{"meta":{"query_hash":"a328f3bb62c2","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering"},"cohort_total":66,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":66,"exported":66,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a328f3bb62c2","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Quality+in+Maintenance+Engineering"},"results":[{"id":"W1528964841","doi":"10.1108/jqme-11-2013-0074","title":"A nearly optimal inspection policy for a two-component series system","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability engineering; Context (archaeology); Component (thermodynamics); Sequence (biology); Series (stratigraphy); Condition-based maintenance; Function (biology); Engineering; Preventive maintenance; Set (abstract data type); Total cost; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics","score_opus":0.019920589644512533,"score_gpt":0.27051747991665154,"score_spread":0.250596890272139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1528964841","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26534536,0.0003306806,0.7297705,0.00020708686,0.000032339198,0.00013154482,0.00008433429,0.0003622083,0.0037360482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96729106,0.00008899415,0.03139181,0.000024453911,0.000011082046,0.00003866701,0.000046037214,0.000022084432,0.0010858759],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948514,0.0001240672,0.000025401703,0.00013334151,0.0001302688,0.00010187024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988857,0.00046680597,0.0003018531,0.00007177288,0.00018893376,0.000084860214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008615296,0.0007431152,0.0008311523,0.0007646938,0.0003908424,0.000804071,0.00055897626,0.0007494547,0.0014914364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022860647,0.00042654484,0.00050568086,0.0003689646,0.00062058197,0.0006187691,0.0004386787,0.0006396896,0.000177029],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001666991,0.00008413423,0.0010622999,0.000086917935,0.000022118475,0.00011251181,0.000048067934,0.9698359,0.010230142,0.0036629066,0.0002896864,0.014398662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008793018,0.00011864408,0.00046329084,0.0000055191376,0.00001114971,0.000039756975,0.000014958841,0.996405,0.0011315683,0.0016577143,0.00013846593,0.0000051678185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041457573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028054134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041457573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013089585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012848373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009497225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1578655672","doi":"10.1108/jqme-02-2013-0006","title":"Reliability analysis of underground mining equipment using genetic algorithms","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Reliability engineering; Engineering; Automation; Genetic algorithm; Set (abstract data type); Productivity; Data mining; Computer science; Machine learning","score_opus":0.0224425929351243,"score_gpt":0.3181979007979365,"score_spread":0.2957553078628122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1578655672","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32519245,0.00039152434,0.6678572,0.00029008935,0.00003172389,0.00011399974,0.00019217278,0.0011629737,0.0047678323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86401737,0.00013920435,0.13423607,0.00003668667,0.000013288198,0.00011430855,0.00022377456,0.000057599656,0.0011617241],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997284,0.00010301289,0.000013396295,0.000049983522,0.00007773404,0.000027572216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982967,0.0012028412,0.0001770003,0.000051502062,0.00024773928,0.0000242469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009136412,0.0006265978,0.0005586921,0.0012918174,0.00029626285,0.00048266517,0.0007172734,0.0006364386,0.0010436956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030789315,0.00029486127,0.00067577814,0.0007504434,0.00037104925,0.00029373472,0.00031766534,0.00046217363,0.00011808337],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010495074,0.000016898684,0.0011794253,0.000012963321,0.000012560347,0.000018327752,0.0000137466195,0.98875964,0.00036726045,0.0005193848,0.00008153661,0.009007764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016387095,0.0000079739,0.00015165216,0.0000020736377,0.000002462447,0.000003530759,0.0000029011562,0.9993273,0.00011956844,0.00032951092,0.00005036293,9.873295e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013807638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007358331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013807638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011276959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011084129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027454495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1878151390","doi":"10.1108/jqme-05-2013-0030","title":"Human factors engineering in aircraft maintenance: a review","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Occupational Health and Safety Research","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Civil Aviation Organization","funders":"","keywords":"Aviation; Aircraft maintenance; Engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Systems engineering; Aviation accident; Construction engineering; Transport engineering; Engineering management; Aeronautics; Business","score_opus":0.23395901901936386,"score_gpt":0.5411481027209928,"score_spread":0.3071890837016289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1878151390","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020273247,0.99879694,0.000101903344,0.00028370132,0.00012281777,0.000014282243,0.000025336303,0.0000033059914,0.0004489691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014478869,0.9979242,0.00019379017,0.00017821588,0.000097200726,0.000021038259,0.00002656033,0.000001223229,0.000109861394],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984642,0.0004677023,0.00038752038,0.00017581205,0.00042517457,0.000079512836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98990834,0.007914743,0.00076630636,0.00008727881,0.0011764041,0.00014692533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00221176,0.0012704028,0.002075171,0.0072405604,0.00070502283,0.0022908528,0.0012340319,0.0016937461,0.004787402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007030119,0.00048224488,0.0018624061,0.0071734474,0.0006959312,0.0021931431,0.00092599477,0.0013645699,0.0008864504],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011072137,0.000113261915,0.0014809284,0.2610221,0.00062907115,0.0005819666,0.00076216325,0.0004010114,0.0004724943,0.002392105,0.022981973,0.70905226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004336277,0.00038756445,0.012964291,0.37205774,0.0034597842,0.0035184496,0.0014735596,0.00029847608,0.00047755695,0.0024501754,0.60276794,0.000101100006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005587291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008909585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072405604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016758078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063326084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01601547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963898649","doi":"10.1108/13552510610654510","title":"Human error in maintenance: a review","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Quality and Safety in Healthcare","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":194,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Human error; Listing (finance); Risk analysis (engineering); Human reliability; Originality; Order (exchange); Reliability (semiconductor); Human resources; Value (mathematics); Engineering; Reliability engineering; Computer science; Business; Management; Psychology","score_opus":0.23900067830948088,"score_gpt":0.5429668015626707,"score_spread":0.30396612325318983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963898649","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000108816486,0.99937576,0.000044061664,0.00016020497,0.00009318101,0.000006417672,0.000008626661,0.000002184338,0.00020077867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009783105,0.9986394,0.000102332786,0.00010030967,0.000084673986,0.000010025013,0.000009786099,6.5916e-7,0.00007449435],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982659,0.00044849166,0.0003977135,0.00017683473,0.0006340678,0.000076991535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924305,0.0051920493,0.0009116086,0.000086787135,0.0012360393,0.00014303622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021848725,0.001122685,0.0026328582,0.0062300307,0.00055181637,0.0018768832,0.0016268936,0.002189472,0.0038463494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067377454,0.0005593544,0.0011933134,0.006885714,0.0007460571,0.0024946528,0.00087873125,0.0011704398,0.0010331903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013553191,0.00009443074,0.0012542863,0.14500275,0.00047779718,0.00071906665,0.0003192839,0.00037844662,0.00039831628,0.0010484658,0.02195075,0.8282208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009355702,0.00053593173,0.012629319,0.23759617,0.0027125324,0.00830561,0.001097134,0.00036607,0.000690061,0.0021567382,0.7337258,0.00009102714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045570247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070711905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062300307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001241124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046980265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0128673315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968862017","doi":"10.1108/13552510510601339","title":"Artificial neural networks for reliability maximization under budget and weight constraints","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Artificial neural network; Mathematical optimization; Maximization; Computer science; Integer programming; Computation; Linear programming; Hopfield network; Power (physics); Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.013196477595588486,"score_gpt":0.24687446208759473,"score_spread":0.23367798449200625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968862017","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025208537,0.000877101,0.96879756,0.00038422266,0.000034937322,0.000029478537,0.000036297555,0.00013992519,0.0044920114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80902845,0.001336526,0.18265201,0.00013273182,0.00010738079,0.00019195839,0.00010080145,0.00006633038,0.0063839117],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996352,0.00016391832,0.00001776367,0.000047454025,0.00010078788,0.00003486323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991868,0.0005706964,0.00008132414,0.000025872365,0.000118260046,0.00001693337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011511779,0.00047504852,0.0005159407,0.00042920437,0.00020712159,0.0005326074,0.0006434421,0.0008612087,0.0014190888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034021307,0.0003076568,0.00029687586,0.0006662139,0.00050355174,0.00102797,0.0004928018,0.0008521026,0.00014939372],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023004646,0.0000134798765,0.00014247416,0.000045650657,0.000014765633,0.000018254492,0.000017891773,0.9647919,0.0007740953,0.014174902,0.00038821768,0.019595321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030030337,0.000005254804,0.000027115366,0.0000035194569,0.0000024191297,0.0000031184825,0.0000018640588,0.9955577,0.00016229099,0.0040887264,0.00014366467,0.0000013353372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029280277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030874265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029280277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009365924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073442026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0067955256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976084415","doi":"10.1108/eum0000000006007","title":"Optimizing a mine haul truck wheel motors’ condition monitoring program Use of proportional hazards modeling","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"PricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada); University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Truck; Engineering; Work (physics); Automotive engineering; Reliability engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.03870898229259323,"score_gpt":0.33736793804282655,"score_spread":0.2986589557502333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976084415","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3937236,0.00008676408,0.603231,0.00026962132,0.000009757058,0.00028763857,0.00016276985,0.00069235096,0.0015364845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9187649,0.00003917024,0.08034079,0.000020923075,0.000004093034,0.00009370251,0.0001211499,0.000020012461,0.00059537176],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.998858,0.00059855153,0.000038740058,0.00016548467,0.000209705,0.00012966651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965037,0.0026807077,0.00026826555,0.00014105356,0.00033482286,0.00007147422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037844595,0.00054316415,0.0006258633,0.0005076192,0.00033108352,0.0007112103,0.00075310445,0.0003375169,0.0007919076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006611183,0.00041663705,0.00047576454,0.00035217564,0.00025546586,0.0005747941,0.00050598464,0.0005901716,0.000093334245],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016017308,0.00012799518,0.007116872,0.000028420422,0.000046514528,0.000033266344,0.000058050133,0.94703054,0.0015666267,0.00094297045,0.00017063413,0.042717986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013827341,0.000065795226,0.0011021281,0.0000013730383,0.000012211993,0.000005968975,0.000013306886,0.9971576,0.0011480357,0.00034015454,0.00013575559,0.0000038996973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032525126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024642082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032525126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014114792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002598622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064671636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977484917","doi":"10.1108/13552510110695574","title":"Reliability analysis of triple modular computer systems with redundant voters and restricted maintenance","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Redundancy (engineering); Triple modular redundancy; Modular design; Reliability engineering; Mean time between failures; Reliability (semiconductor); Computer science; Engineering; Failure rate; Operating system; Physics","score_opus":0.011545792396580433,"score_gpt":0.23296035213612992,"score_spread":0.2214145597395495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977484917","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48812735,0.0004964847,0.50416595,0.00024554928,0.000037666403,0.000046115703,0.00009912605,0.00017530084,0.0066065947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99335045,0.00013352807,0.0056129643,0.000010697166,0.000009402694,0.000023522849,0.000022913191,0.000010098091,0.00082641904],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99975806,0.00008380499,0.0000073829915,0.000026411988,0.00006549123,0.000058798352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989753,0.0006018715,0.00017253532,0.000078420766,0.00012143869,0.00005046801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061610655,0.00043804932,0.0004109222,0.00046286843,0.00020760085,0.0004825065,0.0005367389,0.00038408552,0.0010447074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019573057,0.00023318853,0.00067757344,0.00025809894,0.0006711659,0.00068848336,0.0004788908,0.0005721786,0.00012293982],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005972098,0.000012407425,0.00047884547,0.00002159735,0.000014564385,0.00007576436,0.000050857394,0.97149414,0.002164223,0.02245507,0.00015495629,0.003017808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038399717,0.000033333556,0.0001766292,0.000003088946,0.0000061277137,0.000022216944,0.0000067945953,0.99411666,0.00031675526,0.0052028825,0.000107115804,0.0000045494153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019292285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010478128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0019292285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000622706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042465786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004518032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977513378","doi":"10.1108/13552511111157371","title":"Simulation‐based approach to joint production and preventive maintenance scheduling on a failure‐prone machine","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms","field":"Engineering","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Preventive maintenance; Tardiness; Corrective maintenance; Scheduling (production processes); Production (economics); Maintenance actions; Operations research; Due date; Computer science; Reliability engineering; Proactive maintenance; Context (archaeology); Operations management; Job shop scheduling; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Business; Schedule; Economics","score_opus":0.03720795776466069,"score_gpt":0.2596485919597839,"score_spread":0.22244063419512322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977513378","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.085114054,0.00030779417,0.90645945,0.00030317836,0.00006109889,0.000116725365,0.00011453453,0.00032477255,0.0071983156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91690713,0.0003515569,0.078097425,0.00004852591,0.000029344814,0.00024564957,0.0001427305,0.000036231446,0.004141567],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995472,0.00022997134,0.000018176856,0.000056705878,0.00009013429,0.000057794306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990946,0.00055348914,0.00012536401,0.00005203709,0.00011952122,0.000054834054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007318677,0.00059470267,0.0008420544,0.00051625626,0.00035961423,0.0009348526,0.0012247552,0.00090466696,0.0025637567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015908547,0.0005015755,0.0010116464,0.0004085746,0.00073171634,0.00063186703,0.00056701375,0.00077325926,0.00021043254],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011714082,0.000009494371,0.000095116855,0.0000061563906,0.00000910135,0.00001330152,0.0000076161464,0.9968886,0.00015581195,0.0021763768,0.000023161565,0.0006035059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005513276,0.000009871697,0.00003443147,0.0000015927525,0.0000036991269,0.000002833691,0.0000017996034,0.9989089,0.00006181101,0.000837467,0.00013047634,0.0000016378858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00983356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055812644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00983356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012381326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018827942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019552648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978626708","doi":"10.1108/jqme-10-2012-0035","title":"Optimal lockout/tagout, preventive maintenance, human error and production policies of manufacturing systems with passive redundancy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"","keywords":"Preventive maintenance; Reliability