{"meta":{"query_hash":"ed6a2ec13713","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty"},"cohort_total":18,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":18,"exported":18,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ed6a2ec13713","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Risk+and+Uncertainty"},"results":[{"id":"W1488103917","doi":"10.1023/a:1011132102314","title":"Ranked-Weighted Utilities and Qualitative Convolution","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.10997674900266957,"score_gpt":0.4204663498269124,"score_spread":0.3104896008242428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488103917","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952695,0.0015052801,0.001999767,0.00036153785,0.0003499893,0.000041298925,0.000022997223,0.0000057044867,0.0004439275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971195,0.0016243252,0.0008756726,0.00006430666,0.00010179586,4.2278066e-7,5.62521e-7,0.000004300903,0.00020911974],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980659,0.00035909525,0.0007846686,0.00018530844,0.0004587878,0.0001462459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99590933,0.0026162658,0.00069016515,0.00014674262,0.0004886781,0.00014883425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043303403,0.000110698646,0.00037684952,0.00025047956,0.00018877785,0.00020699682,0.00018283406,0.00007274873,0.00012786506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018011829,0.00006860326,0.000104673774,0.00020349034,0.00023023813,0.0004004335,0.000047676716,0.00021613111,0.0000115346165],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064650754,0.000064059685,0.02966338,0.0000017259642,0.00003153202,0.000033742715,0.013506872,0.000100352634,0.00003255211,0.001186904,0.002992084,0.95174026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00202938,0.00051394565,0.046752073,0.00006792225,0.00008890435,0.00044164216,0.065210484,0.004452981,0.000024762416,0.80781937,0.07235161,0.00024692016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013940463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008306941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9514934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036819478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057221754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27975598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491755126","doi":"10.1023/a:1011149422763","title":"Lottery Decisions and Probability Weighting Function","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Argument (complex analysis); Mathematical economics; Function (biology); Weighting; Preference; Economics; Econometrics; Computer science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.08839251925516983,"score_gpt":0.3476835833279564,"score_spread":0.25929106407278657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491755126","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914906,0.00050583,0.00669592,0.00038234662,0.00056103565,0.00005526489,0.000007083172,0.0000075031994,0.00029443568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966395,0.0008315846,0.002160573,0.00009947257,0.00019362556,5.503579e-7,3.1066787e-7,0.0000056807758,0.00006872614],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787474,0.00017893975,0.00096082635,0.0002741374,0.0005399639,0.00017140094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955172,0.0028199262,0.00076069694,0.00025559004,0.00044063822,0.00020596132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004726859,0.0001239352,0.00036356124,0.000262039,0.00028275125,0.00032957373,0.00023276662,0.00008580308,0.00011530239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048850947,0.000075045835,0.00013350094,0.00029056365,0.000118684715,0.0004716857,0.000098832505,0.00030064103,0.0000149648595],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021647091,0.00004690023,0.15303893,4.674691e-7,0.000006741807,0.000015328857,0.00017158948,0.0004238634,0.00003134847,0.00009507593,0.00092837657,0.8450249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000858822,0.00038404725,0.26294786,0.000066418404,0.00007765616,0.0005325566,0.0011367032,0.0024411208,0.000009013614,0.66709024,0.06427966,0.00017587586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000041346113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009427116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84484905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042405143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060642193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5848267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526201865","doi":"10.1007/s11166-017-9264-0","title":"Learning-by-doing in an ambiguous environment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ambiguity; Ambiguity aversion; Expected utility hypothesis; Session (web analytics); Measure (data warehouse); Economics; Microeconomics; Psychology; Actuarial science; Social psychology; Computer science; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.05447298923000997,"score_gpt":0.36696709040145403,"score_spread":0.31249410117144405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526201865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99856526,0.00023549795,0.0005091819,0.00017415517,0.0002590998,0.000028445453,0.0000060711573,0.0000025018394,0.0002198135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99841875,0.00069374597,0.00063543936,0.000026915975,0.0000832398,3.4789014e-7,3.4895888e-7,0.0000060491257,0.00013518726],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998316,0.00016428529,0.00066732336,0.00021668973,0.0004726512,0.00016304174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979427,0.00025960247,0.0011922886,0.00036989732,0.00007500661,0.00016049453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036021098,0.00010208721,0.00032808012,0.00016135233,0.00038274185,0.0006493182,0.00063382083,0.0000692341,0.000101299156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013471472,0.00006863637,0.00009276