{"meta":{"query_hash":"4ae71cf5d939","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing"},"cohort_total":723,"direct_labels_cover":71,"predictions_cover":723,"exported":723,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4ae71cf5d939","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Scholarly+Publishing"},"results":[{"id":"W141063451","doi":"","title":"Everyday Book Marketing: Promotion Ideas to Fit Your Regularly Scheduled Life by Midge Raymond (review)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Everyday life; Midge; Promotion (chess); Marketing; Sociology; Business; Ecology; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Biology; Gall; Politics","score_opus":0.023215245820090935,"score_gpt":0.24424699969293012,"score_spread":0.2210317538728392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W141063451","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26094937,0.12224982,0.12925851,0.4716753,0.0035670905,0.0010325083,0.000013748663,0.0003801103,0.0108735375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58651143,0.004818669,0.20584463,0.18327473,0.005305479,0.000043078933,0.00003110437,0.00020016416,0.013970712],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950317,0.0010366708,0.0011882103,0.0004968716,0.0017118319,0.0005346923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954193,0.0002857639,0.0012005151,0.0007590228,0.0013589681,0.0009764012],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0129266735,0.0002959957,0.0005663252,0.00048957736,0.0002735511,0.026707264,0.0041938173,0.00021524641,0.00013696894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008242229,0.0002504892,0.0002560777,0.0011080143,0.00002107952,0.17975718,0.000650355,0.0015616323,0.000053109623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069812915,0.00021526898,0.0046178806,0.00044963488,0.00010971778,0.000028841858,0.00046647943,0.000027341215,0.0057194727,0.0025083688,0.95350623,0.032280955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012677788,0.00055304397,0.047754426,0.0033271974,0.00006207296,0.00017995408,0.000070155766,0.0016352237,0.0006883182,0.0014847999,0.942381,0.0005960193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013468021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000013770845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32556206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000092370195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033769858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1478468644","doi":"10.3138/jsp.47.1.02","title":"University Press Forum 2015","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theme (computing); Value (mathematics); Media studies; Management; Sociology; Library science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Economics","score_opus":0.096506355651328,"score_gpt":0.2491165271133189,"score_spread":0.1526101714619909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1478468644","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16430062,0.005620411,0.00075533637,0.09269022,0.0052601486,0.00017620865,0.000047521902,0.0001756144,0.7309739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97941536,0.00007262173,0.0015258483,0.0007491403,0.0014313522,3.2626886e-7,0.000011865829,0.000022845044,0.016770624],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979072,0.00033841236,0.00044131643,0.0001234786,0.00093410135,0.0002554663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99381536,0.00013409546,0.0006737668,0.0003723821,0.0046034623,0.0004009485],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004931948,0.00012275702,0.0002248975,0.0003915548,0.0003848773,0.068625,0.0019272917,0.0001261164,0.000054855234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045363656,0.00010860957,0.00013398091,0.00011977046,0.00009652998,0.24636894,0.00029205982,0.0020114095,0.000011336988],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007970545,0.000095007126,0.00175889,0.000005630111,0.00006736247,0.000028449187,0.013194633,0.000023385817,0.00002919369,0.22889493,0.7523587,0.003464127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008581583,0.00012475622,0.00030860025,0.000049443748,0.00003306311,0.00003741036,0.02264785,0.000040775514,0.000013326702,0.0028324355,0.9729246,0.00012960802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005108404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013865173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81511474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026626387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037000043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9323419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486106096","doi":"","title":"Stylish Academic Writing. by Helen Sword (review)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"SWORD; Literature; Aesthetics; History; Art; Visual arts; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03739845313240346,"score_gpt":0.25362167675739256,"score_spread":0.21622322362498908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486106096","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33114132,0.27368417,0.00013817126,0.20408368,0.0028188545,0.00069001754,0.0000684317,0.000262756,0.1871126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94622093,0.018417189,0.0011012249,0.02092996,0.0036252239,0.000032698368,0.000078489924,0.00008702908,0.009507265],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958299,0.00049045036,0.0015466395,0.00023669313,0.0014098117,0.0004865413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99246806,0.00040377554,0.0015479606,0.00055390014,0.0046131057,0.00041318024],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007658035,0.00025519967,0.00050719286,0.00042842425,0.0006430197,0.07990277,0.0030940261,0.0002558934,0.002024199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008525215,0.00021268732,0.00026035504,0.00023632198,0.00013131241,0.27957284,0.000315447,0.0064284666,0.00013083627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056128947,0.00006123861,0.0015536284,0.00008481864,0.000063284555,0.000002871485,0.0026712923,5.4094403e-7,0.00054919254,0.0075418195,0.9526751,0.03479059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052244536,0.00010524884,0.0015999564,0.0015900389,0.000068113615,0.000053977605,0.0026410823,0.000016932421,0.00003897165,0.0041382085,0.9889273,0.00029771446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042222528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023183966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6150796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018741227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000200421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1490938079","doi":"","title":"How to Not Write Bad: The Most Common Writing Problems and the Best Ways to Avoid Them by Ben Yagoda, and: Polishing Your Prose: How to Turn First Drafts into Finished Work by Steven M. Cahn & Victor L. Cahn (review)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Aesthetics; Computer science; Sociology; Linguistics; Epistemology; Visual arts; Literature; History; Art; Philosophy; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.029401776251100128,"score_gpt":0.2418023148713455,"score_spread":0.21240053862024535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1490938079","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24462983,0.039221685,0.00053695834,0.7059887,0.0007104116,0.0015960253,0.00018634571,0.000062332176,0.007067727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732837,0.0012653179,0.00067863445,0.018738957,0.0025605084,0.00009884589,0.000018085084,0.000087111395,0.0032688412],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99592286,0.00043906408,0.0009732226,0.00051249773,0.0014401127,0.0007122452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955369,0.0010551758,0.00093675347,0.0005945915,0.0013711792,0.0005053518],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008015147,0.0005059213,0.0010333781,0.00025606802,0.002390155,0.06359099,0.0017713303,0.0001273241,0.000045857585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007900351,0.00029147288,0.00021983139,0.00045068492,0.00029622298,0.020193106,0.0010053044,0.0020318183,0.00000781089],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015855262,0.00014285647,0.0042561865,0.00047903773,0.00078748877,0.0000131489105,0.24768132,0.0000394059,0.00039008187,0.0076515633,0.69568336,0.042716973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012495188,0.0003352689,0.00060694036,0.0047780257,0.0005561592,0.00003713021,0.069091626,0.000022275042,0.00006495848,0.0007462688,0.92182744,0.0006843909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001301649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037724392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72865385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014347464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050280578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1495110412","doi":"","title":"Palace of Books by Roger Grenier (review)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Themes in Literature Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.04138910010497873,"score_gpt":0.2482917252520654,"score_spread":0.20690262514708666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1495110412","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056614414,0.5283995,0.00030506542,0.029765375,0.0038800086,0.00025461754,0.00012117277,0.00005747933,0.38060233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92304826,0.0027489017,0.0029792709,0.012464182,0.005376903,0.000005155734,0.00003831184,0.00009524019,0.05324377],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976038,0.000160884,0.00087841664,0.00012209493,0.0010385754,0.0001962347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99496335,0.0000907319,0.0010730324,0.0002696116,0.0033683218,0.00023492938],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003559255,0.00014418694,0.0004679157,0.00027916834,0.00008592762,0.008594361,0.0008029981,0.000085474625,0.00075567345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026099898,0.00010533994,0.00028629403,0.00012827676,0.00009703145,0.044082537,0.00009763143,0.0011632616,0.000012104706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002096877,0.00005755244,0.0005914929,0.00007782826,0.00021413101,0.000011251959,0.0065361084,0.0000015635115,0.00016702437,0.017347232,0.97226876,0.0027060688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041598658,0.000094943156,0.000026986429,0.0006611854,0.0002010185,0.000030187974,0.0015436551,0.0000031162774,0.00014094432,0.0023345775,0.9944263,0.00012106978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042694028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015289655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86643386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007608176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013312469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9924348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1521812281","doi":"","title":"Writing for Conferences: A Handbook for Graduate Students and Faculty by Leo Mallette and Clare Berger (review)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Graduate students; Library science; Sociology; Computer science; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.6982719281394875,"score_gpt":0.571062810058546,"score_spread":0.12720911808094149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1521812281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8499354,0.095600516,0.018384952,0.033479176,0.00049862324,0.0015119625,0.00022782564,0.000012093699,0.000349464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9299033,0.024826769,0.031490315,0.009110917,0.000673601,0.00016052905,0.00003790074,0.000053227537,0.0037434157],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903795,0.00018600035,0.0013367707,0.0004670516,0.0070854165,0.00054524804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9751902,0.00458317,0.0011669509,0.00025074664,0.018046573,0.00076232787],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04429987,0.00017469675,0.00055556296,0.008774709,0.00046775877,0.11278483,0.0022927842,0.00015892531,0.0000763408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10459084,0.00011108267,0.00018614512,0.011311751,0.0000972816,0.045705114,0.00058412936,0.0009134754,0.0000048315787],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020344885,0.00005749533,0.13906476,0.0000868203,0.000058503254,0.0000027479553,0.000110123656,3.4697078e-7,0.0009776967,0.00008522338,0.71171045,0.14782546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007887064,0.0015963713,0.39388508,0.0024277233,0.00015202015,0.00020552694,0.0050617745,0.0015347899,0.00050936214,0.024887772,0.5609695,0.0008830121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005567766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004313962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25482032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006246897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018502315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9840944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552151481","doi":"10.3138/jsp.42.2.243","title":"The Peer-Review Process for Articles in Iran's Scientific Journals","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Originality; Peer review; Process (computing); Creativity; Scientific literature; Population; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Sociology; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.6998329989555784,"score_gpt":0.5995986486184482,"score_spread":0.10023435033713013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552151481","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77623767,0.021708148,0.001111153,0.19515951,0.004054624,0.00038959674,0.000014732823,0.00000650167,0.0013180616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939455,0.0008215667,0.0013832172,0.00072788773,0.00051541126,0.000009886398,7.5438794e-7,0.00001396604,0.0025818038],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9662529,0.00039714974,0.002495611,0.00047035457,0.029522467,0.00086147647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8111122,0.023346748,0.004363467,0.0017607431,0.15767346,0.001743361],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.38872263,0.00013629074,0.0004296056,0.032798532,0.0011119348,0.30514517,0.008307007,0.0001656855,0.00015872146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.74587154,0.00007006731,0.00033519062,0.116925426,0.00024908484,0.07965872,0.00039433318,0.003415064,0.000020326972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005498628,0.00019413266,0.16561064,0.00004751804,0.000022727485,0.000026160404,0.00046142298,0.000023948622,0.0074348766,0.0013159406,0.3168453,0.50796235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011739326,0.00016499756,0.12123152,0.0003842189,0.000018040688,0.00021607743,0.0017189747,0.00083689153,0.0011451012,0.10938505,0.7635184,0.00020681636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009980567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012192586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5077555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000091287584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008616889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564242148","doi":"","title":"Scholarly Publication in a Changing Academic Landscape: Models for Success by Lynée Lewis Gaillet and Letizia Guglielmo (review)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"LYN; Sociology; History; Biology","score_opus":0.09555489991989298,"score_gpt":0.28715248097669605,"score_spread":0.19159758105680308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1564242148","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2858757,0.40291077,0.0038353808,0.24570203,0.002200046,0.0015866795,0.0002677266,0.00022407016,0.0573976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97510713,0.009852193,0.002207924,0.0076246867,0.0015643564,0.00009649023,0.00026711737,0.00009011453,0.0031900092],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99600685,0.0004555316,0.001407404,0.00035339574,0.0012007382,0.00057610736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99172235,0.00038115925,0.0013349396,0.00047227225,0.0056090257,0.00048026757],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018939856,0.0002879846,0.0005897716,0.0037357952,0.0005005915,0.063974544,0.0019807585,0.00033501387,0.000045202865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013941707,0.00025664378,0.00015219272,0.0013413688,0.00009480929,0.29143545,0.0003350847,0.0038894224,0.0000043592077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015094245,0.00020516975,0.01000181,0.00038555817,0.00011903742,0.0000065224485,0.022226283,0.000050932438,0.0002341561,0.08170922,0.843864,0.041046366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032981709,0.0002500883,0.00076121313,0.0020898078,0.00011667911,0.00009020045,0.00738275,0.0015900529,0.000024143914,0.015399426,0.96843094,0.00056651974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017781975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000071815106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6892314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027050215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037851688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W162776387","doi":"","title":"The Scholar's Survival Manual: A Road Map for Students, Faculty, and Administrators by Martin H. Krieger (review)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Road map; Sociology; Management; Operations management; Library science; Geography; Computer science; Cartography; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.04619019630191641,"score_gpt":0.323451234504132,"score_spread":0.2772610382022156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W162776387","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6106701,0.13403368,0.0005070289,0.2265601,0.006371739,0.001406852,0.00032977565,0.00019927065,0.019921439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9688711,0.0060518705,0.0014831092,0.00705819,0.0033737668,0.0000764469,0.00018312313,0.00012843274,0.01277393],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99587375,0.00078651146,0.0011685173,0.0002644667,0.0014599634,0.0004468046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945722,0.0006885628,0.0012388272,0.0005439981,0.00261283,0.00034356958],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.023694323,0.00026430198,0.00045900242,0.00016927117,0.0020724232,0.11500426,0.0026494728,0.00015347484,0.000050177267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013050792,0.00017910817,0.0002321731,0.00010925934,0.00018473092,0.06932949,0.00035629116,0.0027533742,0.000007880643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097058815,0.00018059449,0.0076382216,0.00019095847,0.00024120531,0.0000023639307,0.0031002893,4.0844384e-7,0.00009410745,0.039274834,0.8974405,0.051739484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009478564,0.0002462849,0.0034626122,0.00046853413,0.00010366654,0.000016159833,0.0028163912,0.000016379665,0.000013689518,0.0025436354,0.9891379,0.0002269268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008803772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015200733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35820103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000095659154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014078523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1722754901","doi":"10.3138/jsp.46.4.03","title":"Do Editorial Board Members in Library and Information Science Publish Disproportionately in the Journals for Which They Serve as Board Members?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Editorial board; Publication; Library science; On board; Quality (philosophy); Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Law; History","score_opus":0.3070951898295489,"score_gpt":0.47969082041121336,"score_spread":0.17259563058166444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1722754901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9246588,0.0009471474,0.00012698564,0.044951223,0.015056961,0.00045179352,0.000020381203,0.000010141141,0.013776608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926931,0.00038027405,0.0018066134,0.00079900713,0.00424825,0.000010145141,0.0000032726582,0.000011363068,0.000047968435],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9717105,0.00063258415,0.0024216801,0.00044952478,0.023971308,0.0008143821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96249086,0.006050499,0.0027111724,0.0007255553,0.026581578,0.0014403294],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19510193,0.00018907356,0.00044626236,0.06258448,0.00041251554,0.31243765,0.0064455904,0.0003101777,0.0000710814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.38800213,0.00011033722,0.0001447661,0.11515202,0.00016563023,0.5888901,0.0009806755,0.002630725,0.000006623396],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006503983,0.00025712102,0.6265056,0.00002118857,0.000029214978,0.000041268337,0.008330861,0.0009597539,0.00015876332,0.014152527,0.3100745,0.038818777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005301944,0.0007773499,0.34261513,0.00016673259,0.000016965001,0.00021254248,0.034205154,0.0023739524,0.00011636078,0.11161566,0.50218135,0.0004168645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025492776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000091221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28389052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029795952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030618657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1751085664","doi":"10.3138/jsp.46.4.05","title":"Institutional, Motivational, and Resource Factors Influencing Health Scientists' Data-Sharing Behaviours","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theory of planned behavior; Resource (disambiguation); Structural equation modeling; Shared resource; Survey data collection; Data sharing; Psychology; Knowledge management; Institutional theory; Social psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Management; Economics; Medicine; Social science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.22972116285069621,"score_gpt":0.37250446184445474,"score_spread":0.14278329899375852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1751085664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9733267,0.0018156038,0.00073515315,0.008031101,0.00080543343,0.00011597502,0.000011944012,0.000039187795,0.0151189435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99579346,0.000043149652,0.002337314,0.00054937514,0.0007106579,5.631947e-7,0.000032192096,0.000012302778,0.0005209609],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968773,0.00018683446,0.00059016,0.0003052483,0.0016820936,0.00035832633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997323,0.00012073728,0.00065029005,0.00028218803,0.0011099958,0.0005137878],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01645258,0.000114341325,0.00022207494,0.0006415385,0.0013235582,0.026443712,0.0018315639,0.00009773861,0.000017355163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011813014,0.00010722802,0.000043568725,0.00076920673,0.00019167484,0.09006034,0.000938182,0.0009121992,0.0000020680434],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010324235,0.00005907926,0.9013574,0.000017901168,0.000042220305,0.000017232527,0.024835266,0.00010207878,0.000017140557,0.03208342,0.03521298,0.006244942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013222805,0.00010012124,0.3709078,0.00056139694,0.000057480094,0.000026781849,0.0585732,0.00022349338,0.000009842802,0.0043950486,0.56344485,0.00037769318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015916774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005413242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53044957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058790995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011493753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W180306368","doi":"","title":"Write edited by The Guardian (review)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Guardian; History; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03203867399692239,"score_gpt":0.23695367563211558,"score_spread":0.2049150016351932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W180306368","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032099787,0.1034086,0.0006702057,0.46206248,0.0059908577,0.0003500965,0.000051410087,0.0001517065,0.39521486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9382128,0.004980942,0.0006133599,0.038946517,0.008796837,0.000011598236,0.000071998154,0.00006695577,0.008298954],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967327,0.00079496653,0.0008779061,0.00014872263,0.0011480523,0.00029764607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994773,0.00056017796,0.0010273069,0.0006665587,0.0027646427,0.00020833658],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0138446875,0.00017179061,0.00033693458,0.00023996315,0.0008957077,0.07452707,0.0027352439,0.00011170614,0.00035216176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012185506,0.00010833655,0.0002486765,0.00019461858,0.00014232274,0.11866879,0.0001902747,0.0032992838,0.00003299821],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069751927,0.000043032403,0.0003133322,0.000032905213,0.000054664542,0.0000011729297,0.0024116994,0.0000011872766,0.000096651725,0.028072363,0.9380412,0.030924797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003467889,0.00008053046,0.00058733975,0.0005076081,0.00006693358,0.00003895764,0.00098996,0.000031170388,0.000011305113,0.002549486,0.9946492,0.00014074398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018561813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000068116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.906113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000090007255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000104072344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99900013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963502878","doi":"10.1353/scp.2011.0010","title":"Merchants of Culture: The Publishing Business in the Twenty-First Century (review)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Subject (documents); Polity; Sociology; History; Law; Media studies; Political science; Politics; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.088043472680897,"score_gpt":0.25345022561166064,"score_spread":0.16540675293076362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963502878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19395821,0.26688525,0.00014770454,0.19507676,0.007179025,0.0013006238,0.000085913256,0.0001019872,0.33526453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97839427,0.014679784,0.0003960205,0.005137555,0.0010791372,0.000013089282,0.000019879533,0.0000298818,0.0002503742],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99516577,0.0010795572,0.0014644997,0.00020143096,0.0016855709,0.00040315854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918634,0.00050392025,0.0019293398,0.0009130478,0.0046675815,0.00012268838],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020060392,0.00024017137,0.00046935634,0.00048506242,0.0007655693,0.047108654,0.0061259414,0.00017611383,0.00024852285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015744286,0.00012594931,0.00025936277,0.00082132436,0.00024387703,0.18513328,0.00039409436,0.0044477964,0.0000052656887],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013257629,0.00089799205,0.013711758,0.0005912409,0.00027129013,0.000049614988,0.3628316,0.0000074589248,0.00009036422,0.1862684,0.4117903,0.023357412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009136585,0.000115104114,0.04731928,0.0029676168,0.00016210064,0.00012631761,0.037549973,0.000009972974,0.000017773447,0.0062516304,0.90428543,0.0002811254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015384646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011212566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78443605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001130903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023750034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99925137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963945464","doi":"10.1353/scp.2011.0007","title":"Expanding the American Mind: Books and the Popularization of Knowledge (review)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Culture of the United States; American literature; Classics; History; Art history; Law; Media studies; Literature; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.0792987872227658,"score_gpt":0.27224251168236646,"score_spread":0.19294372445960067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963945464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6754287,0.12924257,0.00044276772,0.02851336,0.0013868769,0.0005149819,0.000014120647,0.000034815497,0.16442183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99431515,0.003213396,0.00044492926,0.0010449655,0.00042423018,0.0000046056766,0.000003128129,0.0000149102425,0.0005347013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977547,0.00073841953,0.00077272305,0.00010268952,0.0004718552,0.00015963521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99577457,0.00042035486,0.0017225811,0.00040587573,0.0015974728,0.00007914694],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009443407,0.00012063915,0.0003577299,0.00022023385,0.0006181863,0.011386696,0.0013836542,0.000040066327,0.000066274755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00472876,0.000062124884,0.0001538874,0.000168275,0.00056443556,0.039097603,0.0002144695,0.0014562098,0.0000017393206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037524692,0.0002800965,0.017387107,0.00025273356,0.00047393027,0.0000058175497,0.27871427,0.0000011806655,0.0004120795,0.47882882,0.051527143,0.17174159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0058909585,0.0009052199,0.09690447,0.005690935,0.0014186056,0.00034522926,0.0807496,0.00017333776,0.00055012846,0.0568961,0.7495364,0.000939017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005214296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015717965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69800925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038364018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000953681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9896396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964249870","doi":"10.3138/jsp.45-1-001","title":"The Impact of E-Readers and E-Books on the Library of Congress and the US Copyright Office","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Staffing; Software portability; Library of congress; Publishing; Library science; Business; Advertising; Management; Computer science; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.015074515381997307,"score_gpt":0.20995149862613816,"score_spread":0.19487698324414085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964249870","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9499144,0.0016922196,0.000105515384,0.023113195,0.00020281228,0.00017826022,0.0000018366736,0.000011865713,0.0247799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99766886,0.00013548673,0.00039864937,0.0005816538,0.00006117689,0.0000020474856,1.82598e-7,0.000006192995,0.0011457695],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985707,0.00020327403,0.00043537718,0.00010130422,0.0005375314,0.000151855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99679166,0.0019302863,0.00064375903,0.00022102031,0.00030504813,0.00010822475],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012480033,0.00010419116,0.00018846286,0.00015761757,0.00032266293,0.029397253,0.0013477547,0.000054475157,0.000019592557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010623997,0.000038694936,0.00010236646,0.0003989874,0.00030143777,0.05993935,0.00033865092,0.0005685782,7.8109696e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012689922,0.0001868198,0.110995874,0.000058197675,0.0011628822,0.00001963234,0.018650781,0.00016768905,0.0007191869,0.16853142,0.61892635,0.07931216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009003956,0.0017566909,0.78564876,0.0008786495,0.00006926453,0.00051470904,0.0066394727,0.008805686,0.009176094,0.100943044,0.07586553,0.00069814984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005797882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.651731e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6746529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012402025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022791284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9716103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964557241","doi":"10.1353/scp.2012.0004","title":"The Importance of Encouraging Librarians to Publish in Peer-Reviewed Publications","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Apprehension; Publication; Hostility; Field (mathematics); Resistance (ecology); Advice (programming); Psychology; Public relations; Sociology; Library science; Computer science; Political science; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.07632522094347405,"score_gpt":0.28354342424586815,"score_spread":0.2072182033023941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964557241","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38944143,0.017149067,0.00029062844,0.39308915,0.0036535126,0.0004720106,0.000036499692,0.0000881703,0.19577952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991193,0.00017990822,0.0017195672,0.0016847597,0.0014056345,0.000018797042,0.000015799904,0.00003164097,0.0037509168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957199,0.0004901316,0.0016332751,0.00016108893,0.0014450725,0.00055050483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915397,0.0007809614,0.0014828481,0.00084779627,0.004946513,0.00040217224],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021171002,0.00017975392,0.00038199383,0.00093740603,0.0006953099,0.08145469,0.0032392256,0.00012233651,0.0001947672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034477152,0.0001287711,0.00019676216,0.0008129061,0.00011994744,0.26400834,0.00037023594,0.0024931317,0.000010064572],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026293315,0.00023681755,0.2224584,0.000024308236,0.00006897732,0.0000010807391,0.03248255,0.000011347262,0.00012445582,0.44065267,0.2909834,0.012929684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003234594,0.00004465438,0.05495012,0.00017043925,0.000024972225,0.000018980709,0.009213344,0.000012607872,0.000019420657,0.003809091,0.9312568,0.00015613712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016973009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064518926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6402734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020260572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038369908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965225627","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.2.93","title":"A Different Kind of Profession","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal profession; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Management; Political science; Law; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.10493787927397605,"score_gpt":0.3799694554561572,"score_spread":0.2750315761821811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965225627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85529304,0.0001671638,0.00016839897,0.10568173,0.001257359,0.000056722438,0.0000010011083,0.000007667458,0.037366897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957363,0.000104048224,0.0012741701,0.0005870661,0.00062093115,8.0242626e-7,7.7967434e-7,0.000004568455,0.001671357],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809515,0.0003028236,0.00047143322,0.000058230155,0.0009421829,0.00013015556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961498,0.00029303643,0.0008875684,0.00008835277,0.0024486028,0.00013266141],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003078065,0.000048640468,0.00013269702,0.0002977334,0.0005009746,0.0034913449,0.00041626225,0.00011200309,0.0002629715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0150776375,0.000037828715,0.0000673228,0.0006363941,0.00008729526,0.070433155,0.000031368258,0.0014128116,0.0000033299227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012203662,0.0010837726,0.38717684,0.00003556233,0.00011916888,0.000033425462,0.21169949,0.000007371803,0.008113988,0.15784998,0.20879632,0.024962034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070884166,0.00010578799,0.22942613,0.00017786425,0.000029566558,0.000056765424,0.03481248,0.0000029766509,0.00073638296,0.004436575,0.72937167,0.00013496033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005155558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006796941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52057534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000113070055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013997583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99754316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966061097","doi":"10.3138/jsp.32.1.24","title":"Academic Publishing and the University Presses: The Case in a Developing Region (Saudi Arabia)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Socioeconomic Development in MENA","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Islam; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Middle East; State (computer science); Library science; Management; Sociology; Geography; Social science; Economics; Law; Archaeology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04331760572904371,"score_gpt":0.273924413964856,"score_spread":0.2306068082358123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966061097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7524407,0.0013257894,0.00015704209,0.22609915,0.00036558372,0.00020867004,7.707779e-7,0.000018728859,0.019383557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98869604,0.0048817624,0.0012999756,0.0032917357,0.0006003212,0.0000018460082,6.520093e-7,0.000013274164,0.0012144151],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968496,0.0013948424,0.00057153555,0.00020095869,0.0005883118,0.0003947702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968393,0.0017935287,0.0005981847,0.00016551,0.0004453752,0.00015812757],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020969667,0.00012030533,0.00024700674,0.00025736986,0.0015053152,0.023431972,0.001627349,0.0002989461,0.00008080667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00970139,0.000083409126,0.00007789891,0.00074728945,0.0004884229,0.100641474,0.00018439212,0.0032490261,0.0000037959205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005057877,0.000045531397,0.14394847,0.00004373511,0.00023938176,0.0026706185,0.3218283,0.00017241032,0.000010231387,0.1563995,0.0882171,0.28591892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033568083,0.000015786434,0.04013043,0.00042535178,0.00005509334,0.0015884578,0.14266546,0.000070094255,0.0000031506968,0.027304778,0.7840873,0.00029728518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024180673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009930145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6958702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007947896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000862579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967352121","doi":"10.3138/jsp.41.2.163","title":"Launching a New Academic Journal: Twenty Years Later","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theme (computing); Servant; Management; Public relations; History; Library science; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.02465673507917752,"score_gpt":0.2382995838600752,"score_spread":0.21364284878089768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967352121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7484344,0.007961614,0.008273467,0.16997172,0.005656331,0.0003145069,0.0000012259015,0.0002049209,0.05918178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96376055,0.00029053443,0.002476627,0.018118609,0.013435409,2.131375e-7,0.0000039467564,0.000034205106,0.0018799156],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759406,0.000021126827,0.0007512832,0.00015085112,0.0011460701,0.0003365838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975874,0.0000415352,0.0011542387,0.00011468793,0.0010346456,0.0000674869],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028988568,0.0001753744,0.0002839868,0.00085683155,0.00035639957,0.031818993,0.0010019975,0.00013778194,0.00032971412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029156392,0.00014662289,0.00016294683,0.0008767643,0.000016115311,0.12003863,0.00023550581,0.0020477863,0.00006861464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006454589,0.000063420135,0.12691554,0.000027654873,0.0001654449,0.0001593547,0.00040986293,0.00017946547,0.0005042165,0.019977404,0.78735095,0.06418213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012175407,0.000031514024,0.3082564,0.00021840881,0.00013597665,0.00006981749,0.00040322388,0.0000500834,0.000013027138,0.06990115,0.61944854,0.00025435552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026526357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005018628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21532612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009538501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006906967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96918607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967756152","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0006","title":"The of Value Knowledge Created by Individual Scientists and Research Groups","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Knowledge management; Sociology; Psychology; Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics","score_opus":0.08256540679038533,"score_gpt":0.302284445431952,"score_spread":0.21971903864156667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967756152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8184921,0.0031241148,0.00007637753,0.005405719,0.0010106432,0.00018343236,0.0000024775402,0.00002124622,0.17168388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970053,0.000089303394,0.0001657015,0.000369834,0.0008917951,0.0000022187849,0.000005982103,0.00001621475,0.0014536894],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973587,0.000097591284,0.0006805024,0.00016717866,0.0013660188,0.00033004288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993609,0.0002263768,0.0006426612,0.00018884003,0.0052994736,0.0000336085],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014641642,0.000113539834,0.00019689459,0.0011231817,0.0012138963,0.02182011,0.0010069849,0.00009323067,0.000020854235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00509166,0.000079651065,0.000064000385,0.0019587965,0.0003038114,0.034392092,0.00067918154,0.0011695452,0.000017344983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007754994,0.00026314385,0.050140023,0.00012337863,0.00013968648,0.000028701601,0.0009423131,0.0000014267487,0.0014824823,0.46131295,0.4724535,0.013034827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019639058,0.000073341515,0.08354329,0.00023052025,0.00005864194,0.000053205848,0.0033615178,0.00028973023,0.00022627045,0.010298083,0.8996756,0.00022587711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004545162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012352208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45101488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060390783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010241202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97919536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967871590","doi":"10.3138/jsp.33.3.125","title":"Current Copyright Law and Fair Use: The Council of Editors of Learned Journals, Keynote Address, MLA Convention 2000","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Fair use; Intellectual property; Law; Convention; Doctrine; Political science; Copyright Act; Sociology; Copyright law","score_opus":0.13342100080601832,"score_gpt":0.2529080277657476,"score_spread":0.11948702695972929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967871590","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.602841,0.08634273,0.00091071863,0.03639616,0.022402536,0.0010290453,0.00003635056,0.000113239985,0.24992822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920332,0.0007783237,0.000052641433,0.0006277062,0.005589827,0.0000011443192,0.0000021907276,0.000025367885,0.00088963367],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99642843,0.00008342091,0.0011527706,0.00018469221,0.0018742975,0.0002764134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917289,0.00023282891,0.0019314925,0.00023231725,0.005822536,0.000051911582],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046567023,0.00020517131,0.0004448359,0.0003377698,0.0003412556,0.014134112,0.00076098094,0.0001520098,0.0022576486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005157427,0.00012296239,0.00023061979,0.0006169701,0.0002243469,0.081192635,0.00022078083,0.0016218651,0.000015528663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030078067,0.0003481422,0.005815866,0.00034346402,0.00023070736,0.000013156897,0.0014490753,0.000024747238,0.0031794116,0.0033166036,0.96541244,0.01956559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012177152,0.00007681472,0.0031040215,0.0006960553,0.00016324475,0.000028178458,0.00030788264,0.00313658,0.00038783884,0.0026413437,0.98805565,0.00018465884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005148638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006579588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38919216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002117752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023600711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969947428","doi":"10.3138/jsp.43.2.230","title":"When You're Criticized","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Public Relations and Crisis Communication","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Zhejiang University of Science and Technology","keywords":"Criticism; Subject (documents); Perception; Psychology; Positive economics; Public relations; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Economics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11706989692687046,"score_gpt":0.3260965517070442,"score_spread":0.20902665478017374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969947428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13375449,0.0018202893,0.003203597,0.054228812,0.0009203413,0.00010921712,0.0000020144716,0.000051668005,0.8059096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806296,0.00023558672,0.016883831,0.00070047827,0.00042512346,0.000001755123,0.0000011936165,0.000009125988,0.0011132581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783844,0.0004906451,0.00050341676,0.00008543816,0.0008565516,0.00022549373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965566,0.00015994195,0.0004755543,0.00026204184,0.0023076641,0.00023823057],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008000126,0.00006707095,0.00015326322,0.0003290651,0.0006290847,0.01392862,0.0014265388,0.00018229175,0.0008889477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00956227,0.000059976024,0.00012293393,0.0004015508,0.000096404045,0.09886395,0.000097585114,0.0011271754,0.000013868247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000604884,0.0003788065,0.06612598,0.000009217013,0.00015309986,0.000024597819,0.17817506,0.0000025607508,0.00032295333,0.55569303,0.12832339,0.0707308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007870788,0.00008104174,0.041530177,0.000092462746,0.000063171756,0.00001586634,0.060558714,0.000016953305,0.000050052015,0.12857504,0.7680377,0.00019174932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010910034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016945254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84687513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014899918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004118841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970475751","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44.3.001","title":"A Three-Decade History of the Duration of Peer Review","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Duration (music); Variety (cybernetics); History; Library science; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Art; Literature; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.5442823854424196,"score_gpt":0.49369882529647185,"score_spread":0.050583560145947726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970475751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61518985,0.15626375,0.006094589,0.18644637,0.005480275,0.0008165257,0.000017975566,0.0000095731975,0.029681098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98497766,0.002094906,0.0035404917,0.0014562737,0.0002734649,0.0000035743344,6.603546e-7,0.000013967715,0.007638975],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9741402,0.00036978305,0.0021115465,0.00020742622,0.022917632,0.00025336968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90216583,0.003196306,0.0048668096,0.0009846168,0.08838559,0.00040083975],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09170985,0.000091439004,0.00043532107,0.017818809,0.0000783311,0.012726604,0.005046038,0.00013541483,0.0009505248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.44196722,0.000046803314,0.00037219233,0.05327814,0.0001433343,0.05901101,0.0005907869,0.0013478335,0.000021694832],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005335226,0.0000647203,0.08358614,0.000043821543,0.00001893233,0.0000013908389,0.00014412378,0.000003883353,0.005288256,0.00050910056,0.8450524,0.065281875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004895928,0.00017276744,0.6065431,0.0006470091,0.000030049698,0.000056909594,0.0002908213,0.00033603926,0.00065796217,0.01538314,0.3752751,0.000117491996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025789198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000112864445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52295697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003786218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010514976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970713455","doi":"10.1353/scp.2005.0004","title":"A History of Cambridge University Press. Volume Three: New Worlds for Learning, 1873-1972 (review)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Historical Education Studies Worldwide","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); History; Media studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.04964402879828256,"score_gpt":0.28911190509237156,"score_spread":0.239467876294089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970713455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065197297,0.35899127,0.010556796,0.2155884,0.006820294,0.00095727574,0.000014409315,0.00013248321,0.40041935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03196416,0.018023834,0.023831926,0.002885528,0.005114766,0.0000035553787,0.0000042229467,0.000047951282,0.9181241],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758035,0.00028280262,0.0006154616,0.00017540887,0.0010270103,0.00031894044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954351,0.00034686973,0.0013085015,0.00016017251,0.0023289446,0.00042036865],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047519985,0.00011769955,0.00041888288,0.00027387732,0.00036826037,0.00063635205,0.0009835581,0.00012507784,0.00016517805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015961047,0.00012343595,0.00028521311,0.0005188451,0.00015644249,0.023772486,0.00009253381,0.0012097259,0.000006850165],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027374219,0.00007081553,0.0037007695,0.000049682414,0.000050690458,0.000002118639,0.0034949973,0.000016905311,0.000014785461,0.0040313774,0.9648646,0.023675874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043031396,0.000058501995,0.0026869234,0.0002467216,0.000100372126,0.0000024966942,0.0011809403,0.000009413245,0.0000015058898,0.000017955348,0.99514663,0.00011821832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023378264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055217854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5177047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040737935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00294479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971156800","doi":"10.1353/scp.2011.0006","title":"Taking Clio's Pulse . . .: or, Examining Characteristics of Monographic Publications Reviewed by American Historical Review","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Salient; Subject (documents); Order (exchange); History; Sociology; Epistemology; Social science; Library science; Computer science; Archaeology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1769591987288524,"score_gpt":0.2853136412011451,"score_spread":0.1083544424722927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971156800","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2647981,0.37645057,0.0020086793,0.05276958,0.0063097673,0.001554722,0.0002707858,0.00051799364,0.2953198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9534668,0.03716171,0.004535882,0.0024024807,0.00072917057,0.000022988475,0.000065151246,0.000064723135,0.0015511344],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952426,0.00071338227,0.002334843,0.0002670762,0.0010650542,0.00037706256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98739463,0.0003945373,0.00616055,0.00086359214,0.0048472825,0.00033938856],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0088107595,0.0002678851,0.0009682373,0.0009186672,0.0005023331,0.014231174,0.0025287825,0.00012426822,0.0012307432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021048252,0.00021237422,0.00030052476,0.0009259513,0.00023343238,0.08182714,0.00023710755,0.002669159,0.0000048518887],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016617766,0.0010882672,0.051328104,0.0010797844,0.00046775767,0.000020544485,0.019787433,1.1058655e-7,0.0004846679,0.030695565,0.4119948,0.48288676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004155786,0.00050557614,0.03904364,0.0027827518,0.00031030117,0.000067164474,0.0015403657,0.0000059143763,0.000014958464,0.00037475454,0.9545657,0.00037331315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001129856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000086203065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68866867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031977682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029377782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971509762","doi":"10.1353/scp.2013.0007","title":"What Makes a Working Paper in Economics Publishable?: A Tale from the Scientific Periphery","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Institution; Publish or perish; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Production (economics); Publishing; Regional science; Library science; Social science; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.39111413594857386,"score_gpt":0.43648218703860087,"score_spread":0.045368051090027006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971509762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93776876,0.0083007375,0.0001548066,0.0444343,0.005641203,0.0002140611,0.000007429427,0.000008524836,0.003470163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99270016,0.0007763832,0.0018975069,0.0019398491,0.0007546027,0.000008490319,0.0000031426835,0.000020087482,0.0018998019],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98694736,0.00064490637,0.0019854142,0.0007222993,0.0088366335,0.0008633694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97072905,0.011181057,0.0019381596,0.0014862654,0.013768659,0.0008967768],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08270154,0.00020293557,0.000486189,0.030193117,0.0006682658,0.73616904,0.009130952,0.00027271925,0.001956732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14900234,0.000117397394,0.00031997918,0.08480976,0.0002768356,0.3849102,0.0014348964,0.0027482559,0.00015896949],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018747876,0.000116528354,0.40680015,0.0000012666145,0.00003171505,0.000023476325,0.0013368633,0.0001653336,0.0009102448,0.00045372255,0.11720199,0.47293997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009216503,0.00006974957,0.49783057,0.0001527946,0.000008147152,0.00005132537,0.021496594,0.002480779,0.000067017456,0.053704374,0.42295846,0.0002585515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059863686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037202451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4726814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041504248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086320436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972574992","doi":"10.1353/scp.2012.0025","title":"University Press Forum 2012: Looking Backward and Forward","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"American Sports and Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sample (material); Feature (linguistics); Media studies; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01767748342713467,"score_gpt":0.20139406998327367,"score_spread":0.18371658655613898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972574992","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49825245,0.018963283,0.0006801089,0.012418323,0.0042414046,0.00019583959,0.000077620934,0.00006970492,0.46510127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96990395,0.00012687771,0.0007365057,0.00092322513,0.0025106692,1.3363665e-7,0.0000031931656,0.000017508159,0.025777923],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894047,0.000050815244,0.00025548408,0.00008846019,0.0003640025,0.0003007881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985455,0.000053105497,0.00044378082,0.00010366395,0.00058717123,0.0002667429],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009981578,0.000112438574,0.00021270876,0.00018294035,0.0003334265,0.012618632,0.0002881444,0.00007825723,0.0005958348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016171619,0.00008867616,0.00009989045,0.00004692853,0.00010917759,0.113150515,0.00011220136,0.0009791937,0.0000015589513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010584547,0.00010714002,0.052468996,0.000040794326,0.00017173008,0.00005677394,0.04650324,0.0000024304807,0.000047217723,0.36802423,0.5148757,0.017595876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029877896,0.00005349259,0.003654274,0.00006640886,0.00004691496,0.000058974885,0.020165483,0.000002487592,0.0000047007356,0.00007924622,0.9754557,0.000113529706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008065764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014493523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4716515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052190084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004285237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98840636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973105210","doi":"10.3138/jsp.42.2.160","title":"Taking Clio's Pulse …","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Salient; Subject (documents); Order (exchange); Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Social science; Library science; Law; Computer science; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.08309073294390834,"score_gpt":0.3599320363468256,"score_spread":0.27684130340291724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973105210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5906481,0.00036537412,0.00017389914,0.03537721,0.0026154078,0.000055685174,0.0000012391735,0.000029916677,0.37073314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923519,0.000073420146,0.002046526,0.0017228926,0.0028015228,6.126604e-7,4.8524004e-7,0.000007269988,0.0009953734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974108,0.00091527385,0.00046566772,0.000120029654,0.0008124976,0.00027578013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99559927,0.0016124415,0.0011084051,0.00014303802,0.0012020764,0.0003347693],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.025013005,0.00008299708,0.00019322816,0.00016713563,0.00083833555,0.021466509,0.0010561253,0.00035151144,0.0019228635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.082432896,0.000067914436,0.00016592586,0.00042611168,0.00019295173,0.12074614,0.000081902894,0.004570521,0.000016845628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017635306,0.00020907051,0.06895454,0.00000687727,0.00008808836,0.0001795794,0.018159917,0.0000026964158,0.007577386,0.7296878,0.0078025954,0.16715509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031625282,0.00008716912,0.016175875,0.000026158048,0.000019907571,0.000043080785,0.0070778765,0.0000014438241,0.000051936946,0.06122481,0.9148481,0.00012738103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030715915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001381131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9070455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049611182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003990448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974605252","doi":"10.3138/jsp.42.3.271","title":"Freedom to Read vs. Obligation to Protect","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Politics; Order (exchange); Variety (cybernetics); Dissemination; Obligation; Freedom of the press; Freedom of information; Political science; Cohesion (chemistry); Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Public relations; Internet privacy; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.060641141712918734,"score_gpt":0.2947847531004837,"score_spread":0.23414361138756495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974605252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8430915,0.0001046005,0.0034653966,0.062151905,0.0014863244,0.00045264608,0.0000073167885,0.000054630123,0.08918571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.972752,0.00002161408,0.022185436,0.003352386,0.0010449366,0.0000044666144,0.0000010220408,0.0000136634435,0.0006245189],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975651,0.00022769147,0.0004578707,0.00015572774,0.0012320154,0.0003616278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968402,0.000052390682,0.00032345057,0.00016420311,0.001983932,0.00063584803],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061185095,0.000098643264,0.00019808912,0.00042402177,0.0003922136,0.012025039,0.0011023699,0.00019534155,0.00011071093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01182628,0.00009212906,0.00010721952,0.0009940732,0.00005707671,0.04419095,0.000119177574,0.0009486958,0.000052828247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006746767,0.00049400405,0.061482705,0.000040571333,0.00017638212,0.00020209982,0.37125015,0.0002375755,0.00309072,0.2660732,0.2105053,0.08577261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009569427,0.0012437726,0.1086932,0.0005129749,0.00006962644,0.000041687286,0.046685338,0.000040953793,0.00020303745,0.03440034,0.80651593,0.00063617877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007130894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042778472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5960106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031226463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036466154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994807},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W1974839435","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.3.274","title":"The Value of Knowledge Created by Individual Scientist and Research Groups","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Affect (linguistics); Value (mathematics); Publication; Knowledge management; Knowledge creation; Productivity; Citation; Sociology; Computer science; Library science; Political science; Business; Marketing; Advertising","score_opus":0.10222184887837311,"score_gpt":0.3621861743659434,"score_spread":0.2599643254875703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974839435","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8755912,0.007592418,0.00004509945,0.0034644012,0.0006092318,0.00012246851,0.0000032425407,0.000011970842,0.11255994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99380004,0.0006983849,0.00023497258,0.00002670849,0.00048227765,0.0000013414983,0.0000011333277,0.000009113436,0.0047460506],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99618113,0.00085051346,0.00049185473,0.00015409784,0.001896688,0.00042571884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959606,0.00088523846,0.00034138185,0.00014434218,0.0024340607,0.0002343844],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.029517788,0.0000791706,0.00018274476,0.0004937393,0.0032267587,0.016220504,0.001507552,0.00012228229,0.00002250844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011798106,0.00005778536,0.00007350832,0.0014570528,0.0009191476,0.027091244,0.00037401268,0.0013940709,0.000004271622],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069880945,0.0002824551,0.3337136,0.000040987634,0.00021796061,0.00004701332,0.094435595,0.0000019364443,0.00127249,0.1451764,0.393753,0.030988708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013674749,0.00022867572,0.20588508,0.00025632032,0.000057917827,0.000033172433,0.038240258,0.00005592249,0.00031242773,0.0074227494,0.74590987,0.00023015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003491463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002049682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35215688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012348536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038489752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975158846","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44.3.003","title":"Through Clio's Lens: Exploring Disciplinary, Intellectual, and Historical Orientations in the History of Photography","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Photography and Visual Culture","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Photography; Discipline; History of photography; Sociology; Visual arts; Visual culture; History; Art; Social science","score_opus":0.2623466247285046,"score_gpt":0.2748901549264497,"score_spread":0.012543530197945074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975158846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9721524,0.0065451753,0.000048758273,0.0030294678,0.0019808146,0.00016904835,0.0000040690925,0.000012336811,0.016057944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99780697,0.0004847455,0.00019733558,0.00059648615,0.00048492808,0.000020375623,0.0000018804985,0.000011093472,0.000396179],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998455,0.0001550545,0.0005963562,0.00012489724,0.0004897976,0.00017893605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838173,0.00037475443,0.00038927732,0.00012580337,0.00067855814,0.000049847527],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010372387,0.00012466278,0.00024408975,0.00046508925,0.00021368872,0.003595149,0.00045706853,0.00006706333,0.00029013562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008657714,0.00007918163,0.00017728157,0.0002450313,0.0001920296,0.05714309,0.00006393784,0.0012435335,0.0000015132226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004233971,0.00028440653,0.0039988174,0.000047556478,0.00006699888,0.000009881482,0.6608438,0.0000014443771,0.0010171096,0.030564837,0.30247667,0.0006461662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006321924,0.000501065,0.0053444766,0.00022583969,0.000060884755,0.000040571194,0.13631003,0.0000071588697,0.000059948932,0.007142012,0.8494846,0.00019121855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001438373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003254756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5470079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021712297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006926172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975195640","doi":"10.3138/jsp.42.2.205","title":"Truth or Hope?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Visibility; Publishing; Project commissioning; History; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.599150201540233,"score_gpt":0.5600144062844251,"score_spread":0.039135795255807904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975195640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9530039,0.0004108178,0.0023132574,0.014660595,0.006155688,0.000074200776,0.00001007115,0.000013308865,0.023358187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836229,0.000068028145,0.010942952,0.00055121636,0.0011654353,6.8221686e-7,4.0160268e-7,0.000013469901,0.0036349006],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9782469,0.00026910935,0.0015038035,0.00038302178,0.019028202,0.00056891725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9461165,0.012612008,0.0019839145,0.0011239091,0.036436763,0.0017269192],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11570161,0.00013315215,0.00039136442,0.06743133,0.00032856688,0.27771267,0.0077332957,0.0002904363,0.0022175629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.63688576,0.00007152335,0.0002707753,0.1286101,0.00011070477,0.14624892,0.0008279477,0.0044804597,0.00014241465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013800201,0.00021040175,0.19464226,0.0000035165344,0.000038328253,0.00026270532,0.00024369011,0.00000900976,0.012165803,0.006296622,0.23665029,0.54933935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013610094,0.00042348466,0.23864117,0.00002041159,0.000011986962,0.00075832265,0.0010792969,0.00032200915,0.0012952216,0.028615715,0.7272372,0.00023414602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026360267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002073286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5491052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008175284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009792314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99869454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975832437","doi":"10.1353/scp.2004.0001","title":"The Price of University Press Books, 1989-2000","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Art History and Market Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vitality; Government (linguistics); Test (biology); Economics; Management; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.025212939895263208,"score_gpt":0.18945022058915803,"score_spread":0.16423728069389482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975832437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055173725,0.0035913,0.0002191775,0.0016285863,0.001021411,0.00006173242,0.000008378083,0.000014153802,0.93828154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8496287,0.00032590912,0.00039523523,0.0002249844,0.00053337973,2.0178119e-7,8.6894687e-7,0.000014030251,0.14887673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986401,0.0003345544,0.0003505029,0.00007639854,0.00044610188,0.00015231686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976654,0.00029208526,0.00063971855,0.00016264507,0.0011447055,0.000095461255],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036855063,0.00007754434,0.00017686412,0.00015449578,0.0007891825,0.004693952,0.0005576355,0.000047443682,0.0002797175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016001818,0.00005435777,0.000190322,0.000069560745,0.00015724018,0.028295264,0.000044441902,0.00067397975,0.000001757411],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001829344,0.00010285479,0.000889727,0.000024643747,0.0003803182,0.000035442783,0.02158954,0.00002158042,0.00012929642,0.8104263,0.1627277,0.0034896869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023496614,0.000052290055,0.00016775346,0.000024768036,0.00008815131,0.000008964924,0.006982366,0.0000051069255,0.00004515182,0.0006722777,0.9916549,0.00006335332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000100602294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011539024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82892716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012660703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023062197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99633926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976755538","doi":"10.3138/jsp.36.4.221","title":"Herding Cats: The View from the Volume and Series Editor","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Herding; Publishing; Plague (disease); Volume (thermodynamics); Sociology; History; Library science; Social science; Political science; Law; Computer science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.36834079132810094,"score_gpt":0.4825268289956465,"score_spread":0.11418603766754554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976755538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61660606,0.030480098,0.0013427282,0.34306479,0.0061687473,0.00014370581,0.000026551439,0.0000110951405,0.002156243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9737337,0.001601854,0.0032460766,0.002971091,0.016688844,0.0000020505709,7.3660703e-7,0.00001462127,0.0017410152],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870357,0.00057628175,0.0010269821,0.00030002213,0.010651668,0.00040938304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810392,0.00837975,0.000982341,0.000651776,0.008506033,0.00044088953],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07506255,0.00012480674,0.00028721054,0.0075222063,0.0009200902,0.2350358,0.0054393015,0.0001372683,0.00031700914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1816296,0.000052438296,0.00015423668,0.042812586,0.00019728128,0.10896567,0.0010693881,0.002130181,0.000050904677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001565018,0.000023193257,0.11240533,9.71311e-7,0.000029718944,0.0000072503753,0.00077007763,0.000016606642,0.00024630307,0.00028115636,0.60025644,0.28594732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022781936,0.000059240825,0.13892668,0.000026490916,0.000010973346,0.000069505244,0.0033402233,0.00027784734,0.000047675207,0.0045476067,0.85239273,0.00007319054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016265025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053020358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35712767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001329816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002990528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977087914","doi":"10.3138/jsp.41.3.257","title":"The Future of Scholarly Journal Publishing among Social Science and Humanities Associations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Revenue; Sample (material); Scholarly communication; Business model; Political science; Library science; Public relations; Sociology; Business; Marketing; Computer science; Accounting; Law","score_opus":0.30117199054805116,"score_gpt":0.46586916195735545,"score_spread":0.1646971714093043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977087914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94724506,0.0027705927,0.00023066804,0.030354328,0.005557388,0.00011601701,0.000027869062,0.000010073249,0.013688005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99391496,0.00034857582,0.0015412507,0.0003850035,0.003242284,0.0000011343171,6.018816e-7,0.000016594746,0.0005496046],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9616854,0.00066638185,0.002360699,0.0004520857,0.033857998,0.0009774073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8279288,0.009416318,0.0064597,0.0008036368,0.15411317,0.0012783937],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2797821,0.00019937471,0.00050496677,0.04270197,0.0063700075,0.7135719,0.011393467,0.00044254956,0.000077085315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5361982,0.00011838125,0.00030516108,0.08452875,0.0015283164,0.4508684,0.0017280995,0.010552014,0.0000031408238],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030127436,0.00011435336,0.5556368,0.0000048633224,0.000079203055,0.00002562931,0.0027063524,0.0000019429788,0.009337912,0.049013775,0.085523866,0.29752517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069648295,0.00013788442,0.8197679,0.000020972831,0.000021556894,0.00019788518,0.012789281,0.00008215203,0.00025399914,0.036089532,0.12977278,0.00016955858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006258873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011006867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29735562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040209008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029519068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979303592","doi":"10.3138/jsp.32.2.102","title":"To Publish and Perish: Who Are the Dinosaurs in Scholarly Publishing?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scholarship; Publish or perish; Scholarly communication; Publication; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Law and economics; Law","score_opus":0.05742160793041447,"score_gpt":0.25302355513886193,"score_spread":0.19560194720844748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979303592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7224705,0.0049205003,0.00006151745,0.20590806,0.0016089575,0.00031079174,0.00002898319,0.00008566563,0.06460501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822537,0.0004691585,0.00052829005,0.010607058,0.0025135998,0.000020925045,0.000015062962,0.000069989685,0.003522222],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937556,0.000960388,0.0016545524,0.0005190982,0.0022575816,0.00085279293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894867,0.00081209256,0.0014563833,0.0010805993,0.006434957,0.00072926754],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017996078,0.0004190289,0.00072709593,0.002047196,0.0014916554,0.61840415,0.0052151075,0.0004096195,0.00021663649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045601245,0.0003106966,0.00024071339,0.0012051458,0.00026792078,0.59612274,0.0010234368,0.008794778,0.00001448351],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002871218,0.00040476208,0.44564864,0.00004906995,0.00020113008,0.00018496347,0.067304835,0.000054308388,0.00018098764,0.12316574,0.31717587,0.04534258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012970191,0.00018679317,0.16157766,0.0005968642,0.000047365418,0.00020639738,0.03625577,0.000049957962,0.0000067644,0.006727517,0.7926179,0.0004300133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016098655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033532488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47544202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043545762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003800735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979544726","doi":"10.1353/scp.2012.0006","title":"Art History Publishing and Segmentation: Exploratory Observations of an Ecology of Publishing","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Art History and Market Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Indigenous; Politics; The Renaissance; History; Sociology; Media studies; Classics; Social science; Anthropology; Political science; Art history; Ecology; Biology; Law","score_opus":0.09802801206486343,"score_gpt":0.2396279925461233,"score_spread":0.14159998048125988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979544726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94897175,0.0047608106,0.00018404884,0.0036187812,0.0030217103,0.00009366809,0.000029642535,0.000032417363,0.039287183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98946464,0.000079865116,0.004099594,0.0011035375,0.0019444927,0.000005573382,0.000047780886,0.000032003976,0.003222485],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969881,0.00043905055,0.0012518401,0.00017350998,0.0008319319,0.00031556294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99402344,0.00037007197,0.0020926488,0.00026783295,0.0029009993,0.00034499407],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076974696,0.0001782683,0.0005174316,0.0010282315,0.00035064758,0.009009352,0.0006963262,0.00019417623,0.0010076963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00489815,0.0001687774,0.00019254274,0.00018112385,0.00030902892,0.39307973,0.00016415193,0.001247722,0.0000017622175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022353293,0.0009896801,0.113386594,0.00032688395,0.0008370359,0.000019264515,0.24436362,0.000045463872,0.007346744,0.16498572,0.44808608,0.01938938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010371736,0.00030571248,0.021510324,0.00013649523,0.0003686028,0.000038057307,0.049519703,0.000054918848,0.00013811079,0.0011989903,0.9253973,0.00029462363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011696143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051756576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47731122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038753022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036274418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979570114","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0077","title":"Publishing as a Vocation: The Necessity of Independent Scholarly Media","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Context (archaeology); Ideology; Politics; Sociology; Quality (philosophy); Service (business); Public relations; Media studies; Social science; Epistemology; Law; Political science; History; Philosophy; Marketing; Business","score_opus":0.3844269601575179,"score_gpt":0.4915914338750796,"score_spread":0.10716447371756166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979570114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92015314,0.0014161449,0.0020321743,0.05699825,0.004447987,0.00016560973,0.000019269344,0.000014276628,0.014753139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99398273,0.00010579955,0.003191054,0.0010086008,0.0012398094,0.0000024029991,0.000002322483,0.000018523084,0.00044877644],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95872575,0.0010674237,0.0029036838,0.00064744195,0.035855662,0.0008000128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8413774,0.028101519,0.008089621,0.0032194986,0.11668246,0.0025295212],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.21261483,0.00022697628,0.00059452414,0.041537084,0.00075783994,0.4530089,0.016190736,0.00059568015,0.00086708704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7161921,0.00012866216,0.0004425591,0.10595567,0.00032038093,0.37798348,0.0021000146,0.010214766,0.00006177753],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107588785,0.0003592859,0.56648666,0.000010819681,0.000103154445,0.00007333895,0.0024687534,0.000022253766,0.02153797,0.018976126,0.07760638,0.31224766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014515658,0.00023147915,0.8081962,0.000060711493,0.00003499417,0.0004597767,0.0055543757,0.00021554477,0.0031889034,0.08723623,0.09309689,0.00027334908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043959534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017027916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5035773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017562811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021435402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9920687},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W1980444706","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0083","title":"What Competencies Do Today’s Academic Authors Need?