{"meta":{"query_hash":"cb235211cb08","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics"},"cohort_total":39,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":39,"exported":39,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/cb235211cb08","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Mathematical+Economics"},"results":[{"id":"W1537982990","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2015.08.002","title":"Centralized allocation in multiple markets","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond","keywords":"Lexicographical order; Class (philosophy); Pareto efficiency; Pareto principle; Domain (mathematical analysis); Mathematical economics; Object (grammar); Preference; Economics; Characterization (materials science); Microeconomics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07626212296768375,"score_gpt":0.24154481937529573,"score_spread":0.16528269640761198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1537982990","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97939515,0.00026087364,0.005169346,0.0005425674,0.00044589138,0.000105762774,0.0000068040977,0.0000070199258,0.014066579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99651617,0.000040277493,0.0029679884,0.00007429386,0.00012214278,0.0000022294064,8.9334395e-7,0.000014887345,0.00026112542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983457,0.000033870252,0.0013031034,0.00011220855,0.000024162193,0.00018098103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864864,0.00020419138,0.00080014643,0.0001558318,0.00004056411,0.00015060794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003214357,0.00009588768,0.0005089106,0.00018377016,0.000015141332,0.000046271576,0.0002104362,0.00008199863,0.00013375522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011120246,0.00009798162,0.000112328395,0.00006990288,0.000033881635,0.0002587492,0.000023715966,0.00014960644,0.00035809592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022591885,0.00038771358,0.025149807,0.00009082265,0.000069041904,0.000011380303,0.0017958683,0.001554348,0.000015725831,0.9693523,0.00078760466,0.0005594829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003165137,0.000108875836,0.004165788,0.00010377929,0.000007660681,0.00012588904,0.00055303704,0.026474375,0.00011924475,0.95507526,0.00986734,0.000233617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000582459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004162025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024920026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018846875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037606835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46027178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541257362","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2016.01.003","title":"Volume of trade and dynamic network formation in two-sided economies","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Stylized fact; Pairwise comparison; Economics; Matching (statistics); Population; Shock (circulatory); Stability (learning theory); Microeconomics; Econometrics; Economy; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.044887382889535345,"score_gpt":0.3321596460919777,"score_spread":0.2872722632024423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541257362","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97508407,0.000034222543,0.02050283,0.00284213,0.000038166003,0.000070234535,0.000004243608,0.0000021089093,0.0014219694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957695,0.00006410528,0.0039514247,0.00004822872,0.000037809103,0.0000017765014,1.0286783e-7,0.0000046514715,0.00012242896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837357,0.0000574435,0.0012819634,0.00008810867,0.00008408348,0.000114854454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99692756,0.0019883434,0.0007956254,0.00017935409,0.000037565987,0.00007157489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002513086,0.00006886581,0.00037316806,0.00012641212,0.000024509776,0.00004140901,0.00026663518,0.000034082932,0.00020840626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007536463,0.000041811425,0.00008547395,0.00007325901,0.0001225265,0.000521485,0.00003932595,0.000067947956,0.00005165225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002075983,0.00024320319,0.0035976311,0.00004110508,0.00005421247,0.0000035813196,0.001556521,0.006340779,0.0016869728,0.8711748,0.0015914488,0.11350213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005408436,0.000043001135,0.004253128,0.00006671409,0.000008591695,0.00008933187,0.00029079197,0.014003625,0.00026700713,0.97990066,0.0004802079,0.000056088888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":2.6429754e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013898032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11344604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048304617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002672742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22819024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981826574","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2010.05.004","title":"Options and efficiency in spaces of bounded claims","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Stochastic processes and financial applications","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bounded function; Separable space; Space (punctuation); Injective function; Mathematics; Duality (order theory); Mathematical economics; Norm (philosophy); State space; Pure mathematics; Function (biology); Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Mathematical analysis; Statistics; Political science","score_opus":0.019042687181018276,"score_gpt":0.23099258969627076,"score_spread":0.21194990251525248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981826574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87528753,0.00026346603,0.12022124,0.00065292855,0.00012372111,0.000077760735,0.000017174149,0.000002413189,0.0033537347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976823,0.00013917929,0.022914115,0.000028400904,0.00006131517,0.0000040024247,3.0930306e-7,0.0000080155,0.000021713993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890274,0.0000012988232,0.00086740096,0.00010081036,0.000015863145,0.00011189713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990375,0.00013311866,0.0006046241,0.00012376178,0.000036354628,0.00006463414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005861393,0.00007000711,0.0003806608,0.00017772001,0.000029327168,0.00003295986,0.00015970638,0.00007677438,0.000067841065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024284486,0.0000705209,0.00006819882,0.00009930141,0.00011670438,0.00013219324,0.00003053429,0.0001982824,0.000023423727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006185366,0.00013274021,0.00073852984,0.000030712115,0.000007323152,3.838999e-7,0.00018428957,0.000027569882,0.000069452195,0.998458,0.000006461085,0.00033829894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032960522,0.0000574926,0.0034955868,0.000016775399,0.0000048921315,0.000036632795,0.000075316384,0.0034198514,0.000062796236,0.9917267,0.0006993736,0.00007495817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006473039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014643925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10153539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019801724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003747034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2875759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989193531","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2012.06.002","title":"Price and quality decisions under network effects","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Digital Platforms and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Incentive; Economics; Microeconomics; Monopoly; Marginal cost; Optimism","score_opus":0.044321102726370555,"score_gpt":0.24806938376222923,"score_spread":0.20374828103585868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989193531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9672124,0.00011008054,0.0041903607,0.00018044066,0.00039354278,0.00006631609,3.2904404e-7,0.000008344736,0.027838215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937684,0.000040767205,0.0031538992,0.0013939356,0.0015738761,9.305999e-7,7.0190947e-7,0.000016061065,0.000051420022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904865,0.0000013517392,0.0005805472,0.0000666583,0.00005080765,0.00025200634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987835,0.000513128,0.0005002711,0.00010843722,0.000039877366,0.000054737786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001122895,0.00010774435,0.00033751584,0.0000644985,0.00006312909,0.00038023607,0.0001264825,0.00005835079,0.00007614943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003486988,0.000083878316,0.00010307171,0.000047569927,0.000036687277,0.0038573442,0.00011670986,0.000116445815,0.00019968735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036389898,0.00011984126,0.0025441411,0.00010196293,0.000053748245,6.848291e-7,0.000020245256,0.0004885625,0.0000036120716,0.9916793,0.0008603518,0.004091168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005507275,0.000016327032,0.018178128,0.0000892678,0.00005790902,0.000037428745,0.00023306048,0.0018302844,0.000006252868,0.9689868,0.009811951,0.00020186871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000020273496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000028344814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027786795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003450581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011800945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36666253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993299296","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2013.04.003","title":"On refutability of the Nash bargaining solution","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Bargaining problem; Economics; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Subgame; Nash equilibrium; Epsilon-equilibrium; Best response","score_opus":0.028164037395038904,"score_gpt":0.26955963496009033,"score_spread":0.24139559756505144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993299296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9688973,0.000012047144,0.0015708646,0.001142039,0.00027130055,0.00011174543,0.0000018326297,0.000004002391,0.027988903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99723524,0.000040274906,0.0023022525,0.0001752241,0.000111476234,0.0000011241756,8.096004e-8,0.0000058339115,0.000128483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990146,0.00009538901,0.0005202873,0.00006443626,0.00014940528,0.00015583725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987693,0.00040572524,0.00042746527,0.0001576422,0.00015185274,0.00008801516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013353865,0.000063453976,0.00021892201,0.000031673233,0.00012885345,0.00003741225,0.00029739944,0.000083480714,0.00020554394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00087361754,0.000042740794,0.00015352687,0.00006129276,0.00020840706,0.00017286194,0.000034473785,0.00017758324,0.00003066987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014167402,0.00026238838,0.004582769,0.000038412756,0.00005076142,3.3286716e-7,0.009549177,0.000814113,0.00020841282,0.9809785,0.00075028534,0.0027506866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024569605,0.000080091646,0.013840686,0.0000564117,0.000022476015,0.00000438075,0.0063919006,0.0051416014,0.000061043924,0.97374153,0.00032845576,0.000085743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027500491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024718065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028337985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015189208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018064724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2250562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994622582","doi":"10.1016/s0304-4068(01)00060-x","title":"Rank-dependent