{"meta":{"query_hash":"b455eee42b5f","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Poverty and Social Justice"},"cohort_total":14,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"exported":14,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/b455eee42b5f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Poverty+and+Social+Justice"},"results":[{"id":"W2330827202","doi":"10.1332/175982711x574012","title":"Poverty, social movements and community health: the campaign for the Special Diet Allowance in Ontario","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Poverty and Social Justice","topic":"Obesity and Health Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Grassroots; Poverty; Allowance (engineering); Social movement; Context (archaeology); Health care; Political science; Welfare; Health professionals; Intersection (aeronautics); State (computer science); Sociology; Economic growth; Politics; Geography; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.17014968101462893,"score_gpt":0.4221013975851769,"score_spread":0.25195171657054793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2330827202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7991367,0.0029243566,0.00028439457,0.10424035,0.00031510394,0.00018433636,0.0002585649,0.000019523675,0.09263673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.959059,0.0017673529,0.00024113634,0.0038496451,0.00007975193,0.00007628075,0.0000649409,0.000018238683,0.03484367],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779475,0.0004349099,0.000037397247,0.000088007204,0.00043480578,0.0012102751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997595,0.00044132755,0.00027016405,0.000044843713,0.00028908707,0.0013595311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013916284,0.00020966209,0.00025910017,0.0009055893,0.027707206,0.003155998,0.0011406798,0.0017140509,0.0043803127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002851958,0.00031980887,0.00024010589,0.001968731,0.008195646,0.0011720083,0.0046285666,0.0021724591,0.00013873941],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027742612,0.00018840334,0.08887223,0.00051294843,0.000051943363,0.004195296,0.72201973,0.00048252047,0.0021674,0.062923804,0.05859036,0.05971788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055530036,0.000086611835,0.23562314,0.00021001324,0.000027331162,0.00019493584,0.438543,0.00020685235,0.0003099294,0.002447321,0.32223177,0.000063688094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9920108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99847823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10700794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10700794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12991305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77640057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789640168","doi":"10.1332/175982718x15200701225214","title":"‘To tell you the truth, no job is legit’: an exploration of justice for Hanoi's marginalised urban migrants","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Poverty and Social Justice","topic":"Vietnamese History and Culture Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Mitacs; York University","keywords":"Economic Justice; Face (sociological concept); State (computer science); Sociology; Economic growth; Political science; Criminology; Public administration; Law; Social science; Economics","score_opus":0.05667341211693335,"score_gpt":0.3321936258835193,"score_spread":0.275520213766586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789640168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94278777,0.0017923147,0.0006871375,0.022451352,0.00024479436,0.00007085653,0.00002198733,0.000011417324,0.031932335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920133,0.000652229,0.00019519696,0.0017468075,0.00003605987,0.000028033632,0.000008243547,0.000010608996,0.005309582],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980205,0.0013457147,0.000025375564,0.00006137236,0.00008673523,0.00046031162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874675,0.00061736064,0.00015178637,0.000045556324,0.000115657145,0.00032283933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027824817,0.00039335445,0.0003692811,0.00066567824,0.020044351,0.0060448283,0.0011185975,0.0018563016,0.0027811392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025052165,0.00032937713,0.00020284824,0.00069561054,0.018374918,0.0043949583,0.0050735436,0.0033224074,0.00017465139],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056663566,0.00001412932,0.0008899413,0.000034649656,0.0000014796792,0.0006352325,0.9873444,0.000010740311,0.000105136525,0.008112878,0.0008261974,0.0020195704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011493623,0.000012506809,0.0008327368,0.00004646387,0.0000013758087,0.00011025033,0.98825234,0.0000237441,0.000039962633,0.00080324186,0.009873064,0.0000031360046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035234995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06934156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035234995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005114219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066379644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07005978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980482161","doi":"10.1332/175982719x15687180682342","title":"Poverty in lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and two-spirit (LGBTQ2S+) populations in Canada: an intersectional review of the literature","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Poverty and Social