{"meta":{"query_hash":"c09c2ab7b23a","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Media Law"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c09c2ab7b23a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Media+Law"},"results":[{"id":"W3132745438","doi":"10.1080/17577632.2021.1884947","title":"The ‘right to be forgotten’ beyond the EU: an analysis of wider G20 regulatory action and potential next steps","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Media Law","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Enforcement; Convention; Data Protection Act 1998; Right to be forgotten; Political science; Phenomenon; General Data Protection Regulation; Legislation; The Internet; Action (physics); Business; International trade; Law and economics; Internet privacy; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02934749734128902,"score_gpt":0.30574884969962746,"score_spread":0.27640135235833846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132745438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9626033,0.00071988546,0.00028391948,0.03458952,0.0011227791,0.000099047276,0.000012708876,0.0000061157916,0.00056275335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99754465,0.0005879272,0.00020284337,0.0008832054,0.0007162347,0.000001563819,0.000004154345,0.0000046542473,0.00005474119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983427,0.00043147776,0.00030386262,0.000106361294,0.0006640153,0.00015156358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987009,0.0002994888,0.00028749328,0.00025126414,0.00030964988,0.00015115987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001838509,0.00006461177,0.0001848744,0.0000807847,0.00068131345,0.00017301035,0.00033165058,0.00007679574,0.00007191689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000701427,0.000038198647,0.00012612542,0.00045843303,0.0002704446,0.00064093183,0.000087839224,0.00020228249,7.527743e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015658556,0.0011010541,0.01359739,0.00010362343,0.005571165,0.000282815,0.17510135,0.0004777661,0.06604434,0.50946766,0.061636444,0.16505052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012772148,0.00035976025,0.15898716,0.00004573007,0.0029779808,0.00008266087,0.07024052,0.00046637724,0.011399945,0.048845593,0.7049425,0.00037450402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056380645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02538768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6433061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005506688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015368273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9923965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389485004","doi":"10.1080/17577632.2023.2288395","title":"<i>Hansman v Neufeld</i> : The Supreme Court of Canada protects counterspeech under anti-SLAPP law, but is it even defamatory?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Media Law","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Supreme court; Law; Meaning (existential); Harm; Political science; Reputation; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03361363183975289,"score_gpt":0.2871075647385827,"score_spread":0.25349393289882977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389485004","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7567357,0.00042442916,0.00011901116,0.1645574,0.0047793454,0.00069767423,0.000063428575,0.000055997218,0.07256701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99513245,0.00013440536,0.00008820284,0.0033736893,0.00047168223,0.0000037790044,0.0000013994513,0.000012310509,0.0007820768],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733466,0.00022553364,0.00046441026,0.00010610989,0.0015673968,0.00030190838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982816,0.00046443264,0.000459971,0.00018326267,0.00041661304,0.0001941114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015427337,0.00010724705,0.00026072597,0.000059383023,0.00038342038,0.00006406913,0.00051379524,0.000104532955,0.00025628542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002862613,0.00007282583,0.00010787866,0.00030317748,0.00035725362,0.00027384525,0.000044236447,0.0002722968,0.000015478032],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006852505,0.000058733534,0.00024355222,0.00005371021,0.00008979643,0.00011138718,0.021308778,0.00014949222,0.010550751,0.07844925,0.8887003,0.00021569646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018542813,0.00012840026,0.0023574883,0.0006047361,0.000086698186,0.000059433947,0.06358339,0.0002418557,0.024176173,0.018359121,0.88815445,0.00039397553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15061052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5571237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4065132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001426011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011486261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8550456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393142157","doi":"10.1080/17577632.2024.2326278","title":"States' positive obligation to create a favourable environment for participation in public debate: a principle in search of a practical effect?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Media Law","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.03402967509623426,"score_gpt":0.37475926361428147,"score_spread":0.3407295885180472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393142157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9555594,0.00006819039,0.002126718,0.04101518,0.00018921916,0.0006164241,0.0000099542685,0.000008772049,0.00040615525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99755216,0.000053224383,0.0021455556,0.000081176426,0.0000915837,0.00002275358,0.000005566876,0.000010906136,0.0000370492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833196,0.00039549265,0.00041212662,0.00010819796,0.0005266758,0.00022556406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832183,0.0012608365,0.00010445851,0.000051623516,0.000108653956,0.00015261865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027759708,0.000061386236,0.00017911254,0.00023848076,0.00005060014,0.0000871128,0.00008768216,0.00005487215,0.0000825068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011697485,0.000053885502,0.0000375258,0.00058120926,0.000088889894,0.000549825,0.000018981184,0.00016907253,0.000010415009],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062736496,0.00093211274,0.020582156,0.00022103587,0.00011473022,0.00019725367,0.102386504,0.004119726,0.007070411,0.8558694,0.00046074737,0.0074185324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013331903,0.006383698,0.35829026,0.0037042426,0.0004779168,0.000087212655,0.012996033,0.018601932,0.16266507,0.028121842,0.39392346,0.0014164312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029677124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024254469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8277476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039760862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030136498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2197387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411106413","doi":"10.1080/17577632.2025.2491806","title":"Defining the boundaries of journalism and news publishers: implications of the Online Safety Act 2023 for the public interest and media freedom","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Media Law","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Journalism; Freedom of the press; News media; Public interest; Political science; Public relations; Media studies; Internet privacy; Sociology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.03984848846960129,"score_gpt":0.3267947865136303,"score_spread":0.28694629804402905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411106413","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1166733,0.014204158,0.0016178617,0.8528428,0.005068337,0.0005843944,0.00014179826,0.000011238403,0.008856132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969243,0.0010804039,0.0008221687,0.00075455965,0.0003329093,0.0000036433007,0.0000023804635,0.0000046919868,0.00007494027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987182,0.00021299593,0.00053417846,0.000067870315,0.00033408692,0.00013264274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99485123,0.003658231,0.00071635353,0.00017943289,0.00051440235,0.000080325866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021542287,0.00007007257,0.00019921619,0.00007640728,0.00084116694,0.0004938317,0.0005563598,0.0000753879,0.00003785153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063170316,0.000031810185,0.00010859761,0.00029615816,0.0017735158,0.000615476,0.00010606962,0.0002659467,1.1332971e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000553681,0.000042382857,0.0025025385,0.0000147422425,0.00007713746,1.4791542e-7,0.008055554,0.0000028029663,0.00018968267,0.9209974,0.05150471,0.016557526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012397706,0.00005103235,0.048632525,0.00031804002,0.00015283453,0.00001404488,0.042374626,0.00007909823,0.00011152229,0.078753956,0.8281927,0.00007982687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004656666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03219471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.880251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029498284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005189588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9854652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}