{"meta":{"query_hash":"49ca98097654","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics"},"cohort_total":323,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":323,"exported":323,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/49ca98097654","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Medical+Ethics"},"results":[{"id":"W1424801410","doi":"10.1136/jme.2005.012039","title":"Should children’s autonomy be respected by telling them of their imminent death?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Centre for Phenogenomics","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Personal autonomy; Medicine; Psychology; Internet privacy; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.14843104200357976,"score_gpt":0.4110394647063346,"score_spread":0.26260842270275486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1424801410","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022640675,0.017785775,0.00047296978,0.97622067,0.0011832414,0.00031873974,0.00012570927,0.00003201448,0.0015967891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017529469,0.05265766,0.0022165002,0.8907994,0.03514613,0.000005232369,0.0002514986,0.00012857014,0.001265559],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98649114,0.0008096348,0.0026506984,0.00040760473,0.008976973,0.0006639308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890079,0.005456459,0.0018181548,0.00062677974,0.0022982627,0.00079246727],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011981349,0.000533528,0.0018847763,0.00035207448,0.00013154745,0.000029266193,0.0010641485,0.0115092145,0.0013416238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010541021,0.00036323123,0.0007495758,0.00030930966,0.0005161522,0.00007760366,0.0001611663,0.066432916,0.00000962481],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012099034,0.00024948103,0.0007469987,0.0015496435,0.00058098213,0.0013035787,0.0041672066,0.0000018538356,0.000017209852,0.0002921637,0.9857379,0.0052319868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011205527,0.0006078643,0.000116727606,0.0030639435,0.0004885628,0.0015680288,0.0001609032,0.00005566266,0.00029697403,0.00048957864,0.991728,0.0003032048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037004545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018237719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08542131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004934564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013446877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963818892","doi":"10.1136/jme.2009.034306","title":"The cost of autonomy: estimates from recent advances in living donor kidney transplantation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hospital for Sick Children","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Autonomy; Donation; Health care; Organ donation; Public relations; Transplantation; Quality of life (healthcare); Resource (disambiguation); Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Nursing; Law; Computer science; Surgery","score_opus":0.023144789692696673,"score_gpt":0.35656722419667447,"score_spread":0.3334224345039778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963818892","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5471784,0.00512706,0.032538645,0.40675542,0.004987814,0.00053558394,0.000057119632,0.0000372821,0.002782671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91861266,0.07620677,0.0027050406,0.0021485547,0.00028444466,0.0000020456778,0.000017128461,0.000008919146,0.000014409959],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797404,0.000085760716,0.00055591704,0.00006348185,0.00122654,0.000094271054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960032,0.0031014276,0.00027050244,0.000070267364,0.00033725065,0.0002173526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028929594,0.00006474731,0.00018763148,0.000079089354,0.000051611238,0.000013179081,0.00013062923,0.00031668146,0.00039990846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070811897,0.000040520164,0.00004775742,0.00011621659,0.000155994,0.00013587206,0.000004705109,0.0021954693,0.0000024770916],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023389757,0.0012267925,0.17168146,0.0018733382,0.0002989353,0.00057038834,0.043313492,0.00012294414,0.021803446,0.017889075,0.0007060112,0.73817515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017852854,0.0011044072,0.64657426,0.016224684,0.0010329875,0.001196127,0.0030609202,0.009702309,0.046651725,0.02180011,0.23426577,0.0005338703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035417695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007534556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7376413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031524312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021106259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9538344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966069243","doi":"10.1136/jme.2008.028555","title":"“They just don’t get it!” When family disagrees with expert opinion","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"British Columbia Centre of Excellence for Women's Health; University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Credibility; Adversarial system; Humility; Power (physics); Expert opinion; Epistemology; Public relations; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Medicine; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.21527039589684208,"score_gpt":0.5474975107621235,"score_spread":0.33222711486528145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966069243","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053140293,0.0027111422,0.018982528,0.9430684,0.005020399,0.0002942279,0.0000037982643,0.000059824397,0.024545649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4132672,0.053553306,0.020181838,0.49954757,0.012427679,0.000013375601,0.00000986868,0.00007545831,0.0009236924],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9816212,0.0058998168,0.0016618804,0.00027300022,0.009860749,0.0006833755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96657753,0.028498694,0.0013116837,0.00047432914,0.0017798687,0.0013579157],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.050410055,0.00026314904,0.0006498472,0.00015057695,0.001048975,0.000031247877,0.0012024211,0.0034220421,0.0015524591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11167301,0.00016451608,0.0001405529,0.00017297674,0.00064214034,0.00045058547,0.00016045646,0.04929379,0.00011505995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014951224,0.0010625446,0.0020785136,0.0007594443,0.00025453576,0.0009468164,0.15326826,0.00001898698,0.00019821923,0.087341964,0.72262096,0.029954612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004163895,0.0017050459,0.003330263,0.008979443,0.000077813966,0.00029643858,0.053722296,0.00017803712,0.000009564191,0.062140737,0.8650039,0.00039258442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003730671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005212326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4435208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024192776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073518357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969163259","doi":"10.1136/jme.27.suppl_1.i24","title":"What triggers requests for ethics consultations?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":155,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Institutes of Health; University of Toronto; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","keywords":"Data science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.3171630085978212,"score_gpt":0.6181500892271521,"score_spread":0.3009870806293309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969163259","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003949883,0.002618482,0.06509314,0.90747404,0.0150536075,0.0005720069,0.000005686101,0.000054555712,0.005178592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16020499,0.2979082,0.03511353,0.48805025,0.012824436,0.00011566089,0.000026258329,0.00015351361,0.005603177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9773396,0.010838022,0.002353939,0.00025516184,0.008532029,0.0006812244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.58042777,0.40473607,0.0024552848,0.00048578545,0.010275891,0.0016192135],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.17548347,0.00020102566,0.00060454913,0.00020948407,0.001860907,0.000061934414,0.00092957483,0.0066949385,0.0015887988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7502769,0.00015520668,0.0002208701,0.00043102918,0.0010862333,0.00091464876,0.0001279462,0.08122019,0.00012940096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017302663,0.0007152667,0.00093437795,0.0033461472,0.00044618078,0.0012645663,0.12319077,0.000030380324,0.000105455714,0.64735615,0.19528554,0.025594912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040742815,0.00037262577,0.00009484883,0.0055050566,0.00015544174,0.0003398191,0.035619587,0.0003222381,0.000012565875,0.15910874,0.79419535,0.00019942157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008319836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004789639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5989098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002772387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020288274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977284458","doi":"10.1136/jme.2003.005553","title":"Whistleblowing in academic medicine","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Innovations in Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Data science; Computer science; Medical education; World Wide Web; Medicine; Psychology","score_opus":0.10196327754752878,"score_gpt":0.48580251086842197,"score_spread":0.3838392333208932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977284458","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37761346,0.0011352211,0.006691188,0.61058825,0.0020879586,0.00010042726,1.3698131e-7,0.000014409738,0.0017689824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95658445,0.002387171,0.0040596854,0.03418879,0.0026688455,0.0000023111436,0.0000035751386,0.000016399455,0.00008879096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99317664,0.000100037694,0.0012589098,0.00011771237,0.0051129735,0.00023374836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786913,0.00046655434,0.0003364243,0.00016356743,0.0008648782,0.00029943165],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01487208,0.00010971593,0.00042782933,0.00051084196,0.00004956864,0.000004171114,0.00031307337,0.001336543,0.00060057506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.078442015,0.00007798417,0.0000673962,0.00084067124,0.00045718826,0.00011709069,0.000034971607,0.011674474,0.000017451992],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012125088,0.0027543392,0.036555454,0.0035475118,0.00050373515,0.008635026,0.123974904,0.00043103687,0.006708383,0.36033058,0.12702298,0.32832354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.07141817,0.0058719604,0.102994986,0.08893724,0.00087389123,0.026479075,0.033608288,0.001290729,0.002379682,0.18185198,0.48309448,0.0011994969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006453302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001760874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57897097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043312734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048102695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982314288","doi":"10.1136/jme.29.3.153","title":"Do the sick have a right to cadaveric organs?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Cadaveric spasm; Scarcity; Organ donation; Relation (database); Personal autonomy; Transplantation; Organ transplantation; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Medicine; Sociology; Computer science; Surgery; Economics","score_opus":0.03914437473118005,"score_gpt":0.36366439690554153,"score_spread":0.3245200221743615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982314288","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2372818,0.0009295823,0.030200468,0.70967734,0.0021863952,0.0003629713,0.000004262479,0.000030975152,0.019326208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97586876,0.0007214564,0.0007865213,0.02169887,0.0003793996,6.6451315e-7,9.5195685e-7,0.000009961451,0.0005334326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965971,0.00019425945,0.00035994046,0.000068352,0.0026609753,0.000119367425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826735,0.0006650013,0.00011634812,0.000105019135,0.00047624827,0.00037003958],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00375815,0.00007144906,0.00017455601,0.00008312095,0.00008017164,0.000019970248,0.00013674288,0.00033514778,0.0025646067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056351023,0.00003845987,0.00007411882,0.00019896231,0.00008871364,0.00004199902,0.000006642463,0.0022483238,0.000060629252],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002533603,0.0036898179,0.03677842,0.002274436,0.0021433095,0.014929702,0.18227959,0.000163134,0.011133685,0.4660042,0.21922076,0.05884936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007103367,0.0010801897,0.018399213,0.0012838134,0.00050463405,0.009459422,0.0031181166,0.00010690121,0.013800242,0.004823689,0.9400647,0.0002556657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008790741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000422459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73858696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046604444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013081059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99834716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984551055","doi":"10.1136/jme.2003.003228","title":"Children’s understanding of the risks and benefits associated with research","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pediatric Pain Management Techniques","field":"Medicine","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"SickKids Foundation; Hospital for Sick Children; University of Toronto; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Medicine; Psychology; Family medicine","score_opus":0.28519864552026497,"score_gpt":0.44326826511460765,"score_spread":0.15806961959434268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984551055","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8765493,0.001483862,0.0021786906,0.11806898,0.00006276714,0.00023893801,0.000002257345,0.000020304456,0.0013949042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99379253,0.0040975637,0.0005967528,0.0010741717,0.00039078537,7.4903585e-7,4.567268e-7,0.000008892318,0.000038067723],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939911,0.00046140337,0.0003839612,0.000084186664,0.004890045,0.00018930134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968734,0.0019644857,0.00030603836,0.00014600389,0.0005095697,0.00020052861],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019846622,0.0000697813,0.0002467359,0.00019915143,0.000114689035,0.000012703194,0.00026415967,0.0004624907,0.000030453954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018114835,0.00003859613,0.00005763441,0.0003810973,0.0005166874,0.000059957063,0.00012385543,0.0043902774,3.2641688e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044083293,0.00087308,0.9266609,0.0003266934,0.00094690436,0.0001402942,0.0035543002,0.000048960454,0.00008354239,0.020859346,0.0332329,0.012832278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044661574,0.0013927487,0.9786838,0.0051638307,0.00046605905,0.00042052136,0.0010340357,0.0005167973,0.00036836162,0.0061109057,0.0012266365,0.00015009133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003535769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001046769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11724326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022984634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000865505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986586717","doi":"10.1136/jme.2003.006304","title":"Sex and the surgery: students’ attitudes and potential behaviour as they pass through a modern medical curriculum","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Vignette; Curriculum; Ethos; Medical education; Psychology; Subject (documents); Health care; Medical ethics; Medicine; Social psychology; Pedagogy; Computer science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.1714819570910997,"score_gpt":0.4931263735216206,"score_spread":0.3216444164305209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986586717","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5876465,0.007083059,0.0011448362,0.40219632,0.0013286679,0.0004597,0.0000052289447,0.00002939291,0.00010634103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96201843,0.020972919,0.00038470072,0.015959643,0.0005829634,0.000030969568,0.000003387939,0.000021641936,0.000025356872],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.986589,0.0042408253,0.0015600346,0.00021538617,0.0069447146,0.00045000995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884104,0.008399034,0.0009526525,0.00044634484,0.0009521949,0.0008393615],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014492638,0.00019418009,0.000655802,0.00008225445,0.0011598882,0.000043035292,0.0010456363,0.0015170011,0.0001792537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024613228,0.00011361602,0.00013876322,0.00012137666,0.0009707511,0.00021358836,0.0008730128,0.010859922,0.000011276999],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004952518,0.0011427946,0.7447361,0.001544962,0.00039391004,0.0005888255,0.19777474,0.000021409853,0.000003358822,0.04411464,0.003637461,0.005546564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.058059227,0.001396838,0.31868985,0.032242596,0.0009968656,0.005035993,0.14884983,0.0018579388,0.0000129888895,0.41913795,0.012154544,0.0015653558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037117214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012778208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42604622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015180283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062947725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001985349","doi":"10.1136/jme.2003.005199","title":"Institutional ethics review of clinical study agreements","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"De Veber; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Data science; Engineering ethics; Political science; Computer science; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.870295283781405,"score_gpt":0.7455111771351124,"score_spread":0.12478410664629258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001985349","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34182522,0.047883473,0.0014310116,0.5867071,0.015621403,0.0012823514,0.00008485958,0.000048190028,0.0051163454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7494926,0.14510076,0.00033139178,0.10312819,0.0018677111,0.0000055810974,0.0000059340973,0.00001244376,0.000055414526],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864404,0.004972465,0.0032043718,0.00023569929,0.0047385707,0.0004084464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98897934,0.005806135,0.0012379696,0.0002121866,0.002232472,0.0015319141],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07161521,0.00020438012,0.0009134806,0.00010021999,0.00031090385,0.000007709539,0.0009296304,0.003931484,0.0031022655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05646744,0.00015734017,0.00032104919,0.00037548455,0.0011437525,0.00015034754,0.00019042964,0.041776784,0.00004812846],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007019238,0.06843509,0.18353565,0.08045912,0.008422336,0.016441608,0.029975574,0.0015448215,0.00042384898,0.2321012,0.07648046,0.29516104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.021327613,0.004343122,0.013502744,0.026708126,0.0016179086,0.0011766177,0.0017881287,0.00013609418,0.00086897635,0.0076372554,0.9203143,0.0005791128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004307746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004892131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84383386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000112530455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014080581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99780905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025929190","doi":"10.1136/jme.2002.002329","title":"Genes and equality: Figure 1","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Deontic logic; Psychological intervention; Value (mathematics); Law and economics; Positive economics; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Economics; Epistemology; Psychology; Law; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.20730047864699036,"score_gpt":0.434551461039691,"score_spread":0.22725098239270064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025929190","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34726772,0.0006343609,0.03336508,0.6140937,0.0024825945,0.00015160705,0.000010096058,0.00005734422,0.0019374903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9367945,0.0043775197,0.0012132137,0.05659352,0.00081190345,0.0000018014999,5.141541e-7,0.000016188073,0.00019081653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99413115,0.00032035826,0.0007426617,0.000201024,0.0043611843,0.00024361661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963819,0.0022629744,0.00040429056,0.00016894768,0.0003563598,0.00042556864],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053552673,0.00011938105,0.00023995474,0.00015066894,0.00020785879,0.00006169602,0.0005272416,0.0006568268,0.00039076887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043530297,0.00009173501,0.00006568033,0.0003568735,0.0012223579,0.00017811568,0.00014833125,0.0049614203,0.000023719213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005743552,0.00057007966,0.00007254429,0.00032985242,0.00003250343,0.0010017882,0.0038550203,0.000023551283,0.190617,0.7767632,0.0027225853,0.023954464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0047196285,0.0011238556,0.00040189354,0.001380412,0.00007033091,0.0018612898,0.0005399056,0.00010207225,0.28635767,0.39622182,0.30671868,0.0005024274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014877937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020496833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58952683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049697588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014353021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055445824","doi":"10.1136/jme.2005.012419","title":"The challenge of Terri Schiavo: lessons for bioethics","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Anesthesia and Sedative Agents","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Lactate dehydrogenase; Arginine; Nitric oxide; Enzyme; Chemistry; Internal medicine; Biochemistry; Endocrinology; Alanine; Electron paramagnetic resonance; CCL4; Molecular biology; Biology; Amino acid; Carbon tetrachloride; Medicine","score_opus":0.20559397945478874,"score_gpt":0.46919817568224453,"score_spread":0.2636041962274558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055445824","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011499889,0.0023915002,0.005942972,0.9789608,0.0002569915,0.0001439858,0.0000025896686,0.0000057519937,0.00079552305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734677,0.01399676,0.0030849136,0.007659634,0.0013876614,0.0000028711854,0.0000018864846,0.000017004038,0.00038157662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964292,0.00018569334,0.00064996915,0.00008273347,0.0024642579,0.00018816613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99497396,0.0032470892,0.0004169731,0.00017461398,0.0008905477,0.00029683084],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009154937,0.00009419793,0.00034613055,0.000060780694,0.00014567433,0.000009337078,0.00032644524,0.00074058725,0.00009293938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0124341585,0.00004999248,0.00023262753,0.00007778613,0.0007585389,0.000053156222,0.00003271036,0.0031340418,0.0000049295136],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019850107,0.0018320186,0.0015159411,0.0012089742,0.00096597127,0.00030490194,0.018540831,0.000013915224,0.0004268415,0.6821201,0.02851997,0.26256552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049107173,0.0023618992,0.002697748,0.0017559885,0.00033743703,0.0006028462,0.003172846,0.0012434152,0.0013541079,0.008835628,0.97257596,0.00015141482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010140105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000080061945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97130114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036390287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018402617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065240875","doi":"10.1136/jme.2009.032607","title":"Evolution of hospital clinical ethics committees in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; Queen's University; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Memorial University of Newfoundland","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Ethics committee; Work (physics); Sample (material); Health care; Order (exchange); Public relations; Political science; Medicine; Medical education; Psychology; Family medicine; Public administration; Business; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.15090243509411455,"score_gpt":0.5649977494740074,"score_spread":0.41409531437989283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065240875","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5310759,0.000355444,0.0017545294,0.43933707,0.023862666,0.00021667113,0.000007714556,0.000010122419,0.0033798995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783267,0.0020044688,0.0022178101,0.015179246,0.0022085297,0.0000028413272,0.0000011553446,0.000019440748,0.000039842023],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9696101,0.014476753,0.0041074604,0.00022730422,0.0109941065,0.00058430526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.72029436,0.2687989,0.0035873908,0.0006571428,0.0051856223,0.001476619],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.17768757,0.00015827714,0.0007542673,0.00013860363,0.00041739663,0.000005209762,0.00121032,0.0060133254,0.0011596222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.67822385,0.00012390537,0.00014826044,0.00034213846,0.0012870186,0.00018861503,0.00029609498,0.19522308,0.000018317513],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002849928,0.00095572585,0.69506395,0.0015454681,0.0001282849,0.0006438048,0.01683154,0.000012339692,0.00006512215,0.22926784,0.05186956,0.0033313658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010592314,0.0017136154,0.44895506,0.01019605,0.00026186954,0.00015334133,0.074503,0.0018150905,0.0000390437,0.16299751,0.2879827,0.0007903986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5686899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95950586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50053626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006059647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12454915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070784613","doi":"10.1136/jme.2003.002931","title":"An antidote to the emerging two tier organ donation policy in Canada: the Public Cadaveric Organ Donation Program","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto General Hospital; University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Organ donation; Donation; Organ procurement; Procurement; Cadaveric spasm; Medicine; Political science; Public relations; Business; Law; Transplantation; Surgery; Marketing","score_opus":0.030314790048867453,"score_gpt":0.37789641429892035,"score_spread":0.3475816242500529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070784613","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2832417,0.0001142227,0.00238835,0.71345145,0.00033921545,0.0002610647,0.0000033416356,0.000015726093,0.00018493905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97654617,0.0006104082,0.0008490513,0.020569704,0.0013559555,0.0000042498154,0.000019215322,0.000016432346,0.000028817569],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952843,0.00032379793,0.00060092047,0.00011953129,0.003432048,0.00023935775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981949,0.0003427891,0.00023698527,0.00016137653,0.0007052635,0.00035873937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044035376,0.000114104005,0.00018920012,0.00028987782,0.00017038849,0.000059097958,0.0003352856,0.00020479328,0.0002897381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031055317,0.00006498941,0.00004380326,0.0010225966,0.00007053821,0.0002394705,0.00001852841,0.0022003255,0.000009529419],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030143352,0.00096072897,0.038187515,0.00020302543,0.0002180247,0.00034222825,0.028240448,0.0010549731,0.0018199355,0.022147344,0.007129522,0.8993948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008154309,0.0007189462,0.48782906,0.00066632434,0.00022770908,0.0020378632,0.0049578426,0.021804893,0.0029148457,0.00052828377,0.46973762,0.0004222907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06494074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77251256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8989725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069462537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010365053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072563064","doi":"10.1136/jme.29.1.44","title":"Knowledge of the legislation governing proxy consent to treatment and research","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Health and Social Services Centre University Institute of Geriatrics of Sherbrooke; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Alzheimer Society; Université de Sherbrooke","keywords":"Legislation; Respondent; Guardian; Informed consent; Proxy (statistics); Legal guardian; Research ethics; Psychology; Family medicine; Medicine; Medical education; Law; Political science; Alternative medicine; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.34248034330019067,"score_gpt":0.5739822247082923,"score_spread":0.23150188140810163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072563064","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91859555,0.0018109631,0.0005954889,0.06525412,0.001613327,0.00020505616,0.0000027627925,0.0000031336954,0.011919621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99819255,0.0003980412,0.00020473158,0.00032410526,0.00019172466,0.0000019303977,7.908716e-8,0.000005535141,0.0006812974],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99557185,0.0021928223,0.00045245996,0.00009796864,0.0015011302,0.00018375191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99264014,0.006114149,0.0001731068,0.00016015013,0.0006198327,0.00029262417],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015080419,0.000056347475,0.00017110261,0.0000916568,0.00012658685,0.000011293703,0.00016755474,0.00047261026,0.00017242228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029053526,0.000029775354,0.00005657776,0.00020455018,0.0002535808,0.00001390664,0.000031569904,0.0021029457,0.000017349508],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050274684,0.0019657505,0.009757214,0.00029848123,0.0003786207,0.0010529864,0.2748476,0.000029574396,0.00044022637,0.07648472,0.0138310995,0.620411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002327905,0.002121242,0.02245982,0.0026435922,0.0000329429,0.0026530323,0.014661452,0.000056904646,0.00019936492,0.005762669,0.9469623,0.0001187566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001393815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017919378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9331312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009963273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028325017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97912514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077806898","doi":"10.1136/jme.28.2.99","title":"Thomson, the right to life, and partial birth abortion or two MULES for Sister Sarah","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Sister; Right to life; Medicine; Obstetrics; Pregnancy; Law; Human rights; Biology; Political science; Genetics","score_opus":0.12961886363275307,"score_gpt":0.43027385795057105,"score_spread":0.30065499431781795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077806898","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23370013,0.0031173157,0.0077107293,0.7541766,0.00066559983,0.00040023206,0.0000032693326,0.00003089316,0.00019520761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96547496,0.0051038563,0.0031874666,0.023512965,0.0022733114,0.000015230544,5.2628593e-7,0.000013271861,0.00041843878],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779445,0.00010111202,0.0004990284,0.00014049416,0.0012531207,0.00021179912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975621,0.0011453364,0.00020705034,0.00018659566,0.0004779417,0.0004209515],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040176525,0.00009085221,0.00029327653,0.000086436,0.00014679338,0.000019309908,0.0001489108,0.00038852653,0.00019245634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035433434,0.00004107581,0.000072142706,0.0001455073,0.0002900576,0.000054879372,0.000039613602,0.0018090219,0.0000060284933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009000632,0.0017060256,0.017023686,0.0034779785,0.0007263175,0.0011150697,0.012638631,0.000025369714,0.0011216408,0.05367537,0.26671082,0.63277847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037239746,0.0024236669,0.006187618,0.00057434314,0.00012440374,0.0010785066,0.0006067477,0.0009845267,0.0013322104,0.0027220903,0.98012096,0.00012096625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007958771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000314256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7317748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002597979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004635555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97269154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084044584","doi":"10.1136/jme.2008.024752","title":"Propranolol, post-traumatic stress disorder and narrative identity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Empathy and Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Neuroethics; Narrative; Bioethics; Propranolol; Identity (music); Traumatic stress; Psychotherapist; Medicine; Quality of life (healthcare); Psychiatry; Psychology; Traumatic memories; Narrative therapy; Law; Political science; Neuroscience; Anesthesia; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.05838502864932424,"score_gpt":0.3994187541323381,"score_spread":0.3410337254830139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084044584","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9067761,0.0017668993,0.0008424199,0.08980558,0.00052321353,0.00011242945,0.000001320833,0.0000093951785,0.00016268638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98884344,0.005731411,0.0006075014,0.004125976,0.00051723997,0.0000021201809,0.0000037151585,0.000008510761,0.00016010017],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99592924,0.00018271746,0.00053060736,0.00010299014,0.0030925653,0.00016187994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974938,0.0006005075,0.00024966977,0.0001069522,0.00088919105,0.00065990014],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028332951,0.00010066588,0.00034428333,0.00009896638,0.00017378686,0.000010890567,0.00014055494,0.0006412665,0.00043564988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023621518,0.000066058696,0.000085737935,0.0001474664,0.0006174015,0.00024092023,0.000035007513,0.0035279978,0.000005752205],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039783755,0.0022846845,0.011495397,0.0015579816,0.00026570458,0.0015220823,0.9614499,0.0000016761346,0.00017589277,0.002264524,0.0024065564,0.01617775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011450196,0.005945475,0.24705395,0.008207732,0.00060142775,0.022699168,0.6905268,0.0004024345,0.0005996247,0.003224858,0.008814147,0.00047417718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015057718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021858583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2709231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003749922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030130497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088724213","doi":"10.1136/jme.2006.016550","title":"Violating ethics: unlawful combatants, national security and health professionals","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Institute of Gender and Health; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Torture; Complicity; Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Refugee; Health care; Power (physics); Medicine; Amnesty; Criminology; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.44557519086646713,"score_gpt":0.6112288877725712,"score_spread":0.1656536969061041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088724213","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[9.0385606e-7,0.90396386,0.00020732914,0.089017116,0.002582537,0.00028992034,0.000027158105,0.000021940212,0.0038892424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00005811953,0.97700316,0.0004965378,0.017659632,0.0045949807,0.0000024895687,0.000014640348,0.000027447975,0.00014302136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9743223,0.006434427,0.0024267323,0.0003385956,0.0158542,0.00062372856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96905917,0.024197666,0.002874224,0.00015222261,0.0023826011,0.0013340965],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.18211794,0.00033382728,0.0018400789,0.0002740778,0.0015042385,0.00012993847,0.0009970323,0.008058459,0.0003288669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07698622,0.00024480475,0.00044575534,0.00042826703,0.0016875013,0.00022231234,0.00019416286,0.03836315,0.000007695059],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000083211335,0.0002279884,0.0000124246935,0.018542407,0.00019818693,0.00010671045,0.054487117,9.319263e-8,4.374879e-9,0.5122645,0.010874606,0.40327764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022621926,0.000073363204,0.0000029753714,0.04612495,0.000083437466,0.00011475491,0.0027000608,0.000002738291,1.7741396e-8,0.024693865,0.92576414,0.00021345732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065628777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049481913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9148896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005550019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.073724896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095775042","doi":"10.1136/jme.2006.020115","title":"International migration of doctors from developing countries: need to follow the Commonwealth Code","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Global Health Workforce Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Developing country; Economic shortage; Developed country; Political science; Code (set theory); Economic growth; Medicine; Public relations; Law; Computer science; Economics; Environmental health; Government (linguistics); Population","score_opus":0.1608342796798747,"score_gpt":0.5040718796968885,"score_spread":0.34323760001701376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095775042","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51547146,0.00034515042,0.005948653,0.47382104,0.0033115365,0.00023945584,0.000028358938,0.000014517662,0.00081982306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89471424,0.015531427,0.006577014,0.080729775,0.0021482029,0.000010068138,0.00001752677,0.00002119983,0.00025051797],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99289316,0.0010164205,0.001646389,0.00011111068,0.0040057055,0.00032723052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98915976,0.0073885107,0.0010558143,0.00018993951,0.0017810075,0.00042497815],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077684806,0.00012134487,0.00041584694,0.00011101193,0.00062054023,0.000007206522,0.0008238282,0.00080156344,0.00069323025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011334216,0.00007713522,0.00008938022,0.00026867265,0.00021212235,0.00011058682,0.0001448838,0.0039618677,0.000042799424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012303113,0.00018260376,0.25204998,0.00056073273,0.00031043883,0.00016451137,0.22239351,0.00015639514,0.000039562852,0.040099107,0.48032242,0.0024903945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001200211,0.0001442886,0.02026782,0.003331917,0.00002158356,0.00002698213,0.00900665,0.00025117313,0.000033435263,0.0011539231,0.9644686,0.00009339807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039064935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006836978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48414618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040468754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006611599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096345448","doi":"10.1136/jme.2006.016204","title":"Wickedness or folly? The ethics of NICE’s decisions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Healthcare cost, quality, practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Institute for Work & Health","funders":"","keywords":"Wickedness; Rebuttal; Nice; Excellence; Morality; Sociology; Medical ethics; Concreteness; Law; Environmental ethics; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.9213234238112872,"score_gpt":0.7270694886599182,"score_spread":0.19425393515136902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096345448","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000010165688,0.8111723,0.0014826321,0.17819752,0.007107254,0.0009437757,0.00006848387,0.000023632081,0.0009942049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000015997435,0.97395515,0.0011154421,0.019509431,0.0041726446,0.000041616764,0.000017103876,0.000103017795,0.0010695924],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.912179,0.06082019,0.009579987,0.00047608587,0.015872039,0.0010726845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5821182,0.3947798,0.013642563,0.0014856242,0.0065789395,0.0013948724],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20555945,0.0006153371,0.004343637,0.00045827008,0.0015506138,0.000035876317,0.0037380597,0.015196399,0.0013723876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5178372,0.00029758818,0.0012551282,0.0012496305,0.0013527712,0.00026024037,0.0008237205,0.11003225,0.00017383037],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017025399,0.00050568685,0.00004116058,0.11012241,0.00064174295,0.00057223754,0.013399937,0.0000010272499,4.375431e-8,0.019032668,0.09041994,0.7650929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005554321,0.00021038938,0.000017146733,0.14004408,0.0011197369,0.00031882536,0.0027814703,0.0000030526826,4.0512536e-8,0.0018616138,0.85285246,0.00023576205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014535605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058952435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7648571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006115952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14861897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096475618","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2012-100695","title":"Deliberate use of placebos in clinical practice: what we really know","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pain Management and Placebo Effect","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital; Jewish General Hospital; McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Popularity; Alternative medicine; Pill; Medicine; Interpretation (philosophy); Clinical Practice; Value (mathematics); Placebo; Clinical trial; Psychiatry; Family medicine; Psychology; Psychotherapist; Social psychology; Pharmacology; Pathology; Computer science","score_opus":0.22449442378451723,"score_gpt":0.4719536467805867,"score_spread":0.24745922299606948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096475618","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42247525,0.009864956,0.030619457,0.5122504,0.017244294,0.0012040525,0.000007362819,0.00007503947,0.0062591685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76501954,0.19455253,0.0048994427,0.033300053,0.0016901274,0.000003617959,8.500025e-7,0.0000332283,0.00050062063],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834077,0.010749808,0.0014375909,0.00016422353,0.0038585563,0.00038213652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9066298,0.09135156,0.0010161528,0.00022395935,0.00027703293,0.00050149503],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1014659,0.00012941215,0.00040804033,0.00018296507,0.000049000853,0.000100702906,0.0005132274,0.00078494684,0.00015687828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.34378842,0.00009643602,0.00016179145,0.00032295843,0.0003052248,0.0021862583,0.00014397736,0.005317775,0.000034310528],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0062407437,0.0059290966,0.026923608,0.0013078433,0.00025023142,0.0037351379,0.014337851,0.0004987714,0.0059207873,0.03871938,0.11270834,0.7834282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037776476,0.00075931,0.0038388204,0.0036022635,0.00016136652,0.00048623598,0.000917806,0.00772116,0.0021733495,0.001093178,0.9751245,0.0003443589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014447111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021637465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86241615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003791608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075041456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097055790","doi":"10.1136/jme.27.suppl_1.i41","title":"Teaching old dogs new tricks—a personal perspective on a decade of efforts by a clinical ethics committee to promote awareness of medical ethics","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medical ethics; Medical education; Perspective (graphical); Health care; Formative assessment; Military medical ethics; Health professionals; Nursing ethics; Engineering ethics; Institution; Medicine; Psychology; Political science; Law; Pedagogy; Engineering","score_opus":0.24471901472290208,"score_gpt":0.6018820741024096,"score_spread":0.3571630593795075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097055790","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.112868786,0.0009484488,0.03984742,0.8373629,0.0045443242,0.00081423216,0.000030546555,0.00006025714,0.0035231106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7201358,0.02191369,0.011059397,0.23636295,0.008684614,0.000028532831,0.000015063427,0.00021416887,0.0015858005],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.90278345,0.043002002,0.0076876506,0.0009970972,0.043991685,0.0015380934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5884101,0.3879939,0.006247816,0.0012554402,0.009425788,0.0066669877],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.34056634,0.0006001082,0.0024081909,0.00056003704,0.0016269254,0.000031140564,0.003239141,0.019863684,0.0018881866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.81103325,0.00046496786,0.00077527354,0.0009822173,0.0025428184,0.0003164558,0.0010042145,0.2471018,0.000057113608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0051672626,0.006055814,0.017613305,0.0054066954,0.0013638758,0.0018701651,0.491856,0.000016911892,0.00012287324,0.2893202,0.15718852,0.02401838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.024543356,0.010540554,0.0034997072,0.07247322,0.001433805,0.0014623478,0.11363406,0.002600106,0.00015465684,0.11173468,0.6561422,0.0017813481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009979005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031854957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.607267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076974166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06336075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098333298","doi":"10.1136/jme.28.2.68","title":"Are doctors altruistic?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficence; Gratitude; Fiduciary; Obligation; Altruism (biology); Duty; Psychology; Best interests; Social psychology; Law; Medicine; Political science; Autonomy","score_opus":0.10927620748165554,"score_gpt":0.3837161964824324,"score_spread":0.2744399890007768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098333298","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34400412,0.002027294,0.0073417053,0.628825,0.0030947626,0.00014869701,0.0000067299943,0.000054634034,0.014497012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857614,0.002313368,0.00040317277,0.010403927,0.0006921772,1.8406975e-7,0.0000010556691,0.0000065834543,0.0004181201],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969587,0.000067630055,0.00035417703,0.00004873199,0.0024850464,0.00008574352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983837,0.00046869012,0.00034678882,0.0000580438,0.00041745102,0.00032532532],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014494509,0.000053275668,0.0001728869,0.00009287983,0.00003705082,0.000009473984,0.00008286074,0.00039751988,0.0048427214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008883889,0.00003783594,0.00007500177,0.00010690455,0.000085163585,0.000041014475,0.000004894874,0.0020795073,0.000062176434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014663232,0.006357498,0.29937044,0.006392046,0.0018245594,0.038755897,0.04426034,0.000043219294,0.0017254421,0.09249067,0.36615935,0.14115421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.019543607,0.0015607487,0.39368972,0.0059219254,0.001058645,0.016683036,0.0022833191,0.0029918002,0.0025349401,0.0033600796,0.5498772,0.00049497234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000029511505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000992548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6417573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029560097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020122906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098647282","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2011-100153","title":"A survey of the perspectives of patients who are seriously ill regarding end-of-life decisions in some medical institutions of Korea, China and Japan","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ewha Womans University","keywords":"China; Socioeconomic status; Spouse; End-of-life care; Quarter (Canadian coin); Medicine; Family medicine; Psychology; Palliative care; Nursing; Political science; Environmental health; Geography; Law; Population","score_opus":0.1785516584684406,"score_gpt":0.4470032929594813,"score_spread":0.2684516344910407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098647282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9858586,0.008239895,0.00020580424,0.005016671,0.00030468623,0.00011401196,0.0000625245,0.0000018406363,0.00019592264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985131,0.014152404,0.00030752431,0.00026022753,0.00012981622,8.15375e-7,0.0000036261376,0.000008808941,0.0000057321085],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99426305,0.00060143287,0.0013112791,0.00010760277,0.0035180906,0.00019854051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99255335,0.0036990307,0.0012084122,0.00022993056,0.0018095175,0.00049973256],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066225156,0.00013434986,0.0010226514,0.0002508192,0.000045723496,0.0000020683865,0.00032896618,0.00059672014,0.000074399475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14766328,0.00008160414,0.00020003848,0.0004165146,0.0015549822,0.00014278162,0.0001635447,0.0019752737,1.6973505e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029799648,0.0007864356,0.9528071,0.00032986642,0.00020567518,0.0000074046116,0.04101781,0.00000601714,0.00006286779,0.001930548,0.00026671588,0.002281552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028659452,0.0003644708,0.9730572,0.011790881,0.00011103,0.00001734534,0.010492794,0.000057174224,0.00044368222,0.00018564342,0.0005425978,0.00007124966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086868485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00078871904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14104076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006469188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002641623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8595163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098682384","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2012-101260","title":"Depictions of ‘brain death’ in the media: medical and ethical implications","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal; Montreal Clinical Research Institute","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Newspaper; Organ donation; Confusion; Meaning (existential); Psychology; Medicine; Law; Transplantation; Political science; Psychoanalysis; Surgery","score_opus":0.0594112280284292,"score_gpt":0.3977646414534941,"score_spread":0.3383534134250649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098682384","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22297288,0.000196061,0.003949553,0.7720512,0.00011945403,0.000116339084,0.0000022136146,0.0000053681397,0.000586924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97361773,0.0028395613,0.0005804546,0.022706613,0.00023155393,0.0000054037196,0.000004956029,0.000005696625,0.000008025371],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99592054,0.00035328508,0.00067060575,0.000078366305,0.0028634574,0.00011377187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925306,0.006278439,0.0001797618,0.000120135366,0.00052107056,0.0003700013],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006421712,0.00006949269,0.00023476813,0.00015727463,0.000055171327,0.00001198623,0.00020095134,0.001128697,0.000775979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017352827,0.000041308136,0.00006711627,0.0002373215,0.00032312225,0.00005283277,0.000017151546,0.005188353,0.000006396836],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028586344,0.0021228616,0.16013394,0.0014937479,0.0004139361,0.0009102872,0.05913078,0.000007633391,0.0022320803,0.6904984,0.027523352,0.055247113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037324845,0.0003086706,0.9652836,0.00087707845,0.00014441802,0.0052281567,0.0016700925,0.00047981765,0.00015000672,0.01794988,0.004084957,0.00009088003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008221201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023752415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8051496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002043978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012422821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99710673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099164461","doi":"10.1136/jme.2009.029371","title":"Transparency, accountability and vaccination policy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Appeal; Freedom of information; Confidentiality; Accountability; Duty; Political science; Presumption; Legislation; Medicine; Democracy; Law; Rubella; Vaccination; Law and economics; Measles; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03974200818870436,"score_gpt":0.4295755049153333,"score_spread":0.3898334967266289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099164461","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00076665304,0.0051950295,0.0006507496,0.1951021,0.7914707,0.0001756311,0.000023040275,0.000028083554,0.006588003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011251907,0.07052995,0.00008299658,0.00091311894,0.91697246,7.2172907e-7,0.000006087214,0.000010678988,0.000232105],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893478,0.0008059184,0.0008002043,0.00017725403,0.008587825,0.00028098907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99095464,0.0057417075,0.00065048406,0.00014132676,0.0019947062,0.0005171466],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.019773751,0.00016541028,0.0005354176,0.00020306732,0.00034563773,0.0001333803,0.0007080638,0.0051617716,0.0005098639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08182477,0.00013783955,0.00017200214,0.00025032656,0.000065500746,0.00031925898,0.000030674815,0.008512573,0.000003571939],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038481423,0.00008204307,0.0000785661,0.00015665739,0.000027140208,0.00004119801,0.015870625,2.7075498e-7,3.2865267e-7,0.002926287,0.9551846,0.025593838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061200385,0.00016282096,0.00089730596,0.00043101754,0.00007197862,0.0000054376264,0.0006787682,0.0000016394546,7.2374627e-7,0.014741618,0.9822612,0.00013553063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020508927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0088173915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19418897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037502986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023961097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99612975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102710982","doi":"10.1136/jme.29.6.337","title":"Absent virtues: the poacher becomes gamekeeper","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Pembroke College, University of Cambridge; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Paternalism; Bioethics; Elitism; Accountability; Medical ethics; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Field (mathematics); Political science; Environmental ethics; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.19924716142092325,"score_gpt":0.5620562782201366,"score_spread":0.36280911679921335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102710982","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011229039,0.0046595917,0.021183847,0.7977893,0.01240393,0.00040370665,0.000001632372,0.0000471972,0.1522818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7400093,0.014320591,0.004566617,0.23438938,0.0032486992,0.00001713808,7.928186e-7,0.000063297826,0.0033841864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9749578,0.015484686,0.0015748215,0.00016705808,0.0072860504,0.00052955287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90902674,0.08605693,0.0013964724,0.00055234844,0.0019423033,0.00102521],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12168378,0.00016482428,0.000408712,0.000083973195,0.0010558746,0.000015440824,0.001007072,0.0023214328,0.012035699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.38457915,0.000089303896,0.00019239353,0.0002485786,0.0009718365,0.00017086211,0.00015193151,0.06365142,0.0004213124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114544164,0.00043689559,0.004399635,0.00045125122,0.00028862615,0.0004600899,0.045353338,0.000004875455,0.000021971106,0.83949226,0.1052585,0.0037180088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013377427,0.00016353767,0.0011934118,0.0011085116,0.000120833705,0.0002667257,0.027235158,0.000027199529,0.000020161064,0.17736982,0.79100627,0.0001506641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001054744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017430795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72878027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014457597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007366272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102981370","doi":"10.1136/jme.2010.040097","title":"Assessment of children's capacity to consent for research: a descriptive qualitative study of researchers' practices: Table 1","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital; Hospital for Sick Children; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Qualitative research; Psychology; Legislation; Focus group; Research ethics; Medical education; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Medicine; Law; Sociology; Alternative medicine; Social science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.9642022526376816,"score_gpt":0.7600601891132074,"score_spread":0.20414206352447417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102981370","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96025276,0.00015841554,0.004054076,0.030212916,0.00024145967,0.0020298315,0.000036560476,0.000006374635,0.0030076222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9684617,0.0010169826,0.029493209,0.00050141534,0.00022673169,0.000039983428,0.0000012402345,0.00002577993,0.00023296021],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9562974,0.010631357,0.002913821,0.0005102352,0.028796,0.00085117563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5331737,0.4006495,0.0037655684,0.0013773247,0.057740644,0.0032933117],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.29727516,0.00016297484,0.0010450069,0.0006412311,0.00016609086,0.000021058018,0.0010890238,0.0014871015,0.0003636576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7888455,0.00011799337,0.00022652048,0.0009605084,0.0023719084,0.00015647693,0.0005004812,0.02353691,0.0000031396612],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009062709,0.022223689,0.016519876,0.0040141456,0.002681393,0.0002904426,0.83105487,0.0000045505985,0.0018839068,0.10672725,0.005010455,0.0005266997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013168957,0.07106467,0.028322939,0.008536491,0.0004195709,0.00013399874,0.79987514,0.00010594753,0.003775348,0.073833615,0.00050931313,0.00025400094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005028288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003556472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49157035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037181322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02889455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103054986","doi":"10.1136/jme.2010.038877","title":"The right to die in the minimally conscious state","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Traumatic Brain Injury Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Minimally conscious state; Right to die; Value of life; Consciousness; Terminally ill; State (computer science); Quality of life (healthcare); Value (mathematics); Psychology; Resuscitation Orders; Medicine; Law; Psychotherapist; Psychiatry; Palliative care; Political science; Computer science; Nursing; Surgery; Neuroscience; Economics","score_opus":0.08295027210208605,"score_gpt":0.44070309980054095,"score_spread":0.3577528276984549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103054986","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44576332,0.00016579377,0.00011746527,0.5511255,0.00059384503,0.00018499594,0.0000015145062,0.0000043989203,0.0020431338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749186,0.0007009295,0.0012513677,0.021936387,0.00077259116,0.0000068745376,3.928383e-7,0.000014099348,0.00039873747],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925688,0.00053129776,0.0007064301,0.00009522642,0.0057568224,0.0003414253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98468924,0.013523007,0.00017284715,0.00036763705,0.0006736061,0.0005736878],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03213611,0.0000926992,0.00026421255,0.00010904605,0.0001567462,0.000066117864,0.0009094256,0.00042151945,0.00031789782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055101957,0.000038338876,0.000099654,0.00022048692,0.0007125996,0.000039229508,0.00008071404,0.011551838,0.000047874662],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0054355543,0.0025102096,0.010512656,0.0008434855,0.00073907536,0.024491739,0.11246875,0.000007193694,0.0101849865,0.042515963,0.40298045,0.38730994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0050047114,0.0022196996,0.050643533,0.0010557482,0.00007764688,0.005434682,0.003417969,0.00026062026,0.0007363733,0.015525167,0.915434,0.00018984993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003936167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023838265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52918917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035524587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031942744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103405093","doi":"10.1136/jme.2003.007641","title":"Clinical bioethics integration, sustainability, and accountability: the Hub and Spokes Strategy: Figure 1","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Choroid plexus; Tropism; Biology; Cerebrospinal fluid; Viral entry; Cell biology; Medicine; Immunology; Pathology; Neuroscience; Virus; Central nervous system; Viral replication","score_opus":0.163091092921658,"score_gpt":0.519067002950142,"score_spread":0.35597591002848394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103405093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6673418,0.002740447,0.0006348112,0.32863992,0.00014725988,0.00020043648,0.0000016577012,0.0000116104575,0.00028204045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9028447,0.0015757077,0.00024813664,0.09394974,0.0013446133,0.0000025531663,4.98791e-7,0.000011630013,0.000022397804],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946373,0.0007301854,0.0010057663,0.00023301113,0.0031162119,0.0002775029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98922366,0.007298422,0.0002618051,0.0003301907,0.002601174,0.00028477004],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.030749388,0.00015600456,0.00046877048,0.00010165332,0.00018668275,0.00011387094,0.00032475393,0.0014093686,0.00005497579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05354901,0.00008409321,0.00014701372,0.00022195377,0.003072153,0.00018533216,0.00015925177,0.009965715,0.0000035877247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018350784,0.0013810822,0.29220033,0.001569065,0.00038505078,0.0004953889,0.011476062,0.0000027791527,0.00022213739,0.03402183,0.005861259,0.65054995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009223012,0.0046995194,0.103291675,0.0017741871,0.0005962334,0.003403544,0.041619625,0.0072708917,0.00143316,0.0743696,0.7517916,0.00052695815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020488875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079092704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7459303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012449824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006797661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104253362","doi":"10.1136/jme.2003.005835","title":"How physicians face ethical difficulties: a qualitative analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":145,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ethical dilemma; Grounded theory; Dilemma; Psychology; Reputation; Qualitative research; Medical ethics; Ethical code; Ethical decision; Medical education; Medicine; Social psychology; Public relations; Sociology; Psychiatry; Political science","score_opus":0.18231891315246754,"score_gpt":0.5998661711290435,"score_spread":0.417547257976576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104253362","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007619132,0.00054942165,0.19223493,0.79558754,0.0011227533,0.00015960955,0.0000107762,0.000042356845,0.0026734879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8557753,0.0031784836,0.011657434,0.12268432,0.0044565243,0.000012062617,0.0000066295734,0.000034538316,0.002194687],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9597136,0.024938079,0.0018198311,0.00031012352,0.012504166,0.00071421993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8662945,0.12715995,0.0019418923,0.00041311508,0.0032084004,0.0009821234],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10638642,0.00026377017,0.0010804576,0.00034008993,0.0011517843,0.00004969172,0.001190736,0.0071238372,0.0012553118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.41925097,0.00018873987,0.0005612637,0.0011519222,0.0014417084,0.00038355155,0.00026250677,0.11719603,0.00013423822],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002694544,0.0006546058,0.00023624302,0.00066564744,0.0025416457,0.00020396107,0.7331375,0.00018911921,0.000095952164,0.18679164,0.06674756,0.0084666945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025112056,0.00033146067,0.00044346595,0.0016898824,0.0015805517,0.000032849417,0.48890382,0.0022672066,0.000026590964,0.015561299,0.48626882,0.00038286368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000894194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011586949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8481562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036868153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004630643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105125967","doi":"10.1136/jme.2005.015057","title":"Factors influencing the effectiveness of research ethics committees","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Research ethics; Ethics committee; Institutional review board; Mandate; Human research; Institution; Workload; Corporate governance; Institutional research; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Public administration; Law; Management","score_opus":0.7297258863336424,"score_gpt":0.6914625287378725,"score_spread":0.03826335759576993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105125967","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9212509,0.0009857077,0.0019743897,0.07177399,0.0007839619,0.00029648122,0.0000018542642,0.000013355765,0.0029194017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930988,0.0037590277,0.00039230197,0.0019642154,0.0006784386,0.0000012120322,6.8025184e-7,0.000025420262,0.00007990647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.93461794,0.011946522,0.0027554813,0.00035342746,0.049302954,0.0010236896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.096651904,0.8833835,0.0006227629,0.00080507604,0.017344978,0.001191751],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.59436166,0.00016532875,0.0007479057,0.0004415766,0.0003827924,0.0000347846,0.0014464022,0.0052267914,0.00017168463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.83954424,0.00008749349,0.0003584179,0.0010254381,0.00477091,0.00009013353,0.00050358655,0.1032129,0.000007699098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008604267,0.0025435132,0.35287285,0.027843056,0.0015272099,0.0026499499,0.06389916,0.000040530558,0.011751739,0.52135813,0.0015235805,0.0053860173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0056592203,0.0055903103,0.5755611,0.040523276,0.00024508074,0.0005416724,0.031164454,0.0000534192,0.04685258,0.28591892,0.0075593744,0.0003305674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038418116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008220006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.871437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027626436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018533561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99793756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106262720","doi":"10.1136/jme.2007.022129","title":"The stem cell debate continues: the buying and selling of eggs for research","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Commodification; Payment; Stem cell; Voluntariness; Coercion (linguistics); Research ethics; Bandwagon effect; Business; Law; Economics; Political science; Biotechnology; Biology; Finance; Market economy","score_opus":0.2759263732598337,"score_gpt":0.5351369057904886,"score_spread":0.25921053253065485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106262720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73552996,0.021612238,0.008500947,0.23272142,0.00046101207,0.00043798244,7.286888e-7,0.000012446052,0.000723285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803738,0.017141698,0.0010296316,0.0006552788,0.00053077214,0.0000022822364,1.0615642e-7,0.00000846148,0.00025798604],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99670875,0.00018898156,0.00058481697,0.00009546752,0.0021202248,0.00030177002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837934,0.013803122,0.00030658394,0.00020419936,0.0017006882,0.00019201117],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06301839,0.000056204914,0.00022495577,0.000088038934,0.0003242285,0.000014886081,0.00025512755,0.00042546817,0.0000025012625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020477718,0.000024505274,0.00006238836,0.00017479248,0.0009281157,0.000027668215,0.000057928028,0.0042808475,4.1792424e-7],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0044999234,0.00042728573,0.009820807,0.0053359503,0.00033332664,0.00041191498,0.022510534,0.000006707235,0.00926692,0.060318317,0.013693863,0.87337446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007035503,0.0052671493,0.005772371,0.0045378585,0.0002313178,0.0017913096,0.085714735,0.0008079021,0.10513458,0.042868342,0.74061996,0.00021897384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017773797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017648244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8731555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030685496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009599842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106308928","doi":"10.1136/jme.2010.037937","title":"How is informed consent related to emotions and empathy? An exploratory neuroethical investigation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Empathy; Informed consent; Psychology; Exploratory research; Social psychology; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.5544026964243888,"score_gpt":0.4955115486018369,"score_spread":0.05889114782255189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106308928","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6041687,0.0005039392,0.00029605624,0.3927379,0.0014400004,0.00043893335,0.000009088056,0.000052074098,0.00035333072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94027686,0.0019030322,0.0037787354,0.05371735,0.00016896427,0.0000267081,0.000006732499,0.000022907967,0.00009871542],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99233866,0.0036456857,0.001318262,0.00017057179,0.002194998,0.0003318507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989551,0.005339493,0.0008532204,0.00049462233,0.002014579,0.0017471052],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004114369,0.00014717915,0.00032663412,0.00025092668,0.00070462946,0.00002092036,0.00055459305,0.0015885767,0.00023115826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052955754,0.000121636476,0.000058746282,0.00031465013,0.0004948922,0.0004942973,0.00027861935,0.01016292,0.000033397202],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011969626,0.00012348678,0.018328322,0.0007530304,0.00003945915,0.000041282794,0.95189726,7.162836e-7,0.000051701933,0.0168117,0.01005987,0.0017734525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0067405915,0.0040243864,0.1278929,0.011143244,0.00018124192,0.00038179936,0.721241,0.0010383395,0.00019616407,0.074116014,0.05218696,0.0008573761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013166267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010038939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33902055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015135585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010878219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106606850","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2011-100273","title":"Individual genetic and genomic research results and the tradition of informed consent: exploring US review board guidance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Center for Research Resources; National Human Genome Research Institute","keywords":"Informed consent; Readability; Institutional review board; Psychology; Public relations; Medical education; Political science; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Computer science; Pathology","score_opus":0.82099564858497,"score_gpt":0.6237045488606142,"score_spread":0.19729109972435577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106606850","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66419464,0.11853847,0.000064591186,0.21532549,0.00037080274,0.00044179522,0.0000078289395,0.0000048977536,0.001051495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49080297,0.5045975,0.0010379845,0.002991825,0.0005271304,0.0000065713684,8.701612e-7,0.000008121609,0.000027008196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868823,0.0017333176,0.001713283,0.00014485554,0.0091334535,0.00039273425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6985331,0.29285607,0.0012723097,0.00078968506,0.004485228,0.002063611],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13911216,0.000104187115,0.0005873734,0.0001568733,0.00014721486,0.000024650877,0.00039430757,0.00083426904,0.000040464696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.51301336,0.000060925173,0.00010812746,0.00025123678,0.0036532946,0.00013575048,0.00028518654,0.013592849,0.0000031898794],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02532869,0.00252133,0.101861216,0.196698,0.003059492,0.0012797753,0.12116749,0.000008014671,0.0013027887,0.31335554,0.062258992,0.17115869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03902836,0.0043472955,0.65058637,0.18007459,0.0011578175,0.0050903433,0.0056029866,0.00013051224,0.0007288865,0.053616963,0.059156656,0.00047920225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007382022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009763412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5487252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000067131405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006669173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107313170","doi":"10.1136/jme.2004.009886","title":"Whose information is it anyway? Informing a 12-year-old patient of her terminal prognosis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Innovations in Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Vignette; Paternalism; Curriculum; Autonomy; Psychology; Health care; Medical education; Medicine; Social psychology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.040622495388088,"score_gpt":0.3819591538322397,"score_spread":0.34133665844415173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107313170","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67188776,0.00010838429,0.0033210358,0.3193246,0.0010837275,0.00035505128,0.000004697832,0.000018344557,0.003896379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9162057,0.00055051147,0.02696914,0.054849777,0.0011702082,0.000009867521,0.000015447033,0.00001415943,0.00021516444],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993092,0.00006614844,0.0017021763,0.00007562105,0.00484252,0.00022152023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99630356,0.0002769144,0.0009916016,0.00018725655,0.001975538,0.00026514797],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047887308,0.00013007155,0.00036127862,0.00038956667,0.000073410854,0.000023219975,0.00023129245,0.0008166704,0.001280583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016876789,0.00009812744,0.00013639561,0.00037487145,0.00026076482,0.00064233755,0.00005964491,0.003297375,0.000036777914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034168328,0.0009338815,0.006276466,0.0011237095,0.00017105666,0.000041640204,0.044063464,0.000010685451,0.00007531178,0.00259171,0.17919953,0.7651709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004473737,0.002095109,0.0063484283,0.0058433353,0.00028526204,0.0017068873,0.012431247,0.0036881596,0.003510389,0.00024540775,0.95909685,0.00027519383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024209237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000068268696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77989733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018868932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025256076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110451117","doi":"10.1136/jme.2004.011247","title":"Parental preferences for neonatal resuscitation research consent: a pilot study","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Neonatal Respiratory Health Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Parental consent; Family medicine; Likert scale; Medicine; Resuscitation; Population; Neonatal resuscitation; Medical emergency; Psychology; Alternative medicine; Emergency medicine","score_opus":0.5262297071198562,"score_gpt":0.5859322276780463,"score_spread":0.05970252055819014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110451117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89038545,0.004467838,0.0005434199,0.1018352,0.00056497374,0.0015715035,0.000014349636,0.000019721869,0.0005975329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993753,0.0014225682,0.001144964,0.0017400427,0.0016927184,0.00003419318,0.0000041420776,0.000018822617,0.00018950757],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98523605,0.0012451144,0.0010214982,0.00023207765,0.011733803,0.0005314429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824286,0.012434381,0.00024695444,0.0002238678,0.0035077175,0.0011584444],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.039213482,0.00012370637,0.00040438402,0.00046894813,0.00028199927,0.000046300043,0.00047076613,0.00038383662,0.0003183497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.085361384,0.00008913476,0.00008898122,0.0003924834,0.000574618,0.00016516606,0.0001249097,0.0071743396,0.000035598154],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.05318775,0.015360388,0.034350604,0.007850196,0.0008135985,0.0033018135,0.028516587,0.000020563546,0.002069407,0.0076182215,0.039828736,0.8070821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.04659265,0.14818268,0.058212824,0.00579475,0.00023948566,0.0019402674,0.031500656,0.0011841563,0.0015799127,0.0061877887,0.6980537,0.0005311143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011789579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016902544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80655104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030657716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013492187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111106415","doi":"10.1136/jme.2011.043349","title":"Post-trial period surveillance for randomised controlled cardiovascular studies: submitted protocols, consent forms and the role of the ethics board","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network; Health Sciences Centre; University of Toronto; Mount Sinai Hospital; Sunnybrook Health Science Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Period (music); Research ethics; Ethics committee; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Family medicine; Psychology; Political science; Pathology; Psychiatry; Public administration","score_opus":0.3893595027802974,"score_gpt":0.533335551845002,"score_spread":0.14397604906470463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111106415","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19477937,0.036185414,0.0026439214,0.6415654,0.0029309762,0.11979764,0.000043890876,0.00004522751,0.0020081801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96453327,0.023036182,0.0009561278,0.0069690393,0.0012125857,0.003070214,0.0000010787553,0.000048700447,0.00017278455],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.98248273,0.0042553153,0.0022816167,0.00026422963,0.010314961,0.0004011259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6265262,0.3489426,0.0022457181,0.0014698998,0.019949265,0.00086629926],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19524805,0.00022670635,0.002272641,0.000078458404,0.0003470996,0.000029903164,0.0008651687,0.002425939,0.000042024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7789337,0.00009267094,0.0018697076,0.00018733345,0.0050099157,0.00004838026,0.00031160563,0.017104533,7.4431165e-7],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"randomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.92353016,0.0005823219,0.0009483469,0.002868066,0.007461973,0.00007105273,0.02357894,0.0000021797966,0.00011744956,0.039239127,0.00020072682,0.0013996382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.91362435,0.0030984753,0.00044095828,0.0031112025,0.0009990599,0.00022571636,0.008680809,0.00022193324,0.00049734284,0.06298294,0.0059568807,0.00016034661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012251815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055482605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76975393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007710669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013584947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111184769","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2011-100040","title":"Proceduralisation, choice and parental reflections on decisions to accept newborn bloodspot screening","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Population; Psychological intervention; Presentation (obstetrics); Variety (cybernetics); Work (physics); Medicine; Psychology; Public relations; Nursing; Environmental health; Political science; Computer science; Obstetrics; Engineering","score_opus":0.7857851979027124,"score_gpt":0.6465429448723693,"score_spread":0.1392422530303431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111184769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5303398,0.00041170913,0.027943293,0.42289305,0.0013641722,0.0006179087,0.000008943059,0.000066827764,0.016354308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9232093,0.0027523672,0.049461007,0.022965763,0.0011800288,0.0000060073007,0.0000017954459,0.000026723474,0.00039701734],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99153244,0.00027900958,0.0009293395,0.00023727847,0.006733513,0.00028838555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95844424,0.035851575,0.00031707005,0.0003484307,0.0029748075,0.0020638634],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01662497,0.00013065037,0.00035861996,0.0002995533,0.000248489,0.000036801,0.00041077228,0.0014602948,0.0007435706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.45638305,0.00009362901,0.00012988881,0.0004368196,0.00042212068,0.00011270331,0.00019071207,0.013709807,0.000024443858],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008025995,0.008721469,0.23965113,0.0017882087,0.0019444128,0.0026053274,0.07965012,0.000057554556,0.003451254,0.20338844,0.041653596,0.4090625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009820227,0.012939506,0.7983216,0.018732466,0.0005628982,0.0032041096,0.008969617,0.00021989844,0.0019890966,0.06956415,0.07506375,0.0006126468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014390063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001302549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5586705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007239795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036199535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112645860","doi":"10.1136/jme.2010.039735","title":"What sort of bioethical values are the evidence-based medicine and the GRADE approaches willing to deal with?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Beneficence; Autonomy; Grading (engineering); Economic Justice; Psychology; Evidence-based medicine; Engineering ethics; MEDLINE; Medical education; Medicine; Law; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.4564160358627489,"score_gpt":0.5465373072681498,"score_spread":0.09012127140540083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112645860","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.064747706,0.0031117,0.009393025,0.9201897,0.0018903359,0.00046555683,9.797328e-7,0.000014133149,0.00018688959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87041885,0.01145222,0.0074343374,0.10728365,0.0033167538,0.000023653138,6.1406007e-7,0.000030922092,0.00003900328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97676206,0.011435046,0.0017193779,0.00026660424,0.009347733,0.00046918337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6914307,0.30254784,0.002075929,0.0006233391,0.0022851157,0.001037079],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.18178207,0.00021899221,0.00076572073,0.00013511583,0.0013037687,0.000039630482,0.001333225,0.0024159027,0.00024928016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31800964,0.00008557747,0.0001156617,0.0004163926,0.00902531,0.00038557558,0.00027082558,0.06347798,0.0000057467905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0077230195,0.0006629196,0.023203775,0.005839236,0.0008294787,0.0003830421,0.2993414,0.00018452219,0.00052828604,0.6180038,0.019013107,0.024287416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018604994,0.002860147,0.009546147,0.106980406,0.0019203172,0.0008162021,0.47662792,0.006786295,0.0003135462,0.29172915,0.08302979,0.00078507763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002633472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008919612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.812906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004334616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047430373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112676116","doi":"10.1136/jme.2005.014670","title":"Trust based obligations of the state and physician-researchers to patient-subjects: Figure 1","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Harm; Duty; Subject (documents); Clinical equipoise; Medicine; Voluntarism (philosophy); Obligation; Duty to protect; Clinical trial; Psychology; Public relations; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.5574794807903379,"score_gpt":0.6181967822179772,"score_spread":0.060717301427639314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112676116","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024218298,0.9339023,0.00024773972,0.0626839,0.00047871983,0.00090880773,0.00008166873,0.0000063790144,0.001448253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00017943037,0.9930105,0.0007038026,0.004771719,0.00047775256,0.000012749677,0.000007908945,0.000046419747,0.00078969117],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9804117,0.0018321123,0.0022201664,0.0002964511,0.014809479,0.00043008509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92641765,0.065872304,0.0014678007,0.0007598582,0.004233323,0.0012490504],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.027870582,0.00028636327,0.0018583004,0.00038022597,0.0001413302,0.000044046243,0.0010749919,0.0031986018,0.00019913464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2734037,0.00015680642,0.0008458299,0.0011094941,0.0014939283,0.000048529568,0.00038939537,0.034902174,0.000016241731],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012204187,0.0006371218,0.00004932402,0.066405825,0.00045800293,0.00025399902,0.00078307005,0.000014216802,0.0000031906936,0.0018575245,0.012070936,0.91734475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009281613,0.0010288273,0.00006694872,0.13608241,0.00061046693,0.000060894396,0.00013723822,0.000043765915,0.000016918404,0.0055947364,0.85526377,0.00016586971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009993729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020119958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91717887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024959716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03445779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99809545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114145320","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2013-101673","title":"Are hybrid umbilical cord blood banks really the best of both worlds?