199,0.000036526577,0.000118512566,0.0005832857,0.000112465255,0.0004019983,0.000024083904],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067933775,0.000056114313,0.1335334,2.6307396e-7,0.0000023559646,0.00003243983,0.00045835806,0.0056044115,0.00009180916,0.0000046707873,0.0002489535,0.8598993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002721157,0.0015528175,0.77109253,0.000096774755,0.000053802203,0.00016021263,0.005723015,0.010641678,0.00012445654,0.059065677,0.14831299,0.0004548983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034605464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013972631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8594444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056816283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033541313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6261391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1810802980","doi":"10.1007/s11166-015-9216-5","title":"Probabilistic sophistication and reverse Bayesianism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Axiom; Sophistication; Mathematical economics; Probabilistic logic; Subjective expected utility; Expected utility hypothesis; Representation (politics); Decision theory; Computer science; Mathematics; Economics; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.11563006113090726,"score_gpt":0.37266609677122825,"score_spread":0.25703603564032096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1810802980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.995111,0.00038060662,0.0031018301,0.0005396907,0.00039284682,0.000048772297,0.000010452279,0.0000043083637,0.00041050668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962703,0.00017139899,0.0032657634,0.00007149257,0.0001266252,4.3183354e-7,3.3617872e-7,0.000004236849,0.000089422836],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855864,0.00012685315,0.00060590444,0.00017117066,0.00043703336,0.00010037355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976128,0.00082163024,0.0006014557,0.00018488514,0.0005271632,0.00025209202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035963305,0.00008381355,0.00026311065,0.0001556319,0.00008861188,0.0001892921,0.00019351355,0.00005805094,0.000028670243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067162956,0.000052788462,0.000055161927,0.00013487105,0.00011932176,0.00024509057,0.00005247675,0.00016589688,0.000017230677],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020323794,0.00006588555,0.015719391,0.000002145593,0.000008152884,0.000029768235,0.0011376555,0.0009788512,0.00001960548,0.0019734225,0.010641467,0.9692204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008330443,0.000304236,0.01632658,0.000030258923,0.00006866053,0.00026831232,0.0016078898,0.00508867,0.000005250458,0.9319203,0.043420497,0.0001262917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000043041196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021187818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9690941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005008597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000117742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8040518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985070728","doi":"10.1007/s11166-010-9106-9","title":"Demand for health risk reductions: A cross-national comparison between the U.S. and Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Health Canada; University of Oregon; University of Alberta; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Willingness to pay; Preference; Marital status; Marginal utility; Demography; Economics; Perception; Demographic economics; Time preference; Revealed preference; Psychology; Socioeconomics; Econometrics; Sociology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.05145814475945512,"score_gpt":0.27857793584090706,"score_spread":0.22711979108145194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985070728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946343,0.0014013618,0.0016104201,0.0014857656,0.00031640334,0.0000967774,0.00037324926,0.0000012973431,0.00008046185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973174,0.0014543328,0.000756902,0.00010847569,0.00031163963,0.0000032356265,0.0000072669836,0.000005124226,0.000035673387],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999218,0.000018650793,0.000515842,0.00010703114,0.000037349593,0.00010316477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874,0.00021791627,0.0008763941,0.00005924385,0.000028879704,0.00007754654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015576596,0.00006452392,0.00022348756,0.000042886135,0.0003354559,0.0000512173,0.000066096996,0.00003772388,0.000022229118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022011141,0.000051548843,0.00004273151,0.000023120374,0.00008442453,0.00011571635,0.000014292941,0.00023666173,0.0000010402306],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014331978,0.000012752831,0.98860353,0.0000045643055,0.000037083802,3.725488e-8,0.00021331228,0.0015061104,5.599502e-7,0.0021584097,0.0028103387,0.004638958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000572553,0.000071321745,0.9357126,0.0000034071672,0.00001224871,0.0000080765,0.00014483464,0.0023013344,0.0000030969186,0.02292186,0.03818792,0.00006078052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06672453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.070871465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052890975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010744122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009511833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9460827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992351052","doi":"10.1007/s11166-007-9023-8","title":"Predicted risk perception and risk-taking behavior: The case of impaired driving","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Risk Perception and Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Risk