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Innovations in Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.030721331364393933,"score_gpt":0.3294878327528261,"score_spread":0.2987665013884322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980444706","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8540496,0.0007996838,0.00027668418,0.13135138,0.0112554915,0.000107637796,6.384418e-7,0.00003015924,0.0021287133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9563114,0.00023159503,0.029574286,0.008223556,0.004549638,0.0000032605187,0.000009197975,0.00003068492,0.0010663962],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968657,0.00006702669,0.0009966632,0.0001642299,0.0016032214,0.0003031504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945478,0.00014205488,0.000773411,0.0003267085,0.0038990157,0.00031100804],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007554216,0.00014148453,0.0003255957,0.00091581687,0.00019296481,0.0117414445,0.00066669175,0.00056328985,0.0004050415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034022294,0.00011254062,0.00012662802,0.0010652007,0.00013168165,0.085462615,0.00009203937,0.011064058,0.000021211565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014936217,0.00032249757,0.13699643,0.00012689868,0.00019815323,0.00010344512,0.007683389,0.0000064791348,0.13349898,0.029834466,0.38150305,0.30957684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026479058,0.00040114627,0.21310484,0.0017122906,0.0002415662,0.0035953,0.029763974,0.00015855745,0.002403333,0.01042723,0.7351774,0.0003664563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010607264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020003276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35367435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018106675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007642761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99121743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980987091","doi":"10.3138/jsp.43.4.347","title":"Giving It Away: Sharing and the Future of Scholarly Communication","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Generosity; Scholarship; Scholarly communication; Publishing; Openness to experience; Focus (optics); Public relations; Obstacle; Sociology; Business; Marketing; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04590017760953421,"score_gpt":0.25152674917222634,"score_spread":0.20562657156269212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980987091","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76274496,0.072669834,0.00014728829,0.096592665,0.0019390598,0.00025297585,0.000014775321,0.000056293473,0.065582134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99290544,0.0013128959,0.0013430804,0.0011999492,0.002212958,0.000004855653,0.000008461853,0.000029792041,0.0009825627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99654984,0.000761574,0.0011351085,0.00014473642,0.0010502592,0.00035846452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935006,0.0006799689,0.0016830111,0.00091367034,0.0029905604,0.00023221242],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021512091,0.00019719753,0.00043516385,0.00048588027,0.0012439635,0.10361076,0.0028332574,0.00019935667,0.00013779657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058486145,0.00013423288,0.00020502525,0.000226085,0.0003747396,0.3339757,0.00077375,0.004315958,0.000003861816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014891278,0.00015877264,0.055701602,0.00006882875,0.00022973452,0.0000011060837,0.106867984,0.000005771529,0.00022645258,0.80185485,0.017467942,0.017268015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029069781,0.00009033408,0.023207905,0.00063416746,0.00019004429,0.00012819839,0.06568646,0.00015346809,0.00004714803,0.020697493,0.88591456,0.00034326507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033954091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016213141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8684466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011989705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011753786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99798113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981378640","doi":"10.3138/jsp.32.4.179","title":"The Twentieth-Century Erasmus","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Erasmus+; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; History; Art history; The Renaissance","score_opus":0.05153218021007832,"score_gpt":0.2918009958995939,"score_spread":0.24026881568951558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981378640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43868437,0.011684324,0.00009743069,0.40778282,0.007872033,0.0001909423,0.0000014854422,0.00004670348,0.1336399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8886614,0.014285362,0.0008886455,0.0025136715,0.0055997367,0.0000030928502,0.0000017708535,0.000021378673,0.08802493],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976606,0.00020189631,0.00045512748,0.000088779794,0.0012320327,0.0003615946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974965,0.00021707748,0.00045451656,0.00010652472,0.0014672454,0.00025813555],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005735526,0.00008071928,0.00012613057,0.000082853294,0.001664384,0.04129382,0.0009813999,0.00015702167,0.00024215099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052674417,0.000048920945,0.000119242846,0.0005794027,0.00011888077,0.038888548,0.000089050394,0.0014057035,0.000009977841],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032118576,0.000028724171,0.024463467,0.0000010474442,0.00005624062,0.000052362917,0.005213955,0.0000033127865,0.00006515756,0.0067627635,0.78552586,0.17779498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022314244,0.000020985013,0.009477857,0.000031915322,0.000009913489,0.000033026976,0.018930793,8.327432e-7,0.000007503902,0.0011929692,0.9699986,0.00007246862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055846735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004469368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44997704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030142532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046859615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982091064","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0042","title":"Professional Editors at Scholarly Journals","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Writing and Publishing","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Library science; Business; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Publishing; Law","score_opus":0.051215016859931774,"score_gpt":0.28065464194806994,"score_spread":0.22943962508813817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982091064","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.614857,0.008029292,0.00009482818,0.19522317,0.028364222,0.0002015576,0.000042338757,0.00017261539,0.15301496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88915884,0.000103177204,0.00090842845,0.008538648,0.085721,0.0000015843298,0.000010771539,0.000044916724,0.015512624],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99440956,0.00034474488,0.0015563875,0.00028313833,0.0027502102,0.0006559469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918658,0.0003928235,0.0018549515,0.00026153325,0.005002181,0.0006227143],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011004845,0.00029902867,0.0005206904,0.0010020952,0.0015740372,0.121241815,0.0018714719,0.00044408688,0.0018133799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012654247,0.00023164434,0.00037490096,0.00026094198,0.00012170666,0.29395282,0.0002078937,0.007511128,0.000047213645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009467836,0.00013252921,0.0048505394,0.000016367574,0.000069737136,0.00008473727,0.013070082,0.000010731257,0.0015449413,0.024712564,0.94194806,0.013465023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009783375,0.00023653559,0.008114045,0.00073949044,0.000059685575,0.00036636487,0.006130039,0.000011824298,0.00011387799,0.013633612,0.9692844,0.00033178547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000305676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011215208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27430183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039678463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044251946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982974229","doi":"10.1353/scp.2012.0018","title":"The Handbook of Scholarly Writing and Publishing (review)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Publishing; Scholarly communication; Sociology; Scholarship; Media studies; Library science; Psychology; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.062284621695408694,"score_gpt":0.2618658152733731,"score_spread":0.19958119357796442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982974229","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11302232,0.7656922,0.00019167493,0.05527054,0.002513384,0.00031803068,0.000027749022,0.00007402032,0.06289008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95817935,0.031421915,0.0022383425,0.0034462444,0.0034098735,0.000010200085,0.000015129042,0.000060550927,0.0012183709],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947881,0.00083954097,0.0017888951,0.00019254776,0.0017531565,0.00063772744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98890305,0.0015372551,0.002380314,0.0007062691,0.00600156,0.00047157917],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.030965246,0.0002609095,0.0005412886,0.00048849353,0.0017234255,0.21340486,0.0026667488,0.00021541733,0.0001004677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035176393,0.00018032352,0.00026262435,0.00029423577,0.00032358803,0.5184707,0.00060780195,0.005110614,0.0000053471595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010073491,0.0003312021,0.051765416,0.0006382951,0.0005074957,0.000008637162,0.031093134,0.0000019656072,0.001539778,0.30227405,0.3888105,0.2229288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008752049,0.00013424612,0.009726251,0.004130107,0.00018739256,0.00016886058,0.009144384,0.000015240643,0.00012495837,0.003989949,0.97117513,0.00032828766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019454732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006488424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.845157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014738868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025768034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983051550","doi":"10.3138/jsp.43.1.52","title":"The Scholarly Book Review in the Humanities","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Wikis in Education and Collaboration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Digital humanities; Humanities; Sociology; Library science; History; Media studies; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.0964856359372373,"score_gpt":0.33092042380085396,"score_spread":0.23443478786361666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983051550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011624562,0.29072246,0.000039757462,0.25461045,0.002684856,0.0004374878,0.0000013265073,0.000022265684,0.43985683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48443744,0.18265225,0.0016643162,0.29430392,0.006928994,0.00007574812,0.0000034705242,0.000049021397,0.029884858],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967217,0.0012018587,0.00054639915,0.00007921108,0.0012355427,0.00021531021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964788,0.00036009375,0.0005688523,0.00020487106,0.0023301041,0.00005728332],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021399776,0.000069693466,0.00012225175,0.00014089857,0.0015626705,0.050767355,0.0017022021,0.00008709106,0.000278822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015547276,0.00003991849,0.00007689657,0.00079085905,0.00018434391,0.11019517,0.000035282927,0.0014979762,0.000012344698],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012497669,0.000079209916,0.003914613,0.000020781572,0.000017734614,0.000007956175,0.085870676,1.6256485e-7,0.000007779416,0.2043581,0.6933348,0.012375687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093778355,0.000028042263,0.010228175,0.00027756303,0.000014551289,0.000006908002,0.045767613,1.4605874e-7,0.0000032449507,0.0051761144,0.93835336,0.000050477043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037186407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009174287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47281286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017419514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010682079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985386730","doi":"10.1353/scp.2008.0003","title":"A Field Guide for Science Writers (review)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Environmental, Ecological, and Cultural Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Context (archaeology); Field (mathematics); Relevance (law); Newspaper; Sociology; Media studies; History; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07019267784805411,"score_gpt":0.325980886673301,"score_spread":0.2557882088252469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985386730","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6112966,0.05786798,0.00042816516,0.18430428,0.0020081098,0.00069181423,0.0000060314946,0.00005343205,0.14334361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85475624,0.09545174,0.013754005,0.027788745,0.001745208,0.000019967869,0.0000011046066,0.000012997619,0.0064699966],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980198,0.00007667876,0.00042942917,0.00014406015,0.0009998623,0.00033015225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998334,0.00027771882,0.00037719228,0.00008354128,0.00071220554,0.00021538055],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00539287,0.00007915207,0.0002176786,0.00008500082,0.0019261802,0.0027408034,0.0009508401,0.000079305944,0.00013349393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017377462,0.00005671665,0.00015951254,0.00040206726,0.0004340001,0.034823526,0.000103567414,0.00047824148,0.000005069043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026919468,0.00011090938,0.039225083,0.000045074383,0.000046493533,0.0000392644,0.006192814,0.000002387824,0.0019898298,0.0032039264,0.9310943,0.018022984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003329182,0.00026858054,0.02926647,0.0002346783,0.000028551145,0.00004398752,0.006555585,7.5721266e-7,0.00013742344,0.0007429965,0.96225274,0.00013530604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010680476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007004695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24345967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002689592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022701411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986088175","doi":"10.3138/jsp.46.3.02","title":"Lester J. Cappon and the Publishing of Modern Documentary Editions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Digital and Traditional Archives Management","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Documentary evidence; Field (mathematics); History; Work (physics); Sociology; Media studies; Art history; Art; Literature; Archaeology; Engineering","score_opus":0.05798821251322105,"score_gpt":0.2198183118357768,"score_spread":0.16183009932255574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986088175","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21371031,0.0012024022,0.00064378715,0.093725994,0.0017661664,0.00019524258,0.00010334908,0.000022770757,0.68863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994746,0.000026688318,0.00029858123,0.0016945299,0.0015144177,0.000002886936,0.000017541202,0.000010229169,0.0016891044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998367,0.00009672983,0.00049398944,0.00009779658,0.0007983408,0.00014610878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825597,0.00021732933,0.00045584523,0.00011438464,0.000795267,0.0001612096],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002133154,0.00009929051,0.00020125891,0.0002541311,0.0002053877,0.04188246,0.0005077741,0.000020519681,0.0000427884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007324981,0.000060388687,0.00011353668,0.00005610162,0.00031855298,0.13138095,0.00019409017,0.00068633363,0.00000213752],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011569942,0.00008840951,0.00024152866,0.000023861032,0.00015321969,0.000012917466,0.015917638,0.000038455917,0.0000053967137,0.8785531,0.08692673,0.017923072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025404477,0.00014901302,0.003351159,0.0001685881,0.00009881663,0.00007044044,0.0077828104,0.00013144885,0.0000064768365,0.7526756,0.23289807,0.00012712971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016243267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044709966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7810357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003651831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008052023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95911217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986361915","doi":"10.1353/scp.2004.0003","title":"The Journal of Scholarly Publishing : Continuing and Enhancing the Tradition","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Field (mathematics); Library science; Scholarly communication; Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.038130722936544056,"score_gpt":0.22832716327921168,"score_spread":0.19019644034266764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986361915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8852286,0.02871737,0.0012646539,0.047191102,0.004354385,0.00023469092,0.0000124254075,0.0000418487,0.03295493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99466145,0.00095567276,0.00085529394,0.0009201363,0.0019526116,0.0000023259922,0.0000029787955,0.000041771378,0.0006077468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927294,0.0022666897,0.0021746904,0.00018928443,0.0021227521,0.0005171675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98240453,0.0031778526,0.0037942913,0.0006490754,0.009614371,0.00035988673],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0524162,0.00028266996,0.0004855106,0.0006611883,0.0028223144,0.43017176,0.0031219842,0.00025288988,0.000059537302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06566182,0.00016623815,0.0002898262,0.00038486192,0.0003663375,0.45461008,0.00020475381,0.00837624,0.0000021021278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002835354,0.0002515645,0.005718597,0.000067827415,0.0006918132,0.000047761587,0.15706784,0.00004853949,0.0070879264,0.6669476,0.07482251,0.08696449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021365476,0.0004461466,0.005698586,0.0008971944,0.00030652457,0.0012855588,0.111891106,0.000044108365,0.00061925343,0.040036406,0.8362311,0.00040744175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013799148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030855002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7614086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025864638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054249435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99847585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986681902","doi":"10.3138/jsp.45.2.001","title":"Books as Capital Assets","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Art History and Market Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Investment (military); Depreciation (economics); Gross private domestic investment; Production (economics); Economics; National accounts; Order (exchange); Inflation (cosmology); Fixed asset; Fixed investment; Book value; Capital (architecture); Economy; Monetary economics; Capital formation; Finance; Macroeconomics; Geography; Return on investment; Market economy; Financial capital; Political science; Human capital; Open-ended investment company; Earnings","score_opus":0.02336441145680222,"score_gpt":0.20843618155624488,"score_spread":0.18507177009944267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986681902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.613895,0.00080134824,0.000040076473,0.0053426553,0.0011966929,0.00005584718,0.0000023842108,0.000025692336,0.37864032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95339113,0.000017120623,0.00030449836,0.0013186169,0.00188486,0.0000023301895,0.0000025158934,0.000016878477,0.043062046],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840915,0.00010151875,0.0005215272,0.00011332931,0.0006339427,0.00022053855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99728227,0.00009675787,0.000514212,0.00015605667,0.0017223344,0.00022837063],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014564978,0.00012147595,0.0002455194,0.00040151816,0.00048460343,0.03213268,0.0005436821,0.000077895435,0.010509726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001314467,0.000095674426,0.00024998398,0.000049400984,0.00009817591,0.112659335,0.000076773234,0.0010868367,0.00030912997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031461735,0.00012758035,0.0026678036,0.000020684305,0.0003801298,0.00009036212,0.040364295,0.0000035831627,0.0007972822,0.15352473,0.7784102,0.023581896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032586863,0.00016265127,0.0011599507,0.000044857872,0.00008822286,0.00005930963,0.0092906775,0.000010873358,0.000032105425,0.016537966,0.97211957,0.0001679658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053932343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017620578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33949614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000101867205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001294417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99039483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988763595","doi":"10.1353/scp.2006.0006","title":"A Cooperative Publishing Model for Sustainable Scholarship","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scholarship; Business model; German; Diversity (politics); Business; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Knowledge management; Management; Marketing; Economics; Computer science; History; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.041120920773687945,"score_gpt":0.2466064629229217,"score_spread":0.20548554214923376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988763595","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6180941,0.0010534856,0.20040712,0.06325846,0.0014137696,0.0009423716,0.00001014228,0.00022590082,0.114594676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845847,0.0000032746148,0.004776119,0.00406723,0.004550892,0.000014623498,0.000058085567,0.00004909829,0.0018959787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972555,0.00002426117,0.0010053503,0.00026542784,0.0008753263,0.0005741553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9808565,0.00010345991,0.0014121094,0.00019821401,0.01739923,0.00003048586],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069461074,0.00024059307,0.00035236703,0.0012717444,0.000742381,0.17872396,0.0009896668,0.00033016028,0.0000365742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011631016,0.00021367529,0.00016873039,0.0019181672,0.000046442598,0.56142026,0.00019234177,0.0017130281,0.0000061003775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019712451,0.00015460262,0.010144598,0.00022459429,0.000045925717,0.00003350216,0.000049851467,0.013178363,0.0014237382,0.865208,0.107497275,0.0018423996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0070763384,0.00009248195,0.033005994,0.00053914957,0.0002671542,0.00007306709,0.003143775,0.11945373,0.00041117705,0.59427196,0.24051853,0.0011466295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003256036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000596475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3826963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019991201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037497384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99669445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989152391","doi":"10.1353/scp.2004.0030","title":"Why Copy Editors Matter","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Process (computing); Library science; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Programming language","score_opus":0.3940466698594513,"score_gpt":0.506418899806929,"score_spread":0.1123722299474777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989152391","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7399759,0.0018673557,0.027447408,0.18768564,0.017886538,0.00015140594,0.0000166052,0.00002106909,0.024948038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9728379,0.00007627319,0.010628991,0.008525103,0.0068572685,0.0000011294982,9.2183836e-7,0.00002264645,0.0010497492],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9772671,0.00023577722,0.0014351124,0.0003737762,0.020107837,0.00058040174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97560656,0.0021563761,0.0011511658,0.0005655471,0.019593665,0.00092668046],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06278511,0.00014264676,0.00037692513,0.06294875,0.00031232226,0.22701459,0.0059720613,0.00024287544,0.0012071467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16287848,0.00009163632,0.00030958926,0.10457364,0.00009981791,0.1487791,0.0007029858,0.0023027037,0.00043617416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001872205,0.00008861729,0.16330764,0.0000018309736,0.000018459175,0.00006997185,0.00013223875,0.00012049767,0.0008719123,0.0003853515,0.8261366,0.008848165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013742992,0.00025991496,0.11503638,0.00004693572,0.000009755914,0.00025290347,0.00078026886,0.000019754501,0.0012546807,0.050061323,0.83071107,0.00019273725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000117085925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000048647817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23286197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037604923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060946064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989379933","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0011","title":"Peer-Review Practice and Research for Academic Journals in China","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Publishing; Peer review; Internationalization; Function (biology); Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Business; Law","score_opus":0.8279242085320313,"score_gpt":0.6662651312879123,"score_spread":0.161659077244119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989379933","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2699977,0.1962802,0.0017188931,0.52436215,0.0007604956,0.00049497135,0.000015372108,0.000005700366,0.0063645327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79511714,0.17105702,0.020031953,0.004182219,0.0013785835,0.000015637059,0.000001803535,0.00003797749,0.0081776455],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93852496,0.0025671704,0.0032985369,0.00067155884,0.053747125,0.0011906603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7391637,0.055198006,0.003516924,0.0009978546,0.19895501,0.0021685248],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.52565306,0.00014143737,0.0006261439,0.07942668,0.0006744935,0.06170676,0.004984965,0.00032127413,0.00011003857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.91775274,0.000094515955,0.00020577176,0.13212532,0.00019543666,0.14717522,0.00094116887,0.007937505,0.000015508258],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009224216,0.0001256871,0.0781688,0.000042058495,0.000022074819,0.0002451479,0.0007390864,0.0000072099515,0.0004197471,0.0005883337,0.75155413,0.16799548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011091044,0.00035033637,0.20734921,0.0005675555,0.000010340367,0.0028863966,0.0011337817,0.0001572004,0.000054384567,0.017463572,0.7687802,0.00013796805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000726848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000037335158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5251195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003167992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012653302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990022978","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0004","title":"How to Write for a General Audience: A Guide for Academics Who Want to Share Their Knowledge with the World and Have Fun Doing It (review)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Salary; Sociology; Audience measurement; Media studies; Public relations; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1028960041177675,"score_gpt":0.2982332853683549,"score_spread":0.1953372812505874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990022978","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13929352,0.055962007,0.00787131,0.77269065,0.0008352291,0.0025997716,0.00035604826,0.0000844449,0.020306999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5876837,0.009658165,0.10361214,0.11458491,0.015534551,0.00095362816,0.000120795514,0.00034084808,0.16751131],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978319,0.0001771746,0.0006795073,0.00029346714,0.00054964965,0.0004683035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937601,0.0007559898,0.0006404301,0.0004345956,0.0040359143,0.00037294833],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006031627,0.00026224495,0.0004897006,0.00048322495,0.0018076557,0.035348322,0.0018357422,0.000101132115,0.000015200788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004699795,0.00015583335,0.00019722925,0.00026467815,0.0001024587,0.049565144,0.00033212986,0.0017974701,0.0000010895378],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011610355,0.000039649436,0.00042812395,0.00015373272,0.00010612172,0.0000030653475,0.04510351,0.000014460313,0.0001972328,0.011261759,0.92258316,0.019993082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000634885,0.00031636935,0.0006966082,0.0017796711,0.00006802881,0.00008270476,0.0071957656,0.00012676597,0.000032649357,0.00034515202,0.9884765,0.0002448824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033475448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015538702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65810573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001738637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028253093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990193931","doi":"10.1353/scp.2007.0001","title":"Measures to Shorten Publication Lags for Journals in China","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Time lag; Publishing; China; Competition (biology); Quality (philosophy); Lag; Value (mathematics); Key (lock); Lag time; Computer science; Advertising; Business; Political science; Law; Computer security","score_opus":0.06629847249947945,"score_gpt":0.27678019603522735,"score_spread":0.2104817235357479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990193931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63110054,0.004980357,0.0050462754,0.22205597,0.0025432403,0.0008083169,0.000082252925,0.00012757615,0.13325545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99011904,0.000030598556,0.0035229542,0.0013088961,0.002676033,0.000022669012,0.00003350316,0.000036215755,0.0022500705],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99658835,0.00027478047,0.0013984158,0.00021287783,0.0011159178,0.00040965303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992829,0.00025540323,0.00095713005,0.00040449938,0.0053244676,0.0002294936],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012958595,0.00018596362,0.00037958188,0.0017993831,0.0005253024,0.12226783,0.0018586515,0.000168656,0.00013339843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0112843085,0.00016077943,0.00021592739,0.0004211482,0.000045616416,0.15041594,0.00012534366,0.0018879399,0.000007589899],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024016891,0.0006209328,0.034070227,0.000040772225,0.00011610827,0.000012352547,0.022329617,0.000414043,0.003122021,0.25677067,0.6182881,0.06397501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001176577,0.00018863055,0.08683749,0.0002529613,0.000038888287,0.00004021413,0.0020526855,0.000089126086,0.00010050418,0.03116485,0.8777629,0.0002951897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089278736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016090553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3590185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031527466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025555943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991238164","doi":"10.1353/scp.2007.0019","title":"On the Innovative Spirits of Academic Journal Editors","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pace; Competition (biology); Selection (genetic algorithm); Process (computing); Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Knowledge management; Management; Engineering; Philosophy; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06623520531161456,"score_gpt":0.28284473283691675,"score_spread":0.2166095275253022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991238164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8657106,0.0012164947,0.0004139169,0.048258416,0.008442377,0.00011291846,0.0000107108135,0.00002440354,0.07581017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98505014,0.00006262742,0.00031974787,0.001911846,0.011995102,6.472509e-7,0.0000025488494,0.00002391445,0.0006333987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99578834,0.0003982176,0.001546157,0.000119209144,0.0017909119,0.00035718214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864659,0.0017570578,0.0026886857,0.0003756461,0.008510222,0.00020249766],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.028291054,0.00017982276,0.00032231733,0.0010354463,0.0009042045,0.035149094,0.0027189914,0.00023324469,0.00023635164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027221838,0.0001117943,0.00019040398,0.000533479,0.00025177552,0.10681121,0.0001804736,0.009706179,0.00000759173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017678514,0.00014825322,0.0030979258,0.000012803938,0.00019336266,0.000021802687,0.029741185,0.000017070292,0.0014030039,0.5296534,0.42143047,0.014103975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012088665,0.00069212937,0.01253787,0.0008275167,0.00006198963,0.00020728259,0.026343098,0.000011591675,0.0011110066,0.061896708,0.89478797,0.00031399558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044953842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022659919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47335747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020900411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039377186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99257845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991331343","doi":"10.1353/scp.2011.0035","title":"Sustaining Scholarly Publishing: New Business Models for University Presses: A Report of the AAUP Task Force on Economic Models for Scholarly Publishing","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Task force; Task (project management); Management; Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Business; Economics; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.11537134471487905,"score_gpt":0.24202256379617076,"score_spread":0.12665121908129173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991331343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2539232,0.0061818887,0.24636315,0.1290752,0.015059513,0.0062841764,0.0018341446,0.0007732952,0.34050545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9692366,0.00014256807,0.016946191,0.0014360137,0.0027888375,0.000029923658,0.00020494848,0.000206256,0.009008646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922748,0.0007238321,0.0027243309,0.0009701059,0.0021326551,0.0011742826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9669677,0.0015542887,0.0059995423,0.0022701812,0.02239669,0.00081162085],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020461278,0.0007088157,0.0011831356,0.001985607,0.0026449563,0.36134365,0.010136879,0.00094243727,0.00008029153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043544725,0.0006071011,0.0010450364,0.0008037753,0.000319946,0.77911466,0.0011585478,0.0066932477,0.0000020377684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017380845,0.00057429576,0.001586951,0.00031514146,0.00093075365,0.00004018253,0.044154435,0.006664316,0.00052781595,0.7966098,0.13831401,0.0085441945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010060067,0.00094130303,0.0021813083,0.0021873375,0.0009123399,0.00031294543,0.03824433,0.007366336,0.00041424585,0.46429923,0.47143131,0.0016492421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004666248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008763116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71531343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001326683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004195931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991395929","doi":"10.3138/jsp.33.3.173","title":"Personalities in Publishing: Gervase Muller","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multinational corporation; Publishing; Politics; Newspaper; Distribution (mathematics); Work (physics); Media studies; Economic history; Sociology; History; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.12904512763452097,"score_gpt":0.24109355942512134,"score_spread":0.11204843179060037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991395929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5541517,0.009772197,0.000035291312,0.10006083,0.0024578369,0.00015589435,0.000032380765,0.00010913817,0.3332247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98440194,0.00023133741,0.0007785395,0.0028106263,0.0021258858,0.0000057882567,0.0000137367215,0.0000425083,0.009589647],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957626,0.00056220137,0.0013093831,0.00026093898,0.0015720752,0.0005328422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99466866,0.000542267,0.0010072892,0.000554142,0.002898651,0.00032896508],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008407276,0.00025753013,0.00046218472,0.0014897952,0.00056659745,0.2486619,0.0026573185,0.00026849943,0.0027819201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014942635,0.00022629804,0.00027995053,0.0003906872,0.00017822995,0.41010386,0.0002759613,0.0051835957,0.000042119234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006914002,0.00065597496,0.02144434,0.00006012449,0.00015666468,0.00016136639,0.16523336,0.00003958995,0.0001284574,0.21093261,0.57313955,0.027978858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017462231,0.0001391873,0.0051920046,0.00031855205,0.000034761397,0.000115397255,0.027027344,0.0004061442,0.000011834113,0.007553794,0.9570762,0.00037858004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084088475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000610962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4302502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035009935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001352508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99812967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991471812","doi":"10.3138/jsp.32.3.123","title":"Mis/Adventures in Mis/Quoting","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Technology in Education and Healthcare","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adventure; History; Computer science; Art history","score_opus":0.058291399111752885,"score_gpt":0.3780859530438635,"score_spread":0.3197945539321106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991471812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75659275,0.0019412861,0.000028892522,0.19585279,0.0012891591,0.00006863157,5.557658e-7,0.000038021448,0.04418792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943069,0.00024820646,0.0017096043,0.0019180634,0.0010039626,0.0000013392282,5.8070844e-7,0.0000082008555,0.0008031175],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980553,0.00025347085,0.00053535355,0.00011645147,0.0006854498,0.00035401437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810576,0.0001708661,0.00047869136,0.00011570664,0.00090991816,0.00021906107],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055096424,0.00007243009,0.000173418,0.00064729725,0.00040888146,0.0060475576,0.00082248444,0.00033054224,0.00019069435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0110679995,0.000069457215,0.000075591815,0.0009080555,0.000085889114,0.027748877,0.000018089586,0.0021059436,0.000007297101],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021962522,0.00013768979,0.8440879,0.000012059026,0.000016874235,0.00009917681,0.041856628,0.000012686786,0.00020762123,0.031539444,0.019372305,0.06263563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050944416,0.000046034886,0.21216038,0.0001950805,0.0000080306745,0.00007382379,0.15110946,0.0000038798194,0.000023897408,0.0077255103,0.6280171,0.00012732328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018317335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026575695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63192755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037618616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069549016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992000912","doi":"10.3138/jsp.42.4.514","title":"Subject and Historiographic Characteristics of Library History","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library history; Subject (documents); Reading (process); Intellectual history; Discipline; Library science; Publishing; Cultural history; Association (psychology); Field (mathematics); State (computer science); History; Sociology; Social science; Anthropology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Psychology; Economic history","score_opus":0.06378126942005848,"score_gpt":0.24010765312249563,"score_spread":0.17632638370243714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992000912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9340682,0.0017551702,0.00003452453,0.0022951309,0.0013501663,0.00004702712,0.0000029411792,0.000018490531,0.060428366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957333,0.00048202762,0.0020949943,0.0003503624,0.00043450476,2.8214632e-7,0.0000010257518,0.0000063180873,0.0008971427],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859416,0.00016100444,0.00042725354,0.000093650546,0.00057351205,0.0001504353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986203,0.00007930117,0.00070578,0.000087377644,0.0002873349,0.00021994596],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021391455,0.00006241087,0.00016431682,0.00040518044,0.0001499462,0.0023223136,0.0005379478,0.000115785835,0.00026879288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012132026,0.00005592555,0.00007747777,0.00036311522,0.00025753837,0.1394243,0.000043742693,0.00047893653,7.329855e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006250397,0.00010588979,0.86837834,0.000023352475,0.000026358364,0.000043253298,0.043184288,2.0686093e-8,0.0011452909,0.052307792,0.02107403,0.013648909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024009742,0.0002650888,0.5903437,0.00008878595,0.0000277999,0.000017660903,0.004639369,0.0000011725967,0.00021149566,0.0056639197,0.39836365,0.00013726504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021935506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014969015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37728962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006197646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009246185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992107887","doi":"10.3138/jsp.46.3.01","title":"Open-Access Monograph Publishing and the Origins of the Office of Digital Scholarly Publishing at Penn State University","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Library science; State (computer science); Scholarly communication; Electronic publishing; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; World Wide Web; Computer science; Law; The Internet","score_opus":0.1106440128889495,"score_gpt":0.27417684653407975,"score_spread":0.16353283364513027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992107887","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8729654,0.002259033,0.00008377636,0.039892044,0.0014063932,0.00043299282,0.00022814442,0.000041676918,0.08269052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996439,0.00018288211,0.00033104894,0.0006378139,0.00040165748,0.000002022481,0.00002787941,0.000043241824,0.0019344527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99357957,0.0014055878,0.0015842413,0.00040171732,0.0025135137,0.0005153687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98131615,0.0013249576,0.004158685,0.0013149722,0.01136702,0.0005182338],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021139225,0.00034873732,0.0008009984,0.0010047378,0.0015388776,0.5736326,0.016354408,0.00027240562,0.00005254028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034753896,0.00022502824,0.00039506945,0.0012313725,0.0010859964,0.75862277,0.008429745,0.0051789354,0.0000017640708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028413967,0.00059006736,0.17312106,0.00015294756,0.0010255058,0.000028418295,0.08368664,0.0002102971,0.00023547094,0.5952832,0.13129644,0.011528524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011318999,0.00028984307,0.03577004,0.00080313504,0.0003605922,0.0001495843,0.0506772,0.00016615668,0.00013187686,0.030714,0.8689624,0.0006561545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007756018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018143379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73766595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007086096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012567103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993026794","doi":"10.1353/scp.2011.0018","title":"The Sign of Four","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sign (mathematics); Task (project management); Plan (archaeology); Field (mathematics); Simple (philosophy); Work (physics); Computer science; Mathematics education; Sociology; Psychology; Management; Epistemology; Engineering; History; Mathematics; Economics; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.14520563111619367,"score_gpt":0.23520336454017937,"score_spread":0.0899977334239857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993026794","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40335774,0.0052990117,0.00034963022,0.013090157,0.003239443,0.00014922391,0.000012433561,0.000054703814,0.57444763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959764,0.00012718215,0.0011075194,0.00026448516,0.00067069544,0.0000015096364,0.0000011441257,0.00001632957,0.0018347548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997728,0.00033367414,0.0008443902,0.000087226785,0.000788693,0.00021802992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994273,0.00044383385,0.00124562,0.00046088366,0.0034521106,0.00012454449],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008387622,0.0001081625,0.00021265267,0.00025864647,0.0007176096,0.039714318,0.0023862808,0.00009110049,0.00024064329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066336296,0.00006784853,0.0001882218,0.00011214511,0.00019532458,0.11540925,0.00017410381,0.0018687105,0.000008004117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015646512,0.00019100744,0.0068245083,0.000020309375,0.00025326852,0.000015352665,0.07090387,0.0000022888319,0.00047658465,0.78489214,0.079905234,0.05635894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008192893,0.0004039601,0.019480022,0.00019277396,0.00008865362,0.00007324454,0.020349098,0.000022065684,0.0003323211,0.07033796,0.88767326,0.0002273584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027748832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000120623445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80776805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053956774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018773129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96128255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993032503","doi":"10.3138/jsp.41.2.145","title":"Judging Journal Prices","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inflation (cosmology); Point (geometry); Economics; Construct (python library); Index (typography); Set (abstract data type); Price index; Actuarial science; Econometrics; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04076531897022445,"score_gpt":0.22760159644746206,"score_spread":0.1868362774772376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993032503","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7695128,0.008448181,0.017483255,0.022912806,0.003351197,0.000066959474,0.000016067057,0.000026804624,0.17818193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98920065,0.0003282395,0.006504604,0.002072308,0.001492489,2.576499e-7,9.1617125e-7,0.000010087844,0.00039043758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981073,0.00002879484,0.0013361863,0.00015136949,0.00008761737,0.00028870176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973087,0.00006569256,0.0018375911,0.0001777712,0.00035800517,0.00025227494],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006344649,0.00012130478,0.0003822525,0.0008283108,0.00040800145,0.020902602,0.00087923714,0.0001476888,0.00032748317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031673517,0.00012317969,0.00025229115,0.00030157657,0.000037242473,0.103173085,0.000039471488,0.0018399489,0.000084291285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025730962,0.000097243465,0.015829546,0.000004506599,0.00007523392,0.000043992117,0.00068522297,0.0002930867,0.0001783336,0.9657081,0.008783475,0.008275527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010780472,0.00024895667,0.0440143,0.000101760306,0.000015519629,0.0011290344,0.00049985485,0.00009558698,0.000085366344,0.60526097,0.3472059,0.00026470638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000057367374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.341024e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36044714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002461717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011085767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9801138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993184086","doi":"10.3138/jsp.46.1.003","title":"Monographic Purchasing Trends in Academic Libraries: Did the ‘Serials Crisis’ Really Destroy the University Press?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Purchasing; Proposition; Exploratory research; Sociology; History; Business; Social science; Marketing; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06664208371302845,"score_gpt":0.24993172618863285,"score_spread":0.18328964247560442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993184086","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7534279,0.0042346884,0.00043929447,0.16684128,0.001866955,0.00019634263,0.000020372807,0.00010894876,0.072864175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99545306,0.00036712867,0.0003035525,0.0011742682,0.001709898,0.0000015265182,0.000008353908,0.000023566012,0.0009586728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960144,0.0017667867,0.0008112091,0.00019867718,0.0008340823,0.00037482128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962709,0.00096056354,0.0010911121,0.000676124,0.0008474957,0.00015383522],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012987103,0.00019407526,0.00031984792,0.00075008365,0.001492347,0.0690671,0.004108762,0.00022114904,0.000049980135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041630473,0.00011863061,0.00022333676,0.00048318758,0.00028143352,0.13725038,0.00042693343,0.0052146357,0.0000016272486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003253435,0.00015638596,0.01310386,0.000024291972,0.00022805022,0.000016241858,0.106222175,0.0002936416,0.00035501426,0.6215058,0.21723346,0.040535755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078860426,0.00011577553,0.02377833,0.00016350497,0.00008150102,0.000027374863,0.022480331,0.00017046875,0.00002310319,0.011625721,0.94054323,0.00020207258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075782096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002868964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72330976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012172385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014404587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994450867","doi":"10.3138/jsp.46.2.02","title":"Activism, Legitimation, or Record: Towards a New Tripartite Typology of Academic Journals","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Postmodernism in Literature and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Legitimation; Publishing; Sociology; Categorization; Scholarly communication; Public relations; Politics; Political science; Media studies; Social science; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.10470575669553525,"score_gpt":0.3200509121590254,"score_spread":0.21534515546349017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994450867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79266995,0.0035021626,0.0068976213,0.07375682,0.012097792,0.0002638029,0.000024437913,0.000058741392,0.11072865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97962326,0.00016272746,0.0022525326,0.002020413,0.008678399,0.0000018003146,0.000005327241,0.000024274337,0.0072312583],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977526,0.00022543527,0.0010477029,0.0001280174,0.00059069344,0.00025554458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995993,0.00024474948,0.0015547592,0.00017108604,0.0017986915,0.00023768502],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033093817,0.0001423027,0.0003923533,0.0005923632,0.00020294769,0.009056258,0.0006141143,0.00021477976,0.0013112891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041672555,0.00010177382,0.00015232967,0.00013950643,0.00007640185,0.059713006,0.000046224828,0.0019367667,0.000010456416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006546253,0.00018667686,0.0022001786,0.00010371653,0.00026580092,0.000007648483,0.1377495,0.00002770073,0.0028346977,0.12567492,0.5117291,0.2185654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009803614,0.0004633094,0.0027345049,0.00044318475,0.00009665209,0.00015221552,0.0046345326,0.000050342685,0.0004773377,0.04331828,0.9464684,0.00018087612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015596604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056020464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43473926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007574825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062125264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996685280","doi":"10.1353/scp.2011.0028","title":"Manuscript Makeovers: A Rhetorical Study of Revisions Made to Dissertations Turned into Books","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; History; Literature; Linguistics; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.15433162896233357,"score_gpt":0.2957229695026195,"score_spread":0.14139134054028593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996685280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9466414,0.00046365394,0.0002024199,0.0035693261,0.0011243059,0.00027935268,0.000007906481,0.00004447934,0.047667164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99301565,0.000014957504,0.0036430724,0.0004350661,0.00045336282,0.000010237006,0.0000051342067,0.00002985391,0.0023926403],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99666375,0.00043323723,0.0013015438,0.00022285746,0.0010999744,0.0002786613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945783,0.00022910682,0.00096429995,0.00066891295,0.003177246,0.00038214822],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036851452,0.00019891832,0.00044120528,0.0009386101,0.0006596125,0.024465669,0.0020362106,0.00011945141,0.00047430873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00657828,0.00016456531,0.00019871898,0.0003230187,0.00006329951,0.08048314,0.00029124695,0.0020295503,0.000015869511],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037007467,0.0027675454,0.016644059,0.00005405874,0.00044052248,0.000047950976,0.77840716,0.0000114961,0.0023479247,0.13144164,0.056450445,0.011017137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004318921,0.0050898492,0.17546701,0.0011523776,0.000617199,0.00007658517,0.48457837,0.000040750125,0.00039222848,0.023068536,0.30417147,0.001026714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016508941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080783037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2938288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016954167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016913503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.976547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996769234","doi":"10.3138/jsp.32.1.9","title":"From Gutenberg to Gateway: Electronic Publishing at University Presses","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Gateway (web page); Electronic publishing; Product (mathematics); Variety (cybernetics); Marketing; The Internet; Business; Advertising; World Wide Web; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.027588866674516117,"score_gpt":0.21064490050474674,"score_spread":0.1830560338302306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996769234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8278733,0.0015327604,0.00006948416,0.04522361,0.0008328422,0.00013262633,0.000088218134,0.00012654669,0.12412061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9718173,0.00033246822,0.00086906896,0.0019617372,0.0027737436,0.000001343658,0.00010435799,0.000047612495,0.022092326],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963878,0.0005158048,0.0007849309,0.00036178777,0.0012940188,0.00065570447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99529594,0.0004464941,0.0006606085,0.0006907561,0.0023711594,0.0005350268],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004063455,0.0002678367,0.00042311003,0.0007200866,0.0012320628,0.1537925,0.0036886646,0.00025182066,0.0059070843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038762956,0.0002534362,0.0002556668,0.00040786937,0.000095129784,0.3073424,0.00047020474,0.003499196,0.00014319464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073790294,0.000433316,0.003462251,0.000023758017,0.0005914714,0.000117511474,0.07848388,0.00030749151,0.002451495,0.05174343,0.784615,0.077032514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008305839,0.00016709912,0.0026128537,0.00015339321,0.000078536366,0.000030515252,0.0045730025,0.000029949259,0.00009175575,0.0060040005,0.9851263,0.00030196537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035828631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001925958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20051137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009141257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004077997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996867325","doi":"10.3138/jsp.46.1.004","title":"From Book Publishers to Authors: Information Transparency in Web Sites","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Psychology Research and Bibliometrics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; University of Toronto","keywords":"Publishing; Transparency (behavior); Scholarly communication; Library science; Relation (database); World Wide Web; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.05652180461606684,"score_gpt":0.34914262430501675,"score_spread":0.29262081968894993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996867325","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8932699,0.0015311337,0.0034699833,0.034457598,0.0029482455,0.00021515226,0.00003790333,0.000045644258,0.06402444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883026,0.000042561376,0.0026504481,0.007193601,0.0011211183,0.000011107514,0.000035669775,0.000021398033,0.0006215009],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99599695,0.0005790771,0.001233993,0.00024497823,0.001302943,0.00064203667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99633586,0.000596403,0.000556663,0.00039507274,0.0014027532,0.00071327196],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009526873,0.00018332798,0.00039090303,0.012904598,0.00009443568,0.0279578,0.0016876122,0.0004869236,0.0014497308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014847375,0.00016065677,0.00014449903,0.008415521,0.000045609344,0.17952566,0.00009157588,0.0030609504,0.00023125684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033275157,0.00019093807,0.15364195,0.000009887312,0.000094398805,0.000041435716,0.0055168923,0.000012676439,0.0016095527,0.00058776117,0.78637654,0.051585235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030828028,0.00064926856,0.3114756,0.00011424745,0.000020560678,0.000059225633,0.0027375899,0.000051736522,0.00004661107,0.0026190472,0.67887974,0.00026357127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021491824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000061321036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15783364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016638741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018305896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994631},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1997180395","doi":"10.3138/jsp.32.4.189","title":"‘Schoeffling’ the Editorial Deck: A Tongue-In-Cheek Personal Note on Editing Two University Press Series with Ron Schoeffel","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Cheek; Series (stratigraphy); Computer science; Library science; Political science; Biology; Anatomy; Law","score_opus":0.021725566322573508,"score_gpt":0.24064965115843392,"score_spread":0.21892408483586043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997180395","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0076737935,0.00087748474,0.000025823625,0.0059574577,0.9555438,0.00033680152,0.00024877003,0.00009239107,0.029243672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015469548,0.00030481498,0.00026621376,0.00014248386,0.97752905,0.000005542045,0.00015159087,0.000113610084,0.0060171327],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99104995,0.0013537566,0.0012389525,0.0006143062,0.0049138735,0.00082916324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855632,0.003013472,0.0028034875,0.0008678724,0.007375348,0.00037662993],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011948111,0.00069237454,0.0009563948,0.0010324083,0.0019872251,0.107359156,0.004577977,0.0011551355,0.00006597239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019266888,0.0005030568,0.00041705128,0.00039678844,0.00039492772,0.13250789,0.0005168874,0.0229682,0.000006983299],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012406874,0.00017989882,0.0002816212,0.00005287749,0.00020439556,0.0001551264,0.012889936,0.00008374454,0.000012263858,0.0021869685,0.9817131,0.000999348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031135897,0.000618883,0.00014838416,0.001669122,0.00021871418,0.000035564688,0.008892561,0.000032598433,0.0000043064692,0.00022442674,0.98450553,0.0005362866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033137463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034552284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025148746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013609206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019124062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997472342","doi":"10.1353/scp.2013.0003","title":"Artist Scholar: Reflections on Writing and Research (review)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Artistic and Creative Research","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Art history; Sociology","score_opus":0.26879760857483037,"score_gpt":0.4075150003111257,"score_spread":0.13871739173629533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997472342","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.090879545,0.018903766,0.00009216561,0.04541255,0.0002497452,0.00035735278,0.000010024853,0.000031473886,0.8440634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824662,0.0041153743,0.00090548425,0.0019724204,0.0020626755,0.000020938633,0.0000024429705,0.000027617207,0.008426849],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99690175,0.0005586129,0.0005692437,0.00017881904,0.0013842828,0.0004072919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935487,0.00067426916,0.00023561362,0.00017755617,0.0050402354,0.00032360607],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009057823,0.00011289472,0.00024646873,0.00052758,0.0016087644,0.031244306,0.00043475014,0.00006719842,0.0027298706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01070089,0.000084528096,0.000081284874,0.00020353255,0.00030409024,0.044121813,0.00015293664,0.0041145785,0.00018235455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025712392,0.00014297367,0.0013141796,0.00019240945,0.0000856126,0.0000385805,0.0038214417,5.763698e-7,0.00074014155,0.5111086,0.40800062,0.074529156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048585958,0.0006308983,0.0070792334,0.0025275925,0.000028311673,0.00008966313,0.032499794,0.00001726435,0.00006144603,0.01491593,0.941474,0.00019000591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023731307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000039453716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89158666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013083525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001418896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997955109","doi":"10.3138/jsp.41.3.325","title":"Negotiating Roles and Relationships","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Personality psychology; Publishing; Negotiation; Product (mathematics); Process (computing); Interdependence; Work (physics); World Wide Web; Computer science; Sociology; Library science; Public relations; Management; Psychology; Political science; Engineering; Social science; Personality","score_opus":0.054397762292143124,"score_gpt":0.2353387843951722,"score_spread":0.18094102210302906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997955109","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90484244,0.0015296743,0.000103209524,0.014205615,0.0017019861,0.000053322052,0.0000059727213,0.000047531204,0.07751022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994232,0.000040005605,0.0030314776,0.0002713813,0.001647276,0.0000012847419,0.0000052807854,0.000017646507,0.0007536331],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829346,0.00024398422,0.00059363496,0.00011729133,0.0005653457,0.00018628889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99628145,0.00055411673,0.0007049196,0.00028436058,0.001975331,0.00019984417],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073670764,0.000112124115,0.00018080483,0.0004370246,0.0010565447,0.13601772,0.000824442,0.00015398682,0.00009712186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016258845,0.00009421059,0.000069353315,0.000098684985,0.00012481317,0.18218577,0.00015036408,0.005767615,0.000005131206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019935396,0.00007582532,0.055280805,0.000013191182,0.00006454201,0.000009100145,0.03345344,0.00001887788,0.0022956484,0.8750569,0.015482011,0.018229702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011020395,0.00012864749,0.05866568,0.00015228648,0.00008862588,0.00037659737,0.026078044,0.0005473465,0.00004467701,0.03948682,0.8729427,0.00038655542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011653446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030909557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8574607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028267727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011931143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998184666","doi":"10.3138/jsp.32.4.204","title":"Living a Project","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Wikis in Education and Collaboration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scale (ratio); Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Geography; Cartography","score_opus":0.05497457020867789,"score_gpt":0.35760412261897295,"score_spread":0.30262955241029504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998184666","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65839404,0.00070825225,0.00091490574,0.04489991,0.0028915436,0.00012958702,6.11936e-7,0.000042959342,0.29201818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893215,0.0002593633,0.0026361437,0.0010216811,0.0026818586,0.0000017632258,3.1345655e-7,0.0000069218745,0.0040704873],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982087,0.00032968182,0.00031884463,0.00007365665,0.00089109084,0.00017803765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968656,0.00019879101,0.0003989856,0.000082293096,0.002328629,0.00012573026],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006873056,0.000049113525,0.00009420532,0.0003301065,0.00046920602,0.027429998,0.00049101986,0.000107729174,0.00021155557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014911656,0.000045108016,0.000055370758,0.0011456514,0.00004074395,0.08375554,0.000028054672,0.0006386767,0.000007716475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004809145,0.0004057751,0.2889159,0.00001101691,0.00007424637,0.000047394635,0.18357973,0.000025706882,0.0007765691,0.10330185,0.2766923,0.14612141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012313233,0.000035685942,0.018064005,0.00007794167,0.0000099004155,0.000023737548,0.054235715,0.0000056802205,0.0000053111025,0.0016369298,0.92570955,0.0000724393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040394164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003477651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6490172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024790585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015616729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99338615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998875672","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0046","title":"Should Graduate Students Publish?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Writing and Publishing","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Context (archaeology); Graduate students; Process (computing); Field (mathematics); Publishing; Wish; Expansive; Psychology; Mathematics education; Public relations; Computer science; Sociology; Pedagogy; Political science; History; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.17058094809257957,"score_gpt":0.31784448703196094,"score_spread":0.14726353893938138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998875672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65637743,0.0019712735,0.00016915506,0.106052816,0.004289645,0.00015408474,0.00002029615,0.00018841094,0.23077688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97707295,0.00006540862,0.0005360077,0.009278307,0.008756134,0.0000010299004,0.000008811458,0.000029781866,0.004251595],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99499035,0.00019763983,0.0011833019,0.00025592966,0.0028125711,0.0005602276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99463946,0.0002198006,0.0011024224,0.00026734045,0.003343638,0.00042732968],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009098479,0.00025440188,0.0004471977,0.0008117684,0.0006342093,0.17059886,0.0026463636,0.00025350632,0.00036834672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007660996,0.00020643363,0.00028142624,0.00025138492,0.000095707546,0.21690653,0.00015859507,0.0051569724,0.000021497268],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006535613,0.0002614269,0.00826674,0.000020696438,0.000120203404,0.00011115378,0.02574577,0.000014771094,0.00020340577,0.13060072,0.7912053,0.043384496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014501183,0.0003777216,0.015162058,0.00038026055,0.000097997094,0.0001763832,0.014637901,0.000018716364,0.000054552547,0.033415753,0.93377614,0.00045241092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000096167285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016973674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3206955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015281768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019452463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99713814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001228739","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44-4-004","title":"Publishing in Educational Research Journals: Are Graduate Students Participating?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Graduate education; Field (mathematics); Graduate students; Sociology; Literacy; Work (physics); Educational research; Pedagogy; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.4560840028282161,"score_gpt":0.4928311418851949,"score_spread":0.036747139056978795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001228739","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8733793,0.0024843176,0.000011905494,0.102543585,0.002385118,0.00019373317,0.0000038945927,0.0000106147445,0.018987538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939633,0.000083897045,0.001040434,0.00095416023,0.0021424235,0.00010189941,0.0000048891493,0.000030581472,0.0016783888],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928536,0.001330099,0.0015958822,0.00034548072,0.0029670484,0.00090792845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884717,0.0023697226,0.0013670982,0.00037414,0.0069511994,0.0004661317],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.019889003,0.00020038804,0.00041698516,0.0015298057,0.00041969336,0.08791801,0.0025221487,0.00033232974,0.003647705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03183626,0.00016991388,0.00015385072,0.001556818,0.00013823448,0.10547323,0.00032552387,0.006030414,0.0001859505],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028832228,0.00048965856,0.72100353,0.000015944644,0.00008792305,0.00003032883,0.0037912808,0.000034340886,0.00008469466,0.005112821,0.26712322,0.0021973923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007059252,0.00010978431,0.9198426,0.00036688303,0.000010545931,0.0001783226,0.04261485,0.000004662201,0.0000061976266,0.031742167,0.0042638774,0.00015418204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024448356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012023634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26285934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000532575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006297683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001302201","doi":"10.3138/jsp.41.2.131","title":"Publishing as a Vocation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Ideology; Politics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Service (business); Quality (philosophy); Epistemology; Public relations; Law; Social science; Political science; History; Philosophy; Marketing; Business","score_opus":0.5157213604975961,"score_gpt":0.5415540772126118,"score_spread":0.025832716715015747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001302201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73254323,0.003291417,0.011426373,0.1518081,0.002255953,0.00015827574,0.000006372567,0.000034008706,0.098476246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886027,0.00012886531,0.005261632,0.0033766185,0.00095749414,5.510788e-7,0.0000017362248,0.000009808678,0.0016606025],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9722163,0.0005081642,0.0019342834,0.0004842266,0.024183504,0.0006735376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9459733,0.004458832,0.0024871281,0.0009289947,0.04473691,0.0014148828],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12752986,0.00016258807,0.00042518362,0.076472804,0.0004126253,0.5350269,0.007939667,0.00033182232,0.0003907697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5986823,0.00011172844,0.00032374958,0.14033465,0.000055447577,0.39901203,0.00046464516,0.0030922985,0.00013078211],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004842362,0.00016793003,0.038625203,0.0000015915532,0.000019640633,0.000082333136,0.00041055938,0.000047425783,0.0026780148,0.010978588,0.22082254,0.72611773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014592003,0.0008813133,0.41078317,0.000069539456,0.000017041231,0.0005725854,0.0022340966,0.0007044958,0.0008780383,0.27859673,0.3034954,0.0003083788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006491199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000036803488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7258094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035780887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009703819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001956072","doi":"10.1353/scp.2011.0040","title":"University Press Forum 2011: The End of the Tunnel?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theme (computing); Publishing; Stupidity; Subject (documents); Sociology; Media studies; Law; Library science; Political science; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07487764539186842,"score_gpt":0.20189384203849753,"score_spread":0.1270161966466291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001956072","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5001186,0.002525876,0.00011252509,0.03988474,0.0031392078,0.0002330626,0.000052572672,0.000041967094,0.45389146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935956,0.00007278272,0.00022455015,0.00040435622,0.00033223515,3.4736232e-7,0.0000012687453,0.000011819701,0.0053570457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804133,0.00048806533,0.0004627705,0.000097869946,0.0007039534,0.00020599918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961245,0.0002287347,0.0010483571,0.0006284473,0.0018812189,0.000088753666],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038581924,0.000109681656,0.00018277118,0.000158043,0.000850184,0.014032305,0.0036895752,0.0000980454,0.0003182138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015451991,0.000060844282,0.00023425503,0.00009791184,0.00033244348,0.08507466,0.00048234075,0.0021149432,0.000002977957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120401084,0.00022372956,0.014913749,0.00001975723,0.00023494779,0.000007320064,0.06938379,0.0000069743173,0.00029625365,0.72552055,0.18276459,0.0065079094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052349514,0.00009552524,0.03323915,0.00010178314,0.00009925732,0.000029607698,0.027171036,0.000015695934,0.00021732201,0.0061774827,0.932202,0.00012763779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015148144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045261436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7494374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000078546065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018433097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9869912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002354079","doi":"10.3138/jsp.41.4.428","title":"Scholar as E-Publisher","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Wikis in Education and Collaboration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); World Wide Web; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Data science; Public relations","score_opus":0.020564466250884855,"score_gpt":0.32926658211719323,"score_spread":0.30870211586630836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002354079","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62103677,0.00014274937,0.00006363107,0.07596811,0.009164859,0.00007465754,9.2554905e-7,0.000034414563,0.2935139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979147,0.00004236452,0.0069524553,0.0031434575,0.004563427,0.000002249847,0.0000018265572,0.000014852266,0.006132326],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972782,0.00030806503,0.00047158095,0.00013051859,0.0015499602,0.0002616624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929062,0.00015719442,0.0005699714,0.00020218689,0.0057398,0.00042465527],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01260143,0.00008539721,0.0001426606,0.00042047838,0.00090165884,0.076689504,0.001117626,0.0003149197,0.0012304442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052936174,0.00007936745,0.00009364915,0.00112784,0.00010870352,0.1899803,0.00004717702,0.0035724721,0.0000590226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003396611,0.00023215786,0.037380673,0.0000053234926,0.00004967385,0.000017778188,0.024556678,0.000003740082,0.006575404,0.40108773,0.46763104,0.062425844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002702347,0.000030392861,0.010031607,0.000015328624,0.000011959812,0.000018426284,0.014886073,9.2754976e-7,0.000101213176,0.019172905,0.9553646,0.00009636173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003530786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004911215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48773354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000144485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002367261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002521051","doi":"10.3138/jsp.45.3.001","title":"What I've Learned about Publishing a Book","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Appeal; Proofreading; Process (computing); Focus (optics); Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05877958382005687,"score_gpt":0.2593707766976626,"score_spread":0.20059119287760574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002521051","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18752879,0.03877618,0.0015749787,0.26429784,0.019118793,0.00042790984,0.000023112412,0.00050522754,0.48774716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9588707,0.0012717164,0.0016102833,0.0149284275,0.007698538,0.000008885473,0.000045623052,0.0001013329,0.015464491],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945121,0.0009852295,0.0014920783,0.0003632451,0.0020063596,0.00064101187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99006784,0.00087466906,0.0019275431,0.0009506131,0.005642036,0.0005372806],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017472504,0.0003328614,0.000594391,0.001160602,0.0012435707,0.58737063,0.0039569493,0.00036764026,0.0007749134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02688415,0.0002855002,0.00039866238,0.00031331857,0.00020770183,0.7015165,0.0004935358,0.006317091,0.00005465005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011575478,0.00024428024,0.0014265083,0.000058715308,0.00024268997,0.000021399972,0.056343965,0.00005066699,0.00038903984,0.3069717,0.49602517,0.13811013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011654517,0.00020047832,0.0011185141,0.0005824091,0.00006618848,0.000075039665,0.012644014,0.00018282008,0.000040219922,0.016426539,0.96715385,0.00034450038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022429197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018673402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7713419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002862732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003430429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004441857","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44.3.005","title":"Source References and the Scientist's Mind-Map: Harvard vs. Vancouver Style","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Style (visual arts); Reading (process); Order (exchange); Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Space (punctuation); Ideal (ethics); Search engine indexing; Mind map; Process (computing); Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Linguistics; Literature; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.013107228913788238,"score_gpt":0.2322029804361854,"score_spread":0.21909575152239716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004441857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9816963,0.002834306,0.002379389,0.010086985,0.0010971016,0.000099899284,0.0000033648996,0.0000071966865,0.0017954704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890141,0.00013428406,0.006044136,0.0011548363,0.00059641217,0.0000037870318,0.0000030940428,0.000009389909,0.0030400013],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986513,0.00015217715,0.00035006262,0.00017884065,0.00044718868,0.0002203947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985665,0.00009589107,0.0003494078,0.00019010279,0.00064133893,0.00015673258],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023607344,0.00010781757,0.0001918265,0.00008887785,0.00020860136,0.007681562,0.00064615736,0.00020607158,0.00008744065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037326328,0.000061080034,0.00009194894,0.00012255575,0.00040799766,0.0007687075,0.0002455001,0.00065062876,0.000010218949],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023613647,0.0000663687,0.018377611,0.000027497286,0.00020704107,0.000007669741,0.00080723804,0.000006387512,0.019217934,0.00016431524,0.6815073,0.27937448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016627698,0.00025444702,0.011218685,0.000061398634,0.00003316861,0.00006909398,0.0019113999,0.000041798598,0.0015830594,0.0007111232,0.9823205,0.00013253908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007763178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004948274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3008132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012598411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010535403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99334854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005122924","doi":"10.1353/scp.2011.0039","title":"Appraising Internationality in Spanish Communication Journals","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Psychology Research and Bibliometrics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sample (material); Spanish language; Foreign language; Political science; Scientific communication; International communication; Library science; Sociology; Linguistics; Computer science; Pedagogy; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3316836671136026,"score_gpt":0.4401145310481184,"score_spread":0.10843086393451579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005122924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8446737,0.0060119657,0.0020615298,0.0050195125,0.0012927719,0.000094687006,0.0000054688567,0.00001662981,0.14082375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99314654,0.00029291766,0.0051953667,0.0007876139,0.00029734112,0.0000029043897,0.0000027612743,0.000016742804,0.00025780752],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963205,0.00091674726,0.0011091798,0.00018905019,0.0010549185,0.0004096324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99554527,0.00051271106,0.001036147,0.00042541188,0.002192227,0.0002882341],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017375177,0.00012349273,0.00029374028,0.007308651,0.00011677893,0.0073516374,0.002068688,0.0003027164,0.0016058737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009466712,0.0001097989,0.00014247748,0.005021056,0.00010093495,0.04660369,0.00020564362,0.0037804355,0.00003911986],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034453618,0.0007699014,0.9090849,0.000007367974,0.00018185102,0.0002736985,0.0051613133,0.0000010861183,0.00066087605,0.008664074,0.030703519,0.044146854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015008457,0.00015270559,0.97119963,0.0001400265,0.000011788006,0.0006520369,0.0019114927,0.0000037536809,0.00006183871,0.015674165,0.008576098,0.00011564415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027252914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041620144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14847286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016838119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001349482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005485269","doi":"10.3138/jsp.40.4.384","title":"How Scholars Credit Editors in Their Acknowledgements","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; Arizona State University; Princeton University","keywords":"Acknowledgement; Publishing; Invisibility; Publication; Library science; Sociology; Dual (grammatical number); Media studies; Political science; History; Law; Computer science; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.047719274696162384,"score_gpt":0.24787138162303507,"score_spread":0.20015210692687269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005485269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7388353,0.0054406184,0.00016024022,0.12830949,0.02354879,0.00030071413,0.00002860979,0.00014845237,0.103227794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779944,0.00010345367,0.00070556765,0.0012711774,0.016764166,0.0000024774067,0.00001527148,0.000025601194,0.0031178913],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693066,0.0004004787,0.0008686876,0.00023248148,0.001118081,0.0004496009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932867,0.00020634304,0.00090784684,0.0005294553,0.004800474,0.00026915155],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007064474,0.0002479743,0.0004120231,0.0012845558,0.0005101483,0.17785138,0.0025735486,0.00022876482,0.00020828134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015044591,0.00020074364,0.00022028339,0.0003626951,0.000086901775,0.30465913,0.00016730731,0.0045052003,0.000020213394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011799993,0.00072952406,0.01172884,0.00002375375,0.00013538096,0.000051758325,0.032844692,0.000017299197,0.001190304,0.028410913,0.8360869,0.08866261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00122859,0.00027015628,0.017787326,0.00029164803,0.000023646067,0.000016727055,0.00859558,0.000029516752,0.0000933549,0.014538997,0.9568546,0.00026990127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025524176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000117435746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2391591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003381571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024814234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99779147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006242952","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44.3.007","title":"Death of a Small Journal?