{"meta":{"query_hash":"8bf10b5b369b","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication"},"cohort_total":41,"direct_labels_cover":3,"predictions_cover":41,"exported":41,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/8bf10b5b369b","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Librarianship+and+Scholarly+Communication"},"results":[{"id":"W2040552582","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.1102","title":"Library-Press Collaborations: A Study Taken on Behalf of the University of Arizona","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Alberta; Kent State University; University of North Texas; Oregon State University; University of Arizona; Johns Hopkins University; Association of Research Libraries; Syracuse University; Northwestern University; Utah State University; Purdue University","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Library science; Publishing; General partnership; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Management; Law","score_opus":0.027049110446849312,"score_gpt":0.19430493733353327,"score_spread":0.16725582688668394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040552582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.967367,0.0005792831,0.0034398336,0.0048192237,0.00010928645,0.0002322256,0.000003704733,0.000023577008,0.02342587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993573,0.000110964975,0.0054582544,0.00010061605,0.000013621222,3.6345554e-7,8.222397e-7,0.0000043002947,0.0007380258],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986556,0.00056842016,0.00032990763,0.000086431035,0.00029771242,0.000061919214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831283,0.00037793978,0.0005546907,0.00056475826,0.00013134962,0.000058423193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047372645,0.00007179256,0.00016407022,0.00014848499,0.00022831849,0.000673705,0.0017133036,0.000048502257,0.0000081348535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018254985,0.000053821434,0.000054952863,0.0006293735,0.00007353418,0.00995411,0.0004271239,0.00024704137,4.5975722e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043650944,0.0015442453,0.6074465,0.000046977537,0.00025085543,0.0000038267467,0.033792503,0.00022039123,0.00048407473,0.3092023,0.012498365,0.03407343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022989202,0.0012953323,0.9044311,0.00023448358,0.00004349738,0.000011478342,0.0031496063,0.0009416723,0.0024204091,0.01660515,0.06836767,0.00020070001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000075543644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000036695346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29698458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008210236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019509497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72164893},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2100283551","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.1105","title":"Point & Counterpoint The Purpose of Institutional Repositories: Green OA or Beyond?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Stewardship (theology); Counterpoint; Thriving; Institution; Library science; Political science; Publishing; Institutional repository; Publication; Scholarly communication; Public relations; World Wide Web; Sociology; Computer science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.42596659035908846,"score_gpt":0.4744248978785353,"score_spread":0.04845830751944685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100283551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9595287,0.0051074214,0.005472339,0.023968844,0.0004100054,0.00029964052,0.000012766138,0.0000072243965,0.0051930468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99138826,0.0008853119,0.00597631,0.00036614243,0.000103739134,0.0000056463814,0.000002684408,0.0000062239487,0.0012657025],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935814,0.0008687336,0.0013369125,0.00017622631,0.0038446882,0.00019200215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876231,0.005099268,0.0011815423,0.0011980818,0.004634632,0.0002633787],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018820891,0.000108534055,0.00029757596,0.006900523,0.0005211779,0.007641973,0.0036735414,0.00011724535,0.00030398043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019886583,0.000053598797,0.00013386282,0.019607587,0.00039880385,0.011514105,0.00077021966,0.00080554816,0.000031167758],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059067534,0.00072383886,0.4918452,0.00003676645,0.00022293194,0.000019524947,0.010683842,0.000043856282,0.009196489,0.06905084,0.05195153,0.36563453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010924896,0.0005107554,0.7695816,0.00009269815,0.000028301669,0.00037185094,0.0027578494,0.0005756096,0.00058701553,0.12283391,0.10137911,0.0001887787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028626708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032680804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36544573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059802624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049238914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123609639","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.1116","title":"On the Mark? Responses to a Sting","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership","field":"Nursing","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Sting; Computer science; History; Philosophy; Epistemology; Engineering","score_opus":0.06964416861627491,"score_gpt":0.31367789583045474,"score_spread":0.24403372721417982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123609639","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70939994,0.00080430746,0.00009109213,0.2864479,0.00032809618,0.00016025077,5.1132645e-7,0.0000144651385,0.0027534356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879547,0.000037672176,0.0038372388,0.0075014955,0.00018693916,0.000007919108,0.0000012048853,0.000017718576,0.00045515993],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755245,0.0015484199,0.00037342813,0.00009286016,0.00028206487,0.00015079726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950653,0.003632763,0.0003734445,0.00054356974,0.0002461909,0.00013878699],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002537579,0.00010126583,0.00013225697,0.00021538378,0.00051694526,0.002303964,0.00066016597,0.00007690923,0.000090932794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004072836,0.0000707272,0.000048432692,0.00026819383,0.00006492105,0.004787259,0.000022038255,0.00093123544,0.0000491265],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0056262803,0.0011210847,0.1572877,0.00009104821,0.00023206517,0.000005609706,0.19803543,0.00002631419,0.02293608,0.07875313,0.34270307,0.19318217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007304969,0.0008662365,0.86916924,0.0007003976,0.00008789123,0.00013853995,0.023732513,0.00005244924,0.0011653469,0.062840864,0.04025415,0.0002618549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000048525577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000034494487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7118816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004704932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008471837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99873173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132438686","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.1121","title":"Scholarly Communication at Canadian Research Libraries: Conversations with Librarians","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Wikis in Education and Collaboration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Guelph","funders":"Canadian Association of Research Libraries; Association of Research Libraries","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Scope (computer science); Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Library science; Publishing; Computer science","score_opus":0.07813666282704167,"score_gpt":0.3365969029888442,"score_spread":0.2584602401618025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132438686","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51381695,0.0054876176,0.001097219,0.22481371,0.00040748328,0.0007938767,0.000021195852,0.000103880484,0.25345805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981944,0.0019162584,0.011742795,0.0012395701,0.00025224886,0.000019995174,0.000046836667,0.00002877083,0.0028095122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933224,0.0045861946,0.00059642567,0.00019406999,0.0009191308,0.00038181792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944371,0.0015474788,0.0005010055,0.0009914665,0.0018516255,0.0006713066],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077001215,0.00015070547,0.00024237738,0.00080903876,0.004141415,0.00918285,0.0016147482,0.00030198382,0.00027329975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002915541,0.00014207844,0.0000530349,0.0015148477,0.0008266005,0.031637434,0.00015948433,0.0014669995,0.00003348352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011791324,0.00010948996,0.07005007,0.000012192691,0.000065120206,0.0000019202619,0.08909749,0.000013876761,0.00009144848,0.81143034,0.022026798,0.006983328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010403675,0.00025529516,0.073093854,0.00022526484,0.000049642716,0.000023822546,0.045410473,0.00006858818,0.000101185484,0.044189196,0.83526236,0.00027994486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01430607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.071018375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8132356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048032994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042437683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971551},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2140834332","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.1028","title":"Developing Open Access Journals: A Practical Guide","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Health Sciences Research and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Advice (programming); Electronic publishing; World Wide Web; Subject (documents); Computer science; Library science; Field (mathematics); Open access publishing; Subject matter; The Internet; Political science; Curriculum","score_opus":0.7349764763730774,"score_gpt":0.660533413607095,"score_spread":0.07444306276598234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140834332","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6917223,0.012507609,0.012711916,0.2397381,0.0016037188,0.0009874288,0.0000037264956,0.000025610885,0.04069961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9123915,0.006617336,0.07370561,0.0055989698,0.0008994913,0.000028561666,0.0000049111472,0.000016244727,0.00073737727],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.994727,0.003079475,0.0010989037,0.0000919005,0.0004952179,0.000507517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948846,0.0022301758,0.0010354628,0.00040727545,0.00073128846,0.0007111771],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01748077,0.00009337338,0.00024884474,0.00032501915,0.0015831358,0.0024948148,0.0020704567,0.00016288168,0.00036236874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073462245,0.000070776594,0.000035410903,0.0005955546,0.000074452444,0.053168762,0.0012137688,0.0021487768,0.00004082673],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010524678,0.000111515445,0.850926,0.00006436294,0.000027711312,0.0000015795359,0.0113496315,3.2665784e-7,0.00015280039,0.028163722,0.09748511,0.0116120195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050672964,0.00005084457,0.6853247,0.00045784915,0.000012438267,0.000058459562,0.007052174,0.000013959637,0.000024978965,0.008720834,0.29768822,0.00008875282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017755493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025386958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23413914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022724686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042679734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565430703","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2137","title":"Engaging