preferences without ranking axioms","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Ranking (information retrieval); Mathematical economics; Weighting; Rank (graph theory); Dual (grammatical number); Function (biology); Set (abstract data type); Outcome (game theory); Expected utility hypothesis; Mathematics; Axiomatic system; Property (philosophy); Computer science; Decision theory; Combinatorics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.16462797547617009,"score_gpt":0.3913393237749928,"score_spread":0.22671134829882272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994622582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9655909,0.00007839949,0.022254918,0.0007737049,0.0008228963,0.00010769802,0.000004943168,0.000014892978,0.010351683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920705,0.00014968465,0.0066571375,0.0002072272,0.000305475,0.000001934809,3.018283e-7,0.000021828862,0.0005859171],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99604005,0.0001042121,0.0025674684,0.00032966497,0.00063264294,0.00032597137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952081,0.0019461235,0.0016463081,0.0005577355,0.00035215294,0.00028959673],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060951975,0.00022774232,0.00096707616,0.00041720748,0.00012254293,0.0006837117,0.0013970189,0.00015378284,0.0021656642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024032579,0.0001533251,0.00042157885,0.00018850838,0.00013475138,0.0008171327,0.0001658547,0.00036650102,0.0009818341],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000510342,0.00066206726,0.008892913,0.000013298181,0.00012286333,0.00011491011,0.0011962132,0.0034664539,0.00015418942,0.012208439,0.0013226917,0.9713356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010429232,0.00021226563,0.00072602916,0.000091150934,0.000060517497,0.0011368145,0.0010457793,0.006195404,0.00016854987,0.98238766,0.0066699795,0.00026294065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002687975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001143677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9710727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012587599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016301643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028553491","doi":"10.1016/s0304-4068(99)00044-0","title":"A note on ordinally equivalent Pareto surfaces","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Pareto principle; Corollary; Surface (topology); Transformation (genetics); Set (abstract data type); Monotone polygon; Preference; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Pure mathematics; Geometry; Chemistry; Statistics","score_opus":0.03604073082717639,"score_gpt":0.23878914217537556,"score_spread":0.20274841134819915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028553491","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8733159,0.00028232692,0.0026747358,0.0016869376,0.00034713387,0.00011543801,0.000059970025,0.000013783341,0.12150382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913883,0.0008935381,0.0040677837,0.00058394385,0.00030672908,0.0000036703323,0.0000014382452,0.00004267838,0.0027119063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977387,0.000013269745,0.0016419658,0.00024638313,0.00003126005,0.0003283905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983644,0.00023892392,0.00080776116,0.00034744354,0.000032829008,0.00020868184],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011889668,0.00020960488,0.0008439281,0.00014627288,0.000068344154,0.00011376586,0.00042757115,0.00012352888,0.005966499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000118276184,0.00020507228,0.00035535666,0.00005169724,0.00008289519,0.0003338953,0.000035260975,0.0002602213,0.0023635658],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017802694,0.00025117234,0.00021450018,0.000041700194,0.000118179996,0.000010396861,0.00041110735,0.009804198,0.0000047192957,0.98288536,0.0009525898,0.005128043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009897606,0.0004416649,0.0002853995,0.00006945686,0.00001864708,0.000098418284,0.00008057665,0.009571333,0.00008550776,0.9138709,0.074158356,0.00033000144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000049967434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000029926578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.118791915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020572716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004533916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046426498","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2013.11.005","title":"The geometry of revealed preference","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Preference relation; Dimension (graph theory); Space (punctuation); Relation (database); Irrational number; Revealed preference; Mathematics; Consumption (sociology); Set (abstract data type); Binary relation; Mathematical economics; Finite set; Pure mathematics; Geometry; Econometrics; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.05799301617180113,"score_gpt":0.31267366977119015,"score_spread":0.254680653599389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046426498","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96789956,0.00022886255,0.00004865363,0.0017555931,0.00018731815,0.00015282874,0.000001421245,0.0000038973303,0.02972187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956603,0.0008438795,0.002723612,0.000049444305,0.000099893194,0.0000063230086,6.4098884e-8,0.000007328038,0.00060915115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890995,0.00004588066,0.0007107769,0.000061010236,0.000093535076,0.00017885434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841857,0.0005887906,0.00061057706,0.00013277677,0.00014695858,0.00010230853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009986104,0.00007136314,0.00029091784,0.00004221253,0.00018566799,0.00007552561,0.00040648688,0.00005286039,0.00031649193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004202635,0.000048589016,0.00012796118,0.000049343405,0.0004115473,0.00028335318,0.00006912265,0.00012373783,0.000096147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004811283,0.00042280415,0.007403465,0.000057876023,0.0002256331,0.0000023254843,0.011867434,0.000035189652,0.001034934,0.9560065,0.0058210064,0.017074712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009213437,0.00039625293,0.007826915,0.00015384084,0.000089952206,0.000024989802,0.0363207,0.00024277369,0.003170709,0.9392684,0.011207537,0.0003765545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000053715354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034378827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029112719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013483208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001035943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34653646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067563274","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2011.07.006","title":"Cardinal versus ordinal criteria in choice under risk with disconnected utility ranges","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Irrational number; Mathematical economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Mathematics; Range (aeronautics); Subjective expected utility; Outcome (game theory); Certainty; Expected value; Preference; Function (biology); Econometrics; Statistics","score_opus":0.28101133384067,"score_gpt":0.4006125456551103,"score_spread":0.11960121181444028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067563274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98970854,0.000025891048,0.0031003072,0.0002096809,0.0006197969,0.00012343776,0.000020562964,0.000012094698,0.0061796927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98187673,0.000021016484,0.017869977,0.00003731084,0.00013333267,0.0000032861635,4.1371217e-7,0.000019160132,0.00003874286],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971166,0.00017895,0.0017152864,0.00034901916,0.0003309425,0.0003091939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950343,0.0027766326,0.0011405919,0.00054159627,0.00026170618,0.00024518085],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038141967,0.00022650033,0.00090106484,0.00035431763,0.00007735048,0.00024491647,0.00083862577,0.00012980387,0.001809531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025389055,0.000147394,0.0002718524,0.0002339499,0.00021041486,0.00072535686,0.000120112716,0.00044391846,0.00015250292],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02272162,0.0065382645,0.12416308,0.00007634786,0.00081936765,0.00061042985,0.0065174405,0.0025381292,0.00009857306,0.018501362,0.0050901226,0.81232524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0065642535,0.0019653873,0.15577637,0.00017497918,0.00025789766,0.00051139103,0.003909972,0.0128361555,0.00020883286,0.81490993,0.0022361458,0.0006487154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029566172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018659339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81167656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014721332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016547363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99910295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094786392","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2007.05.004","title":"Weakened WARP and top-cycle choice rules","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Mathematics; Tournament; Transitive relation; Context (archaeology); Simple (philosophy); Finite set; Transitive closure; Set (abstract data type); Closure (psychology); Mathematical economics; Combinatorics; Axiom of choice; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Set