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Izaak Walton Killam Health Centre; University of Calgary; Alberta Children's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Umbilical cord; Donation; Business; Product (mathematics); Finance; Medicine; Economics; Immunology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.04697136451932709,"score_gpt":0.34906235554770737,"score_spread":0.3020909910283803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114145320","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8598049,0.0007304872,0.013392366,0.12022209,0.00088959036,0.00025463107,0.000007591234,0.000020134425,0.0046781544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99182075,0.0011692034,0.0010270478,0.0050739595,0.00074421894,0.0000015009026,0.0000023308723,0.000018660032,0.0001423067],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940415,0.00045063507,0.0010192544,0.000130237,0.0041444018,0.0002139622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99379283,0.0039997306,0.0007819095,0.00029693297,0.0006650241,0.00046359698],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008893307,0.00013243176,0.0005621115,0.00009151144,0.00006402215,0.000013770971,0.00037084575,0.0005221812,0.00032528714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011734689,0.000078147685,0.00020881266,0.00015421044,0.0004603094,0.000041158906,0.000030103643,0.0038778654,0.0000145087615],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015869493,0.01986884,0.33056688,0.034858167,0.0067890105,0.022710068,0.03305842,0.00014830529,0.028425755,0.10395341,0.08387826,0.3198734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.072372735,0.025742365,0.34151247,0.08760463,0.015703604,0.13328014,0.009449503,0.006555668,0.06325466,0.021968992,0.22036235,0.0021928982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000036875852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000647939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31768048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024214283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010182632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99842024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115053225","doi":"10.1136/jme.2008.027789","title":"Stimulating brains, altering minds","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Neurological disorders and treatments","field":"Medicine","cited_by":162,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Deep brain stimulation; Brain function; Harm; Personality; Neuroscience; Psychology; Disease; Stimulation; Brain disease; Brain stimulation; Parkinson's disease; Medicine; Psychiatry; Social psychology; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.08054795705397634,"score_gpt":0.41195978238590847,"score_spread":0.33141182533193214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115053225","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7212026,0.0007943232,0.0017002152,0.27298906,0.00029437998,0.000075114534,5.600223e-7,0.000017587126,0.0029261666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95726883,0.00043549848,0.001167345,0.04074486,0.0003159997,1.7137334e-7,7.527426e-7,0.000004754751,0.00006176922],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730986,0.000074192605,0.00041544533,0.000084833235,0.0019500657,0.00016561335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987128,0.0004885222,0.00015453387,0.0000840117,0.000175896,0.00038427982],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014810218,0.00008561723,0.00029055632,0.000058786372,0.0000556623,0.000012387893,0.00011583998,0.0004294345,0.00024067727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060784062,0.00005388274,0.00013121772,0.000089742905,0.00006303951,0.000044403296,0.000020516076,0.002362968,0.000006873899],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018494866,0.004870426,0.027255444,0.0004102397,0.0005682855,0.030460592,0.0034640334,0.00019617844,0.006913064,0.013487902,0.01186552,0.8986588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.07132642,0.0720231,0.5380444,0.010183291,0.0017856119,0.01281454,0.0012302744,0.014941233,0.0029684235,0.19351451,0.07970148,0.0014667489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000032206995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000013568429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89719206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020497777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003976896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115717399","doi":"10.1136/jme.2005.014589","title":"The need for a clinical ethics service and its goals in a community healthcare service centre: a survey","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Clinical Research Institute","funders":"National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke","keywords":"Health care; Service (business); Service provider; Public relations; Information ethics; Service delivery framework; Nursing ethics; Research ethics; Medicine; Sociology; Nursing; Business; Political science; Law; Marketing","score_opus":0.5063043996407767,"score_gpt":0.6371537282451479,"score_spread":0.13084932860437126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115717399","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13491297,0.0031997596,0.00049654854,0.85792774,0.002382803,0.00072777487,0.00004038264,0.000023749188,0.0002882489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6209906,0.025353251,0.0010447543,0.35005963,0.002270921,0.0000292525,0.000028200466,0.00006445947,0.00015895141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.87055665,0.117553525,0.004358563,0.000293531,0.0062079784,0.0010297559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3154323,0.66917396,0.0024809297,0.0006365051,0.011095693,0.0011806067],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.45474768,0.00025403546,0.0008814565,0.000110114896,0.0035532988,0.0000480261,0.001555304,0.006755111,0.00006150479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.61132693,0.00017096529,0.00013149077,0.0007904215,0.0005444702,0.00021999588,0.000624587,0.13775168,0.000024227125],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00893884,0.003966006,0.29476693,0.032216858,0.0005646409,0.0003485096,0.19821228,0.00003499547,0.000030882173,0.33740282,0.11647353,0.007043729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.021617988,0.0012298095,0.2874358,0.018191714,0.00029435504,0.00020087055,0.10157251,0.006940328,0.0000055689716,0.23975515,0.32188073,0.0008751695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023622809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46059766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55512434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022427087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015068678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99774396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115809010","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2014-102319","title":"Infant male circumcision and the autonomy of the child: two ethical questions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Best interests; Nothing; Psychology; Clinical Ethics; Social psychology; Male circumcision; Medicine; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Population","score_opus":0.11326713860165652,"score_gpt":0.5044116300681447,"score_spread":0.3911444914664882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115809010","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00000773443,0.8035091,0.00011906459,0.19301741,0.0012563673,0.0004495247,0.0000115810435,0.0000055712535,0.0016236342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006392609,0.98962486,0.00034125298,0.0065620863,0.0026427766,0.0000075562502,0.000004217281,0.000029282,0.00014868603],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876329,0.003401923,0.002257722,0.00021842716,0.006217659,0.00027137954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98345256,0.0110185845,0.0018306103,0.0006700123,0.0021626027,0.00086562266],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04915807,0.00029792523,0.0024522257,0.00017687376,0.00024024711,0.00003354895,0.0008797046,0.005219074,0.00012836086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.066777386,0.00012239329,0.0008018204,0.00047135405,0.002121181,0.000038702932,0.00040030302,0.04864314,0.000004906748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012644763,0.00018887452,0.000055696222,0.038017806,0.00050365087,0.00034209315,0.007538233,0.0000015693895,2.3734197e-8,0.13610247,0.006842456,0.8102807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001615073,0.00017121842,0.000012895876,0.04626256,0.0016205322,0.006172786,0.000113399845,0.000028983282,5.077808e-8,0.0027531302,0.9411425,0.000106900734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029816432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000055563836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019943061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030397834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99607235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116352333","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2013-101410","title":"The placebo effect in psychiatry: problem or solution?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pain Management and Placebo Effect","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Placebo; Viewpoints; Perspective (graphical); Placebo response; Psychiatry; Psychotherapist; Psychology; Clinical trial; Work (physics); Alternative medicine; Medicine; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.039054664341362184,"score_gpt":0.35164187585080803,"score_spread":0.31258721150944585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116352333","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12392861,0.00088774844,0.012447758,0.83949697,0.007870628,0.0020878364,0.0000012641005,0.0000758115,0.013203368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98295695,0.0021037338,0.0005712605,0.012558843,0.00079659553,0.000037956837,2.1423381e-7,0.000018767572,0.0009556938],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917903,0.004572075,0.000496297,0.00013126426,0.002689495,0.00032057878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97090346,0.028383,0.00027625664,0.0001528711,0.000075561715,0.00020886716],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.042110372,0.00011371007,0.00020107416,0.00010066558,0.0002230494,0.00011986847,0.0007734389,0.00037632935,0.00031979164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055031493,0.00005424825,0.00009083146,0.0003278967,0.0002453998,0.00018360344,0.000093679046,0.00357228,0.00012009549],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032419378,0.00069363206,0.01240386,0.0013012796,0.00011214923,0.0006405621,0.0027225132,0.00027321465,0.0064531993,0.061129183,0.6541495,0.256879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.035257746,0.00879443,0.016877117,0.007639676,0.0002883721,0.0014248342,0.0011421831,0.20053847,0.0065184687,0.16227116,0.557356,0.0018915688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003989104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002139058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85902834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041568772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063799624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99872655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116691119","doi":"10.1136/jme.2009.034421","title":"The use of methylphenidate among students: the future of enhancement?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Methylphenidate; Popularity; Cognition; Argument (complex analysis); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Clinical psychology; Psychiatry; Medicine; Social psychology; Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder","score_opus":0.12443787394165273,"score_gpt":0.4166089261707557,"score_spread":0.29217105222910295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116691119","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8588533,0.00014954992,0.004970631,0.12923445,0.00634993,0.00028167246,0.000012208986,0.000011884076,0.00013637247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842012,0.00482192,0.00065044535,0.009037083,0.0009470297,0.000006030707,5.616068e-7,0.000019524274,0.00031621684],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887318,0.0008925771,0.0015557739,0.00019590925,0.008319982,0.00030398264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843182,0.011857619,0.0018054022,0.0005883567,0.0011940922,0.00023634205],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01222914,0.00015818804,0.0003342465,0.00011860047,0.00037902614,0.000095924785,0.0025647567,0.0005980616,0.0003903275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053144302,0.00007951161,0.00017118824,0.0006474608,0.0043067806,0.0002740847,0.00040544066,0.009236436,0.0000050395565],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002024509,0.0012501007,0.00097160536,0.00021092275,0.00018751196,0.0000919891,0.005419715,0.000009283365,0.7547586,0.19565706,0.016771926,0.024468852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017466461,0.00073318806,0.0032448892,0.00052061403,0.00014006141,0.000087191234,0.0009509297,0.00022248435,0.5653365,0.017537283,0.409227,0.00025317623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018713616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018442867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3924551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019582325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088208687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99840295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116759841","doi":"10.1136/jme.2004.011213","title":"Britain’s new preimplantation tissue typing policy: an ethical defence","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Savior sibling; Preimplantation genetic diagnosis; Tissue Donation; Medicine; Transplantation; Bone marrow; Biology; Genetics; Embryo; Pathology; Surgery; Organ donation; Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation","score_opus":0.1404884134121764,"score_gpt":0.49269168709452354,"score_spread":0.35220327368234716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116759841","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000055738415,0.969452,0.011303527,0.017640691,0.0005498367,0.00022901886,0.00001780011,0.00003996893,0.00076158263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000057677862,0.9850999,0.0042618015,0.003778077,0.0064338716,0.0000021518356,0.000110491936,0.0000468698,0.00020917378],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99298906,0.0007697359,0.0015301714,0.00026167126,0.0040602563,0.0003890809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99100906,0.005475612,0.001022467,0.00031576096,0.00059462653,0.0015824789],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006422527,0.00034189245,0.0018067135,0.00037083344,0.000100500656,0.00006868007,0.0006019667,0.0063924557,0.00009581217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05595958,0.00024733297,0.00040938036,0.00040311183,0.00023271113,0.00010597485,0.00011587013,0.01924487,0.000037670197],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003840358,0.00010003169,0.000006931847,0.009082692,0.000110390036,0.0012771093,0.00021665839,0.0000032244989,2.2732647e-7,0.003875872,0.011334603,0.97395384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006882066,0.00062315806,0.0000344402,0.06739467,0.001207022,0.012157231,0.0000210127,0.00002629349,0.0000015190856,0.0011063652,0.91651964,0.00022047148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011712855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017112613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97373337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024712263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02305124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116897959","doi":"10.1136/jme.2004.013193","title":"Women’s reproductive autonomy: medicalisation and beyond","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Welfare; Poverty; Reproduction; Sociology; Political science; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.08706329593493715,"score_gpt":0.40599516880556774,"score_spread":0.3189318728706306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116897959","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000028860271,0.9734512,0.0005257296,0.023341993,0.0011336266,0.00034037762,0.000005038269,0.000046127512,0.0011270769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000062188425,0.99535155,0.00088334375,0.0006247504,0.0023909556,0.00002404922,0.000016759152,0.000039282557,0.0006071248],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938438,0.00059592305,0.0016886544,0.00054229004,0.002993895,0.0003354392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952115,0.0012882986,0.0016215129,0.0005728844,0.0008003369,0.00050546083],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012957749,0.0003710078,0.0025577021,0.00048817275,0.00010087287,0.000015987292,0.0003654989,0.0050698277,0.00024727537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030237705,0.00024073578,0.00039669566,0.00038648938,0.0014567303,0.00010008966,0.00017025873,0.014476946,0.000010490044],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028071243,0.00023486934,0.000016533146,0.012739654,0.00066293817,0.0008978637,0.0010958719,3.3927105e-8,1.3172337e-7,0.0028652214,0.0027539253,0.97870487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006815618,0.00043172226,0.00003984487,0.02603769,0.001465717,0.008986294,0.00020087167,0.0000013600626,0.0000014293581,0.0041528586,0.95781153,0.00018911541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006301491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001981525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97851574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065693207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0131384395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117114928","doi":"10.1136/jme.2008.025346","title":"The case for re-thinking incest laws","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Sexual intercourse; Intervention (counseling); Criminology; German; Psychology; Sister; Law; Sociology; Psychiatry; Political science; Social psychology; Demography; Population; History","score_opus":0.19528000325988426,"score_gpt":0.4564334402189912,"score_spread":0.2611534369591069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117114928","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26315826,0.00563677,0.0037100806,0.72522956,0.0012410661,0.0002616546,0.0000010598287,0.00004356615,0.0007179951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9728239,0.013629635,0.005125841,0.006661752,0.00158796,0.0000055928404,4.3980697e-7,0.000010895955,0.0001539891],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975162,0.00009118876,0.00050795986,0.000097622775,0.0015778798,0.00020913097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99537873,0.003009307,0.00029811743,0.0002137653,0.000849396,0.00025071137],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009825117,0.00007017672,0.00024315885,0.00005835556,0.00056809053,0.000010275496,0.00023061431,0.00060887856,0.000015419706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063589774,0.000035540514,0.00010831026,0.000121590536,0.00063265336,0.00004896138,0.00004873063,0.0038621526,0.000002122269],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033839203,0.0010427863,0.01132538,0.00263255,0.0006341954,0.13375726,0.016203685,0.000011736034,0.00025036113,0.20457105,0.23504335,0.3911437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031601386,0.002085377,0.0011075631,0.00080636446,0.0001008532,0.17527306,0.00392965,0.00020588688,0.00085642474,0.045322932,0.7670263,0.00012542788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038125112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000066255496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7185678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005193207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002315116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117266406","doi":"10.1136/jme.2006.019976","title":"Is Tom Shakespeare disabled?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Disability Rights and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Mainstream; Intellectual disability; Disability studies; Achondroplasia; Disabled people; Social model of disability; Temptation; Gender studies; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Medicine; Political science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.12404443024291546,"score_gpt":0.499225866216917,"score_spread":0.37518143597400155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117266406","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0866457,0.00030577873,0.0063114217,0.7647305,0.0025844153,0.00010768877,0.000001835407,0.000023068473,0.13928957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897624,0.000985767,0.0004054438,0.0046771225,0.0021297834,1.5352143e-7,4.402007e-7,0.000004752638,0.0020341016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945469,0.00023167407,0.00039632953,0.000071080874,0.0045585763,0.00019544663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99736667,0.0014617974,0.00016642756,0.00007569371,0.00050048,0.00042895216],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018597312,0.000045887653,0.00012781033,0.000041149895,0.0002578879,0.00005565901,0.0003466501,0.0006000277,0.0032304763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008879857,0.000028946226,0.00010977634,0.0001726602,0.00088319165,0.00016987276,0.000024848256,0.0015721436,0.000024928619],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010011441,0.00050219754,0.012076773,0.00008906764,0.00007984432,0.00023921377,0.19761151,0.0000040619234,0.00002653689,0.65007085,0.052080557,0.08711927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049514073,0.00008342689,0.003924076,0.00018708996,0.000025177902,0.000021421667,0.021975204,0.000020778472,0.00011557963,0.08532852,0.887726,0.00009755405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006510114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036478832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90311676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006962555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013396537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117887411","doi":"10.1136/jme.28.1.37","title":"Is there an advocate in the house? The role of health care professionals in patient advocacy","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cancer Care Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Consumer Advocacy; Patient advocacy; Health professionals; Medicine; Health care; Nursing; MEDLINE; Political science; Public relations; Data science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.27390992399067693,"score_gpt":0.595617720362545,"score_spread":0.3217077963718681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117887411","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010149532,0.87229127,0.000014071796,0.1232385,0.0013434385,0.0015001756,0.000014707637,0.000011140951,0.0014852101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032397215,0.9576972,0.00014482214,0.03787833,0.0008329207,0.000092973016,0.000007263324,0.00008070242,0.000026067348],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.89169496,0.08880439,0.006566442,0.0004087212,0.011618655,0.0009068187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9095583,0.08081241,0.0068351794,0.0010180605,0.0012679248,0.00050809776],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1285743,0.00045405055,0.0026047013,0.00035180268,0.0008420841,0.000016814274,0.0031941729,0.0054389057,0.0009273697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.091778435,0.000203195,0.00048337303,0.0009190232,0.0007683315,0.00018251372,0.00043836772,0.106106505,0.00005574423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027185184,0.00061188894,0.00006158792,0.024457265,0.00006660125,0.00013804568,0.2886644,5.1004315e-7,6.784418e-9,0.0032331771,0.005993852,0.6767455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047736673,0.00032164942,0.000034884513,0.10294056,0.00011511289,0.000074683245,0.16558285,0.000008282964,3.968317e-8,0.002927869,0.7273771,0.00013956024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010012112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013250982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7213833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005989423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038507592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117941509","doi":"10.1136/jme.2010.035451","title":"Ethical considerations for classifying patients as ‘palliative’ when calculating Hospital Standardised Mortality Ratios","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; London Health Sciences Centre; Western University; University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Palliative care; Statistic; Medicine; Nursing; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2398516124227503,"score_gpt":0.5157182015512686,"score_spread":0.27586658912851825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117941509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9135182,0.00018835548,0.017248621,0.06654087,0.0014167143,0.00040262428,0.000049746428,0.000018222401,0.0006166383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9702247,0.00022954252,0.024374574,0.0043217526,0.00079405116,0.000004876177,0.0000157508,0.00001801385,0.00001678309],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99470663,0.00022926844,0.001108034,0.00016969765,0.00355022,0.00023616842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875759,0.006876071,0.0007559399,0.0001989126,0.003987759,0.000605422],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005285716,0.00016495422,0.0006292416,0.000093175324,0.00018183899,0.0000326247,0.00014613855,0.0015414369,0.00041536795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13948542,0.00012450012,0.0003204281,0.00008508288,0.00047545574,0.00011587088,0.00004275398,0.00664542,0.0000021945],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011342554,0.0023257753,0.7593684,0.0025368244,0.002409664,0.000540151,0.096231714,0.00004286521,0.0053743036,0.09799058,0.02471128,0.007334194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.083195366,0.017211491,0.3904636,0.028258968,0.005037923,0.00032689926,0.021963298,0.0117487125,0.034837175,0.24605021,0.15828334,0.0026230174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004604881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014224055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3689048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007406971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003589135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118085872","doi":"10.1136/jme.2004.007815","title":"Commentary on the Olivieri symposium","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; St. Boniface Hospital; University of Victoria; Saint Mary's University; Western University; St. Mary's University; St Joseph's Health Care; Brampton Civic Hospital; Trillium Health Centre; William Osler Health System","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Constructive; Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.04826708013232368,"score_gpt":0.3659087608008697,"score_spread":0.31764168066854603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118085872","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019597905,0.00031657497,0.0016572841,0.97638524,0.00088323123,0.00008405437,9.819094e-7,0.000008218356,0.0010665008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7188656,0.0030948773,0.00033109478,0.2758533,0.001792389,9.001669e-7,0.0000025562213,0.000010355544,0.0000489571],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943514,0.00017704743,0.00049522193,0.00008140138,0.0047328738,0.00016207078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976499,0.0011235912,0.00021695532,0.00017197769,0.0003707392,0.0004668189],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007783096,0.00009576077,0.00024456202,0.000075564865,0.00013725717,0.0000161951,0.00025201266,0.0009983527,0.0003581818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023745648,0.000045448534,0.00016854827,0.00016235736,0.0010999602,0.000033709715,0.000047791887,0.0067052683,0.000016656535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013140832,0.0037602615,0.0003085749,0.0010520479,0.00091941794,0.0033054152,0.016111236,0.00024406023,0.005474905,0.6604627,0.26484746,0.04219988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011145537,0.0050170715,0.0028003599,0.010110933,0.00045192306,0.0041254875,0.0016388828,0.0005522139,0.004219646,0.110874675,0.84872156,0.00034173246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002841444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014005011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70053196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010558489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016282368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118248473","doi":"10.1136/jme.2008.024810","title":"Can a moral reasoning exercise improve response quality to surveys of healthcare priorities?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Respondent; Preference; Health care; Intervention (counseling); Consistency (knowledge bases); Psychology; Quality (philosophy); Moral reasoning; Family medicine; Medicine; Social psychology; Nursing; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.5260973093178622,"score_gpt":0.5170965421181688,"score_spread":0.009000767199693449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118248473","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6112106,0.0021613627,0.0034772435,0.3813199,0.0012164086,0.0002878953,0.0002073908,0.000013302995,0.0001059268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759745,0.0016001073,0.0049825143,0.016568968,0.0006044935,0.000010589408,0.000004021879,0.000028806979,0.00022601291],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98438656,0.0052034585,0.008054759,0.00035764306,0.0014976511,0.00049989956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98361516,0.008644477,0.0050939023,0.0005062592,0.0009963316,0.0011438961],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.26817825,0.00018650449,0.0017352254,0.00044602924,0.00022805925,0.000027301308,0.00064509537,0.0008927977,0.00020461624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1642291,0.00020813275,0.00025790048,0.00031756377,0.0002749113,0.00024421557,0.00010592848,0.002403202,0.00005764235],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035247304,0.0011679472,0.39533147,0.008393255,0.0005333266,0.0003504315,0.18722795,0.00034836083,0.00006693147,0.35319218,0.04418839,0.0056750257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0084207,0.0030679177,0.8853609,0.00699801,0.00004464336,0.0005876584,0.015866786,0.0017126297,0.00016924474,0.03742416,0.03879873,0.0015486092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008876048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001300247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49002942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066447235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006387314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118295721","doi":"10.1136/jme.2005.012575","title":"Psychopharmacology and memory","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Memory and Neural Mechanisms","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Psychopharmacology; Amygdala; Hippocampus; Neuroscience; Prefrontal cortex; Computer science; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Psychiatry; Cognition","score_opus":0.341896473173168,"score_gpt":0.5210830127209514,"score_spread":0.17918653954778335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118295721","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004434205,0.9913178,0.00009599841,0.0034200547,0.0040596207,0.00015066066,0.00000572603,0.000012737893,0.00089304935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000015277152,0.99305195,0.000068579604,0.0051411972,0.0013820559,0.0000030759297,4.5967855e-7,0.000023273182,0.00031414832],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937924,0.0017786337,0.0011229619,0.00027316975,0.002777117,0.00025573242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992162,0.0061086654,0.001017393,0.00014823057,0.000094289564,0.0004694518],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054990537,0.00026692,0.0013673564,0.00021387581,0.00011776962,0.00003341967,0.0008269424,0.0022285073,0.0006537032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010797221,0.00017153578,0.00034630235,0.00021900985,0.00036460083,0.00008207026,0.00013508603,0.010543442,0.00003228774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001768642,0.000078927245,1.8433933e-8,0.007954122,0.000016762922,0.0022418434,0.000049446804,1.2861923e-7,0.00013029693,0.0014152526,0.005581789,0.9825137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046878384,0.00019670199,6.1656294e-8,0.0065478254,0.00028645847,0.007980465,0.0000041499115,0.000004700129,0.0004822187,0.0013231175,0.98254365,0.00016184925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000010935779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000018547576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9823519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030646315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017031585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118644202","doi":"10.1136/jme.2004.010595","title":"Project Examining Effectiveness in Clinical Ethics (PEECE): phase 1—descriptive analysis of nine clinical ethics services","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Sciences Centre; Sunnybrook Health Science Centre; University of Toronto","funders":"Hospital for Sick Children; University of Toronto; Toronto Rehabilitation Institute","keywords":"Benchmarking; Accountability; Service delivery framework; Service (business); Best practice; Scope (computer science); Business ethics; Descriptive statistics; Medicine; Medical education; Public relations; Political science; Business; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.49647479878106393,"score_gpt":0.6842085218543379,"score_spread":0.18773372307327396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118644202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8016989,0.0018858891,0.022383858,0.16078956,0.008005506,0.0012899062,0.000058766054,0.00009245225,0.0037951479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9304232,0.021290725,0.009708203,0.03411841,0.004196682,0.000028174125,0.000028184535,0.0000834209,0.00012297902],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.83140105,0.13853937,0.012104951,0.0009772256,0.015714355,0.0012630194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.43640667,0.54564327,0.0072335717,0.0010325537,0.008178072,0.001505874],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.57700264,0.00052298116,0.003491846,0.0013240499,0.00094136357,0.000035397654,0.0022429638,0.017769922,0.0010077265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.67783624,0.0004111923,0.000988302,0.0030849436,0.0031507162,0.0006959846,0.00082497986,0.220982,0.000048115544],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014094051,0.018642867,0.4139551,0.01765575,0.013840802,0.0024103327,0.39011386,0.0007523298,0.0001952409,0.05875543,0.0039461507,0.06563809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0878754,0.016994733,0.29287833,0.07720738,0.021645796,0.00029291408,0.21082984,0.061249275,0.00015767702,0.017929172,0.20970203,0.0032374456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012544197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008100996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4071039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005142129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029240174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119111030","doi":"10.1136/jme.2010.042069","title":"Bioethics in a clinic for women with psychosis","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alphora Research (Canada); University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Psychosis; Psychiatry; Medicine; Psychology; Data science; Family medicine; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.826339660559571,"score_gpt":0.6733824418719813,"score_spread":0.1529572186875897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119111030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74654984,0.0017396836,0.0017836186,0.23464899,0.00496116,0.0008325126,0.0000532477,0.000053721822,0.009377254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9562019,0.004340334,0.0011886745,0.037166733,0.00076545,0.000041873725,0.0000012364586,0.000022600525,0.00027120303],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99585843,0.0011518465,0.0009910299,0.00018773785,0.0011950572,0.00061592367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931949,0.004301419,0.000420848,0.00012774506,0.00064944895,0.0013056744],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.023813954,0.000176463,0.00046180523,0.00016896249,0.00014475976,0.000009390139,0.00061801996,0.003914498,0.0051658717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050343205,0.00012846186,0.00009865458,0.00030088346,0.0009535613,0.00012175359,0.00004869895,0.019599693,0.000027944105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.08354316,0.014735828,0.22596107,0.0070422813,0.0030576119,0.0049546254,0.21389785,0.00006569038,0.00066727423,0.094340034,0.06350383,0.28823072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.024388552,0.009327576,0.013258611,0.0015966847,0.00039362622,0.0009749339,0.016254948,0.0011161789,0.0038010916,0.050481904,0.87749285,0.00091303414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038927785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022686075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81398904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012869397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023141266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99737865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120324893","doi":"10.1136/jme.2007.021832","title":"A pilot study of bullying and harassment among medical professionals in Pakistan, focussing on psychiatry: need for a medical ombudsman","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Workplace Violence and Bullying","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Psychiatry; Medical education; Medicine; Psychology; Nursing","score_opus":0.08835422585483628,"score_gpt":0.4574704126801956,"score_spread":0.36911618682535935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120324893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8983878,0.00035912378,0.00041193035,0.099203765,0.001026559,0.0004073162,8.4914313e-7,0.000011096045,0.00019155715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951848,0.0011300143,0.00041490622,0.0023795336,0.0008210298,0.000015476619,4.6634975e-7,0.000013441813,0.00004035271],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862361,0.001197868,0.0013380614,0.00023055398,0.010564473,0.00043292568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99345016,0.00453489,0.0006233832,0.00012007502,0.00036547607,0.00090603024],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.030302918,0.00016355496,0.00058837386,0.0002742705,0.0006296465,0.000033466367,0.0006679591,0.0007383739,0.0002813641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018650869,0.000116075265,0.000094007584,0.00041476297,0.0009921844,0.00015759886,0.000110712324,0.0039790613,8.3292133e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023177937,0.015380205,0.76484543,0.00062034995,0.0003003895,0.0016079339,0.16165484,0.00001540895,0.000028379034,0.022513963,0.009770783,0.020944543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.042120144,0.026952729,0.1745202,0.075176775,0.0003107926,0.00048650592,0.6556974,0.002529997,0.00004639379,0.013154907,0.0075357496,0.0014684086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012315218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010168211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59032524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000109481254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008512726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120552255","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2013-101543","title":"Anaesthesia, amnesia and harm","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Anesthesia and Sedative Agents","field":"Medicine","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Unconsciousness; Amnesia; Harm; Consciousness; Intraoperative Awareness; Anesthesia; Anterograde amnesia; Psychology; Medicine; General anaesthesia; Arousal; Implicit memory; Psychiatry; Cognition; Neuroscience; Social psychology; Propofol","score_opus":0.05412111687538386,"score_gpt":0.370254178685427,"score_spread":0.31613306181004314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120552255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8175607,0.00060602656,0.008065198,0.17200942,0.00016343672,0.00006083367,1.5485695e-7,0.0000107210935,0.0015235133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97866833,0.0014484645,0.0012485716,0.01792195,0.00051472295,3.3857887e-7,6.2571496e-7,0.000009324804,0.00018766109],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971691,0.00021838424,0.00034377465,0.00007998401,0.0020600443,0.00012874849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983836,0.00050168834,0.00017329188,0.000098559416,0.00031840382,0.00052446796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049214703,0.000081654995,0.00031648093,0.00007604928,0.000052852534,0.000012174959,0.00012409597,0.00048627143,0.00020252852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060021332,0.000053116655,0.000077962526,0.00007330135,0.00023237121,0.0000546809,0.000020735353,0.0019911095,0.000013759305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014649436,0.0014579217,0.28643066,0.0015915603,0.00062505336,0.008699705,0.015642738,0.0000035077576,0.0013617257,0.10146344,0.045572106,0.5356867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0065196645,0.0034305637,0.31469086,0.0017722814,0.00040497395,0.010637773,0.0010441289,0.0015797254,0.0004774768,0.004591477,0.65457547,0.00027562762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010977275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003066948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60900337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016146338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005307947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86504906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121440967","doi":"10.1136/jme.2009.032169","title":"When physicians forego the doctor–patient relationship, should they elect to self-prescribe or curbside? An empirical and ethical analysis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medical prescription; Family medicine; Medicine; Spouse; Nursing; Law","score_opus":0.6239728903641669,"score_gpt":0.6365905079720495,"score_spread":0.012617617607882603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121440967","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3842774,0.00045158868,0.0011394649,0.6128204,0.000539546,0.00029611334,0.00002106013,0.000050110608,0.00040433236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80229366,0.00063812925,0.0005946348,0.19546834,0.0009214232,0.0000060127186,0.0000050449794,0.000011947991,0.00006084005],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909504,0.004665632,0.0010917729,0.00032441,0.0023389016,0.00062886596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886677,0.008183273,0.000357107,0.00028277657,0.00070219167,0.0018069297],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012879463,0.000277464,0.0006223106,0.00022568736,0.00072987005,0.00007198625,0.0007906556,0.004169965,0.00094000396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010487036,0.00016598657,0.00026861503,0.0006834423,0.0003633106,0.00016000937,0.00011931274,0.029599918,0.00001422443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010962496,0.0062365555,0.12982051,0.00048765863,0.006474488,0.0033840716,0.2577742,0.00502696,0.000842819,0.11073364,0.23178421,0.23647238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004904393,0.008181785,0.084082104,0.00044107912,0.0073778513,0.0013073632,0.0049467664,0.040798604,0.0011352841,0.06639751,0.7792075,0.0012197125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003594765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049210276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54742336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013639413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014541446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121711654","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2012-100551","title":"Ethical concerns for maternal surrogacy and reproductive tourism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Medical tourism; Liberian dollar; Tourism; Ethical issues; Reproductive rights; Political science; Economic growth; Reproductive health; Environmental ethics; Business; Medicine; Engineering ethics; Law; Environmental health; Economics; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.12840016122347225,"score_gpt":0.46272698333422563,"score_spread":0.3343268221107534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121711654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5702909,0.0046870047,0.0024907931,0.4205432,0.0014496421,0.00025398683,0.0000029825924,0.00003364364,0.00024780905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798698,0.0032514106,0.0060770116,0.0054392833,0.0052315765,0.0000063053903,9.137454e-7,0.000014718317,0.00010899738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968967,0.00015746089,0.0005666743,0.00018490652,0.0018410861,0.00035321695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996421,0.0013906085,0.00033107615,0.00023142001,0.0009833944,0.00064253283],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013897525,0.00011628496,0.00044493203,0.00010778582,0.00009838332,0.000012566211,0.00014854205,0.0016039135,0.00006724478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06117928,0.000077677534,0.00010554689,0.00009265851,0.00060452375,0.00011805994,0.00007539474,0.0065246457,0.0000031155494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0075067356,0.0018233432,0.3034045,0.0064269295,0.0012300514,0.0011564312,0.016873727,0.0000014597408,0.0033038643,0.31782812,0.10505536,0.2353895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011354948,0.0051668566,0.17660159,0.0024077855,0.00060735637,0.017412558,0.0039000367,0.00006761838,0.021968206,0.04334221,0.716658,0.0005128084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028904718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000023232385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61160266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006068556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011228649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122515369","doi":"10.1136/jme.2010.040675","title":"Authorship policies of bioethics journals: Table 1","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Alberta; University of Ottawa","funders":"National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Bioethics; Acknowledgement; Engineering ethics; Empirical research; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.8819711830909628,"score_gpt":0.6805012307891853,"score_spread":0.20146995230177744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122515369","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22548784,0.011795616,0.011343791,0.69604146,0.0040517314,0.00046503902,0.000021674494,0.00006711048,0.050725702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9363136,0.041143425,0.011682782,0.008153893,0.0014039448,0.0000013683676,8.250545e-7,0.00004200573,0.001258141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9783499,0.0010274367,0.0024500908,0.00019855854,0.017436972,0.0005370259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89524204,0.07670377,0.0027667144,0.0011319829,0.020318376,0.0038371293],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12224407,0.00018220513,0.000927888,0.0004747827,0.00012106303,0.000027771488,0.0011462591,0.005659331,0.0030910736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.50702757,0.00012597007,0.00041986135,0.0006935365,0.003330958,0.00015075278,0.00029487556,0.043693688,0.000024944564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028426484,0.0036297287,0.040539626,0.006646594,0.0013162233,0.0029315427,0.048710495,0.0000049746645,0.0024983091,0.87039316,0.012431973,0.0080547435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0067422986,0.007869252,0.023505308,0.025964571,0.0007539985,0.004787162,0.009180164,0.00018828904,0.02682763,0.87527966,0.01837122,0.0005304248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005954474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041354404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7108258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009561795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019772954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123011221","doi":"10.1136/jme.2006.017954","title":"Reflective professionalism: interpreting CanMEDS’ “professionalism”: Table 1","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Innovations in Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Medical education; Accountability; Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.10220439994291247,"score_gpt":0.5204174073310824,"score_spread":0.41821300738816997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123011221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47915334,0.0016957338,0.04775722,0.44593376,0.012474882,0.00044914256,0.0000029162156,0.000064196545,0.012468803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92269033,0.00021154208,0.018646581,0.054966245,0.0021162317,0.0000057406714,0.000016903772,0.000034319535,0.0013120759],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99097717,0.0002777544,0.0013952926,0.0001830745,0.0067621362,0.00040459004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925253,0.002167818,0.0008393735,0.0002494803,0.0038583984,0.00035964246],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.030392533,0.00016280453,0.00044820842,0.0003896922,0.00023232804,0.00001583541,0.0003793555,0.001479301,0.0014192798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07774646,0.00011360567,0.0001226925,0.00089647155,0.00039458307,0.00016451433,0.00011426798,0.010070339,0.000018071178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003770613,0.0042367256,0.012997981,0.0022688708,0.0009195785,0.0034727666,0.0611832,0.000009469395,0.0081860265,0.13115886,0.44205338,0.32974252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0109347785,0.0021169852,0.027771061,0.03850386,0.0006063988,0.01114476,0.052980047,0.001491484,0.009949595,0.033891022,0.80964476,0.0009652431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000047993868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018206394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44353703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004583484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008059912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123438626","doi":"10.1136/jme.26.1.37","title":"Ethical considerations in international HIV vaccine trials: summary of a consultative process conducted by the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS","keywords":"Safeguarding; HIV vaccine; Developing country; Medicine; Clinical trial; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); AIDS Vaccines; Economic growth; Informed consent; Developed country; Political science; Environmental health; Family medicine; Alternative medicine; Nursing; Vaccine trial; Population","score_opus":0.12892783244736164,"score_gpt":0.4313862735105547,"score_spread":0.3024584410631931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123438626","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16299328,0.0004358562,0.0004567217,0.82880163,0.0003950428,0.00049317593,0.00007274989,0.000022217047,0.006329298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841604,0.003981264,0.0006051033,0.009479733,0.00056854164,0.000020735395,0.000038764436,0.000012732847,0.0011327236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99143946,0.0033717572,0.0014976525,0.00014929834,0.0032972815,0.00024454057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97620296,0.020043738,0.0007899729,0.00012068327,0.0025470264,0.00029560784],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023771038,0.00013125282,0.00052015233,0.0006598594,0.0003710368,0.00008437235,0.00044780917,0.00093014044,0.0034414139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16435753,0.000086621374,0.00015581932,0.0015788162,0.0002713746,0.00020504401,0.000023955574,0.005097837,0.000008311614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008311576,0.002119422,0.001633531,0.000108291766,0.0006008123,0.0002304602,0.17387667,0.0003100195,0.00021871374,0.64908653,0.16136615,0.0096182525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.031618457,0.00201132,0.0028160806,0.006008559,0.00060487346,0.00030193638,0.14395215,0.0023665633,0.0016458394,0.16200899,0.64564973,0.0010154963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003044959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021110072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8211671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010998226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042437315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124699191","doi":"10.1136/jme.28.3.203","title":"One principle and three fallacies of disability studies","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Association on Gerontology; Anglo American (Canada); Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Fallacy; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2988441407443604,"score_gpt":0.41469315826498276,"score_spread":0.11584901752062238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124699191","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008161564,0.017245883,0.000007500269,0.96841687,0.0032558776,0.000112414025,0.000039483024,0.0000066783487,0.0027537465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029659046,0.04022199,0.0003788389,0.8871147,0.039980147,0.000005817157,0.0000148688405,0.000047803125,0.0025768015],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99516886,0.0002509342,0.0010470169,0.00013167136,0.003169728,0.00023178334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964612,0.0019432587,0.00075211213,0.00017240863,0.00048220498,0.00018883024],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003728541,0.00017246745,0.0007414579,0.000059607835,0.00020483226,0.000032647447,0.00032091443,0.001155953,0.0019232911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015954127,0.00012008965,0.00016027816,0.000020258776,0.002487556,0.000070004106,0.000098286386,0.008747671,0.000005394372],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071608534,0.0003022299,0.0012927119,0.016108947,0.0004956158,0.000094893665,0.03976335,1.09778014e-7,1.0814369e-7,0.03496805,0.9011327,0.0057696435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004256767,0.0004450681,0.00021199249,0.002057655,0.0001123468,0.000034862198,0.0017592667,0.0000039986567,5.2048813e-7,0.016863294,0.97796136,0.0001239851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000114047165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021290306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.081302166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006711706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004241443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124703080","doi":"10.1136/jme.2009.030866","title":"Free riding and organ donation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Organ donation; Computer science; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Medicine; Data science; Transplantation; Surgery","score_opus":0.024990145890238645,"score_gpt":0.3637214948321161,"score_spread":0.33873134894187745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124703080","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00096188724,0.001970055,0.0036631385,0.15006228,0.84199715,0.00015354849,0.000042169435,0.000036333244,0.0011134533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005653092,0.03184633,0.0013910832,0.0022659518,0.95844465,4.4537774e-7,0.00012248888,0.00003200292,0.00024395742],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99173975,0.0001418645,0.00065676816,0.00012946269,0.0072072013,0.0001249607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995037,0.0024308655,0.00050328946,0.00012534678,0.0015176351,0.000385844],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052787564,0.00015056955,0.000450901,0.00027093632,0.000070332695,0.000039975723,0.00021008193,0.0034039116,0.0002342739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034816388,0.00011688478,0.000097690056,0.00013367506,0.00010767529,0.00009823977,0.000022005333,0.008595987,0.0000036291283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017884401,0.00009204647,0.000038727692,0.00066770875,0.00010858294,0.0005158496,0.0009861826,2.3593724e-7,0.00005943722,0.00072162785,0.9889681,0.0076626586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005857438,0.0006559682,0.0007084499,0.0037790681,0.00059889606,0.0007156643,0.00010423709,0.00004389898,0.00020726593,0.0021101178,0.9850518,0.00016719515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012612992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035469533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14779632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010360246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003915244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124805033","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2013-101320","title":"What's trust got to do with it? Revisiting opioid contracts","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Opioid Use Disorder Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"NeuroDevNet; University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Distrust; Humility; Appeal; Credibility; Adversarial system; Context (archaeology); Compromise; Medical prescription; Psychology; Medicine; Chronic pain; Public relations; Social psychology; Psychiatry; Psychotherapist; Nursing; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03039623290554548,"score_gpt":0.3564840927840321,"score_spread":0.3260878598784866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124805033","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4793214,0.0033615574,0.0008214998,0.5136764,0.0008313391,0.00051510223,0.0000011262388,0.00001977403,0.0014518407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93491614,0.008333003,0.006669956,0.047731023,0.0018853826,0.000016492206,0.0000049712785,0.00004509314,0.00039796805],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99466985,0.0001439758,0.0007346456,0.00017690883,0.0039319005,0.00034269947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99589854,0.0010094588,0.00034323055,0.00025906233,0.0012596527,0.001230075],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029953017,0.0001910655,0.00058236107,0.00013690797,0.000081392594,0.00017860853,0.00025267067,0.00056746526,0.0015201994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070081134,0.00011642045,0.00012995688,0.00020905887,0.0001240117,0.00040161953,0.000054328113,0.003276089,0.00016436975],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028421297,0.0043071085,0.032707933,0.0038409443,0.003200545,0.015635906,0.0985053,0.00009929247,0.0010269216,0.007271048,0.11269942,0.71786344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.042541236,0.016896844,0.1682927,0.09739465,0.0025089774,0.017675603,0.107741624,0.00077444036,0.0024118798,0.003152166,0.5389184,0.0016915206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007857025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014869799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7161719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013288966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022822737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99939257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125504071","doi":"10.1136/jme.2007.022467","title":"Evaluating solutions to sponsorship bias","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Data science; Computer science","score_opus":0.9394107759060534,"score_gpt":0.7136044306784155,"score_spread":0.22580634522763787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125504071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7463934,0.0012567017,0.00086510286,0.24661057,0.0031896653,0.00018933501,0.000015308633,0.000038891845,0.0014410552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9373325,0.002064997,0.0010467626,0.05679955,0.0022477335,0.0000062012973,0.000001890631,0.000015952965,0.00048440072],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901955,0.004966938,0.0010454454,0.00018497919,0.0029306791,0.0006764194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985766,0.010091719,0.00033356663,0.00015133058,0.0010987849,0.0025585985],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.045741137,0.0001743387,0.00038983926,0.00018442328,0.00080189714,0.000012003051,0.0006795799,0.0027641584,0.005331284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06163075,0.0001444357,0.0001865447,0.00041785988,0.00050659635,0.000121758625,0.00015480358,0.019790858,0.00026581757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015225955,0.0068679927,0.04982574,0.0018316403,0.002145349,0.019490588,0.06556443,0.0120288925,0.023851687,0.1360209,0.4157659,0.25138092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004032105,0.0015195914,0.007985095,0.0005330896,0.00029333532,0.0062010344,0.000726971,0.006588673,0.0045605586,0.0029530071,0.9641276,0.0004789442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018306513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020773892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54836166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013913734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045364765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99853045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125619365","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2013-101343","title":"Questionable content of an industry-supported medical school lecture series: a case study","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Curriculum; Medical education; Conflict of interest; Public relations; Pharmaceutical industry; Process (computing); Political science; Business; Medicine; Psychology; Pedagogy; Law; Computer science; Pharmacology","score_opus":0.5923706838771461,"score_gpt":0.6128340212972897,"score_spread":0.020463337420143612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125619365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9109081,0.0005567237,0.00011654727,0.08598053,0.0015635063,0.0005326313,0.000017339235,0.000031797128,0.00029279853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756276,0.00053782726,0.00012093188,0.022066317,0.0013443854,0.00002358395,0.0000050570325,0.000020657486,0.00025366532],"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"case_report","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900531,0.0038034802,0.0017151427,0.00025706043,0.0035936353,0.0005775848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889267,0.002119267,0.0007022392,0.00024793847,0.0023358788,0.0056679705],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.016645776,0.00027621642,0.0007158943,0.00017232768,0.00031412352,0.00003283258,0.000802829,0.007963257,0.05261021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027922697,0.00020754662,0.00015389343,0.00035894552,0.0008102741,0.00047868086,0.00015974959,0.03967751,0.00004492951],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":"case_report","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0067008873,0.046632346,0.21650182,0.0040021976,0.007088743,0.3338161,0.046381567,0.0012287609,0.009779205,0.00970219,0.1024351,0.21573108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.06372453,0.031142183,0.027048707,0.0041581676,0.0039548646,0.40113777,0.1724873,0.036440562,0.0229806,0.01185259,0.22179918,0.00327352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011054111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003606936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21245757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012648808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0087603815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126030002","doi":"10.1136/jme.2010.036517","title":"Understanding preferences for disclosure of individual biomarker results among participants in a longitudinal birth cohort","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Child and Family Research Institute; Simon Fraser University","funders":"National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; National Cancer Institute","keywords":"Biomarker; Cohort; Medicine; Cohort study; Health professionals; Longitudinal study; Psychology; Clinical psychology; Family medicine; Demography; Health care; Internal medicine; Biology; Pathology","score_opus":0.25925020442303026,"score_gpt":0.3943164287414265,"score_spread":0.1350662243183962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126030002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99056834,0.000018438392,0.004152551,0.004170656,0.00030404952,0.00024654792,0.000028724306,0.0000041952126,0.0005065221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986391,0.00022040796,0.00080779515,0.00021989788,0.00008176311,0.000006854828,0.00000292653,0.00001063992,0.000010621109],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99463326,0.00033661234,0.0009903078,0.0002692854,0.0033424199,0.00042811112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962384,0.0024874024,0.00063074747,0.00016507185,0.00003412135,0.00044427125],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022854907,0.00013534096,0.00033326508,0.00010741229,0.00010542149,0.0000251804,0.00049514446,0.0006133465,0.00047511878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012822212,0.00010242545,0.0000861169,0.00022897679,0.0010875064,0.00026176497,0.00017664931,0.002870297,0.0000042658667],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016047893,0.00018912462,0.99264145,0.00006205344,0.00004901477,0.000042968994,0.0030547278,0.00004997841,0.00038457612,0.00014762949,0.00022063588,0.002997346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015502525,0.00021679034,0.9919415,0.00034693818,0.000047215046,0.000017456836,0.0011822897,0.0008254003,0.00027202233,0.003098739,0.00038090663,0.00012049183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020567347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052136644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010032696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014605488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036371662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126701700","doi":"10.1136/jme.27.4.234","title":"Ethics, economics, and public financing of health care","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Hamilton Health Sciences; McMaster University Medical Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Public health; Distribution (mathematics); Work (physics); Variety (cybernetics); Health policy; Health law; International health; Business; Public economics; Public relations; Economics; Economic growth; Political science; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.17716202052361774,"score_gpt":0.3763455990587372,"score_spread":0.19918357853511948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126701700","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07838826,0.032905396,0.0078598,0.87610686,0.0012320752,0.00012978485,0.000027016833,0.000009508877,0.0033413195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87138194,0.11233075,0.0009888132,0.014933844,0.00030663743,0.000001060933,0.000001901719,0.000011998724,0.000043049473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974106,0.00017191612,0.0016475865,0.00016877196,0.00028081055,0.00032033873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99721974,0.0006717812,0.0012872176,0.00017948415,0.0002512962,0.0003904986],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016188713,0.000104825216,0.00061149604,0.00029904765,0.00014665113,0.000034925648,0.00033079833,0.00068557577,0.00010298327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008698678,0.00010748871,0.00010876977,0.00014003864,0.0001954164,0.00016887058,0.000109458975,0.0028292076,0.0000097557395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001168273,0.000062444335,0.0040078396,0.0006101936,0.00005318487,0.000015186739,0.010630418,0.000017025302,8.4639574e-8,0.94371593,0.0010361085,0.039839927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008488269,0.0003054614,0.0031553006,0.00028222165,0.000004811741,0.000074429234,0.0029253196,0.00022559593,0.0000027526346,0.03233525,0.9597026,0.00013742028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036760836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019383573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9586665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017472084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019369376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127009860","doi":"10.1136/jme.2010.036335","title":"Complex calculations: ethical issues in involving at-risk healthy individuals in dementia research","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Wellcome Trust; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Fondation Brocher","keywords":"Dementia; Disease; Context (archaeology); Neuropathology; Vulnerability (computing); Medicine; Psychology; Psychiatry; Pathology; Computer security","score_opus":0.6737257898491676,"score_gpt":0.685518248990132,"score_spread":0.011792459140964384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127009860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55964935,0.0014630636,0.00006813792,0.43760303,0.00040520306,0.0002670124,0.0000035443582,0.0000095229925,0.0005311369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9556087,0.02501061,0.0077934093,0.010451374,0.0009882022,0.0000099315,0.000005783173,0.00003095306,0.00010100084],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9687538,0.0049046995,0.0027856943,0.0004286815,0.022192992,0.00093414437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74294347,0.24095346,0.0012375942,0.0014571536,0.0097897705,0.0036185652],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2834068,0.0001758699,0.00082737696,0.0011323431,0.0003320595,0.00006447523,0.0010133825,0.008004623,0.0020731436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6565507,0.00014103124,0.00018394341,0.0012434715,0.0021222986,0.000112846516,0.00077913265,0.1510211,0.000059729304],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012339137,0.0016068636,0.8582604,0.0015489821,0.00017300338,0.0016650753,0.008994007,0.000020645624,0.001116704,0.11317655,0.008275117,0.003928749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008372686,0.002285884,0.7466739,0.006433463,0.00006678691,0.00040158347,0.0019056292,0.0020668518,0.00015662142,0.19451028,0.036849983,0.00027633307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021527153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07482618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42715165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036825106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0130086355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127275313","doi":"10.1136/jme.27.6.370","title":"Disability and difference: balancing social and physical constructions: Figure 1:","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Neonatal and fetal brain pathology","field":"Medicine","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hospital for Sick Children","funders":"Hospital for Sick Children; Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Splenium; Corpus callosum; Internal capsule; Diffusion MRI; Medicine; White matter; Meta-analysis; MEDLINE; Pediatrics; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Magnetic resonance imaging; Pathology; Radiology; Biology","score_opus":0.09129007158437237,"score_gpt":0.42560087139270286,"score_spread":0.3343107998083305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127275313","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026524158,0.9863966,0.00007538926,0.0100822,0.00040498914,0.00016437774,0.000015832205,0.00000979512,0.00019838355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012036586,0.99571335,0.00013385263,0.0005762222,0.0022813056,0.0000028353857,0.0000075072494,0.0000139145095,0.000067376204],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696666,0.00038797007,0.0007167093,0.00021757,0.0015137634,0.00019731281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99659634,0.0022372804,0.00043111906,0.00010195529,0.00018671324,0.0004465864],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020081191,0.00024267967,0.0019492276,0.00006431942,0.00012924112,0.000018966513,0.00013446833,0.001813124,0.000088259265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056319763,0.00014763053,0.0003332711,0.00015124619,0.0020954527,0.00003868288,0.00012551087,0.008065818,0.000002275781],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022823502,0.00012574357,0.00017985549,0.012980468,0.00011333984,0.00047833822,0.00044125813,1.3639853e-9,6.0300636e-7,0.0010420416,0.00012782062,0.9844877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014188194,0.0005005392,0.0019225494,0.023172056,0.0019074423,0.04321003,0.00037232102,0.0000127018375,2.0659576e-7,0.0046027065,0.92261386,0.00026677773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006579154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004665926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9842209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006563503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012878688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99948275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127586878","doi":"10.1136/jme.2010.039008","title":"Moral experience: a framework for bioethics research","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; McGill University Health Centre; Université de Montréal","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Bioethics; Engineering ethics; Data science; Environmental ethics; Psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.8095381309831641,"score_gpt":0.7185982289166477,"score_spread":0.09093990206651636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127586878","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02041951,0.0016271994,0.2636883,0.66221696,0.017202308,0.0012119584,0.000011898142,0.00009070543,0.033531178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6425785,0.0117144855,0.26687223,0.068028934,0.009763615,0.00014917347,0.0000023139974,0.00010259898,0.0007881667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9704212,0.0131535195,0.0019310795,0.00028644534,0.013170475,0.0010372838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6873544,0.29530606,0.0016242386,0.00082339544,0.012667,0.0022249203],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.23894674,0.00017123645,0.0005262174,0.0002852606,0.0021377453,0.000019769723,0.0018423473,0.008224368,0.0043323915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6916369,0.00012505382,0.00019527922,0.00058588554,0.004347651,0.0002897172,0.0003312795,0.12979853,0.00014587054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038124982,0.00020660715,0.0012453224,0.00054977514,0.00004281865,0.00012801916,0.15766242,1.2088205e-7,0.000006472109,0.82492983,0.013812487,0.0010348558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009676475,0.00061165344,0.00026569248,0.002963037,0.00003324528,0.000048932718,0.08297814,0.00007718141,0.00005406337,0.8364048,0.07546496,0.00013065647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038668513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000192435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.622159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021491201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012690884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99916136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128372335","doi":"10.1136/jme.2009.030460","title":"Expectations regarding cognitive enhancement create substantial challenges","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Clinical Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Warrant; Cognition; Neuroethics; Engineering ethics; Consumption (sociology); Psychology; Data science; Computer science; Business; Neuroscience; Sociology; Social science; Engineering","score_opus":0.2017068309152262,"score_gpt":0.4278642752484084,"score_spread":0.22615744433318222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128372335","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25244555,0.0023754018,0.10009313,0.61071587,0.005068193,0.0006031784,0.000021290121,0.00016808893,0.028509334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9763176,0.009108857,0.00045721038,0.01309026,0.0008363839,0.000004450705,0.0000013339636,0.0000142562185,0.00016967967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99183327,0.0006192637,0.0010939655,0.00033180727,0.0057179816,0.00040373052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99314153,0.0045224996,0.0007332724,0.00019189913,0.0009740744,0.00043670673],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004132908,0.00019840882,0.0003677172,0.00032116158,0.00036280084,0.00007447808,0.0006660499,0.00059992145,0.0006693645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054559957,0.00016535538,0.00015022182,0.0005023482,0.00076051045,0.0003129006,0.000073586125,0.0049498333,0.000051394087],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005168552,0.0027956036,0.000011791797,0.00022959903,0.00013889463,0.002494766,0.031966664,0.000007003627,0.27965188,0.57554597,0.0048916647,0.10174932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0072199386,0.0041622403,0.0004896946,0.004135305,0.00022587154,0.00095110515,0.008682387,0.00044216684,0.8504106,0.09821396,0.024144575,0.00092215464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001860554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000105225145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.723872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008595746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010758301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128372426","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2014-102458","title":"Treatment-resistant major depressive disorder and assisted dying","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Depression (economics); Psychiatry; Medicine; Major depressive disorder; Treatment-resistant depression; Assisted suicide; Depressive symptoms; Resistance (ecology); Psychology; Anxiety","score_opus":0.24582432710999894,"score_gpt":0.5381148908575125,"score_spread":0.2922905637475136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128372426","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008379276,0.9913094,0.00025813072,0.004838679,0.0024020511,0.00023955035,0.000029781775,0.000014591423,0.00082399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00011324058,0.9979538,0.00022494557,0.00023228176,0.0009778627,0.000011779377,0.000009833201,0.000048578633,0.00042770684],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992045,0.0024419266,0.001676496,0.00033338508,0.0030981957,0.0004050151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900162,0.006439642,0.0014794419,0.00036328734,0.0006109318,0.0010904775],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006772601,0.0003899186,0.002186579,0.00030365982,0.00016960918,0.00006021648,0.00055495824,0.004220755,0.00042908522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009791026,0.0002183329,0.00045765468,0.00022568012,0.0003143036,0.000037936818,0.00009171562,0.006895288,0.000049405604],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049434384,0.00017677898,0.0000022220202,0.0022945097,0.00055905053,0.011778677,0.0011283468,4.3477172e-8,1.7886608e-8,0.00017964265,0.0006329035,0.98319834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014674064,0.00047459418,0.000022295595,0.02186899,0.00081258075,0.013369269,0.0005525073,0.0000015592357,6.2685768e-9,0.00030440843,0.9609345,0.00019185539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019467305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009380833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98300654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024552568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006877341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128558490","doi":"10.1136/jme.2009.031609","title":"Children in health research: a matter of trust","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Children's Rights and Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Qualitative research; Perception; Grounded theory; Psychology; Focus group; Developmental psychology; Medicine; Social psychology; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.2347070423009294,"score_gpt":0.5205682558819426,"score_spread":0.28586121358101313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128558490","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7599469,0.00006929747,0.000046392925,0.23756823,0.00039371403,0.00007013682,0.0000012486779,0.000001890852,0.0019021888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99657303,0.0005565941,0.00021345154,0.0015547955,0.0009827489,4.8585724e-7,5.308645e-7,0.0000034020993,0.00011495517],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940818,0.0011291323,0.00056104205,0.00006427172,0.003915348,0.00024841807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771017,0.0012071452,0.00025317445,0.000081865546,0.00040167588,0.00034598404],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.040692907,0.000037769758,0.000175486,0.00016432202,0.000176377,0.000023682538,0.00034979527,0.00046955465,0.0014818197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0090235565,0.000025730624,0.000051413965,0.00028355618,0.0007082083,0.00009231557,0.000028667593,0.0048213326,0.000013096676],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000117699026,0.00085817336,0.35344854,0.00013203337,0.00004904646,0.00003780326,0.2544201,0.000010887773,0.0000829713,0.3405189,0.030273447,0.020050399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018730669,0.0004263959,0.8014725,0.0010057056,0.000010811392,0.000051819094,0.0037530886,0.00007491538,0.00010208209,0.06236099,0.12870994,0.0001586641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009235819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037581958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44802397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037618844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036142545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129225996","doi":"10.1136/jme.28.3.170","title":"Neuromuscular blockers—a means of palliation?