{"meta":{"query_hash":"09f3974acadd","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy"},"cohort_total":26,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":26,"exported":26,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/09f3974acadd","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Political+Philosophy"},"results":[{"id":"W1525843247","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9760.2010.00383.x","title":"Debate: Feasibility and Socialism*","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Socialism; Politics; Political philosophy; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.08277732688224,"score_gpt":0.3780833816609621,"score_spread":0.2953060547787221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1525843247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5133258,0.0001468088,0.00006539666,0.1748618,0.0016556949,0.00013939386,0.000021436437,0.00003919433,0.30974442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898362,0.000021834921,0.0005385668,0.0036615592,0.0058826604,6.907284e-7,3.7926347e-7,0.000011189856,0.000046912945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978508,0.00026690072,0.0004734394,0.00015012013,0.0006410991,0.00061763794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976305,0.00075342547,0.00014437626,0.00015328814,0.0004024633,0.0009159867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017650657,0.00012795071,0.00030404632,0.00009593759,0.00042345494,0.00007814636,0.00030267498,0.00032945693,0.00015978333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040098466,0.0001097911,0.00018104629,0.00013519978,0.002205424,0.00036334665,0.000055501434,0.0012615159,0.000022367432],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024672285,0.00010999844,0.0014232176,0.000017494796,0.000015480911,0.00002451938,0.0007003954,3.1927758e-8,0.00015536943,0.99716026,0.00021090325,0.00015766294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033347093,0.00009200682,0.0044507585,0.000015438412,0.00003548875,0.000033576718,0.00018467223,0.0000015930418,0.00008258044,0.98572487,0.008921956,0.00012356773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002318501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007170782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47651038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010385568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043856387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8125977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1546856543","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9760.2011.00403.x","title":"Colonialism as Structural Injustice: Historical Responsibility and Contemporary Redress*","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"New Caledonia Indigenous Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Redress; Colonialism; Politics; Sociology; Economic Justice; Political science; Media studies; Law","score_opus":0.0927420900013827,"score_gpt":0.3476166441489002,"score_spread":0.2548745541475175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1546856543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79761565,0.0011154363,0.000009152109,0.017022276,0.0012014642,0.00021005691,0.000011778853,0.00003183001,0.18278234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965735,0.000022720884,0.00055758434,0.00082407385,0.0017575724,0.0000017231345,2.0040284e-7,0.000012774024,0.00024987158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975029,0.0005205605,0.00062883797,0.00018943341,0.0006390248,0.00051922613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997909,0.0005157801,0.00028550345,0.00016017712,0.00046781375,0.0006616878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001196211,0.00015353865,0.00044179626,0.00014641845,0.0005860048,0.000032973407,0.00029333023,0.00016394579,0.000098824836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025846676,0.00012828968,0.000142743,0.00015340335,0.0010506038,0.00030921356,0.00009497846,0.00045146936,0.000012066424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005882858,0.00013167357,0.0074768523,0.000025258814,0.000059280104,0.0002447618,0.017675275,2.1375666e-8,0.000043894615,0.9721996,0.0014722951,0.00008277807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067060353,0.0011416582,0.02596699,0.00004087555,0.00008263669,0.00009627645,0.0018677552,5.897038e-7,0.00008766081,0.9592398,0.0105986865,0.00020649322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048414073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013167108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19895782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008920096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008290436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7318792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1577460217","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12028","title":"Deliberative Voting: Clarifying Consent in a Consensus Process","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Directorate-General for Research and Innovation","keywords":"Voting; Citation; Politics; Political science; Library science; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.1099690971823124,"score_gpt":0.3876499774734843,"score_spread":0.2776808802911719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1577460217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3758787,0.00019970359,0.0001342526,0.2629448,0.0005791549,0.00040591956,0.000009205461,0.00004005708,0.3598082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919977,0.000007017828,0.00039532204,0.005746275,0.0017743608,0.0000062281665,4.2634431e-7,0.000015419977,0.000057253597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99669164,0.00057235506,0.00087215134,0.0001797406,0.0007677463,0.0009163888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99609613,0.0018427082,0.00024244642,0.00010695039,0.00080507237,0.0009066724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011393521,0.00017685356,0.00042578782,0.00023854128,0.00025694663,0.000099811776,0.00033238038,0.00030602096,0.00018249513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051565845,0.00015310556,0.00018049145,0.00031409477,0.0013287094,0.00033132778,0.00003841618,0.0012745764,0.00009664826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025819492,0.0001824955,0.001437577,0.000048237052,0.000023135528,0.00007554248,0.002498979,0.000009996546,0.000032973803,0.99532706,0.00028306697,0.000055102886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058686157,0.0001361931,0.001713073,0.0001989419,0.000021702697,0.000036609337,0.0020196172,0.00006125035,0.00009760754,0.9944332,0.00051052065,0.0001844239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090956973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007762256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.616119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002983666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010117178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6243464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583472199","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12034","title":"On Citizenship, States, and