{"meta":{"query_hash":"c77e2a389396","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics"},"cohort_total":14,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"exported":14,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c77e2a389396","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Religious+Ethics"},"results":[{"id":"W1524391143","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9795.2011.00497.x","title":"THE LASH IS MIGHTIER THAN THE SWORD<sup>1</sup>: Torture and Citizenry in Medieval Muslim Jurisprudence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Torture; SWORD; Jurisprudence; Law; Compromise; Citizenship; Human rights; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Religious studies; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.040376156682424454,"score_gpt":0.30601790729226813,"score_spread":0.2656417506098437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1524391143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77001435,0.044534273,0.000041853487,0.11075845,0.002755926,0.00036563198,0.000006076013,0.000028273693,0.071495175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89795434,0.09644442,0.00012649506,0.0029183773,0.00079055957,0.0000026394036,6.68847e-8,0.000012707784,0.0017503722],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978213,0.00046461195,0.00039451264,0.00012932133,0.00085409073,0.00033620553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977297,0.001340436,0.00032224233,0.000180002,0.00034322627,0.00008438132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004972125,0.00012291757,0.00022075447,0.00006116093,0.0012967233,0.00006333419,0.00056114065,0.00028680864,0.000020729627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010511382,0.00006718313,0.00012628046,0.00019225679,0.0011648057,0.00008566932,0.000090332695,0.0016564658,0.000006220339],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000654228,0.00002368756,0.00296762,0.000012731235,0.000060353326,0.00006806164,0.8743833,0.0000029012383,0.00000401358,0.013593394,0.10667794,0.002140614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004907187,0.00020384198,0.0057692206,0.00018878875,0.00008248058,0.000057420733,0.14149219,0.000026060981,0.00001303969,0.039661776,0.81179094,0.00022353635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001467482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006514634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7328911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001339532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005292496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99734783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1538249942","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9795.2006.00285.x","title":"“NOT ETHICS, NOT ETHICS ALONE, BUT THE HOLY”","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctification; Conflation; Appeal; Epistemology; Philosophy; Key (lock); Sociology; Theology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.11044254504997121,"score_gpt":0.31552000309056993,"score_spread":0.20507745804059874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1538249942","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07237649,0.009295766,0.00068314344,0.781109,0.016931491,0.00049775955,0.00024122478,0.00024411938,0.11862102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93333507,0.0070146583,0.00028335364,0.04205942,0.011270312,0.0000044173607,0.0000129794325,0.0000923421,0.0059274295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99362856,0.0012182556,0.0015185891,0.00034353786,0.0026614703,0.00062958244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889359,0.005761236,0.001297329,0.000670408,0.0031355799,0.00019955386],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01124885,0.00044681414,0.00070784555,0.0002565925,0.0022915876,0.0008002783,0.0011387297,0.0015536076,0.00010239612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003619314,0.00031091567,0.00070939946,0.0001032904,0.0023465825,0.00035031463,0.00016313168,0.019832436,0.00016836563],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021159873,0.00014701812,0.000020434325,0.00023463479,0.00019560807,0.00019846455,0.15461873,0.00017684283,0.00063286,0.77005184,0.073390506,0.00012150289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009250674,0.00031863694,0.00006434566,0.00034754095,0.00028244883,0.0003078082,0.0043106643,0.000031463944,0.0010456117,0.40341288,0.5884648,0.0004887576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039411667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003120892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8609586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012529841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014881828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1838025725","doi":"10.1111/jore.12069","title":"<scp>S</scp>tout, <scp>R</scp>awls, and the Idea of Public Reason","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Public reason; Liberalism; Perception; Philosophy; Backlash; Epistemology; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Democracy; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.040209093995394365,"score_gpt":0.3366561900054626,"score_spread":0.29644709601006825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1838025725","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64421505,0.013941571,0.0035257018,0.081113964,0.0031515649,0.00045097768,0.000010908024,0.000094743584,0.25349554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92052656,0.07086955,0.0005969651,0.0028967282,0.000778633,0.0000033476606,0.0000010913141,0.000023487932,0.0043036463],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957968,0.0015144283,0.0007701883,0.00017170479,0.0013249848,0.00042190656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812203,0.015573279,0.0012014627,0.0002860666,0.0013777694,0.00034112815],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0097769555,0.00017365102,0.0004837869,0.0001441579,0.0008758687,0.00031972438,0.00061774784,0.00054073933,0.0000052466557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04559596,0.00012086692,0.00045068486,0.00044749182,0.0012407516,0.00030345476,0.00007615177,0.0020674483,0.000019702577],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008966569,0.00009681792,0.0026762453,0.00005209301,0.0002115073,0.000008788969,0.16567504,0.00003515021,0.00011805151,0.20928836,0.6205053,0.0013237181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009355324,0.00014209092,0.0003827447,0.00013226553,0.00009852507,0.00008979609,0.0478305,0.00011208726,0.00009330047,0.05059551,0.8995488,0.00003882735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012343935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054266816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27904356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011593641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007574326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9624434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008172245","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9795.2007.00322.x","title":"WHY RIGHTS? WHY ME?