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Anesthesia and Sedative Agents","field":"Medicine","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Sedation; Intensive care medicine; Respiratory distress; Distress; Respiratory failure; Anesthesia; Psychology","score_opus":0.09181111426045808,"score_gpt":0.3594016078649019,"score_spread":0.2675904936044438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129225996","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002811984,0.000929378,0.00080734876,0.9942755,0.00054713653,0.0001231087,0.0000039140937,0.000007885933,0.00049376267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00426115,0.005610312,0.0011052045,0.98043835,0.0066796765,0.0000013208758,0.000032606655,0.000053575604,0.0018177993],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98939484,0.0005391347,0.0011420959,0.00016975727,0.008507349,0.0002468386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955758,0.0014315556,0.0010712835,0.00029508097,0.0013154597,0.0003108556],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032810173,0.00023496202,0.0009980453,0.00024310645,0.000044420318,0.00001013869,0.0004710228,0.0039315196,0.0022775205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008538999,0.00016497112,0.0005728075,0.00017870871,0.00032820163,0.000044342145,0.000040522762,0.01759041,0.000030499614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004156993,0.00015769764,0.001132589,0.0010435132,0.00042446447,0.013374785,0.0008995781,0.0000016703445,0.00001455809,0.000056942466,0.98211175,0.0007408544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014516754,0.00067656225,0.0012320757,0.0022713745,0.00073690596,0.0012794611,0.00006547041,0.00019310102,0.000040229545,0.00015517464,0.99176157,0.00013638065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014176466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000017651888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013837126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006222104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016073823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129438997","doi":"10.1136/jme.2010.042002","title":"Informed consent for clinical trials of deep brain stimulation in psychiatric disease: challenges and implications for trial design: Table 1","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Neurological disorders and treatments","field":"Medicine","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto General Hospital; Toronto Western Hospital; University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Deep brain stimulation; Clinical trial; Informed consent; Context (archaeology); Psychiatry; Medicine; Population; Voluntariness; Disease; Psychology; Alternative medicine; Pathology","score_opus":0.633094903216267,"score_gpt":0.5565160375990146,"score_spread":0.07657886561725247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129438997","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29481882,0.044095717,0.17832345,0.47005722,0.0019718788,0.010320182,0.000100031815,0.000028705623,0.0002839941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9132963,0.06617432,0.015535869,0.004336477,0.0004949388,0.00011857817,0.000013667265,0.000016056716,0.000013808522],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704707,0.0005422444,0.0016438211,0.00012554805,0.00050101505,0.0001402874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96016014,0.03816927,0.00083088776,0.00011313174,0.00032927436,0.00039727965],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013964181,0.000091683585,0.0006993816,0.00011946635,0.000037189933,0.000004043825,0.00009056577,0.00048797156,0.000031645992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16084069,0.000058437607,0.00024780008,0.00007525238,0.00014858267,0.00004712173,0.000016431206,0.0005781625,1.7517732e-7],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"randomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.51223093,0.013438825,0.029595489,0.0033737635,0.0009939973,0.000052732023,0.0026743126,0.000027491533,0.000026012742,0.032842945,0.009256881,0.3954866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.34143156,0.031248556,0.3027887,0.00076583534,0.001617624,0.000036507074,0.00036734634,0.0017451118,0.000017048682,0.3169931,0.002759134,0.00022947916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003375104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053302152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61847746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014646404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002060878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8462279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129750793","doi":"10.1136/jme.2006.018903","title":"Rights, responsibilities and NICE: a rejoinder to Harris","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Work & Health","funders":"","keywords":"Nice; Excellence; Quality-adjusted life year; Actuarial science; Health care rationing; Health care; Outcome (game theory); Inference; Cost effectiveness; Medicine; Operations research; Psychology; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Law; Risk analysis (engineering); Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.4641587539012373,"score_gpt":0.5316572827084718,"score_spread":0.0674985288072345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129750793","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38729444,0.0048198244,0.025891777,0.5767528,0.0017016222,0.00024349893,0.000028936975,0.000018357385,0.0032487574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8168495,0.0013279457,0.018425705,0.158581,0.00298049,0.000006143559,0.0000023751634,0.000039522332,0.0017872709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931379,0.0005120577,0.0048375875,0.00026107143,0.00088714313,0.00036424756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98634475,0.010066903,0.001935981,0.00029697095,0.0003691788,0.0009862359],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19752741,0.00012766909,0.00080710143,0.0004798115,0.00018829155,0.000063976964,0.00035342007,0.0007939761,0.00074033934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.092252225,0.00012632401,0.00010997198,0.00017821949,0.00019448045,0.00027836024,0.000076423814,0.0020037603,0.00023584825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032774574,0.00020672123,0.015316456,0.0007737036,0.00020145235,0.0001068362,0.038243446,0.000020875439,0.000006794479,0.75940216,0.18425229,0.0011414955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015717951,0.00041351272,0.026432985,0.00066966214,0.000013294758,0.00028777012,0.0047985106,0.00026693725,0.00002060353,0.12946004,0.8357361,0.00032880023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004818202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007818192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6514838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003112696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010384757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9153941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129751575","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2013-101765","title":"Implementation of a consent for chart review and contact and its impact in one clinical centre","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Chart; Medicine; Confidentiality; Family medicine; Patient Consent; Pediatrics; Alternative medicine; Computer science; Pathology","score_opus":0.6954082525909889,"score_gpt":0.7188436600817371,"score_spread":0.023435407490748128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129751575","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50372005,0.018939165,0.0005238091,0.47568247,0.00019781284,0.00082116795,0.000015903199,0.0000037662633,0.00009585646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72335815,0.26748106,0.0005357171,0.00834928,0.0002405483,0.0000019308309,0.0000023183063,0.000008372565,0.00002261615],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945089,0.00075999205,0.0017190736,0.00015291692,0.0026537573,0.00020535967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9068014,0.088736,0.0008798383,0.0001930469,0.0023578033,0.0010318974],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.070269644,0.00008835237,0.0008624985,0.00008581206,0.00002533686,0.000007814608,0.00012718364,0.00091401266,0.00026732366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27561495,0.000060792274,0.00015928027,0.00008405884,0.00027772924,0.00004573921,0.00007695807,0.005831922,9.761284e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0046724034,0.0033515724,0.57364523,0.13873622,0.001789615,0.00027531327,0.0045990897,4.5271258e-7,0.0013765881,0.11618257,0.016579162,0.1387918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.06620728,0.028422277,0.68270284,0.14197756,0.0025842623,0.0011000542,0.0027661682,0.0011808658,0.0010039913,0.05102422,0.020435397,0.00059507356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006693529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000715267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4673332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004258664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041261245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129896353","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2012-100903","title":"Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of a family booklet on comfort care in dementia: sensitive topics revised before implementation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Palliative care; Dementia; Adaptation (eye); Typology; Psychology; Nursing; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.24612833781069438,"score_gpt":0.527552916957521,"score_spread":0.28142457914682667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129896353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99048656,0.0046936185,0.0012462982,0.003045526,0.00015154995,0.00013369878,0.000009534127,0.0000023139341,0.00023092597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99454534,0.0026479943,0.0018949566,0.00062734383,0.00024458684,9.2227447e-7,0.000031139898,0.0000044932376,0.0000032374246],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979625,0.0001257942,0.00056282716,0.000055774795,0.0011846933,0.000108437926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985865,0.00026629938,0.00030960902,0.000044342498,0.0006725638,0.000120692705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015307217,0.000074741074,0.0002830621,0.00008778296,0.00002543188,0.000005400875,0.000036042507,0.00027005625,0.000016920107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00087984104,0.0000548188,0.00006963723,0.0000818957,0.00013065217,0.00016807002,0.00000844302,0.0007343498,1.9898164e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009900854,0.00019249029,0.4434688,0.0015155335,0.0002887606,0.00005617562,0.23603925,0.000051755524,0.0012110147,0.0019320106,0.00014688904,0.3141072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015807323,0.0040102974,0.77895826,0.010351322,0.0007470129,0.00010703275,0.15252429,0.001317695,0.01051614,0.00025911623,0.025153961,0.0002475192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000100780635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021219144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33548945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057462566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002807366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31904253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130064529","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2013-101572","title":"Consensus standards for introductory e-learning courses in human participants research ethics","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Radiology practices and education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Biotika; University of Ottawa","funders":"Fogarty International Center","keywords":"Medical education; Research ethics; Ethical standards; Process (computing); Engineering ethics; Psychology; Computer science; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.3592936525969912,"score_gpt":0.5873955597745074,"score_spread":0.22810190717751622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130064529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6833214,0.00062702957,0.00012151432,0.3145592,0.0007114296,0.00019967779,0.000001019544,0.0000061386563,0.00045254716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99332017,0.0017311631,0.00083112955,0.0020278678,0.0018007058,0.00001208649,0.0000030433594,0.000014843728,0.00025899327],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993058,0.001723355,0.000738564,0.00015003739,0.0038836154,0.00044639572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9705465,0.02064258,0.0005330976,0.00023629532,0.007260048,0.0007814955],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07145562,0.00008797288,0.00038270644,0.00026256923,0.00026046822,0.0000364701,0.00018828301,0.0012303126,0.0007230631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2439045,0.00006616422,0.000075259435,0.00018505249,0.00074075593,0.000097620206,0.000035214278,0.015966104,0.000007460595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041418453,0.0039304807,0.18106815,0.004923699,0.0011637581,0.0011802247,0.1342982,0.00040656741,0.016864872,0.044337276,0.55852,0.049164925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012586747,0.0084459,0.06552495,0.004538187,0.00041140808,0.002120965,0.07135409,0.0031813818,0.0011492489,0.017353935,0.8128716,0.00046159068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024280496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010504278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31253135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025559575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010752812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131882480","doi":"10.1136/jme.2004.010629","title":"Informing research participants of research results: analysis of Canadian university based research ethics board policies","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Bioethics Society; Izaak Walton Killam Health Centre; Dalhousie University","funders":"IWK Health Centre; Dalhousie University","keywords":"Research ethics; Statement (logic); Human research; Ethics committee; Inclusion (mineral); Ethical issues; Public relations; Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Engineering ethics; Law; Public administration; Social psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.8928774793116917,"score_gpt":0.701927032105675,"score_spread":0.19095044720601673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131882480","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35248083,0.00055425504,0.0001116612,0.62913835,0.00016969822,0.0004302759,0.00010124284,0.000012819774,0.017000863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784848,0.015489476,0.0025680892,0.0012946122,0.0005951675,0.0000017423181,0.000011030539,0.000028621585,0.0015264482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9074804,0.014551016,0.003970646,0.0006545807,0.07046504,0.0028782927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.34725738,0.53599226,0.0011988172,0.002588999,0.10552293,0.007439635],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.53708416,0.00020017238,0.0013641127,0.01749954,0.0009086462,0.000060751365,0.002584099,0.005914868,0.0006551828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7848092,0.00016859008,0.00058214396,0.019516299,0.01065204,0.0002431487,0.0008105781,0.091643736,0.000023870627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.033901047,0.008049227,0.08247043,0.01604562,0.013547419,0.009203667,0.22086377,0.0050783316,0.004810358,0.4889208,0.09554043,0.021568896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.023535786,0.016676687,0.08216848,0.040344518,0.0028570334,0.00014709937,0.14911838,0.031126952,0.01836242,0.023094626,0.61144143,0.00112657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21562426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65769035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62784374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016307795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13468708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99537563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132587765","doi":"10.1136/jme.2010.036715","title":"Developing registries of volunteers: key principles to manage issues regarding personal information protection: Figure 1","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; McGill University","funders":"Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec","keywords":"Confidentiality; Normative; Key (lock); Task (project management); Internet privacy; Computer science; Computer security; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.4183001632165106,"score_gpt":0.5433828386533576,"score_spread":0.12508267543684698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132587765","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2194368,0.00027915867,0.034024894,0.74049205,0.0014788664,0.000586013,0.000004898738,0.00003412733,0.0036632058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8963534,0.0054776403,0.08134109,0.010277026,0.0033798967,0.000023064507,0.000007674528,0.000036794074,0.0031034022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98971117,0.00016773817,0.0012868459,0.00012858138,0.008455523,0.00025016896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864401,0.00611246,0.0006343641,0.00030525966,0.0058609922,0.0006468032],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03097599,0.0001244643,0.0004510387,0.00030552957,0.00013779264,0.00005816836,0.00048296177,0.001990365,0.00034682485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.388631,0.00009276159,0.00017151462,0.00038204083,0.0005506318,0.00033060706,0.00021498965,0.01734616,0.00002520335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0048473505,0.00062480074,0.009533074,0.026961423,0.0012101596,0.00092318386,0.10802168,0.0000640595,0.005379177,0.7465925,0.013403983,0.082438596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025537936,0.0015481849,0.006042647,0.01439154,0.0001070312,0.000981833,0.0069936328,0.0008691825,0.005733589,0.012937792,0.9475646,0.00027616275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010694982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048177832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93416065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011961798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057822037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132840591","doi":"10.1136/jme.2006.017038","title":"Withholding and withdrawing life support in critical care settings: ethical issues concerning consent","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Bioethics; Informed consent; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Psychological intervention; Intervention (counseling); Life support; Social psychology; Medicine; Nursing; Law; Political science; Psychiatry; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.5005070038367924,"score_gpt":0.6129180606156864,"score_spread":0.11241105677889407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132840591","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018664237,0.98225355,0.00032808693,0.015884427,0.0005848983,0.00020367917,0.0000092670125,0.000014256421,0.0005351644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010765268,0.98901826,0.0035453509,0.004803722,0.001467222,0.0000027889796,0.0000141369865,0.00004913377,0.000022876518],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.991289,0.000861879,0.0024977676,0.00034299365,0.004528669,0.00047964245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9780205,0.017987126,0.0010241321,0.00022666872,0.0014968864,0.0012447155],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013173979,0.00043218985,0.0035741082,0.0005129074,0.000079829864,0.0000368407,0.00032021184,0.0048356093,0.00018338507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12798776,0.00031146122,0.00047470842,0.00034727855,0.0012927518,0.00007505157,0.00017042215,0.020515978,0.0000041859294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003342849,0.00025132755,0.0038690476,0.33267906,0.00096735347,0.018283352,0.055593282,0.0000012927273,0.0000031080444,0.003611643,0.0059827333,0.5784235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092798995,0.00045288895,0.000010475744,0.26801193,0.00090390147,0.0015413654,0.0075175054,0.0000060720495,0.000005141548,0.0000349645,0.72037965,0.00020809226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007202507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000040080842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71439695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002347536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011090429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134076687","doi":"10.1136/jme.2006.019406","title":"Beyond informed consent: the therapeutic misconception and trust","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Confusion; Focus (optics); Psychology; Empirical research; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Epistemology; Pathology","score_opus":0.5748861720246976,"score_gpt":0.5940177070717441,"score_spread":0.019131535047046455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134076687","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.418405,0.0043433276,0.00074907264,0.5667548,0.0007003978,0.00020997504,0.0000014439001,0.0000134185275,0.008822562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86570454,0.10257638,0.00043387385,0.029495994,0.0007924392,0.0000014703022,7.5903034e-7,0.000010552514,0.0009840041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99146,0.00034856878,0.00078114093,0.000104492305,0.0070845815,0.00022116643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8947325,0.10155595,0.00042930574,0.00034843647,0.0020537707,0.0008800356],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020386493,0.00009600323,0.0003188298,0.0000771487,0.00022997899,0.000020859263,0.0003275875,0.0015870825,0.000505837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2164008,0.00005033081,0.00013496092,0.00015186406,0.0029598074,0.00006978733,0.000097994365,0.016045298,0.00001533854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0054243216,0.0020942842,0.11415857,0.0066897003,0.0021403295,0.0073804497,0.093293466,0.000012602917,0.001869849,0.6266935,0.043337576,0.096905336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.030842505,0.009520506,0.23215286,0.01282384,0.00091724057,0.055163313,0.0161855,0.0013211746,0.0012959925,0.43254673,0.20643082,0.00079950393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035114543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038152377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5372588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005707059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01577297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134896416","doi":"10.1136/jme.2009.032466","title":"Off-trial access to experimental cancer agents for the terminally ill: balancing the needs of individuals and society","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Clinical trial; Medicine; Cancer; Terminal cancer; Drug development; Cancer drugs; Research ethics; Intensive care medicine; Drug; Psychiatry; Pathology; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.4570225426018613,"score_gpt":0.639356942577845,"score_spread":0.18233439997598372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134896416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7114422,0.0006219019,0.00041068942,0.28515023,0.0016433779,0.00059831375,0.000009608355,0.0000035094322,0.000120177574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96367055,0.0035882548,0.00087500917,0.029133935,0.0025236118,0.00003165977,4.1831152e-7,0.000015817937,0.00016071777],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927852,0.00017537814,0.00085551816,0.000117468335,0.0058007794,0.00026565275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95463055,0.042295422,0.00044166096,0.0003060505,0.0017989917,0.0005273068],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.036994766,0.00011272825,0.0003929346,0.00006106686,0.00022457667,0.00007152548,0.0010458783,0.0012533013,0.00027367272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12172473,0.0000536553,0.000275439,0.00020145545,0.0009861186,0.000079038204,0.00048878504,0.011543393,6.0729315e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.050095916,0.0045903916,0.08895915,0.0066349236,0.0067111594,0.0002181836,0.3237676,0.00005668077,0.04395957,0.058825806,0.22459307,0.19158752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.2230128,0.02170154,0.14157763,0.017312016,0.0032338912,0.001204248,0.09423152,0.004063508,0.058018554,0.024743555,0.4095393,0.0013614313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008042145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021004042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2560163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004390882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049428176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99161655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135451924","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2012-100793","title":"A child born with Edward's syndrome: the legal and moral duty to accede to the request for parentage determination","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Regent College","funders":"","keywords":"Suspect; Duty; Test (biology); Obligation; Subject (documents); Reproduction; Genetic testing; Medicine; Law; Moral obligation; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Genetics; Biology","score_opus":0.04516538986021226,"score_gpt":0.3963196126767226,"score_spread":0.3511542228165103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135451924","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18325017,0.0006058696,0.004564774,0.8098561,0.000500439,0.0008374798,0.000006867369,0.000009639652,0.00036865953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9512942,0.0006022911,0.0028448615,0.043560106,0.0015075605,0.00004137606,0.0000025527183,0.000018695373,0.00012835671],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963631,0.00022597366,0.00053216086,0.00015782437,0.0024371806,0.00028375015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99594414,0.0017436517,0.00020690587,0.00024906342,0.0010825171,0.0007737116],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007113788,0.00013724096,0.00032540897,0.00008604637,0.00030938216,0.00011524051,0.00036553392,0.0005190869,0.00006928424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010950475,0.00006085471,0.000077050005,0.00021036017,0.00018729524,0.00013651252,0.00009314166,0.004410605,0.000007413693],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004117174,0.0016498865,0.04075255,0.0070551517,0.0011054598,0.0049606976,0.14673974,0.00013408183,0.000117862735,0.10035139,0.19333273,0.4996833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004776066,0.011688252,0.094308995,0.0046777176,0.00062441826,0.019353608,0.0088174315,0.0016345116,0.000106290354,0.0035588522,0.8499239,0.00052994885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006626473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76804405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006908015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012861199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99788624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136409336","doi":"10.1136/jme.2011.043042","title":"From genomic databases to translation: a call to action","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Translation (biology); Action (physics); Data sharing; Data science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Medicine; Biology; Genetics; Pathology","score_opus":0.14110658311280802,"score_gpt":0.3823597104208603,"score_spread":0.2412531273080523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136409336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87516284,0.0010211617,0.108217165,0.013716967,0.0012914622,0.00009883121,0.00007752573,0.000003388843,0.00041064594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9562022,0.002903348,0.024397565,0.013032708,0.0033650736,0.0000033815284,0.000035458565,0.000019224957,0.000041019237],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884695,0.000052018764,0.00029024482,0.00012498099,0.0005721525,0.000113655755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990334,0.00012964003,0.0000883408,0.00015790407,0.00019207592,0.00039864186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009151592,0.000073713716,0.0001242534,0.000042297856,0.00003383917,0.000010788756,0.00024443053,0.0002806847,0.00017557853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018134394,0.00006543363,0.000067771616,0.000049908464,0.000032462878,0.0000031577347,0.0000692226,0.0005222361,0.000016297676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002942347,0.000689812,0.002135811,0.00010401971,0.00051103794,0.00031068834,0.017394233,0.0004488012,0.65260553,0.0011873126,0.13906482,0.1826056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010876809,0.0009846304,0.0040383297,0.00015507113,0.00007920978,0.0000884225,0.00045788332,0.00004606833,0.058986697,0.00043496088,0.9333971,0.0002439085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041915962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012116595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7943323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020954714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007819184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26683062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137034258","doi":"10.1136/jme.2003.005702","title":"Biomedical conflicts of interest: a defence of the sequestration thesis—learning from the cases of Nancy Olivieri and David Healy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":154,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Political science; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Management; Economics; Engineering; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.7297793189986983,"score_gpt":0.601639539662305,"score_spread":0.1281397793363933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137034258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.927951,0.0028820515,0.00018296616,0.06815933,0.0005920991,0.00012598833,0.0000319194,0.0000042696206,0.000070415124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910458,0.0045948625,0.000090372945,0.003946472,0.000304886,0.0000014915071,0.0000019862282,0.0000065305526,0.0000076321685],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958143,0.0018400301,0.001003368,0.00011258788,0.0010189747,0.00021072342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99144477,0.0066690347,0.0008861803,0.00012820883,0.0004662979,0.00040548926],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006590528,0.00012416599,0.00039747392,0.000043855616,0.00016619588,0.0000063924554,0.00053561694,0.001317403,0.00025851902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0120814005,0.0000692502,0.0001273038,0.00020169377,0.0019558282,0.000074638054,0.00012741188,0.00829042,8.655633e-7],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007442224,0.0064870147,0.22080527,0.0069994624,0.0034871772,0.0017810846,0.17366628,0.0018603452,0.23857485,0.17239131,0.0027491087,0.16375586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.023529874,0.008764164,0.1573078,0.02402804,0.0035127238,0.004626417,0.024302615,0.004286541,0.5327624,0.05970357,0.15600732,0.0011685238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002668526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010616403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29418758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036183872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019040141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138473831","doi":"10.1136/jme.2005.012807","title":"Review of a mock research protocol in functional neuroimaging by Canadian research ethics boards","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Protocol (science); Research ethics; Mandate; Neuroimaging; Computer science; Interpretation (philosophy); Engineering ethics; Psychology; Medicine; Psychiatry; Alternative medicine; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.7251247044649617,"score_gpt":0.6418003750010972,"score_spread":0.08332432946386448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138473831","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[6.1614344e-7,0.8535198,0.000120952594,0.11832939,0.0010057122,0.023756376,0.00012204231,0.000018107625,0.0031270226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000043735295,0.9827349,0.00008597814,0.010763727,0.00086166535,0.0049462193,0.000020339261,0.00009118245,0.0004915873],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9364443,0.023713032,0.005653849,0.001057204,0.031415768,0.0017158628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9417465,0.04613989,0.0021264283,0.0010116538,0.0074905474,0.0014849881],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14971472,0.00050602964,0.002285937,0.0036883429,0.00066404307,0.00014881183,0.0035222152,0.0038361312,0.0010500237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3735344,0.00040798506,0.0005246603,0.007218374,0.0051274253,0.0002620391,0.0006984145,0.10180784,0.00006185518],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031899566,0.00080190535,0.0000021732255,0.3256183,0.000038876053,0.0013482568,0.0003731471,8.092944e-7,0.00010221797,0.013219635,0.55187225,0.10659054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041674118,0.00024155926,9.981076e-7,0.21340032,0.00003591657,0.00028643335,0.000021251062,0.000008719332,0.000036538895,0.0025872416,0.78275555,0.00020871201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068316474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006670653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23088333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014223086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08198986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138988016","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2012-100746","title":"Reporting of patient consent in healthcare cluster randomised trials is associated with the type of study interventions and publication characteristics","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Ottawa Hospital; University of Calgary","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Informed consent; Psychological intervention; Family medicine; Medicine; Research ethics; Cluster (spacecraft); CRTS; Health care; MEDLINE; Alternative medicine; Nursing; Psychiatry; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.7520368712069652,"score_gpt":0.6595263201889944,"score_spread":0.09251055101797079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138988016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8394879,0.0004541113,0.00011638194,0.15916342,0.00017916734,0.000562534,0.0000037720688,0.0000017563177,0.000030945823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99668413,0.0011429075,0.00012461646,0.00189586,0.00010167197,0.000005406679,0.0000031069392,0.0000073919664,0.000034894256],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853241,0.0034487208,0.005945558,0.00010815831,0.0049725063,0.00020094322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.56061465,0.35400337,0.04690741,0.0013741461,0.035161708,0.00193872],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19559959,0.00007278093,0.0009831975,0.00013315184,0.000042116535,0.000010793522,0.0001381552,0.00063829357,0.0000783829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8061554,0.000037751608,0.00016188664,0.0002677898,0.0003918715,0.000049088274,0.000092673356,0.00565149,2.645196e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012694038,0.006133481,0.9278086,0.0035706994,0.0012633627,0.00009049324,0.03888679,7.660149e-7,0.00014125064,0.0019219429,0.0016297173,0.0058588632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.069235995,0.012882165,0.86468536,0.030299582,0.0013617673,0.00033724195,0.01777362,0.00019674421,0.00037117643,0.002188285,0.00045169462,0.00021637187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000102890794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003919804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6105558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006894585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034515327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99664253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139335589","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2012-101129","title":"Is it ethical to invite compatible pairs to participate in exchange programmes?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Disadvantage; Distributive justice; Transplantation; Equity (law); Donation; Economic Justice; Medicine; Organ donation; Kidney donation; Affect (linguistics); Kidney transplantation; Psychology; Political science; Internal medicine; Law","score_opus":0.14535412821692775,"score_gpt":0.4417051809426528,"score_spread":0.29635105272572504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139335589","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2806371,0.000046173514,0.0032416817,0.7152589,0.00021691233,0.00029916794,0.0000016418628,0.000011166572,0.00028730824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8240978,0.00025074993,0.0018085184,0.17347047,0.00022176614,0.000014733014,0.0000027525616,0.000011158638,0.00012205544],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959001,0.00022394132,0.00067838375,0.00012637264,0.0028073627,0.00026384302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974991,0.0005946908,0.00011694133,0.000110164074,0.0006229233,0.001056146],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004522926,0.00010536633,0.00032826042,0.00028076587,0.000035715566,0.000033684602,0.00015788496,0.00081191794,0.0029148085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004298027,0.00007935856,0.00007699613,0.00044707733,0.00007231855,0.00007725401,0.000029460312,0.003908019,0.00030015776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016539543,0.0030813238,0.12415544,0.003603695,0.0003990872,0.0023032376,0.30538407,0.00011089423,0.0028760647,0.0039995867,0.37873712,0.17369555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017384076,0.006717871,0.5541666,0.010891987,0.00036751953,0.0011252679,0.0072138016,0.00463039,0.0075412686,0.0028590183,0.3862702,0.0008319709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021802796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00087216636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5434607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006880345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060411094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139704368","doi":"10.1136/jme.2008.026351","title":"Just compassion: implications for the ethics of the scarcity paradigm in clinical healthcare provision","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Clinical Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Compassion; Rationing; Economic Justice; Scarcity; Health care; Distributive justice; Vulnerability (computing); Virtue; Dilemma; Sociology; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Public relations; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Economics","score_opus":0.48851720182340796,"score_gpt":0.6628437205305475,"score_spread":0.17432651870713955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139704368","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063306573,0.0011699751,0.015560309,0.972294,0.0032519845,0.0009886418,0.000013342153,0.000012570233,0.00037853105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8818355,0.0072487565,0.0015639752,0.107562244,0.0017049871,0.000022530769,0.0000018742057,0.00001577661,0.00004432667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9709993,0.019046614,0.0038623402,0.00026889986,0.005274139,0.0005486838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7004325,0.29071575,0.0035251118,0.0010705307,0.0034632182,0.00079287926],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1801015,0.00016985984,0.0006752524,0.000088369896,0.0019617418,0.000013121185,0.0019788337,0.0044617155,0.0000866203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.42885047,0.00008444553,0.00037105006,0.00053605397,0.0014529107,0.00014235702,0.0002642999,0.08234945,0.0000054004427],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005694013,0.00088488497,0.030968286,0.0013349283,0.000063901745,0.000009776624,0.018118912,0.000029853703,0.000016832399,0.87566257,0.03937333,0.032967325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035120156,0.0008283907,0.43838257,0.0065965587,0.00016937061,0.00006572056,0.00746669,0.0010985361,0.0000072731546,0.41299644,0.1286951,0.00018134886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020412251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012936249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87550485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020333902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017434902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139924880","doi":"10.1136/jme.2006.016444","title":"Refuting the net risks test: a response to Wendler and Miller’s “Assessing research risks systematically”","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Harm; Clinical equipoise; Miller; Research ethics; Test (biology); Psychological intervention; Risk analysis (engineering); Component (thermodynamics); Engineering ethics; Duty; Clinical trial; Psychology; Medicine; Actuarial science; Political science; Business; Law; Social psychology; Engineering; Biology; Pathology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.835670536432955,"score_gpt":0.7275577684054344,"score_spread":0.10811276802752057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139924880","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50976616,0.0019148309,0.0070279157,0.4771201,0.0005898912,0.0005662506,0.000001975673,0.000022652697,0.0029902025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790149,0.003104485,0.0074375584,0.008098817,0.0016854481,0.0000051532297,3.1741925e-7,0.00004086676,0.0006124714],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9555735,0.006455775,0.0034574026,0.0005543684,0.03252887,0.0014301039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.17130543,0.81043994,0.0008659166,0.0013065753,0.012097753,0.0039843684],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5383564,0.00020282493,0.0007731317,0.0005431366,0.0006955789,0.00023668853,0.0010537533,0.003034408,0.000227264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.88559175,0.000114516806,0.00019475169,0.001018736,0.0020217644,0.00011336989,0.0007920508,0.04829191,0.000041435727],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.06583931,0.008968503,0.18896459,0.046687253,0.0034551113,0.06665679,0.12724693,0.00010706293,0.049804214,0.1300232,0.09319382,0.21905321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.019116916,0.01954498,0.46268907,0.17307629,0.00095541193,0.02061041,0.07208174,0.0053636166,0.0023983223,0.10523236,0.11745066,0.0014802313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016548809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003248642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80398417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033254863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009783038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99825984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140434392","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2014-102078","title":"Acknowledging awareness: informing families of individual research results for patients in the vegetative state","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Management of metastatic bone disease","field":"Medicine","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Endometrial cancer; Adjuvant; Internal medicine; Adjuvant therapy; Serous carcinoma; Hysterectomy; Cohort; Stage (stratigraphy); Carcinoma; Serous fluid; Obstetrics and gynaecology; Multivariate analysis; Cancer; Oncology; Gynecology; Gastroenterology; Surgery; Ovarian cancer; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.14500967071189239,"score_gpt":0.46351926429470036,"score_spread":0.31850959358280795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140434392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96751386,0.00019940357,0.004457322,0.02420248,0.00044184373,0.0007445644,0.000031808697,0.000006038279,0.0024026565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958253,0.00047156023,0.0019223726,0.0015337995,0.00016792938,0.000010265896,0.000017970773,0.000010363086,0.000040465122],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906494,0.00094163144,0.0011296343,0.00011747788,0.0068729743,0.00028890977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983496,0.012679822,0.00062419195,0.00025624805,0.0026877199,0.0002560021],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.053816564,0.00010403549,0.00040190775,0.0004730412,0.00009465596,0.00002718762,0.0005650631,0.00020431151,0.000010932187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1333444,0.00006293258,0.0001138889,0.00039006848,0.00039835792,0.00013663518,0.00013300654,0.0025660414,0.0000025304107],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011244629,0.005828351,0.056655433,0.013732285,0.001140144,0.00033631237,0.42397887,0.00020803873,0.00002910025,0.017719861,0.042634536,0.42649245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.093055114,0.0160947,0.5361847,0.024916425,0.0012597546,0.000067104455,0.12376323,0.013736136,0.0005778465,0.051965,0.13763478,0.00074515765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031008265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007774496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47952932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004548757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015911678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140542250","doi":"10.1136/jme.2003.006247","title":"Therapeutic optimism in the consent forms of phase 1 gene transfer trials: an empirical analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; McGill University","keywords":"Optimism; Terminology; Informed consent; Psychology; Clinical trial; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Family medicine; Psychotherapist; Pathology","score_opus":0.8166840657639511,"score_gpt":0.7094448661430883,"score_spread":0.10723919962086281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140542250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49183998,0.0018374905,0.041266732,0.4642415,0.00013673323,0.0002879212,0.000008292997,0.0000063609364,0.00037500684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9602815,0.014531203,0.0021579394,0.022260861,0.0007099268,0.000003916191,0.0000047410244,0.00001337845,0.000036552156],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9800456,0.0043384624,0.0031061128,0.0002268076,0.011917415,0.00036560086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84881467,0.14694451,0.0005217982,0.000704439,0.002056474,0.00095811725],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2064569,0.00015713653,0.0013731921,0.000450383,0.00006274997,0.000026968264,0.0008607182,0.0021948002,0.0010781075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18359533,0.000078030265,0.0008711109,0.0008978983,0.0010030621,0.0000964397,0.00004062899,0.01684798,0.0000037395912],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.04361576,0.086852565,0.027962282,0.0045523923,0.027875805,0.008802867,0.18020321,0.0035692812,0.017782476,0.12220406,0.0056181285,0.47096118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.25632727,0.06840869,0.034242645,0.010293794,0.04452725,0.007330091,0.038322918,0.13658887,0.032831922,0.27236778,0.09617704,0.0025817272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000034331173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010654668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46844152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096303076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00812211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140644024","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2015-102663","title":"Research led by participants: a new social contract for a new kind of research","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Mental Health and Patient Involvement","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Wellcome Trust; Kaiser Permanente; Biogen; AstraZeneca; Sanofi; Robert Wood Johnson Foundation","keywords":"Public relations; Social contract; Work (physics); Social enterprise; Business; Political science; Law; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.9154554705388616,"score_gpt":0.7301121433476447,"score_spread":0.18534332719121682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140644024","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4329194,0.005171076,0.0045532202,0.54444176,0.0052938387,0.0033600195,0.00009163126,0.000022467373,0.004146584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9680252,0.0016142665,0.001862668,0.012730065,0.009428051,0.00007040042,0.00004186985,0.00005072472,0.0061767213],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9813006,0.0052581197,0.0017808109,0.00016279434,0.010245547,0.0012521294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9754874,0.01624714,0.00063599955,0.0001660432,0.004262658,0.0032007224],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11694781,0.000103558035,0.0005127343,0.00024422898,0.0007222773,0.00001142987,0.0005949268,0.0013815858,0.00071758626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033588048,0.00007565702,0.00010898917,0.00042103927,0.0003817308,0.00010271144,0.00016632269,0.011365381,0.000052895026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002450744,0.00044758152,0.00205109,0.0015949951,0.000053439526,0.000017907483,0.045834474,5.2315573e-7,0.000070331706,0.00829466,0.9321789,0.007005335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018923925,0.006236219,0.00047761583,0.0070262537,0.000046670815,0.000006328686,0.0409512,0.0002822222,0.0003095212,0.048405424,0.87717175,0.00016284463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039034493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013240104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5351058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048018649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046455756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142006956","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2013-101322","title":"Incentives for postmortem organ donation: ethical and cultural considerations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Rehabilitation; Gait; Physical therapy; Beck Depression Inventory; Montreal Cognitive Assessment; Posturography; Mini–Mental State Examination; Cognition; Clinical Global Impression; Depression (economics); Rating scale; Psychology; Medicine; Anxiety; Psychiatry; Cognitive impairment; Balance (ability); Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.1126703363574629,"score_gpt":0.3852947132242925,"score_spread":0.2726243768668296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142006956","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009857228,0.00025710926,0.0011659149,0.98680323,0.0014323095,0.00032482672,0.00006555595,0.000015299052,0.00007850594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023734732,0.0014719545,0.001651092,0.968399,0.004501681,0.000016539434,0.000014004776,0.000032926175,0.000178079],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99307126,0.001299137,0.0008352341,0.00037713128,0.004115205,0.00030205137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98464787,0.012178878,0.00069674494,0.0001863659,0.0019045661,0.00038559813],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017401148,0.00027530323,0.0004906891,0.00013427623,0.00034377706,0.00027738823,0.00043288158,0.0033580265,0.00052398077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08770799,0.00019868731,0.0001941577,0.00010740751,0.001097596,0.0001541635,0.00013025844,0.0152573,0.00001095684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013639755,0.000041754247,0.000009742781,0.000207685,0.000027557187,0.00037347514,0.00073569186,0.0000029218318,0.0056927307,0.004644177,0.98807573,0.0001749039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002673149,0.00077257137,0.00027238735,0.00089482527,0.0003351492,0.0031867437,0.00027667888,0.00043372944,0.06034986,0.026557522,0.9035094,0.00073798327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005301473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000067982364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085967876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004397734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002606164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99793583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142127403","doi":"10.1136/jme.2006.017129","title":"Attitudes of research ethics board chairs towards disclosure of research results to participants: results of a national survey","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Nova Scotia Health Authority; Izaak Walton Killam Health Centre; University of British Columbia","funders":"IWK Health Centre; Dalhousie University; Dalhousie Medical Research Foundation","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Guideline; Research ethics; Set (abstract data type); Medical education; Ethics committee; Institutional review board; Protocol (science); Psychology; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Political science; Computer science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.8751013898017513,"score_gpt":0.733228617802285,"score_spread":0.14187277199946635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142127403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5946526,0.0010940628,0.00093098194,0.39112625,0.0010136678,0.0009973741,0.00051976764,0.000021531143,0.009643791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98787785,0.0064676614,0.0030979346,0.0007685545,0.00094085786,0.000005044118,0.0000189693,0.000043241787,0.0007799091],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.7412656,0.025881872,0.017395541,0.0017799616,0.20967363,0.0040033893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.18260388,0.66173714,0.0024783155,0.001955806,0.14697815,0.0042467313],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7276614,0.0002522281,0.0015144018,0.0019479465,0.00025266252,0.000031087962,0.0021341688,0.005570973,0.00012959703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.94338644,0.00018827176,0.00041512455,0.0037945083,0.0075092274,0.00013596484,0.0011649082,0.058320314,0.000014664658],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.28208515,0.028375106,0.16135333,0.04695755,0.0045446064,0.0042424765,0.1411847,0.00050321914,0.01592501,0.19962813,0.10306321,0.012137494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02237813,0.023363072,0.7930451,0.053857014,0.00013741583,0.00017551516,0.009998975,0.0001947503,0.037997376,0.0505964,0.0077120187,0.00054422853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039475258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01876133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63585526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048480858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051862445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142268187","doi":"10.1136/jme.2007.020594","title":"What constitutional protection for freedom of scientific research?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Patient Dignity and Privacy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Law; Freedom of thought; German; Political science; Academic freedom; The arts; Constitutional law; Sociology; Human rights; Philosophy; Higher education","score_opus":0.7052713485879302,"score_gpt":0.5873797607666167,"score_spread":0.11789158782131348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142268187","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000009504225,0.98116034,0.008813653,0.0042285016,0.004543783,0.000954583,0.00002090278,0.0000052243636,0.00026352535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00003347172,0.99692976,0.0011187642,0.0001195633,0.001542956,0.000011242777,0.000034986464,0.000011572335,0.00019770252],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894639,0.0006701447,0.0014910604,0.00019255572,0.007884395,0.00029792154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987675,0.005782421,0.0010089752,0.00026318082,0.004740768,0.00052962656],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04938015,0.00016264517,0.0013090784,0.00097394345,0.00024147761,0.00007191314,0.00046834,0.0023921404,0.00018313427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06536888,0.00010969112,0.0006993362,0.00067834835,0.003941097,0.00021203619,0.0000975585,0.010065311,0.000012262909],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018832533,0.00040233188,9.138812e-7,0.05238603,0.00026681012,0.000113788454,0.00033592066,3.5527637e-7,0.000002598057,0.016712537,0.0050327354,0.9245576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081114814,0.0006722678,5.526758e-7,0.11773448,0.0003894678,0.00086486095,0.00009867512,0.000010884033,0.000007793462,0.0018846669,0.8774526,0.00007261161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000057897696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000069901394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.924485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021115357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023707407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142287494","doi":"10.1136/jme.2005.013169","title":"Benefits, risks and ethical considerations in translation of stem cell research to clinical applications in Parkinson’s disease","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pluripotent Stem Cells Research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Dalhousie University; Stem Cell Network","keywords":"Parkinson's disease; Stem cell; Disease; Engineering ethics; Bioethics; Data science; Medicine; Bioinformatics; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Pathology; Biology; Engineering; Law; Cell biology","score_opus":0.4199405353045385,"score_gpt":0.5532013674500975,"score_spread":0.133260832145559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142287494","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018938452,0.99198145,0.0009221184,0.004189333,0.000095423806,0.00078495604,0.000046246914,0.0000014096024,0.00008521907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011148667,0.9874439,0.0007649347,0.00022174613,0.00031946218,0.00003319462,0.00003181366,0.000022882983,0.000013353525],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908344,0.0031707832,0.0022492465,0.0004065712,0.0029775114,0.00036145007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916375,0.0060549458,0.0003955147,0.00033198844,0.0007464554,0.00083357515],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.035621807,0.00019257583,0.00096982304,0.0006166068,0.00006887476,0.00002667975,0.00047377823,0.0037675262,0.000017392118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004212097,0.00015755031,0.00027489467,0.0004929563,0.00047921052,0.000003914325,0.00020678696,0.011164868,0.00000317701],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001847714,0.0007521548,0.0017554783,0.012209217,0.00008872493,0.00016648116,0.00035724734,0.00005592789,0.0000216251,0.0014133012,0.00074912695,0.9822459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008701038,0.0003585984,0.0012099448,0.007406308,0.00008960539,0.000047003214,0.00011508792,0.000021679418,0.000025103505,0.00036262342,0.9892922,0.00020172671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004118508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000614298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9885431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006363713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062406543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99939305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142449696","doi":"10.1136/jme.2009.032912","title":"Advance commitment: an alternative approach to the family veto problem in organ procurement","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Veto; Procurement; Organ procurement; Computer science; Data science; Medicine; Law; Business; Political science; Surgery; Politics; Marketing","score_opus":0.055820827429232035,"score_gpt":0.3763003641559736,"score_spread":0.32047953672674157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142449696","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6214274,0.00029824887,0.03917329,0.328478,0.0014946138,0.0013568607,0.000008387509,0.00003179193,0.007731421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781751,0.00041233358,0.010627536,0.010236025,0.00047964553,0.000007952988,0.000006231582,0.000011142866,0.000044034492],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99676794,0.00014236607,0.00042129305,0.000104187726,0.0024353894,0.00012882012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879116,0.00018977835,0.00015303088,0.00012224159,0.00043817743,0.0003056304],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004340281,0.00008364195,0.00017794687,0.00010721962,0.00005510206,0.000018288943,0.00026050533,0.00025308182,0.000052257376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001069721,0.000049099806,0.000035612386,0.00020593024,0.00008185743,0.00010271709,0.000017090266,0.003564159,0.000007945105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004380497,0.017533997,0.04423681,0.0027649633,0.0008592615,0.001544453,0.3736484,0.0013809017,0.045527283,0.2588385,0.009608681,0.23967625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.038927667,0.0075703925,0.2931642,0.004702328,0.0006245167,0.0043218127,0.019856166,0.010556159,0.018959042,0.013560368,0.5866798,0.0010775304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032917724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000287528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57707113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049718663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008134818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99873465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142620986","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2013-101757","title":"Taylor on posthumous organ procurement","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Bioethics; Sovereignty; Law; Organ procurement; Personal autonomy; Organ donation; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Medicine; Political science; Philosophy; Politics; Transplantation","score_opus":0.059876829293602205,"score_gpt":0.35926943280674667,"score_spread":0.29939260351314445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142620986","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00074866216,0.00016932155,0.00039196035,0.9957787,0.001263648,0.0002295171,0.0000065367453,0.00001983121,0.0013918369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009292337,0.0012412053,0.0003124429,0.97887903,0.008664135,0.0000027710196,0.00007790304,0.000045496665,0.0014846617],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99079037,0.00019832159,0.0007738561,0.0001525182,0.007867972,0.0002169917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970405,0.0007228736,0.0005499958,0.00016833413,0.0012089423,0.0003093151],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023160628,0.00021290172,0.0005078223,0.00028843206,0.000055697277,0.000035104767,0.00027403433,0.0033554516,0.00471253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029365704,0.00014119087,0.00019236033,0.00011784625,0.00012761528,0.00005063213,0.0000142446415,0.019127123,0.00027541097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000117447664,0.0001678798,0.000027589089,0.0011726299,0.00021638576,0.0040545445,0.0010539902,3.2243938e-7,0.000057219873,0.0002217438,0.9893895,0.0035207958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026568323,0.0015339913,0.0002798726,0.0027495183,0.00039747023,0.0028354123,0.00006965444,0.000020510102,0.00048365103,0.00031405222,0.98848444,0.00017462013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013492261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000050081844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01689964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014678377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022224684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142683768","doi":"10.1136/jme.2003.007021","title":"Ethical problems arising in evidence based complementary and alternative medicine: Table 1","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Victoria Park","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Alternative medicine; Health care; Ethical issues; Complementary medicine; Population; Medicine; Psychology; Data science; Computer science; Political science; Law; Pathology; Engineering","score_opus":0.3912484438029497,"score_gpt":0.5293332004573037,"score_spread":0.138084756654354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142683768","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000788464,0.9367252,0.001191237,0.060209,0.0009671178,0.00071153615,0.0000125880515,0.000011264375,0.00009320619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00058617734,0.99118793,0.00094903767,0.0051438157,0.00203067,0.000016258724,0.000027278407,0.00003899266,0.00001983074],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98861367,0.0013194259,0.002819788,0.0004775866,0.0062716585,0.0004978908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841606,0.012518268,0.0015083014,0.00027871566,0.0008021439,0.00073197874],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018284589,0.0005895514,0.0038363142,0.0007922764,0.00015079908,0.000022911698,0.00062288076,0.0007917266,0.0009394617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025791904,0.00036521323,0.0003398814,0.00064740184,0.0014035829,0.00015129743,0.00033437595,0.0198635,0.0000033035253],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030259442,0.0006337606,0.0008763526,0.16560453,0.0016728172,0.0076655494,0.0049127224,0.000027112428,0.0000025440295,0.0031746533,0.0028109094,0.8123164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043089595,0.0018954775,0.000063793355,0.48221314,0.001333041,0.001368814,0.0004902143,0.000077836616,9.602137e-7,0.0006816299,0.5073385,0.00022757937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00088351505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002568847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81208885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006081997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067422455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143028025","doi":"10.1136/jme.2006.019273","title":"Ethical decision-making about older adults and moral intensity: an international study of physicians","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Salient; Ethical decision; Perspective (graphical); Moral dilemma; Face (sociological concept); Qualitative research; Psychology; Health care; Moral reasoning; Medical ethics; Grounded theory; Social psychology; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Social science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1347336365461287,"score_gpt":0.54532563932745,"score_spread":0.41059200278132135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143028025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94275004,0.00016143483,0.004856864,0.04754861,0.0036010074,0.0002617707,0.0000032619405,0.00002017412,0.00079681317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9635803,0.0018503171,0.0035720193,0.029379806,0.0015732106,0.000003742134,0.0000010765307,0.000023551644,0.000015987267],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98409253,0.004617117,0.0018924088,0.00028678303,0.008753585,0.00035760083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95085937,0.042485677,0.001486827,0.00035502904,0.0043153423,0.00049777905],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.036296796,0.0001813847,0.0006944813,0.0002155593,0.00080125267,0.0000122064885,0.000939854,0.0030517876,0.0005079882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22948332,0.00013943408,0.00010116863,0.00023167116,0.0010657972,0.00037762645,0.00046871978,0.053574756,0.000011069421],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0056804377,0.0069603897,0.23265383,0.0009837182,0.0007410196,0.004495944,0.6112417,0.00004195255,0.000033577977,0.024211777,0.014161684,0.09879397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01812034,0.0043717967,0.64612263,0.034340214,0.00038826038,0.0018655945,0.2398351,0.006326896,0.0000103881275,0.04150575,0.0064156763,0.0006973306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019597023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039578613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41346884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010184796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021172003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99824244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143441716","doi":"10.1136/jme.2007.023325","title":"Failure to report and provide commentary on research ethics board approval and informed consent in medical journals","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Izaak Walton Killam Health Centre; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Declaration of Helsinki; Medicine; Family medicine; Institutional review board; Declaration; Research ethics; Ethics committee; Human research; Alternative medicine; Political science; Psychology; Law; Psychiatry; Pathology","score_opus":0.707864584622671,"score_gpt":0.6650793859824372,"score_spread":0.04278519864023378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143441716","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3146686,0.0006163225,0.00017338897,0.68323046,0.00028482906,0.00036941815,0.000001984123,0.000009454856,0.00064554054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7018815,0.10929395,0.0061009447,0.17977084,0.0023714735,0.000019949422,0.000005110173,0.00005897441,0.0004972067],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9549476,0.0027852606,0.0030569048,0.00051433867,0.037782688,0.00091318885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6179141,0.36388388,0.00094466284,0.0010093208,0.008056666,0.008191383],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1896425,0.00024779557,0.0010122807,0.00092308753,0.0004191378,0.00007670812,0.00069540914,0.0054579233,0.000312744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7866908,0.00017714484,0.00015174544,0.0006448298,0.003928946,0.00015000903,0.00080978597,0.08879286,0.000010959498],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009570185,0.0037471445,0.16226624,0.009737664,0.0007750334,0.3217167,0.052128967,0.000013425298,0.00033509766,0.016663456,0.40721565,0.015830433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.035061773,0.021984542,0.0905937,0.10293202,0.00022024257,0.23339838,0.021080663,0.00066854275,0.0009078253,0.057892967,0.43395576,0.0013035758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005297416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008206995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5970482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003748497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047780305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143608323","doi":"10.1136/jme.2003.005942","title":"Patient–physician relationship in the aftermath of war","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Serbian; Empowerment; Patient Empowerment; Set (abstract data type); Medicine; State (computer science); Family medicine; Health care; Psychology; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.2694690204109599,"score_gpt":0.48464345255143815,"score_spread":0.21517443214047827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143608323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6886933,0.005420329,0.00030977197,0.29655832,0.0013514556,0.00062381243,0.00001446923,0.000016558108,0.0070120012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98939514,0.0002778814,0.0006184826,0.009383243,0.00028434672,0.000014540356,0.0000050231783,0.000008331643,0.000013021039],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99100065,0.004312553,0.0016535134,0.00006958518,0.0027355494,0.00022814826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98570824,0.011748169,0.0012206038,0.00039726507,0.0008177537,0.00010795556],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005474451,0.00007984437,0.00025003107,0.00013919326,0.0003101559,0.0000031344034,0.0006664923,0.0007197438,0.00005277919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010941652,0.0000512999,0.000083988285,0.00033295844,0.00018296424,0.00012907821,0.00010091472,0.00835315,0.000015909174],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023062513,0.0010136465,0.49767652,0.0020315365,0.000030987678,0.00008082119,0.30649254,0.00012332026,0.000047674865,0.1406562,0.045575324,0.0060408046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032795449,0.00066456536,0.65909266,0.008980002,0.000060641218,0.000045723842,0.12779269,0.00074909895,0.00003307246,0.10487332,0.09414369,0.00028497848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064195733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00069242826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30070186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011620047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002411263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143620934","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2012-100882","title":"Burdens of ANH outweigh benefits in the minimally conscious state","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Traumatic Brain Injury Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Artificial nutrition; Law; State (computer science); Minimally conscious state; Medicine; Political science; Psychology; Surgery; Computer science; Parenteral nutrition; Consciousness","score_opus":0.1297816187749034,"score_gpt":0.41422010208478754,"score_spread":0.28443848330988414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143620934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79488724,0.0006100862,0.000068286085,0.20295052,0.00017088259,0.00022816725,0.0000036647116,0.0000041451963,0.001076996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992455,0.001085995,0.0011525956,0.0049155103,0.00024403071,0.0000041027924,8.7599017e-7,0.000012150555,0.00012976023],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99224204,0.00050785206,0.0010375407,0.0000995392,0.0058139744,0.00029904844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99204975,0.0056332056,0.00036017716,0.0002744769,0.0012717322,0.00041065054],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012789246,0.00010808975,0.000474192,0.00020195046,0.000036588543,0.000024879653,0.00059006456,0.00050925993,0.00094093545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021493549,0.00005957067,0.0001314355,0.00026664376,0.0006248051,0.00007486286,0.000066966626,0.0052032643,0.00003684288],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030791163,0.0065539763,0.09504889,0.0064114872,0.0017732789,0.007796356,0.20420876,0.00011272584,0.0067161964,0.023027292,0.24579242,0.39947948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02962785,0.012524709,0.8341272,0.014939683,0.00045897678,0.0127132265,0.029890727,0.0031203812,0.0024635096,0.03098789,0.028397838,0.000748036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022511228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016635793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7390783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004738966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025238546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143851427","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2012-101075","title":"A study of consent for participation in a non-therapeutic study in the pediatric intensive care population","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Agricultural Research Institute of Ontario","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Informed consent; Guardian; Medicine; Legal guardian; Family medicine; Feeling; Cohort study; Pediatrics; Alternative medicine; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.635509471462439,"score_gpt":0.6600503302272991,"score_spread":0.02454085876486012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143851427","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97175395,0.00018846462,0.00012315894,0.025801605,0.00018220508,0.0019314222,5.074549e-7,0.0000017719482,0.000016890774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99707615,0.00036939705,0.00006846167,0.0021617555,0.00022972112,0.000077861674,0.0000010759961,0.000009137937,0.0000064547667],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917763,0.001164096,0.0014496214,0.00014416086,0.0052616075,0.00020421128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92733955,0.06293497,0.00066262874,0.00035182253,0.008462979,0.00024807258],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02606551,0.000089563655,0.00045833332,0.0002886999,0.000039343933,0.000016269856,0.0003099917,0.0006775628,0.000032972537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20102887,0.00005319643,0.000088965564,0.00042580368,0.00011616617,0.000057423524,0.000059693346,0.0071468004,0.0000019573904],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035594215,0.0026952866,0.87890404,0.0005084772,0.0000467781,0.000106919986,0.11577834,0.000031475316,0.0000065358713,0.00017283008,0.0000545662,0.0013387845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0060055153,0.0063058077,0.7746035,0.0004168322,0.00013286644,0.000016986656,0.208863,0.00035069062,0.0000025039215,0.0032575482,0.000002759316,0.00004201521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013214718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01240684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17496336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001115602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002177831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145198589","doi":"10.1136/jme.2006.016980","title":"Assault on editorial independence: improprieties of the Canadian Medical Association","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Association (psychology); Law; Psychology; Political science; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.16216377817466776,"score_gpt":0.5505104544992905,"score_spread":0.3883466763246227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145198589","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023252149,0.00021553955,0.000014942919,0.09017618,0.9049949,0.00024608968,0.000056923764,0.000009952235,0.0040529654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029539245,0.0075065,0.000077330784,0.004322668,0.98279816,0.0000031277254,0.000013074346,0.00006145469,0.0022637523],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.6278793,0.0016144944,0.003081476,0.00040489426,0.3661758,0.00084399054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.23128708,0.42238528,0.008669625,0.0025192911,0.32453045,0.010608261],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.42487553,0.00039544763,0.0015387645,0.0005406593,0.00034551258,0.00008728314,0.0029603818,0.19599496,0.0019389658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9532171,0.000242614,0.00088937476,0.0005913023,0.0016360766,0.000075649514,0.00042551328,0.43875986,0.00004761893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005248175,0.00024044607,0.000277879,0.0009805668,0.00040226584,0.0005066606,0.00057055295,7.861762e-7,0.0000024673686,0.0013636987,0.9943367,0.0007931169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028206354,0.0014226392,0.00032394406,0.009289627,0.00027045546,0.00005075198,0.00022525221,0.000008961534,0.00006884544,0.003077403,0.982239,0.0002024647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08715066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5081927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5283416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032925655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5294559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99897337},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2146235412","doi":"10.1136/jme.2003.005181","title":"Better governance in academic health sciences centres: moving beyond the Olivieri/Apotex Affair in Toronto","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.4264682264886879,"score_gpt":0.6112815323606047,"score_spread":0.1848133058719168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146235412","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23458318,0.020300541,0.000044220866,0.7412889,0.0018474145,0.00023483415,0.000011114875,0.000010634366,0.0016791662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8310511,0.03478306,0.00011821479,0.13310888,0.0008966771,0.000005093442,6.369785e-7,0.000008892049,0.000027396138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993682,0.0019829278,0.0012222982,0.00023174952,0.0020526447,0.0008283418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955953,0.0027880128,0.00054105103,0.00011200128,0.00013135688,0.0008322897],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02477851,0.00019156108,0.0004398739,0.000065279055,0.0003641215,0.000022193724,0.0011265824,0.002132401,0.0014792698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042851977,0.0001315536,0.000101364356,0.0003923464,0.0009783803,0.00035150463,0.00015714193,0.023061112,0.000012976499],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018791612,0.003213048,0.12214884,0.0020872678,0.00031231044,0.0039768643,0.074916355,0.0077855126,0.0011403939,0.38474113,0.03483549,0.36296362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02188823,0.0020821646,0.08336914,0.008022256,0.00014480173,0.0019039349,0.02392691,0.0062009557,0.0034209955,0.08575385,0.76194143,0.001345353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010140555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009462945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7271059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001257512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005630586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146965490","doi":"10.1136/jme.2003.007484","title":"The Olivieri debacle: where were the heroes of bioethics? A Reply","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Porphyrin Metabolism and Disorders","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"St. Michael's Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Silence; Sick child; Wish; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Law; Medicine; Political science; Philosophy; Pediatrics; Aesthetics; Anthropology","score_opus":0.024232966257356128,"score_gpt":0.34058580473634026,"score_spread":0.31635283847898416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146965490","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45104095,0.09130783,0.0050405106,0.448697,0.0018790849,0.00019134628,0.00001108279,0.000007715194,0.0018244828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90215266,0.088790566,0.00050538155,0.007605536,0.0007865049,0.0000021696071,0.0000019392405,0.000015609414,0.00013964338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735856,0.0002926768,0.0005142875,0.00010801684,0.0015305701,0.0001958685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832577,0.00034464375,0.0003976572,0.00033041553,0.000440695,0.00016081265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063172677,0.00010702951,0.0001865082,0.000019017754,0.00019229933,0.000027851216,0.0008042397,0.0006008549,0.000027759374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077549703,0.000051459,0.00019907135,0.00009241568,0.0012294917,0.0000047346425,0.00013282124,0.0018766085,0.0000023639193],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003556228,0.0026583143,0.0049649025,0.001642128,0.0033611518,0.0005384556,0.020921055,0.0014563987,0.14495961,0.42567384,0.15569198,0.23457591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027169278,0.000744955,0.0013890367,0.00046663126,0.00012219306,0.000534925,0.0064843777,0.000011556498,0.0256104,0.024080299,0.9376017,0.00023699676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013371208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7819097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000698763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018816725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9283984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147007181","doi":"10.1136/jme.2010.037804","title":"How the public responded to the Schiavo controversy: evidence from letters to editors","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"NeuroDevNet; University of British Columbia; Montreal Clinical Research Institute","funders":"National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Institut de Recherche Clinique De Montréal","keywords":"Newspaper; Pluralism (philosophy); Clinical Ethics; Living Wills; Politics; Media coverage; News media; Proxy (statistics); Psychological intervention; Law; Political science; Public opinion; Psychology; Public relations; Sociology; Media studies; Epistemology; Engineering ethics","score_opus":0.1805731173230011,"score_gpt":0.5224807864474506,"score_spread":0.3419076691244495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147007181","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0448055,0.000202671,0.012923645,0.89460814,0.046685986,0.00046658205,0.00000721246,0.000024898278,0.00027535876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40593305,0.0005959526,0.003501764,0.53238505,0.057061173,0.00003209235,8.169361e-7,0.000035236193,0.00045484622],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9718332,0.0133979535,0.0012344742,0.00031177112,0.01244051,0.00078203285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.57761246,0.41204798,0.0016730268,0.0016450237,0.0039350903,0.0030864184],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13720973,0.00021127789,0.00044809523,0.00015395145,0.0021454233,0.0001946974,0.0035707576,0.0022313837,0.0012532381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.84255546,0.000101443606,0.00017540388,0.0005759549,0.0009286561,0.0005422507,0.00073624705,0.0876939,0.00036173602],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041574362,0.000054606004,0.0005802524,0.000052463765,0.00010500355,0.00011812744,0.017321294,0.0000023086582,0.0039730086,0.023055194,0.95196146,0.0023605628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007244848,0.000153367,0.0013414212,0.0012409447,0.00007514485,0.000029251578,0.008377772,0.00004365784,0.000041955256,0.004575164,0.9832668,0.0001300388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041744622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004043438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70534575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016920098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008148754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147194198","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2012-101311","title":"Honorary authorship in biomedical journals: how common is it and why does it exist?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Montreal General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Medical journal; Multivariate analysis; Library science; Psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Law; Political science; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.7377882140349933,"score_gpt":0.6333431856879266,"score_spread":0.1044450283470667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147194198","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27278885,0.0031732232,0.001955932,0.7197912,0.0012862013,0.00010862072,0.000007401808,0.000004318872,0.00088426674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9624143,0.0130228745,0.0013045464,0.02154074,0.00069588056,0.0000028527306,6.378152e-7,0.000013295635,0.0010048506],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9490835,0.0019113902,0.0019970743,0.00043304628,0.045849096,0.00072586205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92920065,0.054273672,0.0017100468,0.00078768167,0.008801628,0.0052263252],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1806186,0.0002020005,0.0007715202,0.032122344,0.00023421348,0.003735425,0.0036683546,0.0016680643,0.006315853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.33243597,0.00010361549,0.00023097175,0.04687287,0.0011352092,0.0012903338,0.00089937483,0.00877544,0.00008953437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004312114,0.00040550446,0.050642833,0.00004863663,0.000041204898,0.0006343616,0.0046028965,7.558178e-7,0.00014275785,0.0006146338,0.7643243,0.17849901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028952537,0.0009898576,0.08051968,0.0010228488,0.00002291348,0.0009331369,0.013104122,0.005541556,0.00017064005,0.26550457,0.62882006,0.00047539163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003046656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002219176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6982504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011443685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020377445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148138299","doi":"10.1136/jme.28.3.196","title":"Present self-represented futures of value are a reason for the wrongness of killing","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canmore Museum and Geoscience Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscious mind; Futures contract; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis; Computer science","score_opus":0.10467753934777134,"score_gpt":0.3254203940422592,"score_spread":0.22074285469448784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148138299","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000458656,0.010532594,0.00026469634,0.9824887,0.0035566757,0.00023034084,0.00008004298,0.00001105895,0.0023772283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21006462,0.022938719,0.00078440073,0.5505731,0.20885089,0.000044921555,0.00006519736,0.00020310059,0.0064750556],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952943,0.0005933255,0.001040504,0.00015140677,0.0026782341,0.00024226507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869763,0.00933722,0.001916297,0.00031171314,0.0013690079,0.000089442554],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041654767,0.00022664753,0.00080131774,0.00013569639,0.00027579826,0.000028636518,0.0010800239,0.0020824184,0.0013869166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032466447,0.00012854672,0.0006022354,0.000032629123,0.0012243333,0.00006735115,0.0000859059,0.008850135,0.0000016732973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016532521,0.00019830652,0.000021735164,0.0022002764,0.0012654009,0.00014986681,0.025640285,0.000038896953,6.190851e-7,0.103385,0.86628425,0.00065002125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006715141,0.00028115106,0.000020540601,0.0020715597,0.00062481477,0.00006696121,0.0012887861,0.0003016235,0.000015746966,0.031481903,0.9630364,0.0001389675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011782655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000679976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4319156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019653351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043213696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148176058","doi":"10.1136/jme.2007.020776","title":"Ordering suicide: media reporting of family assisted suicide in Britain","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Assisted suicide; Contradiction; Psychology; Medicine; Law; Psychiatry; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.4210631310536104,"score_gpt":0.5384371795147426,"score_spread":0.1173740484611322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148176058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97807306,0.007321472,0.0053520463,0.0071051866,0.000497354,0.000073346375,0.0000015214048,0.000009646435,0.0015663445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860306,0.0036185505,0.008574734,0.0012707463,0.00046150121,3.6864392e-7,0.000003410793,0.000016890255,0.000023200508],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99203736,0.00017090094,0.0036356214,0.00013096667,0.003712555,0.00031259347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885866,0.005877662,0.003248261,0.00020580315,0.0015999799,0.00048167343],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028031167,0.00013586394,0.000991453,0.00035720668,0.000024038549,0.000004952625,0.00021871978,0.0007956119,0.00007086845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17832868,0.00010674137,0.00022060546,0.00048738444,0.00029422558,0.00007413569,0.000061622566,0.0034792498,0.000001003568],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009894319,0.00064644613,0.8394715,0.0018813888,0.00035636075,0.0141601255,0.017336959,0.00003119811,0.02970547,0.0009767344,0.0011096575,0.09333469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006974134,0.0009307153,0.88785696,0.04067613,0.00029012084,0.0016868422,0.019435735,0.0002716402,0.030254144,0.001173767,0.01011953,0.00033028494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075880013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010610417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15029751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011673514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019638368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99881977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148201779","doi":"10.1136/jme.2003.006577","title":"Introduction to The Olivieri symposium","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Health and Conflict Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Battle; Law; Academic freedom; Sociology; History; Political science; Higher education","score_opus":0.11186028792937566,"score_gpt":0.508080210288748,"score_spread":0.3962199223593723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148201779","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007600232,0.0004510546,0.0038570834,0.9814986,0.005300392,0.00016676541,9.859546e-7,0.0000114293025,0.001113458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1365471,0.01274149,0.0010789541,0.7793412,0.068236455,0.000041026808,0.0000012465068,0.000030344683,0.0019821387],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99611837,0.00046135168,0.0007507581,0.000085975145,0.0022436068,0.0003399657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99683976,0.0013008103,0.0002861318,0.00016537294,0.00085309433,0.0005548302],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013221707,0.00007566489,0.00022925393,0.000062489264,0.00085465243,0.000005848064,0.00033915372,0.00058517733,0.00044025935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017430281,0.00004035092,0.00006359322,0.00020156635,0.00009915668,0.000049383176,0.00010508675,0.007072925,0.0003194864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003088539,0.00021658791,0.00044486704,0.0008887763,0.00013766173,0.00010960714,0.5128486,0.00025894423,0.00013213351,0.05069685,0.41966516,0.014291929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005434968,0.00018998691,0.0008689133,0.00040805008,0.000016087026,0.000044026805,0.0035761828,0.0000033506817,0.00000921909,0.0003767977,0.99392265,0.000041233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016005953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016844114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5742575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016148946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004985816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148902952","doi":"10.1136/jme.2009.032789","title":"The ethical physician encounters international medical travel","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Global Healthcare and Medical Tourism","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Point (geometry); Public relations; Health care; Travel medicine; Medical care; Business; Medicine; Political science; Nursing; Law","score_opus":0.0795210949276253,"score_gpt":0.5270799224893249,"score_spread":0.4475588275616996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148902952","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013550813,0.000243215,0.0019356548,0.922454,0.03237255,0.00016083308,0.0000058086466,0.00002396643,0.02925314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.523082,0.011746385,0.0006376805,0.43011734,0.0325352,0.000019724826,0.000007085931,0.00004387358,0.0018106813],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98335785,0.0015174564,0.001617807,0.00017845858,0.012650571,0.0006778547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830203,0.012058607,0.0007188318,0.00029430172,0.0017930556,0.0021148762],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.040264808,0.00016937761,0.0004158708,0.00007803476,0.0009611305,0.000022775848,0.0018919482,0.005815124,0.002236418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08697611,0.00009371302,0.0002436222,0.00017676536,0.0010754074,0.00008537019,0.00024973077,0.06398844,0.00015317553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024078808,0.00027260746,0.00064101676,0.00021860101,0.00018573653,0.0008633617,0.0070588407,2.2781018e-7,0.0001248761,0.21757871,0.6240895,0.14872578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014745101,0.00014221093,0.002116041,0.0010216094,0.000023556127,0.00019366693,0.0035541134,0.00029086438,0.000009674066,0.010775993,0.98028946,0.00010832844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027106906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019368976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5095312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001179765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0140582835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99867564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149212362","doi":"10.1136/jme.2002.001370","title":"Law and policy in the era of reproductive genetics","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Legislature; Reproductive technology; Context (archaeology); Legislation; Preimplantation genetic diagnosis; Political science; Stakeholder; Reproductive rights; Diversity (politics); Law; Reproductive health; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Biology; Genetics; Population","score_opus":0.07227857283740495,"score_gpt":0.4304319101127644,"score_spread":0.3581533372753594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149212362","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52354044,0.004294782,0.000112902926,0.47102988,0.0000994713,0.00010450896,4.7623502e-7,0.0000045781226,0.00081295357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97850376,0.010897481,0.0018600058,0.008123094,0.0006072132,9.673298e-7,1.6906198e-7,0.000004309292,0.000002975823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976786,0.00011362301,0.00046156126,0.000115817886,0.0014955237,0.00013492226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863344,0.00039286565,0.00022589361,0.00025977616,0.00037460087,0.00011339744],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006293186,0.000062222105,0.00026450583,0.000096700904,0.000036381905,0.000004267948,0.0001728032,0.00042490216,0.0000047621165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023682402,0.000034170087,0.00004292612,0.00026630913,0.000831592,0.00003390597,0.000042625725,0.004165031,4.6582034e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067382114,0.0010758616,0.009496392,0.0012118215,0.00012755144,0.001013653,0.025134074,0.0000390296,0.0012213867,0.8969795,0.0004908678,0.06253603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0108640455,0.0068330904,0.18197374,0.003951091,0.00018953669,0.013733291,0.012530927,0.000014848978,0.02240276,0.6975331,0.049712267,0.00026133217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031448572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006174124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46290678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046837256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020260813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149683033","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2012-100801","title":"In defence of academic freedom: bioethics journals under siege","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Siege; Bioethics; Political science; Academic freedom; Engineering ethics; Data science; Medicine; Computer science; Law; History; Engineering; Ancient history","score_opus":0.3546697758132368,"score_gpt":0.607770385402003,"score_spread":0.25310060958876623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149683033","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08570826,0.0043918956,0.012572092,0.8847226,0.0064354576,0.00044948535,0.0000042644547,0.00002014205,0.005695792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8737333,0.037023112,0.0051419097,0.08086065,0.0028366009,0.000013230624,7.0445174e-7,0.000045346223,0.00034516488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97245413,0.011350365,0.004061572,0.000234351,0.0111178905,0.00078171195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84650254,0.14140047,0.0042621447,0.0005376844,0.005647491,0.0016496385],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13558044,0.0002263114,0.00087737705,0.0004656777,0.0004204526,0.000015077899,0.0017751036,0.008114396,0.009015656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.40210542,0.00016689206,0.00019230618,0.0007322089,0.0026002615,0.00085417775,0.00042596957,0.13968377,0.0003088108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038154313,0.0009776219,0.032186355,0.0043421662,0.00036083264,0.0006467501,0.059699833,0.0002648352,0.0035102013,0.73307157,0.16049556,0.0040627485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005135339,0.00053655397,0.0127759455,0.019065425,0.0001544935,0.00043393194,0.045750946,0.0009885288,0.00021300015,0.8908689,0.02360219,0.00047475612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014475369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005271991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.803862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002679567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011928459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99367297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151338592","doi":"10.1136/jme.2008.025643","title":"Is once always enough? Revisiting the single use item","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Data science; Computer science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.7170370260247181,"score_gpt":0.6304447329734427,"score_spread":0.08659229305127536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151338592","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05736605,0.0015298636,0.0018742101,0.93484825,0.00042920432,0.00012828805,0.0000016801399,0.00002020984,0.0038022518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84090596,0.017643936,0.0045601027,0.13075289,0.0050379457,6.0123676e-7,9.226677e-7,0.000022391023,0.0010752479],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98423713,0.00067736866,0.0013581131,0.00021145758,0.013091851,0.0004240592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8227891,0.168067,0.0009853931,0.00091440306,0.0057169506,0.0015272171],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.056024063,0.00014507372,0.00050840876,0.00009701404,0.000239219,0.000114932984,0.0008189851,0.0021537882,0.00062188104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.56010073,0.00008292546,0.00033182066,0.0003589599,0.00066041655,0.00017019518,0.0001445514,0.030993143,0.000040970346],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021737623,0.0025028884,0.009187645,0.0031311414,0.00091996626,0.011863425,0.031201031,0.000027299613,0.009040129,0.31269765,0.061334595,0.5559205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009758543,0.009586486,0.041183524,0.053115916,0.00081233867,0.0082826875,0.0047355853,0.0023127254,0.008121812,0.18033493,0.68089145,0.00086397154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025557538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023849501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8040953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015143532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052473177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99914163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151370161","doi":"10.1136/jme.2007.024000","title":"Myth of reincarnation: a challenge for mental health profession","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Reincarnation; Subject (documents); Dilemma; Mental health; Mythology; Order (exchange); Alternative medicine; Anxiety; Medicine; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Medical education; Psychiatry; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Engineering; Pathology; Library science","score_opus":0.10470395302396693,"score_gpt":0.5098159774459827,"score_spread":0.40511202442201577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151370161","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02039729,0.0091366405,0.007185723,0.9470912,0.00461126,0.00036270072,0.000010608802,0.0000144165615,0.0111901425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9683809,0.005120109,0.0020641263,0.022075124,0.0013784516,0.0000050543435,0.0000045066113,0.000009086334,0.0009626151],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973059,0.00020927927,0.0006302535,0.000082249564,0.0015946723,0.00017764278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998598,0.0002738582,0.0005580463,0.0000883285,0.00025965617,0.00022215539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004427837,0.00006742312,0.00026512137,0.000064946405,0.0000901501,0.000004358513,0.000275046,0.00045994006,0.00027070194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072694925,0.000045996247,0.00011203941,0.000078815596,0.00009291573,0.000065402164,0.000015245899,0.0012859959,0.000002406957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014724408,0.0021876309,0.00005836296,0.00024940056,0.00012693934,0.000072137125,0.1377989,0.0000045713964,0.00026941593,0.44585595,0.066592164,0.3453121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0099091185,0.016122196,0.002905892,0.0023204198,0.000032067284,0.0007010398,0.017704802,0.0005246317,0.00026967126,0.015127644,0.9340944,0.0002881107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018187844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007636071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9479836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003528686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008025802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55870837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151716583","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2011-100252","title":"Tacitly opting out of organ donation: too presumptuous after all?