{"meta":{"query_hash":"ca7240bdff20","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Research in Reading"},"cohort_total":78,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":78,"exported":78,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ca7240bdff20","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Research+in+Reading"},"results":[{"id":"W1513979628","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12022","title":"Evidence for a simplicity principle: teaching common complex grapheme‐to‐phonemes improves reading and motivation in at‐risk readers","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Grapheme; Spelling; Simplicity; Reading (process); Psychology; Phonics; Word (group theory); Intervention (counseling); Mathematics education; Linguistics; Primary education","score_opus":0.22188964666014657,"score_gpt":0.49126133208880934,"score_spread":0.26937168542866274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513979628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99427557,0.00016361185,0.0025478015,0.0013592859,0.00020069738,0.00057433866,0.000003053562,0.00001417136,0.0008614813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853637,0.00010821326,0.013909451,0.00010336489,0.00017710969,0.00005139737,0.0000028376598,0.000027903669,0.00025601723],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99610084,0.0012188503,0.0009672687,0.0003954268,0.00058227876,0.0007353044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919172,0.006907554,0.0004233244,0.00028249953,0.00022232471,0.00024708643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016638575,0.000179819,0.00047258497,0.0017180741,0.0003361755,0.0001312255,0.00037089945,0.00012159394,0.0000127648855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006160686,0.00015950191,0.00007551725,0.00064709934,0.000110162735,0.00036952258,0.00016688755,0.001146345,0.000004335893],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011166901,0.00013040836,0.8454522,0.0002054104,0.000060455313,0.000032567965,0.023206646,0.00015343292,0.024773372,0.002368768,0.0015940517,0.10090603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017389229,0.00077829976,0.9775088,0.0030466737,0.000011313694,0.000106023304,0.0032136394,0.0024591768,0.00083209947,0.0037233818,0.006324051,0.0002576277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007212287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014424905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13205662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000459679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005850866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73753613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1562307116","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01486.x","title":"One complicated extended family: the influence of alphabetic knowledge and vocabulary on phonemic awareness","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Phonemic awareness; Phonological awareness; Psychology; Vocabulary; Literacy; Vocabulary development; Phonology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Teaching method; Mathematics education; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.18032857860941903,"score_gpt":0.43771808141426954,"score_spread":0.2573895028048505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1562307116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99085724,0.001403265,0.00002999845,0.00019257593,0.00014006524,0.00016527121,0.0000013569316,0.000006154481,0.007204054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989301,0.00029191325,0.00043084493,0.00003809487,0.00004840258,0.000012526292,5.2532386e-7,0.000014779538,0.00023279055],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775785,0.00064665807,0.0005972514,0.00018937829,0.00042749045,0.00038138358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980408,0.00097371143,0.00022960808,0.00029770684,0.00033526713,0.0001229033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004016071,0.00010527164,0.00030783282,0.0007279953,0.00010490346,0.00002294787,0.000466887,0.0000816785,0.000033232016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018826545,0.000074523196,0.000044261153,0.0006547685,0.0002980406,0.000100657744,0.00009397503,0.00083302736,0.000029808312],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0047881496,0.004180258,0.48202974,0.00072886806,0.00092190434,0.0010155509,0.18251944,0.00014089537,0.14354214,0.018512337,0.0037465056,0.1578742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008375781,0.0004654672,0.98966783,0.0014761604,0.0000097215125,0.00012505494,0.0013313022,0.00004350365,0.002825682,0.0025833808,0.00053752254,0.00009678648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024748503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003899712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5076381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098928285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001488148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36191356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1562600285","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01469.x","title":"A follow‐up study of the ABRACADABRA web‐based literacy intervention in Grade 1","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Phonics; Literacy; Psychology; Reading comprehension; Intervention (counseling); Reading (process); Comprehension; Developmental psychology; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Primary education; Linguistics","score_opus":0.09296566562474538,"score_gpt":0.47772240623368584,"score_spread":0.38475674060894044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1562600285","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959716,0.00010023386,0.000013450504,0.0006216746,0.0015250756,0.00034094887,0.0000011379902,0.000004267846,0.0014215898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984004,0.0000057653256,0.00036319115,0.000019681886,0.00011741585,0.000023162067,4.760223e-7,0.000015564294,0.0010543774],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99628866,0.0012554935,0.0010089972,0.00019198263,0.00085054187,0.00040431376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796003,0.00090844237,0.0003893304,0.00035499965,0.0002933296,0.00009384762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008854996,0.00010875718,0.00029991555,0.0015374665,0.00007033099,0.00007847438,0.0006475255,0.00010226182,0.00016690872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007424874,0.00007366886,0.00014400318,0.0012622942,0.000079355596,0.00024677522,0.00009749271,0.002191407,0.000008608376],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060654175,0.0025783628,0.92493224,0.000074849304,0.00007211729,0.00032956846,0.02912185,0.000029645762,0.008205537,0.00046576426,0.0009611609,0.032622352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009321984,0.0010368087,0.96906,0.00206174,0.0000124274175,0.00013525765,0.0093136225,0.0005485365,0.0015305869,0.0012038936,0.0056113685,0.00016377849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000488281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003689334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044127747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013875049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014667858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9520694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1579563004","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12031","title":"Effects of text structure, reading goals and epistemic beliefs on conceptual change","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Conceptual change; Psychology; Reading (process); Metacognition; Reading comprehension; Comprehension; Cognition; Think aloud protocol; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Protocol analysis; Affect (linguistics); Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Mathematics education; Cognitive science; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.13196606629650526,"score_gpt":0.4456640408362205,"score_spread":0.31369797453971526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1579563004","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.990324,0.0015908871,0.000012479577,0.0011193126,0.0004920987,0.00018357493,0.0000026707146,0.000004490903,0.006270458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99853736,0.0002927573,0.00026140406,0.000059218535,0.00057613093,0.000009196806,8.7169076e-7,0.000012868757,0.00025019993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979288,0.00065566937,0.00043209462,0.00016916094,0.0004342048,0.0003800755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954486,0.0038236687,0.00027203825,0.00014622584,0.00019492337,0.00011454827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002393883,0.00010499644,0.0003398395,0.0005316631,0.00008275313,0.000034542405,0.0002497184,0.0001257455,0.000051502477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090004614,0.000081870545,0.000049246424,0.00029655301,0.00034430256,0.00013017296,0.000051310904,0.00066164,0.0000072320677],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010373543,0.0004176983,0.29931596,0.0013477701,0.00028441742,0.00035648904,0.028815793,0.000047817375,0.04382982,0.57256603,0.0059291297,0.0460517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023584645,0.0034583297,0.9274939,0.0034657673,0.000021039454,0.00041139533,0.013036473,0.000024826193,0.007313969,0.039176114,0.0029657308,0.0002740178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002545384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000096625035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62817794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011390988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005145891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33385837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599271376","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01483.x","title":"Examining teachers' beliefs about and implementation of a balanced literacy framework","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Education and Early Childhood Development","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Reading (process); Psychology; Certification; Mathematics education; Quality (philosophy); Pedagogy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.13529887394877346,"score_gpt":0.4819639844748895,"score_spread":0.34666511052611604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599271376","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99334276,0.00081832946,0.00045254736,0.000083017214,0.00024068932,0.00011610285,0.00000143467,0.0000047226677,0.0049404274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97809154,0.00018021622,0.021293512,0.000022566335,0.00012121873,0.000009098149,7.730658e-7,0.000013066594,0.00026803953],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979679,0.000403622,0.00067928527,0.00015983488,0.0004172313,0.00037213674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845916,0.000712029,0.000309481,0.00015519085,0.0002434203,0.00012074502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046551446,0.00008808708,0.00025518876,0.00086419383,0.00005796249,0.00004364715,0.00019994262,0.000089053356,0.0003337115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025145954,0.00007544215,0.000034822657,0.00045173633,0.00008161229,0.0002675284,0.00005533602,0.00075641164,0.0000062966496],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120191035,0.000073786185,0.62541497,0.0000469813,0.00006662996,0.00013326133,0.2298406,4.0879104e-7,0.0010652485,0.0019255298,0.0002506088,0.1410618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096606056,0.00050961244,0.97002614,0.001561567,0.000006677904,0.00013214658,0.021080635,0.0000062670383,0.0012129028,0.0029851906,0.0014143527,0.00009844124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002581775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002927391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34461117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009742015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000796186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3653907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1834674350","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9817.2011.01502.x","title":"Text features and preschool teachers’ use of print referencing","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Education and Early Childhood Development","funders":"Institute of Education Sciences","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Psychology; Sentence; Linguistics; Mathematics education; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.24506571105992372,"score_gpt":0.4353986080198928,"score_spread":0.19033289695996905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1834674350","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98541117,0.0005058391,0.000046373374,0.000103728875,0.00016815157,0.00011593394,7.856727e-7,0.0000049163336,0.013643088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885549,0.0001283477,0.008867037,0.0000120986315,0.00007016361,0.0000046223818,2.5136396e-7,0.000013200939,0.0023494074],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980247,0.0004883566,0.00052842323,0.00016159892,0.00044020798,0.0003566934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860436,0.0005526446,0.0002276996,0.00020176702,0.00025333418,0.00016018939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037986988,0.00009089861,0.00025580567,0.00090282963,0.00005544295,0.000052776388,0.0002223441,0.000101640195,0.00013826744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068091025,0.00006932733,0.000046188306,0.0003035609,0.000106992615,0.00026990223,0.00008982796,0.0010562444,0.000007324118],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010392548,0.0004167459,0.66741437,0.00015633696,0.00030401876,0.0010569663,0.18162626,0.000007685578,0.011907405,0.0070021483,0.009640305,0.1194285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007527252,0.00038766852,0.98095834,0.0012177504,0.000008932447,0.000623714,0.005887835,0.00000833356,0.0036148308,0.0012439237,0.005177511,0.00011844457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065128383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014158471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31354395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011362825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010737978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45889148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1892609784","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12048","title":"Metacognitive online reading strategy use: Readers' perceptions in L1 and L2","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Psychology; Metacognition; Perception; Test (biology); Mathematics education; Cognition; Linguistics","score_opus":0.49108087920001237,"score_gpt":0.5810435834727796,"score_spread":0.08996270427276726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1892609784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9883218,0.0003469939,0.0017348839,0.0009112667,0.00024279847,0.00013533027,0.0000047529898,0.00001246554,0.008289734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98096555,0.00007280791,0.016767481,0.000049825358,0.00032165836,0.000004976249,0.000003927976,0.00002603331,0.0017877312],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99274063,0.0052026855,0.0006520563,0.00025402266,0.00057075894,0.00057983526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99638915,0.0023094614,0.00022105096,0.00016248699,0.00070804195,0.00020979288],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023838498,0.00013582812,0.00039023353,0.0022735589,0.00010858854,0.00011592251,0.00020830487,0.00016177265,0.00008337902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005014047,0.00011780044,0.000049049202,0.0013274896,0.00024494936,0.00045175475,0.000066461755,0.0034301614,0.000015714457],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013853781,0.00090692687,0.7161983,0.00007772163,0.00025242474,0.0028059739,0.108352676,0.0004377976,0.0073494273,0.008120127,0.0038895626,0.15022364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033649758,0.0014553415,0.7785256,0.0013878903,0.000025115674,0.0009164104,0.20455527,0.0005251622,0.000074995005,0.005635216,0.0032286684,0.00030534275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086771377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007601731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1499183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003232965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020081458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99886894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1924072852","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01484.x","title":"Cross‐language transfer of morphological awareness in Chinese–English bilinguals","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":264,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Vocabulary; Phonological awareness; Reading comprehension; Comprehension; Reading (process); Linguistics; Structural equation modeling; Transfer of training; Literacy; Language transfer; Vocabulary development; Positive transfer; Nonverbal communication; Comprehension approach; Cognitive psychology; Language education; Computer science; Mathematics education; Developmental psychology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.14034593967534467,"score_gpt":0.48009737825954507,"score_spread":0.3397514385842004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1924072852","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98488,0.0005581751,0.000086131375,0.000032801992,0.0005550835,0.0001398546,0.0000037735897,0.000008191446,0.013735998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980403,0.000063097665,0.0012654697,0.000014221092,0.00017407142,0.00000974761,0.0000012453268,0.000017813134,0.00041404503],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99682254,0.0007112486,0.0010525648,0.00023898522,0.00060377107,0.00057089474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822825,0.00081479666,0.00012625198,0.00024875771,0.00043625152,0.00014569136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008150195,0.0001363267,0.0004827967,0.0015315623,0.000043449847,0.000033668246,0.0005201798,0.00018115879,0.00085642125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010765716,0.00009797366,0.00011775686,0.001133086,0.0002060681,0.00019404273,0.000053209704,0.0011670185,0.000012006597],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000668215,0.00049301947,0.88907665,0.00006957851,0.00004281251,0.004840098,0.09363253,0.000019698424,0.0037027998,0.00036620622,0.000060614886,0.0070277983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025285883,0.00054145325,0.97889644,0.000892646,0.000004857293,0.00054884295,0.009430709,0.000020689919,0.0052753338,0.0011722817,0.0004874515,0.00020068468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060637743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002848754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08981983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013229251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016394568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93772125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1924607882","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9817.2011.01490.x","title":"Beyond language borders: orthographic processing and word reading in Spanish–English bilinguals","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University; Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Orthographic projection; Psychology; Linguistics; Orthography; Scripting language; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07908351835556507,"score_gpt":0.4303274845181597,"score_spread":0.3512439661625947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1924607882","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96300614,0.002843044,0.000030040037,0.000109035376,0.0003743946,0.00019013877,0.000001026389,0.000019062187,0.0334271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99262583,0.00028741432,0.0062552765,0.000038370366,0.0002450028,0.000013311454,0.0000011333826,0.000034017572,0.00049964373],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99681664,0.00056582515,0.00088576804,0.0003440145,0.00059360487,0.0007941486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834466,0.0005593058,0.00028864504,0.00022168168,0.00036171416,0.0002239735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008723058,0.00017428891,0.00042290575,0.0029469954,0.00011419504,0.00014829417,0.00034220127,0.00016205471,0.0001187453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009145389,0.00015159955,0.00006468734,0.0017810559,0.00017787324,0.00047684705,0.00009136547,0.0014412489,0.0000063400325],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037501272,0.00026653867,0.60414404,0.00017996892,0.00005768504,0.002960514,0.21347825,0.0000021150581,0.00088263984,0.0012532905,0.00027415287,0.17612576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0058864155,0.0011059914,0.7020242,0.010532012,0.000041026608,0.0014210339,0.25539228,0.00012975273,0.0019898852,0.0111540435,0.009252812,0.0010705118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044220788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000102306796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17505525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013913093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019428918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62615895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968665795","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.00378.x","title":"Understanding of the alphabetic principle through invented spelling among hearing‐impaired children learning to read and write: experimentation with a pedagogical approach","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Hearing Impairment and Communication","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Spelling; Psychology; Hearing impaired; Reading (process); Linguistics; Hearing loss; Learning to