{"meta":{"query_hash":"49ca98097654","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics"},"cohort_total":323,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":323,"exported":323,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/49ca98097654","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Medical+Ethics"},"results":[{"id":"W1424801410","doi":"10.1136/jme.2005.012039","title":"Should children’s autonomy be respected by telling them of their imminent death?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Centre for Phenogenomics","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Personal autonomy; Medicine; Psychology; Internet privacy; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.14843104200357976,"score_gpt":0.4110394647063346,"score_spread":0.26260842270275486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1424801410","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026399705,0.0011676272,0.000109735556,0.9882812,0.00422387,0.0000058176297,0.00001274481,0.0000062061376,0.0035528175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.039181855,0.0018857598,0.00041720746,0.94255507,0.009129811,0.000037836493,0.000014690857,0.000018875888,0.0067589385],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942,0.0018527207,0.00089460064,0.0005470712,0.0010018632,0.0015038284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825545,0.010230575,0.0015922618,0.00036071133,0.0021128831,0.0031490396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007637217,0.00053144054,0.0017079432,0.00037253913,0.0067195003,0.004207253,0.0020816035,0.07493647,0.0039842883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052397788,0.00085663656,0.0014112473,0.00045785244,0.0061798207,0.005407849,0.0024892858,0.06417706,0.0015429284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014103447,0.00012728698,0.008478572,0.0003149479,0.00011676601,0.03947463,0.020860149,0.0004336847,0.0012124653,0.058785506,0.8400795,0.029975457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016076669,0.00017183079,0.0067592775,0.0015528401,0.00012852166,0.028936407,0.021706061,0.00061398273,0.00091362844,0.035875,0.90299004,0.00019171285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022861745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05464043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07493647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007817601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011139443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056720912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963818892","doi":"10.1136/jme.2009.034306","title":"The cost of autonomy: estimates from recent advances in living donor kidney transplantation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hospital for Sick Children","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Autonomy; Donation; Health care; Organ donation; Public relations; Transplantation; Quality of life (healthcare); Resource (disambiguation); Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Nursing; Law; Computer science; Surgery","score_opus":0.023144789692696673,"score_gpt":0.35656722419667447,"score_spread":0.3334224345039778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963818892","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13487193,0.7503924,0.020061137,0.023909938,0.0031912907,0.00008185441,0.0147789745,0.00012051433,0.052592024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6109618,0.3671006,0.006606157,0.001741533,0.0027780733,0.0001510029,0.0069763735,0.000079958845,0.0036045678],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99609154,0.0014601568,0.00038398514,0.00026688355,0.0016179318,0.00017950295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9700228,0.017125674,0.0072495784,0.00075260527,0.0042346525,0.0006146066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006449856,0.0005226082,0.0005463434,0.004450086,0.00020437785,0.0015575005,0.00084712333,0.0011053218,0.0015852026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03447617,0.00028623285,0.0013665551,0.008191826,0.00084371853,0.002738976,0.0017434161,0.0024586057,0.0006842991],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019812763,0.00017362561,0.12501389,0.009970548,0.0023812165,0.0006945253,0.001165315,0.0346766,0.0010094126,0.058474027,0.074941926,0.6895177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011084114,0.0008151802,0.4646563,0.0070159864,0.0027134866,0.0048416164,0.0015994227,0.0115466975,0.004069572,0.025602717,0.4767546,0.00027354207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028052442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021503312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006449856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002613765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008954535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034110546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966069243","doi":"10.1136/jme.2008.028555","title":"“They just don’t get it!” When family disagrees with expert opinion","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"British Columbia Centre of Excellence for Women's Health; University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Credibility; Adversarial system; Humility; Power (physics); Expert opinion; Epistemology; Public relations; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Medicine; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.21527039589684208,"score_gpt":0.5474975107621235,"score_spread":0.33222711486528145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966069243","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2257675,0.003765503,0.034904413,0.5855231,0.0065763225,0.00020820879,0.00016055645,0.00015866668,0.1429358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90507644,0.0010200769,0.0039678374,0.081062116,0.00068022124,0.00011990221,0.000050430164,0.00006110098,0.007961805],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.939816,0.046743337,0.0019959959,0.00246507,0.0066033434,0.0023762584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93168753,0.04233624,0.008536498,0.0028339303,0.01244374,0.0021621257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036072683,0.00037122384,0.00064267754,0.0013826236,0.00905645,0.003480868,0.0012782972,0.0063417903,0.005429322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13875662,0.00038982826,0.00068378873,0.0007738596,0.011985281,0.0069504497,0.004051072,0.007470742,0.00133431],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023546121,0.00007310265,0.017511768,0.00044424811,0.00020134398,0.015064599,0.64673036,0.0003222461,0.003187226,0.09320919,0.15875311,0.064267345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041596446,0.00010406012,0.008793127,0.0013902868,0.0000937926,0.012305879,0.47462937,0.0015160193,0.0023918722,0.11806073,0.38041723,0.00025605256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006334676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076566194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036072683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049608704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003933503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19077289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969163259","doi":"10.1136/jme.27.suppl_1.i24","title":"What triggers requests for ethics consultations?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":155,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Institutes of Health; University of Toronto; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","keywords":"Data science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.3171630085978212,"score_gpt":0.6181500892271521,"score_spread":0.3009870806293309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969163259","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98050356,0.0025689052,0.00090164633,0.0106724,0.000082006045,0.00011286191,0.00019826404,0.000059359874,0.0049009724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961488,0.00094380986,0.0008978823,0.0015605615,0.00013679266,0.000046926965,0.000074881376,0.000010561492,0.00017966484],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825509,0.011573347,0.0019776395,0.00078409805,0.0018295923,0.0012845031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82467294,0.102105446,0.061650723,0.0013086341,0.0038926376,0.0063696033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00575371,0.00024924916,0.00035970198,0.0010085737,0.0014044585,0.0017234334,0.0004906127,0.0019861015,0.0039366223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10352629,0.00046991825,0.00030064187,0.0009224024,0.0009944385,0.0016901289,0.0012416738,0.0013338273,0.00065898057],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032054324,0.00020620767,0.93801016,0.0007248521,0.000053872365,0.0042844,0.017282512,0.00016432251,0.001394931,0.00045646363,0.0049412614,0.032160517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007535273,0.00045841094,0.8906676,0.0014623957,0.00007488372,0.020434976,0.06941822,0.0011312966,0.0012054166,0.0014957368,0.013476371,0.000099293306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002046834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031946916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00575371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015379068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030472018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030428886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977284458","doi":"10.1136/jme.2003.005553","title":"Whistleblowing in academic medicine","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Innovations in Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Data science; Computer science; Medical education; World Wide Web; Medicine; Psychology","score_opus":0.10196327754752878,"score_gpt":0.48580251086842197,"score_spread":0.3838392333208932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977284458","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031608585,0.01876943,0.00820483,0.7498893,0.01335153,0.00013983171,0.000017259576,0.00019873676,0.17782049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6926362,0.008021202,0.004860294,0.25471455,0.010468141,0.00014083227,0.000017569257,0.00013525081,0.029006079],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.91966224,0.056050606,0.0025305666,0.0029005106,0.012946553,0.005909561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91180116,0.050851364,0.014311835,0.0049065696,0.0075195003,0.010609617],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03729937,0.00051928085,0.00060462,0.0023646983,0.02704615,0.018514238,0.0030367752,0.01941952,0.00817991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09551406,0.0005578631,0.00096934504,0.0024966707,0.051903725,0.007509483,0.014556748,0.016705088,0.0015222294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054085125,0.00016639195,0.0058209742,0.00036717218,0.00003821369,0.0025259382,0.04574983,0.0005218027,0.00023877295,0.688604,0.19981769,0.056095198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058919642,0.00021521533,0.0026329083,0.0013480547,0.000040479666,0.0038168717,0.0312699,0.00079895655,0.0005911515,0.24458489,0.7145377,0.0001049412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005916695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008850893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9805805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016606394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021891017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19726026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982314288","doi":"10.1136/jme.29.3.153","title":"Do the sick have a right to cadaveric organs?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Cadaveric spasm; Scarcity; Organ donation; Relation (database); Personal autonomy; Transplantation; Organ transplantation; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Medicine; Sociology; Computer science; Surgery; Economics","score_opus":0.03914437473118005,"score_gpt":0.36366439690554153,"score_spread":0.3245200221743615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982314288","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020010022,0.021349737,0.0039159334,0.88835853,0.0021796895,0.000015281707,0.00007542672,0.0000125633405,0.06408273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6578295,0.03455528,0.0029914845,0.2661472,0.006150324,0.000068013534,0.00012858234,0.000031884778,0.032097608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961584,0.0023546494,0.00017585124,0.00021364582,0.00066939613,0.00042804802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870667,0.0075149303,0.0015556342,0.0010474767,0.0009599224,0.0018552472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008596772,0.00018760396,0.0006314269,0.00045835966,0.0022540232,0.0029156571,0.00068758376,0.0067054764,0.0078858305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030503,0.00019036487,0.00027968758,0.00042184646,0.015514233,0.007941893,0.001965693,0.004896025,0.0016597693],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015786517,0.0001705914,0.009002696,0.00027397703,0.000033515153,0.0007526034,0.009468249,0.00017366048,0.0006574128,0.7705543,0.10891342,0.09984171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004493328,0.00008017981,0.0040169796,0.0005697641,0.000020689511,0.0024440999,0.009124046,0.00019011265,0.00026626288,0.6389823,0.34422258,0.00003803664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020859235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034851544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008596772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010452365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024250606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045464635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984551055","doi":"10.1136/jme.2003.003228","title":"Children’s understanding of the risks and benefits associated with research","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pediatric Pain Management Techniques","field":"Medicine","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"SickKids Foundation; Hospital for Sick Children; University of Toronto; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Medicine; Psychology; Family medicine","score_opus":0.28519864552026497,"score_gpt":0.44326826511460765,"score_spread":0.15806961959434268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984551055","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909322,0.0015395625,0.0013863563,0.0012691322,0.000018570046,0.00006584155,0.00006669574,0.0000074109907,0.00471409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99582565,0.0016293351,0.0017749885,0.00025453168,0.000012531678,0.00006770685,0.00003137029,0.0000028554462,0.00040106056],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99293137,0.0042278934,0.0005430563,0.00033050202,0.0015052161,0.00046191292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.963326,0.023284823,0.00966437,0.00082433503,0.0018467935,0.0010537163],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010070906,0.00026932915,0.00038100214,0.0008406226,0.00057137583,0.0025122077,0.00035651049,0.0011992131,0.0027499278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036895033,0.00037938237,0.0005355158,0.00030000738,0.002375001,0.0019200377,0.0014089879,0.0016091786,0.00023350847],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059401814,0.0004998219,0.47578532,0.0018039304,0.00012442525,0.0031976479,0.42589036,0.00053378014,0.011379352,0.00807783,0.0016732578,0.070440345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015422677,0.0024353457,0.5371365,0.0038320764,0.00042241396,0.011947484,0.38071018,0.0013135305,0.0053280187,0.0074790306,0.049052566,0.00018867952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016498334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018368941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9899291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008779922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016793509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053260684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986586717","doi":"10.1136/jme.2003.006304","title":"Sex and the surgery: students’ attitudes and potential behaviour as they pass through a modern medical curriculum","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Vignette; Curriculum; Ethos; Medical education; Psychology; Subject (documents); Health care; Medical ethics; Medicine; Social psychology; Pedagogy; Computer science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.1714819570910997,"score_gpt":0.4931263735216206,"score_spread":0.3216444164305209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986586717","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996215,0.000027626458,0.00002039806,0.000052279072,0.0000030240087,0.0000073055467,0.000009178068,0.000001027467,0.00025769765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987148,0.000065504675,0.00008184891,0.00005415385,0.0000045004026,0.000013616126,0.000023609517,9.822309e-7,0.0010409323],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991761,0.00020464663,0.00004041261,0.000053716958,0.0002862863,0.00023883257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99659014,0.00057905936,0.001212074,0.000068699585,0.00035626788,0.0011938239],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016618195,0.0002138631,0.00019471471,0.0006415971,0.0008925944,0.0017591462,0.0003351686,0.0006061918,0.003867572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005984986,0.0002259136,0.00028088957,0.00034815588,0.0006235217,0.0008527011,0.0010908867,0.0009378077,0.00056541903],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001915193,0.0018264333,0.94722646,0.00005619612,0.000019460922,0.00031971585,0.02448807,0.00007933854,0.0013413159,0.00011827654,0.0005295249,0.02380369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020472182,0.002779929,0.9478582,0.00005928592,0.000015278712,0.00055725605,0.044613276,0.00029581395,0.0008217231,0.00009729424,0.002854163,0.000027277647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031480407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053569376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003867572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071277877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011847103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012938321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001985349","doi":"10.1136/jme.2003.005199","title":"Institutional ethics review of clinical study agreements","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"De Veber; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Data science; Engineering ethics; Political science; Computer science; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.870295283781405,"score_gpt":0.7455111771351124,"score_spread":0.12478410664629258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001985349","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014848811,0.01528973,0.29254848,0.13231438,0.045991726,0.2591757,0.004496186,0.0029859836,0.232349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.120831184,0.016765015,0.42029402,0.053995598,0.015678609,0.27752957,0.0066979714,0.001825396,0.08638269],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.44995943,0.38269794,0.084731594,0.013744059,0.059428122,0.009438887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.26873964,0.25298247,0.03308606,0.13531575,0.28708196,0.022794101],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4430645,0.0018444896,0.0048098713,0.010769185,0.007737314,0.016563231,0.008563256,0.014611626,0.020518372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.586629,0.0029757384,0.002621456,0.013544586,0.011889041,0.008114996,0.007500611,0.017165443,0.014579035],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012943546,0.0004678117,0.0028742051,0.008070726,0.00025907974,0.0028172906,0.019692816,0.00089120865,0.002757135,0.19074267,0.5069528,0.2631799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005245326,0.0002567673,0.00155474,0.009277178,0.00007672966,0.00086400064,0.0035035436,0.0015458536,0.0015827969,0.030711973,0.9499623,0.00013960064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021161889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031179462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9853884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012147501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14835908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68680066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025929190","doi":"10.1136/jme.2002.002329","title":"Genes and equality: Figure 1","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Deontic logic; Psychological intervention; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Economics; Epistemology; Psychology; Law; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.20730047864699036,"score_gpt":0.434551461039691,"score_spread":0.22725098239270064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025929190","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029152944,0.006668061,0.009326936,0.107245095,0.0018861981,0.00005522305,0.00015906368,0.00012875695,0.8716155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35051465,0.013975392,0.018896848,0.07737835,0.0019440607,0.00038490418,0.0003472796,0.00022102134,0.5363375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843127,0.0006803499,0.00003163331,0.00028468814,0.00033468413,0.00023731888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993432,0.00022236783,0.00004528387,0.00007936092,0.00015050924,0.00015926824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016691962,0.00054158276,0.00040359423,0.00090360176,0.0041576377,0.008341547,0.0010845109,0.0057578627,0.047853664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024116095,0.00020521421,0.0005218103,0.0010168261,0.017036835,0.00785751,0.0038482226,0.0040086634,0.008128864],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004242218,0.000004002747,0.000105005965,0.000015217357,0.0000012592079,0.00003393744,0.0006823069,0.000040038594,0.000037562597,0.97794616,0.015963327,0.005166939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007196003,0.0000101463465,0.00030639165,0.00008033585,0.0000040360032,0.00013470862,0.0011016855,0.00009045185,0.00006465832,0.59845394,0.399738,0.000008414778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009480938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047853664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046564136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039853654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16008651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055445824","doi":"10.1136/jme.2005.012419","title":"The challenge of Terri Schiavo: lessons for bioethics","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Anesthesia and Sedative Agents","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Lactate dehydrogenase; Arginine; Nitric oxide; Enzyme; Chemistry; Internal medicine; Biochemistry; Endocrinology; Alanine; Electron paramagnetic resonance; CCL4; Molecular biology; Biology; Amino acid; Carbon tetrachloride; Medicine","score_opus":0.20559397945478874,"score_gpt":0.46919817568224453,"score_spread":0.2636041962274558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055445824","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016493865,0.008711601,0.0013892796,0.966392,0.0022915814,0.0000060877264,0.0000061684104,0.0000136035,0.01954038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34447336,0.01781538,0.0060938313,0.6014984,0.010542609,0.00012523898,0.000029282273,0.00011850967,0.019303411],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844355,0.007689134,0.00041404692,0.0014529398,0.004375706,0.0016327929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97471285,0.019006183,0.0007932811,0.0010931438,0.0021684018,0.0022261185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026342753,0.0006205731,0.0011462152,0.001409434,0.015014487,0.015390648,0.0036147335,0.024360146,0.0036833514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0543174,0.0004460912,0.0008998356,0.0009299465,0.07079688,0.020102749,0.010327563,0.0321128,0.00094783393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015273039,0.000011686126,0.0001284891,0.000047521164,0.0000049756627,0.00021521447,0.0045162593,0.00019268936,0.00005562398,0.9129492,0.07317297,0.008690195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015942995,0.000013104622,0.00012478566,0.00042789173,0.0000035380167,0.00024357841,0.0051842122,0.00026420565,0.00008211075,0.7738527,0.21975395,0.00003398066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032954536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031504568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032954536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011321662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025178092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13931543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065240875","doi":"10.1136/jme.2009.032607","title":"Evolution of hospital clinical ethics committees in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; Queen's University; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Memorial University of Newfoundland","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Ethics committee; Work (physics); Sample (material); Health care; Order (exchange); Public relations; Political science; Medicine; Medical education; Psychology; Family medicine; Public administration; Business; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.15090243509411455,"score_gpt":0.5649977494740074,"score_spread":0.41409531437989283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065240875","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8363912,0.015677141,0.0033120627,0.07257555,0.0008870964,0.0004984914,0.00063664664,0.00013894572,0.0698829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861558,0.0018096727,0.0013763667,0.0030433955,0.000057626487,0.000040880957,0.00015894759,0.000024933228,0.007332335],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9593004,0.010540405,0.0019954704,0.0023001062,0.01493496,0.010928672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84933186,0.016805153,0.015758153,0.0025148492,0.06691713,0.048672896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021744575,0.0002659071,0.0005155052,0.004280267,0.011342668,0.007998278,0.00270811,0.00202082,0.0023694423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054097135,0.0006950337,0.0004466601,0.006926013,0.007905201,0.002340688,0.0054297852,0.0030875923,0.00021139883],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049908005,0.00029973473,0.4439082,0.001094882,0.00018268939,0.002913273,0.12993856,0.0032192392,0.0028317028,0.10104983,0.055160847,0.25890186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004757187,0.00012910427,0.6937198,0.0007296844,0.0000334184,0.0005742235,0.07180208,0.0017405974,0.00051893893,0.0033944922,0.2271103,0.0001998857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94354045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9759051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8338874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1661126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21739124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96719116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070784613","doi":"10.1136/jme.2003.002931","title":"An antidote to the emerging two tier organ donation policy in Canada: the Public Cadaveric Organ Donation Program","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto General Hospital; University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Organ donation; Donation; Organ procurement; Procurement; Cadaveric spasm; Medicine; Political science; Public relations; Business; Law; Transplantation; Surgery; Marketing","score_opus":0.030314790048867453,"score_gpt":0.37789641429892035,"score_spread":0.3475816242500529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070784613","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08176606,0.0077117593,0.0061664134,0.8271811,0.0010212748,0.000086773674,0.00012387532,0.00014054151,0.075802244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78173035,0.005945593,0.007253929,0.14837575,0.0004876606,0.00007490852,0.00012594671,0.00005797238,0.055947848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99302095,0.0012914216,0.00011332771,0.00027565422,0.0026192283,0.0026794933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99227715,0.0018105361,0.00048503984,0.00021873908,0.002127851,0.0030807247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004040938,0.00030376704,0.00034492175,0.0006864046,0.013936366,0.007197436,0.0017319345,0.0069732266,0.0031000283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0088625215,0.00032427014,0.00051494286,0.0009600052,0.008565514,0.0028594611,0.0036791468,0.008432415,0.00018413222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013886877,0.0001595534,0.010147177,0.00032404112,0.000028464323,0.0013546294,0.008178262,0.0022802502,0.0013715029,0.7776547,0.1119474,0.08641523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026181832,0.00024447127,0.039377127,0.0009578724,0.00010966671,0.0009080646,0.021976387,0.0058558285,0.0018833209,0.09272569,0.83543986,0.00025993274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95997375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9826684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9270112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.072988816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.271294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52957344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072563064","doi":"10.1136/jme.29.1.44","title":"Knowledge of the legislation governing proxy consent to treatment and research","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Health and Social Services Centre University Institute of Geriatrics of Sherbrooke; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Alzheimer Society; Université de Sherbrooke","keywords":"Legislation; Respondent; Guardian; Informed consent; Proxy (statistics); Legal guardian; Research ethics; Psychology; Family medicine; Medicine; Medical education; Law; Political science; Alternative medicine; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.34248034330019067,"score_gpt":0.5739822247082923,"score_spread":0.23150188140810163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072563064","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9477918,0.0021029701,0.0033918796,0.021134034,0.000095200216,0.0005641032,0.0002761928,0.000019946943,0.024623722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99574935,0.00076263776,0.0010477379,0.0015715656,0.00004639663,0.00009284138,0.00009129633,0.000002605249,0.0006354833],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9789063,0.013430391,0.001711978,0.00048969744,0.004167411,0.0012942211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8293027,0.104261875,0.041918356,0.006649163,0.01306686,0.0048009627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03302266,0.000113721966,0.00024345651,0.0010481097,0.0014577848,0.0015681732,0.00094019243,0.0016924081,0.0045570396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13724482,0.00027009315,0.00025251877,0.0005807038,0.0051748357,0.0019277812,0.0012263609,0.0012774579,0.00041923524],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036414483,0.00045481807,0.8121213,0.0007016097,0.00006595802,0.00073747104,0.038963158,0.0005472867,0.0017224057,0.0053103054,0.004904967,0.13410659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069933,0.0006732498,0.9244029,0.0021248409,0.00005157544,0.0025379313,0.033051383,0.0010806285,0.00092599844,0.003515602,0.031482503,0.00008337205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.074571915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08657001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074571915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004862046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015198658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17464256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077806898","doi":"10.1136/jme.28.2.99","title":"Thomson, the right to life, and partial birth abortion or two MULES for Sister Sarah","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Sister; Right to life; Medicine; Obstetrics; Pregnancy; Law; Human rights; Biology; Political science; Genetics","score_opus":0.12961886363275307,"score_gpt":0.43027385795057105,"score_spread":0.30065499431781795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077806898","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03157508,0.07349594,0.0041593984,0.5695008,0.0046768445,0.000025864714,0.000069815025,0.000025735295,0.31647047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60433406,0.021772562,0.0030226887,0.21257344,0.0040533096,0.000061490835,0.00004523102,0.00005187983,0.15408537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867296,0.000602252,0.00006236579,0.00017670449,0.00030151094,0.0001842198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826473,0.0012406198,0.00013233813,0.000078123005,0.000115978204,0.00016821401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019267907,0.0001535075,0.000298978,0.0002289269,0.0029765097,0.002402277,0.000361588,0.005977723,0.0043354114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006886171,0.00013689138,0.00022549674,0.00021255593,0.0073462543,0.0028130757,0.0023022701,0.0047521205,0.0004380009],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003149467,0.000010249071,0.0003056852,0.00003932777,0.0000037088823,0.0004290378,0.0030141976,0.000037918588,0.00018548737,0.9297799,0.050698888,0.015464146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002005418,0.00005361784,0.00091416854,0.00031743007,0.000014427717,0.0018900959,0.0028864117,0.00014022972,0.00031217726,0.39056802,0.60286474,0.000018584267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029945865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050784824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005977723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015990897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018225627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01450336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084044584","doi":"10.1136/jme.2008.024752","title":"Propranolol, post-traumatic stress disorder and narrative identity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Empathy and Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Neuroethics; Narrative; Bioethics; Propranolol; Identity (music); Traumatic stress; Psychotherapist; Medicine; Quality of life (healthcare); Psychiatry; Psychology; Traumatic memories; Narrative therapy; Law; Political science; Neuroscience; Anesthesia; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.05838502864932424,"score_gpt":0.3994187541323381,"score_spread":0.3410337254830139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084044584","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7341709,0.01662282,0.0003756651,0.07180497,0.0005103947,0.00015043905,0.0004371803,0.00001808428,0.17590952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98464096,0.0057361852,0.0003499029,0.0009355166,0.000120472156,0.00007564861,0.00012017266,0.0000032065361,0.008018047],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994802,0.00028849952,0.000018552882,0.000026041358,0.00011195887,0.00007468567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958436,0.0017744424,0.001267539,0.000112891736,0.00024379663,0.00075775845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090273644,0.000158369,0.00011876327,0.0005654969,0.0014048838,0.0016571119,0.0005559214,0.0005776798,0.013117999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008337426,0.00006911294,0.00007034229,0.0004617022,0.0011941037,0.0011722384,0.00087089255,0.0010842346,0.00036366185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026164192,0.004949398,0.23485726,0.0015030829,0.00016400497,0.0069874926,0.054805182,0.00035839475,0.0010832103,0.1555271,0.0775957,0.45955276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029120356,0.00074615714,0.772191,0.0013846172,0.000111293506,0.0059621194,0.07261129,0.00083942193,0.0002596578,0.08070636,0.06483732,0.000059595208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0096516665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014767074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013117999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017055138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021375224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0438841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088724213","doi":"10.1136/jme.2006.016550","title":"Violating ethics: unlawful combatants, national security and health professionals","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Institute of Gender and Health; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Torture; Complicity; Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Refugee; Health care; Power (physics); Medicine; Amnesty; Criminology; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.44557519086646713,"score_gpt":0.6112288877725712,"score_spread":0.1656536969061041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088724213","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003961565,0.994447,0.00006629069,0.0038198775,0.00021811863,0.000005533723,0.0000023423038,0.0000011468225,0.0010434726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00650296,0.9906205,0.0001775303,0.0020993883,0.00023734936,0.000015077084,0.000007312868,0.000001477631,0.000338454],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98941493,0.0064471997,0.00079080777,0.00035776812,0.0025698033,0.00041945706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97425723,0.020310162,0.0025753865,0.00026155348,0.0018737712,0.000721877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0098800985,0.00079472846,0.0021738291,0.0032034563,0.0017433148,0.0039378097,0.0012161921,0.0063122227,0.0030223385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02584196,0.00049011374,0.00072769285,0.004541261,0.0041193613,0.0038882203,0.0032169244,0.0044124313,0.00052202126],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067176414,0.00007883818,0.0019414048,0.022792274,0.00022983263,0.00052282703,0.0028110393,0.0000911461,0.000111254216,0.01291503,0.042882532,0.9155566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010276806,0.0001218833,0.012416007,0.12176249,0.0005189249,0.0052225254,0.013556301,0.000084934225,0.00021107844,0.02251419,0.8234213,0.000067588364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061829933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026231905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0098800985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026369458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0113552995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052251577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095775042","doi":"10.1136/jme.2006.020115","title":"International migration of doctors from developing countries: need to follow the Commonwealth Code","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Global Health Workforce Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Developing country; Economic shortage; Developed country; Political science; Code (set theory); Economic growth; Medicine; Public relations; Law; Computer science; Economics; Environmental health; Government (linguistics); Population","score_opus":0.1608342796798747,"score_gpt":0.5040718796968885,"score_spread":0.34323760001701376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095775042","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041584976,0.003653348,0.001642921,0.9102879,0.0031158736,0.000067522706,0.00001559658,0.000025963394,0.03960592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51227546,0.009380795,0.004297453,0.44683918,0.0025643283,0.00018478584,0.00004944847,0.00007484554,0.024333723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98825604,0.005658771,0.00087548146,0.0003843462,0.001548662,0.0032768075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96525764,0.01414665,0.0045363232,0.0015487556,0.0044503137,0.010060344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018562628,0.00023145636,0.00041727422,0.000689038,0.0071824975,0.0061826357,0.0010552141,0.006875708,0.0033509522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04807463,0.00025592078,0.00037022404,0.0009424049,0.010714183,0.0056615775,0.006864161,0.011254213,0.0006333726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012842956,0.00030114263,0.04779231,0.0005734733,0.000035925375,0.002295215,0.13043089,0.0006539952,0.0014144529,0.34080097,0.24413013,0.23144309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000773039,0.00020016164,0.029809972,0.0031296683,0.000021267417,0.0021144832,0.13449854,0.00040301794,0.00054152036,0.05400245,0.7750907,0.000110854344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02212505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030238923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02212505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031976264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030591827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098169744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096345448","doi":"10.1136/jme.2006.016204","title":"Wickedness or folly? The ethics of NICE’s decisions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Healthcare cost, quality, practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Institute for Work & Health","funders":"","keywords":"Wickedness; Rebuttal; Nice; Excellence; Morality; Sociology; Medical ethics; Concreteness; Law; Environmental ethics; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.9213234238112872,"score_gpt":0.7270694886599182,"score_spread":0.19425393515136902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096345448","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00051247544,0.5307419,0.0020773315,0.44272903,0.0074277404,0.000019703384,0.000011276976,0.00001910869,0.016461484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06523706,0.59797937,0.006585367,0.30924204,0.015442398,0.00018275196,0.000029724497,0.000065196466,0.005236089],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9221195,0.05145277,0.00441426,0.0013715639,0.01921998,0.0014219349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9210614,0.06489954,0.0044964603,0.002169665,0.005894645,0.0014782508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045348566,0.0005906502,0.0026074392,0.002604031,0.002682863,0.009581334,0.0020286737,0.012424749,0.0016228883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11779112,0.00071414304,0.0010821435,0.003993198,0.023467405,0.013168467,0.003299067,0.017064119,0.00083397224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006715999,0.000039487648,0.0002501681,0.004655789,0.00016113839,0.00049053854,0.005316949,0.0003183597,0.00010613781,0.5150859,0.24524678,0.22826166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000462517,0.00004285112,0.0003910014,0.01051535,0.00004526105,0.00075624173,0.0024279058,0.000115019786,0.00008021769,0.19860557,0.7869151,0.000059188027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006645477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012121008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045348566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005975799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01668666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.239829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096475618","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2012-100695","title":"Deliberate use of placebos in clinical practice: what we really know","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pain Management and Placebo Effect","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital; Jewish General Hospital; McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Popularity; Alternative medicine; Pill; Medicine; Interpretation (philosophy); Clinical Practice; Value (mathematics); Placebo; Clinical trial; Psychiatry; Family medicine; Psychology; Psychotherapist; Social psychology; Pharmacology; Pathology; Computer science","score_opus":0.22449442378451723,"score_gpt":0.4719536467805867,"score_spread":0.24745922299606948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096475618","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013001807,0.54734755,0.002311795,0.44204712,0.0049580564,0.000052390784,0.000039636652,0.00002684294,0.0019164358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05772101,0.6650306,0.0076536764,0.22212447,0.046186924,0.00047662552,0.000061817045,0.00006188771,0.00068300345],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8610347,0.110427596,0.010136245,0.0042638853,0.012365432,0.0017721532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.25885433,0.66395897,0.031295896,0.017782545,0.022692725,0.005415463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15955578,0.0012486404,0.0059758676,0.0030462444,0.0041937083,0.014196142,0.004503781,0.029367106,0.006921757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.40114102,0.0016177994,0.002066125,0.0036583515,0.04945217,0.04639161,0.006276097,0.026708089,0.0031572522],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011876376,0.00059881277,0.0059528966,0.04661528,0.0006858469,0.0013075807,0.01682751,0.0003883857,0.0004838233,0.08408038,0.10904295,0.7328288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005948112,0.0011934877,0.0069577526,0.18558693,0.00063850486,0.0049007717,0.022520084,0.0009671396,0.00090399524,0.3990009,0.37626535,0.0004701632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029953383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042574666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15955578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055834507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013387375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8438217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097055790","doi":"10.1136/jme.27.suppl_1.i41","title":"Teaching old dogs new tricks—a personal perspective on a decade of efforts by a clinical ethics committee to promote awareness of medical ethics","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medical ethics; Medical education; Perspective (graphical); Health care; Formative assessment; Military medical ethics; Health professionals; Nursing ethics; Engineering ethics; Institution; Medicine; Psychology; Political science; Law; Pedagogy; Engineering","score_opus":0.24471901472290208,"score_gpt":0.6018820741024096,"score_spread":0.3571630593795075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097055790","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011340007,0.034630608,0.00524721,0.91296804,0.0079315035,0.000030737636,0.000007536483,0.00007810994,0.02776622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3802276,0.053791136,0.007597657,0.4879273,0.009249625,0.00009991575,0.000027612485,0.0004070776,0.060672063],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9172363,0.06519773,0.001400203,0.0021413341,0.00939908,0.0046252217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9104608,0.03920708,0.004089083,0.0028100663,0.01586476,0.027568217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037236273,0.0005742621,0.00057044206,0.0014822644,0.02433543,0.023751883,0.0023925765,0.015846416,0.0021236592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06618999,0.0008686019,0.0005688301,0.0020408866,0.048319787,0.013621547,0.010119946,0.033381954,0.0011882528],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046396806,0.00019677005,0.0028403434,0.00039366283,0.00005149199,0.0030497902,0.36222902,0.00039553051,0.0008079775,0.08903688,0.43842956,0.10252256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010596164,0.00007571268,0.0009014362,0.0008663561,0.000007832967,0.0027855518,0.13587268,0.00017368166,0.00020894896,0.011258329,0.84775925,0.00007964051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016956005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048835505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037236273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011379881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023341049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1969266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098333298","doi":"10.1136/jme.28.2.68","title":"Are doctors altruistic?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficence; Gratitude; Fiduciary; Obligation; Altruism (biology); Duty; Psychology; Best interests; Social psychology; Law; Medicine; Political science; Autonomy","score_opus":0.10927620748165554,"score_gpt":0.3837161964824324,"score_spread":0.2744399890007768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098333298","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028673712,0.021599505,0.0022372522,0.85944176,0.0029734017,0.000019243162,0.00005148858,0.000032849865,0.084970795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72764564,0.013797522,0.0013048851,0.23301451,0.0028231766,0.000050362458,0.00004079962,0.00003240701,0.021290705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.986368,0.00974091,0.00030505192,0.00064922153,0.0016734186,0.0012634638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9720639,0.0134543115,0.00409356,0.0012261189,0.002115267,0.0070468998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010896524,0.00020438372,0.0004276343,0.0006890613,0.005522022,0.004813691,0.000570612,0.0055359257,0.0076831235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04207878,0.00032299367,0.00036998076,0.0005230458,0.013205611,0.003236003,0.002982734,0.0050250343,0.0018848788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003411317,0.000096970056,0.019378416,0.00047471377,0.0001265464,0.0018682532,0.03802445,0.00023266267,0.0005374712,0.5379818,0.30563605,0.0953015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014084343,0.00012259398,0.009880651,0.00080654706,0.00006364527,0.004624379,0.017480157,0.00025413884,0.0002882444,0.25551835,0.71073866,0.00008185857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028580069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004761091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010896524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038939368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052854912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057626963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098647282","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2011-100153","title":"A survey of the perspectives of patients who are seriously ill regarding end-of-life decisions in some medical institutions of Korea, China and Japan","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ewha Womans University","keywords":"China; Socioeconomic status; Spouse; End-of-life care; Quarter (Canadian coin); Medicine; Family medicine; Psychology; Palliative care; Nursing; Political science; Environmental health; Geography; Law; Population","score_opus":0.1785516584684406,"score_gpt":0.4470032929594813,"score_spread":0.2684516344910407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098647282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99945086,0.00008934248,0.000012184083,0.000188488,0.0000028939817,0.000009152859,0.000031925174,5.4000753e-7,0.0002147071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99936336,0.0001834912,0.000038948343,0.00023554446,0.000005606007,0.000014681165,0.00004201323,6.095988e-7,0.00011564602],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987004,0.00061521475,0.0001380062,0.00008223071,0.00014430934,0.0003198246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939586,0.0010401149,0.0023909893,0.00009651302,0.0005242763,0.00198951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017187339,0.0003184425,0.00046522636,0.0008651946,0.0014796216,0.0011774258,0.00039494684,0.00064187136,0.0014909783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005370314,0.0002900773,0.0003933166,0.00095975836,0.0011082994,0.00094827247,0.0012993959,0.00075878354,0.00013692441],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019537208,0.00013170873,0.9012269,0.0001209799,0.00005158354,0.0009044508,0.089448504,0.00003502531,0.0007537604,0.0000891157,0.0007593705,0.00628317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029105573,0.0005043697,0.6873347,0.00009867976,0.000030317153,0.000698781,0.30887142,0.00016374455,0.00015352582,0.000039442908,0.0020382022,0.00003777012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013378354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01853989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013378354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014786941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018671206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026600957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098682384","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2012-101260","title":"Depictions of ‘brain death’ in the media: medical and ethical implications","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal; Montreal Clinical Research Institute","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Newspaper; Organ donation; Confusion; Meaning (existential); Psychology; Medicine; Law; Transplantation; Political science; Psychoanalysis; Surgery","score_opus":0.0594112280284292,"score_gpt":0.3977646414534941,"score_spread":0.3383534134250649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098682384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6529375,0.06874009,0.004586953,0.096331984,0.002610645,0.00027328878,0.005666232,0.00013546877,0.1687179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9603975,0.025351746,0.0018617281,0.006417577,0.0020859477,0.00011982467,0.00066458486,0.0000560932,0.0030450278],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887927,0.005699101,0.0009328666,0.0005114662,0.0033971095,0.0006668022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85922337,0.110642895,0.018178932,0.0015330996,0.009171216,0.0012504593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010269193,0.0007474035,0.00040427851,0.015278667,0.0061226767,0.009348663,0.000930845,0.0017563283,0.004257327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051513534,0.0003782362,0.00031589463,0.015104409,0.008168899,0.0059763687,0.0032184694,0.0017878346,0.0004496267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042740267,0.000044890945,0.05006601,0.008083408,0.000149245,0.005476841,0.7585546,0.0002572098,0.0032733916,0.028550396,0.042548656,0.10256806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022999124,0.000050557293,0.070049986,0.011983756,0.00030491984,0.004453941,0.5489294,0.00042094552,0.0024922139,0.006375293,0.35476813,0.00014780961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061342534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08909008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061342534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008175733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045503583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12197095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099164461","doi":"10.1136/jme.2009.029371","title":"Transparency, accountability and vaccination policy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Appeal; Freedom of information; Confidentiality; Accountability; Duty; Political science; Presumption; Legislation; Medicine; Democracy; Law; Rubella; Vaccination; Law and economics; Measles; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03974200818870436,"score_gpt":0.4295755049153333,"score_spread":0.3898334967266289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099164461","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011953847,0.02204591,0.01937809,0.6320611,0.0035681524,0.00014341048,0.00016629037,0.00014625615,0.3105369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8774611,0.011520672,0.0065355594,0.07041123,0.0049901707,0.0003258506,0.00011169433,0.00014825063,0.028495518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.91909695,0.055323828,0.0025916602,0.005033733,0.01068182,0.007272072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8729472,0.0935728,0.012138153,0.007647262,0.0081728,0.0055217566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05463304,0.0005551729,0.0007068171,0.0020454924,0.0069484888,0.01574002,0.0016415846,0.013727496,0.0111096585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.117237404,0.00051301304,0.00056948053,0.0022901022,0.034510955,0.015184884,0.009728687,0.010818316,0.0011338358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001772098,0.000015066588,0.00065959047,0.00010330037,0.000010015275,0.00004259068,0.0015956078,0.000419293,0.000042205473,0.9711284,0.0136920605,0.01227408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020298903,0.000024365838,0.0008339214,0.00053749233,0.000008122361,0.000064017586,0.00062257505,0.0005353042,0.00013923379,0.90505147,0.09214005,0.000023205412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011890201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006550321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05463304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015862234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024052097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28893054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102710982","doi":"10.1136/jme.29.6.337","title":"Absent virtues: the poacher becomes gamekeeper","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Pembroke College, University of Cambridge; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Paternalism; Bioethics; Elitism; Accountability; Medical ethics; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Field (mathematics); Political science; Environmental ethics; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.19924716142092325,"score_gpt":0.5620562782201366,"score_spread":0.36280911679921335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102710982","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02409429,0.0061394097,0.05622218,0.12538268,0.002916232,0.00009486206,0.00003606121,0.00030726794,0.7848069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7828148,0.0031163914,0.011739556,0.022986216,0.00086069596,0.0001907958,0.000034343884,0.0003788599,0.17787834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923698,0.0048407842,0.00016635109,0.00084344007,0.0010036954,0.0007759508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99303716,0.0028884613,0.0005489288,0.0008971119,0.0011274857,0.0015008568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009395199,0.0006203419,0.00066883944,0.0011267569,0.009372212,0.016453322,0.0012114091,0.005494343,0.009056642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0154054025,0.00044695186,0.00045053047,0.00066359073,0.05139245,0.018275945,0.010473261,0.009219543,0.0035910287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016544749,0.000013616078,0.00022494841,0.000034705037,0.0000037028487,0.00011564684,0.007518075,0.00009813285,0.00010984218,0.97268033,0.011736949,0.0074476623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001264854,0.000033402925,0.0001414205,0.00015216417,0.000005538463,0.00019069324,0.0059678745,0.0004759202,0.00019936681,0.73942596,0.25337487,0.000020164925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023378169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033022608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016453322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003200762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061817537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049687147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102981370","doi":"10.1136/jme.2010.040097","title":"Assessment of children's capacity to consent for research: a descriptive qualitative study of researchers' practices: Table 1","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital; Hospital for Sick Children; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Qualitative research; Psychology; Legislation; Focus group; Research ethics; Medical education; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Medicine; Law; Sociology; Alternative medicine; Social science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.9642022526376816,"score_gpt":0.7600601891132074,"score_spread":0.20414206352447417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102981370","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96603584,0.0042028017,0.0070276135,0.007083526,0.00011362508,0.0017708467,0.0008017142,0.00008193323,0.012882066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840252,0.0032451202,0.0057562403,0.000996457,0.000025182018,0.0019200791,0.00021366576,0.00006746606,0.0037506053],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9514415,0.036066145,0.0029442378,0.0024933708,0.0037361956,0.0033184662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89535886,0.085177384,0.006414561,0.0024790575,0.0071343244,0.0034358813],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.050183516,0.00063161325,0.0014852182,0.003273667,0.014016761,0.00705031,0.002965763,0.002508356,0.0033120434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07382568,0.0015771217,0.0006406085,0.005474792,0.019286754,0.005122422,0.006785766,0.00405428,0.0005091621],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000088744855,0.0000055091004,0.0011586229,0.00014838902,0.0000014465468,0.0002649049,0.9960955,0.000015753258,0.0002737843,0.0005955077,0.00016711232,0.0012644862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028217241,0.00002027919,0.0012371861,0.00031441948,0.0000033964284,0.00021836978,0.98682076,0.000026474514,0.00019487203,0.00021806468,0.010927151,0.000016200533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06721416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09191976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94981647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024447845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02558885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26539898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103054986","doi":"10.1136/jme.2010.038877","title":"The right to die in the minimally conscious state","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Traumatic Brain Injury Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Minimally conscious state; Right to die; Value of life; Consciousness; Terminally ill; State (computer science); Quality of life (healthcare); Value (mathematics); Psychology; Resuscitation Orders; Medicine; Law; Psychotherapist; Psychiatry; Palliative care; Political science; Computer science; Nursing; Surgery; Neuroscience; Economics","score_opus":0.08295027210208605,"score_gpt":0.44070309980054095,"score_spread":0.3577528276984549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103054986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10572058,0.020467807,0.024921002,0.37216568,0.0022784544,0.00006203761,0.00010041428,0.00003920522,0.47424486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9509631,0.004172309,0.003257912,0.03226216,0.0008874704,0.00005624101,0.00003811508,0.00001154678,0.0083511025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99395084,0.0041200407,0.00024367205,0.0002831383,0.0009069667,0.00049535546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942327,0.0033918414,0.00063892873,0.00061898597,0.00043271304,0.0006848095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006991635,0.00013536632,0.00040959226,0.00027370758,0.0022399207,0.0033418683,0.0005524179,0.00379265,0.002703326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015711073,0.000115631636,0.00028697253,0.00022838688,0.016154062,0.0028429113,0.0039604283,0.0045729307,0.0005160661],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034460187,0.00001396232,0.00073832815,0.000040318555,0.000004327371,0.00022330126,0.0030299872,0.00008038223,0.00034456307,0.97552186,0.0053456244,0.014622943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003061177,0.0001105384,0.002171799,0.00058086554,0.000014242422,0.0020030278,0.00270218,0.00016425438,0.00042999448,0.8335837,0.15817736,0.000031479867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065837515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009866388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006991635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007897553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036875075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03697574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103405093","doi":"10.1136/jme.2003.007641","title":"Clinical bioethics integration, sustainability, and accountability: the Hub and Spokes Strategy: Figure 1","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Choroid plexus; Tropism; Biology; Cerebrospinal fluid; Viral entry; Cell biology; Medicine; Immunology; Pathology; Neuroscience; Virus; Central nervous system; Viral replication","score_opus":0.163091092921658,"score_gpt":0.519067002950142,"score_spread":0.35597591002848394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103405093","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10416059,0.0004352566,0.16212815,0.14667456,0.0013713844,0.0028334425,0.0001179425,0.0020979908,0.58018064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5793079,0.00030805118,0.11528721,0.018469583,0.0002296389,0.0011833279,0.00013182162,0.0004185714,0.28466386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935416,0.0028107308,0.0001329617,0.00056945183,0.0017150696,0.0012300236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99291766,0.0011976333,0.00034249068,0.0005616611,0.0018527962,0.0031277551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008723202,0.00066417444,0.00032584157,0.0017104832,0.008193573,0.011323316,0.0012021351,0.0068445816,0.018523803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010552221,0.0005795283,0.00038225818,0.00075085653,0.0057881083,0.006512884,0.005941399,0.0031895058,0.006092885],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011367047,0.0003354667,0.00590017,0.0001700948,0.000043340286,0.0014166486,0.007982343,0.0021111183,0.002589364,0.5025175,0.27935916,0.19746113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014890348,0.0004379761,0.005990364,0.00036875095,0.00003898746,0.001926729,0.024434857,0.01064621,0.0026412392,0.21431926,0.73886985,0.00017688156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071817045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01969301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018523803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005411754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027328746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061968327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104253362","doi":"10.1136/jme.2003.005835","title":"How physicians face ethical difficulties: a qualitative analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":145,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ethical dilemma; Grounded theory; Dilemma; Psychology; Reputation; Qualitative research; Medical ethics; Ethical code; Ethical decision; Medical education; Medicine; Social psychology; Public relations; Sociology; Psychiatry; Political science","score_opus":0.18231891315246754,"score_gpt":0.5998661711290435,"score_spread":0.417547257976576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104253362","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97013164,0.0010724289,0.009762025,0.0069653336,0.00011556799,0.0010815391,0.0008245232,0.000042766234,0.010004243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857167,0.0015461977,0.00586204,0.0019002602,0.000035177487,0.0013154537,0.00028346822,0.00005244385,0.0032883347],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97688234,0.018055242,0.0006856075,0.0008957337,0.0017234512,0.0017577466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9427579,0.04791814,0.0026767342,0.0007340724,0.0041812407,0.0017320589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022717567,0.0006890056,0.0008403651,0.003338844,0.008638627,0.0055087074,0.0019953866,0.0025571357,0.0028164352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047253985,0.0008512561,0.000486391,0.0040856884,0.01019989,0.0046920436,0.005860872,0.003070149,0.00037764618],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022271346,0.000017740744,0.0013952733,0.00018501289,0.0000035488185,0.00038964537,0.9937219,0.000034323246,0.00043622943,0.0010390726,0.00048172977,0.002273268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004220117,0.000013993931,0.00083926646,0.00020545271,0.0000028346415,0.00011689876,0.99370736,0.00008030052,0.0001685403,0.0004311643,0.0044227433,0.000007343958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010288005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012688327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022717567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009210175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008424306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12014341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105125967","doi":"10.1136/jme.2005.015057","title":"Factors influencing the effectiveness of research ethics committees","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Research ethics; Ethics committee; Institutional review board; Mandate; Human research; Institution; Workload; Corporate governance; Institutional research; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Public administration; Law; Management","score_opus":0.7297258863336424,"score_gpt":0.6914625287378725,"score_spread":0.03826335759576993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105125967","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93210316,0.0027437198,0.016024465,0.017043578,0.00035476685,0.0017617962,0.00012939611,0.00010081474,0.029738223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913953,0.0004745445,0.0054156785,0.0008618505,0.00017258097,0.00045180996,0.000057123445,0.000035339675,0.0011357049],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.5424507,0.35845056,0.035312638,0.0063758837,0.04320801,0.014202168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.20092095,0.5827672,0.0927234,0.022826876,0.06397737,0.03678424],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2272994,0.00043007082,0.0006734809,0.004190088,0.0066377167,0.0072126556,0.0019807722,0.0023178281,0.0031001018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.53591913,0.0008661943,0.0007206461,0.0024312807,0.0058694687,0.0036175668,0.004890599,0.0029329194,0.00071866816],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074325333,0.0007516958,0.78411776,0.00096733577,0.00047041042,0.0010830997,0.066980705,0.0014622607,0.0024890006,0.010552035,0.006132209,0.12425026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020379714,0.0009958933,0.86231625,0.001503551,0.00019831066,0.0015963663,0.082162455,0.003501166,0.002052617,0.009383023,0.03584421,0.00024233683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006445362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010109065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99768215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007791012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014113462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9528774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106262720","doi":"10.1136/jme.2007.022129","title":"The stem cell debate continues: the buying and selling of eggs for research","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Commodification; Payment; Stem cell; Voluntariness; Coercion (linguistics); Research ethics; Bandwagon effect; Business; Law; Economics; Political science; Biotechnology; Biology; Finance; Market economy","score_opus":0.2759263732598337,"score_gpt":0.5351369057904886,"score_spread":0.25921053253065485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106262720","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055985255,0.017399264,0.0020768368,0.94643366,0.0030204772,0.000007934032,0.000022664159,0.000012328754,0.025428241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16740339,0.037619635,0.004899647,0.74882114,0.01222056,0.0000750665,0.00004601304,0.0001249902,0.02878959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97050935,0.015266294,0.0012479287,0.001889286,0.009749536,0.0013377599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9319812,0.05635344,0.0024068507,0.001974889,0.0050069997,0.00227666],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03468236,0.00040034114,0.0009159859,0.0009469056,0.0068429834,0.014400712,0.0017503402,0.024131864,0.005873204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057348184,0.00037300895,0.00085436186,0.0013856059,0.037298873,0.018061567,0.005152579,0.018928098,0.0013689662],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006628024,0.000019333882,0.00060013874,0.0001788947,0.000015593305,0.00028991903,0.006342753,0.00006935122,0.00047820178,0.88772494,0.07287096,0.031343643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003294066,0.00006458516,0.0010032405,0.001281058,0.000025806105,0.00053672964,0.008436936,0.00017015568,0.00084487395,0.31964114,0.667921,0.00004153817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024647333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032854634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.993157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004259228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00629642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18342006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106308928","doi":"10.1136/jme.2010.037937","title":"How is informed consent related to emotions and empathy? An exploratory neuroethical investigation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Empathy; Informed consent; Psychology; Exploratory research; Social psychology; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.5544026964243888,"score_gpt":0.4955115486018369,"score_spread":0.05889114782255189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106308928","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.995773,0.0006251766,0.0008692366,0.0008976993,0.000004996711,0.0002100205,0.000021294763,0.0000020582972,0.0015965225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981078,0.00035962882,0.0010234985,0.00015511627,0.000009587604,0.00019322027,0.00001082997,9.570872e-7,0.00013933629],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.988167,0.010015701,0.00036827664,0.00039146992,0.00061408745,0.0004435457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9739449,0.018863475,0.004758484,0.0009749874,0.00076312677,0.0006949452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012497229,0.00026889323,0.00041588946,0.0011690146,0.0015715521,0.0022872493,0.00052699243,0.0012902545,0.0011069414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03500512,0.00023700061,0.000362323,0.0012151598,0.0055719037,0.0017049301,0.0023637896,0.0012132659,0.00010582633],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015203704,0.0023433012,0.5132416,0.0008522554,0.00018456238,0.018122265,0.33148196,0.00065825036,0.006879336,0.016353406,0.0008907402,0.10747194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014679304,0.005703818,0.56710416,0.0008687174,0.00018386354,0.033462316,0.34923905,0.0028231824,0.003928309,0.027923167,0.008448916,0.00016772383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052736735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082415575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012497229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016235977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020364434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06609249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106606850","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2011-100273","title":"Individual genetic and genomic research results and the tradition of informed consent: exploring US review board guidance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Center for Research Resources; National Human Genome Research Institute","keywords":"Informed consent; Readability; Institutional review board; Psychology; Public relations; Medical education; Political science; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Computer science; Pathology","score_opus":0.82099564858497,"score_gpt":0.6237045488606142,"score_spread":0.19729109972435577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106606850","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038111407,0.03405295,0.12812231,0.7316098,0.004758671,0.008153457,0.00055782753,0.00061297894,0.054020658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5245153,0.018069088,0.16037329,0.26273072,0.002628489,0.0220212,0.0006053867,0.00088444183,0.008172121],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.10511119,0.7541812,0.07279115,0.014180735,0.04606826,0.0076676016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.043060135,0.8192189,0.03942376,0.03835217,0.052564107,0.0073809363],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.788496,0.0012700846,0.0024428302,0.008545018,0.01765077,0.021142332,0.0098247705,0.028516568,0.0056086374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8425984,0.0042128204,0.0020291053,0.012583414,0.045719415,0.025970917,0.018931419,0.029998539,0.0023082208],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004545833,0.0002423909,0.009263608,0.006231531,0.00019336276,0.0030539937,0.3179252,0.0009491105,0.0020704814,0.3421923,0.13931918,0.17810422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004266644,0.0005912395,0.009063978,0.038339596,0.00023281226,0.0034501054,0.09414014,0.0035360774,0.002655646,0.16996121,0.6769987,0.00060386275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023401754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022783615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9714834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031107305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.166838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26082212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107313170","doi":"10.1136/jme.2004.009886","title":"Whose information is it anyway? Informing a 12-year-old patient of her terminal prognosis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Innovations in Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Vignette; Paternalism; Curriculum; Autonomy; Psychology; Health care; Medical education; Medicine; Social psychology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.040622495388088,"score_gpt":0.3819591538322397,"score_spread":0.34133665844415173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107313170","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99719363,0.00009931296,0.00015965346,0.0018987011,0.000019705238,0.000017890632,0.000009982281,0.0000057653792,0.0005953841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972671,0.00043521417,0.00050428516,0.00080138416,0.000015488891,0.000013026196,0.000018342816,0.000001965274,0.000943171],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905425,0.0004389144,0.00005392222,0.000049052232,0.00015219147,0.0002516484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942373,0.001593409,0.0019187748,0.00009990159,0.00036248777,0.0017881639],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021087022,0.0001866921,0.0001990732,0.00028333798,0.0015934788,0.0011581706,0.0004934742,0.0014361708,0.002336377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012226557,0.00022809266,0.00022325454,0.0001971012,0.0013738372,0.0011214141,0.0011051043,0.0019065575,0.00051288353],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035803806,0.0021205954,0.7392316,0.00031412856,0.000033956017,0.010088878,0.16948333,0.0004309617,0.0054080104,0.0005324875,0.0052047507,0.0667932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094043244,0.008299916,0.3864437,0.0004600479,0.00010304406,0.0317687,0.5328094,0.0016448206,0.0054651606,0.00096454594,0.031794637,0.0001520968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035002755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006045779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035002755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008794227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017269695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011152029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110451117","doi":"10.1136/jme.2004.011247","title":"Parental preferences for neonatal resuscitation research consent: a pilot study","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Neonatal Respiratory Health Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Parental consent; Family medicine; Likert scale; Medicine; Resuscitation; Population; Neonatal resuscitation; Medical emergency; Psychology; Alternative medicine; Emergency medicine","score_opus":0.5262297071198562,"score_gpt":0.5859322276780463,"score_spread":0.05970252055819014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110451117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987821,0.000031701366,0.00034170703,0.00007472395,0.0000074260515,0.00032603953,0.000043284577,0.000003175421,0.0003899011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997815,0.000099286655,0.0011486652,0.0001163202,0.000010145332,0.00057859975,0.000051507515,0.0000018975202,0.00017859721],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98761266,0.0098159835,0.00070695905,0.00036271996,0.0009769582,0.0005247289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9559387,0.03221395,0.0047974046,0.0022171754,0.003165196,0.0016676546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024064323,0.00039372098,0.00035000473,0.0005533817,0.0009970113,0.0009145653,0.00044519827,0.0006594556,0.003082093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04536491,0.00044991594,0.00052090193,0.0004845783,0.0009899612,0.00097105553,0.00092811376,0.0011189,0.00043157185],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0049868138,0.016941097,0.79250973,0.00059643545,0.00012908765,0.004015715,0.09072881,0.00035178653,0.0033935776,0.0007295981,0.0020211546,0.08359609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018530774,0.10492524,0.71831447,0.0004349459,0.00029336344,0.007155119,0.14704143,0.0023348958,0.0076276334,0.00076310197,0.009047044,0.00020969161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012665928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016201069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024064323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083933194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012212965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12726581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111106415","doi":"10.1136/jme.2011.043349","title":"Post-trial period surveillance for randomised controlled cardiovascular studies: submitted protocols, consent forms and the role of the ethics board","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network; Health Sciences Centre; University of Toronto; Mount Sinai Hospital; Sunnybrook Health Science Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Period (music); Research ethics; Ethics committee; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Family medicine; Psychology; Political science; Pathology; Psychiatry; Public administration","score_opus":0.3893595027802974,"score_gpt":0.533335551845002,"score_spread":0.14397604906470463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111106415","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07685121,0.042025004,0.21687876,0.12113657,0.015467019,0.4834879,0.0051373965,0.0009970577,0.038019095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20164753,0.0073335874,0.22029105,0.019677619,0.0046697315,0.5401926,0.0023439575,0.00039200985,0.0034518882],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.04050757,0.8589273,0.0802595,0.0042114677,0.014414549,0.0016795876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.044896036,0.58193636,0.15356743,0.1359856,0.076232344,0.0073822755],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8716002,0.0022567732,0.005186629,0.007588132,0.0067489073,0.016219389,0.00763493,0.01120369,0.0060959905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.87416416,0.004161975,0.0033300316,0.013647468,0.01656171,0.019944781,0.0072130826,0.013940234,0.0045095207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.027575595,0.0022808593,0.04280391,0.062401183,0.0019779112,0.0018328145,0.06806058,0.0022527154,0.004843236,0.11064936,0.13082835,0.5444935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.027401911,0.0139785,0.14696775,0.13171458,0.002092072,0.0033699817,0.023286017,0.013188781,0.011697032,0.13290809,0.49178922,0.001606047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016706763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022112033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9887963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012243483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08789391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15833986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111184769","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2011-100040","title":"Proceduralisation, choice and parental reflections on decisions to accept newborn bloodspot screening","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Population; Psychological intervention; Presentation (obstetrics); Variety (cybernetics); Work (physics); Medicine; Psychology; Public relations; Nursing; Environmental health; Political science; Computer science; Obstetrics; Engineering","score_opus":0.7857851979027124,"score_gpt":0.6465429448723693,"score_spread":0.1392422530303431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111184769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8830726,0.0026216388,0.010333156,0.070169896,0.00047976046,0.00011052077,0.000040537838,0.00004125837,0.033130664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937947,0.0006617451,0.0014234763,0.0026404853,0.00007391398,0.000035602574,0.000008743011,0.00001586637,0.0013454279],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.93243253,0.05931528,0.0016170919,0.0010326515,0.0038347756,0.0017677211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86095375,0.12314405,0.00882767,0.0025579603,0.0027118376,0.0018048168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038640246,0.00032418172,0.00030511292,0.0005758524,0.0046808845,0.007589058,0.0011188702,0.0043484867,0.001869357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14149942,0.00054660277,0.0005344386,0.00043290108,0.017019698,0.0051675644,0.00478051,0.0075243744,0.00028407804],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001884999,0.000085129264,0.007855608,0.00010523817,0.000023920615,0.0027013868,0.92071456,0.00018410642,0.0010238641,0.04692607,0.0014023421,0.018789297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008157594,0.0003870929,0.013767799,0.0007998347,0.00006935817,0.004581524,0.8604199,0.0012882251,0.0039484547,0.054266647,0.060229704,0.0001598682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030712117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028665205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038640246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004268301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003710243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2043516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112645860","doi":"10.1136/jme.2010.039735","title":"What sort of bioethical values are the evidence-based medicine and the GRADE approaches willing to deal with?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Beneficence; Autonomy; Grading (engineering); Economic Justice; Psychology; Evidence-based medicine; Engineering ethics; MEDLINE; Medical education; Medicine; Law; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.4564160358627489,"score_gpt":0.5465373072681498,"score_spread":0.09012127140540083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112645860","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019318319,0.039903376,0.01591217,0.9039398,0.012691102,0.000056970428,0.00009338112,0.000054208944,0.025417207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22267202,0.10107548,0.07131243,0.55770004,0.02989282,0.0011741668,0.00036164242,0.0006691471,0.015142295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.80781966,0.13125387,0.016952895,0.0075098197,0.032587,0.0038767555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6264464,0.25812736,0.027338276,0.018018339,0.057696164,0.012373439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1381822,0.0008994725,0.0026774372,0.008220805,0.005786657,0.037920684,0.0061310274,0.020629296,0.005058119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4486895,0.0013336766,0.0014966996,0.007595536,0.05360893,0.05849401,0.00855751,0.025949089,0.00446915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010310503,0.000062550505,0.0025007997,0.0024379606,0.000115133254,0.00017429524,0.020583322,0.00018827504,0.0002564464,0.68511635,0.11045364,0.17800806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006779198,0.00008573551,0.0017022868,0.011489587,0.00009040642,0.00056674937,0.027407387,0.00031607712,0.0002804414,0.6010244,0.35677752,0.00019158926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071793357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009064725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1381822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013076199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01709373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.730786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112676116","doi":"10.1136/jme.2005.014670","title":"Trust based obligations of the state and physician-researchers to patient-subjects: Figure 1","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Harm; Duty; Subject (documents); Clinical equipoise; Medicine; Voluntarism (philosophy); Obligation; Duty to protect; Clinical trial; Psychology; Public relations; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.5574794807903379,"score_gpt":0.6181967822179772,"score_spread":0.060717301427639314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112676116","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017427014,0.03979149,0.25737303,0.43140125,0.004438341,0.0039791726,0.0005341179,0.00033372297,0.24472187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5861863,0.022466175,0.17486414,0.15189059,0.0018998936,0.0061819614,0.00025783095,0.00010382656,0.056149356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9340671,0.048278395,0.004445091,0.0034983545,0.0070945662,0.0026165792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9470241,0.040259074,0.0037800497,0.0027378087,0.0049436907,0.0012552318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.061159074,0.0006888053,0.0014332373,0.0008688159,0.0042381184,0.0067867907,0.0027278832,0.021069424,0.0074230065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.082874455,0.001413857,0.0018725528,0.0008183706,0.020045545,0.013705699,0.0046809097,0.010757711,0.0025687693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007386113,0.000019499466,0.0003385357,0.0005860987,0.000025209603,0.00018877457,0.0022217196,0.00029404805,0.0002100475,0.95970064,0.016444355,0.019897247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031358414,0.00016868571,0.0015622057,0.0055070645,0.00014117437,0.0019500104,0.002837546,0.002131511,0.0010826596,0.56541675,0.41873896,0.00014976485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008489199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008897922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061159074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009329776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017968168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32344395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114145320","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2013-101673","title":"Are hybrid umbilical cord blood banks really the best of both worlds?