engineering; Corrective maintenance; Maintenance actions; Redundancy (engineering); Engineering; Markov chain; Production (economics); Operations research; Computer science","score_opus":0.009276134657986743,"score_gpt":0.24030392307087436,"score_spread":0.23102778841288762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978626708","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2403553,0.0013814383,0.7507758,0.0005460241,0.000047989466,0.00021033164,0.00022967074,0.00020015816,0.006253261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98554796,0.0003220565,0.011920593,0.000022955692,0.0000143948455,0.000087640634,0.000055670225,0.000017662855,0.002011038],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990963,0.0003724024,0.000029448962,0.00016453375,0.00015451299,0.00018288982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965252,0.0023165208,0.0007273999,0.00006945437,0.00023733637,0.00012401362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019027096,0.0012708808,0.0011487139,0.0007544776,0.00043821495,0.0011301769,0.00091209915,0.0010945273,0.0021670826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049162456,0.0008081563,0.00081981765,0.0004528942,0.0011567,0.0008959182,0.0007195614,0.0009007341,0.00017624834],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065433014,0.000023744531,0.0005330621,0.000057901925,0.000017110522,0.00007892381,0.000033717828,0.994406,0.00065604475,0.0020283614,0.00008405837,0.0020156787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000109387,0.00007746901,0.0005631991,0.00001288245,0.00002035556,0.000018265215,0.000022408803,0.9969139,0.00043667242,0.0018062125,0.00011055031,0.0000071205823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0108026415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054994253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0108026415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001638108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017944633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021479487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991467588","doi":"10.1108/13552510910997751","title":"Production control of hybrid repair and remanufacturing systems under general conditions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Sustainable Supply Chain Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Remanufacturing; Production (economics); Exponential distribution; Control (management); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Point (geometry); Reliability engineering; Variety (cybernetics); Process (computing); Exponential function; Variable (mathematics); Operations research; Inventory control; Industrial engineering; Engineering; Manufacturing engineering; Mathematics; Economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.011473470588539224,"score_gpt":0.23826936292138964,"score_spread":0.2267958923328504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991467588","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24627262,0.00048435378,0.741089,0.00017944675,0.00004758404,0.00010215046,0.00011783836,0.00049229857,0.0112146055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99415344,0.000061588486,0.004691594,0.00000916059,0.000004197477,0.000020005917,0.0000190686,0.000007718929,0.001033298],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994843,0.0001315349,0.000024081593,0.00014938384,0.000108605804,0.00010200684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990526,0.00046367408,0.00028461684,0.000053319185,0.000119747565,0.000026071508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010026676,0.0005794982,0.00057872105,0.00039100827,0.00033387155,0.00097312604,0.00062512053,0.00037293177,0.0018585338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018191627,0.00026695468,0.00045082587,0.0002987381,0.0006146427,0.0006114452,0.00058766257,0.00034477448,0.00015311645],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004639634,0.000020343174,0.00027828038,0.00003633604,0.000011660931,0.000064906606,0.000032071337,0.9886285,0.0021779235,0.0026911483,0.0000831826,0.005929194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045932907,0.000045655517,0.0002682469,0.0000026608807,0.0000061553533,0.000011988983,0.000010706244,0.99808085,0.0006032762,0.0008188789,0.0001440374,0.000002948238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065796156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030353868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065796156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093985384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006159598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0130826235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991651351","doi":"10.1108/13552510410526839","title":"Maintenance management – an AHP application for centralization/decentralization","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Decentralization; Process (computing); Process management; Organizational structure; Management science; Engineering; Operations research; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Operations management; Business; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.010508687688687719,"score_gpt":0.2572392669741839,"score_spread":0.24673057928549622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991651351","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038892247,0.000054874556,0.99265844,0.00010823382,0.000028780758,0.0003418673,0.00013370677,0.0012651806,0.0015197096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0785977,0.00007129298,0.9194502,0.00003785302,0.000020412463,0.0006691537,0.00020742745,0.00015195919,0.0007940666],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765503,0.001055932,0.00020894488,0.00021392884,0.0007394936,0.00012656166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975871,0.0013880873,0.00018416415,0.00017535532,0.000589096,0.00007607661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068982923,0.0011095252,0.0012462385,0.0023428684,0.0016182577,0.0017180805,0.0016048874,0.00097426336,0.005741442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007214544,0.00087227486,0.0013123795,0.002433135,0.00061388017,0.0012196649,0.0018738009,0.0017653982,0.0008397299],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003231115,0.00032386673,0.0015507238,0.0007127056,0.00034390876,0.00026862157,0.0012334618,0.5220001,0.0055493875,0.0379063,0.0070525263,0.42273527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008491274,0.000053335898,0.00023970813,0.000061743056,0.00003843693,0.0000378996,0.00014559389,0.97656745,0.0014470387,0.016408809,0.0048918016,0.000023235578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053679147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004571915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068982923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001349399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021952572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036482155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994121331","doi":"10.1108/13552510310493738","title":"Availability modeling and optimization of reconfigurable manufacturing systems","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Optimization and Packing Problems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","funders":"","keywords":"Control reconfiguration; Mathematical optimization; Integer programming; Linear programming; Computer science; Production (economics); Reliability engineering; Component (thermodynamics); Failure rate; Basis (linear algebra); Stochastic programming; Robust optimization; Engineering; Mathematics; Embedded system","score_opus":0.02289221077093223,"score_gpt":0.23764739873515703,"score_spread":0.2147551879642248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994121331","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08719852,0.0009763129,0.903773,0.00035481114,0.000038040078,0.000039073937,0.0001483233,0.00026082987,0.0072110146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9727366,0.0005327556,0.023094203,0.000033108317,0.000032784443,0.000092515766,0.00010609787,0.000048514314,0.0033233478],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994017,0.00022185424,0.000022967453,0.00009236063,0.00016179337,0.000099349636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992957,0.0004131916,0.00016903647,0.00003121078,0.000059649094,0.000031171985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007695789,0.0008082538,0.00080032536,0.00067587185,0.00029665572,0.0008881476,0.0006753445,0.0009089035,0.0011931288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018471393,0.000570785,0.00080237444,0.000565228,0.00079897774,0.0007094486,0.0005755002,0.0005591646,0.0002005711],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072797684,0.000003392294,0.00006885169,0.0000075069433,0.0000042048496,0.000011839863,0.000004100357,0.9966169,0.00021738942,0.0023521446,0.00003155072,0.0006749394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023961798,0.0000063870407,0.00007855329,0.0000015097103,0.0000016988851,0.000004278592,0.0000021454691,0.9979121,0.0000913993,0.0018079873,0.00008992533,0.0000016204398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005563297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002266235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005563297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010475741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006260701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011061788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996204213","doi":"10.1108/13552510110407087","title":"Genetic algorithms for reliability assessment of mining equipment","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Reliability engineering; Genetic algorithm; Computer science; Algorithm; Engineering; Machine learning","score_opus":0.022284099874276618,"score_gpt":0.30768453870495727,"score_spread":0.28540043883068067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996204213","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010179212,0.001886888,0.98280084,0.0003913989,0.000049529386,0.00006286283,0.00008350042,0.00035661634,0.004189036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33772862,0.0028472377,0.6522561,0.0002218803,0.00018793043,0.00044232633,0.00038546257,0.00018374079,0.005746795],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951947,0.00024716125,0.000022603692,0.000065020606,0.0001142674,0.00003144785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860317,0.0010670712,0.00008004786,0.000047640566,0.00018100721,0.000021028454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016713246,0.0009790387,0.0008949729,0.0015221005,0.00041601554,0.0009659238,0.0010409391,0.0013180777,0.001840842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005096604,0.00042826665,0.00071608496,0.001269321,0.00064416125,0.00084866927,0.0005085054,0.0011131221,0.0003942312],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000112562675,0.000012934663,0.00029688448,0.000027912294,0.00003141039,0.000015779277,0.00002104595,0.94834816,0.00014579945,0.014853635,0.0006296909,0.035605464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068367244,0.0000089244595,0.00008604833,0.0000143708785,0.000007037041,0.000007451575,0.000005496208,0.9815097,0.00008797909,0.01735428,0.0009077639,0.000004170828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055932337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012651647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00099225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0142912865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000625936","doi":"10.1108/13552510510616478","title":"Fuzzy set‐valued and grey filtering statistical inferences on a system operating data","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Schedule; Reliability engineering; Fuzzy logic; Probabilistic logic; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Fuzzy set; Failure rate; Function (biology); Operations research; Production (economics); Product (mathematics); Industrial engineering; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.040525353149743,"score_gpt":0.2963117320154809,"score_spread":0.2557863788657379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000625936","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25953674,0.00031421456,0.7341248,0.0006490962,0.000063640524,0.00008082081,0.0007133824,0.00036134088,0.0041559692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96838254,0.00023752071,0.030128941,0.000057750185,0.00004024955,0.00004430078,0.00039105315,0.00001269534,0.0007048868],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984439,0.00057609106,0.000110173736,0.00032967678,0.00044970584,0.000090495516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99226135,0.0060337614,0.0006501245,0.00044361324,0.0005369584,0.00007424827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003816089,0.00042940123,0.000663469,0.0020078525,0.00038401486,0.0015757049,0.00061633653,0.00071999186,0.0016797467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017857851,0.0002674869,0.0008870148,0.001417682,0.00074698403,0.0019072926,0.00044965866,0.0009530435,0.00029507637],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027060768,0.00010277634,0.019956747,0.00023220897,0.0002538267,0.00039232327,0.0006196236,0.78716195,0.0054786014,0.04618612,0.0016460862,0.13769908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061969813,0.00004945758,0.0074395095,0.000028527027,0.0000314085,0.00003559973,0.000071476796,0.9715146,0.0010633257,0.01914956,0.0005838776,0.000026403903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009295181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051072445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009295181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015857205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080179016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020181596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002768319","doi":"10.1108/13552510910997715","title":"Feasibility study of using statistical process control to optimize quality assurance in radiotherapy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre d'expertise et de recherche en infrastructures urbaines","funders":"","keywords":"Quality assurance; Statistical process control; Control chart; Reliability (semiconductor); Reliability engineering; Quality (philosophy); Computer science; Process (computing); Head and neck; Control (management); Radiation therapy; Medicine; Medical physics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Surgery","score_opus":0.02742654696187762,"score_gpt":0.38650701569890605,"score_spread":0.3590804687370284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002768319","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.268449,0.00038385214,0.7249415,0.00022328702,0.00005926755,0.0011170224,0.00007330553,0.0008632788,0.0038896163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8267249,0.00007436461,0.17255305,0.000030122135,0.000025044988,0.00027545352,0.000057611025,0.000041847252,0.0002176373],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9683004,0.01951059,0.001042782,0.001679971,0.009048804,0.00041738816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92208606,0.052206807,0.007931086,0.006147503,0.011240865,0.00038767065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028837169,0.0006680249,0.0004724782,0.0014647082,0.00050845015,0.0014837692,0.0010711999,0.00043841926,0.0008240184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06167299,0.00024317535,0.00047216646,0.0013009995,0.0010761039,0.0011785221,0.00077283056,0.0007138766,0.00012359075],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033575424,0.00202217,0.058907535,0.0008424692,0.00025054096,0.00017007346,0.0013458768,0.124998435,0.06385147,0.02694702,0.0012008146,0.7161061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057742593,0.01418789,0.03817912,0.00015158404,0.00029930676,0.00021395601,0.00044313777,0.8196625,0.109767966,0.010951513,0.005438943,0.0001266334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002153531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096781965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028837169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011579274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031392467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15250736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002779342","doi":"10.1108/13552510710829498","title":"Availability analysis of a generalized maintainable three‐state device parallel system with human error and common‐cause failures","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Redundancy (engineering); Reliability engineering; Common cause failure; Human error; Computer science; Reliability (semiconductor); Failure mode and effects analysis; State (computer science); Markov chain; Engineering; Common cause and special cause; Distributed computing; Algorithm; Operations management","score_opus":0.01860619051724609,"score_gpt":0.27286155454051225,"score_spread":0.25425536402326615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002779342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72882587,0.00018765882,0.26734057,0.00012507057,0.000021507874,0.00005585032,0.00014481111,0.00030247774,0.0029960398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99744093,0.00003528841,0.0019858324,0.0000044875737,0.0000030417016,0.000014855071,0.000023036964,0.0000055287974,0.00048694154],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996886,0.00006643578,0.000015056896,0.000090153924,0.00009022497,0.000049554757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998831,0.00052741007,0.0002865375,0.00010827429,0.00020902227,0.00003784415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005379492,0.00037843725,0.00048737373,0.00037667237,0.00035999375,0.0005381472,0.0005592414,0.0003531072,0.0015992449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014473695,0.00019415445,0.000554066,0.00026831805,0.00058037514,0.0005467489,0.00049960695,0.0003508541,0.00012763364],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013817419,0.000025848367,0.0023463303,0.000061610306,0.00004479946,0.00028881803,0.000102434286,0.97841805,0.009366955,0.002987635,0.00013411677,0.0060852272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043279047,0.000051395167,0.0013913203,0.000002078935,0.000013909494,0.000039833565,0.000023271457,0.99677867,0.0007592617,0.0008402366,0.00009141598,0.0000043802406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008334348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035548953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008334348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007747687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006023418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016571641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020088934","doi":"10.1108/13552511111157399","title":"Maintenance/production planning with interactive feedback of product quality","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Production (economics); Quality (philosophy); Product (mathematics); Control (management); Preventive maintenance; Maintenance actions; Point (geometry); Reliability engineering; Value (mathematics); Operations research; Computer science; Originality; Production planning; Optimal