{"meta":{"query_hash":"2050787b95c0","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science"},"cohort_total":40,"direct_labels_cover":3,"predictions_cover":40,"exported":40,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/2050787b95c0","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Librarianship+and+Information+Science"},"results":[{"id":"W1974778606","doi":"10.1177/0961000612470278","title":"The effect of public library use on the social capital of rural communities","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Social capital; Capital (architecture); Sociology; Social mobility; Socioeconomics; Economic growth; Social science; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.044855848173611726,"score_gpt":0.2778496523708132,"score_spread":0.2329938041972015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974778606","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9709873,0.000021120362,0.000016491804,0.016234158,0.00019988573,0.00014091967,0.0000037114876,0.000006043206,0.012390359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993143,0.00011531624,0.000029356743,0.00037925277,0.00007163117,0.000001969371,9.807535e-7,0.0000013917789,0.00008578614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826133,0.00034488464,0.00044698958,0.000020611473,0.0007529054,0.00017327622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773127,0.0012933454,0.00063046004,0.00010394076,0.00014965906,0.000091352325],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025657783,0.000060616363,0.000111855334,0.00017180732,0.0013816975,0.0018655537,0.00085042394,0.00003770202,0.000089239664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005837764,0.000029003228,0.000057083722,0.0007345402,0.0023892147,0.06538789,0.00006834564,0.00015497721,0.0000042846195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004785267,0.0000164756,0.07800148,0.000015679552,0.000010675368,1.0432119e-7,0.123493664,0.0000046793675,0.00019699216,0.7743428,0.0034044064,0.020465238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053027656,0.0013502459,0.4445634,0.00010199846,0.000011776059,0.000008721937,0.5182106,0.00027742158,0.0070900638,0.007947361,0.019738369,0.00016978702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010095904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000039162337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7663954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008210542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005618819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983498378","doi":"10.1177/0961000611426215","title":"An examination of Canadian information professionals’ involvement in the provision of business information synthesis and analysis services","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Information Architecture and Usability","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Information needs; Context (archaeology); Information system; Business information; Business; Computer science; Marketing; World Wide Web; Engineering","score_opus":0.022450563315982077,"score_gpt":0.23099484604245835,"score_spread":0.20854428272647627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983498378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9434037,0.000011210313,0.05111515,0.00068601884,0.00010169796,0.00029783318,0.00001405947,0.0000073365113,0.0043629794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922207,0.000031984146,0.007148966,0.0005780201,0.0000050596436,0.000004518282,0.000009937205,6.1243634e-7,1.9524056e-7],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978714,0.00011780382,0.0011136165,0.00005108848,0.0007084379,0.00013764609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746954,0.00010004581,0.0011852352,0.00024226714,0.00089365675,0.000109268],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043098787,0.000088931,0.00018197022,0.0041188304,0.00015707532,0.000325503,0.00076877925,0.000055880606,0.0000076180095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022271283,0.00005726704,0.0000314567,0.0046081226,0.00014734658,0.08193575,0.00007073228,0.00011292671,9.3821774e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008443779,0.00011211181,0.06292604,0.0007265723,0.000039917843,3.74315e-7,0.4780856,0.0009021121,0.000077876306,0.11200305,0.0000226705,0.34501922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019519561,0.000104640545,0.9581507,0.00006460688,0.00001976447,0.000007001593,0.009324593,0.029846527,0.0013745239,0.0004752909,0.00036419375,0.00007297579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013027992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034372302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89522463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029927605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000492367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93090475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983529390","doi":"10.1177/0961000610390992","title":"The importance of pleasure reading in the lives of young teens: Self-identification, self-construction and self-awareness","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Media Influence and Health","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Pleasure; Reading (process); Salience (neuroscience); Psychology; Personal identity; Identity (music); Social psychology; Everyday life; Developmental psychology; Self-concept; Aesthetics; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.04565344191007474,"score_gpt":0.251537956404161,"score_spread":0.20588451449408623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983529390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905022,0.0001879496,0.00005357257,0.00032945484,0.00029833693,0.00012515823,0.0000033499389,0.000008037419,0.008491963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980984,0.0009880795,0.0007088065,0.00013706228,0.000059311784,0.0000021989458,3.822439e-7,0.0000014439873,0.0000043576215],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868816,0.000052627125,0.0007437428,0.000049722792,0.00035651785,0.00010923402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840724,0.00012722802,0.0009594124,0.00011588423,0.00034747747,0.00004277558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025910214,0.000057393216,0.00011677541,0.00022044257,0.00041052783,0.0002591104,0.00028230154,0.000021765562,0.000011841026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001444742,0.000031682222,0.00002044954,0.0002025274,0.00041503482,0.008822751,0.000018298919,0.00012316223,6.219905e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019119312,0.00002730311,0.24738593,0.0001120195,0.000009011435,3.4910394e-7,0.5035249,8.9550736e-7,0.000029556137,0.24742216,0.00006004508,0.0014087207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004952394,0.00024257519,0.73989254,0.00019863267,0.00004193781,0.00015157854,0.24122195,0.00046320207,0.0009766951,0.007959924,0.008216603,0.00013913716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032221877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028134418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4925066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012402006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031690855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6396282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002568896","doi":"10.1177/0961000612448208","title":"Books in their suitcases: Leisure reading in the lives of Russian-speaking immigrants in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Acculturation; Reading (process); Sociology; Gender studies; Identity (music); Psychology; Political science; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.02664170467081403,"score_gpt":0.26043518655469616,"score_spread":0.23379348188388213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002568896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98512685,0.00034518662,0.000043035692,0.00068060285,0.00024064867,0.00009249615,0.0000017043558,0.0000015824875,0.013467872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992441,0.00026265404,0.00015010915,0.00028666886,0.000048370213,0.0000011853141,2.1577152e-7,0.0000012817883,0.0000054253032],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983632,0.00012547766,0.00060358417,0.000043136515,0.000578926,0.00028567653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992065,0.00022317294,0.0003726001,0.00006281417,0.000043588785,0.000091313304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042669154,0.00006364605,0.00015402137,0.00045840172,0.000144027,0.00015546635,0.00039677863,0.00002961535,0.000010445647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028058776,0.000041408588,0.000022388247,0.0009391269,0.00016590388,0.011663976,0.000030395213,0.00019604215,4.0042067e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015259253,0.000012157377,0.53545845,0.000010425806,0.000001278136,0.0000036713288,0.45509145,0.000018838671,0.000013263722,0.004119449,0.00006681518,0.005188969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018088351,0.000012322441,0.7329432,0.00011698192,8.944704e-7,0.000011517827,0.26339486,0.00005083866,0.00009728991,0.00017258825,0.0029661562,0.000052473544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2522613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26836392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19748478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001746879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023593055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84561014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007456749","doi":"10.1177/0961000615572404","title":"An exploration of the relationship between undergraduate students’ library book borrowing and academic achievement","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Exploratory research; Academic achievement; Positive correlation; Psychology; Foreign language; Order (exchange); Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.1044895617445111,"score_gpt":0.30147423236810883,"score_spread":0.19698467062359773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007456749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91789985,0.00021729206,0.062689036,0.013679944,0.00034095754,0.0001884529,0.000001930373,0.00003879808,0.0049437247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995912,0.000049148308,0.0030607225,0.0008168736,0.00004114109,0.0000011045629,9.863254e-7,0.0000021777075,0.00011582358],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983017,0.00007544216,0.0005684786,0.000085073625,0.000853437,0.00011591115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988471,0.00016406934,0.00053079455,0.00014856999,0.000091963004,0.00021749084],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010371122,0.000077158336,0.000109275206,0.00043512075,0.00023867856,0.0012677748,0.00097406213,0.00004157576,9.2130733e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028507187,0.00005133196,0.000023033934,0.0012174634,0.00016353172,0.19053863,0.00031991274,0.0001792411,0.0000012068846],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013548087,0.000009809738,0.89957106,0.000009912772,0.000004118337,1.8766218e-7,0.00538307,0.00005583054,0.00001637895,0.09150788,0.00068081403,0.0027474035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053870433,0.00019590063,0.9482121,0.00006910251,0.000005569431,0.00001177952,0.00095191103,0.00076597,0.0015806371,0.039217614,0.008345077,0.00010567588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":4.8997526e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.306758e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18927085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017583465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057263626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013520707","doi":"10.1177/0961000603353002","title":"Canadian