read; Audiology","score_opus":0.5680904369862447,"score_gpt":0.49315846553062415,"score_spread":0.07493197145562058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968665795","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99410665,0.00017081386,0.0024690393,0.00032991735,0.000032351996,0.0003681299,2.0193055e-7,0.0000090627145,0.0025138392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962824,0.00007803683,0.0032766678,0.000013129383,0.000051927298,0.000009100559,0.000001046337,0.000017156783,0.000270507],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976114,0.0008236851,0.0004404395,0.00016765365,0.0006201187,0.00033670545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902767,0.00029731364,0.00022255443,0.00023910232,0.00010817459,0.00010520602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024780754,0.00009693366,0.00022815946,0.00036044826,0.00028643446,0.000041039795,0.00028617273,0.00007253507,0.000017314693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001672373,0.00006878214,0.000047674588,0.0007352325,0.00034418824,0.00021910017,0.00014375415,0.0009068461,0.0000014637466],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003110605,0.00019537756,0.949587,0.000024863983,0.00005598784,0.000018215544,0.045866534,0.0009299874,0.0011748662,0.0016189375,0.00003640223,0.00018074918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019429156,0.0012679575,0.9429016,0.0009425347,0.000016251082,0.0005584814,0.049295913,0.0014326433,0.0010643958,0.0003467686,0.000072862254,0.00015768677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003776944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013897962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006685428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027726623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007890779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39398456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983448010","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9817.2005.00280.x","title":"A validation of the Dyslexia Adult Screening Test (DAST) in a post‐secondary population","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Dyslexia; Psychology; Learning disability; Test (biology); Population; Developmental psychology; Clinical psychology; Reading (process); Medicine; Linguistics","score_opus":0.060707581535431425,"score_gpt":0.419484672457146,"score_spread":0.35877709092171456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983448010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99331033,0.00015330205,0.000075818316,0.0018000584,0.00016555363,0.00015125825,0.000002268133,0.0000034919196,0.004337922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961332,0.000017101687,0.0029943278,0.000051488496,0.00016710207,0.000005646678,0.0000026808261,0.0000119324795,0.00061653904],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997651,0.00050794793,0.00077009463,0.0001335098,0.00061141845,0.0003260619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982639,0.0007888067,0.0003237259,0.00017624181,0.00038380074,0.00006352759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042897947,0.00007897142,0.00019975018,0.0010802379,0.00006793668,0.00004259082,0.00029276535,0.00008265642,0.000120362805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011834672,0.00005816402,0.00006722321,0.0008772105,0.000047195383,0.0003079701,0.000054785658,0.00091816945,0.0000096436925],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023202621,0.00019256496,0.8787473,0.00003939358,0.000028065997,0.000049062975,0.008169402,0.00042516927,0.004287093,0.0008667993,0.00045976505,0.10650335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010733212,0.0001610571,0.9923049,0.0012161261,0.0000036482,0.00014155355,0.0015861774,0.000434219,0.0021039543,0.00037872014,0.0005209376,0.000075348325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048467744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007029525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11355763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026993436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012424146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39890403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990215054","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9817.2004.00230.x","title":"An investigation of Grade 5 children's knowledge of the doubling rule in spelling","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Spelling; Pronunciation; Psychology; Linguistics; Grammar; Reading (process); Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.09968901452854548,"score_gpt":0.4386488999355557,"score_spread":0.3389598854070103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990215054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976394,0.0004236421,0.000055826884,0.0003561446,0.00025360216,0.00013552397,8.885324e-7,0.000002436506,0.0011325183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99752486,0.000053043655,0.002205041,0.000006988459,0.00012462593,0.0000018988019,8.6374837e-7,0.000011632523,0.0000710272],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978341,0.00052292243,0.00077647925,0.00013471975,0.00042692263,0.0003048969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988204,0.00030475055,0.00033392126,0.00021604955,0.00023415653,0.00009069311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005813639,0.00007835485,0.00024481938,0.0011833559,0.000046587396,0.000025998777,0.00043361454,0.000083454535,0.000016064218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017144243,0.000057175497,0.00006643611,0.0012279369,0.00015005824,0.00021370042,0.00004202461,0.00082930055,0.000004316762],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010981005,0.00028971044,0.92894095,0.00007809714,0.000039321043,0.000026373198,0.04124441,0.0028510606,0.019274635,0.0034982031,0.0000358785,0.0036115453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020814564,0.00021572608,0.93394285,0.0028594804,0.0000061486085,0.00011488635,0.0032508685,0.00009328461,0.04134358,0.015920438,0.000062177874,0.00010911237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004488666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028480954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037993543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022862008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026867614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36029443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998550529","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9817.2004.00227.x","title":"Predicting growth of nonword reading and letter‐sound knowledge following rime‐ and phoneme‐based teaching","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Hard rime; Psychology; Reading (process); Phonological awareness; Phonemic awareness; Rhyme; Test (biology); Linguistics; Phonology; Audiology; Sound (geography); Cognitive psychology; Poetry; Art","score_opus":0.06387004304551985,"score_gpt":0.4234587145678116,"score_spread":0.35958867152229174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998550529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98826957,0.0012533034,0.0008495962,0.00071489817,0.00052433275,0.00017133469,0.0000014159742,0.000014732942,0.008200814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911999,0.0000415199,0.00816376,0.000046165947,0.00032019752,0.0000070614583,0.0000010069834,0.00003323498,0.00018712669],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969001,0.00062976166,0.00090302766,0.00032013576,0.00060465664,0.0006423188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99734855,0.0016949391,0.0003367705,0.00018661232,0.00020024665,0.00023288821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010002187,0.000185835,0.0004910931,0.0016337696,0.0002854471,0.00013387411,0.00026651664,0.00013282518,0.000010584262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010249267,0.00016614137,0.0001011332,0.00055457617,0.00015524516,0.00038003837,0.00011829501,0.0015120644,0.0000036327656],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053472334,0.0004957756,0.87710613,0.00062701124,0.0003903321,0.0014351313,0.065687135,0.000063295105,0.02597555,0.0057223104,0.0008027221,0.021159884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.061784472,0.007810912,0.66315126,0.08051147,0.0005188719,0.006388626,0.05557783,0.003325068,0.053663988,0.04627269,0.017085733,0.0039090514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047872035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001821452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21395485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003076936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016906176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67750484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000015551","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.00109","title":"The literacy curriculum and use of an Integrated Learning System","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Education and Technology Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Phonics; Psychology; Presentation (obstetrics); Mathematics education; Literacy; Language arts; Primary education; Pedagogy; Computer-Assisted Instruction","score_opus":0.07125151624960638,"score_gpt":0.4600629911403337,"score_spread":0.3888114748907273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000015551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966241,0.00016332688,0.000018499488,0.0014734216,0.00007264376,0.000065536435,1.7812404e-7,0.00000880797,0.0015734818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974675,0.00081514625,0.00082061667,0.0000033548845,0.00006207505,0.0000017368823,2.7791478e-7,0.0000026807345,0.0008265967],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826115,0.0009172337,0.0002512654,0.00005426461,0.0003502459,0.00016582561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985637,0.0006714415,0.0001107848,0.00006058994,0.0005291316,0.00006433703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051834043,0.000030654115,0.00008478882,0.00030025156,0.0003837007,0.00018140496,0.0001650523,0.000061921884,0.000026441325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015578835,0.000019361882,0.000019009225,0.0006304613,0.00027695272,0.0005267458,0.000008304696,0.0006516228,0.000002013735],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071402945,0.00011411682,0.14276586,0.00003034058,0.000021612324,0.000039591934,0.029663222,0.00006881167,0.00046494382,0.055360205,0.0003717589,0.7710281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059719995,0.00073621277,0.01712375,0.0025459025,0.000011614427,0.00014338447,0.5390184,0.0069261794,0.0007780191,0.0022421246,0.42971838,0.0001588451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017891936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036888997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77086926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014928899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017807279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29511544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011208654","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01392.x","title":"Flexibility in young second‐language learners: examining the language specificity of orthographic processing","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Orthographic projection; Psychology; Reading (process); Linguistics; Transfer of training; Context (archaeology); Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1047844681735982,"score_gpt":0.441499145187445,"score_spread":0.3367146770138468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011208654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9750996,0.001848596,0.000046140776,0.00024834622,0.0001522153,0.00017112777,0.0000013079073,0.000008660324,0.022424012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982752,0.000040278766,0.0007690824,0.000026857142,0.00016000064,0.0000039728675,0.0000010441591,0.000012391216,0.00071116065],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965455,0.0009779981,0.0009259105,0.0002552039,0.000723006,0.000572377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983385,0.00069685845,0.00035946694,0.00032088734,0.00018518994,0.00009910571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013181828,0.00013039724,0.00037101362,0.0013719819,0.00009244615,0.0000888042,0.000488348,0.000107048785,0.00019702408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055135554,0.0000915007,0.00008412075,0.0016561892,0.00016903925,0.000262715,0.000046180092,0.0016189923,0.00000496111],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005235584,0.00042828513,0.5829419,0.00014927807,0.000043891243,0.0012577503,0.19297066,0.0000745093,0.018734792,0.00051480375,0.00019121682,0.20216939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010104657,0.0003954843,0.88516533,0.0014642966,0.0000054969114,0.00031111477,0.10882837,0.00013549517,0.001745318,0.00055099797,0.0002295072,0.00015812613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024174838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000170422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30222344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001815268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014591168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70338064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017181028","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.00371.x","title":"Revisiting print exposure: exploring differential links to vocabulary, comprehension and reading rate","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University; Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Reading (process); Psychology; Reading comprehension; Vocabulary; Comprehension; Variance (accounting); Test (biology); Literacy; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.20608454902910567,"score_gpt":0.4164800832950463,"score_spread":0.21039553426594065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017181028","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947581,0.0005105158,0.0007266118,0.0008948607,0.0006470803,0.00021727532,6.159401e-7,0.000019808129,0.0022250977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941884,0.00063813786,0.0038042408,0.0000583893,0.00064530893,0.00002156718,0.0000011515101,0.000033680713,0.00060908654],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99637187,0.0008629882,0.00094498665,0.00036603658,0.00071280374,0.0007412988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99774796,0.0010241185,0.00023100736,0.00026978573,0.00033490403,0.00039220246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048427708,0.00018682575,0.00048103675,0.0014469082,0.00032909168,0.00012083871,0.0003003947,0.00014777592,0.000068501904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005206869,0.00016195548,0.000082241,0.0006801798,0.000090922425,0.0003209167,0.00023362624,0.0018250702,0.000036596848],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021076347,0.00037192652,0.48365423,0.00046066183,0.0003376273,0.011583132,0.08050379,0.00027453658,0.09521068,0.003788509,0.0023073761,0.3193999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030207143,0.0009892104,0.95358527,0.0076300083,0.000019830468,0.0037662534,0.005996533,0.00032131537,0.006105392,0.00046350702,0.01749983,0.0006021313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008105613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000011540834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46993104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025193734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000081245904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79291236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047493729","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.00370.x","title":"Children's inference generation across different media","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":312,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Institutes of Health; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; McGill University","keywords":"Vocabulary; Comprehension; Inference; Narrative; Psychology; Set (abstract data type); Point (geometry); Vocabulary development; Language development; Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1903275886756673,"score_gpt":0.4788730379923064,"score_spread":0.2885454493166391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047493729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967715,0.0004356045,0.00025693787,0.00030380642,0.00078200415,0.000097432676,0.0000025177776,0.00000799832,0.0013421793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99711925,0.0003547635,0.0006634316,0.000027884074,0.0009752762,0.000008824639,0.000004927017,0.00001319726,0.00083243527],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974627,0.0004423273,0.00057555345,0.00018238656,0.0007901167,0.00054693857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985073,0.00065937854,0.0001692734,0.00019207885,0.00028972453,0.00018224119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024998358,0.00010772857,0.00025367935,0.00056457304,0.00019636951,0.00006390212,0.0003175439,0.00009758099,0.00012790436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005204393,0.000081801234,0.00006503104,0.0004525666,0.00012990933,0.00019404528,0.00006618453,0.00094518176,0.000057218687],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012751098,0.0002639923,0.9186187,0.000010843858,0.0000732381,0.0008216213,0.03738248,0.00004402118,0.0024502028,0.000740785,0.0064922133,0.03297441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010230687,0.00017490107,0.9934501,0.00023405263,0.0000022825639,0.0008711905,0.00076812913,0.000080435864,0.0015014333,0.00031106002,0.0014543073,0.00012900894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000083367624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001588218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07483145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022390197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010235768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4106397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052912771","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01423.x","title":"Sensitivity to linguistic stress, phonological awareness and early reading ability in preschoolers","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Phonological awareness; Psychology; Reading (process); Stress (linguistics); Phonology; Linguistics; Phonemic awareness; Language development; Phonological development; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.07133031808598878,"score_gpt":0.43331304053323455,"score_spread":0.3619827224472458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052912771","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99599624,0.00007499017,0.00007045058,0.0005662709,0.0007978153,0.00022985035,0.0000031647646,0.000011932423,0.002249264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964908,0.000021870472,0.0029738771,0.00002150327,0.00029369016,0.000013207103,5.4016493e-7,0.000015554126,0.00016899052],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967282,0.0009195496,0.0007096854,0.0003873727,0.0005498809,0.0007053267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966469,0.0021953012,0.00014580744,0.00029312423,0.0003575694,0.00036131992],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01108643,0.00015056053,0.0004237855,0.0012056368,0.000117908574,0.00014653601,0.00025606912,0.00019985688,0.000048084417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053189043,0.00012765134,0.000051690586,0.0007458859,0.00017535803,0.0001651414,0.00014967409,0.0024777444,0.00001825831],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003646072,0.00017534143,0.9645507,0.000047615762,0.000020693826,0.0015477743,0.007950036,0.000045743647,0.0137203,0.00072893855,0.0001057496,0.0107424995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064018794,0.00019974,0.99378484,0.0006439046,0.0000032146504,0.00021841342,0.000969832,0.0000930692,0.001102647,0.0011411215,0.0010540044,0.00014902167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00171959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028122342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029234143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022331187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018210217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056385340","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01401.x","title":"Simple but complex: components of the simple view of reading across grade levels","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":335,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Institute of Education Sciences","keywords":"Reading comprehension; Fluency; Psychology; Reading (process); Variance (accounting); Comprehension; Listening comprehension; Active listening; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Mathematics education; Linguistics; Communication","score_opus":0.260098519324463,"score_gpt":0.5006379042545763,"score_spread":0.24053938493011334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056385340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99496245,0.0003545596,0.00012253849,0.0008086088,0.00033071975,0.00029198884,0.000028782059,0.000006785221,0.0030935914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99833554,0.00007138982,0.0010432499,0.000071330374,0.00013057822,0.0000043321056,0.00000401353,0.000018935541,0.00032062744],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99540746,0.0009441685,0.0014312948,0.00023295512,0.0011873615,0.00079675333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967581,0.001350377,0.0007412149,0.00048117776,0.00049701205,0.00017214286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066225436,0.00017383067,0.00067705766,0.0005544549,0.00019491241,0.000053983742,0.0009598587,0.00011929489,0.00014494013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005358165,0.00012342578,0.0002175272,0.001126841,0.000248626,0.00019576274,0.00015430801,0.001014624,0.000010092978],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00095792155,0.0017328233,0.4776548,0.0005839381,0.0004965667,0.00054659124,0.036945384,0.00030641907,0.30275252,0.008609898,0.010834657,0.15857846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016064881,0.00040918766,0.9559606,0.0014558434,0.000011592387,0.00028089705,0.0025964188,0.00012666424,0.0104038995,0.0058651455,0.021107398,0.0001758636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004184311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001006634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4783058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023964285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000111349545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5033157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078027032","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9817.2007.00351.x","title":"Relationship between L1 and L2 word‐level reading and phonological processing in adults learning English as a second language","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Victoria","funders":"University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Reading (process); Psychology; Mandarin Chinese; Linguistics; Phonological awareness; Word recognition; Phonology; Word identification; Metalinguistics; Identification (biology); Vocabulary