{"meta":{"query_hash":"c77e2a389396","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics"},"cohort_total":14,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"exported":14,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c77e2a389396","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Religious+Ethics"},"results":[{"id":"W1524391143","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9795.2011.00497.x","title":"THE LASH IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD<sup>1</sup>: Torture and Citizenry in Medieval Muslim Jurisprudence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Torture; SWORD; Jurisprudence; Law; Compromise; Citizenship; Human rights; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Religious studies; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.040376156682424454,"score_gpt":0.30601790729226813,"score_spread":0.2656417506098437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1524391143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58124775,0.0059081074,0.004371658,0.13872883,0.0010475741,0.000030544623,0.000027030499,0.000030660227,0.2686078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99538475,0.00018782646,0.00012531609,0.0021852243,0.0001001895,0.0000031066618,0.0000011095393,0.0000051722645,0.0020073524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959585,0.0031723382,0.00010912539,0.0002442313,0.00025717268,0.0002585969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955273,0.0032016647,0.0003162168,0.00026397832,0.00041941245,0.00027132552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007649377,0.0001592532,0.0003095371,0.0007586643,0.012055993,0.006036345,0.00050526415,0.003610976,0.0015899658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004454102,0.00025038386,0.00015063405,0.0004379483,0.060594477,0.003984135,0.0033912093,0.0063481485,0.00015009078],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022956947,0.000021666325,0.0010604495,0.000023383334,0.0000046739156,0.00023396642,0.1945643,0.00007322567,0.0003052545,0.7996152,0.0018763772,0.0021986396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003681986,0.00015854953,0.0077078044,0.0004711976,0.000021009999,0.00094519753,0.32605222,0.0013344896,0.0011627217,0.49598318,0.16603272,0.00009410741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009075037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01462511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012055993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032286597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015682284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04045427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1538249942","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9795.2006.00285.x","title":"“NOT ETHICS, NOT ETHICS ALONE, BUT THE HOLY”","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctification; Conflation; Appeal; Epistemology; Philosophy; Key (lock); Sociology; Theology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.11044254504997121,"score_gpt":0.31552000309056993,"score_spread":0.20507745804059874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1538249942","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03264445,0.040301286,0.06745944,0.40873447,0.003447721,0.000046733774,0.00012126549,0.00015977121,0.44708493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91998607,0.007931811,0.007156656,0.023292474,0.0020206403,0.000078224046,0.000060269052,0.00009388076,0.039379917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99503505,0.003627665,0.00010230045,0.00033458837,0.000700857,0.00019951064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99587005,0.002085779,0.00041859166,0.0005344668,0.0008290416,0.00026212513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036987402,0.00038973984,0.0003270379,0.00081324915,0.002455712,0.005728652,0.00063948723,0.0022143787,0.003510776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005661978,0.00018230663,0.00024265931,0.0008154569,0.031049628,0.0075134467,0.002494711,0.005063372,0.0007145757],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007642759,0.0000059621284,0.00016694378,0.000045277247,0.0000050276776,0.000029528854,0.002462286,0.000078581936,0.000114669325,0.98216677,0.010914149,0.004003099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006200904,0.000015369942,0.00039239993,0.00027785465,0.0000063600132,0.00013604574,0.003558874,0.00027937567,0.00024114417,0.795452,0.19962505,0.000009225383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018698304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015375495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005728652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032600097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025209829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02365321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1838025725","doi":"10.1111/jore.12069","title":"<scp>S</scp>tout, <scp>R</scp>awls, and the Idea of Public Reason","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Public reason; Liberalism; Perception; Philosophy; Backlash; Epistemology; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Democracy; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.040209093995394365,"score_gpt":0.3366561900054626,"score_spread":0.29644709601006825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1838025725","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036296856,0.0074589527,0.007696892,0.49476027,0.0018515046,0.000024654011,0.00003988737,0.000046645913,0.45182437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9326314,0.0021928805,0.0015020187,0.023409396,0.00083356944,0.000031620584,0.000014944885,0.000048410206,0.039335776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966742,0.00206838,0.00007111355,0.00025821844,0.0006312758,0.0002967601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938361,0.0042198366,0.0004720781,0.000392917,0.00069265335,0.0003863616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033127358,0.00018144613,0.00026617319,0.0008057419,0.007423754,0.008125996,0.0006100586,0.004762058,0.0039864294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070772837,0.00021121811,0.00030809242,0.0008276385,0.034923017,0.005670927,0.002830611,0.006518277,0.00039766246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005657448,0.0000074848444,0.000078281126,0.000011488111,0.0000013089109,0.000030282443,0.0019794903,0.00007689541,0.000026093621,0.9852527,0.010969797,0.0015605596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009722053,0.000012088828,0.0003341137,0.00016781365,0.0000036564388,0.000059672933,0.0047417353,0.00044772803,0.00016007164,0.87820435,0.11584574,0.000013315846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012181004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011203844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012181004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066441833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005769432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048207164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008172245","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9795.2007.00322.x","title":"WHY RIGHTS? WHY ME?