{"meta":{"query_hash":"288e345fbf7c","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Responsible Innovation"},"cohort_total":16,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":16,"exported":16,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/288e345fbf7c","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Responsible+Innovation"},"results":[{"id":"W2057874443","doi":"10.1080/23299460.2015.1010769","title":"Responsible to whom? Seed innovations and the corporatization of agriculture","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"St. Thomas University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporatization; Politics; Agriculture; Business; Corporate governance; Sociology; Marketing; Economics; Political science; Management; Market economy; Ecology","score_opus":0.04682900314807744,"score_gpt":0.26740571229813237,"score_spread":0.22057670915005492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057874443","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12920891,0.0047618663,0.0155981295,0.037091624,0.00034190825,0.00008100682,0.000066045264,0.00007065338,0.8127799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803843,0.0010751237,0.0012920965,0.0013461898,0.00009562207,0.00004084429,0.0000150940095,0.000036665875,0.015714077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923592,0.0036387525,0.00025308435,0.0010820105,0.00195983,0.0007070706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98156583,0.013257874,0.0015251297,0.0018458399,0.0012749657,0.00053038046],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009868779,0.00023510399,0.00030071038,0.0014403475,0.008612436,0.008697211,0.0010226893,0.0021423774,0.0029293087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015380555,0.00025504167,0.0001922099,0.0018919988,0.053396728,0.006489686,0.0035562431,0.0032782664,0.0002755958],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062141453,0.000004960575,0.0005189284,0.000026480746,0.0000023797857,0.00009179372,0.03788665,0.000078225785,0.00019966322,0.9544074,0.0009678905,0.005809376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027727989,0.000031577605,0.0048045996,0.0006473523,0.000020308684,0.0002311467,0.04318498,0.00083777885,0.0015881172,0.4850929,0.46348655,0.00004689527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03458403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045859087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99138755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020636132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010737117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14972633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283481250","doi":"10.1080/23299460.2015.1091252","title":"Responsible innovation: an approach for extracting public values concerning advanced biofuels","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","topic":"Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Genome Canada","keywords":"Deliberation; Sustainability; Biofuel; Responsible Research and Innovation; Upstream (networking); Business; Corporate governance; Environmental economics; Economics; Political science; Public economics; Marketing; Engineering; Public relations; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.17485715300295038,"score_gpt":0.40174547947315564,"score_spread":0.22688832647020526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283481250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4148881,0.0006910292,0.31040937,0.036171272,0.0003704639,0.0061817607,0.0004137617,0.00021084303,0.23066334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89504904,0.00024738014,0.09588203,0.001367651,0.000046922818,0.003481688,0.00009485135,0.000041827694,0.0037884915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.92194015,0.06530633,0.0015312361,0.002659749,0.006637715,0.001924746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83737934,0.13241036,0.008530104,0.010461313,0.00910635,0.002112549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.073709615,0.0012170689,0.0009331173,0.0076591456,0.009312321,0.011306769,0.002947097,0.004517579,0.0073275464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.096029095,0.0006415466,0.0012397959,0.0046436195,0.028624456,0.016426628,0.015562169,0.006432618,0.0006129184],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037054106,0.00083601876,0.014188415,0.00090070296,0.000095317075,0.00065539,0.2913084,0.001845154,0.002314463,0.5863743,0.0023129538,0.09879846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023292511,0.0003786498,0.0057688486,0.0007949915,0.000104487954,0.0002021931,0.27779633,0.006127774,0.004345661,0.6467562,0.057349287,0.00014269039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034161217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005951777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073709615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0135029815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018613098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38981837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943373442","doi":"10.1080/23299460.2019.1608615","title":"A responsibility to commercialize? Tracing academic researchers’ evolving engagement with the commercialization of biomedical research","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Commercialization; Ambivalence; Engineering ethics; Graduate students; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Medical