{"meta":{"query_hash":"e391bc5a6e02","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Politeness Research"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e391bc5a6e02","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Politeness+Research"},"results":[{"id":"W2605678393","doi":"10.1515/pr-2015-0029","title":"Analyzing online postings as social behavior for L2 instruction of (im)politeness: Sensitizing advanced learners of German or English","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politeness Research","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politeness; German; Psychology; Negotiation; Inclusion (mineral); Variety (cybernetics); Citizen journalism; Diversity (politics); Linguistics; Sociology; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Social psychology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1400667058755662,"score_gpt":0.47070677647331155,"score_spread":0.33064007059774536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605678393","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99583876,0.00027723634,0.000009466341,0.00039507903,0.00042209847,0.00018345744,0.000121584766,0.000008278884,0.002744012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99559104,0.00013869251,0.0003370132,0.000013248923,0.0024719005,0.0000080508,0.000011620744,0.00003320306,0.0013952152],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973971,0.00017635795,0.00089410105,0.0001939045,0.00085117517,0.00048731922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99333805,0.00027699707,0.0013636127,0.00031728283,0.0046072877,0.00009680099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016309593,0.00017257863,0.00073679036,0.0008060416,0.0012407618,0.00025142057,0.00055804255,0.00007632097,0.00012186428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024037554,0.00013184518,0.00039024223,0.00011760476,0.0013372259,0.00079724373,0.00020971797,0.0004132986,8.4055284e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005325264,0.0022592184,0.021615477,0.0028464443,0.0038633402,0.00051203906,0.45859113,0.00015960362,0.041730832,0.15796314,0.0010734301,0.30406007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007865666,0.0031288771,0.044124663,0.0022180574,0.001574237,0.00013827086,0.8960003,0.00022017617,0.023527415,0.005607572,0.01459281,0.0010019442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015383991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000872093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4374092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011904435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028962182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9543062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992839570","doi":"10.1515/pr-2017-0008","title":"Factors in the perception of speaker politeness<b>: the effect of linguistic structure, imposition and prosody</b>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politeness Research","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Politeness; Prosody; Linguistics; Perception; Psychology","score_opus":0.07303777544422126,"score_gpt":0.3938417560531113,"score_spread":0.32080398060889004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992839570","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948006,0.00060075964,0.0000011387145,0.00042628884,0.00011175117,0.00031945124,0.000029156605,0.0000021575765,0.0037086504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99948543,0.00007447396,0.0000050109634,0.000013788924,0.00026664857,0.0000034552409,0.000006616026,0.000010681674,0.00013387697],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975081,0.0010858224,0.0004361946,0.00008343338,0.00067348534,0.00021292621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977154,0.0010388802,0.00028881256,0.0003517067,0.0005726006,0.0000325918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020616103,0.00010596138,0.0002733865,0.00031296365,0.00013877492,0.00015597872,0.0005073756,0.000045730325,0.00018123385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024477651,0.00004635376,0.000085993684,0.00013274817,0.0005637623,0.00020710613,0.00007568152,0.0004677186,0.0000015435975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007112911,0.00022725541,0.19165096,0.0012498767,0.00018096744,0.000011544246,0.45891118,0.00008169047,0.033111688,0.31119615,0.00021416934,0.0024532343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018432447,0.002247428,0.7199789,0.0006783813,0.000102586775,0.000060299517,0.24227287,0.00011500202,0.007981732,0.022115242,0.002367715,0.00023654013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012124053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021567734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.528328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046761612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009660667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20772058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134301815","doi":"10.1515/pr-2020-0031","title":"Sacred civility? An alternative conceptual architecture informed by cultural sociology","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politeness Research","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Politeness; Civility; Sociology; Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Face (sociological concept); Everyday life; Sociology of culture; Aesthetics; Social science; Politics; Linguistics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.26644483234317673,"score_gpt":0.4463384880497253,"score_spread":0.17989365570654858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134301815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95642394,0.0022087693,0.0000736108,0.013265305,0.00018599811,0.0001953199,0.00016803574,0.000029744655,0.02744928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99674934,0.00023572895,0.000087730696,0.00072515936,0.0014490783,0.0000076224533,0.000044319586,0.00001645384,0.00068454194],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972467,0.00092153344,0.00050181686,0.00014978622,0.0007287541,0.0004514103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973352,0.0004905882,0.00026852076,0.00025180526,0.0013433894,0.0003105189],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007228412,0.00014965977,0.0003384583,0.0001541382,0.00038205538,0.0003360267,0.0010430889,0.00007625322,0.0010942932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005340289,0.000100327015,0.00012586352,0.00008241741,0.0026889301,0.00083368097,0.00017418948,0.0011028543,0.000034745237],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034443906,0.00013816547,0.00020313288,0.000044135602,0.00018547813,0.000031527983,0.6768933,0.000049357954,0.0021360877,0.29296145,0.024660725,0.0023522126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013448864,0.0011687495,0.00032467637,0.000048479425,0.000020156516,0.000033517583,0.56579876,0.000086599845,0.0011139683,0.01816277,0.41165292,0.0002445378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046625914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002937306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3869922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108135566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004639519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}