Faculty and Reducing Costs by Leveraging Collections: A Pilot Project to Reduce Course Pack Use","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Leverage (statistics); Business; Course (navigation); Service (business); Privilege (computing); Computer science; Engineering management; World Wide Web; Marketing; Engineering; Computer security","score_opus":0.08800380650589312,"score_gpt":0.2876807528450094,"score_spread":0.19967694633911626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2565430703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.945032,0.001962492,0.028774478,0.020806206,0.00017632968,0.0003658923,0.000011766854,0.00009927523,0.0027715326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9642668,0.000623096,0.030888956,0.00054240384,0.000041462983,0.000010008463,0.000003007932,0.000013420095,0.003610852],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842805,0.00039136442,0.00045929404,0.0002246405,0.0003041533,0.0001925146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998259,0.00063658966,0.00031412812,0.00038333598,0.0001921261,0.00021482655],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090412784,0.00014802787,0.00019701426,0.00040363404,0.00072412816,0.006436362,0.00071103004,0.000054683383,0.0000043546274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006620648,0.00010832164,0.000036595397,0.0009477059,0.000054247455,0.024486903,0.00037239227,0.00034716498,0.0000016049132],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073992,0.0006613915,0.13644402,0.00004933987,0.00038983492,0.000027172911,0.031979892,0.000013514489,0.03963212,0.014000408,0.32822347,0.4478389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012214964,0.003423188,0.34356955,0.004620399,0.00013819944,0.0017060766,0.0059592715,0.0012241509,0.030449467,0.01506575,0.57920647,0.002422492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038207418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000027887002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44541642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008609411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033736002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99459505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604895157","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2104","title":"Open Access Policies and Academic Freedom: Understanding and Addressing Conflicts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Academic freedom; Context (archaeology); Political science; Public relations; Commercialization; Vagueness; Public administration; Freedom of information; Higher education; Law","score_opus":0.9468948604005198,"score_gpt":0.6709462950792823,"score_spread":0.27594856532123757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604895157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9499938,0.012084626,0.0019208074,0.025926713,0.0001614486,0.00016775864,0.000007696194,0.000004760817,0.00973241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877113,0.009942224,0.0017891757,0.00026098493,0.000065870685,0.0000010499963,6.14867e-7,0.000007470123,0.00022129521],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99635005,0.0005214204,0.00068106863,0.00022950541,0.0019950652,0.00022289284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932629,0.0033065954,0.0012815106,0.00091692,0.00080946233,0.00042261413],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.024389861,0.00010595274,0.00031931224,0.008434123,0.0019793692,0.13906986,0.009499614,0.00016294823,0.000023249539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026407246,0.00007483061,0.000035493835,0.005038121,0.0005624656,0.047020186,0.007856622,0.0010624342,0.0000012382914],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006230659,0.000021478796,0.9136091,0.0000071025875,0.000025967154,0.0000046089667,0.0017113866,0.0000012092248,0.00076172175,0.03300374,0.0023622855,0.048429128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008905741,0.000081396814,0.8724763,0.00012254732,0.0000128048605,0.00006234083,0.001873742,0.00039665136,0.00010901688,0.118315645,0.0055543194,0.0001046821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001614925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018311255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.092049666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044929086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018178213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611121576","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2196","title":"From the Ground Up: A Group Editorial on the Most Pressing Issues in Scholarly Communication","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Pressing; Common ground; Scholarly communication; Group (periodic table); Political science; Engineering physics; Telecommunications; Media studies; Library science; Sociology; Engineering; Computer science; Physics; Mechanical engineering; Law; Publishing; Communication; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.046078614963587644,"score_gpt":0.2773644810567435,"score_spread":0.23128586609315585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611121576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76855534,0.012068205,0.0007976791,0.21042651,0.0046372768,0.0003188352,0.000007400246,0.000043968255,0.0031447997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880463,0.001612936,0.005376262,0.0015024965,0.0033181943,0.000007865685,0.000008510388,0.000014068789,0.00011337983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966158,0.0018522156,0.0005819531,0.00019096336,0.00057777,0.00018124352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935675,0.0018572138,0.0010423246,0.0032575026,0.0001853459,0.00009006022],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034111748,0.000171966,0.00023508015,0.00010459415,0.002042973,0.030119028,0.0092737535,0.00017851543,0.000011276421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00080942514,0.00010363805,0.0000733955,0.00021395343,0.00018439596,0.055709727,0.0012280528,0.00202903,0.0000061244195],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062029844,0.0005856466,0.14782515,0.000031805423,0.00027615324,0.000014662498,0.079769164,0.000027788394,0.0037901546,0.6247246,0.07218155,0.07015301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014268137,0.00017476299,0.7345088,0.0007261938,0.000024867157,0.0000117104955,0.0019976576,0.0010328993,0.00025076472,0.12707493,0.13253118,0.00023940422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010460676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010522019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58668363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030284607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001327669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99925625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753955980","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2182","title":"Measuring Cost per Use of Library-Funded Open Access Article Processing Charges: Examination and Implications of One Method","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Payment; Publishing; Actuarial science; Data science; World Wide Web; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.8868527694239678,"score_gpt":0.6048805113465975,"score_spread":0.28197225807737036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753955980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97130847,0.002745899,0.016740263,0.007019798,0.00003675484,0.0003227346,0.00001893943,0.000004596081,0.0018025441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94743115,0.0019778605,0.050348002,0.000058245307,0.000018862132,0.000004932143,0.0000021980602,0.000009330813,0.00014939618],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959452,0.0009475953,0.0010408107,0.00022327578,0.0016805668,0.00016251161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99081355,0.003111881,0.0022381563,0.0011818109,0.002419814,0.00023479974],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01840782,0.00009035418,0.00036734968,0.006641776,0.00071864686,0.036455985,0.0059312494,0.00010122731,0.00005476874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020559875,0.00006957087,0.00005751575,0.007282121,0.00022076229,0.06562548,0.0028758734,0.00042981523,8.7593025e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048528982,0.00014997665,0.6533249,0.000016585685,0.000020933123,2.7424576e-7,0.00072939356,0.000005014393,0.009035011,0.0050699394,0.00013146717,0.33146796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005812958,0.000077904595,0.9678118,0.000111275134,0.000019906836,0.000009129058,0.00033099437,0.0011041261,0.0069472045,0.022152513,0.00078111346,0.00007269671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000739979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009699565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33139527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020972304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026710672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783217427","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2209","title":"What’s in a Name? Exploring identity in the field of library journal publishing","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Library Science and Information Systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University; University of Ottawa; York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Service (business); Terminology; Scholarly communication; Public relations; Ambiguity; Directory; Library science; Electronic publishing; Discoverability; Identity (music); World Wide Web; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Business; The Internet; Law; Marketing","score_opus":0.08522159717476123,"score_gpt":0.29678966148625496,"score_spread":0.21156806431149372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783217427","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9373778,0.0035589107,0.009285274,0.045610968,0.00079330686,0.00009944593,3.2978016e-7,0.000010269343,0.0032636987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99011874,0.002162823,0.005307925,0.0022514495,0.0001361233,0.0000018884592,5.126574e-7,0.000003061057,0.000017466426],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767023,0.0007269701,0.0009000647,0.00007378473,0.0004909383,0.00013802682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800247,0.0005805433,0.0007107186,0.00050298055,0.00013207948,0.000071229995],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048647462,0.000072777155,0.00016996599,0.0005877652,0.00017831672,0.019809214,0.0038749762,0.00007200715,0.000013073106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005548086,0.00005045807,0.000054040964,0.0012275296,0.00006471253,0.46657208,0.00040131185,0.0009171628,0.0000019114036],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007483534,0.00016062173,0.39510745,0.000043062584,0.000024382603,0.000024409172,0.29532832,0.000016729926,0.0002055382,0.20519246,0.0071121724,0.096710004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018324811,0.0007749833,0.788581,0.0019187727,0.000005269062,0.000608983,0.06345021,0.0022417183,0.0015726469,0.11429895,0.024425946,0.00028900002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015609394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009073331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44676286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013091345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022076083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9812083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790464658","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2216","title":"Effective