{"meta":{"query_hash":"351841ffced6","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Literacy Research"},"cohort_total":34,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":34,"exported":34,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/351841ffced6","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Literacy+Research"},"results":[{"id":"W1882583343","doi":"10.1080/10862960701331944","title":"Letters, Imagined Communities, and Literate Identities: Perspectives from Rural Ugandan Women","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Reading (process); Sociocultural evolution; Ethnography; Sociology; Identity (music); Situated; Personhood; Gender studies; Meaning (existential); Pedagogy; Psychology; Anthropology; Aesthetics; Linguistics; Political science","score_opus":0.044854334569681076,"score_gpt":0.36064879857610455,"score_spread":0.31579446400642347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1882583343","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99130183,0.0044617737,0.000021844224,0.00150198,0.0009985678,0.00010300195,0.00004241053,0.000013907374,0.0015547096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906609,0.00045806135,0.00020719862,0.0003427168,0.0048246146,0.0000052202827,0.000027073373,0.000023421197,0.0034507648],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976291,0.00035496792,0.0006156007,0.00011482771,0.00072754215,0.0005579686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967319,0.0010858936,0.00021623929,0.00024064785,0.0014586337,0.00026672787],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031735017,0.00015692554,0.00028884568,0.0007579974,0.00055340974,0.0020498408,0.0003646553,0.00003603786,0.0016545855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016123863,0.00012520784,0.0000795946,0.00011997514,0.00060800044,0.0024732267,0.00009097705,0.0008296249,0.000024009454],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027766734,0.00013412739,0.005599553,0.000047288802,0.000079144455,0.000050363516,0.9821729,1.0485326e-7,0.0004364361,0.0013838322,0.0063117296,0.0035068311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008531164,0.00025775854,0.006972214,0.0003013086,0.0000132924115,0.000057218534,0.92446005,0.00001152981,0.00013038807,0.008065447,0.058709294,0.00016837716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009562308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008776626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057712864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025745312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013104315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99925804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978455512","doi":"10.1207/s15548430jlr3601_3","title":"Perspectives on Struggling English Language Learners: Case Studies of Two Chinese-Canadian Children","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Psychology; Viewpoints; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Preference","score_opus":0.052457601582164386,"score_gpt":0.461100238757123,"score_spread":0.40864263717495863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978455512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877995,0.0062664696,0.0000049195455,0.00039892524,0.00043810543,0.00016281389,0.000018902405,0.000010257609,0.004900108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968806,0.00013856948,0.0011452574,0.000043867592,0.0009492696,0.000005295713,0.0000029577152,0.00002684627,0.00080736703],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741226,0.00046491303,0.0006488903,0.00026375134,0.0006680709,0.0005421294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970375,0.0006481859,0.00025053957,0.00033627046,0.0014151615,0.00031234993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028429788,0.00017425262,0.00040811335,0.0014797447,0.0002129416,0.00011825732,0.00035096274,0.000069574045,0.00026615013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014868424,0.00012786833,0.00015639969,0.00069927936,0.00018178098,0.00031617293,0.000053458512,0.0011449641,0.000042973727],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027860393,0.0003680957,0.054002535,0.000034984696,0.0007128393,0.007890324,0.9219691,0.00017868285,0.00017753844,0.0018587261,0.00064871577,0.011879853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010962251,0.0037989065,0.093838155,0.002210239,0.00008236233,0.017607486,0.8634113,0.000013588436,0.00071909523,0.0039010926,0.0026463831,0.0008091551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061541884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004982722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058557812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042616486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032884974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9303333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994405758","doi":"10.1177/1086296x10397870","title":"Warning","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Interpretation (philosophy); Perspective (graphical); Consistency (knowledge bases); Metafiction; Pedagogy; Psychology; Mathematics education; Visual arts; Computer science; Literature; Art; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.42246186007763886,"score_gpt":0.4256817879968252,"score_spread":0.0032199279191863495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994405758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95406765,0.00080567476,0.000013181375,0.0003908508,0.001726269,0.000056061886,0.0000019478164,0.00000818197,0.042930193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98423195,0.00006491451,0.00049410824,0.00009908466,0.0040156343,0.0000027463964,0.0000018297839,0.000012429527,0.011077298],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845904,0.00020859756,0.00040500826,0.000083110805,0.0005546641,0.00028960645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977433,0.0002604601,0.00015895041,0.00014346738,0.0015447031,0.00014911091],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020651468,0.00006734747,0.00013685488,0.0004619973,0.0002559994,0.00031303614,0.00028191542,0.00002579997,0.006165355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034653893,0.000047993453,0.00008450785,0.00008197621,0.00015249228,0.0012218831,0.00003362394,0.0005742008,0.00022779772],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007437328,0.00014685563,0.0029813633,0.000033222903,0.00002211878,0.000034935358,0.95605433,7.580948e-8,0.000022308783,0.004908951,0.01699959,0.018721895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045318005,0.00061807205,0.0050525465,0.0002857455,0.000015657128,0.00008773708,0.118940294,0.000032318883,0.00050663395,0.015752144,0.85811365,0.0001420082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011207604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008419635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8411141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046961723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016464845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99474317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010143454","doi":"10.1207/s15548430jlr3401_4","title":"Teaching Decoding Skills to Poor Readers in High School","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Reading comprehension; Class (philosophy); Mathematics education; Test (biology); Reading (process); Control (management); Comprehension; Analysis of covariance; Word (group theory); Computer science; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07488036412231054,"score_gpt":0.44380721756244157,"score_spread":0.36892685344013104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010143454","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9762025,0.0005912279,0.00013730415,0.007738943,0.0007205397,0.0001994325,0.0000023654802,0.000012712901,0.0143950125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95938,0.000039468814,0.009979346,0.00072718476,0.00062761625,0.000014866678,0.0000010322243,0.000030367017,0.02920016],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960306,0.0010066108,0.00097254256,0.00029021708,0.00091029814,0.00078971375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997601,0.0010136936,0.00017923633,0.0003155519,0.00040699358,0.00048356171],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005836842,0.00015368147,0.00034715657,0.002037341,0.00016578227,0.000282278,0.00058650546,0.00010471707,0.0028433795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014994205,0.00012836204,0.00009912265,0.0007719382,0.00003920934,0.0005490088,0.00009891722,0.0020075839,0.0011668016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044248268,0.0013924977,0.12802716,0.00006672628,0.00017584737,0.002495693,0.1861897,0.000048299156,0.0016356813,0.0015571269,0.20352449,0.4744443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005597914,0.0016844263,0.3149009,0.0032105194,0.000020331583,0.0017424085,0.011143671,0.00033463037,0.00053101836,0.00245811,0.6575455,0.0008305675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026675197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000043666137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47361374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038455217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060749175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070973507","doi":"10.1080/10862960009548077","title":"Critical Issues: Researching Complexity","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Rubric; Reading (process); Sociology; Enlightenment; Epistemology; Critical theory; Pedagogy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.2903594119367914,"score_gpt":0.6031508746028263,"score_spread":0.31279146266603497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070973507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48431563,0.0014832056,0.00012540424,0.2392186,0.0006315262,0.00020186497,0.0000035960704,0.00003216036,0.273988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9630551,0.000758127,0.012978397,0.00060551835,0.0015393355,0.0000032644336,7.8743324e-7,0.000010166028,0.021049358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945315,0.0019697757,0.00043492002,0.00012629994,0.0023445906,0.0005928943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951836,0.0020337794,0.000030167037,0.00014555194,0.0021208231,0.00048607957],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0131998975,0.00005931319,0.00016172719,0.00028033342,0.0010264738,0.00067672523,0.00058172795,0.00006160498,0.014715738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070893806,0.000050254126,0.000080430764,0.0006301635,0.0010514705,0.0007171909,0.000043895852,0.0010820847,0.00041109807],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018738286,0.0006838635,0.0027136,0.000058890793,0.000028636692,0.00017703066,0.1398472,0.000001159736,0.000097472264,0.57667345,0.05582238,0.22370893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012794789,0.00008955255,0.0027100204,0.0001594083,0.0000018616336,0.000015843569,0.0041181413,0.000012236959,0.00003463232,0.21848376,0.7741852,0.00006139483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028578416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018214727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7183628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020585119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008229214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98618495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096343226","doi":"10.1207/s15548430jlr3402_6","title":"Creating Commonplaces for Interpretation: Literary Anthropology and Literacy Education Research","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Literacy; Sociology; Literary criticism; Literary science; Literacy education; Anthropology; Epistemology; Literature; Pedagogy; Linguistics; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.14824578707078592,"score_gpt":0.5530657375316138,"score_spread":0.40481995046082786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096343226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8014173,0.0220751,0.00089620624,0.11298673,0.0020627682,0.0009841599,0.000007623233,0.000032330623,0.0595378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748511,0.0015099018,0.013284145,0.0004313426,0.0011865139,0.00003935117,0.0000034160862,0.000012710306,0.008681532],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957268,0.0019247199,0.0005713875,0.0001951396,0.0010749088,0.0005070117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892443,0.0055627516,0.00013080171,0.00014389926,0.0046152165,0.0003030279],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01032312,0.0000827249,0.00020024394,0.00077309826,0.0015131428,0.00094735925,0.00038719623,0.0001008305,0.0009850851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005868891,0.00007321602,0.00006213324,0.00075513293,0.0008571637,0.0011652837,0.0000803615,0.00079757045,0.000023764998],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011337133,0.00048756928,0.0058939653,0.00011775534,0.00002648479,0.0000074812415,0.40487927,2.0861683e-7,0.000068082016,0.0477518,0.0247054,0.5159486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045055,0.00054476305,0.0021942344,0.0008699222,0.000008482694,0.000056804154,0.034800597,0.00047419706,0.00009102494,0.14325882,0.81710434,0.0001462464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008688836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011837136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7923989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024045332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006388926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106236178","doi":"10.1177/1086296x14534180","title":"From <i>Aquí</i> and <i>Allá</i>","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Sight; Sociology; Literacy; Pedagogy; Curriculum; Class (philosophy); Reading (process); Identity (music); Mathematics education; Artifact (error); Psychology; Linguistics; Aesthetics; Computer science; Art","score_opus":0.07527939574674813,"score_gpt":0.3732582856172483,"score_spread":0.29797888987050014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106236178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98490804,0.0014530796,0.00002491616,0.002673703,0.001471421,0.00006226296,0.000011914168,0.00000790511,0.0093867285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98414046,0.00015508434,0.00035371954,0.00050616864,0.010285216,0.000002791782,0.000008478325,0.0000149385205,0.004533147],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826807,0.00030742056,0.00041754488,0.0001306264,0.00060120015,0.000275164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975266,0.0009642947,0.00015137863,0.00018146625,0.00097356475,0.00020271723],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019260958,0.00009026135,0.0001985177,0.000268568,0.00025556338,0.0008189333,0.00023686816,0.00003617653,0.0010288269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039203404,0.000065626606,0.00006366412,0.000061338666,0.00021449104,0.001015728,0.000049183036,0.00051653053,0.000088972825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012141101,0.00017023232,0.0029465714,0.000059619935,0.000042685326,0.000014151935,0.83169806,3.244238e-7,0.00022691365,0.0056918757,0.09328441,0.06574375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048873154,0.00027026952,0.0010942925,0.00016944313,0.000013110217,0.000020744223,0.017271392,0.00007001972,0.00020379756,0.022559859,0.95774305,0.00009531161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025650897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024344672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8644586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030617543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000095499745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138095014","doi":"10.1177/1086296x12457167","title":"Measuring Situated Literacy Activity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Family literacy; Literacy; Situated; Curriculum; Pedagogy; Information literacy; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Empirical research; Mathematics education; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.21593189639927202,"score_gpt":0.4836394933325129,"score_spread":0.26770759693324087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138095014","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.978376,0.00280432,0.00029546215,0.0006831214,0.001723894,0.00015374765,0.0000036653346,0.000023197825,0.015936641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98552126,0.000051509287,0.0017416611,0.00008192263,0.0016879201,0.000011867423,0.0000021212054,0.000035973364,0.010865768],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99519783,0.0013835476,0.00076805544,0.00022069557,0.001326202,0.0011036408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959601,0.0011341076,0.00035575844,0.00044898663,0.0015455731,0.0005554871],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00846122,0.00019555104,0.00039116287,0.001035935,0.0002383448,0.0003228611,0.0005346385,0.00013269339,0.0014546275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057661935,0.00015374241,0.00019355724,0.0008818108,0.00008765681,0.0019044115,0.00013544585,0.0015755999,0.0007570174],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014378539,0.0022646545,0.2246403,0.00012840237,0.00054963725,0.00048587212,0.13163938,0.0000038271046,0.01597124,0.0013176874,0.027518462,0.59404266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016714849,0.00041962086,0.52091825,0.0005243306,0.000027269765,0.001399208,0.00061770703,0.000032327986,0.0050114277,0.00042385183,0.46859756,0.00035696273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000051111918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.0857007e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59368575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002636448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001439173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139313182","doi":"10.1207/s15548430jlr3501_3","title":"At Play on the Borders of the Diegetic: Story Boundaries and Narrative Interpretation","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Digital Storytelling and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Interpretation (philosophy); Variety (cybernetics); Notice; Visual arts; Aesthetics; Event (particle physics); Literature; Fictional universe; Phenomenon; Sociology; History; Media