{"meta":{"query_hash":"de68fc462177","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Pragmatics"},"cohort_total":35,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":35,"exported":35,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/de68fc462177","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Pragmatics"},"results":[{"id":"W1971196298","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2009.04.009","title":"Subjects and topics in conversation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Utterance; Subject (documents); Conversation; Pronoun; Subject pronoun; Linguistics; Casual; Expression (computer science); Realization (probability); Conversation analysis; Psychology; Personal pronoun; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.029841164348793015,"score_gpt":0.2813031788552792,"score_spread":0.2514620145064862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971196298","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94674444,0.0007553257,0.00011111996,0.0064239586,0.00018765694,0.000068198955,0.0000012466737,0.000008272995,0.045699768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99818856,0.00012491897,0.0009292623,0.00023442936,0.00017931258,2.0105598e-7,6.962801e-7,0.000002444835,0.00034016426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995166,0.000042277996,0.00025392722,0.000024558822,0.0001064468,0.000056208122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954367,0.000054016404,0.00020779841,0.00008448084,0.000088543995,0.00002150457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023272251,0.000043746448,0.00010466713,0.000079873076,0.00003480306,0.000104766645,0.000086712476,0.000018216766,0.000093720504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000064230044,0.00003386632,0.000019521924,0.000018590714,0.0000494867,0.00029713774,0.0000081992,0.0001167098,0.0000024695375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020023885,0.00013321309,0.00094565644,0.00003919972,0.000022432047,0.000023485461,0.19956197,0.00004168151,0.000105613275,0.78564435,0.0019011481,0.011561247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005151873,0.0013742417,0.064237736,0.0007486924,0.00019165402,0.00024273638,0.37955844,0.002074019,0.0006969813,0.40062514,0.14437337,0.0007250873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008338139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014163458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38501918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001823677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035372093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13810284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977132548","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2014.03.011","title":"Leaning and recipient intervening questions in Mandarin conversation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Conversation analysis; Psychology; Mandarin Chinese; Negotiation; Linguistics; Psychological intervention; Face negotiation theory; Face (sociological concept); Communication; Social psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.025633589356320884,"score_gpt":0.27386496567508106,"score_spread":0.2482313763187602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977132548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9537035,0.00044712488,0.0072847097,0.0023576492,0.00042859963,0.000086376385,0.0000022085308,0.000017130478,0.03567268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966312,0.000040982475,0.0028910632,0.000061541214,0.00013724335,9.810801e-7,0.0000011741906,0.000005832811,0.00022999806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992995,0.00011732943,0.00036686147,0.000035495068,0.000115424264,0.00006534768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992741,0.00015699462,0.00033023118,0.00009750625,0.0001147683,0.000026406042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007462499,0.000053151747,0.0001251168,0.00012416448,0.00007636903,0.00017199514,0.00010080444,0.000018052111,0.00011748554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021137462,0.000043050168,0.000027858721,0.00001983778,0.000086823806,0.00032925574,0.00003212029,0.00017766265,0.0000037234754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017800889,0.00008260706,0.0021073918,0.000075817676,0.00003824577,0.0000052395535,0.2174616,0.0002855339,0.00009156415,0.7673907,0.00073079433,0.011712676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005574425,0.0013227889,0.022471117,0.004574872,0.00031583177,0.00028613486,0.57082695,0.029844554,0.00038896943,0.16700621,0.19649024,0.00089792267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004181403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005602607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60038453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003277578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024331657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17555349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977700075","doi":"10.1016/s0378-2166(99)00129-0","title":"Tough talk: Indirectness and gender in requests for information","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Politeness; Psychology; Attunement; Interview; Conversation; Social psychology; Power (physics); Linguistics; Communication; Sociology","score_opus":0.06441492989642562,"score_gpt":0.3170584595545581,"score_spread":0.25264352965813247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977700075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9039374,0.0007827204,0.0020720884,0.0014185036,0.00038668662,0.00028643906,0.000013919479,0.000019590669,0.09108268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99642426,0.00021358706,0.0026790467,0.00019681368,0.00017024296,0.0000052315618,0.000005626388,0.000006187294,0.00029900545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992778,0.000039910377,0.00043361244,0.000025094754,0.00013367069,0.00008993136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991448,0.00012897387,0.00038242608,0.00010487177,0.00021088452,0.000028024138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045215027,0.000063672815,0.0001387001,0.00014817152,0.000072224284,0.00021037582,0.00012490858,0.000029050614,0.00010118183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013346157,0.000048987124,0.00003051407,0.000031966567,0.000061343024,0.0012807578,0.000020381773,0.0001153544,0.0000034591928],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000993209,0.00017581305,0.0012077488,0.0003294275,0.00009740919,0.000019145566,0.34829012,0.00019876948,0.00004148085,0.62492746,0.0074674827,0.017145842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003317559,0.00032494334,0.005666778,0.00033318345,0.00012783728,0.00039564056,0.14193672,0.0015315289,0.00012595078,0.20124555,0.644544,0.0004502991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014957098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022621753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63707656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027274269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052047395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20286588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000489864","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2008.11.002","title":"How do we know he is not talking about himself? Demonstrations in Science Classroom","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Conflation; Gesture; Focus (optics); Reflexive pronoun; Dialectic; Semiotics; Phenomenon; Cognitive science; Human body; Computer science; Psychology; Linguistics; Communication; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020287453834909285,"score_gpt":0.31398926966004015,"score_spread":0.2937018158251309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000489864","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90910304,0.0072186873,0.030310899,0.026842281,0.0019504656,0.00034266931,0.000016150829,0.000037448157,0.024178337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98760515,0.0004496383,0.010149014,0.0007354695,0.0003041015,0.0000018243798,6.0868035e-7,0.000008646076,0.0007455419],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984637,0.00010612175,0.00052632054,0.00014068685,0.00047994623,0.00028324954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877053,0.00011543088,0.0005288368,0.00020898633,0.00026683565,0.00010938196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010188548,0.00012112833,0.00023418928,0.00040688209,0.00012877332,0.00023487314,0.00030588813,0.000099846184,0.00019534925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002775725,0.000098563534,0.00010121674,0.000585613,0.000112919406,0.00052453426,0.000014534383,0.00042307007,0.000029734543],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011071388,0.0011436327,0.002823239,0.000053066073,0.00012815214,0.00041700868,0.037228487,0.000037171547,0.0289941,0.043225426,0.010439901,0.8753991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016238583,0.004871013,0.2924924,0.005159536,0.0015521037,0.0076011983,0.116970494,0.0051360037,0.036997285,0.36535957,0.14463778,0.0029840092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000033722017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001758128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87241507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007738044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016146204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40193042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007229764","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.005","title":"Acquisition of Relevance implicatures: A case against a Rationality-based account of conversational implicatures","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; McGill University","keywords":"Relevance (law); Rationality; Linguistics; Situated; Computer science; Relevance theory; Psychology; Cognitive science; Natural