Practices and Strategies for Open Access Outreach: A Qualitative Study","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Outreach; Jargon; Public relations; Influencer marketing; Qualitative research; Relevance (law); Political science; Medical education; Psychology; Medicine; Business; Sociology; Marketing","score_opus":0.854673664994753,"score_gpt":0.7095175612684768,"score_spread":0.1451561037262762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790464658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98482656,0.00263482,0.003960293,0.0040700524,0.00011545302,0.0010561437,0.000011412462,0.0000045658367,0.0033207235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941939,0.00027853565,0.005092981,0.00012791374,0.00008143734,0.00003955622,0.0000010937647,0.000007357167,0.00017718735],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99375904,0.0031638152,0.00075785985,0.00028739398,0.0018499385,0.00018197716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9731099,0.019519279,0.0019706097,0.00064211764,0.0045162016,0.00024186254],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.057188634,0.00010849184,0.0003433911,0.008690367,0.0006771921,0.07715146,0.0055810465,0.00007925932,0.000027579574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051695302,0.00007023242,0.000051074137,0.01586103,0.00026100167,0.053103317,0.0023480228,0.00049587677,0.0000030976614],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015838598,0.0012019823,0.4465255,0.000018760442,0.00029739516,0.000006160706,0.20588012,0.0000011506495,0.0005184907,0.03134305,0.0075258226,0.3050977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021373886,0.003116582,0.5211443,0.000034728655,0.000040973267,0.000018307335,0.24250078,0.00019396227,0.00011722348,0.22277127,0.0077856733,0.0001388637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017215883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009865713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30495885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002954003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036381133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800148785","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2187","title":"Dissertation-to-Book Publication Patterns Among a Sample of R1 Institutions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; University of Toronto; University of Oklahoma; University of Kansas; University of Minnesota; University of Notre Dame; University of Washington; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Subject (documents); Library science; Openness to experience; The arts; Sample (material); Subject matter; Discipline; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Computer science; Psychology; Law; Pedagogy; Curriculum","score_opus":0.5213068775118257,"score_gpt":0.5402604555768521,"score_spread":0.0189535780650264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800148785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94813246,0.0007482484,0.042746924,0.00557556,0.00014554974,0.00015209224,0.000026305228,0.000006926991,0.0024659177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900569,0.00031494262,0.009006768,0.00026554806,0.000068416964,0.000003995272,0.00000956074,0.0000062377117,0.00026765134],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955279,0.00050422165,0.0010919995,0.00018997537,0.002507932,0.00017795709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876937,0.0032588951,0.00091835635,0.00089834054,0.006850047,0.0003806056],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012394675,0.0000874197,0.00023469541,0.015945861,0.00040623243,0.0050225444,0.0024950432,0.00009875516,0.00025247983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04615643,0.00006450796,0.000089763416,0.02799231,0.00022559981,0.01232399,0.00037312222,0.00039791802,0.000022020062],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039617396,0.000118532065,0.94260556,0.0000037093628,0.000020309946,4.2767007e-7,0.0021596104,0.000004785144,0.0010649721,0.014666887,0.0032420703,0.036073517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030372015,0.00025777394,0.9718322,0.00004302636,0.000009221564,0.000006031712,0.00084300945,0.00025129336,0.0010380723,0.008994887,0.016346116,0.000074636075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013420617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006940882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041924406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041842508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000347089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99601036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802900348","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2256","title":"DMP Assistant [Tool Review]","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Data management plan; Plan (archaeology); Globe; Sample (material); Computer science; Data management; Process (computing); World Wide Web; Best practice; Open source; Database; Political science; Psychology; Operating system; Software","score_opus":0.11276516784107112,"score_gpt":0.3530594450017847,"score_spread":0.2402942771607136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802900348","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037145805,0.11640184,0.5662113,0.22644946,0.00057192467,0.0006852664,0.0000063376497,0.00012087131,0.052407216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6235762,0.154973,0.21484153,0.0052728523,0.0002368184,0.000006675825,0.0000066088423,0.000015785228,0.0010704709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778867,0.0009243186,0.000490968,0.00013876427,0.0005123231,0.00014494058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970489,0.00038639773,0.00059304957,0.0014586215,0.00040212742,0.000110896304],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005559187,0.000082452265,0.00016792574,0.00019205909,0.00026955828,0.0080739,0.0038534275,0.00004169084,0.000020686684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019153743,0.000065690656,0.000047304304,0.0004759868,0.00009511099,0.14195144,0.0009557655,0.00059578137,0.00001609937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006353094,0.00019076273,0.010810224,0.00021755107,0.00015078156,0.000032793658,0.0010572041,2.7057516e-7,0.0010932062,0.805033,0.046781685,0.13456894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069752266,0.0005469733,0.107746854,0.0014379355,0.000053089374,0.00015225423,0.00011518069,0.0003743825,0.00032147128,0.017291427,0.8710323,0.00023062313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000054011593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000024037997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8242506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024956265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014130818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9929558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902667247","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2253","title":"Confused about copyright? Assessing Researchers’ Comprehension of Copyright Transfer Agreements","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Subject (documents); Comprehension; Publication; Probit model; Scopus; Confusion; Psychology; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Library science; Econometrics; Economics; Law; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.2204661753787647,"score_gpt":0.39039053199283497,"score_spread":0.16992435661407027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902667247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53691393,0.003692252,0.43360814,0.011886461,0.00023802559,0.0003961121,0.0000064184733,0.000039788203,0.013218835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93884045,0.0025888106,0.05807767,0.00022230708,0.00005791551,0.0000019249794,0.0000073680835,0.000010683781,0.00019285192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99589235,0.0018503031,0.00075423886,0.00021873925,0.0010301352,0.00025421305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99617225,0.0008905254,0.00049187994,0.0013642878,0.0008691459,0.00021189226],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005216345,0.00013458585,0.0002872693,0.00049493107,0.00042810276,0.008251624,0.0039594076,0.00010222824,0.000047246656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006016128,0.00010919565,0.0000695685,0.00064139767,0.00036534364,0.11373819,0.00075854966,0.0008912503,0.0000066680163],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00086029567,0.0013307305,0.05595685,0.00034288003,0.00086702016,0.00008221942,0.017201064,0.000009531862,0.10739853,0.7014461,0.008732556,0.1057722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008305532,0.0027878652,0.7386201,0.0020664136,0.00016711125,0.00012814562,0.00224585,0.0102465255,0.037194442,0.02829582,0.16915904,0.0007831718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000040186143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009338644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6826632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040427232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002535625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9927779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941622362","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2243","title":"Whose Research is it Anyway? Academic Social Networks Versus Institutional Repositories","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Institutional repository; Institution; Inclusion (mineral); Scholarly communication; Public relations; Political science; Institutional research; Work (physics); Social institution; Internet privacy; Library science; Sociology; World Wide Web; Social science; Computer science; Higher education; Publishing; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.29921534314235004,"score_gpt":0.43063155096471384,"score_spread":0.1314162078223638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941622362","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63180304,0.015042097,0.07690277,0.23072381,0.00231703,0.0007941513,0.000008580817,0.000086370994,0.04232217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98467225,0.0052068033,0.008514625,0.00040139098,0.00032649067,0.00000432269,0.000007218042,0.000007931828,0.0008589621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963232,0.0015184205,0.00051423174,0.00022479151,0.0011394304,0.000279916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965626,0.001320521,0.0004466626,0.0009804699,0.0005459249,0.00014379263],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008134194,0.00010149905,0.00017460974,0.0003902293,0.00083273347,0.010253707,0.004370874,0.00017430552,0.000015992895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00113028,0.000092284885,0.000056996643,0.0008135079,0.0001797799,0.13741207,0.0017846914,0.002864494,0.000017475686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047544524,0.00009486518,0.02027585,0.000031758755,0.00015202063,0.000021625,0.0049564433,0.00004689213,0.0006659513,0.9411632,0.017514158,0.014601811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005331475,0.0012039418,0.2855414,0.000482377,0.000058986257,0.00014763093,0.0041020704,0.008847993,0.000474614,0.021860162,0.67136693,0.00058240985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020289383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000021556802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.919303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009663623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038760543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972565218","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2334","title":"JLSC