{"meta":{"query_hash":"4ea73da61017","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Population Economics"},"cohort_total":48,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":48,"exported":48,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4ea73da61017","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Population+Economics"},"results":[{"id":"W1676984392","doi":"10.1007/s00148-015-0557-9","title":"Inter-generational effects of disability benefits: evidence from Canadian social assistance programs","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Anxiety; Cognition; Social policy; Payment; Developmental psychology; Cognitive skill; Economics; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.053349180212984015,"score_gpt":0.2962671969217656,"score_spread":0.2429180167087816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1676984392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97104394,0.012361318,0.00014718137,0.0028602006,0.00006344522,0.00010110824,0.0037738073,0.000008451637,0.009640634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991622,0.0047890167,0.00013036188,0.0003183629,0.000022628885,0.000032770735,0.0010493008,0.0000051617817,0.002030491],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99429744,0.0014187889,0.0002268772,0.0005174527,0.0011967322,0.002342822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854661,0.0053072744,0.0031344502,0.00085869356,0.003155884,0.002077576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048440304,0.0005808693,0.00084347185,0.003285646,0.004398939,0.0023574121,0.0026206644,0.0014526214,0.0076011377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015827911,0.0004198576,0.0013708514,0.006805491,0.0023618268,0.00089491997,0.0030532689,0.0016376823,0.00027796841],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081283005,0.00048797854,0.9648613,0.00018535466,0.0008372616,0.00031961367,0.0040294267,0.00045488292,0.00011515663,0.0016665987,0.0019213832,0.024308305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060464707,0.00009584389,0.99152434,0.00018075889,0.0005758745,0.000049248767,0.0047032987,0.00018546717,0.0000626997,0.00025481705,0.0022840414,0.000023144417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9831561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9899222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021065904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021065904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026147451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15284455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968294676","doi":"10.1007/s00148-005-0006-2","title":"Post-migration investments in education and job search: a family perspective","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Social policy; Perspective (graphical); Immigration; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Principal (computer security); Economics; Political science; Market economy","score_opus":0.02381379524234424,"score_gpt":0.322729116210697,"score_spread":0.29891532096835277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968294676","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97378415,0.0033109458,0.0008466108,0.006720904,0.00003195508,0.0000067215565,0.00023953954,0.000004555673,0.015054605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99711645,0.0008216961,0.00008068912,0.00010708182,0.000026129503,0.0000027453154,0.000030267685,0.0000013248766,0.0018136743],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997861,0.000090485475,0.000005354855,0.000020208588,0.000014261132,0.000083595085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99737465,0.0014065919,0.00033717568,0.00008662431,0.00012364275,0.0006713377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075194635,0.00021561673,0.0002639571,0.0008303512,0.0009065826,0.001565349,0.00045697755,0.0013048303,0.0101482915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002159815,0.00018801136,0.00039141218,0.0008911496,0.0010176683,0.0015649422,0.0006516268,0.0008212282,0.00027653098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085252273,0.0015493198,0.77886033,0.00011002989,0.00039452556,0.0027464016,0.007574179,0.008122612,0.0012136167,0.13610086,0.0026472483,0.059828296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043803862,0.00056329067,0.9270874,0.00014625772,0.00020834968,0.001076862,0.017879322,0.0058427993,0.00034235607,0.04016559,0.006608253,0.000035748806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011711457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017534314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011711457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010028061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006674382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033949375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977878233","doi":"10.1007/pl00003837","title":"Wages, employment and economic shocks: Evidence from Indonesia","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Economics; Social policy; Panel data; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Geography; Market economy","score_opus":0.03033015003631154,"score_gpt":0.21845736398992777,"score_spread":0.18812721395361623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977878233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997477,0.00020623839,0.0000548019,0.00012957866,0.0000034190941,0.0000051061775,0.00032388844,0.0000014353107,0.0017984615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984648,0.00045965367,0.000054346856,0.000052076644,0.000008357944,0.000005224844,0.00046341986,0.0000015947066,0.0004904609],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99979836,0.000046669342,0.000025005324,0.000030341282,0.000037281996,0.000062354666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978715,0.0010381693,0.00061136065,0.000094588526,0.00017225792,0.00021211985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005376573,0.00025171158,0.00041608594,0.00082116557,0.0006153821,0.00076940365,0.00046100936,0.00044566617,0.0029616922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015887809,0.00019981827,0.00023961716,0.0023089852,0.0007196489,0.00061155064,0.0009817465,0.00081881444,0.00052501675],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00070132833,0.00069786125,0.9752357,0.0001323317,0.00015376003,0.0013797685,0.0021986233,0.0006025518,0.0006070035,0.00051110284,0.00092815043,0.01685174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025925026,0.00009438904,0.9932064,0.000038974347,0.00010600965,0.00026444002,0.004401687,0.00039004517,0.00025491702,0.00023856427,0.0009680313,0.000010622648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03174687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0427092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03174687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005350895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053829595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06312418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988091025","doi":"10.1007/s001480100106","title":"Child care workers' wages: New evidence on returns to education, experience, job tenure and auspice","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Stylized fact; Wage; Labour economics; Economics; Child care; Social policy; Demographic economics; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.03485260881919084,"score_gpt":0.30461525540584855,"score_spread":0.2697626465866577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988091025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98531115,0.008165395,0.00017779916,0.0010082378,0.000039443894,0.000008768716,0.00088489935,0.0000029763858,0.004401418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959847,0.0021601822,0.00009181304,0.00023391056,0.00008059315,0.000007995099,0.0006550971,0.0000049427044,0.00078072975],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776936,0.0008718635,0.00017067416,0.00031694767,0.00044947403,0.00042169009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9081114,0.070483044,0.012287694,0.0034399827,0.0028091464,0.0028687154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069911256,0.00038326054,0.0010111049,0.002005008,0.00091734447,0.001762633,0.0022532789,0.0018689969,0.009128786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03189426,0.0004063172,0.00095198175,0.0035850857,0.0023613968,0.0017642429,0.0019596983,0.0018272976,0.0007685411],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001101985,0.00024525227,0.98194754,0.00012588101,0.00037766623,0.0001717088,0.000883917,0.0001803286,0.00011308494,0.0006541058,0.0005072826,0.013691217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039466842,0.000112689275,0.99712723,0.00007704649,0.00026053784,0.00005866203,0.0010792115,0.000075911346,0.00006301541,0.00034422704,0.00075232907,0.000009735285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042141426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0730942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042141426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009030328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010121264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08379227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990655186","doi":"10.1007/s00148-013-0483-7","title":"Testing the relationship between income inequality and life expectancy: a simple correction for the aggregation effect when using aggregated data","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Global Health Care Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Alberta Innovates - Health Solutions","keywords":"Life expectancy; Economics; Economic inequality; Inequality; Income distribution; Income inequality metrics; Hazard; Econometrics; Population; Demographic economics; Mathematics; Demography; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.3014405690339513,"score_gpt":0.4578998834144262,"score_spread":0.15645931438047495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990655186","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93195343,0.00040602993,0.05912841,0.0009303455,0.0003933482,0.00025928757,0.0032317608,0.0003227538,0.0033746385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98052603,0.00005611377,0.015868628,0.0001557052,0.00007332085,0.00028421092,0.0016320744,0.000097613505,0.0013063694],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9596958,0.028815668,0.002359127,0.0049777343,0.0028219037,0.0013297582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8185796,0.1440252,0.009570297,0.02234049,0.0043855286,0.0010989342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0322227,0.0011413231,0.0013708391,0.0013387862,0.0016348051,0.0016933711,0.0025976445,0.0018001727,0.005517842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1300852,0.00067474425,0.003566318,0.0036709446,0.001415413,0.0025258102,0.0024713709,0.0024419017,0.0006957663],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010018677,0.00037372514,0.9442673,0.00024333967,0.007355812,0.00048583696,0.0011215507,0.008065523,0.0014399391,0.0037247585,0.0027025752,0.029217731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031389677,0.00197795,0.9106051,0.00012926133,0.003817214,0.00059526856,0.001420063,0.062398665,0.0036595433,0.008536498,0.006441417,0.00010517123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02015288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016300682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0322227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006331245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018032342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.170412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005524516","doi":"10.1007/s001480100099","title":"Employment and child-care choices of single-parent families in Canada and the United States","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child care; Subsidy; Social policy; Demographic economics; Single mothers; Economics; Wage; Labour economics; Psychology; Medicine; Nursing; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.023776481941515683,"score_gpt":0.2369391402207217,"score_spread":0.21316265827920602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005524516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977538,0.00044645628,0.000016270275,0.00044292997,0.000009112473,0.000006076882,0.00054197153,0.0000011882678,0.0007821534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998307,0.00039730183,0.00003178862,0.000106333784,0.000003157734,0.0000052364385,0.00030408346,0.0000018512161,0.00084316015],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990683,0.00012977795,0.000034275567,0.00007047304,0.00015439406,0.0005427937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976781,0.00024550306,0.0003668189,0.00003464812,0.0005793651,0.0010957186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007500941,0.00021479165,0.0005676105,0.0011865993,0.005771077,0.0020922837,0.0012973518,0.0008954479,0.0029349923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023341898,0.00030345615,0.0006828861,0.003187731,0.0012640818,0.0005814435,0.0012118806,0.0012081427,0.00020488437],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021001665,0.00018213737,0.982852,0.000020318652,0.000070685164,0.00026622802,0.007316567,0.0003470295,0.000117286494,0.000637499,0.0013749179,0.0066053295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019111905,0.000044954184,0.9662772,0.00006742755,0.000031099116,0.00009785999,0.031266604,0.00046545843,0.00006672326,0.00014362774,0.0014996236,0.000020288155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99736553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02047379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02047379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023401497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14854848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005546350","doi":"10.1007/s00148-006-0120-9","title":"Intergenerational