{"meta":{"query_hash":"8bf10b5b369b","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication"},"cohort_total":41,"direct_labels_cover":3,"predictions_cover":41,"exported":41,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/8bf10b5b369b","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Librarianship+and+Scholarly+Communication"},"results":[{"id":"W2040552582","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.1102","title":"Library-Press Collaborations: A Study Taken on Behalf of the University of Arizona","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Alberta; Kent State University; University of North Texas; Oregon State University; University of Arizona; Johns Hopkins University; Association of Research Libraries; Syracuse University; Northwestern University; Utah State University; Purdue University","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Library science; Publishing; General partnership; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Management; Law","score_opus":0.027049110446849312,"score_gpt":0.19430493733353327,"score_spread":0.16725582688668394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040552582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886747,0.0010206797,0.00011598528,0.0017276863,0.000037609258,0.000084069994,0.00006016382,0.000013299052,0.008265871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923792,0.0014842883,0.00021026382,0.0010954719,0.00007814301,0.00014064011,0.00006269837,0.000015867634,0.004533444],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894015,0.005388234,0.0004474135,0.0007776872,0.0022359702,0.00174924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96500057,0.01879764,0.0042079417,0.00079640024,0.0049829734,0.0062145744],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010332721,0.00045048216,0.0010243327,0.0048834914,0.024496848,0.012141089,0.0027559223,0.0027427906,0.0061431583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022079216,0.0011278931,0.000330962,0.008706621,0.0055145957,0.005418056,0.006838037,0.0039038328,0.0009877881],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059122005,0.00032380264,0.01655337,0.00017463429,0.000014590246,0.0021511903,0.97114044,0.000021387059,0.00032067669,0.00061911636,0.0015713556,0.0070503275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050266754,0.00007217537,0.025407428,0.00006468376,0.000009026323,0.00017199412,0.9671969,0.000020833044,0.00006746714,0.000039323073,0.006936657,0.000008512196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10204969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16912144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9878589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0112995375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016015338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20291144},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2100283551","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.1105","title":"Point & Counterpoint The Purpose of Institutional Repositories: Green OA or Beyond?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Stewardship (theology); Counterpoint; Thriving; Institution; Library science; Political science; Publishing; Institutional repository; Publication; Scholarly communication; Public relations; World Wide Web; Sociology; Computer science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.42596659035908846,"score_gpt":0.4744248978785353,"score_spread":0.04845830751944685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100283551","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01028831,0.0114934435,0.03190304,0.7468728,0.01017053,0.0001581084,0.0002708898,0.0010667378,0.18777612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4428025,0.016586764,0.057170894,0.26875952,0.00816884,0.0005678981,0.0005064107,0.002217558,0.20321965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9831699,0.0072246892,0.0009010559,0.0016522668,0.005619925,0.001432203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.943942,0.021935537,0.0045209676,0.008678941,0.016680317,0.0042422004],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01690582,0.00081896776,0.0010375016,0.0050913864,0.008025307,0.03483585,0.0037835953,0.012526781,0.027832534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.071087964,0.00048648345,0.0010593251,0.007268326,0.027164835,0.05061106,0.018476373,0.011501496,0.010498415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063962914,0.00003296044,0.0016521317,0.00034974577,0.000030466943,0.00042112186,0.008707937,0.00015800445,0.00027450264,0.6575548,0.23855624,0.09219815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002839154,0.000039722585,0.0010305275,0.00084830786,0.000025583926,0.00038342507,0.016472863,0.0003812839,0.0009854573,0.2413742,0.73834395,0.00008630105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005256771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006581913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064276005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010743491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09310913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123609639","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.1116","title":"On the Mark? Responses to a Sting","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership","field":"Nursing","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Sting; Computer science; History; Philosophy; Epistemology; Engineering","score_opus":0.06964416861627491,"score_gpt":0.31367789583045474,"score_spread":0.24403372721417982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123609639","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030639085,0.002170141,0.00074145105,0.9197019,0.063201964,0.00006290318,0.00010178306,0.00023314221,0.010722803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028346945,0.0023207334,0.0012372695,0.91057354,0.012707272,0.000102821374,0.00007861395,0.00035288112,0.044279914],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98344237,0.008964537,0.001186058,0.0010758209,0.003337943,0.0019932925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95505357,0.017515222,0.003103964,0.0020149462,0.014811319,0.0075009237],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013880778,0.0015457349,0.0008127394,0.0010809427,0.012818081,0.0065214485,0.0025435826,0.022916507,0.036609765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11507552,0.0006322285,0.0015706223,0.0010219465,0.0059406105,0.008758348,0.008449034,0.028415952,0.011645078],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037660728,0.00002718697,0.00053322554,0.0001291365,0.000011243227,0.0012722485,0.010650826,0.000025280695,0.00030653176,0.003196258,0.9721797,0.011630806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009683274,0.000056325913,0.00057133666,0.00051696633,0.000009770144,0.0016244628,0.04059045,0.000084947045,0.00022446166,0.0024251016,0.9538203,0.00006613285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051266616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006556921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99347854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048192753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066990834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12247187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132438686","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.1121","title":"Scholarly Communication at Canadian Research Libraries: Conversations with Librarians","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Wikis in Education and Collaboration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Guelph","funders":"Canadian Association of Research Libraries; Association of Research Libraries","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Scope (computer science); Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Library science; Publishing; Computer science","score_opus":0.07813666282704167,"score_gpt":0.3365969029888442,"score_spread":0.2584602401618025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132438686","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6534315,0.020765562,0.003411749,0.0890859,0.0008483141,0.00047561357,0.0005084594,0.00042211276,0.2310509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9666385,0.0051181247,0.0018467838,0.00786358,0.00016953872,0.00015225814,0.000095299605,0.00008554554,0.01803032],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96289134,0.020247592,0.0012780053,0.0016177625,0.008527229,0.005438097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9454215,0.02597531,0.0032192825,0.0013835548,0.015417249,0.008583112],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022729702,0.0006133564,0.0009059315,0.007064946,0.073406845,0.020399472,0.0032945215,0.004103827,0.010037802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04196204,0.0006478562,0.0004494039,0.016201489,0.019950608,0.006078455,0.010065251,0.003251119,0.0014155101],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080567275,0.000049598297,0.0072320737,0.00043795127,0.000010492347,0.00078136346,0.9257969,0.00007225552,0.0005696251,0.00594914,0.016512748,0.042507287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073807055,0.000033196535,0.0060815155,0.0003654856,0.000018076687,0.00024074361,0.8299829,0.00008034041,0.00046050956,0.00064726686,0.1620131,0.0000694823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89031076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9133759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97960055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12633684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18755065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91664225},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2140834332","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.1028","title":"Developing Open Access Journals: A Practical Guide","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Health Sciences Research and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Advice (programming); Electronic publishing; World Wide Web; Subject (documents); Computer science; Library science; Field (mathematics); Open access publishing; Subject matter; The Internet; Political science; Curriculum","score_opus":0.7349764763730774,"score_gpt":0.660533413607095,"score_spread":0.07444306276598234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140834332","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00526871,0.021793695,0.32652736,0.121788286,0.011012953,0.014225796,0.0044718673,0.038438745,0.45647255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006709126,0.019638149,0.64415205,0.01922298,0.00292705,0.00504012,0.0032521696,0.0032351958,0.29582316],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902125,0.0025435898,0.0011541276,0.0005098508,0.005183176,0.00039684642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9790172,0.0069336956,0.0013160834,0.0011342568,0.0066149794,0.004983691],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008572649,0.0017877963,0.0011922158,0.0057187555,0.0029048051,0.009153681,0.003673378,0.0055269683,0.062142655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021974823,0.0017860221,0.0008138589,0.003969931,0.002231198,0.0108694425,0.0073859035,0.006073923,0.1188056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028469394,0.00030631412,0.00024618077,0.00065121707,0.0000056879353,0.00064386346,0.001999114,0.00033495948,0.0015861163,0.0073828716,0.70830905,0.2785061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016503154,0.000054048734,0.00028996237,0.0004370754,0.0000018603872,0.0011345233,0.00069302035,0.0001352947,0.00015617447,0.004351898,0.9927037,0.000026004838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012993847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037968338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9963266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001603148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0078020087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20788789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565430703","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2137","title":"Engaging