{"meta":{"query_hash":"cb235211cb08","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics"},"cohort_total":39,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":39,"exported":39,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/cb235211cb08","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Mathematical+Economics"},"results":[{"id":"W1537982990","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2015.08.002","title":"Centralized allocation in multiple markets","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond","keywords":"Lexicographical order; Class (philosophy); Pareto efficiency; Pareto principle; Domain (mathematical analysis); Mathematical economics; Object (grammar); Preference; Economics; Characterization (materials science); Microeconomics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07626212296768375,"score_gpt":0.24154481937529573,"score_spread":0.16528269640761198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1537982990","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2455439,0.0010871111,0.697139,0.0048368815,0.00036841526,0.00016147204,0.00017296677,0.00033631842,0.050353944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95368916,0.0002889272,0.028487315,0.00023379679,0.00019348251,0.00013338933,0.000044953285,0.000054528937,0.016874341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970324,0.0014189151,0.00013632858,0.0004919028,0.00046429827,0.000456215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98975664,0.0066410303,0.0010160761,0.0010685263,0.0008639682,0.0006538383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004074828,0.0005560192,0.0030559972,0.00081210386,0.0014696599,0.0043084915,0.0022228453,0.0025628167,0.009964529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014361775,0.00097053434,0.0009812443,0.0011548767,0.002842534,0.0049551986,0.0025010388,0.0022153575,0.0008308356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013112299,0.00009643852,0.00033953125,0.00006301684,0.000058495654,0.00013031915,0.00009451274,0.07615225,0.0007904841,0.91067725,0.0024298877,0.009036729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081662285,0.00002566963,0.00016541402,0.000010986153,0.000020840023,0.000042633663,0.00004262151,0.27667695,0.00021528098,0.7218036,0.00089685275,0.000017495118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012033193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013007716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009964529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020564622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017385026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033334672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541257362","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2016.01.003","title":"Volume of trade and dynamic network formation in two-sided economies","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Stylized fact; Pairwise comparison; Economics; Matching (statistics); Population; Shock (circulatory); Stability (learning theory); Microeconomics; Econometrics; Economy; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.044887382889535345,"score_gpt":0.3321596460919777,"score_spread":0.2872722632024423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541257362","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8279613,0.001247807,0.13756974,0.002287133,0.00014767423,0.000052266583,0.00034978535,0.00014427029,0.03024003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99287957,0.0003215426,0.0032716654,0.000038720747,0.00006757406,0.000019703279,0.000047790767,0.000017209288,0.0033362808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990727,0.00042207178,0.00004464729,0.00014537694,0.00017922097,0.00013592165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9785993,0.015566808,0.0029593653,0.0008566526,0.0006891483,0.0013288104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021105523,0.00035957087,0.0009822976,0.0014962758,0.00078247226,0.004249255,0.0015401851,0.001964584,0.007049258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017234312,0.0005630696,0.00054312503,0.0013067904,0.0024628348,0.006222946,0.0018200687,0.0010666796,0.00040562113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005070654,0.00017588463,0.006571483,0.00017111498,0.00011104601,0.0004796321,0.0005395719,0.37475947,0.002284844,0.5885783,0.0024468477,0.023374833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004625485,0.00010901371,0.0026544859,0.00003813437,0.000036283487,0.00022473684,0.0002812262,0.33633512,0.0005282522,0.6582108,0.0014961673,0.000039470935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00071342883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089766225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007049258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014111634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044704985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02358216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981826574","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2010.05.004","title":"Options and efficiency in spaces of bounded claims","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Stochastic processes and financial applications","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bounded function; Separable space; Space (punctuation); Injective function; Mathematics; Duality (order theory); Mathematical economics; Norm (philosophy); State space; Pure mathematics; Function (biology); Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Mathematical analysis; Statistics; Political science","score_opus":0.019042687181018276,"score_gpt":0.23099258969627076,"score_spread":0.21194990251525248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981826574","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28465858,0.004081445,0.6921406,0.0033577306,0.00009856202,0.000052918,0.00026201495,0.00012799655,0.015220116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9610794,0.0012673736,0.031846598,0.00016070493,0.0001813879,0.00009171539,0.00021388257,0.000079520345,0.0050794883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931102,0.0041334783,0.00050899264,0.0006333561,0.0011779855,0.00043607896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9254418,0.06295561,0.003882085,0.0030593488,0.0025324416,0.002128666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010900287,0.0013140704,0.0027319475,0.003443215,0.0011219942,0.0074256314,0.002399898,0.0025468308,0.005517321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050918426,0.0010604116,0.0016415931,0.0030072466,0.007336754,0.017434651,0.004762515,0.0032587254,0.00044271577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004230102,0.000017360784,0.00042081307,0.000030014657,0.000023772755,0.0000398353,0.00011871073,0.009223448,0.0001848535,0.9876123,0.0001565346,0.0021300537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014972356,0.000014778517,0.00020777278,0.000013792248,0.0000080821355,0.000032617536,0.000053883396,0.033609364,0.000110900844,0.9656411,0.00028393295,0.000008993466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00079872616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045919736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010900287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016652896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010836724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05764693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989193531","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2012.06.002","title":"Price and quality decisions under network effects","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Digital Platforms and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Incentive; Economics; Microeconomics; Monopoly; Marginal cost; Optimism","score_opus":0.044321102726370555,"score_gpt":0.24806938376222923,"score_spread":0.20374828103585868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989193531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.922839,0.00070708676,0.03071662,0.0059247455,0.00013962478,0.000059197577,0.00045100925,0.00008310402,0.039079603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949114,0.0002056277,0.00075222517,0.00008026711,0.00007375629,0.000006169787,0.000035626603,0.000012050251,0.0039229486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988194,0.00040862052,0.000040466704,0.00019943005,0.00015860786,0.00037344103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9747695,0.019572787,0.0023974953,0.0008625294,0.0011021124,0.0012957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042390344,0.00037654705,0.0011839072,0.00090256316,0.0006128489,0.003668204,0.0010429452,0.0022864344,0.018504584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02636059,0.000609784,0.0006084,0.00094948884,0.002104959,0.00587206,0.001163372,0.0020138198,0.00064078066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026495482,0.00087309565,0.019976394,0.00026333355,0.00024620746,0.0007835034,0.000569653,0.24945062,0.0048613404,0.67662597,0.008128393,0.035571985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033909225,0.00022715783,0.019520175,0.000029210303,0.00014484626,0.00013832365,0.00056184933,0.47895125,0.00071511423,0.49758875,0.0016842922,0.00009992805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007692479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059270137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018504584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025190003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007562487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061904013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993299296","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2013.04.003","title":"On refutability of the Nash bargaining solution","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Bargaining problem; Economics; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Subgame; Nash equilibrium; Epsilon-equilibrium; Best response","score_opus":0.028164037395038904,"score_gpt":0.26955963496009033,"score_spread":0.24139559756505144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993299296","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1183818,0.002040113,0.5431632,0.049164966,0.0030153662,0.0005273027,0.00081694766,0.0005940327,0.2822963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8573651,0.0018056633,0.10231806,0.0056906757,0.0019541448,0.0010025341,0.0007005377,0.0005407248,0.028622553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98708075,0.0072899186,0.0006070377,0.0018274345,0.0018892197,0.0013056874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.875243,0.10626076,0.0023429783,0.008457469,0.006386106,0.001309771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019163271,0.0012391325,0.0033737267,0.002981414,0.0057517076,0.0055902773,0.0068699596,0.009446096,0.021977328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17452875,0.001148162,0.003954171,0.003031192,0.012827426,0.016400494,0.008475152,0.013248337,0.0025596262],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008711328,0.000039259045,0.00018314882,0.0000705099,0.000028843222,0.000098006414,0.00022529044,0.0054583293,0.00009970646,0.9866477,0.0034586168,0.00360343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030303183,0.000006422545,0.000020553043,0.000025660012,0.0000068690415,0.000019829127,0.000043464508,0.010280719,0.00005860531,0.9888164,0.0006827098,0.00000866025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031669573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001655319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021977328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031164882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055620493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.101346254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994622582","doi":"10.1016/s0304-4068(01)00060-x","title":"Rank-dependent