{"meta":{"query_hash":"de68fc462177","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Pragmatics"},"cohort_total":35,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":35,"exported":35,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/de68fc462177","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Pragmatics"},"results":[{"id":"W1971196298","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2009.04.009","title":"Subjects and topics in conversation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Utterance; Subject (documents); Conversation; Pronoun; Subject pronoun; Linguistics; Casual; Expression (computer science); Realization (probability); Conversation analysis; Psychology; Personal pronoun; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.029841164348793015,"score_gpt":0.2813031788552792,"score_spread":0.2514620145064862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971196298","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20242839,0.015976202,0.0745668,0.027614485,0.0008972771,0.00032041702,0.0004874281,0.0003580327,0.67735106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736607,0.0018796324,0.006302579,0.00047506104,0.00029332712,0.00015002758,0.00018368306,0.00023340157,0.016821582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99083143,0.007316275,0.00028699348,0.00049085804,0.0006850899,0.0003892981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99020994,0.007859839,0.00044696464,0.0004491468,0.0005626986,0.0004714384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072091157,0.00063966314,0.0008136988,0.0038676176,0.0067043747,0.019479476,0.0008859421,0.0032129472,0.0098840445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014215161,0.00089989393,0.00051672227,0.004259456,0.013492577,0.020137371,0.0050990563,0.0034935556,0.0012529363],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007321888,0.000027443388,0.0016749732,0.00014541675,0.000014316234,0.00028712256,0.19262561,0.00010808124,0.00078852504,0.7919213,0.0025387835,0.009795232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009586292,0.00008641063,0.0043785144,0.0005425803,0.000085572115,0.00049409125,0.19535233,0.0015694508,0.0011132517,0.6296391,0.16659729,0.000045535508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046995874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029559138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019479476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032271992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027680183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038125932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977132548","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2014.03.011","title":"Leaning and recipient intervening questions in Mandarin conversation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Conversation analysis; Psychology; Mandarin Chinese; Negotiation; Linguistics; Psychological intervention; Face negotiation theory; Face (sociological concept); Communication; Social psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.025633589356320884,"score_gpt":0.27386496567508106,"score_spread":0.2482313763187602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977132548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6152411,0.0006578088,0.24955663,0.0037643935,0.00029219236,0.00034638593,0.00013289116,0.00092704047,0.12908158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793362,0.000088405286,0.017087376,0.00017421346,0.000058574715,0.00007526588,0.00006896208,0.00019798042,0.0029130557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98425585,0.012353105,0.0005145522,0.000958326,0.0012484096,0.0006697785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9719772,0.023642654,0.0010869604,0.0012349272,0.0016279871,0.00043029842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01224624,0.00088386785,0.0007264453,0.0010330938,0.0032830236,0.0062513845,0.0016638538,0.0038186621,0.008237656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03812767,0.001008957,0.00048107043,0.00089297286,0.0043186657,0.012231178,0.0047112578,0.0034531562,0.0014282921],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019876582,0.00024773052,0.0052045835,0.0005269668,0.000062761,0.0015031944,0.25809446,0.001956137,0.05573741,0.5938598,0.0022892647,0.07853004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004898938,0.0014488222,0.013136983,0.0008762241,0.00046360758,0.0024549903,0.14453998,0.094546415,0.07625321,0.60445863,0.060971785,0.0003594823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001780604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012065454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01224624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014634179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001479814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064765036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977700075","doi":"10.1016/s0378-2166(99)00129-0","title":"Tough talk: Indirectness and gender in requests for information","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Politeness; Psychology; Attunement; Interview; Conversation; Social psychology; Power (physics); Linguistics; Communication; Sociology","score_opus":0.06441492989642562,"score_gpt":0.3170584595545581,"score_spread":0.25264352965813247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977700075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67264533,0.0011080239,0.033977877,0.00788077,0.00024609984,0.00015121418,0.0003675921,0.00025301267,0.2833701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99056214,0.00014059013,0.0023892801,0.0003331838,0.00010119203,0.00006572419,0.0000965396,0.00019048403,0.0061209043],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884969,0.0069949073,0.00052719424,0.0009958321,0.002182734,0.00080246845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9281448,0.060340397,0.0046441923,0.0025977625,0.0027708923,0.0015020265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0084869005,0.00061957876,0.0006094429,0.0015589063,0.0036290903,0.009418014,0.0012030195,0.0033322035,0.0177359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063788995,0.0010388572,0.0004093311,0.0010989095,0.0059746634,0.011155759,0.00632001,0.004190782,0.0015300121],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014862517,0.00020667815,0.026043162,0.00079323206,0.0000906941,0.0017337492,0.5882474,0.00041279665,0.024324633,0.30905747,0.004210737,0.043393154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035291197,0.0007445608,0.08082193,0.00137428,0.0004743622,0.0062742177,0.44729906,0.008190849,0.024121597,0.31720772,0.112704985,0.0004335182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013269932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011298083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0177359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012498712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012995036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05933249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000489864","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2008.11.002","title":"How do we know he is not talking about himself? Demonstrations in Science Classroom","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Conflation; Gesture; Focus (optics); Reflexive pronoun; Dialectic; Semiotics; Phenomenon; Cognitive science; Human body; Computer science; Psychology; Linguistics; Communication; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020287453834909285,"score_gpt":0.31398926966004015,"score_spread":0.2937018158251309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000489864","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97118294,0.00029448926,0.0036877852,0.0052855043,0.00018458269,0.000050688115,0.00007345176,0.00017328997,0.019067252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951605,0.00010208401,0.0020480847,0.0003040521,0.000021340606,0.00003950321,0.000036738333,0.000039856117,0.0022478553],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99381703,0.0040050303,0.0002532672,0.00063256506,0.0008264938,0.00046561824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9562944,0.03560937,0.0020247365,0.0016015884,0.0017742497,0.0026956392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041426835,0.00050320727,0.0007361991,0.00048915023,0.0033943437,0.0028073632,0.0011518021,0.0042782347,0.007651524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033210576,0.0005446697,0.0003731359,0.00029614085,0.004981355,0.004879137,0.003990752,0.00681407,0.001203212],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011928267,0.004418393,0.028374681,0.0009761944,0.00013457595,0.009019106,0.7669729,0.0021212564,0.04172269,0.07133518,0.02613515,0.047597144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009123658,0.0043961084,0.07279593,0.0011687936,0.00023664314,0.013252556,0.58397156,0.021372389,0.04083806,0.093573436,0.16683292,0.0006491623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035806105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036494965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007651524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012735995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014111155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025596917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007229764","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.005","title":"Acquisition of Relevance implicatures: A case against a Rationality-based account of conversational implicatures","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; McGill University","keywords":"Relevance (law); Rationality; Linguistics; Situated; Computer science; Relevance theory; Psychology; Cognitive science; Natural language