education mobility of black and white South Africans","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"HEC Montréal; Rhodes University","keywords":"Educational attainment; Social mobility; Demographic economics; White (mutation); Social policy; Geography; Economics; Demography; Sociology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.03959985235301162,"score_gpt":0.33711300266032945,"score_spread":0.29751315030731784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005546350","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99938524,0.00004999926,0.000010727037,0.000061057515,0.0000013732177,0.0000015311273,0.00007332123,3.4257314e-7,0.00041643882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989644,0.00008473928,0.000016253502,0.000014247565,0.0000014594402,0.0000029110258,0.0000670435,6.410288e-7,0.00084832107],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998547,0.000032379085,0.000006661149,0.00002259211,0.00001214306,0.00007150737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955004,0.00010969713,0.00014524444,0.000027620534,0.000052398616,0.000114886854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000376952,0.00017023123,0.00018621814,0.0009419992,0.0013375978,0.0008820069,0.0003249051,0.000384284,0.0054458724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016783801,0.00013142345,0.00024134576,0.001086384,0.0003562944,0.0010135532,0.0011686116,0.00045091266,0.00049720943],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004329656,0.00023995929,0.9461752,0.000027687936,0.0000551016,0.00036699645,0.03558625,0.00017975498,0.0010398971,0.0016930657,0.0004902572,0.013712695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075703574,0.0000818271,0.96360296,0.000025594465,0.000026087973,0.00012965046,0.03433986,0.0002738444,0.00015593693,0.0005397636,0.0008067847,0.000010111195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06899656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.113372795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06899656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005760245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004173184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13718987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019637004","doi":"10.1007/s00148-009-0279-y","title":"Structural instability and alternative development scenarios","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Economic Growth and Productivity","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Plague (disease); Population growth; Development economics; Economics; Emigration; Population; Productivity; Social policy; Economic geography; Geography; History; Economic growth; Demography; Sociology; Ancient history; Market economy","score_opus":0.036027195040512446,"score_gpt":0.22969590763560058,"score_spread":0.19366871259508814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019637004","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8404847,0.00062439824,0.043135155,0.008364963,0.00013781992,0.00012933533,0.00079437136,0.00012603408,0.106203064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99630105,0.00019649495,0.0012052557,0.00007356041,0.00002878679,0.000028462784,0.00007412512,0.000009749397,0.0020824831],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.999537,0.00024083337,0.000016320724,0.000040571933,0.00003934756,0.0001260203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974625,0.0013392321,0.00036156454,0.0002122585,0.0002749788,0.0003493772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015015147,0.0004580716,0.0005771707,0.001449506,0.001027265,0.0027735862,0.0009831289,0.0027133839,0.008939576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007573821,0.00029310837,0.0007696452,0.0012274156,0.0015264526,0.002401756,0.0013156733,0.0011940632,0.00045905996],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044592476,0.00015788696,0.0033070561,0.000066329936,0.000060993338,0.00069399807,0.00035193985,0.18670906,0.00044149606,0.7932888,0.0042795916,0.010196924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020385225,0.000097021584,0.002156794,0.000024700881,0.000045976445,0.00017544528,0.0006027488,0.3833039,0.00013437714,0.6101879,0.0030318697,0.000035333687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036564018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039789653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008939576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013958844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005439034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029905796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020474949","doi":"10.1007/s00148-012-0426-8","title":"Working parents and total factor productivity growth","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Total factor productivity; Economics; Workforce; Current Population Survey; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Social policy; Growth accounting; Population; Economic growth; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.04137518826517744,"score_gpt":0.27952584824367777,"score_spread":0.23815065997850032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020474949","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935638,0.0013253592,0.0002869526,0.0008991834,0.00003941155,0.0000039368556,0.0003340972,0.0000062089193,0.0035411585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980558,0.0005142239,0.00006419654,0.00003353992,0.00003399417,0.0000035245216,0.00013662661,0.0000024538108,0.00115559],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997702,0.00009550376,0.000015023441,0.000028437087,0.00002793359,0.000062949686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942319,0.0032554786,0.0009223781,0.00023015478,0.00033090622,0.0010292432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009372302,0.00020760063,0.00024849887,0.0007940238,0.00045169046,0.00094111235,0.00027451958,0.00057222444,0.0072741252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059733978,0.0001635779,0.0003996876,0.001067472,0.0005004969,0.000814004,0.00050824054,0.00085080473,0.00045971],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002241838,0.00012735474,0.9801753,0.000017332231,0.000059648995,0.00043345254,0.0008544068,0.0004052331,0.00012936362,0.0024275908,0.00062626327,0.014519881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024316187,0.00014154136,0.987568,0.00004684717,0.00010044714,0.0004845104,0.003694536,0.0010935148,0.00016513196,0.004577178,0.0020918858,0.000012118336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010001788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072079175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010001788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031705323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006172007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024334371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036076192","doi":"10.1007/s00148-014-0528-6","title":"Compensating for unequal parental investments in schooling","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Consumption (sociology); Demographic economics; Redistribution (election); Investment (military); Multiplicative function; Econometrics; Survey data collection; Labour economics; China; Statistics; Geography; Mathematics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03934528047955961,"score_gpt":0.30902254478741487,"score_spread":0.26967726430785527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036076192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9775325,0.00034411138,0.0055414997,0.0021375748,0.00005932042,0.000029714214,0.00026188378,0.000050157494,0.0140433125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997572,0.000054628705,0.00035707012,0.000069554255,0.0000142422305,0.0000055930295,0.00003597775,0.0000044135695,0.0018865669],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904305,0.00023638832,0.000047956088,0.00012161986,0.000086373584,0.00046456838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945312,0.0023100208,0.0011728944,0.0009145611,0.00036335367,0.0007079319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020332981,0.00031884896,0.00059998885,0.0004708197,0.0005484672,0.0012152803,0.0005713865,0.0013483797,0.009977534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010690943,0.00027614657,0.0004002273,0.00048937293,0.0010220478,0.0010584848,0.0012936114,0.00096666766,0.00036506742],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011282939,0.0006925121,0.48051268,0.00016180509,0.00039307316,0.0029674186,0.0015067963,0.027517809,0.0071427925,0.40326205,0.0035130822,0.07120156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039624228,0.00041965215,0.5934661,0.00011600921,0.0003890913,0.0016392162,0.0035367804,0.031213716,0.003439579,0.36074233,0.0045686173,0.0000727342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004951241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008145544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009977534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011621568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009633202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033378243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039894932","doi":"10.1007/s00148-005-0229-2","title":"Time series analysis and stochastic forecasting: An econometric study of mortality and life expectancy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Life expectancy; Econometrics; Nonparametric statistics; Parametric statistics; Interpretation (philosophy); Stochastic modelling; Aggregate (composite); Econometric model; Series (stratigraphy); Time series; Parametric model; Economics; Statistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Population; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.05190200454123763,"score_gpt":0.3132777123569885,"score_spread":0.26137570781575087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039894932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84967756,0.0044179712,0.13430604,0.00547165,0.00009529639,0.000034105036,0.00020897927,0.000072429124,0.005715944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892051,0.0017852567,0.0071138106,0.00007019077,0.0001439249,0.000015063326,0.000105477404,0.000020301299,0.0015407812],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926764,0.0005089025,0.000026234618,0.000058916707,0.0000703991,0.00006792144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96196234,0.036084026,0.0008399678,0.0003730754,0.0004818254,0.00025868585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004974303,0.0003952576,0.00063657574,0.0013311736,0.0004121509,0.001508359,0.0007606043,0.0013638968,0.0019742975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03739684,0.00033072985,0.0009152902,0.0019435356,0.0012697061,0.002272256,0.00052182225,0.0015781771,0.00013289992],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018574885,0.00025433002,0.07270183,0.000106066494,0.00029785532,0.00047552795,0.0012895765,0.5773009,0.0007456019,0.2983184,0.0027312106,0.04559297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014797735,0.00003530508,0.012800171,0.000018913888,0.00005401823,0.00007564207,0.00029130498,0.90612394,0.00009204958,0.079793684,0.00067579903,0.000024355402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020607118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012291353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020607118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011592093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009294261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04097432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044535401","doi":"10.1007/s00148-007-0151-x","title":"On the contribution of sectoral natural population growth to the aggregate poverty change","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quebec Statistical Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Economics; Population growth; Population; Development economics; Social policy; Decomposition; Differential (mechanical device); Demographic economics; Economic growth; Demography; Biology; Market economy; Sociology","score_opus":0.04025264802584011,"score_gpt":0.30984806900247014,"score_spread":0.26959542097663003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044535401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92118186,0.0035961156,0.015300452,0.016494095,0.0003978507,0.00004234957,0.00080896134,0.00008073409,0.042097617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99616903,0.0013386132,0.0004942927,0.00019740571,0.00013529378,0.000008385859,0.00005875351,0.00001170279,0.0015865286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952185,0.00021197644,0.000018321944,0.00006111445,0.00008669621,0.00010002902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99324,0.0052038794,0.00037626503,0.00029038667,0.0006115856,0.00027791297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027063603,0.0002983789,0.0005199232,0.0007761502,0.00069851585,0.0014448033,0.0005602615,0.000863136,0.004713826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012374754,0.00021962855,0.0006659276,0.00095532724,0.0015848345,0.0010963368,0.0016287194,0.0013530486,0.00025271482],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009333806,0.00021843085,0.22836383,0.0003630446,0.00061088,0.001313505,0.000961928,0.29281762,0.0027000897,0.3758591,0.011436498,0.08442161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006963468,0.00022858611,0.2081136,0.0001208347,0.0005904825,0.0005986743,0.0020649566,0.38404587,0.0017818618,0.3826589,0.01962561,0.00010094944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012246973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009478811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012246973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011917362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011083548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024351358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047741303","doi":"10.1007/s00148-007-0147-6","title":"Parental