maintenance; Engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Economics; Mathematics; Business","score_opus":0.029699906106271972,"score_gpt":0.2635196073782785,"score_spread":0.23381970127200655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020088934","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06733309,0.00023607563,0.9250598,0.00027736722,0.000040465235,0.00009982153,0.00012560202,0.00027456958,0.006553199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9676976,0.00017357034,0.027270561,0.000036998983,0.000021409101,0.00011436283,0.000056846995,0.00002980398,0.0045987153],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904996,0.00023428453,0.00003181155,0.0002432531,0.00031560694,0.00012508062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999213,0.00034285054,0.00022569657,0.00005583596,0.0001188988,0.000043664444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009800484,0.0007773645,0.0008591061,0.00044657517,0.00030113984,0.0011396533,0.0011485908,0.0006885881,0.002751126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021680766,0.00046961513,0.00079140405,0.00036077385,0.00092019915,0.00096235605,0.00065106,0.0009528424,0.00026801557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046015433,0.000032431555,0.0003119848,0.000033910048,0.0000106632115,0.00004286264,0.000026619224,0.9859768,0.0014236217,0.005664391,0.00012620578,0.0063044187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007922597,0.00004682777,0.00018654027,0.000003950707,0.0000085558795,0.000009750669,0.000005344786,0.99710804,0.0003919329,0.0020207695,0.00020501825,0.0000052722808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007835793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042825253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007835793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015093308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015343066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015580416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022687135","doi":"10.1108/13552510310493747","title":"Probabilistic safety analysis of maintainable systems","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Risk and Safety Analysis","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability engineering; Probabilistic logic; Reliability (semiconductor); Failure mode and effects analysis; Mode (computer interface); Common cause failure; Computer science; Engineering; Statistical model; State (computer science); Common cause and special cause; Operations management; Algorithm","score_opus":0.05879644741064032,"score_gpt":0.3584788640851771,"score_spread":0.29968241667453677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022687135","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025193568,0.00041392955,0.9703664,0.00043996013,0.00002322429,0.000024270888,0.00009750405,0.00016006081,0.0032811326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9235772,0.0010661195,0.0711946,0.000113408794,0.00014208637,0.00021612324,0.0002784382,0.00007736508,0.0033346023],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971769,0.00080381526,0.000099292534,0.00025370333,0.0014438006,0.00022254275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900281,0.0072929002,0.0011346359,0.00041426835,0.0009730625,0.00015697737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002767034,0.00084207003,0.00071277947,0.0015293085,0.0005070988,0.0012274319,0.0015894853,0.00093575084,0.0018727937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013917212,0.0005570902,0.0010041451,0.00066446094,0.0015119108,0.002393445,0.0010572996,0.0012516732,0.00025045048],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025396848,0.00001994511,0.0005662465,0.000048242437,0.000035282974,0.000061285165,0.00009843963,0.804384,0.0010185407,0.18369734,0.00046170055,0.009583551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062668355,0.000016686303,0.0001726507,0.0000071241957,0.000010951539,0.000027115764,0.000008871804,0.93793863,0.00033636388,0.060817152,0.00065001013,0.0000082218085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003338444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011998696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003338444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015702783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012496718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014633715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022726105","doi":"10.1108/13552510810861932","title":"Optimal disassembly sequencing strategy using constraint programming approach","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Manufacturing Process and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical optimization; Maintainability; Computer science; Constraint programming; Process (computing); Linear programming; Engineering; Reliability engineering; Algorithm; Stochastic programming; Mathematics","score_opus":0.049980870288825564,"score_gpt":0.2713092925294812,"score_spread":0.22132842224065566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022726105","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068381876,0.00040442924,0.9831935,0.00013215408,0.000022387556,0.0001965855,0.00015367672,0.0001620276,0.008897078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16938233,0.0011142879,0.81952095,0.0001395652,0.000033614724,0.0006844692,0.00060576247,0.00017368507,0.008345411],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991003,0.0002505123,0.000046744335,0.00021434482,0.00026385766,0.00012429709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934417,0.00034512518,0.000086664106,0.000030712683,0.00015393792,0.00003940801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008910151,0.00192992,0.0011656737,0.0019590687,0.00065287,0.0018599853,0.0018208607,0.00092044956,0.006709527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014610967,0.000879833,0.0014783378,0.00203295,0.00059684366,0.0011875705,0.0008262399,0.0012186029,0.0007819579],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056712153,0.00008765032,0.0003379372,0.00029091266,0.0000480785,0.00017058739,0.000084646534,0.9073579,0.0023389985,0.03258889,0.0014985702,0.055139102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012597996,0.000046043817,0.00009330202,0.00003884277,0.00001694494,0.000047637513,0.000033687695,0.9847933,0.0011047313,0.010888079,0.0029120536,0.000012818297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01258435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009582194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01258435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018703698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031172896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025022209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027134703","doi":"10.1108/13552511111157362","title":"Production control of unreliable manufacturing systems producing defective items","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Supply Chain and Inventory Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure; Université Laval; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Production (economics); Discrete event simulation; Reliability engineering; Control (management); Production line; Computer science; Exponential function; Intersection (aeronautics); Product (mathematics); Production manager; Industrial engineering; Event (particle physics); Productivity; Operations research; Engineering; Mathematics; Simulation; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.031342669841227876,"score_gpt":0.22441484321620195,"score_spread":0.19307217337497407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027134703","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17815788,0.0004201303,0.8169699,0.00026332273,0.000043626183,0.00008928407,0.000056135104,0.00022427503,0.0037755407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99193394,0.00009580031,0.0072067473,0.000012716139,0.000008355878,0.000025734385,0.000013630241,0.000011941219,0.00069112756],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873096,0.00051611295,0.000058584268,0.00016863526,0.0003584309,0.00016718193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962941,0.0017140427,0.001191684,0.00024619012,0.00044566157,0.0001083763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018245991,0.00075095595,0.0008242787,0.00055173587,0.0004651725,0.0014050584,0.0011246026,0.00040013378,0.0012377634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049058106,0.00034435795,0.00044124617,0.00038896184,0.0012668292,0.0006937638,0.000881439,0.00061459554,0.00014817435],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007694237,0.000026290283,0.0006967192,0.00007314741,0.000015378924,0.00011022422,0.00005777079,0.9823069,0.0027897435,0.0054180943,0.0001274782,0.008301226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012802119,0.00011532792,0.00035122116,0.000009035551,0.000013325893,0.000021953214,0.000020082753,0.9937937,0.0013135395,0.0040464997,0.00029488295,0.000007660938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040167836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012913961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0040167836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010866045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010233076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009649515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031614523","doi":"10.1108/13552511311315968","title":"Risk based integrity modeling of offshore process components suffering stochastic degradation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability engineering; Component (thermodynamics); Process (computing); Degradation (telecommunications); Gamma process; Computer science; Submarine pipeline; Bayesian probability; Stochastic process; Engineering; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.022439706228943312,"score_gpt":0.254651612657843,"score_spread":0.23221190642889966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031614523","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11961094,0.0005510975,0.8699455,0.00039980598,0.000033991902,0.00008201816,0.00022169204,0.00020638367,0.008948596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775808,0.00037374542,0.01603389,0.000042833577,0.00001811159,0.00010557916,0.00015403192,0.000055261386,0.0056358124],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990088,0.00026135103,0.00004742533,0.00018681138,0.00036026494,0.00013535444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983808,0.000687642,0.0004480422,0.00010100413,0.00032885582,0.000053627846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016050227,0.0009532406,0.0009718261,0.00086262345,0.00041327413,0.0014275074,0.0015484587,0.0014343037,0.0015545586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038521013,0.0006352218,0.0010411865,0.0005238551,0.0011700412,0.0014390567,0.0010468783,0.0012066276,0.0002837743],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009925554,0.000007236622,0.00042959946,0.000010481494,0.00000711244,0.000036897887,0.000019617877,0.99447376,0.0005004663,0.0029093476,0.00006791481,0.0015277385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001586562,0.000009497373,0.000246993,0.000002705355,0.000005819664,0.00001488232,0.0000065919207,0.99838567,0.00016000993,0.0010684134,0.00009389613,0.0000039344404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011451182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042125364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011451182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017368566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014568722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022769034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032050708","doi":"10.1108/13552510510601311","title":"Joint optimal periodic and conditional maintenance strategy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure; Université de Montréal; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical optimization; Erlang (programming language); Block (permutation group theory); Time horizon; Steady state (chemistry); Expected value; Computer science; Reliability engineering; Engineering; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.015813293019501694,"score_gpt":0.24432584496495027,"score_spread":0.2285125519454486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032050708","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16728055,0.000816722,0.8101624,0.00033786037,0.0000900209,0.00015361265,0.00013335297,0.0005724749,0.020452991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9629291,0.00016542074,0.03386627,0.000030461777,0.000024223953,0.00004690073,0.000059045957,0.000018425553,0.0028600967],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999608,0.000084540654,0.000022256709,0.00007549012,0.0001379189,0.000071906616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995067,0.00015590696,0.000097305674,0.00007188816,0.00012623637,0.00004193719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005450571,0.0004057275,0.00052960165,0.00041925506,0.00023743733,0.0005472192,0.0007748688,0.00032021216,0.0030671428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015998549,0.00018338056,0.00025682102,0.00031706746,0.0003101397,0.0005517579,0.00038267643,0.00025074676,0.00027038326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004100622,0.0001684439,0.002488755,0.0002543388,0.00007429192,0.00031769622,0.000105197505,0.7315821,0.00933195,0.058083218,0.0038953996,0.19328858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028629423,0.00014919466,0.000848363,0.000013873084,0.000031307067,0.00015126864,0.000018313991,0.9876216,0.0014473543,0.008542237,0.0011370922,0.000010680419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021454785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016997489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0030671428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046842295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010474743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010260582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033331083","doi":"10.1108/13552510710735122","title":"Using GenRel for reliability assessment of mining equipment","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Belt Conveyor Systems Engineering","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Reliability engineering; Genetic algorithm; Data mining; Computer science; Engineering; Machine learning","score_opus":0.052949103004672614,"score_gpt":0.35156608125948885,"score_spread":0.29861697825481626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033331083","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0730817,0.00029250194,0.9134883,0.0003812031,0.000039814888,0.0002589575,0.00039383865,0.0019468233,0.010116809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6498014,0.00023832775,0.34500438,0.00015449456,0.000028581373,0.0005430601,0.00064005196,0.0001718312,0.0034178535],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986753,0.0005155178,0.000053187137,0.00016618738,0.000546964,0.000042835443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997503,0.0013015771,0.0003968157,0.00025367882,0.0005027703,0.000042182422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021669792,0.00060251344,0.0005241163,0.0015434743,0.00032519797,0.0010451927,0.0012242921,0.0008134069,0.002117224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008058785,0.00023363029,0.0006622476,0.0006699044,0.00046325976,0.00091033144,0.0006257625,0.00056370517,0.0005536708],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046519806,0.00008063092,0.0058375546,0.0001306736,0.000044938504,0.000102960854,0.00008382218,0.88827944,0.0034824219,0.007914285,0.001097273,0.092899464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000519596,0.00006744769,0.00064200634,0.000016658913,0.000005418698,0.000041455707,0.000010484624,0.9956514,0.00056517357,0.0020786675,0.0009087481,0.0000072576604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052039195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044591622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052039195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021706107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010023525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015748918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036901142","doi":"10.1108/13552511311315977","title":"Vibration‐ and acoustic‐emissions based novelty detection of fretted bearings","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Novelty detection; Fault detection and isolation; Novelty; Engineering; Feature vector; Vibration; Feature (linguistics); Fault (geology); Acoustic emission; Pattern recognition (psychology); Principal component analysis; Dimensionality reduction; Condition monitoring; Reduction (mathematics); Identification (biology); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Acoustics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0120034111469476,"score_gpt":0.24681536769942766,"score_spread":0.23481195655248005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036901142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6506591,0.00041794407,0.3473097,0.00014168136,0.0001197092,0.00008790227,0.00010110081,0.00050277566,0.0006601875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92974824,0.00013463492,0.06923622,0.000032619984,0.000044988927,0.00003555667,0.00013267912,0.000023485929,0.0006116379],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991431,0.00009830055,0.000041710893,0.00013818304,0.00052411645,0.00005459429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976661,0.0008513704,0.00043851236,0.00020877033,0.00076835393,0.00006699411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007019917,0.00058627763,0.0006017903,0.0010313533,0.0001586521,0.00042310377,0.0006664082,0.00044149844,0.00068143086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031862147,0.00021300289,0.00046524787,0.00044931308,0.00036389678,0.0006788963,0.00047067163,0.00044536314,0.00022738088],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007687114,0.00025198466,0.01938442,0.0003021844,0.00009942865,0.00040570932,0.0002740835,0.014757264,0.621349,0.0005169142,0.00049407774,0.34139615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000614141,0.0026054436,0.113904424,0.000043444335,0.00013549729,0.0021279883,0.00028112385,0.422508,0.45419866,0.001289327,0.0027266822,0.0001179448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039283492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067981955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0010313533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002541077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018521673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003712535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041759495","doi":"10.1108/13552510810861923","title":"Optimal inspection and preventive maintenance policy for systems with self‐announcing and non‐self‐announcing failures","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Uniqueness; Preventive maintenance; Originality; Idle; Order (exchange); Computer science; Value (mathematics); Reliability engineering; Optimal maintenance; Operations research; Mathematical