studies; Art; Linguistics; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09452934573702101,"score_gpt":0.5019507715516945,"score_spread":0.40742142581467355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139313182","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97966456,0.0007552156,0.00002196024,0.007273646,0.0007039458,0.00020331125,0.0000024309898,0.0000017503132,0.011373158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99382824,0.00005519035,0.000038564132,0.00023073348,0.000083175684,0.0000074005748,4.0500774e-7,0.000006914081,0.005749364],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99702764,0.0019113069,0.00031787073,0.00006944306,0.00048527532,0.00018847633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956856,0.0030695659,0.00027726614,0.00014691398,0.0007625243,0.0000581273],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038385394,0.00005483214,0.00011053125,0.00010660249,0.0015477207,0.000059684742,0.0001492219,0.00004585065,0.00012854232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034297954,0.00002677471,0.000044397468,0.00018185304,0.00040053387,0.00020228457,0.000039229057,0.0009611041,0.000011823169],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00083380647,0.0001767349,0.027447792,0.00017182095,0.000080015954,0.000002282689,0.8521645,0.000024735435,0.00070382823,0.017262423,0.091098756,0.010033322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058483094,0.00070245325,0.038918316,0.0015644495,0.000013436514,0.000013540978,0.0932839,0.00006947721,0.0008879416,0.013826812,0.85004056,0.00009428179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017579936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017413391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7589418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020205526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006283636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171373761","doi":"10.1080/10862960903583202","title":"Reading First in Florida: Five Years of Improvement","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Reading comprehension; Disadvantaged; Psychology; Reading (process); Percentile; Standardized test; Academic achievement; Test (biology); Mathematics education; Cohort; Achievement test; Developmental psychology; Medicine; Statistics","score_opus":0.04912649518893713,"score_gpt":0.44114912778100374,"score_spread":0.3920226325920666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171373761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99422646,0.00007898205,0.0000013903997,0.0013657337,0.00046706444,0.00007628997,0.0000015470436,0.0000016660704,0.0037808951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969162,0.00036894737,0.00035357883,0.000024810652,0.0011750626,0.0000022150061,2.3049705e-7,0.000004439591,0.0011545523],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982343,0.00011311975,0.00036644327,0.00007466081,0.00091966573,0.00029180993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984017,0.00057449786,0.00014842684,0.0001219839,0.0006333669,0.00011999536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005839365,0.00003861743,0.00013497219,0.0003951529,0.0001298221,0.00009007049,0.0004027457,0.00006269756,0.00025873762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013184985,0.000034733534,0.000057062654,0.0005864199,0.00013216025,0.00069547043,0.000050859107,0.0009364001,0.000017843258],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045977646,0.00030030738,0.62949055,0.00012855299,0.000045322166,0.00018084893,0.159428,0.000028426932,0.031835448,0.002887245,0.011935106,0.16328038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015604382,0.0008110772,0.48066077,0.0006171702,0.000008181194,0.000014314268,0.010178478,0.00016358045,0.005355639,0.003604752,0.4968229,0.00020270997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001679097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014412348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4848878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008106001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032952588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40682444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318169672","doi":"10.1177/1086296x16631231","title":"Editorial","year":2015,"lang":"es","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Mathematics education; Sociology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.09368543806935327,"score_gpt":0.5119418338962373,"score_spread":0.418256395826884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318169672","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015192584,0.0075079706,0.000003480925,0.00043183792,0.9843296,0.0006738483,0.0013529883,0.00003316812,0.0041478747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006081944,0.0019512615,0.0005956563,0.0000061548294,0.98795485,0.000016678774,0.00018473312,0.00069539086,0.007987097],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93566513,0.010103793,0.0050262236,0.0010402016,0.04507455,0.0030901278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8561223,0.015407899,0.004392135,0.0017812699,0.11928834,0.003008044],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09284132,0.0012121963,0.003161171,0.0075252657,0.00064256985,0.0055315527,0.0063146777,0.003906997,0.0009512079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10352365,0.0010183561,0.0014485349,0.004133724,0.0012693844,0.0042717634,0.0017229355,0.03224728,0.015056015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013465574,0.001254879,0.00012969263,0.00059206266,0.00089541735,0.0013594787,0.003235274,0.0000118809985,0.0012789213,0.000039383278,0.97510415,0.002633295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006953759,0.0055660363,0.000018646244,0.0042632385,0.00025355275,0.00023480176,0.00029959148,0.000023771372,0.00008871844,0.002266925,0.97923344,0.0007975043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018099543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004355812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0795428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064342753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03147809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2325451834","doi":"10.1177/1086296x15620873","title":"Advancing Our Literacy Practices With Sophisticated Theoretical and Methodological Tools","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Psychology; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Sociology","score_opus":0.38127598416153746,"score_gpt":0.5998192217552004,"score_spread":0.21854323759366295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2325451834","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7257223,0.0014851158,0.0058644097,0.23948368,0.0006422657,0.00038897424,0.0000026257003,0.000040241808,0.026370354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89730936,0.00019710504,0.10097326,0.00048021605,0.0005469438,0.0000046615264,8.118218e-7,0.000007720774,0.00047992976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941994,0.0032582902,0.00040919104,0.00017308533,0.0015106923,0.00044934088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99068993,0.005028377,0.00025986356,0.00011892129,0.0031977124,0.0007051864],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023592742,0.00008607151,0.00023777911,0.00021929812,0.0003443603,0.00085402385,0.000320578,0.00008246424,0.00011153512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045540117,0.00005538632,0.000034320794,0.00051090133,0.00052824005,0.0011972995,0.0000808506,0.0008540201,0.000018588427],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010243439,0.00050268346,0.0125173805,0.000060046328,0.00006844913,0.00036037082,0.08851187,0.0000018690615,0.00019488964,0.82860845,0.00471679,0.06343285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012904262,0.0017342737,0.0047599874,0.0006390986,0.00004675393,0.00040838527,0.05828903,0.00009802492,0.00017538508,0.53027046,0.40197062,0.00031756418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020017116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000027777364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39725384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017406349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012093965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9624997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341200525","doi":"10.1177/1086296x15619257","title":"Advancing the Field of Literacy Studies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Field (mathematics); Mathematics education; Psychology; Sociology; Pedagogy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.20922054656049835,"score_gpt":0.5081244356853201,"score_spread":0.2989038891248217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341200525","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96958417,0.013562613,0.000013990614,0.010243071,0.0026902608,0.00013487475,0.000004795201,0.0000062210747,0.0037599956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98884827,0.00045585053,0.00032605155,0.000516755,0.0044624065,0.0000062037902,0.0000017277462,0.000012462851,0.0053702584],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754804,0.00039746566,0.0006972126,0.000103066624,0.0009291593,0.00032507456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909758,0.0030014585,0.00032884508,0.00026438868,0.005270728,0.00015876701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043730955,0.00010109575,0.000277256,0.00037697746,0.00024317436,0.00035850928,0.0004217989,0.00002913103,0.00030463014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041532847,0.00005663548,0.00011858372,0.00016125293,0.00024827904,0.00152472,0.00009182535,0.0006150882,0.000029353001],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014985388,0.00012297394,0.0017508484,0.0001117072,0.000073458,0.000016042803,0.8621635,0.0000029766225,0.000023066823,0.0017379434,0.11078603,0.02306164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053893076,0.00092570734,0.00036744116,0.00062702183,0.00002746265,0.00004235559,0.26070443,0.00005589738,0.00063712447,0.015770053,0.72019905,0.000104518644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009426062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020718113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.609413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008603746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034740972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49721697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2467139089","doi":"10.1177/1086296x16658982","title":"Riding