time and working schedules","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Evening; Time allocation; Working hours; Working time; Social policy; Leisure time; Paid work; Time-use survey; Time budget; Demographic economics; Work (physics); Selection (genetic algorithm); Psychology; Economics; Labour economics; Demography; Medicine; Computer science; Sociology; Engineering; Physical activity","score_opus":0.024690886642814373,"score_gpt":0.2797678610169736,"score_spread":0.2550769743741592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047741303","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99319214,0.00059487496,0.0001968954,0.0003471222,0.00002329447,0.0000052272862,0.00024605938,0.0000027000099,0.005391717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977837,0.00022505329,0.000069274196,0.000020247206,0.000014171296,0.0000038185344,0.000120120596,0.0000034288785,0.0017602347],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965584,0.00016111706,0.000018342249,0.000040343813,0.000042610827,0.00008162648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99241334,0.0037758679,0.0014684151,0.00046275338,0.00036615203,0.0015134999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010910326,0.00016914072,0.000229274,0.0007842862,0.0005628239,0.0010560076,0.00043435756,0.00047947455,0.011603737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00867606,0.00022933763,0.0002948233,0.0008332212,0.0003989348,0.00062167575,0.00045444624,0.0004740639,0.00061608606],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040977544,0.0002493814,0.9771796,0.0000115707035,0.00006333173,0.00033593408,0.0021070591,0.000352972,0.00026877958,0.0032232993,0.00065441756,0.015143861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017337012,0.0000917232,0.9935935,0.000023230481,0.0000423733,0.00023111189,0.0025068724,0.000350302,0.00008942788,0.0014779902,0.0015683462,0.000007778283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009338215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013655211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011603737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003898331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045189846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03881836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053834722","doi":"10.1007/s00148-006-0068-9","title":"Investment in health when health is stochastic","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"demographic modeling and climate adaptation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Stochastic modelling; Economics; Econometrics; Poisson distribution; Investment (military); Random variable; Stochastic control; Stochastic investment model; Stock (firearms); Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Optimal control; Mathematical optimization; Statistics; Financial economics; Finance; Engineering","score_opus":0.10952797231505663,"score_gpt":0.3729910724873634,"score_spread":0.2634631001723068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053834722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8759018,0.0012782252,0.07145023,0.028928403,0.00029517538,0.00011281767,0.0018818481,0.00016093267,0.019990556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930473,0.00042898284,0.0017699443,0.0005761257,0.000101258396,0.000022466153,0.00019399391,0.0000083672685,0.0038516223],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987722,0.00054882345,0.000049807117,0.00017969274,0.00008535336,0.0003641071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918969,0.006006739,0.000870326,0.0003134106,0.00018250245,0.0007302723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028452221,0.0004305883,0.0012070179,0.0005034047,0.00046830685,0.0022368855,0.00067396695,0.003249974,0.008030821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0144215245,0.00076701713,0.00075239217,0.0005596544,0.001680341,0.0021128664,0.0012106807,0.0020182377,0.00032847433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012939171,0.00055255345,0.11327111,0.0002510687,0.00088959053,0.0019939435,0.00058658596,0.47346908,0.0023340136,0.35228124,0.006789777,0.046287034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022260768,0.0006092485,0.042382967,0.00007451344,0.00033387728,0.0008534995,0.0006774866,0.43281817,0.00065505295,0.5177196,0.003559799,0.00009312412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004851092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066945218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008030821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018462946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011230236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02686578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068744844","doi":"10.1007/s001480100109","title":"Optimal food allocation in a slave economy","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Allotment; Productivity; Economics; Property rights; Consumption (sociology); Order (exchange); Value (mathematics); Resource productivity; Resource allocation; Microeconomics; Market economy; Economic growth","score_opus":0.02583528258083292,"score_gpt":0.26961704493811783,"score_spread":0.2437817623572849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068744844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9521217,0.00020634191,0.025810089,0.0025280996,0.000046323017,0.000056835015,0.00015094726,0.000040312207,0.019039406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99201,0.00012079247,0.0027642238,0.00008929386,0.000022239341,0.000024772138,0.000023322817,0.000011018368,0.0049344185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999752,0.00011570302,0.000009001336,0.000033251647,0.000014011707,0.00007592962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909043,0.0004891198,0.0000992527,0.000067673034,0.00006414687,0.00018934952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001148831,0.0002937305,0.0015266503,0.00059626513,0.00097504654,0.0019450439,0.00090798736,0.0017919306,0.008226639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037413358,0.00048107453,0.00046862237,0.00037285712,0.001978466,0.0022840025,0.0013984705,0.0007032128,0.00028197168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013431367,0.00061934214,0.010767358,0.0002648273,0.00017106367,0.0009482801,0.0009227802,0.2260955,0.006003125,0.7211594,0.0059430567,0.025762144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056373264,0.00026440358,0.008345691,0.00004504864,0.00005997118,0.00016201317,0.0013891256,0.36401865,0.0004669289,0.622074,0.0025650861,0.00004543046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044735884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005253668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008226639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014036073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012812531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027520835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077066709","doi":"10.1007/s00148-008-0211-x","title":"Who benefits from paid family leave? Impact of expansions in Canadian paid family leave on maternal employment and transfer income","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Parental leave; Social policy; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Wage; Marital status; Family income; Family Leave; Survey of Income and Program Participation; Work (physics); Transfer (computing); Population; Demography; Sociology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.034575871633452014,"score_gpt":0.27229259111919346,"score_spread":0.23771671948574144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077066709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819903,0.0018331875,0.00004400141,0.007581751,0.000063857035,0.000024405186,0.002097723,0.000007708445,0.0063571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99475527,0.0008475132,0.000051141476,0.00038429812,0.000022800754,0.000010369095,0.0006098081,0.000005590219,0.0033131856],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966092,0.00025157607,0.00008945447,0.00017557615,0.00064665097,0.0022275941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935626,0.0008486253,0.0010589487,0.00015533238,0.0016761171,0.0026983921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019114327,0.00037184157,0.0007959673,0.0014898748,0.005308707,0.0030497075,0.0027575856,0.0017613366,0.009574314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009009808,0.0003539429,0.0016057441,0.0029230246,0.001610536,0.0011439229,0.0029659295,0.003625452,0.00035162005],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008832144,0.00029951867,0.9659822,0.000053001302,0.00016014399,0.00044395946,0.005819198,0.00061967195,0.00020635403,0.0037547587,0.0051910216,0.016586859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001935654,0.00003210454,0.98557,0.00008793587,0.00006528498,0.000058644604,0.010507448,0.00039391808,0.000055004675,0.00018974903,0.002991939,0.0000285968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9966185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07295871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07295871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09371465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52935493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085169443","doi":"10.1007/s00148-005-0221-x","title":"Intergenerational reliance on social assistance: Evidence from Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Employment and Social Development Canada; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Social policy; Unit (ring theory); Social assistance; Government (linguistics); Demographic economics; Demography; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.10653403434776385,"score_gpt":0.35868853449427845,"score_spread":0.25215450014651464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085169443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9672326,0.006179458,0.00016612215,0.002709852,0.000034677996,0.000054583677,0.0063415957,0.000012128405,0.017268931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894154,0.0043834434,0.00017771554,0.00033478317,0.000012503868,0.000018184017,0.0017096451,0.000009548332,0.0039387587],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743456,0.0003023471,0.00010951498,0.00029602877,0.00094623736,0.0009113172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839383,0.003228734,0.0030992802,0.00059428083,0.007066989,0.0020724821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019480009,0.0003998337,0.0007660865,0.0033031602,0.0050325426,0.003026328,0.0021791179,0.0009315902,0.0065120603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009151605,0.0003640439,0.0005894003,0.010480825,0.002215327,0.00091455795,0.0021498278,0.0012594075,0.00030302626],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004930757,0.00018695956,0.94704324,0.00026519145,0.00034482096,0.00042745622,0.008578399,0.0005545624,0.0001325417,0.00467209,0.008692305,0.028609226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054821,0.00004723906,0.9783011,0.00029963654,0.00026279298,0.00009908367,0.010692162,0.00035015447,0.00017450946,0.00036672555,0.00931007,0.00004159258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9982653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99909055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0444838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0444838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060279652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32275403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094243098","doi":"10.1007/s00148-012-0453-5","title":"Optimal prevention when coexistence matters","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Subsidy; Altruism (biology); Spouse; Imperfect; Social policy; Microeconomics; Bargaining power; Social insurance; Public economics; Labour economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Market economy","score_opus":0.04074743407245791,"score_gpt":0.30293314890509726,"score_spread":0.26218571483263936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094243098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6499363,0.002878274,0.109231755,0.094290785,0.0017214954,0.0002518296,0.000435708,0.00035272128,0.14090104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927254,0.000302332,0.0022470867,0.00085590384,0.00031099014,0.000032731477,0.000029481704,0.00001675604,0.0034794183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732,0.001014298,0.000102474565,0.00046262945,0.00018644368,0.0009141488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811411,0.014535691,0.0011880555,0.0009876689,0.0007693256,0.001378139],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003176295,0.0004962277,0.0018197309,0.00076004566,0.0017949287,0.003988575,0.0011233017,0.004744112,0.017537666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024562899,0.00070688105,0.00051615195,0.00038305015,0.0021349357,0.0044238586,0.002045138,0.0037424716,0.0009228504],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001719588,0.0028076847,0.050642394,0.00062952185,0.00035735386,0.0015682776,0.0011787432,0.025707072,0.0034943414,0.71080476,0.032167953,0.16892226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016650178,0.00025603993,0.008233893,0.00014450855,0.00013734531,0.0005958497,0.0016817048,0.046159286,0.0008286245,0.93693995,0.004827271,0.000028987584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017759561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017121948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017537666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009445593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025193205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05866927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095529360","doi":"10.1007/s00148-014-0529-5","title":"Maternity leave and