{"meta":{"query_hash":"a328f3bb62c2","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering"},"cohort_total":66,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":66,"exported":66,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a328f3bb62c2","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Quality+in+Maintenance+Engineering"},"results":[{"id":"W1528964841","doi":"10.1108/jqme-11-2013-0074","title":"A nearly optimal inspection policy for a two-component series system","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability engineering; Context (archaeology); Component (thermodynamics); Sequence (biology); Series (stratigraphy); Condition-based maintenance; Function (biology); Engineering; Preventive maintenance; Set (abstract data type); Total cost; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics","score_opus":0.019920589644512533,"score_gpt":0.27051747991665154,"score_spread":0.250596890272139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1528964841","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3441975,0.00022359527,0.65308565,0.00053619256,0.001253829,0.0002764358,0.000009402721,0.00021686498,0.0002005369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96299505,0.000046281843,0.036362242,0.00001850417,0.0004858862,0.000026449301,0.0000024024857,0.000037705424,0.000025450036],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983777,0.00003987804,0.0008616117,0.00012010302,0.00024475963,0.00035595457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990859,0.00007851318,0.00017456457,0.00016624073,0.00034653523,0.0001482696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017011905,0.0001847897,0.00042553782,0.00032729658,0.00002668787,0.000057699835,0.00017226534,0.00008428272,5.775519e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076480344,0.00017409383,0.00013734965,0.00036946707,0.000028162462,0.00061796943,0.00001812215,0.0002877589,0.0000019193858],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013966362,0.000023227472,0.000080334816,0.00031086706,0.000028425951,0.000009995155,0.0010920808,0.9845226,0.0021183167,0.011119721,0.0002483945,0.00030636694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028899384,0.00027073902,0.0014627436,0.00075698516,0.000018646486,0.0003110492,0.0031141264,0.98611253,0.0018168533,0.00036802219,0.0024991995,0.00037917754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006356534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013540219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6187976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011816843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009964041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70993406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1578655672","doi":"10.1108/jqme-02-2013-0006","title":"Reliability analysis of underground mining equipment using genetic algorithms","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Reliability engineering; Engineering; Automation; Genetic algorithm; Set (abstract data type); Productivity; Data mining; Computer science; Machine learning","score_opus":0.0224425929351243,"score_gpt":0.3181979007979365,"score_spread":0.2957553078628122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1578655672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5898256,0.00013791432,0.40971258,0.00002217328,0.00016417216,0.00005283845,0.0000030691658,0.000040507326,0.00004119806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85326266,0.00008572566,0.14653336,0.000017786702,0.00006753128,0.0000035128799,9.608949e-7,0.00002651405,0.000001979129],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.997548,0.00010424993,0.0014638596,0.00015617101,0.00039258145,0.00033514766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858344,0.00048231264,0.00034097972,0.00033347897,0.00016483321,0.00009497538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026066336,0.00021630652,0.00083490333,0.0007812449,0.000015141697,0.00002313293,0.00030424236,0.00010110135,0.000010321824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008555509,0.00020971273,0.00028173169,0.0009533218,0.000032776188,0.00019317244,0.00004413593,0.00033918626,2.2121336e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067329693,0.00004438709,0.013712568,0.0001942812,0.00023838154,0.000006661675,0.000319811,0.97627777,0.006880719,0.00019720133,0.000025199559,0.002096292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028215183,0.000051719406,0.14014915,0.0002891944,0.00016551108,0.000010245997,0.00012910618,0.85662735,0.0017523346,0.00019637602,0.00013188944,0.0002149833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000097909535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022641143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2634371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044803516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022619406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8551837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1878151390","doi":"10.1108/jqme-05-2013-0030","title":"Human factors engineering in aircraft maintenance: a review","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Occupational Health and Safety Research","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Civil Aviation Organization","funders":"","keywords":"Aviation; Aircraft maintenance; Engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Systems engineering; Aviation accident; Construction engineering; Transport engineering; Engineering management; Aeronautics; Business","score_opus":0.23395901901936386,"score_gpt":0.5411481027209928,"score_spread":0.3071890837016289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1878151390","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002839353,0.9957235,0.00026940423,0.00035272655,0.0011387361,0.0019082873,0.000047679336,0.00003648089,0.00023923918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00019786133,0.9979125,0.00053519243,0.00015848964,0.00056630437,0.00020120858,0.00003411826,0.000107654625,0.0002866214],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902061,0.0011716912,0.0056446106,0.00039141029,0.0010973202,0.0014888719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941549,0.0021334388,0.0018600872,0.0005324754,0.0007442309,0.00057487853],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015915362,0.00064121396,0.0044755326,0.001249377,0.0000937355,0.000012829243,0.0008551522,0.0006365022,0.00009031713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008160229,0.0004921736,0.00063435355,0.0014815715,0.000034583903,0.0002997904,0.0001827109,0.0062923585,0.00004799017],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007921501,0.00027270484,0.004225539,0.83882725,0.00019140667,0.0005713561,0.0012875599,0.002449828,0.000001831366,0.0037013288,0.013961189,0.13443078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084936735,0.00009092628,0.003767749,0.30602133,0.000046332647,0.000029328909,0.00011799369,0.00009852391,2.3603453e-8,0.00003978223,0.6885403,0.00039834966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018262447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000786404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6745791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003672691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023897532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963898649","doi":"10.1108/13552510610654510","title":"Human error in maintenance: a review","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Quality and Safety in Healthcare","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":194,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Human error; Listing (finance); Risk analysis (engineering); Human reliability; Originality; Order (exchange); Reliability (semiconductor); Human resources; Value (mathematics); Engineering; Reliability engineering; Computer science; Business; Management; Psychology","score_opus":0.23900067830948088,"score_gpt":0.5429668015626707,"score_spread":0.30396612325318983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963898649","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000059535625,0.99352473,0.00029547542,0.002015865,0.0015840743,0.0018197843,0.00008054045,0.00004284806,0.0005771723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00007078863,0.99617934,0.00068525993,0.001078583,0.00086091505,0.00020152166,0.00003492534,0.00011192595,0.00077676435],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98458844,0.0033183072,0.009341265,0.00048146906,0.0007879624,0.0014825488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923669,0.0018906657,0.0041913185,0.00077458355,0.00050448277,0.00027201508],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018561807,0.00075608457,0.006074607,0.00092285295,0.00015957373,0.00001304027,0.000998622,0.0009911276,0.00011693013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004010007,0.00060580997,0.0010663568,0.0013900159,0.00007042199,0.00026971716,0.00016692441,0.0076177726,0.000057111698],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031118,0.00022728706,0.0004534799,0.87111115,0.00011085607,0.0007010627,0.0011704521,0.0004387747,8.4509156e-7,0.010535422,0.019857425,0.095362104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005309752,0.000041140473,0.000668837,0.39355662,0.00007565689,0.00005520381,0.00028005187,0.0000143610105,1.12830705e-8,0.00022599738,0.60415834,0.00039280351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006577023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00078288803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5843009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028808306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013369565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968862017","doi":"10.1108/13552510510601339","title":"Artificial neural networks for reliability maximization under budget and weight constraints","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Artificial neural network; Mathematical optimization; Maximization; Computer science; Integer programming; Computation; Linear programming; Hopfield network; Power (physics); Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.013196477595588486,"score_gpt":0.24687446208759473,"score_spread":0.23367798449200625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968862017","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2186526,0.0002295343,0.77925724,0.001000126,0.00056159706,0.00020780646,0.00000630872,0.000051228883,0.000033560398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9711674,0.0002759605,0.028069086,0.000097508775,0.00033739905,0.000011173156,0.0000044630947,0.000028681425,0.000008367009],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983176,0.00004208807,0.0009771734,0.00015698244,0.00015649125,0.000349651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912333,0.00027024376,0.00015845831,0.0001505475,0.00019944101,0.00009800216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015409893,0.0001863801,0.0003766653,0.00014218583,0.000032979082,0.000043850574,0.00012157719,0.00014007997,0.0000105264935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005919924,0.00017580163,0.00010246828,0.00019613765,0.00007934163,0.00045103978,0.000016111158,0.00036034654,4.1089288e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056847723,0.00002937154,0.0004291154,0.00010779888,0.000015169885,0.0000015999701,0.00015769868,0.98716134,0.00042489343,0.0025477426,0.00012468852,0.008943709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005438998,0.000042526284,0.0046703,0.00010512931,0.000012557008,0.000029498933,0.00011188655,0.9923964,0.0002515663,0.0011263246,0.00050971145,0.00020021008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000027819476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013275366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7525148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024557672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019708174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7168982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976084415","doi":"10.1108/eum0000000006007","title":"Optimizing a mine haul truck wheel motors’ condition monitoring program Use of proportional hazards modeling","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"PricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada); University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Truck; Engineering; Work (physics); Automotive engineering; Reliability engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.03870898229259323,"score_gpt":0.33736793804282655,"score_spread":0.2986589557502333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976084415","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84102756,0.00029559742,0.15769744,0.00007753486,0.0003709342,0.000281374,0.000008619478,0.00021407999,0.000026854805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8652929,0.00042387153,0.13394128,0.0000074836757,0.00022337059,0.000047225305,0.0000043304294,0.00005198896,0.0000075596904],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728906,0.000046323115,0.0015568401,0.00016526948,0.00051828317,0.00042424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883735,0.00014956757,0.00033807196,0.00022371137,0.00032953863,0.00012178699],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011790692,0.00028203244,0.0006116294,0.00051440625,0.000024621819,0.000059092446,0.00024138563,0.00014212928,0.00001016288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006650441,0.00028056445,0.00020905258,0.0004085269,0.000028395174,0.0008537836,0.00003556854,0.0006428312,5.5504745e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037088423,0.0001295961,0.011380406,0.0002850914,0.000061029394,0.00006373848,0.000321123,0.9701047,0.01406593,0.00018020712,0.00006595815,0.003305155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007018559,0.00013174726,0.013532119,0.0017183183,0.000024827255,0.0001381735,0.0001296866,0.97526854,0.007350419,0.00014543619,0.0005054108,0.00035347842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000073038726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000103738375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024265334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038234988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004267296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977484917","doi":"10.1108/13552510110695574","title":"Reliability analysis of triple modular computer systems with redundant voters and restricted maintenance","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Redundancy (engineering); Triple modular redundancy; Modular design; Reliability engineering; Mean time between failures; Reliability (semiconductor); Computer science; Engineering; Failure rate; Operating system; Physics","score_opus":0.011545792396580433,"score_gpt":0.23296035213612992,"score_spread":0.2214145597395495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977484917","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7528933,0.0000967973,0.24639343,0.00023961163,0.00021964358,0.000100239726,0.000002339321,0.000022401024,0.000032222346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99497324,0.00006635808,0.0045819166,0.00008289814,0.00023143373,0.0000031412312,0.0000029896223,0.000019444038,0.000038555383],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978221,0.00005889169,0.0011648573,0.000250084,0.0003822037,0.00032187428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978347,0.00018617358,0.0010865805,0.00033735152,0.00052416755,0.000031036874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020569237,0.0002117326,0.0009274274,0.0010767459,0.000039319442,0.000075556454,0.00026361746,0.00006411535,0.0000051583656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007835369,0.00016382812,0.00019198013,0.0026192567,0.00008728723,0.0008317224,0.00006500458,0.00031732282,5.211894e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000331886,0.00006597047,0.019875776,0.00022115,0.00040347973,0.000097024626,0.00009559503,0.9731526,0.0008971986,0.004532688,0.00004157507,0.00028507036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011342864,0.000045917102,0.16205904,0.00064053637,0.0005409482,0.00003309626,0.00045217018,0.832869,0.00001518974,0.0004570501,0.0014558253,0.0002969519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000346226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003905941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24207994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014745776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018174853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6680717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977513378","doi":"10.1108/13552511111157371","title":"Simulation‐based approach to joint production and preventive maintenance scheduling on a failure‐prone machine","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms","field":"Engineering","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Preventive maintenance; Tardiness; Corrective maintenance; Scheduling (production processes); Production (economics); Maintenance actions; Operations research; Due date; Computer science; Reliability engineering; Proactive maintenance; Context (archaeology); Operations management; Job shop scheduling; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Business; Schedule; Economics","score_opus":0.03720795776466069,"score_gpt":0.2596485919597839,"score_spread":0.22244063419512322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977513378","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13597858,0.000113456146,0.862889,0.00017149295,0.0003995264,0.00022483397,0.0000033908827,0.00008328523,0.00013641482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6706087,0.000011436648,0.32919112,0.000045716428,0.00008795182,0.000009614952,0.0000010420625,0.00002762812,0.00001680077],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846214,0.000051932893,0.00072662276,0.00020414464,0.00025858733,0.0002965616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921614,0.00010689828,0.00016374903,0.00018506788,0.0001923118,0.00013584482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013426817,0.00021642736,0.00037089176,0.00042080996,0.000031787415,0.000028742152,0.00013074875,0.000079486665,0.000006118411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017291526,0.00019855282,0.000078375684,0.00042459826,0.000021228774,0.00022435859,0.000018568178,0.00047122248,0.0000026870564],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057984817,0.00008055363,0.00016482186,0.00013389219,0.000028781484,0.0000052439505,0.0012353152,0.9964874,0.0007636936,0.00038636575,0.000010578636,0.0006453604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005670658,0.00008113766,0.0031463085,0.00066463713,0.000010978101,0.000012606671,0.00035474892,0.9925751,0.002229964,0.00007323765,0.00003787491,0.00024632888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006687837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000032626347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5346301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018850213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002165288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8096749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978626708","doi":"10.1108/jqme-10-2012-0035","title":"Optimal lockout/tagout, preventive maintenance, human error and production policies of manufacturing systems with passive redundancy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"","keywords":"Preventive maintenance; Reliability engineering; Corrective maintenance; Maintenance actions; Redundancy (engineering); Engineering; Markov chain; Production (economics); Operations research; Computer