{"meta":{"query_hash":"09f3974acadd","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy"},"cohort_total":26,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":26,"exported":26,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/09f3974acadd","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Political+Philosophy"},"results":[{"id":"W1525843247","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9760.2010.00383.x","title":"Debate: Feasibility and Socialism*","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Socialism; Politics; Political philosophy; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.08277732688224,"score_gpt":0.3780833816609621,"score_spread":0.2953060547787221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1525843247","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05123949,0.0039374437,0.04452469,0.3328172,0.0025270248,0.00015738333,0.00022967333,0.00008871364,0.56447834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96705216,0.0007814695,0.006704543,0.005944645,0.0019338478,0.00023694886,0.00009247655,0.00008189094,0.017171979],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812367,0.0129353795,0.00054808054,0.0016357311,0.0025225752,0.0011214064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9116975,0.07476565,0.002736981,0.0046338574,0.004514038,0.0016519958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022461342,0.0005266246,0.0012075107,0.002978857,0.008372096,0.016741296,0.0026167426,0.015605668,0.023427656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07885087,0.000734033,0.0011121708,0.0024509146,0.031551253,0.023636157,0.006666386,0.010441095,0.0015563952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020203759,0.000011069342,0.000117851145,0.000019698547,0.0000041024705,0.000020822843,0.0003285359,0.00011957137,0.000019861964,0.9951415,0.0022494807,0.001947286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016470893,0.0000060081425,0.000094377094,0.000034810306,0.000004776747,0.000021802145,0.00037664804,0.0004476683,0.000046825455,0.9887016,0.010244377,0.0000046216387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017165927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012643129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023427656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045115827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063160043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11878836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1546856543","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9760.2011.00403.x","title":"Colonialism as Structural Injustice: Historical Responsibility and Contemporary Redress*","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"New Caledonia Indigenous Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Redress; Colonialism; Politics; Sociology; Economic Justice; Political science; Media studies; Law","score_opus":0.0927420900013827,"score_gpt":0.3476166441489002,"score_spread":0.2548745541475175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1546856543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1696911,0.2060054,0.0021949736,0.14517353,0.0019665626,0.000032062406,0.000051229472,0.00003132727,0.47485375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.943362,0.03953747,0.000274763,0.0043100487,0.00103908,0.000019203833,0.00001615454,0.000035792662,0.011405431],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975122,0.0014033655,0.00008970441,0.00030070735,0.00029557082,0.00039839605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99593025,0.0025125165,0.0005680814,0.00034258518,0.00033324774,0.00031323943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004530513,0.000313988,0.0003756432,0.0017857697,0.009291625,0.0096212635,0.0010065972,0.003611635,0.0026819815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00639275,0.00037621913,0.00013428896,0.0028373378,0.06627174,0.0084919855,0.005818387,0.0072453194,0.00020802408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011311984,0.000021526852,0.00076367805,0.00010150654,0.0000032720777,0.00021314631,0.19708548,0.00006325736,0.00006313429,0.78545314,0.005103656,0.011116962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010162264,0.00005056893,0.0067286566,0.0015941103,0.000009163704,0.0008703021,0.11244408,0.0002425836,0.00021974732,0.16350423,0.7142854,0.00004099816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020254305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030100912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020254305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012905253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004861187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093634605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1577460217","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12028","title":"Deliberative Voting: Clarifying Consent in a Consensus Process","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Directorate-General for Research and Innovation","keywords":"Voting; Citation; Politics; Political science; Library science; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.1099690971823124,"score_gpt":0.3876499774734843,"score_spread":0.2776808802911719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1577460217","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029341072,0.00019778877,0.9418584,0.009644949,0.00039526323,0.0010591748,0.00007578769,0.0002594423,0.017168136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5360974,0.00014296187,0.45535943,0.0013138556,0.0002647399,0.0018785892,0.0001432516,0.00013209296,0.0046676346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7627443,0.20782916,0.008045275,0.0071252,0.011096201,0.0031598469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5206098,0.4287597,0.009158822,0.02667883,0.011943524,0.0028493074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15814851,0.0010338918,0.0017058183,0.0022198828,0.0047845724,0.0075943107,0.0042334064,0.008257743,0.008822177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.34811604,0.0012980908,0.002008166,0.0019131973,0.011369065,0.012800156,0.009987238,0.008739694,0.0015435581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007444331,0.00019949354,0.001164043,0.00046960657,0.00014556352,0.00032602708,0.012255679,0.010205228,0.0021861813,0.89321214,0.004786065,0.0743055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022282118,0.000120802775,0.00028530645,0.0001779317,0.0000729338,0.000082562816,0.0011234899,0.041179843,0.0028293857,0.9465216,0.0073126266,0.00007068298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010249482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010250815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15814851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024721576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008825534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8363793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583472199","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12034","title":"On Citizenship, States, and Markets","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Politics; Citation; Political