Federal Prison Libraries","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Staffing; Prison; Administration (probate law); Context (archaeology); Recreation; Maximum security; Library science; Political science; Business; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.022412169802675852,"score_gpt":0.27422646103048814,"score_spread":0.2518142912278123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013520707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63073,0.00025547107,0.00410036,0.005196483,0.0010817132,0.00008835251,0.0000023477678,0.000017783219,0.3585275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99742204,0.00021463663,0.0012891605,0.000839607,0.000068550835,4.745163e-7,2.887844e-7,0.0000012462066,0.00016399434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989628,0.000059929454,0.00029280444,0.00004543144,0.00042925918,0.00020975311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990378,0.00006463382,0.00020018501,0.000060135633,0.0002632359,0.00037400238],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014385515,0.00004843681,0.00008960589,0.0006634113,0.0011906215,0.0014791305,0.000226038,0.000039960545,0.00017077281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009400755,0.0000407776,0.00003857792,0.0011636142,0.00030455962,0.024234952,0.000010178194,0.00011789356,0.000011544007],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014500601,0.000014392,0.027468598,0.000011749507,0.000011476121,0.000003613471,0.07604158,0.00004406867,0.000022390333,0.83371854,0.0020786778,0.060570404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018109831,0.00007884794,0.009084749,0.000024229636,0.000031566055,0.000044232034,0.3650349,0.000110766174,0.00024328136,0.0026721072,0.62235767,0.00013656465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01164548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009045298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83104646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008739572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003262741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017044565","doi":"10.1177/0961000614566339","title":"Micro-blogging practices in Canadian public libraries: A national snapshot","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Networks of Centres of Excellence of Canada","keywords":"Snapshot (computer storage); Public relations; Perspective (graphical); Social media; Library science; Population; Sociology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.14760084152803687,"score_gpt":0.36450953926015595,"score_spread":0.21690869773211907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017044565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61792433,0.00021112597,0.00006393885,0.06486459,0.0015668505,0.00013969591,0.000008724679,0.000012988053,0.31520775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959086,0.00007132922,0.0011379404,0.002555758,0.000300005,0.0000011400184,0.0000021139072,0.0000015835589,0.000021517917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981992,0.00013178818,0.00038410584,0.00005133535,0.0008769106,0.0003566325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976184,0.00033252986,0.00056416576,0.000042677315,0.0005888533,0.0008533817],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047282716,0.000053834276,0.00010048036,0.00096533506,0.00040260013,0.001397098,0.00040631613,0.00007130229,0.00005295208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01597582,0.000048764512,0.000019477993,0.0013068888,0.0005661441,0.042564847,0.000027466296,0.00019430519,0.0000078851535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001199701,0.000012180712,0.21699938,0.0000069028342,0.000003853339,0.0000036089225,0.108508125,0.0000044800604,0.000016190397,0.6681117,0.004269403,0.0020521944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042413783,0.00004533168,0.016643189,0.000028868244,0.0000034204224,0.000024097204,0.09848424,0.00016474268,0.00007786287,0.017542917,0.86644584,0.0001153294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014521152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077976948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8621765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026397718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020397255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025669722","doi":"10.1177/0961000608092551","title":"Children's conceptualizations of the word `Information'","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Word (group theory); Action (physics); Psychology; Term (time); Social psychology; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.018702450355614866,"score_gpt":0.25293066666420627,"score_spread":0.23422821630859142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025669722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8400052,0.00009061305,0.0042769075,0.013439316,0.0016625846,0.0004291192,0.000031941167,0.000037024085,0.14002728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948714,0.00024103266,0.0010137566,0.00365923,0.00010020969,8.912186e-7,0.0000022485247,0.000001087054,0.00011014617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977881,0.00006727135,0.00082393666,0.0000376714,0.0010981762,0.00018485193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795127,0.000091261914,0.0010160198,0.00014669176,0.0006265528,0.000168219],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013322562,0.00006761585,0.00012167678,0.00044714526,0.0012375772,0.0003964587,0.0008565026,0.00004548591,0.00010445686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010131986,0.00004404879,0.00006598881,0.002208057,0.0020183963,0.20262097,0.00008124874,0.0001338032,0.000014039289],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017124483,0.000017717253,0.088227615,0.000011204097,0.00000767207,1.3291297e-7,0.13705158,0.00017973785,0.000015144242,0.7584081,0.0069013797,0.009162565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053941377,0.00006309461,0.52668214,0.000054755743,0.000007375608,0.000076660785,0.014791716,0.00024871138,0.00062216894,0.0012644225,0.45550737,0.00014216291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002302208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.790125e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7571437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024910696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017594127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95185685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074440227","doi":"10.1177/0961000614537514","title":"Highly cited articles in the Information Science and Library Science category in Social Science Citation Index: A bibliometric analysis","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Science Citation Index; Citation; Index (typography); Citation index; Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; Social science; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.21762042173316584,"score_gpt":0.44022398578710153,"score_spread":0.2226035640539357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074440227","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9777956,0.00007220062,0.0042842673,0.0026587546,0.00025741334,0.00021788028,0.000005331743,0.000010737153,0.014697822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978488,0.00013897388,0.00081008085,0.0011472789,0.000042437456,0.0000040299205,8.614404e-7,0.0000022881563,0.0000052700016],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97614926,0.0002352186,0.0019560985,0.00043637113,0.020311812,0.0009112244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98881865,0.0023828803,0.0014587777,0.00050428027,0.0061990665,0.0006363481],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13475533,0.00016921131,0.000363032,0.7385088,0.0018410799,0.028982788,0.005764049,0.00007850919,0.000021029175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.069291055,0.000105485495,0.000064936976,0.9295562,0.0075080507,0.20164187,0.000983951,0.00050508586,0.000012642474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006218634,0.00006690222,0.6167582,0.000012590973,0.000004114356,0.0000017920512,0.010504383,0.00032253438,0.0013198117,0.08088075,0.00023197617,0.2898347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052740425,0.00013860743,0.9147722,0.000010200516,0.000007037128,0.000019905048,0.0045822393,0.07188814,0.0007074349,0.005960781,0.0012515157,0.00013450698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004227716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000026949883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.298014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022628697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041607064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090115366","doi":"10.1177/09610006110430020602","title":"Book review: Urban Teens in the Library: Research and Practice Denise E Agosto and Sandra Hughes-Hassell (eds). Chicago, IL: American Library Association, 2010.208pp, $60.00. ISBN 9780838910153","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Association (psychology); Sociology; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.06377714290038797,"score_gpt":0.3379339872252108,"score_spread":0.2741568443248228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090115366","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.096608326,0.055246856,0.00010410897,0.49319068,0.0007501314,0.0016862578,0.000048055634,0.000111200825,0.3522544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4567224,0.40857357,0.0050985343,0.12190111,0.000910724,0.00002943543,0.00001659116,0.000028698832,0.0067189503],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960691,0.0008615482,0.00079957215,0.00021242506,0.0015753789,0.00048199552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967801,0.0013991594,0.0009946175,0.00019046632,0.00024854104,0.00038714687],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008570519,0.00014669885,0.00026446817,0.00059960666,0.0011190068,0.0024844015,0.0009197541,0.00009269807,0.00025712495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028294825,0.0001027724,0.00004059174,0.0029555005,0.0018700715,0.11786744,0.00017142527,0.0005923509,0.000014032894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021832302,0.00013829563,0.0641108,0.00010409318,0.000016585716,0.000023945793,0.100163616,4.425783e-7,0.00006207229,0.035483032,0.7920959,0.007582872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024658232,0.0004504455,0.09330274,0.00017701203,0.000013058002,0.00005367549,0.0162217,0.000017792052,0.000104386476,0.0014885715,0.887774,0.00015006027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000090076195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000051658053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37128958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030628493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016122742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99855113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113915914","doi":"10.1177/0961000612470277","title":"Social