processing; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Cognition; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011624290821160272,"score_gpt":0.3086297154305622,"score_spread":0.29700542460940194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007229764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50384,0.0013195013,0.25116238,0.046854183,0.00033409832,0.00017757963,0.00039976762,0.00100211,0.19491029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98523754,0.0001447069,0.011516582,0.0007019906,0.0000791825,0.000038069466,0.00006591177,0.00020071698,0.0020152812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851462,0.0067923013,0.00093627296,0.002261572,0.003748515,0.0011151882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93505484,0.04116313,0.004336657,0.012474889,0.0057096803,0.0012608103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017432738,0.0006049207,0.000684292,0.0014433285,0.0014924777,0.0051898067,0.0025503568,0.0042657345,0.0055305497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.065030076,0.0013648161,0.00082929956,0.00063293293,0.0125739975,0.018180212,0.0060974117,0.0075372434,0.0008708029],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029603328,0.00014932024,0.011144294,0.00030041652,0.00009048813,0.0016576066,0.056463283,0.0011502011,0.014103907,0.85462415,0.0028486394,0.05717167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012458155,0.00008633109,0.012271035,0.00018674922,0.00013704637,0.0027392826,0.010039905,0.010516749,0.011824225,0.9270247,0.02488134,0.00016802421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026483475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001831586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017432738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015960232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026018352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0921942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008398116","doi":"10.1016/s0378-2166(03)00051-1","title":"Evaluative metadiscursive comments and face-work in conversational discourse","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Psychology; Construct (python library); Face (sociological concept); Affect (linguistics); Linguistics; Conversation analysis; Discourse analysis; Social psychology; Communication; Computer science","score_opus":0.045749942190809766,"score_gpt":0.3229865131530607,"score_spread":0.27723657096225096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008398116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55277264,0.0009766939,0.21400885,0.013238197,0.0005944707,0.00037549908,0.00065535965,0.0010630605,0.21631528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829654,0.000083228646,0.009907886,0.00020228158,0.00014272422,0.00012914673,0.00012308892,0.00023346681,0.006212819],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9780725,0.017151289,0.00050956773,0.0012401658,0.0022998822,0.0007267044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8970175,0.08724184,0.0035441795,0.004398381,0.0066390242,0.0011590545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010768103,0.0007459,0.0005650567,0.0021617468,0.00637389,0.008076163,0.0016684541,0.0036532625,0.010230025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07616737,0.0007345529,0.0003387788,0.0017133149,0.0073994403,0.014737252,0.0064947247,0.003586038,0.0013515378],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00088979676,0.00016370682,0.0056539592,0.0006198213,0.00003183389,0.0011289449,0.57750547,0.0008039088,0.0104216905,0.34376502,0.0058305594,0.05318527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001670737,0.0003206518,0.0105843665,0.0009313999,0.000113969574,0.0016673125,0.4549188,0.030836733,0.02637075,0.3464582,0.1273874,0.00024332055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016808154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017595507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010768103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002541255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001462252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056947827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024002186","doi":"10.1016/s0378-2166(01)00060-1","title":"Repetitions as self-repair strategies in English and German conversations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":150,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"German; Linguistics; Demonstrative; Psychology; Verb; Repetition (rhetorical device); Pronoun; Computer science","score_opus":0.018830081132987463,"score_gpt":0.2890146241682085,"score_spread":0.27018454303522105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024002186","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96428144,0.0009475437,0.0052077444,0.00031079564,0.000021426295,0.00003556291,0.00008459261,0.0000934896,0.029017493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980829,0.000091020964,0.0007722919,0.000018469682,0.0000064576866,0.000013296084,0.000038592596,0.00003502654,0.00094204],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99482745,0.0031863677,0.00027240688,0.00055337884,0.0007163019,0.00044414122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97928154,0.01640722,0.0018328645,0.0008892083,0.0009908291,0.00059836294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031389405,0.00046480302,0.00043807022,0.0018299905,0.0017539664,0.006498122,0.0008682126,0.0020797926,0.003140045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018538238,0.00064023887,0.00030020048,0.001164758,0.0032137306,0.007247817,0.0022009623,0.0011637594,0.000375847],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013527459,0.00020195077,0.022475589,0.00052965,0.0000944645,0.0012980547,0.8168676,0.0013211917,0.026387786,0.08616429,0.0008128265,0.042493906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026780312,0.00080024544,0.1491368,0.0007356707,0.0005467566,0.0047923923,0.7087792,0.022600764,0.02433283,0.05757866,0.030030837,0.00039805303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005538888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044029215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006498122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00155959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011544478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01660055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052453443","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2012.08.003","title":"Joint attention helps explain why children omit new referents","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; British Academy; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Demonstrative; Psychology; Joint attention; Linguistics; Realisation; Noun; Perspective (graphical); Deixis; Cognitive psychology; Maxim; Ostensive definition; Developmental psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03622710532896149,"score_gpt":0.3013719151544145,"score_spread":0.265144809825453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052453443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8586325,0.001510412,0.052132208,0.0050974996,0.00056070066,0.00007269876,0.0006037011,0.0014541444,0.079936065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98382884,0.00023941499,0.009688895,0.00029444112,0.00006228395,0.000023637953,0.00022091436,0.0004313915,0.005210152],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996635,0.00055478147,0.0002403055,0.001010732,0.0011303815,0.00042878775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875306,0.0063399407,0.0018448203,0.0024334195,0.0014018134,0.00044939443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025196595,0.0009473189,0.0006619703,0.0011529404,0.0006667741,0.0030748537,0.0014564118,0.002368215,0.011355508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017464956,0.0011405983,0.0007260124,0.0006077703,0.0018400678,0.006347845,0.002811039,0.0025331276,0.0018377213],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00092228403,0.00048984843,0.23545499,0.0015169422,0.00044805845,0.017697444,0.04673212,0.0026297315,0.20777868,0.22946724,0.018675629,0.23818709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039739755,0.0008867375,0.42403045,0.0007997799,0.0012134865,0.032245044,0.025851065,0.027034516,0.12205001,0.28818622,0.07689815,0.0004071672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024307892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023190537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011355508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068343856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011733035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037988007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062868280","doi":"10.1016/s0378-2166(03)00117-6","title":"Pragmatic functions of local diaphonic repetitions in conversation","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Repetition (rhetorical device); Intonation (linguistics); Function (biology); Linguistics; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Speech act; Key (lock); Communication; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021361712980464593,"score_gpt":0.32733208748468123,"score_spread":0.30597037450421666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062868280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8776799,0.00069561007,0.030245395,0.00035927942,0.00006364033,0.00009796566,0.00018823503,0.0005078063,0.09016225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99607027,0.000053551266,0.0028158203,0.00002654661,0.000022853157,0.000026338164,0.000043745174,0.0001073524,0.0008337177],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859947,0.00065541756,0.00008822581,0.00026171174,0.00025167852,0.00014357643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951657,0.0032897939,0.00026671888,0.00049752346,0.0005231214,0.0002571332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014063496,0.0005112601,0.00046529534,0.0008294628,0.0010829619,0.0032848888,0.00050583517,0.00096610794,0.006468094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012103726,0.0006303041,0.00034062882,0.0003907236,0.0011487576,0.0033982769,0.0016443032,0.0009205956,0.00081476563],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037467543,0.00023846877,0.01852207,0.0011672006,0.00019845183,0.0023665102,0.07012952,0.0026648883,0.60442376,0.1567357,0.0015100652,0.13829657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009238869,0.002072714,0.44924986,0.000700659,0.0010235258,0.014435191,0.071211,0.084794685,0.095975645,0.25227472,0.026627058,0.0007110449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010938147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011026731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006468094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004964285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036309182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021637917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069733889","doi":"10.1016/s0378-2166(02)80012-1","title":"Ist Deutsch noch internationale Wissenschaftssprache? Englisch auch für die Lehre an den deutschsprachigen Hochschulen","year":2002,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Linguistic Education and Pedagogy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Psychology; Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.08390721047989252,"score_gpt":0.3387318760185297,"score_spread":0.2548246655386372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069733889","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030883482,0.04950836,0.009738005,0.5365604,0.005108745,0.00001696694,0.0001250716,0.00010531542,0.36795357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.888486,0.02217181,0.0050606974,0.0334304,0.0016857131,0.00006448879,0.00017011481,0.00020895843,0.048721705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99186313,0.0038555358,0.00053431396,0.0009300671,0.0013244087,0.0014925937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994759,0.0022324931,0.00059447676,0.00053232425,0.000817397,0.0010643009],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011092468,0.00047437742,0.0006818505,0.0018588434,0.007956679,0.022516036,0.0005775831,0.0064971,0.013412869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010246053,0.0004146069,0.0003556747,0.0029360363,0.016216407,0.02804645,0.00825806,0.008101049,0.0025670803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019446277,0.00001717017,0.00049332494,0.00005716042,0.000008820199,0.00014034138,0.006374475,0.000045714256,0.00015068386,0.96388763,0.013651583,0.015153829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014955828,0.000023629966,0.0021098112,0.00057338143,0.000029082712,0.0004233902,0.028352693,0.00018711545,0.0003995121,0.45557913,0.5122717,0.000035631256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058542993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006379776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.977484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046024583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008546338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05866331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086756136","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.011","title":"Centering and noun phrase realization in Kaqchikel Mayan","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Noun phrase; Realization (probability); Linguistics; Noun; Nominalization; Phrase; Determiner phrase; Psychology; Philosophy; Natural language processing; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.031286201890742535,"score_gpt":0.4635785005962958,"score_spread":0.43229229870555325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086756136","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3558221,0.0011041706,0.037864085,0.005786947,0.00022615085,0.00011882585,0.00031536337,0.00029316446,0.5984692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97849417,0.00013662453,0.0037387866,0.00012634908,0.000025065872,0.00002026892,0.000075470234,0.00005703924,0.017326143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882287,0.00052302633,0.00007437585,0.00017303362,0.00019048245,0.00021609307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885976,0.0004276853,0.000096559685,0.0001614617,0.00039450126,0.00006006349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018470144,0.00031009715,0.00047664647,0.00072813855,0.004870171,0.003255481,0.0007466734,0.000692746,0.009828074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002419828,0.0003751325,0.00029958863,0.0013001919,0.0038206086,0.00534921,0.0020492189,0.0019398513,0.0010610572],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000873509,0.000018922257,0.0005918871,0.00003476163,0.0000057914945,0.00018609109,0.012389461,0.00018359168,0.0010291632,0.9736989,0.0014671955,0.010306833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000103649,0.00011682034,0.00836618,0.0001159935,0.000099525714,0.00068046735,0.032174207,0.0093151545,0.0067667444,0.73782444,0.20425092,0.00018600679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021238767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03197176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021238767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040198523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003613159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042230308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102901208","doi":"10.1016/s0378-2166(02)00201-1","title":"The interrogation as a type of dialogue","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Interrogation; Argumentation theory; Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.029584423648084716,"score_gpt":0.2958388677965046,"score_spread":0.26625444414841987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102901208","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041046366,0.0012491932,0.52577156,0.012387963,0.0013588938,0.0003632133,0.00058318133,0.0011319666,0.41610765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82378757,0.00067036226,0.11963979,0.002487709,0.00086007366,0.00076740445,0.00043060054,0.0007065903,0.05064993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9811615,0.01405507,0.0006500204,0.0013743044,0.0021828874,0.0005762817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98105216,0.012464727,0.00087939546,0.0036428976,0.0014115741,0.000549306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006517326,0.0007134397,0.0008530676,0.0017808795,0.0032751628,0.010412628,0.0026497534,0.004893712,0.01445719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027588904,0.0010765715,0.00094577094,0.0024543726,0.011087182,0.020249935,0.0067324433,0.004420957,0.0026199615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077958546,0.00002573253,0.00025697108,0.00016338218,0.00002211418,0.00029364123,0.020398347,0.00023928138,0.0027983831,0.9632531,0.0032043855,0.009266663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009742047,0.000121661826,0.0006717738,0.00023632403,0.00009268979,0.0022765782,0.012481163,0.0077115274,0.0043021636,0.7973143,0.17456542,0.00012902115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006615464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004624852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01445719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000886515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009138388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048364162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106110953","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.013","title":"Editorials’ genre and media roles: Le Monde's editorials from 1999 to 2001","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Media studies; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.03843885235218079,"score_gpt":0.26005425121347847,"score_spread":0.2216153988612977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106110953","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17392778,0.22465299,0.00090972503,0.2517094,0.1684118,0.00010741591,0.005134344,0.00032355188,0.17482296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71984595,0.03784306,0.0010927848,0.016760401,0.098411225,0.000102114296,0.0017064638,0.00043547538,0.12380252],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.991958,0.0018733692,0.0008175259,0.00084906386,0.0035836883,0.0009182859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92008626,0.037698556,0.012806809,0.0013931913,0.020036096,0.007979124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008331605,0.00048627093,0.00046233708,0.011826961,0.0041990126,0.010383291,0.0010237191,0.0023415734,0.007666469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0764442,0.000380039,0.00039606553,0.008524758,0.0015853363,0.0032926572,0.0018738136,0.0025026225,0.0009783729],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085796777,0.00016327221,0.02059335,0.0018202575,0.00010853033,0.002062159,0.031085212,0.00020760909,0.0014930516,0.011393151,0.7907748,0.13944064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002260013,0.000025444784,0.036706828,0.0006445704,0.00002520342,0.00026078205,0.0054410687,0.00005304934,0.00043017877,0.00034857294,0.95602,0.000021733296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022158973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0594833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022158973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072569493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063530267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052653134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136892597","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2005.01.016","title":"Examination