{"meta":{"query_hash":"f08ecee831c6","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Library Metadata"},"cohort_total":6,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"exported":6,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/f08ecee831c6","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Library+Metadata"},"results":[{"id":"W2789253917","doi":"10.1080/19386389.2018.1443698","title":"Open Metadata for Research Data Discovery in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Library Metadata","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of British Columbia; York University; Ontario Council of University Libraries; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; Data discovery; Computer science; Data science; Reuse; Data management plan; Data curation; Research data; World Wide Web; Open data; Best practice; Open research; Data element; Linked data; Metadata repository; Data management; Database; Semantic Web; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.6762589410535437,"score_gpt":0.5244379087475245,"score_spread":0.15182103230601918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789253917","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014871992,0.0056562144,0.6375987,0.30729282,0.0040932084,0.0041072317,0.007411054,0.000032072454,0.01893674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23524931,0.012744145,0.6842716,0.002144723,0.0013743596,0.00006478711,0.0014255389,0.00012401938,0.06260154],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99544936,0.0007692177,0.000796102,0.0007397425,0.0016167888,0.0006287892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858527,0.0018606717,0.0010048185,0.010891381,0.00013153687,0.00025887848],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014004307,0.00015396104,0.0004716971,0.00043311118,0.0004669631,0.0689137,0.098255046,0.000031009564,0.000019654992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007361839,0.00011922544,0.000043241707,0.00042841124,0.00009604825,0.7197832,0.066780396,0.0007081606,0.0000022198124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033150899,0.00020561871,0.008749963,0.000106775966,0.00038501105,0.0012945571,0.00001977496,0.000015992826,0.00010477862,0.26128834,0.70805186,0.0194458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001076303,0.000114215065,0.014863693,0.00010426973,0.0000251324,0.000037101458,0.00013658719,0.0027720833,0.00046149516,0.004698176,0.9755265,0.00018444072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3277601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.353491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6508695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001162816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007403214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792963435","doi":"10.1080/19386389.2018.1440922","title":"Disciplinary Metadata in Libraries: A Case Study Applying the ISO 19115-North American Profile (NAP) for Describing Historical Topographic Maps","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Library Metadata","topic":"Geographic Information Systems Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Council of University Libraries","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; Computer science; World Wide Web; Georeference; Geographic information system; Transformative learning; Digital library; Data science; Library science; Geography; Cartography; Sociology","score_opus":0.1410108094743861,"score_gpt":0.3408181410261293,"score_spread":0.19980733155174318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792963435","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9789425,0.0020046432,0.0012712752,0.010113516,0.0016369731,0.003729046,0.0002300039,0.00007140182,0.0020006397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99311125,0.00021924745,0.004356252,0.00012949787,0.0006162796,0.0002666388,0.00001724378,0.000027677002,0.0012559005],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99656594,0.0005464391,0.0012806545,0.00027943804,0.0008197951,0.00050771085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957718,0.00074351614,0.0021303904,0.0010196222,0.00013834563,0.00019631535],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031800224,0.000249637,0.00076214387,0.00054643775,0.003345546,0.0023006531,0.002307001,0.000052266387,0.000014030992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078645634,0.0001664184,0.00029846543,0.0009672535,0.0005971151,0.02197747,0.0009350718,0.00047914882,0.0000014852188],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026848933,0.00049096247,0.9062767,0.000082180435,0.0007591172,0.0013022893,0.05364114,0.000011228296,0.0000024260405,0.005911605,0.01729461,0.013959243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022556365,0.00092847116,0.1272331,0.00017550077,0.00055331056,0.0006584369,0.5200044,0.000083649655,0.00000735431,0.0019883416,0.3453901,0.0007216791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004648167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006705654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7790436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008229408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000384163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014021059","doi":"10.1080/19386389.2020.1742434","title":"Exploring Methods for Linked Data Model Evaluation in Practice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Library Metadata","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Ontology; Documentation; Context (archaeology); Metadata; Data science; Process (computing); Variety (cybernetics); Ambiguity; Linked data; Knowledge management; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Semantic Web","score_opus":0.6985449576336179,"score_gpt":0.4703366936463967,"score_spread":0.22820826398722122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014021059","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012902278,0.001866005,0.96366185,0.03237837,0.00034935333,0.00016631185,0.00000883921,0.00002776054,0.00025128163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01104809,0.00040832305,0.9864987,0.001776407,0.00022268931,0.000005920014,0.000015399019,0.000008788544,0.00001569244],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982459,0.00046754561,0.0005438426,0.00026556035,0.0003288384,0.00014832102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746674,0.0011861378,0.00042241433,0.0007355356,0.00009629187,0.00009284979],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003549207,0.00009217011,0.0002755574,0.00012452953,0.000031467374,0.00032706856,0.002864429,0.00002620159,0.000004060344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042986837,0.00007329573,0.000052962525,0.00036729223,0.000012041994,0.04460934,0.000952678,0.0002101379,0.0000011699115],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047845236,0.00022930595,0.00025477077,0.00010540394,0.00031877944,0.000082222614,0.0032896998,0.014698701,0.0034426274,0.043999534,0.017936736,0.91516376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061430264,0.00007991871,0.00019867628,0.00002399121,0.00008793886,0.00002800394,0.00019548167,0.95716524,0.0012412865,0.0049787858,0.03529997,0.0000863865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000016345116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.506401e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94246656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009827298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038515992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9687532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280609400","doi":"10.1080/19386389.2022.2051979","title":"Numismatics & Bibliographic Description: How Rutgers University Libraries Described Coins with MODS","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Library Metadata","topic":"Digital and Traditional Archives Management","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; Computer science; World Wide Web; Metadata repository; Interoperability; Resource Description and Access; Realia; Special collections; Cataloging; Meta Data Services; Controlled vocabulary; Library science","score_opus":0.06207260552185907,"score_gpt":0.17380018359080032,"score_spread":0.11172757806894125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280609400","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16988632,0.000944241,0.009726173,0.028959421,0.0017421948,0.00050847424,0.0032428412,0.00025101795,0.7847393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9505014,0.00020731549,0.0061274795,0.00068629737,0.00031655474,0.0000016900442,0.0003329408,0.000028871777,0.041797455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988805,0.000120605895,0.00022026885,0.00012962385,0.00048471274,0.0001643096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992603,0.000079614925,0.0003062468,0.00020045749,0.00003275476,0.000120602366],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011807903,0.00014201594,0.00022899103,0.0013018224,0.00050608953,0.0013309952,0.0006142078,0.0000068170352,0.0012566448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000044212898,0.0001114619,0.00016126265,0.0005705776,0.00027807322,0.0129827205,0.0002901532,0.00025084495,0.0000039691854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046018648,0.0004207202,0.0006087935,0.00006757648,0.0007045512,0.00032555574,0.0022084839,0.00025310914,0.00001647361,0.7274343,0.2668565,0.0006437871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053945614,0.000386318,0.00097026664,0.00003485288,0.0001547782,0.00009373457,0.0023159108,0.000047930844,0.00002244914,0.031454172,0.9637904,0.00018969338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000049017704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014331648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7806151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010925526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010521786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386207778","doi":"10.1080/19386389.2023.2251857","title":"From Uncontrolled Keywords to FAST? Attempting Metadata Reconciliation for a Canadian Research Data Aggregator","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Library Metadata","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; Discoverability; Computer science; World Wide Web; Workflow; Subject (documents); Metadata repository; News aggregator; Service (business); Brainstorming; Information retrieval; Database","score_opus":0.43949568080974266,"score_gpt":0.4561766238239289,"score_spread":0.01668094301418621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386207778","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01689518,0.0056274915,0.5879551,0.36800906,0.0037270978,0.003525503,0.012324002,0.00030230047,0.0016342608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021427624,0.008637944,0.89108384,0.008814497,0.006653739,0.00018325305,0.010112853,0.00023721304,0.052849017],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994114,0.0011918524,0.0010238239,0.00093912205,0.0017890185,0.0009422305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989439,0.0039795437,0.00062400394,0.004638733,0.0003667993,0.0009519038],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015690716,0.00021238878,0.0005398961,0.0021830054,0.00042782808,0.012984776,0.017431436,0.00007848187,0.000082531566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01242698,0.00018117085,0.000108120745,0.0033923888,0.000043062766,0.23456715,0.0067206593,0.00064100977,0.00010367666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020538332,0.000041885418,0.00041181527,0.00003982207,0.0005823343,0.00031973087,0.00017571777,0.000070622846,0.00034892,0.006763101,0.9443644,0.046676245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009889754,0.00019668296,0.00078629656,0.00010779658,0.00005691904,0.000009723741,0.000345276,0.018001659,0.00026937376,0.0017967798,0.97724247,0.00019806309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008351291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005705931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35919455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011994424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022811184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413413541","doi":"10.1080/19386389.2025.2547151","title":"Inching Forward in the Face of Hegemonic Factors: Examining Metadata Contradictions Across University Indigenous Collections","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Library Metadata","topic":"Digital and Traditional Archives Management","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; Indigenous; Hegemony; Face (sociological concept); Computer science; World Wide Web; Library science; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Social science; Ecology; Law","score_opus":0.049892938755534286,"score_gpt":0.23445464128202786,"score_spread":0.18456170252649357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413413541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86972326,0.00041123884,0.0028648793,0.0013397719,0.00055008725,0.00030571406,0.0020496107,0.000023908615,0.12273154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830208,0.00012327652,0.00016192644,0.00015880805,0.00007268376,7.431015e-7,0.00008544194,0.0000060942966,0.016370246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898255,0.0001422976,0.00039878898,0.00010880146,0.00020892089,0.00015861556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989935,0.0004718806,0.00027036603,0.00020276303,0.000025655643,0.000035806002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028600046,0.00010789116,0.0002606598,0.0003576337,0.00046755304,0.00059878133,0.000710114,0.000012896869,0.00004770446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003342867,0.00007435497,0.00012754319,0.00030438075,0.00017363002,0.006639596,0.00017625446,0.0002504759,6.8492653e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020491224,0.0010501698,0.0041132635,0.00012657254,0.0017687195,0.0001194475,0.059146933,0.00038017193,0.000028564249,0.9112747,0.018016556,0.003770011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011579524,0.00036716758,0.07246229,0.00024128765,0.00037734702,0.000023852612,0.09991917,0.000054627733,0.00012021735,0.023594625,0.80146736,0.00021411575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010769072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013246419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88768005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020952823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013083179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5774062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}