{"meta":{"query_hash":"ed6a2ec13713","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty"},"cohort_total":18,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":18,"exported":18,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ed6a2ec13713","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Risk+and+Uncertainty"},"results":[{"id":"W1488103917","doi":"10.1023/a:1011132102314","title":"Ranked-Weighted Utilities and Qualitative Convolution","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.10997674900266957,"score_gpt":0.4204663498269124,"score_spread":0.3104896008242428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488103917","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029628804,0.00032978048,0.9643498,0.00061975943,0.00004676441,0.00005107857,0.00016968645,0.00009380498,0.00471058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72987235,0.00073142577,0.26181695,0.00024374592,0.0001233782,0.0002973558,0.00028144033,0.00009351701,0.006539884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939926,0.0040241536,0.0003083572,0.00041820234,0.0009046189,0.00035210527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752244,0.019670365,0.0012102083,0.0016792652,0.0016549374,0.0005608644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010169063,0.00080063345,0.001235292,0.0023032003,0.00068610243,0.0037984934,0.0017485315,0.001255317,0.005444018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04180975,0.0006469921,0.0014836709,0.0023006783,0.002387885,0.008612534,0.0019426644,0.0012993799,0.0004341649],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056525107,0.00003109484,0.00046662535,0.000081318416,0.000036088677,0.000052513726,0.00014344692,0.039935578,0.00024205387,0.93745583,0.00064444274,0.020854533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007471841,0.000015267373,0.00010532389,0.00001725433,0.000011171958,0.000037794463,0.000033405322,0.11078218,0.0001570501,0.8884231,0.0003968248,0.000013188061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002148718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015768958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010169063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002450981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013842975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05377978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491755126","doi":"10.1023/a:1011149422763","title":"Lottery Decisions and Probability Weighting Function","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Argument (complex analysis); Mathematical economics; Function (biology); Weighting; Preference; Economics; Econometrics; Computer science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.08839251925516983,"score_gpt":0.3476835833279564,"score_spread":0.25929106407278657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491755126","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19943023,0.0013830018,0.7718954,0.0033157526,0.00021383479,0.00027471388,0.00025514493,0.00018182363,0.023050092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88516307,0.0010950799,0.09963025,0.00041333976,0.00020951116,0.00043801736,0.00020732617,0.00007580975,0.012767538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99366564,0.004626682,0.00027058116,0.00046920538,0.0005673797,0.00040046702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9406396,0.05329736,0.0017157539,0.0020633796,0.0013681701,0.00091572653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0140165575,0.0009561227,0.0021653664,0.002131083,0.00077858,0.0036395213,0.0016720616,0.002801401,0.011467192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063652016,0.00091449823,0.0013364296,0.0016720553,0.0024576483,0.007863002,0.0014068144,0.002181179,0.00079950434],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035882666,0.00023153498,0.0016652754,0.00015603594,0.00014646955,0.000112022804,0.000288148,0.039643623,0.00045312336,0.9171586,0.002074917,0.037711386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054017903,0.00007318644,0.00069079245,0.00002649619,0.00004666312,0.000109952336,0.000073197894,0.11630773,0.0001239411,0.88169503,0.0007659381,0.000033141438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090012414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007435803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0140165575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014685686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009584717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074127495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526201865","doi":"10.1007/s11166-017-9264-0","title":"Learning-by-doing in an ambiguous environment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ambiguity; Ambiguity aversion; Expected utility hypothesis; Session (web analytics); Measure (data warehouse); Economics; Microeconomics; Psychology; Actuarial science; Social psychology; Computer science; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.05447298923000997,"score_gpt":0.36696709040145403,"score_spread":0.31249410117144405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526201865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8678303,0.0003673217,0.10251272,0.0037185312,0.00009637404,0.00006659979,0.00008906921,0.00007154381,0.025247542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943558,0.0001344505,0.0041591837,0.00004998027,0.00002779588,0.000013141996,0.000011001785,0.000005796223,0.0012428806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982863,0.0010281394,0.00007131586,0.00022967753,0.00014611839,0.00023844972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9751881,0.020541627,0.001713132,0.0009102394,0.00040099586,0.0012460342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035557095,0.00045925291,0.0008263541,0.00043247335,0.00070794043,0.0022234535,0.0007665166,0.0024561335,0.0036994729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016571103,0.00