children’s cognitive and behavioral development","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Early Childhood Education and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Cognitive development; Social policy; Maternity leave; Psychology; Child development; Developmental psychology; Medicine; Psychiatry; Political science; Sick leave","score_opus":0.020822915065963645,"score_gpt":0.29990994347630967,"score_spread":0.27908702841034605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095529360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980566,0.00040678214,0.000016024691,0.0002861382,0.000008522751,0.0000024004473,0.00017370096,0.0000027093758,0.0010469916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99887246,0.0002638863,0.000037390684,0.000029578576,0.0000064131004,0.000003338171,0.00013083903,0.0000014021873,0.0006546523],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992223,0.00021283422,0.00004427911,0.00006578794,0.00014016542,0.00031454017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99492943,0.001553373,0.0015280072,0.0002454708,0.00041746272,0.0013262669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013395579,0.00025044355,0.00024323958,0.0007408088,0.0007293963,0.0012912177,0.0006495964,0.000727541,0.003445315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066848802,0.00028616763,0.000801556,0.0010257052,0.000610311,0.000468479,0.0010073603,0.0010339302,0.00025178192],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020285655,0.00040761963,0.99051076,0.000020857964,0.00011053284,0.00025472703,0.0011196368,0.00028790842,0.00020999167,0.00040310711,0.00022652652,0.006245577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004818916,0.00006774655,0.99848324,0.000011954454,0.000023238872,0.000060303268,0.00079544995,0.00009988868,0.00006594499,0.00009501215,0.00028696656,0.0000053964663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.101318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.121982634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.101318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013881227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020316078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20145655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097660706","doi":"10.1007/s00148-016-0600-5","title":"Immigrant employment and earnings growth in Canada and the USA: evidence from longitudinal data","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Columbia Population Research Center; Russell Sage Foundation; National Institutes of Health; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Social policy; Earnings; Immigration; Longitudinal data; Earnings growth; Economics; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Political science; Sociology; Demography; Accounting","score_opus":0.043403044939083306,"score_gpt":0.2835598495392932,"score_spread":0.24015680460020988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097660706","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99193317,0.0011039629,0.00011228491,0.0007643409,0.00003045363,0.000012084596,0.0047754915,0.000008784532,0.0012594985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901674,0.0012845913,0.00013165458,0.0001940962,0.000021634429,0.000016022714,0.0065599214,0.000009127883,0.0016157408],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891627,0.00019085102,0.000082065686,0.00012669014,0.0002709727,0.00041307748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988684,0.0018707437,0.0026900638,0.0006369336,0.004079243,0.002039004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025964936,0.00041979592,0.0005238466,0.002491309,0.0030451007,0.0025570358,0.0014600634,0.0009653719,0.002353271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009337554,0.00032525067,0.00081461656,0.008576865,0.0012897317,0.0009915436,0.0018518646,0.0014965608,0.00044422175],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010072393,0.000060584833,0.9943037,0.000012316622,0.00010649694,0.00005938152,0.0006300616,0.00021099228,0.000027347649,0.00021795373,0.0014266849,0.002843767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013399143,0.000014939929,0.9950362,0.000052091695,0.00007244849,0.000023792207,0.00255921,0.0005410892,0.000041043204,0.000110544104,0.0015176488,0.000017610053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9814175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9874111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018582523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077141016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017321177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055970013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108414999","doi":"10.1007/s00148-005-0028-9","title":"On voters’ attitudes towards unemployment insurance subsidies across regions: a Canadian simulation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Labor market dynamics and wage inequality","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Generosity; Unemployment; Subsidy; Economics; Asset (computer security); Labour economics; Income protection insurance; Social policy; Demographic economics; Insurance policy; Actuarial science; General insurance; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.04622819501319234,"score_gpt":0.28874428111815403,"score_spread":0.2425160861049617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108414999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9821712,0.00026935662,0.00083083037,0.002182984,0.00004413956,0.0000988265,0.002908301,0.000035036486,0.011459486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99100375,0.00020282302,0.00068212603,0.0002435509,0.000013976276,0.000051829065,0.0011398998,0.000018478057,0.006643547],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987319,0.00032415616,0.000021425525,0.00011786242,0.000087382,0.00071727287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99411535,0.003112921,0.00040657044,0.00025358202,0.0012123063,0.0008991576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002412276,0.00051772257,0.0014312024,0.001232689,0.0027856575,0.0021622684,0.0024203116,0.0026450786,0.014320012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00739839,0.00062953506,0.0016832919,0.0022650699,0.0018173524,0.001101831,0.0011581619,0.0021080822,0.00061895256],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023560359,0.0013282417,0.11391802,0.00016186589,0.00045730302,0.00046979196,0.0017156559,0.81514114,0.0005874956,0.03034928,0.023612196,0.009902859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020206429,0.0005700583,0.07040622,0.000084325315,0.0004943522,0.00006206704,0.0070773666,0.9030496,0.00038884202,0.006458569,0.009182472,0.00020543618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97915137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9723766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024773479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024773479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018347003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17974502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122729817","doi":"10.1007/s00148-012-0439-3","title":"Left behind: intergenerational transmission of human capital in the midst of HIV/AIDS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Human capital; Developing country; Population; Transmission (telecommunications); Economics; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Economic growth; Social policy; Demographic economics; Development economics; Demography; Sociology; Medicine; Immunology","score_opus":0.05856114187593433,"score_gpt":0.3491236024975168,"score_spread":0.2905624606215825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122729817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960532,0.00058857485,0.00006896221,0.0015337276,0.000011977369,0.0000029756309,0.000086629254,0.0000013915068,0.0016526255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995196,0.00012567114,0.000013859752,0.000043251897,0.0000055614364,8.6895494e-7,0.000013156446,4.15139e-7,0.00027763873],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995498,0.00016397638,0.000016050932,0.00003743992,0.000032913806,0.00019972477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99758804,0.0010691885,0.000577234,0.00012663828,0.00016170998,0.00047719237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084058335,0.00012004005,0.00019046689,0.0005849779,0.0010463324,0.0016581385,0.000499095,0.0008905373,0.0038083657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063779475,0.00018138316,0.00016195451,0.00073585677,0.0009257103,0.0017174524,0.0013454331,0.0014494156,0.00020997778],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005314276,0.0006108737,0.91324556,0.000042824136,0.00011226373,0.0025537661,0.016413292,0.0017212312,0.0004963627,0.017461091,0.0015448061,0.04526644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022780756,0.00020858884,0.94412464,0.00009812258,0.00007574325,0.0008516575,0.032317158,0.003916994,0.00027897794,0.015236939,0.0028381478,0.00003025992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026899103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03491006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026899103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085805316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078695134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053485036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148455532","doi":"10.1007/s001480100073","title":"\"Living in sin\" and marriage: A matching model","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Matching (statistics); Social policy; Economics; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03256569957431372,"score_gpt":0.26732040267660284,"score_spread":0.23475470310228913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148455532","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7955632,0.0018083946,0.12618084,0.023869079,0.00046246202,0.0004556104,0.002243733,0.00030868003,0.04910805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95927525,0.0011052708,0.0037282603,0.0006947892,0.00025182994,0.00014016646,0.00038270245,0.000030523737,0.034391258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979207,0.0010109266,0.000065772896,0.00033020237,0.00011371009,0.0005587429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99236006,0.0045489715,0.0011949906,0.00038854385,0.0002892688,0.0012182912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050708074,0.0010155351,0.002996707,0.00154249,0.002758433,0.004605581,0.0044836444,0.0072743935,0.027257368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01392624,0.0010194824,0.001383522,0.0031965917,0.002817374,0.0040068226,0.0029504152,0.0033154103,0.0029728906],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014310877,0.002425406,0.04347875,0.00023950636,0.00049601705,0.0021469346,0.002872752,0.20790935,0.0005741072,0.68684757,0.01602154,0.035556994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007259489,0.00035845826,0.005927676,0.00006535927,0.00029510754,0.0005101375,0.002235283,0.6420647,0.000099685705,0.34353563,0.004083979,0.00009805359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023475973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01661684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027257368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024612185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026736406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.091184914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2221513213","doi":"10.1007/s00148-015-0556-x","title":"Intra-household allocation of family resources and birth order: evidence from France using siblings data","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Birth order; Economics; Demographic economics; Order (exchange); Social policy; Firstborn; Uncorrelated; Demography; Sociology; Population; Statistics","score_opus":0.3324371625050623,"score_gpt":0.3880601472758417,"score_spread":0.05562298477077943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2221513213","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959382,0.00035667373,0.00031659112,0.00016497467,0.0000041371795,0.0000072793155,0.0023882324,0.00000743162,0.00081651605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99127215,0.00033830878,0.00062689587,0.000067152694,0.000012056498,0.000025553634,0.0063397856,0.0000123777245,0.0013057522],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977157,0.0013534572,0.00011378241,0.00035884188,0.00023362003,0.00022456115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888887,0.0061415043,0.002257495,0.0010151628,0.0012502623,0.00044691344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032916463,0.00036652226,0.0005185965,0.001991629,0.0008708444,0.0011850359,0.0009966162,0.00070483336,0.0037284156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007816351,0.00030961976,0.0006032999,0.0035545065,0.00054672395,0.0008907099,0.0011325205,0.00048188303,0.00067645503],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020602773,0.00010603811,0.98557633,0.00005245964,0.0003420991,0.00031089626,0.0019024736,0.0010411656,0.00016973194,0.0010176868,0.0020523607,0.00722268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003073105,0.00008871386,0.99150944,0.00006271461,0.00010783515,0.00017996426,0.0024302315,0.0012945408,0.00015368531,0.0003737605,0.0037455228,0.000022751274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2230514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24166523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2230514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012483669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087521464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44350618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336751963","doi":"10.1007/s00148-016-0594-z","title":"The effects of a change in the point system on immigration: evidence from the 2001 Quebec