{"meta":{"query_hash":"f25370ca5171","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies"},"cohort_total":22,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":22,"exported":22,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/f25370ca5171","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Legislative+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W1967333694","doi":"10.1080/13572330500166642","title":"Forging a new political culture: Plenary behaviour in the scottish parliament","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Politics; Appeal; Political culture; Political science; Public administration; Political system; Devolution (biology); Law; Sociology; Adversarial system; Political economy; Democracy","score_opus":0.06357643539640366,"score_gpt":0.3907655827019897,"score_spread":0.327189147305586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967333694","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97742,0.00025868128,0.00046965302,0.0034639852,0.000070371636,0.00003401545,0.000022476088,0.000038592447,0.018222203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947994,0.00015056328,0.00021104171,0.0008996163,0.00006053733,0.000018605113,0.000027143436,0.000020933217,0.0038122495],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821904,0.0116555905,0.00057575543,0.00071969535,0.002961914,0.0018967551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97261184,0.0129992785,0.0058382284,0.0011334766,0.0027365964,0.0046804654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013128034,0.0003002194,0.00060224964,0.0023123997,0.011692315,0.0071490277,0.0010719963,0.0024308087,0.007108419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047118172,0.0005667115,0.00047642982,0.0013850571,0.005345453,0.0030910126,0.004778575,0.00310078,0.0015067906],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026291344,0.00020163253,0.04945912,0.000119238284,0.000045155273,0.0022540754,0.9008593,0.00007531706,0.0051262733,0.0041123955,0.0061025764,0.031382002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027999376,0.00051109324,0.16042805,0.00020518538,0.000030588206,0.0018474294,0.7399839,0.0006399206,0.0013827531,0.0015101838,0.093277186,0.00015575063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009149927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019817907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013128034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003629378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018615313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0694285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972474204","doi":"10.1080/1357233042000322319","title":"The executive and parliament in canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Legislature; Political science; Cabinet (room); Scrutiny; Public administration; Separation of powers; Law; Legitimacy; Power (physics); Government (linguistics); Democracy; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03526958935511319,"score_gpt":0.3251219842500981,"score_spread":0.2898523948949849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972474204","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14334698,0.023911273,0.0004795303,0.1478153,0.00189997,0.00007387914,0.0011185635,0.000109407796,0.681245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8259633,0.008352204,0.0005267808,0.017007798,0.00031381537,0.000029487524,0.00044671673,0.00006537658,0.14729463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99397767,0.00049156795,0.00011357707,0.00034532798,0.0019399475,0.0031318392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99110293,0.0010320788,0.0005150079,0.00014005783,0.0029320687,0.0042778705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002460556,0.00021440005,0.0004854572,0.0020648658,0.021308925,0.0075627184,0.0012100587,0.0018298207,0.021314003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009644477,0.00031783254,0.0002918755,0.0047730315,0.0057087834,0.0016122935,0.0026754416,0.0037802712,0.001131751],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014092433,0.00010032727,0.040836398,0.00028594566,0.000041973148,0.00077583856,0.023225354,0.00056057377,0.00033966475,0.49934754,0.34025964,0.094085895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029893345,0.000023872792,0.10249954,0.00034327828,0.00002936846,0.00013604572,0.014375364,0.00037539826,0.00018781722,0.0086298585,0.87330145,0.00006826158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99455124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8301996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16980039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2584254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9629139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996965981","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2013.812356","title":"Legislative Dissent without Reprisal? An Alternative View of Speaker Selection","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Legislature; Opposition (politics); Popularity; Political science; Legislative intent; Selection (genetic algorithm); Public relations; Law; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07743213812032024,"score_gpt":0.3914000847078785,"score_spread":0.3139679465875583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996965981","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13588314,0.0015912734,0.08166571,0.04874389,0.0008346236,0.00024239483,0.000115909555,0.00012470529,0.73079836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9597682,0.00034216282,0.0060011907,0.003944071,0.0009094361,0.00017314304,0.000036118523,0.000042922664,0.028782664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98394805,0.007997186,0.00036160205,0.0022959774,0.0037981377,0.0015990032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99133646,0.0048938747,0.0011798597,0.00088850484,0.0011629399,0.0005382513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010194086,0.0005776051,0.0005754777,0.0023326878,0.0039576474,0.0053742705,0.001918631,0.0032938605,0.014311258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016631505,0.00024751094,0.0008711618,0.0013152012,0.016163835,0.00545834,0.0030936836,0.0032136603,0.0015697342],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083000596,0.00006617498,0.003463618,0.00006870512,0.000027820337,0.00022482601,0.012854507,0.0005077295,0.00065325754,0.9620842,0.0019710094,0.017995201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015689679,0.00026149178,0.011844128,0.00018577819,0.00007231269,0.00082125055,0.014647923,0.0058026747,0.0013066356,0.8719233,0.09290277,0.00007480527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034179515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030310682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014311258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029951802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003138353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053912103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028522308","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2012.673063","title":"A