034463924,0.00045669187,0.00039596908,0.0025831896,0.0030076297,0.001346842,0.0014253394,0.0002600768],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012694983,0.0012129984,0.015353666,0.0002946619,0.00029563185,0.0014899594,0.0015871437,0.35929555,0.0034166733,0.54924953,0.0024528306,0.064081855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013506997,0.00028282427,0.003129494,0.000029309573,0.000055316792,0.00014443113,0.0005948565,0.30133274,0.0005716063,0.6927716,0.00090446556,0.000048272654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018027049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017224343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036994729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006734472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000928193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01880467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1810802980","doi":"10.1007/s11166-015-9216-5","title":"Probabilistic sophistication and reverse Bayesianism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Sophistication; Mathematical economics; Probabilistic logic; Subjective expected utility; Expected utility hypothesis; Representation (politics); Decision theory; Computer science; Mathematics; Economics; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.11563006113090726,"score_gpt":0.37266609677122825,"score_spread":0.25703603564032096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1810802980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48991644,0.001449493,0.38436645,0.01587786,0.00013207081,0.00008750795,0.00022457166,0.0001444286,0.10780114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798456,0.00044259688,0.016732793,0.00032868114,0.00012435134,0.000034581375,0.00004089491,0.000019520206,0.0024310339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953774,0.0022842884,0.00036515514,0.0006296226,0.000996469,0.00034702424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9046096,0.07339816,0.007832936,0.0087715015,0.0040894747,0.001298368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01027071,0.00045173266,0.0009849919,0.001398836,0.0007639312,0.004476973,0.0011701767,0.002378736,0.006301115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07259145,0.00088243856,0.0012529274,0.0010011666,0.0055375774,0.010470662,0.0027141953,0.0035272343,0.00047191692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000761378,0.00003656286,0.002142378,0.000063650405,0.000054625732,0.00008335596,0.00035768255,0.0066346256,0.00022969578,0.9798663,0.00043933844,0.0100155445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011010837,0.000008105529,0.0005898214,0.0000068852955,0.000014795605,0.00006487396,0.00003058779,0.0074514747,0.00006543455,0.99130356,0.0004443457,0.0000090621925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009715807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007465542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01027071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010115702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006724432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054317355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985070728","doi":"10.1007/s11166-010-9106-9","title":"Demand for health risk reductions: A cross-national comparison between the U.S. and Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Health Canada; University of Oregon; University of Alberta; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Willingness to pay; Preference; Marital status; Marginal utility; Demography; Economics; Perception; Demographic economics; Time preference; Revealed preference; Psychology; Socioeconomics; Econometrics; Sociology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.05145814475945512,"score_gpt":0.27857793584090706,"score_spread":0.22711979108145194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985070728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98708063,0.00056148815,0.00014668249,0.0006964867,0.000008995011,0.000026449407,0.0056586205,0.000010046667,0.005810605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953146,0.00046357364,0.00018620315,0.00015203096,0.0000031090808,0.000011619941,0.0028105073,0.000005608511,0.0010527066],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992766,0.000052670217,0.000033863922,0.00009534507,0.00031955534,0.00022193819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972144,0.00041142895,0.00032675482,0.00007517998,0.0014313527,0.0005408005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007888321,0.0002497487,0.00045828996,0.0012498165,0.0018239261,0.0014895458,0.00079759024,0.00042680796,0.0032836322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034373396,0.00021156942,0.0007891614,0.004815318,0.0005826087,0.0004431082,0.00069011224,0.00056561927,0.00025646304],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038712975,0.00011956703,0.95859015,0.00012440144,0.00032153557,0.00024256732,0.0033579997,0.0025114676,0.0004490908,0.0020178552,0.007199229,0.02467897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021606276,0.00003076643,0.9908529,0.00003894404,0.00004618707,0.0000568231,0.0034565972,0.001939752,0.00010017975,0.0001161885,0.0033051474,0.000034845616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9962592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99748355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027937159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027937159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018817874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20269924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992351052","doi":"10.1007/s11166-007-9023-8","title":"Predicted risk perception and risk-taking behavior: The case of impaired driving","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Risk