preferences without ranking axioms","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Ranking (information retrieval); Mathematical economics; Weighting; Rank (graph theory); Dual (grammatical number); Function (biology); Set (abstract data type); Outcome (game theory); Expected utility hypothesis; Mathematics; Axiomatic system; Property (philosophy); Computer science; Decision theory; Combinatorics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.16462797547617009,"score_gpt":0.3913393237749928,"score_spread":0.22671134829882272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994622582","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041577,0.00081056374,0.90139043,0.0042580166,0.0003658818,0.00012744157,0.0008595357,0.00027637754,0.05033469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66896147,0.0016879145,0.27375382,0.0018451134,0.0012526978,0.00048517663,0.0013655319,0.000304118,0.05034417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903503,0.004698256,0.0007193474,0.001238642,0.0021471283,0.00084635534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96577024,0.020457247,0.002505006,0.005833937,0.0042013275,0.0012322696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008634765,0.0012835757,0.0019863255,0.0020412295,0.001763856,0.0061612963,0.002565018,0.0029172155,0.010951032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03838008,0.001510791,0.0017899352,0.002630164,0.0031914483,0.018132895,0.0033988291,0.005987086,0.0026828644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003610116,0.000034401935,0.0001432851,0.00006222101,0.000023010514,0.00004303508,0.000054330096,0.0017694698,0.00023284786,0.98665684,0.0021058333,0.008838641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015520125,0.00001635651,0.000068536545,0.0000087632025,0.000011789863,0.00007242071,0.000018066732,0.010013388,0.00021399489,0.9881555,0.001391594,0.000014042663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009071041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010364855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010951032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015690911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017530825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045665503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028553491","doi":"10.1016/s0304-4068(99)00044-0","title":"A note on ordinally equivalent Pareto surfaces","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Pareto principle; Corollary; Surface (topology); Transformation (genetics); Set (abstract data type); Monotone polygon; Preference; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Pure mathematics; Geometry; Chemistry; Statistics","score_opus":0.03604073082717639,"score_gpt":0.23878914217537556,"score_spread":0.20274841134819915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028553491","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072092116,0.002598707,0.6012573,0.011230693,0.002496758,0.00010011463,0.0004668688,0.0003215241,0.30943596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7285321,0.0034844612,0.2021824,0.005077729,0.00318977,0.0003358042,0.00070893375,0.00053613505,0.05595286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99575436,0.0014605843,0.00033919275,0.0006164447,0.0013927978,0.0004367693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899547,0.0064480817,0.00048651747,0.0013775225,0.001215504,0.0005176443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041149408,0.00079174584,0.0016603811,0.0028223929,0.004440744,0.005806976,0.0020659291,0.0030882985,0.015500751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020067142,0.0006789206,0.0023989289,0.0037906398,0.005660869,0.013751915,0.006484345,0.0086908685,0.0016551465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050607973,0.000005895623,0.00004609524,0.000009179551,0.0000025910515,0.000015116374,0.000043891363,0.0002480892,0.00006157457,0.9957229,0.00083422253,0.0030054548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021767682,0.000003091169,0.000036963665,0.000006079914,0.0000018961971,0.00002243027,0.000017265575,0.000723122,0.000030805702,0.99689305,0.002259393,0.0000037094915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009075747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000639853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015500751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016830532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009048967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051855206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046426498","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2013.11.005","title":"The geometry of revealed preference","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Preference relation; Dimension (graph theory); Space (punctuation); Relation (database); Irrational number; Revealed preference; Mathematics; Consumption (sociology); Set (abstract data type); Binary relation; Mathematical economics; Finite set; Pure mathematics; Geometry; Econometrics; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.05799301617180113,"score_gpt":0.31267366977119015,"score_spread":0.254680653599389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046426498","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36241207,0.0073414333,0.40760258,0.036062557,0.00047856523,0.0001324896,0.0021322968,0.00044789648,0.18339014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96835595,0.0028207218,0.01812278,0.0007250316,0.0005921047,0.00011657886,0.00032129727,0.00008579107,0.00885974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969043,0.0018212928,0.00014650369,0.00042083595,0.00047811755,0.00022894717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98211896,0.012169094,0.0016500158,0.0018904794,0.0012629388,0.00090859685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032024863,0.0005992531,0.0017522466,0.0023410644,0.0017875835,0.0073886197,0.0018039725,0.0026556423,0.010223631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020131685,0.0008156512,0.0009985346,0.0023746826,0.006839501,0.013274906,0.0026860547,0.0031634474,0.0007839597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008957433,0.0000033846081,0.00007984884,0.00000950216,0.0000055941077,0.000013513291,0.0000455251,0.0004941717,0.000047173762,0.99819833,0.0003344918,0.00075962814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000580219,0.000002751018,0.0000475886,0.0000025342138,0.0000021237388,0.0000138533915,0.000012347069,0.001992584,0.000013876981,0.9975414,0.00036176748,0.0000033941944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023214698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010240293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010223631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031167902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013347872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034201443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067563274","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2011.07.006","title":"Cardinal versus ordinal criteria in choice under risk with disconnected utility ranges","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Irrational number; Mathematical economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Mathematics; Range (aeronautics); Subjective expected utility; Outcome (game theory); Certainty; Expected value; Preference; Function (biology); Econometrics; Statistics","score_opus":0.28101133384067,"score_gpt":0.4006125456551103,"score_spread":0.11960121181444028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067563274","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40026546,0.002405359,0.55878615,0.0051564164,0.00015281279,0.00011819848,0.0002618362,0.00011081472,0.03274288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9319183,0.0005074679,0.064643994,0.00016948015,0.00014757586,0.00015315518,0.00012015695,0.00004485375,0.002295021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870631,0.008466204,0.000797533,0.0009617974,0.002194895,0.00051648804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90477675,0.084136136,0.0037672087,0.0024808864,0.0023362818,0.002502674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014945142,0.00086513936,0.0019407765,0.0037416592,0.0015355875,0.008464411,0.0018628095,0.0027826538,0.004973262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.077677846,0.00083616044,0.0017315231,0.0037636166,0.010083978,0.019376768,0.005400931,0.0037744415,0.0003286485],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013699365,0.000029935734,0.00094363804,0.00008396717,0.000025768859,0.00011901386,0.00042824176,0.007791499,0.00019163355,0.9837039,0.00021097269,0.0063344464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025335252,0.000021940788,0.00022593193,0.000024561787,0.000011816306,0.00006777253,0.0001450565,0.018592123,0.000065353524,0.98048085,0.00032497296,0.000014303788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007111358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005538015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014945142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021013871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076999224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07903838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094786392","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2007.05.004","title":"Weakened WARP and top-cycle choice rules","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Mathematics; Tournament; Transitive relation; Context (archaeology); Simple (philosophy); Finite set; Transitive closure; Set (abstract data type); Closure (psychology); Mathematical economics; Combinatorics; Axiom of choice; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Set theory; Economics; Geometry","score_opus":0.024854315058667042,"score_gpt":0.23501538092675447,"score_spread":0.21016106586808744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094786392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77854776,0.00033035793,0.17441057,0.0022114224,0.00010588378,0.000073023264,0.0002561028,0.0001477583,0.04391704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877487,0.00009650431,0.0049833176,0.00010802724,0.000035114284,0.000029918941,0.00004639229,0.000025471187,0.0069265733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990435,0.00040463224,0.000055179255,0.00014953087,0.00013396346,0.00021316155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98702663,0.008598709,0.0011898887,0.0015468652,0.0007525469,0.00088531175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028430044,0.000303499,0.0011799128,0.00080392114,0.0010464306,0.0023588447,0.001169903,0.0013940174,0.010884889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02269798,0.0004977356,0.0006359848,0.0006421743,0.0020158812,0.0034924105,0.0014062022,0.0022617704,0.0005761654],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016765155,0.000057802394,0.0015206502,0.000042757478,0.00003202195,0.0001390868,0.00021113678,0.014117421,0.0008469443,0.96947247,0.0017567712,0.0116352765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035941346,0.000021196924,0.0005278936,0.0000064153296,0.000010751384,0.000065273314,0.00006532581,0.05326921,0.00021938357,0.94517463,0.0005928595,0.000011214866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015579788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001376161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010884889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007926758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008062484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03641355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101674550","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2007.12.003","title":"A