theory; Economics; Geometry","score_opus":0.024854315058667042,"score_gpt":0.23501538092675447,"score_spread":0.21016106586808744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094786392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9641663,0.00053940766,0.010014276,0.00037515082,0.00032712676,0.00006888198,0.000010510315,0.000010214382,0.024488164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942139,0.00008728272,0.004735909,0.00015106969,0.00036553826,6.92946e-7,4.4565436e-7,0.00002080337,0.0004243597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828666,0.000011610176,0.0012938925,0.00014558973,0.000023006594,0.00023921102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825066,0.00050302094,0.0008701247,0.00017407957,0.00003033292,0.00017175835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031664753,0.00012482282,0.0005643929,0.00017460372,0.000057573747,0.00007653952,0.00020161014,0.00010567544,0.00021931213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004893316,0.00012250707,0.00013842131,0.00004521062,0.000072665294,0.0002455039,0.000041503346,0.00018671321,0.00027481111],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003751639,0.000109549626,0.0063344496,0.00009068532,0.000086231485,0.000006500011,0.0005000842,0.000051607665,0.000026698248,0.99084926,0.00011011603,0.0017973012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009498604,0.00015612185,0.008050605,0.00008087517,0.000017916313,0.00028293385,0.00029331175,0.0017277723,0.00026244833,0.97092825,0.016992528,0.00025736555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000049170962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000032611642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03004763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006752398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000129835025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49956933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101674550","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2007.12.003","title":"A limit theorem for systems of social interactions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Convergence (economics); Mathematical economics; Homogeneity (statistics); Limit (mathematics); Mathematics; Class (philosophy); Computer science; Economics; Mathematical analysis; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1394832372931899,"score_gpt":0.4100161867334114,"score_spread":0.2705329494402215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101674550","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6349123,0.000013254605,0.3519385,0.00072396005,0.00023626795,0.0001348993,0.000014881071,0.0000033367087,0.012022615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935787,0.0000021091535,0.0055424133,0.000039578703,0.0002503333,0.000002924498,2.1419821e-7,0.0000066764596,0.0005770631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827176,0.000032338983,0.0013584556,0.000078606325,0.0001455375,0.00011328199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99365294,0.004694457,0.0010880955,0.00015705054,0.00033184997,0.0000755843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006154604,0.00006173088,0.00035970472,0.00015242986,0.00006908593,0.00006492287,0.00040120204,0.000045271776,0.0001782856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015331531,0.000043140055,0.0002588712,0.0000947217,0.00009935757,0.00017149573,0.000028485554,0.00010346848,0.000056744797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008245722,0.00012522958,0.000014575258,0.000012540185,0.00003110228,2.931953e-7,0.00059164845,0.00015592069,0.00033269866,0.99422455,0.0009547744,0.0034742197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028866038,0.00007571095,0.00015761254,0.000019678344,0.000032443688,0.00008149157,0.0036904402,0.002337615,0.00096796284,0.9760397,0.016252117,0.000056538855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":1.5669166e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001300481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3586664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037099548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004564128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21330751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131258498","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2006.04.010","title":"Inter-temporal preference for flexibility and risky choice","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Flexibility (engineering); Preference; Mathematical economics; Normative; Consistency (knowledge bases); Ex-ante; Representation (politics); Key (lock); Subjective expected utility; Time consistency; Econometrics; Economics; Revealed preference; Expected utility hypothesis; Computer science; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence; Actuarial science","score_opus":0.22270796674666915,"score_gpt":0.4046448403129322,"score_spread":0.18193687356626304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131258498","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.963925,0.000046447196,0.033699386,0.0005060142,0.00031319686,0.00014495192,0.000025537382,0.000007762309,0.001331711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9709014,0.000009232002,0.028419446,0.00008020574,0.00023973816,0.0000030763372,7.8312553e-7,0.000012845164,0.00033323493],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737984,0.000046481815,0.0018978694,0.00028760592,0.00018740221,0.0002008093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99458444,0.003468842,0.0011147263,0.00037987425,0.00029898563,0.00015312278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040291166,0.00015391027,0.0006462622,0.00017470028,0.000079857826,0.0004091416,0.0005903127,0.000111527945,0.00018819654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029279564,0.00010848272,0.0002603086,0.00007282127,0.00014665931,0.000521702,0.00011996538,0.00018429803,0.000060561615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065650523,0.0014268133,0.042052858,0.000093100396,0.000080614256,0.000012079194,0.00043184232,0.001587615,0.00017358852,0.051241487,0.020135896,0.8821076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059211324,0.00020606344,0.0028441756,0.000035363748,0.000027838772,0.00007762848,0.00013142046,0.00873534,0.00010818047,0.97253615,0.014568325,0.00013739476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008544344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004051556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9212947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008540214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009226452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4423797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336900194","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2016.09.001","title":"Voting over selfishly optimal nonlinear income tax schedules with a minimum-utility constraint","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Condorcet method; Pairwise comparison; Microeconomics; Voting; Incentive compatibility; Income tax; Mathematical economics; Private information retrieval; Schedule; Incentive; Mathematical optimization; Econometrics; Mathematics; Public economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.025449477664725138,"score_gpt":0.22422245668476096,"score_spread":0.19877297902003582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336900194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96755606,0.00008320926,0.0185335,0.0020544424,0.0001810314,0.00013641758,0.00020015593,0.000017661752,0.01123754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97050303,0.0000247279,0.028601306,0.00025273152,0.00047448234,0.0000039498077,9.417079e-7,0.00004174129,0.00009707705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972324,0.00001927502,0.0019191636,0.0003286226,0.000042739728,0.00045784298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99735606,0.0004590674,0.0015050933,0.0003158222,0.000059261256,0.00030467616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014344908,0.0002760525,0.0010143494,0.00023590044,0.00008118656,0.000109889384,0.00042854692,0.00017933537,0.0006936112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046007676,0.00020444933,0.00028706476,0.00007336482,0.000335423,0.00066713523,0.00009617004,0.00028653195,0.00039345617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025043447,0.00040089048,0.04210429,0.00016055313,0.00043343919,0.000023174547,0.00028087848,0.00008826991,0.000029616278,0.9544453,0.00030869906,0.0014744764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0068292217,0.0009352692,0.023411624,0.0005353647,0.00008073305,0.0006765294,0.0003183874,0.032112483,0.0006928889,0.92692435,0.0062995814,0.0011835792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000037279108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004833076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032024212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022435533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009938125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83372015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2472594781","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2017.02.003","title":"The consumption–investment decision of a prospect theory household: A two-period model","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Consumption (sociology); Loss aversion; Endowment effect; Portfolio; Endowment; Prospect theory; Asset (computer security); Autonomous consumption; Microeconomics; Investment (military); Value (mathematics); Expected utility hypothesis; Risk aversion (psychology); Public economics; Financial economics","score_opus":0.03510239654338768,"score_gpt":0.2636981760496703,"score_spread":0.2285957795062826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2472594781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99296194,0.00010195721,0.0028882772,0.00031985837,0.00017141916,0.00017417796,0.0000027792216,0.000008341418,0.003371226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908984,0.000086912485,0.008114425,0.00032972114,0.0003497838,0.0000046726827,7.0728004e-7,0.000024939767,0.0001904646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984554,0.000010602495,0.0009962013,0.00013242505,0.00021840863,0.00018694127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99699235,0.00022239266,0.0019868356,0.00055934355,0.00021356888,0.000025529884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002010464,0.00015554536,0.0004550513,0.00013260733,0.00043867965,0.00054525625,0.0006776192,0.00004921057,0.00011565001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009969763,0.00009968637,0.00030339547,0.000038248294,0.00023263229,0.0009211401,0.0002251681,0.00014709399,0.000072865354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024507425,0.00017854052,0.012620491,0.00010496622,0.00006296042,0.000006575382,0.00008335275,0.0021886043,0.000082387836,0.98213977,0.00063125265,0.0016560061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009375242,0.000022134247,0.005947005,0.00021563965,0.00022315001,0.000014563818,0.000053362546,0.11941553,0.00007431283,0.871914,0.0010343845,0.00014833694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000040573855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016034326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11722693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062273604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005717687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5257919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767914980","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2017.09.004","title":"Sticky prices in a dynamic network economy: A family of