science","score_opus":0.009276134657986743,"score_gpt":0.24030392307087436,"score_spread":0.23102778841288762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978626708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8668077,0.00019421864,0.13180402,0.00020725641,0.0004854035,0.00028794518,0.0000055270048,0.000052933745,0.00015499776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924626,0.00020088177,0.006984149,0.000008502646,0.00017335977,0.00001593887,0.0000021137753,0.000043572923,0.00010892003],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789894,0.00008935491,0.0010734258,0.0002132282,0.00031486413,0.0004102114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987883,0.00010428453,0.0004760195,0.00025352032,0.0002794044,0.00009845125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012761308,0.0002757172,0.00067154685,0.00031995485,0.00004580387,0.000043478285,0.00018600098,0.00010923986,0.0000022371803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039261385,0.00022634414,0.00009245997,0.00023175566,0.00011488282,0.00048467476,0.000032240572,0.00045854432,4.108714e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006625594,0.00003767845,0.0006112062,0.00089905784,0.00006893871,0.000006368707,0.0012354751,0.9906077,0.0043935413,0.0014709238,0.000097795615,0.0005050828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009434757,0.0024316807,0.20146218,0.022111032,0.0003465303,0.0013164814,0.016306002,0.6405675,0.09574307,0.0020421557,0.0048936955,0.0033449223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000054953685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020201398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3500402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023928947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025701438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9230046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991467588","doi":"10.1108/13552510910997751","title":"Production control of hybrid repair and remanufacturing systems under general conditions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Sustainable Supply Chain Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Remanufacturing; Production (economics); Exponential distribution; Control (management); Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Point (geometry); Reliability engineering; Variety (cybernetics); Process (computing); Exponential function; Variable (mathematics); Operations research; Inventory control; Industrial engineering; Engineering; Manufacturing engineering; Mathematics; Economics; Statistics","score_opus":0.011473470588539224,"score_gpt":0.23826936292138964,"score_spread":0.2267958923328504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991467588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9654212,0.00028608483,0.03092083,0.0023181974,0.0006080752,0.00026513106,0.000001262657,0.0000468978,0.00013230238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984614,0.000024306768,0.00046358464,0.00028087726,0.0006707376,0.0000039152205,0.000001468687,0.000012012244,0.00008165893],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985641,0.000023590774,0.0007557596,0.00014412569,0.00026537743,0.00024701882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989976,0.000053156105,0.0005223066,0.00015847741,0.0002528328,0.000015574999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018703692,0.00013725943,0.00035882884,0.00047804372,0.00003709397,0.000064853455,0.000117564654,0.00002621898,0.00000458261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052124745,0.00012679189,0.00009108913,0.00021700139,0.000025316513,0.0007911065,0.000026608708,0.00019961628,7.3637324e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068147514,0.00007400176,0.0030078266,0.0008203937,0.00006960271,0.00008090749,0.0000654419,0.9444442,0.0031842755,0.047084823,0.0008620215,0.00023839867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0061544036,0.000170187,0.5816419,0.0028131816,0.00027523495,0.00030163117,0.008097281,0.36742774,0.0013320536,0.018489413,0.012112465,0.0011844978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008441771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000031285451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5786341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014581329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014518721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5170423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991651351","doi":"10.1108/13552510410526839","title":"Maintenance management – an AHP application for centralization/decentralization","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Analytic hierarchy process; Decentralization; Process (computing); Process management; Organizational structure; Management science; Engineering; Operations research; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Operations management; Business; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.010508687688687719,"score_gpt":0.2572392669741839,"score_spread":0.24673057928549622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991651351","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050774336,0.000094629206,0.9474365,0.0003313101,0.0005952375,0.00053205027,0.000009522789,0.00010368961,0.0001227183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9301597,0.0009770602,0.06843912,0.00009575595,0.00014952112,0.00006308523,0.000033040098,0.000055717996,0.000027039643],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980959,0.00002621629,0.0009880161,0.00019173554,0.0002543121,0.00044377998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990841,0.000043700617,0.00021965163,0.00025311243,0.00028190317,0.000117492156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010303386,0.00021082688,0.00033666776,0.00023775669,0.000037812242,0.00004474569,0.00026703853,0.00010697045,0.0000037075565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018531561,0.00020959934,0.00011562451,0.00043921595,0.000027206894,0.0006902695,0.000013042964,0.00018918098,0.0000018289431],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000427307,0.00007470023,0.00019632847,0.00034218328,0.000025114217,0.000004344399,0.00039327197,0.9341992,0.0013782609,0.060816545,0.00011898081,0.0024083178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007744075,0.00025429815,0.018426334,0.0014127201,0.00007398042,0.00007097976,0.0012624853,0.9215443,0.0039210445,0.023745855,0.020470737,0.0010731474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011987192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025913776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87938535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006684473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031589523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8547213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994121331","doi":"10.1108/13552510310493738","title":"Availability modeling and optimization of reconfigurable manufacturing systems","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Optimization and Packing Problems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","funders":"","keywords":"Control reconfiguration; Mathematical optimization; Integer programming; Linear programming; Computer science; Production (economics); Reliability engineering; Component (thermodynamics); Failure rate; Basis (linear algebra); Stochastic programming; Robust optimization; Engineering; Mathematics; Embedded system","score_opus":0.02289221077093223,"score_gpt":0.23764739873515703,"score_spread":0.2147551879642248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994121331","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2561338,0.0008669951,0.7417042,0.000020008925,0.00050704787,0.000097701166,0.0000023114128,0.000034544704,0.00063335005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786188,0.0004691844,0.020848166,0.0000047437693,0.000020022371,0.0000018790419,5.5925966e-7,0.000019935915,0.00001668447],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986847,0.00005466,0.0008530773,0.00008377085,0.00014301621,0.00018077373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947363,0.00009016882,0.00015356737,0.00011616428,0.00010674092,0.000059719016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001564567,0.00012071817,0.00033497837,0.00018126644,0.000014022986,0.000028181792,0.00007556009,0.00007234551,0.00001355403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029045937,0.00011809819,0.000046380836,0.00013048116,0.00001211962,0.00024539104,0.000004447143,0.00023831597,3.238997e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005433297,0.000009523174,0.00031358356,0.00042168173,0.00001648792,0.0000016750787,0.00025505797,0.9975483,0.00061878405,0.0007104513,0.00000747559,0.000091568116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003810254,0.00001578279,0.0001254867,0.00039396467,0.00000574032,0.000032356296,0.00022321987,0.9967077,0.0017928518,0.000065342225,0.0001296503,0.00012689801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012415091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016270299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72248507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009541213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016938173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48159045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996204213","doi":"10.1108/13552510110407087","title":"Genetic algorithms for reliability assessment of mining equipment","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Reliability engineering; Genetic algorithm; Computer science; Algorithm; Engineering; Machine learning","score_opus":0.022284099874276618,"score_gpt":0.30768453870495727,"score_spread":0.28540043883068067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996204213","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.624083,0.00034584216,0.3744202,0.00008167702,0.00079141377,0.00016651007,0.000008837849,0.00003238382,0.00007015776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8613717,0.00043851804,0.13797514,0.000009494102,0.00014565853,0.000018102748,9.741256e-7,0.000032615706,0.00000779356],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777335,0.000028104327,0.001357006,0.00014843061,0.00030306162,0.00039005236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984802,0.0006960832,0.00019863257,0.0002683539,0.0002451025,0.00011165485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020366695,0.00020899883,0.00058058207,0.00020695067,0.0000151826525,0.000015484105,0.00025159496,0.00010596634,0.000009087364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009196403,0.00019387531,0.00020891974,0.0002645199,0.000030870535,0.00011376772,0.00002837239,0.00032134575,2.554415e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012452847,0.00008041863,0.014746819,0.0005567544,0.000042507254,0.000015619735,0.00020275838,0.9790463,0.003257576,0.00029784997,0.000098408505,0.0016425366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011881484,0.00020438571,0.25698903,0.000642291,0.000028200657,0.00003984672,0.00021556736,0.73734623,0.0007808423,0.0003165252,0.0019147818,0.0003341166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000096755175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000042763104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24224223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031733201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055474546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7906006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000625936","doi":"10.1108/13552510510616478","title":"Fuzzy set‐valued and grey filtering statistical inferences on a system operating data","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Schedule; Reliability engineering; Fuzzy logic; Probabilistic logic; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Fuzzy set; Failure rate; Function (biology); Operations research; Production (economics); Product (mathematics); Industrial engineering; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.040525353149743,"score_gpt":0.2963117320154809,"score_spread":0.2557863788657379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000625936","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53658205,0.00040544357,0.46057397,0.000401851,0.00068410503,0.0002193446,0.000066662134,0.00014849345,0.00091805385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9409643,0.00017448884,0.05858573,0.000032823737,0.00019891483,0.0000041564576,0.000007615745,0.000024526136,0.0000074369314],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982266,0.00006758772,0.0009206359,0.00019500825,0.0002630538,0.0003271137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990847,0.00026885496,0.00012980564,0.00030665542,0.00009933312,0.000110652305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018893243,0.00019952112,0.00042640546,0.00016843971,0.000035696452,0.00009823575,0.00030471565,0.00008463663,0.0000056329895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009683855,0.00017509835,0.00003363393,0.00016841265,0.00003240343,0.00065568055,0.00007173855,0.00047997764,0.0000030737215],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002255981,0.000017545575,0.00033963955,0.00043841492,0.000027302429,0.000023164954,0.00057178375,0.9820744,0.0011339254,0.011237904,0.00016477419,0.003948587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006674097,0.000086750035,0.004085224,0.0012934699,0.000012429805,0.00009240425,0.0010528022,0.991669,0.00016489101,0.00008741131,0.0005242884,0.00026389695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018670145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021357026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40438223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025322227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029984061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7140304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002768319","doi":"10.1108/13552510910997715","title":"Feasibility study of using statistical process control to optimize quality assurance in radiotherapy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre d'expertise et de recherche en infrastructures urbaines","funders":"","keywords":"Quality assurance; Statistical process control; Control chart; Reliability (semiconductor); Reliability engineering; Quality (philosophy); Computer science; Process (computing); Head and neck; Control (management); Radiation therapy; Medicine; Medical physics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Surgery","score_opus":0.02742654696187762,"score_gpt":0.38650701569890605,"score_spread":0.3590804687370284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002768319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50542665,0.000044187545,0.4941038,0.00007530346,0.000037303384,0.00028949228,0.000010246646,0.00000735249,0.0000056648737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88864505,0.000005300263,0.11119664,0.0000533385,0.000076563316,0.0000067258834,2.9505074e-7,0.000014307534,0.0000017663809],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974675,0.00023892343,0.001423903,0.00020990564,0.00033946594,0.00032026175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859315,0.00035678913,0.0005126826,0.00024313311,0.00020048404,0.000093750954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002409377,0.00019938398,0.000873283,0.00019853089,0.000016434637,0.000016758615,0.00026720666,0.00004144789,0.000017944669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002765737,0.00018233982,0.00008663469,0.00038339815,0.00002392193,0.00025321502,0.0000073147226,0.00042607947,5.190592e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006532963,0.0012117086,0.2754036,0.000052802054,0.00004892295,0.000012243963,0.0021309622,0.7024832,0.014461489,0.0012394015,0.000005088834,0.0022973332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010478252,0.0010416816,0.9345532,0.0006733753,0.000018456243,0.000008714189,0.0023178796,0.045946147,0.0015641036,0.0027459385,0.000029877587,0.00062238134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014198397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009459729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6591496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030391238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000080403246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7435602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002779342","doi":"10.1108/13552510710829498","title":"Availability analysis of a generalized maintainable three‐state device parallel system with human error and common‐cause failures","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Redundancy (engineering); Reliability engineering; Common cause failure; Human error; Computer science; Reliability (semiconductor); Failure mode and effects analysis; State (computer science); Markov chain; Engineering; Common cause and special cause; Distributed computing; Algorithm; Operations management","score_opus":0.01860619051724609,"score_gpt":0.27286155454051225,"score_spread":0.25425536402326615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002779342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.679459,0.0002112921,0.31994703,0.000055199096,0.00006313782,0.00016029492,0.0000068239797,0.00004663044,0.00005062963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790582,0.00006521767,0.020781746,0.000015257557,0.000026106818,0.00000652497,0.000003871031,0.000029908646,0.0000131632205],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973888,0.0000738639,0.0014972816,0.00020050196,0.0003713665,0.00046822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998509,0.0002309024,0.00041467993,0.00033963012,0.00036262383,0.00014317734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041076723,0.00026443021,0.000991635,0.0005931137,0.0000422942,0.000036920977,0.00022342791,0.00011561795,0.000005678316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019022622,0.00021878106,0.0001685401,0.0010474375,0.00009376165,0.00033967255,0.000033802167,0.00043337807,3.0563405e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016636262,0.000043967986,0.0343556,0.0007933625,0.0005225957,0.000053686366,0.0006612332,0.9562614,0.0018907528,0.0051059593,0.000008964757,0.00013614335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021350496,0.00019597974,0.34369975,0.0008262109,0.00042578846,0.00007012251,0.0019332168,0.6490245,0.0006704866,0.00033489734,0.00015498642,0.00052903296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005031192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029963355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30934414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042743597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029893923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8921633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020088934","doi":"10.1108/13552511111157399","title":"Maintenance/production planning with interactive feedback of product quality","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Production (economics); Quality (philosophy); Product (mathematics); Control (management); Preventive maintenance; Maintenance actions; Point (geometry); Reliability engineering; Value (mathematics); Operations research; Computer science; Originality; Production planning; Optimal