science; Law; American political science; Political philosophy; Library science; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science","score_opus":0.03802008124738713,"score_gpt":0.3237438505211521,"score_spread":0.28572376927376497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583472199","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13777094,0.028752495,0.028596763,0.14338592,0.0008610327,0.00003513839,0.00018774613,0.00003078164,0.66037923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9792398,0.0068556047,0.0012013088,0.0024778873,0.0006129465,0.00004042485,0.00003537444,0.000012794312,0.009523835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835795,0.0011033048,0.00004597386,0.00012137835,0.00017142363,0.00020004922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99482083,0.0043749595,0.00021758616,0.00020649936,0.0002528115,0.00012727553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00304749,0.00037111324,0.000695142,0.0011987288,0.0029013404,0.005551341,0.0007671096,0.0034582992,0.0060609076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005189568,0.0002619245,0.00036619484,0.0018998843,0.023591181,0.00754933,0.0023483448,0.0029655204,0.00027418399],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027117308,0.0000035333453,0.00007686301,0.0000040452214,0.000001198943,0.000009883689,0.00023905555,0.0001394779,0.000006421046,0.998307,0.0005066741,0.0007030969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028297995,0.0000026195985,0.00015269467,0.000016228543,0.0000014172705,0.0000067793367,0.0003242745,0.0001869372,0.000009937013,0.99540734,0.003886843,0.0000021157261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069873687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066292984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069873687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002931415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020630104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021269023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1933609258","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12066","title":"Interspecies Politics: Reply to <scp>H</scp>inchcliffe and <scp>L</scp>adwig","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Citation; Politics; Political philosophy; Classics; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.07353927644882724,"score_gpt":0.2858447446771747,"score_spread":0.21230546822834745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1933609258","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021713556,0.0011321694,0.00007323096,0.9890836,0.007888436,0.0000042497427,0.000027774086,0.000007717927,0.0015657567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0039610215,0.0007099197,0.00009984428,0.9811204,0.011223322,0.000027921446,0.00001789116,0.00003602448,0.0028035901],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990189,0.0026825855,0.00079950574,0.002405301,0.0022315665,0.001692121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93760073,0.04668757,0.0020354786,0.0020634474,0.008233655,0.0033791093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015607249,0.0017483359,0.0030029565,0.0024068602,0.017672818,0.016403994,0.006942855,0.11949151,0.0095383385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.069515094,0.0021792992,0.0020555768,0.0038904385,0.015803263,0.01501156,0.008051493,0.101063654,0.0053591947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002181259,0.000008151695,0.0001147648,0.000044219785,0.000011610847,0.00009985347,0.0005756076,0.000049010185,0.00004037281,0.011470315,0.9863972,0.0011670019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010697869,0.000017280343,0.0017491443,0.0008614563,0.000083508545,0.00032314623,0.0057645906,0.00056467945,0.00048296503,0.0436433,0.9461686,0.00023423946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053804778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058996093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11949151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015745688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0134439105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11424345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988064641","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9760.2007.00286.x","title":"Norms, Motives and Radical Democracy: Habermas and the Problem of Motivation*","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Council of Canadian Academies","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Citation; Politics; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.037682528554946734,"score_gpt":0.32027061022865155,"score_spread":0.2825880816737048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988064641","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1525284,0.017864974,0.08424634,0.33331114,0.0013934608,0.00008369185,0.00014459538,0.00010465053,0.41032273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9750368,0.0020726612,0.0067644496,0.0041182917,0.00062209554,0.000094168034,0.00001986128,0.000035545676,0.01123614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970163,0.0018557828,0.000097068776,0.00033930806,0.00031751834,0.0003739026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994962,0.0035127574,0.00048351823,0.00038872368,0.00040417805,0.00024872136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065061427,0.0004115535,0.0006431034,0.0010163956,0.004009718,0.0062169717,0.00096149865,0.0046590883,0.0032459015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010188788,0.00033953367,0.0004219617,0.0013692284,0.025647564,0.00890113,0.0023054816,0.005543045,0.00045326693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075766147,0.0000065306153,0.00013905464,0.0000084687435,0.0000024661297,0.000009812398,0.00037772974,0.00010549403,0.000014771259,0.996651,0.0009816732,0.0016954354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066850475,0.0000030193773,0.000118598065,0.00001065625,0.0000015210106,0.000009090554,0.00015694962,0.00023082316,0.00002046446,0.99548966,0.003949032,0.0000035103405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033441433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034996949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065061427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00268964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003056837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03440821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002183418","doi":"10.1111/1467-9760.00124","title":"Constitutionalizing the Right to