{"meta":{"query_hash":"99ea5c527522","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis"},"cohort_total":37,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":37,"exported":37,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/99ea5c527522","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Multi-Criteria+Decision+Analysis"},"results":[{"id":"W1524885984","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1507","title":"A Multi‐Criteria Classification Approach for Identifying Favourable Climates for Tourism","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"ELECTRE; Tourism; Computer science; Cru; Index (typography); Compensation (psychology); Decision maker; Operations research; Econometrics; Composite index; Data mining; Statistics; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Mathematics; Geography; Composite indicator; Psychology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.18418688068915406,"score_gpt":0.45702674067266946,"score_spread":0.2728398599835154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1524885984","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12986231,0.0010833583,0.85459495,0.0011915668,0.00014979237,0.0013900212,0.0010514277,0.00022276319,0.010453837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5642836,0.00019966628,0.4330783,0.000117354015,0.00007438597,0.0007760978,0.00046604895,0.000022510192,0.0009820765],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98952687,0.0052010845,0.00090295187,0.0007366548,0.0031712316,0.00046119696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988191,0.006873263,0.0010962884,0.00029923453,0.003013546,0.0005266166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009714131,0.0011636711,0.0010682513,0.010443155,0.0013959815,0.003530833,0.0016653998,0.001266603,0.0032618386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015371127,0.0003451339,0.0016891436,0.0062258076,0.0010145352,0.0012996583,0.0018488307,0.0013758123,0.00028660477],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00083492766,0.001126049,0.039886158,0.0017141008,0.0012589141,0.0006936738,0.0028062565,0.4179993,0.0071551423,0.038829453,0.008232346,0.47946373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007686897,0.00039958226,0.010962278,0.00020184617,0.00015139322,0.000120592245,0.0012077276,0.95022154,0.0014611484,0.031722035,0.003378133,0.00009687096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058134077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005641513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010443155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031725743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002440823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05137384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1574453507","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1479","title":"A Comprehensive Literature Review of the Rank Reversal Phenomenon in the Analytic Hierarchy Process","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Rank (graph theory); Hierarchy; Computer science; Order (exchange); Compromise; Operations research; Process (computing); Management science; Phenomenon; Data science; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Mathematics; Engineering; Social science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.1312149065278208,"score_gpt":0.46536447086928484,"score_spread":0.33414956434146403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1574453507","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009957573,0.9904321,0.004176614,0.0013097032,0.00030147482,0.000038475922,0.000040748233,0.0000179674,0.002687144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02253403,0.967747,0.008177688,0.00062898936,0.000354214,0.0000707476,0.00008095264,0.000009377938,0.0003971231],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.99136984,0.003942528,0.0010698893,0.0005515033,0.0028995702,0.0001666261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9636865,0.027297137,0.002340089,0.0005200168,0.0059318077,0.00022436293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010593019,0.00094900554,0.0018567983,0.014205341,0.0010165181,0.003582212,0.0014589311,0.00174005,0.0030120697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027249284,0.0005716264,0.0012442536,0.023318972,0.0014360407,0.003407684,0.00096392335,0.0014087664,0.0007877057],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000791282,0.0000678094,0.0011610424,0.059836354,0.00031714246,0.00030634963,0.00066073687,0.0018727276,0.0006402127,0.017790103,0.01483349,0.902435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007009925,0.0005313518,0.012314441,0.23734063,0.0021162713,0.0021802622,0.0046795025,0.0073123197,0.0032075816,0.04387735,0.68611974,0.00025053878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033595804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004170169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014205341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002431144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006511783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05602187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1870952394","doi":"10.1002/mcda.490","title":"Compression of Project Schedules using the Analytical Hierarchy Process","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Schedule; Analytic hierarchy process; Computer science; Harmony search; Operations research; Process (computing); Heuristic; Procurement; Risk analysis (engineering); Industrial engineering; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.38960638530079117,"score_gpt":0.5028744321261565,"score_spread":0.11326804682536529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1870952394","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006648133,0.00013620693,0.99109495,0.00008182644,0.000023428647,0.00023849339,0.00004027033,0.00017666741,0.0015600387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14735423,0.00031438854,0.8502829,0.000034794844,0.000053024793,0.00055736984,0.00017490867,0.00006766889,0.001160735],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99165994,0.0030869406,0.000429454,0.0004193657,0.004173489,0.00023086395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99331397,0.0042316807,0.0006218033,0.00043642934,0.0012304058,0.00016569011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071118837,0.0009328866,0.0012585861,0.003711951,0.00083163596,0.0016082037,0.001157848,0.0004884725,0.002838103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015464533,0.0005802513,0.0009858866,0.0030205015,0.0008484688,0.0016018639,0.0016370416,0.0013173054,0.0003961231],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013965204,0.00013600755,0.0006777739,0.00033846582,0.00009319907,0.00011986404,0.00077677675,0.5910963,0.0033222933,0.03177087,0.001449289,0.3700795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047962254,0.00014160042,0.00036465042,0.00007222083,0.000027755508,0.00004375934,0.00014112734,0.9739837,0.0018796813,0.018981097,0.004290805,0.000025521582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049093035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037821806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071118837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019652906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028723641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037611663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1902275675","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1516","title":"Multicriteria Optimization of A Long‐Haul Routing and Scheduling Problem","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"HEC Montréal","keywords":"Tabu search; Scheduling (production processes); Truck; Vehicle routing problem; Computer science; Operations research; Economic shortage; Routing (electronic design automation); Job shop scheduling; Transport engineering; Engineering; Operations management; Computer network; Automotive engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.020336022246136443,"score_gpt":0.3098093942348946,"score_spread":0.28947337198875817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1902275675","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4111441,0.0019651055,0.5638556,0.0018445499,0.00021310999,0.00038706054,0.00080600363,0.00024176558,0.019542664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9062351,0.00042510525,0.08638477,0.0001293184,0.00007873663,0.00027219413,0.00031036933,0.00005803001,0.006106303],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988777,0.00065522327,0.000038967595,0.00017669842,0.00009689045,0.0001544727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704367,0.002295051,0.0002913506,0.0000603767,0.00015954359,0.00015001635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00248465,0.0013874137,0.0013943007,0.001054913,0.0006915478,0.0019504757,0.0013944183,0.0022493182,0.0038768784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004606574,0.00073920225,0.0010493151,0.0013998789,0.00095457205,0.0011986397,0.0010966298,0.001148337,0.00026058513],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058008955,0.000048591544,0.00035433273,0.000047575915,0.000032022148,0.00009038246,0.000020277055,0.9925835,0.00018820426,0.003216881,0.00037205513,0.002988209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018392075,0.000039584495,0.00015944809,0.0000062698155,0.000008732598,0.000019397614,0.00002375424,0.99752873,0.00010857198,0.0018620458,0.00022057748,0.0000043940254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0092227375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053602518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0092227375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018330825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012893068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018338144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1905923734","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1466","title":"The Stochastic Goal Programming Model: Theory and Applications","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Optimization and Mathematical Programming","field":"Engineering","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Computer science; Decision maker; Stochastic programming; Operations research; Goal programming; Stochastic modelling; Management science; Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.018157295886323775,"score_gpt":0.30989797519897205,"score_spread":0.2917406793126483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1905923734","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0091107115,0.002722054,0.9665442,0.0024282169,0.00009884614,0.000042961034,0.000106915984,0.00008743046,0.018858625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7122547,0.0069373315,0.2652855,0.0009569272,0.0006363045,0.00046909915,0.0003428032,0.000113783106,0.01300359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978636,0.0012151289,0.000078397476,0.00025182738,0.00047369045,0.00011734605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966101,0.002559013,0.0002547135,0.00009351308,0.00034402474,0.0001385959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025772622,0.00085392804,0.0009951565,0.0011935004,0.00047441546,0.0024460347,0.0012970521,0.0017839405,0.003479611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056335656,0.0004257328,0.0010632733,0.0023238931,0.0020581256,0.0016257578,0.002132977,0.0029928046,0.00047432157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001800761,0.000056554327,0.00035711337,0.0001237552,0.00004715045,0.00013001659,0.000097799704,0.19825314,0.00019512871,0.7787836,0.0023197313,0.019617967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009174071,0.00002115038,0.00010333823,0.00003938007,0.000010768459,0.00003807664,0.000025971434,0.58290416,0.00005367455,0.41303968,0.0037423647,0.000012188481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003916044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019412846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003916044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014909201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015243283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013630033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963653143","doi":"10.1002/mcda.458","title":"An imprecise goal programming approach for modeling design team's preferences in quality function deployment planning process","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Quality Function Deployment in Product Design","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Quality function deployment; Benchmarking; Product planning; New product development; Computer science; Customer satisfaction; Process (computing); Product design; Quality (philosophy); Product (mathematics); House of Quality; Function (biology); Voice of the customer; Process management; Industrial engineering; Systems engineering; Engineering; Service quality; Business; Marketing; Mathematics","score_opus":0.12243436151581598,"score_gpt":0.3834596720475741,"score_spread":0.2610253105317581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963653143","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019730277,0.00009367873,0.9771697,0.00021464756,0.000011855813,0.000105569685,0.0000771673,0.000068862704,0.0025282898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49457178,0.00024905405,0.5017052,0.00012749145,0.000022988404,0.0008465774,0.00020965513,0.00005982572,0.00220741],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939785,0.004241516,0.00018716676,0.00051852467,0.00070677034,0.00036741458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926609,0.0056662792,0.00065944367,0.00018095641,0.0006307506,0.0002017002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00937169,0.0017299957,0.0012821356,0.0020935414,0.0008072274,0.003006795,0.002320664,0.001624711,0.0025592344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012164977,0.0015062403,0.0018041716,0.002213039,0.0018412408,0.002163908,0.0017432551,0.0024459288,0.00029974463],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003382155,0.000028557055,0.00038131545,0.000038839073,0.000030720956,0.000051454885,0.00018045068,0.97826546,0.0001536581,0.015750555,0.000102232516,0.004982876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010471813,0.000025180321,0.00009293323,0.000012799768,0.000011742681,0.000007669618,0.000046379908,0.99016505,0.00008303197,0.009274457,0.0002630991,0.0000071075915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0132450275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010736474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0132450275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003910486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023164041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04956281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965923524","doi":"10.1002/mcda.429","title":"Sharing the pie and distributing the reward: a case of bonus distribution among executives","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Financial Reporting and Valuation Research","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Distribution (mathematics); Reward system; Business; Marketing; Psychology; Mathematics; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.0682736100851087,"score_gpt":0.3485584610955955,"score_spread":0.28028485101048684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965923524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70552456,0.00025500974,0.23087656,0.0047834697,0.00013071261,0.0007382898,0.00015117374,0.00012123449,0.057418924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9735571,0.000056288434,0.022344569,0.000062887535,0.000027689483,0.00014952171,0.0000142830695,0.000011364825,0.0037762423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847996,0.009346873,0.0004242351,0.0006198262,0.0022329283,0.0025764543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9791499,0.013373119,0.0013951232,0.0021545568,0.0017401827,0.0021871175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02135805,0.0012151067,0.0010886146,0.002324394,0.0044241818,0.0042496063,0.002137962,0.0037332699,0.0077296034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026520122,0.0005984306,0.0012561573,0.0024967978,0.0041729603,0.0037546824,0.0045976136,0.0021726142,0.00063919264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022301136,0.0010137471,0.012696734,0.0002970002,0.00022081852,0.008510959,0.0068504713,0.40566623,0.004354952,0.46571368,0.0039764624,0.08846884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004886328,0.0009278415,0.005018194,0.00016983617,0.00011888882,0.0014861443,0.0052313525,0.7651162,0.0037157133,0.20732914,0.010198421,0.00019966261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058989935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004695822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02135805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00417543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033842626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11295354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968534991","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1530","title":"Decision Support System and Multi‐Criteria Decision Aid: A State of the Art and Perspectives","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Decision support system; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Decision analysis; R-CAST; Analytic hierarchy process; Computer science; Business decision mapping; Decision engineering; Management science; Evidential reasoning approach; Field (mathematics); Decision problem; Intelligent decision support system; Decision process; Hierarchy; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0863205887052104,"score_gpt":0.40305137990215256,"score_spread":0.31673079119694214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968534991","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013314061,0.72238356,0.17119573,0.020425407,0.0012738397,0.00012000514,0.00012706245,0.00017993116,0.07098044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50070214,0.3200964,0.16476043,0.0033462113,0.0029110508,0.00018160176,0.00020745587,0.000059944596,0.007734835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99105257,0.005388541,0.00043964788,0.00056155934,0.0022669272,0.00029081546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98700804,0.009896432,0.0004986693,0.0003582437,0.001862467,0.0003761856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009846717,0.00076432404,0.0012068168,0.0051376414,0.001027681,0.009008408,0.0018704836,0.003962016,0.005228264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077028535,0.00037637947,0.0007439549,0.007526504,0.0037708678,0.005076512,0.0022369055,0.0026311423,0.0010182521],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012986275,0.00026138348,0.0019044084,0.005089647,0.00012083974,0.00046973975,0.0010586012,0.012520249,0.000902167,0.5798619,0.00728923,0.39039192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047670652,0.0003977769,0.0028304246,0.009172973,0.00009578957,0.0010865115,0.0044446313,0.08359479,0.002453957,0.49428594,0.4013777,0.00021171333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021101045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010863537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009846717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027453445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027124214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05207503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969404925","doi":"10.1002/mcda.451","title":"Who won the Winter 2010 Olympics? A quest into priorities and rankings","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Sports Performance and Training","field":"Medicine","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medal; Gold medal; Analytic hierarchy process; Bronze; Order (exchange); Value (mathematics); Political science; Operations research; History; Mathematics; Art history; Ancient history; Economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.019246796687092966,"score_gpt":0.33727094778018046,"score_spread":0.3180241510930875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969404925","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67655927,0.009359999,0.08931574,0.10611721,0.0010684032,0.0006288724,0.0014536789,0.00012894889,0.11536787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97726005,0.0012265735,0.019309534,0.00043944435,0.00011797923,0.00008107009,0.00017950474,0.000015726004,0.0013700549],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98233366,0.012562272,0.00095892505,0.00039142612,0.0029171482,0.000836556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761268,0.0102376975,0.0022922717,0.00032018748,0.008211528,0.002811604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023124635,0.00050166226,0.0007223685,0.0068172105,0.0024043908,0.0131690195,0.0010940472,0.0010740504,0.0025315075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04208542,0.0003283231,0.00028054084,0.007181501,0.0031095669,0.005212174,0.0021309846,0.0018887224,0.00040898047],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007487503,0.00035785406,0.14477895,0.0013940362,0.00032861877,0.00042267938,0.021850167,0.00982421,0.0011153475,0.29399014,0.052472707,0.4727165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001696905,0.0007814529,0.08423319,0.0022355749,0.0001862916,0.00037207524,0.28485423,0.06825006,0.001911328,0.50149184,0.05517135,0.0003429307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015764343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029511765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023124635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005924505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00828396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.122296214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996400852","doi":"10.1002/mcda.447","title":"Decision‐maker's preferences modelling within the goal‐programming model: a new typology","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Optimization and Mathematical Programming","field":"Engineering","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Decision maker; Goal programming; Preference; Computer science; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Management science; Machine