{"meta":{"query_hash":"351841ffced6","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Literacy Research"},"cohort_total":34,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":34,"exported":34,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/351841ffced6","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Literacy+Research"},"results":[{"id":"W1882583343","doi":"10.1080/10862960701331944","title":"Letters, Imagined Communities, and Literate Identities: Perspectives from Rural Ugandan Women","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Reading (process); Sociocultural evolution; Ethnography; Sociology; Identity (music); Situated; Personhood; Gender studies; Meaning (existential); Pedagogy; Psychology; Anthropology; Aesthetics; Linguistics; Political science","score_opus":0.044854334569681076,"score_gpt":0.36064879857610455,"score_spread":0.31579446400642347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1882583343","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98419905,0.0015235104,0.00034673678,0.0056211962,0.00007108076,0.000034854947,0.000016213724,0.0000071973636,0.00818011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99359256,0.0013287807,0.0002477932,0.0014226298,0.000037744067,0.00006789606,0.000009264457,0.000008974505,0.0032843677],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936568,0.0048700213,0.00012556302,0.00026364898,0.00029406892,0.000789782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928639,0.004790784,0.0006816415,0.00016166134,0.00034828307,0.0011536961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049629016,0.00071726483,0.000817366,0.001926565,0.029483551,0.009754415,0.0014815433,0.003614531,0.0033551622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009230544,0.0008235105,0.00025284762,0.0015547645,0.020167353,0.007939113,0.010888176,0.0046904697,0.00037616282],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057854754,0.000012731462,0.0006108745,0.00002079628,6.283096e-7,0.0003570101,0.99687177,0.0000035692804,0.00006681449,0.0009083326,0.00014540668,0.0009963417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015610054,0.000017036486,0.000287689,0.000038978793,0.0000010362611,0.00016289514,0.9956149,0.0000085214715,0.00002521056,0.00025996583,0.0035787956,0.0000034712834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010331536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015531116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029483551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033040424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029634077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026246667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978455512","doi":"10.1207/s15548430jlr3601_3","title":"Perspectives on Struggling English Language Learners: Case Studies of Two Chinese-Canadian Children","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Psychology; Viewpoints; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Preference","score_opus":0.052457601582164386,"score_gpt":0.461100238757123,"score_spread":0.40864263717495863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978455512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933535,0.00075890706,0.0002622184,0.0010009973,0.000022748418,0.00012974959,0.000077495424,0.0000087407125,0.0043856422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922131,0.0013914412,0.0012389806,0.0005272008,0.000010542281,0.00014182774,0.000068014466,0.000026342423,0.0043826024],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953027,0.0016117782,0.00021332572,0.00053778145,0.0008284918,0.0015059084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99667525,0.0012259979,0.00038063314,0.00012307224,0.00065714965,0.0009378307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038317698,0.001773064,0.0014675306,0.0026142234,0.036068015,0.00421529,0.0033309117,0.0033154483,0.0021745604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065442137,0.00095015863,0.00082665496,0.004025146,0.011449826,0.0020547837,0.006291485,0.0037110571,0.0003336097],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017382668,0.000038669026,0.0064133634,0.00010008178,0.0000058950036,0.009772574,0.97807056,0.000045615117,0.0005696626,0.000918848,0.00040988257,0.0036374622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002433866,0.000036820322,0.0041914983,0.00009412851,0.000015186458,0.002534452,0.98651683,0.00004728923,0.00029133676,0.00015745047,0.006087864,0.000024745468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73408985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90234774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26591015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031357087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032719072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5349523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994405758","doi":"10.1177/1086296x10397870","title":"Warning","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Interpretation (philosophy); Perspective (graphical); Consistency (knowledge bases); Metafiction; Pedagogy; Psychology; Mathematics education; Visual arts; Computer science; Literature; Art; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.42246186007763886,"score_gpt":0.4256817879968252,"score_spread":0.0032199279191863495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994405758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032819659,0.00083063473,0.00368444,0.0057578683,0.002267184,0.0001983938,0.0030950648,0.00182833,0.9790562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021989798,0.00087759417,0.0030037314,0.0035915587,0.0003772346,0.00015970324,0.0032430696,0.0007225398,0.9660348],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849474,0.00021164957,0.00009479341,0.00035552308,0.00063455617,0.00020874596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982141,0.00024335855,0.00011112181,0.00035923862,0.0007793164,0.00029284236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010604217,0.00066800584,0.00045806635,0.0016056639,0.002834556,0.0054701907,0.0016311123,0.0028709632,0.5797095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005152542,0.00034731106,0.00056635885,0.001357629,0.00095724565,0.004048754,0.0037526477,0.0019770043,0.36206678],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016979848,0.0000899243,0.0020371114,0.0003541926,0.0000121313215,0.000538763,0.0015869134,0.00014622195,0.0010845262,0.071136095,0.6798657,0.24297872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051490388,0.000012717478,0.00042639958,0.00007214788,0.0000022684837,0.00014213611,0.00024089718,0.000040587016,0.00016371784,0.0020147925,0.9968732,0.0000060699094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004162153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054131015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5797095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001549689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021789758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010143454","doi":"10.1207/s15548430jlr3401_4","title":"Teaching Decoding Skills to Poor Readers in High School","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Reading comprehension; Class (philosophy); Mathematics education; Test (biology); Reading (process); Control (management); Comprehension; Analysis of covariance; Word (group theory); Computer science; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07488036412231054,"score_gpt":0.44380721756244157,"score_spread":0.36892685344013104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010143454","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999703,0.000046330846,0.00004299914,0.000018957815,0.0000031500285,0.000020373182,0.000013176655,0.000006308291,0.00014574666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983241,0.00011049184,0.0007352082,0.00003496315,0.0000055611185,0.000031529627,0.000049229307,0.0000030385384,0.000705876],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940956,0.00013812711,0.00006976336,0.00010404539,0.000122039586,0.00015646122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970282,0.0007108975,0.00048823308,0.00020257986,0.00033149018,0.0012386831],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011481056,0.00054679665,0.00061578053,0.0009874584,0.0011494982,0.0007047102,0.00037418408,0.00061650545,0.0018790353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058269384,0.0005681152,0.00022184516,0.0004004477,0.00087305694,0.0004560285,0.00064918544,0.0006891438,0.00069666805],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041811634,0.015076264,0.76467544,0.00035325397,0.00008536347,0.001985901,0.016495945,0.00056148646,0.033412408,0.00019177022,0.0018507297,0.1611302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043823785,0.022171421,0.9522624,0.0000738684,0.00011423681,0.0013476243,0.0075860023,0.0008539935,0.011104401,0.0005608521,0.0034230477,0.000063950516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004102161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010851749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004102161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005051242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009193163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008156598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070973507","doi":"10.1080/10862960009548077","title":"Critical Issues: Researching Complexity","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Rubric; Reading (process); Sociology; Enlightenment; Epistemology; Critical theory; Pedagogy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.2903594119367914,"score_gpt":0.6031508746028263,"score_spread":0.31279146266603497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070973507","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046107493,0.07691495,0.11111221,0.52772695,0.0076551046,0.00035475905,0.00008432327,0.0001387257,0.22990553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86586034,0.033443592,0.036936007,0.036147438,0.0077607143,0.00075998047,0.00006664515,0.00019978671,0.018825566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9703461,0.022686785,0.00066324766,0.0021754708,0.0032595487,0.000868779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8132955,0.16687988,0.0061371555,0.0046246666,0.007001516,0.0020612294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03227599,0.0010451055,0.0010003181,0.0057876334,0.008522058,0.016142063,0.0022855024,0.0056662047,0.005248261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09003647,0.00051884766,0.00063141464,0.0030041928,0.08289234,0.03310368,0.0075251753,0.011558525,0.00060070644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012107494,0.000018081795,0.00045569838,0.00025515072,0.000012471948,0.00010054907,0.04405942,0.00017169869,0.000098637385,0.9391604,0.005556164,0.010099491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012782139,0.00002183914,0.00026649935,0.00075845397,0.000009966234,0.00011262629,0.024059765,0.00035000555,0.00024564326,0.89416414,0.07998354,0.00001468958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001294521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009860303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03227599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008589416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071644606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17069381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096343226","doi":"10.1207/s15548430jlr3402_6","title":"Creating Commonplaces for Interpretation: Literary Anthropology and Literacy Education Research","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Literacy; Sociology; Literary criticism; Literary science; Literacy education; Anthropology; Epistemology; Literature; Pedagogy; Linguistics; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.14824578707078592,"score_gpt":0.5530657375316138,"score_spread":0.40481995046082786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096343226","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24681005,0.11290273,0.12401853,0.1292124,0.004661964,0.00063470635,0.00015487452,0.0002619399,0.38134286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9313799,0.023698129,0.029150655,0.0037163196,0.0016312376,0.00082355016,0.000092272705,0.00021915884,0.009288788],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94188607,0.052073605,0.0010791903,0.0016596578,0.0023460782,0.00095540046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9275004,0.062230438,0.0030917162,0.0038349729,0.0019408376,0.0014016408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037843816,0.001201227,0.0015094135,0.017977605,0.018432159,0.03622485,0.002915183,0.0061150445,0.004350234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03980656,0.0010965833,0.0008314676,0.013005627,0.103001736,0.046625767,0.018204533,0.007247457,0.00058210746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021525108,0.0000650222,0.0009573198,0.0004012889,0.00001837018,0.0005994123,0.63143694,0.00009960733,0.00014534914,0.34053573,0.0020709783,0.023648497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002736125,0.00005182186,0.00090449554,0.0024458952,0.000019506131,0.0009272948,0.6222059,0.00042716807,0.0003148758,0.28469646,0.08793975,0.000039481365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020420572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003896634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037843816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068858997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005873997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20013958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106236178","doi":"10.1177/1086296x14534180","title":"From <i>Aquí</i> and <i>Allá</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Sight; Sociology; Literacy; Pedagogy; Curriculum; Class (philosophy); Reading (process); Identity (music); Mathematics education; Artifact (error); Psychology; Linguistics; Aesthetics; Computer science; Art","score_opus":0.07527939574674813,"score_gpt":0.3732582856172483,"score_spread":0.29797888987050014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106236178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.726281,0.0015102378,0.0039931946,0.011092762,0.0004987919,0.0000918359,0.000100472986,0.00008337833,0.2563484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804379,0.00053383235,0.001186625,0.0007250757,0.000089625246,0.00006117648,0.000042124848,0.00006091364,0.016862674],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993191,0.00034481546,0.000020410234,0.00009383704,0.000111141424,0.00011076769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988482,0.00058936724,0.00013161452,0.00008471342,0.00016494466,0.00018125479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011140046,0.00046821157,0.00029705281,0.0010079492,0.009199077,0.0050823535,0.0005687621,0.00101558,0.0049913432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002571317,0.00017523623,0.00023919648,0.00054332725,0.0092520015,0.0036000898,0.0041875755,0.002998738,0.00047904742],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042648422,0.000039381473,0.0020826682,0.00014243553,0.0000052679266,0.0009936336,0.9316482,0.000044841174,0.0020902604,0.04278222,0.0035630083,0.016565412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040617197,0.000046451307,0.0037727586,0.00024503353,0.000011775639,0.0009446052,0.7952042,0.00011431821,0.001884272,0.004434021,0.19331212,0.000026390235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008748787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017296601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009199077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002504292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015750118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138095014","doi":"10.1177/1086296x12457167","title":"Measuring Situated Literacy Activity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Family literacy; Literacy; Situated; Curriculum; Pedagogy; Information literacy; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Empirical research; Mathematics education; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.21593189639927202,"score_gpt":0.4836394933325129,"score_spread":0.26770759693324087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138095014","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93145394,0.0003056325,0.024770863,0.00017884227,0.000032163665,0.001055182,0.00064759067,0.0001196866,0.041436072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9619481,0.00027754012,0.033613663,0.000052155858,0.000008239043,0.0008335329,0.0004445852,0.000017763863,0.0028042751],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967615,0.0015051904,0.00029806874,0.0004193627,0.0007790087,0.00023684066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929865,0.003452695,0.0011105731,0.0005710942,0.0014159146,0.0004633166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025116366,0.00027355444,0.0002839689,0.0023730563,0.0008858484,0.0017529549,0.00057790254,0.00048392056,0.0031006327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012122283,0.0002010289,0.00036230276,0.0011356679,0.0006708934,0.0013288618,0.0021453642,0.00054885604,0.0004116454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030746445,0.0012359059,0.59677005,0.0012027047,0.00017790419,0.00033589336,0.054114778,0.001291864,0.009608424,0.008333944,0.0012736028,0.3253475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000906272,0.0016868735,0.8783028,0.0006009793,0.00019557543,0.00078424683,0.0590976,0.003927492,0.014709195,0.0072698873,0.033197936,0.00013678479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003085409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010596078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031006327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000920272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014051695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013282955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139313182","doi":"10.1207/s15548430jlr3501_3","title":"At Play on the Borders of the Diegetic: Story Boundaries and Narrative Interpretation","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Digital Storytelling and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Interpretation (philosophy); Variety (cybernetics); Notice; Visual arts; Aesthetics; Event (particle physics); Literature; Fictional universe; Phenomenon; Sociology; History; Media