Board Editorial 2019","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Global Health Workforce Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Editorial board; Political science; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.037737809988983594,"score_gpt":0.3745965832406652,"score_spread":0.3368587732516816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972565218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93225414,0.0067819003,0.000056379526,0.011650105,0.020900175,0.0005457656,0.000007846172,0.000046633886,0.027757084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9758027,0.0033546297,0.0041985908,0.0016502258,0.01050463,0.000006994617,0.00001616659,0.00003262415,0.004433422],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966392,0.001496514,0.0009620413,0.000119838594,0.0004732167,0.00030917866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965191,0.0011064752,0.00092762645,0.00067109795,0.000521723,0.00025400598],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026641004,0.000131375,0.00035968778,0.00015837909,0.0005133187,0.00022522878,0.00075002917,0.0003926789,0.00034606946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003793737,0.000109593,0.000074448,0.00022826789,0.00004517464,0.0051691937,0.00016893422,0.0024546261,0.00027562366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045791327,0.00006448061,0.56953794,0.00010604289,0.00004435017,0.0000018027863,0.0068206773,0.0000042868364,0.00039418213,0.017627655,0.40247586,0.0024647892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002016691,0.00028057856,0.13614562,0.00087464496,0.000029823635,0.000007266263,0.0033840558,0.000013930107,0.000014226409,0.0072542853,0.84983927,0.0001396194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001431638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016357313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44736338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010931054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005549084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3026806326","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2329","title":"“You Need to Make it as Easy as Possible for Me”: Creating Scholarly Communication Reports for Liaison Librarians","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Practicum; Publishing; Context (archaeology); Relevance (law); Backup; Library science; Public relations; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.04898524726330595,"score_gpt":0.28185855767095264,"score_spread":0.2328733104076467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3026806326","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23018824,0.010373168,0.21380895,0.5201552,0.00050422264,0.0026105822,0.000035424942,0.0004015269,0.021922715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6751861,0.00034265633,0.3073935,0.015944375,0.000269049,0.000063506355,0.000056054658,0.000054607422,0.00069018005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99664754,0.00064540206,0.0013749484,0.00044146832,0.000518094,0.00037255746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945324,0.0011578924,0.0013326937,0.0016872418,0.0006456231,0.00064416183],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023665365,0.00030803587,0.00053493585,0.0003437929,0.0010425372,0.012420181,0.0037423724,0.000274651,0.000022109594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019389086,0.00029524756,0.0002465071,0.0008845158,0.000052225616,0.041610777,0.00087242975,0.0009919249,0.000010312453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026299183,0.00086357835,0.060000457,0.0006751806,0.0007905478,0.0000717964,0.099753596,0.00066382426,0.017536065,0.7037586,0.030552894,0.08270357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0073850565,0.0060567264,0.048079222,0.0020166903,0.00037640837,0.00087668496,0.012518597,0.028460687,0.011642782,0.2309652,0.6496294,0.0019925123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000059860584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010632847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61907655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039731218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062213244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043225519","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2335","title":"Showcasing Institutional Research: Curating Library Exhibits to Support Scholarly Communication","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Digital and Traditional Archives Management","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Scholarly communication; Outreach; Promotion (chess); Library science; Digital scholarship; Service (business); Public relations; Academic library; Best practice; Relevance (law); Sociology; Community engagement; Political science; Computer science; Publishing; Business","score_opus":0.26445242356463683,"score_gpt":0.2995002243757766,"score_spread":0.035047800811139784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043225519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41431484,0.001487405,0.0005409332,0.122782946,0.00016402999,0.00042852564,0.000076998855,0.00009992259,0.4601044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988158,0.0003452373,0.0063676354,0.0039665285,0.00041077824,0.000008875206,0.00010600087,0.000023799363,0.0006131428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976921,0.0006094244,0.00067895197,0.000174684,0.0006326053,0.00021225309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981717,0.00046147092,0.00029476488,0.000378317,0.00034070626,0.00035302909],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011694694,0.00014851839,0.00022053624,0.0003594894,0.0013116598,0.010273375,0.0011699068,0.00003750246,0.0002030997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005049686,0.0001338065,0.00009168256,0.00023966172,0.00033359785,0.03878596,0.0006488062,0.0012858484,0.000061981744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013388229,0.00012625822,0.0010814995,0.00004015462,0.00006187494,0.000012938822,0.02954365,0.000023872275,0.00015314194,0.92623377,0.011041747,0.03154719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010740248,0.0011338837,0.033123057,0.00069817045,0.00005060015,0.000056324137,0.00870806,0.00017916613,0.00017977969,0.15087387,0.80352765,0.00039539978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012273982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000071069676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79248595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030121108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022647087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046613009","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2325","title":"Open Badges for Promoting Open Practices in the Institutional Repository: A Pilot Project","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Online Learning and Analytics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Canadian Association of Research Libraries; Association of Research Libraries","keywords":"Incentive; Open data; Open source; Process (computing); Business; Public relations; Sample (material); Value (mathematics); Compliance (psychology); Closed-ended question; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Psychology","score_opus":0.2242966629908382,"score_gpt":0.3817352003937551,"score_spread":0.15743853740291688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046613009","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26383406,0.0025363534,0.026249673,0.6978246,0.00013452157,0.0015940403,0.0000039069246,0.000033934924,0.0077889306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8999673,0.00008799101,0.09834577,0.0014538968,0.00009306578,0.000011863473,0.0000028752895,0.000004248515,0.00003294921],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837315,0.0008247197,0.00038764,0.00013440964,0.00019160748,0.00008848813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792296,0.000591639,0.0009340051,0.00035655117,0.00014418353,0.000050653667],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033376864,0.00006997612,0.00015517382,0.000068511275,0.00047944507,0.010100092,0.005575547,0.0000359226,4.358196e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001974792,0.000047710997,0.000029276727,0.0003733071,0.00003440413,0.016648846,0.000987697,0.0006557163,3.8189117e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001061837,0.0018292125,0.13958174,0.0002672239,0.00026938308,0.00013448086,0.118910596,0.0003813086,0.0034186514,0.6584117,0.006127386,0.06960653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015013813,0.011356045,0.2240835,0.0024723986,0.0002645353,0.002240851,0.01867345,0.28471208,0.000940937,0.13287923,0.306101,0.0012621607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006380735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008238965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69637066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014294079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005804981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3083918487","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2371","title":"Using Outreach Weeks to Examine Labor, Assessment and Value in Open Advocacy","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Public relations; Scope (computer science); Outreach; Work (physics); Action (physics); Political science; Parallels; Value (mathematics); Resource (disambiguation); Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.10885553035346483,"score_gpt":0.33312132968982017,"score_spread":0.22426579933635532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3083918487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9190211,0.0021443823,0.013688362,0.06316211,0.00005325051,0.00019128805,0.0000014726569,0.000015826316,0.0017221688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8065615,0.00021790573,0.18928657,0.003868925,0.000042711206,0.0000013817629,0.0000015331657,0.000006889653,0.000012525197],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985009,0.000577467,0.00043138326,0.00017122328,0.00019664658,0.00012238324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882144,0.00019019413,0.00024672766,0.00042550423,0.00006792292,0.00024820934],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009758647,0.000105821164,0.00023790181,0.00015848895,0.00013588928,0.0038181765,0.002211339,0.00006182191,0.000005349062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006523793,0.00009366362,0.000021563485,0.0005344759,0.000018668634,0.019361444,0.0013734933,0.00052647514,9.005188e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014809571,0.0002834356,0.73739004,0.00007451293,0.000073489435,0.000050923194,0.037179124,0.00043207844,0.0075976998,0.16685595,0.0005276685,0.04938701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014793699,0.0004382654,0.96278673,0.00023577495,0.000015176479,0.000044796197,0.001319903,0.019066408,0.00022936337,0.008428679,0.005748336,0.0002071644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001146014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000066454236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22539674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021173633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026196573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134355442","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2399","title":"Problematizing