maintenance; Engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Economics; Mathematics; Business","score_opus":0.029699906106271972,"score_gpt":0.2635196073782785,"score_spread":0.23381970127200655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020088934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8543671,0.00031528526,0.14245483,0.00014494665,0.0011999381,0.0002952056,0.0000063059956,0.000089800524,0.0011265941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734071,0.00020722374,0.026133621,0.00001654351,0.00013737731,0.000010466154,0.0000018666764,0.00004492454,0.0000408809],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99738175,0.00009439876,0.0014650561,0.0002505668,0.0003703026,0.00043795284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824464,0.0001280977,0.0005933815,0.00036848136,0.00056809373,0.00009727849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023447822,0.00028929827,0.0007234443,0.00034287016,0.000023516444,0.000016891105,0.00029028466,0.0000932772,0.000017933582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011778631,0.00023776945,0.00014376784,0.0005684874,0.00010181044,0.00083032966,0.000029305884,0.00068350835,0.0000018248196],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069261534,0.00018416058,0.008668237,0.0007685509,0.00014443444,0.00003181417,0.006176943,0.9689049,0.0110320775,0.0015004934,0.00024875454,0.0016470327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0074567194,0.0016378688,0.7371537,0.013924457,0.0001895067,0.0008432834,0.01921734,0.07354379,0.13816042,0.0031129161,0.0018093874,0.002950612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000061408224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001974208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8953611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033669377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056476612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9695957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022687135","doi":"10.1108/13552510310493747","title":"Probabilistic safety analysis of maintainable systems","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Risk and Safety Analysis","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability engineering; Probabilistic logic; Reliability (semiconductor); Failure mode and effects analysis; Mode (computer interface); Common cause failure; Computer science; Engineering; Statistical model; State (computer science); Common cause and special cause; Operations management; Algorithm","score_opus":0.05879644741064032,"score_gpt":0.3584788640851771,"score_spread":0.29968241667453677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022687135","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6033553,0.0009140466,0.3934817,0.00055339286,0.0005348507,0.00014317856,0.000021099122,0.000010045996,0.0009863918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99695915,0.00016345872,0.0025313227,0.000017483238,0.000027385555,0.0000018516763,6.6183344e-7,0.00000767167,0.00029100807],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99454325,0.00057174853,0.0029844136,0.0002273876,0.0013330173,0.00034020244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949917,0.0021304518,0.0012736085,0.00051596767,0.00096086354,0.00012736929],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02199345,0.00015612265,0.001307258,0.0015547534,0.000037230107,0.000069509726,0.00058939244,0.00008279767,0.00007281851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019886937,0.00011166887,0.00061812205,0.004798186,0.00005642199,0.0003071837,0.00003114753,0.00031268017,0.000003938578],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045157056,0.00005480838,0.0119266715,0.000029575087,0.00032288113,0.000025625242,0.00041273003,0.9242564,0.00016775448,0.06228888,0.000053011656,0.00041652579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018787719,0.00022709342,0.26968846,0.00046817726,0.0011741742,0.000097315824,0.016157633,0.65702105,0.00019956316,0.03268796,0.019652888,0.0007469423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010744875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005877651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39360386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026926107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012122805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.988369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022726105","doi":"10.1108/13552510810861932","title":"Optimal disassembly sequencing strategy using constraint programming approach","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Manufacturing Process and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical optimization; Maintainability; Computer science; Constraint programming; Process (computing); Linear programming; Engineering; Reliability engineering; Algorithm; Stochastic programming; Mathematics","score_opus":0.049980870288825564,"score_gpt":0.2713092925294812,"score_spread":0.22132842224065566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022726105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5482995,0.00018422001,0.45113248,0.0000068838226,0.00014321292,0.00006605417,0.0000011642421,0.000053493637,0.00011297168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8812948,0.00009739889,0.118431374,0.000007233414,0.00012382244,0.0000034048917,0.0000014075714,0.000033598215,0.000006970509],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830353,0.000027951259,0.00084327604,0.00013300509,0.000278597,0.00041360973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994193,0.00005743245,0.0001871016,0.00012525138,0.00010276248,0.00010817705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075993245,0.00021705695,0.00040940428,0.00023057184,0.00004747967,0.00004544185,0.00018873606,0.00009973965,0.0000043795185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012841349,0.00020635882,0.00010845006,0.00026312296,0.00004304067,0.000423708,0.000018789908,0.00047797305,4.7648072e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009368416,0.00001979806,0.00027547727,0.00027769295,0.000027915472,0.00007023848,0.00090774056,0.9947289,0.0025313548,0.00019863628,0.000006018807,0.0009468232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049380295,0.000033979926,0.0012848059,0.00027663365,0.000010319973,0.000666268,0.000998239,0.99330044,0.0025300132,0.000015081935,0.00009354182,0.00029688395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018973617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014250024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33299527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004091845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008630782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84150684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027134703","doi":"10.1108/13552511111157362","title":"Production control of unreliable manufacturing systems producing defective items","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Supply Chain and Inventory Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure; Université Laval; Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Production (economics); Discrete event simulation; Reliability engineering; Control (management); Production line; Computer science; Exponential function; Intersection (aeronautics); Product (mathematics); Production manager; Industrial engineering; Event (particle physics); Productivity; Operations research; Engineering; Mathematics; Simulation; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.031342669841227876,"score_gpt":0.22441484321620195,"score_spread":0.19307217337497407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027134703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9627377,0.00032975557,0.031037806,0.00019313945,0.003635634,0.0004537314,9.3806796e-7,0.000042931806,0.001568409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986651,0.000017756667,0.00032685732,0.00007032553,0.0008025787,0.000011009167,5.647684e-7,0.000021619187,0.00008418464],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829644,0.000027287091,0.00090307824,0.00018006859,0.00030873754,0.00028439309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986663,0.00004820088,0.00080971327,0.00020400921,0.00025627826,0.000015510213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002921449,0.00016278352,0.00042128397,0.0005060023,0.0000304114,0.000044487646,0.00022053409,0.000045892746,0.000018700379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070588896,0.00014253058,0.00011524568,0.00027348945,0.000025459536,0.0010121092,0.000044851404,0.00024987242,0.000005473875],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085175614,0.00080818456,0.10250314,0.007930205,0.00056219153,0.00013020558,0.004325892,0.7984418,0.018943816,0.06076194,0.0021755928,0.002565241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012060654,0.00044814925,0.7275857,0.014880201,0.00057719985,0.00015798783,0.025195763,0.13169584,0.037449654,0.008062316,0.038897995,0.0029885888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054020394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011862119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66674596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014351743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014139828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58122283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031614523","doi":"10.1108/13552511311315968","title":"Risk based integrity modeling of offshore process components suffering stochastic degradation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability engineering; Component (thermodynamics); Process (computing); Degradation (telecommunications); Gamma process; Computer science; Submarine pipeline; Bayesian probability; Stochastic process; Engineering; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.022439706228943312,"score_gpt":0.254651612657843,"score_spread":0.23221190642889966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031614523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51265705,0.000060866438,0.4868547,0.0000468037,0.0002004594,0.00013086508,0.0000041223516,0.000030235959,0.000014900484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850879,0.00006620819,0.014734886,0.000010025927,0.000047824677,0.0000147258515,0.0000038778144,0.000031612635,0.0000029757928],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.997883,0.00006457062,0.0012361098,0.00013789613,0.00035589674,0.0003225024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986951,0.00018792193,0.0003186372,0.00020048291,0.0005028986,0.000094992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013791418,0.0002147266,0.00051529496,0.0003121577,0.000023632536,0.000030956435,0.00025388048,0.00012435818,0.0000151787535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011364549,0.00019725348,0.00013311283,0.0003603813,0.00003011996,0.00059886475,0.000016792177,0.00076545234,0.0000017441317],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022159596,0.00005002234,0.0020900636,0.00045767368,0.00002434969,0.0000013824805,0.0003886065,0.9933375,0.0029558614,0.00011278572,0.000009691536,0.0005498638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006119759,0.000034927172,0.010271534,0.00078809157,0.000013548181,0.000006220323,0.00041153608,0.98653245,0.00059920625,0.00053335674,0.0000030638462,0.00019406521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011476918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000116275005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47243083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002566988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041989257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80437636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032050708","doi":"10.1108/13552510510601311","title":"Joint optimal periodic and conditional maintenance strategy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure; Université de Montréal; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical optimization; Erlang (programming language); Block (permutation group theory); Time horizon; Steady state (chemistry); Expected value; Computer science; Reliability engineering; Engineering; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.015813293019501694,"score_gpt":0.24432584496495027,"score_spread":0.2285125519454486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032050708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.746983,0.0009048271,0.25004977,0.0010209238,0.00037433062,0.00016236467,0.000016668067,0.000088232344,0.0003998528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781936,0.00080194906,0.020581465,0.00009235215,0.00022716052,0.000008076304,0.000003818698,0.00003095595,0.000060665643],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980964,0.000037973332,0.0010096863,0.00016220183,0.00027161237,0.00042214652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992551,0.00009526547,0.00017104862,0.00015591724,0.00018096635,0.00014166022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012046533,0.00023001895,0.0004607695,0.00023334626,0.00003320088,0.00006228011,0.00015579289,0.00011628508,0.000039931645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036258542,0.00021418075,0.00011473299,0.00021401432,0.00008300423,0.0006392108,0.000025158959,0.0005628273,0.000005371101],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002584854,0.000031014817,0.00023308107,0.00013306718,0.000025443564,0.000022209419,0.00037998162,0.98818225,0.0034451499,0.004816737,0.00053978193,0.002165466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023365386,0.00016688515,0.041673515,0.00071360695,0.000021409505,0.00053591066,0.0009734352,0.9420781,0.001646393,0.0009970693,0.008192812,0.000664282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006311226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010860093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23121054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003276685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004772059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8734037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033331083","doi":"10.1108/13552510710735122","title":"Using GenRel for reliability assessment of mining equipment","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Belt Conveyor Systems Engineering","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Reliability engineering; Genetic algorithm; Data mining; Computer science; Engineering; Machine learning","score_opus":0.052949103004672614,"score_gpt":0.35156608125948885,"score_spread":0.29861697825481626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033331083","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4967804,0.0002077335,0.5018588,0.000012532975,0.0008813058,0.00014714745,0.0000041167873,0.000033237073,0.00007472954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8307557,0.00001706679,0.1689901,0.0000064702804,0.00017113057,0.0000051543666,5.844998e-7,0.000048487662,0.0000052575692],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968738,0.000030071194,0.0020038732,0.00015120779,0.00039145036,0.0005496264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983768,0.00058926985,0.00036474125,0.000271948,0.00026804427,0.0001291859],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006562742,0.00024864526,0.00072427734,0.00043543466,0.00001791124,0.000016364922,0.00027812223,0.00013126065,0.000004187071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005947243,0.00025477487,0.00022648239,0.00036005463,0.000023043052,0.00025546187,0.000033003027,0.00038540873,1.5923763e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020213358,0.000030660187,0.004420658,0.0010582599,0.000063026026,0.000014517533,0.0005063181,0.88836896,0.10398857,0.0008894007,0.000024435276,0.0006149903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018065883,0.00012624144,0.053551894,0.001669958,0.00003925019,0.000095016505,0.001314816,0.9244,0.01577261,0.000073448384,0.000611943,0.00053823454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001585042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008813334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33397534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007819711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000072499504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036901142","doi":"10.1108/13552511311315977","title":"Vibration‐ and acoustic‐emissions based novelty detection of fretted bearings","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Novelty detection; Fault detection and isolation; Novelty; Engineering; Feature vector; Vibration; Feature (linguistics); Fault (geology); Acoustic emission; Pattern recognition (psychology); Principal component analysis; Dimensionality reduction; Condition monitoring; Reduction (mathematics); Identification (biology); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Acoustics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0120034111469476,"score_gpt":0.24681536769942766,"score_spread":0.23481195655248005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036901142","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19529238,0.000018677358,0.8037998,0.00072736107,0.00004744049,0.000070994734,5.8653256e-7,0.000026738466,0.00001601862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91313714,0.000010147426,0.086733736,0.00007464801,0.000020970334,0.00000868805,9.0614265e-8,0.0000041636476,0.000010433739],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917465,0.000020599067,0.00046505604,0.0000917067,0.00013831539,0.00010966568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923265,0.00011442417,0.0002609769,0.0001511254,0.00018160585,0.000059196667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046250556,0.00006932105,0.00015522195,0.00016603353,0.000029713268,0.000035197092,0.00019046057,0.000049008286,0.0000046912814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023046641,0.00006134105,0.000045892448,0.00031369994,0.00001863355,0.0003769621,0.000035991638,0.00019558404,5.649658e-7],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004775765,0.00005219534,0.00052732334,0.00005867429,0.000008595662,0.0000013421021,0.00019747578,0.021482568,0.96540576,0.0035620998,0.000066367575,0.008632805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004125382,0.00010740715,0.11485816,0.00018227013,0.0000052847654,0.00003396526,0.00008191679,0.7685704,0.113795914,0.0014759606,0.00031447416,0.00016166201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000056113873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000037274801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8516099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049763497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026667289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25014156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041759495","doi":"10.1108/13552510810861923","title":"Optimal inspection and preventive maintenance policy for systems with self‐announcing and non‐self‐announcing failures","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Uniqueness; Preventive maintenance; Originality; Idle; Order (exchange); Computer science; Value (mathematics); Reliability engineering; Optimal maintenance; Operations research; Mathematical