Secede","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04843481092712054,"score_gpt":0.33612678477356833,"score_spread":0.2876919738464478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002183418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047778137,0.002386468,0.02967737,0.0885353,0.0015314438,0.0001304786,0.00033054414,0.00011853095,0.82951176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94782186,0.0007807733,0.0059126173,0.015448303,0.0014272929,0.00023498376,0.00010551312,0.000096573436,0.028172115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98040605,0.006882017,0.0013557841,0.003705914,0.0039923517,0.0036578502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9778978,0.01452496,0.0009910779,0.0039760834,0.0018857392,0.0007242947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023123486,0.00060044794,0.0015199974,0.0018681331,0.008141726,0.011472917,0.0029750299,0.019951778,0.00952886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0382914,0.0012337533,0.0011398302,0.0013057075,0.0427915,0.011659801,0.0058233542,0.022303175,0.001540804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005947543,0.000007147234,0.000033079566,0.0000064582014,0.000003771813,0.000010789296,0.00023893526,0.00006458549,0.00006761792,0.99784935,0.0010426489,0.0006696799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025455132,0.000009294594,0.000121740086,0.00003585609,0.000014378406,0.00002101931,0.00016730279,0.0001633152,0.00020076774,0.98583543,0.013392873,0.000012473616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00981673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011819702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023123486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047720326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010485919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.122290134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016730913","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00314.x","title":"Live‐in Domestics, Seasonal Workers, and Others Hard to Locate on the Map of Democracy*","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Citation; Democracy; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.09047791347116682,"score_gpt":0.3278057112290845,"score_spread":0.23732779775791765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016730913","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39692584,0.0012601815,0.0066034743,0.06292462,0.0008336034,0.000028338241,0.00025710286,0.00011036207,0.53105646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9624817,0.00041207005,0.00075779576,0.001999099,0.00012710354,0.000017109973,0.000056582336,0.00006135245,0.03408716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993224,0.00033217156,0.000011961319,0.0000843146,0.00006256832,0.0001867074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846774,0.00040726073,0.00019304347,0.00014057611,0.0001935231,0.0005977981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078721344,0.00022683566,0.00028698318,0.001099132,0.013431483,0.006205402,0.0006162085,0.0015074407,0.032762136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026336499,0.00017289472,0.00013326375,0.0015021639,0.010050485,0.005003694,0.004159841,0.0020132603,0.0028100049],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018051067,0.000121601566,0.04640144,0.00022152219,0.000036656133,0.0011517287,0.19944425,0.0003410441,0.0016920834,0.51027113,0.117174625,0.12296346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011826119,0.000064080385,0.023161987,0.00024111387,0.00001699505,0.0006735235,0.5161591,0.00027340717,0.000521087,0.120163806,0.3386884,0.000024610095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050453204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019964611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032762136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001158681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016398217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.109600306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115457200","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00206.x","title":"Behind Closed Doors: Publicity, Secrecy, and the Quality of Deliberation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":336,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Publicity; Deliberation; Politics; Doors; Quality (philosophy); Citation; Neutrality; Political science; Computer science; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08810405537028261,"score_gpt":0.38612284972359096,"score_spread":0.29801879435330836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115457200","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.617956,0.0041465703,0.06462677,0.072003216,0.00047277135,0.00008795253,0.00019629308,0.00011760317,0.24039276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981206,0.0001498139,0.00071302085,0.00020385903,0.000048184083,0.000008883577,0.000009449054,0.00001530641,0.00073082396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9677417,0.023047712,0.0011724199,0.001560637,0.0043675476,0.0021099322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7466441,0.20608671,0.022612976,0.013581153,0.007360925,0.0037141235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033836808,0.00033027926,0.00086057995,0.0017760432,0.0039731055,0.016802851,0.0012495148,0.005497228,0.009047565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15413722,0.00062920153,0.0006777999,0.0020354155,0.029531835,0.020392125,0.0059901257,0.0063633653,0.00057917985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042504407,0.000097644646,0.009109193,0.00010805824,0.000073322335,0.00018469483,0.02998718,0.002019248,0.0003056339,0.9374102,0.0017681398,0.018511647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057259243,0.000040291445,0.0027865944,0.000097491305,0.000032443455,0.000083591774,0.010507406,0.0020876282,0.00042423443,0.97807306,0.0057753706,0.000034469213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019541522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016559196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033836808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033115032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046688705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17894828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136636626","doi":"10.1111/1467-9760.00113","title":"Survey Article: Justifying the Truth and Reconciliation Commission","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Democracy; Human rights; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.0771066061886488,"score_gpt":0.25553872921907406,"score_spread":0.17843212303042527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136636626","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011374231,0.02990549,0.0027201506,0.61861926,0.008475705,0.00008677908,0.0003696696,0.00003603779,0.32841265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6446432,0.052936908,0.0029596442,0.16730279,0.016697139,0.00021402286,0.0006224196,0.00017060104,0.11445322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99042994,0.004755609,0.00042766717,0.00063538563,0.0028248008,0.00092663616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96580964,0.026163582,0.0011625596,0.0006504772,0.0054044435,0.0008093598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01096072,0.00027808742,0.00040011914,0.001853353,0.00499879,0.0095358025,0.00083936396,0.009748143,0.019858686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054856747,0.00022771976,0.00027780177,0.003135554,0.0055478434,0.009292652,0.0020767446,0.005995764,0.002276726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003534562,0.00002351185,0.0008087897,0.00020368419,0.00000877624,0.00007343359,0.0019988255,0.000219554,0.000057699566,0.6437498,0.3378699,0.014950681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026156391,0.000021519294,0.002154626,0.00091280276,0.000024121804,0.00010243064,0.005735918,0.0004966663,0.00026919224,0.13294466,0.8572861,0.000025848974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01594933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0151029285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019858686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010067212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0087985415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07304305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153726066","doi":"10.1111/1467-9760.00092","title":"“Two