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Citation; History; Recipe; Data science; Sociology; Library science; Computer science; Social science; Biology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.6375061667817558,"score_gpt":0.5179158316989042,"score_spread":0.11959033508285155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006242952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9570916,0.0036204278,0.011953519,0.01103209,0.0015272213,0.000115223,0.0000043387163,0.0000053584454,0.014650164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771862,0.00041781686,0.019897804,0.0004032099,0.0005543592,8.6332625e-7,2.2130155e-7,0.0000137805555,0.0015257513],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98032653,0.00053686195,0.0024093136,0.00026858304,0.0158773,0.0005813911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.920997,0.005593712,0.0038112518,0.0006925387,0.06743026,0.0014752231],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.095818155,0.00014274019,0.00054792163,0.072009265,0.00027070317,0.19747521,0.007158888,0.00022308202,0.0012529914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.33231595,0.00008551744,0.0004505574,0.07514573,0.000082732986,0.12344801,0.00076390273,0.0028216927,0.00009593195],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026150032,0.00021193514,0.63712376,0.000008525702,0.000078798264,0.00007550298,0.00033653874,0.00006516387,0.0040772995,0.0017086323,0.11156931,0.24471839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016375092,0.00081746955,0.7507422,0.000115305076,0.000025633279,0.001295023,0.0022842004,0.0007787687,0.0012356492,0.14034998,0.1004594,0.0002588818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001316369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000019672866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24445951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001891675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007997171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008471573","doi":"10.1353/scp.2006.0016","title":"Views on Popular-Science Publishing","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Science Education and Perceptions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Popular science; Government (linguistics); China; Legislation; Field (mathematics); Political science; Quality (philosophy); Public relations; Law; Science education","score_opus":0.11352007102727892,"score_gpt":0.38016799884129165,"score_spread":0.26664792781401275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008471573","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7029938,0.00040526196,0.0006461264,0.042657334,0.008470884,0.00009768834,0.000005454657,0.000041909254,0.24468154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98401195,0.000006692231,0.0031211693,0.004577938,0.00286108,0.000004308292,0.000004596137,0.000017694694,0.0053945784],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99622136,0.00021317766,0.0008553716,0.00035054891,0.0018220011,0.0005375493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996134,0.00015248983,0.00079626724,0.0004802201,0.002053867,0.00038315076],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011040428,0.00015377645,0.00023019046,0.0015209157,0.0006446876,0.070962824,0.0022387668,0.00019294518,0.0018253304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064057773,0.00012635044,0.00016605976,0.0023631647,0.00021209693,0.14614539,0.00009247886,0.0022655877,0.0002090425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041781313,0.0005877028,0.070370495,0.000004463025,0.000019253692,0.000040359977,0.006016025,0.00008021304,0.008135863,0.15699504,0.7140082,0.0437006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006474151,0.00015213246,0.5943149,0.0000719228,0.000017010067,0.00032753736,0.006458709,0.000011025904,0.00008023426,0.0063846563,0.39132482,0.00020967971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040330863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000051631476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5239444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003482275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005299416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99908715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009710424","doi":"10.3138/jsp.42.4.397","title":"Sustaining Scholarly Publishing: New Business Models for University Presses","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scholarly communication; Scholarship; Digital scholarship; Business model; Quality (philosophy); Public relations; Product (mathematics); Scientific communication; Sociology; Electronic publishing; Business; Marketing; Management; Library science; Political science; The Internet; Economics; Computer science; World Wide Web; Law","score_opus":0.16031232265160986,"score_gpt":0.23685522509063286,"score_spread":0.07654290243902301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009710424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11155665,0.010102474,0.12392905,0.07701539,0.007915446,0.0012881958,0.00023421383,0.0007368952,0.66722167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9559679,0.00027711553,0.028573554,0.0012000207,0.0033514886,0.0000037300329,0.00008910398,0.00010610638,0.0104309665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960459,0.0004094031,0.0011009477,0.00041318545,0.0013453753,0.00068518415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9782295,0.0005687574,0.0017814386,0.00080338365,0.017949032,0.00066786504],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008356635,0.00035702187,0.0005687937,0.001480492,0.0014928725,0.29148638,0.0050750105,0.00042981326,0.0003159037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021188585,0.00033872033,0.00035106242,0.0006307317,0.00016960154,0.71856225,0.00049366686,0.004012711,0.0000056080826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000715895,0.00042696897,0.002701977,0.000119219556,0.00044008557,0.000047254707,0.07281603,0.00015083294,0.0003606726,0.68187046,0.21370822,0.02664241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031966998,0.00028213774,0.0032219249,0.0004136595,0.00024177993,0.00006230611,0.029955607,0.00018305545,0.00008568132,0.11260071,0.84916013,0.000596301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027741853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040914543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84441125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004038122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016034577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011285045","doi":"10.3138/jsp.32.4.195","title":"Two-Faced at the Interface: Meditations on the Manuscript Review Committee","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Interface (matter); Process (computing); Research integrity; Editorial board; Academic integrity; Library science; Business; Political science; Management; Media studies; Computer science; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Economics; Operating system","score_opus":0.5769549932795691,"score_gpt":0.5507350731102838,"score_spread":0.026219920169285316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011285045","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25594494,0.047038402,0.0013918907,0.64754003,0.0028034726,0.00039639062,0.000016876023,0.000012948456,0.04485506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.941926,0.013858981,0.00066593336,0.025777476,0.00093045796,0.000011977623,0.0000021281846,0.000026310085,0.016800739],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9795683,0.0014513342,0.0015069441,0.00033607165,0.016628724,0.0005086198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9608668,0.020018728,0.0017219888,0.001370577,0.0154664675,0.0005554468],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1334789,0.00015990526,0.0003722883,0.014387374,0.0011094928,0.08865302,0.008462537,0.00009884459,0.0023329868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.35897157,0.00006499588,0.00034240703,0.08559931,0.0001927245,0.033552803,0.0011920106,0.0029838386,0.0004214953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020859157,0.00005562776,0.010231111,0.000004688233,0.000030853087,0.000026739126,0.00017306402,0.000040795574,0.00026865653,0.0013569015,0.94034284,0.04744785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005105642,0.00019359507,0.028766837,0.00035124455,0.000025526035,0.00028051343,0.0018973243,0.00019040235,0.00015660003,0.009202949,0.9582977,0.00012668683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042586154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000043286822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68598104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033478907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002597839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99931633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012059786","doi":"10.3138/jsp.45-1-005","title":"The Editorial Board: Essential or Superfluous?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Medical Research and Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Editorial board; Business; On board; Public relations; Computer science; Operations management; Political science; Engineering; Library science","score_opus":0.06079364291620477,"score_gpt":0.4486516182475685,"score_spread":0.38785797533136374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012059786","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025083646,0.0033949309,0.000056141685,0.024062203,0.9639295,0.0005431606,0.0000662546,0.000034293866,0.0076627205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000043455402,0.007889714,0.00032976005,0.0003858591,0.96554285,0.00004992713,0.000046378074,0.000093996845,0.025618078],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9775237,0.005074194,0.0027797637,0.00041721348,0.012603684,0.0016014868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8378247,0.11625005,0.0075312085,0.0014105735,0.033871748,0.0031117105],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04635063,0.00043431285,0.0009965163,0.0004924643,0.003428342,0.0402347,0.00464325,0.0044708103,0.003324235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.62779856,0.00021997177,0.00038530756,0.00056937104,0.00023262824,0.07978863,0.0009960722,0.056613743,0.0005646311],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015256521,0.000053724434,0.00008557426,0.00023274498,0.00029202807,0.0000970006,0.00051155646,1.8658072e-7,0.000034369066,0.000091006485,0.9912097,0.0058664475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021358798,0.0004706601,0.000028108192,0.0011321133,0.00013204837,0.000006015307,0.0021691676,0.0000037501443,0.0000023918572,0.00084205274,0.9928434,0.00023444823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014059657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032242792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5814479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007338042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021688381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012075367","doi":"10.1353/scp.2011.0031","title":"Subject and Historiographic Characteristics of Library History: Disciplinary Considerations and Scholarship","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Library history; Subject (documents); Scholarship; Intellectual history; Reading (process); Library science; Publishing; Sociology; Professional association; Cultural history; Field (mathematics); History; Media studies; Social science; Law; Anthropology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.10555386153857105,"score_gpt":0.2732251663612801,"score_spread":0.16767130482270903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012075367","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97917384,0.0022156658,0.000021044158,0.005638396,0.0006634974,0.00007029024,0.0000062693257,0.000017852532,0.012193135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99511707,0.00050468993,0.0034733976,0.0003213385,0.0002818621,6.552864e-7,0.000001771001,0.0000075285243,0.00029170932],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984972,0.0002460925,0.00046361572,0.00013425882,0.00049776986,0.00016109098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848014,0.00019226928,0.0006254208,0.00009876021,0.00032034467,0.00028306505],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002397862,0.00008264076,0.00019513107,0.00042902172,0.00039577432,0.003948132,0.0002834022,0.00013465868,0.000168549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022618934,0.000074888056,0.000057867965,0.0002979508,0.00044018377,0.13714167,0.00007976248,0.0006216104,3.8462588e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034045326,0.00006746605,0.8917677,0.00001943621,0.000020307814,0.00003790356,0.026462035,2.2071088e-8,0.0007924371,0.07549531,0.003428335,0.0018749943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026147923,0.00024693366,0.9381262,0.0001124843,0.00003756634,0.000050877836,0.0037972995,0.0000017004288,0.00010930556,0.033806182,0.023310881,0.00013907724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008926528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032273907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13319354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052496613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094033155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99708587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012544756","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44-4-002","title":"Is the E-Reader Mightier? Direct Publishing and Entry Barriers","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Agency (philosophy); Promotion (chess); Face (sociological concept); Political science; Advertising; Public relations; Media studies; Business; Sociology; Law; Politics; Social science","score_opus":0.03869342367681968,"score_gpt":0.2299715083808031,"score_spread":0.19127808470398341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012544756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4523025,0.008727149,0.000037309306,0.29409668,0.0022059963,0.00028707698,0.000027275843,0.00009829796,0.24221773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98203564,0.00026032818,0.00046700228,0.009507422,0.0019995007,0.000012167166,0.000008229567,0.000040536506,0.0056691803],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964732,0.0005476664,0.0009429763,0.00026488522,0.0012948904,0.00047638363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99367666,0.0007584741,0.001004444,0.00066913903,0.0033643146,0.0005269649],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068821777,0.00025977162,0.00037065172,0.00053193193,0.0016686188,0.38486564,0.0025672126,0.00024079156,0.0013578037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012943444,0.00016662535,0.00022264576,0.0002466013,0.0003125671,0.3736921,0.00042963706,0.004266335,0.00002478402],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022197299,0.00005062231,0.015532807,0.00002609036,0.00025678833,0.000007093104,0.071019866,0.000002990884,0.00021027307,0.04067814,0.85059303,0.021600109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007517956,0.0000881433,0.011541065,0.00019932771,0.000086915206,0.00008095016,0.032671165,0.00011330692,0.000061079765,0.011714565,0.94239205,0.00029961407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013604205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000109920795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5297331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014032506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026097422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012547819","doi":"10.3138/jsp.32.2.87","title":"Notes from Down Under: Musings of a Junior Staff Member","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Object (grammar); Perspective (graphical); Task (project management); Product (mathematics); Sociology; Management; Media studies; Public relations; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Visual arts; Art; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0776723135779189,"score_gpt":0.2634900850854825,"score_spread":0.1858177715075636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012547819","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94461995,0.0018423696,0.00029998046,0.014706837,0.0011035308,0.00007075202,0.000035667075,0.000046943147,0.037273973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950452,0.00019218656,0.001504153,0.0007601012,0.0014180791,0.000002214283,0.000020191357,0.00003352059,0.0010243806],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996745,0.00033298833,0.00116333,0.00019748135,0.0011961263,0.00036511294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935725,0.0007196895,0.0014828176,0.0005755025,0.0033819557,0.00026753193],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044249133,0.00020791084,0.00048145044,0.00064975495,0.00048016044,0.057469573,0.0018163286,0.00019903092,0.0015394969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057466957,0.00017417474,0.00023753569,0.0002593644,0.00017957191,0.14671789,0.0002539095,0.0023810335,0.0000134335505],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000843378,0.0028290877,0.03316462,0.00012605717,0.002142637,0.00017733073,0.36904928,0.00039037116,0.027585186,0.28531986,0.119242586,0.15912957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023964948,0.0004417152,0.010641413,0.0005794224,0.0002043946,0.00007973596,0.039999448,0.00009727813,0.00043513824,0.045503017,0.89909697,0.00052496657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024613638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064410653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7798544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020704712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029749016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012566679","doi":"10.1353/scp.2012.0005","title":"Moving: The Transom","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Salary; Desk; Law; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.061452506991007384,"score_gpt":0.30812299236534507,"score_spread":0.2466704853743377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012566679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74212366,0.0011272122,0.0005094648,0.15467748,0.0020820661,0.00007412015,0.0000010570676,0.00001975041,0.09938521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99391824,0.00004928298,0.00070082356,0.0017976831,0.0025816516,3.7934194e-7,2.6795377e-7,0.0000034641378,0.0009481865],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981696,0.000249139,0.00026552158,0.00004927412,0.0009901474,0.00027633208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988963,0.00018793618,0.0002654138,0.00008438287,0.00030686863,0.00025909618],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008504349,0.00004682061,0.00007593301,0.000090617665,0.0007207005,0.022613367,0.0008803551,0.000081781596,0.00015177423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029309941,0.000028838629,0.00008384086,0.0004557877,0.00011341977,0.26061305,0.000021373082,0.00071345444,0.000008786928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026596974,0.0001792981,0.38427052,0.000006370013,0.00004127785,0.000011737262,0.12866548,0.0000123434165,0.0024432319,0.35619032,0.073608354,0.054544456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016264827,0.00004346781,0.07406407,0.000023083378,0.000014688638,0.000020644147,0.029823285,0.000003312561,0.00023734727,0.0050069364,0.89051896,0.00008152613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009995548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028418377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8169106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045646262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004407126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97840124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013123505","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.3.257","title":"The Relationship between Scholarly Communication and Science and Technology Studies (STS)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Scientific communication; Perspective (graphical); Publishing; Social science; Domain (mathematical analysis); Science communication; Science studies; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Epistemology; Bibliometrics; Scientometrics; Knowledge management; Computer science; Science education; Political science; Library science","score_opus":0.7096535341488244,"score_gpt":0.5563160358039946,"score_spread":0.1533374983448298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013123505","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9052243,0.036188163,0.0001998634,0.057316054,0.00019758042,0.00008852539,0.0000021810408,0.000010056637,0.00077324745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99187195,0.0039694,0.0036458292,0.00011221807,0.00009029694,0.0000016507289,1.4412683e-7,0.0000058398346,0.00030268426],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854823,0.0004829689,0.0011861552,0.00038253993,0.012005773,0.00046026972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8778169,0.04135305,0.0019354918,0.001386627,0.07671497,0.000792957],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14834894,0.000107508116,0.00029772363,0.042982463,0.004621019,0.1372951,0.0051499135,0.00017460648,0.0000024392452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.76110333,0.00006095584,0.00004380025,0.12465587,0.0025742014,0.14725116,0.0022741454,0.0027236599,0.000005800057],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050882754,0.0000096306885,0.93851566,0.0000013952314,0.0000138732275,0.0000054127354,0.00038765714,3.5198343e-7,0.00015899054,0.008961585,0.004802091,0.047138248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032176,0.0001069777,0.89079434,0.00002828333,0.00000741467,0.00022348901,0.0036755304,0.000024505605,0.00006266813,0.0894918,0.015190607,0.00007263924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015059118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006171421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6127544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024805355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086377445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013384111","doi":"10.3138/jsp.33.4.181","title":"Books for Understanding: The History So Far of AAUP's On-line Public Information Resource","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); Library science; Islam; Media studies; Political science; History; Classics; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.20619113195258182,"score_gpt":0.2946883560451012,"score_spread":0.08849722409251937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013384111","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06441525,0.002418506,0.045068882,0.52219033,0.0043540434,0.0008498952,0.000021505028,0.00008723378,0.36059433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99252164,0.000050862807,0.00048613004,0.003948684,0.0005400056,0.0000016480295,0.0000028008712,0.000004910122,0.0024433124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997898,0.00016256228,0.00053367036,0.00007270719,0.0011124053,0.00022067847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997887,0.00037417948,0.00090397877,0.00012339653,0.00055344537,0.00015799793],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054561943,0.00006993538,0.00012658286,0.00031023374,0.0006319361,0.011471178,0.00085175136,0.000116623116,0.00013404492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058004195,0.00004951458,0.00011920099,0.00032530297,0.0002557321,0.122667626,0.000028664,0.0005628353,0.000003129479],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039379254,0.00007161987,0.0010841326,0.000014332672,0.000027142562,0.0000014787331,0.040236358,0.000060651335,0.00008048165,0.59630996,0.34480187,0.017272614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031333975,0.00024333327,0.0002188547,0.000031865897,0.000009461689,0.0000034558311,0.019164605,0.00029762153,0.000025294421,0.008082655,0.97154516,0.00006435116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042262174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033008597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92810637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047389788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057378446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.989555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013512258","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44.3.006","title":"A Short Note on Pointless Reference Formatting","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disk formatting; Multitude; Simple (philosophy); Envelope (radar); Computer science; Public relations; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Telecommunications; Philosophy","score_opus":0.605079677102337,"score_gpt":0.5426055041927842,"score_spread":0.062474172909552816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013512258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93026733,0.00036910851,0.005103605,0.013708515,0.0010598953,0.00015446189,0.0000071311574,0.000015599093,0.049314365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924616,0.000066948174,0.005122301,0.0010696115,0.00037142762,0.000002608704,8.8052525e-7,0.00001346576,0.00089114066],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.976742,0.00035779143,0.0017298546,0.00041025362,0.02003178,0.00072830584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9569783,0.006283614,0.0012806867,0.00084924756,0.033342943,0.0012651773],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07596217,0.0001711931,0.00043035345,0.06041689,0.00041078316,0.25885367,0.0064852317,0.0002591302,0.00058022526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24801648,0.000106311236,0.00023956614,0.08131204,0.000069362104,0.16456713,0.00094892335,0.0032569417,0.0004957925],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002644716,0.00011566596,0.09339108,0.000004745265,0.00001970753,0.000038977072,0.00025118454,0.00004959726,0.0026086743,0.0016723347,0.09862162,0.80319995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011469955,0.00081116724,0.81897897,0.00020051117,0.000014517415,0.00034182472,0.0030685717,0.0040697125,0.0017881941,0.041178912,0.12790942,0.0004912301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000870842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000039599868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80270875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030648173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003587017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013757784","doi":"10.3138/jsp.33.3.166","title":"The Book Review: Scholarly and Editorial Responsibility","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Russian Literature and Bakhtin Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Sociology; Library science; Media studies; Publishing; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.025705324062307886,"score_gpt":0.29346644090116436,"score_spread":0.26776111683885645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013757784","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018934071,0.7006421,0.000007925158,0.24148466,0.018735027,0.00018348357,0.000003439522,0.000023355178,0.03702661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04132505,0.6213548,0.0016671664,0.046177413,0.2506463,0.000014986622,0.0000012833623,0.00005433684,0.038758673],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99589807,0.0010411273,0.00067737827,0.00018135736,0.0018467493,0.00035529525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952706,0.0010617733,0.00060575147,0.00023598528,0.002557251,0.00026864282],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.019722063,0.00012287441,0.00028630972,0.00011386046,0.0021586777,0.05523801,0.0008480836,0.0002164871,0.00009128611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05331895,0.00007570295,0.0001454623,0.0005114997,0.00030559566,0.11163062,0.00013289083,0.0025208613,0.000007765191],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028747903,0.000018666502,0.0013764945,0.000018097859,0.000032494707,0.000009664173,0.0029587606,1.7085013e-8,0.00002309946,0.0024750528,0.98375475,0.009304178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026903607,0.00006553386,0.0020511511,0.00042749112,0.00003741696,0.000014352254,0.0011627374,2.3600293e-7,0.0000027854483,0.0016093913,0.99426955,0.0000903402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004162754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033791588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23191126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013416223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001807037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014022919","doi":"10.3138/jsp.33.2.111","title":"Personalities in Publishing: Jane Dorner","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Personality psychology; Library science; Political science; Media studies; Computer science; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Psychoanalysis; Personality","score_opus":0.10712980704400502,"score_gpt":0.23882614423999593,"score_spread":0.13169633719599091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014022919","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4678973,0.010065331,0.00003186112,0.09853237,0.0024630146,0.00014217691,0.000028714197,0.000101816666,0.42073742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98338896,0.00023151733,0.0006522998,0.0023300557,0.0022867993,0.000005153294,0.000014199634,0.0000404542,0.011050589],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957787,0.0005364856,0.0012979603,0.0002593021,0.0015935756,0.0005340202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99480784,0.0005001974,0.0010077066,0.00053757813,0.0028408598,0.00030579403],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008487933,0.00025470462,0.0004655259,0.0014763013,0.00053336826,0.25664604,0.002739196,0.0002730934,0.0023898499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013585729,0.00021928766,0.00025754288,0.00041389113,0.00018879307,0.41456518,0.00026639987,0.005277426,0.000039457234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066598404,0.000576486,0.023826301,0.000057196256,0.00015285535,0.00013077159,0.15255633,0.00003498816,0.0001535244,0.29043573,0.4964941,0.035515115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016224799,0.00015130416,0.006768152,0.000328747,0.000036405767,0.00013844432,0.028009344,0.0002770056,0.000013756881,0.009854928,0.9524135,0.000385935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007579746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061791716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51549166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035458372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001281745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014274084","doi":"10.3138/jsp.33.1.37","title":"Why Design Is Important: Five Designers Speak to Non-Designers","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Crafts, Textile, and Design","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Subject (documents); Publishing; Panel discussion; Library science; Engineering; Management; History; Art history; Computer science; Advertising; Political science; Business; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.06166945028912792,"score_gpt":0.2540190474865207,"score_spread":0.1923495971973928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014274084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30714518,0.006501711,0.25529385,0.10860304,0.013608186,0.002972173,0.00013218024,0.00056628004,0.30517742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8854206,0.0004511886,0.026760114,0.056180127,0.009100791,0.000024591885,0.000010350307,0.00024916665,0.021803077],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956407,0.00025738004,0.0014171222,0.0004209888,0.0014852848,0.00077850063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950859,0.0004356489,0.0009883706,0.00043153198,0.0022750797,0.00078348577],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051135276,0.0004184621,0.0006407847,0.0011674602,0.0007486943,0.040358994,0.0013916807,0.0002228165,0.0026723093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018558573,0.0003529739,0.00039421802,0.00042411772,0.00014304537,0.054517597,0.00011265041,0.0015792703,0.0001181174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039958948,0.00015204435,0.0006455925,0.000018308036,0.00020180484,0.0005378521,0.050986737,0.00015659753,0.0023761564,0.00519751,0.9334409,0.005886902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021698754,0.0014412546,0.00077056896,0.00040862925,0.00023582295,0.0004487973,0.030983405,0.00027494805,0.0011876972,0.009207183,0.9518779,0.0009939376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005560244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001665011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5782754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002991183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042931773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014843591","doi":"10.3138/jsp.45.3.004","title":"Professionalization, University Presses, Specializations, and the Ecology of Art Historical Scholarship, 1970–2009","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Art History and Market Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scholarship; Professionalization; The arts; Sociology; Publication; Social science; History; Visual arts; Political science; Law; Art","score_opus":0.020011931535891682,"score_gpt":0.19860401254742427,"score_spread":0.1785920810115326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014843591","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27382487,0.013478376,0.02768495,0.18962775,0.012314477,0.0010413536,0.00006424965,0.0001520111,0.48181194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9642791,0.0003127955,0.0006254792,0.00080415723,0.001616421,6.9922123e-7,0.000014730587,0.000015383606,0.032331236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982316,0.00068678765,0.00045517436,0.00010530925,0.000410058,0.000111053116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99700385,0.00040548004,0.00077583594,0.00013778752,0.0015871641,0.00008985185],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031838764,0.00008551522,0.00028936975,0.00031867143,0.0006917134,0.0017401122,0.00042211617,0.00008651603,0.00065906206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004077269,0.000060045473,0.00011881006,0.00012808265,0.00024732854,0.018912455,0.00009768274,0.0006160918,0.0000030165484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029806825,0.00012336201,0.01565435,0.000035851685,0.00016430787,0.0000053946105,0.010419991,0.00002784345,0.00004092748,0.7066659,0.26464644,0.0019175606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085307384,0.000055434753,0.0036154657,0.000044130273,0.00015405366,0.000008156167,0.0009191089,0.00004659202,0.0000028124307,0.007070653,0.98716164,0.00006886698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000048301878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037418463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7225152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016510478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013661562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017700230","doi":"10.3138/jsp.32.2.61","title":"<i>The General Reader Market for University Press Books in the United States, 1990–9, With Projections for the Years 2000 through 2004</i>","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General theory; Purchasing; Sociology; Economics; Marketing; Business; Positive economics","score_opus":0.03458561553270501,"score_gpt":0.2320004262298236,"score_spread":0.19741481069711858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017700230","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17522046,0.0035996998,0.5501945,0.19429675,0.0021455842,0.003845575,0.00006232436,0.00018721604,0.070447855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1730323,0.0053726425,0.23892224,0.042596903,0.0049397075,0.0002609961,0.00008625677,0.000208674,0.5345803],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872,0.00013968197,0.00025364434,0.00014070112,0.00047742343,0.00026854995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980189,0.0009877443,0.00026746473,0.00021594248,0.00045693913,0.000053018135],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018756533,0.00009598667,0.00009815514,0.00017822368,0.0008001873,0.02168266,0.0017085706,0.00005484082,0.0000020201371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036485863,0.000048418486,0.00007719374,0.0011171214,0.000055866167,0.03761297,0.00010143452,0.00052683527,1.4628583e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006618666,0.00008716194,0.0037483387,0.0000082670185,0.00013900461,0.000035207777,0.0061852224,0.0017800127,0.000003619984,0.013423117,0.9652173,0.008710914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088018435,0.00012616081,0.0036530157,0.000022580209,0.000012506554,0.00009193784,0.0017184871,0.0031770263,0.000007761351,0.0012405779,0.98898876,0.000081028615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022737634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007601438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46413243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010896037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042798158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9793329},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019068074","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0089","title":"Negotiating Roles and Relationships: Stepping Through the Minefield of Co-Authors and Textbook Publishers","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Negotiation; Personality psychology; Product (mathematics); Process (computing); Computer science; Interdependence; Sociology; Work (physics); Library science; World Wide Web; Management; Public relations; Media studies; Psychology; Political science; Social science; Law; Personality; Engineering","score_opus":0.06601810335899255,"score_gpt":0.26563685819447697,"score_spread":0.1996187548354844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019068074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8970333,0.0038876014,0.0001622393,0.022875518,0.0010103546,0.000138592,0.000010633091,0.000031120813,0.07485066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99611944,0.00007720489,0.0019536417,0.00039027235,0.00072207174,0.0000026538162,0.000005984388,0.000020214704,0.0007084967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765116,0.00041282072,0.00086727855,0.00016577203,0.00067510136,0.00022786373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952121,0.0014216475,0.001202865,0.00039075414,0.0016274822,0.00014520095],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0080885375,0.00015912995,0.00028125785,0.00032194538,0.0012197613,0.0915866,0.0009765018,0.00021655277,0.00005921878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01492774,0.00011172205,0.00008409685,0.00013965384,0.00036034107,0.16019262,0.00020446851,0.0050524343,7.125046e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006635892,0.00012541303,0.08370799,0.00009027614,0.00028219834,0.0000071439645,0.20064358,0.000055502755,0.0029944517,0.64151114,0.04841574,0.022100203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018289748,0.00028749605,0.048660483,0.0005523586,0.0002513831,0.00036073785,0.21590902,0.00064145174,0.00012747725,0.038025923,0.69276744,0.00058727176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041401284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034938753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64435166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024009532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013471926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019123976","doi":"10.3138/w706-5884-kg84-j282","title":"The Importance of Resubmitting Rejected Papers","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Field (mathematics); Computer science; Operations research; Epistemology; Philosophy; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.4140064352683033,"score_gpt":0.5204434567997827,"score_spread":0.10643702153147938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019123976","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9469306,0.004039951,0.0012557391,0.008049048,0.001221162,0.000082277875,0.00000346729,0.0000072429393,0.038410548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950808,0.00022684586,0.003136171,0.00028342285,0.0003576166,2.5998966e-7,2.5201942e-7,0.000009636539,0.0009049374],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9750778,0.0004009043,0.0029878377,0.0003440744,0.020427793,0.000761552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9333174,0.025870768,0.0045550643,0.0010192343,0.034431573,0.0008059467],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2677449,0.00010881426,0.00032903056,0.028122317,0.0005495089,0.070878364,0.005824361,0.00017499967,0.000074374286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.57502997,0.000057476533,0.0002800017,0.11822224,0.0001732415,0.04199186,0.0006084934,0.0020406027,0.0000060992684],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008881354,0.000042439566,0.751161,0.0000023128691,0.000031841224,0.000055834393,0.00020640466,0.00000905634,0.008232927,0.0021824595,0.021650689,0.21633625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005766887,0.00018814279,0.8536939,0.000036886762,0.000007833602,0.00009493571,0.004056065,0.00007243729,0.002106682,0.008841942,0.13021736,0.00010713891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026025109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041819723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3072851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017884397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047816764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019929437","doi":"10.3138/jsp.45.3.002","title":"Will the <i>Annual Bibliography of France History</i> Survive the ‘New Technologies’ Turn?: A Last Attempt to Enter the Twenty-First Century","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); History; History of technology; Bibliography; Classics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Archaeology; Economics","score_opus":0.04168863143206997,"score_gpt":0.3078341207138352,"score_spread":0.26614548928176524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019929437","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3354029,0.014682572,0.008165033,0.62374395,0.0059863306,0.0007815033,0.00005269216,0.00007592461,0.011109068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99027014,0.0016671169,0.00043613606,0.0058576018,0.0008765891,0.0000069269277,3.1417403e-7,0.000019184614,0.00086600095],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98930347,0.00097490306,0.0014570538,0.00048559927,0.0070898905,0.00068909104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98729825,0.005287248,0.0018232993,0.0013779219,0.0038602073,0.0003531021],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.042383444,0.0002430648,0.0004695262,0.0063939984,0.0008409403,0.016482843,0.013644145,0.00022809223,0.00009849326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03893703,0.00009427988,0.00051338744,0.019258738,0.00092659076,0.050141145,0.0012066716,0.004214513,0.000028592234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004302077,0.00003507114,0.070961416,0.0000035204444,0.000036914622,0.0000035607961,0.0034691214,0.000104177714,0.0006251244,0.001236229,0.9078334,0.015648475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003365072,0.00014294096,0.055644237,0.00010094269,0.000013900458,0.000038583785,0.010423875,0.000036266738,0.00013121619,0.006339081,0.92667246,0.00012001459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002223812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013089336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65486723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000079778205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002990255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020711271","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.2.186","title":"Deborah Blum, Mary Knudson, and Robin Marantz Henig, eds. <i>A Field Guide for Science Writers</i>, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. Pp. xiv, 321. Paper: ISBN-13 978-0-19-517499-1, US$18.95","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Field (mathematics); Media studies; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0465828240388838,"score_gpt":0.2349622098891551,"score_spread":0.18837938585027128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020711271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5113384,0.14190713,0.0029757814,0.10966555,0.006622798,0.0018035807,0.00048076385,0.00053930114,0.22466668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74329144,0.054724094,0.041056357,0.02386018,0.010264827,0.0000190197,0.00020174321,0.00030201324,0.12628034],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99591094,0.00031078307,0.0010869076,0.0005438468,0.0013531552,0.0007943503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99392974,0.0007028144,0.0011052366,0.0008138951,0.0026379914,0.00081030297],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059010643,0.0003909488,0.00058415835,0.0005593938,0.003137162,0.04464963,0.003312753,0.00032446862,0.00027113274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049104462,0.0003703158,0.00030350013,0.00040974622,0.0005280866,0.14403658,0.0006503169,0.002679152,0.000003144857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020583617,0.00012554249,0.0056072874,0.000045906243,0.000097049815,0.00004196268,0.0046096887,0.000027142361,0.0006859347,0.00856292,0.97174007,0.008250674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019037524,0.00023616603,0.0027257358,0.00023094268,0.00010403066,0.00019752525,0.002346114,0.00012294449,0.000080254256,0.0008319442,0.9907858,0.0004348257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041824635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064554054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23195302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034469244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014540091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020978367","doi":"10.1353/scp.2011.0034","title":"Academic Publishing in a Global Context: The Politics and Practices of Publishing in English (review)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Politics; Context (archaeology); Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Public relations; History; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.11590768250995931,"score_gpt":0.3098165780157401,"score_spread":0.19390889550578078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020978367","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70947075,0.121423505,0.00001608994,0.052635767,0.0019536244,0.00055416825,0.00006451508,0.00006313803,0.11381846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882161,0.0062400224,0.00046732285,0.003934402,0.00092915335,0.000012846946,0.000013220652,0.000029638686,0.00015730814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99312395,0.0015683429,0.002681679,0.00034739464,0.0016292516,0.00064937945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865268,0.0016455391,0.0055969534,0.0007300962,0.005174245,0.00032639073],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0324745,0.00031848333,0.00089672825,0.00093613117,0.00037347514,0.08103268,0.0041249203,0.00044872166,0.00010829717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13943054,0.00023399743,0.00021693717,0.00082218024,0.000356225,0.43264994,0.00076055684,0.009257468,0.000001133458],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018725035,0.00038804393,0.31152567,0.00051574665,0.00019281103,0.000053675667,0.15485585,0.0000038306384,0.000028715855,0.43973455,0.060307167,0.032206696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0061392947,0.00040338445,0.24176559,0.012731459,0.00037569948,0.0003173339,0.17931058,0.00012994929,0.000034300236,0.06911206,0.48865947,0.0010208824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008793745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005766026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4283523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039510924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069008814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021837714","doi":"10.3138/jsp.34.1.31","title":"Unfair Use: Advice to Unwitting Authors","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Permission; Legal advice; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Political science; Programming language","score_opus":0.07097061969679634,"score_gpt":0.22883498437066885,"score_spread":0.1578643646738725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021837714","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63510597,0.0007952984,0.0015054239,0.057042804,0.0039160266,0.00027539066,0.0000016928117,0.00026988747,0.3010875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768137,0.000014325309,0.002183699,0.011674152,0.003698908,0.0000015147095,0.0000014525683,0.000043721084,0.0055685784],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750906,0.00003291295,0.0008050645,0.00024353385,0.0009838653,0.0004255638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99611247,0.00015625505,0.0006591444,0.00024154692,0.002733552,0.00009701214],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027682222,0.00020673515,0.000305823,0.0010425465,0.00038453224,0.070208915,0.0010513986,0.00015969443,0.0035024427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017693086,0.00015488459,0.00018345566,0.0015314732,0.000023539818,0.22081333,0.00036676222,0.0016532936,0.0005144201],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047469326,0.00007847751,0.009191127,0.00003615699,0.000048771708,0.00004073548,0.00044424488,0.000036152716,0.0010072639,0.0010475264,0.9562143,0.03180777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048537346,0.00005312236,0.00482288,0.00026129035,0.000054669334,0.000046809073,0.00051319995,0.008116416,0.00005892153,0.00085876574,0.98443997,0.00028856457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037166546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034322835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34170768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000111117806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027732734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022095654","doi":"10.3138/jsp.38.1.1","title":"Plagiarism, Publishing, and the Academy","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Misconduct; Public relations; Ambivalence; Order (exchange); Dishonesty; Identity (music); Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Academic dishonesty; Political science; Media studies; Law; Business; Psychology; Higher education; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03540922971001967,"score_gpt":0.2296023244091336,"score_spread":0.19419309469911394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022095654","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31079933,0.016588101,0.00024105729,0.34603727,0.0019062445,0.00025971653,0.00002507892,0.00013007905,0.32401314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98730564,0.00016856058,0.0006475208,0.0037839587,0.0039278716,0.000005113503,0.00001249194,0.000031434345,0.0041174185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99631524,0.00069434056,0.0011037975,0.00020540778,0.0013115265,0.00036969272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951562,0.0010048546,0.0013341693,0.00036827024,0.0019590706,0.00017739307],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01637345,0.00021147665,0.00039313827,0.0005451278,0.0012599401,0.34743407,0.0025299115,0.0003339377,0.0001429017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009468933,0.00013268548,0.00020596011,0.0002170285,0.0005603997,0.32591507,0.00040964264,0.0070344247,0.0000066885523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008389732,0.000049102302,0.0021672244,0.000009564217,0.000060280065,0.0000050565995,0.007238301,0.000008686835,0.000040347364,0.74168026,0.24297874,0.0056785704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026522782,0.000040697236,0.007536637,0.00009541282,0.00007974182,0.00012159255,0.0040318714,0.00009168047,0.000016618424,0.10823867,0.87690103,0.0001937663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014977395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024549227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6765063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011028035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000153949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988747},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2022284582","doi":"10.3138/jsp.41.2.216","title":"Observations on an Emergent Specialization","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Cultural history; Politics; Sociology; Contemporary history; Cultural studies; Comparative historical research; History; History of science; Social history (medicine); Social science; Anthropology; Aesthetics; Media studies; Political science; Epistemology; Art; Law","score_opus":0.09026675354562619,"score_gpt":0.2559098400656246,"score_spread":0.16564308651999843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022284582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71397257,0.0003705521,0.00017444308,0.27231836,0.0012584612,0.000050521685,0.0000049285986,0.000028386135,0.011821767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98272747,0.00030375124,0.00039383394,0.004417406,0.006294939,6.784259e-7,0.000013301652,0.000008572483,0.0058400244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872226,0.00006145067,0.00042237688,0.000090434165,0.0005734113,0.00013005534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979623,0.000023562625,0.0003331515,0.00008333563,0.0014689065,0.00012872204],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006077475,0.00008485744,0.00017950598,0.0001294244,0.0018017067,0.010142431,0.0002914172,0.00004774185,0.00043071547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007241812,0.000058059682,0.00015887326,0.00013135368,0.000022944732,0.03171133,0.000013059916,0.00047939873,0.000007049495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003583472,0.00042716434,0.0015769482,0.0000044092385,0.00013250658,0.000016138541,0.09926732,0.00022144085,0.0003018841,0.6728045,0.20371902,0.021492876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025809213,0.00046584013,0.010740711,0.000030098594,0.00007472492,0.0000017070242,0.0073112682,0.000032217784,0.0000048407323,0.02078717,0.9601493,0.00014403848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008086929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002393029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75643027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021113572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022863964","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44-4-006","title":"Auditing Social Science and Humanities Journals: The View of an Editor in a Malaysian Research University","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Expert finding and Q&A systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Publishing; Publication; Audit; Library science; Order (exchange); Work (physics); Political science; Social science; Public relations; Sociology; Computer science; Accounting; Business; Engineering; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.08815774113585703,"score_gpt":0.3181193552671191,"score_spread":0.22996161413126207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022863964","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9803828,0.000729879,0.0007068395,0.012391266,0.0014444606,0.00012743653,0.0000010125888,0.000012728349,0.004203559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955456,0.0000378121,0.0019862088,0.0001178211,0.0022391572,5.6122724e-7,5.168766e-8,0.000005028876,0.00006772133],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99613565,0.0007124659,0.0004718098,0.0001873305,0.0021182632,0.0003744711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99479014,0.0003638266,0.0005793591,0.00021698163,0.0038981352,0.00015157762],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026257826,0.00008124562,0.00021662939,0.0011808266,0.0011436737,0.029005295,0.003078739,0.000087891465,0.000006900366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033456676,0.000058664613,0.000046395293,0.0017810229,0.00036671196,0.11117275,0.00056266907,0.0018632488,0.0000012444293],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055239,0.00058362045,0.0712124,0.0003135868,0.00014713961,0.00035624587,0.25744137,0.00005146,0.0680867,0.21050988,0.09283656,0.2984058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032991234,0.0013184807,0.58925164,0.0036289382,0.000026926336,0.0013622945,0.25738612,0.011192056,0.0014914544,0.019947432,0.11019833,0.00089718495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037744473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025939387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5180392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002805934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005901407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9720027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023672490","doi":"10.3138/jsp.33.1.11","title":"Are the Best Higher Education Journals Really the Best? A Meta-Analysis of Writing Quality and Readability","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Higher Education Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Readability; Publication; Mandate; Quality (philosophy); Computer science; Meta-analysis; Function (biology); Work (physics); Political science; Advertising; Medicine; Business; Engineering; Biology","score_opus":0.21832808093807748,"score_gpt":0.42565056612358093,"score_spread":0.20732248518550345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023672490","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7465953,0.011949666,0.000055623517,0.23392549,0.00047999131,0.00013726343,0.0000113746155,0.000005583357,0.0068396945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916312,0.0009727298,0.0007936958,0.00344801,0.00067019684,0.000007751556,9.5199096e-7,0.0000070458664,0.0024684013],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99503297,0.0013789475,0.0012509628,0.00018026933,0.0019146163,0.00024221097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904449,0.0011012021,0.0035434563,0.00032962408,0.004377541,0.00020330668],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02500457,0.00012225287,0.0005850765,0.00028501474,0.0009601726,0.009246406,0.0008954842,0.00012861915,0.0004124764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007185697,0.00006741017,0.00049512886,0.0017125888,0.00019836532,0.01897829,0.00007429551,0.0010051021,0.0000021078183],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032019616,0.00041535118,0.94336,0.000014255891,0.013050763,0.000003569555,0.01734961,0.0000459127,0.00006270518,0.009201233,0.0072979107,0.0091666905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083486084,0.000016764154,0.8466869,0.00003627313,0.010914134,0.000008259962,0.05456581,7.134497e-7,0.000005370087,0.00478661,0.08279184,0.00010381882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043344423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012501305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2450359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002392263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011564313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99474275},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"meta_analysis","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"meta_analysis","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2023950493","doi":"10.1353/scp.2007.0018","title":"Handoff, Dropkick, or Hail Mary Pass: Letting Go of an Academic Journal: The Council of Editors of Learned Journals (CELJ) Keynote Address MLA Convention 2005","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Multidisciplinary Warburg-centric Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Obligation; Documentation; Transition (genetics); Period (music); Sociology; Operations research; Political science; Public relations; Media studies; Management; Law; Computer science; Engineering; Art; Economics; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.1650559797660734,"score_gpt":0.390336648401537,"score_spread":0.2252806686354636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023950493","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96292144,0.011741298,0.0010004216,0.013312902,0.0071268007,0.0003683371,0.00002110907,0.00002383397,0.0034838384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766062,0.0051927306,0.0021443304,0.00020529151,0.013691461,0.0000018019759,0.0000017477977,0.000056363697,0.0021000942],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870768,0.0015932888,0.003513969,0.00027450043,0.0066387006,0.0009027405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97913665,0.0024276744,0.008400514,0.00031991114,0.009157173,0.0005580736],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07701571,0.00028984627,0.00097646075,0.00077504443,0.001368688,0.0031702,0.0021689108,0.0005486262,0.00022887118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04154594,0.00019647712,0.0005153756,0.0013619167,0.0007388136,0.036950637,0.00033997846,0.0046785492,0.0000015269188],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0070942463,0.0018641931,0.266976,0.00065962126,0.0031344173,0.00067725644,0.24688697,0.0014267524,0.06695222,0.00088234263,0.23264435,0.17080162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01517276,0.0021401413,0.19869134,0.008292211,0.0016106083,0.0010183499,0.33719483,0.00037171063,0.0076242764,0.0058534895,0.42064974,0.0013805644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004971807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003291502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18800537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014406175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004382972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026032025","doi":"10.3138/jsp.32.2.91","title":"Adventures in Reprint Rights","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; League; Adventure; Series (stratigraphy); League table; Work (physics); Operations research; History; Economics; Art history; Engineering; Classical economics; Physics","score_opus":0.01960275470852223,"score_gpt":0.22378098137734925,"score_spread":0.204178226668827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026032025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84259784,0.0006954145,0.013948337,0.012943121,0.0009024511,0.00006537333,1.4783598e-7,0.000056813147,0.12879048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98370045,0.000035403784,0.013345047,0.00071113143,0.0001983972,8.8450383e-7,2.3035162e-7,0.000004165225,0.0020042583],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983987,0.00006704589,0.0005051405,0.0001576451,0.00067765126,0.00019382272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989294,0.00009893377,0.00030940492,0.00018704605,0.00031776167,0.00015746035],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013915972,0.000083070445,0.00014585003,0.00076464086,0.00010100947,0.03346168,0.001431021,0.000076964854,0.000030334257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00101031,0.000063956,0.00007896657,0.0012191482,0.000011478476,0.17617658,0.00027765258,0.0007328518,0.0000075600888],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015954828,0.0004626985,0.63406813,0.000016102918,0.00010032034,0.0021945913,0.005361196,0.0006309136,0.0005454342,0.13208449,0.07333043,0.15104616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010735856,0.000102725986,0.25732774,0.0001347482,0.0000023297596,0.0006165062,0.00012802565,0.00038679046,0.0006519712,0.10117703,0.6381816,0.00021695152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020654448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010407215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56485116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000089599795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016754516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9675417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026217450","doi":"10.3138/jsp.32.1.3","title":"Fair Use: A Double-Edged Sword","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"SWORD; Fair use; Publication; Assertion; Publishing; Mandate; Law and economics; Fair dealing; Law; Intellectual property; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Computer science; Good faith","score_opus":0.05835238118714468,"score_gpt":0.22846073586912044,"score_spread":0.17010835468197577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026217450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6798269,0.0005350267,0.00022441009,0.009614638,0.0010886933,0.00013665942,7.884562e-7,0.00009274336,0.30848014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818485,0.000050100836,0.00050510006,0.0053499094,0.0044002915,0.0000016567585,0.00000447176,0.00003800908,0.0078020026],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977753,0.000022421578,0.00073320017,0.0002141404,0.00088404893,0.00037087558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972063,0.00008372151,0.0004805687,0.00024681317,0.0019263806,0.000056256657],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020811718,0.00020375114,0.00031813644,0.0006262889,0.00033714413,0.084658846,0.0010283221,0.0001698259,0.0134142935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019934254,0.00014516224,0.0002320686,0.00095608534,0.000043290234,0.28708062,0.00015132653,0.0016659214,0.0005104879],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008419023,0.00015893606,0.007144758,0.000048140275,0.00010580993,0.000084883926,0.0002309478,0.000024789504,0.0010846207,0.002023908,0.85292095,0.13533036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016906497,0.000037798367,0.0063106488,0.00015841449,0.00006157208,0.000052180607,0.00014183947,0.0012358794,0.0001012115,0.0022957784,0.9876641,0.00024994306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004283389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034994457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30202156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008170652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000818228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98748755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026546101","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44.1.36","title":"The Church and Peer Review: Was ‘Peer’ Review Fairer, More Honest Then Than Now?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Medical Research Council","keywords":"Presumption; Scholarship; Publication; Wish; Publishing; Law; Vernacular; Peer review; Sociology; Public relations; Law and economics; Political science; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.055852656879060686,"score_gpt":0.3479680553822506,"score_spread":0.2921153985031899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026546101","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015955078,0.41812873,0.0000689885,0.48360026,0.0009375974,0.00016007069,0.000012795231,0.000016765945,0.095479265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33440033,0.57717097,0.0012466012,0.032695223,0.007378124,0.000011834802,0.00001662203,0.000034258657,0.047046054],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99506056,0.0005595758,0.00057853624,0.000117100746,0.0031859558,0.0004982568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931857,0.0009027474,0.0005138116,0.00019825214,0.0046836734,0.00051579694],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.025901169,0.00013604066,0.00033090037,0.00007051621,0.001245986,0.009024534,0.00087686995,0.00011563094,0.00010041075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030439641,0.00008495464,0.00018040583,0.00042747162,0.0006084625,0.03737252,0.00010296854,0.0014084689,0.000011475628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028579436,0.00002219404,0.010017826,0.00021193929,0.000051774197,0.000007517939,0.0013484904,1.3145402e-7,0.0000064855744,0.27474856,0.70219576,0.011386471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007380191,0.000016889933,0.0077471468,0.0027463816,0.000090478316,0.00011014734,0.0013540244,3.3818276e-7,7.1432504e-7,0.0003198616,0.98742646,0.00011376607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004120922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035637582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45090505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017429446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014797843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9920042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026810360","doi":"10.3138/jsp.46.3.04","title":"Edmund Husserl's Reception in Marvin Farber's <i>Philosophy and Phenomenological Research</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenology (philosophy); Philosophy; American philosophy; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Art history; Modern philosophy; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.31325900742738283,"score_gpt":0.3983936965729205,"score_spread":0.08513468914553768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026810360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54957956,0.0065691248,0.000052390667,0.036054503,0.0017135974,0.00017798791,0.00000516148,0.000030041007,0.40581763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959161,0.00009852185,0.0009608334,0.0010972632,0.001571793,0.000009218108,0.0000055035875,0.000026698157,0.00031403828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995815,0.0013505113,0.00090132735,0.00039546934,0.000906082,0.0006316304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971174,0.0003122729,0.00045049159,0.00035227864,0.0012623747,0.0005051758],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012340286,0.00019883306,0.0004547874,0.0012769648,0.00019102603,0.0041751713,0.0009671384,0.0005916959,0.0001652714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003318267,0.00017453353,0.00008506474,0.00093936175,0.00034131188,0.024072554,0.00036633693,0.004847648,0.00009386448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034990027,0.0015179473,0.07948963,0.00004970536,0.00040825387,0.001157154,0.017986106,0.000034392197,0.0010107101,0.81161636,0.05087229,0.032358468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041235243,0.001543855,0.028669026,0.00012956002,0.000028252502,0.000517151,0.006492581,0.0000056444264,0.0000055903506,0.9187681,0.03943039,0.0002862956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000120582925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019977768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44633657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030125165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001591908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027662984","doi":"10.1353/scp.2011.0008","title":"Flogging a Dead Book?: Prospects for the Scholarly Book and the University Press in Australia","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Diversification (marketing strategy); Incentive; Publication; Commercialization; Face (sociological concept); Project commissioning; Scholarly communication; Media studies; Sociology; Library science; Management; Political science; Social science; Law; Economics; Business; Marketing","score_opus":0.09801996760654007,"score_gpt":0.24329288565824658,"score_spread":0.1452729180517065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027662984","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6202707,0.10615193,0.0019227848,0.11504301,0.005001767,0.003669738,0.00010323506,0.00023645577,0.14760035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847117,0.0008066602,0.0009338419,0.0015673795,0.0006888269,0.000009922198,0.0000028535494,0.000026179074,0.011252604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790233,0.0004802826,0.0005590012,0.00018895269,0.00053731626,0.00033210477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964664,0.0008089189,0.00067749596,0.0004488647,0.0014698164,0.00012851997],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00934385,0.00017287249,0.00028973958,0.00030279314,0.001296967,0.060165565,0.0021299764,0.0001376432,0.000080255515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003975305,0.00010413311,0.00016692256,0.0001251671,0.00039199766,0.18772115,0.00029692813,0.0030178074,0.0000016056142],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089164334,0.00013840989,0.006668805,0.00004790572,0.00023928826,0.000024691504,0.10364124,0.000010222212,0.000057072826,0.79798776,0.08762166,0.0026712879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003917242,0.0001373305,0.017972274,0.00023092105,0.0001555484,0.000051338367,0.013344863,0.00019461133,0.000031883326,0.008152825,0.9555893,0.00022189686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015054847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054373266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8679676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015608828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000138153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028001125","doi":"10.3138/jsp.41.1.56","title":"Situating Clio's Influence in Humanities and Social Science Monographs","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Discipline; Situated; Sociology; Social science; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.05504840918679268,"score_gpt":0.2635085709943094,"score_spread":0.20846016180751673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028001125","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94399774,0.0011147634,0.000008745156,0.0070331,0.00023046401,0.00005702387,0.000003506224,0.000030735468,0.047523916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967629,0.00006231828,0.00050930586,0.0020614674,0.00046177823,0.000001001632,0.0000021137819,0.000008499267,0.00013064852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760586,0.0001660788,0.00074336317,0.00018068282,0.0009595964,0.0003444099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965248,0.00015643488,0.0006809282,0.00019382869,0.002361784,0.00008218772],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008091807,0.00014059278,0.00025782708,0.0015374304,0.0014015352,0.129699,0.0014495213,0.00009207218,0.00001758907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039114305,0.00012757891,0.000074591946,0.00040664675,0.00044793222,0.26078922,0.00016361086,0.0022831021,0.000001096041],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006265057,0.00021069944,0.025230765,0.000027734934,0.000028348804,0.000029150619,0.2075402,0.000019170104,0.0045154677,0.68001634,0.0031618825,0.079157576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032700442,0.0009155777,0.5900442,0.0008859381,0.00007930151,0.00016817512,0.091570586,0.00022837661,0.00024269643,0.12219029,0.18933433,0.0010704977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013376093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009930161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56481344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013299525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002183415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028731781","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0016","title":"The Alchemy of Turning Fiction into Truth","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Classical Antiquity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Indigenous; Alchemy; Politics; The Renaissance; Media studies; History; Sociology; Classics; Art history; Social science; Literature; Art; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05176656041340835,"score_gpt":0.30765712220387464,"score_spread":0.2558905617904663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028731781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9047827,0.0018135989,0.00029540499,0.062494516,0.0012962535,0.000061080835,7.267017e-7,0.000020797057,0.029234935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962151,0.0008773702,0.000873232,0.0001283422,0.0009783558,6.369631e-7,1.6287773e-7,0.0000060403904,0.00092075946],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976592,0.00025487205,0.00051200704,0.000086700406,0.0012598671,0.00022732737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964028,0.0011037441,0.0007122567,0.00009562285,0.0015573789,0.00012818436],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053831222,0.000070373026,0.00019697317,0.00012536124,0.0018141755,0.004374119,0.0006938898,0.00010985136,0.0000134802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029887863,0.000046727648,0.0001599701,0.0005105103,0.00038667535,0.027091952,0.00011900193,0.001106023,0.0000016335364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002852643,0.000394651,0.18334128,0.000051870258,0.0006314699,0.00010667517,0.23101611,0.000071943505,0.012337532,0.11716796,0.28183857,0.17275669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000619883,0.00016370822,0.06570174,0.00016107352,0.00004731273,0.00004442668,0.04525136,0.000019363973,0.00103577,0.009829258,0.8769578,0.00016834211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028658478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021068625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5951192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016813944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028799652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029125700","doi":"10.1353/scp.2007.0015","title":"Or Not: The Place of Disputation in Scholarly Communication","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Indigenous; Politics; The Renaissance; Media studies; Slavic languages; Sociology; Scholarly communication; Social science; History; Classics; Political science; Art history; Law","score_opus":0.07358306299662898,"score_gpt":0.28374933172865546,"score_spread":0.21016626873202648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029125700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94508934,0.0022580242,0.0005414253,0.024586992,0.0006733685,0.00021484555,0.000012624678,0.000030147758,0.026593234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959184,0.00016331807,0.0016826764,0.0008701143,0.0003880677,0.0000028487616,0.000014158553,0.000023240125,0.0009371677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960543,0.00069786195,0.0015554397,0.00014405845,0.0012460746,0.00030226374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921388,0.0018068289,0.0017382011,0.0007263247,0.0034658664,0.00012395959],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026457205,0.00016051903,0.00032092154,0.00086629094,0.00058570027,0.05610078,0.0027900538,0.00017999085,0.00011068045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015793888,0.00010506936,0.00014582019,0.00048470963,0.00021713779,0.21429196,0.00025847604,0.003824869,0.0000047941103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028609575,0.0010399971,0.04874118,0.00013970498,0.00030665283,0.00004840187,0.269759,0.00042039814,0.0033963644,0.53821635,0.026166776,0.108904235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0052319556,0.0007329802,0.34858662,0.001658709,0.00017426322,0.00018116833,0.1237902,0.00045882977,0.0010514979,0.01764788,0.4997466,0.0007393123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008803094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037699568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52056843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002695923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032285202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99847335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029262987","doi":"10.1353/scp.2011.0036","title":"Journal des Savants: From the Republic of Letters to the Cloud Library","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Digitization; Realm; Newspaper; Cloud computing; World Wide Web; Scarcity; Collection development; Service (business); Library science; Digital library; Computer science; Media studies; Political science; Sociology; Law; Art; Telecommunications; Business; Literature","score_opus":0.20503969410654954,"score_gpt":0.25600105344780283,"score_spread":0.05096135934125329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029262987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87737906,0.0028598008,0.022367097,0.08316003,0.0025016451,0.000107584194,0.000009111239,0.000033561355,0.011582139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95483583,0.00011056346,0.025617385,0.017444223,0.0017391341,5.693949e-7,7.501136e-7,0.00001629126,0.0002352275],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760896,0.000235036,0.00075554644,0.00015237139,0.00093501643,0.00031308818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970019,0.00032144913,0.0009070159,0.0004953056,0.0008733531,0.00040098696],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022411249,0.0001475871,0.00022881593,0.0001851011,0.00040836984,0.07418045,0.004530317,0.00007063415,0.00006136227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033505606,0.00006276357,0.00022560274,0.00080212037,0.00009455764,0.23517792,0.0006968848,0.0013946001,0.0000073281462],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013104093,0.00021963492,0.018213522,0.000008630101,0.0003627824,0.00035698002,0.05040901,0.00006705083,0.0078979805,0.030551512,0.77567863,0.11610322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013305482,0.00080581213,0.49629906,0.0008123882,0.00008109332,0.0035059245,0.003820943,0.000091563634,0.0074533136,0.098963164,0.38630268,0.0005335413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001787419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015398213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47808552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004823179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002067047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92678064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029611428","doi":"10.1353/scp.2008.0009","title":"A Different Kind of Profession: The Council of Editors of Learned Journals (CELJ) Keynote Address MLA Convention 2006","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Sociology; Legal profession; Political science; Library science; Public relations; Law; Management; Engineering ethics; Media studies; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.22528911780739236,"score_gpt":0.3937313009811818,"score_spread":0.16844218317378945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029611428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87649816,0.0011083287,0.00018426747,0.10133946,0.0060970676,0.00020212613,0.000014458122,0.000007253749,0.014548857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948237,0.00029452614,0.0002455568,0.00022030553,0.0025101341,0.0000019627123,0.0000015171611,0.000009099927,0.0018931846],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99441814,0.00089444214,0.0013084541,0.00009925769,0.0030809839,0.0001986907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838648,0.00082305213,0.0039962674,0.00018893783,0.010988848,0.00013812723],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012129813,0.00009962645,0.00033662398,0.00029823964,0.0005835417,0.0018540017,0.00079333043,0.00020655496,0.0004519541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026268423,0.00006695832,0.00019330381,0.0010108976,0.00031986402,0.029720237,0.000059716418,0.002026814,0.0000013218554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007340405,0.0023885835,0.19247599,0.00023288195,0.00066315394,0.000019979925,0.26884812,0.00010231111,0.03440302,0.024785185,0.46359313,0.011753608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024022397,0.00036784203,0.16185391,0.0012461286,0.00023256704,0.00007779057,0.06820131,0.000015974045,0.0050837277,0.0043863547,0.7558616,0.00027056353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011158519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015517868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29226846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038321695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00707875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99918216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030029972","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44.3.002","title":"Disruptive Technological History: Papermaking to Digital Printing","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Papermaking; Offset printing; Publishing; Digital printing; History of the book; Fifteenth; Printing press; History; Engineering; Visual arts; Ancient history; Art history; Computer science; Art; Political science; Mechanical engineering; Pulp and paper industry; Law; Inkwell","score_opus":0.1876598341598333,"score_gpt":0.2099603791946803,"score_spread":0.02230054503484699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030029972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.562591,0.0007909572,0.00030091178,0.01764172,0.0021593138,0.00025440915,0.000007652174,0.000184969,0.41606903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98531973,0.0000034008822,0.0008612985,0.0026939441,0.001829239,0.0000064628307,0.0000018846114,0.000026586435,0.009257435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811196,0.00004341748,0.00062506506,0.00019677242,0.00065338815,0.0003694111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978595,0.00012197793,0.00050210656,0.00018672744,0.0011004152,0.0002292803],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008422087,0.00018052652,0.0002990969,0.00042434773,0.0003137706,0.06471377,0.00089966663,0.00013236297,0.0013522591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032249377,0.00013199417,0.00016513673,0.00006867296,0.00022219722,0.15007383,0.0003462915,0.0015649764,0.00009925081],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039691786,0.00016744118,0.0075841607,0.00003676717,0.0001527012,0.00010885438,0.042139944,0.0000031024717,0.0013616437,0.64847255,0.17423119,0.12570198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024197159,0.00013128515,0.002248187,0.00012817953,0.000015759833,0.000045495635,0.012879944,0.000007300475,0.000041977288,0.010153213,0.97389716,0.00020950298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007048462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012573464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.799666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029230575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012419133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031503609","doi":"10.1353/scp.2007.0031","title":"MLA Regional Journals: Accountability, Innovation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Accounting Education and Careers","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Face (sociological concept); Duty; Accountability; Position (finance); Public relations; Scale (ratio); Political science; Business; Sociology; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.07084448638546395,"score_gpt":0.3093196440369177,"score_spread":0.23847515765145375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031503609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9298996,0.00046343228,0.0028931524,0.02318088,0.0029312402,0.00009214891,6.450673e-7,0.000045624114,0.04049332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9699541,0.000011289684,0.0010839887,0.019158712,0.009491882,8.0658384e-7,0.000009236519,0.000029742152,0.00026029474],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965128,0.00001820002,0.0012790503,0.00018459497,0.0016411798,0.00036419884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98815095,0.00019564424,0.00223445,0.00022479334,0.009152493,0.00004165359],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.016528543,0.000169873,0.00026098738,0.0022251494,0.00031648544,0.03909731,0.00096416497,0.00021044811,0.0005399321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010377379,0.00015011372,0.00014981529,0.0028454557,0.00005408788,0.1664217,0.00015354715,0.0016576309,0.000056249442],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015802542,0.00026239114,0.52248216,0.00009687196,0.00009577447,0.00002475207,0.00040285313,0.000030843083,0.0048178323,0.05094506,0.37612888,0.044554554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008501107,0.000014675969,0.3240271,0.00018646277,0.00006203376,0.0001285473,0.0048946883,0.00003038697,0.00007349091,0.012475432,0.65699303,0.00026403624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013344128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004221612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28086415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023971588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022072137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99795866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031542015","doi":"10.3138/jsp.45.2.004","title":"Recovering the Covering Letter: Submitting Manuscripts to Scholarly Journals in the Twenty-First Century","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Dialogic; Rhetorical question; History; Scholarship; Scholarly communication; Library science; Media studies; Literature; Sociology; Computer science; Art; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05985792587263002,"score_gpt":0.2455971385732016,"score_spread":0.18573921270057156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031542015","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77709955,0.0037237233,0.00012348575,0.19146831,0.002817442,0.00046789003,0.000008181846,0.00004525287,0.02424614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767079,0.00030294716,0.00068965345,0.018304287,0.003443988,0.000031374435,0.000004045398,0.000049947925,0.000465892],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941194,0.0010662777,0.0016753924,0.00030049568,0.0020837765,0.0007546808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99354476,0.0010621368,0.0013711727,0.00097143167,0.002746723,0.0003037786],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020122292,0.00032892215,0.0004406147,0.0010278287,0.0021503072,0.34822613,0.0055934447,0.00018503246,0.00033471602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012607196,0.00020179899,0.00031168296,0.0006260406,0.00010460542,0.27264732,0.0005911168,0.0075305738,0.00007439158],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014336419,0.00054424145,0.08018752,0.000119992255,0.00041370364,0.0001510102,0.273657,0.0008255249,0.003887009,0.035080668,0.5332636,0.07172631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007448976,0.0001327813,0.06973373,0.0007879087,0.000045176388,0.00017499243,0.028539611,0.00005966324,0.000029093348,0.0033840192,0.89601153,0.0003565897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001891167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00068832125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36274788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041922915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015306515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032519310","doi":"10.3138/jsp.33.4.202","title":"The