{"meta":{"query_hash":"43fd51bcb670","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching"},"cohort_total":69,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":69,"exported":69,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/43fd51bcb670","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Research+in+Science+Teaching"},"results":[{"id":"W1485663774","doi":"10.1002/tea.21060","title":"Emotional arousal of beginning physics teachers during extended experimental investigations","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Teacher Education and Leadership Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Disappointment; Anger; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Mathematics education; Social psychology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.37269758508585643,"score_gpt":0.5497336073211513,"score_spread":0.17703602223529485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1485663774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99873716,0.000059593072,0.0001880508,0.000041530442,0.000006205543,0.00001934868,0.000014854444,0.000009335278,0.0009239741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987841,0.00007078644,0.00019410685,0.000035876277,0.0000084471585,0.00006603069,0.000026682503,0.0000059884355,0.00080799224],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983375,0.0007882468,0.00009956342,0.00023318092,0.00038406922,0.0001574261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909895,0.0040517957,0.002219461,0.0005254088,0.00096925383,0.001244556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017626683,0.0003131414,0.000699036,0.00037665223,0.0011788191,0.0019109752,0.00037174302,0.00067576586,0.002412151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015362571,0.00044374648,0.00022392349,0.00023329994,0.0014222893,0.00051150285,0.0019135408,0.0015314674,0.00044388272],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018376629,0.0032910595,0.40085554,0.0005571846,0.00011283043,0.0027444204,0.43781108,0.000272516,0.09835114,0.00038323217,0.0015013114,0.052281942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005219606,0.002408293,0.85674196,0.000106906904,0.000041252348,0.0009674366,0.12732236,0.00039116148,0.006189605,0.00029980927,0.005404117,0.00007493401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008930592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002098206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002412151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058267114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036880389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009322047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1487557252","doi":"10.1002/tea.21153","title":"The synergistic effect of affective factors on student learning outcomes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"National Science Council","keywords":"Science education; Psychology; Mathematics education; Phenomenon; Environmental education; Student engagement; Identity (music); Nature of Science; Social psychology; Pedagogy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02417867988641118,"score_gpt":0.4265226025004368,"score_spread":0.4023439226140256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1487557252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976421,0.000080202546,0.00030358636,0.000077011246,0.000007773492,0.00001269182,0.000052855765,0.00000995862,0.0018139366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99944144,0.000028045008,0.00012431013,0.000012092588,0.0000050819067,0.00000770615,0.000044358057,0.0000023572802,0.0003345614],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785906,0.0008849303,0.0001430313,0.00022362714,0.00059481343,0.000294606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855422,0.007946681,0.0022580472,0.0006561592,0.0011177834,0.0024791283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022979348,0.00023962013,0.00038835162,0.0006585132,0.0005002441,0.00201338,0.00032143315,0.00035694937,0.004523656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012720935,0.00009220159,0.00047057608,0.00048103466,0.0003459301,0.0005126193,0.0014071346,0.00074528996,0.00044851843],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005461005,0.0014831007,0.9452736,0.00008115665,0.00032245874,0.00011219834,0.0008519928,0.0006934481,0.0022594538,0.00026412553,0.00024389234,0.047868527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007853468,0.00036185322,0.9970854,0.000013809091,0.00006929725,0.000027622438,0.0005681922,0.00066605135,0.0006315376,0.00023002666,0.00032843102,0.000009965827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013750519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023027237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004523656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035745592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005959305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0151331425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526461237","doi":"10.1002/tea.21141","title":"Reframing research on informal teaching and learning in science: Comments and commentary at the heart of a new vision for the field","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Innovative Education and Learning Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Cognitive reframing; Sociology; Science education; Epistemology; Grounded theory; Learning sciences; Learning theory; Field (mathematics); Pedagogy; Diversity (politics); Educational research; Experiential learning; Psychology; Social science; Qualitative research; Social psychology","score_opus":0.20893360045123385,"score_gpt":0.6004201044970175,"score_spread":0.39148650404578367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526461237","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015679814,0.0039186603,0.00069668156,0.94176435,0.050522454,0.000035814362,0.000026356656,0.00003556132,0.0014320427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.047865033,0.0062378524,0.002214856,0.8707595,0.06595477,0.00041936268,0.000044365584,0.00032573834,0.00617862],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9159224,0.055303097,0.0046772966,0.004639391,0.014691319,0.0047664293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5844483,0.34326077,0.009884725,0.004983179,0.048641518,0.00878158],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.059771992,0.0020390889,0.0021504804,0.0030787443,0.020162528,0.014635806,0.009335428,0.041029938,0.002748759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23938107,0.0009855748,0.002418515,0.0033865632,0.03632006,0.018724391,0.011590494,0.06710743,0.0013219486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001146145,0.000037388483,0.0002248737,0.0014041926,0.00003637247,0.0026381467,0.21228255,0.00017374173,0.00085878366,0.024009144,0.7465019,0.011718283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024969519,0.00004498626,0.00036337593,0.0038058383,0.00003542142,0.00081561314,0.13433172,0.0003326635,0.00046339823,0.011517032,0.84810644,0.00015853734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025988147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030334566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.940228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023937255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02408078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31610835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592094823","doi":"10.1002/tea.21235","title":"Experimental evidence of the superiority of the prevalence model of conceptual change over the classical models and repetition","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptual change; Repetition (rhetorical device); Cognition; Psychology; Teaching method; Mathematics education; Concept learning; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.6733055901548778,"score_gpt":0.581618746847263,"score_spread":0.09168684330761478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1592094823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99307775,0.00007748374,0.0041158567,0.00008065245,0.00002648837,0.00039458935,0.000020677655,0.000017332162,0.002189183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878611,0.0000811419,0.009848696,0.00006683971,0.000028259643,0.0008218153,0.00003830055,0.000017560873,0.0012363903],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909705,0.0050362954,0.00056659675,0.0016226111,0.0015273446,0.00027671532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.947945,0.037977092,0.0057982304,0.005812387,0.0011860848,0.0012811995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010651973,0.0004997279,0.0005813465,0.0003796282,0.0005260886,0.0010480569,0.0011772695,0.00071612967,0.005166148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036847282,0.0006178401,0.0004153336,0.00017853157,0.0017771891,0.001712339,0.0011461676,0.0013605768,0.0005027144],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.046185832,0.16213751,0.2117805,0.0029429286,0.0011090707,0.0007053247,0.048418812,0.00541867,0.21646239,0.023712143,0.0020010262,0.27912584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00862774,0.28549808,0.565718,0.00031572834,0.0008835609,0.0018058114,0.008061702,0.030395329,0.062121484,0.02382031,0.012318138,0.00043412857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040122794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045651235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010651973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039485935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005696779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05633372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1905924488","doi":"10.1002/tea.21088","title":"Science identity trajectories of latecomers to science in college","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Career Development and Diversity","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Persistence (discontinuity); Science education; Construct (python library); Mathematics education; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; Aesthetics; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11700772689378522,"score_gpt":0.4724725776818442,"score_spread":0.355464850788059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1905924488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99852115,0.000052668558,0.00022342583,0.00022920109,0.000012048591,0.000015516029,0.000019729965,0.0000061289556,0.0009201776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981084,0.000068126756,0.00019237204,0.00004461424,0.0000059694958,0.000015827949,0.000049245806,0.0000063020743,0.0015090746],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858105,0.00047494058,0.000065550514,0.00017449773,0.00029463955,0.00040928362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909294,0.0018636952,0.0014427054,0.00048428756,0.0018624923,0.0034173988],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003545521,0.00023882184,0.0005979876,0.0019700713,0.0046002744,0.00509732,0.0010775734,0.001025784,0.0034797003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0139174815,0.0002627073,0.0002778468,0.00096142496,0.0016967455,0.0024262918,0.0046306523,0.0025066303,0.000538308],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027678147,0.00052140997,0.28406858,0.00007682572,0.0000138850255,0.001179655,0.6644942,0.00011381176,0.0033512653,0.0023611858,0.0010122884,0.042530093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000092285,0.0003773726,0.18255796,0.00007615801,0.0000065903573,0.0003066245,0.8073017,0.00036176326,0.0008739627,0.0009570345,0.007122302,0.000049349823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010849881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013826027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9953997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016093488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002055563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021573484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1951617065","doi":"10.1002/tea.21105","title":"“We could think of things that could be science”: Girls' re‐figuring of science in an out‐of‐school‐time club","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Club; Science education; Sociology; Sociocultural evolution; Figuring; Conversation; Media studies; Pedagogy; Psychology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.3456807385697034,"score_gpt":0.5584848036195793,"score_spread":0.21280406504987592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1951617065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97130615,0.00025673173,0.0031292483,0.0029964317,0.00022309709,0.0001295877,0.00011314563,0.000100114885,0.021745523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924508,0.00017747925,0.0010984762,0.00042337226,0.000037819784,0.00010014371,0.00005135231,0.000100309444,0.005560156],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99335325,0.0043063965,0.00015795272,0.00063200196,0.0005487051,0.0010016678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99314755,0.003113603,0.00065668614,0.0003454966,0.00054104655,0.0021956074],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071573104,0.0007443236,0.0008173792,0.0015634983,0.014295339,0.008695871,0.0019449819,0.0019570868,0.0053313076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008269294,0.0006193851,0.00090646424,0.00070744613,0.012099695,0.0041286144,0.009559512,0.0055317455,0.000870122],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005188638,0.0001354899,0.006453384,0.00008131289,0.0000124461885,0.001587898,0.97999257,0.00004171757,0.0017909578,0.00322652,0.0011737756,0.005452126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013990131,0.00013476916,0.0043496424,0.00012951333,0.000014974379,0.0008593947,0.9446652,0.00015649323,0.0014010828,0.0012107295,0.04703315,0.000031038555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005360949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008928013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98570466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002373883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002001055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03785193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966380625","doi":"10.1002/tea.20406","title":"Science student role: Evidence of social structural norms specific to school science","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Advanced Education; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Science education; Psychology; Agency (philosophy); Sociocultural evolution; Dialectic; Mathematics education; Exploratory research; Consistency (knowledge bases); Qualitative research; Structure and agency; Identity (music); Pedagogy; Social psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Social science","score_opus":0.23982786540992768,"score_gpt":0.6175206301682914,"score_spread":0.3776927647583637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966380625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942543,0.000042723488,0.00052423374,0.00020563284,0.00000698646,0.000019855084,0.000017050497,0.0000041165313,0.004925049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99975103,0.000016115291,0.00010570415,0.000013333977,0.0000023621226,0.000013442465,0.000009608675,0.0000020419104,0.00008623858],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821101,0.010692863,0.0011275264,0.0017580003,0.0034930503,0.00081834104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83275485,0.10586444,0.035704765,0.0101570375,0.010925298,0.0045935824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0124452105,0.00015308287,0.00037031563,0.0018434181,0.0019960478,0.003221564,0.0009686688,0.0005682698,0.0032246017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06575483,0.00027401673,0.0002504488,0.0010762064,0.007466595,0.0012907756,0.0029792306,0.0008079604,0.00015696484],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022462054,0.00051829795,0.7413646,0.00013736934,0.00007660411,0.00017783187,0.22937924,0.000147488,0.0016132405,0.007956696,0.00024132441,0.018162644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026468831,0.000274664,0.82864785,0.000086702836,0.000029140467,0.00018805558,0.16332798,0.00075309945,0.00082990987,0.0038056828,0.0019953724,0.000035028104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049618753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005752965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0124452105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014108018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002471089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065817356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969379996","doi":"10.1002/tea.20001","title":"Why educate “little scientists?” Examining the potential of practice‐based scientific literacy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":131,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific literacy; Agency (philosophy); Curriculum; Science education; Literacy; Mathematics education; Work (physics); Process (computing); Pedagogy; Sociology; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Social science; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.2300005072014985,"score_gpt":0.5697090228606678,"score_spread":0.3397085156591693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969379996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96927357,0.0004375677,0.004114482,0.012939659,0.000028993798,0.00006135804,0.000010274513,0.000018844921,0.013115244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99812466,0.00010288552,0.0009830042,0.0004825151,0.000009081117,0.000044171957,0.0000045633337,0.000004682527,0.00024434432],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9714049,0.0213553,0.000700877,0.0021224432,0.0027697103,0.0016468309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.71958566,0.22923975,0.028638372,0.009446964,0.0087236585,0.0043655895],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032337736,0.00026235887,0.00044154027,0.0024259342,0.002848968,0.009735359,0.0017398379,0.002580552,0.0029287266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13225973,0.0004184495,0.00039938037,0.0012358433,0.016525984,0.008847706,0.009598376,0.004284138,0.00029593002],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021925078,0.001725528,0.27690002,0.000659402,0.00011624439,0.0008065882,0.5385716,0.00040226293,0.0025167917,0.06852865,0.0016326068,0.107921086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014342237,0.0011103133,0.23920089,0.0020715194,0.00018340643,0.0009855964,0.5715895,0.0047919136,0.0066516595,0.14231804,0.03081232,0.00014134163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014822375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022377975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.997151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030824183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006250209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17102039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973562194","doi":"10.1002/tea.20275","title":"Natural pedagogical conversations in high school students' internship","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Internship; Conversation; Natural (archaeology); Psychology; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Science education; Medical