{"meta":{"query_hash":"43fd51bcb670","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching"},"cohort_total":69,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":69,"exported":69,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/43fd51bcb670","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Research+in+Science+Teaching"},"results":[{"id":"W1485663774","doi":"10.1002/tea.21060","title":"Emotional arousal of beginning physics teachers during extended experimental investigations","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Teacher Education and Leadership Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Disappointment; Anger; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Mathematics education; Social psychology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.37269758508585643,"score_gpt":0.5497336073211513,"score_spread":0.17703602223529485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1485663774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99006844,0.0003942623,0.000105794075,0.005646933,0.00037192352,0.000087389235,3.20652e-7,0.000009429411,0.0033155095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99453205,0.000011678556,0.00452586,0.000021845137,0.0007970632,0.0000033089,1.18766934e-7,0.00000556792,0.000102505524],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99590474,0.00093114615,0.00036041762,0.00012372664,0.0020390416,0.00064093457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986737,0.00038834734,0.00022991882,0.00010640949,0.00028876553,0.0003128888],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020152818,0.000070077265,0.0001534139,0.0006673125,0.0011029058,0.000095608804,0.0005564425,0.000037838643,0.00002689745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030749198,0.00006443851,0.000059935483,0.0011554359,0.0027687657,0.0018783719,0.00008989834,0.0010795661,0.0000032579183],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066321268,0.00038037548,0.2742631,0.000009276671,0.000007720149,0.00000163224,0.68500453,0.000054958986,0.0240318,0.0142834885,0.00010252488,0.0018539554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028067964,0.00005303064,0.22922799,0.00020809322,0.0000027483545,0.000009563302,0.7644956,0.000029461344,0.0042177197,0.0009685153,0.00041360734,0.00009297462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034757997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001908262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.079491094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074923766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010818335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1487557252","doi":"10.1002/tea.21153","title":"The synergistic effect of affective factors on student learning outcomes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"National Science Council","keywords":"Science education; Psychology; Mathematics education; Phenomenon; Environmental education; Student engagement; Identity (music); Nature of Science; Social psychology; Pedagogy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02417867988641118,"score_gpt":0.4265226025004368,"score_spread":0.4023439226140256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1487557252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99454474,0.000008162553,0.00006460434,0.00044297063,0.00014280101,0.000153738,7.101918e-8,0.0000026538746,0.004640274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99978936,0.00000766983,0.000046143803,0.000011205946,0.000015709298,0.0000030076974,3.5612032e-8,0.0000040676027,0.00012282368],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951767,0.001980526,0.0002955468,0.00017898284,0.001990309,0.00037796382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99425274,0.0051934836,0.00017786826,0.00020778632,0.000024256928,0.00014387182],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03690409,0.00008250771,0.00017186867,0.00021235121,0.0007530598,0.000081792474,0.0007898232,0.000022098202,0.00003403562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013086333,0.00004299054,0.000060072383,0.0004992221,0.0016320935,0.00029718588,0.0002652002,0.0011466244,0.000008990551],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020721607,0.00010647495,0.972463,0.0000050223366,0.0000023977445,0.0000017216588,0.00256362,0.005335716,0.0035891924,0.0003307055,0.000014798081,0.01556661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020819974,0.0010354104,0.9893338,0.000032116695,0.0000018401339,0.000001506168,0.005641166,0.00040449575,0.0024562443,0.00045866283,0.0003805885,0.000045979934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020680296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020809615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023817757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011544665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005091821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99522686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526461237","doi":"10.1002/tea.21141","title":"Reframing research on informal teaching and learning in science: Comments and commentary at the heart of a new vision for the field","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Innovative Education and Learning Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Cognitive reframing; Sociology; Science education; Epistemology; Grounded theory; Learning sciences; Learning theory; Field (mathematics); Pedagogy; Diversity (politics); Educational research; Experiential learning; Psychology; Social science; Qualitative research; Social psychology","score_opus":0.20893360045123385,"score_gpt":0.6004201044970175,"score_spread":0.39148650404578367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526461237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8528748,0.00007622427,0.000081946346,0.14266853,0.00015107164,0.00022574741,8.5293145e-8,0.000002244468,0.0039193174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970202,0.000049713104,0.0012708734,0.0011581519,0.00018280675,0.0000032743167,7.148365e-8,0.000003398622,0.00031151748],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925634,0.0037945928,0.00038056355,0.00019016553,0.0024635356,0.0006077329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9739011,0.0251243,0.00023959528,0.00015184359,0.00044177062,0.00014138936],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2680061,0.00005885926,0.00012873767,0.0012263372,0.0082207415,0.00059291907,0.0008325612,0.00003717809,0.000008332235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057556856,0.000035179957,0.00001941479,0.001525903,0.0029725695,0.0015422121,0.00040980772,0.0041989638,5.998302e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033308793,0.00014875429,0.13701086,0.00003598002,0.0000058002047,0.0000013675776,0.3674417,0.00030748182,0.006826508,0.022576883,0.00786612,0.45744544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089198205,0.0017250081,0.14295912,0.00082480867,0.0000026437338,0.000010708297,0.37867004,0.0050202827,0.00042340855,0.0013437017,0.46801645,0.00011184306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054987096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005324383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46015033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003162521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008258439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592094823","doi":"10.1002/tea.21235","title":"Experimental evidence of the superiority of the prevalence model of conceptual change over the classical models and repetition","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptual change; Repetition (rhetorical device); Cognition; Psychology; Teaching method; Mathematics education; Concept learning; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.6733055901548778,"score_gpt":0.581618746847263,"score_spread":0.09168684330761478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1592094823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910576,0.00067031005,0.00006456769,0.006862245,0.00033668033,0.00020993665,0.0000015105968,0.0000011954886,0.0007959521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994607,0.00011603172,0.00018742982,0.00004166195,0.00010563097,0.0000037062737,5.6504854e-9,0.0000017430804,0.00008306922],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943912,0.0017339864,0.00036858217,0.0001490699,0.0030841846,0.00027298127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977053,0.0009763796,0.0003180788,0.00026735084,0.00059831626,0.00013462002],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03371812,0.00005050393,0.00013346941,0.00015688913,0.00064795435,0.000060567865,0.0016371204,0.000039073217,0.0000113570995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072756046,0.000025062933,0.000058350615,0.0009377413,0.010789011,0.0015891839,0.00032212373,0.00068086374,1.1662558e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007393472,0.0002240845,0.1172487,0.000040386407,0.0000027425444,5.1053803e-7,0.7334712,0.0013337025,0.06056047,0.08561266,0.00015541166,0.0012761826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071902864,0.0006484372,0.13473666,0.0023500242,0.000014578681,0.000024343817,0.7275308,0.088147596,0.022871833,0.02246112,0.00030528544,0.00019029669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012777343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021128131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08681389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022791498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026662755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1905924488","doi":"10.1002/tea.21088","title":"Science identity trajectories of latecomers to science in college","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Career Development and Diversity","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Persistence (discontinuity); Science education; Construct (python library); Mathematics education; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; Aesthetics; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11700772689378522,"score_gpt":0.4724725776818442,"score_spread":0.355464850788059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1905924488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97981316,0.000018730445,0.000028912278,0.001734145,0.0005617513,0.00025842857,8.760953e-7,0.0000053104163,0.017578714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974348,0.000019189898,0.0023273085,0.000023721006,0.00004762575,0.0000015941132,1.3471494e-8,0.00000211375,0.00014365358],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912267,0.00028631787,0.00044588454,0.00031302252,0.006682489,0.0010456395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967494,0.000388207,0.00016308893,0.00018293473,0.0019719342,0.0005444571],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.088409066,0.00007198399,0.00021127814,0.007089837,0.0021057588,0.0006320733,0.0036288695,0.000032455973,0.000059140748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011591603,0.00006428673,0.00003929911,0.01966706,0.010018507,0.009338528,0.0007544778,0.0007434456,0.000011409868],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031161457,0.0001656486,0.776067,0.000017078035,0.0000015731875,0.000042327843,0.09533021,0.0001029181,0.068610564,0.05260174,0.00030641552,0.006723373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003601971,0.00017905362,0.8627419,0.00025101964,0.0000011228627,0.000005605185,0.1256767,0.0001044721,0.0031021964,0.0068628807,0.0005594567,0.00015536889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0099079255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030613225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08667492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020758004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011279013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1951617065","doi":"10.1002/tea.21105","title":"“We could think of things that could be science”: Girls' re‐figuring of science in an out‐of‐school‐time club","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Club; Science education; Sociology; Sociocultural evolution; Figuring; Conversation; Media studies; Pedagogy; Psychology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.3456807385697034,"score_gpt":0.5584848036195793,"score_spread":0.21280406504987592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1951617065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9706491,0.00011027072,0.000048236187,0.008106101,0.0009850356,0.0003934551,0.0000011538002,0.000011398798,0.019695254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952713,0.00014394139,0.0040384834,0.00011818538,0.00014046788,0.000004283475,9.90775e-8,0.000008603997,0.00027460806],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845489,0.0012469939,0.0012964127,0.000659482,0.01063204,0.0016161551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926043,0.0015526775,0.0010911569,0.0006633,0.0030582761,0.0010302461],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.15110247,0.00017093326,0.00052563794,0.0062982244,0.0022643611,0.00075391284,0.0069045774,0.00012249518,0.00031873962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02361965,0.00014053765,0.00010053543,0.009880045,0.028313283,0.013953586,0.0005468252,0.002290926,0.000012437949],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003759761,0.0005034316,0.13949452,0.0000497011,0.0000026015232,0.0000084466,0.48136044,0.00027743503,0.3575712,0.008078926,0.0002893738,0.012326295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096452306,0.0010059408,0.15087047,0.001679857,0.000007820914,0.000019652485,0.7776341,0.0067485813,0.044082087,0.015564099,0.0009268361,0.00049607205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006464745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007590589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31348914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011765017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017395172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966380625","doi":"10.1002/tea.20406","title":"Science student role: Evidence of social structural norms specific to school science","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Advanced Education; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Science education; Psychology; Agency (philosophy); Sociocultural evolution; Dialectic; Mathematics education; Exploratory research; Consistency (knowledge bases); Qualitative research; Structure and agency; Identity (music); Pedagogy; Social psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Social science","score_opus":0.23982786540992768,"score_gpt":0.6175206301682914,"score_spread":0.3776927647583637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966380625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97799355,0.000072519906,0.000038498805,0.007244735,0.0026349688,0.0003142858,6.549686e-7,0.000011404608,0.011689393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947054,0.000028056076,0.0039935526,0.00008362792,0.0010077312,0.0000035717721,2.0473315e-8,0.0000059188706,0.00017212042],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98303574,0.00062675425,0.0008529084,0.0006941934,0.013000882,0.0017894909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99252284,0.0009802101,0.0004485572,0.0004885043,0.004093901,0.0014659917],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.15919402,0.0001405066,0.0003001807,0.0067677204,0.007246823,0.0018115547,0.008642083,0.00006815807,0.00026286696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033668287,0.00011271375,0.00007973681,0.018581973,0.024431448,0.0072566667,0.0007992575,0.0028827486,0.0000408568],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000382411,0.00010781206,0.074980795,0.0000069345147,0.0000010831928,0.000008128774,0.12928817,0.000048458318,0.710364,0.061252397,0.00014196604,0.023762003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034996745,0.0005532554,0.71246886,0.0003292396,0.0000029823273,0.000049653,0.25894624,0.00019219864,0.013552776,0.0052646897,0.007946312,0.00034379523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010764217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007074905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69681126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015318929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029300336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99941766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969379996","doi":"10.1002/tea.20001","title":"Why educate “little scientists?” Examining the potential of practice‐based scientific literacy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":131,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific literacy; Agency (philosophy); Curriculum; Science education; Literacy; Mathematics education; Work (physics); Process (computing); Pedagogy; Sociology; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Social science; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.2300005072014985,"score_gpt":0.5697090228606678,"score_spread":0.3397085156591693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969379996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9418502,0.00024703683,0.001415877,0.044581212,0.0035153648,0.00021460504,9.649948e-7,0.000008230606,0.008166544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918046,0.000020136813,0.0071200524,0.0003695221,0.0004213403,0.0000032583123,2.0784668e-7,0.0000053587205,0.00025551638],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99041015,0.0021587284,0.00064345676,0.0003788066,0.0054712216,0.00093763013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99424857,0.0020201062,0.0005491905,0.00041649782,0.0023780267,0.00038761643],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13578698,0.000090658206,0.0001769993,0.0023218116,0.004866995,0.0020757117,0.0027182407,0.00004868605,0.00009095583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027685922,0.00006404981,0.00007909237,0.0061303372,0.0089848405,0.004060673,0.00017581534,0.0014696047,0.000012499145],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016147671,0.002315776,0.020101944,0.000059710615,0.000016370961,0.00014986271,0.6421192,0.009687291,0.09516974,0.13163081,0.0040868227,0.09450095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018054597,0.0007388898,0.0458486,0.0013491521,0.000023790113,0.00021858685,0.63182896,0.0014149367,0.004436181,0.028931476,0.28294036,0.00046362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003306124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002979242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27885354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073739176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014115684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99896026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973562194","doi":"10.1002/tea.20275","title":"Natural pedagogical conversations in high school students' internship","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Internship; Conversation; Natural (archaeology); Psychology; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Science education; Medical