{"meta":{"query_hash":"dd274eda7d81","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Political Power"},"cohort_total":10,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":10,"exported":10,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/dd274eda7d81","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Political+Power"},"results":[{"id":"W2024440997","doi":"10.1080/2158379x.2015.1010800","title":"On the source, site and modes of domination","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Power","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Institutionalisation; Power (physics); Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.042692894252080685,"score_gpt":0.35251220455395404,"score_spread":0.3098193103018734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024440997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25723413,0.0056542065,0.051980842,0.015678452,0.00010615813,0.00010102357,0.00012632005,0.00011638748,0.66900253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929584,0.0008734196,0.0013768445,0.00017320603,0.000051582327,0.00003318228,0.000018055402,0.000036751862,0.0044785575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929134,0.0039768377,0.00021118349,0.0005807871,0.0015202804,0.0007975867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984914,0.010188251,0.0014173504,0.0017535958,0.001241592,0.00048518702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009367008,0.00030367612,0.00056105695,0.004680752,0.0048597204,0.012004884,0.0011202797,0.0014515395,0.0061190394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0153764775,0.00034485335,0.00036396968,0.0037411437,0.042218465,0.013661095,0.0073609636,0.0025218525,0.0005911145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018047653,0.000009123168,0.0033425642,0.000043785567,0.000007122321,0.000090488,0.028059067,0.0001725475,0.00033666703,0.9552838,0.00042162498,0.012215107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019960817,0.000037276714,0.01322163,0.00044806232,0.000019871737,0.00036794532,0.04743496,0.0011656052,0.0010192295,0.87974906,0.056474254,0.00004224847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029093095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035359669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012004884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053852955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032421858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049538016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030192577","doi":"10.1080/2158379x.2012.735117","title":"Powers of action: locating agency in a post-apartheid redress campaign","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Power","topic":"South African History and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Grassroots; Agency (philosophy); Governmentality; Scholarship; Power (physics); Sociology; Action (physics); Perspective (graphical); Political science; Public administration; Law; Social science; Politics","score_opus":0.0372224259764821,"score_gpt":0.33707462133318816,"score_spread":0.29985219535670604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030192577","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5435208,0.0018247833,0.0061452026,0.013717452,0.0002378337,0.00006787591,0.000023076529,0.000042507225,0.43442047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936516,0.0002226974,0.00030854877,0.00018279951,0.000024214956,0.00002093219,0.0000048643806,0.000012305317,0.0055719977],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99485224,0.0033677486,0.00008886062,0.0002896252,0.00046746145,0.0009340923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99438125,0.0040097605,0.00056546414,0.0002852692,0.00022214455,0.0005361576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042395075,0.0003061307,0.00027980306,0.0033143281,0.015201987,0.010609134,0.00095521077,0.0026270684,0.004876665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008647978,0.00036608404,0.00024758553,0.0021346584,0.037761554,0.009264324,0.010335988,0.0034498726,0.00041791354],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035442892,0.000028049135,0.0017816081,0.000041170504,0.000005117601,0.000988338,0.6952426,0.000101155245,0.00043622518,0.28577507,0.0010554319,0.014509762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013400734,0.00005485431,0.005109706,0.00028313242,0.000013421415,0.0004852964,0.7704924,0.0003328309,0.00075632887,0.051537853,0.17089298,0.000027833512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056486917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010245942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015201987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004580595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003527697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033234775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063489293","doi":"10.1080/2158379x.2012.698906","title":"How can we be sure?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Power","topic":"Racial and Ethnic Identity Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Political science; Political