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Judaism; Function (biology); Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.047197380857523896,"score_gpt":0.3497418473697071,"score_spread":0.3025444665121832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008172245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25702605,0.08783993,0.032078575,0.12104491,0.011365426,0.0004256129,0.000006319361,0.00017582423,0.49003735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97385347,0.0076974733,0.0015773701,0.012856926,0.002440428,4.2888826e-7,2.4969162e-7,0.000015355983,0.0015582982],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978754,0.0001861587,0.00044755984,0.00009701397,0.0010160117,0.00037788146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976437,0.0007962432,0.00039129631,0.00010643508,0.00083286234,0.00022942435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005235161,0.000103508304,0.00024126926,0.00013977438,0.0005888532,0.00007265654,0.00031933672,0.00028096873,0.000009782348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011265262,0.00008023729,0.00017599211,0.00024800966,0.00034909978,0.00016174288,0.000037857037,0.0010604132,0.00003080016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016298392,0.00023015488,0.030387057,0.000066774475,0.00039194926,0.0009142992,0.1377787,0.000012640877,0.00036744773,0.2524131,0.56184363,0.015431252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003003388,0.000108843524,0.00020978044,0.00008768456,0.000042095504,0.000051721403,0.00730796,4.0071208e-7,0.00019976402,0.073995054,0.9175762,0.00012018097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013902852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012551671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71682745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010328291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026173407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7004127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064225785","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9795.2008.00343.x","title":"THE UNIVERSALITY OF JEWISH ETHICS: A Rejoinder to Secularist Critics","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Universality (dynamical systems); Judaism; Philosophy; Ideology; Modernity; Epistemology; Normative ethics; Religious studies; Theology; Politics; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.09279509995461234,"score_gpt":0.41008864170382253,"score_spread":0.3172935417492102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064225785","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28573507,0.00556272,0.012163286,0.62106544,0.005356023,0.00051872974,0.0000197586,0.00008486073,0.069494136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9489921,0.042300183,0.0013644026,0.005800373,0.0003226681,8.0683577e-7,3.1896028e-7,0.000012061949,0.0012071265],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99677634,0.00090410456,0.00057814614,0.000100346675,0.0013848848,0.0002561807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99289536,0.0034542351,0.00043913952,0.00022726852,0.0027449378,0.00023907264],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005242028,0.0000948705,0.00023396972,0.00007027933,0.0017075128,0.00006916763,0.0004927,0.00050042913,0.000010388166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009658437,0.00007348829,0.00035585256,0.00039067183,0.0009049034,0.00011866881,0.00004716743,0.0029292277,0.000012442691],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000844913,0.00013349048,0.0017334156,0.000039138737,0.00020564171,0.00012227597,0.52356344,0.00024624195,0.00028704567,0.13194808,0.34133324,0.00030346584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003370255,0.00020107078,0.0004289078,0.00015368406,0.00006319042,0.00014089528,0.055884868,0.000013722136,0.00025086882,0.03419833,0.90816253,0.0001649289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016757912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012859773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.663257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022851584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024198443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067378780","doi":"10.1111/1467-9795.00113","title":"The <i>Dharma</i> of Ethics, the Ethics of <i>Dharma</i>: Quizzing the Ideals of Hinduism","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hinduism; Dharma; Epistemology; Morality; Presupposition; Sociology; Karma; Philosophy; Philosophy of religion; Religious studies; Environmental