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Judaism; Function (biology); Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.047197380857523896,"score_gpt":0.3497418473697071,"score_spread":0.3025444665121832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008172245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14877419,0.014053154,0.009234735,0.3946381,0.0035429415,0.00004212438,0.00011505018,0.00007487315,0.42952475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95167553,0.0019971041,0.001272845,0.019011797,0.0005980963,0.0000124743265,0.000026690177,0.000019257022,0.025386173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982992,0.001067276,0.000034873225,0.00013197669,0.00025634075,0.00021043167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779594,0.0010140855,0.0002756921,0.0001545599,0.0005342214,0.00022555668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034434814,0.00017753222,0.00017131587,0.0005042011,0.0036780231,0.003756247,0.00034458403,0.0024709478,0.007274738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044663544,0.00009478746,0.00013555128,0.00033143975,0.012217882,0.0024396402,0.001044692,0.0023475683,0.0010665257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030681153,0.000038914808,0.0039150924,0.00006554239,0.000011973905,0.00031415612,0.019387769,0.00004674188,0.00046480392,0.9221565,0.035835885,0.017731931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017357032,0.00005459313,0.005032776,0.000476592,0.000017644561,0.0007897205,0.034116015,0.00037575237,0.0009086247,0.43195292,0.52623117,0.000026850916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026049663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003333393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007274738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019124009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014681519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024336457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064225785","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9795.2008.00343.x","title":"THE UNIVERSALITY OF JEWISH ETHICS: A Rejoinder to Secularist Critics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Universality (dynamical systems); Judaism; Philosophy; Ideology; Modernity; Epistemology; Normative ethics; Religious studies; Theology; Politics; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.09279509995461234,"score_gpt":0.41008864170382253,"score_spread":0.3172935417492102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064225785","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09405419,0.009290007,0.013309262,0.7702966,0.0049307575,0.00003298165,0.000030785726,0.00017949665,0.10787601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9430638,0.0009846451,0.002359841,0.042499922,0.004105514,0.000038843915,0.00001002309,0.000071993156,0.0068654073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98371696,0.009971957,0.00072245015,0.0011098284,0.0034177345,0.0010609967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9676445,0.020212574,0.0016405467,0.0031035794,0.006191813,0.0012070716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029160691,0.0004340647,0.00091134856,0.0017195982,0.0064685536,0.008504051,0.002203022,0.012468357,0.0014864003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02743661,0.0004883105,0.0006525802,0.0009135237,0.06669504,0.0059712552,0.005418678,0.015266203,0.00026404797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002433289,0.000015348363,0.0006735527,0.00003429917,0.000016304608,0.0001512727,0.009472618,0.0001052399,0.0000848215,0.97296596,0.011040383,0.005416021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060783903,0.000042660984,0.0014734345,0.00034929134,0.00003588823,0.00029385986,0.007713331,0.0013872064,0.00047233232,0.8520039,0.13611963,0.00004771861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007058068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029160691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062230527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039255633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15421832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067378780","doi":"10.1111/1467-9795.00113","title":"The <i>Dharma</i> of Ethics, the Ethics of <i>Dharma</i>: Quizzing the Ideals of Hinduism","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hinduism; Dharma; Epistemology; Morality; Presupposition; Sociology; Karma; Philosophy; Philosophy of religion; Religious studies; Environmental