Markets","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Politics; Citation; Political science; Law; American political science; Political philosophy; Library science; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science","score_opus":0.03802008124738713,"score_gpt":0.3237438505211521,"score_spread":0.28572376927376497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583472199","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.095820226,0.000093926865,0.00024999518,0.1391453,0.0007767029,0.00008056853,0.000014324041,0.000030736785,0.7637882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846168,0.000040800624,0.00019003628,0.01104477,0.0040003303,6.464396e-7,6.343997e-7,0.0000135658065,0.00009237957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975338,0.00057531917,0.00041940456,0.00014311113,0.0007042223,0.0006241409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960305,0.0024128195,0.0001273067,0.00013547276,0.00022473896,0.0010691447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018096988,0.00013689457,0.00029828254,0.00014045688,0.00028963937,0.00006665003,0.00024048504,0.00018445593,0.00010511305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004233242,0.00011386097,0.00013229465,0.000110747205,0.0010232243,0.00013100276,0.00003673708,0.0006518221,0.000042051015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069119604,0.000056452187,0.00011162495,0.000022105218,0.000022054921,0.000017050415,0.00027898973,8.034494e-7,0.00000483923,0.9975191,0.0016464662,0.0002514211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041675035,0.00033216705,0.0014680175,0.000078396035,0.000027742833,0.000014775053,0.00008846133,0.000014567721,0.000025350559,0.98757106,0.009832962,0.00012976235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005523363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000035186044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8887966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000109121174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012403956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5067892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1933609258","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12066","title":"Interspecies Politics: Reply to <scp>H</scp>inchcliffe and <scp>L</scp>adwig","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Philosophical Ethics and Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Citation; Politics; Political philosophy; Classics; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.07353927644882724,"score_gpt":0.2858447446771747,"score_spread":0.21230546822834745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1933609258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25054216,0.0010467141,0.00008842915,0.0629851,0.0020380807,0.00022339921,0.00015119265,0.00007902023,0.6828459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9593198,0.000025676476,0.00018837203,0.02643938,0.012051713,0.0000046923587,0.0000037067377,0.00006386471,0.0019028104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99637514,0.00024090674,0.0010765204,0.00037016746,0.00095143064,0.000985816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99331754,0.0025117006,0.00034617004,0.00040832208,0.0011615187,0.0022547175],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011697242,0.00041612674,0.00078147,0.000491792,0.00028487368,0.00041214802,0.0005753876,0.0001908295,0.000058446505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00871055,0.00033074865,0.00034321824,0.000098614924,0.0013693045,0.00048097523,0.00032333986,0.0011909717,0.0002265894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014146796,0.00021687179,0.00004978171,0.000067670066,0.00012622048,0.00011176893,0.011230019,0.0000015020469,0.000032087697,0.971571,0.016547268,0.000031606232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006224909,0.00086450233,0.00008003615,0.00014424558,0.0000751888,0.00011815684,0.004981322,0.000008395839,0.00012008779,0.7123353,0.28057674,0.00007356043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008937213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000084154735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7087776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021073344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002388766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988064641","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9760.2007.00286.x","title":"Norms, Motives and Radical Democracy: Habermas and the Problem of Motivation*","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Council of Canadian Academies","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Citation; Politics; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.037682528554946734,"score_gpt":0.32027061022865155,"score_spread":0.2825880816737048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988064641","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3318773,0.0011341986,0.001427037,0.39820898,0.000239742,0.00038436413,0.000017151167,0.000024385397,0.26668686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99521315,0.00008305483,0.0011670925,0.0020709154,0.00142079,5.182789e-7,3.0216455e-7,0.000008751052,0.000035448844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771917,0.00032379825,0.0006829565,0.000119994074,0.0006608879,0.0004932206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99521905,0.0035313219,0.00024399118,0.000093154165,0.00030702938,0.00060546625],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032049718,0.00012344097,0.00036775027,0.00012247004,0.00037009094,0.000036664347,0.00022018063,0.00018059736,0.000017523527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023081123,0.000078604564,0.00012673675,0.00017374905,0.005521748,0.0003097621,0.00006698312,0.000618201,0.0000016540521],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014127721,0.00008041998,0.0028828431,0.00004400474,0.00004216224,0.000010315518,0.001976339,3.753433e-7,0.000024016794,0.99440926,0.000044515426,0.00034447687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010522071,0.00012242037,0.01774709,0.000071223636,0.000058924954,0.000032511936,0.00048458533,0.000005044435,0.00010657357,0.9786908,0.0015436106,0.00008502864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017368271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010639789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6633358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060016755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017652336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99718463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002183418","doi":"10.1111/1467-9760.00124","title":"Constitutionalizing the Right to