Faculty and Reducing Costs by Leveraging Collections: A Pilot Project to Reduce Course Pack Use","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Leverage (statistics); Business; Course (navigation); Service (business); Privilege (computing); Computer science; Engineering management; World Wide Web; Marketing; Engineering; Computer security","score_opus":0.08800380650589312,"score_gpt":0.2876807528450094,"score_spread":0.19967694633911626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2565430703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95035946,0.00021261768,0.00846691,0.0029389786,0.00008078142,0.013100571,0.0005778755,0.0010042969,0.023258572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88774276,0.0006991419,0.077793784,0.0010692315,0.00009896667,0.009465588,0.0008231441,0.00027117555,0.022036321],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99403065,0.0028036262,0.00024168572,0.00039379057,0.0012500456,0.0012801717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98249096,0.00600071,0.0012704128,0.0023121675,0.0025640645,0.005361701],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010666164,0.0008131903,0.00043224913,0.001983671,0.0061446317,0.0045629204,0.0037349572,0.0015299574,0.011854495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017158976,0.0006652618,0.00066741527,0.002073117,0.0027165792,0.002830661,0.005815525,0.0016780228,0.0017800354],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020035387,0.06644361,0.02718485,0.0015852469,0.000109281216,0.0014119542,0.05560339,0.0030286335,0.011619869,0.005493349,0.026055621,0.79946065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0071139205,0.07918041,0.2504016,0.00121547,0.0010105576,0.0017695747,0.20918213,0.013799245,0.07516139,0.0081890095,0.35242817,0.0005485715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018486895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036891256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9954371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047289412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023636514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056408703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604895157","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2104","title":"Open Access Policies and Academic Freedom: Understanding and Addressing Conflicts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Academic freedom; Context (archaeology); Political science; Public relations; Commercialization; Vagueness; Public administration; Freedom of information; Higher education; Law","score_opus":0.9468948604005198,"score_gpt":0.6709462950792823,"score_spread":0.27594856532123757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604895157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15466614,0.01891942,0.10078379,0.26873186,0.00077542634,0.0002742198,0.00014068307,0.000090631154,0.45561785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979654,0.0031796058,0.008153084,0.004500092,0.0002800444,0.00016037871,0.00003760039,0.00003931921,0.003995899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8963611,0.075101435,0.0042379857,0.004427065,0.013225317,0.0066471775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7186615,0.22605614,0.024004377,0.011990136,0.0113445865,0.007943288],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08730991,0.00065247196,0.0012363525,0.008426533,0.015931878,0.044118363,0.0037486549,0.01028782,0.0072767213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16640548,0.00094975857,0.0009771995,0.010307649,0.087193474,0.052615628,0.027828384,0.011352233,0.00058361853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011929608,0.000023358041,0.0017420438,0.000091984424,0.000011092112,0.00010166379,0.019461637,0.00032906557,0.00004631615,0.9677728,0.0009046982,0.009503612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012682184,0.00001251587,0.0009285186,0.0004632213,0.000010210558,0.00009412847,0.03368187,0.0007927277,0.0001378315,0.9263107,0.03752806,0.000027502805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008899692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006053289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99625134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023111619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03163508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4617445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611121576","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2196","title":"From the Ground Up: A Group Editorial on the Most Pressing Issues in Scholarly Communication","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Pressing; Common ground; Scholarly communication; Group (periodic table); Political science; Engineering physics; Telecommunications; Media studies; Library science; Sociology; Engineering; Computer science; Physics; Mechanical engineering; Law; Publishing; Communication; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.046078614963587644,"score_gpt":0.2773644810567435,"score_spread":0.23128586609315585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611121576","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009442175,0.002194864,0.00012727763,0.06824188,0.92861056,0.000032213098,0.000034600303,0.000043069394,0.0006211067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008681795,0.0021831319,0.00027679437,0.030366877,0.96318704,0.00004368727,0.00003653391,0.000074506795,0.0029631245],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97392374,0.005362156,0.004087158,0.0021307275,0.012716964,0.0017791659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8695936,0.04029843,0.007460021,0.002526957,0.06030608,0.019814802],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024439897,0.003609597,0.004136782,0.0074977074,0.009525356,0.018016357,0.0045460337,0.020736814,0.01051847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06863401,0.001300857,0.003604798,0.0034909358,0.006232227,0.007221042,0.0033029637,0.025348518,0.0066548265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006850244,0.000020231677,0.000071516064,0.00027370968,0.000018963103,0.00013132145,0.000059045473,0.000015853197,0.00015692603,0.00021010781,0.9952468,0.0037269609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014956815,0.000100056546,0.00087638013,0.0013391569,0.00012836738,0.00038707588,0.0006719885,0.0002544337,0.00035164476,0.0013703363,0.9943,0.000070912836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020107047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066937353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98198366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044668447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010478768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12925208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753955980","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2182","title":"Measuring Cost per Use of Library-Funded Open Access Article Processing Charges: Examination and Implications of One Method","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Payment; Publishing; Actuarial science; Data science; World Wide Web; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.8868527694239678,"score_gpt":0.6048805113465975,"score_spread":0.28197225807737036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753955980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42593607,0.02446954,0.40544617,0.01590537,0.0016815229,0.004262353,0.008226107,0.0011197064,0.112953186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8027827,0.0040322696,0.1827289,0.00095275027,0.00030265073,0.0029802183,0.0015159852,0.00038818826,0.004316312],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.8206685,0.090653926,0.009914986,0.008453378,0.06867607,0.0016330497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.42719704,0.4435196,0.056568276,0.027250994,0.04378864,0.0016754693],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07789196,0.0017726177,0.0018416106,0.0140480455,0.0015259498,0.009733622,0.003850327,0.0019420933,0.0050978637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32057333,0.0010441248,0.004218209,0.026310692,0.0037993253,0.011493349,0.004823583,0.0027373116,0.0010329506],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012940473,0.0009037931,0.3771197,0.0039329524,0.0030642939,0.0002179947,0.00307683,0.014791041,0.00066910643,0.086333886,0.011019753,0.4975767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031345373,0.0055167754,0.66349715,0.007148111,0.0025922996,0.002804977,0.0073527438,0.12151316,0.008113098,0.10549021,0.07438699,0.0012709297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008779436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077447705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99614966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018536048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00790301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.411937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783217427","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2209","title":"What’s in a Name? Exploring identity in the field of library journal publishing","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Library Science and Information Systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University; University of Ottawa; York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Service (business); Terminology; Scholarly communication; Public relations; Ambiguity; Directory; Library science; Electronic publishing; Discoverability; Identity (music); World Wide Web; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Business; The Internet; Law; Marketing","score_opus":0.08522159717476123,"score_gpt":0.29678966148625496,"score_spread":0.21156806431149372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783217427","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9539461,0.0012399567,0.0045187394,0.00574264,0.00015023915,0.00004064525,0.00003914269,0.000027537068,0.034294996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971572,0.00040488422,0.0009358463,0.00039761217,0.000047463775,0.00003103458,0.000017289545,0.000015100027,0.0009936593],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96892315,0.023713544,0.0015950656,0.0013574049,0.0029195822,0.0014911611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9226506,0.051921204,0.010700166,0.0035300213,0.0068187574,0.004379295],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02995812,0.0002058523,0.0005557516,0.0047820006,0.0129837375,0.017016629,0.0016053788,0.0016587157,0.00255033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07007459,0.00032072823,0.00029558715,0.0061636795,0.01753631,0.015627079,0.008906058,0.002004327,0.0004398863],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047654063,0.000030938372,0.023118068,0.00010607733,0.0000054869133,0.00017660875,0.9441781,0.000027766482,0.00036478677,0.012752294,0.00046475636,0.018727487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003282665,0.000025751182,0.008284465,0.00012714462,0.0000043976625,0.00019172339,0.9726936,0.00009065393,0.00021794293,0.004682058,0.01366106,0.000017936685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006737662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006011121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98298335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005053094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006894648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15843552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790464658","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2216","title":"Effective