perception; Perception; License; Psychology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0157210387467877,"score_gpt":0.31287069021295744,"score_spread":0.29714965146616973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992351052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965672,0.00023182592,0.0021929257,0.00010162545,0.0002182812,0.00017146091,0.000014932553,0.000013467319,0.0004882889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829282,0.016219689,0.00050438,0.00001718858,0.0002674279,0.0000012138321,5.884664e-7,0.000005931153,0.000055376073],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985354,0.0004357815,0.00042817145,0.00011406679,0.00028111486,0.00020548503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776244,0.000309096,0.0014897644,0.000103250524,0.00018280522,0.00015264776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045739673,0.00009646572,0.00018762752,0.0001322664,0.0008828072,0.000071854185,0.000110019515,0.0000805366,0.00009685973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076531887,0.00006297089,0.0001022022,0.00017319378,0.00031909908,0.00019324248,0.000041409538,0.00034181785,5.456251e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065200315,0.00005589048,0.5611502,0.000004745265,0.000038533442,0.000067377005,0.038815606,0.000119435885,0.00006165528,0.00019003941,0.00028677282,0.39914453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055483636,0.00013189722,0.9118751,0.000031760614,0.00035280117,0.00010872098,0.08211577,0.0005622299,0.000002993707,0.0003990113,0.0037829974,0.000081826955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019004304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024721462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3990627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000083787556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004200281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99307483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996299332","doi":"10.1023/b:risk.0000009434.18807.bd","title":"A Simple Risk-Sharing Experiment","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission; York University","keywords":"Ex-ante; Exploit; Simple (philosophy); Economics; Test (biology); Microeconomics; Computer science; Actuarial science; Computer security; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.02799752562350948,"score_gpt":0.3309313850388068,"score_spread":0.3029338594152973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996299332","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.989744,0.0029014226,0.00004346099,0.0000684984,0.00025549027,0.00006291318,0.0000049829546,0.0000073294887,0.0069118896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948543,0.0043264646,0.0005736439,0.000035318048,0.0001120917,0.0000022002723,1.7299058e-7,0.000005706309,0.000090120426],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912834,0.00013744037,0.00027738363,0.00010772509,0.00015368569,0.00019541766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924785,0.00010120204,0.00036622482,0.00007222871,0.00007212123,0.00014038962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096995704,0.0000836581,0.000197795,0.00005137116,0.0005506519,0.000066396795,0.000112479014,0.0000416115,0.00010298337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028366345,0.000069820984,0.00008828112,0.000064713924,0.00014722646,0.00016256214,0.000032881257,0.00017095325,0.0000037650384],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090654314,0.00020501832,0.88016206,0.0000037311547,0.0001018961,0.000020328567,0.06827125,0.00034410536,0.00078555866,0.03610903,0.0014356103,0.012470736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0050805337,0.0010028175,0.049024634,0.000098608965,0.00036686682,0.000047157875,0.38765866,0.00017329353,0.009933326,0.11422002,0.431298,0.0010960795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033281313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071150594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8311375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017538993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006461383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50311613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998069918","doi":"10.1007/s11166-009-9077-x","title":"Dirty money: Is there a wage premium for working in a pollution intensive industry?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compensating differential; Wage; Economics; Value (mathematics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Labour economics; Differential (mechanical device); Work (physics); Risk premium; Efficiency wage; Wage share; Monetary economics","score_opus":0.05861902698601548,"score_gpt":0.23330259679490603,"score_spread":0.17468356980889055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998069918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99395263,0.002665143,0.0012607264,0.001281317,0.00012982068,0.00011140851,0.000031925763,0.0000023964021,0.0005646553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973139,0.001555811,0.0003735016,0.0005435583,0.00011736934,0.000001980038,0.0000020942323,0.0000056389877,0.0000861571],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992231,0.000013196171,0.0004761775,0.00013101868,0.00002117368,0.00013529691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926394,0.000041002266,0.0005524938,0.000070540795,0.000020264755,0.000051754945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006022884,0.000086640925,0.00026771874,0.00012532304,0.000053219293,0.0000279676,0.000065448214,0.00013097837,0.000046784975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012526878,0.00007950137,0.00008959225,0.000061576364,0.000023505194,0.0001653166,0.000011125065,0.00026575467,0.0000044861986],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019845022,0.00008190073,0.9451017,0.000005223804,0.000043140182,0.0000030120555,0.0027608078,0.0037362843,0.000028645178,0.0053302357,0.0011450431,0.04156557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014707198,0.00022761007,0.92791945,0.00005768467,0.0000143327925,0.0000095341575,0.0011699906,0.0057528596,0.000036759688,0.057787623,0.0054237475,0.00012969936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000108986096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025755882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052457385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016754605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010700473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32419717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028255406","doi":"10.1007/s11166-013-9171-y","title":"Does insurance fraud in automobile theft insurance fluctuate with the business cycle?