learning; Economics; Mathematics; Microeconomics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04376550800103314,"score_gpt":0.3173666911509759,"score_spread":0.27360118314994275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996400852","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019537244,0.0011671364,0.95246243,0.002164716,0.00016876173,0.00009467875,0.00019089099,0.00010270717,0.024111513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65732217,0.0021452168,0.3332923,0.0005180736,0.00030692623,0.0006430386,0.00029574387,0.00011477858,0.005361807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948078,0.0032658356,0.00025659177,0.00050513126,0.00090140116,0.00026319397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960233,0.0023834158,0.000467558,0.00039602251,0.0004932943,0.0002363585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040652407,0.0010393962,0.0009206697,0.0019932997,0.00064439944,0.0056834198,0.0021603198,0.0020768938,0.0032838115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005696563,0.0004076275,0.0014454845,0.0034135396,0.0026306603,0.005143148,0.0021098754,0.0028457632,0.0005010525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057982223,0.0000772689,0.0009751783,0.00020511872,0.00008432035,0.00020439972,0.00053882593,0.06895787,0.0005537049,0.8983907,0.0021098542,0.027844867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033256743,0.000058255067,0.0003826939,0.00014569788,0.00003808681,0.00017612138,0.0004022374,0.41328913,0.00041844283,0.5712386,0.013767065,0.00005038297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00120625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000868736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056834198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015441998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011348012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021499336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010464579","doi":"10.1002/mcda.376","title":"Multi‐criteria optimization of ball passing in simulated soccer","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Robotic Path Planning Algorithms","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Ball (mathematics); Heuristics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Heuristic; Set (abstract data type); Mathematics","score_opus":0.042362986144107,"score_gpt":0.3556786528163569,"score_spread":0.3133156666722499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010464579","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45806178,0.0005193473,0.53277314,0.00039771615,0.000082280654,0.00039928305,0.00016173994,0.0003575094,0.007247185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767744,0.000057507797,0.021880269,0.000032905176,0.0000059671634,0.00012905599,0.00007139231,0.000019494539,0.001029116],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985702,0.00086740596,0.000062592575,0.00012695254,0.00017110757,0.00020174708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948053,0.0035403701,0.0005074865,0.00012435728,0.00060104864,0.00042155027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037740704,0.0013849232,0.0019065376,0.0012534908,0.00065702747,0.0014445776,0.0011840691,0.0015266264,0.0027655805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006053082,0.00097590266,0.001040665,0.00070934754,0.0013244502,0.0006673323,0.0012123563,0.0009428993,0.00020215951],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005480328,0.000018972534,0.00016461057,0.0000143318775,0.000011652245,0.000012118533,0.000008720946,0.998192,0.000118210606,0.00026773522,0.00003152744,0.0011054146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011995688,0.000047257323,0.00007622135,0.0000037130512,0.0000033275578,0.0000014877999,0.0000066317907,0.99944216,0.00010309602,0.00026120295,0.000040540854,0.0000023487814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018654224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006481842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018654224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018445617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016101941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037091315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066316339","doi":"10.1002/mcda.448","title":"Fuzzy goal programming model: an overview of the current state‐of‐the art","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Optimization and Mathematical Programming","field":"Engineering","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Goal programming; Decision maker; Computer science; Fuzzy logic; State (computer science); Operations research; Management science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Engineering; Programming language","score_opus":0.05753464246591396,"score_gpt":0.36068800222586256,"score_spread":0.3031533597599486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066316339","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075622303,0.13039586,0.82174927,0.004408299,0.0002987392,0.00015742645,0.00029084482,0.0003886908,0.0347487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31637335,0.20272075,0.4658593,0.0018596934,0.0012620675,0.00066797185,0.00086973433,0.00024191194,0.0101451855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811304,0.0007683148,0.00010483241,0.0002576504,0.00065484655,0.0001013505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987785,0.000847457,0.000076291784,0.000048782524,0.00019036539,0.000058529648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029365947,0.0010539648,0.0014788925,0.001961091,0.00041670617,0.004756394,0.002624788,0.002089146,0.003400818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032054514,0.0005538453,0.0013592255,0.0043060905,0.0012299288,0.0029929327,0.0012717383,0.0025661502,0.0009983872],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011247422,0.00024297142,0.0006318728,0.0022698846,0.00018008072,0.00027174968,0.00031218652,0.21121319,0.0006067182,0.4375516,0.009550751,0.33705652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003400758,0.00009479823,0.00037422698,0.001090695,0.000084770676,0.00023730466,0.0001823009,0.5717631,0.0004657912,0.34901533,0.07658212,0.00007554833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004363631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017149273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004756394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001946595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019029441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015530407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075451845","doi":"10.1002/mcda.334","title":"A multi‐criterion approach for selecting attractive portfolio","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Financial Markets and Investment Strategies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Solvency; Portfolio; Market liquidity; Modern portfolio theory; Stock (firearms); Stock market; Financial market; Economics; Actuarial science; Econometrics; Financial economics; Computer science; Finance; Engineering","score_opus":0.10755791284026103,"score_gpt":0.3041591330269225,"score_spread":0.19660122018666146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075451845","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020964568,0.00076646596,0.9733462,0.00035718974,0.000044843713,0.00022510668,0.00005223956,0.0001036153,0.0041398006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47702,0.0003707359,0.5188353,0.00021081905,0.0001409571,0.00061175134,0.00021453203,0.000075783806,0.0025201126],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99307114,0.0036004707,0.0003697318,0.00043184104,0.0021929871,0.00033388328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99124485,0.005226482,0.00064011896,0.0001773605,0.002268366,0.00044276763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008632793,0.0015321311,0.002512062,0.0062048044,0.0009169202,0.0027669522,0.0018823668,0.0020269742,0.00412084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013026203,0.0007013438,0.0013576729,0.0025391479,0.001067682,0.0012067943,0.0016963135,0.0011346688,0.0005489233],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025048724,0.0003741397,0.0024483725,0.0004799218,0.00046268915,0.00045983642,0.00020329928,0.7645626,0.003201661,0.038255826,0.0030253497,0.18627588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026952779,0.00012535897,0.00041060257,0.000050803294,0.00003226936,0.000047072826,0.000027766611,0.98717797,0.0003815058,0.010893714,0.0008046241,0.000021360946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022128336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015108449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008632793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018290214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017577936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04565513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101001634","doi":"10.1002/mcda.313","title":"A new rank correlation coefficient with application to the consensus ranking problem","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of National Defence","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Rank (graph theory); Metric (unit); Rank correlation; Mathematics; Correlation coefficient; Distance correlation; Statistics; Correlation; Measure (data warehouse); Combinatorics; Computer science; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Random variable","score_opus":0.0879760005428058,"score_gpt":0.3877226847301167,"score_spread":0.2997466841873109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101001634","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008796794,0.00079968525,0.98509717,0.0005507923,0.00012341989,0.00007958803,0.00008341901,0.00012296498,0.0043462133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38602015,0.0015821578,0.605919,0.0003050297,0.000525793,0.00047962333,0.00036104445,0.000236255,0.0045710253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9806363,0.010998756,0.00074790465,0.0014585519,0.0054599238,0.00069852395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9553467,0.030379856,0.0034521783,0.0016822712,0.008247184,0.00089175306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01732893,0.0014990446,0.002400687,0.0050968486,0.0013352036,0.0041487664,0.0020984185,0.0024351242,0.0029319588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06037899,0.0006569652,0.0011973623,0.0068139345,0.0029059527,0.0053861537,0.0031374893,0.0032822778,0.0007875106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016210036,0.00011220967,0.0034659065,0.00041657846,0.0002080722,0.00034756496,0.00035628854,0.38213357,0.0015895787,0.42195937,0.011046866,0.17820184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029972003,0.00010997693,0.0006576289,0.00006872789,0.00004446191,0.00017998095,0.00009102377,0.870308,0.0011586461,0.12122984,0.006052483,0.00006922928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034408446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002485359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01732893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030229248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034583271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09164524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105979176","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1475","title":"A