{"meta":{"query_hash":"e391bc5a6e02","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Politeness Research"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e391bc5a6e02","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Politeness+Research"},"results":[{"id":"W2605678393","doi":"10.1515/pr-2015-0029","title":"Analyzing online postings as social behavior for L2 instruction of (im)politeness: Sensitizing advanced learners of German or English","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politeness Research","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politeness; German; Psychology; Negotiation; Inclusion (mineral); Variety (cybernetics); Citizen journalism; Diversity (politics); Linguistics; Sociology; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Social psychology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1400667058755662,"score_gpt":0.47070677647331155,"score_spread":0.33064007059774536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605678393","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897077,0.00005360111,0.002677321,0.00013406869,0.00001929316,0.00010573167,0.000091814494,0.00004478489,0.0071656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99549425,0.00006834619,0.0027190803,0.00004227034,0.000020006628,0.0001162353,0.00006377642,0.000030366007,0.0014456456],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977986,0.0015011411,0.00009708827,0.00013310596,0.00034184457,0.00012820322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9689062,0.02406676,0.003153787,0.001266896,0.002091553,0.00051479024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032041338,0.00033321875,0.00022852955,0.0017190891,0.0009339329,0.0029539876,0.00038042088,0.00063060306,0.004144419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019873992,0.00014228525,0.00018717744,0.0011435541,0.0013944727,0.0023260457,0.0018154926,0.00072430377,0.00074452686],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007829867,0.0008689782,0.11663947,0.0013778287,0.000051288614,0.001007082,0.57654905,0.00067905954,0.05380938,0.00555939,0.0025138557,0.24016163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003908968,0.0013684295,0.39632857,0.00074220716,0.00008190653,0.00069897476,0.5311854,0.0043478375,0.023588292,0.005265336,0.036226567,0.00012743457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049219595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011344553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004144419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008436538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016945302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992839570","doi":"10.1515/pr-2017-0008","title":"Factors in the perception of speaker politeness<b>: the effect of linguistic structure, imposition and prosody</b>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politeness Research","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politeness; Prosody; Linguistics; Perception; Psychology","score_opus":0.07303777544422126,"score_gpt":0.3938417560531113,"score_spread":0.32080398060889004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992839570","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977406,0.000041762043,0.0005793269,0.0000193769,0.000003885772,0.000011825234,0.0000115967005,0.0000064049364,0.001585286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994123,0.000021667212,0.0003756025,0.000011703598,0.000003548299,0.000011302676,0.000014747107,0.0000063932152,0.00014269885],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999062,0.0005456157,0.00006684956,0.00012540654,0.00014905893,0.000051068655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98972684,0.007816517,0.0013625124,0.00031536707,0.00043318523,0.0003455734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015173625,0.00020520599,0.00020617207,0.0002571454,0.0002746463,0.0017001939,0.00015414173,0.00038060063,0.0026242214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009670138,0.0002533273,0.0001545522,0.0001350909,0.0007901619,0.00047935615,0.00067002606,0.00067221344,0.00020701793],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005113487,0.00058719976,0.121338435,0.00051913835,0.00016518986,0.00042417774,0.011931018,0.0005341064,0.8272009,0.0014113399,0.00017759168,0.030597327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006313545,0.001138963,0.966679,0.000050121373,0.00007349897,0.00034628928,0.003457458,0.0022302524,0.024556512,0.00083623343,0.0005251971,0.00004337486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003452453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025299858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0026242214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001427526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013479043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00877887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134301815","doi":"10.1515/pr-2020-0031","title":"Sacred civility? An alternative conceptual architecture informed by cultural sociology","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politeness Research","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Politeness; Civility; Sociology; Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Face (sociological concept); Everyday life; Sociology of culture; Aesthetics; Social science; Politics; Linguistics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.26644483234317673,"score_gpt":0.4463384880497253,"score_spread":0.17989365570654858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134301815","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16298732,0.011760162,0.19071409,0.08337137,0.0016010215,0.0002807895,0.00010429716,0.00017479502,0.54900616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98527783,0.0009184459,0.009591788,0.00095891906,0.00020660648,0.00015071103,0.0000282402,0.000041531115,0.0028259924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862365,0.011424275,0.0002496626,0.0006833479,0.00084364304,0.0005625418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905042,0.005906022,0.000689858,0.0011571108,0.00089927256,0.00084353174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011909695,0.00088053243,0.00090483506,0.0067566857,0.0068258937,0.017793352,0.00284893,0.0043607857,0.004090713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009339875,0.00046088456,0.0006999673,0.0032895473,0.09506907,0.017942332,0.00891496,0.0064171785,0.00045652976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005173374,0.000007865002,0.00014242256,0.000021655309,0.000001998001,0.000034003115,0.016244443,0.000095064344,0.00004252149,0.98178333,0.00017484558,0.001446616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013602261,0.000029393297,0.00034816458,0.0002240636,0.000009324869,0.00014774897,0.031875394,0.0019899982,0.00011209822,0.9314433,0.033789102,0.000017754912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045885616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029655753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017793352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009973578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045640897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072363675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}