education; Medicine","score_opus":0.33044744162149836,"score_gpt":0.6241920804576232,"score_spread":0.29374463883612484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973562194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882428,0.00011059915,0.0012963249,0.0035195611,0.00075509434,0.000116413845,2.241898e-7,0.000013477344,0.0059454762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928071,0.0000030979463,0.0058357427,0.00020171933,0.0002678217,0.0000019280826,2.2498364e-7,0.0000059490562,0.00087645516],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911436,0.0051389625,0.00066170277,0.00031339718,0.0019822554,0.0007600966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997755,0.0012329249,0.00021750272,0.0002474483,0.00036316316,0.00018395373],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08929852,0.000107078864,0.0002599725,0.0029815463,0.00035901926,0.00026281015,0.0015497415,0.00007408292,0.00014657874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010634204,0.000083393556,0.00005508734,0.0020015955,0.0005212458,0.0006524165,0.00012935164,0.0075933356,0.00003557967],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002812673,0.0006814635,0.85543525,0.0000057126467,0.000011450768,0.0005241161,0.043553077,0.00012674434,0.008662821,0.038407534,0.0005309509,0.05177959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010457905,0.0005474035,0.97779906,0.00022830853,0.0000014216216,0.00010435314,0.014897244,0.00011335278,0.000040885097,0.0045286715,0.0005960686,0.00009744434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032857282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000126804525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12236378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070124207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035925262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976183541","doi":"10.1002/tea.10114","title":"Emergence, flexibility, and stabilization of language in a physics classroom","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Flexibility (engineering); German; Phenomenon; Mathematics education; Science education; Teaching method; Sociology; Epistemology; Linguistics; Psychology; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.25368838062180427,"score_gpt":0.5679914771303536,"score_spread":0.3143030965085493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976183541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9828617,0.0001532818,0.00031502827,0.00072969747,0.00023068908,0.000101067904,2.1488357e-7,0.0000021985384,0.015606122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99811864,0.00009975098,0.0016207258,0.000014512137,0.00006943963,0.0000010190071,3.4273416e-8,0.0000018629071,0.00007400503],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960831,0.0015251462,0.00035390863,0.00016087381,0.0014655389,0.0004114327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861574,0.0006072752,0.00014368813,0.000116443895,0.00035087662,0.00016599003],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05909484,0.00004040591,0.00012125737,0.0007748283,0.00039974818,0.00009164362,0.00045276922,0.00003182555,0.00006983243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012404554,0.000034755347,0.000020998637,0.0027234782,0.0015203642,0.0010417993,0.00004324599,0.00060825783,8.9607823e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010866919,0.00022518428,0.6231441,0.00001832637,8.202751e-7,0.0000051627126,0.25145286,0.00023574458,0.009251681,0.07770364,0.00006031657,0.037891306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005204205,0.0002206465,0.06983254,0.0002470386,0.0000017137443,0.00000909238,0.87518233,0.0019640739,0.0021857193,0.047559,0.0021259082,0.00015151057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014386465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016325063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62372947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019127753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002377667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977215039","doi":"10.1002/tea.20419","title":"Globalizing students acting for the common good","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":194,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; York University","keywords":"Consumerism; Science education; Sociology; Goods and services; Egalitarianism; Intangible good; Dualism; Consumption (sociology); Public relations; Environmental ethics; Economics; Political science; Social science; Epistemology; Law; Pedagogy; Politics","score_opus":0.459982540797794,"score_gpt":0.5957294216075077,"score_spread":0.13574688080971375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977215039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96071273,0.0003752757,0.00025479007,0.0014627555,0.0009323919,0.00015379876,5.163735e-7,0.0000045839897,0.036103174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978327,0.000016817396,0.0017555133,0.000045104945,0.00020260838,0.000008830245,4.4792703e-8,0.0000039477836,0.0001344412],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778944,0.00033991883,0.0003196674,0.00013606189,0.0009342627,0.0004806351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976108,0.0017083464,0.00018379954,0.00019125074,0.00022907204,0.00007670759],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030367032,0.000052419236,0.00011105248,0.00028353947,0.0008297199,0.00020246055,0.0016827236,0.000029082305,0.000029183577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012200194,0.000031615957,0.000050022867,0.00045865297,0.0004894077,0.000410314,0.00016514355,0.0008532229,0.000004188371],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016885229,0.00037963243,0.80598986,0.000018626532,0.00003588198,0.00004123391,0.036454722,0.000036678306,0.00051098154,0.11466749,0.0019079725,0.03978805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038808573,0.0004239835,0.8055751,0.00015081652,0.000005032347,0.00012862108,0.17394255,0.00005699976,0.000077855446,0.015528171,0.0036508574,0.000071969764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011199064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005477626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13748783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020228981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022831887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99844116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987036165","doi":"10.1002/tea.20094","title":"Everyday objects of learning about health and healing and implications for science education","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Science education; Sociocultural evolution; Context (archaeology); Curriculum; Pedagogy; Learning sciences; Psychology; Obligation; Sociology; Mathematics education; Educational technology; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.2259657284230799,"score_gpt":0.6079655810149432,"score_spread":0.3819998525918633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987036165","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96175355,0.0013157504,0.00048364318,0.033128545,0.00024134363,0.00024144427,4.3542568e-7,0.0000051016336,0.002830199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988765,0.00062817754,0.010078403,0.00014467454,0.0002488905,0.000004531636,9.358496e-8,0.0000027068852,0.00012753456],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997235,0.00048384405,0.0003888825,0.00023612093,0.0011005161,0.0005556505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971062,0.0010344083,0.00030429402,0.0001081171,0.0009422241,0.00050474453],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06557021,0.00004854488,0.0001381918,0.0015968285,0.0034647915,0.00033071745,0.0005970721,0.000025219264,0.0000034682475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013133773,0.000043492055,0.000019626052,0.0019827965,0.0032712324,0.0018062111,0.00007652867,0.00057997426,3.2892459e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013633584,0.00013338386,0.11635213,0.000037847054,0.0000010731784,7.7344005e-8,0.2009567,0.00014781061,0.008522323,0.102736436,0.00017159323,0.57092696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065570575,0.00079420634,0.27924863,0.00096247456,0.0000036070128,0.0000647203,0.64788526,0.0023566862,0.00071420654,0.018680302,0.04837445,0.0002597563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010484952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004803961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5706672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005368687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020203667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988371629","doi":"10.1002/tea.20266","title":"Metacognitive engagement during field‐trip experiences: A case study of students in an amusement park physics program","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Metacognition; Psychology; Mathematics education; Amusement; Argumentative; Cognitive dissonance; Curiosity; Think aloud protocol; Science education; Cognition; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.4184811433073895,"score_gpt":0.6302846631503787,"score_spread":0.21180351984298917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988371629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99783105,0.000042206877,0.00053811574,0.000031901985,0.00026869183,0.00067757955,2.135489e-7,0.000012951581,0.00059727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939974,0.0000040958635,0.005722743,0.000016193362,0.00012377398,0.00009409106,8.905529e-8,0.000010906044,0.000030725645],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851094,0.010165705,0.0009525202,0.00044841826,0.0025652258,0.0007587663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975257,0.0010204682,0.0004265384,0.00033850395,0.00053691637,0.00015190925],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06301729,0.00014587735,0.0003882274,0.0017160292,0.00084079424,0.0001074593,0.0010649201,0.00004654002,0.000028969096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024422724,0.0001179755,0.00005361258,0.0023094611,0.00053271546,0.0007233199,0.00029120862,0.0034457298,0.0000011985532],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014892206,0.004947854,0.41972733,0.0000114907325,0.000026008,0.0056685046,0.53055924,0.00013153178,0.0011177011,0.0000349725,0.0000054654383,0.037620977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022840227,0.0058016013,0.23068231,0.00020441925,0.0000063465272,0.0006489907,0.7593369,0.00016958342,0.0006575082,0.000051135237,0.000023743321,0.00013343498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014424355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006529307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22877765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030434053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024288605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988888717","doi":"10.1002/tea.20245","title":"The writing on the wall: Classroom context, curriculum implementation, and student learning in integrated, community‐based science projects","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Diverse Educational Innovations Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Framing (construction); Discipline; Mathematics education; Context (archaeology); Pedagogy; Integrated curriculum; Science education; Sociology; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.1745288448804819,"score_gpt":0.4777921908135513,"score_spread":0.30326334593306936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988888717","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9850932,0.00005407701,0.0000043645096,0.0137246875,0.00009017779,0.00021423574,4.342611e-7,0.0000047244853,0.00081414427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995921,0.000020411959,0.00012452528,0.00019357001,0.00004815006,0.000006410976,3.892218e-7,5.4165497e-7,0.000013894054],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99647087,0.00079955783,0.00042580022,0.00014936838,0.0016391377,0.00051524676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99391913,0.004746385,0.00020608437,0.000062784675,0.0009954663,0.00007014257],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08595631,0.00007139333,0.000091942835,0.00035668822,0.0051768012,0.00065942644,0.0011366797,0.000015823569,0.0000050513027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042060884,0.0000226355,0.00001939469,0.0036447064,0.0017623251,0.00056498195,0.0002679733,0.0019594387,0.0000011680191],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012695296,0.00018052978,0.86591214,0.0000026137666,0.000002400599,0.000005425125,0.005133009,0.000031913547,0.016150272,0.016475629,0.00010352238,0.095989846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000114295304,0.00026044698,0.51346296,0.00013321036,5.8695355e-7,0.000005926658,0.48347408,0.00016193416,0.0003736586,0.00038834993,0.0015808974,0.00004367518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023608876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046689245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47834104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005371986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034898933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989412404","doi":"10.1002/tea.20259","title":"Representations of scientists in Canadian high school and college textbooks","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Perceptions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Mathematics education; Semiotics; Sample (material); Sociology; Domain (mathematical analysis); Psychology; Pedagogy; Epistemology; Linguistics; Chemistry; Mathematics","score_opus":0.20330528181118424,"score_gpt":0.5371441528203745,"score_spread":0.3338388710091903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989412404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9722747,0.00005788053,0.000012270072,0.0029114028,0.00047897996,0.000115671726,0.0000050766503,0.0000016317341,0.024142355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971315,0.000017199423,0.0014186824,0.000048366994,0.00006289905,0.00000404299,1.8096353e-7,0.0000027713565,0.0013143122],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974838,0.00042625336,0.00039586797,0.00021355234,0.00095122424,0.00052931154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984327,0.00034736804,0.000103077786,0.00021685478,0.00033700973,0.00056299847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0154763935,0.000046520752,0.00012248693,0.004371601,0.0007190212,0.000059358543,0.0006045121,0.000035331468,0.000502426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027031095,0.000041407875,0.000021338225,0.0025403674,0.0019390493,0.00062511285,0.000052236544,0.00082384626,0.000019627361],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012445204,0.00013056606,0.9453988,0.0000038051062,0.0000017901865,0.00012259684,0.02694187,0.000059898914,0.0051950132,0.016796794,0.0035497837,0.0017866563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029693314,0.000069222915,0.9818822,0.00006297381,5.3070835e-7,0.00032622294,0.015042368,0.00010115208,0.000035095996,0.0010501602,0.0010911066,0.000042011143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22006422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09150297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12856124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044630546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037478064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92507476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990175035","doi":"10.1002/tea.21067","title":"New metaphors about culture: Implications for research in science teacher preparation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Science education; Sociology; Social science education; Ethnic group; Equity (law); Pedagogy; Social science; Epistemology; Psychology; Political science; Anthropology","score_opus":0.5191058058577324,"score_gpt":0.6724275424104231,"score_spread":0.15332173655269077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990175035","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92522067,0.0009117158,0.0018854169,0.024507336,0.001309609,0.00091658847,0.0000011786283,0.000015972932,0.04523151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877813,0.00013529854,0.009627172,0.00004820123,0.001013571,0.00003185105,2.3351804e-7,0.0000061139563,0.0013562667],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907475,0.0019707335,0.0006242725,0.00042054345,0.004247655,0.0019892629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99509597,0.001507709,0.00021826962,0.00036074154,0.0018027346,0.0010145922],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24196675,0.00009108932,0.00018870743,0.004180599,0.0042389105,0.0009277549,0.002683895,0.00008731636,0.00005546934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02342082,0.00007494696,0.00006471513,0.010147355,0.00415611,0.0058945687,0.00018861161,0.0019190665,0.000016806174],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064643646,0.0005180504,0.21684355,0.000013815769,0.0000032699036,0.0000012502161,0.39385876,0.0001239447,0.028021026,0.25991133,0.0083226785,0.092317685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009935817,0.00054854323,0.3791232,0.00038446332,0.0000067934716,0.000040657756,0.31911314,0.0007343018,0.0018137782,0.073810555,0.22299582,0.00043516004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032627592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013639564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21854593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002145533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01308221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000334156","doi":"10.1002/tea.20030","title":"Coteaching: Creating resources for learning and learning to teach chemistry in urban high schools","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":128,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Mathematics education; Honor; Pedagogy; Sociology; Agency (philosophy); Science education; Social studies; Teaching method; Psychology; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04467232902993583,"score_gpt":0.44283889613795974,"score_spread":0.3981665671080239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000334156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98688656,0.00021221429,0.0006753307,0.005737517,0.00008501283,0.0003034876,4.7125235e-7,0.000027374026,0.006072032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869693,0.00004599634,0.011933674,0.000031436928,0.00044391467,0.000009401358,2.5855869e-7,0.000014581544,0.0005514309],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99384487,0.0020650814,0.0006021315,0.00043506417,0.0020595542,0.0009932801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969255,0.001715866,0.00027813102,0.0001157968,0.00050861476,0.0004560941],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.087226674,0.00013991135,0.00032531217,0.0013280843,0.005168299,0.0008228243,0.00083027227,0.00010377086,0.0000073026767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053826094,0.00012809322,0.0000501784,0.0021202916,0.0006487193,0.0012132948,0.000373371,0.005311211,0.0000014476371],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026654048,0.0002598979,0.24052294,0.00007958368,0.000008825464,0.00007257863,0.54940665,0.016487148,0.13696866,0.0059978226,0.00010907199,0.049820304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038598166,0.0017984541,0.033380285,0.0051593673,0.000010178897,0.00004547247,0.8696613,0.002035804,0.002335293,0.010040363,0.0709346,0.0007390724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005498358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00050365535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32025465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022801624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014467809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010808139","doi":"10.1002/tea.20343","title":"Teaching about ethics through socioscientific issues in physics and chemistry: Teacher candidates' beliefs","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Archetype; Subject (documents); Mathematics education; Science education; Chemistry; Teacher education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Sociology; Computer science; Literature; Library