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Insurance and Financial Risk Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Automobile insurance; Insurance fraud; Business; Actuarial science; Business cycle; Property insurance; Casualty insurance; Insurance policy; Economics","score_opus":0.005628133296612484,"score_gpt":0.18236821871689113,"score_spread":0.17674008542027864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028255406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933326,0.002221035,0.000995545,0.00154682,0.00040216217,0.00025251435,0.0000549943,0.000009228299,0.0011850782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99211806,0.0070194253,0.00023657587,0.00025607858,0.00018254404,0.000022390996,9.819308e-7,0.000016940028,0.00014700578],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986756,0.00003854309,0.0006652783,0.00022792442,0.000091524875,0.0003011304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854845,0.00011667432,0.00085927965,0.0002457325,0.0001688519,0.000060985447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081034395,0.00018794283,0.0004873751,0.00019602137,0.0001705374,0.00012311019,0.00031076116,0.000071999,0.00006739791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012518774,0.00009477925,0.00008011411,0.00047732322,0.00015091267,0.0005299885,0.00004541827,0.0003933167,0.000043101416],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013317761,0.00009659132,0.9373283,0.000032483254,0.000046512578,0.000018062457,0.0016642461,0.0073042447,0.000005586662,0.0059110173,0.0004937651,0.046966057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010351804,0.00008230338,0.9518214,0.00006674035,0.0000058611877,0.00000884974,0.00036076823,0.0006712206,0.000007182073,0.025225678,0.020530686,0.0001841216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021669853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005252344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04678194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056481527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028792982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38649857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054922874","doi":"10.1007/s11166-014-9186-z","title":"Take-up for genetic tests and ambiguity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Pennsylvania State University","keywords":"Ambiguity; Ambiguity aversion; Affect (linguistics); Economics; Test (biology); Value (mathematics); Expected utility hypothesis; Decision maker; Private information retrieval; Subjective expected utility; Ex-ante; Value of information; Outcome (game theory); Econometrics; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Psychology; Mathematics; Statistics; Biology; Machine learning","score_opus":0.07214745918230582,"score_gpt":0.3764352568517761,"score_spread":0.3042877976694703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054922874","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9884865,0.00034517466,0.010124111,0.00026442297,0.00060677214,0.000057930727,0.00001926352,0.000003900728,0.000091893184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922771,0.00024444607,0.006983374,0.00014216822,0.00022553882,8.257349e-7,2.381492e-7,0.0000061549104,0.00012014149],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853987,0.000104355306,0.0006632027,0.00020608454,0.00033433715,0.00015215173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964029,0.0021948304,0.00064206426,0.00020166315,0.0003767127,0.00018179408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032576371,0.00010387094,0.00035230993,0.00015633504,0.0001728492,0.00027033864,0.0002637968,0.00006912475,0.00002671586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045391438,0.00006459209,0.000119150965,0.00010569542,0.00009921305,0.0001563554,0.000054749537,0.0001478448,0.0000059950335],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000895904,0.00001995409,0.0388983,0.0000014167188,0.0000049216733,0.0000019007346,0.00015930999,0.00031995395,0.000034209792,0.000088763685,0.0036908393,0.95669085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017292949,0.0007386902,0.36763835,0.000039468916,0.00008666306,0.00018567777,0.00051198195,0.01184735,0.000040676518,0.44714358,0.1698323,0.00020593763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003827688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008817426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9564849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018501545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004400346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54341066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063996785","doi":"10.1007/s11166-005-5832-9","title":"Ranked Additive Utility Representations of Gambles: Old and New Axiomatizations","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Sports Analytics and Performance","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Von Neumann–Morgenstern utility