reform","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Immigration; Bachelor; Workforce; Point system; Point (geometry); Immigration policy; Demographic economics; Social policy; Adaptability; Economics; Labour economics; Political science; Economic growth; Market economy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03749775641626555,"score_gpt":0.29652597606924713,"score_spread":0.25902821965298156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336751963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97741246,0.0007923078,0.0001124127,0.006122247,0.00002776713,0.000047977297,0.0011519691,0.000010263468,0.014322611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993342,0.00040289047,0.000060013877,0.0006571373,0.000019645046,0.000017932278,0.00040815468,0.000004371054,0.005087826],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964671,0.0010194016,0.00009625611,0.0002362934,0.00084394583,0.0013370217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860036,0.0035465735,0.0032801135,0.0007167853,0.0046256413,0.0018272884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025715418,0.00021030215,0.0006430267,0.0011210585,0.004314987,0.0031462917,0.0023647894,0.002294559,0.011588948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015515677,0.00025674072,0.0005766527,0.0032951995,0.003942603,0.001245756,0.001985765,0.002475346,0.00060137693],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017773323,0.001054525,0.8897866,0.00024354181,0.00053791644,0.0006237673,0.009471217,0.0061607673,0.0008837192,0.022412961,0.023329731,0.043717977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000115180206,0.0001234716,0.9844974,0.000076271754,0.00015552004,0.000019960877,0.005889361,0.0011886152,0.00015856199,0.00042677097,0.0073193866,0.000029510733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9925035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043943077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043943077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026568403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31883085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2732231295","doi":"10.1007/s00148-017-0658-8","title":"The marital satisfaction of differently aged couples","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Department of Social Services, Australian Government; AGE-WELL","keywords":"Psychology; Duration (music); Marital status; Demography; Panel data; Population; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03127764557099619,"score_gpt":0.30380893530595016,"score_spread":0.272531289734954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2732231295","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99906164,0.00019862325,0.000024447425,0.000092885064,0.000011204382,0.0000027538285,0.00012513243,5.1574324e-7,0.00048284765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99961734,0.00006483922,0.000009655484,0.000026967113,0.00000559798,0.0000014889464,0.0000836616,3.2478667e-7,0.00019009893],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927276,0.00032182768,0.00008121581,0.000060924955,0.000080035556,0.00018314715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976088,0.0005002177,0.0007650656,0.000088994224,0.0002629938,0.0007739953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010359357,0.0001888945,0.00042479107,0.0007883624,0.00077790284,0.0012493565,0.0002840783,0.0007416543,0.003266892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006673637,0.00021672086,0.0005867464,0.001358696,0.0004327934,0.0007902119,0.0009414528,0.00072704366,0.00040222],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016220729,0.00005974715,0.9957486,0.000008218075,0.00008090206,0.00007326926,0.0008896728,0.000046299312,0.00006218157,0.000074983465,0.00008002322,0.002713979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000835074,0.00019273162,0.99524564,0.0000074441655,0.000042929663,0.00011039016,0.0038044495,0.00020632292,0.000030562,0.00009881541,0.0002450339,0.0000074497193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012161889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01338565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012161889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034765524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028324587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0241822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754124584","doi":"10.1007/s00148-017-0665-9","title":"Optimal population and exhaustible resource constraints","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development","keywords":"Social planner; Population; Economics; Population growth; Population size; Constraint (computer-aided design); Value (mathematics); Microeconomics; Social policy; Econometrics; Mathematics; Statistics; Demography; Market economy","score_opus":0.09352465921474525,"score_gpt":0.27960760919850947,"score_spread":0.18608294998376423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2754124584","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58745426,0.0049192817,0.23664145,0.036705792,0.0008489101,0.0001789106,0.003440165,0.0003180672,0.1294931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96063066,0.0013322738,0.012449997,0.0013355113,0.000371312,0.00012421978,0.00038252116,0.00011148185,0.023262082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991235,0.00038230137,0.000036436282,0.00012490399,0.000068895766,0.00026405082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923597,0.0057082144,0.0006341656,0.00024511712,0.0003664407,0.00068628136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022761673,0.0008548044,0.0027540855,0.0010102042,0.00068022363,0.0035482212,0.0021372796,0.0031616916,0.013460365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019173589,0.0016918716,0.0008285476,0.0012103313,0.0023756507,0.005197626,0.002403524,0.0024439238,0.00053801405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016994092,0.00011759817,0.0014961486,0.00020499258,0.00009076664,0.00038720836,0.00017074149,0.431725,0.00037921933,0.54866797,0.009217139,0.0073732017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012060285,0.000038963593,0.001162505,0.000070171605,0.000046911297,0.00012552738,0.00028215567,0.2820313,0.00012409287,0.7131501,0.0028105807,0.00003722914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011134916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006957922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013460365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023581344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002077566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0450294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888621355","doi":"10.1007/s00148-018-0719-7","title":"Endogenous divorce risk and investment","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Flexibility (engineering); Economics; Bivariate analysis; Investment (military); Consumption (sociology); Quality (philosophy); Social policy; Actuarial science; Investment decisions; Microeconomics; Computer science; Sociology; Behavioral economics; Political science","score_opus":0.021455155440789395,"score_gpt":0.20984227075699932,"score_spread":0.18838711531620994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888621355","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94239897,0.004325215,0.012206782,0.00820457,0.00009330162,0.000024397745,0.00029982862,0.000068980575,0.03237779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861748,0.00077377725,0.00022516205,0.00010614946,0.000034838293,0.0000042910783,0.000058714904,0.0000060247175,0.012616193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996946,0.00008050999,0.000014383583,0.00004151503,0.000044538574,0.00012444114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99588853,0.0022505394,0.00086175813,0.00019136662,0.0001915503,0.00061630236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013782595,0.00025854373,0.0006204247,0.00044569187,0.00065091706,0.0035513989,0.00054561876,0.0018592956,0.01075421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009653717,0.00038652334,0.00035559552,0.0006565508,0.0013906864,0.002340502,0.001205705,0.002452019,0.0007020185],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052055425,0.0004883777,0.15106373,0.00010925826,0.00015747182,0.0013083782,0.0012607564,0.03575861,0.0008596608,0.7641,0.0051976508,0.039175443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013092822,0.0001800107,0.08042823,0.000105130064,0.00019157142,0.0005698572,0.0027245388,0.07003526,0.00075314107,0.83320105,0.011609359,0.0000710282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049982113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006262028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01075421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016531951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081773446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03597635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907054267","doi":"10.1007/s00148-018-0726-8","title":"Government Transfers, Work, and Wellbeing: Evidence from the Russian Old-Age Pension","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University; Blackberry (Canada); University of Guelph","funders":"Universität Mannheim; Acadia University","keywords":"Receipt; Pension; Labour economics; Economics; Government (linguistics); Social policy; Work (physics); Demographic economics; Production (economics); Business; Market economy; Macroeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.01714087263421391,"score_gpt":0.2072230379257926,"score_spread":0.1900821652915787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907054267","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99729854,0.00093646237,0.000034687826,0.0001157586,0.000007807898,0.0000039767797,0.00042900714,6.789338e-7,0.0011730249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977272,0.0010759725,0.000021153803,0.000028686785,0.000013594401,0.00000425361,0.0005595151,9.54051e-7,0.0005687258],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995753,0.00015087752,0.000046186196,0.00004995395,0.00006658129,0.000111026675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976922,0.00085810176,0.0007675033,0.00017459049,0.00026612682,0.00024140245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014759226,0.0002732362,0.00045607824,0.0014673504,0.00073641905,0.0007799593,0.00040185457,0.00044512062,0.0030239667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030527434,0.00016312729,0.0005745789,0.0019316438,0.00062982907,0.000473661,0.001170312,0.0005009825,0.0003922038],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041532403,0.00020487553,0.9879189,0.00009296156,0.00029146214,0.0002067969,0.0024678532,0.00012134143,0.00020826982,0.00051059335,0.0004686768,0.007092951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007879993,0.00006095657,0.9966935,0.00003156127,0.00013963293,0.000039067196,0.0020464328,0.000044275053,0.0000406405,0.00007296834,0.0008195468,0.00000347154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037516367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03848444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037516367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004686331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064022245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07459599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2983783862","doi":"10.1007/s00148-019-00755-4","title":"Leadership delegation in rotten kid families","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Agricultural Innovations and Practices","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Social policy; Delegation; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.04882236253229664,"score_gpt":0.2225046063951926,"score_spread":0.17368224386289596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2983783862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99546427,0.00007776688,0.000037870275,0.0008253935,0.000025584755,0.000006535511,0.000015911286,0.0000012810372,0.0035453294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985329,0.000040223083,0.00001979167,0.00007941168,0.000005738355,0.000006992277,0.000007791274,9.618503e-7,0.0013061918],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783546,0.0006418943,0.000040919298,0.00010251696,0.000089695066,0.001289495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930949,0.0016579558,0.0015230734,0.00019367528,0.0004124889,0.0031179588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015570705,0.00014057686,0.00024378729,0.00055517955,0.0039848713,0.0012716134,0.00071323337,0.00074920506,0.0152489785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066063306,0.00014243429,0.00021137526,0.0003918723,0.0012690786,0.0005824979,0.001868664,0.0011939098,0.00039728126],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007464105,0.0018021729,0.8319898,0.00009509289,0.000035625402,0.0076711024,0.09019216,0.00042972254,0.00054788473,0.011485947,0.008208918,0.04679522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012482637,0.0005906232,0.56449354,0.00025430357,0.000026318561,0.002671308,0.41871366,0.0007822845,0.00032438937,0.0032083145,0.008777914,0.00003251781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027809976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05999342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027809976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026241841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028119804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055296183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3024667978","doi":"10.1007/s00148-021-00848-z","title":"Stay-at-Home Orders, Social Distancing and Trust","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Social distance; Government (linguistics); Socioeconomic status; Phone; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Social trust; Distancing; Compliance (psychology); Business; Demographic economics; Public economics; Psychology; Political