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Neurological Complications and Syndromes","field":"Medicine","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Complication; Medicine; Cerebral blood flow; Surgery; Organ donation; Subclavian artery; Intensive care medicine; Cardiology; Transplantation","score_opus":0.1578008563732879,"score_gpt":0.3800021811304643,"score_spread":0.2222013247571764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151716583","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054990235,0.0010502283,0.0013714553,0.98885447,0.0010132005,0.00017608053,0.00001200361,0.00001842469,0.0020050989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036760807,0.0020453199,0.004079333,0.95071185,0.005048817,0.000009197004,0.000026056934,0.000049876555,0.0012687467],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933888,0.00034544163,0.0013576925,0.00023581566,0.0043901317,0.0002821655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953235,0.0015272775,0.0010335229,0.00039981282,0.0014033047,0.00031257377],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032152615,0.0002441561,0.00093036616,0.00022769658,0.000037603113,0.000022106964,0.00060259365,0.0035251153,0.002336492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072738426,0.0001581864,0.0003854599,0.0001206814,0.0003869195,0.000067904635,0.00014226939,0.016243424,0.000031556163],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030132296,0.0003952612,0.0008394036,0.0017949848,0.0006108347,0.012053455,0.0020499495,7.0214577e-7,0.0001372365,0.00042456217,0.97752917,0.0038631128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008954629,0.0009828088,0.0024289396,0.0009436177,0.0004437638,0.0030270524,0.00001839,0.00001584124,0.00007465985,0.0012682149,0.98972684,0.00017438007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010661603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000032624175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038142636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047011636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013379514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152352660","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2012-101290","title":"Position statement on ethics, equipoise and research on charged particle radiation therapy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry","field":"Medicine","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre; European Investment Bank; Science and Technology Facilities Council; Cancer Research UK; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Position statement; Engineering ethics; Statement (logic); Clinical equipoise; Position (finance); Position paper; Psychology; Research ethics; Medicine; Medical education; Clinical trial; Political science; Law; Family medicine; Engineering; Pathology; Business","score_opus":0.20676621228491862,"score_gpt":0.49897361299479726,"score_spread":0.2922074007098786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152352660","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66564214,0.00097442337,0.00019289591,0.332544,0.00023194314,0.00020944861,0.0000010153373,0.00000909635,0.00019504485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9597666,0.015586924,0.00008852792,0.02383925,0.00060001295,0.0000068023814,0.0000035350308,0.000011796927,0.00009652683],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934185,0.0011150846,0.0005217073,0.0001276548,0.0045923037,0.00022475517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99506474,0.003200937,0.00020414712,0.00014737493,0.000862248,0.0005205713],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018038005,0.00009208872,0.00021549177,0.0001980998,0.00019354571,0.000055643748,0.000106418134,0.0006812768,0.0009900257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064328536,0.000062723535,0.00006229465,0.00020775122,0.00019218361,0.00014182639,0.000013404785,0.005655323,0.000073318115],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011191839,0.0067284307,0.010398343,0.0007582998,0.0010787622,0.00055545033,0.060990013,0.00015446081,0.04940239,0.10714089,0.11274129,0.6388598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.06406308,0.06735577,0.37435934,0.0070557385,0.00020501095,0.0007414217,0.0075240713,0.016693795,0.2138802,0.060476284,0.18653253,0.0011127891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046553992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000023316386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63774705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014813867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009819247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152415384","doi":"10.1136/jme.2010.041210","title":"Good parents would not fulfil their obligation to genetically enhance their unborn children","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Moral obligation; Obligation; Normative; Task (project management); Psychology; Abortion; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Economics; Pregnancy; Biology; Genetics","score_opus":0.09958575933661845,"score_gpt":0.40125031553920704,"score_spread":0.3016645562025886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152415384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81028724,0.0026570777,0.008657068,0.1726001,0.0018930191,0.00046336825,0.00002940529,0.000046072768,0.0033666668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95924735,0.0053626127,0.004001162,0.02901054,0.0022424476,0.000004770628,0.000007883262,0.000030863852,0.00009234862],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939313,0.0004037137,0.001166144,0.00027137506,0.0037926512,0.0004347949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99496555,0.0010431096,0.00040351893,0.00038656767,0.001654471,0.0015467801],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008771612,0.00023573848,0.00059108523,0.000186929,0.00013058902,0.00002761768,0.00061553926,0.0026091493,0.0005012515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012957315,0.00015523663,0.00021716743,0.0003862838,0.00023757188,0.00008581414,0.00014768649,0.01215968,0.000046735975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041675232,0.003943548,0.12814927,0.002983588,0.001996494,0.0019384971,0.21639924,0.000027719505,0.003291043,0.051664487,0.01559387,0.5698447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01210244,0.019343141,0.6138799,0.012387109,0.0012176647,0.0042182063,0.007917527,0.00082250853,0.061621524,0.038263362,0.22585264,0.0023739617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020692058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007739669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5674708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001289009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038828957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99868566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152491080","doi":"10.1136/jme.2006.020289","title":"Duty to disclose what? Querying the putative obligation to return research results to participants","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Duty; Computer science; Psychology; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Data science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.8631411267184941,"score_gpt":0.7083408936249084,"score_spread":0.1548002330935857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152491080","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37702286,0.00017047042,0.0012205485,0.6199226,0.0005893471,0.00050590804,0.000004788228,0.000011333546,0.0005521717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94922394,0.0055827317,0.0032982768,0.038781848,0.0018185261,0.000027391097,0.0000023387286,0.000033111915,0.0012318155],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96643084,0.0030257397,0.0021396598,0.00050314853,0.026799768,0.0011008583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7754701,0.19667758,0.0005971646,0.0015403038,0.01782676,0.007888113],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16220672,0.00017789158,0.00058859464,0.00047808726,0.00063362997,0.00015498509,0.0011983889,0.0015900035,0.000110625406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7674151,0.00010518044,0.00019117694,0.0017784727,0.0010277021,0.00026954178,0.00059214316,0.027703203,0.00023510323],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.029577138,0.0031068153,0.0045566973,0.0014814484,0.0009252664,0.013912525,0.62333393,0.00085665425,0.014505307,0.03680582,0.20468688,0.066251494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.024165712,0.04822677,0.1191072,0.092401974,0.0005248036,0.004497984,0.15748377,0.002271107,0.060436495,0.2702138,0.21857952,0.00209086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013281583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6052084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004362747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01183452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153371116","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2013-101648","title":"Returning incidental findings from genetic research to children: views of parents of children affected by rare diseases","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Genomics and Rare Diseases","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Regroupement Québécois sur les Matériaux de Pointe; University of Ottawa; Dalhousie University; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario; McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; McMaster University; Genome Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Thematic analysis; Enthusiasm; Medicine; Perception; Focus group; Qualitative research; Family medicine; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.02391114697367104,"score_gpt":0.3437980715224418,"score_spread":0.31988692454877077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153371116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926055,0.005917753,0.00012544515,0.00077890535,0.00012444383,0.00020769305,0.00023002128,0.0000017846454,0.0000084608255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968041,0.0019885453,0.0003238596,0.00035935073,0.00030218405,0.000004346227,0.00018700601,0.000017190427,0.000013381531],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99666715,0.00039527734,0.0006404049,0.00020576468,0.0018494696,0.00024195963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99804896,0.00017573191,0.00029681108,0.00023599411,0.0007020255,0.0005404742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010948158,0.00013401656,0.000331509,0.000104461564,0.00007432991,0.000024875859,0.0006711676,0.0005069699,0.00020384302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004635335,0.00010482307,0.00018970382,0.00014568913,0.00024186101,0.0000068503564,0.00031578168,0.0009648232,0.000005594111],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034245115,0.0011267946,0.45772767,0.00015318203,0.00072713103,0.000039530732,0.0010814135,0.00005029169,0.47072214,0.0000139193735,0.062161,0.0058544776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015559387,0.0010812285,0.933032,0.00065513566,0.000101282814,0.000068271125,0.0003218771,0.000023843015,0.062160805,0.00018715874,0.00059035164,0.00022211566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003167665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000267747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47530434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019159608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066326343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5549264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153804538","doi":"10.1136/jme.2009.030346","title":"Clinical obligations and public health programmes: healthcare provider reasoning about managing the incidental results of newborn screening","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Genomics and Rare Diseases","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario; Mount Sinai Hospital; University of Ottawa; University of Toronto; Miller Group (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Duty; Health care; Medicine; Genetic testing; Normative; Family medicine; Qualitative research; Confidentiality; Newborn screening; Nursing; Psychology; Pediatrics; Political science; Business; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.06296920655960246,"score_gpt":0.411147985842741,"score_spread":0.3481787792831385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153804538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56906927,0.017743021,0.010179709,0.40236193,0.00029342057,0.00025406465,0.00002173143,0.0000070786677,0.000069776615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773651,0.009003679,0.0050704936,0.007992922,0.00052521995,9.903554e-7,0.00002405684,0.000007425332,0.000010153676],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735254,0.00044209903,0.00090754393,0.00016203606,0.00089986884,0.0002359209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979693,0.00021277169,0.0006891495,0.0001772554,0.00045625892,0.00049522554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007714154,0.00009347122,0.00022817467,0.000048539292,0.00020030294,0.000052588148,0.00030561985,0.0003644179,0.0000016647537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007147203,0.00006186147,0.00013642089,0.000102398255,0.0002764345,0.000009036248,0.000098494354,0.0012474835,1.2940704e-7],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034435015,0.00037092852,0.01578548,0.00020651381,0.00018922398,0.00006972673,0.0022424543,0.000024840232,0.00018433073,0.0027816377,0.004112459,0.97368807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014966582,0.012805709,0.4584907,0.0061232103,0.00025254878,0.003446499,0.034479987,0.0023790793,0.00036913584,0.008073556,0.45760477,0.0010082389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011622338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022943511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9726798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013959825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023858608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85563856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156498790","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2012-100524","title":"Accessibility and transparency of editor conflicts of interest policy instruments in medical journals","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Subject (documents); The Internet; Computer science; Impact factor; Publishing; Internet privacy; Public relations; World Wide Web; Political science; Law; Computer security","score_opus":0.7590710822015326,"score_gpt":0.675394627864092,"score_spread":0.08367645433744064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156498790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9362358,0.00313467,0.000055803353,0.05594673,0.0040418687,0.00012164533,0.00003076636,0.0000045610354,0.00042817427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98024523,0.010274257,0.000049439514,0.004999548,0.0044092564,0.0000018314435,0.0000013672278,0.00000895036,0.000010141842],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.993105,0.0020160696,0.0020973543,0.00013451558,0.0021247435,0.0005223151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930307,0.003024031,0.00091155927,0.00012417187,0.0005753523,0.0023341365],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.025099095,0.0001768379,0.000719422,0.00029097442,0.000073516945,0.00000753328,0.0006842693,0.0034647065,0.0031230995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018436179,0.00013697798,0.00012935292,0.0003491337,0.0011401285,0.0003116886,0.00014153468,0.014217272,0.0000022062356],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021096845,0.0043158717,0.81843555,0.003301246,0.00050511555,0.00021204438,0.016105367,0.000005897848,0.003672505,0.012543875,0.0031314546,0.1356614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0332325,0.002778367,0.5919584,0.011586464,0.0008858861,0.0026485715,0.0044666585,0.0019276262,0.07575057,0.01527843,0.2583158,0.0011707246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009063499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000080170525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25518435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008790565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029010514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157295878","doi":"10.1136/jme.27.1.20","title":"Professional recommendations: disclosing facts and values","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Dalhousie University","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Heuristic; Advice (programming); Ask price; Psychology; Epistemology; Public relations; Computer science; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.15212241627076642,"score_gpt":0.4345955684014987,"score_spread":0.2824731521307323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157295878","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2638326,0.003832025,0.0002826447,0.6988981,0.011867611,0.00010957408,0.000009115982,0.00001657314,0.021151803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9530868,0.009902234,0.00075441157,0.026696753,0.0055927522,0.0000010843096,0.0000075350554,0.000012258022,0.003946186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820536,0.00016583032,0.000368909,0.00005131534,0.0010877076,0.000120853205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875313,0.00059797015,0.00018065484,0.0000390823,0.00014436927,0.00028482275],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027590091,0.000056110443,0.0001186743,0.000052537183,0.00039556183,0.000049186747,0.00010211164,0.000171405,0.003756452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006510099,0.00003604821,0.00003503974,0.000016748003,0.00018538118,0.00015204053,0.000024711686,0.0016334566,0.000008613013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023736958,0.0005854011,0.0030393046,0.0006088964,0.00007215724,0.00009364734,0.14932361,3.4777463e-7,0.0000054586776,0.5441187,0.16696355,0.13495155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006878698,0.00021354406,0.00055242,0.0014036756,0.000018149221,0.00021192787,0.0165241,0.00004428356,0.0000034812836,0.043632425,0.9366249,0.0000832156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000039317445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024916723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76966137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000152021985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005092371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99715424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157594633","doi":"10.1136/jme.2006.017376","title":"The need for additional safeguards in the informed consent process in schizophrenia research","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; McGill University; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Informed consent; Voluntarism (philosophy); Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming); Process (computing); Population; Psychology; Psychiatry; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Computer science; Environmental health","score_opus":0.29974717044718907,"score_gpt":0.6043686781546574,"score_spread":0.3046215077074684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157594633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5694524,0.0007826922,0.0007736284,0.42109036,0.0021798746,0.00061637856,0.000053147603,0.0000073598894,0.0050441646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943006,0.0004025886,0.00021232842,0.0039335517,0.001046267,0.000023577726,0.000006224668,0.000008633838,0.00006621388],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919817,0.0012562394,0.0011306277,0.00011682075,0.0049563143,0.000558293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8855062,0.11271297,0.00025311345,0.00019332519,0.0010791922,0.00025516073],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08247504,0.00008011972,0.00018866337,0.0003120378,0.00027962792,0.00004176539,0.00083270617,0.00090465375,0.00052702584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1274211,0.00003883721,0.00008395294,0.00053306256,0.0006488931,0.000038551694,0.000030326497,0.008288012,0.00001590864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011810453,0.0012818497,0.0005860288,0.0004591379,0.00014605578,0.008952008,0.10574636,0.00003007136,0.000004886162,0.111083336,0.25666234,0.5032375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009483165,0.0013498897,0.08231582,0.0044977893,0.000011558435,0.0054229586,0.14980677,0.00014409148,0.000005920864,0.15403448,0.59269416,0.00023339559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000082893566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004682307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5030041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011490762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009337482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99627864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158512095","doi":"10.1136/jme.2006.020032","title":"Access to medical records for research purposes: varying perceptions across research ethics boards","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Dalhousie University; McMaster University; Montreal Clinical Research Institute; St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Medical record; Research ethics; Computer science; Data anonymization; Medical education; Internet privacy; Psychology; Medicine; Information privacy; Alternative medicine; Pathology","score_opus":0.9235046505256967,"score_gpt":0.7798831747659812,"score_spread":0.1436214757597155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158512095","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15568846,0.0006820726,0.012079347,0.8243309,0.0020508873,0.0013899475,0.000032744807,0.000057284473,0.0036883017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7760911,0.12099851,0.02058986,0.058804877,0.015974946,0.00029437515,0.00002421912,0.00026511523,0.0069570197],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.86588335,0.009705576,0.0043428354,0.001310188,0.11520271,0.0035553449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.18275452,0.6983044,0.0007792944,0.0028173744,0.09767172,0.017672664],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4893532,0.0003384472,0.0013099511,0.001266127,0.0031768847,0.00031457897,0.005003728,0.012486168,0.003400467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9299513,0.00026303926,0.00068397925,0.0029626288,0.0074939495,0.0004329104,0.0029378904,0.1605162,0.00019624097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014163567,0.008430776,0.023138573,0.014529415,0.0014136494,0.01929172,0.14732677,0.000067199435,0.0015412311,0.064600885,0.64775765,0.057738565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.022737999,0.025030505,0.020873534,0.048401106,0.00023355703,0.014810929,0.028332328,0.002263049,0.0016552741,0.19142982,0.64265734,0.0015745607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007394628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036405723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76552606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010516318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11289378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158992216","doi":"10.1136/jme.2009.033340","title":"Therapeutic privilege: between the ethics of lying and the practice of truth: Figure 1","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal; Université de Montréal; Centre Integre de Sante et de Services Sociaux de Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Lying; Privilege (computing); Psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Medicine; Computer security","score_opus":0.34165002706497544,"score_gpt":0.5419719592580532,"score_spread":0.20032193219307776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158992216","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041488305,0.00685286,0.0008201956,0.94673973,0.0020864257,0.0005961135,0.0000120662735,0.000010652394,0.0013936555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98090947,0.0048119463,0.0013840444,0.012278989,0.00056926114,0.000011812995,0.0000013376782,0.000015518868,0.00001763288],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836528,0.010603241,0.001806757,0.00010420409,0.003577071,0.00025595477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74389005,0.24706972,0.0038069475,0.00094097474,0.0039901705,0.00030214348],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.039615296,0.000118440366,0.00048068128,0.00007158499,0.0008507836,0.000008966196,0.0013150144,0.0018291778,0.00014420513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21264803,0.00005792257,0.00011472232,0.00023439305,0.0016373589,0.00015367768,0.00034815844,0.034248833,0.0000031336217],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009339053,0.0002391338,0.040517837,0.004123231,0.00054577226,0.000008329293,0.49968204,0.0000056630834,0.00018998393,0.42915732,0.0018123736,0.02278441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01569393,0.0011201451,0.06384286,0.011707627,0.001438911,0.0002394161,0.23149139,0.001338095,0.00028937086,0.12847099,0.5438495,0.00051772955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032579247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001530116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9394212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032749696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056009907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159244155","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2011-100086","title":"Testing relationships: ethical arguments for screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus with HbA1C","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Diabetes Management and Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Population and Public Health; University of Calgary","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; Disadvantaged; Medicine; Health care; Diabetes mellitus; Population; Ethical issues; Glycated haemoglobin; Type 2 diabetes; Intensive care medicine; Engineering ethics; Political science; Environmental health; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.3755771195750681,"score_gpt":0.43792921914682753,"score_spread":0.06235209957175941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159244155","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40834236,0.00522065,0.32529575,0.24149403,0.0026466781,0.004161277,0.000017422306,0.0001810174,0.012640808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74290305,0.00021575125,0.24969253,0.005122499,0.0013046649,0.000029253037,0.000015703157,0.00005736381,0.00065920356],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963879,0.00016977065,0.0005114707,0.00014197822,0.00242016,0.00036870778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912721,0.005936961,0.00027729876,0.00014035014,0.0018900605,0.00048323354],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014838581,0.00011586093,0.00034444034,0.00017484368,0.00020615137,0.00002797978,0.00025033933,0.0008951553,0.00010159339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051165998,0.00007372121,0.000114821814,0.00027156397,0.00025227375,0.00008842072,0.000055050612,0.004751571,0.000003902415],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0096901385,0.002862861,0.38811427,0.012282099,0.0053656828,0.0005428101,0.010641096,0.00007162178,0.00088519976,0.065276,0.04428011,0.45998812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.07148202,0.06788644,0.22971599,0.046949025,0.0073170112,0.0002888639,0.0070306375,0.079936475,0.005221309,0.11793581,0.36394545,0.0022909634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000032065725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000052417463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45769715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032416494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088225666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159494371","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2013-101458","title":"The challenge of crafting policy for do-it-yourself brain stimulation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"NeuroDevNet; University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of British Columbia; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Transcranial direct-current stimulation; Public relations; Computer science; Cognition; Stimulation; Political science; Psychology; Internet privacy; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.12839784542904648,"score_gpt":0.42413598404647257,"score_spread":0.2957381386174261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159494371","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04233205,0.00051392405,0.023180509,0.93118304,0.00084537454,0.00051876664,0.0000049719097,0.000017674784,0.0014037132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99408066,0.00079012883,0.00073016895,0.0035916893,0.0006956288,0.000010026129,9.0182176e-8,0.000010946452,0.00009068648],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996099,0.0003284105,0.00077941484,0.000117658456,0.00245636,0.00021916107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97423995,0.024119645,0.0005125025,0.00014605864,0.000808444,0.0001734217],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044682124,0.00009844773,0.00023786677,0.00009791334,0.00027891714,0.00004667226,0.000438131,0.00031568008,0.00012028398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09763471,0.000060749928,0.00013760077,0.00020523112,0.00043338977,0.00012648864,0.00004693303,0.0011810468,0.000006171081],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085040834,0.0008639001,0.0005851698,0.0008054253,0.00016660542,0.000034021723,0.06060399,0.0051780785,0.06276281,0.40340188,0.015967516,0.4487802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02564762,0.008096173,0.039965164,0.002963751,0.00031039058,0.00030835287,0.006533896,0.11184912,0.0048707123,0.5109359,0.28736398,0.001154954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000040247633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015650005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9517486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033699147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009099184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9099663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159759625","doi":"10.1136/jme.2008.024299","title":"A comparison of journal instructions regarding institutional review board approval and conflict-of-interest disclosure between 1995 and 2005","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cancer Care Nova Scotia; Western University; Dalhousie University; Izaak Walton Killam Health Centre; Capital District Health Authority","funders":"","keywords":"Institutional review board; Conflict of interest; Ethics committee; Declaration of Helsinki; Medicine; Declaration; Editorial board; Family medicine; Medical journal; Library science; Political science; Alternative medicine; Informed consent; Law; Pathology; Computer science; Surgery","score_opus":0.8127877249082347,"score_gpt":0.6408262816142971,"score_spread":0.1719614432939376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159759625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8769395,0.057525173,0.0005496862,0.062853165,0.0014479955,0.0001982929,0.00005636685,0.00000871189,0.00042111237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8822662,0.1139989,0.000456858,0.0022597727,0.00097080227,0.0000013146243,0.0000035499677,0.000007767249,0.000034833658],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958292,0.0011290571,0.001536289,0.00013706126,0.0010726139,0.00029574838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99535066,0.0017863557,0.00096178317,0.00008374841,0.00066093926,0.0011564904],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075509516,0.00017103026,0.00086429744,0.00013857201,0.0004530644,0.00000961559,0.0003109818,0.0014753193,0.0003985738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041064196,0.00013251614,0.00015545718,0.00016408479,0.002079472,0.00018895241,0.00012034034,0.0133636845,0.0000012639364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018941525,0.0019206663,0.7095314,0.017777303,0.0030879881,0.0013001761,0.01289209,0.00012383149,0.0022172963,0.03985967,0.07586025,0.13353516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0075572478,0.0011449455,0.025194641,0.010814954,0.0016021915,0.015914913,0.0012360477,0.0008791303,0.0033140315,0.0018999102,0.929973,0.00046898663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013347967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016250764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85411274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054068376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001865543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159796110","doi":"10.1136/jme.26.4.295","title":"Truth and the Child 10 years on: Information Exchange in Donor Assisted Conception","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Hospital for Sick Children; SickKids Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Anonymity; Donor insemination; Freedom of information; Association (psychology); Law; Sociology; Political science; Library science; Artificial insemination; Psychology; Computer science; Biology; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.04666545340649797,"score_gpt":0.36194002622399823,"score_spread":0.31527457281750026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159796110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6682215,0.0014316686,0.0000387221,0.3242137,0.0002577482,0.00020260288,0.0000010048321,0.000018256555,0.005614793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802375,0.012241297,0.000111637426,0.006983882,0.00036372372,0.0000031408024,0.0000017250865,0.0000027707235,0.000054361164],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830586,0.00012905058,0.000369638,0.000051720763,0.0010459975,0.000097712305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990382,0.0004824411,0.0001479703,0.00010163844,0.00012780384,0.000101918136],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004448278,0.000049746588,0.00019508181,0.00010324026,0.00004181059,0.000011023548,0.000079989484,0.00041166705,0.00048426783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009510835,0.000027259379,0.00003597149,0.00013482015,0.00036954152,0.000104014485,0.00001230572,0.0024918297,0.00001544168],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021128373,0.00008723412,0.00047029805,0.00018422946,0.000023346744,0.000057627847,0.003388282,0.0000028729703,0.0000012320284,0.0055252374,0.002625885,0.9855209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.022974376,0.0019988138,0.37032184,0.0022757463,0.000074407115,0.0019928087,0.002393142,0.0003420557,0.000058028134,0.0042083017,0.59321743,0.00014305615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002082445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007855867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98537785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038265433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029044168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160119656","doi":"10.1136/jme.26.2.126","title":"Paying research subjects: participants' perspectives","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Informed consent; Clinical trial; Psychology; Medicine; Family medicine; Alternative medicine; Medical education; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.7970960143689667,"score_gpt":0.7061380627299125,"score_spread":0.09095795163905418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160119656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5726455,0.0039945096,0.0001799106,0.402888,0.00032691794,0.00018889052,0.0000014617193,0.000026822276,0.019747997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9367584,0.05297126,0.0011917427,0.0042352416,0.0017748532,0.000002423354,5.0397017e-7,0.000027976885,0.0030375973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9737052,0.0019630233,0.0013108643,0.00031785047,0.02180362,0.0008994591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7617586,0.21245466,0.0004904059,0.0014006278,0.018723404,0.0051722983],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.15305851,0.00013536256,0.000570493,0.00030181775,0.0002927022,0.00006875781,0.0008207083,0.00284178,0.011587758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5103409,0.00009396116,0.0002789133,0.0007098427,0.002222946,0.00013115715,0.00015857778,0.050678473,0.00026334837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011901154,0.010332964,0.02323036,0.0061895405,0.0021616563,0.028804045,0.19975974,0.000053407468,0.0024550676,0.4584131,0.0504242,0.20627476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.021923462,0.016847214,0.030599767,0.028990386,0.0005959585,0.006274183,0.12649515,0.0016238495,0.003397924,0.55593365,0.20622285,0.001095599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013376515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026115857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39865276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026232903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016946612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160442946","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2012-100545","title":"Commentary on ‘Biodefence and the production of knowledge: rethinking the problem’","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Biosecurity; Politics; Knowledge production; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Production (economics); Engineering ethics; Data science; Political science; Law; Computer science; Medicine; Philosophy; Economics; Knowledge management","score_opus":0.04220866825132614,"score_gpt":0.3343971719084531,"score_spread":0.29218850365712695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160442946","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003333709,0.006092027,0.00008721509,0.9887617,0.0012072064,0.00018887634,0.000004955503,0.0000010675627,0.00032321844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.118966185,0.03377828,0.00025389114,0.8131735,0.033151936,0.000011867256,0.000038421942,0.00004125117,0.00058468396],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99636054,0.0010883086,0.00047157577,0.00014420664,0.0017236273,0.00021173304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770766,0.00092890253,0.00045383096,0.00028082155,0.00055006816,0.00007873972],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013494468,0.00014206432,0.00028892956,0.000036067297,0.00015793282,0.000024571777,0.00062298385,0.0017160394,0.000031759067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004282621,0.00006439184,0.00014161307,0.000063894244,0.0013543738,0.0000036157257,0.00022241368,0.008308543,0.0000013277038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003527333,0.000050711475,0.000019173085,0.00040743515,0.00015179126,0.000009441662,0.0015061578,7.411781e-7,0.0017782872,0.00019836388,0.98782235,0.0077028037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054947607,0.0002741568,0.00002154275,0.0006644915,0.00006824625,0.00014574453,0.000042856707,0.0000049158243,0.0016823072,0.00094742276,0.9955171,0.00008177577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028587294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022266851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17558824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016594524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006004785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161498239","doi":"10.1136/jme.2010.041350","title":"What does ‘respect for persons’ require? Attitudes and reported practices of genetics researchers in informing research participants about research","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Health Canada; Genome Canada","keywords":"Obligation; Psychology; Field (mathematics); Medical education; Public relations; Social psychology; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.9509581661780104,"score_gpt":0.7509953887510706,"score_spread":0.1999627774269398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161498239","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9245939,0.00812091,0.000062483814,0.06470531,0.00047197298,0.00088041753,0.0000042803645,0.000009460048,0.0011512574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8681547,0.1244233,0.005701677,0.00037796248,0.00049608725,0.000031010244,0.0000014367071,0.000038553906,0.0007752866],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9612774,0.0044644363,0.0033884854,0.00064656936,0.028411955,0.001811129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5389022,0.41174227,0.0032752757,0.0021452843,0.03951287,0.0044220807],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.38919407,0.00017937584,0.0008503905,0.0013625945,0.00031396083,0.0001651367,0.001095339,0.0028080894,0.00025320356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7713749,0.00012006589,0.00018643819,0.0012315285,0.0056657637,0.0008533473,0.0007986417,0.032317307,0.0000037909867],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.037266336,0.008191008,0.4152732,0.05074977,0.0026263949,0.013532359,0.30191204,0.0000069989806,0.012779155,0.08774121,0.003273506,0.06664803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02224127,0.028339002,0.17530908,0.10790057,0.00041260725,0.0018523249,0.27652034,0.002242176,0.030908208,0.3272441,0.026053179,0.0009771435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00079880725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072265645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4223752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002935268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020987729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99848646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162252291","doi":"10.1136/jme.2006.019224","title":"Terminal sedation and the “imminence condition”","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Sinai Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Sedation; Palliative sedation; Assertion; Palliative care; Terminal care; Medicine; Terminal (telecommunication); Intensive care medicine; Psychology; Anesthesia; Nursing; Computer science","score_opus":0.19931221612914443,"score_gpt":0.4871061675887391,"score_spread":0.28779395145959463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162252291","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8646829,0.005060734,0.0041265152,0.12418104,0.00036115767,0.000083937266,0.000002671875,0.000005705636,0.0014953472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97255063,0.021642195,0.0010852198,0.004089983,0.0004989611,6.510435e-7,0.000002192894,0.0000033715826,0.00012678438],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99781704,0.00013148176,0.0003448666,0.000044820415,0.0015947646,0.00006705378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973026,0.0017660047,0.00022817536,0.00006367354,0.00049753475,0.00014204206],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002540613,0.000050305076,0.00023627438,0.000043983484,0.000060003225,0.0000032655928,0.00008776615,0.0002340923,0.00012592699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011110947,0.000026658661,0.000065198234,0.000068642345,0.0008671662,0.000056391316,0.000018506471,0.0013314958,0.0000024277779],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010949309,0.0018421994,0.30458036,0.0044197794,0.0020935733,0.016519142,0.28707385,0.000031116037,0.003925605,0.12127175,0.14543967,0.10185363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05917377,0.004318184,0.1773795,0.024565615,0.001514887,0.05026574,0.017485633,0.0035375792,0.010902973,0.016928105,0.63331443,0.0006135836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002352412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000051566044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48787475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014011271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007041645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162812126","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2013-101534","title":"Should we perform kidney transplants on foreign nationals?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Interim; Transplantation; Organ donation; Medicine; Refugee; Political science; Health care; Politics; CLARITY; Public relations; Public administration; Law; Surgery","score_opus":0.09240396224578429,"score_gpt":0.3785419289510917,"score_spread":0.2861379667053074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162812126","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16552472,0.0002598427,0.0042739855,0.8039353,0.00097088335,0.0003282949,0.000018696459,0.000039744387,0.024648512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9655386,0.0036725933,0.0005979694,0.029237108,0.0005830079,0.0000024081094,0.000020131689,0.0000129158725,0.00033525997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950546,0.00007691102,0.0005040732,0.000087916334,0.004133972,0.00014250976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977204,0.00070263667,0.00016218032,0.00007770768,0.0006847564,0.00065230863],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020957147,0.000102819,0.00023085908,0.00019484365,0.0000704604,0.000021773778,0.000143886,0.0006516177,0.007824063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002506924,0.000069354355,0.00012108973,0.00012381728,0.00009104099,0.00015614204,0.000004326309,0.0027616615,0.000145408],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036844292,0.0053854682,0.036513302,0.007353957,0.0020196289,0.0030262396,0.027562622,0.00008799089,0.0066536986,0.43071163,0.26807606,0.20892495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.06953494,0.01057116,0.30549967,0.03182534,0.0020538012,0.019604307,0.0048977826,0.019303642,0.03788607,0.071274616,0.42577577,0.0017729129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011852422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000057608213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8000139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052439922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014527636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163817877","doi":"10.1136/jme.2009.033142","title":"Ethics committees for biomedical research in some African emerging countries: which establishment for which independence? A comparison with the USA and Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Georgetown University","keywords":"Research ethics; Independence (probability theory); Context (archaeology); Ethics committee; Medical ethics; Underdevelopment; Political science; Compromise; Medicine; Public administration; Economic growth; Law; Geography; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.34833967613647676,"score_gpt":0.5714392614360654,"score_spread":0.22309958529958862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163817877","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21398062,0.0003745095,0.002080885,0.7817222,0.0007707328,0.0008886534,0.000026762733,0.000006519251,0.00014915579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851137,0.0029424783,0.003110683,0.007308387,0.0013063552,0.00007592352,0.0000073803903,0.00003805629,0.00009705257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.972662,0.0011381018,0.0015925496,0.00045225234,0.023126129,0.0010290006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.47013667,0.4932985,0.0011102548,0.0012165923,0.031046353,0.0031916173],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.18414341,0.0002361438,0.00088582264,0.000401471,0.00071451353,0.00016753579,0.001307705,0.0037526668,0.00009828926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3709048,0.00013802217,0.00008417603,0.0009516379,0.0027066367,0.00016252376,0.0003586588,0.071474545,8.366084e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.016572248,0.004045138,0.23435555,0.02155677,0.0015334892,0.001331686,0.06750553,0.00008339627,0.0007431911,0.52941996,0.11342332,0.009429733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.025206113,0.012859113,0.019100888,0.013755508,0.00043731974,0.0012248093,0.059644282,0.011073541,0.00057911355,0.07521838,0.7799364,0.00096453103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14206572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98356277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84149706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003617322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08586215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99754065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164662575","doi":"10.1136/jme.2007.020891","title":"Clinical ethicists’ perspectives on organisational ethics in healthcare organisations","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"St Joseph's Health Centre; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nursing ethics; Health care; Business ethics; Information ethics; Organizational ethics; Clinical Ethics; Engineering ethics; Applied ethics; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.38614826907656,"score_gpt":0.6209770775702546,"score_spread":0.23482880849369453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164662575","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058416665,0.0007450148,0.004970951,0.92606235,0.0045922045,0.0004429288,0.00000989902,0.00005739498,0.0047026263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84125257,0.018187242,0.005218077,0.13107508,0.003915975,0.000015237847,0.0000060672473,0.00005432088,0.0002753971],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9489806,0.032305032,0.0037845864,0.0004644383,0.013758863,0.00070643297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.66572624,0.32096663,0.0026291152,0.00072780997,0.008118128,0.001832072],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1691974,0.0002702188,0.00086220563,0.00039173977,0.002311977,0.000013086641,0.0011249273,0.009517368,0.0029816178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.70394623,0.0002193366,0.0002321233,0.0007438226,0.0023835376,0.0002655242,0.00025025036,0.18903512,0.00036296362],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042756446,0.0014232607,0.042471074,0.0005930703,0.000114842005,0.001125601,0.25539652,0.000019949704,0.00001669668,0.67903215,0.018723,0.0006562512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013762182,0.0033963542,0.22173373,0.010192051,0.00016754035,0.0015351885,0.27226073,0.00036166765,0.000019222773,0.28478938,0.19062369,0.0011582638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008439743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011788022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7949872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089046464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053058732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165057324","doi":"10.1136/jme.2009.034900","title":"The ethical professional as endangered person: blog notes on doctor–patient relationships","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Innovations in Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Set (abstract data type); Confusion; Narrative; Burnout; Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Social media; Social psychology; Public relations; Political science; Law; Psychoanalysis; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.09258695591778131,"score_gpt":0.43638039950417506,"score_spread":0.34379344358639374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165057324","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42445198,0.000071736744,0.00016919039,0.567819,0.0055141062,0.0001413104,8.8399463e-7,0.000015154893,0.0018166517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95731765,0.000165983,0.0030927102,0.036152117,0.0028217346,0.00001129542,0.000008693479,0.000019482937,0.00041035053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910851,0.00061774434,0.00088204525,0.00016473643,0.006968781,0.00028158064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836641,0.01210734,0.0006500303,0.00043088256,0.002579909,0.0005677365],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018121274,0.00015664172,0.0002886878,0.00017338019,0.0007256338,0.00003890194,0.0003856291,0.0027548238,0.0010984689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24697466,0.000084103885,0.00016068511,0.0003923336,0.00091726467,0.000055791552,0.000049079503,0.038950533,0.00009193807],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011198932,0.00171693,0.0035997469,0.00022024351,0.0002640819,0.00042498411,0.024758607,0.000004543641,0.0016020577,0.7068956,0.13874982,0.120643474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046049063,0.003115529,0.033208407,0.0032438638,0.0003047515,0.005392715,0.0142763145,0.0013425399,0.0018278497,0.02889685,0.90333366,0.00045262332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012843188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037806945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7645838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012491089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005557861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165237771","doi":"10.1136/jme.2007.023481","title":"Hopes for Helsinki: reconsidering “vulnerability”","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Data science; Computer science; Political science; Psychology; Computer security","score_opus":0.7997176764814634,"score_gpt":0.6373667470744877,"score_spread":0.1623509294069757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165237771","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21409152,0.0017519627,0.020510267,0.75983447,0.0015637652,0.00036121078,0.0000042001598,0.000034682653,0.0018479413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8458612,0.040026322,0.05188309,0.054651733,0.0049706367,0.000013659078,0.0000028268255,0.0000653697,0.0025251643],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98962164,0.0003767446,0.0013112429,0.00021016,0.008125111,0.000355103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8203213,0.16799322,0.00063633855,0.00065084954,0.008433302,0.00196494],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.055631455,0.00012301187,0.00060992135,0.00014812878,0.00023596849,0.000017656712,0.0004326589,0.0026392364,0.0005492524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6075111,0.00008845148,0.0003861371,0.00017673754,0.0011347093,0.00009467686,0.0001234292,0.021250263,0.000015205146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015295168,0.010676596,0.056797802,0.034656167,0.0039503654,0.026483832,0.046966627,0.0001397735,0.0072121387,0.22715282,0.33832416,0.23234454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017054798,0.008450926,0.006140999,0.010251096,0.00035669171,0.020306775,0.0012273883,0.0010111519,0.008539587,0.37726587,0.5487547,0.0006400322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024311405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017003214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70518273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011239293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013911963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99865556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166034247","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2013-101614","title":"Veracity and rhetoric in paediatric medicine: a critique of Svoboda and Van Howe's response to the AAP policy on infant male circumcision","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Genital Health and Disease","field":"Medicine","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific evidence; Rhetoric; Citation; Interpretation (philosophy); Medicine; Alternative medicine; Evidence-based policy; Male circumcision; Psychology; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Population; Computer science; Environmental health; Pathology","score_opus":0.03173726424596425,"score_gpt":0.3988932693223094,"score_spread":0.36715600507634516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166034247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7280636,0.0022634706,0.000069989444,0.26901162,0.00015497029,0.00022895413,0.0000030498056,0.0000028076433,0.00020158676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768615,0.0022717225,0.000097385055,0.020036003,0.0006666027,0.000005067108,6.1180964e-7,0.000008432926,0.000052673277],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962,0.0006192397,0.00069992896,0.00013551407,0.0020995173,0.00024576293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933217,0.0041815042,0.00021036074,0.00019505246,0.0005717409,0.0015196085],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008146249,0.0001219525,0.0004054954,0.00047783303,0.00006492912,0.000011171403,0.00015023877,0.00043986327,0.00015934066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06468975,0.00006881894,0.00005300994,0.00045998025,0.00023399142,0.00007940138,0.00007196056,0.0023275383,0.0000071482004],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07450437,0.0049172556,0.30906057,0.014761847,0.00021665238,0.007096362,0.089077346,0.000087145854,0.0067291316,0.022389099,0.13656332,0.3345969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008457284,0.0069851917,0.95868504,0.0019778074,0.000103169245,0.0019322875,0.002122758,0.0003295643,0.000069102694,0.0081198085,0.01102507,0.00019292579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008459147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006093371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64962447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008077438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029971309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166062050","doi":"10.1136/jme.2010.035501","title":"Enhancing the fairness of pandemic critical care triage","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Disaster Response and Management","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Triage; Pandemic; Context (archaeology); Health care; Health care rationing; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); H1n1 pandemic; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Medicine; Medical emergency; Law; History","score_opus":0.150414184831343,"score_gpt":0.5521585415683361,"score_spread":0.4017443567369931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166062050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8277257,0.00082165224,0.02302475,0.12712109,0.009014341,0.00038143416,0.000006201508,0.000024773963,0.011880034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99297297,0.00026002465,0.00024667758,0.005300501,0.000933517,0.0000050524704,4.4611167e-7,0.000009044169,0.00027175684],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951027,0.0012907481,0.0009401703,0.00007816629,0.0023367591,0.00025147953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98787177,0.010514117,0.0003448517,0.00022787848,0.0007844464,0.00025693723],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017555589,0.00007930421,0.0002858286,0.0000720869,0.000271672,0.000007808271,0.0005607711,0.0007915405,0.0011361508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041805353,0.00004316699,0.000118992844,0.00010417656,0.00031138724,0.000069621536,0.00019006127,0.009261652,0.000023621487],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014903168,0.00051667664,0.0071423654,0.0076915836,0.00026671134,0.0005106073,0.4509441,0.000002811995,0.009621184,0.44783163,0.023227101,0.050754916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005252488,0.0006574209,0.006205883,0.0049932864,0.00038789556,0.0001263283,0.35983926,0.00006272345,0.00083668926,0.017270181,0.6040766,0.0002912029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000063241496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008824934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5808495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028619806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025752017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166542121","doi":"10.1136/jme.2002.002170","title":"Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Reproduction; Reproductive technology; Legislature; Germline; Government (linguistics); Emerging technologies; Law; Political science; Internet privacy; Biology; Embryo; Genetics; Computer science","score_opus":0.08314540064738266,"score_gpt":0.3739440652895189,"score_spread":0.2907986646421362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166542121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7826643,0.018303374,0.00010939868,0.19846392,0.00015528675,0.00021287007,0.0000021979074,0.000031899064,0.000056735844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97042257,0.027449287,0.0011767861,0.0007459243,0.00017726672,0.000003063086,0.0000014942829,0.000010946938,0.000012682446],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796134,0.00008998507,0.0004805393,0.0003346703,0.0009381329,0.00019535937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983378,0.00027735025,0.00044218785,0.00031007003,0.0004495931,0.00018300852],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044233054,0.00013466852,0.00038328426,0.00032698046,0.00013758664,0.000014484321,0.00008852026,0.00056935736,0.000004710423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0178925,0.00009564053,0.000033263725,0.00019934251,0.00087054406,0.00009470815,0.000045104625,0.00230089,2.3587482e-7],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001652291,0.000527745,0.03742683,0.0007893684,0.00047315026,0.00027601395,0.009019565,0.000033257795,0.006114181,0.020451376,0.00025277847,0.92298347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.029205525,0.033646926,0.4706821,0.010836538,0.0007137374,0.015932111,0.036823284,0.00033955564,0.13624002,0.17521243,0.089072265,0.0012954964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002832783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004694972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92168796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010903813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088333455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166557932","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2012-101282","title":"Legislative regulation and ethical governance of medical research in different European Union countries","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; European union; Legislature; Appeal; Corporate governance; Political science; Medical research; Informed consent; Public relations; Research ethics; Public administration; Law; Medicine; Business; International trade; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.4459220898785673,"score_gpt":0.5965759319381693,"score_spread":0.15065384205960197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166557932","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29257515,0.001017362,0.001129083,0.7009813,0.00026697436,0.00023535239,0.0000019432568,0.0000066395132,0.0037861539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.960641,0.035459988,0.00034024165,0.0025643953,0.00073626044,0.0000027124527,0.00000160233,0.0000204717,0.00023331039],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9516866,0.008116566,0.0022460506,0.00034635628,0.03706909,0.00053531607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.789987,0.19278277,0.0012938905,0.0008626267,0.012274711,0.0027989855],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.17622311,0.000149311,0.00071746,0.00025523797,0.00009695989,0.000046196914,0.000698465,0.004087553,0.0012774616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.33756062,0.00009720972,0.00011409822,0.0004182049,0.0036905613,0.00011534932,0.0005361612,0.04843295,0.0000203592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011608322,0.0014719163,0.06416751,0.0059097367,0.00028175503,0.0019858812,0.01722326,0.000008201531,0.0007570347,0.8262854,0.013060165,0.067688294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00851051,0.003479703,0.738547,0.034133177,0.000057326764,0.0006295646,0.0017960441,0.003030944,0.00058377476,0.193363,0.01559334,0.00027556345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006944112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010690804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69841695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019378212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005909054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168098734","doi":"10.1136/jme.2003.005330","title":"The Olivieri debacle: where were the heroes of bioethics?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Silence; Duty; Nothing; Meaning (existential); Power (physics); Value (mathematics); Law; Sociology; Medicine; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.1774056932164976,"score_gpt":0.56040810910649,"score_spread":0.3830024158899924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168098734","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009793669,0.008134311,0.0035859488,0.9656083,0.0051188623,0.00027312833,0.0000037883897,0.000020611178,0.007461364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8058191,0.12523001,0.0024928339,0.06110317,0.004464707,0.00001587472,9.3830386e-7,0.000065019936,0.00080831954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9769415,0.010267564,0.0022536432,0.00017446517,0.009733649,0.00062917813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83459544,0.15743391,0.0027588825,0.0008144387,0.0036002232,0.00079707167],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1321196,0.00019136684,0.00049881224,0.00006173265,0.0026968054,0.000029853023,0.0022037101,0.003415202,0.00081908423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32525304,0.000086526314,0.00023920348,0.0003520918,0.00514531,0.00019015833,0.00041961457,0.07531004,0.00009385678],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027231997,0.0002684289,0.00062729436,0.0011851228,0.0002910784,0.00018004638,0.039650567,0.000033756212,0.00007357278,0.9169017,0.030102985,0.010413132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002647331,0.00047520833,0.0007317337,0.007448124,0.00019038319,0.00026819168,0.08549821,0.00004270374,0.000103437356,0.41496253,0.4874377,0.00019447436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007555599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004793885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90450513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018719526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014749737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99860156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168630785","doi":"10.1136/jme.2002.002204","title":"Students’ attitudes and potential behaviour to a competent patient’s request for withdrawal of treatment as they pass through a modern medical curriculum","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"University of Glasgow","keywords":"Vignette; Curriculum; Autonomy; Medical education; Psychology; Perspective (graphical); Cohort; Medicine; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.08111209571458937,"score_gpt":0.518351760212072,"score_spread":0.4372396644974826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168630785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7943887,0.00057798217,0.023355551,0.17761508,0.0025430212,0.0011576901,0.000026952568,0.000029508103,0.00030549045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734091,0.0032979061,0.008364853,0.013810369,0.0009740682,0.000065591266,0.0000061774354,0.000038200185,0.000033692784],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98466945,0.0024832233,0.0020871493,0.00035511242,0.0097910995,0.0006139717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859078,0.008729559,0.0012849886,0.00034492172,0.0021086826,0.0016240773],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.019049287,0.00029564413,0.000891071,0.0001229777,0.000733359,0.000027268641,0.00088930136,0.002333785,0.00026780012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062058553,0.00019809068,0.00022982551,0.00013927976,0.00065965607,0.00022979418,0.00046240998,0.012074271,0.00001615492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0051686475,0.02711221,0.1976069,0.006517302,0.0034881427,0.005538327,0.42508814,0.00083146483,0.00049615355,0.29877177,0.007004563,0.022376347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.09687866,0.07341356,0.040880978,0.06664354,0.0041931774,0.0048230654,0.096753225,0.0011334162,0.0003471907,0.56759053,0.044574875,0.0027677712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029927788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025106084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32833493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061642367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01003311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169045788","doi":"10.1136/jme.2011.042374","title":"The ‘patient's physician one-step removed’: the evolving roles of medical tourism facilitators: Table 1","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Global Healthcare and Medical Tourism","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Table (database); Medical tourism; Data science; Tourism; Medicine; World Wide Web; Computer science; Data mining; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1260173989521844,"score_gpt":0.4433813667081079,"score_spread":0.3173639677559235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169045788","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1355548,0.029264053,0.0050024297,0.75160426,0.016078921,0.0014059901,0.00005004741,0.00010001417,0.060939446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86602515,0.036672372,0.0020822994,0.083375886,0.010051339,0.00005109369,0.0000052773084,0.000091622176,0.001644975],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98211294,0.0033221948,0.0022830656,0.00020679692,0.01117843,0.00089656515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858741,0.008867466,0.0014454998,0.0005419964,0.0018323143,0.0014386034],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.030176943,0.00022215239,0.0006761675,0.00007661675,0.0012580752,0.000013704854,0.0018656155,0.0022990475,0.001280585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04642856,0.00010986503,0.00027867855,0.00036948395,0.001107719,0.00015898579,0.00045617536,0.014888352,0.000053664007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044156855,0.0007950434,0.0016354909,0.0013546613,0.00046323973,0.00054071954,0.061225027,9.37736e-7,0.000029897712,0.051681615,0.62225395,0.25957784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018503896,0.000916228,0.0040888265,0.008958757,0.00014833678,0.000078550074,0.054126263,0.0005134711,0.000085272055,0.022919202,0.9060519,0.00026282345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023469815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013184751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73047036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015802425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009277786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169201579","doi":"10.1136/jme.2007.023051","title":"Physicians as healthcare surrogate for terminally ill children","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terminally ill; Ambivalence; Grief; Feeling; Dilemma; Anxiety; Altruism (biology); Psychology; Health care; Moral dilemma; Palliative care; Medicine; Nursing; Social psychology; Law; Psychotherapist; Psychiatry; Political science","score_opus":0.07854023160783233,"score_gpt":0.44217310137203103,"score_spread":0.36363286976419873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169201579","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43984684,0.0063603497,0.0009123886,0.55034405,0.0013638427,0.00042192047,0.000022791954,0.000033298486,0.00069452164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9048532,0.022785282,0.00343429,0.06253592,0.005803339,0.000005535395,0.000014466349,0.000040374973,0.0005275662],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938348,0.0002686534,0.0009913283,0.0002046625,0.0042685345,0.00043202654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931601,0.0018789353,0.0005097006,0.00025078564,0.0032531,0.00094736903],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00647669,0.0001831968,0.0006854258,0.00015093366,0.000291262,0.000013166797,0.00037216657,0.0016195608,0.00009376844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018838653,0.00014105947,0.00036504824,0.00022383792,0.0003919045,0.00009128756,0.00005265435,0.008074714,0.000015172172],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0059208036,0.005178113,0.20079789,0.01672587,0.0022449554,0.024314497,0.15126511,0.000026543561,0.00025979287,0.091274105,0.124363855,0.37762848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.025096625,0.023553189,0.105070785,0.014024228,0.0012643397,0.06163359,0.0048346985,0.00054548075,0.0010465878,0.027592406,0.7337601,0.0015779578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046907493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009768825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6093963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011309713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00841104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169523438","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2011-100461","title":"Ethics policy review: a case study in quality improvement","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Hamilton Health Sciences; McMaster University Medical Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Context (archaeology); Quality (philosophy); Publication; Best practice; Public relations; Health care; Process (computing); Engineering ethics; Quality management; Sociology; Political science; Business; Computer science; Engineering; Law; Marketing","score_opus":0.4424215357047506,"score_gpt":0.6902163520874726,"score_spread":0.24779481638272194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169523438","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14301188,0.01354408,0.0014579007,0.83075124,0.0052495,0.0014307803,0.000004944431,0.00003488911,0.004514763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.748932,0.04402247,0.0006954831,0.20208813,0.004052556,0.000034731056,8.025804e-7,0.00002967093,0.00014415529],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9256965,0.052786212,0.0050530373,0.00028794227,0.014946574,0.0012297638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7659718,0.22004412,0.0045255804,0.0012044803,0.0048010917,0.0034529672],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.45213172,0.00023978615,0.00095377676,0.00027791894,0.00089278875,0.000010808104,0.0008407999,0.0038412684,0.0011856997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7285242,0.0001734444,0.00017203917,0.0007164096,0.00049498735,0.00041756322,0.00055100746,0.12974843,0.000099405144],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046523643,0.011847131,0.10631396,0.038335975,0.00053166476,0.018448174,0.5880158,0.0000023182495,0.000053211952,0.13899174,0.054356378,0.042638425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013685154,0.0026511338,0.010496106,0.0461305,0.0006608051,0.006642826,0.49455068,0.00004229545,0.000008839587,0.025608655,0.39849296,0.0010300492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009015501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005977221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6286631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007373845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019638695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171039126","doi":"10.1136/jme.2005.013672","title":"Just another drug? A philosophical assessment of randomised controlled studies on intercessory prayer","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Guelph","keywords":"Prayer; Skepticism; Causation; Epistemology; Psychology; Informed consent; Alternative medicine; Medicine; Social psychology; Law; Philosophy; Theology; Political science","score_opus":0.27866474930949114,"score_gpt":0.5590394934707538,"score_spread":0.2803747441612626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171039126","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000046286084,0.91157764,0.000109965426,0.06892651,0.0035768766,0.00076357205,0.0000058015144,0.000011712651,0.014981631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006147215,0.99123627,0.00008598926,0.0038189206,0.003765084,0.000028290047,0.0000022144754,0.000026312147,0.00042221884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812617,0.009052807,0.0031677075,0.00028368997,0.005886431,0.0003476734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9759811,0.018868133,0.003381055,0.00025532217,0.0012132492,0.00030111795],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04579348,0.00036387576,0.004575919,0.0003319954,0.00021985419,0.000041591305,0.0010961477,0.0027702868,0.00023151407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02378893,0.00021609839,0.0015657134,0.00028370396,0.001996276,0.000061125,0.00006941804,0.0070608407,0.000008117858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0070306812,0.005968203,0.000048772647,0.046296004,0.01421696,0.0012961855,0.08215362,0.00001315623,6.8403193e-7,0.30581027,0.27545053,0.2617149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02401435,0.00029027127,0.0000031565262,0.022111118,0.0015796182,0.00003679839,0.0016780868,0.0000013575651,9.268689e-8,0.0075889253,0.94244516,0.00025107973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021595403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006264379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66699463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023921774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006703256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99892783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171515846","doi":"10.1136/jme.27.3.186","title":"Doctors' authoritarianism in end-of-life treatment decisions. A comparison between Russia, Sweden and Germany","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"German; Authoritarianism; Dementia; Psychological intervention; Compliance (psychology); Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Psychology; Legal guardian; Medicine; Family medicine; Psychiatry; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Resuscitation; Disease; Emergency medicine; Democracy","score_opus":0.3071656737001744,"score_gpt":0.5114296022961546,"score_spread":0.20426392859598025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171515846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96461475,0.009933342,0.0016934032,0.022476666,0.00030161816,0.00012052048,0.000008212024,0.0000066521425,0.0008448384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9709301,0.024293464,0.0037147466,0.00040783986,0.00058126455,0.000001311043,0.0000050287103,0.000011293098,0.00005497281],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957233,0.0002675114,0.0013485734,0.00014044059,0.0023000527,0.0002201021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939422,0.0043811365,0.00051447627,0.00016266758,0.00032996596,0.0006695321],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003303416,0.000164431,0.001088316,0.00027551706,0.00004045549,0.000009168786,0.000186036,0.00076561165,0.00022079835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0100717945,0.00011105105,0.00017158501,0.00023813419,0.0003097812,0.000073515876,0.00005529071,0.0018402643,0.0000034896946],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000658452,0.00083966664,0.89616513,0.00019422336,0.00049462635,0.0010361241,0.019220464,0.0000066114085,0.00018749565,0.0026122471,0.0011887971,0.07739615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.019008504,0.0054125967,0.61810845,0.015162672,0.0009555462,0.0004991911,0.0072322376,0.00054619927,0.0016185103,0.00443256,0.32660004,0.00042347665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051067345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024310553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32541126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012570941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001777696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172097361","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2013-101891","title":"The ethics of molecular memory modification","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"SAFER; Action (physics); Computer science; Identity (music); Personal identity; Relevance (law); Duty; Engineering ethics; Cognitive science; Psychology; Computer security; Internet privacy; Social psychology; Political science; Self; Law; Engineering; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.154937551538273,"score_gpt":0.42632823031635386,"score_spread":0.2713906787780809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172097361","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066125244,0.00022887981,0.23945613,0.68663806,0.0031089599,0.00021789834,0.0000047876442,0.000039073726,0.0041809385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.973163,0.001742004,0.00072202616,0.023853421,0.00037551363,0.000003401554,5.539699e-7,0.00001828522,0.000121793986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.98891294,0.0017081884,0.001271087,0.00020874213,0.0076236483,0.00027538018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97696793,0.019536324,0.0012536563,0.00049619505,0.0014359795,0.00030993996],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02453236,0.0001316517,0.00026639385,0.00014412632,0.00038771183,0.000051123578,0.001405228,0.00096165616,0.00009279446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24334612,0.000087307024,0.00013479003,0.0005130153,0.0022868863,0.000116915115,0.00015335847,0.009992672,0.000016236168],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036671372,0.00018802637,0.0000036119009,0.00013581102,0.000017396616,0.000030240019,0.0016861527,0.000049872804,0.32036114,0.66452557,0.0016325774,0.011332937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012337957,0.0005653455,0.00010171198,0.000555803,0.000056644236,0.00015831896,0.0003832741,0.0031125424,0.7279447,0.1752286,0.09042779,0.00023152365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008792875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010235883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90703773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042146083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015761914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99229133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2187040681","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2015-102856","title":"The impact of the Rasouli decision: a Survey of Canadian intensivists","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"London Health Sciences Centre; University of British Columbia; Hôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus; University of Manitoba; St. Michael's Hospital; University of Ottawa; University of Alberta; Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre; St. Paul's Hospital; McMaster University; Dalhousie University; Western University; University of Toronto","funders":"Health Research Board; University Health Network","keywords":"Respondent; Medicine; Likert scale; Supreme court; Family medicine; Intensive care unit; Test (biology); Psychology; Intensive care medicine; Law","score_opus":0.4278762904471158,"score_gpt":0.539509851098783,"score_spread":0.11163356065166724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2187040681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95501536,0.006586206,0.00026648003,0.0359565,0.00096092443,0.000096161006,0.000024613146,0.0000017365918,0.001092019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944984,0.0042745406,0.00020663807,0.0007976697,0.00017331188,1.8933032e-7,0.0000011681208,0.0000070462465,0.000041063795],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99580896,0.0004924586,0.00073159364,0.000056816803,0.002741397,0.00016877388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861635,0.006787638,0.0005959801,0.0002790462,0.00538982,0.00078403874],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013028537,0.00008831948,0.00047935304,0.00014903452,0.000039974086,0.000005448559,0.00044547036,0.00039966393,0.000053352866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18442047,0.000036821817,0.000252917,0.000507287,0.00061245466,0.000027922724,0.000056747194,0.0019709405,0.0000014896198],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019523546,0.00025390476,0.66839975,0.00018174484,0.0010956934,0.00031112603,0.023044525,0.00006963621,0.00018730096,0.00068966625,0.2802199,0.0235944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039182766,0.0018474879,0.9221873,0.008424041,0.00019043108,0.0004986564,0.0042354697,0.00032794662,0.0009814684,0.0019494224,0.055312034,0.00012741666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1187873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.104927756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2537876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012989981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012208939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2196451608","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2015-103094","title":"Physician-assisted death does not violate professional integrity","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Data science; Medicine; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.2088888907581601,"score_gpt":0.5051792118588903,"score_spread":0.29629032110073017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2196451608","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075567723,0.0004977393,0.00039511945,0.96102273,0.028188331,0.00015655,0.00007921722,0.000035694946,0.0020678665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017139709,0.00035739542,0.0005098559,0.94724905,0.030066295,0.0000068547024,0.000043056738,0.00007557203,0.004552204],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9830734,0.0036719718,0.001835797,0.00044030062,0.010267928,0.0007105648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871676,0.007295267,0.0016709919,0.0005532257,0.0025130627,0.00079984934],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.019316154,0.00043553233,0.0012178267,0.00034395853,0.0001892207,0.00005906098,0.0015618575,0.014210277,0.0012938537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01798702,0.00023428568,0.0005234452,0.00020673496,0.00043074472,0.0000723341,0.00017796562,0.083934255,0.00023554987],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019412747,0.00025438404,0.000018176357,0.00026164,0.00029779933,0.03741702,0.002391075,1.5851516e-7,0.000004668666,0.00024588656,0.9067864,0.05212866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011107138,0.0003265055,0.00092025934,0.005817336,0.00010874364,0.0035022765,0.0007503959,0.000012070612,0.0000032255575,0.009267615,0.97785854,0.0003223057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021578903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000042950658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071072154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028196504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010793061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2218954088","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2014-102231","title":"Implications