Peer Review: Academic Librarians’ Pedagogical Approaches to Peer Review","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Peer review; Information literacy; Equity (law); Peer feedback; Process (computing); Literacy; Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Pedagogy; Medical education; Computer science; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.4968008575047343,"score_gpt":0.40816675869976987,"score_spread":0.08863409880496442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134355442","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033897213,0.15429236,0.00039279615,0.7943558,0.00015041528,0.00041826724,0.000006327893,0.000034753302,0.046959545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07118185,0.6019017,0.06424463,0.19549465,0.0009990196,0.000057761863,0.00020931369,0.00004799304,0.06586309],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948822,0.0015073228,0.001191353,0.0001728523,0.0019788542,0.00026736566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99645865,0.0004074505,0.00070177467,0.00052644097,0.0014635576,0.00044215051],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011614336,0.00014896116,0.0004206487,0.00015886684,0.00068253325,0.002112256,0.001383725,0.00016981171,0.00039559157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009347748,0.000121686244,0.00014773353,0.0011563569,0.00012918738,0.06332025,0.00028179467,0.0012777834,0.000040517356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022924332,0.00009849319,0.008111959,0.001319312,0.000048412312,0.000011131349,0.05930876,0.000003868639,0.000065721004,0.37927124,0.51296705,0.03877111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018106579,0.000043071403,0.0049590375,0.0065197917,0.00004650585,0.000057366655,0.0045555313,0.000007626395,0.00003179875,0.007426469,0.9760025,0.00016921731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007741964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000015489444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59886116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040281884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009693916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153642349","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2401","title":"Faculty Survey on OER: Perceptions, Behaviors, and Implications for Library Practice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Open Education and E-Learning","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Open educational resources; Library science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Perception; Political science; Computer science; Psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.0853870494932108,"score_gpt":0.35118564874286007,"score_spread":0.26579859924964927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153642349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6544953,0.005562498,0.03672296,0.2922106,0.00040241648,0.00049697177,0.000094454255,0.00012839501,0.009886374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8579435,0.0021407695,0.13761443,0.0016127437,0.000053395837,0.000009629215,0.00016570654,0.000012961201,0.00044690561],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832606,0.0008893758,0.00037102314,0.00016637807,0.00013669509,0.00011045936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973421,0.001201342,0.00036373414,0.0005109308,0.0004250106,0.00015686406],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012598678,0.00009357352,0.000151243,0.00012752223,0.0005384,0.00345988,0.0006885336,0.00008608154,0.000014286076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012334975,0.00008849678,0.000048530495,0.0003304023,0.000036676385,0.014346581,0.00023054627,0.0005936826,0.0000032403375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105487365,0.0007606265,0.50502723,0.000023130962,0.00008971624,0.0000032737003,0.01001398,0.000017838276,0.0014358636,0.37829584,0.030896625,0.073330365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004151991,0.00013432986,0.95676,0.00004462819,0.000023675977,0.00011209267,0.0019587807,0.00005526428,0.000084056715,0.0030256114,0.03727937,0.00010699302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013424292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005650106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45173275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018282553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032794042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161804807","doi":"10.7710/2162-3309.2432","title":"JLSC Board Editorial 2021","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Communication and COVID-19 Impact","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Globe; Conversation; Equity (law); Political science; Public relations; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Action (physics); Editorial board; Work (physics); Media studies; Sociology; Criminology; Law; Library science; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.045934895211961514,"score_gpt":0.3331333323285728,"score_spread":0.28719843711661125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161804807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4045408,0.045926023,0.0016045355,0.31290177,0.02035933,0.00041738947,0.000015844127,0.00011221281,0.2141221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977269,0.010477762,0.0036690233,0.0010070932,0.006422994,0.0000021867663,0.0000073914134,0.000012063264,0.0011324701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969181,0.0018531203,0.00043991348,0.00008982151,0.0005399268,0.00015915782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99730635,0.0007789864,0.00037449153,0.0006455938,0.00065070816,0.00024389857],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025432147,0.00008539213,0.00019584715,0.00011269935,0.0007757432,0.0020553037,0.00090287096,0.00017853052,0.0003250513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026964291,0.00008405778,0.00010967335,0.0004203778,0.00016202722,0.005568302,0.00019067449,0.00088745804,0.00001263773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003577503,0.00075004407,0.10332652,0.000029255478,0.00030232358,0.00003639768,0.107728295,0.000010047853,0.0042781937,0.33580714,0.27353552,0.17383848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065482996,0.00004480345,0.020383354,0.00007026192,0.000033145105,0.000010726574,0.008162724,0.0000044374656,0.000120303754,0.013871714,0.9565313,0.00011239257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018772765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002775308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6829958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008189693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012584256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99898064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176676922","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.12914","title":"Academic Librarians, Open Access, and the Ethics of Care","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Ethics of care; Nursing ethics; Information ethics; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Competence (human resources); Applied ethics; Framing (construction); Public relations; Engineering ethics; Nursing; Political science; Medicine; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.22987986170220975,"score_gpt":0.4842959798355384,"score_spread":0.25441611813332865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176676922","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054338656,0.027479792,0.00018746655,0.82865494,0.00026883115,0.00023392623,0.0000060950974,0.000008838654,0.08882147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96907645,0.02346759,0.0031717971,0.0036466816,0.000113191134,0.000003575615,0.000007246802,0.0000062966287,0.0005071895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99622315,0.0028516361,0.00046694942,0.000074717296,0.00030230626,0.000081245955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953742,0.0026908084,0.00068207784,0.00031849951,0.00084899005,0.00008539381],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048188693,0.0000575153,0.00017662141,0.000085305626,0.00091079413,0.0056807464,0.0016387091,0.00018953362,0.000083378196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007507993,0.000043467953,0.00003664423,0.0006078513,0.00043247224,0.026404684,0.0005351266,0.002349235,6.532225e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007551329,0.000022582191,0.017924784,0.00001613953,0.000029919793,5.8410836e-7,0.11309806,5.8310206e-7,0.000045090397,0.8604382,0.0019973686,0.006351144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015877383,0.000034328976,0.06129387,0.00024405049,0.000101397396,0.000024588417,0.09941417,0.0000044353565,0.00024849895,0.16771583,0.6692135,0.00011762127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005478511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002431847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91473776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020195665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031486866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184584196","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.12915","title":"Review of Mapping Scholarly Communication Infrastructure: A Bibliographic Scan of Digital Scholarly Communication Infrastructure","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Publishing; Information infrastructure; Digital era; Computer science; World Wide Web; Library science; Political science; The Internet; Information system","score_opus":0.04746837697579249,"score_gpt":0.2446011519423304,"score_spread":0.19713277496653792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184584196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54606605,0.3923239,0.00013700474,0.0059020305,0.00026694816,0.0005359772,0.00027321855,0.00006807247,0.05442677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8852043,0.109831944,0.0031273747,0.001042795,0.00011218669,0.00000927062,0.00030900454,0.00005339301,0.0003096961],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99477303,0.0012893373,0.002390453,0.00028188687,0.00093960715,0.00032569363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898291,0.0007136755,0.00282148,0.0022755067,0.004106164,0.00025402318],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027963645,0.0004125594,0.000998752,0.0016560252,0.0008835764,0.013347347,0.002683505,0.0002841086,0.00046187924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018104423,0.00038445837,0.0004719363,0.0014282473,0.0009090701,0.06220006,0.00087525346,0.0027788505,0.00000353494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004297906,0.0010693903,0.12604547,0.006718817,0.0016269563,0.000019347237,0.0600141,0.000022179333,0.002258314,0.6846091,0.028066026,0.08912046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004190313,0.0008606741,0.19701594,0.04293171,0.0007871818,0.00047005498,0.03983764,0.000042201926,0.0006797422,0.23816876,0.4735603,0.0014554773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000060849005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000703994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44644037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008929392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057611836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283457399","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.13831","title":"How