education; Medicine","score_opus":0.33044744162149836,"score_gpt":0.6241920804576232,"score_spread":0.29374463883612484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973562194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99743515,0.00005957632,0.00070938177,0.00013140577,0.000010260897,0.000020520045,0.000022207569,0.000025817946,0.0015857525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99902415,0.000034715387,0.00038399745,0.00005392034,0.000007737426,0.000029465122,0.000026970778,0.000009434653,0.00042960804],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941765,0.0039054772,0.00021830443,0.0005198521,0.00061600783,0.0005638083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796888,0.013205298,0.0022669793,0.0008718382,0.000942262,0.0030248016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004986711,0.00042342496,0.00051898597,0.0016068836,0.0042812405,0.0039547104,0.0013894174,0.0017923564,0.0034250272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017268613,0.00048938714,0.0002918872,0.0007348729,0.0029997546,0.0016219692,0.007065434,0.00223568,0.00066206645],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038235687,0.00073317817,0.11350487,0.00018984896,0.000047923113,0.0012384258,0.8452519,0.0003333712,0.007055224,0.0023004753,0.0011487593,0.027813686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035561516,0.0005550807,0.12944531,0.0001430933,0.000032727014,0.0007310018,0.8378749,0.0016523391,0.0033509284,0.0019200328,0.024160285,0.00009889746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014582361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025243259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004986711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014359129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008819783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026372612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976183541","doi":"10.1002/tea.10114","title":"Emergence, flexibility, and stabilization of language in a physics classroom","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Flexibility (engineering); German; Phenomenon; Mathematics education; Science education; Teaching method; Sociology; Epistemology; Linguistics; Psychology; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.25368838062180427,"score_gpt":0.5679914771303536,"score_spread":0.3143030965085493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976183541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967564,0.00002186924,0.0009077451,0.000121418576,0.0000019131596,0.000006874968,0.0000024440528,0.000010014406,0.0021713348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993748,0.000012373135,0.00037507853,0.000012710336,8.7039155e-7,0.00000922639,0.0000030550716,0.0000036885938,0.00020829927],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972205,0.0015021956,0.0000979222,0.00038701127,0.000546778,0.000245649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99425197,0.0037331516,0.0009236401,0.00037639475,0.00023544297,0.00047944786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023663717,0.00024987495,0.00028252846,0.0009343619,0.0015191669,0.0038133506,0.0004328256,0.00069125387,0.0013989668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008535037,0.00031254522,0.00018807375,0.00028564644,0.0076021706,0.0022649511,0.003963631,0.0014271506,0.00012371669],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005797488,0.0016281616,0.105971895,0.00029236212,0.000056972167,0.0015619607,0.61869615,0.0038085473,0.1181683,0.08034419,0.0008876296,0.06800402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004851669,0.0035452638,0.3597934,0.00028701662,0.00014297062,0.001972973,0.37748826,0.026535112,0.06509735,0.13403107,0.030290492,0.00033093838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009456434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001016939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038133506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011882326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001175813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01251477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977215039","doi":"10.1002/tea.20419","title":"Globalizing students acting for the common good","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":194,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; York University","keywords":"Consumerism; Science education; Sociology; Goods and services; Egalitarianism; Intangible good; Dualism; Consumption (sociology); Public relations; Environmental ethics; Economics; Political science; Social science; Epistemology; Law; Pedagogy; Politics","score_opus":0.459982540797794,"score_gpt":0.5957294216075077,"score_spread":0.13574688080971375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977215039","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26039076,0.0032942079,0.005765619,0.11060399,0.0016882509,0.00010431419,0.00007316156,0.00024056953,0.6178391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9556572,0.0008484139,0.00091296283,0.007218595,0.0001902522,0.000024802504,0.000021926366,0.00007140155,0.035054564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964857,0.0019221541,0.000069767804,0.0004406281,0.00038750155,0.00069433375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965765,0.000828125,0.0004882386,0.00051624,0.00041795845,0.0011729181],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045485464,0.00051237264,0.0005343986,0.0013057995,0.007276418,0.012774327,0.00074334996,0.0030436215,0.018940205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034921584,0.00017700992,0.00047979,0.00088243734,0.022567576,0.0072586155,0.009781677,0.0054357448,0.0023719673],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031349122,0.00017264001,0.0065086004,0.00014231906,0.000020899337,0.00042003664,0.15431155,0.0003485017,0.0008429998,0.7747568,0.030085977,0.032358278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026279884,0.000099394565,0.003946615,0.000329608,0.00003079076,0.00021271974,0.110221505,0.00061484525,0.0009043271,0.25739968,0.62616396,0.00005031051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017222974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026438423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018940205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030860105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028696423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06336129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987036165","doi":"10.1002/tea.20094","title":"Everyday objects of learning about health and healing and implications for science education","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Science education; Sociocultural evolution; Context (archaeology); Curriculum; Pedagogy; Learning sciences; Psychology; Obligation; Sociology; Mathematics education; Educational technology; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.2259657284230799,"score_gpt":0.6079655810149432,"score_spread":0.3819998525918633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987036165","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9361156,0.0016699501,0.0061338,0.0042510647,0.00007765615,0.000048000144,0.000030130937,0.000028773882,0.051644973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996992,0.00042938496,0.001016726,0.000090769514,0.000017843262,0.000012697202,0.000008008377,0.0000040750583,0.001428475],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977976,0.0017043698,0.0000527176,0.00009587656,0.00020174793,0.00014778631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99652773,0.0023869278,0.0004894506,0.00019528894,0.00015117208,0.00024940443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002676527,0.0002341883,0.000176075,0.0009984053,0.0047229663,0.004068099,0.0004662997,0.00077656854,0.0035414367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004023036,0.00016863555,0.0001735908,0.00068987446,0.01542425,0.002427705,0.0032584206,0.0010652347,0.00017388868],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053131702,0.00012205411,0.018253524,0.00023440122,0.000011573514,0.0012878686,0.8866055,0.00025017693,0.0030752397,0.048442617,0.0014351964,0.0402287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010587002,0.00013962848,0.01930411,0.0003200291,0.000011913348,0.0010507614,0.89142376,0.00024436132,0.0008704446,0.018247413,0.06834427,0.000032699452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015215571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001926422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047229663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013347638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010189605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01415503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988371629","doi":"10.1002/tea.20266","title":"Metacognitive engagement during field‐trip experiences: A case study of students in an amusement park physics program","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Metacognition; Psychology; Mathematics education; Amusement; Argumentative; Cognitive dissonance; Curiosity; Think aloud protocol; Science education; Cognition; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.4184811433073895,"score_gpt":0.6302846631503787,"score_spread":0.21180351984298917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988371629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983076,0.00003396939,0.00038088983,0.00023008976,0.0000064557535,0.000032288375,0.000015529347,0.000011342741,0.0009819897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979292,0.00008230516,0.0007074996,0.00008835025,0.000008079082,0.000031891163,0.000022090742,0.000010350761,0.0011201357],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749494,0.0011594266,0.00009193612,0.0003628511,0.0003168152,0.0005741609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956909,0.0016003961,0.0005381898,0.00028394064,0.0003913723,0.0014952257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024607035,0.0007994918,0.00077216694,0.001949149,0.009264493,0.0039001617,0.0024841959,0.0026825352,0.0024312714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061070365,0.0007961008,0.0006326854,0.0009815211,0.0042712814,0.0021138699,0.0045682685,0.0030555339,0.0004870995],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014575294,0.0024177663,0.04478825,0.0001724491,0.000044303502,0.014650724,0.9107985,0.00039054293,0.0036296973,0.00069245324,0.0009882719,0.021281285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003246306,0.0012472738,0.047945715,0.000101733705,0.000031859465,0.007086965,0.92102146,0.0010576493,0.0028316407,0.00069742306,0.017852042,0.00009386746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006080576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020143438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009264493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021003776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018999515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015239358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988888717","doi":"10.1002/tea.20245","title":"The writing on the wall: Classroom context, curriculum implementation, and student learning in integrated, community‐based science projects","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Diverse Educational Innovations Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Framing (construction); Discipline; Mathematics education; Context (archaeology); Pedagogy; Integrated curriculum; Science education; Sociology; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.1745288448804819,"score_gpt":0.4777921908135513,"score_spread":0.30326334593306936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988888717","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972818,0.000028444974,0.0005298326,0.0000963586,0.000006360032,0.000027641529,0.0000032993019,0.000009354198,0.0020169998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984358,0.000029906598,0.0007829807,0.000029154196,0.0000040485684,0.000033414963,0.000009371759,0.000005561385,0.0006697604],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914487,0.005921918,0.0002605665,0.00064652134,0.0011366303,0.00058556214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97944427,0.010838647,0.003935476,0.0012693099,0.0013540138,0.0031582622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063926354,0.00028899906,0.00046646348,0.0006496509,0.0021628055,0.0060467767,0.0011066356,0.00084692397,0.0033843783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037508402,0.0003471892,0.00024660805,0.00051474606,0.001999159,0.0015265696,0.004091212,0.0019328845,0.00037994486],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001109516,0.023590866,0.38437837,0.0005529484,0.00024336285,0.0018291613,0.20286307,0.004403634,0.021028316,0.009550534,0.0038073692,0.34664294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003157731,0.0065861735,0.70815915,0.00052442244,0.00020834366,0.00067026017,0.23123966,0.00643339,0.013912082,0.011559072,0.02019391,0.00019782399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009178804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019562962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063926354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011172487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019558056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033807933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989412404","doi":"10.1002/tea.20259","title":"Representations of scientists in Canadian high school and college textbooks","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Perceptions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Mathematics education; Semiotics; Sample (material); Sociology; Domain (mathematical analysis); Psychology; Pedagogy; Epistemology; Linguistics; Chemistry; Mathematics","score_opus":0.20330528181118424,"score_gpt":0.5371441528203745,"score_spread":0.3338388710091903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989412404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99067515,0.0002747467,0.00024117464,0.00029349033,0.000010953246,0.00002635598,0.0001471723,0.000009992322,0.008321061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975458,0.00030279058,0.00024314644,0.00006307073,0.000004407304,0.000009376226,0.00016226358,0.0000050877507,0.0016641456],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971583,0.00049918087,0.00014186754,0.0002251412,0.0016300032,0.0003456482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987336,0.0043990067,0.0026817604,0.00050629146,0.0036932717,0.0013836349],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028317445,0.00032704757,0.00041721493,0.0074170358,0.004322533,0.0056996425,0.0012151015,0.00090325443,0.0029704932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021147529,0.00022963781,0.00020474201,0.0075233416,0.005658575,0.001238267,0.0029373402,0.0009552175,0.00015794433],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011105133,0.000072082694,0.1863015,0.00024820326,0.000030686606,0.0006044453,0.7612544,0.0002273249,0.0037853029,0.0069167484,0.0020987866,0.03834959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023612709,0.00008459287,0.36840308,0.00024739536,0.000043398166,0.0004534319,0.5723743,0.0005794153,0.0011354862,0.0017309359,0.054822195,0.00010222217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71284395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7601009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9956775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018296849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016732508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5776943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990175035","doi":"10.1002/tea.21067","title":"New metaphors about culture: Implications for research in science teacher preparation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Science education; Sociology; Social science education; Ethnic group; Equity (law); Pedagogy; Social science; Epistemology; Psychology; Political science; Anthropology","score_opus":0.5191058058577324,"score_gpt":0.6724275424104231,"score_spread":0.15332173655269077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990175035","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15830168,0.09441361,0.10451551,0.4486406,0.0075788097,0.0006138479,0.00027102945,0.00014678237,0.18551807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9293176,0.022881221,0.026494324,0.014166291,0.0010420439,0.0010129663,0.00006223779,0.000096582036,0.0049267737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9596866,0.03645215,0.0005817388,0.0008962561,0.0012926813,0.0010906578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86896574,0.11745506,0.0036994382,0.0029253217,0.004218003,0.0027362923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04046656,0.0014331404,0.002085342,0.008056754,0.012806037,0.018809652,0.0053509222,0.006456463,0.006939644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04744897,0.0008197778,0.0014715462,0.009351579,0.09309087,0.05124007,0.012114445,0.015076394,0.000615525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028261997,0.000068185735,0.00047426843,0.0003824561,0.000012730713,0.00046050726,0.2057811,0.0002223481,0.000080201266,0.78456396,0.001994142,0.0059317737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002885635,0.000040750132,0.0006312588,0.0015124449,0.00001938599,0.00035983327,0.45697635,0.0008804119,0.00014334064,0.5008282,0.038522553,0.000056514265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075767036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076677646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04046656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012667245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007476847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21401018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000334156","doi":"10.1002/tea.20030","title":"Coteaching: Creating resources for learning and learning to teach chemistry in urban high schools","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":128,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Mathematics education; Honor; Pedagogy; Sociology; Agency (philosophy); Science education; Social studies; Teaching method; Psychology; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04467232902993583,"score_gpt":0.44283889613795974,"score_spread":0.3981665671080239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000334156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99164575,0.00009599935,0.0008051553,0.00047951497,0.000011604323,0.000041371342,0.000011582299,0.000031263084,0.0068777613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99570113,0.00007219264,0.001968636,0.000039576982,0.0000037484047,0.00002365121,0.000018610792,0.0000063705684,0.0021659913],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987483,0.00066243124,0.000026746638,0.00018465586,0.000101204576,0.0002766261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99709344,0.0005146322,0.00026022358,0.00021311952,0.00015002127,0.0017686058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015806714,0.00031981678,0.0003244399,0.00083517504,0.006311768,0.002940002,0.0011695927,0.0005515174,0.007727359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030154367,0.00028885916,0.00016507899,0.0005559082,0.002725116,0.0016887698,0.008073733,0.0008028387,0.0005506956],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005591555,0.0043075993,0.14284068,0.0005819117,0.000030853713,0.0030952003,0.4222902,0.0014514467,0.0156120695,0.020537518,0.009949431,0.37874404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015298522,0.001992681,0.17482117,0.00042721393,0.00007425101,0.001024766,0.65799767,0.0032235133,0.00817776,0.014392075,0.13758892,0.00012692067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069930195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025265584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007727359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016781051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004576207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025850594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010808139","doi":"10.1002/tea.20343","title":"Teaching about ethics through socioscientific issues in physics and chemistry: Teacher candidates' beliefs","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Archetype; Subject (documents); Mathematics education; Science education; Chemistry; Teacher education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Sociology; Computer