Practices and Strategies for Open Access Outreach: A Qualitative Study","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Outreach; Jargon; Public relations; Influencer marketing; Qualitative research; Relevance (law); Political science; Medical education; Psychology; Medicine; Business; Sociology; Marketing","score_opus":0.854673664994753,"score_gpt":0.7095175612684768,"score_spread":0.1451561037262762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790464658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96843565,0.00085905846,0.008688151,0.0063658385,0.000107254935,0.0021901561,0.00018344371,0.000053458374,0.013116978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856311,0.0011524726,0.005715075,0.0014114863,0.000026040614,0.001902485,0.000058916146,0.000034868433,0.0040674577],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9664993,0.027082304,0.0009492458,0.0010515886,0.0018213488,0.00259626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94043124,0.0479695,0.0028696056,0.0013469544,0.0036502746,0.003732482],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037626605,0.00059669436,0.00090632174,0.0026172954,0.014555742,0.007094564,0.0028074286,0.0027771364,0.0039025333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041860815,0.00085543306,0.00050732284,0.0031472852,0.013544331,0.0068692444,0.00874371,0.0028279675,0.0005428761],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015119735,0.00008623617,0.0012509475,0.00018109896,0.0000016531791,0.00037425096,0.99111956,0.000032739237,0.000283336,0.0016946758,0.0002953416,0.0046650902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006107678,0.000048380785,0.00043043346,0.00021553501,0.000002158847,0.00009062302,0.99245113,0.000067162,0.00014733126,0.00043635102,0.006097691,0.000007192678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008695196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011227175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99719256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009760173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013316011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19899088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800148785","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2187","title":"Dissertation-to-Book Publication Patterns Among a Sample of R1 Institutions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; University of Toronto; University of Oklahoma; University of Kansas; University of Minnesota; University of Notre Dame; University of Washington; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Subject (documents); Library science; Openness to experience; The arts; Sample (material); Subject matter; Discipline; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Computer science; Psychology; Law; Pedagogy; Curriculum","score_opus":0.5213068775118257,"score_gpt":0.5402604555768521,"score_spread":0.0189535780650264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800148785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899905,0.0017676438,0.00026372084,0.00060253544,0.000015479984,0.00006384766,0.0027186854,0.00006193741,0.004515815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929993,0.0015737006,0.0007472693,0.00014738338,0.00004222545,0.00009349881,0.0019209088,0.00005100818,0.0024246601],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99478674,0.0010626307,0.0009150984,0.0009726561,0.0018072345,0.0004555907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94231397,0.013642911,0.027941206,0.0028168913,0.009589988,0.0036951758],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005609318,0.0002377214,0.00044569123,0.011174184,0.0011903917,0.0034099177,0.0013447598,0.0004444386,0.0076844073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03168133,0.00027359748,0.00033157817,0.014985869,0.00068352616,0.0024331582,0.0020440686,0.0004541029,0.0023422819],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000119133416,0.00008004222,0.94458985,0.00026722756,0.000052332816,0.00021638995,0.008982176,0.00012265178,0.0010811638,0.00077597337,0.0038011826,0.039911877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003936848,0.00005585135,0.9856269,0.00010999529,0.000013125368,0.0003498178,0.007838066,0.00015139175,0.0003964278,0.000121510086,0.005315835,0.000017224957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065342053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99439067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016195147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014269189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029665291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802900348","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2256","title":"DMP Assistant [Tool Review]","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Data management plan; Plan (archaeology); Globe; Sample (material); Computer science; Data management; Process (computing); World Wide Web; Best practice; Open source; Database; Political science; Psychology; Operating system; Software","score_opus":0.11276516784107112,"score_gpt":0.3530594450017847,"score_spread":0.2402942771607136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802900348","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065440685,0.3040329,0.103306405,0.0435673,0.010364184,0.065514736,0.17313679,0.025453301,0.26808035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03862171,0.3046321,0.3130615,0.023895726,0.002725115,0.12329481,0.08942127,0.011268327,0.09307948],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95908725,0.019696206,0.00870663,0.0014701248,0.010053409,0.0009863562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79678077,0.10445754,0.013113984,0.009248425,0.07293704,0.0034622638],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048210587,0.001798101,0.0034740139,0.02271511,0.0019235545,0.007267328,0.006297214,0.0019091861,0.0911375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26043567,0.0017631995,0.0039881906,0.020941053,0.0010269328,0.008072928,0.008989319,0.002708695,0.03696852],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026224367,0.0000774607,0.00048917515,0.08792656,0.0002637577,0.000142456,0.0007995955,0.00012777116,0.00021952775,0.0017376272,0.34360477,0.5643492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002663414,0.00011510513,0.0015696583,0.07780464,0.0006574691,0.00033822507,0.000627763,0.00022001128,0.00046617095,0.0016926494,0.9161454,0.00009672418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070563047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01789808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99273264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048330966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02859544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30488533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902667247","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2253","title":"Confused about copyright? Assessing Researchers’ Comprehension of Copyright Transfer Agreements","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Subject (documents); Comprehension; Publication; Probit model; Scopus; Confusion; Psychology; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Library science; Econometrics; Economics; Law; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.2204661753787647,"score_gpt":0.39039053199283497,"score_spread":0.16992435661407027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902667247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926779,0.00042790125,0.0022669903,0.00062246114,0.00002889788,0.00010760483,0.00005740216,0.000026391688,0.0037845506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972607,0.00041150712,0.0014469152,0.00021017026,0.00003697229,0.00013525606,0.000081582795,0.000011948941,0.00040490346],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96726936,0.019001078,0.004151386,0.0014579667,0.007029903,0.0010902253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.62565184,0.269841,0.06754056,0.008707526,0.024396475,0.0038625465],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.051124927,0.00061852153,0.00073229714,0.0025919753,0.0009920275,0.005650907,0.0009872105,0.0018429916,0.003384208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2701478,0.00048598828,0.0011095685,0.0016627634,0.002967893,0.005585283,0.0036501242,0.0019111653,0.00061359466],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044497143,0.0008890416,0.5960948,0.001561002,0.00038967756,0.00027536575,0.31475595,0.0007474068,0.0049302066,0.0017657366,0.0014253705,0.076720476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009289922,0.0016492667,0.70207673,0.0016066886,0.0002527296,0.0010566189,0.26613203,0.004111077,0.005031608,0.007167843,0.010558331,0.00026407445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010587717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008672382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9943491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013558406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020249623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2703777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941622362","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2243","title":"Whose Research is it Anyway? Academic Social Networks Versus Institutional Repositories","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Institutional repository; Institution; Inclusion (mineral); Scholarly communication; Public relations; Political science; Institutional research; Work (physics); Social institution; Internet privacy; Library science; Sociology; World Wide Web; Social science; Computer science; Higher education; Publishing; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.29921534314235004,"score_gpt":0.43063155096471384,"score_spread":0.1314162078223638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941622362","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6680313,0.00847937,0.016172497,0.101581104,0.0007420781,0.00026653925,0.00041632744,0.0002691768,0.20404175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920861,0.00177811,0.0019749047,0.0013813431,0.00032763495,0.000081370046,0.000054058455,0.000042674616,0.0022737656],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.916028,0.062158037,0.0042518503,0.0038557737,0.010863136,0.0028432088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.63005805,0.24229266,0.07533428,0.01703465,0.016847542,0.018432844],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041812014,0.00028760658,0.00065910653,0.009419038,0.005954607,0.022464477,0.0019084447,0.00249757,0.011696818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2332424,0.00040853507,0.00035065197,0.014098945,0.013017825,0.027516067,0.008354313,0.001797237,0.0012462646],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00084005576,0.00039269496,0.33432567,0.0014259587,0.00033226702,0.00091785355,0.12232181,0.0007559748,0.0008740772,0.21187484,0.01737849,0.30856043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016096026,0.0006763148,0.17814031,0.004774251,0.0004330999,0.0023372928,0.40159184,0.0037755803,0.0019487612,0.1950385,0.21082692,0.0002962084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029335455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032270625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97753555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046880706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059336363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22112572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972565218","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2334","title":"JLSC