optimization; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Mathematics; Economics; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.007945176398540704,"score_gpt":0.2233356510639563,"score_spread":0.2153904746654156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041759495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7063717,0.00061611563,0.29182008,0.00023404985,0.0002972994,0.00044373155,0.000009718823,0.000148022,0.000059253685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9507684,0.0015414205,0.047266126,0.000022646645,0.0002840585,0.000040034465,0.0000019242902,0.000051963325,0.000023439614],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980035,0.00004711518,0.0008789912,0.00025576513,0.00029915816,0.0005155088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987537,0.00021988564,0.00028637802,0.0001754354,0.00042584562,0.00013871478],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014415503,0.00031263733,0.000642398,0.00036456794,0.000117531,0.00007675142,0.00013638884,0.0001378908,3.7510367e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004949161,0.0002687602,0.00008375431,0.00040192498,0.000072935814,0.0007685058,0.000030319296,0.00044438682,2.8753007e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012419374,0.00004640128,0.0023557963,0.0010011187,0.00012095195,0.000032885313,0.0047587347,0.9885747,0.0015490669,0.0011733206,0.0001509386,0.00011188221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036015883,0.0005340788,0.040701397,0.002381536,0.00006354064,0.0014368872,0.0031555349,0.9451885,0.0004926271,0.000115017465,0.0015923062,0.0007369612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014896668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027394504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24455397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072398304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012693416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052776381","doi":"10.1108/13552510510601348","title":"Optimal design of series production lines with unreliable machines and finite buffers","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms","field":"Engineering","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université du Québec; Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical optimization; Series (stratigraphy); Production line; Optimal design; Heuristic; Computer science; Production (economics); Constraint (computer-aided design); Ant colony optimization algorithms; Ant colony; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.015711455222996988,"score_gpt":0.2395742402575183,"score_spread":0.2238627850345213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052776381","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36405003,0.0007498601,0.63432,0.00042699784,0.00030553315,0.00007953103,0.0000019268432,0.000048927664,0.000017141729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4726355,0.00048552832,0.5266063,0.000009962919,0.00016423281,0.0000027790072,5.957277e-7,0.000022174825,0.00007290471],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991217,0.000022930482,0.00047292016,0.000078203135,0.00014901662,0.000155199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995057,0.000104846484,0.000119353535,0.00008460518,0.00013884826,0.000046652134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007036846,0.0001262744,0.00026752884,0.00017432697,0.000014661272,0.000017893291,0.00007392368,0.00004610106,0.000006356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003642335,0.00010307701,0.000027540133,0.00022456948,0.000028670145,0.00035461818,0.000007798945,0.00021349853,4.93315e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006919039,0.000014871337,0.0004327341,0.00011840458,0.000027196042,0.000003662178,0.0005222068,0.995973,0.0020580182,0.000033609263,0.00003617294,0.0007109387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005300231,0.000106347026,0.0015191804,0.00045427767,0.000013748011,0.00010278458,0.00033715434,0.9903373,0.006274009,0.000014047329,0.00013833633,0.00017276475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000038973535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000025882848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10858547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004817502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001806661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42033583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052964535","doi":"10.1108/13552511111116268","title":"Mapping the dynamics of overall equipment effectiveness to enhance asset management practices","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Quality and Supply Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Overall equipment effectiveness; Originality; Asset (computer security); Function (biology); Risk analysis (engineering); Asset management; System dynamics; Investment (military); Operations management; Engineering; Business; Computer science; Qualitative research; Economics; Microeconomics; Production (economics); Finance; Computer security","score_opus":0.04665165582430302,"score_gpt":0.2981400312505229,"score_spread":0.2514883754262199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052964535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7902781,0.000081097634,0.20247559,0.002279156,0.0008014568,0.00054520834,0.0000026182838,0.000025195615,0.0035115809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949856,0.0000400985,0.004112898,0.00056916376,0.00017254075,0.000022089951,0.0000016768628,0.000018636481,0.00007728645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790114,0.00008183758,0.0009784347,0.00019007159,0.00049700995,0.00035151356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980064,0.00023815468,0.0012248247,0.00030559607,0.00020343966,0.000021566451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066021057,0.00019427502,0.0004165123,0.00044845496,0.000048000897,0.00008222357,0.00062033004,0.000044060034,0.000034077642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006523316,0.00014860931,0.00014084796,0.0005748487,0.000031007396,0.0008797576,0.000288725,0.00030586516,0.000011660845],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011703708,0.0010801933,0.034797706,0.009711336,0.0008367979,0.00030585917,0.0044952,0.11135711,0.0023483885,0.8141048,0.001236262,0.018555965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019971835,0.00016231205,0.90636665,0.004650815,0.00015922464,0.000019810439,0.01329794,0.03331582,0.0008389617,0.016373172,0.021769058,0.0010490636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037257775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000104349565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8715689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020580296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001274375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60601115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065809635","doi":"10.1108/13552510410539204","title":"Stochastic analysis of a maintainable robot‐safety system with common‐cause failures","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Common cause failure; Reliability engineering; Variance (accounting); Mean time between failures; Constant (computer programming); Markov model; Robot; Markov chain; Markov process; Variable (mathematics); Engineering; State (computer science); Failure rate; Computer science; Common cause and special cause; Statistics; Mathematics; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Operations management","score_opus":0.0086000420875686,"score_gpt":0.23262024396924885,"score_spread":0.22402020188168026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065809635","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21630377,0.0001490774,0.7829689,0.00016153051,0.00014468578,0.00014351022,0.000010251232,0.00006134092,0.000056967754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98355746,0.000060676342,0.016285442,0.000012154992,0.000034361266,0.0000074317786,0.000004005463,0.000031394662,0.000007059021],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977967,0.00004674169,0.0012453141,0.00014843115,0.00036655253,0.00039625066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878204,0.00017519896,0.0003398087,0.00030889126,0.00028584656,0.000108194785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013771126,0.00023590589,0.00093593774,0.0006911832,0.000026972388,0.000027710857,0.00026278454,0.00010402334,0.000004504408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025624048,0.00019563669,0.00021837086,0.0014434492,0.00005536401,0.00034385556,0.000023177323,0.00041603393,7.5133175e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011745244,0.00004550361,0.00046312946,0.00044833845,0.000569082,0.00004836841,0.0006210567,0.9823286,0.00058524706,0.01469232,0.0000045812894,0.000076312936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023800163,0.00022266645,0.023790998,0.002171287,0.0005504896,0.00012239542,0.0032450906,0.9662823,0.00045756134,0.00023048928,0.00005781094,0.00048888795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015939825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020501035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7672537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008632091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006551359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79778326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070599978","doi":"10.1108/13552511111134619","title":"Reliability and availability analysis of a robot‐safety system","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Backup; Reliability engineering; Robot; Reliability (semiconductor); Process (computing); Engineering; System safety; Markov process; Mean time between failures; Markov chain; Markov model; Computer science; Simulation; Failure rate; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.016369480219774617,"score_gpt":0.22683976336942027,"score_spread":0.21047028314964566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070599978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7389906,0.00025672925,0.25974002,0.000027434864,0.000314846,0.00014916966,0.000015020708,0.000061564075,0.00044461928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9769281,0.00026048115,0.02275583,0.0000066163275,0.000020777476,0.000003992327,0.0000014124979,0.000016663653,0.000006125773],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759674,0.00009941659,0.0016026861,0.0001797399,0.00024336079,0.00027807837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866354,0.00023929826,0.00031084465,0.00036191192,0.00031814864,0.00010622294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035109548,0.00019105247,0.0008729573,0.0004471794,0.000016828835,0.000010599082,0.0002037068,0.00012573173,0.000017769806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009287888,0.00016937287,0.00023862376,0.00096950046,0.00008116002,0.00033523902,0.000033137152,0.0003507407,5.388284e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107375046,0.000059157268,0.014505964,0.0008191143,0.00024700075,0.000007520014,0.0015351622,0.97857434,0.0014208121,0.0022171899,0.000009576763,0.00049681176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055475533,0.00006795371,0.43782654,0.0003624143,0.00021919963,0.000016007569,0.0008775177,0.558949,0.0006709593,0.00014746308,0.000071031594,0.0002371447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000090112284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031799544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42332056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003451518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002721998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69068253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070991662","doi":"10.1108/13552510310466927","title":"Hierarchical control of production and maintenance rates in manufacturing systems","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; École de Technologie Supérieure; Polytechnique Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Preventive maintenance; Optimal control; Production control; Limiting; Mathematical optimization; Production (economics); Reduction (mathematics); Control (management); Optimal maintenance; Stochastic control; Control theory (sociology); Production planning; Engineering; Computer science; Reliability engineering; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.009706710725806434,"score_gpt":0.23311181342613108,"score_spread":0.22340510270032465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070991662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8603343,0.0010735748,0.1371482,0.00018382716,0.00085627654,0.00025593807,0.0000032874848,0.000026861479,0.00011776342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99612284,0.00076643715,0.0029993767,0.000010017344,0.00005034366,0.000009733174,3.686033e-7,0.00002236242,0.000018538112],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980779,0.00011637964,0.0011146181,0.00015144172,0.00020542149,0.00033420342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992527,0.00019591961,0.00020699386,0.00015846919,0.00011571123,0.00007024501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002404055,0.00017906183,0.00055178057,0.00031210383,0.000012961697,0.000022087113,0.000111284826,0.00010150103,0.0000024262874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016140173,0.0001609755,0.00006686264,0.00023439158,0.00005431292,0.00033859556,0.000008836285,0.0004926807,3.3704654e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005020229,0.000033093896,0.0041951416,0.00055957,0.000020343427,0.000014464942,0.00034161177,0.9851527,0.005144526,0.0041918284,0.000024249082,0.00027226572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007033629,0.00032745962,0.14479819,0.008197197,0.00005031762,0.000703605,0.0030484784,0.7964114,0.032410495,0.0036345536,0.002066463,0.0013182086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001927898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015256437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1887413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021535212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027475979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65643907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072863921","doi":"10.1108/13552511111180203","title":"Optimal replacement with minimal repair policy for a system operating over a random time horizon","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Time horizon; Mathematical optimization; Simple (philosophy); Function (biology); Horizon; Reliability engineering; Operations research; Originality; Computer science; Value (mathematics); Operations management; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.012745199050193093,"score_gpt":0.2387178765165174,"score_spread":0.22597267746632432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072863921","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49957207,0.00014240317,0.4986883,0.00007094429,0.00029534547,0.00052540645,0.000010903481,0.00019685294,0.0004977788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84462094,0.000044930897,0.15488872,0.000019953373,0.0002450219,0.00005518809,0.0000023919501,0.000057606692,0.0000652256],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799615,0.000050785162,0.0010679852,0.00018662142,0.00024806272,0.00045041874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990346,0.00015475854,0.00023107846,0.00023959682,0.00022953849,0.00011045515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020945591,0.00024739088,0.00057746295,0.0002641269,0.000036713445,0.000033123626,0.0001823285,0.00010301208,0.000009964433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057501433,0.00020179647,0.00019453849,0.00029939425,0.000028463666,0.00039006522,0.000021622738,0.00029574486,0.0000016734966],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00096805394,0.00005063764,0.00029545792,0.0006925563,0.00011704633,0.000026621121,0.0015633808,0.99175394,0.0022971209,0.0017940665,0.00022996098,0.00021117751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005370901,0.00093286304,0.0018829529,0.0016310061,0.00004211696,0.00015570752,0.001050265,0.9864228,0.0014950127,0.00001944712,0.0005704667,0.00042648363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035547066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000051646402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3450489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006015307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009193993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82290214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074693897","doi":"10.1108/13552510710829489","title":"A comparative study of heuristic algorithms to solve maintenance scheduling problem","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms","field":"Engineering","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Tabu search; Simulated annealing; Heuristics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Scheduling (production processes); Algorithm; Heuristic; Job shop scheduling; Metaheuristic; Schedule; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03140479321001383,"score_gpt":0.31168796674356525,"score_spread":0.2802831735335514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074693897","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45762196,0.00013263604,0.5414482,0.000038050326,0.00041779745,0.00020727566,0.0000027402682,0.000046546324,0.000084775675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7006919,0.00001718778,0.29911295,0.000020228108,0.000113888644,0.0000054921557,5.3606146e-7,0.000027665286,0.000010166921],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971603,0.000034424473,0.0016510414,0.00018293787,0.00046783988,0.00050343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998501,0.00032388532,0.00031041793,0.00022138553,0.00044313818,0.00020016701],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028970132,0.0002623602,0.0007855468,0.0005628331,0.000027798073,0.000029646573,0.00033134824,0.00008478454,0.00000600592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046790732,0.00024841123,0.000110436624,0.00089919794,0.000024483832,0.00019849314,0.00003888397,0.00061474973,0.0000037214295],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065193664,0.00018852645,0.00065560103,0.00011423278,0.000082284336,0.000057842324,0.007351704,0.9888835,0.0015359296,0.00025975524,0.000030960226,0.00077448157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00439665,0.00085962925,0.025603872,0.0018355051,0.00005389129,0.00012274065,0.029245611,0.9326885,0.0039189016,0.00019644389,0.00018599995,0.0008923049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025285764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000039727158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2430699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027152733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036785084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077743873","doi":"10.1108/13552510310503222","title":"Adaptive model for vibration monitoring of rotating machinery subject to random deterioration","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Vibration; Kalman filter; Frequency domain; Control theory (sociology); Condition monitoring; Time domain; SIGNAL (programming language); Engineering; Fault (geology); Fault detection and isolation; State-space representation; Computer science; Control engineering; Artificial intelligence; Algorithm; Acoustics; Computer vision","score_opus":0.02936946893459161,"score_gpt":0.31871750251808356,"score_spread":0.2893480335834919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077743873","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42633158,0.00008155625,0.573132,0.000019807234,0.0001675927,0.00020735885,0.0000048694374,0.000037987695,0.00001725772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73672897,0.000028666693,0.2630972,0.000009707432,0.000059314712,0.000043760487,6.086184e-7,0.000029345712,0.000002462005],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837023,0.000057045152,0.0010046931,0.000108571185,0.00021525552,0.0002441909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990247,0.00036063808,0.00022925007,0.00013078269,0.00018640397,0.00006826172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018844508,0.00017846758,0.00045195868,0.00033006116,0.000018480456,0.00002272964,0.00013952049,0.00007257725,0.0000011389811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015444306,0.0001775115,0.00013034699,0.0002480741,0.000007065436,0.0003533889,0.000010171247,0.0002510185,1.9968714e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007062112,0.00001847613,0.0017935635,0.00015654769,0.00002037162,0.0000016576489,0.0008783725,0.90764636,0.087490164,0.00053975126,0.000025180996,0.0013589597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009624277,0.00010521647,0.003465325,0.00056739023,0.000011348775,0.0000076583865,0.00015163286,0.9291927,0.0648532,0.0004657171,0.000016908676,0.00020047302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008415456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000991654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31039736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001878291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030158795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7238709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082731959","doi":"10.1108/13552511011048896","title":"Proportional