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Izaak Walton Killam Health Centre; University of Calgary; Alberta Children's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Umbilical cord; Donation; Business; Product (mathematics); Finance; Medicine; Economics; Immunology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.04697136451932709,"score_gpt":0.34906235554770737,"score_spread":0.3020909910283803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114145320","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043590244,0.3277647,0.020615224,0.5296281,0.0074363146,0.00005446572,0.00015624697,0.00014988797,0.07060482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48077086,0.33962667,0.025240721,0.12687449,0.01156488,0.0001585714,0.00022213385,0.0001688333,0.015372872],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99627244,0.0019841574,0.00023532304,0.00021726309,0.0009868477,0.00030402167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927859,0.004332583,0.00091695285,0.00047577015,0.0008150152,0.0006736633],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068396693,0.00028659328,0.00062161643,0.00047374974,0.00090337277,0.0072479923,0.00074983435,0.0044978396,0.0053857015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01797853,0.00019798325,0.0003334523,0.0008158459,0.004593746,0.009664683,0.0023491147,0.0032296188,0.002014648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004802222,0.00016431711,0.007954107,0.0018389471,0.0001240197,0.0023623663,0.0022148052,0.0005679804,0.0014503404,0.35009736,0.0847252,0.54802036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083451145,0.00027513405,0.003857147,0.0037359556,0.0001310694,0.018231342,0.009351708,0.000994227,0.0020607777,0.24240158,0.71877205,0.000105623614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061581394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00103551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9955022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015470653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015085714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036172032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115053225","doi":"10.1136/jme.2008.027789","title":"Stimulating brains, altering minds","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Neurological disorders and treatments","field":"Medicine","cited_by":162,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Deep brain stimulation; Brain function; Harm; Personality; Neuroscience; Psychology; Disease; Stimulation; Brain disease; Brain stimulation; Parkinson's disease; Medicine; Psychiatry; Social psychology; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.08054795705397634,"score_gpt":0.41195978238590847,"score_spread":0.33141182533193214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115053225","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.098277576,0.07171523,0.09649655,0.13880701,0.007301879,0.00014909284,0.00009785032,0.0003916709,0.58676314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8406045,0.028296351,0.036294114,0.027432414,0.002120562,0.00019898707,0.000028010325,0.0001258464,0.064899266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993223,0.0004046182,0.000018320801,0.000045440604,0.00016730724,0.000042065065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992687,0.0004526957,0.00006772463,0.000073552255,0.00006128881,0.00007593513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009030926,0.00019763921,0.00012607638,0.00023388772,0.00078736467,0.0015716135,0.00024686023,0.0010288404,0.0030609204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00263155,0.000067570596,0.00017751462,0.00013772317,0.005543833,0.0017260433,0.0012503612,0.0011522719,0.00071311474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014903361,0.00008725987,0.0011061964,0.000614713,0.000027920243,0.00059284363,0.010267284,0.00074701593,0.015269718,0.7699829,0.027583553,0.17357148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006642421,0.000205017,0.0016073772,0.00029501255,0.000025784768,0.0025174273,0.0034105463,0.0005303889,0.005304499,0.47688293,0.5091271,0.00002748342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028250314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051775464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0030609204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046398697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005790264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01023978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115717399","doi":"10.1136/jme.2005.014589","title":"The need for a clinical ethics service and its goals in a community healthcare service centre: a survey","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Clinical Research Institute","funders":"National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke","keywords":"Health care; Service (business); Service provider; Public relations; Information ethics; Service delivery framework; Nursing ethics; Research ethics; Medicine; Sociology; Nursing; Business; Political science; Law; Marketing","score_opus":0.5063043996407767,"score_gpt":0.6371537282451479,"score_spread":0.13084932860437126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115717399","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99191356,0.00028041762,0.00022594225,0.0053135674,0.00002082402,0.00027037674,0.00012584747,0.00001240001,0.0018370798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996232,0.0003561317,0.0005918594,0.0019024418,0.000016216898,0.00024168099,0.00007812,0.000008210076,0.00057335466],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914791,0.0035680411,0.0005724829,0.00032550227,0.001633922,0.002420993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95050275,0.009812698,0.0068240375,0.0005263669,0.009179051,0.023155097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011762513,0.00020349136,0.00038485482,0.0016194321,0.0046966355,0.0028252404,0.0008840005,0.0017611368,0.0035725574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025026567,0.0005732359,0.00023893073,0.001229355,0.002310007,0.0023691335,0.0021314765,0.002645149,0.00044279234],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017916084,0.0007666576,0.8223778,0.00046652378,0.000026269177,0.0013140248,0.13801022,0.00008743401,0.0015613749,0.00061157905,0.009410582,0.025188359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041263647,0.00076250045,0.5782337,0.0004910729,0.000012987142,0.0010450302,0.40111217,0.0005994577,0.00020144263,0.00015310614,0.017277328,0.00006993798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1006373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17387882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1006373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009813194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02199582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2001031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115809010","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2014-102319","title":"Infant male circumcision and the autonomy of the child: two ethical questions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Best interests; Nothing; Psychology; Clinical Ethics; Social psychology; Male circumcision; Medicine; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Population","score_opus":0.11326713860165652,"score_gpt":0.5044116300681447,"score_spread":0.3911444914664882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115809010","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000102396196,0.9966562,0.000046380464,0.002517461,0.00011300552,8.8994665e-7,8.729383e-7,4.6425998e-7,0.0005623113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033407432,0.99423695,0.00012285571,0.0016894658,0.0003736372,0.0000055252412,0.000002974516,0.0000010107202,0.00022681364],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974093,0.0015538763,0.00023130179,0.00015803284,0.00053217856,0.000115311086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931786,0.0057117427,0.0005482653,0.00007866735,0.00036570962,0.000116917254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030762544,0.0004432706,0.0010426586,0.0015743304,0.0006926513,0.001893807,0.00087314966,0.0036348728,0.0016378133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008304375,0.00024802473,0.0005164913,0.0022116664,0.004234498,0.0035361096,0.001697897,0.0038321067,0.0003695974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005759156,0.000046088364,0.0006568594,0.025697723,0.000096101394,0.0008823357,0.0030282342,0.00038790627,0.00032748454,0.12710954,0.030332288,0.8113778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002251118,0.00008860763,0.0025577047,0.06961954,0.00012540996,0.005794404,0.0027716083,0.000099273886,0.00026599265,0.03713691,0.8814738,0.000044249784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027935742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033092522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036348728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015295066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004647443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016268969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116352333","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2013-101410","title":"The placebo effect in psychiatry: problem or solution?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pain Management and Placebo Effect","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Placebo; Viewpoints; Perspective (graphical); Placebo response; Psychiatry; Psychotherapist; Psychology; Clinical trial; Work (physics); Alternative medicine; Medicine; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.039054664341362184,"score_gpt":0.35164187585080803,"score_spread":0.31258721150944585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116352333","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031685006,0.03967844,0.0066109565,0.94377667,0.008072968,0.00002245256,0.000011898631,0.000020109843,0.0014895719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08431937,0.16245551,0.048565272,0.57237035,0.1271139,0.0007488621,0.00006717114,0.00012915536,0.0042305323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96191853,0.026121084,0.002765907,0.0031653221,0.0049434113,0.0010856334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89387876,0.09211971,0.003355928,0.0024186207,0.0066999258,0.001527108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06988975,0.0016879033,0.004471149,0.0031437727,0.0052992147,0.0123861935,0.006390782,0.03906227,0.0046741185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.114835694,0.0008936155,0.0019250307,0.0022429875,0.051191207,0.031910256,0.009698831,0.040201165,0.0018219583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013203183,0.000077829274,0.00046079062,0.003098046,0.00013863947,0.0009435264,0.0047711437,0.00047493374,0.00021367759,0.7821532,0.07290804,0.13462819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080719394,0.00005974941,0.00015798394,0.0025760094,0.00003507185,0.0008749703,0.00488201,0.00060869183,0.00007874988,0.9025586,0.08803124,0.000056222278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025089704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002553703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06988975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006829962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014487484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36961675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116691119","doi":"10.1136/jme.2009.034421","title":"The use of methylphenidate among students: the future of enhancement?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Methylphenidate; Popularity; Cognition; Argument (complex analysis); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Clinical psychology; Psychiatry; Medicine; Social psychology; Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder","score_opus":0.12443787394165273,"score_gpt":0.4166089261707557,"score_spread":0.29217105222910295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116691119","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035741698,0.1270372,0.0022840116,0.79796374,0.0010362257,0.000035731548,0.000034611337,0.000030091333,0.03583676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66204655,0.20011118,0.0053978623,0.121911265,0.0050930963,0.000119757024,0.000031535874,0.000022680433,0.005266112],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99532795,0.003285672,0.00015685875,0.00030303528,0.00059387076,0.00033263638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9801287,0.015536937,0.0012905041,0.0007872794,0.0011736942,0.0010828831],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010740045,0.00022835072,0.0005240226,0.00054042734,0.0012448432,0.0037375414,0.00072956836,0.0052078385,0.0036524762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016139595,0.00014721754,0.00043124182,0.00042837686,0.007970395,0.005949008,0.002483701,0.00415593,0.00040747522],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053833,0.0003895652,0.012026611,0.0018294886,0.00006365599,0.000679417,0.0072571086,0.00024564707,0.0020932208,0.23628443,0.012934086,0.72565836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019621996,0.002253423,0.041263532,0.009074482,0.00021575738,0.0038500603,0.016157117,0.0010453,0.0047191246,0.35634026,0.56474346,0.00014128679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020429029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029745873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010740045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002197115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004146862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05679947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116759841","doi":"10.1136/jme.2004.011213","title":"Britain’s new preimplantation tissue typing policy: an ethical defence","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Savior sibling; Preimplantation genetic diagnosis; Tissue Donation; Medicine; Transplantation; Bone marrow; Biology; Genetics; Embryo; Pathology; Surgery; Organ donation; Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation","score_opus":0.1404884134121764,"score_gpt":0.49269168709452354,"score_spread":0.35220327368234716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116759841","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013787228,0.84869933,0.00042683273,0.13339971,0.0050308607,0.000035361067,0.00012259299,0.000025754245,0.0108807525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028892549,0.8675352,0.0032141884,0.08200375,0.0029051274,0.0001141156,0.00025354163,0.000046347446,0.0150352605],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99375314,0.0024845174,0.0010211027,0.0002716983,0.0021480545,0.00032159142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9771607,0.015567236,0.002062608,0.0007393231,0.0036106547,0.0008595352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013276167,0.00031536355,0.0015354054,0.0016872414,0.00084610004,0.0033495845,0.0010077227,0.0050397012,0.0039312956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024457613,0.00047506936,0.0005267044,0.002704392,0.0024100395,0.0030002554,0.0013543946,0.0050876103,0.00083209854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014061308,0.000042162683,0.0005769731,0.015620707,0.00006938285,0.0012564384,0.001753896,0.00020813654,0.0011347505,0.033686806,0.45533755,0.4901726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033232398,0.000037511072,0.0019080878,0.008382678,0.000041672112,0.00079539715,0.00028592805,0.00002278423,0.0001263055,0.001856754,0.98649246,0.000017249293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012118006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028907446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013276167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052790875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016221687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07021195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116897959","doi":"10.1136/jme.2004.013193","title":"Women’s reproductive autonomy: medicalisation and beyond","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Welfare; Poverty; Reproduction; Sociology; Political science; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.08706329593493715,"score_gpt":0.40599516880556774,"score_spread":0.3189318728706306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116897959","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001081436,0.9971859,0.000031245407,0.0015655851,0.000092977,0.0000010519841,6.344569e-7,7.275673e-7,0.0010137723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0041644555,0.99423605,0.00007595198,0.0008117189,0.0003242338,0.0000046559553,0.0000023766463,6.2141544e-7,0.00037992327],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874264,0.0006678363,0.00009635528,0.00007551121,0.00033890773,0.00007874601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980552,0.0014076114,0.00020516194,0.000045000925,0.000203472,0.00008362922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020011293,0.00043206706,0.0011592392,0.0017181884,0.00062940514,0.0015002384,0.00069809397,0.0026209934,0.0017678208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003376741,0.00023652044,0.0003581342,0.00226908,0.0032695387,0.002486538,0.0011633653,0.0022464327,0.00038941484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056886423,0.00007608565,0.00051004504,0.011392361,0.0000585335,0.0006025211,0.0019344732,0.0003718741,0.00042271882,0.054114953,0.029879242,0.9005803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002626443,0.000095011455,0.00262731,0.018190833,0.00003844078,0.003235512,0.0014206192,0.000112957874,0.00021367958,0.023690563,0.95032316,0.00002558384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027702134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039902176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0027702134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018298895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036134217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013276875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117114928","doi":"10.1136/jme.2008.025346","title":"The case for re-thinking incest laws","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Sexual intercourse; Intervention (counseling); Criminology; German; Psychology; Sister; Law; Sociology; Psychiatry; Political science; Social psychology; Demography; Population; History","score_opus":0.19528000325988426,"score_gpt":0.4564334402189912,"score_spread":0.2611534369591069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117114928","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015157566,0.0035774512,0.0050452314,0.8588153,0.0024474224,0.00003536975,0.00002614858,0.000067245506,0.11482823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4377993,0.0024232157,0.004510524,0.5137023,0.0031282022,0.00015660272,0.000038626204,0.0001663178,0.03807488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9807258,0.008742834,0.00060717016,0.0021805412,0.0044137794,0.0033298656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97189605,0.017361695,0.0016254996,0.003112834,0.0032898714,0.002714099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023800304,0.00042788507,0.000724966,0.000775234,0.009130684,0.009572198,0.0026557837,0.032895826,0.0065590898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054529488,0.00051041116,0.0009735868,0.0004955967,0.043703586,0.016519753,0.0071396246,0.04395376,0.0015128432],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013724954,0.00002273377,0.00036352722,0.000021539938,0.0000060747902,0.00061620335,0.0051838453,0.000082495775,0.00010635242,0.9562664,0.032598216,0.0047189915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029120909,0.00002299981,0.00026150074,0.00029707025,0.000013973418,0.0008533694,0.0066436813,0.0003414088,0.00031797015,0.6697903,0.32138926,0.000039356462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062901224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064409394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032895826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045127864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008843826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12586951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117266406","doi":"10.1136/jme.2006.019976","title":"Is Tom Shakespeare disabled?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Mainstream; Intellectual disability; Disability studies; Achondroplasia; Disabled people; Social model of disability; Temptation; Gender studies; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Medicine; Political science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.12404443024291546,"score_gpt":0.499225866216917,"score_spread":0.37518143597400155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117266406","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007741397,0.08119339,0.0013208492,0.50913304,0.026988966,0.000018538969,0.0002621514,0.00010163173,0.37323996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16826826,0.06462514,0.0011637126,0.15982175,0.009405428,0.000044181637,0.0003050902,0.00022730225,0.5961392],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984856,0.00039985642,0.000055839606,0.00023882123,0.0004913878,0.0003285941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856466,0.00036682675,0.00009203805,0.00008836698,0.00033305868,0.0005551293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014412126,0.00038086635,0.0004708192,0.0010824647,0.008716014,0.0077862367,0.0005970852,0.003158929,0.028011084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003925819,0.00029082943,0.0001796492,0.0010807383,0.009646062,0.0072366674,0.0026148963,0.0038293772,0.009649255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026186768,0.000017539702,0.0011423244,0.00016143537,0.0000065743843,0.00045707467,0.009766091,0.000019731287,0.00012882205,0.08838828,0.84290123,0.05698476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016447864,0.000005861639,0.00070048874,0.00023470304,0.0000021640608,0.0003036918,0.006247349,0.000010571083,0.000041285562,0.0058815572,0.9865621,0.00000870757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04463871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05960514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04463871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050288024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052562007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09370643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117887411","doi":"10.1136/jme.28.1.37","title":"Is there an advocate in the house? The role of health care professionals in patient advocacy","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cancer Care Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Consumer Advocacy; Patient advocacy; Health professionals; Medicine; Health care; Nursing; MEDLINE; Political science; Public relations; Data science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.27390992399067693,"score_gpt":0.595617720362545,"score_spread":0.3217077963718681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117887411","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005191701,0.9588656,0.0011200126,0.02593435,0.0009546149,0.0000215709,0.000002161432,0.000007730167,0.012574717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023345435,0.9539874,0.0028422053,0.01475187,0.0012459776,0.000069993424,0.0000048754255,0.000007942228,0.0037443766],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875853,0.008435687,0.0005795377,0.00042754726,0.0026071453,0.00036474242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97940695,0.017389473,0.0011105179,0.00033605375,0.0012019052,0.00055504264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014552754,0.00039621317,0.0012443601,0.0020131653,0.0024005852,0.0047293836,0.0009512175,0.005190769,0.0027255113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020942809,0.0003595616,0.0004099616,0.0031268692,0.0062178676,0.0069931615,0.0022736185,0.004612544,0.0014634263],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005248838,0.00008338625,0.00071168784,0.008985983,0.00005455118,0.0006596839,0.005680004,0.00011036162,0.0003038474,0.1425049,0.02880052,0.8120526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036348443,0.000096169286,0.0016588964,0.024750067,0.00007323035,0.004154303,0.008359521,0.000133388,0.00027612186,0.06384135,0.8965854,0.000035209297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025051737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004680936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014552754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028112973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008216844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076963246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117941509","doi":"10.1136/jme.2010.035451","title":"Ethical considerations for classifying patients as ‘palliative’ when calculating Hospital Standardised Mortality Ratios","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; London Health Sciences Centre; Western University; University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Palliative care; Statistic; Medicine; Nursing; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2398516124227503,"score_gpt":0.5157182015512686,"score_spread":0.27586658912851825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117941509","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042683862,0.012186249,0.24480139,0.6400472,0.02143412,0.0041293385,0.0007925525,0.0004765334,0.033448696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3282622,0.0064629577,0.5029202,0.13176148,0.012345539,0.009815838,0.0005023145,0.00065631786,0.007273158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.21429661,0.699344,0.04493136,0.003982454,0.035214182,0.0022314056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.16862401,0.69685715,0.03471286,0.031033393,0.06521336,0.0035592334],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.5129357,0.0013051777,0.0021311522,0.0064506596,0.004593661,0.0120136645,0.005292749,0.007947,0.0023259383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7375319,0.0013356279,0.0015400302,0.010176202,0.01943869,0.0072012907,0.0066619227,0.011065745,0.001304893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011059097,0.00029118007,0.040809773,0.003589954,0.00048149156,0.0032177474,0.115151696,0.0027760428,0.0022013704,0.36612213,0.21992221,0.24433042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044804876,0.000574224,0.03443441,0.02103802,0.00036351947,0.0077321073,0.08087733,0.017611299,0.0066951397,0.36596414,0.46347323,0.0007884816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010627835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01920419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5129357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008859812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01764115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6006371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118085872","doi":"10.1136/jme.2004.007815","title":"Commentary on the Olivieri symposium","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; St. Boniface Hospital; University of Victoria; Saint Mary's University; Western University; St. Mary's University; St Joseph's Health Care; Brampton Civic Hospital; Trillium Health Centre; William Osler Health System","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Constructive; Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.04826708013232368,"score_gpt":0.3659087608008697,"score_spread":0.31764168066854603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118085872","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013584686,0.0028941263,0.000038006347,0.9709669,0.023041844,0.0000047797166,0.000022838485,0.00000887017,0.0028867484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00434824,0.0019073467,0.00009879617,0.9601753,0.023439331,0.000021866324,0.000018513076,0.000051423838,0.009939206],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837316,0.0035048907,0.00072201045,0.0023089312,0.0067885336,0.0029440585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96488214,0.017908582,0.0015664538,0.0009912697,0.009538687,0.0051127467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018990364,0.0010982597,0.0016220657,0.0013698798,0.016375698,0.008477861,0.006217049,0.042194188,0.010598828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08501058,0.0008613027,0.00182654,0.0016891806,0.011524298,0.00651928,0.0043915357,0.05975774,0.0028552534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016846157,0.0000036661356,0.00005117106,0.000035107627,0.0000045524175,0.00009170271,0.00029215886,0.000014109601,0.000013295027,0.0040321574,0.9938226,0.0016225995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018459652,0.0000065137147,0.00047518552,0.00036996423,0.000017524113,0.00015618207,0.0009717294,0.00004347032,0.000074191325,0.002809936,0.995023,0.0000338951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26490396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36161187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26490396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029163098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041271724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5267241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118248473","doi":"10.1136/jme.2008.024810","title":"Can a moral reasoning exercise improve response quality to surveys of healthcare priorities?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Respondent; Preference; Health care; Intervention (counseling); Consistency (knowledge bases); Psychology; Quality (philosophy); Moral reasoning; Family medicine; Medicine; Social psychology; Nursing; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.5260973093178622,"score_gpt":0.5170965421181688,"score_spread":0.009000767199693449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118248473","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84950465,0.0013804642,0.08204438,0.040224038,0.00095006387,0.013611685,0.0005081527,0.0009417746,0.010834788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89833456,0.00026793338,0.08520982,0.0037222148,0.00036175197,0.011389156,0.00014540982,0.000042625674,0.0005265408],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.46339068,0.50676155,0.009661286,0.005065943,0.01220703,0.0029135228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.31327486,0.6003184,0.043153863,0.026842825,0.011033412,0.005376586],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.41772532,0.0009231344,0.0014485505,0.0023700385,0.0013271075,0.0027302033,0.0022218768,0.0036944568,0.0054775625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6065248,0.0008369859,0.0022143638,0.0024218617,0.0023930976,0.0041975155,0.003962938,0.0020629328,0.001084727],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017679572,0.01649566,0.17961255,0.0037267066,0.0022732285,0.00013527913,0.011889757,0.0075533385,0.0022302258,0.003355304,0.008755652,0.7462927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.025965579,0.072168216,0.7555666,0.0060714628,0.0022367137,0.00040528484,0.007788095,0.07311974,0.0075738593,0.028136147,0.020188019,0.0007802011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013839633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018805169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5822747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025724568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004819241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71804833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118295721","doi":"10.1136/jme.2005.012575","title":"Psychopharmacology and memory","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Memory and Neural Mechanisms","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Psychopharmacology; Amygdala; Hippocampus; Neuroscience; Prefrontal cortex; Computer science; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Psychiatry; Cognition","score_opus":0.341896473173168,"score_gpt":0.5210830127209514,"score_spread":0.17918653954778335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118295721","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002848335,0.9900592,0.00025718435,0.00086643326,0.0003371053,0.000008144946,0.00001062664,0.000011260088,0.008165187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0070731123,0.98038906,0.0005064011,0.0013155738,0.00068273715,0.00002509677,0.000022069617,0.0000052320447,0.009980763],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961424,0.000108627486,0.000040214178,0.00005382207,0.00014727634,0.000035889967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971384,0.0001309274,0.000044789424,0.000028100716,0.000056654568,0.000025683805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004878836,0.000732213,0.0011746555,0.0012161476,0.0005438254,0.0018303276,0.0010209525,0.001958186,0.009803469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008273645,0.00017629171,0.00033622293,0.0011900669,0.0020101126,0.0018805525,0.00095845293,0.0016129523,0.003985918],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044548437,0.00009738981,0.00022238688,0.0048039854,0.0000401825,0.0005573084,0.00026607318,0.0001515081,0.0023354494,0.0215322,0.032017384,0.9379315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016232676,0.00006970128,0.001315848,0.0020389485,0.00002496619,0.003832452,0.00020961168,0.000046302786,0.0007061534,0.017712591,0.9740147,0.000012497205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00096572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012952529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009803469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008764672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013261769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032795906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118644202","doi":"10.1136/jme.2004.010595","title":"Project Examining Effectiveness in Clinical Ethics (PEECE): phase 1—descriptive analysis of nine clinical ethics services","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Sciences Centre; Sunnybrook Health Science Centre; University of Toronto","funders":"Hospital for Sick Children; University of Toronto; Toronto Rehabilitation Institute","keywords":"Benchmarking; Accountability; Service delivery framework; Service (business); Best practice; Scope (computer science); Business ethics; Descriptive statistics; Medicine; Medical education; Public relations; Political science; Business; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.49647479878106393,"score_gpt":0.6842085218543379,"score_spread":0.18773372307327396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118644202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98342574,0.00016043428,0.0021703767,0.0002503539,0.000010082586,0.009201854,0.0019719729,0.000029510786,0.002779688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96165437,0.00028500834,0.007969402,0.0002498462,0.000016983013,0.025647243,0.0023973288,0.000040143987,0.0017397571],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9783215,0.012397684,0.0021810466,0.0010129686,0.0037460048,0.0023408032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.939879,0.030559663,0.010425023,0.00314675,0.012234645,0.0037548875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028132021,0.00059895613,0.000826251,0.005920435,0.0027935635,0.0027377256,0.0018345892,0.0007742086,0.002793646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06220432,0.0008630513,0.00075247965,0.0050392416,0.0028215807,0.0027677512,0.0062301904,0.0020291477,0.00057046005],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011394771,0.0066666356,0.6520998,0.0024205935,0.000104446,0.0010748513,0.1727933,0.0010783565,0.0013918254,0.0030220565,0.006531335,0.15167731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023999257,0.0034274133,0.70854396,0.0006786858,0.000051043793,0.00086991244,0.26889738,0.0015528125,0.0024956886,0.001138169,0.012025577,0.000079393416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011318871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014871595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028132021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009540533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018242372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14877814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119111030","doi":"10.1136/jme.2010.042069","title":"Bioethics in a clinic for women with psychosis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alphora Research (Canada); University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Psychosis; Psychiatry; Medicine; Psychology; Data science; Family medicine; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.826339660559571,"score_gpt":0.6733824418719813,"score_spread":0.1529572186875897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119111030","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23809461,0.0045769573,0.0037293297,0.6956544,0.004427369,0.00042600048,0.000030074883,0.000107723776,0.0529535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83920604,0.0028940772,0.008908488,0.12588948,0.0019016948,0.00037308477,0.000014314138,0.00007948867,0.020733291],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98758274,0.008453125,0.0003382788,0.00061954977,0.0008706326,0.0021357685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799381,0.0065111592,0.0014504154,0.00038488064,0.00066713727,0.011048357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013910729,0.00047890263,0.00059042533,0.0006844077,0.04167736,0.008209464,0.0019849157,0.013219899,0.011847587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020788116,0.00091764785,0.00074412435,0.0007459095,0.018530687,0.0040248306,0.012229697,0.019107742,0.0013040663],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004316196,0.0016646016,0.028992997,0.00046168672,0.000052123007,0.14747818,0.4358232,0.00077180174,0.004591337,0.13106492,0.16370708,0.08496055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027409822,0.0009409784,0.008412166,0.0011591094,0.000031272964,0.06484654,0.5015464,0.00095144135,0.00092027354,0.09065806,0.33004397,0.00021570094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004375821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02160839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04167736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077874158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020324623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07356781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120324893","doi":"10.1136/jme.2007.021832","title":"A pilot study of bullying and harassment among medical professionals in Pakistan, focussing on psychiatry: need for a medical ombudsman","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Workplace Violence and Bullying","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Psychiatry; Medical education; Medicine; Psychology; Nursing","score_opus":0.08835422585483628,"score_gpt":0.4574704126801956,"score_spread":0.36911618682535935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120324893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998862,0.000051933566,0.000064718464,0.00017242959,0.000014655577,0.00039332878,0.00003957613,0.0000021383519,0.00039922344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964443,0.00038347126,0.0005330436,0.0007445221,0.000046047848,0.00071533106,0.00008037055,0.0000030021872,0.001049961],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847835,0.0006372098,0.00010457267,0.00011093901,0.0001770445,0.0004919174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964037,0.00093195896,0.00046873104,0.00012841134,0.0007314583,0.0013357782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036986577,0.00051617733,0.00049187726,0.0010339578,0.004674615,0.0010677945,0.00061112124,0.0009576953,0.0031218256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005583194,0.0012235665,0.00047175863,0.0007286036,0.0013798448,0.0012889133,0.0014683498,0.0017796041,0.00068171014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007253771,0.009688673,0.53673315,0.00082929194,0.000039632716,0.009654559,0.4061772,0.000095494855,0.007311476,0.00021672237,0.0016473939,0.026881134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014817089,0.0146100605,0.54644835,0.00011743201,0.000027170106,0.0014568599,0.43423158,0.00010264859,0.00040288473,0.00005249151,0.0023688155,0.000033613214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029894548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08142688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029894548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019161262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004710936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05944109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120552255","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2013-101543","title":"Anaesthesia, amnesia and harm","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Anesthesia and Sedative Agents","field":"Medicine","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Unconsciousness; Amnesia; Harm; Consciousness; Intraoperative Awareness; Anesthesia; Anterograde amnesia; Psychology; Medicine; General anaesthesia; Arousal; Implicit memory; Psychiatry; Cognition; Neuroscience; Social psychology; Propofol","score_opus":0.05412111687538386,"score_gpt":0.370254178685427,"score_spread":0.31613306181004314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120552255","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22027095,0.292113,0.013817539,0.16050337,0.005628717,0.00020098491,0.00013341087,0.00013608932,0.3071958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86661714,0.075148515,0.0035234601,0.02080395,0.0032728093,0.00010798848,0.000042255237,0.000035307425,0.030448543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985031,0.00061932,0.00015693845,0.00007029742,0.00044236332,0.0002081414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809366,0.0007948238,0.000644582,0.0001392748,0.00015948727,0.0001682216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00129189,0.00035666535,0.00030027406,0.00072594354,0.0010790476,0.0016218647,0.0003172519,0.0023177168,0.002369645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00629116,0.0001660882,0.00043995766,0.00037540853,0.0071142074,0.0023757897,0.002634172,0.002893934,0.0004261043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034029345,0.00021570556,0.022816489,0.0016040266,0.00009864312,0.028852463,0.017132722,0.0006894538,0.004088934,0.61725295,0.03334426,0.273564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046532667,0.0004978463,0.033122372,0.0022875238,0.00007916794,0.13276649,0.011190933,0.0003880521,0.002019752,0.4321468,0.38537166,0.00008289952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012118199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012570405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002369645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010179064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017090979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007927239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121440967","doi":"10.1136/jme.2009.032169","title":"When physicians forego the doctor–patient relationship, should they elect to self-prescribe or curbside? An empirical and ethical analysis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medical prescription; Family medicine; Medicine; Spouse; Nursing; Law","score_opus":0.6239728903641669,"score_gpt":0.6365905079720495,"score_spread":0.012617617607882603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121440967","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84259206,0.0058111707,0.007821963,0.10534715,0.00044539286,0.0008638116,0.00011453382,0.00001533874,0.03698862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914614,0.0010995758,0.0015873691,0.0050306995,0.00011035135,0.0002118632,0.000017237591,0.000008583471,0.000472916],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.6796992,0.26798347,0.011075014,0.004860616,0.03030697,0.006074745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.19158071,0.7032768,0.06281231,0.008977469,0.026853211,0.006499459],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.21974778,0.0002735771,0.0005301726,0.0032429192,0.007251599,0.007298254,0.0018018682,0.0031352441,0.0030637619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.46696874,0.00053031486,0.00068067695,0.0035529449,0.02338994,0.0076391366,0.0052578463,0.006002235,0.00026473336],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050315476,0.0006941612,0.46711406,0.0013265425,0.00025128704,0.0018621124,0.3165457,0.00045135617,0.00026104733,0.13031648,0.0142077245,0.066466354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010769104,0.00040724952,0.11873376,0.0038058825,0.00019780081,0.0022964044,0.8104967,0.0023518982,0.0005515561,0.025169626,0.03577204,0.00010949286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004527574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067565925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21974778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014410962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020553268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9621899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121711654","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2012-100551","title":"Ethical concerns for maternal surrogacy and reproductive tourism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Medical tourism; Liberian dollar; Tourism; Ethical issues; Reproductive rights; Political science; Economic growth; Reproductive health; Environmental ethics; Business; Medicine; Engineering ethics; Law; Environmental health; Economics; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.12840016122347225,"score_gpt":0.46272698333422563,"score_spread":0.3343268221107534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121711654","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03422205,0.010138938,0.00536078,0.8381078,0.001534867,0.00003262485,0.0000144761,0.000014824563,0.110573635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8052873,0.008795015,0.008102572,0.15797609,0.0022299003,0.00013473256,0.000018223116,0.000029212333,0.01742681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9754014,0.019335112,0.0005348251,0.0005411583,0.0032310188,0.0009565412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9760936,0.019133508,0.0011919785,0.0008007283,0.0011478513,0.0016322833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027117247,0.00027305257,0.0002846723,0.00060029776,0.010027416,0.0056757447,0.0010179906,0.011517412,0.0023747594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03420274,0.00021410057,0.00054979796,0.00066934637,0.035879523,0.0034484777,0.0071482393,0.012453517,0.00033975317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019796411,0.000024106814,0.0016636304,0.00006627778,0.000005112909,0.0013133148,0.023747036,0.0002134272,0.0002265523,0.935811,0.016029293,0.020880438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023519868,0.00007413828,0.0018741252,0.0009833757,0.000014475475,0.006892244,0.043877795,0.00058950234,0.00034455745,0.61005443,0.33522135,0.000050610302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022609679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005147656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027117247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002838767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009694097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14341146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122515369","doi":"10.1136/jme.2010.040675","title":"Authorship policies of bioethics journals: Table 1","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Alberta; University of Ottawa","funders":"National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Bioethics; Acknowledgement; Engineering ethics; Empirical research; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.8819711830909628,"score_gpt":0.6805012307891853,"score_spread":0.20146995230177744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122515369","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42985815,0.018661086,0.028752841,0.100500666,0.0042147334,0.0019480375,0.012124277,0.0015998344,0.40234035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8505857,0.0049496563,0.036328875,0.015052897,0.0013482388,0.0014901435,0.0056729717,0.0005587964,0.08401266],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.89172083,0.04774265,0.022527188,0.0039774887,0.028293308,0.005738555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.48385033,0.28772858,0.06777741,0.030551469,0.10864365,0.021448502],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06280258,0.00042421764,0.0006275923,0.007837183,0.0039122473,0.008843187,0.001824296,0.0030971398,0.016962681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2619802,0.0005502074,0.0006378006,0.009096524,0.0017903193,0.004811353,0.0030961891,0.0019987016,0.007259702],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00076511834,0.0003973074,0.30651674,0.0027507402,0.0002719541,0.0014465865,0.022142082,0.0018458265,0.004562108,0.108893335,0.16429739,0.38611087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024980315,0.0003853947,0.16184467,0.0033236647,0.00016017527,0.003962184,0.013668043,0.002611795,0.006622737,0.039406046,0.7674653,0.00030026163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014054058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013915395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9969029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039570495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011738199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3321358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123011221","doi":"10.1136/jme.2006.017954","title":"Reflective professionalism: interpreting CanMEDS’ “professionalism”: Table 1","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Innovations in Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Medical education; Accountability; Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.10220439994291247,"score_gpt":0.5204174073310824,"score_spread":0.41821300738816997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123011221","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05613366,0.0041636685,0.03505248,0.07710156,0.0030383074,0.0003081541,0.0007724193,0.0003139828,0.82311577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86441034,0.0024985098,0.05206182,0.0124171125,0.00060009974,0.00034476767,0.0011128283,0.00032284373,0.06623176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908777,0.005769049,0.00042076784,0.0003509326,0.0018106011,0.00077103043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98859686,0.0063709524,0.0006709193,0.00058392854,0.0027589183,0.0010184604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066832523,0.00040626296,0.00025232526,0.0024810776,0.0046903626,0.007686989,0.001361848,0.0018196868,0.012583516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023621565,0.00020558278,0.00023249765,0.00230791,0.007933313,0.004595796,0.003561717,0.002323379,0.001977761],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007736742,0.000039427625,0.004796867,0.00046733647,0.000010609656,0.00109167,0.17898998,0.00022701304,0.0006694193,0.55705905,0.16887935,0.08769193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010477792,0.000020163909,0.0066499324,0.000629611,0.0000068861714,0.0014863655,0.08596116,0.00048282332,0.0006352012,0.08319127,0.8208902,0.000035884746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02341507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034332886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02341507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061543626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066212486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046557546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123438626","doi":"10.1136/jme.26.1.37","title":"Ethical considerations in international HIV vaccine trials: summary of a consultative process conducted by the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS","keywords":"Safeguarding; HIV vaccine; Developing country; Medicine; Clinical trial; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); AIDS Vaccines; Economic growth; Informed consent; Developed country; Political science; Environmental health; Family medicine; Alternative medicine; Nursing; Vaccine trial; Population","score_opus":0.12892783244736164,"score_gpt":0.4313862735105547,"score_spread":0.3024584410631931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123438626","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009974939,0.27431053,0.021765638,0.6530546,0.0087148445,0.0023977174,0.00026925927,0.00011944342,0.029393036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21898581,0.36829504,0.10194441,0.27508935,0.011606647,0.0049561257,0.0005979283,0.00029524817,0.018229507],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8003876,0.16050214,0.016143866,0.0017998425,0.017017148,0.004149428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7008584,0.24728991,0.014791893,0.0028358828,0.026785994,0.0074379425],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.22851168,0.0015564732,0.0013100392,0.0034459452,0.009414644,0.016303081,0.0022638221,0.01494062,0.0009937998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20866029,0.0009617978,0.0017908972,0.0062502054,0.009756814,0.008822043,0.007480807,0.018838923,0.00048643968],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024015304,0.0003414471,0.0025941157,0.011942068,0.000139329,0.003117141,0.1010391,0.0024481972,0.0013147447,0.21631357,0.2744636,0.38604656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078824625,0.00040367772,0.0059401128,0.025362633,0.00014183494,0.0023130723,0.040550802,0.0013402735,0.0015187665,0.06125307,0.86083394,0.00026308172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007599361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023942653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9850594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016740434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050849263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95138246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124699191","doi":"10.1136/jme.28.3.203","title":"One principle and three fallacies of disability studies","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Association on Gerontology; Anglo American (Canada); Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2988441407443604,"score_gpt":0.41469315826498276,"score_spread":0.11584901752062238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124699191","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013330592,0.005159568,0.002185674,0.9823184,0.0036312917,0.00005118703,0.000039619506,0.000015676118,0.0052655153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.061115324,0.005211728,0.006801152,0.90608215,0.015811516,0.0010610283,0.000053404267,0.000057492878,0.003806293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.84361154,0.09437902,0.008884034,0.012137761,0.037043355,0.003944312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6448515,0.29756257,0.009747371,0.018202648,0.018439824,0.011196053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.18797016,0.0012523028,0.004117925,0.0051728035,0.012550338,0.014838757,0.008154921,0.035564538,0.0035937426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23713206,0.0012157492,0.0021010833,0.0037179482,0.12088627,0.032180347,0.018862445,0.06269096,0.0013219436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012155709,0.000105417625,0.001661635,0.0005576629,0.00008842167,0.0003632975,0.0044662626,0.000065358916,0.000091512804,0.88770133,0.087322675,0.01745495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025525616,0.000107288826,0.0009434078,0.0016422691,0.000035545585,0.00064914604,0.004520515,0.0001911137,0.00014145455,0.875601,0.11582522,0.00008773512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056116804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007906031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18797016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010074962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014407753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9940931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124703080","doi":"10.1136/jme.2009.030866","title":"Free riding and organ donation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Organ donation; Computer science; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Medicine; Data science; Transplantation; Surgery","score_opus":0.024990145890238645,"score_gpt":0.3637214948321161,"score_spread":0.33873134894187745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124703080","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016737772,0.16577952,0.00843089,0.14209479,0.0045034904,0.00006207045,0.00028037082,0.000083908155,0.6620272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63430977,0.13563746,0.0029219221,0.036722533,0.0064798477,0.00019043805,0.00036823004,0.00013165807,0.18323801],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822134,0.00085316575,0.00007162951,0.00026045332,0.00029872972,0.00029465702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977336,0.0012704999,0.00024641276,0.0002052545,0.00026476575,0.00027938877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026201734,0.0003595532,0.0005827942,0.0008781031,0.003173135,0.0045443685,0.0011248009,0.0045827194,0.054432515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073061283,0.00015683887,0.00039656498,0.0011522087,0.011584813,0.0046887025,0.0042788847,0.0036340281,0.0036103756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026764808,0.00002395197,0.00033121323,0.000102402424,0.00000656003,0.000089737136,0.00060042157,0.00030525046,0.000034471926,0.9326402,0.033256177,0.032582905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013218251,0.000021100377,0.00045589145,0.0003315634,0.0000045144034,0.0001907156,0.0005365462,0.0001981427,0.00005387297,0.74073094,0.25745162,0.00001197824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061265053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005274077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054432515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030097896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022021858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18209487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124805033","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2013-101320","title":"What's trust got to do with it? Revisiting opioid contracts","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Opioid Use Disorder Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"NeuroDevNet; University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Distrust; Humility; Appeal; Credibility; Adversarial system; Context (archaeology); Compromise; Medical prescription; Psychology; Medicine; Chronic pain; Public relations; Social psychology; Psychiatry; Psychotherapist; Nursing; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03039623290554548,"score_gpt":0.3564840927840321,"score_spread":0.3260878598784866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124805033","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039424345,0.034293223,0.008122947,0.84808344,0.0037567918,0.000042509255,0.00005135131,0.000033009426,0.066192314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8873103,0.029348563,0.0027471248,0.07241943,0.002635324,0.000054469034,0.00003722441,0.00012477757,0.005322861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.94875294,0.033907957,0.002636871,0.002173168,0.008331737,0.0041973647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8155107,0.14345375,0.009973703,0.0062207994,0.01833017,0.006510913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052932918,0.00039511934,0.00095456204,0.0018425733,0.010181588,0.017072294,0.0022600053,0.009084367,0.0038456041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15320958,0.0006036504,0.000875738,0.002487843,0.052716024,0.037151825,0.009239607,0.017727304,0.00065276487],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053366646,0.000032382122,0.0027521406,0.0004782207,0.000034843877,0.0005833006,0.08582475,0.00027401367,0.00010960667,0.84150326,0.022605268,0.0457488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036009285,0.0000874956,0.0028860283,0.0043320907,0.00007036983,0.00083824014,0.078598775,0.0008087697,0.0003827607,0.59143925,0.320392,0.00012820083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034331053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030371925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052932918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02388559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029291859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27993935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125504071","doi":"10.1136/jme.2007.022467","title":"Evaluating solutions to sponsorship bias","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Data science; Computer science","score_opus":0.9394107759060534,"score_gpt":0.7136044306784155,"score_spread":0.22580634522763787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125504071","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.068513334,0.061275866,0.65231526,0.14868258,0.008062714,0.013419256,0.0011251476,0.00071686436,0.045888968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5662713,0.010439372,0.36981583,0.028505096,0.004437006,0.016516088,0.000535623,0.00028715978,0.003192515],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.1280901,0.750131,0.05179093,0.0136092175,0.053275507,0.0031032504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.035040163,0.84086543,0.068134636,0.027862575,0.026568715,0.0015285304],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.76976174,0.0030055272,0.006025609,0.014990853,0.005367202,0.015081118,0.00694109,0.015749782,0.00621158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9193342,0.002889434,0.0062356275,0.014787193,0.01799755,0.020995386,0.016254647,0.008231028,0.000610243],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021708792,0.00019637,0.046667762,0.011499276,0.008090049,0.0008292526,0.014319157,0.007077101,0.000230276,0.3710144,0.019654607,0.5182508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002925483,0.0015117503,0.012097844,0.024584273,0.0073275208,0.0016975616,0.0062420038,0.027294043,0.0025801493,0.8236755,0.08959746,0.0004663787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027772738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024243698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23023826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015057402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031976875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28392482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125619365","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2013-101343","title":"Questionable content of an industry-supported medical school lecture series: a case study","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Curriculum; Medical education; Conflict of interest; Public relations; Pharmaceutical industry; Process (computing); Political science; Business; Medicine; Psychology; Pedagogy; Law; Computer science; Pharmacology","score_opus":0.5923706838771461,"score_gpt":0.6128340212972897,"score_spread":0.020463337420143612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125619365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9694565,0.0017333837,0.003547859,0.010048457,0.00043557212,0.00026319048,0.000050328606,0.000055840814,0.0144088445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99009913,0.0011928111,0.0021288514,0.0014287076,0.0003219048,0.00006993388,0.000028245062,0.000027112235,0.0047033895],"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927691,0.0037644373,0.00033798077,0.00044278018,0.0013468509,0.0013389491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861281,0.0066967574,0.0024822303,0.0004789447,0.0006415792,0.0035724281],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035469583,0.0013159717,0.00061475515,0.0025440655,0.010221681,0.003487835,0.0025945283,0.0076862695,0.0050972425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019468209,0.0009819205,0.0014446987,0.0015123175,0.0040765656,0.0026317565,0.0037747964,0.0061586895,0.0009037688],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014999209,0.0017967339,0.026955063,0.00028401596,0.000046711884,0.890938,0.053588614,0.0006529018,0.00122605,0.004959227,0.00486801,0.014534656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046333134,0.0005906472,0.007896342,0.00039933436,0.000052281925,0.89584494,0.070083395,0.0019815199,0.0014970726,0.0012681709,0.020256663,0.000083303225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041357037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01069894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99231374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052444255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035259707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03805113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126030002","doi":"10.1136/jme.2010.036517","title":"Understanding preferences for disclosure of individual biomarker results among participants in a longitudinal birth cohort","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Child and Family Research Institute; Simon Fraser University","funders":"National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; National Cancer Institute","keywords":"Biomarker; Cohort; Medicine; Cohort study; Health professionals; Longitudinal study; Psychology; Clinical psychology; Family medicine; Demography; Health care; Internal medicine; Biology; Pathology","score_opus":0.25925020442303026,"score_gpt":0.3943164287414265,"score_spread":0.1350662243183962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126030002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99859256,0.00025883762,0.00011689433,0.0005272744,0.00001037795,0.000007441137,0.00007724004,0.0000012493335,0.00040807936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99921024,0.00018008317,0.00016252302,0.00021052409,0.0000070996402,0.00001262664,0.00005855629,9.488765e-7,0.00015739522],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766916,0.0013460743,0.000176927,0.000144911,0.0003905946,0.00027223572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99306047,0.002991874,0.0026642347,0.00024707217,0.0005413044,0.00049507077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063683963,0.00015182456,0.00017605284,0.00047840396,0.0006207967,0.001046167,0.0002791074,0.00071838876,0.0021725376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019506576,0.00016526671,0.0005294197,0.00031168968,0.00039071316,0.00086789497,0.0006448421,0.0007061865,0.0001473702],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002437522,0.0001278732,0.9737318,0.000053823,0.00010579842,0.0001893755,0.012584211,0.00007415811,0.00048178373,0.000110638124,0.000520836,0.011775937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002698378,0.0004923306,0.95044816,0.00019788853,0.00009133938,0.0006113477,0.044742174,0.00065139343,0.0003900744,0.0003089217,0.0019965228,0.000042963402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008939919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008204031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008939919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005698593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049799157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033679724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126701700","doi":"10.1136/jme.27.4.234","title":"Ethics, economics, and public financing of health care","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Hamilton Health Sciences; McMaster University Medical Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Public health; Distribution (mathematics); Work (physics); Variety (cybernetics); Health policy; Health law; International health; Business; Public economics; Public relations; Economics; Economic growth; Political science; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.17716202052361774,"score_gpt":0.3763455990587372,"score_spread":0.19918357853511948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126701700","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071422674,0.026923155,0.074610345,0.37929907,0.0009820856,0.00019583915,0.00019759587,0.000051839575,0.44631746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9633771,0.008350191,0.0053794766,0.010075434,0.0018341495,0.00028062658,0.00005798274,0.000025740777,0.010619181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834278,0.01175513,0.00040764236,0.0005328255,0.002587827,0.001288775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.971093,0.022474177,0.002334578,0.0013484713,0.0018462819,0.00090351125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012769816,0.00044305035,0.0006022838,0.0019859343,0.0024452435,0.0066520753,0.00076144264,0.005654134,0.002972827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03297547,0.00039049273,0.0003263303,0.0017372261,0.022289967,0.0059804264,0.0026777314,0.003840796,0.00024021031],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004095357,0.000010479485,0.00027682836,0.000013310756,0.0000039997176,0.00002096258,0.00009580629,0.000838374,0.000009615176,0.9959876,0.0010497395,0.0016891119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010572722,0.000005696076,0.0003483478,0.00006497637,0.0000019484312,0.000025549376,0.00016098592,0.0010025764,0.000026415817,0.989542,0.008806625,0.000004254966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034061442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025122603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012769816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008223628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007948075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06753409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127009860","doi":"10.1136/jme.2010.036335","title":"Complex calculations: ethical issues in involving at-risk healthy individuals in dementia research","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Wellcome Trust; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Fondation Brocher","keywords":"Dementia; Disease; Context (archaeology); Neuropathology; Vulnerability (computing); Medicine; Psychology; Psychiatry; Pathology; Computer security","score_opus":0.6737257898491676,"score_gpt":0.685518248990132,"score_spread":0.011792459140964384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127009860","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070525426,0.008953865,0.03345651,0.9150239,0.005234833,0.0007858231,0.000044926885,0.000073780735,0.029373812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2604192,0.0066598486,0.075126864,0.63405985,0.009124615,0.004208923,0.00006500413,0.00019372403,0.010141986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.31941313,0.60957474,0.017989503,0.012040848,0.03510492,0.005876849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2744759,0.6273047,0.018723167,0.036050756,0.026574846,0.016870657],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.49996597,0.0011157304,0.00329475,0.0017788039,0.015745208,0.024204617,0.0070721917,0.036009364,0.0042401515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.52007264,0.0018296987,0.0019040377,0.002148623,0.090661526,0.02600988,0.016357282,0.0448156,0.0032159141],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024359621,0.00018936371,0.0019452634,0.00064097956,0.00011979762,0.0011427562,0.055906005,0.00065245957,0.00044473173,0.800956,0.085653916,0.052105136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018113492,0.00030416893,0.0012449597,0.0030016836,0.00006286814,0.0020081967,0.016938819,0.0016534524,0.00046191606,0.74956125,0.22438829,0.00019331463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030319083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046055457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9639906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009875369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039951324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61663103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127275313","doi":"10.1136/jme.27.6.370","title":"Disability and difference: balancing social and physical constructions: Figure 1:","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Neonatal and fetal brain pathology","field":"Medicine","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hospital for Sick Children","funders":"Hospital for Sick Children; Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Splenium; Corpus callosum; Internal capsule; Diffusion MRI; Medicine; White matter; Meta-analysis; MEDLINE; Pediatrics; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Magnetic resonance imaging; Pathology; Radiology; Biology","score_opus":0.09129007158437237,"score_gpt":0.42560087139270286,"score_spread":0.3343107998083305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127275313","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065979925,0.75372297,0.011090722,0.10567954,0.0022447286,0.00004764427,0.000034727156,0.00004174908,0.12053991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31299016,0.61661756,0.011502047,0.031954356,0.0028781127,0.00016968879,0.00008619509,0.00003719124,0.023764748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99708396,0.0017083262,0.000105361454,0.00022217636,0.00074841717,0.00013178462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882644,0.00077343313,0.000120811885,0.00005133746,0.00016874823,0.00005914515],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022583136,0.00052489695,0.00090004224,0.0019488093,0.0014280812,0.0037319863,0.00111529,0.004386512,0.002863867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025066398,0.00022453065,0.00032312982,0.002172821,0.016063161,0.0066542435,0.00276194,0.0030939376,0.0009032776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040399816,0.000027636173,0.0005726029,0.0025013655,0.000021564823,0.0005641665,0.010213404,0.00019219986,0.0004928681,0.7384028,0.019549683,0.22742133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001647107,0.00006302755,0.002395873,0.0037669444,0.00002376779,0.003665196,0.014452477,0.00020518182,0.0003421679,0.35912016,0.6159103,0.00003845793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032059036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004300321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9971361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002383855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031892145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017296195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127586878","doi":"10.1136/jme.2010.039008","title":"Moral experience: a framework for bioethics research","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; McGill University Health Centre; Université de Montréal","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Bioethics; Engineering ethics; Data science; Environmental ethics; Psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.8095381309831641,"score_gpt":0.7185982289166477,"score_spread":0.09093990206651636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127586878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03727156,0.03912159,0.31955782,0.15316303,0.0023954746,0.0008104898,0.00044567906,0.00021133285,0.44702303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8892203,0.010964368,0.079283886,0.0078437235,0.0010257184,0.002159637,0.0002597162,0.00020626657,0.009036442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96841365,0.02617333,0.0008794084,0.0015989637,0.0018026279,0.0011319487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795116,0.014090357,0.001265843,0.0018020708,0.0015828109,0.0017472641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023368148,0.0012640625,0.0014107435,0.0070664613,0.009796445,0.026063737,0.0056032254,0.00847036,0.005147939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018010736,0.0006505124,0.0011117767,0.006621735,0.109744154,0.030668467,0.013087157,0.011072807,0.00086195004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040819305,0.0000107270225,0.000114081515,0.000070735856,0.0000026611274,0.000044523204,0.022511633,0.00009998289,0.000037501097,0.9746732,0.00047013277,0.0019607407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010447003,0.000019418188,0.00019496169,0.00050489366,0.000004849767,0.00013015505,0.031421576,0.00047553543,0.000050019138,0.922951,0.044218697,0.000018620725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004695595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022710208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026063737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0126602575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009760643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12358409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128372335","doi":"10.1136/jme.2009.030460","title":"Expectations regarding cognitive enhancement create substantial challenges","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Clinical Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Warrant; Cognition; Neuroethics; Engineering ethics; Consumption (sociology); Psychology; Data science; Computer science; Business; Neuroscience; Sociology; Social science; Engineering","score_opus":0.2017068309152262,"score_gpt":0.4278642752484084,"score_spread":0.22615744433318222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128372335","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059947865,0.0058955927,0.0057275197,0.9293111,0.0015908479,0.000036015757,0.0000389356,0.000037564707,0.051367573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43604016,0.008322694,0.007913378,0.5330885,0.0058279713,0.0003498896,0.0000713183,0.00013750805,0.008248587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9571773,0.023083286,0.001952065,0.0029460152,0.0130813895,0.0017599281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86213356,0.11014712,0.0046382416,0.003535082,0.013923905,0.005622178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06993288,0.0005232103,0.0008266273,0.00079957827,0.0037234523,0.008708963,0.002798145,0.014668982,0.0065296195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12011371,0.0002915568,0.00078162935,0.00048342493,0.026608609,0.010613379,0.0061539775,0.017885773,0.0018969101],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011870286,0.00015281075,0.0013102602,0.00048203848,0.00003094878,0.0003377237,0.007820378,0.0004459086,0.0005567557,0.86480737,0.06261054,0.06132652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006810191,0.00015372504,0.0016683904,0.001210027,0.00002127523,0.0004967651,0.0063824146,0.0005356814,0.0006009657,0.75806576,0.23072425,0.000072672825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025505605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00208682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06993288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051356577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007555557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36984485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128372426","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2014-102458","title":"Treatment-resistant major depressive disorder and assisted dying","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Depression (economics); Psychiatry; Medicine; Major depressive disorder; Treatment-resistant depression; Assisted suicide; Depressive symptoms; Resistance (ecology); Psychology; Anxiety","score_opus":0.24582432710999894,"score_gpt":0.5381148908575125,"score_spread":0.2922905637475136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128372426","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006328136,0.9993531,0.000011521161,0.00020217018,0.00004103155,0.0000019058626,0.0000023257976,6.059127e-7,0.00032410637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014861239,0.9981225,0.000035425826,0.00019382681,0.000060886403,0.000004207412,0.0000061784885,3.060769e-7,0.00009049314],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944514,0.00024301166,0.00008894251,0.00004396855,0.00014790444,0.000031047315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802065,0.0013684981,0.00034882108,0.000029494227,0.0001628196,0.00006972218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010314285,0.00041508343,0.0011119742,0.0015367664,0.00039831843,0.0012044556,0.00074988435,0.0013313999,0.003176268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038618406,0.00021381944,0.00078705326,0.002226335,0.0009202654,0.0010364145,0.0007045705,0.0016500964,0.0004196843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078708006,0.00008554354,0.00074167544,0.062951006,0.00038033072,0.00021120925,0.00022709114,0.00015562012,0.00011082198,0.0076832664,0.026353536,0.9010212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014209226,0.00018461625,0.008756773,0.15520842,0.0014012494,0.0071811187,0.00091644394,0.00014405281,0.00021730406,0.011282762,0.81450814,0.000057057703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022811333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005060452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003176268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008192335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025056824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01062566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128558490","doi":"10.1136/jme.2009.031609","title":"Children in health research: a matter of trust","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Children's Rights and Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Qualitative research; Perception; Grounded theory; Psychology; Focus group; Developmental psychology; Medicine; Social psychology; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.2347070423009294,"score_gpt":0.5205682558819426,"score_spread":0.28586121358101313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128558490","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7976533,0.009911672,0.017783318,0.10316621,0.00046518468,0.00032505055,0.00013098057,0.0000879987,0.07047628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99618053,0.00082584005,0.0009808056,0.0012777438,0.000028644363,0.00003304151,0.0000098348355,0.000009905762,0.00065371295],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.87068295,0.095340125,0.0058706896,0.0036088785,0.017444449,0.0070529548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81947273,0.11742509,0.027915433,0.007982292,0.0113857705,0.015818741],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06129745,0.00029050687,0.0007559641,0.0016674529,0.0127422,0.011327364,0.0012551108,0.0024940441,0.002364911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09690423,0.00065991236,0.0004739467,0.0016718872,0.04846306,0.0069893147,0.010758614,0.006517545,0.00015591067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060174476,0.00003689417,0.029730804,0.00028168014,0.000054533793,0.0010719816,0.9022129,0.00014600069,0.00063104427,0.04479974,0.0021759071,0.018798212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052937376,0.00024639154,0.042174604,0.0024792613,0.00012613778,0.002566864,0.7579923,0.00040828477,0.0009513398,0.038638704,0.15415713,0.00020607114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09459928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055422314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99750596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024107302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04308325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32417578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129225996","doi":"10.1136/jme.28.3.170","title":"Neuromuscular blockers—a means of palliation?