development","score_opus":0.1113634160079957,"score_gpt":0.4431806055177861,"score_spread":0.3318171895097904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078027032","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885826,0.001390285,0.000087049324,0.00016378368,0.00010906414,0.00014387317,0.0000010029637,0.000015674026,0.009506658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957193,0.00003771498,0.0024314038,0.000018212853,0.0003038617,0.0000050324065,0.0000023927716,0.0000198722,0.0014621913],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728733,0.0005277865,0.0007640111,0.00030500995,0.00044689426,0.00066898577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964023,0.0028163407,0.00024646975,0.000102275684,0.00020135919,0.00023123184],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011502738,0.00014067121,0.00034209687,0.0017041027,0.00018247424,0.00014947561,0.00017235125,0.00021922776,0.000057269404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034907598,0.00012343122,0.000031081207,0.0008596257,0.00013770499,0.00036972642,0.00009252404,0.0024427248,0.000006845269],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031192,0.00003398437,0.84625185,0.00010106998,0.000010345421,0.0007851806,0.06923535,0.000002219559,0.00012457986,0.00027597675,0.000047778078,0.08281978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013679817,0.0002076849,0.9639745,0.0018141442,0.000004231224,0.0002874102,0.03019598,0.000021879165,0.00010968667,0.00068965566,0.0011829447,0.0001439486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013536727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000058538786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11772264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002387894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000935394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090630378","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00313.x","title":"The role of stress processing abilities in the development of bilingual reading","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Stress (linguistics); Prosody; Reading (process); Syllable; Linguistics; Neuroscience of multilingualism; Set (abstract data type); First language; Computer science","score_opus":0.05863172801033756,"score_gpt":0.42553499416758,"score_spread":0.36690326615724245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090630378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9837571,0.0021418675,0.000026611595,0.00023952064,0.00012802533,0.00017633222,0.0000012738006,0.0000031552836,0.01352616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997328,0.00003374134,0.0020949491,0.0000035985718,0.00012588815,0.000009130674,9.618088e-7,0.000012955953,0.00039076243],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99625915,0.0007477379,0.0012965715,0.00016083894,0.0010101149,0.0005256059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963651,0.0024435478,0.00048596764,0.0002279843,0.00043563603,0.000041801653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013970177,0.000114371986,0.00030386826,0.0008103129,0.00019272893,0.000081571685,0.00066016504,0.000077634686,0.0000121287785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049905275,0.00006547988,0.0000650286,0.0009783184,0.00025208807,0.00014788136,0.00006688577,0.0007840408,0.0000016459825],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054321025,0.0006262004,0.553754,0.00035000438,0.00007513353,0.00012177416,0.19900659,0.00035042994,0.0056754067,0.009295912,0.0002836377,0.22991775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023599106,0.00054300803,0.37014323,0.008436319,0.000019015606,0.00029809642,0.51097864,0.00041166763,0.056323655,0.022493422,0.027540535,0.00045246535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000297879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014639978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31197208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022157324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006041326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48418123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092570100","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00306.x","title":"Editorial: Prosodic sensitivity and reading development","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Citation; Reading (process); Library science; Media studies; History; Sociology; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.043527068795252234,"score_gpt":0.4183878434484559,"score_spread":0.37486077465320367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092570100","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008916632,0.0008184425,0.000048978767,0.00012441161,0.98356825,0.00034781528,0.000012604566,0.000025141773,0.0061377175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0073510087,0.00020229928,0.0026244295,0.000005576423,0.9842945,0.000034099732,0.00003761997,0.000089460395,0.005361004],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913281,0.0016156771,0.0016753752,0.0006631718,0.0034918734,0.0012257973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906916,0.006147563,0.0008527246,0.0003720922,0.0015844858,0.0003515229],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025223559,0.00043129837,0.0010476632,0.0027015072,0.00029670083,0.00038724262,0.00043974858,0.0012452195,0.00002670612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002942886,0.00038106646,0.0001237385,0.00083770044,0.00023286343,0.00030776722,0.0002497217,0.0057777897,0.000048961392],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028872423,0.00014642507,0.002239727,0.00030761803,0.00011680083,0.0014010145,0.0031010895,0.0000038701583,0.00017871833,0.00006358251,0.98116434,0.010988122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010836752,0.00019648591,0.0012380523,0.0030682732,0.000018837522,0.00013633975,0.0004051178,0.0000047263266,0.00011151643,0.00022848274,0.99314004,0.00036844253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005347333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056009543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022280673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014630042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017923837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104706843","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.01383.x","title":"A randomised efficacy study of Web‐based synthetic and analytic programmes among disadvantaged urban Kindergarten children","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Phonics; Psychology; Disadvantaged; Literacy; Reading (process); Phonological awareness; Phonology; Psychological intervention; Phonemic awareness; Articulation (sociology); Developmental psychology; Intervention (counseling); Emergent literacy; Primary education; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03953941300469507,"score_gpt":0.40870569323595757,"score_spread":0.3691662802312625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104706843","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99746,0.0003213308,0.000027851509,0.00028272055,0.00007978916,0.00087249617,8.7934376e-7,0.000011562233,0.00094335224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993267,0.000023008051,0.00034367404,0.000011670069,0.00007744818,0.000015244895,0.0000011567179,0.000016436705,0.00018467868],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99633104,0.0011409813,0.00091942895,0.0002841023,0.00079158397,0.00053285673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975511,0.0013513537,0.00037425285,0.00029169844,0.00020496041,0.0002266696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005641379,0.00016456174,0.0006012542,0.0015255323,0.00010802657,0.00009811813,0.00033086646,0.00008040496,0.00003698001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064369466,0.00012480187,0.000108887565,0.0008342692,0.00015147323,0.00014535127,0.0000317148,0.0008244763,0.0000022523168],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004042173,0.0027736991,0.9430783,0.000032278793,0.0002953999,0.00047365436,0.012803217,0.00007090168,0.0005023224,0.000052713513,0.0003686971,0.035506643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.030653799,0.0022235515,0.96161354,0.00079893053,0.000056405403,0.00010472279,0.0036915743,0.00041720594,0.00011543422,0.00010009763,0.000066692905,0.00015802697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007346095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009984339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035348617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010797889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011190505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5089272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105473918","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01415.x","title":"Task-focused behaviour and literacy development: a reciprocal relationship","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Spelling; Fluency; Psychology; Reading comprehension; Task (project management); Literacy; Comprehension; Reading (process); Reciprocal teaching; Reciprocal; Developmental psychology; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics education; Linguistics; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.11485599251412708,"score_gpt":0.4540366273383749,"score_spread":0.3391806348242478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105473918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98961055,0.00087121513,0.00025256496,0.0015126806,0.000233275,0.00014708765,6.2260744e-7,0.000012972098,0.0073590395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98271537,0.000038039794,0.014717201,0.00006322134,0.0001505362,0.000006089087,0.0000018987344,0.000012874533,0.0022947816],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973656,0.0004689213,0.0007898046,0.00022823947,0.0006249936,0.0005224593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982352,0.0008389207,0.00020160909,0.00016799258,0.00031584525,0.00024039454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056463545,0.00012356367,0.00025969007,0.0014538975,0.00018413841,0.00016540641,0.00024158815,0.00012867506,0.00005997744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053179055,0.000105375155,0.000044336048,0.00077421765,0.00006352915,0.00038454245,0.000037232134,0.0012132893,0.000040872823],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047015387,0.00033406634,0.62825185,0.000031884592,0.00004320808,0.0013160275,0.051542144,0.0000039904166,0.00034006563,0.004317635,0.0028031305,0.31054583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012701779,0.00032104988,0.9786103,0.00091080245,0.0000056672093,0.00061752775,0.00096523337,0.000018563891,0.00016211893,0.0033449102,0.0136145875,0.00015908807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001622808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001805002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3503584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026453944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019913285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5271206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105551392","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01496.x","title":"Sounds, letters and meanings: the independent influences of phonological, morphological and orthographic skills on early word reading accuracy","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Army Research Office; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Pseudoword; Reading (process); Psychology; Phonological awareness; Vocabulary; Phonemic awareness; Orthographic projection; Cognitive psychology; Rapid automatized naming; Phonology; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.0763644872299729,"score_gpt":0.40523007123774807,"score_spread":0.32886558400777516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105551392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962959,0.0011456825,0.000016985532,0.0010302811,0.00026592205,0.00017840216,0.0000012092528,0.000007906804,0.0010576951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981696,0.0006760051,0.0007254396,0.00016461835,0.00015765593,0.000012587906,3.8328335e-7,0.0000120590885,0.00008162189],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99673426,0.00089099986,0.000706244,0.0002379935,0.0007495197,0.0006809827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954222,0.003595566,0.00040995903,0.00021185582,0.00014223426,0.00021821244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008271219,0.00016320217,0.00037781653,0.0009795052,0.00020066301,0.00013692367,0.00037486956,0.00014829845,0.00005351037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012411283,0.00009513066,0.000071998766,0.0006861672,0.0005524847,0.00035926802,0.00014982118,0.001426592,0.000007275926],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030958524,0.00018398395,0.95721376,0.00002741404,0.00012157996,0.00023871141,0.015704181,0.000008344976,0.0061908546,0.0018647711,0.0004199199,0.017716922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063983956,0.00038511152,0.9911823,0.0005910967,0.00001249614,0.00070042856,0.0036539994,0.000002772494,0.0003213708,0.0008313564,0.0015500752,0.00012910571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012731769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000022957695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033968616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000086110515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000036935457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61979115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113838907","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01430.x","title":"Written narrations by 8‐ to 10‐year‐old Turkish pupils in Flemish primary education: A follow‐up of seven text features","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Writing and Handwriting Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Turkish; Psychology; Flemish; Mathematics education; Primary education; Developmental psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04479022201632967,"score_gpt":0.4248097479535658,"score_spread":0.38001952593723615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113838907","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93594015,0.00019104067,0.0000034313339,0.018150004,0.00056845084,0.00021654724,0.0000041654357,0.0000074603245,0.04491877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803044,0.00008165448,0.0021395755,0.0001085967,0.0009344284,0.000017886048,0.000004466219,0.000010560975,0.016398417],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771297,0.00041342794,0.00044808132,0.0001506665,0.0008910296,0.00038383208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979221,0.0007420931,0.0001706649,0.00014723901,0.0007941426,0.00022371674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077672433,0.00006912319,0.00020610134,0.0007715006,0.00025843203,0.00018944827,0.00042255927,0.00017450584,0.00014640989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004472316,0.00006956118,0.000059475788,0.0011674818,0.00014134435,0.0003539875,0.000040534283,0.0012872958,0.000008197428],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000225686,0.0010287585,0.11971537,0.00019862367,0.000036326182,0.000020535246,0.119373366,0.000019102905,0.082661286,0.008436918,0.60370064,0.06458341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034925118,0.00076829497,0.20621997,0.006487019,0.000031727657,0.00012123776,0.42656526,0.000016891032,0.008668467,0.01815074,0.3286268,0.00085106364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020602033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029053597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30719188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029876025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018296723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5592731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122733925","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.00373.x","title":"Comparing the contribution of two tests of working memory to reading in relation to phonological awareness and rapid naming speed","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Working memory; Sentence; Psychology; Reading (process); Cognitive psychology; Phonological awareness; Reading comprehension; Comprehension; Memory span; Short-term memory; Task (project management); Linguistics; Cognition","score_opus":0.20605471147314938,"score_gpt":0.4454655693965911,"score_spread":0.23941085792344172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122733925","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968003,0.00035516737,0.00042409357,0.0005384718,0.00022678141,0.00027124165,4.0074445e-7,0.0000048720126,0.0013786401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980922,0.00006504327,0.001652146,0.000019522062,0.000091840775,0.0000059113463,9.687636e-7,0.000009880595,0.000062541636],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971799,0.00071475573,0.00093562936,0.00020143963,0.0005410031,0.000427276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713147,0.0019430136,0.00031180365,0.00017233178,0.00031873814,0.00012263087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007968612,0.00010468402,0.00045042348,0.0013718808,0.0001394927,0.000026021402,0.00026664376,0.000084593165,0.000011378041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014689441,0.000079029116,0.000045515266,0.0012532903,0.00011363692,0.00013437658,0.000119961674,0.0007317452,0.0000032329697],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054931105,0.00008650213,0.94552237,0.000021799791,0.000031879383,0.00015396085,0.017564699,0.0016321841,0.024728054,0.00080023945,0.00007526086,0.008833715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014050151,0.00025928905,0.9867051,0.0021630235,0.0000049844107,0.00030312774,0.002578606,0.00062276353,0.005319559,0.00032569203,0.00020957817,0.0001032201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034268876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003879456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041182745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031847035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000099907644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3222714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145888106","doi":"10.1111/jrir.12003","title":"Growth and predictors of change in English language learners' reading comprehension","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":172,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Baycrest Hospital; University of Toronto; Employment and Social Development Canada","funders":"Ministère de l’Éducation, Gouvernement de l’Ontario","keywords":"Reading comprehension; Linguistics; Vocabulary; Reading (process); Psychology; Comprehension; Syntax; Cognition; Phonological awareness; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.08813114869226729,"score_gpt":0.40524144646844407,"score_spread":0.3171102977761768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145888106","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923305,0.0008327761,0.000004627699,0.00027827013,0.00040690263,0.0002326737,0.0000010095753,0.000008484983,0.0059047504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99848217,0.00029169826,0.0006237524,0.000022558916,0.0002805706,0.000017159375,0.0000012840337,0.000016549213,0.00026427844],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977297,0.0005226035,0.00061241677,0.00018177228,0.0005055761,0.00044789407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840933,0.00084147847,0.00020146009,0.00014558934,0.00024783277,0.00015432789],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029273198,0.00010456074,0.00033746968,0.001620044,0.000038556846,0.000049800095,0.00021459605,0.000112516245,0.00010593318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056534115,0.000086591564,0.00004211062,0.0006586456,0.00010814592,0.00038181,0.00008968613,0.00087773486,0.000009038488],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012961464,0.00013366202,0.8315388,0.00016220313,0.000042197145,0.00031289246,0.14345191,0.0000028611357,0.007282362,0.0006526708,0.000800145,0.015490698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002375925,0.0005947617,0.937515,0.003360286,0.000007893557,0.00016835621,0.052174967,0.00018151339,0.0019998872,0.0004536501,0.00094925024,0.00021848286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016305983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001272369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.105976254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011290707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003905352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.381337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146015248","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01476.x","title":"Rapid naming speed components and reading comprehension in bilingual children","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Reading comprehension; Articulation (sociology); Linguistics; Comprehension; Reading (process)","score_opus":0.18623849610635473,"score_gpt":0.42229138940453326,"score_spread":0.23605289329817852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146015248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99057883,0.0008180269,0.000015461463,0.00010936229,0.00040482546,0.00019265636,9.786316e-7,0.000009783737,0.007870081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962461,0.00024493673,0.0030520237,0.000024141855,0.00014256427,0.0000017230653,0.0000022170673,0.000023277738,0.00026301437],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969513,0.00071653875,0.00083588006,0.0002871005,0.000572764,0.0006364636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855983,0.00063845486,0.00023109098,0.00019927732,0.00016949218,0.00020184863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057150433,0.00014944698,0.00040382872,0.0021155053,0.000106459214,0.000060647322,0.00030532776,0.00012318334,0.00011250181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025190957,0.00012946175,0.00005446648,0.00067627226,0.00013317374,0.00024427706,0.0001315151,0.0012214383,0.000022577486],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075743854,0.000364596,0.89416534,0.000051720952,0.00009265014,0.0015078966,0.033945177,0.000007900084,0.010060103,0.0007785983,0.00030487523,0.05796369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021063327,0.00031832518,0.98931813,0.0017509586,0.0000057941324,0.0010196851,0.0027049247,0.00019706976,0.0009995713,0.00067048776,0.00072489673,0.00018379393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067436136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000102500635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0951528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002192086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008202868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5306609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147003560","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01436.x","title":"Reader and text factors in