capital and inclusion in rural public libraries: A qualitative approach","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Social capital; Cohesion (chemistry); Qualitative research; Rural area; Inclusion (mineral); Sociology; Qualitative property; Public relations; Library science; Economic growth; Political science; Social science; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.052610389730495866,"score_gpt":0.3289064287388581,"score_spread":0.27629603900836225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113915914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93744254,0.00006246168,0.00045369158,0.0207073,0.00011413112,0.00016566546,0.000001561752,0.000011979908,0.04104067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971515,0.000068753485,0.001738018,0.0008877831,0.00010009727,0.000003055997,0.000001861754,0.0000015313,0.00004743112],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814916,0.00017375154,0.00047732375,0.00007642707,0.00087124377,0.00025206964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990541,0.0001357599,0.00035949415,0.000044531018,0.00017310999,0.00023304552],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030423673,0.00007461533,0.00013337618,0.00053901144,0.0018346665,0.0021927755,0.00046477624,0.00006763646,0.000046459572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005455633,0.000058064415,0.000024399242,0.0012739028,0.0013145084,0.12757508,0.0005716744,0.00016617274,0.0000038272765],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007958286,0.000017113562,0.0031994805,0.0000070280503,0.0000012463657,2.6326572e-7,0.5948181,5.083986e-7,0.00007013122,0.38877273,0.00027096464,0.0128344605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066378515,0.00018699036,0.075203314,0.000032262302,0.0000029849002,0.000017226343,0.7856264,0.0007713759,0.00009672885,0.12925619,0.007931184,0.00021152833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000111373934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005379474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25951654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032194057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00112929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143847359","doi":"10.1177/0961000611435253","title":"Public library use of free e-resources","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; World Wide Web; Public access; Commons; Collection development; Library science; Computer science; Public relations; Political science","score_opus":0.058131365415541446,"score_gpt":0.21083780468012506,"score_spread":0.1527064392645836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143847359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80525756,0.0005598814,0.04809867,0.008651228,0.0012923229,0.00016805797,0.000008315499,0.00011751205,0.13584642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.972081,0.000075238044,0.026462313,0.0010485561,0.00007452923,6.6224027e-7,5.344782e-7,0.0000025717718,0.0002545713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984127,0.00003289611,0.0005844706,0.00006120346,0.00067377964,0.00023492047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856114,0.00018744635,0.00057420996,0.00021768795,0.00013585378,0.00032364333],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062516535,0.00008476643,0.00013959607,0.0010419555,0.00016587097,0.0025392964,0.001201195,0.000037710535,0.00003296165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005541458,0.000061754865,0.000047265203,0.0020283107,0.00022005076,0.28710875,0.00049961323,0.00010374196,0.0000051628135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004495559,0.00009017452,0.2710355,0.000047178986,0.000023337188,0.0000012929229,0.011505853,0.000021778502,0.00019537311,0.63575166,0.019491917,0.06179098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005847911,0.0001789506,0.33292508,0.00005038314,0.0000041938783,0.00014321391,0.00041484594,0.0015258393,0.007299193,0.004834706,0.6518163,0.00022247758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":7.2650283e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.8290788e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6323244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008654443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000398837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150964667","doi":"10.1177/0961000607077574","title":"Alternative careers for graduates of LIS schools","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Sociology; Medical education; Political science; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.033137862200129715,"score_gpt":0.320630469108391,"score_spread":0.2874926069082613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150964667","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8297092,0.00015291538,0.06127271,0.011919796,0.002130248,0.000603635,0.000038119237,0.0000336347,0.09413974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911273,0.00012042656,0.0069060256,0.0016197453,0.00015939774,9.097398e-7,0.0000017464919,0.0000015462308,0.00006290289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808097,0.00002495381,0.0007663875,0.00005312537,0.0008287691,0.00024580755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997726,0.00026494617,0.00086552557,0.000078216464,0.00081609184,0.00024918816],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005099308,0.000064198204,0.0001367251,0.0007379934,0.00042527937,0.0005439259,0.00057779695,0.000041102085,0.00002423755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014517942,0.000049739167,0.000060954284,0.0011853825,0.00063501793,0.13888566,0.000036529953,0.00010815709,0.0000033285332],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081627186,0.000013561092,0.01042456,0.000028527673,0.000007631329,4.2512448e-7,0.060718257,0.00003494977,0.00016424162,0.892069,0.0014050148,0.03505224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020888734,0.00091750186,0.072628155,0.00025599846,0.000024559859,0.000035719073,0.15465905,0.0014881997,0.027274933,0.055988867,0.68418515,0.00045296934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038730064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.491163e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8360801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003480854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085521693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8731583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2212117881","doi":"10.1177/0961000615622680","title":"The social library in three contexts: Programmes and perspectives","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Witness; Globalization; Sociology; National library; Political science; Public relations; Social science; Library science","score_opus":0.06253854560176539,"score_gpt":0.3203320947329508,"score_spread":0.25779354913118546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2212117881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8587183,0.0009083942,0.000159959,0.07580202,0.00036368376,0.000208027,0.0000019009784,0.000022843766,0.06381487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99871933,0.00030503428,0.0003840422,0.00037534564,0.00014349878,0.0000012408441,2.420829e-7,0.0000011819698,0.000070089365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884546,0.00006975907,0.0003051126,0.000058793994,0.0005393026,0.00018155492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992924,0.00011785187,0.00024754214,0.000041407642,0.000117460004,0.00018336215],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023673393,0.000049630667,0.00007918862,0.00019106893,0.0007967703,0.0021890774,0.00034994117,0.000036301615,0.0000060532343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005665585,0.00003146414,0.000017521965,0.0008316227,0.0015364725,0.060371544,0.00005123801,0.00012326855,0.0000015655467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052532887,0.000013912572,0.06210481,0.000003117379,0.0000018970818,0.0000013387543,0.14762893,9.582991e-7,0.000005751175,0.72983617,0.0009312436,0.059419334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007076887,0.00026025335,0.33272898,0.000030818694,0.0000036099127,0.000019815485,0.41322646,0.00019492459,0.00006591172,0.051665165,0.20095752,0.00013886418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001599378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024437306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.678171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019000288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015310848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99884677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2417562882","doi":"10.1177/0961000615595455","title":"Scaffolding in information search: Effects on less experienced searchers","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Information Retrieval and Search Behavior","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Point (geometry); Computer science; Information literacy; Information retrieval; Psychology; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.07725841982653249,"score_gpt":0.29954955563012736,"score_spread":0.22229113580359489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2417562882","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8931717,0.000020501278,0.09381999,0.0016999362,0.00062467926,0.00025471923,0.0000013548215,0.0000353349,0.010371732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936562,0.000021641441,0.0050975354,0.0011816031,0.000029856568,0.0000033743638,0.0000010471127,0.0000014918788,0.0000072348867],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971915,0.000087275475,0.0006963834,0.000075826974,0.0016197606,0.0003292823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983167,0.0001454248,0.00031647857,0.00019043022,0.0006038628,0.00042712304],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040534446,0.00010756352,0.00016051586,0.0017144145,0.00017359146,0.0016455126,0.0010037777,0.000057940073,0.000002835763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079493213,0.000082241786,0.000035432346,0.0022219198,0.00018089802,0.09974726,0.00019827389,0.00030096195,0.000035438145],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024308899,0.00005644931,0.0074047754,0.00011237476,0.000005982212,0.000015394638,0.12693498,0.0020983126,0.00048428113,0.3066717,0.0006689697,0.5553037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01615739,0.0062945215,0.3449966,0.0012408294,0.000014498389,0.0008205711,0.07006219,0.35017774,0.15721738,0.0069326567,0.044237778,0.0018478371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008990866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.8766175e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5534558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014895694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010273032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2463394480","doi":"10.1177/0961000616654961","title":"Motivations for choosing librarianship as a second career among students at the University of British Columbia and the University of Hong Kong","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Career Pathways; Perception; Graduate students; Career development; Pedagogy; Psychology; Medical education; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.015110198167183434,"score_gpt":0.220689709198715,"score_spread":0.20557951103153158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2463394480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9867752,0.000044444332,0.001305255,0.0035106682,0.00013872549,0.00025827825,0.00004739215,0.000006382633,0.007913653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99675906,0.00022568178,0.00028729663,0.00034176136,0.000028901522,1.4349892e-7,0.0000010836965,0.0000014747341,0.0023546144],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986783,0.000116819865,0.00035101065,0.00007208281,0.00061804836,0.00016368367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981296,0.0005416289,0.00074047677,0.0001132598,0.00034020707,0.0001348308],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002480512,0.000048825514,0.00014366,0.000120179146,0.0014705478,0.00069871766,0.0008027274,0.000048494207,0.00029722595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046672346,0.000038259215,0.00006472331,0.0006775321,0.0031475374,0.06587823,0.00017206397,0.00008003936,0.000001950874],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020565785,0.000024893974,0.79961836,0.00006034464,0.000036298694,9.93946e-7,0.12509048,0.000017744065,0.000091154194,0.043599676,0.01205343,0.01920095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015366672,0.000059305337,0.9063859,0.00014597455,0.00001697296,0.000009318857,0.043835975,0.00012577057,0.00005144031,0.0014114494,0.04634469,0.000076529905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008628568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041239616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10676753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036567897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056031457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750568998","doi":"10.1177/0961000617726120","title":"Behavior and informal learning at night in a 24-hour space: A case study of the Hong Kong Design Institute Library","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Educational Environments and Student Outcomes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Evening; Space (punctuation); Informal learning; Mathematics education; Psychology; Medical education; Pedagogy; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.05790859514956412,"score_gpt":0.3281882639685683,"score_spread":0.2702796688190042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2750568998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.993518,0.000022146995,0.00004736111,0.0016882339,0.00031944155,0.00021377421,6.445954e-7,0.000002864349,0.0041875145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990897,0.00011328752,0.00032217352,0.00009480454,0.000035826717,0.0000027049593,1.00223325e-7,0.0000016509698,0.00033973914],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875754,0.00008224643,0.00039254245,0.00005484924,0.0005775456,0.00013528595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897873,0.000083135805,0.0006799779,0.00011205206,0.00003821764,0.000107889144],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014566227,0.00006249939,0.00011755652,0.00020304439,0.001833065,0.00076927454,0.00044250314,0.00003395755,0.000016829512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040752103,0.00004120149,0.00002273959,0.00021946765,0.00065898907,0.02950924,0.00025150058,0.0001810079,6.0240654e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012619802,0.00003888888,0.9344912,0.0000039545043,0.000002905543,0.00001233692,0.061126553,0.00013937823,0.000006736455,0.0024244827,0.000028078553,0.001712874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048245644,0.000086963104,0.9427003,0.000026917609,0.000008641725,0.0000945841,0.05291027,0.000068050926,0.00002570353,0.00003321485,0.0035096954,0.000053179396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013890825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007291681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028739965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027600387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003944591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770448539","doi":"10.1177/0961000617742465","title":"Data science in data librarianship: Core competencies of a data librarian","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Data Quality and Management","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Data curation; Computer science; Data management; Metadata; Data science; World Wide Web; Library science; Database","score_opus":0.6056634588857582,"score_gpt":0.47246913967965815,"score_spread":0.1331943192061001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770448539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45278817,0.0015077045,0.10127295,0.10950895,0.012743524,0.002619591,0.022334628,0.00015009029,0.29707438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9663391,0.00038927724,0.031756528,0.0010655327,0.00014269237,6.584871e-7,0.00019603314,0.0000063089874,0.00010385421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918983,0.00014178111,0.0024775018,0.00073447684,0.0042809783,0.00046696272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98285264,0.0010000601,0.0037554111,0.011360758,0.00060288125,0.00042823027],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.043919627,0.00019019085,0.0005286026,0.002097925,0.001086042,0.010158893,0.054271508,0.00007147681,0.00011046506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03076707,0.00013668778,0.000029939685,0.0027159362,0.0044203415,0.4350524,0.025202278,0.0003817633,0.00002671035],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036925325,0.0002726261,0.09727208,0.00016163482,0.000036559613,0.000037447244,0.006460982,0.00006164095,0.00072022,0.5059407,0.06204803,0.32661885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001467256,0.0001602205,0.5025309,0.00028264057,0.0000316793,0.00008942857,0.009965533,0.060971122,0.00019710803,0.021315897,0.40261498,0.00037323724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006561949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000051105584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51355094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024127414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003123035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99828905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790255339","doi":"10.1177/0961000618757298","title":"Exploring Becoming, Doing, and Relating within the information professions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Information science; Identification (biology); Professional development; Information professional; Professional studies; Professional association; Sociology; Public relations; Library science; Medical education; Political science; Pedagogy; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.10039145631986662,"score_gpt":0.3188859326842066,"score_spread":0.21849447636434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790255339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8341027,0.000037119564,0.0031628055,0.019791935,0.0019218116,0.00028581306,0.0000030302688,0.000045535387,0.14064927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99117863,0.00013141401,0.003654209,0.004705293,0.0002532516,0.000003232615,8.5122355e-7,0.0000015377648,0.00007157191],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809515,0.000083190505,0.00077426026,0.000051343777,0.00077405263,0.00022201595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814045,0.00018207228,0.00092100457,0.000112009635,0.00043372213,0.00021073167],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004799319,0.000077144,0.00009921997,0.00049474766,0.0025323448,0.0020330483,0.0004793072,0.00003986432,0.000040734347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013250818,0.00004807266,0.000025279516,0.0012513947,0.0013450789,0.35582423,0.00011810787,0.00023132395,0.00002354439],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017662642,0.0000040784903,0.0067982865,0.000012838816,0.0000031263082,1.3072108e-7,0.34192917,0.000012370238,0.000022757653,0.6138415,0.000683915,0.03667417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005498145,0.00023050938,0.06876468,0.00022039,0.000010330925,0.000050744973,0.20453507,0.0033040028,0.00058899046,0.003734855,0.7177893,0.00022133833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029830142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016226645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7171053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027503871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007489501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99900293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794465974","doi":"10.1177/0961000618763979","title":"Librarians’ perceptions of educational values of comic books: A comparative study between Hong Kong, Taiwan, Japan, Australia and New Zealand","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Comics and Graphic Narratives","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Hong Kong Polytechnic University; University of Hong Kong; University of Bristol; McGill University; Washington University in St. Louis","keywords":"Comics; Popularity; School library; Reading (process); Sociology; Value (mathematics); Recreation; Library science; Media studies; Pedagogy; Psychology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.09644010727697613,"score_gpt":0.32206365271065673,"score_spread":0.2256235454336806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794465974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99412066,0.000030403251,0.000046041165,0.0013476016,0.00019162567,0.00013371879,0.00003153541,0.0000027783822,0.0040956526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986153,0.000013312879,0.000307103,0.00004964728,0.00029266963,7.079541e-7,0.0000028246275,0.0000020849673,0.00071630185],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998777,0.00004624512,0.0006761705,0.000074749085,0.00031617866,0.000109706045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985933,0.00013930556,0.00066476275,0.00009359347,0.00037204468,0.00013703301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052567874,0.00009589786,0.00026285765,0.0005285113,0.00030752842,0.00042298238,0.00023668943,0.00002393664,0.00037348559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059415943,0.00007229654,0.000041465686,0.00019437853,0.0014154308,0.008996071,0.000054628643,0.000118932396,0.0000024382448],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006611262,0.00007663012,0.406109,0.000021939608,0.000049358074,6.444029e-8,0.40646127,0.0000020724324,0.00016230818,0.18013975,0.0064241756,0.0004873176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008118188,0.0010507152,0.9056546,0.00009103036,0.000042782525,0.0000061095784,0.07364471,0.000050076942,0.00021792694,0.013878922,0.004435804,0.00011550932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006944371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003828932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49954557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007815212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035303185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6521934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799560757","doi":"10.1177/0961000618769972","title":"Connecting people with city cultural heritage through