hazards modeling of engine failures in military vehicles","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Christian ministry; Covariate; Reliability engineering; Engineering; Markov model; Decision model; Diesel fuel; Hazard; Operations research; Markov chain; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Automotive engineering; Business","score_opus":0.009135250757017778,"score_gpt":0.23933906711570685,"score_spread":0.23020381635868908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082731959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90384215,0.00034039692,0.09476577,0.0002898949,0.00055378716,0.00011293036,0.0000056999165,0.000032152537,0.0000572381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9691837,0.0002393318,0.030425666,0.000011170904,0.00010206134,0.0000060906978,0.0000023527903,0.000024281642,0.000005346369],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979755,0.000028212015,0.0012718821,0.00012033779,0.0003038909,0.00030013002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930483,0.00010114165,0.00012032823,0.00018346278,0.00022050721,0.00006972641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018910952,0.00017088432,0.00044718123,0.00038395738,0.000010623775,0.000008423162,0.00021574195,0.00013769005,0.000012623481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008672714,0.00015998766,0.0001237861,0.00034198372,0.000039611637,0.00039600107,0.000021001344,0.0008187862,6.1207936e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003277813,0.00005068687,0.0017836964,0.00026734854,0.00001493472,0.0000131573815,0.0003955099,0.9729083,0.022415021,0.0012096332,0.000027508862,0.00088137994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006108903,0.00003158387,0.009915088,0.00037329367,0.0000050209705,0.00002762566,0.00023428835,0.986026,0.0016133444,0.0008564592,0.0001295898,0.000176805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000082757455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001669038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06534157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012548213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000065442044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65241075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083665485","doi":"10.1108/13552510810899490","title":"Probabilistic analysis of a repairable robot‐safety system composed of (<i>n</i>−1) standby robots, a safety unit, and a switch","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Robot; Reliability engineering; Reliability (semiconductor); Engineering; Process (computing); Probabilistic logic; Markov process; System safety; Simulation; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.016482154997588642,"score_gpt":0.23158909906306072,"score_spread":0.21510694406547207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083665485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6074352,0.00066851004,0.3911302,0.00006489867,0.00018663215,0.00026601856,0.0000428316,0.000063489446,0.00014221121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980535,0.0009746444,0.018415354,0.000005951981,0.000021620712,0.0000041717803,0.000005504895,0.000025386835,0.00001238841],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99697787,0.00011418074,0.0020327587,0.00017691,0.00038035074,0.00031791272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981662,0.00040298668,0.0005364728,0.0003287732,0.0004577523,0.00010779612],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002269612,0.00023117173,0.0012669092,0.00057117763,0.000034746492,0.000009208248,0.00020490806,0.00012208095,0.0000049646146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006512333,0.00021073985,0.0002568107,0.0014246124,0.00009629155,0.00025728348,0.000033597968,0.00036293533,1.4461709e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000221582,0.00006415042,0.00434458,0.0013621699,0.000409698,0.000021222364,0.0010253965,0.9873779,0.0032202173,0.001836073,0.000012245352,0.00010475469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013067141,0.000117445124,0.064765595,0.0012209635,0.00024206079,0.000076014,0.0008209792,0.93059224,0.00048068175,0.000044999895,0.000078517,0.00025380345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009035615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000049998667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37309977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035271922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007470223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85937214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084602948","doi":"10.1108/13552511211265938","title":"A risk‐based approach to manage non‐repairable spare parts inventory","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Forecasting Techniques and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Spare part; Unavailability; Downtime; Reliability engineering; Criticality; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Operations research; Process (computing); Operations management; Engineering; Business","score_opus":0.1391941571290154,"score_gpt":0.38205060473579955,"score_spread":0.24285644760678415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084602948","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.301964,0.00007386546,0.6957861,0.0004515203,0.0002572523,0.00017335598,0.000006806795,0.00003684455,0.0012502004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89842623,0.000005664497,0.10108185,0.00017074395,0.00015383754,0.000020109284,4.826397e-7,0.000012547598,0.00012852039],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975936,0.00011108156,0.0010232442,0.00017331993,0.0007038341,0.00039496415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822253,0.0003995131,0.000511165,0.00043430168,0.00020282294,0.00022966805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010869108,0.00013145027,0.00035314518,0.00038617372,0.000049740003,0.00006616798,0.00060271745,0.000060404433,0.000014953002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037888607,0.000101015416,0.00016113026,0.0008326243,0.000024420162,0.00031543832,0.000077120574,0.0003695523,0.00001911126],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066779816,0.00054327375,0.071141265,0.000080233774,0.0000258205,0.00001066155,0.0035173215,0.8863395,0.0005224444,0.009511995,0.02303066,0.0052100536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013667574,0.00023798087,0.22415644,0.0008049928,0.000038928127,0.00007806902,0.0033684967,0.5432574,0.0014187694,0.008702215,0.21556339,0.0010065584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044083863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000633092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59646225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015078754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026387013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45358938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084709039","doi":"10.1108/13552511111180186","title":"Diagnosis of rotor bearings using logical analysis of data","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Advanced machining processes and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretability; Rotor (electric); Bearing (navigation); Property (philosophy); Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Fault (geology); Data mining; Computer science; Condition monitoring; Field (mathematics); Rolling-element bearing; Machine learning; Reliability engineering; Vibration; Pattern recognition (psychology); Mathematics","score_opus":0.11843594164467783,"score_gpt":0.3344910602180075,"score_spread":0.21605511857332968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084709039","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4890179,0.00036173934,0.51043165,0.0000049716095,0.00008978983,0.000037144226,0.000015795806,0.000012922867,0.000028094713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.883618,0.00033943032,0.11599691,0.0000044192298,0.000022267333,0.0000011841998,0.0000030114588,0.000013746807,0.0000010042697],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864316,0.000017449724,0.0008904034,0.00010058181,0.0001853268,0.00016307329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912274,0.00012353997,0.0003271212,0.0002475949,0.00013240008,0.00004662477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080280984,0.000112002395,0.00052924594,0.00039117737,0.0000076752995,0.000005081897,0.0003530433,0.000060604332,0.000021158801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043413645,0.00010195083,0.00010380615,0.000742826,0.000023819883,0.00040709818,0.00006183788,0.00020954394,8.2769084e-8],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018395145,0.000040170933,0.02430421,0.00021927853,0.0002180108,0.000005501827,0.00058648596,0.97229815,0.0010148031,0.00029047937,0.0000032148362,0.0010012756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031777675,0.00004225901,0.06889612,0.0003813046,0.00023953672,0.0000060332786,0.00020324382,0.92688113,0.0027001782,0.000105504114,0.00005950641,0.00016741364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005987497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001072351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39460012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059724105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001314735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4157434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086844373","doi":"10.1108/13552510510626990","title":"An application of the modulus maxima distribution in machinery condition monitoring","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Maxima; Fault (geology); Wavelet; Condition monitoring; Representation (politics); Vibration; EWMA chart; Wavelet transform; SIGNAL (programming language); Modulus; Engineering; Computer science; Algorithm; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Acoustics; Process (computing)","score_opus":0.008761650576450982,"score_gpt":0.3049666085273124,"score_spread":0.2962049579508614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086844373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8594286,0.00015184478,0.139828,0.00017076003,0.00020293846,0.00013011585,0.000014665196,0.000051076353,0.000022031594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960481,0.0000865614,0.003653478,0.000008814583,0.00015936772,0.0000193225,0.0000047069384,0.000018534933,0.0000011461495],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986456,0.000054035474,0.00079491246,0.00008692288,0.00022754379,0.00019099872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939895,0.0000683221,0.00019733705,0.00022403376,0.00007074256,0.00004064078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010849634,0.00012919818,0.00026208255,0.00014893548,0.000011846691,0.000012818542,0.00027172052,0.00007810091,0.000001849782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019780688,0.00011010369,0.0000769773,0.0003143266,0.000017111737,0.00038127502,0.000017584147,0.0004452095,4.4755492e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011143175,0.00008077191,0.050161682,0.00011460666,0.000008379305,0.0000022019703,0.00021680065,0.8780531,0.059893236,0.0011406135,0.000043600674,0.010273818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040142142,0.000025467114,0.51077974,0.00037762788,0.0000055361043,0.000016266655,0.000058599646,0.4402541,0.047238786,0.00033783732,0.00035532046,0.0001492843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005704131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000038806233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46061808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046507127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011152111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4489898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089216888","doi":"10.1108/13552510210439784","title":"Robot systems reliability and safety: a review","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Robot Manipulation and Learning","field":"Engineering","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Robot; Reliability engineering; Engineering; System safety; Computer science; Risk analysis (engineering); Artificial intelligence; Medicine","score_opus":0.06281210737052899,"score_gpt":0.3224919000956903,"score_spread":0.2596797927251613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089216888","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000002900461,0.98034495,0.01813233,0.000053373726,0.00087909214,0.00038118148,0.0000021896233,0.000068551446,0.00013543991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00013474388,0.99865186,0.0008105873,0.000019686453,0.00021087207,0.000014997543,0.0000033178146,0.00007375861,0.00008020168],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963536,0.00024711262,0.0025268756,0.00020108193,0.00031961175,0.00035168452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983975,0.00043692352,0.00060140423,0.00031775082,0.000103808445,0.00014256987],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003009348,0.00042715418,0.0026596868,0.00033341695,0.000021896058,0.000051091974,0.00026849293,0.00023411198,0.000023298182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010461971,0.0003579568,0.00037932477,0.00046520642,0.000020453212,0.00021453608,0.00003608182,0.0014525458,0.000010048525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020816522,0.000012993649,0.000006493781,0.18434723,0.00008712618,0.000049268754,0.00006913143,0.6425762,5.613263e-7,0.00023836183,0.00062922295,0.17198129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017537377,0.00001548388,0.000057183122,0.16265363,0.00012445965,0.0003256735,0.000014626909,0.030273689,2.3884892e-8,0.0000031512377,0.80599785,0.00035885206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006070927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.716007e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80536866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050730864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034594017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091627054","doi":"10.1108/13552510010311336","title":"A report on robot reliability and safety in Canada: a survey of robot users","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Occupational Health and Safety Research","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Robot; Reliability (semiconductor); Engineering; Histogram; Computer science; Simulation; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07936753025696573,"score_gpt":0.4246766002934366,"score_spread":0.3453090700364709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091627054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99664205,0.0000920867,0.00038709413,0.0020506084,0.00025045217,0.0003187722,0.000031281943,0.000003448521,0.00022418621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99861634,0.000296864,0.0007780426,0.00015773422,0.0000422081,0.000008797253,0.000004444459,0.000010411091,0.00008518812],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995928,0.00080364227,0.002114113,0.00016400454,0.00051802077,0.0004722303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956196,0.0031633028,0.0004244659,0.00023090735,0.00036355833,0.0001981482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01273158,0.00011340769,0.0005557232,0.00015895521,0.000054373882,0.0000020622244,0.00014136474,0.00009258754,0.00008459598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066818353,0.00009661178,0.000037902195,0.0004143685,0.000027335043,0.00010548704,0.000024262356,0.0011803769,0.0000012925848],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013614343,0.00004657857,0.8676231,0.00042507818,0.000006452857,0.000086620836,0.00027043995,0.127667,0.000018509725,0.00008808776,0.00010051292,0.0023062327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009789853,0.000069520036,0.99399626,0.00083159324,0.000001175095,0.000014453469,0.00017413347,0.0034492668,0.0000038710873,0.000040191957,0.00035914706,0.00008139325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7084337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7085317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1263732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016364147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030678222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79992634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094136778","doi":"10.1108/13552510010341207","title":"Joint determination of the optimum target mean and variance of a process","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Taguchi methods; Variance (accounting); Process (computing); Reduction (mathematics); Function (biology); Quality (philosophy); Statistics; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Value (mathematics); Joint (building); Computer science; Econometrics; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.06497288316638775,"score_gpt":0.38670939408879856,"score_spread":0.32173651092241085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094136778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59455717,0.0001605798,0.4046945,0.00024387542,0.00017919764,0.00007173651,0.000006640265,0.000003179817,0.00008315794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.953623,0.000024392602,0.04624897,0.000012583743,0.000037886875,0.0000013826022,3.7934196e-8,0.0000062507365,0.000045508525],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974917,0.000098431,0.0013130703,0.00013119775,0.00080572034,0.0001598382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99778223,0.00080450845,0.000714394,0.00018452221,0.000462221,0.000052107913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032803977,0.00009296784,0.00039614306,0.00012640205,0.00002256735,0.00001965857,0.0003797281,0.000043037824,0.000022452266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007719096,0.000059748898,0.00006592959,0.00048832415,0.00008656998,0.0003824824,0.00003299711,0.00027477802,3.8189737e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022786846,0.00015733796,0.01025711,0.0005241186,0.000022074248,0.000025624457,0.008409787,0.86518824,0.014047125,0.0047083194,0.000024958219,0.09640741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025759537,0.00035381838,0.30593368,0.003159053,0.000031890944,0.00018006771,0.004580589,0.43175402,0.03801171,0.21228047,0.00054443703,0.00059430307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004763997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002408312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43343422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004893737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047110152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9241036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105647959","doi":"10.1108/jqme-12-2012-0047","title":"Risk-based maintenance and remaining life assessment for gas turbines","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Nalcor