Cloth-Paper Conundrum: The Economics of Simultaneous Publication","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Art History and Market Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Session (web analytics); Point (geometry); Library science; Economics; Media studies; History; Marketing; Management; Operations research; Sociology; Advertising; Computer science; Business; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03140574099259925,"score_gpt":0.19489153368765755,"score_spread":0.1634857926950583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032519310","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20433533,0.015157707,0.00015118127,0.13969511,0.0034581854,0.00028128576,0.000029382343,0.00004784284,0.636844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734419,0.00076661754,0.000079343015,0.0015810505,0.001194789,0.0000017911526,0.0000017104367,0.000014513208,0.022918267],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855685,0.00016002223,0.00070272957,0.00009120752,0.00032122375,0.0001679584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959384,0.0008727602,0.0010461743,0.0002828035,0.0017816083,0.000078217075],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002806144,0.00009617385,0.00019229348,0.0001520216,0.0010698269,0.01461966,0.0009078929,0.000060230184,0.0014460343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003024125,0.000053080654,0.0002229395,0.00007870032,0.0002721841,0.031164153,0.00006605691,0.00077506754,0.000019882333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009312221,0.00015319194,0.00040914118,0.000018337149,0.00057613914,0.0000085518,0.03961259,0.00026959743,0.00015096024,0.40392983,0.40448615,0.15029241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019236402,0.0000654564,0.000031081057,0.000012292239,0.00007958886,0.00001678335,0.0048546214,0.00088616816,0.000009485555,0.0021447428,0.9916388,0.00006861991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000060044276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040756323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76910657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008980838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005284304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034714912","doi":"10.3138/jsp.34.2.83","title":"The Power of Pink: Graphical Display as Imposed Epistemology","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Geographic Information Systems Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Graphics; Forcing (mathematics); Computer science; Obligation; Power (physics); Impression; Test (biology); Epistemology; Computer graphics (images); Law; World Wide Web; Philosophy; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.019714609333857592,"score_gpt":0.28777210805488346,"score_spread":0.26805749872102586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034714912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80629057,0.0020367457,0.00019196671,0.024002412,0.0027163548,0.00019740462,0.0000025422237,0.000018386881,0.16454361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99861026,0.00020998143,0.00026139896,0.00036007652,0.00013631793,0.0000021282215,2.282811e-7,0.0000065072068,0.00041312183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99613714,0.00079126615,0.0010939793,0.00009190886,0.0015064095,0.00037929325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99428874,0.0009123394,0.001382638,0.0001931801,0.0030357118,0.00018736682],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017442375,0.00010461354,0.00029921072,0.00036715812,0.0012596255,0.0064894836,0.0008659613,0.0002251655,0.00004236182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021847581,0.00006806241,0.00025024623,0.0009503307,0.00048073597,0.024761098,0.000063125975,0.0010896749,0.000006910085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034639364,0.00003959789,0.12078413,0.000010840371,0.00018248559,0.000012603678,0.026593035,0.0000030594183,0.000115361574,0.84635067,0.0053103706,0.00056319975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001152631,0.0002926571,0.10383953,0.00013348756,0.000050478382,0.00021740928,0.1140787,0.0000011181219,0.0000637181,0.047164023,0.7327842,0.00022200782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035922052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002116051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79918665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007916809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042764805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9945419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034759026","doi":"10.1353/scp.2012.0017","title":"A Short Note on Short Notes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; History","score_opus":0.11564273958522492,"score_gpt":0.27643321926706604,"score_spread":0.16079047968184113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034759026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5713894,0.0015143334,0.00015234132,0.011401473,0.006121083,0.00008356231,0.0000136216495,0.00004835145,0.40927586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909042,0.000011586349,0.0004274686,0.0019517699,0.006174759,0.0000010092829,0.0000011007935,0.000014424374,0.0005136829],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979725,0.000058344067,0.00045427238,0.00012295552,0.0010336717,0.0003582804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984192,0.00016740234,0.00018408654,0.0001765496,0.00071127934,0.000341448],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030325789,0.00013907115,0.00022553746,0.00042812098,0.00063785294,0.013943223,0.0007600703,0.00008469531,0.00030189846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014443215,0.00010893202,0.0001733704,0.00008453179,0.00020476163,0.10605653,0.000063666135,0.0014328182,0.00004659255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001915302,0.0008163634,0.017065534,0.00004210717,0.00012811484,0.00007900973,0.078992344,0.000026059004,0.004430244,0.7283967,0.061116625,0.108715355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000207335,0.00032195807,0.008825375,0.00015680837,0.000049381564,0.00008687022,0.0013532211,0.000010195769,0.0003547158,0.006100479,0.98224825,0.00028539158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021544454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019982606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9211317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001560383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007678369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9870804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035603363","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0073","title":"The International Publication Productivity of Malaysia in Social Sciences: Developing a Scientific Power Index","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation index; Index (typography); Social Sciences Citation Index; Productivity; Science Citation Index; Impact factor; Social science; Citation; Power (physics); Political science; Sociology; Regional science; Economics; Economic growth; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.4639904991995301,"score_gpt":0.5221175649609832,"score_spread":0.058127065761453045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035603363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90157634,0.00036841264,0.0021267436,0.08831879,0.001374493,0.00010902847,0.0000036247147,0.0000045531474,0.0061180396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99741405,0.000018360643,0.0017254187,0.00025177904,0.00021940975,0.0000010151152,6.257294e-7,0.0000034623388,0.00036589862],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98091257,0.00036787972,0.0015776794,0.00046674747,0.016202705,0.0004724494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9700954,0.0019459747,0.0019124016,0.0003708713,0.025521854,0.00015351974],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16317508,0.00009988774,0.00025342163,0.04497375,0.0009211279,0.16472296,0.007345763,0.00012384883,0.000045053534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25445592,0.000059992704,0.00014724827,0.13134773,0.00039078074,0.079577655,0.0005637381,0.001197356,0.0000059177924],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007117504,0.00024680098,0.70282465,0.000002172524,0.000020391532,0.000007734437,0.00088043505,0.00008905418,0.005903311,0.036387283,0.04784063,0.20572639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004674308,0.000113978065,0.8971374,0.000029865592,0.0000020168097,0.000033580545,0.0011890867,0.0010369961,0.0006427379,0.055719476,0.043519035,0.00010839676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014044858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009099108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.205618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003995167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017136699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035628952","doi":"10.3138/jsp.45.2.005","title":"Disruptive Conclusions: The Future of Australian Educational Publishing","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Reading (process); Multinational corporation; Electronic publishing; Distribution (mathematics); Advertising; Sociology; Psychology; World Wide Web; The Internet; Computer science; Business; Political science; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.041021499792735304,"score_gpt":0.26408695223464224,"score_spread":0.22306545244190693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035628952","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33790854,0.0045266137,0.00003175997,0.58343214,0.0041070017,0.0003281503,0.000051002917,0.00003683556,0.06957798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859001,0.00012454987,0.0011122228,0.0018326358,0.0053678686,0.00001421659,0.000036461446,0.000027515067,0.005584443],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99630576,0.00054420717,0.001199284,0.00018416648,0.0014228192,0.0003437538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98855823,0.0009333483,0.0018370162,0.0006275883,0.0077786907,0.0002651176],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005812104,0.00020857235,0.00035874321,0.00052770623,0.0011156424,0.14799982,0.0034174726,0.00021490535,0.002025904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077419975,0.00013378297,0.0002778032,0.0003309815,0.00031243498,0.30851263,0.00042335395,0.00390606,0.000023623668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020480353,0.00018551125,0.005826704,0.000023265218,0.00016153514,0.0000017237506,0.03999165,0.000011121431,0.00037567524,0.42678553,0.50677246,0.019844366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006403464,0.00012789883,0.030898422,0.0002579807,0.00007036824,0.00006303194,0.07414317,0.00002551141,0.00003886895,0.05687616,0.8366238,0.00023442882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009895897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002054458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64799154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018667243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005682302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035630854","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0079","title":"Judging Journal Prices: A Cost Index for Academic Journals","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Economics; Business; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.09925764170531497,"score_gpt":0.3165935695281464,"score_spread":0.2173359278228314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035630854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8626355,0.0057054088,0.009075487,0.0760611,0.016177526,0.00062480825,0.00005845643,0.00013202416,0.02952972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97926784,0.00032458737,0.0051009716,0.0021824923,0.011949104,0.000011381814,0.000008523763,0.00006875534,0.0010863265],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99525976,0.00026822367,0.0019182609,0.00022384424,0.0016731942,0.0006567387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859827,0.00090717967,0.0033669712,0.00048358028,0.008584995,0.0006745564],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.023327963,0.00028891934,0.0005372028,0.0017065853,0.0021319936,0.19869557,0.003855405,0.00047878767,0.00049583404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022398263,0.00023366735,0.0004766016,0.00028341054,0.00017909716,0.26277012,0.00024102845,0.017240096,0.0000086996915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006359891,0.0005785178,0.049433548,0.00014291043,0.0009297849,0.00011867738,0.080666795,0.00013312316,0.021263812,0.22367291,0.38286442,0.23955952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020599782,0.00017597624,0.0051128846,0.0004163967,0.000114316994,0.0014469487,0.006562672,0.00023122833,0.000092197115,0.03150918,0.9519124,0.00036581358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000041541698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014070333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.569048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021292135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008359457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991671},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2035895300","doi":"10.3138/jsp.45.4.01","title":"Open Access Goals Revisited: How Green and Gold Open Access Are Meeting (or Not) Their Original Goals","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Hungarian Social, Economic and Educational Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Business; Profit (economics); Political science; Public relations; Economics","score_opus":0.21036141902765151,"score_gpt":0.42778317089579515,"score_spread":0.21742175186814364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035895300","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54147345,0.0015989832,0.00014773358,0.3222941,0.001470155,0.00084400625,0.00005101897,0.000035861423,0.13208468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773881,0.0011715754,0.0012656626,0.006406818,0.005372961,0.000021333823,0.0000066637617,0.000036752364,0.008330134],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966516,0.0009386439,0.00076047727,0.0004077742,0.0007158744,0.00052562216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994266,0.0012281556,0.0021335809,0.000234823,0.0016299408,0.00050751114],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01712667,0.00022814369,0.0007917591,0.00025882424,0.0019387013,0.29879415,0.010635503,0.00022794737,0.00027177582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017144512,0.00017884908,0.00012139895,0.0006682952,0.00021273775,0.23606144,0.0045914804,0.0011215389,0.000008092608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024766242,0.00010781693,0.6384382,0.000076172895,0.00040249297,0.000017071363,0.015527635,0.000005645205,0.000067623965,0.024912504,0.2823279,0.037869263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008633751,0.000049619295,0.20934753,0.00055733934,0.00006408008,0.000015557413,0.022889521,0.000004258299,0.000022309167,0.0093092,0.75654095,0.00033627852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008151031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025485058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47421303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046141745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001191641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040688521","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0063","title":"Situating Clio's Influence in Humanities and Social Science Monographs: Disciplinary Affiliations and Historical Scholarship","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Discipline; Situated; Sociology; Social science; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.16875888157502525,"score_gpt":0.4015707868175363,"score_spread":0.23281190524251102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040688521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9753768,0.0008933347,0.00019863121,0.021224396,0.00017070227,0.00008990224,0.0000037156692,0.000009573513,0.002032989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979278,0.000024352257,0.0012810258,0.00034673364,0.00024128114,0.0000017147656,6.382658e-7,0.000004810869,0.0001716848],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949483,0.00033018916,0.0010338147,0.00034816266,0.0029597937,0.00037969582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942894,0.000588789,0.00066039845,0.00017529848,0.0041045705,0.0001815244],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018846096,0.00012931201,0.00029476592,0.0025126513,0.0014602912,0.048251845,0.0011663205,0.000121382705,0.0000071638087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018931368,0.00010282752,0.00006449039,0.0030546782,0.00029153455,0.14453503,0.0004163805,0.0016271181,0.0000013491608],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060206174,0.00044024023,0.72339004,0.000026231943,0.000026580075,0.00022032356,0.04800661,0.00017897952,0.03606696,0.045549355,0.007185357,0.13830724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005826382,0.000530491,0.89901567,0.00009316386,0.000006755854,0.00007772322,0.010862689,0.00029711006,0.000077510536,0.08716659,0.0011329754,0.00015670608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000807047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006148967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17562559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004550528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046738895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041042778","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44-4-007","title":"The Status of Peer-Reviewed Research in Sports and Recreation Management: A Critique of Current Practices","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Sports, Gender, and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Recreation; Sport management; Public relations; Peer review; Sociology; Process (computing); Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.1629751982567603,"score_gpt":0.4455650587573462,"score_spread":0.2825898605005859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041042778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93062025,0.023217138,0.000031148746,0.021929996,0.00047272217,0.0004597949,0.0000017020949,0.0000047823987,0.023262437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9146046,0.08338449,0.0009967753,0.00005242976,0.0002075451,0.00000778009,0.0000011030615,0.0000066783464,0.0007385839],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99571556,0.0007814058,0.00072367315,0.00012461116,0.0022595385,0.00039523919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99345195,0.0006293944,0.001387293,0.0001471886,0.004185458,0.00019872407],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.030509796,0.00006335797,0.00020623382,0.00026269024,0.00036003414,0.0050280215,0.00043707681,0.00009913549,0.000046429228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014854252,0.000046276647,0.0000749997,0.00075790886,0.00022244125,0.029639544,0.0000905902,0.0011793274,2.9507763e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053917003,0.00024999763,0.45917505,0.000345242,0.000080511614,0.000016178803,0.11761063,0.0000030246315,0.00012300395,0.041241813,0.034058627,0.347042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040052435,0.000057477624,0.30330727,0.0006398449,0.00003104138,0.000003666337,0.3186777,0.000006906418,0.00001575227,0.013106792,0.36367825,0.000074802076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004730868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005682038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3469672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018357227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005020127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041807538","doi":"10.3138/jsp.43.1.76","title":"Exploring How Library Publishing Services Facilitate Scholarly Communication","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Publishing; Digitization; Certification; Promotion (chess); Function (biology); Electronic publishing; Popularity; Public relations; Library science; World Wide Web; Business; Computer science; Political science; Management; Economics; Telecommunications; The Internet","score_opus":0.8332413547542352,"score_gpt":0.4585807703599362,"score_spread":0.374660584394299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041807538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9196535,0.0065144957,0.0016938978,0.030171245,0.0016482468,0.00019040123,0.00004043702,0.0000806625,0.040007144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97236353,0.0016922802,0.023080993,0.0008786,0.00039950755,0.000007519837,0.000008396538,0.00004008162,0.0015290905],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9773672,0.0014770449,0.0020719927,0.0007010691,0.017441455,0.00094119145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9658629,0.004557964,0.002786401,0.0019170523,0.023316922,0.0015587963],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09545518,0.00029904212,0.00064070255,0.065138854,0.00087995344,0.65290785,0.018064095,0.00036381843,0.000521694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16633968,0.000218845,0.0004391616,0.099750094,0.00015512231,0.84893614,0.0035872883,0.0056363414,0.00008528974],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001631773,0.000321595,0.5909682,0.00004165701,0.0001454709,0.00013703849,0.010723228,0.000015053662,0.001524055,0.005713944,0.049638446,0.34060812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017627404,0.0004675554,0.61180246,0.0003356434,0.000037409893,0.00020671648,0.033359632,0.00044875103,0.0019857965,0.056865834,0.2921011,0.00062638253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028847126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017557226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33998173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022550712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006016698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99665767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042548985","doi":"10.3138/jsp.34.1.4","title":"The Electronic Muse: The Council of Editors of Learned Journals Keynote Addresses, MLA Convention 2001","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Convention; Poetry; Newspaper; Intellectual property; Law; Electronic publishing; Sociology; The Internet; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.1186365098118421,"score_gpt":0.2497374497769946,"score_spread":0.1311009399651525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042548985","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5349663,0.058695972,0.0013765813,0.12558827,0.01760452,0.0009597508,0.00000876924,0.00009744064,0.26070243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875383,0.0017013588,0.000021150998,0.0006419936,0.007821124,0.0000016964402,0.0000010477884,0.000027021684,0.0022463307],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959256,0.00010829159,0.0011896447,0.00014668224,0.0021720142,0.00045778425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896449,0.0004290509,0.0023921912,0.00030694934,0.007191525,0.00003539778],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011388937,0.00017929012,0.00035396253,0.00031995506,0.0005453434,0.013630716,0.0014901859,0.00014948584,0.00247748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016686436,0.000091563175,0.0003160512,0.001011775,0.00014890646,0.047450587,0.00019320387,0.002008559,0.000027359],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020366441,0.00013902408,0.0010121414,0.00006713018,0.00023024519,0.0000053410604,0.000492745,0.000032832268,0.0033470506,0.0012782968,0.9719977,0.021193838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000900666,0.000107577696,0.0011029022,0.0002704197,0.00015317257,0.000029459174,0.0007210796,0.0030173406,0.0005195539,0.0041941055,0.9888438,0.00013994561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037342147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011308854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45257202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003237413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048854656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99843436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043218499","doi":"10.1353/scp.2012.0015","title":"How to Publish Your PhD: A Practical Guide for the Humanities and Social Sciences , and: Publishing from Your PhD: Negotiating a Crowded Jungle (review)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Jungle; Publication; Negotiation; Library science; Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Social science; History; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.26658757706751196,"score_gpt":0.34146513506040005,"score_spread":0.07487755799288809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043218499","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16823535,0.18401647,0.002146501,0.6179245,0.0052146856,0.0013281512,0.00029846057,0.00020036001,0.020635499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9225438,0.0022333385,0.02069219,0.034718547,0.015692139,0.00008766149,0.000083777704,0.00013035734,0.0038181497],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995321,0.0006426117,0.0011504786,0.00039272665,0.0016361332,0.00085705833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914325,0.0025726224,0.0017112846,0.00043136155,0.0035682558,0.00028401345],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.019691411,0.00036636242,0.00063600886,0.0006210317,0.0050542555,0.43114722,0.0021771796,0.00023822092,0.000057492212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049013726,0.00026284633,0.00022952861,0.00032403285,0.0005003483,0.3757762,0.00088593207,0.003056132,0.000001672611],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060520466,0.0001870934,0.003653837,0.0001791424,0.00031909285,0.000003748744,0.08015379,0.0000030147182,0.00021745161,0.14568633,0.7482606,0.021275334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077058194,0.00014941201,0.0040883236,0.00045220432,0.00027647306,0.000058477905,0.06901021,0.00010344681,0.0000072505804,0.0018405358,0.9228897,0.00035337565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028714436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7543085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018875126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047134966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998236},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2043248799","doi":"10.3138/jsp.43.3.257","title":"Sustainability and the Scholarly Enterprise","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Scholarly communication; Publishing; Sustainability; Sociology; Scientific enterprise; Value (mathematics); Work (physics); Public relations; Political science; Engineering; Law; Computer science; Science education","score_opus":0.03707256012307387,"score_gpt":0.23753724059888123,"score_spread":0.20046468047580737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043248799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8082718,0.008765958,0.000045487533,0.021321433,0.0019282515,0.00022258172,0.000012591542,0.000034857443,0.15939699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99058175,0.000054159067,0.00007181868,0.0020084202,0.0027346434,0.0000040304944,0.0000014981576,0.000021798149,0.0045218747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997471,0.00032193624,0.00071920664,0.0001288686,0.00088536215,0.00047365448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953113,0.0005014405,0.0005614422,0.00027207984,0.0030208833,0.0003328588],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010069508,0.00018691612,0.00033889545,0.00026120487,0.000829514,0.15751612,0.0008583881,0.00009464686,0.00038385694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00886351,0.00011138747,0.00023182084,0.00007892105,0.0005982602,0.31174707,0.00028278006,0.002309333,0.000007932721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024139462,0.00012460584,0.016352583,0.000038796377,0.00009878078,0.000010283008,0.054352924,6.260586e-7,0.0000041118124,0.90667534,0.010456696,0.01164386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021026293,0.00012626254,0.009340476,0.000081906604,0.000094414,0.00014273712,0.05460418,0.000004483497,0.000006844755,0.07884195,0.8544328,0.00022132215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013532682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037507347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8439761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017045757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013088601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044086110","doi":"10.3138/jsp.34.3.140","title":"What Good is Copyright?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Session (web analytics); Library science; Division (mathematics); Association (psychology); Political science; Media studies; History; Management; Sociology; Computer science; Business; Advertising; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.056972075111490834,"score_gpt":0.25283009515149646,"score_spread":0.19585802004000563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044086110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29060256,0.019515578,0.00023521349,0.06055178,0.012822376,0.00019745767,0.000017755805,0.00012724157,0.61593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802545,0.000599695,0.0014186566,0.004553069,0.001266919,0.0000025345093,0.000006665633,0.000037639773,0.0118603725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969624,0.0004575199,0.0008920537,0.00018679367,0.0011555053,0.00034569434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946366,0.00026766938,0.00094149343,0.0005496323,0.0033202302,0.00028440406],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069361,0.00019185903,0.0003255014,0.00055832363,0.00077636447,0.28443763,0.0016673456,0.0001784359,0.0017549315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004603574,0.00015531827,0.00024452413,0.00019914839,0.00011356985,0.43298256,0.00010055888,0.0029438846,0.000055188506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026089634,0.00021258414,0.0024859507,0.000019316887,0.00016911137,0.000023535471,0.043531843,0.0000036186386,0.00024998988,0.6955664,0.24892259,0.008788971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065077166,0.000109231936,0.00037964113,0.00018732737,0.000043021297,0.000084701285,0.013826491,0.000007722836,0.00023967482,0.024922075,0.95935357,0.00019578003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000606794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005742006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.710431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016198798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003031408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044242030","doi":"10.1353/scp.2011.0009","title":"Truth or Hope?: Stimulus and Response in Scholarly Publishing","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Environmental, Ecological, and Cultural Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Visibility; Stimulus (psychology); Psychology; Social psychology; Public relations; Cognitive psychology; Political science; Computer science; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.0883646470438931,"score_gpt":0.29268389278823925,"score_spread":0.20431924574434615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044242030","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96485645,0.0020376164,0.000018254452,0.011631255,0.00058320543,0.00015499716,0.000004774449,0.00003104705,0.020682424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99359334,0.0011839155,0.0027144777,0.0011695862,0.0004046787,0.0000051445736,7.172411e-7,0.000015496038,0.00091262604],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958622,0.0011663834,0.0008021363,0.00031190025,0.0012726416,0.0005847472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972036,0.00086834666,0.0006516211,0.0001555788,0.0006498823,0.00047098484],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.016387131,0.00020067443,0.00042106517,0.0003941358,0.0010238251,0.05818086,0.0011803908,0.00040885314,0.0004448548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05831965,0.00014156425,0.0001153143,0.0007712372,0.00034671396,0.25879875,0.00036211385,0.0026245615,0.000008519031],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005452236,0.00076487486,0.750739,0.000031932774,0.00024271266,0.0011818158,0.17422673,0.000010710123,0.0019601872,0.011048526,0.0136464825,0.040694807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016921739,0.0006344936,0.85104346,0.00015327342,0.000039206217,0.000057777655,0.10285307,0.0000024421438,0.00005260787,0.0040987683,0.039068867,0.00030387478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010263926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012514209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20061788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060349255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002951472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044562225","doi":"10.1353/scp.2007.0004","title":"Reluctant Capitalists: Bookselling and the Culture of Consumption (review)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Miller; Publishing; Consumption (sociology); Competition (biology); Economic history; Law; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.027504234951232873,"score_gpt":0.22621421604815048,"score_spread":0.19870998109691762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044562225","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23124959,0.6598663,0.00021420147,0.027254803,0.0011614861,0.00038682402,0.00003707684,0.000054826305,0.07977492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97461,0.020944491,0.0007530686,0.0012245697,0.0009200825,0.000003578251,0.000017083068,0.000017709954,0.0015094449],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770886,0.0003753814,0.000957722,0.00011004024,0.00069271313,0.00015529225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99590033,0.00025805784,0.0013478938,0.00030295242,0.002124273,0.00006651639],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007068033,0.00012907205,0.00035834708,0.00018047431,0.00044744587,0.02061557,0.0008512054,0.00009049357,0.000076187156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002512586,0.000077304445,0.00016220356,0.00007738664,0.0003492849,0.05496539,0.000101801634,0.001621944,0.0000020582984],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013242352,0.000118778524,0.0036213226,0.00046471562,0.00015535943,0.000009034443,0.033204686,0.000012302835,0.000705962,0.788678,0.1683446,0.0045528533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004255027,0.00018161333,0.0065955385,0.0044989414,0.0005035406,0.00030010764,0.0090794135,0.00011301391,0.00014638511,0.061350547,0.9125479,0.0004279755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004565887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007444128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7442033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055383065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006909833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9804011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044709424","doi":"10.3138/jsp.45-1-004","title":"Countering Supervisor Exploitation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intimidation; Devaluation; Supervisor; Negotiation; Work (physics); Cover (algebra); Reinterpretation; Public relations; Business; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.2701438766809471,"score_gpt":0.48505264585468083,"score_spread":0.21490876917373375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044709424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91401577,0.0009000168,0.0010754146,0.06484586,0.0044610626,0.00022099314,0.000003129998,0.000034290428,0.014443436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98913187,0.00019095797,0.0035593063,0.002931325,0.0023865912,0.000029958775,0.0000040033215,0.000021181444,0.0017447994],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979906,0.0002659768,0.0008104472,0.00010071798,0.0005273143,0.00030493317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99502075,0.0003358514,0.00039675325,0.00015421424,0.003798532,0.00029388812],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022495748,0.000088827546,0.00018743858,0.00029631483,0.00059401226,0.00409414,0.000409734,0.00018119747,0.002286928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004523908,0.0000730818,0.000086307395,0.00025012236,0.000018184877,0.08533156,0.000080112666,0.0020044222,0.00024090768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035185356,0.00026903732,0.09583032,0.00022886184,0.00013779296,0.0000051320735,0.04793412,0.000061557745,0.009494651,0.022293756,0.801341,0.02236858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013913582,0.00016525251,0.35120112,0.0006779348,0.000033692246,0.000025744539,0.13337758,0.00020525104,0.00001683656,0.007543266,0.5051204,0.00024154238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034018545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029591069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2962206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027567355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042111284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986251},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2045163921","doi":"10.1353/scp.2010.0002","title":"Blog to the Future?: Journals Publishing in the Twenty-First Century","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Wikis in Education and Collaboration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Publishing; Scholarly communication; Subject (documents); Tipping point (physics); Point (geometry); World Wide Web; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Public relations; Data science; Political science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.024594350982085525,"score_gpt":0.3179442304854141,"score_spread":0.2933498795033286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045163921","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33696678,0.0010252974,0.000044362307,0.62493515,0.010344178,0.00021217071,0.0000026846312,0.000012219667,0.026457196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685653,0.00041184362,0.0010561773,0.0137745645,0.015897311,0.0000091312,0.0000015138978,0.000012892677,0.00027129982],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952819,0.00090750656,0.0007634996,0.00016502266,0.0024515842,0.00043049874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99481404,0.00062294735,0.00081661175,0.00034916608,0.0030747568,0.00032248956],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.035009705,0.0001232513,0.00017789092,0.0005557947,0.0016567778,0.13568588,0.0033576821,0.00028381907,0.00037991122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023816178,0.00007287763,0.00012163134,0.0027154903,0.00008536809,0.094245166,0.000100828816,0.0048611024,0.000018028648],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004369744,0.00027981822,0.05877569,0.000006477176,0.000040698535,0.000022498898,0.18615524,0.000051407296,0.00042269332,0.110909835,0.5971279,0.046164047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021135565,0.00002020491,0.047245074,0.000039504393,0.000011828393,0.00002760385,0.12960812,0.0000020908171,0.00000662444,0.003144474,0.8196004,0.00008273266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043209718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016277943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6315985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022560557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011706834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045319718","doi":"10.3138/jsp.32.3.155","title":"The Gutenberg Syndrome: An Illusion of International Research","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Publishing; Political science; Distribution (mathematics); World history; Media studies; Social science; Sociology; History; Law","score_opus":0.35760856322084233,"score_gpt":0.29545846991432784,"score_spread":0.0621500933065145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045319718","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78638077,0.00095884514,0.000023975694,0.02012927,0.003473672,0.00007987224,0.000009164229,0.000018091727,0.18892632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97531956,0.00025630597,0.00017114621,0.0004454273,0.0024994046,0.0000013043492,0.000005101928,0.00001802792,0.0212837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971024,0.00022779449,0.0006894135,0.00011802933,0.0015943289,0.0002680634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950141,0.00028116602,0.00047963834,0.00023456191,0.0038761713,0.00011438543],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00654493,0.00009161105,0.00017227762,0.00058793486,0.0009384833,0.042677082,0.0015829948,0.00008114805,0.00066296564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023726884,0.000056591347,0.000100858364,0.00015137433,0.00036185136,0.08971867,0.00026054727,0.0015579503,0.000007979368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021676108,0.00019935984,0.003653702,0.000015416246,0.00016396503,0.00021188155,0.025928967,0.0000049316945,0.000590878,0.8546397,0.091192976,0.023181476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003883837,0.00026425588,0.0042226226,0.000097785356,0.000010988189,0.00023178016,0.016065547,0.000023180603,0.000036326448,0.03593396,0.94264835,0.00007679798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002697482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022450562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8514554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000753973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020433632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9583167},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2045562236","doi":"10.3138/jsp.46.2.03","title":"Modern Book Publishing: Web Sites for the Trade","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; World Wide Web; Publication; Key (lock); Computer science; Work (physics); Repertoire; Style (visual arts); Advertising; Business; Political science; Engineering; History","score_opus":0.07119788038218296,"score_gpt":0.25088492121034783,"score_spread":0.1796870408281649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045562236","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0661617,0.032642372,0.011069353,0.70050424,0.006877233,0.0009077996,0.00014448505,0.00037579302,0.18131703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97956157,0.00018406472,0.0013925992,0.00977688,0.0055977516,0.000019065246,0.000032910582,0.000061128376,0.0033740287],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964623,0.00045208563,0.0010644281,0.00025181528,0.0012780556,0.0004913341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925808,0.0025411001,0.0012944962,0.0008111944,0.0024863174,0.0002860993],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01471495,0.00025588297,0.00040338287,0.00051887217,0.0017334425,0.30061933,0.0040650847,0.00024128248,0.00017799909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024377294,0.0001707048,0.00042136823,0.0001788633,0.00018977567,0.31291822,0.00024626538,0.003645146,0.0000057461407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082523904,0.00012461668,0.0008561514,0.000032987435,0.00019593559,0.0000016394482,0.016819617,0.00007266447,0.00089607254,0.23309733,0.709039,0.03878146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011265823,0.0001709091,0.0007515024,0.000091282425,0.00011026443,0.00003235863,0.0026157573,0.0057091196,0.00003070624,0.023550065,0.96558565,0.0002257827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021138597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9133999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015428198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030084237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045890047","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0064","title":"Authorship Renounced: The 'Found' Source in the Historical Record","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Digital and Traditional Archives Management","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Point (geometry); Historical record; Epistemology; Genealogy; Sociology; Philosophy; Art history; Biography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06913777246382775,"score_gpt":0.22528813376584825,"score_spread":0.15615036130202048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045890047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1056305,0.00036255713,0.0002447504,0.22566421,0.0013385195,0.00013113602,0.000004037046,0.00002168706,0.6666026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825372,0.000015749305,0.00012493458,0.0064589214,0.0020832713,0.0000018489523,0.0000025921413,0.00000659809,0.008768856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820226,0.00017981633,0.00047310707,0.00010383965,0.00083179056,0.00020918506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989063,0.00030937864,0.00032272306,0.00015599349,0.0002359502,0.00006964539],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029303127,0.00010339577,0.00014491622,0.00020799675,0.00040500716,0.028116103,0.0011027625,0.000022837596,0.000055156455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007938283,0.000051806277,0.00014957681,0.000121380006,0.00006375157,0.027447231,0.000041500072,0.0014843782,0.000010904164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046696296,0.00020087355,0.00021859631,0.000004975984,0.000024886036,0.000047709957,0.021038013,0.000021524143,0.000003466356,0.7376953,0.13277984,0.10791817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015377662,0.00018160438,0.01712515,0.000041203268,0.00001344492,0.00002965693,0.0017913169,0.000008305438,1.4828927e-7,0.23652376,0.74407053,0.00006108697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012030662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000083725245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87690675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019268888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048248417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9861554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046144318","doi":"10.1353/scp.2012.0000","title":"Peer Review: Fetishes, Fallacies, and Perceptions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Geography; Sociology; Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.045943333999774905,"score_gpt":0.32289134916890655,"score_spread":0.27694801516913164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046144318","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6922676,0.04706362,0.0001942086,0.22523914,0.0011168834,0.00011764854,0.0000076221904,0.000021820955,0.03397144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96558475,0.016700314,0.005366887,0.0042318814,0.002124224,0.0000023401228,0.000003155413,0.000012217191,0.0059742043],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752367,0.00036354287,0.00040799053,0.00009374776,0.0012174546,0.00039358687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969799,0.0001764166,0.0003391096,0.00010456564,0.0019177297,0.00048228042],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012254257,0.00008619701,0.00024274035,0.00017431057,0.0005908733,0.004274018,0.00047744045,0.00014674857,0.00029543685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015543259,0.00007384686,0.00009053544,0.00028483148,0.00024321642,0.053344026,0.00012981228,0.001039247,0.0000068688387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059029585,0.00005068724,0.6547476,0.000029973964,0.000025718635,0.000008714883,0.01328595,1.9639897e-7,0.00014660411,0.014711014,0.30191016,0.015077509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014994988,0.00002591952,0.28273642,0.0001552125,0.000026292086,0.00008350301,0.003928159,2.4291873e-7,0.000001682209,0.00079378847,0.71202093,0.00007790539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000079345955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005642277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41011077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012856333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024596453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99675965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048847490","doi":"10.3138/jsp.33.2.102","title":"Toward a Phenomenology of Running a Book Exhibit","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenology (philosophy); Epistemology; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10431961849384057,"score_gpt":0.2847956220930625,"score_spread":0.1804760035992219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048847490","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4209093,0.04329081,0.0008071488,0.031210246,0.004096575,0.00020013053,0.000012733802,0.00006771241,0.49940538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99346685,0.00010642811,0.001255235,0.0024242382,0.0010600478,0.0000039793567,0.0000016280674,0.000031785603,0.0016498263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973156,0.00023913752,0.0011632395,0.00026880918,0.00051376584,0.00049947394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99706525,0.000167121,0.0013166536,0.00038081795,0.00083258585,0.00023755386],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00186002,0.00020409742,0.00060087873,0.00085110887,0.00013655487,0.0015656407,0.0011696556,0.00043944322,0.004024266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009622093,0.00018946422,0.00026301414,0.00047870228,0.0001946908,0.02489316,0.00018094442,0.0023825215,0.00013331865],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017795219,0.003375179,0.039197497,0.00022624254,0.004636053,0.0022651067,0.08624242,0.00009806994,0.018507412,0.45953313,0.32360026,0.060539115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02023563,0.007013844,0.04268525,0.00077397545,0.000959333,0.006980819,0.016881835,0.00008757244,0.0007833146,0.26561224,0.6361479,0.0018382667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026357748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.9558146e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57255757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010234366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004774207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048980934","doi":"10.3138/jsp.45.4.02","title":"Open Access in China: A Study of Social Science Journals","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"China; Citation; Publishing; Science Citation Index; Social Sciences Citation Index; Bibliometrics; Library science; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.7070312947661989,"score_gpt":0.6487025814534676,"score_spread":0.05832871331273126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048980934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96964407,0.00019372388,0.00070715765,0.004656361,0.0007539768,0.00023494815,0.0000026997807,0.0000026669882,0.023804404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987939,0.000021057254,0.0005658221,0.00017249728,0.0002682099,0.0000016973759,8.050065e-8,0.000009087565,0.00016765436],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9635824,0.0013158668,0.0030671512,0.0006489177,0.030597322,0.0007883259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9659614,0.0029086561,0.003568907,0.00068350206,0.026144415,0.0007331094],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.31815714,0.00014167393,0.0007536471,0.1250635,0.0006275426,0.45167425,0.038551953,0.0001321295,0.00026513977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.387506,0.00009358743,0.00015354586,0.26216376,0.00023080429,0.31936148,0.00968482,0.0023780393,0.0000064581545],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006890456,0.0008768014,0.8575976,0.0000030718993,0.000015774716,0.00002518692,0.0023080541,0.000068196954,0.0016634811,0.0011218733,0.006341221,0.12990984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001927744,0.0005316552,0.9764983,0.000035883415,0.0000060219945,0.000032768152,0.0038653682,0.00033073602,0.0001896502,0.013082336,0.003389628,0.000109905035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036702168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000052527703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13710025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031868045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013283814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049586569","doi":"10.3138/jsp.42.2.182","title":"Flogging a Dead Book?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Diversification (marketing strategy); Publication; Commercialization; Face (sociological concept); Incentive; Project commissioning; Sociology; Media studies; Management; Library science; Political science; Public relations; Social science; Law; Economics; Business; Marketing","score_opus":0.03685964141303819,"score_gpt":0.24166844182413597,"score_spread":0.20480880041109778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049586569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67707515,0.0029450576,0.00022419475,0.04395958,0.0069701676,0.00011175381,0.000012264057,0.0001452532,0.2685566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869435,0.000050275525,0.002854306,0.0027834554,0.003735964,0.0000023860068,0.000007376521,0.000032542124,0.0035902353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762714,0.00017728884,0.0007876417,0.00015795438,0.00092369027,0.00032629046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951656,0.00028912778,0.0008379661,0.00051954243,0.002912366,0.00027543024],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066374247,0.00016421522,0.0002754021,0.0006616048,0.00078667037,0.14209157,0.002122157,0.00018643889,0.00096840615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008623646,0.00013654168,0.00020681725,0.00013449899,0.00013939152,0.26260984,0.00021212026,0.006131245,0.000032153057],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006500935,0.0002526323,0.0074366075,0.000028238526,0.00017782979,0.000055279008,0.037067596,0.000008388369,0.012700487,0.56727403,0.32769045,0.047243435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051287195,0.00006945089,0.0020268844,0.00007167787,0.00003419129,0.00012389728,0.0024784198,0.000042450552,0.00012237002,0.007492996,0.98684466,0.00018016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016961002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034839436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6591542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006858495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002588247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050191318","doi":"10.3138/jsp.34.1.43","title":"Bibliographies and Notes as a Separate Online Publication: A Novel Trend in Support of Scholarly Publishing","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Library science; The Internet; World Wide Web; Scholarly communication; Computer science; Electronic publishing; Media studies; History; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.10321178731109837,"score_gpt":0.2755133918355587,"score_spread":0.1723016045244603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050191318","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.803147,0.007370802,0.00006385963,0.13331369,0.0008418747,0.00026661545,0.00027512258,0.00010929761,0.054611694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892506,0.002118798,0.003230471,0.0031196726,0.0009241902,0.000010121227,0.00011417419,0.000058996975,0.0011730035],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943619,0.00041543186,0.0022661085,0.00045256637,0.0019066836,0.00059732696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890307,0.0008432226,0.002356735,0.0007943779,0.006501924,0.00047300785],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00942054,0.0003859478,0.00077087723,0.016075768,0.00059145485,0.29095113,0.0027454558,0.0004306196,0.00071869785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025737332,0.00034915208,0.0002995288,0.005011338,0.00038083087,0.5472399,0.0005151504,0.005224406,0.000007847629],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030651112,0.0037555,0.11896862,0.00027670403,0.00077083934,0.000087695924,0.08488911,0.000045246976,0.005626827,0.17623991,0.5692172,0.03981587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00534442,0.0008700434,0.055502817,0.00065303536,0.00018032435,0.0004935857,0.012151595,0.00032909345,0.00012203603,0.008537205,0.9149365,0.00087934185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012288549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026941542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34571934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010855489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019299051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989605},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2050514514","doi":"10.3138/jsp.46.3.03","title":"A Voice of One, a Society of One: Community Sustainability in the New Media Age of Individualism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Individualism; Value (mathematics); Sustainability; Certainty; Trustworthiness; Sociology; Exchange value; Environmental ethics; Public relations; Epistemology; Political science; Social psychology; Economics; Psychology; Law; Computer science; Market economy; Philosophy; Ecology; Commodity","score_opus":0.16015492369538642,"score_gpt":0.35959414970018594,"score_spread":0.19943922600479952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050514514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9728639,0.0004553711,0.00006356881,0.023175895,0.00035001905,0.0001736664,0.000016353051,0.0000051689567,0.0028960581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970184,0.00006844275,0.0017996094,0.00047294056,0.00060142635,0.0000011011707,0.0000031806007,0.0000074930254,0.000027400161],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935325,0.0027983147,0.0009732882,0.000073231386,0.0022975467,0.00032514022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99119514,0.0032948605,0.0013212446,0.0002883215,0.003573151,0.00032726073],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024894351,0.00009718008,0.00049069314,0.0001825153,0.0001966665,0.0013358939,0.0018150023,0.0003233358,0.000010701295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068090975,0.000080693855,0.00024109475,0.0011233364,0.000620948,0.012547263,0.00017558518,0.0025965923,2.0227026e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034166966,0.00044737538,0.13878815,0.000099155004,0.00007195245,0.0000031823342,0.83885556,0.0000034910818,0.00018025021,0.0116764195,0.007911152,0.0019291358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011439535,0.00016460656,0.14002393,0.0001914747,0.00008416359,0.0000020115779,0.7084244,9.167955e-7,0.00019129911,0.13860077,0.011078168,0.00009431425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049813796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042017237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13043118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003736475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039624767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051707077","doi":"10.1353/scp.2004.0002","title":"The Twilight of Digitization Is Now","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Digital and Traditional Archives Management","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Digitization; Twilight; Transition (genetics); Computer science; Data science; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.02928040481246272,"score_gpt":0.20364461770019765,"score_spread":0.17436421288773493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051707077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048378978,0.0002923141,0.00024139359,0.009180005,0.000783948,0.00005670776,0.000019349874,0.000007930585,0.9410394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904226,0.00006789338,0.00013373264,0.0006426698,0.00033120965,8.335174e-7,0.0000029138496,0.000007651299,0.00839048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884045,0.00004258258,0.0004048093,0.00006106952,0.00053543685,0.00011563049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862474,0.00014849563,0.00040006224,0.00008996225,0.0006762677,0.00006046007],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077828864,0.00006579119,0.00010343977,0.00012815624,0.00027541493,0.01876764,0.0003392696,0.000011550734,0.00011131049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005537607,0.000039782655,0.00011285325,0.00006059708,0.00010236993,0.03628724,0.000030647596,0.0002976445,0.00000876733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000099430345,0.000059782655,0.00032846877,0.000010970427,0.00006936751,0.000003567325,0.0019060292,0.000006219421,0.000014013557,0.9485779,0.040175505,0.008838276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017548195,0.00006744174,0.0023043524,0.000048554546,0.00001542701,0.000008373874,0.0009045633,0.0000041404865,0.00013477987,0.165219,0.8310702,0.000047689206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000030232306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007769742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94204366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020218096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051546762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.982251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052396718","doi":"10.1353/scp.2004.0027","title":"Editor as Good Steward of Manuscript Submissions: 'Culture,' Tone, and Procedures","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tone (literature); Set (abstract data type); Context (archaeology); Position (finance); Sociology; Computer science; Operations research; Linguistics; History; Business; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.11315128890597664,"score_gpt":0.3909541015844712,"score_spread":0.27780281267849455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052396718","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91521764,0.0059956303,0.001390133,0.05838343,0.011950316,0.00014805736,0.000008405825,0.00001631233,0.006890045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98093057,0.00048697417,0.012119578,0.00071991695,0.0047385097,0.0000018718737,0.0000011215143,0.00001309638,0.0009883362],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951297,0.00013055753,0.001171065,0.0002517234,0.0031071082,0.00020983395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898612,0.0006976661,0.0014949312,0.00032036766,0.0072982437,0.00032762627],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010986889,0.00013510272,0.00034957906,0.000620466,0.00030607198,0.018929962,0.0012028519,0.00030093963,0.000049131384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.110945426,0.00008750993,0.0001180842,0.00089329435,0.00012573093,0.05460815,0.00016885519,0.0015217781,0.0000065097083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045456208,0.0013219188,0.10983549,0.00040292786,0.00024486118,0.00008287782,0.03811753,0.0006451791,0.03183416,0.13329867,0.6430221,0.04073974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017114009,0.0004792129,0.12902859,0.0013575754,0.00007201001,0.0005349957,0.026158866,0.000006060394,0.0039418912,0.687108,0.14926752,0.00033388796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011362474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002614855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55380934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009687704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014374139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9820885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052981458","doi":"10.1353/scp.2007.0000","title":"The Long and the Short and the Tall","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Historical Geography and Geographical Thought","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Discipline; Sociology; Library science; History; Social science; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.010566571657433386,"score_gpt":0.24156439867761148,"score_spread":0.2309978270201781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052981458","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32940537,0.124396265,0.00054940843,0.4312863,0.0016288683,0.00047503144,0.0000026358705,0.000036652567,0.11221946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938819,0.0029797684,0.00009765848,0.0011196677,0.0011920283,0.0000031765949,1.7063661e-7,0.0000052988976,0.00072036294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972762,0.00093999633,0.0004101618,0.00010843472,0.0009867613,0.00027848594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99661964,0.0023195462,0.00024624725,0.00013986135,0.00053275994,0.00014196536],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018973237,0.00008691284,0.0001929252,0.00008677457,0.0030851811,0.023827517,0.0008041287,0.0001265072,0.00000844025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050512003,0.00003441645,0.00019763925,0.0009650033,0.0021521652,0.011797075,0.00010920163,0.0015229695,4.1437352e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031606713,0.000032051375,0.04949482,0.000004084675,0.000099105,0.00001734363,0.0043937196,0.0000054225416,0.000005345596,0.88667166,0.012944739,0.046015657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001370698,0.000023253033,0.07103787,0.000025187359,0.00007364836,0.000028441718,0.0025149204,0.000010475122,9.077014e-7,0.12643002,0.7983983,0.00008628602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012190348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009878819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78545356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026509739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006437732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054397992","doi":"10.1353/scp.2004.0026","title":"Beacon's Modern Era: 1945-2003","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Section (typography); History; Publishing; Library science; Art history; Art; Literature; Computer science","score_opus":0.03142404850984021,"score_gpt":0.29192895476616265,"score_spread":0.26050490625632244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054397992","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4939346,0.0064602974,0.012433517,0.1452111,0.008495116,0.00026169777,0.000019837375,0.00011950351,0.33306432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98214066,0.0003215448,0.0070271716,0.0035111809,0.0051925713,8.182947e-7,0.0000012533676,0.000018777026,0.0017860413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727887,0.00018126833,0.00054296455,0.00012811933,0.0013732288,0.0004955496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965641,0.0001191701,0.0005105128,0.00013334981,0.0021621934,0.0005106698],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005240452,0.00011386696,0.00023379562,0.00026950278,0.00056647614,0.012081818,0.0011165704,0.00040747647,0.00006645287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012093763,0.000103079416,0.00012259404,0.0006461706,0.00019358755,0.06803535,0.0000705905,0.0028527088,0.000016596774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003643038,0.00015210589,0.013984006,0.00001940504,0.00013465351,0.00015496153,0.053024232,0.00052900147,0.00073461316,0.78731346,0.10919139,0.03472576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014705113,0.000095962794,0.0031040977,0.00017255472,0.000060135237,0.00008885104,0.006700589,0.000012620143,0.00013946573,0.25049883,0.737385,0.0002714102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012458295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015322305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6281936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005106996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019764581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055900054","doi":"10.1353/scp.2012.0013","title":"Lester J. Cappon, Scholarly Publishing, and the Atlas of Early American History , 1957-1976","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Atlas (anatomy); History; Political science; Library science; Medicine; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.05914856382283315,"score_gpt":0.24010397090550067,"score_spread":0.18095540708266752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055900054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8688374,0.024396868,0.0000916137,0.028114012,0.002697177,0.0002461245,0.000024741137,0.00006981697,0.07552224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904984,0.00033386078,0.00096185494,0.0023404185,0.0026855592,0.000009760652,0.000013052267,0.0000630552,0.0030939933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937903,0.0015225058,0.0016705445,0.00028456564,0.0020266494,0.0007053863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98878455,0.0011592797,0.003229081,0.00097522046,0.0052692015,0.0005826811],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021334294,0.0003674777,0.0008294192,0.0010188542,0.0007862361,0.15033025,0.0033562705,0.00026289432,0.00021605751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017194016,0.0002558725,0.00038491428,0.00034023976,0.0014808478,0.49455425,0.00066027825,0.006378654,0.000011362405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068024616,0.00045193412,0.104427084,0.00008657948,0.00060004106,0.000010099164,0.17876063,0.0000035212743,0.0006585605,0.43999282,0.24601492,0.028313559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026024089,0.00026422256,0.057555314,0.00022455506,0.00022072782,0.00011495306,0.012587165,0.000014251763,0.0000323442,0.0029625245,0.9230286,0.00039293623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005393071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035318593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6770137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048785913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049375236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056445822","doi":"10.1353/scp.2006.0010","title":"The State of Scholarly Journal Publishing: 1981-2000","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scholarly communication; Library science; State (computer science); Political science; Media studies; Sociology; History; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.33444373919936,"score_gpt":0.4665811689385671,"score_spread":0.1321374297392071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056445822","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8964039,0.021743089,0.0063054026,0.04776792,0.0048840316,0.00022423283,0.000051802173,0.000021208301,0.02259841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844636,0.0009922826,0.0044904645,0.0005080104,0.0018491471,0.0000015785827,0.0000021262404,0.00004079084,0.007652025],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94940376,0.0017794955,0.00533766,0.0006332983,0.04131675,0.0015290595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8906631,0.013196798,0.007354958,0.0013817713,0.08584669,0.0015566972],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2426471,0.0003150076,0.00079749426,0.05885836,0.001704326,0.7083249,0.016251445,0.00037027118,0.00020023923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4286284,0.00017608967,0.0007863065,0.120495245,0.00038449236,0.4241893,0.0015302089,0.008677665,0.000039827846],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019614608,0.00032562614,0.16621093,0.000007703108,0.00013161024,0.00020985256,0.000468503,0.00055667263,0.0035423567,0.003603014,0.3993083,0.42543927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020120714,0.00053077046,0.24496739,0.00009730576,0.000031593845,0.0009982442,0.0015374713,0.00045444752,0.0010107914,0.18816835,0.5598605,0.00033106454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040050215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000065221684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42510822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007515392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035206825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056824033","doi":"10.3138/jsp.46.3.05","title":"Multiple Pie Charts: Unreadable, Inefficient, and Over-Used","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Statistics Education and Methodologies","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pie chart; Chart; Computer science; Simple (philosophy); Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.32282875872673245,"score_gpt":0.4059770818652607,"score_spread":0.08314832313852827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056824033","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.934992,0.001052034,0.052437164,0.0048993477,0.0030452549,0.00014975722,0.000035343757,0.00005866978,0.003330442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58875346,0.00006655481,0.40827075,0.00073888927,0.00074617675,0.0000028479346,0.0000051872616,0.000036845457,0.00137931],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818337,0.00023963279,0.0005662371,0.00012976758,0.0006756406,0.00020537862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947664,0.002716589,0.0006737966,0.0001860069,0.0013202901,0.00033688144],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075242165,0.00011823208,0.0002874322,0.00033113698,0.000090620684,0.0071018306,0.00034921992,0.00012047747,0.00003181719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13551098,0.00009432035,0.000051448656,0.000264088,0.000048138314,0.013842275,0.000104382954,0.00082601316,0.0000026477342],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022193577,0.0005624183,0.102851026,0.00013840005,0.00020148202,0.00007338742,0.017132549,0.000038103426,0.003331201,0.09578762,0.7619756,0.017686268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013034342,0.0008232435,0.046599705,0.00073393725,0.00035767662,0.0010178734,0.040835533,0.0012453494,0.003064303,0.57443774,0.31682837,0.0010219361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028908973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008283515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4786501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011331131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031862984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057169622","doi":"10.1353/scp.2012.0010","title":"The Impact of Submission Experiences on Perceptions of Journal Quality and Editorial Support: The Viewpoint of Chinese Authors","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Perception; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.33476998793629176,"score_gpt":0.5821611179379163,"score_spread":0.2473911300016245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057169622","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41983938,0.0021434117,0.00008335725,0.0012302184,0.576203,0.00013197574,0.00010958913,0.0000018540428,0.0002572336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48263806,0.0020059205,0.0001357941,0.000007857704,0.51503384,0.0000022060121,0.0000033390459,0.00001788141,0.0001550783],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94901323,0.0031932304,0.005457076,0.00046390455,0.041078128,0.00079441135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8016788,0.07912589,0.025080858,0.0022181142,0.08955635,0.0023399992],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24105868,0.00036092452,0.0013485841,0.02192605,0.00096617494,0.04130628,0.0079680635,0.0010589631,0.0003456837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.58672863,0.00013935789,0.0012976301,0.03527428,0.000800294,0.02870993,0.0011033536,0.0076607056,0.0000023341267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036639554,0.00021412186,0.043608703,0.000017411332,0.00011664168,0.000002228379,0.004394237,0.000014730685,0.0006830842,0.000028508086,0.93738306,0.013170911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027383468,0.0051008435,0.45276994,0.00053187064,0.00012902736,0.00013198136,0.029569093,0.000052518793,0.0001436207,0.01343595,0.4948198,0.0005770074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032762406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009736096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44256324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003547917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003524059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99739933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057455581","doi":"10.3138/jsp.34.4.249","title":"My Turn: Reading the Agenda of the 2003 Annual AAUP Directors' Meeting to Discover What's Wrong With University Press Publishing","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Reading (process); Sociology; Media studies; Management; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.0316247041661942,"score_gpt":0.21598266461269877,"score_spread":0.18435796044650457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057455581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81427103,0.0033471938,0.00030878297,0.028723339,0.0039699683,0.0005529346,0.000096487034,0.00007536162,0.14865492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925921,0.00011975588,0.0008751891,0.0009825125,0.0006636922,0.0000019508655,0.000005575337,0.000043647142,0.0047155884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951828,0.0015423973,0.00081074354,0.00029651652,0.0016654807,0.0005020563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99144495,0.0006669747,0.0016271748,0.0009204617,0.0050913263,0.0002491375],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01048358,0.0002799554,0.00041216856,0.0003974563,0.0017731416,0.14025806,0.003714122,0.00016900901,0.00005690681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01593676,0.00016363825,0.00021543422,0.0008519858,0.0002479429,0.3147332,0.0005226106,0.003634121,0.000001194297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046179706,0.0004756878,0.03506322,0.0001285773,0.0010111008,0.000059613176,0.28223893,0.0016398426,0.0011102426,0.36458293,0.2980196,0.015208482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076758343,0.0001240663,0.006714051,0.0009927117,0.00014940533,0.00005892206,0.104091674,0.000020884181,0.00040623927,0.00026605473,0.88610363,0.0003047826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014257785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071392837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58808404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033745842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059710885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058054026","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0003","title":"Acknowledging Clio's Lesser Children: The Importance of Journals for Historical Research and Scholarship","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Media, Communication, and Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Discipline; Comparative historical research; Scholarly communication; Publishing; Sociology; Social science; Flexibility (engineering); History; Political science; Law; Management","score_opus":0.3280552521317372,"score_gpt":0.4425626069265516,"score_spread":0.11450735479481439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058054026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9350153,0.019011814,0.00022238144,0.04252328,0.0007388759,0.00019236971,0.0000013291988,0.0000068577037,0.0022877466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894415,0.0048962436,0.0026828384,0.0001909684,0.0021647874,0.0000056652298,0.0000012194622,0.000012342764,0.000604401],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964639,0.00086722395,0.0007500428,0.00013170402,0.0014474848,0.0003396643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906362,0.0016227927,0.0008352639,0.00030427406,0.006322503,0.00027895064],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.035329647,0.00007846909,0.00023358922,0.0004531511,0.0024585898,0.0043419106,0.0014689364,0.00017551424,0.000033485834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04137902,0.000058583733,0.00010149902,0.0008860612,0.00034870542,0.028676188,0.00010005335,0.002163266,9.66022e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035275512,0.00010957753,0.9278508,0.000012772259,0.000036301928,0.0000012535738,0.031713367,0.0000014149088,0.00024669102,0.005631271,0.029275633,0.005085677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081022864,0.0001816649,0.8559764,0.00031922158,0.00003800546,0.00011791134,0.015632864,0.0000052152973,0.00017744426,0.039121605,0.08745076,0.00016869746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028400857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003236522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07187438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005266112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013604871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058453757","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0081","title":"Launching a New Academic Journal: Twenty Years Later: A Retrospective","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Accounting and Organizational Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Computer science","score_opus":0.01322495748812019,"score_gpt":0.2253484249619961,"score_spread":0.21212346747387592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058453757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9622597,0.0002726255,0.0019874773,0.021773154,0.005375699,0.00011890282,0.0000011065116,0.00009220385,0.008119131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736451,0.000037479273,0.002844997,0.0054143067,0.017285464,4.9119853e-7,0.0000038145815,0.000060923892,0.000707417],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699205,0.000023287013,0.0008683246,0.00022614878,0.0014894593,0.00040074007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99559665,0.000062555315,0.0018688234,0.0002114429,0.0021622528,0.000098279364],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053697424,0.00021113544,0.00032521266,0.0011199084,0.00039868217,0.044694375,0.0014156263,0.00026648783,0.00040728375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009116125,0.0001869485,0.00019004883,0.001125639,0.000035329846,0.12618095,0.00043477167,0.0058450256,0.000101207974],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060352093,0.000078127945,0.6771017,0.000040633928,0.00018824927,0.00015867647,0.00044968433,0.00011232682,0.0036980181,0.02700528,0.2721973,0.018909648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001438763,0.00002463663,0.51386565,0.00021293866,0.00016016119,0.0002551816,0.0005007827,0.00014991927,0.00003438735,0.048055492,0.43496007,0.0003420391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013284109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027802362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16323607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014325281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019429497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058875542","doi":"10.3138/jsp.32.3.136","title":"Scholarly Communication at the Turn of the Millennium: A Bibliographic Essay","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Library Science and Information Systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Negotiation; Public relations; Scholarly communication; Key (lock); Political science; Business; Publishing; Computer science; Advertising; Law","score_opus":0.02699836863358534,"score_gpt":0.23064928888261824,"score_spread":0.2036509202490329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058875542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8662539,0.007657613,0.008422381,0.09844367,0.001560397,0.00025155663,0.00000468506,0.00003876281,0.017367017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933192,0.0010065888,0.0016734573,0.0031693073,0.00013586872,0.0000024921353,7.4187807e-7,0.000006346293,0.00068598235],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99615926,0.0005590561,0.0010316801,0.00013486942,0.0018615574,0.00025357466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946116,0.0002968592,0.0017840943,0.0012743777,0.0018901069,0.00014294167],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009166075,0.00012236364,0.00020740673,0.0014632157,0.000778734,0.0556759,0.008986741,0.00012828871,0.000026009713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013536392,0.00006190068,0.00026887166,0.008590945,0.00015844243,0.41725194,0.0012448775,0.0014945687,0.000011796767],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052528616,0.00016362192,0.5972393,0.000042012995,0.00017459343,0.000011140371,0.029352326,0.0006178862,0.0061523113,0.023475153,0.30936688,0.033352263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013127147,0.00019160521,0.36695093,0.000517836,0.000018596047,0.0012252766,0.0045038406,0.0019801501,0.0019324223,0.0068914434,0.6141581,0.00031709715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000077084565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014780528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36157605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007962889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003631326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99637514},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2058941387","doi":"10.3138/jsp.41.2.191","title":"Sticker Shock and Looming Tsunami","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Recession; Productivity; Shock (circulatory); Global recession; Public relations; Looming; Political science; Business; Economics; Economic growth; Law; Macroeconomics; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.481080741475642,"score_gpt":0.5300071964514028,"score_spread":0.048926454975760814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058941387","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9542613,0.0045297695,0.008149809,0.021495895,0.00076873024,0.00007245887,0.00000396461,0.000010290925,0.01070778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98991954,0.00021159693,0.0074599804,0.0011609638,0.00039651906,1.7601796e-7,2.7045456e-7,0.0000065456247,0.00084443094],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855702,0.00026537885,0.0012087135,0.00035648377,0.012108116,0.00049113197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98265344,0.0032645473,0.000883103,0.00040343363,0.01192151,0.00087398087],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06994426,0.00012612646,0.00036785088,0.046260014,0.00030660944,0.1969589,0.003011717,0.0001809156,0.00015213975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26409796,0.00008246854,0.00015517256,0.06493039,0.000067262954,0.10494345,0.00042059834,0.0017800365,0.00002242154],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004429249,0.0001129105,0.19448349,0.0000025039585,0.000021982774,0.00013397171,0.0003500829,0.000030503998,0.0036627285,0.0031589235,0.05917596,0.73882264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012166441,0.00061192113,0.8347612,0.00005826179,0.000017427215,0.00047098205,0.0014853446,0.0017034934,0.00031312963,0.07167039,0.087448634,0.00024257015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012612137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000017491566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73858005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013223442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028181347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96454984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059132269","doi":"10.1353/scp.2012.0030","title":"Editing