optimization; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Mathematics; Economics; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.007945176398540704,"score_gpt":0.2233356510639563,"score_spread":0.2153904746654156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041759495","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44312456,0.00041511486,0.5512047,0.00046317535,0.000029556151,0.0001292518,0.000098379955,0.00016019557,0.004375085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898189,0.00006671287,0.008954777,0.000011709829,0.00000624227,0.000037211914,0.000015501791,0.0000066017274,0.001082328],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949837,0.00015856953,0.00002185991,0.00011555922,0.000080062935,0.00012556174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987985,0.00055469136,0.000384726,0.000058071342,0.00012421157,0.000079879705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011664301,0.0005361021,0.0006101473,0.0005592537,0.00030854656,0.0006858795,0.00083525537,0.0007364942,0.0011008311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028381785,0.00035184188,0.00045531418,0.00024061487,0.0009093111,0.00064311596,0.00047298337,0.0005156401,0.0001353986],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104421386,0.0000856448,0.0016648445,0.000034927718,0.000021442178,0.00009565089,0.000059674578,0.9779854,0.0027904492,0.011446461,0.0001808143,0.005530343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015520576,0.00007233584,0.0005974358,0.000004643747,0.0000139037065,0.000022529774,0.000020955405,0.9956962,0.0004270744,0.0030271898,0.00009641114,0.0000058237247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004940823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030266708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004940823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014168452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012333308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010280013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052776381","doi":"10.1108/13552510510601348","title":"Optimal design of series production lines with unreliable machines and finite buffers","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms","field":"Engineering","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université du Québec; Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical optimization; Series (stratigraphy); Production line; Optimal design; Heuristic; Computer science; Production (economics); Constraint (computer-aided design); Ant colony optimization algorithms; Ant colony; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.015711455222996988,"score_gpt":0.2395742402575183,"score_spread":0.2238627850345213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052776381","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1416596,0.00034903176,0.8495835,0.00015145748,0.000038399005,0.00014395008,0.00009511924,0.00032412872,0.007654863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92630166,0.00018510073,0.070910335,0.000025548126,0.000014228452,0.00013813056,0.00006249953,0.00005105054,0.002311429],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993969,0.0002500779,0.000027555136,0.000108844324,0.00015145312,0.00006522092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987698,0.0005926528,0.0003224658,0.000060216258,0.00019054483,0.00006436622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088668056,0.0009511458,0.0006632136,0.00074125227,0.00034872608,0.0011461115,0.0008907591,0.00064592715,0.0022999975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025694598,0.0006840853,0.00044926576,0.0005159328,0.00075455627,0.0007356457,0.0005570026,0.0005157386,0.00019766937],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053591142,0.000019307297,0.00025488558,0.000044605185,0.000011868252,0.000055796856,0.000021088634,0.98755705,0.0022858325,0.002519673,0.00013102443,0.007045216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021879,0.00010311866,0.00012373153,0.0000074366535,0.000011062526,0.00001713133,0.000018085886,0.99534756,0.0012727724,0.0026627493,0.00041008403,0.0000043364917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022819932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019267392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0022999975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010166653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009049618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0076942444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052964535","doi":"10.1108/13552511111116268","title":"Mapping the dynamics of overall equipment effectiveness to enhance asset management practices","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Quality and Supply Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Overall equipment effectiveness; Originality; Asset (computer security); Function (biology); Risk analysis (engineering); Asset management; System dynamics; Investment (military); Operations management; Engineering; Business; Computer science; Qualitative research; Economics; Microeconomics; Production (economics); Finance; Computer security","score_opus":0.04665165582430302,"score_gpt":0.2981400312505229,"score_spread":0.2514883754262199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052964535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.911225,0.00031001933,0.06764365,0.0007183693,0.000010525925,0.0002438392,0.0005593855,0.0001556197,0.019133598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98240083,0.00012405615,0.016842099,0.00001357108,0.0000014713498,0.00005441021,0.00009375804,0.00001215344,0.00045753934],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985989,0.00079966366,0.000066631874,0.00017494542,0.00025592322,0.00010392511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907046,0.006627095,0.0012526538,0.0005767504,0.00067439635,0.00016450982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002294961,0.00036855802,0.00019906485,0.0032806948,0.00050982716,0.0024608476,0.00065716024,0.00041238827,0.0046703555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013725935,0.00021129243,0.0002818255,0.0031853467,0.001232584,0.0034776127,0.0014659788,0.00050452346,0.00034129652],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001952181,0.0003314324,0.42234713,0.001575881,0.00018260285,0.00080905587,0.06794931,0.051814094,0.0089173755,0.056964654,0.0018957611,0.38701752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027337685,0.0005832916,0.60043234,0.0010210224,0.000116928415,0.0005437103,0.108986236,0.16977116,0.006417655,0.08671644,0.025259204,0.00012474747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063600526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064381543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063600526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021856439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00149531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015857995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065809635","doi":"10.1108/13552510410539204","title":"Stochastic analysis of a maintainable robot‐safety system with common‐cause failures","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Common cause failure; Reliability engineering; Variance (accounting); Mean time between failures; Constant (computer programming); Markov model; Robot; Markov chain; Markov process; Variable (mathematics); Engineering; State (computer science); Failure rate; Computer science; Common cause and special cause; Statistics; Mathematics; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Operations management","score_opus":0.0086000420875686,"score_gpt":0.23262024396924885,"score_spread":0.22402020188168026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065809635","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38506,0.0006271684,0.609405,0.00047433507,0.00003672944,0.000049673137,0.00018159562,0.0002049278,0.0039605773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99417347,0.00019379541,0.004397346,0.000017418432,0.000024591467,0.00003387421,0.00006959012,0.000015968222,0.0010739387],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990514,0.00031051913,0.000027323795,0.000098803735,0.00035440727,0.00015758706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99648935,0.0023398935,0.0005722659,0.000104126455,0.00038354765,0.00011078222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018635517,0.00055829156,0.0007314403,0.00079787907,0.00042936235,0.00063586904,0.0007217423,0.00055457663,0.0010166686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004778482,0.00043584823,0.0007040362,0.0004462073,0.0011676708,0.00071365316,0.0006728958,0.00057739817,0.000093767805],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039158207,0.0000112692,0.0005704361,0.000030566385,0.000027730544,0.00008905498,0.00003676918,0.97869736,0.0015778313,0.016949652,0.00014764321,0.0018224706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052449423,0.00001729728,0.00046435653,0.0000020259774,0.000008677734,0.000015979102,0.0000081481285,0.99542975,0.00019797216,0.0037683684,0.000076720455,0.0000053996655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011069352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045935735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011069352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010942963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010639937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02200985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070599978","doi":"10.1108/13552511111134619","title":"Reliability and availability analysis of a robot‐safety system","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Backup; Reliability engineering; Robot; Reliability (semiconductor); Process (computing); Engineering; System safety; Markov process; Mean time between failures; Markov chain; Markov model; Computer science; Simulation; Failure rate; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.016369480219774617,"score_gpt":0.22683976336942027,"score_spread":0.21047028314964566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070599978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6897754,0.0006125228,0.30400455,0.00022650317,0.0000248792,0.000045998353,0.0001292367,0.00022135249,0.0049595027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99632084,0.000046224373,0.0030732958,0.000005640289,0.000004813949,0.00001142669,0.000024463341,0.000007713788,0.00050549634],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934417,0.00020475582,0.000021568634,0.00010596043,0.00024570464,0.0000778598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997097,0.0018743553,0.00039448318,0.00016219832,0.00041376802,0.000058148602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008238562,0.00029508423,0.00040049173,0.00047997475,0.00029473254,0.00039936975,0.00042012418,0.0003119882,0.0020005761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035724351,0.00016942868,0.00045418882,0.00023099955,0.0005710122,0.00056735787,0.0003385436,0.000413167,0.00018536266],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017899854,0.000039848397,0.005566822,0.00011922042,0.000056680245,0.00019398652,0.00013660558,0.958624,0.011824703,0.010039826,0.00027728753,0.012942039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009200636,0.00015187719,0.0041551576,0.0000079023985,0.000023039056,0.000093901544,0.0000416804,0.9894364,0.0023220207,0.003485271,0.00026324546,0.00001034119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004546608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00178116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004546608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007938512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007747193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009040296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070991662","doi":"10.1108/13552510310466927","title":"Hierarchical control of production and maintenance rates in manufacturing systems","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; École de Technologie Supérieure; Polytechnique Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Preventive maintenance; Optimal control; Production control; Limiting; Mathematical optimization; Production (economics); Reduction (mathematics); Control (management); Optimal maintenance; Stochastic control; Control theory (sociology); Production planning; Engineering; Computer science; Reliability engineering; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.009706710725806434,"score_gpt":0.23311181342613108,"score_spread":0.22340510270032465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070991662","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19103275,0.00030694803,0.8050335,0.00022861378,0.000030409163,0.000048110407,0.000053379008,0.00041650163,0.0028498073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871236,0.00007535796,0.012101435,0.000015417327,0.000010326291,0.000033707693,0.000027522334,0.0000106440675,0.0006020257],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917585,0.00025335874,0.000035255594,0.00016222925,0.00024840358,0.00012492113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998643,0.00066686247,0.0003284889,0.00011902776,0.00016304968,0.00007958124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001593664,0.0005869116,0.0005380356,0.0003434041,0.00034881302,0.00082101964,0.00121735,0.0005792196,0.0009077646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045961994,0.00036405263,0.0004811122,0.00027761166,0.0008441375,0.0010088264,0.00083798415,0.00082111434,0.00013975517],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029618757,0.00003004241,0.0003406464,0.000023407252,0.000007791155,0.000026401467,0.000041923067,0.97653925,0.002746291,0.012910769,0.00011898104,0.0071848296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049648465,0.000016260548,0.00014092684,0.0000012050618,0.000002189458,0.0000027925532,0.0000032628584,0.99651474,0.00036878037,0.0028727413,0.00006957237,0.000002573504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008084724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037754457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008084724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015232293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009928831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016075313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072863921","doi":"10.1108/13552511111180203","title":"Optimal replacement with minimal repair policy for a system operating over a random time horizon","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Time horizon; Mathematical optimization; Simple (philosophy); Function (biology); Horizon; Reliability engineering; Operations research; Originality; Computer science; Value (mathematics); Operations management; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.012745199050193093,"score_gpt":0.2387178765165174,"score_spread":0.22597267746632432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072863921","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39641318,0.0015951522,0.59494925,0.00072130765,0.0000710763,0.0001559685,0.00025080802,0.00029808062,0.0055452026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844743,0.00019912943,0.013375537,0.000024089664,0.0000138626365,0.000040291612,0.0000674623,0.000024181458,0.0017812767],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990841,0.00034609027,0.000032578173,0.00016722956,0.0001571333,0.00021280134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808747,0.0010894244,0.00045949288,0.00009294931,0.00014928723,0.00012135414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014824218,0.0007333422,0.0010683694,0.0006190139,0.00036196597,0.0008328271,0.0007796959,0.0007760877,0.0016638824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040821005,0.00054758467,0.00061730447,0.00040505044,0.0008798908,0.0008610934,0.000446905,0.0007262764,0.00018237477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001233401,0.000031135394,0.00048393168,0.000046427496,0.000024949682,0.000054270444,0.000017276736,0.9912236,0.0014727735,0.002659686,0.0001400734,0.0037226044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022494594,0.00016241815,0.00066993246,0.000007576112,0.000029672485,0.00003274093,0.000017184895,0.9958865,0.0007169503,0.0022312254,0.00021436231,0.000008976475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046626832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002813307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046626832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014143236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013063039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010261714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074693897","doi":"10.1108/13552510710829489","title":"A comparative study of heuristic algorithms to solve maintenance scheduling problem","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms","field":"Engineering","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Tabu search; Simulated annealing; Heuristics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Scheduling (production processes); Algorithm; Heuristic; Job shop scheduling; Metaheuristic; Schedule; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03140479321001383,"score_gpt":0.31168796674356525,"score_spread":0.2802831735335514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074693897","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.458421,0.013643168,0.47148916,0.0010112092,0.00042505644,0.000517509,0.00032649084,0.0013638806,0.052802503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78205806,0.0024252245,0.2129281,0.00016868819,0.0000564859,0.00025658638,0.00029383512,0.00010145144,0.0017114825],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985135,0.0008143107,0.000066148044,0.000115361494,0.00037260583,0.000118067255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957605,0.0032452552,0.00022972123,0.00021742041,0.00047864643,0.000068581736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021926204,0.00066708017,0.00074038986,0.0017900289,0.00053271704,0.0011136254,0.00078877347,0.001022529,0.0020436924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068181087,0.0002590451,0.00090123806,0.0015752218,0.0002965805,0.0008406955,0.0003094489,0.00062344415,0.00024327946],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055885396,0.0003899653,0.0031552897,0.0005191191,0.00022361426,0.00005973636,0.00013047946,0.76654327,0.0023773399,0.015847942,0.0017363612,0.20845802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070896545,0.00053451833,0.0013214779,0.00006797019,0.00008806068,0.00008910203,0.00014234906,0.9888409,0.0017417877,0.0041267294,0.002962551,0.000013562106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002618443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021774438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002618443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013463848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014237935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011595786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077743873","doi":"10.1108/13552510310503222","title":"Adaptive model for vibration monitoring of rotating machinery subject to random deterioration","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Vibration; Kalman filter; Frequency domain; Control theory (sociology); Condition monitoring; Time domain; SIGNAL (programming language); Engineering; Fault (geology); Fault detection and isolation; State-space representation; Computer science; Control engineering; Artificial intelligence; Algorithm; Acoustics; Computer vision","score_opus":0.02936946893459161,"score_gpt":0.31871750251808356,"score_spread":0.2893480335834919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077743873","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06268567,0.00014443196,0.93553644,0.0001306692,0.000044941145,0.000034367848,0.000060931972,0.00041017937,0.0009524123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776744,0.00016802174,0.01885287,0.00003674588,0.000023852788,0.00013340329,0.000109325694,0.000027376267,0.0029740022],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997186,0.000067472436,0.000016183905,0.000086151034,0.00008265957,0.00002882942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955887,0.00022094903,0.000091022135,0.000034035296,0.000083873514,0.000011255281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062271196,0.00050952914,0.00063370465,0.00031809657,0.00016473416,0.0005154064,0.00078469515,0.0008794818,0.0011363443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019138231,0.00027842858,0.00051966857,0.00022929738,0.00038606324,0.0005109763,0.0003601812,0.00084853463,0.00030498498],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107661275,0.000039128634,0.0009874632,0.000044760516,0.000037519698,0.00005991801,0.000061889026,0.97280484,0.005445952,0.0024283372,0.00023481411,0.01774774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003025335,0.000015800064,0.00020166804,8.199033e-7,0.0000028799861,0.0000054195584,0.0000015124965,0.9993191,0.0001672724,0.00023181984,0.00004862726,0.0000021621506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041713277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029500534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041713277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039851308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034429325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0082941055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082731959","doi":"10.1108/13552511011048896","title":"Proportional