language processing; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Cognition; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011624290821160272,"score_gpt":0.3086297154305622,"score_spread":0.29700542460940194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007229764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945849,0.00014613177,0.0022864307,0.0015345343,0.00038600393,0.00013582005,0.000053650412,0.000007390079,0.0008651147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98237646,0.000007970513,0.016859297,0.00048626785,0.00021019617,0.0000033525039,0.000016297545,0.000011266555,0.000028867544],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856836,0.00007851974,0.00078217825,0.000111086745,0.00033976694,0.00012010907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99731636,0.0005060214,0.0013270209,0.00021363462,0.00056876446,0.00006818013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007429932,0.0001093788,0.00027981546,0.00013542482,0.000052644515,0.000013973219,0.0001674658,0.00013108415,0.00028843962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003542019,0.00009033877,0.00014191789,0.00013993306,0.00010143782,0.000080985774,0.000019051071,0.00046758231,0.0000063614075],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019556768,0.0029003515,0.033497766,0.0008682535,0.0010891625,0.000686916,0.012110677,0.001381801,0.6535695,0.2445034,0.0343457,0.013090813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009506784,0.0014180213,0.87003726,0.00082574296,0.00041151972,0.0078604035,0.0026186449,0.0011783742,0.030762278,0.014535279,0.05995668,0.00088900025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006884928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009763713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8365395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000292259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025351043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36839083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008398116","doi":"10.1016/s0378-2166(03)00051-1","title":"Evaluative metadiscursive comments and face-work in conversational discourse","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Psychology; Construct (python library); Face (sociological concept); Affect (linguistics); Linguistics; Conversation analysis; Discourse analysis; Social psychology; Communication; Computer science","score_opus":0.045749942190809766,"score_gpt":0.3229865131530607,"score_spread":0.27723657096225096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008398116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85364026,0.0030571716,0.0038264762,0.007832724,0.0018828927,0.00046335917,0.00006114045,0.000010200435,0.12922575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974971,0.00006696862,0.0012118596,0.00023034048,0.00023594609,0.000001352885,0.0000029883035,0.0000073000497,0.00074616424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897707,0.00012551974,0.00041724788,0.00006196017,0.00030693217,0.00011128418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990128,0.00018434363,0.00039631716,0.000069022484,0.00027124648,0.0000662374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006898669,0.00009263679,0.00024568528,0.00014559363,0.00008693385,0.00010645232,0.000073115276,0.000021271515,0.0008571819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045770014,0.000066804016,0.00007443376,0.000043215277,0.00015230043,0.00016292857,0.000011860094,0.00014411415,0.000007316259],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035664358,0.0003064924,0.006115818,0.000026227697,0.00045234757,0.000032230157,0.07528402,0.0004925804,0.0000041084745,0.9118562,0.0050754836,0.00031886806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008813393,0.00071921473,0.007698804,0.00076867355,0.0032886735,0.000059787744,0.4529689,0.004960173,0.00020639437,0.30886793,0.21053521,0.0011128505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001141459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000058681417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60298824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039041108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000083748106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9385541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024002186","doi":"10.1016/s0378-2166(01)00060-1","title":"Repetitions as self-repair strategies in English and German conversations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":150,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"German; Linguistics; Demonstrative; Psychology; Verb; Repetition (rhetorical device); Pronoun; Computer science","score_opus":0.018830081132987463,"score_gpt":0.2890146241682085,"score_spread":0.27018454303522105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024002186","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55408865,0.00078653026,0.00010365787,0.0005857329,0.00038293688,0.00013966628,0.000008984196,0.00008280253,0.44382107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953258,0.0002698549,0.0035426172,0.00010201127,0.00014182,0.0000037293973,0.000002334449,0.000010440783,0.0006014152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990314,0.0001596372,0.00046524298,0.00005756249,0.00017492435,0.00011122749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988791,0.0002137278,0.00031889332,0.00020063776,0.00033561498,0.000052057145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047019016,0.00009111005,0.00017062135,0.00015665882,0.00015108768,0.00029857687,0.00012240333,0.00003403795,0.0006880699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023840825,0.00007667145,0.00006138304,0.000048226335,0.00015578592,0.00081619207,0.000017664523,0.00023634374,0.000010684988],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018787027,0.000104070336,0.00018356756,0.000031498224,0.000049129758,0.000012340665,0.12345308,0.000024971134,0.000008697971,0.87483805,0.0012754289,0.000017252914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011023339,0.00019092097,0.00095448433,0.00018517955,0.00015916025,0.00013039752,0.5950208,0.0001566376,0.000045963156,0.13812222,0.26366365,0.0002683007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026725707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005119224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73671585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037018006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024038888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7533883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052453443","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2012.08.003","title":"Joint attention helps explain why children omit new referents","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; British Academy; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Demonstrative; Psychology; Joint attention; Linguistics; Realisation; Noun; Perspective (graphical); Deixis; Cognitive psychology; Maxim; Ostensive definition; Developmental psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03622710532896149,"score_gpt":0.3013719151544145,"score_spread":0.265144809825453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052453443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97499377,0.0013522728,0.0074374164,0.0010126791,0.0020356223,0.00014589189,0.0000023637192,0.000019142137,0.013000866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98319685,0.00005899088,0.008984749,0.0008237917,0.0010053192,0.0000020390057,0.000016456886,0.000028609884,0.0058831647],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870384,0.00010832864,0.0005566172,0.0000670789,0.00028827335,0.00027588752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901557,0.000036991045,0.0005294189,0.00015619429,0.000065001695,0.00019682459],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006012976,0.000121319965,0.00022156945,0.00015499967,0.000045934372,0.000031387306,0.00015460492,0.00009668023,0.0034421948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001201872,0.00009405353,0.00011567538,0.00010719903,0.000014495281,0.00028609674,0.00003258259,0.00022673236,0.00044514297],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001089685,0.0007464271,0.21282056,0.000024531157,0.00058446464,0.0000203341,0.016393892,0.0000033280378,0.0006718587,0.0030380823,0.7383727,0.027214885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005223302,0.00026417602,0.9524786,0.00019325555,0.00028049914,0.000619719,0.0048156627,0.000008043457,0.00034334647,0.0021522522,0.033136655,0.00048451728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023742157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000060745915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.739658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004620171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041483076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99746877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062868280","doi":"10.1016/s0378-2166(03)00117-6","title":"Pragmatic functions of local diaphonic repetitions in conversation","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Repetition (rhetorical device); Intonation (linguistics); Function (biology); Linguistics; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Speech act; Key (lock); Communication; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021361712980464593,"score_gpt":0.32733208748468123,"score_spread":0.30597037450421666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062868280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9227232,0.000705562,0.05535276,0.0008155916,0.0013517541,0.00023253834,0.0000141280325,0.0000069151524,0.018797558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978652,0.000064132575,0.001578046,0.00003786831,0.000031423253,0.000005850199,0.0000024078827,0.000009906764,0.00040514083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998375,0.00039916663,0.00074403966,0.000076067714,0.00022073236,0.0001850107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985409,0.0004697461,0.00047205787,0.0002200127,0.00022613679,0.000071153794],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012509268,0.00007663068,0.0002536573,0.00035182026,0.00003062752,0.000008558498,0.00012962468,0.000113441914,0.0014489664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043093436,0.000069139795,0.000085679305,0.00036816482,0.00014840123,0.00007635866,0.000012761392,0.0004259664,0.00007540485],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012526809,0.014882834,0.121074475,0.0014618273,0.0031306052,0.00101798,0.17995852,0.011097552,0.03848505,0.5126788,0.08967601,0.025283648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02474792,0.0069393367,0.5807279,0.0014781306,0.0008609965,0.005219235,0.11038689,0.0047881906,0.009804576,0.2074822,0.046173505,0.0013911428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026149424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000059078182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45965338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006765088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001980082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069733889","doi":"10.1016/s0378-2166(02)80012-1","title":"Ist Deutsch noch internationale Wissenschaftssprache? Englisch auch für die Lehre an den deutschsprachigen Hochschulen","year":2002,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Linguistic Education and Pedagogy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Psychology; Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.08390721047989252,"score_gpt":0.3387318760185297,"score_spread":0.2548246655386372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069733889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62625784,0.07550023,0.002761967,0.028023198,0.045264877,0.001350543,0.0006377152,0.00019794515,0.22000566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91636246,0.0043753497,0.0082719205,0.001202082,0.028873375,0.00000873658,0.000070342314,0.00014519147,0.040690526],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953388,0.00050070765,0.0020768421,0.0003367009,0.001160949,0.00058601866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993287,0.00095691485,0.002191618,0.0005962496,0.002398214,0.00056996767],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015402726,0.00052986684,0.00081070943,0.00050143775,0.00075548014,0.0010956674,0.0009821957,0.00027930434,0.012700486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027042679,0.00047211925,0.00038385272,0.000112282774,0.00031795175,0.00090315426,0.00012840691,0.0013421049,0.0011931786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027453035,0.0064932117,0.0064231264,0.0010026841,0.0037572975,0.0008168566,0.4192037,0.00037539515,0.00015531815,0.3841074,0.160888,0.016502475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001178364,0.0007114643,0.00061084394,0.00046178277,0.0010824385,0.00023287069,0.022481157,0.00505382,0.00008387533,0.0020905812,0.9653525,0.0006603272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001327081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040415896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80446446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020743547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039637898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086756136","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.011","title":"Centering and noun phrase realization in Kaqchikel Mayan","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Noun phrase; Realization (probability); Linguistics; Noun; Nominalization; Phrase; Determiner phrase; Psychology; Philosophy; Natural language processing; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.031286201890742535,"score_gpt":0.4635785005962958,"score_spread":0.43229229870555325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086756136","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857633,0.000022843868,0.00023641244,0.0018102899,0.0006081876,0.000046848985,7.5870093e-7,0.0000039196416,0.011507428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960942,0.00014820178,0.0029336645,0.00017710598,0.00040247568,2.8150373e-7,3.7146054e-7,0.0000035861292,0.0002400757],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944305,0.00006227895,0.0002363783,0.00002958728,0.00014338242,0.00008531693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995329,0.000059600425,0.00019694664,0.00004313073,0.00007839561,0.00008902243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078367756,0.000033269167,0.000074638265,0.0000991129,0.00008052114,0.000052494895,0.00007416104,0.000042742322,0.00008361202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009046369,0.000030084178,0.000016147342,0.000099331904,0.00004743055,0.00014948825,0.000008418879,0.00016209607,0.0000023200394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004359133,0.00053167343,0.113782234,0.00014638073,0.000025768566,0.000023774335,0.5497195,0.00007102415,0.00920375,0.2177784,0.0029660086,0.10570789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025675572,0.00013882296,0.13577513,0.0004027689,0.00005567815,0.000114708135,0.05305595,0.0032478354,0.0006349132,0.020615984,0.7829183,0.0004723709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003480237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023011721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7799523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000224967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016489251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1284108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102901208","doi":"10.1016/s0378-2166(02)00201-1","title":"The interrogation as a type of dialogue","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Interrogation; Argumentation theory; Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.029584423648084716,"score_gpt":0.2958388677965046,"score_spread":0.26625444414841987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102901208","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38329628,0.0003734608,0.61101264,0.00059065735,0.0022201359,0.00011692508,2.6913438e-7,0.0000074700856,0.0023821644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98612857,0.000040333663,0.013638408,0.000032121305,0.000042618198,2.950845e-7,9.366683e-8,0.000002290105,0.00011525863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917084,0.00012664564,0.0003885273,0.000032142354,0.00022297478,0.00005888414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880064,0.00016462497,0.00062322797,0.000142918,0.00024105802,0.00002753305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009080056,0.00003816405,0.00009155918,0.000041830288,0.000044800712,0.00004365736,0.00024196661,0.000023550267,0.0000050517906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003901731,0.000022901757,0.000043308697,0.00013041784,0.000012008897,0.00020252084,0.000016514256,0.000069342736,0.0000107752285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003710433,0.00033283082,0.0023601914,0.0001548712,0.00021800284,0.000022756634,0.020598043,0.0014808404,0.019708171,0.92673075,0.008354746,0.02000171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008375735,0.0076320046,0.03566535,0.0022576996,0.0003253781,0.0027286508,0.011098115,0.32378772,0.13441545,0.20399444,0.2683619,0.0013575581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003563095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000051858497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7227363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002718265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011259238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09339065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106110953","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.013","title":"Editorials’ genre and media roles: Le Monde's editorials from 1999 to 2001","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Linguistics and Discourse Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Media studies; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.03843885235218079,"score_gpt":0.26005425121347847,"score_spread":0.2216153988612977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106110953","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67448175,0.0078017986,0.0019397275,0.0056439294,0.2754659,0.00041166114,0.0005759871,0.00006951638,0.033609714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37288925,0.001091164,0.0042202,0.00027818157,0.6205531,0.0000024591843,0.000013690821,0.000033603366,0.00091837946],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839395,0.000060190912,0.00068639405,0.0001055699,0.0005653788,0.0001885093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813455,0.00042446633,0.00048173196,0.00016143195,0.0005579837,0.0002398489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052045763,0.00014525469,0.00045962012,0.00014748568,0.00025325298,0.00017996093,0.00019462404,0.00006944905,0.00049252925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013716071,0.00011062403,0.00012432755,0.000036744044,0.00009708868,0.00017872949,0.000048806112,0.00017303639,0.000032691565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033655873,0.00014898735,0.00018014965,0.000013346574,0.000252723,0.00008577336,0.030488823,0.000075848584,0.00028718513,0.011269653,0.9569507,0.00021315008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007404303,0.00013577133,0.00010881725,0.00008703141,0.00035601534,0.000012195648,0.008751619,0.00013709484,0.0002499041,0.013964517,0.9752208,0.00023577735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003884248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003593518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34508717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026339585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018777944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53928494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136892597","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2005.01.016","title":"Examination