Board Editorial 2019","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Global Health Workforce Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Editorial board; Political science; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.037737809988983594,"score_gpt":0.3745965832406652,"score_spread":0.3368587732516816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972565218","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010242621,0.0012124038,0.00013685555,0.04932167,0.9322333,0.00005646568,0.00010688747,0.0001622004,0.016667938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0023178319,0.0027480791,0.0002673989,0.04501008,0.82974374,0.00007729828,0.00023198964,0.00018663214,0.11941696],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950117,0.0005940007,0.00053925486,0.0005702346,0.0027688954,0.0005159094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97326905,0.0033879478,0.0010661001,0.0009670085,0.016531345,0.004778465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004827969,0.0014482223,0.0013067779,0.0025818544,0.004326803,0.011433894,0.0016924733,0.007820675,0.104904674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02912595,0.00056561636,0.0012293502,0.0014525247,0.0023857777,0.0030817299,0.0019719603,0.008675896,0.07936854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010529573,0.0000075290664,0.000033642234,0.000056519133,0.0000020078094,0.00006119445,0.000011227556,0.0000061249007,0.000032759308,0.00019156387,0.99495655,0.0046302434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011172862,0.0000098079945,0.00013895964,0.0001854433,0.000003988829,0.000078628946,0.000057008314,0.00002805024,0.000070293696,0.00024999882,0.99915993,0.0000066488315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025589825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056656892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.104904674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035055017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005047892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35094112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3026806326","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2329","title":"“You Need to Make it as Easy as Possible for Me”: Creating Scholarly Communication Reports for Liaison Librarians","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Practicum; Publishing; Context (archaeology); Relevance (law); Backup; Library science; Public relations; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.04898524726330595,"score_gpt":0.28185855767095264,"score_spread":0.2328733104076467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3026806326","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5081242,0.003193893,0.12877764,0.08405191,0.0035040204,0.010388651,0.0010699743,0.009672231,0.2512175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5596666,0.0037527925,0.35249338,0.0060933884,0.0013889478,0.0054715322,0.0013938358,0.0013821179,0.06835747],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97205406,0.019546092,0.0013036983,0.00095540594,0.0050090663,0.0011315757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9337385,0.02715738,0.007044894,0.0063576396,0.016249198,0.009452352],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03578201,0.0006596511,0.00025831853,0.002162322,0.0052001416,0.010851386,0.002588958,0.0021292719,0.011041923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07799778,0.00064508,0.00043294087,0.0019370948,0.003249614,0.007446744,0.0067078783,0.0026767205,0.008068519],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001332543,0.0013626567,0.01447501,0.0015693343,0.000029893301,0.0018963828,0.21108975,0.00054133387,0.005944692,0.011428262,0.17819048,0.573339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005710799,0.0010914537,0.011148521,0.0015453098,0.000060276085,0.0020357473,0.29164833,0.0007985037,0.008677724,0.004383316,0.6784001,0.00015363617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011067879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022306396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9891486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001946067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011099353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18923563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043225519","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2335","title":"Showcasing Institutional Research: Curating Library Exhibits to Support Scholarly Communication","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Digital and Traditional Archives Management","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Scholarly communication; Outreach; Promotion (chess); Library science; Digital scholarship; Service (business); Public relations; Academic library; Best practice; Relevance (law); Sociology; Community engagement; Political science; Computer science; Publishing; Business","score_opus":0.26445242356463683,"score_gpt":0.2995002243757766,"score_spread":0.035047800811139784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043225519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21977699,0.0036721968,0.09975543,0.04509444,0.0017601103,0.0019288951,0.0011258574,0.007712307,0.6191738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7513887,0.0033265073,0.112152874,0.0028418198,0.0009187134,0.00086588814,0.00062912575,0.0011027347,0.12677357],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928301,0.0041448968,0.00030974747,0.0003563985,0.0016777462,0.00068107375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865238,0.0048027015,0.0011869876,0.0035790205,0.0016748516,0.0022326403],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072860387,0.00052237266,0.00028607732,0.0015860369,0.007834777,0.013321963,0.002297666,0.0022548113,0.03692168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014046421,0.00042306745,0.0006928695,0.0020302488,0.005600694,0.006611095,0.010938231,0.0017530418,0.008436261],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025445165,0.00054931745,0.009909161,0.002622134,0.000041513063,0.002760423,0.17242627,0.0018297532,0.009600493,0.1271453,0.17168956,0.50117177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000155905,0.00031418365,0.003959901,0.0007181325,0.00002466685,0.0012511113,0.06548362,0.0006289995,0.0054479986,0.0071924655,0.91487974,0.000083626604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026402462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067626694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98667806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024469274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062315073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12351531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046613009","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2325","title":"Open Badges for Promoting Open Practices in the Institutional Repository: A Pilot Project","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Online Learning and Analytics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Canadian Association of Research Libraries; Association of Research Libraries","keywords":"Incentive; Open data; Open source; Process (computing); Business; Public relations; Sample (material); Value (mathematics); Compliance (psychology); Closed-ended question; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Psychology","score_opus":0.2242966629908382,"score_gpt":0.3817352003937551,"score_spread":0.15743853740291688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046613009","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.948248,0.00013017101,0.01879882,0.0023075321,0.00010967855,0.020577725,0.00027434982,0.0008149425,0.008738814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8386812,0.0002554784,0.13500957,0.00093421433,0.000096028154,0.019731576,0.00034379362,0.00020391993,0.004744257],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.94533074,0.04148147,0.002503475,0.0018033031,0.0044297054,0.0044512926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84324604,0.07371237,0.008811609,0.028235411,0.017516084,0.028478434],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08684605,0.0008360334,0.0007146329,0.0026003416,0.0073916106,0.0076455916,0.0037473228,0.0030152104,0.006664088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08221471,0.0012329762,0.0011035327,0.0018257491,0.0072150254,0.0065452494,0.012708574,0.0032224855,0.0015596242],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038118572,0.06938725,0.08067392,0.004417602,0.0001425018,0.004260203,0.26304168,0.003095184,0.025447534,0.014699347,0.013115919,0.5179071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004819712,0.09080252,0.16985653,0.0029904034,0.00042461872,0.0030767038,0.46862313,0.010109931,0.049836677,0.014019396,0.184684,0.00075633114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023090413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004326711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99625266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004248482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02007061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45929134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3083918487","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2371","title":"Using Outreach Weeks to Examine Labor, Assessment and Value in Open Advocacy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Public relations; Scope (computer science); Outreach; Work (physics); Action (physics); Political science; Parallels; Value (mathematics); Resource (disambiguation); Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.10885553035346483,"score_gpt":0.33312132968982017,"score_spread":0.22426579933635532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3083918487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9233221,0.00040653063,0.008376059,0.0024014148,0.00016415316,0.0014417332,0.0005336151,0.00011296131,0.06324143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97774,0.00019721939,0.007725167,0.00038733843,0.000039694518,0.002184569,0.00021390452,0.00008424433,0.011427852],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97488004,0.014434892,0.0015596679,0.0013704726,0.005511106,0.0022436685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87632924,0.08149359,0.016347094,0.0041234754,0.014538876,0.007167743],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03165915,0.00035037496,0.00036724837,0.006048293,0.005361162,0.0074915993,0.0023817376,0.0009996174,0.01017601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10891913,0.000491255,0.00049554894,0.0027941202,0.0051656305,0.009332157,0.011512723,0.0025295012,0.0011077763],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000962228,0.0016222537,0.27176028,0.0009279041,0.00004797397,0.00071103836,0.4140817,0.0007435734,0.0015396602,0.051315203,0.011503472,0.24478461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008104909,0.0012615025,0.24353325,0.001481106,0.000037603862,0.0003102068,0.61745054,0.0028117942,0.0029545142,0.019964347,0.10992506,0.00018894974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057179043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009078369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9925084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009988972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008886747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16743153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134355442","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2399","title":"Problematizing