{"meta":{"query_hash":"f25370ca5171","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies"},"cohort_total":22,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":22,"exported":22,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/f25370ca5171","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Legislative+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W1967333694","doi":"10.1080/13572330500166642","title":"Forging a new political culture: Plenary behaviour in the scottish parliament","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Politics; Appeal; Political culture; Political science; Public administration; Political system; Devolution (biology); Law; Sociology; Adversarial system; Political economy; Democracy","score_opus":0.06357643539640366,"score_gpt":0.3907655827019897,"score_spread":0.327189147305586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967333694","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37498924,0.048315205,0.0005521038,0.256919,0.0015640343,0.0008345204,0.000026085438,0.00003070941,0.3167691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937739,0.00042350125,0.00038627788,0.0009805032,0.0021163924,0.000003261213,6.374186e-8,0.000003984447,0.0023121152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820375,0.00026527687,0.00040173964,0.00008781691,0.00060853775,0.00043284483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990988,0.00031743932,0.00023544418,0.00006449991,0.00015354512,0.00013027669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010751665,0.000095435855,0.0002718768,0.00003747519,0.0002409252,0.000052518855,0.00023800597,0.000041544026,0.0000139798385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000699373,0.000055517292,0.0001171149,0.00016167147,0.00027233726,0.0003712229,0.000035653615,0.00027317833,0.000006026656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021046637,0.00014003828,0.047845714,0.000010579983,0.00011156276,0.0000776931,0.20009923,0.0000074321374,0.000009983823,0.6853478,0.063495696,0.0028332116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008118363,0.00023103533,0.08199687,0.0004311067,0.000048131496,0.00003529412,0.099741675,0.000003572238,0.000025024212,0.01733211,0.79916596,0.0001773566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003872132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068717776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73567027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003503408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020112346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5853531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972474204","doi":"10.1080/1357233042000322319","title":"The executive and parliament in canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Legislature; Political science; Cabinet (room); Scrutiny; Public administration; Separation of powers; Law; Legitimacy; Power (physics); Government (linguistics); Democracy; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03526958935511319,"score_gpt":0.3251219842500981,"score_spread":0.2898523948949849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972474204","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8297189,0.04137268,0.000046390418,0.05806191,0.0011739178,0.00022063585,0.0000074236077,0.0000025405432,0.069395624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99635816,0.0029552851,0.000026052641,0.000114702416,0.00013692513,0.0000014503707,3.8684864e-9,0.0000012368041,0.00040619718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992365,0.00008238871,0.0001953362,0.000039871167,0.00028021046,0.00016569167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992502,0.00037622306,0.00017280663,0.000024239958,0.00012786462,0.000048668146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049255596,0.000042194424,0.00014201386,0.000009671784,0.00024716553,0.000015639007,0.0000682226,0.000009037479,6.2123803e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006234199,0.000023428152,0.00001880655,0.00006866366,0.00025189063,0.00009599167,0.000019913909,0.000093117655,2.1879211e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043776905,0.000030087747,0.08035254,0.000013359706,0.00028254473,0.0001462596,0.15182494,0.00007463727,0.0000112896905,0.7562327,0.0066877673,0.0043001054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000818042,0.00011037807,0.22514275,0.0003416076,0.0000117205855,0.0000065089507,0.17348617,8.552119e-7,0.0000398122,0.052805595,0.54711777,0.00011879369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9299742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99311167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7034271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009252863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008807326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24195915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996965981","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2013.812356","title":"Legislative Dissent without Reprisal? An Alternative View of Speaker Selection","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Legislature; Opposition (politics); Popularity; Political science; Legislative intent; Selection (genetic algorithm); Public relations; Law; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07743213812032024,"score_gpt":0.3914000847078785,"score_spread":0.3139679465875583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996965981","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6812211,0.01433442,0.002514796,0.010896406,0.0020309763,0.0010376198,0.000014447933,0.000048587757,0.2879016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99402136,0.0032250418,0.0009588257,0.00008039556,0.000969448,0.000012745396,3.5304146e-7,0.0000075679245,0.00072426675],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977582,0.0004347237,0.0006379849,0.00018476267,0.0007263912,0.00025793514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957764,0.0003527231,0.00095617224,0.0000767869,0.0027354325,0.00010247747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008956307,0.00017890922,0.0006123409,0.00013401418,0.0006050656,0.00003532077,0.00019991655,0.000047108264,0.00010470558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009838403,0.00012753285,0.000174111,0.0003823819,0.0016457702,0.0011408341,0.00007168413,0.00023563117,0.000016651824],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023724965,0.0006242692,0.18756835,0.000044034805,0.0042386996,0.000023101962,0.5556937,0.00022284438,0.0013483464,0.22398658,0.005490328,0.020522507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020160722,0.0023491767,0.2580187,0.0012938363,0.00049067166,0.000035152138,0.38012683,0.00007711523,0.0018879197,0.25551823,0.097249635,0.00093667704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045770686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034082874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31280023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020088768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022357526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6919189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028522308","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2012.673063","title":"A