science","score_opus":0.3037794294812641,"score_gpt":0.5836462905747329,"score_spread":0.27986686109346887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010808139","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9055688,0.0007810098,0.00093237,0.029325895,0.00056665565,0.00027786588,0.0000014660594,0.000042500276,0.062503435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97464144,0.00034950284,0.022861574,0.00022462152,0.0010448679,0.0000029842688,2.954419e-7,0.000009945593,0.0008647412],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98456603,0.007371927,0.0008936492,0.0006626008,0.0048524956,0.0016532958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99518096,0.0031211681,0.00049189705,0.00031120153,0.0006447118,0.00025004812],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.22631711,0.00020791794,0.0004820097,0.00065046205,0.004699246,0.0009680186,0.002496117,0.00027273406,0.000020660082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048703052,0.00017928985,0.00007935129,0.0034370653,0.008197158,0.0032497256,0.0003651048,0.008857165,0.0000026496414],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040102917,0.00037265022,0.04032735,0.00004111563,0.000006530646,0.000075022035,0.6910339,0.00008706465,0.026270378,0.11572927,0.00060048077,0.1254161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011840846,0.0004871522,0.048858527,0.0017305743,0.0000103105795,0.0000351309,0.3184119,0.00067870575,0.0023737636,0.5758164,0.049515057,0.00089840195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008521254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006373633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46008712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016429326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024882148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018277211","doi":"10.1002/tea.10030","title":"Structural characteristics of university engineering students' conceptions of energy*","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"","keywords":"Paragraph; Mathematics education; Energy (signal processing); Curriculum; Psychology; Science education; Pedagogy; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.1868312501713779,"score_gpt":0.4896802766956428,"score_spread":0.30284902652426493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018277211","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963665,0.000033846274,0.0001605784,0.00072334916,0.00034804287,0.00003246454,0.0000013376388,0.000002605626,0.0023313016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988909,0.000101155056,0.0006465875,0.00000625673,0.00010892264,8.782816e-8,4.9976894e-8,0.0000014448099,0.00024461243],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970164,0.00052360824,0.00027517337,0.00009348774,0.0017983514,0.00029300066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983764,0.0006207963,0.00021257362,0.00009792696,0.00052476395,0.00016749153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014376076,0.000036815334,0.00013104975,0.0009346831,0.00048681715,0.0000605281,0.0011240436,0.000028443164,0.00014146756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003281411,0.000033942924,0.00003836182,0.0014600852,0.0013894392,0.00074422796,0.00008359904,0.00046401672,8.395597e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002973093,0.00028515965,0.64980376,0.000026256215,0.000010930584,0.000027667222,0.18145359,0.00050753343,0.020003315,0.1157859,0.00027597175,0.031790216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071303424,0.0003523261,0.7584757,0.00043856094,0.000008302866,0.000022455743,0.21805944,0.0051614116,0.0007889861,0.0008085998,0.014949342,0.00022179182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00085895724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008330394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11497729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002671804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053436944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51194465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030525854","doi":"10.1002/tea.20332","title":"Scientific literacy and contexts in PISA 2006 science","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Educational Assessment and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific literacy; Science education; Popular science; Literacy; Library science; Citation; Mathematics education; Sociology; Computer science; Pedagogy; Psychology","score_opus":0.14566067948544895,"score_gpt":0.5959413946273923,"score_spread":0.45028071514194334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030525854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96860564,0.00038357082,0.000019236828,0.012587726,0.00042030064,0.00011689237,3.7166015e-7,0.000003899674,0.017862337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975796,0.00005605694,0.0015137285,0.000077929755,0.00020887027,9.545472e-7,7.385133e-8,0.0000017880772,0.0005610486],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99475724,0.0005514682,0.00038261313,0.00029902117,0.003210946,0.000798723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979023,0.0006791459,0.00013850667,0.0001398366,0.00080525654,0.00033495922],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08456427,0.00006174137,0.00013830778,0.003265236,0.002212568,0.0019311811,0.0012364148,0.000030643587,0.000022378044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040466874,0.00005227042,0.000022897142,0.004336147,0.0053021437,0.004599872,0.00009574103,0.000990683,0.0000037840794],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034890316,0.0004366227,0.42623374,0.000009721231,0.0000010156016,0.000063971514,0.12613867,0.000037210666,0.021783866,0.21324982,0.0004430316,0.21156745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006310859,0.00032403547,0.83514345,0.0005858809,0.0000014467604,0.000037655573,0.032468732,0.0005088714,0.00027845908,0.10643944,0.023371939,0.00020901351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087125757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006196318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4089097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068267476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060936566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036352550","doi":"10.1002/tea.20060","title":"Developmental growth in students' concept of energy: Analysis of selected items from the TIMSS database","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Mathematics education; Test (biology); Rasch model; Psychology; Item response theory; Cognitive development; Energy (signal processing); Curriculum; Science education; Concept learning; Piaget's theory of cognitive development; Achievement test; Cognition; Item analysis; Classical test theory; Developmental psychology; Pedagogy; Psychometrics; Standardized test; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.1563988933828027,"score_gpt":0.5295182645943851,"score_spread":0.37311937121158245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036352550","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99539685,0.00014951103,0.00019811139,0.0026411188,0.00011004513,0.000066798864,0.000005655436,0.0000021474889,0.0014297817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980246,0.000086195425,0.0016232204,0.000066441076,0.00012997331,0.0000014752865,0.0000012022088,0.0000021125309,0.00006480356],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935495,0.0016847809,0.0006199623,0.00019586201,0.0035131888,0.00043667498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965272,0.0021406556,0.00032127064,0.000120752164,0.0007216962,0.0001684483],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03763586,0.000059290523,0.00023780175,0.0018369664,0.0005315574,0.0001412583,0.0022342575,0.000034515237,0.00015888394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073632877,0.00004200115,0.000053157637,0.009483815,0.0018582534,0.0013145049,0.00017184179,0.0006851785,0.0000011125838],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022228365,0.0002866561,0.8336598,0.0000013760997,0.000030044554,0.0000041035055,0.14570157,0.00028782806,0.0075306552,0.0037554551,0.00028734258,0.008432939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051844673,0.0000758703,0.76523185,0.00017184706,0.000022572736,0.000002383323,0.22554137,0.0016367108,0.0039046858,0.00048622553,0.0022843438,0.00012369374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026341151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017146327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.079839796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053643103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003421704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9909564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042032395","doi":"10.1002/tea.10122","title":"Prevalence, function, and structure of photographs in high school biology textbooks","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Digital Storytelling and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":227,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Subject matter; Relation (database); Mathematics education; Function (biology); Interpretation (philosophy); Focus (optics); Subject (documents); Science education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Computer science; Curriculum; Linguistics; Library science; Biology; Physics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10008188208443987,"score_gpt":0.4917033907251358,"score_spread":0.39162150864069595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042032395","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933029,0.00037721684,0.000109851615,0.00009875232,0.00044623873,0.00015271099,0.0000012735292,0.000002569661,0.0055085025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988723,0.00008174124,0.0008229478,0.000028668894,0.00006151465,0.0000020642526,1.6504674e-7,0.0000035049457,0.0001271162],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974804,0.000986741,0.00048223007,0.00015130492,0.0004857876,0.00041352506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851614,0.0006476198,0.00021601681,0.00012055588,0.00033784323,0.00016184444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014033817,0.00005218673,0.00014786022,0.0015043289,0.000421943,0.000022943472,0.00024966113,0.000072221956,0.00005977353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041385205,0.000038902966,0.000017038295,0.0008416694,0.00049543555,0.00045207786,0.00004199997,0.0017954638,0.0000020024643],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003333748,0.000045261557,0.97034454,0.0000933238,0.0000017889795,0.0000010583735,0.0030810738,0.000024748078,0.01843854,0.004497241,0.000058510686,0.0033805927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009258881,0.00055162667,0.8470506,0.0014966913,0.000003545577,0.000016141039,0.01989077,0.000046790265,0.00046860139,0.12779891,0.0016440616,0.00010633482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031601146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046968693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12330168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020145114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012279402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7800497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050341665","doi":"10.1002/tea.20015","title":"Learning to write like a scientist: Coauthoring as an enculturation task","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Enculturation; Task (project management); Supervisor; Process (computing); Civility; Psychology; Writing process; Prewriting; Pedagogy; Engineering ethics; Mathematics education; Sociology; Computer science; Cooperative learning; Teaching method; Political science; Management","score_opus":0.1534310262692533,"score_gpt":0.5336386349651023,"score_spread":0.380207608695849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050341665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98098373,0.00008449185,0.0003963676,0.0028169958,0.0008827546,0.00011077228,2.6110106e-7,0.000012405078,0.014712204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99502784,0.000008923308,0.004043839,0.00006117898,0.00029317912,0.000005925668,4.113985e-7,0.0000053956564,0.0005532941],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99692523,0.00046411535,0.00037384365,0.00029210403,0.001347519,0.0005971604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986949,0.0002263142,0.00014072983,0.00017204399,0.00047135164,0.00029464223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020307988,0.0000758423,0.00013083269,0.0011163031,0.001058313,0.0006016964,0.0008348268,0.00004544881,0.000036986723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00197566,0.00006045827,0.000036369744,0.0014501918,0.0004548142,0.001369051,0.00011643917,0.0014068478,0.00006429349],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003730189,0.0012286339,0.068927355,0.0000538859,0.000027857137,0.00085495313,0.35213333,0.050776526,0.16370076,0.2734887,0.0008696721,0.087565295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013149988,0.0058964114,0.39765745,0.0010194199,0.000006950097,0.0020172468,0.52363634,0.00020118723,0.0010095942,0.051302712,0.015455618,0.00048207518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011773101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000079285695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3287301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005441394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007471633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8139794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053173693","doi":"10.1002/tea.20363","title":"Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Career Development and Diversity","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1058,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Competence (human resources); Identity (music); Science education; Physics education; Mathematics education; Psychology; Social psychology; Physics","score_opus":0.2459867115279199,"score_gpt":0.4954332371992698,"score_spread":0.2494465256713499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053173693","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99656355,0.000037079222,0.00083631685,0.00025598588,0.0008079764,0.00026786572,9.1075935e-7,0.00001809705,0.0012122275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99607486,0.000008441968,0.0029069618,0.000022323984,0.00093460566,0.0000059282047,2.1316986e-7,0.0000070974575,0.000039585728],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99441546,0.0005187723,0.00039450085,0.00032837872,0.0036908078,0.00065207714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975952,0.00067144947,0.00025110733,0.0001994226,0.0008905109,0.000392324],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016177747,0.00011920623,0.00024634175,0.00029894637,0.0031279945,0.001228919,0.0012137678,0.000054276097,0.00002895853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049706474,0.00010987034,0.000061197214,0.0017346237,0.0009810756,0.004792815,0.0005502731,0.0019033904,0.0000068188924],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067707183,0.00017431214,0.7343407,0.000006980425,0.00000834522,0.000025656589,0.2525537,0.000016577651,0.0007047237,0.0040047904,0.000046219935,0.0081111835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074511283,0.00008899878,0.17800227,0.000038913742,0.000009755366,0.000005556227,0.81177336,0.00015202457,0.00017284305,0.008679641,0.00012772052,0.00020380336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032792727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019136419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55921966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040809019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011332002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058518083","doi":"10.1002/tea.20333","title":"PISA 2006: An assessment of scientific literacy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":313,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific literacy; Mathematics education; Test (biology); Literacy; Psychology; Reading (process); Science education; Scale (ratio); Achievement test; Pedagogy; Medical education; Standardized test; Medicine; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.2878043853163388,"score_gpt":0.6688702908396115,"score_spread":0.3810659055232727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058518083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9618589,0.00005781722,0.00025252427,0.0068194577,0.00090930774,0.000110656365,6.1874533e-7,0.000006229013,0.029984467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913765,0.000024627012,0.007703229,0.00007529162,0.00030809254,6.970499e-7,1.543239e-7,0.000002100367,0.0005092654],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924866,0.0017056613,0.0005246646,0.00027102,0.0043000034,0.00071204576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99696654,0.000583275,0.00028639223,0.00028564344,0.0014098438,0.00046828517],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1143923,0.00006145443,0.00016740042,0.0025012465,0.0021198308,0.0010741935,0.001935279,0.000040484352,0.00012743866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049538836,0.00005056389,0.00005222237,0.003911081,0.0029724604,0.004007469,0.000056054603,0.0011280433,0.0000038202174],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024916193,0.0013271264,0.1575117,0.000011900922,0.000002427988,0.000032868928,0.21803382,0.000279383,0.05055681,0.15674813,0.0013458335,0.41412508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007712054,0.001534441,0.6919821,0.0005910091,0.0000047315207,0.00004675121,0.18393391,0.004019873,0.0012845919,0.05981182,0.0556729,0.0003466806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006733348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019611824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5344704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005180394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007212574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067451132","doi":"10.1002/tea.20139","title":"Toward a new conception of conceptions: Interplay of talk, gestures, and structures in the setting","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Gesture; Semiotics; Dialectic; Pragmatics; Meaning (existential); Linguistics; Multimodality; Interpersonal communication; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Embodied cognition; Relation (database); Discourse analysis; Meaning-making; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Communication; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07173442565241635,"score_gpt":0.4516413018848394,"score_spread":0.3799068762324231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067451132","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942418,0.0011440344,0.00056044594,0.0005668924,0.00012249188,0.00012847259,0.000001856611,0.0000018986666,0.0032321257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983785,0.000022705197,0.0013475074,0.00003721833,0.0001750331,0.0000018339441,5.0608486e-7,0.0000032082644,0.000033447006],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973918,0.00088086235,0.00048150294,0.00013975325,0.0008436104,0.00026247848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987922,0.0005947484,0.00027653822,0.00012549959,0.00016668513,0.00004435369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011661225,0.0000600968,0.00016652311,0.00075320544,0.00009851152,0.0000605327,0.00044443412,0.00004779013,0.000046011297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008692435,0.000038052025,0.00003907466,0.00061642565,0.0007383504,0.00034966785,0.000053629352,0.0009106134,4.7647092e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004852308,0.0004767602,0.1214836,0.00013176314,0.000030459954,0.0002963222,0.3032368,0.000295642,0.2417166,0.07504618,0.0029050598,0.25389558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002531801,0.00092754414,0.653965,0.00093787204,0.000016898864,0.0007698727,0.2504284,0.00021524806,0.003243058,0.08618743,0.00061014504,0.0001667141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023335686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016560248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53248143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005991199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017305113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4041571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071318150","doi":"10.1002/tea.1031","title":"Learning