education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Medicine; Marketing; Business; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.7522981823481073,"score_gpt":0.6398383169243247,"score_spread":0.11245986542378261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943373442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9570514,0.0010891,0.0028418216,0.02414779,0.00008980244,0.00005901284,0.000019195626,0.000019018818,0.014682807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99750334,0.00044820504,0.00060254347,0.00081714516,0.000024611767,0.00002201231,0.000008287208,0.0000070345773,0.0005668467],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.90752524,0.06816457,0.003302065,0.002700247,0.0127538415,0.005554032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7205257,0.19372654,0.035482705,0.008192938,0.021709373,0.020362752],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.091872446,0.0002628313,0.00050370925,0.0037700152,0.011024337,0.021600796,0.002330832,0.0048886943,0.0013471922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17901643,0.00062159303,0.00044058004,0.0044673155,0.021051463,0.011506772,0.011319335,0.0070946417,0.00028146405],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009320277,0.000108449734,0.03962487,0.0001464269,0.000033206023,0.0007140474,0.9104002,0.00012501048,0.0015962879,0.027878834,0.0015202434,0.017759217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019234963,0.00008574442,0.013330274,0.00017273257,0.000013899579,0.0005321784,0.9479402,0.000579503,0.0007698797,0.007936759,0.028559806,0.000059790673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004871882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050917077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98897564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0102674635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015730714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48587376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964873025","doi":"10.1080/23299460.2019.1622952","title":"When desirability and feasibility go hand in hand: innovators’ perspectives on what is and is not responsible innovation in health","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Responsible Research and Innovation; Stakeholder; Field (mathematics); Business; Marketing; Disruptive innovation; Public relations; Knowledge management; Engineering ethics; Political science; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.2820673124970468,"score_gpt":0.43489011074985473,"score_spread":0.15282279825280792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964873025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59199166,0.005701332,0.039507687,0.27661765,0.0008647052,0.0003330321,0.000044829198,0.000090330104,0.08484881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923652,0.00045500294,0.0021893622,0.0041853166,0.00007058739,0.000051656625,0.00000559331,0.000022177313,0.00065517955],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.74515647,0.20455939,0.0070280503,0.007118854,0.026764909,0.009372373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.589041,0.35045904,0.018607948,0.010179399,0.021968039,0.0097445175],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.23367184,0.0005719706,0.0011477951,0.0031857146,0.012819253,0.02189514,0.003358889,0.012076485,0.0016000272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26570553,0.00096620363,0.0012155459,0.0014926149,0.08590589,0.020007167,0.013823723,0.016779274,0.00022096696],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088519264,0.00008993768,0.013314713,0.00032807916,0.000075163945,0.0008001497,0.8281057,0.0003785819,0.0011416129,0.1380773,0.0020094544,0.01559088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007978854,0.00026136468,0.008674691,0.001299237,0.00008683262,0.0011444336,0.7701827,0.0019149991,0.0011111189,0.1515742,0.06344487,0.00022573156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008553781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060532917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23367184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015663818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024425715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94501907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3083296747","doi":"10.1080/23299460.2020.1804293","title":"A cross-dimensional analysis of nanotechnology and equality: examining gender fairness and pro-poor potential in Canada’s R&D landscape","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","topic":"University-Industry-Government Innovation Models","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Workforce; Equity (law); Gender equity; Gender equality; Inequality; Gender gap; Political science; Sociology; Economic growth; Economics; Demographic economics","score_opus":0.06021471573103094,"score_gpt":0.26488882494298915,"score_spread":0.20467410921195822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3083296747","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8795526,0.0015786827,0.001192137,0.0049962276,0.000028031121,0.000062062434,0.0010559146,0.000012749726,0.11152165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976447,0.00024888327,0.0002973081,0.00014265694,0.0000045963607,0.000009647914,0.000091120106,0.000004308117,0.0015567027],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949242,0.0007594549,0.0001504979,0.00030010167,0.0026843473,0.0011813532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98392916,0.004637756,0.0023986807,0.00045277522,0.0068776202,0.0017040992],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004453867,0.00015028569,0.0003439114,0.01145156,0.0073045655,0.009675524,0.0006641061,0.00056638155,0.0045880363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01547075,0.00010389819,0.0003090273,0.014964219,0.0055975216,0.0022078657,0.004721104,0.000651556,0.0001451028],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022985002,0.000093630464,0.6044604,0.000392399,0.00016534887,0.00057932833,0.075150944,0.0026059772,0.0018101836,0.20364659,0.0077275755,0.10313776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008890528,0.000044921893,0.7863525,0.00039427826,0.0000875896,0.00012652334,0.1454614,0.0027921943,0.000898779,0.017233372,0.04653255,0.000067027395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8489427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8972809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99554616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04239498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05077831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30759853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107130505","doi":"10.1080/23299460.2020.1844954","title":"Predictive rebound & technologies of engagement: science, technology, and communities in wildfire management","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","topic":"Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies","field":"Energy","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Predictive analytics; Predictive value; Value (mathematics); Work (physics); Analytics; Risk analysis (engineering); Big data; Data science; Computer science; Management science; Business; Economics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning","score_opus":0.029992732014873957,"score_gpt":0.2731802916222591,"score_spread":0.24318755960738514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107130505","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18872967,0.004735326,0.280411,0.08301337,0.0007205503,0.00026223192,0.00017667218,0.00035719527,0.441594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98727,0.00069843367,0.007960078,0.0007279435,0.000070722446,0.00007853671,0.000024597997,0.000034468747,0.0031352353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922667,0.005453242,0.00016128761,0.0005982655,0.00096128695,0.0005591204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97846335,0.015345925,0.0018320152,0.0019556624,0.0012421188,0.0011609839],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010446107,0.00066782825,0.00040032092,0.002316652,0.0055732667,0.014541748,0.0016851962,0.00452526,0.009429058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022089005,0.00045604564,0.000583549,0.0017969478,0.026191315,0.020603653,0.014658598,0.005275766,0.00094970374],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007722571,0.00011119462,0.003950805,0.00018292203,0.00002685567,0.0003381809,0.025464144,0.0050936462,0.0005105401,0.92016363,0.003541656,0.040539216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016364927,0.000074015945,0.0014042484,0.000420759,0.00001832694,0.00022274657,0.02864439,0.010172177,0.0007505884,0.90770525,0.05051723,0.000053860123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002846401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002612174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9944267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004752046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003136496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055244923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107364085","doi":"10.1080/23299460.2020.1844974","title":"The responsible innovation in health tool and the need to reconcile formative and summative ends in RRI tools for business","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Formative assessment; Summative assessment; Responsible Research and Innovation; Transparency (behavior); Face (sociological concept); Public relations; Business; Knowledge management; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Engineering; Pedagogy; Social science","score_opus":0.33217134538613347,"score_gpt":0.43063818500984025,"score_spread":0.09846683962370678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107364085","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1194777,0.0014637929,0.6376688,0.09097385,0.001214927,0.005584391,0.00080635824,0.0032266453,0.13958353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56280935,0.00052631897,0.4239336,0.0035430542,0.00021892272,0.0049569197,0.00041862423,0.00032863172,0.0032645673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.5157304,0.4022213,0.023522167,0.0060698376,0.046022817,0.006433455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.23210134,0.6547106,0.02416348,0.0479864,0.034628768,0.0064094514],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.37495342,0.0014981612,0.0020486114,0.015161456,0.005405541,0.02538398,0.0046006893,0.0038724416,0.0044604368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.44877455,0.00090273004,0.0018318825,0.007511779,0.025350872,0.026580237,0.023823302,0.0075147087,0.0010877884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022985286,0.0008287359,0.022600962,0.0029736722,0.00015807735,0.00042815265,0.13441548,0.0030774397,0.0015778481,0.43055645,0.011159856,0.39199346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019843197,0.0007584907,0.016969018,0.008399286,0.00014010261,0.00051303353,0.09513292,0.015672954,0.0070302086,0.72213984,0.13237308,0.00067256216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032977827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003662205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99459445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01700458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03949027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77079374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285030928","doi":"10.1080/23299460.2022.2091311","title":"Trust, trustworthiness, and relationships: ontological reflections on public trust in science","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Phenomenon; Trustworthiness; Situated; Epistemology; Foundation (evidence); Express trust; Public trust; Sociology; Bureaucracy; Social psychology; Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Politics; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.14014175581385957,"score_gpt":0.3928602569775393,"score_spread":0.2527185011636797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285030928","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.084639005,0.03601977,0.23532602,0.3349938,0.0022398953,0.0001707472,0.00018859659,0.00015482762,0.3062674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807163,0.005242869,0.008356475,0.0028194727,0.00074194954,0.00013248099,0.000031129886,0.00005697648,0.0019023712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96753526,0.02266686,0.0019494959,0.001725202,0.0046113706,0.0015118602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9278476,0.055974443,0.005919203,0.00465093,0.0039888187,0.0016189534],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033955585,0.0006914031,0.0013254584,0.005859803,0.009530742,0.02209896,0.002606399,0.009981548,0.0025523421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048502706,0.0007678311,0.0012717405,0.005657115,0.10907243,0.04212369,0.013748974,0.011060304,0.00040138463],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006169831,0.000007240888,0.00017929192,0.000041433177,0.0000057195093,0.000060809904,0.012856154,0.00015017921,0.000029013952,0.9847173,0.0003131777,0.0016334137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048231304,0.00000989896,0.00021238955,0.00014097674,0.000007515372,0.00007997772,0.0048943353,0.0005072102,0.00005285216,0.9848074,0.009267798,0.00001487398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007359225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003081242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9904693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013613495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066178874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17957646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317896878","doi":"10.1080/23299460.2023.2167572","title":"Governing