Bilingual Legislature? Question Period in Canada's House of Commons","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Commons; Legislature; Period (music); Sample (material); Institution; Norm (philosophy); Neuroscience of multilingualism; House of Representatives; Political science; Danish; Law; Public administration; Sociology; Linguistics; Politics","score_opus":0.045729523644208514,"score_gpt":0.35783926055628273,"score_spread":0.3121097369120742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028522308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9578839,0.01683056,0.000029490062,0.004465587,0.0014877609,0.00012736533,0.00001411485,0.000005961988,0.019155271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986197,0.00029667508,0.00012644789,0.000043001764,0.0005631498,0.0000011055753,4.279636e-8,0.000005643105,0.0003442602],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838775,0.0003133284,0.00044514585,0.000053542437,0.00048772956,0.00031248818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986341,0.0003781376,0.00049848657,0.0000589654,0.0003223667,0.00010794284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011809495,0.00008325502,0.00038276694,0.000054777465,0.00011359987,0.000007965762,0.00012157279,0.000037299593,0.0000057949296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018358872,0.00006209747,0.000067352645,0.00019182086,0.00025987826,0.0003076959,0.000028409624,0.00021385732,6.6771986e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041384676,0.00010668324,0.70006317,0.00003831041,0.00016673178,0.000029583058,0.1296835,0.000021538886,0.00006298006,0.1652586,0.0035653252,0.0009621889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074865954,0.00016192954,0.68887484,0.0007254966,0.0000450823,0.00001833557,0.06351458,0.0000040095497,0.00015237097,0.002335172,0.24317656,0.00024295105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86031586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98350614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23961124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072381005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014808141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26269007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031419457","doi":"10.1080/1357233042000318891","title":"Still different after all these years? A comparison of female and male Canadian MPs in the twentieth century","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Women's College Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Politics; Convergence (economics); Political science; Period (music); Gender studies; Demographic economics; Sociology; Demography; Law; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.0904739919859172,"score_gpt":0.3911107678644337,"score_spread":0.3006367758785165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031419457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9895351,0.004882305,0.00000673842,0.0026131242,0.0001958839,0.00010650432,0.0000049893088,7.006382e-7,0.0026546563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984647,0.001203675,0.00005719306,0.00007659037,0.00009345817,0.0000021427368,1.8449725e-7,0.0000024067683,0.000099672834],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991455,0.00015771016,0.00021844065,0.000056235036,0.000261786,0.00016034201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994948,0.00011238851,0.00016762264,0.000045178527,0.00012176282,0.000058284164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037449563,0.000055352983,0.00018399347,0.00009673062,0.000034517663,0.000022677435,0.000088705376,0.00002500199,0.000009874201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010342473,0.00003400456,0.000047896472,0.00008099338,0.00024897943,0.00008880324,0.000019887702,0.00012525122,4.965109e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010979834,0.000051881416,0.19721214,0.000008963679,0.000080743725,0.000019585177,0.80024195,0.000030731062,0.000010143984,0.0020027752,0.00007852331,0.00025158256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003684391,0.00009400315,0.68068075,0.00006687095,0.000030067225,0.0000031470327,0.30356532,0.0000017513498,0.00002254189,0.0038015803,0.011313361,0.000052143096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024166876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20609805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49667662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010091192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010136837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9823313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038486272","doi":"10.1080/1357233042000322346","title":"Japan: the prime minister and the Japanese Diet","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Prime minister; Politics; Political science; Lower house; Public administration; Norm (philosophy); Democracy; Prime (order theory); Political