Energy (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability engineering; Weibull distribution; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Preventive maintenance; Gas turbines; Risk assessment; Interval (graph theory); Risk management; Work (physics); Turbine; Operations research; Operations management; Computer science; Business; Statistics","score_opus":0.02507879782168979,"score_gpt":0.28493431160258476,"score_spread":0.25985551378089494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105647959","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25259522,0.00052390835,0.7446368,0.0008509219,0.00086335244,0.0002780662,0.000014571278,0.00008556097,0.00015161019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86339,0.0003683214,0.13582863,0.00011873934,0.00019832345,0.00002726603,0.0000034081188,0.000047855287,0.000017412118],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979272,0.00007436292,0.0010480622,0.00019000437,0.00029969716,0.0004606861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829495,0.0004477355,0.00033122132,0.00021820219,0.00043936644,0.00026854398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003908409,0.0002539398,0.0005767094,0.0002487517,0.000034607445,0.00006180764,0.00019952044,0.00012351866,0.000002330481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004048458,0.00022686212,0.00013277482,0.0002784089,0.00004994398,0.00038587075,0.000023521234,0.0005024068,5.9131867e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092812814,0.00003052182,0.003558453,0.00028139286,0.000034037825,0.000009184087,0.00035073594,0.99145335,0.0004221183,0.0015944428,0.00091913174,0.0012538201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029610235,0.00018923882,0.009899398,0.0006435407,0.000028106644,0.000027352866,0.00075125933,0.97998965,0.00022306707,0.001916334,0.0030046448,0.00036636024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017190516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015674457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61079484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039923642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014324301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92511684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133729278","doi":"10.1108/jqme-03-2014-0013","title":"Age replacement policies for two-component systems with stochastic dependence","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal; Université Laval; Cegep de Sainte Foy","funders":"","keywords":"Component (thermodynamics); Constant (computer programming); Reliability (semiconductor); Function (biology); Random variable; Stochastic modelling; Preventive maintenance; Domino effect; Probability density function; Computer science; Reliability engineering; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Engineering; Statistics","score_opus":0.02909560418926364,"score_gpt":0.2763367829980244,"score_spread":0.24724117880876076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133729278","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18912826,0.00034276058,0.8091624,0.00014457865,0.00075648417,0.00032860262,0.0000057474736,0.00005785204,0.00007336597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98666227,0.000029908968,0.013023496,0.000021422687,0.00015071493,0.00003794294,0.0000023930354,0.000033049993,0.000038817485],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983439,0.000034581524,0.000782058,0.00012725726,0.00034274906,0.00036946937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990013,0.00016781113,0.00018787662,0.00020431326,0.00029215828,0.00014651724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018729182,0.00018974901,0.00043316977,0.00018859831,0.000018387327,0.000056743607,0.0001987103,0.00005660437,8.3151804e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053104386,0.0001543895,0.00007055834,0.00020598448,0.000029332077,0.00028929434,0.000017018494,0.0002626733,9.837252e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016134039,0.000026395011,0.00008782479,0.00021616489,0.000033859855,0.0000149652,0.0008037526,0.99528044,0.0007978592,0.0023082693,0.00019472728,0.00007437265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028917454,0.00032638616,0.0006552618,0.0010699828,0.000023925677,0.00015829952,0.0018203445,0.99139947,0.00027660292,0.00027326492,0.0007522753,0.0003524649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006173253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027058075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.797534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055832823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056415945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6295821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141504626","doi":"10.1108/13552510510601320","title":"To maintain or not to maintain? What should a risk‐averse decision maker do?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"","keywords":"Risk aversion (psychology); Originality; Decision maker; Actuarial science; Computer science; Expected utility hypothesis; Economics; Monotone polygon; Component (thermodynamics); Value (mathematics); Operations research; Risk analysis (engineering); Econometrics; Engineering; Mathematics; Business; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.02399852375832842,"score_gpt":0.3048529495930108,"score_spread":0.28085442583468234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141504626","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39784554,0.00012384677,0.5979073,0.0025449016,0.0010157631,0.00040631834,0.000013262202,0.00010128058,0.000041804593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8203503,0.0012923328,0.17621557,0.0014667336,0.00045765753,0.00002744414,0.0000017548094,0.000094482435,0.00009375106],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963657,0.00010442423,0.0016421577,0.00034984923,0.00068171177,0.0008561252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790853,0.00054900424,0.00021945829,0.00052775495,0.00031769875,0.0004775578],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040564258,0.0004249042,0.0007573708,0.00070944225,0.000055162087,0.00023302175,0.00052389136,0.00021793382,0.00011175517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030720427,0.0003607588,0.00024466007,0.00096661405,0.00002784241,0.0012084695,0.00010496542,0.00090744015,0.00007680381],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065890764,0.00006131674,0.00016308318,0.000082547245,0.00003818048,0.0000718761,0.001486562,0.96191305,0.0011499663,0.0014558331,0.0014251627,0.031493492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0077347895,0.0012918132,0.034401063,0.008862826,0.00013247819,0.00057700224,0.015483163,0.7722441,0.0067519164,0.0028539635,0.14624853,0.0034183706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024210858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017661219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42250475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013546352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006788368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147702352","doi":"10.1108/13552510810861914","title":"Ant colonies for structure optimisation in a failure prone series‐parallel production system","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Series (stratigraphy); Production line; Mathematical optimization; Series and parallel circuits; Ant colony optimization algorithms; Production (economics); Ant colony; Computer science; Constraint (computer-aided design); Line (geometry); Homogeneous; Algorithm; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.017087117484387366,"score_gpt":0.2395639069053787,"score_spread":0.22247678942099133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147702352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8408696,0.00023361345,0.15714845,0.0004416524,0.00088549725,0.00031676827,0.000009303265,0.0000897517,0.0000053800695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.794773,0.00006297778,0.20486161,0.000005909545,0.0002406907,0.000018122164,0.000004841195,0.000016358339,0.00001651404],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987893,0.000026822048,0.0006747467,0.000108440836,0.00017538658,0.00022531603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995015,0.00005285067,0.00014661213,0.00008968013,0.00016376481,0.00004555209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057820877,0.0001447592,0.0003247146,0.0001950556,0.000028476503,0.000016951488,0.000101493606,0.0000988497,0.0000018374622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003233968,0.00012616832,0.00005593309,0.00028120968,0.000014057674,0.00033422865,0.0000068142094,0.00029483257,2.6095074e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005734327,0.000013441647,0.0005973136,0.00033020484,0.000017190427,0.000014711564,0.0011846257,0.993959,0.0033884228,0.00021707636,0.000057302215,0.00016336715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016749339,0.00011157566,0.012635621,0.00096128247,0.000011852054,0.0007241607,0.002462078,0.9763741,0.0042175814,0.000050747498,0.000386921,0.00038915887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006279987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035153556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047713157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003950896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003821702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5144995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298109637","doi":"10.1108/jqme-08-2014-0046","title":"An optimal production/maintenance strategy under lease contract with warranty periods","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"","keywords":"Lease; Warranty; Production (economics); Maintenance actions; Originality; Present value; Order (exchange); Optimal maintenance; Operations research; Reliability engineering; Operations management; Computer science; Business; Engineering; Economics; Finance; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.01393670944188923,"score_gpt":0.2540662062562128,"score_spread":0.24012949681432355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298109637","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.581626,0.00015951072,0.41667777,0.00072256563,0.00047171177,0.00016116517,0.000007528797,0.00009007123,0.00008365448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98806155,0.00046664057,0.011030063,0.000046975976,0.00024298145,0.0000140886195,0.0000015068898,0.00005509899,0.00008108732],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977108,0.00008286615,0.000975925,0.00027522907,0.00036765024,0.00058749807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985833,0.00012605246,0.0002416744,0.00039007663,0.0004532458,0.00020561177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015388132,0.00031967403,0.00054995285,0.00021998747,0.00004206615,0.00006670806,0.00030552095,0.00013244779,0.000046971832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043583626,0.00020798198,0.00011831245,0.00034192167,0.000114083006,0.0014623721,0.000012022239,0.00047357,0.000004678835],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027189625,0.00008684137,0.0006703334,0.00010746053,0.000048729715,0.000043949996,0.0003522692,0.9709452,0.021492586,0.0011757041,0.000103490405,0.004701558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0145406155,0.0025881508,0.1997817,0.007947987,0.00016184285,0.0020886182,0.0049510086,0.72720957,0.030135686,0.0017355595,0.0049413904,0.003917862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016583483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032931708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40643555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004713017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001061731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84812593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298760341","doi":"10.1108/jqme-12-2014-0060","title":"Joint reliability based design and periodic preventive maintenance policy for systems sold with warranty","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Warranty; Preventive maintenance; Reliability engineering; Reliability (semiconductor); Context (archaeology); Constraint (computer-aided design); Total cost; Engineering; Burn-in; Computer science; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.01676152537659786,"score_gpt":0.2384288729333553,"score_spread":0.22166734755675743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298760341","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09135727,0.00024666786,0.9063639,0.00093216705,0.00032156578,0.000663969,0.000020959835,0.000072585644,0.00002092042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.932141,0.00034415224,0.06714939,0.00003922274,0.00012934532,0.00008349432,9.4131354e-7,0.00005317466,0.00005927443],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976926,0.00012791739,0.0010667153,0.00026781647,0.00028017117,0.0005647966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981841,0.0005868726,0.00029848472,0.00030648985,0.00046458078,0.00015946385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031648271,0.00030710155,0.00068168226,0.00029613837,0.00004462226,0.000060265746,0.00019549875,0.00013580464,0.0000030800063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001503925,0.00019841317,0.0001384956,0.000309675,0.00011955013,0.0005327532,0.00001895489,0.0002766935,7.235248e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032069124,0.000046155616,0.000395135,0.000808313,0.0000421236,0.000010237465,0.00034944864,0.9873441,0.007332089,0.0017138508,0.00018785185,0.0014500115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0057871914,0.0006422645,0.009572876,0.0051024207,0.000044749424,0.00011967216,0.0004023604,0.97106016,0.0037728774,0.0011534031,0.0015723594,0.00076967495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002604022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000046757928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8407837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006881509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015800874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80910546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336477249","doi":"10.1108/jqme-04-2014-0015","title":"Optimizing production while reducing machinery lockout/tagout circumvention possibilities","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"","keywords":"Production (economics); Reliability engineering; Order (exchange); Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Condition-based maintenance; Operations research; Engineering; Operations management; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.015905457621621447,"score_gpt":0.24223969712400603,"score_spread":0.22633423950238457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336477249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6481327,0.00046436078,0.3481472,0.00069933146,0.0020399843,0.0001720096,0.0000049965975,0.00013704368,0.00020237474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98384124,0.00058213354,0.014931591,0.00001576038,0.0003588928,0.000010153972,0.0000015616118,0.00004493108,0.00021374966],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977963,0.00007441585,0.001180282,0.0002162655,0.00030913568,0.0004236127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989649,0.0001538891,0.00025437638,0.00029016985,0.00024461042,0.00009206526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021744324,0.00023028297,0.00043379635,0.00035062773,0.000035897803,0.000043525393,0.00020220662,0.000118039454,0.000023406787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001306632,0.00017664755,0.00017528435,0.00032761428,0.000047878315,0.0009873747,0.000025206586,0.00036522158,0.000004578587],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004131692,0.000035163124,0.00054584246,0.00022441836,0.000030645788,0.000009352537,0.0010140835,0.92005175,0.07045773,0.00056090526,0.00022490157,0.006803893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011582338,0.00087659527,0.074755065,0.029723143,0.00021729915,0.001249589,0.00807091,0.70959353,0.14006005,0.011726108,0.0070365025,0.005108859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000166477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008997416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33570856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006661939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004170435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7203478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2496838318","doi":"10.1108/jqme-05-2012-0018","title":"Availability analysis of a LNG processing plant using the Markov process","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability engineering; Process (computing); Markov chain; Markov process; Interval (graph theory); Reliability (semiconductor); Markov model; State (computer science); Computer science; Engineering; Process state; Algorithm; Mathematics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.018115085283415083,"score_gpt":0.2709274053394155,"score_spread":0.2528123200560004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2496838318","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69832045,0.00025163736,0.3008523,0.00018995965,0.00017863532,0.000112564376,0.000015844897,0.00002864594,0.000049945367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949416,0.00015396818,0.0048057837,0.000015508393,0.000050393453,0.0000044990916,8.1911423e-7,0.000020054073,0.0000074032846],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787503,0.000072880386,0.0012364888,0.00014399177,0.00034671088,0.0003248999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864614,0.00030782644,0.00038804128,0.00026175156,0.00033391512,0.000062335006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026487298,0.0001813554,0.00059955346,0.00038630416,0.000028498083,0.000023304543,0.0003085023,0.00008802028,0.000015823982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009888862,0.000105377694,0.00021608041,0.0011913979,0.00008104286,0.0004384101,0.000022500019,0.00026586122,2.6912556e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005325924,0.000034150737,0.006936889,0.00036376237,0.00017636617,0.0000049018504,0.00083186,0.9780835,0.0111070555,0.0002520084,0.000012937267,0.0021432952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006876077,0.000038477472,0.037358005,0.0013115448,0.00024845346,0.000029475093,0.0008245582,0.95529336,0.0034583372,0.00028414643,0.00016278848,0.0003032786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015447098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028214004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29662108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030965963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006781889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42971778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589443969","doi":"10.1108/jqme-07-2015-0030","title":"Optimal CBM policy with two sampling intervals","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability engineering; Weibull distribution; Condition-based maintenance; Reliability (semiconductor); Residual; Interval (graph theory); Sampling (signal processing); Importance sampling; Statistics; Hazard; Preventive maintenance; Sensitivity (control systems); Computer science; Engineering; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Monte Carlo