gene-edited crops: risks, regulations, and responsibilities as perceived by agricultural genomics experts in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","topic":"CRISPR and Genetic Engineering","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Columbia University","keywords":"Responsible Research and Innovation; Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Agriculture; Corporate governance; Genomics; Political science; Business; Biotechnology; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Biology; Computer science; Genetics","score_opus":0.012582711127334072,"score_gpt":0.2919576991255534,"score_spread":0.27937498799821936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317896878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93876153,0.0012172266,0.0011570668,0.026022661,0.00010078434,0.00010369461,0.00010780847,0.000025342484,0.03250381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99416995,0.00037324644,0.0003493089,0.0018012392,0.000005649015,0.00001297455,0.000025787158,0.000007916857,0.003253884],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9794728,0.0055912496,0.000751122,0.0015149009,0.005591522,0.007078329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95102173,0.023008186,0.0037979058,0.00077050633,0.010972216,0.010429455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01687684,0.00043128952,0.0004501596,0.0020824813,0.03408816,0.008920472,0.0018822217,0.0033734431,0.0025456888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031024199,0.00055897626,0.00036507368,0.0023642057,0.016276652,0.00211639,0.0063551217,0.0044963136,0.00014789571],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002380515,0.000083782186,0.074194424,0.00029084686,0.000049712446,0.0028133725,0.8503749,0.0010648993,0.004567242,0.026533866,0.008254827,0.0315341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002379999,0.000055348355,0.036201797,0.00028882307,0.000035241665,0.00024096861,0.8830653,0.0010035697,0.0010493876,0.0038044374,0.074008174,0.00022322389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96973294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98135924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1152947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1152947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2097666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83652556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386182285","doi":"10.1080/23299460.2023.2243122","title":"Mobilizing capital for responsible innovation: the role of social finance in supporting innovative projects","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","topic":"Community Development and Social Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Venture capital; Corporate governance; Portfolio; Business; Impact investing; Set (abstract data type); Investment (military); Social responsibility; Finance; Public relations; Political science; Emerging markets","score_opus":0.07152545765536325,"score_gpt":0.3229141353435301,"score_spread":0.25138867768816686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386182285","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85113525,0.00085855497,0.0179236,0.013511226,0.00007264795,0.0002433206,0.00007718996,0.00006192949,0.116116285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99846363,0.00010957309,0.0006878339,0.00011183028,0.000016421009,0.000017026236,0.000007674244,0.000002750446,0.0005833311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944876,0.0032031666,0.00014465209,0.00021568395,0.00070320995,0.0012457124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9649639,0.018119086,0.008167118,0.0012004015,0.0020340695,0.0055153654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076827635,0.00031962228,0.0003326024,0.002038953,0.001961289,0.005730124,0.0006907916,0.0013141067,0.0053684115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038225684,0.00014835219,0.00023970926,0.0008095387,0.00411096,0.0033127377,0.0052280384,0.0010890518,0.00032381198],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039733248,0.0011456225,0.32153237,0.00037290747,0.00018167862,0.001976435,0.016776297,0.0067750323,0.0017788672,0.35714433,0.0074537657,0.2844653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034048667,0.00090641674,0.29696465,0.0018325181,0.00022713578,0.0013829854,0.042336926,0.023491371,0.0028281002,0.49752384,0.1319813,0.00018425671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022603031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039025669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076827635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002770382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055763624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040630877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392346224","doi":"10.1080/23299460.2024.2304383","title":"The need for more inclusive deliberation on ethics and governance in agricultural and food biotechnology","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"National Institute of Food and Agriculture; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Deliberation; Agricultural biotechnology; Corporate governance; Agriculture; Political science; Engineering ethics; Biotechnology; Environmental