dialogue: An argumentation framework for critically questioning an expert opinion","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Expert opinion; Argumentative; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.03496806484847136,"score_gpt":0.34673711945314084,"score_spread":0.31176905460466947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136892597","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005727736,0.00022283106,0.9806285,0.0025676494,0.00014242555,0.0003316518,0.00011289083,0.00051445013,0.009751908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2870265,0.0001826205,0.70230657,0.00045634777,0.000116324016,0.0006784353,0.00028468433,0.00021287716,0.008735757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9840686,0.0132900495,0.00058180455,0.0006037499,0.0011514518,0.0003043591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9633461,0.030879926,0.0010433109,0.0015717187,0.002129209,0.0010297036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017578036,0.0009367151,0.00081766513,0.0019089028,0.0028840757,0.007946662,0.0030666078,0.0041466057,0.0109485425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047323257,0.00078707736,0.001393318,0.0010268351,0.0057280003,0.008376559,0.008199554,0.003469363,0.0011352521],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007565673,0.00019577214,0.0011076332,0.000818491,0.00011886133,0.0009291295,0.024625095,0.011606109,0.0043214206,0.80523854,0.013657386,0.13662508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027078248,0.00016836484,0.0007015589,0.00052504643,0.00020788536,0.00052906974,0.0049611935,0.14936535,0.0055004773,0.7119784,0.12560448,0.00018741605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002847535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003174641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017578036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016910818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00333503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09296262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161834173","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.013","title":"Slurring and common knowledge of ordinary language","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Utterance; Contempt; Linguistics; Sentence; Contradiction; Psychology; Meaning (existential); Competence (human resources); Emotive; Philosophy; Epistemology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03050663867209077,"score_gpt":0.2922494981573361,"score_spread":0.26174285948524534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161834173","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33946717,0.0030025176,0.38417077,0.023639677,0.00044480443,0.00014556694,0.00041068302,0.00041797588,0.24830079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824766,0.00024397779,0.014364809,0.00038812842,0.00014785699,0.000052598905,0.00009979291,0.00005314903,0.0021731479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98345816,0.008147475,0.0018502858,0.0028208483,0.0025224518,0.0012008447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9349055,0.042526044,0.002292555,0.014939645,0.0043282346,0.00100808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01455895,0.00043020406,0.00174914,0.0036919569,0.004483589,0.011027853,0.002538462,0.0039817896,0.005437075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055379905,0.00094479416,0.0013739621,0.0027058881,0.045614332,0.031725876,0.0093777785,0.0048880256,0.00046479993],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025106998,0.000011814732,0.0003283434,0.00003711749,0.000011535124,0.00009858196,0.0083093215,0.00029927955,0.00017142638,0.98617804,0.00030793188,0.004221422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007812157,0.000004802046,0.00012141463,0.00001809655,0.000007724354,0.00005217289,0.0012350018,0.00058804627,0.000114598195,0.99580234,0.0020372847,0.000010633291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004816189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002776327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01455895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028110165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003803365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07699603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167659325","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2013.09.003","title":"What language processing can tell us about perspective taking: A reply to Bezuidenhout (2013)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Conversation; Comprehension; Sentence processing; Representation (politics); Computer science; Sentence; Linguistics; Cognitive science; Psychology; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019258689494091406,"score_gpt":0.32969673993459686,"score_spread":0.31043805044050543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167659325","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011491403,0.012398051,0.0016151882,0.97939974,0.0026469473,0.0000036960635,0.0000686042,0.000020316469,0.0026982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09920894,0.019835925,0.003837515,0.84316677,0.028444747,0.00008772572,0.00014229176,0.00019032409,0.005085685],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959571,0.0015373774,0.00024252989,0.0010237225,0.000982946,0.00025633952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9448304,0.04407256,0.0017629655,0.0024590222,0.005615654,0.0012593898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0147370165,0.000981812,0.0024680404,0.0018568698,0.004998275,0.008484449,0.004535645,0.026481804,0.008380231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050593663,0.0008399028,0.0011799982,0.002949002,0.027825635,0.028055953,0.007864241,0.037013195,0.004631518],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031751086,0.00009068081,0.0016717849,0.0007287746,0.0001640812,0.0005592837,0.031301107,0.00034229908,0.00054693734,0.4381504,0.48525316,0.040874086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010614318,0.000024756335,0.0014567719,0.0009695206,0.00006395721,0.0006585795,0.009453607,0.00045696847,0.0005129607,0.7536621,0.23249397,0.00014061204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007585069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006791823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026481804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028684812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004052944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07793766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2573947339","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.009","title":"Loving a partner in a Foreign Language","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Feeling; Multiculturalism; Quarter (Canadian coin); Social psychology; Variety (cybernetics); Personality; Scale (ratio); Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.03411938343792474,"score_gpt":0.4481352301175898,"score_spread":0.41401584667966507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2573947339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94867665,0.00025882904,0.00087669224,0.0027665175,0.00018324378,0.000011291189,0.0000165781,0.000023585322,0.047186624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99624985,0.00006272276,0.00014648265,0.00033527843,0.00001071898,0.0000025617046,0.0000072629573,0.000010428242,0.0031745858],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980141,0.0012185815,0.000042469095,0.00013733309,0.00018655491,0.00040093085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955627,0.0016502339,0.0005877856,0.00019825425,0.00037944448,0.0016216626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023419745,0.00029994216,0.00042290357,0.00045882782,0.009111824,0.0061038216,0.000660932,0.0014695346,0.006678791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072459234,0.00023419209,0.00018925723,0.0003318207,0.0036717574,0.0032779411,0.004482997,0.0038547777,0.001012959],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002942348,0.00039068967,0.026304878,0.000086987086,0.000029670873,0.0065941717,0.921772,0.00010049499,0.0053066113,0.023243051,0.003283308,0.012593902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001848388,0.00014601962,0.008333686,0.000059720493,0.000021384027,0.0024009096,0.97206634,0.00032866435,0.0005081846,0.002933046,0.013142224,0.000041217216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061605168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009580818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009111824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014036702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016901345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022342801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766451116","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2017.10.011","title":"Multimodal artefacts and the texture of viewpoint","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Multimodality; Embodied cognition; Gesture; Linguistics; Multimodal interaction; Modalities; Texture (cosmology); Psychology; Metonymy; Relation (database); Field (mathematics); Frame (networking); Section (typography); Computer science; Metaphor; Cognitive science; Sociology; Human–computer interaction; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Image (mathematics)","score_opus":0.01980878843360596,"score_gpt":0.31831185071499024,"score_spread":0.2985030622813843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766451116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5878635,0.002653567,0.13150461,0.0053036776,0.0005694766,0.00006220621,0.0002789862,0.00038894365,0.27137506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905255,0.00021028638,0.0068503185,0.00007856262,0.000049793107,0.000014105503,0.00004035112,0.0001129887,0.0021180457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848723,0.00081746303,0.000050950865,0.00016254751,0.0003376482,0.00014404123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99471396,0.00319875,0.00048157052,0.0009071274,0.00039082635,0.00030771637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015243341,0.00034883,0.00036879827,0.0013434016,0.0015223722,0.007796768,0.00071499054,0.0013611724,0.008918037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016134446,0.0005169755,0.00044930412,0.001101492,0.006434934,0.007444514,0.003500849,0.001592496,0.00057477655],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051684136,0.00003428592,0.0052307392,0.00033102426,0.00005589312,0.0010498568,0.0777806,0.0012852156,0.024005754,0.84007215,0.0027859546,0.046851758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027555745,0.00037202475,0.03206603,0.00045676026,0.00019585041,0.0024309086,0.05650677,0.009661974,0.0054189744,0.8180083,0.074396886,0.00020992177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011840228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012236725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008918037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006624499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000660018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029833853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894927725","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2018.09.006","title":"Tag-naxon? (Tag-Right?) in instructional talk: Opening or blocking learning opportunities","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Blocking (statistics); Psychology; Computer science; Computer network","score_opus":0.11555797606653302,"score_gpt":0.32496162861631545,"score_spread":0.20940365254978244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894927725","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16483377,0.0009287407,0.12917672,0.016061613,0.0031554485,0.0002329397,0.00045649763,0.0054211398,0.67973316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8828126,0.0003476861,0.035942253,0.0026846686,0.00040790322,0.00040192716,0.00029351743,0.002318209,0.07479125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961157,0.0022238276,0.00021558035,0.00044697052,0.00058112794,0.00041683315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867498,0.008506678,0.0007263792,0.0017094237,0.001105123,0.0012025646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005461144,0.0004908997,0.00051457854,0.0005271587,0.0024400346,0.0044725416,0.0011008516,0.003078083,0.044623867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018435037,0.00054863584,0.00035678403,0.00028786832,0.0032994181,0.01159605,0.006187859,0.003234421,0.016904205],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032217526,0.00047231742,0.008832563,0.0008345584,0.000033442033,0.00068115676,0.074543305,0.0004165929,0.027307892,0.584828,0.058878668,0.23994975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030532392,0.00078514835,0.007534276,0.0013200482,0.00016338541,0.0012301691,0.050672356,0.010540267,0.038998883,0.19388302,0.6943305,0.00023662465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008427636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010459212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044623867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071228645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001357316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14928174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946148733","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.005","title":"Sarcasm between siblings: Children's use of relationship information in processing ironic remarks","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sarcasm; Psychology; Irony; Comprehension; Object (grammar); Attribution; Gaze; Literal and figurative language; Sibling; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Social psychology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.026126080266356638,"score_gpt":0.301005433896603,"score_spread":0.27487935363024635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946148733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996086,0.000058314,0.00036343202,0.00019178497,0.000011467737,0.000013553957,0.000054143235,0.000022780732,0.0031984914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99766195,0.00007832088,0.0010869601,0.00008472522,0.0000052410956,0.000019210664,0.00011561022,0.000023426144,0.00092451175],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984434,0.00038892066,0.00009690598,0.00024753172,0.0006630119,0.0001602498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98412466,0.008320431,0.0046321196,0.00091654237,0.0011981375,0.000808057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00222069,0.00039421805,0.00033026544,0.00074109866,0.0006854335,0.0019666764,0.0006160552,0.001448332,0.0046948167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02999268,0.0007592895,0.00028920855,0.0003856518,0.0013110489,0.00205057,0.0011744373,0.002052993,0.0005190542],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062097586,0.0008774689,0.58196485,0.0003784864,0.000108109816,0.013200522,0.2813647,0.00048168213,0.07539754,0.00451479,0.0032160378,0.037874866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007745601,0.00038767548,0.87684345,0.00023815758,0.00014805136,0.010675462,0.091888756,0.0018396178,0.009308317,0.003790905,0.0046963817,0.00010581329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052456674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069842003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052456674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055100245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090717454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015705764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966614013","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.002","title":"Figurative language development/acquisition research: Status and ways forward","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Literal and figurative language; Psychology; Set (abstract data type); Metaphor; Embodied cognition; Cognitive science; Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Psycholinguistics; Language development; Reading (process); Cognition; Computer science; Developmental psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04988368206069906,"score_gpt":0.3618918004989025,"score_spread":0.3120081184382035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966614013","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032020494,0.7843098,0.007499511,0.14040402,0.0021333264,0.00007079156,0.0002183826,0.00011855457,0.03322521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32351434,0.6325013,0.01894623,0.014393235,0.0049518324,0.00025704593,0.00030853483,0.00013802691,0.0049894964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99409676,0.0027298578,0.0006077263,0.0011735621,0.00084763416,0.0005444185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89945436,0.08012888,0.0045651444,0.0053701103,0.007589964,0.0028914702],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042716768,0.0012933915,0.003678895,0.005719411,0.003914069,0.02092509,0.0049472065,0.009499221,0.015341855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03103901,0.0010820106,0.0009784548,0.005758747,0.037646856,0.04380326,0.00868248,0.008856852,0.0017813982],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008362761,0.0009397973,0.01096054,0.0074132327,0.00020992963,0.0005151384,0.011021393,0.00025771034,0.0023471655,0.5029047,0.007613872,0.4549802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020725974,0.0007896146,0.016791211,0.015942672,0.00032231977,0.001299404,0.03702069,0.0013292864,0.0030663447,0.76579064,0.15711507,0.0003254465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006078479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008691695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95728326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004205917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013668853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2259106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999549733","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2019.11.002","title":"Metaphor and what is meant: Metaphorical content, what is said, and contextualism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Grice; Metaphor; Contextualism; Content (measure theory); Epistemology; Linguistics; Pragmatics; Psychology; Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Mathematics","score_opus":0.06092749645764313,"score_gpt":0.3133544094078879,"score_spread":0.2524269129502448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999549733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45398456,0.027683351,0.10864997,0.049926203,0.0013476313,0.00012128232,0.00038504865,0.00022046966,0.35768145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924165,0.0009406212,0.00531596,0.0004526497,0.00010571422,0.000032111246,0.000037857302,0.000042168238,0.00065639743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99604934,0.002685295,0.00016537117,0.00038467697,0.00049058214,0.0002246696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914725,0.0063687423,0.0006767811,0.000541836,0.0005282653,0.00041176513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041661435,0.00044555363,0.00075370393,0.0020785667,0.0024620395,0.009511532,0.0010709898,0.0026396988,0.00445941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015854912,0.00055526395,0.0006067363,0.0023463548,0.020720396,0.015853513,0.003618067,0.0034019933,0.0003260675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012961228,0.00007101184,0.0014045544,0.0002883829,0.000035769335,0.000261074,0.045379393,0.00023120543,0.0012459562,0.9391981,0.0011230531,0.010631981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000592803,0.000045530094,0.0030257185,0.00030668708,0.000059789534,0.0005144857,0.026277455,0.0013404251,0.00049845735,0.95361,0.014209192,0.000052810396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017203784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013630677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009511532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016623908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019562067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022032917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088331110","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.003","title":"Up