theorem; Economics; Econometrics; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.027590469799145215,"score_gpt":0.25096454788716327,"score_spread":0.22337407808801807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063996785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9853154,0.0035270767,0.008153131,0.000557952,0.00010156335,0.000063017265,0.00022213679,0.0000033063448,0.0020564517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98985404,0.008345915,0.0012913441,0.000050507344,0.00014281271,4.7090924e-7,0.000004891299,0.000004559002,0.0003054345],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991594,0.000008208112,0.0006027937,0.00010389323,0.00003829438,0.00008741012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889046,0.000089062116,0.00073086395,0.00010408825,0.00008886446,0.00009663424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039530586,0.00006847416,0.00027736955,0.00015438623,0.00007849103,0.000026709862,0.000060151706,0.000039149083,0.0003151046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015210576,0.00006200923,0.000070838956,0.0001375848,0.00006540025,0.00021662306,0.000015709811,0.00010324453,0.0000026538255],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000115928284,0.00015009336,0.8629128,0.000030028365,0.00024054579,0.0000029761,0.005153651,0.009113321,0.0000074470177,0.07245966,0.007096413,0.042717148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015436349,0.000107761625,0.84839976,0.000050645504,0.000062561405,0.00002576887,0.0007067193,0.0653214,0.000048970945,0.025692666,0.05787683,0.0001633076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063479564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015509434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056208078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001693634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003086012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34501743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118335134","doi":"10.1007/s10797-006-6665-4","title":"Estimates of Own Lethal Risks and Anchoring Effects","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Anchoring; Cohort; Population; Psychology; Cohort effect; Actuarial science; Demography; Social psychology; Economics; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.06492304748172943,"score_gpt":0.3714043440293516,"score_spread":0.30648129654762213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118335134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99627554,0.0013756347,0.0016435743,0.000059962164,0.00034543627,0.000040115214,0.000010356948,0.000004066561,0.00024533743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99572116,0.00022985456,0.0038449029,0.000009609956,0.00016898621,3.193668e-7,2.4332618e-7,0.000005425237,0.000019492183],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842995,0.000087788816,0.00075155,0.00017447786,0.0004135186,0.00014270129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960296,0.002593836,0.00087617,0.00015993648,0.00024271416,0.000097728305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022013956,0.00011425962,0.00044666804,0.0002311762,0.00011136637,0.00015444194,0.00020949231,0.000070110545,0.000018785722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016627093,0.000070621645,0.0001141969,0.00016084836,0.00013474951,0.0002462281,0.00006749804,0.00020608798,0.000002748667],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082886974,0.00004853988,0.27205133,0.000005010724,0.000008880962,0.000031076688,0.0001391453,0.0022382925,0.0004277062,0.00012309178,0.0009078568,0.7239362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015816868,0.00055909675,0.6213027,0.00018827817,0.00013737274,0.00026912952,0.0005106009,0.004547395,0.0018214257,0.3638815,0.0049676867,0.00023306996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003457972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046917252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72370315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020047843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035523964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2879867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154333424","doi":"10.1023/a:1015683401986","title":"Replacement Cost Endorsement and Opportunistic Fraud in Automobile Insurance","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Automobile insurance; Business; Insurance fraud; Actuarial science; Internet privacy; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.03433640269979697,"score_gpt":0.23479112338403327,"score_spread":0.2004547206842363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154333424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96742743,0.018932808,0.00087875396,0.0003319977,0.0025003285,0.00066154025,0.001459186,0.000013022952,0.0077949264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95190287,0.0471633,0.0001714376,0.000104932704,0.00042339956,0.000022778164,0.000010068611,0.000023680612,0.0001775607],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99711275,0.000065490385,0.0019650399,0.00047220642,0.000070853086,0.00031363594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965949,0.00014112485,0.0026578284,0.0003161096,0.00006534214,0.00022471181],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019914208,0.00025547235,0.001229579,0.00037852977,0.00010140694,0.00015456384,0.00023443393,0.00026131637,0.00022047173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021913052,0.00030221103,0.00016973972,0.00007399461,0.00014854006,0.00013254957,0.00020609579,0.00072698743,0.000013595014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029291125,0.00037462803,0.9255424,0.0004250754,0.00035695292,0.000103169456,0.0034596436,0.0063934233,0.0000020517027,0.030158682,0.0029978128,0.029893251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009501989,0.00105705,0.33635435,0.0015133446,0.00012883004,0.00020494703,0.0014973042,0.036133617,0.000009987664,0.3346686,0.27693704,0.001992947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021145109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038749338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58918804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003733931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006521721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264690108","doi":"10.1007/s11166-018-9294-2","title":"Dinner with Bayes: On the revision