economy; Economics","score_opus":0.07032787464225021,"score_gpt":0.4003908396790662,"score_spread":0.330062965036816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063489293","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00068485877,0.01094228,0.001058878,0.97233474,0.007989988,0.000007941266,0.00004800724,0.00003158852,0.0069016474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10834083,0.027533673,0.0049522636,0.8190648,0.016754434,0.0002602349,0.00017272343,0.00023909438,0.022681808],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97434795,0.014803942,0.0012923154,0.001953323,0.0054482403,0.0021542732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87194544,0.070108786,0.0051925285,0.007811492,0.028510686,0.01643104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.053145915,0.0013453357,0.0029839976,0.0038460754,0.02009546,0.023021886,0.0034109259,0.019096041,0.030424753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20506218,0.001019649,0.0012895843,0.0027313174,0.056042623,0.07232771,0.014241973,0.046476413,0.013184197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010221235,0.00017923863,0.0035211728,0.0005694693,0.00015811721,0.00018321094,0.009575037,0.0001359693,0.00013315515,0.2805437,0.61313534,0.091763444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003802265,0.00003384118,0.0012780234,0.0015771763,0.00007604577,0.00014811078,0.024680162,0.00012914202,0.00015545104,0.6421457,0.3296347,0.000103629085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00953955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010480232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053145915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052474793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017739939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28106582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301730607","doi":"10.1080/2158379x.2016.1149310","title":"Corporate responsibility or corporate power? CSR and the shaping of the definitions and solutions to our public problems","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Power","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate social responsibility; Power (physics); Order (exchange); Field (mathematics); Distribution (mathematics); Social responsibility; Representation (politics); Law and economics; Work (physics); Public relations; Business; Sociology; Political science; Law; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.5646826608814108,"score_gpt":0.420056637376983,"score_spread":0.14462602350442783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301730607","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051901717,0.02538915,0.039956383,0.49595794,0.0017980913,0.000051446095,0.000058948823,0.000054003038,0.3848323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9654588,0.0069988267,0.0031179911,0.011332068,0.0009342615,0.00004637625,0.0000222528,0.00004698642,0.0120423315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889737,0.0068522426,0.00019728951,0.000889346,0.001894264,0.0011932694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99076277,0.0052064084,0.0012636277,0.000774852,0.0011437386,0.0008485857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010218714,0.00044207624,0.00066857267,0.0015570935,0.0032164217,0.009929262,0.0011258305,0.0052958755,0.005243958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011169928,0.00016932144,0.00048358532,0.0014775413,0.04891052,0.014903108,0.004285147,0.0052366923,0.0007826952],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005495009,0.00001360277,0.00025892677,0.000037073474,0.0000046917557,0.000028920827,0.0022982045,0.00018438637,0.00006894446,0.98962796,0.0019532053,0.005518577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005685003,0.000015855238,0.0003373416,0.00024641163,0.0000041886697,0.000047512825,0.005497028,0.0003812842,0.00017563318,0.92486197,0.068415575,0.000011541191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028749711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020245556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010218714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042387424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055047614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05404234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588730977","doi":"10.1080/2158379x.2017.1287471","title":"<i>Pouvoir constituant</i>betrayed: a model of abjection in power relations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Power","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Proletariat; Power (physics); Biopower; Exceptionalism; Politics; Epistemology; Sociology; Limit (mathematics); Reflexivity; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Social science; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.03903970062522288,"score_gpt":0.3601829460616507,"score_spread":0.3211432454364278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588730977","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.156425,0.0008942499,0.07317976,0.011442087,0.00021570527,0.00006485182,0.000042169424,0.00012992915,0.7576063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875731,0.00015442913,0.003004136,0.00025019105,0.000046298614,0.000042401036,0.000011518088,0.00003177945,0.008886169],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966061,0.0022602705,0.000069073765,0.0003632518,0.00041455094,0.00028677995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982317,0.0008463354,0.000200299,0.0003406239,0.0002160381,0.00016511632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035470915,0.0003359187,0.00037830992,0.0014340442,0.008522441,0.01119112,0.0011046433,0.0020160405,0.0042972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004275315,0.0002764403,0.00046243428,0.0012089129,0.046299353,0.011172635,0.0058576637,0.0032849794,0.0006496004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049477644,0.00000399879,0.00009684726,0.000003626724,8.50687e-7,0.000045335502,0.01233888,0.000057561956,0.000059526563,0.98641646,0.00016883457,0.0008031038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001118466,0.000027040578,0.00042010215,0.000060299935,0.000006371187,0.00019534738,0.012965164,0.0020236964,0.00023796152,0.94982636,0.03420957,0.000016946464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041455566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020279132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01119112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039028449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018272593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028317213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762259134","doi":"10.1080/2158379x.2017.1382178","title":"Transition