science; Literature; Library science","score_opus":0.3037794294812641,"score_gpt":0.5836462905747329,"score_spread":0.27986686109346887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010808139","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99363226,0.00007433781,0.001053556,0.001561819,0.00001487881,0.000019501953,0.00000462071,0.000005619777,0.0036333473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989071,0.000049656323,0.00011695278,0.000090024696,0.0000049816617,0.000008511512,0.0000022175818,0.000002724251,0.0008178091],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932934,0.004424824,0.000245643,0.00027600766,0.0009741653,0.0007859691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97741324,0.014017603,0.0036598642,0.0006019637,0.0018392988,0.0024679194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007744213,0.00020066637,0.00035738555,0.0011636916,0.0048679993,0.003955732,0.0007294105,0.0011310994,0.003451906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01931731,0.0003682042,0.00021780033,0.0006432992,0.007204336,0.0017224187,0.0025179451,0.002165149,0.00039256815],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008048844,0.0002327831,0.07380823,0.0001302776,0.000010157352,0.0013601868,0.89914757,0.00016958863,0.002561545,0.009799619,0.0007961337,0.011903443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015061375,0.00020375116,0.017600775,0.00014872261,0.0000095976075,0.00076835137,0.9655746,0.00074835686,0.0010485975,0.0014812507,0.012373647,0.000027324488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028191376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032511714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007744213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023166046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033543124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040955782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018277211","doi":"10.1002/tea.10030","title":"Structural characteristics of university engineering students' conceptions of energy*","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"","keywords":"Paragraph; Mathematics education; Energy (signal processing); Curriculum; Psychology; Science education; Pedagogy; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.1868312501713779,"score_gpt":0.4896802766956428,"score_spread":0.30284902652426493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018277211","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948214,0.00006529487,0.0024580264,0.00016596515,0.0000044947205,0.00001738692,0.000025163625,0.000013325127,0.0024288616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99912685,0.000038783797,0.00040961217,0.000014248821,0.0000014958598,0.000015653804,0.000029501134,0.000004227283,0.0003595851],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963517,0.0018954342,0.00028280253,0.00024735968,0.0009880404,0.00023461302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97528154,0.015928619,0.0039273994,0.0011544909,0.0026450765,0.0010628814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004594444,0.00024484668,0.00031324234,0.002291244,0.00086549966,0.004379198,0.00064412743,0.0007351608,0.0020135639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026806066,0.00030593842,0.00035623054,0.0012556291,0.0026785159,0.0019203585,0.0021603978,0.0013247739,0.00021872368],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025133355,0.00023045919,0.22587202,0.0002877957,0.00006855662,0.00051343924,0.7002063,0.0011465871,0.011363306,0.018986767,0.0006366949,0.040436737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005541408,0.000502425,0.19479199,0.0003540418,0.000060102386,0.001200926,0.750856,0.005876,0.005822907,0.02053557,0.019764446,0.00018026943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006097665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005293246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004594444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011488304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083672197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024298012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030525854","doi":"10.1002/tea.20332","title":"Scientific literacy and contexts in PISA 2006 science","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Educational Assessment and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific literacy; Science education; Popular science; Literacy; Library science; Citation; Mathematics education; Sociology; Computer science; Pedagogy; Psychology","score_opus":0.14566067948544895,"score_gpt":0.5959413946273923,"score_spread":0.45028071514194334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030525854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.955028,0.00023256727,0.00020238888,0.0032799763,0.000024469062,0.000030227391,0.00009371795,0.00001207809,0.041096583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99749583,0.00012435754,0.00009964745,0.00020113333,0.00001204945,0.000043141565,0.00006966777,0.00000457063,0.0019494949],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684393,0.001346684,0.00018680574,0.00033629796,0.00065065635,0.0006356521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98847836,0.004484835,0.002570144,0.00035310426,0.0015146883,0.0025989623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003976324,0.00014449694,0.00034343472,0.0029043811,0.0052766814,0.0068723774,0.00046573774,0.00084664434,0.004856657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018155932,0.00024831365,0.00020119532,0.003111118,0.0039282697,0.0040287813,0.010022343,0.002799159,0.00041865397],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001797992,0.0010707262,0.46782017,0.00017667675,0.000023967144,0.0011522386,0.41941297,0.00024894893,0.000909085,0.028612265,0.004217862,0.076175205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013256298,0.00018316816,0.6648054,0.00018031566,0.000010382319,0.00038987497,0.29276413,0.00031165496,0.0005536149,0.007062731,0.033680093,0.00004535481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008679932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018873664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008679932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004553515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004621906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0330382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036352550","doi":"10.1002/tea.20060","title":"Developmental growth in students' concept of energy: Analysis of selected items from the TIMSS database","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Mathematics education; Test (biology); Rasch model; Psychology; Item response theory; Cognitive development; Energy (signal processing); Curriculum; Science education; Concept learning; Piaget's theory of cognitive development; Achievement test; Cognition; Item analysis; Classical test theory; Developmental psychology; Pedagogy; Psychometrics; Standardized test; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.1563988933828027,"score_gpt":0.5295182645943851,"score_spread":0.37311937121158245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036352550","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99870205,0.000018502653,0.00019287491,0.000017635162,0.0000021340288,0.000015494734,0.0007087887,0.000010970848,0.00033146175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974306,0.000026283366,0.0006610981,0.0000051341917,0.0000021716246,0.000066730914,0.0015880206,0.0000068168038,0.000213105],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913186,0.00024273123,0.000150892,0.000088745706,0.00032206965,0.000063711166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901134,0.0045618257,0.002689381,0.0005713986,0.0016171357,0.0004469349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021970994,0.00024677083,0.00031354648,0.0025851524,0.00024944506,0.00073791365,0.000503337,0.00036306237,0.0015329812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012808316,0.00015532605,0.00035471877,0.001837347,0.00022634157,0.00052556104,0.00081769243,0.00048052985,0.0005192836],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114456234,0.000101477286,0.98371315,0.00002447733,0.000022850021,0.000050629234,0.0007654011,0.00025642104,0.00046159263,0.0000796275,0.0002881172,0.014121831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033921228,0.000061864295,0.9974281,0.000005367423,0.0000060956395,0.000051473602,0.0005261989,0.000996214,0.0004139771,0.00004759386,0.00045494505,0.0000049066703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00280114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030698471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00280114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045721568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038658877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011619508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042032395","doi":"10.1002/tea.10122","title":"Prevalence, function, and structure of photographs in high school biology textbooks","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Digital Storytelling and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":227,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Subject matter; Relation (database); Mathematics education; Function (biology); Interpretation (philosophy); Focus (optics); Subject (documents); Science education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Computer science; Curriculum; Linguistics; Library science; Biology; Physics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10008188208443987,"score_gpt":0.4917033907251358,"score_spread":0.39162150864069595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042032395","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98924094,0.0013164373,0.0013195185,0.00022783293,0.00002928164,0.00003914988,0.00017334252,0.00003470661,0.007618889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99741614,0.00053615164,0.0008675987,0.000026596144,0.000020227646,0.00001819491,0.00012856747,0.000014520006,0.0009719855],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99573356,0.0021051117,0.0005012387,0.00044088694,0.0010343089,0.00018482994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93322104,0.041128915,0.016613472,0.002500938,0.0055209785,0.0010147439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029547953,0.00022274976,0.0003664793,0.005960182,0.00091220636,0.0027940564,0.0005489921,0.0006009598,0.0048010186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04687036,0.00037425788,0.0002226071,0.0033115868,0.001382266,0.0023916229,0.001956137,0.00053324667,0.0004488807],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005195176,0.00018290585,0.7211726,0.0016117204,0.000104481325,0.0015847329,0.12870751,0.0003120435,0.010511681,0.003872407,0.0023374534,0.12908302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017227912,0.00021484379,0.9219211,0.000581058,0.00011661376,0.0025320665,0.05616101,0.0007724031,0.0035820722,0.000986655,0.013068887,0.000046111323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018618273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028484613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005960182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001046632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005297501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016060948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050341665","doi":"10.1002/tea.20015","title":"Learning to write like a scientist: Coauthoring as an enculturation task","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Enculturation; Task (project management); Supervisor; Process (computing); Civility; Psychology; Writing process; Prewriting; Pedagogy; Engineering ethics; Mathematics education; Sociology; Computer science; Cooperative learning; Teaching method; Political science; Management","score_opus":0.1534310262692533,"score_gpt":0.5336386349651023,"score_spread":0.380207608695849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050341665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9612852,0.00045067264,0.017785178,0.0041754264,0.00013911744,0.00019737835,0.000015067471,0.00014374418,0.015808273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873949,0.00015162889,0.0086118,0.00019251372,0.00008018586,0.00009335867,0.000019421052,0.000042943986,0.003413219],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.91770107,0.06773708,0.0026233653,0.0031508072,0.006024597,0.0027631705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.73711514,0.19562514,0.02499072,0.016418668,0.011833972,0.014016367],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041922804,0.00086462015,0.0007276221,0.0038141424,0.022450507,0.010417979,0.0039586136,0.00489586,0.0043950793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12380227,0.0006560342,0.000728404,0.0019584983,0.008877537,0.0091962395,0.009853568,0.0030875262,0.0011869711],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002758306,0.0009255544,0.03475558,0.00029489334,0.000054482818,0.01439349,0.83360195,0.0009990775,0.004381633,0.01141618,0.0031279319,0.095773354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012453766,0.0007469527,0.011475515,0.00043760482,0.000071298455,0.014551781,0.8683608,0.007983979,0.006791357,0.017707357,0.07157984,0.00016895322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000985841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021189605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9775495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028018062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004067467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22171164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053173693","doi":"10.1002/tea.20363","title":"Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Career Development and Diversity","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1058,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Competence (human resources); Identity (music); Science education; Physics education; Mathematics education; Psychology; Social psychology; Physics","score_opus":0.2459867115279199,"score_gpt":0.4954332371992698,"score_spread":0.2494465256713499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053173693","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992213,0.00002597284,0.00003964334,0.000024865536,0.0000035659853,0.0000038942935,0.000021183941,8.025912e-7,0.00065875176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993761,0.00001748574,0.000021063284,0.000015410447,0.0000029286075,0.000005947351,0.000014760996,9.887939e-7,0.0005452269],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933666,0.00022286783,0.000033129127,0.000072881194,0.00013800236,0.00019650432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732673,0.00086840126,0.0006169432,0.00009337973,0.00021659075,0.0008779449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014750628,0.00022418861,0.00036503593,0.000988871,0.0015772338,0.0019191235,0.0003246837,0.00045720587,0.0063308924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030572352,0.00020346267,0.0003351031,0.0006147845,0.00074928824,0.0008597899,0.0011392208,0.00063891156,0.0006263112],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035307993,0.0011230031,0.9594867,0.000022973101,0.00002873443,0.00036008668,0.02618052,0.000038558912,0.0019485727,0.00063119276,0.00025417763,0.009572473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011834653,0.000618136,0.95278007,0.000020119045,0.000012997118,0.00028333452,0.044250023,0.00017445548,0.00048712705,0.00023161883,0.001115705,0.000014599386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020560278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035191153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063308924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003504389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045487168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021178901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058518083","doi":"10.1002/tea.20333","title":"PISA 2006: An assessment of scientific literacy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":313,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific literacy; Mathematics education; Test (biology); Literacy; Psychology; Reading (process); Science education; Scale (ratio); Achievement test; Pedagogy; Medical education; Standardized test; Medicine; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.2878043853163388,"score_gpt":0.6688702908396115,"score_spread":0.3810659055232727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058518083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8228866,0.0009227064,0.016768957,0.0015760781,0.0004165577,0.005186083,0.020672295,0.0020381839,0.12953253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88195866,0.0014864256,0.05239109,0.0004993058,0.00014940267,0.008773362,0.02103188,0.00024142685,0.033468354],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727505,0.0006095048,0.0004210589,0.00020721104,0.0013412348,0.00014595005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99368876,0.0010933839,0.0013445407,0.00043356157,0.0026753542,0.00076452625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003282005,0.00067791255,0.000758494,0.0053823898,0.00085887406,0.0015507672,0.00091442367,0.00068639155,0.009909955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011459065,0.00036495432,0.00089436513,0.0025001895,0.0004431139,0.0015168331,0.0025410266,0.0017117148,0.0029721726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018553019,0.004933325,0.47824034,0.0009024127,0.00026827704,0.0007270617,0.0025133616,0.003529196,0.006192514,0.0046809213,0.08317205,0.4129853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002508345,0.0028198427,0.91758955,0.00028332343,0.0001021365,0.001868792,0.0010931162,0.0062370994,0.007509622,0.0037817983,0.058358267,0.00010563564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009302886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012121403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009909955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007207491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018463176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033152103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067451132","doi":"10.1002/tea.20139","title":"Toward a new conception of conceptions: Interplay of talk, gestures, and structures in the setting","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Gesture; Semiotics; Dialectic; Pragmatics; Meaning (existential); Linguistics; Multimodality; Interpersonal communication; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Embodied cognition; Relation (database); Discourse analysis; Meaning-making; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Communication; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07173442565241635,"score_gpt":0.4516413018848394,"score_spread":0.3799068762324231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067451132","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14651726,0.015839625,0.5119601,0.06400907,0.0012573753,0.00030070037,0.00031252613,0.0007729698,0.25903043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9164377,0.0018723739,0.075284995,0.0013026488,0.0002817364,0.00027936694,0.0001126917,0.00021426038,0.004214206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906908,0.0059714597,0.00033892185,0.0013659104,0.0010201571,0.0006127528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99229586,0.003624103,0.0007641036,0.0013366602,0.00093885843,0.0010403122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011483927,0.0014440585,0.0015310292,0.00739344,0.006105251,0.021140644,0.004198257,0.00569994,0.0033513615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076771635,0.0011142556,0.0016594699,0.003483186,0.10145179,0.04237134,0.008693684,0.012629021,0.000607832],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014162206,0.000012223858,0.00037710564,0.00005032995,0.000005625777,0.00006109913,0.04695134,0.00021220013,0.00025901993,0.94898444,0.00024036232,0.0028321333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020061218,0.000046980247,0.00091737864,0.00014563806,0.00001878254,0.00038308068,0.030158551,0.0016810409,0.00025190867,0.93711245,0.029207272,0.000056789046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005497217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003483032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021140644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008787939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054013357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063761294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071318150","doi":"10.1002/tea.1031","title":"Learning