{"meta":{"query_hash":"bc86af3cb016","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Political Ideologies"},"cohort_total":6,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":6,"exported":6,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/bc86af3cb016","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Political+Ideologies"},"results":[{"id":"W2008271487","doi":"10.1080/13569317.2012.716612","title":"Georges Bataille's post-anarchism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Ideologies","topic":"Anarchism and Radical Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Universalism; Essentialism; Epistemology; Relativism; Ideology; Philosophy; Subject (documents); Sociology; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.03316771751412277,"score_gpt":0.3570016704859603,"score_spread":0.32383395297183754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008271487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75070566,0.0024529675,0.00077850785,0.1423323,0.0023111994,0.00011825684,0.000021721578,0.00009193738,0.10118746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930756,0.00013883463,0.0015596824,0.0018162094,0.0024609785,6.895696e-7,8.152876e-7,0.000009407068,0.0009377687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740165,0.00035471222,0.00044397314,0.00007598434,0.00054141396,0.0011822484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99748373,0.0010765201,0.00015347164,0.00012745187,0.00022913318,0.00092971744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012068364,0.00011384452,0.0002930342,0.00014814857,0.00030078413,0.000035294583,0.0004295911,0.00014565642,0.0003360756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005233983,0.00008133128,0.0002099646,0.00010676648,0.00253732,0.00046278624,0.00009393031,0.000391154,0.000081981154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012370417,0.000088256274,0.011263087,0.000007996038,0.000027366192,0.000022994514,0.0016090858,5.0261855e-7,0.000043131648,0.9806044,0.005477237,0.0008435911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005074037,0.00036375417,0.21175842,0.00005712737,0.00014794325,0.0001887681,0.032714706,0.000003994768,0.000341198,0.4364139,0.31708357,0.00041920622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012748003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000057580255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54419047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013375384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030445686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9348861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055320780","doi":"10.1080/13569310410001691187","title":"Hegemony after deconstruction: the consequences of undecidability","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Ideologies","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hegemony; Ideology; Democracy; Epistemology; Sociology; Politics; Institution; Undecidable problem; Context (archaeology); Deconstruction (building); Subject (documents); Political science; Social science; Law; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.03164311460427639,"score_gpt":0.3427495741598436,"score_spread":0.3111064595555672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055320780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9707314,0.00020850143,0.0003063091,0.023979502,0.00069155055,0.00008688402,0.0000046895666,0.000015880538,0.003975279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99744,0.000029139384,0.0016436875,0.0005592407,0.00026659007,0.0000023177772,7.0501514e-8,0.0000031903412,0.000055775934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819916,0.00027660828,0.0005485069,0.00009524961,0.0005019764,0.0003785046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985417,0.0005999892,0.0002701323,0.00015370392,0.00029146898,0.0001429977],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011528688,0.000086030894,0.00024538685,0.00006493978,0.00018854835,0.00004414814,0.00041789148,0.00009787761,0.00016685096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025269818,0.000050192597,0.00016205148,0.00014762681,0.004659072,0.00027979404,0.000058909132,0.00022182963,0.000007521996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044467783,0.00006397822,0.07617835,0.000009134474,0.000046292145,0.000031034106,0.0013965329,0.000017459248,0.00015440745,0.92148936,0.00009533795,0.0004736209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002539586,0.00010801669,0.14804524,0.000040597908,0.000032640644,0.000038849063,0.0071429773,2.1483683e-7,0.0036051495,0.8397389,0.00092623,0.00006721902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001943175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000890696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.081750475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002772231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006264953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057314020","doi":"10.1080/13569317.2012.676863","title":"‘The new Messiah of my life’: Anthony Crosland's reading of Lucien Laurat's<i>Marxism and Democracy</i>(1940)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Ideologies","topic":"French Historical and Cultural Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Messiah; Ideology; Democracy; Reading (process); Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Politics; Theology","score_opus":0.03886079535026928,"score_gpt":0.2566450601085081,"score_spread":0.21778426475823884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057314020","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7934966,0.10687588,0.00011676209,0.03949717,0.0036277696,0.00019658096,0.0000345656,0.000047796653,0.05610685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993496,0.00060605526,0.00021630041,0.00015653098,0.001044968,7.331388e-7,3.1354747e-7,0.0000056911044,0.0044734064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858487,0.00006568361,0.0006168608,0.000071775576,0.00024938196,0.0004114071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983971,0.00066003704,0.00036848526,0.00009257455,0.00024786356,0.00023394244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003288032,0.00013134954,0.00043566574,0.000045189267,0.00034430332,0.00005182097,0.00019756635,0.000051441224,0.00013176896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011200369,0.000065073706,0.00014503745,0.000036918806,0.0012768634,0.0003350349,0.0001035628,0.00019876144,0.0000035423402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005712568,0.000072820876,0.0061421543,0.00005113507,0.0001328369,0.0000043683112,0.0056850244,5.372763e-7,0.0004927059,0.9152006,0.07035366,0.0018070507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012171553,0.0011152751,0.06315639,0.0002826378,0.00042315858,0.0001290261,0.02635251,0.000009607433,0.0032200587,0.17211817,0.7315083,0.0004676779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000300304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004818916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7430824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033305605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004395924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47046563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084144415","doi":"10.1080/1356931032000167463","title":"Athens