New VNS Metaheuristic Using MADS as a Local Optimizer","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Risk and Portfolio Optimization","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada; Hydro-Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Metaheuristic; Mathematical optimization; Variable neighborhood search; Local optimum; Computer science; Local search (optimization); Variable (mathematics); Portfolio; Neighbourhood (mathematics); Mathematics; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.1453728942564561,"score_gpt":0.46303869649328305,"score_spread":0.31766580223682694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105979176","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038464658,0.0010033,0.9516042,0.00031102248,0.00020386191,0.000118876,0.00012966311,0.00041430292,0.007750162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45425016,0.00040746588,0.5364584,0.00033475383,0.000109320754,0.00047574527,0.0003841194,0.00012394316,0.007456187],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994825,0.00018266536,0.000026355548,0.00006634738,0.00019192338,0.000050142706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996407,0.00015548433,0.00004788517,0.000037736165,0.00008125958,0.00003690774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008191344,0.0006325826,0.0012254769,0.0012367459,0.00032608522,0.00079789694,0.0019482642,0.0012235198,0.0022618284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001238349,0.00042576995,0.0011149861,0.0010566551,0.00052084407,0.000538987,0.0010240995,0.0006745048,0.00031935272],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008411523,0.000056235825,0.00053613185,0.00007987388,0.00009169646,0.000058339872,0.000030992553,0.9276215,0.0028138272,0.008181988,0.0013797778,0.059065565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029065242,0.0000380965,0.00008006328,0.0000082288325,0.000009028274,0.000018008062,0.000004741075,0.99698454,0.00034803234,0.0012598804,0.0012155031,0.000004735341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037157054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003872079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037157054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009819171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008925892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0075665116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114035178","doi":"10.1002/mcda.463","title":"Multi‐Criteria Ratios: What is the Unit?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Unit (ring theory); Measure (data warehouse); Scale (ratio); Hierarchy; Level of measurement; Analytic hierarchy process; Mathematics; Statistics; Process (computing); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Data mining; Economics; Mathematics education; Physics","score_opus":0.3085612410334271,"score_gpt":0.467014015663691,"score_spread":0.15845277463026392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114035178","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08177929,0.012634648,0.79178774,0.011237501,0.0014770014,0.00035943455,0.00035040212,0.00040415666,0.099969774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82600284,0.0013331306,0.1696201,0.0005275325,0.0004735476,0.00033648673,0.00008913723,0.000098403,0.0015188487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9598188,0.02462591,0.0022434893,0.0022438422,0.01043721,0.00063072925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9354247,0.042685706,0.007120564,0.0046521067,0.008862303,0.0012546453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024415797,0.0010446511,0.0018082373,0.0048245536,0.0011504189,0.009222048,0.0027978548,0.0014561531,0.0065120235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12777749,0.0004326686,0.00097126607,0.0053127618,0.00723514,0.010791773,0.0033322165,0.0027977722,0.0009192707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010173127,0.00005021642,0.0016424388,0.00072255766,0.00015854045,0.000094869734,0.0012791766,0.0037685577,0.00067129644,0.87669337,0.0029055676,0.11191166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027441214,0.00017503044,0.0019705382,0.00077357114,0.00007857097,0.00013667012,0.0013615832,0.023146506,0.0013742116,0.9562083,0.014673671,0.00007376281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006721055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004202674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024415797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002921931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013628405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12912458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124637600","doi":"10.1002/mcda.352","title":"<i>e</i>‐democracy and participatory decision processes: lessons from <i>e</i>‐negotiation experiments","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Luonnontieteiden ja Tekniikan Tutkimuksen Toimikunta","keywords":"Negotiation; E-democracy; Democracy; Software deployment; Citizen journalism; e-participation; Participatory democracy; Participatory design; Public relations; Deliberative democracy; Voting; Knowledge management; E-Government; Sociology; State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Management science; Information and Communications Technology; Computer science; Engineering; Politics; Social science; Operations management; Law","score_opus":0.07943731263466125,"score_gpt":0.37625571297115334,"score_spread":0.2968184003364921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124637600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74200577,0.0012490324,0.049224265,0.0064540757,0.0002827903,0.0015617366,0.00020201587,0.00014672193,0.19887352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97591317,0.00075235317,0.015981726,0.00050028565,0.000041941083,0.0007583487,0.00009939214,0.000042326665,0.0059103635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879902,0.01041307,0.00022496103,0.00033554435,0.0007392858,0.0002969276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92252904,0.07184642,0.0010067286,0.002564947,0.0012441931,0.0008087186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01645228,0.0004259414,0.0007293549,0.00040247946,0.002224897,0.004003024,0.0016683112,0.0020781998,0.009741788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039854243,0.0003222002,0.0004185277,0.00084012654,0.0054879137,0.004442171,0.0030662694,0.0027923193,0.0007771971],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029405819,0.008625715,0.009018593,0.0019785776,0.00025829094,0.0011119485,0.0758208,0.054030407,0.008456754,0.6321555,0.018182598,0.18742023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033656806,0.008087327,0.0080486005,0.0014159074,0.00016566429,0.00052950263,0.032233577,0.13790135,0.019193394,0.663009,0.12570955,0.0003404316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022901872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015891909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01645228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015320195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012130158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08700901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125734567","doi":"10.1002/mcda.492","title":"Group Decision Makers' Preferences Modelling within the Goal Programming Model: An Overview and a Typology","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Optimization and Mathematical Programming","field":"Engineering","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Goal programming; Articulation (sociology); Group decision-making; Preference; Management science; Decision model; Computer science; Decision maker; Decision analysis; Process (computing); Group (periodic table); Decision process; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Machine learning; Sociology; Economics; Engineering; Social psychology; Political science; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.0828717758745934,"score_gpt":0.3479270677816569,"score_spread":0.26505529190706345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125734567","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028639782,0.0065217237,0.91844267,0.00345326,0.00021745244,0.00013845826,0.00014194204,0.0001621493,0.042282667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69172895,0.008898507,0.2928511,0.0005029347,0.0003419618,0.00060433685,0.0002382279,0.000114540664,0.0047194622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946904,0.0035499157,0.00026480888,0.000394141,0.00084074115,0.00026003798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972983,0.0017873956,0.00023881014,0.00022831102,0.0003099379,0.0001372198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052150646,0.0009394457,0.0008357335,0.0036724673,0.0009875096,0.006083744,0.001910136,0.0021925515,0.0021845035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004693333,0.0004390334,0.0014147924,0.0049890396,0.0035649135,0.005797099,0.0024397154,0.0027294245,0.00047421965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034731325,0.000054240583,0.0012015161,0.00024453012,0.000060948394,0.00030360892,0.0012402559,0.026343549,0.0003533185,0.9369951,0.0014647271,0.031703465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022756778,0.00006288876,0.0004919941,0.00033475924,0.000047535796,0.00038083366,0.0013535019,0.16378239,0.0005295269,0.805803,0.027129008,0.00006175783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001425731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006577151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006083744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017306941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011521346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027580202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127532696","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1494","title":"Mutual Funds Efficiency Measurement under Financial and Social Responsibility Criteria","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación","keywords":"Data envelopment analysis; Stochastic dominance; Social responsibility; Dominance (genetics); Order (exchange); Investment (military); Finance; Set (abstract data type); Socially responsible investing; Work (physics); Economics; Business; Actuarial science; Econometrics; Computer science; Political science; Public relations; Corporate