Secede","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04843481092712054,"score_gpt":0.33612678477356833,"score_spread":0.2876919738464478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002183418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01399421,0.0002928148,0.0006508737,0.23038846,0.0008421276,0.000078620455,0.0000047622675,0.000011242616,0.7537369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873604,0.00003302389,0.0001201599,0.00678092,0.00560363,0.0000015583761,1.5163549e-7,0.0000023254522,0.00009779579],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998699,0.00009984944,0.00026974283,0.00006806988,0.0005438799,0.00031943468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989867,0.0002832963,0.000072136165,0.000056008616,0.0003039819,0.00029782718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005118099,0.00006839691,0.00014715079,0.00006182015,0.0008188651,0.000038757116,0.00024673966,0.00003892999,0.00020438767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071945455,0.000042025044,0.00012613875,0.00023015123,0.0010270391,0.0001345911,0.000038932103,0.00017107383,0.00010422789],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017172903,0.000035027453,0.0011340583,7.8377036e-7,0.00002755688,0.00002930148,0.00027432322,0.000005478988,0.000016289485,0.9958051,0.002569523,0.00008538874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008444618,0.000031162304,0.0017155663,0.000024793166,0.000017495784,0.000043652177,0.0003250339,2.5901022e-7,0.000010622455,0.6465161,0.35118246,0.00004843251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063018745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015336089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9733662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001481071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033197715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6298131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016730913","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00314.x","title":"Live‐in Domestics, Seasonal Workers, and Others Hard to Locate on the Map of Democracy*","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Citation; Democracy; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.09047791347116682,"score_gpt":0.3278057112290845,"score_spread":0.23732779775791765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016730913","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4497159,0.000182569,0.00007699103,0.5011173,0.00040930696,0.00020067542,0.000024182327,0.000011801626,0.04826129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99109346,0.000027036473,0.00038308007,0.007019803,0.0013345039,0.0000012925293,2.0192905e-7,0.000012960897,0.00012764645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975856,0.0003782287,0.00051500194,0.0001511189,0.00078377145,0.0005862639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99688125,0.001848942,0.0001414143,0.00015441608,0.00023020327,0.0007437859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011892268,0.00014546969,0.00034350375,0.0001507827,0.00027542736,0.000022221113,0.00036725734,0.00015559557,0.00009308838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021886895,0.00010267668,0.0001501321,0.00019584762,0.0016514669,0.00013290968,0.000051746036,0.00068920024,0.000063159016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000121237514,0.00014150307,0.006101336,0.000021302032,0.000026902344,0.000069232505,0.0019215345,0.0000187676,0.000014141976,0.99031895,0.0012053765,0.000039727805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003404032,0.0003111348,0.017596878,0.0002071366,0.000022830074,0.000021375514,0.00068222225,0.000010756616,0.000052717238,0.97896767,0.0016577245,0.00012918026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029890044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012245729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54137754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015904199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037677327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6084899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115457200","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00206.x","title":"Behind Closed Doors: Publicity, Secrecy, and the Quality of Deliberation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":336,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Publicity; Deliberation; Politics; Doors; Quality (philosophy); Citation; Neutrality; Political science; Computer science; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08810405537028261,"score_gpt":0.38612284972359096,"score_spread":0.29801879435330836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115457200","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41023293,0.0002941077,0.0008597056,0.4184818,0.00045438754,0.000252548,0.00002775896,0.000021036696,0.16937575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933294,0.000039734205,0.00033635582,0.0040563582,0.0022090143,0.0000013391547,9.543437e-7,0.0000086689315,0.00001817941],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967575,0.0007823463,0.00091374246,0.00012534927,0.0009738782,0.00044717564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969521,0.0014090558,0.00036042882,0.00016404253,0.00059546676,0.0005188759],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040461267,0.0001272606,0.00043259744,0.0001077286,0.00034145714,0.00008660903,0.00034632327,0.00021803362,0.000031201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004426338,0.00008524742,0.00025157092,0.00015535191,0.0028465725,0.0004898895,0.00006637108,0.00064634654,0.000005412844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014532718,0.00013362875,0.00014212748,0.000033345783,0.00003907473,0.0000033918275,0.0024287938,0.0000054780135,0.000041571493,0.99691194,0.000022739227,0.00009259814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001986739,0.00012507218,0.0029223228,0.000050998697,0.00004787299,0.000009972703,0.0003839341,0.0000027469791,0.0001755889,0.9938064,0.00039119562,0.00009710853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016700004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010509422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5830965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014701732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005004216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136636626","doi":"10.1111/1467-9760.00113","title":"Survey Article: Justifying the Truth and Reconciliation Commission","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Democracy; Human rights; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.0771066061886488,"score_gpt":0.25553872921907406,"score_spread":0.17843212303042527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136636626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5379388,0.00063751696,0.00005021951,0.023187896,0.0010776023,0.000105426225,0.000074780255,0.000029258,0.4368985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99569875,0.000011074995,0.000015497171,0.0010217124,0.0014986309,6.6748777e-7,0.000002117957,0.000008946803,0.0017426088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988225,0.00018326288,0.00043282754,0.0000844765,0.00023376172,0.00024317614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986405,0.00074586674,0.000081416314,0.00010226223,0.00014645528,0.00028354197],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004173071,0.000099544224,0.00019362495,0.000038977763,0.0002534869,0.000084105435,0.00012934583,0.000041474614,0.0010229825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003460219,0.00005809172,0.00008261982,0.000033049346,0.0003393897,0.0002256745,0.000014873924,0.00028926518,0.000045824752],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053701722,0.00006242431,0.00031285506,0.000014344254,0.000015469393,0.0000067915103,0.00063316897,0.0000013719497,0.0000029184062,0.9946035,0.0006547368,0.0036386955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008955449,0.00055905705,0.024015961,0.00010045551,0.00009794396,0.00005497688,0.0003953562,0.0017471107,0.000013349728,0.7313822,0.24045803,0.00027999465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017856475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017502058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45775995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006016686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035614295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153726066","doi":"10.1111/1467-9760.00092","title":"“Two