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Anesthesia and Sedative Agents","field":"Medicine","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Sedation; Intensive care medicine; Respiratory distress; Distress; Respiratory failure; Anesthesia; Psychology","score_opus":0.09181111426045808,"score_gpt":0.3594016078649019,"score_spread":0.2675904936044438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129225996","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039915217,0.0053937035,0.000092981594,0.9849583,0.0050316313,0.0000050124727,0.000005968546,0.000010034602,0.0041033756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009256277,0.0066086496,0.00034148805,0.94450694,0.030705113,0.000030208983,0.000009444188,0.00001164629,0.00853028],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970214,0.0011490685,0.00034916506,0.00022251313,0.00096237997,0.00029543947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99623555,0.0019763468,0.00042329342,0.00014474004,0.00053605094,0.0006840808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023326932,0.00068127917,0.0009226605,0.000561219,0.002969482,0.0025844038,0.001314046,0.047473352,0.004433359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0159714,0.00045470046,0.0009983054,0.00050952303,0.0036173281,0.006242197,0.001525933,0.02848157,0.0032640207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009676123,0.00012304678,0.0013415216,0.0002628104,0.000027614371,0.013103392,0.000821844,0.00014983243,0.00058207754,0.022077372,0.9234344,0.037979234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012121064,0.00013747597,0.0009763565,0.000927786,0.000025283734,0.025507156,0.00091404625,0.00030385525,0.00019852749,0.02253806,0.9483126,0.00003767668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017665414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004173222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047473352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002540988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025557715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018436253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129438997","doi":"10.1136/jme.2010.042002","title":"Informed consent for clinical trials of deep brain stimulation in psychiatric disease: challenges and implications for trial design: Table 1","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Neurological disorders and treatments","field":"Medicine","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto General Hospital; Toronto Western Hospital; University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Deep brain stimulation; Clinical trial; Informed consent; Context (archaeology); Psychiatry; Medicine; Population; Voluntariness; Disease; Psychology; Alternative medicine; Pathology","score_opus":0.633094903216267,"score_gpt":0.5565160375990146,"score_spread":0.07657886561725247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129438997","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005230757,0.03582669,0.24977489,0.48885226,0.021148736,0.06536469,0.002429938,0.0012278572,0.13014421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.061948877,0.035674866,0.4911336,0.2203324,0.01368934,0.14747782,0.0026105607,0.0007452709,0.026387304],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.48782334,0.42027092,0.054659598,0.0055904845,0.028252646,0.0034030566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.38691282,0.48649365,0.024097422,0.04416789,0.047001425,0.011326728],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3786827,0.0015616717,0.0036116713,0.0027423745,0.0042631505,0.012183546,0.0058475095,0.022458512,0.014487435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4182401,0.0018688259,0.002317374,0.0035387606,0.012453646,0.008115937,0.00546831,0.017924562,0.009486568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010281111,0.00021049159,0.0017975966,0.00861056,0.0002505241,0.002540842,0.0045151766,0.0014186593,0.0014029568,0.23317209,0.33139217,0.41366082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012654408,0.00081091654,0.0031372004,0.031088937,0.0002382096,0.005800408,0.0020877298,0.0039224415,0.0014983977,0.20393714,0.7458954,0.0003178675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011106991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021240604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62131727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048275036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041332368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7661948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129750793","doi":"10.1136/jme.2006.018903","title":"Rights, responsibilities and NICE: a rejoinder to Harris","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Work & Health","funders":"","keywords":"Nice; Excellence; Quality-adjusted life year; Actuarial science; Health care rationing; Health care; Outcome (game theory); Inference; Cost effectiveness; Medicine; Operations research; Psychology; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Law; Risk analysis (engineering); Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.4641587539012373,"score_gpt":0.5316572827084718,"score_spread":0.0674985288072345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129750793","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022466073,0.0013363084,0.0002671887,0.9914829,0.005161061,0.00000636845,0.000009783558,0.00001487083,0.001496738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0060246047,0.00068949256,0.00055517745,0.982625,0.0071636667,0.000044503933,0.000008291351,0.000042858323,0.0028463537],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9542212,0.018369423,0.004314939,0.0053745722,0.013769596,0.0039503034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8925346,0.080698624,0.0029756895,0.004214764,0.012079066,0.0074972347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05090108,0.001241863,0.0034512007,0.0012881916,0.007892795,0.01545113,0.0062855883,0.09915876,0.0046476484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12529026,0.0017401767,0.0026976627,0.0015642451,0.04259959,0.020142674,0.010693334,0.10858438,0.0024130014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066877335,0.00002893532,0.00017607921,0.00010135718,0.00002470809,0.00034727587,0.0016531028,0.00012477899,0.00009201056,0.20532234,0.7841814,0.007881106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000111499685,0.00006772408,0.00040223752,0.0006405606,0.0000354896,0.000523139,0.0023720192,0.00034965068,0.0001500471,0.13283785,0.862342,0.00016781257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015787361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018736087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09915876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008504328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016760884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2691939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129751575","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2013-101765","title":"Implementation of a consent for chart review and contact and its impact in one clinical centre","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Chart; Medicine; Confidentiality; Family medicine; Patient Consent; Pediatrics; Alternative medicine; Computer science; Pathology","score_opus":0.6954082525909889,"score_gpt":0.7188436600817371,"score_spread":0.023435407490748128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129751575","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73257375,0.0031575884,0.12551962,0.04039397,0.0013816112,0.05242545,0.00049564935,0.0011993349,0.04285298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8922444,0.00069197244,0.09268441,0.003867668,0.0003835082,0.008410173,0.00015366676,0.00011402469,0.0014501433],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.47906366,0.4503517,0.027216084,0.009372416,0.027016187,0.0069799866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3771149,0.36858484,0.08999646,0.084400676,0.049186077,0.030716946],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.30934116,0.00068161625,0.0008066353,0.0026207268,0.0069759972,0.008402546,0.0033678238,0.0030610296,0.003969571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.39460567,0.0010080179,0.00092853437,0.002244372,0.006691643,0.006138357,0.012107872,0.004580845,0.0010661889],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023707487,0.0055774106,0.17655697,0.0028890884,0.00019875786,0.009489792,0.16354722,0.0021836495,0.0064381277,0.013356818,0.021389581,0.5960019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028883843,0.030807339,0.43150154,0.01564411,0.0005763111,0.030513369,0.21927796,0.015603666,0.023690578,0.013205372,0.21427897,0.0020124847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039042835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067611253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30934116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008397386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047239453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8517053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129896353","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2012-100903","title":"Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of a family booklet on comfort care in dementia: sensitive topics revised before implementation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Palliative care; Dementia; Adaptation (eye); Typology; Psychology; Nursing; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.24612833781069438,"score_gpt":0.527552916957521,"score_spread":0.28142457914682667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129896353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62991405,0.0016881463,0.13167801,0.040927105,0.010549178,0.07445771,0.009074023,0.0024589945,0.09925286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41895828,0.0037804397,0.4195559,0.011174877,0.0012318385,0.08756144,0.005665584,0.000928475,0.05114313],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930628,0.004724174,0.0008362916,0.0003245555,0.00070005044,0.00035222137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97168046,0.016489053,0.0011105613,0.0024143858,0.007329062,0.0009764481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01537725,0.00073169824,0.00049063965,0.0009228772,0.0016632803,0.0013380392,0.0010172215,0.00139239,0.013850928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037990697,0.00044023304,0.00061935233,0.0008376681,0.0015612764,0.0013785397,0.002112051,0.0028381732,0.0036751498],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010582481,0.0025746545,0.0072677694,0.00629902,0.00003118645,0.0056514954,0.22170016,0.0017010296,0.013932813,0.006870828,0.18785295,0.5450599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008866793,0.0023368462,0.04035266,0.0068620984,0.00008306699,0.003156437,0.07260617,0.0021344926,0.015077487,0.0072019077,0.84892976,0.0003724109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025760003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003981835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01537725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026003048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00763471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08132368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130064529","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2013-101572","title":"Consensus standards for introductory e-learning courses in human participants research ethics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Radiology practices and education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Biotika; University of Ottawa","funders":"Fogarty International Center","keywords":"Medical education; Research ethics; Ethical standards; Process (computing); Engineering ethics; Psychology; Computer science; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.3592936525969912,"score_gpt":0.5873955597745074,"score_spread":0.22810190717751622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130064529","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039621152,0.012188785,0.6818751,0.101600654,0.016800478,0.034764223,0.0016171873,0.002051929,0.109480485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.101180784,0.0032296302,0.84427786,0.009385253,0.00085901417,0.029882845,0.002275001,0.0005806087,0.008329039],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.5172911,0.23923473,0.13041326,0.010975773,0.092781596,0.00930353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.19025724,0.3687611,0.029010324,0.066674344,0.33249477,0.012802363],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.5413881,0.0012768212,0.0027308771,0.010479658,0.008416232,0.011357088,0.011553188,0.014357185,0.0040851063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.60230243,0.0024774228,0.006344832,0.006714067,0.008626955,0.006479401,0.014795545,0.023994466,0.0034747303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051746174,0.0014889991,0.0154316,0.013718699,0.0005699646,0.0012387605,0.043021247,0.0064452514,0.0073883403,0.32776412,0.13268921,0.44972634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005633339,0.0010502134,0.02694467,0.030170148,0.00049165863,0.0021216006,0.02025697,0.010705701,0.010213952,0.2351276,0.66160226,0.000751821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052129226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062906323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5413881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01345799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.071525395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5655502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131882480","doi":"10.1136/jme.2004.010629","title":"Informing research participants of research results: analysis of Canadian university based research ethics board policies","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Bioethics Society; Izaak Walton Killam Health Centre; Dalhousie University","funders":"IWK Health Centre; Dalhousie University","keywords":"Research ethics; Statement (logic); Human research; Ethics committee; Inclusion (mineral); Ethical issues; Public relations; Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Engineering ethics; Law; Public administration; Social psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.8928774793116917,"score_gpt":0.701927032105675,"score_spread":0.19095044720601673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131882480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8620923,0.005289082,0.0071949065,0.03693496,0.00023115026,0.005459685,0.00314963,0.00010360586,0.079544686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885443,0.0014006766,0.0040642726,0.0018924739,0.000041162653,0.0009219619,0.0005145001,0.000048645943,0.002572059],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.76420045,0.102537744,0.01740029,0.0074173026,0.089071624,0.01937248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3859579,0.33391732,0.08787698,0.015919806,0.15492536,0.021402633],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.18089683,0.00044100313,0.0008037623,0.010588828,0.014573817,0.009627144,0.0033844877,0.002142245,0.004247466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.45957813,0.00069274,0.00078277313,0.017771898,0.0073357257,0.003591363,0.0056615216,0.0034265188,0.00032340843],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058692734,0.00022548962,0.5771266,0.0021627513,0.00019624554,0.0005808772,0.22854517,0.0007455574,0.00064114894,0.052269727,0.02806838,0.10885109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060749782,0.000090112095,0.73414075,0.0025461244,0.00013111257,0.00022596888,0.17351755,0.0025173398,0.00052656117,0.004495868,0.08155292,0.00019491164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8682988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8645324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99785775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14763415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32523108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98862356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132587765","doi":"10.1136/jme.2010.036715","title":"Developing registries of volunteers: key principles to manage issues regarding personal information protection: Figure 1","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; McGill University","funders":"Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec","keywords":"Confidentiality; Normative; Key (lock); Task (project management); Internet privacy; Computer science; Computer security; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.4183001632165106,"score_gpt":0.5433828386533576,"score_spread":0.12508267543684698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132587765","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006462655,0.0018844124,0.56912667,0.21849066,0.0015713705,0.009425756,0.00040506048,0.0010030359,0.19163047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08661606,0.0019926338,0.8291149,0.026841588,0.00060579093,0.0059746383,0.00036141308,0.0002475846,0.04824543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8714825,0.080858566,0.0124415485,0.0039356872,0.026333267,0.004948486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87902015,0.0529883,0.0076451614,0.01565399,0.035646353,0.009045995],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1651376,0.00074198376,0.0008547312,0.0026191554,0.009790521,0.018372983,0.004604058,0.015552763,0.004170991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.100958295,0.002054376,0.0012828674,0.0020511348,0.022731777,0.01503452,0.010874063,0.013794754,0.005138502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019912803,0.00008423417,0.0011492566,0.0003200352,0.000016040873,0.0002942892,0.015068727,0.00054276164,0.0006494395,0.8870454,0.054748807,0.04006108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053085645,0.00012046587,0.001648164,0.0013578415,0.000028080953,0.0011483084,0.0053069303,0.0010024641,0.0012580539,0.2200069,0.7679137,0.00015601891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015826404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022025859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98444724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0093016075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.074794486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87334156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132840591","doi":"10.1136/jme.2006.017038","title":"Withholding and withdrawing life support in critical care settings: ethical issues concerning consent","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Bioethics; Informed consent; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Psychological intervention; Intervention (counseling); Life support; Social psychology; Medicine; Nursing; Law; Political science; Psychiatry; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.5005070038367924,"score_gpt":0.6129180606156864,"score_spread":0.11241105677889407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132840591","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01435351,0.057531364,0.017308056,0.86852205,0.0039835838,0.000182926,0.000025541582,0.000041856467,0.038051154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5621844,0.074588396,0.032423634,0.31067353,0.010605823,0.00085577345,0.000059997354,0.00013792647,0.008470542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.7521225,0.21996991,0.009191367,0.0028150603,0.012653688,0.0032473998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6136431,0.35501224,0.009939538,0.008520089,0.006577492,0.006307627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16716333,0.00065854867,0.0013189851,0.0012330835,0.008461235,0.013636637,0.0029708743,0.019084388,0.0027235032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28142983,0.0005723766,0.0009814557,0.0014879771,0.0749246,0.01680601,0.013123075,0.027635794,0.00087240624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010876776,0.00009044845,0.0017665664,0.0013296729,0.000037022954,0.0051853685,0.106137544,0.00045314472,0.0004633666,0.73274505,0.03556296,0.116120145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006426034,0.00013128162,0.0014180025,0.010428529,0.000027222415,0.010247369,0.047819823,0.00063431147,0.00049644517,0.72886205,0.1997331,0.00013759312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002448175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003422891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16716333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057867803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022861488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8840547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134076687","doi":"10.1136/jme.2006.019406","title":"Beyond informed consent: the therapeutic misconception and trust","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Confusion; Focus (optics); Psychology; Empirical research; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Epistemology; Pathology","score_opus":0.5748861720246976,"score_gpt":0.5940177070717441,"score_spread":0.019131535047046455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134076687","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022552323,0.022837065,0.111479804,0.7803847,0.0022063607,0.00021595781,0.000049371916,0.00008862502,0.060185757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85848325,0.0075954604,0.032232676,0.095166035,0.0026198241,0.00053615705,0.000034456316,0.00010541632,0.0032267654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6298574,0.30694237,0.014109918,0.011834716,0.03199584,0.005259694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.46654615,0.46075872,0.02395827,0.03188215,0.0125448825,0.0043098987],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.28419334,0.0010764238,0.0024879682,0.0032400184,0.010550788,0.018401183,0.0057648337,0.030134168,0.002066584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.33208615,0.0012809541,0.0016572049,0.0031979627,0.21587744,0.03691685,0.014543976,0.034389008,0.00065223937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027293729,0.000013758182,0.00039580057,0.00013624303,0.000024946108,0.00030313357,0.018185958,0.00019446893,0.000087928966,0.9713425,0.0020849248,0.0072030136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031373234,0.000029426594,0.00015929725,0.0005288315,0.000017404578,0.00070587866,0.0029162557,0.00050566375,0.00021252004,0.9787571,0.016091716,0.000044532604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00497566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025859752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96986586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013562635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022160275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8827171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134896416","doi":"10.1136/jme.2009.032466","title":"Off-trial access to experimental cancer agents for the terminally ill: balancing the needs of individuals and society","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Clinical trial; Medicine; Cancer; Terminal cancer; Drug development; Cancer drugs; Research ethics; Intensive care medicine; Drug; Psychiatry; Pathology; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.4570225426018613,"score_gpt":0.639356942577845,"score_spread":0.18233439997598372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134896416","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.081080586,0.009143073,0.013174032,0.830767,0.0009557504,0.0001151683,0.000034478537,0.000030638836,0.06469935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7994128,0.010510161,0.010435618,0.1665938,0.0031439129,0.0003521178,0.00005831379,0.00004503309,0.0094481865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9105672,0.07552132,0.002507844,0.0015324873,0.007082322,0.0027886946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81961215,0.13273102,0.01233261,0.011178297,0.007068702,0.017077327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07385867,0.00023983225,0.000800606,0.0006893967,0.00503144,0.008324713,0.0016095923,0.008435681,0.004362152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12538883,0.000337009,0.00047434986,0.00060496735,0.02100594,0.00808781,0.009375374,0.0076644826,0.00095386425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005944051,0.00047282755,0.01499125,0.00055158284,0.00008027323,0.00218927,0.03376491,0.0008430357,0.002077378,0.68871933,0.06534492,0.19037083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023350517,0.0007059333,0.009280466,0.0022630426,0.000055096316,0.0045413263,0.02181456,0.0013098773,0.001257542,0.6688455,0.28957602,0.000117140546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068803475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012508996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07385867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024177157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013448472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39060664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135451924","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2012-100793","title":"A child born with Edward's syndrome: the legal and moral duty to accede to the request for parentage determination","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Regent College","funders":"","keywords":"Suspect; Duty; Test (biology); Obligation; Subject (documents); Reproduction; Genetic testing; Medicine; Law; Moral obligation; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Genetics; Biology","score_opus":0.04516538986021226,"score_gpt":0.3963196126767226,"score_spread":0.3511542228165103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135451924","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38626498,0.003683248,0.013171193,0.5300207,0.0017244426,0.00012780228,0.000061746476,0.000065192275,0.06488073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92889345,0.002209899,0.012817554,0.04748392,0.0006323001,0.00006959876,0.00001758474,0.000023380528,0.007852389],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957854,0.0024904867,0.0002184651,0.00031818697,0.00055430166,0.0006331899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99387145,0.004368901,0.0007124373,0.00017100778,0.00023313393,0.00064307515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004462688,0.000310466,0.00048644803,0.00041400638,0.005243453,0.0023980776,0.0007832596,0.014474689,0.001676141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0145870475,0.00033433532,0.00054432196,0.00025572028,0.009657215,0.002193427,0.0035015745,0.008652829,0.0003204125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018302827,0.00014558868,0.016869899,0.0001556661,0.000041276453,0.3996803,0.057140987,0.00101561,0.003294077,0.48391688,0.020163234,0.017393507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009737327,0.00044985884,0.008061819,0.0010860882,0.00009438271,0.6157583,0.06724935,0.0035821078,0.0027432786,0.17009066,0.13051362,0.0002732417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004415705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007439702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014474689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020756135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00483649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023601234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136409336","doi":"10.1136/jme.2011.043042","title":"From genomic databases to translation: a call to action","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Translation (biology); Action (physics); Data sharing; Data science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Medicine; Biology; Genetics; Pathology","score_opus":0.14110658311280802,"score_gpt":0.3823597104208603,"score_spread":0.2412531273080523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136409336","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002974644,0.0019305487,0.0033954754,0.9893818,0.0024995145,0.00002349185,0.000028865006,0.00007242627,0.0023703573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05381338,0.013375737,0.047585145,0.85726124,0.018961206,0.0004633258,0.00043486056,0.00056753407,0.007537584],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.72128105,0.19533393,0.017061785,0.010108351,0.0447301,0.011484812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.31574547,0.5573205,0.013283932,0.039758857,0.04514303,0.028748184],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.31144348,0.0021070032,0.004446697,0.006731908,0.0132542355,0.042433232,0.01294476,0.07202757,0.021179512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3601024,0.0018063344,0.0033837173,0.0074265907,0.06785984,0.0714694,0.037841596,0.07175799,0.0077509],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020465611,0.0002946063,0.0008192848,0.001180429,0.00008468279,0.00093314453,0.015478394,0.0007692466,0.0005896735,0.41641,0.47370294,0.08953301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012574546,0.00008043412,0.0005879096,0.0026249653,0.000029388751,0.0006623783,0.020908,0.0011438058,0.0002868805,0.5336375,0.4397617,0.00015126556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0078069605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043628253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31144348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014345995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07348556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84911275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137034258","doi":"10.1136/jme.2003.005702","title":"Biomedical conflicts of interest: a defence of the sequestration thesis—learning from the cases of Nancy Olivieri and David Healy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":154,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Political science; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Management; Economics; Engineering; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.7297793189986983,"score_gpt":0.601639539662305,"score_spread":0.1281397793363933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137034258","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002951431,0.004314462,0.0023500307,0.96109486,0.002520841,0.000019608919,0.000004972823,0.000012633778,0.026731137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22722527,0.0069704885,0.005021985,0.71368545,0.011120047,0.00036628975,0.000017798642,0.00007399422,0.035518635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96220523,0.022441974,0.0009766527,0.0031942686,0.008797754,0.002384045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9196085,0.0640197,0.004211864,0.0032219358,0.0057429085,0.0031952092],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047437422,0.00067332626,0.0012162136,0.0012382811,0.012784439,0.013475951,0.004855548,0.035698596,0.0027609132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09367104,0.00054760085,0.00067848206,0.0010159512,0.062890805,0.018049972,0.010579789,0.039166503,0.00081144366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013216868,0.000012703896,0.00019706647,0.000062987194,0.000009047421,0.0006014876,0.011891773,0.00012476734,0.00008166142,0.83333313,0.14589794,0.007774091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003567114,0.000028024591,0.00021394317,0.00060637464,0.0000132317455,0.0012953564,0.009739888,0.00060147024,0.00029007831,0.32777336,0.65935767,0.00004486584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00821625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00815344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9643014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073988107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013771433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.250876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138473831","doi":"10.1136/jme.2005.012807","title":"Review of a mock research protocol in functional neuroimaging by Canadian research ethics boards","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Protocol (science); Research ethics; Mandate; Neuroimaging; Computer science; Interpretation (philosophy); Engineering ethics; Psychology; Medicine; Psychiatry; Alternative medicine; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.7251247044649617,"score_gpt":0.6418003750010972,"score_spread":0.08332432946386448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138473831","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067908905,0.51252615,0.12654814,0.07322079,0.01247583,0.09710117,0.0007067668,0.00063759723,0.10887473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37807536,0.20338991,0.2654562,0.02429772,0.0023580731,0.08626642,0.0012643373,0.00026368335,0.038628332],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.6678358,0.25781408,0.021309325,0.005221254,0.04342458,0.004394997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6722075,0.15978758,0.02905517,0.017874042,0.11510263,0.005973157],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.26266623,0.00089581707,0.0013944475,0.0045917444,0.005488236,0.002974075,0.005056178,0.004357741,0.0025790746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3693355,0.0008510926,0.00074275554,0.00468565,0.005060978,0.002625089,0.00405116,0.0027580014,0.0014548863],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058087916,0.00022075888,0.004088358,0.018962312,0.00013786626,0.0012987014,0.023620984,0.0011097803,0.0038782614,0.027795143,0.08882823,0.82947874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004524939,0.0004906363,0.01697196,0.025962315,0.0001766186,0.001885028,0.008510112,0.00092188746,0.003776984,0.0058301548,0.9347961,0.00022571345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08164754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16045007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99564224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023792457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11850689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90926385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138988016","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2012-100746","title":"Reporting of patient consent in healthcare cluster randomised trials is associated with the type of study interventions and publication characteristics","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Ottawa Hospital; University of Calgary","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Informed consent; Psychological intervention; Family medicine; Medicine; Research ethics; Cluster (spacecraft); CRTS; Health care; MEDLINE; Alternative medicine; Nursing; Psychiatry; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.7520368712069652,"score_gpt":0.6595263201889944,"score_spread":0.09251055101797079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138988016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75018734,0.0763017,0.111144714,0.021443723,0.0025068047,0.021462895,0.006396028,0.00064562,0.009911173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9234116,0.0045562265,0.052272357,0.0027275968,0.0005638471,0.014763561,0.0010672456,0.00019920386,0.00043849283],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.10789237,0.65389776,0.19271092,0.011606653,0.0323557,0.0015366091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.021253657,0.73567384,0.17092942,0.05708326,0.014148516,0.000911251],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_broad"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.67312765,0.0009339854,0.0029819359,0.007027214,0.002115639,0.0062983423,0.0029363572,0.0029557997,0.0021124743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.87946063,0.0017204285,0.0045951265,0.012926373,0.005281136,0.0058855223,0.00565792,0.0021481826,0.00042129666],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.022915138,0.00047348734,0.67893606,0.044014063,0.021123016,0.00050456857,0.029021032,0.0036577082,0.0022475102,0.0068181525,0.008801239,0.18148804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009831505,0.008916329,0.8286099,0.045194093,0.01472527,0.0027804587,0.00974961,0.009717298,0.011047466,0.026223872,0.03189636,0.0013078698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017161171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023163985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99701804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041603865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010809518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40309185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139335589","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2012-101129","title":"Is it ethical to invite compatible pairs to participate in exchange programmes?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Disadvantage; Distributive justice; Transplantation; Equity (law); Donation; Economic Justice; Medicine; Organ donation; Kidney donation; Affect (linguistics); Kidney transplantation; Psychology; Political science; Internal medicine; Law","score_opus":0.14535412821692775,"score_gpt":0.4417051809426528,"score_spread":0.29635105272572504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139335589","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03188762,0.009634346,0.007672831,0.8901562,0.0043175668,0.00008206103,0.000030807183,0.000023231561,0.05619533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5452857,0.010557817,0.008452358,0.42165032,0.0043824166,0.00029647187,0.00004156638,0.00006902325,0.0092642475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9202094,0.06513704,0.002096257,0.0021903566,0.006538024,0.003828947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9142684,0.060060043,0.006964938,0.0034981149,0.0053608636,0.009847686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05168114,0.00024597146,0.0006161401,0.00043821495,0.005953298,0.009614913,0.0016916728,0.01045294,0.0042820554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09682558,0.00032521223,0.0004781065,0.0007075786,0.023788353,0.009731766,0.0071585514,0.011150657,0.0009857212],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016813629,0.0002853477,0.011069341,0.0006841676,0.000050897765,0.0015527102,0.034477144,0.00036891078,0.0006443208,0.76700246,0.061653446,0.12204312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015268671,0.0003416232,0.007866942,0.0043139285,0.00006007035,0.005155802,0.07397333,0.00084437325,0.0007948995,0.45436686,0.45197585,0.00015364465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015189961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026421617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05168114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002712798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01118296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2733193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139704368","doi":"10.1136/jme.2008.026351","title":"Just compassion: implications for the ethics of the scarcity paradigm in clinical healthcare provision","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Clinical Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Compassion; Rationing; Economic Justice; Scarcity; Health care; Distributive justice; Vulnerability (computing); Virtue; Dilemma; Sociology; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Public relations; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Economics","score_opus":0.48851720182340796,"score_gpt":0.6628437205305475,"score_spread":0.17432651870713955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139704368","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019162642,0.009728909,0.033591744,0.7642946,0.0022654878,0.00009977685,0.000015978812,0.000036308986,0.1708045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85814404,0.004028208,0.015778475,0.10645442,0.0031218072,0.0004942539,0.000014211978,0.00005951461,0.011904988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96669275,0.02692366,0.0008002764,0.0010918085,0.0030719712,0.0014195611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9576677,0.0347073,0.0018714945,0.001392773,0.002036223,0.0023245902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026301581,0.00048332682,0.0007376106,0.0013220777,0.0098539535,0.013157337,0.0023406658,0.016192583,0.0021689455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034794994,0.00039393967,0.0006243682,0.001162406,0.124541655,0.013981285,0.011813683,0.013078797,0.00041557878],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000600829,0.000012232843,0.000080223756,0.000024225466,0.0000014802454,0.00009737292,0.006619004,0.00007649619,0.000021822567,0.9894767,0.0019126583,0.0016716616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018711913,0.000015767595,0.000121147845,0.00014982949,0.0000019059285,0.00017365033,0.006283869,0.0002684583,0.00003660269,0.9677283,0.025191313,0.0000103906605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021994798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022074464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026301581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009185427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012568315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13909769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139924880","doi":"10.1136/jme.2006.016444","title":"Refuting the net risks test: a response to Wendler and Miller’s “Assessing research risks systematically”","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Harm; Clinical equipoise; Miller; Research ethics; Test (biology); Psychological intervention; Risk analysis (engineering); Component (thermodynamics); Engineering ethics; Duty; Clinical trial; Psychology; Medicine; Actuarial science; Political science; Business; Law; Social psychology; Engineering; Biology; Pathology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.835670536432955,"score_gpt":0.7275577684054344,"score_spread":0.10811276802752057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139924880","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040159505,0.00059230695,0.00071211986,0.9935267,0.0039657746,0.00001413175,0.000014586919,0.00001685168,0.0007559894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006356803,0.0003789749,0.001834291,0.9858374,0.004653902,0.000074457705,0.000008502489,0.000027705222,0.0008279108],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8768148,0.0748622,0.00985021,0.00959703,0.025697323,0.0031784496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.67535865,0.27725568,0.0074202633,0.0048625837,0.029006353,0.006096505],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10748965,0.0015143688,0.0023771634,0.0019239986,0.008641812,0.009674158,0.0073809405,0.0819503,0.0036170857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2866226,0.0013297424,0.0031812072,0.0021282325,0.03522972,0.015524725,0.010256068,0.100577466,0.0019446346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095865835,0.00007064956,0.0007226754,0.00019515363,0.000043239965,0.00083491526,0.0064604348,0.00025068093,0.000502684,0.12758596,0.8472971,0.01594064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030407857,0.00024899203,0.0013527692,0.0020883814,0.00007987948,0.0029915096,0.013585386,0.0019957628,0.001352906,0.21501559,0.7604932,0.0004916032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00529918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056195967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89251035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01008983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013531825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5684664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140434392","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2014-102078","title":"Acknowledging awareness: informing families of individual research results for patients in the vegetative state","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Management of metastatic bone disease","field":"Medicine","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Endometrial cancer; Adjuvant; Internal medicine; Adjuvant therapy; Serous carcinoma; Hysterectomy; Cohort; Stage (stratigraphy); Carcinoma; Serous fluid; Obstetrics and gynaecology; Multivariate analysis; Cancer; Oncology; Gynecology; Gastroenterology; Surgery; Ovarian cancer; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.14500967071189239,"score_gpt":0.46351926429470036,"score_spread":0.31850959358280795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140434392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6743855,0.004604478,0.0057355836,0.29038444,0.0014023914,0.00030116836,0.00024423373,0.00019556987,0.02274667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9508125,0.004352327,0.008089929,0.03360899,0.00076819246,0.00036404573,0.00014384055,0.000030807303,0.0018294122],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99086773,0.007566645,0.00035242422,0.00020939969,0.00037946724,0.00062423694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9610976,0.018561581,0.009078308,0.0022646443,0.002825659,0.006172154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017577458,0.0002152353,0.0002657084,0.0009034989,0.003605038,0.0024264292,0.0008547141,0.002064792,0.0030548626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054014154,0.00032306573,0.00039385725,0.00051082944,0.0020139157,0.0039140983,0.0043097045,0.0027327987,0.00073684624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037637813,0.0010477477,0.5085401,0.00045899427,0.0000662092,0.0054659853,0.08924287,0.0002450826,0.0025794297,0.0023444085,0.07887701,0.31075582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003334187,0.0029393819,0.27335766,0.004514027,0.00025360426,0.00874962,0.44630805,0.0020586054,0.003396757,0.025387397,0.23229206,0.00040931956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023530717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039819484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017577458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011260294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005685295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09295958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140542250","doi":"10.1136/jme.2003.006247","title":"Therapeutic optimism in the consent forms of phase 1 gene transfer trials: an empirical analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; McGill University","keywords":"Optimism; Terminology; Informed consent; Psychology; Clinical trial; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Family medicine; Psychotherapist; Pathology","score_opus":0.8166840657639511,"score_gpt":0.7094448661430883,"score_spread":0.10723919962086281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140542250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9753645,0.0030061405,0.007540871,0.0036424464,0.00008122116,0.0041802493,0.00031815536,0.000026423175,0.005839982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933073,0.00053018297,0.0028032216,0.0007153332,0.0000477015,0.0023105084,0.000094554234,0.000013502773,0.00017774546],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.36705345,0.55107826,0.037304807,0.0057891235,0.03593446,0.002839926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.04936319,0.84177905,0.08541153,0.009918428,0.0123650385,0.0011627012],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4076356,0.0005588785,0.0010354907,0.0044451244,0.0034371056,0.0055589904,0.0018198842,0.0024019082,0.0026226544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8080611,0.000993053,0.0014441939,0.0045835115,0.011150306,0.008890755,0.0049902163,0.004413173,0.00034678928],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008409203,0.0018232779,0.41740507,0.008775189,0.0012085112,0.0009777786,0.39990243,0.0017449049,0.0011791197,0.017304674,0.0042975927,0.13697228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015055119,0.006943972,0.60187364,0.01771057,0.0016503567,0.0032065436,0.29352048,0.014165736,0.0046131206,0.018885111,0.035288185,0.00063680735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001312327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012485583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010065003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009780209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7304908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140644024","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2015-102663","title":"Research led by participants: a new social contract for a new kind of research","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Mental Health and Patient Involvement","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Wellcome Trust; Kaiser Permanente; Biogen; AstraZeneca; Sanofi; Robert Wood Johnson Foundation","keywords":"Public relations; Social contract; Work (physics); Social enterprise; Business; Political science; Law; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.9154554705388616,"score_gpt":0.7301121433476447,"score_spread":0.18534332719121682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140644024","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010593735,0.0031037577,0.015529356,0.50229985,0.19332905,0.007364893,0.007488907,0.002117242,0.25817323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04705949,0.0013562719,0.013738797,0.113592245,0.015660036,0.012041669,0.003257919,0.0026693377,0.79062426],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95397073,0.018738909,0.0021001368,0.005452447,0.014027796,0.005710049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78291655,0.013845146,0.004288662,0.024935436,0.06921607,0.1047981],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048334576,0.0012753189,0.002053294,0.0015039537,0.010280274,0.011136024,0.0033785226,0.006920741,0.25750917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.101897,0.0010477977,0.0010567739,0.0015638191,0.0044305143,0.009218425,0.022678852,0.015784604,0.14529772],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025309445,0.00017140781,0.0008394275,0.00011789969,0.000021706726,0.00025283606,0.002954423,0.000039474697,0.0021426622,0.0074699474,0.9560686,0.02966861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034830926,0.000052678417,0.0005003287,0.000068306035,0.0000031471998,0.000060768118,0.0023428232,0.0000499207,0.00008555723,0.0006823885,0.9961027,0.000016642192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050245193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012118839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9516654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005207515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03490871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.861454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142006956","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2013-101322","title":"Incentives for postmortem organ donation: ethical and cultural considerations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Rehabilitation; Gait; Physical therapy; Beck Depression Inventory; Montreal Cognitive Assessment; Posturography; Mini–Mental State Examination; Cognition; Clinical Global Impression; Depression (economics); Rating scale; Psychology; Medicine; Anxiety; Psychiatry; Cognitive impairment; Balance (ability); Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.1126703363574629,"score_gpt":0.3852947132242925,"score_spread":0.2726243768668296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142006956","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09333644,0.0071823373,0.05457932,0.5716842,0.018245708,0.01673303,0.0018233616,0.00052063225,0.2358951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4841962,0.003515626,0.061915144,0.3402256,0.009147845,0.022195676,0.00081900245,0.0002801827,0.077704765],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9351722,0.043175254,0.004511363,0.0031185618,0.009959365,0.004063207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8781115,0.06605224,0.0069082906,0.022231981,0.018032884,0.008663149],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.099380665,0.00062129094,0.0008017649,0.0010919673,0.0052495357,0.0073466683,0.0036765642,0.012777117,0.024464024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12901261,0.0006910856,0.00084281457,0.0009992556,0.004704379,0.0036042025,0.005155877,0.009085969,0.0053984937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021582225,0.0018231636,0.018510535,0.00095316215,0.00015742025,0.004081677,0.013290222,0.00096820097,0.0053333747,0.2651495,0.50890744,0.17866705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007548428,0.0012028208,0.025360737,0.004129647,0.00011243762,0.0062767873,0.010408648,0.004151464,0.0035333438,0.059425265,0.8843396,0.00030450278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023326776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049868952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.099380665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024266774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012201544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5255815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142127403","doi":"10.1136/jme.2006.017129","title":"Attitudes of research ethics board chairs towards disclosure of research results to participants: results of a national survey","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Nova Scotia Health Authority; Izaak Walton Killam Health Centre; University of British Columbia","funders":"IWK Health Centre; Dalhousie University; Dalhousie Medical Research Foundation","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Guideline; Research ethics; Set (abstract data type); Medical education; Ethics committee; Institutional review board; Protocol (science); Psychology; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Political science; Computer science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.8751013898017513,"score_gpt":0.733228617802285,"score_spread":0.14187277199946635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142127403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99702686,0.00023058135,0.00017188626,0.000905656,0.000012557855,0.0001005364,0.00020788165,0.0000053340505,0.0013386796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972046,0.00055868016,0.0004940424,0.000741152,0.000016545458,0.00015744193,0.00020988082,0.0000061667347,0.0006114854],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876286,0.0055287136,0.0014892413,0.0006234579,0.0034324587,0.0012976485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.946572,0.013332823,0.020898063,0.0016976707,0.011725468,0.005773911],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024384154,0.00013441655,0.00033518934,0.0011716762,0.0013634305,0.0018474365,0.00071325304,0.0009050852,0.0020203711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042091362,0.0004451862,0.0005469186,0.0013157486,0.0013757757,0.0014123168,0.0016883655,0.0014662623,0.00052832725],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010251615,0.00021219019,0.9681685,0.00016427043,0.000034671488,0.00009477107,0.018885309,0.00004020782,0.00034911296,0.00006412061,0.0011379087,0.010746363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008974523,0.00026056575,0.95466065,0.0001497411,0.000018746048,0.00013878985,0.042084817,0.00013709313,0.00016287883,0.000039151622,0.0023177906,0.000020767526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040000007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050250024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9990949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022708771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055737663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12895727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142268187","doi":"10.1136/jme.2007.020594","title":"What constitutional protection for freedom of scientific research?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Patient Dignity and Privacy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Freedom of thought; German; Political science; Academic freedom; The arts; Constitutional law; Sociology; Human rights; Philosophy; Higher education","score_opus":0.7052713485879302,"score_gpt":0.5873797607666167,"score_spread":0.11789158782131348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142268187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021258635,0.022523774,0.05085064,0.3468435,0.005396572,0.000376541,0.0021979336,0.00045508874,0.5500972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7841955,0.016412808,0.031587556,0.12114477,0.010269301,0.0022867334,0.0019400888,0.00043021998,0.031733073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9632482,0.014145367,0.0028037957,0.0071312115,0.008016533,0.004654997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9195959,0.044907816,0.0067202174,0.018425116,0.0062821093,0.0040688366],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046912897,0.0008301059,0.0022225673,0.0026657549,0.005112497,0.015313486,0.0035226133,0.014800251,0.01632411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09513867,0.0010011303,0.0024330518,0.0028098016,0.03226707,0.022661198,0.0050469204,0.011244386,0.004488796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021749094,0.000027782333,0.00020794309,0.00014731796,0.000020183337,0.000042984713,0.0004222286,0.00015064646,0.00018613288,0.98763984,0.005034892,0.0060983147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006686843,0.000029879015,0.00069016364,0.0007807202,0.00003755761,0.0001398072,0.0004078627,0.00021651221,0.00030083375,0.9001154,0.09716825,0.000046261986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055260877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026376848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99488753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0081402445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017016182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24810207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142287494","doi":"10.1136/jme.2005.013169","title":"Benefits, risks and ethical considerations in translation of stem cell research to clinical applications in Parkinson’s disease","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pluripotent Stem Cells Research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Dalhousie University; Stem Cell Network","keywords":"Parkinson's disease; Stem cell; Disease; Engineering ethics; Bioethics; Data science; Medicine; Bioinformatics; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Pathology; Biology; Engineering; Law; Cell biology","score_opus":0.4199405353045385,"score_gpt":0.5532013674500975,"score_spread":0.133260832145559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142287494","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000117737916,0.9868024,0.00036584164,0.008252881,0.0017556122,0.00001454659,0.0000070164765,0.0000053824083,0.0026785247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002485548,0.9893463,0.00080990477,0.004686663,0.001480846,0.000051251664,0.00001082333,0.0000055039914,0.0011230086],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995824,0.0022160294,0.00050602254,0.00021760583,0.0010629052,0.0001734121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98435915,0.013652904,0.00056120974,0.0001614865,0.0010356472,0.00022957903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009030365,0.00084564456,0.0014911437,0.0020228666,0.0010908268,0.004050889,0.0014722239,0.006403876,0.0024948164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013496911,0.00047470536,0.0007511911,0.0021203293,0.005490139,0.0046153497,0.0016834555,0.006613864,0.0008643146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053686697,0.00005696712,0.00016629865,0.021344328,0.000054929656,0.00077147403,0.0011777336,0.0005890303,0.00047121433,0.09485629,0.072441064,0.808017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000124767375,0.000047944995,0.00040995274,0.018854324,0.000039617727,0.0014956465,0.0005831929,0.00008659342,0.0001581825,0.02810504,0.95018065,0.000026486554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013918929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025897215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009030365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028359136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057957526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047757745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142449696","doi":"10.1136/jme.2009.032912","title":"Advance commitment: an alternative approach to the family veto problem in organ procurement","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Veto; Procurement; Organ procurement; Computer science; Data science; Medicine; Law; Business; Political science; Surgery; Politics; Marketing","score_opus":0.055820827429232035,"score_gpt":0.3763003641559736,"score_spread":0.32047953672674157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142449696","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053843893,0.0012478733,0.6326795,0.1092865,0.002410588,0.0010668772,0.000040938507,0.00027313104,0.19915059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7026108,0.0006486041,0.24993432,0.010052255,0.0007011169,0.0013808439,0.000023593026,0.000080217775,0.034568194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97350276,0.019304939,0.0006697386,0.0014550505,0.0036417504,0.0014257355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848492,0.007870145,0.0013485119,0.0035559807,0.001202557,0.0011736237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021907194,0.00064473395,0.0005519105,0.0014620522,0.008403405,0.0077555072,0.0034970038,0.010188809,0.005860933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026747463,0.00044940453,0.001363604,0.0015012723,0.021902831,0.01005797,0.011784287,0.009615058,0.000952936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034208788,0.000034458284,0.00029845617,0.000035704637,0.0000057219563,0.000092419235,0.0030060457,0.0005700475,0.00014947998,0.9790227,0.0015614082,0.015189348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000183156,0.00047060227,0.00077359634,0.0002747872,0.000056631503,0.0013025581,0.005853138,0.0073747453,0.00096497976,0.832963,0.1496707,0.00011215498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013634111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027573104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021907194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005016388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008770378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11585772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142620986","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2013-101757","title":"Taylor on posthumous organ procurement","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Bioethics; Sovereignty; Law; Organ procurement; Personal autonomy; Organ donation; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Medicine; Political science; Philosophy; Politics; Transplantation","score_opus":0.059876829293602205,"score_gpt":0.35926943280674667,"score_spread":0.29939260351314445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142620986","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00087997847,0.0063057537,0.00024528158,0.9653036,0.012454199,0.000017473576,0.00001845833,0.000013445532,0.014761749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008731687,0.0025231203,0.00019874077,0.9696945,0.009681059,0.00003389755,0.0000062044123,0.000013780472,0.009117054],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942735,0.0020715974,0.00045432826,0.00067554635,0.001687392,0.0008377153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99445736,0.004126022,0.00022050334,0.00016156571,0.0006615829,0.0003729117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044798,0.00045259317,0.0006921043,0.00041156943,0.0063244402,0.0034441217,0.0018638428,0.04536373,0.002686006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022454657,0.0005773514,0.00088849757,0.0005715398,0.006155366,0.004515259,0.0017809574,0.038746957,0.0023526954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004918445,0.000028769206,0.0003080003,0.00009607722,0.00000818883,0.0038714104,0.000956325,0.00008904201,0.00026556934,0.043733027,0.9389495,0.011644824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004537128,0.000061488405,0.00078810763,0.00088384864,0.000018992476,0.0037959735,0.0009617006,0.00039618526,0.00038017356,0.034269705,0.9583508,0.00004772787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015764158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025513051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04536373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058592362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010010192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04251194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142683768","doi":"10.1136/jme.2003.007021","title":"Ethical problems arising in evidence based complementary and alternative medicine: Table 1","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Victoria Park","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Alternative medicine; Health care; Ethical issues; Complementary medicine; Population; Medicine; Psychology; Data science; Computer science; Political science; Law; Pathology; Engineering","score_opus":0.3912484438029497,"score_gpt":0.5293332004573037,"score_spread":0.138084756654354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142683768","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008975184,0.9473653,0.0044566863,0.018724447,0.0032253356,0.0003357346,0.00017511703,0.00003557169,0.024784198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023371743,0.93698996,0.014380267,0.014369656,0.0028257766,0.0004610407,0.00023416984,0.000019874067,0.0073475414],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897159,0.005829616,0.0013767844,0.0003016219,0.0025334158,0.00024267641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810261,0.0146223465,0.0016451066,0.0002430328,0.0022852463,0.00017813995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008232523,0.0011889599,0.0015925484,0.004941555,0.0017105452,0.004346369,0.001191692,0.0033510844,0.007218746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017898014,0.00039569344,0.0010630798,0.007151292,0.002678018,0.0036477507,0.0017769192,0.0032508452,0.001266372],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008053412,0.000066435176,0.0012824787,0.04003237,0.00019144692,0.0011278959,0.0020222918,0.0007604952,0.00071086467,0.124408185,0.14144549,0.68787146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040595616,0.000080258156,0.0023334278,0.048853364,0.000181349,0.0084000565,0.0022857424,0.00030408005,0.0005153462,0.049796782,0.88715184,0.000057162146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002147882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046631433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008232523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029819459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006831085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043538213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143028025","doi":"10.1136/jme.2006.019273","title":"Ethical decision-making about older adults and moral intensity: an international study of physicians","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Salient; Ethical decision; Perspective (graphical); Moral dilemma; Face (sociological concept); Qualitative research; Psychology; Health care; Moral reasoning; Medical ethics; Grounded theory; Social psychology; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Social science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1347336365461287,"score_gpt":0.54532563932745,"score_spread":0.41059200278132135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143028025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931206,0.0007540232,0.0003869963,0.0021271661,0.000042810512,0.000024086909,0.000009412701,0.0000027587469,0.0035320865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99829775,0.00046901667,0.00016790735,0.00067594525,0.00003821397,0.000020832384,0.0000050499357,0.0000048490892,0.00032044045],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98056525,0.015655404,0.00090034114,0.000774188,0.0010736011,0.0010311669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91973203,0.05988424,0.0109407995,0.0012013454,0.0035607892,0.0046808217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022084935,0.0005527552,0.0007929077,0.0022040033,0.008958464,0.0071004173,0.0008645843,0.002391302,0.002097058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060890794,0.00059732056,0.00032539552,0.001811679,0.014955048,0.0068823732,0.007941122,0.004958004,0.00019152532],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001568206,0.000026143261,0.003747715,0.000025747302,0.0000027130857,0.00010988339,0.9941094,0.0000065781182,0.00013034983,0.0006281028,0.000104058316,0.001093767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071849045,0.000052150473,0.0046106395,0.00009942131,0.000004882006,0.00022369326,0.99123865,0.000049542243,0.00011999489,0.00031093243,0.0032683322,0.000014457804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059610237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006505807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022084935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003568764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033245445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.116797686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143441716","doi":"10.1136/jme.2007.023325","title":"Failure to report and provide commentary on research ethics board approval and informed consent in medical journals","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Izaak Walton Killam Health Centre; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Declaration of Helsinki; Medicine; Family medicine; Institutional review board; Declaration; Research ethics; Ethics committee; Human research; Alternative medicine; Political science; Psychology; Law; Psychiatry; Pathology","score_opus":0.707864584622671,"score_gpt":0.6650793859824372,"score_spread":0.04278519864023378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143441716","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027793003,0.025328178,0.0044120834,0.84289294,0.11190294,0.00089160405,0.00044482865,0.00022963871,0.011118485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.074867524,0.019867199,0.00968219,0.7284151,0.15531798,0.004098896,0.00050881464,0.00047111546,0.006771277],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.3279091,0.43853813,0.1440163,0.01173894,0.072400875,0.0053966525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.03952854,0.7793632,0.081064336,0.018363647,0.077089965,0.0045902464],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.37320414,0.0014299355,0.0029642347,0.008341858,0.0068421992,0.018217731,0.008387141,0.03580603,0.009565342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8616389,0.002392456,0.0023279318,0.011551195,0.02147788,0.012374905,0.0077501037,0.019810406,0.007465104],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042718375,0.000060065875,0.0019243875,0.0118074985,0.00032539468,0.00070523145,0.0072548166,0.000120804456,0.00038907578,0.012414572,0.9288204,0.03575047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006593571,0.0002568045,0.004014191,0.04586452,0.00045706495,0.0010976323,0.0071907397,0.0008666883,0.001992086,0.021948246,0.9153583,0.0002944191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024459893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016527661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96419394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012717139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03374051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7729509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143608323","doi":"10.1136/jme.2003.005942","title":"Patient–physician relationship in the aftermath of war","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Serbian; Empowerment; Patient Empowerment; Set (abstract data type); Medicine; State (computer science); Family medicine; Health care; Psychology; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.2694690204109599,"score_gpt":0.48464345255143815,"score_spread":0.21517443214047827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143608323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9552418,0.0023216875,0.0004368821,0.02042984,0.0003740095,0.000031855005,0.00003069198,0.000018534387,0.021114739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945621,0.0006852262,0.00011995448,0.0020860126,0.00011474356,0.00000951297,0.000012133901,0.0000049967352,0.0024054148],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99325716,0.0051590223,0.000107693704,0.00019367145,0.0003918137,0.0008905838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889992,0.0046698786,0.0019044603,0.00030050686,0.0009090178,0.0032170012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046939347,0.00013410073,0.00036708947,0.00059858576,0.008368095,0.004737646,0.0004954382,0.002519342,0.006078507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018574012,0.00023005859,0.00020624285,0.0005554482,0.00322386,0.0017614772,0.0030955104,0.00475871,0.0007742174],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052077376,0.00069558853,0.097038254,0.000159434,0.00008200058,0.016617432,0.78541124,0.00020472235,0.0021240923,0.01993425,0.022071738,0.055140536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080490514,0.0010238843,0.06949864,0.00022795089,0.0000430847,0.017885908,0.75677484,0.0004333078,0.0008602395,0.0050138147,0.14807184,0.00008599704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019948815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036281007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008368095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002140302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002911342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024824202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143620934","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2012-100882","title":"Burdens of ANH outweigh benefits in the minimally conscious state","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Traumatic Brain Injury Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Artificial nutrition; Law; State (computer science); Minimally conscious state; Medicine; Political science; Psychology; Surgery; Computer science; Parenteral nutrition; Consciousness","score_opus":0.1297816187749034,"score_gpt":0.41422010208478754,"score_spread":0.28443848330988414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143620934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43936238,0.004360958,0.025428643,0.17372265,0.0011440974,0.00012137002,0.00019162566,0.00007398272,0.35559425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983004,0.0004651472,0.0020489837,0.01115278,0.0002659094,0.000038890546,0.000014492048,0.0000072092203,0.0030026075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970806,0.0011514075,0.00021113266,0.0003164481,0.00076536677,0.00047502358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99463105,0.0033487896,0.0006071078,0.00055425393,0.00035368075,0.0005051316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004250191,0.0001850104,0.00043145605,0.00027481889,0.0013599395,0.0024101886,0.00048186784,0.003996761,0.004259592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016112562,0.0002325766,0.00042124005,0.00013099132,0.0048748716,0.002601215,0.0029767444,0.003586425,0.0004928356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042106595,0.0001251577,0.0054463074,0.0001189251,0.00007391019,0.0029107854,0.0018345466,0.00046463916,0.006632177,0.9413891,0.00559475,0.034988675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002188685,0.000770011,0.016786436,0.0005264201,0.00010517231,0.008300755,0.0020104893,0.0016664261,0.0042480635,0.9000775,0.06520787,0.00008205683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009148691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018236188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004259592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011931037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027614357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022477388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143851427","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2012-101075","title":"A study of consent for participation in a non-therapeutic study in the pediatric intensive care population","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Agricultural Research Institute of Ontario","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Informed consent; Guardian; Medicine; Legal guardian; Family medicine; Feeling; Cohort study; Pediatrics; Alternative medicine; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.635509471462439,"score_gpt":0.6600503302272991,"score_spread":0.02454085876486012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143851427","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939937,0.00093487627,0.0009057179,0.0011453803,0.00003184037,0.0013226939,0.0001817532,0.000005237081,0.0014787639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99668473,0.00030121012,0.0008330832,0.0005624349,0.0000383431,0.0013336743,0.00010254318,0.000004568394,0.00013935487],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8654134,0.10509366,0.011020758,0.003057597,0.012718568,0.0026960885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.63432777,0.20652597,0.123656236,0.015119605,0.012645563,0.007724882],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12091895,0.00032872686,0.0004851986,0.0017155184,0.0022606214,0.0026707228,0.0013382119,0.0015139852,0.0032132466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29529715,0.0006342899,0.0005789505,0.0025083893,0.0030192782,0.004216611,0.0022623353,0.002415938,0.0003765047],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008452676,0.0008746513,0.95367897,0.00045756242,0.00009528469,0.00065142754,0.030133607,0.00005187119,0.00019949504,0.0013702551,0.00088883395,0.010752764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032648654,0.0045543653,0.94441444,0.0013096929,0.00006488116,0.0023447855,0.04032028,0.0006215949,0.00034998578,0.00071688875,0.0049200184,0.000056647103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038874075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038328804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99848604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020464913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007541935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6394882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145198589","doi":"10.1136/jme.2006.016980","title":"Assault on editorial independence: improprieties of the Canadian Medical Association","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Association (psychology); Law; Psychology; Political science; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.16216377817466776,"score_gpt":0.5505104544992905,"score_spread":0.3883466763246227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145198589","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022789484,0.0056272103,0.00012221691,0.1736324,0.81557953,0.000037665155,0.00004607364,0.00007476387,0.0046522752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0052029933,0.007356903,0.00036333257,0.1306175,0.8400723,0.00005722536,0.0000368436,0.00008113856,0.01621174],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97442496,0.002704087,0.0018176314,0.00095865736,0.018374188,0.001720505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87860715,0.049500056,0.0034558342,0.0020765571,0.055584814,0.0107756],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017863564,0.0022344335,0.0032340088,0.0043638963,0.009490751,0.009702357,0.0062286668,0.029035507,0.0055036233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09740193,0.0012874166,0.001884146,0.0028479237,0.0060081473,0.0028714999,0.0011784189,0.028490338,0.002756554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029234601,0.000008048452,0.000042288677,0.0001165055,0.000018108381,0.0001791752,0.000049334874,0.000022806526,0.00003257669,0.0003719619,0.99560887,0.0035211844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093445364,0.000024739553,0.0008563854,0.0006806927,0.00009042598,0.00040241482,0.0001717765,0.00028521294,0.00020158096,0.0012258546,0.99590755,0.000059902988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054036766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1638277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98533386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014666122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026616836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107444465},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2146235412","doi":"10.1136/jme.2003.005181","title":"Better governance in academic health sciences centres: moving beyond the Olivieri/Apotex Affair in Toronto","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.4264682264886879,"score_gpt":0.6112815323606047,"score_spread":0.1848133058719168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146235412","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24731945,0.024373883,0.008705368,0.60220283,0.001432914,0.00029616096,0.00018636281,0.00014091827,0.11534211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9673474,0.0036905159,0.001959592,0.0126190595,0.00033993743,0.00004238911,0.000063320855,0.000027146421,0.013910623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98188776,0.006954493,0.0005898052,0.00091791694,0.002650626,0.0069994023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9570695,0.0072000176,0.003611086,0.0015714718,0.004495861,0.026051953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012175669,0.00026106235,0.00032210897,0.0009520615,0.013187133,0.014285297,0.0014516818,0.0050181113,0.005281021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016266461,0.00044307482,0.0004127387,0.0025593697,0.019722657,0.0044291266,0.008513167,0.0044006957,0.0002939162],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023287837,0.00009456733,0.026457533,0.00079525576,0.00007639804,0.003059605,0.0604706,0.004197087,0.0022616035,0.7416719,0.09137247,0.06931015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001503794,0.0002236477,0.08595593,0.00076290936,0.00006211859,0.00061184965,0.06432739,0.0022651104,0.0014089011,0.072452165,0.7715818,0.00019778521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7295289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8638533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86466175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13533823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1886078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9819522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146965490","doi":"10.1136/jme.2003.007484","title":"The Olivieri debacle: where were the heroes of bioethics? A Reply","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Porphyrin Metabolism and Disorders","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"St. Michael's Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Silence; Sick child; Wish; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Law; Medicine; Political science; Philosophy; Pediatrics; Aesthetics; Anthropology","score_opus":0.024232966257356128,"score_gpt":0.34058580473634026,"score_spread":0.31635283847898416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146965490","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000056684792,0.0012012806,0.000022733577,0.9964606,0.0020174584,0.0000011692465,0.000004759476,0.0000027515225,0.00023249717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024064926,0.0015061126,0.000092764516,0.9889474,0.005471771,0.000008127192,0.0000057863263,0.000014129093,0.0015474318],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99244624,0.0030670087,0.00070144096,0.0009264984,0.0018427535,0.0010160418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9486156,0.036668427,0.0024638663,0.0010283805,0.0050966097,0.0061271577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013542471,0.0008558313,0.0019713196,0.0007655563,0.009014594,0.007328333,0.0040440615,0.06642635,0.008187856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06085486,0.0011656649,0.00096869515,0.0012846978,0.016981417,0.012462856,0.005263513,0.09735268,0.0025023608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025094487,0.000007739571,0.0002311408,0.00007036433,0.000009488437,0.0004256287,0.0014931153,0.000029246185,0.000045282388,0.0104243755,0.9845479,0.0026907376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006647801,0.00002454548,0.0015858494,0.00087822863,0.00002607926,0.0015386435,0.008668645,0.00018526017,0.0001751424,0.018512778,0.96819466,0.00014375639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049705576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08326282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06642635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011793298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016601661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09883249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147007181","doi":"10.1136/jme.2010.037804","title":"How the public responded to the Schiavo controversy: evidence from letters to editors","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"NeuroDevNet; University of British Columbia; Montreal Clinical Research Institute","funders":"National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Institut de Recherche Clinique De Montréal","keywords":"Newspaper; Pluralism (philosophy); Clinical Ethics; Living Wills; Politics; Media coverage; News media; Proxy (statistics); Psychological intervention; Law; Political science; Public opinion; Psychology; Public relations; Sociology; Media studies; Epistemology; Engineering ethics","score_opus":0.1805731173230011,"score_gpt":0.5224807864474506,"score_spread":0.3419076691244495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147007181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8803951,0.0043451465,0.0006673346,0.05205405,0.0005618585,0.00013692495,0.00021425827,0.00002876268,0.061596554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985095,0.0022620843,0.0002827426,0.009496341,0.0010547698,0.00009098326,0.000072732415,0.000039697486,0.001605659],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.92530644,0.052507743,0.0039879256,0.0021073294,0.012781569,0.0033088934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.39600456,0.52395856,0.052581374,0.0070342175,0.017507143,0.0029141677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039543305,0.00028919504,0.0005467549,0.0050908,0.006041211,0.013848767,0.0010904705,0.0055307094,0.0032825365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.35104412,0.00060715224,0.0003057416,0.0052074357,0.011627414,0.0069317287,0.0044883443,0.0027902792,0.0008093999],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009714805,0.00023791764,0.08292479,0.0016828488,0.000089827845,0.0022627355,0.82636905,0.000107428685,0.0007952544,0.012815615,0.014194435,0.057548583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015828788,0.00038491,0.1401289,0.0040765926,0.00017825473,0.0018225958,0.68873394,0.0003512936,0.0017619263,0.008300255,0.15393308,0.00016990963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044078524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036617892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039543305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040520052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047279135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20912749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147194198","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2012-101311","title":"Honorary authorship in biomedical journals: how common is it and why does it exist?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Montreal General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Medical journal; Multivariate analysis; Library science; Psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Law; Political science; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.7377882140349933,"score_gpt":0.6333431856879266,"score_spread":0.1044450283470667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147194198","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91787976,0.053648174,0.0016174845,0.018946012,0.000779046,0.000044172506,0.0005439442,0.000066971355,0.006474342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885175,0.009090054,0.00057343784,0.0006517517,0.0006616536,0.0000140533275,0.00016895747,0.000016006483,0.00030651226],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96633184,0.012841065,0.006498952,0.002944416,0.009692857,0.0016909124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64319664,0.15574242,0.15777142,0.012414511,0.017262297,0.013612729],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016092142,0.00027168356,0.0006675874,0.007869567,0.0014798379,0.0046410575,0.0012317019,0.0015259824,0.004231001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1468777,0.0003239809,0.0005133508,0.011408488,0.003634733,0.004616969,0.0029056268,0.001367109,0.0006901527],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016133695,0.00009037729,0.87792975,0.001521012,0.00013441041,0.0010799629,0.0072980453,0.00006848625,0.00046961827,0.0013015849,0.004028684,0.10591674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003157943,0.00033606275,0.88338965,0.0047500725,0.00020388194,0.02203054,0.047519438,0.00065109634,0.00082029984,0.007808393,0.032324582,0.00013449299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011124224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001388241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.998474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001213407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020855682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08510435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148138299","doi":"10.1136/jme.28.3.196","title":"Present self-represented futures of value are a reason for the wrongness of killing","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canmore Museum and Geoscience Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscious mind; Futures contract; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis; Computer science","score_opus":0.10467753934777134,"score_gpt":0.3254203940422592,"score_spread":0.22074285469448784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148138299","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017553414,0.0025089013,0.00097544177,0.9608619,0.0031619223,0.000010932476,0.000012237406,0.000023009232,0.030690257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.045684155,0.0009995758,0.0005790389,0.9260676,0.0036412259,0.000050096805,0.000009796059,0.000031238338,0.02293734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99151623,0.0039281603,0.00051700376,0.0010447359,0.0020760675,0.00091788045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842201,0.01198831,0.00075273786,0.00085612014,0.0015802474,0.0006024939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008776408,0.0007656344,0.0012485143,0.0004687303,0.010418083,0.008953389,0.002900582,0.083396204,0.004759733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02721387,0.0008992999,0.0010684314,0.00042015643,0.02847318,0.012836166,0.004529051,0.072738394,0.002755473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061468265,0.000039920003,0.00044686612,0.00009895195,0.000018674904,0.0025970573,0.008878523,0.00015736476,0.0003108539,0.6150704,0.35963935,0.012680546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006267737,0.000066158835,0.000563964,0.00048398896,0.000016264832,0.0031209288,0.006228045,0.00057630654,0.00039336074,0.25485286,0.7335503,0.00008513616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008994592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019825013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083396204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007002065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066734566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05080384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148176058","doi":"10.1136/jme.2007.020776","title":"Ordering suicide: media reporting of family assisted suicide in Britain","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Assisted suicide; Contradiction; Psychology; Medicine; Law; Psychiatry; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.4210631310536104,"score_gpt":0.5384371795147426,"score_spread":0.1173740484611322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148176058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9708946,0.012551457,0.00021344455,0.0026382008,0.00023790238,0.000058888563,0.0031507357,0.000024245035,0.010230566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852448,0.009514353,0.00033390685,0.00049417844,0.00037844433,0.0000643587,0.0018515713,0.000022135036,0.002096229],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946936,0.002153316,0.0009570056,0.00021578006,0.001757581,0.00022275814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9191828,0.04569324,0.025329677,0.0013039716,0.007459651,0.0010306174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029905275,0.00028627596,0.00028521157,0.011651105,0.0007970869,0.0026415035,0.00042428053,0.0010019271,0.0030137901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03465299,0.00024246551,0.00015007748,0.009581741,0.001075285,0.0013690594,0.0013476459,0.0006123666,0.00060607574],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012753982,0.00016204064,0.6631883,0.009377088,0.00025594982,0.011153148,0.15018679,0.00018846548,0.00573465,0.0010793189,0.020699823,0.13669908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031345968,0.00020314133,0.8867475,0.002494881,0.00013101439,0.0075666937,0.05553758,0.0002720069,0.001662205,0.0001806034,0.04509278,0.00008031197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01429808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018387083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01429808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013625713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084957626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028429687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148201779","doi":"10.1136/jme.2003.006577","title":"Introduction to The Olivieri symposium","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Health and Conflict Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Battle; Law; Academic freedom; Sociology; History; Political science; Higher education","score_opus":0.11186028792937566,"score_gpt":0.508080210288748,"score_spread":0.3962199223593723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148201779","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00047000573,0.07563832,0.0012162523,0.27729192,0.5205781,0.0001090303,0.00032827433,0.00043909927,0.12392891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006892509,0.04920342,0.0012632887,0.12003178,0.4280777,0.00018545018,0.0004921109,0.0007320874,0.3931217],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975309,0.00045273473,0.00013297003,0.0004002122,0.0010615737,0.00042172198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944359,0.0011917154,0.00034905598,0.00021903295,0.0016020705,0.0022023146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00401188,0.0012141047,0.0007198567,0.0020195954,0.004437418,0.008638744,0.0018657491,0.0042688465,0.09870008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01232322,0.00047520857,0.0008390908,0.0010392086,0.0014984374,0.0043095592,0.0037512435,0.009808622,0.039895184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010859015,0.000010170618,0.000038531613,0.00006261895,0.0000010619526,0.000036160316,0.000073914154,0.000012570924,0.000033513803,0.0017033579,0.98302954,0.014987579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013775613,0.0000037189293,0.00010998137,0.000102101185,7.866733e-7,0.00004490617,0.0000662379,0.0000074713753,0.000011220645,0.00041594324,0.9992331,0.0000032342402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052269595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011042029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09870008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003487379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005355086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33018464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148902952","doi":"10.1136/jme.2009.032789","title":"The ethical physician encounters international medical travel","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Global Healthcare and Medical Tourism","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Point (geometry); Public relations; Health care; Travel medicine; Medical care; Business; Medicine; Political science; Nursing; Law","score_opus":0.0795210949276253,"score_gpt":0.5270799224893249,"score_spread":0.4475588275616996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148902952","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18046397,0.012567975,0.010724512,0.68767136,0.004109344,0.00006901586,0.000024461095,0.0000611094,0.1043083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9307139,0.0038483052,0.003171478,0.0561217,0.0017372814,0.00003366221,0.000008864055,0.000033397133,0.0043314584],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95755666,0.036423754,0.00084726256,0.00089156034,0.0025196527,0.0017611554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96565086,0.020652736,0.003918795,0.0012881262,0.0024131876,0.006076255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016367896,0.00038956822,0.0006644996,0.0006890397,0.012674648,0.009180008,0.00076866604,0.0115818875,0.0020623324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04929394,0.00038443002,0.00039998468,0.0005817087,0.041485645,0.006616443,0.009296073,0.0122881215,0.0005979506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011606022,0.00021605857,0.013531524,0.00033647995,0.00006343215,0.012830002,0.6160205,0.00047566718,0.0011277391,0.25237212,0.061182834,0.04172753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044342236,0.00023145287,0.0030000142,0.00095164974,0.000024162293,0.022476783,0.5207477,0.0006212994,0.0004588218,0.17062491,0.28070804,0.0001107748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013145318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022018347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016367896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002242888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067706998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08656275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149212362","doi":"10.1136/jme.2002.001370","title":"Law and policy in the era of reproductive genetics","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Legislature; Reproductive technology; Context (archaeology); Legislation; Preimplantation genetic diagnosis; Political science; Stakeholder; Reproductive rights; Diversity (politics); Law; Reproductive health; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Biology; Genetics; Population","score_opus":0.07227857283740495,"score_gpt":0.4304319101127644,"score_spread":0.3581533372753594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149212362","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00631937,0.011918382,0.0054736496,0.8966045,0.0013198706,0.00003708205,0.000026653322,0.000023524728,0.07827702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48202994,0.022474132,0.0134254405,0.42178777,0.006753674,0.00029473216,0.00005724066,0.00007731429,0.05309974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9753606,0.016042886,0.000744627,0.0017752727,0.0037741202,0.0023025938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9711638,0.021711951,0.0017130666,0.00093089155,0.0020072972,0.0024730095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03124535,0.00038057088,0.0005831915,0.0011642199,0.008136968,0.015280366,0.0015862491,0.030412491,0.0051698545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047149044,0.00048177806,0.0005439335,0.0013994536,0.034335203,0.012108402,0.0050176396,0.013150671,0.00093545933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005040641,0.000012360418,0.00014365897,0.000028512686,0.0000026279306,0.0001029452,0.0013399487,0.00022134355,0.00007322499,0.98323154,0.009567274,0.0052715684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015179495,0.00003523571,0.0004831923,0.00044493537,0.0000076158826,0.00013635996,0.00211398,0.00046808072,0.00013458559,0.772055,0.22408098,0.000024789619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008186883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072764424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03124535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012528179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025391104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16524321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149683033","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2012-100801","title":"In defence of academic freedom: bioethics journals under siege","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Siege; Bioethics; Political science; Academic freedom; Engineering ethics; Data science; Medicine; Computer science; Law; History; Engineering; Ancient history","score_opus":0.3546697758132368,"score_gpt":0.607770385402003,"score_spread":0.25310060958876623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149683033","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047745644,0.014966803,0.0022202071,0.8982738,0.05899415,0.000033955872,0.000013420684,0.00013757191,0.020585533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18332471,0.010654839,0.0044291513,0.5739037,0.20604573,0.00016826512,0.000037425514,0.00046346046,0.020972786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.81069773,0.099997416,0.017643537,0.008782462,0.051912658,0.010966113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4321262,0.37647066,0.047297448,0.029970681,0.073718145,0.040416874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14175628,0.0011346742,0.0027298904,0.009283403,0.023979694,0.08912261,0.005202767,0.048281215,0.0066263755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.41414785,0.0013110576,0.0022273299,0.007400958,0.04648704,0.058252856,0.022968777,0.033385485,0.0032515547],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017961893,0.0001539006,0.0021834848,0.0010153814,0.00011687235,0.001662986,0.028121457,0.00041422065,0.0007542958,0.5881635,0.29897606,0.07825817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007323374,0.00008179403,0.0010612564,0.0009970827,0.00004290827,0.0008199612,0.012157994,0.0003568323,0.00050219183,0.20570062,0.7780883,0.000117881405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008838132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011452143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14175628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008820817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032045253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7496878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151338592","doi":"10.1136/jme.2008.025643","title":"Is once always enough? Revisiting the single use item","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Data science; Computer science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.7170370260247181,"score_gpt":0.6304447329734427,"score_spread":0.08659229305127536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151338592","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0969163,0.014777045,0.0639949,0.7675,0.005240757,0.00024854738,0.000069963804,0.000079874284,0.051172644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8578337,0.008617855,0.032742515,0.09120385,0.0017356011,0.00027379947,0.000040914314,0.00013261916,0.0074191145],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8406319,0.12992343,0.007296859,0.0040126313,0.016056016,0.0020790987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7211265,0.23818757,0.011976535,0.009286515,0.01673344,0.0026894202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09531472,0.0008579914,0.0013529732,0.0016879074,0.010023237,0.012367122,0.0036480525,0.014418597,0.001915179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15676934,0.0009580206,0.0011483792,0.0016132538,0.07977361,0.0301694,0.011317771,0.016768076,0.0006802097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060729384,0.000052574247,0.0019282696,0.000866666,0.00003331716,0.003241781,0.550901,0.00019990257,0.0008660315,0.3864463,0.02131792,0.034085583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020972353,0.00012150462,0.001176125,0.0033507973,0.000050028873,0.0061259205,0.39029437,0.0008464599,0.0015870504,0.24315321,0.3531364,0.00013711167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031243034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040053767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09531472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075960606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010569825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50407845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151370161","doi":"10.1136/jme.2007.024000","title":"Myth of reincarnation: a challenge for mental health profession","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Reincarnation; Subject (documents); Dilemma; Mental health; Mythology; Order (exchange); Alternative medicine; Anxiety; Medicine; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Medical education; Psychiatry; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Engineering; Pathology; Library science","score_opus":0.10470395302396693,"score_gpt":0.5098159774459827,"score_spread":0.40511202442201577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151370161","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13480508,0.019423166,0.016776104,0.7876803,0.0064209145,0.00006240429,0.000019862035,0.00027300598,0.034539174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86473054,0.015046106,0.014708396,0.09058426,0.0043606954,0.00011710328,0.000023529907,0.00021169122,0.0102178175],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98459864,0.010452263,0.0005498543,0.0006540635,0.0028784268,0.0008666661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9638937,0.020088578,0.0047458666,0.0027709084,0.00378898,0.004711946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01907974,0.0005435619,0.00090512563,0.0008518537,0.011541524,0.007359236,0.0021462871,0.009578217,0.003048184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057039205,0.0005307017,0.000703004,0.00051079685,0.03986257,0.012062533,0.010005916,0.024772367,0.0010912016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009245068,0.0002446005,0.008461455,0.0008085681,0.00008461579,0.028578443,0.57598615,0.0003054118,0.0024914485,0.1425011,0.087983474,0.15246229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002395563,0.00023867472,0.0026000903,0.0028129166,0.000027398008,0.07425722,0.5338335,0.00046199586,0.00077543105,0.12264605,0.2621725,0.00015027833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010558175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019335799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01907974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027412742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075951223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100904524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151716583","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2011-100252","title":"Tacitly opting out of organ donation: too presumptuous after all?