economy; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.07974298120193073,"score_gpt":0.3973245224139821,"score_spread":0.31758154121205134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038486272","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7999101,0.008342652,0.000025653333,0.16492285,0.0006177742,0.00031105374,0.0000015400884,0.000007181454,0.025861137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997708,0.00015720984,0.000016926162,0.00039363897,0.0006737155,0.0000048596257,2.9028545e-8,0.0000027422093,0.0010428785],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988752,0.00036827326,0.00025385033,0.000049942373,0.00029060084,0.00016210553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986168,0.0007799259,0.000225617,0.000056371864,0.0002764017,0.000044847264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014527325,0.00006327536,0.00020016248,0.000017164211,0.0005763879,0.000051038933,0.00010391005,0.000024157003,0.0000055620612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009457368,0.000025725396,0.00007145331,0.000103849154,0.0013107451,0.00015957179,0.000027481126,0.00013755987,0.0000036219876],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003119738,0.000046174628,0.009310502,0.000016571554,0.00050333305,0.000005834705,0.71825117,0.000015687488,0.000042505726,0.2687682,0.002133825,0.00059423683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008037148,0.0022743212,0.136286,0.0006199571,0.000579496,0.000047039306,0.31672898,0.000009761986,0.00022374532,0.25093052,0.28373364,0.0005293988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012088985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002052714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4015222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006047905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000061073704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48294953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051958251","doi":"10.1080/13572330903302505","title":"Legislative Strengthening Meets Party Support in International Assistance: A Closer Relationship?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"International Development and Aid","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Democratization; Public administration; Civil society; Political science; Work (physics); Politics; Corporate governance; Democracy; Political economy; Public relations; Economics; Law; Management; Engineering","score_opus":0.07404214872354592,"score_gpt":0.40283261015220534,"score_spread":0.3287904614286594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051958251","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13587141,0.0012311577,0.000268383,0.055326793,0.0024149714,0.00023197544,0.000011337027,0.000027918677,0.80461603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896389,0.00054436066,0.0021998002,0.00021414741,0.0005972981,0.0000032085104,0.0000024622693,0.0000054876796,0.006794285],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787027,0.00022187851,0.0006739878,0.00014726394,0.0008431923,0.00024338253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977244,0.00059239194,0.0006349917,0.000053534175,0.0009346441,0.000060032737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015820453,0.00013996243,0.00030495107,0.00034071432,0.00029193267,0.00006297524,0.0002791105,0.00006205398,0.00013143619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020353103,0.000117114214,0.00012346446,0.00033141588,0.00021397184,0.0011029724,0.000033088825,0.00035171755,0.000011494163],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026008693,0.0002293778,0.21473698,0.0000060097473,0.0005454863,0.0001816327,0.4039358,0.00015286692,0.00007534305,0.35839328,0.015887896,0.0055952426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018032246,0.00030655804,0.5393742,0.00047446648,0.000038757065,0.000011357154,0.044165976,0.000029816909,0.000096937845,0.091452844,0.3218447,0.00040117223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022642993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00058653654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8537675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043379425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028563658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47757792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052744333","doi":"10.1080/13572330801920887","title":"Parliamentary Opposition in Westminster Democracies: Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Veto; Political economy; Political science; Democracy; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.10495716550873443,"score_gpt":0.35295669859678874,"score_spread":0.2479995330880543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052744333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819725,0.002307817,0.00000987452,0.012363162,0.0003042008,0.00008032894,0.000008618458,0.0000018044925,0.0029516744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886386,0.0010152829,0.000103169026,0.00028932642,0.00041539303,8.1551747e-7,1.1875415e-7,0.0000024457368,0.009534873],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989711,0.00010996349,0.00029231948,0.00007416642,0.0003369695,0.00021550103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993364,0.0001800617,0.0002010891,0.000030418041,0.0001193895,0.00013264554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027317082,0.000074352676,0.00024724548,0.000032531556,0.00019243061,0.000013876013,0.000064684355,0.000027426877,0.000013987978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022505099,0.000058668862,0.000030360936,0.000088949535,0.00025028316,0.00031204787,0.000019125775,0.00012257115,9.656845e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004710879,0.000036701735,0.62935656,0.000019385565,0.00017706346,0.00044053822,0.06169516,0.00000792172,0.000038105045,0.0040942687,0.30325553,0.00083163014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006790323,0.00014192445,0.72156256,0.00028886998,0.000016162227,0.000059354217,0.009848925,8.533101e-7,0.00002170973,0.0024007908,0.26484898,0.00013084307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.910408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09220597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033590107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035001084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23924467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056802693","doi":"10.1080/714003922","title":"The Canadian Senate: Chamber of Sober Reflection or Loony Cousin Best Not Talked About","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Cousin; Constitution; Cynicism; Political science; Law; Democracy; Population; Impeachment; Quarter (Canadian coin); House of