science through technological design","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":199,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Science education; Mathematics education; Curriculum; Science, technology, society and environment education; Learning sciences; Computer science; Sociology; Educational technology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Pedagogy; Engineering","score_opus":0.49509823182023927,"score_gpt":0.6152720530086239,"score_spread":0.1201738211883846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071318150","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90319407,0.00012211366,0.0063793883,0.015221937,0.0006050386,0.00017517734,3.9213102e-8,0.000036807272,0.07426543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98671067,0.0003039935,0.012162805,0.00007708555,0.00025285006,0.0000028517609,1.2415359e-8,0.0000035461974,0.00048618874],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99081355,0.0020020048,0.00042214277,0.00036531495,0.005079113,0.001317862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963733,0.0017623204,0.00020766331,0.00020961503,0.0010593052,0.00038780167],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.18123534,0.00007777664,0.00016348787,0.0023294524,0.00584735,0.00084796926,0.0031623784,0.000060929062,0.00012802494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048810177,0.000060720184,0.00004341625,0.009670457,0.0154684065,0.0038392097,0.00023214617,0.0027543092,0.000032508247],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007824152,0.00050633796,0.13635948,0.0000061697156,0.0000030105796,0.00032639585,0.19460475,0.002458771,0.043260895,0.30841637,0.00062204374,0.31335753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006047744,0.0009689197,0.021103421,0.00036166544,0.0000031849809,0.00044559131,0.7056279,0.0023589735,0.0026329882,0.090284854,0.17519684,0.00041087903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006769317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000059162878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51102316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010870738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007455136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072469164","doi":"10.1002/tea.20425","title":"Networks of practice in science education research: A global context","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Global Education and Multiculturalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Inyuvesi Yakwazulu-Natali; University of Toronto; Technische Universiteit Eindhoven; Purdue University; Seoul National University; Nanyang Technological University; Daegu University; University of Waikato","keywords":"Sociology; Salience (neuroscience); Dominance (genetics); Narrative; Community of practice; Science education; Participatory action research; Public relations; Global education; Context (archaeology); Citizen journalism; Pedagogy; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.2919265255655226,"score_gpt":0.5893953375517554,"score_spread":0.2974688119862328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072469164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86329514,0.00053417135,0.000017476596,0.0050687157,0.0009860101,0.00028683792,3.6611982e-7,0.0000046507453,0.12980664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99579316,0.00023683901,0.0035881172,0.000107175125,0.00016442852,0.0000040353484,5.6997955e-8,0.0000023790749,0.00010382206],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913871,0.00239213,0.0005735134,0.00028235876,0.004369849,0.0009950137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920913,0.0010283061,0.00032140533,0.00023076925,0.0058398037,0.0004884212],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1246101,0.00006730902,0.0001675987,0.0015856739,0.001189313,0.00031611786,0.002049072,0.00006384072,0.000028820748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07262216,0.000054826265,0.000038911287,0.008141037,0.007005217,0.0038129485,0.00022944645,0.0015447056,0.000006439503],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013362255,0.0014493741,0.024169892,0.0000134976435,0.000003682168,0.000030412504,0.56046206,0.0000884237,0.001891537,0.28634608,0.0012981738,0.12411327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042351012,0.0002498513,0.10099379,0.00067974767,0.0000026890445,0.000051791714,0.86666673,0.00028962112,0.00019651884,0.006580232,0.023736075,0.00012945199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04348063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039920704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30620468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021631927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01578498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99569714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078865404","doi":"10.1002/tea.20246","title":"Erratum: Student affect and conceptual understanding in learning chemistry","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Acronym; Affect (linguistics); Conceptual change; Science education; Educational research; Mathematics education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Sociology; Chemistry; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.2738281009696439,"score_gpt":0.5379201879679727,"score_spread":0.2640920869983288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078865404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58424705,0.004677296,0.000057226363,0.0018680453,0.008109988,0.00018628768,9.518593e-7,0.0000097362745,0.40084344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97581434,0.000488862,0.000120613666,0.000026024061,0.0010495108,0.000004464342,0.0000018156088,0.000016598953,0.022477746],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949735,0.0008493728,0.00072191167,0.00045004542,0.0020033047,0.0010019048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972781,0.0016808392,0.0004236233,0.00019762875,0.00020277349,0.0002170482],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038455628,0.00018979011,0.0004440738,0.0014810134,0.00051842525,0.0003901516,0.0010679637,0.00032630187,0.00009155384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022102678,0.0001615595,0.0000655122,0.0010496537,0.0022849631,0.00039528348,0.00029398658,0.010405524,0.0000035876649],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031506878,0.0006098324,0.25254163,0.00049852324,0.000102739345,0.0032996135,0.14656945,0.00042936657,0.001619276,0.026238492,0.5654319,0.0023441229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079354324,0.0005915381,0.06783503,0.0028001273,0.0000074236223,0.00055509334,0.8993935,0.000043483375,0.000008354605,0.0042261626,0.02341197,0.00033377655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034268227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000107599604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75282407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020740933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016258621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9918775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086427025","doi":"10.1002/tea.20412","title":"A study of laughter in science lessons","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Humor Studies and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Laughter; Seriousness; Phenomenon; Solidarity; Dialectic; Psychology; Complicity; Science class; Boredom; Curriculum; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Sociology; Science education; Social psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.47811673325523046,"score_gpt":0.6013513138150917,"score_spread":0.1232345805598612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086427025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9570659,0.00005220184,0.000021332633,0.00060692435,0.00012513195,0.00017614581,3.8607078e-7,0.0000021882136,0.04194981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999048,0.0000071230393,0.0008125084,0.000010403229,0.000035417936,0.000011554975,6.7347017e-9,0.0000034616605,0.00007150715],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971011,0.00031359447,0.0004629036,0.00024797666,0.0013158126,0.0005586047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889505,0.00022780261,0.00016503576,0.00032412045,0.00026275255,0.00012523314],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029501406,0.000054842316,0.00017725061,0.0019455039,0.00044176294,0.00004549883,0.0014709355,0.000017793745,0.000053285028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007730415,0.000040972514,0.000024970806,0.0029798187,0.0016737813,0.00030345458,0.00032708613,0.001054846,0.000009497509],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072003946,0.0041254763,0.5182928,0.000007841827,0.000009475673,0.00021699107,0.39470837,0.000016695069,0.009209962,0.05220224,0.00022026432,0.020917881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006702452,0.0006994407,0.7937293,0.00009407715,0.0000018487734,0.00004197039,0.20222923,0.000037207188,0.0002378842,0.001906627,0.0002894624,0.00006271524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012004562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035181775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2754365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017240504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003587644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091134906","doi":"10.1002/tea.20160","title":"Proliferation of inscriptions and transformations among preservice science teachers engaged in authentic science","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Science education; Psychology; Observational study; Nature of Science; Pedagogy; Chemistry; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.18984485819606348,"score_gpt":0.5316515786277104,"score_spread":0.34180672043164695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091134906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9817571,0.000056311128,0.00046651703,0.0021336395,0.00032268456,0.00030923903,4.222088e-7,0.0000073972847,0.01494667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980715,0.000039044437,0.001662551,0.000021631253,0.00008046051,0.0000039190004,7.152438e-8,0.0000030010162,0.00011781155],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919619,0.0013151442,0.0007703355,0.00033202185,0.004580809,0.0010398052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962886,0.0012517152,0.00026573776,0.00021651058,0.0014578268,0.0005195946],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2804037,0.000077313234,0.00016206506,0.0063925697,0.005214693,0.0006155771,0.0018839638,0.00004913755,0.000032370725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026672974,0.00006849969,0.000028960083,0.011191399,0.014716791,0.008150934,0.00012273515,0.0019643807,0.0000019476045],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021403217,0.00023302848,0.21619835,0.000017292956,9.216081e-7,0.0000041334692,0.68044883,0.00017185666,0.067123204,0.02215045,0.000017501286,0.013613021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036866832,0.00012756813,0.6137555,0.00023582176,0.000002214884,0.000011229113,0.3766984,0.0021942293,0.0030042485,0.0030230256,0.00046749943,0.00011157486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023608897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047532185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39755714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009982019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008563312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091496793","doi":"10.1002/tea.20169","title":"Student affect and conceptual understanding in learning chemistry","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Situational ethics; Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Chemistry; Chemistry education; Concept learning; Mathematics education; Feeling; Science education; Conceptual change; Cognition; Class (philosophy); Social psychology; Epistemology; Communication","score_opus":0.30360421365056633,"score_gpt":0.5717385533461283,"score_spread":0.268134339695562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091496793","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9496982,0.00012667957,0.0001094347,0.0045272033,0.00016889257,0.00006944005,5.2709087e-8,0.000004372188,0.045295708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990743,0.0000593687,0.00018947982,0.000018468389,0.0002453285,0.0000010762479,4.022934e-8,0.000002337615,0.00040959395],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99601585,0.0010245477,0.00028993338,0.00018267235,0.0019277097,0.0005592738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982761,0.0012424801,0.000119173004,0.00006177538,0.00012838827,0.00017205862],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.056031827,0.000050027556,0.000119287506,0.00069565227,0.0012375285,0.00040354196,0.0005698917,0.000040727846,0.00005078333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003832231,0.000044315242,0.0000207314,0.0014054036,0.0026851003,0.0008831124,0.000085764426,0.0014472973,0.0000014667845],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011035089,0.000106708336,0.8122298,0.0000071250474,8.903885e-7,0.000042798103,0.13810173,0.00057015766,0.010352268,0.036487523,0.00020514718,0.0018848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037428687,0.000071925024,0.065133214,0.00019408051,7.3643275e-7,0.000016884887,0.9252847,0.00024114567,0.00019814284,0.0049477867,0.0034475415,0.00008960064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018738838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012307289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7871829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012048536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015389884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9893364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093446643","doi":"10.1002/tea.10111","title":"Encouraging and analyzing student questions in a large physics course: Meaningful patterns for instructors","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Quarter (Canadian coin); Conceptual change; Concept learning; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Psychology; Science education; Variance (accounting); Conceptual framework; Mathematics; Sociology; Statistics","score_opus":0.16566097938181798,"score_gpt":0.5721715363524832,"score_spread":0.4065105569706652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093446643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99301827,0.00013135876,0.0025093588,0.0020960025,0.00048082092,0.0001736378,9.444737e-7,0.00000468815,0.0015849409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975691,0.00010542429,0.0020632867,0.000035452013,0.0001779806,0.00000539559,7.2206035e-8,0.0000039250117,0.000039365623],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961359,0.0011021163,0.00035198187,0.00021964534,0.0014792943,0.000711088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980945,0.0009726365,0.00016280146,0.0001079919,0.00040047982,0.00026156238],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.060287934,0.00006498601,0.00015399007,0.0009166648,0.0015658214,0.0004426789,0.0006012496,0.000033787743,0.000014607741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006517678,0.0000580696,0.000035060108,0.0016570722,0.0006721805,0.0013429786,0.00005541274,0.00093908166,5.4679197e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026292528,0.000118191856,0.8267261,0.0000060422526,0.0000016620914,0.0000056754684,0.09933136,0.00009329678,0.0003281906,0.065299995,0.00001563193,0.008071257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085566635,0.00014156863,0.3273928,0.00050490594,0.0000053134168,0.000021518596,0.64741445,0.0010505995,0.00012558907,0.017899105,0.0043927324,0.00019575136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007510977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023048434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5480831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052147446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023649116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096609684","doi":"10.1002/tea.21158","title":"Science language<i>Wanted Alive</i>: Through the dialectical/dialogical lens of Vygotsky and the Bakhtin circle","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogical self; Sociocultural evolution; Dialectic; Epistemology; Relation (database); Framing (construction); Sociology; Premise; Science education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14879158420901992,"score_gpt":0.5328279719277582,"score_spread":0.38403638771873827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096609684","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.941563,0.00023494875,0.008869655,0.0063116644,0.00046583064,0.00016127389,4.2993923e-7,0.000009950508,0.04238322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945985,0.00001192462,0.0047303922,0.0002701349,0.0002734738,0.0000030033755,4.2726093e-8,0.000007795502,0.00010474524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98637104,0.009893779,0.00059847103,0.0003473079,0.001996162,0.0007932691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98991334,0.0086477315,0.00035330333,0.0004453801,0.000547939,0.00009230659],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19057283,0.00010540298,0.00032580682,0.00080197543,0.0015426682,0.00022152098,0.0017216393,0.00005519689,0.00003095027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0376239,0.000052197825,0.00006898743,0.0032554832,0.013049043,0.00050304446,0.00035083076,0.0036018302,0.0000061729925],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005883325,0.0004884374,0.024588607,0.00002670147,0.000031284315,0.00005070269,0.20222452,0.0000826711,0.10626144,0.51912695,0.00038031559,0.14615005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0113999285,0.0039724386,0.7806869,0.0010965145,0.000050164097,0.00119222,0.10601584,0.005188831,0.006273262,0.06610846,0.017363058,0.000652354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006666702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008568721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75609833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106280524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045643002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110214764","doi":"10.1002/tea.20025","title":"Impact of a school district's science reform effort on the achievement and attitudes of third‐ and fourth‐grade students","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Supervisor; Curriculum; Psychology; Science education; Student achievement; Perception; School district; Academic achievement; Pedagogy; Political