science; Medicine; Economics; Social psychology; Environmental health; Social capital","score_opus":0.0639527132786672,"score_gpt":0.2720996953415725,"score_spread":0.20814698206290533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3024667978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90187496,0.0016876812,0.014763568,0.014631588,0.00017887613,0.000044000542,0.0007973341,0.00003932979,0.06598257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957573,0.00027025235,0.00020756347,0.00008574496,0.000047850084,0.000005253768,0.000035598387,0.000004442948,0.0035860848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933773,0.0002977215,0.000035636927,0.00006886764,0.00007687658,0.00018318716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871044,0.0075909835,0.0032309543,0.00055652455,0.0004360973,0.0010810699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015006542,0.000217969,0.00048374763,0.00041048368,0.0010155733,0.003258823,0.0004899671,0.0019218561,0.021133328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015742961,0.00019635369,0.00028167665,0.0008219382,0.0025882982,0.0039586867,0.0012201774,0.0021962277,0.0005763711],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009076975,0.000608527,0.07599129,0.00017047227,0.00016845262,0.0007392672,0.0025915664,0.021852959,0.00051615544,0.8477969,0.014730525,0.0339262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017404914,0.00023843093,0.05350577,0.00008990197,0.00009808684,0.00028730847,0.006171791,0.051457774,0.0002549834,0.87846553,0.00918143,0.00007484204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011188914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014733783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021133328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018259188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007690694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07069802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3106110954","doi":"10.1007/s00148-020-00820-3","title":"The COVID-19 pandemic and the 2020 US presidential election","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Counterfactual thinking; Presidential election; Presidency; Pandemic; Demographic economics; Political science; Voting; Presidential system; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Economics; Medicine; Psychology; Virology; Politics; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07177536472799376,"score_gpt":0.299051836429944,"score_spread":0.22727647170195023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3106110954","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30638114,0.019989515,0.004401635,0.38595015,0.009385346,0.000053294993,0.008856693,0.00015119933,0.264831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685308,0.004121957,0.00031582263,0.0048082955,0.0029136748,0.00002534725,0.0011439604,0.000047889258,0.018092256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990903,0.0003434605,0.000024074441,0.000072350274,0.00016263776,0.00030716436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964302,0.0018949021,0.0005492572,0.000093796814,0.0005219506,0.0005099482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029973926,0.00026336336,0.0005942275,0.00065464416,0.0009324468,0.0039918916,0.00032645478,0.0031317319,0.018625923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015639743,0.00023075718,0.00034021895,0.0012357391,0.0007582584,0.0025429053,0.001143425,0.0038465597,0.0011486494],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042816595,0.00018211818,0.032011155,0.00016865655,0.000115364215,0.0005412649,0.00046152025,0.016812626,0.000114803595,0.46613768,0.44474012,0.038286496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002208461,0.0001565981,0.11340237,0.0004583169,0.00017066476,0.00023062408,0.0040212697,0.061486173,0.00033582386,0.5750977,0.24427433,0.00014537312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030180994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030842463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030180994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026371565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018203512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06230992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123745669","doi":"10.1007/s00148-008-0235-2","title":"Self-selection in migration and returns to unobservables","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; HEC Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Health Canada; University of Calgary","keywords":"Unobservable; Earnings; Economics; Econometrics; Nested logit; Logit; Selection (genetic algorithm); Demographic economics; Accounting; Computer science","score_opus":0.014384842739770587,"score_gpt":0.27926470232163264,"score_spread":0.26487985958186205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123745669","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.991169,0.0004951437,0.005465669,0.0010050224,0.000027935024,0.000012391636,0.0000837408,0.000034576733,0.0017065911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99679667,0.0002186659,0.0004277634,0.00005845631,0.000035164667,0.000005957831,0.00004205538,0.000010787167,0.0024044411],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980578,0.0011670963,0.0001017331,0.00021980554,0.000119050164,0.0003344626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9229187,0.062779285,0.006542806,0.0040971097,0.0014109743,0.002251122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00799287,0.00033426422,0.0010924913,0.0013481709,0.0008533242,0.0028081161,0.0008866104,0.0017215213,0.0069825603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039693333,0.00047146395,0.0010603666,0.0015918964,0.0030321504,0.0025624658,0.0015732229,0.002053763,0.0005314937],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00070301373,0.0005555341,0.7758438,0.00015451656,0.0006437422,0.0019747585,0.0023993936,0.035220254,0.001155635,0.14587471,0.0013200176,0.034154635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001740515,0.00040563737,0.6037036,0.00013484064,0.00051829044,0.0009964524,0.0039924006,0.12795468,0.0012701793,0.2583638,0.002357919,0.00012814978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008666517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00884955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008666517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082973315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006663971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04227078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123906566","doi":"10.1007/s00148-019-00731-y","title":"Baby bonus, anyone? Examining heterogeneous responses to a pro-natalist policy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Daughter; Allowance (engineering); Economics; Social policy; Population; Birth order; Demographic economics; Order (exchange); Labour economics; Demography; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.047980341841786574,"score_gpt":0.32242756149883267,"score_spread":0.2744472196570461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123906566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926167,0.000065191,0.00032305866,0.002134289,0.000017119557,0.000022089373,0.00007461331,0.0000020552313,0.0047447276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992434,0.000028139397,0.00007471092,0.00021347907,0.000012173377,0.000023378981,0.000025453459,0.000001917902,0.00037738116],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99329245,0.004999112,0.00017778111,0.0004840793,0.00033228268,0.0007143167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9233593,0.061948508,0.009769921,0.0018892863,0.0011125093,0.0019205202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011453956,0.00022499934,0.00056901964,0.00073874777,0.001531027,0.0026735144,0.0011430347,0.00302025,0.007798735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07498478,0.00025446506,0.00038828462,0.0010251562,0.0019296427,0.0015552739,0.0020524403,0.0029504674,0.000380424],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005579073,0.00366713,0.7996316,0.0002669419,0.0009990195,0.0008785492,0.026024254,0.014581973,0.0025603229,0.0879851,0.0049599656,0.052866127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036077268,0.0014086213,0.82165974,0.00010449313,0.00052442355,0.00018911665,0.08261072,0.028015206,0.001048538,0.055796567,0.008183689,0.000098166616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067896103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066969963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011453956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018112047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008200114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06057501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125778472","doi":"10.1007/s00148-022-00897-y","title":"The effect of education on overall fertility","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Fertility; Download; Developing country; Educational attainment; Earnings; Demographic economics; Economics; Falling (accident); Developed country; Total fertility rate; Distribution (mathematics); Family planning; Labour economics; Economic growth; Demography; Psychology; Population; Sociology; Research methodology; Computer science","score_opus":0.010641202262004929,"score_gpt":0.2844239316832103,"score_spread":0.27378272942120535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125778472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9788536,0.0024503095,0.000280851,0.0028923734,0.00005982264,0.000008277231,0.0012153197,0.000021184052,0.014218274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956338,0.00059589115,0.000051755203,0.00010080886,0.000054505774,0.0000020885532,0.00015146213,0.000004537686,0.0034051999],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991714,0.0003584406,0.00002058613,0.00006429251,0.00005176765,0.0003334629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910965,0.0057762,0.0007953304,0.00034664752,0.0004009269,0.0015843905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001514154,0.00021324692,0.00045867194,0.0008734934,0.00048490474,0.00076731323,0.000564382,0.0007785143,0.013187145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0083700735,0.00018033588,0.0009634138,0.0010833617,0.00096148485,0.00063039816,0.0007817601,0.0013521365,0.0005809153],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017893263,0.0004576167,0.94854903,0.00008218265,0.0005029542,0.00052575755,0.00031112277,0.0040660477,0.00052690244,0.008590495,0.001417029,0.03318156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004709558,0.00026808176,0.99510807,0.000022840186,0.00023717272,0.00016588367,0.00025942863,0.0010800892,0.00024044652,0.0013441261,0.0012177413,0.000009023846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04082507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055334043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04082507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008624093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010173318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08117491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125930534","doi":"10.1007/s00148-003-0152-3","title":"Bayesian analysis of an econometric model of birth inputs and outputs","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Birth, Development, and Health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"National Longitudinal Surveys; Birth weight; Gestational age; Econometric model; Econometrics; Economics; Demography; Mathematics; Statistics; Pregnancy; Sociology","score_opus":0.035291180034879396,"score_gpt":0.2891444966946727,"score_spread":0.25385331665979327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125930534","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14394814,0.0010023828,0.8423924,0.0038166,0.0000831778,0.00011726382,0.00091544556,0.00046523823,0.0072594346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9268625,0.0013217711,0.05356495,0.00028733988,0.00022428432,0.00019874849,0.00088498223,0.00018746234,0.016467944],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971974,0.0016322915,0.00011201465,0.00037613485,0.00034410474,0.00033807906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9634178,0.033058394,0.0014107309,0.00067758234,0.0011219495,0.00031355736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009002995,0.0010526783,0.0029366142,0.0019472741,0.0008649993,0.002943504,0.00246533,0.0034223283,0.0075384355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0415425,0.0022081218,0.0020062525,0.0018662608,0.0021076077,0.0031627947,0.0014830134,0.0034091042,0.0008002994],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001204527,0.00007252297,0.0021031508,0.00004936599,0.00012387964,0.00013332225,0.00013326772,0.8562068,0.00032889747,0.13133919,0.0014475016,0.00794169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004278613,0.000015538271,0.00087238563,0.000013257117,0.0000392476,0.000027385526,0.000022869988,0.95720637,0.00008255143,0.041272078,0.00037717135,0.000028371158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04636574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030901583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04636574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030279977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027375421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092191696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172978014","doi":"10.1007/s00148-021-00861-2","title":"How the earnings growth of US immigrants was underestimated","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Immigration; Earnings growth; Nationality; Demographic economics; Economics; Labour economics; Sample (material); Political