perception; Perception; License; Psychology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0157210387467877,"score_gpt":0.31287069021295744,"score_spread":0.29714965146616973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992351052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99947935,0.00001745995,0.00008967548,0.000110170986,0.000001884984,0.0000025737515,0.000022868695,0.0000014439173,0.00027456926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998319,0.000014692474,0.000044415905,0.0000046484056,0.0000019021718,0.00000108531,0.000026834197,6.5390526e-7,0.000073748],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932873,0.00028687643,0.000035116216,0.0000728973,0.00007591246,0.00020047533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98707426,0.008225209,0.0012922639,0.0010591531,0.0010363352,0.0013128557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001959315,0.0003416852,0.0005439449,0.00087350287,0.00084787357,0.002279928,0.0010452673,0.0018992769,0.003985941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018016208,0.00035149543,0.00077758305,0.00066173024,0.000826681,0.0010424515,0.00085768243,0.0017808997,0.00034610313],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007950496,0.0010749996,0.98261017,0.000014965683,0.00012689678,0.0013103553,0.0012966056,0.007820804,0.00031949225,0.0009883367,0.00024593063,0.0033963243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006859124,0.0008358125,0.8096729,0.000023257187,0.0002427287,0.001851848,0.0064595635,0.17593549,0.00051158934,0.003848609,0.00047090283,0.00007873975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04653949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022130625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04653949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009415936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008272637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092537165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996299332","doi":"10.1023/b:risk.0000009434.18807.bd","title":"A Simple Risk-Sharing Experiment","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission; York University","keywords":"Ex-ante; Exploit; Simple (philosophy); Economics; Test (biology); Microeconomics; Computer science; Actuarial science; Computer security; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.02799752562350948,"score_gpt":0.3309313850388068,"score_spread":0.3029338594152973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996299332","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97380877,0.0001186848,0.010067555,0.0015463732,0.0003310578,0.0006830751,0.00056226813,0.00015626165,0.012725932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9830362,0.00011479984,0.009176497,0.0008680828,0.00013420002,0.0007376343,0.00018177135,0.00003029788,0.0057204748],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890673,0.00046453468,0.00009211543,0.00020976663,0.00021826093,0.00010856966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862705,0.009262741,0.0007742151,0.0026689593,0.00034946314,0.00067424995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034561814,0.0005458247,0.0010309013,0.000226312,0.00061091804,0.0009031426,0.00113706,0.0025629897,0.0137717705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014161091,0.0003520917,0.0005025175,0.00022642702,0.0013163151,0.0015434192,0.0009060744,0.0011749722,0.0009315995],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.13868129,0.074464135,0.013132307,0.0031190503,0.0017600338,0.0013432062,0.0020491246,0.029906128,0.3826884,0.22321491,0.016329277,0.11331212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.08025618,0.09849404,0.040762037,0.00027095733,0.0018495095,0.0016738097,0.00075111905,0.092384815,0.08733133,0.5690533,0.026413143,0.00075979694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004920398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003033691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0137717705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003677422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007522907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04607117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998069918","doi":"10.1007/s11166-009-9077-x","title":"Dirty money: Is there a wage premium for working in a pollution intensive industry?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compensating differential; Wage; Economics; Value (mathematics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Labour economics; Differential (mechanical device); Work (physics); Risk premium; Efficiency wage; Wage share; Monetary economics","score_opus":0.05861902698601548,"score_gpt":0.23330259679490603,"score_spread":0.17468356980889055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998069918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99234056,0.00053001795,0.0003761113,0.0047807368,0.000056911667,0.000006163952,0.00006331239,0.000004693999,0.0018415174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99901843,0.00014104156,0.000039275983,0.00014327618,0.00010443744,0.0000018883169,0.00003361943,0.0000016937744,0.000516426],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996014,0.00010043656,0.000024994582,0.00005089285,0.00006585258,0.0001563093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826011,0.0087556895,0.0044244546,0.0003872937,0.00035472648,0.0034767939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001145365,0.00023649338,0.00061955664,0.000713234,0.00061165617,0.0018161453,0.00085477676,0.0027089126,0.009804232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014217941,0.00023432677,0.0004223792,0.00050244346,0.0014633916,0.0017003785,0.0008245737,0.0024737995,0.00040461222],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031924262,0.002266573,0.9159392,0.00020767214,0.00027917104,0.00253511,0.0020235074,0.0023584617,0.0024176247,0.013129584,0.00376062,0.051890098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000232083,0.0005757947,0.9291811,0.00011248269,0.00026366804,0.0008988353,0.008903568,0.007099342,0.0005430908,0.050629493,0.0014956872,0.00006484328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040666987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003958168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009804232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040931843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042627694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03279841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028255406","doi":"10.1007/s11166-013-9171-y","title":"Does insurance fraud in automobile theft insurance fluctuate with the business cycle?