science","score_opus":0.21541150902367928,"score_gpt":0.5773881491558533,"score_spread":0.36197664013217407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110214764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.992288,0.00006963723,0.000021639396,0.004979298,0.00012465067,0.0002057955,8.6578484e-7,0.0000024088617,0.0023077007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991974,0.00021981064,0.00045874907,0.000030126033,0.00006555063,0.0000020469981,2.3916618e-8,0.0000022237073,0.00002406142],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940296,0.0003212083,0.00041516733,0.00022928312,0.004450253,0.000554531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980843,0.00051790586,0.0002971336,0.00021123426,0.0004821429,0.00040725843],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.060698867,0.00007703218,0.00017760695,0.0011730484,0.001688414,0.00039669927,0.0017479464,0.000029747293,0.000012702444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005620605,0.000043732052,0.00004912505,0.0024382204,0.0066987523,0.001282532,0.00026853103,0.00085343013,7.9402565e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032555727,0.0004111691,0.9345295,0.000010347707,0.000006142411,0.000003579143,0.027694317,0.00010929997,0.005624997,0.026573341,0.000012463783,0.0049923207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029432698,0.00057331525,0.9690008,0.00022998158,0.0000018796733,0.000008221036,0.0271284,0.000021086036,0.00040259154,0.0022548628,0.000035375822,0.000049142047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007104048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004437152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055078264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011986297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044965884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112973645","doi":"10.1002/tea.20271","title":"Written extended‐response questions as classroom assessment tools for meaningful understanding of evolutionary theory","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Schematic; Evolutionary theory; Mathematics education; Descriptive research; Computer science; Concept learning; Psychology; Science education; Knowledge level; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.40413621639738323,"score_gpt":0.5753339453363949,"score_spread":0.1711977289390117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112973645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.946898,0.00017012678,0.017616114,0.013576855,0.0007957097,0.00035266913,0.0000029313119,0.000013969824,0.020573627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988373,0.00011522694,0.010638153,0.000058190577,0.00023309591,0.000008580918,2.0238342e-7,0.0000052247055,0.0005683289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920259,0.003534147,0.0005419007,0.0002430447,0.002967558,0.00068743783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988552,0.009691461,0.0003039656,0.00019211769,0.0009266573,0.00033381445],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09775683,0.00007583769,0.00019446871,0.0017314003,0.0035093268,0.00022206231,0.0011543811,0.00006338473,0.00009680639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03537248,0.000065986635,0.000096907665,0.001766222,0.003639344,0.0024470775,0.000093166425,0.0009954907,0.0000032433886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033917945,0.0003339572,0.015776861,0.000010582185,0.000008050509,0.000027301192,0.07359872,0.00023187832,0.0068418197,0.8933582,0.0011631545,0.008310335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006633407,0.0008485359,0.094270736,0.00037173487,0.0000065502395,0.00014999583,0.5772742,0.0007976413,0.00014983684,0.31265292,0.012622862,0.0001916176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003834287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008455531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5807052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022357597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012841745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117021117","doi":"10.1002/tea.21132","title":"Death discussion in science read‐alouds: Cognitive, sociolinguistic, and moral processes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognition; Action (physics); Think aloud protocol; Variety (cybernetics); Creatures; Cognitive science; Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Social psychology; Philosophy; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.11660845860474081,"score_gpt":0.46986737072684054,"score_spread":0.3532589121220997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117021117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9767794,0.00039928246,0.00014820429,0.000579883,0.00023015052,0.00023013283,0.000001135709,0.0000074187647,0.021624373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986816,0.00005394634,0.0008127393,0.00005873505,0.00017954729,0.000013807124,2.8116943e-7,0.0000072531416,0.0001920698],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99636936,0.00049451663,0.00041834166,0.00037229038,0.0015692677,0.0007762387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99774784,0.0006151831,0.0001722396,0.00014066703,0.0010558509,0.00026822105],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019559545,0.00010128598,0.00020291771,0.0017835585,0.00059486803,0.00040398855,0.0006599769,0.000052196738,0.00009751129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011418434,0.00006017676,0.000024437642,0.001859961,0.0020848315,0.0013929391,0.0001854517,0.0013857674,0.000023361461],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002826955,0.0010304106,0.59232897,0.00018540614,0.000012544063,0.00062964915,0.13073236,0.00000829396,0.024586372,0.011911617,0.00026515854,0.2380265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002032009,0.00079394405,0.80653054,0.0020606352,0.000011142528,0.00044347448,0.12260618,0.00056162523,0.0012580297,0.06326435,0.00011856351,0.00031953337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006601713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004010644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23770697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020316582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090530503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117962730","doi":"10.1002/tea.20153","title":"Concept maps: Experiments on dynamic thinking","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Header; Focus (optics); Concept map; Task (project management); Mathematics education; Computer science; Psychology; Engineering; Physics","score_opus":0.2020900081355763,"score_gpt":0.5848167688805302,"score_spread":0.38272676074495393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117962730","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8973327,0.00017633135,0.00015960442,0.007984286,0.0012422756,0.00012683502,4.1961235e-7,0.000012692228,0.09296481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969999,0.000020729321,0.0014368447,0.0001361446,0.0004367678,0.0000020012756,1.5585762e-7,0.000004043228,0.0009634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.993579,0.0012124358,0.00037106578,0.00022689391,0.0038673228,0.00074329297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820685,0.0008507145,0.0001839489,0.00016501911,0.00036916978,0.00022430101],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046023093,0.00006689951,0.0001295662,0.0014191733,0.0024568327,0.0005839609,0.001554433,0.000046600697,0.0001010065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030897052,0.000055046967,0.00004739897,0.0017123935,0.0021286593,0.0012933463,0.000080353755,0.0012520166,0.000022880773],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006290646,0.00088721374,0.04997247,0.000008397002,0.000004594552,0.00013154703,0.3580615,0.0014194878,0.017705163,0.49927458,0.008108477,0.06436369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013759218,0.0007599519,0.052269947,0.00088895083,0.0000033392912,0.000053368352,0.66898483,0.0010755117,0.002538348,0.16723894,0.10430288,0.0005079853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028733518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043368273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33203563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010640302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022950098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122607195","doi":"10.1002/tea.20422","title":"Cultural diversity in science education through <i>Novelization</i>: Against the <i>Epicization</i> of science and cultural centralization","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Innovative Education and Learning Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Sociology; Science education; Unitary state; Cultural diversity; Face (sociological concept); Globalization; Epistemology; Social science; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Psychology; Anthropology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2730437705535902,"score_gpt":0.5127122237696398,"score_spread":0.23966845321604957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122607195","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96124536,0.00009399509,0.0002244759,0.0032821791,0.0006287446,0.00021566937,3.0816022e-7,0.000005470035,0.034303796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99709696,0.0002642636,0.0022739477,0.00019466071,0.00009701904,0.0000015458477,2.4537263e-7,0.0000025057898,0.000068866466],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948065,0.0007682811,0.0004282734,0.00025878765,0.0032238802,0.00051425275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99355954,0.00031423813,0.0005181064,0.00015271016,0.0053212103,0.00013419539],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0494649,0.00007202012,0.000119947465,0.0012445356,0.005009833,0.0004618589,0.0015336182,0.0000327697,0.0000138459345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021682719,0.000050187817,0.000017579416,0.0103175035,0.014838182,0.009277386,0.00035290196,0.00074445497,0.0000010526109],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001919412,0.00022269228,0.23292764,0.000012272798,0.000001385112,0.0000010131671,0.559253,0.00010339852,0.009014961,0.19074914,0.00017377925,0.0075215637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035687812,0.00010546766,0.3331999,0.00037329164,0.000004436235,0.000010879495,0.6505459,0.00057070586,0.003582059,0.0038408327,0.007243338,0.00016629006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003668262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029190458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1869083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008242364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008239976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147442928","doi":"10.1002/tea.1040","title":"Learning to teach science in urban schools","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":154,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Sociology; Teacher education; Professional development; Ethnography; Teaching method; Psychology","score_opus":0.09133853791712378,"score_gpt":0.49926919141250153,"score_spread":0.40793065349537777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147442928","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9467391,0.0000748984,0.00014219772,0.009276224,0.00033632776,0.0002219663,1.3674818e-7,0.000018670582,0.04319048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962213,0.000081162674,0.002533543,0.000079502475,0.00035994168,0.0000035324726,3.7600767e-8,0.0000071661784,0.00071382744],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896496,0.0024171511,0.00058796507,0.0004461488,0.005452102,0.0014470335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970417,0.0006914596,0.00018376476,0.00022817428,0.0011605198,0.00069439766],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.17137423,0.00010666391,0.00024528318,0.005728054,0.004542659,0.0010057975,0.002539529,0.000057349203,0.00002934151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04333546,0.000092106864,0.00004277639,0.013658354,0.0020837842,0.003459255,0.00062414305,0.004103035,0.000022929033],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009064614,0.00024385647,0.65523577,0.000005338864,0.0000011903674,0.0002039577,0.19463488,0.0016123208,0.05360804,0.009103276,0.0007056599,0.084555045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001359053,0.0017369397,0.25120404,0.0021018083,0.0000028611548,0.00007485747,0.5566835,0.0030772553,0.0008236709,0.006170323,0.17616871,0.00059696287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035234522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013062275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40403172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004414613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005782582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147458616","doi":"10.1002/tea.20352","title":"To be or not to be? Discursive resources for (Dis‐)identifying with science‐related careers","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Formative assessment; Performative utterance; Science education; Discourse analysis; Pedagogy; Sociology; Discursive psychology; Psychology; Mathematics education; Epistemology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.16869427959641264,"score_gpt":0.4646931946023418,"score_spread":0.2959989150059292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147458616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9617687,0.00009322629,0.00015951891,0.024340445,0.00023365868,0.00036682803,0.0000074460336,0.000013025394,0.013017187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99467707,0.000007016679,0.0024396568,0.00061065383,0.0003011384,0.000007680701,2.033583e-7,0.000010016969,0.0019465558],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99450123,0.00014702548,0.0004978888,0.00042645683,0.003427165,0.0010002088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973698,0.00043712565,0.00019217937,0.00029904797,0.0013026062,0.0003992042],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019108968,0.00014944751,0.00033895968,0.003479959,0.0029389071,0.0017814011,0.0017781223,0.000019293522,0.00007167198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00445343,0.00008826199,0.00009170418,0.0016263627,0.002623586,0.0019110728,0.00026602592,0.0007515565,0.0000038447797],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000492285,0.0001709507,0.00045286666,0.000024571058,0.00005056464,0.0001893257,0.9311225,0.0014440315,0.0059669614,0.034786697,0.0025983953,0.022700852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068376766,0.002691448,0.0029998934,0.0009554689,0.000043684024,0.00003884281,0.97094965,0.00032926793,0.0010978521,0.0013616538,0.018509412,0.0003390554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029508956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022677712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039827157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005025004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064280065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148398013","doi":"10.1002/tea.21078","title":"Interpreting Student Views of Learning Experiences in a Contextualized Science Discourse in Kenya","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Kenya; Pedagogy; Science education; Mathematics education; Kali; Sociology; Nature of Science; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.23544101660320563,"score_gpt":0.6104382556159458,"score_spread":0.3749972390127402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148398013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9829927,0.00019076269,0.000060189413,0.0031013596,0.0005155909,0.00032114203,6.391354e-8,0.0000048028946,0.012813374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988344,0.00008106806,0.0008147086,0.00003987119,0.00008100848,0.000023270726,2.3154557e-8,0.0000038172484,0.00012185398],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906013,0.0026286484,0.0010248956,0.00039045644,0.0042358763,0.0011188239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99657965,0.0016453412,0.00046403613,0.00019579727,0.00074921484,0.00036594225],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11979566,0.00009895728,0.00033096934,0.004016532,0.0010734242,0.00064834056,0.0028333084,0.000046329027,0.00019244938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02537827,0.00007854306,0.000053516564,0.0062865,0.008226287,0.004060116,0.00031756746,0.0018139689,0.000008115569],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010950859,0.00016425188,0.3051607,0.0000045408124,4.7381258e-7,0.0000081941635,0.6602669,0.00015554475,0.008619835,0.0030459005,0.000017732276,0.022544984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030386247,0.0001375863,0.06077168,0.0005595054,3.83613e-7,0.0000050415,0.93546474,0.0012065349,0.00031654414,0.0007337699,0.00041103218,0.000089295834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008456322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028393846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27519786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009957978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048165484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151170333","doi":"10.1002/tea.10071","title":"Theoretical perspectives on learning in an informal setting","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Museums and Cultural Heritage","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":227,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Formative assessment; Constructivist teaching methods; Informal learning; Constructivism (international relations); Mathematics education; Interpretation (philosophy); Psychology; Class (philosophy); Restructuring; Knowledge base; Concept map; Pedagogy; Teaching method; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.09026530449468509,"score_gpt":0.4106018060777642,"score_spread":0.32033650158307914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151170333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83439296,0.00004213424,0.000002816102,0.00034137897,0.000075709184,0.000043858538,1.2737986e-7,0.000004960627,0.16509604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99934995,0.000010316344,0.00027931918,0.000029697378,0.0001713805,9.3816436e-7,5.2558683e-8,0.000004273857,0.00015408987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760103,0.00055295863,0.00028340594,0.00013090299,0.00097370194,0.00045798637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992423,0.00025509764,0.00007642311,0.00007972617,0.00022360405,0.00012282684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018717648,0.00006416454,0.00011648303,0.0006931926,0.0007499901,0.00059890584,0.00036011878,0.000020643782,0.00043025534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002111625,0.000042080464,0.000033765573,0.00019389302,0.0011476087,0.0017570236,0.00004014207,0.0020681347,0.0000055466658],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019048737,0.00006381364,0.0029168571,0.0000043396735,6.588008e-7,0.000031918153,0.18179247,0.00015418378,0.000413102,0.8103645,0.0000065728595,0.004232569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004876516,0.0012195143,0.005508736,0.0004182097,8.7917385e-7,0.00004176435,0.96986204,0.002172105,0.00013049427,0.011313183,0.008696957,0.00014844684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000039435046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010142207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7990513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012533632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019597907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8985131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151323772","doi":"10.1002/tea.10109","title":"The value of an emergent notion of authenticity: Examples from two student/teacher–scientist partnership programs","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Curriculum; General