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Neurological Complications and Syndromes","field":"Medicine","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Complication; Medicine; Cerebral blood flow; Surgery; Organ donation; Subclavian artery; Intensive care medicine; Cardiology; Transplantation","score_opus":0.1578008563732879,"score_gpt":0.3800021811304643,"score_spread":0.2222013247571764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151716583","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070683755,0.007150356,0.0016645223,0.8938974,0.008603309,0.000033074986,0.000054702803,0.000056905134,0.017855912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5491204,0.010105139,0.0022458038,0.38581303,0.046203498,0.00006030849,0.000074092335,0.000052341886,0.0063253623],"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990803,0.00043115768,0.00011832257,0.00009830637,0.00012761989,0.00014428262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973224,0.0013696785,0.00038081783,0.00011533645,0.00025384003,0.0005580051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010860267,0.00034952755,0.0005377813,0.00035278738,0.0020390258,0.0014804031,0.00071992876,0.00887481,0.0020234114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010537838,0.00019145577,0.00037819598,0.0003366916,0.0022061497,0.0018757613,0.00069054373,0.007614242,0.0009802394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027844045,0.00020268926,0.035818767,0.0002825997,0.000082831866,0.71542555,0.0020427285,0.00048422354,0.0019847616,0.009155123,0.19310811,0.04113406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012672742,0.00019236139,0.008699584,0.00090440304,0.000053636126,0.82903117,0.0040578344,0.0016040003,0.0010461924,0.03770262,0.11648128,0.000100161335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00073224684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011495536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00887481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010638164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097203354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0077186227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152352660","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2012-101290","title":"Position statement on ethics, equipoise and research on charged particle radiation therapy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry","field":"Medicine","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre; European Investment Bank; Science and Technology Facilities Council; Cancer Research UK; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Position statement; Engineering ethics; Statement (logic); Clinical equipoise; Position (finance); Position paper; Psychology; Research ethics; Medicine; Medical education; Clinical trial; Political science; Law; Family medicine; Engineering; Pathology; Business","score_opus":0.20676621228491862,"score_gpt":0.49897361299479726,"score_spread":0.2922074007098786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152352660","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009623038,0.0040460657,0.0047527403,0.9384831,0.033617344,0.00016932258,0.000087500586,0.00004131005,0.017840356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03404671,0.004481747,0.018142575,0.8821341,0.027110199,0.00073737075,0.00016691706,0.0001739298,0.033006445],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8421597,0.08934224,0.015026339,0.006796625,0.037453424,0.009221701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64645886,0.26811254,0.0131804375,0.011957307,0.039557256,0.020733569],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14552286,0.0016303617,0.0026920522,0.0014440034,0.0102360435,0.01888424,0.006514927,0.0836395,0.0054849163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20549983,0.00132932,0.002223297,0.0017101486,0.020992044,0.01227335,0.013161424,0.06946964,0.0055032526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010745116,0.000093750605,0.0003159027,0.00050559686,0.000040433995,0.00084808527,0.0072237267,0.00034477428,0.00072894944,0.3660931,0.6052903,0.01840792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008793565,0.00012509087,0.0002825563,0.0021126468,0.00004096761,0.0009388063,0.0019516587,0.00050084706,0.00060944364,0.084792666,0.908441,0.00011638832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032498136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041064215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9163605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009283859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038995586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76960766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152415384","doi":"10.1136/jme.2010.041210","title":"Good parents would not fulfil their obligation to genetically enhance their unborn children","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Moral obligation; Obligation; Normative; Task (project management); Psychology; Abortion; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Economics; Pregnancy; Biology; Genetics","score_opus":0.09958575933661845,"score_gpt":0.40125031553920704,"score_spread":0.3016645562025886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152415384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5269504,0.0065532387,0.052414764,0.25958517,0.0017171861,0.00010516963,0.00014372736,0.00005999384,0.1524703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9794669,0.00089398556,0.0052467817,0.010318701,0.00014929687,0.00004626514,0.00001889716,0.000009085324,0.0038499893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99036586,0.0066138823,0.0002919554,0.00062144385,0.0016024901,0.00050437526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.960591,0.027053142,0.0042246613,0.004018315,0.0025868206,0.0015260336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019280007,0.00019600186,0.0003685615,0.00036807012,0.0019832964,0.0023112735,0.00069848064,0.003262254,0.0017255191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042103667,0.00024272435,0.0002507489,0.0001940969,0.020552097,0.0033485165,0.002919845,0.0032176143,0.00024726376],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006387599,0.00005613555,0.010149225,0.000072011244,0.000018855146,0.00046910995,0.011104076,0.00023429283,0.00054898043,0.95334756,0.004075616,0.019860327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007617675,0.0002946182,0.016649423,0.00036421142,0.00006370891,0.0022337928,0.014537749,0.0008509014,0.0033437894,0.8741876,0.08731666,0.00008135945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007123343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013614097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019280007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009275316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021534231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10196364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152491080","doi":"10.1136/jme.2006.020289","title":"Duty to disclose what? Querying the putative obligation to return research results to participants","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Duty; Computer science; Psychology; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Data science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.8631411267184941,"score_gpt":0.7083408936249084,"score_spread":0.1548002330935857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152491080","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012267391,0.006390607,0.02525818,0.9123685,0.0032485551,0.00023448956,0.00016666348,0.00007169406,0.039993975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4410234,0.009928313,0.028395921,0.50068146,0.004648062,0.0010970008,0.0002196434,0.00024052653,0.01376572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6388107,0.30268213,0.022103384,0.009534584,0.022147918,0.0047212583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.45579174,0.44306773,0.027303355,0.03972954,0.027528262,0.00657933],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.28953695,0.00061973796,0.0020011922,0.0018515608,0.008593046,0.01319989,0.0045600147,0.030819992,0.0061954204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4934108,0.0011965449,0.0013605166,0.0019435375,0.05982663,0.027910303,0.012854583,0.019703493,0.0029038053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019333698,0.00009112912,0.0031550203,0.00096392777,0.000071471884,0.0010084747,0.09094781,0.00023908837,0.0010467249,0.7842379,0.069349974,0.048695154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095145224,0.00011708611,0.0011505383,0.0034109897,0.000077138146,0.0026298964,0.028232664,0.0005574658,0.0014385078,0.6462097,0.31589383,0.00018699587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003712371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023146207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075542945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025607836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8761274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153371116","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2013-101648","title":"Returning incidental findings from genetic research to children: views of parents of children affected by rare diseases","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Genomics and Rare Diseases","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Regroupement Québécois sur les Matériaux de Pointe; University of Ottawa; Dalhousie University; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario; McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; McMaster University; Genome Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Thematic analysis; Enthusiasm; Medicine; Perception; Focus group; Qualitative research; Family medicine; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.02391114697367104,"score_gpt":0.3437980715224418,"score_spread":0.31988692454877077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153371116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99498063,0.0010476701,0.00040863737,0.0022685681,0.000042696145,0.000014332001,0.000037286653,0.000005755526,0.0011943877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978059,0.0008897591,0.0002641423,0.00063042785,0.000017791974,0.00002112555,0.000015926644,0.00000450774,0.00035025954],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99307066,0.0052329693,0.00031258975,0.00022277956,0.00063415046,0.0005268778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97308326,0.018511752,0.00449275,0.0005775697,0.0015329215,0.0018018021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00807108,0.0002940844,0.0005287444,0.00056831824,0.0031796696,0.0023129222,0.000572665,0.0013139797,0.0014822545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03003002,0.00042198843,0.00042002313,0.00058375817,0.004065505,0.001648246,0.0022713882,0.002141928,0.00014599462],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007873921,0.00001904477,0.045162465,0.00017255035,0.000017522843,0.0038744938,0.9426764,0.00004279201,0.00063501345,0.00042442832,0.0007095943,0.006187014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000547449,0.00009948342,0.015144779,0.00020832931,0.00002311254,0.0030801413,0.97692114,0.00004579304,0.0002414011,0.00016044,0.004044032,0.000025932924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011836494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011435144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011836494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021691807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00197722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042684436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153804538","doi":"10.1136/jme.2009.030346","title":"Clinical obligations and public health programmes: healthcare provider reasoning about managing the incidental results of newborn screening","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Genomics and Rare Diseases","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario; Mount Sinai Hospital; University of Ottawa; University of Toronto; Miller Group (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Duty; Health care; Medicine; Genetic testing; Normative; Family medicine; Qualitative research; Confidentiality; Newborn screening; Nursing; Psychology; Pediatrics; Political science; Business; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.06296920655960246,"score_gpt":0.411147985842741,"score_spread":0.3481787792831385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153804538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52884257,0.003215218,0.0017212644,0.43001133,0.00021206135,0.00010135997,0.00003458223,0.000014316427,0.035847243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917464,0.00045714178,0.00032414845,0.0072172442,0.000032435917,0.000010921674,0.0000056739577,0.0000021743417,0.00020376945],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9584098,0.032652806,0.0013457484,0.00087010517,0.0032296067,0.003491911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8906235,0.08469043,0.0122693805,0.001542745,0.0047650775,0.00610888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039679095,0.00017989227,0.0002203539,0.00082448096,0.0072109797,0.0057660253,0.001601475,0.006075475,0.003210039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12202526,0.00047148368,0.00032671628,0.00064344914,0.015972562,0.004092372,0.0052445303,0.0054720556,0.00015141629],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002917859,0.00034978558,0.23997843,0.0007390696,0.00011411852,0.0047639143,0.60233593,0.00084332144,0.00068282336,0.07899575,0.017562898,0.053342223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000116051204,0.00018947413,0.08492735,0.0033248845,0.00011832497,0.0032188506,0.8222549,0.0023721873,0.00068273296,0.039188303,0.043480072,0.00012689165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15055539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.093001835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15055539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024170175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046284713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29935807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156498790","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2012-100524","title":"Accessibility and transparency of editor conflicts of interest policy instruments in medical journals","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Subject (documents); The Internet; Computer science; Impact factor; Publishing; Internet privacy; Public relations; World Wide Web; Political science; Law; Computer security","score_opus":0.7590710822015326,"score_gpt":0.675394627864092,"score_spread":0.08367645433744064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156498790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74425745,0.018896153,0.04600963,0.071789116,0.0019009726,0.0020101974,0.0022418702,0.0011966552,0.11169807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9667486,0.0026400662,0.023888266,0.0031633123,0.00072499906,0.00039775536,0.0003979997,0.00013130123,0.001907778],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.712016,0.19725823,0.044298597,0.005765569,0.03617783,0.004483828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.06689656,0.77078164,0.11588109,0.022962144,0.019345427,0.0041331393],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17919025,0.00047071846,0.0009967202,0.008270053,0.0035496505,0.01596886,0.0018686863,0.0030853811,0.009348579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6848929,0.0010742224,0.000776902,0.0067916843,0.0046489253,0.0153351,0.0055877175,0.0035557146,0.0016306427],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019822456,0.0010085815,0.36627415,0.009524516,0.00045669344,0.0020283873,0.07052055,0.0014969661,0.0033835857,0.031953342,0.028089901,0.48328105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007225177,0.0022960885,0.4817022,0.020412324,0.0007859358,0.013657526,0.06399199,0.0089650005,0.017203437,0.1011737,0.28799585,0.0010935379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010931153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010363414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9969146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004142121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009770543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9476599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157295878","doi":"10.1136/jme.27.1.20","title":"Professional recommendations: disclosing facts and values","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Dalhousie University","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Heuristic; Advice (programming); Ask price; Psychology; Epistemology; Public relations; Computer science; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.15212241627076642,"score_gpt":0.4345955684014987,"score_spread":0.2824731521307323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157295878","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048237173,0.001971655,0.014895492,0.9042177,0.0060539674,0.00020019738,0.00010576628,0.00011967882,0.06761175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39186856,0.013050389,0.09259819,0.43440795,0.010918923,0.00081923255,0.00038969773,0.00027408203,0.05567295],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8462648,0.11005349,0.010777712,0.0025657837,0.027480684,0.0028575696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80734557,0.117532134,0.017049989,0.01281041,0.036850076,0.008411907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06687437,0.000626484,0.00061716477,0.0013909625,0.0069953403,0.010555005,0.002298617,0.02459483,0.00798906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29791895,0.00053797255,0.0005358372,0.0017842903,0.012879997,0.016374715,0.0066893552,0.016561043,0.0043759523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054908527,0.0001158487,0.0020297642,0.00068509876,0.00003311678,0.0014510056,0.065749004,0.0004319879,0.0006272877,0.3070094,0.5086896,0.11312297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025567515,0.000059366488,0.0008887416,0.0013847206,0.000021782342,0.0010804344,0.028410494,0.000569612,0.00039634673,0.17191596,0.795168,0.00007889572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039492724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005644646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06687437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004255456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020285165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3536697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157594633","doi":"10.1136/jme.2006.017376","title":"The need for additional safeguards in the informed consent process in schizophrenia research","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; McGill University; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Informed consent; Voluntarism (philosophy); Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming); Process (computing); Population; Psychology; Psychiatry; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Computer science; Environmental health","score_opus":0.29974717044718907,"score_gpt":0.6043686781546574,"score_spread":0.3046215077074684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157594633","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038302865,0.010936197,0.4164777,0.48694628,0.0058254744,0.0045571174,0.00011568076,0.00044536046,0.03639341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49661246,0.007413771,0.40336582,0.0776657,0.004615197,0.0071286354,0.000101755584,0.00018707437,0.0029096275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.38129175,0.5214415,0.045608696,0.008305742,0.038705755,0.0046465728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.17259875,0.70645607,0.030477857,0.06558712,0.019305527,0.0055746944],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.5457679,0.0010991546,0.0030136695,0.0032639648,0.0087101245,0.011750274,0.0056626946,0.029930245,0.0021612297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5817451,0.002404328,0.0025198057,0.0023644667,0.06404212,0.029426139,0.01122247,0.042393085,0.0012526637],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005663473,0.00027967725,0.003024873,0.002101932,0.00019740326,0.0028028258,0.080134995,0.0018995361,0.0037120099,0.76600826,0.013966052,0.12530598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000493521,0.00091736554,0.003741711,0.011015554,0.00020129912,0.011044387,0.014466934,0.0047684866,0.0045221755,0.82606864,0.1221251,0.00063477614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020194906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031243418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5457679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006821861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048917864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5601491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158512095","doi":"10.1136/jme.2006.020032","title":"Access to medical records for research purposes: varying perceptions across research ethics boards","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Dalhousie University; McMaster University; Montreal Clinical Research Institute; St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Medical record; Research ethics; Computer science; Data anonymization; Medical education; Internet privacy; Psychology; Medicine; Information privacy; Alternative medicine; Pathology","score_opus":0.9235046505256967,"score_gpt":0.7798831747659812,"score_spread":0.1436214757597155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158512095","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9813996,0.0019805,0.0037020023,0.0056302613,0.00009743965,0.00024978138,0.00008081183,0.000033459222,0.00682614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971607,0.0005004703,0.0011715576,0.00070926227,0.000023696772,0.00006810577,0.000035944333,0.0000150185615,0.0003153636],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.88096225,0.087343775,0.0074676704,0.0040234956,0.015005999,0.0051967967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7446757,0.17288405,0.037491076,0.0071078828,0.02349973,0.014341545],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08903049,0.00022150761,0.00043187867,0.0019755964,0.003452362,0.0052442914,0.0013499825,0.0011776048,0.0023119794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16375233,0.00047922003,0.00034408833,0.0019877467,0.007961554,0.0034232228,0.0053852876,0.0017727755,0.0002809086],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004741274,0.00014167125,0.3382428,0.0011242804,0.00011329583,0.0010832477,0.55640614,0.0003648664,0.004295706,0.0071712392,0.004187383,0.08639531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040043014,0.00030915492,0.2786741,0.0012230928,0.000035810357,0.0013636587,0.6858624,0.00055754336,0.0009266739,0.0030550302,0.02783157,0.0001208814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014158928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016584348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9109695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062596695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010403301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47084385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158992216","doi":"10.1136/jme.2009.033340","title":"Therapeutic privilege: between the ethics of lying and the practice of truth: Figure 1","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal; Université de Montréal; Centre Integre de Sante et de Services Sociaux de Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Lying; Privilege (computing); Psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Medicine; Computer security","score_opus":0.34165002706497544,"score_gpt":0.5419719592580532,"score_spread":0.20032193219307776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158992216","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01412094,0.015680835,0.073055506,0.3050719,0.0035139853,0.00015515403,0.000086459324,0.00014804139,0.58816713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8240639,0.009922471,0.039171014,0.044154316,0.0029581427,0.0004270095,0.00008529259,0.00015579376,0.07906191],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98921216,0.007902243,0.00024058869,0.0006332723,0.0014077575,0.00060401624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99589694,0.0026433219,0.00038790522,0.00027942655,0.00036167155,0.00043083445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067221457,0.000495475,0.000423808,0.0008878439,0.0060406784,0.012497347,0.0015317453,0.010521423,0.006938286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010206607,0.0003018044,0.000520421,0.0007602025,0.042335134,0.01130161,0.0062636547,0.009774724,0.0019701826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064621354,0.000005447577,0.000059465223,0.000025441703,9.993876e-7,0.00006860998,0.0060375407,0.000051789433,0.000045076784,0.9873707,0.003320003,0.0030084928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011329088,0.000028283057,0.00020473255,0.0003680966,0.0000051120137,0.00064470177,0.0053006546,0.00041226455,0.00012321987,0.82973546,0.16314434,0.00002178065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004240385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025191107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012497347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054404926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055739144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039473712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159244155","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2011-100086","title":"Testing relationships: ethical arguments for screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus with HbA1C","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Diabetes Management and Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Population and Public Health; University of Calgary","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; Disadvantaged; Medicine; Health care; Diabetes mellitus; Population; Ethical issues; Glycated haemoglobin; Type 2 diabetes; Intensive care medicine; Engineering ethics; Political science; Environmental health; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.3755771195750681,"score_gpt":0.43792921914682753,"score_spread":0.06235209957175941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159244155","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0052389945,0.0030327137,0.0048558274,0.9592395,0.0025750361,0.00004537508,0.000013955763,0.000014372496,0.024984233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27469245,0.0024648244,0.006777127,0.7026901,0.0064308667,0.000281802,0.0000174854,0.000041206084,0.0066041024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.817273,0.14823875,0.005144148,0.004743257,0.019144272,0.0054564886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69628644,0.26522782,0.01380404,0.0050346972,0.013263466,0.006383541],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.103389174,0.0008048253,0.0011581144,0.0013983699,0.012515291,0.011343823,0.0032773258,0.043680713,0.0039699688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20655817,0.00058184785,0.0017245937,0.0012559473,0.060476225,0.01637645,0.008704836,0.031401105,0.0012225412],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057217665,0.000058886682,0.00084883854,0.00017081502,0.00002206956,0.0011847914,0.0101153515,0.00015361077,0.00019278523,0.9317429,0.04665819,0.008794514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013791272,0.00017463005,0.0010930722,0.0013743311,0.00006873952,0.00430019,0.010939664,0.0013757676,0.0007930368,0.6798977,0.29971474,0.00013016956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021011482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015747112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.103389174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058102226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010039342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5467807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159494371","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2013-101458","title":"The challenge of crafting policy for do-it-yourself brain stimulation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"NeuroDevNet; University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of British Columbia; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Transcranial direct-current stimulation; Public relations; Computer science; Cognition; Stimulation; Political science; Psychology; Internet privacy; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.12839784542904648,"score_gpt":0.42413598404647257,"score_spread":0.2957381386174261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159494371","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027723839,0.0012383518,0.0068340916,0.9766213,0.0014459756,0.000074085576,0.000012987719,0.00002779794,0.010972915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33317876,0.0051493486,0.041684594,0.60430473,0.005020204,0.0012342642,0.000050342776,0.00018541748,0.009192379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7980012,0.15333547,0.007707884,0.007795128,0.025924016,0.00723632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.49154952,0.43377492,0.011006351,0.017917775,0.03159487,0.014156608],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.24103312,0.0008970457,0.0020138656,0.0017342558,0.011046648,0.023652976,0.0061421134,0.05667493,0.0053015705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27101687,0.0008715974,0.0011743904,0.0012908452,0.04921341,0.028643977,0.014877634,0.045115653,0.002038759],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007076136,0.00022624595,0.0005138203,0.0004867224,0.000048488288,0.00027130204,0.007440677,0.0009185306,0.0007151897,0.903751,0.054064386,0.031492915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012280745,0.00015417322,0.00043693345,0.0017516884,0.000048257167,0.00014642837,0.011163501,0.0015099973,0.0009297343,0.80341196,0.1802145,0.00011009157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004114108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034647617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24103312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013271522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06673863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9359413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159759625","doi":"10.1136/jme.2008.024299","title":"A comparison of journal instructions regarding institutional review board approval and conflict-of-interest disclosure between 1995 and 2005","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cancer Care Nova Scotia; Western University; Dalhousie University; Izaak Walton Killam Health Centre; Capital District Health Authority","funders":"","keywords":"Institutional review board; Conflict of interest; Ethics committee; Declaration of Helsinki; Medicine; Declaration; Editorial board; Family medicine; Medical journal; Library science; Political science; Alternative medicine; Informed consent; Law; Pathology; Computer science; Surgery","score_opus":0.8127877249082347,"score_gpt":0.6408262816142971,"score_spread":0.1719614432939376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159759625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9822625,0.008596224,0.0005182499,0.0019843227,0.0002457822,0.00022496046,0.0011610277,0.000024097419,0.0049828407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917338,0.0029822201,0.00073209655,0.0015619475,0.00019745824,0.0003062134,0.0018603209,0.000020392248,0.00060559664],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95560646,0.01625101,0.011893109,0.0026124076,0.0116927,0.0019443186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6623563,0.115361296,0.1698062,0.0052315597,0.039706238,0.0075384774],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031753145,0.00025774603,0.00047849244,0.005345636,0.00071243645,0.0038598878,0.0011408781,0.0010522758,0.0010474978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20549037,0.00042393547,0.0006093485,0.006897757,0.0009936672,0.0019326222,0.0014924472,0.0008903201,0.00024032233],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002907251,0.000442174,0.91784793,0.0013981774,0.00045120376,0.00044251568,0.0058823903,0.00028469047,0.00045546543,0.00079958246,0.007048452,0.062040117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010134817,0.00041025816,0.9893477,0.0003730057,0.00009276349,0.00043041617,0.0030279087,0.000106749154,0.00023790909,0.00008699544,0.0057577654,0.000027225771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007446815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012907397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9682469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053640646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043062624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16792864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159796110","doi":"10.1136/jme.26.4.295","title":"Truth and the Child 10 years on: Information Exchange in Donor Assisted Conception","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Hospital for Sick Children; SickKids Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Anonymity; Donor insemination; Freedom of information; Association (psychology); Law; Sociology; Political science; Library science; Artificial insemination; Psychology; Computer science; Biology; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.04666545340649797,"score_gpt":0.36194002622399823,"score_spread":0.31527457281750026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159796110","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039526038,0.06643341,0.0044842036,0.71110755,0.0061408663,0.000086845146,0.000079785605,0.000029723082,0.17211156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7759766,0.056865588,0.0029549852,0.13239083,0.0075203623,0.00020752507,0.00007015633,0.00005273246,0.023961298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9567118,0.03472896,0.0015855547,0.0009842286,0.0037229508,0.0022666063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88504976,0.105274715,0.0034941935,0.0015480258,0.0025020172,0.0021313855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04014766,0.00027509205,0.000623761,0.0012632591,0.012823006,0.014839461,0.0014401466,0.012929775,0.0042915726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.081926905,0.00059427234,0.000441679,0.0022578214,0.025677603,0.02162125,0.010820776,0.016665306,0.00062321604],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010965558,0.000039446015,0.0016210696,0.00032765343,0.00001438755,0.003482213,0.1856715,0.00011012666,0.00013624737,0.7087275,0.04564757,0.05411269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048531067,0.00013160885,0.0019244476,0.0032732508,0.00003237673,0.004366643,0.08355988,0.00017024663,0.00041168166,0.17127027,0.7347323,0.00007885525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004957929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008127948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04014766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074225953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012961128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21232367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160119656","doi":"10.1136/jme.26.2.126","title":"Paying research subjects: participants' perspectives","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Informed consent; Clinical trial; Psychology; Medicine; Family medicine; Alternative medicine; Medical education; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.7970960143689667,"score_gpt":0.7061380627299125,"score_spread":0.09095795163905418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160119656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89461833,0.003586329,0.0025892905,0.0824175,0.0012655297,0.0004413151,0.00014643827,0.000037498758,0.014897704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98275095,0.0012963641,0.0009652364,0.011838997,0.00040022592,0.00033660498,0.000037972917,0.00002055295,0.0023531716],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9146396,0.07197884,0.001838415,0.0013046314,0.006063788,0.0041746655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9011951,0.072469234,0.008009892,0.001692496,0.0084759,0.008157387],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.063916855,0.00054284657,0.0007388509,0.0011102628,0.008880685,0.007861164,0.001494029,0.004825376,0.0024960118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11126526,0.00047319237,0.00060750707,0.0010277177,0.008034252,0.0033163638,0.005986799,0.0048329476,0.0003995891],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011540485,0.00003842115,0.0077177645,0.0002025588,0.000013632624,0.0009817709,0.9773971,0.00002924006,0.0006371107,0.0018205892,0.0025614188,0.008485008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028548475,0.00016179318,0.0028254609,0.0004072973,0.000015874517,0.0006951101,0.97104776,0.00008397403,0.00022374568,0.0008848785,0.023592103,0.00003342245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00482754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046533006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99517465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037809396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071486384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3380286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160442946","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2012-100545","title":"Commentary on ‘Biodefence and the production of knowledge: rethinking the problem’","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Biosecurity; Politics; Knowledge production; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Production (economics); Engineering ethics; Data science; Political science; Law; Computer science; Medicine; Philosophy; Economics; Knowledge management","score_opus":0.04220866825132614,"score_gpt":0.3343971719084531,"score_spread":0.29218850365712695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160442946","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011502753,0.0005452182,0.000036624886,0.99144816,0.0068195704,0.0000033263022,0.000013556546,0.0000066908988,0.0010118616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016683812,0.00025831125,0.00008244566,0.98634005,0.008877787,0.000016961441,0.000006209597,0.000010803189,0.0027390858],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99031866,0.0032427057,0.0006903253,0.0013033894,0.0031408824,0.0013041801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9743313,0.017975004,0.0011556922,0.00062849675,0.0037396355,0.0021698447],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0098106,0.0009948247,0.0015864552,0.0010029916,0.01085926,0.0068800626,0.0050211307,0.09971035,0.0059133805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053360995,0.0011999358,0.0015607405,0.0014067219,0.011217286,0.010024231,0.0033494444,0.07698216,0.004112772],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024939463,0.0000073701376,0.000059500402,0.00003493881,0.000004199842,0.0003037203,0.0005495307,0.000026298503,0.000072596566,0.004702125,0.9922644,0.0019503915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008708529,0.000032453656,0.0006447392,0.0004235519,0.000021275186,0.00055394095,0.0014777536,0.00025083445,0.0002875971,0.019651916,0.9764949,0.00007389381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026586192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04120742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98914075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009274302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013144749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06729013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161498239","doi":"10.1136/jme.2010.041350","title":"What does ‘respect for persons’ require? Attitudes and reported practices of genetics researchers in informing research participants about research","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Health Canada; Genome Canada","keywords":"Obligation; Psychology; Field (mathematics); Medical education; Public relations; Social psychology; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.9509581661780104,"score_gpt":0.7509953887510706,"score_spread":0.1999627774269398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161498239","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91844827,0.005948883,0.0066599166,0.06043041,0.0004297741,0.00012656694,0.00005949648,0.000045469296,0.00785124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914622,0.00120668,0.0024640167,0.0044855555,0.000098089564,0.000050718863,0.000016763917,0.000011103651,0.00020486655],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.7931762,0.17295916,0.011932719,0.003313062,0.014819687,0.0037991586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.53160673,0.29907385,0.10258626,0.018194865,0.025130391,0.023407854],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16731195,0.0002928218,0.000787437,0.0016887295,0.005229506,0.006694097,0.0016793988,0.005244988,0.0013186962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3240899,0.0007291916,0.000752623,0.0013761112,0.018011676,0.007889174,0.0061943545,0.00554013,0.0002975792],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002559169,0.00022246272,0.18656012,0.0014952208,0.00020699055,0.0017748313,0.741289,0.00017566557,0.0023791296,0.0059763505,0.0031225043,0.05654183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058727564,0.00090545375,0.09348734,0.0026931595,0.0001393787,0.006226432,0.86169237,0.00036196967,0.0012795044,0.008754005,0.024196329,0.00020527396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037573888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039456016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.994755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003476816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009801928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8848407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162252291","doi":"10.1136/jme.2006.019224","title":"Terminal sedation and the “imminence condition”","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Sinai Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Sedation; Palliative sedation; Assertion; Palliative care; Terminal care; Medicine; Terminal (telecommunication); Intensive care medicine; Psychology; Anesthesia; Nursing; Computer science","score_opus":0.19931221612914443,"score_gpt":0.4871061675887391,"score_spread":0.28779395145959463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162252291","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04650684,0.048615813,0.029515265,0.5881955,0.005592275,0.00008452149,0.000029429899,0.000035206453,0.28142515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8453567,0.013600026,0.008435614,0.116786726,0.003950416,0.00013544982,0.000023976814,0.00002282233,0.01168817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98237795,0.012928398,0.00069340446,0.0006329857,0.0025973483,0.00076990627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845595,0.012008415,0.0015902427,0.000509496,0.0008185369,0.00051390805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008656809,0.0002567554,0.00030719873,0.00049726065,0.00299534,0.0025945245,0.00076816516,0.008816745,0.0016084318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018962754,0.00017434989,0.00038076413,0.00035293857,0.039908294,0.00525218,0.0046653748,0.009168283,0.0003154703],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010377218,0.000010023472,0.00021633043,0.00007170558,0.000002151187,0.00027670115,0.0041464106,0.000056630324,0.000082468716,0.98418206,0.004198984,0.00674627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028331755,0.00011703284,0.0015286796,0.0008946189,0.0000102582935,0.0038354953,0.003992923,0.00038316546,0.0003495937,0.74829495,0.2405231,0.000041853218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007110023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010940159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008816745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018735772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037284757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04578215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162812126","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2013-101534","title":"Should we perform kidney transplants on foreign nationals?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Interim; Transplantation; Organ donation; Medicine; Refugee; Political science; Health care; Politics; CLARITY; Public relations; Public administration; Law; Surgery","score_opus":0.09240396224578429,"score_gpt":0.3785419289510917,"score_spread":0.2861379667053074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162812126","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017346587,0.012023165,0.0015192104,0.9254518,0.0042642937,0.000024077468,0.000030795345,0.00002290033,0.03931719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46572074,0.022087242,0.004914472,0.4716146,0.0028702668,0.000041497246,0.000041310523,0.00007166451,0.032638185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935241,0.002234458,0.0002386367,0.00044644877,0.0016999776,0.0018564683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99294394,0.0016667951,0.00061949476,0.0002996575,0.0013332261,0.0031369296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077513917,0.00023476417,0.0003456949,0.0003212325,0.0115912305,0.005404549,0.0016459478,0.008409438,0.00322567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017720737,0.00021298439,0.0003982691,0.0005127205,0.01771858,0.0033013928,0.0033410501,0.010685775,0.0009603016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098323624,0.00012009547,0.017322551,0.00047934212,0.000047229667,0.008020993,0.0434802,0.00064253336,0.0010519186,0.47157758,0.33615747,0.1210018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003331254,0.000061750274,0.0074676923,0.0017492792,0.000031289757,0.0063448567,0.04145141,0.0003233355,0.0004891611,0.07406526,0.86787385,0.00010886862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.366016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5610482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.366016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012562618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06720317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7277711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163817877","doi":"10.1136/jme.2009.033142","title":"Ethics committees for biomedical research in some African emerging countries: which establishment for which independence? A comparison with the USA and Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Georgetown University","keywords":"Research ethics; Independence (probability theory); Context (archaeology); Ethics committee; Medical ethics; Underdevelopment; Political science; Compromise; Medicine; Public administration; Economic growth; Law; Geography; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.34833967613647676,"score_gpt":0.5714392614360654,"score_spread":0.22309958529958862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163817877","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8188962,0.023802456,0.00093313196,0.07243231,0.00030464088,0.0003083545,0.00013768245,0.000010765986,0.083174385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98847735,0.0067401733,0.00072578073,0.002331933,0.000022877215,0.0000811542,0.000027376082,0.000007110027,0.0015862348],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.983155,0.007994726,0.00061571825,0.00047659336,0.0026565173,0.0051013744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95809036,0.012466773,0.0062283804,0.0007760623,0.009783004,0.012655358],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0144727165,0.00017405722,0.00027463635,0.002377366,0.010269412,0.005963593,0.0008819452,0.0011929838,0.0018150778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03125328,0.00028795833,0.00024772083,0.0054711113,0.00664617,0.0024001626,0.0032918607,0.0026003716,0.000114076254],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003309882,0.00023311996,0.31243557,0.001555489,0.000075646094,0.0031785734,0.320049,0.00036990774,0.0013219764,0.190969,0.01989449,0.14958622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065617896,0.000069872345,0.45442232,0.0034821334,0.000050005183,0.0007111208,0.4146848,0.00025353723,0.0003718683,0.0042622,0.121554226,0.00007216036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6283036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82491165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.998807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032713126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.121181555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7477708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164662575","doi":"10.1136/jme.2007.020891","title":"Clinical ethicists’ perspectives on organisational ethics in healthcare organisations","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"St Joseph's Health Centre; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nursing ethics; Health care; Business ethics; Information ethics; Organizational ethics; Clinical Ethics; Engineering ethics; Applied ethics; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.38614826907656,"score_gpt":0.6209770775702546,"score_spread":0.23482880849369453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164662575","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62631345,0.019001903,0.007612829,0.22899422,0.0011471466,0.00016782718,0.000031499258,0.000051781866,0.116679385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98409444,0.0024245074,0.0008051895,0.0087251,0.00021320347,0.00004211125,0.00001066239,0.000013731366,0.0036711528],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.92453057,0.06249407,0.0016642808,0.0010068059,0.0052213413,0.0050829127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8797984,0.07840219,0.012329366,0.0018350424,0.0082569625,0.019377962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043999795,0.00040876458,0.0004422891,0.0020666006,0.015843332,0.013728245,0.0013474983,0.0048056003,0.004090709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04377309,0.0004791355,0.00044882958,0.0015557382,0.05499872,0.004837309,0.010993935,0.008918622,0.0005305161],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026245114,0.000054954045,0.0060920864,0.00022590929,0.000011523322,0.0017414291,0.9427357,0.00025861553,0.00057964213,0.033280652,0.005866655,0.009126593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032619613,0.00008712777,0.0066507277,0.0010651438,0.0000122255915,0.0021753411,0.82189554,0.00027034731,0.00027191296,0.017559852,0.14991325,0.000065885135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016731793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020971553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043999795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01909059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041728113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23269594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165057324","doi":"10.1136/jme.2009.034900","title":"The ethical professional as endangered person: blog notes on doctor–patient relationships","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Innovations in Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Set (abstract data type); Confusion; Narrative; Burnout; Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Social media; Social psychology; Public relations; Political science; Law; Psychoanalysis; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.09258695591778131,"score_gpt":0.43638039950417506,"score_spread":0.34379344358639374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165057324","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9202155,0.0029983525,0.004108879,0.019362783,0.0012121506,0.00011150843,0.00031674196,0.000116890486,0.051557146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98706925,0.0012525507,0.001224046,0.0021808748,0.0003386412,0.0000706476,0.00009323429,0.00007961765,0.007691104],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921435,0.0063349223,0.0002137117,0.00028829311,0.0005439959,0.00047548817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9178903,0.07470385,0.0033662731,0.0014221001,0.00081559655,0.0018018087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060987263,0.00065323163,0.0005021823,0.0018468474,0.010370936,0.0068020276,0.0012076062,0.0036900137,0.0051655397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031590197,0.0004995886,0.00029034598,0.0018153811,0.00871115,0.0088916365,0.0067831436,0.0051946808,0.0007981654],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014830077,0.00009148455,0.0043490566,0.00021468292,0.000010823267,0.0025412326,0.967151,0.00006734951,0.0009760492,0.005056626,0.005699905,0.013693557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002317958,0.000082043756,0.004987482,0.00035247984,0.000014784283,0.0016326224,0.88979053,0.00025016547,0.00085637695,0.0022429076,0.09971338,0.000053972217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011468951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041286866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010370936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002209955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013934983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032253563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165237771","doi":"10.1136/jme.2007.023481","title":"Hopes for Helsinki: reconsidering “vulnerability”","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Data science; Computer science; Political science; Psychology; Computer security","score_opus":0.7997176764814634,"score_gpt":0.6373667470744877,"score_spread":0.1623509294069757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165237771","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022552756,0.011324319,0.055929054,0.86300343,0.038570292,0.0003764956,0.00023324722,0.00023023276,0.0280777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17630635,0.01592135,0.100262314,0.660719,0.02886209,0.004114455,0.00050761184,0.0009131378,0.012393737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6144652,0.3000206,0.025514726,0.013812813,0.039191544,0.006995175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.42283288,0.50224847,0.0155883,0.032698452,0.01762856,0.009003276],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.35027778,0.0016576146,0.0033405486,0.0036576719,0.012722942,0.02661709,0.011509831,0.02872136,0.0047185933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4514345,0.00232113,0.0017082895,0.0031241875,0.12936667,0.036928426,0.020767363,0.07305765,0.0022850665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043594904,0.000014225181,0.00015546635,0.00037647516,0.000022538361,0.00046080688,0.021744529,0.00025579517,0.000092305105,0.8797768,0.08444063,0.012616841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030784104,0.000029229644,0.0001020245,0.0024587235,0.000015622107,0.00037223502,0.0044395467,0.0006690426,0.00016226454,0.75655454,0.23506927,0.00009673489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004831714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044687237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97127867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0109516615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047348443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80122316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166034247","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2013-101614","title":"Veracity and rhetoric in paediatric medicine: a critique of Svoboda and Van Howe's response to the AAP policy on infant male circumcision","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Genital Health and Disease","field":"Medicine","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific evidence; Rhetoric; Citation; Interpretation (philosophy); Medicine; Alternative medicine; Evidence-based policy; Male circumcision; Psychology; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Population; Computer science; Environmental health; Pathology","score_opus":0.03173726424596425,"score_gpt":0.3988932693223094,"score_spread":0.36715600507634516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166034247","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000521946,0.006039525,0.0008198965,0.98455226,0.004392532,0.000004462289,0.000005526669,0.0000084827925,0.0036554374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.052441474,0.007263647,0.0022799685,0.9134455,0.020837996,0.000076903074,0.000011177489,0.000114976254,0.0035284194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.88972646,0.075985655,0.0058814725,0.005029035,0.019645173,0.0037322484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6643809,0.31150454,0.0059140413,0.0023598562,0.011888739,0.0039518867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09878229,0.0009705454,0.0020216107,0.003487898,0.014776859,0.01951001,0.0060175606,0.042362984,0.0024125574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18776152,0.0015726651,0.0020843877,0.0030969633,0.086355865,0.01866237,0.012221429,0.07522193,0.00081070437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036884285,0.00002275476,0.00029120038,0.00030614695,0.00003978668,0.0006370496,0.04468949,0.000224374,0.00011174295,0.72537315,0.2156897,0.012577853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066160406,0.000040168325,0.00043911664,0.002562398,0.000051545532,0.00064159883,0.011214195,0.00047069657,0.00034364228,0.268568,0.71550524,0.00009712845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012527295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01351081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09878229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013146773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019946963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52241695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166062050","doi":"10.1136/jme.2010.035501","title":"Enhancing the fairness of pandemic critical care triage","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Disaster Response and Management","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Triage; Pandemic; Context (archaeology); Health care; Health care rationing; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); H1n1 pandemic; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Medicine; Medical emergency; Law; History","score_opus":0.150414184831343,"score_gpt":0.5521585415683361,"score_spread":0.4017443567369931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166062050","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2157149,0.0009590849,0.35489908,0.103616655,0.0014003295,0.002108952,0.000068062895,0.00029865847,0.3209343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9539734,0.00018208989,0.03664274,0.0036619944,0.00017936433,0.00042286125,0.000013807422,0.00004704175,0.0048767445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.84592944,0.12007954,0.0033144797,0.0034778935,0.020517476,0.0066811256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8895361,0.07430953,0.006292742,0.011115203,0.01294982,0.0057966346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13260902,0.00043657343,0.00060960936,0.0014260543,0.015569054,0.008243607,0.00255652,0.0044043805,0.0026691088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16585636,0.00053014787,0.0007326919,0.00088672835,0.025178146,0.0072143907,0.01751983,0.0070119016,0.00041940296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002864472,0.00024209262,0.0075898753,0.00035714268,0.000053941923,0.0005950377,0.18756203,0.005279417,0.0034725012,0.63939595,0.0066662007,0.14849938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025419172,0.0005334801,0.01227443,0.0013438344,0.00008976329,0.00073400466,0.071723185,0.014157468,0.008485571,0.60359484,0.28652233,0.00028696982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03408126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045534976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13260902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018406544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058051962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70131195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166542121","doi":"10.1136/jme.2002.002170","title":"Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Reproduction; Reproductive technology; Legislature; Germline; Government (linguistics); Emerging technologies; Law; Political science; Internet privacy; Biology; Embryo; Genetics; Computer science","score_opus":0.08314540064738266,"score_gpt":0.3739440652895189,"score_spread":0.2907986646421362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166542121","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002672216,0.011276315,0.0003020275,0.9555649,0.012006871,0.000055457003,0.00011059318,0.000030813033,0.017980833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014985299,0.0075486978,0.0006435601,0.937724,0.0053903977,0.000046905574,0.0000471273,0.000048707705,0.033565287],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97814846,0.0025943771,0.0015198871,0.001396306,0.011299066,0.005041808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97109646,0.01732357,0.0014077014,0.0003211656,0.007886367,0.0019646818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013084374,0.001396667,0.0013763496,0.0013776198,0.025265442,0.006372269,0.006099545,0.058128953,0.005112031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027718937,0.0011807987,0.001910146,0.0030732786,0.016979061,0.0037385554,0.0035385366,0.03582108,0.0011475098],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008160848,0.000029342233,0.0007612403,0.00044787987,0.000014893846,0.002286504,0.014765547,0.00035786317,0.0012540752,0.036931325,0.93074054,0.012329237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025165007,0.00003407268,0.0024361017,0.000539474,0.00003099608,0.00049503054,0.0079796575,0.00013970477,0.0004240741,0.0023729333,0.9853957,0.00012711217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89355826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.949882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9353843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06461572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10981583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46882206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166557932","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2012-101282","title":"Legislative regulation and ethical governance of medical research in different European Union countries","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; European union; Legislature; Appeal; Corporate governance; Political science; Medical research; Informed consent; Public relations; Research ethics; Public administration; Law; Medicine; Business; International trade; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.4459220898785673,"score_gpt":0.5965759319381693,"score_spread":0.15065384205960197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166557932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58203876,0.11414328,0.039825927,0.08778163,0.0016281109,0.0013130867,0.0008593741,0.00029100126,0.17211884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.961951,0.009572576,0.0143092,0.010957144,0.00024691786,0.0005226528,0.00036631533,0.000062624465,0.0020115608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.73438966,0.21035318,0.025395645,0.007978716,0.015713513,0.0061692772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.618988,0.2830112,0.052100424,0.019037697,0.020274222,0.0065885102],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20603909,0.00031910592,0.0010144599,0.0063005243,0.00351372,0.0112305945,0.001839391,0.004764796,0.0018268123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22163308,0.0008934026,0.0008088872,0.009466078,0.010008958,0.007153785,0.0057255756,0.0030895423,0.00027803204],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004935923,0.00029402407,0.07646446,0.0042913337,0.00043525692,0.0018940221,0.07119101,0.0041301674,0.001828899,0.6523372,0.014438129,0.17220192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027396745,0.00060711714,0.2987401,0.023877118,0.00040660138,0.004031005,0.071769446,0.0030963474,0.004041718,0.101320446,0.49140236,0.00043384524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026672513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019748744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9952352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062428913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011655746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97909516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168098734","doi":"10.1136/jme.2003.005330","title":"The Olivieri debacle: where were the heroes of bioethics?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Silence; Duty; Nothing; Meaning (existential); Power (physics); Value (mathematics); Law; Sociology; Medicine; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.1774056932164976,"score_gpt":0.56040810910649,"score_spread":0.3830024158899924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168098734","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0086498605,0.014131637,0.0013237923,0.9272879,0.00212913,0.000013324581,0.000020888192,0.000043674914,0.04639973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63476604,0.022172587,0.0050673196,0.25424805,0.0027957885,0.000052734118,0.00003745169,0.00024551756,0.0806144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880404,0.0043417686,0.00021484635,0.00082086545,0.0039905934,0.0025915876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852182,0.0064365403,0.0010150251,0.000541888,0.003469304,0.0033190916],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010216766,0.00044272802,0.0005638639,0.0012240169,0.040657006,0.015492837,0.0015333986,0.0077103535,0.0037725896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033208095,0.00044140904,0.00040823984,0.001638722,0.046561923,0.011265309,0.005004338,0.018882973,0.0007218857],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008264178,0.000030662643,0.0016212704,0.00017544586,0.000015337237,0.00069332944,0.13052249,0.00010642833,0.00039818487,0.53277624,0.26909864,0.06447922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000201669,0.000025920239,0.0024787255,0.0006538362,0.00002286018,0.0004068183,0.124358855,0.00028519647,0.0005045453,0.07933403,0.79180884,0.000100238045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6849754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72686964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99228966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040021956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07529315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63375974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168630785","doi":"10.1136/jme.2002.002204","title":"Students’ attitudes and potential behaviour to a competent patient’s request for withdrawal of treatment as they pass through a modern medical curriculum","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"University of Glasgow","keywords":"Vignette; Curriculum; Autonomy; Medical education; Psychology; Perspective (graphical); Cohort; Medicine; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.08111209571458937,"score_gpt":0.518351760212072,"score_spread":0.4372396644974826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168630785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995914,0.000020406862,0.000025557889,0.00012108188,0.0000038175012,0.000011226937,0.0000058937676,0.0000014111707,0.00021924134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988825,0.000056330544,0.000095835094,0.0001087911,0.0000061370642,0.000023269924,0.000020976842,0.0000012398978,0.00080485386],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778736,0.0006621184,0.00012451007,0.00013362823,0.000696402,0.000595908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908642,0.0017908526,0.0033463323,0.00018665081,0.0011170537,0.0026948492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034951214,0.00025350513,0.00027270164,0.0008518675,0.0010513098,0.0021596642,0.00049710664,0.0011760471,0.002634023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015007549,0.00035278584,0.00047649068,0.00036021537,0.0011048065,0.0009882085,0.0014841083,0.0016074298,0.00061698625],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003124703,0.0022015108,0.9025029,0.00009983565,0.000036520923,0.00057274074,0.06636892,0.00020699236,0.0019796656,0.00014246457,0.0010099756,0.024565961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040147534,0.003364753,0.9031388,0.000090594214,0.000025070787,0.0004907571,0.08785347,0.00055177254,0.0011319933,0.00012629446,0.0031299943,0.000056352597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005375043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008266487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005375043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001416226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016510985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018484235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169045788","doi":"10.1136/jme.2011.042374","title":"The ‘patient's physician one-step removed’: the evolving roles of medical tourism facilitators: Table 1","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Global Healthcare and Medical Tourism","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Table (database); Medical tourism; Data science; Tourism; Medicine; World Wide Web; Computer science; Data mining; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1260173989521844,"score_gpt":0.4433813667081079,"score_spread":0.3173639677559235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169045788","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20708849,0.04860934,0.009534619,0.5927499,0.008048027,0.0011001062,0.00048670577,0.00051500445,0.13186786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8352541,0.039758675,0.014742932,0.06399167,0.0010918961,0.0008719272,0.0004425257,0.00016147993,0.043684907],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99250257,0.0036755456,0.0002951479,0.00045882975,0.0012627534,0.001805054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9847039,0.0042559146,0.0008685095,0.0002561914,0.003280021,0.006635401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008902514,0.0005672405,0.00051726657,0.0013089896,0.012466227,0.00769938,0.0032221288,0.0047226525,0.012584101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014074092,0.00047496313,0.00056733785,0.0012264019,0.006996013,0.0071727247,0.008443658,0.004687579,0.0015902233],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021228004,0.00017550596,0.040889084,0.004082571,0.000053281557,0.0064481976,0.46661663,0.00030471402,0.0018917542,0.042041104,0.21377806,0.2235068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027466125,0.00016198237,0.015273772,0.003788155,0.000046708756,0.0046490417,0.49079704,0.00023814206,0.00038793607,0.004436189,0.4800831,0.00011049073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06478879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16994262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06478879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011925209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03556617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12882334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169201579","doi":"10.1136/jme.2007.023051","title":"Physicians as healthcare surrogate for terminally ill children","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terminally ill; Ambivalence; Grief; Feeling; Dilemma; Anxiety; Altruism (biology); Psychology; Health care; Moral dilemma; Palliative care; Medicine; Nursing; Social psychology; Law; Psychotherapist; Psychiatry; Political science","score_opus":0.07854023160783233,"score_gpt":0.44217310137203103,"score_spread":0.36363286976419873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169201579","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31146726,0.0321473,0.01512583,0.41326326,0.0048946,0.00022338974,0.000065230495,0.0001806295,0.22263242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9317744,0.006208873,0.0067274636,0.038696952,0.0010844325,0.000074862226,0.000021260745,0.000022990756,0.015388753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.991342,0.006685871,0.0002764318,0.0002801585,0.0007040384,0.00071159867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885225,0.006148737,0.0021330498,0.00052783993,0.00068529614,0.0019826372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00523998,0.0001750662,0.0002615801,0.0002896901,0.0059984587,0.0027769592,0.0004983095,0.005628743,0.002907273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022664262,0.0002214713,0.00023361202,0.00023075762,0.0064544994,0.0023657435,0.0035574632,0.004676923,0.0007101515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018513967,0.00019153507,0.025094442,0.000333033,0.000016640863,0.043372974,0.11079765,0.00096157857,0.002633668,0.6187297,0.12265039,0.075033225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008946917,0.00039740605,0.008113922,0.0016798868,0.000022807968,0.07729539,0.0565774,0.0010077552,0.0020404505,0.08912143,0.763569,0.000085077525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013544126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036422662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059984587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001767088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056196526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027711987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169523438","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2011-100461","title":"Ethics policy review: a case study in quality improvement","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Hamilton Health Sciences; McMaster University Medical Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Context (archaeology); Quality (philosophy); Publication; Best practice; Public relations; Health care; Process (computing); Engineering ethics; Quality management; Sociology; Political science; Business; Computer science; Engineering; Law; Marketing","score_opus":0.4424215357047506,"score_gpt":0.6902163520874726,"score_spread":0.24779481638272194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169523438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5131081,0.013560253,0.04280494,0.3307515,0.0019857264,0.004218852,0.00015525211,0.00019870402,0.09321664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.935259,0.0057409825,0.027586646,0.019138228,0.0004994532,0.0016857383,0.000049295624,0.00011956781,0.009921061],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.71623236,0.2533027,0.004795792,0.0031360614,0.012597348,0.009935729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69109386,0.25129387,0.014806923,0.0074064736,0.017998753,0.017400064],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13891023,0.00065005774,0.0010561278,0.0038922357,0.04299099,0.014117535,0.0050025503,0.015280093,0.0026241716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18976228,0.0011517364,0.001307266,0.009328441,0.021138592,0.010647918,0.013711715,0.014058042,0.0004714558],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013810012,0.001021447,0.008645564,0.001560048,0.00005732178,0.038721573,0.7118148,0.0020495092,0.0007007951,0.15600422,0.024980377,0.054306176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001201037,0.00050734513,0.004288499,0.002198411,0.00006769106,0.009177714,0.6811244,0.0027694728,0.0012517069,0.019738901,0.27859607,0.00015973231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042072073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.087776504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98471993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045304235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.062963404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7346363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171039126","doi":"10.1136/jme.2005.013672","title":"Just another drug? A philosophical assessment of randomised controlled studies on intercessory prayer","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Guelph","keywords":"Prayer; Skepticism; Causation; Epistemology; Psychology; Informed consent; Alternative medicine; Medicine; Social psychology; Law; Philosophy; Theology; Political science","score_opus":0.27866474930949114,"score_gpt":0.5590394934707538,"score_spread":0.2803747441612626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171039126","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040438518,0.9938205,0.0010649916,0.0028945373,0.00074180326,0.00043931213,0.000022336413,0.000010166,0.0006020523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035943266,0.9386101,0.010953758,0.008558334,0.001513758,0.0038738842,0.00007501141,0.000028206377,0.00044373487],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7579532,0.16970441,0.039168023,0.0057083536,0.026325587,0.0011404497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.45839363,0.5006483,0.021242341,0.006574596,0.012078172,0.0010629115],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.22271907,0.0016209655,0.0149131715,0.00713202,0.0011438989,0.0062555685,0.0052925632,0.0075536016,0.0047316514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.41119096,0.0017841334,0.0063159596,0.0076923887,0.00550025,0.007220113,0.0030151731,0.0058038966,0.0006531818],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0064159916,0.00013761921,0.0006063799,0.4162636,0.008150816,0.00016384354,0.0008084113,0.0005552289,0.00046917368,0.029509345,0.0058571002,0.53106254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016247036,0.004346798,0.004313189,0.70751387,0.03066663,0.001200451,0.0013872084,0.0017687575,0.0012145506,0.051715273,0.17939293,0.00023328222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029633557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038101715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9988561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008133244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010178518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9585258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171515846","doi":"10.1136/jme.27.3.186","title":"Doctors' authoritarianism in end-of-life treatment decisions. A comparison between Russia, Sweden and Germany","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"German; Authoritarianism; Dementia; Psychological intervention; Compliance (psychology); Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Psychology; Legal guardian; Medicine; Family medicine; Psychiatry; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Resuscitation; Disease; Emergency medicine; Democracy","score_opus":0.3071656737001744,"score_gpt":0.5114296022961546,"score_spread":0.20426392859598025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171515846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99931324,0.00018422121,0.000014924771,0.00006271202,0.000003939501,0.0000019036614,0.000008092834,4.2734032e-7,0.00041063523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99984705,0.000059399343,0.000010262586,0.00001843162,0.0000030204853,0.0000013609955,0.00001225049,3.4512908e-7,0.000047880487],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794716,0.0011794262,0.00017970892,0.00011089362,0.00031425807,0.0002684323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99204785,0.0031894294,0.0035586986,0.00017424302,0.00035039068,0.0006793745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024926174,0.00010970111,0.00017431713,0.00092413987,0.00047186343,0.0010593877,0.00016332028,0.00041016936,0.0008594512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011679813,0.00016291448,0.0002928835,0.0006575164,0.0008037431,0.0004055208,0.00075410336,0.00028277963,0.00011946318],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003716426,0.00009886897,0.98269445,0.000044668282,0.00005672745,0.0002656994,0.00882349,0.00014605632,0.00020309244,0.00027043623,0.00014022182,0.0068847258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017123983,0.00011592841,0.99205375,0.00003094596,0.000016379103,0.0003179628,0.0067283497,0.00015236612,0.00006390651,0.000050516235,0.00044622086,0.0000064455694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006710852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006236009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006710852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008599242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009365955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013343573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172097361","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2013-101891","title":"The ethics of molecular memory modification","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"SAFER; Action (physics); Computer science; Identity (music); Personal identity; Relevance (law); Duty; Engineering ethics; Cognitive science; Psychology; Computer security; Internet privacy; Social psychology; Political science; Self; Law; Engineering; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.154937551538273,"score_gpt":0.42632823031635386,"score_spread":0.2713906787780809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172097361","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02278345,0.075430565,0.06461636,0.46084133,0.007733929,0.00015099713,0.00009886705,0.00017583741,0.3681687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7038692,0.044846512,0.040805593,0.12942147,0.006113615,0.000694764,0.00008421977,0.00020243581,0.07396216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.980944,0.010841038,0.00086288527,0.0015171125,0.0050140806,0.00082092616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98060995,0.012150971,0.0010993117,0.0035013703,0.0020524417,0.0005859686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02246657,0.00037723116,0.0005988651,0.00055932294,0.0027189353,0.005117416,0.0014426578,0.00816123,0.0029549636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026755055,0.0002991468,0.00042643302,0.00032891493,0.033758137,0.0067146453,0.0040601008,0.008577939,0.0010207988],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022852757,0.000016418551,0.00013371409,0.00011215722,0.000006294724,0.00011173382,0.00080513966,0.00013958004,0.000554733,0.9702717,0.0072757634,0.020549864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016349755,0.00007057556,0.00021750602,0.00041640954,0.000013128805,0.0005500366,0.0005913365,0.00042716466,0.0024982882,0.66654134,0.32862863,0.000029295625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007136273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006501953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02246657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002692216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00410815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11881602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2187040681","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2015-102856","title":"The impact of the Rasouli decision: a Survey of Canadian intensivists","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"London Health Sciences Centre; University of British Columbia; Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus; University of Manitoba; St. Michael's Hospital; University of Ottawa; University of Alberta; Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre; St. Paul's Hospital; McMaster University; Dalhousie University; Western University; University of Toronto","funders":"Health Research Board; University Health Network","keywords":"Respondent; Medicine; Likert scale; Supreme court; Family medicine; Intensive care unit; Test (biology); Psychology; Intensive care medicine; Law","score_opus":0.4278762904471158,"score_gpt":0.539509851098783,"score_spread":0.11163356065166724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2187040681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99290574,0.00066409,0.000044905533,0.0029201966,0.00001725969,0.00008814761,0.00041719526,0.0000046631685,0.0029378294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99691224,0.00088228146,0.0001636938,0.001212875,0.000018150027,0.00003950555,0.00018770737,0.0000037432985,0.0005797309],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955408,0.00080514426,0.00025912153,0.00028044288,0.0019894794,0.0011250554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98480844,0.0035833807,0.0039547095,0.0001970835,0.0041702944,0.0032861414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043074195,0.00019919928,0.0003010302,0.0014759059,0.0043460405,0.0020438305,0.0011312271,0.0010734939,0.0020983606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019673645,0.00033835648,0.00032468897,0.0025161612,0.0020362942,0.0008067368,0.0011596251,0.0012881855,0.00021529524],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025334497,0.0002544833,0.81086755,0.0004938188,0.000055397795,0.0008201741,0.1513595,0.00018273422,0.0007834886,0.00050479907,0.008920545,0.025504248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022735872,0.00019015773,0.8454544,0.00031334985,0.000018851973,0.00027978394,0.14329638,0.00032382354,0.00014693661,0.000051802974,0.009844827,0.00005699794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9026761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9085838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097323895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027255792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026496494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19775552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2196451608","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2015-103094","title":"Physician-assisted death does not violate professional integrity","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Data science; Medicine; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.2088888907581601,"score_gpt":0.5051792118588903,"score_spread":0.29629032110073017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2196451608","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005604707,0.00094707374,0.00056379876,0.9867306,0.004737056,0.000006349178,0.000009984202,0.000018136698,0.0064266245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027363475,0.000744282,0.000604511,0.9590567,0.007838977,0.000038373582,0.000008332661,0.000035166962,0.0043101255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9495985,0.021497246,0.0031452556,0.006508385,0.013272933,0.0059776693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8805328,0.08084051,0.007563316,0.009001735,0.014098596,0.007962938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04391681,0.00063664553,0.0016945566,0.0007832891,0.012388871,0.010556474,0.0058189332,0.07416835,0.009240811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14734763,0.00082679116,0.0021973075,0.00065686443,0.04984727,0.022578318,0.01341557,0.08420154,0.0050011855],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071366,0.000059538404,0.0004247374,0.00013659628,0.000045375797,0.0007731769,0.005451157,0.000108990906,0.00015941146,0.46651152,0.5153859,0.010872156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007443354,0.00008769303,0.0004582815,0.000619216,0.00003095817,0.0011096051,0.0039939308,0.00033154423,0.0004056907,0.26279888,0.7299681,0.00012172126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058761197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007914047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07416835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006683171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009995685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23225707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2218954088","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2014-102231","title":"Implications