reading comprehension processes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Comprehension; Psychology; Reading comprehension; Reading (process); Conceptual change; Think aloud protocol; Cognition; Function (biology); Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Mathematics education; Philosophy","score_opus":0.20181377219513943,"score_gpt":0.48787307347043163,"score_spread":0.2860593012752922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147003560","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877391,0.0005095934,0.000003868996,0.0015660198,0.00047977883,0.000093354436,6.775766e-7,0.0000054581187,0.009602157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984892,0.00026173927,0.0005614907,0.000015514857,0.0001946314,0.000004576255,9.18791e-7,0.000010495883,0.0004614158],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985019,0.0001982084,0.00040161886,0.00016489245,0.00034544352,0.00038796218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99749607,0.0018523548,0.0001374639,0.00012497517,0.00028235454,0.000106800726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021875717,0.00008896031,0.00022101216,0.00074878114,0.00009237173,0.00008502313,0.00021760349,0.00013199367,0.00014502073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00096145214,0.000067484856,0.000025170664,0.00058567437,0.00019479233,0.00024985385,0.000053193562,0.0013279397,0.00000956878],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010653742,0.00012864861,0.97805953,0.00013585074,0.0000159869,0.00017025655,0.0052112876,0.000009141738,0.008002273,0.004921926,0.0014171684,0.0018213677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004672976,0.00021023254,0.95603156,0.00049716834,0.0000027414467,0.00027535344,0.03275923,0.000009777527,0.0006645305,0.0050277384,0.0039440678,0.00011030693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006313516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021694359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027547944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072665905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017531592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5769311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148150170","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9817.2007.00335.x","title":"Correlates of orthographic learning in third‐grade children's silent reading","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council; Leading Edge Endowment Fund","keywords":"Homophone; Psychology; Orthographic projection; Reading (process); Spelling; Orthography; Phonology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Word recognition; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.05112342242325965,"score_gpt":0.41378817236916804,"score_spread":0.36266474994590836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148150170","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896606,0.0011342865,0.000119898636,0.00020345936,0.00045909555,0.00019092025,6.832522e-7,0.000014012294,0.008217039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99758023,0.00037908292,0.0011110133,0.000012683243,0.00016048434,0.0000028978347,0.0000023892023,0.00002817898,0.0007230371],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956527,0.0007420734,0.001416155,0.00027872474,0.0009812058,0.000929164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99675703,0.002008334,0.0005246118,0.000218196,0.000280249,0.00021160452],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01856402,0.00016965486,0.0005024515,0.0044680974,0.00010452262,0.000048607453,0.00043089292,0.00020277328,0.00006802429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008242855,0.00014871208,0.00015153218,0.0022890707,0.00016577002,0.00022477661,0.000083285224,0.0027387128,0.000015162531],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000283876,0.00022369935,0.9736359,0.00003821705,0.0000803597,0.00072210346,0.00893638,0.00030391043,0.0010346769,0.001680506,0.0002468416,0.012813528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013013012,0.0004254108,0.98873746,0.0020996323,0.000008048713,0.00049347064,0.0044160946,0.000062729356,0.00061392353,0.0007711875,0.00090095005,0.00016978485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041021215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028241811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017739734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025717184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012875134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151775760","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01487.x","title":"What we have learned from ‘learning to read in more than one language’","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Reading (process); Diversity (politics); Point (geometry); Linguistics; Language acquisition; Learning to read; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics education; Sociology","score_opus":0.24173954806348052,"score_gpt":0.47133301263846883,"score_spread":0.2295934645749883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151775760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9836936,0.0014537771,0.00005085471,0.003055569,0.0005331364,0.00016574151,9.813389e-7,0.000013195042,0.011033163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884374,0.0006606947,0.0037545154,0.00007329622,0.0002713041,0.000015823294,0.000002702393,0.000033296266,0.006750964],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967137,0.00087638694,0.00066984637,0.0003064915,0.000740612,0.0006929936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983623,0.000718767,0.00018815316,0.00027542244,0.00018248579,0.00027285513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005174291,0.00013908652,0.00038389195,0.001779255,0.000069775175,0.00015335377,0.0004761328,0.00014211895,0.0008315468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006522618,0.00012434772,0.00007217684,0.0007293741,0.00008312559,0.00045899337,0.00012734914,0.0018430355,0.00019785223],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001214868,0.00036416136,0.2373638,0.000034253375,0.00011790569,0.003937576,0.5162066,0.00004512965,0.0028332705,0.0003248584,0.0008666943,0.23669088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028982055,0.0010317997,0.43774712,0.009330239,0.000014168284,0.00020744454,0.52751994,0.000117510775,0.003232628,0.0046614716,0.012747007,0.00049249444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042873453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003131505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23619838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003296385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009612592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9104854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152297474","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00323.x","title":"Rhythm and reading development in school‐age children: a longitudinal study","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhythm; Psychology; Phonological awareness; Reading (process); Developmental psychology; Multilevel model; Variance (accounting); Analysis of variance; Longitudinal study; Cognitive psychology; Audiology; Linguistics; Statistics; Mathematics; Literacy; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.08401992344932291,"score_gpt":0.42792740439253807,"score_spread":0.34390748094321516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152297474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919783,0.0007576574,0.000052119678,0.00019077375,0.00023708314,0.00038265172,5.933815e-7,0.000011144803,0.0063897027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943941,0.000040781735,0.0037208567,0.000013127519,0.00029250162,0.000029143162,0.0000019127983,0.00002583823,0.0014817],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99610233,0.0006469399,0.001160401,0.00039034014,0.00088974234,0.0008102727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866384,0.0004911665,0.00022443745,0.00022137856,0.00018494118,0.00021421017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008856215,0.00019324038,0.00046379038,0.002487691,0.00016283082,0.00020226392,0.000293661,0.000104705614,0.00008889618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028013415,0.00016949391,0.000046208308,0.0011232065,0.00009141211,0.00029565717,0.000137761,0.0014093297,0.000037434053],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019637091,0.0005392829,0.9788444,0.000021232538,0.00006275315,0.004396801,0.0047677374,0.00001858394,0.000106401734,0.00048451324,0.00075441424,0.009807528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019996935,0.0002636762,0.9917145,0.0007231339,0.0000047036315,0.0011183769,0.0021526618,0.000006709937,0.00007235844,0.0004911625,0.0012792223,0.00017383308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009254308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021756168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012870086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000622705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022106424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6911761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153845225","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9817.2012.01542.x","title":"Reading comprehension in university students: relevance of PASS theory of intelligence","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Fluency; Reading comprehension; Psychology; Reading (process); Comprehension; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Relevance (law); Linguistics; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.11712097484763136,"score_gpt":0.4492016235851022,"score_spread":0.33208064873747084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153845225","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936487,0.0006414213,0.000803274,0.000074609816,0.0003559413,0.000118294716,0.0000013379545,0.0000030767214,0.004353321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99693966,0.0004303408,0.0019149595,0.000005681206,0.00005491585,6.285206e-7,4.1770545e-7,0.000009657173,0.00064373016],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967127,0.0012359456,0.00071699265,0.00013500784,0.00074235175,0.00045701946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965793,0.0023704679,0.00038584773,0.00021485225,0.00032679088,0.00012276041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010512884,0.00008972607,0.0003622865,0.0013854398,0.00003890069,0.0000101160185,0.0005278951,0.00008962214,0.00006697509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056149065,0.00008055517,0.000065381086,0.0009977274,0.000161935,0.00031629833,0.0001464325,0.0007797214,0.000009558797],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012203876,0.0006717212,0.91047895,0.00015783348,0.00008197539,0.00030343595,0.025039958,0.000099825134,0.005315187,0.02101291,0.0002356339,0.0353822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016934769,0.00058281847,0.92471284,0.0067506237,0.000017556373,0.00023202902,0.04712757,0.00006374574,0.008817281,0.004583545,0.005160341,0.00025820328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000107594184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000035319968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035123996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033165282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007086418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36435765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154848195","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.00158","title":"Parents’ self‐efficacy beliefs, parents’ gender, children’s reader self‐perceptions, reading achievement and gender","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Educational Methods and Media Use","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Psychology; Reading (process); Developmental psychology; Perception; Test (biology); Literacy; Self-efficacy; Scale (ratio); Academic achievement; Social psychology","score_opus":0.18927391038352015,"score_gpt":0.4230462403256889,"score_spread":0.23377232994216873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154848195","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98604774,0.0022171568,0.0067988145,0.0029467596,0.0006955827,0.00041037993,0.0000028197414,0.000060537066,0.0008202008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7479744,0.006885306,0.24423222,0.00014472217,0.0006315153,0.00001998211,0.000001975452,0.000023241686,0.00008662218],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99555296,0.0009300757,0.0007626551,0.0004566809,0.0015054169,0.0007922392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973,0.0010208718,0.0002623364,0.00046662035,0.00040629905,0.00054386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058228737,0.00020855611,0.0003429634,0.0011789647,0.0003454843,0.0003154825,0.0009446622,0.00012026573,0.000040067447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058761175,0.00018035472,0.0001035749,0.0009499118,0.00008466295,0.0008804386,0.00032977414,0.0011731816,0.000028584967],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032328488,0.0039286017,0.8075518,0.00023948857,0.00041885447,0.00024385612,0.078510106,0.00011301505,0.0017931258,0.011232552,0.0071193534,0.088816896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029726836,0.0005674743,0.97206223,0.0007587128,0.000049778453,0.0010802562,0.005513064,0.0042868783,0.00046075459,0.0061138174,0.0055097234,0.00062463776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003040914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001826835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23807333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049314153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018859399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7354652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159059011","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01439.x","title":"The development of reading interest and its relation to reading ability","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Psychology; Reading rate; Relation (database); Multilevel model; Developmental psychology; Linguistics; Reading comprehension; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1354010105360531,"score_gpt":0.4638353636837346,"score_spread":0.32843435314768155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159059011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912442,0.00014142373,0.00016088215,0.001061958,0.00084995845,0.00025190235,7.8727777e-7,0.000007751441,0.0062811277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99144566,0.00003218802,0.007519133,0.0000125628485,0.000154362,0.00001593557,6.5564024e-7,0.00001823438,0.00080124184],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99694353,0.00044517638,0.0011947377,0.00025948428,0.0006130297,0.000544048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99619544,0.0023597793,0.00034851494,0.00027951298,0.0005625797,0.00025416428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016972834,0.00013357622,0.00029963124,0.0009345004,0.00032214978,0.00011393749,0.000435851,0.00013205489,0.000045568726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025491382,0.00009521374,0.000051320167,0.00072002277,0.00011074646,0.0002442159,0.00016489983,0.0014871331,0.000026255759],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013168989,0.0003131263,0.23549819,0.0002522174,0.00025193405,0.00015910999,0.10370372,0.000020799387,0.27292264,0.039316107,0.0016416423,0.34460363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015243387,0.0005189893,0.89773726,0.0028552678,0.000015917143,0.00047070134,0.011331381,0.0002386869,0.028822377,0.0044926745,0.05155813,0.0004342713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002759049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006245109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6622391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024832322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021914858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64609355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161243018","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9817.2011.01506.x","title":"Taken out of context: differential processing in contextual and isolated word reading","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Reading (process); Task (project management); Context (archaeology); Cognitive psychology; Word (group theory); Cognition; Recall; Surprise; Linguistics; Communication","score_opus":0.14519473024836452,"score_gpt":0.4232596080484583,"score_spread":0.2780648778000938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161243018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9890783,0.0011561111,0.00036061584,0.0001300579,0.00043196284,0.00016192092,0.0000014834044,0.0000065151107,0.008673038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99777335,0.000078922836,0.00090417976,0.000014478079,0.000096348056,0.0000047831277,7.7039135e-7,0.00001991735,0.0011072335],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973413,0.0005193205,0.0009577999,0.00021514186,0.00042865385,0.00053778745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863917,0.00041203512,0.00034550813,0.00013369233,0.0003118345,0.00015776232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003377529,0.00013430693,0.0004654609,0.0013285505,0.0000620592,0.00005151025,0.00026450757,0.00014101269,0.00017373005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035028133,0.000113734226,0.000052822186,0.00048264055,0.00021764718,0.00029727272,0.00007405236,0.0010018414,0.000007273035],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023364713,0.00049167825,0.4730302,0.0002298557,0.00010294036,0.0011455378,0.15367699,0.0000020684154,0.0083759995,0.0026261997,0.00054652296,0.35743552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009179284,0.0015912075,0.90897596,0.012794103,0.00003870833,0.000908852,0.05365444,0.0012819582,0.0027253015,0.003737813,0.0044682235,0.0006441791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038755842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000537397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43594572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016583162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012743773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4637947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168805826","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12056","title":"The relationship of morphological analysis and morphological decoding to reading comprehension","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Morpheme; Reading comprehension; Psychology; Reading (process); Linguistics; Comprehension; Phonological awareness; Cognitive psychology; Morphological analysis","score_opus":0.28652381869922866,"score_gpt":0.4863545732860768,"score_spread":0.19983075458684812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168805826","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99330735,0.0004718032,0.001282919,0.0014699709,0.00023143987,0.0001383583,0.0000011041697,0.000007202922,0.0030898252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911922,0.00006287906,0.008155057,0.000035828194,0.00008409279,0.000007450386,0.0000011239565,0.000008652091,0.00045270298],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99646044,0.0011981953,0.000862386,0.00023717056,0.0007712369,0.00047055213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99315745,0.0054616723,0.00027210213,0.00025531484,0.0005069245,0.00034652368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013125923,0.00011120358,0.00042050352,0.0015177875,0.00019742915,0.00009217181,0.00036097597,0.00013084187,0.0000298917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037726632,0.00006906812,0.00010266829,0.0021481502,0.00020223469,0.0001196101,0.00016686597,0.00090269465,0.000017336091],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062832003,0.00009501122,0.9733973,0.000010954053,0.00018616642,0.0012059401,0.0048786495,0.00033202348,0.0018849162,0.0044059614,0.0022459687,0.0107288025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010332024,0.00072227995,0.9797677,0.00038342268,0.00006317028,0.0014282117,0.0071672574,0.000532266,0.000265897,0.005418368,0.0030505925,0.00016767214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009972851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008852274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010561131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021113748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000071726645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45492095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170101179","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01475.x","title":"The role of phoneme and onset‐rime awareness in second language reading acquisition","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Hard rime; Phonological awareness; Psychology; Reading (process); Linguistics; Psycholinguistics; Rhyme; Phonemic awareness; French immersion; Learning to read; Phonology; Language acquisition; Developmental psychology; Cognition; Mathematics education; Poetry","score_opus":0.06262012327434248,"score_gpt":0.40905931007140117,"score_spread":0.3464391867970587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170101179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9805755,0.0019978937,0.000011005779,0.0000745285,0.00019204697,0.00010415699,0.0000026792275,0.0000035822907,0.017038621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985504,0.00014887196,0.0004665791,0.000011067502,0.00006816618,0.000008050756,9.4577285e-7,0.000012725066,0.0007331604],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979447,0.0005485577,0.0005859274,0.00014847303,0.00036609624,0.00040623784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984753,0.0008694393,0.00022040794,0.00018779995,0.00015319984,0.00009381151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062944526,0.000087243396,0.00023639742,0.00082316017,0.00009900207,0.00004334766,0.00027075672,0.00008290608,0.00021306601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001853074,0.000063007545,0.00004000949,0.00047205103,0.00012695328,0.00017826696,0.00006828656,0.00062057487,0.000009115745],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011186587,0.00025566824,0.7420612,0.00009557768,0.000108594766,0.00085545465,0.16293398,0.0000025514219,0.021205999,0.0039445856,0.0005548688,0.066862874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018992878,0.00046378357,0.8705118,0.0018612689,0.000009325709,0.0007470527,0.07470856,0.00010655212,0.036596388,0.009132456,0.0037318827,0.00023166066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066356774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008317457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12845059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013032233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001024826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26961234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172203360","doi":"10.1111/jrir.12005","title":"The