ethics; Theology; Buddhism","score_opus":0.1317703935224818,"score_gpt":0.3138062171701938,"score_spread":0.182035823647712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067378780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04630397,0.06557354,0.011967946,0.15352827,0.0042170677,0.000043080287,0.00013387033,0.00010716001,0.7181251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8361133,0.01233251,0.0066756494,0.020021267,0.0015117134,0.00006616224,0.00007015048,0.00007724881,0.12313197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915016,0.00051355176,0.00002125723,0.000064997206,0.00014343672,0.00010662473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994261,0.00022683799,0.00007289968,0.00006113192,0.00009794272,0.00011514165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009941165,0.00028123122,0.0001436052,0.00043242614,0.0045059836,0.0041716485,0.00044928567,0.0016572154,0.0030954576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017787395,0.00016152639,0.000111193556,0.00048424306,0.01044113,0.0022423686,0.0019841064,0.0029198825,0.0010351435],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001843492,0.000009204753,0.00050336926,0.00006309593,0.0000028495504,0.00008138027,0.008436919,0.00006192336,0.0002707199,0.9314275,0.039467137,0.019657463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008643614,0.00003736658,0.002314442,0.00028571914,0.0000053465533,0.00047730253,0.006035335,0.00024672577,0.0006820807,0.26449296,0.7253954,0.000018670456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055559655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01108896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055559655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028417758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002618057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020618558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110695140","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9795.2012.00522.x","title":"DEFENDING NIEBUHR FROM HAUERWAS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Analogy; Idolatry; Natural law; Appeal; Judaism; Natural (archaeology); Torah; Theodicy; Christology; Theology; Religious studies; Law; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.09965157573610114,"score_gpt":0.2966475142634984,"score_spread":0.19699593852739725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110695140","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045767903,0.0111401165,0.02413493,0.192595,0.005570454,0.000057723042,0.00008795336,0.00017473508,0.7204711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.872421,0.0022263573,0.0055504283,0.032420196,0.0012792224,0.00009299386,0.000026925001,0.000094163464,0.08588871],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997218,0.00128934,0.00006652006,0.0004118032,0.00064221513,0.00037208747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982058,0.0011127249,0.0000914699,0.00019159615,0.00029805631,0.00010026334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040730787,0.0004158292,0.00046671394,0.00080340425,0.004087043,0.0043376284,0.0008827918,0.0039613578,0.004334322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008073061,0.00028683766,0.00023661248,0.0005104017,0.015561717,0.005543021,0.0045864168,0.0062986524,0.0010131395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007202328,0.0000034828183,0.000030910003,0.0000053131157,0.0000011654826,0.0000234043,0.0005740544,0.00005094026,0.00003673466,0.99272364,0.0048888847,0.0016542117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000134684,0.000014631022,0.000100603545,0.00009919167,0.0000046607724,0.00005661087,0.0007343034,0.00039526055,0.00033389794,0.76952916,0.2287008,0.00001743602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008223538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010147012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008223538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004325955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029408084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03138715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122200547","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9795.2008.00335.x","title":"THE DUTY TO FEED IN CASES OF ADVANCED DEMENTIA","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Dementia; Duty; Environmental ethics; Islam; Psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Pathology; Disease; Theology","score_opus":0.06417382808272866,"score_gpt":0.3974800658225469,"score_spread":0.33330623773981827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122200547","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6609245,0.01297193,0.0045211515,0.17824103,0.0026002747,0.00011739025,0.00003362248,0.000031370575,0.14055884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871198,0.0024036355,0.0010011926,0.0065224404,0.00034293495,0.000016854046,0.000006765278,0.000004601496,0.0025817647],"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737,0.0017379433,0.000136258,0.00006126408,0.00028013627,0.00041440644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99604887,0.0017202088,0.0011345207,0.00012437924,0.00029129788,0.0006807725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00305548,0.00016043977,0.00022648596,0.00064097915,0.003951654,0.001777497,0.00058735174,0.0046751588,0.002367982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02070642,0.00018021985,0.0001820445,0.0004127385,0.0075349435,0.0017725476,0.0027489958,0.0041232086,0.00033485817],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026435798,0.00051742967,0.04994091,0.0006956057,0.000036014677,0.30915475,0.2954773,0.0006828512,0.0026252437,0.16747221,0.066103645,0.10702973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039368137,0.0003332267,0.019345984,0.0023306152,0.000024878522,0.3865802,0.30012417,0.0011013331,0.0011343394,0.10893716,0.17993341,0.000115323164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011833614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023296468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046751588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001332635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001972652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016159117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122220381","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9795.2009.00398.x","title":"AGREEING TO DISAGREE: Indigenous Pluralism from Human Rights to Bioethics","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Indigenous; Pluralism (philosophy); Human