Bilingual Legislature? Question Period in Canada's House of Commons","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Commons; Legislature; Period (music); Sample (material); Institution; Norm (philosophy); Neuroscience of multilingualism; House of Representatives; Political science; Danish; Law; Public administration; Sociology; Linguistics; Politics","score_opus":0.045729523644208514,"score_gpt":0.35783926055628273,"score_spread":0.3121097369120742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028522308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98103046,0.00045987178,0.00014326807,0.0023632685,0.000020152396,0.0000410239,0.0002950019,0.0000085557385,0.015638415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99736065,0.00011386477,0.000099948375,0.00029428,0.000007415101,0.000016144239,0.000103643324,0.000005192159,0.0019990257],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939062,0.0021808725,0.00020660249,0.000676647,0.0014198166,0.0016098866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977535,0.008502533,0.0060139545,0.0005163102,0.0048069376,0.002625291],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071342015,0.000098625125,0.0003674473,0.0016108688,0.008771195,0.0048046974,0.000727911,0.00111254,0.0029571154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021185875,0.00025507962,0.00019414483,0.0030306792,0.004516738,0.0015067518,0.0021229065,0.0013647459,0.0002615145],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042807887,0.00017815207,0.50588185,0.0001555053,0.00003046306,0.0005980556,0.4398785,0.00022006483,0.0024517355,0.016325435,0.005616019,0.028236097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018570052,0.00006255898,0.7917374,0.00011900854,0.000014316253,0.00011607203,0.16416125,0.00025580046,0.0008409116,0.0007052916,0.041923072,0.000045768295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9315403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9669037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033096343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030207044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2691155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031419457","doi":"10.1080/1357233042000318891","title":"Still different after all these years? A comparison of female and male Canadian MPs in the twentieth century","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Women's College Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Politics; Convergence (economics); Political science; Period (music); Gender studies; Demographic economics; Sociology; Demography; Law; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.0904739919859172,"score_gpt":0.3911107678644337,"score_spread":0.3006367758785165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031419457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95588297,0.0012002779,0.00006677912,0.0034103468,0.000092750415,0.000016233747,0.00029657382,0.000006503313,0.039027628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856867,0.0009278528,0.000060687245,0.0006079099,0.000024007342,0.0000072130283,0.00012650069,0.000010688455,0.012548467],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972276,0.00016053268,0.000024988265,0.00012909513,0.0007889941,0.001668772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986588,0.00008316871,0.00014931186,0.000024690355,0.0005234503,0.00056054915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011829028,0.00019478786,0.0003603445,0.0021968663,0.011895445,0.0041594286,0.0007777857,0.000719927,0.0057778438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031652267,0.00023588986,0.0002497618,0.0034050534,0.0027780293,0.0009947427,0.0015350569,0.0010562954,0.00054560596],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004458247,0.000081208134,0.28377596,0.00012240365,0.00005497401,0.0008549677,0.56071764,0.00011422492,0.002650105,0.02458595,0.017618868,0.10897796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009138205,0.000053749052,0.55542254,0.000094794974,0.00002504937,0.00019701447,0.3406963,0.00006880275,0.0003053848,0.00029001426,0.10279534,0.000041855175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97457695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9915388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031939175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031939175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035153344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23173606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038486272","doi":"10.1080/1357233042000322346","title":"Japan: the prime minister and the Japanese Diet","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Prime minister; Politics; Political science; Lower house; Public administration; Norm (philosophy); Democracy; Prime (order theory); Political