hazards modeling of engine failures in military vehicles","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Christian ministry; Covariate; Reliability engineering; Engineering; Markov model; Decision model; Diesel fuel; Hazard; Operations research; Markov chain; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Automotive engineering; Business","score_opus":0.009135250757017778,"score_gpt":0.23933906711570685,"score_spread":0.23020381635868908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082731959","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34231707,0.000402138,0.6504762,0.0006725946,0.00008180497,0.00022402442,0.0005230943,0.00045960757,0.0048433784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97877,0.00015942643,0.015687142,0.00003214097,0.000027966857,0.0001327468,0.000189706,0.000034611712,0.0049663577],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981875,0.0010093427,0.000047673173,0.0002662701,0.0002499404,0.00023924452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937171,0.00496382,0.00063412526,0.00021848986,0.00033134702,0.00013514355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046164803,0.00074007985,0.0008077733,0.0010313699,0.00046138128,0.00095571234,0.0019124028,0.00077221805,0.0050104437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01119746,0.0005664026,0.001119904,0.0005563699,0.00090766384,0.00078014925,0.0010055054,0.001234097,0.00043371605],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001301878,0.00006216373,0.0052746427,0.00003570716,0.00004928119,0.00014914523,0.00011857738,0.9713752,0.00028573588,0.013426022,0.00031331915,0.008779991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011542728,0.000042380892,0.0006469893,0.000003908511,0.000009829409,0.000024808578,0.00001931123,0.993455,0.00009412301,0.005446363,0.0002391726,0.00000652617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017000722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005723065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017000722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011953487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012716474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033803582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083665485","doi":"10.1108/13552510810899490","title":"Probabilistic analysis of a repairable robot‐safety system composed of (<i>n</i>−1) standby robots, a safety unit, and a switch","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Robot; Reliability engineering; Reliability (semiconductor); Engineering; Process (computing); Probabilistic logic; Markov process; System safety; Simulation; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.016482154997588642,"score_gpt":0.23158909906306072,"score_spread":0.21510694406547207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083665485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56049097,0.00030541222,0.43574995,0.00021176966,0.000016954802,0.00006925034,0.0001351415,0.00016627762,0.002854209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99460804,0.00007348467,0.0043035094,0.00000955303,0.00000671882,0.000026202615,0.00004738291,0.000011607474,0.00091345364],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993973,0.00018348693,0.000027892775,0.0001276427,0.00015503519,0.00010874632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964903,0.0021820762,0.0007704087,0.00012800556,0.00033369692,0.00009554743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014277903,0.0004566621,0.00055099564,0.0006011827,0.00031741406,0.0005399622,0.0006403002,0.00044313882,0.002409871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031680022,0.00040070142,0.00086239004,0.00029337982,0.0008551674,0.00072854734,0.00048291625,0.000455756,0.00014749194],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007343358,0.000016681619,0.0023975552,0.00004192187,0.000035982022,0.00012242985,0.000054632696,0.9830268,0.0038263584,0.0068183634,0.00014361643,0.0034422844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004254528,0.00004115813,0.0018192581,0.0000030560218,0.000020615495,0.00003327824,0.000022204416,0.9955337,0.000517536,0.0019174201,0.00008058555,0.000006889966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007161114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033733726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007161114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010309176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075306103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014238834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084602948","doi":"10.1108/13552511211265938","title":"A risk‐based approach to manage non‐repairable spare parts inventory","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Forecasting Techniques and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Spare part; Unavailability; Downtime; Reliability engineering; Criticality; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Operations research; Process (computing); Operations management; Engineering; Business","score_opus":0.1391941571290154,"score_gpt":0.38205060473579955,"score_spread":0.24285644760678415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084602948","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040159523,0.00028043363,0.99223983,0.0002052581,0.00003374316,0.000049089358,0.00004223534,0.0001110315,0.0030223415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56107324,0.001117732,0.42595518,0.00017527108,0.00019804545,0.0002701501,0.0002367323,0.00011716027,0.010856476],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986607,0.00031671784,0.00008624885,0.00025688077,0.00056026404,0.00011930957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903226,0.00040247844,0.00015055011,0.0000690414,0.00028697433,0.000058647624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015499229,0.0012597134,0.00093845354,0.0013490571,0.0005685929,0.0022524525,0.0020169234,0.0010226215,0.003641249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002346529,0.0006173324,0.0013019007,0.0008129865,0.00062986545,0.002149794,0.00147565,0.0015538883,0.0005714663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039461607,0.00008607387,0.0012595103,0.00013905729,0.000103353195,0.0002337857,0.00019821087,0.8474623,0.0028365443,0.06321051,0.0015113339,0.08291982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056293998,0.00004842862,0.0003580683,0.000024948326,0.000027675283,0.000083957566,0.00004867532,0.97051114,0.0008047284,0.025632704,0.0024331096,0.000020980286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044339043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003821932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044339043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019691067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022272482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014286995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084709039","doi":"10.1108/13552511111180186","title":"Diagnosis of rotor bearings using logical analysis of data","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Advanced machining processes and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretability; Rotor (electric); Bearing (navigation); Property (philosophy); Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Fault (geology); Data mining; Computer science; Condition monitoring; Field (mathematics); Rolling-element bearing; Machine learning; Reliability engineering; Vibration; Pattern recognition (psychology); Mathematics","score_opus":0.11843594164467783,"score_gpt":0.3344910602180075,"score_spread":0.21605511857332968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084709039","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37843764,0.00026170636,0.61616373,0.0005202152,0.00005609281,0.00028946713,0.00072554784,0.0010534377,0.0024922604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84694266,0.0001012923,0.15201825,0.00008178404,0.000021791977,0.00010061192,0.00040826484,0.000015932164,0.00030937427],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983296,0.0006014401,0.00016530206,0.00027365432,0.00055174436,0.00007834961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907652,0.006852189,0.00096810196,0.00045947143,0.00084372505,0.000111239606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020026062,0.0005825054,0.00044323344,0.0014041294,0.00035204925,0.001426675,0.000598565,0.00044574734,0.0012818053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011804746,0.0001707433,0.0006308011,0.0006414317,0.0005422842,0.0012562572,0.0005894256,0.00039635826,0.0003072412],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035914357,0.00097113784,0.12489272,0.0009206341,0.00036046776,0.0006941068,0.0004947952,0.2005318,0.061798405,0.010813656,0.0016975052,0.59323335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006187918,0.0008027006,0.008053134,0.00004225532,0.000058608835,0.0002549416,0.0001932389,0.9618163,0.022733059,0.005019385,0.0009362562,0.000028136923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013898237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016008338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0020026062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067553343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009320972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0105909705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086844373","doi":"10.1108/13552510510626990","title":"An application of the modulus maxima distribution in machinery condition monitoring","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Maxima; Fault (geology); Wavelet; Condition monitoring; Representation (politics); Vibration; EWMA chart; Wavelet transform; SIGNAL (programming language); Modulus; Engineering; Computer science; Algorithm; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Acoustics; Process (computing)","score_opus":0.008761650576450982,"score_gpt":0.3049666085273124,"score_spread":0.2962049579508614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086844373","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12157606,0.00040045712,0.8747486,0.00019703248,0.000033497676,0.000049081013,0.00013434835,0.00058152975,0.0022794926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88977486,0.00020948099,0.10899038,0.000036979647,0.000044069813,0.000034404453,0.00010536952,0.000056285142,0.00074810337],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996076,0.00009362221,0.000023346054,0.000118867065,0.00013235904,0.000024112534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980574,0.0012741198,0.00026080472,0.0001496345,0.00020410096,0.00005394641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012311871,0.00043683258,0.0003740669,0.0014937524,0.00020976106,0.0006487299,0.00042902806,0.00041773228,0.0012958877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057759653,0.00018807966,0.0003114283,0.0010876677,0.0006131221,0.0012217596,0.00043054702,0.0005047137,0.00034405294],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009083216,0.00012655079,0.018692978,0.0002711255,0.00006876996,0.0004935455,0.00037004394,0.097994596,0.12955476,0.033236608,0.0013000967,0.7169827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003268536,0.00030971668,0.02242823,0.00003888841,0.000031221323,0.0008249201,0.00010598948,0.9071955,0.049764574,0.016004303,0.003210207,0.00005380175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006506472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002670005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0014937524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004527934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026814695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006511271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089216888","doi":"10.1108/13552510210439784","title":"Robot systems reliability and safety: a review","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Robot Manipulation and Learning","field":"Engineering","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Robot; Reliability engineering; Engineering; System safety; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Artificial intelligence; Medicine","score_opus":0.06281210737052899,"score_gpt":0.3224919000956903,"score_spread":0.2596797927251613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089216888","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026635802,0.99806863,0.00025906228,0.0002056599,0.00016462243,0.000009157921,0.00001872595,0.000008550142,0.0009992805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014934412,0.99756265,0.00027741294,0.00010851884,0.00014669442,0.000011777773,0.00002516265,0.000001756553,0.00037267903],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992163,0.0001325439,0.00012746111,0.00009462743,0.00038851597,0.0000405395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976133,0.0013044793,0.000314435,0.00003580747,0.0006788318,0.000053140666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010788589,0.0011556657,0.0019957903,0.003623491,0.00041858153,0.0013748902,0.0014517329,0.0016287296,0.0050243908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027481683,0.0006216425,0.00069892575,0.004327794,0.00044517132,0.0020643696,0.00061769463,0.00080867176,0.0020264534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008488683,0.00008775399,0.0006280967,0.06844906,0.0002036434,0.0005065823,0.00020734705,0.0010859753,0.0012028393,0.0022052948,0.029641736,0.8956967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040885203,0.00041293618,0.0042679384,0.033308297,0.0007827122,0.0032902588,0.00044805507,0.0005110071,0.0012904914,0.0037787107,0.951798,0.00007077506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028962395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003697556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050243908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000877195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028691376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016808331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091627054","doi":"10.1108/13552510010311336","title":"A report on robot reliability and safety in Canada: a survey of robot users","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Occupational Health and Safety Research","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Robot; Reliability (semiconductor); Engineering; Histogram; Computer science; Simulation; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07936753025696573,"score_gpt":0.4246766002934366,"score_spread":0.3453090700364709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091627054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9831057,0.0011028172,0.0003464084,0.0014469476,0.000029105642,0.000099713216,0.007016354,0.000055156375,0.0067978185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99094033,0.0015338514,0.00036365047,0.00061496993,0.000013999859,0.00006266827,0.0024137625,0.00001600036,0.0040407404],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978204,0.00016653453,0.00012265945,0.00009827027,0.0013461205,0.00044608788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989205,0.0008927453,0.0011213763,0.00011736348,0.006986626,0.0016768853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011557367,0.00026908633,0.00028830476,0.0025149707,0.0024807919,0.0011372794,0.0005832946,0.0004817227,0.0024961648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004469532,0.00038708127,0.00047601538,0.0049853083,0.00079956267,0.0004374989,0.0007755177,0.0006589169,0.0004767742],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007974637,0.000060904655,0.96074516,0.00021293847,0.000035054873,0.00018481106,0.006839256,0.0001435157,0.0005094431,0.00010847596,0.0075867977,0.023493873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032002645,0.00004496584,0.98837787,0.000032334905,0.000010410352,0.0000630538,0.005857458,0.0001314678,0.00009901343,0.000010406383,0.005352542,0.000017270333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.990276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99100024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0140318405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0140318405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028732615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10180861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094136778","doi":"10.1108/13552510010341207","title":"Joint determination of the optimum target mean and variance of a process","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Taguchi methods; Variance (accounting); Process (computing); Reduction (mathematics); Function (biology); Quality (philosophy); Statistics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Value (mathematics); Joint (building); Computer science; Econometrics; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.06497288316638775,"score_gpt":0.38670939408879856,"score_spread":0.32173651092241085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094136778","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02782498,0.0003184046,0.9703546,0.00012522959,0.000017024104,0.000022115408,0.000016928598,0.00011275787,0.0012079895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78193176,0.000521665,0.21573853,0.00007500353,0.000060300892,0.00014766319,0.0000931762,0.0001408304,0.001290967],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995865,0.0010299418,0.00024204096,0.0009863378,0.0014669324,0.0004097136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925668,0.0044908146,0.0009161231,0.00046251807,0.0013871521,0.00017656115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051222173,0.0008374933,0.0023827767,0.0012680196,0.00054748106,0.0026863357,0.0008164436,0.0017730084,0.0007233567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01422839,0.00088474795,0.0011174014,0.0008680472,0.0013139867,0.0023835804,0.0015910978,0.0017007807,0.0003875535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005652492,0.00022992307,0.0037323225,0.00044916576,0.00017752037,0.00019611297,0.00023329185,0.73024935,0.094474964,0.035222877,0.0008742598,0.1335949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036998543,0.000274564,0.0025836476,0.00004098667,0.000076458324,0.00013186218,0.000050060415,0.94822395,0.026211321,0.021091478,0.0012142091,0.000064553686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007929327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00075573503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051222173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009522793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002326767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027089179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105647959","doi":"10.1108/jqme-12-2012-0047","title":"Risk-based maintenance and remaining life assessment for gas turbines","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Nalcor