ethics; Biology; Economics; Management; Engineering; Politics; Ecology","score_opus":0.034416719563457196,"score_gpt":0.3077037304010524,"score_spread":0.2732870108375952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392346224","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021385554,0.0049998397,0.0902678,0.7954135,0.0024642802,0.0003381203,0.000033474247,0.00014453407,0.08495295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74899316,0.003745492,0.08291506,0.14563724,0.0020734926,0.001247297,0.000077090626,0.00021546254,0.015095741],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7939331,0.16305946,0.0064051445,0.008701452,0.017778674,0.010122206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7217165,0.21471012,0.013540504,0.019765187,0.013810121,0.016457526],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1993041,0.0007449637,0.0020959894,0.0030823953,0.018778274,0.03824625,0.003879778,0.030013507,0.0039675958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13327363,0.0009987535,0.0018453854,0.0021529621,0.108086586,0.041742083,0.025006033,0.03596252,0.0008834889],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016864746,0.00007608198,0.0006238216,0.00011131295,0.000023471835,0.0001584714,0.02400696,0.00067068805,0.0003188791,0.95394534,0.007906195,0.012141818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017623639,0.00003075514,0.00047639673,0.00038127226,0.000009472035,0.00008964099,0.012135541,0.00049385184,0.0002646319,0.89703953,0.08900472,0.000056503897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047005424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052041123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1993041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016096756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042728428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9874006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402515964","doi":"10.1080/23299460.2024.2392305","title":"If you are for market creation, you should be for market destruction! Ethics and the relations between exnovation and innovation for changing direction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","topic":"Sustainability and Climate Change Governance","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Responsible Research and Innovation; Industrial organization; Economics; Marketing; Public relations; Political science","score_opus":0.06297347742976542,"score_gpt":0.33564409006810336,"score_spread":0.2726706126383379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402515964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09259331,0.005826903,0.11901609,0.1702338,0.0009653695,0.000078305304,0.000062815576,0.00012336294,0.61109996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9668747,0.0011014545,0.010026381,0.0055801435,0.00028187002,0.000093696064,0.000016692293,0.000057154888,0.015967892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98996514,0.005940747,0.0003399999,0.0011350723,0.0017218293,0.0008973161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9815632,0.01068213,0.0018787186,0.0030050897,0.0019928669,0.000877994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014746933,0.0003471851,0.00047509922,0.001011394,0.0045151603,0.008798146,0.0009892224,0.004969429,0.006236216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017306793,0.00024389189,0.0007958785,0.0005352433,0.04574931,0.011762152,0.004157728,0.0056599085,0.0008556805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007664855,0.000008359314,0.0002658781,0.000017377504,0.0000027530496,0.000033613134,0.0006050443,0.00011710106,0.00013577018,0.9960091,0.00055362907,0.0022437426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057777897,0.000012947814,0.00041980954,0.00006608699,0.000003770221,0.00006329979,0.00059313,0.00039893182,0.00039663955,0.97529525,0.022732154,0.000012322719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077331817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008812215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014746933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029401598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026579064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077990174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405113341","doi":"10.1080/23299460.2024.2408814","title":"Design-based methods for exploring ethical questions in the field of neurotechnologies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","topic":"Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre; University of Ottawa","funders":"Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung; Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; International Max Planck Research School for Environmental, Cellular and Molecular Microbiology","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Engineering ethics; Responsible Research and Innovation; Sociology; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.32101462892737526,"score_gpt":0.5065300734313768,"score_spread":0.18551544450400154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405113341","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008956674,0.0003763993,0.957766,0.00151516,0.0001545052,0.013009953,0.00031332194,0.00024696896,0.01766105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031649318,0.0002224599,0.94158554,0.00034003414,0.00002619128,0.024430437,0.00013477352,0.0000733141,0.0015378378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8488535,0.13458744,0.0043454557,0.0045261476,0.006485985,0.0012014721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.72962373,0.23979251,0.0067248363,0.014418476,0.008256939,0.0011835615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.112035684,0.0027671196,0.001319705,0.0074347495,0.004458354,0.009556732,0.0044196136,0.0041449405,0.016980486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13392922,0.0016017029,0.002318586,0.0034399831,0.01310326,0.006467573,0.00888592,0.0048723994,0.0023652024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042058597,0.0013510874,0.004420589,0.006850707,0.00024897515,0.0007557524,0.10451015,0.010156069,0.006980304,0.634516,0.006742487,0.2230473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013328278,0.0015533271,0.0033851864,0.004772399,0.0002545215,0.0008948649,0.05931097,0.03266555,0.009087247,0.6610635,0.22540112,0.00027856661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012166046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003008764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.112035684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006757681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00810431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59250844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406926229","doi":"10.1080/23299460.2024.2445322","title":"The challenges of being an in-house AI ethicist and how to overcome