limit theorem for systems of social interactions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Convergence (economics); Mathematical economics; Homogeneity (statistics); Limit (mathematics); Mathematics; Class (philosophy); Computer science; Economics; Mathematical analysis; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1394832372931899,"score_gpt":0.4100161867334114,"score_spread":0.2705329494402215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101674550","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0306413,0.0028540085,0.92347217,0.004734471,0.00040743648,0.00012659242,0.00030569744,0.00032122666,0.0371371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7406395,0.0056643593,0.20665574,0.002399905,0.002281057,0.0016874316,0.00050666154,0.00046880255,0.039696537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99616325,0.0015201767,0.00025217579,0.00069293083,0.00092007226,0.00045133466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97397465,0.019853916,0.0013000142,0.0012384616,0.0021428645,0.0014901026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009882846,0.0019964895,0.0035302625,0.0040367832,0.0030300466,0.0062417057,0.0050595496,0.004164984,0.009122912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03423384,0.0012562884,0.0035651962,0.002677427,0.0077214744,0.014819259,0.0064534415,0.0060859905,0.0010445745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013169749,0.000024488152,0.00021011037,0.000085179105,0.000036897207,0.00006110247,0.00015498213,0.00487556,0.00026968212,0.9906247,0.00092945393,0.0027147243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021612963,0.000020342148,0.00010059588,0.000029309962,0.000021799102,0.00010354544,0.000033413256,0.05610476,0.000102546794,0.9419653,0.0014794507,0.000017376742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028282553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013148698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009882846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030340538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027390316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05226612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131258498","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2006.04.010","title":"Inter-temporal preference for flexibility and risky choice","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Flexibility (engineering); Preference; Mathematical economics; Normative; Consistency (knowledge bases); Ex-ante; Representation (politics); Key (lock); Subjective expected utility; Time consistency; Econometrics; Economics; Revealed preference; Expected utility hypothesis; Computer science; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence; Actuarial science","score_opus":0.22270796674666915,"score_gpt":0.4046448403129322,"score_spread":0.18193687356626304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131258498","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94662666,0.00030700167,0.043725286,0.0004765228,0.000028870476,0.000016566244,0.00008735081,0.000027397644,0.008704314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99733835,0.00006362313,0.0020190564,0.000022663146,0.000017602586,0.0000076135325,0.000031940624,0.000005821759,0.0004932264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992525,0.00028617523,0.00006573205,0.00013890138,0.00015400807,0.000102586804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979041,0.014479804,0.0029414757,0.0018399536,0.000510593,0.0011872583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029107942,0.00030729978,0.0004013775,0.00060550094,0.00028588268,0.00208549,0.0005023384,0.0010420409,0.008331562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022000924,0.00025134083,0.00068530877,0.0005359892,0.00097245397,0.0027640841,0.00082297623,0.0013004873,0.00021645283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0045369575,0.00090989005,0.13367647,0.00046593903,0.0010019903,0.0025393632,0.0020686677,0.057399385,0.024192313,0.67851466,0.0010975762,0.093596876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017586508,0.0005626563,0.10165048,0.000046663376,0.00019889468,0.0012487624,0.000742609,0.10101934,0.0014423843,0.7917825,0.00101378,0.000116091156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046737798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006896487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008331562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004958823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002672972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027871847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336900194","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2016.09.001","title":"Voting over selfishly optimal nonlinear income tax schedules with a minimum-utility constraint","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Condorcet method; Pairwise comparison; Microeconomics; Voting; Incentive compatibility; Income tax; Mathematical economics; Private information retrieval; Schedule; Incentive; Mathematical optimization; Econometrics; Mathematics; Public economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.025449477664725138,"score_gpt":0.22422245668476096,"score_spread":0.19877297902003582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336900194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6161106,0.00022393934,0.35813916,0.002458912,0.00014122263,0.00019355677,0.0005203564,0.0002513269,0.021960894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9757205,0.00010080207,0.017673438,0.00010178314,0.00005402693,0.00007531224,0.00014253339,0.000052477724,0.006079166],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984542,0.00083097053,0.000078274694,0.00019660433,0.00013132468,0.00030864615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98678744,0.009804592,0.0011696612,0.0010378605,0.0005343001,0.0006661802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003710539,0.0006204998,0.0019607663,0.0005371363,0.00070139824,0.0021573778,0.0017183822,0.0017120481,0.0075949426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020894133,0.0007036716,0.00064767135,0.0008021267,0.0013200099,0.002827903,0.0013077535,0.0017874636,0.0006413394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016516516,0.00021767481,0.002390405,0.00015513343,0.00010068363,0.00018061318,0.00026743833,0.57527024,0.0017731637,0.37816432,0.005045128,0.034783456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014312513,0.00007679985,0.00033960494,0.000016301543,0.00001698709,0.000022669108,0.000071065246,0.8223518,0.0003444219,0.17608438,0.0005183295,0.000014517003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002469943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026590254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075949426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001429465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001536324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025407612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2472594781","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2017.02.003","title":"The consumption–investment decision of a prospect theory household: A two-period model","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Consumption (sociology); Loss aversion; Endowment effect; Portfolio; Endowment; Prospect theory; Asset (computer security); Autonomous consumption; Microeconomics; Investment (military); Value (mathematics); Expected utility hypothesis; Risk aversion (psychology); Public economics; Financial economics","score_opus":0.03510239654338768,"score_gpt":0.2636981760496703,"score_spread":0.2285957795062826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2472594781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80439013,0.0017428667,0.13469064,0.018880777,0.0002516356,0.0003525852,0.003341755,0.00036088473,0.035988797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94605476,0.0010968664,0.0052638697,0.0005183994,0.00018519882,0.00016611059,0.0006028677,0.000048798578,0.046063114],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984884,0.0006718781,0.000048511465,0.0002898309,0.000073159514,0.00042811874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99343646,0.0040805284,0.0007548203,0.00019992147,0.0002323821,0.00129597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035070847,0.0016196058,0.003814737,0.0013223655,0.0014398524,0.005718189,0.004387393,0.0092651285,0.0157409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071313144,0.002310883,0.0017746827,0.0019161791,0.003936331,0.0053606713,0.0031682837,0.003803331,0.0020013645],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002028029,0.0010093179,0.012473952,0.0002961777,0.00040535562,0.0022872624,0.0011585678,0.7337747,0.0014342398,0.23135267,0.0053660297,0.008413662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035335083,0.00037708622,0.0028242858,0.000042046213,0.0001601721,0.00019477158,0.0005414332,0.9442355,0.00010675757,0.0502629,0.000768138,0.00013355454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026484339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0131093785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026484339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028772124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021421798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052660346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767914980","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2017.09.004","title":"Sticky prices in a dynamic network economy: A family of