economy; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.07974298120193073,"score_gpt":0.3973245224139821,"score_spread":0.31758154121205134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038486272","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34649372,0.046286047,0.00035610842,0.18807088,0.0022782364,0.000025055224,0.00050608383,0.00003653961,0.41594744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8802994,0.020387726,0.00038423092,0.012184794,0.00073139794,0.000021832011,0.0002053181,0.000023122884,0.085762136],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997249,0.00009141256,0.000009016204,0.00003102643,0.000033541073,0.00011008714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994579,0.000051961226,0.0000734826,0.000011779876,0.00008318336,0.0003217452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080189796,0.00018718977,0.0001985466,0.0005819022,0.003116088,0.0031780256,0.00019815605,0.00088680524,0.012091274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00098016,0.00018303102,0.00007446947,0.0014165404,0.001555684,0.0014154204,0.0016143143,0.00132861,0.0010263108],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060148764,0.0002656492,0.09864503,0.0012552276,0.00009285594,0.0025088075,0.09133309,0.00015058258,0.001917217,0.2754837,0.37727273,0.1504735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035223366,0.000076332115,0.10169246,0.00042641966,0.000037885682,0.00032316908,0.04029795,0.00006490986,0.00012930701,0.00958863,0.84729844,0.00002923062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02896688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09461921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02896688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002755348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026666247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057596564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051958251","doi":"10.1080/13572330903302505","title":"Legislative Strengthening Meets Party Support in International Assistance: A Closer Relationship?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Democratization; Public administration; Civil society; Political science; Work (physics); Politics; Corporate governance; Democracy; Political economy; Public relations; Economics; Law; Management; Engineering","score_opus":0.07404214872354592,"score_gpt":0.40283261015220534,"score_spread":0.3287904614286594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051958251","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0739247,0.019199906,0.005720636,0.41375616,0.0026812565,0.00007611726,0.00019041599,0.00008259379,0.4843683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9592426,0.006371935,0.0014345086,0.01753137,0.0018383499,0.000111599365,0.00009506907,0.0000552192,0.013319421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9688019,0.0221132,0.0009417844,0.00172808,0.0033596102,0.0030553096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95053023,0.02973644,0.0077270838,0.0020375685,0.0060699503,0.0038987715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018754598,0.0003912031,0.0006346279,0.0031737143,0.0037401542,0.017138498,0.0015742374,0.005517549,0.03832278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049352456,0.00040404004,0.00045099156,0.0065740175,0.0087905815,0.017475482,0.010315887,0.009992015,0.0018092667],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012081998,0.0002587238,0.010047901,0.0007160938,0.00006937221,0.00022925898,0.023177402,0.00023719786,0.00027599296,0.869965,0.031610206,0.06329199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009070614,0.0002300195,0.038969997,0.0038086092,0.00015158525,0.00035291445,0.08290069,0.00051944423,0.0011708848,0.12290693,0.74881524,0.00008295334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018288872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002147636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03832278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004656699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005056773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12820244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052744333","doi":"10.1080/13572330801920887","title":"Parliamentary Opposition in Westminster Democracies: Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Veto; Political economy; Political science; Democracy; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.10495716550873443,"score_gpt":0.35295669859678874,"score_spread":0.2479995330880543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052744333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97403526,0.00038071786,0.000054458003,0.00053732906,0.000008519323,0.000021302116,0.00008008527,0.0000057745424,0.024876565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994849,0.0002976887,0.000092042,0.00010801433,0.0000045732236,0.000016919035,0.00007018298,0.000007963227,0.0045535057],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963052,0.0004255012,0.00017509227,0.00021715651,0.001221922,0.0016551464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99449337,0.001111768,0.0018082452,0.0001660182,0.0014545477,0.00096612255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002247104,0.00014520009,0.00062823616,0.0038938608,0.006593085,0.004404533,0.00068867207,0.0005984049,0.004019957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073631834,0.0003198674,0.00028656708,0.0072568045,0.004569487,0.0012069057,0.0026264726,0.0014253652,0.00026229033],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008585884,0.00024036193,0.47148076,0.00046876032,0.00022505014,0.0022206507,0.37400356,0.0008729679,0.0029953618,0.08163593,0.006885854,0.058112163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033349854,0.000044619886,0.9045915,0.00012292061,0.000050839317,0.00019472817,0.0652777,0.00061534386,0.0004477642,0.0010770817,0.027488936,0.00005526081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9028072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9654768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097192824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030908782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0222064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22425991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056802693","doi":"10.1080/714003922","title":"The Canadian Senate: Chamber of Sober Reflection or Loony Cousin Best Not Talked About","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Cousin; Constitution; Cynicism; Political science; Law; Democracy; Population; Impeachment; Quarter (Canadian coin); House of