ethics; Theology; Buddhism","score_opus":0.1317703935224818,"score_gpt":0.3138062171701938,"score_spread":0.182035823647712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067378780","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.115019284,0.100682735,0.00017215627,0.68649805,0.006661919,0.00071567245,0.00013498665,0.000047477988,0.09006775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95046186,0.040945273,0.00006696599,0.0070696063,0.0010620772,0.000002474683,6.8725757e-7,0.000031189207,0.00035983932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943364,0.0021406242,0.0016801852,0.0001509978,0.0013430263,0.0003487668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97417754,0.02030512,0.002721488,0.000604131,0.0021125223,0.00007922262],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014992409,0.0002644736,0.000627261,0.000098063094,0.0014059362,0.0000832169,0.0014758841,0.0006405099,0.0002457704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004408857,0.00012738437,0.0005790832,0.00012038205,0.0043450273,0.0001475276,0.00015516768,0.009507291,0.000009549345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015241843,0.00010325908,0.00007748081,0.00023904436,0.0003857923,0.000009176117,0.2451955,0.00012997341,0.00057201687,0.7068806,0.046003617,0.000251093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001181415,0.0008491387,0.000049677386,0.0009815886,0.0006592896,0.00020786525,0.02625972,0.000088487395,0.0055059474,0.6086761,0.355203,0.0003377897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025373304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019886208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8354426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021149392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034906596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110695140","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9795.2012.00522.x","title":"DEFENDING NIEBUHR FROM HAUERWAS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Analogy; Idolatry; Natural law; Appeal; Judaism; Natural (archaeology); Torah; Theodicy; Christology; Theology; Religious studies; Law; Epistemology; History","score_opus":0.09965157573610114,"score_gpt":0.2966475142634984,"score_spread":0.19699593852739725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110695140","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6689814,0.03332889,0.0003888886,0.019415848,0.012356247,0.00009635657,0.000045247787,0.00007146293,0.26531568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899514,0.0010000232,0.0004228345,0.001922651,0.0060464875,3.9924433e-7,0.0000020703978,0.000015452712,0.0006386931],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894345,0.00014243626,0.00035943105,0.00006138452,0.00026337494,0.00022993525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983487,0.00082642055,0.00035972017,0.00012671092,0.00020645422,0.00013197621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010162651,0.00011355515,0.00023068105,0.000098005665,0.00029363812,0.000052809766,0.0002113389,0.00018425561,0.00066470855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029616643,0.00008753425,0.00017965691,0.000018638548,0.0002607862,0.00025749046,0.000030246158,0.001319367,0.00016139526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008380964,0.00009044543,0.0026793552,0.000017954513,0.00017299471,0.000026573773,0.12822905,0.0000072416083,0.000099276025,0.8211316,0.047000557,0.00046112805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000324422,0.00013293928,0.00015981513,0.00009972527,0.00011386097,0.00008585523,0.0015013583,0.0000015970818,0.00019719377,0.33896795,0.65826905,0.00014620183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008242765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006837113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6112685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024470322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000070135684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72780925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122200547","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9795.2008.00335.x","title":"THE DUTY TO FEED IN CASES OF ADVANCED DEMENTIA","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Dementia; Duty; Environmental ethics; Islam; Psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Pathology; Disease; Theology","score_opus":0.06417382808272866,"score_gpt":0.3974800658225469,"score_spread":0.33330623773981827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122200547","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9874572,0.004903438,0.00007317581,0.0035333366,0.0013766459,0.00018992543,0.0000037511836,0.0000055264913,0.0024569705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98911285,0.008267696,0.0005865867,0.0015788847,0.00009424455,0.000004173894,6.1054453e-7,0.000013230966,0.00034169576],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982552,0.00023212569,0.0007206337,0.00010985692,0.00039754613,0.00028465208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817574,0.00074327446,0.00048297184,0.00022481404,0.00023238907,0.00014079742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013693036,0.00010196546,0.000247662,0.000121074685,0.00015857862,0.0000060702673,0.00023764263,0.00013786118,0.000017921378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003016709,0.00007147228,0.000096329546,0.00020009435,0.00010455773,0.000037710466,0.00003496435,0.0008020007,0.000019640118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010094434,0.0032649843,0.24920645,0.0007484899,0.001270063,0.005985536,0.23921034,0.00092086545,0.014049707,0.029528616,0.40934804,0.03637247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.022605589,0.018692564,0.39589342,0.0025374969,0.00041670643,0.013590437,0.049784493,0.000011216908,0.020227589,0.030681,0.44420505,0.0013544406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049295486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009370072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18942584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008186128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002631048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34843385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122220381","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9795.2009.00398.x","title":"AGREEING TO DISAGREE: Indigenous Pluralism from Human Rights to Bioethics","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Bioethics; Indigenous; Pluralism (philosophy); Human