studies; Art; Linguistics; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09452934573702101,"score_gpt":0.5019507715516945,"score_spread":0.40742142581467355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139313182","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.928404,0.0031323128,0.0045979554,0.0034040809,0.0001226164,0.00007273835,0.000058535494,0.00006925019,0.0601385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959949,0.00058810087,0.00074449694,0.00017881102,0.000018815761,0.00003129261,0.000021468119,0.000029642026,0.0023926124],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960039,0.0027853358,0.00012928592,0.0003701856,0.00034959338,0.00036173893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933948,0.0042428453,0.00087218534,0.00032384144,0.00044421168,0.0007221096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056197564,0.0007480287,0.0006084632,0.0023279262,0.009292393,0.014664503,0.0015694661,0.0024519092,0.002215405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01187411,0.000712594,0.0003831389,0.0010440244,0.027531521,0.011623025,0.010263002,0.0039196983,0.00044105863],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011094868,0.00000650245,0.0013158775,0.000021229835,0.000001648171,0.00041478072,0.9915456,0.000007738216,0.00018299508,0.0049027894,0.00012646405,0.0014632788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033230547,0.000026077349,0.0031288865,0.00017028001,0.000008637385,0.0006985076,0.97695607,0.000046327244,0.00033042507,0.0030870445,0.015531253,0.000013176207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058017345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008925798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014664503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034754006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016690316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029720426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171373761","doi":"10.1080/10862960903583202","title":"Reading First in Florida: Five Years of Improvement","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Reading comprehension; Disadvantaged; Psychology; Reading (process); Percentile; Standardized test; Academic achievement; Test (biology); Mathematics education; Cohort; Achievement test; Developmental psychology; Medicine; Statistics","score_opus":0.04912649518893713,"score_gpt":0.44114912778100374,"score_spread":0.3920226325920666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171373761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981735,0.00017883882,0.000073531366,0.00024759062,0.000008535707,0.000022948112,0.00066318363,0.000026116,0.00060578715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982494,0.00010085666,0.00019539178,0.00004794967,0.00000835603,0.00001791955,0.000828732,0.0000026227249,0.0005487722],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990107,0.00014409835,0.000056898127,0.00013418894,0.0002448971,0.00040925381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954803,0.00032016292,0.0018578207,0.00014623848,0.0012472954,0.00094809587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022877837,0.00033362053,0.00043759152,0.0017657258,0.0007648975,0.0007006747,0.0005974521,0.00061334885,0.0012929806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055993055,0.00015452271,0.0005617895,0.0011391985,0.00024369899,0.0010188625,0.00069297577,0.00075224164,0.00021659113],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041846235,0.00048757295,0.94903773,0.000059296093,0.00007590034,0.00016075521,0.0012706425,0.0002178549,0.0009325806,0.00005363254,0.0015238886,0.045761704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004919289,0.0003862338,0.99831426,0.000007840831,0.000016217182,0.00003881954,0.00042190484,0.00008436266,0.00018923021,0.000006438409,0.0005254383,0.0000043366144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.109686196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18894581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.109686196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026039456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024966686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21809548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318169672","doi":"10.1177/1086296x16631231","title":"Editorial","year":2015,"lang":"es","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Mathematics education; Sociology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.09368543806935327,"score_gpt":0.5119418338962373,"score_spread":0.418256395826884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318169672","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000039966413,0.0028221717,0.000053549,0.036492877,0.9562864,0.00003122208,0.00006203357,0.00006319183,0.0041486225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000497002,0.0026680005,0.000081942555,0.027066857,0.9491555,0.000042893025,0.000071666225,0.000044533725,0.020371543],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934823,0.0012066889,0.00074397767,0.00072361814,0.0031169967,0.0007263831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9643917,0.008266022,0.002906564,0.0015879443,0.01661478,0.006232979],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061539453,0.0030882014,0.0029649087,0.0062620016,0.0033544446,0.009781267,0.003036703,0.014148948,0.06982201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048808098,0.0010693189,0.0025875436,0.0017692181,0.0022985165,0.0038118765,0.0027658027,0.011918121,0.04014599],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014251013,0.00000646588,0.000016334523,0.000068139554,0.0000065187496,0.0000619435,0.0000046887726,0.0000045194897,0.000014519636,0.00009347393,0.9964647,0.0032444363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000738771,0.000020385041,0.0002292447,0.00057606015,0.00003900779,0.00021362434,0.000043013133,0.00005735902,0.00007991539,0.0006741633,0.99797994,0.000013331633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014990696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033607492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.930178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034362646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004676095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2325451834","doi":"10.1177/1086296x15620873","title":"Advancing Our Literacy Practices With Sophisticated Theoretical and Methodological Tools","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Psychology; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Sociology","score_opus":0.38127598416153746,"score_gpt":0.5998192217552004,"score_spread":0.21854323759366295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2325451834","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053194907,0.008071485,0.6906516,0.13384864,0.0011839538,0.0009923698,0.0003104038,0.0005262441,0.11122048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3558713,0.00442238,0.6294318,0.004837766,0.00032070416,0.0016078857,0.00012094305,0.00013908822,0.0032481793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9565644,0.034980804,0.0022832933,0.0012866609,0.0041878703,0.00069696835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69340813,0.25565678,0.0075561055,0.024840197,0.016271394,0.002267359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07572851,0.0012996608,0.0009609807,0.011239611,0.003752227,0.017100932,0.0026806595,0.0032961408,0.0087916115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14967522,0.0007729259,0.0008551866,0.0035077147,0.022331074,0.022551956,0.012478148,0.007624842,0.0011694584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017367622,0.00025412606,0.002375433,0.00062144414,0.000031395004,0.00006151893,0.014479944,0.0005080939,0.00047874654,0.90567744,0.002441194,0.07305325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000330499,0.000044265696,0.0009803519,0.0015731329,0.000035818,0.00008820075,0.012195361,0.0028147218,0.00182572,0.947956,0.032429583,0.000023693381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017293913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003319983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07572851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00703824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015944662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40049547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341200525","doi":"10.1177/1086296x15619257","title":"Advancing the Field of Literacy Studies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Field (mathematics); Mathematics education; Psychology; Sociology; Pedagogy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.20922054656049835,"score_gpt":0.5081244356853201,"score_spread":0.2989038891248217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341200525","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016862588,0.22187561,0.014546573,0.59706867,0.004254793,0.00008700213,0.00012329263,0.00010276317,0.14507872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6129512,0.26358202,0.026205633,0.067538135,0.015714176,0.0005007981,0.0001402096,0.00014149185,0.013226298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812837,0.01553473,0.00052418135,0.00075049215,0.0012073718,0.000699532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70841944,0.26935816,0.003813626,0.0056572105,0.005843056,0.0069085713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044171937,0.0006366397,0.0016407766,0.011393525,0.0059158737,0.019956538,0.0020087154,0.00873454,0.018796822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.065562434,0.00054974295,0.0006462289,0.005593043,0.042397168,0.035762217,0.013646966,0.012952098,0.0019180257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044367403,0.00031338545,0.0033660445,0.001590615,0.000032703556,0.0001760098,0.020966325,0.00009483849,0.00029332013,0.85798013,0.019351715,0.095790476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057792127,0.000073820884,0.0024609733,0.007943183,0.000027420501,0.00019217088,0.03783209,0.0002850747,0.0003320358,0.69464153,0.25612357,0.000030297504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002794426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004321634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044171937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004532705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01842499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23360634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2467139089","doi":"10.1177/1086296x16658982","title":"Riding