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Insurance and Financial Risk Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Automobile insurance; Insurance fraud; Business; Actuarial science; Business cycle; Property insurance; Casualty insurance; Insurance policy; Economics","score_opus":0.005628133296612484,"score_gpt":0.18236821871689113,"score_spread":0.17674008542027864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028255406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99195427,0.0009688212,0.00090441183,0.0034233432,0.000037201116,0.00001819148,0.0004969189,0.000017743234,0.0021790185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99919313,0.0001642996,0.000044622368,0.00009058139,0.000029290086,0.0000029812954,0.00012842745,0.000004427741,0.00034217266],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988438,0.00029315453,0.00010451352,0.00025746846,0.00015092707,0.00035001687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95593077,0.021000711,0.018020004,0.0014624441,0.00202945,0.001556673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036754257,0.00022740605,0.0007738659,0.0011858868,0.0004877634,0.0034767252,0.000922981,0.0040118457,0.0046331473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046177827,0.0005432726,0.00082228915,0.0019148653,0.0014356176,0.0031826848,0.0010964115,0.0025749821,0.0008883072],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005838806,0.00028729756,0.97075695,0.00005198049,0.00024920623,0.00042307365,0.0004350103,0.0076905023,0.00041919414,0.0056419666,0.0020742496,0.011386748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045460572,0.00019516404,0.928286,0.000051998373,0.00020326195,0.00043559299,0.0016764523,0.05132868,0.00046374163,0.015124499,0.002119101,0.000069955175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011734332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010106923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011734332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012830695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063969725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02333206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054922874","doi":"10.1007/s11166-014-9186-z","title":"Take-up for genetic tests and ambiguity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Pennsylvania State University","keywords":"Ambiguity; Ambiguity aversion; Affect (linguistics); Economics; Test (biology); Value (mathematics); Expected utility hypothesis; Decision maker; Private information retrieval; Subjective expected utility; Ex-ante; Value of information; Outcome (game theory); Econometrics; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Psychology; Mathematics; Statistics; Biology; Machine learning","score_opus":0.07214745918230582,"score_gpt":0.3764352568517761,"score_spread":0.3042877976694703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054922874","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7236962,0.0027473788,0.18677874,0.031671993,0.0007955326,0.00011945529,0.00058054336,0.0003316379,0.053278532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847265,0.00019998958,0.012402108,0.0006665772,0.00020301713,0.000024385216,0.000056517016,0.000032361222,0.0016886733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98910964,0.005461923,0.00049529626,0.0019088407,0.002099977,0.00092426274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86392623,0.110977896,0.00685729,0.011951955,0.0029667271,0.0033199084],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01847732,0.001125251,0.0026207666,0.0025262644,0.0015384767,0.0053916564,0.0022246672,0.0051919906,0.010728086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17007649,0.00079716585,0.0013858911,0.0015279026,0.008098754,0.010480919,0.004375711,0.004836671,0.00045024883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006508051,0.00020996598,0.039264068,0.00019209618,0.0004905741,0.003621863,0.0015634141,0.008853958,0.0016079048,0.87322,0.0028556501,0.06746965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000447122,0.0000502591,0.0033365737,0.00003006895,0.00005651618,0.00052294723,0.00024200017,0.011438456,0.00045990798,0.98298454,0.0008051129,0.00002885543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011412269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009641016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9815227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001260709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014398764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0977186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063996785","doi":"10.1007/s11166-005-5832-9","title":"Ranked Additive Utility Representations of Gambles: Old and New Axiomatizations","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Sports Analytics and Performance","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Von Neumann–Morgenstern utility