governance; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05852120102707741,"score_gpt":0.2982685703016791,"score_spread":0.23974736927460166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127532696","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9859948,0.00013995125,0.011093418,0.00006723508,0.000003447329,0.000025426903,0.00009530249,0.000012454426,0.0025679981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99877805,0.000015878919,0.0010769168,0.0000025817903,0.0000029367611,0.00000700048,0.000053139167,0.0000011449929,0.00006236557],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98676515,0.0075927502,0.0009058899,0.0006409794,0.0034174647,0.0006777491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95306075,0.030199127,0.009424701,0.0029768748,0.0034858582,0.000852638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016537659,0.00048588956,0.00066772697,0.0034649344,0.00032618662,0.0019258335,0.00031307692,0.0005842538,0.00085718324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05633162,0.00008367929,0.0005026449,0.0024057787,0.0014483918,0.0018844446,0.0020734584,0.00034307392,0.00010498165],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013978808,0.00033107153,0.45334646,0.0002956985,0.00071786175,0.00027190536,0.0015733683,0.32263726,0.0039998977,0.09521918,0.001183761,0.11902568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011262756,0.0012015089,0.37069955,0.00017212659,0.00018422109,0.00041820318,0.0021612698,0.5090194,0.012519822,0.09950691,0.0038733839,0.00013102946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014115329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008516995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016537659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014945655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087216485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08746052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132765709","doi":"10.1002/mcda.431","title":"Correcting illegitimate rank reversals: proper adjustment of criteria weights prevent alleged AHP intransitivity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Multiplicative function; Normalization (sociology); Rank (graph theory); Mathematical economics; Axiom; Mathematics; Computer science; Econometrics; Combinatorics; Sociology","score_opus":0.1482708187361641,"score_gpt":0.4239214852747871,"score_spread":0.275650666538623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132765709","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05808642,0.00031488645,0.92251956,0.0042881994,0.00037393693,0.0002750176,0.000069549,0.0006054737,0.013466981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7014097,0.00012557203,0.29568774,0.00083185016,0.00011487127,0.00019425213,0.000038176022,0.00013346972,0.0014643489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9627181,0.02114704,0.0026877406,0.0025916519,0.009860464,0.0009948534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8556951,0.08754947,0.013982578,0.027451575,0.0142504815,0.0010707695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04085971,0.00072147755,0.0010323785,0.0012976101,0.0011091558,0.0029851173,0.0020850245,0.0014840312,0.002746633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22305742,0.00067498256,0.0007062989,0.0013192571,0.0046859127,0.0043913503,0.0032264735,0.0038787718,0.0007991715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008233694,0.0003673546,0.0061460505,0.00067044335,0.00027149307,0.0005589842,0.003105847,0.056498494,0.013329345,0.5008336,0.009471187,0.40792385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023611712,0.00040739917,0.0036099595,0.00031351816,0.00009048882,0.00031737325,0.00079858315,0.19347471,0.024020031,0.7583271,0.018246002,0.00015857386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00088849966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008680517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04085971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013310157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026993821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21608943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135604086","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1543","title":"Conceptualizing a Research Paradigm for Multi‐Objective Modelling in Supply Chain Management","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Sustainable Supply Chain Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Modellium (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Supply chain; Computer science; Supply chain management; Management science; Process (computing); Paradigm shift; Knowledge management; Process management; Sociology; Epistemology; Business; Engineering; Marketing; Philosophy","score_opus":0.18452823727655657,"score_gpt":0.40024891198970475,"score_spread":0.21572067471314818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135604086","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008120065,0.0010512394,0.9598424,0.0057858494,0.00015843876,0.00016243287,0.000055812186,0.00003626331,0.02478744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.385114,0.001959559,0.6075355,0.0008252829,0.00015362825,0.0010586762,0.000115991905,0.00004508443,0.0031922944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882074,0.008846467,0.0005159415,0.0005579041,0.001574245,0.0002980265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98803955,0.007790421,0.0011282671,0.0009367661,0.0015816818,0.00052334566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019486299,0.00093722495,0.00069718016,0.003822181,0.0017486522,0.008716479,0.0025648326,0.0027806908,0.003095247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010354741,0.0005523773,0.0014297107,0.00404318,0.009846676,0.011482542,0.0049746376,0.004020694,0.0004965776],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003676292,0.000016781934,0.00014665945,0.00008338763,0.00001077046,0.00002998178,0.00082830206,0.004047531,0.00015589889,0.98989594,0.0002212094,0.0045598825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009853111,0.000021305812,0.00010533245,0.00023411431,0.000011721745,0.000056830453,0.0013450857,0.029111534,0.00025586356,0.9541795,0.014651044,0.000017813423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012543794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014528795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019486299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003910993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043888204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10305458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144037545","doi":"10.1002/mcda.319","title":"Modelling risk and uncertainty with the analytic hierarchy process","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":145,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Outcome (game theory); Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Process (computing); Risk assessment; Hierarchy; Operations research; Management science; Engineering; Mathematics; Economics; Mathematical economics; Business","score_opus":0.14435394909451676,"score_gpt":0.40505969313201007,"score_spread":0.2607057440374933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144037545","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039460426,0.0005119509,0.99272305,0.00051454577,0.000028407125,0.00010103813,0.00003070942,0.00006055882,0.0020836971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25835055,0.0012480522,0.7387911,0.00013581397,0.0001238654,0.00038412042,0.000089680274,0.000027781176,0.00084902893],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.976185,0.015596376,0.0008360265,0.0006128593,0.0063702404,0.0003995241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980948,0.0153069105,0.0013215003,0.0006779354,0.00140525,0.0003404445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019392725,0.00122995,0.0015269258,0.0034259814,0.0013074391,0.0049518025,0.0021865426,0.0015973025,0.0017152041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02849346,0.00063895085,0.001561886,0.0033486406,0.0032611862,0.0037852023,0.0035876145,0.0026432439,0.00031309933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008334227,0.00009345614,0.0008689973,0.00052515615,0.0002770469,0.00028655602,0.0011957148,0.53461945,0.0010214113,0.3694647,0.0013609573,0.09020322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037693408,0.00006250326,0.00015842602,0.00013225632,0.000040394414,0.00004474146,0.00015332055,0.56622845,0.0004544688,0.42883164,0.0038180326,0.000038069335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040362985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027445992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019392725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002466815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037008354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.102559805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144464691","doi":"10.1002/mcda.430","title":"Non‐discriminating criteria in the AHP: removal and rank reversal","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Weighting; Analytic hierarchy process; Normalization (sociology); Rank (graph theory); Decision maker; Hierarchy; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics; Operations research; Combinatorics; Medicine; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.185032763567161,"score_gpt":0.45121314796121614,"score_spread":0.2661803843940551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144464691","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04466407,0.0004056002,0.94989216,0.00043209366,0.00007118475,0.00036589202,0.000032265536,0.00015118248,0.0039855735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44671407,0.00016252241,0.55105174,0.00013283947,0.000055035835,0.00028760996,0.00006844697,0.00006580667,0.001461985],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96795726,0.016693486,0.0015328105,0.00072305475,0.012455739,0.00063766626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9680038,0.022189131,0.0024652039,0.002760018,0.00414854,0.0004332164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024631558,0.0010515908,0.0020221919,0.0025625217,0.001242744,0.0028362991,0.0024871035,0.0012165966,0.0015703584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0508872,0.00068293425,0.0016561608,0.0029429456,0.002584684,0.002275313,0.0029171088,0.0037191564,0.00045882392],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062449387,0.00050537474,0.0024155627,0.0011928113,0.00034366938,0.0004444699,0.0012604919,0.34843114,0.017085703,0.17147775,0.0018086708,0.45440987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010243498,0.00022937312,0.00075827737,0.00011868169,0.000080337675,0.00012110063,0.00016117496,0.8861139,0.009858572,0.09888625,0.0034865923,0.00008330669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019265376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017661202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024631558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015424782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023304005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13026571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329341924","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1568","title":"Deflecting Arrow by Aggregating Rankings of Multiple Correlated Criteria According to Borda","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Humber Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Arrow; Arrow's impossibility theorem; Social choice theory; Voting; Impossibility; Outcome (game theory); Computer science; Rank (graph theory); Schedule; Variable (mathematics); Probabilistic logic; Selection (genetic algorithm); Aggregation problem; Mathematical economics; Random variable; Econometrics; Operations