Justice","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Transgender; Gender studies; Lesbian; Poverty; Indigenous; Sociology; Intersectionality; Sexual orientation; Sexual minority; Political science","score_opus":0.08654709569107691,"score_gpt":0.39900602264878654,"score_spread":0.3124589269577096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980482161","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10197889,0.85653114,0.00034378903,0.019308949,0.00039262202,0.00010476077,0.0023836507,0.000022937493,0.0189333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3447425,0.65011096,0.00071100204,0.0025874684,0.00013727152,0.000102588805,0.0005792187,0.000020219011,0.0010086995],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963825,0.00079256267,0.00038490913,0.00029802448,0.0013817213,0.0007602175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98877,0.0034981712,0.0016050689,0.00016004108,0.004953007,0.001013677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048526,0.00047462934,0.0009968427,0.01036598,0.009944255,0.008177933,0.0014739768,0.0009555411,0.0022096206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011482162,0.00043225515,0.00069638394,0.022507265,0.0057166493,0.0022514455,0.0037472765,0.0013636338,0.00014907327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019799365,0.000086882275,0.19575551,0.04149647,0.00072865654,0.0024243018,0.21465361,0.0004976354,0.00048559846,0.02328951,0.050344884,0.47003904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015194772,0.00007031896,0.33196145,0.069823295,0.00090741296,0.0013544792,0.35032287,0.00020604377,0.00038899633,0.0033792576,0.24137582,0.00019492368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9820226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99245995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053951044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053951044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20265153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39144403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176413069","doi":"10.1332/175982721x16210003919853","title":"Thatcher’s ‘Right to Buy’ reform at 40: a policy feedback analysis of UK social housing policies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Poverty and Social Justice","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Landlord; State (computer science); Public housing; Public administration; Economics; Welfare state; Political science; Political economy; Economic growth; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.031610421322190566,"score_gpt":0.3145449253606712,"score_spread":0.28293450403848064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176413069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65990025,0.0024694083,0.0064304788,0.10790683,0.00044639796,0.0001494156,0.00033980867,0.00009345803,0.22226389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870085,0.00033671912,0.00043647346,0.0021694892,0.000037940335,0.000039518694,0.000023216693,0.000018745199,0.009929337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99323237,0.002552822,0.00021645248,0.0005168045,0.0012067052,0.0022748574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99369794,0.0035296686,0.0007948411,0.00035604334,0.0011025355,0.0005190707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054802177,0.00025339978,0.00032071784,0.0014006984,0.0038233916,0.005634314,0.0008264364,0.0049006664,0.0068108207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02057616,0.00030589875,0.00042472687,0.0012334178,0.007845122,0.0055781687,0.0038157569,0.002968425,0.00040888457],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019970769,0.000085803964,0.0051325415,0.00015455601,0.000025353494,0.00080519816,0.035823166,0.00275795,0.00091089366,0.9202641,0.011275461,0.022565309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022764715,0.0005039151,0.103045106,0.0012302609,0.00011412574,0.00040079962,0.08106887,0.010134149,0.00419239,0.2567721,0.54198647,0.00032413768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12001614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12088073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12001614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032687437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010720431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23863518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184963326","doi":"10.1332/175982721x16231309013027","title":"From Working Tax Credit to Universal Credit: is the older workforce ready? Perspectives from employees and employers in Northern Ireland","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Poverty and Social Justice","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conditionality; Workforce; Receipt; Work (physics); Welfare; Labour economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Tax credit; Business; Demographic economics; Economics; Economic growth; Political science; Accounting; Public