Energy (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability engineering; Weibull distribution; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Preventive maintenance; Gas turbines; Risk assessment; Interval (graph theory); Risk management; Work (physics); Turbine; Operations research; Operations management; Computer science; Business; Statistics","score_opus":0.02507879782168979,"score_gpt":0.28493431160258476,"score_spread":0.25985551378089494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105647959","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10514479,0.0017093462,0.884972,0.000397764,0.000051596715,0.000110381305,0.00038260798,0.00036397326,0.0068674847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9742309,0.0005339319,0.02170319,0.00004137875,0.000026993876,0.00012537639,0.00023165853,0.000048262144,0.0030583465],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992555,0.00025921452,0.000037816644,0.00012637409,0.00025137284,0.000069792666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987412,0.00067848776,0.00026225738,0.00006283573,0.00021310516,0.00004210203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012060078,0.0010212332,0.00072115887,0.0010714807,0.00025968236,0.0010900851,0.0015548164,0.0012059652,0.0014765658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033719302,0.00038759268,0.00093064894,0.0005393084,0.0004927961,0.0012661947,0.0006064909,0.00080254267,0.0002103816],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014902925,0.000015004462,0.0007765617,0.000028882827,0.000014032082,0.000048159054,0.000022568012,0.99061966,0.0005153496,0.0031592383,0.00016696668,0.0046187406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020355142,0.000021134869,0.00042714336,0.000008385363,0.000009777095,0.00004328016,0.0000088776615,0.9968266,0.00015358585,0.002230359,0.00026290168,0.000005850008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055733277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033011027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055733277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014487677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092798605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011081755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133729278","doi":"10.1108/jqme-03-2014-0013","title":"Age replacement policies for two-component systems with stochastic dependence","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal; Université Laval; Cegep de Sainte Foy","funders":"","keywords":"Component (thermodynamics); Constant (computer programming); Reliability (semiconductor); Function (biology); Random variable; Stochastic modelling; Preventive maintenance; Domino effect; Probability density function; Computer science; Reliability engineering; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Engineering; Statistics","score_opus":0.02909560418926364,"score_gpt":0.2763367829980244,"score_spread":0.24724117880876076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133729278","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46538988,0.0017021738,0.527652,0.00046166434,0.000081106366,0.0001310646,0.00017673612,0.00031676693,0.0040885652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99287647,0.00021867779,0.0051009753,0.000016353932,0.00001624563,0.00001910623,0.000029898505,0.000010777996,0.0017115286],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992374,0.00021235592,0.00004514614,0.00014408899,0.00020046275,0.00016058599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973475,0.00130475,0.00073186104,0.00014587381,0.00031798694,0.00015192074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016460153,0.00068055274,0.0008488165,0.00066817744,0.00039675707,0.00074545655,0.00090174185,0.0006780134,0.0020438228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036226597,0.00038142808,0.0007261138,0.00038374512,0.00058916333,0.0007826792,0.0006155255,0.0006379225,0.00019301043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017973607,0.00007340144,0.0028685993,0.00009329628,0.000041082025,0.00024062561,0.00006551617,0.97367054,0.0042239227,0.007821244,0.00033416005,0.010387902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009626948,0.000114001276,0.0010995164,0.000004621135,0.000021644133,0.00008773326,0.000015430925,0.9957528,0.0006396164,0.0020073862,0.00024045391,0.0000072102366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031381173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018269201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031381173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010781977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062562927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00870502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141504626","doi":"10.1108/13552510510601320","title":"To maintain or not to maintain? What should a risk‐averse decision maker do?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"","keywords":"Risk aversion (psychology); Originality; Decision maker; Actuarial science; Computer science; Expected utility hypothesis; Economics; Monotone polygon; Component (thermodynamics); Value (mathematics); Operations research; Risk analysis (engineering); Econometrics; Engineering; Mathematics; Business; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.02399852375832842,"score_gpt":0.3048529495930108,"score_spread":0.28085442583468234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141504626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5262442,0.02280279,0.3004582,0.088825114,0.0011856707,0.00029852396,0.00043801367,0.00025515133,0.059492365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810998,0.002598039,0.0132705495,0.0013445289,0.00022384123,0.000037650425,0.000025224996,0.000013790531,0.0013864603],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980716,0.0012216248,0.000080578466,0.00019720152,0.00024410288,0.00018491197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908206,0.005966992,0.0016153426,0.00029686297,0.0006587028,0.0006415126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004933613,0.00049144047,0.000600563,0.00039519524,0.0005268257,0.0028209423,0.0006874013,0.0020911868,0.0029758713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01632319,0.00018378142,0.00034915953,0.00033940113,0.0015361176,0.002453419,0.0006383236,0.0012886113,0.0005518563],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018591906,0.0011230847,0.054760255,0.0026318482,0.0005431618,0.0012236629,0.0059597134,0.06467664,0.009705812,0.2434501,0.017637419,0.59642917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021872915,0.0015181502,0.024995444,0.0016499306,0.00037449476,0.0017423009,0.012226901,0.16306478,0.0049471585,0.74442714,0.044538535,0.0002964405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087894354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00091935747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004933613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007165369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012653045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026091754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147702352","doi":"10.1108/13552510810861914","title":"Ant colonies for structure optimisation in a failure prone series‐parallel production system","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Series (stratigraphy); Production line; Mathematical optimization; Series and parallel circuits; Ant colony optimization algorithms; Production (economics); Ant colony; Computer science; Constraint (computer-aided design); Line (geometry); Homogeneous; Algorithm; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.017087117484387366,"score_gpt":0.2395639069053787,"score_spread":0.22247678942099133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147702352","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078730404,0.00030347623,0.9137813,0.00019043454,0.000035141686,0.000097585915,0.00004134385,0.00023634256,0.006583875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88226664,0.00024322461,0.11190609,0.000048099006,0.000014964946,0.00022315158,0.000046718407,0.000042880132,0.005208322],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996983,0.000117077354,0.000012430004,0.000055586523,0.000081997205,0.000034643665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994702,0.0002804136,0.00011745587,0.000029345856,0.000073269235,0.000029311845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005807545,0.0007463109,0.00075676164,0.00043855657,0.0003972773,0.0006848204,0.00089429005,0.0007815463,0.0014118447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011855961,0.00047323343,0.00064901874,0.000434429,0.0006753088,0.0003937043,0.00065360777,0.0008349208,0.00015159744],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000841802,0.000005669849,0.00008665807,0.000009662275,0.0000058249284,0.00002759081,0.000010793902,0.99669623,0.00034336024,0.00086308364,0.000048789578,0.0018938822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036602924,0.00001210696,0.000035576973,0.0000015133276,0.0000022157517,0.000004812809,0.0000034012612,0.99915135,0.00007879461,0.0005781805,0.00012712786,0.0000013996579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006455824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037402643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006455824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070294645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008633277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012836516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298109637","doi":"10.1108/jqme-08-2014-0046","title":"An optimal production/maintenance strategy under lease contract with warranty periods","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"","keywords":"Lease; Warranty; Production (economics); Maintenance actions; Originality; Present value; Order (exchange); Optimal maintenance; Operations research; Reliability engineering; Operations management; Computer science; Business; Engineering; Economics; Finance; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.01393670944188923,"score_gpt":0.2540662062562128,"score_spread":0.24012949681432355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298109637","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32215676,0.0011690914,0.6630193,0.00066410226,0.000055671928,0.0003487123,0.00017991765,0.00022623359,0.012180215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96697116,0.00024864118,0.02958211,0.00002113059,0.000013636664,0.000063320505,0.00005894256,0.00002308171,0.003018088],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933344,0.00017887667,0.000035098266,0.00017254682,0.00015640754,0.00012352658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989557,0.00039508948,0.0003285272,0.00007892432,0.00014529921,0.00009636224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012668703,0.0007339277,0.0008429314,0.000629272,0.00059820164,0.0017274579,0.0013285966,0.0011950743,0.0032368246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027893758,0.000483134,0.0006111186,0.00046549586,0.00056682655,0.0016361146,0.000662069,0.0008273997,0.0002842563],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042308425,0.00019974919,0.002664842,0.00028301473,0.000052290834,0.0005066145,0.00021032689,0.9173619,0.016640617,0.0154425185,0.0009973783,0.04521763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022011793,0.00020832628,0.001385904,0.000017455775,0.00003056796,0.00011730799,0.000094546456,0.99132055,0.0023283537,0.0038420311,0.00061608595,0.00001680663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044685346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026056888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044685346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001525965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013586294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011071742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298760341","doi":"10.1108/jqme-12-2014-0060","title":"Joint reliability based design and periodic preventive maintenance policy for systems sold with warranty","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Warranty; Preventive maintenance; Reliability engineering; Reliability (semiconductor); Context (archaeology); Constraint (computer-aided design); Total cost; Engineering; Burn-in; Computer science; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.01676152537659786,"score_gpt":0.2384288729333553,"score_spread":0.22166734755675743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298760341","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27200186,0.001804221,0.71384674,0.00054426276,0.00007849123,0.00029038257,0.00015952539,0.00037836234,0.010896167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9633979,0.00030001954,0.034393534,0.000027478207,0.000022854176,0.0001163449,0.00007199418,0.000023317782,0.0016464952],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992268,0.00022392214,0.000038081373,0.00012625578,0.00027234553,0.00011255175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984798,0.0006636912,0.000446218,0.00007310231,0.000269935,0.000067257715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014345153,0.000782382,0.00078895834,0.0007947834,0.0003330869,0.00092437625,0.0008473328,0.0007068632,0.0022867348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035074279,0.0004431384,0.0006741417,0.00040050322,0.00052435417,0.00059944985,0.00045211194,0.0005120641,0.00024884075],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001583878,0.00008129859,0.00090521225,0.00022374935,0.000034390323,0.00010329811,0.00006675581,0.9663291,0.004884577,0.0052858433,0.00038472694,0.021542734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022333077,0.000286977,0.0008217863,0.000020203499,0.00003362855,0.000048055274,0.00002421342,0.99535453,0.0010928737,0.0017572684,0.0005312274,0.000006980238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003258049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026949483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003258049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009901371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016503793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0076498985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336477249","doi":"10.1108/jqme-04-2014-0015","title":"Optimizing production while reducing machinery lockout/tagout circumvention possibilities","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"","keywords":"Production (economics); Reliability engineering; Order (exchange); Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Condition-based maintenance; Operations research; Engineering; Operations management; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.015905457621621447,"score_gpt":0.24223969712400603,"score_spread":0.22633423950238457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336477249","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3079199,0.00079476763,0.6758445,0.00054134853,0.000038409496,0.00029764304,0.00010095562,0.0003357175,0.014126861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9407917,0.0002091649,0.0576565,0.00003705115,0.0000074547147,0.000051014566,0.000046982346,0.000032812728,0.0011673827],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918956,0.00028953643,0.00004025564,0.00015734408,0.00020196388,0.0001212822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842334,0.000652773,0.0005194,0.000176394,0.00016138393,0.00006670776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013921055,0.00076177355,0.0004697391,0.0005806874,0.00032453611,0.0011892227,0.00084108376,0.00050760515,0.0020618103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030335349,0.00032891933,0.00040921525,0.0004891127,0.00054595293,0.00092067185,0.000605985,0.00058657164,0.00031690457],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002686467,0.0003785687,0.0053300615,0.0003735443,0.00006588144,0.00016327006,0.00014732168,0.848444,0.033585556,0.014690899,0.00068972044,0.095862575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051775798,0.0010118737,0.007821078,0.00008031576,0.00009915365,0.00014842994,0.00021851648,0.94909334,0.023072384,0.015060162,0.003311896,0.000031151085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016893005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021471758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0020618103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010074754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00195797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0073622465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2496838318","doi":"10.1108/jqme-05-2012-0018","title":"Availability analysis of a LNG processing plant using the Markov process","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability engineering; Process (computing); Markov chain; Markov process; Interval (graph theory); Reliability (semiconductor); Markov model; State (computer science); Computer science; Engineering; Process state; Algorithm; Mathematics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.018115085283415083,"score_gpt":0.2709274053394155,"score_spread":0.2528123200560004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2496838318","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05319488,0.00048246948,0.938775,0.0004318786,0.000051566996,0.00009767562,0.00029319778,0.00027155026,0.0064017633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9669489,0.00067707285,0.024839647,0.00007110359,0.00005537954,0.00020274041,0.00035960265,0.00004257511,0.006802994],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991284,0.00020248802,0.000039132094,0.00022689004,0.00023821405,0.00016485568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988066,0.00064337865,0.00023465742,0.00004569939,0.00022029481,0.00004934445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010464475,0.00086991803,0.00082551513,0.000960994,0.00070741447,0.0013209557,0.0013094809,0.0008924072,0.0039481847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021688866,0.0004983271,0.001556768,0.0006410552,0.0008302729,0.0011114934,0.0009726737,0.001358024,0.00036130098],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005810303,0.000035613386,0.0026987738,0.000076005075,0.000044486005,0.00022089593,0.00010357886,0.96068716,0.002417756,0.027244817,0.00046565788,0.0059471997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027972342,0.000014768356,0.00033374625,0.0000060490947,0.000011119317,0.000022880375,0.000010953464,0.9961577,0.0002267284,0.0029957946,0.0002107249,0.000006657121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022463517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012761272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022463517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018769866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001844215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044665575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589443969","doi":"10.1108/jqme-07-2015-0030","title":"Optimal CBM policy with two sampling intervals","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability engineering; Weibull distribution; Condition-based maintenance; Reliability (semiconductor); Residual; Interval (graph theory); Sampling (signal processing); Importance sampling; Statistics; Hazard; Preventive maintenance; Sensitivity (control systems); Computer science; Engineering; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Monte Carlo