the Lines and Overwriting in the Margins","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Pleasure; Sociology; Embodied cognition; Pride; Aesthetics; Pedagogy; Media studies; Psychology; Art; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.16123070191498254,"score_gpt":0.41190130223600585,"score_spread":0.2506706003210233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2467139089","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9758886,0.0013301085,0.0000033689548,0.019561993,0.00038492878,0.000076576674,0.0000031501004,0.0000018350079,0.0027494454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927111,0.00036686682,0.000027108466,0.00027134104,0.0041774195,0.0000045853594,3.603552e-7,0.0000061538635,0.0024350188],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856037,0.00038171237,0.00030619968,0.00006900514,0.00045602894,0.00022668383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967921,0.0024871032,0.00010176794,0.00012410225,0.000452886,0.00004204358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043136585,0.000055242697,0.000092401664,0.0002072815,0.00033667716,0.0006478222,0.00026913956,0.000016403,0.0002861487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076912175,0.000020343909,0.000040159895,0.00007905633,0.00019340742,0.00081600423,0.000036768924,0.00035657763,0.0000118271055],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052495096,0.00007002695,0.013326317,0.00003898909,0.000012187265,0.000023332957,0.9172101,1.2040823e-7,0.00015474208,0.011516198,0.012223438,0.04537207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000712029,0.00021721609,0.030613538,0.00094049453,0.00001000951,0.00014643243,0.24153994,0.000048038968,0.00012003091,0.012886884,0.71265966,0.00010571763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007490691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005170064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70043623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034145985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000078156794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62469643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2518396513","doi":"10.1177/1086296x16665323","title":"The Matter of New Media Making","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Sociology; Feeling; Dialectic; Literacy; Making-of; Digital media; Epistemology; Media studies; Pedagogy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.17161844690803577,"score_gpt":0.4162711903326787,"score_spread":0.2446527434246429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2518396513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97061586,0.0019876473,0.000028974715,0.017021025,0.0025177079,0.00008603834,0.000007186889,0.000003839527,0.007731741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97107494,0.00017423488,0.000116881114,0.00013450092,0.005381043,0.0000016364304,4.9687515e-7,0.0000115008725,0.023104744],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822664,0.00019383611,0.0005089806,0.00007238141,0.0007194424,0.00027873833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964397,0.001836976,0.00024228253,0.00020053839,0.0011746427,0.000105880164],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020076681,0.000065164124,0.00013802269,0.00024132205,0.00022362701,0.00033921335,0.00038666115,0.000023704526,0.0035782543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005941262,0.000028437755,0.000091952366,0.00006620831,0.00025124603,0.0007723895,0.000044921584,0.00025915765,0.00019340485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001685204,0.00006201755,0.006932151,0.000037513302,0.000039383336,0.000008304446,0.6215004,5.3403163e-8,0.00017994734,0.0058586276,0.24619712,0.119016014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044299426,0.00013707625,0.0076193567,0.0006157077,0.0000100187535,0.000028388344,0.02109347,0.000002144075,0.00041028298,0.022886535,0.9466843,0.00006974856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003817431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024008352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70048714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048704587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026673797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99733263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2569601954","doi":"10.1177/1086296x16675714","title":"Literacy “Turns”","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Literacy; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Sociology","score_opus":0.13595401837205462,"score_gpt":0.42681252005617853,"score_spread":0.2908585016841239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2569601954","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97420913,0.0023968183,0.00004151164,0.007575998,0.0034871479,0.00013632471,0.000020970336,0.000018758203,0.012113336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9509753,0.00036140392,0.0002755314,0.00025300542,0.009595585,0.000006759568,0.0000030435197,0.000024123168,0.038505245],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720526,0.00036896399,0.0007256988,0.00017219193,0.0010182514,0.0005096432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947359,0.0012155748,0.0002695707,0.00030878378,0.003186618,0.0002835399],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025269345,0.00013581393,0.00024912643,0.0007466069,0.0002526104,0.00092120527,0.00048758145,0.000049689428,0.006208334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008509714,0.00007415619,0.00017001918,0.00014210714,0.00028793272,0.0030526419,0.0000634425,0.0005028657,0.0005685079],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022307185,0.00030781544,0.0028384344,0.00010389549,0.0000583669,0.00007979302,0.744027,8.194019e-8,0.00038132418,0.010274934,0.072665654,0.1690396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068416895,0.0003668298,0.0013939015,0.00056095846,0.000010690666,0.00007920713,0.007909723,0.0000051804523,0.00030512124,0.015670987,0.9728823,0.000130959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000040217015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009779873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90021664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013982032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030379562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99470013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588890239","doi":"10.1177/1086296x16686279","title":"Interrupting and Disrupting Literacy Research","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Learning Partnership","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Psychology; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Sociology","score_opus":0.5469483983849375,"score_gpt":0.7368898550725346,"score_spread":0.1899414566875971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588890239","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91659325,0.00077050395,0.000008088076,0.013819142,0.00048350057,0.00014717985,0.000001913881,0.0000069497,0.06816948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98228645,0.00060236355,0.0012351301,0.00007671807,0.0031940127,0.0000035716287,4.081317e-7,0.000013757311,0.012587566],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950896,0.0017856039,0.00053782336,0.00019348165,0.0016451176,0.0007483561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99245036,0.002505355,0.00036508372,0.00040259468,0.0037636915,0.0005129034],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026117757,0.000085413456,0.00020669519,0.0007577769,0.004111138,0.0036684363,0.0010950086,0.00009430168,0.00029988796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026129354,0.000071909984,0.00008124768,0.0003361356,0.0010244066,0.0019346206,0.00036770268,0.0016643333,0.000047877882],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009887199,0.00012158255,0.039662484,0.000062812294,0.000020955036,0.000066837296,0.37501723,3.226669e-7,0.00058608496,0.008105786,0.0023844847,0.57387257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005802528,0.00020642429,0.038399342,0.0008208796,0.00000489936,0.00005169741,0.028163495,0.00021740672,0.0001824675,0.005593969,0.92562693,0.00015225817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027708218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011355309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92324245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018359163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008746798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99736583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612045435","doi":"10.1177/1086296x16637169","title":"Editorial","year":2016,"lang":"es","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Sociology","