of the concept of minimal risk in research on informed choice in clinical practice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Children’s Health Research Institute; Victoria Hospital; London Health Sciences Centre; Western University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Informed consent; Clinical Practice; Computer science; Data science; Medicine; Psychology; Alternative medicine; Family medicine; Pathology","score_opus":0.8638611850490814,"score_gpt":0.7601807271145876,"score_spread":0.10368045793449376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2218954088","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5692173,0.00067959685,0.00006911228,0.41720733,0.00053937925,0.00042976416,0.000009150382,0.0000031897157,0.0118451705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872693,0.006614503,0.0018001344,0.003697766,0.00049652235,0.0000046216337,7.616928e-7,0.0000126997165,0.00010372788],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9731757,0.0056596813,0.0039282255,0.00023333379,0.016571848,0.0004312059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.27383795,0.70268685,0.0026591392,0.0013772879,0.017895024,0.0015437584],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.22103803,0.00009831699,0.00068348396,0.000374947,0.000046248977,0.000007866421,0.0012012984,0.0025879613,0.000075409705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9406232,0.000060125643,0.00022771346,0.0012436819,0.0031218424,0.00012472723,0.00041015947,0.047188744,0.0000072642674],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008927881,0.009962522,0.7416766,0.0012528424,0.00034231908,0.0003396138,0.018641045,0.00017142567,0.00007955173,0.15938807,0.027906708,0.031311393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015495364,0.007905171,0.8601032,0.009325567,0.00011176341,0.00020263497,0.010185382,0.00026007163,0.0004821011,0.054665383,0.041116264,0.00014711704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008181474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037274233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7195852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027450488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03934693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2224093505","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2013-101899","title":"Challenges with participant reimbursement: experiences from a post-trial access study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reimbursement; Attendance; Clinical trial; Medicine; Health care; Randomized controlled trial; Intervention (counseling); Family medicine; Nursing; Political science","score_opus":0.46442213105109187,"score_gpt":0.5372269198119752,"score_spread":0.07280478876088337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2224093505","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9123726,0.002721475,0.00022679087,0.0820414,0.00033916484,0.00035240952,0.0000023587052,0.00001197947,0.0019318539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996766,0.0011125861,0.00012911342,0.00056787237,0.001158598,0.000031162388,0.00000214452,0.000010004415,0.00022257182],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.991956,0.00056427723,0.0006613221,0.00015853606,0.006386326,0.00027353832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960782,0.0006272533,0.00025068663,0.00022142619,0.001495068,0.0013273894],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007565881,0.000111943955,0.00043284963,0.00014168267,0.000068059686,0.00006568791,0.0004988116,0.00028001884,0.0009408841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019529436,0.000062744606,0.00012539877,0.0001456313,0.00027251567,0.0002386791,0.0001318747,0.0026950175,0.000015699827],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.12457057,0.0228532,0.005531562,0.00035506554,0.003833001,0.012433254,0.70511764,0.000006120062,0.00016103135,0.001265334,0.052570645,0.07130257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.11820361,0.16243337,0.004092853,0.0036862574,0.000701897,0.00047972155,0.6867879,0.0002344596,0.00030557349,0.00062083564,0.022179054,0.0002744486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037297743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012285016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13958018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049458635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003244701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2252537650","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2015-102882","title":"Assessing risk/benefit for trials using preclinical evidence: a proposal","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"MEDLINE; Medicine; Data science; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.8981951468572733,"score_gpt":0.6807278648040761,"score_spread":0.2174672820531972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2252537650","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8914404,0.0022236262,0.09202584,0.012031767,0.0018895575,0.0002176089,0.0000064038077,0.000035377434,0.00012942667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90825254,0.00034761557,0.08658324,0.00045598258,0.004301255,0.0000025088557,4.815366e-7,0.00002290671,0.00003346354],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99266243,0.0019949654,0.0016288057,0.00018807025,0.0032671841,0.0002585199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9570724,0.03750798,0.0024561682,0.00017458349,0.0020185607,0.0007703044],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09015836,0.00014901107,0.000732902,0.00008700861,0.00016297742,0.00017251585,0.00050069886,0.00075984857,0.00006526338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.47453624,0.00009867876,0.0003386298,0.00011076142,0.0002617316,0.0005189482,0.00011753673,0.0038543046,0.000005383259],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.058302402,0.006283442,0.08524127,0.0051076813,0.004728824,0.00985198,0.055757355,0.0023220025,0.016226487,0.037210047,0.029368259,0.6896002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.035113238,0.061228648,0.0112992935,0.07047508,0.004149366,0.02027779,0.020081453,0.35405785,0.0015846636,0.3904338,0.02865072,0.0026481075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000072311625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000065090076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6869521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010019235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051211095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99844384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254803891","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2015-103258","title":"The EU Clinical Trials Regulation: key priorities, purposes and aims and the implications for public health","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Key (lock); Public health; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Data science; Medicine; Computer security; Nursing","score_opus":0.8544462998420712,"score_gpt":0.6229923563971077,"score_spread":0.2314539434449635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254803891","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032458454,0.015296765,0.036249146,0.943456,0.0009568659,0.00061515026,0.00007271886,0.000007145513,0.00010037074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48689383,0.2453861,0.0077593084,0.24871677,0.009818438,0.00022237928,0.000008150913,0.0000640822,0.0011309362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98445094,0.005155684,0.009318385,0.00026603116,0.00045882302,0.00035012967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8009408,0.18726692,0.009734131,0.000526753,0.0006728889,0.00085851434],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.47451624,0.000103507664,0.0011558041,0.0000927189,0.00071161415,0.00018403688,0.00040549753,0.0004643132,0.00004980646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37303433,0.000054599368,0.00020295996,0.00008038126,0.0010193349,0.00027097628,0.000068093716,0.000870885,0.000009278806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004606664,0.000022896516,0.0033486015,0.00008820928,0.000087297696,7.487244e-8,0.0011026765,1.8008481e-7,8.0802025e-8,0.9369929,0.036778156,0.02153288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034383363,0.00014448681,0.025585802,0.00016374743,0.000010653283,0.000044313158,0.00044831235,0.00023097885,8.46079e-8,0.22247517,0.747384,0.00007410706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055907578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016894069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7145177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014702418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002750871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63224685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255285643","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2015-102966","title":"Treatment-resistant major depressive disorder and assisted dying: response to comments","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Major depressive disorder; Data science; Medicine; Psychiatry; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.2283696001221638,"score_gpt":0.48289768731028077,"score_spread":0.2545280871881169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255285643","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023597833,0.008379644,0.00033177968,0.9664811,0.0005828153,0.0002382506,0.000057293568,0.000010538006,0.00032075762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010095486,0.016758468,0.004251207,0.960334,0.005160215,0.000020322517,0.000119245975,0.000121829995,0.0031392497],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930528,0.0009769131,0.0009544065,0.00023395335,0.0044664256,0.000315499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99182004,0.004944089,0.0007511784,0.00030105383,0.001438449,0.00074522174],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031829523,0.00033037458,0.0012635664,0.00036851453,0.0000710657,0.00002615525,0.0003000504,0.0025681905,0.00012188911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0232778,0.00021491859,0.00023105222,0.00018064982,0.00031032597,0.000048511112,0.00011280573,0.006048378,0.000007304104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008038773,0.00034240127,0.0029090347,0.0008522069,0.0015266294,0.014227936,0.0068671983,5.7551415e-7,0.00025295684,0.000008098952,0.9582104,0.0067637516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0073200674,0.0026453303,0.0008652174,0.0070487317,0.0008381927,0.0005142399,0.00057011173,0.000008018749,0.000114527385,0.0000640442,0.9798282,0.00018335613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020572662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000049461036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021617725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000334259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003319162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99872667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2303551499","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2015-103048","title":"Towards a bioethics of innovation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Health and Medical Research Council","keywords":"Bioethics; Scrutiny; Biomedicine; Engineering ethics; Process (computing); Sociology; Political science; Knowledge management; Computer science; Law; Engineering; Bioinformatics","score_opus":0.1357529625334057,"score_gpt":0.43971454604418825,"score_spread":0.3039615835107825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2303551499","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039677657,0.00043158335,0.08281858,0.8751757,0.00095711084,0.00007985874,0.0000037782515,0.000011898986,0.00084380363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98619294,0.0033940026,0.004291043,0.0051798527,0.000783129,4.990668e-7,0.0000020869184,0.000011342212,0.00014511374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99287045,0.00015854165,0.0011924224,0.00009085835,0.0055447468,0.00014299653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99377894,0.0010313177,0.0007421515,0.00015509268,0.0039966693,0.00029580164],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014610756,0.00008940162,0.00037383684,0.00031829285,0.000035268054,0.000005153761,0.00019238223,0.002102216,0.0004393138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026149986,0.000043826312,0.00011539477,0.0006664111,0.00246884,0.00007193232,0.00005287169,0.0030701908,0.0000045143593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041963026,0.00042336286,0.00060952833,0.00082345697,0.00018234807,0.00013866035,0.0015218471,3.249103e-7,0.025317376,0.60720575,0.0025337455,0.36082396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.027799439,0.008511195,0.033786666,0.03361514,0.00083299296,0.0045212735,0.0017560605,0.0006847809,0.095754705,0.4182643,0.37371042,0.00076300505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024524006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010055556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94651526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005919899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2305606035","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2015-103295","title":"The ambiguous nature of epigenetic responsibility","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Race, Genetics, and Society","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Institute of Genetics","keywords":"Epigenetics; Meaning (existential); Politics; Epigenesis; Field (mathematics); Biology; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Genetics; Psychology; DNA methylation; Law; Gene; Gene expression","score_opus":0.015613653159103099,"score_gpt":0.3393809866569109,"score_spread":0.3237673334978078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2305606035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94008034,0.011369624,0.004989375,0.04209172,0.0010920535,0.000069359856,0.0000075016524,0.0000024503079,0.00029759447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736997,0.02364636,0.0004106137,0.001153425,0.000652238,6.345903e-7,5.8873786e-7,0.000008946813,0.00042747555],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99721026,0.00045758465,0.0005133981,0.000136088,0.0015007916,0.00018188327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99778533,0.0005674949,0.00031805292,0.00036985142,0.00076380756,0.00019545828],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00815524,0.0000900275,0.00017618464,0.00001529247,0.00011544235,0.000009798742,0.00057125906,0.0014445068,0.000025572534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018709725,0.000043969943,0.00022130153,0.000052435476,0.00079149334,0.0000019167965,0.00011517828,0.0013923286,0.0000015710134],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002003194,0.00055506127,0.005319731,0.0002383661,0.00076549954,0.00008052453,0.0024476866,0.000021180851,0.770341,0.004286175,0.040547766,0.17339383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035467788,0.0024629836,0.032242224,0.0005174034,0.00011312951,0.00031034142,0.0011491656,0.000027111702,0.39897913,0.013198391,0.54706794,0.00038541004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005471128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000060185084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50652015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015778951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015449167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331323766","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2015-103232","title":"Public funding of uterine transplantation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Organ and Tissue Transplantation Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Hospital admission; Retrospective cohort study; Transplantation; Emergency medicine; Medical emergency; Family medicine; Heart transplantation; Public hospital; Nursing; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.2227342448115227,"score_gpt":0.4552116930091113,"score_spread":0.2324774481975886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2331323766","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5627726,0.0004190894,0.076504916,0.35750166,0.0005601342,0.00011849889,0.000019694637,0.000017214372,0.0020862513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98736703,0.010811778,0.00070738746,0.00046257235,0.00025692783,3.3444255e-7,0.0000014957337,0.000007155966,0.00038531044],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99632883,0.00012314833,0.0004778002,0.00005796233,0.0028714943,0.00014078073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978264,0.0009663065,0.00015861249,0.0000734918,0.00059644936,0.0003787265],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037721994,0.00005519362,0.00022269643,0.00019079418,0.000025179006,0.000006459674,0.00013808979,0.00032143272,0.0028182345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023869348,0.000030416493,0.00008095223,0.00014402573,0.00018030325,0.000103990154,0.000007283044,0.0009929733,0.000013785307],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005389429,0.0019220249,0.081494704,0.017122973,0.0012178057,0.010209926,0.013555098,0.0000015138394,0.35177732,0.10554117,0.003958606,0.40780944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.072356455,0.010182305,0.2676168,0.028262276,0.0009547857,0.0358016,0.0015504268,0.00020588412,0.30229837,0.008399854,0.2715386,0.000832677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007112387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013923705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4245945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027226004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011901499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342304210","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2016-103560","title":"Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Conscientious objector; Accommodation; Law; Scope (computer science); Torture; Democracy; Political science; Reasonable accommodation; Liberal democracy; Sociology; Medicine; Human rights; Politics; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07287488935834395,"score_gpt":0.42938051980853237,"score_spread":0.3565056304501884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2342304210","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06194411,0.00017322117,0.0039601447,0.9206067,0.0062451963,0.00022255768,0.000004420867,0.00003559442,0.0068080868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9181079,0.0013597534,0.00095078495,0.0708642,0.004572048,0.000009805654,0.00000236967,0.00002010266,0.004113024],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886418,0.0016806945,0.00083226274,0.00019365462,0.008247555,0.00040403169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99342245,0.0038833146,0.000376549,0.00012692204,0.0012363653,0.00095440296],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026803985,0.00012304554,0.00032282373,0.00022358225,0.0004582391,0.000077926474,0.0006968346,0.0019000242,0.002335495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.067144744,0.00007779579,0.0001323029,0.0002832826,0.0011689066,0.00047699627,0.000114646245,0.003683252,0.000043103217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005969531,0.0013591307,0.029952664,0.0001712677,0.00011486699,0.00059708394,0.11194201,0.000013669281,0.00028136166,0.21233472,0.5700291,0.07260717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036111905,0.0005244086,0.011107698,0.0049011493,0.000043870827,0.00013953065,0.009318497,0.00016494642,0.00015946724,0.09936599,0.870142,0.00052126846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005654115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02446747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8561638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023852891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061681615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516475011","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2016-103573","title":"‘Wicked problems’, community engagement and the need for an implementation science for research ethics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Wicked problem; Context (archaeology); Politics; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Social issues; Sociology; Ethical issues; Research ethics; Variety (cybernetics); Engineering ethics; Public relations; Management science; Computer science; Political science; Medicine; Law; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.9575289498321614,"score_gpt":0.8089739082075317,"score_spread":0.14855504162462974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2516475011","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014413443,0.000046573594,0.017559351,0.9743003,0.0017323182,0.004576813,0.0001767975,0.000015154016,0.00015131664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0039374568,0.0011559811,0.0030041533,0.9831057,0.0076991096,0.0007869668,0.000027488784,0.000042173866,0.00024096589],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9277739,0.051487666,0.0033365705,0.00041341173,0.014949301,0.0020391562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.71421486,0.26982012,0.0023287039,0.00069628813,0.012152109,0.000787923],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6016953,0.00024193949,0.000674338,0.0007015972,0.011909478,0.00011980815,0.0028463386,0.0029082526,0.0002299136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2642581,0.00013419759,0.00012999152,0.00062356144,0.008544407,0.0004985086,0.00071412337,0.062840685,0.000007530274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015400477,0.000017528,0.000024218582,0.0031188908,0.00002970232,0.0000019697309,0.19778123,1.8508898e-7,0.000040253697,0.013207187,0.78201747,0.003607371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0068995235,0.0008293169,0.00004936415,0.001395726,0.00004695459,0.000012058293,0.05424749,0.00008689708,0.0000130626795,0.036246777,0.9000368,0.00013603408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014586569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024063792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3374372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058128145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517489914","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2016-103565","title":"‘Spiritual care is not the hospital's business’: a qualitative study on the perspectives of patients about the integration of spirituality in healthcare settings","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Spirituality; Health care; Qualitative research; Spiritual care; Medicine; Nursing; Sociology; Alternative medicine; Political science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.09495958628904612,"score_gpt":0.47481512034013384,"score_spread":0.37985553405108774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517489914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5587482,0.00034667304,0.000047814017,0.44004,0.00035483376,0.0002796423,0.000017347187,0.0000023996004,0.00016307108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916214,0.000917554,0.000012005632,0.007107272,0.0003150464,0.00000813225,5.434736e-7,0.0000068079507,0.000011290915],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98762435,0.0068946704,0.0010567057,0.00019286179,0.0039921505,0.00023927925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860696,0.008754408,0.0011119478,0.00030041137,0.0036532304,0.00011039137],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023803933,0.00013927225,0.00039430388,0.0000854471,0.00037731914,0.00002767795,0.000979837,0.00048204904,0.00006585351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033944465,0.00005355238,0.0001673913,0.00050417555,0.00255337,0.00012282416,0.000066046574,0.0019110532,0.000002111156],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013417604,0.00051560596,0.012450527,0.000031853946,0.00004320294,0.0000022152342,0.9517637,1.368595e-7,0.000004357229,0.029775484,0.002282522,0.0029962473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000809261,0.0007382886,0.17329033,0.00046799652,0.000020185616,5.292787e-7,0.81672794,3.1926888e-7,0.000020997044,0.007031235,0.00082814955,0.000064787244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009644868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011226966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43293273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001476938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014453356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525580804","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2016-103903","title":"Selling conscience short: a response to Schuklenk and Smalling on conscientious objections by medical professionals","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Sincerity; Conscientious objector; Law; Norm (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.13183286642847597,"score_gpt":0.552900138670184,"score_spread":0.421067272241708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525580804","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24385247,0.00050132605,0.04741357,0.7017793,0.0048318515,0.00038185215,0.000016057998,0.000052095013,0.0011714539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8889501,0.003669277,0.0032430582,0.10092598,0.0011720973,0.000028681006,7.514092e-7,0.00003709258,0.0019729424],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97177905,0.012109392,0.0018944637,0.0004683457,0.012949496,0.00079927174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77445686,0.21743497,0.0008285924,0.00043651153,0.0031025102,0.0037405712],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.17530705,0.00022765351,0.00054482295,0.00036037437,0.0022234016,0.00003330854,0.0010268583,0.0029401076,0.0021337701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.65306133,0.00013340091,0.000105165724,0.00056367874,0.0019973544,0.00027905614,0.00039986306,0.025987187,0.00017276472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012533652,0.0038873134,0.0115752565,0.0020475618,0.0006003421,0.0034952897,0.07139118,0.000020564503,0.043192968,0.19779813,0.5666697,0.08678802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010828983,0.0037896226,0.001889165,0.076353185,0.00025975314,0.0018020485,0.027049132,0.0009847955,0.0017092339,0.03784958,0.8361343,0.0013501656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000034615176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014304108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6450977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026332383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015153222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531176831","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2016-103683","title":"Feasibility of conducting prospective observational research on critically ill, dying patients in the intensive care unit","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University Health Centre; University of Ottawa; McGill University; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Observational study; Intensive care unit; Informed consent; Organ donation; Critically ill; Medicine; Research ethics; Population; Intensive care; Protocol (science); Intensive care medicine; MEDLINE; Life support; Nursing; Alternative medicine; Transplantation; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.7650635053622039,"score_gpt":0.6127096864882046,"score_spread":0.15235381887399935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531176831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9441892,0.00031801642,0.00013017682,0.054424595,0.00017108723,0.00018563114,0.0000082221595,0.0000019610054,0.00057114364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99491936,0.0004507716,0.0004367477,0.0039803833,0.00019278683,0.000002133938,0.0000023306159,0.0000060685775,0.000009390965],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99376225,0.0008239244,0.0006772352,0.00012239272,0.0044279364,0.000186229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.942503,0.015578759,0.00029934052,0.00020026603,0.04123449,0.00018415396],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008662114,0.00008049864,0.0003557871,0.00014852904,0.000056943976,0.000005057515,0.00025681013,0.0003526684,0.000062341125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3009039,0.00003937372,0.00009036226,0.00029718372,0.0007645746,0.00008263992,0.000059315033,0.00299051,0.0000016183978],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007218623,0.00028752713,0.9496674,0.0003863166,0.000056752495,0.000117788164,0.039126404,9.590975e-7,0.00042195275,0.006283653,0.00039160854,0.0025378002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0077470955,0.0036493058,0.7312886,0.026300991,0.000073987045,0.00004800752,0.21637738,0.000018292554,0.0049986136,0.007968023,0.0013968123,0.0001328913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007268975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000055541328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29224178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019416616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017387519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99930966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2541159367","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2016-103883","title":"Against the accommodation of subjective healthcare provider beliefs in medicine: counteracting supporters of conscientious objector accommodation arguments","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Conscientious objector; Accommodation; Context (archaeology); Ideology; Reasonable accommodation; Law; Medicine; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.11843766615760935,"score_gpt":0.5187173455133013,"score_spread":0.4002796793556919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2541159367","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34308004,0.00040364233,0.005134427,0.6426135,0.005017158,0.00094236934,0.000027204373,0.000017032857,0.002764665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98646206,0.002107553,0.0003499961,0.010409992,0.00057650515,0.0000128510455,0.000006341099,0.000019210322,0.00005551459],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9813923,0.00853234,0.0029990494,0.00022807306,0.0064139282,0.00043425878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9136813,0.0768634,0.0048467596,0.00042709065,0.0038175464,0.00036384581],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.075070575,0.00017272399,0.0006679866,0.0003169797,0.00043753133,0.000006681755,0.0008542745,0.0013377062,0.0005798832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24532036,0.0000909494,0.000104649276,0.00048253892,0.0013323912,0.0005518108,0.00020763706,0.01358274,0.000008796563],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029562332,0.0020695322,0.4338852,0.010807465,0.0008633976,0.00025999904,0.3368986,0.000039287937,0.021030031,0.08304072,0.028129231,0.08002031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.044223197,0.0043503866,0.24509338,0.15495479,0.000673814,0.0003259032,0.39093894,0.0013027422,0.0037951935,0.11812676,0.034906894,0.0013079937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001030214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021889908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.643382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046846597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072001405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2552650277","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2016-103564","title":"Parents perspectives on whole genome sequencing for their children: qualified enthusiasm?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Genomics and Rare Diseases","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St Joseph's Health Centre; St. Michael's Hospital; University of Toronto; SickKids Foundation; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital; Hospital for Sick Children","funders":"Hospital for Sick Children","keywords":"Enthusiasm; Exome sequencing; Ambivalence; Obligation; Qualitative research; Medical genetics; Psychology; Medicine; Test (biology); Dyad; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Genetics","score_opus":0.03587551244528292,"score_gpt":0.3285380107046888,"score_spread":0.2926624982594059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2552650277","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9755602,0.0020420626,0.008897657,0.01282711,0.00031981096,0.00011229545,0.00012572076,0.0000038311755,0.000111345085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946592,0.0026340466,0.00018190242,0.0012400536,0.0011789408,0.0000028989332,0.000015892632,0.0000144023,0.00007270592],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860525,0.00010844505,0.0003024551,0.00016856912,0.00063464564,0.00018062082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988495,0.00018499215,0.00020961586,0.00015859299,0.000353621,0.00024363928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015378537,0.00011400067,0.00016829802,0.00004190492,0.00008423934,0.000017253013,0.00033707015,0.00043632917,0.000033307184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030419135,0.00006344153,0.00021083173,0.000026764445,0.00013482243,0.0000034738707,0.00005815237,0.00039219018,0.0000034644036],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016645981,0.00094700424,0.0014125326,0.00014894367,0.0013183556,0.00009769543,0.012722724,0.000086017164,0.9487065,0.006260954,0.007899556,0.018735105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03604644,0.018893607,0.031799316,0.0041009705,0.000680324,0.0024948297,0.06597437,0.00015142112,0.25579745,0.013667827,0.5668847,0.003508761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004104592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008763948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69290906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045501427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009954531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36416742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557938468","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2016-103658","title":"Highlights in bioethics through 40 years: a quantitative analysis of top-cited journal articles","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Publishing; Mainstream; Bibliometrics; Social science; Medicine; Political science; Library science; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.311173576527714,"score_gpt":0.5307679666370625,"score_spread":0.2195943901093485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2557938468","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6968146,0.00083974,0.04788343,0.25320864,0.0008923714,0.00004066493,0.000011544087,0.0000056716744,0.00030338007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99021417,0.0036437183,0.0034782737,0.0022602365,0.00027539994,4.087327e-7,3.3200104e-7,0.000007814781,0.00011962125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9815358,0.002068591,0.0027189937,0.0002469445,0.013100554,0.00032909628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96442467,0.028890783,0.0025324337,0.00035109653,0.003298418,0.0005025844],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07310236,0.00013900359,0.0008982423,0.0016146209,0.00009490771,0.00036880941,0.0031208857,0.0012821627,0.0008763498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22790104,0.00006909848,0.00041759777,0.004456954,0.0011287886,0.0019989437,0.00025492147,0.004950427,0.00001978347],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019652823,0.0013157061,0.11650946,0.000059609487,0.003808727,0.0023417673,0.14564925,0.00078509876,0.0018285146,0.5389638,0.06429108,0.12248173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007369556,0.0012393261,0.14766704,0.0037094883,0.0012118465,0.00058909773,0.03885449,0.0058907964,0.0025807607,0.68534625,0.10475319,0.000788155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002408401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057203666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29339963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010111179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023544827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2567676032","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2016-103460","title":"Organ donation after medical assistance in dying or cessation of life-sustaining treatment requested by conscious patients: the Canadian context","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal; Hôpital Notre-Dame; Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé","keywords":"Organ donation; Legislation; Context (archaeology); Donation; Autonomy; Government (linguistics); Supreme court; Tissue Donation; Medicine; Law; Political science; Surgery; Transplantation; History","score_opus":0.03134519623218251,"score_gpt":0.32839974285809664,"score_spread":0.29705454662591413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2567676032","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68034536,0.00042276565,0.0023952262,0.3159077,0.00041838927,0.00026090592,0.000021910224,0.000009443346,0.00021832752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99182063,0.0011966934,0.00006229352,0.0067325374,0.00010480308,0.000004220158,0.0000127776275,0.000009775772,0.00005627724],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960659,0.0003060171,0.0007494617,0.00009676695,0.0026258267,0.00015604123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967354,0.0014436253,0.0003547613,0.00008541291,0.00091498846,0.00046582476],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029726648,0.00009510995,0.0002589413,0.00018581223,0.000068593086,0.00001545717,0.000119365446,0.0005390205,0.00082421006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011598825,0.00004560691,0.00004528654,0.00020966843,0.00022816008,0.00014647687,0.000006000856,0.0008137175,0.0000024665185],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0056864507,0.0014648328,0.70181024,0.00066388707,0.0005597901,0.0014085958,0.03526239,0.000003311768,0.00051805814,0.0061128787,0.0029250542,0.24358453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.100357585,0.005567414,0.78846514,0.019470543,0.00080649764,0.0007545811,0.008814676,0.0011500459,0.0044363937,0.0011799596,0.068193205,0.00080394966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045475927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18716812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31147528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005937129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076172994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2583077528","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2016-103933","title":"Appealing to the crowd: ethical justifications in Canadian medical crowdfunding campaigns","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Michael Smith Health Research BC","keywords":"Appeal; Public relations; Medical ethics; Political science; Visibility; Ethical issues; Internet privacy; Law; Engineering ethics","score_opus":0.23266069456961855,"score_gpt":0.4499635552232082,"score_spread":0.21730286065358964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2583077528","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000017940272,0.76419204,0.0018144203,0.21591875,0.0056321053,0.00076435285,0.000024316712,0.00004869384,0.011587357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027268296,0.96617603,0.00012762652,0.021552846,0.0089382585,0.00004262293,0.00002648004,0.00011734028,0.0002919635],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98866844,0.000246826,0.002540178,0.00051182817,0.0069090477,0.0011237006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917272,0.0031420465,0.0023230128,0.0008934936,0.00110456,0.0008097011],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.038958624,0.00056628877,0.0019478699,0.0016036124,0.0009049998,0.0013611173,0.0052520055,0.0062798355,0.00076588907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17865601,0.00038360895,0.0006955797,0.0012638159,0.0006519675,0.00059060025,0.0007466999,0.027962005,0.00064022874],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012824551,0.00010727717,0.00007737709,0.014767187,0.00015603827,0.0022253462,0.0004036124,0.000015990285,5.99495e-8,0.14434043,0.06036146,0.7775324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019250474,0.00001364692,0.00002575898,0.049063988,0.00022934153,0.0003367915,0.00011521163,0.00019609967,3.8665334e-8,0.0007394648,0.9487053,0.00038185797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03723527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36313027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8883438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006866767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02048136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589568442","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2015-102896","title":"Ethical questions identified in a study of local and expatriate responders’ perspectives of vulnerability in the 2010 Haiti earthquake","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Disaster Response and Management","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation; Toronto Rehabilitation Institute; University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; McGill University","keywords":"Expatriate; Vulnerability (computing); Humanitarian aid; Psychological intervention; Public relations; Equity (law); Political science; Medicine; Sociology; Psychology; Nursing; Law; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.17835940578444268,"score_gpt":0.5312705270906467,"score_spread":0.35291112130620406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589568442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9341797,0.00020228086,0.0008047619,0.063740514,0.0003400281,0.00039973695,0.000002399779,0.000002182997,0.00032839458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99860764,0.0004388168,0.000039619874,0.00071359146,0.00007217306,0.000010915396,1.6335765e-7,0.000005249072,0.00011182368],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885389,0.0077184616,0.0012221328,0.0001558803,0.002153473,0.00021111003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992012,0.006254363,0.00077149156,0.00044411066,0.00038185474,0.00013613903],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04838863,0.00009332878,0.00043716579,0.00022700323,0.0003016375,0.000018114297,0.0006219904,0.00076684455,0.00009659239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028165018,0.000059481856,0.00006910991,0.000103981845,0.00075554894,0.00012263923,0.00026434226,0.008567603,0.000001404169],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028088696,0.0027271817,0.021045186,0.00059371616,0.000104052466,0.00043535518,0.9467713,0.000025934958,0.00005797879,0.01915034,0.0012213711,0.0050586965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032851817,0.0005348186,0.44495216,0.00096410065,0.000029324792,0.0000068430577,0.54451346,0.000070854345,0.0000027562705,0.005122039,0.00046923297,0.000049251124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025732312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0230244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42390698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050840008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011744236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99480283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593221545","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2016-103990","title":"The ethics of betel nut consumption in Taiwan","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Oral Health Pathology and Treatment","field":"Dentistry","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Betel; Nut; Popularity; Consumption (sociology); Bioethics; Traditional medicine; Environmental health; Social science; Medicine; Political science; Sociology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.18084769769240597,"score_gpt":0.5007032012576632,"score_spread":0.31985550356525727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593221545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.825418,0.0018217574,0.00022850945,0.169402,0.0026343488,0.00008170221,0.000006157571,0.0000041792637,0.00040334987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945794,0.0039812974,0.00020658477,0.0008985529,0.0002172639,0.0000012138246,5.809604e-7,0.0000051758884,0.00010995203],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962685,0.00080679735,0.00070652907,0.00007851841,0.0019537034,0.00018591521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955638,0.0027166926,0.00090490264,0.00030413424,0.0003335931,0.0001768648],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01753473,0.0000758717,0.0002521722,0.000043319425,0.00050604413,0.0000252467,0.0005744376,0.0015099302,0.00010188385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021965997,0.000045782544,0.00009145215,0.000025442469,0.0009522311,0.000084215986,0.000091498456,0.0076656356,0.000036750513],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008789001,0.0008701951,0.8403788,0.0014753655,0.00017205009,0.0062824073,0.009529698,0.000007703883,0.0000657756,0.092102736,0.0028650933,0.045371268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005389322,0.00056528574,0.9510503,0.001978018,0.00009667084,0.0012750261,0.0008210208,0.00009439362,0.00034320125,0.028518183,0.009738756,0.00012981537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010445809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002346987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1691614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056401022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001318666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2600564521","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2016-103414","title":"Undue inducement: a case study in CAPRISA 008","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"Tides Foundation; United States Agency for International Development","keywords":"Deception; Reimbursement; Clinical trial; Undue influence; Informed consent; Health care; Medicine; Unintended consequences; Internet privacy; Business; Family medicine; Psychology; Alternative medicine; Computer science; Social psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.8079533733801705,"score_gpt":0.7131824891465726,"score_spread":0.09477088423359792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2600564521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86660844,0.00018714962,0.000110660745,0.1302326,0.0007099796,0.00024191762,7.6674957e-7,0.000005330905,0.0019031466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932411,0.0022588335,0.00037604396,0.0029063546,0.0008745839,0.0000033952617,2.2270056e-7,0.000017150305,0.00032236948],"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.985796,0.0007485791,0.0013894114,0.00023225669,0.011468702,0.00036507795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9704406,0.024052532,0.000794336,0.0010463321,0.0023681852,0.0012979598],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.088146105,0.00013546598,0.00061786675,0.0002329687,0.000303755,0.000094572206,0.001010826,0.002447826,0.000483205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.45135754,0.00009686278,0.00015929788,0.00012849025,0.00086384057,0.00013837924,0.00050969486,0.037352704,0.000023029936],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000714182,0.0060138716,0.35660467,0.0009332868,0.0004015365,0.58949316,0.021379499,0.0000031756126,0.0000690214,0.0073539033,0.0013763416,0.015657328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.09457203,0.030261852,0.41516662,0.028833684,0.0011597355,0.16079415,0.1419808,0.0011393769,0.0005605038,0.11093026,0.013210571,0.0013904258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024268024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018521003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42869902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018768906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011857555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99938846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2614570756","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2016-103988","title":"Allocation of antiretroviral drugs to HIV-infected patients in Togo: perspectives of people living with HIV and healthcare providers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université TÉLUQ; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Guideline; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Antiretroviral treatment; Health care; Antiretroviral therapy; Family medicine; Developing country; Viral load; Pathology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.02597156965125983,"score_gpt":0.38458518288270843,"score_spread":0.3586136132314486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2614570756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95465255,0.00015267414,0.0006869751,0.044035856,0.000028953922,0.0001838291,0.000006316266,0.00000250313,0.00025036818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986705,0.0005306966,0.00047745198,0.00010349083,0.00005986595,0.0000019021255,0.0000021650465,0.000007465061,0.00014642089],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99716985,0.00020485569,0.00048769586,0.00010407123,0.001870764,0.00016274364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971904,0.00042650878,0.00041315492,0.0001678478,0.0014284314,0.00037365925],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023659356,0.000073704934,0.00034901017,0.0002462194,0.000079476245,0.000019099503,0.00018053326,0.0002083174,0.000055564884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025757598,0.00005203386,0.00007425905,0.00012437392,0.00027858463,0.0001855744,0.00007699953,0.0014275095,8.400489e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041625125,0.0006671291,0.94072855,0.0012098658,0.00007833944,0.000016037658,0.045809537,0.0000013327218,0.00021338368,0.0005208504,0.0012100316,0.009128687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027836866,0.009228746,0.96008456,0.008958433,0.000037203274,0.00002670135,0.018045975,0.00044691848,0.00020435447,0.00004757436,0.00006914592,0.00006673195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011791141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001331824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04401802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007866258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001323138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9824489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2741150117","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2016-103531","title":"Ethics consultation in paediatric and adult emergency departments: an assessment of clinical, ethical, learning and resource needs","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton; Hamilton Health Sciences; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Medicine; Nursing; Needs assessment; Clinical Ethics; Resource (disambiguation); Research ethics; Medical education; Psychology; Psychiatry; Sociology; Engineering ethics","score_opus":0.21789874622187824,"score_gpt":0.6455575433712208,"score_spread":0.42765879714934263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2741150117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6719568,0.0009727125,0.0032896393,0.31687096,0.0021812895,0.00039512888,0.0000053372787,0.000020662237,0.004307503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91334367,0.06901825,0.005844052,0.0105880145,0.0010786809,0.000008041363,0.0000049007326,0.000027586246,0.00008680983],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9599963,0.028715132,0.0041244905,0.00033551783,0.0063441657,0.00048440558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.848994,0.13794103,0.006607128,0.00055415794,0.0044222665,0.0014813747],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20947069,0.00019869146,0.00086148793,0.00027535242,0.001940906,0.00003919276,0.0007001665,0.0076167798,0.00028419893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7564628,0.00015985293,0.00009435287,0.0002280133,0.0018641626,0.0004131925,0.0004965947,0.11757209,0.0000032179153],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044820792,0.0006401002,0.86032325,0.00274411,0.00016132109,0.0001810772,0.04323698,0.000015747535,0.000031360636,0.0744902,0.0026453421,0.015082291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.024467342,0.0047303224,0.579397,0.007613897,0.0008400512,0.00016334679,0.1365743,0.013275354,0.0000072495563,0.08015946,0.15179774,0.00097388244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036924618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012377311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5469921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000069574366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006344551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742315259","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2016-103726","title":"Voluntary sterilisation and access to IVF in Québec","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Langara College","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Health care; Value (mathematics); Law; Business; Political science; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.18590514038772013,"score_gpt":0.5011085386438672,"score_spread":0.31520339825614707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2742315259","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60969704,0.00039566393,0.00015381876,0.38926032,0.00022333395,0.00006629119,2.0995003e-7,0.0000048214515,0.00019853219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99189657,0.0016427289,0.00054537266,0.0055099768,0.00036465074,0.000001510765,1.8034777e-7,0.0000040351115,0.00003498058],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983869,0.000046827234,0.00032244244,0.00009871984,0.0010310502,0.000114018716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987943,0.00024857593,0.00020805592,0.00023026824,0.0002571902,0.0002615681],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038268953,0.000052016258,0.00022401554,0.00013107235,0.00009065172,0.000035240846,0.00027403983,0.00038593938,0.000042036696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040657535,0.000035887042,0.000023612354,0.00004282244,0.00023259128,0.0001853281,0.00014522328,0.0021001322,0.000002117802],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074534665,0.00014340486,0.724013,0.0005535658,0.00003061863,0.0006387335,0.0024311072,0.0000012624525,0.00020520989,0.0006743871,0.005154952,0.26540846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010367158,0.0004333728,0.9702793,0.0007516827,0.000014708133,0.00035416137,0.0002972233,0.000032915996,0.00027114854,0.0015279925,0.024957085,0.000043740863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037572382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062508276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38375035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000070137394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019410865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96742344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2749043457","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2017-104253","title":"Disabling disability amid competing ideologies","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Transhumanism; Individualism; Epistemology; Sociology; Ethos; Flourishing; Ideology; Argument (complex analysis); Methodological individualism; Environmental ethics; Psychology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Politics; Social psychology; Biology","score_opus":0.2853210443716987,"score_gpt":0.4784336158371248,"score_spread":0.1931125714654261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2749043457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5950943,0.000054988173,0.009047487,0.38742983,0.004566791,0.00014342858,0.0000083699,0.00007246984,0.0035823036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890661,0.00064639945,0.0008379213,0.008430206,0.0009369916,0.000001917321,3.9994595e-7,0.000013741311,0.000066282875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99244416,0.0006215102,0.0011309411,0.0003019677,0.0051166043,0.00038484033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98689467,0.009929769,0.0015239193,0.0007165531,0.00052916596,0.00040592608],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012213075,0.00016566209,0.00038551714,0.00007423445,0.0012351568,0.00027290374,0.0023884682,0.0006791659,0.000505476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37998003,0.000125848,0.00015113362,0.00015798725,0.0066199726,0.00046533466,0.00068090076,0.0077651814,0.000029484278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036751473,0.0031405748,0.029327314,0.0014932671,0.00013052774,0.0022426238,0.009016357,0.000079407626,0.19100939,0.685463,0.0075143497,0.07021568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009371598,0.0021743276,0.056872256,0.006432643,0.0002351177,0.001698896,0.0042971545,0.0056591094,0.29924855,0.4944666,0.11746454,0.0020792056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030858842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006198203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3939718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000911377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007586068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99608344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789758196","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2017-104203","title":"Making medical decisions for an incompetent older adult when both a proxy and an advance directive are available: which is more likely to reflect the older adult’s preferences?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Health and Social Services Centre University Institute of Geriatrics of Sherbrooke; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Institute of Aging; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Directive; Proxy (statistics); Psychology; Computer science; Data science","score_opus":0.2389996302776031,"score_gpt":0.5113238609289056,"score_spread":0.2723242306513025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789758196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6620913,0.00501775,0.04828977,0.2785683,0.0017812137,0.0018984807,0.000099826015,0.000075979646,0.0021773358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8903162,0.008221774,0.04244492,0.055061564,0.0035713648,0.000065849534,0.000011347651,0.00006706083,0.00023994586],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99357563,0.00041962325,0.000921675,0.00040113053,0.0042805183,0.0004014306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881659,0.0036685844,0.0006198585,0.00040801187,0.006023742,0.0011139065],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045522084,0.0002636583,0.00074838876,0.0001650982,0.0002536984,0.000045203575,0.0006211011,0.00085632526,0.00047860516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07045034,0.00015062226,0.00012299223,0.00035719218,0.0005958684,0.00025221566,0.00015921931,0.0027059235,0.000005259908],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00820029,0.0032762985,0.08437822,0.001883569,0.0016564534,0.0004908258,0.45148888,0.000007183101,0.00043020496,0.0032847214,0.20647585,0.2384275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.033379216,0.03953652,0.12857233,0.28670037,0.0026296484,0.002558721,0.10650123,0.034643658,0.005460761,0.018900258,0.33862978,0.002487503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008586562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001905481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34498763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009712719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024975596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793444251","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2017-104555","title":"Cerebral organoids: ethical issues and consciousness assessment","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":206,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; James S. McDonnell Foundation","keywords":"Organoid; Neuroscience; Consciousness; Human brain; Computer science; Biology; Cognitive science; Computational biology; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.10077081983951737,"score_gpt":0.4506170804688237,"score_spread":0.34984626062930635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793444251","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24552087,0.00012836218,0.018707145,0.72873884,0.004219738,0.0001975047,0.000010796471,0.00008037616,0.0023963333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9183881,0.0010961626,0.002336942,0.07596135,0.0019329786,0.000002451806,6.251675e-7,0.000023904458,0.00025747193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909368,0.0010328466,0.0010529015,0.0003522551,0.006230123,0.0003950707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99212515,0.0051233964,0.0005712077,0.00028344608,0.0012440486,0.0006527576],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0099676065,0.00019682154,0.00041194778,0.00022708299,0.00045412386,0.00014171982,0.0008478058,0.0016711585,0.0018990603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06345454,0.00015138122,0.00007466609,0.00053886755,0.005428613,0.00019689387,0.0003511761,0.012516266,0.000045192457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012498607,0.000800091,0.0009757871,0.00035804164,0.00007333395,0.00093709416,0.0065335124,6.188691e-7,0.13903326,0.79217833,0.049926087,0.009058885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007788875,0.0053041535,0.0044754855,0.0024302965,0.000193703,0.0036974961,0.0017098951,0.0018482505,0.2957631,0.24892145,0.42656824,0.001299052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018860914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044740238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67286724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007121142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023419538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794010106","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2016-104066","title":"Disability discrimination and misdirected criticism of the quality-adjusted life year framework","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; Simon Fraser University; Vancouver Coastal Health","funders":"University of Birmingham","keywords":"Criticism; Value (mathematics); Value of life; Preference; Quality of life (healthcare); Quality-adjusted life year; Health economics; Positive economics; Psychology; Revealed preference; Quality (philosophy); Sociology; Social psychology; Actuarial science; Health care; Economics; Law; Epistemology; Cost–benefit analysis; Political science; Microeconomics; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.4921750030962723,"score_gpt":0.5116655197931035,"score_spread":0.01949051669683116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794010106","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019063681,0.0019594477,0.0025019902,0.9723962,0.0031898872,0.0002959463,0.00024451048,0.000011478401,0.00033688202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04423895,0.0014020742,0.0029864842,0.940741,0.010282058,0.000010180199,0.000023443836,0.00005519111,0.00026063205],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98644537,0.0033483075,0.007674055,0.00039906777,0.0017789254,0.00035426862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9663507,0.022448823,0.008946,0.00083232817,0.001014136,0.00040806792],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08489744,0.00026271338,0.0018408174,0.0001841802,0.00018983128,0.00007121418,0.0009730521,0.0042742533,0.0009544159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.30932572,0.00022391463,0.00036916538,0.0002266319,0.0014557521,0.00020666815,0.00017288543,0.009423827,0.00005025636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003251485,0.00020248859,0.011397285,0.0069777104,0.00027332245,0.000006681684,0.0071259984,0.0000015959581,4.8719056e-7,0.054334223,0.91949683,0.00015086851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014859005,0.00025977162,0.06633054,0.006542289,0.00013888937,0.000054864722,0.0020810755,0.000383361,0.0000058291084,0.19250342,0.7295747,0.0006393991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005480408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001688399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22442828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038032804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017261718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802761848","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2017-104282","title":"Thinking clearly about the FIRST trial: addressing ethical challenges in cluster randomised trials of policy interventions involving health providers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Hospital Admissions and Outcomes","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Research ethics; Psychological intervention; Harm; Health care; Beneficence; Informed consent; Cluster randomised controlled trial; Medicine; Clinical equipoise; Clinical trial; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Nursing; Psychology; Alternative medicine; Political science; Law; Psychiatry; Autonomy","score_opus":0.33791501756793874,"score_gpt":0.510305597031566,"score_spread":0.17239057946362724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802761848","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039562937,0.010741118,0.000752922,0.9467439,0.00094484724,0.00085064507,0.000001598086,0.000014117732,0.0003878895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94768685,0.018301513,0.001159282,0.029783392,0.0029791142,0.000010044707,0.0000011150062,0.000029345723,0.00004935589],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99032444,0.0026423286,0.0032305403,0.00016830591,0.003296032,0.00033835924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9743989,0.020247977,0.002990904,0.00042941337,0.0010891341,0.00084367994],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08919272,0.00016506745,0.0014320544,0.0003953907,0.00026660395,0.00005849641,0.00048271337,0.0011785855,0.00021177567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23223355,0.00008577792,0.00083283504,0.00030477528,0.0006519136,0.00011789983,0.00015951028,0.0069310283,0.0000021099547],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.19430698,0.004121725,0.0020204035,0.0147516765,0.0019177039,0.00041834192,0.38435355,0.000023572848,0.00008015958,0.06933233,0.026283048,0.3023905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.6986172,0.016239248,0.017041937,0.1499859,0.00077481486,0.0007218579,0.037455514,0.0011454981,0.00018049183,0.023978526,0.05327383,0.0005851676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023447847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009604054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91696054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016860956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059688133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804243785","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2017-104479","title":"Duty to provide care to Ebola patients: the perspectives of Guinean lay people and healthcare providers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université TÉLUQ; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Division of Materials Research; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Duty; Obligation; Health care; Family medicine; Nursing; Health professionals; Duty of care; Medicine; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03881658770516298,"score_gpt":0.4187481287003875,"score_spread":0.3799315409952245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804243785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71819234,0.0005655829,0.00045834502,0.27973175,0.00021652078,0.00043314538,0.0000068874565,0.000006514991,0.00038891024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928631,0.0002858625,0.00047122693,0.005638718,0.00064845994,0.000005106004,9.105266e-7,0.000011245018,0.00007537732],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668306,0.00024188799,0.00042602202,0.0001376379,0.0022942317,0.00021718378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99485976,0.00043616997,0.00013495923,0.00016932031,0.0037240959,0.00067570154],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024716367,0.00009457881,0.0002986611,0.00016709168,0.00018012147,0.00002552712,0.00018058754,0.00028105013,0.000082469815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014264651,0.00005217839,0.00008637083,0.00034008618,0.00031378985,0.00006664851,0.00013351577,0.0018793808,0.0000060337106],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027036408,0.0010594127,0.087271966,0.0028416528,0.00039272796,0.00009829322,0.7073097,0.000010157608,0.001179876,0.0034479024,0.0432125,0.15047213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008603007,0.04466092,0.26089194,0.005853967,0.00030983667,0.0006930186,0.43339682,0.00020958195,0.00489404,0.0005550615,0.23942845,0.0005033777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010825547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028943003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27467075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012397554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001817106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99403864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804658933","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2018-104860","title":"‘No’ to lesbian motherhood using human nuclear genome transfer","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Race, Genetics, and Society","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Mistake; Lesbian; Argument (complex analysis); Appeal; Human rights; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Biology; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.043724502844390056,"score_gpt":0.3368103271612359,"score_spread":0.2930858243168458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804658933","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13530543,0.001812554,0.008907864,0.8475914,0.0033898698,0.00032973543,0.00007073141,0.000016491475,0.0025759346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00871646,0.0027042308,0.0026992608,0.93521494,0.048545413,0.0000011265241,0.000052314943,0.00015910188,0.001907152],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99571735,0.0003465293,0.0007445486,0.00034986608,0.002409386,0.0004323393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800426,0.000055122782,0.00021835865,0.00043327676,0.00087824045,0.00041074518],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029455803,0.00030436303,0.0005015457,0.00007711762,0.00022939386,0.00006594561,0.0010345585,0.0061396817,0.00050575397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009855585,0.0002658389,0.0005027828,0.00006593785,0.0004613479,0.0000032425319,0.00013842521,0.0067242784,0.00003687018],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048567865,0.00008397363,0.000010507612,0.00030107348,0.00049053296,0.00028542837,0.002710832,0.000016958476,0.08003658,0.000023049772,0.9157429,0.00024962315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005416572,0.00084744475,0.000015852362,0.00025084443,0.000103630045,0.00020288565,0.00014921876,0.000015565944,0.00059929537,0.00008323405,0.99688,0.00031038187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025811689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029550316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12658897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059069353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012835511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810354483","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2018-104804","title":"Device representatives in hospitals: are commercial imperatives driving clinical decision-making?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Receipt; Outsourcing; Public relations; Accountability; Health care; Payment; Health professionals; Product (mathematics); Business; Medicine; Political science; Marketing; Finance; Law; Accounting","score_opus":0.5499451376696158,"score_gpt":0.6951795252218297,"score_spread":0.14523438755221385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810354483","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9154691,0.0013228066,0.00076604186,0.07602563,0.0048942347,0.00018793787,0.0000104768915,0.00002286163,0.0013008908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9624277,0.0035604995,0.0008602316,0.028749486,0.004345278,0.0000039607644,8.555819e-7,0.000017397442,0.000034612916],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901423,0.005103417,0.001991297,0.00031586055,0.0018677294,0.00057939877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9697291,0.026425868,0.0009601715,0.00021665014,0.001348847,0.0013193465],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.027413309,0.00023753509,0.00073870673,0.00019193541,0.00040624832,0.000040489744,0.00092248805,0.0035924949,0.0039565624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060188316,0.00019002391,0.00023688674,0.00042672877,0.0018965006,0.00029546782,0.00028229185,0.022668641,0.000084299616],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020129834,0.0013014721,0.74488884,0.00015704722,0.00031183034,0.0020913722,0.011579237,0.00002688449,0.00009591964,0.003453623,0.028967777,0.205113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010385489,0.0021792976,0.68816507,0.0053379154,0.0003172828,0.0008214092,0.011596707,0.005328343,0.0014577359,0.018334862,0.2551855,0.00089039264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014852806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004905834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22621773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010940585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019844165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99770105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2865769117","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2016-103917","title":"Fair, just and compassionate: A pilot for making allocation decisions for patients requesting experimental drugs outside of clinical trials","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Sinai Health System; Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Compassionate Use; Status quo; Clinical trial; Medicine; Health care; Medical ethics; Public relations; Business; Political science; Law; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.5250177724856322,"score_gpt":0.6054967919252732,"score_spread":0.08047901943964098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2865769117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57301867,0.0012250916,0.24663925,0.1712939,0.0057063443,0.0018605837,0.000037905178,0.000027566119,0.0001906819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.966313,0.00030233027,0.029566465,0.0019227349,0.001840662,0.000008641768,0.000015638638,0.00001552119,0.00001501274],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939569,0.0005554122,0.0026149154,0.00018393113,0.0025133423,0.00017546606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97553504,0.019170092,0.0017626508,0.00014198087,0.0028754189,0.00051482924],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04157437,0.00011869238,0.00087592716,0.00013840731,0.00017426877,0.000016527993,0.0001539,0.0010417306,0.000043974287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13468756,0.00007555843,0.00027146196,0.00010940798,0.0012396108,0.00007732603,0.00006883961,0.0015041835,4.7178628e-7],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.020975178,0.00711166,0.004897128,0.0020964816,0.0008770117,0.00001642247,0.013852915,0.000003992258,0.0072010593,0.06871636,0.02290414,0.8513476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.22351709,0.12627546,0.09674461,0.078155205,0.0047638337,0.00065231556,0.022259127,0.15339477,0.016844707,0.13161922,0.14392933,0.0018443387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009307698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008766323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84950334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045403358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016362456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98690087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889913975","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2018-104896","title":"Medical Assistance in Dying at a paediatric hospital","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Hospital for Sick Children; De Veber; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Confusion; Stigma (botany); Institution; Population; Public relations; Sociology; Best interests; Medical humanities; Medicine; Nursing; Psychology; Medical education; Political science; Law; Social science; Psychiatry; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.1323203659210286,"score_gpt":0.4704447681932691,"score_spread":0.3381244022722405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889913975","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90091294,0.009726022,0.0015360286,0.08402826,0.0015485628,0.00008175084,0.0000019864883,0.000012010211,0.0021524131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777919,0.01317556,0.0020469828,0.0041125985,0.0027480135,0.0000012210468,0.000001699219,0.000015031147,0.000106965585],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927686,0.00021240048,0.0009149297,0.0001395749,0.0056967344,0.00026780018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99568474,0.0021514534,0.00042607595,0.00015357012,0.0008960756,0.00068809744],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006956415,0.0001260102,0.0005734516,0.0002061022,0.000047177156,0.000007371063,0.00032173534,0.0010694438,0.0010350352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045813724,0.0000897475,0.00016529739,0.00039489163,0.0006135048,0.00007402457,0.000112457295,0.0034370578,0.00002371082],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016215312,0.0016838195,0.84947234,0.0015861054,0.00046319727,0.010734004,0.03911495,0.0000018457404,0.00037816796,0.0028613878,0.048360195,0.043722443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03253822,0.0109214205,0.1419597,0.053802975,0.00073256664,0.002898577,0.008342371,0.003347697,0.0049906764,0.0037725794,0.7355607,0.0011324881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046724126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020294389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7075127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018830583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002654434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897182671","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2017-104515","title":"Reproductive outsourcing: an empirical ethics account of cross-border reproductive care in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; McGill Genome Centre; Université Laval; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Autonomy; Solidarity; Qualitative research; Research ethics; Public relations; Participant observation; Beneficence; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.1041263761469917,"score_gpt":0.5190745186924944,"score_spread":0.4149481425455027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897182671","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.850795,0.00236103,0.0002282058,0.14403494,0.0015411291,0.0002990794,0.0000074026298,0.000025268095,0.000707999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906031,0.0008990461,0.0018365461,0.0039861174,0.002584606,0.000004404628,0.0000035655175,0.000028728777,0.000053899308],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919872,0.0005719853,0.0015548564,0.00073175726,0.0046501094,0.00050409173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98661035,0.001177035,0.0009603341,0.0011727662,0.00953809,0.00054140267],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01431489,0.00024740663,0.0009681102,0.0003291267,0.00016149867,0.000017479484,0.0004897001,0.0015659118,0.00017717798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15432552,0.0001837772,0.00012234635,0.00075894105,0.001907874,0.0002475508,0.00017868775,0.012325316,0.0000023806144],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0076466515,0.0015554221,0.7810144,0.0035400868,0.0004907921,0.001926676,0.13513482,0.00015433808,0.0010279494,0.002533273,0.005165146,0.059810456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008356009,0.011202057,0.67093074,0.004140624,0.00031874678,0.0046167616,0.10306214,0.00018394984,0.038716614,0.0068437755,0.15072703,0.00090156845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17659213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33186325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15527111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010846934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04633833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899254238","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2017-104339","title":"Of dilemmas and tensions: a qualitative study of palliative care physicians’ positions regarding voluntary active euthanasia in Quebec, Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Palliative care; Autonomy; Legislation; Narrative; End-of-life care; Qualitative research; Assisted suicide; Context (archaeology); Nursing; Medicine; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Law; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.2028862193014055,"score_gpt":0.49641525582321006,"score_spread":0.29352903652180456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899254238","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.989468,0.0016085102,0.00015807661,0.00820971,0.00016929039,0.00018471375,0.00004002413,0.0000019798097,0.00015969687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979813,0.0007511293,0.0004939049,0.000560231,0.00018058761,0.0000021775504,0.000005956783,0.000009298668,0.000015383963],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99623567,0.00058364746,0.0008123224,0.00013446475,0.002082888,0.00015103826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935101,0.0027158484,0.00072133477,0.0001290071,0.0027399352,0.00018374268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012080544,0.0001318776,0.0007948013,0.00018815721,0.000050098777,0.000002561723,0.0001349039,0.00025780508,0.000024994742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068768547,0.00010042116,0.00008693962,0.0003287247,0.0005304134,0.00008746401,0.000059640955,0.0015143155,1.0528174e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00080086204,0.0005827089,0.028439604,0.00053108484,0.00070782774,0.00029078597,0.9643437,0.0000036624335,0.0005401064,0.00048768066,0.0010426807,0.0022292782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033394557,0.0020641098,0.0643374,0.01023876,0.00032807759,0.000007460185,0.9161077,0.00003906785,0.0026614028,0.00027556156,0.00049686385,0.00010414709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48549968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8802897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002374565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003141473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8232734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900688051","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2018-104982","title":"Situating requests for medical aid in dying within the broader context of end-of-life care: ethical considerations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Centre Integre de Sante et de Services Sociaux de Laval; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"McGill University Health Centre","keywords":"End-of-life care; Context (archaeology); Palliative care; Psychological intervention; Intervention (counseling); Medicine; Interpretation (philosophy); Psychology; Nursing; Gerontology; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.23047228277503978,"score_gpt":0.4984843056130418,"score_spread":0.268012022838002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900688051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5584632,0.0120146,0.025881495,0.39959684,0.0020072763,0.00068723795,0.000030900934,0.000020581021,0.0012978314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97693163,0.0009819253,0.007881346,0.013257091,0.0009153231,0.0000044858843,0.0000042355705,0.000016115715,0.000007823765],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929105,0.0006555937,0.0019627253,0.00015328827,0.004086575,0.00023129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.975903,0.018555578,0.001211189,0.0002556755,0.0035491006,0.00052549114],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01289015,0.00015392818,0.0008832483,0.00015994452,0.00010142392,0.000009051055,0.00029442098,0.0015983174,0.00029957012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20558798,0.00009709575,0.00022082929,0.00022157177,0.0019862622,0.00006775709,0.00007690234,0.0053534247,0.0000013294641],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003947892,0.001306995,0.05580194,0.0075626476,0.00188784,0.0007936366,0.65696156,0.000085482694,0.008185152,0.20990017,0.019240025,0.03432668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.08668942,0.020390844,0.009666317,0.18172188,0.002700665,0.0031661629,0.36283442,0.021867014,0.1555084,0.059650492,0.09389065,0.0019137403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028947578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014101842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41846842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007382753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009155008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900751875","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2018-105003","title":"Drawing the line on physician-assisted death","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Paternalism; Terminally ill; Argument (complex analysis); Meaning (existential); Medicine; Law; Scope (computer science); Medical practice; Sociology; Psychology; Nursing; Family medicine; Palliative care; Political science; Psychotherapist; Computer science","score_opus":0.27417700781973037,"score_gpt":0.5861741512083343,"score_spread":0.3119971433886039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900751875","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02354665,0.00032590318,0.012305685,0.86959654,0.00939679,0.00023968353,0.000002403105,0.000046632173,0.08453974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72299516,0.0009613838,0.00115227,0.25955728,0.014692497,0.00000422006,8.411591e-7,0.000028488077,0.0006078914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98231214,0.0080488995,0.0012419606,0.00016519292,0.0077536576,0.00047816717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90142435,0.09331714,0.001352263,0.00049297843,0.0027450991,0.0006681517],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08183526,0.00015622526,0.00038508652,0.000086792585,0.0021756177,0.000020704692,0.0011463582,0.0022480013,0.0013550747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2966007,0.00008386553,0.00014970459,0.00030330004,0.0011513997,0.00014171533,0.00022873963,0.059902485,0.0005183132],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010919973,0.0011166865,0.0010722303,0.00082002854,0.00048684757,0.0007332097,0.05669793,0.000007965059,0.000489548,0.6584281,0.21590106,0.06315441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031950446,0.0018096152,0.004259337,0.008533381,0.0002377821,0.00013592538,0.012587849,0.00089586683,0.00018496977,0.11475356,0.85311997,0.00028672622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000771152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015574085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69944847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016410006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005485383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904694623","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2018-105272","title":"Grounded ethical analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Data science; Grounded theory; Engineering ethics; Computer science; World Wide Web; Sociology; Engineering; Qualitative research; Social science","score_opus":0.056887747925552706,"score_gpt":0.48579809933903123,"score_spread":0.42891035141347855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904694623","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001011057,0.0044508157,0.0019611483,0.1662717,0.8245404,0.00014145878,0.000042706335,0.000034059132,0.002456645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024877894,0.03372066,0.0017026796,0.010620998,0.9503315,0.000002436612,0.00013615936,0.00006484295,0.0009329433],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9649697,0.0015010254,0.0026487454,0.00048984896,0.029780542,0.0006101351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9471575,0.029797466,0.0023107377,0.0009989118,0.016779298,0.0029560826],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05406137,0.00047020693,0.002610326,0.0010424695,0.0002178765,0.00010517695,0.0011874757,0.04584837,0.0018732786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27919933,0.00034173465,0.0015363249,0.0014678142,0.0011495119,0.00006997713,0.00026023109,0.12390892,0.000063003245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030797982,0.000222452,0.000044207598,0.0018037761,0.0024257982,0.0021577314,0.0020371117,5.113235e-7,3.0800797e-7,0.0012636659,0.9888297,0.0009068092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018543483,0.0014680099,0.000037904843,0.0018733265,0.006684673,0.00017076045,0.0001731412,0.00008752284,0.0000020271943,0.001974621,0.9853925,0.00028114094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00071341527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006639376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22513795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045727074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040901534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915434968","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2018-104867","title":"Informed consent for functional MRI research on comatose patients following severe brain injury: balancing the social benefits of research against patient autonomy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Traumatic Brain Injury Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Informed consent; Autonomy; Proxy (statistics); Clinical research; Intensive care unit; Psychology; Deception; Research ethics; Medicine; Affect (linguistics); Intensive care medicine; Psychiatry; Social psychology; Computer science; Alternative medicine; Law; Political science; Pathology","score_opus":0.28396276428616773,"score_gpt":0.5025206722295507,"score_spread":0.21855790794338292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2915434968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9006753,0.000084574254,0.00007408192,0.09481194,0.00089855725,0.0013501932,0.00003503206,0.000011895558,0.0020584383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949241,0.00011329259,0.00038478474,0.0036284435,0.0006191268,0.000038709302,0.000026856822,0.000036506597,0.00022815017],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9794507,0.0016150491,0.0014312156,0.00026102428,0.016418932,0.0008231028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9353005,0.05781328,0.0004907286,0.00041986842,0.0053882175,0.0005873727],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.040064916,0.00019059917,0.00066483393,0.0007099307,0.00062494795,0.00006307831,0.00065587665,0.0009432682,0.0002174184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07804461,0.00012306168,0.00040503812,0.00078575226,0.000830812,0.0001419467,0.0003262488,0.008949809,0.000036910213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02471088,0.005717304,0.0875471,0.011031232,0.0029113821,0.00016441611,0.075478554,0.00045520623,0.0007643834,0.05756681,0.6334356,0.10021714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.092368014,0.062762,0.39043653,0.06636467,0.00042106403,0.0005180491,0.111842744,0.006645133,0.0043452405,0.009874162,0.25265187,0.0017705448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032474123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000533806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38078374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008292563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02263985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99333656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915898433","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2018-105099","title":"‘I just need an opiate refill to get me through the weekend’","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Opioid Use Disorder Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficence; Autonomy; Medical prescription; Duty; Fiduciary; Medicine; Medical ethics; Opioid; Opioid epidemic; Psychiatry; Political science; Nursing; Law","score_opus":0.06409793850064714,"score_gpt":0.40135966631972064,"score_spread":0.3372617278190735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2915898433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55001926,0.0009408773,0.00040187626,0.4432377,0.0014858586,0.00032436612,0.0000048975344,0.000023135795,0.003562019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9276688,0.0028407446,0.0033693865,0.06292756,0.0014725303,0.0000064303554,0.00001100867,0.00005115491,0.0016523487],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946103,0.00028533995,0.00064781064,0.00017865397,0.0039668935,0.00031101267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974022,0.00070409774,0.00025244654,0.000480233,0.00054696406,0.00061406114],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003480327,0.00017605883,0.00048963126,0.00007999129,0.00008773611,0.000032041757,0.0004865528,0.0006499837,0.001053043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003277233,0.00009431205,0.00018901262,0.00022641286,0.00012347374,0.00014132257,0.00010175778,0.0036728363,0.00025776084],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007892234,0.01343192,0.045553718,0.0039355955,0.0054149753,0.006740397,0.50681615,0.001058339,0.005813294,0.10618921,0.23062414,0.066530034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01597514,0.010814362,0.032682,0.0037080054,0.001180404,0.0027217928,0.043118663,0.00075898785,0.0010693802,0.0054201796,0.88194317,0.0006079018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019056397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006132074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.651319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012325244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019384247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918511500","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2018-105304","title":"Should the deceased be listed as authors?