them","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.07400330639807572,"score_gpt":0.4050955723567857,"score_spread":0.33109226595871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406926229","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052937523,0.012042143,0.044540673,0.80962336,0.005840363,0.00017996928,0.00004436898,0.00029979023,0.07449185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84719604,0.008762175,0.050767817,0.065631606,0.0025300316,0.00081903674,0.00007403573,0.00033181175,0.02388752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9058304,0.061766926,0.0032954093,0.0062584686,0.01225379,0.010594997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8831006,0.060418803,0.008951973,0.008489326,0.015179638,0.023859728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07454587,0.001341951,0.0017153943,0.0019989337,0.029763365,0.034747884,0.005825298,0.020870024,0.008680687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10011557,0.001594139,0.001130486,0.0018273471,0.075094655,0.040576737,0.035294127,0.025522524,0.0034444504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088609566,0.00040312082,0.008651616,0.0012507881,0.00011698739,0.0028474443,0.2988591,0.0011391336,0.0012459189,0.4747817,0.084654786,0.12596086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004042061,0.00012658894,0.0027802973,0.0023486326,0.000025563051,0.0017500215,0.40558046,0.0013764072,0.0005414385,0.32648167,0.25877145,0.00017700094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050362186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007818711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07454587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008254338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029947432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39424092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414535245","doi":"10.1080/23299460.2025.2549956","title":"Critiquing the direction for innovation: the interplay of why, how, and what","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Politics; Grassroots; State (computer science); Discourse ethics; Relation (database); Civil society; Resistance (ecology); Business ethics","score_opus":0.01978906658711067,"score_gpt":0.295707063148235,"score_spread":0.27591799656112437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414535245","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009773328,0.04094997,0.004449216,0.27278307,0.6636649,0.00004981472,0.000051847896,0.00010223159,0.016971568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024024634,0.044476114,0.0029871287,0.062255353,0.84465224,0.00012845745,0.000074878,0.00032447462,0.021076744],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851902,0.0056347963,0.0010648945,0.0019114031,0.0053251274,0.0008735349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9424078,0.04463232,0.0022140457,0.0014169526,0.0072463234,0.0020826505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010040375,0.0012082527,0.0017532988,0.0033116166,0.0057546236,0.024336858,0.0029316943,0.011614861,0.0070324503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04544322,0.00069851027,0.0015453515,0.0019160112,0.01680691,0.01199616,0.0046945876,0.015963443,0.0025967169],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003834511,0.000032490854,0.00026138488,0.0010029715,0.00003199674,0.00033774963,0.0055703055,0.00028896998,0.00042666183,0.12127632,0.8238399,0.046892833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000097233315,0.0000346452,0.00023531653,0.0014370339,0.00001953545,0.0002055223,0.0026476344,0.00028248245,0.00024533138,0.060806233,0.93402994,0.00004656875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011137791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018365757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024336858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00434063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069605485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053099215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416203009","doi":"10.1080/23299460.2025.2582306","title":"Frankenwords or, responsible innovation for the humanities","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","topic":"Science Education and Perceptions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Responsible Research and Innovation; Neologism; Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Perspective (graphical); Duty; Mythology; Harm","score_opus":0.1571054496659279,"score_gpt":0.4623795938706288,"score_spread":0.3052741442047009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416203009","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011677271,0.036859024,0.023544556,0.36657655,0.009917036,0.00006357392,0.00017134407,0.00022539255,0.5509652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6258683,0.01186784,0.014681779,0.055575795,0.0036125653,0.00021296217,0.00010217958,0.00030863832,0.28776994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99701107,0.0015340135,0.00011720198,0.0004775408,0.0005760632,0.0002841024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751955,0.0014294189,0.00024257609,0.0003505784,0.00028858095,0.00016920076],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003090416,0.00064045674,0.0002812044,0.0011186006,0.005078878,0.008390949,0.00079839735,0.0057915724,0.0089906445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007996709,0.00021003485,0.00029601497,0.00070542813,0.01943798,0.013030398,0.0036134508,0.004993333,0.0017283198],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008080342,0.000004268254,0.000035678127,0.000028850764,0.0000016913107,0.000039344126,0.0034353656,0.00003985455,0.000063190986,0.970169,0.019611102,0.0065635764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048095553,0.000014242741,0.000095862066,0.00017465181,0.0000030193735,0.0001468909,0.0023320834,0.00012478635,0.00037519578,0.39748827,0.59922975,0.000010430681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002246232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026898612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99492115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040130503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030552782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030076683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}