rights; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Law; Philosophy; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.12803435172543357,"score_gpt":0.5240936369787939,"score_spread":0.3960592852533603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122220381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6833275,0.0008670264,0.006608907,0.29356727,0.0041993405,0.00092946325,0.000027229613,0.00012837998,0.010344889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8726471,0.00057620474,0.016566494,0.106233574,0.0032712156,0.000005897098,0.0000073551996,0.000051806473,0.00064033095],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99022996,0.0035189763,0.0021613457,0.00041451625,0.0027287835,0.0009464083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9759024,0.018095851,0.001513295,0.0007866256,0.0023700087,0.0013318707],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01846417,0.00035810555,0.0007996853,0.0004654592,0.0035973033,0.00007144711,0.0012724615,0.0022577439,0.00013389534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026326565,0.00028678123,0.00022444404,0.0006686491,0.00028290626,0.00027009807,0.00024260953,0.03223165,0.00068908423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007918603,0.000506327,0.0031010474,0.00024288916,0.0003292745,0.0017346123,0.64726037,0.00030276546,0.008851987,0.09088266,0.24263,0.0033661856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015720531,0.0020461867,0.0034158211,0.0035613892,0.00023366194,0.000083340936,0.006458455,0.0000054776006,0.0006157461,0.7440977,0.23721622,0.0006939528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005055228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048343726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65321505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006253594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013857359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131224649","doi":"10.1111/0384-9694.00040","title":"Comment by Arvind Sharma","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Declaration; Human rights; Relativism; Focus (optics); Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06492396884393113,"score_gpt":0.38119351158695997,"score_spread":0.3162695427430288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131224649","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022370052,0.0022588675,0.0001258141,0.6730231,0.00061230524,0.000089729714,0.000015722153,0.000032442906,0.30147198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93233675,0.017758869,0.00034648154,0.047542896,0.0009958227,6.5655234e-7,0.0000010894383,0.00001244997,0.0010050046],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767536,0.0004852305,0.00041121387,0.000087627275,0.000996969,0.00034360358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788344,0.001165063,0.0001639202,0.00011607984,0.0003037553,0.0003677542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035190668,0.00009323223,0.00019818051,0.000044824945,0.0004611005,0.00007791073,0.00040277358,0.00041684185,0.00044535554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010450803,0.00008149,0.00014657924,0.00014524828,0.00048747726,0.00014478409,0.000017331675,0.0021990107,0.000118702366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080977574,0.00018254961,0.00012299577,0.000026618884,0.00006043536,0.000069652284,0.034147933,0.000025119833,0.0000465283,0.34823313,0.61303633,0.0039677056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002197607,0.00009347782,0.000007987402,0.0000480432,0.0000215183,0.0000138540545,0.00042365314,0.0000036846232,0.000079947386,0.22613363,0.7728705,0.0000839763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044535706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000042736003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9099667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009459254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053482596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.955373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769194796","doi":"10.1111/jore.12193","title":"Introduction: Ethnography, Moral Theory, and Comparative Religious Ethics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Clair College","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Normative ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Information ethics; Focus (optics); Environmental ethics; Meta-ethics; Social science; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Anthropology","score_opus":0.14772122961902615,"score_gpt":0.4458546034950578,"score_spread":0.29813337387603167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769194796","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2569147,0.010350843,0.0023825464,0.6497112,0.010713041,0.00048951805,0.000013593324,0.00014766099,0.069276854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.911366,0.08073189,0.0012291926,0.0026439102,0.0027729291,0.0000027878257,0.0000010162348,0.000014840549,0.0012374327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962031,0.0014800169,0.00060898165,0.00023502212,0.0011277297,0.000345111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938432,0.0024615463,0.0011934559,0.000453852,0.0017296149,0.00031834736],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0096625285,0.00019612326,0.00044761563,0.00015740632,0.0039537405,0.00070672226,0.0006853808,0.0007966612,0.000032857482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073680594,0.00017171456,0.00036562,0.00017493458,0.00232019,0.00050616974,0.00009349681,0.0049250363,0.000027392492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019015837,0.00008291816,0.0019254786,0.0000297353,0.00023462491,0.000043359727,0.33375904,0.000041578674,0.00011481199,0.34149024,0.32158485,0.0005031816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000750465,0.0003447499,0.00092301075,0.00017588306,0.00015752479,0.00023816962,0.06091412,0.000013481346,0.00018675081,0.20452589,0.7314307,0.0003392636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011473459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00087589223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65445125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011893411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091068185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99737066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990451843","doi":"10.1111/jore.12296","title":"Exploring New and Renewed Eco‐Spiritualities","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Spiritualities; Environmental ethics; Spirituality; Indigenous; Protestantism; Sociology; Diplomacy; Epistemology; Social science; Political science; Philosophy; Ecology; Religious