predictive relations between non‐alphanumeric rapid naming and growth in regular and irregular word decoding in at‐risk readers","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canadian Psychological Association; University of Manitoba","keywords":"Alphanumeric; Decoding methods; Psychology; Word (group theory); Reading (process); Phonology; Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Natural language processing; Speech recognition; Computer science","score_opus":0.04141064136863804,"score_gpt":0.3619917654731853,"score_spread":0.32058112410454725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172203360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99378407,0.0023964501,0.00021591128,0.0015498782,0.00013012002,0.00036249936,0.0000014579557,0.0000053048557,0.0015542955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958991,0.0013043394,0.0020136945,0.000009515766,0.000100238474,0.0000425923,0.0000012578058,0.000020408368,0.00060885295],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99680245,0.0010172526,0.00078863325,0.0002801123,0.00047425416,0.0006373077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996064,0.0031638634,0.00027903498,0.00017204086,0.00014013544,0.00018092018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0081626875,0.00013944949,0.00032432488,0.0014423518,0.00030629622,0.00014818863,0.00023713779,0.0001346809,0.000026899896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008432452,0.00010638413,0.000038631886,0.0010101162,0.00025069577,0.00043256444,0.00013303131,0.0013362657,0.000008596498],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010220355,0.000025756372,0.92215294,0.000022486165,0.000058801157,0.00010380271,0.016902119,0.000018263936,0.00013636863,0.0001415904,0.00052869134,0.059806958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011395685,0.00014642057,0.98242164,0.0009719601,0.000008067648,0.00009129681,0.009396386,0.00083100854,0.00007536434,0.0043195174,0.00048120777,0.000117539304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074857945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000051902236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060268704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004944404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000076958364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5805484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2202614262","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12065","title":"Word reading aloud skills: their positive redefinition through ageing","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université de Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Pseudoword; Pronunciation; Orthography; Psychology; Phonology; Reading (process); Linguistics; Word lists by frequency; Word (group theory); Healthy ageing; Word recognition; Semantics (computer science); Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Natural language processing; Ageing","score_opus":0.16084747472799965,"score_gpt":0.4508130803314879,"score_spread":0.2899656056034883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2202614262","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81580424,0.0010179552,0.00068685267,0.0016842744,0.0015406123,0.00024399145,0.0000055669525,0.000030615316,0.17898586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99070925,0.00020194257,0.00625322,0.00012543662,0.00067508605,0.000011119933,0.0000068406907,0.00003953961,0.0019775901],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99580073,0.0011848066,0.0008965331,0.0003125811,0.0009701095,0.00083526375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968273,0.0015469707,0.00036896652,0.00029164608,0.0006646195,0.00030047706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009460175,0.00019292122,0.0004363384,0.0011230403,0.00017428219,0.00018745752,0.00043861603,0.00017134957,0.000086659515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011213123,0.00015653326,0.00012184181,0.0011611882,0.00014086015,0.00052257074,0.00011057111,0.0015332852,0.00012809211],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002767907,0.0017058428,0.049766205,0.00017899244,0.0009121659,0.019884882,0.55203927,0.0002766162,0.004998649,0.048800133,0.07153979,0.24712956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017472126,0.0049681324,0.13890347,0.028805146,0.00011048828,0.01272137,0.301274,0.00044691184,0.016310982,0.24644229,0.22992773,0.0026173533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026400777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006878383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25076526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083049404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026398114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66614467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461562727","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12077","title":"Double dissociations in reading comprehension difficulties among Chinese–English bilinguals and their association with tone awareness","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Killam Trusts; Dalhousie University","keywords":"Psychology; Metalinguistics; Reading comprehension; Phonological awareness; Linguistics; Mandarin Chinese; Vocabulary; Lexical decision task; Cognitive psychology; Reading (process); Cognition; Vocabulary development; Literacy","score_opus":0.049031990236807134,"score_gpt":0.41109429752702775,"score_spread":0.3620623072902206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461562727","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971533,0.00021948504,0.00007251262,0.0006725602,0.00035316308,0.00020695613,0.000004420813,0.000017104801,0.0013004941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99759686,0.00018626025,0.000273574,0.000008251546,0.00023344133,0.000019519366,0.000002680985,0.000021728209,0.0016577101],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973616,0.000563401,0.0006642348,0.00025882552,0.0006015183,0.00055044604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995747,0.0028749092,0.00041770964,0.00016599623,0.0006605554,0.00013382696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005402741,0.00015960216,0.0004333605,0.001108896,0.00017507929,0.00013166935,0.00019695878,0.00015247146,0.000025745763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095861236,0.0000876085,0.000049868904,0.0008802431,0.000096863936,0.0004704467,0.00006945927,0.00063233374,0.0000036492404],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027084624,0.00012199077,0.9636617,0.000024777733,0.000068980815,0.0000650855,0.029166594,0.000031553383,0.0032585396,0.00020240163,0.00021100404,0.0029165645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028997865,0.00015579004,0.9846732,0.002091488,0.000005238355,0.00003078422,0.008176078,0.00003616816,0.00091324665,0.00044714304,0.00041008103,0.00016097318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004414411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025279558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021011561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008414949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011847273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35725713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513723401","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12084","title":"Language profiles of poor comprehenders in English and French","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Reading comprehension; Vocabulary; Linguistics; Comprehension; Grammar; Inference; Neuroscience of multilingualism; Vocabulary development; Reading (process); Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.0699956197499816,"score_gpt":0.4206857233548647,"score_spread":0.3506901036048831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513723401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902638,0.0007695563,0.000025434918,0.0004542529,0.00020721034,0.00009322171,0.0000024850804,0.000003802819,0.008180217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976707,0.00010703677,0.0009847144,0.000009156561,0.00009999019,0.000004891361,2.7328696e-7,0.000008095892,0.0011151037],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983825,0.00036174123,0.00045457945,0.0001233717,0.00036465397,0.00031316982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853194,0.00095748284,0.0001325568,0.00010874852,0.00018224388,0.00008705984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00318223,0.00006408847,0.00022356752,0.0010200758,0.000019575733,0.000018596234,0.00017958997,0.00006335297,0.000118820455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050077535,0.00004134707,0.000028891516,0.00034339706,0.000114910574,0.00013877092,0.00004742342,0.0003734018,0.0000045892702],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024744647,0.00021235857,0.81036395,0.00013634238,0.00006874457,0.00072239054,0.06694442,0.0000020331845,0.020559097,0.0018149415,0.004714289,0.094213985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005269644,0.00066009705,0.9361826,0.005270511,0.000006071234,0.00022608106,0.032005608,0.000021493292,0.009098417,0.0019358019,0.009075857,0.00024782136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021802545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001889784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12581864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010810611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000070659626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16860846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516977343","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12083","title":"Explaining phonology and reading in adult learners: Introducing prosodic awareness and executive functions to reading ability","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Phonological awareness; Phonology; Psychology; Reading (process); Stress (linguistics); Intonation (linguistics); Cognitive psychology; Phonemic awareness; Vocabulary; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06725277743385415,"score_gpt":0.4135371571754678,"score_spread":0.34628437974161363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2516977343","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926236,0.00021546081,0.0010204322,0.0031947494,0.00055559096,0.00032351786,0.0000034260595,0.000018770166,0.002044444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99636734,0.00022750504,0.0020796172,0.00004635426,0.00026059282,0.00006022561,9.458827e-7,0.00002906268,0.00092837476],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960549,0.0010033516,0.0009672429,0.00058959407,0.00044479567,0.00094010384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99608004,0.0026117468,0.00024610574,0.0003126671,0.00041405237,0.00033538567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008646668,0.00021291507,0.00055015116,0.0025319478,0.00025946976,0.00012194569,0.00025645626,0.00018313651,0.000047553265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037683202,0.00016033916,0.00004622181,0.0010976435,0.00026677657,0.00054245314,0.00020630316,0.0010692272,0.00002388444],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008618408,0.00011564056,0.79941577,0.000095030606,0.00006827386,0.0003771071,0.052239906,0.000026075013,0.02210151,0.0016710449,0.0008056931,0.12222211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010035574,0.0034628038,0.75958705,0.01903222,0.0000470453,0.0036055362,0.18379518,0.00028218492,0.005587904,0.0053365347,0.007834067,0.0013938972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005823034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007762438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13155527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072417466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020367457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6538441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550182109","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12091","title":"Direct and indirect effects of executive function on reading comprehension in young adults","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Killam Trusts; University of Alberta","keywords":"Psychology; Reading comprehension; Fluency; Reading (process); Stroop effect; Vocabulary; Working memory; Cognitive psychology; Comprehension; Test (biology); Cognition; Developmental psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.041621355871281226,"score_gpt":0.37774538034800537,"score_spread":0.3361240244767241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2550182109","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.986695,0.00043366963,0.000047911308,0.00013681556,0.0006433287,0.00022559254,0.0000010798868,0.000007261323,0.011809362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99864364,0.00035837738,0.0002066121,0.000010275898,0.00009550684,0.000011521535,4.548168e-7,0.0000167578,0.0006568418],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724805,0.0009047091,0.00059362745,0.00025490794,0.0005691229,0.00042958412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99580175,0.003446647,0.00026539888,0.00016070025,0.00020581207,0.000119678065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003643428,0.0001280408,0.0004091405,0.0019492109,0.000056216937,0.00002361156,0.00014381959,0.000117641874,0.00001684519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007876942,0.00008525302,0.000052667758,0.00063356536,0.00009834944,0.000204223,0.00005320088,0.0005192317,0.000010598829],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0074353535,0.0005055262,0.6412566,0.00041901984,0.00018499815,0.0011441531,0.020972196,0.000009218047,0.09628154,0.0011984332,0.0015453234,0.22904769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004770028,0.0020854163,0.9370619,0.019923858,0.000011683241,0.00018941716,0.0015700149,0.000022764174,0.032593947,0.00069638854,0.00087642315,0.00019815285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018998099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021622636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29580536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031813796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005073675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34765172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2577244949","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12097","title":"The effects of age and sublexical automaticity on reading outcomes for students with reading disabilities","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Fluency; Automaticity; Psychology; Reading (process); Spelling; Reading comprehension; Context (archaeology); Dyslexia; Developmental psychology; Phonological awareness; Cognitive psychology; Comprehension; Literacy; Linguistics; Cognition; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.09678141736753104,"score_gpt":0.5045646804567244,"score_spread":0.4077832630891934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2577244949","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99526215,0.00008928559,0.00008432733,0.00078095833,0.00046533957,0.0004848796,0.0000018378396,0.000007812423,0.002823418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99643666,0.000077236036,0.0012692473,0.000016675858,0.0001041072,0.00004747188,4.0600233e-7,0.000022419768,0.002025751],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971876,0.0004396332,0.0006406538,0.00022695921,0.00093065115,0.0005745128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870574,0.011627598,0.0004645484,0.00047168633,0.0002223177,0.00015644169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072467183,0.0001590996,0.00050434953,0.0003875266,0.000708966,0.00041936556,0.00075635355,0.00008786672,0.000004339024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005506384,0.00008991007,0.00008936746,0.000121112476,0.0005346631,0.00024109895,0.00013840983,0.00064281904,0.0000022042598],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010759521,0.00025571274,0.95214164,0.0005111749,0.00030970422,0.00031179423,0.012998895,0.000003212243,0.00041626315,0.016287219,0.0006334603,0.015054958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002773653,0.0017197505,0.9790353,0.0039388086,0.000027786265,0.00008021046,0.0050939745,0.000051123145,0.000982202,0.005327889,0.000801822,0.00016748073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000118407304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001865917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026893646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002020337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006571757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6592054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590909323","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12108","title":"Unexpected poor comprehenders: An investigation of multiple aspects of morphological awareness","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Comprehension; Reading comprehension; Cognitive psychology; Reading (process); Sample (material); Population; Developmental psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.2585933121953446,"score_gpt":0.477889988101577,"score_spread":0.21929667590623242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590909323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960432,0.00011823095,0.00010897081,0.0003664875,0.00030230093,0.00012672578,0.0000034376114,0.0000057703865,0.0029248656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99701923,0.000022578994,0.0027222256,0.000009087236,0.00010956872,0.0000049074015,0.0000033077665,0.000011669228,0.00009743739],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973635,0.0006987605,0.0007491456,0.0001897487,0.0006632544,0.00033555485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973148,0.00074063224,0.00073986873,0.0004096486,0.0006214774,0.00017355215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035098633,0.0000987341,0.0004001067,0.0007974185,0.000152006,0.0000611569,0.00067638484,0.00012705504,0.00007617589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094725395,0.00007940677,0.00007122893,0.00027588705,0.00040543664,0.00034116767,0.00009179322,0.0006002072,0.0000046101386],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056797045,0.00031879952,0.8679182,0.000102864935,0.00009893933,0.00081900257,0.010426939,0.00007323943,0.11270428,0.0024966781,0.00037955274,0.004093523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019547543,0.00071515335,0.9568176,0.000977893,0.00000777459,0.00028261438,0.0048168707,0.0004479892,0.029175015,0.0045598852,0.00012299787,0.00012140761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007832022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003153404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08889943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011640523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020950563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32381138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591105527","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12104","title":"The relation between orthographic processing and spelling in grade 1 French immersion children","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Spelling; Linguistics; Orthographic projection; Psychology; French immersion; Reading (process); Vocabulary; Orthography; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.10128750968734465,"score_gpt":0.44357545962626654,"score_spread":0.34228794993892186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591105527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.994397,0.0016376853,0.00006567539,0.0012171179,0.0001485264,0.00012813436,3.6586107e-7,0.0000025515053,0.0024029398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99839234,0.0005510863,0.00056641176,0.0000035019864,0.00020231838,0.0000023783223,8.882861e-7,0.000010131851,0.00027094275],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815726,0.00034718667,0.0004896368,0.00016275601,0.00045373614,0.00038939307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865794,0.0005881373,0.0003527228,0.00020554055,0.00010539449,0.0000902404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077695986,0.000078738994,0.000176697,0.00079918397,0.000606344,0.00033726657,0.0003605631,0.00008929413,0.0000058940677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028108407,0.000054260312,0.000036163565,0.00031658876,0.00016552983,0.00034753027,0.00006979016,0.0011115229,0.0000049287432],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002574641,0.00001869706,0.9235937,0.000010577854,0.00001689524,0.00004874946,0.0023488621,0.0000048064508,0.00009522497,0.00015399573,0.00006881608,0.07361392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005046769,0.000059082187,0.99579895,0.0007587328,0.000003780544,0.0000645788,0.0005916309,0.000071851595,0.000043932116,0.0016178767,0.00042451464,0.00006042639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002924548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025195639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073553495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008089103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000061650215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48290756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593776707","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12109","title":"Can earlier literacy skills have a negative impact on future home literacy activities? Evidence from Japanese","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science","keywords":"Psychology; Fluency; Literacy; Reading (process); Spelling; Developmental psychology; Early literacy; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06607269799610772,"score_gpt":0.4775800580471029,"score_spread":0.4115073600509952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593776707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911135,0.00064394757,0.0000072190637,0.0030208973,0.0014133065,0.00027438096,0.000041763094,0.0000117454465,0.0034732844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99082345,0.00039986157,0.0011266848,0.000093928815,0.0020658558,0.000024785437,0.0000041225576,0.000046034627,0.005415285],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951246,0.0011973367,0.00082406943,0.0004984042,0.001340099,0.0010155403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99232256,0.0046498077,0.000853718,0.0010299158,0.0006540818,0.00048989867],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004383718,0.00033343313,0.00068369927,0.0014103727,0.0005343813,0.0014628043,0.0012979092,0.00022790938,0.0006310984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017081486,0.00023938101,0.00027140795,0.00033372364,0.0002461728,0.0020044122,0.00020161693,0.0026126003,0.00009248498],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0039342428,0.00075490354,0.39217824,0.000082579885,0.00062780734,0.0063476,0.42097592,0.000036633155,0.0026362222,0.00012970564,0.006676221,0.16561994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019651374,0.0010770549,0.9739194,0.008553766,0.00001761118,0.0003144491,0.007713138,0.00009038516,0.0010738752,0.0022999474,0.0025656782,0.0004095666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032957413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003636037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58174115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009894534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003541631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605733652","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12112","title":"Understanding