{"meta":{"query_hash":"f08ecee831c6","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Library Metadata"},"cohort_total":6,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"exported":6,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/f08ecee831c6","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Library+Metadata"},"results":[{"id":"W2789253917","doi":"10.1080/19386389.2018.1443698","title":"Open Metadata for Research Data Discovery in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Library Metadata","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of British Columbia; York University; Ontario Council of University Libraries; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; Data discovery; Computer science; Data science; Reuse; Data management plan; Data curation; Research data; World Wide Web; Open data; Best practice; Open research; Data element; Linked data; Metadata repository; Data management; Database; Semantic Web; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.6762589410535437,"score_gpt":0.5244379087475245,"score_spread":0.15182103230601918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789253917","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051133785,0.023900324,0.16316421,0.2666649,0.0029837794,0.0024379806,0.043772284,0.011026348,0.43491647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33994904,0.025632469,0.42849767,0.016870845,0.0007384182,0.0014756271,0.035138175,0.0028622246,0.14883551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9641814,0.005890227,0.0038498107,0.0025468736,0.0200913,0.0034403573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85580033,0.024918474,0.005707786,0.024602028,0.076617554,0.012353835],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036536362,0.00046342894,0.00093048014,0.019560525,0.019919008,0.02408293,0.0051782313,0.002434655,0.010612939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.091190614,0.0013723903,0.0013215295,0.0475141,0.009545031,0.01602869,0.018006891,0.0037416203,0.0025537969],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017262413,0.00009032377,0.01231159,0.0007285343,0.000071072966,0.00041034963,0.008889503,0.0025798737,0.001328244,0.50005895,0.18535917,0.28799972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033761815,0.000018191224,0.007107311,0.0010516945,0.000041512296,0.0001105739,0.0051424266,0.0027580897,0.0016094692,0.057210993,0.92475593,0.00015993639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9845094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9839843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9948218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20233276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5296256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9251809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792963435","doi":"10.1080/19386389.2018.1440922","title":"Disciplinary Metadata in Libraries: A Case Study Applying the ISO 19115-North American Profile (NAP) for Describing Historical Topographic Maps","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Library Metadata","topic":"Geographic Information Systems Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Council of University Libraries","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; Computer science; World Wide Web; Georeference; Geographic information system; Transformative learning; Digital library; Data science; Library science; Geography; Cartography; Sociology","score_opus":0.1410108094743861,"score_gpt":0.3408181410261293,"score_spread":0.19980733155174318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792963435","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89761317,0.001742535,0.008827842,0.011604173,0.00012426224,0.00040527288,0.000522184,0.0002937176,0.07886688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97132754,0.0019673863,0.00837311,0.00093012815,0.00005905681,0.0001263622,0.00021644252,0.00012609026,0.016873948],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903398,0.0055479007,0.00057626265,0.00034912472,0.0024138372,0.00077309436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836945,0.0090661375,0.0013318837,0.0014051727,0.0030193953,0.0014829937],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006522333,0.00034973622,0.00039508656,0.0040142317,0.01954082,0.0086866105,0.0028196375,0.0028590574,0.004216509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030623065,0.00035860427,0.00046819192,0.01398235,0.006080948,0.0073458473,0.008122661,0.0017521449,0.0009993084],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011055558,0.00048445357,0.032339748,0.00057683396,0.000026468737,0.020135064,0.8106243,0.0011614729,0.0012992641,0.028472172,0.00995218,0.09481742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012300032,0.00011338678,0.011129203,0.00038498212,0.00004110186,0.004367962,0.78877175,0.0010488088,0.0016665794,0.004235937,0.18816473,0.00006332816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26066574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48736364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9913134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021629533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014230276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.518297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014021059","doi":"10.1080/19386389.2020.1742434","title":"Exploring Methods for Linked Data Model Evaluation in Practice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Library Metadata","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Ontology; Documentation; Context (archaeology); Metadata; Data science; Process (computing); Variety (cybernetics); Ambiguity; Linked data; Knowledge management; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Semantic Web","score_opus":0.6985449576336179,"score_gpt":0.4703366936463967,"score_spread":0.22820826398722122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014021059","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005995676,0.0008805663,0.97793144,0.0034408772,0.000091278656,0.0018338993,0.00012614991,0.0006073761,0.009092713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05830274,0.00030578434,0.93711257,0.00022658482,0.000038104885,0.0030743305,0.00015010902,0.00022418585,0.0005656563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.40523207,0.525724,0.019993013,0.012549576,0.033933416,0.0025678978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.23715083,0.65926254,0.015173277,0.044861022,0.04065834,0.002893981],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.4431752,0.0039932206,0.0035403278,0.019123616,0.0067210854,0.030488873,0.01090474,0.0075515388,0.01397763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6036922,0.0035983026,0.003816129,0.014154475,0.020777076,0.036053844,0.022894075,0.008757922,0.00234055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004507606,0.0010905042,0.007610693,0.00458733,0.00059795514,0.00046370015,0.048108608,0.017939417,0.0014437942,0.54924786,0.0051769638,0.36328244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046285614,0.0005840173,0.0016159627,0.0053357785,0.00022576402,0.00035445928,0.026556056,0.122049525,0.0029500185,0.78912467,0.050474897,0.000266015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008420069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009307937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4431752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01844386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025504867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68666416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280609400","doi":"10.1080/19386389.2022.2051979","title":"Numismatics & Bibliographic Description: How Rutgers University Libraries Described Coins with MODS","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Library Metadata","topic":"Digital and Traditional Archives Management","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; Computer science; World Wide Web; Metadata repository; Interoperability; Resource Description and Access; Realia; Special collections; Cataloging; Meta Data Services; Controlled vocabulary; Library science","score_opus":0.06207260552185907,"score_gpt":0.17380018359080032,"score_spread":0.11172757806894125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280609400","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.088845626,0.004770917,0.078738876,0.07281005,0.001597958,0.00032997716,0.0012514832,0.0026952585,0.7489598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7309438,0.0045663225,0.06856005,0.0070945485,0.00036601876,0.00023151758,0.0011407383,0.002259416,0.18483755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9828007,0.010435402,0.0010356568,0.00091968605,0.004148696,0.00065980316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98877746,0.0046297032,0.0012498237,0.002546802,0.0022204567,0.00057576416],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0094708055,0.00038073093,0.00038987322,0.009301331,0.009870493,0.02684453,0.0024337429,0.0018586305,0.011459335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02968041,0.00064939394,0.0004919218,0.014670167,0.014451459,0.028844727,0.010914593,0.0027191213,0.0033863522],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041649102,0.000041994976,0.0066143908,0.00025247657,0.0000197044,0.00072889595,0.1759426,0.000574302,0.00070931343,0.6081551,0.070338264,0.1365813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005622704,0.000012156211,0.0023373573,0.00044892833,0.000016009819,0.00056431495,0.07912062,0.00081376213,0.00080735196,0.030378696,0.8854125,0.000082711194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08540837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14822707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9731555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017137727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013650183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16982245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386207778","doi":"10.1080/19386389.2023.2251857","title":"From Uncontrolled Keywords to FAST? Attempting Metadata Reconciliation for a Canadian Research Data Aggregator","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Library Metadata","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; Discoverability; Computer science; World Wide Web; Workflow; Subject (documents); Metadata repository; News aggregator; Service (business); Brainstorming; Information retrieval; Database","score_opus":0.43949568080974266,"score_gpt":0.4561766238239289,"score_spread":0.01668094301418621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386207778","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31924668,0.0021603645,0.5424919,0.06507403,0.0011235353,0.0020974807,0.0025852297,0.012231044,0.0529897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34148648,0.0008013165,0.6335851,0.0038377692,0.0001305033,0.00047793565,0.0019108403,0.0020598508,0.015710201],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95582384,0.016018169,0.004216031,0.0047489214,0.016016884,0.0031762691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88251185,0.025579691,0.006221693,0.035234515,0.047103047,0.0033491415],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07003118,0.00075531675,0.0011169682,0.008065402,0.015039859,0.015261681,0.00439567,0.0026355928,0.0022098287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1238203,0.0011008742,0.0012000701,0.015291722,0.008072901,0.014062887,0.010734757,0.0035046274,0.0012831533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005023736,0.00020144842,0.030677686,0.00069749996,0.0001577617,0.0023080553,0.116746746,0.0066689723,0.022441877,0.12378017,0.041904166,0.6539132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104217754,0.0002630808,0.012847722,0.0007394855,0.0002584738,0.001853367,0.09656644,0.031556,0.06483373,0.065527655,0.724772,0.0006779073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45319802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5170751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9847383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027129253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.090342164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90112025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413413541","doi":"10.1080/19386389.2025.2547151","title":"Inching Forward in the Face of Hegemonic Factors: Examining Metadata Contradictions Across University Indigenous Collections","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Library Metadata","topic":"Digital and Traditional Archives Management","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; Indigenous; Hegemony; Face (sociological concept); Computer science; World Wide Web; Library science; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Social science; Ecology; Law","score_opus":0.049892938755534286,"score_gpt":0.23445464128202786,"score_spread":0.18456170252649357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413413541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94772106,0.0011009078,0.002193084,0.007493916,0.000044422002,0.00009686339,0.00006645727,0.0000254972,0.041257836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99621814,0.00033099923,0.0010351615,0.0005176773,0.000011218797,0.0000405506,0.000026319623,0.000026153833,0.0017938969],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97280204,0.01294718,0.0012935584,0.0016446934,0.007932447,0.0033800595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.960619,0.021901555,0.005105556,0.002664424,0.007341995,0.0023675521],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035344608,0.00038027714,0.000786325,0.009559566,0.04314244,0.024526361,0.0032456424,0.0021341527,0.0030528812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052103426,0.00083595683,0.00047181282,0.013941997,0.052935775,0.016069932,0.017596515,0.005014303,0.00026369852],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025760475,0.000017031149,0.007732537,0.000056749715,0.000012000865,0.0002210401,0.95641905,0.00006462702,0.00023560716,0.02876566,0.00042100734,0.0060288147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023817458,0.000009206163,0.0044235857,0.000097535936,0.00001352203,0.000038653303,0.98449546,0.00009362655,0.00017675007,0.0034893155,0.007143872,0.000016115246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42714646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57100594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97547364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07825973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06007935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8493204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}