the Lines and Overwriting in the Margins","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Pleasure; Sociology; Embodied cognition; Pride; Aesthetics; Pedagogy; Media studies; Psychology; Art; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.16123070191498254,"score_gpt":0.41190130223600585,"score_spread":0.2506706003210233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2467139089","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9212814,0.0010581855,0.0061807646,0.002074094,0.000111834306,0.000054950917,0.000034853027,0.00011323958,0.06909066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851806,0.00035682332,0.0019266963,0.00020317292,0.00001588729,0.000025371935,0.000012235135,0.00006340005,0.012215817],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976445,0.0012785261,0.000058415375,0.00032874025,0.00037051007,0.00031939507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902284,0.00038215623,0.00019019618,0.00011841352,0.000082984436,0.00020339325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011846437,0.0007448193,0.00047807457,0.0010770453,0.011379376,0.004485507,0.0012854718,0.0018321789,0.003936114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004019476,0.00036047405,0.0003647213,0.0006320092,0.012178376,0.004852814,0.0069840015,0.0021054347,0.0006799106],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004767502,0.00005579279,0.0077859405,0.000099059456,0.000007799756,0.012905333,0.92283064,0.00016479213,0.0022631632,0.028084174,0.0026117344,0.023143826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005386853,0.0001269804,0.0033758888,0.00033409894,0.000026204936,0.012187237,0.8025077,0.00038939912,0.0020348278,0.0034296794,0.1755431,0.000039526334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014359735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04172106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014359735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021988375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013628872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028552294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2518396513","doi":"10.1177/1086296x16665323","title":"The Matter of New Media Making","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Sociology; Feeling; Dialectic; Literacy; Making-of; Digital media; Epistemology; Media studies; Pedagogy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.17161844690803577,"score_gpt":0.4162711903326787,"score_spread":0.2446527434246429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2518396513","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13855103,0.0030520435,0.08597217,0.043293066,0.0009892752,0.0001781802,0.00009972286,0.0002080662,0.7276565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.971025,0.00070823834,0.009231322,0.0012397603,0.00020156958,0.00012888154,0.00003465744,0.00011716023,0.017313559],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98580235,0.009936434,0.00037126464,0.001377401,0.0016648315,0.0008477735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879838,0.007316761,0.00103827,0.002280051,0.00078251516,0.00059853727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012551065,0.0006458619,0.00049013575,0.0018431988,0.008421072,0.01848467,0.0019264696,0.0023351258,0.0058196587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013489461,0.00035417324,0.0005906519,0.0012271275,0.081257544,0.026708156,0.0092212865,0.0051859086,0.00071644573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012592322,0.000014625972,0.00035440605,0.000058053418,0.000005941468,0.000111207904,0.073686175,0.00015304495,0.00025832752,0.9171737,0.0006929395,0.007478977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017933098,0.000047026613,0.0006885151,0.00031509233,0.000025058958,0.000290169,0.09674293,0.0009098771,0.0012442704,0.7191907,0.18049264,0.0000356356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018081443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013690848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01848467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004915096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004229918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06637716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2569601954","doi":"10.1177/1086296x16675714","title":"Literacy “Turns”","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Literacy; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Sociology","score_opus":0.13595401837205462,"score_gpt":0.42681252005617853,"score_spread":0.2908585016841239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2569601954","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020587062,0.0007212316,0.004365577,0.03253231,0.002138882,0.000033220167,0.00019482004,0.0002817662,0.93914515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65613973,0.001140984,0.0024494892,0.025974862,0.0015863882,0.00010190352,0.00040107,0.00093600794,0.3112695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980599,0.0006012599,0.00005646049,0.00033673405,0.00041973646,0.0005258189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99737537,0.0010242593,0.00018061783,0.0003583673,0.00048556316,0.0005757957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011642411,0.0005629835,0.00037636046,0.0016059912,0.0034174547,0.0075662835,0.00062627444,0.0024754156,0.06557678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077304123,0.00042697336,0.00049393397,0.0008124402,0.007348737,0.010144393,0.0064098006,0.0049603125,0.0146690225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017546119,0.000066052824,0.002454613,0.00012147201,0.000018360128,0.0006392539,0.035537437,0.00006548481,0.0016423045,0.8197502,0.07620284,0.063326426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025926438,0.00007666147,0.0038999522,0.00033447635,0.000021626454,0.00041442167,0.027581671,0.00012358178,0.001621442,0.21060592,0.75525594,0.00003836652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031192566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045473506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06557678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020329712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017564554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21937615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588890239","doi":"10.1177/1086296x16686279","title":"Interrupting and Disrupting Literacy Research","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Learning Partnership","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Psychology; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Sociology","score_opus":0.5469483983849375,"score_gpt":0.7368898550725346,"score_spread":0.1899414566875971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588890239","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3867088,0.022706425,0.046063147,0.36494386,0.006025257,0.00096466,0.00039043868,0.0017870789,0.17041022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.933205,0.0031444149,0.016908256,0.035516478,0.0024730463,0.0005355453,0.00014951389,0.00040961083,0.0076580755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.65387726,0.25825563,0.021222934,0.014204142,0.03620112,0.0162389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.27239302,0.445044,0.07837663,0.09602101,0.05525191,0.052913427],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.29013038,0.0007452463,0.0019833539,0.008742202,0.015535734,0.027271898,0.0057842024,0.010218817,0.006445323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4774548,0.0019841092,0.0012437096,0.007089736,0.028328117,0.022372596,0.021040255,0.014143143,0.0020369252],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013880865,0.0013492517,0.12541516,0.0015578988,0.00029225467,0.0022820567,0.14209543,0.001197441,0.0050458834,0.42413482,0.04525436,0.24998736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003234911,0.0010030384,0.061989225,0.0031804212,0.0003136508,0.0015368245,0.093566336,0.001834825,0.0047989343,0.37597784,0.4552354,0.00023994719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009825248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017737346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29013038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020729175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041246884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87539566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612045435","doi":"10.1177/1086296x16637169","title":"Editorial","year":2016,"lang":"es","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Sociology","score_opus":0.046109347644780224,"score_gpt":0.4893775575471271,"score_spread":0.44326820990234683