proximity-based digital storytelling","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Digital Storytelling and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Storytelling; Cultural heritage; Downtown; Digital storytelling; Perception; Test (biology); Sociology; Psychology; History; Multimedia; Computer science; Art; Narrative","score_opus":0.06625830221363008,"score_gpt":0.34666161581160687,"score_spread":0.28040331359797677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799560757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9395542,0.00002303384,0.025228495,0.0008920071,0.00066435896,0.00013996835,0.0000045765687,0.000031071762,0.033462286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99494296,0.0000068316363,0.0039273477,0.000777976,0.00029181252,0.000001935381,0.000003537923,0.0000040353093,0.000043565273],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987155,0.000034775454,0.0005020267,0.0000803871,0.00041842926,0.000248861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99818355,0.00019499312,0.00066066656,0.000097289376,0.0007144371,0.00014906708],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009634723,0.000087507324,0.00013974603,0.00015351585,0.0011136612,0.00048488934,0.00021062963,0.000052743468,0.00004718808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053892075,0.000058348993,0.000025197589,0.00059520593,0.0002118499,0.039319348,0.000029751332,0.00029925737,0.000027827822],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001237045,0.0003066004,0.43037397,0.00068614277,0.000057959944,0.0000034815112,0.4860533,0.00066222495,0.00034183465,0.035156224,0.0033692447,0.041751985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0052017267,0.0043603065,0.1549116,0.0025786438,0.000079338744,0.0002134012,0.2985093,0.013051967,0.0037325388,0.004636317,0.5114764,0.0012484287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011000075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000049864566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5081072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007234361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082638004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9741172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2826165912","doi":"10.1177/0961000618785408","title":"Correction and retraction practices in library and information science journals","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Library science; Quality (philosophy); Web of science; Information science; Minor (academic); Computer science; MEDLINE; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03919387877003243,"score_gpt":0.3343058517107731,"score_spread":0.29511197294074065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2826165912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80517894,0.0002040013,0.0011104094,0.014888463,0.002572808,0.00017183165,0.0000025891475,0.00002427517,0.17584667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918943,0.005207546,0.0010870829,0.0014518505,0.0003113482,6.1722847e-7,5.2187846e-7,0.0000014620174,0.00004526802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805874,0.000115081304,0.0006067725,0.00008317059,0.00090264395,0.00023358362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975951,0.00032385276,0.0013836853,0.000059786933,0.000390499,0.0002471066],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008421669,0.00007548315,0.00012215709,0.0014279231,0.0011488053,0.0023217825,0.00030335787,0.00020998753,0.00005189248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00594334,0.00006276134,0.000013687216,0.0020479579,0.0019621646,0.35438251,0.00007608136,0.0008665818,0.0000054419115],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042750523,0.000037618152,0.17570156,0.000064098866,0.000009776818,0.000002627031,0.18631038,0.000012335888,0.0014230402,0.3660012,0.0043331473,0.2656767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006312456,0.00034632112,0.6288362,0.0003298884,0.000014689149,0.0003809178,0.053050164,0.0046655145,0.0023762987,0.0050286246,0.30409724,0.00024289024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006300099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000547354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45313466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044149943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011583335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987139},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2890504030","doi":"10.1177/0961000618792387","title":"Servant leadership theory in practice: North America’s leading public libraries","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Servant leadership; Public relations; Sociology; Library management; Creativity; Management; Political science; Transactional leadership; Library science","score_opus":0.06913085842209855,"score_gpt":0.3159483718141601,"score_spread":0.24681751339206154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890504030","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3054593,0.0004050563,0.008861284,0.12536702,0.0024557745,0.00048427915,0.000013496552,0.00011812899,0.5568357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97136784,0.0002660956,0.0045323283,0.023261074,0.00033258015,0.000001626421,0.000002662332,0.0000032314967,0.0002325894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973381,0.00023968538,0.0008178026,0.000100376354,0.0010455012,0.00045849723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976436,0.00045463882,0.0008413249,0.00014522883,0.00056632253,0.0003488846],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046273475,0.000104716084,0.00017444798,0.001158298,0.0008934815,0.003074712,0.00091120077,0.000059968766,0.00016533202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042148777,0.000083180224,0.00004035625,0.0034563066,0.0025138569,0.41710344,0.00009948693,0.00027143108,0.0000888007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007180399,0.000023045519,0.019062696,0.000013218737,0.000005233997,0.000002004702,0.15505852,0.00000853823,0.00001012078,0.76757973,0.0014945098,0.05667059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032203717,0.0002016677,0.029167145,0.00005369043,0.000004864821,0.000024310837,0.13459067,0.00033638763,0.000096990654,0.0039080326,0.8311312,0.00016297106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017170436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000048354927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8296367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057849324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021897187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995968421","doi":"10.1177/0961000619891762","title":"Survey of information literacy instructional practices in academic libraries","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Literacy; Academic library; Work (physics); Library instruction; Higher education; Survey data collection; Psychology; Medical education; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Computer science; Library science; Political science; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.04869139430555343,"score_gpt":0.3440357637839102,"score_spread":0.2953443694783568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995968421","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9572977,0.000098517055,0.00025522718,0.002584689,0.0008800651,0.00019885442,0.000017376164,0.000012555276,0.038655058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99580866,0.00033428648,0.0021071418,0.0016356553,0.000051827912,0.0000010322991,0.000011460665,0.0000014901697,0.00004842745],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699295,0.00016123497,0.0013411437,0.00006634643,0.0011974896,0.00024083212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957044,0.00048046687,0.0027507897,0.00012187292,0.0007644505,0.00017801851],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060396646,0.000089514666,0.00020126851,0.0014978589,0.00021806946,0.0011784016,0.0007756697,0.00010114875,0.00018986517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038046932,0.00007400816,0.000034697023,0.0029699923,0.0006201067,0.51837647,0.00009595626,0.00034089855,0.000036348993],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012784149,0.000014125092,0.52643216,0.000059605027,0.000004320317,2.260125e-7,0.053043783,0.00011085406,0.000027080794,0.37840962,0.00036707954,0.0414033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049792405,0.000096638316,0.8789479,0.00009297691,0.000002000726,0.000015029293,0.00722205,0.0010903792,0.00016112959,0.0018896601,0.1098728,0.00011152443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018612282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020855432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5171981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040742423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024995394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005286981","doi":"10.1177/0961000620904432","title":"Social justice in library science programs: A content analysis approach","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Mindset; Public relations; Economic Justice; Social justice; Sociology; Economic shortage; Information literacy; Content analysis; Political science; Social science; Pedagogy; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.13710943507218867,"score_gpt":0.32527228068014885,"score_spread":0.18816284560796018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005286981","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7474439,0.00007138374,0.003999781,0.051744465,0.00037439162,0.00040297027,0.000005297797,0.00006763546,0.19589013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99362993,0.00007438529,0.003033764,0.0030095181,0.00021755772,0.0000017655212,0.0000023705804,0.0000017719378,0.000028957458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743927,0.00008197301,0.00063025975,0.00015740552,0.0013505087,0.00034058662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872464,0.000054515884,0.0004970325,0.00006936955,0.00020242031,0.0004519928],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025912896,0.0000857945,0.0002017128,0.0010053919,0.00093344046,0.0024923168,0.0009915715,0.00005132793,0.00003072793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006523999,0.00006943123,0.00006991426,0.011377554,0.0020996954,0.116728745,0.00010237465,0.00020530532,0.000004216722],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001186448,0.0001040945,0.14685416,0.00005819995,0.000020873878,0.000006059666,0.15946403,0.000121375575,0.00034968852,0.6745439,0.000605719,0.017753238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017590842,0.0007808485,0.59878874,0.00006451196,0.0002592143,0.000021602762,0.27412415,0.020076862,0.0010216788,0.002734071,0.09964785,0.00072139275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013494319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014935121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67180985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003466417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029676945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006663994","doi":"10.1177/0961000620902247","title":"Reading work as a diversity practice: A differentiated approach to reading promotion in academic libraries in North America","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Reading (process); Promotion (chess); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Work (physics); Public relations; Library science; Political science; Computer science; History; Politics; Engineering; Anthropology; Law","score_opus":0.07398804566953252,"score_gpt":0.3113527459360264,"score_spread":0.2373647002664939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006663994","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9536427,0.000013837071,0.0017391446,0.023101203,0.00012930892,0.00024993918,0.000001899995,0.000021406964,0.021100527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99464643,0.0001104714,0.002374481,0.002772958,0.0000730738,0.0000017436855,0.000003227339,0.0000017445149,0.000015888942],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981357,0.00015110751,0.000520195,0.00013410188,0.0007973427,0.00026156814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890256,0.00013102117,0.00045170376,0.00005638223,0.000096999494,0.00036131075],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001375958,0.000081104256,0.00015496538,0.0005611753,0.0004970252,0.0008697604,0.0005757795,0.00006414385,0.00001391557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026441803,0.00007092874,0.000023156776,0.0051733004,0.00030561877,0.07596916,0.00018633109,0.00035962125,0.000008731],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028468878,0.000068736146,0.49256644,0.000025859716,0.0000037531415,0.0000070995766,0.4547703,0.0003381797,0.00009815757,0.04050654,0.0003882581,0.010942001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077785435,0.00051548873,0.85670584,0.0001854135,0.000012002296,0.000014679184,0.120012924,0.001995779,0.0002119817,0.0014295678,0.01780346,0.00033499257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000066810695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000037671623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3641394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057698984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008122645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9369548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009671763","doi":"10.1177/0961000620907958","title":"Collaboration clusters, interdisciplinarity, scope and subject classification of library and information science research from Africa: An analysis of Web of Science publications from 1996 to 2015","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Subject (documents); Information science; Library science; Computer science; Data science; Political science; World Wide Web; Sociology","score_opus":0.4194052641794983,"score_gpt":0.5149488567052041,"score_spread":0.09554359252570577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009671763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9836614,0.00017400608,0.0050244583,0.006879332,0.000135633,0.00026761327,0.00026052585,0.0000071471204,0.0035898788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99370295,0.00032980434,0.005792798,0.00012697853,0.000024658597,0.0000025056208,0.000013666236,0.0000023881908,0.0000042310626],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885621,0.0002127642,0.0019275986,0.00038175168,0.008573758,0.00034199026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98680776,0.0016881006,0.0017153227,0.0005323392,0.008307526,0.000948946],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.024480235,0.00011757884,0.0004385118,0.06891798,0.0006375102,0.006182586,0.0029952927,0.000078803634,0.000049984083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022499662,0.00008759655,0.000050637576,0.26310706,0.004245909,0.14936264,0.0016303527,0.00026681172,0.0000030864162],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065741956,0.00021625849,0.63211715,0.000071642,0.00007133589,5.051817e-7,0.07598343,0.00077764585,0.12328267,0.08438459,0.0018266583,0.08061071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003449198,0.0004849672,0.857591,0.00003103751,0.000025482424,0.0000012298307,0.017100483,0.11345593,0.008546646,0.0011494022,0.0011743951,0.00009450647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006656951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006734582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22547385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000068321715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037561872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3049588163","doi":"10.1177/0961000620948573","title":"On the evolution of library and information science doctoral dissertation topics in China","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Provincial Universities of Zhejiang; Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"China; Information science; Library science; Documentation science; Sociology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.21682604463760077,"score_gpt":0.44240869001076066,"score_spread":0.2255826453731599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3049588163","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97363466,0.00006137271,0.0027065647,0.013578157,0.00020150107,0.00012934869,0.00000557864,0.0000043382825,0.009678481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99855894,0.00013225774,0.0005347018,0.00073588645,0.000027290735,7.3381597e-7,5.324057e-7,0.0000010798584,0.000008607074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941429,0.0000740171,0.0010122275,0.00012048386,0.004434973,0.00021539396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971583,0.0007971892,0.00081016007,0.00017086828,0.0007644904,0.00029901112],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009736734,0.000075671865,0.0001589739,0.018810244,0.00028739724,0.0035283186,0.001438503,0.000040864215,0.000042789863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020988913,0.000042199215,0.000033225213,0.078432925,0.0007135719,0.11895049,0.0002830769,0.00024525568,0.000006886946],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014863629,0.00002527948,0.17567104,0.000021950229,0.000001992457,6.7458797e-7,0.007509119,0.00034292164,0.00084593135,0.74995285,0.00044452873,0.06503508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003262855,0.0003096793,0.95591444,0.00002341796,0.0000013684424,0.0000071791737,0.0033187352,0.027153395,0.0017971674,0.008826379,0.0022569408,0.00006501446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005970669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.5178644e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7802434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004028895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009314887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99750614},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W3093537575","doi":"10.1177/0961000620966651","title":"Are you mentoring or coaching? Definitions matter","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Mentoring and Academic Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coaching; Psychology; Professional development; Bridge (graph theory); Medical education; Pedagogy; Medicine","score_opus":0.11930690449450174,"score_gpt":0.31641857458214495,"score_spread":0.19711167008764321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093537575","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63902384,0.00020803697,0.0140178185,0.064094506,0.0072619803,0.00022904003,0.00002107071,0.000069140224,0.27507457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98643446,0.00004486321,0.0022121065,0.010681002,0.00025366867,0.000002674341,9.045139e-7,0.0000036067902,0.00036673952],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894524,0.000026973463,0.0004525606,0.000065341905,0.00033465485,0.00017525515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902356,0.000065325774,0.0005291237,0.00005976739,0.00006965337,0.0002525778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008293835,0.00006389723,0.00010662758,0.00018296896,0.00016938095,0.00026764002,0.000262327,0.0000357415,0.00055212795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003023807,0.000044970002,0.000021207106,0.00040988607,0.000077339646,0.0064350725,0.000051992378,0.00021307588,0.00015064467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006094337,0.000100983154,0.44591844,0.0002160367,0.00011287746,0.000050820723,0.18410312,0.00007137694,0.00075202057,0.11035513,0.22583884,0.031870928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011197242,0.00016161775,0.32208404,0.00015452888,0.000019074201,0.00020647609,0.017009106,0.00010518421,0.00048536615,0.00045050101,0.65798765,0.00021671437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":8.6842715e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.9520678e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43214884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019818895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010481888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60454136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130697116","doi":"10.1177/0961000621992806","title":"“I actually got my first job through my ex-colleague”: Employment-related information seeking behavior of Bangladeshi immigrants in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Settlement (finance); Government (linguistics); Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.02304434740337595,"score_gpt":0.2632616190054618,"score_spread":0.24021727160208584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130697116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97831285,0.000052809093,0.00020505482,0.0034576587,0.0006252102,0.0001736893,0.00001584193,0.000008480342,0.017148435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981834,0.00021518065,0.0006316883,0.0008556217,0.000034228367,0.000002169632,0.000007150069,0.0000020595082,0.00006850093],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99711466,0.00008685914,0.0011468967,0.000091635135,0.0012581847,0.00030176403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982926,0.00015186914,0.00088466454,0.0001197307,0.00036222526,0.00018891189],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014690479,0.000105236046,0.00021044341,0.0003370088,0.00047502518,0.0006844933,0.00049580395,0.00007568404,0.00015131592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006239976,0.00009298016,0.00004819944,0.002181577,0.00035780758,0.07493519,0.00006282676,0.00021100069,0.000004584468],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011249697,0.00010823459,0.61954814,0.00010748212,0.000023390421,0.00004193319,0.28255862,0.00046270565,0.0010062152,0.067705095,0.00229688,0.026028795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014016769,0.00017317374,0.81826836,0.00029860652,0.000022570644,0.0000658864,0.14110793,0.0005929004,0.0041871807,0.0010033292,0.03255444,0.00032396743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046791833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.084128715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19872017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019657513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010599068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138645362","doi":"10.1177/0961000621996412","title":"Reading practices of Spanish-speaking readers in the United States and Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Reading (process); Immigration; Diaspora; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Library science; Public relations; Political science; Gender