of risk beliefs","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Psychology; Quarter (Canadian coin); Bayes' theorem; Population; Social psychology; Risk perception; Actuarial science; Bayesian probability; Medicine; Environmental health; Economics; Computer science; Geography; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.015073507704125527,"score_gpt":0.2872395212732116,"score_spread":0.2721660135690861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264690108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98494714,0.00013506196,0.0004621306,0.001388468,0.000121149664,0.000062926025,0.000009165972,0.0000039917354,0.012869986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956161,0.0034274647,0.00020215822,0.00025082973,0.00040007554,3.558491e-8,1.7858012e-7,0.0000025290158,0.000100674966],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990258,0.00019073627,0.00023467928,0.000041367173,0.0003910881,0.000116308445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857014,0.0003965439,0.0005538256,0.00008976082,0.0002913541,0.000098351724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019762425,0.000056500936,0.00013858428,0.0000570617,0.0003978955,0.000049398193,0.00012756977,0.00003845142,0.00021865193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013662027,0.00002532879,0.00004562807,0.00016089906,0.0002717028,0.00018529325,0.000010676668,0.00017491782,0.000006028213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013014602,0.00015240497,0.018731734,0.000019636229,0.00011901581,0.000003452874,0.3532193,0.00036034157,0.0000279381,0.04717286,0.08038068,0.49851117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022343672,0.0024762915,0.089412935,0.00074409845,0.00015199669,0.000016617363,0.092741646,0.00046635198,0.00042021132,0.008499035,0.8025656,0.0002708681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045331582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000329171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7221849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023561437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009440621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30603307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775632528","doi":"10.1007/s11166-017-9267-x","title":"Baseline risk and marginal willingness to pay for health risk reduction","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Universiteit van Tilburg; Royal Society; Universiteit van Amsterdam; University of Central Florida; Yale University; University of Alberta; European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Baseline (sea); Willingness to pay; Actuarial science; Economics; Preference; Marginal value; Marginal utility; Contingent valuation; Heart disease; Econometric model; Medicine; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.05143877736211261,"score_gpt":0.26383605666761606,"score_spread":0.21239727930550345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775632528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9586924,0.0015240968,0.037120007,0.0015722011,0.0005046511,0.00016147751,0.000362843,0.0000029963628,0.00005935743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756486,0.019388773,0.004316444,0.00007992098,0.0004224996,0.0000045036772,0.0000052558785,0.0000113400665,0.00012266067],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899507,0.00003778924,0.0005696871,0.00020620142,0.000029623217,0.00016162904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977911,0.00007670991,0.0017716727,0.0001730555,0.000025748008,0.0001617316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028010106,0.00010572322,0.00034861526,0.00008663079,0.0005966338,0.000099549005,0.00010247279,0.000053260803,0.000031449752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040685956,0.00009013247,0.00008219765,0.000019947225,0.000053844768,0.0002768673,0.000032091448,0.00018811328,0.000008259131],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002061335,0.00004344727,0.87083745,0.000018115561,0.00004629948,3.9835632e-7,0.00062315224,0.0034117978,0.0000031679563,0.00092122843,0.0011981768,0.12269062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015268796,0.0004300595,0.9287771,0.000029609424,0.00003590756,0.000019708676,0.00025909962,0.008627479,0.000011354764,0.022939816,0.03718716,0.00015582964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010804903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000093988085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12253479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011377528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019928273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45888853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899743006","doi":"10.1007/s11166-018-9291-5","title":"Reporting probabilistic expectations with dynamic uncertainty about possible distributions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Econometrics; Probability distribution; Counterfactual thinking; Bayes' theorem; Prior probability; Set (abstract data type); Probabilistic logic; Bayesian probability; Statistics; Distribution (mathematics); Mathematics; Joint probability