of the concept of minimal risk in research on informed choice in clinical practice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Children’s Health Research Institute; Victoria Hospital; London Health Sciences Centre; Western University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Informed consent; Clinical Practice; Computer science; Data science; Medicine; Psychology; Alternative medicine; Family medicine; Pathology","score_opus":0.8638611850490814,"score_gpt":0.7601807271145876,"score_spread":0.10368045793449376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2218954088","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061302586,0.031167848,0.18015422,0.71127105,0.003974666,0.0011143319,0.00008803224,0.00006964289,0.06603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5376514,0.01803759,0.22709438,0.19764237,0.007864528,0.0074547217,0.000094306495,0.00014659099,0.0040141772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.36083838,0.556497,0.023687392,0.015264411,0.03896273,0.0047501456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.15164928,0.79205465,0.017352851,0.01884419,0.0146202,0.005478867],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.5121463,0.0017577334,0.0040900814,0.006089736,0.008924449,0.023923345,0.008984159,0.027496934,0.0065536667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5456245,0.0022270044,0.0034548808,0.0046141404,0.19712768,0.058656167,0.026727283,0.039924726,0.001214966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005215745,0.00003523732,0.0003130725,0.0003859893,0.000025650783,0.00012333847,0.0057698227,0.00029713218,0.000028889033,0.9845526,0.0012291041,0.0071870284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000585285,0.000055754463,0.00021161535,0.0014354486,0.000018537425,0.0001941462,0.0013501056,0.00040369705,0.000073805066,0.9856339,0.0105229,0.000041525447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035574923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028899973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5121463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028091265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048900407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60161054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2224093505","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2013-101899","title":"Challenges with participant reimbursement: experiences from a post-trial access study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reimbursement; Attendance; Clinical trial; Medicine; Health care; Randomized controlled trial; Intervention (counseling); Family medicine; Nursing; Political science","score_opus":0.46442213105109187,"score_gpt":0.5372269198119752,"score_spread":0.07280478876088337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2224093505","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5713684,0.008725223,0.023659837,0.3491014,0.004267585,0.0052179303,0.0006137763,0.00035496132,0.036690876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8585187,0.0030185534,0.013213337,0.10485238,0.0017505486,0.008728287,0.00030603292,0.0004047069,0.009207394],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.5662204,0.38250822,0.015641667,0.004620298,0.020576756,0.010432577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.47415924,0.40595183,0.028474916,0.02008287,0.034171715,0.037159476],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2994574,0.0005886189,0.0018845397,0.0011319418,0.01419892,0.013129641,0.005741173,0.011447118,0.011390899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.49529997,0.001260553,0.001936246,0.0015887659,0.010723668,0.008829084,0.01331544,0.013365155,0.0023063812],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0043534962,0.004268014,0.031429607,0.003225475,0.0004686307,0.0163674,0.63201326,0.000762289,0.0028634449,0.03158484,0.06127806,0.21138544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017945969,0.008982459,0.014871803,0.006021179,0.00034732465,0.013692591,0.44452098,0.0021392591,0.0025193633,0.034658607,0.46981043,0.000641363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029277578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043566055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70054257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006575553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021265894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86389375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2252537650","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2015-102882","title":"Assessing risk/benefit for trials using preclinical evidence: a proposal","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"MEDLINE; Medicine; Data science; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.8981951468572733,"score_gpt":0.6807278648040761,"score_spread":0.2174672820531972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2252537650","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030501122,0.0046171173,0.5596085,0.39386413,0.012162834,0.007054088,0.0004417157,0.0011580718,0.018043365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028981607,0.001685861,0.8856186,0.06022303,0.008618612,0.011755784,0.00010748828,0.00026663704,0.0027423175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.47431988,0.34554192,0.06145284,0.027821414,0.08477705,0.0060869143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.24042702,0.6310175,0.01892592,0.04412448,0.056982644,0.008522379],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6148826,0.0049494766,0.006681547,0.010276616,0.00831743,0.029151572,0.012372452,0.07748915,0.00882033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6379663,0.0044626966,0.0149171585,0.0062411316,0.08246166,0.056595165,0.019089898,0.05881003,0.006636148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003176345,0.00034083627,0.0008453061,0.0015057209,0.00024287395,0.00046200698,0.0022536337,0.0014703395,0.00056949107,0.8987076,0.036931753,0.056352936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010175699,0.00062230066,0.0007565378,0.0027042066,0.00044935255,0.00059976307,0.0005460405,0.0071340622,0.000962967,0.88612753,0.0985912,0.0004883727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001984963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016037067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3851174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010508778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03542362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47491837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254803891","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2015-103258","title":"The EU Clinical Trials Regulation: key priorities, purposes and aims and the implications for public health","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Key (lock); Public health; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Data science; Medicine; Computer security; Nursing","score_opus":0.8544462998420712,"score_gpt":0.6229923563971077,"score_spread":0.2314539434449635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254803891","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036731882,0.029709598,0.021187404,0.8905981,0.009104116,0.00017983437,0.00022506283,0.000093548086,0.045229126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14289781,0.019669987,0.053051967,0.76127636,0.010617924,0.0010488958,0.00029228532,0.00022506855,0.010919701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6663687,0.23557355,0.028269127,0.01553977,0.044709746,0.009539129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5788525,0.34317353,0.020155707,0.017081391,0.029038806,0.0116981035],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2977807,0.0011467219,0.0033290728,0.0033579713,0.005545871,0.038952198,0.005723852,0.059203666,0.0019450391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31630304,0.0015986619,0.0029921632,0.0049354294,0.039755885,0.021115713,0.012375552,0.039249994,0.0011244515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065352906,0.000041900672,0.0003298677,0.00031845924,0.000025087078,0.0001533163,0.00126987,0.00034893292,0.0002402527,0.9511369,0.03421768,0.011852411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001592705,0.00017531888,0.0014195476,0.003523178,0.000076643104,0.00048289937,0.0017177738,0.0011743982,0.0006342467,0.5663189,0.4241332,0.00018452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005513231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037019572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7022193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012496011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041599546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86596143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255285643","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2015-102966","title":"Treatment-resistant major depressive disorder and assisted dying: response to comments","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Major depressive disorder; Data science; Medicine; Psychiatry; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.2283696001221638,"score_gpt":0.48289768731028077,"score_spread":0.2545280871881169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255285643","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005495662,0.0016207711,0.00013139832,0.9071351,0.089528754,0.00005153156,0.00012111366,0.000081115846,0.0007806796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0040248297,0.0013992133,0.00019737659,0.94293565,0.04849799,0.00012883986,0.00006206515,0.00008631886,0.0026676902],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98779184,0.0036789554,0.0024389254,0.0013342451,0.0033118129,0.0014441854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9256637,0.041939426,0.006592023,0.0015256584,0.020356134,0.0039229225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013967206,0.001583838,0.001930622,0.0014305762,0.005602083,0.0048989365,0.006354769,0.05362699,0.0104165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.107333176,0.001094655,0.0025009364,0.0018380563,0.0042863456,0.0057447944,0.005559117,0.046665672,0.0056357216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050568528,0.000016036358,0.00028964426,0.0002995559,0.000016742579,0.0009481174,0.0009212828,0.000044738208,0.00012164946,0.00057618984,0.9930825,0.0036329115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007861658,0.000095418545,0.001814438,0.001397371,0.00004844277,0.0015230493,0.005742811,0.00029033524,0.00030554525,0.0010934841,0.9874752,0.00013519263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009187233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0078056385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05362699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009245981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008372955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07386649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2303551499","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2015-103048","title":"Towards a bioethics of innovation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Health and Medical Research Council","keywords":"Bioethics; Scrutiny; Biomedicine; Engineering ethics; Process (computing); Sociology; Political science; Knowledge management; Computer science; Law; Engineering; Bioinformatics","score_opus":0.1357529625334057,"score_gpt":0.43971454604418825,"score_spread":0.3039615835107825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2303551499","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00482845,0.013037039,0.08999985,0.74930996,0.0022588635,0.00016576212,0.000039145554,0.00008468537,0.1402763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6444821,0.014952978,0.11123946,0.18820217,0.008054969,0.0015497629,0.00011698676,0.00025347195,0.031148082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.85477275,0.10355013,0.00531884,0.0102500785,0.022260226,0.0038480673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8833581,0.08403471,0.006117045,0.010451994,0.010713094,0.005325149],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14090434,0.0010596784,0.0022532574,0.003670519,0.010930536,0.0257216,0.0043692947,0.03293172,0.0035992244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08411288,0.000992764,0.0016554736,0.0025932365,0.13425915,0.025273371,0.017131945,0.032313738,0.0016003522],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002335386,0.0000061298524,0.000031102896,0.000024368212,0.0000018498489,0.000009558094,0.001193211,0.000080243924,0.00003252336,0.9964743,0.0010331419,0.0011111622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010687088,0.000011764075,0.000046256828,0.00019756367,0.0000028154725,0.00003167576,0.00072858384,0.0002568208,0.000072945986,0.94567454,0.05295609,0.000010334698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029703053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016424506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14090434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015743094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039790932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7451823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2305606035","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2015-103295","title":"The ambiguous nature of epigenetic responsibility","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Race, Genetics, and Society","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Institute of Genetics","keywords":"Epigenetics; Meaning (existential); Politics; Epigenesis; Field (mathematics); Biology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Genetics; Psychology; DNA methylation; Law; Gene; Gene expression","score_opus":0.015613653159103099,"score_gpt":0.3393809866569109,"score_spread":0.3237673334978078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2305606035","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1347644,0.02497166,0.0886405,0.5251815,0.002893793,0.00006840739,0.00011458092,0.00010732362,0.22325785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9628421,0.004384469,0.007666265,0.01884085,0.0012064887,0.000059314672,0.000019600086,0.000043667835,0.004937271],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9714333,0.020088932,0.00088884076,0.0023214843,0.0042785862,0.0009888953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9800616,0.013211123,0.0016673194,0.0020863349,0.0016179461,0.0013557706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02830657,0.00030445855,0.00065537146,0.0012958582,0.0048600137,0.0059748758,0.0013122289,0.0045458116,0.0021520702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033494364,0.00032163394,0.0004190383,0.00061812194,0.07955434,0.008741536,0.0068520894,0.006518969,0.00040678226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000114619215,0.000007772265,0.0006351048,0.00003207838,0.0000049631803,0.0001135657,0.00785308,0.00011675461,0.00019594008,0.9811999,0.0012960468,0.008533323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007759032,0.000017115979,0.0009503294,0.0001322273,0.0000068526656,0.00029399063,0.0042047785,0.00028184155,0.0003051086,0.9515806,0.042197246,0.000022046584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018115193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013651502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02830657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033434408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043310556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14970124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331323766","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2015-103232","title":"Public funding of uterine transplantation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Organ and Tissue Transplantation Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Hospital admission; Retrospective cohort study; Transplantation; Emergency medicine; Medical emergency; Family medicine; Heart transplantation; Public hospital; Nursing; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.2227342448115227,"score_gpt":0.4552116930091113,"score_spread":0.2324774481975886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2331323766","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1973624,0.03327459,0.0042416058,0.38920477,0.012588824,0.0005121642,0.011744778,0.0009393547,0.3501315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90581983,0.012499382,0.0016842604,0.012016572,0.004831446,0.00040016999,0.006877657,0.00017622665,0.055694442],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99004257,0.003621889,0.00045873647,0.00024485795,0.0021136105,0.0035182158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9688233,0.009059797,0.004593734,0.002463839,0.0055178716,0.009541431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008462295,0.00024857753,0.00032120405,0.0022961632,0.0012376639,0.0041860407,0.0013681094,0.0021773693,0.051116876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03136103,0.00033608868,0.00056983833,0.0023943265,0.0013390873,0.0009710399,0.005010667,0.0020314965,0.0026223848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013585739,0.00047581148,0.12089281,0.0022928002,0.0002785989,0.003225844,0.0017827326,0.0011161951,0.0014134137,0.08343758,0.37129992,0.41242576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064544455,0.0004990438,0.23180042,0.0024880534,0.00019896265,0.005880826,0.0035825544,0.0026290913,0.00096148625,0.011515872,0.7397484,0.000049932052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012193087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011051555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051116876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00511796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026347537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17100298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342304210","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2016-103560","title":"Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Conscientious objector; Accommodation; Law; Scope (computer science); Torture; Democracy; Political science; Reasonable accommodation; Liberal democracy; Sociology; Medicine; Human rights; Politics; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07287488935834395,"score_gpt":0.42938051980853237,"score_spread":0.3565056304501884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2342304210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52458704,0.00083650864,0.007984348,0.16327775,0.0005213474,0.000106414765,0.00002564525,0.00010570401,0.30255517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98543453,0.00008808316,0.0005399181,0.010416408,0.0001349049,0.000038005972,0.0000054208863,0.00002015314,0.0033226216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9779474,0.011313541,0.0009350354,0.0017529833,0.0034721484,0.004578889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96315634,0.02320418,0.0041804872,0.003702446,0.0016814594,0.004075111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019799372,0.00025496777,0.0007034896,0.0018858704,0.014211533,0.010220799,0.0010285376,0.011787986,0.0071254927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064937904,0.0007248503,0.00070370716,0.001095333,0.056820687,0.0066969194,0.01210124,0.011832986,0.0013030457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001253198,0.0001561276,0.009913349,0.00006652277,0.000025742747,0.0023417368,0.07702623,0.00021630123,0.00092968316,0.89088404,0.0077443575,0.010570532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002014314,0.000077255325,0.008145863,0.000356411,0.000021421441,0.002396713,0.039452158,0.0011426168,0.00083663233,0.87765545,0.06963135,0.000082657105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033669884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034474814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019799372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037826265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038686616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10471028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516475011","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2016-103573","title":"‘Wicked problems’, community engagement and the need for an implementation science for research ethics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Wicked problem; Context (archaeology); Politics; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Social issues; Sociology; Ethical issues; Research ethics; Variety (cybernetics); Engineering ethics; Public relations; Management science; Computer science; Political science; Medicine; Law; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.9575289498321614,"score_gpt":0.8089739082075317,"score_spread":0.14855504162462974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2516475011","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004103046,0.03466896,0.15852076,0.73519737,0.0053435955,0.000716883,0.00006606003,0.00016006504,0.0612232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5097385,0.025969073,0.18929145,0.24866235,0.011089062,0.005921596,0.00016153019,0.0004356632,0.008730819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.49900338,0.43594596,0.010343144,0.015401542,0.032768033,0.0065380433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4835693,0.44930467,0.010516818,0.02819777,0.017254677,0.011156703],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.37124535,0.0020856408,0.0054111457,0.005872271,0.01536749,0.0374125,0.0070110755,0.029152004,0.00529634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.287414,0.0018983814,0.0020846345,0.0056928205,0.22750275,0.053562038,0.028970942,0.05025826,0.0013463226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001304908,0.000027077596,0.00012599923,0.00023382776,0.000015511647,0.000039395865,0.0055611786,0.00023317728,0.000023243296,0.98434055,0.003808189,0.005578745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026938395,0.00003580242,0.000062517094,0.0007078814,0.000004851892,0.000050013008,0.0017125863,0.00048719233,0.000049859093,0.96680295,0.03003063,0.000028685974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005746243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031436277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6287546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021191824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049141113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7753664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517489914","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2016-103565","title":"‘Spiritual care is not the hospital's business’: a qualitative study on the perspectives of patients about the integration of spirituality in healthcare settings","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Spirituality; Health care; Qualitative research; Spiritual care; Medicine; Nursing; Sociology; Alternative medicine; Political science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.09495958628904612,"score_gpt":0.47481512034013384,"score_spread":0.37985553405108774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517489914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98905027,0.00091106654,0.0012991033,0.005193453,0.00008696729,0.00012390876,0.00009572773,0.000014216638,0.003225285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966658,0.0005562961,0.00042309074,0.0012397566,0.000021387074,0.000103714236,0.000029788936,0.000014245885,0.0009459121],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9839378,0.013511446,0.00031069806,0.00044694205,0.00055339973,0.0012397405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9763307,0.018383998,0.001476919,0.00042711603,0.0010830854,0.0022980843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014836163,0.00057287986,0.00091523567,0.0011717622,0.00878602,0.0043237456,0.0015566539,0.0022049022,0.003048816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01908419,0.00071466254,0.00047921,0.001325617,0.01061404,0.0055379085,0.004675066,0.0043526236,0.0003063421],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027689124,0.000032355136,0.0012114672,0.000078473204,0.0000035720393,0.0005244465,0.99544215,0.000016941234,0.00035035846,0.00054239674,0.0003296298,0.0014404706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044414987,0.000044381562,0.0005997591,0.00008037566,0.0000030820072,0.00023467011,0.995235,0.000029489252,0.00011435348,0.00014221766,0.003503848,0.000008419429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054763416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010150045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014836163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045294743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048677316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078462064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525580804","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2016-103903","title":"Selling conscience short: a response to Schuklenk and Smalling on conscientious objections by medical professionals","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Sincerity; Conscientious objector; Law; Norm (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13183286642847597,"score_gpt":0.552900138670184,"score_spread":0.421067272241708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525580804","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001291305,0.001362352,0.0002446983,0.9929294,0.0024416915,0.000005477567,0.0000075831363,0.000014018973,0.0017035606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03046731,0.0011974503,0.00034360294,0.95996004,0.0058332635,0.000039565806,0.0000067401174,0.000047558275,0.0021044216],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.963274,0.020150978,0.0020899586,0.0046950313,0.0070268856,0.002763248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80570316,0.17096305,0.0052067395,0.0031107385,0.009161742,0.0058546416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032861635,0.0012203669,0.0019477097,0.0018031431,0.015090824,0.011304131,0.0061424077,0.07581119,0.0045693964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11003711,0.0010707241,0.0020300855,0.0018325382,0.045934632,0.02007814,0.0083827395,0.09243945,0.0013926977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013788705,0.00008948468,0.0007594391,0.00019829108,0.000032497595,0.002161707,0.03359293,0.00020566536,0.0005044766,0.21884328,0.7305632,0.0129111465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020720964,0.00015421028,0.0012808029,0.0014071563,0.00005423289,0.001791405,0.04501876,0.001254196,0.0012691048,0.18551375,0.7616141,0.00043507153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01226726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009619123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07581119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010081322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008656576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17379099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531176831","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2016-103683","title":"Feasibility of conducting prospective observational research on critically ill, dying patients in the intensive care unit","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University Health Centre; University of Ottawa; McGill University; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Observational study; Intensive care unit; Informed consent; Organ donation; Critically ill; Medicine; Research ethics; Population; Intensive care; Protocol (science); Intensive care medicine; MEDLINE; Life support; Nursing; Alternative medicine; Transplantation; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.7650635053622039,"score_gpt":0.6127096864882046,"score_spread":0.15235381887399935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531176831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50303507,0.002080649,0.058538828,0.008648636,0.0010502507,0.40468013,0.0021491477,0.00011440046,0.019702828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55005115,0.00090938894,0.08005703,0.003979102,0.00044423228,0.36282703,0.00065298914,0.000029346407,0.0010497076],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.5509686,0.39439622,0.0286055,0.005186078,0.016119674,0.004723939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5733852,0.26550728,0.038238917,0.067048654,0.043233957,0.012586006],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.33004096,0.0007848024,0.0014837579,0.0020969573,0.004582074,0.0048674056,0.0021403593,0.002429113,0.004251786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32675824,0.0017578086,0.0012819073,0.002917217,0.0044588046,0.004601943,0.0028399427,0.0020832533,0.001257392],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.025545396,0.02275153,0.6467501,0.00809925,0.001127325,0.002364708,0.071666606,0.0024113848,0.00785451,0.020447481,0.008739677,0.18224205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.023735603,0.09036462,0.6338405,0.012027294,0.0010916364,0.0025613059,0.07783262,0.00907319,0.0067316676,0.015596823,0.12648508,0.00065962697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043988284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011242945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66995907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026855154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029991554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8261788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2541159367","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2016-103883","title":"Against the accommodation of subjective healthcare provider beliefs in medicine: counteracting supporters of conscientious objector accommodation arguments","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Conscientious objector; Accommodation; Context (archaeology); Ideology; Reasonable accommodation; Law; Medicine; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.11843766615760935,"score_gpt":0.5187173455133013,"score_spread":0.4002796793556919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2541159367","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42077342,0.0012238979,0.04463283,0.3752517,0.0017661551,0.00028607016,0.000039696784,0.00017853863,0.15584767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755706,0.00013388215,0.002751555,0.01941351,0.00044578122,0.00008945203,0.0000067789338,0.000031144664,0.0015571726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9253286,0.045984995,0.0034587386,0.0046169125,0.016671883,0.003938929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.73953605,0.19137716,0.030600164,0.020636003,0.012449025,0.0054015713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07948544,0.0007751291,0.00091937406,0.003166718,0.0077632684,0.008638447,0.004163062,0.014354331,0.0031796577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23693827,0.0006950864,0.0010885363,0.0015361651,0.060944345,0.008754264,0.0118360985,0.02318786,0.00045093067],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033893948,0.00017369853,0.013101235,0.00023109202,0.00013297788,0.0022337327,0.16288555,0.00042628223,0.0014022677,0.7920295,0.0065100496,0.020534698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005200561,0.0003130602,0.017919509,0.001419236,0.00022424734,0.0025799072,0.105072014,0.0071091917,0.004655306,0.77300155,0.086862065,0.00032392045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006747942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004439072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07948544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056591276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005464533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4203642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2552650277","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2016-103564","title":"Parents perspectives on whole genome sequencing for their children: qualified enthusiasm?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Genomics and Rare Diseases","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St Joseph's Health Centre; St. Michael's Hospital; University of Toronto; SickKids Foundation; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital; Hospital for Sick Children","funders":"Hospital for Sick Children","keywords":"Enthusiasm; Exome sequencing; Ambivalence; Obligation; Qualitative research; Medical genetics; Psychology; Medicine; Test (biology); Dyad; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Genetics","score_opus":0.03587551244528292,"score_gpt":0.3285380107046888,"score_spread":0.2926624982594059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2552650277","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8966006,0.0069476394,0.0031030527,0.07529974,0.0009993819,0.00005964888,0.000115428316,0.000050314346,0.016824266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904855,0.0013833941,0.00042891203,0.0067029786,0.000098525474,0.000042325923,0.000029224124,0.000019646548,0.0008095574],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97840583,0.017307563,0.00046726226,0.0006725949,0.0016684472,0.0014783117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96549225,0.024462325,0.0040210597,0.0007793709,0.00211809,0.003126867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018767528,0.00040890038,0.00054855295,0.00056762237,0.006355721,0.0053789574,0.0009796536,0.003137045,0.003078497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04456484,0.00056513265,0.0005322219,0.0007222659,0.009935034,0.0048796367,0.004501791,0.0054918546,0.00035960393],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004367873,0.000025000887,0.012814989,0.00015389701,0.000018651745,0.0023199536,0.96933436,0.00003515138,0.00042180368,0.003320747,0.003072147,0.008439595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008940599,0.00007147921,0.0044267057,0.0002844724,0.000015381158,0.001762738,0.97368455,0.00004276996,0.00015515747,0.0009757689,0.01854784,0.000024187506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004205098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018767528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036263173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033081213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0992533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557938468","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2016-103658","title":"Highlights in bioethics through 40 years: a quantitative analysis of top-cited journal articles","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Publishing; Mainstream; Bibliometrics; Social science; Medicine; Political science; Library science; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.311173576527714,"score_gpt":0.5307679666370625,"score_spread":0.2195943901093485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2557938468","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9187326,0.021256492,0.0040429104,0.0028504056,0.000363238,0.0020578601,0.04153855,0.00023568227,0.0089221755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9551098,0.008512008,0.012475846,0.00073636626,0.0004639695,0.0047837645,0.01545488,0.00014238259,0.0023209963],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9744099,0.004995891,0.008644766,0.0022070492,0.008756642,0.0009857495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.72867024,0.16577713,0.056903664,0.0033265816,0.040831212,0.004491116],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022935353,0.0005843238,0.0013442802,0.05352037,0.0012337604,0.0051035723,0.0015708341,0.00095681654,0.0047719376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13304545,0.00041413784,0.0015914319,0.054184817,0.0011512926,0.0053951913,0.0030509268,0.000822082,0.0010360423],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013132644,0.00028170962,0.7833285,0.03542556,0.0022831336,0.0011314247,0.030879287,0.0005005984,0.003917561,0.0029185296,0.012763554,0.12525691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012382629,0.0005806702,0.8896787,0.006929742,0.0014487345,0.0017714222,0.04766857,0.0012450094,0.0019042729,0.0026830363,0.045792636,0.00017336824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021968454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034622685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97706467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022223757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003147976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.121295154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2567676032","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2016-103460","title":"Organ donation after medical assistance in dying or cessation of life-sustaining treatment requested by conscious patients: the Canadian context","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal; Hôpital Notre-Dame; Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé","keywords":"Organ donation; Legislation; Context (archaeology); Donation; Autonomy; Government (linguistics); Supreme court; Tissue Donation; Medicine; Law; Political science; Surgery; Transplantation; History","score_opus":0.03134519623218251,"score_gpt":0.32839974285809664,"score_spread":0.29705454662591413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2567676032","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20541324,0.070209615,0.0012074744,0.54098666,0.0025540534,0.00018969826,0.0007308335,0.000039052964,0.1786694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8203356,0.056355137,0.0016960462,0.1100785,0.0009140779,0.00005842435,0.0002197774,0.000055573833,0.010286801],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99173075,0.0013316913,0.00030167674,0.0005236552,0.0023941724,0.003718082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98428255,0.0037952769,0.0014398632,0.00026217857,0.0037020333,0.006518099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004996876,0.0004135737,0.00051662006,0.0018581075,0.029260738,0.007241729,0.0028498622,0.0053026974,0.004499866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016812686,0.0004376161,0.0005753664,0.0046603736,0.015619284,0.0018544401,0.004929165,0.0094353445,0.00022042323],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003066296,0.00032317013,0.061737128,0.0015867507,0.0001355005,0.032642942,0.091205485,0.00131665,0.0013716083,0.5026585,0.19138083,0.11533491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001144584,0.00010853862,0.100845836,0.0039846795,0.00017360525,0.0144650005,0.13400167,0.00095451897,0.00059668074,0.029184006,0.7148963,0.0006746709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98987246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14947626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14947626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28735614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.986487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2583077528","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2016-103933","title":"Appealing to the crowd: ethical justifications in Canadian medical crowdfunding campaigns","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Michael Smith Health Research BC","keywords":"Appeal; Public relations; Medical ethics; Political science; Visibility; Ethical issues; Internet privacy; Law; Engineering ethics","score_opus":0.23266069456961855,"score_gpt":0.4499635552232082,"score_spread":0.21730286065358964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2583077528","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022834856,0.91282463,0.0009723441,0.030450467,0.00067219604,0.00017910147,0.00012659686,0.000017761982,0.03192202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27498716,0.7120811,0.0014817446,0.008468086,0.00043056541,0.00012907025,0.000101274105,0.000021956774,0.0022990014],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97463554,0.012440012,0.0013977387,0.00063933234,0.009767951,0.0011195134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9428039,0.041009318,0.007094694,0.00062931946,0.0073206853,0.0011420869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019739836,0.0005684253,0.0009557797,0.0047156247,0.0037938643,0.00651162,0.001301289,0.0025965243,0.0025793852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05697842,0.0003107521,0.0007827664,0.0071508116,0.006855657,0.0027012855,0.0028171812,0.0032214827,0.00019175958],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019627844,0.000102939455,0.009492774,0.047037102,0.00053463015,0.001585656,0.056259878,0.00045046996,0.00047025873,0.0671385,0.04088092,0.77585053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000699486,0.000086671454,0.030022623,0.11626842,0.0009649588,0.0018197653,0.041861698,0.00035540547,0.000785608,0.015572425,0.7919884,0.0002040447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21530725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41701365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9807774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01922264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05108438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42810804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589568442","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2015-102896","title":"Ethical questions identified in a study of local and expatriate responders’ perspectives of vulnerability in the 2010 Haiti earthquake","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Disaster Response and Management","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation; Toronto Rehabilitation Institute; University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; McGill University","keywords":"Expatriate; Vulnerability (computing); Humanitarian aid; Psychological intervention; Public relations; Equity (law); Political science; Medicine; Sociology; Psychology; Nursing; Law; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.17835940578444268,"score_gpt":0.5312705270906467,"score_spread":0.35291112130620406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589568442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9585688,0.00086483045,0.0034978953,0.026512086,0.00031926608,0.0005488766,0.000060596314,0.000021706655,0.009605902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887686,0.00077318586,0.0016180641,0.0058052023,0.0000851007,0.00081912306,0.000028363047,0.000025180248,0.0020772093],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8706553,0.11692946,0.0023799164,0.0020129497,0.0038689987,0.004153404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7864593,0.17456618,0.014082851,0.0036975606,0.014429162,0.006764848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.082492895,0.0009424957,0.0010014041,0.0023982315,0.027592363,0.010870904,0.003090513,0.0068354732,0.0023386555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13276443,0.0010674862,0.00060358626,0.0021865426,0.033513606,0.007396514,0.014296932,0.009493208,0.00033724477],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012165216,0.000014197089,0.0006755351,0.00005125588,0.0000018064674,0.00032433786,0.99681133,0.000014291827,0.00008083192,0.00077489566,0.00038174997,0.00085753953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015316854,0.000008516845,0.00025863948,0.000059474147,0.0000010396668,0.00007333376,0.9973174,0.000018183517,0.000033759254,0.00023320026,0.0019893702,0.000005522422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008115023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013890134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082492895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010107047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016610578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43626934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593221545","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2016-103990","title":"The ethics of betel nut consumption in Taiwan","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Oral Health Pathology and Treatment","field":"Dentistry","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Betel; Nut; Popularity; Consumption (sociology); Bioethics; Traditional medicine; Environmental health; Social science; Medicine; Political science; Sociology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.18084769769240597,"score_gpt":0.5007032012576632,"score_spread":0.31985550356525727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593221545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9150596,0.007182339,0.0010573895,0.0376507,0.00012550609,0.000032371252,0.000012643672,0.000006396249,0.038873035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99391454,0.0014544853,0.00027265726,0.0013185422,0.00005633446,0.000014312604,0.000005585367,0.0000015253709,0.0029620412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986442,0.0008750993,0.00008442259,0.000053919783,0.00015651698,0.00018583307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978846,0.0012552907,0.00041337495,0.00010493443,0.00012198814,0.00021987033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018041615,0.00008588993,0.000101825295,0.00029583834,0.0022755251,0.001833114,0.000224254,0.0017585777,0.0005548664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036108696,0.00010858573,0.000115032046,0.0004264196,0.0050296877,0.00057607394,0.0013450908,0.0012804071,0.000056657093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023340865,0.00029397034,0.116936505,0.00044695483,0.00005702778,0.020580526,0.23586604,0.0017029777,0.0103326095,0.49938065,0.010945411,0.103223965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090462076,0.0006856061,0.22378425,0.0021680968,0.00010194376,0.014185395,0.20463394,0.007273336,0.006289864,0.16042523,0.38013732,0.0002246417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009182511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010542951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009182511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002833637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049834396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02055955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2600564521","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2016-103414","title":"Undue inducement: a case study in CAPRISA 008","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"Tides Foundation; United States Agency for International Development","keywords":"Deception; Reimbursement; Clinical trial; Undue influence; Informed consent; Health care; Medicine; Unintended consequences; Internet privacy; Business; Family medicine; Psychology; Alternative medicine; Computer science; Social psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.8079533733801705,"score_gpt":0.7131824891465726,"score_spread":0.09477088423359792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2600564521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85855,0.004281112,0.011669365,0.055341695,0.0010640409,0.0018213127,0.00025537968,0.00016439783,0.066852696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96561027,0.0026088099,0.008886071,0.0112268925,0.0005226609,0.0009397929,0.000085340034,0.00009955875,0.010020495],"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"case_report","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821529,0.0118812835,0.00080047635,0.0011846408,0.0021449497,0.0018357885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9661797,0.021209342,0.0036823542,0.002161215,0.0019165692,0.004850867],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014416945,0.0012365291,0.0009465845,0.0016847765,0.014252455,0.004372642,0.0027504012,0.009661548,0.0051714317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048907213,0.000840953,0.0014182945,0.0013602414,0.0055163405,0.0028781646,0.00438288,0.008364463,0.00082974765],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":"case_report","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005885542,0.0019977903,0.0393629,0.0007391447,0.00010077588,0.7615115,0.10031663,0.0004921676,0.0009871781,0.037915193,0.015840873,0.04014732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014159385,0.0015565634,0.014712277,0.0018094539,0.00013337217,0.7612477,0.11299891,0.0022878759,0.0024058984,0.018025208,0.08444834,0.00023277763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008505723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014693696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99033844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004418487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064537716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07624501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2614570756","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2016-103988","title":"Allocation of antiretroviral drugs to HIV-infected patients in Togo: perspectives of people living with HIV and healthcare providers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université TÉLUQ; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Guideline; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Antiretroviral treatment; Health care; Antiretroviral therapy; Family medicine; Developing country; Viral load; Pathology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.02597156965125983,"score_gpt":0.38458518288270843,"score_spread":0.3586136132314486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2614570756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893673,0.00094405934,0.00008033884,0.00673269,0.000052641994,0.000019548756,0.000026560838,0.0000020744305,0.0027747948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965649,0.00081478694,0.00009304316,0.002055712,0.000024885217,0.00001438076,0.000014348418,0.0000018010261,0.00041618443],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996351,0.0025279068,0.00009379785,0.000095708165,0.00021955295,0.0007120765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956383,0.0016368845,0.0010586063,0.000064288986,0.0002934635,0.0013084802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027559104,0.00034548927,0.00036044038,0.0006790561,0.007420769,0.00382264,0.00068985077,0.00190897,0.0025858532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006533871,0.00037820337,0.0003961973,0.00059018674,0.0046310215,0.002680463,0.0041007684,0.0031918974,0.00021015263],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001388011,0.00013885592,0.062148426,0.00023657654,0.0000394216,0.0020902709,0.92316985,0.000046726396,0.0006658073,0.0009332784,0.0019591723,0.008432967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010793979,0.00008105658,0.009633478,0.000116731055,0.000010658472,0.00051021925,0.98635477,0.000035432382,0.00006269029,0.0001690873,0.003003648,0.000011486799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013613573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027970258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013613573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032331436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031483981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027068675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2741150117","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2016-103531","title":"Ethics consultation in paediatric and adult emergency departments: an assessment of clinical, ethical, learning and resource needs","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton; Hamilton Health Sciences; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Medicine; Nursing; Needs assessment; Clinical Ethics; Resource (disambiguation); Research ethics; Medical education; Psychology; Psychiatry; Sociology; Engineering ethics","score_opus":0.21789874622187824,"score_gpt":0.6455575433712208,"score_spread":0.42765879714934263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2741150117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997503,0.00035478183,0.00013558198,0.0009456568,0.000008056355,0.000062583604,0.000045098906,0.0000041229064,0.000941218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99865484,0.00035465535,0.0005020768,0.00016149279,0.000011974013,0.00009008646,0.000045707093,0.0000016686178,0.00017754994],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99361116,0.0033125356,0.00079538126,0.00018772349,0.0012076065,0.0008855933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97971755,0.0062032226,0.007568045,0.00026829296,0.0025273869,0.0037154434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008508901,0.00019074677,0.00031313693,0.0013796575,0.0011305894,0.0011660341,0.00055784284,0.0008742423,0.0017867388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025543697,0.00033303103,0.00029569087,0.0010487755,0.0010332238,0.002266232,0.0029279648,0.0011040869,0.00026913098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002170335,0.0006157542,0.88969195,0.00071774743,0.000047003174,0.0017889546,0.06805436,0.00025694366,0.00047362092,0.00047330032,0.0025300563,0.03513335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028541956,0.0006659398,0.8795099,0.0003403569,0.00001743564,0.0033551152,0.10865366,0.0006181149,0.00030221447,0.00038373884,0.0060912776,0.000033687364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016811306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037584512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008508901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020584222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003859015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044999957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742315259","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2016-103726","title":"Voluntary sterilisation and access to IVF in Québec","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Langara College","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Health care; Value (mathematics); Law; Business; Political science; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.18590514038772013,"score_gpt":0.5011085386438672,"score_spread":0.31520339825614707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2742315259","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12334361,0.019779703,0.0021008207,0.39024502,0.0013004321,0.00011337407,0.0010088797,0.00007062297,0.46203762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.874777,0.0046982043,0.0009018221,0.060376212,0.000382748,0.00005833041,0.000242463,0.0000313682,0.058531888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99553055,0.0010939535,0.0001469044,0.00024956508,0.0012063629,0.0017726315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914984,0.0033244607,0.00063604594,0.0003140196,0.0025815147,0.0016456025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037473137,0.00017882632,0.0002499805,0.0006176502,0.009127242,0.0040808716,0.0015119417,0.003431099,0.010667698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009894429,0.00025883008,0.00046396794,0.00095979025,0.005911584,0.0010638564,0.0019798053,0.0037695768,0.00028783153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001858976,0.0000902383,0.025349235,0.0002680285,0.000064877866,0.001502774,0.009689844,0.0013758026,0.0006615504,0.7508996,0.15467957,0.055232573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018713824,0.00013094653,0.11099122,0.0014910552,0.00012986903,0.0010869063,0.009751488,0.00296222,0.00078849815,0.05419644,0.81803954,0.0002447213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9864912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9932869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06472022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06472022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11179185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4695803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2749043457","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2017-104253","title":"Disabling disability amid competing ideologies","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Transhumanism; Individualism; Epistemology; Sociology; Ethos; Flourishing; Ideology; Argument (complex analysis); Methodological individualism; Environmental ethics; Psychology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Politics; Social psychology; Biology","score_opus":0.2853210443716987,"score_gpt":0.4784336158371248,"score_spread":0.1931125714654261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2749043457","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05155903,0.041559543,0.007983303,0.32459867,0.004965646,0.0000525195,0.00007830623,0.00004451983,0.56915843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8732294,0.022315878,0.003705882,0.064697236,0.008238969,0.0002286734,0.0000741909,0.00006814947,0.027441626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955454,0.0016197998,0.0002392981,0.0004472767,0.0012935727,0.00085463346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996381,0.0020379885,0.0002503511,0.00018442383,0.0005338384,0.0006124721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071004382,0.00048680985,0.0006696635,0.0025827535,0.0048313355,0.0072789923,0.0014555895,0.006851616,0.0028557056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006981466,0.00016359569,0.0004011574,0.0008474467,0.0374748,0.0055467444,0.008099321,0.007884901,0.00049112295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018063936,0.000018742277,0.00038881207,0.00006311743,0.0000042648317,0.000651787,0.0046982826,0.00010295226,0.000064251864,0.9750329,0.006072186,0.012884574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002230485,0.000034999746,0.00057487015,0.00070723216,0.000012058652,0.002228478,0.009231962,0.00016203533,0.00013260767,0.84666663,0.14020419,0.000022637309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016214456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031277554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072789923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037144807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00406927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037551105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789758196","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2017-104203","title":"Making medical decisions for an incompetent older adult when both a proxy and an advance directive are available: which is more likely to reflect the older adult’s preferences?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Health and Social Services Centre University Institute of Geriatrics of Sherbrooke; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Institute of Aging; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Directive; Proxy (statistics); Psychology; Computer science; Data science","score_opus":0.2389996302776031,"score_gpt":0.5113238609289056,"score_spread":0.2723242306513025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789758196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954704,0.0008235551,0.0010423146,0.0007584829,0.000015538026,0.000039496485,0.00026335573,0.000008063781,0.0015788155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979201,0.00045337158,0.0010829761,0.00016468615,0.000023119446,0.000025325842,0.00023647664,0.000002981344,0.00009113317],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.990537,0.00592031,0.0013049742,0.00057243276,0.0013103248,0.00035501522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92854506,0.039763838,0.02341789,0.0021537463,0.0046162633,0.001503084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008583587,0.00032828367,0.00059344934,0.002594427,0.00044191632,0.0019688527,0.00054607604,0.0014509251,0.0021005054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10587604,0.00036691982,0.0008063575,0.0016494871,0.000810872,0.0020722027,0.0011674528,0.00080341654,0.00044416712],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041397513,0.00011770586,0.964534,0.00030619922,0.00016072413,0.0004892065,0.0050644637,0.00029153214,0.00029496668,0.00012667727,0.0003300595,0.02787042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067046916,0.0005535714,0.9651195,0.0008635974,0.00024265317,0.0034547702,0.023032362,0.0032951487,0.0006645448,0.0011011014,0.0015249274,0.00008083484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020057638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038754996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008583587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046569624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069829857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045394897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793444251","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2017-104555","title":"Cerebral organoids: ethical issues and consciousness assessment","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":206,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; James S. McDonnell Foundation","keywords":"Organoid; Neuroscience; Consciousness; Human brain; Computer science; Biology; Cognitive science; Computational biology; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.10077081983951737,"score_gpt":0.4506170804688237,"score_spread":0.34984626062930635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793444251","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07926811,0.05265305,0.146555,0.52946895,0.008111483,0.0012197264,0.0005913869,0.00031913797,0.18181318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78501034,0.030889463,0.07144818,0.08393868,0.0037887157,0.0033608216,0.0005149823,0.00029454028,0.020754298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9575537,0.027167475,0.0024084523,0.0012561028,0.010307475,0.0013067918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9188858,0.05588491,0.0060472246,0.0061705657,0.010216415,0.0027950404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.056032035,0.0004695215,0.00063745485,0.0014890905,0.003260566,0.006299864,0.0017615058,0.005772103,0.004033907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12284966,0.0003355751,0.0008180595,0.0010167462,0.011054303,0.004326019,0.0059488667,0.006837528,0.0010750557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032866845,0.000109696084,0.0072731497,0.0007837735,0.00011549028,0.0031078986,0.011253748,0.0012715962,0.002241523,0.55225307,0.099393256,0.3218681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095744675,0.00033638775,0.0049233255,0.0035465255,0.00019513388,0.010722334,0.012722441,0.0027619945,0.007673455,0.44383043,0.5130067,0.00018565016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015889936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001934577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056032035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004342652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007512518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29632926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794010106","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2016-104066","title":"Disability discrimination and misdirected criticism of the quality-adjusted life year framework","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; Simon Fraser University; Vancouver Coastal Health","funders":"University of Birmingham","keywords":"Criticism; Value (mathematics); Value of life; Preference; Quality of life (healthcare); Quality-adjusted life year; Health economics; Positive economics; Psychology; Revealed preference; Quality (philosophy); Sociology; Social psychology; Actuarial science; Health care; Economics; Law; Epistemology; Cost–benefit analysis; Political science; Microeconomics; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.4921750030962723,"score_gpt":0.5116655197931035,"score_spread":0.01949051669683116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794010106","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00076338893,0.0011381423,0.0005433236,0.9907652,0.0029341306,0.0000064141564,0.000019794239,0.000012269899,0.0038172596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020911956,0.0008276481,0.0010566416,0.96220756,0.011593781,0.000049299935,0.00001984302,0.000040481533,0.003292794],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95688295,0.022183498,0.003173917,0.00411652,0.011497858,0.0021453851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8918329,0.0884324,0.0025829216,0.0039674966,0.010043123,0.0031411455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.053324778,0.0007538469,0.0016958266,0.0013689096,0.0055868914,0.007023555,0.004356618,0.052779716,0.003593343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11672901,0.000805129,0.0021416945,0.0015096003,0.023297979,0.010420855,0.005522614,0.08198277,0.0025874204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011343074,0.00008806329,0.0012608531,0.000118580676,0.000026756778,0.0006992368,0.0030306103,0.00030172107,0.00026268614,0.39032674,0.56751496,0.03625647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017391525,0.00009409659,0.0021487775,0.0008618199,0.0000319792,0.001306768,0.0015359601,0.0016070134,0.0004408139,0.24757984,0.74406874,0.00015031057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011365427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011933634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053324778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009779405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009401944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28201175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802761848","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2017-104282","title":"Thinking clearly about the FIRST trial: addressing ethical challenges in cluster randomised trials of policy interventions involving health providers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Hospital Admissions and Outcomes","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Research ethics; Psychological intervention; Harm; Health care; Beneficence; Informed consent; Cluster randomised controlled trial; Medicine; Clinical equipoise; Clinical trial; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Nursing; Psychology; Alternative medicine; Political science; Law; Psychiatry; Autonomy","score_opus":0.33791501756793874,"score_gpt":0.510305597031566,"score_spread":0.17239057946362724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802761848","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004699076,0.03156499,0.23610453,0.6752942,0.02386481,0.01950516,0.00024217632,0.0003360926,0.008389001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.080672644,0.008245643,0.55837876,0.27905247,0.010455056,0.060633,0.00010496453,0.00036201937,0.0020954313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.067038625,0.87610227,0.02698074,0.008316543,0.019848695,0.0017132574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.044122886,0.88133645,0.02455214,0.03272655,0.014645387,0.0026165668],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8198916,0.0026573667,0.009065403,0.0055665057,0.009996993,0.031196263,0.010529265,0.050276898,0.0041002133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.88991994,0.004437507,0.0074180784,0.00586874,0.0676013,0.030072883,0.012138241,0.0550272,0.0023622303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0048179985,0.00034239254,0.002145116,0.028920842,0.0032987748,0.0013111999,0.056713343,0.0045075836,0.0010543194,0.6786998,0.08275702,0.13543159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041935313,0.0013359981,0.000979744,0.042904675,0.0010910444,0.0008769731,0.005393508,0.009236021,0.0016682385,0.80543965,0.1262631,0.00061750563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033434026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060730274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18010843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018469809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07904079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2221058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804243785","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2017-104479","title":"Duty to provide care to Ebola patients: the perspectives of Guinean lay people and healthcare providers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université TÉLUQ; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Division of Materials Research; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Duty; Obligation; Health care; Family medicine; Nursing; Health professionals; Duty of care; Medicine; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03881658770516298,"score_gpt":0.4187481287003875,"score_spread":0.3799315409952245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804243785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900771,0.0006606977,0.00018334074,0.005615856,0.00006196286,0.00003185866,0.000019387122,0.0000018592679,0.0033478893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976,0.0004868871,0.00014229916,0.001439911,0.000020536418,0.000017320152,0.000007092696,0.0000013040732,0.0002845982],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99499893,0.0036419847,0.00015820866,0.00012912024,0.00040354463,0.0006681975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99191624,0.00471824,0.0015282542,0.00021373591,0.0006371179,0.0009864304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007654482,0.0003554964,0.00034547297,0.00067513343,0.007582184,0.0036529205,0.000569292,0.0021551289,0.0031571996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0150207,0.00045948083,0.000303052,0.0003782088,0.0067688986,0.00194638,0.0034908592,0.0030530423,0.00019836493],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001117852,0.00007942716,0.055676077,0.00019352068,0.000029434585,0.0018989353,0.9309121,0.00007993226,0.0011963963,0.0011013697,0.0012982449,0.0074229143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005883858,0.000059652724,0.0070835785,0.00019068731,0.000005658656,0.00057556963,0.988988,0.000051441817,0.00006558102,0.00018511999,0.0027779841,0.000010917743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014403542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015539233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014403542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026254933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032623534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04048127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804658933","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2018-104860","title":"‘No’ to lesbian motherhood using human nuclear genome transfer","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Race, Genetics, and Society","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Mistake; Lesbian; Argument (complex analysis); Appeal; Human rights; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Biology; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.043724502844390056,"score_gpt":0.3368103271612359,"score_spread":0.2930858243168458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804658933","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018611993,0.0019157401,0.0001273407,0.98410565,0.0036873736,0.000007999801,0.000007297919,0.000012478585,0.008274991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015332321,0.0007828586,0.00012136591,0.9713054,0.0049372623,0.000018503488,0.0000044712683,0.000014874125,0.007483062],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99528116,0.0024858853,0.00029364962,0.0004437287,0.0007823442,0.00071316614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99426407,0.004076054,0.00039040396,0.00021594703,0.0004193423,0.00063419633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049351812,0.00056148757,0.0008514917,0.00034793923,0.0063610836,0.0031116223,0.001452427,0.059116416,0.0038944357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019792596,0.00058488094,0.0007572781,0.00035187477,0.006479181,0.004383377,0.002437428,0.03925084,0.0024028325],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013630149,0.00011464324,0.0031749248,0.00011679962,0.000029260982,0.013206197,0.007970229,0.00011276978,0.0009211963,0.07526595,0.8710545,0.027897196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095373674,0.000103882194,0.0015467269,0.00059045816,0.000028308144,0.0070096687,0.006013568,0.0003955882,0.00058466516,0.030911554,0.9526479,0.000072326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005665955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010689697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059116416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027044783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035765483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02610004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810354483","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2018-104804","title":"Device representatives in hospitals: are commercial imperatives driving clinical decision-making?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Receipt; Outsourcing; Public relations; Accountability; Health care; Payment; Health professionals; Product (mathematics); Business; Medicine; Political science; Marketing; Finance; Law; Accounting","score_opus":0.5499451376696158,"score_gpt":0.6951795252218297,"score_spread":0.14523438755221385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810354483","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06392906,0.0058788992,0.015315396,0.8824054,0.0015473231,0.00013329412,0.000026236557,0.000045032415,0.030719401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8588609,0.003273354,0.0072420784,0.12546276,0.0020659675,0.00021874794,0.000026578038,0.00006923889,0.0027803136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.62498677,0.31032953,0.012578539,0.009369536,0.026036525,0.01669906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.42626986,0.42958316,0.056457914,0.015226148,0.027965691,0.044497177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.20040081,0.0004275214,0.0008554852,0.001575761,0.015062778,0.025449397,0.00399163,0.017067622,0.008231815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3780828,0.0011569699,0.00092247856,0.0018512496,0.040241648,0.0164808,0.015557583,0.017422311,0.001514751],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037385622,0.0005304278,0.050294876,0.0011499998,0.00022146804,0.0075332536,0.13542858,0.0011395225,0.0010194503,0.52755105,0.094780825,0.17997664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023856015,0.0003776048,0.014136488,0.0041680294,0.00011120751,0.004862014,0.20843145,0.002398906,0.0015761671,0.5434739,0.21981628,0.00040939118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00325142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005248716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20040081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012730826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037631422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2865769117","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2016-103917","title":"Fair, just and compassionate: A pilot for making allocation decisions for patients requesting experimental drugs outside of clinical trials","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Sinai Health System; Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Compassionate Use; Status quo; Clinical trial; Medicine; Health care; Medical ethics; Public relations; Business; Political science; Law; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.5250177724856322,"score_gpt":0.6054967919252732,"score_spread":0.08047901943964098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2865769117","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1727036,0.0031614269,0.28967628,0.39281335,0.010392106,0.01850263,0.00049732055,0.0026447368,0.10960851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46939066,0.0015081393,0.46204716,0.040444843,0.0018888201,0.011914512,0.00020584904,0.00060500344,0.011995142],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.779247,0.19819103,0.004368418,0.0039605265,0.008353699,0.0058793104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5085597,0.40330893,0.009712137,0.031772096,0.019803064,0.026844159],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.23595954,0.00081002404,0.00082382874,0.0015111982,0.014689818,0.016085349,0.003998981,0.010031568,0.025440587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.35177997,0.0013297284,0.0022528085,0.0015168014,0.018538484,0.018943746,0.02017779,0.017431332,0.0051072417],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004824558,0.0051794806,0.01479944,0.0014544067,0.00019802427,0.006102303,0.08686289,0.004378948,0.0049549146,0.26675665,0.15293531,0.45155308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0069173626,0.007251989,0.008812049,0.004027066,0.0003626005,0.003586231,0.061132263,0.027224354,0.0076469346,0.33034572,0.5416959,0.0009974723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034521306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007414667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76404047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060831765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0378849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9421979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889913975","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2018-104896","title":"Medical Assistance in Dying at a paediatric hospital","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Hospital for Sick Children; De Veber; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Confusion; Stigma (botany); Institution; Population; Public relations; Sociology; Best interests; Medical humanities; Medicine; Nursing; Psychology; Medical education; Political science; Law; Social science; Psychiatry; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.1323203659210286,"score_gpt":0.4704447681932691,"score_spread":0.3381244022722405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889913975","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15516184,0.012407542,0.009751602,0.6951852,0.004159886,0.00014715313,0.00009587015,0.000067246634,0.12302371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91550475,0.009047403,0.0075176903,0.05717175,0.0011735944,0.00007839348,0.000029917566,0.0000398868,0.0094366865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845324,0.011263861,0.00055829756,0.0004490841,0.001370764,0.0018255749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.978869,0.008010596,0.002776076,0.00063189067,0.0016657657,0.00804672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009153243,0.00016045003,0.00024899928,0.0003233631,0.012725248,0.005646311,0.0010743723,0.0045012143,0.006077614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022885734,0.00023643681,0.00034378652,0.0005288268,0.012148103,0.0042931642,0.009394587,0.007131443,0.0007356121],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008225515,0.000130096,0.030812105,0.00080451556,0.000040247625,0.0225356,0.17200595,0.0014577573,0.0010341455,0.573741,0.12214302,0.0752132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024187802,0.00025409207,0.011043836,0.0030163995,0.000021529826,0.016130598,0.19132186,0.0005277777,0.0007826165,0.07380747,0.70295316,0.00011646109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0094837155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0308006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012725248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008607753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0274419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062453985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897182671","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2017-104515","title":"Reproductive outsourcing: an empirical ethics account of cross-border reproductive care in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; McGill Genome Centre; Université Laval; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Autonomy; Solidarity; Qualitative research; Research ethics; Public relations; Participant observation; Beneficence; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.1041263761469917,"score_gpt":0.5190745186924944,"score_spread":0.4149481425455027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897182671","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.783078,0.0057262527,0.0036506183,0.04736655,0.00018610437,0.0003857191,0.0002441774,0.000025594514,0.15933701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99190277,0.0016822235,0.00081908365,0.0016074026,0.000015658894,0.00005103112,0.000028938004,0.000013060857,0.0038798298],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875594,0.0050896946,0.0003422047,0.00071082567,0.0028399746,0.003457787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977997,0.012789211,0.0014648675,0.0004883604,0.0042368933,0.003023672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0095892735,0.00035919622,0.00043390336,0.0025649397,0.036527332,0.008671619,0.0022405814,0.0023657773,0.0032309438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020581642,0.0004155039,0.0003087287,0.0064333947,0.02561789,0.002628547,0.0073783905,0.0033555848,0.00012451591],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031856915,0.000056786328,0.016034493,0.00030305557,0.000013687683,0.0028497796,0.7683132,0.00086341344,0.00037726827,0.18800826,0.006735911,0.016412284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009108416,0.000014505653,0.013386182,0.00047117713,0.000016748401,0.0003789817,0.91877604,0.0008791426,0.00017447877,0.0077338032,0.05811621,0.000043652693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9878512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.992949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21660672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21660672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33118337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9086252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899254238","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2017-104339","title":"Of dilemmas and tensions: a qualitative study of palliative care physicians’ positions regarding voluntary active euthanasia in Quebec, Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Palliative care; Autonomy; Legislation; Narrative; End-of-life care; Qualitative research; Assisted suicide; Context (archaeology); Nursing; Medicine; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Law; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.2028862193014055,"score_gpt":0.49641525582321006,"score_spread":0.29352903652180456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899254238","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9718992,0.0020107685,0.0015834827,0.012702522,0.00016132188,0.00034241335,0.00028965613,0.000030896594,0.010979721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907051,0.00065225526,0.0006443914,0.0031040683,0.000025373956,0.00014436958,0.000075327676,0.000028683555,0.0046204897],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98460776,0.010018598,0.00028175022,0.00089152437,0.0013507836,0.0028496748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96126956,0.02483176,0.0021164382,0.00049652765,0.005379987,0.0059057996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011962207,0.0006729468,0.00083875505,0.001818704,0.0330669,0.006868639,0.0036419807,0.0035033254,0.0044482616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023339454,0.00069782225,0.00040583193,0.0029182448,0.021357229,0.0030786842,0.0044760546,0.005178293,0.00030612282],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023034108,0.000021036554,0.0016624519,0.00005372119,0.0000026259067,0.0006377991,0.99418443,0.00003649539,0.00029142134,0.0006920056,0.0010981394,0.0012969569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046309806,0.0000149246025,0.0013323616,0.00011429866,0.0000025556956,0.000099293684,0.9890302,0.00007733539,0.00007699944,0.00010668274,0.009126242,0.00001454829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86765504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94488484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13234496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.073676154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.082932435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53456044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900688051","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2018-104982","title":"Situating requests for medical aid in dying within the broader context of end-of-life care: ethical considerations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Centre Integre de Sante et de Services Sociaux de Laval; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"McGill University Health Centre","keywords":"End-of-life care; Context (archaeology); Palliative care; Psychological intervention; Intervention (counseling); Medicine; Interpretation (philosophy); Psychology; Nursing; Gerontology; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.23047228277503978,"score_gpt":0.4984843056130418,"score_spread":0.268012022838002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900688051","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4222409,0.009774924,0.019502418,0.520847,0.0015258868,0.0010986982,0.00032126156,0.00005824104,0.02463057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93567866,0.0025329373,0.007184904,0.051916696,0.00066874264,0.00045258107,0.00006134883,0.000027805676,0.0014763704],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8208913,0.14110784,0.009258373,0.0036642395,0.01711823,0.007959978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6091239,0.29089203,0.042572916,0.009535839,0.034183122,0.013692177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14997344,0.00033160945,0.00065216667,0.001564359,0.009475835,0.009226698,0.002606918,0.004263106,0.0020027615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22551154,0.00042803722,0.00044288082,0.0018018392,0.02427194,0.0057045766,0.0052782185,0.0070597227,0.00027435605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032671957,0.00026403333,0.2510845,0.0020114689,0.00014377903,0.018460043,0.4958363,0.0010543168,0.0025130343,0.08249811,0.046559196,0.09924847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055140332,0.0002677821,0.10254402,0.009598878,0.00009682146,0.010595317,0.6617775,0.0024535132,0.001892034,0.046813365,0.16355957,0.00034604652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10284219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2069511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14997344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021908551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06437455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7931448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900751875","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2018-105003","title":"Drawing the line on physician-assisted death","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Paternalism; Terminally ill; Argument (complex analysis); Meaning (existential); Medicine; Law; Scope (computer science); Medical practice; Sociology; Psychology; Nursing; Family medicine; Palliative care; Political science; Psychotherapist; Computer science","score_opus":0.27417700781973037,"score_gpt":0.5861741512083343,"score_spread":0.3119971433886039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900751875","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021750242,0.0059040803,0.0042048376,0.93584305,0.0066442667,0.000016285558,0.000015347676,0.000015293965,0.04518187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16838302,0.008810739,0.0045490596,0.79338455,0.011737685,0.00008746092,0.000022792492,0.0000716478,0.012953041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94284576,0.030878613,0.0024096067,0.0049967626,0.015344567,0.0035247228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9052515,0.070764296,0.0043046577,0.0039060435,0.011769633,0.004003788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039956678,0.00058325875,0.00096900476,0.001404631,0.013126126,0.015785191,0.003224488,0.037680827,0.003734269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08784281,0.0005738846,0.0010687063,0.0009554183,0.054386992,0.021219313,0.009770465,0.050354995,0.0018273584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024342022,0.0000145203085,0.00022855081,0.00006347686,0.000007388426,0.00012081524,0.0024386647,0.00012318355,0.00007202652,0.92853934,0.05612046,0.012247341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059879334,0.00008186947,0.00062469346,0.0015539221,0.000020841931,0.00023486157,0.0036959995,0.00037689344,0.00030701622,0.5061811,0.4867822,0.00008075816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013128899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013501433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039956678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0097012995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01864854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2113136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904694623","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2018-105272","title":"Grounded ethical analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Data science; Grounded theory; Engineering ethics; Computer science; World Wide Web; Sociology; Engineering; Qualitative research; Social science","score_opus":0.056887747925552706,"score_gpt":0.48579809933903123,"score_spread":0.42891035141347855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904694623","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008030667,0.004666886,0.49344045,0.10454323,0.005834197,0.018970575,0.0020202333,0.0006589233,0.3618349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14970216,0.005170012,0.7259903,0.0270654,0.0008834676,0.030805444,0.0022500511,0.00069231365,0.057440877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8403636,0.12484798,0.007131079,0.006023086,0.019049915,0.0025843664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8086743,0.1331222,0.005328665,0.022788173,0.026691813,0.0033948002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1170672,0.0013464572,0.0016315015,0.0037480905,0.008150708,0.014633103,0.004939239,0.006538252,0.020432008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13777299,0.0009470053,0.0017481719,0.003925323,0.019497508,0.006124757,0.008880731,0.0107375225,0.004627242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040130035,0.00008126723,0.00037418664,0.0013331993,0.000052278516,0.00019438594,0.037212867,0.0009894315,0.0003155999,0.8524828,0.055717133,0.05120661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005545389,0.000041798437,0.00023358474,0.0030401533,0.000020442374,0.00014525325,0.013693246,0.0011551243,0.00032682417,0.46566188,0.5155786,0.000047666486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041689617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008179995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1170672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014160253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038414605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.619118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915434968","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2018-104867","title":"Informed consent for functional MRI research on comatose patients following severe brain injury: balancing the social benefits of research against patient autonomy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Traumatic Brain Injury Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Informed consent; Autonomy; Proxy (statistics); Clinical research; Intensive care unit; Psychology; Deception; Research ethics; Medicine; Affect (linguistics); Intensive care medicine; Psychiatry; Social psychology; Computer science; Alternative medicine; Law; Political science; Pathology","score_opus":0.28396276428616773,"score_gpt":0.5025206722295507,"score_spread":0.21855790794338292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2915434968","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20333096,0.010179729,0.19615103,0.47689545,0.006194056,0.025608303,0.00045022444,0.0002914537,0.08089868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.809917,0.0072814734,0.10487217,0.043355383,0.0024981513,0.02073211,0.000310847,0.00009011919,0.010942849],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.80775464,0.17134932,0.010254879,0.0024459334,0.0048198183,0.0033754557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8063671,0.14449842,0.010459404,0.024536544,0.0077671898,0.0063712425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13432197,0.0008340172,0.0015096931,0.0016577384,0.006015821,0.0047930605,0.0031436488,0.013870762,0.0057797064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18528548,0.00067382277,0.0015014489,0.0014599249,0.015821056,0.006143071,0.006752523,0.01052112,0.00215769],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019934701,0.0011455294,0.016900526,0.0024811171,0.00016679901,0.0654565,0.22195262,0.0017562098,0.017409505,0.398198,0.06980944,0.20273028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008847884,0.0023796072,0.015916096,0.0097641405,0.0001769748,0.06013843,0.12576024,0.009023417,0.011902661,0.4080795,0.35522604,0.00074804435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010811177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017060717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13432197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002482292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019158162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.710371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915898433","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2018-105099","title":"‘I just need an opiate refill to get me through the weekend’","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Opioid Use Disorder Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficence; Autonomy; Medical prescription; Duty; Fiduciary; Medicine; Medical ethics; Opioid; Opioid epidemic; Psychiatry; Political science; Nursing; Law","score_opus":0.06409793850064714,"score_gpt":0.40135966631972064,"score_spread":0.3372617278190735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2915898433","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019056385,0.010626983,0.023837525,0.78531736,0.015311356,0.00015053744,0.00012393859,0.00029100777,0.14528489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2163385,0.013449144,0.020188482,0.61370516,0.006955413,0.00025841026,0.00015206478,0.00030917928,0.12864363],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939427,0.003491453,0.00030092394,0.00034740736,0.0012983807,0.00061912334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945762,0.0016252941,0.0009658262,0.00017253768,0.0015145254,0.0011456471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003853584,0.00039479966,0.00040110727,0.00028768778,0.0044710706,0.0026873068,0.0011104409,0.005055801,0.011588522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015085162,0.00027358782,0.000528101,0.00025553993,0.0053990385,0.0047977865,0.0026318943,0.008040977,0.0068070255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011697637,0.00027139756,0.0059204726,0.00061049574,0.000043395376,0.0040323725,0.0393845,0.0002417214,0.002372294,0.078616954,0.7595498,0.108839564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014215804,0.00011729158,0.0020574743,0.0005167959,0.000010754502,0.006035918,0.016553957,0.00020749496,0.0005229627,0.009934108,0.9639646,0.00006433879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036491652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008084441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011588522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015885577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028239836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038767457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918511500","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2018-105304","title":"Should the deceased be listed as authors?