Representatives; Sociology; Parliament; Politics","score_opus":0.12630434096396473,"score_gpt":0.3827845787053584,"score_spread":0.2564802377413937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056802693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26728487,0.024336975,0.00003081524,0.0558258,0.0038477923,0.0005170831,0.00005716312,0.000016165868,0.6480833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96502227,0.0028298371,0.000028184166,0.0001819978,0.0006762868,0.0000022302343,2.7819349e-8,0.000005621703,0.031253524],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846685,0.00019674322,0.00040238156,0.00007742472,0.0005261566,0.0003304688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815243,0.00035885602,0.0005074497,0.00007209239,0.00077126856,0.00013792286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089460355,0.000091274844,0.00028000693,0.000048410337,0.0009940504,0.00004671956,0.0001139727,0.00005851782,0.000054425986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014118976,0.000050439085,0.0000935633,0.00023477689,0.00070092623,0.0002175837,0.000017891456,0.00019268102,0.000014425954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041103314,0.00039320096,0.014451145,0.00015885296,0.002899008,0.00044635584,0.427215,0.000064071406,0.001114256,0.28963763,0.23885627,0.024353156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037434668,0.00019173737,0.007528189,0.0002661677,0.000039595427,0.00002054307,0.008004915,0.000015940499,0.0001973181,0.0008646091,0.98237145,0.00012518905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23240851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86518615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7435152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044639688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002607015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77270293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071263895","doi":"10.1080/714003894","title":"Do Ideological Preferences Explain Parliamentary Behaviour? Evidence from Great Britain and Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Cohesion (chemistry); Parliament; Loyalty; Dissent; Spurious relationship; Political science; Variety (cybernetics); Positive economics; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Social psychology; Politics; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.17554852723289688,"score_gpt":0.4024137154461031,"score_spread":0.22686518821320623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071263895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9844044,0.0084758485,0.00003156061,0.005946336,0.00028382853,0.00009702114,0.0000072028456,0.000004886427,0.0007489122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99805576,0.001020293,0.00011419496,0.00011666919,0.00047959448,0.0000049152213,3.2019986e-7,0.0000026463974,0.00020561952],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833524,0.0004971798,0.00035642972,0.000118300486,0.00045378914,0.00023908018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802965,0.0012485635,0.00024144532,0.000047281977,0.00029194218,0.0001411161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068373355,0.00009609193,0.0002982225,0.00002890967,0.00027770584,0.00004733596,0.000107620705,0.000040568993,0.00007995582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010471924,0.0000666941,0.000039366343,0.00008979263,0.00032510402,0.00038937808,0.000034369692,0.0001475751,9.632249e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032687374,0.000013136502,0.984961,0.000003934589,0.00008402335,0.000058713606,0.009800062,0.0000025611575,0.000026341944,0.00047885682,0.0031304187,0.0014082964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029158784,0.0004225461,0.95122784,0.00054095796,0.00009530761,0.000009280731,0.029737115,0.0000035095811,0.000058242647,0.012129017,0.005294658,0.0001899596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8932001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9648354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071635254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002391069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022738992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27197066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092100935","doi":"10.1080/13572330500158599","title":"Imposing a neo-liberal theory of representation on the Westminster model: A Canadian case","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Legitimacy; Representation (politics); Public administration; Obligation; Parliament; Democracy; Proportional representation; Ideology; Restructuring; Government (linguistics); Political science; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.09152225834305129,"score_gpt":0.34945503388477217,"score_spread":0.2579327755417209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092100935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66642565,0.0070182313,0.00016152527,0.044313252,0.0007509891,0.00034895065,0.000037131085,0.000009773379,0.28093448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939313,0.00039968244,0.00016843792,0.0005603054,0.0003721533,0.0000016727489,9.1722164e-8,0.0000051373013,0.004561219],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989982,0.00026916532,0.0002629883,0.00006468168,0.00024877276,0.00015615099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988626,0.0003519795,0.00029216046,0.000075863696,0.00031671644,0.000100635436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009872463,0.000058160513,0.00016559473,0.0003442977,0.0008392099,0.000058472622,0.00010734269,0.00002989526,0.000055857363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050930004,0.000046248726,0.00010678368,0.00017253857,0.00066070806,0.0003391741,0.000011835131,0.00016545263,0.0000036150573],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009138495,0.000042192056,0.0004025805,0.000010250746,0.00041187851,0.00044483616,0.8140977,0.0021613287,0.000058100926,0.106068,0.048878606,0.027333165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014673696,0.0005991945,0.0028181912,0.0006068166,0.00039685387,0.0005104223,0.41888487,0.0007723235,0.00013043899,0.05005887,0.5231789,0.0005757596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2901686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.979523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6893544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083131355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009143942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71455824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328330448","doi":"10.1080/1357233042000306308","title":"Part 