Peer Review: Academic Librarians’ Pedagogical Approaches to Peer Review","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Peer review; Information literacy; Equity (law); Peer feedback; Process (computing); Literacy; Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Pedagogy; Medical education; Computer science; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.4968008575047343,"score_gpt":0.40816675869976987,"score_spread":0.08863409880496442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134355442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6150952,0.007565337,0.16424254,0.03740311,0.0009543169,0.004476675,0.000056616704,0.00083788094,0.16936831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9340164,0.002328918,0.050971564,0.0024820776,0.0002607977,0.0010516285,0.000026432866,0.00008640166,0.008775752],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8089317,0.16607483,0.0046614967,0.0030896089,0.015304815,0.0019374692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69397944,0.23542121,0.023322828,0.013754932,0.027641723,0.0058798064],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05842472,0.00039392937,0.0006556679,0.0024607729,0.0067136055,0.011105129,0.0032748668,0.0017686001,0.0038085408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17632805,0.0004795148,0.00055795163,0.0024943857,0.007004804,0.0066027544,0.007552679,0.0027972404,0.00094234705],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010456572,0.0008906303,0.021916872,0.0022342578,0.00011432282,0.000555405,0.49980596,0.0007253767,0.0022681593,0.030077903,0.007866963,0.43343958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020575404,0.0014250848,0.03250536,0.0034117776,0.0002814178,0.0023803888,0.4951585,0.0055126133,0.0062231286,0.06441574,0.38820833,0.00027180742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017251166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038462635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9415753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045229346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016730579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3089832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153642349","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2401","title":"Faculty Survey on OER: Perceptions, Behaviors, and Implications for Library Practice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Open Education and E-Learning","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Open educational resources; Library science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Perception; Political science; Computer science; Psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.0853870494932108,"score_gpt":0.35118564874286007,"score_spread":0.26579859924964927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153642349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97827804,0.0008176492,0.00087687874,0.0060681137,0.00004659291,0.00032424438,0.0013283545,0.00010187712,0.012158186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926191,0.0013694614,0.001174043,0.0015572408,0.00007303828,0.00030883105,0.0005707042,0.000018277446,0.0023093577],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99309784,0.0033917683,0.0010223424,0.00028264883,0.0015540418,0.0006512661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96473396,0.013975938,0.008991862,0.0008690064,0.008122773,0.0033062939],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007839712,0.00015952738,0.00031237837,0.0024943063,0.001284707,0.0017714713,0.00049105723,0.00051673903,0.005679656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032973666,0.00019471136,0.00040555175,0.0049552266,0.00067752314,0.0018468888,0.0013157724,0.0004357556,0.0014259842],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009721737,0.0005467646,0.8764753,0.0004086327,0.000020606949,0.00020227165,0.0151824765,0.00011309918,0.0005369355,0.00028574673,0.0074509406,0.09867997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018232187,0.0004103904,0.8974987,0.00040028204,0.00002842386,0.00035555405,0.08432671,0.00035460113,0.0007378606,0.0002793918,0.015547566,0.000042206677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056947186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046919053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9995089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015879824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003036703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04146087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161804807","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2432","title":"JLSC Board Editorial 2021","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Communication and COVID-19 Impact","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Globe; Conversation; Equity (law); Political science; Public relations; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Action (physics); Editorial board; Work (physics); Media studies; Sociology; Criminology; Law; Library science; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.045934895211961514,"score_gpt":0.3331333323285728,"score_spread":0.28719843711661125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161804807","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008297641,0.0013759475,0.0001374004,0.045090895,0.93394834,0.00006876422,0.00013254523,0.00019933387,0.018963853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018045995,0.0024998628,0.0002584796,0.040172875,0.8390244,0.000093796145,0.0002237031,0.00020526112,0.11571704],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99383754,0.00078485854,0.00062158244,0.00067896897,0.003465586,0.00061140757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96673286,0.004975246,0.0013481465,0.0014184765,0.020232338,0.0052928953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006520926,0.0016813074,0.0013776099,0.0030726504,0.0045088595,0.0124773905,0.0021761006,0.009800549,0.13296098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03535315,0.0006761447,0.0015882265,0.0016324804,0.0022035849,0.003966605,0.0020808913,0.009231848,0.08928468],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009634815,0.0000073501988,0.000028158222,0.000065321205,0.000001933276,0.0000465219,0.000010104385,0.000006548253,0.000029953353,0.00020716693,0.9946656,0.0049218386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000103182565,0.000010656145,0.00012248532,0.00018349597,0.000004174885,0.000054577595,0.00004712072,0.000027566595,0.00005866584,0.00023924331,0.9992349,0.0000067717006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023716774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049425727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13296098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003971025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00520855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44479877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176676922","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.12914","title":"Academic Librarians, Open Access, and the Ethics of Care","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Ethics of care; Nursing ethics; Information ethics; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Competence (human resources); Applied ethics; Framing (construction); Public relations; Engineering ethics; Nursing; Political science; Medicine; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.22987986170220975,"score_gpt":0.4842959798355384,"score_spread":0.25441611813332865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176676922","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020993296,0.045696832,0.021239685,0.54742205,0.0022005665,0.00010481548,0.000039450086,0.0001127059,0.36219057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80782324,0.02156054,0.010335019,0.108485036,0.004156632,0.00033000554,0.000047253507,0.00016468402,0.04709751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.87972414,0.09571767,0.0037525347,0.0031085068,0.013406349,0.0042908564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8974244,0.069753766,0.006636119,0.006282259,0.009837337,0.010066061],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04593836,0.00039541023,0.0008551299,0.0037059817,0.022806473,0.032134555,0.001994988,0.013869954,0.005625414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06983759,0.0005486696,0.0005976517,0.0049064225,0.09932464,0.022125434,0.022341277,0.009979913,0.0022016587],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023897093,0.000045781253,0.001064641,0.00018424579,0.000011245552,0.00022356187,0.04749287,0.0001255064,0.000058926526,0.9035665,0.01957458,0.027628236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020097457,0.000035468827,0.00050752395,0.00092078716,0.0000097556585,0.00040887806,0.030987728,0.00013781656,0.00014821983,0.5795142,0.38727182,0.000037760517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006526508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005261299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99800503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014566322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028919384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24294817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184584196","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.12915","title":"Review of Mapping Scholarly Communication Infrastructure: A Bibliographic Scan of Digital Scholarly Communication Infrastructure","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Publishing; Information infrastructure; Digital era; Computer science; World Wide Web; Library science; Political science; The Internet; Information system","score_opus":0.04746837697579249,"score_gpt":0.2446011519423304,"score_spread":0.19713277496653792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184584196","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010561779,0.9658481,0.0027229202,0.017184831,0.0024211039,0.000054459513,0.0006413167,0.00012217545,0.009948973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012422823,0.9771295,0.004027502,0.003035991,0.0016193634,0.00007020857,0.00059018674,0.000060009916,0.0010444125],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99024135,0.0034890862,0.0015084256,0.00064695725,0.0038643728,0.00024981896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89621305,0.055806205,0.010067585,0.003072341,0.03378956,0.0010512992],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01141884,0.0009384937,0.0016250444,0.051220253,0.0015293711,0.007050871,0.002474435,0.0016700298,0.005841237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07989118,0.0010858446,0.0008831085,0.08194977,0.0040996606,0.0115332045,0.0024119308,0.0019690627,0.0023850708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035703364,0.000026563781,0.0036133805,0.04616176,0.0002562714,0.00010395788,0.0010187634,0.0005698519,0.0002876599,0.01675596,0.13672149,0.79444855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015089978,0.00009028231,0.015204335,0.080943465,0.00052570406,0.0006702798,0.0034864708,0.000556066,0.0005287239,0.008065329,0.88982546,0.000088712746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022415664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04792338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9929491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041809175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015230239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06038928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283457399","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.13831","title":"How Open Is the U15? A Preliminary Analysis of Open Access Publishing