counterexamples","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Counterexample; Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.0406645709782539,"score_gpt":0.24665732789642952,"score_spread":0.20599275691817562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767914980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6287085,0.002382199,0.27978817,0.022933654,0.0005966117,0.00025788782,0.0008747547,0.0006751305,0.06378313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796259,0.0017212556,0.011916832,0.0007514873,0.0005631134,0.00018112623,0.00021129243,0.00008092567,0.0049481047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858356,0.00066174427,0.00008269645,0.00024370133,0.00022387598,0.0002043732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97214466,0.02017518,0.0035617775,0.0020085974,0.00078366534,0.0013262314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005352684,0.0009435738,0.0024204312,0.0021419434,0.0022607893,0.0042633433,0.0028578057,0.0052425307,0.012805556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03595667,0.00065877405,0.0017033321,0.0023863316,0.005855279,0.009489141,0.0033394422,0.004848602,0.00048617032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015175104,0.0001195059,0.0009330766,0.00010348975,0.000067255554,0.00037575653,0.00020483606,0.012620921,0.00020901358,0.9760667,0.0046472144,0.0045004603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020306265,0.000039169485,0.000485737,0.000028442757,0.00003218214,0.00017763488,0.00015172819,0.0933929,0.00008678543,0.90425575,0.0011181633,0.000028433806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025704156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015254144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012805556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015222664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011528048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042838812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904656709","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2018.11.002","title":"The finite horizon, undiscounted, durable goods monopoly problem with finitely many consumers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Digital Platforms and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Monopoly; Discounting; Durable good; Subgame perfect equilibrium; Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Horizon; Nash equilibrium; Mathematics","score_opus":0.015407173315655665,"score_gpt":0.20478657797754904,"score_spread":0.18937940466189337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904656709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5453319,0.0040305573,0.3456965,0.025150664,0.00048049237,0.00026105548,0.002843624,0.00043531868,0.075769946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95319664,0.00083492656,0.016338466,0.0005201669,0.00026099745,0.00014782303,0.0003839869,0.0000790514,0.028237918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979824,0.00083331275,0.00009919455,0.00047073033,0.00022426735,0.00039011333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97225046,0.02371662,0.0015322975,0.00059717085,0.000492794,0.0014105951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035608725,0.0011356858,0.0046998756,0.0010081899,0.0015469203,0.0065974053,0.004394992,0.008709561,0.014641432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020604571,0.0020325098,0.001463852,0.0015155107,0.0044061416,0.010300199,0.0026484418,0.005285895,0.00066995935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075706537,0.0003060971,0.001127547,0.00048749763,0.00019309593,0.0011323149,0.00030274136,0.19166102,0.0007356577,0.7892317,0.005950741,0.008114585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024729283,0.00008582639,0.0004065089,0.00007169641,0.00005939274,0.00020652101,0.00017301069,0.39467478,0.00024533563,0.6025388,0.0012213972,0.00006949253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004353143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004432414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014641432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044095814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026428956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048980474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910907529","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2019.10.003","title":"The consumption–investment decision of a prospect theory household: A two-period model with an endogenous second period reference level","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Housing Market and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"Austrian Science Fund","keywords":"Period (music); Economics; Consumption (sociology); Investment (military); Econometrics; Microeconomics; Political science","score_opus":0.09615015839859035,"score_gpt":0.24280358487857348,"score_spread":0.14665342647998314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910907529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89522,0.000767499,0.07748539,0.009099811,0.0001360309,0.00015619329,0.0018000504,0.00014374332,0.01519117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97595245,0.0004897564,0.003618318,0.00022489874,0.000086827495,0.00006616994,0.0003237393,0.000024398503,0.01921348],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989035,0.0004899586,0.000038340968,0.00024170706,0.000052957483,0.00027349376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956727,0.0025361178,0.0006232171,0.00014560095,0.00015316073,0.0008692692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025547128,0.00095027086,0.002455565,0.0008147357,0.00084319495,0.004324538,0.0029773205,0.0065760235,0.008696959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054743136,0.0015557071,0.001294765,0.0015256889,0.0025616225,0.0043119825,0.0021409509,0.002949609,0.001011708],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002177971,0.0009415755,0.019307977,0.00021794636,0.0003996806,0.0025467493,0.00093368255,0.77751666,0.0022528288,0.18230234,0.0035184862,0.0078840265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002015443,0.00040624288,0.005335297,0.000030031257,0.00013449645,0.00019266314,0.00043974494,0.96298116,0.00018714754,0.029332902,0.00063840556,0.000120331184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02037545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012133216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02037545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002202346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014746751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040513694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914842256","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2019.01.003","title":"Adaptive stochastic search","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Satisficing; Preference; Maximization; Mathematical optimization; Set (abstract data type); Mathematics; Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Econometrics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1082013021968553,"score_gpt":0.2259863795796958,"score_spread":0.11778507738284051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914842256","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056366984,0.0024925517,0.88175184,0.004957073,0.00086068665,0.00008754056,0.00019324705,0.00043876475,0.052851297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8874649,0.0013223173,0.06468519,0.0007037004,0.00069952983,0.00016837042,0.0002221235,0.00017696635,0.04455701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994998,0.00021847592,0.00002416465,0.00010997768,0.00009636968,0.000051202736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99519354,0.003678992,0.0003051469,0.00030668266,0.00032231936,0.00019326044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013225318,0.0004928598,0.0010393115,0.00080507336,0.00047079322,0.001521331,0.00090927596,0.0017467919,0.012794614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013517962,0.00043328112,0.000663938,0.0007936387,0.0016040968,0.0019447134,0.0013966238,0.0016785557,0.0010709026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001596527,0.00010540129,0.0011302021,0.00012308119,0.00012509314,0.00009376677,0.000052020318,0.2755231,0.0011336241,0.668436,0.009966387,0.043151684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055458593,0.00003541303,0.00031339575,0.000017234557,0.000022278853,0.00004604612,0.000013035493,0.7673773,0.00020067437,0.22946432,0.0024429946,0.000011792994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012322008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00093026954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012794614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008179741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010769438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042802274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2929275403","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2019.03.006","title":"Consensus in social networks: Revisited","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Convergence (economics); Mathematical economics; Social network (sociolinguistics); Bayesian network; Permissive; Bayesian probability; Computer science; Economics; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Artificial intelligence; Biology","score_opus":0.011140824609795834,"score_gpt":0.26076482832900455,"score_spread":0.2496240037192087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2929275403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34138122,0.020206846,0.29469663,0.19790773,0.0034150148,0.00012606812,0.0007170401,0.0003689977,0.14118038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9744264,0.0040350882,0.00890004,0.0018711748,0.0021968763,0.00007358519,0.00007106389,0.00007145247,0.008354406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972277,0.0013061233,0.00010320473,0.0005694106,0.00048800634,0.00030553772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9707518,0.021234289,0.0019662015,0.001682715,0.0029946843,0.0013703149],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006801045,0.0005574368,0.0022989747,0.0021299417,0.0024533488,0.0054530078,0.0039449236,0.0068933717,0.009855806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04151122,0.0005798211,0.0009975495,0.0030676997,0.0059029125,0.015116495,0.0033340508,0.0036955064,0.00084507954],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039857397,0.000031624775,0.00095127383,0.00014284157,0.000041876367,0.000086781925,0.0003701751,0.005144983,0.00010949799,0.9731054,0.0051860525,0.014789688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002710628,0.000015199069,0.00052499585,0.000042068314,0.00002363733,0.000059463815,0.00030557328,0.02282985,0.00005231923,0.97308064,0.0030222172,0.00001686377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039568054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003366731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009855806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023982113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014827726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035967767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963124583","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2019.07.002","title":"Choice on the simplex domain","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Rationalizability; Axiom; Monotonic function; Mathematics; Simplex; Preference; Axiom of choice; Choice function; Mathematical economics; Domain (mathematical analysis); Revealed preference; Combinatorics; Function (biology); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Econometrics; Nash equilibrium; Statistics; Set