Concepts of Liberty” Through African Eyes","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"","keywords":"Sacrifice; Economic Justice; Happiness; Negative liberty; Conscience; Sociology; Politics; Law; Face (sociological concept); CLARITY; Political freedom; Law and economics; Aesthetics; Political science; Philosophy; Democracy; Social science; Theology","score_opus":0.04612343532145446,"score_gpt":0.3880059057040161,"score_spread":0.34188247038256164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153726066","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06936702,0.0003819499,0.00004214227,0.02920562,0.0003093933,0.00009168267,0.000025105937,0.00002032208,0.90055674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935475,0.000055758945,0.00063663453,0.0019064333,0.0035466733,0.0000010630579,6.518474e-7,0.000015055183,0.0002902463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735594,0.00048794568,0.0007260107,0.00014607329,0.0007294885,0.000554524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978953,0.0009155612,0.00016470937,0.0001837179,0.00030360612,0.0005371197],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007129303,0.00015295435,0.00047558194,0.00019885377,0.00020128349,0.000033314485,0.00046653324,0.000121381454,0.0035225719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000581155,0.0001279832,0.0003750789,0.0007844795,0.0017502146,0.00043712402,0.00002598767,0.000385043,0.00008333205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014830579,0.0002459263,0.00008540892,0.000019981357,0.00003989986,0.000037480462,0.0019527001,0.0000033435406,0.000061623534,0.9959007,0.00021173929,0.001292895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052009244,0.00030803468,0.00009783221,0.00008180311,0.000053968477,0.000018461586,0.00050516764,0.0000012286733,0.0004110482,0.9376008,0.060264274,0.00013731711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016628968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000027242777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92418045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000077245066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015392828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99738836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154545283","doi":"10.1111/1467-9760.00126","title":"Survey Article: The Perils of Value‐Ladenness in Politics, Science and Philosophy","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Citation; Politics; Political philosophy; Philosophy of science; Library science; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.060098756666841856,"score_gpt":0.2673050642115024,"score_spread":0.20720630754466055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154545283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93210375,0.0007990777,0.000114629045,0.00798801,0.0003772704,0.00008462286,0.0000788221,0.000003682833,0.058450155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986049,0.000063555235,0.000070858194,0.0007946984,0.0004354276,0.0000012162508,4.900455e-7,0.000009039898,0.000019799676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821764,0.000063082756,0.0010209901,0.00018885884,0.000089485904,0.00041991405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986503,0.00029584038,0.00036752538,0.00025008494,0.00018936602,0.0002468895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002928174,0.000116873576,0.00041362687,0.00041305347,0.00014967438,0.000048016373,0.00041847787,0.0000644938,0.00006733902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017093567,0.000098688884,0.00009239673,0.00045609436,0.0016054689,0.0005338818,0.00008178979,0.0002934988,0.00002767097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022805765,0.00011531533,0.074134484,0.000013364973,0.000014648598,0.0000068740983,0.00012311319,0.000025904157,0.000024409579,0.92547786,0.000013548689,0.000027667913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043329893,0.000099327364,0.20606369,0.000030796247,0.0000052045148,0.00007120373,0.00005106907,0.00023430257,0.00010376728,0.7923164,0.0004966542,0.00009430702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019609067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000070641245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13316149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018486311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001366079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5915417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2326125862","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9760.2010.00381.x","title":"Academic Boycotts","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Politics; Library science; Law; Sociology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.11982526005932845,"score_gpt":0.2692686367836542,"score_spread":0.14944337672432575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2326125862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62471235,0.000050221795,0.000106393345,0.020451993,0.0028944106,0.00008344933,0.0000015813748,0.000033449945,0.35166612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97574,0.0000017796119,0.0000878225,0.010577662,0.01344626,5.228264e-7,0.000001001858,0.000017032775,0.00012790303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881643,0.000007864797,0.00041817635,0.00009239343,0.00032279783,0.00034234882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928284,0.00006223216,0.00019356761,0.00011003727,0.00029446126,0.000056845336],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033961792,0.000119386656,0.00019614042,0.0002272534,0.000085453714,0.000067198715,0.00034102096,0.00014020399,0.0007935498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007214491,0.00008397758,0.00015185153,0.00015424898,0.00010564318,0.00077821047,0.00007662152,0.0011174009,0.0010137276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007012112,0.00006868258,0.0018870241,0.000049860682,0.000020227408,0.00003434235,0.000011667787,8.792125e-7,0.0036175794,0.9865983,0.0071471184,0.0004941736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058753503,0.00005439204,0.003946774,0.00006908754,0.000064023356,0.00010361588,0.000019010206,0.00023962764,0.00083534373,0.9002289,0.093646385,0.00020529231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030967956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000013004437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35153824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013687121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027884873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2565334147","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12093","title":"Immigration, Citizenship, and Consent: What is Wrong with Permanent Alienage?