2: Discipline","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Warrant; Sketch; Dissent; Cohesion (chemistry); Transaction cost; Action (physics); Database transaction; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Economics; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.09451341602553234,"score_gpt":0.4079058538602078,"score_spread":0.3133924378346754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328330448","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06741277,0.017830161,0.0005163791,0.011429997,0.0030790481,0.00014595794,0.000009510278,0.0000137641155,0.8995624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98408914,0.0010558012,0.000250248,0.00010758242,0.0009094193,0.0000013530899,2.1108011e-8,0.0000036322483,0.013582798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886894,0.00022101638,0.0002860313,0.000057355057,0.0003593698,0.00020729339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989024,0.00032103923,0.0002989459,0.000046006862,0.00034407,0.00008753545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010696929,0.00006139189,0.00023802288,0.000023814979,0.000275545,0.000018413457,0.00008638026,0.000023828721,0.000042654156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002858518,0.0000407216,0.00008978546,0.00012603674,0.00033305876,0.00022227157,0.000014260783,0.000106795014,0.000010083478],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007076493,0.000040821036,0.008744433,0.000008546629,0.00016590061,0.000020186062,0.029932579,0.0000034483592,0.000015354939,0.93939203,0.021222753,0.00044687025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018206699,0.00006167183,0.0030897488,0.00008865778,0.000012483921,0.0000034903883,0.008196679,1.7070293e-7,0.000039359875,0.02018514,0.96808136,0.00005919426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013040386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005082457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9468586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010252631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011620385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34221193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236327344","doi":"10.1080/13572330008420634","title":"Book reviews","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Democracy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.145154533585428,"score_gpt":0.45532544251051577,"score_spread":0.31017090892508775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236327344","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044949967,0.43224323,0.00008151717,0.035647146,0.0010888659,0.00047292447,0.000002418451,0.000024508952,0.4854894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8840807,0.022996347,0.00019249663,0.0020028458,0.0026021802,0.0000073070996,1.2074324e-7,0.0000069420025,0.08811107],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988492,0.0003615136,0.00036216542,0.000044856028,0.0002181699,0.0001641049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992882,0.0001768182,0.00019055652,0.00003908013,0.00023400006,0.00007135574],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009453271,0.00005418176,0.00026181762,0.000028154336,0.00022110748,0.00001642691,0.000068972935,0.000023361446,0.0009523544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005477185,0.000036170004,0.00009434651,0.000117068645,0.0001901391,0.0003031902,0.0000044827552,0.00009259758,0.00009486735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046873258,0.00007674361,0.007543369,0.000045249064,0.00024066413,0.000016605907,0.083238244,0.000011097161,0.00007362331,0.023888323,0.8465713,0.038247857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008937548,0.00009540327,0.0013077436,0.000102111204,0.000016666338,0.0000011052875,0.000456931,5.004845e-7,0.000015219298,0.0021264446,0.9957444,0.000044073913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022743957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040135923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8391307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000077676574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049119706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251278139","doi":"10.1080/1357233042000322283","title":"The parliamentary activity of the head of government in ireland (1923–2000) in comparative perspective","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Irish; Government (linguistics); Perspective (graphical); Northern ireland; Accountability; Political science; Head (geology); Public administration; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Ethnology","score_opus":0.07149466536706303,"score_gpt":0.38951512279980033,"score_spread":0.3180204574327373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251278139","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97441113,0.0036151737,0.000011230446,0.006701728,0.00024524666,0.00020784413,0.000020672023,7.084193e-7,0.014786251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990095,0.00063478004,0.00002282454,0.000026232192,0.000081324,0.0000034390116,6.36671e-9,0.000002026415,0.00021990025],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828815,0.00037396423,0.00039386205,0.00007695419,0.00067677605,0.00019027026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832374,0.0007087218,0.0006783302,0.00007381541,0.00018624986,0.000029128603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009620325,0.00008362797,0.00039168508,0.000018678571,0.0001618851,0.0000077068125,0.00019470051,0.000027073651,0.000001783962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056428066,0.00004311123,0.000107347725,0.00024229042,0.00092088105,0.00018241929,0.000057034344,0.00023044476,2.8823845e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003572994,0.00050729275,0.26335517,0.000024018536,0.00045452293,0.000012225572,0.56122833,0.0004674562,0.0004144591,0.1723526,0.00032475454,0.0005018967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011016605,0.00023166873,0.7893685,0.00056991976,0.00001535647,0.0000012424961,0.18763027,0.000002156184,0.0010580932,0.016764872,0.0031856194,0.00007062388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031130377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14243314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5260134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015131573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023754156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9753214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318541381","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2023.2171542","title":"Opposition