north there: Discourse-pragmatic deixis in Northern Ontario","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Linguistic Variation and Morphology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Deixis; Locative case; Linguistics; Value (mathematics); French; Pragmatics; Sociology; Geography; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03333601547341808,"score_gpt":0.3141568156044611,"score_spread":0.28082080013104305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088331110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91109407,0.0005056362,0.0006490658,0.002447996,0.00004051083,0.00004440906,0.0003840094,0.000032597032,0.084801614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858984,0.00015984921,0.00030799434,0.000085593194,0.0000043600708,0.000015652522,0.00006932103,0.000033662964,0.01342529],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857974,0.00032311425,0.00007028323,0.00025863713,0.00030275225,0.0004656072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969453,0.0009989571,0.0004398804,0.00021700651,0.00095521857,0.00044358708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013381457,0.00028054297,0.00050862704,0.00095699984,0.011737341,0.004285658,0.00082387857,0.0007137981,0.0062217405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004692999,0.00033737082,0.00018871052,0.002512105,0.004575078,0.0017117171,0.0033683057,0.0014461942,0.00032148714],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021064527,0.000028983659,0.033728357,0.00015258402,0.000024556017,0.0015183667,0.9044143,0.00019385778,0.0043996675,0.030411094,0.0037018845,0.021215804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017002709,0.0000262579,0.18356416,0.00013146065,0.000035216057,0.00044107795,0.70930296,0.00037951308,0.0010409236,0.0029514825,0.10204691,0.000062977655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9745567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9936952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045615245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045615245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041579947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3309633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184137896","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2021.06.019","title":"Logical Form – Not logical enough for logic, not linguistic enough for linguistics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Sentence; Generative grammar; Utterance; Logical form; Computer science; Atomic sentence; Logical consequence; Representation (politics); Philosophy","score_opus":0.04775607042432032,"score_gpt":0.33888393546512746,"score_spread":0.2911278650408071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184137896","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032976776,0.0120248785,0.49503654,0.24238884,0.009196655,0.00015056557,0.0009919509,0.0012618607,0.20597199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7706782,0.0037861185,0.16416436,0.026761424,0.0062792366,0.00031458316,0.0008604709,0.0013601336,0.025795462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99087924,0.004098753,0.0010168732,0.001693194,0.0018758775,0.00043604168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97965425,0.010008675,0.0011654078,0.00446673,0.0037921665,0.00091272965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009250669,0.0008377084,0.0016933993,0.0018133009,0.0038247358,0.008215865,0.0019869846,0.0048988573,0.009513738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027593356,0.001354045,0.0013024532,0.0011125538,0.023399329,0.038329177,0.004878884,0.008458427,0.004226802],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031255746,0.000017159105,0.0002419666,0.0001221839,0.000015935579,0.000056805842,0.0005320068,0.000092738075,0.0003868196,0.9849406,0.0066469503,0.0069156215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000112019525,0.0000087209455,0.00006563198,0.000039804545,0.000009571821,0.00012291264,0.0002057693,0.000320116,0.0002247817,0.9849128,0.014068513,0.000010193486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010463798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00072701735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009513738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018684337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002486939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048922837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210794128","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2021.09.007","title":"Book review","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016528347661243826,"score_gpt":0.3107019587252859,"score_spread":0.29417361106404205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210794128","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040800092,0.06481502,0.0013346247,0.056853663,0.06684667,0.000118065574,0.0010102243,0.0006333601,0.80798036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013484824,0.011831107,0.00034651978,0.0061496017,0.0070058927,0.00003368704,0.00035443497,0.00014969312,0.9727806],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914265,0.00009114733,0.000024031066,0.000082860104,0.00059080066,0.00006851757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972632,0.00045027697,0.00010943227,0.00021160879,0.0014873742,0.0004781004],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089031964,0.0005581199,0.00072937855,0.0029872835,0.0013757318,0.0039530126,0.0010595003,0.0023364439,0.36900908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049881544,0.00034922082,0.00043202838,0.002777971,0.0008479975,0.0023321852,0.0013415879,0.002713051,0.29270065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035235178,0.000004878111,0.000015419313,0.00004274557,9.216345e-7,0.0000132654195,0.000007890344,0.00001294717,0.000031928328,0.0016891505,0.96784467,0.030332709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018211277,0.0000024174067,0.00005519841,0.000053767897,0.0000010170478,0.000027872267,0.000011369844,0.000010489195,0.000015573552,0.0006707614,0.99914825,0.0000015580958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045560664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012735382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6309909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021362405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003543475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.900032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317933678","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2023.01.007","title":"Socio-pragmatic variation in request refusals in Cameroon French","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Formality; Pragmatics; Variation (astronomy); Sociocultural evolution; Linguistics; Realisation; Relation (database); Psychology; Sociolinguistics; Contextualization; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; Anthropology","score_opus":0.042930986496901705,"score_gpt":0.3139261259824292,"score_spread":0.2709951394855275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317933678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872264,0.00039486127,0.0007651076,0.0009901553,0.000019265926,0.000032458694,0.00012647448,0.000018459765,0.01042676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992011,0.000045416513,0.00016707268,0.00005335382,0.0000037096395,0.0000092993005,0.00002206042,0.0000095706955,0.0004884076],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894265,0.0076996805,0.00031636166,0.00074766914,0.0007254703,0.0010843715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96454084,0.027167268,0.0026127242,0.0007878927,0.004248079,0.00064307946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009242998,0.00029561477,0.00031653952,0.0021142643,0.0025661732,0.0035298397,0.0005058829,0.0011866671,0.0060313176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03775813,0.00032599975,0.00015232252,0.0020988411,0.0029058906,0.0018048151,0.001344836,0.0011523191,0.00043981214],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001376529,0.00025282096,0.22670877,0.00034206267,0.00009977944,0.004593027,0.6412408,0.0017392786,0.012643739,0.045492537,0.00407528,0.06143539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009715875,0.0002289184,0.60047144,0.0003144031,0.000085486085,0.0020532026,0.32694578,0.0047169984,0.0029813966,0.005784344,0.056075633,0.0002450895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10555563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00886299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003688706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32102048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320401858","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2023.01.011","title":"Book review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Demonstrative; Linguistics; Epistemology; Intuition; Philosophy of language; Stalemate; Philosophy of mind; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Cognitive science; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.03596340550001283,"score_gpt":0.28205546428245093,"score_spread":0.24609205878243812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320401858","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00041878232,0.19211759,0.0022398632,0.06843237,0.1085367,0.00013385559,0.0021044237,0.00078009994,0.62523633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017003601,0.060216263,0.0008765614,0.015867595,0.019249827,0.00005911172,0.0011722166,0.000249837,0.9006082],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993136,0.00006634224,0.000028710565,0.00008921316,0.00043714492,0.00006496197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971186,0.00047259076,0.00011851377,0.00017486393,0.0015736327,0.0005417561],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008391636,0.0004600087,0.0006543978,0.0025789114,0.0008148743,0.0038895444,0.0012793916,0.0019747976,0.3276504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052753254,0.00026875868,0.00035180702,0.0026102779,0.0005755051,0.0024279982,0.0013802995,0.0023483704,0.30023143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004313253,0.000004822803,0.000018465475,0.00008687551,0.0000012958717,0.000015639076,0.000009233349,0.000014836549,0.000041981857,0.0018520225,0.94521743,0.05273311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012680622,0.0000016848094,0.00003735962,0.00007739978,9.3306676e-7,0.00003154203,0.000008026087,0.0000049245778,0.0000115224575,0.00038125494,0.99944276,0.0000012751638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002397766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006395786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3276504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012637284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025490206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9590251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376881511","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2023.05.001","title":"Book review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Interrogative; Utterance; Conversation; Sentence; Linguistics; Position (finance); Psychology; Expression (computer science); Conversation analysis; Turn-taking; Computer science; Philosophy; Business; Programming language","score_opus":0.050878492126818706,"score_gpt":0.3283859582954197,"score_spread":0.277507466168601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376881511","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036180366,0.24182156,0.0016123089,0.054392677,0.08800363,0.00015975077,0.0018189576,0.0006230391,0.6112062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016700876,0.08924741,0.0007620281,0.014613383,0.017234951,0.0000768126,0.0011516793,0.00020196529,0.8750418],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992085,0.00008150169,0.000031082884,0.00008403519,0.00052290753,0.00007197213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99695957,0.0005179507,0.00013985521,0.00017403322,0.001694523,0.0005141144],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087538763,0.00046553422,0.00068287377,0.0029604002,0.00079593126,0.0038486577,0.001364735,0.00201565,0.32406354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055316566,0.0002833631,0.0003534214,0.00325253,0.00059241796,0.002203569,0.0013760902,0.0022801245,0.27918336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044501885,0.000005568165,0.000017794167,0.00012771934,0.0000014239725,0.000017219778,0.000009757151,0.000015530164,0.000042562984,0.0013952239,0.94436157,0.05400123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014662924,0.0000019292422,0.000037454607,0.00010884336,0.0000010883848,0.00003368127,0.000008572099,0.000004113982,0.000010889802,0.00028167918,0.9995091,0.0000011915109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030569604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008030501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32406354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014495048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031248487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9641413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381804677","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2023.05.012","title":"Small talk across Englishes: A focus on Namibia","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Linguistic Variation and Morphology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"German; Varieties of English; Pragmatics; Linguistics; Irish; English language; Variety (cybernetics); Focus (optics); World Englishes; Sociology; American English; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.056224518846979946,"score_gpt":0.3553825334995373,"score_spread":0.29915801465255737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381804677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98120993,0.0012996587,0.00027045707,0.00034046007,0.000012658157,0.000014685862,0.00005862033,0.0000026068676,0.016790994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99801,0.0006234338,0.00013749384,0.000061937,0.0000063366283,0.000014960933,0.000026629525,0.000005377611,0.001113825],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996438,0.00014891409,0.000013088932,0.000049491424,0.00002580978,0.00011882025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972314,0.00014671774,0.000050103958,0.000011605015,0.000030390138,0.000038052687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044756834,0.00038295376,0.00042567108,0.0009355569,0.0045044716,0.0016660454,0.00032074717,0.00045568173,0.0034980958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00084816484,0.0001823501,0.00014601676,0.0017189959,0.0017912426,0.0017319584,0.0018772412,0.0005699337,0.0002350056],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033328554,0.00006233286,0.033611976,0.0005377856,0.000022665727,0.0044137836,0.89834183,0.00005509518,0.019223183,0.009218716,0.00037236646,0.033806957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008494437,0.00008798655,0.14294845,0.00031211082,0.00003071836,0.0022734248,0.8285611,0.000103850114,0.0019531338,0.0007481021,0.022948248,0.000024419262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04958282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12623832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04958282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026219808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010835025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09858841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408392965","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.02.007","title":"How to investigate implicit pragmatic phenomena in corpora","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Szegedi Tudományegyetem; Mount Allison University; Magyar Tudományos Akadémia","keywords":"Psychology; Linguistics; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01963106529511746,"score_gpt":0.30264805749367846,"score_spread":0.283016992198561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408392965","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030757701,0.006268182,0.8861449,0.009634131,0.0021376514,0.0057514524,0.018599642,0.0043675886,0.036338717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08042984,0.0025060533,0.88140184,0.0010767054,0.0005809811,0.010293305,0.017287536,0.0019943865,0.0044293804],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9277541,0.04062192,0.009381892,0.008616549,0.012714243,0.00091124786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79127437,0.1264815,0.007745878,0.048823055,0.024056861,0.0016183519],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04434749,0.0010266257,0.0021370326,0.009861964,0.005409999,0.01312405,0.003737268,0.003147816,0.012836818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18910523,0.0025090708,0.0015707496,0.014725839,0.0062410044,0.021610374,0.0070649823,0.0044342997,0.006298831],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039453586,0.0004326976,0.010595784,0.011738537,0.00051010743,0.002732316,0.04305011,0.00339404,0.026838366,0.29819214,0.07741627,0.5247051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030956304,0.00016975253,0.01120246,0.005424228,0.0003694546,0.0019399193,0.01720606,0.011213341,0.021230504,0.22043775,0.71013737,0.00035953752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023399887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002184627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04434749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022005327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061337417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2345348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410033196","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.04.006","title":"The effect of online methods on epistemic inference and scalar implicature","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Implicature; Inference; Scalar (mathematics); Epistemology; Psychology; Pragmatics; Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.018854571537288662,"score_gpt":0.4612427903061239,"score_spread":0.4423882187688353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410033196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9572425,0.00128522,0.02884544,0.00084655656,0.00010678198,0.00026638136,0.00018534412,0.0004465147,0.010775202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97294444,0.00032016487,0.025025733,0.00023553528,0.00007440241,0.00026813993,0.000107915745,0.00018510928,0.00083873555],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.961267,0.027559346,0.0027420803,0.0034098416,0.0042345207,0.0007872001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.42988965,0.5101177,0.026571061,0.026159788,0.0050451197,0.0022166846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028344657,0.00094767497,0.0006541353,0.00091809384,0.0005823297,0.0032223954,0.0013754868,0.0021420983,0.007027853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2635329,0.0009804051,0.0009775851,0.00046143122,0.0029341662,0.009231822,0.004592222,0.002445296,0.0006306785],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.030230694,0.0056180465,0.16974635,0.0049953936,0.0014357961,0.0012561968,0.028985906,0.0052500763,0.16545099,0.012261768,0.001332505,0.5734363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020856683,0.026927255,0.6112109,0.002890133,0.0023266799,0.00471533,0.01137872,0.036534492,0.19678064,0.07813047,0.026128685,0.0008910591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005788104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042475056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028344657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006984893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005738091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1499027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413246018","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.07.013","title":"Putting negotiation on a ‘principal-ed’ footing: A corpus-informed discourse analysis of person deixis in diplomatic debates","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Deixis; Negotiation; Principal (computer security); Linguistics; Discourse analysis; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.03805956976609867,"score_gpt":0.3377791611832958,"score_spread":0.2997195914171972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413246018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9107772,0.0022243033,0.02361213,0.002398745,0.00015635048,0.0002929227,0.0014004586,0.000104630235,0.05903313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830331,0.00066662184,0.01117043,0.00013998323,0.000031599222,0.00024804162,0.00092628546,0.00011033548,0.003673536],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.994766,0.0037743622,0.00018659225,0.00043697958,0.0005631203,0.00027293715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846368,0.013313503,0.00063893385,0.0005984226,0.00062875455,0.0001836341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062901257,0.0004076726,0.00047584777,0.0051402645,0.0054411995,0.007206696,0.0011154701,0.0013436717,0.0030224132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014733713,0.00046810802,0.0002870281,0.0072291936,0.008128425,0.007759986,0.0042490717,0.0023744025,0.000320142],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018932977,0.000057674348,0.0050878758,0.00031260005,0.000017420723,0.000715776,0.89280194,0.00046591536,0.004097403,0.06466089,0.0015751037,0.030018086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043936026,0.000054814074,0.02039291,0.00080631126,0.000038413928,0.0005529277,0.8076944,0.0050926404,0.00688212,0.026124228,0.13223903,0.000078341094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014766901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021483298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014766901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053030895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002364732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038476765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414272901","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.08.010","title":"Negotiating truth and relevance: A new typology of English rising declaratives","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia Graduate School; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Negotiation; Typology; Politeness; Relation (database); Relevance (law); Evidentiality; Variation (astronomy); Narrative; Relevance theory","score_opus":0.02256017017833487,"score_gpt":0.2723912746338605,"score_spread":0.24983110445552562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414272901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5545884,0.0021064596,0.23019975,0.0036641334,0.00019406283,0.00030129045,0.00039310186,0.0003845943,0.20816818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98160917,0.00024093669,0.0133510465,0.00021970659,0.000065029184,0.000084429426,0.00012161523,0.00012606826,0.0041820374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99500966,0.0029120953,0.00032097494,0.0005347655,0.00085388595,0.00036865365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917664,0.005041922,0.00086322986,0.0011293476,0.0009075446,0.000291704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046728784,0.00047089352,0.00045889584,0.0019312734,0.0028645901,0.0061270073,0.0013402113,0.0011222974,0.0027836096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009710448,0.00048594427,0.0005283925,0.0014420658,0.0076309284,0.01058215,0.005014534,0.0030073654,0.0004652891],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081561535,0.00003355173,0.0068356716,0.00014913252,0.000016458209,0.00097110297,0.35250404,0.00036082396,0.0059319325,0.61274546,0.0007848423,0.019585362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009533935,0.00031445714,0.02603585,0.0005979208,0.00013384502,0.006573006,0.2492205,0.015107343,0.008309061,0.39290115,0.30046663,0.00024487704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027529188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024058565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061270073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015928298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010741522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02471286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414714768","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.09.006","title":"Toward a granular analysis of the discourse marker ti: in Tunisian Arabic","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Situated; Discourse analysis; Meaning (existential); Arabic; Relevance (law); Discourse marker","score_opus":0.022449762857013004,"score_gpt":0.34544403206961993,"score_spread":0.32299426921260693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414714768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7102192,0.0022790963,0.22849128,0.0035918325,0.00029531284,0.00082365086,0.0051859478,0.001891938,0.047221698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9282583,0.00028336814,0.06672368,0.00010652564,0.000048981587,0.00018268387,0.001071039,0.00020395298,0.0031215204],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905163,0.0004047536,0.00010729978,0.00019751793,0.00015071435,0.000088106215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99669504,0.001427632,0.0005425858,0.00027248755,0.00090834824,0.00015390337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016459118,0.0005275659,0.00035898056,0.0049890066,0.0019296566,0.0048546474,0.00060446735,0.0007354152,0.0038851537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005935468,0.00028509606,0.0002639868,0.0035256927,0.0017314539,0.0038142838,0.0028574048,0.0009774584,0.0009608645],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014268671,0.00019207693,0.04891034,0.0019850985,0.00013993851,0.0020424118,0.20322591,0.003408124,0.12710342,0.2056003,0.0109452475,0.39502037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010485497,0.00038476,0.15094781,0.001842508,0.0003876293,0.0017743382,0.32659677,0.088977076,0.05835362,0.11506128,0.25530005,0.00026933954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01628638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014873189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01628638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018897903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002262232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032383144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416527252","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.10.008","title":"Responding to new information with negative discourse particles nein/nee/nö in German talk-in-interaction","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Conversation; German; Embodied cognition; Function (biology); Conversation analysis","score_opus":0.023906243234995808,"score_gpt":0.34267606403379225,"score_spread":0.31876982079879645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416527252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95619404,0.00030222692,0.0127877975,0.00087763154,0.00007076601,0.000026151856,0.000058318437,0.000093883216,0.029589137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99736446,0.000050656447,0.0009321528,0.0000669552,0.0000089621135,0.000011465385,0.00002893687,0.00003030566,0.0015060289],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99593866,0.002939818,0.000114017545,0.00029132343,0.0004530474,0.0002631627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99626094,0.0028132654,0.00039261574,0.00019045339,0.00017464905,0.00016800368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024143057,0.00054571155,0.00030347583,0.00075855583,0.0025712275,0.0031229223,0.0004763692,0.0011049481,0.0017105354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005516165,0.0003181157,0.00019514908,0.00048836216,0.0063851643,0.0047669695,0.003054513,0.0014704795,0.00040767144],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047182234,0.00006843094,0.00844319,0.00033580157,0.000041561114,0.0019585593,0.8250382,0.0008550898,0.04936665,0.090886064,0.0014859561,0.021048695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008394328,0.0003939642,0.02929095,0.00027543886,0.00013147673,0.0024470112,0.7634033,0.008312514,0.031212512,0.032768223,0.13144177,0.00023892152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017431182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027503634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031229223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001612196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043117238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012768209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}