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"American Ornithological Society","keywords":"Relation (database); Point (geometry); Outcome (game theory); Inclusion (mineral); Process (computing); Computer science; Psychology; Data science; Social psychology; Data mining","score_opus":0.10028237868989147,"score_gpt":0.4259341482556972,"score_spread":0.3256517695658057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918511500","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09637433,0.027908484,0.040496,0.7055686,0.024858749,0.00043261083,0.00039943377,0.00021791774,0.1037439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.806664,0.013364164,0.023744078,0.11508437,0.0066734846,0.0005828994,0.00026900513,0.00018780107,0.033430282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.87800646,0.0888103,0.012341314,0.004567059,0.011587738,0.004687106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.73947513,0.15368922,0.031792752,0.030480696,0.034385685,0.0101765515],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09808396,0.00033291453,0.00091364566,0.001519093,0.009108028,0.010382555,0.0024027217,0.010774016,0.0072785993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3024931,0.00042964055,0.00067707454,0.0024253745,0.00981419,0.016075127,0.005253339,0.007033766,0.0043044207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003325391,0.00013421143,0.02874689,0.002440001,0.00008224894,0.0050459006,0.113124244,0.0001320634,0.0011574628,0.5139072,0.12947474,0.20542243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082299135,0.00014968723,0.006288995,0.006424493,0.0000727429,0.009577928,0.08524824,0.0003463027,0.0027458004,0.19547741,0.6934528,0.00013328843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002082849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00340589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.989226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024035561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010457449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5187237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921665581","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2018-105305","title":"We don’t need unilateral DNRs: taking informed non-dissent one step further","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; St. Boniface Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Psychological intervention; Conceptualization; Process (computing); Psychology; Intervention (counseling); Constitutionality; Psychotherapist; Medicine; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Computer science; Psychiatry; Politics","score_opus":0.1620845003178489,"score_gpt":0.4594344654512475,"score_spread":0.2973499651333986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921665581","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027245173,0.003965827,0.10982604,0.74526536,0.0053026946,0.00035034568,0.000035910667,0.0002537754,0.10775497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6604093,0.003083167,0.08773536,0.22703218,0.00299244,0.0009978797,0.000044910234,0.00030791987,0.01739685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.89707047,0.07677886,0.0037614566,0.0048201294,0.012768101,0.004800943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8716888,0.093624465,0.0075697373,0.01099442,0.0069134627,0.0092091495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10402254,0.0009577181,0.0012870235,0.0011769813,0.010812429,0.017055467,0.0041483077,0.020927453,0.0059233434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20314533,0.00095407333,0.0014120096,0.0006575737,0.06460058,0.03176365,0.019098762,0.031483848,0.0031396227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015185046,0.00020944192,0.0017009544,0.0004755391,0.00008459412,0.002343863,0.09247481,0.0007405941,0.0015615735,0.79545945,0.027872989,0.07692436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101985046,0.000088307934,0.00040083352,0.0012636525,0.000044982615,0.0016038703,0.02028449,0.0011859839,0.0012454893,0.8517767,0.12189025,0.00011331213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015295226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003126407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10402254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004930383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02220181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55013037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922171892","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2018-105160","title":"Canadian neurosurgeons’ views on medical assistance in dying (MAID): a cross-sectional survey of Canadian Neurosurgical Society (CNSS) members","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Island Health; McMaster University; Dalhousie University; Moncton Hospital; University of Saskatchewan; University of Ottawa; Saint John Regional Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Cross-sectional study; Medicine; Family medicine; Pathology","score_opus":0.09184022258758305,"score_gpt":0.3748883814095059,"score_spread":0.28304815882192286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922171892","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925027,0.00048017062,0.0000442856,0.001829186,0.000027021848,0.00006121194,0.0013415853,0.0000047483354,0.0037092466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975249,0.00068894186,0.0001119788,0.0005692298,0.00001420927,0.000032263797,0.0005476462,0.0000028637385,0.0005079738],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971745,0.0003087051,0.00019252776,0.00020513126,0.0014550197,0.0006640203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910453,0.0007418229,0.002497781,0.00014333341,0.003070507,0.0025012624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028369804,0.00023019132,0.00028822973,0.0016433164,0.0031940814,0.0014281886,0.0010528915,0.00078972446,0.0028605042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0089384485,0.00035993167,0.00039990956,0.0028735115,0.0014652167,0.0008764446,0.0014815856,0.0013087777,0.00034135787],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046295227,0.00007402586,0.9722197,0.00011295919,0.000034454355,0.0001293881,0.017968955,0.00003747289,0.00015499145,0.00013512718,0.0045107882,0.0045758993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039873858,0.000052115956,0.9631741,0.00010208959,0.000009466451,0.00009537518,0.033256512,0.000081442995,0.00003564661,0.000019027906,0.003148273,0.000021952677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9118495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93723714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98955625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010443727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016088497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17733926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2936154457","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2018-105293","title":"Gatekeeping hormone replacement therapy for transgender patients is dehumanising","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":177,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Gatekeeping; Transgender; Referral; Informed consent; Foregrounding; Prejudice (legal term); Psychology; Mental health; Health care; Medicine; Psychotherapist; Nursing; Alternative medicine; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.12443491128108566,"score_gpt":0.4657815645875217,"score_spread":0.341346653306436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2936154457","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07267597,0.005576711,0.008001571,0.8593727,0.0019251566,0.000041842308,0.0000055612104,0.000056467805,0.052344184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81678337,0.005585923,0.0052238167,0.16523069,0.00086018315,0.00006763535,0.0000046025993,0.000037944843,0.0062058675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9626064,0.030178718,0.0012082235,0.00084444584,0.0036003187,0.0015619814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.950641,0.035119772,0.0064258953,0.0025980822,0.0019582068,0.0032569978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027409365,0.00021891814,0.000508117,0.00043167654,0.00968179,0.007187466,0.0010323289,0.0077280602,0.0024104076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04995255,0.00031549044,0.0004231651,0.00037058315,0.04199699,0.0048919283,0.008711771,0.011995454,0.0007340781],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001323648,0.00030474536,0.007122414,0.00036717963,0.000042212105,0.0027884406,0.3337672,0.00040839153,0.002819548,0.47891018,0.04542371,0.12791365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009241731,0.0005172287,0.0058350745,0.0027041582,0.000052152078,0.009035166,0.18001363,0.000971055,0.0024779548,0.40015462,0.3979984,0.00014800871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028718219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044905287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027409365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031667675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0133381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14495629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949601437","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105374","title":"Ethical issues raised by cluster randomised trials conducted in low-resource settings: identifying gaps in the<i>Ottawa Statement</i>through an analysis of the PURE Malawi trial","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; Western University","funders":"Fogarty International Center; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; National Institutes of Health; Wellcome Trust; National Institute of Mental Health; Eli Lilly and Company","keywords":"Cluster randomised controlled trial; Psychological intervention; Resource (disambiguation); Research ethics; Medicine; Statement (logic); Clinical trial; Informed consent; Family medicine; Medical education; Public relations; Alternative medicine; Nursing; Political science; Law; Psychiatry; Computer science","score_opus":0.30765842156694995,"score_gpt":0.5830316325230943,"score_spread":0.27537321095614437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949601437","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03671381,0.07007687,0.2334732,0.5965199,0.011392861,0.02798186,0.002520293,0.00024672635,0.021074552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35415867,0.016036356,0.35404044,0.18832196,0.003958213,0.07894435,0.0008431585,0.0004905776,0.0032062153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.06256891,0.82758045,0.073664084,0.0057569845,0.027746778,0.0026827506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.0286947,0.8614844,0.035655588,0.030013558,0.041491516,0.0026601218],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.80807763,0.0012792947,0.005167292,0.00668659,0.0069213184,0.019774426,0.006187498,0.009019056,0.0033431072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.88268095,0.0025197926,0.0051779123,0.009499347,0.026157709,0.014298336,0.011685903,0.014784935,0.0006352445],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004892025,0.00036706915,0.024543716,0.06712569,0.0065570306,0.0011542487,0.10508457,0.004940838,0.0007369308,0.45417845,0.08384932,0.24657011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025062517,0.0016600082,0.02143693,0.2016459,0.0050861253,0.0014909791,0.040176205,0.011937273,0.0023480388,0.36809337,0.34274253,0.0008764136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0270601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04919931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9909809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028298493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13495417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23667449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2957375615","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105393","title":"To die, to sleep, perchance to dream? A response to DeMichelis, Shaul and Rapoport","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dream; Sleep (system call); Psychology; Computer science; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.03472695727304633,"score_gpt":0.3747503165877398,"score_spread":0.34002335931469346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2957375615","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00053109747,0.0004235579,0.000064274085,0.99473745,0.0028713217,0.0000045414163,0.0000075364806,0.0000091055335,0.0013511213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0040159123,0.00023832121,0.00016749372,0.98929477,0.0032175789,0.000022803413,0.000004125415,0.0000092288,0.003029864],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99379855,0.0028686703,0.0005303504,0.00066373387,0.0012711051,0.00086757255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818741,0.012624475,0.0009849045,0.00034587315,0.0018290079,0.002341734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072825835,0.00059933704,0.0009623625,0.00064779544,0.00816954,0.004954284,0.0018644753,0.069387615,0.0033219573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04450076,0.0009304371,0.0010063861,0.00089248724,0.005850385,0.0056027477,0.0027442416,0.07627423,0.0027558594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051001298,0.00004856892,0.0005428902,0.0000545464,0.000009335972,0.0026381481,0.0019584945,0.00010408045,0.00026371368,0.014280028,0.9725136,0.0075355843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008892269,0.00012363284,0.001431036,0.00071877486,0.000025860585,0.0055189854,0.0052285204,0.0010061646,0.00055709935,0.025728906,0.95942557,0.00014640222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007010029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0091916695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069387615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005580185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007984606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04048729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2961892772","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105628","title":"Reply to ‘Hormone replacement therapy: informed consent without assessment?’","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Transgender; Informed consent; Anxiety; Hormone replacement therapy (female-to-male); Psychology; Psychotherapist; Medicine; Psychiatry; Alternative medicine; Testosterone (patch); Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.15367166487757813,"score_gpt":0.5057244705365359,"score_spread":0.3520528056589578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2961892772","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015875211,0.00038478017,0.00008102768,0.9922544,0.0064205183,0.000007729574,0.000021268848,0.000012219603,0.0006593255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012548841,0.00015259562,0.000098688084,0.9932847,0.0042013237,0.000018445318,0.00000543179,0.0000086462105,0.0009753122],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.986673,0.005920384,0.0018509645,0.0017477889,0.0025298935,0.001277902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9699644,0.022851752,0.0014435984,0.00067619194,0.0033805391,0.0016835072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0140565345,0.0009189003,0.0014639288,0.0008142518,0.006530396,0.0047491267,0.0031187718,0.09343412,0.0050656404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.072318494,0.0011040395,0.0014997663,0.0009053641,0.006718616,0.006763175,0.0027430803,0.07918494,0.004438398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004460393,0.00002024085,0.00034928738,0.000076181124,0.00001099668,0.0015481954,0.00090075226,0.000043754477,0.00021822062,0.006238103,0.9865588,0.0039909054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009086348,0.00008004264,0.0013718369,0.0009592815,0.000030909378,0.0038528456,0.0026159028,0.0004972507,0.00040286046,0.014793092,0.97515225,0.00015281166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077979965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072893496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09343412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006184878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007403655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07433897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963447074","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105436","title":"The ‘serious’ factor in germline modification","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivism; Bioethics; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.08973882122951211,"score_gpt":0.46098667606249155,"score_spread":0.37124785483297945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963447074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051519156,0.026822494,0.14552304,0.17571361,0.0047104624,0.00018197144,0.00019049358,0.00023579235,0.59510297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8682211,0.008330903,0.030593192,0.041837957,0.002224377,0.00021721127,0.00008248287,0.0001583856,0.04833438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901052,0.0038810843,0.0005378833,0.0017044239,0.003002329,0.0007690592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859918,0.008775959,0.0011610782,0.0020790985,0.0013402664,0.00065176684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011236272,0.00041964208,0.00044818353,0.0007590627,0.002340491,0.003915391,0.0013372208,0.0060606347,0.0062530586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022654325,0.0003461531,0.0005589448,0.00054176134,0.038815517,0.0056601604,0.0052994457,0.0056774886,0.0007743111],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010322447,0.0000075578278,0.000512529,0.00005174649,0.000005619051,0.0001387788,0.0012610733,0.00014121101,0.0003181787,0.9876695,0.0014691221,0.0084143495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015484222,0.000064200874,0.00088172016,0.0002531882,0.000021000258,0.0010508558,0.0009093967,0.00027446696,0.001246747,0.84985554,0.14540245,0.00002490693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025699537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028905019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011236272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025035131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003354542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059423745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963890664","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2018-105138","title":"Delaying and withholding interventions: ethics and the stepped wedge trial","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Psychological intervention; Wedge (geometry); Intervention (counseling); Research ethics; Psychology; Research design; Social psychology; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Sociology; Psychiatry; Social science","score_opus":0.6371395408951888,"score_gpt":0.6422575864975051,"score_spread":0.0051180456023163234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963890664","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.087283835,0.05478672,0.3207709,0.4278311,0.006532899,0.005585274,0.00018538481,0.00011710141,0.096906796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65244985,0.014432458,0.22645254,0.09100266,0.0020921563,0.0074245036,0.00004404829,0.00006119269,0.0060406225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6947157,0.28075975,0.0062634815,0.0037409284,0.013140114,0.0013800306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4952789,0.4672939,0.018777624,0.011367697,0.005290592,0.0019913202],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.21404462,0.00049630884,0.0013597226,0.0010251963,0.002123728,0.0054120077,0.0021872385,0.010133625,0.0026983968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.38111937,0.0004906845,0.0009776694,0.0013175268,0.02082345,0.00784899,0.0055722124,0.009326586,0.0004308669],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00070442905,0.00014134377,0.0019386408,0.0019649698,0.00018658054,0.00038656793,0.0045347726,0.00074841373,0.00036897426,0.90939313,0.0055349935,0.07409712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010438174,0.00095967663,0.0020187339,0.0076710237,0.00023083737,0.0013528022,0.002919621,0.0031735857,0.0016905891,0.9055393,0.07328033,0.00011978747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059120776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001061134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78595537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032020754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010356142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9692229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966938158","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105664","title":"Continuing the conversation about medical assistance in dying","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Hospital for Sick Children; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; World Wide Web; Medicine; Data science; Computer science; Internet privacy; Psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.16215409662767438,"score_gpt":0.4633856658181718,"score_spread":0.30123156919049743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966938158","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027915862,0.00062522787,0.00005409585,0.99450845,0.0029751344,0.0000024800056,0.0000030721656,0.0000042211514,0.0015480671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0036347352,0.0002962906,0.00009333668,0.99016625,0.003561577,0.000012281148,0.0000018105351,0.000007853423,0.002225831],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863537,0.007807991,0.0007952356,0.0009588193,0.0025319455,0.0015523684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95695126,0.034027528,0.0013370254,0.00068413856,0.0033866526,0.0036134853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016250232,0.0006385673,0.0011409622,0.00083759666,0.017540839,0.009763275,0.0026672615,0.07772587,0.004851946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057697054,0.0007884184,0.0010657661,0.0011151619,0.014484693,0.012806918,0.004485899,0.07543942,0.0029018552],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028068822,0.000032435353,0.00035598472,0.00008110891,0.000008979971,0.0019082015,0.0081199305,0.000067901135,0.00016612101,0.031869028,0.9466493,0.010712873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037584305,0.000041779476,0.0006888127,0.0005977382,0.000011278571,0.002695579,0.010753574,0.00035932742,0.00016712556,0.030812884,0.95375985,0.00007443119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016840864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027995268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07772587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010203081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0154354405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08594048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973062329","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105703","title":"Professionalism eliminates religion as a proper tool for doctors rendering advice to patients","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Rendering (computer graphics); Public relations; Law; Sociology; Medicine; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.14767429283058933,"score_gpt":0.532210648759603,"score_spread":0.3845363559290137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973062329","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021807656,0.000779783,0.00030517788,0.9721727,0.0035536943,0.000015223718,0.000017174287,0.000020738422,0.02095475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03290099,0.00045823798,0.00034377456,0.9380412,0.0037796474,0.000027238919,0.000008646416,0.000022325647,0.024417913],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99100304,0.002861627,0.0006981089,0.0010964706,0.0028883372,0.0014524315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98278296,0.0110879,0.0013527158,0.00068782055,0.0027060185,0.0013826528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070946747,0.00032719757,0.00054173835,0.00043692565,0.009089061,0.0068681906,0.0017275285,0.05687844,0.0058721295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031835023,0.0007947239,0.0007721614,0.0004623554,0.011817262,0.0045138514,0.0034818556,0.04021699,0.004048502],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110021596,0.000052105403,0.0020059892,0.00015817715,0.000015330199,0.0018816033,0.005710026,0.0001084158,0.00084003375,0.2620637,0.7124575,0.014597086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007110959,0.00007478742,0.0022709619,0.000572907,0.000020588304,0.0020696411,0.0043439874,0.00056548446,0.00069413433,0.051294554,0.93795604,0.00006591633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024963316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05644147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05687844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057720533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011816661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049636006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982560574","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105742","title":"Arrogance of ‘but all you need is a good index finger’: A narrative ethics exploration of lack of universal funding of PSA screening in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Situated; Prostate cancer; Medicine; Prostate-specific antigen; Psychology; Medical education; Family medicine; Cancer; Internal medicine; Literature","score_opus":0.15473615486586234,"score_gpt":0.3850230815499141,"score_spread":0.23028692668405176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982560574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42262435,0.006925408,0.004442182,0.41149193,0.0011081123,0.00019134735,0.00016896991,0.000045211687,0.15300247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9733104,0.0016765017,0.0005700486,0.015527015,0.00007348164,0.000059645878,0.000025072404,0.00003941465,0.008718451],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9760884,0.012503818,0.00043784303,0.001248346,0.004225092,0.0054964926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96055055,0.018916804,0.002584421,0.00066513807,0.0061252317,0.011157972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015549274,0.00051938306,0.0006827423,0.0012080813,0.05874126,0.01924115,0.0038221248,0.005933592,0.0034814882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03174425,0.0007503104,0.00046539135,0.0022605774,0.051929586,0.0068056746,0.011529182,0.01528234,0.00028992002],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030382878,0.000036394318,0.0022077872,0.00009256941,0.000011625868,0.002108615,0.871218,0.00020476969,0.00016196299,0.0985464,0.020093674,0.0052877627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012771664,0.0000139113745,0.0016439393,0.00042850518,0.000013518155,0.0005542692,0.85847235,0.00038435805,0.00015919602,0.010790393,0.12746292,0.000063894324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9277956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96064854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18840511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18840511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23641032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.941335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2986471684","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105832","title":"‘Serious’ factor—a relevant starting point for further debate: a response","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pluripotent Stem Cells Research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivism; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Scope (computer science); Relevance (law); Engineering ethics; Perspective (graphical); Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology of scientific knowledge; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.045150253770958194,"score_gpt":0.3603575333974783,"score_spread":0.31520727962652006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2986471684","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013141076,0.0005634782,0.00025521696,0.9909933,0.007655487,0.0000046914683,0.000009207866,0.000014689256,0.0003725262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024140184,0.00034507137,0.00044725277,0.9869604,0.008499804,0.000027886585,0.000006911399,0.00004153041,0.0012571255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9651311,0.016178047,0.003448462,0.005317804,0.0069629964,0.0029615716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8777993,0.09506847,0.004301998,0.0032075152,0.014592175,0.005030485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035772707,0.0015750058,0.0028692752,0.0016018318,0.008446082,0.012926842,0.00873582,0.10168415,0.0071583064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12236871,0.0013229197,0.0030127887,0.0017378415,0.03031612,0.023127563,0.011445877,0.12698363,0.004396751],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004980222,0.0000382581,0.00024575682,0.00020632919,0.000021081292,0.0006704262,0.009005938,0.000112808135,0.00036695722,0.081038915,0.90205306,0.0061907647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049190086,0.000053478143,0.0004697237,0.00078275707,0.00002963571,0.001127051,0.013804071,0.00052398164,0.0005638652,0.061357293,0.92098534,0.0002536034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007349492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060068686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10168415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009457052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011762019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18918645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989452620","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105598","title":"Evidence first, practice second in arthroscopic surgery: use of placebo surgery in randomised controlled trial","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Healthcare cost, quality, practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Placebo; Randomized controlled trial; Evidence-based medicine; Clinical trial; Sham surgery; Arthroscopy; Surgery; Physical therapy; MEDLINE; Harm; Alternative medicine; General surgery; Psychology","score_opus":0.7215033332355886,"score_gpt":0.5864939803248994,"score_spread":0.13500935291068916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989452620","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013387919,0.39210537,0.33358273,0.10442868,0.054142483,0.062048215,0.0030949854,0.0011250441,0.03608451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3107673,0.053359266,0.4144259,0.05811628,0.010649728,0.14645797,0.0010152819,0.0005171048,0.0046912148],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.23979197,0.6457809,0.059707396,0.016086537,0.0373963,0.001236897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.27901626,0.59141135,0.06067678,0.04739264,0.018932607,0.0025703567],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.42467603,0.0029472806,0.010533324,0.006678759,0.0031221048,0.014673358,0.004075414,0.016215343,0.012041996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.72407097,0.0025399064,0.008027563,0.006980025,0.015532059,0.011119135,0.0059649046,0.01211494,0.002355884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.022847716,0.0010748511,0.008385075,0.21538223,0.041551016,0.0007419055,0.004930093,0.0021665893,0.0011982091,0.2103589,0.03335204,0.4580114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05728227,0.010012569,0.007892451,0.26041368,0.03495595,0.002063368,0.0017010882,0.010113161,0.003651223,0.41822058,0.19298558,0.00070805475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016764156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014048952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57532394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007853968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013926429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7094769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990077275","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105938","title":"Ottawa Statement does not impede randomised evaluation of government health programmes","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; Western University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Statement (logic); Government (linguistics); Alternative medicine; Medicine; Political science; Data science; Computer science; Law; Pathology","score_opus":0.1470914022423993,"score_gpt":0.4013036769081585,"score_spread":0.2542122746657592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990077275","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012621458,0.0009908143,0.00022981866,0.97906196,0.013275275,0.000043775828,0.00009266821,0.000042266718,0.0061372714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013957535,0.00048259227,0.00052431406,0.9838239,0.0071024303,0.000098850534,0.000027498538,0.000042979216,0.0065016486],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.909669,0.025484195,0.018935842,0.006080689,0.032620516,0.007209673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70645505,0.22915953,0.012820079,0.010844262,0.029358989,0.01136199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0702435,0.0010448447,0.002640398,0.0015464092,0.01092056,0.011332613,0.0074919364,0.15552515,0.014576966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2583891,0.0026294456,0.0035658232,0.0027399163,0.014305925,0.010071505,0.005225053,0.08934257,0.012028089],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006904107,0.000022718203,0.0002264605,0.00019736477,0.000021947264,0.0003387684,0.00030530142,0.000067601046,0.0000736692,0.023252616,0.9691886,0.0062360624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010347564,0.000037982252,0.00041775958,0.0006449235,0.000035233963,0.00025618137,0.00021060089,0.00025772222,0.00013200098,0.012321687,0.9854865,0.0000959285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.079832055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15758885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15552515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02251473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058416948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37148756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992999517","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105855","title":"Conscientious objection and moral distress: a relational ethics case study of MAiD in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; St. Paul's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Bioethics; Conscientious objector; Health care; Constructive; Distress; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Computer science; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.15419557529169162,"score_gpt":0.5110393762624028,"score_spread":0.3568438009707112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992999517","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9736462,0.0010649187,0.00062440615,0.010250403,0.00010052717,0.00017164653,0.000053790667,0.00001205288,0.014075995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930728,0.0007807974,0.0005734808,0.0014799625,0.000026843367,0.00003924202,0.000017503515,0.000015484053,0.0039939103],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99606055,0.001338521,0.00012016913,0.00025844638,0.00062470615,0.0015976515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937442,0.0015307991,0.0006237439,0.00015202956,0.0005095646,0.0034397254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023909586,0.0007102851,0.00091006904,0.0018726677,0.049745195,0.0051795505,0.0026869464,0.0046980735,0.0040615047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009541966,0.0006327436,0.0006967829,0.0032000807,0.012187076,0.0018629283,0.0075315135,0.008432675,0.00030438512],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010951291,0.0006479864,0.030307496,0.0002286833,0.000039098188,0.10569558,0.8301753,0.0003705523,0.0007486669,0.016330224,0.0043179365,0.011028992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022679258,0.00010807139,0.014913609,0.00035441224,0.000024953586,0.021433681,0.9368781,0.0008203292,0.00027168394,0.0026208598,0.022469519,0.00008200182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8275088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9328734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1724912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061244227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0538226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44436008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995741260","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-106003","title":"Randomised evaluation of government health programmes does present a challenge to standard research ethics frameworks","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute for Health and Care Research; Wellcome Trust; Wellcome","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Data science; Political science; Medicine; Management science; Computer science; Medical education; Engineering","score_opus":0.3506682235857784,"score_gpt":0.4962058524877009,"score_spread":0.14553762890192246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995741260","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013173558,0.014504408,0.03228918,0.92792726,0.01811911,0.0006634237,0.00006713056,0.00008375435,0.0050283456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.089467786,0.009879979,0.09208267,0.7699804,0.030630484,0.0056534163,0.00008801563,0.0002513444,0.0019660098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.1307642,0.7427955,0.044302553,0.015103438,0.06285111,0.0041831783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.07590355,0.8446231,0.015273864,0.036320336,0.024838194,0.003041089],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.75947684,0.0014145573,0.007776123,0.0034637162,0.006981443,0.018240264,0.011077413,0.045508187,0.003637419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.73627037,0.0022928417,0.006717493,0.003917558,0.07558511,0.03242671,0.014170094,0.049557976,0.0016861077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036718015,0.0001998785,0.0006660305,0.005059833,0.0006166029,0.00018747934,0.009799383,0.0007324673,0.00021253027,0.81169784,0.099153,0.07130769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008661642,0.00073204894,0.0009605584,0.011402188,0.00038394626,0.00043341788,0.0030821466,0.0022348268,0.0005229812,0.7187192,0.2603641,0.00029838397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043483195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066538933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24052316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016868938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04921481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2966079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996349300","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105423","title":"A matter of time: grappling with everyday ethical tensions at the confluence between policy and practice in a psychiatric unit","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Mental Health and Patient Involvement","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mental Health Research Canada; Jewish General Hospital; McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Normative; Context (archaeology); Mental health; Sociology; Empirical research; Research ethics; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Nursing; Social psychology; Medicine; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Psychotherapist; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.2047073622465824,"score_gpt":0.5184810182540115,"score_spread":0.3137736560074291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996349300","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8757433,0.004890346,0.015296701,0.07864319,0.0009517228,0.0002687444,0.000065888424,0.00009828064,0.024041882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98971796,0.0012106061,0.0032751546,0.0041301316,0.000098808625,0.00014149012,0.000021555858,0.00007169604,0.0013326658],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8798097,0.10251706,0.002342366,0.0032725711,0.0050553624,0.0070029367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91537696,0.059776213,0.007431393,0.0042569446,0.0037014314,0.009457075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05113356,0.0007917586,0.0010579353,0.0023940143,0.030793946,0.023963567,0.0041895565,0.0063904854,0.0038245015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08343843,0.001356586,0.0007397569,0.0024061839,0.082171775,0.02520623,0.024112204,0.014160711,0.0006860858],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003137945,0.0000382577,0.0017064603,0.00011479999,0.000009462719,0.0009996822,0.98049265,0.000091525566,0.00018321068,0.00979309,0.0014766436,0.005062859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036048032,0.000028282648,0.000505592,0.00021085267,0.00000457784,0.00031479038,0.98413014,0.00008219506,0.000095615025,0.004753771,0.009848182,0.000022451151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074742814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01616893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05113356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020849923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021652635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27042335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996508770","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105837","title":"Imperfect by design: the problematic ethics of surgical training","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Innovations in Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Deontological ethics; Quality (philosophy); Social contract; Intervention (counseling); Psychology; Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development; Individualism; Medical ethics; Compromise; Medical education; Engineering ethics; Moral reasoning; Public relations; Medicine; Nursing; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Politics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10107702552971778,"score_gpt":0.4283887677613671,"score_spread":0.32731174223164927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996508770","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050674044,0.012189777,0.3022393,0.48472264,0.0061066123,0.001276988,0.00014720927,0.00035867078,0.14228472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7737217,0.0031064409,0.12990975,0.07092315,0.002463211,0.003687899,0.00007201307,0.00037582035,0.01574008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.51487136,0.42408177,0.010200404,0.0109219365,0.03601008,0.003914382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5974262,0.3146761,0.019830583,0.04340424,0.018852394,0.0058105993],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.31236592,0.00072141667,0.0014012033,0.0018980561,0.00693446,0.014815493,0.0039921985,0.007757618,0.0033905082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3096953,0.00086328323,0.0007404199,0.0014866543,0.07721174,0.010497879,0.010385413,0.010174272,0.0013158382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014082264,0.00009281482,0.0032663634,0.0007653331,0.0000759306,0.000292521,0.03050178,0.0011086037,0.000375261,0.8795128,0.01635094,0.067516916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011283671,0.0002914161,0.0016104359,0.0017123688,0.000057058434,0.00057841436,0.008219786,0.0018984259,0.0008279558,0.8376082,0.14700736,0.000075697135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016894323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022644815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31236592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008177005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01654973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84797525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998470554","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105902","title":"Pain versus suffering: a distinction currently without a difference","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nociception; Neglect; Psychology; Noxious stimulus; Pain management; Interpretation (philosophy); Medicine; Cognitive psychology; Anesthesia; Philosophy; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.19201187650700743,"score_gpt":0.545512322988399,"score_spread":0.35350044648139156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998470554","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02122731,0.036780667,0.024821678,0.6253644,0.0073927003,0.000049669412,0.00003907329,0.0000397206,0.2842848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.774906,0.017979525,0.011360637,0.1653654,0.008300605,0.00022655581,0.00004638896,0.00010900695,0.021705871],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876365,0.007868974,0.00045186054,0.00092800154,0.0021459567,0.00096873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896074,0.007528086,0.0006174955,0.0004564979,0.0010251289,0.00076543115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011243092,0.0004485725,0.0009847652,0.0011961579,0.005239224,0.0075815558,0.0019255523,0.006185312,0.0024857433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015343367,0.00026410914,0.0005083297,0.0007874108,0.05493286,0.016304253,0.0071759406,0.0128233265,0.00052232784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010783929,0.0000054321895,0.00007902239,0.00003017303,0.0000016108519,0.000035875673,0.005772362,0.000016400803,0.000042421256,0.9880101,0.002953095,0.0030426856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021782867,0.000034605095,0.0004571763,0.00044692348,0.000009762203,0.00029833236,0.008276298,0.000116674084,0.00013792112,0.8725996,0.11757864,0.000022256812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002563525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027782102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011243092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038724563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049006874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059459865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999165778","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105498","title":"Institutional conflict of interest: attempting to crack the deferiprone mystery","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Deferiprone; Harm; Benchmarking; Conflict of interest; Medicine; Context (archaeology); Research ethics; Informed consent; Family medicine; Alternative medicine; Law; Psychiatry; Political science; History; Business; Internal medicine; Pathology","score_opus":0.8777700041918854,"score_gpt":0.645740413460299,"score_spread":0.23202959073158647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999165778","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020346215,0.009689698,0.01711798,0.9269872,0.004003541,0.000084667154,0.00004507123,0.000037153015,0.021688646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64800334,0.0066162576,0.007956439,0.3282573,0.0051413733,0.00020272718,0.000044377408,0.00008737767,0.0036907978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8900064,0.08222718,0.004925766,0.004824642,0.01255556,0.0054603997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7198573,0.21506104,0.0233888,0.013136701,0.01827053,0.010285736],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09521337,0.00043374556,0.00084042875,0.0012962297,0.009249507,0.010818857,0.002743092,0.011257705,0.0046625924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21909347,0.0004523542,0.0007004778,0.0016042831,0.042192917,0.011303432,0.00944706,0.019658964,0.00064765435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007262196,0.00005874043,0.008418931,0.00048746384,0.0000938544,0.0031567812,0.070713684,0.00018572347,0.00021703172,0.8170966,0.057723794,0.04177474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065970205,0.00013634843,0.0045470437,0.0041755936,0.00008645477,0.0089890305,0.06945434,0.0010634703,0.00085552037,0.4882586,0.42221966,0.00014791226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027168298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034770307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9887423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006924866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016344873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5035424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3002608497","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105865","title":"Communities of practice: acknowledging vulnerability to improve resilience in healthcare teams","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Health care; Burnout; Psychology; Work (physics); Psychological resilience; Compassion fatigue; Perspective (graphical); Compassion; Resilience (materials science); Witness; Engineering ethics; Nursing; Knowledge management; Medicine; Social psychology; Political science; Computer science; Computer security; Engineering","score_opus":0.13426388710542903,"score_gpt":0.5375039715334836,"score_spread":0.4032400844280546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3002608497","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.618357,0.009954456,0.0501429,0.2381986,0.0030631064,0.001571393,0.0000649381,0.00043689078,0.07821074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9629434,0.0025290276,0.024255577,0.005806599,0.00026763527,0.0006213731,0.000034007742,0.000059848346,0.0034825571],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9599109,0.03221662,0.0008208391,0.0014986016,0.002783134,0.0027699054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95667493,0.0160598,0.0044585797,0.002584487,0.0035469758,0.016675144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025418375,0.00067672937,0.00059480866,0.0020715403,0.016714277,0.010601829,0.0025210788,0.0041163787,0.0058887904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05193283,0.00065258297,0.0011652207,0.00093715254,0.014056012,0.012404353,0.03257661,0.00475673,0.0009212615],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013054904,0.00091710006,0.017226245,0.001313907,0.00011517771,0.0024007123,0.72609687,0.0003855151,0.0016072232,0.02685595,0.016496342,0.20645443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014008801,0.0010661895,0.01623574,0.0057942574,0.000125709,0.0034118453,0.70615035,0.0012518733,0.00083594915,0.09682249,0.16796994,0.00019553443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002932459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068359394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025418375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043100277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027619129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13442677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004493427","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105866","title":"Decolonising ideas of healing in medical education","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Global Health and Surgery","field":"Medicine","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's Health Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sociology; Flourishing; Racism; Health care; Consumerism; Colonialism; Pluralism (philosophy); Cultural humility; Curriculum; Public relations; Political science; Engineering ethics; Gender studies; Cultural competence; Pedagogy; Psychology; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07757810093637647,"score_gpt":0.4629370808619998,"score_spread":0.38535897992562335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004493427","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17516634,0.031406544,0.02660768,0.42481136,0.0026584088,0.00014633664,0.00004249701,0.00013065581,0.3390302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96875215,0.0036378782,0.0039928677,0.011838964,0.0004573499,0.000052857216,0.000008889322,0.00003423208,0.011224834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855547,0.011547678,0.00031516244,0.00057972333,0.0011021326,0.000900512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98614734,0.009957341,0.0012687021,0.0009624569,0.00067272614,0.0009913811],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016425796,0.0003506884,0.00041380932,0.0020318562,0.0130653065,0.010338222,0.0011798902,0.004170983,0.0039579254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012747977,0.000275712,0.0003891866,0.0011401274,0.10985684,0.010090154,0.012382291,0.009873933,0.00046725565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024674231,0.000033767323,0.00056253327,0.00018640715,0.0000050635167,0.00018707161,0.3291059,0.00015495387,0.00030775755,0.65451247,0.0027656928,0.012153715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030194178,0.00013696226,0.001402575,0.001189436,0.000011872764,0.00062934245,0.23636258,0.00048247282,0.00062974764,0.2983508,0.46072343,0.00005056351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035165462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051042186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9869347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009961368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066271224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.086869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004964361","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105702","title":"Minority report: can minor parents refuse treatment for their child?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Wellcome Trust; Wellcome","keywords":"Minor (academic); Neglect; Discretion; Autonomy; Best interests; Psychology; Welfare; Social psychology; Medicine; Law; Political science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.16392755112368648,"score_gpt":0.4460267368020968,"score_spread":0.2820991856784103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004964361","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52467006,0.002657078,0.0019439117,0.3928365,0.001973895,0.00015505553,0.0003092664,0.000042313008,0.07541186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9229006,0.0025532355,0.00082223734,0.05439373,0.0008652679,0.00012913723,0.00013176564,0.00001979247,0.018184314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982821,0.0006718392,0.00017295658,0.0001576257,0.00038502412,0.00033059958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994259,0.0027554503,0.0012991221,0.00025974328,0.0006617853,0.00076484535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003920322,0.00016006327,0.00021409891,0.00027257166,0.0028410137,0.0015027848,0.0006970007,0.0028328893,0.0035035766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027242877,0.000117387644,0.00021775963,0.00023902438,0.0015402231,0.0017102584,0.002815451,0.0035767728,0.00047032448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016992987,0.00026018432,0.21767919,0.0003251473,0.000057056306,0.032396484,0.20908625,0.00033799215,0.0032672915,0.22471194,0.13638261,0.17532596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052022133,0.00033850383,0.06374113,0.0015929356,0.00011555932,0.040770803,0.21247795,0.0017345267,0.003961555,0.035195626,0.6398772,0.00014209567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012532922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012490323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012532922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015522223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028863284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024919927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007004323","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105859","title":"One health ethics: a response to pragmatism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Zoonotic diseases and public health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Normative; Vagueness; Epistemology; Articulation (sociology); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Engineering ethics; Management science; Computer science; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Artificial intelligence; Politics","score_opus":0.16331303589157947,"score_gpt":0.4622727494870138,"score_spread":0.29895971359543433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007004323","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009853628,0.0054636654,0.022561306,0.9210148,0.002010142,0.000043391618,0.000018568146,0.0000577959,0.038976848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6805242,0.0028150382,0.018443264,0.28338838,0.0028441267,0.00023832584,0.000026461888,0.00014993711,0.011570183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9075345,0.06677854,0.0031751718,0.006052364,0.01330999,0.0031494754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8477712,0.11989316,0.0070570214,0.009506605,0.011896472,0.003875666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.096483596,0.0007252849,0.0011880423,0.002016316,0.010112849,0.012108054,0.0036679269,0.029167408,0.002545903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11189061,0.0006609893,0.0013752609,0.0015689302,0.10039176,0.022271514,0.014772002,0.042828254,0.00055174535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011381887,0.000010984064,0.00011935131,0.000061574334,0.000004539616,0.00007991012,0.010569293,0.00011635295,0.00008972429,0.98030716,0.0057859193,0.0028437916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019979467,0.000022562797,0.00015129012,0.00035543603,0.000004988916,0.00015505018,0.0071154456,0.0005850369,0.00021235555,0.9110343,0.08031321,0.00003020653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025521903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00261697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096483596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011272789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014340514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5102601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013410412","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-106020","title":"Commentary on ‘Four types of gender bias affecting women surgeons, and their cumulative impact’ by Hutchison","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Diversity and Career in Medicine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Injustice; Implicit bias; Gender bias; Representation (politics); Psychology; Social psychology; Sex discrimination; Prejudice (legal term); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.14307503071990565,"score_gpt":0.383922980026222,"score_spread":0.24084794930631634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013410412","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00047577146,0.0015521711,0.00005144922,0.9837531,0.01351657,0.000004584456,0.000024931636,0.000013193849,0.00060817116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0055703814,0.0008306202,0.000089703,0.9765935,0.015023745,0.00003138801,0.000009808303,0.000027947091,0.0018229104],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98867655,0.0058049387,0.00083121017,0.001278628,0.0023964974,0.0010120743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94465244,0.040104344,0.0026046617,0.0010284615,0.00782918,0.0037809303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013686356,0.0010333734,0.0016570458,0.0010052961,0.008260985,0.004678164,0.0049906448,0.047875073,0.004788393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062542476,0.0012884199,0.0013245916,0.0015924067,0.0095915515,0.008753998,0.0028460436,0.050599825,0.0031467285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029146526,0.000006084441,0.00022042,0.00008632915,0.000007431793,0.00050408393,0.0020621968,0.000022622618,0.00006279261,0.00096253783,0.99387485,0.0021614986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048379407,0.00006943115,0.0016706726,0.0013312512,0.00003142487,0.0030722483,0.010627425,0.0002426586,0.00031454867,0.005540184,0.97689974,0.00015210711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03158219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02899604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047875073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007813061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010600098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07238126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014035919","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-106158","title":"Implicit bias, women surgeons and institutional solutions: commentary","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Diversity and Career in Medicine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Data science; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.1494513442587247,"score_gpt":0.36359232573195727,"score_spread":0.21414098147323257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014035919","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016765021,0.0010106756,0.000029769015,0.9880165,0.009720086,0.0000030008518,0.000007731394,0.0000054736392,0.0010392057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0055229156,0.0010919152,0.00007203191,0.973003,0.018188685,0.00002153206,0.0000068699414,0.0000131557335,0.0020799977],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9757036,0.011590975,0.0019145111,0.0021198527,0.006043842,0.0026272426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8844297,0.09173896,0.0037461375,0.002115935,0.013380252,0.004588981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021353118,0.0010198725,0.0015117049,0.0016614683,0.011149649,0.009142231,0.00915666,0.090299845,0.010413266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.104871936,0.00090593664,0.0019849243,0.0024988698,0.018067267,0.011576425,0.0063312976,0.070453584,0.004126078],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027453372,0.000013235964,0.00013487763,0.0002211669,0.000011184995,0.00065541494,0.0024907347,0.00004845441,0.000051853076,0.012799218,0.97869974,0.0048465687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006318534,0.00002832936,0.00058070756,0.0018029345,0.000031120304,0.0009726097,0.008053808,0.00022236616,0.00018221924,0.014908329,0.9730761,0.0000782553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027442915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03139782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.090299845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016923273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021570332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.122787476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014271418","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-106216","title":"Defending the distinction between pregnancy and parenthood","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Counterexample; Argumentative; Psychology; Pregnancy; Epistemology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.19240444746190496,"score_gpt":0.42055750491735533,"score_spread":0.22815305745545036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014271418","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06762892,0.022999067,0.058271036,0.489785,0.0059798094,0.00004621279,0.000057077483,0.00006411876,0.35516876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.923008,0.0037724914,0.008058057,0.04729772,0.0020944467,0.00010235725,0.000016383921,0.000060753544,0.015589803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.990827,0.006350085,0.00017418317,0.0010389823,0.0010873815,0.00052233675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927725,0.0055028345,0.0005244218,0.0004254989,0.00039187097,0.00038296543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014059574,0.00036378493,0.00045140935,0.0005202457,0.0038529765,0.0055297473,0.001645842,0.00738612,0.0023230398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015016581,0.00024880754,0.0004136192,0.00035773785,0.03233714,0.008171356,0.0062038433,0.010225821,0.00053465593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008408872,0.0000021868975,0.00012036021,0.000009675158,0.000001058901,0.00004770944,0.003919501,0.000019441832,0.000035521927,0.993016,0.0011336271,0.0016864622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026957274,0.000035151737,0.0005594434,0.00025838922,0.000010580256,0.00029441007,0.0045329346,0.00026887734,0.00032772621,0.87856704,0.115103774,0.000014701506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018988331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014306436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014059574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021961306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028875826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074355006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3018488496","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-106232","title":"Meaningful futility: requests for resuscitation against medical recommendation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; William Osler Health System","funders":"","keywords":"Existentialism; Psychology; Internet privacy; Medicine; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.38548304528496485,"score_gpt":0.5302068286167412,"score_spread":0.14472378333177632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3018488496","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01978592,0.0031627445,0.020481873,0.6926835,0.002915918,0.00039374427,0.00032588054,0.0003201917,0.2599302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6044023,0.0030149654,0.013233269,0.34020683,0.0027798829,0.00036231827,0.00021887127,0.00022903389,0.035552524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93746215,0.03615805,0.005339511,0.0020548129,0.014239525,0.004745958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88399863,0.08294617,0.009441866,0.006370063,0.012234761,0.0050084386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04110896,0.0004482831,0.0005545985,0.001000026,0.0065696933,0.008121609,0.0026818628,0.02018803,0.013823314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1598824,0.00050176436,0.0010228889,0.00085263775,0.012120951,0.0061235093,0.005598575,0.014927335,0.003047503],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012721634,0.00010959331,0.005602291,0.0004656119,0.00007230135,0.006425025,0.018150784,0.0006513942,0.0007833943,0.66068,0.2482026,0.058729764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008120286,0.00013453426,0.0063112704,0.0032042055,0.000088873654,0.007388713,0.01283344,0.001992721,0.0013587021,0.24500695,0.7213825,0.00021693492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04110896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015294092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035178185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21740752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3018952689","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105762","title":"Considering medical assistance in dying for minors: the complexities of children’s voices","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Children's Rights and Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Legislation; Deliberation; Context (archaeology); Agency (philosophy); Supreme court; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; History; Politics; Social science","score_opus":0.18046653222085493,"score_gpt":0.42534168230524694,"score_spread":0.244875150084392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3018952689","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17207,0.012222505,0.009302596,0.75439835,0.0030260568,0.00026670928,0.00007312045,0.000041581563,0.04859907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9112662,0.006189082,0.004775576,0.07160319,0.0009798346,0.00024203266,0.000019134593,0.0000469786,0.004878037],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.93745655,0.048924427,0.0023578834,0.0021212038,0.003470849,0.005669013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90247303,0.08304382,0.0038102297,0.0015211557,0.0038314825,0.005320271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06493863,0.00047451042,0.001180896,0.001133987,0.018283239,0.014382903,0.0027450284,0.012191256,0.0023136463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08413343,0.0006700532,0.001356347,0.00096467294,0.038248777,0.014413054,0.018929316,0.02622165,0.00035204436],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022361011,0.00002581224,0.0023381456,0.00027909037,0.000018473142,0.0029398056,0.8252399,0.00012066054,0.00046564214,0.14277458,0.009173296,0.016602263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011014967,0.000060458806,0.0020092332,0.002131289,0.000023881395,0.0035112519,0.7382815,0.00014414897,0.0005387345,0.035742108,0.21745872,0.000087714645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012921927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028531348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06493863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012085409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017300654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34343237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3019376897","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-106127","title":"In the name of science: animal appellations and best practice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Extant taxon; Psychology; Animal cognition; Animal welfare; Empathy; Epistemology; Social psychology; Political science; Cognition; Biology; Law","score_opus":0.33705102492054556,"score_gpt":0.5235440175295517,"score_spread":0.18649299260900615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3019376897","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02400494,0.09215896,0.03662398,0.73088336,0.005015332,0.00012330333,0.00003169994,0.00009709667,0.11106136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80458957,0.0337074,0.046618853,0.106711484,0.0023791196,0.00040199712,0.000046790108,0.00015937755,0.0053852675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.62136614,0.3159749,0.013957377,0.011058228,0.033313785,0.0043296013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.52517587,0.38121775,0.03977853,0.026279183,0.020784806,0.006763911],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.21961612,0.0006907024,0.0016801666,0.0053124772,0.0133798765,0.025892822,0.0048675514,0.021125311,0.0038822428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27738243,0.0008976741,0.001105118,0.0063279835,0.15592976,0.03171282,0.015783671,0.019855622,0.0011082313],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007924245,0.000084294756,0.002643025,0.0014881279,0.000053197356,0.00047044634,0.105967626,0.00022750754,0.0002513305,0.81288606,0.017187083,0.058661968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035642814,0.00013745036,0.0021370165,0.011043179,0.00005497078,0.00088500575,0.06506031,0.0003801088,0.000504729,0.6768891,0.24277453,0.00009794005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036124776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041540973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21961612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01447801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020336162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9623523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022335197","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105758","title":"Becoming a medical assistance in dying (MAiD) provider: an exploration of the conditions that produce conscientious participation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Hamilton Health Sciences; London Health Sciences Centre; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Supreme court; Narrative; Context (archaeology); Taboo; Identity (music); Diversity (politics); Sociology; Qualitative research; Public relations; Law; Psychology; Nursing; Political science; Medicine; Social science; Aesthetics; History","score_opus":0.4504026941685684,"score_gpt":0.5768303361776258,"score_spread":0.12642764200905743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022335197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9744279,0.0010245476,0.0010385785,0.008833563,0.00008351383,0.00009194883,0.000022530881,0.000008370195,0.014468962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972155,0.0006598238,0.00051360944,0.00078242033,0.00002225918,0.000045737816,0.000011777255,0.000008604288,0.0007401906],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98446333,0.012125317,0.0003204579,0.0003741379,0.001259225,0.0014574439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96064866,0.030867623,0.0034988832,0.0007178835,0.0012075091,0.0030595069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0136580365,0.00031070499,0.00034640863,0.0018967116,0.013362356,0.0076153195,0.0014684378,0.0019154915,0.002043708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029271446,0.00050957064,0.00038878762,0.0012556926,0.027314983,0.0064363945,0.010529195,0.0041780635,0.0001668202],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010844077,0.000034209417,0.0046942662,0.00009135824,0.0000024602493,0.0010384034,0.98439044,0.000012647278,0.00011945055,0.0046874126,0.00046235623,0.004456162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023963,0.000017324523,0.0035547803,0.00017995482,0.000002441534,0.00041362658,0.9899014,0.000035632635,0.0000587883,0.0013680629,0.0044578877,0.00000766936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011094539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03231385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0136580365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007716744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014660781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07223141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025127070","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-106048","title":"Trust, trustworthiness and sharing patient data for research","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Affect (linguistics); Coproduction; Argumentative; Public relations; Trustworthiness; Data sharing; Task (project management); Computer science; Internet privacy; Political science; Psychology; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.9050580209888535,"score_gpt":0.7105736966228733,"score_spread":0.19448432436598018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3025127070","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0397391,0.010714267,0.106532454,0.76631147,0.001879439,0.00049597083,0.000083827195,0.00013245181,0.07411106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9314611,0.003912661,0.026781503,0.033015247,0.0010810439,0.00059717655,0.00004242164,0.00011620365,0.0029926877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.39330795,0.52438706,0.02556237,0.012330666,0.034114704,0.010297234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3577117,0.50696707,0.045221668,0.0515815,0.025073087,0.013444926],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.38809398,0.0007292468,0.0022511156,0.0040952647,0.016432462,0.03043395,0.0051494315,0.021721624,0.0022074706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4267843,0.0018261838,0.0017265717,0.004161426,0.15852211,0.045219257,0.024069257,0.020624317,0.00080753164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006634247,0.000044494627,0.0017481871,0.0003664242,0.000090135356,0.00033705286,0.07644842,0.00073066936,0.00015940874,0.9012868,0.006061591,0.01266047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064964144,0.00010545698,0.0009552696,0.0014446422,0.000052232528,0.00043704783,0.018909344,0.0010075517,0.00045789705,0.92610836,0.05031922,0.00013805328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009372757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005298735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61190605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018658375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050031494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7545891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3027748832","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-106278","title":"What healthcare professionals owe us: why their duty to treat during a pandemic is contingent on personal protective equipment (PPE)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Disaster Response and Management","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Personal protective equipment; Health care; Pandemic; Duty; Obligation; Business; Politics; Public relations; Medicine; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Disease; Law","score_opus":0.20089245256139923,"score_gpt":0.494825231207298,"score_spread":0.29393277864589873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3027748832","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010940997,0.0058874907,0.0031894227,0.95933825,0.0050578425,0.000020016998,0.000012185535,0.000013513393,0.015540306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4221301,0.009769551,0.0041495217,0.5485611,0.0062811878,0.00005710021,0.000017650229,0.00004713322,0.008986749],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.984059,0.010757882,0.00081587606,0.0009035271,0.001756815,0.0017068671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9733329,0.018270973,0.0025613778,0.00087464834,0.0029523142,0.0020078828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017648207,0.00035390744,0.0004079834,0.00051584165,0.008246496,0.008785211,0.0012166348,0.015457522,0.0026985134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03889133,0.00035326343,0.00042767223,0.00043216717,0.02582055,0.0070892894,0.004427453,0.01599137,0.0012097872],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001422421,0.0001925226,0.00893773,0.0006155895,0.000045259294,0.0024496994,0.12991646,0.0004661416,0.0018161589,0.5352333,0.24528496,0.07490004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040420065,0.00019038828,0.0050197393,0.0026570985,0.00003850713,0.0045370413,0.13346455,0.0009779959,0.0015096733,0.32350728,0.52783716,0.0002201429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005110751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065471875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017648207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004483742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012140677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09333372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035163907","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-106320","title":"Triage of critical care resources in COVID-19: a stronger role for justice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Disaster Response and Management","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Dalhousie University","keywords":"Triage; Equity (law); Resource allocation; Health care rationing; Assertion; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Economic Justice; Distributive justice; Psychology; Public relations; Medicine; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; Health care; Medical emergency; Law; Management","score_opus":0.2317662887747113,"score_gpt":0.5526221910036272,"score_spread":0.3208559022289159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035163907","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004406528,0.0002815185,0.000108880486,0.9926133,0.0032716165,0.0000073548285,0.0000069537423,0.000006424644,0.0032633727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032580763,0.00012751608,0.0001465814,0.9893332,0.0044368445,0.000018434226,0.0000038151916,0.000008953674,0.0026665097],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9798779,0.0065764803,0.0020162784,0.0027024809,0.004841397,0.0039854753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9509576,0.033381272,0.001729594,0.0011350432,0.005773759,0.007022715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022124043,0.00072899286,0.0016475172,0.0008354974,0.021356797,0.01588031,0.004665873,0.16501293,0.0086966185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05884692,0.0012926388,0.0022628629,0.000850438,0.016728366,0.013651846,0.008136349,0.11887898,0.003936574],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007084341,0.00008161541,0.0011225273,0.00010873989,0.00002244075,0.003798786,0.0031037703,0.00016934394,0.0005398806,0.07554259,0.9026719,0.012767553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001249176,0.00012410965,0.0014598141,0.0009697075,0.000026671447,0.00228956,0.0053298934,0.00104513,0.00044592508,0.074136816,0.9138663,0.00018116477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02958649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06061039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16501293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01536488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03757753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.117004514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038525376","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-106047","title":"Value promotion as a goal of medicine","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Health; Alberta Health Services","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Promotion (chess); Value (mathematics); Organ donation; Extant taxon; Evidence-based medicine; Public relations; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Alternative medicine; Medicine; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Transplantation; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.28570191978815423,"score_gpt":0.5955445980730166,"score_spread":0.3098426782848624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038525376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02677555,0.0057639093,0.113318525,0.27040553,0.0019163558,0.00019629291,0.00004034645,0.00015935842,0.5814241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93036705,0.001951569,0.022226498,0.02718712,0.0011134056,0.00029069433,0.000025105786,0.0001087818,0.016729811],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96275806,0.025154063,0.00082339667,0.0023779192,0.0066330303,0.0022536307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96621287,0.017373007,0.003414494,0.0035296632,0.004540308,0.0049297083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03903872,0.00075556873,0.000802407,0.0019490552,0.008500139,0.01781903,0.0014727567,0.010515687,0.002946887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023411522,0.00056413055,0.00092528923,0.001056176,0.089066155,0.014153585,0.013429027,0.01242767,0.0012505506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000736255,0.000021801976,0.00024691745,0.000037062156,0.0000032972112,0.000029865372,0.0037741223,0.000062985295,0.000096363496,0.9916155,0.0013925626,0.0027121718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017128034,0.000043393167,0.00033643976,0.00029105204,0.000009374395,0.00012238561,0.002264689,0.00031013164,0.00031756825,0.9204541,0.07580795,0.000025937105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001594842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014411927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03903872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005486383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0137476595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20645893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3052480326","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-106719","title":"Is it unethical to publish data from Chinese transplant research?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Publication; Appeal; China; Argument (complex analysis); Publishing; Research ethics; Law; Medical ethics; Criminology; Political science; Medicine; Psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.3610681569847575,"score_gpt":0.5023686128895674,"score_spread":0.14130045590480983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3052480326","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016954662,0.007157279,0.0023811567,0.97703767,0.008403302,0.00012244165,0.00009949244,0.00004432792,0.0030587711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.053797897,0.008663876,0.005202241,0.9147602,0.014412568,0.0007267542,0.000119855955,0.00012744202,0.002189155],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.5277662,0.28188884,0.06606385,0.019124495,0.09542704,0.00972961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.16301866,0.6480161,0.05916089,0.051778752,0.06655051,0.01147508],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.4294332,0.0006492492,0.0025284966,0.005421747,0.009407944,0.030386638,0.008294343,0.029326236,0.006180612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6789097,0.0018376032,0.003415274,0.00553189,0.058772914,0.026401669,0.014071728,0.029604109,0.00286577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00090798514,0.00012497876,0.014913372,0.012719197,0.0019659249,0.0028292288,0.06569096,0.00035421996,0.0017347488,0.26386553,0.42325306,0.2116408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041646813,0.00034381243,0.008681834,0.026387833,0.0008697716,0.0026817,0.017912086,0.0011174938,0.0028638456,0.17455935,0.7635353,0.0006305164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0088325655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008435339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97067374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017098319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058988765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7036104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081642488","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-106530","title":"Public involvement in the governance of population-level biomedical research: unresolved questions and future directions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; McGill University","funders":"National Institute for Health and Care Research; Wellcome Trust; Wellcome","keywords":"Corporate governance; Public relations; Population; Stakeholder; Value pluralism; Political science; Public health; Research ethics; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Business; Medicine; Politics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.7802038985801858,"score_gpt":0.6038874730519642,"score_spread":0.17631642552822158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081642488","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026419368,0.016576167,0.035391584,0.8956733,0.0012228636,0.00025060025,0.00003632165,0.00007481516,0.024355013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.899119,0.014053764,0.030426422,0.050446775,0.0016237483,0.001033507,0.000070728354,0.00011565191,0.0031103818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6932207,0.27147767,0.0065648267,0.00632559,0.010710118,0.0117011545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6317404,0.29155445,0.019598246,0.02033816,0.019426517,0.017342266],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2515214,0.0006649402,0.001762581,0.002294213,0.011712709,0.028826432,0.0053568087,0.014759951,0.0053046867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20371485,0.0011116359,0.0013330836,0.0037856211,0.058730777,0.045479923,0.022501133,0.01658952,0.000744551],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006282202,0.0002517604,0.0090188235,0.0011472437,0.000058443304,0.000548478,0.09689729,0.0010421623,0.00020875235,0.80835897,0.008735593,0.07366961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044925488,0.00010270295,0.0035670751,0.0039834776,0.000038711576,0.00038754256,0.1258993,0.0014314108,0.00029082096,0.77963495,0.08451627,0.00010273998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052177813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050217384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98828727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011935473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04554374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92300737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088056573","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-106504","title":"SARS-CoV-2 challenge studies: ethics and risk minimisation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Research ethics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Public health; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Ethical issues; Risk assessment; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Psychology; Psychiatry; Computer science; Nursing; Disease; Pathology","score_opus":0.36934024980375346,"score_gpt":0.5119479436296944,"score_spread":0.14260769382594096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088056573","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030013556,0.030376984,0.06650221,0.82759565,0.005389421,0.0042458177,0.000102544785,0.00007494384,0.03569885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56344455,0.034006797,0.14536384,0.22205386,0.009936219,0.013368858,0.0001636874,0.00013078318,0.011531405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.48259705,0.4674385,0.01705064,0.0048239473,0.024459425,0.003630424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.45431423,0.44788432,0.025680816,0.02965111,0.02761975,0.014849755],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.40986714,0.00066285755,0.001686282,0.001543786,0.007573309,0.015175209,0.0036372358,0.015924951,0.0022477135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36118007,0.0008919894,0.0011903935,0.0011928134,0.030689156,0.010231398,0.012842603,0.016981957,0.0010997013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007114786,0.00062127353,0.010466679,0.004466553,0.00030036122,0.0020755206,0.10632401,0.001643451,0.0024692495,0.6023443,0.064084396,0.20449276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034312712,0.0014629043,0.0057639247,0.0139811775,0.00015234962,0.0029784632,0.038909893,0.0020302979,0.0026708895,0.543079,0.3883419,0.00028597252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012243267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002796099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98407507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005256634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051288787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72773886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094346900","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-106458","title":"US direct-to-consumer medical service advertisements fail to provide adequate information on quality and cost of care","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Advertising; Business; Quality (philosophy); Service (business); Commission; Quarter (Canadian coin); Service quality; Scarcity; Marketing; Internet privacy; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.5602299360378633,"score_gpt":0.6115383656162602,"score_spread":0.051308429578396875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094346900","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93855965,0.00579219,0.0027091212,0.0036390878,0.0001542799,0.0003046006,0.0059523443,0.00010877289,0.042779878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98862165,0.0024496517,0.0031903265,0.0015197148,0.00019754797,0.000111367604,0.0018540145,0.000025272298,0.0020304974],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99023086,0.0036635743,0.0011810806,0.00042224684,0.004249476,0.00025277314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8920814,0.065129645,0.021982545,0.003752757,0.016301405,0.0007522099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007725202,0.00022775844,0.00032310394,0.0042908085,0.00056493585,0.001968522,0.00040244803,0.0005640685,0.0051340964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04712241,0.00026654926,0.00017997496,0.004517034,0.0007932407,0.0010203779,0.00057205156,0.00039125362,0.0011734136],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045846068,0.0002646117,0.7930536,0.0015184963,0.0001571849,0.0001647012,0.003036454,0.00020783897,0.0022102823,0.0017582189,0.00977517,0.18739493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024623741,0.0002208514,0.96055937,0.000567712,0.00018810836,0.0006569467,0.0027814123,0.00094320247,0.0032011953,0.0007650931,0.030069808,0.000021697118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010467772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011663362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010467772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014035953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013079846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04085529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3097868833","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-106894","title":"Emotional support animals are not like prosthetics: a response to Sara Kolmes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Function (biology); Human body; Psychology; Emotional support; Internet privacy; Social psychology; Computer science; Social support; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1839813684863966,"score_gpt":0.40333287098006315,"score_spread":0.21935150249366656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3097868833","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044291097,0.0007535527,0.000050017516,0.99382126,0.0039804303,0.000002478791,0.0000047956746,0.000007668247,0.0009368734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0059804656,0.00044945037,0.00011008542,0.9876365,0.0040413863,0.000013768468,0.0000024998697,0.000010164807,0.0017557853],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99398404,0.002810235,0.0004533707,0.0008320441,0.0013679353,0.00055232254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9801793,0.014871594,0.000665003,0.00049476436,0.002021368,0.0017679564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008499593,0.00071959884,0.0014481635,0.0005256474,0.007022049,0.00441026,0.0019809683,0.057868388,0.0033772446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04245831,0.00076647644,0.00094490673,0.0005011724,0.008412985,0.0075102933,0.0024267456,0.08377046,0.0029957355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008900857,0.000065275875,0.0004898918,0.000073936084,0.00001872516,0.0035575172,0.0022319697,0.0000683945,0.0004096761,0.01362165,0.9691469,0.010227096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094085626,0.00018599966,0.0013224662,0.0007863882,0.00003883791,0.011132496,0.00821521,0.0008148406,0.00064199173,0.037460655,0.93912727,0.00017975036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053116307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075749294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057868388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005494147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047887154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044950664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3099289353","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-106676","title":"Is there room for privacy in medical crowdfunding?