theorem; Economics; Econometrics; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.027590469799145215,"score_gpt":0.25096454788716327,"score_spread":0.22337407808801807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063996785","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022851685,0.00082835637,0.9563616,0.002171774,0.00014567145,0.000058953552,0.0005806536,0.00018337158,0.016817937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6180757,0.0023473795,0.36546317,0.0011480188,0.0008409159,0.0005164543,0.00144312,0.0002158053,0.009949416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99451256,0.0026708061,0.0005230399,0.0007369604,0.0011562391,0.00040029152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98934644,0.006303514,0.000726227,0.0017030853,0.0015019258,0.00041879836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063567962,0.001140166,0.0012141238,0.0021115758,0.0010536069,0.0065487544,0.0028286022,0.0020499523,0.0077282507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016136732,0.00079940684,0.0024127765,0.0027800668,0.0036073907,0.012791633,0.0028573587,0.0059177247,0.0011638618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010126469,0.00001846181,0.00011535936,0.000021027625,0.00001118298,0.000014072906,0.00008695334,0.0020286702,0.00006559915,0.9900277,0.0006269537,0.0069739097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006983651,0.00000933018,0.0000800022,0.000013497694,0.000009218676,0.000021759788,0.000024193469,0.01414775,0.000044405966,0.98449844,0.0011345773,0.000009946579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017822948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015442527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077282507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018599231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011339092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03361833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118335134","doi":"10.1007/s10797-006-6665-4","title":"Estimates of Own Lethal Risks and Anchoring Effects","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Anchoring; Cohort; Population; Psychology; Cohort effect; Actuarial science; Demography; Social psychology; Economics; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.06492304748172943,"score_gpt":0.3714043440293516,"score_spread":0.30648129654762213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118335134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76412237,0.0010762145,0.21174191,0.0003431582,0.000061342755,0.00003092053,0.00041758906,0.00021470085,0.021991909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870884,0.0002090094,0.011308849,0.000022939754,0.000015380298,0.000010230841,0.00013527815,0.000029611092,0.0011802295],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986285,0.00056076795,0.00007085348,0.00027215623,0.00037586867,0.00009194892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9649827,0.027166478,0.0021380172,0.0041196225,0.0012855947,0.00030752012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005334062,0.00060181244,0.000664561,0.0015796248,0.0002817328,0.0023662555,0.0007209253,0.0009313697,0.0041457377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041089367,0.00039180025,0.0007367739,0.0007315051,0.0011222584,0.0034330476,0.0017409174,0.0011645567,0.00049811526],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017260285,0.0002471025,0.13948478,0.00034950246,0.0012336277,0.00044254353,0.0014542902,0.41859046,0.01889679,0.21596764,0.0019305925,0.1996766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009951409,0.0007459675,0.15713616,0.00016746233,0.00085687294,0.0009427427,0.00088157074,0.4524786,0.03668255,0.34565234,0.0040473286,0.00030894118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007996038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007667014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005334062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005174288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028035688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028209567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154333424","doi":"10.1023/a:1015683401986","title":"Replacement Cost Endorsement and Opportunistic Fraud in Automobile Insurance","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Automobile insurance; Business; Insurance fraud; Actuarial science; Internet privacy; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.03433640269979697,"score_gpt":0.23479112338403327,"score_spread":0.2004547206842363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154333424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9326406,0.002922268,0.029914336,0.015578758,0.000093319024,0.00010072464,0.0002620501,0.000066440705,0.018421521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979431,0.00034811618,0.0005131998,0.00010576274,0.00008710308,0.000006602995,0.000018102208,0.0000026176228,0.0009753566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946219,0.002548486,0.00041602112,0.0005176168,0.0007355149,0.0011604741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86982375,0.099901095,0.021432644,0.0035241148,0.003594396,0.0017240717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009801446,0.00031564359,0.0013010504,0.0016398645,0.0015909274,0.004862198,0.0012501219,0.0072560287,0.006186387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07947199,0.0007070761,0.00078126707,0.0017991157,0.0051914193,0.0051916237,0.0017686574,0.0036204706,0.00026820166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010155971,0.0005869997,0.13622142,0.00019508225,0.00022542376,0.0031804738,0.0022971088,0.04160858,0.0008811014,0.76976436,0.00935778,0.034665972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023524523,0.00020047826,0.035926897,0.000080647515,0.00028509094,0.0018618644,0.0020664015,0.1814345,0.0006661827,0.773876,0.003243384,0.0001232936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0079573635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006682401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009801446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019497854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051835656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264690108","doi":"10.1007/s11166-018-9294-2","title":"Dinner with Bayes: On the revision of risk