{"meta":{"query_hash":"8293363a27e4","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/8293363a27e4","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Public+Administration+and+Policy+Research"},"results":[{"id":"W2128539743","doi":"10.5897/jpapr.9000058","title":"Water and politics in Africa: The need for regional cooperation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research","topic":"Transboundary Water Resource Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Water scarcity; International trade and water; Water resources; International waters; Geography; Water trading; Water use; Politics; Natural resource economics; Water resource management; Environmental protection; Business; Environmental science; Political science; Water conservation; International trade; Economics; Ecology","score_opus":0.3213317882839748,"score_gpt":0.43652695882267145,"score_spread":0.11519517053869666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128539743","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020800266,0.059619516,0.001981566,0.79280084,0.0015970684,0.000038861777,0.00005576789,0.000042333177,0.12306378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82520086,0.079383366,0.004271357,0.06291436,0.0026366448,0.00012026103,0.00007620906,0.000100965495,0.025296075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913839,0.0046958807,0.00016537793,0.00036200907,0.00076847436,0.0026244065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907697,0.0040564076,0.0008683625,0.0003594052,0.0008344202,0.0031117818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01140195,0.00035285752,0.0005177241,0.0012557206,0.0060382853,0.008900769,0.001086467,0.0051036063,0.012941525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011707036,0.0003184097,0.0004905033,0.0021668237,0.0074062413,0.010947179,0.009507256,0.005497217,0.0009491715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045733268,0.000066181536,0.0035224322,0.00072797167,0.000033516022,0.0014272982,0.017360765,0.00095725665,0.000596939,0.7873973,0.07452073,0.11334393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029149502,0.000056032222,0.005227769,0.0013462799,0.000019436931,0.0005787296,0.034231536,0.0003510504,0.00015925968,0.08317113,0.87479764,0.000031933356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008585522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00977238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012941525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053154817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014851749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060299993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782472865","doi":"10.5897/jpapr2017.0390","title":"The need for executive federalism in federal-provincial relations: The Canadian example","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Technocracy; Democracy; Public administration; Cooperative federalism; Pluralism (philosophy); Sovereignty; Democratic deficit; Sociology; Law; Political economy; Politics","score_opus":0.22571874843512515,"score_gpt":0.4774331538696521,"score_spread":0.25171440543452694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782472865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07886367,0.002690423,0.0022089467,0.15154931,0.00043339602,0.00007778971,0.00021735068,0.00005800229,0.7639011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9514504,0.001610909,0.0011155702,0.00644108,0.000065581386,0.000030563395,0.00006116333,0.000021017397,0.039203726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917203,0.0012651909,0.00009887114,0.0002716063,0.002169436,0.004474733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939971,0.0010663449,0.00021430974,0.00020269532,0.002714489,0.0018050468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003863923,0.0002657051,0.00038344236,0.0017480031,0.03435218,0.0075414786,0.0014222533,0.0028994414,0.006203458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0099466685,0.0001968619,0.00041230515,0.004449446,0.010143446,0.0023282298,0.0035919072,0.0039175055,0.0003461],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003978708,0.000023871276,0.0029417782,0.00005985018,0.000009500165,0.0003855538,0.011794836,0.0007097631,0.00012507835,0.9343071,0.03599741,0.013605474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010160374,0.00003652893,0.018719736,0.00027787773,0.00004943203,0.000294297,0.04882905,0.0025630894,0.00038131652,0.13395102,0.79468507,0.00011105249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9921027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85801196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14198807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22167508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200762504","doi":"10.5897/jpapr.9000023","title":"Evidence of democracy? The relationship between evidence-based policy and democratic government","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Politics; Scholarship; Pride; Public policy; Government (linguistics); Political science; Evidence-based policy; Representative democracy; Law and economics; Public administration; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.8235959125188197,"score_gpt":0.6189331266991814,"score_spread":0.20466278581963826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200762504","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005569915,0.057699874,0.025247738,0.8377828,0.002141724,0.000098813434,0.000067758476,0.000029134804,0.071362175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7974184,0.07146238,0.031381126,0.08512458,0.008773374,0.0006194958,0.00009381048,0.00006637932,0.005060541],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.7375047,0.21459483,0.010925577,0.0069613038,0.024927186,0.005086397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.45630926,0.5005283,0.014678016,0.012211896,0.012633178,0.0036393406],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17277244,0.0008178385,0.0028771372,0.005776316,0.005147312,0.026118303,0.0030267208,0.013327436,0.004856574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32428133,0.00078759686,0.0010322989,0.0062760613,0.071071275,0.033072557,0.013890134,0.02223814,0.0006314887],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030265266,0.000023807119,0.00035294806,0.0003415295,0.00003136587,0.00003731054,0.0010549888,0.000368067,0.000023070514,0.9808941,0.002709133,0.014133307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002827632,0.000029096162,0.0002788732,0.0008988064,0.000014473871,0.00004405502,0.00066010945,0.00024545708,0.00007299485,0.97820926,0.0195021,0.00001635768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028312423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002552154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8272276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012359692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0212825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9137189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}