rights; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Law; Philosophy; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.12803435172543357,"score_gpt":0.5240936369787939,"score_spread":0.3960592852533603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122220381","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14202772,0.0047947424,0.03768464,0.5007992,0.0025480902,0.0001139,0.000024529058,0.000037577287,0.31196964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97507113,0.00074803253,0.0038749985,0.015846599,0.00067467,0.000052013995,0.000008346346,0.000016224934,0.0037079523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9300919,0.056055322,0.0013129112,0.0022907436,0.008113576,0.0021356153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.948089,0.039954755,0.0027437012,0.00302939,0.0036669082,0.0025163286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.054558035,0.0002577851,0.00066907017,0.0013277441,0.012000062,0.01027151,0.0023220752,0.0063327644,0.0028370074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054712992,0.00036880458,0.0005770788,0.001067136,0.096432395,0.011804301,0.015941055,0.011825078,0.00023556576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018175982,0.000018395429,0.00036111547,0.000050520488,0.000011689444,0.0003832922,0.06931262,0.00018347535,0.00014859167,0.92229956,0.0025288856,0.0046837153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017247057,0.000015979422,0.000518402,0.00021064063,0.000008507823,0.00017497796,0.03150081,0.000689414,0.00019330872,0.9379502,0.028696124,0.000024370313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062609334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058514527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054558035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059059043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008108321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28853393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131224649","doi":"10.1111/0384-9694.00040","title":"Comment by Arvind Sharma","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Human rights; Relativism; Focus (optics); Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06492396884393113,"score_gpt":0.38119351158695997,"score_spread":0.3162695427430288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131224649","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000103343205,0.0014690644,0.00003385494,0.9544843,0.041242927,0.00001601343,0.00013259992,0.000037544185,0.0024803577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00064985716,0.00043807065,0.00003216066,0.9828652,0.008055221,0.000028907149,0.000026989714,0.000025093992,0.007878424],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930963,0.0010183094,0.00063313585,0.0014112534,0.0029883187,0.0008526594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9823867,0.007820494,0.0012617925,0.00060705055,0.005822116,0.0021019499],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074678254,0.0014334176,0.002185333,0.0013960812,0.0073289475,0.006798147,0.0056774216,0.046238113,0.019524965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052082747,0.0011217532,0.0024745022,0.001868536,0.0040428266,0.007024832,0.0044628493,0.05876371,0.020910563],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000078282,0.0000026888097,0.000027192036,0.00001824327,0.0000022420386,0.000043422926,0.000037305246,0.0000051213697,0.000016764165,0.00035142965,0.99885654,0.0006313574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027684711,0.000013501422,0.0006006848,0.00019127296,0.000014601916,0.00014028505,0.00047387334,0.000044798555,0.00013627102,0.0012574621,0.9970572,0.000042337153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028574048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031638235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046238113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006217532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0118764825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06531751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769194796","doi":"10.1111/jore.12193","title":"Introduction: Ethnography, Moral Theory, and Comparative Religious Ethics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Clair College","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Normative ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Information ethics; Focus (optics); Environmental ethics; Meta-ethics; Social science; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Anthropology","score_opus":0.14772122961902615,"score_gpt":0.4458546034950578,"score_spread":0.29813337387603167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769194796","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029484283,0.121923685,0.050525606,0.4463358,0.03870501,0.00022640849,0.00036275954,0.00024579107,0.31219074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65094453,0.06742817,0.029618323,0.08394785,0.055447266,0.00095798454,0.00036293504,0.00025010476,0.11104287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943447,0.004593551,0.00013469605,0.0002440017,0.00052695116,0.00015606875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97085065,0.025809105,0.0007363212,0.0010115418,0.0010555799,0.0005367905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006596184,0.00048007592,0.00043833922,0.0032260504,0.0040357923,0.0057805125,0.000987043,0.0036210555,0.010407559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011558739,0.00022366212,0.00032356786,0.0026761643,0.015979683,0.0056605497,0.0032483956,0.0043146163,0.0005959126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017892846,0.000032344313,0.0011563888,0.00039314662,0.000008467197,0.000095973606,0.016439635,0.00020318892,0.00011066888,0.87905043,0.07654401,0.025947763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014086575,0.000049391856,0.0024036937,0.002712422,0.000010964254,0.00036861032,0.021426925,0.00064788637,0.00022649964,0.3992388,0.5728732,0.000027578386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019740486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026975987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010407559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002568056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017544467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034884334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990451843","doi":"10.1111/jore.12296","title":"Exploring New and Renewed Eco‐Spiritualities","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Spiritualities; Environmental ethics; Spirituality; Indigenous; Protestantism; Sociology; Diplomacy; Epistemology; Social science; Political science; Philosophy; Ecology; Religious