Academic Books in the Humanities and Social Sciences: Maximizing Impact for Effort","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Argument (complex analysis); Promotion (chess); Face (sociological concept); Quality (philosophy); Sociology; Digital humanities; Hegemony; Public relations; Value (mathematics); Political science; Library science; Social science; Epistemology; Computer science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.7397174462705441,"score_gpt":0.5726202859908598,"score_spread":0.16709716027968435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059132269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98414063,0.004373451,0.0012158346,0.0061941138,0.00067504257,0.00016878065,0.000010540077,0.0000045936804,0.0032170024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950859,0.000057780773,0.0016542295,0.0012587961,0.001856829,0.0000034738312,4.3492398e-7,0.000007798183,0.00007474462],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889376,0.0003226789,0.0010943175,0.0002307876,0.008581516,0.00083310955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98805934,0.0072194533,0.0011186053,0.00014224091,0.0033088753,0.00015149248],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19473776,0.00012427499,0.00031246076,0.030271608,0.0013794876,0.12705326,0.0036175349,0.00018834474,0.00002451642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0945478,0.00006624651,0.00020460365,0.029605202,0.0003009613,0.10178787,0.00045716987,0.002191873,0.0000020322025],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003067013,0.000048995593,0.89017755,0.000010083864,0.000016929336,0.0000049256737,0.0070512705,0.000011444059,0.0005374215,0.0065654903,0.040308416,0.055236794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011421485,0.00037192833,0.8520878,0.000076195814,0.0000187212,0.00027057467,0.030959884,0.0005144723,0.00010682985,0.023537464,0.090694286,0.00021970997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004955195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005375439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10018996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019034697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032036824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059406478","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0090","title":"Publishing Pedagogies for the Doctorate and Beyond (review)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Sociology; Media studies; Mathematics education; Political science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.07395299359253904,"score_gpt":0.29104062063752045,"score_spread":0.2170876270449814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059406478","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17128056,0.14530674,0.0006927161,0.59506476,0.011296293,0.0009772037,0.0001309295,0.00018435626,0.07506647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96178114,0.0083466,0.0049141035,0.015006461,0.006596423,0.00004284715,0.00003687645,0.00007469679,0.0032008742],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997475,0.00019879258,0.000904486,0.00020224876,0.00087128684,0.00034815972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99127114,0.0017844876,0.0012231056,0.0006325764,0.004860831,0.00022786009],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014787997,0.0002093166,0.00036409462,0.0003400461,0.0014524926,0.22354463,0.002632351,0.0001759,0.00017549576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031480897,0.00013267927,0.00021807548,0.00016533857,0.00025631933,0.27177516,0.000343651,0.0048632477,0.0000027044375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049456547,0.000080248275,0.0013150764,0.0002123891,0.00019147343,0.0000044395047,0.015208076,0.0000023415946,0.0010291127,0.3628982,0.51329833,0.10571089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059111987,0.00008665461,0.0018663841,0.0002575062,0.00013684135,0.000077413475,0.0055643553,0.000053750697,0.000023057246,0.012204498,0.9789481,0.00019028617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014941217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048454988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7905005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004329698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027317778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059713004","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0047","title":"What They Didn’t Teach You in Graduate School: 199 Helpful Hints for Success in Your Academic Career (review)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Innovations in Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Graduate students; Psychology; Medical education; Sociology; Pedagogy; Medicine","score_opus":0.09438516519893382,"score_gpt":0.38524601425517296,"score_spread":0.29086084905623916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059713004","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7760662,0.0201365,0.00017319774,0.20084855,0.0018044084,0.0006126045,0.0000023883606,0.000018120913,0.00033805508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95859015,0.012408078,0.004641796,0.02214981,0.001745703,0.000027899941,0.00005029599,0.00003839066,0.00034787084],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99566513,0.00018560227,0.001783105,0.0002959496,0.001568484,0.00050171476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99585396,0.00012079419,0.000885026,0.00033701913,0.0025226802,0.000280495],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013659782,0.00022230027,0.0006567588,0.0013955451,0.00008817692,0.0027977237,0.00085816527,0.0004084406,0.00004636636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048407484,0.00018183084,0.00015801146,0.0013304505,0.000034624805,0.056282222,0.000057939502,0.0069320076,0.0000066440916],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037821542,0.0007891166,0.28492743,0.00088642136,0.0000929458,0.0001284394,0.005087718,0.0000399677,0.0021391914,0.000664398,0.16541676,0.5394494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006218945,0.00055484177,0.91210973,0.02398187,0.00019519342,0.00052940455,0.008125303,0.00020763004,0.00018721647,0.007813346,0.039632622,0.0004438878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007715661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001866099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6271823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010145875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076511764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060149718","doi":"10.3138/jsp.32.3.164","title":"Scholarly Journal Publishing in Malaysia","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Linguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scholarship; Scholarly communication; Political science; Library science; Public relations; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.048874558178212325,"score_gpt":0.3034102191159333,"score_spread":0.25453566093772095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060149718","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8100813,0.00686309,0.00012299989,0.060591828,0.004568364,0.00014545834,0.00000463882,0.00004980731,0.117572516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98083603,0.0017344033,0.0044414476,0.0023674055,0.008143213,0.0000020555326,0.0000026067469,0.000030012678,0.0024428368],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99344987,0.00096652063,0.0015416393,0.000286352,0.0028143683,0.00094128185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99062586,0.0005087463,0.0013884663,0.00022265632,0.0065012774,0.0007529696],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02045291,0.00026528465,0.0005668964,0.0009394326,0.0022017325,0.31192967,0.00244292,0.0004407481,0.00028803357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07489334,0.00021836243,0.00032591788,0.0019366711,0.00023105249,0.40892744,0.00023717083,0.0066248802,0.000014303349],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017736411,0.00026948887,0.7617765,0.00002279943,0.00022900704,0.0020906543,0.09698222,0.00012136802,0.00018663923,0.02468734,0.08207031,0.031386282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015442848,0.0001217851,0.077524275,0.00044194653,0.000048872407,0.0005706559,0.034788888,0.000021609447,0.000004610787,0.013900073,0.8706914,0.0003415612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011643849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049898145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7886211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007862322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001141795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060378138","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.2.109","title":"Assessing the Demand for Scholarly Publishing in South Africa","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Exploratory research; Sample (material); Mythology; Sociology; Media studies; Social science; Political science; History; Law","score_opus":0.13811937241981662,"score_gpt":0.28774553318244506,"score_spread":0.14962616076262844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060378138","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8710329,0.009407959,0.0021149728,0.044778537,0.0027076507,0.00052792893,0.000038517093,0.00012351171,0.06926803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912098,0.00007193179,0.0032216427,0.0014761015,0.0025247224,0.000023526953,0.000019481451,0.000062021005,0.0013907624],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945065,0.00087901513,0.0016870397,0.00036636612,0.001820689,0.00074039854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98907423,0.0016160366,0.0018173081,0.0007947328,0.006382864,0.00031483217],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.022237763,0.00032709105,0.00056485605,0.0013118912,0.0027281535,0.48987505,0.004230981,0.00035998636,0.000075513584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043017514,0.00023505856,0.0003887503,0.0006103658,0.00029109296,0.6474306,0.00041281566,0.0070178513,0.0000063685984],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025013677,0.00068223046,0.07851327,0.00012253555,0.0004291508,0.00014508255,0.5852652,0.00032519083,0.00081892096,0.15176126,0.16088352,0.02080345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040094145,0.00028429864,0.052308634,0.00068620284,0.00013557142,0.00026778382,0.07417568,0.0005337587,0.000051412026,0.023039607,0.84376365,0.000743967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017248615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015040602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68288016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038496027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081610476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99857014},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2061339689","doi":"10.1353/scp.2010.0003","title":"The Market Demand for University Press Books 2008–15","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Unit (ring theory); Business; Economics; Advertising; Finance; Mathematics","score_opus":0.015030103433670866,"score_gpt":0.1979104961757251,"score_spread":0.18288039274205423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061339689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17232226,0.0016128203,0.21226525,0.056502573,0.007882016,0.0005932853,0.000010821809,0.00019760133,0.54861337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58930033,0.00023050972,0.13561742,0.0021373811,0.0020246988,0.000003803187,0.0000017324555,0.000037658865,0.27064648],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989044,0.000056757646,0.0002455153,0.00012192317,0.00047125484,0.0002001215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807394,0.00055175717,0.00032767942,0.00018998158,0.0006801109,0.00017653265],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021097837,0.00007696902,0.00010030978,0.00016467912,0.0006118343,0.049162194,0.002060307,0.00008395419,0.000007759588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018476673,0.000052869513,0.00010053687,0.00028190936,0.000034736324,0.10912308,0.00029873877,0.0007505001,6.268597e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011846219,0.000032486878,0.0042891777,0.000007471988,0.00006803197,0.00002128005,0.00034575775,0.0000069408156,0.00030074382,0.04780426,0.9096444,0.03736095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004946336,0.00004679886,0.0074182968,0.000011163357,0.000004640865,0.0000513368,0.00008140391,0.0004869183,0.00036130144,0.0031715196,0.9877943,0.00007771547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000035738078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000059681806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41697806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028961282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029557344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95182484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062474449","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0075","title":"Observations on an Emergent Specialization: Contemporary French Cultural History—Significance for Scholarship","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Cultural history; Politics; Sociology; Contemporary history; Comparative historical research; Cultural studies; History; Historiography; Social history (medicine); Anthropology; Social science; Aesthetics; Media studies; Political science; Law; Art; Archaeology","score_opus":0.1808061349937925,"score_gpt":0.27890633558024375,"score_spread":0.09810020058645125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062474449","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8626895,0.0016804173,0.0002505767,0.11549598,0.0095719285,0.00030354797,0.00005320425,0.00006225866,0.009892601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.970898,0.00010287661,0.0016340314,0.0022806902,0.010283695,0.000019953743,0.000059293932,0.000027081216,0.014694402],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807215,0.00009351797,0.0007087604,0.0002078468,0.00070247543,0.00021526567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99488026,0.000108748645,0.00069345726,0.00017209345,0.0038959102,0.00024953095],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013542119,0.00017197129,0.0003334754,0.00014893519,0.0021759067,0.0076267105,0.0006296731,0.00012493644,0.0007540291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025818716,0.00012206118,0.0003228371,0.00011652694,0.00012290664,0.039766125,0.000034089702,0.0013462716,0.0000057432385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054918433,0.00031412285,0.006840804,0.000025613657,0.00023317836,0.000009568114,0.06242593,0.000018546478,0.0022217077,0.30530092,0.6207652,0.0017894997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004102756,0.00021569648,0.0041028634,0.000026358912,0.00006062464,0.0000017595322,0.0037994585,0.00001679693,0.000010622487,0.00473573,0.9864303,0.00018954156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035740764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015430449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36566508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011970827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016119955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991231},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2062908271","doi":"10.1353/scp.2012.0020","title":"The Price of University Press Books: 2009-2011","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Yankee; Distribution (mathematics); Sociology; Library science; Media studies; History; Art history; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05365451121567712,"score_gpt":0.2238872846750657,"score_spread":0.1702327734593886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062908271","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33539215,0.025456598,0.00037753914,0.018383674,0.004197806,0.00023091765,0.000050811217,0.00007384862,0.6158367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98555624,0.00040892506,0.0005219467,0.000194292,0.001203782,3.7642423e-7,0.0000028639702,0.000015175611,0.0120963715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779034,0.00054914324,0.0005311908,0.00007627294,0.00074598705,0.00030708837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99516034,0.000668776,0.0011218181,0.00043084135,0.0024176675,0.0002005768],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009847624,0.00010920761,0.00019734468,0.00021377075,0.0008760189,0.025776312,0.0020294343,0.00009864516,0.000084162144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003520588,0.00007652876,0.00013359213,0.000077609315,0.00016809457,0.16586491,0.00025684116,0.001762077,0.000005314147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017675683,0.00026088464,0.00670005,0.000028840546,0.00021405237,0.000003938542,0.027355744,0.000005958236,0.0005579632,0.6789655,0.27479562,0.010934692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031779238,0.00006313805,0.0066970135,0.00004941335,0.00004465926,0.000015791506,0.007031821,0.0000052007613,0.00012517453,0.000586728,0.9849708,0.0000924302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036036957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003773147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7101752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011537181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014604379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97523504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062942644","doi":"10.1353/scp.2007.0022","title":"The Post-petroleum Future of Academic Libraries","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Global Energy and Sustainability Research","field":"Energy","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vision; Abandonment (legal); Petroleum; Industrial organization; Economics; Political science; Business; Sociology; Geology","score_opus":0.014692042453980935,"score_gpt":0.26920079364705213,"score_spread":0.2545087511930712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062942644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9050392,0.012938988,0.00018078962,0.04691349,0.001194858,0.000058727277,0.0000033307954,0.000025208887,0.03364542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99566156,0.0003015293,0.0005562617,0.00062940037,0.0015960939,6.403972e-7,0.0000022075164,0.000018355935,0.0012339613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966421,0.00026683568,0.0009506557,0.00013540687,0.0014474045,0.00055758463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946248,0.00081145373,0.0005895431,0.00031575028,0.003351949,0.00030648822],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01051763,0.00013598111,0.00026755952,0.00033561047,0.00039593686,0.0070072664,0.0017855811,0.00042610714,0.000047364334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011928296,0.000085578766,0.00022756652,0.00067833107,0.0001943155,0.045302004,0.0002691456,0.0040212213,0.0000027017154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011101401,0.00007383433,0.028233312,0.00004807333,0.00018243812,0.00011191374,0.001165905,0.00078855816,0.0028654318,0.76835805,0.0068930173,0.19016932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089709746,0.00033325204,0.06623846,0.00007239362,0.00002687296,0.00017648027,0.018401057,0.000027446715,0.0023309481,0.090266466,0.821063,0.00016651713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026594315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012137113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017440578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005813941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99827653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063033108","doi":"10.3138/mh84-185j-7151-5363","title":"The Council of Editors of Learned Journals (CELJ) Keynote Address MLA Convention 2005","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Reflective Practices in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Documentation; Convention; Obligation; Transition (genetics); Term (time); Period (music); Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Library science; History; Operations research; Management; Computer science; Engineering; Art; Aesthetics; Economics","score_opus":0.1325622721013163,"score_gpt":0.41540231570725794,"score_spread":0.2828400436059416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063033108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6995683,0.009491736,0.0033008186,0.04320346,0.029037686,0.00038725897,0.000006167037,0.000023684439,0.21498093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872081,0.0011271248,0.001718291,0.00011021307,0.008296072,9.04453e-7,4.6382002e-7,0.000016064389,0.0015227328],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99277997,0.0010037437,0.0013799376,0.00013588661,0.0042807823,0.000419652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806061,0.0023814084,0.0046435986,0.00021067621,0.011906514,0.00025169965],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.079822145,0.00010671556,0.0002801801,0.00032342086,0.0007349898,0.007401156,0.001207874,0.00025888486,0.00012653292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.082011975,0.00008138215,0.00021241515,0.0007836602,0.00034572382,0.05620975,0.000069731,0.0019439273,0.000002736114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023152796,0.0015012206,0.19642451,0.00015116466,0.0013220842,0.00004100648,0.17404327,0.00037412546,0.08468522,0.027792167,0.20136432,0.3099856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008022836,0.00016993284,0.045653168,0.0002948842,0.000119904085,0.000025914424,0.03590458,0.000007245248,0.0034806237,0.010967748,0.902431,0.0001427085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008350271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066624396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7010667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017795748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050913035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9936293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063540122","doi":"10.3138/jsp.36.4.243","title":"I Left My Wallet in San Francisco","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"nobody; Privilege (computing); Politics; Liberian dollar; State (computer science); Law; The Internet; Media studies; Sociology; History; Political science; Business; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.014703454424898057,"score_gpt":0.22374985320871046,"score_spread":0.2090463987838124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063540122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8584039,0.0031981063,0.014429896,0.098966695,0.0011302321,0.000078858066,0.0000012438722,0.000069141955,0.0237219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.928534,0.000032286847,0.064416364,0.0058720657,0.00089414505,3.4183438e-7,5.5011037e-7,0.000009935199,0.00024033154],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788946,0.00013079363,0.0006423352,0.00019996519,0.00082173734,0.00031571434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861735,0.00011301071,0.0004014019,0.00032522794,0.00031665282,0.00022633652],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025624463,0.00012335785,0.00023455873,0.0005953044,0.000092327864,0.032102257,0.0031424297,0.00013448214,0.00011274891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004092981,0.00010306958,0.00008829289,0.00057309784,0.00001374649,0.2962513,0.00033600826,0.0016225566,0.000024714554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008869588,0.00072214665,0.34457707,0.00008742308,0.0001438161,0.000774754,0.023589352,0.0030924336,0.008172053,0.065846086,0.12997407,0.4229321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020836873,0.00025024873,0.3412504,0.00029711216,0.000008501775,0.00049964996,0.00056725345,0.006644821,0.0011424825,0.00909921,0.63771904,0.00043759067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037487218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000078891084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50774497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007284317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002083188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9689025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064231682","doi":"10.1353/scp.2010.0004","title":"Writing for Academic Journals (review)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Praise; Academic writing; Discipline; Curiosity; Sociology; Rhetorical question; Media studies; Psychology; Pedagogy; Literature; Social science; Art","score_opus":0.09939657843916172,"score_gpt":0.3284199350534625,"score_spread":0.2290233566143008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064231682","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4837159,0.16749659,0.0013318643,0.2229688,0.014043969,0.0009570916,0.00011345485,0.00023177017,0.10914056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9591233,0.007011272,0.008318906,0.011270802,0.012347663,0.00002160913,0.00002503888,0.000078882586,0.0018025159],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966573,0.00020464337,0.0015360103,0.0001717726,0.0010389241,0.00039136063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901189,0.00078617764,0.0019011168,0.00043623018,0.00642986,0.0003276651],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020326156,0.0001876628,0.0004378827,0.0005889997,0.0008504023,0.06300615,0.0026030114,0.0002561181,0.0005403445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030149868,0.00015411526,0.00036274202,0.00016599825,0.000105895626,0.19306763,0.00016738549,0.008783502,0.000010096296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005817551,0.00014268428,0.00565754,0.00032684187,0.00019302683,0.00001500412,0.0077928826,0.0000030943131,0.011915234,0.15298569,0.6884655,0.13244438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078010064,0.00010239656,0.001803869,0.001935217,0.000115213676,0.00027218144,0.0017037556,0.000024155626,0.00010422608,0.012821206,0.98008364,0.00025405243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026303487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005229141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47540742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006873962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030943917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9935033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065217297","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44-4-005","title":"The Current State of Open Access in Journals Sponsored by the China Association for Science and Technology","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Association (psychology); Library science; State (computer science); Political science; Computer science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.4486040440155202,"score_gpt":0.5848375414099297,"score_spread":0.13623349739440954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065217297","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89937633,0.0070043006,0.00041817862,0.09156458,0.0006171847,0.0005043112,0.000016023205,0.0000019168092,0.000497181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977356,0.0013859461,0.00032671195,0.00008861398,0.00004884844,0.000012404242,1.5091345e-7,0.000005200344,0.00039652103],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852933,0.00044581137,0.0015602973,0.00031136748,0.011790059,0.0005991159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93864095,0.011452159,0.0037757386,0.00055209117,0.045211423,0.00036766275],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24657454,0.00008745374,0.0003007068,0.031747103,0.0008679463,0.36884713,0.01729032,0.000066613225,0.00001423046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.53872895,0.000039793857,0.00006231804,0.13110444,0.00032576802,0.13877909,0.0033923567,0.00168552,0.0000016852904],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018579041,0.000043581556,0.20557997,0.0000015652375,0.000009061874,4.1496514e-7,0.000097091746,0.0000054863235,0.0022589748,0.00038770115,0.055031184,0.7365664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007260642,0.0001259992,0.785497,0.00004390477,0.000004397482,0.000014399657,0.00039297342,0.0009067103,0.0010463417,0.15879631,0.05237234,0.00007356878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000128344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002872839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7364928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000432391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012724409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9880266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065688582","doi":"10.1353/scp.2007.0035","title":"Musings on Disciplinary Morphology and Nomenclature in the Humanities and Social Sciences: Implications for Book Selection","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Nomenclature; Directory; Sociology; Scholarship; Perspective (graphical); Library science; Social science; Political science; Taxonomy (biology); Computer science; Ecology; Biology; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.13294995514322913,"score_gpt":0.31967563138567234,"score_spread":0.1867256762424432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065688582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9083156,0.001517546,0.00026231093,0.07279944,0.0002723563,0.00020419162,0.000014407314,0.000018094624,0.016596047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920355,0.000038047972,0.00058411394,0.0062011844,0.00082068564,0.0000067237524,0.000006933225,0.000009446631,0.00029738073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883556,0.0001355695,0.00040096033,0.0001425484,0.0002661324,0.00021921292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982721,0.0006442307,0.00038968597,0.00009501316,0.00057585427,0.000023112587],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0078281425,0.000099649944,0.0001506787,0.00056603673,0.0025817892,0.03949413,0.000578453,0.000112182825,0.00000834987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075490447,0.000069984446,0.000048465987,0.00014133519,0.00039503048,0.044572406,0.00008232093,0.0013519384,1.894379e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082032115,0.00011264105,0.008276768,0.000023240322,0.000022722874,0.0000018884568,0.101571746,0.0000020324421,0.0005529563,0.85900736,0.025195116,0.0051515135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012320547,0.0008883062,0.27008614,0.0001276333,0.000058211033,0.00023247313,0.038061444,0.000028597857,0.000015312473,0.086933576,0.6020634,0.00027285088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005959843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041798316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77207375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008705389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008898712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065706071","doi":"10.1353/scp.2011.0012","title":"Freedom to Read vs. Obligation to Protect: New Technologies and Twenty-First-Century Policies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Politics; Order (exchange); Dissemination; Variety (cybernetics); Obligation; Freedom of the press; Political science; Freedom of information; Cohesion (chemistry); Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.0412535669253043,"score_gpt":0.2775048873826669,"score_spread":0.23625132045736258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065706071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66705,0.003118947,0.00063415803,0.3006687,0.0014745452,0.0007480213,0.000008540614,0.00025385252,0.026043262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98767006,0.00071704586,0.009415862,0.0011053887,0.0007409581,0.000009605051,3.7912983e-7,0.000015237854,0.00032544314],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997959,0.000101221856,0.00044150976,0.00020551814,0.000889229,0.0004035076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980367,0.000094586816,0.0003379528,0.00017146194,0.0009972483,0.00036204798],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026729545,0.00014447603,0.00027390665,0.0006581622,0.00088441675,0.008501318,0.0008680573,0.00022634845,0.000037065056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012838996,0.00012805975,0.00008157047,0.0010570495,0.00021480222,0.026181653,0.00038466085,0.00094841,0.000009911849],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022744344,0.00014675592,0.041132,0.000033898054,0.00017109432,0.00003591418,0.5975621,0.0000074295112,0.00041060188,0.123151064,0.092037454,0.14508429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005706567,0.00048238313,0.06121333,0.00044331225,0.000054020653,0.000022765562,0.27137232,5.730436e-7,0.00031588075,0.028495017,0.6366732,0.00035654547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014736927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010770445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5446357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021273141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025221807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065915312","doi":"10.3138/jsp.41.2.176","title":"Academic Search Engine Optimization (<scp>ASEO</scp>)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Spam and Phishing Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":166,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Search engine optimization; Computer science; Search engine; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.027722547981344433,"score_gpt":0.25999385400293074,"score_spread":0.2322713060215863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065915312","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12838255,0.0012399104,0.85604864,0.010732873,0.0013376013,0.000079047364,7.912908e-7,0.000121556164,0.0020570217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.881401,0.0002072611,0.11487153,0.0018156305,0.0014529763,6.5435165e-7,0.000002272142,0.000014535595,0.00023410817],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973294,0.00018700707,0.00060028635,0.00024010058,0.0012814917,0.00036168864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972608,0.00027031882,0.000464608,0.00030551985,0.0013827346,0.00031598224],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049778624,0.00014536246,0.00021555064,0.0007926989,0.0002407728,0.02413336,0.0020535337,0.00029846907,0.0000059642307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051436913,0.00013273579,0.0001239295,0.0013733032,0.000015882046,0.12968871,0.00013485759,0.0032293673,0.000008858064],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039816707,0.00030747615,0.007328746,0.00004002269,0.0001480121,0.00027215955,0.00803294,0.37807223,0.03525906,0.02037654,0.07606384,0.47405913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0064181513,0.0035314264,0.1017054,0.0010826017,0.00014537443,0.0040338323,0.001221305,0.7081884,0.05089637,0.03475896,0.08713579,0.00088239746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010592825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.8631225e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7530185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017859864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000220167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066581125","doi":"10.3138/jsp.32.3.169","title":"Personalities in Publishing: Maeve O'Connor","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Writing and Publishing","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foundation (evidence); Publishing; Journal editor; Scientific publishing; Library science; History; Art; Computer science; Literature","score_opus":0.07532870653775846,"score_gpt":0.25186787671622324,"score_spread":0.17653917017846477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066581125","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6116167,0.0033050517,0.00005756196,0.07062861,0.0023345405,0.00010215572,0.000025010078,0.000083711,0.3118467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97454506,0.00015679511,0.00047986096,0.004618715,0.009050686,0.0000039261913,0.000014568727,0.00005030892,0.011080064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99567986,0.0003218121,0.0014067327,0.00029843053,0.0015840135,0.00070918264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99525386,0.0006242989,0.0010624843,0.0002405874,0.0024630611,0.00035570568],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010519686,0.00027749751,0.00052563957,0.0013799982,0.0004561583,0.15917486,0.0018502377,0.00036692282,0.0014617532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014906568,0.00024188585,0.00026350352,0.00041176938,0.00018672082,0.30391166,0.00020699891,0.0058155926,0.000017258173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017487371,0.00019718645,0.10368679,0.00008210038,0.00012540545,0.00052207895,0.10989719,0.00003594819,0.000106881496,0.41403258,0.34930304,0.021835947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012438474,0.00009342524,0.0052857194,0.0004715664,0.000029758985,0.00042201288,0.08207553,0.00005090841,0.000008401878,0.016871464,0.8931125,0.00033488052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012344646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052844244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5438095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031451287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038561138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067019328","doi":"10.1353/scp.2012.0016","title":"Scientometric Analysis of Nuclear Science and Technology Research Output in Iran","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Science Citation Index; Productivity; Discipline; Citation analysis; Scientometrics; Library science; Citation impact; Nuclear science; Work (physics); Social science; Political science; Operations research; Sociology; Mathematics; Computer science; Engineering; Economic growth; Economics; Nuclear engineering","score_opus":0.6918588627989544,"score_gpt":0.5879321123082115,"score_spread":0.10392675049074285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067019328","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98655427,0.0035146591,0.00009022208,0.0054263915,0.000450631,0.00010053922,0.000006291957,0.000005717278,0.00385126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99685085,0.00020285243,0.0026714369,0.00006850415,0.00008423313,7.404524e-7,1.4665076e-7,0.0000084107205,0.000112798145],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95781344,0.00062016933,0.0018580985,0.0005856432,0.037729945,0.001392724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91829026,0.006808144,0.0013790176,0.0010693673,0.07100061,0.0014526119],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.41112942,0.0001235384,0.00068161415,0.7130778,0.0005293533,0.059931945,0.0077457046,0.00026412186,0.00007977145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.637932,0.000086873755,0.00013545397,0.87312263,0.0015980494,0.09938844,0.0026929246,0.00277092,0.0000130958815],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014937335,0.00018903616,0.9084578,0.0000032303044,0.00004383145,0.0000084647245,0.0005525182,0.000017283792,0.005976557,0.0032343103,0.0022390715,0.07926293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043792187,0.00023866016,0.9790356,0.000022246626,0.00003279605,0.00003309132,0.0047297627,0.0017046079,0.00030595626,0.0019694099,0.011384707,0.00010522631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011403288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011700749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22680256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065535883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088860677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068203480","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0084","title":"The Future of Scholarly Journal Publishing among Social Science and Humanities Associations: Report on a Study Funded by a Planning Grant from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Revenue; Sample (material); Scholarly communication; Library science; Business model; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Business; Marketing; Computer science; Accounting; Law","score_opus":0.31479195236960955,"score_gpt":0.4687641151888939,"score_spread":0.15397216281928433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068203480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9776243,0.0018571599,0.0003918828,0.014651171,0.003077054,0.0002854683,0.000026357477,0.000009778129,0.0020768133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970737,0.00011016787,0.00032338922,0.00034759048,0.0019438692,0.0000025869151,0.0000036316164,0.000016304784,0.00017873947],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9651853,0.0010722134,0.0026694436,0.0005994817,0.029697856,0.0007757187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9135692,0.017044986,0.008392848,0.0009655765,0.05930892,0.0007184635],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2968658,0.00022448045,0.00049883826,0.014794176,0.0071874666,0.5779112,0.007442352,0.0003014826,0.000028978959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.40769568,0.000117753596,0.00021574069,0.042958084,0.00076543924,0.22826727,0.0010237263,0.008144926,0.0000013785361],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009273567,0.0002254952,0.8462559,0.0000014868748,0.00011786634,0.0000775537,0.005764788,0.0000022445688,0.0041422443,0.001860483,0.03839724,0.10306198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010346392,0.00032887387,0.9041358,0.000035910896,0.000039830873,0.00013902734,0.05244342,0.000059949798,0.0001488319,0.011698104,0.029781353,0.00015425107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038394803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034377913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34964395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045317542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014307769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99792784},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2068391864","doi":"10.3138/jsp.43.2.188","title":"Automated Document Analyser for Screening of Journal Articles","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Analyser; Acknowledgement; Computer science; Macro; Visual Basic for Applications; Task (project management); Information retrieval; Word processing; Software; Data science; World Wide Web; Natural language processing; Programming language; Computer security; Management","score_opus":0.07033598059158333,"score_gpt":0.2975578062188363,"score_spread":0.227221825627253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068391864","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3161863,0.0004986375,0.68162227,0.0009974539,0.00046169432,0.0000705075,9.250243e-7,0.00008643562,0.00007578082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62445974,0.0000099473355,0.37529314,0.000055600824,0.00014776105,0.0000011780926,1.6008147e-7,0.000011018359,0.000021456859],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99712753,0.00012377754,0.0008934152,0.00015465697,0.0013077104,0.00039292613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946575,0.0006191745,0.0007862658,0.00031895618,0.0032706386,0.000347475],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008284269,0.00012282968,0.00029572647,0.0010210703,0.00014804114,0.012001119,0.0024075746,0.00010517897,0.00002465946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011748027,0.00010057526,0.00023417837,0.00093166286,0.000030763185,0.06917928,0.00027749725,0.0011521559,0.0000014157265],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005895405,0.00089777505,0.46785608,0.00033015638,0.0028365247,0.00084747607,0.023129476,0.008623753,0.04723133,0.021288885,0.06364341,0.36272562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008148236,0.0030036692,0.77318996,0.0015726913,0.0002449436,0.0033301355,0.0018339907,0.096745886,0.07192929,0.031941336,0.00697991,0.0010799301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024369188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000010415083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36164567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011259162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026137033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068464889","doi":"10.3138/jsp.33.1.1","title":"Editing a Specialized Encyclopedia","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"American History and Culture","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Encyclopedia; Scope (computer science); Publishing; Negotiation; Library science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Sociology; Political science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.019546365618290526,"score_gpt":0.21658209610789378,"score_spread":0.19703573048960327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068464889","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33185807,0.0010389169,0.0009409671,0.011364617,0.0040701246,0.0000968067,9.615472e-7,0.00008356866,0.65054595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90271795,0.00012357692,0.0025286155,0.015605102,0.074016675,0.0000031040497,0.000009015844,0.000059928578,0.004936058],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982394,0.00002227274,0.0005516835,0.00014700007,0.0007666189,0.00027305633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99728143,0.00003662211,0.0011604924,0.00013697162,0.0013417053,0.000042801978],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001826133,0.00014468738,0.0002716116,0.0004154244,0.00031388248,0.018620031,0.00070101675,0.000118922384,0.0009170337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003910785,0.00012038678,0.00017587557,0.0008470778,0.000044915505,0.14840288,0.00012160599,0.0012534235,0.00008013282],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017622332,0.00015893247,0.110347986,0.000050746155,0.00009269061,0.000657437,0.0006870741,0.000040271367,0.0010776784,0.017363366,0.81353045,0.055817135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006059436,0.0000119859,0.0081274295,0.00007590988,0.000051009272,0.00010104043,0.00190165,0.000017518667,0.0000023614443,0.0021482967,0.9868145,0.00014237937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000068632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016064629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6456099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009676837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006436571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068707425","doi":"10.3138/jsp.32.1.33","title":"The Editor as Gap-Filler: The Letters of Margaret Laurence and Adele Wiseman","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Poetry Analysis and Criticism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Extant taxon; Subject (documents); Balance (ability); Sociology; Art history; History; Psychology; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.018585087574083673,"score_gpt":0.21949962104574539,"score_spread":0.20091453347166172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068707425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8025415,0.006251038,0.000011864214,0.13913606,0.0022517852,0.00008626572,0.00001876275,0.000012876769,0.04968987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988115,0.00048117468,0.000028380351,0.0021483456,0.0066451035,0.0000013299318,0.0000011754655,0.000010329056,0.0025691488],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829346,0.00015339108,0.00051688496,0.000101843085,0.0007229422,0.00021149738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845207,0.0003223995,0.00035251759,0.00020314014,0.0005700923,0.00009978888],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024240913,0.00010848234,0.00020829709,0.000089861256,0.0008477185,0.018049423,0.0007543784,0.00005014456,0.0013318454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00074701634,0.000055386998,0.00015303782,0.00008162242,0.00031642817,0.017901018,0.000052080843,0.0009630584,0.00000694245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008631481,0.00007308474,0.0009964406,0.000022101909,0.0003029384,0.000025809408,0.016019173,0.000025006273,0.0006284673,0.088460125,0.86874115,0.02461941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025828488,0.000087908884,0.001363776,0.00009439883,0.00009361981,0.000039782357,0.00784171,0.000027806136,0.000046342033,0.004120717,0.9859329,0.000092757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018713783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016339733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18557353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020033247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049154743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070044673","doi":"10.3138/jsp.46.2.01","title":"University Presses in the Twenty-first Century: The Potential Impact of Big Data and Predictive Analytics on Scholarly Book Marketing","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Big Data and Business Intelligence","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Predictive analytics; Big data; Analytics; Profit (economics); Data science; Marketing; Database marketing; Business; Computer science; Economics; Data mining; Marketing management; Relationship marketing","score_opus":0.05499700988000632,"score_gpt":0.25854224125746006,"score_spread":0.20354523137745373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070044673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95794743,0.0027453979,0.0068927924,0.021216864,0.0015110755,0.00043310627,0.0001540696,0.00002583997,0.009073399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99708277,0.0005609631,0.0000699107,0.00068971823,0.0015227179,2.1610664e-7,0.00003928417,0.000013033343,0.000021413009],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783176,0.00019989314,0.000479505,0.0002568487,0.00096643064,0.0002655513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99649096,0.00056173187,0.0011003116,0.0006499659,0.001166783,0.000030240713],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009527566,0.00017834044,0.00026146465,0.00057310634,0.0004000805,0.020658,0.0030089729,0.00012414344,0.000037606576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00977804,0.000102578975,0.00010212993,0.0009676834,0.00012826522,0.10091098,0.00097154605,0.0015739889,0.0000022491345],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026733286,0.000727355,0.776199,0.00048358555,0.00064527756,0.00012495587,0.0007539703,0.003734035,0.0005572338,0.0036946977,0.12361768,0.08678888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008941991,0.00008552997,0.7505692,0.00068266736,0.00029441307,0.000038266466,0.002602309,0.009969663,0.000005438052,0.0006164821,0.23403504,0.00020678362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005102469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007366459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11041737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006552705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000089119305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070173045","doi":"10.3138/jsp.46.3.06","title":"A Simple System for Constructing an End-of-Book Index","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Simple (philosophy); Term (time); Index (typography); Search engine indexing; Appeal; Construct (python library); Discretion; Word (group theory); Control (management); Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Programming language","score_opus":0.10134012228605593,"score_gpt":0.285014577911837,"score_spread":0.18367445562578105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070173045","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9148315,0.004459817,0.0029384336,0.0037839308,0.0037085451,0.0003950078,0.00010903177,0.0001570831,0.06961666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941344,0.0000059457366,0.0035853675,0.00026768187,0.0016539575,0.000005257058,0.000023487084,0.000030358764,0.00029351638],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720615,0.00033381482,0.0011013246,0.00015990468,0.0009148401,0.00028396698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99098766,0.0003873651,0.0016350453,0.00043230673,0.006199263,0.0003583659],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009479484,0.00015834802,0.00041900386,0.000567098,0.00039395576,0.048487604,0.0015386338,0.00015909108,0.00004676369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00689001,0.00013658396,0.000180277,0.00012551495,0.00014231876,0.17921309,0.00014626619,0.0014517013,0.0000016219076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054992066,0.00036980066,0.03395463,0.00034636437,0.00045789094,0.000023622886,0.096185476,0.00019483991,0.0014987248,0.7474948,0.072840996,0.0460829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035295067,0.0007582612,0.0005713153,0.0004981503,0.00013436544,0.00022950993,0.15853307,0.00070933014,0.0004784802,0.011827559,0.8223294,0.00040107127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003844917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013611898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7494884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002513757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065133104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95250016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071599000","doi":"10.3138/jsp.34.1.53","title":"A Scholarly Book Marketing Fantasy","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fantasy; Simple (philosophy); Marketing; Advertising; Media studies; Business; Art; Sociology; Literature; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06455658632446229,"score_gpt":0.23097513765236427,"score_spread":0.16641855132790198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071599000","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17959617,0.04108817,0.00018145842,0.06210019,0.003696842,0.00024586174,0.000034817866,0.00025436774,0.7128021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9673232,0.0008675613,0.0022659455,0.0055033905,0.003569816,0.0000059962535,0.000010983495,0.00007423669,0.020378863],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995087,0.00092784944,0.0013757864,0.000288615,0.0017674862,0.00055321166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99217105,0.0007050741,0.0014534087,0.0007160317,0.0045369887,0.00041746962],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013442324,0.0002892883,0.0004637766,0.0010571384,0.0012835532,0.28378084,0.002935701,0.00025268467,0.0038375398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020923542,0.00025219683,0.00035193516,0.0003053356,0.00016452649,0.4766042,0.0003480308,0.0057589225,0.00012069579],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011793198,0.000407797,0.005636823,0.000060779177,0.00029541654,0.00010793738,0.030552562,0.000010681804,0.00088880927,0.06599844,0.83137214,0.064550646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009577293,0.00013662118,0.0023851006,0.0003256307,0.00006723693,0.00017539201,0.0036703337,0.00015500443,0.000026031355,0.0014809754,0.99029607,0.000323886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000086956345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004882962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78772706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028186117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012314392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072207224","doi":"10.3138/jsp.42.1.1","title":"The Market Demand for University Press Books","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Competitor analysis; Order (exchange); Revenue model; Unit (ring theory); Marketing; Business; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.015089720587260248,"score_gpt":0.19778444294085704,"score_spread":0.1826947223535968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072207224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17855012,0.0008415312,0.22745723,0.05008028,0.0065633147,0.00045015497,0.000006396485,0.00015570408,0.5358952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68450385,0.00014307874,0.122054815,0.0015463086,0.0014962725,0.0000025765555,9.620721e-7,0.000025964035,0.19022618],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907047,0.00004725552,0.00021054478,0.00010199084,0.00040389673,0.00016582866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982579,0.0005445232,0.00028464745,0.00016579386,0.000601963,0.0001451965],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001992596,0.0000633168,0.0000837018,0.0001366651,0.00054406974,0.050981488,0.0019150344,0.000069879454,0.000004348279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018002336,0.00004269655,0.00008845665,0.00023436664,0.000029069548,0.110344514,0.00026562077,0.0006573706,3.7880727e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015486949,0.000040099574,0.005556309,0.000009858928,0.00008934734,0.000024638184,0.0005118917,0.0000072618536,0.00052388565,0.1508354,0.77229047,0.06995596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042626515,0.000041076622,0.0067662112,0.000008763632,0.0000037205189,0.00004136135,0.00007422602,0.00042771618,0.000381983,0.003940104,0.9878251,0.00006347212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000243572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000035503128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5059537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024374545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024330412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9500037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072649556","doi":"10.3138/jsp.45.2.002","title":"Library Demand for E-books and E-book Pricing: An Economic Analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Willingness to pay; Library of Congress Classification; Advertising; Economics; Business; Marketing; Library science; Computer science; Library classification; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.02529517866386153,"score_gpt":0.21556276205388833,"score_spread":0.1902675833900268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072649556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9284965,0.0017928681,0.0031507304,0.009988424,0.00051293336,0.000366107,0.0000023900177,0.00006909385,0.055620987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98913866,0.000047239846,0.0012071932,0.0051005906,0.0024436724,0.000006302403,0.000010891765,0.000032068587,0.0020133625],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987066,0.000018810204,0.0005816587,0.00021697966,0.00022788445,0.00024807005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984682,0.00011439644,0.00059169566,0.00017076427,0.0005872165,0.00006768011],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001166593,0.00015786989,0.0003546086,0.0010799905,0.00026301504,0.06406683,0.00056179584,0.00011618756,0.0021089322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006829792,0.00011386503,0.0001966271,0.00031860732,0.000034933182,0.29187387,0.00018771525,0.00051727955,0.000032274158],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021652255,0.00012187411,0.079147995,0.0001558329,0.0011183859,0.0000086807,0.00047717057,0.0001418504,0.0017323091,0.005371648,0.86749125,0.044016503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020285093,0.00021410684,0.060630266,0.000117981785,0.0012648649,0.000026390378,0.0010768981,0.11860316,0.00040229375,0.023468917,0.7915003,0.0006663562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025706846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001863242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22780704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036155732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006187836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99880326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073954718","doi":"10.1353/scp.2007.0032","title":"The Changing College and University Library Market for University Press Books and Journals: 1997–2004","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic library; Work (physics); Library science; Academic community; Profit (economics); Sociology; Political science; Management; Economics; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.0345659091901103,"score_gpt":0.21634261795433551,"score_spread":0.18177670876422522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073954718","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61248976,0.03630272,0.0023303227,0.08812151,0.0025273368,0.00079376844,0.00051559537,0.00018455616,0.25673446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9400962,0.0022526642,0.0024502194,0.0005799921,0.0014343176,2.6031844e-7,0.0000081538965,0.00003745419,0.053140745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856806,0.00025048776,0.00034016152,0.00013593664,0.0003818779,0.0003235071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970892,0.0010239901,0.00060347654,0.00020146235,0.0008333155,0.00024854357],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008156351,0.00012410205,0.00019213618,0.00050443324,0.0026246533,0.037713356,0.00096758024,0.000116594325,0.000019090417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013179572,0.00010013922,0.00009598883,0.0001364608,0.00019166755,0.10516992,0.00035138073,0.001376927,1.1947941e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012950428,0.000096781485,0.0052796616,0.000073669114,0.00036229644,0.00012256016,0.030703172,0.0000023155317,0.00007832412,0.5119006,0.41534302,0.034742575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009543187,0.000081015314,0.0030194058,0.00012764755,0.000057349225,0.00006336874,0.044598702,0.00006286212,0.000012313059,0.0017180592,0.9491826,0.00012234932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000045121866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001167905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5338396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010081995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013599933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073992884","doi":"10.3138/jsp.33.4.230","title":"Indexing: A Users' Perspective","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Search engine indexing; Perspective (graphical); Information retrieval; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.09174836135832885,"score_gpt":0.2505110224273292,"score_spread":0.15876266106900033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073992884","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12560081,0.0076599456,0.00013814916,0.07690398,0.0023237942,0.00012460412,0.000013409614,0.00012539388,0.7871099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98896146,0.00011531402,0.00085446093,0.0017820968,0.002063205,0.0000020072591,0.0000025037857,0.000028286098,0.0061906874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974823,0.00028308763,0.00068770867,0.00017340432,0.0010327186,0.00034075137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99348253,0.00025236892,0.0008226816,0.00042105062,0.004676274,0.00034508848],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039422456,0.00016658918,0.00028501998,0.0007587869,0.0006946081,0.12290476,0.0017803349,0.00014885992,0.0027556526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013447938,0.00014125912,0.00022258275,0.00022025526,0.00013201337,0.23177913,0.00017639117,0.0033746953,0.000047427093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032481134,0.0002954796,0.0023343544,0.000011170487,0.0001940477,0.000039422812,0.13523996,0.000012668438,0.00015964104,0.593657,0.25907284,0.008950911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010084952,0.00021186954,0.0011803891,0.00014841212,0.000059433372,0.00011458698,0.042369828,0.00016468941,0.000020880565,0.017974416,0.9364707,0.00027628648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024378338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000107089574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86336064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038564813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001225085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99892455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075387374","doi":"10.3138/jsp.34.4.236","title":"Does Peer Review Process Exist in Developing-Country Journals?: The Bangladesh Experience","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Gender, Education, and Development Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Dhaka; UNICEF","keywords":"Peer review; Incentive; Technical peer review; Process (computing); Quality (philosophy); Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.07332631223317083,"score_gpt":0.38013566566805485,"score_spread":0.306809353434884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075387374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41137603,0.07498773,0.00043271878,0.38053265,0.0069578243,0.00065298943,0.0000027993851,0.000047687274,0.12500957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9438391,0.03336352,0.004382161,0.008858871,0.00121164,0.000019747305,0.0000024348258,0.000025841033,0.008296701],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950313,0.00055210624,0.00093189144,0.00018882607,0.002857342,0.00043856355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934931,0.0002447762,0.00082155596,0.00017103023,0.005045695,0.0002238574],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021494577,0.00014726867,0.0002922842,0.00027163568,0.0010076682,0.016749997,0.0013200203,0.00014192294,0.0003211385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026205035,0.00008098627,0.00007989324,0.0015548171,0.00013200869,0.04727768,0.00002515171,0.0012629293,0.0000036047174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014249347,0.0001643491,0.46372086,0.00028412047,0.00005787296,0.000043271306,0.40106693,0.000007596907,0.000026105017,0.056945898,0.0738331,0.003835666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019866842,0.000008600665,0.041340116,0.0015261123,0.00001344859,0.000040770505,0.15365982,1.2748656e-7,0.00006207591,0.016026955,0.78694886,0.0001744448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002626347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006956813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71311575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037517445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031423513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9842707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079336455","doi":"10.3138/jsp.46.2.04","title":"The Future of Emerging Spanish Scientific Communication Journals","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Advertising and Communication Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific communication; Delphi method; Delphi; Scientific literature; Data science; Scholarly communication; Political science; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Computer science; Publishing; Library science; Biology; Engineering","score_opus":0.04002087199753513,"score_gpt":0.336231486834651,"score_spread":0.29621061483711586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079336455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41676933,0.11487456,0.0040905206,0.38376898,0.004651605,0.00019022854,0.000002813959,0.000058700713,0.07559327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99160767,0.0045913933,0.0022885345,0.00019181964,0.00068658276,8.2395155e-7,4.7917024e-7,0.0000073126257,0.0006253972],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99644053,0.0012245437,0.00070282124,0.000079046775,0.0013351087,0.00021795393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929895,0.000858184,0.0014491549,0.0004944814,0.004087064,0.000121607074],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.025404872,0.00006969687,0.00019023486,0.00019884281,0.0044679022,0.022441331,0.0023295775,0.00009504378,0.00001636471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009075514,0.000049080776,0.00013258176,0.000739546,0.00046211874,0.025175385,0.00023607833,0.0012056527,0.0000020910413],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003875236,0.00010845795,0.033897743,0.000013101162,0.00017035445,9.39075e-7,0.06534228,0.00006806574,0.0010772914,0.21793546,0.07127194,0.61007565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021042094,0.0000213447,0.012312437,0.00017190498,0.0000243988,0.0000060578327,0.05142846,0.000020164378,0.000046641668,0.022113368,0.91357625,0.000068531466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010433864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047028883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84230435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000093295355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025696587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079772095","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44-4-001","title":"Defining and Characterizing Open Peer Review: A Review of the Literature","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Publishing; Peer review; Technical peer review; Open peer review; Computer science; Publication; Implementation; Review article; Public relations; Data science; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Social science; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.6022083722763935,"score_gpt":0.58024556048121,"score_spread":0.021962811795183446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079772095","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000009425609,0.97417283,0.000008798195,0.020681283,0.0010693562,0.0011120627,0.00009569392,0.0000028742397,0.0028476487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000015967804,0.9920339,0.0013907169,0.003424951,0.00025494973,0.000017196344,0.000012683251,0.00003174285,0.0028322807],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9659871,0.002737003,0.0052763303,0.0007475151,0.024658743,0.0005933407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86870646,0.011515637,0.019442579,0.0028587691,0.09625202,0.0012245434],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.22200143,0.00041838142,0.003776189,0.025240159,0.00034238095,0.21007971,0.019179245,0.00050336134,0.00034783612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6128046,0.0001884233,0.0013104562,0.14087096,0.00011876045,0.09038859,0.007037405,0.0062937113,0.00003288775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.01267e-7,0.000018373656,0.00015926456,0.027495304,0.00004942269,0.000010119969,0.000028114799,3.6614705e-9,7.139461e-7,0.0001414821,0.27355298,0.6985434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008598256,0.000035622936,0.0001956761,0.3534061,0.00015742768,0.00043986057,0.000017770693,3.768795e-7,3.0762976e-7,0.00023268849,0.645299,0.00012915439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016523769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.898297e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69841427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020601705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018999081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080978144","doi":"10.3138/jsp.42.1.45","title":"Journal Identity in the Digital Age","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership","field":"Nursing","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Digital identity; Genealogy; Sociology; Computer science; History; Aesthetics; Art; Computer security","score_opus":0.03754381117734751,"score_gpt":0.32538461934463103,"score_spread":0.2878408081672835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080978144","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8707989,0.0003524895,0.00009331249,0.10813817,0.011643117,0.00006591124,0.0000012166145,0.00001143095,0.008895495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916772,0.0000079322035,0.0010187376,0.0025346787,0.0046083974,5.4642436e-7,0.0000018678347,0.000021259115,0.00012935737],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99691826,0.00038573885,0.00073941314,0.00013047594,0.0014681267,0.00035795927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970039,0.0006398032,0.00096748286,0.00027472107,0.0008997919,0.0002142939],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013118212,0.00013584398,0.00020476975,0.000605259,0.0004216827,0.12981422,0.0017479756,0.00021082304,0.00006234516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020456906,0.00009695021,0.00017292531,0.00072374183,0.00009418765,0.19024083,0.00001752318,0.008797833,0.000014818283],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012173223,0.0023145305,0.3789842,0.000088756475,0.00016923285,0.0010621989,0.14235665,0.000023759174,0.014724655,0.009442168,0.24782725,0.20178927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015257493,0.00025599252,0.613647,0.00022968744,0.000097150514,0.008143691,0.042097937,0.0000052711684,0.00017323435,0.038346637,0.29520637,0.00027127634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000045886165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017243743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2346628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014618918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025434615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9934889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081928769","doi":"10.3138/jsp.42.2.105","title":"Protocols and Challenges to the Creation of a Cross-Disciplinary Journal","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Diverse Educational Innovations Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Audience measurement; Discipline; Sustainability; Public relations; Political science; Cross disciplinary; Tracking (education); Business; Sociology; Computer science; Data science; Ecology","score_opus":0.12353492437775666,"score_gpt":0.34976302619775657,"score_spread":0.22622810181999992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081928769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88802063,0.00036901384,0.0000029110008,0.108927235,0.00034513505,0.00049639883,0.0000058859023,0.0000033575777,0.0018294277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963675,0.00011693295,0.0014881578,0.00024053194,0.0015905952,0.00005050541,0.0000010877711,8.7098135e-7,0.00014382586],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988311,0.000055547123,0.00040271963,0.00008267456,0.0005154422,0.00011254388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960307,0.00025304165,0.0005296971,0.00004232721,0.0030514568,0.00009281408],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033930037,0.00006635284,0.00012337686,0.00006424661,0.00046396386,0.0075184335,0.0005237428,0.00006907205,0.00006683217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004265964,0.000021615746,0.000053069354,0.00036610945,0.00007900563,0.016369002,0.00015612948,0.0008310814,0.0000017127037],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022519549,0.0005715411,0.33656245,0.00006170907,0.00018006684,0.000011033487,0.007574499,0.0000337298,0.23196775,0.037924204,0.025602767,0.35928506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119414035,0.00024181497,0.88712174,0.000085056425,0.000007561661,0.0001400861,0.003485547,0.0000013977731,0.00022682176,0.0031113885,0.1054072,0.000051997366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001006932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000066517845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5505593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019925077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005042626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99738854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082071475","doi":"10.3138/jsp.32.2.113","title":"Personalities in Publishing: John Vickers","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Reformation and Early Modern Christianity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Archivist; Publishing; Classics; History; Christianity; Library science; Art; Literature; Archaeology; Computer science","score_opus":0.0644169985511978,"score_gpt":0.24501511166213732,"score_spread":0.18059811311093954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082071475","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.625662,0.0008711333,0.00012482936,0.024109446,0.0013295132,0.000076688215,0.000012279772,0.00004312819,0.347771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99051523,0.0001255598,0.00021937651,0.0024000602,0.0018692485,0.0000016508008,0.000009128641,0.000020977364,0.0048387754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973237,0.00015889763,0.00089936284,0.00014115158,0.0011047656,0.00037212775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971438,0.00011665349,0.00063967716,0.00016621716,0.0016954226,0.00023824297],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003960027,0.00016675211,0.00031522103,0.00089569465,0.00033275015,0.103080176,0.0008388374,0.00014698267,0.0016877787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029571713,0.00013330615,0.0001769459,0.0002063815,0.00011372325,0.24395494,0.00008389683,0.0022059705,0.00003202652],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035720898,0.00041655768,0.09849642,0.00011377274,0.00020386888,0.00046789853,0.29484677,0.0001044914,0.00008905042,0.30673474,0.26971036,0.028458856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011760852,0.00008960168,0.015950903,0.00017509844,0.000015649874,0.00019523597,0.048905447,0.0001384225,0.0000074844834,0.007844178,0.9252779,0.0002240153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001042841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009351097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6555675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025938937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022387854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082129539","doi":"10.3138/jsp.33.4.248","title":"Personalities in Publishing: Jeremy Wilson","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Modernist Literature and Criticism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Art history; The Internet; Web site; Sociology; Art; Classics; Computer science; World Wide Web; Literature","score_opus":0.08737168522048731,"score_gpt":0.2302017860085526,"score_spread":0.1428301007880653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082129539","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30345622,0.012685064,0.0000562448,0.071235925,0.002631455,0.00011764931,0.000036127527,0.000057295354,0.60972404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9742946,0.00007480893,0.00029179358,0.004280675,0.003602098,0.0000026400096,0.000005531157,0.000028751392,0.017419083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972802,0.00016535075,0.0008281957,0.00019753764,0.0011055587,0.00042319644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997557,0.00018487507,0.00042320363,0.00019306844,0.0014254777,0.00021637756],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002409834,0.0001974144,0.00036432908,0.00073637214,0.000301439,0.14855693,0.00089342234,0.00018446549,0.0032380954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024566823,0.00016377209,0.00020553282,0.00014638499,0.00011671854,0.19824032,0.000079001074,0.0027999,0.00002070589],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037371792,0.00023645641,0.0032641606,0.00007024841,0.00006825171,0.00026184606,0.17034216,0.000004536191,0.0000881923,0.5236021,0.29078242,0.011242196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000912718,0.0001167297,0.000733441,0.00032713212,0.000027326267,0.00012681159,0.019121282,0.000123198,0.000013512235,0.014309851,0.9639531,0.00023492826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018279518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023695178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6731706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014420177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000579066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995007},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2082182552","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44.3.004","title":"The Barriers to Producing High Quality Library and Information Science Research in Developing Countries: The Case of Pakistan","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Health Sciences Research and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Variety (cybernetics); Production (economics); Developing country; Business; Test (biology); Order (exchange); Set (abstract data type); Public relations; Psychology; Marketing; Knowledge management; Political science; Economic growth; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.1527014161897371,"score_gpt":0.5022971991988459,"score_spread":0.34959578300910876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082182552","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7627669,0.00012826895,0.00003702935,0.23511165,0.0004562439,0.00053749926,0.0000021723515,0.000003744647,0.0009564904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99437344,0.00038480503,0.0013943193,0.0035452163,0.00022199232,0.000034452976,4.6295534e-7,0.0000040139557,0.000041290627],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948142,0.0016362079,0.001247057,0.00013596383,0.001446041,0.00072050455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891205,0.0042758603,0.0007163378,0.00035362717,0.0046912148,0.00084246515],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07682518,0.00006045231,0.00013874599,0.0009260029,0.004189164,0.0103524,0.0010277511,0.00008052539,0.000034640394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04810964,0.000032205648,0.000013963436,0.0033322934,0.00037245458,0.1886129,0.0004071549,0.0024798433,0.000007768431],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020594815,0.000023189052,0.47101676,0.0009141487,0.000013842035,0.000019083944,0.23270419,0.000035060937,0.00059946696,0.20137069,0.053561155,0.039536476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029179748,0.000095416864,0.627017,0.00061358314,0.0000010349584,0.000036741014,0.31511444,0.000058739683,0.00009717103,0.004278911,0.052326992,0.0000681823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045301747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020294829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23160654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039026042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012176729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082561485","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0074","title":"Sticker Shock and Looming Tsunami: The High Cost of Academic Serials in Perspective","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Recession; Productivity; Shock (circulatory); Perspective (graphical); Public relations; Great recession; Political science; Business; Economics; Economic growth; Law; Computer science; Macroeconomics; Medicine","score_opus":0.3750347787922275,"score_gpt":0.5282241506211722,"score_spread":0.1531893718289447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082561485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97990483,0.0012612153,0.0004924053,0.015760219,0.001172023,0.00016118976,0.000012885518,0.000002844909,0.0012324005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974507,0.00024916368,0.0015032064,0.00025438878,0.00037183604,0.0000014220092,2.0563103e-7,0.00000921689,0.00015987629],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98834515,0.0005120505,0.001513529,0.0003585732,0.008826686,0.0004440116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97269696,0.010448476,0.0015645751,0.0004947179,0.014330029,0.00046526367],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10645326,0.00012241435,0.00043994802,0.031091265,0.0002079261,0.04085354,0.0038611079,0.00030059842,0.00016653824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4012491,0.000068030604,0.00010005054,0.055544402,0.000247679,0.047999702,0.0008858922,0.0048159035,0.000005465467],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014310158,0.00013171387,0.8082104,0.0000073019646,0.000048494683,0.000045758003,0.0027685803,0.00008713938,0.092630625,0.018514443,0.0096897045,0.06772274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001126529,0.0001706464,0.93134207,0.00005325684,0.000014157139,0.00013594823,0.008344287,0.0005488373,0.0014849656,0.049921244,0.006720311,0.00013772264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030449135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007845053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29479584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015623597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051360216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99748003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083313064","doi":"10.3138/jsp.42.1.16","title":"Blog to the Future?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Wikis in Education and Collaboration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Scholarly communication; Publishing; Subject (documents); Tipping point (physics); Computer science; World Wide Web; Point (geometry); Set (abstract data type); Data science; Public relations; Knowledge management; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.015824996336103295,"score_gpt":0.3148877412924608,"score_spread":0.2990627449563575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083313064","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46621275,0.00014663953,0.000121468394,0.4759907,0.010778062,0.000073236,8.405497e-7,0.000012085366,0.0466642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97421473,0.000030462816,0.0033620526,0.0058449777,0.014981691,0.0000021266953,3.6231881e-7,0.0000054527472,0.0015581544],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985256,0.00017139569,0.00024427645,0.00006540129,0.0008450474,0.00014823102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969984,0.00010726495,0.0002475399,0.00013868886,0.0022945926,0.00021350189],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007232914,0.000043697422,0.00006852416,0.00015136276,0.00068523164,0.026876977,0.0009218158,0.00011768832,0.0002622507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006881589,0.000029462884,0.00004674691,0.00081034185,0.000041253486,0.03159356,0.000032455213,0.0013370336,0.000025995958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015943888,0.00007201169,0.015259744,0.0000014531822,0.000019050343,0.0000029875252,0.042069964,0.000008785912,0.0021969595,0.36144006,0.5018101,0.07710298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000072243754,0.00001463099,0.01300437,0.0000049959212,0.000005533465,0.0000052127903,0.030103097,7.653263e-7,0.000040822306,0.0034286645,0.95328027,0.00003936653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000935794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028697962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.508002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006723019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008396535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98195106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083361644","doi":"10.1353/scp.2007.0027","title":"Authority 3.0: Friend or Foe to Scholars?