partnership; Science education; Value (mathematics); Property (philosophy); Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Face (sociological concept); Epistemology; Norm (philosophy); Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Social science; Political science","score_opus":0.34853020034477866,"score_gpt":0.5852288606081715,"score_spread":0.2366986602633928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151323772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919364,0.00017914921,0.00017946238,0.0012231574,0.000879164,0.00021609584,5.7524744e-7,0.0000049068863,0.005381074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978982,0.00006282271,0.001583104,0.000009390057,0.0002001375,0.0000033721328,2.7493508e-7,0.000004064369,0.00023861951],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98885226,0.004746108,0.0007289029,0.00027876266,0.004670561,0.00072337786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969561,0.0010776048,0.0005083949,0.00031713242,0.0007852536,0.00035548187],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10395431,0.00007756128,0.00019176486,0.0006344154,0.0019214203,0.000425124,0.0019467706,0.00004051429,0.00006217592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008763176,0.0000539363,0.00008097381,0.0022070096,0.0038496032,0.001126693,0.00009036303,0.00079683255,0.0000022967347],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038929466,0.0011136575,0.42660135,0.0000107846345,0.000014168855,0.0000069540806,0.27462125,0.0003112348,0.01286746,0.19019978,0.000079139194,0.0941353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007532068,0.00058370485,0.23483545,0.00029649754,0.0000146684615,0.000007696085,0.7088099,0.0012486238,0.0032399797,0.03263997,0.017365452,0.00020486995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067444122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039986526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43418863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031240773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002543207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153579845","doi":"10.1002/tea.10018","title":"Lessons on and from the dihybrid cross: An activity–theoretical study of learning in coteaching","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Reflective Practices in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Psychology; Mathematics education; Subject matter; Subject (documents); Teaching method; Pedagogy; Epistemology; Curriculum; Computer science","score_opus":0.2406407258679001,"score_gpt":0.5956801122643562,"score_spread":0.35503938639645616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153579845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98583126,0.000060708015,0.000045388537,0.004938656,0.00016090744,0.00020021084,2.400696e-7,0.000004557223,0.008758082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993123,0.00008172129,0.00036851567,0.000015033936,0.00019185552,0.0000029688815,2.3164604e-8,0.000005647383,0.000021941907],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98852843,0.008047249,0.0003474359,0.00027578184,0.0023445103,0.0004565668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922782,0.006839487,0.00029404895,0.00019842872,0.00023675176,0.00015304648],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06645493,0.000070692346,0.0001760233,0.00068208325,0.0016377766,0.000580195,0.0009857715,0.000040905215,0.000033269345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029685376,0.00005061766,0.00002251623,0.0011154304,0.0026161117,0.0023699624,0.00015312199,0.0034324056,0.0000015713458],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080491984,0.0012067741,0.6005393,0.000002302829,0.0000045304664,0.000019130786,0.28636268,0.0008062279,0.002991013,0.010892591,0.000006133888,0.09708877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073407305,0.0014169646,0.6552212,0.00027698572,0.000005275412,0.000008950235,0.32164538,0.006943593,0.00022775412,0.01298466,0.00041323723,0.00012191633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00507421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013067926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09696685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052693015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033250454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169310428","doi":"10.1002/tea.20008","title":"Scientists' views of science, models of writing, and science writing practices","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":167,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Scientific writing; Professional writing; Science education; Science communication; Ambiguity; Perception; Scientific literacy; Technical writing; Science, technology, society and environment education; Sociology; Nature of Science; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Mathematics education; Computer science; Higher education; Political science; Engineering; Linguistics","score_opus":0.2310648360709079,"score_gpt":0.4966819380656629,"score_spread":0.265617101994755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169310428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9260435,0.0012890436,0.000110361354,0.0005138238,0.00018681114,0.00010601488,0.0000020543996,0.0000043356667,0.071744025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944002,0.00012908851,0.0052206623,0.00001611058,0.00016121569,0.0000014449644,3.9527475e-8,0.000005535322,0.00006569119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927635,0.0001729504,0.00093739526,0.00040781006,0.0049348567,0.0007834797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949677,0.00045014085,0.0013412451,0.0003214174,0.002715882,0.00020364526],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08272054,0.00011284369,0.0003820486,0.004935667,0.002776424,0.0010866361,0.0019924957,0.000016040538,0.000022348691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0083920965,0.000083242325,0.000070514,0.0025474315,0.04431341,0.0079634385,0.00078151404,0.00082431064,8.482435e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022511966,0.0003626978,0.0040363553,0.00015564404,0.000017130304,0.00005241554,0.17118117,0.0015098993,0.07309827,0.73194003,0.000028508117,0.01759538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014588264,0.0010927619,0.0044711647,0.0053481674,0.00006183249,0.00021078388,0.8842718,0.0074986494,0.020828912,0.07334433,0.0009280135,0.00048475817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007821426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030505462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71309066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028625721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024047017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324169338","doi":"10.1002/tea.21318","title":"Visualizing biological data in museums: Visitor learning with an interactive tree of life exhibit","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Animal and Plant Science Education","field":"Psychology","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Visitor pattern; Gesture; Tree (set theory); Visualization; Baseline (sea); Computer science; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Human–computer interaction; Artificial intelligence; Biology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.29702353948145593,"score_gpt":0.5375220269685731,"score_spread":0.24049848748711716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324169338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99661547,0.000052033494,0.000701389,0.0009034454,0.00019805785,0.00007639472,0.0000018586389,0.000004664959,0.0014466998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983346,0.000018130175,0.0013878066,0.000016276359,0.00019937489,0.0000014634294,5.2608027e-7,0.0000039622496,0.00003787719],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99643934,0.0013089287,0.00044151416,0.0003626556,0.0009670132,0.00048057045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973271,0.0016704756,0.0003082815,0.00027357598,0.00020952741,0.00021103596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027248818,0.00007500262,0.00020404384,0.001273046,0.00018876007,0.00007744052,0.0015055123,0.000048240825,0.00007875329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050005144,0.00003932047,0.000017521861,0.0010393875,0.000781183,0.002300448,0.00022509239,0.001104343,0.000008938184],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008898925,0.00041378522,0.83141124,0.0000059363374,0.0000057838533,0.00007368021,0.015945707,0.000018153396,0.08639022,0.0011736541,0.00006504746,0.06360688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010735948,0.0039881314,0.9106887,0.0011253246,0.0000021237852,0.00018271845,0.079886325,0.0011621753,0.00054687914,0.0005203194,0.00065603,0.00016769927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050584355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001298523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08584334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015915457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055814505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9443951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328888181","doi":"10.1002/tea.21319","title":"Exemplification in science instruction: Teaching and learning through examples","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Exemplification; Argumentation theory; Scientific literacy; Mathematics education; Conceptual change; Science education; Concept learning; Psychology; Generalization; Reading (process); Nature of Science; Computer science; Pedagogy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.18838735983687666,"score_gpt":0.515397402302112,"score_spread":0.3270100424652353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328888181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98354334,0.00022364299,0.0017905318,0.0016967275,0.00022095688,0.00008132057,1.8015301e-7,0.000012417447,0.01243086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968243,0.000047518453,0.00265558,0.000030766038,0.00014923769,0.0000052764276,4.3303622e-8,0.0000072745247,0.0002800084],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99572855,0.0013935693,0.00043150623,0.00042307252,0.0013593233,0.0006639608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977293,0.0013347821,0.00023116647,0.00014735748,0.00042162102,0.00013576585],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.045436077,0.000091068505,0.000168523,0.0017518363,0.0014449671,0.00026967423,0.000718401,0.00004557868,0.000033354034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01215828,0.00006064206,0.00002080357,0.0016066867,0.0024190743,0.0026486625,0.0002102245,0.002722702,0.0000125117],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007288662,0.00009679951,0.1667159,0.000016023729,0.0000023917519,0.00003422997,0.02795287,0.000017586044,0.05481666,0.016709851,0.000011637246,0.7335532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022659765,0.0011635706,0.85571367,0.002169099,0.000003967317,0.0008058585,0.104526855,0.00016117745,0.0017912902,0.024597785,0.006476953,0.00032377543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005002598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020908124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7332294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028656935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045993726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604565736","doi":"10.1002/tea.21396","title":"Toward a durable prevalence of scientific conceptions: Tracking the effects of two interfering misconceptions about buoyancy from preschoolers to science teachers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Scientific misconceptions; Conceptual change; Task (project management); Science education; Psychology; Mathematics education; Concept learning; Tracking (education); Cognition; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Scientific literacy; Pedagogy; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.2339594008709526,"score_gpt":0.547832849953404,"score_spread":0.3138734490824514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604565736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98952293,0.00033134487,0.0005111771,0.004215447,0.0020134943,0.00044268937,0.0000030900965,0.000007669166,0.002952129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971676,0.00009740382,0.002121534,0.000024245612,0.00022689259,0.000012753581,5.615533e-8,0.000005647155,0.0003438534],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99267906,0.0011219038,0.00071671413,0.0005010806,0.0040593133,0.0009219585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99425775,0.001983561,0.0007820313,0.0008279603,0.0016546631,0.000494011],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.060699347,0.00011514123,0.00026756254,0.001551088,0.008144039,0.0018859169,0.0066452017,0.000044253826,0.00008250996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051231638,0.000086875116,0.000102202066,0.0027482985,0.019472983,0.0043863202,0.00049499347,0.0012985836,0.0000063697553],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002549418,0.0001842398,0.15162772,0.00007755168,0.000007333167,0.0000063319626,0.44279316,0.00045794502,0.36088094,0.007962988,0.00015864692,0.035817645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010171246,0.00045199518,0.6824,0.005635466,0.000026391104,0.000012950858,0.25769827,0.00075625494,0.04269565,0.0068934355,0.0020651033,0.0003473612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056056413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00072850764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53077227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064009364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058824406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768667567","doi":"10.1002/tea.21430","title":"The influence of instruction, prior knowledge, and values on climate change risk perception among undergraduates","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Climate change; Perception; Psychology; Risk perception; Sample (material); Knowledge level; Social psychology; Mathematics education; Ecology","score_opus":0.47000331486140556,"score_gpt":0.5695468158969711,"score_spread":0.09954350103556553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768667567","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99096555,0.00013776067,0.0000021054495,0.0036767866,0.00016161076,0.00016156484,0.0000010701277,0.000005202409,0.004888325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96820885,0.0314259,0.00015871816,0.000007181254,0.00016607573,0.0000045745833,8.253353e-8,0.0000034528036,0.000025137891],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969873,0.0012454101,0.00030752923,0.00013097488,0.0009902618,0.0003385686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975342,0.00085311057,0.0005105761,0.00035561202,0.000621027,0.00012546258],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.035921253,0.000057127538,0.00011503715,0.00047241818,0.008057441,0.0005996615,0.0012038616,0.000046060835,0.00000502507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006967162,0.000039375223,0.0000343094,0.0003215966,0.004682574,0.001813884,0.0002806562,0.00084817765,0.0000032574724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000448151,0.000066295404,0.52784216,0.00001912038,0.0000024730036,8.812863e-7,0.10227135,0.000018502811,0.0013734763,0.0063103857,0.000020969415,0.36202955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018665897,0.000105618215,0.9585002,0.00041492915,0.0000022104798,0.000002408279,0.034609806,0.0003109984,0.000015110242,0.0052159913,0.0005925927,0.000043469103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023983328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004102698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.430658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027070602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016752252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99802613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768850143","doi":"10.1002/tea.21425","title":"The contribution of science‐rich resources to public science interest","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"TheMuseum","funders":"","keywords":"Science education; Psychology; Diversity (politics); Metropolitan area; Demographics; Perception; Cognition; Social psychology; Demography; Sociology; Geography; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.7513706013868204,"score_gpt":0.6362287240479799,"score_spread":0.11514187733884051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768850143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9365601,0.00007552407,0.00003626428,0.038973078,0.00047236646,0.00017923566,5.5926523e-7,0.0000055001706,0.023697395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99895567,0.00046356046,0.00030527086,0.000033808483,0.0001644036,0.0000031151574,4.56351e-8,0.0000026365267,0.00007146893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99340314,0.0007446926,0.00047378274,0.00024056654,0.0041950005,0.0009428148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99366486,0.00088796084,0.0005025642,0.00079358055,0.0036797845,0.000471274],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.18492141,0.000060366987,0.0001422648,0.0020781497,0.021051945,0.0035972006,0.0089076245,0.000033044806,0.000018017536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07406545,0.000041161315,0.00003998237,0.0032838401,0.033758514,0.0038842654,0.0013288405,0.0009138757,0.000008520878],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009214681,0.00021716118,0.104653254,0.000008450902,0.0000031367379,0.0000062028835,0.16155772,0.000013241403,0.21965376,0.2715582,0.00027649984,0.24196023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073960534,0.0006058843,0.56593883,0.00093784154,0.000004049654,0.000024322308,0.29715002,0.000990079,0.0038076332,0.014920992,0.114599526,0.0002812195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011431561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044911033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46128556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012683796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032319599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895256255","doi":"10.1002/tea.21467","title":"Individual and collective agencies in China's curriculum reform: A case of physics teachers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Agency (philosophy); Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Context (archaeology); Negotiation; Professional development; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.2382011090146312,"score_gpt":0.5218439405786254,"score_spread":0.28364283156399417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895256255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97587067,0.00016013556,0.000019849123,0.00071814255,0.00022659954,0.00008715875,8.525074e-7,0.0000038053722,0.022912811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981133,0.000034019937,0.0013571037,0.000009424295,0.0003467127,0.0000017289818,3.1895215e-8,0.0000038273633,0.00013390613],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967459,0.0008727876,0.00034680692,0.0001809225,0.0013122692,0.0005413491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987621,0.00034122408,0.00019322164,0.0001006185,0.00036719404,0.00023564704],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031904567,0.000065482614,0.00020839726,0.0010464743,0.0011485416,0.00011727766,0.00054616615,0.00005656737,0.000008246653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045265756,0.000053301388,0.000034575583,0.0023648106,0.0043251286,0.0007588554,0.000114470306,0.0012681743,6.799425e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016381962,0.00019872884,0.07406587,0.000010129172,0.000005096874,0.00020794048,0.88938475,0.0000058939463,0.00038066352,0.0072593032,0.0002491186,0.028216098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051855686,0.0008731927,0.03455736,0.00030571362,0.000005341282,0.00019664103,0.94926333,0.00018173113,0.00012365026,0.012788791,0.0010453674,0.00014033481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02156194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043718056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059878543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020048379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034814617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99838454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897423990","doi":"10.1002/tea.21523","title":"Evaluating