Open Is the U15? A Preliminary Analysis of Open Access Publishing in Canadian Academic Libraries","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Mandate; Library science; Open science; Scholarly communication; Political science; Open data; Public relations; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.7234356462162446,"score_gpt":0.5724775161838102,"score_spread":0.1509581300324344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283457399","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76003075,0.011292871,0.00013219031,0.22209084,0.00012376245,0.0004661671,0.000104096995,0.0000023420996,0.005756985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995679,0.0011393775,0.0007969324,0.0016176421,0.000016913618,0.000016595366,0.000012598002,0.000007804144,0.00071310886],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916175,0.0029104475,0.0011429089,0.00029532038,0.0036919545,0.00034188564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890254,0.006436755,0.0014547748,0.0013906369,0.0012501117,0.00044233273],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.061238874,0.00010505126,0.0004911128,0.045579378,0.0010293953,0.16543077,0.043627597,0.00011623821,0.0003621887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028298689,0.000069426605,0.00013589559,0.14605564,0.00015639755,0.11056222,0.01872517,0.0023347638,4.9453547e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012032741,0.00005670114,0.9298824,0.0000019086447,0.00012878586,0.0000060481416,0.003789508,0.00010268479,0.000026086725,0.0090675745,0.023280857,0.033537094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044797335,0.0001340434,0.8958734,0.00001699692,0.000059921957,0.00001109449,0.006923723,0.0022738716,0.000035548503,0.03469718,0.059436955,0.000089239365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04437505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008185272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23564827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016161628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002233405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4295630651","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.14421","title":"Free and Open-Source Automated Open Access Preprint Harvesting","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Upload; World Wide Web; Computer science; Metadata; Identifier; JavaScript; License; Preprint; Unique identifier; Open source; MIT License; Process (computing); Scholarly communication; Publishing; Software; Political science; Operating system","score_opus":0.24536835431654833,"score_gpt":0.41740496308885655,"score_spread":0.17203660877230822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4295630651","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5260912,0.0068514687,0.21441373,0.20018192,0.00035850253,0.0026282456,0.00003282449,0.0004024859,0.049039617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90140855,0.0011980038,0.09533482,0.0009845505,0.000019433543,0.00003350031,0.000008394145,0.000014100905,0.0009986704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965843,0.0020864739,0.00045540393,0.00024340012,0.00047731868,0.0001530795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963667,0.00071191316,0.0007900483,0.0018486904,0.00013038165,0.00015229888],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0088851685,0.00009033785,0.00018737608,0.00025261813,0.0010277197,0.11402585,0.030151408,0.00002665476,0.000021918593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019378181,0.0000854562,0.000019568131,0.00057736115,0.000050849787,0.33841962,0.0819072,0.0010017414,5.963203e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033625725,0.0006595137,0.13457327,0.00008504249,0.0003257011,0.000090987625,0.0071911644,0.00084962737,0.0012795393,0.64293927,0.024500396,0.18716922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038521271,0.0006250067,0.55028325,0.00021435924,0.00004344817,0.0005035315,0.0019325862,0.040238343,0.00020415364,0.047208365,0.35445142,0.00044339127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037119584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016447464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5957309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045635283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022665986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9750959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306750932","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.14460","title":"Book review: Open access in theory and practice: The theory-practice relationship and openness.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Publishing; Open science; Scholarly communication; Library science; Sociology; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Political science; Social science; Computer science; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.08324412778292907,"score_gpt":0.4223793383865874,"score_spread":0.33913521060365837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306750932","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071107503,0.41169006,0.00012907275,0.5148464,0.00012657419,0.000739501,0.000005026707,0.0000107260485,0.06534189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4491601,0.26751918,0.0020295249,0.2778437,0.0000938212,0.000056938872,0.000012684076,0.000014551753,0.003269483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871078,0.011668411,0.0005644581,0.000106303654,0.00042439482,0.00012864206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98851633,0.01000998,0.00084952335,0.0003507059,0.00016655403,0.000106907566],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.034862246,0.000076289514,0.00016145251,0.00014936985,0.0020767439,0.0069343816,0.0022641367,0.000043256547,0.00030669218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014004448,0.000056145203,0.000023444522,0.0006463645,0.00028458197,0.21149278,0.0014500786,0.0009894111,0.0000013694832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029882335,0.000054914006,0.009004236,0.00001963334,0.000016090502,0.0000031216823,0.04611972,0.0000032915407,0.000001486501,0.901895,0.030872876,0.011710806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034833964,0.00005740704,0.034290045,0.00014510305,0.000032696174,0.00009652239,0.04158718,0.0000067543574,5.8861144e-7,0.059483957,0.86387485,0.00007654559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008315491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000036844433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84241104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003633553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004209121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324260078","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.16114","title":"Brief Reviews of Books and Products: Open Update Podcast, Season Two","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Library science; World Wide Web; History","score_opus":0.12756249453027732,"score_gpt":0.303024233840851,"score_spread":0.17546173931057366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324260078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83308953,0.055377934,0.00004958013,0.0511536,0.00042749487,0.00089999364,0.00004832802,0.00009475853,0.058858797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768436,0.017516136,0.0028516871,0.00058547145,0.00021023225,0.00001102629,0.000059926126,0.000025642534,0.0018962873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974347,0.0011393436,0.0008586749,0.00015265119,0.0002570759,0.00015757006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971617,0.00028782056,0.000989916,0.00094226573,0.0004971901,0.000121149074],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005753072,0.00014785824,0.00043052863,0.00030308633,0.00057318644,0.006691046,0.0017512399,0.00006547075,0.000063492334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010789899,0.00012228769,0.00006475938,0.0002194895,0.00022634605,0.020379083,0.0007523937,0.0008908179,0.000007857246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031217476,0.00028137176,0.021842236,0.00026824645,0.00022275496,0.0000068772583,0.07405938,0.0000032349674,0.0018912916,0.6883218,0.07652744,0.13626319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013560985,0.00019800288,0.027345762,0.00054095115,0.00009018753,0.000039143157,0.002491717,0.00006436749,0.0001399233,0.025142722,0.94237256,0.0002185826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015922444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008124033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8658451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019589523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013851597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360825336","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.16113","title":"Brief Reviews of Books and Products: Engage in Public Scholarship! A Guidebook on Feminist and Accessible Communication","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Digital scholarship; Scholarly communication; Media studies; Sociology; Political science; Library science; Publishing; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.1823931263508581,"score_gpt":0.3015863969012314,"score_spread":0.11919327055037329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360825336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9041514,0.03612543,0.000007793087,0.021934956,0.000110285575,0.0005281913,0.000017399609,0.00006498988,0.037059586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97336125,0.024084166,0.0012169386,0.00054746715,0.00007020968,0.00002178139,0.0000401489,0.000026161673,0.00063188205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956509,0.002352113,0.001234279,0.00021116094,0.00033822205,0.0002133251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961183,0.000999249,0.0010810037,0.0012326929,0.00042344953,0.00014531332],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01003212,0.00020341358,0.0004960704,0.0008301609,0.0007837706,0.005506947,0.0013058872,0.0001434875,0.000025867897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037436087,0.0001778152,0.000060365484,0.00034304816,0.00042596663,0.014462823,0.0005153907,0.0018623961,0.0000034242753],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002936695,0.0004726976,0.1053221,0.00046610678,0.00013567225,0.0000067401156,0.114675134,0.0000016866612,0.0019413957,0.6662921,0.009174867,0.10121788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002834585,0.00058235787,0.25001904,0.0025357977,0.00009817078,0.00006478108,0.01128574,0.00010635444,0.0003015077,0.052705113,0.67891085,0.00055567507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009206845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001726767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66973597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004297518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015707982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365505877","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.16059","title":"Brief Reviews of Books and Products: Copyright's Broken Promise: How to Restore the Law's Ability to Promote the Progress of Science","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Health and Medical Research Impacts","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Copyright law; Political science; Law; Engineering ethics; Law and economics; Intellectual property; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.18207913369812448,"score_gpt":0.40750337349519145,"score_spread":0.22542423979706697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365505877","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69885874,0.004996292,0.000011002832,0.29430133,0.000034197063,0.0014642352,0.000003376844,0.0000066058037,0.000324245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921477,0.0026844281,0.00301657,0.0018509084,0.00008104187,0.000027265194,0.0000016645137,0.000008807222,0.00018164012],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747336,0.000634304,0.00058021693,0.00014713511,0.00085665274,0.0003083375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962938,0.00039296705,0.0003739074,0.00096462504,0.0008044955,0.0011702273],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017474439,0.00009050194,0.0003482667,0.0001723273,0.00030618388,0.00028980963,0.0007669673,0.000057573125,0.0000041385783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040068254,0.000043463588,0.000039166203,0.0010566611,0.0011773392,0.0014084822,0.00027666468,0.00078588456,9.611961e-7],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034079242,0.0007097213,0.06341278,0.0049145385,0.00011146359,0.000023595043,0.08233772,9.073701e-7,0.11376188,0.016323766,0.07012695,0.64486873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015195743,0.002886907,0.52469915,0.0032608614,0.00008349328,0.00010916148,0.0014461477,0.00004308182,0.010933866,0.001434803,0.45345995,0.00012298717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003194454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000073635365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64474577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045573688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017300347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96801764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365505878","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.16111","title":"Brief Reviews of Books and Products: A History of Scientific Journals: Publishing at the Royal Society, 1665-2015","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scientific publishing; Library science; Classics; History; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.14313883910016834,"score_gpt":0.274895346428191,"score_spread":0.1317565073280227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365505878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6233374,0.30168322,0.000026862712,0.041700527,0.0010286241,0.0004357262,0.00003443,0.000049598762,0.031703606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9641723,0.013025937,0.00090729026,0.00038441463,0.0002954132,0.000008705974,0.000046472116,0.000028951688,0.02113054],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99664354,0.0012677205,0.0011779767,0.00015985253,0.00057314883,0.00017774744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951186,0.0006593688,0.001905545,0.0010699253,0.0011379028,0.000108665976],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014732218,0.00014633917,0.00041547633,0.0003329784,0.00084202655,0.006616548,0.0015469879,0.000107926106,0.00014558573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028956954,0.00010301084,0.00015120245,0.00025122956,0.00093465997,0.01740651,0.000630385,0.0013274859,0.0000027824922],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008558541,0.00012761288,0.0068339193,0.00023515159,0.00016009896,0.0000010314096,0.16171251,0.0000042970555,0.0023351824,0.025176348,0.7860743,0.017253961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056361756,0.00011259184,0.0138774635,0.0005278613,0.00009757721,0.000019326946,0.004500776,0.00012872525,0.0000832252,0.0047072684,0.975246,0.00013554102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001314362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009540699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3408349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012518938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040142902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392638944","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.17765","title":"Brief Reviews of Books and Products: Algorithms of Resistance: The Everyday Fight against Platform Power","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Digital Media and Philosophy","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Resistance (ecology); Power (physics); Computer science; Algorithm; Biology; Physics","score_opus":0.04159617545645928,"score_gpt":0.2518419648612273,"score_spread":0.210245789404768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392638944","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16713957,0.66959643,0.011345359,0.082256176,0.0013353651,0.0010053371,0.00003663956,0.00006879593,0.06721631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97625667,0.010824405,0.012094918,0.00047436135,0.00007249156,0.0000030413587,0.0000024410172,0.00000869173,0.00026298902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986893,0.0002023557,0.0006324621,0.00011838134,0.00027154162,0.00008597377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982949,0.0003762857,0.00041370947,0.00067109615,0.00017716727,0.00006684252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016718303,0.00009820273,0.00025640253,0.00013228749,0.000087845365,0.0009168443,0.0010218829,0.000057721394,0.0000021683693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003365811,0.00006107696,0.0000685258,0.00035272294,0.00012350704,0.0075938366,0.00020901934,0.00047221367,6.7015566e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013622796,0.0002187038,0.0020122086,0.0009402234,0.0002523943,0.00002415309,0.0327734,0.0000017443167,0.00415956,0.58492625,0.019451868,0.35510328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093263225,0.0006014633,0.01803776,0.0042247106,0.00009177777,0.00014824247,0.00037943322,0.00039417378,0.0051744427,0.23531486,0.73433,0.00037052046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000012935461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.1714294e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8091171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011362208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001356405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88411504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395070851","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.16820","title":"Barriers and Opportunities in the Discoverability and Indexing of Student-Led Academic Journals","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Council of University Libraries; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.17174889355663367,"score_gpt":0.38301642202336045,"score_spread":0.21126752846672678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395070851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94238245,0.02985083,0.000044750886,0.02398502,0.000059622562,0.00011163556,0.0000019906245,0.0000048236107,0.003558855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756778,0.023753773,0.00010877674,0.00032334664,0.000056755434,0.0000014966637,3.388817e-7,0.000005253006,0.00007249167],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970118,0.0019623348,0.00048063777,0.000073397714,0.00036395664,0.00010791975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99816203,0.0012992386,0.0001902185,0.00015127925,0.00009624408,0.00010098774],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0085419165,0.00006972825,0.00017123033,0.00018277696,0.00037357374,0.001586842,0.00052782556,0.00011531575,0.000028573008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011359082,0.00004545625,0.000033555545,0.00019333026,0.00047272045,0.006163345,0.00011333018,0.0012357464,1.3336312e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107219814,0.00003485494,0.2663423,0.00007752851,0.000087262,0.000012582046,0.52760386,0.0000027884846,0.0007630925,0.17348696,0.00036031535,0.03112123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009726211,0.0003566995,0.49012756,0.0019567101,0.00013768293,0.00013116928,0.33173814,0.00019213505,0.00014878984,0.14692804,0.027012521,0.0002979178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010694706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007367349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22378528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033462824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030807086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399450667","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.17681","title":"Reusing Figures in Research: New License Clauses Eliminate Need for Permissions or Payments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"License; Reuse; Payment; Computer science; MIT License; Business; World Wide Web; Operating system; Waste management; Engineering","score_opus":0.8389947402438991,"score_gpt":0.6330120821596878,"score_spread":0.20598265808421123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399450667","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72845685,0.031528413,0.0005305219,0.2344515,0.00024195825,0.0007977639,0.000009264809,0.000042411873,0.003941327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9519314,0.020600684,0.018246947,0.0006972814,0.00028585826,0.00000962272,0.0000090817375,0.000035638914,0.008183457],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970908,0.0008237949,0.0007978063,0.0001816659,0.00083628396,0.00026965336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9780208,0.020067714,0.0001412289,0.0006427005,0.00071565545,0.00041189743],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013009935,0.00010171931,0.00028715498,0.0007326159,0.0002677334,0.0013309751,0.00058319187,0.00035481557,0.00007608423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038885485,0.00007080845,0.000100697245,0.00070184976,0.0001712079,0.0026221576,0.00025802085,0.0052321716,0.000005262456],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.022707073,0.0022418308,0.110890836,0.0052941036,0.0009663548,0.0012247406,0.0664796,0.000022798193,0.06564923,0.23203787,0.13382824,0.35865733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008958356,0.005097821,0.19545062,0.034673393,0.00028740198,0.0005773114,0.013265977,0.0017384827,0.0032493088,0.54173195,0.1945073,0.00046206624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000049874303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000660651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35819528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011301899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022311255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401023374","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.17755","title":"Staffing of Library Publishing Programs in the United States and Canada: A Data-Driven Analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.13235331893708813,"score_gpt":0.29683597948620666,"score_spread":0.16448266054911853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401023374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95129865,0.005845885,0.00012872434,0.040107362,0.000043227206,0.00013223021,0.000016776357,0.000014591962,0.002412577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947677,0.0033592628,0.0013145045,0.00035350872,0.00004225317,0.0000011883446,0.00010284495,0.000007002275,0.000051725485],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752706,0.0014400842,0.0004121336,0.0000982076,0.00039858127,0.00012391552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980673,0.0011981459,0.00019023394,0.00036887065,0.00010728756,0.00006812732],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032283186,0.000065393724,0.00017052868,0.0004132213,0.00026093214,0.006326642,0.0014674221,0.000069195274,0.000018823655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008555863,0.000043583168,0.000030173715,0.0016945471,0.00016724411,0.017574687,0.00024833935,0.00077544106,8.894838e-8],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015457408,0.0002080711,0.37224075,0.0001535957,0.0012015282,0.000065271706,0.43088725,0.00028535712,0.000048987615,0.11730456,0.01812497,0.059325073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088651106,0.0003498892,0.1354683,0.0014398786,0.0010826642,0.000040730345,0.2778015,0.039152753,0.000037587164,0.020730793,0.52248484,0.00052451453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3212378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4025346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5043599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003700965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089738163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404886431","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.18208","title":"Access