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"American Ornithological Society","keywords":"Relation (database); Point (geometry); Outcome (game theory); Inclusion (mineral); Process (computing); Computer science; Psychology; Data science; Social psychology; Data mining","score_opus":0.10028237868989147,"score_gpt":0.4259341482556972,"score_spread":0.3256517695658057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918511500","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3641748,0.00024968942,0.00109704,0.6280556,0.0011951529,0.00013979265,0.0000019372405,0.000017570335,0.0050684395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9609908,0.00068245723,0.00018136318,0.03663861,0.00042988235,3.5922875e-7,0.000005137546,0.000008999023,0.0010624117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99587107,0.00017200604,0.00037521942,0.0000638806,0.0034160982,0.00010173296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786586,0.0010881186,0.00017150755,0.00011438224,0.0004681123,0.00029204763],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004324247,0.00006641844,0.0001811891,0.0000727331,0.000050562765,0.000018579893,0.00016801842,0.0005682753,0.0034525665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045913463,0.000036356414,0.00010753342,0.00014777879,0.00009862906,0.000056622757,0.000010403068,0.0033263708,0.0000843845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01032555,0.00445643,0.092363685,0.0055490443,0.0034874592,0.00853334,0.098863415,0.00011925602,0.024829026,0.4221596,0.19239756,0.13691562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.023568293,0.002959,0.13482875,0.0038025128,0.0013325107,0.009209655,0.0039757495,0.0029167223,0.009111071,0.0053324937,0.8025129,0.0004503485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018355255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020864103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61011535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030683663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015932675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921665581","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2018-105305","title":"We don’t need unilateral DNRs: taking informed non-dissent one step further","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; St. Boniface Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Psychological intervention; Conceptualization; Process (computing); Psychology; Intervention (counseling); Constitutionality; Psychotherapist; Medicine; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Computer science; Psychiatry; Politics","score_opus":0.1620845003178489,"score_gpt":0.4594344654512475,"score_spread":0.2973499651333986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921665581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8992839,0.002231123,0.0015252737,0.090083495,0.0013261121,0.00020125757,0.0000032139117,0.000016358945,0.0053292504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780928,0.010220889,0.0046524196,0.005077953,0.001129266,0.0000011641292,0.000006698125,0.000026293364,0.0007925418],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952453,0.00010839544,0.0008858923,0.000109407956,0.0033740553,0.00027697638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966586,0.0012603613,0.0007030371,0.00020317326,0.000702484,0.0004723395],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025760655,0.00016109909,0.00068300264,0.00018241252,0.000028875113,0.000015719914,0.0002734773,0.00078155886,0.0015064123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049734577,0.000111583955,0.00023018525,0.00019874219,0.00019535473,0.0001366488,0.00007085382,0.0028227172,0.000037054015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007249077,0.003146516,0.42936546,0.01437447,0.005494143,0.003503598,0.3297765,0.000110205474,0.026117664,0.008371098,0.041900113,0.13059117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.029879814,0.005986681,0.040903196,0.092910886,0.0010846729,0.0010323073,0.061296437,0.0034264852,0.011966054,0.0013004518,0.7492269,0.0009860777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007943283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000058136517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7073268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011496531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019410739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922171892","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2018-105160","title":"Canadian neurosurgeons’ views on medical assistance in dying (MAID): a cross-sectional survey of Canadian Neurosurgical Society (CNSS) members","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Island Health; McMaster University; Dalhousie University; Moncton Hospital; University of Saskatchewan; University of Ottawa; Saint John Regional Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Cross-sectional study; Medicine; Family medicine; Pathology","score_opus":0.09184022258758305,"score_gpt":0.3748883814095059,"score_spread":0.28304815882192286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922171892","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96295035,0.00009462687,0.00004320348,0.032934736,0.0015616873,0.00015854622,0.000043619624,0.000007110868,0.002206111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98712534,0.0010313652,0.00006189075,0.011419214,0.0001440693,0.0000010995958,0.000031011943,0.000019987458,0.00016599882],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99273616,0.00054868363,0.001178734,0.00023472596,0.00490897,0.00039271082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994768,0.0020746542,0.00032095698,0.00016389145,0.00074511755,0.0019273747],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013076916,0.00016179061,0.0005155283,0.0007356343,0.00009412307,0.000038547958,0.00030199572,0.0012116173,0.0033306133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007984669,0.00013567905,0.00021578393,0.0009557201,0.00023841157,0.00008985936,0.000012549039,0.004920624,0.000022224905],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002470075,0.00010409862,0.995754,0.0001816508,0.000047174482,0.00081141456,0.00053411536,0.00009057406,0.00004207697,0.00080040185,0.0010822912,0.00030520716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028095772,0.00021290824,0.98392695,0.000530135,0.000015027982,0.00067210034,0.000042876658,0.0016716403,0.000031871452,0.000027676766,0.009948932,0.00011031447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35001785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9183075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56828964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004565447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018200941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99758047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2936154457","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2018-105293","title":"Gatekeeping hormone replacement therapy for transgender patients is dehumanising","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":177,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Gatekeeping; Transgender; Referral; Informed consent; Foregrounding; Prejudice (legal term); Psychology; Mental health; Health care; Medicine; Psychotherapist; Nursing; Alternative medicine; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.12443491128108566,"score_gpt":0.4657815645875217,"score_spread":0.341346653306436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2936154457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9463655,0.0020162547,0.004039225,0.04117453,0.0039551654,0.00040101964,0.000010959519,0.000013417606,0.0020239705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9452315,0.0092987735,0.0005778895,0.040920384,0.0017677689,0.000006789462,0.0000066482175,0.000046112924,0.002144113],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964865,0.00030088137,0.0007698322,0.00016874819,0.0019206797,0.00035337446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974415,0.0010487909,0.0004174628,0.00021272425,0.0005561656,0.00032339786],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048948694,0.00012345804,0.00030547407,0.00012650793,0.0001535058,0.000050462513,0.00032634544,0.0007940191,0.0014263055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008039791,0.000099414625,0.00020137677,0.000083660925,0.00007999002,0.0001489574,0.000018285942,0.0021086803,0.0000646214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008608194,0.0041864137,0.19569653,0.003059795,0.0019091187,0.00009421891,0.13388564,0.0000140354905,0.00030049973,0.04092095,0.49041644,0.120908156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.048300877,0.010009213,0.29986492,0.0005938063,0.00028738833,0.00020006178,0.0018035112,0.00014891465,0.00009103621,0.014936037,0.622932,0.0008322111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036388842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003260596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13251558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082312916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069535826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949601437","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105374","title":"Ethical issues raised by cluster randomised trials conducted in low-resource settings: identifying gaps in the<i>Ottawa Statement</i>through an analysis of the PURE Malawi trial","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; Western University","funders":"Fogarty International Center; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; National Institutes of Health; Wellcome Trust; National Institute of Mental Health; Eli Lilly and Company","keywords":"Cluster randomised controlled trial; Psychological intervention; Resource (disambiguation); Research ethics; Medicine; Statement (logic); Clinical trial; Informed consent; Family medicine; Medical education; Public relations; Alternative medicine; Nursing; Political science; Law; Psychiatry; Computer science","score_opus":0.30765842156694995,"score_gpt":0.5830316325230943,"score_spread":0.27537321095614437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949601437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6572362,0.00071808335,0.0002502957,0.33915678,0.0005970305,0.0016659191,0.000019661004,0.0000077544555,0.00034827171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9559354,0.0048060245,0.00046921946,0.037534602,0.0007831615,0.000027515509,0.00003523209,0.00004154515,0.00036727113],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.943099,0.027978474,0.0077966833,0.0005814943,0.019809633,0.00073471136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64421874,0.34350327,0.0055748937,0.0020576178,0.0037057016,0.00093977386],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.35141826,0.00029755372,0.002770989,0.0004936149,0.00011006008,0.00011202735,0.0018626483,0.0047278847,0.0015238955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5073445,0.00015670783,0.0011438552,0.001963072,0.001187609,0.00023643572,0.00027644882,0.03740005,0.0000059001936],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"randomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.6588544,0.012382815,0.02542418,0.01022172,0.011760897,0.0014826095,0.1556387,0.002139138,0.019324247,0.02266118,0.07867209,0.0014380093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.8808519,0.0041826474,0.002654748,0.01656636,0.0040998263,0.00009266757,0.027753353,0.0053571914,0.003251406,0.01602147,0.038491,0.0006773965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025771285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011241668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3155248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018403195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004646922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2957375615","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105393","title":"To die, to sleep, perchance to dream? A response to DeMichelis, Shaul and Rapoport","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dream; Sleep (system call); Psychology; Computer science; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.03472695727304633,"score_gpt":0.3747503165877398,"score_spread":0.34002335931469346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2957375615","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07575851,0.00058357546,0.003159045,0.9147554,0.004792834,0.00072598405,0.000026375956,0.000016659373,0.00018159651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004737728,0.0008520728,0.0034157212,0.9754216,0.013650404,0.00001808573,0.000016268172,0.000068004505,0.0018200855],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99124074,0.00057535386,0.0010350182,0.0004557927,0.0061580017,0.0005350772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925765,0.003483649,0.00027032342,0.000456339,0.001377307,0.0018358976],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013116215,0.00035332917,0.0011871923,0.0008080942,0.00008732917,0.000054656703,0.00046045138,0.0031758503,0.00012644686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047855742,0.00026512853,0.00032171461,0.00042370803,0.00009842235,0.0000609224,0.00029928595,0.011842695,0.00022744048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033780008,0.000032446882,0.00035223574,0.00046590835,0.00016314913,0.003082882,0.0071625,0.000015957472,0.0010413323,0.0000064310084,0.97938436,0.0049147806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010490826,0.0011180295,0.0055799773,0.0047280635,0.00022084247,0.0004439088,0.00029164358,0.000008736725,0.00005766847,0.000038173002,0.98616236,0.00030148405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006352619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000061001992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07102078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002888153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028983927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2961892772","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105628","title":"Reply to ‘Hormone replacement therapy: informed consent without assessment?’","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Transgender; Informed consent; Anxiety; Hormone replacement therapy (female-to-male); Psychology; Psychotherapist; Medicine; Psychiatry; Alternative medicine; Testosterone (patch); Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.15367166487757813,"score_gpt":0.5057244705365359,"score_spread":0.3520528056589578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2961892772","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018073148,0.0016335095,0.00045917317,0.95565236,0.011094572,0.00059086946,0.000028650871,0.000031343792,0.028702239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00029399965,0.018524181,0.00044117984,0.9353724,0.017392222,0.000018246215,0.000033926022,0.00007529527,0.027848534],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868914,0.0016358176,0.0023051084,0.00043895218,0.0078350855,0.00089362386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885421,0.0066025406,0.0019758274,0.001051425,0.0010991666,0.000728977],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012919727,0.00047428417,0.0012340427,0.0006066954,0.00018313772,0.00013750784,0.0014588559,0.0054507125,0.003727688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008776218,0.00036043787,0.0004398079,0.00025841454,0.00032651328,0.00011231806,0.00019262492,0.028273916,0.0007702851],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004378202,0.00014949578,0.0016468914,0.001190646,0.0005163014,0.00087161723,0.0024340402,5.0626494e-7,0.000001908805,0.00041789556,0.9908248,0.0015080526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004011413,0.0020694726,0.0030855055,0.00057943066,0.00015574862,0.0009571513,0.00015135892,0.0000021128365,5.018549e-7,0.00044509475,0.98818636,0.0003558587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034215432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024453507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022823203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056506705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02278482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963447074","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105436","title":"The ‘serious’ factor in germline modification","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivism; Bioethics; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.08973882122951211,"score_gpt":0.46098667606249155,"score_spread":0.37124785483297945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963447074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6017674,0.004354532,0.00025217546,0.39078635,0.0014919332,0.0001934481,0.000001536046,0.000008186603,0.0011444502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97871065,0.014893159,0.00023942554,0.0048034405,0.0009676157,0.0000011556273,0.0000013753411,0.000010178728,0.00037297732],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953135,0.00027108795,0.00078879116,0.000097938806,0.0033207731,0.00020787952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99550956,0.00283221,0.00029314845,0.0002287002,0.0007950537,0.0003413373],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01014586,0.00008202413,0.0002884585,0.00009206122,0.00006549526,0.000022388635,0.0002916599,0.0010480573,0.0002257258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015386001,0.000046151414,0.0000997627,0.00020826889,0.00012541094,0.00005796312,0.000038216403,0.008719794,0.000033151515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024375867,0.0017825214,0.28220478,0.0056556454,0.00040722944,0.0026922817,0.05843177,0.00013730467,0.0014543189,0.22978573,0.012253857,0.40275696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0055810083,0.0016555965,0.1105993,0.0021414068,0.00007256468,0.0008412856,0.0025277517,0.004054702,0.00016632368,0.0077032996,0.8643832,0.00027354283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011981836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012212414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85212934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010339276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032370507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9935671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963890664","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2018-105138","title":"Delaying and withholding interventions: ethics and the stepped wedge trial","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Psychological intervention; Wedge (geometry); Intervention (counseling); Research ethics; Psychology; Research design; Social psychology; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Sociology; Psychiatry; Social science","score_opus":0.6371395408951888,"score_gpt":0.6422575864975051,"score_spread":0.0051180456023163234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963890664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5274418,0.0067548007,0.002414376,0.45984718,0.0014707056,0.0007382333,0.000001275826,0.000013514315,0.0013181082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94742113,0.039807167,0.001364695,0.009680019,0.0009278823,0.0000046196033,7.056681e-7,0.000020598962,0.0007731678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885406,0.0020086358,0.0013669725,0.00021141813,0.007606251,0.00026610534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.645301,0.34709287,0.0012639638,0.000713618,0.004185838,0.0014427556],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16143844,0.00012380196,0.0006252934,0.00013533217,0.00024151668,0.00009252793,0.00037592198,0.0025987045,0.00028188704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.482959,0.00006855668,0.0002761609,0.00017282253,0.0017792949,0.00010934583,0.00037499453,0.046383698,0.000010593141],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.140695,0.0011681684,0.009423304,0.017117944,0.0018205978,0.00094719545,0.03621019,0.000008039197,0.00027382863,0.7647239,0.0024738018,0.025138041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.59036064,0.010938824,0.0033198313,0.05759514,0.0015028546,0.004597551,0.01864541,0.003772431,0.00012486338,0.29016936,0.018373622,0.00059949607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000050567367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013928994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47455454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005041487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041493718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99869615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966938158","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105664","title":"Continuing the conversation about medical assistance in dying","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Hospital for Sick Children; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; World Wide Web; Medicine; Data science; Computer science; Internet privacy; Psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.16215409662767438,"score_gpt":0.4633856658181718,"score_spread":0.30123156919049743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966938158","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061360057,0.009486401,0.0013512633,0.9797422,0.002162471,0.00015852571,0.0000040796317,0.0000075630105,0.00095147913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022209655,0.029265467,0.00048340307,0.93772286,0.009630264,0.0000033022757,0.00003067543,0.00004405837,0.00061030267],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882729,0.0006970632,0.0013980791,0.00018600986,0.009132301,0.0003136663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871137,0.010070196,0.0012610874,0.00028211737,0.0010734302,0.00019948125],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012064611,0.00022436175,0.0010981193,0.00021983557,0.000029268287,0.00002397836,0.0006245877,0.004332367,0.0006119507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04578791,0.00013494994,0.00030096792,0.00021454056,0.00054400595,0.000074890704,0.00007734078,0.024830382,0.000014995777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000265454,0.000090767426,0.013651573,0.003243469,0.0004573719,0.007885296,0.019790199,0.0000036087174,0.000028418755,0.00026701984,0.9441704,0.010146381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024661797,0.00016878312,0.00073703646,0.04201664,0.00018684365,0.00032166447,0.0010321379,0.0003820051,0.000045837776,0.00012755055,0.95237726,0.00013803097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009492815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000057984627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04201934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001833432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037735177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973062329","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105703","title":"Professionalism eliminates religion as a proper tool for doctors rendering advice to patients","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Rendering (computer graphics); Public relations; Law; Sociology; Medicine; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.14767429283058933,"score_gpt":0.532210648759603,"score_spread":0.3845363559290137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973062329","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022301883,0.00036449957,0.0009976046,0.97229254,0.019173138,0.0022212393,0.000035644774,0.000064391024,0.0026207285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00080203597,0.0018768164,0.0037429598,0.9696431,0.015061862,0.00016731,0.00009519113,0.00016564575,0.008445077],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9710788,0.0082909325,0.0034374043,0.00062708603,0.015369076,0.0011967097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87895644,0.10748386,0.0035886548,0.00076670444,0.008566739,0.00063761126],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.059197318,0.00056193775,0.001349335,0.0004595153,0.001160604,0.000044565757,0.002056591,0.01770974,0.0010739071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5002123,0.0003862677,0.00043060762,0.00033791966,0.0003272775,0.0003480402,0.00081988226,0.14376976,0.0006432286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042931174,0.00013492751,0.00024645004,0.007254559,0.00015317333,0.00025080124,0.007195162,0.000001828035,0.0000053248236,0.0015697939,0.9816266,0.0011321224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022585634,0.00077200925,0.000097204436,0.02261011,0.00024387983,0.000042809334,0.0007198373,0.000025797259,0.0000056628614,0.009916677,0.96286315,0.00044433156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027471271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000039333576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44101498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007367157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017576817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982560574","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105742","title":"Arrogance of ‘but all you need is a good index finger’: A narrative ethics exploration of lack of universal funding of PSA screening in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Situated; Prostate cancer; Medicine; Prostate-specific antigen; Psychology; Medical education; Family medicine; Cancer; Internal medicine; Literature","score_opus":0.15473615486586234,"score_gpt":0.3850230815499141,"score_spread":0.23028692668405176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982560574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9624358,0.00080362364,0.0010260455,0.035140127,0.00023197985,0.00020858827,0.00003087743,0.0000016254961,0.000121327925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959673,0.0022929572,0.00076888414,0.0008840589,0.000049667946,0.0000014139714,0.000004920378,0.000010681972,0.000020064213],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956538,0.00023087219,0.0010803491,0.00012717629,0.0027287044,0.00017909953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99562705,0.00145634,0.0014025196,0.00016184477,0.0011477093,0.00020451804],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030927374,0.00012970432,0.00079025066,0.00018757588,0.00001819835,0.0000025304043,0.00017617784,0.00047475635,0.000119218465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027957496,0.000105361214,0.0001235585,0.00031270238,0.00019607956,0.00017073758,0.000050062696,0.0023869935,1.6359598e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004044608,0.0015451077,0.64980495,0.0062193736,0.0020803805,0.00053254724,0.31335327,0.003535973,0.00785846,0.004196996,0.0011340096,0.005694299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.056067154,0.014583123,0.11442142,0.08057622,0.0015362987,0.00021836376,0.5080506,0.014592,0.20256656,0.0026257643,0.0038428889,0.0009195943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11480562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.111155204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5353836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003511344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010586988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2986471684","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105832","title":"‘Serious’ factor—a relevant starting point for further debate: a response","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pluripotent Stem Cells Research","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivism; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Scope (computer science); Relevance (law); Engineering ethics; Perspective (graphical); Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology of scientific knowledge; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.045150253770958194,"score_gpt":0.3603575333974783,"score_spread":0.31520727962652006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2986471684","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015513168,0.0016472327,0.0050943987,0.97595614,0.0012375743,0.00038279322,0.00008732709,0.000006215048,0.00007516559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009185045,0.005112092,0.002044678,0.9609494,0.013068003,0.000019337574,0.00016440479,0.00021242736,0.009244589],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992402,0.001371867,0.0009866391,0.0003747627,0.0042376285,0.0006270733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946808,0.0025981113,0.0007905497,0.00047626905,0.0011976676,0.00025656098],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012673155,0.00030906382,0.0005849367,0.00014288837,0.0001014798,0.00008034629,0.001074466,0.0063058226,0.00021013652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030040272,0.00023354504,0.0005147853,0.00007175642,0.00021427732,0.0000059151735,0.00029723215,0.011649131,0.000024037385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017163622,0.000042857882,0.000012662833,0.00069557177,0.00028146972,0.00088642427,0.0002818275,0.0000069755974,0.03838322,0.000001468015,0.95659804,0.0010931235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013897151,0.0013540619,0.00001610692,0.00064844004,0.000046733327,0.00037232979,0.000082526014,0.00007725895,0.006941484,0.00015247514,0.98864335,0.0002755195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001601107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017672386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032045312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009542489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005286382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989452620","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105598","title":"Evidence first, practice second in arthroscopic surgery: use of placebo surgery in randomised controlled trial","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Healthcare cost, quality, practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Placebo; Randomized controlled trial; Evidence-based medicine; Clinical trial; Sham surgery; Arthroscopy; Surgery; Physical therapy; MEDLINE; Harm; Alternative medicine; General surgery; Psychology","score_opus":0.7215033332355886,"score_gpt":0.5864939803248994,"score_spread":0.13500935291068916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989452620","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8328852,0.0019042792,0.00006243006,0.15648322,0.005669093,0.0028256369,0.00000346457,0.000010038397,0.00015662819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9571625,0.019776234,0.00033875258,0.021368643,0.0009884527,0.00010917821,0.0000019013335,0.00003487904,0.00021948616],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9471844,0.03999767,0.0065267333,0.00032018303,0.005219681,0.0007513715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.32790804,0.66307735,0.006008312,0.0004524512,0.0019210081,0.000632861],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.22748366,0.0002407307,0.0027076167,0.0006867616,0.00014808463,0.000028668017,0.00040858408,0.0022955257,0.0031355054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.76995116,0.00018610718,0.00039138278,0.0006120111,0.00023719367,0.0017185283,0.00012842657,0.015129897,0.000062957384],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"randomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.8631692,0.0009284746,0.109325364,0.004153199,0.00016956877,0.00056662963,0.010134565,0.000030691408,0.000023293667,0.00034183398,0.010282137,0.00087505265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.8823776,0.0006844999,0.014208474,0.038417783,0.00015133082,0.00007529445,0.005643079,0.00045182236,0.000017354263,0.00033448474,0.057237644,0.00040062153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018382181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008899684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62307966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040694405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029517872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990077275","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105938","title":"Ottawa Statement does not impede randomised evaluation of government health programmes","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; Western University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Statement (logic); Government (linguistics); Alternative medicine; Medicine; Political science; Data science; Computer science; Law; Pathology","score_opus":0.1470914022423993,"score_gpt":0.4013036769081585,"score_spread":0.2542122746657592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990077275","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039848074,0.0022332761,0.0020547213,0.99009794,0.002701441,0.0010613127,0.00028710166,0.000005876313,0.0011598608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02384,0.015561532,0.0010134237,0.95443904,0.0039909207,0.000054007778,0.000050289014,0.000052323605,0.0009984446],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98934716,0.0008977648,0.004347265,0.00033548134,0.0045313044,0.00054101367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914547,0.0014605608,0.006002169,0.00038675606,0.0004534079,0.00024236088],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.076362155,0.0002583568,0.0014241259,0.00023744488,0.000071326234,0.00005275024,0.0006544535,0.0015977246,0.0007308477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010472543,0.00019742404,0.00041806945,0.000116531686,0.00012333319,0.00010618381,0.00011617705,0.0061819125,0.000034222583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020336763,0.0001963774,0.00013393196,0.004296328,0.000638465,0.000036550522,0.0022121598,0.00003788384,3.2306312e-7,0.015167285,0.9502897,0.026787603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008148002,0.0004427523,0.00008234577,0.00073577656,0.000068128844,0.00000771832,0.00017611384,0.0006020616,0.000010745974,0.0057255616,0.98381263,0.0001881425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026300466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004342459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06588961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012059805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00321082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992999517","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105855","title":"Conscientious objection and moral distress: a relational ethics case study of MAiD in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; St. Paul's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Bioethics; Conscientious objector; Health care; Constructive; Distress; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Computer science; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.15419557529169162,"score_gpt":0.5110393762624028,"score_spread":0.3568438009707112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992999517","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95845145,0.00020725607,0.00020146272,0.036983628,0.002788366,0.00032887765,0.000007832252,0.000004293177,0.0010268278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99532866,0.0003755954,0.00027264838,0.0037248472,0.00019952744,0.000003552985,0.0000014080093,0.000010492538,0.00008325369],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9839443,0.007521284,0.0015857046,0.00018530859,0.0064775776,0.0002858037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9379852,0.058695458,0.0011872634,0.00020644919,0.0014745248,0.0004511053],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.052028332,0.000114514456,0.0004302977,0.00015519939,0.0004310701,0.000006991197,0.00025325536,0.0015248696,0.0006786206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13763681,0.00009176118,0.000036698017,0.0003138668,0.00036949432,0.00018487191,0.00017799671,0.044985365,0.0000050149006],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003791908,0.0009585925,0.847918,0.0020542592,0.00015321287,0.009945413,0.10341014,0.00023995763,0.000029202429,0.031078849,0.0027520026,0.0010812193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01749864,0.0017447755,0.11779094,0.0066414666,0.0002585583,0.007699329,0.81685627,0.004187379,0.0000049754035,0.021698209,0.00515777,0.0004617119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67472535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9544414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73012704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005201701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030055968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995741260","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-106003","title":"Randomised evaluation of government health programmes does present a challenge to standard research ethics frameworks","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute for Health and Care Research; Wellcome Trust; Wellcome","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Data science; Political science; Medicine; Management science; Computer science; Medical education; Engineering","score_opus":0.3506682235857784,"score_gpt":0.4962058524877009,"score_spread":0.14553762890192246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995741260","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013641702,0.0069383862,0.0055359122,0.98107785,0.0024155707,0.0020515176,0.00023498833,0.000007588403,0.0016017767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019269403,0.05485161,0.00220489,0.912595,0.010013724,0.00018157296,0.00002926889,0.00010016167,0.0007543714],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97713965,0.00404749,0.0038939489,0.0006142367,0.0132451765,0.0010595212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856879,0.008256201,0.0026808549,0.0007052769,0.0021511717,0.0005185988],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20095307,0.00028929638,0.0016819341,0.00055582286,0.00018447617,0.00010455883,0.0011810693,0.006884576,0.0005464797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06503104,0.0002298038,0.00040635213,0.000356642,0.00027424993,0.00009830207,0.00036000268,0.044262674,0.000043291937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067517784,0.00024761423,0.000033889253,0.006145049,0.0005010336,0.000056477948,0.015261464,0.000096695985,4.622282e-8,0.040056832,0.8995012,0.03742454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048045507,0.0012259734,0.000024123796,0.0026883974,0.000034049055,0.000005123564,0.0005731781,0.00044082906,0.0000022236954,0.037975937,0.95202583,0.00019977956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021370198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006485681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13592203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018962928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007253247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996349300","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105423","title":"A matter of time: grappling with everyday ethical tensions at the confluence between policy and practice in a psychiatric unit","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Mental Health and Patient Involvement","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mental Health Research Canada; Jewish General Hospital; McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Normative; Context (archaeology); Mental health; Sociology; Empirical research; Research ethics; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Nursing; Social psychology; Medicine; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Psychotherapist; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.2047073622465824,"score_gpt":0.5184810182540115,"score_spread":0.3137736560074291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996349300","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77981424,0.0003962008,0.00012208374,0.21749477,0.0002134118,0.0004934374,0.000008938375,0.0000030187048,0.0014538997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88812846,0.0018263247,0.00095879624,0.108173974,0.00042243485,0.000009459839,0.0000068730897,0.000016971906,0.00045668686],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.993983,0.0021550092,0.0010540101,0.00012467636,0.0023503003,0.00033302474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9758791,0.022132477,0.0008809974,0.00017815415,0.00052125956,0.00040806792],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016753383,0.000106221676,0.00035879502,0.00016889806,0.00028197328,0.0000039989413,0.00023935041,0.0009892839,0.00050137844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043250155,0.00005673452,0.000039160474,0.00037984535,0.00026028912,0.000070807204,0.00015431193,0.009048663,0.00011022707],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013951879,0.0002231014,0.9624509,0.0029632584,0.00008183542,0.000033274642,0.024547145,0.000029086079,0.00005723997,0.0032345324,0.0040329355,0.00095148117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02649749,0.007758407,0.5574783,0.04214907,0.0006751143,0.0008181291,0.035636835,0.0007320673,0.000059285256,0.010898611,0.31635633,0.00094034686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090175326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025590035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40497258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000094254676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037878975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9932375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996508770","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105837","title":"Imperfect by design: the problematic ethics of surgical training","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Innovations in Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Deontological ethics; Quality (philosophy); Social contract; Intervention (counseling); Psychology; Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development; Individualism; Medical ethics; Compromise; Medical education; Engineering ethics; Moral reasoning; Public relations; Medicine; Nursing; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Politics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10107702552971778,"score_gpt":0.4283887677613671,"score_spread":0.32731174223164927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996508770","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.236738,0.00083383,0.024908472,0.7341101,0.0018072313,0.000557097,0.0000014059418,0.00001765722,0.0010261841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823438,0.0012571445,0.007165715,0.0084291,0.00062705576,0.000005316184,0.0000046419136,0.00002191758,0.000145335],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99120206,0.00090967177,0.0013149113,0.00012491584,0.0061992127,0.0002492154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861608,0.010627239,0.0008398816,0.00033164342,0.0017983672,0.00024205304],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04300478,0.0001331179,0.00055671396,0.00013621643,0.00009396334,0.000015407692,0.0004388212,0.0013863827,0.0011638777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055231288,0.00007419785,0.00016601168,0.0005320538,0.0005578359,0.00007717072,0.000045782537,0.0115862945,0.000018708766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024781402,0.0050529293,0.00613593,0.017703127,0.0025260106,0.0008617704,0.27600047,0.00048701305,0.016180515,0.14016435,0.322028,0.21038173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.050947875,0.021364935,0.004762915,0.06468492,0.0034397827,0.042186923,0.069851555,0.05191679,0.01461233,0.07780439,0.5962965,0.0021310714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011674934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000010161018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74560577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009183341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068045915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998470554","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105902","title":"Pain versus suffering: a distinction currently without a difference","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nociception; Neglect; Psychology; Noxious stimulus; Pain management; Interpretation (philosophy); Medicine; Cognitive psychology; Anesthesia; Philosophy; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.19201187650700743,"score_gpt":0.545512322988399,"score_spread":0.35350044648139156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998470554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4820292,0.0009886494,0.11135877,0.3347542,0.045674965,0.00081605284,0.0000063045686,0.00013622816,0.024235638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850052,0.001358748,0.00097058667,0.009748246,0.0021945392,0.00000782313,0.0000027037333,0.000027134185,0.00068499387],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9795765,0.010981665,0.001339934,0.00022286814,0.0073728655,0.00050616375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8831852,0.11170755,0.0016290382,0.00046233987,0.0018747195,0.0011411197],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09296356,0.0001792146,0.0005130075,0.00011716661,0.0005284361,0.000018640936,0.0007810445,0.0024574334,0.0034513343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.39359707,0.00012921373,0.00013788203,0.00023019267,0.0003877095,0.00018037345,0.00024594064,0.051848143,0.00036870854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0113136,0.002475288,0.3807087,0.013542048,0.0010060964,0.0007931449,0.073711164,0.000032472122,0.00097363995,0.33392125,0.056046408,0.12547618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03098057,0.0056730798,0.045467198,0.026862947,0.00058919244,0.00023744562,0.038175028,0.013749836,0.000027942024,0.06868707,0.7682532,0.0012964797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011282114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020425717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7122068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025791372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005429305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999165778","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105498","title":"Institutional conflict of interest: attempting to crack the deferiprone mystery","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Deferiprone; Harm; Benchmarking; Conflict of interest; Medicine; Context (archaeology); Research ethics; Informed consent; Family medicine; Alternative medicine; Law; Psychiatry; Political science; History; Business; Internal medicine; Pathology","score_opus":0.8777700041918854,"score_gpt":0.645740413460299,"score_spread":0.23202959073158647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999165778","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4542284,0.0011547684,0.0014997807,0.54047567,0.0015272191,0.00018767371,0.000025414165,0.000014726827,0.00088632834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8774493,0.0006161406,0.00013925522,0.1202009,0.0015504143,0.000002896107,0.0000016647471,0.000008135819,0.000031321622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99601007,0.0012786528,0.0010310146,0.00014305003,0.0012207968,0.0003164149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943017,0.0031090712,0.00040873312,0.00010030128,0.0006600051,0.0014202127],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008682473,0.00014564194,0.0003848732,0.000054147156,0.00024914564,0.000015486748,0.0008037239,0.0014816601,0.002117116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012402386,0.00009660289,0.00015190108,0.00028477295,0.0006573131,0.000097728596,0.00021473726,0.01386759,0.0000653107],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013506313,0.0028288634,0.036242988,0.007855961,0.0034324827,0.0046711224,0.11957311,0.0063621663,0.07309829,0.26211035,0.24001902,0.23029935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021131686,0.000744588,0.0012575589,0.00060419494,0.000187002,0.00047748582,0.001586829,0.002586172,0.0107723605,0.00046825016,0.9790059,0.00019652625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010471877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016066782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73898685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005505347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019011487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3002608497","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105865","title":"Communities of practice: acknowledging vulnerability to improve resilience in healthcare teams","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Health care; Burnout; Psychology; Work (physics); Psychological resilience; Compassion fatigue; Perspective (graphical); Compassion; Resilience (materials science); Witness; Engineering ethics; Nursing; Knowledge management; Medicine; Social psychology; Political science; Computer science; Computer security; Engineering","score_opus":0.13426388710542903,"score_gpt":0.5375039715334836,"score_spread":0.4032400844280546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3002608497","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17903386,0.0019913358,0.0013030827,0.81516594,0.0015712356,0.00044027148,0.000019776484,0.000015624102,0.0004588702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92688936,0.002795626,0.0020448314,0.06733242,0.0008750978,0.000014763406,0.0000017952805,0.000015372181,0.000030762014],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98631155,0.0071271886,0.0023475916,0.00017769406,0.0034913425,0.0005446175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9703317,0.02306971,0.0012681443,0.00033789192,0.003646066,0.0013464498],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.027661035,0.00015770918,0.00073884113,0.00014759508,0.0004633923,0.0000075753123,0.0008456637,0.0013061234,0.00035985408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13817641,0.00011619949,0.00010147954,0.00048792546,0.0002488552,0.00024211426,0.00047147958,0.018217972,0.000024028022],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027384874,0.0011037188,0.24234115,0.019410579,0.000095231364,0.00032283118,0.5258517,0.0001029663,0.0005673798,0.016025007,0.013921169,0.17751977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007494164,0.004745874,0.052428707,0.084768206,0.0000851241,0.000062392835,0.7031409,0.0030704516,0.0003969403,0.007023472,0.1359663,0.00081743544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041960212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004482484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7478555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026204495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013782709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004493427","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105866","title":"Decolonising ideas of healing in medical education","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Global Health and Surgery","field":"Medicine","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's Health Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sociology; Flourishing; Racism; Health care; Consumerism; Colonialism; Pluralism (philosophy); Cultural humility; Curriculum; Public relations; Political science; Engineering ethics; Gender studies; Cultural competence; Pedagogy; Psychology; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07757810093637647,"score_gpt":0.4629370808619998,"score_spread":0.38535897992562335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004493427","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49061528,0.002984122,0.0008019878,0.50416857,0.0008043357,0.00006726864,4.5305944e-7,0.0000054887046,0.00055247743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92129594,0.002371896,0.0008849296,0.07466982,0.00076550856,4.7405814e-7,0.0000014453198,0.0000062171334,0.0000037712193],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99430823,0.00024254956,0.0011041438,0.00008591218,0.004036327,0.00022284864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995917,0.0012939882,0.00035026728,0.00007431317,0.0005666458,0.0017977827],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009249863,0.000071337185,0.00047094174,0.00011360095,0.000027715201,0.0000042748247,0.00015555946,0.0008087242,0.00040038326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07507369,0.000055193475,0.00011157655,0.00030550978,0.00012614118,0.00004736885,0.000032693468,0.003833062,0.000004193801],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005643432,0.0048459587,0.3114758,0.0151638575,0.00026682013,0.008458411,0.023445167,0.00007264051,0.00036213093,0.03715571,0.09637868,0.49673137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.040470075,0.010789236,0.26619497,0.10243835,0.00074449624,0.021065522,0.01855102,0.03932096,0.0016103354,0.029838167,0.46758825,0.0013886355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013715443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000070278336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49534276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000084455336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026104387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004964361","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105702","title":"Minority report: can minor parents refuse treatment for their child?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Wellcome Trust; Wellcome","keywords":"Minor (academic); Neglect; Discretion; Autonomy; Best interests; Psychology; Welfare; Social psychology; Medicine; Law; Political science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.16392755112368648,"score_gpt":0.4460267368020968,"score_spread":0.2820991856784103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004964361","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11468294,0.0044068904,0.00070672866,0.87708956,0.0014421364,0.00045334303,0.00005386037,0.000029043364,0.0011354793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9561608,0.007291324,0.001617499,0.026518947,0.00815265,0.0000057898696,0.000032464988,0.00002331879,0.00019722551],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955108,0.00020455064,0.0011144918,0.00023250248,0.0026255208,0.00031209172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99485046,0.0014649695,0.0005697197,0.00023522564,0.0012117643,0.0016678798],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004312037,0.00019254781,0.0006817633,0.00006652663,0.00015012498,0.000020881766,0.00025798118,0.0012895548,0.000106080486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026585938,0.000121894715,0.00035575358,0.0001667074,0.00016215946,0.000041949395,0.00004670185,0.0045385016,0.0000029198063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008839634,0.007839959,0.11346687,0.020639142,0.0044470793,0.07128547,0.28679347,0.000027385162,0.00030501396,0.022049423,0.12938382,0.33492273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0068695126,0.0058633373,0.0015848229,0.0009404744,0.000538011,0.0041125,0.0025561152,0.00035972233,0.0005743874,0.0010078187,0.9753326,0.00026068633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003427533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021681134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8505706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017607276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048718033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007004323","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105859","title":"One health ethics: a response to pragmatism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Zoonotic diseases and public health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Normative; Vagueness; Epistemology; Articulation (sociology); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Engineering ethics; Management science; Computer science; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Artificial intelligence; Politics","score_opus":0.16331303589157947,"score_gpt":0.4622727494870138,"score_spread":0.29895971359543433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007004323","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015641894,0.0009524093,0.016362049,0.96593916,0.00039209216,0.00023117606,0.000008087486,0.000027490989,0.00044561588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33932012,0.0017238886,0.0075591938,0.6496829,0.0016248776,0.0000020201219,0.0000025943891,0.000022146782,0.00006226136],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98972994,0.0016049516,0.0012095816,0.00018771751,0.006856266,0.0004115649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98698264,0.004680116,0.00047346562,0.00022873544,0.001049619,0.0065854085],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.031790603,0.00012701355,0.00068046484,0.00013858796,0.00012313073,0.000032017277,0.00032940475,0.0008902674,0.001264788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15719885,0.0001014049,0.00017673442,0.00040079167,0.00012689261,0.00007543045,0.00009095315,0.009533138,0.00008087974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.024129728,0.002815066,0.0004094467,0.01133809,0.0007796623,0.003699921,0.26985496,0.00005420514,0.00029887518,0.05764859,0.24822882,0.38074264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0050847894,0.008811298,0.009422242,0.0053231213,0.00010987461,0.00062826846,0.0037071188,0.0005473214,0.000016651213,0.0010325536,0.9651141,0.00020263289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011936846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001887332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7168853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015273255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037820224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013410412","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-106020","title":"Commentary on ‘Four types of gender bias affecting women surgeons, and their cumulative impact’ by Hutchison","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Diversity and Career in Medicine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Injustice; Implicit bias; Gender bias; Representation (politics); Psychology; Social psychology; Sex discrimination; Prejudice (legal term); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.14307503071990565,"score_gpt":0.383922980026222,"score_spread":0.24084794930631634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013410412","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026399195,0.0007068965,0.00006568627,0.970776,0.0009355688,0.00008817305,0.000056648998,0.000009360863,0.00096244924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14068562,0.0038176219,0.000020197618,0.8518644,0.0034967996,4.2636532e-7,0.000017291035,0.000014192462,0.000083433006],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99199235,0.0017645756,0.00045980825,0.00015379016,0.0052927043,0.00033674377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906714,0.007733479,0.0007078509,0.00009092004,0.00034858985,0.00044776456],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01258578,0.0001953569,0.0006929846,0.00012748963,0.00027038777,0.000047639984,0.00065694755,0.0016143002,0.00061036967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00961663,0.00013324771,0.00019463235,0.00017885055,0.00087786803,0.00009300123,0.00013734824,0.010708789,0.00000227848],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005128269,0.00003222144,0.00087061216,0.00017171993,0.00030505136,0.00032402514,0.076040864,0.0000016569564,0.0000017515032,0.000028034634,0.9202001,0.0019726502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080144656,0.0007588415,0.00013738549,0.0011713307,0.000119495715,0.000021890766,0.05418261,0.000019191395,0.00001126065,0.0018906266,0.9406813,0.00020464897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012304304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008403188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1189116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024384589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012986093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014035919","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-106158","title":"Implicit bias, women surgeons and institutional solutions: commentary","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Diversity and Career in Medicine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Data science; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.1494513442587247,"score_gpt":0.36359232573195727,"score_spread":0.21414098147323257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014035919","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004268903,0.0010242304,0.00028619522,0.9944493,0.0021786916,0.00006563798,0.000043099248,0.000014866031,0.0015110681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016978902,0.013409893,0.00008712124,0.97507423,0.009557587,0.0000013538283,0.000027181724,0.0000064147603,0.00013833653],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890526,0.00092608895,0.00048624384,0.0001450854,0.008972146,0.00041787117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99552184,0.0028701285,0.00035519098,0.00008582368,0.0004961781,0.00067080813],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01397934,0.00013918329,0.00044693888,0.00014290855,0.00090200204,0.0000986459,0.0009602579,0.0021485616,0.0011214358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012651649,0.000118864285,0.0001347359,0.00020672753,0.0023916857,0.00015514967,0.0002723311,0.014425613,0.000011226864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011243511,0.000022501243,0.00018526465,0.00011439932,0.00011661754,0.0019591432,0.0119865835,3.0972788e-7,1.7516751e-7,0.0023200484,0.9812606,0.002023142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042717753,0.000101587764,0.00006268431,0.00050748425,0.00007913501,0.00009364327,0.00937312,0.00000413165,9.307403e-8,0.003826655,0.98540956,0.000114706585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001432051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037461173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019375099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003446756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056812568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014271418","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-106216","title":"Defending the distinction between pregnancy and parenthood","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Counterexample; Argumentative; Psychology; Pregnancy; Epistemology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.19240444746190496,"score_gpt":0.42055750491735533,"score_spread":0.22815305745545036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014271418","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20313393,0.007395148,0.007019225,0.78155494,0.00029804278,0.00013893076,0.0000011809691,0.00003552397,0.000423103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919189,0.0047808895,0.0004100989,0.0019634173,0.0009150822,0.0000010207465,5.6952405e-7,0.0000047282874,0.0000052698233],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981053,0.00009687626,0.0003287817,0.000093566705,0.0012615795,0.000113883754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985266,0.0006930845,0.00019643262,0.000089368936,0.00019409719,0.00030046052],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019290437,0.000057342342,0.00020880355,0.000028889444,0.00009862637,0.000009788581,0.00011536517,0.00034311644,0.000026965346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030116381,0.000029763349,0.000046789126,0.00012309801,0.00022855296,0.0000410131,0.00005819356,0.003335193,0.0000019717188],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026552688,0.00011375638,0.34484792,0.0018723861,0.00023007725,0.00043247172,0.0060925297,8.841041e-7,0.00015729923,0.012455727,0.004134305,0.6293971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0076945964,0.00717504,0.70083654,0.011625192,0.0011383491,0.0033676194,0.011734608,0.00029370488,0.0027513443,0.026746077,0.22622147,0.00041547365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000041112007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000010545746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.788785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017409193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000498539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99896413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3018488496","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-106232","title":"Meaningful futility: requests for resuscitation against medical recommendation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; William Osler Health System","funders":"","keywords":"Existentialism; Psychology; Internet privacy; Medicine; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.38548304528496485,"score_gpt":0.5302068286167412,"score_spread":0.14472378333177632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3018488496","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06381269,0.0014973514,0.07942082,0.85139614,0.0013382435,0.00026644854,0.000016584305,0.00003613196,0.002215567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86788374,0.02132242,0.026146932,0.078642026,0.00576501,0.000007793542,0.0001424239,0.000045421464,0.00004423114],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949265,0.00030038934,0.0010180026,0.0001509801,0.003426429,0.00017770422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934553,0.0034098835,0.00055865437,0.00010045942,0.0016278966,0.0008478158],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008289509,0.000117094365,0.00051107723,0.0000915759,0.00005531999,0.000010514319,0.0002229929,0.0008633075,0.00032155265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13223602,0.00008938755,0.0002028542,0.00021060134,0.00019452973,0.00012096328,0.00004245391,0.002502499,0.000005071757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007252762,0.0011235779,0.01618805,0.0074317516,0.0014174529,0.0010525829,0.073555216,0.0000198579,0.0025780762,0.014669371,0.21119708,0.6635142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011098721,0.0035303591,0.0015503425,0.011785875,0.0004230319,0.00013737948,0.006356057,0.012149287,0.003907146,0.004343375,0.9444167,0.00030175282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011460017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025644953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80407107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007932653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00253258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3018952689","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105762","title":"Considering medical assistance in dying for minors: the complexities of children’s voices","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Children's Rights and Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Legislation; Deliberation; Context (archaeology); Agency (philosophy); Supreme court; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; History; Politics; Social science","score_opus":0.18046653222085493,"score_gpt":0.42534168230524694,"score_spread":0.244875150084392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3018952689","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5627866,0.0007845668,0.0033823587,0.43179032,0.00039467006,0.00015783131,0.0000051709653,0.000008169057,0.0006903147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946144,0.0004290005,0.00035326552,0.003547503,0.0010408,0.0000017562642,8.112182e-7,0.000004012007,0.000008422213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957369,0.0004367916,0.0006069963,0.00007667179,0.0029686121,0.00017403535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99506134,0.004022442,0.00035479077,0.00004926354,0.00025079973,0.00026135132],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008252913,0.00006107546,0.00024466432,0.000033895507,0.00022471146,0.0000412408,0.00042938182,0.00034936596,0.00029695552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019557694,0.000036766975,0.00008847193,0.00014162732,0.00084902206,0.00010554088,0.00003387239,0.0013614227,7.232764e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003110909,0.00026164882,0.047826074,0.0003646918,0.00020787392,0.00006144978,0.44132027,0.00016421237,0.000037550115,0.4881561,0.006554949,0.014734059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.019035418,0.0022687851,0.1539828,0.012699011,0.0006204377,0.00022876512,0.1396248,0.029924639,0.0018701238,0.1826932,0.45536584,0.0016861919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00095917116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009793231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44881088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028900338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018245669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.988701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3019376897","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-106127","title":"In the name of science: animal appellations and best practice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Extant taxon; Psychology; Animal cognition; Animal welfare; Empathy; Epistemology; Social psychology; Political science; Cognition; Biology; Law","score_opus":0.33705102492054556,"score_gpt":0.5235440175295517,"score_spread":0.18649299260900615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3019376897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.743589,0.0006141693,0.0003228187,0.25289625,0.00007880239,0.000030471941,0.0000011791925,0.000002607272,0.0024646774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948229,0.00051454984,0.0015734843,0.0027974278,0.00028456037,1.375425e-7,4.105954e-8,0.000002516952,0.000004351656],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973871,0.00024290544,0.0003063429,0.0000682957,0.0019092419,0.000086114655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959468,0.0032769507,0.00027481586,0.00004521097,0.00032470643,0.0001314752],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067647714,0.00004309158,0.000113393864,0.00004388812,0.00008313354,0.000017935748,0.00034274714,0.00010871989,0.000051157735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04570062,0.000023484583,0.0000245678,0.00024073556,0.00090325385,0.000231371,0.00007308186,0.0020269451,0.000004014661],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005330572,0.0041532293,0.016162507,0.0013142254,0.00026946416,0.012353853,0.6573,0.00011398138,0.050206624,0.21187548,0.01252943,0.0283906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0099357,0.09073182,0.05338913,0.0068039545,0.0005647746,0.040166717,0.37417135,0.0640657,0.0014028472,0.027178125,0.33041975,0.0011701336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005043991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016611134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31789032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008793381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068399054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96233785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022335197","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-105758","title":"Becoming a medical assistance in dying (MAiD) provider: an exploration of the conditions that produce conscientious participation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Hamilton Health Sciences; London Health Sciences Centre; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Supreme court; Narrative; Context (archaeology); Taboo; Identity (music); Diversity (politics); Sociology; Qualitative research; Public relations; Law; Psychology; Nursing; Political science; Medicine; Social science; Aesthetics; History","score_opus":0.4504026941685684,"score_gpt":0.5768303361776258,"score_spread":0.12642764200905743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022335197","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2422763,0.00020222762,0.022946456,0.7311814,0.0022263264,0.00052169047,0.0000048449097,0.000025400284,0.0006153943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96809214,0.00036258844,0.0007757968,0.029898612,0.0008044146,0.000027130582,0.000003358984,0.00001593232,0.000020015654],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97955936,0.009685984,0.0018542159,0.0002509649,0.008276382,0.00037311143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96864116,0.02582443,0.0024070593,0.00038823398,0.0016906428,0.0010484745],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.053762425,0.00012954348,0.0004227437,0.00009755271,0.0007657953,0.000023024331,0.0008594856,0.0014675225,0.00071396976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3856555,0.00008866546,0.00009179605,0.0005828062,0.0009703542,0.0011517451,0.00020967486,0.02292945,0.000011971868],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001021459,0.0026194884,0.12079326,0.006713773,0.00023734731,0.00056773744,0.56545365,0.00053057633,0.0025452992,0.2713348,0.01805978,0.010122806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.029749848,0.0029688403,0.046742577,0.05709617,0.0010466158,0.00031708105,0.34998435,0.10005678,0.0028293782,0.33288527,0.0745683,0.0017547864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010553511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021383618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72581583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015485048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010096676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025127070","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-106048","title":"Trust, trustworthiness and sharing patient data for research","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Affect (linguistics); Coproduction; Argumentative; Public relations; Trustworthiness; Data sharing; Task (project management); Computer science; Internet privacy; Political science; Psychology; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.9050580209888535,"score_gpt":0.7105736966228733,"score_spread":0.19448432436598018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3025127070","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09204364,0.0023201793,0.0051026125,0.89870673,0.00048174433,0.0004566185,0.00002656538,0.000017242863,0.0008446844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91837746,0.026418736,0.014775469,0.034777872,0.005270448,0.000009906826,0.000026164887,0.00006744028,0.00027652035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98478526,0.00038057024,0.0011322398,0.00041712497,0.012854724,0.0004301015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7463444,0.2231744,0.0010142191,0.0026858316,0.018898375,0.007882778],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08303265,0.00010776174,0.0005072343,0.00012524739,0.00018809938,0.00006932963,0.0013741223,0.0018636936,0.0002299984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6466943,0.0000757743,0.00009788577,0.00035379909,0.00087836856,0.00014334357,0.0016290982,0.026910715,0.0000057437674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017599639,0.002736381,0.0420038,0.035640873,0.0018281374,0.0081060985,0.038607087,0.000037201033,0.0010333656,0.3493993,0.17919464,0.32381347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.020035869,0.01740188,0.004223383,0.01485782,0.0004956867,0.0017130672,0.00951161,0.09049675,0.00058508397,0.23486342,0.60515463,0.00066079985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029688536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000070203336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86392885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005399715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074730213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3027748832","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-106278","title":"What healthcare professionals owe us: why their duty to treat during a pandemic is contingent on personal protective equipment (PPE)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Disaster Response and Management","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Personal protective equipment; Health care; Pandemic; Duty; Obligation; Business; Politics; Public relations; Medicine; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Disease; Law","score_opus":0.20089245256139923,"score_gpt":0.494825231207298,"score_spread":0.29393277864589873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3027748832","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43152514,0.00051127217,0.0005988189,0.5650752,0.0010076306,0.0010434039,0.000012175337,0.000029409986,0.00019691752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.640808,0.0018323676,0.000086143955,0.35467482,0.0014488786,0.00013320615,0.0000021834337,0.00003637637,0.0009780289],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99171674,0.0023203713,0.0011547859,0.00034497192,0.0038346874,0.00062844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99558294,0.0015361926,0.0006629351,0.00018608557,0.00065877294,0.0013730545],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007018172,0.00026562132,0.0006088035,0.00015859939,0.00063836516,0.00004397495,0.0005009162,0.0008025607,0.0011502336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004350282,0.00017081489,0.00021983661,0.00023634292,0.000080151796,0.00023243936,0.000455243,0.0067840754,0.00013080637],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0083326455,0.00078012317,0.0023930883,0.0051813913,0.00041106567,0.00057753286,0.86952,0.000008643645,0.00073538726,0.0011879079,0.08726804,0.023604162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010349936,0.0051428746,0.0062196706,0.046105582,0.00016055832,0.00007162143,0.48628435,0.0002435653,0.0008342737,0.0014949441,0.4423342,0.0007584125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007064373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014143554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38323566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044658734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026839518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035163907","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-106320","title":"Triage of critical care resources in COVID-19: a stronger role for justice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Disaster Response and Management","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Dalhousie University","keywords":"Triage; Equity (law); Resource allocation; Health care rationing; Assertion; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Economic Justice; Distributive justice; Psychology; Public relations; Medicine; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; Health care; Medical emergency; Law; Management","score_opus":0.2317662887747113,"score_gpt":0.5526221910036272,"score_spread":0.3208559022289159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035163907","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021043472,0.0019257677,0.0059426134,0.9878986,0.0016441379,0.000581656,0.00009551329,0.000012159322,0.0016891101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033380475,0.0005010289,0.0006992323,0.9873898,0.0074241115,0.000049072776,0.000027459793,0.00004217586,0.000529074],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990136,0.003379369,0.0018351375,0.00024481886,0.003880294,0.0005243291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97129095,0.026199233,0.0008621606,0.0002543259,0.0007284138,0.00066493184],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00880729,0.000224944,0.0009739504,0.00033869778,0.00021495135,0.000018400338,0.00089456636,0.0033938654,0.00089347037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12271421,0.00017406046,0.00030443605,0.00017220202,0.0003341496,0.000076952245,0.00030149493,0.021373438,0.000014196599],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009965067,0.00007164891,0.000012729062,0.030240003,0.000073374016,0.0017724669,0.071995,0.0000041336507,0.0000016005263,0.0012893968,0.89282143,0.0007217197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027171033,0.0004547661,0.0000063530592,0.0034867541,0.00048573426,0.000008833031,0.074462116,0.00004225809,5.673912e-7,0.0020685708,0.9161371,0.00012986701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010310485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016142718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11390691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002826392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00884338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99789995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038525376","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2019-106047","title":"Value promotion as a goal of medicine","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Health; Alberta Health Services","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Promotion (chess); Value (mathematics); Organ donation; Extant taxon; Evidence-based medicine; Public relations; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Alternative medicine; Medicine; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Transplantation; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.28570191978815423,"score_gpt":0.5955445980730166,"score_spread":0.3098426782848624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038525376","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019670177,0.000687824,0.015166318,0.94756424,0.0022118709,0.00023092135,0.0000026742086,0.000015932203,0.014450029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.941247,0.003670262,0.0028253838,0.048644874,0.0034948161,0.0000024885805,0.00000175096,0.000022539227,0.00009089024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9806609,0.0071904855,0.0024467027,0.00014620603,0.009276881,0.00027879726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.951429,0.041437406,0.0028141758,0.00022441644,0.0029864719,0.0011085414],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.064676344,0.0001240155,0.00072618993,0.00010310143,0.00021120817,0.00000155767,0.00075151585,0.0023541402,0.004104434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5821915,0.000083570536,0.00012331555,0.00039048056,0.0014613963,0.00014153314,0.00019421578,0.034069553,0.000047084708],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012514694,0.0007101816,0.0024995166,0.010486565,0.00036576635,0.0004903138,0.13279718,0.000020963163,0.0045267097,0.77355766,0.06486679,0.008426857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02264693,0.016949834,0.003444616,0.045287628,0.0012293791,0.0005555658,0.06565948,0.0034350636,0.0016983649,0.57672673,0.26176915,0.000597293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018622132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021055448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9215768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060975846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007583135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3052480326","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-106719","title":"Is it unethical to publish data from Chinese transplant research?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Publication; Appeal; China; Argument (complex analysis); Publishing; Research ethics; Law; Medical ethics; Criminology; Political science; Medicine; Psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.3610681569847575,"score_gpt":0.5023686128895674,"score_spread":0.14130045590480983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3052480326","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033184534,0.00033722847,0.002184735,0.99323237,0.0018222495,0.00022773587,0.0008907734,0.000024045476,0.0009489923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005309341,0.004307617,0.0010992361,0.96287274,0.023499995,0.0000018100432,0.0024007184,0.000057289977,0.0004512771],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97952896,0.0010607343,0.0013108712,0.00053027587,0.017140474,0.00042867227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880347,0.0068655764,0.00032841985,0.00074943644,0.0027031102,0.0013187127],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009680756,0.00029816272,0.0009274944,0.00051514164,0.00012692163,0.00016218818,0.0019671917,0.0052421074,0.007119777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039847437,0.00021108033,0.00022285979,0.00069120177,0.0003641499,0.00023912557,0.00018257575,0.05876172,0.00033244304],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035369318,0.00008836865,0.00021619082,0.00075239886,0.00033074906,0.012471971,0.0064003184,1.6391408e-7,0.000023458564,0.00003001268,0.9789041,0.00042852917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020824452,0.0003916793,0.0006728032,0.0032567556,0.00036810953,0.0005292555,0.00013096408,0.00018985114,0.00002529647,0.0009049776,0.9912547,0.00019315521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019992024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001813048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05351961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106248546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070071793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081642488","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-106530","title":"Public involvement in the governance of population-level biomedical research: unresolved questions and future directions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; McGill University","funders":"National Institute for Health and Care Research; Wellcome Trust; Wellcome","keywords":"Corporate governance; Public relations; Population; Stakeholder; Value pluralism; Political science; Public health; Research ethics; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Business; Medicine; Politics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.7802038985801858,"score_gpt":0.6038874730519642,"score_spread":0.17631642552822158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081642488","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041722983,0.002974092,0.00038915203,0.9539859,0.00031237528,0.00020241746,0.000012737015,0.000006742667,0.0003935742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9213994,0.06494958,0.0019283872,0.009578533,0.0020795322,0.0000070335523,0.00000721444,0.000012876754,0.000037451682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98211277,0.001678066,0.0012764975,0.000214568,0.0143897785,0.00032832098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92977005,0.062667675,0.00058907573,0.00051039783,0.004769338,0.0016934638],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05735475,0.00009664531,0.0003977594,0.0001874572,0.00016886312,0.000037586044,0.00063726003,0.0014687722,0.00022100493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.33642462,0.00005882553,0.00011777698,0.0012456278,0.0014316275,0.00010187042,0.0002260382,0.021979252,0.000002961134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007292806,0.0029086792,0.046555772,0.0030385142,0.00030809766,0.00095705484,0.026133312,0.0000029138141,0.00031107524,0.8528248,0.018721336,0.047509145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0060404763,0.0039731385,0.45604005,0.005171868,0.0001139827,0.0004021202,0.01186381,0.0013412827,0.000034641194,0.08826931,0.42652118,0.00022814753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047110577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002169496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9444074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011752988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005584107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088056573","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-106504","title":"SARS-CoV-2 challenge studies: ethics and risk minimisation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Research ethics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Public health; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Ethical issues; Risk assessment; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Psychology; Psychiatry; Computer science; Nursing; Disease; Pathology","score_opus":0.36934024980375346,"score_gpt":0.5119479436296944,"score_spread":0.14260769382594096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088056573","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3491133,0.005498046,0.0022482232,0.6421394,0.0003164912,0.000109755136,0.000002694154,0.000017596658,0.0005545675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8118407,0.16995585,0.000657852,0.016167993,0.0013411813,0.0000014337996,8.5651436e-7,0.000013572252,0.000020582016],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99547684,0.0006005552,0.00052402425,0.00013271823,0.0030940708,0.00017181384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99508816,0.0028801595,0.0002431585,0.00008634488,0.0012677462,0.00043441058],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009969664,0.00010456722,0.000398313,0.00009287215,0.00019777368,0.000021599075,0.000109874214,0.00096940296,0.000060833358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06521874,0.00007113338,0.00011479116,0.00019169091,0.00040012904,0.00008860442,0.000095169875,0.012308107,0.000014187278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0042665587,0.002511989,0.018048823,0.013622751,0.0069422117,0.006403836,0.39802176,0.000029462686,0.022463612,0.016744388,0.19058736,0.32035723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.025268586,0.023930168,0.009054625,0.007911539,0.0022706466,0.0060211024,0.053145226,0.015776794,0.018177835,0.008682779,0.828763,0.0009977086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000497663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007806177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6381756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000536746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014724924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98997056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094346900","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-106458","title":"US direct-to-consumer medical service advertisements fail to provide adequate information on quality and cost of care","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Advertising; Business; Quality (philosophy); Service (business); Commission; Quarter (Canadian coin); Service quality; Scarcity; Marketing; Internet privacy; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.5602299360378633,"score_gpt":0.6115383656162602,"score_spread":0.051308429578396875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094346900","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4568738,0.0005989935,0.00040354743,0.53877443,0.0012286273,0.0006018743,0.0001269736,0.000026336951,0.0013654345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73109615,0.00065596256,0.000069621776,0.26780146,0.00034070332,0.000010926828,0.000008141591,0.00000779722,0.000009198962],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99382854,0.0014238377,0.0013258338,0.00017725215,0.0028570043,0.0003875473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99243253,0.002181512,0.00041317818,0.000112465335,0.0011150807,0.0037452104],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063861315,0.00019247929,0.00052552164,0.00010624824,0.00016361864,0.00001817168,0.0005413446,0.0019242285,0.0019113184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01623477,0.00015788664,0.00008435542,0.00036038703,0.00018334229,0.00021549688,0.00022124096,0.008624493,0.00010828831],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.016606176,0.0009547499,0.054051723,0.010151117,0.0011853739,0.00070605025,0.14751087,0.0012094142,0.0010592086,0.006481545,0.05131856,0.7087652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0051259394,0.0015040613,0.009582182,0.0010635852,0.00022720413,0.000056659494,0.004036419,0.0017636772,0.0052210763,0.00007327855,0.9710048,0.00034116025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011481607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012187144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9196862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009584788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019157762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99937147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3097868833","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-106894","title":"Emotional support animals are not like prosthetics: a response to Sara Kolmes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Function (biology); Human body; Psychology; Emotional support; Internet privacy; Social psychology; Computer science; Social support; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1839813684863966,"score_gpt":0.40333287098006315,"score_spread":0.21935150249366656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3097868833","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024038635,0.000029850578,0.0018006081,0.9911775,0.0036795526,0.00041168884,0.00024255559,0.000076847,0.0001775077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010176715,0.00040157465,0.00083094515,0.97902745,0.0077224104,0.000017532762,0.000013654681,0.00010384734,0.0017058917],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9753802,0.0027770658,0.0024910122,0.0008879641,0.01763103,0.0008327634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.981986,0.012363427,0.002187363,0.00060837186,0.0017588615,0.0010959989],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009955,0.0005707155,0.0011057653,0.0008080031,0.00038670874,0.0002499866,0.0027289714,0.0038307395,0.002834873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17445476,0.00048517252,0.00043225015,0.0010817648,0.0018656547,0.00017288224,0.0006689792,0.039190933,0.0005352699],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005622199,0.00016146814,0.000005321719,0.00041948914,0.00003574749,0.014551596,0.0011297449,0.0000013903253,0.0184325,0.0006824939,0.9637423,0.00027573315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008366458,0.0015754617,0.00008795486,0.0015445454,0.00006475197,0.0012443842,0.000062181636,0.000021589307,0.007464252,0.0030633567,0.9835832,0.00045166427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000028211136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004265745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16449977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002670532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008017993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3099289353","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-106676","title":"Is there room for privacy in medical crowdfunding?