{"meta":{"query_hash":"22bae691c569","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Mathematical Sociology"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/22bae691c569","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Mathematical+Sociology"},"results":[{"id":"W2077787974","doi":"10.1080/0022250x.2001.9990243","title":"Random graph models for temporal processes in social networks","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Sociology","topic":"Complex Network Analysis Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":199,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Graph; Random graph; Theoretical computer science","score_opus":0.03364774990292631,"score_gpt":0.3177440464959458,"score_spread":0.2840962965930195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077787974","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11749858,0.0001445295,0.88031507,0.0006759768,0.000027510783,0.00016377331,0.0000016286813,0.000011073551,0.0011618678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901845,0.000014440277,0.00891118,0.00006393615,0.00074370304,0.000028113765,0.0000059937256,0.000012694076,0.00003544056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880016,0.000093861076,0.0006495323,0.00009808834,0.00010238868,0.00025596697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873304,0.0005945203,0.00038653845,0.0000637863,0.00017326041,0.00004885941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007422274,0.00011882371,0.00060564576,0.00009280006,0.00008167011,0.00001554588,0.00019405135,0.000091224574,0.00019164271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037833845,0.000090572816,0.0003026029,0.0001567949,0.00012828472,0.000096912096,0.000028359016,0.0002562358,0.0000010360217],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018990804,0.0030103514,0.044565916,0.00026145112,0.001484621,0.000038131628,0.008125759,0.028664332,0.00007144694,0.8567693,0.036307678,0.018801894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012345555,0.00008263619,0.00007192693,0.000030476122,0.000060128477,0.000007386872,0.00027700095,0.02771861,0.0000064960923,0.9698175,0.0005977079,0.000095545096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003960529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000024032279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8726859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023393119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005307415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36934522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2276115472","doi":"10.1080/0022250x.2012.728886","title":"<i>Dynamical Processes on Complex Networks</i>(4th ed.) by A. Barrat, M. Barthélemy, &amp; A. Vespignani","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Sociology","topic":"Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; International Centre for Comparative Criminology","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01585740405915534,"score_gpt":0.28124808841887333,"score_spread":0.265390684359718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2276115472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8696792,0.00030110145,0.11561182,0.005464426,0.00039099378,0.00040333098,0.000043933742,0.000032758086,0.008072423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99645907,0.000037586746,0.0018392304,0.0008326754,0.00052889367,0.00001621655,0.000028820818,0.000023263028,0.00023427432],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984459,0.00013421556,0.0006748746,0.00015731616,0.00021793175,0.00036973527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835247,0.00059168186,0.0004149278,0.00014479658,0.00027931645,0.0002168132],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030354637,0.00019879788,0.00054125296,0.000030588795,0.00014892546,0.000064025015,0.0003171471,0.00014073543,0.0034115796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001029188,0.00014771166,0.00018673479,0.00007972661,0.00033821864,0.00012979149,0.00005348349,0.00051395415,0.00028085685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006999666,0.0020138351,0.008571645,0.00015499943,0.00057452876,0.000005406969,0.0022648242,0.0017018256,0.0016141451,0.4400265,0.53960174,0.0034005833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018673933,0.00096363865,0.002362356,0.00026665005,0.00010491359,0.000030345547,0.0015987287,0.015319148,0.00004296735,0.92587763,0.050709132,0.0008571213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011744441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.3985125e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48889259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003586294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008589319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99749947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2518206426","doi":"10.1080/0022250x.2016.1205049","title":"Opinion strength influences the spatial dynamics of opinion formation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Sociology","topic":"Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Conviction; Computer science; Affect (linguistics); Dynamics (music); Binary number; Psychology; Econometrics; Social psychology; Statistical physics; Mathematics; Political science; Physics; Law; Communication","score_opus":0.017195770196429202,"score_gpt":0.30212488126047315,"score_spread":0.28492911106404395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2518206426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71976036,0.00006315705,0.27121496,0.0069735483,0.0006950722,0.00013662344,0.00004439601,0.000006048329,0.0011058339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989517,0.000044572527,0.0006091389,0.00003501984,0.0003332774,0.0000026287607,0.0000045308134,0.0000054270167,0.000013758393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887,0.00012339378,0.00062694796,0.000059182243,0.00017760284,0.00014285893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998365,0.000578717,0.0007199985,0.00010499696,0.00018521782,0.00004606702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051306916,0.00008838418,0.0002721323,0.00003398094,0.00007799813,0.000010612412,0.000239527,0.000074156844,0.00023426002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009561273,0.000043131982,0.00016347003,0.000042068164,0.0003346621,0.00016490444,0.000044075932,0.00014876781,0.000010084854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027512988,0.00013507539,0.006507443,0.000033770535,0.00009043318,1.8219284e-7,0.0016919331,0.000030568353,0.00031475196,0.96420467,0.00029952475,0.026664156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007487753,0.00032141982,0.005975369,0.00022649983,0.000021892729,0.000008070744,0.0020799679,0.004142517,0.00021658279,0.9850184,0.0011103301,0.00013018616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016697546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000011801246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2791913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039401737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059558144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25649828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}