for Whom? An Examination of Public-Facing Accessibility Practices in Library Accessibility Alliance Members’ Open Access Institutional Repositories","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Council of University Libraries","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.3472772325642557,"score_gpt":0.4658654650513983,"score_spread":0.11858823248714262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404886431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9632183,0.0035514242,0.0009452597,0.009685052,0.00044437547,0.0007597086,0.000015365069,0.000043264652,0.021337295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933856,0.001371591,0.0045884126,0.00014364421,0.00022798228,0.000033249715,0.000027947784,0.000017366749,0.00020421033],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99483275,0.0029628666,0.001087729,0.00034011522,0.00055013376,0.00022642207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952504,0.0020462899,0.0013159494,0.0005706977,0.0006449378,0.00017171103],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011221035,0.00015007709,0.00034346367,0.00030772015,0.00097376574,0.035397384,0.005213869,0.0002330113,0.00011693664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007993545,0.00012825397,0.0000775917,0.0011481303,0.0005284049,0.2511347,0.0011925356,0.00082056277,4.2586356e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009061443,0.0010018323,0.5245562,0.0007395067,0.00019160028,0.000014451716,0.08476806,0.000047706122,0.0015415775,0.2629435,0.00085758616,0.122431785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009252586,0.00025077868,0.8944477,0.0010996851,0.00007331137,0.0000150867,0.0074395933,0.0013180745,0.0032915007,0.061692603,0.029084232,0.00036217333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00085077505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014191834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36989146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018203809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025667655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9688752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406049334","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.18265","title":"Implementation of Transformative Agreements at the University of Chicago Library: A Case Study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.04327643186052887,"score_gpt":0.3161057796512928,"score_spread":0.2728293477907639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406049334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9812443,0.00062207656,0.00020458369,0.004966935,0.000034081368,0.0003737184,0.0000061613355,0.0000047086573,0.012543409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985041,0.00061799976,0.0003197398,0.00007702278,0.000008126363,6.2035883e-7,0.0000016892385,0.0000028827521,0.00046782882],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978826,0.0014246312,0.00034851712,0.000049341314,0.0002222663,0.000072640614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998853,0.00036673382,0.00037223272,0.0002084098,0.00016262692,0.000036960977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014103634,0.00005271541,0.00014347422,0.00011695884,0.0007073162,0.000142531,0.00053221284,0.000047744856,0.00023658812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008221588,0.000039367194,0.00005562495,0.00035988574,0.00025343022,0.004020411,0.0001308788,0.00027694317,7.0915837e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038621837,0.0003280156,0.15844586,0.000034138204,0.0003463597,0.000020403582,0.7817898,0.0000041469602,0.0004055627,0.019263607,0.00240824,0.03656764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019706353,0.00048462098,0.06112529,0.00012634865,0.00019264106,0.00002620315,0.91261494,0.000018174733,0.001535113,0.0030531406,0.018764377,0.000088496425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021070251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003091991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13082516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039732997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002946562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5440176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414769236","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.19779","title":"Evaluating Multilingual Metadata Quality in Crossref","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; Multilingualism; Categorization; Publishing; Sample (material); Quality (philosophy)","score_opus":0.25795847883341033,"score_gpt":0.48460896327261066,"score_spread":0.22665048443920033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414769236","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95819336,0.004396765,0.0004450639,0.00928561,0.00015109751,0.00014855622,0.000001583004,0.000013858182,0.027364084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897357,0.0005385016,0.007874686,0.0004878543,0.000049454105,0.0000018528835,0.0000019029151,0.0000049224986,0.0013050735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99575037,0.0029558784,0.00067335786,0.00010172897,0.00036408968,0.00015459959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997548,0.0013799213,0.00031372817,0.00035592707,0.00033666546,0.00006575122],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011944028,0.00007327581,0.00021163483,0.00021986695,0.00056006643,0.0019014945,0.000890421,0.00012803057,0.000041541978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010606051,0.00006360748,0.000054077795,0.00045457593,0.00022155151,0.008162004,0.0001702513,0.0008648031,0.0000019183904],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006629268,0.00040335464,0.16376677,0.000060749495,0.00015159238,0.0000068826257,0.13749795,0.000051286595,0.0060588573,0.4856084,0.0009027087,0.20482855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005965448,0.00041950116,0.6090185,0.0014653462,0.00017352607,0.000013597922,0.06474032,0.00096410076,0.003894662,0.20574482,0.106889166,0.0007110268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011555782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001114192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44525173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000095137104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007087184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414785156","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.20261","title":"From Course Packs to AI: Evolving Author and Publisher Rights in Journal Publishing Agreements","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Library Science and Information Systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Order (exchange); Inclusion (mineral); Permission; Electronic publishing","score_opus":0.025886900498134118,"score_gpt":0.2788984986787589,"score_spread":0.25301159818062474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414785156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70458287,0.0048561646,0.095456675,0.17646974,0.0018588926,0.00031471543,0.000004174398,0.000044756547,0.01641203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97265095,0.000060614737,0.023600152,0.0032596276,0.00009555657,0.0000019866438,0.0000027039457,0.0000030599965,0.00032538],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977646,0.0005078609,0.00089980476,0.00014744661,0.00048402054,0.00019630682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980491,0.00027501822,0.00051377795,0.0005352476,0.00036545825,0.00026138983],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034263954,0.00011808158,0.00023529652,0.00074213406,0.00041931594,0.03658167,0.0023973938,0.00012513666,0.0000140855645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048119607,0.000093867966,0.000044643217,0.0009749234,0.00004185116,0.18348172,0.0005902017,0.0010433147,0.0000027553833],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000643868,0.00018086727,0.54956436,0.00002732149,0.00012983207,0.000026622887,0.06761306,0.000042610784,0.00043995306,0.09337361,0.21997021,0.06856718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018477587,0.00015371757,0.7606726,0.0010200617,0.000012805545,0.00010386817,0.0043503237,0.0043300646,0.00011682263,0.15468778,0.07242578,0.00027839275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010626349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017460012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26806808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052002528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035837368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9644185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7108631754","doi":"10.31274/jlsc.20194","title":"Publications Produced and Services Offered by Library Publishing Programs in the United States and Canada: A Data-Driven Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Staffing; Publishing; Service (business); Table (database); Order (exchange); Focus (optics)","score_opus":0.11000385768366996,"score_gpt":0.33369865505929525,"score_spread":0.22369479737562528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7108631754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73307145,0.019325905,0.00021265716,0.24621904,0.00008442899,0.00038837976,0.00018146046,0.000013639269,0.00050304376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788486,0.0135449255,0.001199336,0.004592778,0.000049872855,0.000012536787,0.0013744402,0.000014335864,0.0003632209],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99143815,0.0040997937,0.0020929875,0.0006576496,0.0013472799,0.00036415138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99019104,0.004466156,0.0019168576,0.0023953717,0.0007034099,0.00032718354],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013386956,0.00030083043,0.0007205309,0.0021338088,0.0010534901,0.09676865,0.012229824,0.00035675854,0.000018050609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004771802,0.00020678085,0.00006269177,0.008777972,0.00033280012,0.1169445,0.0030409417,0.003124426,1.568237e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008403161,0.0001435803,0.91500306,0.000049451715,0.00047626553,0.0000025791835,0.008148943,0.000024395056,0.0000084547655,0.0026563832,0.04145041,0.031952444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012048064,0.00007049566,0.7867856,0.0005107943,0.00080591626,0.000028718734,0.046512395,0.02351917,0.000008184042,0.010336593,0.12990202,0.00031532993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14242809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.107416555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2457771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006352636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020022104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991754},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"}]}