Concepts of Liberty” Through African Eyes","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"","keywords":"Sacrifice; Economic Justice; Happiness; Negative liberty; Conscience; Sociology; Politics; Law; Face (sociological concept); CLARITY; Political freedom; Law and economics; Aesthetics; Political science; Philosophy; Democracy; Social science; Theology","score_opus":0.04612343532145446,"score_gpt":0.3880059057040161,"score_spread":0.34188247038256164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153726066","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01420219,0.020189065,0.02399,0.114712454,0.0026564628,0.000054033506,0.00008829089,0.000042204,0.8240652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8052873,0.0057463036,0.011496461,0.024197064,0.001607326,0.00026475405,0.00008110112,0.000118130585,0.15120158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99584585,0.0026427428,0.000095401265,0.0003804303,0.0004927845,0.0005427815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986619,0.0007850072,0.0001147085,0.00013920305,0.00015062999,0.00014849011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044675446,0.00076557824,0.00034852998,0.0015826109,0.0078480365,0.009022568,0.0008784688,0.00490189,0.0090349885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065901093,0.00030024917,0.0005903586,0.000925955,0.036960363,0.013882612,0.00680119,0.008767531,0.0011037472],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073286033,0.0000026428097,0.000027698932,0.000008567776,8.754705e-7,0.000015154114,0.0030079125,0.000012492128,0.000019199466,0.99183875,0.0030678175,0.0019916538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014792942,0.000013413021,0.00019287554,0.00021586085,0.0000036067552,0.00010148891,0.004867625,0.00011430157,0.0001792029,0.6782694,0.31601498,0.000012405538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028921047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031288809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0090349885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005198043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031135045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03771466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154545283","doi":"10.1111/1467-9760.00126","title":"Survey Article: The Perils of Value‐Ladenness in Politics, Science and Philosophy","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Citation; Politics; Political philosophy; Philosophy of science; Library science; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.060098756666841856,"score_gpt":0.2673050642115024,"score_spread":0.20720630754466055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154545283","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015067377,0.15593986,0.0051326407,0.5431308,0.021886237,0.000036673213,0.0009583298,0.00010637208,0.25774163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44583946,0.14667147,0.002300806,0.07348368,0.06610587,0.00010155733,0.0010212974,0.00032952355,0.26414636],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986526,0.0005780718,0.000056308876,0.00020278824,0.00040074872,0.00010949844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99348265,0.004302411,0.0003506031,0.0002900062,0.0010173775,0.0005570639],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025504723,0.0002683165,0.0005892526,0.0018025057,0.0021013562,0.008878137,0.00049068104,0.0045105936,0.036494136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010973014,0.00026124038,0.00022536347,0.004579532,0.0037272237,0.009818227,0.001435295,0.0034274694,0.003639841],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056677876,0.000047987567,0.001016097,0.0002711364,0.0000119321285,0.000025998117,0.0005479289,0.00027032773,0.000112285474,0.36098793,0.5840726,0.052579086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024699171,0.000027272645,0.004621845,0.00043221525,0.0000148739655,0.00011292193,0.00095734297,0.0004514625,0.00015258024,0.26694548,0.72623515,0.000024072247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002729531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046009403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99789864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026308706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021589962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.122085035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2326125862","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9760.2010.00381.x","title":"Academic Boycotts","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Politics; Library science; Law; Sociology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.11982526005932845,"score_gpt":0.2692686367836542,"score_spread":0.14944337672432575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2326125862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016051058,0.01238475,0.00063991564,0.2751867,0.03257436,0.00003404621,0.00018141924,0.00015465252,0.67723906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018238278,0.0031874112,0.00016595346,0.03917855,0.007724173,0.000028773142,0.00006254098,0.000121346886,0.931293],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960653,0.0007696419,0.00012785534,0.00059720065,0.0017625629,0.0006773371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941164,0.0012267235,0.00028121224,0.00069543504,0.0022978224,0.0013822626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029810893,0.00080682756,0.00096227037,0.002658622,0.010378765,0.011346128,0.0014171306,0.008790041,0.20015143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014552132,0.0005482004,0.0006298994,0.0023864883,0.00480633,0.0054259165,0.0047027846,0.010595074,0.069939576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001596444,0.000014024693,0.000085777065,0.000022999737,0.000002606844,0.00005541871,0.00020109159,0.00003590732,0.000054823966,0.09110977,0.89617646,0.012225179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050161034,0.0000047523276,0.00013263493,0.000033064982,0.0000015751525,0.000018515715,0.00017316833,0.000039936618,0.000045019264,0.008034435,0.9915085,0.0000033748802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012299587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022945838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20015143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067222216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006205931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66957325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565334147","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12093","title":"Immigration, Citizenship, and Consent: What is Wrong with Permanent Alienage?