poor comprehenders in different orthographies: Universal versus language‐specific skills","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Reading comprehension; Psychology; Comprehension; Linguistics; Reading (process); Cognition; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.27272304144099807,"score_gpt":0.46133215473890643,"score_spread":0.18860911329790836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605733652","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9703381,0.00038360507,0.00023944197,0.0010182052,0.0015995037,0.00015502941,0.000002373867,0.000009874556,0.026253833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99826694,0.00037390314,0.00037134235,0.000009088032,0.00022204233,0.0000036454142,0.0000015500214,0.000021044021,0.0007304368],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973313,0.0004627284,0.00054001965,0.00025378508,0.0007231397,0.0006889992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978398,0.0011542783,0.00031395373,0.0003999623,0.00009844259,0.00019356089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026694604,0.00015786082,0.00037496144,0.0023842333,0.0003047074,0.0002608105,0.0007246536,0.00011924529,0.00016373167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021344492,0.00012994025,0.00011833634,0.0004438701,0.00028671263,0.0003279672,0.00012773713,0.0010745177,0.00001539495],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037994627,0.0010212554,0.83886063,0.00013013066,0.0005002307,0.011426903,0.08033885,0.000109583714,0.0020373543,0.031436794,0.012598922,0.017739883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.020973118,0.0011907727,0.6983919,0.0043237465,0.000023542272,0.00027296704,0.25275952,0.00014390657,0.00047895886,0.003992464,0.016700154,0.00074891135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022097904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016184393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17242067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009371711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000077902565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.529881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762049428","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12127","title":"The role of topic‐related background knowledge in visual attention to illustration and children's word learning during shared book reading","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"Lakehead University","keywords":"Reading (process); Psychology; Test (biology); Word (group theory); Word learning; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Vocabulary","score_opus":0.04932686739113471,"score_gpt":0.4228087198395788,"score_spread":0.37348185244844406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762049428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99275506,0.00097136566,0.0000073241717,0.0003751352,0.00021433402,0.0001988617,3.95498e-7,0.000004939169,0.005472562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954487,0.00022290707,0.00012820956,0.0000024657008,0.00013211514,0.000006714683,0.0000013868125,0.000014216298,0.004043287],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784464,0.00048528519,0.0006825473,0.00020361917,0.00035519947,0.00042871182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868286,0.00043011582,0.0003729654,0.00019394973,0.00020482496,0.00011528882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046940474,0.000103624385,0.0002403661,0.0007531339,0.0005115491,0.00029365567,0.0003228449,0.0001062585,0.000031836233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004519569,0.00008311615,0.000049970717,0.0002690365,0.00010199973,0.0004584997,0.0001379967,0.00096440566,0.0000113310625],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004571624,0.00011288378,0.8967904,0.000042145257,0.00009474004,0.00008371493,0.013792381,0.000059758037,0.01162459,0.0013495998,0.0001184873,0.07547418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009539767,0.00017389157,0.989353,0.001387364,0.0000045935626,0.00010803637,0.0054430985,0.00019590472,0.0006582064,0.00030517872,0.0013206386,0.000096128315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018405757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031691925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09256262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023868284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000064003216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41899166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800630406","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12241","title":"What methods of scoring young children's spelling best predict later spelling performance?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Institutes of Health; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Spelling; Psychology; Correctness; Linguistics; Test (biology); Computer science","score_opus":0.1160578144778716,"score_gpt":0.48258216327749587,"score_spread":0.36652434879962426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800630406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98453027,0.0011549334,0.0015200512,0.00012038718,0.0026500635,0.00017900493,7.7491615e-7,0.000008590653,0.009835926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9617291,0.0016100798,0.033031814,0.000011202487,0.0013997274,0.0000025843892,0.0000011523002,0.00003591753,0.0021784187],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99625623,0.00070733385,0.001114375,0.00029495716,0.0008417496,0.0007853618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977789,0.0006869061,0.00042118717,0.0003281393,0.00059006526,0.00019480364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01381655,0.00017432493,0.00046506102,0.0016707538,0.00014369926,0.00020654286,0.00053862506,0.00014328871,0.00029891348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022594877,0.00014481225,0.000119206794,0.0008965136,0.00025057394,0.00090367865,0.000114796356,0.0012402767,0.000117946096],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057573227,0.00023236514,0.84490454,0.0001691142,0.00030644183,0.00019790069,0.025856894,0.00022759491,0.0073564337,0.00023678892,0.00039319237,0.119542986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008166118,0.0072438517,0.5617409,0.039192863,0.00019470483,0.006394839,0.03287246,0.009687836,0.31341723,0.003692304,0.015596964,0.0017999626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000770118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003923644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3060608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021889064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001228647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59052724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888488504","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12256","title":"Establishing word representations through reading and spelling: comparing degree of orthographic learning","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"Medical Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Spelling; Reading (process); Orthographic projection; Psychology; Linguistics; Orthography; Word (group theory); Word recognition; Natural language processing; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.23464575098103094,"score_gpt":0.47280109819047983,"score_spread":0.2381553472094489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888488504","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94625545,0.0006415679,0.0015866617,0.00022223455,0.00046660486,0.0001349389,4.7525998e-7,0.000014428864,0.05067764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98609704,0.00031368298,0.012287374,0.000011183472,0.0004023314,0.0000038337375,0.0000014748804,0.000026615462,0.00085646927],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996546,0.0007601713,0.0010169636,0.00031183165,0.00074644625,0.00061860407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963764,0.0020408614,0.0005195777,0.0002565215,0.000642924,0.00016374294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072970665,0.00014424752,0.00045516875,0.0017240605,0.00027934453,0.00019302049,0.00036659816,0.0001117814,0.000083852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013125762,0.00013218046,0.00008736751,0.0017486935,0.00038792592,0.0006586669,0.00014190451,0.0014547356,0.000012073235],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025002178,0.000089022644,0.92989606,0.00008239068,0.0001243271,0.00026875656,0.03648223,0.000116673225,0.0019266938,0.0046814317,0.0004777713,0.025604645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043577026,0.0015110145,0.8744943,0.0086043505,0.00008317224,0.0019889409,0.06764322,0.0024513921,0.0049215015,0.011955034,0.021198489,0.00079085527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064909813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000059723752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055401705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000101066165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009720357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6320183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895180655","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12260","title":"The relation between syntactic awareness and contextual facilitation in word reading: What is the role of semantics?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Facilitation; Semantics (computer science); Reading (process); Context (archaeology); Task (project management); Psychology; Word (group theory); Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.09041496221073608,"score_gpt":0.4370859924347953,"score_spread":0.3466710302240592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895180655","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939423,0.0015259357,0.00007737369,0.002686371,0.00026208747,0.00018360629,0.0000010439202,0.0000027165113,0.0013185267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99879414,0.0005269278,0.0001256573,0.00001550229,0.000150632,0.000007179765,8.6707604e-7,0.000009387029,0.0003697305],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737537,0.000894321,0.00068162795,0.00015537806,0.0005542701,0.00033904507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945491,0.00448108,0.00029675476,0.00020556568,0.00040170108,0.000065788045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008879024,0.00008661946,0.00022358888,0.0005431954,0.00024384365,0.00018322367,0.00026859148,0.00009226165,0.000018590119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007913501,0.00005264044,0.00003906417,0.00058713456,0.00029580435,0.0004940898,0.00005564404,0.0006841161,0.000011717719],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000411476,0.000048517046,0.69949365,0.00003675254,0.00009900906,0.000024101897,0.08768678,0.0000050613344,0.0012673242,0.0038619956,0.00023842616,0.20682691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00097209454,0.00044877635,0.8650375,0.0022838204,0.000017083801,0.00008379932,0.10354936,0.00045199713,0.0024709685,0.014868322,0.009681392,0.0001348725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002840597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000048775884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20669204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015813946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010129759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30773103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921267722","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12272","title":"‘What does an <i>O</i> say when there's no <i>E</i> at the end?’ Parents' reading‐related knowledge and feedback during child‐to‐parent reading","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; McGill University","funders":"Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Praise; Reading (process); Developmental psychology; Literacy; Miscue analysis; Phonological awareness; Test (biology); Vocabulary; Nonverbal communication; Reading comprehension; Social psychology; Linguistics; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.03290623871592513,"score_gpt":0.37477634865299,"score_spread":0.34187010993706485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921267722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9620556,0.002887809,0.0000039338847,0.002394028,0.0032300956,0.00070211984,0.0000066915854,0.000035387056,0.028684327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96938145,0.0015099305,0.00023693906,0.00016342301,0.0005036511,0.00002826709,0.000008756733,0.000089734516,0.02807784],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99400496,0.0014980644,0.0012904573,0.00075617706,0.0011005228,0.0013498011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962526,0.0013408795,0.00046181277,0.00082272955,0.0005026054,0.0006193569],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008251355,0.0003984781,0.0007006025,0.0011669635,0.00057538314,0.00061478757,0.0009870752,0.00024776385,0.00091669225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031371345,0.00024768413,0.00016160661,0.00093483436,0.00022766103,0.0010316756,0.00052251306,0.001967179,0.00084734394],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036105553,0.0012052645,0.6864761,0.00068070035,0.0010666919,0.0012525618,0.20645341,0.00020777839,0.026118942,0.0030099389,0.015077849,0.054840185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014396812,0.0035401403,0.48553005,0.03035553,0.00016701657,0.006330094,0.08049827,0.00040209427,0.015379176,0.0044942927,0.3560349,0.0028716107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017370317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000059435835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34095705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008155074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012462534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943585670","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12135","title":"Cross‐lagged panel analysis of reciprocal effects of morphological processing and reading in Chinese in a multilingual context","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Reading (process); Reading comprehension; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Context (archaeology); Path analysis (statistics); Linguistics; Reciprocal; Comprehension; Panel analysis; Affect (linguistics); Developmental psychology; Panel data; Social psychology; Communication; Computer science","score_opus":0.09112353795567756,"score_gpt":0.47990532111767215,"score_spread":0.3887817831619946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943585670","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99795926,0.0007798433,0.00008451051,0.00006678909,0.0001373638,0.0002073897,0.0000016524149,0.0000041799444,0.0007590448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980458,0.00006686293,0.0016410223,0.00001601932,0.00008272593,0.000010979196,0.0000013177456,0.000014369035,0.00012087988],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962267,0.00088711054,0.0013726783,0.00033591592,0.0006160135,0.0005615586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99633634,0.0023413799,0.00049790536,0.00018989462,0.0004957762,0.00013872475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008432718,0.0001636235,0.0009171641,0.004024921,0.00005830843,0.00004497778,0.00029235514,0.00020778901,0.000041182608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033231215,0.0001244536,0.00010620737,0.0033991772,0.00051752024,0.0002128305,0.000105129126,0.0010480356,0.000001676004],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013992137,0.0003676432,0.89946467,0.00023440657,0.00015848155,0.0014150934,0.02750246,0.00005522335,0.016152572,0.00005381642,0.000008484835,0.053187944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028206338,0.00063154264,0.98559445,0.0023376371,0.000031744687,0.00018127679,0.0022278219,0.0023694392,0.0033709488,0.0002685333,0.000029354573,0.00013663093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063467544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015550059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08612978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021617785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014441984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.507507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006104747","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12296","title":"Evaluating models of how morphological awareness connects to reading comprehension: A study in Portuguese","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Reading comprehension; Psychology; Comprehension; Reading (process); Orthography; Phonological awareness; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Portuguese","score_opus":0.4922997914179834,"score_gpt":0.5381441476704955,"score_spread":0.04584435625251204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006104747","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947494,0.00027345514,0.00046683697,0.0025004924,0.00026031776,0.00060523447,0.0000020090308,0.000011810422,0.001130415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950926,0.000024755613,0.0044369395,0.00012225524,0.00016077665,0.000029929148,0.0000012428276,0.000024424133,0.00010713387],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99447227,0.0018637532,0.0011480602,0.00044452323,0.001395681,0.00067572907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99653375,0.0017812229,0.0003614068,0.00027729876,0.0006490915,0.00039720692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010305238,0.0001844114,0.0007813739,0.0013479324,0.00007444281,0.00006514338,0.00058269035,0.00012024417,0.000077160614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019913267,0.00015238786,0.00009097487,0.00185027,0.000070944174,0.00027244005,0.00025480532,0.0012499676,0.000012689098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005338478,0.0024883125,0.6439266,0.0003689405,0.00031944815,0.024294809,0.18669228,0.028283805,0.044508792,0.00176415,0.0027955873,0.059218775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.020425921,0.022158876,0.66338694,0.00972235,0.00007756986,0.002095378,0.20790271,0.06318443,0.0036044251,0.0051275115,0.0008023616,0.001511545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019551403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011157247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05770723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002592661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024823894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62141967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038338846","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12313","title":"How morphology impacts reading and spelling: advancing the role of morphology in models of literacy development","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":199,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Coventry University","keywords":"Spelling; Morpheme; Literacy; Linguistics; Reading (process); CLARITY; Reading comprehension; Meaning (existential); Written language; Psychology; Comprehension; Word recognition; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.0832960300456811,"score_gpt":0.39870815633196577,"score_spread":0.3154121262862847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038338846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99187875,0.003022879,0.00071208045,0.0023223576,0.00014305561,0.00022564648,0.0000020663113,0.0000045567895,0.0016886049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98981637,0.00044634342,0.009416277,0.00007290362,0.000101395715,0.000006743102,0.0000013585777,0.000024709132,0.00011388573],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99643785,0.0007664638,0.0011957672,0.00030376256,0.0005747244,0.0007214346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99707323,0.0014837775,0.0006040607,0.00022414407,0.000378385,0.00023641085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056603737,0.00017887185,0.00066425075,0.0011814766,0.00006300781,0.000058048518,0.00048815558,0.00014940617,0.000030605537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078818324,0.00013315257,0.000071787734,0.0009781453,0.00020977602,0.00040978895,0.00017763607,0.0012047775,0.000003272347],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002221901,0.00043025264,0.42200598,0.0005275615,0.00032279425,0.0021026682,0.25883353,0.0024781937,0.21281634,0.007309675,0.00050134945,0.09044975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.020332558,0.006727683,0.27812555,0.015523045,0.00013850813,0.009054525,0.18326013,0.037310597,0.33705103,0.06629926,0.043646395,0.0025307075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012490943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000069803978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14388041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019445845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002713217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54298043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043211377","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12317","title":"Predicting the early growth of word and nonword reading fluency in a consistent syllabic orthography","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Education and Early Childhood Development; University of Alberta","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science","keywords":"Psychology; Syllabic verse; Fluency; Orthography; Phonological awareness; Reading (process); Rapid automatized naming; Vocabulary; Phonemic awareness; Verbal fluency