in Canadian Academic Libraries","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Mandate; Library science; Open science; Scholarly communication; Political science; Open data; Public relations; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.7234356462162446,"score_gpt":0.5724775161838102,"score_spread":0.1509581300324344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283457399","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95888084,0.0028818084,0.00037791315,0.0031199725,0.000029530402,0.00013953442,0.003425698,0.000037018486,0.03110773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945773,0.0013957287,0.0006653739,0.00026383708,0.000015610309,0.00005152786,0.000911053,0.000020161113,0.0020993943],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850926,0.0012708259,0.0010752793,0.00089113094,0.0092242,0.0024459197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9385791,0.013572311,0.010665507,0.001580307,0.029550344,0.006052436],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008131517,0.00034259853,0.0006327272,0.019897602,0.012128507,0.013697831,0.0023179883,0.00066795613,0.0036466417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044621315,0.00032673936,0.00055995374,0.06534024,0.005205448,0.003661702,0.0052196137,0.0007560199,0.0003193028],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021900755,0.00006881987,0.714626,0.0010541326,0.00013031921,0.0004230083,0.17683476,0.00023844818,0.00088854186,0.016154783,0.0070751105,0.08228711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056703084,0.000039591683,0.80615914,0.00039881113,0.00008620742,0.000110694105,0.15925594,0.0003232182,0.00045012633,0.0005974253,0.032509744,0.00006348492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97769743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98335415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99768203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08723429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13139851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63293207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4295630651","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.14421","title":"Free and Open-Source Automated Open Access Preprint Harvesting","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Upload; World Wide Web; Computer science; Metadata; Identifier; JavaScript; License; Preprint; Unique identifier; Open source; MIT License; Process (computing); Scholarly communication; Publishing; Software; Political science; Operating system","score_opus":0.24536835431654833,"score_gpt":0.41740496308885655,"score_spread":0.17203660877230822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4295630651","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06440784,0.0007513111,0.49550164,0.0014238742,0.0013477101,0.0035198738,0.009799687,0.39241672,0.030831356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13940692,0.0007991173,0.75440645,0.00090604543,0.00062613114,0.0022438148,0.021560485,0.040229518,0.039821547],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883436,0.002000822,0.0010963972,0.0018968268,0.00622225,0.00044003394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9433156,0.022121064,0.0035270778,0.018413426,0.010528067,0.0020947387],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013722081,0.0011028296,0.0013106769,0.0046662786,0.0019873108,0.0051548355,0.0028105194,0.0012544637,0.018977903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0535299,0.0011623297,0.0016866071,0.0035417292,0.0011996215,0.0045512803,0.005298006,0.0017100313,0.030056022],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016283207,0.0007211843,0.013300007,0.0014077099,0.00021945148,0.0012895721,0.0031900648,0.0024572304,0.10200074,0.0077496553,0.17649223,0.68954384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040101985,0.00074639113,0.034585863,0.000595,0.00020230982,0.0023997074,0.0017553035,0.06355706,0.21742691,0.022428466,0.65503305,0.000868923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010936892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001267213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99718946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009412487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033022843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072570145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306750932","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.14460","title":"Book review: Open access in theory and practice: The theory-practice relationship and openness.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Publishing; Open science; Scholarly communication; Library science; Sociology; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Political science; Social science; Computer science; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.08324412778292907,"score_gpt":0.4223793383865874,"score_spread":0.33913521060365837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306750932","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002685027,0.8386927,0.0016327281,0.047034133,0.041685257,0.00020877515,0.00059410674,0.00021675791,0.06966704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030235748,0.8144532,0.002176869,0.025540724,0.01901598,0.00038248877,0.0010097646,0.00019866179,0.13419876],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968388,0.00054913043,0.00021708723,0.0002308058,0.00205638,0.000107696105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98783374,0.0065041515,0.0007018359,0.00019389024,0.004275356,0.00049105036],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001805224,0.00077875995,0.0019683833,0.0033864537,0.00087145536,0.0047620176,0.0016821584,0.0024618134,0.047840673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018259319,0.000543161,0.00071942015,0.0077866013,0.0013312415,0.004629318,0.0013671395,0.0034165292,0.02640058],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006484197,0.000008521821,0.000030343515,0.0014338403,0.000011373654,0.000020793545,0.00004528066,0.000052266692,0.000044324122,0.0016088799,0.9390653,0.057672698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008172793,0.000015608266,0.00023956856,0.0026834349,0.000014490346,0.00018889866,0.000058355956,0.000048514994,0.00003239105,0.0015033804,0.9951975,0.000009801153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046819025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011912771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99831784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022298554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064390018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16004306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324260078","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.16114","title":"Brief Reviews of Books and Products: Open Update Podcast, Season Two","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Library science; World Wide Web; History","score_opus":0.12756249453027732,"score_gpt":0.303024233840851,"score_spread":0.17546173931057366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324260078","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002154534,0.22185154,0.0023023847,0.08210224,0.5147838,0.001404599,0.007649301,0.0019166752,0.16583489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0090750065,0.17540628,0.003550262,0.06755334,0.16955051,0.0010579502,0.012033793,0.001697214,0.56007564],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99564457,0.00046836384,0.00036768313,0.00018664986,0.0029118897,0.00042081974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9714835,0.004655504,0.0025127965,0.0009393248,0.016008547,0.0044002477],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005454642,0.0009267269,0.0013567758,0.006376866,0.0020399352,0.009024769,0.0018024379,0.0040870486,0.0699093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02199923,0.00077247265,0.0010958356,0.006182865,0.00081004103,0.0049751285,0.0028690337,0.0041580675,0.04669539],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042399664,0.000029522715,0.000068305286,0.00050485024,0.0000029964542,0.000018726074,0.00002637495,0.000017086746,0.00013803363,0.00026554766,0.96804875,0.030837284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008337068,0.000047385834,0.00073986617,0.00034379782,0.000004978485,0.000033117256,0.000053628755,0.000014426414,0.00006173527,0.00013422829,0.99855,0.000008564862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00697909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02141628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99097526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002579186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071745273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23386991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360825336","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.16113","title":"Brief Reviews of Books and Products: Engage in Public Scholarship! A Guidebook on Feminist and Accessible Communication","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Digital scholarship; Scholarly communication; Media studies; Sociology; Political science; Library science; Publishing; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.1823931263508581,"score_gpt":0.3015863969012314,"score_spread":0.11919327055037329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360825336","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013418585,0.62573946,0.002367682,0.027027318,0.025307192,0.0003296737,0.0010483075,0.0005089435,0.31632957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004093524,0.2930792,0.0018817806,0.010071961,0.005849606,0.0002598735,0.0012985982,0.00036787085,0.6830976],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869764,0.00023607728,0.00007817664,0.000069838774,0.0008252505,0.00009287761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704736,0.0011645046,0.00016389594,0.000075458855,0.0013352144,0.00021357641],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000832091,0.0010259363,0.0009282973,0.0042251307,0.0016857466,0.0051275855,0.0008253378,0.0019229841,0.070303984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004308737,0.00058867276,0.00047034063,0.0069241207,0.00082653365,0.0046160924,0.0011900477,0.0021669979,0.0361059],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001457216,0.000031976266,0.00003979495,0.00077621895,0.0000037478121,0.000030946325,0.00025872348,0.00003899415,0.00031670518,0.0028797858,0.8978664,0.09774218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.537689e-7,0.000012504177,0.00023788976,0.0004453403,0.0000023607806,0.00004184309,0.00016486157,0.000011755845,0.000058071437,0.0003169382,0.998703,0.000004434877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010553661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031494055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9948724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020512813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003440881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23519021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365505877","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.16059","title":"Brief Reviews of Books and Products: Copyright's Broken Promise: How to Restore the Law's Ability to Promote the Progress of Science","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Health and Medical Research Impacts","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Copyright law; Political science; Law; Engineering ethics; Law and economics; Intellectual property; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.18207913369812448,"score_gpt":0.40750337349519145,"score_spread":0.22542423979706697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365505877","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002527145,0.8331734,0.0007267936,0.058407653,0.047565695,0.00007445624,0.00019988291,0.0000921444,0.05950731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031826315,0.7520681,0.0012076554,0.04489477,0.03410583,0.00012350008,0.00035103442,0.00014100145,0.16392545],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995462,0.0008996306,0.00035944118,0.00025418916,0.0027828978,0.00024182307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893582,0.004912031,0.0006425945,0.0002468848,0.0042882655,0.0005519511],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027343181,0.0010425851,0.0009966091,0.0061021205,0.0022657467,0.006706439,0.0012519241,0.00529922,0.034925867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01354774,0.00067207124,0.000736928,0.008601996,0.0024776668,0.006335709,0.001515103,0.0049097324,0.016067918],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011426723,0.000025656414,0.000037812388,0.001171529,0.000008138719,0.000029236931,0.00015164919,0.00004887778,0.00022526424,0.007986708,0.9257621,0.06454167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016336664,0.000009404526,0.00015338814,0.00052254024,0.000004265392,0.000026165175,0.0000627628,0.0000098256305,0.000049037768,0.00085815304,0.9982968,0.000006021308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014940627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034338947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9932936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004567813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007830305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11683869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365505878","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.16111","title":"Brief Reviews of Books and Products: A History of Scientific Journals: Publishing at the Royal Society, 1665-2015","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scientific publishing; Library science; Classics; History; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.14313883910016834,"score_gpt":0.274895346428191,"score_spread":0.1317565073280227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365505878","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002887411,0.9786921,0.00014928436,0.006769297,0.0074723237,0.000009778815,0.00013623943,0.000018938135,0.0064632613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00457847,0.9615332,0.00044747494,0.0063074664,0.009973378,0.000025248399,0.00026977123,0.00004060278,0.016824387],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960775,0.0008840263,0.0006076444,0.0003400774,0.0018317285,0.00025909755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819635,0.006904858,0.0022795454,0.00038846032,0.0073260847,0.0011376784],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037887911,0.00082719035,0.0008759466,0.012843854,0.0015223419,0.00772654,0.0007854118,0.0024724079,0.016802127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018085366,0.00054601225,0.0006185091,0.017187297,0.0027408558,0.0072061406,0.0016615585,0.0026884906,0.006864194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013378334,0.000044533434,0.00086101866,0.01339749,0.00006510113,0.00015713368,0.0013061872,0.00012222212,0.00085626065,0.012116271,0.6452815,0.32565847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020236128,0.000018024348,0.0015286194,0.0039351117,0.000018761939,0.00013602553,0.00023604838,0.000009463914,0.00008093212,0.00053381774,0.99348974,0.000011458437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064263456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018559141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99227345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039348127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009338988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05620873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392638944","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.17765","title":"Brief Reviews of Books and Products: Algorithms of Resistance: The Everyday Fight against Platform Power","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Digital Media and Philosophy","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Resistance (ecology); Power (physics); Computer science; Algorithm; Biology; Physics","score_opus":0.04159617545645928,"score_gpt":0.2518419648612273,"score_spread":0.210245789404768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392638944","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00047881986,0.9169413,0.0027198866,0.0072980756,0.004445455,0.000027178055,0.00013276885,0.00009904574,0.06785752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008780313,0.87427306,0.003320903,0.0051849666,0.0064327186,0.000082879546,0.00043918568,0.00017419174,0.1013118],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985531,0.0003636431,0.000110479144,0.00016029309,0.000717101,0.00009536949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996962,0.0015736903,0.00018420434,0.00013882823,0.0009881628,0.00015303938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013448129,0.0008644283,0.0008655108,0.0044748667,0.0010946108,0.0054030702,0.0009886007,0.0018545303,0.02288614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062571466,0.0004813773,0.00045166546,0.0072870664,0.0022422555,0.005893102,0.0011160403,0.0021368545,0.015948089],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037718888,0.000030271583,0.00019140451,0.0032451744,0.000023655935,0.000072022536,0.00070331706,0.00046154473,0.00046454777,0.07754526,0.5380769,0.37914816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016332634,0.000014532748,0.0002614115,0.0008540523,0.0000056079675,0.00008648624,0.00013417279,0.00006357063,0.0000952507,0.0058111064,0.9926645,0.000007679202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032503048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006007305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02288614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023597616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002064301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07656175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395070851","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.16820","title":"Barriers and Opportunities in the Discoverability and Indexing of Student-Led Academic Journals","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Council of University Libraries; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.17174889355663367,"score_gpt":0.38301642202336045,"score_spread":0.21126752846672678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395070851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9607245,0.0018926689,0.0011429449,0.01020443,0.00013524295,0.00019209254,0.00040687562,0.00015396712,0.025147345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993946,0.00093738287,0.0012824149,0.00087761227,0.00011423806,0.000091353584,0.00021048557,0.000033483167,0.0025069045],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.961482,0.00887864,0.0040247873,0.001955682,0.020051256,0.0036077513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7417912,0.14014171,0.042662464,0.010114764,0.038008407,0.027281502],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031006167,0.00025153716,0.0005462379,0.004606038,0.0073938463,0.014382497,0.002400688,0.0013425798,0.00631004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15812522,0.0003930651,0.0003958366,0.006384723,0.0046965666,0.0053819455,0.006381417,0.0011868479,0.0010922904],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005142522,0.00057911634,0.4819773,0.0033528164,0.000091452384,0.0020183062,0.27512667,0.00031195403,0.004332406,0.00972709,0.017452555,0.20451607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000989245,0.00062128674,0.46555427,0.0019811862,0.00009077434,0.0021240003,0.34151593,0.00060870114,0.003823877,0.007610556,0.17572238,0.0002482083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06278729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07203745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9856175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008545462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035693713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16397828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399450667","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.17681","title":"Reusing Figures in Research: New License Clauses Eliminate Need for Permissions or Payments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"License; Reuse; Payment; Computer science; MIT License; Business; World Wide Web; Operating system; Waste management; Engineering","score_opus":0.8389947402438991,"score_gpt":0.6330120821596878,"score_spread":0.20598265808421123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399450667","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015866933,0.0037708562,0.2683402,0.057311177,0.016921312,0.007088734,0.0101672625,0.033696234,0.58683723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.123142675,0.008384155,0.5213935,0.028403657,0.007782784,0.0066616703,0.013649656,0.026485639,0.26409623],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94740146,0.016510788,0.008086488,0.0025919834,0.02305214,0.002357243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.566629,0.16316928,0.031083174,0.11449313,0.113755845,0.010869617],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.077127255,0.00092030043,0.0008444356,0.0084671695,0.0041486304,0.01674983,0.0038710786,0.0040377495,0.15326674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3060831,0.0018760783,0.0016147462,0.008283407,0.00721226,0.03551425,0.010950592,0.0056577674,0.11816882],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019320849,0.00026961247,0.0040258737,0.0020758691,0.00003673985,0.00035191284,0.004034976,0.00035828588,0.0049269362,0.09953059,0.5368025,0.3473934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028034981,0.000046354966,0.0022302656,0.0007630629,0.0000185981,0.0003340347,0.00071056606,0.00017870417,0.0017926277,0.0066975867,0.9871394,0.00006071424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031101967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006134091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9961289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046887337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017991854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51272833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401023374","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.17755","title":"Staffing of Library Publishing Programs in the United States and Canada: A Data-Driven Analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.13235331893708813,"score_gpt":0.29683597948620666,"score_spread":0.16448266054911853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401023374","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41360176,0.000988532,0.0016503304,0.0022629374,0.000044961238,0.00040368218,0.5738119,0.00031780824,0.006918208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66341025,0.0012711869,0.0073633827,0.00080878683,0.000050065217,0.00096761686,0.3198118,0.00018011392,0.0061368984],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99512285,0.0003258814,0.00032862468,0.00062001485,0.0024589777,0.0011437305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980642,0.001970758,0.001942083,0.00062001316,0.013061042,0.0017640665],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033020582,0.00061589375,0.000868395,0.009164282,0.0026644722,0.0033780346,0.0025101092,0.00059825665,0.003483479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015313053,0.0006602348,0.0018850358,0.023653902,0.0011611433,0.00097133126,0.0022499303,0.0014301718,0.0009765774],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001223884,0.00008581636,0.9347049,0.000312816,0.00028734838,0.00010484712,0.0011996555,0.003537553,0.00010998734,0.0014838326,0.045186084,0.012864938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030005684,0.0000411254,0.9514134,0.00031041197,0.00012606183,0.00006671772,0.003994588,0.0065084947,0.00047622636,0.00043577445,0.036502086,0.00009514277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9939626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9930068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99662197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048676826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10487845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35317677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404886431","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.18208","title":"Access