research; Mathematics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.1101495497017367,"score_gpt":0.4429899879139542,"score_spread":0.33284043821221754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329341924","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03899962,0.0015293036,0.9409062,0.0015522856,0.00021978059,0.000286349,0.00016908438,0.0002959192,0.016041437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7119045,0.0008410131,0.28316066,0.00035930224,0.00022981585,0.0004847045,0.00023641193,0.00008669508,0.0026968995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9425417,0.04253471,0.0020352947,0.003061774,0.0086042285,0.0012221932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9612297,0.026197117,0.0030456658,0.0053643966,0.0034208873,0.0007422598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04048054,0.001489555,0.0032337522,0.007008324,0.0019711338,0.008145142,0.0021531906,0.0018792724,0.0035011584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054414686,0.00088703126,0.0030463778,0.007434106,0.006050945,0.0071798516,0.004678133,0.0033957455,0.00046949025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027281366,0.00006379571,0.002562163,0.0005156376,0.0006680504,0.00010320697,0.0006497767,0.13204253,0.0006430389,0.7476322,0.0031218235,0.111725025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005132795,0.00020451368,0.0015381989,0.00016155222,0.00017645136,0.00006184793,0.0002383183,0.3127383,0.000784822,0.6780979,0.0058368333,0.00010997537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033801445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003098483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04048054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005155933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003217894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21408409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2506545887","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1561","title":"A Topsis‐Based Approach for Prioritized Aggregation in Multi‐Criteria Decision‐Making Problems","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Aggregation problem; TOPSIS; Ideal solution; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Similarity (geometry); Preference; Ideal (ethics); Process (computing); Data mining; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.1951479152644342,"score_gpt":0.4618738228182196,"score_spread":0.2667259075537854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2506545887","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041956226,0.0006778055,0.98823744,0.0003492463,0.00009436455,0.00032635863,0.000063584346,0.0001577436,0.005897884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16732623,0.0011249128,0.82861596,0.00013963551,0.00007410174,0.00060296565,0.0001444353,0.000039551054,0.0019322889],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902142,0.0050415355,0.00069217436,0.000464557,0.0033259494,0.00026147199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99718696,0.0014347812,0.00022082661,0.00010670334,0.00094754825,0.00010311668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007856748,0.0018132488,0.0020293002,0.004854256,0.0018245477,0.004470241,0.002169763,0.0013272245,0.004621389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067154025,0.00078854425,0.0027321035,0.005915475,0.001323032,0.0016935242,0.0021888607,0.002296372,0.00063419796],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000169403,0.00027381475,0.0012167798,0.0022203005,0.00097537803,0.0010813576,0.0016992872,0.5482943,0.0085902875,0.1382295,0.0058813817,0.29136822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000534677,0.00018924533,0.0005958184,0.00028275186,0.00023063827,0.00023109645,0.000446232,0.8972466,0.0018530822,0.08789743,0.010888292,0.00008541067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006257618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007518337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007856748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027795369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039422917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041550934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523549523","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1573","title":"A Fuzzy Topsis Method for Prioritized Aggregation in Multi‐Criteria Decision Making Problems","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Computer science; Fuzzy logic; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Operations research; Decision-making models; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.17861781636905597,"score_gpt":0.4952328943117909,"score_spread":0.3166150779427349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523549523","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044703046,0.00045809825,0.99003893,0.00018156605,0.00009835153,0.0003981731,0.000065456414,0.00014968925,0.0041393507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12604131,0.00064068503,0.8704709,0.00005667238,0.00006172079,0.00085463986,0.0001269415,0.000035954345,0.001711223],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98778397,0.007121844,0.0007768958,0.000552016,0.0034969565,0.0002683449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961217,0.0020297451,0.00029499977,0.00014019941,0.0013159774,0.000097383636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00848179,0.0019246596,0.0016995498,0.005720838,0.0017150849,0.0036834702,0.0018674539,0.0012153867,0.005481234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009749731,0.00064034626,0.0024561628,0.0061577787,0.0010872771,0.001768372,0.0016997554,0.00192937,0.0007177602],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027971127,0.00029051813,0.0016180491,0.0025287576,0.0010770536,0.0010649575,0.003011176,0.37124845,0.012068098,0.15832403,0.0072168563,0.4412723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007340881,0.0002452193,0.0008437896,0.00032342447,0.00021059524,0.00022469116,0.0006453294,0.9182941,0.0026007758,0.06511496,0.011319288,0.000104459905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006369395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061386507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00848179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024865593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004339997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04485649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907009959","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1658","title":"Investigating trade‐offs between optimal mobile photo enforcement programme plans","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Silhouette; Computer science; Medoid; Set (abstract data type); Partition (number theory); Cluster analysis; Metric (unit); Jaccard index; Multi-objective optimization; Data mining; Index (typography); Operations research; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Operations management; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Machine learning","score_opus":0.03445674400745234,"score_gpt":0.3314569130756071,"score_spread":0.29700016906815474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907009959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8797916,0.00035062447,0.10626723,0.00033115764,0.000026225058,0.00040808108,0.00019947712,0.00016194486,0.012463665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96989036,0.000076697776,0.028717164,0.000026775833,0.0000037312138,0.0001676907,0.00008687525,0.000021081292,0.001009576],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922025,0.00037483263,0.000035285782,0.00008282435,0.00012701302,0.00015988901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99559826,0.0035079746,0.00030239776,0.000100515164,0.00033392038,0.00015692275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034855732,0.0007336326,0.00068235985,0.0024086002,0.0004448417,0.0017041236,0.00061615446,0.0013147766,0.0032223235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010504951,0.00060410105,0.000770127,0.00070511154,0.0005323835,0.0010636628,0.0007543995,0.00068253314,0.00017666022],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019156148,0.00019698426,0.0022340408,0.00008556291,0.000043624812,0.00006179739,0.00006470218,0.9783977,0.0015022826,0.0025658244,0.00028022405,0.014375713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021440992,0.00026144023,0.0019815157,0.000025507377,0.000026646363,0.000011065954,0.00020619098,0.99458647,0.0010435971,0.0016028298,0.0002221404,0.000011077834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003919795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033286647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003919795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017539907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011430825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01843369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946553766","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1666","title":"Social enterprises and the performance measurement challenge: Could the data envelopment analysis be the solution?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Efficiency Analysis Using DEA","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Data envelopment analysis; Popularity; Adaptability; Function (biology); Computer science; Dual (grammatical number); Envelopment; Business; Operations research; Knowledge management; Economics; Mathematics; Management; Statistics; Psychology","score_opus":0.21207304019079012,"score_gpt":0.42741617851953634,"score_spread":0.21534313832874621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946553766","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.068979,0.056652013,0.7250087,0.12003909,0.0011550043,0.00016907525,0.00036751863,0.00011411252,0.027515568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8616308,0.020610211,0.11253864,0.002173109,0.000958928,0.00033223684,0.00011776713,0.000050306422,0.0015879924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9730391,0.020546928,0.0010097043,0.0010246945,0.0037227701,0.0006568053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93181896,0.055997122,0.0033704883,0.0021678095,0.006037029,0.00060856977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039692424,0.0010787509,0.0021061671,0.0037530418,0.0009910449,0.0070811645,0.0014698711,0.0033084126,0.0015382217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058905654,0.0004879715,0.001279687,0.006804186,0.0061729606,0.0080001475,0.0036193202,0.004526152,0.00030408578],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049832346,0.000084774954,0.002598708,0.0007536565,0.00018119211,0.00012415904,0.00065994443,0.04388889,0.00027090547,0.8725124,0.0026912845,0.07618424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012132981,0.00006712791,0.0016779754,0.0008244407,0.00002337262,0.000059732138,0.0024398281,0.058824353,0.00052813935,0.9209735,0.01449457,0.00007485918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046841605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023643293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039692424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054445737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055311844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20991606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980440490","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1695","title":"Efficiency