versus Jerusalem: a source of left-right conflict in the history of ideas","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Ideologies","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"LG Display","keywords":"Ideology; Politics; Faith; CONTEST; Secularization; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Power (physics); Creativity; Metaphor; Epistemology; Order (exchange); Aesthetics; Law; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.06180034032014073,"score_gpt":0.36211187236600534,"score_spread":0.3003115320458646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084144415","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92359024,0.0010835021,0.00029304004,0.022901969,0.0013368742,0.00009038459,0.0000025239694,0.0000134808615,0.050687965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998233,0.00026822503,0.00021325501,0.00052977196,0.00013543614,6.299372e-7,1.3677553e-7,0.000003320539,0.0006162101],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985773,0.00023329769,0.0004796333,0.000057189372,0.0003963198,0.00025623332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981373,0.0011846061,0.0002749422,0.00010897827,0.0002140226,0.00008015398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077500613,0.00006607631,0.00024593956,0.00008457706,0.00005565567,0.0000096904,0.00035479415,0.00010187303,0.00010801308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020343342,0.000043338692,0.00025521463,0.00008874041,0.0012615244,0.00012232673,0.0000238174,0.0003022996,0.0000055236505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074331736,0.00014576149,0.0016852766,0.0000106856005,0.000045616238,0.00001750113,0.053413898,0.00007253856,0.00017959978,0.93912613,0.005172962,0.0000556814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003204322,0.0011317452,0.027018975,0.00022910611,0.00016656044,0.00009023665,0.23649214,0.000008553395,0.0008019323,0.17624217,0.5543415,0.00027275775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051552737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006523236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76288396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048577943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057526276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7793266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299642622","doi":"10.1080/13569317.2015.1075262","title":"The United Nations ideology: from ideas to global policies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Ideologies","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"United Nations Development Programme","keywords":"Ideology; Global governance; Politics; Sociology; Democracy; Corporate governance; Democratic governance; Political economy; Cold war; Public administration; Political science; Global politics; Human rights; Social science; Environmental ethics; Law; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.05660565924913889,"score_gpt":0.3908240926751941,"score_spread":0.3342184334260552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299642622","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78134537,0.0003171628,0.00040939273,0.17793755,0.0009074749,0.00008065703,0.000025207875,0.00004343221,0.03893375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99465,0.00011493531,0.0008635355,0.0034475245,0.0005975729,0.0000014751406,0.0000021191463,0.0000036333186,0.000319187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979701,0.00038581772,0.0004027088,0.00009006558,0.00055028003,0.00060101575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971472,0.0011628021,0.000141254,0.00014530787,0.00082569406,0.000577735],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095776963,0.00009964533,0.00021077257,0.00023837565,0.00043990367,0.00016038991,0.00067960063,0.00013786524,0.000010442344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016323619,0.000066556415,0.00011155947,0.0011216816,0.00095717167,0.00018682911,0.00015175238,0.00021531747,0.000054383163],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026365706,0.000023308505,0.013874622,5.0639323e-7,0.000030389292,0.000014673328,0.0020236454,0.000070182745,0.0000019450058,0.9610969,0.022751313,0.00008615326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019988771,0.00013755451,0.029732844,0.000011763892,0.000032575575,0.000012719042,0.042581975,0.000024859235,0.000005324497,0.72948384,0.19768366,0.000093003655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043864388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039184473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23161307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003706876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005159309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9919623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390114718","doi":"10.1080/13569317.2023.2296395","title":"The political ideology of Turkey’s Islamist swing under Erdoğan","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Ideologies","topic":"Turkey's Politics and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Negotiation; Politics; Political economy; Political science; Accession; Economic Justice; Sociology; Law; European union; Economics; International trade","score_opus":0.045762941654249815,"score_gpt":0.3779842891967366,"score_spread":0.3322213475424868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390114718","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7661077,0.00036647922,0.00031888386,0.17516333,0.0020731664,0.000148982,0.000021726344,0.00011998444,0.055679753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959149,0.00014708177,0.0002536557,0.0013175921,0.000995991,0.0000022169254,9.219415e-7,0.000014496596,0.0013531721],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962482,0.00052605703,0.0008322945,0.00015176063,0.00069360726,0.0015480911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942661,0.0043191165,0.00027408847,0.00023497232,0.00048792842,0.00041778298],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020094407,0.00015629044,0.00045022258,0.00012409677,0.00061679754,0.00009454415,0.0007366085,0.00027353733,0.000057933194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057744863,0.00010428254,0.00041847464,0.00036168692,0.0036264136,0.0001642468,0.00020678449,0.0005375927,0.000030669424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011522829,0.000028100512,0.004182798,0.000011575105,0.000069255904,0.000028158278,0.0010059173,0.000018846553,0.00010440897,0.99040633,0.003999307,0.00013375304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002887975,0.00015615452,0.036890686,0.000030442185,0.000058872763,0.000029971085,0.07307364,0.000050903025,0.0004615138,0.87829983,0.010514132,0.00014504658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026224211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030295955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22980718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028319124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006891202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}