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0338765884333175,"score_gpt":0.27852824977262075,"score_spread":0.24465166133930324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083361644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6449759,0.000755771,0.28608724,0.047337245,0.004376905,0.00015747616,0.0000026610812,0.00015406412,0.01615274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7414564,0.000010650507,0.24928185,0.006937195,0.0014307521,6.64362e-7,6.81887e-7,0.000018520665,0.00086327636],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967214,0.00013751542,0.00084476714,0.0003161087,0.001437181,0.00054305955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965411,0.0003009145,0.00054535427,0.0005283541,0.001209356,0.00087494054],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009656929,0.00017852975,0.000296834,0.0008724498,0.00030726352,0.06608115,0.004516877,0.0002074643,0.00006854314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029967765,0.00013392317,0.00014426021,0.00192785,0.000016545002,0.3096907,0.0007642048,0.0021479581,0.00003759566],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073259993,0.0007029784,0.11071547,0.00012881446,0.00031847303,0.0033960412,0.016584639,0.00014185638,0.012508677,0.26769584,0.13095842,0.45611617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001187199,0.0007399873,0.23110253,0.0002478919,0.000020662234,0.0007732184,0.0012766502,0.0002127596,0.0032512392,0.010906432,0.7497919,0.0004895289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000039726245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035012385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6188335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010604027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039245456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93488836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083450127","doi":"10.3138/jsp.33.2.75","title":"Basic Advice for Novice Authors","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Advice (programming); Publication; Library science; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.08618037123966439,"score_gpt":0.2560323911885349,"score_spread":0.1698520199488705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083450127","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32616085,0.010165172,0.0016064027,0.16425952,0.008842985,0.0006007014,0.000117647294,0.00043682393,0.4878099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976378,0.00008936689,0.004979428,0.0028161488,0.0028396186,0.000010148316,0.000013933189,0.000048944526,0.012824365],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746585,0.00022386684,0.00090288057,0.00019088127,0.0008524323,0.00036407672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936461,0.00055835437,0.0009929605,0.00045484398,0.004074251,0.00027348066],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00598283,0.00018171474,0.00031396226,0.00062430627,0.0008922159,0.10396881,0.0019653542,0.00017965853,0.00079233974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009382243,0.00015636634,0.00027407872,0.00019876302,0.00008326834,0.19609913,0.00012940964,0.0023731524,0.00003271645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006866209,0.00031974507,0.0018479062,0.000061654195,0.00018125786,0.000009155225,0.038552362,0.000023928553,0.0002813534,0.18542185,0.72567457,0.047557537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009637612,0.00018804407,0.00048692207,0.000119902965,0.00006751705,0.000049906583,0.0039741807,0.00061988714,0.000016296917,0.005469656,0.9878357,0.00020821432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013487598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014300978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6502172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015646896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008387505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083751439","doi":"10.3138/jsp.33.1.53","title":"Surviving the Review Process","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Writing and Publishing","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scrutiny; Reading (process); Advice (programming); Sociology; Public relations; Library science; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05872984386233662,"score_gpt":0.2766179999713418,"score_spread":0.21788815610900517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083751439","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.135432,0.11675991,0.00020106164,0.28263217,0.0034497303,0.0002756333,0.000009661867,0.00012137482,0.46111843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9567874,0.006974746,0.00011049287,0.020082647,0.010856507,0.0000048546067,0.0000042086253,0.000042050142,0.005137068],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972389,0.00025052848,0.00084473484,0.00013888138,0.0011966767,0.00033032082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954464,0.00044944495,0.0009824828,0.00020897719,0.0027570669,0.00015563179],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012569308,0.00014721543,0.00030707475,0.00018945706,0.0007423638,0.044241134,0.0016073339,0.00009706122,0.00083389657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01287166,0.00008806194,0.00018162328,0.00024038588,0.0001027104,0.10291721,0.00009605376,0.0033797806,0.000013650376],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030661828,0.000085084546,0.015592798,0.00066426635,0.00014689221,0.00010383426,0.03317759,0.000019442172,0.000031992076,0.075185835,0.8145253,0.060436282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002031482,0.000033922013,0.00059146027,0.0028200038,0.000065583954,0.00038557412,0.009232405,0.00001291129,0.000003006385,0.0040288344,0.9824831,0.00014005674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010373943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000049416434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8213554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059591734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019169756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084152693","doi":"10.3138/jsp.34.3.153","title":"A Few Memories of Gerald Trett","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Artistic and Creative Research","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychoanalysis; Management; Art history; History; Philosophy; Sociology; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.07293107730372414,"score_gpt":0.27781045989236375,"score_spread":0.2048793825886396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084152693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21119228,0.0024147453,0.0005860641,0.0036988975,0.0003435313,0.0000751597,0.000015384165,0.000012545811,0.7816614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904704,0.00005335652,0.0008149668,0.00019430608,0.00053596124,9.4297195e-7,8.672679e-7,0.000012451709,0.007916753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818826,0.00018734024,0.0005174655,0.00008709425,0.00080042746,0.00021943508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970352,0.00022977428,0.00042627528,0.00012211897,0.0020398307,0.00014677765],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024710721,0.00009420733,0.0002695154,0.00027321954,0.0002567468,0.009398556,0.00036539024,0.000055034998,0.0032068158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004368319,0.00006868409,0.00013571468,0.00009596246,0.00021394623,0.030665271,0.000038922928,0.0008693555,0.000008969947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004542153,0.00009138355,0.004183248,0.000034721077,0.00011270671,0.00003436405,0.0097186975,0.0000017621581,0.00036670867,0.9348264,0.046601173,0.0039834506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010749882,0.00046273964,0.0027272033,0.00022163976,0.0000664215,0.000088009976,0.049299676,0.000010710473,0.0018516849,0.029767456,0.9142316,0.00019785449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000061313054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034542194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9050589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054346023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023182448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086184410","doi":"10.3138/jsp.45.3.003","title":"The Predictive Value of Disruptive Technology Theory for Digital Publishing in the Traditional Publishing Environment: A South African Case Study","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Digitization; Electronic publishing; Context (archaeology); Marketing; State (computer science); Economics; Advertising; Sociology; Public relations; Business; Computer science; Political science; The Internet; Telecommunications; World Wide Web; History; Law","score_opus":0.025734621410723888,"score_gpt":0.21427592431417714,"score_spread":0.18854130290345325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086184410","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78551143,0.00042348998,0.16780746,0.027584525,0.0006698825,0.0010202196,0.000054277374,0.00007586098,0.01685287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99690646,0.000003695555,0.0023046914,0.00028793438,0.00030679835,0.000046359874,0.0000036144213,0.000016095502,0.00012436765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960101,0.0005527927,0.0010404263,0.00037207679,0.0015846089,0.0004399979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99326575,0.004280655,0.0012224661,0.00046124728,0.0006132845,0.00015657695],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011435321,0.0002218743,0.00032801696,0.0013163022,0.00076981063,0.13204521,0.004160953,0.00018334936,0.0000026038763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019590495,0.00013302093,0.00019190517,0.0021766669,0.00020036643,0.2483453,0.00063329935,0.0018045052,4.925973e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050288514,0.0013911302,0.08039765,0.000029574187,0.0005743986,0.0004957297,0.11454086,0.0010610811,0.000019003794,0.65466064,0.0053371317,0.14098991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00609447,0.0033298102,0.037130248,0.00022570873,0.00009144428,0.0036413348,0.34056285,0.007755898,0.00006862406,0.5641158,0.0362974,0.00068639795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000114515005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000053735407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22602199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017420747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035696293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9886679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087221627","doi":"10.1353/scp.2012.0012","title":"Sustainability and the Scholarly Enterprise: A History of Gutenberg-e","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Publishing; Sustainability; Scholarly communication; Political science; Sociology; History; Library science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.041026252509274,"score_gpt":0.22570818577420318,"score_spread":0.18468193326492918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087221627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.750809,0.022846293,0.00003968648,0.008288093,0.0032339958,0.00025228225,0.000016689646,0.000027208294,0.21448675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851327,0.000074039446,0.000083002524,0.0010211479,0.0014296202,0.000003775322,0.0000015458374,0.000022137616,0.012232035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997267,0.00032851295,0.0009290344,0.00013140157,0.0009419102,0.0004021505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99437106,0.000474529,0.00095012167,0.00030835235,0.0036323115,0.00026364412],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0089241145,0.00018886324,0.0004444236,0.00032746562,0.00028762003,0.029557917,0.00087427674,0.000106040665,0.00044493575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073129805,0.00012019202,0.00028486367,0.00006246767,0.0008744455,0.20896618,0.00026506107,0.0019208706,0.0000026199746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033273443,0.00019984679,0.009953598,0.00010661456,0.0001526939,0.000008404957,0.120953195,5.9347605e-7,0.00001946782,0.8309068,0.030546278,0.0068197493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019217223,0.00016936593,0.0062704463,0.0001217003,0.0001182497,0.000084393934,0.040901236,0.0000044942617,0.000006605402,0.030398432,0.9198079,0.00019541784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002629691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000043529442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88926166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005753782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036020603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9714495},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2087636402","doi":"10.3138/jsp.32.4.182","title":"The Characteristics of the Ideal Acquisition Editor","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Ideal (ethics); Publishing; Management; Sociology; Media studies; Library science; Political science; Law; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.028654203206882965,"score_gpt":0.232992741761231,"score_spread":0.20433853855434803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087636402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8704154,0.0024610169,0.000104046136,0.068678044,0.02034649,0.00015918163,0.000029735915,0.00003516393,0.03777094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859661,0.00024065499,0.000087664775,0.00063535763,0.011590309,0.0000018068326,0.0000046174964,0.0000149967655,0.0014584846],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973964,0.00037773146,0.0008507928,0.00008655871,0.0010717575,0.00021672601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99416846,0.0004930354,0.0014920937,0.00051862944,0.003234962,0.00009279289],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00608282,0.000111747475,0.0001984688,0.00014871673,0.0013189068,0.05668523,0.0023365149,0.00010581113,0.0000838581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056407107,0.000060480168,0.0002067091,0.00016544758,0.00020501627,0.06812137,0.00023463287,0.0020514654,0.0000041907574],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025148565,0.000263723,0.048087414,0.0000305922,0.00025304977,0.000010359226,0.023407893,0.000008356275,0.0015650009,0.25186414,0.61578625,0.058471743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032175914,0.000069566595,0.05885306,0.00013364412,0.000040901257,0.00004079667,0.0029786923,0.000023163571,0.000031044296,0.005752348,0.9316672,0.00008780906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012888518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008373126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31588095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001042388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019659924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087838973","doi":"10.3138/jsp.33.2.90","title":"Serials Prices and Subscriptions in the Social Sciences","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Publishing; Field (mathematics); Social science; Sociology; Advertising; Economics; Business; Political science; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.08922164638640656,"score_gpt":0.26247920552896836,"score_spread":0.1732575591425618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087838973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86975974,0.0016734651,0.001353844,0.06690897,0.00045287528,0.00007114479,4.8104715e-7,0.000022782842,0.059756692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920742,0.00007841282,0.0055531934,0.0017676575,0.00023655445,0.0000012060859,6.922816e-8,0.0000020894395,0.0002866273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986737,0.00010789949,0.0003111015,0.00010928547,0.0006477475,0.00015030583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931705,0.00019011098,0.00024119546,0.000059518425,0.00014958536,0.000042535925],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025728443,0.000059930313,0.00010158994,0.0004409149,0.0005091833,0.07408247,0.0013265607,0.000046438257,0.000016861235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094688043,0.000037625417,0.000036607897,0.0014325265,0.000059669535,0.15509412,0.00014745626,0.00038189828,0.0000018608208],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021850276,0.00040333808,0.17923063,0.00002651023,0.00006910974,0.00013780473,0.08593695,0.000045159617,0.0010206742,0.33427018,0.2854235,0.11341431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016508854,0.00038413442,0.51131237,0.000116802934,0.000010114408,0.0006999334,0.007843652,0.0016089611,0.0002073665,0.05422084,0.42149648,0.00044844425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000050041863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003065018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33208174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021335127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000067704685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9268787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089282441","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0009","title":"Ranking the Management Journals","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Accounting Education and Careers","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Listing (finance); Ranking (information retrieval); Rank (graph theory); Computer science; Work (physics); Information retrieval; Data science; Business; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.04227592760833569,"score_gpt":0.2475681756193948,"score_spread":0.2052922480110591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089282441","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7552946,0.002167302,0.0017308285,0.073550776,0.0049834787,0.00020600889,5.526865e-7,0.00007972665,0.16198671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9761546,0.00012817372,0.0008815757,0.016505122,0.0055309096,0.0000023845598,0.0000014129092,0.00002599916,0.0007698092],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974778,0.000026359176,0.0006612315,0.00013309055,0.0014141316,0.00028732818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99640846,0.000068327674,0.0012086694,0.00024133056,0.002042262,0.000030976327],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00506921,0.0001420102,0.00019908148,0.0007260914,0.0008019644,0.031871833,0.0013708401,0.000084267274,0.00031266443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013546139,0.00009432363,0.00020538895,0.0010044839,0.00005727698,0.098796956,0.00021937338,0.0012886658,0.00007101657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007260638,0.0001686046,0.18765846,0.00011402247,0.00037821956,0.00027758855,0.0011681785,0.00021894848,0.00026803208,0.029145584,0.73583925,0.04469049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092382554,0.0000073322262,0.18689305,0.00021418575,0.00012924799,0.00039288902,0.0041517373,0.00006789432,0.000011445612,0.004999649,0.80200267,0.00020611152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004173519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003934239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22085999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009625921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007444196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9691332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089389885","doi":"10.3138/jsp.33.4.189","title":"Scholarly Book Publishing in Australia: The Impact of the Last Decade","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Per capita; Liberian dollar; Population; Economy; Australian population; Geography; Economics; Political science; Agricultural economics; Economic history; Demography; Sociology; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.09758395127499822,"score_gpt":0.2848332862125782,"score_spread":0.18724933493757998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089389885","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90951866,0.006876039,0.000013159657,0.03818442,0.0013329134,0.00026608942,0.000037293437,0.00003560499,0.04373582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937473,0.00017568932,0.000128801,0.0010485834,0.0011805479,0.000005923375,0.000004432895,0.000039497227,0.0036692335],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943368,0.0011858209,0.0016808797,0.00026210424,0.001926224,0.000608173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992206,0.0007580911,0.0020898387,0.0011497282,0.0035488177,0.0002475404],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0115437275,0.00031926442,0.00051458844,0.00089612365,0.0009797161,0.22225662,0.0064008604,0.00034649795,0.0010062956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020053945,0.00017626301,0.0006843668,0.00085252157,0.00036061386,0.41829878,0.00062452914,0.009692171,0.000015583008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009198549,0.00075259246,0.18371285,0.00004760116,0.00049658713,0.0000308907,0.08310565,0.0006870286,0.0013260888,0.051442277,0.66787773,0.010428676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038939402,0.00053943443,0.47135156,0.0014650528,0.00019135118,0.0003392604,0.015380841,0.0005183891,0.00018895103,0.014018212,0.4912959,0.00081708655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030563534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010820798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28763872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056760706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029106598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089560665","doi":"10.1353/scp.2011.0003","title":"The Peer-Review Process for Articles in Iran's Scientific Journals","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Originality; Peer review; Process (computing); Creativity; Psychology; Scientific literature; Population; Political science; Computer science; Medicine; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.8410412911769377,"score_gpt":0.5958931120667178,"score_spread":0.2451481791102199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089560665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7660072,0.098097004,0.0045264866,0.119699776,0.0040704496,0.0007858593,0.000024204208,0.00001311972,0.0067759226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99300194,0.0016784576,0.0017534478,0.00069657795,0.00026098406,0.000010974113,5.502991e-7,0.00001469458,0.0025823894],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9703838,0.0005340309,0.0025103772,0.0004439707,0.02529806,0.00082975155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87528545,0.010432526,0.003492553,0.0011914548,0.10838553,0.0012125182],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.34913608,0.00013607599,0.00043845698,0.033385433,0.00091967866,0.18415508,0.007937227,0.00012731536,0.00019936924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.61063856,0.00006998172,0.0003379329,0.116924934,0.0002147634,0.08281742,0.00039869756,0.00173954,0.000022668499],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011593752,0.00030487776,0.23870221,0.000064079635,0.00003846288,0.000047914727,0.0018694242,0.0000127665,0.00066617655,0.001371544,0.28726864,0.469538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018479186,0.00045817532,0.29586112,0.0010489869,0.000038260278,0.000259633,0.0062898146,0.0006675558,0.0015623254,0.24656138,0.4450629,0.0003419168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017983677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000043910008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46919608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014732296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006885723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090692246","doi":"10.3138/ex3q-575u-1276-4423","title":"Subject Indexes to Poetry: <i>Historical : (</i>See <i>Patriotism.)</i>","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patriotism; Poetry; Subject (documents); Literature; History; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Sociology; Art; Computer science; Political science; Law; World Wide Web; Politics","score_opus":0.048486829298753274,"score_gpt":0.23900917954241593,"score_spread":0.19052235024366265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090692246","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6310521,0.0017673725,0.00041674756,0.006518959,0.005882814,0.00016614409,0.00002451316,0.00009059873,0.3540808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97085357,0.000015200071,0.0005344007,0.004749477,0.005548978,0.0000011526205,0.0000037513514,0.000051181003,0.018242283],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962149,0.000079511374,0.001191674,0.00025618525,0.0015858284,0.00067187846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995934,0.0003600228,0.0005981287,0.00028416907,0.0021483493,0.00067529536],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062205354,0.00027177803,0.0004763698,0.0010412869,0.00058951136,0.06100974,0.0012922764,0.00017728115,0.0006668003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031109252,0.00023107391,0.0003345222,0.0002803372,0.00008169331,0.08437665,0.00021113592,0.0023675456,0.00006778173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005598922,0.0004902923,0.018546209,0.00006708624,0.00022180588,0.000796176,0.04548246,0.0000110867595,0.0006463289,0.3470905,0.53282607,0.053262074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005761694,0.00051737507,0.003102622,0.00012703272,0.000038431164,0.00012421445,0.0059194425,3.1441132e-7,0.00009893993,0.005706406,0.98346895,0.00032012037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036284013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010227059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45064285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007579484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001844116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091278094","doi":"10.1353/scp.2012.0001","title":"When You’re Criticized","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Indian History and Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Subject (documents); Perception; Positive economics; Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Economics; Political science; Law; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08252366584021872,"score_gpt":0.24294240749470233,"score_spread":0.1604187416544836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091278094","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31252033,0.0065625184,0.00006238311,0.018082388,0.010052348,0.00010145487,0.000029873894,0.000052936357,0.65253574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98005795,0.000007818692,0.0005905769,0.003224601,0.012101292,0.0000010357264,0.0000029515227,0.000021683107,0.0039920784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842006,0.00012940458,0.00047990264,0.00007574209,0.0005730709,0.0003218435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998042,0.000105209874,0.0003688794,0.00014872843,0.0010498124,0.000285384],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025555298,0.00012071346,0.00022624247,0.0003410406,0.00050055695,0.015454274,0.00051063724,0.000096479,0.004097423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010612619,0.000099916695,0.00018159495,0.00004115173,0.00009175668,0.118189864,0.000045705136,0.0013789495,0.000086206455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008328121,0.00020260813,0.0032630933,0.000046314406,0.00011589369,0.00003691302,0.30255246,9.1094347e-7,0.00019070243,0.466298,0.22486424,0.0023455848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004482422,0.0000711624,0.00033238824,0.00006754794,0.00004763316,0.000048318485,0.0034156265,5.4128276e-7,0.000033863496,0.015168022,0.9802315,0.00013513172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035996447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001314813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7553673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011385401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007945326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99681294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091899896","doi":"10.1353/scp.2007.0029","title":"'An Inexhaustible Supply of Fresh Literature on the Civil War'","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"American History and Culture","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spanish Civil War; Publishing; Economic history; Political science; History; Classics; Law","score_opus":0.01518211465240622,"score_gpt":0.22017354341087175,"score_spread":0.20499142875846554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091899896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9286446,0.0016735982,0.00035901996,0.009225622,0.0010924969,0.000119177945,0.000005766344,0.000036395133,0.058843333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98821145,0.000014810447,0.00033789588,0.0076519917,0.003451361,6.293469e-7,0.000008196805,0.000020413907,0.00030326672],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818146,0.000030183755,0.0005380917,0.00014501937,0.0008519884,0.00025327795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968029,0.00010100276,0.0010876851,0.00027440864,0.0016902807,0.000043685934],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041804523,0.0001569922,0.00024336854,0.00047618538,0.0002868658,0.008592782,0.0010595825,0.00016118614,0.00036736127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018968164,0.00009627205,0.00015549215,0.0011226166,0.00007277303,0.07097369,0.000077036755,0.0018998148,0.00001218723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056723,0.000505644,0.060360383,0.0001722286,0.0001577788,0.0002638922,0.003489174,0.00023686765,0.026419548,0.068962425,0.82974887,0.009115937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011304223,0.0002295875,0.059080973,0.000972914,0.00013969507,0.000077321056,0.012299634,0.00005814323,0.0007675368,0.005561582,0.91926897,0.0004132303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055200977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004739198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.089520074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006151113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051978383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9924364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092602826","doi":"10.1353/scp.2005.0012","title":"The Thesis and the Book: A Guide for First-Time Academic Authors (review)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Subtitle; Advice (programming); Publication; Audience measurement; Sociology; Media studies; Library science; Art history; History; Art; Computer science; Philosophy; Linguistics; Law; Literature; Political science","score_opus":0.035564443381154186,"score_gpt":0.26700158151896297,"score_spread":0.23143713813780878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092602826","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053508016,0.3376354,0.0000698649,0.6319843,0.0005712802,0.00045211535,0.000014223659,0.00004201584,0.023880018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32568064,0.39123926,0.0063744783,0.1129336,0.021662815,0.00031022463,0.000036098485,0.0002607565,0.14150214],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971405,0.0005267214,0.0011047578,0.0001523618,0.0007494991,0.00032610848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931715,0.003136685,0.0011657861,0.00050497695,0.0018589204,0.0001621469],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.025180722,0.00017478532,0.00035333357,0.00015393445,0.0025441763,0.050029792,0.0024964788,0.000140105,0.00009850794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023964426,0.0000871861,0.00027939025,0.00009879521,0.0003451847,0.08546861,0.00024517035,0.0029025385,0.000010497251],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008172824,0.000016136255,0.000058103476,0.000035222783,0.00010425801,4.5728888e-7,0.006856236,0.000004195539,0.000014528334,0.093794934,0.8549722,0.044062026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095855637,0.000042843847,0.00023381527,0.00051497645,0.00013683722,0.00003862352,0.0011649203,0.00022744326,0.000005212647,0.0059921965,0.99056655,0.00011801535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005103056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012519163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5190507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011422541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015388642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092685291","doi":"10.3138/jsp.45.2.003","title":"From Communization to Commercialization: A Brief History of China's Publishing, 1949–1992","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Chinese history and philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; China; Commercialization; Period (music); Transition (genetics); Political science; Economy; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.04454492528807726,"score_gpt":0.2730378152473511,"score_spread":0.22849288995927383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092685291","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49966875,0.0039259153,0.0042828894,0.1498615,0.008146528,0.0005656648,0.000042477244,0.00010316166,0.3334031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899183,0.000029912564,0.0029607415,0.003455137,0.0026483543,0.0000039841175,0.000031140542,0.000026326521,0.0009261294],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962311,0.0008860375,0.00092497503,0.00017875138,0.0015400009,0.00023913803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950931,0.00031129978,0.001217357,0.00037080413,0.0025261904,0.00048121702],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045374897,0.00016028841,0.00041063663,0.00059287366,0.00049092714,0.014533376,0.001892122,0.00031726473,0.0008908225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012750165,0.00015899894,0.00017685517,0.0009067111,0.00018324457,0.12976354,0.00019938563,0.0014791891,0.000012108697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005703203,0.00025137444,0.029630732,0.000022260267,0.0000853006,0.000007801512,0.14221932,0.000111969435,0.0008964192,0.06157585,0.75590146,0.009240477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007089252,0.000100982645,0.0370853,0.00020691643,0.000043748474,0.000004545808,0.0021074608,0.000030181684,0.00001360401,0.07244158,0.8870175,0.00023924856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04548579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014535474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4902495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001299446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009875532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99556583},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2093015780","doi":"10.3138/jsp.46.1.005","title":"How to Be an Effective Peer Reviewer: Some Personal Thoughts","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Publishing; Subject (documents); Task (project management); Field (mathematics); Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Peer review; Technical peer review; Component (thermodynamics); Engineering ethics; Psychology; Library science; Management; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.03715804254656035,"score_gpt":0.2794601576469305,"score_spread":0.24230211510037014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093015780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61818564,0.0126832845,0.0010884876,0.26508862,0.007872604,0.00058234745,0.00006300718,0.00012249833,0.094313495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9533352,0.00006473414,0.0012493185,0.008780745,0.022981351,0.000010682612,0.000007923106,0.000044040644,0.013525982],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969351,0.00039678038,0.00045223444,0.0002513734,0.0016291155,0.00033535753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99385864,0.00022756327,0.0005477626,0.00026013184,0.0047992696,0.0003066526],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005971226,0.00022427765,0.0005576788,0.00048493163,0.0005683506,0.05262893,0.0008060263,0.000074515934,0.00023436049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014465447,0.00015755318,0.00033327274,0.0001328539,0.00012271682,0.09348552,0.0001524331,0.0011811495,0.000014665102],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008812519,0.00030521333,0.0011339698,0.00011030214,0.0011466716,0.0000808566,0.2171282,0.000014401417,0.00036962528,0.20850761,0.45350406,0.11761096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003865928,0.00042076583,0.0008906848,0.00020638022,0.00025324392,0.000018444169,0.034549493,0.000019882467,0.00006362732,0.0029888572,0.95995337,0.0002486557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044837638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000334064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50644934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011064155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038341455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093294860","doi":"10.1353/scp.2010.0010","title":"Will Peer Review Still Function and How?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Function (biology); Computer science; Biology; Evolutionary biology","score_opus":0.45391483462302057,"score_gpt":0.5089795111947684,"score_spread":0.055064676571747795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093294860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58936006,0.029926468,0.0062317927,0.36102864,0.005395697,0.00021805178,0.000016474172,0.000017728933,0.0078050965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837782,0.0030305088,0.003696824,0.0024977082,0.0008684949,0.0000011705467,0.0000013850026,0.000013057802,0.0061126603],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.976716,0.00027636424,0.0008281247,0.00036283725,0.021431295,0.00038538783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92975116,0.0035818033,0.0015111717,0.0006883927,0.063331105,0.001136343],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14968051,0.00012164218,0.0003809038,0.029226052,0.0002178535,0.17163287,0.002682065,0.00020692775,0.00046389407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5693828,0.00007455972,0.00017738655,0.062357523,0.00009413415,0.18132983,0.0005777543,0.003369855,0.000021719354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001804567,0.000054088225,0.12287838,0.00002573506,0.000022982129,0.000022726339,0.000049302354,6.041214e-7,0.004511091,0.0021962014,0.5482391,0.32198173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037460975,0.00015276572,0.1637974,0.00008896716,0.000018105353,0.00019735511,0.00015298018,0.00005554605,0.000032661796,0.013188847,0.8218424,0.0000983952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010745088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000071182576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41970226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051373776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029471228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093959383","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0091","title":"Creating a Consolidated Online Catalogue for the University Press Community","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scale (ratio); Library science; Business; World Wide Web; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.08000514333204856,"score_gpt":0.26109239108350046,"score_spread":0.1810872477514519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093959383","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.952801,0.0005867098,0.0006196472,0.01900622,0.0021910968,0.00029074916,0.00048726713,0.00008943192,0.023927871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945175,0.000039343693,0.0019496871,0.0005120265,0.0011334458,0.0000012883145,0.00013269878,0.000019394407,0.0016946098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982587,0.0004992379,0.0004821485,0.00009576239,0.00042988788,0.00023427118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992353,0.0023097438,0.0008217165,0.00064315106,0.0037211706,0.0001511926],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007444139,0.0001340609,0.00022533692,0.00020648846,0.0030848666,0.048947375,0.0029484085,0.00014918487,0.00005035038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012352559,0.00009655366,0.00017250939,0.000108643246,0.00026637033,0.083171286,0.0003141859,0.006551855,0.0000010068624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005072137,0.0012292885,0.0041890037,0.000106880674,0.0007705046,0.000018909235,0.14229913,0.00007189718,0.0051349658,0.59319955,0.22517245,0.027300186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009720838,0.00010757565,0.0042176116,0.000070576716,0.000117106836,0.00004595924,0.030961828,0.00033713525,0.000059941845,0.0010101108,0.9619537,0.00014639071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036481614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00449356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73678124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022860525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095067330","doi":"10.1353/scp.2011.0045","title":"World Social Science Report 2010: Knowledge Divides (review)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Globalization and Cultural Identity","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Globe; Government (linguistics); Social science; Political science; Sociology; Library science; Law; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.12473379948210216,"score_gpt":0.36100146817652445,"score_spread":0.23626766869442228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095067330","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026295273,0.011815674,0.00014439941,0.01298191,0.004452306,0.00016490814,0.0000019927445,0.000060134247,0.9440834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97257525,0.0018329272,0.0013340558,0.0022980536,0.0019224392,0.0000023706903,0.0000017417506,0.000012361563,0.020020831],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969182,0.00025699157,0.0006756513,0.00017671428,0.0016231331,0.0003492932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931282,0.000029296436,0.000941778,0.00013051274,0.005420638,0.00034961832],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014125761,0.000095584575,0.00023275058,0.00033923518,0.0014360705,0.011933794,0.0014969314,0.00008477503,0.0007602392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015001522,0.00007805818,0.0001720861,0.002345681,0.0004656273,0.096660584,0.00017597768,0.00076209026,0.000033246244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010022936,0.00021038752,0.06396251,0.000062841966,0.00004499231,0.00015187533,0.02631332,9.571957e-8,0.00037349222,0.13401455,0.7595891,0.015266821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023750709,0.000021752523,0.1967885,0.0004947411,0.00007106972,0.000095472395,0.0055734194,5.149916e-7,0.00007983023,0.006332449,0.7900949,0.00020983812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005877723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011171413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94627994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032487887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009749325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095093302","doi":"10.3138/jsp.32.1.43","title":"Personalities in Publishing: Ian Norrie","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Cultural History and Identity Formation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; League; Art history; Eleventh; League table; History; Art; Media studies; Sociology; Literature","score_opus":0.05000879306407001,"score_gpt":0.21651288428565452,"score_spread":0.1665040912215845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095093302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7551932,0.00086449884,0.0000020407842,0.0112097915,0.0010090204,0.00004853285,0.000012513189,0.000022238852,0.2316382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.964871,0.00004710274,0.00008891851,0.0012982318,0.0019851946,0.0000012833062,0.000014864742,0.000011740334,0.031681664],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815613,0.0001037221,0.0006667504,0.00010369668,0.00073794345,0.00023175152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984368,0.000040630373,0.00034970487,0.000105273204,0.00093326997,0.0001343155],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002129219,0.00011792442,0.00021395889,0.00046275093,0.00039886602,0.08016544,0.0006017934,0.000103159065,0.008025497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010862794,0.000098280856,0.0001618823,0.00013631104,0.000094428615,0.34622255,0.000029321898,0.0015033816,0.00006006406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016932041,0.00021039839,0.004065515,0.00008630697,0.00007942098,0.0000771629,0.3727472,0.000057651756,0.00009990027,0.17057611,0.3879232,0.063907795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058408803,0.000068778194,0.0041710194,0.00013753875,0.000015008407,0.00005710371,0.028363397,0.000017720255,0.0000058508176,0.0041408,0.9622973,0.00014139416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011476416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026211555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5743741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026955275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010671751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9928813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095560558","doi":"10.3138/jsp.34.2.108","title":"Single Authors Are Not Alone: Colleagues Often Help","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Keele University","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.5729729955135182,"score_gpt":0.500869914673737,"score_spread":0.07210308083978123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095560558","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9240908,0.004545751,0.0051311417,0.029708749,0.0046826056,0.00020103429,0.0000380114,0.000030147723,0.031571753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847288,0.00011628533,0.007567663,0.001331615,0.0004106975,0.0000012373473,7.388694e-7,0.00002209229,0.0058208415],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9739448,0.0010910251,0.0020554785,0.0005844382,0.021489464,0.00083482376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9586787,0.0062037697,0.0027282184,0.0008760568,0.02996301,0.0015502338],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1173359,0.00020942661,0.0006521287,0.06226433,0.00054564327,0.20049338,0.005164361,0.00036091974,0.0005175159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5364989,0.00014243805,0.00041245896,0.12866235,0.00012955848,0.09470325,0.0005412678,0.002531381,0.00011483615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009467921,0.00058933493,0.33653572,0.000007896298,0.00008820936,0.00035659852,0.00043661732,0.00008160389,0.008293746,0.0030372671,0.54458326,0.10589505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022831412,0.00071283086,0.16841069,0.00011446914,0.00003178444,0.0005701781,0.0057110433,0.00023292632,0.008797466,0.02724032,0.7853989,0.0004962738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000041741027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012722613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.419163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040692324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006918128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095587281","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44-4-003","title":"Science and Yiddish Don't Mix: <i>Really?</i>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Yiddish; Exposition (narrative); Surprise; Judaism; Drama; Subject (documents); Literature; History; Classics; Sociology; Art; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.008623213715499456,"score_gpt":0.22920173862708523,"score_spread":0.22057852491158578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095587281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6756522,0.0003914833,0.00032000255,0.0039468207,0.00028485197,0.00007638986,0.0000035632215,0.0000078054645,0.3193169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99784774,0.0000061157293,0.0010627235,0.00040091993,0.00052809814,0.0000024303365,5.2095726e-7,0.000008253747,0.00014320422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986057,0.000027373873,0.00029165982,0.0001418247,0.0006793292,0.00025410485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978027,0.0000772307,0.00022545553,0.000109600005,0.001529054,0.00025596895],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010874233,0.00010643471,0.00018306996,0.00015541329,0.00033945992,0.015144674,0.0004759276,0.000024677749,0.00015236318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024055295,0.0000784687,0.00006271965,0.00041939164,0.00038466696,0.05122979,0.0002877315,0.00064513856,0.0000104278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073910924,0.00013382592,0.025961734,0.000005796307,0.00006508128,0.0000018354576,0.00084230653,0.0000010532603,0.04270072,0.9053232,0.0087438105,0.01621323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076830795,0.00018128195,0.0112147005,0.00008700446,0.000027807238,0.000011737975,0.0039265053,0.00003194971,0.007748374,0.9710134,0.0047643105,0.00022460414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016440831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.8741638e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32219553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004108341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013723705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9858777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096088228","doi":"10.3138/jsp.41.1.67","title":"The International Publication Productivity of Malaysia in Social Sciences","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation index; Social Sciences Citation Index; Productivity; Index (typography); Impact factor; Science Citation Index; Social science; Citation; Citation analysis; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.5214194647309455,"score_gpt":0.5460663255256983,"score_spread":0.024646860794752867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096088228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8406416,0.000479463,0.0003936537,0.14191137,0.00072370924,0.000072263,0.0000031771096,0.0000030253157,0.015771704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979479,0.00005606337,0.0009801523,0.00024804403,0.00042743827,5.906447e-7,3.4944796e-7,0.000002165326,0.0003373161],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9842442,0.000335838,0.0012696312,0.00028278344,0.013544473,0.00032304003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97817135,0.0023269667,0.0016166286,0.00025682012,0.017505286,0.00012292672],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13778876,0.00007053366,0.00020706667,0.031811487,0.00043537642,0.09619536,0.006458803,0.00009301065,0.000044369222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28867754,0.000039749048,0.00013355487,0.0909909,0.00019812585,0.07792257,0.0003481242,0.0010361,0.0000045890447],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050114588,0.0002188708,0.49302253,9.612043e-7,0.000011936243,0.0000043661416,0.00029287845,0.000058015958,0.005026563,0.022883905,0.066265106,0.41216475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036401988,0.00016752456,0.9059202,0.000010956795,0.0000020845935,0.00002599815,0.00073152885,0.0008517893,0.0007141555,0.056810535,0.034336627,0.000064549175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017800146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000049574437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41289768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001838644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005975875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99891675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098485195","doi":"10.1353/scp.2004.0029","title":"\"Joy! Rapture! I've Got a Brain!\"","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rapture; Wizard; Order (exchange); Wizard of oz; Aesthetics; Sociology; Literature; Psychology; Visual arts; Art; History; Computer science; World Wide Web; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.04946522916121848,"score_gpt":0.2848902711316998,"score_spread":0.2354250419704813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098485195","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89455795,0.00013839928,0.0051490306,0.07056917,0.005881855,0.00015891306,0.000006396005,0.000068178044,0.02347012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685,0.000030688872,0.0005242371,0.028894046,0.0008218096,0.000002532557,5.2859815e-7,0.000018649842,0.0012074644],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973284,0.00021019424,0.0005290722,0.0003223614,0.0012753287,0.00033463852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975362,0.00032186334,0.0006439247,0.00019547196,0.0009603435,0.00034218733],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019049916,0.00014993276,0.0001875425,0.0006108499,0.00038824693,0.018411389,0.0008681238,0.000114373855,0.000100614314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029580161,0.0001265672,0.00015909832,0.0012808148,0.00011179987,0.071210794,0.00008452907,0.0017777488,0.000053792206],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010245378,0.00040832127,0.0013374115,0.0000111542395,0.000007928342,0.00015057146,0.0018334714,0.00011649942,0.94191194,0.021001555,0.020306168,0.01281252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006674917,0.001442817,0.043989133,0.00041224377,0.000068695444,0.004738734,0.0046648565,0.00003749765,0.4761692,0.05677195,0.40415412,0.00087584014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009278277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000022167849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46574277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019659619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006230073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9826076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099706944","doi":"10.3138/jsp.36.4.238","title":"How to Alienate Your Editor: A Practical Guide for Established Authors","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Writing and Publishing","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patience; Test (biology); Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.07119412031345913,"score_gpt":0.31403010577887885,"score_spread":0.24283598546541973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099706944","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04993149,0.00094245846,0.010548148,0.857183,0.0221598,0.0005399647,0.00012490123,0.00022270491,0.05834758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49959612,0.000047680125,0.11773718,0.018603254,0.30305618,0.000039895065,0.000033266642,0.00019738136,0.06068904],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962583,0.00017425386,0.0010760381,0.00033342355,0.001452736,0.00070522376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99284387,0.00078061724,0.0010391705,0.00026518037,0.004347769,0.0007234141],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010374136,0.0002663526,0.00046012382,0.0007553033,0.00071733486,0.14347406,0.0012314536,0.00033967773,0.00015048771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049984477,0.00022100445,0.00030354422,0.00019657757,0.00007751321,0.19415382,0.00019566876,0.003241754,0.000011931915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071078735,0.000060911327,0.00021726427,0.000022875356,0.00006288078,0.00000941309,0.011129663,0.000030809737,0.00022578053,0.04717719,0.9316379,0.0093542235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007824401,0.00018848956,0.000060193393,0.00017186586,0.00007679006,0.00011810541,0.016758334,0.00011439041,0.00006499975,0.0019256743,0.9794597,0.0002790401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008965728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010603693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8385797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028578195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045858303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101234645","doi":"10.3138/jsp.34.3.146","title":"‘Times Ain't Now Nothin' Like They Used To Be’","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Writing and Publishing","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Looming; Publishing; Time horizon; Horizon; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Law; Mathematics; Finance","score_opus":0.0651641802430409,"score_gpt":0.25726636531901464,"score_spread":0.19210218507597376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101234645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44753912,0.0016904825,0.00046931315,0.10936658,0.0062833377,0.00026430425,0.000047207766,0.00019126943,0.4341484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9628718,0.000027734062,0.0026937295,0.014590882,0.004498473,0.0000037711877,0.0000053118047,0.00007031943,0.015238018],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99633765,0.00033894222,0.0010106392,0.00028099518,0.0014426691,0.0005891075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957899,0.00051839976,0.0007596952,0.00030184977,0.0020912057,0.00053895416],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0085822465,0.00026988745,0.00045865544,0.000742174,0.0007450184,0.070784345,0.0013565148,0.0002678195,0.0012835581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010721356,0.00022098952,0.000259514,0.00019405251,0.00007398177,0.091130614,0.00012626348,0.0036249873,0.000055846824],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038345035,0.00010051289,0.003815471,0.000032657517,0.00012917785,0.00005824435,0.097692825,0.00007274526,0.0004997573,0.2345185,0.6609134,0.002128354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000613723,0.00013468658,0.00023689968,0.0001990103,0.00004625525,0.000101379126,0.01880612,0.000008422228,0.00010036848,0.006657821,0.972801,0.0002943052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001631621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029476942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51533264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001635864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034607202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101716213","doi":"10.1353/scp.2004.0009","title":"Business and Society and Business Ethics Journals: A Citation and Impact Analysis","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Ranking (information retrieval); Business ethics; Argument (complex analysis); Citation; Citation analysis; Sociology; Philosophy of business; Business management; Engineering ethics; Political science; Business model; Business; Public relations; Computer science; Library science; Law; Engineering; Marketing; Business administration","score_opus":0.27321684450540296,"score_gpt":0.446308274333392,"score_spread":0.17309142982798903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101716213","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8970167,0.005514509,0.040180244,0.05660735,0.00047803947,0.000051528288,0.0000059734643,0.0000075120765,0.0001381295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818585,0.0043459497,0.0123912785,0.0009104439,0.00044810996,7.7131205e-7,0.0000023327223,0.000012694956,0.00002995432],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952587,0.0003073415,0.0011509362,0.00034228704,0.0026910137,0.0002497294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761066,0.0031225013,0.0016364681,0.00026246725,0.018510021,0.00036196213],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03522678,0.00018633713,0.00051874964,0.0015255149,0.0007517857,0.0666363,0.0005274144,0.00045487995,0.000027919074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09859168,0.00012798843,0.00016349171,0.006486841,0.00024171128,0.07292329,0.00019288914,0.0026469964,6.950475e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001338055,0.00022678566,0.85002655,0.00016128733,0.00120585,0.00003654195,0.05156407,0.009519672,0.0022720594,0.00847116,0.0026983211,0.073683895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000634624,0.000029844961,0.8759437,0.00019234011,0.00025423578,0.0002687444,0.0065086493,0.00019809604,0.000007257611,0.115398146,0.00042391167,0.00014042357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040556386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012727418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.106926985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014785878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011818032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103899819","doi":"10.1353/scp.2005.0029","title":"Halted by the Archive: The Impact of Excessive Archival Restrictions on Scholars","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Digital and Traditional Archives Management","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Archivist; Narrative; Sociology; Archival science; Special collections; Library science; Order (exchange); Work (physics); Media studies; Law; Political science; History; Art; Computer science; Literature","score_opus":0.037016266389388555,"score_gpt":0.2556240789320115,"score_spread":0.21860781254262296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103899819","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5523661,0.00015801325,0.000120502955,0.02279451,0.0003199609,0.0001585341,0.00025985227,0.000015823414,0.4238067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959082,0.000045744233,0.00010161754,0.00071490486,0.0012786797,0.0000039495358,0.000018209597,0.00001404776,0.0019146397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981379,0.00017055399,0.0005353573,0.00011902884,0.0008137034,0.00022347357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802333,0.00060800434,0.0006456452,0.0002149518,0.0003877151,0.00012033743],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088390114,0.00014535795,0.0001774194,0.00028688172,0.0006907898,0.01514535,0.0010457594,0.0000142697545,0.00010073925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068463443,0.000068446316,0.00035196007,0.00012415335,0.0002971516,0.026035622,0.000112916336,0.0015544898,0.000014040479],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017937204,0.000546182,0.00038085744,0.000008971405,0.0005509754,0.000010647465,0.007037805,0.0015593659,0.0002510662,0.603398,0.30327103,0.08280572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012975201,0.001259504,0.1880547,0.0003033373,0.00013490756,0.00010617239,0.0034397296,0.00022462684,0.000073209245,0.16797276,0.63684845,0.00028511824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019951878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019061037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44354212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007190988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011526897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98758674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105621168","doi":"10.1353/scp.2004.0012","title":"Doing Scholarship on the Web: Ten Years of Triumphs - and a Disappointment","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disappointment; Scholarship; Shadow (psychology); Digital scholarship; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; World Wide Web; Computer science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.05152761039126223,"score_gpt":0.23380101100736045,"score_spread":0.1822734006160982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105621168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92872095,0.0008002635,0.0000060138286,0.0072076363,0.00049853604,0.00012473634,0.000023399658,0.000017469063,0.06260099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99682695,0.00006689927,0.00024754863,0.0013894363,0.00070660573,0.0000025912411,0.0000018351141,0.000026291875,0.0007318592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997762,0.0001131376,0.0006999088,0.0001605473,0.0009847005,0.00027970568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978564,0.00036615843,0.00063423224,0.00023842666,0.0007365439,0.00016827697],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034341,0.00017110867,0.00031109003,0.00035986287,0.00038024999,0.03369391,0.0007491559,0.00008533192,0.00021899996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019078415,0.00011528013,0.00020099164,0.00010127035,0.0002531629,0.043203935,0.00014349869,0.0016379268,0.000009079425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015096106,0.00023247245,0.0010789982,0.000041026582,0.0001752975,0.00006940108,0.023057202,0.00002433353,0.00032227763,0.9525899,0.001855108,0.020402996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0054293135,0.0023878135,0.02115457,0.0024377182,0.00021360093,0.00025105942,0.045047637,0.000003765975,0.00057499466,0.16016239,0.7616217,0.0007154441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000050105817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007248377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79242754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012806206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017358258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9701783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110116103","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.4.410","title":"Problems and Solutions for Social Science Journals at Chinese Universities","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Ideological and Political Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expediting; Internationalization; China; Political science; Social science; Sociology; Scholarly communication; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Business; Management; Engineering; Publishing; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.12093078461115989,"score_gpt":0.355398547871853,"score_spread":0.2344677632606931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110116103","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9277349,0.00063771976,0.0003180738,0.042758062,0.00051320024,0.00008229819,0.000004662169,0.000011524989,0.027939525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99552274,0.00014147932,0.0007308064,0.0005434501,0.0012654866,0.000001016276,4.9601846e-7,0.0000032844514,0.0017912172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833006,0.00011700637,0.00027294832,0.00009854707,0.00075916445,0.000422257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968644,0.00030216257,0.00028913195,0.000037567555,0.0021906237,0.00031615654],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005672652,0.000062154955,0.00014562129,0.0002847763,0.00521613,0.0051740534,0.00044132554,0.00011289841,0.000060904367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064906213,0.000047743757,0.00008459336,0.00056089816,0.0010520074,0.041780833,0.00011478794,0.0005023084,0.0000013204398],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009506527,0.00024548528,0.118027925,0.000039456878,0.000061338695,0.00001968608,0.16616313,0.000017446959,0.0038187543,0.67941,0.025062261,0.007039493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011965008,0.00024187576,0.6369322,0.0000858202,0.00005247814,0.00025921868,0.03800228,0.000033373508,0.000036791753,0.118555725,0.20429745,0.00030627442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023491618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000052104595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56085426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000485864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011540494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99607897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112210161","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0061","title":"Characterizing the Top Journals in Strategic Management: Orientation, Style, Originality, and Readability","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Management and Marketing Education","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Readability; Audience measurement; Style (visual arts); Publishing; Management styles; Strategic management; Orientation (vector space); Sociology; Management; Library science; Political science; Public relations; Business; Computer science; Marketing; Social science; Advertising; Art; Qualitative research; Literature; Economics","score_opus":0.035705413218408595,"score_gpt":0.27817606028970776,"score_spread":0.24247064707129917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112210161","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9228743,0.00031876928,0.00007261578,0.03713157,0.00060480525,0.00020607443,4.1087145e-7,0.00002090638,0.038770586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99390936,0.00010595338,0.00047376298,0.0039684493,0.0013437938,0.0000022410736,0.000005433748,0.000009906641,0.00018108546],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794054,0.00008384781,0.00076158333,0.00020677874,0.00073586166,0.00027136639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978372,0.0000920917,0.0010348214,0.00022053842,0.00078406156,0.000031279447],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010746035,0.00015227501,0.00021657068,0.0007867979,0.000274548,0.03317255,0.0006143516,0.000072473325,0.000096639546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000900759,0.000111504916,0.00006733348,0.0010435246,0.000030888317,0.0653647,0.00012719867,0.0008743712,0.0000040290256],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027598967,0.0003991649,0.67664385,0.00036790702,0.0001138144,0.00007023975,0.00081104954,0.000016867627,0.0005319323,0.22970338,0.008215595,0.082850195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059031654,0.00001669764,0.898662,0.00024318806,0.00007746093,0.000011116259,0.003987773,0.00007474591,0.0000039341444,0.067015454,0.02915933,0.00015799276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008545984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018306679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22201812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000881319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003353913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96783113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112455984","doi":"10.3138/jsp.35.2.118","title":"The Transom: ‘De Libris Incognitis’","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.03897716175432919,"score_gpt":0.2340204860962992,"score_spread":0.19504332434197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112455984","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61332124,0.008923032,0.0009929213,0.19190954,0.002767026,0.00017066958,0.000021276996,0.00013491421,0.18175937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935304,0.0003807822,0.0011524291,0.0016057568,0.0019141593,0.000003444134,0.000004618551,0.000027642247,0.0013807642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763966,0.00029030177,0.000724828,0.00011707092,0.0008658445,0.00036232502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963175,0.00041181978,0.0006209778,0.00037632263,0.002045557,0.00022780948],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072070654,0.0001414634,0.00020135715,0.00027752735,0.0016061426,0.17064416,0.0021984472,0.00012869279,0.00008087497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005611223,0.00009631163,0.00021280287,0.0001600652,0.000192499,0.15622678,0.000112460024,0.003159501,0.000016170625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014189037,0.00027673243,0.0020919142,0.000024374156,0.00028591134,0.000074521005,0.08993961,0.00011237916,0.0007958985,0.74981487,0.06454994,0.09189198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012396311,0.00016472637,0.0026278018,0.0001880919,0.0000530859,0.0001659531,0.009885538,0.000008909052,0.00013243672,0.102847375,0.88250464,0.00018182695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004085967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003733739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81795466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024958397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005414372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116092012","doi":"10.3138/jsp.34.3.129","title":"AAP/PSP Annual Conference 2003: Keynote Address","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Literature Analysis and Criticism","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; History; Media studies; Management; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.026848969128115928,"score_gpt":0.28041684919373233,"score_spread":0.2535678800656164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116092012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8244776,0.013882312,0.003996037,0.021464376,0.00231478,0.00028566524,0.00004350518,0.000057871915,0.13347782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860461,0.00010393642,0.0045474106,0.004435091,0.0008089079,0.0000012399147,0.000008270525,0.000022715969,0.0040263557],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972071,0.00020226486,0.00080499233,0.00020628191,0.001223885,0.00035548612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894718,0.00007698049,0.0004662684,0.00030039984,0.009176726,0.0005078052],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030999265,0.00018040513,0.0005426409,0.0004694393,0.00013510372,0.013281997,0.00038746124,0.00026502,0.0005374721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0119573735,0.00013494061,0.0002311936,0.00091791025,0.00005036071,0.041539546,0.000042216278,0.0025155144,0.000014390219],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007500259,0.0015098882,0.097991854,0.000319545,0.0021331087,0.004482048,0.019954128,0.000028922852,0.029755995,0.09785204,0.7176318,0.027590616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006743375,0.0010591683,0.038797293,0.0015011947,0.0012495426,0.004547633,0.011569493,0.00006664441,0.0052697016,0.004396616,0.92418236,0.00061699405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009249215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020910363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20655051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009833203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006388081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118089643","doi":"10.3138/jsp.34.2.101","title":"Improving the International Influence of Chinese Academic Journals","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internationalization; China; Publishing; Quality (philosophy); Political science; Business; Public relations; International trade; Law","score_opus":0.39091432082969024,"score_gpt":0.5287340650515185,"score_spread":0.1378197442218283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118089643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98111826,0.003403675,0.002539799,0.008312625,0.0013362654,0.00006945296,0.0000065102863,0.0000035407902,0.0032098445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965154,0.0004029145,0.0018317992,0.0005967785,0.00032036926,7.060349e-7,1.4197263e-7,0.0000086536875,0.00032321666],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9764895,0.0005942877,0.0023292846,0.00029534966,0.019855369,0.00043624948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9557746,0.0077233207,0.0038774787,0.00060954894,0.03147076,0.0005443004],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.15194057,0.00013150767,0.0003575967,0.034237824,0.0002837599,0.07086129,0.009372518,0.00020923415,0.0002946454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6464418,0.00006567073,0.00029080483,0.0721408,0.00013494387,0.0962071,0.0007207411,0.0037585862,0.0000143931875],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021639915,0.00004548981,0.9206646,0.0000025266231,0.000038280727,0.000016705317,0.00035216802,0.00063250767,0.0341491,0.0012173817,0.0059144646,0.036945153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000929951,0.00013871762,0.9130769,0.00006832028,0.000011702865,0.0005477015,0.0013390636,0.0006491431,0.00224727,0.048021566,0.03281012,0.0001595653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004042144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000025955942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49450126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017148521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080822536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119813408","doi":"10.3138/jsp.47.1.04","title":"Spanish Scholarly Journals in WoS and Scopus: The Impact of Open Access","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Psychology Research and Bibliometrics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Directory; Publishing; Scholarly communication; Library science; Permission; Impact factor; Web of science; Political science; Business; World Wide Web; Computer science; MEDLINE; Law","score_opus":0.4362149947158016,"score_gpt":0.5570998931937182,"score_spread":0.12088489847791661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119813408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95557004,0.015139813,0.0001316552,0.009914055,0.0008494452,0.000340521,0.000018279685,0.000007217458,0.018028952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974575,0.0005503204,0.00045680586,0.0007213431,0.00047744808,0.000006608104,0.0000016213962,0.00003055048,0.00029780247],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945028,0.0014451165,0.0014028642,0.00032936258,0.0015928665,0.0007269788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916896,0.00081758306,0.0015857794,0.0005870187,0.004407097,0.0009128867],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.034768563,0.00023366704,0.00069102354,0.0088479305,0.00016402459,0.11884701,0.007619573,0.00041227104,0.00043433547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026047552,0.00014330052,0.00021283946,0.012407227,0.00021591151,0.21551156,0.001679185,0.0055641015,0.000012881823],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007979657,0.000389478,0.81995535,0.000007561486,0.00031861724,0.00026661553,0.0019122078,0.000008983739,0.0008135945,0.00023850438,0.1535839,0.021707222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049197404,0.001041523,0.9780433,0.00024126683,0.0000291376,0.0014164202,0.0023351782,0.000009379122,0.00004625034,0.008694247,0.0030490702,0.00017444708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020426044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000050078488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15808798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002824154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011452407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121268485","doi":"10.1353/scp.2006.0012","title":"A System Destabilized: Scholarly Books Today","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Principal (computer security); Character (mathematics); Scholarly communication; Sociology; Social science; Political science; Media studies; Publishing; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.03789630717143656,"score_gpt":0.22707425362341702,"score_spread":0.18917794645198044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121268485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5636141,0.006424928,0.0005667778,0.012338984,0.0032571147,0.00025500238,0.000036851976,0.00032381172,0.41318244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883207,0.000021658117,0.0024870036,0.00054366287,0.003498903,0.000008251628,0.00002190192,0.000060838218,0.005037054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99493796,0.0006830955,0.0016783224,0.00030673618,0.0018419063,0.0005519812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906786,0.0004196327,0.0016140378,0.00079883926,0.0061755297,0.00031333254],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010409237,0.00031832862,0.00055939914,0.0010539207,0.0012565036,0.28386864,0.0027927074,0.00029082023,0.00020548141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004654395,0.00026851715,0.00038906353,0.000280462,0.00018119597,0.34537014,0.00029199716,0.0045040837,0.00004485746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011190961,0.00028510828,0.009675104,0.00010140501,0.00014122849,0.000090013324,0.007945316,0.000042241154,0.0019487222,0.87422067,0.09894183,0.0064964714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020096865,0.00026070053,0.0068548312,0.0006781923,0.00014992087,0.0003485934,0.013347137,0.00009287874,0.00018278405,0.013450932,0.96207345,0.00055091805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014822696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044042044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8631316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000635341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046684235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124205056","doi":"10.1353/scp.2007.0003","title":"The Decline and Fall of Bottom Notes, op. cit., loc. cit., and a Century of the Chicago Manual of Style","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Style (visual arts); Taste; Citation; Scholarship; History; Function (biology); Writing style; Literature; Law; Art; Political science; Psychology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.013999822165426844,"score_gpt":0.2514144916410389,"score_spread":0.23741466947561207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124205056","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96376044,0.016499992,0.000022118651,0.0149533115,0.00035651066,0.00008650837,0.00001807551,0.0000037888326,0.0042992765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99732935,0.0011463638,0.000557088,0.00017281105,0.00036685076,5.0198827e-7,3.8354955e-7,0.000005425807,0.00042123804],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780184,0.00028090854,0.0006798244,0.0001041865,0.0009382904,0.00019497442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99739623,0.00071824697,0.00087620376,0.00012391832,0.0007917601,0.00009362849],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034791,0.00009027702,0.00029392584,0.00009367759,0.00053391466,0.0012697461,0.0005854578,0.000108385735,0.0000062506765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003493985,0.00005016574,0.00011194229,0.00039853857,0.00049356295,0.006780603,0.00022680328,0.0007183496,7.684262e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027422418,0.00040998933,0.81573576,0.00013736195,0.00026608177,0.00001310696,0.048587956,0.000010633353,0.00371493,0.061276693,0.023006424,0.046566837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000748332,0.00015208288,0.42045116,0.00018734849,0.000067730805,0.000008996693,0.005280012,0.0000074409368,0.00011017077,0.005850869,0.56702447,0.00011137841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003230701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011401874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5440181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050268616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014388945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128959152","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0000","title":"Surviving Referees' Reports","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Indigenous; Politics; The Renaissance; Media studies; Sociology; Slavic languages; Social science; History; Library science; Classics; Political science; Art history; Law","score_opus":0.7110167972722886,"score_gpt":0.5385857244027762,"score_spread":0.17243107286951243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128959152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95689857,0.0021829053,0.0036690256,0.005782422,0.00241932,0.000066633904,0.0000029831301,0.00001541049,0.028962744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908741,0.0002657155,0.004799633,0.0003565873,0.00061269227,5.628183e-7,6.1052265e-7,0.000013942256,0.003076129],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9705828,0.000544184,0.0023883672,0.00048925524,0.025370928,0.0006244926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9541607,0.0053340513,0.0027044448,0.001027959,0.03563078,0.0011420698],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13417986,0.0001435547,0.0004851302,0.06344842,0.00058366597,0.1104982,0.0041430164,0.00023564123,0.0004735006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5040732,0.000094874726,0.0003344159,0.11541018,0.00011284376,0.14278956,0.00090428843,0.002457187,0.00005092217],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016635839,0.00009299045,0.79164606,0.0000017645867,0.000024379255,0.0016642069,0.00026462908,0.000034981273,0.0012259788,0.00029414977,0.16133177,0.04340243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004540179,0.00019956152,0.7392214,0.000032245,0.0000069183366,0.006383168,0.00065533275,0.00012684727,0.0004459396,0.012265584,0.24001183,0.00019717876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000095797106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009043299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36989334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002377719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090532727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129572150","doi":"10.3138/jsp.35.4.223","title":"‘All Would of Been Caos’","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Historical Linguistics and Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Redaction; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.05068065813670382,"score_gpt":0.253026884917789,"score_spread":0.20234622678108521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129572150","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25807902,0.011682021,0.00048014996,0.016900398,0.0060811387,0.00013441034,0.00006757631,0.000048255468,0.70652705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937771,0.00005005694,0.001203713,0.00086480536,0.0026658203,4.824438e-7,0.0000017481241,0.000014445953,0.0014218258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857336,0.000025009842,0.0005618298,0.000083500716,0.00058123836,0.00017503642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973208,0.00006728617,0.00052026735,0.00011108305,0.0018624088,0.000118196855],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096895476,0.00009737014,0.00027721038,0.00023427379,0.00019596849,0.0046112877,0.00041152007,0.00009718224,0.00024461292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003865363,0.000073315205,0.00015429058,0.00006471227,0.00009854642,0.008989823,0.0000679904,0.0013203981,0.0000051878865],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005229125,0.00025323193,0.00093675574,0.00007380832,0.0003334132,0.00019072648,0.10846319,0.000056202487,0.00047534468,0.85331863,0.030786507,0.0050599026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064872444,0.00018742829,0.0006977946,0.000120477256,0.00007102277,0.000014419999,0.0055537797,7.983431e-7,0.000079454316,0.011141258,0.98136526,0.00011956311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00073188887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017616815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95057875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013328041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010404508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131067941","doi":"10.3138/jsp.34.4.221","title":"Bridging Matriarchal Order and Patriarchal Culture in a State Institution: The Evolving <i>Femspec</i> Kitchen on the Eighteenth Floor","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Historical Gender and Feminism Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bridging (networking); Institution; Sociology; Order (exchange); State (computer science); Gender studies; Genealogy; History; Social science; Economics; Mathematics; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.0386976256542741,"score_gpt":0.27622968791803143,"score_spread":0.23753206226375734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131067941","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44575703,0.04371915,0.0043975953,0.12860511,0.0051383227,0.0011857862,0.000020745378,0.00008304606,0.3710932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957412,0.0016410917,0.0005133425,0.0009440606,0.0007454923,0.000004108537,2.2605931e-7,0.000009298883,0.00040117695],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693865,0.00082554034,0.00048574273,0.0001815355,0.0011702598,0.00039827684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982918,0.0004032144,0.00031404593,0.00013947261,0.00068245153,0.00016901025],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009360846,0.0001408607,0.00023421577,0.00016766731,0.0016478553,0.0067141526,0.00059752516,0.00011122655,0.000033843862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011565335,0.000076106146,0.00009624404,0.0009074041,0.00028027344,0.01088428,0.00009598958,0.0020976495,0.0000035865526],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015109303,0.00019749843,0.040737767,0.000029140943,0.00020990928,0.00019262599,0.77445126,0.00009973927,0.00020382386,0.11212362,0.042778146,0.028825369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002972471,0.00028797647,0.027221091,0.0004182317,0.0001102227,0.00012026752,0.2762997,0.00007707042,0.000064819535,0.027970748,0.66386175,0.0005956883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051101553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022131477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6210836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034132006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004717326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131232664","doi":"10.3138/c972-1321-8720-314m","title":"Exploring