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Politics; Citation; Immigration; Law; Respondent; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.0521453708720397,"score_gpt":0.3249026986403992,"score_spread":0.27275732776835954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2565334147","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.115532055,0.00083284936,0.0003774328,0.7180833,0.000522998,0.00017951326,0.000031023716,0.00003586277,0.16440494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868466,0.0005443823,0.00013857867,0.01014575,0.0020045866,0.0000016025475,4.661055e-7,0.000014916616,0.0003030691],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976526,0.00027298168,0.0004596656,0.00018434366,0.00080147886,0.0006289322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971541,0.0011525427,0.00017141341,0.00015110374,0.00041803636,0.0009528055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073573936,0.00016403812,0.00031014535,0.00012355771,0.00033082842,0.00014842428,0.00021580915,0.00017282997,0.00012089596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045678258,0.000097514116,0.00012217107,0.00011669087,0.0019993423,0.000729902,0.0000404392,0.00031080694,0.000037859863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066004206,0.000048209073,0.0005312415,0.00003064001,0.000052744155,0.000054294534,0.0015038748,6.381431e-8,0.00008140251,0.99658483,0.00070344063,0.00034326277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072440784,0.00026338393,0.0010902858,0.00042700066,0.00006979672,0.00008704168,0.0010638068,5.1625534e-7,0.00020100738,0.991646,0.0042474777,0.00017929096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006087033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001613699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8713146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017432582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034728026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.736666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2577466458","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12111","title":"Public Reason and Reciprocity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Theory and Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Citation; Politics; Queen (butterfly); Economic Justice; Media studies; Sociology; Library science; Political science; Law; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.14683942276658368,"score_gpt":0.3790521099979908,"score_spread":0.23221268723140714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2577466458","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19922145,0.00012265054,0.00005252277,0.085785404,0.0003441569,0.000049170052,0.0000054511834,0.000012108935,0.7144071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99639344,0.000040833598,0.00022905716,0.0011756956,0.0020157103,5.116715e-7,6.835061e-8,0.000004987254,0.00013969844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985909,0.00019745379,0.00027029973,0.000096589654,0.0003677984,0.00047698006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981782,0.00027147032,0.00021014617,0.00020474086,0.00025697466,0.00087845884],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013362691,0.00007614795,0.00020119561,0.000053918055,0.00091494684,0.00024372104,0.000481765,0.00010241157,0.0000925647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008934948,0.000062169005,0.00009453393,0.000032799213,0.0017593404,0.00096408546,0.00007631955,0.00029224763,0.000020727395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015573607,0.000037207592,0.0026307665,0.000006999282,0.000010726238,0.000017949875,0.00015013441,8.887257e-9,0.00001942806,0.9959334,0.00009511538,0.0010826607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019478008,0.000085172964,0.017400175,0.000038690607,0.000012800875,0.000018446002,0.00009691259,0.0000010064323,0.000065638524,0.96260166,0.019409798,0.000074935444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013691283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000059448425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.797172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008355852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017633989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792894343","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12156","title":"The Taking of Territory and the Wrongs of Colonialism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Politics; Miller; Art history; Classics; Media studies; History; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04882915810236784,"score_gpt":0.3539527504512712,"score_spread":0.3051235923489034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792894343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17430528,0.0011778843,0.000108572014,0.392697,0.0017962481,0.00028260524,0.000031859046,0.000013459876,0.4295871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942028,0.00003903808,0.00007016874,0.0013579943,0.004291029,8.150383e-7,6.958064e-8,0.00000662853,0.000031450236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773777,0.00054337113,0.0006116835,0.00007555043,0.0006474803,0.00038415435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960265,0.002605516,0.00046646598,0.00015537605,0.0004942968,0.00025181394],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026683654,0.0000875495,0.00030086344,0.000052440893,0.00050682056,0.000031720723,0.00044998483,0.00013245056,0.000023212171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003433713,0.000046917758,0.0001798477,0.00011099372,0.011485045,0.00012619872,0.000074577925,0.00041458686,0.0000030504423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014788183,0.00003630955,0.00011731871,0.000018917728,0.000033532775,0.0000021291469,0.0022040943,7.364823e-8,0.000058817885,0.99710155,0.00016075173,0.00011861797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057209405,0.0002181693,0.0012121598,0.000063487045,0.00006152255,0.000009224414,0.00056786294,0.0000067324545,0.00024113996,0.98861945,0.008374863,0.000053269338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006386665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000039883373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81989753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053360764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027098414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99120516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2939881950","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12184","title":"Debate: In Defence of Fiscal Autonomy: A Reply to Risse and Meyer","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Autonomy; Politics; Political philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03834459464901945,"score_gpt":0.3369274046972666,"score_spread":0.29858281004824716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2939881950","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73101133,0.00012331929,0.000037688384,0.11595505,0.00036052355,0.00018804897,0.000015818936,0.000011066992,0.15229717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99147207,0.000009056926,0.00047631512,0.0073964517,0.0005498345,0.0000013160209,2.6656448e-7,0.000010083905,0.000084597494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977684,0.00024714283,0.00068198255,0.00018040677,0.0005500417,0.0005720534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782586,0.00089196954,0.00014893692,0.00017225996,0.00018469834,0.0007762685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012866149,0.00012561989,0.00046139475,0.00028956795,0.0000664142,0.00002796705,0.00030754166,0.00016575378,0.000097142096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020216957,0.00010981068,0.0001329847,0.0003257499,0.0005181822,0.00029083746,0.000079927966,0.00052977004,0.000036835256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007668671,0.000110077846,0.00769858,0.000037383477,0.00001896786,0.000026650845,0.002241697,0.0000062956574,0.00012417346,0.9894804,0.00008886979,0.0000902281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004357659,0.0003506201,0.024941748,0.00019223268,0.000032053602,0.000013653669,0.00038796535,0.000025936895,0.00016174278,0.9679439,0.005363508,0.00015088693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061918347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027560402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26046076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023172345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041518867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44779494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944706828","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12187","title":"Why Moral Reasoning Is Insufficient for Moral Progress","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Queen (butterfly); Sociology; Moral philosophy; Moral reasoning; Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Library science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07607932952111218,"score_gpt":0.36283140987503076,"score_spread":0.2867520803539186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944706828","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2679052,0.0005738139,0.0003778356,0.42281532,0.0032241915,0.0010219124,0.00013247567,0.00009627193,0.30385298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97764266,0.0000059405443,0.0012141423,0.016851071,0.0041255876,0.0000060600255,0.000001932286,0.000026527576,0.00012608983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99672335,0.0002105953,0.0006715055,0.0002412726,0.0010533959,0.0010998568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973023,0.00053448626,0.00026672427,0.00022551256,0.0007074845,0.00096351793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001261903,0.00020359021,0.00047825594,0.00018415574,0.0003285183,0.00011776169,0.00054056407,0.00029253648,0.00028613536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010305042,0.00017544144,0.00046327623,0.00025078838,0.00094731286,0.0004595068,0.00006822654,0.00067309843,0.000070835755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082193284,0.0002675337,0.0025281142,0.00007554594,0.000044222365,0.000013398446,0.0011584527,0.0000033321235,0.000009575593,0.9933985,0.0022880586,0.00013109144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082479883,0.0006874225,0.0007370502,0.00015759845,0.00006383624,0.000014992775,0.00043197357,0.0001313205,0.00014521668,0.96454364,0.032024194,0.0002379316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012296565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000348476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7097375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028767477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004650976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7154294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124854515","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9760.2012.00419.x","title":"Tax Competition and Global Background Justice*","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; German; Political science; Sociology; Humanities; Library science; Art history; Social science; History; Law; Art","score_opus":0.04558289261917025,"score_gpt":0.27654574561830386,"score_spread":0.2309628529991336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124854515","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7984958,0.0003945863,0.0018424594,0.020792797,0.0015632602,0.00008830539,0.000009624459,0.000031636504,0.17678152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858744,0.0000035579028,0.00024234325,0.0053102206,0.008533798,4.1194536e-7,0.0000022241493,0.000006586472,0.000026427786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991672,0.000010492225,0.0002795892,0.00006181372,0.00022146809,0.00025943216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935156,0.00003285176,0.00030060735,0.00006248239,0.00017995623,0.00007252091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022476188,0.000093572184,0.0001535505,0.00007701092,0.00007967581,0.000100928126,0.00008148572,0.00003990903,0.00015662595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010458814,0.00007796416,0.00006001457,0.00014833824,0.0000844622,0.0012169277,0.000048554473,0.00012322595,0.00015194621],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022128323,0.000083896804,0.011508992,0.000095136915,0.000008917136,0.0000055580754,0.0000033204312,9.4630235e-7,0.00006177168,0.98687714,0.0011428227,0.00018938594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010395041,0.000039373022,0.17944334,0.00011150215,0.00022785053,0.00011863259,0.00021784432,0.000159316,0.000020573661,0.7654003,0.052978907,0.00024285077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002044428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016500697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22147682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047952406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013331873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31792864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212765476","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12267","title":"Critical‐level Sufficientarianism*","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Japan Securities Scholarship