{"meta":{"query_hash":"8293363a27e4","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/8293363a27e4","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Public+Administration+and+Policy+Research"},"results":[{"id":"W2128539743","doi":"10.5897/jpapr.9000058","title":"Water and politics in Africa: The need for regional cooperation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research","topic":"Transboundary Water Resource Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Water scarcity; International trade and water; Water resources; International waters; Geography; Water trading; Water use; Politics; Natural resource economics; Water resource management; Environmental protection; Business; Environmental science; Political science; Water conservation; International trade; Economics; Ecology","score_opus":0.3213317882839748,"score_gpt":0.43652695882267145,"score_spread":0.11519517053869666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128539743","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62983716,0.00011400179,0.0006197405,0.35068363,0.00005652371,0.0005264598,0.0000043496048,0.000006675148,0.018151483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972471,0.00010223793,0.00014683144,0.00021767495,0.00041409637,0.000010127795,0.0000018229912,0.0000041169906,0.0018560198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857306,0.0004366774,0.00022868182,0.00007083559,0.000372589,0.0003181591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992979,0.0001399559,0.000042556825,0.000057734993,0.00031418668,0.00014765194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004576278,0.000044765096,0.00007503052,0.0003233533,0.0005083464,0.00033095235,0.00014979755,0.000046125246,0.000033680277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002957199,0.00002694955,0.000021828115,0.00021034126,0.00046539897,0.00026711353,0.00002306984,0.00017243222,9.919726e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006910191,0.000085747255,0.0018243778,0.000016408956,0.000016917076,0.0000038712196,0.059673045,2.8727604e-7,0.00010016085,0.93293023,0.002994582,0.0022852484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005693882,0.000426541,0.004540627,0.000009378612,0.0000048270367,0.000016414344,0.011649943,0.0000384898,0.00013161477,0.021699972,0.9608569,0.00005590985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032591168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011066936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9578623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006391357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050276925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39098412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782472865","doi":"10.5897/jpapr2017.0390","title":"The need for executive federalism in federal-provincial relations: The Canadian example","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; Political science; Technocracy; Democracy; Public administration; Cooperative federalism; Pluralism (philosophy); Sovereignty; Democratic deficit; Sociology; Law; Political economy; Politics","score_opus":0.22571874843512515,"score_gpt":0.4774331538696521,"score_spread":0.25171440543452694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782472865","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09428149,0.00015387083,0.00003943314,0.81719625,0.00021289362,0.00050222187,0.000025116135,0.000002521386,0.08758619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862384,0.00008216323,0.000016800435,0.00028444704,0.0014497957,0.000019204517,6.447778e-7,0.0000037096484,0.011904805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981068,0.0005173084,0.00027785913,0.00007630196,0.0005360494,0.00048570638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977299,0.0009878888,0.00022214605,0.00014606434,0.00055689394,0.00035708534],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007648822,0.000048351612,0.00009300917,0.000108990855,0.008355688,0.0027358925,0.0004523811,0.000089258836,0.000010258236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011573777,0.000028682594,0.00004422702,0.00013237959,0.00072466413,0.00045627585,0.000027819753,0.00033376034,0.0000022376619],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016545688,0.00000904708,0.0055206097,0.0000018403628,0.0000058172477,0.000002377546,0.0016546759,5.6965707e-8,0.0000024124502,0.97615176,0.01407107,0.00256378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027171048,0.00009064843,0.08304094,0.0000120396835,8.900366e-7,0.0000064902224,0.0024427727,0.000023734987,0.0000034969269,0.045802597,0.86826706,0.000037646685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7047698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9744173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9303492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004217938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00791786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99829936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200762504","doi":"10.5897/jpapr.9000023","title":"Evidence of democracy? The relationship between evidence-based policy and democratic government","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Politics; Scholarship; Pride; Public policy; Government (linguistics); Political science; Evidence-based policy; Representative democracy; Law and economics; Public administration; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.8235959125188197,"score_gpt":0.6189331266991814,"score_spread":0.20466278581963826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200762504","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82532656,0.0006968448,0.002422034,0.16880219,0.000048293346,0.00027459415,0.000006753259,0.0000037920158,0.0024189167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99713326,0.0003642174,0.0007134271,0.00036355417,0.00040878673,0.0000064509304,3.928399e-7,0.0000057643224,0.0010041517],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920345,0.002124088,0.0012450699,0.00019827898,0.0041026315,0.00029543918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97630364,0.020122917,0.00096231484,0.00043839603,0.0017748044,0.00039794383],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.032119036,0.00011023554,0.00025561347,0.00070626446,0.000471026,0.00040420637,0.0006355458,0.0000846967,0.0002448208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07009803,0.0000646511,0.00007913236,0.0016253977,0.0005308448,0.0016036241,0.00011268559,0.00046957657,0.000011352818],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014293064,0.00006799484,0.88744646,0.000035534977,0.00001990764,0.0000022341956,0.001174523,0.000002255583,0.00014901411,0.07793478,0.001600631,0.03142371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003344351,0.0012949764,0.932996,0.00023031369,0.000015447906,0.00003604526,0.0013375741,0.00053384865,0.0005898885,0.061358366,0.0012003244,0.000072820294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005150225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006782653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17180668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015806043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049326997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}