Representatives; Sociology; Parliament; Politics","score_opus":0.12630434096396473,"score_gpt":0.3827845787053584,"score_spread":0.2564802377413937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056802693","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005098518,0.022088323,0.0006946986,0.7488664,0.009108184,0.00004096754,0.0002839505,0.00008231175,0.21373668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28843284,0.018732363,0.0019070943,0.34158984,0.0034321705,0.00006175479,0.00021378626,0.00031739438,0.34531274],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990719,0.0016745236,0.0001779984,0.0012458562,0.0033393262,0.002843258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911624,0.0018160809,0.00021685133,0.0004160374,0.0044944044,0.0018942388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006325546,0.0006249058,0.0006894463,0.0014188146,0.04018223,0.018220123,0.002290612,0.009124189,0.0146864075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019276163,0.00057187816,0.00043031582,0.002529205,0.02363317,0.0047783866,0.0033489398,0.012946861,0.0022093914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002186678,0.000010880294,0.000814781,0.000052448926,0.000010146193,0.00015227239,0.006653567,0.00006948691,0.00023718164,0.20176165,0.7772895,0.012926285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039737615,0.0000030618362,0.0010874524,0.000145452,0.000008708139,0.000029162926,0.0062012007,0.000044586457,0.000111529465,0.0047156163,0.98761415,0.000035048546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97413456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9875616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92345357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07654642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17277274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55538577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071263895","doi":"10.1080/714003894","title":"Do Ideological Preferences Explain Parliamentary Behaviour? Evidence from Great Britain and Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Cohesion (chemistry); Parliament; Loyalty; Dissent; Spurious relationship; Political science; Variety (cybernetics); Positive economics; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Social psychology; Politics; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.17554852723289688,"score_gpt":0.4024137154461031,"score_spread":0.22686518821320623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071263895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9845254,0.0018438796,0.000106149135,0.0017048521,0.000026611893,0.0000308982,0.0014414263,0.0000054812936,0.010315292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949669,0.00082298904,0.00009557904,0.00015955177,0.000008557144,0.000013453114,0.0009847804,0.000009771224,0.0029383309],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99647164,0.00078162894,0.00015988637,0.00038514516,0.0010090607,0.0011925764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98031116,0.0068418724,0.0029803454,0.0009439934,0.0064397384,0.002482977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004286093,0.00040238854,0.0012647224,0.0023513485,0.005171262,0.002620931,0.0018187308,0.0008146829,0.010342507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018153302,0.0004944345,0.0005519389,0.009646886,0.002771109,0.000839892,0.001816235,0.0013511473,0.00077202305],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009531537,0.00020671656,0.8679972,0.0004620974,0.0005503969,0.00093506085,0.06440581,0.00066887954,0.0005144437,0.0083361585,0.015377306,0.039592717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006707999,0.000030602667,0.9710811,0.00017292908,0.00011954732,0.00006460458,0.019136779,0.0003847896,0.00010628532,0.00040746896,0.0083938,0.00003504951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99478084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025860699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025860699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02813105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1876334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092100935","doi":"10.1080/13572330500158599","title":"Imposing a neo-liberal theory of representation on the Westminster model: A Canadian case","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Legitimacy; Representation (politics); Public administration; Obligation; Parliament; Democracy; Proportional representation; Ideology; Restructuring; Government (linguistics); Political science; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.09152225834305129,"score_gpt":0.34945503388477217,"score_spread":0.2579327755417209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092100935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34150782,0.0017086096,0.00424516,0.038855042,0.00014362937,0.00018096417,0.00023184507,0.000032941534,0.61309403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96116656,0.00093627267,0.001406913,0.002074345,0.000024220832,0.000052003164,0.000038876206,0.000014142662,0.034286685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993704,0.0012700723,0.000077452336,0.00034573156,0.0015957637,0.0030069007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788576,0.0005801667,0.00017104835,0.0001514682,0.0007391308,0.00047249813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004216551,0.00034604094,0.00049669005,0.0016986836,0.032418787,0.0067198407,0.0020389461,0.0033541978,0.0037536283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063099144,0.0003515946,0.00047096398,0.004069755,0.012876354,0.002536128,0.0027808088,0.0034648671,0.0002819327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002412958,0.000018535124,0.0022087556,0.000016114716,0.0000040633868,0.0005465998,0.018087622,0.0005402214,0.00009126457,0.9670769,0.00605598,0.0053297863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018656767,0.00008844752,0.02498285,0.0004137393,0.0001273325,0.0011096298,0.114040285,0.012107723,0.00092227745,0.21251579,0.63327485,0.00023048154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9921894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15115649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15115649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11064016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98453814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328330448","doi":"10.1080/1357233042000306308","title":"Part 