parties in times of pandemics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Parliament; Legislature; Solidarity; Politics; Psychological intervention; Political science; Pandemic; Political economy; Sociology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.16710286296449992,"score_gpt":0.44613955726674254,"score_spread":0.27903669430224265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318541381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98047817,0.0011246352,0.000021419062,0.0042816824,0.00033816355,0.000089399226,0.0000027528956,0.000010445397,0.0136533575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99885714,0.0002892008,0.000028139497,0.000016791779,0.00021169081,0.0000022697866,2.1978526e-7,0.0000022631652,0.00059228257],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899143,0.00023171927,0.00034866942,0.000037634378,0.00024219819,0.00014834967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998962,0.00042974696,0.00023453581,0.0000256429,0.00031548922,0.00003258133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001096692,0.000041566014,0.00021337587,0.00011082807,0.00008260306,0.0000073017804,0.000049343114,0.000029682149,0.000009182668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008268749,0.000031597036,0.000050534476,0.00033298423,0.000198391,0.00019367904,0.000012982868,0.000075951764,0.000004090335],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088938614,0.000087556145,0.55909,0.00010819528,0.00028544426,0.000021649732,0.21690482,0.0004177754,0.0013442422,0.20883778,0.010148087,0.0026655106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001665637,0.001410715,0.45774624,0.0017058965,0.00013142184,0.000003983694,0.12011404,0.00023990062,0.0033776672,0.3803977,0.032767214,0.0004395873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052686664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019913174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17155993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006525889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006487082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12884897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327844812","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2023.2190695","title":"Institutional change and partisanship in the Canadian Senate","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Political science; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Liberal Party; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Politics; Parliament","score_opus":0.39419581853591046,"score_gpt":0.4417479409554658,"score_spread":0.047552122419555365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4327844812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80248404,0.0036382503,0.0000033450367,0.11283207,0.00078047655,0.00021651568,0.000006906622,0.000004969342,0.080033444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981107,0.0010632311,0.0000102083595,0.00022724734,0.00033755272,0.000002904744,1.9254699e-7,0.0000010781223,0.00024689088],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934334,0.00015974308,0.000106879335,0.000036271464,0.0002157027,0.00013807054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996188,0.00013336587,0.0000594951,0.000020135918,0.0001240541,0.00004413741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010565631,0.000031014562,0.00007067472,0.00013184531,0.00044174842,0.00003121261,0.00005664583,0.000017735463,0.0000028240318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003123143,0.000019120678,0.000019530875,0.00023828982,0.00029122006,0.00014481606,0.0000103887,0.000091286995,0.000003500074],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029412604,0.000007643727,0.08474109,0.000008682009,0.000060051414,0.00010335862,0.785738,0.00002004625,0.0000060488283,0.124909565,0.0033668252,0.0010357714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021684906,0.000035039604,0.6566034,0.000055863587,0.000012716448,0.000010002177,0.23407577,0.00002080742,0.000007749287,0.039168708,0.06972777,0.000065335276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049203828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6407306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59152675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000771946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001902341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95712763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366140343","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2023.2202089","title":"Why would a majority agree to adopting supermajority rules when they empower a minority? The institutional choice of the National Assembly of Korea","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Academy of Korean Studies","keywords":"Legislature; Lawmaking; Legislation; Newspaper; Sociology; Law; Economics; Law and economics; Political