the effects of analogy enriched text on the learning of science: The importance of learning indexes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Education and Early Childhood Development","funders":"Sixth Framework Programme; European Commission","keywords":"Analogy; Conceptual change; Reading (process); Concept learning; Psychology; Test (biology); Mathematics education; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Epistemology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2132627396254807,"score_gpt":0.5610157559815953,"score_spread":0.34775301635611455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897423990","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98952836,0.00044409093,0.000044087737,0.002451253,0.00039644205,0.00017480507,1.242378e-7,0.0000024415504,0.006958368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99947566,0.000029787903,0.0001737421,0.000034406854,0.00015443326,0.0000056125186,3.7073914e-8,0.000004846095,0.00012150055],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940043,0.0024153467,0.0006353027,0.00021529575,0.0022121712,0.00051759055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98690283,0.010716818,0.0009418334,0.0003539587,0.0010316699,0.000052907293],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07950629,0.000083154315,0.00022475803,0.0006211377,0.00147217,0.00007931532,0.0020862988,0.00004091436,0.000047769503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031958472,0.000037195154,0.00006864082,0.0023541518,0.010353596,0.00026837378,0.00025458826,0.0020348215,0.000002138373],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019000085,0.00018278744,0.5891805,0.00007014018,0.0000339791,0.0000063956145,0.062763505,0.0027593367,0.2264942,0.10344485,0.00015981797,0.014714444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034009863,0.0045363638,0.83822423,0.00050525327,0.000009864193,0.00005764074,0.13968763,0.0019786847,0.0048782458,0.0095911855,0.00010930647,0.00008150787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032920737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017098839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24904369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012789834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001122515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962744571","doi":"10.1002/tea.21586","title":"An online categorization task to investigate changes in students' interpretations of organic chemistry reactions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Categorization; Curriculum; Set (abstract data type); Chemistry; Task (project management); Mathematics education; Reactivity (psychology); Psychology; Concept learning; Computer science; Pedagogy; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.16946401834738847,"score_gpt":0.5505185873432168,"score_spread":0.38105456899582835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2962744571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99125624,0.000013137135,0.00015186181,0.0066275806,0.00033421625,0.00016253877,0.0000010461083,0.000004968954,0.0014483945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998613,0.000037354483,0.0007952486,0.0000738738,0.0001278675,0.0000025023696,7.022901e-7,0.0000036638723,0.0003457961],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99657774,0.0006848924,0.00037399947,0.00019479032,0.0018031689,0.0003653818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834305,0.00039634982,0.00019301324,0.0001826907,0.0005765406,0.00030832746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024542267,0.000050592713,0.00013109544,0.0012943912,0.0003642407,0.00019183541,0.0013017394,0.000041621362,0.00018049544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061718374,0.000046581346,0.00001753036,0.0034834363,0.00058877264,0.0011514926,0.00008058397,0.000777462,0.0000075524677],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000123078535,0.0003730367,0.3683831,0.000016349468,0.0000016899088,0.0000026100831,0.16376083,0.0007650107,0.46079215,0.0014001159,0.000027936601,0.004464827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005856948,0.00052787835,0.32708874,0.00080159504,0.000004111792,0.0000151613385,0.6522139,0.0018596558,0.007525503,0.004323969,0.004801902,0.0002519539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021112498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066078478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.488453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055570033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002471551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8505908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118200454","doi":"10.1002/tea.21678","title":"Editors' report: Reflections for the <i>Journal of Research in Science Teaching</i> (2015–2020)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; University of Massachusetts Boston; Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey; University of Missouri; University of Montana; Syracuse University","keywords":"Science education; Mathematics education; Educational research; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.4180721690196503,"score_gpt":0.6376624201663403,"score_spread":0.21959025114669006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118200454","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61537045,0.0007068951,0.0026786954,0.34708026,0.013001279,0.0009889281,0.0000024306403,0.00002093543,0.020150147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867814,0.00022974864,0.0035410023,0.00022028109,0.008956604,0.000007651393,7.7192276e-8,0.000009270097,0.0002539519],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9816101,0.004374098,0.0014215102,0.0005013383,0.010322009,0.0017709272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98408765,0.009165773,0.0007831328,0.00043625568,0.0044992818,0.0010279135],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.37817326,0.00011791717,0.00030627256,0.0032074573,0.0072228396,0.0010792201,0.005093943,0.00009188775,0.00004076602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.117577404,0.00008234471,0.000119570555,0.0106781805,0.009078394,0.0035447602,0.00037884014,0.005988553,0.000006734782],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059651583,0.0009629821,0.041244727,0.00008114686,0.000018319999,0.00058458437,0.69804645,0.002111897,0.05412292,0.028355397,0.12370584,0.050169203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086126226,0.0014346341,0.0061563454,0.00053150934,0.000009146684,0.0007209198,0.553463,0.001728623,0.0007749894,0.011624649,0.42244557,0.00024936997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024448829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010422259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37141097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015644518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021955846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163486026","doi":"10.1002/tea.21695","title":"“Anybody can do science if they're brave enough”: Understanding the role of science capital in science majors' identity trajectories into and through postsecondary science","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Career Development and Diversity","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Science education; Identity (music); Outreach; Science communication; Science, technology, society and environment education; Social science education; Sociology; Outline of social science; Capital (architecture); Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07774665484752874,"score_gpt":0.41450979269619165,"score_spread":0.3367631378486629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163486026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9790426,0.00043526187,0.00008022061,0.0018160511,0.00076984486,0.00026248963,0.000003408995,0.000010754183,0.017579406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997938,0.00017900136,0.0017142766,0.00004475907,0.0000934516,0.0000016394697,9.387248e-8,0.0000058737414,0.000022953289],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98353755,0.0005111333,0.00067941955,0.000998892,0.01230729,0.0019657041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943892,0.00086802384,0.00039117588,0.0005099383,0.0031840198,0.0006576416],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11982473,0.00019169768,0.00036197502,0.003987316,0.014388134,0.004171754,0.0066118385,0.000061716986,0.000032438325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01538626,0.00015254723,0.00007023075,0.022613654,0.09770682,0.019219354,0.0029714005,0.001642364,0.0000014005655],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025316172,0.00008966002,0.10193983,0.000017484479,0.0000025736113,0.0000930541,0.5144874,0.000037317088,0.14110512,0.23934524,0.0000035748803,0.0028534837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034354112,0.00011210435,0.10130615,0.00031264237,0.0000044105764,0.00006722419,0.7739729,0.00015520833,0.017745845,0.105708025,0.00005043339,0.00022150726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013636211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012617383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25948554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00596054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050296772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99876285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164786649","doi":"10.1002/tea.21714","title":"Science engagement as insight into the science identity work nurtured in community‐based science clubs","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Club; Enthusiasm; Science education; Context (archaeology); Identity (music); Psychology; Pedagogy; Sociology; Social psychology; Medicine; Geography","score_opus":0.346290947944668,"score_gpt":0.5952801136289666,"score_spread":0.24898916568429857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164786649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9249558,0.00023193513,0.00016046359,0.02139502,0.0020961124,0.0003093213,2.4382865e-7,0.00001599979,0.050835118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99567676,0.00009717409,0.002993046,0.0007761979,0.00022772829,0.000009084149,1.0992803e-7,0.0000067338283,0.00021319953],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97286993,0.0060421657,0.0009586296,0.00086236274,0.016851362,0.002415534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98884976,0.0034729252,0.00043368703,0.0011975467,0.004953081,0.0010930068],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.40310916,0.0001753997,0.00029504523,0.008154222,0.026454315,0.0054722894,0.013371894,0.00006673037,0.00010797388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.095431335,0.00013275382,0.00008325894,0.06785672,0.06253526,0.0116671,0.0017872972,0.0056012003,0.00003211274],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004282993,0.00085630623,0.05280021,0.000018638159,0.0000019312517,0.00010167434,0.59939724,0.0007361145,0.10299898,0.22003593,0.00010854168,0.022901628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010371035,0.00043854475,0.18618628,0.0011656113,0.000006817268,0.000060730563,0.72647744,0.0015219037,0.020935202,0.040200043,0.021385355,0.0005849648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007506592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005272267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30767784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050697126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09412089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99910253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232749568","doi":"10.1002/tea.21184","title":"Issue Information","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Educational Practices and Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Library science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.2900696946960087,"score_gpt":0.5984484644482622,"score_spread":0.3083787697522535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232749568","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008283559,0.0024005626,0.000019438416,0.0366714,0.006111022,0.00017391743,0.0000030261529,0.000003597612,0.94633347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8369965,0.016574843,0.0038373324,0.00043308295,0.014819162,0.000014574118,0.000007993227,0.000024807308,0.12729171],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917875,0.0014287289,0.00055305345,0.00013404255,0.0054910956,0.00060558115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950511,0.0011262165,0.0006377011,0.0001683845,0.0026252088,0.0003913921],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09211988,0.00008768047,0.00021966711,0.0021844401,0.0011120009,0.00093211717,0.0017321119,0.00015941958,0.0006541359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011382638,0.00007326384,0.000051429106,0.0012622343,0.0012395589,0.0062996917,0.00015777278,0.0034033153,0.00175948],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028182903,0.00011065231,0.000108148815,0.00006413919,0.0000074100853,0.000008089176,0.12437534,0.00018487388,0.000015100822,0.0077890554,0.81597257,0.05133644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087268265,0.00007864104,0.0000583948,0.00029781274,0.0000015949397,0.0000064889114,0.12808563,0.000014766393,0.000002629101,0.0017479998,0.8695502,0.000068564485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032826313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032380153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82871294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015376353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013499321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236520640","doi":"10.1002/tea.21448","title":"Issue Information","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Information retrieval; Library science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.15107893287506258,"score_gpt":0.3917977804189803,"score_spread":0.2407188475439177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236520640","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049693743,0.0012921261,0.0001551278,0.00063000084,0.016767742,0.00013383657,0.00008566289,0.0000028994132,0.97596323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09896419,0.0022852637,0.002786124,0.00024860734,0.003120725,0.000008796728,0.0000070420156,0.000023812898,0.8925554],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973411,0.00006523229,0.0012484307,0.0002967046,0.00038075252,0.00066778035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979267,0.00015620612,0.0010465613,0.0003172032,0.00038963856,0.00016367139],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.036480453,0.00012982819,0.00052828586,0.0047396016,0.00055504317,0.00079968513,0.001599311,0.00011657099,0.00916853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019535401,0.00012486806,0.0001110919,0.0010273678,0.0012400671,0.0031753094,0.00044883133,0.001524654,0.12421356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011130033,0.000027496426,0.00035264232,0.000042799074,0.000012869909,0.000003187862,0.0033663367,0.000075751945,0.0000030480699,0.0044373516,0.9897995,0.0018678831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023186023,0.00010022363,0.00018635349,0.00021445502,8.543239e-7,0.000009602844,0.0025690382,0.00033535872,0.000011422406,0.0020715531,0.99414027,0.00012903922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030931967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004633315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11504503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090698135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004399689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99214613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238494294","doi":"10.1002/tea.21463","title":"Issue Information","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Library science; World Wide Web; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.15107893287506258,"score_gpt":0.3917977804189803,"score_spread":0.2407188475439177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238494294","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049693743,0.0012921261,0.0001551278,0.00063000084,0.016767742,0.00013383657,0.00008566289,0.0000028994132,0.97596323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09896419,0.0022852637,0.002786124,0.00024860734,0.003120725,0.000008796728,0.0000070420156,0.000023812898,0.8925554],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973411,0.00006523229,0.0012484307,0.0002967046,0.00038075252,0.00066778035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979267,0.00015620612,0.0010465613,0.0003172032,0.00038963856,0.00016367139],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.036480453,0.00012982819,0.00052828586,0.0047396016,0.00055504317,0.00079968513,0.001599311,0.00011657099,0.00916853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019535401,0.00012486806,0.0001110919,0.0010273678,0.0012400671,0.0031753094,0.00044883133,0.001524654,0.12421356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011130033,0.000027496426,0.00035264232,0.000042799074,0.000012869909,0.000003187862,0.0033663367,0.000075751945,0.0000030480699,0.0044373516,0.9897995,0.0018678831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023186023,0.00010022363,0.00018635349,0.00021445502,8.543239e-7,0.000009602844,0.0025690382,0.00033535872,0.000011422406,0.0020715531,0.99414027,0.00012903922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030931967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004633315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11504503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090698135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004399689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99214613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280642105","doi":"10.1002/tea.21778","title":"Gender representation and academic achievement among <scp>STEM‐interested</scp> students in college <scp>STEM</scp> courses","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Career Development and Diversity","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; Raikes Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Graduation (instrument); Representation (politics); Mathematics education; Psychology; Academic achievement; Gender gap; Women in