counterexamples","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Counterexample; Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.0406645709782539,"score_gpt":0.24665732789642952,"score_spread":0.20599275691817562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767914980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9404254,0.0009494462,0.012973929,0.00053530093,0.00045828108,0.00016250664,0.000059141224,0.000004870144,0.044431124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902517,0.00069345563,0.008609307,0.00011855222,0.00015833006,0.00000459417,0.0000010729374,0.000030857424,0.00013209754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972048,0.000008015269,0.002210637,0.0002292849,0.000018180921,0.0003290811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955664,0.00026486427,0.0034109193,0.0005874093,0.000051187988,0.000119185155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018630078,0.00019150676,0.0012186456,0.00019020692,0.00009065218,0.00017738825,0.00083358644,0.0001330612,0.00021347322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029180304,0.00020221193,0.00028021928,0.00002863319,0.00020167939,0.000705917,0.00015012702,0.00022910177,0.00007741465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070891154,0.0001334141,0.004226581,0.00011516375,0.00012363729,0.000005203358,0.0003613443,0.003102751,0.000004543591,0.99121004,0.00012521679,0.00052121386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010486332,0.00012749297,0.0073694633,0.00013214863,0.000015201412,0.000028409746,0.00020509036,0.021784414,0.000010405123,0.9643448,0.0047137584,0.00022017474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032488413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000050686285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04982633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020436924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008767901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82459635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904656709","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2018.11.002","title":"The finite horizon, undiscounted, durable goods monopoly problem with finitely many consumers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Digital Platforms and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Monopoly; Discounting; Durable good; Subgame perfect equilibrium; Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Horizon; Nash equilibrium; Mathematics","score_opus":0.015407173315655665,"score_gpt":0.20478657797754904,"score_spread":0.18937940466189337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904656709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8615653,0.000040360093,0.0023683244,0.0011618137,0.00034771962,0.00018618262,0.000003501046,0.000022507871,0.1343043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946486,0.00008488813,0.0026505191,0.00080003723,0.0010321136,0.0000055561554,0.0000027931692,0.00005429026,0.00072119856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985571,0.0000015034318,0.0008334045,0.00014615608,0.000102670805,0.00035917782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99833685,0.0002718013,0.000938032,0.00023586245,0.0001724314,0.000045003602],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007513466,0.00020577108,0.00037663744,0.00012087895,0.00027081516,0.0015707623,0.0004381965,0.000069535985,0.00017714413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013375538,0.00012435627,0.00013463393,0.00011288978,0.0003117871,0.0033848707,0.00010209709,0.0002062666,0.00069512153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050491386,0.00020012514,0.00084455754,0.00017996231,0.0003676446,0.000016201773,0.000084859756,0.0005568198,0.000009742707,0.98127437,0.005635617,0.010325213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017785361,0.00044950633,0.00020979295,0.00023699616,0.00019106199,0.00015816434,0.0025999174,0.028503222,0.00007237749,0.8204831,0.1447569,0.0005604194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012124908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000068680485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16079123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006812445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007903432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910907529","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2019.10.003","title":"The consumption–investment decision of a prospect theory household: A two-period model with an endogenous second period reference level","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"Austrian Science Fund","keywords":"Period (music); Economics; Consumption (sociology); Investment (military); Econometrics; Microeconomics; Political science","score_opus":0.09615015839859035,"score_gpt":0.24280358487857348,"score_spread":0.14665342647998314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910907529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9589084,0.00023434528,0.00902977,0.00008762313,0.00017623446,0.000338629,0.00011548872,0.000011610948,0.031097949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97185856,0.0003489436,0.027088864,0.00013103399,0.00006495801,0.000010149625,0.0000024224075,0.000059274575,0.0004358185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975069,0.000033363962,0.0017191743,0.0003184794,0.00006308544,0.00035896365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99702317,0.00037956377,0.0016476577,0.00067027006,0.00008249514,0.00019684527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002564732,0.0002604238,0.0009302534,0.00018264468,0.00015003783,0.00021692376,0.0006012097,0.00012173185,0.00062622054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012759039,0.00019806111,0.00021041058,0.000051861152,0.00022100314,0.00052016316,0.00008615164,0.0003271163,0.00020366826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00094963337,0.0004179749,0.0029254335,0.00014141476,0.00025958734,0.000008067558,0.0017259782,0.012542488,0.0000922085,0.978703,0.00005220869,0.0021820008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030861765,0.0008768844,0.00081683457,0.00013531688,0.00005307291,0.00067150284,0.0006203302,0.077332824,0.00022668991,0.9141848,0.0014957554,0.0004997901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000025875404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035127458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06479034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026458586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020134129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80766976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914842256","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2019.01.003","title":"Adaptive stochastic search","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Satisficing; Preference; Maximization; Mathematical optimization; Set (abstract data type); Mathematics; Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Econometrics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1082013021968553,"score_gpt":0.2259863795796958,"score_spread":0.11778507738284051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914842256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9488072,0.0001857616,0.02892387,0.00030155212,0.00031378787,0.00014281856,0.000015506044,0.0000049306004,0.021304592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99490184,0.000053198288,0.003943838,0.00014013083,0.00011245727,0.0000017781604,0.0000011840673,0.000021970709,0.0008235849],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986289,0.00000943566,0.0009865314,0.00016035729,0.000027349335,0.00018738717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989595,0.00013591156,0.00058395276,0.00019366041,0.00001654289,0.00011046528],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001000812,0.00011283617,0.00049942767,0.00014358759,0.00002595274,0.0000384957,0.00022051422,0.000079111865,0.0033926854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052476524,0.000118553515,0.00018561367,0.000036388188,0.000048744852,0.00035162247,0.00005113977,0.00019160779,0.0070650387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065505235,0.00024994728,0.0117450105,0.000047567362,0.00019419147,0.0000022050642,0.00064810464,0.03839898,0.000026481592,0.9473357,0.00029268084,0.0009936055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024245877,0.0007388163,0.019155705,0.00007862705,0.000029735509,0.00015893094,0.0010055054,0.12530199,0.00015345532,0.84936213,0.0010752464,0.0005152589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000023699756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.5661813e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097973585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025186912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025801359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99751836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2929275403","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2019.03.006","title":"Consensus in social networks: Revisited","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Convergence (economics); Mathematical economics; Social network (sociolinguistics); Bayesian network; Permissive; Bayesian probability; Computer science; Economics; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Artificial intelligence; Biology","score_opus":0.011140824609795834,"score_gpt":0.26076482832900455,"score_spread":0.2496240037192087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2929275403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9808937,0.000015370279,0.0013978374,0.00037278986,0.00013626408,0.00007411667,0.000004857378,0.0000018011207,0.017103298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99873155,0.000006556835,0.0006979435,0.000078373305,0.00034643617,5.9820945e-7,0.0000010236868,0.00000799624,0.00012950262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991958,0.00002144464,0.00054312276,0.00006370466,0.000042795975,0.00013314633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993635,0.00014104821,0.00033141466,0.00006718342,0.000048202335,0.000048691032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036149038,0.0000733261,0.00033127257,0.000045926052,0.000024776256,0.000037632464,0.000119632234,0.00004289193,0.00053712114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000106647,0.00006721676,0.00013631443,0.00005287598,0.000029941682,0.00006229785,0.000024600758,0.00020085563,0.000066701854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029367708,0.00014233074,0.025380496,0.000025590598,0.00006673218,0.0000022097038,0.0002958564,0.004536376,0.00001591188,0.9668303,0.00046949965,0.0022053113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023714153,0.00012268932,0.008908536,0.00020533883,0.000035030098,0.000014781434,0.0013129537,0.15261564,0.000018346846,0.8308674,0.0031303787,0.00039747267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000019169584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.2811572e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14807926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038445345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048871276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963124583","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2019.07.002","title":"Choice on the simplex domain","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Rationalizability; Axiom; Monotonic function; Mathematics; Simplex; Preference; Axiom of choice; Choice function; Mathematical economics; Domain (mathematical analysis); Revealed preference; Combinatorics; Function (biology); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Econometrics; Nash equilibrium; Statistics; Set