for Whom? An Examination of Public-Facing Accessibility Practices in Library Accessibility Alliance Members’ Open Access Institutional Repositories","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Council of University Libraries","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.3472772325642557,"score_gpt":0.4658654650513983,"score_spread":0.11858823248714262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404886431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9757833,0.0006639414,0.0007965705,0.005886283,0.000016601187,0.00005007347,0.00011623837,0.000026176327,0.01666087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978934,0.00039044904,0.00041102216,0.0003543961,0.000012217497,0.000030494275,0.00006482303,0.000011467483,0.0008318128],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97649825,0.012272209,0.0026095773,0.0013278555,0.0055122236,0.001779869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8905969,0.05409295,0.034948103,0.005036903,0.011718168,0.0036070803],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02763819,0.0001335245,0.0003546072,0.0054742643,0.0046981005,0.008690808,0.0016200613,0.0014645772,0.004837353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10008164,0.0003704263,0.00031503718,0.0078013064,0.0067820423,0.015593459,0.010402476,0.0014235515,0.0005545499],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007343483,0.00018370703,0.4164931,0.00030517209,0.000035443296,0.0005585625,0.48861545,0.00010735764,0.00035049234,0.013966824,0.004281412,0.075029045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059786594,0.00008253159,0.15291646,0.0004632886,0.000018504541,0.00048953475,0.8214934,0.00037096435,0.0002314885,0.0018937461,0.021994444,0.00003971838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015595655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01871273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99837995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039044933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059184763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14616644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406049334","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.18265","title":"Implementation of Transformative Agreements at the University of Chicago Library: A Case Study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.04327643186052887,"score_gpt":0.3161057796512928,"score_spread":0.2728293477907639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406049334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90882516,0.0005245819,0.004684291,0.016997468,0.00012931849,0.00074791134,0.00004665336,0.00009438845,0.06795026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869261,0.0005074238,0.0029231205,0.0018544081,0.00004596298,0.00034612176,0.000029642866,0.000048020003,0.007319223],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9410318,0.04430596,0.001192539,0.0014818822,0.0047686524,0.0072190803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91350436,0.056996282,0.004971788,0.0044832285,0.0082932655,0.011751213],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040296875,0.00057067623,0.0006721356,0.0030000624,0.04283275,0.01725795,0.005315391,0.0076303463,0.006612667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062160138,0.0009984515,0.00078178203,0.0051983334,0.02265621,0.009956337,0.01569676,0.010464686,0.000924379],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002834239,0.003729559,0.020148322,0.00034956116,0.000033390636,0.020372195,0.7949689,0.0013834143,0.0007629262,0.08979968,0.011736603,0.05643192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055098924,0.00039061473,0.0041521364,0.0003333854,0.000025506572,0.0013939338,0.9357819,0.0011498578,0.001024799,0.00567958,0.04994831,0.00006496037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046092577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07130241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9827421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02694531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030370204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21311277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414769236","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.19779","title":"Evaluating Multilingual Metadata Quality in Crossref","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; Multilingualism; Categorization; Publishing; Sample (material); Quality (philosophy)","score_opus":0.25795847883341033,"score_gpt":0.48460896327261066,"score_spread":0.22665048443920033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414769236","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91235155,0.0015873912,0.058420457,0.0019346493,0.00011181444,0.0011944505,0.004824146,0.00061184826,0.018963736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95689464,0.00037830466,0.03665908,0.00026122655,0.00008885278,0.00065723096,0.0039155334,0.00014646747,0.0009987447],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8634559,0.055085663,0.029034028,0.008093589,0.042315457,0.0020153995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.38031155,0.3244323,0.11270754,0.054008063,0.12417289,0.0043676132],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15153125,0.0004746056,0.00085403473,0.021350188,0.0030191003,0.010110687,0.0020107029,0.0012294662,0.0050468794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4402376,0.00056832936,0.0009885408,0.022264445,0.0037451787,0.015189685,0.011959796,0.0010494957,0.0012271858],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041482516,0.00021035734,0.89033973,0.000919928,0.00024103723,0.0001712112,0.017174209,0.00088398857,0.0011933829,0.0063434727,0.0016606669,0.08044733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012838039,0.0010311052,0.82263505,0.0030328864,0.0005676646,0.0016474914,0.051018175,0.023463761,0.017795399,0.022552388,0.055758495,0.0003690973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058623757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052645616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9898893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032291769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005309946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80138344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414785156","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.20261","title":"From Course Packs to AI: Evolving Author and Publisher Rights in Journal Publishing Agreements","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Library Science and Information Systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Order (exchange); Inclusion (mineral); Permission; Electronic publishing","score_opus":0.025886900498134118,"score_gpt":0.2788984986787589,"score_spread":0.25301159818062474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414785156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8256803,0.0021827538,0.019741375,0.008134174,0.00030533245,0.0002918361,0.00017343092,0.00019254073,0.14329828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98046404,0.0009599108,0.008363849,0.0007020728,0.00016039929,0.000113156224,0.00012347246,0.00010952718,0.009003676],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96607536,0.014773108,0.0029974,0.0019212598,0.012862356,0.0013705342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80027896,0.13957167,0.024817219,0.009513589,0.020292947,0.005525609],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02948634,0.00020244883,0.00027062156,0.004849101,0.005995139,0.013573311,0.0012824368,0.0010871068,0.007904296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12526721,0.00038237136,0.00033670542,0.0063183485,0.007899852,0.022607233,0.007163637,0.001818112,0.0010874625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001808736,0.00025785822,0.1573335,0.0006324794,0.000035337674,0.0007538553,0.4109859,0.00037416903,0.0018771118,0.092441216,0.008039428,0.32708827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002396647,0.00023924977,0.16488945,0.0016317518,0.000057478428,0.0016468937,0.48130488,0.0020185332,0.0033648221,0.05341195,0.29127577,0.00013525433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021561105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023132514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9864267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004489412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062966323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15594053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7108631754","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.20194","title":"Publications Produced and Services Offered by Library Publishing Programs in the United States and Canada: A Data-Driven Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Staffing; Publishing; Service (business); Table (database); Order (exchange); Focus (optics)","score_opus":0.11000385768366996,"score_gpt":0.33369865505929525,"score_spread":0.22369479737562528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7108631754","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24479513,0.0008047307,0.0007604113,0.0014201218,0.000038801114,0.0002887016,0.74523413,0.0002451768,0.006412851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46508548,0.0012771316,0.0048482404,0.0006559271,0.000058026606,0.0009086255,0.51961875,0.00015801903,0.0073897303],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99566984,0.00023007698,0.00030752606,0.0005523114,0.0021757216,0.0010644974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977736,0.002324114,0.0025378973,0.0006834245,0.01454748,0.002171105],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026736697,0.00065507327,0.00088951754,0.01421226,0.00260017,0.0043924134,0.002247427,0.0006078071,0.005158862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014325654,0.0005923454,0.0016919329,0.033607725,0.0011251738,0.001127812,0.0024798387,0.0012997957,0.0016344844],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017455356,0.000105267405,0.8977489,0.0005344689,0.0003001765,0.00018404979,0.0014689348,0.0030842505,0.00017362316,0.002199411,0.07996936,0.014056941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003495383,0.000038436385,0.92801607,0.0003766883,0.00012240924,0.000101149686,0.0051054973,0.005417544,0.0005488024,0.0004948344,0.059634987,0.00010872744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99092776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9891186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9956076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03718078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07769845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2697667},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"}]}