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612045435","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004265023,0.002872265,0.000048053196,0.035473306,0.9571425,0.000029748719,0.000066681736,0.000057715493,0.0042669917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00045040995,0.0027916508,0.000079739366,0.021882944,0.9537204,0.000040549225,0.00006909941,0.000043627657,0.020921564],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939725,0.0010911983,0.0007203086,0.00068072043,0.002850974,0.00068432675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96680385,0.0075219315,0.002876915,0.0016494152,0.015162404,0.005985411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055903834,0.0031990618,0.0030581844,0.0056944727,0.0032170636,0.0093802465,0.0029645576,0.013292231,0.067522146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045439556,0.0010753614,0.002450996,0.0017622303,0.002280581,0.003910009,0.0027156582,0.011948369,0.04192784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015892636,0.00000713878,0.000018124552,0.000078619836,0.0000060963703,0.00007387088,0.000005011066,0.000004620956,0.000017958157,0.00009384586,0.9960096,0.0036692403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069426416,0.00001977604,0.00021565211,0.0005387432,0.000032281663,0.00024069825,0.00004109137,0.00004863836,0.00008349648,0.00064905436,0.9980488,0.000012251137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001335622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030047758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067522146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031470591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042559933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616008473","doi":"10.1177/1086296x17706790","title":"Literacy Research in Uncertain Times","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Learning Partnership","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Literacy; Mathematics education; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.33890892565865743,"score_gpt":0.6369528463668515,"score_spread":0.298043920708194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616008473","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55024713,0.029832778,0.011743138,0.13225661,0.0015538705,0.000039091694,0.0003230966,0.00003921218,0.27396503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927705,0.0025509172,0.00052559684,0.0008548573,0.00037685444,0.000017079708,0.00003588163,0.000012936458,0.0028555174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99577576,0.0030221196,0.0001598942,0.0002475852,0.0003443631,0.00045024854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94958204,0.042290334,0.0026680937,0.0016125219,0.0022018377,0.0016450993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056761,0.00019377552,0.00046113113,0.0020660078,0.0036003941,0.006456102,0.0006285635,0.002402963,0.012754635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049345113,0.00024457418,0.0002145663,0.0029889315,0.0077328086,0.016673105,0.0024097485,0.0031937398,0.0005520828],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032650135,0.0000984077,0.008456602,0.00025888998,0.00003081547,0.00072545896,0.02369687,0.00083182845,0.00018563574,0.9180817,0.0068668174,0.040440515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022206703,0.00006789104,0.0064088865,0.0006104497,0.000028406,0.00040727845,0.047245625,0.0018682443,0.00046827615,0.89862496,0.044210926,0.0000368618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034481317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00332772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012754635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026705002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001673452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04266858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894852105","doi":"10.1177/1086296x18803134","title":"Toward a Model of Global Meaning Making","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Global Education and Multiculturalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of Sydney","keywords":"Sociology; Eclecticism; Indigenous; Meaning (existential); Reading (process); Racism; Decolonization; Critical theory; Cultural capital; Transformative learning; Epistemology; Citizenship; The Imaginary; Gender studies; Pedagogy; Social science; Politics; Political science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.28346569021353196,"score_gpt":0.5583878930108791,"score_spread":0.27492220279734714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894852105","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030028796,0.0015608933,0.34245214,0.04471141,0.00050854735,0.0002166221,0.00020517291,0.0002955761,0.58002084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80358446,0.001476104,0.16560194,0.0032270595,0.00026298533,0.00072758214,0.00022940918,0.00020804703,0.024682501],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997877,0.0012284641,0.000064317384,0.0003612914,0.00028938949,0.00017951216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99768186,0.0010545449,0.00015911221,0.00044345236,0.00037261142,0.00028842565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004486879,0.0008329743,0.0006966236,0.0024952579,0.003888678,0.012691564,0.0021752394,0.0034898457,0.005537139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030642587,0.0004360822,0.0010054436,0.0019709554,0.031173728,0.01548576,0.005397459,0.0050622914,0.0011491165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015349449,0.0000035570904,0.00003750709,0.00000768544,0.0000010672035,0.000019142428,0.0018458952,0.00024164894,0.000026554766,0.997113,0.00016149599,0.00054088887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053003396,0.0000045079246,0.000044096494,0.000028027165,0.000002319065,0.000024686284,0.0014990821,0.001155957,0.000037006837,0.9855145,0.01168046,0.0000041269914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043974505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003922533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012691564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005094087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005952691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036960304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001446865","doi":"10.1177/1086296x19898003","title":"Introducing Offlineness: Theorizing (Digital) Literacy Engagements","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Sociology; Construct (python library); Digital literacy; Literacy; Pedagogy; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.13548606769631166,"score_gpt":0.3922476850730654,"score_spread":0.25676161737675374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3001446865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17686304,0.011463569,0.30487272,0.032622933,0.0009606334,0.0002428588,0.00016781583,0.00025524112,0.4725512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96888226,0.0024696656,0.016728118,0.0015478699,0.0002605199,0.00024400564,0.00008051902,0.00017644376,0.009610475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99387616,0.004350488,0.0001853627,0.0007069503,0.00044067725,0.00044035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871796,0.010053278,0.0006772983,0.0011022327,0.00045706346,0.00053061516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00613651,0.0010397789,0.00060300925,0.0041860407,0.0045725075,0.016127514,0.0018945074,0.0032963334,0.006541363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010477971,0.00052484043,0.00078144576,0.0021633336,0.04894022,0.035395864,0.013280003,0.005737847,0.0008427419],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001305765,0.000027284126,0.0011217124,0.00014630884,0.000007156217,0.000330937,0.13427138,0.0002031276,0.00027839467,0.8564729,0.0005313023,0.0065965094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016331047,0.000050650728,0.000796998,0.0009071659,0.000023753333,0.00063862745,0.13200527,0.0017645104,0.00070503855,0.76554257,0.09752425,0.000024872277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00131495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00094701524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016127514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003192445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018950007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03245336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043304802","doi":"10.1177/1086296x20939559","title":"Dual-Language Books: Enhancing Engagement and Language Awareness","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Alberta Centre for Child, Family and Community Research","keywords":"Literacy; Metalinguistics; Heritage language; Psychology; Pedagogy; Language Experience Approach; Native-language instruction; Reading (process); Metalinguistic awareness; First language; Competence (human resources); Mathematics education; Linguistics; Teaching method; Language education; Comprehension approach; Vocabulary