science through technological design","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":199,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Science education; Mathematics education; Curriculum; Science, technology, society and environment education; Learning sciences; Computer science; Sociology; Educational technology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Pedagogy; Engineering","score_opus":0.49509823182023927,"score_gpt":0.6152720530086239,"score_spread":0.1201738211883846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071318150","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61552584,0.0009917199,0.12646651,0.005552261,0.00012760644,0.0004584866,0.00015771063,0.0003933146,0.2503266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9351517,0.0007648321,0.041632596,0.000310056,0.000029164099,0.00018108981,0.00012165495,0.00003779442,0.021771045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979133,0.0013782874,0.00007129941,0.00014562928,0.00036310838,0.00012839647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99744886,0.0015352755,0.00025373575,0.00045291145,0.00013270612,0.00017647073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016009315,0.00031989822,0.00020674866,0.000737463,0.0012437038,0.003056151,0.0007147762,0.00070660684,0.006512218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004660066,0.000196317,0.00037143822,0.000468586,0.0028512122,0.0020725846,0.0026331637,0.001464317,0.0008116362],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010880886,0.0014876352,0.026462516,0.0006370794,0.000056547626,0.0006403556,0.09665401,0.009082534,0.011496372,0.51475036,0.012929551,0.32569417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006649668,0.0008964433,0.013401274,0.0006129733,0.000040752897,0.0012795323,0.027754812,0.0111786015,0.012546169,0.34104857,0.5911203,0.000054118365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000577587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095125736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006512218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012058716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095902744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021785557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072469164","doi":"10.1002/tea.20425","title":"Networks of practice in science education research: A global context","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Global Education and Multiculturalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Inyuvesi Yakwazulu-Natali; University of Toronto; Technische Universiteit Eindhoven; Purdue University; Seoul National University; Nanyang Technological University; Daegu University; University of Waikato","keywords":"Sociology; Salience (neuroscience); Dominance (genetics); Narrative; Community of practice; Science education; Participatory action research; Public relations; Global education; Context (archaeology); Citizen journalism; Pedagogy; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.2919265255655226,"score_gpt":0.5893953375517554,"score_spread":0.2974688119862328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072469164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54324436,0.013937105,0.03441499,0.110322,0.00075898075,0.00014675486,0.000075300675,0.00010628449,0.29699427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99581736,0.0011164595,0.001320523,0.00052277604,0.000084880936,0.000025819027,0.0000066689,0.000012594811,0.0010929712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96384114,0.03122897,0.0005487997,0.001574526,0.0016241628,0.0011823894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9302745,0.056561347,0.004276567,0.0031462568,0.0019347732,0.0038065624],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0250019,0.00030268036,0.00047812815,0.0035463315,0.009784855,0.016712867,0.0010999715,0.0029172907,0.004772848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025629962,0.00036347136,0.00027711055,0.0032376724,0.051863026,0.01554959,0.012437265,0.0028723504,0.00021426476],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000331522,0.000055293436,0.008235953,0.00030836824,0.000024979527,0.0009961037,0.38089183,0.0010271806,0.00032586922,0.57264286,0.0023223185,0.033136122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003078639,0.000114049384,0.008607992,0.0009633789,0.000030319845,0.00090112526,0.4606141,0.0013513232,0.00036165162,0.3228974,0.2040795,0.000048462804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027764905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034803452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9902151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005910621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004898723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13222426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078865404","doi":"10.1002/tea.20246","title":"Erratum: Student affect and conceptual understanding in learning chemistry","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Acronym; Affect (linguistics); Conceptual change; Science education; Educational research; Mathematics education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Sociology; Chemistry; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.2738281009696439,"score_gpt":0.5379201879679727,"score_spread":0.2640920869983288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078865404","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012958145,0.0019981277,0.0008229781,0.11283992,0.87034935,0.000032476142,0.0011346812,0.00024875556,0.011277865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06641051,0.0135085825,0.010229528,0.18218698,0.20321082,0.0002981984,0.005318494,0.0021468175,0.5166901],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978096,0.0003032189,0.00039915266,0.00027701783,0.001100616,0.000110417626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97270095,0.010630009,0.00091258,0.0010984027,0.013949011,0.00070906547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003050415,0.0015214072,0.0012332345,0.0015689909,0.0036665727,0.0024482568,0.0021187004,0.0042780787,0.043007363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042681083,0.0006177005,0.00070485286,0.0014045675,0.0018215645,0.0022702417,0.0014057959,0.00669606,0.02044442],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027856926,0.0000131046545,0.0001272685,0.000049575967,0.0000039393904,0.00011779149,0.00006803018,0.000019969448,0.000028140763,0.0007119681,0.99274534,0.0060871122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059114518,0.00008633887,0.0038618469,0.000693371,0.0000627534,0.0012414266,0.00096794264,0.00045032104,0.0010064286,0.0034214233,0.98807496,0.00007412303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017818613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022239778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043007363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035376593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004936036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14387399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086427025","doi":"10.1002/tea.20412","title":"A study of laughter in science lessons","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Humor Studies and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Laughter; Seriousness; Phenomenon; Solidarity; Dialectic; Psychology; Complicity; Science class; Boredom; Curriculum; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Sociology; Science education; Social psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.47811673325523046,"score_gpt":0.6013513138150917,"score_spread":0.1232345805598612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086427025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99604887,0.00011683188,0.0007254893,0.00022519418,0.000020856007,0.000030395213,0.000022503178,0.000023273591,0.0027865297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969116,0.000119056196,0.0004700934,0.00013144143,0.000020241318,0.000035292494,0.000035126483,0.000020394606,0.0022569564],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786526,0.001074478,0.000071641465,0.00022535626,0.0004967651,0.0002665596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908833,0.005267406,0.0014184071,0.0006382049,0.0009080207,0.00088466326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001490314,0.00038384285,0.00081095315,0.0017104482,0.003387582,0.0027653817,0.0010148614,0.0013713111,0.0034246303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015162623,0.0004288913,0.00024932378,0.00069946016,0.003083226,0.0011592888,0.002836116,0.002052329,0.00073633593],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020377352,0.00044897114,0.05539419,0.0002598783,0.000034761117,0.0029367367,0.88525546,0.000101122074,0.026346086,0.0014275964,0.0016146346,0.025976766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003383919,0.0008915614,0.22454529,0.00031871212,0.000029160692,0.004453345,0.72800624,0.0009177386,0.0074909325,0.0018623142,0.031346273,0.00010458683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015784295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034221984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034246303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011586038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000548673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011456549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091134906","doi":"10.1002/tea.20160","title":"Proliferation of inscriptions and transformations among preservice science teachers engaged in authentic science","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Science education; Psychology; Observational study; Nature of Science; Pedagogy; Chemistry; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.18984485819606348,"score_gpt":0.5316515786277104,"score_spread":0.34180672043164695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091134906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99836427,0.00006799906,0.00040320613,0.00008119406,0.000004003462,0.0000110122455,0.0000046137607,0.00000862821,0.0010549006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978763,0.0001063746,0.00058238715,0.00002879139,0.0000045589277,0.000013940011,0.000019527322,0.0000073799956,0.0013608842],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99580485,0.001774409,0.00024544977,0.0005446003,0.0012875816,0.00034307622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97802734,0.009542544,0.0061021424,0.0024671373,0.0021660945,0.0016948108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041540656,0.0002646493,0.0004209914,0.0020263272,0.0023593686,0.0046371226,0.0011677109,0.0012126068,0.0026849767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02489058,0.00066758256,0.00029755564,0.00063851103,0.0040287357,0.0016242393,0.0042676753,0.0019944413,0.0004203876],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017682598,0.000565013,0.19104867,0.00014053592,0.00002596947,0.0011352382,0.73653936,0.0001295882,0.019552866,0.0016744877,0.0004902434,0.04852123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004496318,0.00078115705,0.24934177,0.00022590857,0.000040799285,0.0024117422,0.7168056,0.0011355638,0.0069135837,0.0025584777,0.01963584,0.00010457085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018433374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029526297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046371226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009612197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00125036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02196908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091496793","doi":"10.1002/tea.20169","title":"Student affect and conceptual understanding in learning chemistry","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Situational ethics; Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Chemistry; Chemistry education; Concept learning; Mathematics education; Feeling; Science education; Conceptual change; Cognition; Class (philosophy); Social psychology; Epistemology; Communication","score_opus":0.30360421365056633,"score_gpt":0.5717385533461283,"score_spread":0.268134339695562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091496793","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99892104,0.000032352644,0.00007360573,0.000016517875,0.0000029094424,0.0000039743322,0.000010961477,0.0000035516691,0.0009350859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993273,0.000046690613,0.00009143915,0.000011933609,0.0000031377447,0.000006560147,0.00002638971,0.0000014006135,0.00048522436],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994382,0.00017337684,0.00003449702,0.00006808916,0.00022074251,0.00006499921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99487704,0.0017869101,0.0017965867,0.000200894,0.0006395965,0.00069908233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009986402,0.00020738086,0.00026782296,0.00048559907,0.0003564303,0.0014346439,0.00018598019,0.00034473732,0.002692024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072855693,0.0001520181,0.000232542,0.00023474025,0.00040769824,0.00028361744,0.0005715357,0.00080765755,0.00035626043],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034113767,0.0011706072,0.95258737,0.00006351968,0.00010934701,0.000112748574,0.0074034585,0.0004524519,0.008388746,0.00034621797,0.0004514946,0.028572977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054128745,0.00021164298,0.99680907,0.000009051779,0.000016808466,0.000053853968,0.0012552347,0.0003923823,0.00071844575,0.00013458094,0.00038407452,0.000009439536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00092613645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001281181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002692024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003053364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001590271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009005666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093446643","doi":"10.1002/tea.10111","title":"Encouraging and analyzing student questions in a large physics course: Meaningful patterns for instructors","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Quarter (Canadian coin); Conceptual change; Concept learning; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Psychology; Science education; Variance (accounting); Conceptual framework; Mathematics; Sociology; Statistics","score_opus":0.16566097938181798,"score_gpt":0.5721715363524832,"score_spread":0.4065105569706652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093446643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99535924,0.00007992125,0.0032411462,0.00019010434,0.000009165388,0.000091618014,0.0000722527,0.000103335566,0.00085330463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903178,0.00009688014,0.007815175,0.00014300559,0.000025306486,0.00017394262,0.0003622732,0.000041672563,0.0010240452],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.990244,0.0062899026,0.0007182653,0.00095107977,0.001430044,0.00036673894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87169355,0.09569398,0.015195465,0.006443126,0.00818863,0.002785268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008141885,0.00044670078,0.00044596623,0.0018807477,0.00096259307,0.0019927174,0.0012442542,0.0014872376,0.0010169685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.107738264,0.00034197723,0.000303002,0.0015590948,0.0009284026,0.0013527683,0.0017840643,0.001110961,0.0005969176],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052072696,0.0012976788,0.68128,0.00038597055,0.00010310168,0.00061591814,0.06357523,0.00093889073,0.030200278,0.0006334087,0.003592533,0.21685612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000551833,0.0010526957,0.93166655,0.00018350578,0.00007518231,0.000991738,0.03132058,0.0079146,0.011607775,0.0030211292,0.011989176,0.00012180005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008819948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002095452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008141885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075569213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063866895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04305893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096609684","doi":"10.1002/tea.21158","title":"Science language<i>Wanted Alive</i>: Through the dialectical/dialogical lens of Vygotsky and the Bakhtin circle","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogical self; Sociocultural evolution; Dialectic; Epistemology; Relation (database); Framing (construction); Sociology; Premise; Science education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14879158420901992,"score_gpt":0.5328279719277582,"score_spread":0.38403638771873827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096609684","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15023491,0.022811737,0.18153572,0.15396586,0.0014865944,0.00023090231,0.00015006097,0.00033737038,0.4892468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98395306,0.0013270456,0.009199666,0.0012798711,0.00013473663,0.00014573395,0.000014248536,0.00005385301,0.0038917502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99064237,0.007828539,0.00014356716,0.00058183447,0.00049588707,0.00030780156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992343,0.0059431195,0.00048034595,0.00046266525,0.00041490688,0.00035589118],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00827479,0.00056872494,0.00054095924,0.002412415,0.00847147,0.012868538,0.0014080569,0.0037088292,0.002626805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063817925,0.00035085576,0.00049497373,0.0014681303,0.059351332,0.013058458,0.006890046,0.006699242,0.00039890627],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009141194,0.000011029645,0.00010274981,0.000031651507,0.0000025033999,0.000051084822,0.031418003,0.00014103115,0.00014059592,0.96581626,0.00059280795,0.0016830402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018583736,0.000021257,0.0002698898,0.00018679447,0.000007392452,0.00010855342,0.036018424,0.0012987423,0.0003951917,0.90432733,0.057326775,0.000021146197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040939795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024866469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9915285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008685185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056124763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06301576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110214764","doi":"10.1002/tea.20025","title":"Impact of a school district's science reform effort on the achievement and attitudes of third‐ and fourth‐grade students","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Supervisor; Curriculum; Psychology; Science education; Student achievement; Perception; School district; Academic achievement; Pedagogy; Political