measurement of Ontario's sawmills using bootstrap data envelopment analysis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Efficiency Analysis Using DEA","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Data envelopment analysis; Inefficiency; Efficiency; Environmental economics; Operations management; Operations research; Business; Economics; Statistics; Engineering; Microeconomics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2894945717496503,"score_gpt":0.44450257759075196,"score_spread":0.15500800584110164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980440490","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9809778,0.00016282119,0.011955353,0.000069006965,0.000004256173,0.00006751728,0.0015072738,0.000020513873,0.005235499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99491405,0.00006984802,0.003498208,0.0000033328156,8.707628e-7,0.00002659359,0.00065111474,0.0000040223977,0.00083200535],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987317,0.00016140712,0.000066133354,0.000112220056,0.0007996312,0.00012905085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99629897,0.0011380314,0.000626628,0.00023830685,0.0016090584,0.000089075686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019398725,0.00019782927,0.0003201093,0.0012112926,0.0006080125,0.00095045374,0.00037131997,0.00017869081,0.0012566408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064014127,0.00013326743,0.0004940712,0.002660561,0.0005767291,0.00047133205,0.000402031,0.00020794832,0.0001281864],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058280776,0.00013502009,0.60259783,0.00037316812,0.00022791978,0.0003567496,0.0021601669,0.26021042,0.007852752,0.008192477,0.0032902635,0.1140204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018204657,0.00017426183,0.8258219,0.00006113509,0.000048331174,0.0000627652,0.0026996443,0.15802583,0.003836802,0.0022267555,0.0069764317,0.000047837028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.534675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68508434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.465325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008850207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006677953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93613076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990534220","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1682","title":"Multicriteria decision making for sustainable development: A systematic review","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Sustainable Building Design and Assessment","field":"Engineering","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Sustainability; Management science; Sustainable development; Dimension (graph theory); Context (archaeology); Process management; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Operations research; Engineering; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.053191230179372995,"score_gpt":0.38913946032045016,"score_spread":0.33594823014107716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990534220","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00066376274,0.99586844,0.0010743659,0.0006847084,0.00017941039,0.00081015076,0.00018980405,0.000013415967,0.0005159561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027186634,0.9615582,0.0073298896,0.0008775407,0.00019678158,0.002426053,0.00025901032,0.000014302838,0.0001515751],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.95353544,0.027988333,0.00927584,0.0019201518,0.0066767163,0.0006034989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8543293,0.12121559,0.012340906,0.0022912656,0.0089325765,0.0008903816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034174412,0.0021485526,0.007393958,0.014388941,0.0013943625,0.005485155,0.0030258636,0.0028174717,0.0065717194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1228154,0.0012949526,0.011107327,0.012297536,0.0017557356,0.004646852,0.0032453171,0.002827911,0.00044836345],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013239474,0.000085317915,0.00073308375,0.8526213,0.0063877925,0.000103442915,0.00047702645,0.00065417454,0.00011024439,0.0021634295,0.0027007177,0.13383105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012983572,0.0001892599,0.0012972998,0.9562484,0.011891308,0.00021231263,0.0004643127,0.00046194883,0.00015476579,0.0020626835,0.026826998,0.00006101817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058220453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015350321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034174412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008931419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03048661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18073374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092736721","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1722","title":"Using <scp>MACBETH</scp> for the performance expression of a <scp>mixed‐use</scp> ecopark","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Sustainable Industrial Ecology","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Industrial park; Sustainability; Plan (archaeology); Software deployment; Control (management); Action plan; Action (physics); Industrial symbiosis; Computer science; Process management; Operations research; Expression (computer science); Business; Engineering; Economics; Management; Software engineering; Ecology; Artificial intelligence; Geography","score_opus":0.08533012693633453,"score_gpt":0.3199468089338406,"score_spread":0.23461668199750607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092736721","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033659074,0.00019847987,0.86758006,0.0015575202,0.0003268615,0.00039313672,0.000646976,0.0012326164,0.09440529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7195703,0.00017449947,0.24966112,0.00037824077,0.00009727078,0.00048552948,0.00035265108,0.00040798626,0.028872417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99738044,0.0009115924,0.00017807612,0.00025997197,0.0010316921,0.0002381443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964031,0.001756296,0.0004475365,0.00029984806,0.0009802588,0.00011293394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035449886,0.0009599238,0.00034494838,0.0017270287,0.0008778446,0.0037029458,0.00072536204,0.0008861219,0.010674182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007602807,0.00023540658,0.00077252346,0.0011956738,0.0020119317,0.0019118821,0.0013605335,0.0012347478,0.0013426514],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016489718,0.00011372606,0.00208995,0.00027059982,0.000052472107,0.0012719419,0.0009514352,0.22802493,0.012683314,0.66340715,0.014707637,0.076262064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016047861,0.000146729,0.0014240686,0.00014947806,0.000023110066,0.00026279312,0.0003338175,0.81841725,0.013727694,0.11512151,0.050301906,0.00007560168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014988621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012756028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014988621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002884502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001636973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035708666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120785167","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1730","title":"A disaggregation approach for indirect preference elicitation in Electre <scp>TRI‐nC</scp>: Application and validation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"ELECTRE; Sorting; Pairwise comparison; Robustness (evolution); Preference; Preference elicitation; Computer science; Decision maker; Credibility; Operations research; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics; Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Algorithm","score_opus":0.16882289800080064,"score_gpt":0.4272772082113002,"score_spread":0.2584543102104996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120785167","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1164747,0.00009626196,0.87930846,0.00014844422,0.000021165335,0.0004973304,0.00028992706,0.0004762889,0.0026873702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53334326,0.00005805219,0.4650534,0.000060901566,0.00000618878,0.000631006,0.00026441156,0.00003155033,0.00055132597],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895159,0.0075529967,0.00046028406,0.00056933734,0.0017109287,0.00019061522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9613395,0.028483842,0.001524471,0.0028335059,0.0054794424,0.0003393454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013947006,0.0008262919,0.00092310936,0.0020559966,0.0006991422,0.0012248683,0.00082509906,0.000833299,0.0032652977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03384045,0.0003837693,0.0007506862,0.0025311077,0.0007971408,0.0009789924,0.0020923116,0.0015818035,0.00035567387],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009391184,0.00060112943,0.007085985,0.0007065704,0.00033807455,0.00014028994,0.0011212598,0.6474973,0.01048961,0.0127487695,0.0014662513,0.31686562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028480981,0.000103494036,0.0013739797,0.000022485832,0.000010220848,0.00002072063,0.000077561075,0.9936879,0.002331367,0.0018260417,0.00050161034,0.000016136428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008445336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047517144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013947006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015243008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016403955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073759735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121063510","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1732","title":"Application of spatial multicriteria decision analysis in healthcare: Identifying drivers and triggers of infectious disease outbreaks using ensemble learning","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"COVID-19 epidemiological studies","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Illinois Department of Transportation; Mississippi State University; U.S. Department of Transportation","keywords":"Multiple-criteria decision analysis; Geospatial analysis; Decision tree; Computer science; Ensemble learning; Weighting; Machine learning; Learning vector quantization; Artificial intelligence; Geographic information system; Support vector machine; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Artificial neural network; Geography; Disease; Cartography; Operations