dialogue: An argumentation framework for critically questioning an expert opinion","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Expert opinion; Argumentative; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.03496806484847136,"score_gpt":0.34673711945314084,"score_spread":0.31176905460466947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136892597","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032964207,0.0000981816,0.9650453,0.00045987667,0.0011817202,0.00017357082,0.000001304314,0.000027465427,0.00004838278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50677526,0.000015928163,0.49237016,0.00010072281,0.000706534,0.0000062281392,0.000012338918,0.0000066075036,0.0000062142235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857664,0.0002151897,0.0005994566,0.00012027484,0.00035646145,0.00013197686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984453,0.00024297576,0.00052478234,0.00018106487,0.0005303548,0.00007554612],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012035862,0.00008905445,0.0001468083,0.00012982755,0.00013198526,0.00027276643,0.00026473656,0.00008681703,0.0000048542624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000387918,0.00008085614,0.00005085458,0.000111991874,0.000012244719,0.0019116797,0.000015467262,0.000100266974,0.000001928701],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018203653,0.0007209591,0.00064119784,0.000105660125,0.000021908992,0.0000062615422,0.0057031643,0.003662676,0.0099936165,0.918393,0.0009837191,0.05974964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013754178,0.0015246959,0.03773376,0.00056403666,0.000023364928,0.00012676457,0.0007421948,0.78505254,0.005353861,0.16546479,0.0016394941,0.0003990966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015872225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008010682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78138983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007096243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049303835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32972178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161834173","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.013","title":"Slurring and common knowledge of ordinary language","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Utterance; Contempt; Linguistics; Sentence; Contradiction; Psychology; Meaning (existential); Competence (human resources); Emotive; Philosophy; Epistemology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03050663867209077,"score_gpt":0.2922494981573361,"score_spread":0.26174285948524534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161834173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9373376,0.0015643813,0.00039411095,0.0002576162,0.0006539421,0.000042802523,0.000003532149,0.000007267676,0.059738778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99698937,0.000054251577,0.0012162429,0.000079061196,0.0006148476,2.5521615e-7,5.3510405e-7,0.00000940785,0.0010360329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992987,0.00011436486,0.0003772507,0.00003792286,0.00008883839,0.000082930295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989305,0.00034460062,0.00041684197,0.00009838357,0.0001661113,0.00004353259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079564727,0.000068708105,0.00028322596,0.0000708187,0.00006988056,0.000026898946,0.00010062314,0.000037586116,0.00004117809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014795733,0.000052248604,0.00006680604,0.000014920618,0.00020320374,0.00011885822,0.00003392892,0.00022288147,0.000004095706],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003605156,0.0003395424,0.0016450927,0.0013086479,0.00019778984,0.00001380712,0.2735688,0.000017091836,0.0016852976,0.69038224,0.003548612,0.027257023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039971704,0.0032966374,0.003887163,0.0022569927,0.0009930697,0.00039598718,0.09684872,0.0038283488,0.004216215,0.16634212,0.7130718,0.00086571736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020063275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015538985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70952326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000078730955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002273234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21306363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167659325","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2013.09.003","title":"What language processing can tell us about perspective taking: A reply to Bezuidenhout (2013)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Conversation; Comprehension; Sentence processing; Representation (politics); Computer science; Sentence; Linguistics; Cognitive science; Psychology; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019258689494091406,"score_gpt":0.32969673993459686,"score_spread":0.31043805044050543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167659325","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97309065,0.0063036173,0.0021950274,0.003198822,0.0014481889,0.0004076116,0.0000042563775,0.000037996128,0.013313841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98705786,0.000090642476,0.0045464523,0.0043392833,0.00093570113,0.00002006567,0.0000020368307,0.000045046498,0.002962908],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982536,0.00014470519,0.00065539405,0.00019599519,0.00041355708,0.00033675134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975819,0.00009847411,0.00096828747,0.000287226,0.0008429392,0.00022119631],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057471683,0.00018934469,0.0003755978,0.00025978853,0.0000953935,0.00037744734,0.00028311028,0.00010496197,0.001727051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004672549,0.00014791302,0.0001410179,0.00026809773,0.00004609145,0.0006314037,0.000037697082,0.00040579675,0.0003221562],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002561049,0.000898168,0.0020040483,0.0002139006,0.00065391936,0.0008606448,0.7927902,0.000049840284,0.0061643417,0.0016626207,0.0681998,0.12624644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029835585,0.0014000272,0.0452638,0.0018022906,0.00070101226,0.002936486,0.9207051,0.0003364776,0.0027322231,0.006329913,0.013799656,0.0010094459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00078465516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013225446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12791494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017306472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012398299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2573947339","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.009","title":"Loving a partner in a Foreign Language","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Feeling; Multiculturalism; Quarter (Canadian coin); Social psychology; Variety (cybernetics); Personality; Scale (ratio); Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.03411938343792474,"score_gpt":0.4481352301175898,"score_spread":0.41401584667966507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2573947339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88715774,0.0002967219,0.0091004735,0.00059963466,0.00055214064,0.000085800275,0.0000011845784,0.0000052159307,0.10220108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99339426,0.000009296907,0.0036739823,0.000045279307,0.00016973673,0.0000010368532,5.0016143e-7,0.000008701386,0.002697227],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930716,0.000052694268,0.00034647147,0.000043626358,0.0001274353,0.00012264217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896735,0.0000997416,0.0006199869,0.00023455087,0.000037881087,0.000040508057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005708238,0.000058257036,0.00014524556,0.00009698824,0.000082607694,0.000051622443,0.00023505736,0.00007784532,0.00018688328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020270968,0.000044279197,0.0000617257,0.000030330555,0.00003846479,0.00016085654,0.000029313256,0.00027852444,0.00004215691],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056979476,0.00024755456,0.8920904,0.000034047553,0.00012589052,0.0005624884,0.01749835,0.00019800905,0.000106683096,0.0789882,0.0028046088,0.007286789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040274593,0.00028722454,0.9403632,0.00038200078,0.00016003313,0.00049883936,0.015868908,0.008224371,0.000027331027,0.026679507,0.003153183,0.0003278902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009547388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003227322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10623649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003060449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025571171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20462407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766451116","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2017.10.011","title":"Multimodal artefacts and the texture of viewpoint","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Multimodality; Embodied cognition; Gesture; Linguistics; Multimodal interaction; Modalities; Texture (cosmology); Psychology; Metonymy; Relation (database); Field (mathematics); Frame (networking); Section (typography); Computer science; Metaphor; Cognitive science; Sociology; Human–computer interaction; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Image (mathematics)","score_opus":0.01980878843360596,"score_gpt":0.31831185071499024,"score_spread":0.2985030622813843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766451116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9560039,0.0025413828,0.0045459317,0.0042604557,0.0012143455,0.00022533501,0.000008903294,0.000004921334,0.03119482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977812,0.000121193014,0.0012157033,0.00027412226,0.00022964229,0.0000011918264,3.2654262e-7,0.0000065601694,0.00037002738],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999213,0.00013132728,0.0003556352,0.00004615445,0.00016748923,0.00008642595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983898,0.0001794278,0.000986085,0.00026161844,0.0001400629,0.000043054253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008798468,0.00006742505,0.00024111917,0.000036557798,0.00010266362,0.000043580258,0.00020462608,0.00006357676,0.00018842521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048656808,0.00003529766,0.00009292539,0.000017010014,0.00017242957,0.00010317317,0.000028609418,0.00022303576,0.000012904635],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028949508,0.0014946193,0.006565595,0.0006045905,0.0025433,0.0005115694,0.1396904,0.000023059163,0.0059243264,0.2007307,0.027641352,0.6113756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.04855765,0.0018531401,0.5882375,0.0014316122,0.002954554,0.004832272,0.039145175,0.0023707615,0.0050561167,0.2769664,0.027683338,0.0009114854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018140612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010694298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6104641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000522193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018914274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20631239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894927725","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2018.09.006","title":"Tag-naxon? (Tag-Right?) in instructional talk: Opening or blocking learning opportunities","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Blocking (statistics); Psychology; Computer science; Computer network","score_opus":0.11555797606653302,"score_gpt":0.32496162861631545,"score_spread":0.20940365254978244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894927725","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8447295,0.00037634626,0.00038206167,0.001449232,0.0010577514,0.00014169872,0.000007785869,0.000044835477,0.15181078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861272,0.000114616756,0.0060509094,0.00015760236,0.0013353456,0.000003663094,0.0000051073475,0.000026498645,0.0061790603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998226,0.00019759587,0.0008441558,0.00008813361,0.0004229456,0.00022120359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808764,0.0002566898,0.0008741355,0.00020537866,0.00050206616,0.00007410481],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084093853,0.00016058159,0.0003170035,0.00033310146,0.00042901863,0.00049078127,0.00044514798,0.000053795717,0.0046262904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026443927,0.00011609257,0.0000825689,0.00007592511,0.00042873903,0.0010305904,0.000113591894,0.00055511616,0.000021601054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025094496,0.00035014364,0.0013492196,0.00019638293,0.00037450725,0.00044841538,0.18850212,0.00070098124,0.00037096103,0.78248453,0.0061770915,0.018794676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017869818,0.0007087905,0.0005499563,0.0010633897,0.00012268937,0.0009698183,0.3640471,0.00201655,0.00043032755,0.012714139,0.61504614,0.0005440949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055186938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010731921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76977044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007607923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003093644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946148733","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.005","title":"Sarcasm between siblings: Children's use of relationship information in processing ironic remarks","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sarcasm; Psychology; Irony; Comprehension; Object (grammar); Attribution; Gaze; Literal and figurative language; Sibling; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Social psychology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.026126080266356638,"score_gpt":0.301005433896603,"score_spread":0.27487935363024635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946148733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99264866,0.00020364729,0.004475088,0.00011021547,0.00017639423,0.00019322956,0.00000677796,0.0000068965555,0.0021790937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99557674,0.00001458546,0.004103898,0.00007632459,0.00010102752,0.0000012901885,0.000019404082,0.00000964566,0.00009706656],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984142,0.00015060847,0.0009497815,0.00005599982,0.0002888193,0.00014055772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99804586,0.00031333748,0.001229883,0.00014991556,0.00021913846,0.000041879957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009237957,0.00008982139,0.00026340314,0.00048763992,0.000025546296,0.00004820738,0.000120849596,0.00013796803,0.00013394037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004928606,0.00007566187,0.00007719482,0.0003412835,0.000023941388,0.0011696988,0.000016155953,0.00040918472,0.000051801304],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012730387,0.00018272037,0.9387548,0.00027732147,0.00011618142,0.0000060378297,0.018654695,0.000375873,0.00010394091,0.0021318938,0.00059557235,0.03867365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016933576,0.00021911165,0.99028045,0.00050528196,0.00013324835,0.00008730838,0.0025158597,0.00032279844,0.00010219666,0.00366848,0.0003324333,0.0001394508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016504964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000464365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051525664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005023036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000084428604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30854017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966614013","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2019.07.002","title":"Figurative language development/acquisition research: Status and ways forward","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Literal and figurative language; Psychology; Set (abstract data type); Metaphor; Embodied cognition; Cognitive science; Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Psycholinguistics; Language development; Reading (process); Cognition; Computer science; Developmental psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04988368206069906,"score_gpt":0.3618918004989025,"score_spread":0.3120081184382035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966614013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96891934,0.0011253329,0.0025198697,0.000099749275,0.00037737985,0.00018166106,0.000006501018,0.000009401031,0.026760777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928112,0.000056236826,0.0051993015,0.00014566419,0.00017539463,0.000004495544,0.000010322017,0.0000149782,0.0015823743],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985934,0.00023492258,0.0003938473,0.00010145861,0.00041068785,0.00026567996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886656,0.00029896683,0.0002844393,0.00012943785,0.00031043644,0.00011018384],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012836965,0.00008996666,0.00020210841,0.0002297316,0.000071903,0.000051732994,0.00009680735,0.00008427382,0.0014286618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014673128,0.00006880958,0.00004400905,0.00016274067,0.000042884494,0.00019815072,0.00003015418,0.00035208664,0.00031830143],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012619185,0.0011692302,0.012080083,0.0006348578,0.0014297678,0.000731707,0.6684664,0.000012901451,0.030234192,0.058053937,0.030064123,0.19586086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015426492,0.00460069,0.20891356,0.0014846049,0.00045405232,0.0014838239,0.6055202,0.00026380736,0.030433036,0.056147005,0.07384563,0.0014270939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000088859915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007505664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19683348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060950693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008672241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999549733","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2019.11.002","title":"Metaphor and what is meant: Metaphorical content, what is said, and contextualism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Grice; Metaphor; Contextualism; Content (measure theory); Epistemology; Linguistics; Pragmatics; Psychology; Philosophy; Interpretation (philosophy); Mathematics","score_opus":0.06092749645764313,"score_gpt":0.3133544094078879,"score_spread":0.2524269129502448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999549733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76516163,0.19964284,0.00452022,0.026818309,0.0020631165,0.0004682029,0.00004011076,0.000036051482,0.001249515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9254818,0.03753623,0.0029789414,0.032566894,0.0007159996,0.000008423466,0.00000553875,0.000057612688,0.00064854254],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978825,0.0003068613,0.0008494435,0.0002491717,0.0004455409,0.00026648302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808747,0.0003571302,0.0006704804,0.00019212291,0.00031828866,0.00037451566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073574815,0.00024677097,0.0007185027,0.00012909836,0.000092217415,0.00061893393,0.0001866733,0.0001739178,0.00089231785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019973972,0.00018321388,0.00020625445,0.00018670056,0.00013495133,0.00171067,0.00006508069,0.00044945872,0.000056901077],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012917053,0.0007027905,0.00069832127,0.00045903886,0.005302247,0.0010973578,0.3677801,5.531264e-7,0.008173777,0.015226046,0.05948074,0.53978735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016194368,0.0036932665,0.003530153,0.0011197655,0.0063423505,0.0046001202,0.7603264,0.0007939019,0.011675307,0.017252702,0.17288496,0.0015867152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016710685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004641288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5382006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020086205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029257631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97702545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088331110","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.003","title":"Up