theory","score_opus":0.0392807111881346,"score_gpt":0.226416320050177,"score_spread":0.1871356088620424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963124583","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9142863,0.00006573141,0.0007843543,0.0021648835,0.00044649662,0.00013845837,0.000010607559,0.0000065839786,0.08209659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99725217,0.000014949758,0.00047744348,0.00069157674,0.00027918819,0.0000020269356,2.889998e-7,0.000021228352,0.0012611428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856204,0.00003089815,0.0010507641,0.00013221109,0.000029005794,0.00019509152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99756503,0.0010149565,0.000984835,0.00033304785,0.000023702954,0.00007843749],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002624068,0.00012103365,0.0005144822,0.00010080493,0.00004843739,0.000081287784,0.00041277823,0.00007579816,0.0019699335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004046877,0.00008753626,0.0002350623,0.000056891287,0.000045042118,0.00013976268,0.000034400116,0.0002645255,0.00441543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000183153,0.00006640517,0.0009975227,0.00003052517,0.000057237015,9.441721e-7,0.00023845836,0.00021354327,0.000009922294,0.9976142,0.0006578385,0.00009510915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004749602,0.0001705228,0.0006622399,0.000060125938,0.0000049264936,0.000048168356,0.00025339064,0.0011569222,0.000058999056,0.92881167,0.06815921,0.0001388902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000014980903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.1607157e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082965866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008327595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017040074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981095392","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2019.10.001","title":"Bidding collusion without passive updating","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Collusion; Bidding; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Bayesian game; Path (computing); Class (philosophy); Mechanism design; Complete information; Private information retrieval; Economics; Computer science; Game theory; Repeated game; Artificial intelligence; Computer security","score_opus":0.056887231058295185,"score_gpt":0.35436200366252335,"score_spread":0.29747477260422817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981095392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9402622,0.000006454447,0.03928349,0.0011276453,0.00024585534,0.00009772961,0.0000025964555,0.0000061206542,0.018967891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875573,0.000007631191,0.010669523,0.00017776141,0.00014560614,0.0000013348264,1.8441176e-7,0.000008221201,0.0014324475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845785,0.000052858035,0.001020183,0.00012833363,0.00023095834,0.00010982255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970382,0.001324161,0.0010795513,0.00026032442,0.00019132614,0.00010647243],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023979612,0.00007507928,0.0003340403,0.00013621058,0.00008651517,0.00013676976,0.00042702843,0.000052816424,0.0025705127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012902836,0.000051436764,0.00014829774,0.00014060107,0.00004750904,0.0003814033,0.00008144455,0.0001590854,0.0017534097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006807848,0.0001498877,0.0016644533,0.000014502979,0.000047960573,0.0000021475742,0.00074720464,0.0046758414,0.001568501,0.9623949,0.0018825919,0.026783941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037663695,0.00006924152,0.00030508504,0.000042228316,0.000014905625,0.00015041135,0.0028265289,0.016617319,0.0011200175,0.96905017,0.00932616,0.000101313344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":1.010614e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.2051003e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047295075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053844542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006549216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99902385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003353436","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2020.01.005","title":"Acyclicity, anonymity, and prefilters","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science","keywords":"Anonymity; Pareto principle; Mathematical economics; Social choice theory; Pareto efficiency; Population; Class (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Property (philosophy); Finite set; Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical optimization; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05804514265662339,"score_gpt":0.216264277127635,"score_spread":0.1582191344710116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003353436","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96998847,0.00027664343,0.010034343,0.0034019458,0.00016326336,0.00008451999,0.00001605241,0.000011563308,0.016023211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965531,0.00009067875,0.0022982412,0.00070889725,0.00024836554,8.5573555e-7,2.8074567e-7,0.000016855816,0.00008268385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867857,0.000016315445,0.0009967801,0.0001411997,0.000018904308,0.00014826297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874747,0.00017436531,0.0007545333,0.00009579642,0.000019236759,0.00020860152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093827385,0.000108369044,0.0005661696,0.00006948868,0.000035263798,0.00008241385,0.00020082033,0.0000702969,0.00022463675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043688712,0.0001071665,0.0001306137,0.000046411966,0.00006424922,0.00023967435,0.00007284534,0.0001819696,0.0002505311],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006723499,0.00009577504,0.0061289747,0.00023675791,0.00013728582,0.000009230289,0.0013685322,0.00011535266,0.00006728891,0.99023646,0.00077299203,0.00076410593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014494872,0.00042894768,0.0017463204,0.00008125281,0.000028379543,0.0002603068,0.00036642898,0.011451994,0.00031061034,0.97163904,0.011884259,0.00035295667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000011167921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.4977174e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026564684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002984056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012183209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4370123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3054332779","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2021.102617","title":"Distance-based social index numbers: A unifying approach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Fractionalization; Parameterized complexity; Index (typography); Inequality; Partition (number theory); Econometrics; Class (philosophy); Population; Mathematics; Social class; Point (geometry); Diversity (politics); Mathematical economics; Economics; Computer science; Sociology; Demography; Combinatorics; Artificial intelligence; Ethnic group","score_opus":0.07275073042216591,"score_gpt":0.3258526927196353,"score_spread":0.2531019622974694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3054332779","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56184196,0.00024275768,0.23953909,0.0043325564,0.0021344866,0.00047366388,0.000042164753,0.00005129838,0.19134203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830166,0.0001410303,0.014159758,0.0004509025,0.0019449001,0.000007188522,0.000009165666,0.000033759898,0.00023666411],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973337,0.00033408578,0.0013006888,0.00025268216,0.00039845108,0.00038039737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99734825,0.00039443647,0.001458977,0.00025523207,0.0003161653,0.00022693002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033082468,0.00024600714,0.0010091856,0.00010270918,0.00032901875,0.00049897074,0.000707253,0.0005629695,0.00037446243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071411143,0.0002350868,0.00069686014,0.00009278094,0.0003442645,0.00026257258,0.00020746452,0.0011374683,0.000010269626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032371838,0.0028941142,0.0034047975,0.003819069,0.0009691561,0.00007728098,0.09195264,0.0056947293,0.0000056469557,0.8821729,0.0040843072,0.004601677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002863152,0.000109634275,0.0012221773,0.0013423067,0.0005260112,0.00003834811,0.07983657,0.031457163,0.00004360522,0.8535988,0.027118163,0.0018441027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000104383376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013011658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42117468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009045843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019647786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9586562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110703196","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2014.08.005","title":"A characterization of exact non-atomic market games","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Characterization (materials science); Mathematics; Banach space; Pure mathematics; Countable set; Discrete mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.01564100168352522,"score_gpt":0.20338288130289234,"score_spread":0.1877418796193671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110703196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9538758,0.000025492449,0.02647946,0.0001820548,0.00031891424,0.000083671766,0.000019483428,0.0000055421,0.01900959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99791807,0.000052637533,0.0011867064,0.00007145088,0.0002190981,0.0000017418384,0.0000013304677,0.00002191161,0.00052704394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810004,0.000031026455,0.0015605591,0.00012565844,0.000024934563,0.00015776673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974383,0.00023160382,0.0019673186,0.00022729764,0.000045922614,0.00008951785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025955746,0.0001214709,0.00077199755,0.00020038648,0.000024997538,0.00004109555,0.00026088854,0.0000945851,0.0006051172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003754925,0.00011984343,0.00021649168,0.000058686004,0.000055668035,0.00024324388,0.000029674547,0.00013390875,0.00017345583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013170605,0.00032904552,0.006327026,0.0005069081,0.00020914477,0.0000016295329,0.00097601616,0.00006968363,0.0024325082,0.9869094,0.00029820987,0.0018087495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002121486,0.0005207922,0.017851338,0.00044438205,0.000051454917,0.00020069181,0.00017712255,0.06140801,0.005095475,0.89817375,0.013430873,0.00052459567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000012221551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.1793763e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.088735595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053517844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019887586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6625609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124610736","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2019.02.002","title":"Bargaining with learning","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Complete information; Imperfect; Simple (philosophy)","score_opus":0.05566783136835925,"score_gpt":0.32955212144348167,"score_spread":0.27388429007512244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124610736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8776622,0.0000084740805,0.07054169,0.0005162577,0.00006120274,0.000046796024,3.835612e-7,0.0000056670133,0.051157344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889688,0.0000046608884,0.00833941,0.00009627644,0.00007321632,6.84911e-7,7.505172e-8,0.000006856027,0.0025100545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898773,0.000041792875,0.00061074406,0.000093945666,0.00017837543,0.00008739978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776393,0.0012268489,0.00061647594,0.00017439589,0.00013485385,0.0000835224],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023907179,0.00005661154,0.0002488265,0.000094226765,0.00005231083,0.00010217768,0.00030139743,0.000031215925,0.0019050366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063489884,0.000034448334,0.00008345918,0.0001029329,0.00004434746,0.0002872967,0.000029191575,0.00019537666,0.0016294505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000808678,0.00007622761,0.002741292,0.0000044234994,0.000043580567,0.0000024463745,0.0006342663,0.025364691,0.00016380106,0.9577153,0.00034024715,0.012832906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037983575,0.00019711995,0.00031357634,0.000024987363,0.00001219884,0.00027925373,0.0029461093,0.0078061665,0.0003215137,0.96969754,0.01793457,0.000087106906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":4.4320394e-8,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.922123e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11130658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022830913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050205206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3140798861","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2023.102892","title":"Common assumption of rationality","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Lexicographical order; Impossibility; Rationality; Iterated function; Type (biology); Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Computer science; Combinatorics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Biology; Political science","score_opus":0.21185990613665406,"score_gpt":0.42890268902350537,"score_spread":0.2170427828868513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3140798861","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9838956,0.000005146479,0.009706993,0.0020783865,0.00007554449,0.000045674304,0.000009036113,0.0000056510994,0.004177947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975749,0.000013671267,0.001866876,0.0000502649,0.00006373129,0.0000012375633,8.3230077e-7,0.0000035935195,0.00042489724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847543,0.00006988011,0.0010877479,0.00006936086,0.00022784281,0.00006972496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965653,0.0022323132,0.000744719,0.00022231975,0.00017260217,0.000062746985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052290014,0.000045825276,0.00028252281,0.00013708493,0.000035721507,0.000040507628,0.00036126332,0.000038003516,0.00057513313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013591888,0.000032839063,0.00014338846,0.00019399675,0.00007917873,0.00018970715,0.00004429278,0.000085334446,0.00065549515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031172138,0.00013169606,0.0007991924,0.000013217532,0.000025159374,9.997325e-7,0.0003022403,0.002954232,0.0007720315,0.98237437,0.003385416,0.009210284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013045038,0.000027916483,0.005127926,0.00000976528,0.000008910295,0.000018204228,0.00025636159,0.0054833693,0.0009819461,0.98597664,0.0019466293,0.000031898362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":1.8263381e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.280474e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013679275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019220044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043126383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8425282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281629502","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2022.102728","title":"General competing mechanism games with strategy-proof punishment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Microeconomics; Economics; Mechanism design; Mathematical economics; Complete information; Profit (economics); Monopoly; Ex-ante; Class (philosophy); Incentive; Mechanism (biology); Incentive compatibility; Private information retrieval; Strategic dominance; Computer science","score_opus":0.07034911560487102,"score_gpt":0.32485067297091613,"score_spread":0.25450155736604513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281629502","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.892698,0.000017292805,0.097525105,0.002278881,0.00011903925,0.0001131132,0.0000104289575,0.00000728977,0.0072308527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98586786,0.0000041212465,0.012567646,0.0002429281,0.00012174463,0.000011539286,5.267486e-7,0.000010010943,0.0011736184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834114,0.00011224911,0.0008924607,0.00014488965,0.00037717918,0.00013208916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807954,0.0005551223,0.0008821115,0.00025067397,0.000116190036,0.000116364216],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033676,0.000088236084,0.00030436285,0.000117419186,0.00025232698,0.00014291896,0.0005747784,0.000021114976,0.0030226712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015767019,0.000060595143,0.0001190176,0.0001387815,0.00006531959,0.00019989655,0.00012828776,0.0002521107,0.000052037118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048922713,0.0001719298,0.000025043217,0.0000032822625,0.00003488457,0.000006016287,0.00035214238,0.029821822,0.00015017058,0.96435755,0.00054674095,0.004481512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030389254,0.00024210854,0.000030020828,0.000005174616,0.000017315684,0.000513078,0.0049753804,0.012729902,0.0009717206,0.97411036,0.006013451,0.00008760634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":3.1405895e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.1333037e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09316987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008376082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010858647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4284991771","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2022.102742","title":"Insurance with heterogeneous preferences","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Insurance and Financial Risk Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Actua; University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Risk aversion (psychology); Economics; Monopolistic competition; Actuarial science; Expected utility hypothesis; Insurance premium; Piecewise linear function; Insurance policy; Auto insurance risk selection; Econometrics; Piecewise; Microeconomics; Key person insurance; Mathematical economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.026708228108017023,"score_gpt":0.2027981503344224,"score_spread":0.17608992222640538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4284991771","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9746334,0.00062989973,0.004556049,0.00037974608,0.00030395575,0.00012745475,0.00006126707,0.000008712328,0.019299539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99683553,0.00023768196,0.0022728827,0.0002706026,0.00009282464,0.000015993854,0.0000010205981,0.000019333516,0.00025411247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986771,0.00001229661,0.00089757924,0.00015925855,0.000050989802,0.00020282704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869853,0.00005302625,0.00095169526,0.0001985839,0.00003099152,0.00006715251],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072906964,0.00011976142,0.00049559475,0.00016278583,0.00013517402,0.000050226463,0.00038091972,0.00002832561,0.0007726114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040639476,0.00011271848,0.00013960098,0.00010771721,0.000049969007,0.00020487764,0.0000882924,0.0002402417,0.00011178448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033027946,0.0006830569,0.025944637,0.00010790805,0.00028200127,0.000080382284,0.0011080522,0.028086444,0.0000032857004,0.9362383,0.00079020305,0.0063454546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015841739,0.0013820266,0.008580883,0.00003278891,0.000020529045,0.00045243875,0.00038023983,0.0020615545,0.00006924581,0.89365655,0.09131381,0.00046574406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000041655344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000026732198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09052361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013582465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034820394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8459553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366490424","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2023.102847","title":"Level-<mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" display=\"inline\" id=\"d1e208\" altimg=\"si394.svg\"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math> predatory trading","year":2023,"lang":"lv","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Financial Markets and Investment Strategies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"Predation; Arbitrage; Volatility (finance); Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Econometrics; Biology; Economics; Ecology; Financial economics","score_opus":0.04334318530934053,"score_gpt":0.2411329660429397,"score_spread":0.19778978073359918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366490424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846731,0.0007641426,0.000692709,0.0010578703,0.002158756,0.00009780368,0.0005370821,0.00005158862,0.009966942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98972327,0.0038904059,0.0034232053,0.000691885,0.0014475557,0.000049473474,0.000065909284,0.00019982058,0.0005084792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954704,0.000047622525,0.0027281733,0.0006157773,0.00021699596,0.0009209993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954819,0.0007353472,0.0025610945,0.00072081084,0.00006545614,0.00043539336],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024683205,0.000512292,0.0009024826,0.000397249,0.00043834565,0.0007125563,0.0008941068,0.0007234961,0.00041681493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083917804,0.0006320538,0.00090141763,0.0002936033,0.00041594866,0.0012354883,0.00037373602,0.0009115193,0.00320062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016471815,0.00029168068,0.00004698102,0.0008500855,0.0005033239,0.00013468634,0.000804116,0.00076639355,0.000028974273,0.99293166,0.002566904,0.00091048534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011576578,0.00075079,0.00089042453,0.00065794034,0.00021606074,0.00030391803,0.0010117297,0.8505763,0.00027358514,0.13035458,0.013113213,0.0006938036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000041303185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002461573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8625771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001121545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047186782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387497916","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2023.102909","title":"A dual approach to agency problems","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Dual (grammatical number); Mathematical optimization; Constraint (computer-aided design); Uniqueness; Principal–agent problem; Convex optimization; Regular