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Beneficiary; Internet privacy; Popularity; Inclusion (mineral); Business; Information privacy; Public relations; Personally identifiable information; Political science; Psychology; Computer security; Computer science; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.0912174445571097,"score_gpt":0.3496901688720093,"score_spread":0.25847272431489965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3099289353","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18118921,0.001095452,0.03306117,0.7752193,0.0016047211,0.00031307427,0.0000056142735,0.00007625531,0.0074351532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9305915,0.00026131026,0.00043837694,0.065017544,0.0035789171,0.0000044378044,0.0000026949747,0.00003583676,0.00006935527],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945475,0.000026000256,0.00096942915,0.00023511397,0.0038299733,0.00039200482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975957,0.0009597171,0.0006398083,0.0001332655,0.00051312195,0.00015836013],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055107186,0.00019534797,0.00046879114,0.00020280648,0.00009509027,0.0002410272,0.0012266374,0.00097168103,0.0011962326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048052806,0.00015705776,0.00023328786,0.00060155493,0.00017371243,0.00089496863,0.0003624366,0.0036695546,0.00008509981],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011362059,0.0010118658,0.082633756,0.0062855035,0.00026860496,0.0032732338,0.0041474216,0.000035935464,0.00016287106,0.3686405,0.4581715,0.07423261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030411228,0.0001418767,0.003934867,0.0022019497,0.00004362482,0.0000662962,0.0003479677,0.012306075,0.00009778346,0.027655436,0.9498223,0.00034070495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005846727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000072644194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74940234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058841222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088648574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108729998","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-106768","title":"Problems and development strategies for research ethics committees in China’s higher education institutions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lagging; China; Reputation; Research ethics; Ethics committee; Higher education; Political science; Engineering ethics; Public administration; Public relations; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.871481509397553,"score_gpt":0.6862750441626324,"score_spread":0.18520646523492057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108729998","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046561334,0.0018888282,0.0033332536,0.944677,0.00046014026,0.0004814267,0.0000019352278,0.000012434837,0.00258363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96281785,0.008748279,0.012658903,0.014408428,0.0009948089,0.000032383665,0.0000062776076,0.000019103172,0.00031395938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98972213,0.0007873724,0.001095411,0.0002313222,0.0078104204,0.00035334218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9274712,0.06141674,0.0004138133,0.00035178888,0.008277439,0.0020690123],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.061158307,0.00011071654,0.00037430166,0.00023644752,0.00027729274,0.000088924746,0.0004343314,0.002508948,0.00014162471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19655313,0.00008327551,0.000062040235,0.0003926363,0.0012386232,0.00015518573,0.00021305017,0.03660656,0.000006100185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055190787,0.0011755102,0.0043968875,0.008952043,0.00012635601,0.00011286681,0.05258845,0.000059884656,0.00022320893,0.91689295,0.0057623936,0.00915755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0056699123,0.002809111,0.04547216,0.01272483,0.000053761494,0.00016618433,0.013281742,0.00029661276,0.00017959916,0.30707422,0.6119751,0.0002967933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013302635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012378877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9302686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001837426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08974401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99878603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110938766","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-106927","title":"Considering sex robots for older adults with cognitive impairments","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto; University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Psychology; Robot; Duty; Human sexuality; Narrative; Cognition; Quality of life (healthcare); Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Psychotherapist; Psychiatry; Sociology","score_opus":0.0896405490381657,"score_gpt":0.41489036537497387,"score_spread":0.32524981633680816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110938766","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005279692,0.0007053134,0.005410945,0.98387873,0.003348799,0.0006179362,0.000072398325,0.00007967564,0.00060651265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00913637,0.00019989036,0.0009856061,0.980865,0.0071584773,0.000065409375,0.00008844273,0.00012211881,0.0013786582],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994355,0.00053479546,0.0010533195,0.00047002165,0.0029840812,0.00060273363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99282664,0.004517146,0.0010845236,0.00026754857,0.00095829944,0.0003458657],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021998729,0.0004033648,0.0010537035,0.0002521345,0.00011928134,0.000036575926,0.0007358726,0.006881212,0.0012127878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004026528,0.0003049053,0.00026561975,0.00015931421,0.00075587386,0.00005373746,0.00011795067,0.023227615,0.000030570493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005922426,0.00033663964,0.00068189116,0.00069623167,0.0010998178,0.028215293,0.015818074,1.6580117e-7,0.0000016097455,0.00030258743,0.9372037,0.015051732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01940567,0.005193429,0.0005390876,0.007136535,0.0016000378,0.012531093,0.015953334,0.000016917265,0.0000702872,0.0018841083,0.9346395,0.0010300031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006878496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000038639962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018813428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007554282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015848835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117972040","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-106654","title":"Applying futility in psychiatry: a concept whose time has come","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto; University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Connotation; Psychological intervention; Mental illness; Psychiatry; Intervention (counseling); Psychology; Quality of life (healthcare); Ontology; Medicine; Psychotherapist; Nursing; Mental health; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14583982923062566,"score_gpt":0.3627292280941017,"score_spread":0.21688939886347602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117972040","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066603236,0.00580717,0.00020914212,0.8997633,0.008621128,0.0004427126,0.00003857914,0.000043049364,0.01847172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8963382,0.00028346555,0.0003708348,0.09667744,0.006136364,0.0000061635733,0.0000059247923,0.000016321257,0.0001652554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967944,0.00027864758,0.00078717456,0.000115459436,0.0017839515,0.00024034143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984122,0.00041140246,0.00028424527,0.00008407683,0.00013508576,0.0006729999],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030851744,0.000111996545,0.00034064116,0.00005601032,0.00022316602,0.00007624254,0.00035610216,0.0003418985,0.0073856614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078093394,0.000085594904,0.000111795925,0.00006329875,0.00041986257,0.00012231663,0.00004318226,0.0038595272,0.00009740375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010536485,0.0010342996,0.005685617,0.0021376081,0.000112314745,0.00024115083,0.27634543,0.000009836222,0.0000072274147,0.35383403,0.33246663,0.02707219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021685816,0.000568437,0.00033165736,0.00067337713,0.000020849307,0.000036172114,0.007858813,0.0007078962,0.0000018865961,0.007153573,0.9803296,0.00014919412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013576339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064308627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.829735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031409996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018688509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132058775","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-107193","title":"Against vaccine nationalism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Health and Conflict Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Binghamton University; Carnegie Mellon University","keywords":"Population; Nationalism; Poverty; European union; Human rights; Political science; Economic growth; Medicine; Development economics; Business; Economics; Law; International trade; Environmental health","score_opus":0.23841606954129377,"score_gpt":0.5370109722722486,"score_spread":0.2985949027309548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132058775","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006871869,0.0054121073,0.00020645639,0.9802537,0.00834703,0.00015121812,0.000021824759,0.000017195209,0.0055217296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000029603461,0.019140491,0.00017457487,0.93143505,0.044038802,0.000012186137,0.00006803083,0.00003236858,0.005068892],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98727864,0.0018826282,0.0021080496,0.0001939299,0.007891789,0.00064496475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979688,0.0135495,0.0015713514,0.00025019515,0.004406057,0.0005349235],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013170695,0.0002455731,0.000993734,0.00021740848,0.0007336275,0.000011618807,0.000669971,0.009226788,0.0033763663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048685264,0.00017705813,0.00027733808,0.00022028171,0.000094590716,0.000054938253,0.00024904197,0.0748328,0.00013136021],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010751723,0.000021238337,0.000055780947,0.002013404,0.00014732832,0.00250048,0.010175901,1.6682974e-7,4.1111582e-7,0.0003835548,0.9835698,0.0011211863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010372272,0.000053812553,0.00017939296,0.0048648464,0.000059457925,0.000065129,0.0006425949,0.0000076868255,3.0419602e-7,0.00021726852,0.99272984,0.00014240915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000072893796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046801568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065606005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026933235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02820328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132525839","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-106690","title":"How individual ethical frameworks shape physician trainees’ experiences providing end-of-life care: a qualitative study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Family Medicine","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Thematic analysis; End-of-life care; Context (archaeology); Qualitative research; Psychology; Health care; Nursing; Experiential learning; Medical education; Medicine; Palliative care; Sociology; Pedagogy; Political science","score_opus":0.22755541042328947,"score_gpt":0.5159303400838924,"score_spread":0.2883749296606029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132525839","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9012624,0.009026988,0.0022889038,0.08620749,0.0006807669,0.00020995217,0.000016665865,0.000013750881,0.00029311425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98641956,0.0012355832,0.0038461282,0.0074965656,0.0009441547,0.000009815313,0.0000090608355,0.000020023466,0.000019108385],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899669,0.0016452639,0.0011063763,0.0002589591,0.0067121945,0.00031026665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884638,0.0070884526,0.00084107684,0.00023414506,0.00273083,0.00064165535],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006466859,0.00023930229,0.0012047414,0.0001730272,0.0000974179,0.000048227885,0.00044777198,0.0027475087,0.00017694187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0656989,0.00017680817,0.00036363926,0.00056573586,0.00092815433,0.00015867797,0.00014063832,0.014921792,7.9120144e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023363062,0.0007214377,0.0011743231,0.00061087386,0.00063620147,0.0006392664,0.98281544,0.0000018842761,0.0002630003,0.0016516759,0.0006568775,0.0105954055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002644112,0.0019460855,0.00035055366,0.0045965086,0.00030993376,0.00004756813,0.98157316,0.000057255136,0.002516162,0.0004498468,0.00534367,0.00016516229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003751917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006226625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085157186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000073186675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067758444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135588960","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107315","title":"Canadian perspective on ageism and selective lockdown: a response to Savulescu and Cameron","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Challenges","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Expansive; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Public policy; Psychology; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Medicine; Computer science; Disease","score_opus":0.11080585898439446,"score_gpt":0.510747608689106,"score_spread":0.3999417497047115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135588960","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3855364,0.0025922775,0.000050979914,0.60932475,0.00055332336,0.00015510873,0.000010317231,0.000005834427,0.0017710299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9687001,0.0028573864,0.00013782603,0.026998397,0.00077599526,0.0000055936002,3.2059168e-7,0.000014426266,0.00050992053],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940152,0.003527196,0.00050338526,0.00019505873,0.0013696242,0.00038949365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99161905,0.0044078035,0.0001753612,0.00012312757,0.0017439118,0.0019307169],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011239464,0.000114420334,0.00037089395,0.00019105556,0.0005259163,0.000012389649,0.000106986285,0.0012771892,0.00014049566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027450057,0.000088057124,0.000038398743,0.0001736015,0.0000823433,0.00004050301,0.000060731352,0.007534615,0.000015256389],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002801211,0.00020922325,0.005051364,0.0014332788,0.0003736627,0.0075939447,0.82663447,0.0000046429777,0.00034714365,0.06577266,0.063626625,0.026151791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033299238,0.0026583073,0.09656705,0.008932788,0.00005601999,0.0010370809,0.48306748,0.000039599927,0.000042828673,0.0059623388,0.397914,0.00039259138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08848857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5270106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58316374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009858746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021346455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.994755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139447385","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-106764","title":"Towards collective moral resilience: the potential of communities of practice during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"National Cancer Institute","keywords":"Psychological resilience; Resilience (materials science); Psychology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Health care; Sociology; Distress; Moral disengagement; Social psychology; Morality; Political science; Medicine; Law; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.17571738631089245,"score_gpt":0.5367515744442065,"score_spread":0.36103418813331406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139447385","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2488682,0.0042277942,0.0047106277,0.73238367,0.0017116509,0.00032712484,0.000020769288,0.000012519501,0.0077376454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9391207,0.01921828,0.0011230862,0.039765473,0.00047666463,0.0000057274615,9.3796683e-7,0.000012719725,0.00027639422],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9687583,0.023690294,0.0014375604,0.00011401794,0.0056980303,0.00030180204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.795219,0.19564408,0.0028190606,0.0005864359,0.005120328,0.0006111166],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.083329566,0.00012523658,0.00047282808,0.0000759842,0.0016961943,0.000016830145,0.0009045577,0.001340115,0.0005806707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4765932,0.00006853494,0.000111670575,0.00041970977,0.0036086533,0.00023607652,0.0006980326,0.03362335,0.00000144869],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041712387,0.0008962329,0.022952737,0.005935149,0.0011690209,0.0010705085,0.80916035,0.00043848832,0.0014212186,0.13452029,0.016156655,0.0021081318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041138865,0.00045356515,0.012872294,0.0016402913,0.0005833087,0.00335103,0.84502673,0.0005249522,0.00012774648,0.104508094,0.026619188,0.00017892945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010269725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00123133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6926182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022789056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025979767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3145166337","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-106959","title":"WHO guidance on ethics in outbreaks and the COVID-19 pandemic: a critical appraisal","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Outbreak; Isolation (microbiology); Relevance (law); Political science; Politics; Public relations; Disease; Engineering ethics; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Medicine; Virology; Law; Biology; Pathology","score_opus":0.19727132176242887,"score_gpt":0.5292050504695699,"score_spread":0.331933728707141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3145166337","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038215887,0.0033608377,0.008019518,0.94730437,0.0007496493,0.00011066287,0.000004380555,0.0000145049935,0.002220196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8971962,0.014269675,0.00044817087,0.08668717,0.0011015001,0.0000061651663,0.000001663305,0.000018178876,0.00027130978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99318886,0.0017693929,0.00071346253,0.0001869555,0.003842957,0.00029835463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9465745,0.050214767,0.00016835691,0.00029792596,0.0014240914,0.0013203712],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026076496,0.00012677947,0.0005166087,0.00014385965,0.00020499883,0.000061528706,0.00018966093,0.0013153864,0.000329051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36840382,0.00007256359,0.00016172473,0.00035292882,0.0015856996,0.00006625268,0.00014309469,0.01619959,0.000007244909],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00978571,0.0029954766,0.084102206,0.004851654,0.00065228966,0.025951326,0.046084076,0.00015158304,0.0010291423,0.7310737,0.049220156,0.044102687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.04435692,0.0027927565,0.018752087,0.0069712834,0.00038924115,0.060400996,0.008450959,0.008086788,0.00037456295,0.028338011,0.8204921,0.00059429725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023258806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005476656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8606172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013340989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075195613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152556357","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-107133","title":"Making a case for the inclusion of refractory and severe mental illness as a sole criterion for Canadians requesting medical assistance in dying (MAiD): a review","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Voluntariness; Mental illness; Legislation; Psychiatry; Inclusion (mineral); Assisted suicide; Legislature; Psychology; Medicine; Law; Social psychology; Mental health; Political science","score_opus":0.23152948901470644,"score_gpt":0.5641383774669065,"score_spread":0.3326088884522001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152556357","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000096526295,0.9727492,0.0012648148,0.022545194,0.002351196,0.00086155714,0.00006457955,0.000004925848,0.00006203877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00081034156,0.99372613,0.0005708106,0.004099295,0.00062886596,0.00006560044,0.000011782063,0.00004513506,0.000042024236],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919492,0.00216937,0.002500267,0.00036449087,0.0025780504,0.00043860698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9745343,0.022149287,0.0018097529,0.00032700907,0.0006599626,0.00051973714],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.033811983,0.00029444342,0.0020310846,0.00022234002,0.0005150715,0.000032706066,0.0006416658,0.002370704,0.000176405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0709758,0.00018358129,0.00046215512,0.00032609055,0.00027769327,0.0000548489,0.00031798656,0.0062534935,4.3497062e-7],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003665159,0.00006581719,5.335859e-7,0.043913294,0.000118062366,0.01822027,0.004839811,8.413703e-8,6.288524e-8,0.00024372604,0.0013758736,0.93118584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042520373,0.00013118295,4.0540192e-7,0.33264238,0.00022956474,0.06117876,0.0014380728,0.00004044379,1.1545919e-8,0.00014526762,0.60364264,0.00012603284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015488075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062778764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9310598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038814155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011187323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99892443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161506523","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107255","title":"Ethical decision making during a healthcare crisis: a resource allocation framework and tool","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Disaster Response and Management","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; University of Toronto; University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Accountability; Resource (disambiguation); Resource allocation; Health care rationing; Stakeholder; Inefficiency; Process (computing); Scarcity; Business; Knowledge management; Public relations; Management science; Process management; Computer science; Political science; Economics; Law; Management","score_opus":0.09536733993779849,"score_gpt":0.5126833439727734,"score_spread":0.4173160040349749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161506523","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3023618,0.0020818873,0.06942681,0.6244081,0.00096519035,0.00018300144,0.0000017724901,0.000026417529,0.0005449872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87881273,0.0026775894,0.011684751,0.10562286,0.0009926775,0.00000955347,0.0000012311843,0.000021879889,0.00017669924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929389,0.0024270776,0.0010181757,0.00019346848,0.003098184,0.0003242102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914035,0.0068008043,0.00042402008,0.00025834117,0.00074784976,0.0003654884],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0133925695,0.00011141465,0.0003240132,0.00012432886,0.000522166,0.000034727916,0.00024687345,0.0021350058,0.000363925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039955914,0.000089009314,0.00008496151,0.00023196782,0.00007062633,0.00008139652,0.0003134707,0.013485634,0.0000178928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004593917,0.0005620974,0.003947208,0.009931873,0.00046088878,0.0062855566,0.3211459,0.00005297392,0.0001538448,0.41402313,0.087087974,0.15175463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046841255,0.00046981956,0.018449143,0.061715756,0.00023032757,0.00080632465,0.20969363,0.00044992185,0.000029168024,0.116744764,0.58620626,0.00052076194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015140267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011437833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57645094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011989108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002233074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177743850","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107311","title":"Family experiences with non-therapeutic research on dying patients in the intensive care unit","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Blood Services; University of Ottawa; Western University; Carleton University; Ottawa Hospital; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario","funders":"Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program","keywords":"Informed consent; Donation; Thematic analysis; Organ donation; Medicine; Affect (linguistics); Family medicine; Next of kin; Intensive care unit; Protocol (science); Psychology; Qualitative research; Nursing; Alternative medicine; Transplantation; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.4985360182665989,"score_gpt":0.5707120539559449,"score_spread":0.07217603568934605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177743850","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9792849,0.003257565,0.00008982853,0.016029255,0.00019485435,0.00007505677,6.802863e-7,0.0000015381736,0.0010663443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871645,0.0030607958,0.00012494995,0.009459593,0.0001615372,0.000003394536,0.0000026008217,0.0000065638847,0.000016073715],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99424523,0.0005931621,0.00035364987,0.000101517304,0.0045225634,0.00018390173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99004436,0.0031199786,0.00013181458,0.00014873077,0.0064099547,0.0001451525],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030866659,0.00007973258,0.00029260686,0.00014349139,0.000068069035,0.000013980671,0.0002469862,0.00029405006,0.000042852436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010565194,0.0000405817,0.00005811627,0.00047792261,0.00040527197,0.00004141091,0.00003761,0.004066749,0.0000023738423],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008265452,0.00031835993,0.106440745,0.0003910903,0.00013150681,0.0027418837,0.8777235,0.0000102280455,0.00015087206,0.00028783636,0.0009735642,0.010003834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00209224,0.0019469173,0.017399313,0.008063545,0.000031767853,0.000055546523,0.9629458,0.000026218224,0.0013681243,0.000067650435,0.0059477645,0.000055105265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008209853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000950313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08904143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006007227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021075096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99823093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3179536112","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107262","title":"Research abuses against people of colour and other vulnerable groups in early psychedelic research","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Psychedelics and Drug Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Canada Research Chairs; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Mental health; Psychology; Agency (philosophy); Psychiatry; Covert; Informed consent; Ethnic group; Empirical research; Vulnerability (computing); Population; Criminology; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Sociology; Social science; Political science; Law; Environmental health","score_opus":0.31467285852682225,"score_gpt":0.5539317616227303,"score_spread":0.23925890309590803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3179536112","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92420983,0.009036884,0.00006538573,0.047727056,0.00070018275,0.0000892073,0.000004660017,0.0000041836256,0.018162586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99102086,0.0066178436,0.00020662027,0.0011322031,0.00044505755,0.000008676315,4.396419e-7,0.000020785827,0.000547494],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897387,0.0037768693,0.0008958549,0.00027561502,0.0047181267,0.0005948263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98846966,0.008180789,0.00018570754,0.00030586863,0.0025257082,0.00033226545],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.049925346,0.000115929506,0.0005072353,0.0005030464,0.00024135412,0.00004770526,0.00049866765,0.0009460449,0.0005546486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013308787,0.00009332509,0.000089585024,0.0011948365,0.0007794959,0.00006354952,0.00022960684,0.009856213,0.000023800965],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017135813,0.0053740274,0.22205836,0.0010452324,0.0010204656,0.0031876145,0.31426102,0.000031048658,0.0024599326,0.26331985,0.16219486,0.023334024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016651198,0.0035381564,0.3441087,0.0055594454,0.00006769129,0.0010542675,0.2661203,0.00028976868,0.0008671108,0.093826525,0.26710078,0.00081607467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010616583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046116156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16949332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058870995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014503396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3180783106","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107291","title":"Reflections of methodological and ethical challenges in conducting research during COVID-19 involving resettled refugee youth in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Migration, Health and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Impact; Western University; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Rigour; Reflexivity; Dignity; Distancing; Refugee; Research ethics; Pandemic; Negotiation; Sociology; Qualitative research; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Engineering ethics; Political science; Public relations; Criminology; Law; Social science; Medicine; Epistemology","score_opus":0.7900588271469575,"score_gpt":0.6224715585187514,"score_spread":0.16758726862820617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3180783106","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8288796,0.0090726055,0.00007172742,0.16108441,0.0004331178,0.000068618174,0.0000038598823,0.00000347581,0.00038259602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98680806,0.009857524,0.0010071554,0.0020721431,0.00022773881,0.0000038513485,0.0000015847722,0.000008260128,0.000013669814],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98421496,0.011291269,0.001257232,0.0002814802,0.0025031778,0.0004518685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97953486,0.01858959,0.00028838115,0.00019210775,0.0006854504,0.00070957874],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.055608675,0.00009439052,0.00049127353,0.00035636834,0.00017855321,0.000011246883,0.00023577256,0.0014660863,0.00039708347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15377197,0.00008050416,0.00004314911,0.0006056908,0.0003082267,0.00004024531,0.00010367746,0.015244843,4.902228e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025346782,0.0008339301,0.07887301,0.005688667,0.0002565954,0.012670558,0.6454382,0.00020387277,0.001950758,0.24187724,0.0018101629,0.007862308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010082008,0.00079248956,0.17124246,0.0030634205,0.0000586297,0.0029561247,0.76486206,0.00012774354,0.00075039343,0.041206114,0.0044202358,0.00043830494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30310738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9686946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66558725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005369728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016689537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3180878292","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107443","title":"Why we should not ‘just use age’ for COVID-19 vaccine prioritisation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"World Health Organization","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Population; Medicine; Demography; Vaccination; Gerontology; Environmental health; Virology; Sociology; Disease; Pathology; Outbreak","score_opus":0.26923908228846893,"score_gpt":0.46768036185104433,"score_spread":0.1984412795625754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3180878292","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014000447,0.0013392527,0.042657617,0.94004923,0.0015456292,0.00013007606,0.00000763563,0.000020946025,0.0002491421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45134127,0.07093471,0.008832056,0.4528326,0.012545088,0.000010420274,0.000019225246,0.000047130332,0.0034374793],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99528605,0.0005303947,0.00057176047,0.00014020111,0.0032148026,0.00025680204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99248534,0.0051721265,0.0002968515,0.00012150853,0.0011687308,0.00075542263],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0087650055,0.000090554335,0.00029102404,0.000078370715,0.00047460792,0.00019263817,0.0003479275,0.00091888895,0.0011875815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.104852594,0.00007932448,0.00019597421,0.00025174103,0.00003943346,0.00044079623,0.00005004011,0.0020018232,0.0000041640124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029697552,0.000380223,0.0057677184,0.00056114345,0.00015088478,0.0031742947,0.057098787,0.00004197302,0.00031189978,0.14552948,0.77063906,0.016047552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014740282,0.000106267325,0.0012944206,0.00022498371,0.00006847523,0.00007298252,0.0034345014,0.000033869706,0.00007979592,0.009517923,0.9835847,0.000108032866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038636618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013081206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48721665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020789809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007861228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184842396","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107529","title":"Defining the undefinable: the black box problem in healthcare artificial intelligence","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":209,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Black box; Health care; Point (geometry); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Data science; Law; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.2417210488442233,"score_gpt":0.4876561588576734,"score_spread":0.2459351100134501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184842396","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048691988,0.005791631,0.0043280474,0.93929994,0.0011751744,0.00018837804,8.703309e-7,0.000008790995,0.0005151867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96595806,0.006508011,0.00088271033,0.025572596,0.0009832331,0.000005738823,0.000003081053,0.000013136854,0.00007341583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949306,0.0007127251,0.0013095615,0.00016004784,0.0025327334,0.0003542824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926017,0.0046822964,0.00039421782,0.00031946215,0.0016653487,0.0003369807],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01257022,0.00011614203,0.0003082141,0.00008257343,0.0002512377,0.00005746324,0.00035114065,0.0006656033,0.00023979331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021456277,0.00006302082,0.00012610108,0.0007471575,0.0004783586,0.00007579212,0.00007197712,0.0069615142,0.00004721619],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032786917,0.0005410181,0.0062339967,0.0007914002,0.00006816821,0.0008797367,0.034084573,0.00037900897,0.00003456142,0.56581783,0.004445478,0.38639638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021332274,0.0018141316,0.004505638,0.007704768,0.00023233466,0.005259484,0.16883257,0.005601777,0.013420668,0.7411407,0.05084263,0.00043192608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011357878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032171034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9172661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018310898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011758252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99532944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191714851","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107493","title":"Social determinants of health and slippery slopes in assisted dying debates: lessons from Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Jurisdiction; Legislation; Law; Slippery slope; Assisted suicide; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.32720714935224054,"score_gpt":0.5204253375996943,"score_spread":0.1932181882474538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191714851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91380507,0.014331199,0.00017327837,0.07131903,0.00025030313,0.000028090411,0.000009729285,0.0000015823025,0.00008170166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833475,0.011392523,0.0010323691,0.004005838,0.00019606834,3.243502e-7,0.00000514078,0.0000069683197,0.000013288499],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970344,0.00033620908,0.00078991335,0.0000888433,0.0015978031,0.00015285025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970441,0.001709068,0.00044761781,0.00006242753,0.00047662496,0.00026017815],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020651002,0.00007877249,0.0006924858,0.00006143604,0.000043878612,0.000004388616,0.0000894136,0.00033357253,0.000040314982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010889688,0.00006184449,0.000060430786,0.00014496731,0.00014069,0.000034192646,0.00004389639,0.0014681002,8.408692e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042274213,0.00053696474,0.65801513,0.0028748037,0.00043665856,0.005070441,0.053770024,0.00000305744,0.001374406,0.00021363092,0.0053739664,0.2719082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014697324,0.0011159794,0.74037015,0.07195697,0.0004033131,0.0009283787,0.088892706,0.000623781,0.015060364,0.0011799602,0.06424212,0.0005289648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08897911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34833312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2713792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012536864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014579864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192943571","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107263","title":"Non-static framework for understanding adaptive designs: an ethical justification in paediatric trials","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical studies and practices","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"George & Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation; Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba; University of Manitoba","funders":"Research Manitoba","keywords":"Scrutiny; Clinical trial; Psychological intervention; Value (mathematics); Comprehension; Medicine; Clinical study design; Appeal; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Psychiatry; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.6460258876031516,"score_gpt":0.5694513930080444,"score_spread":0.07657449459510723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3192943571","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036007005,0.0024403648,0.6834953,0.3092236,0.0008235718,0.0002631122,0.0000042799034,0.0000071083646,0.00014198448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9127234,0.015213317,0.049646858,0.02037469,0.0019932517,0.000011849917,0.000005681277,0.000019346737,0.000011595322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944785,0.0014283708,0.0012048157,0.00018278527,0.0024363361,0.00026917493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93748593,0.05955452,0.0008759952,0.00017560426,0.0011025531,0.00080538023],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.038151383,0.00012635716,0.00077538023,0.000121308294,0.00013378792,0.000041549458,0.00015609653,0.00162649,0.00025654715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19765681,0.00009098035,0.00021288596,0.0004241695,0.00016996036,0.00013406677,0.000041135925,0.009120489,0.000002858587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.016419047,0.004097417,0.0017004823,0.0042207874,0.0020085257,0.0047308723,0.031560875,0.00031196288,0.0014773236,0.8154207,0.014235579,0.10381643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.019362155,0.0051160315,0.0019761752,0.0066032903,0.003894785,0.0011368775,0.05565023,0.042207062,0.0013533281,0.83213425,0.02991428,0.00065155217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000086408245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003128254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9091227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025749436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029475677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194865074","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107647","title":"Flawed reasoning on two dilemmas: a commentary on Baron and Dierckxsens (2021)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Argument (complex analysis); Psychological intervention; Psychology; Informed consent; Epistemology; Psychotherapist; Psychoanalysis; Psychiatry; Medicine; Law; Philosophy; Alternative medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.07038857590960447,"score_gpt":0.41998926841437717,"score_spread":0.3496006925047727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194865074","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017053545,0.0054860967,0.000061042076,0.9876952,0.0031171541,0.00019783175,0.000028575556,0.000015272459,0.0016934526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0042576827,0.032218255,0.00091366045,0.9176788,0.044239387,0.0000036302167,0.00013276916,0.00007618646,0.0004796575],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874904,0.0015044977,0.0013733535,0.00047241963,0.008564748,0.0005945444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869473,0.009572786,0.00076347,0.0005431362,0.0011533578,0.0010199394],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010490605,0.00046755912,0.0014433874,0.00034457858,0.00023689496,0.000081635415,0.00039411944,0.0063583935,0.00083293393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020149138,0.00035027644,0.00038344227,0.00023800347,0.0004386459,0.00005336581,0.00018525017,0.076534286,0.000014082625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019828108,0.00013509946,0.0001565871,0.0018014043,0.0002669424,0.034706626,0.0020138982,0.0000013131023,0.0000021452092,0.00065337605,0.95297426,0.007090048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023948625,0.0020351026,0.000042618474,0.015581396,0.00042395733,0.001469914,0.0003426404,0.0000968806,0.000012518315,0.0005611846,0.9767501,0.00028885508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042433248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007566727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07017589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036697427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004191119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195556311","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107793","title":"MAID’s slippery slope: a commentary on Downie and Schuklenk","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Slippery slope; Legislation; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Legislature; Right to die; Political science; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.2108061032770161,"score_gpt":0.4658342760595069,"score_spread":0.2550281727824908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195556311","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020718183,0.017590137,0.00012748029,0.97738254,0.0014465047,0.00009279279,0.000027244334,0.000008333413,0.0012531604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00045999596,0.07186866,0.0012248917,0.9151675,0.010785866,0.0000015937179,0.00008020061,0.000033147368,0.0003781402],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99274564,0.00049010717,0.0009766342,0.00022850893,0.0052578268,0.00030128498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937875,0.0040416024,0.00061338185,0.0002837408,0.000851221,0.00042249841],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033015292,0.00029751143,0.0012606521,0.00025793497,0.000059227863,0.00002419624,0.0003121058,0.0035279738,0.0009111273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00899682,0.00020846151,0.00035315516,0.00014870148,0.00048482462,0.000055540342,0.00013851126,0.022137228,0.000008369712],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013851855,0.00011361316,0.0006398398,0.0016964148,0.0005430564,0.013329249,0.0011973025,2.0959796e-7,0.000016727428,0.000039770966,0.97763723,0.00464808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002032577,0.00083106424,0.00014235257,0.027077364,0.00043726465,0.000979512,0.0005808769,0.0000070033525,0.0001507001,0.00019207399,0.9673987,0.00017052925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000057489313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014551502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062215023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001323489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021479295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99935085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196906615","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2020-107147","title":"Strategic and principled approach to the ethical challenges of epilepsy monitoring unit triage","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Epilepsy research and treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"NeuroDevNet; University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia; Canada Research Chairs; National Institute of Mental Health; American Academy of Neurology","keywords":"Triage; Epilepsy; Computer science; Resource (disambiguation); Consolidation (business); Risk analysis (engineering); Component (thermodynamics); Business; Medicine; Process management; Medical emergency; Psychiatry; Accounting","score_opus":0.2514419465138798,"score_gpt":0.4400906397486024,"score_spread":0.1886486932347226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196906615","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6069962,0.013427956,0.0004950395,0.37271968,0.0003216523,0.0002511666,0.0000031296368,0.00000889413,0.0057763425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97166365,0.024752751,0.0021066964,0.0006796187,0.0007021789,0.0000048297243,0.0000012241518,0.000010510497,0.00007851285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99468213,0.00074492,0.00055950513,0.00015073734,0.00362569,0.0002370042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995392,0.0024672532,0.0001604261,0.00024454392,0.0009262864,0.00080945535],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0097925505,0.00011308205,0.00047546512,0.00008508099,0.00008072977,0.000020629797,0.00020911316,0.00084202015,0.00006046017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012437889,0.00006164243,0.00012788207,0.00020716178,0.00022953119,0.000026582342,0.00012666393,0.0066233086,0.0000026894104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007401351,0.011858611,0.076453865,0.010901069,0.006308199,0.018482927,0.055834565,0.0001429939,0.0049037393,0.66551876,0.0016223497,0.14057158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.068979,0.026054084,0.5782617,0.024330525,0.0029939471,0.02814569,0.13863435,0.0028661934,0.026625507,0.041276272,0.060424007,0.0014087277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001302967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019635427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6242425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037513793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198108503","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107794","title":"Eligibility for assisted dying: not protection for vulnerable people, but protection for people when they are vulnerable","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Medicine; Psychology; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.29979281761812604,"score_gpt":0.4590982115531855,"score_spread":0.15930539393505944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198108503","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002348652,0.0011625256,0.27745846,0.713012,0.0022655826,0.003405257,0.00025919333,0.00003813753,0.000050215604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041262813,0.010179437,0.11950109,0.7118081,0.088948004,0.008674791,0.0027144295,0.0008616989,0.016049653],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928167,0.00085706555,0.0017060781,0.0005644334,0.0034551418,0.000600582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98308563,0.0071467254,0.0021559226,0.00045979692,0.0068272646,0.00032467738],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014206312,0.00046179397,0.0020666448,0.00030342574,0.0004975379,0.00007577096,0.00039216806,0.0048457137,0.00012621855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09349517,0.00035836198,0.001089259,0.00022376455,0.00012640656,0.00016124417,0.00006154924,0.013536944,0.0000011632634],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0055004675,0.00081769965,0.00039053135,0.056061227,0.0019610059,0.00014928202,0.008390191,0.000061576626,0.00313242,0.00008655716,0.9104798,0.012969279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0074728355,0.0028104668,0.0001599209,0.014572781,0.0013729237,0.00037279236,0.0020110998,0.002482465,0.0077629276,0.0040424084,0.9564546,0.0004847866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005934388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012836981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15795739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050761254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044932347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199677529","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107795","title":"Eligibility and access to voluntary assisted dying: a view from Victoria, Australia","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Data science; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.42274022787231547,"score_gpt":0.5477861803000733,"score_spread":0.12504595242775784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199677529","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04104884,0.010729241,0.0007178384,0.9441845,0.0029357863,0.00017517454,0.000067358196,0.00001132998,0.00012995704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0040588374,0.02268211,0.0050384155,0.94958097,0.01797986,0.0000049178943,0.00021113695,0.000050784605,0.00039296513],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920223,0.0006170642,0.0014936797,0.0003687876,0.005183242,0.00031495353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99228716,0.003947526,0.0008051691,0.00040775447,0.0018414188,0.0007109862],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037561,0.00032828978,0.0017036446,0.00019677979,0.000046916568,0.000066347086,0.0005856819,0.003900093,0.0013692253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02130119,0.00024616218,0.00034108327,0.00029055472,0.00028757885,0.000110139306,0.0002714304,0.015147287,0.0000078849125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016576248,0.00010937512,0.014727507,0.0026128928,0.00083641603,0.007574673,0.002292095,2.2335054e-7,0.00010431763,0.000005832192,0.9686635,0.002907415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012099949,0.0002910227,0.011062117,0.02338482,0.0008017777,0.00025491483,0.00015184139,0.0000046560003,0.00021774648,0.0003066772,0.96209997,0.00021446634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011466753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022999426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019874467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031024884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200822225","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107837","title":"Taking the long view on slippery slope objections","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Slippery slope; Worry; Argument (complex analysis); Social psychology; Law; Health care; Psychology; Law and economics; Sociology; Medicine; Psychiatry; Political science","score_opus":0.14245881364366764,"score_gpt":0.44639347213504316,"score_spread":0.3039346584913755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200822225","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001276544,0.022670882,0.00034865152,0.9619735,0.007353247,0.00018622533,0.000007597877,0.000019418601,0.0073128343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005830291,0.05707222,0.00022624202,0.8813638,0.05377622,0.000004915302,0.000030854342,0.000060913528,0.001634549],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98536897,0.0015593031,0.0015075783,0.00031457283,0.010733123,0.0005164508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842712,0.010571649,0.0012971569,0.00066746597,0.0026529562,0.00053954596],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015914671,0.00034732936,0.001105435,0.00026625284,0.00040345048,0.000107650696,0.0007535904,0.008751786,0.003039755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053091835,0.00020106447,0.00069208286,0.0005147151,0.0004593393,0.00005573139,0.00015916138,0.111407965,0.00003998814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003117087,0.00009928393,0.00010218064,0.0032274476,0.0003254655,0.025068983,0.0023633041,0.0000030358358,5.65569e-7,0.00080804597,0.9477093,0.02026118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005112632,0.00046463855,0.00025449554,0.010304098,0.000471343,0.0053121326,0.00033550948,0.000016597118,0.0000045162915,0.0003235759,0.9818199,0.00018189315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002267024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013506423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10265618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029369266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015491462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204408447","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107720","title":"Heritable human genome editing is ‘currently not permitted’, but it is no longer ‘prohibited’: so says the ISSCR","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"CRISPR and Genetic Engineering","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Law; Research ethics; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.03088127317579206,"score_gpt":0.37243364614603036,"score_spread":0.3415523729702383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204408447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7070977,0.026985928,0.023431852,0.23245496,0.004834098,0.00025202872,0.0000989735,0.000027026343,0.004817397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94587445,0.0059526945,0.0010750996,0.03456636,0.008619006,0.0000034644063,0.000037777347,0.00005542486,0.0038157057],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717987,0.00012660689,0.0005622091,0.00023133181,0.0015691713,0.00033082496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830383,0.00011970523,0.00018911516,0.0003108819,0.0007983573,0.0002781038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023287863,0.00017568596,0.00024844473,0.000033657147,0.00025632035,0.00008981479,0.0004627143,0.000731428,0.0009110736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020835917,0.00013165158,0.00023935671,0.000104190774,0.00018599168,0.000006494947,0.00023969932,0.0022379726,0.000020394164],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041960855,0.00020205471,0.00025908832,0.00034883816,0.00036263542,0.0003427326,0.0045996225,0.00014118683,0.86978024,0.00012459431,0.120142914,0.003654136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091634697,0.00027042752,0.0005447142,0.0003189144,0.000099092606,0.00076145714,0.0018752925,0.00040914505,0.17487305,0.00008338431,0.81955147,0.000296725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000150155765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030074223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69940853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020450329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008156539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213974828","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107765","title":"Informed consent in pragmatic trials: results from a survey of trials published 2014–2019","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"National Institute on Aging; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Waiver; Informed consent; Research ethics; Family medicine; Clinical trial; Medicine; Institutional review board; MEDLINE; Logistic regression; Psychology; Alternative medicine; Law; Political science; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.7879328139554614,"score_gpt":0.6646176551062494,"score_spread":0.12331515884921207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213974828","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24706435,0.007323552,0.0016074568,0.7330465,0.0050313547,0.0011515204,0.0006598489,0.00002312775,0.00409234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7709923,0.19894648,0.011466271,0.013891355,0.0025821887,0.000011613566,0.00045731562,0.00006956404,0.0015829238],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8668412,0.05867051,0.02971965,0.00092307304,0.04267473,0.0011708232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.0059189107,0.97579795,0.004831462,0.0009004762,0.011282021,0.0012691803],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.59418297,0.00020580104,0.003670254,0.00042207877,0.00004117194,0.00008941571,0.00078105775,0.004252649,0.0022445233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9969739,0.00013544224,0.00064045924,0.0007976705,0.0008384712,0.00018370006,0.00032422986,0.022359733,0.000026643671],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.08848073,0.011036984,0.052732058,0.015909422,0.0069303685,0.01289295,0.024707004,0.000075079224,0.003357851,0.020890528,0.74100566,0.021981386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.23728076,0.0065665734,0.37094954,0.12641779,0.0020062532,0.0011865251,0.0063675167,0.00091299484,0.006675923,0.21431953,0.02614616,0.0011704318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053769047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06592784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91712743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021110372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13822101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99866754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206125651","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107958","title":"Reconsenting paediatric research participants for use of identifying data","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Genome Alberta","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Expansive; Informed consent; Research ethics; Legislation; Political science; Law; Public relations; Medicine; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering; Alternative medicine; Social science","score_opus":0.8331691521865323,"score_gpt":0.6298253878632654,"score_spread":0.20334376432326695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206125651","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6412066,0.02165315,0.0062871156,0.32240736,0.006748681,0.0011288536,0.00028020114,0.00003248167,0.00025551728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771225,0.008041936,0.009474386,0.0025814592,0.0025022666,0.000010433296,0.000032633376,0.000030472505,0.00020393448],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98747456,0.0016743761,0.0015145236,0.00025287768,0.008543744,0.00053989404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9655008,0.028165752,0.00092776975,0.00082080776,0.0036668582,0.0009180583],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.094789945,0.00009223424,0.0005027034,0.00043390653,0.00043737696,0.00003593479,0.0008543569,0.0005809596,0.0004523361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16324258,0.00007798044,0.00014874889,0.0007119191,0.00027586528,0.00018208094,0.0009115709,0.012472957,0.0000014107346],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0056680655,0.0049617426,0.1533077,0.032212168,0.00176262,0.0070704515,0.072992295,0.0002871021,0.00086285995,0.027971035,0.46436587,0.22853807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006493459,0.0036664444,0.002883047,0.0022494285,0.0008462405,0.0016285056,0.016813643,0.020014944,0.0001937143,0.008278701,0.9365653,0.0003665944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037148345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009074251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47219938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012659501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0087867435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206985409","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-108099","title":"Prioritisation for therapies based on a disorder’s severity: ethics and practicality","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Pharmaceutical studies and practices","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Bulletin of Medical History","funders":"","keywords":"Data science; Psychology; Medicine; Psychiatry; Computer science","score_opus":0.21064164678735747,"score_gpt":0.4891575810156283,"score_spread":0.2785159342282708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206985409","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018562286,0.0031602276,0.0029151647,0.99177504,0.0011074882,0.00040286224,0.00004747839,0.00001542143,0.00039068787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0023379447,0.022760607,0.001652124,0.96867454,0.0043658405,0.000023111956,0.000041510313,0.000036034387,0.000108266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902296,0.001967636,0.000771728,0.00026498863,0.0064517534,0.00031431104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9466865,0.051161267,0.000829256,0.00019302104,0.0008193966,0.00031057055],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.022472724,0.00025587776,0.0007870163,0.00011297446,0.0005194994,0.000068739224,0.00023299022,0.0032024053,0.001249007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10172206,0.00018538709,0.00027912305,0.00012280815,0.00045166726,0.00010847391,0.000104316096,0.053173725,0.0000013705271],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0039762016,0.0007681774,0.00039538476,0.0073251175,0.0010755669,0.0022774208,0.004255839,0.0000030754659,0.000004900882,0.000704436,0.9442084,0.035005517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025633741,0.0019543848,0.00019310172,0.00078959664,0.00072521926,0.00043872354,0.00049077993,0.0010076792,0.0000025987895,0.0019407335,0.9897141,0.00017970802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000058752612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021921065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07924934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016165635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035908478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210502428","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107820","title":"Youth should decide: the principle of subsidiarity in paediatric transgender healthcare","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiarity; nobody; Decision maker; Health care; Transgender; Identity (music); Public relations; Psychology; Law; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Management science; Business; Computer security; Economics; European union","score_opus":0.21798432269168427,"score_gpt":0.4677768333604237,"score_spread":0.24979251066873942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210502428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6005633,0.0188228,0.00032565,0.37809166,0.0015280979,0.000350593,0.000042111275,0.000011739935,0.00026407788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977872,0.008982902,0.00024247501,0.011881601,0.0009598517,0.0000059929876,0.000007114537,0.00001986349,0.00002815849],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885654,0.0016575861,0.00156718,0.00018851069,0.007638466,0.00038288478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944081,0.0031497038,0.00058158126,0.0003487027,0.00091296784,0.00059899536],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.031666975,0.00015058243,0.0006388486,0.0002895694,0.00022205609,0.0000091681295,0.0006386719,0.00097032683,0.0004310097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009660841,0.00009969812,0.00028062813,0.0009463723,0.0002693158,0.00005276589,0.00017962715,0.021261454,0.0000010038309],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035293156,0.0041994043,0.47393158,0.010165982,0.0005152213,0.0061118957,0.3214504,0.0009882115,0.000066266104,0.15011822,0.004101461,0.02482202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03324502,0.015246941,0.16582273,0.0033114895,0.0020155343,0.0072656753,0.1758669,0.0031805835,0.00054924114,0.036073633,0.55567354,0.0017487294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009005596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057754247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5515721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002518917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009967801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224301868","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2022-108129","title":"Imagination and idealism in the medical sciences of an ageing world","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Birth, Development, and Health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Idealism; Ageing; Disease; Paradigm shift; Population ageing; Medicine; Control (management); Population; Gerontology; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Pathology; Computer science; Internal medicine; Environmental health","score_opus":0.1041411083358924,"score_gpt":0.4432536114118971,"score_spread":0.3391125030760047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224301868","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58253336,0.0011236442,0.00018649326,0.41423872,0.00032944613,0.000075610784,7.594655e-7,0.000003350982,0.0015086014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.966465,0.012272845,0.0007400459,0.020278048,0.0002333559,0.0000014940213,0.0000011279653,0.0000034483714,0.000004624594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99261326,0.0005885431,0.00055105507,0.000085826345,0.00601573,0.00014555965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982697,0.0010007004,0.00025940104,0.00006719864,0.00013095734,0.0002720935],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035532564,0.000052993673,0.00022300935,0.0002632262,0.00019278881,0.0000120316145,0.0003104768,0.00014600791,0.00035016797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049352823,0.00003207916,0.000030873543,0.0004317935,0.00049450406,0.00006522554,0.00007201303,0.0039739492,2.0659591e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024502937,0.0008488079,0.028233327,0.0008846613,0.000053200543,0.0055524246,0.053479835,0.000012152983,0.00012967378,0.80807084,0.004354177,0.09813586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012437807,0.0046282993,0.4994896,0.0036807973,0.00015102171,0.017867016,0.03496664,0.008840891,0.00014417656,0.38606083,0.03136653,0.00036640113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019279125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006592747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47125626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052673422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046618413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246900162","doi":"10.1136/jme.2011.044461","title":"Authors' response","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Dental Education, Practice, Research","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Alberta; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Data science","score_opus":0.44774279520021165,"score_gpt":0.6389092338265984,"score_spread":0.19116643862638671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246900162","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63677937,0.00078677863,0.0016044165,0.32193938,0.009211261,0.00029074095,0.0000036994347,0.000035744422,0.029348608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9515463,0.0027279821,0.0027054395,0.025038054,0.0028391078,0.00001615655,0.0000015890078,0.000048744594,0.015076622],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879068,0.0059238635,0.00091923465,0.0001036852,0.004771613,0.00037478088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879342,0.0085427435,0.0006314564,0.00025260972,0.0016521862,0.0009868193],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08568988,0.0000839692,0.00021932744,0.00021863311,0.00043306864,0.000009542308,0.00067952025,0.0014062611,0.016789269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1806028,0.00006145255,0.00008604166,0.0002625377,0.00026418292,0.00025113413,0.0001657871,0.015641825,0.0009358578],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014629446,0.002425293,0.19869855,0.001129708,0.000323529,0.002039319,0.44549665,4.802951e-7,0.00060933956,0.055504475,0.24881078,0.030332439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016829554,0.00051745964,0.3047548,0.00089010794,0.000046981353,0.000352745,0.03240333,0.00003197067,0.00009147788,0.010089507,0.6489949,0.00014371806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027389955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004323053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4130933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022222726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017605394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249253313","doi":"10.1136/jme.2010.040147","title":"Respecting frailty: Table 1","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Sciences Centre; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Psychology; Medicine; Gerontology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.29525347799540397,"score_gpt":0.534558246062917,"score_spread":0.23930476806751305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249253313","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8758781,0.0032728144,0.0025998154,0.09869267,0.0027197858,0.000074795535,0.000003009155,0.000021814418,0.016737223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9662313,0.0044807694,0.018328559,0.0062711444,0.0039554504,6.924797e-7,0.0000017908302,0.000022492031,0.00070784154],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964319,0.00007662404,0.0005330813,0.00007536436,0.0027243108,0.00015872373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961366,0.0019389441,0.0003362286,0.00014731559,0.0010379025,0.0004030186],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005650948,0.00007815628,0.00037500277,0.00010080724,0.000046069505,0.000008655909,0.00020081238,0.00075489806,0.0009666403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05533834,0.000053972366,0.00012253526,0.00017221594,0.00022025486,0.000063455955,0.00004233664,0.006462769,0.000009967362],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002683761,0.002571272,0.2678131,0.003914893,0.0020947077,0.009660328,0.07389522,0.000024252146,0.1616917,0.07598899,0.20869929,0.19096251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026168136,0.00062996254,0.0025498245,0.004144948,0.0001535234,0.00090445724,0.0022487994,0.0001795129,0.01773306,0.00285302,0.9658637,0.00012236802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007082416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000873449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7571644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022343846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021062947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253763944","doi":"10.1136/jme.2003.007609","title":"Unheard heroes","year":2004,"lang":"ja","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; BC Innovation Council; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Disease; Etiology; Scleroderma (fungus); Referral; Dermatology; Pediatrics; Internal medicine; Pathology; Family medicine","score_opus":0.07405481425577766,"score_gpt":0.3681435430845318,"score_spread":0.29408872882875414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253763944","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044630524,0.09463853,0.0003292973,0.88544995,0.013710754,0.00027309972,0.000025201687,0.000028626666,0.0010814678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041373663,0.22636157,0.0002768395,0.6722468,0.056739636,0.000004146673,0.000040513765,0.00015114732,0.002805662],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9744048,0.001323379,0.0034071922,0.00044938707,0.01955101,0.0008641912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877227,0.0044705137,0.0025076382,0.00062253163,0.0025109705,0.002165661],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013301111,0.0006914209,0.0023768374,0.00052594626,0.00022067454,0.0001170365,0.0013024076,0.017823653,0.0064981664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03223774,0.0004451202,0.001618882,0.0004296061,0.0011176588,0.00011934864,0.00018213732,0.051955104,0.0005334483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003578504,0.00074833696,0.00027722478,0.006318201,0.002792162,0.024232892,0.0040051215,0.000027717315,0.00010248631,0.00037772392,0.9542625,0.0064978115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010012402,0.0016495708,0.00056650036,0.22340503,0.004003631,0.010903346,0.0025202248,0.00003420816,0.00010074166,0.0008842546,0.74527067,0.00064941973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001839116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000098749915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21708684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000695842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026771266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281628194","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2022-108400","title":"Orphans cannot be after-birth aborted: a response to Bobier","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Analogy; Aborted Fetus; Value (mathematics); Fetus; Psychology; Pregnancy; Medicine; Obstetrics; Philosophy; Biology; Epistemology; Mathematics; Genetics; Statistics","score_opus":0.06723787333256065,"score_gpt":0.4256822397972119,"score_spread":0.3584443664646513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281628194","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049895514,0.004608278,0.00015645137,0.9840931,0.004904683,0.00040359257,0.00024133435,0.00003608661,0.00056689145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0055416366,0.005644582,0.0008909464,0.95694435,0.023020465,0.000038146914,0.000056075594,0.00013226605,0.0077315206],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9760657,0.0027921456,0.0021309732,0.0005296374,0.017568449,0.00091307086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98537844,0.008137962,0.0009250786,0.0008558741,0.0027162766,0.0019863439],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.030827362,0.00052337925,0.0015987927,0.0009698949,0.0002417534,0.00007019492,0.0011328775,0.008774825,0.012611147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05677028,0.00041880473,0.00062782783,0.0008954705,0.00037422677,0.000077524375,0.00040673406,0.09539598,0.00004258388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033954112,0.00011809934,0.00010700362,0.0017617686,0.00022286463,0.08041163,0.008427684,0.000001888336,0.0000042230595,0.0000552769,0.9046214,0.0008727502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014168563,0.0032264306,0.0001860627,0.0017717318,0.0003757928,0.0037060408,0.0005542337,0.0000079315805,0.0000037800648,0.00018038791,0.98819983,0.0003709227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076474354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022967634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08662116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090037956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034460284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282978969","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2022-108163","title":"Repairing moral injury takes a team: what clinicians can learn from combat veterans","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Columbia College","funders":"McDonald Agape Foundation","keywords":"Moral injury; Psychology; Computer security; Computer science; Medicine; Medical emergency; Engineering ethics; Data science; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.22460414437142773,"score_gpt":0.48779243620296214,"score_spread":0.2631882918315344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4282978969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83678657,0.0063455375,0.00041402533,0.14596188,0.006115303,0.00022674045,0.00007966317,0.00005847499,0.004011784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885402,0.0011986839,0.00028309767,0.008767568,0.0007102115,0.000019072802,0.000012011814,0.000044005657,0.00042517664],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896829,0.0027047277,0.0011447681,0.00027242707,0.0056852424,0.0005099031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99403805,0.0042417315,0.00049530977,0.00044716187,0.00025896882,0.0005187666],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010386726,0.00017479106,0.0005336418,0.00023133616,0.00033536236,0.00011244225,0.001350123,0.0006258268,0.012830106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057803337,0.0001558044,0.0002849941,0.00028437917,0.0004172008,0.00016580029,0.00025149639,0.012453827,0.000044396584],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028817996,0.0038456647,0.035136737,0.00023974695,0.002047736,0.0065325615,0.28304696,0.00017912078,0.00017024789,0.008377486,0.15382256,0.5037194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017387738,0.009311591,0.046343938,0.0035712807,0.00048959715,0.0027773562,0.5146311,0.0026850875,0.000120322715,0.029115766,0.3721057,0.0014605671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002850554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008803365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5022588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015684827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015368937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9898245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283158046","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2022-108204","title":"Parent-initiated posthumous-assisted reproduction revisited in light of the interest in genetic origins","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Bioethics; Identity (music); Sperm donation; Anonymity; Genealogy; Certainty; Donation; Reproduction; Sociology; Epistemology; Biology; Law; Genetics; History; Philosophy; Political science; Sperm; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.17721480299869993,"score_gpt":0.4097008340618875,"score_spread":0.23248603106318758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283158046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8470273,0.0021138985,0.000012062696,0.14990368,0.0005943725,0.00020891502,0.0000017606466,0.0000121366975,0.0001258463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99683726,0.0016731858,0.00015513784,0.0011222844,0.0001682908,0.0000061843893,0.0000018739007,0.000009355403,0.000026409813],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963077,0.00070027105,0.0010474032,0.0002039188,0.001552104,0.0001886145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814755,0.0002971766,0.0005974387,0.00044251618,0.00040693395,0.00010836078],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006934033,0.00009125876,0.00040648074,0.00037940734,0.00006754613,0.000004103848,0.00035656986,0.00032086138,0.00014380898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021975921,0.00005828339,0.0000965282,0.0010103495,0.00019154687,0.00003536706,0.0001733431,0.005982366,8.586514e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006926949,0.0072292746,0.7742315,0.0043060877,0.0003761229,0.005609596,0.015300521,0.00019512737,0.022678724,0.019828722,0.009224072,0.13409328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005468683,0.0028224408,0.8963717,0.0035496682,0.00011014552,0.0058853193,0.0050505335,0.00014500238,0.0041202884,0.0044668093,0.07181744,0.0001919661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012845115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014588959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14980996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000341616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017969816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283206599","doi":"10.1136/medethics-2021-107953","title":"Ethics of non-therapeutic research on imminently dying patients in the intensive care unit","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Research ethics; Relation (database); Scope (computer science); Medicine; Informed consent; Psychology; Alternative medicine; Computer science; Engineering; Pathology","score_opus":0.48789970388256687,"score_gpt":0.5770706643961843,"score_spread":0.08917096051361739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283206599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9342472,0.0025463863,0.0000469016,0.0616772,0.00044993917,0.00018409881,0.0000069194652,0.0000020769792,0.00083925587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98725075,0.0032705294,0.00006468261,0.009214134,0.00015522842,0.000004021968,0.000007539425,0.000011618684,0.000021484711],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98922473,0.0018330171,0.00069472176,0.000108704604,0.00791677,0.00022204283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826671,0.00999855,0.00038004233,0.00023180801,0.006567357,0.00015512819],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014563103,0.00009792741,0.00041753353,0.00036827917,0.00012495548,0.0000053329395,0.0005079643,0.00044463316,0.000090427944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029504245,0.000062050596,0.000124464,0.0006199352,0.00042016865,0.000025492936,0.00014284856,0.014819525,0.0000012220588],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028719222,0.0012216114,0.18767546,0.0021035643,0.00039368935,0.0012365121,0.78619224,0.00018888348,0.00061978423,0.0021265096,0.0026078005,0.012762049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0089265015,0.011222357,0.037932277,0.012740281,0.00020456435,0.00011688569,0.8732123,0.00042674295,0.0022369963,0.0013598531,0.051410962,0.00021032456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029474567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007660054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14974318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001565795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002405911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98745334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292385245","doi":"10.1136/jme-2021-108087","title":"Prescribing safe supply: ethical considerations for clinicians","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Opioid Use Disorder Treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Health Services; The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Seriousness; Harm reduction; Harm; Medicine; Pandemic; Business; Medical emergency; Internet privacy; Intensive care medicine; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Psychiatry; Public relations; Risk analysis (engineering); Nursing; Public health; Psychology; Political science; Law; Social psychology; Pathology","score_opus":0.11615158781933976,"score_gpt":0.42621787391173827,"score_spread":0.3100662860923985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292385245","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03825116,0.001424815,0.0055306186,0.9515554,0.0019279391,0.0005692921,0.000056065677,0.000028339324,0.0006564178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92532176,0.0009906685,0.011233521,0.061277818,0.0008448055,0.00004774789,0.000019939489,0.000031254553,0.00023249],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944367,0.0004591283,0.0009244692,0.00015703173,0.0037750783,0.00024764013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905951,0.007653981,0.00033740196,0.0002082049,0.00073097943,0.00047435542],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008428625,0.0001217368,0.00045921313,0.00013216307,0.0004160911,0.000021755708,0.00017416886,0.0007862941,0.0025686217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034057554,0.00009887098,0.0003226976,0.00011819468,0.00017331206,0.000038589467,0.00010820402,0.009222902,0.0000055665764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003505591,0.007984777,0.0122665875,0.0016200114,0.0025117071,0.005379613,0.06060428,0.0011158237,0.00082076114,0.2143383,0.6706687,0.019183833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03430785,0.013513203,0.0053988695,0.0017951466,0.0021908095,0.010739604,0.022807661,0.0060439664,0.0007745924,0.086378686,0.8153812,0.0006683821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030372166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000039816405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8902775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017929169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007405507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99834317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298006300","doi":"10.1136/jme-2022-108431","title":"Externalist