science","score_opus":0.21541150902367928,"score_gpt":0.5773881491558533,"score_spread":0.36197664013217407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110214764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99968576,0.000013567867,0.000011084907,0.000026230131,0.0000029402263,0.000004247936,0.000016845064,0.0000032176974,0.00023603516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99951136,0.000012791496,0.000031456504,0.000013553901,0.0000031196184,0.000008690063,0.000031418607,8.546834e-7,0.00038676333],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977622,0.0008737825,0.000104856146,0.00022577545,0.0005691459,0.00046416683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929569,0.0014781394,0.0017866761,0.00053766626,0.0008213656,0.0024192375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016731604,0.00021522546,0.00040898786,0.0007276371,0.0012616755,0.0017676777,0.00064347644,0.0004108648,0.003175898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004365527,0.00023696647,0.00048239727,0.0005521688,0.00072318123,0.0002747754,0.0015436021,0.00092025794,0.0004793169],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010529925,0.005242384,0.9579469,0.00007243011,0.00017686457,0.00015601964,0.00445486,0.0005311666,0.0048976545,0.0002946294,0.000925548,0.024248412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020865667,0.001056909,0.99479264,0.000006582432,0.000032466087,0.000015691177,0.0024079087,0.00013908488,0.00091952336,0.000015590864,0.00058507134,0.0000075391777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017068276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027385637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017068276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015495208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020100093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03393781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112973645","doi":"10.1002/tea.20271","title":"Written extended‐response questions as classroom assessment tools for meaningful understanding of evolutionary theory","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Schematic; Evolutionary theory; Mathematics education; Descriptive research; Computer science; Concept learning; Psychology; Science education; Knowledge level; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.40413621639738323,"score_gpt":0.5753339453363949,"score_spread":0.1711977289390117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112973645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9817706,0.00006666746,0.013165692,0.00036687026,0.000032029675,0.00065588887,0.00015798323,0.00010118326,0.0036831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795893,0.00006674638,0.017250538,0.0001158897,0.0000075941643,0.0011079939,0.00012996791,0.000029385514,0.0017026133],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97599936,0.019315813,0.0009993248,0.0010200227,0.0019159216,0.00074958126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83451384,0.14074655,0.0082195895,0.0032895938,0.011283338,0.0019471416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020148473,0.0006841179,0.00078609656,0.002063526,0.00071645185,0.0020530694,0.0017075455,0.0010357009,0.009421077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.115087494,0.0003899325,0.0003383379,0.0010369567,0.0021306064,0.003721461,0.0029399083,0.0014820866,0.001308387],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016136685,0.00467933,0.1013951,0.0028042465,0.00008373858,0.002099816,0.5412709,0.00291862,0.036134906,0.0071778367,0.0057223565,0.29409945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005545901,0.005940702,0.18591046,0.0031502838,0.00011397245,0.0017693026,0.67517185,0.02454189,0.04441665,0.015938407,0.04204193,0.00044994644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037071618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005303998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020148473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012239295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010080453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.106556594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117021117","doi":"10.1002/tea.21132","title":"Death discussion in science read‐alouds: Cognitive, sociolinguistic, and moral processes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognition; Action (physics); Think aloud protocol; Variety (cybernetics); Creatures; Cognitive science; Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Social psychology; Philosophy; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.11660845860474081,"score_gpt":0.46986737072684054,"score_spread":0.3532589121220997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117021117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98234946,0.00038298,0.006916346,0.0008279499,0.00004647437,0.00005422203,0.000025552947,0.00007274818,0.009324253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968746,0.00017800924,0.0016315181,0.00013372579,0.000013501061,0.00003835428,0.000021914384,0.000034281842,0.0010742203],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935575,0.0049624005,0.00015722346,0.00037810756,0.0006519479,0.00029291946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9715385,0.023230154,0.0025041779,0.000545516,0.0012467704,0.00093487767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055753603,0.0005493868,0.00048519953,0.001327459,0.002038175,0.0035949482,0.00095164124,0.0017929254,0.0033189624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0270337,0.00038292108,0.0003269609,0.000460719,0.0048029507,0.0039832178,0.0031532147,0.0028187234,0.00043845625],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013754329,0.0002774585,0.008203296,0.00031401266,0.000014943594,0.0005747026,0.96432567,0.00018013944,0.01094796,0.004651142,0.00044662243,0.00992653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077811936,0.00045928947,0.032831777,0.00063138275,0.000051192386,0.0013388826,0.90461737,0.0024661745,0.012220471,0.0146349035,0.030537786,0.00013301718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007779755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014663879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055753603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016776946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001102877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029485643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117962730","doi":"10.1002/tea.20153","title":"Concept maps: Experiments on dynamic thinking","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Header; Focus (optics); Concept map; Task (project management); Mathematics education; Computer science; Psychology; Engineering; Physics","score_opus":0.2020900081355763,"score_gpt":0.5848167688805302,"score_spread":0.38272676074495393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117962730","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9802406,0.00012382516,0.014124713,0.00017828372,0.00005609765,0.0009192042,0.000078759644,0.00010379719,0.0041747317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9684664,0.00014492095,0.027582722,0.00015787756,0.00003839536,0.002489599,0.00011833033,0.00005583584,0.0009458982],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930622,0.0041400976,0.00040094377,0.000884623,0.001150806,0.00036131532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7693543,0.21751857,0.0045460477,0.004984174,0.0021478967,0.0014491113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009208957,0.001088415,0.000635926,0.0008317628,0.00089589733,0.0017738069,0.0015563716,0.0011643725,0.0066478797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07727644,0.0008786299,0.0004853184,0.0009407633,0.0025807458,0.0039928243,0.0031201357,0.0025415656,0.0004761488],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.034165964,0.054486666,0.022541413,0.007065163,0.00059207523,0.0015396234,0.14895949,0.032362938,0.24115321,0.069058806,0.0046858895,0.38338885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02476692,0.075973876,0.08843316,0.002273154,0.0009762598,0.001651408,0.03181368,0.14614303,0.34918162,0.2315853,0.045917198,0.0012844361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004183737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023731489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009208957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078390667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000803989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04870224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122607195","doi":"10.1002/tea.20422","title":"Cultural diversity in science education through <i>Novelization</i>: Against the <i>Epicization</i> of science and cultural centralization","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Innovative Education and Learning Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Sociology; Science education; Unitary state; Cultural diversity; Face (sociological concept); Globalization; Epistemology; Social science; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Psychology; Anthropology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2730437705535902,"score_gpt":0.5127122237696398,"score_spread":0.23966845321604957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122607195","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5533533,0.003204289,0.05212084,0.045973726,0.0008619367,0.00016037082,0.00003328592,0.00018205891,0.34411016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921136,0.00037377607,0.0032952859,0.0006828483,0.000070309856,0.000036354235,0.0000067434307,0.00002968621,0.0033914652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.990575,0.0075336113,0.0001892375,0.0004659304,0.00073414337,0.00050202187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98722166,0.008342521,0.0013694722,0.0017202193,0.00074913213,0.00059694215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013696092,0.0005319362,0.00045842846,0.0014466343,0.010606356,0.013297792,0.0013223548,0.002035303,0.0032943834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010681803,0.0003103083,0.0004817188,0.0009526699,0.06122157,0.012723211,0.014036017,0.0045802277,0.0002653717],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057034875,0.000079554695,0.001161048,0.00014340236,0.000010563419,0.00039304144,0.41007686,0.00033243044,0.0010604785,0.57093555,0.0020570657,0.0136930095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059108374,0.0001488492,0.0016689718,0.0005521528,0.000034450557,0.0014883465,0.35524952,0.0018595924,0.0037469158,0.41912243,0.21599649,0.00007316751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008538959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001156147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013696092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037178067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028871929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0724327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147442928","doi":"10.1002/tea.1040","title":"Learning to teach science in urban schools","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":154,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Sociology; Teacher education; Professional development; Ethnography; Teaching method; Psychology","score_opus":0.09133853791712378,"score_gpt":0.49926919141250153,"score_spread":0.40793065349537777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147442928","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97898346,0.00023052086,0.0011063735,0.0017518449,0.00002688348,0.00007452522,0.000016988182,0.000030622825,0.017778836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911487,0.0003202464,0.001842384,0.0002969941,0.000014955772,0.00005552071,0.00002823308,0.000007919616,0.006284917],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784195,0.001137802,0.000048178903,0.00016587682,0.00017881762,0.0006274154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972938,0.0007104839,0.00039453618,0.00014465037,0.00019736774,0.0012591478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029049404,0.00027104115,0.00037513324,0.0010558576,0.011176714,0.0032708098,0.00073990424,0.00084360683,0.006390703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026209897,0.00036214426,0.0002763839,0.00076153624,0.0046958933,0.001711507,0.0061325994,0.0013317246,0.0010004629],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018732477,0.0039519286,0.07866569,0.00045378596,0.000020168061,0.0016167867,0.74888664,0.0010049848,0.003578673,0.025585907,0.0153348,0.120713234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011852057,0.0013630978,0.049248736,0.00034888825,0.00002605255,0.000626354,0.7445659,0.0007774574,0.0037202933,0.012954374,0.18620543,0.000044926855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004721057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02295006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011176714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026165545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005758968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021378994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147458616","doi":"10.1002/tea.20352","title":"To be or not to be? Discursive resources for (Dis‐)identifying with science‐related careers","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Formative assessment; Performative utterance; Science education; Discourse analysis; Pedagogy; Sociology; Discursive psychology; Psychology; Mathematics education; Epistemology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.16869427959641264,"score_gpt":0.4646931946023418,"score_spread":0.2959989150059292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147458616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87689984,0.001581834,0.025802296,0.020768957,0.00021510254,0.00013225077,0.000075080636,0.00009091916,0.074433796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99522406,0.0002748273,0.0028690493,0.00022019529,0.000023730796,0.000043714932,0.00002427975,0.000028604063,0.0012916318],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9708284,0.024690902,0.00074589223,0.00073803484,0.0019784383,0.0010182963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9416792,0.04370804,0.0056083375,0.002872371,0.0039552944,0.0021767868],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024080522,0.00069657114,0.00046521175,0.0049589896,0.012330977,0.009644226,0.0018923105,0.0023104951,0.0027154116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05736159,0.0005527217,0.00045893676,0.0021293447,0.023079157,0.009832761,0.008092888,0.0033107921,0.0004946176],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003890183,0.000024878467,0.0039825616,0.000095783274,0.000005625926,0.00035871644,0.9478754,0.00005661722,0.0010225875,0.037754897,0.0006434864,0.008140604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067015017,0.000019103694,0.0020506242,0.0002874273,0.000009331394,0.00030128326,0.9607891,0.00050784304,0.0007204776,0.01502587,0.020258995,0.000023356613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031539176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038186368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98766905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004047789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004814107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12735152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148398013","doi":"10.1002/tea.21078","title":"Interpreting Student Views of Learning Experiences in a Contextualized Science Discourse in Kenya","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Kenya; Pedagogy; Science education; Mathematics education; Kali; Sociology; Nature of Science; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.23544101660320563,"score_gpt":0.6104382556159458,"score_spread":0.3749972390127402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148398013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941327,0.00025168576,0.00035900806,0.0007390538,0.000014030717,0.000028408638,0.000021263011,0.0000039105244,0.004449968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984837,0.0003038445,0.0001864776,0.00011299312,0.0000042080283,0.000021119527,0.000011990392,0.0000047922404,0.0008708804],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963613,0.002371312,0.00016585704,0.00022784411,0.00038323423,0.0004904242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955017,0.0031051817,0.0006407373,0.00012408916,0.00031098048,0.00031741688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005010572,0.00057028746,0.0005988126,0.0017323154,0.009887723,0.0057476438,0.0009191915,0.002000659,0.002671603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005831133,0.0005021608,0.0002308921,0.0018242039,0.011628104,0.004336144,0.004631399,0.0025111267,0.00033932817],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015897904,0.000017461482,0.001929309,0.00003870469,0.0000020493396,0.00051896996,0.99433595,0.0000313519,0.0009704608,0.0009359968,0.00008243931,0.0011213189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025766942,0.000021210686,0.0016971892,0.00008612156,0.0000035662572,0.00015131476,0.9930321,0.00006780019,0.00041346825,0.00026658626,0.004246393,0.000011654552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011268263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02208857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011268263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005089097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032727476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036924183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151170333","doi":"10.1002/tea.10071","title":"Theoretical perspectives on learning in an informal setting","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Museums and Cultural Heritage","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":227,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Formative assessment; Constructivist teaching methods; Informal learning; Constructivism (international relations); Mathematics education; Interpretation (philosophy); Psychology; Class (philosophy); Restructuring; Knowledge base; Concept map; Pedagogy; Teaching method; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.09026530449468509,"score_gpt":0.4106018060777642,"score_spread":0.32033650158307914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151170333","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1396682,0.0083582485,0.13274552,0.033025626,0.0004928602,0.0003119076,0.00019091548,0.00015739244,0.68504936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823088,0.0016463074,0.0070701065,0.0008966889,0.00021529257,0.00023611283,0.000071994684,0.00002310055,0.0075315605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916089,0.006284241,0.00020053372,0.0005295996,0.000777653,0.0005990823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889263,0.0078061842,0.0008842744,0.0006444372,0.0006725656,0.0010661829],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054780664,0.00083316164,0.00040758692,0.003773296,0.0047352877,0.010535691,0.0024486354,0.0030617001,0.009681964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006388421,0.00030031902,0.00063463213,0.002229133,0.03831448,0.010660534,0.0062031616,0.003464851,0.00076602737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064926508,0.000034681623,0.00039962376,0.00008162499,0.0000036290733,0.00020918826,0.020083137,0.00044662508,0.000041041003,0.9755874,0.00041795702,0.0026885564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002759121,0.000044478875,0.00043140407,0.00037649844,0.000006473678,0.0002964355,0.040719654,0.0023045726,0.00010987629,0.91220975,0.04345898,0.000014223069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003063906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017216443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010535691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006541202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025968628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04746002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151323772","doi":"10.1002/tea.10109","title":"The value of an emergent notion of authenticity: Examples from two student/teacher–scientist