polygon; Simple (philosophy); Agency (philosophy); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.06479482765627677,"score_gpt":0.2323121892705191,"score_spread":0.16751736161424235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387497916","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69842434,0.00025880692,0.015841348,0.0015943252,0.0015112048,0.0005494538,0.000093437666,0.00007153832,0.28165558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99178123,0.0003311402,0.0048164246,0.00043585963,0.0011594195,0.000029656518,0.0000058480973,0.00007886855,0.0013615726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969104,0.00001622033,0.002260718,0.00031753958,0.00004324911,0.0004519009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802154,0.00013179336,0.0010938384,0.00034647505,0.000054781805,0.00035154613],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023818212,0.00018229429,0.0010593792,0.00049539725,0.00008860989,0.00015469355,0.00043882075,0.00015565245,0.00023376422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032785977,0.00022205406,0.00036542478,0.00026693608,0.000081823295,0.00035419184,0.00011625742,0.00021737447,0.0048027188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002199416,0.00024635863,0.00083595654,0.00016536472,0.0001751664,0.000007434564,0.0021821277,0.0036812203,0.000013278462,0.9845768,0.0074413614,0.00065289467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007480938,0.00019037163,0.0011535147,0.000054638855,0.000015312284,0.00012617996,0.00028275792,0.010189454,0.000022855085,0.95985806,0.026975473,0.00038328112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014049915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000031375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2933569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021336423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000563201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99597216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393537273","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2024.102980","title":"The reciprocity set","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Reciprocal; Distributive justice; Mathematical economics; Set (abstract data type); Distributive property; Computer science; Law and economics; Microeconomics; Economics; Economic Justice; Mathematics; Social psychology; Psychology; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.06116704158976148,"score_gpt":0.3670777470063868,"score_spread":0.3059107054166253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393537273","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87099904,0.0024379685,0.00025911708,0.015062384,0.001759148,0.00016905955,0.0000063976972,0.00003652234,0.109270364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922639,0.0030261425,0.0018951531,0.00014696964,0.00069565664,0.000005897028,1.8013985e-7,0.000018515264,0.0019475789],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991481,0.00004056325,0.0004745179,0.00007442626,0.000081695194,0.0001807298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895173,0.000673506,0.00014158282,0.000088999266,0.00004620201,0.00009796067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017298086,0.000070177106,0.00018508431,0.00003388271,0.000335091,0.0003111912,0.00028684293,0.000050575964,0.00012529355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023986983,0.000046740985,0.00016083587,0.00004714669,0.0003150521,0.00027098137,0.000051724714,0.00018395176,0.00017965988],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014416374,0.000034530927,0.00009711504,0.000016292875,0.00008330319,0.000008965034,0.009280773,0.000008999335,0.000034712768,0.9738002,0.0066304645,0.009990226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014044442,0.00008725676,0.000041936462,0.0000805892,0.000049523784,0.00004155529,0.014535228,0.00040344088,0.00036980817,0.62656265,0.3575319,0.00015565474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011789869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006546907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35090142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003122055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018139892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3000824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394008684","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2024.102983","title":"Smallest quasi-transitive extensions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Advanced Algebra and Logic","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Transitive relation; Transitive closure; Extension (predicate logic); Closure (psychology); Mathematics; Context (archaeology); Operator (biology); Property (philosophy); Path (computing); Mathematical economics; Pure mathematics; Discrete mathematics; Combinatorics; Computer science; Epistemology; Economics","score_opus":0.018510853443297236,"score_gpt":0.24884564604514683,"score_spread":0.2303347926018496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394008684","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04775184,0.0003635771,0.94535285,0.003008254,0.00040326276,0.00004016057,0.0000012068158,0.000030962383,0.0030479028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8676936,0.00016167325,0.13143526,0.0003710945,0.00019133688,0.0000010715792,1.418959e-7,0.000009936667,0.00013586589],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999217,0.00001644314,0.00043047225,0.00012401765,0.000068630405,0.00014343772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991521,0.0004048212,0.00009823636,0.0001694835,0.00005378248,0.000121543235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034769787,0.0000906049,0.00023774095,0.00009135266,0.000037223188,0.00013901509,0.0003691932,0.000044415436,0.00006883743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007501487,0.0000661982,0.00016491635,0.00008225611,0.000041214527,0.00040499185,0.000056306133,0.00021255373,0.00015576926],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030731833,0.000059174803,0.0000015011558,0.000026194439,0.000031618805,0.000119111486,0.00041743708,0.00027224614,0.000094196555,0.98691595,0.0002236503,0.011835846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012238004,0.00015571725,0.000041849922,0.000118152406,0.000016413975,0.001053023,0.00008945799,0.085831515,0.00021318387,0.910096,0.002155469,0.000106844906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":1.0737966e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.8051095e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81994176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046250287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000986524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26994842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402254436","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2026.103246","title":"Equity Auctions with Bidder Moral Hazard","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Moral hazard; Common value auction; Equity (law); Business; Economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Incentive; Law","score_opus":0.05095001067397433,"score_gpt":0.2561915318031489,"score_spread":0.20524152112917457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402254436","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9339061,0.00041003956,0.0076047736,0.0057340497,0.0022877106,0.00025410336,0.000033502554,0.000073336836,0.049696423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98853797,0.00025096384,0.00432675,0.000883165,0.004774295,0.000012341005,0.0000057468205,0.000094784824,0.0011140103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883,0.0000023762877,0.00065663765,0.00017448336,0.00014283232,0.00019362864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867576,0.000029212455,0.0008694352,0.00024952617,0.00015396705,0.000022097625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037710505,0.00022887712,0.0005376744,0.00017060066,0.0000395329,0.00049147266,0.00036153678,0.00014206136,0.00018909073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039271745,0.00017377078,0.00023541746,0.000095838244,0.000072145485,0.00040236636,0.0005953959,0.0007416283,0.00043706843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002383401,0.00056079763,0.0029206611,0.008955816,0.0010718197,0.00036041404,0.00012976983,0.06264096,0.000013688545,0.7650729,0.14693485,0.011100007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030503873,0.000020997099,0.0011988902,0.00086467114,0.0003361824,0.00007937183,0.00003524142,0.020093087,0.000007530404,0.9579268,0.018831028,0.00030113634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000069567254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027077114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19285394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011787369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018105899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7086167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407319896","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2025.103096","title":"Pareto efficiency and financial fairness under limited expected loss constraint","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Université Laval","keywords":"Pareto principle; Economics; Constraint (computer-aided design); Microeconomics; Pareto optimal; Pareto efficiency; Multi-objective optimization; Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Operations management","score_opus":0.020290176614869967,"score_gpt":0.22034858101691138,"score_spread":0.20005840440204142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407319896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85868454,0.00075797405,0.12378406,0.0017557546,0.0005391697,0.00014011632,0.000044920656,0.000014483529,0.014279005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967061,0.00035701774,0.0019612445,0.00051218626,0.0001232686,0.0000045808333,0.0000013707923,0.000017095977,0.0003170881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979347,0.000013443768,0.0015022536,0.00025333892,0.000018914707,0.00027733477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985472,0.0002872558,0.00072404166,0.00024272683,0.00006264839,0.0001361187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008421492,0.00019067392,0.0008209894,0.00028142706,0.00008890051,0.00011691884,0.00027860657,0.00016389525,0.00023685396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037436569,0.00019635366,0.00018071942,0.000100133184,0.00025124906,0.0002448529,0.00009501666,0.0002419935,0.000049863003],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004358738,0.00011992451,0.0006749757,0.000057472407,0.000068822206,0.000004652388,0.0002931488,0.0006390114,0.0000047650146,0.9973384,0.00020908627,0.00054614706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011948672,0.000092703274,0.0010110225,0.00007647437,0.000023206992,0.00008427671,0.00047684845,0.004990965,0.00007522217,0.98847544,0.0032649436,0.00023401763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000038817034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000038636267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13802163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016025692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011510642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80070704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410119623","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2025.103132","title":"Return