theory","score_opus":0.0392807111881346,"score_gpt":0.226416320050177,"score_spread":0.1871356088620424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963124583","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17137569,0.00081928715,0.6994629,0.0034590603,0.00019231219,0.00014265337,0.0008831078,0.0002148733,0.12345013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8768939,0.0010346374,0.07490336,0.00031972915,0.00022356331,0.0002739048,0.00065867143,0.00024199576,0.04545024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813014,0.00093978026,0.000077224446,0.0002977156,0.00037550883,0.00017961473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99463814,0.0033227657,0.000306252,0.00050289725,0.0005097592,0.0007201836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018262151,0.0006422195,0.0017863571,0.0017847074,0.0014969227,0.007188974,0.0014220895,0.0014287496,0.014632245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008300017,0.00058697345,0.0012101717,0.0015232685,0.00305279,0.004433875,0.0025748427,0.0033119188,0.0018105488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025275947,0.000016553055,0.000102481885,0.000012959984,0.00001002959,0.0000192886,0.000040747724,0.0035874331,0.00016844213,0.992622,0.000658161,0.0027366125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012614659,0.000005920152,0.000047220346,0.0000068636405,0.0000024261687,0.00002112977,0.000028101635,0.023610024,0.00010624144,0.9750352,0.0011189999,0.0000051467314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019656536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011644014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014632245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019776188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013322941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048949778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981095392","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2019.10.001","title":"Bidding collusion without passive updating","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Collusion; Bidding; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Bayesian game; Path (computing); Class (philosophy); Mechanism design; Complete information; Private information retrieval; Economics; Computer science; Game theory; Repeated game; Artificial intelligence; Computer security","score_opus":0.056887231058295185,"score_gpt":0.35436200366252335,"score_spread":0.29747477260422817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981095392","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33493325,0.00061760284,0.59400666,0.0028388766,0.00049499486,0.000321411,0.00035478428,0.00068108214,0.06575141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725461,0.00013705628,0.012588416,0.00020057306,0.00019246715,0.00009130727,0.00007023636,0.00006459218,0.014109219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959622,0.0014923332,0.0003240523,0.00077772886,0.0009017495,0.0005419945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96651024,0.020376997,0.0029009713,0.0077471747,0.001735164,0.00072950893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00603217,0.0008385909,0.002262624,0.00093616685,0.0008916253,0.0046530226,0.002529085,0.0031482875,0.0082820365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04140756,0.0012739688,0.0010961279,0.001222716,0.0024878879,0.008970627,0.0028627068,0.0028031387,0.0019474919],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020247248,0.0004322676,0.0047867135,0.0003888949,0.00031280637,0.001289664,0.0004556287,0.051943555,0.008858411,0.8601234,0.0067882785,0.06259563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002758003,0.00018926358,0.00103675,0.000025365727,0.00013289486,0.0009068348,0.00007294277,0.35042515,0.002238887,0.6427842,0.001854793,0.00005710076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037915425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002797724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0082820365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068641966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009922766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03190154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003353436","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2020.01.005","title":"Acyclicity, anonymity, and prefilters","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science","keywords":"Anonymity; Pareto principle; Mathematical economics; Social choice theory; Pareto efficiency; Population; Class (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Property (philosophy); Finite set; Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical optimization; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05804514265662339,"score_gpt":0.216264277127635,"score_spread":0.1582191344710116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003353436","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40415505,0.0011120633,0.5555769,0.0034334462,0.00022023976,0.00009210658,0.0008384364,0.0005318741,0.03403992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9553086,0.0004787985,0.03493112,0.00037571328,0.0003586187,0.000093599876,0.00037741582,0.00009466059,0.007981376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960581,0.001723689,0.00027490922,0.0009537515,0.0004968797,0.00049271004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9450548,0.03922451,0.0051975213,0.0061960467,0.0024788054,0.0018482971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006262649,0.00036699258,0.0010916387,0.002350285,0.002664685,0.00402527,0.0012746917,0.0017102202,0.008120337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028074697,0.0005390037,0.0011073785,0.0020131615,0.004174841,0.0107159065,0.0021193912,0.0031248678,0.0006461475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011438889,0.000046154742,0.00083838485,0.000037936577,0.000014768425,0.000059134632,0.0002993211,0.0024117692,0.00048180606,0.9832703,0.0011397531,0.011286377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012085861,0.000016863843,0.00020505767,0.000007093605,0.000008235226,0.00004690655,0.0000391685,0.00595299,0.00019547548,0.9926294,0.00087249925,0.000014145511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012570119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009066715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008120337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013224606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001057623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033120453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3054332779","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2021.102617","title":"Distance-based social index numbers: A unifying approach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Fractionalization; Parameterized complexity; Index (typography); Inequality; Partition (number theory); Econometrics; Class (philosophy); Population; Mathematics; Social class; Point (geometry); Diversity (politics); Mathematical economics; Economics; Computer science; Sociology; Demography; Combinatorics; Artificial intelligence; Ethnic group","score_opus":0.07275073042216591,"score_gpt":0.3258526927196353,"score_spread":0.2531019622974694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3054332779","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0136699,0.0028571682,0.9544263,0.0019970958,0.0005296434,0.000057524823,0.0002590636,0.0000722799,0.026131026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42328498,0.0073023723,0.5393727,0.0008714152,0.0027984148,0.00047515196,0.0005730173,0.0002647198,0.025057249],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974859,0.0010910139,0.00019033508,0.00041108966,0.0006882349,0.00013333914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99437124,0.0029766068,0.00044126695,0.0008413595,0.0010537932,0.00031566736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004229713,0.0011033718,0.0018786822,0.0061275125,0.0020403652,0.00607221,0.002701641,0.0018952045,0.004812056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014597147,0.00052706053,0.001547441,0.0055508194,0.0046224305,0.011748725,0.0045611383,0.003735333,0.001016307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030751312,0.0000049802898,0.00007322699,0.00001583308,0.000004204044,0.0000065616,0.00004041492,0.0011053146,0.000057454607,0.9928953,0.000497616,0.0052961423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023429375,0.0000065476474,0.00006887251,0.0000131925735,0.0000046942273,0.000017841347,0.000028650162,0.013593948,0.000040510655,0.98299026,0.0032266972,0.0000064517076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013508648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011796093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061275125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028792543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001160461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022369087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110703196","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2014.08.005","title":"A characterization of exact non-atomic market games","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Characterization (materials science); Mathematics; Banach space; Pure mathematics; Countable set; Discrete mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.01564100168352522,"score_gpt":0.20338288130289234,"score_spread":0.1877418796193671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110703196","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37771907,0.000416165,0.55280095,0.0017901824,0.00014683786,0.00023809375,0.000539552,0.0002878194,0.066061325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9566229,0.0002688047,0.029548956,0.00034796714,0.0001764994,0.00019589315,0.0003856701,0.00009095137,0.012362305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782073,0.0005534169,0.00017868937,0.00041966606,0.00053388585,0.0004937298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883631,0.00710184,0.0013160488,0.0009833307,0.0011875969,0.0010480931],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020828727,0.00083926035,0.0017496811,0.0018932483,0.0017139422,0.00454756,0.0036836243,0.002119973,0.011382881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016414283,0.0008602303,0.0013017426,0.0018219434,0.0032364724,0.008058972,0.0026782332,0.0037501904,0.00074694486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034925848,0.000043315504,0.0002960399,0.000028933346,0.000010451377,0.000055475866,0.00014029097,0.0051398817,0.00047204405,0.99079204,0.0007105351,0.0022759587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019731055,0.000020215344,0.00018751733,0.000010034634,0.000007201778,0.00006650511,0.00005782182,0.07196849,0.00016848683,0.92679316,0.00068825344,0.000012492425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017759749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013904002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011382881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017604707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016690238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0380795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124610736","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2019.02.002","title":"Bargaining with learning","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Complete information; Imperfect; Simple (philosophy)","score_opus":0.05566783136835925,"score_gpt":0.32955212144348167,"score_spread":0.27388429007512244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124610736","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063670196,0.0030193657,0.54452145,0.014540514,0.00091368135,0.00014938899,0.00021514906,0.00023343856,0.3727368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8687482,0.0015387968,0.030537805,0.00097162195,0.001060439,0.0001919201,0.00013655833,0.00006992126,0.09674464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980532,0.001011586,0.00007432187,0.00028064192,0.0003943888,0.00018585971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934528,0.0050070626,0.00033247675,0.0006051408,0.00034395774,0.0002586629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028215232,0.00071121,0.0013039445,0.0007508948,0.0011831186,0.004087726,0.0012194436,0.0026217564,0.017527368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014052451,0.0003717471,0.0008665415,0.00092969794,0.003879526,0.0061275214,0.0020684563,0.0035552415,0.0018158609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027085769,0.000026742016,0.00007211371,0.000025649622,0.0000100321395,0.00002133524,0.00005021699,0.0067488886,0.00009060781,0.9832086,0.0015648678,0.008153793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009481246,0.00000684121,0.000026210211,0.0000073691513,0.0000028503832,0.000015486428,0.000015461741,0.01581022,0.000038976676,0.9827796,0.0012840274,0.0000034266143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005694241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003446949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017527368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018364987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001003272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058634877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3140798861","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2023.102892","title":"Common assumption of rationality","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Lexicographical order; Impossibility; Rationality; Iterated function; Type (biology); Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Computer science; Combinatorics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Biology; Political science","score_opus":0.21185990613665406,"score_gpt":0.42890268902350537,"score_spread":0.2170427828868513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3140798861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06055895,0.0011762202,0.42833632,0.023927996,0.0006927764,0.0004781345,0.0011426512,0.00031402402,0.4833729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91639256,0.00075183663,0.044190105,0.0025172436,0.00071713014,0.00079811446,0.00049853453,0.000107855354,0.034026686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98686635,0.0035627545,0.0010412966,0.0035028628,0.0034059677,0.0016206689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96564376,0.016248425,0.0020181332,0.010046651,0.0051638107,0.0008792633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008073699,0.0011616793,0.0034583567,0.0019040701,0.0027803774,0.007289157,0.0032513724,0.006422848,0.013238977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038675006,0.0011195291,0.0030175564,0.001434208,0.008454468,0.011247848,0.0040215557,0.008185323,0.0032731504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019229648,0.000018244538,0.00014624953,0.000025518013,0.000031466097,0.00005195066,0.000116573836,0.0008897811,0.0000763894,0.9954074,0.0014360298,0.001781042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001536973,0.0000070252418,0.000083689265,0.000013747412,0.000012002512,0.00006282411,0.000041678257,0.0026495599,0.000080717546,0.99512935,0.0018966906,0.0000074147156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020139646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001062274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013238977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002786565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038278787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044288754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281629502","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2022.102728","title":"General competing mechanism games with strategy-proof punishment","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Microeconomics; Economics; Mechanism design; Mathematical economics; Complete information; Profit (economics); Monopoly; Ex-ante; Class (philosophy); Incentive; Mechanism (biology); Incentive compatibility; Private information retrieval; Strategic dominance; Computer science","score_opus":0.07034911560487102,"score_gpt":0.32485067297091613,"score_spread":0.25450155736604513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281629502","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.119466126,0.0017764673,0.81518483,0.0048513543,0.0004040754,0.00039963622,0.0007662923,0.00035672454,0.05679457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9150747,0.0015095038,0.04241524,0.00081436045,0.00037617292,0.00042314312,0.00032715884,0.00008340482,0.038976282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945517,0.0026693046,0.00030695696,0.000810397,0.00077233696,0.0008892867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987941,0.007942342,0.0014837348,0.0011064281,0.00094104925,0.00058550393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059125065,0.0025095157,0.0037907604,0.0016098759,0.0012530688,0.006524622,0.0055322233,0.0069161844,0.0072902716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01911669,0.0015127317,0.0026850011,0.0022091938,0.0036959404,0.008790486,0.002888695,0.0039580553,0.0011017281],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011829083,0.000093902316,0.00035930038,0.00017431425,0.00010835284,0.0004190472,0.0001306647,0.08172277,0.00077235716,0.90991396,0.001836017,0.004351042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015102833,0.000050077284,0.00020562448,0.000025232099,0.00004595293,0.00024509197,0.000041019648,0.16235963,0.00012034622,0.8353036,0.0014130526,0.00003951697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020370744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015655435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072902716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024245959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024559188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031268716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4284991771","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2022.102742","title":"Insurance with heterogeneous preferences","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Insurance and Financial Risk Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Actua; University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Risk aversion (psychology); Economics; Monopolistic competition; Actuarial science; Expected utility hypothesis; Insurance premium; Piecewise linear function; Insurance policy; Auto insurance risk selection; Econometrics; Piecewise; Microeconomics; Key person insurance; Mathematical economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.026708228108017023,"score_gpt":0.2027981503344224,"score_spread":0.17608992222640538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4284991771","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5258325,0.0020114018,0.43234515,0.0041033556,0.00016161875,0.00013299113,0.00059778703,0.00013360182,0.034681484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9681293,0.00051784574,0.021805601,0.00019904182,0.00010057977,0.000092971146,0.00014305946,0.000017771592,0.008993915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746966,0.001220438,0.000107905245,0.00048603624,0.00030362624,0.00041243972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930346,0.004841168,0.0008806733,0.0004176553,0.00025297803,0.00057297817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002870906,0.0010210371,0.0022140204,0.0006910451,0.0010980269,0.002623278,0.002206697,0.0034666853,0.0051671136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008870462,0.0008772054,0.0015114488,0.00089939847,0.0024419355,0.00390144,0.00190869,0.002771419,0.0005144866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002538342,0.00028650434,0.0024580082,0.00013323796,0.00016202684,0.00068887515,0.000171125,0.4169797,0.0011452601,0.5679765,0.0012359524,0.008509017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016644274,0.00012788191,0.00091275666,0.000035216024,0.000050790113,0.00018108814,0.00010925684,0.76695037,0.00030511303,0.22962837,0.0014970922,0.000035601384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029528558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016500367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051671136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00217376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009209891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017285764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366490424","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2023.102847","title":"Level-<mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" display=\"inline\" id=\"d1e208\" altimg=\"si394.svg\"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math> predatory trading","year":2023,"lang":"lv","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Financial Markets and Investment Strategies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"Predation; Arbitrage; Volatility (finance); Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Econometrics; Biology; Economics; Ecology; Financial economics","score_opus":0.04334318530934053,"score_gpt":0.2411329660429397,"score_spread":0.19778978073359918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366490424","genre_codex":"software","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014058669,0.00023463643,0.15420994,0.003275865,0.0011163601,0.00039302956,0.19052145,0.3535292,0.2953135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02521599,0.00058226316,0.123665035,0.0025722208,0.0006683477,0.00084250193,0.26035595,0.24284485,0.34325287],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888736,0.00014966841,0.00014096807,0.00018729598,0.00048616246,0.00014846757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957585,0.0010690041,0.00017193088,0.0012498908,0.0014246159,0.00032616354],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011526116,0.0020786962,0.0014944823,0.0017862014,0.0010701984,0.008289007,0.004160527,0.0028934828,0.7011479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006990569,0.0016680697,0.0019203621,0.0024839232,0.00060756033,0.006976479,0.0032184476,0.003716094,0.6172863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012016879,0.00005201644,0.0002619189,0.00034407811,0.000015146758,0.000054180487,0.000098102944,0.000506417,0.0015477072,0.019779531,0.9457225,0.031498235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065969616,0.00001836332,0.00054076593,0.0001164549,0.000009205468,0.00009044002,0.000045586785,0.003222622,0.006442614,0.015955828,0.97344613,0.000045916597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076397075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008353049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7011479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002086262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016516903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4262762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387497916","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2023.102909","title":"A dual approach to agency problems","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Dual (grammatical number); Mathematical optimization; Constraint (computer-aided design); Uniqueness; Principal–agent problem; Convex optimization; Regular