impossible? Ukraine between violence and power","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Power","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Transition (genetics); Power (physics); Political science; Political economy; Economic system; Sociology; Economics; Physics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.02536020247175562,"score_gpt":0.35138024265387924,"score_spread":0.3260200401821236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762259134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9838134,0.0009006123,0.00026639696,0.0013629746,0.000019738547,0.0000035131015,0.000023372337,0.0000026713858,0.013607382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99956733,0.00013456779,0.000021803786,0.00006126095,0.0000026220082,0.0000012935544,0.000005513081,6.197581e-7,0.00020505737],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988217,0.00050133,0.000074233896,0.00013345252,0.00015882876,0.00031053275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992955,0.0002183057,0.0002547301,0.000039262606,0.00005380357,0.00013838006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008749169,0.00008955747,0.00030903672,0.00056582823,0.0024348986,0.0032732172,0.0002455003,0.00028807452,0.0014841317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001970977,0.000110046436,0.00014205479,0.0009121556,0.0038902948,0.0020252457,0.0039875275,0.0009222641,0.000097312484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018733903,0.00012759371,0.361183,0.00025348942,0.00009839801,0.003207508,0.32743645,0.00073349726,0.0012618364,0.23004414,0.0023990385,0.07306768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017095694,0.00011776291,0.44562194,0.00049477303,0.00004135389,0.0019451434,0.46391615,0.0006186964,0.00068253116,0.030404145,0.056104187,0.000036199624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011546563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012929129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011546563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021744343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021085467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022958696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205676717","doi":"10.1080/2158379x.2021.1991697","title":"Power in modernity: a discussion among Mark Haugaard, Clarissa Hayward, and Jonathan G. Heaney of<i>Power in Modernity: agency relations and the creative destruction of the King’s two bodies</i>, by Isaac Ariail Reed, with a reply by Isaac Reed","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Power","topic":"Theatre and Performance Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; University of Galway; Queen's University Belfast; National University of Ireland; University of Cambridge; Washington University in St. Louis","keywords":"Modernity; Agency (philosophy); Power (physics); Politics; Sociology; Aesthetics; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.009397576867257396,"score_gpt":0.226755260063042,"score_spread":0.2173576831957846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205676717","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047978754,0.03373746,0.0004010182,0.9376739,0.0045461515,0.0000067838105,0.000008496238,0.000010477334,0.018817823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4596694,0.05444828,0.0014723593,0.4053494,0.023603097,0.000086170745,0.000025195824,0.00016454876,0.055181634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954963,0.0027811355,0.00008166142,0.0004230166,0.0007380855,0.00047981675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917495,0.006527543,0.00031700282,0.00018383373,0.0005515925,0.00067052117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061385804,0.0007287248,0.0007486167,0.0013635904,0.017219184,0.01070819,0.002305089,0.013329305,0.0040465514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007767633,0.0004970751,0.0004835763,0.0019303793,0.03906584,0.019620413,0.00539806,0.016292235,0.0006079157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003337667,0.000023010065,0.000274552,0.00015732115,0.000010449962,0.0005406376,0.13945986,0.00008986142,0.00012950366,0.52322924,0.32319006,0.012862104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014886968,0.000029022227,0.0005024292,0.00042281856,0.000005532654,0.00043704748,0.06367457,0.00010819777,0.00016247756,0.059968032,0.8746413,0.000033722958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020451596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033899296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020451596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075544133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004579199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05481136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396916228","doi":"10.1080/2158379x.2024.2349300","title":"Media and power in times of hegemonic crisis: exploring contentious climate politics on Twitter","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Power","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegemony; Politics; Power (physics); Political economy; Political science; Contentious politics; Social media; Media studies; Sociology; Social