the Willingness of Scholars to Accept Open Access: A Grounded Theory Approach","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Big Data and Business Intelligence","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Grounded theory; Generalizability theory; Publication; Relevance (law); Reputation; Psychology; Quality (philosophy); Citation; Qualitative research; Social psychology; Sociology; Public relations; Computer science; Social science; World Wide Web; Epistemology; Political science; Advertising; Business","score_opus":0.3690583281456378,"score_gpt":0.3717323274184517,"score_spread":0.002673999272813865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131232664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8514923,0.00045502128,0.09857599,0.0051725945,0.0025197465,0.00056216546,0.000004580344,0.00004482061,0.04117281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898298,0.00004033595,0.0034005928,0.0036909794,0.002863266,0.000011138071,0.000007677266,0.00004498086,0.00011124611],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99646497,0.00006679242,0.0012214078,0.00033763913,0.0014007618,0.0005084154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942514,0.00033445982,0.0015138598,0.0006075877,0.0032171034,0.00007560525],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02139074,0.00025929845,0.0004650325,0.00097531156,0.0005078309,0.11239432,0.009862287,0.00012411611,0.00012527424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00910794,0.00017380716,0.00017206135,0.0032554527,0.00009680344,0.43188718,0.0037751396,0.0017412269,0.00001700878],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019538994,0.00086830446,0.08875891,0.0006053443,0.00047586975,0.00008761627,0.001932015,0.00089097756,0.004927899,0.2670682,0.020629486,0.6118015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022898796,0.00009544419,0.528403,0.0017668308,0.0004562223,0.00016054115,0.019683782,0.0002002651,0.0033933767,0.058428254,0.38383725,0.0012851417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059871987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000051503204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6105163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000097214644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013128082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131418799","doi":"10.3138/jsp.34.4.214","title":"My Favourite Plagiarist: Some Reflections of an Offended Party","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Favourite; Work (physics); Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.09458274108467288,"score_gpt":0.3993961375232506,"score_spread":0.30481339643857774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131418799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53825593,0.0005850748,0.0007925862,0.12133927,0.0049742847,0.00019020063,0.000013027932,0.000052971438,0.33379665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863486,0.00007217126,0.009638756,0.0013875528,0.0008351848,0.0000018656242,0.0000029302737,0.000010910024,0.0017019884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717635,0.00082748797,0.00067612564,0.000117499345,0.00097211445,0.00023041644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951737,0.00036428965,0.0010397844,0.0001813208,0.0029651925,0.00027574762],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009596422,0.0000805095,0.00017986645,0.000497604,0.00076117704,0.012884414,0.0005085895,0.00020946801,0.00041073348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030081771,0.00007635709,0.000095704534,0.0012904882,0.00011065828,0.15178739,0.000016852593,0.0022846567,0.0000065199365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003618843,0.00061413227,0.005970955,0.00001160436,0.00010041075,0.000010104711,0.03527699,0.000038704187,0.0036681402,0.91402006,0.035376314,0.004876391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000412074,0.000087020286,0.004266528,0.000030763138,0.000037715923,0.000035168934,0.02546595,0.0000029822486,0.0005616234,0.028409675,0.9405771,0.00011340771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011029306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004818905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9052008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019450675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025733006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9925824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131524565","doi":"10.3138/jsp.33.1.47","title":"Personalities in Publishing: John Taylor","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Cultural History and Identity Formation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Art history; Management; Sociology; History; Classics; Art; Economics; Literature","score_opus":0.06956090973819821,"score_gpt":0.23437718226224008,"score_spread":0.16481627252404185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131524565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8145877,0.0015487596,0.000033002976,0.015549453,0.0023712656,0.000069389454,0.000009561897,0.000031188367,0.16579966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838813,0.00007276899,0.00014259372,0.0012001677,0.0023225544,0.0000016180766,0.000012474309,0.000012515299,0.012353991],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980097,0.000104019,0.00070922193,0.00010706071,0.0008200662,0.00024994693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976261,0.00006605121,0.0005624185,0.00010686598,0.0015045499,0.000133999],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026681507,0.000123526,0.00023598569,0.000696496,0.0003879376,0.08239239,0.00062597595,0.000107640655,0.001587742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024583552,0.00010156065,0.00016932297,0.00017945754,0.00009013825,0.3604453,0.000062131265,0.0015580483,0.000028277147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022766025,0.00028606062,0.01907351,0.00009560129,0.000109732115,0.00022998455,0.2678071,0.000038241764,0.00028781197,0.29765686,0.38555878,0.028628672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006653018,0.00007527349,0.003996931,0.00011435272,0.000016858321,0.00014849564,0.041461628,0.00004303387,0.00000777795,0.004824096,0.9484972,0.00014905898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080195937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021670838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5629384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032809365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000082771665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132912170","doi":"10.1353/scp.2005.0009","title":"A Tale of Two Journals: Comment","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Status quo; Value (mathematics); Reading (process); Product (mathematics); Circulation (fluid dynamics); Field (mathematics); Public relations; Apathy; Morality; Resistance (ecology); Marketing; Business; Psychology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Biology; Ecology; Engineering","score_opus":0.07814171609244194,"score_gpt":0.29716618624386787,"score_spread":0.21902447015142593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132912170","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62093735,0.014555391,0.0007080642,0.18802251,0.0020491453,0.00018073109,0.000040213472,0.000069316586,0.17343728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989314,0.00017124727,0.0042287307,0.0027773518,0.0024481905,0.0000015929317,0.000005228958,0.000023813865,0.0010298205],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965849,0.00036316883,0.0013751212,0.00012308428,0.0012718994,0.00028182002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932934,0.00029731094,0.0018381567,0.00044070595,0.0038898184,0.00024057436],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008869065,0.00016071108,0.00040144907,0.00077412004,0.00045298281,0.05770826,0.0019632247,0.00010019003,0.0008368459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035703399,0.00013206014,0.00027409205,0.00018130099,0.0001300579,0.18271874,0.00022447342,0.0027104113,0.000013170841],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000151985,0.0011641487,0.011409186,0.00005996558,0.0005274883,0.0000243314,0.071658716,0.0003602928,0.004168377,0.3191723,0.44600737,0.14529584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015590073,0.00017602887,0.0013516174,0.0003480211,0.000069977454,0.00009927352,0.005286552,0.00011907318,0.00036142324,0.006446612,0.98399585,0.00018657018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019511684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017047844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5379885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019869511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021868243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133323014","doi":"10.1353/scp.2004.0014","title":"Diary of a Dissertation Writer: Journals as a Map to a Discipline","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Publishing; Field (mathematics); Value (mathematics); Key (lock); Sociology; Epistemology; Social science; Computer science; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.021348958073144613,"score_gpt":0.31630804368177395,"score_spread":0.2949590856086293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133323014","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91593856,0.0018730725,0.0007820817,0.07121566,0.0010694709,0.000117953954,0.000010395962,0.000011710454,0.008981105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99453956,0.0001481541,0.0020627151,0.0006778046,0.00091694866,0.0000014518225,0.0000012218638,0.00001219838,0.001639972],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976711,0.00015922078,0.00061502575,0.00010391945,0.0012109469,0.00023974797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972212,0.000099945784,0.00062229263,0.00011387463,0.001361612,0.0005810867],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050990502,0.00007013216,0.00022416966,0.001509307,0.0006686049,0.022952557,0.0006966247,0.00012614357,0.00024525987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007393429,0.000077034376,0.00017219066,0.00080078124,0.00010882164,0.04515676,0.000045196593,0.00080018566,0.000021591948],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005831873,0.0010217373,0.035434213,0.00019727953,0.00042996384,0.00085265766,0.5815113,0.0011159725,0.031211123,0.15526967,0.08094261,0.111430295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002198083,0.0004914453,0.12946992,0.0018773846,0.00014882468,0.00011851431,0.05698449,0.0000021148185,0.00026578442,0.06898898,0.7389681,0.0004863805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06935074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20372659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6580255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009947106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020045873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97806174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133766410","doi":"10.3138/jsp.34.4.208","title":"In Others' Words","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Technology in Education and Healthcare","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Acknowledgement; Pleasure; Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Aesthetics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.046460245475192535,"score_gpt":0.368277753599385,"score_spread":0.3218175081241925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133766410","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66307193,0.0013988023,0.000095318515,0.22962296,0.0023922084,0.0000709493,4.801172e-7,0.000024041334,0.10332329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99245834,0.00015154785,0.0026983425,0.0028835118,0.0003315497,0.0000010577461,7.4710265e-8,0.0000057016478,0.0014698653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856097,0.00032711096,0.00033956574,0.00007331911,0.00047170187,0.00022735982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878937,0.00011112673,0.00027258697,0.000091708614,0.0005854351,0.0001497557],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066716415,0.000044911125,0.00011616832,0.0004860584,0.00021386328,0.0044162166,0.00047731635,0.0002445646,0.00041187703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012645087,0.000042834192,0.00004418062,0.0007425396,0.00007456226,0.03519374,0.000011113049,0.0014846148,0.000008581866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008454849,0.00012110395,0.31810802,0.0000068025442,0.000012694147,0.000031690754,0.055286497,0.000002467847,0.00013316562,0.5816665,0.033240695,0.011381863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003026242,0.000023775538,0.015711473,0.000044697037,0.0000028773813,0.000016702768,0.077348664,1.7022536e-7,0.000047406083,0.03702136,0.8694186,0.00006165576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005698134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010745601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8361779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031624173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010155194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966173},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2139104607","doi":"10.1353/scp.2005.0006","title":"The Promise of Enemies","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Publishing; Blasphemy; Active listening; Quality (philosophy); Noun; Sociology; Media studies; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0418873230769127,"score_gpt":0.23854130605255566,"score_spread":0.19665398297564296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139104607","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68082345,0.014666066,0.00007308166,0.09828574,0.0015763935,0.00015566958,0.0000132930445,0.00005233765,0.20435399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925573,0.00030639212,0.0011290885,0.0003738217,0.0017333429,0.0000021896271,0.0000021563214,0.000015261225,0.0038804621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772555,0.00024886918,0.0008772591,0.00008561893,0.0008497317,0.00021299806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99472624,0.0005206311,0.0011367227,0.0004172116,0.0030853658,0.00011384288],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073512024,0.0001081423,0.00021436458,0.00025477997,0.00078967755,0.06526087,0.0019808908,0.00008450504,0.000106128806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007074132,0.000067556895,0.0001728346,0.00011110972,0.00019321693,0.13389896,0.00016455639,0.0017686496,0.000006582916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014673208,0.00025804213,0.0036524471,0.000032125794,0.00024959169,0.000004225936,0.052612048,0.000058097005,0.0018690582,0.54931086,0.19305706,0.19874969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000436749,0.00008521145,0.001504635,0.00009866556,0.000030223842,0.000022264652,0.0054880595,0.000036736667,0.000334725,0.005200431,0.98667026,0.00009206655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007482465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022229164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7936132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009657116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021701398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9357095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141275412","doi":"10.3138/jsp.40.4.343","title":"Motivations for Web-Based Scholarly Publishing: Do Scientists Recognize Open Availability as an Advantage?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Perception; Control (management); Public relations; Open data; Scholarly communication; Psychology; Sociology; World Wide Web; Social psychology; Internet privacy; Business; Advertising; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Management; Law","score_opus":0.48923711479207593,"score_gpt":0.5404845672119195,"score_spread":0.051247452419843575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141275412","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9031478,0.0008432237,0.011257841,0.05635061,0.0027467313,0.0012268085,0.00021950314,0.00006039547,0.024147091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9410326,0.00004407036,0.053104833,0.0033855084,0.00066492177,0.00001397742,0.000028940018,0.000035115085,0.0016900473],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9697313,0.0014735789,0.0034139366,0.0016570351,0.022308877,0.0014153286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8700938,0.011779959,0.004140586,0.0026766113,0.107819885,0.0034891136],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24006544,0.00038823235,0.00092715997,0.06397784,0.0018143994,0.7975296,0.022871837,0.00061908783,0.0008636441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.731846,0.0002925379,0.0005819236,0.13397464,0.00022777758,0.6333806,0.0014946999,0.0042716553,0.00007658113],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000507036,0.0017334599,0.33707026,0.0000143736,0.00005683543,0.000054849035,0.00036570887,0.0000817928,0.008262666,0.0077905273,0.20937258,0.4346899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0066955914,0.0022925637,0.51166034,0.00014893725,0.00004520527,0.00013505995,0.002146121,0.0022565026,0.0010627592,0.17529158,0.29759875,0.00066659687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000104976316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030312673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49178052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086017884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047434024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154299690","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.1.78","title":"Shelley B. Wepner and Linda B. Gambrell, eds. <i>Beating the Odds: Getting Published in the Field of Literacy.</i> Newark, DE: International Reading Association, 2006. Pp. xvi, 192. Paper: ISBN-13 978-0-87207-589-4, US$25.95.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Odds; Association (psychology); Literacy; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Library science; Media studies; Computer science; Philosophy; Linguistics; Epistemology; Mathematics; Pedagogy; Statistics; Logistic regression; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.009243915360183886,"score_gpt":0.2823910573729704,"score_spread":0.2731471420127865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154299690","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6899575,0.0034391307,0.00075226696,0.220303,0.0023329046,0.00036361508,0.000014825921,0.000038963044,0.082797796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94508624,0.0011980784,0.0028820408,0.04665022,0.002869233,0.0000041017697,0.000010281155,0.000017241846,0.0012825563],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99462163,0.0005978422,0.0016755271,0.00021889413,0.0022563448,0.00062977785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99155307,0.0039942856,0.0021822036,0.00024789225,0.0018046595,0.0002178733],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.035350785,0.00017997106,0.00029061138,0.00042490824,0.0009316833,0.032813463,0.0020764517,0.0002883394,0.00023144443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032990597,0.00011997468,0.00016736878,0.0015499155,0.00011719179,0.24279232,0.00020394394,0.0022042284,0.0000034874292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047245063,0.00008845593,0.68110025,0.000024634975,0.00007030671,0.000016940714,0.10269672,0.00008712172,0.00044754473,0.009806872,0.16431777,0.04129614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083372515,0.00007527985,0.15637162,0.00039532536,0.000025550578,0.000041114763,0.026285827,0.0004156283,0.0001697622,0.0026933323,0.812452,0.00024082142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001964477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014838502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64813423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027387735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005799314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154781321","doi":"10.3138/jsp.47.1.01","title":"Academic Libraries and the Economics of Scholarly Publishing in the Twenty-First Century: Portfolio Theory, Product Differentiation, Economic Rent, Perfect Price Discrimination, and the Cost of Prestige","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Portfolio; Prestige; Economics; Product (mathematics); Product differentiation; Sociology; Financial economics; Political science; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.04806720215392401,"score_gpt":0.24004356695401555,"score_spread":0.19197636480009153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154781321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8760166,0.020792592,0.00007149501,0.089350216,0.0009782524,0.0008133428,0.000052233117,0.00001967956,0.011905599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995139,0.003186284,0.0001135257,0.00055849063,0.00075093453,0.000024728693,0.00003156805,0.000028483662,0.00016699843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945819,0.0023140716,0.0017158936,0.0003007514,0.00076405273,0.000323378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99157876,0.0027176007,0.0029344312,0.00076099206,0.0018450826,0.00016314592],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.034970883,0.00026726024,0.0006077546,0.0006028882,0.00082694803,0.11133311,0.0031028057,0.00018952576,0.000023397331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027109455,0.00014238633,0.00016084849,0.00022525508,0.0012121907,0.23647639,0.0006445365,0.0039336565,5.3423037e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005998863,0.00007568423,0.038132597,0.000057241803,0.00015174791,6.3296125e-7,0.10570932,0.00007404922,0.000008325957,0.8444643,0.007603073,0.0031231313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01844869,0.0003444103,0.22343785,0.0010194752,0.00076254236,0.00019267813,0.13769077,0.0013295852,0.000075631964,0.4442593,0.17171012,0.0007289799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008539426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043767822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40020505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000168548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051552936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155789373","doi":"10.3138/jsp.47.1.br2","title":"Crafting Scholarship in the Behavioral and Social Sciences: Writing, Reviewing, and Editing","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Behavioural sciences; Sociology; Social science; Political science","score_opus":0.20062296759411527,"score_gpt":0.35865244849933564,"score_spread":0.15802948090522037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155789373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9477864,0.013467666,0.000006037801,0.012001339,0.000321328,0.000069174566,0.0000031379773,0.000010633222,0.02633427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951126,0.000071101225,0.0005509153,0.0014082143,0.002776902,0.0000021001451,8.816326e-7,0.00001004776,0.00006721424],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976379,0.0003406782,0.0006247385,0.00016667695,0.00095244223,0.0002775396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982753,0.00017886437,0.00057582575,0.00007871916,0.0008266391,0.000064665874],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.016883569,0.00013231505,0.00030747033,0.00035652088,0.0009888648,0.04340457,0.00055986387,0.00005502527,0.00002618437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003766674,0.00008670231,0.0000774469,0.00017173412,0.00047951614,0.046347074,0.00019531176,0.0013869683,8.354037e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015175502,0.0001535593,0.2951145,0.00010641915,0.00010793961,0.00020014685,0.52715296,0.0000038345997,0.000039375012,0.10969891,0.0146146035,0.052792586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011560741,0.0002805138,0.014578484,0.00097572524,0.0003026307,0.00022478083,0.88282806,0.000021834314,0.00000455215,0.007843723,0.09144814,0.00033550215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014792896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035945917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35567507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051399154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008523814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9669912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163204170","doi":"10.3138/jsp.35.3.177","title":"No Spectacle in the Stacks","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"American Sports and Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Spectacle; Reading (process); Greatness; Visual arts; Institution; Class (philosophy); Media studies; CONTEST; Law; Sociology; Art history; Art; Computer science; Political science; Literature","score_opus":0.020799389097216257,"score_gpt":0.22207521215744935,"score_spread":0.2012758230602331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163204170","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39697573,0.001271797,0.000032277032,0.0209199,0.0013515285,0.00009104308,0.000010646065,0.000014671383,0.5793324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872854,0.000021377826,0.00035036946,0.004870814,0.0031791956,7.8605757e-7,0.0000021961341,0.000011547926,0.0042783287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987141,0.000048242317,0.0003995044,0.00008363524,0.00056879997,0.00018570606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872696,0.000044247125,0.00034676708,0.00014073394,0.0006769693,0.00006433493],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016551878,0.00009064795,0.0001642384,0.00020285643,0.0001875758,0.03178,0.00061214727,0.000047745078,0.0012785133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004777965,0.00005153419,0.000101624544,0.000114437906,0.00008549707,0.042180255,0.00002977836,0.0016683633,0.000014784895],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007691116,0.0002891645,0.0049467497,0.000017744955,0.000049175476,0.00063995476,0.19848275,0.000066873596,0.00009932912,0.6668223,0.12459432,0.003914694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048926665,0.00013114316,0.0047090207,0.000088852976,0.000009275836,0.00007268326,0.020637956,6.590232e-7,0.000002784364,0.003024126,0.97075266,0.000081584054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027995312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001451396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8461583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007627313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001309307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166004515","doi":"10.3138/jsp.47.1.03","title":"Use of Social Networking Sites among Chinese and American Researchers: A Comparative Study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Impact of Technology on Adolescents","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Focus (optics); Sociology; Public relations; Psychology; Advertising; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.2561154188966886,"score_gpt":0.42626904263748094,"score_spread":0.17015362374079235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166004515","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.994676,0.00019897662,0.000022705506,0.00367714,0.00019659085,0.00018950964,0.0000018720723,0.000026433621,0.0010107995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983088,0.00001710462,0.00089539756,0.00008754325,0.0005752394,9.4685447e-7,4.4389864e-7,0.000010794834,0.00010374171],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962761,0.001082876,0.0005117518,0.0001481728,0.0015990887,0.00038203815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959871,0.0003515061,0.0011096946,0.00011894304,0.0020559162,0.0003768302],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009044745,0.00012303184,0.00046132237,0.0004742262,0.00049533544,0.011851365,0.0007710035,0.00014340591,0.0000051689135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013960459,0.000103687606,0.00007614177,0.0012713774,0.0009565366,0.047242675,0.00026381708,0.0018319472,6.51871e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001062811,0.0002011363,0.92549634,0.0000024795745,0.00009461563,0.000021399166,0.06596602,0.0000051151806,0.00006951011,0.00007751455,0.0047995825,0.0031599917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086175965,0.0004183308,0.8151752,0.000054010296,0.000028420995,0.0000050522594,0.18112203,0.000028826256,0.000006799031,0.00055815524,0.0016321647,0.0001092837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030308207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019418118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11515602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027795736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038373095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99434537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168669783","doi":"10.3138/jsp.34.4.181","title":"Looking Back on the Future History of the ‘Book’: The Council of Editors of Learned Journals Keynote Addresses MLA Convention 2002","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Reading (process); Conceptualization; Scholarship; Convention; Point (geometry); Limiting; Sociology; Media studies; History; Computer science; Law; Political science; Social science; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.12040361791206365,"score_gpt":0.24529275624091904,"score_spread":0.12488913832885538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168669783","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36241233,0.121448874,0.000089365494,0.10365187,0.037596166,0.00079695776,0.000082464125,0.0000379851,0.373884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808752,0.00082683633,0.00008168656,0.0012991894,0.0041730218,0.00000300235,0.0000016959352,0.000036270576,0.012703124],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99396574,0.0016255259,0.001391817,0.00014302501,0.0026265304,0.00024738457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870687,0.0010609298,0.0040629664,0.00082970934,0.0068923733,0.00008532071],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017486088,0.00019974302,0.0004288792,0.00024110962,0.00056920474,0.0070990263,0.0025430212,0.00019304027,0.0014937673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012621127,0.00010100492,0.00046638458,0.00022154396,0.00047575877,0.030747946,0.00014425501,0.0035149925,0.00000384124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013281316,0.0002683341,0.0015574573,0.00009130749,0.0003398655,0.0000016692827,0.04574863,0.00013572721,0.0026419866,0.08193413,0.8654264,0.0017216535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005927776,0.00014235133,0.001716553,0.00073312945,0.00011860071,0.000019111852,0.010643075,0.000012718093,0.00060083676,0.0024929827,0.98281413,0.000113745125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015757467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013545403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61846286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008206126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022352387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170382274","doi":"10.1353/scp.2004.0004","title":"Scribble, Scribble, Toil and Trouble: Forced Productivity in the Modern University","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Higher Education Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Variety (cybernetics); History; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.030325050058908242,"score_gpt":0.2675585282428005,"score_spread":0.2372334781838923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170382274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.921907,0.00071413023,0.0004694509,0.03891937,0.00064157695,0.00015564887,0.0000027616604,0.000009797792,0.03718028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99385595,0.00018635677,0.0020109562,0.00067527476,0.00020581893,6.8299863e-7,3.7579974e-7,0.000004903308,0.0030596484],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787056,0.0005733893,0.00024969314,0.00014864352,0.00090518326,0.00025254083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859345,0.00015318238,0.0003070342,0.00012296671,0.0006921736,0.00013119275],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008130481,0.00007813877,0.00014387108,0.0001858126,0.0005135661,0.004943452,0.00051293103,0.000095082076,0.000031065094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035406803,0.00006205953,0.00004154102,0.0007102767,0.0000825089,0.04107048,0.000029730394,0.00082248315,0.0000015814599],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013907862,0.0005243025,0.40231213,0.000032823482,0.000087010514,0.000106256164,0.22859597,0.00008461718,0.0005993822,0.24139954,0.09023779,0.0358811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001080701,0.000046757184,0.18875305,0.00007522874,0.000020447707,0.000037765454,0.034375712,0.0000049199743,0.00005749044,0.0204149,0.7549425,0.00019058048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00094049046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00077538594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6647047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030858314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011729749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2218600740","doi":"10.3138/jsp.46.4.04","title":"The Case for Long Books","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Publication; History; Library science; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.14101296754442544,"score_gpt":0.2696137709571317,"score_spread":0.12860080341270624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2218600740","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42935616,0.0057255174,0.00020396509,0.014819154,0.0065218313,0.000313192,0.00004370045,0.00005630257,0.54296017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96038985,0.000009924682,0.000140238,0.0010053107,0.0039954633,0.000005538764,0.0000025474294,0.000027840293,0.03442326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984308,0.0000691227,0.0005759814,0.00010009433,0.00052079663,0.0003032459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99520195,0.00041321272,0.00047808955,0.0001818574,0.0034455,0.00027940675],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005124955,0.00012445655,0.00018394897,0.00014726138,0.0010230419,0.15802474,0.0007337055,0.00006133792,0.00006187813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041602384,0.00007675447,0.00019907765,0.000033872537,0.00014614467,0.09133312,0.000094326344,0.00095187884,0.000008760016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116656054,0.000041175525,0.00025653688,0.000014258903,0.00009017777,0.00072847964,0.012802358,0.000002839591,0.000001892914,0.70392925,0.2566045,0.02541189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070708495,0.00027131406,0.000024446425,0.000043071497,0.000033901608,0.0014181278,0.025739983,0.000013089663,0.000009324237,0.03936578,0.9322576,0.00011627489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000069654925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00078539917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6756531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010956073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002039457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92137593},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2254394995","doi":"10.3138/jsp.47.2.213","title":"A Letter to the Editor: Comment, Reply, and Etiquette","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Writing and Publishing","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Etiquette; Civility; Citation; Epistemology; Computer science; Linguistics; Law; Library science; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.036650579882567744,"score_gpt":0.24199042016960992,"score_spread":0.20533984028704216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254394995","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000121098485,0.001193153,0.000079166275,0.9605947,0.015569549,0.00017121539,0.00011059087,0.00004842157,0.022112088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00024188466,0.00005487642,0.00010167006,0.61489344,0.37750268,0.0000056879835,0.000010542964,0.00005626306,0.0071329526],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954725,0.00056342647,0.0011561891,0.0003846708,0.0017415822,0.0006816663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946168,0.0012707269,0.0015117727,0.0004970402,0.0018696472,0.00023399219],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008917888,0.00039964254,0.0005823306,0.0006562036,0.0008521328,0.10198647,0.0023529858,0.0008478393,0.00034054127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005661697,0.00022525557,0.0002737995,0.0000939401,0.00019659003,0.05528631,0.000521856,0.017412798,0.00003489401],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012069846,0.0000048501543,0.000060625764,0.000048159036,0.00010756601,0.0000902423,0.0071954452,1.5784317e-7,0.0000062215418,0.0013214287,0.98806447,0.0030887523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003195681,0.000086259985,0.000013341168,0.0010234797,0.000089291636,0.00013014158,0.0007431346,6.0309e-7,0.0000025299069,0.0013553355,0.99591315,0.00032316384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002062214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026880745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3619331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001871757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017887248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98485404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256419905","doi":"10.3138/jsp.47.2.106","title":"The Price of University Press Books, 2012–14","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Publishing; Closing (real estate); Library science; Sociology; Economics; Political science; Law; Computer science; Accounting","score_opus":0.04221417619652325,"score_gpt":0.21593973932969066,"score_spread":0.1737255631331674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256419905","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24775958,0.01228568,0.0014246008,0.10218444,0.004339082,0.00029018353,0.00009131518,0.000112269365,0.6315128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95213217,0.0008735499,0.00037233782,0.00018068451,0.0008238216,4.322825e-7,0.0000013844178,0.00001776985,0.045597855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782765,0.0005286123,0.0005412357,0.00010620354,0.0007656984,0.0002305932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99376655,0.0011248147,0.0011033776,0.0004755712,0.0033893166,0.0001403818],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073418254,0.0001065016,0.00019598646,0.00020583204,0.00076617807,0.025640775,0.0023551018,0.0000953674,0.00007664723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057866443,0.0000585682,0.00015844099,0.000084296116,0.00023015759,0.15385309,0.00026740658,0.0011207856,0.0000034791144],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022655731,0.00010738204,0.0015431136,0.000016306598,0.00018639321,0.000008816611,0.0065081944,0.0000019516078,0.0013174039,0.6705433,0.2856903,0.03385025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005926784,0.000080212565,0.00272968,0.00014139096,0.000029275201,0.000012032086,0.0020803995,0.0000024798703,0.00011551846,0.0021301713,0.9919975,0.000088704095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014955133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000894782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7063071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013687141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020233753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9753707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261976862","doi":"10.3138/jsp.47.2.147","title":"Publishing Undergraduate Research: Linking Teaching and Research through a Dedicated Peer-Reviewed Open Access Journal","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Higher Education Practises and Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Work (physics); Discipline; Process (computing); Peer review; Quality (philosophy); Public relations; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.5479534976218382,"score_gpt":0.5658860954472149,"score_spread":0.017932597825376706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261976862","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072859764,0.002949694,0.0016868983,0.85091424,0.0020659245,0.00042960857,0.0000037830816,0.000031112133,0.06905896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96770966,0.007696472,0.009860041,0.0017071436,0.0045915185,0.000014960958,0.0000025378367,0.000052151427,0.008365502],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97255033,0.015850773,0.0014647585,0.00049274,0.008272412,0.0013689637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97241205,0.007121974,0.0015820337,0.00047141893,0.017182523,0.0012299826],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2771217,0.00019569775,0.00045874406,0.0014563714,0.008916861,0.4328944,0.0080743125,0.00035240132,0.0003066757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22355494,0.00013486325,0.00013865498,0.0022988694,0.0005049698,0.47425357,0.0032032994,0.014180244,0.000018684072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008234582,0.0002161258,0.012887753,0.000040692707,0.00017750895,0.00010327451,0.031568345,0.0000022390454,0.00051808055,0.11639329,0.6146766,0.22333376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009821255,0.00010528657,0.0031993145,0.0014956166,0.000025764699,0.00009297644,0.019603174,0.0000014253768,0.000018493978,0.12953655,0.84477043,0.00016881149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048148264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046755705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8948499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014601026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038146405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99729246},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2265376573","doi":"10.3138/jsp.47.2.105","title":"Farewell Note from the Editor","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Legal Cases and Commentary","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.02045226979077633,"score_gpt":0.2612111700895826,"score_spread":0.24075890029880628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265376573","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5595231,0.002036975,0.0012737629,0.42821956,0.006786918,0.000086409,0.000029101604,0.000017356624,0.002026787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94440395,0.00011693257,0.0015507365,0.018465802,0.035088524,8.6066177e-7,0.0000030323897,0.000018654475,0.00035152724],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840665,0.00007374019,0.00039396007,0.000102946025,0.00084537367,0.00017730311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980198,0.0004830864,0.0003202157,0.0002603411,0.0006924534,0.00022406084],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012700105,0.00009323523,0.00019526777,0.00007575332,0.0001104497,0.0048816195,0.00046528794,0.00009217651,0.0003725028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030408255,0.00003968676,0.00018538498,0.00013165378,0.000031855165,0.028265214,0.00011125099,0.0011050944,0.000026023732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025649482,0.000068788766,0.053024158,0.0000040730965,0.00010480933,0.0001812905,0.00025711372,2.1621443e-7,0.026846852,0.00012741335,0.8708474,0.048281394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00216393,0.0002274045,0.074634776,0.0003846747,0.00012385825,0.00024115664,0.000285407,0.00000214917,0.0011440775,0.0006376057,0.92007685,0.0000780875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022155653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009515736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40975377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001623495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017067432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265448396","doi":"10.3138/jsp.47.2.121","title":"The Research Contributions of Editorial Board Members in Library and Information Science","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Accounting Education and Careers","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Editorial board; Citation; Productivity; On board; Library science; Institutional review board; Political science; Psychology; History; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.01962536937135523,"score_gpt":0.2768465446780073,"score_spread":0.25722117530665206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265448396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8698923,0.00018237578,0.00004753601,0.08836534,0.016474683,0.00013045364,0.0000030211936,0.000016020971,0.024888301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892881,0.00008930613,0.000060470065,0.0004343407,0.010078577,0.0000016223253,7.4735533e-7,0.0000040218333,0.000042837873],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808186,0.00002883648,0.00042311713,0.00006310102,0.0011955901,0.00020751708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99603254,0.00038768974,0.0005022347,0.00011197579,0.0029382422,0.000027310833],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010041483,0.000046884405,0.00008681522,0.0010301358,0.00038079603,0.022425879,0.0006504837,0.00006634009,0.000017808168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01956124,0.00002658156,0.000028433697,0.0014580364,0.00025462496,0.43554685,0.00022326106,0.0005899236,0.000003832718],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016836208,0.000045721365,0.17804497,0.000045773897,0.000017612507,0.0000012733983,0.00043417246,0.000005487483,0.004332068,0.38864017,0.40436175,0.023902625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077757187,0.000011947303,0.08059512,0.00016493617,0.000006228994,0.0000021485912,0.0027988167,0.000021711465,0.00017789847,0.0047260136,0.91065955,0.00005804137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000065521424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004465813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5062978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000641908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039900103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9886974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268906875","doi":"10.3138/jsp.47.2.180","title":"What We Still Don't Know About Peer Review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Empirical research; Comprehension; Mechanism (biology); Process (computing); Field (mathematics); Production (economics); Object (grammar); Sociology; Epistemology; Peer review; Social science; Political science; Computer science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.5966307666371715,"score_gpt":0.48922548105245833,"score_spread":0.10740528558471318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268906875","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011079161,0.4421746,0.008635371,0.5234832,0.0042964374,0.0004563098,0.000013565787,0.0000075386747,0.009853771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13734895,0.3258809,0.025529733,0.028527312,0.0039113928,0.000026209022,0.0000052409287,0.000114932736,0.47865534],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.937587,0.011641482,0.018638214,0.0008849042,0.030718017,0.00053038064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8871267,0.010855345,0.030927459,0.005519177,0.06438092,0.0011904385],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.47334042,0.00034665747,0.0040833103,0.0010056151,0.00016537252,0.15201586,0.006720584,0.00020637436,0.018896837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.57074726,0.00012353559,0.0031309945,0.002165444,0.000059785874,0.19681317,0.00035329125,0.0012344472,0.0019514766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037267603,0.000022839004,0.00420065,0.00008503403,0.00014242234,0.000021691594,0.00017692221,8.527618e-7,0.00013888572,0.00076821476,0.70270914,0.2917296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031043257,0.000045456898,0.0036912707,0.008830402,0.00027840605,0.00020453556,0.0006150567,0.000009532653,0.00001529191,0.009112124,0.9767192,0.0001683165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000035045368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008478891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49495593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014478354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030936132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270325443","doi":"10.3138/jsp.47.2.171","title":"How Much Are PhD Students Publishing before Graduation?: An Examination of Four Social Science Disciplines","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Graduation (instrument); Publishing; Curriculum; Sociology; Productivity; Social science; Discipline; Library science; Political science; Public relations; Pedagogy; Engineering; Economic growth; Law","score_opus":0.35063224346182026,"score_gpt":0.49922527154958546,"score_spread":0.1485930280877652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270325443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8752009,0.000100363475,0.0011115471,0.11993908,0.0022816807,0.00021752946,0.000033233307,0.000028603221,0.0010870569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994362,0.000034936627,0.0010564474,0.00030505864,0.0028409346,0.00001391518,0.000007255168,0.000024176623,0.0013552664],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99472004,0.0006559021,0.001064137,0.00029874552,0.0027323284,0.0005288367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98549217,0.00034326373,0.002670534,0.00028642823,0.010796571,0.00041100837],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013314202,0.00016792123,0.00036156958,0.001033931,0.0021172417,0.013367033,0.0018626798,0.000296696,0.000058238453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020913484,0.00011314695,0.00012699743,0.0011655475,0.0002146735,0.21201472,0.00039374043,0.0016116325,0.000003208107],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007660398,0.0010032036,0.6653055,0.00025377108,0.00013710033,0.000009632829,0.068576545,0.0000026677812,0.008254535,0.069419146,0.019529486,0.1674318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011605041,0.00012614703,0.9273074,0.00053045625,0.0000325501,0.0000064943238,0.05999636,0.000014240732,0.000035735993,0.0070080124,0.0036499805,0.00013208027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035536443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001584234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26200193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007823372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011939962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99918187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317949269","doi":"10.1353/scp.2013.0009","title":"Signing Up with Morris","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"American Sports and Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Morris water navigation task; Medicine; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.01842900824690999,"score_gpt":0.19576749252416942,"score_spread":0.17733848427725943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317949269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64634055,0.0013897376,0.00033789483,0.013080614,0.0017356604,0.00016146958,0.0000088271845,0.000056286197,0.33688894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96084684,0.000008333684,0.0014654816,0.00240267,0.002348356,0.0000024659948,0.000002998032,0.000025582862,0.032897297],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863976,0.00003573366,0.00039824512,0.00011059899,0.0005892636,0.00022638659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970913,0.00004824889,0.00059931196,0.00013343127,0.0019418276,0.00018588857],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000648301,0.00012838442,0.00023572671,0.0002447227,0.00027596936,0.05718052,0.00039948148,0.000057240108,0.0074808695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023557179,0.0000783499,0.000090077556,0.00009060499,0.000109957124,0.09753289,0.00003797342,0.0013675214,0.00002059431],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056949757,0.000081326456,0.01328853,0.000026314352,0.00019440294,0.00013428599,0.08103414,0.000024735014,0.00037017977,0.059113882,0.81500244,0.030672831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043684797,0.00024278818,0.0030448702,0.0001656208,0.000033454377,0.0001125126,0.027847186,0.000012211455,0.000016935295,0.0004992629,0.9674139,0.00017439006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036535657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019659168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31450626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039780254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001012196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99342644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317955904","doi":"10.3138/jsp.47.3.227","title":"The <i>Journal of Scholarly Publishing</i> in the Ecosystem of Scholarly Communications","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Library Science and Information","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Publishing; Scientific communication; Library science; Ecosystem; Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Computer science; Ecology; Biology; Law","score_opus":0.03762006889906457,"score_gpt":0.24304596268759876,"score_spread":0.20542589378853418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317955904","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46337342,0.0077963937,0.06694598,0.4404703,0.003880828,0.0005677283,0.000031076725,0.000052707324,0.016881546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847704,0.0010658238,0.011075053,0.0025942058,0.00038897753,0.0000026553412,0.0000010893666,0.000012683199,0.00008911998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909511,0.0017426662,0.002882992,0.00018740982,0.003700337,0.0005354823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829616,0.002466757,0.0047134417,0.0018956199,0.007668322,0.00029424758],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04870056,0.00021559201,0.0004282646,0.0011538772,0.0007726603,0.20360611,0.023392048,0.0002730756,0.0000074361697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021653123,0.00010294235,0.0002895718,0.002811585,0.0001941296,0.82206386,0.0012468374,0.004062454,0.000009002582],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002471927,0.0006808312,0.12005961,0.00010673725,0.0003254346,0.000063193576,0.034816522,0.00015110923,0.016152129,0.37640232,0.14542323,0.3055717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0078413775,0.0022627413,0.16552243,0.0037704366,0.00012749787,0.003656428,0.02263776,0.0024355059,0.0039175507,0.06510426,0.7217179,0.0010061334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000048942053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044037948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61845773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024721565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001402674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318885919","doi":"10.3138/jsp.47.3.284","title":"Burn This Article: An Inflammatory View of Peer Review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Censorship; Hierarchy; Fell; Style (visual arts); History; Sociology; Classics; Media studies; Political science; Law; Geography; Archaeology; Cartography","score_opus":0.04486223243767581,"score_gpt":0.32760418663515056,"score_spread":0.2827419541974748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318885919","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19127755,0.03683248,0.0012956045,0.33440432,0.0016313345,0.0003082351,0.000046600024,0.00005754332,0.43414634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809251,0.0059809973,0.001710945,0.004804148,0.0013029871,0.0000013888131,8.949642e-7,0.000011052363,0.0052625244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966753,0.00045473178,0.0006704542,0.00009353433,0.0018536493,0.0002522885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927257,0.00032163388,0.00074788823,0.0001652061,0.005670595,0.00036902848],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010165929,0.00008029028,0.0002761802,0.00011083264,0.00023409775,0.0020376015,0.0007062171,0.0001024215,0.000788757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020686934,0.000052686788,0.0001356166,0.00030246438,0.00044252726,0.04506056,0.000049262468,0.0004990793,0.00001607227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011044996,0.00005707897,0.016526671,0.00008634659,0.000045597862,0.00002236944,0.0009162109,4.7691077e-7,0.0009928154,0.8896955,0.053106602,0.03853929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019287298,0.000052221752,0.0024680193,0.0014165136,0.00004219248,0.000024933372,0.0004170853,1.482734e-7,0.000058712274,0.002449017,0.9927914,0.00008686504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002470238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004465445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9396848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015947026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022969474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989984},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2320267223","doi":"10.1353/scp.2010.0007","title":"Project Muse and the E-Consolidation of Journals","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consolidation (business); Business; Computer science; Operations management; Process management; Engineering; Accounting","score_opus":0.06678216481951404,"score_gpt":0.26437585653328405,"score_spread":0.19759369171377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320267223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8601788,0.00051069475,0.000008711894,0.0042915503,0.0011223101,0.00011123716,0.000012524768,0.000008659653,0.1337555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967902,0.00011218056,0.00018022612,0.0005192048,0.0014544295,0.0000015044498,0.0000012370224,0.000013517937,0.00092753896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822664,0.00012240456,0.0007374122,0.000085571,0.00066187914,0.00016611892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963449,0.0003907543,0.0009778192,0.0001648647,0.0020371175,0.00008449091],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058893454,0.00011030009,0.00028107682,0.00046825458,0.00036994377,0.05557933,0.00060021575,0.0000769966,0.00039484084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043684538,0.000063883344,0.00015419934,0.00008546687,0.00043767344,0.078839906,0.00009638964,0.0020044225,0.0000015946833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023949187,0.00008815156,0.0020398528,0.000039366147,0.00014069493,0.000013938851,0.05413441,8.094947e-7,0.0007387824,0.9099277,0.010463213,0.022173574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041958364,0.0002746429,0.0035737795,0.0003063592,0.00015759637,0.00045697365,0.038742065,0.0000219368,0.00036852568,0.054212768,0.89741844,0.00027106676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000158363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035302198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88695526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013261929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013800705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9454011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320375794","doi":"10.1353/scp.2013.0011","title":"Getting into Print: Morris Philipson, the Hard Way","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"History and Developments in Astronomy","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics","score_opus":0.013378677919682187,"score_gpt":0.21840657559859775,"score_spread":0.20502789767891555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320375794","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87764996,0.00037590344,0.04270687,0.014581264,0.002418743,0.00028350865,0.0000028843024,0.000030407982,0.061950482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.956534,0.0000012332437,0.039451607,0.00053306815,0.0018110855,0.0000131023435,0.0000028159598,0.000021515054,0.0016315482],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817574,0.00012685717,0.00067448855,0.00016327976,0.0005543218,0.00030532698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977904,0.00012461045,0.0007077784,0.0002610383,0.0009087284,0.00020744458],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00219421,0.0001619372,0.00022535432,0.0001649988,0.0005368747,0.012477246,0.0010317354,0.00006392545,0.0012942036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032044627,0.00010999137,0.00017264984,0.00022624768,0.000061447296,0.043779965,0.0001913332,0.0018315291,0.00011393799],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011804745,0.00011748138,0.19704306,0.00001232796,0.00029091357,0.0000049561518,0.005801613,0.00011364589,0.0020750142,0.008816452,0.12113914,0.6645736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007739913,0.000047743597,0.10243181,0.0001275316,0.000041619827,0.000016554475,0.005378658,0.000040651084,0.00077025243,0.01591692,0.8741515,0.00030272445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015183157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.6587e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7530124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013192503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002172908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322690092","doi":"10.3138/jsp.47.3.231","title":"A Survey of Social Science Journal Editors for Behind-the-Scenes Data on the Publication Process","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Face (sociological concept); Quality (philosophy); Sociology; Public relations; Process (computing); Library science; Social science; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.6898950649847486,"score_gpt":0.5711992726196081,"score_spread":0.1186957923651405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322690092","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6938434,0.0006755136,0.014626514,0.27763057,0.00977943,0.00055417675,0.00038968818,0.000010443286,0.0024902385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995875,0.00004110406,0.00034054945,0.000356972,0.0030748062,0.0000028519391,0.0000020788068,0.000010809845,0.0002958156],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9739874,0.0007294531,0.0017567261,0.00048853975,0.02240827,0.000629583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79100937,0.03489612,0.006881628,0.0021104817,0.16425006,0.00085232564],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.35873595,0.00013025355,0.00032468914,0.02571731,0.001753381,0.1313211,0.02284872,0.00013958865,0.00010598024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7175693,0.000048254733,0.00016134154,0.07521176,0.0006696676,0.111660846,0.0012446345,0.0013176369,0.0000075222324],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014119205,0.00018721035,0.12756017,0.0000047063995,0.00004680681,0.0000017461795,0.00055733806,0.0000032977098,0.0020390372,0.0019193263,0.61681455,0.2507246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012739016,0.00049779785,0.85067445,0.000082729224,0.000023782863,0.00007213163,0.001776964,0.0006032079,0.002044131,0.013936024,0.1288125,0.00020236199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002407654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000100473935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7231143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022417826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029020123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324359384","doi":"10.3138/jsp.47.3.250","title":"Fulfilling the Cultural without Forsaking the Commercial: University Presses in the Philippines from the Perspective of Three Directors","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Professionalization; Context (archaeology); Competition (biology); Perspective (graphical); Management; Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Library science; Public relations; Social science; Economics; Law; History","score_opus":0.08445277724786933,"score_gpt":0.2596894477143626,"score_spread":0.17523667046649327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324359384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8066927,0.0037939302,0.00014665314,0.17873706,0.00062617083,0.00020800445,0.000039240495,0.000019327907,0.009736876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976597,0.00027497715,0.00005971261,0.000661184,0.0011974439,0.000001695176,0.0000028490078,0.000012622628,0.00012982008],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705607,0.0012204304,0.0004927006,0.0001446167,0.00085693365,0.00022927397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991716,0.0044720066,0.0009982472,0.0006614889,0.002109486,0.000042736476],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006930161,0.00016069021,0.00024344571,0.0001246899,0.0017334246,0.021875527,0.0043606455,0.00008125213,0.000066225184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008362389,0.000052931355,0.00021340654,0.00025157825,0.0005008185,0.049525224,0.0003135954,0.0019833453,0.0000012339218],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031097664,0.00020494577,0.20634668,0.000011022621,0.00055900216,0.000009092232,0.4408283,0.000057032194,0.0009921495,0.29717967,0.02673612,0.026765024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001204231,0.00010291318,0.30607343,0.00070500193,0.00022990374,0.000018083028,0.29762197,0.00004776324,0.00006008353,0.032933123,0.36075762,0.00024589515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076091597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013893395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33402148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016443258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012912476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2325172486","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0038","title":"Minding the Gap: Editing across Languages and Disciplines","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Digital Rights Management and Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Programming language; Linguistics","score_opus":0.025563186018036282,"score_gpt":0.3019070484029068,"score_spread":0.2763438623848705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2325172486","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8956854,0.0013998866,0.017839735,0.06527284,0.00081656897,0.000080781705,0.0000017124196,0.000053141142,0.01884997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99427176,0.000019210716,0.00367923,0.0008858879,0.00081827416,2.3456543e-7,4.0802456e-7,0.0000034659536,0.0003215484],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861693,0.0000482811,0.00032635493,0.00014236465,0.0006144447,0.00025159956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887913,0.00013997247,0.00036877664,0.00019442331,0.00031037998,0.000107312975],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029094254,0.00009531916,0.00013670448,0.00012245463,0.00038177997,0.07434867,0.0015068789,0.000048146307,0.0000014890218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012318126,0.000053775766,0.00006942158,0.00035212623,0.00003393532,0.11244779,0.00038369972,0.00066175073,0.0000012437393],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000147024875,0.0001214109,0.01209397,0.000024119161,0.000077029006,0.0003004025,0.019753011,0.000026904789,0.00076485425,0.27864876,0.01856301,0.6696118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026675814,0.0007397031,0.43073466,0.00081683794,0.00007422213,0.0009066203,0.017194103,0.004716084,0.0011961983,0.383632,0.15633236,0.0009896053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000046606806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000070798105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6686222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002472214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021632657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92661226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2330130876","doi":"10.1353/scp.2008.0000","title":"New Typographic Design (review)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Technology's Impact on Media","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Typography; Typeface; Publishing; Book design; Calligraphy; Reading (process); Copying; Nothing; Art; Painting; Graphic design; Art history; Visual arts; Literature; Linguistics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2637715464447291,"score_gpt":0.3807473063909023,"score_spread":0.11697575994617321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2330130876","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2825178,0.23488078,0.30113715,0.1659532,0.006270466,0.00067605,0.000008068719,0.0003338527,0.008222664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62411904,0.028709918,0.32520634,0.01535928,0.0021086268,0.000003701023,0.000001105992,0.00008189938,0.004410101],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918493,0.00060977275,0.0018741728,0.00032310243,0.0048797997,0.00046383424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905939,0.0020265253,0.0020702155,0.00088424445,0.0036201137,0.0008050042],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.024066601,0.00020329293,0.0006860018,0.002138739,0.00023865623,0.008970993,0.0045591695,0.00033486146,0.0006811571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17011514,0.0001386008,0.0003863923,0.004000351,0.00013024679,0.08715613,0.00025295065,0.0031580785,0.0001764442],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024268833,0.000023718096,0.018949952,0.0000049011182,0.000032859807,0.00023355684,0.00021580345,0.000013480134,0.0006810595,0.00031087504,0.84477264,0.1347369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002222294,0.0007629982,0.23086917,0.0010626728,0.000107979984,0.009046815,0.00077891233,0.000034902696,0.00092817436,0.07811111,0.67551804,0.0005569469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001930197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002746795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34160122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013713156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014452579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332700944","doi":"10.3138/jsp.47.3.267","title":"Hidden Lessons for Developing Journals: A Case of North American Academics Publishing in South Korea","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Audience measurement; Competition (biology); Political science; State (computer science); Media studies; Library science; Public relations; History; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.12383185424699752,"score_gpt":0.3555821946753171,"score_spread":0.23175034042831957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2332700944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8794818,0.0011418584,0.003578473,0.11297728,0.0005824505,0.0001792878,0.00007795015,0.000024709438,0.0019561872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899089,0.0004311885,0.007426116,0.00063309295,0.0013991514,0.0000055092937,8.0965236e-7,0.00002120429,0.00017404358],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961625,0.00040326713,0.0013290026,0.00023486467,0.0011118323,0.000758564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992842,0.002026788,0.0016523899,0.00013588114,0.0028326875,0.00051022554],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008155402,0.00018234125,0.0006523896,0.0007035901,0.00062556175,0.0067184116,0.0011497495,0.0002019594,0.000010771276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061581444,0.00012528284,0.0002533588,0.0015163415,0.00042241966,0.048238244,0.00019622156,0.001574969,0.0000011676616],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017991982,0.00011727059,0.5019528,0.00005717506,0.00019146185,0.00043920064,0.04310332,0.0000029214184,0.000110566536,0.10202143,0.008927841,0.34289604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0052833413,0.00057988946,0.5568302,0.0021284167,0.000265755,0.00073107786,0.05744431,0.000014799745,0.00017555719,0.05934646,0.3158958,0.0013044005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024951522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005814838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34159166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010816638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009287605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336334100","doi":"10.3138/x474-2265-55w7-2036","title":"Angela Thody. <i>Writing and Presenting Research</i>. London: Sage Publications, 2006. Pp. xvi, 264. Paper: ISBN-13 978-1-4129-0293-9, UK£19.99.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"SAGE; Media studies; Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.062422369257707236,"score_gpt":0.33000031449646683,"score_spread":0.2675779452387596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336334100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3121244,0.14428827,0.0006239118,0.038034674,0.0013679882,0.0005153937,0.00009001593,0.00018903526,0.5027663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679642,0.003650174,0.0034026708,0.0021325494,0.009281306,0.000014840663,0.000030817464,0.00010365138,0.013419826],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99355733,0.00055843446,0.0016742771,0.0005244255,0.0025547405,0.0011307653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915908,0.0016198528,0.0012245623,0.00059094466,0.004431237,0.00054262794],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0257151,0.00035542803,0.0006491479,0.0014016081,0.0026157605,0.059650134,0.001388568,0.00020914226,0.0016415685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013920011,0.00030158708,0.0003241347,0.0007399174,0.0006833722,0.06554519,0.00079017744,0.003712123,0.000018359106],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009842981,0.0004313236,0.07770956,0.00020909343,0.0012817302,0.00056381646,0.052703086,0.000017380984,0.001715858,0.13721535,0.6521953,0.07585909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001004412,0.000119124416,0.0108646555,0.000513359,0.00023943884,0.00020524733,0.11338231,0.000019891673,0.00013165308,0.0065636383,0.86645764,0.00049860246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011750055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032382829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65583974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021632056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025300862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2463470524","doi":"10.3138/jsp.47.4.328","title":"Teaching Publishing as Information Technology: A Description of a Structural Editing Curriculum at a South African University","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Open Education and E-Learning","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Curriculum; XML; Perspective (graphical); Work (physics); Computer science; Key (lock); Sociology; Knowledge management; Information technology; Engineering ethics; World Wide Web; Political science; Pedagogy; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.013744999183784797,"score_gpt":0.221482248235844,"score_spread":0.2077372490520592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2463470524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91928625,0.00004190685,0.040233444,0.029147714,0.0010682943,0.00008838335,0.000002915625,0.00009882454,0.010032292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97269845,0.0000035665996,0.02663288,0.00015313107,0.0002478903,3.835508e-7,0.000001706145,0.000006637355,0.00025534834],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765354,0.00026076616,0.0006567473,0.00018474465,0.0009188247,0.00032536293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953277,0.00011459152,0.0020477958,0.00026208375,0.0020321086,0.00021571612],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038882324,0.00014059464,0.00024240147,0.0015842604,0.00056193955,0.01912444,0.0021274139,0.0002109828,0.000025224164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012935956,0.00010769776,0.00011914413,0.0011523325,0.000057692036,0.3402716,0.0007772885,0.0017224782,0.0000102207705],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008520203,0.00010305916,0.38316724,0.00008467052,0.00017716062,0.000041308234,0.05821668,0.00014015692,0.013843356,0.26577902,0.0077063777,0.27065575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010193428,0.0015575934,0.17892025,0.0039344635,0.0002083092,0.0029890733,0.5416354,0.008219883,0.0027255735,0.031675857,0.21600966,0.0019305303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002137833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010276438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4834187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006701489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036590648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2468126847","doi":"10.3138/jsp.47.4.336","title":"Observations on Revised Art History Dissertations Published by University Presses","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Library science; Multidisciplinary approach; Focus (optics); History; Sociology; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.06568084221629385,"score_gpt":0.21727696648277145,"score_spread":0.15159612426647762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2468126847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28608578,0.0033548512,0.0014034086,0.2698688,0.0043313038,0.0002717561,0.00021692233,0.00031348306,0.4341537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8743407,0.00034462017,0.00088780833,0.0018835717,0.0008901363,0.0000032404168,0.00011663836,0.000045456534,0.121487804],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976724,0.00039460362,0.00062787026,0.00021808282,0.0008304611,0.00025657998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99411935,0.00076618517,0.0009732721,0.0005597913,0.0033186392,0.0002627459],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026606903,0.00017270132,0.00027013596,0.000587616,0.00060589856,0.02661999,0.0018505077,0.00013578386,0.0013505579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011262623,0.00012582417,0.00018480878,0.0001714082,0.00014461791,0.21424714,0.0001051314,0.0013194943,0.000038748858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005547488,0.00016540124,0.0023544861,0.00000832487,0.00006749031,0.000005117524,0.0028260779,0.0000017096229,0.0026676573,0.12786931,0.8609995,0.0029794273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007742864,0.00011118134,0.0065845447,0.00025651394,0.00004631976,0.000004633735,0.001399657,0.000004028398,0.000030142754,0.0015711846,0.9890428,0.00017468465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010538137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012899838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5882549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074581354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003845257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2468380519","doi":"10.3138/jsp.47.4.347","title":"A Scientometric Analysis of Scholarly Publication in the Fields of Management, Operations, Economics, and Business from Iran","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Web of science; Scientometrics; Library science; Political science; Bibliometrics; Social science; Sociology; Computer science; Law; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.37069782300633775,"score_gpt":0.46499292305470313,"score_spread":0.09429510004836539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2468380519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97075564,0.0016374,0.008471626,0.017021611,0.00024069582,0.00013189913,0.00006500321,0.0000020863931,0.0016740642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944017,0.0018852089,0.0032165614,0.0002465334,0.0000605182,0.0000022856213,0.0000037734471,0.0000049482005,0.00017845577],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911369,0.00049939007,0.0018950263,0.0004139903,0.0057645584,0.00029014653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9774351,0.00443429,0.0013613695,0.00080701814,0.015727034,0.00023515415],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06928861,0.00011140809,0.0004963347,0.17130075,0.00015434004,0.06917071,0.004526788,0.0001608977,0.000134045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13462634,0.000058507576,0.00019018189,0.29647022,0.0001483629,0.10024005,0.0005918857,0.00058103714,0.000003169956],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031655552,0.0001805347,0.78147274,0.000005261777,0.000253154,0.0000041455155,0.0004662533,0.00020655419,0.0008556276,0.00538309,0.0022416436,0.20889935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080947345,0.00007156936,0.9890478,0.00003132193,0.00009675792,0.000003907071,0.0011787438,0.0008870789,0.00013830789,0.0039538033,0.0037007907,0.00008044634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050015084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016916932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20881891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001330774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021854133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95836323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2468815196","doi":"10.3138/jsp.47.4.307","title":"An Expanded Approach to Evaluating Open Access Journals","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Documentation; Quality (philosophy); Computer science; Incentive; Process (computing); Process management; World Wide Web; Knowledge management; Business; Political science; Advertising; Law","score_opus":0.29698328069141705,"score_gpt":0.502177373625365,"score_spread":0.2051940929339479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2468815196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6956085,0.0006693677,0.044358533,0.07239164,0.0020943475,0.00052557123,0.000012300727,0.000043918175,0.1842958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9666762,0.00016005282,0.023944082,0.0041815387,0.003912798,0.0000058957435,7.5372736e-7,0.00002046809,0.0010982197],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99390167,0.0018098165,0.0008824444,0.00023068745,0.0025652752,0.00061012164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99371344,0.0006651688,0.0010345526,0.00022711436,0.0032901946,0.0010695566],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06833179,0.00014089207,0.0003586076,0.00055894384,0.001000054,0.11049628,0.0077817277,0.0006996629,0.00036359866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052393284,0.00009201236,0.00012011135,0.00086396426,0.00007540371,0.376742,0.00063928857,0.0036766704,0.000014033418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039514186,0.0005554901,0.20483327,0.0000171345,0.00021883856,0.000022573617,0.08079062,0.000086548236,0.023682553,0.06643798,0.2058562,0.41710365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0067940243,0.0011334992,0.13102442,0.0035671203,0.00027744728,0.0005178991,0.12868129,0.0001268365,0.0032721567,0.17928107,0.5433143,0.0020099727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010493938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000070013346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41509366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044789247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011687522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508335130","doi":"10.3138/jsp.43.2.248","title":"Review","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Business","score_opus":0.12555804053609973,"score_gpt":0.289302079951897,"score_spread":0.16374403941579727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508335130","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11172928,0.5061181,0.00078204664,0.013700977,0.003251625,0.00048236875,0.000026089012,0.00023728296,0.36367223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84249896,0.026210802,0.08673453,0.039181508,0.0036603543,0.000008813964,0.000008385011,0.00043296628,0.0012636702],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99690497,0.0002985451,0.0010931878,0.00015216378,0.0012103646,0.0003407822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937203,0.000073951036,0.0016009425,0.00036645998,0.0038097454,0.00042859738],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012820313,0.00015908234,0.00042984902,0.000538618,0.00010899497,0.01286114,0.0016432009,0.0001330321,0.0010294935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018619977,0.00012585118,0.0002825423,0.0009618223,0.000040851857,0.24150155,0.0001598322,0.0027822307,0.0006147111],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006886068,0.00019394266,0.021475289,0.00033150183,0.00017124502,0.00024726495,0.00082658813,4.0904942e-7,0.003328243,0.002972182,0.95122004,0.019164424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013264712,0.00030225993,0.05043251,0.010533238,0.00034133825,0.0025061418,0.00035922584,0.0000028277732,0.00085343374,0.006632766,0.9262957,0.0004141012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003645782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000036237416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7307697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019473766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002777982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510217753","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44.2.004","title":"Caveat Publicatur","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.07517900037508932,"score_gpt":0.2204508547811941,"score_spread":0.1452718544061048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510217753","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12691304,0.015286514,0.00051750557,0.007103915,0.012333497,0.00007484366,0.00008738298,0.000026129492,0.83765715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9492786,0.00018906493,0.0024345915,0.0011509036,0.0015130342,0.0000016319111,0.0000023036016,0.000018029905,0.04541184],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984845,0.000015600785,0.00082506845,0.00016098576,0.00010437383,0.00040945737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981517,0.000056844317,0.0009728165,0.00021896898,0.00030549197,0.00029413175],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00578928,0.000107779495,0.00036181684,0.00056715874,0.00016179933,0.012614726,0.00067920017,0.00011942997,0.0028009294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002775033,0.00010587196,0.00019308005,0.00033015135,0.000048010046,0.09655843,0.00017405917,0.0007077643,0.0022574074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072685,0.000073496034,0.21587475,0.0000063269144,0.00010752375,0.000002176838,0.0011438733,0.0000041759304,0.000015892652,0.171177,0.61057425,0.0010132933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041849524,0.000019983408,0.039707664,0.000011905845,0.000008186849,0.00003974145,0.00096403563,0.00000873936,0.000019723102,0.004410373,0.9542522,0.00013895225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000036140435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.7999044e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8223656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018758996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028547447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985194},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2512784830","doi":"10.3138/jsp.37.2.86","title":"A