test; Cognition; Phonology; Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Neuropsychology","score_opus":0.07816504447430789,"score_gpt":0.3851940588421601,"score_spread":0.30702901436785224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043211377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896428,0.0010989633,0.000028862465,0.0026165152,0.00026951235,0.00023463776,0.0000017069569,0.000007812269,0.006099184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998465,0.00024203629,0.00091795885,0.00007468953,0.00015362648,0.000012070857,4.0718163e-7,0.000018997525,0.00011518665],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99665976,0.0008120982,0.0010287628,0.0002579667,0.0007039187,0.0005375051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99744123,0.0014847736,0.00036163977,0.00017079017,0.00032933484,0.00021224639],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005796282,0.00013664056,0.00041363717,0.0011096622,0.00010299665,0.00008524128,0.00038177444,0.00009875406,0.000028532986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010628855,0.000098135395,0.00009700315,0.0019923805,0.00022209449,0.00020465556,0.000116616466,0.0014731159,0.000004185759],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034565883,0.00006497816,0.95750016,0.00013215253,0.00008925088,0.00043454685,0.030829493,0.0000056615004,0.0011184573,0.0016837859,0.0003971072,0.007398731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016887254,0.0007053981,0.98050034,0.0028425315,0.00002026216,0.00029166814,0.0111742895,0.00023225864,0.00030006084,0.0010058638,0.0010523034,0.00018628148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037459226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014555748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023000179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000683719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013176263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64000374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3083790845","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12325","title":"Examining the effects of Structured Word Inquiry on the reading and spelling skills of persistently poor Grade 3 readers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Spelling; Psychology; Phonology; Reading (process); Phonics; Test (biology); Orthography; Psychological intervention; Intervention (counseling); Linguistics; Phonological awareness; Phonemic awareness; Panacea (medicine); Developmental psychology; Literacy; Mathematics education; Primary education; Pedagogy; Medicine","score_opus":0.1428561740719084,"score_gpt":0.3993821142689534,"score_spread":0.256525940197045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3083790845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99425465,0.00071219914,0.00007489102,0.0031176428,0.00046189755,0.00029594716,0.0000012245135,0.0000049051064,0.0010766491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99835265,0.00025282224,0.00075149006,0.00017592935,0.00027862194,0.0000043732452,5.317488e-7,0.000023294377,0.00016029064],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966036,0.0010978819,0.0007586258,0.00024237912,0.00084375916,0.0004537244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928197,0.0060997624,0.00049871486,0.0002437411,0.00018312779,0.00015490083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004593217,0.0001576847,0.00043214648,0.00052786287,0.00013631153,0.00006273007,0.0005207279,0.000101114805,0.000030374455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002163301,0.00009068952,0.000102629914,0.00082061684,0.0003732659,0.00011407285,0.0000958708,0.0012740046,0.0000034355728],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018347056,0.00033307818,0.11942886,0.0015609654,0.0011973366,0.0010150623,0.684739,0.00038989456,0.09299787,0.005870372,0.0075065643,0.08312628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009052751,0.007604664,0.36719036,0.024123557,0.00028585023,0.0010537963,0.46020845,0.001348216,0.11698829,0.004629275,0.0063900184,0.0011247766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000361982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.407538e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2477615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009356378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007642998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5534987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110791983","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12341","title":"Orthographic learning and transfer of complex words: insights from eye tracking during reading and learning tasks","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Foundation for Innovation","keywords":"Eye tracking; Psychology; Reading (process); Dictation; Spelling; Eye movement; Orthography; Task (project management); Transfer of learning; Cognitive psychology; Word recognition; Computer science; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Speech recognition","score_opus":0.08911889397138673,"score_gpt":0.4023450572313913,"score_spread":0.3132261632600046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110791983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951741,0.0021142743,0.0003256998,0.0004852052,0.000095261894,0.00013791374,0.0000012967018,0.000020268315,0.0016459998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974247,0.0007812082,0.0013993429,0.000022429107,0.0002044168,0.000004330759,0.0000032405726,0.000037256028,0.0001230694],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963016,0.0012119513,0.0009323593,0.00038083948,0.00065620465,0.00051707705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99780357,0.0013186118,0.00023424154,0.0000995437,0.00021390771,0.00033014815],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023101047,0.00019513485,0.00059647515,0.0012050642,0.0003107965,0.00014342253,0.00021283721,0.00014444983,0.00009010544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060690515,0.00017719911,0.0000902396,0.0009808284,0.00020489689,0.0003456795,0.00008849055,0.0026269658,0.0000029849061],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00072908576,0.00006371877,0.7462308,0.00027323174,0.0002394005,0.0008034123,0.11704828,0.00019648719,0.10872596,0.0004500948,0.000020007896,0.025219541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00460258,0.0010493567,0.9259322,0.004520465,0.000058184476,0.00025986065,0.049802884,0.0015052217,0.0032017236,0.0005413844,0.007977982,0.00054812385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019154364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009933542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17970146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006182384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000515479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120916055","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12346","title":"Special issue editorial: Advances in understanding the role of morphemes in literacy development","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Morpheme; Spelling; Psychology; Literacy; Linguistics; Reading (process); Narrative; Cognitive science; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.06426042867067468,"score_gpt":0.4345764642028401,"score_spread":0.3703160355321654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120916055","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8150061,0.015976349,0.00025972765,0.002695694,0.047505755,0.00056652486,0.0000038549165,0.00001162674,0.117974386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97054887,0.00095441134,0.0022594747,0.000020939297,0.025376366,0.000016345095,0.0000019600984,0.000021634574,0.00080002873],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966355,0.00070864137,0.001018352,0.00020328179,0.00092657376,0.0005076252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977776,0.0014322134,0.00024390238,0.00017281972,0.00029433158,0.00007914872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062116273,0.00011231056,0.00034958814,0.0010979602,0.000070298025,0.000081808306,0.00035410593,0.000097967444,0.00031948992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006246652,0.000085179076,0.000053272077,0.0013678259,0.0000855657,0.00039567682,0.00009906631,0.0010780899,0.0000138345895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012019594,0.00087302725,0.4816965,0.00021748203,0.00012247036,0.0025888642,0.19843169,0.00037134936,0.0022799745,0.012298033,0.022267235,0.27765143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015394101,0.0001019085,0.024246505,0.0025410093,0.0000027712238,0.000112207264,0.0506511,0.000027803504,0.0027225409,0.015102318,0.90278715,0.00016530411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005754743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010392954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88051987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090803445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052279985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46838242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3144930132","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12361","title":"The development and validation of the Teachers' Self‐Efficacy Beliefs for Literacy Instruction in the 21st Century (TBLI21c) scale: a pilot study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Literacy; CLARITY; Scale (ratio); Mathematics education; Construct validity; Reading (process); Construct (python library); Active listening; Reading comprehension; Pedagogy; Psychometrics; Developmental psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.10751893928748643,"score_gpt":0.3822696418107857,"score_spread":0.27475070252329925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3144930132","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967017,0.00046170986,0.0000016617136,0.0014191908,0.00058953883,0.00039014517,0.0000011005488,0.0000019448105,0.0004329856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99876976,0.00024189804,0.00020965337,0.000020058558,0.00056811876,0.00002489515,0.0000020556558,0.000006350793,0.00015721595],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980817,0.0006315161,0.0004721429,0.00009516477,0.00052366004,0.00019586066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798083,0.0011733115,0.00018078712,0.00013841981,0.0004940096,0.000032659736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00529967,0.000062887106,0.00011352417,0.00022189958,0.00051322026,0.00042014907,0.0002254482,0.000016582251,0.000008842406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006138379,0.000031545715,0.000030094463,0.00023718098,0.000096650845,0.0003881905,0.000046575802,0.0004363462,4.5641522e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056661815,0.00067465985,0.017663185,0.0000451069,0.000024438023,0.0000019052321,0.9408734,0.0000026113778,0.00004572712,0.0009818426,0.00012393102,0.039506525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013672665,0.0004458429,0.11458967,0.0005054818,0.000014655526,0.000025805532,0.85085356,0.00001779924,0.0007661375,0.0009879814,0.0303588,0.00006696961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006126399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003437507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09692649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001435358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032478583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4051507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158201831","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12362","title":"What is the best way to characterise the contributions of oral language to reading comprehension: listening comprehension or individual oral language skills?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University; Dalhousie University; Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Reading comprehension; Psychology; Vocabulary; Comprehension; Reading (process); Linguistics; First language; Phonological awareness; Active listening; Cognitive psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.08037343864925096,"score_gpt":0.45229062220520666,"score_spread":0.3719171835559557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158201831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98225063,0.0014882535,0.000105404884,0.014121151,0.0011369183,0.0004363545,0.000040377305,0.00001225269,0.0004086862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918515,0.00024406506,0.0019640836,0.0012049258,0.00031460763,0.000027029238,0.000019702251,0.00003321091,0.004340862],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952673,0.0014642499,0.000957114,0.0003436845,0.0012012,0.0007664762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99543816,0.0023524081,0.0003057705,0.0006067838,0.0009326859,0.0003641657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056742267,0.00021646316,0.00057347224,0.000699966,0.00040109153,0.0004653715,0.0007639459,0.00011661736,0.0003700402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010719176,0.0001238586,0.00016712488,0.001643389,0.00013887152,0.00038423616,0.0004694779,0.0013093741,0.00009828892],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002673439,0.001198507,0.021167709,0.00020888173,0.00080867857,0.009625402,0.5599948,0.00020841356,0.138824,0.0013802923,0.030596329,0.23331353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0050806864,0.0017816671,0.22606544,0.016515922,0.00019843236,0.0037006806,0.52428603,0.00026899358,0.04778162,0.0002167648,0.17316417,0.00093959365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026723486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005332927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23237394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002409859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021811617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5688652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210752688","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12380","title":"Effects of year of post‐secondary study on reading skills for L1 and L2 speakers of English","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Canada Foundation for Innovation","keywords":"Psychology; Reading comprehension; Reading (process); Spelling; Vocabulary; Disadvantaged; Mathematics education; Language proficiency; Population; Linguistics; Demography","score_opus":0.03386798115364535,"score_gpt":0.40738094578024714,"score_spread":0.3735129646266018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210752688","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951971,0.000298131,0.000008467835,0.000053731914,0.0006050146,0.00055819,0.000015765625,0.0000031023249,0.003260457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99869543,0.00003330076,0.00064530165,0.00001197397,0.000109288565,0.00002544874,0.0000016155567,0.000021537102,0.00045607582],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710274,0.0007692113,0.00081639085,0.00020010339,0.0007698855,0.00034169594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952271,0.0033622996,0.0004864919,0.00019393234,0.00063065224,0.00009953899],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069958023,0.000106564956,0.00050830626,0.0014483945,0.00008018545,0.000014923016,0.0003062408,0.00004968942,0.0000736469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018151763,0.00009605987,0.00010113204,0.00052442326,0.00009645365,0.00009989379,0.00012857557,0.0007651215,6.925082e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0095273275,0.0068567893,0.45158938,0.0027280764,0.0015703376,0.0008803337,0.38572115,0.00013184977,0.055622604,0.0031764016,0.008722145,0.073473625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015865168,0.02509523,0.75436914,0.0033711516,0.00010147772,0.00011394587,0.14526735,0.000021740258,0.04595638,0.0012072755,0.008203753,0.00042738518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000089270885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000018000254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30277976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015763752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001586184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39172077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318559626","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12418","title":"The effects of expressions of fear induced by background music on reading comprehension","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Neuroscience and Music Perception","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Reading comprehension; Comprehension; Reading (process); Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Expression (computer science); Music psychology; Developmental psychology; Music education; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.24067906920988563,"score_gpt":0.44599864753343416,"score_spread":0.20531957832354852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318559626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983443,0.000014798648,0.000007322396,0.0003298765,0.000565487,0.00019589176,0.0000016107892,0.000008548555,0.0005321659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989917,0.00066168176,0.00002055984,0.000052222957,0.0000696986,0.000004342634,1.9646897e-7,0.000011929492,0.0001876586],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99674594,0.0007832449,0.0004588331,0.00020847074,0.001373729,0.00042979725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99353224,0.005675504,0.0002823542,0.00025639826,0.00013984478,0.000113639],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002911815,0.00008717833,0.00022425676,0.0007958224,0.0003201097,0.00005496631,0.00053290406,0.000059793245,0.0000057834677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035694751,0.000056956957,0.00007951104,0.0018729226,0.0002932419,0.00029924573,0.00017144455,0.0007493021,0.0000116292085],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009243574,0.00006806973,0.00011130113,0.00006571177,0.0000013051516,0.000059574406,0.0004928326,0.000024367564,0.99327546,0.00025784536,0.002244191,0.0033069234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055101025,0.0009629238,0.007232687,0.0018379004,0.0000029623645,0.00002697318,0.0009854318,0.00049977994,0.9864587,0.00064574316,0.0007286211,0.000067244975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000261911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001953592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007121386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008985168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000096874006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4273253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388647224","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12439","title":"The <i>magic</i> in <i>magician</i>: Contributions of phonological dimensions of morphological awareness to children's reading development","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Phonological awareness; Phonemic awareness; Phonology; Reading (process); Vocabulary; Comprehension; Linguistics; Reading comprehension; Vocabulary development; Language development; Cognitive psychology; Learning to read; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.08453358008572395,"score_gpt":0.4393379232205205,"score_spread":0.3548043431347966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388647224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99515015,0.0003325252,0.0001396647,0.0019901202,0.00042017325,0.0003828416,0.000012841012,0.000016453201,0.0015552392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976941,0.0003312289,0.0013635128,0.000045941135,0.00007052636,0.000036472888,0.0000069789226,0.000015748714,0.00043551446],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952752,0.0009822274,0.0015820111,0.00031061532,0.0009092237,0.0009407508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952027,0.0032391741,0.00038001148,0.00032991634,0.0006258668,0.00022230216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011453043,0.00017193056,0.00061002636,0.0016654135,0.00023308716,0.000041479525,0.00073037687,0.00017747068,0.000040327213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021251696,0.00010422385,0.0001183496,0.0031318201,0.00029095178,0.00010045443,0.0003100176,0.0011445675,0.00006601049],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015078543,0.0011689303,0.8824891,0.00006907412,0.0003227245,0.003012248,0.01469763,0.0011999682,0.038491923,0.01125576,0.013131285,0.032653533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025114468,0.0007073984,0.95168877,0.0020626565,0.000014440435,0.00076670287,0.0057654437,0.00008411094,0.01639962,0.0023911814,0.017264772,0.0003434868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001907342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024114664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06919967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026968954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039412276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.497264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391188149","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12444","title":"<i>vgck</i> versus <i>vack</i>: The contributions of children's early sub‐lexical orthographic knowledge to gains in word reading","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University; Dalhousie University; Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Reading (process); Orthographic projection; Vocabulary; Linguistics; Psychology; Word (group theory); Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0820001622974675,"score_gpt":0.459561712490656,"score_spread":0.37756155019318854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391188149","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863939,0.0029927325,0.00014891634,0.0022665884,0.0013858733,0.00039659074,0.000018933968,0.000021040823,0.006375401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985297,0.0003204063,0.0002164427,0.000029990699,0.000395207,0.000026031572,0.0000036824995,0.00003186965,0.0004467135],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958374,0.0010642866,0.0011083916,0.00035122715,0.000735209,0.0009035182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954912,0.0032800618,0.00014824046,0.00035617567,0.00043542468,0.00028890252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0096652135,0.00019120408,0.00046588085,0.0028286518,0.0001503858,0.00017675916,0.0006417638,0.00017153105,0.00004357791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010002595,0.00013866153,0.00021785611,0.0042838915,0.00022241106,0.00022768398,0.00014822769,0.0021811458,0.00007666105],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0064064614,0.001903912,0.6113441,0.00038522977,0.0016510607,0.004176548,0.08316233,0.00033529662,0.018104052,0.11270164,0.049098328,0.11073107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0117185265,0.004226561,0.8481079,0.02031308,0.0001757822,0.0016002633,0.010368495,0.00038245332,0.012467149,0.007023538,0.08213464,0.0014816115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027097185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007141839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23676382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037375296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037511653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94761145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393411741","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12450","title":"The