method; Algorithm","score_opus":0.026692761526110474,"score_gpt":0.3153177090883588,"score_spread":0.2886249475622483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589443969","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053940095,0.0003818622,0.9426404,0.00027630982,0.000054160915,0.00013763922,0.00006025951,0.00033321162,0.00217609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9440932,0.0001236815,0.054474335,0.00005213896,0.000028236998,0.00009991295,0.00004921531,0.000019800422,0.0010595169],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867415,0.00036584743,0.00006407063,0.00035091158,0.0003543904,0.000190614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99752945,0.0012654798,0.00047185487,0.00020014968,0.00035030313,0.00018276137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001643167,0.00070118206,0.0010558672,0.0005526359,0.00037816027,0.0008145715,0.0015578023,0.00085879915,0.0023108919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005520577,0.00033198082,0.0005430153,0.00035437336,0.00073243986,0.0009144961,0.0008144439,0.0012108951,0.00020172723],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005354171,0.00016525519,0.002411653,0.00016796711,0.000041631753,0.00016081183,0.00010812108,0.89844966,0.0054992577,0.02323759,0.0011371013,0.06808555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027439226,0.00009140453,0.00043033372,0.000010961845,0.000011795209,0.00004027175,0.000013698793,0.99496907,0.0008654652,0.0031933924,0.0003375928,0.00000859671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051481714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020032886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051481714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012747196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001726819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010236442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750424462","doi":"10.1108/jqme-06-2016-0028","title":"Bearing temperature monitoring of a Wind Turbine using physics-based model","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"","keywords":"SCADA; Bearing (navigation); Turbine; Control chart; ALARM; Wind power; Engineering; Wind speed; Computer science; Reliability engineering; Control engineering; Marine engineering; Mechanical engineering; Meteorology; Artificial intelligence; Aerospace engineering","score_opus":0.18448093095330395,"score_gpt":0.45511740380563165,"score_spread":0.2706364728523277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2750424462","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18415678,0.00029456694,0.810412,0.000115487535,0.000059947233,0.00007081249,0.0001104834,0.00088855834,0.003891329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859644,0.00012427886,0.012836773,0.000010158286,0.000014087644,0.000042679654,0.000053368545,0.000018810335,0.0009353395],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.999864,0.000020030448,0.0000071333625,0.0000455025,0.000054382803,0.000008927894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998486,0.000060714065,0.000031297866,0.00001702233,0.000036472324,0.0000058174405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017119602,0.00038500602,0.00043353706,0.0002663227,0.00018271402,0.00059953274,0.00048590513,0.00038923262,0.0006047212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006502009,0.00018991271,0.0005372162,0.00019192568,0.00025373534,0.00048998505,0.00023460196,0.00034347712,0.00015779336],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006637915,0.000061879255,0.0028771795,0.0000859687,0.000032631222,0.00009500715,0.000056618344,0.95408225,0.018677764,0.0012435444,0.00029102425,0.022429802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022022805,0.000021020549,0.0006051543,0.000001563561,0.0000042671113,0.000011738077,0.0000022308172,0.9983506,0.00075075345,0.00013806239,0.000109187575,0.00000317018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003410049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023874082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003410049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002636588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003937784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006780386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763991617","doi":"10.1108/jqme-06-2016-0023","title":"Maintenance strategies: Decision Making Grid vs Jack-Knife Diagram","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Downtime; Pareto analysis; Reliability engineering; Ranking (information retrieval); Predictive maintenance; Computer science; Preventive maintenance; Operations research; Scope (computer science); Pareto principle; Engineering; Operations management; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.012230045370374027,"score_gpt":0.2785204771279729,"score_spread":0.26629043175759887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763991617","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.100664884,0.0013583268,0.83614576,0.0019107419,0.00026290285,0.0017452592,0.0027912124,0.0015089836,0.05361193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48379442,0.00082537864,0.509514,0.00021242636,0.000043556392,0.0013961806,0.0011587257,0.00014078061,0.0029145603],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931809,0.0043112827,0.0003676674,0.00067827775,0.001308256,0.00015365059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97487426,0.020644374,0.001717929,0.0008986046,0.0015216212,0.0003432869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073005036,0.0009910795,0.000686592,0.002886044,0.00045787817,0.004290717,0.0015051614,0.0009861036,0.01111408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02911621,0.00034881337,0.00085010583,0.0029029509,0.0012822308,0.003377373,0.0012855798,0.0012176556,0.001185102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011881792,0.00043559138,0.013926601,0.0030277704,0.00022561468,0.0003208017,0.0029860726,0.23399301,0.001634762,0.26023367,0.0115735335,0.47045448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044817146,0.0009065308,0.010190738,0.0014917607,0.0001868,0.000333737,0.0043294467,0.69048953,0.0031541837,0.21864012,0.06963289,0.00019612856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049970965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004136839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01111408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002785267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002508122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038609266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785066942","doi":"10.1108/jqme-01-2016-0003","title":"Gear fault detection using dynamic transmission variance","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University; Queen's University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Position (finance); Transmission (telecommunications); Fault (geology); SIGNAL (programming language); Engineering; Drive shaft; Angular displacement; Rotational speed; Non-circular gear; Structural engineering; Worm drive; Gear train; Spiral bevel gear; Control theory (sociology); Acoustics; Mechanical engineering; Computer science; Electrical engineering; Artificial intelligence; Physics; Geology","score_opus":0.01284275738971346,"score_gpt":0.2631509402926099,"score_spread":0.2503081829028964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785066942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7580411,0.00061300886,0.23431385,0.00013355352,0.000087945606,0.00012322162,0.0003431677,0.00066160114,0.005682464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9669111,0.00015710041,0.032202728,0.00002137832,0.000030443689,0.000021459497,0.000116577,0.000025896947,0.0005133597],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937433,0.000082091574,0.000028246823,0.00013970376,0.00033404506,0.000041666153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895084,0.0004706848,0.00020358738,0.00011015738,0.00023706676,0.000027618484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003640856,0.00043787816,0.00037474933,0.002006142,0.00018833485,0.00062007,0.00047797593,0.00031355247,0.0012527568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023760814,0.00023123622,0.00026829552,0.0009767328,0.00028880793,0.00057819835,0.00046343156,0.00030507948,0.0002786235],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063877326,0.00025602468,0.06771148,0.00055501395,0.00017703194,0.00062773697,0.0004952745,0.022910949,0.34606677,0.0016202003,0.00083460606,0.55810606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104629326,0.00185076,0.25753394,0.00017917022,0.0003091659,0.003363789,0.00064262707,0.3975659,0.32928798,0.0032792445,0.0056961086,0.00018675903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011035027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015678597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002006142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026699287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022652764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004190922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793821770","doi":"10.1108/jqme-11-2016-0069","title":"Maintenance and setup planning in manufacturing systems under uncertainties","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"","keywords":"Robustness (evolution); Production (economics); Computer science; Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equation; Mathematical optimization; Paper machine; Optimal control; Industrial engineering; Reliability engineering; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.022166998238164867,"score_gpt":0.27065885335014706,"score_spread":0.24849185511198219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793821770","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18221235,0.0009246872,0.8091025,0.00046651912,0.00004921819,0.000121033045,0.00024582425,0.00025239118,0.006625483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97995836,0.00017992707,0.018493311,0.000021159316,0.0000110037,0.00005537519,0.000073314324,0.000021597354,0.0011860509],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903,0.00039786802,0.000033075055,0.00016995397,0.00017758412,0.0001914618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978746,0.0015917735,0.00031236451,0.000058339872,0.00010358396,0.000059282844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015356293,0.00072779966,0.0010753246,0.0006499224,0.0005489803,0.0011441638,0.0010260337,0.0010697294,0.001799692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003954269,0.0007992717,0.0006378915,0.0007477019,0.0011699443,0.00097406097,0.0006620144,0.0010244865,0.00012496792],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019148913,0.000008681107,0.00024153719,0.000018075907,0.0000082064425,0.000034655517,0.000012704812,0.99470913,0.0001663027,0.0024012483,0.000062603416,0.002317634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000517691,0.000018581584,0.00032227166,0.0000061621136,0.0000051154357,0.0000092487435,0.0000133491285,0.99570125,0.00022509861,0.0035710055,0.000116589006,0.000006007555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012454766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065335426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012454766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001789563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016099487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024764538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886613520","doi":"10.1108/jqme-04-2016-0017","title":"Remaining useful life estimation of metropolitan train wheels considering measurement error","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Railway Engineering and Dynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metropolitan area; Engineering; Prognostics; Estimation; Reliability engineering; Profiling (computer programming); Computer science","score_opus":0.048002414383236415,"score_gpt":0.28431863625900083,"score_spread":0.23631622187576443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886613520","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22516276,0.0006115872,0.77183294,0.0001211871,0.00002789449,0.000034060722,0.00016879741,0.00030067097,0.0017400762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864928,0.00014192858,0.012407711,0.00001263926,0.0000099719955,0.000017882598,0.00013884126,0.000013037241,0.00076523895],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994986,0.0000900105,0.00003975567,0.00011143832,0.00019971932,0.000060414925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871945,0.0004410386,0.00028013592,0.00015545929,0.0003632839,0.000040676572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082401163,0.00055388355,0.0005602356,0.0012401089,0.0002840837,0.0009018755,0.00083100307,0.0005590948,0.00073463237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032471763,0.00021152364,0.0006335474,0.0006037557,0.00032676553,0.0010879221,0.0007726199,0.00038767233,0.00016317084],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016769944,0.000065767876,0.050816707,0.00020304526,0.000091674985,0.00029485166,0.00024903263,0.8161306,0.01181504,0.0031421466,0.0005747712,0.1164487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002190439,0.0000370396,0.006432416,0.000017098891,0.000021861471,0.000056891604,0.000053770425,0.98963505,0.0023389554,0.0009655163,0.00042472171,0.000014465132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01216989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00932533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01216989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008293632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073386164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024198115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909183615","doi":"10.1108/jqme-04-2017-0027","title":"A decision support tool for bi-objective risk-based maintenance scheduling of an LNG gas sweetening unit","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Scheduling (production processes); Engineering; Multi-objective optimization; Pareto principle; Reliability engineering; Schedule; Shutdown; Operations research; Computer science; Operations management","score_opus":0.012253743581122224,"score_gpt":0.26686274072369576,"score_spread":0.2546089971425735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909183615","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046399806,0.00013990952,0.9438681,0.00022295197,0.000041753872,0.0002125869,0.00044038778,0.0041353116,0.0045391917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5022851,0.00019237447,0.4928783,0.00014111308,0.000023572404,0.0004899447,0.00056231295,0.00022205563,0.003205171],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996506,0.00010063384,0.000027254222,0.00006337812,0.00011808723,0.000040047933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859816,0.00091172935,0.00015076439,0.000060094273,0.00021864887,0.00006061368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010132293,0.0009489354,0.00081238634,0.0008425424,0.00042899698,0.001090392,0.0011588235,0.0011004631,0.007527911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025787987,0.00053405284,0.00084813486,0.00039908144,0.00021778018,0.0006200912,0.0006972134,0.0010666258,0.0007709963],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112697555,0.000117982985,0.0011791572,0.00012239272,0.000044885142,0.00016541677,0.00006299474,0.93741417,0.0029826632,0.0032853945,0.0012419837,0.053270236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017867775,0.000022599614,0.000087841734,0.000011014897,0.000008942238,0.000014789954,0.000009644781,0.99762696,0.00073494116,0.0006842267,0.00077642733,0.0000047097164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056665596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004866863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007527911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007605492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014148215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02518338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914242382","doi":"10.1108/jqme-07-2017-0051","title":"Comparative study on logical analysis of data (LAD), artificial neural networks (ANN), and proportional hazards model (PHM) for maintenance prognostics","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Prognostics; Turbofan; Artificial neural network; Engineering; Residual; Reliability engineering; Data set; Set (abstract data type); Condition-based maintenance; Statistical model; Data mining; Computer science; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Algorithm","score_opus":0.0855465146043742,"score_gpt":0.38522053826582175,"score_spread":0.2996740236614476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914242382","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83086795,0.0030375987,0.15807219,0.0014855716,0.0001801958,0.00029635747,0.00039103912,0.00055733806,0.005111791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755005,0.0005392552,0.02288554,0.000083478364,0.000030981813,0.00008318218,0.00019090992,0.000012361923,0.00067372783],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835664,0.0009621196,0.000089340385,0.00017985914,0.00034547105,0.00006647621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98745745,0.010237976,0.00053929305,0.00030150186,0.0013164419,0.0001474639],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054506836,0.0007310724,0.0004934758,0.0015081764,0.0002791614,0.0010272533,0.00064559263,0.00061645254,0.00062071125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01529335,0.00019287375,0.00050001475,0.00077072234,0.00032703823,0.0012511184,0.00066712976,0.000519783,0.0000841515],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015446101,0.0006339932,0.10348635,0.00054020813,0.00052951457,0.00026862425,0.00029525204,0.6145492,0.0027961663,0.006166703,0.0015812486,0.2676081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002269365,0.000635084,0.010909639,0.00003319974,0.00005831734,0.000036544487,0.00011759738,0.9857627,0.0010021421,0.00093633146,0.00046887147,0.000016888309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0152872205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010890435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0152872205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018452404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012553296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030396461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943418631","doi":"10.1108/jqme-05-2018-0041","title":"Non-linear threshold algorithm based solution for the redundancy allocation problem considering multiple redundancy strategies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Redundancy (engineering); Mathematical optimization; Simulated annealing; Computer science; Triple modular redundancy; Particle swarm optimization; Computational complexity theory; Algorithm; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01871479499429573,"score_gpt":0.26048179076073097,"score_spread":0.24176699576643523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943418631","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011329539,0.00012046323,0.9849192,0.00008660627,0.000030805673,0.00006225078,0.000013826562,0.00017671369,0.0032605915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39660755,0.00024670194,0.59768707,0.00011443169,0.000029470975,0.00035764562,0.00010085606,0.000080201,0.0047760177],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996344,0.00010290217,0.00002553214,0.000068836394,0.00011435304,0.000054010317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994265,0.00032869895,0.000076131815,0.000026558035,0.00011672103,0.000025374307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000516368,0.0006052589,0.000622227,0.0004966245,0.00041892604,0.00094188255,0.001186883,0.0008465181,0.003250422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016089564,0.0002731351,0.0006995218,0.0005421175,0.00037412805,0.00066657906,0.00068315887,0.00093600445,0.0004199004],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008970098,0.00008281536,0.0005801821,0.00016584338,0.00003968824,0.000088188935,0.00008858613,0.88872665,0.0048429803,0.018710962,0.0011466921,0.0854377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008992271,0.000044306533,0.000050575185,0.000006410296,0.000005385007,0.000025661684,0.000011148581,0.996842,0.0006808979,0.0018291511,0.0004925772,0.0000030084307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028466526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023060585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003250422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060006493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017458874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010873735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2956059284","doi":"10.1108/jqme-01-2018-0004","title":"Intersection