studies; Law","score_opus":0.2543818763575501,"score_gpt":0.3380179288531542,"score_spread":0.08363605249560407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990451843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21027482,0.09640804,0.0085136965,0.117061,0.0017643978,0.00004553934,0.00006076039,0.00006403924,0.56580776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9536522,0.01457268,0.0018511118,0.0051749377,0.00047161747,0.000027823771,0.000018022462,0.000028277731,0.024203489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877745,0.0008825567,0.000018285944,0.000063544176,0.0001135497,0.0001444616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988558,0.00066437887,0.00009370941,0.00007167006,0.0001480849,0.00016623392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019684397,0.0003431392,0.00032456827,0.0010896953,0.0059693647,0.0068222196,0.0004972395,0.001881209,0.0041977665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010572961,0.00009191831,0.00023111717,0.0008511348,0.026927905,0.0041682585,0.002986406,0.0022573434,0.00027348794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017202148,0.000039981853,0.0013208592,0.00020676575,0.0000100863945,0.0005802573,0.18885851,0.00013753604,0.00043864077,0.7653838,0.0076070423,0.035399336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007659465,0.000048028094,0.0035807844,0.0007021947,0.000009072292,0.0007375097,0.21249782,0.00020361264,0.00039605916,0.12979496,0.6520028,0.0000195785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005723399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017658973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068222196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051783687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028370358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037571847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362474822","doi":"10.1111/jore.12425","title":"Reflecting and Advancing the Transformation: Catholic Theological Ethics and the <i>Journal of Religious Ethics</i>, 1973–2023","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"Irish Research eLibrary","keywords":"Humanism; Essentialism; Sociology; Politics; Environmental ethics; Subject (documents); Consciousness; Power (physics); Normative ethics; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Gender studies","score_opus":0.07501231734533272,"score_gpt":0.40518828438125004,"score_spread":0.33017596703591734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362474822","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09884311,0.01371129,0.0025921632,0.35199264,0.002205633,0.0000508164,0.000020697136,0.000028056016,0.53055567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.955948,0.001739576,0.0007341563,0.013377742,0.00046583556,0.000019376303,0.0000068982336,0.000029045419,0.027679317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995382,0.0033527086,0.0000797653,0.00014133027,0.00052735955,0.0005168104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979023,0.0011378247,0.00016988328,0.00011609985,0.00026992065,0.0004039962],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051885783,0.00014858125,0.00015616362,0.00062215637,0.010925238,0.0068486542,0.000465684,0.0029363197,0.0021334623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056909504,0.00017049733,0.00014513088,0.00078623137,0.03848847,0.0027520445,0.0038980187,0.0056141983,0.00021193465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010435976,0.000019435798,0.00047504998,0.00002182899,0.0000017353776,0.00019477132,0.049298435,0.000092472124,0.000111064066,0.9248123,0.0178965,0.0070658987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018740584,0.00001911431,0.003035319,0.0002695812,0.0000040714804,0.00024952844,0.07648842,0.0004422616,0.0004397759,0.21481286,0.70419806,0.000022292274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037936214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060092106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99937785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015323533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013584521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.111180544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391145907","doi":"10.1111/jore.12467","title":"Why Gaps Matter—A Negative Hermeneutical Approach to the Reconciliation Process in the Diocese of British Columbia Based on the Example of Bishop Logan's “Sacred Journey”","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology; Archaeology; History","score_opus":0.10433744562849878,"score_gpt":0.3055058466439625,"score_spread":0.20116840101546374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391145907","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32390147,0.005536074,0.020552982,0.08840765,0.0010924957,0.00019799256,0.00006033642,0.00017753607,0.56007344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9733496,0.00047666888,0.0023537632,0.0018000072,0.000036918573,0.000048699385,0.000013378775,0.0000737684,0.021847159],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856536,0.010407979,0.00019159229,0.00062861055,0.0017211828,0.0013970516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903197,0.006003949,0.00048760418,0.0006714094,0.0016680561,0.00084935885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009575715,0.0005629939,0.0005259928,0.0022156832,0.04150856,0.015293329,0.0027563993,0.0047318353,0.00276877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014473895,0.0004102566,0.0001875367,0.0018639013,0.071126655,0.0058824485,0.008309698,0.008036308,0.0002983763],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027597616,0.000022210059,0.00052316237,0.0000685617,0.000003735544,0.00085724966,0.6693868,0.00016465332,0.0005438903,0.31243747,0.00616558,0.0097990995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009153961,0.000021015503,0.0009596271,0.00040904334,0.000009681307,0.0005034206,0.70385855,0.00063785614,0.0007839766,0.052817635,0.2399294,0.000060623697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40141687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5432458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5985831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041188087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03412664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79816073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}