score_opus":0.046109347644780224,"score_gpt":0.4893775575471271,"score_spread":0.44326820990234683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612045435","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009983226,0.0038820296,0.00001277795,0.0008610515,0.9884511,0.00063636963,0.001898629,0.000032421012,0.0032272525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00070600654,0.004469453,0.00034437914,0.00000645739,0.980301,0.000019678726,0.00005885134,0.00070221064,0.013391954],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94845736,0.008950215,0.0050525353,0.0011178333,0.033037886,0.0033841697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8957609,0.030326031,0.004680483,0.0018855508,0.06527667,0.0020703706],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.055762254,0.0012072385,0.0028813032,0.0074431105,0.0008260692,0.0042172116,0.006295648,0.0037122653,0.002661807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07070339,0.0008306872,0.0018209107,0.0026835636,0.0014908327,0.0044489955,0.0015641224,0.02180264,0.022591624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012116171,0.0008602016,0.00017536758,0.0005664732,0.00097004994,0.0010372888,0.0011705613,8.177015e-7,0.008261715,0.000091586844,0.96695155,0.0077982266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006844732,0.00394584,0.000040867086,0.009540197,0.00018753916,0.00017457403,0.000071910516,0.0000032423613,0.00036915677,0.002232016,0.97580177,0.0007881699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006409771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002041945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052696463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004595332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015321695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616008473","doi":"10.1177/1086296x17706790","title":"Literacy Research in Uncertain Times","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Learning Partnership","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Literacy; Mathematics education; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.33890892565865743,"score_gpt":0.6369528463668515,"score_spread":0.298043920708194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616008473","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8060958,0.0030045193,0.0000025648144,0.035110958,0.00062014145,0.00022882195,0.0000035729574,0.0000053625513,0.15492831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98037434,0.0012901173,0.00043145972,0.000041949417,0.0018410651,0.000013975905,6.2373647e-7,0.000008976773,0.015997492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99325484,0.0030539634,0.00049659156,0.00019448188,0.0022470115,0.0007531378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991871,0.0034525495,0.00024356694,0.00039376804,0.0037961008,0.00024303174],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.033108346,0.00008621689,0.00023959292,0.0008091597,0.0032796492,0.0013010851,0.0015524946,0.00008713753,0.0005916519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008626049,0.00006899139,0.00010336221,0.00071280164,0.0012927265,0.0019497997,0.00027370095,0.0014875294,0.00013434343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005138833,0.0011811974,0.23499937,0.00011035748,0.00009116476,0.0006044574,0.25692734,0.0000085969305,0.00023952199,0.354295,0.043479286,0.107549846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005985796,0.00026243264,0.07204121,0.0008964424,0.0000041413464,0.000020444477,0.030181985,0.000018864492,0.00007459097,0.3492841,0.546457,0.00016017999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012140753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011713103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5029777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034138002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010514543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894852105","doi":"10.1177/1086296x18803134","title":"Toward a Model of Global Meaning Making","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Global Education and Multiculturalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of Sydney","keywords":"Sociology; Eclecticism; Indigenous; Meaning (existential); Reading (process); Racism; Decolonization; Critical theory; Cultural capital; Transformative learning; Epistemology; Citizenship; The Imaginary; Gender studies; Pedagogy; Social science; Politics; Political science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.28346569021353196,"score_gpt":0.5583878930108791,"score_spread":0.27492220279734714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894852105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90660846,0.00021138313,0.00017745212,0.005776741,0.00052367436,0.00009159892,0.0000047422523,0.000006395157,0.086599536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99239445,0.000042226966,0.006181391,0.00012227111,0.00062577485,6.122776e-7,1.514639e-7,0.0000025853287,0.00063056225],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979327,0.00031055068,0.00032850285,0.00007526875,0.0010672051,0.00028579426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99505466,0.00010728773,0.00018456067,0.00008165945,0.0044233454,0.0001484579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026520817,0.000045323224,0.00012698346,0.00008388811,0.00024588418,0.00014521976,0.0003847299,0.00004944379,0.00015363625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020546806,0.000034557805,0.000079365156,0.00053156156,0.00033677023,0.0004816013,0.00005553936,0.0002091325,0.00001855766],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002629175,0.00029199707,0.006147848,0.00005094112,0.0000683704,0.000020068957,0.77037567,0.00008647157,0.0032035743,0.16759986,0.027338628,0.024553658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002680796,0.0011539285,0.013083487,0.001922105,0.00006924657,0.00016029968,0.19677213,0.012883399,0.0016898215,0.09312372,0.67586094,0.0006001504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042226698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000094011884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6485223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025709785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062291074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2459793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001446865","doi":"10.1177/1086296x19898003","title":"Introducing Offlineness: Theorizing (Digital) Literacy Engagements","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Sociology; Construct (python library); Digital literacy; Literacy; Pedagogy; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.13548606769631166,"score_gpt":0.3922476850730654,"score_spread":0.25676161737675374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3001446865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98008436,0.001898355,0.00021854807,0.009330621,0.0022791685,0.00021372567,0.000032224216,0.00002995777,0.005913033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797207,0.00011388982,0.000542077,0.0008720685,0.015534682,0.000005917355,0.000022467486,0.000034657754,0.0031535157],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99685764,0.00040783847,0.00090207806,0.0002622845,0.0010719369,0.0004981988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956744,0.00092908985,0.00032638485,0.00026127725,0.0024575558,0.00035130433],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026021204,0.00017347357,0.00032300325,0.00050088647,0.0004840325,0.002940068,0.0005813094,0.000041565436,0.0017316297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002312378,0.000133007,0.00016729608,0.0002711942,0.00016807111,0.0044629374,0.000137697,0.0011470302,0.0002726781],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023902845,0.00019615311,0.0020229795,0.00021649727,0.000079660844,0.000061931954,0.88734454,0.000009069981,0.00017474458,0.0029638524,0.022965642,0.08372592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008405871,0.00055064703,0.00028456497,0.00045797136,0.000023780847,0.000031134838,0.068002276,0.0005007953,0.00034123258,0.0047755623,0.92396915,0.00022232014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023086368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000011508781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9010035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009634384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002559467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043304802","doi":"10.1177/1086296x20939559","title":"Dual-Language Books: Enhancing Engagement and Language Awareness","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Alberta Centre for Child, Family and Community Research","keywords":"Literacy; Metalinguistics; Heritage language; Psychology; Pedagogy; Language Experience Approach; Native-language instruction; Reading (process); Metalinguistic awareness; First language; Competence (human resources); Mathematics education; Linguistics; Teaching method; Language education; Comprehension approach; Vocabulary