Foundation","keywords":"Geology","score_opus":0.12056038532284971,"score_gpt":0.3883202821957024,"score_spread":0.26775989687285273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212765476","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061084023,0.00037890338,0.0018311494,0.3204008,0.002136092,0.000059631024,0.000059345435,0.00003690087,0.66898876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803746,0.000023782623,0.0020552818,0.011685697,0.005548222,8.4478677e-7,0.0000016778481,0.000017966071,0.00029194323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963644,0.0005602887,0.0007173265,0.00020642951,0.0011709227,0.0009806141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948899,0.001859352,0.000117112795,0.00023681283,0.001502744,0.0013940805],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012318841,0.00016239863,0.00039952682,0.00013086281,0.00047652668,0.00013321229,0.00041897394,0.00027970885,0.0008054551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013120726,0.0001530453,0.00038686354,0.00036028703,0.0015170734,0.00046068063,0.000085947744,0.0009139919,0.00014406074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001872446,0.000363138,0.00010053076,0.000031287374,0.000031051997,0.00042469325,0.00063962105,0.0000010822167,0.00010319084,0.9973318,0.00086839247,0.00008651073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031057713,0.00011782282,0.0005810295,0.00007815781,0.00007013927,0.00010196216,0.00076185877,0.0000032320706,0.0005442764,0.96767575,0.029579176,0.00017601323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014521887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002366215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9742662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027548135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014332696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99519217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234157206","doi":"10.1111/1467-9760.00091","title":"Pornographies","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Pornography; Virtue; Autonomy; Paternalism; Democracy; Law; Sociology; Censorship; Legislation; Politics; Morality; Political science","score_opus":0.02482496454297656,"score_gpt":0.3132600199931451,"score_spread":0.28843505545016856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234157206","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029662015,0.00017319407,0.00004005862,0.028208958,0.00021705593,0.000030344438,0.000009723122,0.000014534657,0.94164413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991784,0.0000664187,0.00040079816,0.0035878082,0.0028777816,3.4599026e-7,4.1188977e-7,0.0000045654842,0.0012778912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875003,0.00011104852,0.00029244297,0.000056747853,0.00042746007,0.00036225983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990511,0.00017853208,0.00007424965,0.000068867994,0.0001687498,0.00045850902],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027531263,0.000067736866,0.00016385585,0.00009716179,0.0002253392,0.00002641835,0.00019595536,0.000056432364,0.0018886417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001669486,0.00005753526,0.00017547641,0.00018313139,0.0015054384,0.00018930009,0.0000065066743,0.00018727008,0.00008236343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013960254,0.00005495686,0.00059790636,0.000002761219,0.000016688955,0.000027046146,0.00009404746,0.0000016206966,0.000002232825,0.99654603,0.0021309932,0.00051176915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012031909,0.00007071176,0.0009609791,0.00001689564,0.000020192405,0.000032681088,0.00015418456,2.447761e-7,0.000006367162,0.34456387,0.6539845,0.00006904056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024207908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000060007887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96212196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000061512015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006250842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4324082223","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12292","title":"Contractualist alternatives to the veil of ignorance","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Environmental ethics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.09037659743959713,"score_gpt":0.39520443712622433,"score_spread":0.3048278396866272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4324082223","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12966946,0.00016955014,0.00029338172,0.6121539,0.001505488,0.0002428809,0.00009848909,0.00004949147,0.25581735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901401,0.000029229477,0.00006380444,0.0055753016,0.004044413,0.0000022274348,5.8700357e-7,0.0000112470125,0.00013312466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737656,0.0003645255,0.0005799123,0.00011483355,0.00096475176,0.00059941626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967849,0.0017567307,0.00019525585,0.00018187141,0.00048193458,0.00059929746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018066277,0.000112196,0.00031987912,0.00016201133,0.00026821188,0.000038203354,0.00067141245,0.00010823118,0.00005374074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047347173,0.00007663496,0.00023157334,0.0005114265,0.0010340731,0.00020627436,0.000066329936,0.0004782825,0.00013630773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004197327,0.0000675283,0.00011502459,0.000018408475,0.00003585257,0.000025135549,0.0032464487,0.00001765528,0.0000777989,0.9945572,0.001654666,0.00014229992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024557192,0.00018176778,0.0027332138,0.00008138788,0.000026524216,0.000004879336,0.0011900557,0.000008686508,0.00031966355,0.9694621,0.025649535,0.00009660368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031851977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002469633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8604706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008957343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027744836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56682414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386738352","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12308","title":"Privacy, Publicity, and the Right to Be Forgotten","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Publicity; Right to be forgotten; Internet privacy; Right to privacy; The Right to Privacy; Political science; Computer science; Law; Data Protection Act 1998; Human rights","score_opus":0.050269069491993806,"score_gpt":0.33326786784243795,"score_spread":0.28299879835044417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386738352","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.106256075,0.00006635405,0.0002719391,0.8391932,0.00062665145,0.00029086467,0.000023310507,0.000053691627,0.053217888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99114406,0.000042532312,0.00015192591,0.0059612286,0.0025909839,0.000004680431,0.0000013400585,0.0000079809415,0.00009523701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982489,0.0002888007,0.00031854364,0.00011713586,0.00059838,0.0004282365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985779,0.0004497979,0.00010483436,0.0001991931,0.00018634932,0.00048192468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020512508,0.00008589376,0.00021222846,0.00019654469,0.00047166098,0.00017397793,0.000633696,0.00008257991,0.000056742687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045224084,0.000054565455,0.00011139528,0.00045179212,0.0004981499,0.00045467718,0.00039263695,0.00030240213,0.000048351547],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051951647,0.00002639013,0.00022919493,0.000008491591,0.000018184232,0.00001133875,0.0015895253,1.7346636e-7,0.000014244867,0.98405373,0.013792482,0.0002042955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057446427,0.00008271175,0.0026972988,0.000014351581,0.000021998838,0.00001591176,0.00034946698,0.000013035595,0.00004569208,0.89105624,0.105057254,0.00007157196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005164613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000057299483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.884888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008367538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012721382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54140717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387004773","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12311","title":"Debate: Political Authority, Functionalism, and the Problem of Annexation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law and economics; Jurisdiction; Law; Annexation; State (computer science); Political science; Democracy; Functionalism (philosophy of mind); Order (exchange); Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.06938441978727689,"score_gpt":0.3530540322368549,"score_spread":0.283669612449578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387004773","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037527792,0.00020646324,0.00032678846,0.6324007,0.0007621441,0.0003145799,0.000052961164,0.00007155381,0.32833704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943816,0.000031950985,0.00025192092,0.0022166104,0.0029588367,0.0000033537665,0.0000022721997,0.0000122316505,0.00014123587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99675375,0.00066460145,0.00070651947,0.00013943766,0.0010142984,0.0007214156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962648,0.0021532571,0.00021504283,0.00012848394,0.0005642567,0.0006741242],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031543155,0.00013058007,0.0003775129,0.00019985126,0.0003833888,0.000052979343,0.00029735753,0.0002231234,0.000048455273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021760517,0.00008823337,0.00022971089,0.00045340476,0.0031586222,0.00029710107,0.000091391594,0.0006106062,0.000027480592],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011156505,0.000066448796,0.00024729595,0.000056859015,0.000043819637,0.000012316594,0.00078424,0.0000025206964,0.000010748341,0.9979762,0.00059147814,0.00009653447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008134905,0.00013239273,0.002904031,0.000060930033,0.00007840738,0.000025999474,0.0006329063,0.000040804054,0.000034802848,0.9907047,0.004476506,0.0000950201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044720288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000761089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9568538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001136694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036464477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387079017","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12310","title":"The Epistemic Dimensions of Civil Disobedience","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil disobedience; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06907300815863618,"score_gpt":0.35953816627926544,"score_spread":0.29046515812062923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387079017","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066874914,0.0005462339,0.00009443312,0.54295075,0.0025169186,0.00022568263,0.00004856745,0.00008682116,0.38665566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968782,0.00025493093,0.000030443765,0.00083094864,0.0017796258,0.0000016142034,4.642575e-7,0.000010406616,0.00021334158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971251,0.00036232013,0.0006762705,0.000111686815,0.0009796718,0.0007449482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952696,0.003245554,0.00023657785,0.00021353381,0.00042456438,0.00061015744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021712857,0.00010832642,0.00027671596,0.00012860245,0.00066662167,0.00003399363,0.0006108401,0.00014021908,0.000027648537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005292436,0.000063535546,0.00028064917,0.0005548147,0.0023652723,0.00020112631,0.00009911599,0.00056564924,0.00008137733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019371806,0.00004722355,0.00024177477,0.000018894429,0.000022111948,0.000018720035,0.00068555947,0.0000034647726,0.00008518993,0.9976092,0.001176805,0.000071701346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015569523,0.000118312295,0.0012313805,0.000076760305,0.00003003783,0.000007844919,0.00066714716,0.000013770112,0.000074970914,0.9859676,0.011575669,0.00008086105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012882132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000048742215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9300033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010683596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040535498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8714945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387671359","doi":"10.1111/jopp.12313","title":"The challenge of policing minorities in a liberal society","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Normative; Politics; Political science; Neglect; Subject (documents); Law; Undue influence; Perception; Criminology; Sociology; Law and economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.08309903948348975,"score_gpt":0.36300244201866533,"score_spread":0.2799034025351756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387671359","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15249962,0.0004614261,0.000008871382,0.47731403,0.00089783844,0.00015796664,0.000021035916,0.000044325952,0.36859488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99539554,0.000316542,0.000052022693,0.0011026876,0.0029285906,0.0000019131824,3.66551e-7,0.000011489649,0.00019083303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729943,0.00030470148,0.0006976444,0.00010413324,0.0007765329,0.00081753015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970682,0.0020095964,0.0001754023,0.00014830151,0.00024012342,0.00035837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021919953,0.00011438038,0.0003199087,0.00013757365,0.00033801864,0.000037140017,0.00045233103,0.00019114016,0.0000148803565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001449342,0.00008306811,0.00036959362,0.00047140947,0.0014864779,0.00022694204,0.0000766427,0.0007114478,0.000015729773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020877662,0.000062501145,0.00051936804,0.000043988322,0.00002705747,0.000015273446,0.0052823396,0.000003281928,0.000012651517,0.9931509,0.0007364659,0.00012530563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028982307,0.00012543568,0.0028832292,0.000107411026,0.000015351276,0.0000028251352,0.0019717824,0.000022420565,0.000033539978,0.9923849,0.0020764747,0.00008676866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065512635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000094054856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8428959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017047435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037412185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.547699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}