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Politics; Citation; Immigration; Law; Respondent; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.0521453708720397,"score_gpt":0.3249026986403992,"score_spread":0.27275732776835954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2565334147","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027876021,0.019083703,0.0032529726,0.87527376,0.0017303756,0.000053547228,0.00005133729,0.000028269067,0.07264998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8787498,0.012208937,0.0018694856,0.09477535,0.0028635156,0.00016010005,0.000055413057,0.000033673434,0.00928377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9654289,0.026885336,0.0012195209,0.0019996967,0.0022468425,0.002219673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96785,0.025801627,0.0013882628,0.0015268534,0.0015692669,0.0018640616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031055698,0.0004577835,0.00084248336,0.001244413,0.009305471,0.010493566,0.0017334941,0.017469121,0.0037714143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05187632,0.00032671692,0.0006308919,0.0017786497,0.10112481,0.018693393,0.009220228,0.013435749,0.00050341646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002848858,0.000020668087,0.0006713345,0.00008391597,0.0000057071784,0.00024817217,0.015787553,0.00009570837,0.000030715026,0.962588,0.010228925,0.010210855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023046778,0.000025447816,0.0006210068,0.0005009966,0.000007031324,0.00028500543,0.011889238,0.00017253347,0.000056901037,0.94812703,0.038262036,0.00002974266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012360106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074537685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031055698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007292908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013604484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16424024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2577466458","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12111","title":"Public Reason and Reciprocity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Citation; Politics; Queen (butterfly); Economic Justice; Media studies; Sociology; Library science; Political science; Law; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.14683942276658368,"score_gpt":0.3790521099979908,"score_spread":0.23221268723140714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2577466458","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16810742,0.0016266697,0.039324522,0.036435876,0.0004023327,0.000110951725,0.00016406126,0.000112502545,0.75371563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859568,0.0002100838,0.0014805626,0.00044634083,0.00013718971,0.000043728116,0.00002484629,0.000027358483,0.011673142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924704,0.0040894155,0.00031094463,0.0010667425,0.0013283258,0.0007342088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9599985,0.028476022,0.0025720955,0.0045281984,0.0033159922,0.0011091912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010064329,0.00025120788,0.00070858,0.0016712315,0.002757709,0.006201821,0.0006539745,0.0041586524,0.018359259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044421878,0.00034983424,0.00054081826,0.0010113443,0.009824107,0.0062857936,0.0027976315,0.003044164,0.0015776084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026016813,0.00003336479,0.0012698084,0.000023805547,0.000018419183,0.00003740798,0.001312059,0.0003131839,0.00006933583,0.98952943,0.0015382658,0.0058289375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002493303,0.000013628858,0.0012941873,0.000022010203,0.000022634722,0.000059625847,0.0007239841,0.00071001146,0.000108104876,0.9853855,0.0116265435,0.000008823334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001196579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013013924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018359259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019352942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020985033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061417878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792894343","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12156","title":"The Taking of Territory and the Wrongs of Colonialism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Politics; Miller; Art history; Classics; Media studies; History; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04882915810236784,"score_gpt":0.3539527504512712,"score_spread":0.3051235923489034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792894343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09415116,0.00901897,0.004981152,0.15987858,0.00079433114,0.0000200485,0.000054010805,0.000021751857,0.73107994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98598504,0.00091414904,0.00043368258,0.0032928109,0.00023968173,0.000013294214,0.000005654423,0.000025804733,0.009089835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908359,0.006012643,0.00020336329,0.0007172766,0.00083409564,0.0013966868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99118865,0.00547285,0.00057700113,0.0013416024,0.0007559122,0.00066409673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008775533,0.0002810168,0.0008283281,0.0012660109,0.012569528,0.01107146,0.0011946111,0.008243303,0.005368289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015883395,0.00043892083,0.00043061023,0.0013617442,0.11344663,0.01155144,0.0066147125,0.00945719,0.00036765423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007745084,0.000003409321,0.00013988678,0.000008473859,0.000002963335,0.00005596151,0.006199073,0.000057755322,0.000018663526,0.9913965,0.0011506762,0.0009589197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000147476685,0.0000040625764,0.0004053687,0.00007659162,0.0000063328353,0.000089918896,0.005575184,0.00014918968,0.00004972385,0.9641787,0.029439716,0.000010483474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027834183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0326677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027834183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006427545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005501518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055344343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2939881950","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12184","title":"Debate: In Defence of Fiscal Autonomy: A Reply to Risse and Meyer","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Autonomy; Politics; Political philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03834459464901945,"score_gpt":0.3369274046972666,"score_spread":0.29858281004824716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2939881950","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022147602,0.0016030715,0.00012915242,0.9936225,0.0028461486,0.0000018750269,0.000013938489,0.0000035503965,0.001558251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017373862,0.0015242163,0.00032162663,0.95860744,0.019233944,0.000028329188,0.000019071955,0.00005044467,0.0028410952],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9792991,0.009004534,0.0012008621,0.003891589,0.0043468126,0.0022570794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9229342,0.059334613,0.003580143,0.0020110237,0.009295794,0.002844266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029632855,0.0015154709,0.0028623096,0.0027054236,0.013012655,0.020336812,0.008750995,0.1268106,0.008227082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11356664,0.0011505235,0.002400849,0.0044843275,0.029136915,0.027237993,0.009273256,0.09929152,0.0037394504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007744382,0.000023015988,0.00018345514,0.00011788419,0.000042311698,0.00015824052,0.003981264,0.0001291189,0.00008235601,0.25971416,0.73140913,0.0040816376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017602602,0.000020838846,0.00068320066,0.0010640798,0.00008377841,0.00018192621,0.005379599,0.0004498966,0.00036650742,0.3628611,0.62858784,0.00014517362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018442992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017288182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1268106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01197722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014251723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1567154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944706828","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12187","title":"Why Moral Reasoning Is Insufficient for Moral Progress","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Queen (butterfly); Sociology; Moral philosophy; Moral reasoning; Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Library science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07607932952111218,"score_gpt":0.36283140987503076,"score_spread":0.2867520803539186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944706828","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06315864,0.0033842071,0.040013958,0.29887426,0.0015165986,0.00010971221,0.00035377085,0.00040616893,0.5921828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96908575,0.0006386322,0.011365167,0.010077852,0.0003903285,0.0001280289,0.00011770595,0.00019021131,0.00800626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98522943,0.0070820916,0.0008243278,0.0017375477,0.0032500168,0.0018765595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9248844,0.047758054,0.0039113783,0.008908125,0.010846465,0.0036916367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023969373,0.00046687832,0.0010786564,0.0023656692,0.0036641452,0.008587097,0.0020634474,0.012743142,0.020330256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0883382,0.00089707045,0.00115294,0.0010675493,0.023663584,0.016003087,0.005161437,0.011552415,0.0046328017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003226447,0.000034309858,0.00047045163,0.00007466569,0.00002337528,0.00010722819,0.0009017243,0.0005281526,0.000109253226,0.9859126,0.0063437307,0.005462216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015632293,0.0000032660491,0.00016075636,0.000031737927,0.000005300401,0.000035459307,0.00022596092,0.00042071418,0.000079258956,0.9939719,0.005043958,0.000005981111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019611574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013216264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023969373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003544105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054749264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12676364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124854515","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9760.2012.00419.x","title":"Tax Competition and Global Background Justice*","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; German; Political science; Sociology; Humanities; Library science; Art history; Social science; History; Law; Art","score_opus":0.04558289261917025,"score_gpt":0.27654574561830386,"score_spread":0.2309628529991336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124854515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08796738,0.0040864903,0.0028709373,0.054593522,0.0005601859,0.000011454654,0.000052877258,0.000019107036,0.84983814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96133375,0.000883323,0.00028878305,0.004626865,0.0002927525,0.0000071990908,0.000016800406,0.000023933091,0.03252639],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917775,0.00027324606,0.00001807646,0.000112202535,0.00014161172,0.00027702545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991001,0.0003803512,0.00012958334,0.000090636895,0.00015687168,0.00014254017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011071023,0.00020570807,0.00028892496,0.0006946331,0.0037105198,0.00655133,0.0002979201,0.0025103947,0.007807478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018586258,0.00011833168,0.00020561494,0.0010323919,0.008470116,0.002926227,0.0019207726,0.0052139587,0.00040538513],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006536498,0.000007116458,0.00025964066,0.0000064080964,0.0000029057528,0.000020896136,0.00052311213,0.00008336578,0.000038076494,0.9943545,0.0022361486,0.0024613144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011325133,0.000015213784,0.0029195498,0.00006646078,0.0000114139575,0.00008898933,0.0016254144,0.00029962006,0.00019048224,0.89918786,0.095572114,0.000011590373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072932816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0123948455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007807478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029333585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020033275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026118577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212765476","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12267","title":"Critical‐level Sufficientarianism*","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Japan Securities Scholarship