polygon; Simple (philosophy); Agency (philosophy); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.06479482765627677,"score_gpt":0.2323121892705191,"score_spread":0.16751736161424235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387497916","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010394542,0.0012390977,0.91673404,0.006365877,0.00031279426,0.000065292654,0.00011153347,0.0000373539,0.06473942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71503794,0.0025448694,0.23817122,0.001976915,0.00157673,0.00049681053,0.00015794652,0.00012884816,0.03990866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99599224,0.002497836,0.00011512442,0.0005137539,0.00060635916,0.00027470812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99637955,0.00213042,0.00032601642,0.00046528675,0.0004594294,0.00023923037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034681584,0.0009789845,0.0009974897,0.001040891,0.0012390693,0.0040911925,0.0016493229,0.0028263396,0.00717991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075472593,0.0005591356,0.0015407804,0.0008274801,0.004525892,0.0045636916,0.0029169216,0.0063810092,0.00074189855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044393773,0.000010697271,0.000039248775,0.0000147929995,0.0000055236246,0.00001746429,0.000035746336,0.003985815,0.00006825903,0.9939668,0.0005463025,0.0013048566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015843545,0.000016429603,0.00004440039,0.000025898074,0.000006392263,0.00006218114,0.000033953733,0.04587094,0.00011452131,0.94655925,0.0072408733,0.000009228767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010664206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096688134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00717991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029458322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024700523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024019241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393537273","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2024.102980","title":"The reciprocity set","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Reciprocal; Distributive justice; Mathematical economics; Set (abstract data type); Distributive property; Computer science; Law and economics; Microeconomics; Economics; Economic Justice; Mathematics; Social psychology; Psychology; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.06116704158976148,"score_gpt":0.3670777470063868,"score_spread":0.3059107054166253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393537273","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1869724,0.001573994,0.3012026,0.012834676,0.0005032232,0.00029759278,0.0015326664,0.00039382515,0.49468902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.946783,0.00060856005,0.025827792,0.00067813066,0.00037033964,0.00044859672,0.0005200162,0.00010516874,0.024658326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99304575,0.0032625832,0.00039857288,0.0016277328,0.0010841219,0.00058117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9743959,0.0151163535,0.0015338544,0.005629064,0.0022188143,0.0011060472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055992897,0.0007589191,0.0019918573,0.002814507,0.0046122554,0.0072877146,0.0019577956,0.003256411,0.019991871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030030254,0.0008316459,0.0015200025,0.0019327722,0.008919393,0.014324488,0.0044603925,0.0046569835,0.002669557],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010434294,0.0000062036715,0.00008151202,0.000008527454,0.0000070843353,0.0000119009155,0.00007280218,0.00027106697,0.000042084026,0.99727494,0.00063762546,0.0015757794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010172677,0.000004836376,0.000062710526,0.000006824404,0.0000058739215,0.000041146297,0.000034396955,0.0019537418,0.0000429272,0.9965391,0.0012925538,0.0000058084956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010991079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005610377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019991871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018618354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002218749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06687951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394008684","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2024.102983","title":"Smallest quasi-transitive extensions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Advanced Algebra and Logic","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Transitive relation; Transitive closure; Extension (predicate logic); Closure (psychology); Mathematics; Context (archaeology); Operator (biology); Property (philosophy); Path (computing); Mathematical economics; Pure mathematics; Discrete mathematics; Combinatorics; Computer science; Epistemology; Economics","score_opus":0.018510853443297236,"score_gpt":0.24884564604514683,"score_spread":0.2303347926018496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394008684","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43687227,0.0028553375,0.22195664,0.0065285903,0.0008414518,0.00025015915,0.003164393,0.001651109,0.32588017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9166391,0.0009331736,0.0363683,0.00078016316,0.0004946733,0.00014060673,0.0018229237,0.00044944874,0.042371657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99761343,0.000547995,0.00026376543,0.00071770704,0.000504594,0.0003525356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926086,0.004097483,0.0005135423,0.0012947714,0.00064811186,0.0008374978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019560384,0.0009289512,0.002209977,0.002435401,0.004537984,0.007427427,0.0016925345,0.001575371,0.014085383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005379654,0.0015091749,0.0024762189,0.0023571297,0.0045436113,0.013673025,0.0040748045,0.0052947225,0.0019373795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095249125,0.000037839385,0.00027796093,0.0000606137,0.000022520344,0.000105513645,0.00043401815,0.00019676276,0.00090570486,0.99193734,0.0015019127,0.004424592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030021829,0.000019289468,0.00021636383,0.000019747562,0.000031029434,0.00025743683,0.00015237418,0.00047716126,0.0006276489,0.99281234,0.005343662,0.00001300732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007760644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010829592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014085383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015553709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012315249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047120273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402254436","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2026.103246","title":"Equity Auctions with Bidder Moral Hazard","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Moral hazard; Common value auction; Equity (law); Business; Economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Incentive; Law","score_opus":0.05095001067397433,"score_gpt":0.2561915318031489,"score_spread":0.20524152112917457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402254436","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24131022,0.002128554,0.6698321,0.007948673,0.000881849,0.00030511405,0.00074960163,0.00073207513,0.076111816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91004705,0.00071572745,0.023410236,0.0006485401,0.0011175545,0.00016103906,0.00018597917,0.00017832965,0.06353553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99541277,0.0025200397,0.00022019756,0.0004655003,0.0006735334,0.00070791173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96593326,0.026066015,0.0026108625,0.002435479,0.0015216541,0.0014326908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008438243,0.0014959822,0.004773453,0.0017151484,0.001514769,0.008344608,0.0033381982,0.0064165094,0.018269084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047114726,0.0020122046,0.0017583291,0.0021660938,0.00432414,0.01295422,0.0036016894,0.005099049,0.0017428751],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028136367,0.00016016825,0.00067484175,0.00011472402,0.000060133192,0.00052610086,0.00013466146,0.030958833,0.000602774,0.95640945,0.004131556,0.0059453878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016726062,0.00003965244,0.00021131367,0.000016106118,0.000031452553,0.00026953634,0.000041510604,0.15622465,0.00012449197,0.8421245,0.0007198975,0.000029548943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015813292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010293748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018269084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021928572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002118759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06111622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407319896","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2025.103096","title":"Pareto efficiency and financial fairness under limited expected loss constraint","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Economic theories and models","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Université Laval","keywords":"Pareto principle; Economics; Constraint (computer-aided design); Microeconomics; Pareto optimal; Pareto efficiency; Multi-objective optimization; Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Operations management","score_opus":0.020290176614869967,"score_gpt":0.22034858101691138,"score_spread":0.20005840440204142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407319896","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10591237,0.00020431202,0.8816917,0.0005612272,0.000045072265,0.00006280658,0.00005916642,0.000045867444,0.011417534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9564945,0.00014167947,0.04014521,0.00008547247,0.0000311812,0.00009972466,0.000033099026,0.000027606207,0.0029415805],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970741,0.0013625623,0.00012125591,0.00043218659,0.00058760616,0.00042224544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99568486,0.002613049,0.00062767114,0.0004486807,0.00039639592,0.00022931288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005044864,0.00061687804,0.0009980376,0.0005045879,0.0008551731,0.0020284585,0.0011825169,0.0011434768,0.0022701675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014767831,0.00026001633,0.0006588921,0.00050212606,0.002240672,0.00258529,0.001841651,0.001120245,0.00028419454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008748933,0.00005984946,0.0012455762,0.000070205584,0.00004721901,0.0001985416,0.00015611527,0.51348627,0.0022445219,0.4655246,0.0007511348,0.01612846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026996844,0.00005060335,0.00037460055,0.000020674439,0.000009177998,0.0000648199,0.000054258824,0.74006546,0.00089847005,0.25744423,0.0009723458,0.000018277173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012649712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060953177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005044864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011120908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016188517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026680112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410119623","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2025.103132","title":"Return