development","score_opus":0.22530634367536528,"score_gpt":0.5868874041755676,"score_spread":0.36158106050020233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043304802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9776131,0.001991525,0.000039585866,0.010113401,0.00016833839,0.000117256,0.0000030686574,0.000010992938,0.009942752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99357396,0.00027501193,0.00048746326,0.0008223012,0.002046035,0.0000021297262,8.779997e-7,0.000008405138,0.0027837954],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754333,0.00095895753,0.00031860807,0.000112811416,0.0007651146,0.00030114545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982733,0.000662261,0.00012020671,0.00008669467,0.0004475262,0.0004099803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042695235,0.00006236735,0.00014662743,0.00019219647,0.00040858315,0.00030040703,0.00021013412,0.000041385156,0.0006443931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032427758,0.000053045347,0.000048800182,0.00033989438,0.00012534062,0.0003361394,0.00007809644,0.00056119775,0.000029478095],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042411993,0.00004632824,0.0015254706,0.00005756055,0.000016177702,0.00009508412,0.9367358,0.0000011861885,0.008410408,0.0009935896,0.002426017,0.049649984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007782844,0.0002618202,0.0034112427,0.00021740593,0.000013466771,0.000019589743,0.37944907,0.0001311571,0.008082817,0.00017930461,0.6072684,0.00018744613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010588998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009728593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60484236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007023825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000715284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7055652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3188131395","doi":"10.1177/1086296x211031262","title":"Global Literacies Research Diversity: A Manifesto for Change","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Global Education and Multiculturalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Manifesto; Indigenous; Interrogation; Literacy; Globalization; Sociology; Diversity (politics); Dominance (genetics); Educational research; Gender studies; Social science; Political science; Pedagogy; Anthropology; Law","score_opus":0.47991969192954054,"score_gpt":0.602370602254926,"score_spread":0.12245091032538546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3188131395","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88976777,0.0048783617,0.000016511232,0.083092205,0.0019505941,0.00062505447,0.00006465991,0.00001741038,0.019587407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833264,0.00071384554,0.0017143288,0.00039377253,0.0023251404,0.00001766133,0.0000059594645,0.0000057892844,0.011497135],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952629,0.0014355885,0.00031252613,0.00018568283,0.0021151442,0.00068811345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837886,0.00092724396,0.000101524754,0.000168493,0.014609654,0.0004044583],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076530855,0.00007347699,0.0001795004,0.00025336572,0.0018630838,0.0007370033,0.0005947241,0.00009850095,0.00029436586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064123357,0.00006203832,0.00016284108,0.0015735542,0.0003401916,0.0010984794,0.000391031,0.00045118586,0.00004116251],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034111724,0.0007554158,0.018583814,0.00014719885,0.00010068906,0.0004993463,0.63106346,0.0000010543721,0.00024896997,0.06444905,0.24719004,0.036619827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042960042,0.0001210955,0.01183097,0.00013851954,0.0000074657737,0.00005899457,0.041109376,0.000007013469,0.0000393954,0.0058664824,0.9403174,0.00007371916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015424651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005406689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69312733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006205694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008502051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210853299","doi":"10.1177/1086296x221076431","title":"Leading Literate Lives: Afghan Refugee Children in a First-Asylum Country","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Education and experiences of immigrants and refugees","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Ethnography; Literacy; Reading (process); Afghan; Pedagogy; Psychology; Sociology; Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.03613378154286592,"score_gpt":0.4296844835535661,"score_spread":0.3935507020107002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210853299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98434055,0.0029988757,0.0000014091665,0.005784843,0.00057562353,0.00015251829,0.0000070914216,0.000007149604,0.0061319224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99099255,0.0009776399,0.00017041553,0.00028621135,0.0006933147,0.000016969378,0.0000032333999,0.000009708467,0.006849933],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964525,0.0009210668,0.0005029248,0.00016800781,0.0014357844,0.00051971525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987144,0.0003652855,0.00019609023,0.00013963415,0.00037720098,0.00020740018],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006120126,0.000083309744,0.0002097585,0.0007118443,0.0015209696,0.00044744645,0.0007268393,0.000039373677,0.0009661946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004935418,0.00006821991,0.000092394504,0.0013384577,0.00025700187,0.0007893738,0.00012460031,0.0010054376,0.000018086599],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042210805,0.0011499212,0.18808453,0.000044569857,0.00006750441,0.0002474444,0.7474835,0.00015579473,0.00028361037,0.009489744,0.02348863,0.029082654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047356702,0.00031035798,0.014069965,0.00016051046,0.0000028006882,0.000052887168,0.055550292,0.00002222663,0.000024279714,0.0008634169,0.92834175,0.00012797122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010373036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006024925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9048531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031741246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006060711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211155351","doi":"10.1177/1086296x221076436","title":"Student-Generated Questions in Literacy Education and Assessment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reading comprehension; Reading (process); Psychology; Literacy; Comprehension; Multilevel model; Grade level; Mathematics education; Quality (philosophy); Pedagogy; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.09354785950552523,"score_gpt":0.5629030605721215,"score_spread":0.46935520106659623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211155351","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96351445,0.0012603643,0.000021890604,0.024092373,0.0007542147,0.00016464916,0.0000015726637,0.0000055904643,0.010184869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98987794,0.00038389277,0.004668224,0.00041713085,0.0002675985,0.00003781548,0.0000032827645,0.000005110525,0.004338986],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962723,0.0017955436,0.00037601648,0.000108934684,0.0012128422,0.00023433326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982204,0.00044055958,0.0000806922,0.00007936079,0.0010081299,0.00017088636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073506534,0.000046028657,0.00010483524,0.0005590792,0.0007673751,0.0004028865,0.0002604083,0.0000225893,0.000686983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005062513,0.000044428303,0.000025559078,0.00087997294,0.00009420977,0.00044817667,0.00010450324,0.000845895,0.0000035112705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044405173,0.0035642134,0.23125489,0.00003195655,0.000030560008,0.00005331052,0.31003538,0.00002117544,0.00036973422,0.18982652,0.00934006,0.25542778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033940168,0.00016862252,0.21089664,0.00011230884,0.0000043199816,0.00002844668,0.04023558,0.000036157264,0.000009054724,0.02722385,0.72084904,0.00009658631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002472129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024796807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.711509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006831947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002898893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7521982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220847939","doi":"10.1177/1086296x221076610","title":"Categorization in Literacy Contexts: The Short-Term and Long-Term Effects of Labeling Students and Their Literacies","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Term (time); Literacy; Categorization; Psychology; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.09290683550672207,"score_gpt":0.5457878983125898,"score_spread":0.4528810628058677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220847939","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922221,0.005833236,0.000008009908,0.0011926234,0.0002613148,0.00032199765,0.0000048741476,0.00000311339,0.00015275585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974815,0.0014581366,0.000025271778,0.000116660034,0.0002581566,0.000014357493,0.0000026266625,0.000008494948,0.00063474884],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99663335,0.0016556003,0.0004857252,0.00013019913,0.00082217075,0.00027293744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968986,0.0020443415,0.00018762505,0.00012941418,0.00060951523,0.00013048865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004706471,0.00008681548,0.00020901153,0.0004708185,0.00058751035,0.00045520795,0.00043256555,0.000035426365,0.000058598995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010278182,0.000060109232,0.00004381468,0.0006295109,0.00024946776,0.00058407907,0.00021519109,0.00062211853,4.723604e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089807174,0.00020213946,0.48269656,0.000112348695,0.000021614278,0.000018473911,0.43336567,0.0000027002732,0.0012823226,0.000569095,0.000033345037,0.08160591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014290079,0.00053629,0.96316123,0.00064517383,0.000017019685,0.00006269893,0.020837434,0.00010635347,0.0007617759,0.0013829558,0.010870869,0.0001892141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027469563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000054150893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48046464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000112134505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002687512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45187142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225152770","doi":"10.1177/1086296x221096671","title":"<i>Éclosions</i> in Literacy Research: Rereading Brandt and Clinton’s “Limits of the Local”","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Dichotomy; Sociology; Perspective (graphical); Critical literacy; Extension (predicate logic); Media studies; Political science; Epistemology; Pedagogy; Philosophy; Art; Visual arts; Computer science","score_opus":0.2205947550451991,"score_gpt":0.4477736965969484,"score_spread":0.22717894155174928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225152770","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9878395,0.0033340768,0.000003078239,0.0041803354,0.0011720543,0.00029131107,0.000027594004,0.0000043629216,0.0031476577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929561,0.00037843245,0.00006711082,0.00021915189,0.0011165575,0.000027805367,0.0000051148213,0.000022895078,0.005206827],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99398214,0.0023264089,0.0009997312,0.00022685691,0.0019078398,0.00055700954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99440384,0.0027560259,0.00031035434,0.00038707725,0.001962211,0.0001805168],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011381385,0.00012455728,0.0003198417,0.00126609,0.0010766323,0.00050437177,0.0007302092,0.00004260885,0.0009970793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012035713,0.00008552307,0.00013346104,0.0006766819,0.0006619825,0.0011534108,0.00037895062,0.0023944695,0.00000813693],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005475115,0.0005676738,0.021478986,0.00023324825,0.000032502176,0.000052850126,0.9136658,0.000015541586,0.00038765758,0.005926837,0.021712309,0.035379086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018719247,0.0011085819,0.01245281,0.0013403927,0.000021369886,0.00020601825,0.17068279,0.00044969717,0.0009139803,0.024004245,0.7867058,0.00024240385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004972002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000837405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7649935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026912463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005367949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229368359","doi":"10.1177/1086296x221098068","title":"Private Readerly Experiences of Presence: Why They Matter","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Set (abstract data type); Mandate; Point (geometry); Sociology; Epistemology; Psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.09661324500492427,"score_gpt":0.3823237369909209,"score_spread":0.28571049198599663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229368359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909647,0.000802186,0.000003020457,0.0019533262,0.0018611087,0.000125416,0.000010704525,0.000004253553,0.004275269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99066526,0.00003604189,0.000125792,0.00026528205,0.0014993929,0.000040505198,0.0000048652337,0.000013165077,0.007349685],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99708104,0.0005467552,0.00060654973,0.00013007868,0.0013210647,0.00031448182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787503,0.0005555959,0.000313688,0.00023523586,0.00091261446,0.00010784189],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002257001,0.00008622882,0.00020544726,0.00050092494,0.00047850507,0.0003477246,0.0006112718,0.00001840358,0.014230938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020660598,0.0000631618,0.00010524479,0.00012960746,0.0002544879,0.0011192326,0.00013201933,0.0006427116,0.000027426728],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013012066,0.0002029826,0.0023216114,0.000060783765,0.00002213783,0.000015373795,0.9312777,0.0000028963723,0.00010277044,0.001297948,0.06296916,0.0015965231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023515153,0.0005539291,0.000645922,0.000097752236,0.000006630482,0.00004973483,0.61702377,0.00002270879,0.00032194032,0.005421979,0.3755381,0.0000823672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013645587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000045054576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31425393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006413742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019986312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9866702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254652524","doi":"10.1207/s15548430jlr3403_6","title":"Book Review","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Mathematics education; Sociology","score_opus":0.1799128003600174,"score_gpt":0.5044358625708032,"score_spread":0.3245230622107858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254652524","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016747745,0.9714418,0.0000040212194,0.010304831,0.00010613033,0.00021252617,0.00000410776,0.000027006854,0.016224824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021067409,0.7342987,0.002103239,0.025384719,0.0031206931,0.000023628761,0.0000023918378,0.00064804096,0.21335115],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950408,0.0010983467,0.0008919942,0.00014494272,0.0022575173,0.0005664541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99558127,0.0005758028,0.00033472947,0.00043641575,0.0027074595,0.0003643407],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069217472,0.000114053844,0.00038724433,0.0006946722,0.0000972392,0.00017337807,0.0007088508,0.000044505356,0.053205732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019239959,0.00008419792,0.00023144131,0.0011845885,0.00012625639,0.0014166823,0.00010229913,0.0014484352,0.034138594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036885653,0.00017799104,0.00018965545,0.00036802838,0.00003183169,0.0003524158,0.0003059842,4.7600238e-7,0.0007935055,0.000022957114,0.9908857,0.0068346034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040916225,0.00028607217,0.00020620054,0.004145957,0.0000148580675,0.00083645066,0.000008399034,0.00009587948,0.00020730757,0.0000724019,0.99363655,0.000080755264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001808412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.952967e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23714305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021291009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060644357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9666134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381512536","doi":"10.1177/1086296x231178513","title":"Theorizing Literacies as Affective Flows: Attuning to the Otherwise Possibilities of Hip-Hop's “In-the-Red Frequencies”","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Critical Race Theory in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Complicity; Sociology; Privilege (computing); Literacy; Oppression; Posthumanism; Hegemony; Aesthetics; Politics; Critical literacy; Humanism; Epistemology; Pedagogy; Law","score_opus":0.09831042212335046,"score_gpt":0.5176913601135695,"score_spread":0.4193809379902191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381512536","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9499617,0.00041830313,0.000028772834,0.04020704,0.00040517087,0.00042713908,0.000006186422,0.000013604891,0.008532064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968402,0.00010418761,0.0003347755,0.00019290573,0.00079611817,0.000025896219,7.6770795e-7,0.000014835294,0.0016903114],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99260473,0.0042104395,0.00057782844,0.00017295967,0.0018076496,0.00062638294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837326,0.01417095,0.0001569759,0.00036519248,0.0014223902,0.00015189887],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027622549,0.000107487445,0.00023918597,0.00070203195,0.00063728506,0.0004812414,0.0011812698,0.00006821732,0.00022719815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020104192,0.000066067216,0.00014697896,0.0026756232,0.00063468644,0.0007424349,0.00010936419,0.00082385645,0.00008487127],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017666089,0.000120642006,0.00079789467,0.000039845017,0.000020223206,0.000030322668,0.86036175,0.00008732652,0.003799114,0.12270475,0.0008991981,0.0109622525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018987307,0.0003901445,0.0030420066,0.00049585407,0.00000911694,0.000017423681,0.6075602,0.000055735854,0.0005414051,0.37142855,0.01617494,0.00009472043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007212696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041719896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25280154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003263141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058713777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9881499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388830929","doi":"10.1177/1086296x231215326","title":"Reading