Foundation","keywords":"Geology","score_opus":0.12056038532284971,"score_gpt":0.3883202821957024,"score_spread":0.26775989687285273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212765476","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031293914,0.0021461833,0.4490709,0.0090382565,0.00031094128,0.00011397554,0.00038135343,0.0002673814,0.5073771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90338665,0.0007804671,0.05233299,0.0026050054,0.00033382693,0.00022640139,0.0002550128,0.00023773318,0.039842017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808085,0.000583902,0.00009032304,0.00044702896,0.00052442716,0.00027344582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984517,0.0005841107,0.00018764903,0.00026991966,0.00036795717,0.00013867747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027516598,0.00046418206,0.00054722937,0.0015857145,0.0018637957,0.003174069,0.00087955507,0.001471189,0.0103021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00370979,0.00027946313,0.0010591324,0.0009342952,0.008985637,0.004334308,0.0025887364,0.0029834586,0.00156705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002581862,0.0000026959008,0.00006682853,0.00001190067,0.000002783765,0.0000073256047,0.00008029602,0.00016827004,0.000081223,0.99745506,0.0007363832,0.0013845093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055488845,0.0000093663375,0.0002000298,0.000017082495,0.0000037644224,0.000041074007,0.000056901154,0.00097420294,0.00018418577,0.9777763,0.02072648,0.00000520563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010445361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013476721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0103021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033215708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016578663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034463942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234157206","doi":"10.1111/1467-9760.00091","title":"Pornographies","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Pornography; Virtue; Autonomy; Paternalism; Democracy; Law; Sociology; Censorship; Legislation; Politics; Morality; Political science","score_opus":0.02482496454297656,"score_gpt":0.3132600199931451,"score_spread":0.28843505545016856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234157206","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007520442,0.0017201015,0.0012859851,0.006392851,0.0010805951,0.00005928645,0.00037576773,0.00014252453,0.9814224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09484702,0.0015124428,0.00051147916,0.0058442648,0.00045844828,0.000055490043,0.00036787218,0.00014041626,0.8962626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983707,0.00033550616,0.00008791972,0.0003362419,0.0005587513,0.00031089317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985324,0.00037630988,0.00016508637,0.00039397163,0.00038948294,0.00014266232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011127621,0.00038798622,0.00028858113,0.0011740095,0.0056782886,0.0032724317,0.0006978742,0.002124209,0.11075559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004599041,0.0002810621,0.00026438604,0.001284,0.003925431,0.0036336177,0.0036014463,0.0028858958,0.022609496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043570253,0.000041254087,0.0011220542,0.00017746248,0.000009679052,0.0005898364,0.0074536297,0.000083199746,0.00056805054,0.63182384,0.27701893,0.081068456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014048791,0.000008209884,0.0005758516,0.000054711294,0.0000019066781,0.00017071317,0.0008326408,0.000016739985,0.00013934798,0.0039640116,0.9942298,0.0000046713108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050372127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074744797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11075559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018929166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001718626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3705144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324082223","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12292","title":"Contractualist alternatives to the veil of ignorance","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.09037659743959713,"score_gpt":0.39520443712622433,"score_spread":0.3048278396866272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324082223","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017875683,0.0032032407,0.14860784,0.11231148,0.0008057669,0.00013077541,0.00015902129,0.00015801884,0.7167482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90956366,0.0013612956,0.023512786,0.015423726,0.0014668512,0.0005475915,0.000095245465,0.00020116178,0.04782773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97853106,0.010477561,0.0008578413,0.0037379416,0.004153833,0.0022418576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98546034,0.0070957392,0.0012459683,0.003551045,0.0017661453,0.0008807283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022722611,0.0009863405,0.0011067342,0.0017968041,0.007485528,0.011845394,0.004692888,0.012151708,0.012551697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02637754,0.0008095912,0.001552527,0.0016837952,0.072034866,0.018150358,0.010527417,0.014833097,0.0014250604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002067594,0.0000018667438,0.00000906154,0.0000034264508,0.0000010053687,0.000007094979,0.00017658711,0.00007056674,0.0000055970468,0.99918574,0.0002507505,0.00028609717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066602365,0.0000023245789,0.000010957243,0.000012349331,0.0000013883064,0.000010326029,0.000070941234,0.00025528143,0.00001580688,0.9929998,0.00661061,0.0000035589994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063051083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041521783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022722611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011745569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0084281545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12017012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386738352","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12308","title":"Privacy, Publicity, and the Right to Be Forgotten","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Publicity; Right to be forgotten; Internet privacy; Right to privacy; The Right to Privacy; Political science; Computer science; Law; Data Protection Act 1998; Human rights","score_opus":0.050269069491993806,"score_gpt":0.33326786784243795,"score_spread":0.28299879835044417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386738352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021056063,0.021298861,0.022957848,0.3559517,0.0022093812,0.000077934434,0.00023756585,0.00016808062,0.57604253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8113286,0.01324609,0.006207263,0.07236742,0.0030956517,0.00019699203,0.00015428055,0.00018973557,0.09321401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9642016,0.020029547,0.0015741072,0.004065189,0.0063110376,0.0038184947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95515037,0.026295543,0.004025766,0.0099987015,0.0023216107,0.0022080385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021509882,0.0005782697,0.0008904308,0.0011662262,0.010091411,0.020765727,0.0022736704,0.016992692,0.011510151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0465405,0.0008381663,0.0007767096,0.0023208272,0.067941956,0.028171768,0.013192724,0.016192576,0.0029166664],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012824282,0.000010042795,0.00021121265,0.000034506294,0.000005571987,0.000084810505,0.004569681,0.000064739,0.000049725135,0.9800464,0.00800759,0.006902889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015537145,0.000032577707,0.00045793297,0.0006570856,0.0000149675125,0.00048642268,0.0046475837,0.0001736564,0.00029437162,0.7310578,0.26211587,0.00004603974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068477327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044394224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021509882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041672336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007920526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11375654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387004773","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12311","title":"Debate: Political Authority, Functionalism, and the Problem of Annexation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law and economics; Jurisdiction; Law; Annexation; State (computer science); Political science; Democracy; Functionalism (philosophy of mind); Order (exchange); Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.06938441978727689,"score_gpt":0.3530540322368549,"score_spread":0.283669612449578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387004773","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072810985,0.013932625,0.06906278,0.27231443,0.0013394303,0.000074704716,0.00012144463,0.00010077575,0.5702428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96125025,0.002024527,0.0070699067,0.008485138,0.0014524877,0.000114132985,0.000056633602,0.00008519265,0.019461617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98723865,0.008048762,0.00038919505,0.0016452421,0.0013914721,0.0012867615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98694825,0.01011096,0.0006729961,0.0009590926,0.0008293363,0.00047938354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022006199,0.00046073893,0.0011591541,0.0018859799,0.009746279,0.011137935,0.0035536503,0.014374199,0.007257925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028574293,0.00044239665,0.0010144647,0.0018202462,0.0546933,0.021364091,0.0050278846,0.0123513425,0.0007687485],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034440309,0.0000018748063,0.000031903168,0.0000031148368,6.407736e-7,0.0000083956675,0.00031425589,0.00007479145,0.000007604264,0.9983277,0.0004552197,0.0007710086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007045336,0.0000032381097,0.0000678368,0.000028559176,0.0000016289148,0.000013255917,0.00026931748,0.0003870734,0.00003126887,0.9906893,0.008497468,0.0000041172907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00708495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057446226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022006199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008277025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006883817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11638129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387079017","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12310","title":"The Epistemic Dimensions of Civil Disobedience","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil disobedience; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06907300815863618,"score_gpt":0.35953816627926544,"score_spread":0.29046515812062923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387079017","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05324285,0.0046098013,0.026716312,0.077072226,0.0006192715,0.00006334044,0.00006966579,0.000080747544,0.8375257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843604,0.0007768457,0.0015644524,0.0053788363,0.00026532344,0.000060510985,0.000024524872,0.00006333495,0.0075059063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9697929,0.020284897,0.0008541834,0.0027878378,0.00346616,0.0028139143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9417595,0.04277937,0.0043054265,0.0046342537,0.003815028,0.0027063733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021313457,0.00084854953,0.0005366535,0.0025362582,0.020352965,0.018666804,0.0021622672,0.010027511,0.009258298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047656883,0.00078746636,0.0006065409,0.0014939415,0.108216256,0.023996295,0.014346771,0.01250155,0.0010901561],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016621547,0.000014666592,0.0005218676,0.000041739408,0.000006757536,0.0001955771,0.065577805,0.000105930594,0.00007308126,0.92823106,0.0026498868,0.002565027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019462395,0.000015874915,0.0004388862,0.0002552419,0.000010381716,0.0003354842,0.028579852,0.0003669592,0.0001790041,0.8769559,0.09280409,0.00003882445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007920004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005332835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021313457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00970288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005534107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11271769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387671359","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12313","title":"The challenge of policing minorities in a liberal society","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Normative; Politics; Political science; Neglect; Subject (documents); Law; Undue influence; Perception; Criminology; Sociology; Law and economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.08309903948348975,"score_gpt":0.36300244201866533,"score_spread":0.2799034025351756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387671359","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042079765,0.0021551342,0.0038424623,0.60769147,0.00088914257,0.000029000443,0.00001798269,0.00002597308,0.34326914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91720086,0.0014308947,0.0021424636,0.03927603,0.0011925936,0.000072957315,0.0000133976455,0.000041821295,0.038629092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99286336,0.0044625956,0.00010063809,0.0004397209,0.0009668363,0.0011668318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953791,0.0018411851,0.00045737784,0.0003591438,0.0004775705,0.00148555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061739287,0.0003848189,0.00031646737,0.00078696787,0.022614408,0.0124242585,0.0014598707,0.0066780346,0.0036206774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007637929,0.00027241162,0.0003207906,0.00067559717,0.03542593,0.0052151415,0.0089897355,0.010328829,0.0009870972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009479678,0.00002178043,0.00046676368,0.000013597491,0.000003100745,0.00008225274,0.0096552465,0.00024841592,0.000068486785,0.9718085,0.0105797695,0.007042621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016095872,0.000018264145,0.00045791143,0.00011448823,0.0000035456942,0.0000816579,0.014739854,0.00063068233,0.00014358247,0.86149627,0.12227994,0.000017803699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0121084135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01286333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022614408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008123414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0152020855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058939755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}