studies; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.05227271976606216,"score_gpt":0.3131673343342439,"score_spread":0.2608946145681817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138645362","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9714648,0.00004194861,0.0000851167,0.018456053,0.0001309787,0.00003990242,0.0000017357842,0.0000018030897,0.009777668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99731505,0.0005149933,0.00051718013,0.0016060924,0.000030900595,1.928569e-7,0.0000018266602,5.6603193e-7,0.000013215727],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987925,0.000117392854,0.00032419217,0.000046238936,0.000600925,0.000118708325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869806,0.0003457636,0.00066176715,0.000051779647,0.00016950899,0.00007309686],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024362619,0.000035447967,0.000070148155,0.0001832634,0.00030209208,0.0006797725,0.00024652496,0.000019547946,0.000010744481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001477685,0.000024284629,0.000008683768,0.0012139486,0.00036957988,0.026635313,0.000022149386,0.000105607956,1.0579819e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004671163,0.000035005145,0.2577368,0.00007179529,0.000008822905,0.000033540327,0.47742015,0.00025061457,0.00063012255,0.25006115,0.0015786131,0.012126658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026875443,0.00008404154,0.19089329,0.00011737753,0.000007963307,0.000076388555,0.70392025,0.0008337645,0.0019335592,0.0022777275,0.09948096,0.00010594881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046370693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024112344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24778344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019865665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002774751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9936951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164682760","doi":"10.1177/09610006211016533","title":"How are academic libraries in Spanish-speaking Latin America responding to new models of scholarly communication and predatory publishing?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Latin Americans; Scholarly communication; Public relations; Literacy; Information literacy; Political science; Sociology; Library science; Pedagogy; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.42365335728596165,"score_gpt":0.45484211218195625,"score_spread":0.031188754895994597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164682760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9221679,0.0025375872,0.04004464,0.028341262,0.00021582963,0.00014783195,0.00001871612,0.000008337211,0.0065178755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97565717,0.00085589883,0.022365188,0.00084469246,0.0000317016,7.401699e-7,0.0000010283526,0.0000031471234,0.00024041612],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931803,0.00024474144,0.001142808,0.00020842742,0.0049363608,0.00028737722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924311,0.0020953189,0.0013707352,0.00041021258,0.0031370039,0.00055564044],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017771345,0.00009352339,0.00029416053,0.043825127,0.0002497448,0.035185177,0.0022430595,0.000112355534,0.000021718344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08210986,0.000071015245,0.000041085965,0.110097446,0.0003294996,0.24522173,0.0011930712,0.00072549755,0.000001538456],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018457016,0.0000417603,0.36826822,0.000041618743,0.000010666587,0.000008051593,0.026244136,0.0009344829,0.003819506,0.10036659,0.0057829013,0.4942975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00115599,0.00023426182,0.794661,0.00039431753,0.0000061352953,0.000070906746,0.036204178,0.018244883,0.005167685,0.059045218,0.08453358,0.00028183914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015746204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000021770925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49401566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005709189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015392929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9670123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200388854","doi":"10.1177/09610006211065170","title":"Library services enriching community engagement for dementia care: The Tales & Travels Program at a Canadian Public Library as a case study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Mental Health and Patient Involvement","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Networks of Centres of Excellence of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alzheimer Society; Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; AGE-WELL","keywords":"Dementia; Library science; Sociology; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.2926839942451338,"score_gpt":0.42025743559317946,"score_spread":0.12757344134804566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200388854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98445505,0.00043558548,0.000049163405,0.0034709845,0.00061599707,0.0017941243,0.00007464338,0.00002973631,0.009074703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98636025,0.00010903684,0.0020911745,0.010907309,0.0001006216,0.00011928368,0.0001500009,0.000008753422,0.00015355767],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99687916,0.000990978,0.0010301437,0.00010247204,0.00049737626,0.0004998742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99749374,0.0005791024,0.00070387946,0.00029118083,0.0002469974,0.00068509934],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027298448,0.00013700522,0.00018817786,0.00038841428,0.006743842,0.00069304474,0.0005510286,0.00006675523,0.00023055529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010057839,0.00009248833,0.00005494398,0.0008036951,0.000112117035,0.016942598,0.00040295033,0.0007006636,0.000014720265],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013135196,0.00032812657,0.4713023,0.0023454947,0.00007950155,0.000086007625,0.4726268,0.0000058683295,0.000012120529,0.006922403,0.0018243282,0.04433567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014873093,0.000810847,0.029875115,0.00032357633,0.000048333346,0.00031927522,0.495797,0.00016272486,0.0000580562,0.0003577935,0.47059688,0.00016308579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020491579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00994875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46877253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000109764354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042904136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225368706","doi":"10.1177/09610006221090953","title":"Starting from ‘scratch’: Building young people’s digital skills through a coding club collaboration with rural public libraries","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Child Development and Digital Technology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Public relations; Club; Digital divide; Literacy; Champion; Digital literacy; Information and Communications Technology; Sociology; Information literacy; Political science; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.01375148116998104,"score_gpt":0.24965103382135212,"score_spread":0.23589955265137108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225368706","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9460395,0.000060413066,0.006575736,0.015960177,0.00046559089,0.00015194053,0.000025864863,0.00006784403,0.030652925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99559474,0.00004374414,0.0032220534,0.0010014044,0.000081046725,0.0000036778301,0.000009118031,0.0000037720072,0.00004044903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801064,0.000047479618,0.00052377686,0.00009393499,0.0010381062,0.00028609624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986796,0.00018261222,0.0006633651,0.00008524794,0.0002585878,0.00013061178],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097635493,0.00009545147,0.00016535992,0.00040766606,0.0018652845,0.0048228954,0.00051118096,0.00004039892,0.000065140346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00085653586,0.00008034107,0.000028061839,0.0024326174,0.00046045153,0.08744211,0.00023184433,0.00023097593,0.0000019422484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008183295,0.000041414238,0.20091338,0.0000066424095,0.000018083289,0.000003319913,0.137007,0.00006158793,0.00009810442,0.650831,0.001817263,0.009120397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019808402,0.00057002314,0.05046517,0.00011941369,0.000022141514,0.000034607943,0.6303071,0.0006509889,0.00091303594,0.25764963,0.056597855,0.0006891952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000041188217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032278487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4933001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012218852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016992504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384931546","doi":"10.1177/09610006231187686","title":"Pedagogical strategy for scholarly communication literacy and avoiding deceptive publishing practices","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Public relations; Scholarly communication; Literacy; Perspective (graphical); Best practice; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Pedagogy; Computer science","score_opus":0.22168858326046045,"score_gpt":0.4330245079237446,"score_spread":0.21133592466328413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384931546","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86237556,0.000519236,0.010641115,0.073092654,0.00045662478,0.00033292023,0.00001736135,0.000061078346,0.05250346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943418,0.0016634838,0.0028995872,0.0007976927,0.00014914543,0.000002171621,0.0000041645867,0.0000016366429,0.00014030517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985273,0.00023402956,0.00040031457,0.00006584199,0.000580503,0.00019204222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964249,0.001727372,0.0009406842,0.000063182895,0.000670907,0.00017291351],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01567985,0.000054280627,0.00009903853,0.00042135958,0.0016237826,0.009475151,0.0004996338,0.00018349693,0.000015260723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020474501,0.000043816788,0.000024865863,0.000905208,0.00041749314,0.21484315,0.000081228085,0.0010054774,0.000003885759],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048852566,0.0000060536718,0.004751234,0.000020723262,0.000005740434,4.288574e-7,0.18756759,0.000014358451,0.00008121909,0.75812393,0.00215024,0.047229607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071575615,0.00020732121,0.042379346,0.00021219019,0.000022737526,0.0000431277,0.3499329,0.0036939925,0.00016494995,0.07965572,0.5227558,0.00021611051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006661643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000050600092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6784682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003385441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006612281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386292502","doi":"10.1177/09610006231190654","title":"A study on copyright issues of different controlled digital lending (CDL) modes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Digital