science; Accounting; Law","score_opus":0.04317235319680158,"score_gpt":0.2901083008432374,"score_spread":0.24693594764643584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172978014","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91341126,0.0037390382,0.0015626785,0.047170587,0.0008305083,0.000023597047,0.0022551662,0.000044516655,0.030962719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99339056,0.0015091923,0.00030259747,0.001782401,0.0003302858,0.000012029237,0.00050648506,0.000024736215,0.002141796],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976897,0.0009785651,0.00017380808,0.0002895944,0.0005811959,0.00028717803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858694,0.0040707267,0.002265504,0.0010935409,0.005996517,0.00070433854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007078915,0.00025245233,0.00021812598,0.0023118926,0.0010788554,0.0030564696,0.0004921838,0.0005394845,0.0024113846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031419747,0.00019025597,0.00025659436,0.0025400342,0.0011657181,0.002595481,0.0019141582,0.0014219222,0.0004820075],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004993465,0.00006897205,0.65399534,0.00016569835,0.00019801506,0.00040861566,0.021182878,0.000931661,0.0006253158,0.027179467,0.038981996,0.2557626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025249085,0.00015818606,0.79282403,0.001288197,0.00016003604,0.00058665616,0.06004093,0.0054755867,0.001717538,0.02559361,0.11202009,0.00010997071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.086068384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05057336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086068384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016390746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017547098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17113483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193845987","doi":"10.1007/s00148-022-00910-4","title":"Native Americans’ Experience of Chronic Distress in the USA","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Resilience and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Native american; Race (biology); Distress; White (mutation); Gerontology; Demography; Mental health; Medicine; Psychology; Geography; Psychiatry; History; Ethnology; Sociology; Gender studies; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.04866938308410456,"score_gpt":0.4134048546487481,"score_spread":0.36473547156464353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193845987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985884,0.00006032555,0.000008590452,0.00036587342,0.000014186458,0.0000015498963,0.00003224969,5.065673e-7,0.0009283403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999461,0.00009919468,0.000008210789,0.0001623692,0.000009144436,0.0000016523707,0.000030967607,3.9746968e-7,0.0002270119],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997391,0.00010619253,0.000014826782,0.000019981739,0.00003203015,0.00008787079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991761,0.00011695194,0.00021260793,0.0000212749,0.00013047802,0.00034263378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038960853,0.00010695475,0.00015287602,0.00045569212,0.0015069512,0.0011515805,0.00015902908,0.00042034054,0.0014351036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016091893,0.00010341564,0.00012380838,0.0006438568,0.0006534493,0.00067915005,0.0010163437,0.0008742811,0.00010236836],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000141964,0.00033407597,0.9381031,0.000026477219,0.00006193077,0.0007848522,0.048641298,0.000059768023,0.00046460924,0.00035263674,0.0023348532,0.008694472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004650053,0.00008062976,0.8761993,0.000021527461,0.00001868092,0.0003119657,0.12133879,0.000084075575,0.000054652806,0.00009055149,0.0017833844,0.000011788563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07887881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16437998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07887881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052828446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079997454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15683937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238127565","doi":"10.1007/s001480100083","title":"Aboriginals as unwilling immigrants: Contact, assimilation and labour market outcomes","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Census; Trait; Assimilation (phonology); Demographic economics; Selection (genetic algorithm); Geography; Social policy; Demography; Economics; Sociology; Population","score_opus":0.018967502220123812,"score_gpt":0.2918717844485798,"score_spread":0.272904282228456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238127565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99907,0.00008729204,0.0000060753428,0.00012380733,0.0000053314084,0.0000064897254,0.000029854446,5.349124e-7,0.0006706321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991672,0.00008225133,0.000010434232,0.00003901035,0.000005481187,0.0000057474786,0.000043993314,6.667437e-7,0.0006452098],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937975,0.00016645329,0.000028459099,0.00005494237,0.00006646608,0.000303829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99707305,0.0003992184,0.0010011916,0.000098914934,0.00024876013,0.0011788361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011199936,0.00028038363,0.00040194555,0.0008696926,0.0025530378,0.0026811364,0.0007193003,0.0014175066,0.004115681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055788406,0.00020962191,0.00034950124,0.0010930753,0.0009596075,0.0015932703,0.0019521175,0.0016307225,0.00060573703],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055569096,0.00089032354,0.972794,0.000025272484,0.00006365322,0.00084015564,0.018213872,0.0001043117,0.00038192808,0.0006234629,0.0003250783,0.0051823216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029766576,0.000625866,0.92997026,0.000040525225,0.00008440457,0.00043010074,0.06674128,0.00040085896,0.00016547911,0.0007804267,0.00069651037,0.000034458055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06354897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08102041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06354897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007305942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014026881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12635815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4291178503","doi":"10.1007/s00148-022-00916-y","title":"Optimal interventions in networks during a pandemic","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"COVID-19 epidemiological studies","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Texas Rio Grande Valley; Government of Ontario; Université de Sherbrooke","keywords":"Comparative statics; Social policy; Planner; Social planner; Pandemic; Population; Health care; Economics; Psychological intervention; Public economics; Demographic economics; Economic growth; Medicine; Microeconomics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Nursing; Environmental health; Computer science; Disease; Market economy","score_opus":0.2711879421035774,"score_gpt":0.4202197317915906,"score_spread":0.14903178968801323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4291178503","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5407742,0.0014811546,0.36413005,0.01362709,0.00035984986,0.0003926408,0.0020437778,0.00046473512,0.07672647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97716993,0.0003572495,0.010566798,0.00039053144,0.000042847394,0.00020797775,0.00014621526,0.000047541766,0.011070926],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938273,0.00030004684,0.000014164502,0.0001128828,0.000029806799,0.000160325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986394,0.00084001356,0.00021256568,0.000039463117,0.00007916599,0.00018931262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012215809,0.00073722657,0.00084728433,0.00048306078,0.00049860193,0.0012776155,0.0010070902,0.0020885128,0.010465762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066485344,0.00052126526,0.00051075936,0.00034420367,0.0010993681,0.0020613442,0.001334244,0.0011977495,0.0004660355],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018367046,0.00006035463,0.0013210017,0.000055063578,0.000032116033,0.00010949718,0.000090416586,0.9375444,0.00029518374,0.052627377,0.0025476613,0.0051333685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000105394494,0.000089025976,0.00066012365,0.000030256995,0.00002292,0.000032078366,0.00017458505,0.93620735,0.00009294799,0.060626913,0.0019425229,0.000015847281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013346361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008179468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013346361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024477795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016179341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03501147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307128056","doi":"10.1007/s00148-022-00927-9","title":"2023 Kuznets Prize awarded to Garima Rastogi and Anisha Sharma","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Peking University; University of Toronto; University of Texas Rio Grande Valley; Reed College; University of Oklahoma; Sapienza Università di Roma; Jinan University; Baylor University; National University of Singapore; Università Degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emila; Yale University","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Social policy; Human capital; Sociology; Economic growth; Socioeconomic status; Economics; Political science; Population","score_opus":0.026939728710973193,"score_gpt":0.2858941914923507,"score_spread":0.25895446278137746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307128056","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009996582,0.048254516,0.0025626258,0.21669008,0.56558424,0.00017860731,0.0021404375,0.00023354332,0.15435937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06724374,0.01763804,0.001096043,0.0086387,0.07679123,0.00008404611,0.00089964573,0.00026263722,0.8273459],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910647,0.00013859342,0.000056774737,0.00019246727,0.00028579117,0.00021983996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757034,0.00013936567,0.00008196184,0.00007299367,0.0009054072,0.0012298774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019467514,0.0013331661,0.0015617477,0.0014615963,0.0016409548,0.0032604018,0.0006999633,0.0021300642,0.05567434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032488036,0.00030861687,0.00077182625,0.0005750878,0.0008785186,0.0012928981,0.00366355,0.002564408,0.02179481],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020262926,0.000039949336,0.00036667986,0.00007768096,0.000032695345,0.00015798718,0.000063836604,0.00040813058,0.00051961123,0.016476,0.9478758,0.03377906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030107913,0.00007276606,0.0029287157,0.00010899794,0.000020252686,0.00025102097,0.0001407759,0.00054049154,0.00041740946,0.0050532445,0.9904163,0.000019932975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038444716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061892085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05567434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00311469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028757448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18624926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361208539","doi":"10.1007/s00148-023-00946-0","title":"Children having children: early motherhood and offspring human capital in India","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Cognitive Abilities and Testing","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Human capital; Offspring; Sibling; Context (archaeology); Developmental psychology; Developing country; Psychology; Social capital; Fixed effects model; Demography; Panel data; Demographic economics; Economics; Pregnancy; Sociology; Geography; Economic growth; Econometrics; Biology","score_opus":0.018235979547154682,"score_gpt":0.27647783138880955,"score_spread":0.2582418518416549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361208539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977203,0.00019988352,0.000094024086,0.0001280856,0.0000035924309,0.0000019557972,0.0009180325,0.000004937558,0.00092923007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99899715,0.00017179942,0.000062393534,0.000012087904,0.0000030359308,0.0000017673369,0.00047071557,0.0000015290126,0.00027956226],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997284,0.000071416966,0.000017767461,0.000049330156,0.00003918406,0.00009390082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794346,0.00081084954,0.0007138059,0.00016460396,0.0000881707,0.00027913693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041717876,0.00013214753,0.0001802917,0.0006223085,0.0002927844,0.00075270946,0.00038669605,0.00021271994,0.0029353453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016095019,0.0001646032,0.00033654462,0.0013940438,0.00041543692,0.00029032133,0.0009256534,0.0005810606,0.00030719343],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027236903,0.00001395209,0.996393,0.000011682449,0.000049909493,0.00016304485,0.00040594675,0.00033194886,0.000075332275,0.00027804167,0.00025312701,0.0019966834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010804843,0.00001083344,0.9988914,0.000010541316,0.000016639551,0.00010138844,0.0004182766,0.00015629453,0.000037754013,0.000061739775,0.00029054552,0.0000034444447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05088165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05711749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05088165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044489556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043048302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10117096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392606272","doi":"10.1007/s00148-024-01020-z","title":"Conditioning public pensions on health: effects on