north there: Discourse-pragmatic deixis in Northern Ontario","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Linguistic Variation and Morphology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Deixis; Locative case; Linguistics; Value (mathematics); French; Pragmatics; Sociology; Geography; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03333601547341808,"score_gpt":0.3141568156044611,"score_spread":0.28082080013104305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088331110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96415365,0.00006424433,0.0038103093,0.015114956,0.0011759769,0.00017275497,0.0000024940887,0.000015719708,0.015489899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99524564,0.00002466229,0.002902017,0.00078098953,0.00051659043,0.0000011438362,0.0000014273078,0.00001005562,0.0005174642],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984856,0.00024111841,0.0005800273,0.000076991724,0.00041694468,0.00019929926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987655,0.00021437294,0.00053833175,0.000084735635,0.00021004485,0.00018697037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078252907,0.00008664432,0.0002638877,0.00006616115,0.000099555764,0.00005159767,0.00030007982,0.00007113553,0.00035524715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002362356,0.00007145101,0.000081552644,0.0002219343,0.000085211854,0.00012858899,0.0000251359,0.0003415599,0.000050561866],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053683176,0.00018110611,0.61429673,0.000042943182,0.00008663666,0.0002361542,0.35568345,0.00059156655,0.000020777436,0.02234897,0.0033537971,0.0031042157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0076533384,0.0011363671,0.39932442,0.00038866207,0.0005099124,0.000110288136,0.096981816,0.0014652314,0.00003225041,0.026681429,0.46455413,0.0011621516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033231971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6046551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6013319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022082259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010027904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50237024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184137896","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2021.06.019","title":"Logical Form – Not logical enough for logic, not linguistic enough for linguistics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Sentence; Generative grammar; Utterance; Logical form; Computer science; Atomic sentence; Logical consequence; Representation (politics); Philosophy","score_opus":0.04775607042432032,"score_gpt":0.33888393546512746,"score_spread":0.2911278650408071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184137896","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000331797,0.0013763823,0.9927517,0.0031302683,0.0015364281,0.00034353285,0.000026722862,0.00013295843,0.00037018582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17692402,0.000076182805,0.8192633,0.0019088212,0.0016034271,0.000014700187,0.000007087191,0.00002206459,0.00018044461],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732447,0.000079624544,0.0011468716,0.00033218905,0.00061296916,0.00050385785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99306434,0.0020328609,0.0009904341,0.00045209064,0.0032642668,0.00019600711],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00139695,0.0002827384,0.0006640177,0.00012535755,0.00022755469,0.00038856218,0.0012921799,0.00028753543,0.00001334848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030956313,0.0002106679,0.00038016736,0.0002826575,0.000080275706,0.00017890785,0.00030934933,0.0005545308,0.0000036037634],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014986315,0.00049431354,0.00000970203,0.000551057,0.00009553324,0.00047539527,0.001241605,0.00007865695,0.003738105,0.9717259,0.0052793706,0.016160505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001491725,0.0016673012,0.000018958566,0.0003537748,0.00018300606,0.00076297205,0.000068913025,0.033296607,0.06725121,0.75884855,0.13546415,0.00059283845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":9.462105e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020447033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21287735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014690707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044162013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97720635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210794128","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2021.09.007","title":"Book review","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016528347661243826,"score_gpt":0.3107019587252859,"score_spread":0.29417361106404205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210794128","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004185347,0.9859544,0.000980085,0.006396972,0.00031503724,0.000073394825,0.000005468651,0.0000131744955,0.0058429344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011311837,0.7224989,0.10892757,0.14301266,0.0016446251,0.000003853763,0.000009504526,0.0002558771,0.022515826],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833566,0.00018500318,0.0007729048,0.00004962226,0.00052384037,0.00013299473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792546,0.00012266765,0.0008675294,0.00023066971,0.0007373461,0.00011632292],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010049207,0.00008536995,0.00036961553,0.00005362884,0.00002714594,0.000029876055,0.00016884813,0.000030842555,0.004488233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017954437,0.00006810611,0.00018083354,0.00026473062,0.000021212829,0.0002750737,0.000039700964,0.00027971473,0.0012029648],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029325486,0.00008057298,0.000023152883,0.0007076972,0.0000633374,0.00037704373,0.000054890726,0.000011007376,0.0015760108,0.00014542043,0.99630266,0.0006552592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027564596,0.000039889237,0.00007457401,0.003850844,0.00021652726,0.0023734441,0.000031333813,0.00004309537,0.0016298968,0.00031946055,0.99106884,0.00007644394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":8.479429e-8,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.0526257e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2634555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000076219745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031572263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317933678","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2023.01.007","title":"Socio-pragmatic variation in request refusals in Cameroon French","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Formality; Pragmatics; Variation (astronomy); Sociocultural evolution; Linguistics; Realisation; Relation (database); Psychology; Sociolinguistics; Contextualization; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; Anthropology","score_opus":0.042930986496901705,"score_gpt":0.3139261259824292,"score_spread":0.2709951394855275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317933678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9587538,0.0004387356,0.000107384876,0.0040075877,0.00058243395,0.00022155356,0.000013750805,0.00004973873,0.035824988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971138,0.00022681941,0.0011852387,0.000103452396,0.00026304324,0.00000843934,0.000010909224,0.000019065656,0.001069193],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998113,0.00030523693,0.0009611155,0.000074476666,0.00035045715,0.00019576417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983694,0.00044227022,0.0006957423,0.00027248246,0.00018084259,0.00003924373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017849334,0.00011670976,0.00031045856,0.000498906,0.000080553,0.0001916489,0.00033973655,0.00006066293,0.00042671716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048083052,0.00009630407,0.00006407062,0.00020843164,0.00008942397,0.0006326953,0.00005032657,0.00038870212,0.0000949432],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021223042,0.00046691456,0.0028527572,0.0003692394,0.0001060647,0.00018252931,0.58533084,0.0016394602,0.00082519144,0.39143682,0.014207095,0.0025618745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004855732,0.0005717319,0.09298102,0.0027642117,0.00019683583,0.000099121484,0.39999202,0.0085345125,0.00010749292,0.45304853,0.035785228,0.0010635583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025473052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002653252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1853388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013492175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015529506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46722537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320401858","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2023.01.011","title":"Book review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Demonstrative; Linguistics; Epistemology; Intuition; Philosophy of language; Stalemate; Philosophy of mind; Psychology; Philosophy; Computer