movement; Law","score_opus":0.0601676842095736,"score_gpt":0.3523428184620511,"score_spread":0.29217513425247754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396916228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9701828,0.00033597156,0.0010050051,0.00258222,0.000036526715,0.000032522283,0.0003300696,0.000014018187,0.02548083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99792385,0.00019877523,0.00024515614,0.00017466416,0.00004489509,0.00003651515,0.00010995747,0.000022620616,0.0012436089],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989574,0.0005052304,0.00003475805,0.00009811353,0.00016832832,0.00023607495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951019,0.0036096112,0.0006181966,0.00017030947,0.00026318844,0.0002367446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012254472,0.00023716583,0.00027268654,0.0028316434,0.0028592707,0.0067666257,0.00051315513,0.0009788717,0.0054786876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064328033,0.00021792622,0.00018097235,0.0039079385,0.0040027183,0.008911982,0.00394808,0.0010916606,0.00080090517],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000310541,0.0000987345,0.15511689,0.0003153943,0.000051057155,0.0013652382,0.7629699,0.0004474397,0.0032056964,0.028771086,0.0047436077,0.042604398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011865119,0.000049923772,0.17162648,0.00019490551,0.000022322822,0.00022169277,0.7877984,0.0013988209,0.0005674977,0.008952842,0.029119719,0.000035543373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008068954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016471427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008068954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018525319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066285406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018328011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400229430","doi":"10.1080/2158379x.2024.2370813","title":"Negotiating censorial power and its legitimacy: a case study of the second face of state censorship","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Power","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Censorship; Negotiation; State (computer science); Face (sociological concept); Power (physics); Political science; Law and economics; Political economy; Face-to-face; Sociology; Law; Politics; Epistemology; Social science; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.019344528723668472,"score_gpt":0.32053446679035036,"score_spread":0.3011899380666819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400229430","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9593466,0.00022647853,0.0033495787,0.0027504668,0.000034900775,0.000063942694,0.000023000743,0.000015707898,0.034189396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972451,0.00009312931,0.000490288,0.00009567189,0.0000132016685,0.000022361779,0.000007753374,0.0000072676344,0.0020253623],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99446183,0.0040425663,0.00010880118,0.00032194387,0.0004273848,0.0006374441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99285406,0.004970959,0.0007716136,0.0006931125,0.00023020129,0.00048012284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005459948,0.000376913,0.000509149,0.0013971445,0.01728546,0.0059273704,0.0013959163,0.0040160837,0.0037835988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008618791,0.0002960717,0.00040106982,0.0014966085,0.017318483,0.00563093,0.0057438025,0.0045303255,0.00026120825],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006988713,0.00017859311,0.009250421,0.00007319248,0.000020274252,0.008920383,0.8581243,0.00046076372,0.0014205691,0.10968906,0.0011941886,0.0105984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004068439,0.00015098508,0.010110814,0.00022002417,0.00003200583,0.0028304236,0.88504976,0.0035613154,0.0020728372,0.028663483,0.06720193,0.00006569514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009127159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01669256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01728546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043044286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026398255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031230927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417417772","doi":"10.1080/2158379x.2025.2605049","title":"Charismatic figures or totalitarian leaders? A phenomenographic analysis of eliteness in Iranian Kurdistan","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Political Power","topic":"Turkey's Politics and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Charisma; Phenomenography; Charismatic authority; Diplomacy","score_opus":0.028191901543051776,"score_gpt":0.3737008880722845,"score_spread":0.34550898652923273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417417772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958134,0.0002817941,0.00032035957,0.0007081845,0.000022361002,0.00003018832,0.000026893098,0.000002365145,0.0027944483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988431,0.00023360402,0.00015098856,0.00015837583,0.0000077616,0.000026100892,0.000017216003,0.000003554004,0.0005593367],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985024,0.00100938,0.00004391619,0.000086653636,0.00013406671,0.00022368129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987816,0.0007151461,0.00018711585,0.000048873804,0.000120377146,0.00014682648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00260111,0.00033206187,0.00033768764,0.0010740714,0.0050876196,0.0030980266,0.00063371914,0.00057540945,0.0014540144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003211054,0.00023039863,0.00015181341,0.0010378768,0.005969817,0.0024680826,0.001945679,0.0011805064,0.00013695587],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019204836,0.000020119298,0.005623966,0.00005140093,0.0000021614405,0.00035222014,0.98949206,0.000014883731,0.0003121901,0.0012664576,0.0003559598,0.002489386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010605864,0.0000112667,0.0024020094,0.000021506517,0.0000010022947,0.00007991997,0.99528825,0.000015193382,0.000037830734,0.00012366092,0.0020152777,0.0000030340693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004921324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01106093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050876196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001925402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019554389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013969898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}