capital accumulation and welfare","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Global Health Care Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Pension; Social security; Welfare; Overlapping generations model; Economics; Social policy; Public health; Health care; Capital accumulation; Social Welfare; Public finance; Capital (architecture); Labour economics; Public economics; Human capital; Economic growth; Finance; Macroeconomics; Market economy; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.09833535698733069,"score_gpt":0.4566569288339836,"score_spread":0.3583215718466529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392606272","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929716,0.0009546759,0.00045106618,0.0022545161,0.0000732424,0.000047471756,0.0006356839,0.000045864705,0.0025658524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978383,0.00027728698,0.000095428004,0.000115472954,0.00003246539,0.000010950326,0.0001691401,0.0000043346668,0.0014566493],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833727,0.0006389117,0.000066177694,0.00013516287,0.000070000904,0.0007525348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98278135,0.010640352,0.0024957277,0.0009932594,0.00044122466,0.0026481005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004460373,0.00081243203,0.0016341179,0.0007789391,0.0010898422,0.0030091743,0.0009501011,0.002697002,0.01293644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016606651,0.0005698981,0.0017187839,0.0007258616,0.0019340798,0.0016262393,0.002363577,0.0018063585,0.0006299774],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.025995754,0.011864468,0.7805283,0.00039135834,0.0021205677,0.0011681161,0.0010183614,0.08009736,0.0046806484,0.021888493,0.0049171178,0.06532938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001680847,0.0053888485,0.9050675,0.00019528007,0.0017645593,0.0001499133,0.0028689546,0.027643599,0.0055246833,0.04634909,0.0032466014,0.00012013634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025081607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027003206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025081607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023589693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036464545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049871206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393158304","doi":"10.1007/s00148-024-01021-y","title":"Inside the NBA Bubble: how Black players performed better without fans","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Sports Analytics and Performance","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute for Humane Studies, George Mason University; Università degli Studi di Trento; York University","keywords":"Social policy; Economics; Bubble; Advertising; Business; Mechanics; Physics; Market economy","score_opus":0.029320009479300628,"score_gpt":0.225611898321095,"score_spread":0.19629188884179435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393158304","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954041,0.00007446356,0.00022147021,0.00029051138,0.000038837938,0.000015161655,0.00018169286,0.000010496484,0.0037632666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99699306,0.00003280705,0.0001924292,0.00015783965,0.000017340279,0.00003348437,0.00020258664,0.000012079034,0.0023583868],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931455,0.00023507047,0.000025543597,0.00016104929,0.000109466164,0.00015439559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99611133,0.0010520678,0.0008991655,0.00022200239,0.00032613106,0.0013894257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011728599,0.00028911207,0.00049403403,0.00040155626,0.0007696999,0.0015553352,0.00035865832,0.0007410333,0.009331698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054588397,0.00016391797,0.00016516115,0.00024762165,0.00088181545,0.000712609,0.00083089655,0.0008796494,0.0014412743],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01021206,0.0082950145,0.8722307,0.00027791742,0.0004209957,0.00032515245,0.006187041,0.0015652063,0.025590237,0.0043070936,0.016297689,0.054290827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001558485,0.00231296,0.9786395,0.00008081089,0.00010544904,0.000059410027,0.005834584,0.0030638326,0.0023412157,0.002539391,0.0047953287,0.00007168835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013240541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014772611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013240541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048863643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041027417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031217635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400432128","doi":"10.1007/s00148-024-01051-6","title":"The health-maximizing level of labor supply: a macroeconomic perspective on the American Health Puzzle","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Global Health Care Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fondation du Risque; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Aix-Marseille Université; York University; Mutuelle Générale de l'Education Nationale; New York University Abu Dhabi","keywords":"Economics; Depreciation (economics); Labour economics; Disadvantage; Human capital; Health care; Demographic economics; Health equity; Stock (firearms); Economic growth; Capital formation; Financial capital; Political science","score_opus":0.13014624138512493,"score_gpt":0.4778459877895994,"score_spread":0.3476997464044745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400432128","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12741624,0.039391868,0.029747603,0.6979305,0.0016356239,0.000043841665,0.0017837029,0.0000934057,0.10195724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9537066,0.01780877,0.002937812,0.012824899,0.0063235327,0.000050390117,0.00023076846,0.000038277354,0.006078997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917656,0.00039523316,0.000042652304,0.0001495803,0.00010043103,0.00013554964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99674785,0.0019414434,0.00052394863,0.00014864291,0.000266458,0.00037156814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033083775,0.0005458598,0.0010763007,0.0011727934,0.0011047918,0.004762576,0.0009940625,0.0043878844,0.005387163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009828913,0.00045387723,0.0007807446,0.0017013743,0.0032510571,0.004499247,0.0015644254,0.004322968,0.0002661516],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010349535,0.000062156076,0.0042088465,0.00012781456,0.00006442336,0.00017902357,0.0002949028,0.011181945,0.00033621816,0.9556817,0.0135966465,0.014162891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004468884,0.000023992796,0.0045262193,0.00014182892,0.000032626715,0.00010442978,0.00039427457,0.0071588457,0.00009248834,0.975895,0.011559356,0.000026217125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068639372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005681441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068639372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030073223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021977066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02181977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403043082","doi":"10.1007/s00148-024-01046-3","title":"Financial education as a complement to public pensions: the case of naive individuals","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Social policy; Public finance; Complement (music); Business; Finance; Economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.026625961534726465,"score_gpt":0.2841280277624308,"score_spread":0.25750206622770433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403043082","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96051425,0.0003190071,0.0005775386,0.012146107,0.000038153194,0.000027567992,0.00005673538,0.000008775519,0.026311874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99679595,0.00010753015,0.00014739583,0.00031143526,0.000030095674,0.0000048810725,0.0000095885,0.0000017524014,0.0025913417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992519,0.00025000895,0.000023321816,0.00005628939,0.000055079814,0.00036335975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99522346,0.0025406622,0.0005723445,0.00020202197,0.0001905443,0.0012709976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018484321,0.00026017826,0.0006877807,0.00069666404,0.0030746069,0.0033161668,0.0009012965,0.0056840447,0.014132383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063189045,0.00031425332,0.00051857997,0.0006147903,0.0033928617,0.0022465095,0.0017627547,0.0026128066,0.00043942028],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003035299,0.006556424,0.32127753,0.00024442925,0.00024733893,0.057066098,0.023641355,0.009290118,0.0024680877,0.48224413,0.0143244015,0.07960478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036852956,0.0026159813,0.26475897,0.00047105856,0.00068622985,0.019187966,0.09378745,0.07593695,0.0015244826,0.51060104,0.026370885,0.00037376623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02757151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02864535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02757151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012258079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018797894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054822028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408003316","doi":"10.1007/s00148-025-01092-5","title":"Religiously inspired baby boom: evidence from Georgia","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Social policy; Boom; Baby boom; Economics; Development economics; Sociology; Demography; Population; Geology; Market economy","score_opus":0.029042516664616477,"score_gpt":0.3398265694240895,"score_spread":0.310784052759473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408003316","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9847823,0.0020436875,0.00019901722,0.002974468,0.00007311212,0.000055555563,0.0012209142,0.0000052858854,0.008645681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99635386,0.0010523065,0.00014164903,0.0012695031,0.00002387029,0.000030776388,0.00036875284,0.000004271006,0.0007550089],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985353,0.0008296514,0.000046340458,0.00022932306,0.00016127108,0.00019811104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914193,0.0038628145,0.0026767359,0.00085471006,0.00056417024,0.00062219804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022704513,0.00016733508,0.00030121134,0.0006477337,0.00096597575,0.00059887307,0.00080601336,0.000788675,0.0056098504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008002154,0.000215619,0.00033504784,0.00114062,0.0015239633,0.00028411433,0.001230891,0.0012271467,0.00051175867],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011830538,0.0006380569,0.9285937,0.0010031365,0.0006671193,0.000868654,0.011849615,0.00021401068,0.00042328658,0.004158337,0.010462935,0.039938092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058502214,0.00021706028,0.985852,0.00040773608,0.00016616407,0.000077464494,0.0062321215,0.00009846556,0.00008470698,0.00032384016,0.0064709536,0.000011025122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078134164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15147598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078134164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011333013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016878021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15535879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416344219","doi":"10.1007/s00148-025-01132-0","title":"Counting missing women: a reconciliation of flow and stock measures","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Population Economics","topic":"Global Maternal and Child Health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Dalhousie University; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Stock (firearms); Social policy; Missing data; East Asia; South asia; Developing country","score_opus":0.018305555233218185,"score_gpt":0.27753295370760306,"score_spread":0.25922739847438486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416344219","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34835175,0.0017227456,0.63487977,0.005023593,0.000656214,0.00036126483,0.002539021,0.0005011979,0.005964512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90890115,0.00038045793,0.08712337,0.0004934691,0.00033501346,0.00018960473,0.0010180145,0.00007872231,0.0014801165],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9757342,0.019220375,0.00096078013,0.001510158,0.0020540573,0.0005204989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8953329,0.06820601,0.009567239,0.017548712,0.008673809,0.0006714064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04362912,0.00067098904,0.0011813039,0.0036836786,0.00053752994,0.0020790247,0.0025964936,0.0010803501,0.0022950189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19280532,0.00037623398,0.0011402691,0.0035893808,0.0013882635,0.0031262585,0.0023131324,0.0012024845,0.000250846],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006686501,0.00021685769,0.37633315,0.0004509546,0.0013469259,0.00036909073,0.0026028766,0.051103234,0.00062749104,0.16080041,0.013183632,0.39229664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002672385,0.00072138786,0.19983411,0.0007748974,0.0010286209,0.0005854674,0.0021054086,0.49581426,0.0060001793,0.27237496,0.020209739,0.00028375073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00521293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030131384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04362912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011262402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013665134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2307356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}