2: Discipline","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Warrant; Sketch; Dissent; Cohesion (chemistry); Transaction cost; Action (physics); Database transaction; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Economics; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.09451341602553234,"score_gpt":0.4079058538602078,"score_spread":0.3133924378346754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328330448","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011400023,0.007960913,0.0052546686,0.022864785,0.0027658828,0.00017653273,0.00042556156,0.00009363974,0.949058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49999577,0.013476094,0.0040607015,0.018363599,0.00667948,0.00075071986,0.0009642104,0.00032115087,0.4553883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98932916,0.0033700967,0.00047495693,0.00159555,0.0031782542,0.002051982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98090464,0.0068133315,0.0025267717,0.0024409427,0.0039847386,0.0033296153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068474966,0.0006824053,0.0008399212,0.0038289754,0.0052400073,0.011003448,0.0016548092,0.0036321157,0.10759817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024961576,0.00042339796,0.0012436848,0.0072281663,0.008702466,0.0073125223,0.008025918,0.004908635,0.01895613],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008901742,0.00011535827,0.0060241856,0.00040859348,0.000018068748,0.00020693893,0.006043102,0.00027063617,0.0002681966,0.7622406,0.10844007,0.115875214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041165767,0.000115583905,0.011407336,0.00091477734,0.000020828042,0.0007026431,0.004045567,0.00028685396,0.000249028,0.21298873,0.76919824,0.000029201148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040184343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003059515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10759817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008898279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008137084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35995173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236327344","doi":"10.1080/13572330008420634","title":"Book reviews","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Democracy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.145154533585428,"score_gpt":0.45532544251051577,"score_spread":0.31017090892508775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236327344","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046289485,0.110330656,0.0019832547,0.015532,0.0290952,0.00024523417,0.004954379,0.0012454565,0.83615094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018737412,0.053360526,0.001552729,0.007075142,0.007479877,0.00012908818,0.004408351,0.00066739134,0.92345315],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851614,0.00015894942,0.0000958503,0.000272109,0.00083641877,0.0001205195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99768496,0.0004690675,0.00012804822,0.00021634313,0.0011429543,0.00035857697],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074827863,0.0011309216,0.0013707549,0.0038629894,0.001524962,0.007971205,0.00269996,0.0025065767,0.5696975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048589483,0.0005077295,0.0009164625,0.0051867915,0.0007758666,0.004592458,0.0024790107,0.0027014448,0.52098715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012125944,0.000021156735,0.00003829806,0.00045073504,0.0000039002934,0.000050178165,0.00005584917,0.00004174995,0.00012197231,0.003335134,0.907205,0.08866392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019333158,0.0000036816311,0.000048457,0.00018765003,0.0000016779439,0.00006427719,0.000028023615,0.000007399335,0.00001879666,0.00055563246,0.99908006,0.000002471975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003380964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057013296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5696975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022361618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039531197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6137743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251278139","doi":"10.1080/1357233042000322283","title":"The parliamentary activity of the head of government in ireland (1923–2000) in comparative perspective","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Irish; Government (linguistics); Perspective (graphical); Northern ireland; Accountability; Political science; Head (geology); Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Ethnology","score_opus":0.07149466536706303,"score_gpt":0.38951512279980033,"score_spread":0.3180204574327373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251278139","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90444756,0.0044677723,0.0001292471,0.001696998,0.000106533975,0.000021825344,0.0011701004,0.000015250299,0.087944806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98932195,0.0015172261,0.00009895256,0.00024270339,0.000074873526,0.00001602238,0.0007430344,0.000015401843,0.007969889],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972025,0.00044093898,0.00014125362,0.00021913221,0.00048844377,0.0015077761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946238,0.0009549001,0.0018577337,0.00020728786,0.0015157589,0.0008405233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030834533,0.00013018839,0.00039157787,0.007041039,0.0020768119,0.0036330684,0.00067478156,0.00078267057,0.003957066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007641964,0.00022275826,0.00029421118,0.010299921,0.002441486,0.002063589,0.001970047,0.0014753866,0.00069679157],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012536588,0.00019599695,0.54653597,0.00096036145,0.00022420901,0.0020842103,0.21254215,0.0011458133,0.0016546735,0.035943665,0.032403994,0.16505533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054699844,0.000061123406,0.9081187,0.00012868633,0.00001895296,0.00022269614,0.020891912,0.00003987436,0.00023414532,0.00018037597,0.07006337,0.000034589735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28277212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57628304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28277212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017936468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055505065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5622524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318541381","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2023.2171542","title":"Opposition