{"meta":{"query_hash":"6221f2a66b8b","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Private International Law"},"cohort_total":7,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":7,"exported":7,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/6221f2a66b8b","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Private+International+Law"},"results":[{"id":"W2234575015","doi":"10.1080/17536235.2007.11424324","title":"Enforcement of Foreign Non-Monetary Judgments in Canada (And Beyond)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Private International Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Choice of law; Payment; Common law; Law and economics; Economics; Business; Conflict of laws; Finance","score_opus":0.013112616779021393,"score_gpt":0.283167650151595,"score_spread":0.27005503337257364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2234575015","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7758651,0.000032322467,0.0006442651,0.0012485019,0.0003009364,0.00008015237,0.000010461469,0.0000010888907,0.22181718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985045,0.00006581646,0.0007817303,0.0003452122,0.00014721148,6.903279e-7,0.0000018629439,0.0000026799278,0.00015027513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989608,0.000011868204,0.0004022567,0.000050419058,0.00046384495,0.00011080144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942255,0.00007263076,0.0002682826,0.00004324758,0.00012000057,0.000073315925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061210565,0.000042049895,0.00009317744,0.000058675683,0.000048540634,0.000014060191,0.00023840292,0.000020569694,0.00010919361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030362275,0.000037757858,0.000029653143,0.000067759116,0.000057726986,0.00016509782,0.000042519336,0.00009518568,6.7921826e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003036508,0.000040825373,0.039811905,0.0000036609429,0.00003686284,0.000016786791,0.00057375635,0.00015499727,0.0004198623,0.95679367,0.00021996777,0.0018973601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023749028,0.00015415346,0.20715661,0.00018302511,0.00003733371,0.000024618093,0.0048853075,0.0004896268,0.009143536,0.1111593,0.6640632,0.0003283397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6860995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83254397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84563434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003570251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028624697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31599078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260457615","doi":"10.1080/17536235.2007.11424315","title":"Canada and the US Contemplate Changes to Foreign-Judgment Enforcement","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Private International Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Conflict of laws; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Publishing; Economics","score_opus":0.016762771594698533,"score_gpt":0.28943341179609955,"score_spread":0.272670640201401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260457615","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6410604,0.00014311787,0.0015112855,0.07495966,0.0022807082,0.00030796006,0.0000104178935,0.000007795256,0.27971864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99324656,0.00010543362,0.000113115726,0.0048135314,0.0006003032,0.000001504775,6.0522456e-7,0.000003242052,0.0011157197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988983,0.000031487925,0.00025949234,0.000055062334,0.00062153523,0.00013407622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929863,0.000116118004,0.00020730734,0.000044434473,0.00021963782,0.00011384939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015583141,0.000053343112,0.00009916452,0.00004584469,0.00018992272,0.00007244235,0.00021802526,0.000021890188,0.0001353579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007079974,0.00003559277,0.000035077013,0.000046710524,0.00009729868,0.00009699149,0.000045177312,0.00008504255,0.0000010940975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002042876,0.000009079742,0.000950015,0.0000011627175,0.000064965825,0.000017036673,0.0013064172,0.000021569505,0.00010599381,0.99349856,0.0012597226,0.0025611783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065896363,0.000051206975,0.0019867714,0.000025264044,0.0000098962255,0.000011788604,0.00037806723,0.000015188024,0.00045151042,0.0029283403,0.993437,0.000046015353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5112877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8649237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99217725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026156663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012628439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4919667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890602623","doi":"10.1080/17441048.2018.1509498","title":"Assumed jurisdiction in Canada: identifying and interpreting presumptive connecting factors","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Private International Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Exclusive jurisdiction; Business; Project commissioning; Political science; Law; Public relations; Publishing; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02887300920327236,"score_gpt":0.3275674387100743,"score_spread":0.298694429506802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890602623","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9764038,0.000023668403,0.0008289146,0.0018354694,0.00070341735,0.000055882916,0.0000052787627,0.000005402267,0.020138169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99900085,0.000026605052,0.00045194078,0.00011385096,0.00033995142,8.8093725e-7,8.8735356e-7,0.0000046483988,0.000060407667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990954,0.00006036387,0.0003224248,0.00008334173,0.00032174287,0.00011675222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918187,0.00017769927,0.00032087122,0.00003746723,0.00021668561,0.0000654172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005204341,0.00005196122,0.0000928329,0.000066588014,0.00020509431,0.00009135824,0.00021513742,0.000028021892,0.00008071362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030511158,0.000047617876,0.000027450853,0.00007679339,0.00008376569,0.00041153794,0.00006356581,0.00016890641,0.0000014427309],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000719759,0.0000519856,0.25731975,0.000009057704,0.00013628161,0.000020648837,0.024650417,0.00006158179,0.0040261494,0.70817107,0.0002868731,0.0051942216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014332882,0.00012218757,0.36867106,0.00073746947,0.00005010138,0.000041887928,0.026372096,0.002049461,0.011793552,0.028469425,0.5597715,0.00048799592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50754017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8383648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6797016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000623257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024397898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49573916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949157537","doi":"10.1080/17441048.2019.1599773","title":"Understanding public policy limits to the enforceability of forum selection clauses after <i>Douez v Facebook</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Private International Law","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University Health Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Enforcement; Context (archaeology); Political science; Supreme court; Doctrine; Public policy; Law; Selection (genetic algorithm); Law and economics; Public relations; Public