science; Mathematics; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.19342014989259082,"score_gpt":0.4656698606519581,"score_spread":0.27224971075936727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280642105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936796,0.00032181496,0.000022272267,0.0006186,0.0005977647,0.00046219313,0.0000060564494,0.000013784051,0.0042779385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979144,0.0002003752,0.00013953556,0.00006513689,0.00010225793,0.000012119213,6.197489e-7,0.000007666096,0.0015579191],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893724,0.002334934,0.00063003105,0.00044225043,0.0062765833,0.0009438088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967937,0.0019365952,0.00037474846,0.0001690521,0.0003183077,0.00040763395],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048001036,0.00012980473,0.00028370915,0.0021698338,0.0025158098,0.00043793113,0.001970255,0.00007645083,0.000009159767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025788285,0.00012836828,0.000065653745,0.002602055,0.0010781604,0.0019664168,0.0015650215,0.0025306127,0.0000031566199],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008996566,0.000118300595,0.91725284,0.000012001264,0.000010478468,0.00020720379,0.07707847,0.00014253007,0.0005256525,0.0009875656,0.0027769178,0.00087905885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006846155,0.00009593712,0.59862787,0.00010760189,0.0000050919643,0.000018746628,0.39686748,0.00012397203,0.000115081406,0.0006906329,0.0026264917,0.00003651036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016669614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010148986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.319789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019146416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013676994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362476010","doi":"10.1002/tea.21863","title":"Qualitatively recognizing the dimensions of student environmental identity development within the classroom context","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Vancouver Island University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Environmental education; Vignette; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Agency (philosophy); Context effect; Pedagogy; Sociology; Geography; Social science","score_opus":0.13080899998005183,"score_gpt":0.46497104400215034,"score_spread":0.3341620440220985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362476010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959916,0.000055574917,0.00006952997,0.0029214332,0.00017027794,0.00030094138,8.629359e-7,0.000004889207,0.00048488262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988869,0.000049759165,0.0007373599,0.00010069055,0.000019661245,0.000011517119,3.0172203e-7,0.000006333052,0.00018749802],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941549,0.0014187442,0.00072033337,0.00025688554,0.0029851212,0.00046403418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979075,0.0012695265,0.0003342222,0.0003087235,0.000028287683,0.00015170782],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.051795464,0.00009938365,0.00016050128,0.0002756751,0.0012884472,0.00010965989,0.0014511086,0.000028722548,0.000103743616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016332587,0.00005062454,0.00006387033,0.0012618158,0.0031185877,0.0009846573,0.0010435411,0.0011177537,0.00007799059],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035895693,0.0005240542,0.7776567,0.000013403324,0.000015452739,0.000020614887,0.1595066,0.0024317205,0.032787945,0.0011471331,0.000536181,0.025324304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017755156,0.00007870282,0.7324811,0.000045770328,0.0000023764528,0.000010971881,0.26181018,0.00026257566,0.0012577922,0.002821796,0.0009872342,0.000063936066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023438608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016138692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.102303565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015578679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025977954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380789944","doi":"10.1002/tea.21881","title":"Rebuilding relations and countering erasure through community‐driven and owned science: A key tool to Inuit self‐determination and social transformations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Indigenous Studies and Ecology","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Makivik Corporation","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Indigenous; Sociology; Equity (law); Community of practice; Context (archaeology); Science education; Traditional knowledge; Situated; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Political science; Engineering; Ecology; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.16760562009889618,"score_gpt":0.5324390322921899,"score_spread":0.36483341219329374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380789944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99155205,0.000023570896,0.00021344435,0.006657211,0.000165465,0.00042324618,0.0000041932612,0.000018015708,0.0009427801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99664825,0.00013774929,0.0029700182,0.00010218276,0.00008952292,0.000016417574,2.2296193e-7,0.0000054243365,0.000030192243],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971164,0.00071362156,0.00044600555,0.00014293894,0.0007600658,0.0008209934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805415,0.0010379979,0.00013095714,0.00008865919,0.00058436167,0.000103861676],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035926517,0.00006789306,0.00018067619,0.0012702176,0.02355784,0.00014977487,0.00030934237,0.00006401898,0.0000042089537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018980814,0.000056617595,0.000013734865,0.0015279,0.0007126676,0.0015763523,0.0005223973,0.0020249295,0.0000032190208],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015852147,0.000021584874,0.024391346,0.00010149812,0.0000037005009,0.0000048604616,0.96465397,0.00006437619,0.004174142,0.0016351626,0.000104365776,0.0048291674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009806121,0.0005550579,0.3153779,0.00068296655,0.000009955905,0.00006825717,0.66438633,0.011763587,0.00001876854,0.003234196,0.002747808,0.00017455997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005660405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026667824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3002676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085100724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010690703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99271655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384300943","doi":"10.1002/tea.21886","title":"Connected by emotion: Teacher agency in an online science education course during <scp>COVID</scp>‐19","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Communication in Education and Healthcare","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China","keywords":"Psychology; Collegiality; Feeling; Agency (philosophy); Teacher education; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Social psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.27656546420935474,"score_gpt":0.5917927684214613,"score_spread":0.3152273042121066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384300943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98696786,0.0004281012,0.00002122147,0.007736989,0.0009564112,0.00025155922,0.0000031962477,0.00003858865,0.0035960462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99700385,0.000115303315,0.0008887633,0.0001614928,0.0002485161,0.000015658903,0.000006007096,0.000012779385,0.0015476287],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946068,0.0015999142,0.0007487888,0.0004367632,0.0017278336,0.0008799026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967412,0.0007958782,0.00032469217,0.0007555414,0.0007118724,0.0006708297],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031969864,0.00010813676,0.00018860638,0.0037593695,0.0012593943,0.0002713244,0.0022216542,0.000079807956,0.00013079858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075400514,0.00010468816,0.000035469988,0.0074079363,0.001263487,0.0014693855,0.000241531,0.0024535896,0.000039257822],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026883406,0.0030707815,0.73734075,0.00006811997,0.0000047643825,0.000035510453,0.15789858,0.00020384435,0.033878617,0.006712452,0.009570997,0.05118872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042850233,0.0001358496,0.87241644,0.00018870206,0.0000013091156,0.000073935895,0.1216185,0.00081555196,0.000034923953,0.0010913822,0.0031386437,0.000056277513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007703275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025848657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13507567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013544457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007952487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388423314","doi":"10.1002/tea.21912","title":"“Things your history teacher won't teach you: Science edition”: Black women science teachers as anti‐racist teachers","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Critical Race Theory in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Science education; Curriculum; Pedagogy; Teacher education; Sociology; Narrative; Focus group; Psychology; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.1148118344804511,"score_gpt":0.503542162728267,"score_spread":0.38873032824781595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388423314","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9162553,0.000099476485,0.000053310374,0.012752633,0.0025524823,0.00042885807,0.0000012751822,0.00014915652,0.06770754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992034,0.00010451157,0.0009836734,0.00022557293,0.0012977644,0.000025091558,5.5677776e-7,0.00003753939,0.0052912706],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9771112,0.0022453517,0.0011932271,0.0012897773,0.013679972,0.0044804784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99195445,0.0016620256,0.0005704243,0.00090868224,0.0025621424,0.0023422732],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2964035,0.0003241524,0.0005277369,0.009186852,0.0067176917,0.0017717343,0.007290332,0.0001935214,0.00040253514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10084946,0.0003073607,0.00015118242,0.01491134,0.053417202,0.012929432,0.00091568753,0.0054024956,0.00036097807],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043340766,0.0005511952,0.008667725,0.000025241041,0.000008179176,0.00011472691,0.84167933,0.00024866874,0.065583095,0.053885866,0.0037739284,0.025418684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062560185,0.00039302258,0.019099286,0.0004599106,0.000011409558,0.0000681403,0.8950205,0.0011465134,0.0008144827,0.034030944,0.047730155,0.0006000307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017007466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000059857914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19555403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028286118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026105495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388593814","doi":"10.1002/tea.21914","title":"Crossing boundaries between research and practitioner communities: The role of research use and cross‐community journal authorship","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Educational research; Practitioner research; Medical education; Sociology; Psychology; Public relations; Pedagogy; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.6073560288602701,"score_gpt":0.618531997902137,"score_spread":0.011175969041866907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388593814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99044836,0.0011004966,0.000011394126,0.0053863563,0.00023717084,0.00015869232,0.000005842215,0.000008846029,0.0026428467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986544,0.00019497293,0.00042092832,0.000009729553,0.0003076878,0.000007634611,9.353021e-7,0.0000119409415,0.0003917447],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.980308,0.014369784,0.00075443275,0.0001818368,0.0031714088,0.0012145672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96705806,0.028757636,0.00028873095,0.00052577624,0.00308887,0.00028090598],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24447873,0.00010284781,0.00026020015,0.0026824963,0.020669274,0.009833379,0.0017359806,0.00012638594,0.000029394549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015544533,0.00006948377,0.000042345433,0.0029063663,0.03309409,0.0027082947,0.0011012446,0.0124421725,0.000003939741],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019436431,0.00016650095,0.75936055,0.00006233846,0.000031809202,0.000043269916,0.18405317,0.000034013246,0.0010133628,0.04920969,0.0012338083,0.0045971205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017304624,0.0004213634,0.529524,0.00029859276,0.0000015551235,0.0002604953,0.33237582,0.000032556076,0.000051099596,0.13280727,0.0040069977,0.000047156096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01368523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005719501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22983652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031783333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002524848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9928827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404142428","doi":"10.1002/tea.22001","title":"Evidence of graphical literacy in students' oral presentations: An example from undergraduate chemistry education","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo","keywords":"Mathematics education; Science education; Scientific literacy; Literacy; Chemistry education; Chemistry; Psychology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.37606264017442165,"score_gpt":0.6348201804315392,"score_spread":0.25875754025711756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404142428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907589,0.0010867708,0.00017517064,0.0060195997,0.0006445621,0.00013163633,4.4156238e-7,0.0000075457892,0.0011753865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99770015,0.00043480308,0.0013144684,0.000029155504,0.00029360485,0.0000066226944,4.761475e-7,0.0000036226525,0.00021706289],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943275,0.0014676715,0.00052644213,0.0003049933,0.002964618,0.00040878996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966537,0.0021901424,0.0001326596,0.00020416161,0.0005375215,0.00028185503],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039310038,0.00006230303,0.00014258546,0.0012805493,0.00046570745,0.00092655345,0.0015696879,0.000048347436,0.00010128726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004711678,0.000054428267,0.000043073225,0.003614476,0.001354746,0.0043960367,0.000101398946,0.0011751249,0.0000032728954],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060914314,0.0009779932,0.47382045,0.000067152476,0.0000066189546,0.000029954143,0.35945916,0.00012325303,0.023657594,0.0211375,0.0004964633,0.12016295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005408299,0.00029085015,0.32983473,0.0053800223,0.000010784374,0.00002518108,0.48653024,0.0032426352,0.001518891,0.16578722,0.0065128524,0.00032576168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037330877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002313815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14464971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040755462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069183516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410519181","doi":"10.1002/tea.70009","title":"A Multimodal Interactive Framework for Science Assessment in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Educational Games and Gamification","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Institute of Education Sciences; University of Georgia; U.S. Department of Education","keywords":"Generative grammar; Science education; Mathematics education; Computer science; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Psychology","score_opus":0.18736759512643644,"score_gpt":0.595336900515216,"score_spread":0.4079693053887796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410519181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82065004,0.000088006454,0.15863083,0.01726305,0.0007519069,0.0003959211,0.0000016460108,0.000001437453,0.0022171456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94626343,0.000007540038,0.053460922,0.00010533772,0.000106503634,0.000035590117,1.6303683e-7,0.0000021355283,0.00001838323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971089,0.00060930353,0.0005584479,0.00025353878,0.0010977086,0.00037214448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99496263,0.0036024738,0.00025141443,0.00024233366,0.00089012797,0.000051030136],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03654504,0.00006101463,0.00014131685,0.0013528452,0.00035498932,0.00017425061,0.0013666861,0.000037474725,0.000014825024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057126214,0.00004158431,0.00004509243,0.0026820137,0.0014927965,0.0005218996,0.000089534755,0.0019839117,0.0000011092415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010188308,0.00055527687,0.005432772,0.00000911161,0.000005272635,0.0000030271578,0.049240306,0.00056004594,0.009335008,0.80411303,0.000035894933,0.13060838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019623355,0.0005755742,0.25275132,0.00082107796,0.0000045630877,0.000016254095,0.22720173,0.018021116,0.004783697,0.49533302,0.0001958012,0.0000996152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019249166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031582385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049734674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020657443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9920796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413436829","doi":"10.1002/tea.70018","title":"Pedagogy of Whole Languaging Hearts: Fostering Relational Ways of (Re)Connecting to the Land With Multilingual Refugee Children","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Refugee; Pedagogy; Sociology; Translanguaging; Mathematics education; Psychology; Linguistics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.23178504387828372,"score_gpt":0.5762890225184342,"score_spread":0.3445039786401505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413436829","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96888053,0.00009824281,0.00027846286,0.022423062,0.00012387469,0.00016261521,0.0000013802769,0.000004858314,0.00802699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952906,0.0000043768955,0.0040799542,0.00027679247,0.0002485247,0.0000012584287,1.8925807e-7,0.000003812679,0.00009452379],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997364,0.0005109706,0.0004091596,0.00014424414,0.0012018088,0.00036983142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977522,0.0012557763,0.00021023133,0.00015761703,0.00052082137,0.000103370825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020420378,0.0000564596,0.0001581712,0.0009971767,0.0007814738,0.00008597331,0.0006474793,0.000035874586,0.000013193305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008110419,0.00003867494,0.000037665373,0.0013547201,0.00052006333,0.00034913397,0.00016524339,0.0008801177,0.0000010497196],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012856814,0.0001596337,0.3951773,0.000056495683,0.000025685933,0.00001072327,0.44986326,0.0073424825,0.0067015104,0.012201562,0.00021148796,0.1281213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002603514,0.0007900491,0.45752072,0.004873159,0.000028688924,0.00009029641,0.454871,0.0036598996,0.009182119,0.0031356036,0.06277925,0.00046571504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041926834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018513415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12765558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017548173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020557572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9709515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}