parties in times of pandemics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Parliament; Legislature; Solidarity; Politics; Psychological intervention; Political science; Pandemic; Political economy; Sociology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.16710286296449992,"score_gpt":0.44613955726674254,"score_spread":0.27903669430224265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318541381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9091248,0.0003733804,0.00055080676,0.0046137227,0.00007947589,0.00005058892,0.000106903884,0.000014019153,0.085086286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99709773,0.00008225078,0.0000712826,0.00027838512,0.000025017342,0.000018863093,0.000027945402,0.0000060552184,0.00239249],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943479,0.00293435,0.00007705466,0.00024730145,0.00056428753,0.001829153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988846,0.0052276254,0.00271258,0.0004450984,0.0011459282,0.0016229029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005427077,0.00016348965,0.0002843292,0.0021211647,0.007398194,0.0048504635,0.00064945646,0.0016077437,0.0082307635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015530745,0.0002319291,0.0001622697,0.0020978246,0.0063896677,0.00173545,0.0031994982,0.0019720362,0.00039744002],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006091115,0.00023009494,0.24731736,0.0002829058,0.00006260307,0.0025613012,0.5778729,0.0006265106,0.0021661646,0.10033263,0.01442493,0.053513516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004263069,0.00008562239,0.37529933,0.0002656345,0.000026522,0.0003123153,0.4927462,0.0007911444,0.00064091804,0.0061059245,0.12362703,0.000056786277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11632181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24366745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11632181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007997137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004962125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23128945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327844812","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2023.2190695","title":"Institutional change and partisanship in the Canadian Senate","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Political science; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Liberal Party; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Politics; Parliament","score_opus":0.39419581853591046,"score_gpt":0.4417479409554658,"score_spread":0.047552122419555365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4327844812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9235157,0.0011895522,0.00029433912,0.00454135,0.000093685005,0.00014344901,0.00066070235,0.00002649451,0.06953481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951166,0.00025887307,0.00008343341,0.00036816238,0.000012768868,0.000026948066,0.00013916694,0.000008838462,0.0039853277],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909657,0.0017828051,0.00015147861,0.0006015858,0.0019490635,0.004549332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892489,0.0013079089,0.0014140769,0.0006870854,0.004042394,0.0032995578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005237674,0.00022528721,0.00047633672,0.0022146704,0.01593822,0.0039121895,0.0016107007,0.00085855776,0.0074228616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014847228,0.00023808204,0.00052407285,0.003776346,0.0071982336,0.001040268,0.0038533462,0.0016761252,0.00042577457],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085576554,0.00060130435,0.6853105,0.00028104568,0.00027873082,0.00070526596,0.13597712,0.0017661927,0.0020640604,0.04237387,0.031818524,0.09796765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002472545,0.000079944235,0.8859256,0.00014157209,0.000049979655,0.00003379523,0.06365194,0.00033136026,0.00034093586,0.0008649888,0.048490334,0.00006477552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9837219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99318767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9134243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08657568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08625417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62815344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366140343","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2023.2202089","title":"Why would a majority agree to adopting supermajority rules when they empower a minority? The institutional choice of the National Assembly of Korea","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Academy of Korean Studies","keywords":"Legislature; Lawmaking; Legislation; Newspaper; Sociology; Law; Economics; Law and economics; Political