partnership programs","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Curriculum; General partnership; Science education; Value (mathematics); Property (philosophy); Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Face (sociological concept); Epistemology; Norm (philosophy); Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Social science; Political science","score_opus":0.34853020034477866,"score_gpt":0.5852288606081715,"score_spread":0.2366986602633928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151323772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90384245,0.0002037722,0.025366677,0.00650589,0.00010009002,0.00031096154,0.000034203404,0.00012629502,0.06350967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989922,0.00010737386,0.0048286966,0.0002212089,0.000015460384,0.0002071419,0.000028076496,0.000037562768,0.004632543],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98754984,0.0088073965,0.00020542963,0.00060665846,0.0014481603,0.0013825455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98654234,0.0059791515,0.00086800766,0.0014504916,0.0010956458,0.004064388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008699669,0.00033359506,0.0004932755,0.0010291566,0.014144041,0.005195901,0.0021826853,0.002860511,0.0038685054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01808631,0.0003415709,0.0005055168,0.0010017243,0.008269611,0.0049287574,0.016913472,0.004817798,0.0007500434],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046595186,0.004027086,0.01867293,0.0003029206,0.000041660307,0.00729498,0.648662,0.0030033952,0.0036671178,0.22204818,0.0072570825,0.08455677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040290976,0.0017902259,0.013478249,0.00027157506,0.00004559983,0.0044358643,0.52241796,0.014657641,0.010066186,0.1486774,0.28360862,0.0001478159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018761007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002978177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014144041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002328993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041255434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046008825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153579845","doi":"10.1002/tea.10018","title":"Lessons on and from the dihybrid cross: An activity–theoretical study of learning in coteaching","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Reflective Practices in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Psychology; Mathematics education; Subject matter; Subject (documents); Teaching method; Pedagogy; Epistemology; Curriculum; Computer science","score_opus":0.2406407258679001,"score_gpt":0.5956801122643562,"score_spread":0.35503938639645616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153579845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9796703,0.00014487452,0.0028787146,0.001144663,0.00002005395,0.000060201026,0.000011940414,0.000020121923,0.016049093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99362963,0.00015773199,0.0018046375,0.00021686556,0.0000054926854,0.000039284172,0.000015848706,0.000020061674,0.0041103903],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958901,0.0031373804,0.0000678704,0.0003398304,0.00022479739,0.0003399474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99274665,0.0047997204,0.0004096089,0.00056985015,0.00031485542,0.0011593506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061166673,0.00066156505,0.00064456597,0.001207482,0.008496552,0.0055935704,0.0019441665,0.001854689,0.0048322114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010360409,0.00047591014,0.00027502127,0.00085098075,0.011372153,0.005421176,0.008051855,0.00398982,0.0004988479],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071558745,0.0008143382,0.00576551,0.000078401914,0.0000083012565,0.0010707888,0.9511837,0.00028444742,0.0014479754,0.02185275,0.0011445006,0.016277792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003966023,0.000511573,0.009571006,0.00019343542,0.00001851838,0.00065916794,0.93125033,0.0015367519,0.0020151208,0.014597235,0.03956116,0.00004594744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056454893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0124741765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008496552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029770785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015771744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032348454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169310428","doi":"10.1002/tea.20008","title":"Scientists' views of science, models of writing, and science writing practices","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":167,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Scientific writing; Professional writing; Science education; Science communication; Ambiguity; Perception; Scientific literacy; Technical writing; Science, technology, society and environment education; Sociology; Nature of Science; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Mathematics education; Computer science; Higher education; Political science; Engineering; Linguistics","score_opus":0.2310648360709079,"score_gpt":0.4966819380656629,"score_spread":0.265617101994755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169310428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97898257,0.00044086087,0.00096391264,0.0020383685,0.000017602273,0.000021386804,0.000013087912,0.000009961584,0.017512277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988224,0.00020095763,0.00017042401,0.00006884637,0.000006342464,0.000008831028,0.000007046473,0.0000028011564,0.0007124363],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9819666,0.010408901,0.0008467684,0.0006106325,0.0051792106,0.0009878491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.935364,0.045047145,0.008228431,0.0013839141,0.0071177525,0.002858795],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021288618,0.00036810682,0.00043253973,0.0055867294,0.0084026735,0.014043819,0.0010517465,0.0016840196,0.0015422138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06133306,0.0003459225,0.00030286654,0.0027250058,0.018468695,0.0036338158,0.003262772,0.0022511403,0.00019455678],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051411822,0.00004757783,0.021201858,0.00006037941,0.000011561192,0.0001838698,0.9590606,0.00019704783,0.0012330575,0.009815895,0.00028631982,0.007850406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028247718,0.0000744797,0.025745193,0.0001971026,0.000025222758,0.00022773904,0.951056,0.000968572,0.0009446915,0.00907657,0.011604611,0.000051545627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07474282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06466067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99159735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012882744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014228677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14861554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324169338","doi":"10.1002/tea.21318","title":"Visualizing biological data in museums: Visitor learning with an interactive tree of life exhibit","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Animal and Plant Science Education","field":"Psychology","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Visitor pattern; Gesture; Tree (set theory); Visualization; Baseline (sea); Computer science; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Human–computer interaction; Artificial intelligence; Biology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.29702353948145593,"score_gpt":0.5375220269685731,"score_spread":0.24049848748711716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324169338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949831,0.00008153678,0.0022424797,0.00012555387,0.0000048157863,0.00005102232,0.000059015245,0.00009650402,0.0023558915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892742,0.00015942921,0.009043369,0.000069983515,0.000011153442,0.00010503225,0.00014472446,0.000023143903,0.0011689398],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977863,0.0014542402,0.000058712445,0.00023214004,0.00020075301,0.00026777826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946733,0.0029435027,0.0006782089,0.00045989928,0.0001934315,0.0010516413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024631862,0.00055822823,0.00041777967,0.0006353826,0.0008644357,0.0026295371,0.0012573346,0.00082504563,0.005009277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007461866,0.0003243601,0.00074446626,0.0003888651,0.0009648734,0.001591623,0.0034655225,0.0007890392,0.00079329585],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011169171,0.004538334,0.50553393,0.0011273785,0.00036867868,0.0035118575,0.2704387,0.0027499637,0.02506728,0.0015063226,0.00703111,0.17700952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002622097,0.009110767,0.5272443,0.000670814,0.00040436958,0.0051391176,0.36686486,0.011703939,0.0112095615,0.0033070715,0.06375385,0.00032903385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010359866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028363748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005009277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004649635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045398623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016757667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328888181","doi":"10.1002/tea.21319","title":"Exemplification in science instruction: Teaching and learning through examples","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Exemplification; Argumentation theory; Scientific literacy; Mathematics education; Conceptual change; Science education; Concept learning; Psychology; Generalization; Reading (process); Nature of Science; Computer science; Pedagogy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.18838735983687666,"score_gpt":0.515397402302112,"score_spread":0.3270100424652353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328888181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83396673,0.0041375784,0.10847597,0.0027556564,0.00012021081,0.00034266498,0.000040984825,0.00021198858,0.049948175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90744615,0.0021099825,0.08708911,0.00020594045,0.000037344435,0.00019418736,0.000043675056,0.000042609165,0.00283104],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.994325,0.004310722,0.00012560743,0.0003125294,0.0007287666,0.00019736678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863955,0.011136423,0.00085908914,0.00088159094,0.00036513284,0.00036227616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042827306,0.00039620072,0.00036172848,0.00088123954,0.0010896007,0.0028404978,0.0013891225,0.0013487552,0.002493131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022484887,0.0002765903,0.00033513154,0.00062964606,0.0037115507,0.003463478,0.0037099854,0.0014616234,0.00041793124],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041297803,0.0017322525,0.02164842,0.0020898362,0.00006730349,0.0023814796,0.21018244,0.00423115,0.024173947,0.09053809,0.004012579,0.63852954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030780595,0.0038538375,0.060503017,0.006522345,0.00024626107,0.014816347,0.18853143,0.024724957,0.057822306,0.33116588,0.31111714,0.00038875546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004103649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006726339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042827306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000672264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089087506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022649527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604565736","doi":"10.1002/tea.21396","title":"Toward a durable prevalence of scientific conceptions: Tracking the effects of two interfering misconceptions about buoyancy from preschoolers to science teachers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Scientific misconceptions; Conceptual change; Task (project management); Science education; Psychology; Mathematics education; Concept learning; Tracking (education); Cognition; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Scientific literacy; Pedagogy; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.2339594008709526,"score_gpt":0.547832849953404,"score_spread":0.3138734490824514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604565736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995011,0.00002311142,0.00012636768,0.000018813585,9.239993e-7,0.000004618979,0.000009748473,0.00000634321,0.00030895945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994168,0.000028907592,0.00031343978,0.000012264385,0.0000016005258,0.00001433841,0.00003368121,0.000004291218,0.00017462413],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759704,0.00074634654,0.00017351024,0.0004532276,0.00073048414,0.00029937286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95085216,0.030467931,0.010855131,0.002353793,0.0034425461,0.0020284231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003839794,0.0003698986,0.00053383684,0.001866878,0.0008438037,0.002585156,0.0006567983,0.00088952726,0.0018121663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047716863,0.00056476623,0.0002616125,0.00045558467,0.0016353772,0.001154252,0.0025087832,0.0016133039,0.00022695486],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011495985,0.001037265,0.88551337,0.00013132057,0.00008809949,0.00034269548,0.06326463,0.00020282727,0.026191728,0.00034060405,0.00015226756,0.021585649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001218461,0.0005013743,0.9822451,0.000020987405,0.000034626013,0.00021700203,0.011817543,0.0005509708,0.0039292104,0.00025387874,0.00039059695,0.000026436004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059535126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00394158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059535126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008030969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007400453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020307004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768667567","doi":"10.1002/tea.21430","title":"The influence of instruction, prior knowledge, and values on climate change risk perception among undergraduates","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Perception; Psychology; Risk perception; Sample (material); Knowledge level; Social psychology; Mathematics education; Ecology","score_opus":0.47000331486140556,"score_gpt":0.5695468158969711,"score_spread":0.09954350103556553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768667567","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99972194,0.000017115002,0.000013181152,0.000018957051,0.0000017062908,0.0000028382867,0.000007683719,8.2799966e-7,0.00021587462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99977213,0.000015914653,0.000024633868,0.000011597662,0.0000023557789,0.0000028574302,0.000014089278,5.7306653e-7,0.00015581962],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884975,0.00029173755,0.00007612577,0.00011147574,0.000449657,0.00022128431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895712,0.0038678516,0.0023163287,0.00036680867,0.0010057207,0.0028719748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015263255,0.00021238394,0.0003068545,0.0008454545,0.00059249846,0.001645293,0.00030896926,0.00048008942,0.0032677304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010188943,0.00023136302,0.0003156574,0.00041907045,0.0005860466,0.00041067819,0.0007129184,0.00086798595,0.00035723293],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011034357,0.0010369092,0.98882306,0.000010290934,0.000022496297,0.000057149322,0.002910518,0.000041096897,0.00079359143,0.000042270683,0.000089113506,0.0060632504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038724825,0.00027823134,0.9964224,0.000007864158,0.000009201581,0.000029370623,0.0026255096,0.00019177988,0.00023704747,0.00003687016,0.00015210282,0.0000056925874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006570387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009136864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006570387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005312752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006020083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013064325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768850143","doi":"10.1002/tea.21425","title":"The contribution of science‐rich resources to public science interest","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"TheMuseum","funders":"","keywords":"Science education; Psychology; Diversity (politics); Metropolitan area; Demographics; Perception; Cognition; Social psychology; Demography; Sociology; Geography; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.7513706013868204,"score_gpt":0.6362287240479799,"score_spread":0.11514187733884051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768850143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967801,0.000090874935,0.00009236942,0.00019004956,0.000003015721,0.000008466772,0.00011700788,0.0000030787453,0.0027151948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995988,0.000047280555,0.00006775837,0.000014739496,0.000004332387,0.000003890388,0.000052556723,0.0000011017238,0.0002095939],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990024,0.00045297816,0.00005756961,0.00013839197,0.0001830534,0.00016568089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9785769,0.011121941,0.0059263012,0.0011175692,0.00096834294,0.0022888535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011487993,0.00016967798,0.00019321279,0.0008123473,0.0005801547,0.001589222,0.00046056046,0.0004210401,0.0060307574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011847498,0.0001935351,0.00039101686,0.0008198489,0.0007767788,0.00076559937,0.0016415062,0.00084760773,0.0002652485],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003363382,0.00013734674,0.9954934,0.000011347241,0.00003360887,0.000060882656,0.0005940293,0.00006871363,0.00009743709,0.00038713246,0.00009745494,0.002984908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002754615,0.00003241246,0.997551,0.000012003916,0.000023210889,0.00007798507,0.0012343238,0.00023617601,0.00009511673,0.00022236568,0.00050921907,0.0000033658287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007626015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011319083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007626015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060820894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000777129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02017492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895256255","doi":"10.1002/tea.21467","title":"Individual and collective agencies in China's curriculum reform: A case of physics teachers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Agency (philosophy); Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Context (archaeology); Negotiation; Professional development; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.2382011090146312,"score_gpt":0.5218439405786254,"score_spread":0.28364283156399417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895256255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98771995,0.000085549014,0.00077904074,0.0027361393,0.000019558614,0.000049202437,0.000007383128,0.000013238854,0.008589892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997024,0.000049600207,0.00028686982,0.00011964799,0.000008224223,0.00002283204,0.0000044598146,0.0000044287135,0.0024800284],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99230826,0.0040282854,0.00021784201,0.00056009856,0.00082745,0.002057965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959038,0.0014786997,0.0006644174,0.00034914192,0.00028882714,0.0013151985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053482587,0.00036234938,0.0005577028,0.0017707725,0.023769816,0.0047116764,0.0016225475,0.0031100963,0.0031233726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006665903,0.00053292833,0.0004950921,0.0018355253,0.0150017915,0.0032100286,0.0064789043,0.0032162978,0.00025203096],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003834964,0.00019211812,0.019139037,0.000054322438,0.000011884425,0.007828861,0.9435943,0.0004973921,0.000884299,0.017098818,0.0012052677,0.009455376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000310226,0.000076325596,0.014210756,0.00005661979,0.000019936257,0.0006277049,0.94692546,0.0013647198,0.0005135797,0.002173583,0.03396833,0.00003204108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10718305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13667887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10718305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017227514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012339371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21311831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897423990","doi":"10.1002/tea.21523","title":"Evaluating the effects of analogy enriched text on the learning of science: The importance of learning indexes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Education and Early Childhood Development","funders":"Sixth Framework Programme; European Commission","keywords":"Analogy; Conceptual change; Reading (process); Concept learning; Psychology; Test (biology); Mathematics education; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Epistemology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2132627396254807,"score_gpt":0.5610157559815953,"score_spread":0.34775301635611455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897423990","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978047,0.000080927755,0.0008807958,0.000022273605,0.0000118084245,0.00012192965,0.000021429165,0.000019885796,0.0010362872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940481,0.000110235254,0.005047179,0.000022614653,0.000018610823,0.00024808774,0.00004718646,0.000012575408,0.00044528366],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99573743,0.002041088,0.0005801206,0.00040830247,0.0010954755,0.0001375414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8850041,0.10039959,0.007835434,0.0025073306,0.0024964612,0.0017570278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004230818,0.0006042401,0.0007522434,0.0008842128,0.00024649053,0.0013429219,0.00055764883,0.000656208,0.003234075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0537829,0.00024123165,0.00053035835,0.00053832645,0.00065268,0.0015349976,0.0012371818,0.000780073,0.00025661616],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.057519794,0.03564311,0.14334166,0.005194696,0.0010099789,0.00084227824,0.01366594,0.0050683133,0.2242873,0.0017567633,0.0006506729,0.51101947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023690437,0.08731827,0.71525466,0.0004622346,0.002169118,0.00039843656,0.0033497296,0.010267703,0.17124705,0.0034500184,0.0034995622,0.00021421089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001869363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029994358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004230818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003734635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034492998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022374928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962744571","doi":"10.1002/tea.21586","title":"An online categorization task to investigate changes in students' interpretations of organic chemistry reactions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Categorization; Curriculum; Set (abstract data type); Chemistry; Task (project management); Mathematics education; Reactivity (psychology); Psychology; Concept learning; Computer science; Pedagogy; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.16946401834738847,"score_gpt":0.5505185873432168,"score_spread":0.38105456899582835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2962744571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950128,0.000024840017,0.0026733426,0.00003688375,0.000026799946,0.000187413,0.00021811166,0.00006328631,0.0017564759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884503,0.000040342493,0.00784395,0.00009171569,0.00001778987,0.00069255894,0.0005047135,0.000026813505,0.002331806],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750936,0.00079759344,0.00019741719,0.00065794936,0.00059874356,0.0002389475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96294403,0.024186425,0.0056473664,0.002881521,0.0026034084,0.001737192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034718188,0.0008454376,0.0008176496,0.0011239509,0.00061109214,0.0021541857,0.0012675474,0.0013423727,0.0056437277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03290388,0.00036603483,0.0004701949,0.0007931462,0.00059729576,0.0025266996,0.0017014132,0.0019851793,0.0011514155],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0054699956,0.0311083,0.38624743,0.001122572,0.00030479985,0.0006427334,0.06931824,0.0053873486,0.17456251,0.003992747,0.005999199,0.31584418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008277429,0.0122321285,0.8654647,0.00021111016,0.00016004272,0.00029189073,0.02684766,0.029564073,0.040991705,0.0070412043,0.015883196,0.00048444673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008891654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012630551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056437277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005949884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056738243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018880129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118200454","doi":"10.1002/tea.21678","title":"Editors' report: Reflections for the <i>Journal of Research in Science Teaching</i> (2015–2020)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; University of Massachusetts Boston; Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey; University of Missouri; University of Montana; Syracuse University","keywords":"Science education; Mathematics education; Educational research; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.4180721690196503,"score_gpt":0.6376624201663403,"score_spread":0.21959025114669006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118200454","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005214151,0.0034908592,0.0005622442,0.5769933,0.4129626,0.00008067182,0.0008443534,0.00033193058,0.0042126295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008614364,0.00892457,0.005192239,0.6575936,0.2580872,0.0005500767,0.0017127976,0.0008952794,0.058429852],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9526887,0.0060728504,0.004089998,0.003748357,0.027172182,0.0062279347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77218777,0.038793206,0.0150650805,0.006224201,0.094557784,0.07317195],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.079130925,0.0020814787,0.0016384419,0.0035199097,0.0081589725,0.034810815,0.0070103947,0.025200784,0.026152574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17342094,0.00125744,0.003568379,0.003002845,0.0053035268,0.016575089,0.009090237,0.034069736,0.02598194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031105028,0.0000319576,0.00022082288,0.00011429339,0.000007905099,0.00006511322,0.00014782963,0.00002787434,0.00006885819,0.0011076828,0.9930988,0.0050778342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027182057,0.000054718625,0.0008730005,0.00028833546,0.0000201132,0.000090156755,0.00051210896,0.00007278668,0.00018539019,0.0010507063,0.99677175,0.000053752257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074538314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012944571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92086905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077039246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049202498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41848934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163486026","doi":"10.1002/tea.21695","title":"“Anybody can do science if they're brave enough”: Understanding the role of science capital in science majors' identity trajectories into and through postsecondary science","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Career Development and Diversity","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Science education; Identity (music); Outreach; Science communication; Science, technology, society and environment education; Social science education; Sociology; Outline of social science; Capital (architecture); Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07774665484752874,"score_gpt":0.41450979269619165,"score_spread":0.3367631378486629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163486026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.991787,0.00015593655,0.0010135781,0.0016623242,0.000020549447,0.000011141482,0.000018754306,0.000007104639,0.00532357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99885094,0.00011416789,0.00020819882,0.00013725569,0.000004168714,0.000009749891,0.000018332428,0.000004529829,0.00065270916],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996979,0.0015655007,0.000070415255,0.00026555287,0.0004651522,0.00065444194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925729,0.0027182985,0.001441875,0.00042489354,0.0006174847,0.0022244535],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005840739,0.0002780458,0.00033050292,0.0011564074,0.00686848,0.007972287,0.0012211488,0.001008031,0.003554216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010468983,0.0002612536,0.00028148634,0.0008393211,0.010859153,0.0073302584,0.008040069,0.0028648637,0.0003514572],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007402024,0.00016266535,0.05007639,0.000062002604,0.00001351693,0.00041243836,0.9119681,0.00011269583,0.001056823,0.016104685,0.0011675672,0.018789154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005799968,0.00007982136,0.027034618,0.00008171684,0.000008316743,0.00016157424,0.95119494,0.00033572447,0.0005330239,0.0062526115,0.014285295,0.000026676953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009579691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017160544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9931315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037250482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049660252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030889094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164786649","doi":"10.1002/tea.21714","title":"Science engagement as insight into the science identity work nurtured in community‐based science clubs","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Club; Enthusiasm; Science education; Context (archaeology); Identity (music); Psychology; Pedagogy; Sociology; Social psychology; Medicine; Geography","score_opus":0.346290947944668,"score_gpt":0.5952801136289666,"score_spread":0.24898916568429857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164786649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9596914,0.0006928709,0.0034867008,0.0028145963,0.00015732953,0.00010158762,0.0000946416,0.00006292231,0.03289798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99586546,0.00030470308,0.0012380683,0.00024465445,0.000023444027,0.00007050679,0.00004421751,0.00003609328,0.0021729532],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888287,0.0074600843,0.00018619421,0.00068825274,0.0012963164,0.0015403669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875838,0.0063411226,0.0012927529,0.00063920126,0.0010977035,0.003045381],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008329163,0.0007303739,0.00069815153,0.0031143525,0.017316405,0.010614491,0.00258545,0.0021344612,0.0034954704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010670255,0.000621095,0.0007058417,0.0014932866,0.02064299,0.0045181494,0.01716373,0.004814514,0.00040617428],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018112354,0.000050713228,0.0053638965,0.000060137758,0.0000053723993,0.0009599389,0.98686856,0.00003536905,0.00048132188,0.0023919744,0.00057573157,0.003188822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048287125,0.000033983164,0.0062759123,0.0001086289,0.000005757022,0.0004931724,0.9699822,0.00009015,0.00025427094,0.0011423884,0.021590626,0.000017944334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022336036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0556686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9826836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068637747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066259145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049800396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232749568","doi":"10.1002/tea.21184","title":"Issue Information","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Educational Practices and Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Library science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.2900696946960087,"score_gpt":0.5984484644482622,"score_spread":0.3083787697522535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232749568","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003581257,0.0005068457,0.00093596533,0.0018915179,0.0064370856,0.00042685162,0.025188655,0.0021165267,0.9621385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009030951,0.00023392346,0.00034014895,0.00041254383,0.00052985444,0.000110169225,0.0072082435,0.00046246007,0.9897995],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987424,0.00016137424,0.00009085537,0.00017183277,0.0007147501,0.00011881074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949161,0.0008847083,0.0002387148,0.000533231,0.0020758752,0.0013513324],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017795728,0.0010393601,0.0011780709,0.0051341476,0.0015258073,0.00713758,0.0016442945,0.0018888805,0.92251575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010963449,0.0005120699,0.00071725185,0.0043789614,0.00070358475,0.003833771,0.0027231537,0.0017209568,0.8236751],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017964516,0.000027600088,0.000064509055,0.00017621394,0.0000013791505,0.000011990858,0.000018961973,0.00003251896,0.00007958401,0.002333357,0.96444285,0.03279315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020075364,0.000019080107,0.00037049287,0.00010650517,0.0000016587022,0.000018732471,0.000046717898,0.00007831069,0.00008042008,0.0015461065,0.9977062,0.000005666654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022136571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004597216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92251575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012537559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032634388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11052179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236520640","doi":"10.1002/tea.21448","title":"Issue Information","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Information retrieval; Library science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.15107893287506258,"score_gpt":0.3917977804189803,"score_spread":0.2407188475439177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236520640","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002984499,0.0007920411,0.0006639909,0.00396087,0.0152431205,0.00037888737,0.034719512,0.003290517,0.94065255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007133217,0.00036336752,0.00022796499,0.0006830779,0.0018350102,0.00010073834,0.010213389,0.00069157284,0.9851715],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986224,0.00017938724,0.00008775104,0.0002053453,0.000705467,0.00019963503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99379116,0.00086396176,0.00030280757,0.0005998221,0.0022388175,0.0022033995],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014646113,0.0021881952,0.0017791094,0.0042527206,0.002289737,0.010418757,0.0023616932,0.0030892028,0.9548053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00949805,0.0006742956,0.0010173459,0.0042280788,0.0007770257,0.005353083,0.0029921702,0.0027175043,0.9285755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018167426,0.000018155804,0.000028485047,0.00009014975,0.0000010588435,0.000008272665,0.000004289572,0.000026703345,0.000038051756,0.00039369334,0.9854057,0.0139672225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038956667,0.000022782679,0.0003226449,0.00014126167,0.0000019078668,0.000016350434,0.000025046085,0.00009817898,0.00006816736,0.000987848,0.99827003,0.0000068764834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033798828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064785266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045194685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020828776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029833168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06446475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238494294","doi":"10.1002/tea.21463","title":"Issue Information","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Library science; World Wide Web; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.15107893287506258,"score_gpt":0.3917977804189803,"score_spread":0.2407188475439177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238494294","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002984499,0.0007920411,0.0006639909,0.00396087,0.0152431205,0.00037888737,0.034719512,0.003290517,0.94065255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007133217,0.00036336752,0.00022796499,0.0006830779,0.0018350102,0.00010073834,0.010213389,0.00069157284,0.9851715],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986224,0.00017938724,0.00008775104,0.0002053453,0.000705467,0.00019963503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99379116,0.00086396176,0.00030280757,0.0005998221,0.0022388175,0.0022033995],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014646113,0.0021881952,0.0017791094,0.0042527206,0.002289737,0.010418757,0.0023616932,0.0030892028,0.9548053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00949805,0.0006742956,0.0010173459,0.0042280788,0.0007770257,0.005353083,0.0029921702,0.0027175043,0.9285755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018167426,0.000018155804,0.000028485047,0.00009014975,0.0000010588435,0.000008272665,0.000004289572,0.000026703345,0.000038051756,0.00039369334,0.9854057,0.0139672225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038956667,0.000022782679,0.0003226449,0.00014126167,0.0000019078668,0.000016350434,0.000025046085,0.00009817898,0.00006816736,0.000987848,0.99827003,0.0000068764834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033798828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064785266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045194685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020828776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029833168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06446475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280642105","doi":"10.1002/tea.21778","title":"Gender representation and academic achievement among <scp>STEM‐interested</scp> students in college <scp>STEM</scp> courses","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Career Development and Diversity","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; Raikes Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Graduation (instrument); Representation (politics); Mathematics education; Psychology; Academic achievement; Gender gap; Women in