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficiary; Internet privacy; Popularity; Inclusion (mineral); Business; Information privacy; Public relations; Personally identifiable information; Political science; Psychology; Computer security; Computer science; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.0912174445571097,"score_gpt":0.3496901688720093,"score_spread":0.25847272431489965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3099289353","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33629066,0.013480837,0.035093978,0.49580762,0.0016527036,0.00037203621,0.0006118588,0.00019559466,0.11649465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9512801,0.0041293767,0.008758864,0.03090239,0.0007295264,0.00026847477,0.00013664819,0.0000894854,0.0037050566],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93663,0.05195106,0.0014564551,0.0022068962,0.005108059,0.0026474826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8726781,0.09841138,0.014089374,0.0068627857,0.0042834915,0.003674842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036964122,0.00040249137,0.0006812104,0.0014289505,0.009355457,0.013201741,0.0016449601,0.0044510136,0.0092926165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11220667,0.00066485937,0.0011746656,0.0014328544,0.022841685,0.019435843,0.009782107,0.006313964,0.00106922],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028154277,0.00015082349,0.05057542,0.0018321902,0.00014998353,0.0032172059,0.61243266,0.0003262708,0.0011703013,0.14103407,0.031274468,0.15755498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007970337,0.00024421618,0.020788172,0.0056135906,0.00015666001,0.0065703136,0.47201174,0.00109372,0.0014640818,0.14524573,0.34655738,0.0001747257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041904137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005109939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036964122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036849685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075962157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19548726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108729998","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-106768","title":"Problems and development strategies for research ethics committees in China’s higher education institutions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lagging; China; Reputation; Research ethics; Ethics committee; Higher education; Political science; Engineering ethics; Public administration; Public relations; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.871481509397553,"score_gpt":0.6862750441626324,"score_spread":0.18520646523492057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108729998","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062692516,0.014838733,0.07234644,0.7947641,0.004502419,0.008578344,0.00015839296,0.00053933065,0.041579764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6227385,0.0062240707,0.2102246,0.11131817,0.0030217066,0.012434242,0.0003460867,0.00019335214,0.033499327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.7550635,0.17159238,0.017026981,0.010311825,0.028564377,0.017440947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.65668315,0.1343087,0.0289195,0.020133229,0.10438465,0.055570744],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.30208036,0.0012532007,0.0012304562,0.005497285,0.015446407,0.019115733,0.007999127,0.011773853,0.005393083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20721233,0.00164806,0.0016899558,0.00401827,0.013459744,0.012571618,0.01524979,0.013999473,0.0012095488],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016188849,0.0005222008,0.031283285,0.0022799845,0.00017937647,0.0026681293,0.03490174,0.0032694093,0.0019756223,0.5935711,0.105403125,0.22378418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008052243,0.00064012536,0.034909163,0.008314273,0.00021423874,0.0018830397,0.050862174,0.014021205,0.0035752596,0.26410374,0.62006503,0.0006065309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020085424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0200342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9882262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03376589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21818157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8606592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110938766","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-106927","title":"Considering sex robots for older adults with cognitive impairments","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto; University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Psychology; Robot; Duty; Human sexuality; Narrative; Cognition; Quality of life (healthcare); Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Psychotherapist; Psychiatry; Sociology","score_opus":0.0896405490381657,"score_gpt":0.41489036537497387,"score_spread":0.32524981633680816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110938766","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.119958505,0.031584978,0.002432244,0.7783015,0.005947382,0.00011469883,0.000050347084,0.000031827396,0.061578583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63948756,0.026651831,0.0029787836,0.31098735,0.004396724,0.00023956904,0.000047714217,0.000036244066,0.015174123],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915269,0.005658238,0.0003101547,0.0002173643,0.0010554636,0.0012318726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99058455,0.0050146207,0.00097290584,0.00022668648,0.0011129046,0.002088291],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010272247,0.0002783957,0.0003912452,0.00050709635,0.0096822055,0.004742289,0.0009984837,0.008920127,0.004376247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021226497,0.0002158856,0.0007011053,0.00036382294,0.009859581,0.006427223,0.005133337,0.008815167,0.0007510687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102549915,0.00027479028,0.019407414,0.0009356178,0.00005491944,0.009951111,0.48396137,0.00022155789,0.0011222734,0.07674873,0.19536321,0.2118565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022476146,0.0002510342,0.0071045407,0.0028982903,0.000036615187,0.006629516,0.40828583,0.0001487405,0.0004880247,0.03039599,0.54367214,0.000066779954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005712685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015924517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010272247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031005058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008518041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05432552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117972040","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-106654","title":"Applying futility in psychiatry: a concept whose time has come","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto; University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Connotation; Psychological intervention; Mental illness; Psychiatry; Intervention (counseling); Psychology; Quality of life (healthcare); Ontology; Medicine; Psychotherapist; Nursing; Mental health; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14583982923062566,"score_gpt":0.3627292280941017,"score_spread":0.21688939886347602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117972040","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011741704,0.3088698,0.08695113,0.51821303,0.009162477,0.00013166414,0.000057558213,0.000103378465,0.06476924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6069401,0.2056879,0.03764723,0.11803301,0.02341535,0.00070986326,0.000052124822,0.00018545035,0.0073290123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96661466,0.02650915,0.0013033873,0.0013642107,0.003338618,0.0008699862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.902276,0.08529726,0.0041868743,0.0027614906,0.0032291391,0.0022492667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037443526,0.0012770516,0.00200553,0.0043805144,0.0071069263,0.013372935,0.0023411466,0.011933011,0.002727006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04365328,0.0005072815,0.001322249,0.0040680603,0.13596572,0.021797478,0.011267651,0.020603377,0.0005003137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002711423,0.000020134717,0.00036751718,0.0004900327,0.000022699684,0.00024393667,0.011862741,0.000378519,0.0000999887,0.9553099,0.004762891,0.026414469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014841369,0.00007291877,0.00036167965,0.0020357086,0.000015626922,0.0006283522,0.0044917744,0.00045254818,0.00013334083,0.9024032,0.08932402,0.00006600377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032272206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024775206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037443526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011902533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19802272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132058775","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-107193","title":"Against vaccine nationalism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Health and Conflict Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Binghamton University; Carnegie Mellon University","keywords":"Population; Nationalism; Poverty; European union; Human rights; Political science; Economic growth; Medicine; Development economics; Business; Economics; Law; International trade; Environmental health","score_opus":0.23841606954129377,"score_gpt":0.5370109722722486,"score_spread":0.2985949027309548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132058775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009747266,0.013582732,0.0069001867,0.42972225,0.013697671,0.0001342391,0.00013592541,0.00019715243,0.5258826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23061092,0.005951223,0.00443295,0.6580846,0.0059723216,0.0004181314,0.00017103387,0.00023249669,0.09412635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.984209,0.006552266,0.0006110972,0.0025321776,0.0040699095,0.002025455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879539,0.005441208,0.0013788703,0.0016621363,0.002218748,0.0013451304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021125548,0.0007100482,0.0008481127,0.0010670912,0.007888882,0.0075476547,0.0015527338,0.011896225,0.011020591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03304698,0.00039185048,0.000624573,0.000594602,0.02593128,0.009467442,0.0099890055,0.020725546,0.0033193675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026141124,0.000026992393,0.00062011083,0.000107659565,0.000016601864,0.000088598215,0.004273565,0.00007066388,0.00020194353,0.86651903,0.10687202,0.021176655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023359933,0.000049390106,0.0003390894,0.00046644962,0.0000131303805,0.00020373527,0.0009960618,0.00013752839,0.00034484506,0.13614173,0.86126804,0.00001665925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00413219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003739852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021125548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038374441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007968721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1117239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132525839","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-106690","title":"How individual ethical frameworks shape physician trainees’ experiences providing end-of-life care: a qualitative study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Family Medicine","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Thematic analysis; End-of-life care; Context (archaeology); Qualitative research; Psychology; Health care; Nursing; Experiential learning; Medical education; Medicine; Palliative care; Sociology; Pedagogy; Political science","score_opus":0.22755541042328947,"score_gpt":0.5159303400838924,"score_spread":0.2883749296606029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132525839","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.991514,0.00043620702,0.0023798782,0.002314844,0.00004015748,0.00009505715,0.00006517245,0.000012080021,0.0031426558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962186,0.00043557622,0.0008096353,0.0007335933,0.000017025906,0.00011976839,0.000026068135,0.000014866922,0.0016249084],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881386,0.008971681,0.00022208809,0.00048048678,0.0006933423,0.0014938263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9766426,0.01795252,0.0016528754,0.0004013922,0.0012073532,0.0021432864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012438602,0.0003027268,0.0004958535,0.00085172465,0.005999352,0.0030586715,0.0012893577,0.0015607241,0.0027141052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020634431,0.00053471606,0.000289355,0.0010579404,0.008471594,0.0031608215,0.004202465,0.00257643,0.0002563281],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020604215,0.000026857153,0.0024033044,0.000077498386,0.0000026069315,0.00063679856,0.9932569,0.000034569595,0.00039776939,0.00054982497,0.0003309877,0.002262239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004084971,0.00004588826,0.0017699425,0.00014915742,0.000003311794,0.0004168894,0.9916707,0.000076128636,0.00021080194,0.00019314003,0.0054486175,0.000011373067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007047623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012532352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012438602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035395354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005531045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06578237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135588960","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107315","title":"Canadian perspective on ageism and selective lockdown: a response to Savulescu and Cameron","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Challenges","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Expansive; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Public policy; Psychology; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Medicine; Computer science; Disease","score_opus":0.11080585898439446,"score_gpt":0.510747608689106,"score_spread":0.3999417497047115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135588960","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000433729,0.002722248,0.00008338174,0.9908393,0.00219082,0.000004088414,0.000014161253,0.00000432456,0.0037078257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01362527,0.00222806,0.00021681873,0.9778568,0.001369603,0.00001157159,0.000008558043,0.000021400894,0.00466192],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9746413,0.00598441,0.000840448,0.0031873626,0.009493903,0.0058524576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9566971,0.019281756,0.0013287839,0.00088349555,0.01304723,0.008761638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022257278,0.0011176473,0.0019815124,0.0018535755,0.04237381,0.013676389,0.007251376,0.05997865,0.008754413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041392248,0.0010682743,0.0019561502,0.003381814,0.05161689,0.012807599,0.008089781,0.07756662,0.001144294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044767447,0.000030228231,0.00054504845,0.00010470609,0.00001808658,0.00056805485,0.015750915,0.00011282692,0.00015108986,0.15543187,0.8205258,0.0067166733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006150309,0.00002472303,0.0013999653,0.00063535065,0.000021211643,0.00037613977,0.021349141,0.00017993705,0.00016845812,0.03433022,0.9412617,0.00019166716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9174964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9385002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.103424296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.103424296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16525973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7503993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139447385","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-106764","title":"Towards collective moral resilience: the potential of communities of practice during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"National Cancer Institute","keywords":"Psychological resilience; Resilience (materials science); Psychology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Health care; Sociology; Distress; Moral disengagement; Social psychology; Morality; Political science; Medicine; Law; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.17571738631089245,"score_gpt":0.5367515744442065,"score_spread":0.36103418813331406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139447385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45506498,0.005538277,0.1307861,0.13766293,0.0021110075,0.0006626313,0.000062888794,0.00040352886,0.26770753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795985,0.00050594506,0.012948451,0.0019234063,0.00016605562,0.00018074295,0.000017767074,0.000061330225,0.0045977654],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.950415,0.040597614,0.0006414958,0.0027670667,0.0027017759,0.0028770294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9567217,0.02225414,0.0045583756,0.0057591153,0.00292253,0.0077841096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031146897,0.0007283437,0.0007044594,0.0030531264,0.021019688,0.016591989,0.0031601198,0.0068702074,0.0061024013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047267854,0.00063701,0.0011120966,0.001133319,0.06893533,0.017857,0.037666418,0.006491916,0.0008509171],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056257857,0.0001223232,0.004059199,0.00026095365,0.000039516566,0.0012470648,0.67201626,0.0007485815,0.0009623887,0.27403593,0.0040040337,0.042447604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045389548,0.00022319391,0.0031056383,0.00094582123,0.000030094307,0.0011457521,0.42597517,0.0017348031,0.0005162079,0.39154926,0.1746084,0.000120247445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024703825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003486102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031146897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005086027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012904683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1647225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3145166337","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-106959","title":"WHO guidance on ethics in outbreaks and the COVID-19 pandemic: a critical appraisal","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Outbreak; Isolation (microbiology); Relevance (law); Political science; Politics; Public relations; Disease; Engineering ethics; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Medicine; Virology; Law; Biology; Pathology","score_opus":0.19727132176242887,"score_gpt":0.5292050504695699,"score_spread":0.331933728707141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3145166337","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00093653915,0.076679535,0.0025702012,0.8926695,0.00760228,0.0003510056,0.00008625191,0.000051769133,0.019052932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08965878,0.21724226,0.027554834,0.6354966,0.014673992,0.0024552383,0.00042806208,0.00034437835,0.012145835],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.76226425,0.16715005,0.019182947,0.00232263,0.0409131,0.008167013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.55301994,0.33880615,0.015360107,0.0063867695,0.07702948,0.009397573],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.18832469,0.0019467258,0.0022481487,0.00694789,0.008150519,0.01797008,0.0060062995,0.024562402,0.0030778165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.30650797,0.0012771672,0.0027348357,0.005113179,0.020396536,0.018003765,0.011777116,0.02680216,0.0014448639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058111662,0.000080667975,0.0005834531,0.0068380106,0.00006504729,0.001289566,0.038853556,0.00077250396,0.00017160884,0.15820624,0.6917438,0.10133746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028270219,0.000052952604,0.0005182513,0.04914668,0.000052761254,0.0007007043,0.02289031,0.00031766744,0.000194923,0.051477373,0.87452096,0.000099166995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020355009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027196972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9754376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027626492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10976158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99596804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152556357","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-107133","title":"Making a case for the inclusion of refractory and severe mental illness as a sole criterion for Canadians requesting medical assistance in dying (MAiD): a review","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Voluntariness; Mental illness; Legislation; Psychiatry; Inclusion (mineral); Assisted suicide; Legislature; Psychology; Medicine; Law; Social psychology; Mental health; Political science","score_opus":0.23152948901470644,"score_gpt":0.5641383774669065,"score_spread":0.3326088884522001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152556357","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020750439,0.9952878,0.00009521531,0.0029827408,0.00034886823,0.000029699278,0.00006250712,0.0000035398075,0.0009822114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004099206,0.992831,0.00040085232,0.0022851327,0.00017599814,0.000029983594,0.0000700759,0.000003405474,0.00010441855],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99472433,0.0010953685,0.0013388572,0.0004000237,0.0020983682,0.00034294964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96385384,0.020142822,0.0029625497,0.00044095056,0.011551881,0.0010479703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009274987,0.00061869866,0.0019707829,0.009177155,0.002273478,0.0038329952,0.0025700734,0.0028565477,0.002287489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039924685,0.0004940369,0.0020002364,0.010585475,0.0028737795,0.0021040856,0.0014210538,0.0025610367,0.000282802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120713135,0.000038531456,0.004005818,0.23730776,0.0007498099,0.00047287098,0.0016534508,0.00032030366,0.00026943182,0.013777098,0.06924317,0.67204106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037811296,0.000062087885,0.008947544,0.35244814,0.0019950129,0.0012213176,0.0015593942,0.00019400478,0.0001644029,0.002093458,0.6311811,0.000095628784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4948843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66564196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5051157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019148251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10291137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98400754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161506523","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107255","title":"Ethical decision making during a healthcare crisis: a resource allocation framework and tool","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Disaster Response and Management","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; University of Toronto; University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Accountability; Resource (disambiguation); Resource allocation; Health care rationing; Stakeholder; Inefficiency; Process (computing); Scarcity; Business; Knowledge management; Public relations; Management science; Process management; Computer science; Political science; Economics; Law; Management","score_opus":0.09536733993779849,"score_gpt":0.5126833439727734,"score_spread":0.4173160040349749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161506523","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008227661,0.0010245782,0.8444509,0.056308735,0.000846443,0.0040774653,0.00033827833,0.0016394008,0.08308655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.056677252,0.0006735271,0.9334796,0.0024590904,0.00015907819,0.0028674682,0.0002712455,0.00016698077,0.0032456855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7821417,0.18524681,0.012013516,0.0042888117,0.0125583215,0.0037508989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69779235,0.25545353,0.008567575,0.00949249,0.019024106,0.009669984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.18708621,0.0031749227,0.002033155,0.01746085,0.013683621,0.0371903,0.0087440405,0.01253526,0.009403747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15593286,0.0019052114,0.0032597245,0.010109861,0.0433127,0.036409512,0.030840017,0.016648427,0.0035588024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007137984,0.0005612757,0.0015986025,0.0012133063,0.00006398613,0.0011358558,0.048677757,0.006834042,0.0005527521,0.8133719,0.023196774,0.102722235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000099323224,0.00015692474,0.0005086181,0.0040131207,0.000061759354,0.00077509816,0.035175618,0.017690541,0.00094075955,0.76072186,0.17959255,0.0002639285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003073851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004759112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18708621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018074112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041610193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98941827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177743850","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107311","title":"Family experiences with non-therapeutic research on dying patients in the intensive care unit","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Blood Services; University of Ottawa; Western University; Carleton University; Ottawa Hospital; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario","funders":"Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program","keywords":"Informed consent; Donation; Thematic analysis; Organ donation; Medicine; Affect (linguistics); Family medicine; Next of kin; Intensive care unit; Protocol (science); Psychology; Qualitative research; Nursing; Alternative medicine; Transplantation; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.4985360182665989,"score_gpt":0.5707120539559449,"score_spread":0.07217603568934605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177743850","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9798544,0.0023683545,0.0031733913,0.008174444,0.00017251117,0.000094286675,0.00003470575,0.000029824017,0.0060980995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970289,0.0007023143,0.00045939398,0.00088168785,0.00004059889,0.00004923868,0.000011549151,0.000011328332,0.00081504503],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9271377,0.067265816,0.0011740677,0.0009134929,0.0015664317,0.0019425519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92057973,0.060856447,0.0075484933,0.0019329328,0.0028541815,0.0062282225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02815147,0.0006239197,0.00092674716,0.0009985665,0.013023763,0.005265593,0.0017048125,0.0029112606,0.0036822525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06387268,0.00062080676,0.0007847426,0.00078103074,0.020138176,0.0061538056,0.008322132,0.004505958,0.0004740845],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010628842,0.000043060012,0.002823857,0.000119518554,0.000016388874,0.0027595595,0.9870882,0.00008811829,0.00041302756,0.0017543696,0.0006761843,0.00411131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000143413245,0.00020879574,0.0016291847,0.0002209006,0.00001511225,0.0032420221,0.9838483,0.000102872335,0.00031808048,0.0011343461,0.0092209475,0.000045186433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017725503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025983835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02815147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033383856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040672203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14888096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3179536112","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107262","title":"Research abuses against people of colour and other vulnerable groups in early psychedelic research","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Psychedelics and Drug Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Canada Research Chairs; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Mental health; Psychology; Agency (philosophy); Psychiatry; Covert; Informed consent; Ethnic group; Empirical research; Vulnerability (computing); Population; Criminology; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Sociology; Social science; Political science; Law; Environmental health","score_opus":0.31467285852682225,"score_gpt":0.5539317616227303,"score_spread":0.23925890309590803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3179536112","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7659126,0.0327934,0.018273667,0.112607926,0.0018122769,0.0011254727,0.00012598194,0.00007438076,0.06727424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94749004,0.008449936,0.008314098,0.031471997,0.00045170065,0.0006191717,0.000022459486,0.000049686285,0.0031308313],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.7599357,0.21429995,0.006594732,0.003136062,0.012566938,0.0034666792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6580459,0.25240758,0.03987082,0.026662346,0.014093912,0.008919451],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1956075,0.00039744264,0.001115926,0.0039363327,0.011991171,0.008046471,0.0014446004,0.0026114986,0.0037325376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16837236,0.0007446368,0.0006945679,0.0027211795,0.029392203,0.009112969,0.010612753,0.004468414,0.00055539573],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002749787,0.00015365343,0.050831396,0.002298093,0.00011159522,0.0028921023,0.7897184,0.000041972908,0.004112322,0.07089085,0.0049309735,0.07374363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009243348,0.0008146874,0.07821362,0.013268519,0.00018467531,0.011072628,0.6434757,0.00026739363,0.0038939542,0.053395502,0.1950923,0.00022853105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002628772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072109415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9973885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034302804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010534423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99195915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3180783106","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107291","title":"Reflections of methodological and ethical challenges in conducting research during COVID-19 involving resettled refugee youth in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Migration, Health and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Impact; Western University; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Rigour; Reflexivity; Dignity; Distancing; Refugee; Research ethics; Pandemic; Negotiation; Sociology; Qualitative research; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Engineering ethics; Political science; Public relations; Criminology; Law; Social science; Medicine; Epistemology","score_opus":0.7900588271469575,"score_gpt":0.6224715585187514,"score_spread":0.16758726862820617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3180783106","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46008283,0.007378587,0.012629258,0.48453942,0.0030396017,0.0023423699,0.00020281081,0.00009276413,0.02969235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9284199,0.005338317,0.014311359,0.04264843,0.000349968,0.0016050033,0.000040598894,0.00012275329,0.0071637705],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.756464,0.19604029,0.005348843,0.004036425,0.019079456,0.019030852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74360037,0.18692726,0.008842185,0.005043274,0.032609105,0.022977803],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16848412,0.0009468258,0.0013596319,0.0020935514,0.06650463,0.02581319,0.0070992215,0.008014583,0.0021114633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1760271,0.0016642761,0.0011449973,0.0038912077,0.053558078,0.005151022,0.013974799,0.023041267,0.00036287066],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005526869,0.000039097748,0.0017554233,0.00026754133,0.00001465331,0.0020772826,0.9772421,0.0001578071,0.0004601828,0.0067754737,0.004225294,0.0069299177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010967719,0.000033878743,0.0012498873,0.0007710399,0.000013449251,0.00031538,0.972281,0.00017288106,0.00035393194,0.0015868196,0.023163289,0.00004750173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82304937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9048666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8315159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15256993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28147888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9828988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3180878292","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107443","title":"Why we should not ‘just use age’ for COVID-19 vaccine prioritisation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"World Health Organization","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Population; Medicine; Demography; Vaccination; Gerontology; Environmental health; Virology; Sociology; Disease; Pathology; Outbreak","score_opus":0.26923908228846893,"score_gpt":0.46768036185104433,"score_spread":0.1984412795625754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3180878292","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004476718,0.0016522658,0.0023839255,0.98310834,0.0021153733,0.000022257127,0.000007237473,0.000019163765,0.0062146294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19887917,0.0018300177,0.0058739963,0.78630173,0.0035726242,0.0001199033,0.00001055537,0.00006949829,0.0033424972],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8814241,0.091414765,0.0045045423,0.003673537,0.014409951,0.004573055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83452594,0.11850015,0.012734286,0.005648413,0.01729767,0.011293568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.096937865,0.0005596709,0.00090886065,0.000875127,0.0054289103,0.008358667,0.0022438818,0.021860009,0.0029561764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22994795,0.00072272547,0.0008628902,0.00059340807,0.034405008,0.010779766,0.005806396,0.03294019,0.0017096113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022357122,0.00024825853,0.0072318627,0.0006339448,0.00017896693,0.00089256075,0.039909396,0.00067417795,0.0013976727,0.58998305,0.28506854,0.07355798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028627008,0.0002784179,0.0036625573,0.0029507966,0.00010105809,0.001563033,0.01946042,0.0013527381,0.001733886,0.46726474,0.50111336,0.00023281705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041453578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00379111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096937865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005087183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012834214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51266253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184842396","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107529","title":"Defining the undefinable: the black box problem in healthcare artificial intelligence","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":209,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Black box; Health care; Point (geometry); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Data science; Law; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.2417210488442233,"score_gpt":0.4876561588576734,"score_spread":0.2459351100134501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184842396","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014564604,0.029643416,0.32740363,0.54887736,0.002536399,0.00016760394,0.00007343788,0.000084493186,0.07664911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77521825,0.017808596,0.1200412,0.07622383,0.003252525,0.0007896146,0.00008575,0.00016254825,0.0064177443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9438135,0.04478527,0.0019582065,0.0021167218,0.0058020633,0.0015241704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9315038,0.057098,0.0028466994,0.0032211004,0.0039387653,0.0013916614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.059814177,0.00074680534,0.0016266993,0.0030779291,0.005828884,0.013337185,0.0032999655,0.012259213,0.002501454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057780672,0.0007293984,0.0010485107,0.0023782572,0.0800225,0.023290092,0.010191372,0.01894542,0.0005618966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007353358,0.0000057938096,0.00008947842,0.00005384854,0.0000036571566,0.000048836362,0.0020201507,0.00015528056,0.000025117286,0.9920089,0.0012499581,0.004331588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009593923,0.0000116525935,0.00008379592,0.0002735935,0.0000040551226,0.00008911085,0.0012710872,0.00042141645,0.00006065061,0.98311144,0.01465178,0.000011965775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023332327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014658769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059814177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066424785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010712985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31633133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191714851","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107493","title":"Social determinants of health and slippery slopes in assisted dying debates: lessons from Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Jurisdiction; Legislation; Law; Slippery slope; Assisted suicide; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.32720714935224054,"score_gpt":0.5204253375996943,"score_spread":0.1932181882474538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191714851","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14792563,0.03838173,0.0012328462,0.65289015,0.001237524,0.00010489871,0.0006545996,0.000033199696,0.15753944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88731164,0.021479862,0.0013608336,0.071662374,0.00029577696,0.000060795533,0.00019332465,0.000060553255,0.017574875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911272,0.0021952456,0.00022234739,0.00054678594,0.0021818378,0.0037266216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9731041,0.011754946,0.00080012105,0.0004910899,0.008103819,0.0057458985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008685128,0.00039819142,0.0008709851,0.0018170911,0.036615483,0.013365575,0.0033533417,0.005761336,0.0049202875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019537695,0.00034907367,0.00086395803,0.004416709,0.02183868,0.0035395354,0.0067361565,0.009870502,0.00021840233],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016215339,0.00013361113,0.02059946,0.00080075744,0.000111655754,0.0025366824,0.16837353,0.0020732745,0.00043145873,0.60174924,0.13654064,0.06648755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014191089,0.00006091683,0.050861724,0.003699267,0.00022494918,0.0003958345,0.28391403,0.0016801825,0.00056302367,0.074207656,0.58387995,0.0003705366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9982697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32398912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.32398912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.44796562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7840768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192943571","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107263","title":"Non-static framework for understanding adaptive designs: an ethical justification in paediatric trials","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical studies and practices","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"George & Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation; Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba; University of Manitoba","funders":"Research Manitoba","keywords":"Scrutiny; Clinical trial; Psychological intervention; Value (mathematics); Comprehension; Medicine; Clinical study design; Appeal; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Psychiatry; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.6460258876031516,"score_gpt":0.5694513930080444,"score_spread":0.07657449459510723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3192943571","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00798288,0.013108109,0.6931171,0.1827946,0.0021467267,0.001392436,0.00019224774,0.00015323803,0.0991127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46236914,0.0061447164,0.46787888,0.04788732,0.0026932333,0.0061782743,0.000112668975,0.00019744973,0.0065383217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.64954233,0.31343886,0.011395625,0.008412846,0.014966508,0.0022438567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4752393,0.4788357,0.016254883,0.015066464,0.012509592,0.0020939778],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.25497687,0.0016282472,0.0015364776,0.0038544445,0.0055242144,0.017414518,0.005378251,0.019195348,0.00497271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2898513,0.0013292687,0.002111784,0.0025664798,0.088225946,0.02083655,0.008156808,0.017030671,0.0010852593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000078477415,0.000006096458,0.00011749624,0.00015027222,0.000008950341,0.00006623878,0.0036228492,0.00032376163,0.000030868505,0.992332,0.0006412961,0.002692214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002936831,0.00002933847,0.00009734696,0.00069651427,0.0000138935675,0.0001392051,0.0010687951,0.0011539436,0.00009504387,0.9692225,0.027433729,0.000020299309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030262317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002078453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74502313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012230434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014290415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9187462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194865074","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107647","title":"Flawed reasoning on two dilemmas: a commentary on Baron and Dierckxsens (2021)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Argument (complex analysis); Psychological intervention; Psychology; Informed consent; Epistemology; Psychotherapist; Psychoanalysis; Psychiatry; Medicine; Law; Philosophy; Alternative medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.07038857590960447,"score_gpt":0.41998926841437717,"score_spread":0.3496006925047727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194865074","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006762646,0.0010295131,0.000038119564,0.9903971,0.008084835,0.0000025400868,0.000007861369,0.0000051371194,0.0003672773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009208801,0.00034940118,0.00009549118,0.9897361,0.008252945,0.000015705602,0.0000032567366,0.000011141083,0.0006151969],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96743137,0.01586932,0.0028052772,0.0037631074,0.007865254,0.0022656068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8669607,0.10588187,0.004134182,0.001727825,0.01305576,0.008239637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03656426,0.0013269382,0.0028744407,0.0019726013,0.011772726,0.011403912,0.007304129,0.1197181,0.0051126205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15468486,0.0016275481,0.0022270023,0.0021938935,0.020465862,0.016024379,0.006022357,0.12514564,0.0041699316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032186177,0.000015906,0.00010730701,0.00009151665,0.0000094526895,0.0005412539,0.0012877088,0.000038619546,0.000053892247,0.010370567,0.9836225,0.0038290694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090754984,0.000036153448,0.00041593105,0.0015929865,0.000027686046,0.0013380613,0.003343989,0.00028580008,0.00017264203,0.03421496,0.95835185,0.0001292043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015186224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01960057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1197181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012132897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020177605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1933726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195556311","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107793","title":"MAID’s slippery slope: a commentary on Downie and Schuklenk","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Slippery slope; Legislation; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Legislature; Right to die; Political science; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.2108061032770161,"score_gpt":0.4658342760595069,"score_spread":0.2550281727824908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195556311","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038150506,0.004493261,0.000031530137,0.9833349,0.008848456,0.000009518883,0.000026539341,0.0000055996748,0.002868635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005017701,0.0018306623,0.000062654784,0.9846432,0.0050102393,0.000022309592,0.0000073154906,0.000018679815,0.0033872894],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825811,0.0062334863,0.00094792957,0.0020829018,0.005004314,0.0031503502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96049756,0.02718028,0.00084933365,0.00038327507,0.0071091964,0.0039803293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013464621,0.0010034929,0.0018173013,0.0018245564,0.02401559,0.00909514,0.0066756695,0.058607202,0.0036321536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05271892,0.0012155882,0.001355456,0.002524464,0.018628154,0.0065408694,0.0034519779,0.07100255,0.0015267688],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019032093,0.0000064775677,0.00011024395,0.00007543429,0.0000056046592,0.00047031898,0.0024975238,0.000031326083,0.000050900577,0.008376765,0.98591053,0.0024457653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044108772,0.000018816905,0.0009167576,0.0013049569,0.000028373825,0.00048631316,0.008472039,0.00015365903,0.00018601328,0.0068023247,0.9814626,0.00012400105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6044969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7466327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6044969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054790568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.073389634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7956646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196906615","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-107147","title":"Strategic and principled approach to the ethical challenges of epilepsy monitoring unit triage","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Epilepsy research and treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"NeuroDevNet; University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia; Canada Research Chairs; National Institute of Mental Health; American Academy of Neurology","keywords":"Triage; Epilepsy; Computer science; Resource (disambiguation); Consolidation (business); Risk analysis (engineering); Component (thermodynamics); Business; Medicine; Process management; Medical emergency; Psychiatry; Accounting","score_opus":0.2514419465138798,"score_gpt":0.4400906397486024,"score_spread":0.1886486932347226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196906615","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029764187,0.0023106893,0.42493907,0.35155594,0.0016068153,0.0010389955,0.000055709756,0.00012750535,0.18860114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77226084,0.0013859941,0.17857409,0.034027416,0.0008131518,0.0014270708,0.00004757456,0.00007719462,0.011386653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92718816,0.055679064,0.0025782797,0.0028447297,0.008670986,0.0030386206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96857935,0.019920861,0.0023491152,0.0025411358,0.0041538146,0.0024557083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.057951048,0.0006320089,0.0005390432,0.0015036738,0.009128328,0.013829512,0.0024569281,0.010061331,0.0021470033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043598544,0.00055749336,0.00096570386,0.0011854125,0.04977787,0.007984225,0.012122859,0.0117901815,0.0007797962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008102765,0.000029954665,0.00045081822,0.00005221756,0.0000071426703,0.00024578866,0.007823194,0.00076247717,0.00017673921,0.9807598,0.002962348,0.0067214877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028905508,0.00005729533,0.0004087021,0.00033127452,0.000011073002,0.0007394441,0.006394091,0.002926567,0.00031915042,0.9166358,0.072097115,0.00005072141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031242128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046223253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057951048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0102467695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035950284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30647808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198108503","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107794","title":"Eligibility for assisted dying: not protection for vulnerable people, but protection for people when they are vulnerable","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Medicine; Psychology; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.29979281761812604,"score_gpt":0.4590982115531855,"score_spread":0.15930539393505944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198108503","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010577638,0.0012816414,0.000104522165,0.9881231,0.0021934542,0.000006780271,0.000013706154,0.000004936484,0.007214093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015227008,0.00080971775,0.00018342095,0.9739075,0.0024128826,0.00001534504,0.000009327311,0.00001078255,0.007423999],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.989365,0.0026477543,0.00054232596,0.0008567429,0.0037487878,0.0028394868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796047,0.011468761,0.00084746064,0.00048400453,0.0039654146,0.0036296444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008247741,0.00043939974,0.00087424903,0.0005244111,0.017187176,0.0061203525,0.0026569802,0.044880062,0.004291852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03204646,0.0004962644,0.00073813694,0.0007495375,0.0169077,0.005579719,0.003865954,0.044118106,0.0016575712],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043866814,0.00002978388,0.0012893205,0.00014584155,0.000011842871,0.0024815889,0.01013958,0.000113741604,0.0005210235,0.0852248,0.88304913,0.016949452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040150197,0.0000356191,0.0022417305,0.00068172195,0.00001464068,0.0017019707,0.008602327,0.00027058707,0.0002648526,0.033913907,0.95213926,0.000093257586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45309567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6603355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45309567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02868899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06285695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9009167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199677529","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107795","title":"Eligibility and access to voluntary assisted dying: a view from Victoria, Australia","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Data science; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.42274022787231547,"score_gpt":0.5477861803000733,"score_spread":0.12504595242775784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199677529","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014589506,0.014594015,0.00023445368,0.95677,0.0024396966,0.000016441494,0.000019824722,0.000005050588,0.011331084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18602823,0.00892998,0.0005404625,0.7872204,0.0015953674,0.000046628895,0.00001441012,0.00003241578,0.015592073],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98638576,0.0072528184,0.00056001067,0.00070679764,0.0027074458,0.0023871446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98515236,0.006964333,0.00081772794,0.00022332105,0.0028423052,0.003999957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012171644,0.00030473183,0.0007074505,0.00077331817,0.022169514,0.0061234664,0.0024697739,0.015252775,0.0016721865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022183908,0.000648406,0.0006841153,0.0011384544,0.013533327,0.0051308386,0.006919368,0.029610042,0.00030549947],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000121821395,0.00006478202,0.0026283015,0.00085290865,0.000039774146,0.005706894,0.29298896,0.00031036534,0.0011392349,0.18134968,0.47170404,0.043093268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036837046,0.0000804177,0.0068881665,0.0027727166,0.0000321122,0.002841964,0.0804113,0.00053958,0.000337193,0.03987551,0.86595535,0.00022897973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71074307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71074307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047122154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08311177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58192086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200822225","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107837","title":"Taking the long view on slippery slope objections","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Slippery slope; Worry; Argument (complex analysis); Social psychology; Law; Health care; Psychology; Law and economics; Sociology; Medicine; Psychiatry; Political science","score_opus":0.14245881364366764,"score_gpt":0.44639347213504316,"score_spread":0.3039346584913755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200822225","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005511038,0.0015879578,0.000638779,0.9809683,0.0069282963,0.000010280139,0.000026057796,0.000028384398,0.009260812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013654576,0.00070310023,0.00062944164,0.9725653,0.0051070354,0.000026486836,0.000016170294,0.00007052138,0.0072274595],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92305076,0.017853525,0.0032209905,0.008562612,0.0417964,0.005515686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8819101,0.07265766,0.004278301,0.0053328318,0.027423838,0.008397169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.053873736,0.001065569,0.0017728547,0.0019356443,0.0200356,0.02007464,0.007297847,0.06605678,0.008539113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13488218,0.0010756407,0.001585528,0.0018244201,0.07530766,0.015886132,0.008658757,0.11979117,0.0033302356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003144996,0.00002417532,0.00039130627,0.000059227878,0.000024893989,0.0002034137,0.0037893625,0.000116708106,0.00013648438,0.27055037,0.715062,0.009610508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004705291,0.000029424997,0.00048328887,0.00081040617,0.000028812006,0.0001559105,0.0029872204,0.00038965754,0.00036397486,0.09599167,0.8985248,0.00018775753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28689516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26604012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28689516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03616246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049533337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5704505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204408447","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107720","title":"Heritable human genome editing is ‘currently not permitted’, but it is no longer ‘prohibited’: so says the ISSCR","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"CRISPR and Genetic Engineering","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Law; Research ethics; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.03088127317579206,"score_gpt":0.37243364614603036,"score_spread":0.3415523729702383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204408447","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001250079,0.0052387654,0.0047547645,0.889992,0.03819176,0.00002895714,0.00026706822,0.0003770668,0.059899572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01526403,0.0034390362,0.004820103,0.89642805,0.006161693,0.00009373828,0.0003493296,0.00030400007,0.07314],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98231745,0.0032356954,0.0017312164,0.0026411053,0.0087323915,0.0013422018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9632011,0.022157885,0.0019732055,0.0033391973,0.006749775,0.002578809],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015784975,0.00054803665,0.0008245242,0.0004570026,0.0034856396,0.006759688,0.0018624284,0.017505677,0.009919817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039288085,0.00056072173,0.0013145643,0.0006220713,0.012333399,0.0058467058,0.0033284414,0.025013657,0.007220933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003271231,0.000033902525,0.00040824714,0.00017940608,0.00001249559,0.00014686948,0.001188849,0.000060331873,0.0011048426,0.11513668,0.8512567,0.030438952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009381136,0.000019500141,0.00036712538,0.0001512803,0.000010461979,0.00018103223,0.00023717733,0.000037439397,0.0008586165,0.013320116,0.9847793,0.000028604749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012413224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019708084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9824943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026063293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012787154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08347994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213974828","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107765","title":"Informed consent in pragmatic trials: results from a survey of trials published 2014–2019","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"National Institute on Aging; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Waiver; Informed consent; Research ethics; Family medicine; Clinical trial; Medicine; Institutional review board; MEDLINE; Logistic regression; Psychology; Alternative medicine; Law; Political science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.7879328139554614,"score_gpt":0.6646176551062494,"score_spread":0.12331515884921207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213974828","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23196737,0.6386439,0.019956907,0.047506385,0.0019606212,0.014073415,0.02615169,0.00043200338,0.019307658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7249164,0.19514695,0.023468263,0.017058363,0.0013833276,0.025419608,0.010563032,0.00061708235,0.0014269045],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.25018683,0.42376372,0.260018,0.011631814,0.052041493,0.002358094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.056878854,0.69727075,0.17701308,0.017714636,0.048461627,0.0026610566],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.50891346,0.000965737,0.003837697,0.017156564,0.0016329443,0.0098326085,0.002475683,0.0036726294,0.005824345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8401085,0.0017804406,0.0055136234,0.030370302,0.004724141,0.0115814125,0.007573689,0.0036133013,0.001579676],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007032047,0.00031775472,0.21198851,0.21463235,0.009457249,0.00037833507,0.030810948,0.0012098284,0.00091952307,0.0068385927,0.04955474,0.46686018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028331024,0.002732063,0.48076496,0.23826614,0.007288381,0.0024304336,0.019811219,0.0018567514,0.0016248508,0.006967315,0.23464136,0.00078354415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034628045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031877342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9963274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007810074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018704928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60559714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206125651","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107958","title":"Reconsenting paediatric research participants for use of identifying data","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Genome Alberta","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Expansive; Informed consent; Research ethics; Legislation; Political science; Law; Public relations; Medicine; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering; Alternative medicine; Social science","score_opus":0.8331691521865323,"score_gpt":0.6298253878632654,"score_spread":0.20334376432326695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206125651","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09906716,0.009397328,0.11590801,0.46469143,0.013416183,0.026661731,0.0014429245,0.0009788049,0.2684364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3962267,0.009794605,0.114761926,0.28183228,0.0038139045,0.03546001,0.0011917378,0.00051973225,0.15639909],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.83564913,0.11689039,0.015001184,0.0066366224,0.017501924,0.0083207125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8337785,0.08839426,0.011733863,0.025188025,0.026373599,0.014531746],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17159638,0.0006225606,0.0012246998,0.0017806005,0.009356818,0.0056442874,0.0051960363,0.01317996,0.013364307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22861858,0.0012001089,0.0017589704,0.0011641119,0.010066029,0.007153094,0.010536555,0.014939946,0.008329229],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005522488,0.00035045503,0.018458836,0.0020171287,0.000073928524,0.020564226,0.27096403,0.00035132008,0.010761616,0.15590058,0.34792322,0.17208233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009373534,0.00029267374,0.006231289,0.0036693078,0.00004419863,0.009012477,0.041922897,0.00068490236,0.00352397,0.02750728,0.9068661,0.00015131198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017260296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031056676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98682004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055520833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07013337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90749925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206985409","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-108099","title":"Prioritisation for therapies based on a disorder’s severity: ethics and practicality","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical studies and practices","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Bulletin of Medical History","funders":"","keywords":"Data science; Psychology; Medicine; Psychiatry; Computer science","score_opus":0.21064164678735747,"score_gpt":0.4891575810156283,"score_spread":0.2785159342282708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206985409","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00049515394,0.000400851,0.0001312004,0.99612147,0.0013108142,0.0000033570905,0.0000039192037,0.0000023325226,0.0015308508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025252583,0.0008624657,0.0014433711,0.9534599,0.015607574,0.00004140398,0.0000074568075,0.000018246363,0.0033069653],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97470707,0.013980553,0.0027581847,0.0017082356,0.0044559017,0.0023899344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87549746,0.09340994,0.0035988344,0.0023988145,0.010480665,0.014614302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02612825,0.00046897048,0.0016650447,0.00084530906,0.01013386,0.0096358955,0.0027070672,0.089907765,0.006254786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09818939,0.0007953793,0.0012310598,0.0009750842,0.011977953,0.008550635,0.0047861394,0.073604606,0.0019015544],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012855874,0.00015011903,0.002692332,0.0001740933,0.000067657886,0.0062037003,0.0029754,0.0002726795,0.00051572203,0.0849436,0.8719103,0.029965742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027271424,0.00011133863,0.0028633461,0.0014037116,0.000059374477,0.00918598,0.0067789233,0.0018947334,0.0004054214,0.23220688,0.74461365,0.0002038865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071347216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018935457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.089907765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00813346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024098638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13818103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210502428","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107820","title":"Youth should decide: the principle of subsidiarity in paediatric transgender healthcare","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; nobody; Decision maker; Health care; Transgender; Identity (music); Public relations; Psychology; Law; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Management science; Business; Computer security; Economics; European union","score_opus":0.21798432269168427,"score_gpt":0.4677768333604237,"score_spread":0.24979251066873942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210502428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08798119,0.006108604,0.1825404,0.22833999,0.0016730314,0.00035776326,0.000075142554,0.000091257374,0.49283272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95131075,0.0009161521,0.021882894,0.016513502,0.00052521075,0.00025736386,0.000015701333,0.00003487066,0.008543461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9779503,0.014828459,0.0010946116,0.001715572,0.002613652,0.0017975415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98351526,0.010457325,0.0014580067,0.0013587913,0.0015162707,0.001694299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024768218,0.00026072306,0.00047932187,0.0007655527,0.005894494,0.00625663,0.0012486842,0.0057486543,0.0027571924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030659769,0.000408976,0.0006753641,0.00038863585,0.048008945,0.007058342,0.008347584,0.0086977985,0.00059681607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008750377,0.000006829074,0.000604185,0.00001702121,0.0000026659873,0.0001912798,0.008265609,0.00011766551,0.00008506547,0.98616356,0.00087447924,0.0036629217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036081547,0.000061930645,0.0011713572,0.00041491858,0.000013301563,0.0011544526,0.006639511,0.0005684661,0.0004360073,0.91274273,0.07672493,0.000036327794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003986829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004994361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024768218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043718903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013145603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13098842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224301868","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2022-108129","title":"Imagination and idealism in the medical sciences of an ageing world","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Birth, Development, and Health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Idealism; Ageing; Disease; Paradigm shift; Population ageing; Medicine; Control (management); Population; Gerontology; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Pathology; Computer science; Internal medicine; Environmental health","score_opus":0.1041411083358924,"score_gpt":0.4432536114118971,"score_spread":0.3391125030760047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224301868","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02991352,0.06793698,0.07202736,0.46294367,0.005807572,0.00010844055,0.00011085366,0.00014218398,0.36100945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86758536,0.02241469,0.033165243,0.049274758,0.007417443,0.00025246688,0.0000842003,0.00013401895,0.019671846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9826841,0.013661313,0.00048501548,0.00083616236,0.0017488513,0.00058458745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797671,0.014272631,0.0014125162,0.0014057439,0.0014428529,0.0016991749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021894865,0.00061607227,0.0008410392,0.0020204517,0.005733785,0.011747052,0.0010105459,0.0050893943,0.0030151398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018884161,0.00037032182,0.00072183926,0.000884611,0.09313655,0.011633026,0.0066028987,0.009184291,0.0009931958],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013255127,0.00001159996,0.000106363856,0.00006264232,0.00000482536,0.000046286386,0.006555447,0.00011246365,0.00009187764,0.986072,0.003809,0.0031141147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013192524,0.000016372938,0.00013590438,0.00012853381,0.0000029454388,0.0000961085,0.001920043,0.00020448801,0.000072205876,0.9439804,0.053414997,0.000014881821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012076952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086622156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021894865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046147867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00531056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11579245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246900162","doi":"10.1136/jme.2011.044461","title":"Authors' response","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Dental Education, Practice, Research","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Alberta; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Data science","score_opus":0.44774279520021165,"score_gpt":0.6389092338265984,"score_spread":0.19116643862638671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246900162","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00068852113,0.00078248355,0.00024107697,0.87195307,0.11986399,0.00008644819,0.00024212807,0.00020672582,0.005935452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004250239,0.00039292916,0.00039862332,0.9483024,0.022689201,0.00019314908,0.000073168914,0.00009240214,0.023607934],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9771089,0.004865065,0.003118863,0.0023155892,0.009207076,0.003384461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88794386,0.044934772,0.008394265,0.0049202153,0.046107452,0.007699338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012552371,0.0009945907,0.0022841939,0.0017087205,0.0051650107,0.0076834075,0.0041423785,0.059344016,0.05253792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16123684,0.0012607811,0.002465519,0.00092416664,0.004108805,0.0031895936,0.005718205,0.03926116,0.028420465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004544396,0.0000129338405,0.00030560434,0.00015825222,0.000022466462,0.0004431146,0.00041185375,0.000041184958,0.00017530462,0.0014293102,0.99359244,0.0033621753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005163835,0.000028991557,0.000568072,0.00052224955,0.000039070484,0.0005854269,0.0013410886,0.00015493065,0.0003886996,0.0014901182,0.99477565,0.000054086755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003712794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042032576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059344016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007646174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01188605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17575687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249253313","doi":"10.1136/jme.2010.040147","title":"Respecting frailty: Table 1","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Sciences Centre; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Psychology; Medicine; Gerontology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.29525347799540397,"score_gpt":0.534558246062917,"score_spread":0.23930476806751305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249253313","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020496113,0.0077159735,0.009588916,0.085923165,0.0034255262,0.000981289,0.0010516876,0.00027070893,0.8705467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.348609,0.033082724,0.06409284,0.09412157,0.0037777077,0.002314504,0.0020219167,0.00022280827,0.4517569],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984072,0.00059552287,0.000108881184,0.00006209273,0.00052079826,0.0003055347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975237,0.00053284044,0.00019083069,0.00009188232,0.00068552676,0.0009751908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015741205,0.00032681413,0.000275118,0.0005857914,0.0023374679,0.0021294584,0.00073001656,0.0020544562,0.026699046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041426104,0.000120509816,0.00042523225,0.0005568046,0.0010600757,0.0010718548,0.0018257562,0.0021107541,0.004527248],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006177891,0.00020855904,0.010380715,0.0006406216,0.000026287433,0.0015561916,0.0045549925,0.00044027134,0.0010640812,0.11218983,0.5238891,0.34498757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027304894,0.00014158807,0.011634883,0.0011243662,0.000022004595,0.0031902173,0.002971414,0.00018589207,0.0006303731,0.030480621,0.9495599,0.00003141252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031257116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013649521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026699046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013315629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006981502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0893172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253763944","doi":"10.1136/jme.2003.007609","title":"Unheard heroes","year":2004,"lang":"ja","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; BC Innovation Council; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Disease; Etiology; Scleroderma (fungus); Referral; Dermatology; Pediatrics; Internal medicine; Pathology; Family medicine","score_opus":0.07405481425577766,"score_gpt":0.3681435430845318,"score_spread":0.29408872882875414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253763944","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00231611,0.04538819,0.0020442912,0.4963772,0.23983438,0.000088293295,0.001453665,0.001073775,0.21142417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017072683,0.02463277,0.0015028634,0.23923208,0.051257145,0.00009453794,0.0009683622,0.001043474,0.6641961],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966633,0.000951522,0.00014290515,0.00058580324,0.0011419114,0.000514605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99184966,0.0015194797,0.00040896455,0.00095554447,0.0029881718,0.002278121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029333364,0.0012802333,0.0010016169,0.0011936892,0.003409281,0.007211389,0.001652793,0.0050084256,0.2381118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016325885,0.0003624427,0.00082602777,0.00088888966,0.0026057467,0.008356466,0.0046520573,0.010298882,0.12834483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004157764,0.00002176989,0.00017092426,0.00007966224,0.000006885437,0.00012692048,0.00016391698,0.000026591397,0.00009187301,0.0057628658,0.9644541,0.02905275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003991259,0.000010265305,0.0001146496,0.000142478,0.0000025991392,0.00016445883,0.00025787676,0.000018375642,0.000048988117,0.0016376292,0.9975924,0.0000063517064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025534106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035469483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2381118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016296501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031034744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7965633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281628194","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2022-108400","title":"Orphans cannot be after-birth aborted: a response to Bobier","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Analogy; Aborted Fetus; Value (mathematics); Fetus; Psychology; Pregnancy; Medicine; Obstetrics; Philosophy; Biology; Epistemology; Mathematics; Genetics; Statistics","score_opus":0.06723787333256065,"score_gpt":0.4256822397972119,"score_spread":0.3584443664646513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281628194","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005686873,0.0006239348,0.000050966682,0.9941995,0.002973864,0.0000058596056,0.000013667301,0.0000079506935,0.0015555216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003207003,0.00037066176,0.00009200163,0.98930293,0.0030680625,0.000018417742,0.000004791267,0.000014166236,0.0039220164],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960594,0.001471899,0.00033527237,0.00053678174,0.00078319083,0.00081337895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989881,0.0066241873,0.00054298155,0.00020362974,0.0012161821,0.0015320656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007916622,0.0006829675,0.0013950943,0.0004782562,0.009903401,0.0039601573,0.0026875457,0.06620322,0.0042969678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028065896,0.0010965462,0.00094475446,0.00066004193,0.0042652483,0.0054363096,0.0026585069,0.07009553,0.002450235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000796094,0.000041154868,0.00097421376,0.000065587534,0.00001774289,0.0029024149,0.002365286,0.00008293161,0.0003374044,0.014162579,0.9727299,0.006241158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009842193,0.00010818754,0.0025196518,0.0006166816,0.000046040343,0.0027035037,0.0065067317,0.00054030865,0.00046070805,0.01412095,0.97215015,0.00012859037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03704192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06257166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06620322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005745742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009885771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073652625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282978969","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2022-108163","title":"Repairing moral injury takes a team: what clinicians can learn from combat veterans","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Columbia College","funders":"McDonald Agape Foundation","keywords":"Moral injury; Psychology; Computer security; Computer science; Medicine; Medical emergency; Engineering ethics; Data science; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.22460414437142773,"score_gpt":0.48779243620296214,"score_spread":0.2631882918315344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4282978969","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10346035,0.09398334,0.0020073769,0.7725991,0.012004916,0.00018622023,0.000069505826,0.000068992034,0.0156202745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50698406,0.14821132,0.005427612,0.31355402,0.018059291,0.00036005772,0.00016507202,0.00013501648,0.0071036182],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99422616,0.0034156628,0.000308789,0.00039697345,0.0005989309,0.001053641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840406,0.005504659,0.0014171472,0.0005377355,0.0027305733,0.0057692174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008427131,0.00085869443,0.001674024,0.0010716196,0.0075180093,0.009444173,0.0027251525,0.009891388,0.0037887767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03469404,0.0007800511,0.00073100196,0.0012140145,0.0080033615,0.01648693,0.007878854,0.018821044,0.0015394452],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021349639,0.0016948233,0.019276183,0.0048317597,0.0001029132,0.025105825,0.50010365,0.00027704352,0.0010875611,0.010129527,0.19666964,0.2405075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010584253,0.0008069298,0.008952118,0.009047227,0.000081245744,0.023928426,0.7032368,0.0002342654,0.00041122347,0.023147928,0.22981435,0.00023367412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004745898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021770725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009891388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004358952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00949201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044567466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283158046","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2022-108204","title":"Parent-initiated posthumous-assisted reproduction revisited in light of the interest in genetic origins","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Bioethics; Identity (music); Sperm donation; Anonymity; Genealogy; Certainty; Donation; Reproduction; Sociology; Epistemology; Biology; Law; Genetics; History; Philosophy; Political science; Sperm; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.17721480299869993,"score_gpt":0.4097008340618875,"score_spread":0.23248603106318758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283158046","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.080515884,0.06970929,0.02908512,0.6134908,0.0032290034,0.00005325882,0.000046940942,0.000034791185,0.20383485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90731865,0.01645908,0.004009732,0.060292576,0.002900599,0.00008602468,0.00001212308,0.000029819432,0.008891467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99311596,0.0047439286,0.00014070884,0.000678432,0.000754805,0.0005660452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98789203,0.010485185,0.00057288347,0.00036475045,0.00038707862,0.0002980448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011615736,0.00022845244,0.00042848487,0.000474614,0.003626696,0.00464065,0.0016492341,0.012005942,0.0018704286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010184727,0.00023374683,0.0005813196,0.00047059197,0.026180489,0.005349661,0.004262695,0.0141638275,0.00024301752],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012511872,0.000012134651,0.00020870392,0.000050363833,0.000003947239,0.001411991,0.009286315,0.00009420408,0.00013211736,0.98233676,0.0014121662,0.005038702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032601674,0.00013209737,0.0015787395,0.0010495096,0.000039836978,0.0061665983,0.011714822,0.0011089244,0.00096094597,0.7505123,0.22665922,0.000044430384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001728551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029779293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012005942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038575248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00394859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061430633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283206599","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107953","title":"Ethics of non-therapeutic research on imminently dying patients in the intensive care unit","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Research ethics; Relation (database); Scope (computer science); Medicine; Informed consent; Psychology; Alternative medicine; Computer science; Engineering; Pathology","score_opus":0.48789970388256687,"score_gpt":0.5770706643961843,"score_spread":0.08917096051361739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283206599","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12234346,0.012662465,0.13999437,0.56519717,0.008310264,0.023228904,0.00036304852,0.00021684822,0.12768352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71282613,0.009824671,0.14042878,0.08856813,0.005185267,0.028284386,0.00023115569,0.00010311092,0.014548308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.48417172,0.47420993,0.014809995,0.0063820947,0.014901825,0.0055245277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.57356405,0.32933927,0.018431429,0.040402867,0.015439443,0.022822982],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2992421,0.0006635835,0.002397554,0.0012818151,0.009390794,0.011948121,0.005043394,0.016224533,0.0031568184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2949761,0.0013693874,0.0013996243,0.0013796377,0.036795586,0.006250475,0.008886188,0.017967967,0.002013447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013752909,0.0010013775,0.006206589,0.0016789999,0.00015039087,0.0035956213,0.14658843,0.0021540967,0.0024070113,0.6922017,0.050727453,0.09191309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088360487,0.0022322896,0.0067997994,0.009511924,0.000117743664,0.0050821425,0.062112987,0.0048554214,0.0035946658,0.46697256,0.43740052,0.00043636575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017402928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002463477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2992421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00507545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04421765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8641592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292385245","doi":"10.1136/jme-2021-108087","title":"Prescribing safe supply: ethical considerations for clinicians","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Opioid Use Disorder Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Health Services; The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Seriousness; Harm reduction; Harm; Medicine; Pandemic; Business; Medical emergency; Internet privacy; Intensive care medicine; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Psychiatry; Public relations; Risk analysis (engineering); Nursing; Public health; Psychology; Political science; Law; Social psychology; Pathology","score_opus":0.11615158781933976,"score_gpt":0.42621787391173827,"score_spread":0.3100662860923985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292385245","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002957497,0.0028849805,0.0033837932,0.98046654,0.0019749918,0.00004545668,0.0000061551377,0.000019529338,0.008261049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13615894,0.0051775407,0.011639972,0.83276206,0.00743466,0.00031697823,0.000015946025,0.000059896814,0.0064339843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.85810703,0.105745405,0.0072992416,0.004477084,0.01738371,0.0069875396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7038912,0.20631287,0.013813737,0.012102157,0.029499723,0.034380343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09830717,0.0006559204,0.0016384341,0.001034443,0.015065749,0.018252324,0.003398303,0.041204784,0.004758469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23750488,0.0010981681,0.0009422563,0.0011317482,0.036729142,0.016890397,0.0094926115,0.047913294,0.0027497015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016174473,0.00048697798,0.004858994,0.00064450235,0.00007961058,0.00789602,0.091934174,0.00076468766,0.0011794952,0.4283907,0.39149475,0.07210837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013575693,0.00017224214,0.00096201245,0.0035834503,0.000034483302,0.0076140147,0.05668133,0.0012685885,0.00056117197,0.43614304,0.4926653,0.00017856456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002651402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041481974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09830717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052640424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033531167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51990426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298006300","doi":"10.1136/jme-2022-108431","title":"Externalist