development","score_opus":0.22530634367536528,"score_gpt":0.5868874041755676,"score_spread":0.36158106050020233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043304802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9523619,0.00027989864,0.0031379121,0.0011718735,0.000044570486,0.00027206822,0.00006626572,0.00010344297,0.042562127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9686364,0.0003143869,0.010162675,0.00036121067,0.000010382959,0.0002450728,0.00009863363,0.000025307647,0.020145984],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684674,0.0016234708,0.000057505298,0.00027549153,0.00061125314,0.00058551616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99577373,0.0018694452,0.00022765501,0.00021730288,0.0004335127,0.0014783347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031264678,0.00043223143,0.0004208283,0.0011322103,0.003796403,0.0051564155,0.0018643244,0.0010966063,0.005430756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063065724,0.0002087692,0.00027857439,0.00070723076,0.003077872,0.0019467837,0.006654543,0.0015592952,0.0006743177],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004255533,0.0065989885,0.04642478,0.00093224895,0.00005055443,0.002676728,0.59696496,0.00051890785,0.009934074,0.0136816455,0.011639467,0.31015205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036736182,0.0022526495,0.07165301,0.001121555,0.000169041,0.0012349689,0.6032197,0.002256181,0.012077457,0.011045002,0.29446545,0.00013771011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04073803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13285886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04073803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049244845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009794174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08100188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3188131395","doi":"10.1177/1086296x211031262","title":"Global Literacies Research Diversity: A Manifesto for Change","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Global Education and Multiculturalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Manifesto; Indigenous; Interrogation; Literacy; Globalization; Sociology; Diversity (politics); Dominance (genetics); Educational research; Gender studies; Social science; Political science; Pedagogy; Anthropology; Law","score_opus":0.47991969192954054,"score_gpt":0.602370602254926,"score_spread":0.12245091032538546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3188131395","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02284017,0.00872713,0.01848155,0.77114373,0.011659539,0.0003754487,0.0005095232,0.00039724153,0.16586566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81760806,0.0090682125,0.027685696,0.07576695,0.006663675,0.0014681945,0.0007052971,0.0013576042,0.059676282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9585538,0.031655364,0.0015397428,0.0016214561,0.0047310186,0.0018985363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9153636,0.060258426,0.0025264514,0.012845382,0.0041262796,0.0048799226],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08563704,0.0008201411,0.0007517708,0.003039092,0.011816221,0.03032334,0.0018961907,0.0065957615,0.004334407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048519902,0.0005230169,0.0005933704,0.006077508,0.06438399,0.027847366,0.024586199,0.017526865,0.00075955904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023710849,0.000043111555,0.0004464698,0.00018034056,0.0000054376087,0.00017496102,0.19350606,0.0001026534,0.0005607225,0.7448599,0.041364085,0.01873252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017915345,0.000036370362,0.00051431626,0.00042456487,0.0000076070028,0.00012577769,0.071102194,0.00012280031,0.00041084673,0.14484267,0.78236556,0.000029318731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035862986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057679745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91436297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012000112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020209717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45289737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210853299","doi":"10.1177/1086296x221076431","title":"Leading Literate Lives: Afghan Refugee Children in a First-Asylum Country","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Education and experiences of immigrants and refugees","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Ethnography; Literacy; Reading (process); Afghan; Pedagogy; Psychology; Sociology; Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.03613378154286592,"score_gpt":0.4296844835535661,"score_spread":0.3935507020107002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210853299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898555,0.0013451463,0.00008312666,0.0034371174,0.00006392621,0.00004959641,0.000060955947,0.000010100049,0.0050944225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937412,0.0018386096,0.0002540454,0.0015897332,0.000016553333,0.00005266863,0.000040705727,0.000012465071,0.0024539141],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983193,0.0007104725,0.00004635006,0.00009234774,0.00012751696,0.00070405536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801886,0.00054662843,0.00026513232,0.000080879225,0.00016244584,0.0009260782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020895,0.0006182354,0.0008368762,0.0009090066,0.021154793,0.005689262,0.0012360881,0.0018895944,0.004220407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031523367,0.0006078882,0.00038067938,0.00095092243,0.010336564,0.004202739,0.008184356,0.0040345676,0.0005113064],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016726355,0.00005622686,0.01155212,0.000103295686,0.000004378311,0.0026397195,0.97903675,0.000010962844,0.00037092448,0.0009193698,0.0012660127,0.004023478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014266059,0.000025399582,0.0022983854,0.000062929525,0.00000238256,0.00053338724,0.99373627,0.0000028186628,0.0000334367,0.00006985008,0.0032282877,0.000005535768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03253497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08000317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03253497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037554759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006627754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064691186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211155351","doi":"10.1177/1086296x221076436","title":"Student-Generated Questions in Literacy Education and Assessment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reading comprehension; Reading (process); Psychology; Literacy; Comprehension; Multilevel model; Grade level; Mathematics education; Quality (philosophy); Pedagogy; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.09354785950552523,"score_gpt":0.5629030605721215,"score_spread":0.46935520106659623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211155351","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9785256,0.00081091165,0.014726984,0.0005815973,0.000029970714,0.00028131358,0.00018379364,0.00009543422,0.004764424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99263424,0.0001888833,0.0062886276,0.00006522338,0.0000122979945,0.0001553143,0.00013973788,0.000008580022,0.00050722214],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.982216,0.014526124,0.00083322177,0.00058634905,0.0015470494,0.00029118944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7829869,0.18851842,0.014628879,0.0041534253,0.0073763393,0.0023360658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014855629,0.00033257162,0.00041759055,0.0019507739,0.00027720808,0.0015349633,0.0006124376,0.00055983843,0.001860704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14286909,0.00018439787,0.00039104818,0.001446987,0.0007546692,0.0017859975,0.0013270084,0.0008594024,0.00038484696],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004976518,0.0017451629,0.6704987,0.000485283,0.00015410036,0.00032014647,0.021896446,0.0021766305,0.0020363717,0.004388402,0.0012971362,0.294504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001202382,0.0017584806,0.9339502,0.0006329117,0.00014632588,0.0010377317,0.010276699,0.013320717,0.0047677304,0.017589314,0.016272347,0.0001273097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011061233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011526302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014855629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006554261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009261359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220847939","doi":"10.1177/1086296x221076610","title":"Categorization in Literacy Contexts: The Short-Term and Long-Term Effects of Labeling Students and Their Literacies","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Term (time); Literacy; Categorization; Psychology; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.09290683550672207,"score_gpt":0.5457878983125898,"score_spread":0.4528810628058677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220847939","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950388,0.00049951393,0.00016595423,0.00066329614,0.000048992017,0.00004447657,0.00006986424,0.000016588783,0.003452499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99837494,0.00008702857,0.00013435178,0.00008573023,0.000018936855,0.000024440618,0.00009093409,0.000009303209,0.0011742893],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887327,0.0055363416,0.0005323016,0.0016666986,0.0020141972,0.0015177839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8780277,0.06918444,0.02046803,0.0085029015,0.011253461,0.01256342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015695883,0.00035038716,0.00090543437,0.0021926288,0.0038319137,0.009838493,0.0023245134,0.0037835462,0.007174103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09277519,0.00062834757,0.0011976087,0.0024682118,0.0045565637,0.008439484,0.007704391,0.0037031549,0.00094370963],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0042013633,0.00550806,0.89153314,0.00019328757,0.00047043947,0.0003096758,0.043555725,0.0006420298,0.002419548,0.0034027928,0.0015646972,0.04619922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067027744,0.000813983,0.9578638,0.00013944198,0.00017634836,0.00005994912,0.035519645,0.0007440946,0.0007072684,0.0021140976,0.0017074618,0.000086974265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026462473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034756944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026462473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048108506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033336135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083008766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225152770","doi":"10.1177/1086296x221096671","title":"<i>Éclosions</i> in Literacy Research: Rereading Brandt and Clinton’s “Limits of the Local”","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Dichotomy; Sociology; Perspective (graphical); Critical literacy; Extension (predicate logic); Media studies; Political science; Epistemology; Pedagogy; Philosophy; Art; Visual arts; Computer science","score_opus":0.2205947550451991,"score_gpt":0.4477736965969484,"score_spread":0.22717894155174928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225152770","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039889447,0.03588418,0.012035586,0.8105093,0.008644289,0.000044057582,0.00003163779,0.00010034724,0.09286107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81584406,0.016011083,0.007146835,0.13524245,0.008942647,0.0002408016,0.00002728961,0.00021576445,0.01632909],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9849089,0.011724994,0.00035623895,0.00096376875,0.0014786747,0.00056740316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97046316,0.023576623,0.0014030935,0.0015101344,0.0016070062,0.0014399836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015958164,0.0005412055,0.00070518075,0.002428428,0.01170952,0.02310847,0.0020061038,0.0073370454,0.0018906676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0234947,0.00032667737,0.000479117,0.0025917976,0.10078101,0.029307446,0.012009812,0.014719178,0.00037542643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019162684,0.0000213447,0.0006297615,0.00011643641,0.0000060519455,0.00023141463,0.21100567,0.000047050307,0.00014326745,0.75624853,0.022210235,0.009321063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015621488,0.000033139706,0.00084009947,0.0010453452,0.0000139060885,0.00047638355,0.1801365,0.0003479647,0.00052034203,0.456028,0.36048338,0.000059341502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034777548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055323676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02310847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050927103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058647906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084395826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229368359","doi":"10.1177/1086296x221098068","title":"Private Readerly Experiences of Presence: Why They Matter","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Set (abstract data type); Mandate; Point (geometry); Sociology; Epistemology; Psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.09661324500492427,"score_gpt":0.3823237369909209,"score_spread":0.28571049198599663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229368359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63684887,0.017054077,0.011950552,0.106374666,0.0012887717,0.00007474315,0.00017729003,0.00015849463,0.22607253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99627966,0.00077185035,0.00024786885,0.0011088991,0.00014350131,0.000016722315,0.000015371656,0.00003766298,0.0013785496],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99004364,0.005949289,0.00035197244,0.0012264128,0.0012035494,0.0012251263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96393216,0.026843349,0.0027720234,0.0016056373,0.0018571462,0.0029895585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061167777,0.00026577304,0.0005582825,0.0014256828,0.004341817,0.013162192,0.00093553285,0.0032254953,0.009691469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03819896,0.0003697556,0.0004185558,0.0010122374,0.031035313,0.020653188,0.007009668,0.003691885,0.0008177555],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021519883,0.000100637604,0.035434388,0.00054352003,0.00006261186,0.0009061821,0.5829271,0.0001115162,0.0005573394,0.31239644,0.008303067,0.05844211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061441824,0.00012276377,0.042421594,0.0013374549,0.00007637624,0.0018332045,0.6806546,0.0002843402,0.000612342,0.18190283,0.090595596,0.000097523895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022349537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023432616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013162192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021363746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014387388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03242123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254652524","doi":"10.1207/s15548430jlr3403_6","title":"Book Review","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Mathematics education; Sociology","score_opus":0.1799128003600174,"score_gpt":0.5044358625708032,"score_spread":0.3245230622107858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254652524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004901955,0.09527002,0.0012404773,0.042979173,0.068001345,0.00022669793,0.0010219484,0.00071725744,0.7900529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008749538,0.017761197,0.00028943724,0.0056345374,0.005757215,0.000048673926,0.00033730254,0.00010167666,0.96919495],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934465,0.00006526405,0.000021138081,0.00006271117,0.0004466096,0.000059603626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971209,0.00050660333,0.0001244833,0.00021003462,0.0015680083,0.0004700545],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073361763,0.0006498586,0.000872134,0.0034437564,0.0013463182,0.0035243628,0.0012412226,0.0022246914,0.38614514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004562013,0.00035317402,0.00047069223,0.0031564988,0.0006488418,0.0020969233,0.0012854327,0.0022919823,0.34304112],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045934025,0.000008511851,0.000022127557,0.00007010855,0.0000010338118,0.000016629103,0.00000687828,0.000015380052,0.000033754717,0.0008298887,0.9530065,0.045984503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022785675,0.000004070346,0.00008213106,0.00009229093,0.0000015557164,0.0000315523,0.000012621756,0.000010628108,0.000021124988,0.00035313706,0.9993869,0.0000016241244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046546636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013299726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6138549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016385855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029382538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87558943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381512536","doi":"10.1177/1086296x231178513","title":"Theorizing Literacies as Affective Flows: Attuning to the Otherwise Possibilities of Hip-Hop's “In-the-Red Frequencies”","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Critical Race Theory in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Sociology; Privilege (computing); Literacy; Oppression; Posthumanism; Hegemony; Aesthetics; Politics; Critical literacy; Humanism; Epistemology; Pedagogy; Law","score_opus":0.09831042212335046,"score_gpt":0.5176913601135695,"score_spread":0.4193809379902191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381512536","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3395207,0.0017438874,0.19454889,0.023865793,0.00024441697,0.00017849581,0.000048120066,0.00014752732,0.43970212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99108666,0.00028266967,0.005274985,0.00052043144,0.00004331446,0.00006124102,0.000011596387,0.00002043727,0.0026985742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965726,0.0024606925,0.000067065965,0.00022062512,0.00039306196,0.00028579342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996064,0.0026466565,0.00041731683,0.00036814142,0.00022867981,0.00027508422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045798775,0.00049668294,0.00021827368,0.0023246661,0.0032271468,0.00913929,0.00086625083,0.0013079036,0.0024087364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072893878,0.00026923418,0.00034835943,0.00093815045,0.038162623,0.012419094,0.006536202,0.0026887485,0.00021907788],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000094912175,0.000016773178,0.0012105523,0.000039624552,0.0000045225884,0.0000877572,0.057783734,0.00030630274,0.0002267809,0.9328976,0.00027536016,0.0071415505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012175893,0.00003344348,0.0013097762,0.00015873552,0.00001685407,0.00015672515,0.044692103,0.0020784084,0.00048853154,0.9285686,0.022469372,0.000015298216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013568094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010731147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00913929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025698838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001729197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024220943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388830929","doi":"10.1177/1086296x231215326","title":"Reading