method; Algorithm","score_opus":0.026692761526110474,"score_gpt":0.3153177090883588,"score_spread":0.2886249475622483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589443969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5493807,0.00011854921,0.44851267,0.00069579313,0.00048515937,0.00011320868,0.000004339938,0.00006263074,0.00062695093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94710505,0.00022217889,0.052221444,0.000038631202,0.0003178673,0.0000054249876,8.284504e-7,0.000041465308,0.000047132726],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983515,0.000027494618,0.0007863517,0.0001424112,0.00026170228,0.0004305534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988019,0.00010639191,0.0003300329,0.0004411228,0.00020173423,0.00011882472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014137793,0.00022145499,0.00048172148,0.00026559847,0.00007169236,0.00015948468,0.0005047699,0.000077100645,0.000008100581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001234447,0.00018471024,0.00012287236,0.00015135044,0.00007008441,0.00079454895,0.00005019123,0.00053603644,0.000003410973],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054742777,0.000021240248,0.0010960053,0.00013533306,0.00003987525,0.000027534401,0.00039048726,0.9917171,0.0018025049,0.0034310268,0.00004130287,0.0012428561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007336508,0.00046435924,0.11548794,0.005394612,0.00006330746,0.00057621073,0.0010413636,0.8528687,0.0052885986,0.0015678068,0.008285605,0.0016249929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000059794318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002911787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39772433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034539436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006154597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7532265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750424462","doi":"10.1108/jqme-06-2016-0028","title":"Bearing temperature monitoring of a Wind Turbine using physics-based model","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"","keywords":"SCADA; Bearing (navigation); Turbine; Control chart; ALARM; Wind power; Engineering; Wind speed; Computer science; Reliability engineering; Control engineering; Marine engineering; Mechanical engineering; Meteorology; Artificial intelligence; Aerospace engineering","score_opus":0.18448093095330395,"score_gpt":0.45511740380563165,"score_spread":0.2706364728523277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2750424462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5897725,0.00009108146,0.40944877,0.00009338952,0.000512506,0.00004664565,0.0000065162053,0.0000063448438,0.0000222205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8789842,0.0000071289905,0.120603345,0.000007803678,0.00035136158,7.043052e-7,9.814301e-8,0.000020791838,0.0000245757],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99647474,0.000060491286,0.0015306267,0.00026016266,0.001294589,0.00037939567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959931,0.0008923865,0.0015364571,0.0006211622,0.00081989454,0.00013699997],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037557413,0.00020957719,0.00073409226,0.0002481208,0.00014337084,0.00020693043,0.0010978155,0.00009638477,0.0000023636928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014984913,0.00017128192,0.00017684125,0.00028847327,0.00010017397,0.0010951268,0.00013153665,0.00073097495,7.4030925e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005553217,0.0000333511,0.023024417,0.000063409105,0.000011315402,0.000029298226,0.00025153733,0.895592,0.078669675,0.00066335837,0.0000023336486,0.0016038225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001288196,0.000058189296,0.07789171,0.001711953,0.0000173516,0.000015282609,0.0005183572,0.8728505,0.02959034,0.015701452,0.000016163012,0.0003405476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020434389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020989373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28921166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002205398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014566591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763991617","doi":"10.1108/jqme-06-2016-0023","title":"Maintenance strategies: Decision Making Grid vs Jack-Knife Diagram","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Downtime; Pareto analysis; Reliability engineering; Ranking (information retrieval); Predictive maintenance; Computer science; Preventive maintenance; Operations research; Scope (computer science); Pareto principle; Engineering; Operations management; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.012230045370374027,"score_gpt":0.2785204771279729,"score_spread":0.26629043175759887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763991617","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24311785,0.00028317553,0.7515908,0.00026327302,0.00337322,0.00020371309,0.000007855933,0.00015417169,0.0010059731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9611223,0.00057670363,0.037311327,0.00013125823,0.00075437763,0.000010307621,0.0000018227792,0.00006456564,0.000027341845],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99683756,0.00007041546,0.001573436,0.0002690701,0.00050176255,0.0007477411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981964,0.00039670643,0.00032960207,0.00042066752,0.00050904095,0.00014756805],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024259437,0.0003653229,0.0006900679,0.000391217,0.000060206257,0.00014300739,0.00051705504,0.00020532646,0.000055811073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014956385,0.00032753372,0.00021152926,0.00068616477,0.00012224642,0.0010313746,0.000058099944,0.0007601944,0.000024001729],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021031927,0.00006144468,0.00048480483,0.00027693112,0.000049152306,0.00006939726,0.0013337457,0.9807679,0.0017257449,0.0037245005,0.002844024,0.0084520485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003387237,0.00067640294,0.03125906,0.006502222,0.000046621415,0.00038966193,0.0027049724,0.92585,0.0013477935,0.009696919,0.01658759,0.0015515287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014721459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005849901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71800447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000660764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010273872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785066942","doi":"10.1108/jqme-01-2016-0003","title":"Gear fault detection using dynamic transmission variance","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University; Queen's University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Position (finance); Transmission (telecommunications); Fault (geology); SIGNAL (programming language); Engineering; Drive shaft; Angular displacement; Rotational speed; Non-circular gear; Structural engineering; Worm drive; Gear train; Spiral bevel gear; Control theory (sociology); Acoustics; Mechanical engineering; Computer science; Electrical engineering; Artificial intelligence; Physics; Geology","score_opus":0.01284275738971346,"score_gpt":0.2631509402926099,"score_spread":0.2503081829028964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785066942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50679296,0.000102865226,0.49268708,0.000023916837,0.00030980015,0.000023544431,8.803265e-7,0.0000277734,0.00003120605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98534846,0.00009694414,0.014357926,0.000011148471,0.00013679793,6.493847e-7,3.5901402e-7,0.00002817557,0.000019553057],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987668,0.000028416649,0.0006015755,0.00010464266,0.00021987227,0.00027869444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950266,0.000041904652,0.00010724709,0.00013881766,0.00013216541,0.00007720251],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085351424,0.00014559635,0.00030257792,0.00029120923,0.00003318783,0.00003232369,0.00016248385,0.00009175548,0.00001246468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000091807444,0.00013810831,0.00013490788,0.0004277041,0.000022792294,0.00020457576,0.000011753943,0.00038872828,0.0000038026092],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016327906,0.000014733614,0.00017716181,0.00008587103,0.000044721073,0.000014172316,0.00031530362,0.7872748,0.20647931,0.000053475553,0.00000295927,0.005521207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031019046,0.000039760987,0.007950958,0.00024579174,0.000020532278,0.00005710325,0.00007440228,0.98812926,0.0024086193,0.00013725793,0.00045659707,0.00016951455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003457125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033032728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4785555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029005183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017089142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5631894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793821770","doi":"10.1108/jqme-11-2016-0069","title":"Maintenance and setup planning in manufacturing systems under uncertainties","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"","keywords":"Robustness (evolution); Production (economics); Computer science; Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equation; Mathematical optimization; Paper machine; Optimal control; Industrial engineering; Reliability engineering; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.022166998238164867,"score_gpt":0.27065885335014706,"score_spread":0.24849185511198219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793821770","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.801426,0.0011988071,0.19566736,0.00014289237,0.001244334,0.000082881445,0.0000026159782,0.000070697475,0.00016440907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857404,0.00016814443,0.013722814,0.000042848653,0.00024922992,0.0000038128676,6.529777e-7,0.000031813095,0.000040246043],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984496,0.000040090625,0.000784787,0.00013317021,0.00020932488,0.000383012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999404,0.00015717,0.00013392912,0.00012933969,0.00008820791,0.00008732262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012139569,0.00019110166,0.00039778612,0.00038389527,0.000025907751,0.00006996067,0.00016077801,0.00009887302,0.0000047268118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019210503,0.00017817509,0.00004521714,0.00022772451,0.00004888157,0.00028204086,0.000025373378,0.00046728598,0.0000018827213],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018393925,0.000007848747,0.0015726114,0.00014302589,0.000020986194,0.000036767804,0.001109902,0.99581456,0.0002919637,0.000577028,0.000054134412,0.00035277283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012048554,0.000057250123,0.03058746,0.0019621344,0.0000072108523,0.00016837852,0.004279361,0.9596673,0.0009438465,0.00024112906,0.00049288815,0.00038816727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000036110083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012807049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18431443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024624637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019921668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7265769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886613520","doi":"10.1108/jqme-04-2016-0017","title":"Remaining useful life estimation of metropolitan train wheels considering measurement error","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Railway Engineering and Dynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metropolitan area; Engineering; Prognostics; Estimation; Reliability engineering; Profiling (computer programming); Computer science","score_opus":0.048002414383236415,"score_gpt":0.28431863625900083,"score_spread":0.23631622187576443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886613520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51400864,0.00039468583,0.4843088,0.000092587805,0.0007902048,0.000082803745,0.000008029675,0.00009159987,0.00022262249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95782787,0.000040215138,0.041860506,0.000021778236,0.0001865718,0.0000035314572,9.895008e-7,0.000054080858,0.0000044556778],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973259,0.000053484277,0.001440107,0.00014088793,0.0005870014,0.00045264701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875575,0.00018350226,0.00027954334,0.00025954278,0.00034407387,0.0001775823],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031789748,0.0002634199,0.00065418886,0.00051073416,0.000026032547,0.00002866918,0.00024388384,0.00011680207,0.000010495547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024633575,0.00026655084,0.00016157192,0.00043942416,0.00006492121,0.00031834026,0.000023166522,0.00045993182,0.0000022601564],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023501247,0.000022904283,0.000399115,0.00036200343,0.0000971605,0.000012965423,0.001138581,0.9830813,0.011947125,0.0020805395,0.0000981845,0.0007366368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009555562,0.00015319508,0.010891035,0.0013479682,0.000029741952,0.00006199043,0.0011257193,0.9793335,0.005047444,0.00040364044,0.00026074206,0.00038942887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002244549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027474698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44381922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076842896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000082358885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909183615","doi":"10.1108/jqme-04-2017-0027","title":"A decision support tool for bi-objective risk-based maintenance scheduling of an LNG gas sweetening unit","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Scheduling (production processes); Engineering; Multi-objective optimization; Pareto principle; Reliability engineering; Schedule; Shutdown; Operations research; Computer science; Operations management","score_opus":0.012253743581122224,"score_gpt":0.26686274072369576,"score_spread":0.2546089971425735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909183615","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5483859,0.000058252335,0.45054746,0.000033811964,0.0005678795,0.00030226057,0.000019208403,0.00004456569,0.000040626623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81146854,0.00012263413,0.18819104,0.0000294621,0.00008873932,0.000016961634,0.0000068504055,0.00006109555,0.000014698016],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969581,0.000088679495,0.001651836,0.00028207403,0.00042500198,0.00059434166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99727505,0.0008741741,0.00063259416,0.000419235,0.0006727299,0.00012619396],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040728734,0.00032538542,0.00083742867,0.00049931544,0.000038784652,0.000044419285,0.00039651472,0.00019731215,0.000020733283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002620371,0.0003044392,0.00031026555,0.0005675013,0.000044472632,0.00077721674,0.000030076628,0.00067514967,0.0000031647937],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003766976,0.00006420398,0.004256915,0.0004820333,0.000047396512,0.000008719333,0.0004228597,0.98045516,0.008714498,0.00092687976,0.000019379811,0.0042252857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030828484,0.00045981663,0.013077014,0.0016443105,0.0000343566,0.0000269459,0.00061947404,0.9727431,0.006518398,0.0009339245,0.00041895118,0.00044084145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026551534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023646237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2630826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003653857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013256742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914242382","doi":"10.1108/jqme-07-2017-0051","title":"Comparative study on logical analysis of data (LAD), artificial neural networks (ANN), and proportional hazards model (PHM) for maintenance prognostics","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Prognostics; Turbofan; Artificial neural network; Engineering; Residual; Reliability engineering; Data set; Set (abstract data type); Condition-based maintenance; Statistical model; Data mining; Computer science; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Algorithm","score_opus":0.0855465146043742,"score_gpt":0.38522053826582175,"score_spread":0.2996740236614476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914242382","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6939197,0.00008411428,0.30509955,0.0000795581,0.00012814233,0.00054509076,0.00008919311,0.00004151591,0.000013148142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988087,0.000027187474,0.011691974,0.000031718988,0.00007969018,0.000030705924,0.00002285024,0.0000250385,0.0000038083915],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975848,0.00006537902,0.0013120283,0.000280205,0.00041008584,0.0003474705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983293,0.0005648633,0.00036624522,0.00039923866,0.0002571113,0.000083242674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00206636,0.00026409986,0.0010422006,0.00042075588,0.00001997921,0.000035890895,0.0004509066,0.00010134467,0.0000038016292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051132694,0.00022113406,0.00015216695,0.0005119573,0.000044830642,0.0003083503,0.00009373893,0.00055759546,2.1653194e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015715478,0.0002847479,0.018153476,0.0000985083,0.00038532456,0.000009293972,0.00037744586,0.9782674,0.00051420636,0.0011003957,0.00018805797,0.00046403625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051003054,0.00033165017,0.066060275,0.00014717765,0.00016015886,0.000005256529,0.00025168151,0.93197846,0.00014662098,0.00016855414,0.000021925474,0.0002182064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000075297253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003961234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2941673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012018584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029707317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90175855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943418631","doi":"10.1108/jqme-05-2018-0041","title":"Non-linear threshold algorithm based solution for the redundancy allocation problem considering multiple redundancy strategies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Redundancy (engineering); Mathematical optimization; Simulated annealing; Computer science; Triple modular redundancy; Particle swarm optimization; Computational complexity theory; Algorithm; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01871479499429573,"score_gpt":0.26048179076073097,"score_spread":0.24176699576643523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943418631","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049971428,0.00039361062,0.947005,0.00065259245,0.0010584027,0.0007370779,0.000008306338,0.000078352656,0.00009523055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85443145,0.00020510657,0.14501312,0.00004308549,0.00017141203,0.00005316602,0.0000070412493,0.000047106714,0.000028500159],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808174,0.00002474502,0.0010054846,0.00018423348,0.0002735075,0.0004302708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861217,0.00043929875,0.0002602202,0.00029531604,0.00033034506,0.00006264604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018748022,0.00023642911,0.00040929028,0.00017215895,0.000059736296,0.000081304956,0.00026012558,0.00013223603,0.000007216414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031207904,0.00019224804,0.00017936579,0.00029453525,0.000042244683,0.00066769874,0.000019653831,0.00047356886,0.0000030702533],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045083892,0.000035983223,0.00031002623,0.00045874115,0.000036485,0.0000020255284,0.00040092817,0.98656195,0.009011503,0.00082383445,0.00014178951,0.002171669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001540541,0.00008349323,0.0015591693,0.00066518335,0.000016904733,0.000013360383,0.0006117851,0.99202704,0.0016834289,0.0005467697,0.0010130784,0.00023923887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025707228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024613662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80446005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003215819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012356888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78396475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2956059284","doi":"10.1108/jqme-01-2018-0004","title":"Intersection