administration; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.0513721871613127,"score_gpt":0.27256223669674323,"score_spread":0.22119004953543053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949157537","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38107035,0.00003345967,0.021388289,0.09778674,0.0033367435,0.000736454,0.000017588625,0.000055935012,0.49557444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99482197,0.000009930353,0.00007584677,0.003680618,0.00076348736,0.0000065793133,0.0000025543295,0.000011144674,0.0006278696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988403,0.000013946894,0.00041807856,0.0001012183,0.0004590546,0.00016745701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989414,0.00005284253,0.00044157982,0.00011137095,0.0004303135,0.000022465645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038256453,0.00009691468,0.00013983824,0.00030337757,0.00009020661,0.00025791398,0.0003513698,0.00004176053,0.0006310097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001494302,0.000069446935,0.00015282772,0.00032041053,0.000043718406,0.0012651146,0.000109536886,0.00015905875,0.00013780314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010146842,0.00005650151,0.020505968,0.000019344143,0.000090187576,7.0610315e-7,0.000020416237,0.00047414374,0.0018884875,0.9741865,0.0023287903,0.00032753486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004242485,0.000033720393,0.008222862,0.000060915234,0.000022860135,0.000013437265,0.00022479739,0.00085699686,0.0005197577,0.012019906,0.97750264,0.00009785558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009706825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025807213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97517383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002681367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005670802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69091135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124982549","doi":"10.1080/17536235.2006.11424311","title":"The Evolution of the Extra-Territorial<i>Mareva</i>Injunction in Canada: Three Issues","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Private International Law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.01205228781245244,"score_gpt":0.2561349588652942,"score_spread":0.24408267105284176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124982549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5896155,0.002351411,0.00026928633,0.035454627,0.0249696,0.0002719363,0.000030763786,0.000010922241,0.34702593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959217,0.00016850105,0.00006291393,0.000078859026,0.0020663773,0.0000013007481,6.734797e-7,0.0000054354127,0.0016942907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981201,0.00014848726,0.0005484663,0.00007155871,0.0009820842,0.00012928741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867916,0.0001877652,0.00051355106,0.00008503911,0.00051224517,0.000022236156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081290794,0.00007068424,0.000114571194,0.00004162037,0.00026303978,0.000051991712,0.0006693516,0.000024495394,0.00003557737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027491868,0.00004248359,0.00009749391,0.000119597076,0.0002158606,0.0002441969,0.00006430996,0.00016759196,0.0000021324204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004416317,0.000028005497,0.048537973,0.0000016163567,0.000035864687,0.0000034061059,0.000082669256,0.00016818027,0.00033155145,0.94458354,0.005943917,0.00023913919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029019773,0.00002295337,0.18860506,0.00008547312,0.000010118537,0.0000048010743,0.00033615468,0.000039463353,0.00039079826,0.04888162,0.7612698,0.00006355374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8069992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97228914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8957019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015553179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005247918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4067102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202452705","doi":"10.1080/17441048.2021.1958482","title":"Characterisation and liberative prescription (the limitation of actions) in private international law – Canadian doctrine in the Eswatini courts (the phenomenon of dual cumulation)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Private International Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Supreme court; Phenomenon; Law; Conflict of laws; Dual (grammatical number); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.036954648326038356,"score_gpt":0.31738019525574357,"score_spread":0.2804255469297052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202452705","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9562343,0.000053885982,0.00013627401,0.030043546,0.0007076731,0.00022811437,0.000017605775,0.0000029524394,0.012575651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984692,0.00027290054,0.00018176957,0.0004534839,0.00036018147,0.000008748683,0.000036089736,0.000005621245,0.00021202299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803495,0.00036048662,0.0006927247,0.000111379246,0.0006757759,0.00012466121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981921,0.00034878284,0.000683429,0.00010507653,0.0006279547,0.000042710355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016033241,0.00008756662,0.00015158809,0.0001809121,0.00019555679,0.00012880524,0.00029449194,0.00006323137,0.00011733062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002656387,0.0000608127,0.00006810171,0.00024400091,0.00022574243,0.00081857614,0.000037150352,0.0002568569,0.0000015102335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010120771,0.00014224152,0.013250582,0.000007179613,0.00009059535,0.0000104501105,0.026297506,0.0006257242,0.0040207948,0.952457,0.000042271,0.0029544283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017386335,0.0001436662,0.6479487,0.00024171891,0.000059751317,0.000058672493,0.005520204,0.0020226054,0.0022588125,0.03943668,0.30038404,0.00018651762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011849808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0743838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9130203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025469452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001960529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99473035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402064716","doi":"10.1080/17441048.2024.2377401","title":"The statutory assertion of exclusive jurisdiction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Private International Law","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Statutory law; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Project commissioning; Law and economics; Business; Publishing; Sociology; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.012485881611587318,"score_gpt":0.32562489123676325,"score_spread":0.31313900962517593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402064716","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44160485,0.0017931212,0.014245366,0.037735965,0.026031392,0.00029693218,0.00004375384,0.00007802859,0.47817057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99443394,0.0006339122,0.00024530612,0.0000933715,0.0011803103,0.0000015813599,0.000004061632,0.0000064687,0.0034010292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985254,0.00009763508,0.0004272174,0.00006637566,0.0007880677,0.00009529394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878466,0.00030505715,0.00031591335,0.000049481674,0.0005069545,0.000037938727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009899162,0.000054168802,0.000076158336,0.000098009004,0.00021584192,0.00016183808,0.00032688852,0.000048669077,0.00010220017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016149254,0.000038364324,0.00012986737,0.00010054752,0.00015753713,0.0006486033,0.000026698528,0.00016827227,0.000013504814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046249697,0.000024225445,0.00017966045,0.0000042748734,0.000098160126,0.000008115173,0.0008440797,0.00006465708,0.0025572449,0.9912124,0.00070966606,0.0042512394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000120680335,0.00005461404,0.0015418599,0.000111356945,0.000018619714,0.000010658361,0.00027395727,0.00031050158,0.0030422877,0.0834046,0.91106224,0.00004860318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013502198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012250865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9103526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019770967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017054401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16601034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}