expectations across the wealth distribution","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"Renmin University of China","keywords":"Economics; Distribution (mathematics); Distribution of wealth; Econometrics; Wealth distribution; Financial economics; Mathematics; Inequality; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.048986260358429116,"score_gpt":0.27885388564121516,"score_spread":0.22986762528278604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410119623","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94215673,0.00074362697,0.03289171,0.011580796,0.000687397,0.00016377677,0.00023755369,0.000011381562,0.011527001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99739087,0.00022694726,0.0006970193,0.00064807036,0.00019877378,0.0000049105215,0.0000064756564,0.000010559894,0.00081639417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981628,0.000017014627,0.0013778724,0.00014115206,0.000016871441,0.00028426517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983954,0.00030893896,0.0008791129,0.00030056323,0.00002312791,0.00009288407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012360625,0.00012738022,0.0004894006,0.000078366706,0.00018887062,0.0001293895,0.00037363134,0.0000920739,0.00025873704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042425,0.000104216786,0.00026211832,0.00009561751,0.00010742611,0.00030818893,0.000053273667,0.00026907556,0.00031532338],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059024555,0.00018256996,0.0026789242,0.000072829615,0.00023776115,0.0000021759815,0.00217021,0.0020671713,0.0000032780872,0.9766705,0.014493441,0.0013620988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085198745,0.00008695731,0.0035262243,0.000051589566,0.000025495257,0.0000743911,0.0014678912,0.039906003,0.0000914625,0.9076025,0.046113312,0.00020217914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011274593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000627533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06906801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002341153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004374761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42498374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411868961","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2025.103152","title":"Revealed preference axioms for endogenous consideration set formation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Mathematical economics; Revealed preference; Preference; Set (abstract data type); Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.4683025243735864,"score_gpt":0.43634930970207964,"score_spread":0.03195321467150675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411868961","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34334445,0.000048219692,0.6518118,0.0012460387,0.00047526657,0.00033529397,0.000020064803,0.000008056481,0.0027108677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9376063,0.000022662594,0.06138571,0.00045825928,0.000103752216,0.0000104680985,0.0000015963961,0.000009049489,0.00040225676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968601,0.000108011445,0.0023260894,0.00019135389,0.0003290793,0.00018538478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99184537,0.0056773704,0.0012353564,0.00037523117,0.0007696339,0.00009703301],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053625884,0.00013118726,0.0005744356,0.00043315193,0.00013139917,0.00052164576,0.0005716271,0.00010340399,0.00027896653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012950726,0.00009634199,0.00023747135,0.00016177572,0.000052427826,0.0008028313,0.000087448934,0.00014000891,0.00009278173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001180357,0.0005608757,0.00022042499,0.0003845285,0.00025489254,0.000032325064,0.005812529,0.0065027117,0.008702674,0.6998709,0.039788306,0.23668948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011169788,0.00010140587,0.00012332389,0.00012348901,0.000035315894,0.00021171696,0.0007477822,0.10560564,0.0026163082,0.8847431,0.004464083,0.000110841764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":3.591512e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000038711123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5942618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013442326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019897174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414482117","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2025.103181","title":"Prudence and higher-order risk attitudes in the rank-dependent utility model","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Actua; University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Weighting; Prudence; Generality; Stochastic dominance; Consistency (knowledge bases); Differentiable function; Expected utility hypothesis; Probability measure; Function (biology); Monotonic function","score_opus":0.12133564214320712,"score_gpt":0.4065820069671549,"score_spread":0.2852463648239478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414482117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97755927,0.00014825544,0.015570766,0.00221766,0.00024528027,0.00012146109,0.000009242923,0.000004000521,0.004124073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99119383,0.000184041,0.007914367,0.00040897567,0.000034767596,0.0000026382636,8.736802e-8,0.000005689732,0.00025561568],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749774,0.00014878582,0.0015953918,0.00026131663,0.0003120826,0.00018466932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99525356,0.0033122408,0.0006788183,0.00049701746,0.00017772305,0.00008066409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0086999815,0.00014373094,0.0005542457,0.00023928143,0.00009956686,0.00044719997,0.0010520011,0.00010786535,0.000158879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024969624,0.00008341336,0.00015355126,0.00019348339,0.000172903,0.0004027802,0.00018073867,0.00042725474,0.000044627912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048716646,0.0018130449,0.062459644,0.000064179134,0.0001180804,0.000051470382,0.002121061,0.0272835,0.000029669043,0.11680331,0.005171866,0.783597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049978757,0.000040890915,0.015834784,0.000055834935,0.000035172066,0.000039813778,0.00033352114,0.051351923,0.000011980387,0.9309202,0.0007834941,0.00009262923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000047130384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032637967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81411684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000729406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000164884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43123597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416757703","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2025.103205","title":"Optimal contracts under general mixed constraints: Continuity, structure, and applications","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Schedule; Budget constraint; Constraint (computer-aided design); Class (philosophy); Adverse selection; Optimal control; Selection (genetic algorithm); Principal (computer security); Quality (philosophy)","score_opus":0.036305174246393165,"score_gpt":0.3428790306051539,"score_spread":0.3065738563587607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416757703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54475635,0.000062468585,0.44684508,0.0015867222,0.0001199829,0.00017411425,0.00002978164,0.000007294869,0.0064181737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819675,0.00002647898,0.016527845,0.0005076154,0.00014176819,0.0000070490987,8.721562e-7,0.0000058950895,0.0008149931],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841195,0.00006145474,0.0010741942,0.00017482006,0.00014637919,0.00013120311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970318,0.0015146153,0.00079625676,0.0002606279,0.00025838942,0.00013830862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014326497,0.00010652061,0.00039941783,0.00017202698,0.00012718744,0.00022783523,0.00039305305,0.00009086721,0.0004499784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007461012,0.000080039485,0.000114588984,0.00015115153,0.0004301441,0.00023184299,0.00008032702,0.00020036405,0.00003871665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017323777,0.000060104117,0.000073101284,0.000004494287,0.000048016347,4.6446067e-7,0.000039156814,0.001397324,0.0002229613,0.9771591,0.0007028178,0.020275133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004933855,0.000019506993,0.0013715213,0.000012008859,0.00004055843,0.00013984733,0.0006121069,0.0015401245,0.0009252541,0.98357314,0.011193101,0.000079438614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":2.0458344e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014433725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43721113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003966943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012817423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4926948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416958545","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2025.103209","title":"The pipeline externalities problem","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Shapley value; Pipeline (software); Shadow price; Core (optical fiber); Transferable utility; Cooperative game theory; Externality; Set (abstract data type); Production (economics); Bellman equation","score_opus":0.06407532836068425,"score_gpt":0.372199913233345,"score_spread":0.30812458487266076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416958545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45709488,0.0004282342,0.314844,0.04004276,0.0004835306,0.00023367036,0.0000071542195,0.000013991892,0.18685177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94055176,0.00017141506,0.012894205,0.0008393461,0.00024293056,0.000008794883,1.18008906e-7,0.000008791655,0.04528266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984517,0.00006568515,0.0011315882,0.000080525904,0.00015964167,0.00011084517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99478763,0.0041362406,0.00049537135,0.00031548514,0.00020858273,0.00005670049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051065097,0.00006307045,0.0002311019,0.00007858131,0.00014849326,0.00028827044,0.0008452403,0.000031810454,0.00020120073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017131421,0.000032178978,0.00015358393,0.000117735784,0.00015339945,0.00014587925,0.000079473204,0.00014406268,0.00019543503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020425383,0.00003807441,0.000030652383,0.0000037754019,0.000014867363,4.3708286e-7,0.0001137274,0.00016765723,0.000019579034,0.96352226,0.007256899,0.028811658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011840463,0.000013079501,0.00005268204,0.00002057916,0.00001097567,0.000026139935,0.0007093652,0.0019037433,0.00023380613,0.9055493,0.09133282,0.000029111008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":2.021185e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016307044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48345688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027616863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009258277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27797985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}