Rhetorically: Discussing the Ethics of Narrative Form","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Digital Storytelling and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Rhetorical question; Narratology; Reading (process); Narrative criticism; Narrative inquiry; Sociology; Pedagogy; Narrative network; Psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.372637943649505,"score_gpt":0.6150995211894381,"score_spread":0.24246157753993314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388830929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66198707,0.0105152,0.10206254,0.05084234,0.0011704064,0.00022771694,0.00008645044,0.00015182338,0.1729564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889775,0.0010644875,0.0052843057,0.0010707589,0.00018878175,0.00006456926,0.000021160437,0.00006206203,0.0032664419],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9780506,0.019319689,0.0003198129,0.00062369683,0.0010380603,0.00064818375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96404135,0.030875128,0.0021982987,0.000925879,0.0010988371,0.0008603138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015665105,0.00074462837,0.0005324508,0.0028059524,0.008901884,0.013520441,0.001450347,0.0032569773,0.0020976278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026481733,0.00043653452,0.0003814286,0.0014651706,0.040186744,0.01526044,0.008151513,0.0051037706,0.00035441155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013952802,0.000012364445,0.0010085058,0.00006914535,0.0000056636422,0.00042111077,0.89598435,0.000062251456,0.0005385493,0.09601971,0.00061647425,0.005247886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012325841,0.0000663195,0.0015408507,0.0005631908,0.000014562821,0.0012226907,0.795473,0.0005519738,0.0015930468,0.07515189,0.12378476,0.000025333811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012540269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021359955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015665105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037394913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025787458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08284593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393316087","doi":"10.1177/1086296x241244682","title":"Temporal Seeing as Visual Literacy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Literacy; Visual literacy; Reading (process); Mathematics education; Cognitive psychology; Pedagogy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.09541842921386917,"score_gpt":0.46971158466631013,"score_spread":0.37429315545244096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393316087","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07751503,0.0068681356,0.07003101,0.02604533,0.0007274769,0.00008268672,0.00011925625,0.00031409564,0.81829697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96989375,0.0018938131,0.007761228,0.0014220169,0.00022943907,0.000059730843,0.000042744945,0.00015882083,0.018538484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964965,0.0022508674,0.000109340224,0.00034778586,0.00043267704,0.00036294572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949551,0.003021121,0.0005681634,0.00062079454,0.0004504152,0.00038432036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003074728,0.0004193654,0.00025866824,0.0015972264,0.0037229392,0.009923156,0.0007536835,0.002178669,0.008042457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009637784,0.00020638746,0.0003630802,0.0012193995,0.03894682,0.012834522,0.006042772,0.0030099053,0.00073358684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020095202,0.000009172798,0.00047757433,0.000085547385,0.000002880997,0.00016367406,0.06151326,0.00009525969,0.0004569514,0.923435,0.0017541286,0.011986464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016742211,0.00005931906,0.0011231558,0.0005803934,0.000015548916,0.0009508807,0.059077542,0.00057417096,0.0010734765,0.71690017,0.21959162,0.000037014725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025855864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026466376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009923156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031884052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023555232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026904702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408646447","doi":"10.1177/1086296x251318428","title":"Running Around in the Story: Un/Raveling Compositions of Narrative Play","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Narrative; Posthuman; Embodied cognition; Composition (language); Literacy; Sociology; Narrative inquiry; Story telling; Storytelling; Aesthetics; Dynamics (music); Psychology; Literature; Art; Epistemology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.09329834820966375,"score_gpt":0.4232288439977775,"score_spread":0.32993049578811373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408646447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7624647,0.002232648,0.03341005,0.0015810351,0.00016210687,0.00014596277,0.00020935538,0.0003372735,0.1994569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827601,0.0005696623,0.006875363,0.000082004815,0.000025116231,0.00006310673,0.00009463357,0.00014516537,0.009385027],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974137,0.0016260169,0.00007393248,0.00030455578,0.0003036958,0.00027809356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978555,0.001278816,0.00023513973,0.00024281403,0.000100717596,0.00028693906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017355997,0.0005984765,0.0003440508,0.001320401,0.004289401,0.0059438013,0.00079906604,0.0007090157,0.0069956123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005123559,0.00039576206,0.0003989428,0.0007791711,0.009753567,0.0063680015,0.0058134985,0.0013741336,0.0005757767],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001424905,0.000040530856,0.006505401,0.00021630924,0.000022210583,0.0029756823,0.86517155,0.00027950294,0.003779474,0.08718432,0.0016536898,0.03202882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019947614,0.00015676703,0.015029416,0.00055390154,0.000060542337,0.0045758323,0.6802962,0.0011325927,0.004768259,0.025681429,0.2676594,0.00006569064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026302126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006357067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069956123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012854469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067020074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02340269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416943947","doi":"10.1177/1086296x251401121","title":"Reading and Equity in Teacher Education: An Exploratory Study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Critical Race Theory in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University; University of British Columbia; University of Saskatchewan; Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Equity (law); Reading (process); Exploratory research; Nexus (standard); Qualitative research; Educational equity; Teacher education; Higher education","score_opus":0.15403921435615098,"score_gpt":0.6227238681979511,"score_spread":0.46868465384180014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416943947","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99392927,0.00014975884,0.0008007776,0.00050960045,0.000010526851,0.00011788035,0.000028723984,0.00001055218,0.0044428227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959527,0.00024559558,0.0006363085,0.0001807023,0.000012639072,0.00015603607,0.000023235065,0.000012596066,0.002780265],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955188,0.0028870627,0.0001472578,0.00032714222,0.00047466275,0.0006449555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892764,0.0077103497,0.00083316694,0.00043483716,0.00068987504,0.0010553597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049228305,0.000330058,0.0009384821,0.0015126826,0.0073914565,0.0046652774,0.001154258,0.0015687691,0.0027493213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013145863,0.00063903304,0.0002005017,0.0016701126,0.0043362076,0.003331944,0.003853068,0.002585841,0.00043584098],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004056101,0.0004976258,0.011098123,0.00012207225,0.0000026665468,0.0015423646,0.9761163,0.000033883465,0.0010731785,0.001286513,0.0003058077,0.007880885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009258522,0.00019397389,0.009582856,0.000089309666,0.000003863791,0.0007057714,0.98004663,0.00009366333,0.00035386014,0.0004066866,0.008504955,0.000009147918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031505823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007245711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073914565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002187069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029369534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026034772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}