economics","score_opus":0.04198291458741412,"score_gpt":0.3493198682702849,"score_spread":0.3073369536828708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184963326","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9677538,0.0016957229,0.00010035483,0.01869062,0.00024176184,0.00002150583,0.000035677393,0.0000049962964,0.011455511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99064624,0.0012777596,0.00005837097,0.0046819407,0.000053106636,0.000022009013,0.00001472228,0.000008416733,0.0032374198],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99446905,0.0024801006,0.00024320299,0.00025485244,0.00054103637,0.002011809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931056,0.0021961525,0.0009330421,0.00015489536,0.00089906494,0.002711259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006860463,0.00031328233,0.00066119,0.00080027914,0.0104829315,0.0079173865,0.0015965125,0.0022992492,0.0027100155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00880102,0.0006047128,0.0004044111,0.0008657438,0.0077988976,0.005305281,0.008313844,0.005661991,0.00034909215],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028793993,0.000038851453,0.011148923,0.00011196055,0.000005261499,0.00085686834,0.97957546,0.000013278531,0.00027110003,0.00082342274,0.0023328832,0.0047932407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.615749e-7,0.000014519052,0.002463923,0.00009035729,0.0000018220254,0.00007080371,0.9930729,0.000005611564,0.000021067533,0.000053395313,0.004199258,0.000005342794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08970603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15187706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08970603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008869594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010758513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1783678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231950273","doi":"10.1332/175982714x13976528630358","title":"Conservatives, partisan dynamics and the politics of universality: reforming universal social programmes in the UK and Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Poverty and Social Justice","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Universality (dynamical systems); Politics; Restructuring; Popularity; Political science; Political economy; Citizenship; Welfare; Economics; Development economics; Law","score_opus":0.01691526387683806,"score_gpt":0.2813331806710458,"score_spread":0.26441791679420773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231950273","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8231058,0.005580199,0.000614252,0.0659865,0.00030417248,0.000080824066,0.00015113104,0.00002406892,0.10415307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98745733,0.0009724416,0.00010745868,0.0032491286,0.00002375391,0.000013850036,0.000020913749,0.000012306947,0.008142794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882609,0.0016073927,0.00018986018,0.00053261593,0.0022281334,0.0071809376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908257,0.0019109685,0.0006604965,0.0002513749,0.0018504059,0.0045010154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056263157,0.0002493378,0.0006168219,0.0019596207,0.0299723,0.009451845,0.0013839193,0.0033736115,0.0035588716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013543229,0.00037787488,0.00041083543,0.0025473551,0.01616011,0.0019069576,0.007434468,0.005203206,0.00013557586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061411766,0.00018019657,0.052218076,0.0003485465,0.00015193492,0.0019939926,0.21708348,0.0022294587,0.0013265227,0.6249662,0.031416826,0.06747063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017889868,0.00014654156,0.24877338,0.0008474396,0.00017653569,0.00029732203,0.2562095,0.001578442,0.0015382849,0.027012266,0.4628702,0.00037124424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98651403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9927241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14446822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14446822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13803847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9922956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312505915","doi":"10.51952/ozgc6238","title":"Creating submissive subjects: lone mothers and social assistance regimes in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Poverty and Social Justice","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Qualitative research; Focus group; Sociology; Welfare; Inclusion (mineral); Subjectivity; Gender studies; Political science; Social science; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.01495550143475576,"score_gpt":0.27559355961310883,"score_spread":0.26063805817835306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312505915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900974,0.0003400609,0.00016456681,0.0023488787,0.000030820556,0.000033997738,0.000043666954,0.000006381161,0.0069342726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996566,0.00028024777,0.00013123732,0.0002993736,0.000004224192,0.000015257929,0.000023382785,0.0000072074863,0.002672945],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956273,0.0011349157,0.00006873466,0.00031769014,0.0006507181,0.002200567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99528044,0.0009528579,0.00066146016,0.00017721481,0.00080926786,0.0021186548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038077107,0.0003961737,0.0006336132,0.001155729,0.04034109,0.0057306434,0.0016820832,0.0010349454,0.0026930482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005943306,0.00047429043,0.00026079814,0.0013966304,0.013331758,0.0016733451,0.008339922,0.0022437933,0.00011584067],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006519593,0.00005069369,0.042471644,0.000041294097,0.000010974493,0.0010027306,0.93711567,0.000061940904,0.0005897929,0.004423147,0.0019708194,0.012196115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053756708,0.00002502079,0.032566465,0.000068078254,0.000007801441,0.000100418445,0.9517545,0.00006909977,0.00018486928,0.0003850185,0.014806894,0.000026440455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9689584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9907939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07255414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07255414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10377924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52641964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312535474","doi":"10.51952/ixzk6157","title":"Research