argument against medical assistance in dying for psychiatric illness","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Externalism; Mental illness; Psychiatry; Argument (complex analysis); Judgement; Psychological intervention; Psychology; Medicine; Mental health; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06942031819920254,"score_gpt":0.3713471220779052,"score_spread":0.3019268038787027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298006300","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023565875,0.0020393357,0.016418405,0.6768379,0.0023625256,0.00006872788,0.000032869215,0.00003593164,0.27863842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7860962,0.0008160969,0.004310015,0.18760328,0.0037677903,0.00017278593,0.000015033986,0.000055713273,0.017162943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9806698,0.013506525,0.00052216207,0.001212274,0.002728777,0.0013603873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816056,0.013401348,0.0013445051,0.00095987716,0.001691214,0.000997372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016963055,0.00031955223,0.00048385042,0.000782775,0.0070579886,0.0068911356,0.0016726053,0.015359132,0.0024000886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028632428,0.00024351409,0.00068985415,0.00041179018,0.052810445,0.0048189024,0.01009316,0.016831186,0.00055770465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016776727,0.000012036173,0.0002019949,0.000026237272,0.000005983238,0.00019188452,0.0028785754,0.00013552439,0.000059831727,0.98667693,0.008240396,0.0015538984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008390108,0.00003146936,0.0005051055,0.0003948452,0.000021246395,0.00060829666,0.0032765316,0.0010871481,0.00031473304,0.847306,0.14633855,0.000032152002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018889325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023573528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016963055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045331353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004654975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.089710236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311625308","doi":"10.1136/jme-2022-108449","title":"COVID-19 vaccine boosters for young adults: a risk benefit assessment and ethical analysis of mandate policies at universities","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Reactogenicity; Mandate; Harm; Medicine; Booster (rocketry); Public health; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Family medicine; Environmental health; Political science; Psychology; Immunization; Social psychology; Nursing; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Immunology; Disease; Law","score_opus":0.05456950120960275,"score_gpt":0.43690055332736044,"score_spread":0.3823310521177577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311625308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8017973,0.0074700722,0.09637738,0.04233504,0.00022332354,0.004922815,0.0014344885,0.00009288776,0.04534679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752201,0.0011734539,0.0188773,0.0021040586,0.00012129379,0.0012173769,0.00020896237,0.000017412909,0.0010600893],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.79269177,0.17886697,0.004119957,0.0025805784,0.017591355,0.0041494085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.48516503,0.4494403,0.03273919,0.006530847,0.023691505,0.002433108],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.21092808,0.00080797425,0.001026702,0.004223919,0.0014176031,0.0044551105,0.001275469,0.0025643604,0.0027080174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37870577,0.00078842364,0.0035723553,0.002273876,0.0031190743,0.0041282517,0.0041412595,0.004010623,0.00025759498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024942358,0.0013465914,0.46684828,0.0015345131,0.0024607226,0.00083846034,0.005961461,0.06944486,0.0005434327,0.22543147,0.011040222,0.2120559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070608524,0.0044616894,0.3000097,0.0049966504,0.0028872814,0.001071681,0.010803511,0.4427324,0.0023866312,0.20318928,0.026300922,0.00045429272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074148066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007266302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21092808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0108021265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013370172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97306615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311888120","doi":"10.1136/jme-2022-108369","title":"Ethical uncertainty and COVID-19: exploring the lived experiences of senior physicians at a major medical centre","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Disaster Response and Management","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Moral obligation; Moral dilemma; Action (physics); Pandemic; Psychological intervention; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Health care; Obligation; Qualitative research; Public relations; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Nursing; Medical education; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.1721504764814218,"score_gpt":0.4732912562840003,"score_spread":0.30114077980257853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311888120","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9867019,0.001004606,0.0014750257,0.0069727898,0.00015762365,0.00004288766,0.000031309606,0.000012507771,0.0036013674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963264,0.0005852183,0.00055789464,0.0012708144,0.000054557422,0.00002497797,0.000013083247,0.000011772076,0.0011554572],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98078924,0.01468708,0.00045743943,0.0006528095,0.0011890846,0.0022243762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.969935,0.017752936,0.003224708,0.0005558228,0.0018277309,0.00670386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013704887,0.000754921,0.0008596601,0.0012925977,0.014901869,0.008156716,0.0021443123,0.003652313,0.0021382652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031211324,0.00074328267,0.0004294829,0.0010073262,0.021344002,0.005706789,0.011991731,0.006319737,0.00031287523],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001745807,0.000014512529,0.0013034163,0.000043306623,0.0000034922402,0.0007155468,0.99539965,0.000025153002,0.00022939438,0.0007299773,0.00040663744,0.0011115206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015823459,0.0000322242,0.00034461851,0.000049883452,0.0000015342371,0.00034068062,0.9954933,0.000031414507,0.000063554864,0.00023053582,0.0034011852,0.000009435441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062081516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012904002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014901869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049482323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061725304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07247919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313289426","doi":"10.1136/jme-2022-108447","title":"Evidence, ethics and the promise of artificial intelligence in psychiatry","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; Hospital for Sick Children; University of Toronto","funders":"Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute; Associated Medical Services","keywords":"Humility; Unintended consequences; Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Big data; Applications of artificial intelligence; Data science; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.3882338438514403,"score_gpt":0.5242184120601984,"score_spread":0.1359845682087581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313289426","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008784632,0.030589959,0.01976439,0.89627355,0.001814469,0.000048058955,0.00004996978,0.000028250195,0.04264677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7882654,0.021752661,0.017005539,0.16336028,0.0059790406,0.0002644429,0.00006890088,0.000050240695,0.0032534543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8963067,0.08512529,0.0033444667,0.0026931567,0.010389399,0.0021410396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7150945,0.24705432,0.011198632,0.010643723,0.010502539,0.0055062207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.103212446,0.00059965986,0.0012493321,0.003488707,0.0063658166,0.016211705,0.0024351983,0.015707726,0.0033843764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18667966,0.0005991585,0.00083802093,0.0017351782,0.08293598,0.020771245,0.01175784,0.01727405,0.000637642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047647307,0.000031199066,0.0011758666,0.00030394385,0.000042589316,0.00031002137,0.004126578,0.00044653125,0.00007114997,0.96732605,0.006871133,0.019247353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022812175,0.0000146575485,0.00030614212,0.00066906656,0.000010914359,0.00013455315,0.0010965546,0.00026650392,0.000069825495,0.9789923,0.018397529,0.000019069304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029133887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025238274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.103212446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007173247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014423254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5458461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313308139","doi":"10.1136/jme-2022-108813","title":"Why there is no dilemma for the birth strategy: a response to Bobier and Omelianchuk","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Autonomy; Abortion; Argument (complex analysis); Moral dilemma; Personal autonomy; Therapeutic abortion; Psychology; Intuition; Social psychology; Medicine; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.05010555082351278,"score_gpt":0.3764296481301047,"score_spread":0.32632409730659195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313308139","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006602972,0.0024627051,0.00035082438,0.9927899,0.001281162,0.0000033547772,0.0000041252815,0.0000064381597,0.0024411948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07350443,0.0039149304,0.0013295201,0.90933293,0.006381593,0.000054162512,0.000009617295,0.000051591473,0.0054212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98440033,0.009066497,0.00050988176,0.0018863181,0.0028697473,0.0012671311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95537084,0.035504732,0.0014273323,0.00088596175,0.0042233225,0.0025877268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029288877,0.00068217254,0.0018148912,0.0010491987,0.009057986,0.009633138,0.0040124557,0.039706968,0.0041277516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05698905,0.00065076316,0.0010237333,0.00087645685,0.044824053,0.021771345,0.006491436,0.058252934,0.0011515986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007708987,0.000058481837,0.00021837662,0.00008984777,0.000015581785,0.0003598462,0.005996461,0.00017280615,0.0001529225,0.7050451,0.2812508,0.006562723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014753886,0.00004666633,0.00036392594,0.00053478853,0.000016917647,0.00038156536,0.009806992,0.0006701338,0.000285999,0.5579858,0.4296315,0.00012815955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00958662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008166867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039706968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008789659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007588577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1548962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319591417","doi":"10.1136/jme-2022-108731","title":"Conscientious commitment, professional obligations and abortion provision after the reversal of<i>Roe v Wade</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Uehiro Foundation on Ethics and Education; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Obligation; Conscience; Abortion; Sanctions; Law; Moral obligation; Political science; Health professionals; Professional responsibility; Health care; Professional conduct; Professional ethics; Conscientious objector; Public relations; Business","score_opus":0.044988007105758294,"score_gpt":0.41302367260678835,"score_spread":0.36803566550103006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319591417","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25071186,0.0030541567,0.0039868406,0.4491971,0.002054498,0.00015029818,0.00006498357,0.000059064587,0.2907212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86653787,0.00047649667,0.0010740974,0.112847455,0.0003609613,0.00011001468,0.000027326354,0.00002201517,0.018543877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858516,0.005414512,0.00079541164,0.0013368202,0.0019208802,0.004680758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849685,0.008228071,0.0023066413,0.0012049287,0.0012603711,0.0020315747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014495438,0.00014876187,0.00038162974,0.0007231888,0.008670291,0.0064455704,0.0017633958,0.020273639,0.003435868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042453405,0.00041944775,0.0008452112,0.00035175835,0.01847351,0.0040924535,0.006522635,0.022364933,0.00058337965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072041206,0.00014622645,0.005135937,0.00003947792,0.000023358776,0.0020680297,0.022866305,0.00023753803,0.0005949791,0.9390079,0.016765641,0.013042677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021974121,0.00033710126,0.028656993,0.0013473766,0.0001351065,0.0033926193,0.03907409,0.001513041,0.0026525338,0.46477342,0.45750755,0.00039037992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04129793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.069965065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04129793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050611794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016771605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082115114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367048460","doi":"10.1136/jme-2022-108871","title":"Choosing death in unjust conditions: hope, autonomy and harm reduction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Optimism, Hope, and Well-being","field":"Psychology","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Argument (complex analysis); Injustice; Harm; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.07822555958557753,"score_gpt":0.4268559696965457,"score_spread":0.3486304101109682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367048460","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15475933,0.014825677,0.027773986,0.37756604,0.0017084439,0.000116628406,0.00003962772,0.00003992455,0.4231703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98543465,0.0015519554,0.001151362,0.008133174,0.00022972796,0.000030073606,0.000006288057,0.000008272458,0.0034544284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99255,0.0046589603,0.00020395964,0.000382054,0.000999068,0.0012058308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99519277,0.0027457676,0.0007069895,0.00027424897,0.0003742863,0.00070596946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010930908,0.0003279743,0.00039094954,0.0006751637,0.0063599744,0.006178931,0.0010054389,0.0047873044,0.0015676379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010946855,0.00019007485,0.00066406716,0.00041690943,0.061753344,0.0070374366,0.008613939,0.008642781,0.00018572765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016435639,0.00001973545,0.0005393533,0.000032293476,0.00000777396,0.00023404499,0.014637783,0.00017911852,0.00006428182,0.9784831,0.0017211112,0.004064967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026539761,0.00004177895,0.0009816219,0.00022369009,0.0000141928995,0.00041975384,0.020468157,0.00036656123,0.00020667442,0.9331259,0.044095043,0.000029974186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045366804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00575317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010930908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050573917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038847253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057808876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377970626","doi":"10.1136/jme-2023-109163","title":"University-age vaccine mandates: reply to Lam and Nichols","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Computer science; Medicine; Data science","score_opus":0.05674516991293532,"score_gpt":0.38285988003921334,"score_spread":0.326114710126278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377970626","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021471104,0.0027823937,0.0000704712,0.97181106,0.024749395,0.000009099699,0.000078486104,0.000015394637,0.00026900918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015915167,0.0015211775,0.00023774912,0.96383655,0.031737268,0.00004457429,0.00002822128,0.000022551976,0.0009804415],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886453,0.004379332,0.0022853604,0.0016494541,0.0024789637,0.0005615705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88989854,0.079341404,0.004215809,0.0032862732,0.017684009,0.0055740303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023382839,0.001366058,0.002572868,0.0015639032,0.0028267591,0.003195647,0.0050891987,0.040368948,0.0070865573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12475945,0.0013688334,0.002150718,0.0019568615,0.005210643,0.007941908,0.0020977207,0.057563834,0.0043024756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016004166,0.000025987174,0.0005704579,0.00018172595,0.000041976567,0.00017456459,0.00011179125,0.000045553876,0.00005017746,0.0011880993,0.99122274,0.006226899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004908229,0.00022253512,0.0040686266,0.0019009007,0.00021368935,0.0014802627,0.0012806007,0.0004905646,0.0006179448,0.0106698,0.97823125,0.00033296115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010790867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01066396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040368948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004299094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060138456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12366176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378211709","doi":"10.1136/jme-2022-108781","title":"Patient data for commercial companies? An ethical framework for sharing patients’ data with for-profit companies for research","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Terry Fox Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Data sharing; Normative; Public relations; Business; Profit (economics); Medical ethics; Public health; Medical research; Research ethics; Empirical research; Order (exchange); Normative model of decision-making; Knowledge management; Medicine; Political science; Engineering ethics; Economics; Computer science; Alternative medicine; Law; Nursing; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.8693394198951242,"score_gpt":0.6976869539436653,"score_spread":0.1716524659514589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378211709","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022858694,0.0026768271,0.23140946,0.61044496,0.0017466969,0.0016982476,0.00013123947,0.000112779475,0.12892105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7574467,0.0015124247,0.14291985,0.08195271,0.0019924461,0.0034316608,0.00014046412,0.000110455505,0.010493359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6099332,0.32962257,0.013120224,0.00951337,0.03040987,0.0074007288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.61761683,0.27669016,0.018310612,0.043413837,0.032512218,0.011456402],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.29121983,0.0010168682,0.0012981935,0.0029254758,0.013777186,0.026761444,0.005354256,0.02978701,0.003524505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27552155,0.0012523284,0.0017375437,0.0026257455,0.07003651,0.027167171,0.016624993,0.021087138,0.0012745819],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015262145,0.000035447534,0.00033470578,0.000036592402,0.000008992832,0.00015313955,0.00690915,0.00019371192,0.0001130276,0.98556244,0.0031100428,0.003527442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058310754,0.000055187087,0.00027800203,0.00056669913,0.000020817966,0.00060339255,0.006863021,0.0020477544,0.0004410279,0.9301697,0.05882466,0.00007139798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025771165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023234268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.970213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011394648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038862865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87405217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378781679","doi":"10.1136/jme-2022-108866","title":"The ethics of firing unvaccinated employees","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Vaccination; Measles; Medicine; Business; Public relations; Political science; Immunology","score_opus":0.10323783324759633,"score_gpt":0.43739089928932207,"score_spread":0.33415306604172573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378781679","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24965176,0.008670229,0.020864515,0.42400157,0.0024385864,0.00016302936,0.00004294391,0.00003390747,0.2941335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.958604,0.0011225339,0.0024932285,0.024511617,0.0005265768,0.00008173078,0.0000064678143,0.00001156872,0.012642377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9559596,0.034234244,0.0014507375,0.0013384195,0.0043588793,0.0026581935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96199226,0.026484136,0.003614823,0.0028292283,0.0027659936,0.0023135992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021276297,0.00021889893,0.0003408143,0.0003672608,0.005178981,0.0049813977,0.00094739965,0.008056658,0.0012147792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03546463,0.0003159335,0.00026825207,0.00027364783,0.030353036,0.002248092,0.0030503033,0.006416355,0.00049062254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053382042,0.000048227943,0.0027891533,0.00006474177,0.000015375728,0.00059605984,0.020189075,0.00032273817,0.00054907677,0.9539842,0.008489641,0.012898372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006814289,0.00022391634,0.0053487318,0.00066993537,0.00002337547,0.0014750982,0.0161173,0.0018841672,0.0017506534,0.7497657,0.22257811,0.00009489293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029490874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023686658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021276297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027030127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058482527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11252117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379983373","doi":"10.1136/jme-2022-108825","title":"Blaming the unvaccinated during the COVID-19 pandemic: the roles of political ideology and risk perceptions in the USA","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of Otago","keywords":"Scapegoating; Vignette; Misinformation; Blame; Vaccination; Pandemic; Prejudice (legal term); Ideology; Social psychology; Risk perception; Politics; Scapegoat; Public health; Psychology; Medicine; Criminology; Perception; Immunology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Disease; Political science; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Law","score_opus":0.2169085318955633,"score_gpt":0.4226901964965032,"score_spread":0.20578166460093988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379983373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998901,0.000025282387,0.00007851049,0.00028266944,0.0000059264157,0.0000042003226,0.000010993615,6.3165135e-7,0.0006906259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99956924,0.00003791885,0.00008005784,0.00018821986,0.0000057416264,0.000006050386,0.000019640192,7.0978064e-7,0.00009232494],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792993,0.0015516251,0.000047066314,0.000116747826,0.00018165463,0.00017295397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919145,0.004428184,0.0019359292,0.00036763976,0.0006225049,0.00073114556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030797925,0.00014936281,0.00017914835,0.0003134084,0.0010518929,0.0015236667,0.00024069245,0.0006047013,0.0013334868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013207493,0.0001947836,0.00025755027,0.00029612082,0.0011282585,0.0007732784,0.00099635,0.0015371499,0.00009527099],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014829084,0.0026406914,0.8638131,0.00012814582,0.00024182006,0.00034230764,0.100827,0.0005033915,0.0027448842,0.0016799122,0.0021335834,0.023462187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004482322,0.0005755687,0.94216824,0.00009024289,0.00008624507,0.00011197425,0.050606597,0.0021053627,0.0006646525,0.0010544821,0.0024296355,0.00006217844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011081139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021878822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011081139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084756897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073891145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022033274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383226457","doi":"10.1136/jme-2023-109061","title":"Guerrilla eugenics: gene drives in heritable human genome editing","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"CRISPR and Genetic Engineering","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Genome editing; Eugenics; CRISPR; Genome; Bioethics; Genetics; Biology; Human genome; Human genetics; Cas9; Gene","score_opus":0.024889606380148005,"score_gpt":0.38250375514905777,"score_spread":0.35761414876890973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383226457","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038779706,0.024473978,0.19853377,0.3619851,0.0059169387,0.00026863912,0.00015368205,0.00078613986,0.36910212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6394714,0.014506167,0.107465014,0.16786529,0.0019157729,0.00071275176,0.00009854522,0.000249427,0.067715615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871689,0.0077409977,0.0004451345,0.0010473144,0.003023911,0.00057365664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98703384,0.009722665,0.0010724929,0.0013151567,0.00047935813,0.000376502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01551789,0.00038140698,0.000404913,0.00050865713,0.0022783645,0.004050233,0.0010339973,0.006984921,0.0019474169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023574369,0.0002995532,0.00049711065,0.0004200263,0.017811637,0.0035835905,0.005102691,0.008095017,0.0006976015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027345104,0.000013842318,0.0004986558,0.00010107317,0.000010852223,0.00028775088,0.0016547507,0.00031939757,0.0013060665,0.9586856,0.010834969,0.026259733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026512393,0.0001364843,0.0010496826,0.00067048374,0.000035479054,0.0021275878,0.0009882046,0.0012678149,0.0060076965,0.50299984,0.48461443,0.00007583251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015017199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002494832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01551789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018091921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023584273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08206743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384337927","doi":"10.1136/jme-2023-109327","title":"Medically assisted dying in Canada and unjust social conditions: a response to Wiebe and Mullin","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Optimism, Hope, and Well-being","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Horizon Health Network; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; Dalhousie University; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Medicine; Data science; Computer science","score_opus":0.059660416526296195,"score_gpt":0.40755795476036616,"score_spread":0.34789753823407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384337927","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003604088,0.0075063366,0.000031008483,0.98595536,0.005381241,0.000005371125,0.000009838704,0.0000044529293,0.0007460444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0069765267,0.006946442,0.00018134242,0.9779585,0.00507505,0.000019775007,0.000012708204,0.000025821004,0.0028039075],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9785785,0.0062112184,0.0013430185,0.0027651286,0.0068180724,0.0042840242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9299313,0.034235004,0.0025121588,0.0009475153,0.013931153,0.01844298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01948649,0.0011967807,0.0025311343,0.0020500205,0.04862056,0.015317577,0.007036353,0.06768782,0.0050762547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0472538,0.0014068487,0.0018343568,0.0039580986,0.031216025,0.013183335,0.008490585,0.080821656,0.00067211967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032142332,0.000043751403,0.0004673165,0.00018377426,0.000014316264,0.00064066186,0.009544745,0.000075788885,0.000099533245,0.014915429,0.96596986,0.008012674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005000848,0.00004343482,0.001767285,0.0011711945,0.000020900163,0.0009107946,0.02340107,0.00021384221,0.00011133043,0.0077119875,0.96438664,0.00021145811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7838104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8902536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21618962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10164277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14429772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73747337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384922373","doi":"10.1136/jme-2023-109183","title":"Existential spectrum of suffering: concepts and moral valuations for assessing intensity and tolerability","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Counterexample; Tolerability; Neglect; Existentialism; Psychology; Broad spectrum; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Psychiatry; Medicine; Philosophy; Alternative medicine; Mathematics","score_opus":0.27853683274919244,"score_gpt":0.46308719353538597,"score_spread":0.18455036078619352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384922373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7060635,0.002449771,0.17705914,0.0046214415,0.00028488226,0.0011301037,0.00042410492,0.00014631521,0.10782064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97224694,0.00042255476,0.025707522,0.00027161962,0.000066067805,0.00064542517,0.0000861261,0.000021512704,0.0005321727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915543,0.0051943394,0.0008001913,0.00039123636,0.0016930569,0.0003668196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97959137,0.012622578,0.0034817753,0.0013600588,0.0016609059,0.0012832504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013165054,0.0005798526,0.00044615418,0.005220673,0.0013013714,0.003194077,0.0011097568,0.0012144436,0.0035838292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042070407,0.00028418665,0.0009954016,0.0019627635,0.0106067415,0.007161944,0.007779657,0.0027625745,0.00024374198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071159704,0.00071657245,0.17021698,0.001823957,0.00031051092,0.00093041366,0.15098974,0.0031401792,0.010031822,0.4356252,0.0032539403,0.22224914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000106162224,0.0013992294,0.2503141,0.0016560036,0.00023435934,0.003924689,0.14915934,0.0113888625,0.0051652296,0.55038023,0.025873303,0.00039850775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003131193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043089132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013165054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011936027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083983236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069624305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385197054","doi":"10.1136/jme-2022-108687","title":"<i>Sabr</i>and<i>Shukr</i>: doing justice to medical futility","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Medical Research and Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"SABR volatility model; Economic Justice; Psychology; Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.31777610386720434,"score_gpt":0.6276954937020801,"score_spread":0.30991938983487577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385197054","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025818478,0.00287747,0.0024068821,0.9290192,0.0041360855,0.000013231647,0.000012649771,0.00005411803,0.05889836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.279739,0.0042508063,0.005241604,0.65033436,0.0069909487,0.00010440809,0.000020750618,0.00031292316,0.053005304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98231274,0.0110377455,0.0005700741,0.0010080506,0.0030822265,0.0019891488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9662025,0.021845177,0.0020178526,0.0019403786,0.004260258,0.0037338198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016427075,0.00043268368,0.0006191293,0.0010143481,0.013174926,0.018887926,0.0020777856,0.025880573,0.0075161033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05494371,0.0005276245,0.00057863304,0.0009202812,0.055752147,0.0145342,0.0075179706,0.034657057,0.0020833663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016719992,0.00001683892,0.00037200833,0.000062623156,0.000022133667,0.00023809167,0.01510997,0.00010164238,0.00012169722,0.5568747,0.41491213,0.012151437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000265861,0.000017049782,0.0007348604,0.00045549503,0.000027365524,0.0006624924,0.021856882,0.00043355484,0.00046887354,0.6335501,0.3416816,0.0000850159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012310012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023016449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025880573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006239668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017250359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08687568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385975899","doi":"10.1136/jme-2023-109410","title":"Vaccine mandates for prospective versus existing employees: reply to Smith","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Argument (complex analysis); Prospective cohort study; Psychological intervention; Actuarial science; Psychology; Public relations; Business; Medicine; Law; Political science; Surgery; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.13496927927844693,"score_gpt":0.4564557404982805,"score_spread":0.3214864612198336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385975899","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040880402,0.0009029479,0.000061638035,0.9953755,0.0026785745,0.000002487941,0.000012925604,0.0000048990764,0.00055220944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007363234,0.0013028824,0.00018313626,0.9833347,0.006327804,0.000015273154,0.000008022111,0.000012402916,0.0014525335],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99411845,0.0021127702,0.00066938787,0.0012551148,0.0013424098,0.00050187524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9318965,0.05710447,0.0020906548,0.0011372033,0.0056303027,0.0021409325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012784775,0.0006970805,0.0013247959,0.0008177263,0.0031703792,0.0037627658,0.0035948253,0.058950853,0.0051238067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0654381,0.00080736895,0.0012627508,0.0010878609,0.010284849,0.011094833,0.0030190742,0.056453574,0.0018805079],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007495807,0.00003071753,0.00068956986,0.00013797937,0.00002423125,0.0006998438,0.0009522155,0.00013974169,0.0001897144,0.028154092,0.9605663,0.008340654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001976105,0.00015133689,0.0035695063,0.0011727412,0.00010427353,0.0033731747,0.008657896,0.00095099944,0.0012614205,0.07732945,0.9029022,0.00032948403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008094193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008490858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058950853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005702408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061802515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067613184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386365175","doi":"10.1136/jme-2023-109498","title":"Academic freedom under siege","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Siege; Warrant; Academic freedom; Bioethics; Politics; Sociology; Political science; Global justice; Law; Law and economics; Public relations; Economics; Higher education","score_opus":0.32395826831330243,"score_gpt":0.6108742725623971,"score_spread":0.2869160042490947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386365175","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08805376,0.0029174099,0.0072748587,0.14088643,0.0013526172,0.00006468857,0.00011359761,0.00016431321,0.7591723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90583575,0.0010053817,0.0014477144,0.032977182,0.0014058525,0.00011679867,0.00007477068,0.0001142725,0.057022292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821384,0.005025738,0.00056981586,0.0023788838,0.0056357356,0.0042514196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832283,0.0055064913,0.001737561,0.00252097,0.0025431493,0.004463641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016846225,0.00054356473,0.0010159275,0.003420527,0.015298954,0.01762491,0.0010543198,0.0063308356,0.01270337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03258725,0.00032769612,0.00091417064,0.0024261707,0.03799752,0.011325975,0.024416035,0.012703508,0.002306706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020564006,0.000023233195,0.0013517018,0.000021342274,0.0000069422954,0.00009142614,0.005779418,0.0001669593,0.000064169406,0.96284246,0.011343286,0.018288514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035338166,0.00005276551,0.0030150188,0.0002191078,0.000008978776,0.0002425848,0.00592397,0.0003446461,0.00018244465,0.6188371,0.37110627,0.00003188734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008023945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007735231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01762491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009033801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0135486135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08909243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387950451","doi":"10.1136/jme-2023-109425","title":"Consent to testing for brain death","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Informed consent; Duty; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Guideline; Nothing; Psychology; Authorization; Medicine; Political science; Alternative medicine; Computer science; Computer security; Philosophy; Epistemology; Pathology","score_opus":0.2700990621690148,"score_gpt":0.4771288001788872,"score_spread":0.2070297380098724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387950451","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012312143,0.008625562,0.01645278,0.62555367,0.014808738,0.0036780518,0.0018179456,0.00032610912,0.31642509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18470454,0.008839568,0.014468354,0.6692436,0.004042555,0.002237153,0.0016372481,0.0002400585,0.11458697],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96407694,0.014689675,0.0053018937,0.0023517772,0.008186938,0.005392793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9107658,0.053173035,0.0029933183,0.008333604,0.018871719,0.0058624386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032350548,0.0005163392,0.001162524,0.0011660563,0.005653986,0.0044776658,0.0020912017,0.019200502,0.015112549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11997637,0.0006992928,0.0013053165,0.0009894638,0.0062572937,0.0030826472,0.003793459,0.015485325,0.0054283305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019825151,0.00012593967,0.0035793094,0.0006146664,0.00003920772,0.004764295,0.011044818,0.00017552087,0.0019393958,0.1349826,0.7647463,0.077789694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014187042,0.00010685467,0.0031266073,0.0023868866,0.00004161471,0.0038354858,0.0021780387,0.00031263105,0.0010526956,0.026086675,0.9606028,0.0001277653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0882365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11431641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0882365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006449749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056461804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17544585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388540984","doi":"10.1136/jme-2023-109549","title":"Exploring the potential utility of AI large language models for medical ethics: an expert panel evaluation of GPT-4","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; London Health Sciences Centre; Alberta Health Services; University Health Network; University of Toronto; Dalhousie University; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences; The Scarborough Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Readability; Counterintuitive; Beneficence; Psychology; Medical ethics; Intraclass correlation; Reliability (semiconductor); Medical education; Engineering ethics; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Psychometrics; Clinical psychology; Epistemology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.7501689367813249,"score_gpt":0.592878808201445,"score_spread":0.1572901285798799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388540984","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9158415,0.00029181977,0.05372193,0.0037397803,0.00017475979,0.009596571,0.0006783719,0.0004040968,0.01555111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8380904,0.00034499032,0.14288224,0.0015015431,0.00011000006,0.01395666,0.0010010774,0.00014392566,0.001969101],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.75368166,0.22221212,0.008101824,0.0034642036,0.010577745,0.001962413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.44452712,0.4622377,0.018918596,0.026793657,0.04232732,0.005195675],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.23457478,0.0010448054,0.0009771348,0.002058916,0.0015619195,0.0042411443,0.0028488082,0.002336942,0.0036152164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.35271943,0.000742969,0.0020073825,0.0015650503,0.0029493535,0.0037160446,0.00906661,0.003577507,0.0010042413],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0065415273,0.007431778,0.20701702,0.0061473385,0.0007527148,0.0020138468,0.24843754,0.0377579,0.0136144385,0.012013116,0.014728195,0.4435446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006688829,0.031907152,0.25216934,0.008257753,0.001477636,0.0035353499,0.15071574,0.3093552,0.028451066,0.053257328,0.15218359,0.0020010935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001445671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032605117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7654252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043899724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005868985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9439056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388705729","doi":"10.1136/jme-2023-109472","title":"Caring as the unacknowledged matrix of evidence-based nursing","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Virtue; Nursing care; Conversation; Normative; Nursing; Nursing ethics; Feminist ethics; Engineering ethics; Virtue ethics; Argument (complex analysis); Psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Medicine; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.4706264749917194,"score_gpt":0.6391155586408688,"score_spread":0.16848908364914938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388705729","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0077365683,0.072917715,0.15257339,0.5721651,0.008771719,0.00022593906,0.00008173443,0.00015586375,0.18537205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.699084,0.04717483,0.1746763,0.05691853,0.007778206,0.0012325502,0.00012342217,0.0001795561,0.012832622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8896544,0.081770696,0.005360507,0.004772116,0.016883206,0.0015590178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87672734,0.096706,0.0043811873,0.0105405105,0.007859636,0.003785264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10248501,0.0012182752,0.0022740632,0.0052621723,0.0107024675,0.028556505,0.005133061,0.0116088465,0.0036597908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.093668,0.0010410983,0.0008953891,0.0030000056,0.11970507,0.038591873,0.022855718,0.017519519,0.0010515357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012066777,0.000015689102,0.00008921398,0.00034965912,0.000012794963,0.000070688104,0.007582335,0.000260738,0.000083453226,0.9720692,0.0030145647,0.016439725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009246861,0.000024269892,0.00006905389,0.0015029463,0.000007775372,0.00010483238,0.0034543655,0.00038012755,0.00009526519,0.92591864,0.068409346,0.000024102988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021714773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002446889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10248501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009138314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01830919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.541999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390333652","doi":"10.1136/jme-2023-109797","title":"No consent for brain death testing","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Informed consent; Duty; Law; Psychology; Medicine; Psychiatry; Political science; Alternative medicine; Pathology","score_opus":0.24339505789583127,"score_gpt":0.45769475862108727,"score_spread":0.214299700725256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390333652","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05477015,0.008173972,0.04352431,0.42850685,0.017643685,0.0050715916,0.0023081067,0.00041774288,0.43958354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5400017,0.0037428353,0.015080397,0.3582256,0.003951514,0.0039637336,0.0016515203,0.00019549906,0.07318719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9241141,0.038446113,0.009248837,0.005764858,0.01495309,0.0074729836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9145523,0.048887033,0.004095618,0.016541207,0.010785363,0.005138543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06474239,0.00054306915,0.0011253217,0.00095380517,0.0035704363,0.00470395,0.0028137178,0.015061087,0.016564948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15009566,0.00068967434,0.0012300238,0.00059777906,0.007248843,0.0050220075,0.0059528663,0.013468972,0.0048411326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006769822,0.00024986098,0.006286536,0.00086936646,0.00010072179,0.007066508,0.00925317,0.0002772734,0.0039178543,0.5842298,0.2686993,0.11837255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035906077,0.00040553213,0.0044304105,0.0038636848,0.00010010408,0.010429816,0.003272739,0.000843447,0.0033388156,0.18415773,0.7886102,0.00018839346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003561155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006308981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06474239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033468714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021501934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34239453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390450366","doi":"10.1136/jme-2023-109739","title":"The name of the game: a Wittgensteinian view of ‘invasiveness’","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Computer science; Data science; Philosophy; World Wide Web; Psychology","score_opus":0.10532174792513928,"score_gpt":0.33026521465493835,"score_spread":0.2249434667297991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390450366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018704444,0.01378442,0.1120819,0.2700536,0.005004452,0.000101644466,0.00012775228,0.0001322378,0.5800096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86865854,0.00277139,0.02104503,0.04922314,0.004359946,0.00032043117,0.00004423082,0.00024531598,0.053331994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912321,0.005132789,0.0003266232,0.0012119691,0.0013001668,0.00079632073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918113,0.0057937605,0.00045903062,0.00085798046,0.0005909424,0.0004870695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011104668,0.0007283797,0.00095268764,0.0019905705,0.0055844304,0.007905062,0.002259901,0.010730479,0.005193392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015919212,0.00072424335,0.0009775679,0.0011741192,0.10189952,0.016730554,0.005032304,0.016302448,0.00082809647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033218048,0.0000026506502,0.000014241436,0.0000053318367,0.000001469427,0.00000825363,0.0005465502,0.000030546864,0.000013337176,0.99782556,0.001097967,0.00045085925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006837927,0.0000049883606,0.000021955382,0.000018677805,0.0000022436686,0.000021175709,0.00017240286,0.00012680597,0.00002608025,0.9887565,0.010836956,0.0000053539866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028161083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002246511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011104668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00423902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0587278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392154032","doi":"10.1136/jme-2023-109563","title":"Ladders and stairs: how the intervention ladder focuses blame on individuals and obscures systemic failings and interventions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Health disparities and outcomes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; Psychological intervention; Intervention (counseling); Stairs; Psychology; Computer security; Criminology; Social psychology; Computer science; Psychiatry; Engineering","score_opus":0.10396347375071407,"score_gpt":0.446165445643127,"score_spread":0.3422019718924129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392154032","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03215954,0.010126671,0.5018074,0.24966131,0.004399204,0.0007082174,0.0002164657,0.0012700496,0.19965108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6770498,0.004747922,0.243459,0.039763134,0.00067735935,0.0014465912,0.00013418298,0.00071276724,0.03200926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95279217,0.03633485,0.0011759044,0.003227288,0.004754077,0.0017157708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9589493,0.027175201,0.002190267,0.006795087,0.0026549157,0.0022351781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037844364,0.0014834865,0.0012525831,0.0039446647,0.008327186,0.014172765,0.0032893522,0.009879403,0.009128212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053214967,0.0011251657,0.0015742877,0.0023321141,0.0879637,0.027484287,0.014260072,0.013270017,0.0019174261],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074118056,0.00007457837,0.0011168054,0.00027370892,0.000030352672,0.00012262215,0.019573154,0.0007260222,0.00028467498,0.9359329,0.008359393,0.03343178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063523155,0.00015046552,0.00079365756,0.00093582494,0.000045968412,0.00023676449,0.007910801,0.0019343267,0.0004962539,0.87463146,0.112727046,0.00007380757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077494998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010404705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037844364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010456166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017058289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2001425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392452288","doi":"10.1136/jme-2023-109555","title":"Words matter: ‘enduring intolerable suffering’ and the provider-side peril of Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vetting; Argument (complex analysis); Legislation; Terminology; CLARITY; Law; Psychology; Medicine; Psychiatry; Political science","score_opus":0.07762384026849153,"score_gpt":0.4710796919623483,"score_spread":0.3934558516938568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392452288","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13907038,0.011770372,0.0013076933,0.64850265,0.0025564802,0.00007975729,0.00036946172,0.00003814739,0.1963051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9071226,0.0052729277,0.00094156264,0.051872715,0.00037093225,0.0000206994,0.00008730752,0.000037973718,0.034273364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954057,0.0009165253,0.00017898204,0.00031379482,0.0016382651,0.0015467913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864981,0.0029163382,0.001038669,0.00021477875,0.0038335752,0.005498572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026000352,0.00017676571,0.00029672278,0.00072520337,0.019077409,0.0067591723,0.0016908362,0.0032460035,0.012652809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016253106,0.0001849208,0.00024601133,0.0015147893,0.013321593,0.0020793206,0.003972549,0.006061255,0.0005601267],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016018517,0.00007802433,0.043552104,0.000661552,0.00003286427,0.003869517,0.124868676,0.00065108784,0.0006350403,0.42428422,0.31007802,0.09112876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049610542,0.000053256023,0.07485825,0.0017922473,0.000040278843,0.0023297851,0.1727054,0.00079774065,0.00049728295,0.032252323,0.7144137,0.00020997023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98263943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9943317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09781244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09781244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22860551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7096822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394759106","doi":"10.1136/jme-2023-109702","title":"AI and the falling sky: interrogating X-Risk","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Falling (accident); Sky; Data science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Medicine; Astronomy; Physics; Environmental health","score_opus":0.06793008412189912,"score_gpt":0.47300655205397196,"score_spread":0.40507646793207286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394759106","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11841996,0.011377437,0.08706428,0.37195867,0.002036445,0.00013475922,0.000087856664,0.00009609742,0.40882444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97143114,0.0014707425,0.00441937,0.016768765,0.0004866674,0.00007719983,0.000013507288,0.00004807964,0.0052844505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9679497,0.024549235,0.00078931585,0.0016208435,0.00330126,0.0017895673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9478878,0.04029059,0.004328435,0.0025422005,0.0033591099,0.0015918656],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03511105,0.00060904335,0.00075212476,0.0022549648,0.012227836,0.017979262,0.0022381342,0.012452385,0.005808642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04587264,0.0005218588,0.00068579416,0.001688642,0.08446428,0.02083909,0.016170949,0.012886886,0.0006173186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018334276,0.00001526595,0.0007428191,0.000052237214,0.000008760756,0.00025840203,0.024579603,0.00024214646,0.000083097315,0.9680122,0.0024317328,0.0035554061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008988979,0.000027465776,0.0005099147,0.0003672624,0.000008707782,0.000327469,0.030930003,0.00072284846,0.00022398996,0.91182375,0.05501965,0.000029903602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024998647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018962296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98777217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00635424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051207235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18568724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400060659","doi":"10.1136/jme-2023-108917","title":"Ethical issues in residency education related to the COVID-19 pandemic: a narrative inquiry study","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hospital for Sick Children; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Narrative; Health care; Public health; Medical education; Nonprobability sampling; Medical ethics; Duty; Ethical issues; Research ethics; Psychology; Medicine; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Public relations; Nursing; Engineering ethics; Political science; Pathology; Law","score_opus":0.3521322570414868,"score_gpt":0.6703403286062593,"score_spread":0.31820807156477243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400060659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9754671,0.0018021245,0.002934904,0.01218835,0.00014118468,0.0002456572,0.0000918044,0.000017656877,0.007111334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910472,0.0024856632,0.0019274077,0.0015359806,0.00006116912,0.00025438322,0.000049520488,0.000015708809,0.0026230072],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875952,0.009983212,0.00033119068,0.00043222297,0.0006081104,0.0010501136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.970982,0.020783793,0.0030449773,0.00044025146,0.0017082274,0.00304081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016791983,0.0005790264,0.000660585,0.0013100348,0.010707639,0.0055671814,0.001703942,0.0026719347,0.0019831103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02911443,0.0006437773,0.00043479688,0.0013872749,0.0095894,0.00594755,0.006658405,0.0045725573,0.0002677612],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000119158685,0.00003690444,0.0016316468,0.00011342439,0.0000034753796,0.0009957132,0.99242836,0.000036962025,0.00014169802,0.0014639866,0.0007474118,0.0023885232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002604275,0.00003292409,0.00078587496,0.00020500344,0.0000033008423,0.0005991658,0.9874681,0.00009070455,0.00009553567,0.00039371656,0.010315114,0.000007831986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004285853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0090947095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016791983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00546664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008296804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08880556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400356374","doi":"10.1136/jme-2024-110161","title":"The intervention ladder and the ethical appraisal of systemic public health interventions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Public Health Policies and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychological intervention; Intervention (counseling); Public health interventions; Public health; Medicine; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Nursing; Engineering","score_opus":0.21905977008635938,"score_gpt":0.6022176517355041,"score_spread":0.38315788164914477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400356374","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031587936,0.010194287,0.50973994,0.27492845,0.0015205175,0.0022544023,0.0003075409,0.0003999279,0.16906695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6908045,0.002851716,0.2869603,0.01172389,0.00058138533,0.0029296158,0.0001191108,0.00014072262,0.0038887532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6756764,0.27793643,0.011734073,0.0048011835,0.02627766,0.0035742745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.46793336,0.46805683,0.02119306,0.017390447,0.018358044,0.0070683463],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.23353955,0.0015753522,0.002862209,0.010370374,0.006804115,0.015968155,0.003705309,0.013428716,0.010693919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.33669335,0.0013944508,0.0027387047,0.0041263993,0.07196097,0.024384348,0.017149603,0.014823967,0.00080559944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011667378,0.00016976713,0.0014759918,0.0006987967,0.00008480042,0.00012585979,0.0030744607,0.002459192,0.00014828138,0.9562818,0.003025347,0.032339115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007109084,0.000085992775,0.00061600993,0.00078636076,0.000027557458,0.0000701104,0.0017803238,0.002848526,0.00014634267,0.9887294,0.004811378,0.000026798627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021967816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029294787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23353955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016819702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043321006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9451822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401330783","doi":"10.1136/jme-2024-110326","title":"The intervention stairway: a defence and clarifications","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Accounting and Organizational Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Intervention (counseling); Computer science; Data science; Computer security; Psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.017979900589197663,"score_gpt":0.3124926935415326,"score_spread":0.2945127929523349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401330783","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004231371,0.0034444584,0.0001777411,0.2482961,0.74644893,0.00002119483,0.000024128165,0.00002839229,0.001516643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009713164,0.001809686,0.00039906258,0.23925167,0.75113636,0.000083175,0.000008888616,0.000039605886,0.006300208],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9607697,0.01298014,0.00718264,0.004250696,0.012234424,0.0025824578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8324467,0.107091606,0.008590347,0.0061127846,0.03671382,0.009044748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04463892,0.003548715,0.005457908,0.0051568095,0.008634034,0.018710975,0.008170797,0.10489027,0.008860821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18484452,0.0020251994,0.0041801655,0.0030703084,0.01714286,0.013121778,0.005223705,0.08529669,0.0067784907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027914788,0.000009595023,0.000026348658,0.00019921672,0.000024977522,0.00011918212,0.000103423066,0.000022365162,0.00004177749,0.004729845,0.9913572,0.0033381903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009962191,0.000025436932,0.00019511256,0.0011578513,0.000084162435,0.000260538,0.00022651699,0.00022468714,0.0000944429,0.011372857,0.986204,0.000054652584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005327299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012909464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10489027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009806089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017110992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.236076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401356475","doi":"10.1136/jme-2024-110307","title":"Birth’s transformative shift: a response to Waleszczyński","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06822217629671663,"score_gpt":0.4652542541486391,"score_spread":0.39703207785192246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401356475","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002030353,0.0027957242,0.00064204837,0.98727894,0.0023015353,0.000004790438,0.00000766113,0.000008739805,0.004930299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07848377,0.003244279,0.0008601957,0.9053382,0.002617923,0.000044892942,0.00000934003,0.00007633969,0.009325017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98886836,0.00599664,0.00058456423,0.0013877912,0.002071079,0.0010915683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9809325,0.014651855,0.001004853,0.00047989198,0.0017372365,0.0011937552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01813553,0.0006239521,0.0008974201,0.00071450963,0.010150006,0.0076074456,0.0024719622,0.025627319,0.003194248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03963374,0.00075647177,0.00077119103,0.0010224773,0.035181392,0.015180499,0.008811837,0.06250042,0.000999655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005785345,0.00002062063,0.0002966802,0.00010289962,0.000010823976,0.0010288589,0.03861185,0.00013416508,0.00035973502,0.6878004,0.2649558,0.006620377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032220865,0.00002852964,0.00047914244,0.00052975724,0.000010870089,0.0008611365,0.023036288,0.00022842384,0.00058782176,0.16509277,0.80901664,0.0000963783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014908176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015208926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025627319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00866587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008266233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095911026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402016286","doi":"10.1136/jme-2024-110137","title":"Providing medically assisted dying in Canada: a qualitative study of emotional and moral impact","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.34872899301070304,"score_gpt":0.5587180846129748,"score_spread":0.20998909160227175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402016286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863359,0.0008519023,0.001050121,0.0040193554,0.00008936961,0.00019731275,0.00020203157,0.000020509093,0.0072335526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993978,0.0007494386,0.000689393,0.001064655,0.000017642167,0.000131318,0.000054654836,0.000026616377,0.0032882702],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925809,0.004369034,0.00015253638,0.0003727257,0.00087992515,0.0016448136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98003733,0.012415182,0.001214022,0.00033604214,0.0028342241,0.0031632895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008659101,0.0005548608,0.0008044242,0.0016036585,0.027015034,0.0053940685,0.0021621964,0.002081351,0.003021551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017180476,0.00056502735,0.00037120283,0.0024946183,0.013872341,0.0026434548,0.004548883,0.004549814,0.00022435345],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016923588,0.00001531905,0.0011691044,0.00005376398,0.0000012797439,0.00038568195,0.99574715,0.000016753145,0.00024972294,0.0005255752,0.00038492258,0.0014338482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020602822,0.000012011041,0.001236489,0.00009205518,0.0000017807434,0.00009338641,0.9932575,0.000040832572,0.00009522565,0.000081987855,0.0050771087,0.000009486811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7420126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8674357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25798738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041698463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055767044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5190134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402354318","doi":"10.1136/jme-2024-110402","title":"Stoking fears of AI X-Risk (while forgetting justice here and now)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Forgetting; Economic Justice; Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Computer security; Law; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.07465097264006242,"score_gpt":0.45696875641132273,"score_spread":0.3823177837712603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402354318","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04415174,0.004552106,0.0055521275,0.8311241,0.0046965475,0.000020107753,0.00002541063,0.00006873563,0.10980907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7489124,0.002150296,0.0029310014,0.22680438,0.002871067,0.000033901426,0.000016548222,0.000083143896,0.016197287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.986733,0.006975653,0.0005066066,0.0010444736,0.0028122046,0.0019280483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977229,0.010739948,0.0031117976,0.0019102499,0.0032510501,0.003758013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015629696,0.0002808454,0.0004020718,0.00067707547,0.009072798,0.008145678,0.0013613896,0.011311514,0.006748204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059385415,0.00028950817,0.0007854683,0.00038016948,0.025735382,0.008030437,0.005821193,0.024179056,0.0013203255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001489328,0.0001312635,0.008985028,0.00018027781,0.0001584813,0.0031283072,0.06448301,0.0004269473,0.0013670388,0.72019625,0.13074954,0.070045024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033818054,0.00011641682,0.0041703214,0.0010678328,0.000075220785,0.00626504,0.045341995,0.0006068664,0.0013603037,0.6183931,0.32244807,0.000121074656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047051534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048161703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015629696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002809409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005164011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08265871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405529025","doi":"10.1136/jme-2024-110392","title":"Navigating the consent river: questions to consider before waiving consent requirements in pragmatic cluster randomised trials","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"London Health Sciences Centre; Western University; Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Eli Lilly and Company","keywords":"Waiver; Informed consent; Cluster randomised controlled trial; Cluster (spacecraft); Research ethics; Intervention (counseling); Clinical trial; Research design; Psychology; Family medicine; Randomized controlled trial; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Medical education; Computer science; Political science; Law; Psychiatry; Sociology; Surgery; Pathology","score_opus":0.5627502535127855,"score_gpt":0.6459479293291469,"score_spread":0.0831976758163614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405529025","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004232615,0.015404518,0.16330162,0.7769382,0.014903006,0.018447664,0.00031944565,0.0004970082,0.005955923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05867726,0.0068646544,0.6613055,0.19193508,0.00498766,0.073519,0.00021084596,0.0005339612,0.0019660129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.07576353,0.80434036,0.08656362,0.0055821068,0.024895001,0.0028553088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.027865874,0.8964085,0.022783568,0.02478528,0.025045719,0.0031109755],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.85299695,0.0022708457,0.009914798,0.005740446,0.009609706,0.026218439,0.015080374,0.04837186,0.0065942276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.92677075,0.0051457663,0.008347522,0.008674161,0.047938295,0.052102365,0.013795721,0.059865918,0.0038965011],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026517215,0.00036551082,0.0031832037,0.027542194,0.0013349253,0.002799293,0.11502837,0.0032378356,0.0014385681,0.38230598,0.14816795,0.31194445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002391343,0.001024478,0.0023733207,0.06214983,0.0005586508,0.0021260134,0.016446855,0.0074927444,0.0016523148,0.6072308,0.29539084,0.0011628171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052951043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059197135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14700305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018133795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1051412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18128103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405740408","doi":"10.1136/jme-2024-110640","title":"Is framing of treatment options misleading? Maybe, but not because of a lower-bound reading","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Framing effect; Duty; Empirical research; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.47341711100618095,"score_gpt":0.5106760104424345,"score_spread":0.037258899436253545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405740408","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039508855,0.00975691,0.04082587,0.8843803,0.006987934,0.000032535456,0.00018930522,0.000091306785,0.05378495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43818593,0.008438432,0.027242495,0.4839266,0.028180692,0.00034886232,0.00021594277,0.00026472198,0.0131962905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9567367,0.02720781,0.0020599717,0.00402336,0.008523999,0.0014481457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8574056,0.117813714,0.007412895,0.0076131546,0.0087862685,0.00096831395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03567468,0.0013958778,0.0025717474,0.0037989537,0.004133721,0.010744849,0.004990924,0.019594952,0.010776106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14209108,0.0009707009,0.0014900168,0.0026552533,0.03866817,0.02677099,0.0056224405,0.02228656,0.0024468503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007649253,0.000019982053,0.00033596778,0.00018633486,0.00004572302,0.00024739114,0.003300665,0.00023942052,0.00008948915,0.9450317,0.037818056,0.012608889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030274929,0.000016842856,0.00023986686,0.00044566242,0.000021826645,0.00014467789,0.0008762593,0.000634361,0.00016939193,0.9611963,0.036196392,0.000028062901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033795792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001523243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03567468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00554166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022857839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18866795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406235228","doi":"10.1136/jme-2024-110373","title":"Liberalism and mitochondrial replacement technique","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Harm; Liberalism; Criticism; Narrative; Psychological intervention; Offspring; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Politics; Biology; Genetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.041932220628554076,"score_gpt":0.4191960703829565,"score_spread":0.3772638497544024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406235228","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04919528,0.021495001,0.015236788,0.5773846,0.0021618989,0.00004515665,0.000042645624,0.00007424213,0.3343644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89159524,0.0044505713,0.0036446354,0.07148705,0.0013534846,0.00010238295,0.000021700334,0.000068426576,0.027276551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896208,0.0065035108,0.0002524842,0.001151632,0.0013820303,0.0010895014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98876673,0.0076005296,0.0010624403,0.001187041,0.00074796344,0.00063524523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013655147,0.0003593493,0.0006079116,0.0007435718,0.005146472,0.007348358,0.0013035142,0.009726088,0.0029553135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015675468,0.00024209291,0.0005912968,0.00057043287,0.061849214,0.0059788763,0.0063006226,0.013370148,0.0005798493],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012190802,0.000008621258,0.00018613171,0.000013852326,0.0000037482532,0.00006570323,0.0033648284,0.00006787874,0.00007589272,0.99058247,0.0023617619,0.0032569661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025587547,0.00003031349,0.00034402384,0.00015547816,0.000007712381,0.0001712999,0.0022671884,0.00030735394,0.00034502495,0.8830573,0.113265984,0.000022750331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023460512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020042593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013655147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051147435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002815269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07221615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409263429","doi":"10.1136/jme-2025-110936","title":"Asymmetry endures: a response to Holt","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Obligation; Scope (computer science); Moral obligation; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Pregnancy; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05566496825447049,"score_gpt":0.48758576224296707,"score_spread":0.4319207939884966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409263429","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013405561,0.0020518394,0.00071339234,0.98261917,0.0027551963,0.000005543657,0.000014612961,0.000019585264,0.01048007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.067966506,0.0022850337,0.0010663122,0.90718234,0.008376425,0.00007744812,0.000018908751,0.00015156306,0.012875429],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859379,0.006738365,0.0005034119,0.0021488392,0.0030923444,0.0015792298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96837384,0.026439808,0.0010049155,0.0009168985,0.0021170103,0.0011475865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017814323,0.000752013,0.0012467911,0.0012811787,0.009895419,0.0114299925,0.0036038752,0.039213832,0.0062446194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049378537,0.0007064493,0.0012971133,0.0015976772,0.03880018,0.024140226,0.0076743523,0.056612633,0.0015793578],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036423073,0.00001856831,0.0001899296,0.000044609842,0.000007354152,0.00030048206,0.009419044,0.00011837732,0.00007017196,0.643469,0.34106427,0.0052618366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007131017,0.000033548604,0.0003450244,0.00068456586,0.000018118597,0.00048043125,0.013073852,0.0006779309,0.00042555286,0.44504917,0.53903365,0.00010694954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011199598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012160458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039213832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009260363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0078896135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09421229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410143210","doi":"10.1136/jme-2024-110518","title":"Conduit or conductor? Physician providers’ descriptions of their role as MAiD assessors in the first years after legalisation in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Autonomy; Thematic analysis; Context (archaeology); Statutory law; Focus group; Judgement; Psychology; Qualitative research; Nursing; Social psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.1542521337266334,"score_gpt":0.4316492281370595,"score_spread":0.27739709441042615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410143210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96768355,0.0026830344,0.0010667102,0.018421827,0.00020244408,0.00008281551,0.00012031053,0.000020135667,0.009719174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993778,0.00092044723,0.0004620868,0.001939174,0.000018869894,0.000027765742,0.00003238828,0.000016241833,0.0028050726],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882564,0.0058007427,0.00036265588,0.0005321687,0.0021685932,0.002879431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9705795,0.014643868,0.003132583,0.0004364636,0.0052062967,0.006001235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009383132,0.00033573864,0.0004949657,0.001017677,0.020610576,0.0056021493,0.00224461,0.0025279364,0.003010634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030451352,0.0005325462,0.00029943444,0.0014549611,0.014632037,0.0025817265,0.004625464,0.004648478,0.00017349253],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003287222,0.000011072753,0.0049629663,0.0000773349,0.0000031540073,0.0012666513,0.9869379,0.000037591195,0.00027278147,0.0018069044,0.0015745986,0.0030161266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030351937,0.000017051967,0.004143032,0.00026916654,0.000004123712,0.00044955075,0.9769816,0.000068277055,0.00012292084,0.00018440325,0.017734988,0.000021897122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8635671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9209637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13643289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.072306514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.104538806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5246229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411224477","doi":"10.1136/jme-2024-110192","title":"Physicians’ preferences for their own end of life: a comparison across North America, Europe, and Australia","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"Vrije Universiteit Brussel; Universiteit Gent","keywords":"Palliative care; End-of-life care; Family medicine; Medicine; Demographics; Physician assisted suicide; Advance care planning; Gerontology; Demography; Nursing","score_opus":0.27807470298715364,"score_gpt":0.5102665190336279,"score_spread":0.2321918160464742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411224477","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985958,0.00033040936,0.000025031164,0.00020360491,0.0000033922195,0.000005145447,0.000046561356,7.225511e-7,0.00078945444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994568,0.00021212887,0.000033465472,0.00012304129,0.0000045818697,0.0000059191198,0.000044703454,7.791507e-7,0.00011869067],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990761,0.00035736783,0.00008760173,0.00011293192,0.00021878607,0.00014713319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99588937,0.000997784,0.0018200391,0.00007285317,0.0004916091,0.0007283229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001067971,0.00011383654,0.00019641641,0.0009255939,0.0004937855,0.00059646834,0.0002086492,0.00045898557,0.0017127402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005554382,0.00013372902,0.00023152167,0.0013479866,0.00040339713,0.00067597395,0.00057052315,0.0002857655,0.00018505892],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000119883545,0.00004695285,0.9873804,0.00004166009,0.00004623858,0.00013729428,0.0054818345,0.000040853723,0.00018874454,0.000063807594,0.00037522378,0.0060770777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069288462,0.000057300418,0.99126446,0.000028200153,0.00000836603,0.00018380131,0.007880135,0.000063390165,0.000019825115,0.00001788991,0.0004658938,0.000003819906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017673448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03314719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017673448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054986007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056264986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03514111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412401888","doi":"10.1136/jme-2025-110950","title":"Do vaccine mandates impair the voluntariness of informed consent?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Western University","funders":"Institute of Population and Public Health","keywords":"Voluntariness; Coercion (linguistics); Informed consent; Obligation; Undue influence; Psychology; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Medicine; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.12847884036830975,"score_gpt":0.5697056641372943,"score_spread":0.44122682376898453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412401888","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08611478,0.012285781,0.093595564,0.51711154,0.0019700867,0.00040179671,0.00021381959,0.00019752744,0.28810915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93334883,0.0039067385,0.011752943,0.042929042,0.0010995327,0.0004091094,0.00005879117,0.00006861706,0.0064263847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92952204,0.047946915,0.0033086026,0.00514549,0.010076499,0.004000478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7896372,0.1662008,0.020133495,0.015621594,0.007045167,0.0013617674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07121418,0.00040691468,0.00092808326,0.0011775487,0.0028371462,0.0068684765,0.0023597393,0.014470052,0.0066882875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20420581,0.00079572725,0.0014016691,0.00082187634,0.02855829,0.0211684,0.004463627,0.010810348,0.0013981921],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003901118,0.000021993546,0.0013033127,0.00011420886,0.00002815742,0.00021326404,0.0040933755,0.00012666773,0.0001873385,0.9825967,0.0015429037,0.009733047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000797525,0.00007691463,0.0023900676,0.00052429386,0.000050869276,0.000629922,0.0015168147,0.0010518975,0.001096543,0.95083666,0.04169206,0.00005425562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003166488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028214734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07121418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004306986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008345974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37662107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413141007","doi":"10.1136/jme-2024-110629","title":"A large exploratory survey of electroconvulsive therapy recipients, family members and friends: what information do they recall being given?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Traffic Injury Research Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Snowball sampling; Recall; Electroconvulsive therapy; Psychology; Misinformation; Psychiatry; Representativeness heuristic; Medicine; Clinical psychology; Social psychology; Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming); Cognitive psychology; Law","score_opus":0.03448629507609149,"score_gpt":0.3540437906473304,"score_spread":0.3195574955712389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413141007","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987312,0.00010745488,0.000089037785,0.00027639008,0.0000038587127,0.00011386009,0.00018810673,0.0000035110797,0.00048659457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981622,0.00030639273,0.00017813705,0.00057011686,0.0000133792255,0.00022442504,0.00018545894,0.0000029944242,0.00035692993],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99687636,0.0018508936,0.00032028524,0.00021569416,0.00047453237,0.00026230072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921117,0.0035166764,0.0024618455,0.00037211564,0.0007647235,0.00077284843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004794029,0.00022388804,0.00037597888,0.0011163087,0.0011585878,0.0010451468,0.00033655536,0.0008085546,0.0023841667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0132174855,0.0003531109,0.00029423754,0.001072809,0.00064469496,0.0016930738,0.00086947763,0.00072378345,0.0007324189],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003149033,0.00061641407,0.9263225,0.00033752457,0.000053708038,0.0007617972,0.050589334,0.000037972673,0.0008396905,0.000111332454,0.0018842043,0.018130613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003171814,0.0011733895,0.9264456,0.0001383605,0.000026738047,0.00083942537,0.06831588,0.00019171057,0.00016847925,0.000079688,0.0025601725,0.000028902205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033123046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039262646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004794029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005488979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006701158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02535355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414188918","doi":"10.1136/jme-2025-110961","title":"Harms of the current global anti-FGM campaign","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; Université de Montréal; University of Toronto","funders":"Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd; Vetenskapsrådet","keywords":"Ethnocentrism; Human rights; Multiculturalism; Unintended consequences; Expansive; Cultural diversity; Racism; Female circumcision; Profiling (computer programming)","score_opus":0.05217243562505404,"score_gpt":0.4344294321854156,"score_spread":0.38225699656036155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414188918","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25502023,0.02882185,0.005643487,0.46098116,0.0039394996,0.000108200096,0.00013569303,0.00011756955,0.24523233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8775933,0.009838349,0.0019469855,0.09589877,0.0016107915,0.00011230422,0.000055952423,0.00009018133,0.012853336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98811764,0.0081129465,0.0002724411,0.0004984731,0.0021255831,0.0008729188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98768175,0.009001262,0.0013869148,0.0006791373,0.00064316206,0.0006077761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0125077255,0.00036932513,0.00027441463,0.0008458558,0.0040221,0.0037175312,0.00053772825,0.004434007,0.00524214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01765512,0.00018527292,0.00033985946,0.0005370892,0.010354706,0.0024491374,0.0052851257,0.005104432,0.000720162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025986106,0.00027112805,0.016982136,0.001631007,0.000115386734,0.003301509,0.15852296,0.00052396045,0.003480394,0.43667668,0.07089119,0.30734378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005125734,0.0003682147,0.020281754,0.0050220913,0.00011362701,0.0039344877,0.077851765,0.0004640726,0.0033934265,0.07669187,0.8117476,0.00007978123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014671177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024295545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0125077255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00195571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018435454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06614792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416435851","doi":"10.1136/jme-2025-111481","title":"On the death of intention and the dehumanisation of medicine: an Islamic ethical reflection","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Dehumanization; Agency (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Compassion; Islam; Medical ethics; Adjudication; Moral agency; Power (physics); Moral disengagement","score_opus":0.1025846535814129,"score_gpt":0.45800168704081357,"score_spread":0.3554170334594007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416435851","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061190534,0.0062993625,0.024424115,0.74927706,0.006487324,0.00012925814,0.000056817826,0.00005833026,0.15207718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77458334,0.0045188884,0.012333047,0.16994992,0.0030802728,0.00013548839,0.000023884897,0.00010434055,0.035270795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993349,0.0045706877,0.0002137829,0.0002823684,0.0009742653,0.0006099216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98898673,0.008093479,0.000734877,0.0005890799,0.0010437759,0.0005521142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008581087,0.00041422172,0.0005408414,0.00094896444,0.004364466,0.0073875184,0.0017077082,0.009756685,0.0027128342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017669342,0.00027722496,0.00058256375,0.000649644,0.034391027,0.007963487,0.0053731133,0.018050583,0.00066909817],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030015788,0.000062265965,0.00065319205,0.00009072233,0.000016166056,0.00061351823,0.10705502,0.00026463903,0.0003347521,0.83701617,0.039544553,0.014318979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034042456,0.000077633405,0.0009519145,0.0006714673,0.000021447735,0.00085728744,0.089670256,0.001392148,0.00083055894,0.49308845,0.4123306,0.00007427023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021261254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003708361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009756685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034111608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039814343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045381665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}