beliefs","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Psychology; Quarter (Canadian coin); Bayes' theorem; Population; Social psychology; Risk perception; Actuarial science; Bayesian probability; Medicine; Environmental health; Economics; Computer science; Geography; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.015073507704125527,"score_gpt":0.2872395212732116,"score_spread":0.2721660135690861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264690108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9575855,0.0011305985,0.022982733,0.0043932945,0.00015039694,0.00007843278,0.00007580406,0.00007166444,0.013531448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904952,0.00031834128,0.006897613,0.0007200409,0.000055716675,0.000031142616,0.000054439184,0.000014777746,0.0014126141],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99518037,0.0036864397,0.000120326345,0.0003610064,0.0004921693,0.0001596938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9475043,0.041731533,0.0048922687,0.0029871461,0.002010937,0.0008737899],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010150682,0.00041307192,0.0004154769,0.0005193744,0.0007613759,0.0021500222,0.0006746941,0.0016072991,0.0054744566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.074215285,0.0003945649,0.00046991959,0.0003360499,0.0019718863,0.0036252749,0.0011763547,0.0021896889,0.0005473739],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0052704937,0.0018012234,0.2951602,0.00086410047,0.0007782539,0.0013759627,0.093198046,0.013806719,0.0117653,0.070126966,0.007111534,0.49874112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010029972,0.00520139,0.3310474,0.0011461722,0.00094224303,0.0020218682,0.050073564,0.12995622,0.014051328,0.42522976,0.03860762,0.0007193477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002436231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018215766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010150682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052032754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046836672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053682625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775632528","doi":"10.1007/s11166-017-9267-x","title":"Baseline risk and marginal willingness to pay for health risk reduction","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Universiteit van Tilburg; Royal Society; Universiteit van Amsterdam; University of Central Florida; Yale University; University of Alberta; European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Baseline (sea); Willingness to pay; Actuarial science; Economics; Preference; Marginal value; Marginal utility; Contingent valuation; Heart disease; Econometric model; Medicine; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.05143877736211261,"score_gpt":0.26383605666761606,"score_spread":0.21239727930550345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775632528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9800465,0.00033993513,0.011665802,0.0005278679,0.0000126727855,0.000038929975,0.00037770803,0.000032355747,0.0069582667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998808,0.00003180227,0.00056003494,0.000020649477,0.000004827531,0.000011390366,0.00010876805,0.0000024040191,0.00045205955],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985935,0.00079019536,0.00007733608,0.00014897213,0.00017711455,0.00021275751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977795,0.017256513,0.0022086566,0.0011793545,0.0007023833,0.0008580818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029317623,0.00022597433,0.000451253,0.00042235726,0.00012741257,0.0014552757,0.0005695134,0.00079168356,0.008866304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022979725,0.00017985712,0.0007164952,0.00032131645,0.00046749265,0.00118113,0.0005254273,0.0010724805,0.00048212768],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002925689,0.0015591604,0.7364234,0.000332576,0.0010356792,0.001121364,0.0025393448,0.071683116,0.004465302,0.071951546,0.001993917,0.10396892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012254548,0.0014546411,0.79525965,0.00011609311,0.00024136997,0.0015197442,0.0026530745,0.09684788,0.0012885594,0.09704917,0.0033213596,0.00012588625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007517575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049351464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008866304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055726466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022569355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029660761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899743006","doi":"10.1007/s11166-018-9291-5","title":"Reporting probabilistic expectations with dynamic uncertainty about possible distributions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Econometrics; Probability distribution; Counterfactual thinking; Bayes' theorem; Prior probability; Set (abstract data type); Probabilistic logic; Bayesian probability; Statistics; Distribution (mathematics); Mathematics; Joint probability