studies; Law","score_opus":0.2543818763575501,"score_gpt":0.3380179288531542,"score_spread":0.08363605249560407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990451843","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85959345,0.031590044,0.00006507595,0.024196355,0.0036224683,0.0001379766,0.0000011113066,0.000042865904,0.080750644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8840357,0.10253792,0.0010839856,0.0010049887,0.0018273181,9.775422e-7,1.562548e-7,0.000014106386,0.009494856],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986878,0.00016668887,0.00028157045,0.000083133455,0.00057272677,0.0002080887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863356,0.0006546225,0.00022097121,0.00006759529,0.00026246603,0.00016078746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015654139,0.000080287326,0.00024445498,0.00007122117,0.00032356163,0.000092758906,0.00015457893,0.00014093787,0.000023999333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011848133,0.00007080188,0.00009215011,0.00012863363,0.00020786146,0.00026429974,0.000037730886,0.00057617767,0.000015801967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046578352,0.000029382229,0.01010495,0.00007188219,0.00015023544,0.000025714271,0.7443253,0.00003291642,0.00011045975,0.13174568,0.10663363,0.006723304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069455133,0.00025501457,0.0012027833,0.0002221192,0.00004330087,0.00001146661,0.05181348,0.0000015946172,0.00009433408,0.07950382,0.8659262,0.00023133654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049513765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027391517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75929254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012246043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056547765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7485033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362474822","doi":"10.1111/jore.12425","title":"Reflecting and Advancing the Transformation: Catholic Theological Ethics and the <i>Journal of Religious Ethics</i>, 1973–2023","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"Irish Research eLibrary","keywords":"Humanism; Essentialism; Sociology; Politics; Environmental ethics; Subject (documents); Consciousness; Power (physics); Normative ethics; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Gender studies","score_opus":0.07501231734533272,"score_gpt":0.40518828438125004,"score_spread":0.33017596703591734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362474822","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30141053,0.023162305,0.006012041,0.6314997,0.0025577089,0.00051631115,0.000020626327,0.000081059705,0.034739736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8574435,0.1341762,0.0005196089,0.0069465125,0.0007576819,0.0000012281071,5.2569453e-7,0.000011064091,0.00014369715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99338514,0.0036469416,0.00094557356,0.00011019387,0.0014922557,0.0004198828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9695884,0.02763775,0.00101899,0.0001474818,0.0014004849,0.0002068775],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03933273,0.00016751727,0.00042777605,0.00014361554,0.0026089672,0.0001448686,0.00048023823,0.0005987904,0.0000043736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021565633,0.0000926496,0.00018811291,0.0005904212,0.004368142,0.00022041204,0.00007713419,0.007893704,0.000003178972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021580186,0.000014141449,0.00022823924,0.00007306375,0.00008543235,0.0000688855,0.40719205,0.00059800944,0.00006962478,0.5875422,0.0032819519,0.00063059863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002089418,0.00059732073,0.00020654908,0.00067152554,0.00047734403,0.0039896495,0.12509179,0.00012973479,0.00008298902,0.22790842,0.6383728,0.00038248592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011172815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010481338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6350908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009520099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004315559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391145907","doi":"10.1111/jore.12467","title":"Why Gaps Matter—A Negative Hermeneutical Approach to the Reconciliation Process in the Diocese of British Columbia Based on the Example of Bishop Logan's “Sacred Journey”","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religious Ethics","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology; Archaeology; History","score_opus":0.10433744562849878,"score_gpt":0.3055058466439625,"score_spread":0.20116840101546374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391145907","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7894959,0.0073562656,0.00081988075,0.13192426,0.0010236705,0.0012316225,0.00013000387,0.000031236563,0.06798718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992235,0.0014717465,0.00005899761,0.005603707,0.00017598066,0.000023836394,0.000001409513,0.0000126319455,0.00041669188],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979068,0.0006035004,0.00060630555,0.00010829293,0.0006442286,0.0001308905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99604625,0.002576865,0.00035257795,0.00029154465,0.0007052994,0.000027488122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002981555,0.00008835003,0.00025397583,0.00006242263,0.00027977643,0.00032250318,0.000599271,0.00007584003,0.00004634604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005205615,0.000055626606,0.00012877064,0.00021400378,0.00033559167,0.00008729952,0.00004194957,0.0010497182,0.0000035693226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010230362,0.0003107401,0.0005284105,0.00031288032,0.00016862243,0.000008829792,0.36675996,0.0009098259,0.000008530365,0.010786132,0.6191429,0.00096087356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013131876,0.0014396101,0.0036931382,0.0031222673,0.0003605116,0.000170564,0.253164,0.0038249663,0.00008959203,0.06950443,0.66284627,0.00047147935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046488596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010485964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2027391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004795764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002216512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7027716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}