science; Cognitive science; Metaphysics","score_opus":0.03596340550001283,"score_gpt":0.28205546428245093,"score_spread":0.24609205878243812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320401858","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004916109,0.2058216,0.0042481073,0.6653479,0.02382346,0.0010688318,0.000051592808,0.00038072641,0.09434169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14630961,0.34833163,0.01976094,0.18029982,0.06383548,0.000035130022,0.000098117765,0.00047610968,0.24085315],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989338,0.00004601992,0.00056583964,0.000041231287,0.0003034414,0.0001096721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874556,0.00018093463,0.0005472882,0.00011546986,0.0003674994,0.000043268712],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075499737,0.000069590715,0.00022531088,0.00010626279,0.000080106445,0.000066987304,0.00013616186,0.000019220144,0.0028011133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014632348,0.00005399129,0.00009435654,0.000046658395,0.00003427884,0.00013718034,0.000021461918,0.00012530125,0.000429105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025148056,0.000028503946,0.000010808809,0.0007559484,0.00005912593,0.00003709694,0.008874626,0.0000093945955,0.000007726133,0.10441663,0.88494545,0.00085219706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015812232,0.00006013489,0.000045158933,0.0015176289,0.00014344021,0.000027173386,0.0008309747,0.0003970718,0.000014214175,0.033163894,0.9635612,0.000081029946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005370185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008491984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48504806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024904217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005064262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376881511","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2023.05.001","title":"Book review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Interrogative; Utterance; Conversation; Sentence; Linguistics; Position (finance); Psychology; Expression (computer science); Conversation analysis; Turn-taking; Computer science; Philosophy; Business; Programming language","score_opus":0.050878492126818706,"score_gpt":0.3283859582954197,"score_spread":0.277507466168601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376881511","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017826878,0.6471323,0.00013948164,0.04386291,0.0012678795,0.00029706294,0.000018625833,0.00014281487,0.30535623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03880054,0.6283905,0.0031021845,0.07607246,0.0045545734,0.000026427351,0.000043507014,0.00014065596,0.2488692],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909735,0.00007577743,0.00045095658,0.000031182706,0.00024689894,0.00009784282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989394,0.00013965566,0.00042757366,0.00023145697,0.00022273755,0.00003915448],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056195527,0.00006599965,0.00019847219,0.00008430047,0.00009487374,0.00010266202,0.0002957099,0.0000145135855,0.004769667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001611977,0.00004563047,0.00009581745,0.000054991222,0.00008125736,0.00034360104,0.000041256226,0.00016216558,0.00036459285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012055499,0.000019577381,0.000002110679,0.00028774366,0.000033461863,0.000014393916,0.0062257303,0.0000043842765,0.000006102224,0.047249597,0.9454383,0.0007173443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001012781,0.000033607303,0.000015712723,0.0008688399,0.00005679068,0.000022724245,0.004614652,0.000023988534,0.0000095044325,0.002328277,0.99186623,0.000058395184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000019200213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008735512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056487054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014626239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006737067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381804677","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2023.05.012","title":"Small talk across Englishes: A focus on Namibia","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Linguistic Variation and Morphology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"German; Varieties of English; Pragmatics; Linguistics; Irish; English language; Variety (cybernetics); Focus (optics); World Englishes; Sociology; American English; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.056224518846979946,"score_gpt":0.3553825334995373,"score_spread":0.29915801465255737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381804677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89146096,0.000050567036,0.0034253001,0.013339199,0.006806275,0.00023632035,0.000016903841,0.00012927079,0.08453523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99355525,0.00008520375,0.0024244369,0.00039263073,0.0013464714,0.0000012836739,9.3846444e-7,0.000010015709,0.002183759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883115,0.00017060495,0.0003594769,0.000060175036,0.00034834846,0.00023025359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860734,0.00051917543,0.00036438627,0.000091509995,0.00030248266,0.00011510076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021606109,0.000059768736,0.00016147371,0.000084188156,0.0002172615,0.000078812765,0.0002260515,0.00009258752,0.00012788597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007203969,0.000050111947,0.00008168161,0.00028176568,0.00007419266,0.00005684884,0.000028150123,0.00019924395,0.00010356925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112003225,0.0004463535,0.0025857943,0.000069264854,0.00022271482,0.0012501109,0.3875116,0.0006637297,0.0004690732,0.50500655,0.07269124,0.02897153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021279482,0.00060763664,0.0057439897,0.00018573186,0.00008307881,0.000068039764,0.055644706,0.00069057074,0.0003058437,0.09361944,0.8405699,0.0003530802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000090144844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046990602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7678787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007223063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019129644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86243445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408392965","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.02.007","title":"How to investigate implicit pragmatic phenomena in corpora","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Szegedi Tudományegyetem; Mount Allison University; Magyar Tudományos Akadémia","keywords":"Psychology; Linguistics; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01963106529511746,"score_gpt":0.30264805749367846,"score_spread":0.283016992198561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408392965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9175908,0.00093670934,0.029726349,0.008076299,0.0017303369,0.0005299819,0.000010988776,0.000027134904,0.041371383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829202,0.000024115618,0.008468282,0.0032819416,0.00035998193,0.000021691088,0.0000036553124,0.00002291307,0.0048971996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984707,0.00022864314,0.0006841981,0.0001256171,0.00023815155,0.0002526816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998682,0.0002208853,0.0005282876,0.00025249546,0.00018157177,0.00013473598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009376659,0.00014653367,0.00039269647,0.0005253494,0.000036323137,0.00009388791,0.00027041484,0.000094738,0.0001314714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005938467,0.00011974575,0.00009152118,0.0006113067,0.000037349713,0.00016744345,0.000041515294,0.0003427858,0.00005707568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008968052,0.0030640059,0.016668951,0.0016798072,0.001945482,0.0016978793,0.09121657,0.00041326566,0.031847622,0.47693634,0.1357816,0.23785166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017527862,0.0028926802,0.11582153,0.004298595,0.0015096815,0.0012590839,0.09112768,0.0011708845,0.00494061,0.6578215,0.09969212,0.001937773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015932426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000036732345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2359139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008827224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011263026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48830903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410033196","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.04.006","title":"The effect of online methods on epistemic inference and scalar implicature","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Implicature; Inference; Scalar (mathematics); Epistemology; Psychology; Pragmatics; Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.018854571537288662,"score_gpt":0.4612427903061239,"score_spread":0.4423882187688353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410033196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9765112,0.004541978,0.0026535944,0.00982065,0.0009680636,0.00013220185,0.000006066198,0.0000051285897,0.005361118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99027723,0.00039063726,0.008479071,0.00014471619,0.00009535721,0.000003885289,0.0000010120019,0.0000051533075,0.0006029387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989387,0.000397912,0.00041535828,0.00005864609,0.000092142174,0.00009725752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945702,0.0047062477,0.0004106277,0.00018139808,0.0001044793,0.000027049682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012380986,0.00007851893,0.00023398765,0.000054980064,0.000068325695,0.000023735129,0.00021000345,0.00008241899,0.000012041253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009696061,0.00004113832,0.0000640047,0.00011539479,0.000112728616,0.000026433994,0.000029892974,0.00030025322,0.0000011569284],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010684861,0.0004374375,0.08268855,0.0009768873,0.0012005139,0.000016614931,0.0020707522,0.00021688078,0.0048639504,0.58524936,0.03840933,0.28280127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017358186,0.0036460778,0.8396098,0.00093945017,0.00037060547,0.0002934223,0.005078468,0.00015020758,0.0028992651,0.11998351,0.025071671,0.00022169162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006977806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000035221744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7569213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021029009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006157109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1677572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413246018","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.07.013","title":"Putting negotiation on a ‘principal-ed’ footing: A corpus-informed discourse analysis of person deixis in diplomatic debates","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Deixis; Negotiation; Principal (computer security); Linguistics; Discourse analysis; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.03805956976609867,"score_gpt":0.3377791611832958,"score_spread":0.2997195914171972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413246018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97178096,0.00042390663,0.0010109092,0.0010678741,0.0001775029,0.00017570752,0.0000104417795,0.000016270233,0.025336448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99722815,0.00006982335,0.002090755,0.000097211705,0.000061915,0.00000533339,0.000009632249,0.000010523399,0.00042665863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981371,0.00015543099,0.0010628488,0.00008441978,0.00038063596,0.0001795287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99698937,0.0008885964,0.0014506,0.0003229049,0.0003063264,0.000042209995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007663749,0.00015592527,0.00054757774,0.0010716658,0.00013219807,0.00019342976,0.0003736469,0.000048977763,0.00017191719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008478312,0.00011943913,0.00024358106,0.00038408503,0.0001446539,0.00043439312,0.000046240108,0.000264337,0.0000043294135],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014101119,0.0010998765,0.026561785,0.00091081864,0.0035866413,0.000024026176,0.45528862,0.019479178,0.00031194033,0.48072502,0.0011175743,0.010753505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003644318,0.0007551591,0.06646066,0.004837922,0.0061747497,0.000014793364,0.7943838,0.100746125,0.001076634,0.019544631,0.0016349753,0.00072621054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009134294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001467858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4611804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013859189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019792977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48705864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414272901","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.08.010","title":"Negotiating truth and relevance: A new typology of English rising declaratives","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia Graduate School; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Negotiation; Typology; Politeness; Relation (database); Relevance (law); Evidentiality; Variation (astronomy); Narrative; Relevance theory","score_opus":0.02256017017833487,"score_gpt":0.2723912746338605,"score_spread":0.24983110445552562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414272901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8815251,0.0028176373,0.042992387,0.0054720114,0.013596291,0.00026422032,0.000012636396,0.000036929545,0.053282805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982244,0.00008219797,0.01569521,0.000058581845,0.0014979152,2.5897987e-7,6.0693105e-7,0.0000080939135,0.0004131094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990134,0.00007377485,0.0006160931,0.000060058654,0.00013915838,0.000097489974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99720335,0.0011592654,0.0007813699,0.00008224553,0.0007396017,0.00003419493],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040456792,0.000081268896,0.00028095406,0.00015404224,0.000093766925,0.00009118766,0.000086814114,0.00004425084,0.000048518516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013296534,0.00006917471,0.000043510834,0.000039393868,0.00009785366,0.00014837236,0.000028383776,0.00016993211,6.233059e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002408929,0.000037074693,0.0006349681,0.0001205116,0.00011353089,0.000002683721,0.095862135,0.00011953343,0.000056437057,0.9008945,0.00059582584,0.0015386676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025098068,0.0005169017,0.0020478524,0.0015535617,0.00069617387,0.000021933394,0.12744509,0.007835516,0.00087539526,0.82965964,0.026520723,0.00031740623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005040906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005209208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.100718945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002279857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014602028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414714768","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.09.006","title":"Toward a granular analysis of the discourse marker ti: in Tunisian Arabic","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Situated; Discourse analysis; Meaning (existential); Arabic; Relevance (law); Discourse marker","score_opus":0.022449762857013004,"score_gpt":0.34544403206961993,"score_spread":0.32299426921260693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414714768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94782996,0.0007606385,0.0009775277,0.014141566,0.00069803355,0.0001549829,0.0000051806337,0.000004275805,0.035427816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99799067,0.00026782407,0.00048520812,0.00010585625,0.000067228284,6.9291883e-7,1.6910516e-7,0.0000016110686,0.0010807539],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988078,0.00023288414,0.0004291171,0.00004395953,0.00036738667,0.0001188749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990828,0.00022690857,0.00034527268,0.00008529129,0.00022919656,0.000030502011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011474744,0.000056640074,0.00031000035,0.00012649955,0.0001609165,0.000025139572,0.00027799117,0.000048870374,0.00003124082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017821926,0.000031680134,0.0002449309,0.0009830389,0.000255216,0.000056740915,0.00004147501,0.00015852899,4.5444153e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003398857,0.00028065586,0.63283545,0.0000871542,0.0022222244,0.000026286541,0.17155372,0.000518447,0.000035439673,0.18603504,0.0031169397,0.0032546653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076836377,0.000045084842,0.77501976,0.0004621643,0.0036545822,0.0000011259688,0.1525473,0.0008641007,0.000028579583,0.047028486,0.019379051,0.00020141422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032355014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015133475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1421843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000093263116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015801405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21335799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416527252","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2025.10.008","title":"Responding to new information with negative discourse particles nein/nee/nö in German talk-in-interaction","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Conversation; German; Embodied cognition; Function (biology); Conversation analysis","score_opus":0.023906243234995808,"score_gpt":0.34267606403379225,"score_spread":0.31876982079879645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416527252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9634491,0.00007062945,0.0023755028,0.005509721,0.00031160127,0.00021565131,0.0000039422757,0.000013460414,0.028050361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99544257,0.000017776829,0.0027251723,0.00031431057,0.00012350571,0.000005106805,0.000002392714,0.000006687491,0.0013624632],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885607,0.000104337974,0.0006354475,0.000048991085,0.00021250015,0.0001426595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893785,0.00023082491,0.00044068997,0.00018165709,0.00015581583,0.00005316935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040717938,0.00010450505,0.00020419132,0.0008805633,0.000074641495,0.0003517351,0.00020872656,0.000025831052,0.000120877114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020814191,0.00007720119,0.000037865197,0.0002704589,0.000060172675,0.0021811097,0.00004087795,0.00026960054,0.000014961197],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059482775,0.00021368863,0.0009639472,0.00009667681,0.00009766534,0.00003261001,0.42247286,0.0052139633,0.00027087648,0.548228,0.005750799,0.016064014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045597586,0.0006887941,0.008794677,0.0040709856,0.00016431721,0.000062848834,0.8160878,0.0029920314,0.002190232,0.039064504,0.12074341,0.0005806503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019966275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036197277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50916356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014178074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002023853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33917895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}