argument against medical assistance in dying for psychiatric illness","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Externalism; Mental illness; Psychiatry; Argument (complex analysis); Judgement; Psychological intervention; Psychology; Medicine; Mental health; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06942031819920254,"score_gpt":0.3713471220779052,"score_spread":0.3019268038787027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298006300","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4668245,0.014796187,0.0026218102,0.45084733,0.0441317,0.00078327605,0.00010558075,0.000043212323,0.019846397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.949866,0.0014640933,0.00038252506,0.04285939,0.0046964255,0.00004765788,0.000011703548,0.00002560806,0.0006465848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99311507,0.00037751213,0.0010402182,0.00014590789,0.0049925903,0.00032868935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784493,0.0009057197,0.0004690579,0.0001134321,0.00015991757,0.0005069161],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01043231,0.00012179723,0.000321194,0.0001846272,0.00074331847,0.00006183333,0.0006338812,0.00023619273,0.0065801213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009483602,0.00009812574,0.00014996993,0.00008574206,0.00022388557,0.00008762331,0.00008392215,0.0041771336,0.0000037051045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016278852,0.0031452405,0.0033910596,0.0029983865,0.00014840279,0.0007491773,0.08284131,0.000072397896,0.0000044649078,0.74632454,0.0879882,0.07070892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034970734,0.0005843925,0.00010174428,0.0006755074,0.000026525053,0.00012103462,0.012765635,0.0012422749,0.000002199514,0.010078228,0.97068214,0.00022326362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009329059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012776477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88269395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017802042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00229646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99812025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311625308","doi":"10.1136/jme-2022-108449","title":"COVID-19 vaccine boosters for young adults: a risk benefit assessment and ethical analysis of mandate policies at universities","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Reactogenicity; Mandate; Harm; Medicine; Booster (rocketry); Public health; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Family medicine; Environmental health; Political science; Psychology; Immunization; Social psychology; Nursing; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Immunology; Disease; Law","score_opus":0.05456950120960275,"score_gpt":0.43690055332736044,"score_spread":0.3823310521177577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311625308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90602183,0.0009091277,0.0025347082,0.089861,0.00013678668,0.00020491822,0.00015707323,0.0000111365125,0.0001634225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8882283,0.0010233353,0.00045610726,0.11006175,0.00014096958,0.000008977485,0.000014030727,0.000016015347,0.000050510775],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99405736,0.00043419775,0.0007058684,0.00020271812,0.004309515,0.00029035035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940552,0.004098247,0.0005307709,0.00021254669,0.00067802466,0.00042522734],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0096943285,0.00014484866,0.0007575512,0.0008239924,0.0004072797,0.00001968062,0.00034732014,0.0005709797,0.00026089445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051235086,0.00011473882,0.00038975294,0.00067593553,0.00031782466,0.000047918755,0.00043846003,0.004843256,2.8161642e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03977832,0.0016597854,0.76533693,0.006741559,0.022288542,0.0032689136,0.09448363,0.0008286024,0.0033442804,0.036539756,0.017562995,0.008166691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.056006365,0.015205828,0.13434586,0.0012748964,0.020107245,0.0030894277,0.13396904,0.054494858,0.001434368,0.004587868,0.5744873,0.0009969347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016536193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012399002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63099104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009982794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005758112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311888120","doi":"10.1136/jme-2022-108369","title":"Ethical uncertainty and COVID-19: exploring the lived experiences of senior physicians at a major medical centre","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Disaster Response and Management","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Moral obligation; Moral dilemma; Action (physics); Pandemic; Psychological intervention; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Health care; Obligation; Qualitative research; Public relations; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Nursing; Medical education; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.1721504764814218,"score_gpt":0.4732912562840003,"score_spread":0.30114077980257853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311888120","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6285368,0.00031710885,0.00079613447,0.36847532,0.001241585,0.00021245859,0.000004268492,0.000012717528,0.00040359082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8992289,0.0013358099,0.000066126704,0.097945,0.0005729565,0.00008636194,0.0000021011742,0.000014518798,0.00074824493],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875024,0.004841061,0.0009450536,0.0001737251,0.0061738826,0.00036386945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98841465,0.009806806,0.00060416746,0.00020804962,0.00020222591,0.00076407887],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020979442,0.00012503372,0.00039235517,0.00009148165,0.0012485448,0.000008858744,0.0007459888,0.0004862078,0.0055015422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025499115,0.000076483724,0.00013063538,0.00021129797,0.00071503175,0.000055827935,0.0012170863,0.009078079,0.000005887188],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008412911,0.00018909734,0.00023916147,0.0005110362,0.00012326187,0.00047497192,0.94426924,0.00005001163,0.000020587313,0.007165807,0.041596927,0.0045185788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014463976,0.00020818943,0.000105034276,0.0004397274,0.000054034834,0.00006019026,0.6955529,0.0005656622,0.0000058878727,0.0007364246,0.3007436,0.00008198785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022895331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041468276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27069205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022218566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004069685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313289426","doi":"10.1136/jme-2022-108447","title":"Evidence, ethics and the promise of artificial intelligence in psychiatry","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; Hospital for Sick Children; University of Toronto","funders":"Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute; Associated Medical Services","keywords":"Humility; Unintended consequences; Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Big data; Applications of artificial intelligence; Data science; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.3882338438514403,"score_gpt":0.5242184120601984,"score_spread":0.1359845682087581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313289426","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37461215,0.007241228,0.0024871514,0.61278325,0.0024925119,0.00029072104,9.802378e-7,0.000004381571,0.00008759605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833282,0.008354142,0.00090537744,0.0068016844,0.0005771623,0.000009601181,4.789739e-7,0.0000069445687,0.000016408061],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938396,0.0013825397,0.0013214379,0.00011680296,0.0031733473,0.00016627336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878632,0.010313053,0.0005970048,0.00019883706,0.0007788108,0.00024912317],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03869245,0.00007787556,0.00033911513,0.00017994561,0.00022610417,0.00001136002,0.00028744288,0.0004319687,0.000383064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051017527,0.00005044453,0.00009811409,0.0004462123,0.0007252445,0.00006884967,0.00009604564,0.010789807,0.0000016585797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008886165,0.0017100321,0.02303557,0.0025097243,0.00012920405,0.00018899408,0.20450199,0.0004276704,0.00015561405,0.30094114,0.0025185775,0.4549953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010581057,0.005700816,0.0065170093,0.012706246,0.00048338663,0.0037610843,0.23820184,0.025249993,0.002245629,0.69611615,0.007493766,0.00046599557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005048407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042292604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6087161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007963483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008315677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313308139","doi":"10.1136/jme-2022-108813","title":"Why there is no dilemma for the birth strategy: a response to Bobier and Omelianchuk","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Autonomy; Abortion; Argument (complex analysis); Moral dilemma; Personal autonomy; Therapeutic abortion; Psychology; Intuition; Social psychology; Medicine; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.05010555082351278,"score_gpt":0.3764296481301047,"score_spread":0.32632409730659195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313308139","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40890604,0.0010673234,0.0006142296,0.58735025,0.0010135571,0.00027012298,0.000027823047,0.000012033468,0.00073862384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9045284,0.002344987,0.00021947567,0.09012517,0.0014346847,0.0000142197,3.797863e-7,0.000017563954,0.0013151404],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99541503,0.00095717533,0.00039332363,0.00012300372,0.0028277822,0.000283701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934213,0.00538653,0.00020676933,0.00013998571,0.0004316195,0.00041377763],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02075598,0.00009070476,0.00021152131,0.00007222376,0.0011897287,0.000116218296,0.00069923635,0.00026466956,0.0019264958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012620499,0.000057278714,0.00012720305,0.0002450192,0.00041102633,0.00009249039,0.0001046012,0.0021794268,0.000006337362],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005699466,0.00036762608,0.0030270705,0.00012006255,0.00037207967,0.00033198483,0.31533986,0.00012680174,0.0003226596,0.07832764,0.5729972,0.022967525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061930914,0.00043734646,0.0010164931,0.00006766017,0.000028252165,0.000026142376,0.018656783,0.00008946484,0.000012967949,0.002489738,0.97646874,0.00008709563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052472827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011177204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49722508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000065567954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024389252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319591417","doi":"10.1136/jme-2022-108731","title":"Conscientious commitment, professional obligations and abortion provision after the reversal of<i>Roe v Wade</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Uehiro Foundation on Ethics and Education; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Obligation; Conscience; Abortion; Sanctions; Law; Moral obligation; Political science; Health professionals; Professional responsibility; Health care; Professional conduct; Professional ethics; Conscientious objector; Public relations; Business","score_opus":0.044988007105758294,"score_gpt":0.41302367260678835,"score_spread":0.36803566550103006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319591417","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7311159,0.0006627993,0.00043234945,0.2665913,0.0008667296,0.0002649358,0.0000034583525,0.000009790023,0.000052747877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99362534,0.002179111,0.0001819243,0.0031024031,0.00058809004,0.000009221626,0.0000052529936,0.000005569341,0.0003030808],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967963,0.00025299384,0.00051665015,0.00010641576,0.0021931692,0.00013446866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795127,0.00060902815,0.00031957906,0.00013002245,0.0007660554,0.00022404347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007190713,0.00006192724,0.00019119316,0.00010611996,0.0001417719,0.000009551544,0.000080400205,0.00029398,0.00007412572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005659542,0.000033982982,0.000069501715,0.00029120105,0.00038446096,0.000082987885,0.00004081481,0.0018165805,0.000006837884],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011878815,0.003424068,0.31622556,0.007276945,0.00079373206,0.0011925971,0.06592443,0.000038800714,0.027442541,0.028564168,0.2427179,0.29452044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005476819,0.0015135095,0.8689666,0.0036679409,0.00031836514,0.0010694406,0.003669441,0.0013036772,0.00058817375,0.008591458,0.1046826,0.00015196457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013575708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016131113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55274105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030573487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015708035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78922397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367048460","doi":"10.1136/jme-2022-108871","title":"Choosing death in unjust conditions: hope, autonomy and harm reduction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Optimism, Hope, and Well-being","field":"Psychology","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Argument (complex analysis); Injustice; Harm; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.07822555958557753,"score_gpt":0.4268559696965457,"score_spread":0.3486304101109682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367048460","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8937894,0.0011413523,0.001013915,0.07994735,0.004492651,0.00014935953,0.000003736395,0.00006247175,0.019399729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99370134,0.0025403015,0.00039574568,0.0016363539,0.0010209067,0.000003978702,0.000005327091,0.0000171769,0.000678846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979047,0.00030499863,0.0005350458,0.00014264838,0.00087784237,0.0002347719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854404,0.0007429829,0.00020216231,0.000103441285,0.00016050944,0.0002468862],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005541404,0.00009357563,0.0002287759,0.00030784908,0.00011582221,0.000040623305,0.0001685846,0.0006572839,0.00062954985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016409481,0.00008213942,0.000056842528,0.00033307073,0.00017503058,0.0001488629,0.000040953564,0.0032037818,0.000058875663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000833695,0.0018553345,0.023554103,0.00093857606,0.0010709226,0.009902729,0.25966734,0.0012692811,0.001472332,0.34881383,0.1686142,0.18200766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.023238875,0.0020517209,0.37810192,0.008935837,0.00061768014,0.013597744,0.07433272,0.006457789,0.0006152712,0.13559633,0.35467103,0.0017830654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000097326556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001044182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35454783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000074823016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007613958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99909586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377970626","doi":"10.1136/jme-2023-109163","title":"University-age vaccine mandates: reply to Lam and Nichols","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Computer science; Medicine; Data science","score_opus":0.05674516991293532,"score_gpt":0.38285988003921334,"score_spread":0.326114710126278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377970626","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33230636,0.00027897637,0.0005071066,0.6603809,0.00065173133,0.00008587164,0.0000023164891,0.00004391971,0.0057428507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9072504,0.03716938,0.00076285494,0.036395386,0.0029805852,4.0289083e-7,0.0000023040368,0.000020610525,0.0154180825],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755865,0.0002669689,0.00022249464,0.000092644965,0.0016663146,0.00019290826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800736,0.0010419928,0.00010220804,0.00008087877,0.0002773634,0.0004901934],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007824092,0.000053890868,0.00017555368,0.0001476727,0.00029242146,0.0000460335,0.0003537011,0.0003124198,0.00034949635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009540701,0.000046013705,0.000053932446,0.00047441936,0.000026096533,0.00015996359,0.00009948818,0.001309508,0.000043255965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025450773,0.00011799114,0.016483264,0.00014080643,0.00012971023,0.008939959,0.0924675,0.000014329037,0.000105730775,0.07357523,0.78075975,0.027011199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006428433,0.00013190704,0.011497948,0.00022381997,0.000022750137,0.00002126406,0.00616234,0.000008070933,0.0000075600406,0.0028959091,0.97831225,0.00007335034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026559396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013029183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62398547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047046447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009114085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99880236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378211709","doi":"10.1136/jme-2022-108781","title":"Patient data for commercial companies? An ethical framework for sharing patients’ data with for-profit companies for research","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Terry Fox Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Data sharing; Normative; Public relations; Business; Profit (economics); Medical ethics; Public health; Medical research; Research ethics; Empirical research; Order (exchange); Normative model of decision-making; Knowledge management; Medicine; Political science; Engineering ethics; Economics; Computer science; Alternative medicine; Law; Nursing; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.8693394198951242,"score_gpt":0.6976869539436653,"score_spread":0.1716524659514589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378211709","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10661612,0.0002741081,0.374352,0.50452214,0.0023849343,0.006980329,0.004706619,0.00010759647,0.000056116456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.494005,0.0031561176,0.45316413,0.027153322,0.011048782,0.0006714328,0.010178582,0.00041639278,0.00020623392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9819457,0.000677835,0.00207713,0.0010799923,0.012912452,0.0013069031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.33902463,0.61638993,0.001531432,0.0065730247,0.03292645,0.0035545328],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1366146,0.00029898217,0.0012159529,0.00039907589,0.001005524,0.00021581509,0.00514865,0.0049880794,0.000047240635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6289866,0.00021582609,0.00024114462,0.00063033315,0.0018566583,0.0003501631,0.0028349163,0.029119296,0.0000048444845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.04429573,0.002038819,0.020323172,0.020452008,0.0017103032,0.00010330376,0.009274767,0.00009010035,0.000024431189,0.62432295,0.23745468,0.039909735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.025415005,0.036289208,0.006664023,0.015391092,0.0007559407,0.00006304895,0.008089266,0.14670888,0.00008821655,0.61644083,0.14332475,0.00076974137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000056103232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001286358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6429211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018817981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009192584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378781679","doi":"10.1136/jme-2022-108866","title":"The ethics of firing unvaccinated employees","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Vaccination; Measles; Medicine; Business; Public relations; Political science; Immunology","score_opus":0.10323783324759633,"score_gpt":0.43739089928932207,"score_spread":0.33415306604172573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378781679","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26761648,0.0025752208,0.00046831902,0.7238907,0.002103294,0.000085777174,0.0000014369648,0.00004976906,0.003208948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96460557,0.032637417,0.00006115091,0.0012401774,0.00088426686,6.209555e-7,3.1438663e-7,0.00000869425,0.00056178373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99385905,0.00089231564,0.0005720272,0.00006770122,0.004345605,0.00026327863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874166,0.010782847,0.00036055184,0.000119065866,0.0010897052,0.00023121935],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.030521808,0.00006524051,0.00020511095,0.00008596928,0.0007519994,0.000051913485,0.00078167726,0.00087565696,0.0001845134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07549692,0.000041282245,0.0001428254,0.00058563345,0.00012369036,0.00012237001,0.00009012886,0.004716321,0.000018414281],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020269654,0.00026293178,0.026064912,0.00045460463,0.00038355382,0.0008715895,0.27529496,0.00012046159,0.00019600973,0.46944335,0.15111557,0.07558937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015601375,0.00048664716,0.030336337,0.001704156,0.000104801606,0.000036570553,0.029416662,0.00019046055,0.0004301102,0.13522507,0.80022734,0.00028168593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021255782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025810793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7226506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004270165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003913106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99828184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379983373","doi":"10.1136/jme-2022-108825","title":"Blaming the unvaccinated during the COVID-19 pandemic: the roles of political ideology and risk perceptions in the USA","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of Otago","keywords":"Scapegoating; Vignette; Misinformation; Blame; Vaccination; Pandemic; Prejudice (legal term); Ideology; Social psychology; Risk perception; Politics; Scapegoat; Public health; Psychology; Medicine; Criminology; Perception; Immunology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Disease; Political science; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Law","score_opus":0.2169085318955633,"score_gpt":0.4226901964965032,"score_spread":0.20578166460093988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379983373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6658196,0.00006153328,0.00007459497,0.33374718,0.00017523003,0.000055413893,0.00000351885,0.0000045572083,0.00005837096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9724657,0.0033239708,0.0000050312465,0.023981825,0.00018284644,0.000003123514,1.884424e-7,0.0000034749482,0.000033830023],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954562,0.0023092933,0.0004330109,0.00012125521,0.0014113992,0.000268793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861441,0.013287302,0.00020355865,0.00016589605,0.00006264933,0.0001364674],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01195822,0.00008046031,0.0001487851,0.00007106746,0.0005665209,0.000021084701,0.00088529184,0.00028099478,0.00009876258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023936464,0.000028611117,0.000081266124,0.00031507944,0.0015646584,0.00004344849,0.00016202313,0.0038468984,0.000008474617],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000391131,0.0004861891,0.63111466,0.00017507761,0.00012237152,0.00076967926,0.06699869,0.0013608235,0.0106975315,0.2778601,0.0058204834,0.0042032246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009943577,0.0001411562,0.94212806,0.000073532916,0.000050066406,0.0033459598,0.010223286,0.0007820584,0.00008700208,0.03886642,0.0032383986,0.000069712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017482413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011238909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31101337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037763602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031424582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383226457","doi":"10.1136/jme-2023-109061","title":"Guerrilla eugenics: gene drives in heritable human genome editing","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"CRISPR and Genetic Engineering","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Genome editing; Eugenics; CRISPR; Genome; Bioethics; Genetics; Biology; Human genome; Human genetics; Cas9; Gene","score_opus":0.024889606380148005,"score_gpt":0.38250375514905777,"score_spread":0.35761414876890973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383226457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98668796,0.0026470681,0.005550901,0.003954583,0.00071747706,0.000048879814,0.0000036684432,0.000011549081,0.0003778932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99302363,0.0034954643,0.000842136,0.00040454254,0.0020399978,0.000001552992,0.000016769307,0.000019116336,0.0001567934],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982251,0.00007596068,0.0004248951,0.00012608278,0.00089860434,0.00024938243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935997,0.000071910035,0.00010459176,0.00013136954,0.00014638722,0.00018575035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031767946,0.00009558778,0.0001797442,0.00010143973,0.00005813265,0.000016962738,0.00030197605,0.00056865235,0.00004517684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018697159,0.00008704601,0.000095907155,0.00016454198,0.000071361355,0.0000032949035,0.00013595703,0.0011022658,0.0000059969498],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020013951,0.00005847833,0.0017312537,0.00013851367,0.0000916615,0.0003362385,0.001149386,0.0055172485,0.986617,0.0002924188,0.0022565476,0.0017911978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007669747,0.0022076126,0.06251665,0.0013251404,0.0001312826,0.0016860369,0.006129731,0.004593271,0.31763595,0.0036335385,0.59095055,0.0015204746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013948394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000942513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6689811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001521182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003012443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47888577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384337927","doi":"10.1136/jme-2023-109327","title":"Medically assisted dying in Canada and unjust social conditions: a response to Wiebe and Mullin","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Optimism, Hope, and Well-being","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Horizon Health Network; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; Dalhousie University; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Medicine; Data science; Computer science","score_opus":0.059660416526296195,"score_gpt":0.40755795476036616,"score_spread":0.34789753823407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384337927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8525801,0.00018058575,0.0001789088,0.14567123,0.00063213764,0.00007079144,0.0000074327872,0.000011473813,0.00066735223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98929805,0.00041245396,0.0001546036,0.009624874,0.00032947655,0.0000039189454,0.0000024219407,0.000014093263,0.00016011499],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962874,0.00090559025,0.0006311909,0.00016201915,0.0017099455,0.00030386634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99430674,0.0047345823,0.00016642851,0.000078976205,0.00016719382,0.0005460789],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009981699,0.00010731693,0.00031998934,0.00024025286,0.00015425569,0.000028360717,0.00020088124,0.0005835252,0.0004151031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008714506,0.000093611445,0.00003369318,0.00038635996,0.0002105,0.000051116076,0.00007786903,0.0028542154,0.000008896061],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010611596,0.0008610458,0.02479831,0.00093290757,0.0012462632,0.06418547,0.3035442,0.00018269554,0.0025858933,0.029464094,0.35497922,0.20660833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013752077,0.0010464058,0.8221326,0.0027773085,0.00019786651,0.0027685985,0.08690895,0.0015409956,0.000027449116,0.0050387387,0.06298684,0.000822205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.080890805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41792735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79733425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015241756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042509907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384922373","doi":"10.1136/jme-2023-109183","title":"Existential spectrum of suffering: concepts and moral valuations for assessing intensity and tolerability","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Mental Health and Psychiatry","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Counterexample; Tolerability; Neglect; Existentialism; Psychology; Broad spectrum; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Psychiatry; Medicine; Philosophy; Alternative medicine; Mathematics","score_opus":0.27853683274919244,"score_gpt":0.46308719353538597,"score_spread":0.18455036078619352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384922373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96348983,0.00026432934,0.00034757567,0.032824505,0.0019905237,0.000095754556,0.000012819124,0.000008002955,0.0009666407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99795413,0.00023608778,0.00022946444,0.0007395253,0.0007691137,8.92956e-7,0.0000028534155,0.000003829658,0.00006412718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860924,0.000093088674,0.00041818887,0.00006741675,0.00069407496,0.000117994474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986039,0.0007260912,0.00019480928,0.000046018555,0.00024291397,0.00018626137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004202837,0.00005300447,0.00022026342,0.000056309516,0.00022799787,0.000045655488,0.00006571216,0.00013952552,0.00021450028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010813378,0.00004021714,0.000051754345,0.000025457619,0.0004527838,0.000095406445,0.00003327452,0.00072511384,4.902884e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007155099,0.00044767105,0.029806415,0.0055938857,0.00018268195,0.000036946374,0.14827853,0.0000087720255,0.00006286354,0.77901995,0.013981712,0.021865025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012421656,0.0047075297,0.13722375,0.004749367,0.0005635803,0.0004971151,0.12500435,0.01962414,0.00030732845,0.5310814,0.16299212,0.00082770083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009304893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003319699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24793863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011996521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039357634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31502992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385197054","doi":"10.1136/jme-2022-108687","title":"<i>Sabr</i>and<i>Shukr</i>: doing justice to medical futility","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Medical Research and Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"SABR volatility model; Economic Justice; Psychology; Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.31777610386720434,"score_gpt":0.6276954937020801,"score_spread":0.30991938983487577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385197054","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04646442,0.0010945662,0.005061714,0.9299818,0.0042854175,0.00030256406,0.000008795568,0.00008972046,0.012710985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4741854,0.10507582,0.004638032,0.39387932,0.018174296,0.000059056594,0.000014240133,0.00009986052,0.003873962],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97949725,0.0037666617,0.0014394554,0.0002497134,0.014108983,0.0009379417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91807973,0.070972696,0.00058570417,0.00036060973,0.0014884211,0.008512841],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.093742386,0.00016056179,0.00053139887,0.0002577688,0.00082579546,0.000027896134,0.0009478622,0.002031848,0.00980174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5136827,0.000109020824,0.00010926439,0.0007805906,0.0004191606,0.00021564662,0.0007289199,0.020499792,0.0009095431],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011402363,0.00026482946,0.0027719212,0.005084979,0.00019219013,0.00411392,0.022511214,0.0000036926942,0.0001247288,0.020083692,0.7490308,0.19467776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014203828,0.00030837767,0.0019298281,0.0025687125,0.0000682872,0.00011437509,0.0054405234,0.00062914565,0.000009304371,0.0019274905,0.9854587,0.00012489983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021770778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000464645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5361025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007972463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01430195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385975899","doi":"10.1136/jme-2023-109410","title":"Vaccine mandates for prospective versus existing employees: reply to Smith","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Argument (complex analysis); Prospective cohort study; Psychological intervention; Actuarial science; Psychology; Public relations; Business; Medicine; Law; Political science; Surgery; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.13496927927844693,"score_gpt":0.4564557404982805,"score_spread":0.3214864612198336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385975899","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28817907,0.0007877167,0.0069520813,0.6901169,0.0054538,0.00068369973,0.000011550825,0.00017443839,0.007640805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95772296,0.005972405,0.0055607627,0.012700696,0.013581974,0.00003613705,0.000004195368,0.00006166974,0.004359216],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967806,0.00015803463,0.0004392929,0.00013775929,0.0021682011,0.00031616082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944644,0.003825428,0.00021280456,0.000097697695,0.0009837972,0.00041587776],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010160732,0.00008293969,0.00024865317,0.000131843,0.0004702748,0.0000684638,0.00042665654,0.00032576584,0.0001701433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06469668,0.00006593815,0.0001221662,0.00049553346,0.000022574297,0.00015567793,0.000066643144,0.0012035166,0.000031594947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027334245,0.00030195323,0.025271928,0.00040756285,0.0003859611,0.0007975195,0.16553853,0.000063720945,0.000045860026,0.12150287,0.6519993,0.03095135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004919369,0.0021138282,0.01227903,0.001077688,0.00010457985,0.000016178614,0.020139439,0.000072565694,0.0001259742,0.026915677,0.9319437,0.00029198013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016580161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009290217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67741615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000119022945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020844168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94318175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386365175","doi":"10.1136/jme-2023-109498","title":"Academic freedom under siege","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Siege; Warrant; Academic freedom; Bioethics; Politics; Sociology; Political science; Global justice; Law; Law and economics; Public relations; Economics; Higher education","score_opus":0.32395826831330243,"score_gpt":0.6108742725623971,"score_spread":0.2869160042490947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386365175","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021684526,0.0008070348,0.010035155,0.93527126,0.014223975,0.00020381971,0.0000048339116,0.00015259074,0.017616814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67205924,0.05255029,0.0026832435,0.24447496,0.021888137,0.000020320364,0.00000980136,0.00012687714,0.0061871377],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97824293,0.007850834,0.0018622369,0.00019359642,0.0111363325,0.00071405934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87690306,0.11871755,0.001172382,0.0003297401,0.0016130405,0.0012642555],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14077315,0.00015632503,0.00047324316,0.0002654596,0.00095708837,0.000009105956,0.0012754396,0.006538373,0.0038445408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4298233,0.00011423206,0.00015457677,0.00074214936,0.0008396464,0.00024682566,0.00045824324,0.12558933,0.0021245377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013101952,0.000086776854,0.0019674355,0.0008505256,0.0001436286,0.00077549205,0.0148642585,0.00007214985,0.0001794984,0.39781716,0.58033895,0.0027731245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027643123,0.00022117555,0.0041136704,0.0041719605,0.0001226511,0.00017194264,0.022645947,0.0010959835,0.000011592158,0.37296626,0.59146297,0.0002515521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008815799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010932563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6907963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001877982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010030452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387950451","doi":"10.1136/jme-2023-109425","title":"Consent to testing for brain death","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Informed consent; Duty; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Guideline; Nothing; Psychology; Authorization; Medicine; Political science; Alternative medicine; Computer science; Computer security; Philosophy; Epistemology; Pathology","score_opus":0.2700990621690148,"score_gpt":0.4771288001788872,"score_spread":0.2070297380098724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387950451","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16418646,0.000041199215,0.029948281,0.8039445,0.00068547146,0.00019894379,0.0000062995473,0.00004596971,0.00094282604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94241995,0.00017311491,0.01130798,0.04427655,0.0010374273,0.000003252759,0.00001070271,0.000017118546,0.0007539252],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980398,0.000047262572,0.00030129394,0.000051950363,0.0014569147,0.00010278624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940128,0.0050030793,0.000082638595,0.000040280695,0.0005446734,0.00031654138],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045089475,0.000042462572,0.00013638372,0.00013685331,0.00004581219,0.000008668653,0.00006397277,0.00022800628,0.00008396434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042228505,0.0000318388,0.00005308937,0.00022582833,0.000026488447,0.000021037566,0.000007708147,0.000830463,0.000026959397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030390492,0.001121716,0.07972903,0.007882572,0.00092599797,0.0067826654,0.037432283,0.0003288361,0.03425818,0.12168981,0.50047326,0.20633657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.036805525,0.0099155335,0.34525815,0.015500447,0.0009663439,0.010321769,0.0044735395,0.013196428,0.0115195,0.022443602,0.52883077,0.00076843787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005903149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016216889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77823347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002491652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014818445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9658392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388540984","doi":"10.1136/jme-2023-109549","title":"Exploring the potential utility of AI large language models for medical ethics: an expert panel evaluation of GPT-4","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; London Health Sciences Centre; Alberta Health Services; University Health Network; University of Toronto; Dalhousie University; Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences; The Scarborough Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Readability; Counterintuitive; Beneficence; Psychology; Medical ethics; Intraclass correlation; Reliability (semiconductor); Medical education; Engineering ethics; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Psychometrics; Clinical psychology; Epistemology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.7501689367813249,"score_gpt":0.592878808201445,"score_spread":0.1572901285798799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388540984","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80241084,0.0008283113,0.035281047,0.15902176,0.0020309086,0.0003561672,0.000009976607,0.000017418579,0.000043586515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99116063,0.003659729,0.0002743024,0.0032177283,0.0016221708,0.000023399189,0.000018904404,0.0000140435595,0.00000910427],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887504,0.0010484871,0.0013092217,0.00015180273,0.008467706,0.000272359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902283,0.0044576735,0.0004439196,0.0003058636,0.0041053966,0.00045882873],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06628073,0.000102065285,0.00038408898,0.00015617255,0.00015330137,0.0000093534045,0.00034559955,0.00094050105,0.00040445625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068609156,0.0000663928,0.0001977084,0.0002897059,0.00031074,0.00023011545,0.000053491825,0.004172462,0.00000272972],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001569667,0.0017543174,0.00090475066,0.0027350124,0.00032757223,0.00009059583,0.4159815,0.00095080864,0.0016438024,0.009262208,0.0051230732,0.5596567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011353149,0.0012221623,0.0026343595,0.0031218464,0.00041979476,0.00017199731,0.13399038,0.8059658,0.010532901,0.039013974,0.0016179298,0.00017355166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007450235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046582008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80501497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058365695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009618257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99812496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388705729","doi":"10.1136/jme-2023-109472","title":"Caring as the unacknowledged matrix of evidence-based nursing","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Virtue; Nursing care; Conversation; Normative; Nursing; Nursing ethics; Feminist ethics; Engineering ethics; Virtue ethics; Argument (complex analysis); Psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Medicine; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.4706264749917194,"score_gpt":0.6391155586408688,"score_spread":0.16848908364914938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388705729","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03767622,0.002795513,0.005428629,0.93734074,0.008497445,0.00032594296,0.0000017716023,0.00007198437,0.007861776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96495396,0.009044761,0.0012676148,0.020264527,0.0033414504,0.000008840563,0.0000011892474,0.00004508062,0.0010725561],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97776234,0.010984187,0.0017519817,0.0001612742,0.008835561,0.0005046484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76405483,0.2296367,0.0017077727,0.00049202755,0.0034452192,0.00066345616],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14106387,0.0001364346,0.00046252573,0.0002226998,0.0010532588,0.0000131738225,0.0012264526,0.0021675688,0.0012392371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6124075,0.00007417296,0.000194081,0.0008829958,0.0012556618,0.000208031,0.00018878328,0.04261012,0.0003716198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001828655,0.00087510335,0.011249944,0.010872629,0.00059370615,0.001554553,0.210433,0.0007336748,0.0017652755,0.44097552,0.258593,0.06052497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0076230834,0.0016387287,0.008425177,0.21302858,0.0011206134,0.00028719215,0.12197333,0.01322769,0.0008739112,0.40251833,0.228544,0.00073936704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016444454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008828815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92727774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023914757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01661709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390333652","doi":"10.1136/jme-2023-109797","title":"No consent for brain death testing","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Organ Donation and Transplantation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Informed consent; Duty; Law; Psychology; Medicine; Psychiatry; Political science; Alternative medicine; Pathology","score_opus":0.24339505789583127,"score_gpt":0.45769475862108727,"score_spread":0.214299700725256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390333652","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15895903,0.00016797773,0.030933369,0.80140954,0.002273414,0.00035461283,0.000014838129,0.00011865106,0.005768572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9361101,0.0012528399,0.014535422,0.041797623,0.002847935,0.000004475367,0.000035498397,0.00003531433,0.0033808087],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793005,0.000057609886,0.00033032152,0.000051431995,0.0015264279,0.000104159815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926479,0.0061599263,0.00012676971,0.000041785206,0.00079761364,0.000226004],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047347583,0.000046311543,0.00014603669,0.00010461463,0.000051999312,0.000008961129,0.00006363125,0.000292097,0.00014869668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046176832,0.00003415895,0.00006617989,0.0001597196,0.00004826175,0.00002863189,0.000006553259,0.0010897093,0.00004151673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038207162,0.0016868679,0.08935676,0.015289643,0.0015070171,0.00979147,0.019205794,0.0001513413,0.035785586,0.12751153,0.55996835,0.1359249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.041738328,0.005919802,0.1668542,0.013025885,0.0010051578,0.010275748,0.0018173899,0.03438322,0.0056076255,0.016904188,0.7018308,0.0006376571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006074384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008651852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77715105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023059914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017613504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9618576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390450366","doi":"10.1136/jme-2023-109739","title":"The name of the game: a Wittgensteinian view of ‘invasiveness’","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Computer science; Data science; Philosophy; World Wide Web; Psychology","score_opus":0.10532174792513928,"score_gpt":0.33026521465493835,"score_spread":0.2249434667297991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390450366","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27934828,0.0061440133,0.00009039436,0.68049663,0.0037211492,0.00046290137,0.00007867799,0.00004126933,0.029616654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99476665,0.0028677697,0.000011594245,0.00093784684,0.000824127,0.0000034274124,6.042711e-7,0.000009750055,0.0005781984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968768,0.00024226763,0.00071456586,0.00006655248,0.0019580822,0.00014175326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99639887,0.0019160742,0.00062774064,0.00026855894,0.0006867352,0.00010201289],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003721853,0.00008431831,0.0002504069,0.00004760931,0.00030326328,0.000030939544,0.0008113408,0.00019661304,0.00027173138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022369032,0.00004038918,0.00024456021,0.00015184561,0.0014951079,0.000054962216,0.00010378603,0.0014239503,0.000018352888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002080454,0.000068258996,0.000032400367,0.00020698782,0.00010532865,0.000009826269,0.027162563,0.00001055338,0.00009122949,0.9606866,0.0039950316,0.0076103816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045912463,0.0001554275,0.00043000863,0.0010072559,0.000087967,0.00004314062,0.0047815884,0.000056512446,0.0005358085,0.10129763,0.89106095,0.00008459968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023032075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014155214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8870659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010527051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009021778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61864346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392154032","doi":"10.1136/jme-2023-109563","title":"Ladders and stairs: how the intervention ladder focuses blame on individuals and obscures systemic failings and interventions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Health disparities and outcomes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; Psychological intervention; Intervention (counseling); Stairs; Psychology; Computer security; Criminology; Social psychology; Computer science; Psychiatry; Engineering","score_opus":0.10396347375071407,"score_gpt":0.446165445643127,"score_spread":0.3422019718924129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392154032","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39480406,0.035899367,0.00058128603,0.5673524,0.00102979,0.00014597367,0.000009088959,0.000020962885,0.00015708269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9735076,0.023635354,0.000042883647,0.002227542,0.00036310643,0.0000025608344,3.7467134e-7,0.000005788915,0.00021482693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973773,0.000653471,0.00036025821,0.00010230994,0.0013264349,0.0001802622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99600506,0.003410442,0.00014591453,0.00004875321,0.00012458036,0.000265233],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010877633,0.00007606868,0.00018861568,0.00009274961,0.00035304957,0.00044667767,0.00015615603,0.00035565667,0.00007145912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008408159,0.000045063876,0.00010562783,0.000095077674,0.0006385048,0.00021917488,0.00006823379,0.0016341025,8.182608e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045887442,0.0001507645,0.02127963,0.010316541,0.00057784416,0.00016951557,0.20894241,0.0000026680798,0.0000031822208,0.5926516,0.040380646,0.12547934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021225302,0.0010699335,0.032861944,0.0542898,0.0005233235,0.00049113535,0.4977875,0.00031537726,0.000011529843,0.04674752,0.36334026,0.0004391576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005977322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00221708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5787035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034768444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047357855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392452288","doi":"10.1136/jme-2023-109555","title":"Words matter: ‘enduring intolerable suffering’ and the provider-side peril of Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vetting; Argument (complex analysis); Legislation; Terminology; CLARITY; Law; Psychology; Medicine; Psychiatry; Political science","score_opus":0.07762384026849153,"score_gpt":0.4710796919623483,"score_spread":0.3934558516938568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392452288","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27091283,0.0089045195,0.0011985281,0.7102133,0.0037766697,0.00028530488,0.0000020912032,0.000011840823,0.0046949154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770775,0.006512328,0.000320972,0.0154237,0.00053185306,0.000014734416,3.6118328e-7,0.000023149898,0.00009540116],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9820903,0.0061800834,0.0023172,0.00024550856,0.008614568,0.00055235415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9262401,0.07198766,0.00059786707,0.00025706654,0.00033009725,0.0005872419],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.093947366,0.00016491012,0.0006878722,0.00018707081,0.00026733047,0.000035330446,0.0008527237,0.0014496009,0.0014394351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13494274,0.00010458711,0.00006136765,0.0004541104,0.00083881454,0.0002326734,0.00040403113,0.048809092,0.0000054425263],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024715934,0.0004678239,0.30389598,0.048753288,0.00052757456,0.016104134,0.2953697,0.0002238826,0.00010541468,0.26501045,0.025883308,0.041186847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.025823683,0.00032995795,0.07209526,0.25390106,0.00033545785,0.0020478168,0.24785051,0.09018288,0.000088421955,0.1391832,0.16680281,0.0013589576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4702581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8373886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70616466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008404642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038298473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394759106","doi":"10.1136/jme-2023-109702","title":"AI and the falling sky: interrogating X-Risk","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Falling (accident); Sky; Data science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Medicine; Astronomy; Physics; Environmental health","score_opus":0.06793008412189912,"score_gpt":0.47300655205397196,"score_spread":0.40507646793207286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394759106","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031141648,0.005809909,0.0028732794,0.9525252,0.0019510494,0.000057520807,9.864978e-7,0.00002275814,0.0056176325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96073616,0.025081515,0.0001691757,0.011904143,0.0020125294,3.4982276e-7,6.523371e-8,0.000006301307,0.0000897585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951707,0.0011330433,0.00037104677,0.00007135942,0.003070484,0.00018337951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98931026,0.009584812,0.00016946404,0.000052732186,0.0005692062,0.000313518],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05341775,0.00006104757,0.00018112353,0.000047569858,0.0007102401,0.0005315554,0.00036542205,0.0007203514,0.00009740114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.077487506,0.000034604407,0.00012569177,0.00016085015,0.0016678225,0.00027760182,0.00006852619,0.0083790375,0.0000038821827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017123944,0.000011242466,0.000059662267,0.00004920279,0.000078261684,0.0000724592,0.3484416,0.0000034906532,0.0000021568185,0.6136462,0.0016104082,0.036008194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009092032,0.00011439191,0.00006824214,0.0021537212,0.00014108988,0.000044672262,0.084533416,0.0032089246,0.000006388067,0.73460454,0.17407708,0.00013835181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015657644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004391428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9406211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045065277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026656052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99390864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400060659","doi":"10.1136/jme-2023-108917","title":"Ethical issues in residency education related to the COVID-19 pandemic: a narrative inquiry study","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hospital for Sick Children; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Narrative; Health care; Public health; Medical education; Nonprobability sampling; Medical ethics; Duty; Ethical issues; Research ethics; Psychology; Medicine; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Public relations; Nursing; Engineering ethics; Political science; Pathology; Law","score_opus":0.3521322570414868,"score_gpt":0.6703403286062593,"score_spread":0.31820807156477243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400060659","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07507889,0.003798674,0.001059858,0.9083357,0.009445336,0.00082751416,0.0000010464038,0.00006126903,0.0013917098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76008296,0.005184318,0.0005087148,0.22976547,0.0029877354,0.00007954317,0.0000018940696,0.00003544998,0.0013539229],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.94848186,0.03974277,0.0025466986,0.00038783095,0.008336828,0.0005040212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83261335,0.16281725,0.00068529276,0.0005353415,0.0017101916,0.0016385531],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.23574345,0.0001947704,0.000507169,0.0003963215,0.0010448798,0.000051110746,0.0011370783,0.00485029,0.002092991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6948132,0.00011585335,0.00010507899,0.0012101198,0.0006910465,0.00023584723,0.00037227126,0.1265169,0.0002689171],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016500645,0.0003167659,0.005763616,0.00049882993,0.00007804732,0.00046355362,0.75644624,0.000018224931,0.0000058151736,0.06260556,0.17202385,0.0016145215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086153706,0.0005357762,0.0018420763,0.0037165568,0.000077278266,0.00025563463,0.48643452,0.00009312271,3.235253e-7,0.14754777,0.35849217,0.00014324594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015903977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008603583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68500406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008863427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056775477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99881923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400356374","doi":"10.1136/jme-2024-110161","title":"The intervention ladder and the ethical appraisal of systemic public health interventions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Public Health Policies and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychological intervention; Intervention (counseling); Public health interventions; Public health; Medicine; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Nursing; Engineering","score_opus":0.21905977008635938,"score_gpt":0.6022176517355041,"score_spread":0.38315788164914477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400356374","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011740396,0.021494165,0.012137844,0.945647,0.008315394,0.0002815419,0.000005628802,0.00001846473,0.00035956313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.960964,0.022871647,0.00006822511,0.01363156,0.002053019,0.00003261025,0.0000031680083,0.00001444682,0.00036127653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98748964,0.00746923,0.0023424213,0.000111538786,0.0021394282,0.00044772893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96164894,0.03500042,0.0012565118,0.00026357474,0.0011670365,0.00066349335],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.101949885,0.00008766385,0.0003710623,0.00013659261,0.00090721546,0.00006580595,0.00044712808,0.0009971877,0.00019665626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048187498,0.000041247582,0.0002772471,0.00030390482,0.00076764164,0.000115577874,0.00016433225,0.012122019,0.000012419122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005030121,0.00007883048,0.00016958796,0.007034742,0.00014432585,0.0000025667684,0.056462575,6.17449e-7,9.786952e-7,0.76438355,0.13383697,0.037834957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026370734,0.00043430956,0.0024327242,0.027949031,0.00008037676,0.00039353472,0.095134094,0.0022880908,3.3694513e-7,0.015244521,0.8532993,0.00010659309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00097550196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006690012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94922364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016202065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009458133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99615735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401330783","doi":"10.1136/jme-2024-110326","title":"The intervention stairway: a defence and clarifications","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Accounting and Organizational Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Intervention (counseling); Computer science; Data science; Computer security; Psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.017979900589197663,"score_gpt":0.3124926935415326,"score_spread":0.2945127929523349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401330783","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008877174,0.0057549216,0.0050898516,0.09278241,0.8947081,0.000120501245,0.000006163748,0.00004650254,0.0014027997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0040989174,0.0063268533,0.000075831245,0.0014230377,0.9868446,0.000004121584,0.000042542335,0.000041069008,0.0011430542],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994229,0.000049417013,0.00072739774,0.00017268612,0.00465493,0.00016656147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944431,0.0023968914,0.0009001393,0.00017493329,0.0020516962,0.00003322801],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011570572,0.00016266655,0.0002260353,0.00021238902,0.00037494564,0.001177142,0.00075539714,0.0012633459,0.00010695129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03887879,0.00010267654,0.00013332209,0.0003468977,0.00023283539,0.000356155,0.000436418,0.0062308456,0.00010770238],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000112879125,0.000029222678,0.000015725696,0.00078945316,0.000084372085,0.000025901389,0.00006325229,0.000002840518,1.8268366e-7,0.04586518,0.94868374,0.0044288496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020166537,0.000013933499,0.000029650777,0.0013284653,0.000238629,0.000004309692,0.00037706218,0.00041061404,1.2899153e-7,0.021929385,0.9753632,0.000102970655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013229971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026031857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.092136495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005795837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007157533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401356475","doi":"10.1136/jme-2024-110307","title":"Birth’s transformative shift: a response to Waleszczyński","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06822217629671663,"score_gpt":0.4652542541486391,"score_spread":0.39703207785192246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401356475","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.090941876,0.008496553,0.011052809,0.8855114,0.002179315,0.00020584182,0.0000146347,0.000054462445,0.0015431133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9688527,0.0047694226,0.0014311495,0.022328906,0.0021054375,0.0000032688945,0.0000013190463,0.000026731354,0.00048109246],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99265647,0.00062744005,0.0009814667,0.00016617794,0.0052442644,0.00032415692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99198025,0.0055164904,0.00009833256,0.00018640523,0.00074028026,0.0014782551],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026223214,0.00015599736,0.00047375014,0.0004374529,0.00009015601,0.000060714003,0.00029911505,0.0014439623,0.00067566754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024167513,0.00010562781,0.00026028257,0.00061446114,0.00018730093,0.00013310384,0.000046008063,0.012324111,0.00011429524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012287342,0.0007269322,0.00048055063,0.01458111,0.0008382131,0.038482614,0.61384785,0.000032379714,0.00048165693,0.10752483,0.06042736,0.15028915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010872942,0.0024139963,0.0009819213,0.0050149313,0.00012862556,0.0019697382,0.0020209393,0.00032187373,0.00015039498,0.004667079,0.9810787,0.00016453612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000682002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005608864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9206513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001935521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010314405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402016286","doi":"10.1136/jme-2024-110137","title":"Providing medically assisted dying in Canada: a qualitative study of emotional and moral impact","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.34872899301070304,"score_gpt":0.5587180846129748,"score_spread":0.20998909160227175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402016286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9816509,0.004047128,0.00036348606,0.01346885,0.0002564859,0.00010499828,0.000006750092,0.0000034790621,0.00009796059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99816924,0.0008359248,0.0005291223,0.00028451433,0.00016101224,0.00000103911,0.000001985147,0.000008075092,0.000009083116],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99476916,0.0005045793,0.0008998808,0.00011115579,0.0035648795,0.00015032208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947136,0.0040636305,0.00026531695,0.00006498084,0.0005491086,0.00034336088],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00631953,0.00010622861,0.00058673654,0.00021074276,0.000021116954,0.000007751432,0.00011254368,0.00024495958,0.00009787086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014609993,0.00006938003,0.00007807749,0.00029621983,0.0001675239,0.00007452246,0.00004320706,0.0024602043,1.6220639e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011696243,0.0014831641,0.19091822,0.0048884526,0.0023971454,0.009026083,0.7531867,0.0000540673,0.0009630663,0.0017141191,0.0035160626,0.030683283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012962404,0.0074620307,0.24009673,0.06921241,0.00079230015,0.0014038464,0.6558455,0.008095212,0.00040380383,0.0019788847,0.001336486,0.00041034844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15590857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17843649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09734117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003889366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015491083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402354318","doi":"10.1136/jme-2024-110402","title":"Stoking fears of AI X-Risk (while forgetting justice here and now)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Forgetting; Economic Justice; Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Computer security; Law; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.07465097264006242,"score_gpt":0.45696875641132273,"score_spread":0.3823177837712603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402354318","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22832341,0.01271755,0.0057700975,0.7327423,0.0045067742,0.00013933617,0.000012820393,0.000051070205,0.0157366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97756475,0.017434247,0.0005502116,0.0028914302,0.0014254244,2.1918913e-7,1.79542e-7,0.000010815546,0.0001227189],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950375,0.00059714384,0.00048260295,0.00009899246,0.0035395513,0.00024420078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924437,0.0058442387,0.00027687883,0.00006254578,0.0009401653,0.0004324693],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027616175,0.00007903039,0.00025449766,0.000088323926,0.00050353963,0.00020270968,0.000316447,0.0010239218,0.000111073736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045874137,0.00006382426,0.00012167312,0.00024646186,0.00078837,0.00037270715,0.00007098715,0.006667257,0.0000025207771],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004273243,0.00012983552,0.00238536,0.0015351505,0.0003140152,0.00046333697,0.34864146,0.000035133566,0.00012445431,0.54856354,0.014478524,0.083286494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012457469,0.0007407842,0.0013493792,0.009073321,0.0009794049,0.0001130909,0.1636148,0.002294657,0.0001205782,0.3681476,0.45178947,0.0005311843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089857273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015249541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74924135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006255167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00411096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405529025","doi":"10.1136/jme-2024-110392","title":"Navigating the consent river: questions to consider before waiving consent requirements in pragmatic cluster randomised trials","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"London Health Sciences Centre; Western University; Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Eli Lilly and Company","keywords":"Waiver; Informed consent; Cluster randomised controlled trial; Cluster (spacecraft); Research ethics; Intervention (counseling); Clinical trial; Research design; Psychology; Family medicine; Randomized controlled trial; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Medical education; Computer science; Political science; Law; Psychiatry; Sociology; Surgery; Pathology","score_opus":0.5627502535127855,"score_gpt":0.6459479293291469,"score_spread":0.0831976758163614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405529025","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16086182,0.001966915,0.0046151495,0.82872796,0.0019227193,0.0013243014,0.000006852773,0.000027864156,0.0005464005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95780516,0.0055481927,0.0043395795,0.030499278,0.0013399717,0.00003938082,0.0000028398142,0.00003811629,0.0003875111],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.979519,0.0054050037,0.003898307,0.000318845,0.010353577,0.00050526106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.26019838,0.7325692,0.0011036168,0.0007778212,0.0035093692,0.0018415622],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.21597078,0.00019102977,0.0010608714,0.00015941219,0.00016938278,0.00013554217,0.00046157412,0.0014251499,0.00064318255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.82956946,0.00010481838,0.00043146263,0.00044209816,0.0012039992,0.00009037042,0.0002877624,0.026891243,0.000053178144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.024041804,0.0041477922,0.017149981,0.040600073,0.0077742124,0.033611298,0.29879364,0.00083400024,0.0035308667,0.32009962,0.12207676,0.12733994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.094197005,0.0034087007,0.0029912419,0.4137632,0.0019707829,0.006191062,0.01589021,0.011876542,0.00047729665,0.42871404,0.01976791,0.0007520334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022926021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024148545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7982287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003030202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019999448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405740408","doi":"10.1136/jme-2024-110640","title":"Is framing of treatment options misleading? Maybe, but not because of a lower-bound reading","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Framing effect; Duty; Empirical research; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.47341711100618095,"score_gpt":0.5106760104424345,"score_spread":0.037258899436253545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405740408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6947299,0.012384835,0.014713152,0.2717136,0.0039177756,0.0003384379,0.00043444388,0.000028565451,0.0017392721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97994345,0.0073325885,0.0044196155,0.006323701,0.0010226226,0.000007681001,0.0000048726,0.000036595295,0.00090884377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931188,0.00032815532,0.0053244047,0.00026120397,0.00069327705,0.00027410983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902641,0.006219212,0.0025583236,0.00030332856,0.00029626043,0.00035875186],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.037829228,0.00016595479,0.0011800287,0.0005732685,0.00010689417,0.000063497835,0.00037361708,0.00074452074,0.0010345409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018663762,0.00016680079,0.00037919107,0.00025455054,0.00024591206,0.00030907916,0.000046890396,0.0013836653,0.00013943616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020752693,0.0013176076,0.005204309,0.010423214,0.0028418049,0.00023272847,0.093583986,0.0006033884,0.00046646458,0.8305977,0.049991865,0.0045294208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0077061728,0.0066939695,0.005589756,0.024935456,0.0006547616,0.0011583433,0.02120009,0.086131275,0.0025379444,0.123294875,0.7183256,0.001771729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00088398217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000060271566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7073028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007523381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024764054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406235228","doi":"10.1136/jme-2024-110373","title":"Liberalism and mitochondrial replacement technique","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Harm; Liberalism; Criticism; Narrative; Psychological intervention; Offspring; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Politics; Biology; Genetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.041932220628554076,"score_gpt":0.4191960703829565,"score_spread":0.3772638497544024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406235228","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078899354,0.004818087,0.01646575,0.89374024,0.001929316,0.00051387545,6.5523216e-7,0.000070071546,0.0035626784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7828681,0.039261084,0.10010253,0.069013484,0.0042362306,0.00006897228,0.0000034626212,0.00003993345,0.0044062287],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784076,0.00009349631,0.00047875367,0.00013084781,0.0013024905,0.00015362422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985095,0.00045775683,0.00016461722,0.00019807262,0.00045260676,0.00021740652],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041228356,0.000074090036,0.00029445978,0.00019166888,0.000059373044,0.000009989034,0.00012530216,0.00085367373,0.000050077928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02232386,0.000049522336,0.00005809315,0.00016741284,0.0002858469,0.000037529433,0.000081898375,0.0037256093,9.629248e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008492637,0.0015525306,0.018472701,0.007215836,0.00092627306,0.0025651457,0.003032428,0.0000013304115,0.016973404,0.3539506,0.39503998,0.19177715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0073399786,0.002827762,0.006634482,0.0054704533,0.00023443854,0.0038014692,0.0006598301,0.000031717995,0.031092042,0.08099749,0.8607265,0.00018386068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016062519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000033613653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8247267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005918589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023380772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409263429","doi":"10.1136/jme-2025-110936","title":"Asymmetry endures: a response to Holt","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Obligation; Scope (computer science); Moral obligation; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Pregnancy; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05566496825447049,"score_gpt":0.48758576224296707,"score_spread":0.4319207939884966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409263429","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08411232,0.0035071282,0.005124161,0.8987296,0.0023499255,0.0001737149,0.000006377759,0.000024342213,0.0059724073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8793812,0.0034467203,0.0036358053,0.109872855,0.0016157827,0.0000024343087,0.0000010572552,0.000014746375,0.0020293891],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993476,0.00074081385,0.0009114791,0.00016200212,0.004416588,0.00029316032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99012,0.0064777164,0.00019751467,0.00031372107,0.0017414385,0.0011496046],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02691998,0.0001281455,0.00049216003,0.0005138426,0.00011000019,0.000027507383,0.00039683035,0.0018275037,0.00023520521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12337223,0.00009408231,0.00019655173,0.00075410056,0.00016348397,0.000046042565,0.0001254724,0.011157666,0.000026405733],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.025457479,0.002145668,0.017446617,0.007902351,0.0014336994,0.019766856,0.043659218,0.00002057025,0.0018318254,0.1688589,0.57204086,0.13943598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002067283,0.00124214,0.0061728125,0.0030747275,0.00017464059,0.000532864,0.0011415485,0.000039698658,0.00023858635,0.002980115,0.9822192,0.00011639163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009182465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028612278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7952689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016720564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012856247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410143210","doi":"10.1136/jme-2024-110518","title":"Conduit or conductor? Physician providers’ descriptions of their role as MAiD assessors in the first years after legalisation in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Autonomy; Thematic analysis; Context (archaeology); Statutory law; Focus group; Judgement; Psychology; Qualitative research; Nursing; Social psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.1542521337266334,"score_gpt":0.4316492281370595,"score_spread":0.27739709441042615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410143210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9530456,0.0012385303,0.00003977869,0.04446171,0.00026291795,0.00012852967,0.000006644464,0.000001509308,0.000814778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903434,0.000717573,0.00007868302,0.008719767,0.00008251513,0.000004857164,0.000002316235,0.000004628289,0.000046270303],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977736,0.0002167513,0.00055485056,0.000073762116,0.0012550171,0.00012604163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790806,0.00136499,0.00022291816,0.000119376244,0.00031258614,0.00007205116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019155103,0.000080216625,0.00035139563,0.00013611134,0.000017366947,0.000007950802,0.00019719567,0.00022520653,0.00009060283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003737022,0.000047711746,0.00006851817,0.00032903362,0.00016022501,0.00009673304,0.000021928558,0.0016261801,4.977896e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033518511,0.0019029763,0.6136852,0.0034352716,0.00102939,0.0036885424,0.29295686,0.00019059543,0.0024636674,0.017018575,0.036635693,0.023641363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008153149,0.0008890425,0.45955572,0.024816724,0.00033121763,0.00010370923,0.22934364,0.00046371334,0.004898989,0.005299567,0.26585332,0.00029121095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26343971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74043983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4770001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002567702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009428216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411224477","doi":"10.1136/jme-2024-110192","title":"Physicians’ preferences for their own end of life: a comparison across North America, Europe, and Australia","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"Vrije Universiteit Brussel; Universiteit Gent","keywords":"Palliative care; End-of-life care; Family medicine; Medicine; Demographics; Physician assisted suicide; Advance care planning; Gerontology; Demography; Nursing","score_opus":0.27807470298715364,"score_gpt":0.5102665190336279,"score_spread":0.2321918160464742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411224477","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97937745,0.0040360796,0.004171448,0.01165752,0.0003364683,0.0001169042,0.00005284251,0.0000049300984,0.00024635385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98997504,0.0064114397,0.0016059435,0.001586906,0.0002605926,0.00000166215,0.0000073775373,0.000005773152,0.00014524077],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997914,0.00012377757,0.0006867995,0.000101723315,0.0010116164,0.00016206427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961806,0.0019491016,0.0005323719,0.000105137166,0.0010455588,0.00018723596],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012158331,0.000110895744,0.0007193486,0.00006214712,0.000042235628,0.000008888796,0.00020023028,0.00026391502,0.000034773064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008648475,0.000071493305,0.000120568075,0.0002496862,0.00065910333,0.00004714822,0.00005179874,0.0013541533,5.698344e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022094643,0.0012203048,0.7107779,0.0053523323,0.001779779,0.000050013183,0.055684883,0.000040680778,0.0013278339,0.0013935828,0.036736306,0.18342692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008750343,0.004374899,0.28927323,0.01892183,0.00078651856,0.0000241476,0.023264589,0.00084159547,0.0090805525,0.0013420014,0.64300585,0.00033446983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011502157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019284202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60626954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012873578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008823096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412401888","doi":"10.1136/jme-2025-110950","title":"Do vaccine mandates impair the voluntariness of informed consent?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Western University","funders":"Institute of Population and Public Health","keywords":"Voluntariness; Coercion (linguistics); Informed consent; Obligation; Undue influence; Psychology; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Medicine; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.12847884036830975,"score_gpt":0.5697056641372943,"score_spread":0.44122682376898453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412401888","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06481087,0.0018963533,0.006077303,0.8913852,0.007433808,0.00042414287,0.000006640534,0.000028851457,0.027936835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89910793,0.017736057,0.0013532889,0.078744635,0.0013292513,0.0000115047715,0.0000033086312,0.00001999759,0.001693992],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98834914,0.0043480136,0.0021660428,0.00012360356,0.0046231034,0.00039010204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76039696,0.2330916,0.001925896,0.0005376131,0.0035781965,0.00046974607],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0661885,0.00014648208,0.00054874783,0.00017684064,0.00073571585,0.000013406824,0.0012368772,0.002039377,0.0022652566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.49271432,0.00007996931,0.00015148638,0.00046832234,0.0007456869,0.00016691192,0.00049625733,0.03511534,0.000032576314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013712728,0.0004888228,0.07011262,0.008578916,0.0007575648,0.00019266373,0.027805075,0.000012673165,0.00007105703,0.41382283,0.46722886,0.009557638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007827039,0.00042118278,0.028626626,0.01771894,0.0004911007,0.00015910283,0.035338562,0.00029560959,0.000112282454,0.22236405,0.68639994,0.00024558636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005002364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021069993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83429706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014197465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025438055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413141007","doi":"10.1136/jme-2024-110629","title":"A large exploratory survey of electroconvulsive therapy recipients, family members and friends: what information do they recall being given?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Traffic Injury Research Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Snowball sampling; Recall; Electroconvulsive therapy; Psychology; Misinformation; Psychiatry; Representativeness heuristic; Medicine; Clinical psychology; Social psychology; Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming); Cognitive psychology; Law","score_opus":0.03448629507609149,"score_gpt":0.3540437906473304,"score_spread":0.3195574955712389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413141007","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94592696,0.0241754,0.0019298404,0.025767792,0.0008276761,0.0004552965,0.000009114047,0.000022459617,0.0008854612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8514912,0.13858755,0.00014746819,0.009616174,0.000099592246,0.000011497238,0.000009157947,0.000013096072,0.00002427799],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995363,0.000793543,0.0010923734,0.0001471309,0.0022629166,0.00034103877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934889,0.0024848667,0.0007077,0.00020314116,0.0028671606,0.0002482208],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011683573,0.00021210026,0.0007587532,0.0003999403,0.0001386896,0.000053452113,0.00026633468,0.00063966215,0.00004409671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0078057866,0.00015479505,0.00013110587,0.00042539876,0.00023109534,0.0007543299,0.000086746346,0.0032148184,0.0000015744392],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.031026773,0.003242783,0.16155073,0.003357654,0.014962171,0.00049409596,0.373834,0.000010320508,0.027525384,0.037680954,0.032503366,0.31381175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.084577985,0.022016624,0.47868565,0.035502322,0.001684523,0.00072798424,0.12314476,0.00046408872,0.04317248,0.037548404,0.17055133,0.0019238727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006749279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016124827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31713492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000139817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020158058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99908483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414188918","doi":"10.1136/jme-2025-110961","title":"Harms of the current global anti-FGM campaign","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; Université de Montréal; University of Toronto","funders":"Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd; Vetenskapsrådet","keywords":"Ethnocentrism; Human rights; Multiculturalism; Unintended consequences; Expansive; Cultural diversity; Racism; Female circumcision; Profiling (computer programming)","score_opus":0.05217243562505404,"score_gpt":0.4344294321854156,"score_spread":0.38225699656036155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414188918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70777,0.0108812805,0.0066735167,0.26243338,0.0068682376,0.0003024588,0.000011311479,0.000027044232,0.0050327913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960626,0.0005472683,0.00059260754,0.0022338983,0.0004335461,4.8868253e-7,6.840625e-7,0.000004837251,0.00012410835],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957425,0.00021037304,0.00073825225,0.00009201587,0.0030602803,0.00015658548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99763495,0.0006703993,0.0003867341,0.0002233296,0.00088454515,0.0002000207],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038709063,0.0000992368,0.00037089773,0.000067315465,0.000065390705,0.000011393536,0.00038933882,0.0003988207,0.00011993374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019541321,0.00005678329,0.00022677034,0.00042846747,0.00037365864,0.000042533244,0.0001258303,0.0031023603,0.0000055307264],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000795406,0.0024750377,0.5814303,0.0067796833,0.0010456899,0.0004457758,0.00860397,0.00017582186,0.001502654,0.049339768,0.076913886,0.27049202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0077409265,0.00086247496,0.74074686,0.020632003,0.001516492,0.0012040584,0.0018517383,0.0017362343,0.007163812,0.02402785,0.19217159,0.0003459857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016591317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010694739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2882926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009927004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036147626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99919754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416435851","doi":"10.1136/jme-2025-111481","title":"On the death of intention and the dehumanisation of medicine: an Islamic ethical reflection","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medical Ethics","topic":"Torture, Ethics, and Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Dehumanization; Agency (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Compassion; Islam; Medical ethics; Adjudication; Moral agency; Power (physics); Moral disengagement","score_opus":0.1025846535814129,"score_gpt":0.45800168704081357,"score_spread":0.3554170334594007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416435851","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.094500124,0.00057844067,0.012343715,0.8677657,0.0018038352,0.00018686606,6.88555e-7,0.000009776902,0.022810848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98833895,0.002418559,0.000048641155,0.008744173,0.00033890022,8.213916e-7,3.60532e-7,0.0000026198184,0.00010696449],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940937,0.0025382943,0.00055871654,0.00007638501,0.0026380233,0.00009484485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99048316,0.008067389,0.0004736851,0.00011173036,0.0008032253,0.000060792423],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.039813392,0.00005990734,0.00022578501,0.000080639584,0.0003588397,0.000017069035,0.0003431146,0.0010645373,0.00010431765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04670847,0.000028800197,0.00007765944,0.00015396818,0.0036147314,0.0000672929,0.000026285854,0.004753149,2.1692234e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001366576,0.000030839576,0.00006903049,0.000036045116,0.000028186992,9.086304e-7,0.032617547,0.0000025012805,0.00008167874,0.9646294,0.0004497706,0.0019174514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011633578,0.00034195994,0.0015098396,0.000875851,0.00010105922,0.0000062867507,0.01434975,0.00027108841,0.00011616997,0.9747638,0.0064622546,0.000038562455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018769965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004328308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8938388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004951386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011114009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}