science","score_opus":0.16975394024585733,"score_gpt":0.4220214127768845,"score_spread":0.25226747253102716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366140343","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95901954,0.0003468792,0.000047176803,0.028955743,0.0006055551,0.00025763593,0.00005191985,0.00000867533,0.010706858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984714,0.000020791531,0.0001292365,0.0003145012,0.00074087357,0.0000058812893,5.1864856e-7,0.000003341174,0.00031349118],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974618,0.0005084731,0.0005538071,0.00009624836,0.0011428682,0.00023682199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962558,0.0013230582,0.0004529336,0.0000793573,0.0018235795,0.00006528608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022709898,0.000101802514,0.00030342984,0.00009310409,0.0006108653,0.000025892325,0.00031356554,0.00007653643,0.000011324529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005748368,0.00005568629,0.00018333753,0.0004360331,0.00051299686,0.0003091561,0.00011199904,0.0003117318,0.0000038124062],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010109941,0.0002335349,0.54193705,0.00016479028,0.00097307307,0.0000049380383,0.15362112,0.0004819707,0.0023566044,0.27021375,0.02933626,0.00057579624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045381516,0.00020674295,0.8986961,0.0003923502,0.00009874828,0.0000034401617,0.007719109,0.00003737847,0.00039563267,0.032265782,0.05956182,0.00016908717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007351671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016970435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35675904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016845467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031932638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99925846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384133609","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2023.2233207","title":"Conscientiousness of representatives and agreement with their party positions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Conscientiousness; Loyalty; Dissent; Political science; House of Representatives; Ideology; Unison; Social psychology; Personality; Big Five personality traits; Public relations; Law; Psychology; Extraversion and introversion; Politics","score_opus":0.12343329856319771,"score_gpt":0.4344024705019436,"score_spread":0.31096917193874585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384133609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863166,0.00072670757,0.00014924268,0.0049614,0.00014577166,0.00012970553,0.000009813015,0.0000074192353,0.0075533474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99894416,0.00014332862,0.000059562335,0.000014350296,0.000093963994,0.000003809015,2.8796677e-7,0.0000019622319,0.0007385591],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910164,0.00022695298,0.00023118437,0.000059211736,0.0002481735,0.0001328353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986617,0.00046299121,0.00025103008,0.00003673152,0.0005354494,0.000052106006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007037211,0.000048799222,0.0001954887,0.00007609772,0.00025829184,0.000015635052,0.000042441552,0.000013908887,0.000009351785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028600928,0.000029294706,0.000034836932,0.000315124,0.0007023157,0.00018041543,0.000019364921,0.000052028732,0.0000011601443],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011155744,0.00013692996,0.420528,0.000108223234,0.0011060521,0.000024103547,0.42210248,0.000108617576,0.0026226714,0.14575982,0.0059961095,0.0013954351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018375419,0.0020242152,0.5824251,0.0010069927,0.00020963183,0.000011483867,0.33153948,0.000046285724,0.004313376,0.06381909,0.012432753,0.00033406302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003441598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016585287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16189711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026363687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006121374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25877115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391772215","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2024.2313310","title":"Governments and parliaments in a state of emergency: what can we learn from the COVID-19 pandemic?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Socio-political and Technological Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); State of emergency; Political science; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; State (computer science); Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Public administration; Virology; Medicine; Law; Computer science; Politics; Outbreak","score_opus":0.16306645707218942,"score_gpt":0.4247199404289856,"score_spread":0.26165348335679617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391772215","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8685444,0.08904493,0.000025843647,0.040823087,0.00055450643,0.00012428434,0.000028627355,0.000017291937,0.0008370022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8869858,0.11220073,0.00003831998,0.00017987042,0.00010938906,0.0000032091752,1.2079818e-7,0.0000032760317,0.0004793161],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987003,0.0002356288,0.00034065405,0.000111703834,0.00042882757,0.00018283818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847895,0.0011506024,0.0001627277,0.000047317706,0.00008402021,0.000076399454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072231743,0.00008735776,0.00027456987,0.000036016227,0.00016284345,0.00004495932,0.00015603169,0.000042525648,0.000048542945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015903681,0.000048162565,0.0000686981,0.00021878976,0.00066168106,0.000277102,0.00009606027,0.00025742938,0.0000015269962],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004126178,0.000066082226,0.4920374,0.00004383721,0.0007020827,0.000064808206,0.4656787,0.0000041674257,0.00007887568,0.007933979,0.0019553471,0.031393453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000352631,0.00018213944,0.022602152,0.00039445687,0.000057655194,0.0000011324051,0.3716174,0.000005351591,0.00003323283,0.5046807,0.09995658,0.000116582545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020508505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004855279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49674672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024327262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000865621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3100286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400873207","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2024.2381155","title":"Gender and legislative committees in Africa: a study of Rwanda and South Africa","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Legislature; Political science; Gender studies; Economic growth; Geography; Public administration; Development