distribution; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.05329607838990369,"score_gpt":0.3793879351215523,"score_spread":0.3260918567316486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899743006","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98435223,0.0001963454,0.01410643,0.00028460345,0.00043586234,0.000105900624,0.000081194936,0.000016782284,0.00042063495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954505,0.00004874511,0.0041432893,0.00002601239,0.00018566028,0.0000030852757,0.000004742933,0.000010433231,0.00012756124],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996282,0.00015690822,0.0022122439,0.00035734466,0.0007088565,0.00028267258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919462,0.0013414158,0.0042904187,0.00043141446,0.0017471495,0.00024339653],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003533109,0.00018048222,0.0005261193,0.00028879335,0.000639315,0.0004610181,0.00040549916,0.00008337782,0.00012104185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011390787,0.00010604169,0.00018129632,0.0006437721,0.00045085198,0.0003987307,0.000073268224,0.00033694532,0.000025383752],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005749705,0.00029344662,0.080726184,0.000005910558,0.00007047782,0.00012242311,0.0034218372,0.011992891,0.00011505296,0.0011108017,0.002522575,0.89904344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031253004,0.003067012,0.28419957,0.00056905823,0.0005382505,0.0025764434,0.030136058,0.06185028,0.0001014341,0.5953142,0.017508667,0.0010137229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012568434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010902184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8980297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001577949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035741163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192529810","doi":"10.1007/s11166-006-9519-7","title":"Lottery qualities","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; Certainty; Mathematical economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Prospect theory; Point (geometry); Test (biology); Decision theory; Key (lock); Economics; Computer science; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04168384935939519,"score_gpt":0.3524790080602633,"score_spread":0.3107951587008681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3192529810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99567294,0.0012343838,0.00011062215,0.00007920294,0.00051612407,0.000022359452,0.00001481037,0.000007569416,0.0023420164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983015,0.00007633684,0.00013922543,0.00003270633,0.00024766347,8.898166e-7,0.0000019986464,0.0000064174415,0.0011932837],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935997,0.00008002624,0.00025292614,0.000070534836,0.00011204131,0.00012452126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994954,0.000104893596,0.00021055483,0.000082045706,0.00006112851,0.000046007895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022600418,0.000075692704,0.00015791677,0.00008221365,0.00006009962,0.00002430921,0.00005239073,0.000048356203,0.00016504293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013121087,0.000052715794,0.000079450736,0.00004420161,0.000045413322,0.00004943729,0.0000075193825,0.00013598154,0.000013497794],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020007718,0.0003031306,0.9608911,0.0000039148686,0.00007657461,0.00017659663,0.0016636194,0.000056423996,0.00004646558,0.0034839693,0.0069702114,0.026127888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016384873,0.00018664401,0.97998154,0.0000166166,0.00013623595,0.00023000212,0.0012974219,0.00000243296,0.000034182107,0.0062362542,0.010154837,0.00008533424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014219014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004636789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026042553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018717137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013097052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21496876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378416836","doi":"10.1007/s11166-023-09412-4","title":"Advantageous selection without moral hazard","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Swenson College of Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota Duluth; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Fondation du Risque; Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Moral hazard; Context (archaeology); Actuarial science; Selection (genetic algorithm); Product (mathematics); Risk aversion (psychology); Morale hazard; Face (sociological concept); Economics; Hazard; Property (philosophy); Microeconomics; Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Risk pool; Insurance policy; Computer science; Expected utility hypothesis; Key person insurance; Incentive; Financial economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.011985967540218549,"score_gpt":0.24025383068826067,"score_spread":0.22826786314804212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378416836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986422,0.00015897627,0.00008305108,0.0001119029,0.00035835695,0.00005404947,0.000002069763,0.000056892168,0.0005324662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99779004,0.0005002351,0.00019369816,0.00016272865,0.0011209099,0.000001008038,0.000009010841,0.000014880687,0.00020751712],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903697,0.000015345608,0.00034810693,0.0001167182,0.00028857338,0.00019426903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991811,0.000038288843,0.00039276428,0.00007282123,0.00029563266,0.000019423698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000549219,0.00012664362,0.00026124442,0.00043862674,0.00019457043,0.00015186769,0.00010114671,0.000047242167,0.00007791782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017695558,0.00009839983,0.00012475395,0.0007224588,0.000034682147,0.00066944974,0.00004627928,0.00019068233,0.000060877992],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010148222,0.00001791074,0.97892004,0.000030034971,0.000018171691,0.000025891242,0.00005618064,0.003044473,0.0001359563,0.0006526886,0.007116193,0.0098809805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011032466,0.000059656995,0.8311936,0.00009752548,0.00039117743,0.000027208147,0.00031071948,0.075773165,0.000037451475,0.011247855,0.079463474,0.00029491523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025993687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026660445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14772643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029303974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019621704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40126285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}