Round-Up","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Poverty and Social Justice","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Poverty; Newspaper; Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Independence (probability theory); Political science; Foundation (evidence); Public relations; Public administration; Law; Economics; Accounting; Engineering","score_opus":0.07589493431945987,"score_gpt":0.30338015967777954,"score_spread":0.22748522535831966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312535474","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015289028,0.02138565,0.0046976805,0.19822353,0.30583578,0.00492078,0.02658291,0.002237216,0.43458757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0070578107,0.012873261,0.004750926,0.083320364,0.042461943,0.005956167,0.013811288,0.0014411747,0.82832706],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.988395,0.0034911865,0.0009894492,0.0015686506,0.0041109053,0.0014447235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9433054,0.0063408026,0.0014690737,0.006983049,0.027831214,0.014070549],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016865704,0.0015032857,0.0013777234,0.0041241995,0.003647867,0.010131851,0.0040014545,0.008433468,0.6152287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053786743,0.00068662217,0.0018651916,0.002830778,0.0013459835,0.0063343155,0.00785748,0.0064244824,0.43678522],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013151107,0.000047347774,0.00009602993,0.0006476759,0.00000839634,0.00010961984,0.00010534721,0.000022246444,0.00018017602,0.0033432532,0.9489849,0.04632358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026124671,0.000044899854,0.00025410904,0.0006013774,0.0000045715897,0.000049628234,0.00016237158,0.000009555903,0.000085676744,0.0014101418,0.99734384,0.000007688385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032449453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005389785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6152287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005583305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021477003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54882956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312927205","doi":"10.51952/grrd9140","title":"Research Round-Up","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Poverty and Social Justice","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Devolution (biology); Government (linguistics); Poverty; Work (physics); Social security; Public policy; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Public economics; Economics; Economic growth; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.07589493431945987,"score_gpt":0.30338015967777954,"score_spread":0.22748522535831966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312927205","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018351536,0.03534265,0.0069797435,0.13246535,0.194282,0.008379204,0.036285765,0.002691805,0.58173835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0099317925,0.024292875,0.008216614,0.07254206,0.029854095,0.0104044955,0.024701238,0.0020070658,0.81804967],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.989032,0.0038126449,0.001247743,0.0015124914,0.0031712146,0.0012239724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9419446,0.008813049,0.001735164,0.007773573,0.028452616,0.011280982],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016201792,0.0014695486,0.0015773575,0.0057427404,0.0034593937,0.0084658405,0.004347157,0.0066447533,0.650219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05432453,0.000690028,0.0016981225,0.004546088,0.0014160702,0.0070362794,0.0072862864,0.0052841906,0.44936013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016752146,0.00006306528,0.00012254763,0.001958315,0.000011504345,0.000110204186,0.00019948835,0.000025096666,0.00021646844,0.0041598263,0.8988569,0.094108984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033696855,0.000059639086,0.00027685452,0.0015595006,0.0000076218,0.000065156695,0.00026733254,0.000009054142,0.00010245826,0.0015995698,0.9960104,0.000008603156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030280594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046126493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.650219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049490915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019058092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49892008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312963507","doi":"10.51952/cqiq1894","title":"Rhetoric and retrenchment: ‘common sense’ welfare reform in Ontario","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Poverty and Social Justice","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Workfare; Retrenchment; Welfare reform; Welfare; Context (archaeology); Rhetoric; Welfare state; Political science; Social policy; Work (physics); Social Welfare; Political economy; Economics; Public administration; Politics; Market