science; Mathematics; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.19342014989259082,"score_gpt":0.4656698606519581,"score_spread":0.27224971075936727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280642105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995474,0.000028305272,0.000016295591,0.000037450864,0.000002646399,0.00000147389,0.000024839397,7.358442e-7,0.00034089255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997116,0.00001962636,0.000006847226,0.000015416768,0.00000383828,0.0000012663944,0.00002540327,7.5598376e-7,0.00021520126],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995591,0.00009562521,0.000028792732,0.000073463554,0.00011044373,0.00013254752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980495,0.00031930726,0.0007429116,0.00006626268,0.00014814326,0.0006739483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074495375,0.00011851022,0.0002205683,0.0008902691,0.0007160679,0.0009442641,0.00026358716,0.00026208884,0.0027362786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036607927,0.0001072452,0.00017665146,0.00057868246,0.0005051481,0.0005933337,0.0010300104,0.00042961125,0.00044563686],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047401994,0.00006899797,0.99459684,0.0000043702903,0.000012780761,0.000036920406,0.0013481792,0.00002079956,0.00024293589,0.00010887096,0.0001448252,0.0033670252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002215655,0.00007192754,0.9965917,0.000005915997,0.0000044590965,0.00007838309,0.0027320532,0.000102995196,0.00008261198,0.00008151905,0.00024304829,0.000003076068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00518537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010168875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00518537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002987945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000371534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010310352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362476010","doi":"10.1002/tea.21863","title":"Qualitatively recognizing the dimensions of student environmental identity development within the classroom context","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Vancouver Island University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Environmental education; Vignette; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Agency (philosophy); Context effect; Pedagogy; Sociology; Geography; Social science","score_opus":0.13080899998005183,"score_gpt":0.46497104400215034,"score_spread":0.3341620440220985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362476010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9884437,0.00006590981,0.0037856745,0.0004022904,0.000012391209,0.000061360275,0.000023736673,0.000021499502,0.007183502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99767524,0.00004822394,0.0014718451,0.000026297761,0.0000010974561,0.000029266152,0.0000141479895,0.0000041022495,0.00072984264],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99659246,0.0021982607,0.00011269878,0.00020368556,0.0005618913,0.00033091748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952146,0.0028500499,0.0005403198,0.00029799127,0.00069321995,0.0004038483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036606237,0.00019453972,0.00027084793,0.0011998826,0.0020737692,0.0029687986,0.0005960867,0.0006228621,0.0016776306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009504346,0.00021816092,0.00025095316,0.000540626,0.0028945245,0.0019552528,0.004209937,0.00095876714,0.00017363633],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063217456,0.00014267131,0.0691743,0.00017483189,0.000014092693,0.00082662865,0.8729296,0.00032806813,0.007898325,0.00829841,0.00039295387,0.03975683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005032671,0.00013441945,0.047202148,0.000079504745,0.000010962486,0.00031447914,0.9335024,0.00093097106,0.0038389727,0.0029234553,0.011026515,0.000031237647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024003466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045704897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036606237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020234287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021394945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01935941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380789944","doi":"10.1002/tea.21881","title":"Rebuilding relations and countering erasure through community‐driven and owned science: A key tool to Inuit self‐determination and social transformations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Makivik Corporation","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Indigenous; Sociology; Equity (law); Community of practice; Context (archaeology); Science education; Traditional knowledge; Situated; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Political science; Engineering; Ecology; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.16760562009889618,"score_gpt":0.5324390322921899,"score_spread":0.36483341219329374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380789944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6634516,0.0012934728,0.012550387,0.036758453,0.00032305592,0.00016253935,0.000039200982,0.000100699166,0.28532055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911549,0.00018281728,0.0012468359,0.00049220584,0.000018874027,0.000031681444,0.000005190853,0.000016949205,0.0068505183],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99399686,0.0037787417,0.00008356341,0.00039224743,0.0006165051,0.0011320882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994663,0.0019427796,0.0004442976,0.0006459756,0.0006497686,0.0016541581],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006817814,0.0002640915,0.00029188496,0.000979878,0.019553632,0.0073174634,0.0016008157,0.0014950943,0.004501554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00589955,0.00021948808,0.00023821762,0.0005970675,0.041245032,0.003909097,0.012944498,0.0032314693,0.00027015829],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018423165,0.00010121924,0.004593656,0.00012853969,0.000010587063,0.00069393864,0.78689784,0.00016360631,0.0011797282,0.17502,0.002506946,0.028685432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009771636,0.00011073173,0.0056259404,0.00041209703,0.000014046031,0.00037239792,0.6872994,0.00042405655,0.001130963,0.05965232,0.24491335,0.000034864563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056190122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13954647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98044634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007110732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019742688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.111726165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384300943","doi":"10.1002/tea.21886","title":"Connected by emotion: Teacher agency in an online science education course during <scp>COVID</scp>‐19","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Communication in Education and Healthcare","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China","keywords":"Psychology; Collegiality; Feeling; Agency (philosophy); Teacher education; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Social psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.27656546420935474,"score_gpt":0.5917927684214613,"score_spread":0.3152273042121066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384300943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98958,0.00008708369,0.00062471296,0.0011247664,0.000067807065,0.00003186785,0.000024045548,0.000016019165,0.008443753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99611425,0.000083982144,0.000303406,0.00025614537,0.000018708399,0.000029681394,0.000015455116,0.000014328421,0.0031639992],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980348,0.0012025359,0.000044050743,0.00017233838,0.00022696766,0.00031930377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966524,0.0017272169,0.0004620659,0.00013347775,0.00020715239,0.0008176442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018984798,0.00027773954,0.00040183234,0.0004987969,0.0069183134,0.005758464,0.0006578389,0.0012693517,0.0035114284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004751117,0.00028910048,0.0002889641,0.00027759073,0.004937615,0.0025991586,0.004609373,0.0029013653,0.0004619545],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008195146,0.00032302234,0.017465228,0.00008541048,0.000009839817,0.0017767968,0.9650904,0.000055937227,0.0031401622,0.0013479535,0.0014847008,0.009138593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008314066,0.00011312364,0.016051147,0.000047518966,0.000006055306,0.00049478374,0.96814907,0.000120731704,0.0005738686,0.0003190326,0.014094761,0.000021558997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028402468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008419556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069183134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018673643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010761248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013548791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388423314","doi":"10.1002/tea.21912","title":"“Things your history teacher won't teach you: Science edition”: Black women science teachers as anti‐racist teachers","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Critical Race Theory in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Science education; Curriculum; Pedagogy; Teacher education; Sociology; Narrative; Focus group; Psychology; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.1148118344804511,"score_gpt":0.503542162728267,"score_spread":0.38873032824781595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388423314","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9465406,0.0013777638,0.00089939986,0.023682691,0.0004097367,0.00009228308,0.000025847896,0.000037695612,0.026934018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846468,0.00063620356,0.00036167618,0.0022466187,0.000047205755,0.00005210313,0.00001127951,0.00002822303,0.0119699165],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99549097,0.002533408,0.00008048594,0.00029145196,0.0004941075,0.0011095419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99362165,0.0020347338,0.0011258525,0.00020953019,0.00080081576,0.0022073456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006567182,0.00047673506,0.0005033718,0.0017091581,0.033149023,0.008240972,0.001327083,0.002559742,0.0052382676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007847561,0.00059670437,0.00026912996,0.0009619078,0.019073814,0.004445251,0.007402033,0.0044189384,0.00062740006],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012703207,0.000026684223,0.0035433362,0.000032095573,0.0000016932942,0.00027013256,0.9883166,0.000006536482,0.00042139238,0.0029220488,0.0012981892,0.0031485031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024715914,0.000019219984,0.0012379922,0.00008522689,0.0000029553385,0.000112670554,0.97609574,0.000014961345,0.0001711504,0.00048699605,0.021763977,0.000006517666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034285348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.065946035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034285348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071270107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012888165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06817156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388593814","doi":"10.1002/tea.21914","title":"Crossing boundaries between research and practitioner communities: The role of research use and cross‐community journal authorship","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Educational research; Practitioner research; Medical education; Sociology; Psychology; Public relations; Pedagogy; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.6073560288602701,"score_gpt":0.618531997902137,"score_spread":0.011175969041866907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388593814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94506,0.004719782,0.014959579,0.009231505,0.00017155685,0.00038142435,0.00009596952,0.0000970172,0.025283094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968401,0.0002616094,0.0023581535,0.00013681031,0.000036783986,0.000109186985,0.000015417163,0.0000150360875,0.0002268865],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.6097075,0.30603302,0.028852496,0.01372439,0.034734547,0.0069481186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.13860048,0.7562843,0.06210659,0.020710738,0.014677963,0.007619948],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.22431582,0.00043090552,0.0014995399,0.012690823,0.0073916214,0.024108822,0.0042775525,0.0031683468,0.004319919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.59139365,0.0009735191,0.0007521958,0.012261707,0.013617865,0.022926323,0.022816857,0.002405273,0.00041022996],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053703453,0.00043419682,0.44189572,0.0017694506,0.0004642477,0.0006441456,0.3853941,0.00043214727,0.0011199991,0.0287834,0.00092479354,0.13760076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015293936,0.0004281448,0.35029355,0.004008793,0.0003679031,0.0015590987,0.557022,0.005281125,0.0016381318,0.06023923,0.018795654,0.00021346864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026363388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002402221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7756842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004559614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01110726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9565567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404142428","doi":"10.1002/tea.22001","title":"Evidence of graphical literacy in students' oral presentations: An example from undergraduate chemistry education","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo","keywords":"Mathematics education; Science education; Scientific literacy; Literacy; Chemistry education; Chemistry; Psychology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.37606264017442165,"score_gpt":0.6348201804315392,"score_spread":0.25875754025711756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404142428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99222696,0.00010295381,0.0009928046,0.0005792588,0.000027582324,0.000033468452,0.000035103214,0.000024563222,0.005977394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99652797,0.00013648877,0.00067733263,0.00013091318,0.000022684479,0.00002897772,0.00002446026,0.000019992785,0.0024312004],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99583995,0.002017699,0.00022224501,0.0003319754,0.001163274,0.00042487824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9643681,0.02630388,0.0026323802,0.0016845289,0.0029943238,0.0020167758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005450438,0.0004445774,0.0005162388,0.0018195179,0.0030907423,0.0050495835,0.0010153373,0.001833798,0.0069739493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03569227,0.0003793871,0.00036021296,0.0012259182,0.0035826678,0.002415165,0.0069579515,0.0025723197,0.00090140937],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000192942,0.0009103272,0.031677797,0.0004176609,0.000020137735,0.0037163796,0.90324104,0.00019503846,0.0062538437,0.0030295,0.0022696182,0.048075687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049290644,0.0009253824,0.06280022,0.00056732405,0.00005090936,0.002913884,0.8762917,0.001037125,0.008045717,0.004274179,0.042901687,0.00014254957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016419386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030348948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069739493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012878978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013360147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028825045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410519181","doi":"10.1002/tea.70009","title":"A Multimodal Interactive Framework for Science Assessment in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Educational Games and Gamification","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Institute of Education Sciences; University of Georgia; U.S. Department of Education","keywords":"Generative grammar; Science education; Mathematics education; Computer science; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Psychology","score_opus":0.18736759512643644,"score_gpt":0.595336900515216,"score_spread":0.4079693053887796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410519181","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038332913,0.0006162576,0.91131943,0.0034093794,0.00008216282,0.00031491392,0.000109366134,0.0008687224,0.044946827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.588577,0.00032751335,0.4072931,0.0002708826,0.00003593745,0.00053110416,0.00007309326,0.000101525824,0.002789923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948901,0.003965249,0.00015833504,0.00029178816,0.0005039105,0.00019055317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925097,0.005719052,0.00027953277,0.0005431405,0.0005157989,0.00043276514],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070734336,0.0008905487,0.00041617858,0.0034443717,0.0016907235,0.0062160674,0.001818917,0.0016649488,0.006168755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011393172,0.00039961137,0.00083756435,0.0010130086,0.010728101,0.005090952,0.006137615,0.0020414179,0.000530144],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009472777,0.0001392958,0.0024250739,0.00040048096,0.0000307383,0.0005450144,0.028683012,0.012594412,0.0047528367,0.8751219,0.0015640111,0.073648505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056335164,0.000179865,0.0026623884,0.0010235029,0.000059717582,0.0006671219,0.013189712,0.10664966,0.0034230517,0.79712546,0.07485569,0.00010739594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022319295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029015793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99292654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023955659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015536227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037408352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413436829","doi":"10.1002/tea.70018","title":"Pedagogy of Whole Languaging Hearts: Fostering Relational Ways of (Re)Connecting to the Land With Multilingual Refugee Children","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Refugee; Pedagogy; Sociology; Translanguaging; Mathematics education; Psychology; Linguistics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.23178504387828372,"score_gpt":0.5762890225184342,"score_spread":0.3445039786401505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413436829","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9402152,0.0005003528,0.011787069,0.004061165,0.00017822078,0.0002840002,0.000039816372,0.00016691914,0.04276732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821823,0.0003364389,0.011860814,0.0004431682,0.000016197082,0.0002334976,0.000018346664,0.00005071612,0.0048586014],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99658704,0.0022191524,0.00006318425,0.00035084272,0.00020568547,0.0005740887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99650216,0.0018199785,0.000288958,0.000311093,0.00021389878,0.00086393126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005532874,0.0007168377,0.00045726253,0.00089648174,0.0053593167,0.0042119683,0.0017067419,0.0011931981,0.005045766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006807267,0.00032845023,0.0005467362,0.00035762516,0.009916758,0.0035414011,0.011956494,0.0027570194,0.00057182886],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043593784,0.00038239002,0.0035911617,0.00034383772,0.000009294177,0.0017549417,0.9422638,0.00017412372,0.0048602037,0.018815719,0.0019508019,0.025810214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003923243,0.0003040242,0.004286294,0.0006148874,0.000029667503,0.0010577901,0.8977175,0.00041617366,0.0029666459,0.010040538,0.082475334,0.00005200864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029093744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009994132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005532874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018445135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004054488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029260993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}