of corrosion prevention strategy and practice","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Armed Forces; Royal Military College of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Engineering; Preventive maintenance; Corrosion prevention; Corrosion; Order (exchange); Risk analysis (engineering); Transport engineering; Intersection (aeronautics); Operations research; Operations management; Computer science; Business; Reliability engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.014525414493720459,"score_gpt":0.2766741700682861,"score_spread":0.26214875557456563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2956059284","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8007485,0.00026422148,0.19723508,0.00008241672,0.0005669234,0.00013925873,0.0000011761656,0.000021969881,0.0009404471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939478,0.00042386405,0.005526243,0.000009354608,0.000030326335,0.0000015013075,8.216666e-7,0.000012653543,0.000047420428],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989511,0.00005638456,0.00063146476,0.000077133234,0.00015122714,0.00013269331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999272,0.00020460803,0.00022041074,0.00009980169,0.00016851576,0.00003465465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014780887,0.00009477891,0.00025633155,0.00015448683,0.0000059073623,0.00001417519,0.000068472866,0.00007143977,0.000008766424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063776266,0.00008898631,0.000056932644,0.00017689285,0.000015667692,0.0006036734,0.000012826312,0.00025179097,0.0000011178086],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010465849,0.000034641485,0.00061904395,0.0003556172,0.00001319822,0.0000024248939,0.00046088325,0.9499737,0.043888923,0.002407822,0.00003700382,0.0021020877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034111175,0.0010311579,0.045075834,0.0034231767,0.00005740365,0.00040114758,0.0068131383,0.9260177,0.009074813,0.0021215966,0.0019885288,0.0005843842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010336518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000047235008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1931993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013824557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018794935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36287564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2985992878","doi":"10.1108/jqme-10-2018-0087","title":"Fault detection for parallel operating machines","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Redundancy (engineering); Fault detection and isolation; Residual; Computer science; Autoregressive model; Fault (geology); Condition monitoring; Vibration; Bearing (navigation); Reliability engineering; Real-time computing; Control engineering; Engineering; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.012626316008251313,"score_gpt":0.2997699237758784,"score_spread":0.2871436077676271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2985992878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69332373,0.0002525788,0.30506298,0.00011752847,0.0006742165,0.0002862068,0.000005130962,0.00014259112,0.00013501683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96165353,0.00008714153,0.037928414,0.00004860491,0.00017562145,0.000033702767,0.000001256528,0.000044721204,0.000027028724],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985739,0.000027683205,0.0008009924,0.000114703835,0.00018493438,0.0002977866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992469,0.0002771499,0.00013848081,0.00016250476,0.00011646911,0.000058505528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012513354,0.00018828077,0.00041481,0.00024042267,0.000016572729,0.000038986207,0.0002188571,0.00009472078,0.000011443542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055614987,0.00017301743,0.00014899798,0.00018100372,0.0000070471924,0.00032045343,0.0000184507,0.00042291006,0.0000033461968],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022503122,0.000026238838,0.0039031482,0.00045274405,0.00003676037,0.000005751693,0.0002666277,0.9121365,0.075199544,0.00068483513,0.00024172632,0.007023647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013356615,0.00016347233,0.015728509,0.0005864169,0.000011018097,0.00005785282,0.00011676214,0.9607819,0.016714659,0.0004225693,0.0036655338,0.00041569222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019389445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023423321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26832977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020062104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011813914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7055446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3083181974","doi":"10.1108/jqme-03-2020-0017","title":"Wind power system reliability and maintenance optimization considering turbine and wind uncertainty","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Power System Reliability and Maintenance","field":"Engineering","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Turbine; Wind power; Reliability (semiconductor); Reliability engineering; Wind speed; Engineering; Renewable energy; Electric power system; Marine engineering; Power (physics); Meteorology; Mechanical engineering; Electrical engineering","score_opus":0.01262036075807065,"score_gpt":0.22242886753198332,"score_spread":0.20980850677391266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3083181974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.846999,0.0019350909,0.14697644,0.0019460863,0.00117333,0.00043201575,0.000027125436,0.00022014962,0.0002907486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99183357,0.00031385355,0.007501008,0.00014838451,0.00014474332,0.0000034027873,0.0000011214775,0.000046174948,0.000007773501],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972751,0.00011255887,0.0014133338,0.0003471519,0.0003273109,0.0005245487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853116,0.00033774067,0.00028741657,0.00026558104,0.00024364566,0.00033444088],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019944042,0.00036312122,0.00088409905,0.00014987506,0.000045502744,0.000078436045,0.00022266463,0.00017364023,0.0000070454303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015950262,0.00033040656,0.00011192322,0.0003614282,0.00011461137,0.0005248306,0.00008275732,0.00070747035,0.0000014702847],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000895738,0.000014866738,0.0015094149,0.0014647538,0.000042615648,0.00005675297,0.0015988022,0.99232894,0.0014825388,0.0010568054,0.00019144053,0.00016348375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026027642,0.00021347743,0.010884115,0.0025565764,0.000037150847,0.0005097382,0.003398779,0.97426564,0.00027886863,0.00010770602,0.004388464,0.0007567343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024849516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005494194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14483453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003786452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048067963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169825082","doi":"10.1108/jqme-06-2020-0050","title":"Appropriate strategy selection for reliability-centered maintenance of one-shot systems using fuzzy model","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Data mining; Expert system; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; One shot; Reliability engineering; Engineering","score_opus":0.07032335816318719,"score_gpt":0.2972927037030867,"score_spread":0.2269693455398995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169825082","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35112935,0.00035024597,0.64742225,0.00006572254,0.0005964815,0.00028007085,0.000025270723,0.000043781198,0.00008683717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9351186,0.00040944462,0.06420733,0.000014007892,0.00012531922,0.000017672566,0.0000064742403,0.00005497517,0.00004613339],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699956,0.00009296089,0.0017790316,0.00026229915,0.00034639993,0.0005197598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978363,0.00018373056,0.0004603566,0.00029805306,0.001113614,0.00010795893],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002143944,0.0002729833,0.00083355804,0.0002310368,0.000034551274,0.0000526448,0.00022531544,0.00020042971,0.0000029431508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011152799,0.00027725205,0.00026028085,0.0005417855,0.000043730684,0.00052424596,0.000028224602,0.00048683057,3.106324e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110921355,0.00010556711,0.00027003323,0.0015429066,0.00006092298,0.0000039672027,0.00025378147,0.9320074,0.061685577,0.0036882376,0.000042214506,0.0002285196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012378114,0.00007673195,0.00040038224,0.0011739428,0.000034709235,0.000056316934,0.0004922447,0.98929447,0.005261656,0.0016147686,0.00007631237,0.00028064498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003437987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001915682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58398926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065261184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018458036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206390449","doi":"10.1108/jqme-10-2020-0109","title":"Models for maintenance planning and scheduling – a citation-based literature review and content analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Co-citation; Thematic analysis; Computer science; Exploratory analysis; Data science; Scheduling (production processes); Citation analysis; Operations research; Management science; Engineering; Operations management; Sociology; Social science; Qualitative research; Library science","score_opus":0.0379132787457484,"score_gpt":0.2849896022973017,"score_spread":0.2470763235515533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206390449","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045862846,0.060986117,0.8915734,0.0011492661,0.00014738836,0.00020742741,0.000020759404,0.000032481308,0.000020310466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8279816,0.022342319,0.14889283,0.0005936594,0.00006285522,0.000035879668,0.000021429983,0.000037315014,0.000032140953],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984619,0.000047962036,0.0008493764,0.00019480717,0.0001624584,0.00028347014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986216,0.00035150762,0.0001884877,0.00015856959,0.00057831267,0.00010156307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014500519,0.00019452382,0.00068210583,0.00028423293,0.000031691423,0.0000764397,0.000087872235,0.00009382698,0.0000017959563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013687098,0.00017884988,0.00016816295,0.00079342193,0.000027285965,0.00040841382,0.000015857284,0.00033589735,5.947315e-8],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021819576,0.000014196735,0.0005090552,0.0030285455,0.00014857798,0.000026565802,0.00039949437,0.9928714,0.0007932715,0.0017070947,0.00005037802,0.00042961116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000871675,0.000029723371,0.0025465372,0.006711257,0.0002304574,0.00004599958,0.00035968015,0.9880188,0.00019701678,0.0005932602,0.00015628124,0.00023932889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000021494097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005153854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78211874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000118951895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003993224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72932863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292261361","doi":"10.1108/jqme-01-2022-0004","title":"Condition-based monitoring of the rail wheel using logical analysis of data and ant colony optimization","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Railway Engineering and Dynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ant colony optimization algorithms; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Artificial neural network; Data mining; Computer science","score_opus":0.03885443131445104,"score_gpt":0.29514765277373217,"score_spread":0.25629322145928113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292261361","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6629351,0.00027242475,0.3363196,0.000031811902,0.00028040493,0.00004647086,0.000097473654,0.000012732315,0.000004005878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97877944,0.00004889427,0.021107387,0.000005818365,0.00003076885,0.0000017922416,0.000008692271,0.00001549886,0.0000017248682],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862665,0.000058589067,0.00074127794,0.00010135283,0.00031307715,0.00015904395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909,0.00024144707,0.000258924,0.00028821742,0.000081667466,0.000039749153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011963156,0.00011633343,0.00043147156,0.00036044273,0.000033435063,0.000010887383,0.000352425,0.000042492204,0.000007729718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002706154,0.0001016842,0.00010309866,0.00089580636,0.000032593704,0.00014861453,0.00009103522,0.00034510554,1.1929621e-8],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013855632,0.000024194163,0.014465426,0.00011257956,0.00015616343,0.0000044043813,0.00016839948,0.97990775,0.0049819616,0.000087923865,0.0000050639082,0.00007226934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033287512,0.000023481434,0.031931486,0.00011526097,0.000121556885,0.000009412187,0.00027411585,0.9667994,0.0002559417,0.000007995114,0.000029488241,0.00009902004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001938084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000021769242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31584433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018344852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003793306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41465613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293087192","doi":"10.1108/jqme-04-2021-0026","title":"Preventive maintenance and silica exposure limits integrated in the production planning of a granite processing unit","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"","keywords":"Production (economics); Preventive maintenance; Production planning; Originality; Context (archaeology); Stochastic programming; Function (biology); Reliability engineering; Engineering; Operations research; Computer science; Operations management; Risk analysis (engineering); Mathematical optimization; Business; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.02346134568840674,"score_gpt":0.2671968218012263,"score_spread":0.24373547611281954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293087192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84334266,0.0014349794,0.1544632,0.00018491202,0.00028218023,0.0002033923,0.0000076259153,0.0000342717,0.00004673896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955339,0.0001361244,0.0042275945,0.0000155532,0.000036931553,0.000015888572,0.000002308291,0.000017729266,0.000013965034],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987679,0.00010159958,0.00060217234,0.00010800762,0.00021803679,0.00020227492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993945,0.0001581478,0.00022793585,0.000104690385,0.00009115195,0.000023613165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001452245,0.00013080696,0.00025993626,0.0002534889,0.000043815173,0.00001624982,0.00016986873,0.000033680415,0.0000015595857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006770819,0.000107129046,0.000036288387,0.00047328824,0.000030492787,0.00020252758,0.000022139504,0.0006857943,4.006989e-8],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005363247,0.00003272508,0.000895347,0.00019691113,0.00001015824,0.000020879519,0.004095401,0.9906164,0.0019691866,0.00021494424,0.000019804815,0.0018746296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032924837,0.0007625025,0.1637062,0.004425662,0.00008072159,0.0008022946,0.045545876,0.769028,0.0052444036,0.0030951295,0.0028533672,0.0011633668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007843219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000066875496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22158839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012691325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023645596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43685958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7105981217","doi":"10.1108/jqme-04-2025-0025","title":"A semi-Markov model for reliability and cost analysis of two-unit cold standby systems considering operator fatigue, preventive maintenance and imperfect repairs","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering","topic":"Reliability and Maintenance Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Downtime; Preventive maintenance; Reliability (semiconductor); Imperfect; Operator (biology); Maintenance engineering; Corrective maintenance; Quality (philosophy)","score_opus":0.017292805404390987,"score_gpt":0.2898611953423296,"score_spread":0.27256838993793864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7105981217","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4133234,0.000929358,0.58470786,0.000078658166,0.00021146459,0.0005878825,0.0000746391,0.00003606316,0.000050708408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98048073,0.0010566431,0.018243184,0.000024943738,0.000018505141,0.00006746123,0.000003942754,0.000025992966,0.000078601326],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748486,0.00010833126,0.0014986088,0.00029703724,0.00021416393,0.00039697532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978389,0.00083229545,0.00032648034,0.00031642627,0.00057282374,0.00011306578],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034639507,0.00028385356,0.0011155041,0.0005598221,0.000048990212,0.00006187947,0.00016467599,0.00013700317,0.000001426709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020160985,0.0002646051,0.00021200211,0.0008436475,0.00010987498,0.0003943418,0.000055324323,0.00037311064,2.734923e-8],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012011733,0.000034733035,0.005418713,0.0013831707,0.00043829138,0.0000034259015,0.00063025445,0.9839979,0.0036640838,0.004007402,0.00010019142,0.00020173084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001528608,0.000054661443,0.0027815467,0.0013274725,0.00026921017,0.0000067626315,0.00067821407,0.99214196,0.00061682373,0.00022965968,0.00012012935,0.00024494974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000061408085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007821198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5671573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034998928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009562053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}