economics; Socioeconomics; Sociology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.15478117206927114,"score_gpt":0.389906272070032,"score_spread":0.23512510000076084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400873207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87432945,0.03934864,0.00009630448,0.0010874226,0.00039728748,0.00034980834,0.000009983086,0.000009401437,0.08437169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982025,0.00088900176,0.00012032408,0.000005216334,0.00014781737,0.000003605138,5.530147e-8,0.000005716797,0.00062574947],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986032,0.00033523224,0.00036939382,0.00013548355,0.00037625592,0.00018039045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886745,0.00054770836,0.00019816392,0.000048476097,0.00028283618,0.000055338445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010155641,0.00010105848,0.00033573492,0.00025202968,0.0001820483,0.00005821643,0.00006715315,0.000033889224,0.0000049770965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030467368,0.00007157728,0.000043865948,0.00029478507,0.00045880792,0.000264524,0.000074195246,0.00019700597,3.9618993e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017421959,0.00008312095,0.025630921,0.000037044654,0.0003966675,0.00003276818,0.96635616,0.000011715097,0.000022326314,0.006571177,0.00042380433,0.00041688423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006142546,0.00038743997,0.05571405,0.000108743974,0.00008728781,0.000003246666,0.92370784,0.000027163127,0.00000987996,0.013971324,0.0052775894,0.000091170725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017783493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004486737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.123873055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048475802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010642256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29188368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403129625","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2024.2411479","title":"Let's talk about something else: how cabinet members divert issue attention in answers to parliamentary questions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cabinet (room); Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06753322322091648,"score_gpt":0.4168802095524323,"score_spread":0.34934698633151584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403129625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.847838,0.01260352,0.0006407775,0.12731127,0.0037355707,0.0004939007,0.000019280278,0.00004851719,0.0073091807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958003,0.00028530482,0.0002316295,0.00021169195,0.00096913293,0.000011545796,7.4991436e-7,0.0000076059505,0.002482043],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839646,0.0003839223,0.00034983447,0.0001315198,0.0004474115,0.00029086063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990514,0.00038281557,0.00012326619,0.00004857002,0.00026961113,0.00012436794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012916955,0.00010711979,0.0002772254,0.00023244353,0.00026410067,0.00013324952,0.00009400191,0.00004896926,0.000052093066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073231437,0.00008531646,0.000101839396,0.00049372803,0.00017514807,0.0007580771,0.000030013642,0.00024400518,0.000013047114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013058742,0.00029881817,0.16987327,0.000515133,0.0019928883,0.00049079,0.5918395,0.0015269902,0.0051618633,0.06574879,0.12242412,0.03999725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008250342,0.0010467683,0.110689975,0.0042954492,0.00029607964,0.000013528326,0.13664737,0.00023092976,0.00026062145,0.013500343,0.7314923,0.0007016214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010906579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027477043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60906816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005073467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000099666824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99567986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409493846","doi":"10.1080/13572334.2025.2488540","title":"Legislative influence in House of Commons committees in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legislative Studies","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Columbia College","funders":"","keywords":"House of Commons; Legislature; House of Representatives; Political science; Commons; Public administration; Law; Politics; Parliament","score_opus":0.03078921293381114,"score_gpt":0.3508149797923369,"score_spread":0.32002576685852574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409493846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9248331,0.00470143,0.000018910241,0.006996075,0.00034650124,0.00015500265,0.00001555539,0.0000033217439,0.06293008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987383,0.000501787,0.00004847036,0.00015841132,0.00004503603,0.0000032006612,2.4556071e-8,0.0000034425536,0.0005013174],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819493,0.00037459822,0.000672775,0.00008519667,0.00040460392,0.00026790216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975842,0.0013733357,0.0004785246,0.00007918315,0.00043620222,0.00004855143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082940335,0.00009774368,0.0005511181,0.00013541114,0.00009705286,0.00001034667,0.00024838315,0.000034131994,0.0000029718005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023710653,0.00007888782,0.000056040415,0.0005738785,0.00045709466,0.00030831672,0.00006346071,0.00028178288,3.4911113e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031498017,0.00005064089,0.860711,0.00003721017,0.00011699987,0.00004579806,0.046118785,0.00025146615,0.000022101609,0.08972236,0.00248967,0.00040251465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064148294,0.00005434857,0.9150735,0.001152251,0.00001134052,6.9225365e-7,0.029486187,0.000006213689,0.00007451725,0.008484734,0.044910427,0.00010426749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95909995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08123762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010531371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019216761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34089708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}