economy; Law; Engineering; Geography","score_opus":0.03069048082301542,"score_gpt":0.27831519672474997,"score_spread":0.24762471590173454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312963507","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21926305,0.0074372566,0.0053835018,0.424317,0.0013624448,0.00035778325,0.00019744532,0.00013566569,0.34154588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94875306,0.0014180536,0.0012633147,0.013154535,0.00020693203,0.0000886412,0.000038233484,0.00004655191,0.03503067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.981473,0.005735969,0.00063148304,0.001596579,0.005775485,0.00478744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845073,0.0060353745,0.0011088077,0.0009692729,0.005363713,0.0020155187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017950619,0.00042322784,0.00070032256,0.001955868,0.043362834,0.01015861,0.003302198,0.0061949333,0.0036783132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023625052,0.00046247506,0.00051640515,0.003635959,0.046600133,0.00495301,0.008895562,0.005699759,0.00020248185],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008969087,0.00004791672,0.0036683027,0.00027463236,0.000019930361,0.00059415505,0.25549427,0.0008000413,0.0008284093,0.6726634,0.037298366,0.028220894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007021211,0.0000626663,0.011970303,0.00033561204,0.000057796457,0.00009635797,0.10870352,0.0012075583,0.00088515773,0.055510346,0.82097566,0.00012471432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98308945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.989036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.312685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.312685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26810133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.797188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318540809","doi":"10.1332/175982721x16661952940144","title":"Is research the new advocacy? Mobilising social science research through ‘solutions-focused advocacy’","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Poverty and Social Justice","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Trent University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Leverage (statistics); Political science; Government (linguistics); Policy advocacy; Public administration; Politics; Qualitative research; Public relations; Food security; Economic growth; Sociology; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.7834460503153192,"score_gpt":0.7109595715891255,"score_spread":0.07248647872619374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318540809","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031235307,0.0071915556,0.0072605335,0.8831155,0.0017216275,0.00022774744,0.0000617722,0.000048434405,0.0691376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8673948,0.011006494,0.016158924,0.0903584,0.000836015,0.00069925643,0.00009636757,0.00011860481,0.013331195],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8687767,0.10044316,0.0025609815,0.005045484,0.01554976,0.0076239146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8420495,0.11095366,0.006946679,0.009025991,0.014201354,0.01682276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1401891,0.00081611297,0.0014173728,0.00503287,0.032173768,0.029379899,0.003316597,0.0083676,0.0091964435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10683488,0.00078182336,0.00100675,0.006046708,0.10762106,0.025307728,0.019357467,0.014357225,0.0011195659],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049780894,0.00012205878,0.0037505222,0.0011076593,0.000059241906,0.0004754615,0.49041757,0.00016775043,0.0010824571,0.42121553,0.02586005,0.055691965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003832984,0.00006970175,0.0012228601,0.0025060428,0.00004907855,0.00016803016,0.4310918,0.00029651355,0.00048266238,0.16548938,0.3985143,0.000071326926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11463335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18614294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1401891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043024644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20448235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74139965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393074792","doi":"10.1332/17598273y2024d000000016","title":"‘Covering all the [welfare] basics’: a critical policy study of the Expert Panel on Basic Income report in British Columbia, Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Poverty and Social Justice","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Manitoba; Royal Roads University","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Welfare; Basic income; Economics; Political science; Public economics; Law","score_opus":0.03373973013969267,"score_gpt":0.33552613274818277,"score_spread":0.3017864026084901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393074792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5680734,0.009304503,0.0014715398,0.28871533,0.0012344486,0.00069449557,0.0005448365,0.000053677206,0.1299078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9537401,0.0027902818,0.000919489,0.026664322,0.000099384204,0.00024315751,0.00014380773,0.000057558565,0.015341854],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9652362,0.014788745,0.0007519026,0.0018343768,0.0066022957,0.010786404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92013365,0.043173537,0.002488898,0.0014370226,0.02419658,0.008570227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05198481,0.00060193887,0.0007661278,0.0037511846,0.07247997,0.023240788,0.004432153,0.008021759,0.0034384914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06737258,0.00086605735,0.00039837047,0.00622093,0.033594213,0.0051645013,0.0074497685,0.0129704485,0.00027644084],