Rhetorically: Discussing the Ethics of Narrative Form","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Digital Storytelling and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Rhetorical question; Narratology; Reading (process); Narrative criticism; Narrative inquiry; Sociology; Pedagogy; Narrative network; Psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.372637943649505,"score_gpt":0.6150995211894381,"score_spread":0.24246157753993314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388830929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9414192,0.00023584421,0.00025909272,0.040303085,0.0017230698,0.00026799587,0.00000548298,0.000018967492,0.01576725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98651195,0.00022769945,0.00022757037,0.0000972954,0.00086347177,0.000007794825,0.0000030085087,0.00001392483,0.012047318],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99665034,0.0012324613,0.00067124254,0.00008288945,0.0009729577,0.0003901225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900639,0.007289635,0.00036976795,0.00018141705,0.001980822,0.00011447758],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014137348,0.000058389658,0.00017701348,0.00033358316,0.0010898345,0.00005283488,0.00030875247,0.00010854142,0.00006688254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058208522,0.000030797793,0.000081472164,0.0010295438,0.000116905605,0.00044112644,0.000098127886,0.0027099273,0.00007949267],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002331016,0.00011129951,0.01393026,0.00038451745,0.00005676369,0.000014828142,0.8761488,0.000027022526,0.0010751849,0.0053329603,0.07025143,0.032433793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007797905,0.00073464285,0.03804899,0.004763715,0.000021427084,0.000022266287,0.27792665,0.0007449538,0.00039035126,0.06943763,0.60694385,0.00018573827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004518153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000029444627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5982222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022926946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092597416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393316087","doi":"10.1177/1086296x241244682","title":"Temporal Seeing as Visual Literacy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Literacy; Visual literacy; Reading (process); Mathematics education; Cognitive psychology; Pedagogy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.09541842921386917,"score_gpt":0.46971158466631013,"score_spread":0.37429315545244096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393316087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97230035,0.008886543,0.000022080178,0.002870383,0.0051798155,0.00013749958,0.000010412868,0.000040561627,0.010552359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9559704,0.00017939282,0.00021787184,0.0002281273,0.012423769,0.000007804908,0.000018086941,0.000037943497,0.030916596],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969343,0.00035244235,0.00078492094,0.00022625769,0.0011855662,0.000516532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99666744,0.00094829727,0.00013687683,0.00019199874,0.0017759475,0.00027941773],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029886109,0.00016366677,0.0002614117,0.0011803531,0.00038552357,0.00393587,0.00036116826,0.000059234044,0.0046191267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044529702,0.000119812205,0.00021647474,0.0002904318,0.00020439149,0.003626219,0.00007328243,0.001200605,0.00083537144],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013520625,0.00023780097,0.0011734696,0.00036568302,0.00009181444,0.000515059,0.84599173,8.0846246e-7,0.000107967586,0.008325604,0.050619703,0.09243516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024381572,0.00055659283,0.00025504973,0.001076747,0.00001998923,0.00024515518,0.023576234,0.0005288338,0.00017723537,0.00950222,0.9636604,0.00015768793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018755853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008407068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91304076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016284116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069005496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408646447","doi":"10.1177/1086296x251318428","title":"Running Around in the Story: Un/Raveling Compositions of Narrative Play","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Narrative; Posthuman; Embodied cognition; Composition (language); Literacy; Sociology; Narrative inquiry; Story telling; Storytelling; Aesthetics; Dynamics (music); Psychology; Literature; Art; Epistemology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.09329834820966375,"score_gpt":0.4232288439977775,"score_spread":0.32993049578811373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408646447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98896456,0.001296947,0.00002750449,0.004330576,0.00067933946,0.00011962994,0.0000056996687,0.0000022054226,0.0045735687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973814,0.000043518718,0.00017057837,0.00019337035,0.00089567737,0.00000686531,0.00000586457,0.0000050589547,0.0012976563],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982396,0.00052422733,0.0004571592,0.00008039024,0.00049661763,0.00020205125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99726576,0.0013081647,0.00017128662,0.00014080561,0.0010759613,0.00003804104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032738654,0.00006899973,0.00017552325,0.00069478067,0.0004833075,0.00034227973,0.0003185099,0.000026773552,0.00022047944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026537984,0.000045005392,0.00007315103,0.00023970308,0.0002087689,0.0006178555,0.00002794184,0.0008334474,0.000004661687],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075068885,0.0001938311,0.0017522764,0.000053986692,0.000035584773,0.000011836625,0.97923297,0.000015447276,0.00013261403,0.011757352,0.00454107,0.0021979904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068833964,0.00027451923,0.007903351,0.0011034111,0.000020292626,0.000019825782,0.9065639,0.0002236118,0.00033653737,0.01192176,0.07086079,0.0000836983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009086293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003403545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072669074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008681371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030848378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37172595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416943947","doi":"10.1177/1086296x251401121","title":"Reading and Equity in Teacher Education: An Exploratory Study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Literacy Research","topic":"Critical Race Theory in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University; University of British Columbia; University of Saskatchewan; Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Equity (law); Reading (process); Exploratory research; Nexus (standard); Qualitative research; Educational equity; Teacher education; Higher education","score_opus":0.15403921435615098,"score_gpt":0.6227238681979511,"score_spread":0.46868465384180014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416943947","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9737116,0.00040753145,0.000011914703,0.0053087478,0.00034359278,0.00018912321,1.7007146e-7,0.000003989975,0.02002329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963063,0.00006733305,0.0001659714,0.000064638436,0.00043460238,0.000010776982,1.8314009e-7,0.0000037312725,0.0029464762],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99642736,0.002309585,0.0003125593,0.00011482922,0.0005987042,0.0002369515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791735,0.00085475313,0.000051501607,0.00013988296,0.00087758387,0.00015891064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016158657,0.000043135024,0.00011661842,0.0005854769,0.00027581566,0.0003227038,0.00029713608,0.000041958912,0.00012260387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004362289,0.00004014447,0.00001709555,0.0007695234,0.00021417966,0.001155341,0.00009259123,0.00057529,0.00000428149],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012689341,0.0031547984,0.11871963,0.00003321531,0.000009466126,0.000013831041,0.536255,7.9966674e-7,0.0003558764,0.0704307,0.0009759056,0.2699239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030989977,0.0002599317,0.064274974,0.00026794936,0.000007862107,0.0000027626834,0.7897574,0.000012046598,0.000033901924,0.128185,0.016820809,0.00006747994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001758939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048792336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26985642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004197274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017368752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}