expectations across the wealth distribution","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"Renmin University of China","keywords":"Economics; Distribution (mathematics); Distribution of wealth; Econometrics; Wealth distribution; Financial economics; Mathematics; Inequality; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.048986260358429116,"score_gpt":0.27885388564121516,"score_spread":0.22986762528278604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410119623","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48147294,0.0010366515,0.48835957,0.007995773,0.00019923155,0.000072961724,0.00063077896,0.00032247655,0.01990959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810451,0.0010774686,0.007616251,0.0002883105,0.00028917406,0.000050021026,0.00037109936,0.0000913406,0.009171161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876463,0.0004523735,0.00006464986,0.0002890225,0.00022847799,0.00020084907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.974919,0.017692626,0.0028187959,0.0015065431,0.0018811033,0.0011818641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068820044,0.0007708112,0.00125963,0.0013285404,0.00041184397,0.0039169793,0.0014706651,0.0017469631,0.006910622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060585406,0.00079406315,0.0008664642,0.0010071171,0.0018530382,0.008741065,0.0017372709,0.0035040795,0.0012478491],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045934645,0.00019094668,0.02128357,0.00012458075,0.00019963464,0.00070304703,0.00077600847,0.13745669,0.00238016,0.7985878,0.0040741838,0.03376404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048504215,0.00010545879,0.01030127,0.000060280487,0.00007522367,0.00031320963,0.00022596128,0.37179425,0.0008248863,0.61545795,0.0007396494,0.000053333173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014897437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00077685795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006910622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010101238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005745942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036395907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411868961","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2025.103152","title":"Revealed preference axioms for endogenous consideration set formation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Mathematical economics; Revealed preference; Preference; Set (abstract data type); Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.4683025243735864,"score_gpt":0.43634930970207964,"score_spread":0.03195321467150675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411868961","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070118904,0.00028001147,0.8884524,0.0032404969,0.000105111416,0.0002267451,0.00056338735,0.00012673574,0.03688611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7738424,0.00039461156,0.21655749,0.00068608526,0.0001436699,0.0007884621,0.00047262703,0.000039265666,0.007075366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917216,0.003518562,0.00063157093,0.0012938346,0.002040791,0.00079375476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97406954,0.014609328,0.004145244,0.0031455609,0.0029987844,0.0010315038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008256669,0.00053333,0.00080192543,0.0010467258,0.0012863097,0.0033072394,0.0019817557,0.0017710346,0.0058797975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027076125,0.00053909025,0.0020086707,0.0013408943,0.0044182083,0.0067702006,0.0024981461,0.0035888383,0.000680761],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006746907,0.000009895752,0.00015694219,0.000018852408,0.000009744674,0.00003349714,0.0001256026,0.0019495396,0.00018512354,0.9954709,0.0002434761,0.0017897432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022110473,0.000020785372,0.00019908234,0.000015260162,0.000007009937,0.0000541942,0.00007444572,0.016929254,0.00030345202,0.9803492,0.0020094728,0.000015629541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021697218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021837729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008256669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021973136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027466463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043666005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414482117","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2025.103181","title":"Prudence and higher-order risk attitudes in the rank-dependent utility model","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Actua; University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Weighting; Prudence; Generality; Stochastic dominance; Consistency (knowledge bases); Differentiable function; Expected utility hypothesis; Probability measure; Function (biology); Monotonic function","score_opus":0.12133564214320712,"score_gpt":0.4065820069671549,"score_spread":0.2852463648239478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414482117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64225376,0.0007619256,0.32685086,0.004963297,0.000082895946,0.00008255489,0.000309972,0.00012617817,0.024568476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822072,0.00030015947,0.009518556,0.00013039581,0.00006083036,0.000037378308,0.000067723726,0.000014658523,0.007663075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743456,0.0015661847,0.00009466837,0.00024017923,0.00027918728,0.0003852814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806341,0.0148987705,0.0016260365,0.00093349774,0.0008967033,0.0010108323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005855595,0.0009023022,0.00178011,0.0012895874,0.00078562286,0.0046854303,0.0015646406,0.002524698,0.005431939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021026693,0.00069626013,0.0009547968,0.00095736556,0.0026661567,0.004786201,0.0014488768,0.0030893984,0.0005770122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001951759,0.00024696227,0.0034688525,0.00007575694,0.000087812325,0.000332057,0.00043707012,0.08662189,0.00044945313,0.89841014,0.00085198006,0.0088229105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051657134,0.00009021467,0.0017493934,0.000022113369,0.000030391071,0.00012601988,0.00008951868,0.38721526,0.00009239766,0.610149,0.00033610096,0.000047856025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036860977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025225482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005855595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015980827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009876654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030967712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416757703","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2025.103205","title":"Optimal contracts under general mixed constraints: Continuity, structure, and applications","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Schedule; Budget constraint; Constraint (computer-aided design); Class (philosophy); Adverse selection; Optimal control; Selection (genetic algorithm); Principal (computer security); Quality (philosophy)","score_opus":0.036305174246393165,"score_gpt":0.3428790306051539,"score_spread":0.3065738563587607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416757703","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23028082,0.0028836876,0.7380612,0.0042306334,0.00015007703,0.00016314012,0.0003343661,0.00009443637,0.02380163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8842677,0.0021582274,0.10343596,0.00033675626,0.00036767047,0.00018181925,0.00024307585,0.00008500552,0.0089238295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970439,0.0016844556,0.0001558016,0.0004628908,0.00041830246,0.00023468467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.966402,0.02619861,0.0031823649,0.0013167962,0.0016128,0.0012873934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076730307,0.0009671495,0.0022837513,0.0017309035,0.0010819688,0.004680356,0.0026193499,0.0038023638,0.0049087494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0473389,0.0016260735,0.0012479342,0.0028270576,0.003864907,0.013505384,0.0026176672,0.0047990554,0.00025968705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013680826,0.00012647134,0.00076601584,0.00015108717,0.00004350721,0.00015353509,0.0001995793,0.05517755,0.000667472,0.92733026,0.0011408972,0.014106894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005434021,0.000058008816,0.0002942258,0.000048796825,0.000014263582,0.000109863766,0.00009302274,0.21690571,0.0002504959,0.7813657,0.00078212674,0.00002346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001871212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013750592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076730307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025089728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024212338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04057932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416958545","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2025.103209","title":"The pipeline externalities problem","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Game Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Shapley value; Pipeline (software); Shadow price; Core (optical fiber); Transferable utility; Cooperative game theory; Externality; Set (abstract data type); Production (economics); Bellman equation","score_opus":0.06407532836068425,"score_gpt":0.372199913233345,"score_spread":0.30812458487266076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416958545","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.163411,0.0011993396,0.6493743,0.010514251,0.00024548575,0.0005534112,0.0036320984,0.00039036354,0.17067978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88580734,0.0012676296,0.05244583,0.0007953432,0.00025386317,0.00071339874,0.0015750363,0.00016772564,0.056973837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804986,0.0007642208,0.00008028332,0.0004347212,0.0002849585,0.00038600358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980312,0.001064543,0.00032680327,0.00012270466,0.00019988976,0.00025487825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001707505,0.0014976022,0.0013827896,0.0010478252,0.0015792879,0.0029099474,0.0023248387,0.0040396564,0.020631367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005174536,0.0008624257,0.0011098238,0.0022964485,0.0019469536,0.0049783424,0.0038493595,0.0022310736,0.0012855754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020619581,0.00017168366,0.0018321639,0.00026869407,0.00011624953,0.00086239626,0.00027755598,0.40379125,0.00084087136,0.55585027,0.013215329,0.022567306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016132562,0.00013344143,0.00096831284,0.00010484131,0.00006807129,0.00065291004,0.00048410613,0.3505282,0.00084443536,0.6113032,0.03469318,0.000057989557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043163965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030176865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020631367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024060614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019156748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06901884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}