science","score_opus":0.16975394024585733,"score_gpt":0.4220214127768845,"score_spread":0.25226747253102716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366140343","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92156136,0.00020857874,0.001615512,0.019357853,0.00014240624,0.000060308827,0.000054941676,0.000013776821,0.056985322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968334,0.00004743651,0.00017116887,0.0011417223,0.00002208575,0.000014791923,0.000010406207,0.000006097422,0.0017529313],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98917294,0.0061612055,0.0004238983,0.0011414201,0.0010206128,0.00207998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858233,0.0065540313,0.002659364,0.0010703355,0.0023557604,0.0015372355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014743962,0.00012210122,0.000221963,0.0006911436,0.0063698175,0.004888759,0.00073331984,0.0014292138,0.0039067953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029408073,0.0002460925,0.00021893672,0.0007358855,0.004975374,0.003267398,0.0019091626,0.0023575008,0.0006965014],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061030785,0.00035399303,0.22546257,0.0003072475,0.00014029478,0.0031914746,0.37934783,0.0005165886,0.0084083555,0.24467313,0.02073901,0.116249144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074066855,0.00021120641,0.14048228,0.00032235336,0.000071024144,0.00052859494,0.6774768,0.0016094691,0.002953055,0.029545385,0.14656314,0.00016262673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009196414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013978735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014743962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028488284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002556063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0779745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384133609","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2023.2233207","title":"Conscientiousness of representatives and agreement with their party positions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Conscientiousness; Loyalty; Dissent; Political science; House of Representatives; Ideology; Unison; Social psychology; Personality; Big Five personality traits; Public relations; Law; Psychology; Extraversion and introversion; Politics","score_opus":0.12343329856319771,"score_gpt":0.4344024705019436,"score_spread":0.31096917193874585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384133609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99822503,0.00001508194,0.000074038006,0.000033365435,0.000002553068,0.000004857905,0.000013685367,0.0000019534639,0.0016295224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996086,0.000009668354,0.000047810026,0.000008108577,0.000004728681,0.000003846954,0.000033656266,6.836958e-7,0.00028294875],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850094,0.00050540717,0.00011919154,0.00013691925,0.00046046995,0.00027710566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825885,0.0045456896,0.00873102,0.0011010205,0.0010319827,0.0020017263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019077727,0.00014227834,0.00019671743,0.0013567635,0.0008933022,0.00095882517,0.00021669193,0.00032405904,0.0038031065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012762083,0.000118727956,0.00021950735,0.0007033964,0.0009170906,0.00045931444,0.00092719943,0.00062828505,0.00039684522],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010907524,0.00018112575,0.9827711,0.000019440102,0.000043565717,0.00014994845,0.004391675,0.00016716188,0.0010905637,0.0005126082,0.00020454946,0.0103590945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003562709,0.000046097604,0.99737835,0.000006523407,0.0000028481866,0.0000744504,0.0018134839,0.00011978403,0.000085936415,0.00016765787,0.00029607728,0.000005142351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021249268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003889731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038031065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032427566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030447278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012722671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391772215","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2024.2313310","title":"Governments and parliaments in a state of emergency: what can we learn from the COVID-19 pandemic?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Socio-political and Technological Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); State of emergency; Political science; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; State (computer science); Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Public administration; Virology; Medicine; Law; Computer science; Politics; Outbreak","score_opus":0.16306645707218942,"score_gpt":0.4247199404289856,"score_spread":0.26165348335679617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391772215","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9624208,0.0012467073,0.00043898306,0.01653965,0.000078694444,0.000008271512,0.00009462066,0.000005420055,0.019166853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99818414,0.0004991424,0.00008054852,0.00055006956,0.00003716884,0.0000036094998,0.000054098193,0.0000046397,0.0005864695],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963952,0.0018794372,0.00012537286,0.00033631249,0.00033797542,0.0009257202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850464,0.0069710617,0.0046362635,0.0008365845,0.00097501965,0.0015346733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040979204,0.000102851525,0.00037904838,0.0011081547,0.002534916,0.0051073073,0.0005040281,0.0013456893,0.0040015266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017057497,0.00022035494,0.00024107666,0.0018011685,0.0064249244,0.007447551,0.0026950713,0.0027648348,0.0003678667],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026887804,0.00020700111,0.52591914,0.00024131649,0.00008893927,0.0010959574,0.3494255,0.00076854153,0.0006234764,0.06254927,0.005226665,0.053585313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008530916,0.00008649666,0.6172302,0.00026726266,0.000021234815,0.00030559793,0.33915314,0.0003634592,0.0002853866,0.010974778,0.031260554,0.000043413933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013172582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028672615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013172582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024008444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019681212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026191771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400873207","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2024.2381155","title":"Gender and legislative committees in Africa: a study of Rwanda and South Africa","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Gender studies; Economic growth; Geography; Public administration; Development