of corrosion prevention strategy and practice","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Armed Forces; Royal Military College of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Engineering; Preventive maintenance; Corrosion prevention; Corrosion; Order (exchange); Risk analysis (engineering); Transport engineering; Intersection (aeronautics); Operations research; Operations management; Computer science; Business; Reliability engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.014525414493720459,"score_gpt":0.2766741700682861,"score_spread":0.26214875557456563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2956059284","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16325985,0.012038389,0.07217251,0.06869957,0.00036328248,0.00032239666,0.00010512584,0.00026368588,0.68277526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768742,0.0024740396,0.010927357,0.0010940725,0.00007923878,0.00007124512,0.000024156716,0.00003525238,0.00842043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875206,0.0051742736,0.0005021761,0.001493983,0.00412914,0.001179911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848135,0.004313847,0.0028095725,0.0015827677,0.0049637207,0.001516514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008817528,0.000464588,0.00036458988,0.0028199472,0.0019626636,0.008855508,0.0016083391,0.0020968944,0.007161941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017466215,0.00023452504,0.00033747812,0.0015856366,0.010190434,0.0034397482,0.0041958676,0.0015991445,0.00093468104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074280986,0.00040094278,0.02390022,0.0007109269,0.000064447384,0.00032416813,0.005901742,0.0036126906,0.0009468225,0.6684936,0.012481144,0.2830889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004795191,0.00070248696,0.045687735,0.0020811174,0.000057533023,0.0013678949,0.031308897,0.009862562,0.00282005,0.5526638,0.35330397,0.00009597103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010243622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010164806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011144875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011144875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01496855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080862105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2985992878","doi":"10.1108/jqme-10-2018-0087","title":"Fault detection for parallel operating machines","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Redundancy (engineering); Fault detection and isolation; Residual; Computer science; Autoregressive model; Fault (geology); Condition monitoring; Vibration; Bearing (navigation); Reliability engineering; Real-time computing; Control engineering; Engineering; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.012626316008251313,"score_gpt":0.2997699237758784,"score_spread":0.2871436077676271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2985992878","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47844142,0.00028259595,0.5190432,0.00006894057,0.00003645744,0.000065599495,0.00007613979,0.0009062824,0.0010792813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.965478,0.00005697884,0.033855975,0.000009128428,0.000010606778,0.000014081519,0.000059237085,0.000014274234,0.00050168025],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954945,0.000055809076,0.000025050553,0.00011249762,0.00021164393,0.00004557946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988709,0.00048773483,0.0002786914,0.00012794333,0.00020362664,0.000031098767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004055759,0.00040048602,0.00048125803,0.0010425161,0.0002118403,0.00033232884,0.00041141466,0.00039330195,0.0011502386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025496292,0.00018105865,0.00031261166,0.00043107392,0.0002999739,0.00056839274,0.00037457934,0.00031146215,0.00024941558],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009815743,0.00025844589,0.025828736,0.0002512037,0.00010775765,0.0005744458,0.00025393182,0.16051462,0.16651013,0.0019817853,0.0006893606,0.642048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026063457,0.00057628873,0.02373694,0.000013885352,0.00004113027,0.00067971146,0.000095886535,0.9352789,0.03595283,0.002550652,0.0010241494,0.000023545608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013572255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011794734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0013572255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003064998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002452315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0038479567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3083181974","doi":"10.1108/jqme-03-2020-0017","title":"Wind power system reliability and maintenance optimization considering turbine and wind uncertainty","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Power System Reliability and Maintenance","field":"Engineering","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Turbine; Wind power; Reliability (semiconductor); Reliability engineering; Wind speed; Engineering; Renewable energy; Electric power system; Marine engineering; Power (physics); Meteorology; Mechanical engineering; Electrical engineering","score_opus":0.01262036075807065,"score_gpt":0.22242886753198332,"score_spread":0.20980850677391266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3083181974","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41889805,0.00086274894,0.57308596,0.00028213198,0.000036970654,0.000076429555,0.0002804906,0.00017001345,0.0063071502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853963,0.00016316556,0.013544761,0.000009359955,0.000009483437,0.000029333201,0.00009882174,0.00001846655,0.000730174],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99978393,0.00008839046,0.000009505995,0.000036634603,0.000054609714,0.000026926757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995185,0.00031284898,0.0000699953,0.00002255819,0.000060358827,0.00001568999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000520487,0.00048205708,0.00055396225,0.00034968837,0.00018783359,0.0004446802,0.00028185747,0.00032844205,0.0006181146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014209185,0.00027614183,0.00047383897,0.00032334676,0.00021407484,0.00039026423,0.00023734341,0.00040323372,0.00007833025],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011772614,0.0000069434973,0.00065719004,0.000015519086,0.00000944494,0.000029150839,0.0000058034184,0.9944771,0.0005271379,0.00045396818,0.000092884016,0.0037131466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016992097,0.00001623628,0.0005531312,0.0000022769557,0.00000492542,0.000008415089,0.000004309232,0.99867034,0.00017860188,0.000487755,0.00007059245,0.0000017636646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005606784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004170448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005606784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038810418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055043556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011148274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169825082","doi":"10.1108/jqme-06-2020-0050","title":"Appropriate strategy selection for reliability-centered maintenance of one-shot systems using fuzzy model","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Data mining; Expert system; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; One shot; Reliability engineering; Engineering","score_opus":0.07032335816318719,"score_gpt":0.2972927037030867,"score_spread":0.2269693455398995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169825082","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09957809,0.00026491802,0.89383554,0.00010057907,0.000021998267,0.0000870935,0.00003587687,0.00017357436,0.005902279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.960223,0.00007980693,0.038094655,0.000024545006,0.0000058046962,0.00005563219,0.000032875436,0.000008450835,0.0014753025],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995704,0.00011847413,0.000019773237,0.00010829123,0.000128943,0.00005411348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995152,0.00024001847,0.0000647406,0.000033647637,0.00012515236,0.000021329604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007087124,0.0005133396,0.0006285596,0.00068728765,0.00033852344,0.00089188275,0.00081553066,0.00072012155,0.0017745525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019852973,0.0002173508,0.0005285728,0.00021279116,0.00034281742,0.0005944182,0.00040284643,0.00040781117,0.00016873301],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013514693,0.000109778994,0.002312809,0.00018362862,0.000073697694,0.00021749656,0.00033480764,0.8958005,0.011032602,0.0139095485,0.0007428248,0.075147256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064545457,0.00007052569,0.00047480655,0.000012888406,0.000017070572,0.00003678263,0.000042703112,0.9956442,0.0011388953,0.002194126,0.00035306253,0.000008516076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054487525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004299749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054487525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007010765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073914387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010834098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206390449","doi":"10.1108/jqme-10-2020-0109","title":"Models for maintenance planning and scheduling – a citation-based literature review and content analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Co-citation; Thematic analysis; Computer science; Exploratory analysis; Data science; Scheduling (production processes); Citation analysis; Operations research; Management science; Engineering; Operations management; Sociology; Social science; Qualitative research; Library science","score_opus":0.0379132787457484,"score_gpt":0.2849896022973017,"score_spread":0.2470763235515533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206390449","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015640208,0.93765265,0.018128121,0.009191826,0.0013959988,0.0008628151,0.0022675043,0.00020068084,0.014660221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.118248075,0.8471977,0.026808145,0.0010846865,0.0011667183,0.0010559836,0.0022032792,0.000069982336,0.0021653485],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899076,0.004171581,0.0017256071,0.0006969297,0.0032428622,0.0002554209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9450102,0.03922554,0.004953324,0.0014715996,0.008939337,0.00040004036],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013523063,0.001132261,0.0017411768,0.06234851,0.001302869,0.005536824,0.001875831,0.0016837119,0.003278779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04760858,0.00068295444,0.0024418985,0.048568025,0.001197047,0.007037683,0.0017108407,0.001152544,0.0006419374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013487162,0.00021148221,0.00785153,0.11132779,0.0013976368,0.0008865419,0.004029953,0.012246021,0.0011814957,0.060384553,0.04509739,0.75525075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006432377,0.00046256112,0.027430145,0.25994548,0.005206029,0.0021548439,0.009171752,0.0265362,0.0020036567,0.061221156,0.60551095,0.00029300802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065551326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076752566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9376515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006334532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015268289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07151759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292261361","doi":"10.1108/jqme-01-2022-0004","title":"Condition-based monitoring of the rail wheel using logical analysis of data and ant colony optimization","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Railway Engineering and Dynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ant colony optimization algorithms; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Artificial neural network; Data mining; Computer science","score_opus":0.03885443131445104,"score_gpt":0.29514765277373217,"score_spread":0.25629322145928113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292261361","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16430122,0.00031217866,0.8304819,0.00034964352,0.000046254136,0.00024887297,0.0003533085,0.00070989056,0.003196749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8651017,0.00015632102,0.13344818,0.000046101402,0.000017384928,0.00013020268,0.00029412244,0.000020127443,0.0007858048],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995647,0.00007961042,0.0000482284,0.000085087726,0.0001951487,0.000027095666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911803,0.0003381297,0.00022261369,0.00006832353,0.00022229462,0.000030711944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044044483,0.00040617058,0.00043107208,0.0017466614,0.00029109156,0.0010863385,0.00060384005,0.00031126832,0.00060685194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020127562,0.00019920345,0.00049955933,0.0010508928,0.0003701824,0.0007641893,0.00047043318,0.0003552609,0.00014251568],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039915773,0.00036912112,0.045806006,0.00045025852,0.00022582435,0.0005587528,0.00038271115,0.5090893,0.039500523,0.006808294,0.0017512531,0.39465892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064329074,0.00006437495,0.0039899107,0.000015004289,0.00001847188,0.000068472946,0.00008244675,0.9892554,0.004269521,0.0014624603,0.00075583614,0.000011670907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003167496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041628745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003167496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005582237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070209143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006298125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293087192","doi":"10.1108/jqme-04-2021-0026","title":"Preventive maintenance and silica exposure limits integrated in the production planning of a granite processing unit","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"","keywords":"Production (economics); Preventive maintenance; Production planning; Originality; Context (archaeology); Stochastic programming; Function (biology); Reliability engineering; Engineering; Operations research; Computer science; Operations management; Risk analysis (engineering); Mathematical optimization; Business; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.02346134568840674,"score_gpt":0.2671968218012263,"score_spread":0.24373547611281954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293087192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5388371,0.0003950872,0.4535234,0.00028855226,0.000023696179,0.00025032306,0.000085815125,0.00017255482,0.0064235027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778021,0.00007800454,0.02128469,0.0000074140316,0.0000027870153,0.000031932894,0.000022015476,0.00000906312,0.0007619949],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936026,0.00021491443,0.00003035015,0.00014847385,0.00013923546,0.00010669843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891627,0.00052182464,0.0003101173,0.000058082067,0.00013172594,0.00006201807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007903949,0.00043313572,0.00040584122,0.00044557676,0.0003667979,0.0011006455,0.00087183865,0.00057402655,0.001471374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022300803,0.00038163102,0.00038883282,0.000348768,0.0004893174,0.0006039557,0.000583435,0.0004993848,0.00012570317],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019880573,0.000115155766,0.0056191823,0.00009786742,0.000030524272,0.00015100332,0.00010197245,0.9560663,0.005926914,0.0039464915,0.00012726916,0.027618574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025752486,0.00044491535,0.0061499677,0.000029499311,0.0000805171,0.00008845595,0.00022620075,0.9810616,0.005730427,0.0053328266,0.0008060158,0.000023961233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009762897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008641302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009762897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013096556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002540677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0194121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7105981217","doi":"10.1108/jqme-04-2025-0025","title":"A semi-Markov model for reliability and cost analysis of two-unit cold standby systems considering operator fatigue, preventive maintenance and imperfect repairs","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Downtime; Preventive maintenance; Reliability (semiconductor); Imperfect; Operator (biology); Maintenance engineering; Corrective maintenance; Quality (philosophy)","score_opus":0.017292805404390987,"score_gpt":0.2898611953423296,"score_spread":0.27256838993793864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7105981217","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08702874,0.0007966331,0.9024782,0.00078927923,0.0000916676,0.00016856263,0.0007884777,0.00031617616,0.0075422237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96248543,0.0007679645,0.024550091,0.00011254749,0.0000663582,0.00039216867,0.00053654687,0.000058612422,0.011030423],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.998982,0.00035614002,0.000044552224,0.0001635142,0.00019479106,0.0002589304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964217,0.0024190035,0.000493447,0.00011492631,0.00040145448,0.00014949615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021803998,0.0014081146,0.0016642064,0.0010830706,0.00066059316,0.0015909206,0.0020827132,0.0018291484,0.005833218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043731257,0.0009821282,0.0017153209,0.0007939708,0.0013419221,0.001506198,0.0011806998,0.0019959898,0.0006971838],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043940414,0.000020990336,0.0006266207,0.000033985198,0.0000241422,0.000094236384,0.000037231366,0.9845281,0.00046435674,0.012379977,0.00026408586,0.0014822531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049749874,0.000012391374,0.000147072,0.0000044201724,0.000007946725,0.000009654471,0.000008967105,0.9972692,0.00005195539,0.0023620871,0.00011666697,0.0000046494956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029650602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020000199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029650602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024320162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022099758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058956027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}