distribution; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.05329607838990369,"score_gpt":0.3793879351215523,"score_spread":0.3260918567316486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899743006","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2868481,0.0007190083,0.6937061,0.0065984637,0.00031511646,0.00012873411,0.0008236921,0.0006434307,0.010217308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97365,0.0002830961,0.024617089,0.00024063364,0.00017171646,0.000067969115,0.00027256834,0.000038902872,0.0006581017],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.989423,0.0053540436,0.0010936533,0.0012993035,0.002256454,0.0005736378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8247897,0.14839621,0.013574238,0.007926003,0.004175491,0.001138335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0139723215,0.00085513724,0.0012040541,0.00113994,0.00046658714,0.0049937717,0.0016658431,0.0029041504,0.003778539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1938216,0.0010785342,0.001035727,0.0016289062,0.0014675641,0.00882216,0.002171338,0.0026752492,0.00051593356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022955225,0.00042857954,0.04067232,0.0005465359,0.0007554,0.0018176283,0.0020683408,0.48898163,0.0035841279,0.28231162,0.00802513,0.1685132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007797272,0.00015036875,0.0034603337,0.00007155056,0.000110527835,0.0004088234,0.00022726796,0.68792456,0.001718529,0.3049216,0.0008469919,0.00008141694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002083966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089565874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0139723215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014070676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011901167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07389361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192529810","doi":"10.1007/s11166-006-9519-7","title":"Lottery qualities","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Certainty; Mathematical economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Prospect theory; Point (geometry); Test (biology); Decision theory; Key (lock); Economics; Computer science; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04168384935939519,"score_gpt":0.3524790080602633,"score_spread":0.3107951587008681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3192529810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.107101336,0.0007265354,0.058950957,0.0026372836,0.00038341573,0.00037227446,0.00094085786,0.00045511665,0.82843214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82812786,0.00036691842,0.01357344,0.00047658253,0.00013777411,0.00020322371,0.00049297325,0.00017468045,0.15644658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990404,0.00027133117,0.00006429542,0.000113611444,0.00037863984,0.00013171142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972609,0.0008952214,0.0002397141,0.000603157,0.0005906577,0.00041044859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001530565,0.00037542838,0.00044647875,0.0012788696,0.0011352494,0.0032557037,0.00050648476,0.00081364106,0.13053906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009702683,0.00025113963,0.00043484083,0.0006556001,0.001147477,0.0026730404,0.0012577394,0.0016291427,0.009750758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004792956,0.00024639504,0.0032238218,0.00012258755,0.000037493388,0.00013562685,0.0005565178,0.000998792,0.0015693877,0.85567516,0.017392019,0.11956284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001715335,0.00039209065,0.010481854,0.00011032152,0.000045133685,0.0007621966,0.00070853805,0.004965212,0.0015634779,0.89591616,0.0848332,0.00005028481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040797194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054418214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13053906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067557016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005715567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43669665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378416836","doi":"10.1007/s11166-023-09412-4","title":"Advantageous selection without moral hazard","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Swenson College of Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota Duluth; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Fondation du Risque; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Moral hazard; Context (archaeology); Actuarial science; Selection (genetic algorithm); Product (mathematics); Risk aversion (psychology); Morale hazard; Face (sociological concept); Economics; Hazard; Property (philosophy); Microeconomics; Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Risk pool; Insurance policy; Computer science; Expected utility hypothesis; Key person insurance; Incentive; Financial economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.011985967540218549,"score_gpt":0.24025383068826067,"score_spread":0.22826786314804212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378416836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8680933,0.00023754142,0.06661125,0.0018629525,0.00022582037,0.000070924034,0.00035911423,0.00028902543,0.06225007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861103,0.000058147827,0.004537926,0.0003181961,0.00006309637,0.000023841529,0.000061120285,0.00003923365,0.008788048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908185,0.00031469308,0.000028980257,0.00018572224,0.00016667669,0.0002222039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99513394,0.0017441979,0.00045027726,0.0014872124,0.0003519966,0.00083237735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016440896,0.0002886323,0.0007357243,0.0006805067,0.0006558207,0.0010876169,0.00053180434,0.0009481438,0.017111747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007616191,0.00026656454,0.00037466612,0.0003336345,0.000976703,0.00086271664,0.0013354205,0.0011396218,0.0012937414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006991238,0.00044570054,0.04402027,0.00018423122,0.00027138158,0.002308732,0.00053389993,0.007978528,0.05131317,0.7622861,0.012798411,0.117160395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032266194,0.0005743849,0.04411973,0.00003410325,0.00017959664,0.0048716506,0.00049558154,0.058113724,0.0057067885,0.87201905,0.013484426,0.00007827036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018597415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004027775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017111747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002552774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053747126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05724448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}