Rights Management and Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public domain; Computer science; Service (business); Institution; Business; Political science; Law; Marketing","score_opus":0.0348284962525328,"score_gpt":0.27608958829236085,"score_spread":0.24126109203982804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386292502","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9622532,0.0000119396955,0.005642867,0.0010534452,0.00030240323,0.00023550463,0.0000027308124,0.000044480625,0.03045341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996168,0.000022137616,0.00011330752,0.000077019904,0.000023090772,0.0000015299827,5.8998467e-7,0.0000014394215,0.00014406376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982808,0.000023602628,0.00058075384,0.000090981914,0.0008610737,0.00016276099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989876,0.00014640068,0.00045528825,0.00016795231,0.00013998334,0.00010277268],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008647549,0.00009495761,0.00025221915,0.000883783,0.00013788951,0.0019714897,0.0008324778,0.000017332952,0.0000029367807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017984002,0.0000558463,0.000060762453,0.000986854,0.00012225097,0.037903503,0.00021217114,0.00008463037,0.000011517475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002196562,0.00029420026,0.008565587,0.000032344513,0.000053988046,0.000015929912,0.017740255,0.00014413391,0.000111433015,0.9505777,0.0013128981,0.0209319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.024738966,0.010137832,0.5032405,0.0006695061,0.00008368799,0.00007288998,0.023329433,0.21882689,0.010540552,0.18355095,0.023460751,0.0013480067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":5.401487e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.8259974e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7670267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013561171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000067447174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99906456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388575165","doi":"10.1177/09610006231208026","title":"Facing Threats to Libraries and Cultural Heritage in the Russia-Ukraine War: A Case Study and Comparative Review of the Library and Information Community’s’ Responses to the Conflict","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Archaeological Research and Protection","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Smithsonian Institution","keywords":"Library science; Documentation; Political science; International community; Sociology; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.15353952814580255,"score_gpt":0.3417465128123217,"score_spread":0.18820698466651917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388575165","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9834235,0.0014091531,0.000033772074,0.013438964,0.00003067543,0.00060319516,0.000024075105,0.000006034075,0.0010306884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992842,0.004078,0.0001864464,0.002867367,0.000011081161,0.0000031249958,0.0000026767045,4.3166625e-7,0.000008836428],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851483,0.00055397884,0.00038328953,0.000046862897,0.00036569053,0.00013533415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865913,0.0008868486,0.00017654095,0.00011033893,0.000048944417,0.00011821748],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030029882,0.0000735241,0.00014364549,0.0002260055,0.00074214925,0.00044224763,0.00031544061,0.000020163558,0.000013309194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00080668245,0.000030073234,0.000014476051,0.0013064041,0.00044349988,0.018555157,0.0001710031,0.00030329672,0.0000017967617],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00079369347,0.000016219155,0.25763947,0.00062860356,0.000019977839,0.000027098005,0.5651572,0.00015801999,0.000025477597,0.0035252483,0.0009463252,0.17106268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023800107,0.0007773011,0.88718253,0.00031741327,0.0000050195654,0.00050160615,0.10123236,0.00073898066,0.000036040292,0.000364452,0.008546354,0.000059920738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000121652396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000039755978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6295431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000014354936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009254276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403541284","doi":"10.1177/09610006241285514","title":"Everyday life information seeking: A systematic review with bibliometric analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Information Retrieval and Search Behavior","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province","keywords":"Information seeking; Everyday life; Sociology; Systematic review; Psychology; Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; Epistemology; Social science; Political science; Information retrieval; Library science; Computer science; MEDLINE; Citation; Philosophy","score_opus":0.048565434520747644,"score_gpt":0.32407140836892184,"score_spread":0.2755059738481742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403541284","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000018030591,0.9076445,0.089568555,0.00028449405,0.00032727615,0.00090675737,0.000020057723,0.000057633046,0.0011888837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000086346336,0.99652225,0.0021180492,0.0011567973,0.000032411896,0.00002785945,0.00001900058,0.0000055071646,0.000031803367],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99306005,0.00017619082,0.003406805,0.00016731478,0.0028063,0.0003833472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932953,0.0002778702,0.0038005875,0.00061181746,0.0014769073,0.0005374826],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006468339,0.0003908354,0.0021135896,0.11477573,0.00026931392,0.0060372953,0.0024259975,0.00015392137,0.000016391115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017055337,0.00021228797,0.000544974,0.26307508,0.00018465763,0.0966526,0.00038376884,0.0006988521,0.00018290075],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045357965,0.000014417756,0.000007820868,0.8167999,0.00047879075,0.000007573121,0.0010927018,0.000007241611,1.7467881e-8,0.0135279875,0.001048091,0.16701092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032909212,0.00044183424,0.0001392464,0.35525236,0.012456032,0.0012644905,0.00021163869,0.0053026523,8.0771395e-7,0.00005748813,0.6236964,0.0008480089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000018277518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.677641e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6226483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001490254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035292988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949945},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4410318301","doi":"10.1177/09610006251332613","title":"Virtual and augmented reality in the libraries: Situation analysis, hotspots and new directions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Augmented Reality Applications","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Augmented reality; Computer science; Virtual reality; Data science; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.025886114289215518,"score_gpt":0.28065159176068244,"score_spread":0.25476547747146694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410318301","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05700566,0.00020502617,0.91036814,0.027964603,0.00010029083,0.00016712461,0.0000032642038,0.000020118709,0.0041657872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944979,0.0003949481,0.003537018,0.001510327,0.000016445258,0.0000033353335,0.0000019561096,7.522427e-7,0.00003732334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988498,0.00008102534,0.0004869106,0.00011495583,0.00035038014,0.00011693002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902284,0.0002607347,0.00029986215,0.00021668023,0.000099706784,0.00010019691],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016564766,0.00007161248,0.00013286261,0.001036227,0.00033249342,0.0013267878,0.00052147947,0.000038456044,0.000002105437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026023903,0.000050345538,0.000025431267,0.004424186,0.0002473781,0.018820778,0.00014923527,0.00016194384,4.758821e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016431346,0.00003118923,0.008279953,0.000011563029,0.00003880263,5.008605e-7,0.011286637,0.00034780882,0.00008805942,0.89739096,0.0010643123,0.0814438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049673015,0.00006776408,0.9131537,0.00003472387,0.000054972712,0.000030090323,0.0023454805,0.05630448,0.00015148128,0.018626146,0.008642541,0.00009190423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046098383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012770509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93749225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024597852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044036112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412187308","doi":"10.1177/09610006251353385","title":"Inequity, precarity, and disparity: Exploring systemic and institutional barriers in open access publishing","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Lakehead University; Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Institute for Humane Studies, George Mason University","keywords":"Precarity; Publishing; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.640031349098399,"score_gpt":0.557906649263912,"score_spread":0.082124699834487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412187308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97226965,0.0005736956,0.0055685295,0.006025972,0.0006421913,0.00020140415,0.00000893676,0.000004180291,0.014705451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99794245,0.0009085688,0.00058642525,0.00050487847,0.000023425442,0.0000042816464,4.465256e-7,0.000001066908,0.000028472467],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950182,0.00011442089,0.0010577339,0.00022933062,0.0032983827,0.0002819546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961551,0.0012831178,0.0004898755,0.00019734706,0.0014039862,0.00047056424],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.035215177,0.00008745375,0.00026173415,0.036978547,0.00054333714,0.074255705,0.003794155,0.00006443935,0.000018452407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0491188,0.000060813436,0.00002207568,0.06500434,0.00053822703,0.23296995,0.005208442,0.000375954,9.698765e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003460644,0.000009603587,0.79413074,0.000033515178,0.0000036783401,0.0000025451554,0.0007613679,0.00007142663,0.000049784943,0.08003098,0.0005927841,0.12427898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008481869,0.00005151608,0.95932287,0.000184355,0.000003217432,0.00008264187,0.0021557063,0.008822387,0.00015010616,0.021461515,0.006818216,0.00009930713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000088838955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009804515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16519211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000093006216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017356757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}