economics; Socioeconomics; Sociology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.15478117206927114,"score_gpt":0.389906272070032,"score_spread":0.23512510000076084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400873207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986149,0.00023792525,0.000039172268,0.00015420216,0.0000044211292,0.0000111482,0.000024225386,5.7681893e-7,0.0009134735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998771,0.0003379009,0.000071710805,0.00006992188,0.0000070945775,0.000026396181,0.00002595267,0.0000026206965,0.0006873918],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785584,0.0011765808,0.00008723129,0.00014481653,0.00017131404,0.00056423864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99537706,0.0018539521,0.0017691175,0.00010232312,0.000292959,0.0006045981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032658423,0.00021501421,0.00039320375,0.00187019,0.0035914348,0.0016406704,0.00038109403,0.000477011,0.0023659372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007359573,0.0004526497,0.00016631799,0.0026123393,0.0018251436,0.0015394452,0.001574415,0.0008017863,0.00026051185],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000119001445,0.00013614961,0.300774,0.00016779207,0.000022479999,0.0006338043,0.6756706,0.000032479988,0.002120883,0.0016111932,0.0009514135,0.017760227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006420912,0.00010710169,0.58158153,0.00016565311,0.000014066529,0.0002522324,0.40721625,0.000054903252,0.00023522128,0.00010159699,0.010250951,0.000014119616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033722807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.093267664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033722807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017393088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020498978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06705308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403129625","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2024.2411479","title":"Let's talk about something else: how cabinet members divert issue attention in answers to parliamentary questions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06753322322091648,"score_gpt":0.4168802095524323,"score_spread":0.34934698633151584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403129625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9804357,0.0004619582,0.0013248458,0.0020783057,0.00003109594,0.000036498517,0.000022358041,0.000016475555,0.015592643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968353,0.00018250362,0.0006482025,0.00033404172,0.000018161752,0.00004421358,0.0000364868,0.000017774872,0.0018832393],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97015643,0.02455104,0.0005933232,0.0012690002,0.0017862906,0.001643968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9460648,0.0416821,0.0053681233,0.00170589,0.0029054885,0.0022735929],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019149115,0.00021885303,0.0005691729,0.0020057515,0.005694942,0.0056535816,0.00091605657,0.00153798,0.0046689035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08464367,0.00047610744,0.00023671897,0.0016157627,0.004509337,0.0045282748,0.004547227,0.0018631552,0.0008986806],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028978044,0.0001509759,0.084313914,0.0001805343,0.000036046687,0.00031531643,0.8526115,0.000097003125,0.0032244597,0.0068128295,0.0016579712,0.050309688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039962877,0.000259403,0.15640846,0.00025240096,0.00003852307,0.00038776666,0.7976765,0.00078589807,0.0010222397,0.0051924684,0.03787811,0.000058221714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072352495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010962266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019149115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021657918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020410712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10127139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409493846","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2025.2488540","title":"Legislative influence in House of Commons committees in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Columbia College","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Legislature; House of Representatives; Political science; Commons; Public administration; Law; Politics; Parliament","score_opus":0.03078921293381114,"score_gpt":0.3508149797923369,"score_spread":0.32002576685852574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409493846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65815055,0.006433061,0.0013450253,0.030826842,0.00043138568,0.0001957953,0.0015509215,0.00010697016,0.30095944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98092777,0.00088440726,0.00024217463,0.0013163161,0.0000415522,0.000018674558,0.00018742455,0.000027557362,0.016354103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878754,0.0018118613,0.00024711946,0.0010387229,0.0044902326,0.0045367065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97774553,0.0054529887,0.0029737619,0.00063870964,0.0072364793,0.005952474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057568583,0.00018217631,0.0005283147,0.0034210843,0.017412681,0.007002767,0.0017366144,0.0012704809,0.0076697054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02265082,0.0004441915,0.00034542655,0.006485445,0.007236774,0.0017460762,0.004471202,0.002245175,0.0004613738],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033104984,0.000178928,0.21384759,0.00055390765,0.00014165606,0.0012421013,0.24404433,0.0019249934,0.0021117867,0.2660128,0.114442505,0.15516852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003171605,0.000056473906,0.49245307,0.00052896724,0.00007870675,0.00011229463,0.071017995,0.00078934175,0.0008096151,0.005072084,0.42891845,0.0001312941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9839707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99461824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8635702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13642982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19299686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9898722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}