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097703465,0.00012845988,0.0093221115,0.0003847119,0.000023316014,0.0012566525,0.79633665,0.00036772585,0.00064028974,0.09746343,0.07139903,0.022579882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019149295,0.0000271336,0.012217226,0.000767331,0.00002325823,0.000047908838,0.8049725,0.00020841656,0.00028745332,0.0030232186,0.1783039,0.0001025184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9872416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99036586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34313843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.34313843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.42713925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76186633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401630911","doi":"10.1332/17598273y2024d000000028","title":"Corrigendum to ‘“Covering all the [welfare] basics”: a critical policy study of the Expert Panel on Basic Income report in British Columbia, Canada’ by Tracy Smith-Carrier et al","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Journal of Poverty and Social Justice","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Manitoba; Royal Roads University","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Panel data; Economics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.03587073727362338,"score_gpt":0.34062866641551065,"score_spread":0.30475792914188726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401630911","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001488586,0.0030214384,0.00021706826,0.42766073,0.54414123,0.00012205695,0.0030048094,0.00018985673,0.021493971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020626432,0.0035350786,0.00063167245,0.6441647,0.06650079,0.00037847413,0.0013184723,0.0003271699,0.28108102],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98717463,0.0015135028,0.0014769953,0.0013322509,0.0063883155,0.0021143528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9466566,0.011283084,0.001085279,0.0013511529,0.03690216,0.0027217048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009394099,0.0022345057,0.0031873095,0.005311283,0.014800279,0.011643311,0.0065118265,0.027535437,0.052229278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058106624,0.0019958226,0.0027841255,0.004740885,0.0054092747,0.0034689198,0.0040191803,0.02839267,0.029104348],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027348663,0.0000017663957,0.000013786381,0.000013645308,0.0000013340579,0.000011435569,0.000013566159,0.0000058155665,0.0000030516392,0.00020816068,0.99937207,0.00035255135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027355598,0.000006469231,0.0013212166,0.00035989785,0.00003233459,0.000030164483,0.00030443005,0.00009193566,0.00005951888,0.001033352,0.9966779,0.000055560668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8101563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89534163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18984371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04614307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07223357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38192344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401838289","doi":"10.1332/17598273y2024d000000029","title":"The place of a basic income in the search for a more just society: a comment on ‘”Covering all the [welfare] basics”: a critical policy study of the Expert Panel on Basic Income report in British Columbia, Canada’ by Tracy Carrier-Smith et al","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Poverty and Social Justice","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Basic income; Welfare; Basic needs; Public economics; Economics; Political science; Poverty; Economic growth; Law","score_opus":0.0424140579371301,"score_gpt":0.3707814802951471,"score_spread":0.328367422358017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401838289","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003602178,0.0024235945,0.000099362296,0.9909819,0.0044056424,0.000010784631,0.000054139466,0.000010463174,0.0016538562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0062534004,0.0012450202,0.00021388798,0.98681635,0.0028391466,0.00003464328,0.000025619885,0.000038602102,0.0025333134],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9450938,0.015985556,0.002718965,0.0050894986,0.020623926,0.010488305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8398391,0.097690836,0.005846466,0.0025860586,0.044684563,0.0093529485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.054781232,0.0016352291,0.002627738,0.0032504655,0.034712583,0.021859836,0.01388621,0.074671865,0.0068161585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12141338,0.0015853099,0.002411058,0.0050801192,0.06378794,0.014975266,0.008365753,0.08849768,0.0018526705],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027542214,0.000008155637,0.00022942404,0.00021405463,0.000013705697,0.00014678125,0.008672041,0.00006779653,0.00010114794,0.035874456,0.95232445,0.0023205392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006139243,0.000028911778,0.0017256836,0.0019252549,0.00007023295,0.00011934319,0.02168728,0.00018492555,0.0005530564,0.017573722,0.95578146,0.0002887608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8641635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8766207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13583648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10655163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21461803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7730898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}