impact of online learning during the pandemic on language and reading performance in English–French bilingual children","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Reading (process); Pandemic; Linguistics; Psychology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); English language; Computer science; Mathematics education; Medicine","score_opus":0.03455227213823439,"score_gpt":0.4284508309277703,"score_spread":0.39389855878953595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393411741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953899,0.002587348,0.0000010473435,0.00010375154,0.00022161817,0.00013559069,0.0000023743692,0.000013276114,0.0015451037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969033,0.0012984249,0.000040691815,0.0000025504796,0.0003556552,0.00000384846,0.0000014444203,0.000019033841,0.0013750222],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770665,0.0005653231,0.0005825012,0.00018891568,0.00046703237,0.000489586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99723405,0.002259616,0.00014002703,0.00017601778,0.00011651146,0.00007375955],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073099406,0.000121675235,0.00023137647,0.0009150965,0.00017957152,0.00013905179,0.00032286468,0.00007555429,0.000020079608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009279625,0.00006322124,0.00007987607,0.0008164308,0.00013098109,0.00015395589,0.000081643906,0.0023163946,0.0000034657785],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018777674,0.00005278884,0.8878119,0.000056957557,0.000100562844,0.0001641409,0.052599654,0.0007692233,0.0011690985,0.0000826683,0.000073040705,0.056932207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000512331,0.00038896658,0.987609,0.0021370607,0.0000041732733,0.00033380574,0.0075881956,0.00085082476,0.00018446764,0.000045676166,0.0002625731,0.00008287029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036375428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003418658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.099797174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003319284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001787905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394953352","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12451","title":"Drawing attention to print or meaning: How parents read with their preschool‐aged children on paper and on screens","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Child Development and Digital Technology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Mitacs","keywords":"Psychology; Meaning (existential); Developmental psychology; Emergent literacy; Linguistics; Pedagogy; Literacy","score_opus":0.08928825105623613,"score_gpt":0.3925204856321094,"score_spread":0.3032322345758733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394953352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9766243,0.0000886971,0.000049100512,0.009320114,0.00008190783,0.00028163238,0.0000013615173,0.000033550932,0.013519342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981328,0.00023878999,0.00041152412,0.000046827106,0.00016447314,0.0000048479965,7.33914e-7,0.000012248477,0.0009877504],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981751,0.00021109896,0.00019045878,0.0002125693,0.00083213754,0.00037867684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912024,0.00044821965,0.000051168983,0.00009984709,0.0001088242,0.0001717017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030125948,0.000091132206,0.00016143383,0.00084926107,0.00026041915,0.0005339967,0.00023951907,0.000076887685,0.00001786872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009848708,0.000056769462,0.00003447319,0.00078645756,0.00012292573,0.00044125936,0.00009026124,0.00071904383,0.0000063587686],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019602205,0.00028129705,0.62967587,0.000103101615,0.00028221856,0.0011639113,0.019792251,0.00003879973,0.0023083761,0.043253615,0.00490818,0.29623216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019697554,0.003714425,0.914567,0.014381639,0.000018731074,0.00019548983,0.02527774,0.00006127807,0.0016760953,0.01380307,0.023774652,0.0005601142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007708973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045201802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29567206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026007555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020149449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51493424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399792986","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12461","title":"Children's reading outcomes in digital and print mediums: A systematic review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Reading (process); Linguistics","score_opus":0.08772311407033755,"score_gpt":0.40596997533349244,"score_spread":0.3182468612631549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399792986","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000033620672,0.99657875,0.000045648216,0.00030352495,0.00020252005,0.0011298732,0.0000024881595,0.000024343855,0.0016792363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00010152999,0.99796313,0.0005066748,0.000022860124,0.00008384776,0.000053935484,0.0000013439719,0.000025145211,0.0012415398],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.995469,0.00036391098,0.001942696,0.00040458792,0.0013225992,0.00049721333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973694,0.0013616468,0.0005592564,0.0003475717,0.00012827352,0.00023386728],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052604876,0.00031969027,0.0025175703,0.0037407207,0.000062322964,0.0018812624,0.0014027623,0.00013817755,0.0000020187763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024966314,0.00019473444,0.00034367642,0.003444268,0.00006547132,0.0021329238,0.00094700983,0.0014955535,0.00002872231],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002549283,0.00005330799,0.0005609808,0.866116,0.00023034266,0.000832284,0.00026196137,1.8581036e-7,2.6357839e-8,0.0018357384,0.00075122196,0.1293554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010199041,0.00007906039,0.00001762712,0.9625743,0.00007029304,0.0009922924,0.000027312466,0.00002375998,2.386121e-7,0.0010209157,0.034868434,0.00022379744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000035148637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.481695e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12913162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000359644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079945487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99915487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401436923","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12468","title":"Scrolling and hyperlinks: The effects of two prevalent digital features on children's digital reading comprehension","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Scrolling; Hyperlink; Comprehension; Reading (process); Computer science; Psychology; Multimedia; Reading comprehension; Consistency (knowledge bases); Web page; World Wide Web; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02468765610836991,"score_gpt":0.3177708309221613,"score_spread":0.29308317481379137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401436923","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901526,0.0034876768,0.0009622949,0.0009191602,0.00035037665,0.0002478032,0.0000019138988,0.00003349289,0.003844691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99836344,0.00025872252,0.0005387741,0.000022089236,0.00015574571,0.0000020546363,7.1941537e-7,0.000010659356,0.0006477839],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808127,0.00010558997,0.00036210116,0.00022372963,0.00093045214,0.0002968476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99667984,0.0028351245,0.00009655142,0.000164017,0.00010613539,0.00011831029],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008432048,0.00012058367,0.0002063654,0.0009406323,0.00015536472,0.0023464824,0.00054674386,0.000044683387,9.641471e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048332984,0.00007359069,0.000088710265,0.0011172075,0.0001176921,0.0024447942,0.00033344288,0.0006573305,0.0000029863286],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044531908,0.00044267924,0.066584565,0.0011668412,0.0004573597,0.0018490244,0.0097534135,0.0015338556,0.0036553862,0.037382394,0.00764155,0.86908764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016555281,0.018204749,0.32246277,0.1050277,0.00012604237,0.014350665,0.0031474158,0.0970285,0.16436692,0.214578,0.040453833,0.003698128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003069428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.7428437e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86538947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000076997014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013190699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402788247","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12472","title":"What we have learned about learning to read in a digital age and children's contemporary reading experiences","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Reading (process); Learning to read; Developmental psychology; Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Literacy","score_opus":0.10372471987508138,"score_gpt":0.4468254866869666,"score_spread":0.3431007668118852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402788247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9762876,0.009567157,0.000029102752,0.002309336,0.0007593882,0.00025239476,0.0000011169216,0.000027722272,0.010766188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912222,0.0012582054,0.00028563838,0.00003605975,0.00025969037,0.00003728503,0.000003005436,0.000035091674,0.0068627954],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968803,0.00042250208,0.0008226488,0.00046072088,0.0007255318,0.00068829843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998076,0.0012128034,0.00012281917,0.00016925442,0.00011493063,0.00030417927],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005015828,0.00019151537,0.00043323834,0.0026014082,0.00012214488,0.0018281838,0.00033086014,0.00013384319,0.00007696467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007723997,0.00016095296,0.00007770758,0.0010459478,0.00020810367,0.0015538929,0.00015518501,0.0017950181,0.000045647572],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058694696,0.00012888566,0.16719505,0.00013013615,0.00013527895,0.01407067,0.47478244,0.000053170294,0.00044697046,0.0012778037,0.0026586207,0.33853403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002663696,0.0020246222,0.0803429,0.038526345,0.000011425031,0.0032844616,0.76853627,0.00050071365,0.00037328215,0.00429357,0.09847342,0.0009693059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026381397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000144341575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33756474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028023167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018203011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99920803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406939197","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12477","title":"Learning spellings and meanings: Longitudinal relations to reading","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université TÉLUQ; Dalhousie University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Dalhousie University","keywords":"Psychology; Reading (process); Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07509280677284598,"score_gpt":0.45348874201099226,"score_spread":0.3783959352381463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406939197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9041815,0.0005107845,0.0016021526,0.0028156813,0.00051938446,0.00017235009,4.6793653e-7,0.000017265962,0.09018046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96419835,0.00009406511,0.0055498295,0.00005468496,0.00015021593,0.000004326214,4.7029067e-7,0.000015514388,0.02993257],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976703,0.00040904674,0.0006529316,0.000267137,0.0004746614,0.00052595267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772155,0.0014289184,0.00015605557,0.00014796075,0.00035061527,0.00019487138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068883635,0.00011665661,0.00029234524,0.0025131446,0.00024124667,0.00016822005,0.00024359363,0.00009954567,0.00014335867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013443872,0.00010706013,0.000054430675,0.0014687339,0.000075483724,0.00021736683,0.000109823144,0.0014321122,0.00006110598],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040661896,0.000111170506,0.88731706,0.000089602334,0.0001887779,0.000757763,0.03286069,0.0008209679,0.0019640191,0.026030393,0.018713033,0.030739909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042515285,0.001929609,0.5572625,0.016018573,0.000086727654,0.001481796,0.042713404,0.0013696804,0.0021659604,0.021615801,0.35019168,0.0009127736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011213067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004475922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33147866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003282912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012578604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62218946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406999113","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12478","title":"Exploring the roles of L1 reading, L2 proficiency, strategy use and anxiety in L2 Reading comprehension","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Second Language Acquisition and Learning","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Reading (process); Reading comprehension; Anxiety; Comprehension; Linguistics; Language proficiency; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.24394547467263586,"score_gpt":0.45588371797996585,"score_spread":0.21193824330733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406999113","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.991977,0.002303081,0.00007166473,0.00043573062,0.00022468956,0.00020338902,0.0000010952956,0.0000089072455,0.004774437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99858195,0.00054195075,0.00023293376,0.00012105,0.00009120565,0.000012052599,9.550741e-7,0.000014038684,0.0004038744],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970253,0.0010781913,0.0007037748,0.00024369595,0.00046248653,0.0004865188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975438,0.0016005399,0.00024002937,0.0002659004,0.00026222394,0.000087485285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005795726,0.00012415933,0.00033665213,0.0015483624,0.00016086792,0.00012717335,0.00032369673,0.000091013295,0.00021997902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007225605,0.00009208683,0.000069494854,0.0012151971,0.00018471516,0.00054455176,0.00012257998,0.0014466355,0.000003596535],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001886643,0.00060191535,0.51914203,0.00055216707,0.00023244068,0.0017042424,0.07777506,0.0020666206,0.13529034,0.037212905,0.001825195,0.22171046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031336066,0.00068379054,0.7854556,0.0056264624,0.000029646515,0.0004826579,0.18865284,0.002215544,0.00775279,0.0013309313,0.004315069,0.0003210907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003971802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000052048814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26631355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009949852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6284992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409631191","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.70031","title":"Cross-Linguistic Transfer of Phonological Awareness and Reading Skills in Russian-Uzbek Bilingual Children","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Educational Practices and Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Delaware","keywords":"Uzbek; Linguistics; Phonological awareness; Reading (process); Psychology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14553337479012932,"score_gpt":0.5354618729287639,"score_spread":0.3899284981386346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409631191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98374313,0.002337966,0.00002765725,0.0026100632,0.00056041335,0.00026883185,0.000015639584,0.0000055767277,0.010430703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842766,0.013947331,0.0007481456,0.000011725204,0.000635653,0.00000667519,0.0000029361136,0.000008991561,0.00036194257],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959811,0.0012477784,0.0008907598,0.00033677154,0.0010450223,0.00049859216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943094,0.0044946056,0.00027758614,0.00017159077,0.0005807689,0.00016603217],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012575529,0.00015232996,0.00055609655,0.0012893605,0.0002496767,0.0002062308,0.0006674659,0.00042060416,0.00005435806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074651414,0.00013460308,0.00011498034,0.0006220332,0.0006363838,0.00019486141,0.00024014013,0.0026856426,7.5288216e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032172885,0.00087987044,0.86400914,0.0008632481,0.00015853168,0.00026400673,0.06958648,0.0011977251,0.00009092539,0.048387207,0.000034028773,0.014207132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00213184,0.00043158856,0.7935718,0.0165048,0.000080383805,0.00007479893,0.0407997,0.00021868694,0.0006896585,0.1423857,0.0024060162,0.0007049763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043807058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014718297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0939985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042105667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032394652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410522734","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.70006","title":"Examining the role of home literacy environment in the growth of morphological awareness from kindergarten to Grade 2","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Literacy; Analogy; Vocabulary; Context (archaeology); Developmental psychology; Early literacy; Emergent literacy; Phonological awareness; Vocabulary development; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Teaching method; Linguistics","score_opus":0.08900979541781985,"score_gpt":0.4104492460698954,"score_spread":0.3214394506520756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410522734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99401337,0.0009061753,0.00016467008,0.0022103845,0.00016180488,0.00019489156,0.0000045395923,0.000001870466,0.0023422807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986228,0.000107997526,0.0009467216,0.00009186886,0.000068398316,0.00002504587,0.0000013916473,0.000007330669,0.00012847887],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996567,0.0013491703,0.00081138406,0.00020090395,0.00070134905,0.00037016274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99607587,0.0032152992,0.00021885984,0.0003251182,0.00010544092,0.000059432325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00621575,0.00010619058,0.00034615982,0.0008583724,0.000066799264,0.000047030586,0.0008637131,0.00008784339,0.00008032375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003583414,0.000059521815,0.000067151945,0.0008474811,0.0001333263,0.000098532175,0.00015685835,0.0008682277,0.0000067220244],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004219948,0.00051219075,0.90856564,0.000035281744,0.000117962845,0.00058784214,0.04744948,0.00014751061,0.011540002,0.0036865852,0.0006647792,0.026270753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008325514,0.00031681525,0.9598622,0.001010125,0.000010382624,0.00007983599,0.014778181,0.000065954264,0.002552491,0.01759953,0.0028012309,0.00009074749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006003997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000052575692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05129654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014142292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008876632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37720656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414190790","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.70012","title":"The contributions of individual oral language skills to kindergarten students' reading comprehension","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Reading comprehension; Reading (process); Comprehension; Listening comprehension; Active listening; Language assessment; Set (abstract data type); Second-language attrition","score_opus":0.045067603630712584,"score_gpt":0.48987755079022777,"score_spread":0.44480994715951516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414190790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902773,0.0006503723,0.00040549252,0.0025089534,0.00081200514,0.00031550814,0.0000103958855,0.000008710691,0.00501129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99572414,0.0000669295,0.000814371,0.00010563357,0.00009168685,0.000014128756,0.0000027991018,0.000009937263,0.0031703985],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964838,0.0008904027,0.00081212015,0.00017584034,0.0010801483,0.0005576802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996141,0.0026376734,0.00021136034,0.0002867877,0.0005773462,0.00014579449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009627502,0.000107694505,0.0003382999,0.0012301124,0.00026442588,0.0001630804,0.0008542237,0.000094280054,0.00003730251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011684652,0.000074613075,0.0000880991,0.0012488633,0.000116114104,0.00010562827,0.0002694829,0.00089311105,0.000023045432],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020059557,0.0021226844,0.44553766,0.00017447464,0.0019454825,0.0015327911,0.09514181,0.00025008348,0.031890213,0.048620176,0.12687856,0.24390012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005780074,0.0009824956,0.83128566,0.005674797,0.00007725064,0.00025498858,0.04505457,0.000042871365,0.01229439,0.004005184,0.094177105,0.00037062305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011865465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015326625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.385748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028140168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018199447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3880173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}