research; Mathematics; Medicine","score_opus":0.14205497378415624,"score_gpt":0.4577482133799339,"score_spread":0.31569323959577766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121063510","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50319993,0.00071169704,0.49142444,0.0015447628,0.00012891192,0.00011098234,0.00032703657,0.00028388767,0.002268281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97104037,0.00013783165,0.028329646,0.000051143288,0.000037175967,0.000025698957,0.0001331837,0.0000073997885,0.00023766707],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863726,0.00081655337,0.00008130406,0.00022498237,0.0001480309,0.000091894486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952734,0.0035506468,0.00032811754,0.00022273479,0.0004874742,0.00013752504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041517997,0.0007477404,0.0010876438,0.0019454854,0.00046575104,0.0013462533,0.00075304165,0.0008198297,0.0007825128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070676086,0.000296336,0.0011744037,0.0012706321,0.00029926436,0.0009377228,0.0010222533,0.0008361301,0.00010858822],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013249586,0.00015066258,0.04134192,0.000052948304,0.00038846518,0.000098948,0.00011099833,0.894895,0.00053237495,0.0015728519,0.00056048884,0.060162894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020941786,0.000020823956,0.0012518766,0.000005755859,0.000017557182,0.000008311899,0.00002852542,0.9973677,0.00011377179,0.0011127245,0.00006640365,0.000004500624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009364295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005602213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009364295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008622117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007111934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0219571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126701592","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1736","title":"Analysis of some incentives on two‐echelon reverse supply chain with a strategic consumer: The case of unwanted medications in households","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Sustainable Supply Chain Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Stackelberg competition; Supply chain; Novelty; Incentive; Business; Marketing; Game theory; Perspective (graphical); Reverse logistics; Industrial organization; Microeconomics; Advertising; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.030134191482655837,"score_gpt":0.3063452142952283,"score_spread":0.2762110228125725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126701592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7983998,0.00055344973,0.16793709,0.002340463,0.00007845725,0.00034576937,0.00020384292,0.00009821608,0.030042892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98855877,0.0001276571,0.005219079,0.000043330783,0.000014449372,0.00004466342,0.000023441706,0.0000070367046,0.0059615974],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825126,0.00078392826,0.00005321883,0.00022741192,0.00018946042,0.00049476174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948419,0.003215027,0.00063077844,0.0001931448,0.0005364796,0.00058261305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025175116,0.00054960145,0.0009662468,0.0010209973,0.001738755,0.0022410164,0.0014021085,0.0031025875,0.010484331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005631205,0.0005678826,0.0012007265,0.0007745945,0.001538681,0.0024093632,0.0017505542,0.0012573285,0.000295464],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006345091,0.00066411844,0.012838713,0.0002690892,0.000116568866,0.0039489274,0.0007327719,0.6806293,0.0033030144,0.27858225,0.002406893,0.015873848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007259214,0.00021439756,0.0016814856,0.000024980362,0.00005607496,0.0002246983,0.0007781171,0.962088,0.0005636701,0.032474067,0.0017798457,0.00004207494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012439749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074982294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012439749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028901568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002170907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03507358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134190073","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1742","title":"<scp>TSMAA‐TRI</scp>: A temporal multi‐criteria sorting approach under uncertainty","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"","keywords":"Sorting; Context (archaeology); Computer science; sort; Generalization; Index (typography); Mathematical optimization; Monte Carlo method; Operations research; Mathematics; Statistics; Algorithm; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.20082180735145602,"score_gpt":0.45017587130958786,"score_spread":0.24935406395813184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134190073","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009757066,0.00020890383,0.98301893,0.00046264363,0.00005673184,0.00029331262,0.0002425234,0.00026510895,0.00569465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24484229,0.0002568586,0.7491848,0.0002206965,0.000092406575,0.00071330625,0.00046771514,0.0001103222,0.0041115936],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938008,0.0032625783,0.00042963252,0.0004991623,0.0016958574,0.0003118652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909496,0.0046207486,0.0006748842,0.00040625548,0.0029957746,0.00035277545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008623391,0.001060793,0.0014692505,0.0046964036,0.0015718275,0.0030170884,0.001350722,0.00127283,0.0070305453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013251386,0.00049820455,0.0021900588,0.0047144946,0.0013693254,0.002383644,0.0017145077,0.0019446568,0.0007725474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020364374,0.0002992307,0.0029094173,0.0006305244,0.00032914028,0.00030543676,0.0005555994,0.56371176,0.0031531425,0.108653314,0.0068482873,0.31240052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014983314,0.00009980588,0.0007182125,0.00007980024,0.000027322567,0.00005848185,0.0001913361,0.94430727,0.0011598483,0.049025588,0.0042828084,0.000034519995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018528836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0211577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018528836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039028174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005640948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04560542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313256956","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1800","title":"A hybrid multi‐criteria decision‐making approach to evaluate interrelationships and impacts of supply chain performance factors on pharmaceutical industry","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Sustainable Supply Chain Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Interdependence; Supply chain; Business; Process (computing); Process management; Expert opinion; Supply chain management; Health care; Analytic network process; Resource (disambiguation); Pharmaceutical industry; Knowledge management; Operations management; Computer science; Marketing; Operations research; Engineering; Analytic hierarchy process; Medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.07031537874710428,"score_gpt":0.35981079818459755,"score_spread":0.28949541943749324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313256956","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27452767,0.00072719087,0.7132854,0.0006145348,0.00008853407,0.002766359,0.0004681454,0.00018741752,0.007334726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7659727,0.00023664937,0.231368,0.000088057524,0.000025333009,0.0014280298,0.00022502085,0.000016299711,0.0006399571],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870522,0.009578887,0.00068553415,0.0006245119,0.0015632206,0.00049572653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813399,0.014932482,0.0010424978,0.00026123773,0.0019176756,0.0005061952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017570956,0.0019311614,0.0022154367,0.00921427,0.0018041778,0.004963726,0.001820736,0.0019868324,0.004276781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02243093,0.00092838355,0.003291698,0.0050353846,0.001326374,0.0019952422,0.002417588,0.0015492109,0.00019213863],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010448365,0.0012148878,0.023455847,0.0013734432,0.0014548431,0.00049352937,0.0012877486,0.854397,0.0033764024,0.017243033,0.00084805954,0.09381048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000835401,0.00069881463,0.0021167214,0.00012497265,0.00016944877,0.000035664616,0.00069879566,0.9854703,0.00087220926,0.009215187,0.0004572286,0.00005716636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006572237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070271906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017570956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046889363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005366296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09292519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382004992","doi":"10.1002/mcda.1807","title":"Supply chain mapping for improving “visilience”: A hybrid multi‐criteria decision making based methodology","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis","topic":"Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Supply chain; Midstream; Upstream (networking); Process management; Computer science; Value stream mapping; Resilience (materials science); Process (computing); Business; Operations management; Petroleum industry; Engineering; Lean manufacturing; Marketing","score_opus":0.08479310239829353,"score_gpt":0.3718829818181159,"score_spread":0.2870898794198224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382004992","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03406131,0.00017385857,0.96021354,0.00034545336,0.00002225188,0.00063972047,0.0001155521,0.0001315294,0.004296755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3375292,0.00012377054,0.6603641,0.00008447207,0.000014907092,0.0009286524,0.00014238554,0.00003039446,0.0007820477],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933929,0.004629591,0.00030239363,0.0004901367,0.0008719238,0.00031298236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990351,0.007536959,0.00053019903,0.00023558893,0.0010623045,0.00028392367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010974405,0.0015541859,0.0013240252,0.0074430546,0.001556871,0.0036526863,0.0018038008,0.0015878932,0.0053308574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013078833,0.00078577676,0.0020597843,0.004225841,0.0013998016,0.0019768781,0.003198096,0.0015497671,0.00028220407],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020386884,0.0005377276,0.007965233,0.0010328486,0.0005236337,0.00039643422,0.0019754672,0.7534953,0.0030086176,0.059067395,0.0012481611,0.17054528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029330975,0.00013987969,0.00066752825,0.000127312,0.00006172579,0.00003454735,0.000562083,0.9652865,0.0007184479,0.031232854,0.0011119107,0.000027935175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042968984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043366933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010974405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029934933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047237175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05803889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}