Cooperative Publishing Model for Sustainable Scholarship","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scholarship; Business model; German; Diversity (politics); Business; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Knowledge management; Management; Marketing; Economics; Computer science; History; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.041120920773687945,"score_gpt":0.2466064629229217,"score_spread":0.20548554214923376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512784830","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6180941,0.0010534856,0.20040712,0.06325846,0.0014137696,0.0009423716,0.00001014228,0.00022590082,0.114594676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845847,0.0000032746148,0.004776119,0.00406723,0.004550892,0.000014623498,0.000058085567,0.00004909829,0.0018959787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972555,0.00002426117,0.0010053503,0.00026542784,0.0008753263,0.0005741553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9808565,0.00010345991,0.0014121094,0.00019821401,0.01739923,0.00003048586],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069461074,0.00024059307,0.00035236703,0.0012717444,0.000742381,0.17872396,0.0009896668,0.00033016028,0.0000365742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011631016,0.00021367529,0.00016873039,0.0019181672,0.000046442598,0.56142026,0.00019234177,0.0017130281,0.0000061003775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019712451,0.00015460262,0.010144598,0.00022459429,0.000045925717,0.00003350216,0.000049851467,0.013178363,0.0014237382,0.865208,0.107497275,0.0018423996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0070763384,0.00009248195,0.033005994,0.00053914957,0.0002671542,0.00007306709,0.003143775,0.11945373,0.00041117705,0.59427196,0.24051853,0.0011466295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003256036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000596475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3826963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019991201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037497384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99669445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516179985","doi":"10.3138/jsp.36.3.145","title":"Scholarship at the Crossroads: The <i>Journal of Markets &amp; Morality</i> Case Study","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.3231458173534072,"score_gpt":0.4453536528718451,"score_spread":0.12220783551843789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2516179985","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9098622,0.0028387357,0.00041587141,0.083376706,0.0025479996,0.00015896156,0.0000041378116,0.000005329825,0.0007900361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923166,0.00012620915,0.0012982634,0.0025380377,0.002346181,0.0000015048306,3.5593618e-7,0.000020112624,0.0013527028],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98637486,0.0032907615,0.003037011,0.0002662265,0.0066123675,0.00041880144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96929836,0.009429735,0.0046753595,0.0011931052,0.015076339,0.0003271104],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16538437,0.00021687517,0.0004721059,0.0006031489,0.0017260403,0.05803823,0.004465945,0.0002317417,0.00043034815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13456026,0.00010024464,0.00033079454,0.00184598,0.0002947257,0.0835249,0.0006112778,0.0053257043,0.000037419402],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006088158,0.0011588241,0.6452723,0.00001564947,0.0002956386,0.00069446256,0.047247205,0.001852947,0.0009293949,0.00060854916,0.20995015,0.09136607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026140604,0.0003273227,0.43038797,0.00026450225,0.00033818602,0.046913456,0.112020835,0.000041636842,0.00020513125,0.021272372,0.38520172,0.00041279366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001648346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00130933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21488433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035526505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010649072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528550417","doi":"10.3138/jsp.48.1.17","title":"The Impact of Disruptive and Sustaining Digital Technologies on Scholarly Journals","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Big Data and Business Intelligence","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Publishing; Disruptive innovation; Innovator; Scholarly communication; Emerging technologies; Disruptive technology; Power (physics); Sociology; Electronic publishing; Public relations; Business; Computer science; Political science; Marketing; The Internet; World Wide Web; Intellectual property; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.06512304406708154,"score_gpt":0.31493600841191705,"score_spread":0.24981296434483552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528550417","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9644828,0.002482175,0.0015849989,0.02662713,0.00043580477,0.000120619,0.000019453335,0.000055770954,0.0041912585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998669,0.00039618145,0.000081430255,0.000095395284,0.00063593994,0.0000011565613,0.0000010052615,0.000020589654,0.00009924779],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773175,0.000021913827,0.00076667604,0.00019191926,0.00091158476,0.00037618252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99391204,0.0005587892,0.0016443406,0.00030576796,0.0035444289,0.00003463485],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035066076,0.00021028554,0.00032045355,0.00083111046,0.00043046975,0.075825,0.0014229113,0.00018230856,0.000028809747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028864227,0.00009497902,0.00019546144,0.000853596,0.00024711317,0.25531587,0.0005659901,0.0012238063,0.000009441676],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037782267,0.0000997335,0.28370032,0.00003562855,0.0002269215,0.000050057457,0.00010497454,0.000014003732,0.00396917,0.017263118,0.008399778,0.6857585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038713822,0.00084476656,0.6551047,0.0060702497,0.00023858924,0.0005774623,0.019159682,0.00016508417,0.0019225234,0.21175854,0.09903234,0.0012546778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000048603462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000035668515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6845038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000115718525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012607143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97931606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528776092","doi":"10.3138/jsp.48.1.1","title":"Chinese Humanities and Social Sciences Scholars' Language Choices in International Scholarly Publishing: A Ten-Year Survey","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; The arts; Citation index; Social science; Humanities; Sociology; Citation; Linguistics; Political science; Art; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.4310339561278515,"score_gpt":0.504655204141219,"score_spread":0.0736212480133675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528776092","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9646768,0.0019976036,0.00023902013,0.02215494,0.001486239,0.00012045561,0.0001084888,0.000019817073,0.00919664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950694,0.00024818166,0.0013125379,0.0009964313,0.00089392107,0.0000027692852,0.0000039949687,0.000020987169,0.0014518162],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9770055,0.0014852113,0.001964551,0.0008500816,0.017807703,0.00088696915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9684187,0.00962424,0.0018219021,0.0004437111,0.019291831,0.00039962024],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16633902,0.00028061253,0.00062236143,0.06421907,0.00084140844,0.506014,0.009120988,0.00040499037,0.00038742519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.48894697,0.00015868056,0.00021884944,0.055454668,0.0005564796,0.46947542,0.0020817784,0.0029866742,0.00003028077],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007057538,0.00010869359,0.9456507,0.0000041010476,0.00003358729,0.000048954393,0.0010118275,0.0000012616624,0.0015516254,0.0016249185,0.008441382,0.04145236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019469458,0.00016717004,0.97144026,0.000078136894,0.0000046651935,0.000069148045,0.0039079795,0.000037904836,0.000058515277,0.006089494,0.015962953,0.00023682194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080110657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005742569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32260793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004244122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008183806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529028042","doi":"10.3138/jsp.48.1.40","title":"George Mackie, <scp>rdi</scp>: Profile of an Influential University Press Book Designer","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Scottish History and National Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exhibition; George (robot); Library science; Art history; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.029750765767324824,"score_gpt":0.21065413185002513,"score_spread":0.1809033660827003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529028042","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.902632,0.0010158619,0.00024624285,0.00051709596,0.0013946809,0.00013306655,0.00012276354,0.000034704135,0.09390357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83187395,0.00011183569,0.0009683425,0.00047562394,0.0027533001,0.0000011084716,0.00001121551,0.00003751935,0.16376711],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818397,0.00022525308,0.0004434736,0.0001499021,0.0008009508,0.00019648398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963058,0.00024839168,0.0007663505,0.00016243872,0.0023344152,0.00018256246],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017782314,0.00011374892,0.00022326331,0.00040151126,0.00035268333,0.0040568598,0.00073220313,0.00011056681,0.0007150342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001711794,0.00008820143,0.00015539739,0.0000711127,0.00017922783,0.109880716,0.000100139245,0.0005118189,0.000011663746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022205574,0.0005732171,0.0051051574,0.000087770604,0.00037507058,0.00016448443,0.008310984,0.000012513159,0.013820061,0.31436265,0.65047044,0.006495634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010925592,0.0001596198,0.006404358,0.00011774426,0.00007266737,0.00002220931,0.0009151434,0.000004096968,0.0024770922,0.00097180303,0.9876905,0.00007220873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017896891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008884798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3372201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015471775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021123556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99697703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529269551","doi":"10.3138/jsp.48.1.53","title":"Creating a National Open Access Journal System: The Korean Journal Publishing Service","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"World Wide Web; Computer science; Publishing; Context (archaeology); Service (business); Electronic publishing; Digital library; Business; The Internet; Political science","score_opus":0.21236292645577715,"score_gpt":0.40496080139609986,"score_spread":0.1925978749403227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529269551","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013932407,0.0008848924,0.40854388,0.5100528,0.0036524057,0.00043948487,0.00001722475,0.00007266803,0.062404234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88103735,0.0012876124,0.09046325,0.013614367,0.011046578,0.000020077918,0.0000051193024,0.00010959672,0.0024160594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98681754,0.0023594713,0.0020354518,0.0004931107,0.0073560164,0.00093841914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9701943,0.0034109228,0.0062478324,0.0011231691,0.017992465,0.0010313146],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08800707,0.0003108059,0.00047624475,0.0016524073,0.0026847809,0.8790041,0.057795633,0.0001903615,0.00006998691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08047595,0.00016385171,0.00024539608,0.0027538508,0.00007418447,0.94612163,0.013481142,0.00577294,0.000017647428],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002552845,0.00031243515,0.017518425,0.00015927003,0.0013349752,0.0016300563,0.0022913057,0.00034973197,0.0019918813,0.44997776,0.39255434,0.13162452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01163209,0.00074129907,0.052418586,0.0076317545,0.0002767538,0.05865203,0.0109384125,0.004793219,0.00044012303,0.063288495,0.78767097,0.0015162724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022963139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000054966007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86710495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014468948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031863684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2572908889","doi":"10.3138/jsp.48.2.99","title":"Building a Scholarly Multimedia Publishing Infrastructure","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Digital Games and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; World Wide Web; Kairos; Electronic publishing; Computer science; Vega; Multimedia; Media studies; Sociology; The Internet; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.033805490872045325,"score_gpt":0.3125762142962443,"score_spread":0.278770723424199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2572908889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5101228,0.0015724866,0.0012147652,0.062161744,0.008739291,0.00027491327,0.000023154947,0.00010743298,0.41578344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95213234,0.00022086025,0.035536613,0.0015030237,0.006386584,0.0000026161147,0.0000026492603,0.00004553505,0.0041697733],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947242,0.00025457406,0.0008821304,0.0003268916,0.0029911269,0.000821044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99118185,0.00037853426,0.0022806828,0.0006248209,0.004361931,0.0011721981],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012361404,0.00024573167,0.00047777992,0.0006214074,0.0016123441,0.49877584,0.0052621397,0.0006262853,0.0001310312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16003665,0.00021769396,0.00033333525,0.00039837536,0.0003978263,0.6002507,0.0006201995,0.004707483,0.000010436677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004952035,0.00006634752,0.054659847,0.000019722851,0.000121099765,0.00019159599,0.011413654,0.000019231566,0.0012200424,0.02777521,0.035898313,0.86856544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011387975,0.00006546814,0.09187106,0.00034722645,0.000044982728,0.000049971062,0.0051610554,0.000018204031,0.000073101706,0.010012174,0.89093876,0.0002792142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061077357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002721207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8682862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047441118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014376956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2576512212","doi":"10.3138/jsp.48.2.73","title":"Special Issue: Digital Publishing for the Humanities and Social Sciences","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Digital humanities; Publishing; Sociology; Humanities; Social science; Library science; Data science; Political science; Computer science; Art","score_opus":0.15841688093927622,"score_gpt":0.2862497180180557,"score_spread":0.1278328370787795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2576512212","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06649686,0.0008430593,0.000027748973,0.04726767,0.007137204,0.0002483766,0.00018154594,0.000034134384,0.8777634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8691087,0.000027271388,0.000095952986,0.003283486,0.095268406,0.0000065651443,0.000006885935,0.000036783746,0.03216597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977085,0.00003728333,0.0006053008,0.00021211104,0.0010083183,0.00042845766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99627787,0.0005800609,0.0011380657,0.00022184085,0.001725286,0.00005688693],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039764512,0.00020544957,0.00031784555,0.00034952347,0.012495438,0.75150365,0.0025711348,0.00010826872,0.00041342076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055712694,0.00013654181,0.00024721882,0.00003717235,0.0019080235,0.3664213,0.0004435382,0.0012499641,0.0000045165016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004746921,0.00003162175,0.0010575557,0.000026743184,0.00008089467,0.000008041505,0.021741642,4.6147363e-7,0.0000015557162,0.5810865,0.3382116,0.057705924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060442014,0.00016614348,0.0015714484,0.00006746712,0.000046202113,0.000030936422,0.030805485,0.000007292616,0.0000025580562,0.022264086,0.94425243,0.000181536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007729586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028940872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84559745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006326194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018976339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98879015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2577652526","doi":"10.3138/jsp.48.2.br","title":"<i>Digital Scholarly Editing: Theories, Models and Methods</i> by Elena Pierazzo","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Data science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06325467530447566,"score_gpt":0.281298527087911,"score_spread":0.21804385178343533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2577652526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.118675396,0.0071603446,0.0015112046,0.009645182,0.0034394057,0.00020206232,0.00029416598,0.00008895689,0.8589833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9715814,0.0001789088,0.0018729985,0.0016234341,0.0043183933,0.000004281207,0.000019596007,0.00007914808,0.020321814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967115,0.00016380372,0.001009071,0.0003558571,0.0011829126,0.0005768524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994107,0.00034957597,0.0016137729,0.00060237135,0.0028244946,0.00050276745],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059582144,0.00036233623,0.00058496656,0.00031803275,0.002742808,0.5391034,0.0022085432,0.00021034399,0.00020572409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008017771,0.0002982436,0.00026446942,0.000044093526,0.00060818036,0.53095126,0.0005715909,0.0030178092,0.000007828966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088997134,0.00012964418,0.0014511046,0.000044628665,0.00022138731,0.000059822978,0.008655797,0.00000198178,0.00018774263,0.796534,0.06877731,0.12384759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009324216,0.00023953627,0.00018538407,0.0002076134,0.000061999985,0.00012240977,0.008108583,0.000033664266,0.00007957408,0.2523546,0.7373013,0.00037292662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000772131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003789087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85290605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010422416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015738682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994695},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2578839377","doi":"10.3138/jsp.48.2.90","title":"Forerunners and Manifold: A Case Study in Iterative Publishing","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scholarship; Workflow; Computer science; Iterative and incremental development; Annotation; Publication; Space (punctuation); Process (computing); Manifold (fluid mechanics); Sociology; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Software engineering; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.10591397434292218,"score_gpt":0.2884231220063476,"score_spread":0.18250914766342544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2578839377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8849507,0.00036231536,0.0000029539117,0.002569495,0.00083303713,0.00018513566,0.000014569682,0.000014859239,0.11106696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99607503,0.0000103258835,0.000094290386,0.0004683647,0.0011829545,0.0000047215867,0.0000015826488,0.000028088687,0.0021346337],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764174,0.0001450774,0.00083299784,0.00025745327,0.0007468097,0.00037593165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99679,0.00019167202,0.001037178,0.00038058273,0.0013505988,0.00024995964],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048698075,0.00022661216,0.00041584086,0.00069518475,0.0016016932,0.46230635,0.001171581,0.00010697564,0.00016077422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004649664,0.00018519654,0.00011802961,0.000048721722,0.00016133164,0.38609806,0.0004348326,0.0022639546,0.000002030218],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019019218,0.0007355511,0.2579876,0.00007055482,0.00030504155,0.033207696,0.36856052,0.000004391786,0.000011788191,0.2940449,0.009150992,0.035730783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0063136127,0.0014532425,0.05558554,0.00064547494,0.00012609822,0.0061306874,0.8075425,0.00005768882,0.0000056080876,0.025402375,0.09596591,0.00077124435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024810454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015480319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.438982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013204536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001095287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2578942293","doi":"10.3138/jsp.48.2.76","title":"Laying Tracks as the Train Approaches: Innovative Open Access Book Publishing at Heidelberg University from the Editors' Point of View","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Linguistic Education and Pedagogy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Workflow; Reading (process); Point (geometry); Face (sociological concept); Product (mathematics); Process (computing); Computer science; Institution; World Wide Web; Library science; Management; Sociology; Political science; Database; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.28022121302283737,"score_gpt":0.35869997513228624,"score_spread":0.07847876210944887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2578942293","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16084798,0.0016497034,0.000108103726,0.35412344,0.012383587,0.0005519883,0.00017400806,0.000022618342,0.47013855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9616718,0.00009263914,0.0002279658,0.0066577895,0.023340594,0.0000026567743,0.000027561133,0.00003073781,0.007948217],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975293,0.00044260602,0.00073804683,0.00022770546,0.0008045854,0.00025773578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991925,0.0012408498,0.0027060718,0.0006934888,0.0032822483,0.00015232628],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007116111,0.00018383586,0.00038286974,0.00015618361,0.002861547,0.1537124,0.0081446115,0.00013394705,0.0019014141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016667582,0.000109427936,0.00015974173,0.0001318001,0.00042148653,0.14578128,0.0016823546,0.0020475294,0.0000063931407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014211796,0.00013596793,0.008841261,0.000027652108,0.00038720772,0.000020612015,0.17779022,0.0000062905547,0.000019803903,0.18303433,0.61930186,0.010292652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006617054,0.00003901366,0.0070559275,0.00023138759,0.00007034804,0.000012329344,0.09308187,0.000008773943,0.000025111665,0.006213477,0.8924651,0.00013493956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009493499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013121846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80082387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021445072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009182103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2579544313","doi":"10.3138/jsp.48.2.116","title":"Publishing as Social Capital: Amplifying Community with Digital Tools","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Social media; Civic engagement; Sociology; Social capital; Promotion (chess); Public relations; Electronic publishing; Focus (optics); Media studies; Service (business); Digital media; The Internet; Political science; World Wide Web; Social science; Business; Computer science; Politics; Marketing","score_opus":0.1378175175018344,"score_gpt":0.3445489413420602,"score_spread":0.2067314238402258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2579544313","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76143754,0.00010012768,0.00017190832,0.032757077,0.00048020246,0.00009328657,0.0000062094655,0.000068798116,0.20488486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960484,0.000031167172,0.00073821633,0.0011195575,0.0013256165,0.0000027281103,0.000009526263,0.00003351272,0.0006912725],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.994972,0.0015371715,0.00056881696,0.00015386539,0.0021793216,0.00058886025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99337727,0.0009629585,0.0017639622,0.0006957498,0.0027809346,0.0004191538],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018283682,0.00020348952,0.00037827648,0.00031521884,0.01589611,0.42083552,0.005745776,0.00031403394,0.00008801472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03270289,0.00018161183,0.00019157412,0.00031395443,0.0003589539,0.33008227,0.0009254,0.008913723,0.000015077168],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030537206,0.00065539096,0.15770799,0.000083290186,0.00061035727,0.00018783417,0.46412057,0.000047378348,0.00019520646,0.061518308,0.01675211,0.2978162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019185486,0.00034023507,0.14006262,0.00049267884,0.00008941278,0.00006777163,0.56039685,0.0000038422163,0.00002871912,0.010228912,0.2858663,0.0005041167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013368417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00240293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29731208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042959192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079989166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587365068","doi":"10.3138/jsp.42.2.262","title":"Ten Rules of Academic Writing","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Writing and Publishing","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic writing; Creative writing; Mathematics education; Sociology; Computer science; Psychology; Visual arts; Art","score_opus":0.03625645613243741,"score_gpt":0.26140881790269704,"score_spread":0.22515236177025963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587365068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9013489,0.0010715112,0.00004648892,0.009553039,0.0020667752,0.000052902185,0.000027350517,0.000045828998,0.08578723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98678166,0.000053341282,0.0022198758,0.00077746785,0.009159338,0.0000010323132,0.000005533245,0.000034097382,0.00096764823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968416,0.0001131416,0.0013791069,0.00017162455,0.001111386,0.00038311552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947991,0.0005693944,0.0016535665,0.00020332429,0.0025230038,0.00025160375],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008729511,0.00017559815,0.00040741352,0.00063672254,0.00039081278,0.018665595,0.0015655485,0.00040124299,0.0005432345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012158134,0.00014497171,0.00022406832,0.00011130797,0.00022600507,0.1012242,0.00018210078,0.009371,0.000009291956],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058278365,0.00009327441,0.048013493,0.00015962646,0.00015298092,0.00003605701,0.03821025,0.000008891975,0.0261882,0.7252965,0.10128715,0.06049532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014754152,0.00018031384,0.011616035,0.0011052586,0.0001497969,0.00043780092,0.03333015,0.000083662315,0.0013143515,0.04937394,0.9003628,0.00057048484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014663959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024277206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79907566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035761193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024144306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592422958","doi":"10.3138/jsp.48.3.137","title":"The Rewards of Predatory Publications at a Small Business School","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia; Thompson Rivers University","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Incentive; Compensation (psychology); Public relations; Marketing; Sociology; Business; Political science; Advertising; Psychology; Economics; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.6179006571062694,"score_gpt":0.5339360884481533,"score_spread":0.08396456865811608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592422958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8978648,0.0032630768,0.0019562594,0.06385383,0.0021517365,0.00018861244,0.000036392146,0.000010892958,0.030674407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848595,0.0006429548,0.0022750401,0.0001589592,0.000410482,0.0000037426541,9.268281e-7,0.0000143668185,0.011634012],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98333156,0.0003999729,0.0017825812,0.00037632117,0.013577313,0.00053226674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91237,0.005867915,0.0053061494,0.0028267605,0.07260005,0.0010291009],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.111765854,0.00013029276,0.00037020168,0.025336925,0.002559039,0.28168792,0.016475765,0.00021626899,0.0002574519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.71831036,0.00007167824,0.00027334926,0.045192726,0.00039068758,0.09930483,0.0029943464,0.0016293433,0.000053992473],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059739592,0.00010597111,0.7147208,0.0000071063955,0.000059117996,0.000010049147,0.00010034962,0.000015906413,0.001932855,0.0026098227,0.18858956,0.09178872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039309877,0.00005003033,0.7050924,0.000025493366,0.000007798887,0.000045676534,0.0002528399,0.000084302264,0.00023486852,0.0057574585,0.28798681,0.00006922274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013015744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009646546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6065445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003289105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016567516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593644284","doi":"10.3138/jsp.48.3.161","title":"Evaluating Manuscripts for Copy-Editing: The View from a Managing Editor","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punctuation; CLARITY; Computer science; Spelling; Consistency (knowledge bases); Collaborative editing; Grammar; Key (lock); World Wide Web; Quality (philosophy); Proofreading; Information retrieval; Order (exchange); Linguistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.20610776429986125,"score_gpt":0.3513094156856192,"score_spread":0.14520165138575794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593644284","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36871997,0.013942094,0.0029950254,0.41167948,0.08505199,0.0012532372,0.00024538228,0.00022180472,0.115891024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9314021,0.000098225355,0.0058831945,0.002228556,0.05815267,0.000027727378,0.000033135584,0.000056341185,0.0021180906],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967879,0.00037216072,0.0009479662,0.00024163804,0.0012667023,0.0003835986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99124825,0.000985542,0.002664018,0.0011767368,0.003748717,0.00017674144],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014638578,0.0002119582,0.0003736643,0.0002267585,0.005404562,0.2896648,0.0050520017,0.0001380882,0.00014982672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027307717,0.0001472299,0.0002848903,0.000044446635,0.00020549097,0.17280877,0.0004974592,0.0026106194,0.000009533038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015173481,0.00014392752,0.004153355,0.00007124427,0.00046580317,0.0000132158575,0.033029657,0.000028126227,0.0006248574,0.07991567,0.7119451,0.16945732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012375,0.00016392523,0.003805304,0.0005956694,0.00017926304,0.000012278383,0.007623977,0.0007544907,0.000037690603,0.04318994,0.94217366,0.00022630683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007988655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034722313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5626821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015453006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020421634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593717763","doi":"10.3138/jsp.48.3.190","title":"The Art of No","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Operations research; Sociology; History; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.053843443652787544,"score_gpt":0.32706221368037364,"score_spread":0.2732187700275861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593717763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35115615,0.0002211047,0.00006525124,0.1485055,0.0026010075,0.00006311347,0.0000015600882,0.0000071909503,0.49737912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99139,0.00013206169,0.00060553674,0.00024065917,0.0010084016,1.9425318e-7,1.5858161e-7,0.000002235345,0.006620755],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848866,0.000105644525,0.00029314432,0.00005315185,0.0009120693,0.00014732202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997599,0.00016760807,0.00095638976,0.00019376256,0.0009592702,0.00012397108],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007044649,0.0000349562,0.00008165832,0.000049882063,0.0020168535,0.05388096,0.0018112665,0.000063617634,0.000049540573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016588632,0.000021914306,0.000073958174,0.00009197921,0.00029670424,0.17522584,0.00006380471,0.0004481905,0.000013270335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078233956,0.00009548187,0.2585364,0.0000098991695,0.000056654793,0.00004024653,0.010074754,0.0000041882968,0.004303547,0.30557328,0.3512561,0.069971226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015601293,0.00007720303,0.07158399,0.000045042936,0.0000058111564,0.000005019079,0.0032693448,0.0000047173994,0.00024672417,0.010614258,0.91394573,0.000046136425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010997072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011967048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6402339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022920362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000645875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99928236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593808830","doi":"10.3138/jsp.48.3.168","title":"Promising but Uncertain Work: Inventing and Reinventing the Research Exchange Index (REx)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rigour; Publishing; Rhetoric; Index (typography); Library science; Sustainability; Work (physics); Sociology; Publication; Scholarly communication; World Wide Web; Media studies; Computer science; Political science; Engineering; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.2862173388745284,"score_gpt":0.35109432907603544,"score_spread":0.06487699020150706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593808830","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8890597,0.004245022,0.00003723858,0.047244363,0.0010123627,0.00019163113,0.0000032741953,0.00003356438,0.058172803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99276364,0.00015902173,0.0005035064,0.00037462555,0.002557672,0.000006820667,0.0000027642304,0.000034047098,0.0035979182],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99574083,0.0010105649,0.0008220327,0.00025487496,0.001598331,0.00057338574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99266994,0.0007715283,0.0016607335,0.0010234952,0.00365027,0.00022400862],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.038400445,0.00017889858,0.00029622347,0.0006086339,0.008358987,0.31032398,0.0036481726,0.00017535039,0.00009756441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031408496,0.00012615194,0.00014120192,0.00016438868,0.0005998145,0.14245775,0.0013942006,0.0060384,0.0000047484655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027388457,0.00026672575,0.26588494,0.00027918475,0.00046896533,0.00015209381,0.15823784,0.000024981224,0.0009150255,0.14063334,0.087275125,0.34558788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024888036,0.00023625891,0.1108003,0.002999237,0.000102095706,0.00019015036,0.060371716,0.0007244651,0.00009683351,0.048710443,0.77258897,0.00069073366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012603105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038756465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6853138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016972338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023689239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2726383735","doi":"10.3138/jsp.48.4.268","title":"Vladimir Vladimirovich Nabokov and Jason Epstein: A Study in Authorial Extravagance and Editorial Restraint","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Vladimir Nabokov Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biography; Publishing; Work (physics); Sociology; Art history; History; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.045009208971503095,"score_gpt":0.3461168379904152,"score_spread":0.3011076290189121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2726383735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95109844,0.0015488912,0.000008034505,0.015010455,0.027620574,0.00045444327,0.000006650696,0.000024320292,0.004228192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95891225,0.00030815756,0.0007337653,0.00009764112,0.039684575,0.000007813138,3.693166e-7,0.000022775344,0.00023264586],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955062,0.00076166773,0.0009076687,0.00042583825,0.0018133152,0.00058530393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962694,0.0005002011,0.0011871419,0.00038745886,0.0011877203,0.0004680489],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0136709185,0.00023921418,0.0005933973,0.00047897734,0.0021078393,0.045155067,0.0013302941,0.0003738033,0.000009742689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027092885,0.00022861671,0.00007965237,0.00027719408,0.0004694269,0.076748796,0.0004287155,0.002385939,0.0000010781183],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067999144,0.00046634965,0.7766556,0.00004746679,0.00020243981,0.00057869253,0.1482434,0.0000034377338,0.000419665,0.0071660616,0.025200853,0.040336024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046520527,0.00066613354,0.7735363,0.00029761984,0.00005417773,0.0000357017,0.026236814,0.0000060994344,0.000008322678,0.0034988269,0.1906423,0.00036563797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025027453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041933106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16544144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000201705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055064633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2730132155","doi":"10.3138/jsp.48.4.243","title":"Speaking of Editing: The Nomenclature of Copy-Editing","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terminology; Publishing; Nomenclature; Publication; Subject (documents); Typography; Computer science; World Wide Web; Scientific writing; Library science; Linguistics; Taxonomy (biology); Visual arts; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07309126107455693,"score_gpt":0.27575491080788117,"score_spread":0.20266364973332424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2730132155","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7939762,0.002236802,0.0001437824,0.03033141,0.0040323455,0.00013366758,0.000037693026,0.000025364114,0.16908278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941655,0.000043343953,0.001024349,0.00022038778,0.004147453,0.0000011130385,0.0000047754775,0.000021789154,0.00037130175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969963,0.00025716258,0.0011521049,0.00013701127,0.0011931102,0.0002643068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891464,0.000451081,0.005162506,0.00096353353,0.004165651,0.0001108298],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009953348,0.00015934024,0.00041746726,0.00033646286,0.0016969164,0.061571382,0.004263225,0.00015556919,0.00013799492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02000525,0.00010814875,0.0002635436,0.000082968036,0.00040491085,0.12866345,0.0005087277,0.0031727515,0.0000015536817],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015832706,0.0004374652,0.10989626,0.00031439506,0.00077645597,0.00003539961,0.18116942,0.00006307598,0.006552531,0.5302578,0.10219077,0.06814809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027792975,0.0005359393,0.07846971,0.0032940588,0.000370714,0.00014603177,0.08448344,0.00022100123,0.002433449,0.03437989,0.7922942,0.00059224013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061441516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028502688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6901035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007148652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018544546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2730967626","doi":"10.3138/jsp.48.4.221","title":"Open Access Strategy for a ‘New’ University Press: A View through the Stakeholder Lens","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Private Equity and Venture Capital","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Stakeholder; Public relations; Business model; Sustainability; Independence (probability theory); Quality (philosophy); Business; Sociology; Political science; Marketing; Law","score_opus":0.33580288836941924,"score_gpt":0.3510018139238947,"score_spread":0.01519892555447544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2730967626","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21047315,0.0036846302,0.021799916,0.33672678,0.0062107067,0.0026689605,0.000063487874,0.00011350938,0.41825885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98547703,0.00022369673,0.0007381912,0.0050333976,0.005357321,0.0000020597352,0.0000087278,0.000033229957,0.0031263407],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863607,0.000027356653,0.00035036053,0.00020182005,0.00048325953,0.00030110794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99654466,0.00009163346,0.0016283469,0.0005116648,0.0011898573,0.00003382922],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025469195,0.00015373595,0.00027983476,0.00010822206,0.0014458626,0.2602878,0.009810843,0.0001273355,0.00007304717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032135402,0.000108160064,0.00017530944,0.000152726,0.00006889616,0.49838498,0.0034258906,0.000962968,0.0000045691418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003458263,0.00014955606,0.0048264246,0.00016229508,0.00027788995,0.000075209144,0.00028974106,0.00009106405,0.00011486576,0.3457189,0.6262382,0.021710003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017268485,0.000027176982,0.014088412,0.00018453809,0.0001376148,0.000011604583,0.000789105,0.00004329682,0.00002045239,0.020898642,0.96191067,0.00016164639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015988252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015819001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7750039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000069796486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023320422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2731953178","doi":"10.3138/jsp.48.4.199","title":"Strategies for Publishing in the Humanities: A Senior Professor Advises Junior Scholars","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"University Challenges and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Promotion (chess); Sociology; Focus (optics); Political science; Media studies; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.105785889608711,"score_gpt":0.3439884194574233,"score_spread":0.23820252984871232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2731953178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66515297,0.000923682,0.00023159951,0.20422892,0.0021323226,0.00067569973,0.000021655806,0.00003708131,0.12659606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932835,0.00029487917,0.0010876441,0.0011234888,0.0019231226,0.0000060899742,0.0000024102674,0.000017838469,0.002261044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99702656,0.00035699256,0.00050758146,0.00018874127,0.0013831379,0.00053698977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958689,0.00042340704,0.0012175115,0.00037940775,0.001980301,0.0001304546],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014602472,0.00015218451,0.0002977032,0.00046861902,0.0053523206,0.24953564,0.0043799495,0.00034406738,0.00002527955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010523843,0.00009804745,0.00023805353,0.00021546363,0.00039282802,0.32992423,0.00021886945,0.0024974833,0.0000012683965],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021929054,0.0003503787,0.0121550625,0.00014581889,0.00018770513,0.00018810414,0.3564728,0.000018343299,0.00017741778,0.56609213,0.033100445,0.030892543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010830917,0.000105718886,0.011924334,0.0002328675,0.00003126966,0.000012707514,0.5190236,0.00000486695,0.0000047563153,0.01662995,0.45080057,0.00014626612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021875862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01002173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54946214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028897243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014156648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W273448506","doi":"","title":"Copyright Questions and Answers for Information Professionals: From the Columns of Against the Grain by Laura N. Gasaway (review)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Questions and answers; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.015628828798592283,"score_gpt":0.22688985594584765,"score_spread":0.21126102714725536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W273448506","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25487578,0.06281316,0.024826992,0.55546623,0.005743505,0.003790207,0.0001888149,0.00012953601,0.09216579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9518671,0.0014018205,0.0005876857,0.04410432,0.0015963227,0.00002248842,0.00009227582,0.000021066046,0.00030690804],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998484,0.000078681056,0.0006815661,0.0000863097,0.000512087,0.00015735882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99620795,0.00060375774,0.001026862,0.00017359472,0.0019635758,0.000024241197],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004845412,0.00011880601,0.00023505231,0.0001185354,0.00049140246,0.0071474,0.00066959066,0.00007971682,0.00013914265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010264011,0.00005577201,0.00011626567,0.00033690647,0.00008074522,0.05620587,0.00012539842,0.00068573916,0.000006256141],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003345421,0.000026178715,0.0007445934,0.00011609641,0.00003819231,9.201466e-8,0.00022694883,0.0000011999008,0.000298811,0.0015418899,0.97684056,0.020131968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053939916,0.000031007134,0.0025907792,0.0011792802,0.00009113954,0.0000019879637,0.0008752582,0.003423138,0.000043350516,0.0025848688,0.9885372,0.000102621765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024169387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000048675058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6969913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026315036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000061311024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2747139175","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.1.26","title":"Open Publication, Digital Abundance, and Scarce Labour","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Publishing; Redistribution (election); Process (computing); Set (abstract data type); Sociology; World Wide Web; Data science; Economics; Computer science; Political science; Economic growth; Law","score_opus":0.07946204133224566,"score_gpt":0.27352050488146984,"score_spread":0.19405846354922418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2747139175","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3750546,0.00044967656,0.0000103219445,0.015855357,0.0007910282,0.00010850826,0.000074867596,0.000019066225,0.6076366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94428915,0.000029930121,0.00016122236,0.0012801862,0.0015223038,0.0000025306736,0.00000802956,0.000024549105,0.0526821],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982655,0.00003089533,0.00059042865,0.00020170974,0.00063481665,0.0002766336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99477214,0.0000782264,0.0011671608,0.00047017125,0.003235696,0.00027662693],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021991918,0.00015933102,0.0002935561,0.00024122665,0.0020179267,0.68961936,0.003734816,0.00007787638,0.0005830227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054603433,0.00013051249,0.00009733039,0.00003253282,0.0003247701,0.4705118,0.0011390772,0.0010252149,0.000021283118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043018696,0.00008111413,0.014482107,0.000023412811,0.000077290715,0.000025480957,0.005106639,1.4494721e-7,0.000011426774,0.88791615,0.05069546,0.041537754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071205274,0.000110483175,0.025382647,0.00012471684,0.000015152986,0.00007221103,0.0036250737,0.0000017536361,0.000007388017,0.04486211,0.9249064,0.00018002822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016307525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015425809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8742109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057486173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015516057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992813},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2765543183","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.1.53","title":"The Open Textbook Toolkit: Seeding Successful Partnerships for Collaboration between Academic Libraries and University Presses","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Open Education and E-Learning","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Viewpoints; Academic library; Scholarly communication; Library science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Sociology; Open educational resources; Knowledge management; Engineering management; Political science; Engineering; Publishing","score_opus":0.09797314540678795,"score_gpt":0.32580194272139723,"score_spread":0.22782879731460928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765543183","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3392538,0.0019355916,0.04133087,0.5669639,0.0028592912,0.0010229432,0.000012783618,0.00008507743,0.04653573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876254,0.00016706304,0.009768414,0.00017431045,0.00052874675,0.0000013451778,0.0000017351146,0.000007284679,0.0017256633],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882716,0.00016672304,0.0002904351,0.00017336408,0.00034405765,0.00019828138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99681747,0.0006630892,0.0010537176,0.00026867996,0.0010200373,0.0001769883],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004649072,0.000085808904,0.0001628719,0.00011707827,0.003188878,0.1995797,0.0051622745,0.000119026445,0.0000033006077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074602566,0.00006660686,0.00003530772,0.00017374047,0.00008104891,0.273939,0.0012331939,0.0010791378,9.339905e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009587141,0.000020704785,0.479059,0.00003498592,0.0001155674,0.000006095529,0.007188333,0.000024367799,0.00037762476,0.39893538,0.05387903,0.06026303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093109696,0.000122109,0.16346422,0.0001627747,0.00003711855,0.000016096972,0.017312821,0.00039178025,0.00029980036,0.011633091,0.805446,0.00018304828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022917291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014342897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.751567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000064393294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058638974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99810886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765699166","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.1.89","title":"Gold Open Access Publishing in Mega-Journals: Developing Countries Pay the Price of Western Premium Academic Output","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam","keywords":"Publishing; Subsidy; Business; Developing country; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Law","score_opus":0.7472106280624337,"score_gpt":0.6125763640191498,"score_spread":0.13463426404328382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765699166","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7435307,0.0044590347,0.003794314,0.2331868,0.002943696,0.0005520191,0.000032212276,0.000010094891,0.011491119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99090236,0.002825562,0.0016490961,0.0017507222,0.00074505416,0.0000062687827,8.4102675e-7,0.000028572229,0.0020915477],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97047853,0.0012204108,0.0042885463,0.0007765185,0.022052795,0.0011832173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9415068,0.011779809,0.011428138,0.0021426273,0.03225203,0.0008905908],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2531886,0.0002915358,0.0010246066,0.04074986,0.0012253236,0.72767806,0.07085458,0.0005520071,0.000108648725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5364203,0.0001388198,0.0002715572,0.05015579,0.00034023664,0.55487907,0.016894085,0.00751677,0.000010355862],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077980054,0.000045070552,0.87554574,0.000016515785,0.000049699585,0.000049358812,0.00083778036,0.000047539477,0.00012560157,0.00072860223,0.03889532,0.08358077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011529608,0.00006322523,0.8086415,0.00052610313,0.00001376966,0.000119729186,0.0012371704,0.00013875589,0.00042103123,0.013644599,0.1738266,0.000214547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008408397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018120024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28323165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006511374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031780442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765903993","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.1.123","title":"Assessing the Openness of Anthropology Journals","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Colorado Boulder","keywords":"Publishing; Transparency (behavior); Openness to experience; Publication; Scholarly communication; Sociology; Library science; Computer science; Political science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.3470265417141542,"score_gpt":0.5270761187654349,"score_spread":0.18004957705128072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765903993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8140702,0.00076076743,0.06003405,0.10754897,0.0019691018,0.00008068366,0.0000049397995,0.0000054555107,0.015525799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965584,0.000046811652,0.0020475911,0.00033877546,0.00066592044,8.6437075e-7,1.1964849e-7,0.00000713014,0.000334355],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959642,0.00049771054,0.0014012578,0.00016709541,0.0017846739,0.00018505458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98663336,0.0017886593,0.0057545193,0.00097125943,0.0047003836,0.00015183845],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.037586927,0.00008971271,0.00035289282,0.0003686731,0.0021954642,0.10175372,0.0056404425,0.00013003341,0.0007030923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07288624,0.000048307324,0.00021841792,0.00039344313,0.000575776,0.15036426,0.00043614558,0.0014402615,0.000016123484],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008795993,0.00031468898,0.18826497,0.000008581879,0.00022452229,0.00005776151,0.0037147333,0.00040393032,0.02863437,0.17591904,0.05278094,0.5495885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070677645,0.00007963975,0.43638244,0.0001382069,0.000054329004,0.00083320617,0.022630164,0.00008749465,0.0040654624,0.4518845,0.08299237,0.00014541527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025647394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000060679627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54944307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034034103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026228378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766307773","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.1.103","title":"Adoption of Open Access Publishing by Academic Researchers in Kenya","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kenya; Publication; Publishing; Accreditation; Public relations; Political science; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.8470049518652517,"score_gpt":0.6541268974003143,"score_spread":0.19287805446493744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766307773","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92618865,0.0026108955,0.0008505679,0.046234842,0.0010458985,0.00028733216,0.000038247632,0.000005141583,0.022738425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99578977,0.0010159513,0.001403256,0.00027862255,0.00026222426,0.0000030808533,0.000003399222,0.000017982826,0.0012257277],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96983325,0.0011448684,0.0029812409,0.0007410844,0.024289979,0.0010095681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9612819,0.005733419,0.0056969416,0.0017094138,0.02436869,0.0012096204],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2582119,0.0001739572,0.0006895277,0.06405682,0.00069325423,0.7067832,0.06237862,0.00054691895,0.00025015243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6856884,0.00012732774,0.00021307374,0.066855304,0.00028174088,0.6578752,0.014110327,0.0067785447,0.000014128659],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096629985,0.00009074148,0.6593459,0.0000066951015,0.000017254211,0.000027722464,0.00016965019,0.000025410143,0.002556104,0.0006106328,0.17760555,0.15944767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020258692,0.00017358708,0.902085,0.00021431061,0.000006524985,0.00002813682,0.0015233743,0.00046979586,0.0010005307,0.027408866,0.06486577,0.0001982055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017649186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008102825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42747647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005320711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014581343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99551284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766363682","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.1.66","title":"Evaluating and Promoting Open Data Practices in Open Access Journals","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directory; Scholarly communication; Citation; Open data; Data sharing; Incentive; Open science; Computer science; Data access; Data science; World Wide Web; Business; Political science; Publishing; Medicine; Database","score_opus":0.8265358079998114,"score_gpt":0.6426917435008372,"score_spread":0.18384406449897417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766363682","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4493245,0.0036907375,0.025529563,0.46696708,0.001567821,0.0022673556,0.000022648257,0.00003183809,0.050598484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6962835,0.0023997896,0.29903677,0.0011699974,0.0006182748,0.000012370453,0.0000063973966,0.000030597566,0.00044229033],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936638,0.001420403,0.0012016651,0.0008437377,0.002359714,0.0005106999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98027885,0.0014530432,0.011662192,0.0043293647,0.0018651681,0.0004113919],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13979344,0.00016412642,0.00041954173,0.0007587454,0.0013287866,0.9319236,0.14772896,0.00009163256,0.000022530514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31693116,0.00013635366,0.000026545982,0.00058195763,0.000059403304,0.980358,0.18247744,0.0029767356,0.0000020074679],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013658719,0.00033285943,0.38457733,0.00013028657,0.00024301025,0.0009460113,0.0011820432,0.00003460334,0.0017555946,0.013146913,0.00900042,0.5885143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0057494333,0.00049152476,0.84895015,0.0031444624,0.000090699614,0.0008939551,0.0014599079,0.041851208,0.0002065552,0.024658673,0.07184941,0.00065401423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021001562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039517425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58786035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011687829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010361179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997133},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":"reproducibility","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":"reproducibility","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2766606724","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.1.41","title":"Opening the Monograph: Lessons from Luminos","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Digital Rights Management and Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distribution (mathematics); Launched; Space (punctuation); Computer science; Engineering management; Library science; Engineering","score_opus":0.06516164886200314,"score_gpt":0.29130051790427414,"score_spread":0.22613886904227098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766606724","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.608317,0.0012838239,0.063287966,0.15698643,0.0041164835,0.00020439175,0.0000065379654,0.0000744797,0.16572285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911912,0.000029628778,0.0074162586,0.0004527296,0.00043823957,9.324467e-7,5.3363794e-7,0.000006720506,0.0004637773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815124,0.00008559584,0.0004096127,0.00020004233,0.0009063986,0.0002470944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970756,0.00016852873,0.0010280233,0.000998166,0.00057010114,0.00015958563],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029482343,0.00011812728,0.00019227738,0.00019515397,0.0011413476,0.25405777,0.009225608,0.00007316638,0.000011386039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020730696,0.0000707077,0.00018548049,0.00017031794,0.000081304126,0.2609374,0.0014163466,0.0011361351,0.000010460271],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034645884,0.0001941689,0.057578497,0.000010677464,0.00043106338,0.0005865251,0.0051442557,0.000027128446,0.0005670354,0.48695657,0.059355702,0.38911372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013342957,0.00012095144,0.3738345,0.00024370133,0.00006125953,0.000068250505,0.00048200626,0.002722439,0.00050167955,0.27733985,0.34288526,0.00040580574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016579068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024508843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3887079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031156753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008198298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99613494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766654013","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.1.1","title":"Special Issue on Open Access","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Open access publishing; Computer science; Library science; World Wide Web; Data science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.8042926188935705,"score_gpt":0.6550944232339806,"score_spread":0.14919819565958992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766654013","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24801387,0.0001680814,0.0002071252,0.07089503,0.01100061,0.00020530091,0.000017609784,0.0000057059356,0.66948664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9265463,0.00023235322,0.0021469505,0.0026339795,0.044042103,0.0000022905285,8.962724e-7,0.000027780408,0.024367357],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97956955,0.00032522762,0.0012591992,0.00048439146,0.017831856,0.0005297556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9734055,0.0029155905,0.0030407333,0.0017120569,0.0179602,0.0009659482],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.107124485,0.00014429403,0.0004828775,0.044895798,0.0015841419,0.86547035,0.058974642,0.00020374231,0.0034807986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.51866484,0.000091570866,0.00023335667,0.034890354,0.00013462697,0.43385234,0.010578511,0.0023504833,0.00035581933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005450159,0.000073493306,0.10234792,7.531566e-7,0.000012893989,0.00007777981,0.000068738955,0.00000494024,0.00004033269,0.00077984005,0.55864555,0.33789328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006583699,0.00016724547,0.32755664,0.000027153366,0.0000035053283,0.000028905786,0.00015410654,0.00003664736,0.00018629136,0.014446457,0.65664405,0.00009066403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001952618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026018703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6785324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002243904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072038424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766932290","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.1.5","title":"Traditional versus Open Access Scholarly Journal Publishing: An Economic Perspective","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Misinformation; Electronic publishing; Scholarly communication; Perspective (graphical); Open access publishing; Public relations; Business; Computer science; Political science; World Wide Web; The Internet; Law","score_opus":0.8658095751057954,"score_gpt":0.6303082985146546,"score_spread":0.23550127659114073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766932290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72448945,0.0014559218,0.0016463716,0.10656251,0.015171819,0.00034370154,0.00015675106,0.000020223824,0.15015328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98833615,0.00028795341,0.004801818,0.00071664277,0.0048119547,0.0000037220946,0.000005366537,0.000041975567,0.0009943914],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9758969,0.0011473504,0.0025036442,0.001025041,0.018329203,0.0010978502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91402906,0.006315053,0.009006974,0.0027882613,0.06374548,0.0041151536],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1650671,0.00034843606,0.0008807163,0.05186339,0.004778166,0.9670092,0.076787025,0.00053375016,0.0023121403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.52051526,0.00026000585,0.0005895458,0.01954708,0.00038430543,0.8922455,0.008726421,0.008395823,0.00009304696],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014729294,0.0007944292,0.23279968,0.000004500322,0.00046294605,0.000618578,0.0011203303,0.00025096408,0.00039666027,0.08729751,0.5100968,0.16468467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0076963706,0.0012969048,0.5992395,0.00007369957,0.000051031257,0.0010628721,0.0070621935,0.0006764107,0.00012834236,0.27428055,0.10787681,0.0005553115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009909322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017492325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40221998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025866453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057737366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999852},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2781582566","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.2.231","title":"The New World of Republishing in Open Access: A View from the Author's Side","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nuts and bolts; Work (physics); Sociology; Media studies; Computer science; World Wide Web; History; Public relations; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.16881024027498304,"score_gpt":0.35863472765288223,"score_spread":0.1898244873778992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781582566","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22612232,0.016975228,0.00020773604,0.44630668,0.005853503,0.0006935207,0.00004266459,0.000065780005,0.30373254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840294,0.00021427312,0.0011107627,0.0037767878,0.0045295707,0.000007293682,0.000012140508,0.00004009206,0.0062796576],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951995,0.0011170898,0.0017309366,0.00026625136,0.0012710706,0.00041517656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900149,0.0027318173,0.0024150703,0.0013138516,0.0032886672,0.00023566082],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.020625941,0.00021392372,0.0004635732,0.00048421326,0.0014822232,0.42687127,0.016081689,0.00012645088,0.00033272215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026290217,0.000121644334,0.00019006988,0.0008374377,0.00035634567,0.33472353,0.0027509767,0.0038317991,0.000007558575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018477571,0.000110759065,0.016898263,0.000008625364,0.0001825673,0.000007845399,0.040590804,0.000006819689,0.00012615041,0.20096578,0.66828835,0.07262926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073361903,0.000079785525,0.02808467,0.00064989424,0.000045233264,0.000008112274,0.0071914014,0.000034979133,0.000048901267,0.05982956,0.9031354,0.00015840607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01674243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054424785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7579071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020195801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010240497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781612975","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.2.193","title":"The Social Text and Networked Knowledge: New Modes of Scholarly Book Publishing in Indigenous Studies","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Indigenous; Scholarly communication; Context (archaeology); Cultural heritage; Library science; Sociology; Resource (disambiguation); Media studies; Public relations; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.09618853880300665,"score_gpt":0.29625408504605927,"score_spread":0.20006554624305262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781612975","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.803214,0.07383142,0.000012679394,0.008957555,0.001921253,0.00025074487,0.00001697425,0.000038617614,0.11175676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980462,0.0007214324,0.00011318545,0.00090513827,0.006506817,0.0000034531276,0.0000025137626,0.000044320514,0.011241144],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963927,0.00030411116,0.0013675484,0.00026509666,0.0010346035,0.00063588866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99284565,0.00072980917,0.0011546005,0.00024081263,0.004785651,0.00024347803],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007138149,0.00029543135,0.000619105,0.0006398692,0.0021052044,0.18693139,0.0015598268,0.0002187639,0.00009430729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058811055,0.00020777083,0.00020382922,0.00028096308,0.00088257814,0.2619182,0.00051133335,0.002916836,0.0000054461725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037441246,0.00020682366,0.004739309,0.00010716836,0.00057162996,0.00003511397,0.3864574,0.00000553358,0.000093472205,0.28968605,0.17468132,0.14304173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019138135,0.0006577207,0.0052308305,0.00074342755,0.000096331794,0.00005037939,0.11941979,0.000020419879,0.000048387526,0.05471056,0.81668264,0.00042570144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032018032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034319756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64200133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024022457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056742935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99938345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781874152","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.2.248","title":"The Scholarly Publishing Community Should Support Changes to US Copyright Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Copyright law; Electronic publishing; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Intellectual property; Sociology; The Internet; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.0945945138737045,"score_gpt":0.2741952177286532,"score_spread":0.1796007038549487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781874152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22871318,0.00065830554,0.0005619951,0.1775411,0.006497912,0.00046328106,0.000008867275,0.00020472649,0.58535063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9231197,0.000030146946,0.0003806509,0.06377619,0.0107636945,0.000007690408,0.000012569976,0.00007553721,0.001833802],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99517214,0.00025417202,0.0011283577,0.0003366787,0.0021971527,0.00091152434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98499036,0.000572314,0.001177769,0.0008988946,0.0121529605,0.00020772166],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018681869,0.00040553435,0.0005185602,0.00093923806,0.004364534,0.40808195,0.0051250793,0.00039610002,0.0017250708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028051017,0.00025025278,0.00025820648,0.0019041917,0.0003202063,0.42401248,0.0017526636,0.006870693,0.00041913032],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003280566,0.00013507041,0.0025622013,0.00004443678,0.0001390646,0.000026818983,0.0011508138,0.0000013449262,0.0025559133,0.01240523,0.9600825,0.020568592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073050335,0.00028370667,0.0027963857,0.00020198466,0.00008178051,0.000055139255,0.001580933,0.00017619127,0.0010737613,0.007748073,0.9848961,0.0003754036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004692678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066026086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6944065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026575825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020699484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782033416","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.2.213","title":"Old Traditions and New Technologies: Creating Concordia University Press","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Face (sociological concept); Scholarly communication; Work (physics); Dual (grammatical number); Library science; Sociology; World Wide Web; Computer science; Engineering; Political science; Art; Social science; Law; Literature","score_opus":0.07628625455330139,"score_gpt":0.2393859989114348,"score_spread":0.1630997443581334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782033416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67957443,0.001965541,0.0007914881,0.043367002,0.0012794981,0.0001434565,0.00004166102,0.00031239644,0.27252454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98869145,0.00020862248,0.0026488856,0.00028127508,0.0012172185,2.9940992e-7,0.0000050392723,0.000014630874,0.0069326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987114,0.00014664217,0.00038223318,0.00014995987,0.00040061903,0.00020913186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99709994,0.0002854742,0.00056249055,0.00031164364,0.0015688452,0.00017161193],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018505125,0.00012118754,0.00021165037,0.00040340816,0.0010366803,0.051011864,0.0011767442,0.0001493922,0.00007949148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035003792,0.00011028257,0.000081773615,0.00014545642,0.00032312694,0.1287802,0.00016859506,0.0017226422,0.0000022963857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006838726,0.00009287302,0.005189748,0.000018389585,0.00015835199,0.00002240648,0.04049679,0.0000017854031,0.00040743142,0.72527057,0.19723311,0.031040167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007241854,0.00022949885,0.0033197359,0.00014592652,0.00006273283,0.000058540256,0.025136324,0.00004842991,0.00006779062,0.005912647,0.964132,0.00016219894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011648217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033058543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7668989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012613757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018943442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9499733},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2782047141","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.2.145","title":"Special Section on the Future University Press in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Context (archaeology); Special section; Publishing; Library science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Art; History; Literature; Archaeology; Engineering; Engineering physics","score_opus":0.32807171846348404,"score_gpt":0.42329114030668996,"score_spread":0.09521942184320592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782047141","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91331935,0.00011654626,0.00011125612,0.02444896,0.010294075,0.000065908,0.000009240834,0.0000019121283,0.051632755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97815317,0.0000789129,0.0001259877,0.00057351927,0.019614002,8.016791e-8,1.8061053e-7,0.0000043035125,0.0014498594],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98922116,0.00047644856,0.00047489142,0.0002138878,0.009315656,0.0002979659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878004,0.0024971475,0.0005716716,0.00033785947,0.00849707,0.0002958078],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.033829805,0.000071565875,0.00016124759,0.016519416,0.00033172732,0.040093336,0.0034941942,0.00009738323,0.0003297454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05203725,0.000040498275,0.00007542862,0.06218791,0.000054156324,0.034375764,0.0003353534,0.0018278329,0.0000068156774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000799608,0.000029831011,0.11268304,5.3570056e-7,0.000008560331,0.00007064649,0.00013957504,0.000030111756,0.000048409296,0.0023222887,0.83665353,0.047933523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023982229,0.00009142397,0.28285882,0.000008523101,0.0000014096819,0.00001654244,0.003118985,0.000105319545,0.000064907996,0.00039310975,0.7130576,0.000043552784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1401079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36608624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22597834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013267103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020826769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99487555},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2782141341","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.2.153","title":"The Evolution(s) of Wilfrid Laurier University Press: Toward Library–University Press Integration","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Merge (version control); Negotiation; Professionalization; Sociology; General partnership; Media studies; Political science; Library science; Law; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.02078013438839834,"score_gpt":0.2472734765050163,"score_spread":0.22649334211661795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782141341","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46679974,0.0011953454,0.0023987594,0.010754394,0.003521348,0.00036453002,0.000026818258,0.000052100822,0.514887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9475366,0.005369829,0.0016177087,0.000039008617,0.0026990518,3.8365776e-8,0.0000029160935,0.000010847807,0.042724006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997951,0.0006947571,0.00028433933,0.00011530992,0.00069022365,0.00026440577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99657613,0.00023695058,0.000691891,0.00015760421,0.0021325066,0.00020491664],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030116343,0.00007395606,0.0001348322,0.00016883732,0.0049489546,0.0034263083,0.0011190712,0.00018415769,0.00003222226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025818968,0.000054220465,0.00009548772,0.00043303048,0.00039284636,0.059675936,0.000013454545,0.00068917806,0.0000014762198],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015845311,0.000097136566,0.0038909453,0.000014008751,0.000055388748,0.0000047803915,0.16950212,0.0000026003695,0.000012206943,0.8048142,0.020560483,0.0008876688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021197106,0.00008491994,0.004596847,0.000055235272,0.000028207935,0.000003029763,0.045424316,0.000008253706,0.000110349974,0.00088192406,0.9485309,0.00006405832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03748675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027011635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9279704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059199694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009296844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99760824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782213038","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.2.260","title":"Article Processing Charges Threaten Academic Libraries: A Librarian's Opinion","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abandonment (legal); Library science; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.08457624222473366,"score_gpt":0.2769142397973928,"score_spread":0.19233799757265918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782213038","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61009234,0.020212833,0.0011350478,0.12055013,0.0058062975,0.00033657998,0.00003134506,0.00049180374,0.24134362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985911,0.00019834137,0.0022112438,0.0016714463,0.008236785,0.000004325284,0.000012465438,0.000047351896,0.0017070152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997114,0.00028670504,0.00097612996,0.00023383353,0.00095628,0.0004330365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953613,0.00019425596,0.0011103959,0.0004161261,0.0026107074,0.0003071736],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042537283,0.0002113015,0.00032973415,0.00062885514,0.0012001749,0.1328882,0.0022817757,0.00026763487,0.0004938418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004486756,0.00017127692,0.00014723252,0.0003408678,0.0003334942,0.37926674,0.00034311105,0.0033997607,0.000045475143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003096631,0.00026421656,0.018435197,0.00009302734,0.00020468772,0.000015648211,0.12103981,0.0000041757908,0.0031448728,0.50378543,0.24456754,0.10813574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001131068,0.0004012381,0.0066611166,0.0007642761,0.000053488617,0.00008787249,0.012304017,0.00034246236,0.0009227055,0.049388647,0.92754483,0.00039830274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000616669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014770956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68297726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009709909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004880798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99889946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782427734","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.2.175","title":"Open Access for Monograph Publishing: Operational Thoughts and Speculations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Mandate; Scholarly communication; Nexus (standard); Normative; Open access publishing; Public relations; Unintended consequences; Political science; Sociology; Public administration; Economics; Business; Library science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.11513640114911695,"score_gpt":0.37997332283557783,"score_spread":0.2648369216864609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782427734","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25390604,0.0029064922,0.0092312675,0.38147408,0.008102997,0.0013919567,0.0001683958,0.00006776275,0.34275103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9407466,0.00039913142,0.02303198,0.0065333475,0.016715987,0.000020643893,0.000024531522,0.000039844024,0.012487944],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984154,0.00014085796,0.00038426276,0.00016229581,0.00066496065,0.0002321893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99597234,0.00017978028,0.00039496558,0.00011566863,0.0029459756,0.00039126334],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005367068,0.00006706368,0.00016584883,0.0010767882,0.0029680112,0.49100003,0.0023140523,0.00015847845,0.00024506543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008867001,0.00007515261,0.000085114996,0.00072996307,0.00036585028,0.35444772,0.0003248466,0.00055553863,0.0000022717538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043432443,0.000049847455,0.011510373,0.000008148076,0.000067115754,0.00000591759,0.010356823,0.0000046534556,0.00006741574,0.2418817,0.7231572,0.012847315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048285216,0.000043501037,0.030185003,0.000037218484,0.000024039355,0.000009193922,0.0015831352,0.000012441596,0.0000059051704,0.023307811,0.9442113,0.000097569115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0474803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3192267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68684053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004201081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020972572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99948174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782442398","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.2.166","title":"Subsidy Landscapes and the Organizational Sociology of Scholarly Publishing","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Publishing; Scholarship; Convergence (economics); Economics; Balance (ability); Field (mathematics); Capital (architecture); Sociology; Political science; Market economy; Economic growth; Law","score_opus":0.016929186483998666,"score_gpt":0.21329442934103415,"score_spread":0.1963652428570355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782442398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81227815,0.0046671624,0.0028235838,0.12305905,0.0018425288,0.00029960097,0.0000061651576,0.000072313436,0.054951433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879138,0.00010796426,0.0009711952,0.005539134,0.0051761195,0.0000013807879,0.000014208092,0.000028494602,0.00024769877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976253,0.00007590749,0.00077893067,0.00020487705,0.001054948,0.00026002486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903949,0.0003402356,0.0013650063,0.00016569602,0.0077034216,0.00003077935],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006156205,0.00017883902,0.00038340254,0.00063325284,0.0007293506,0.054246455,0.001110756,0.0001729351,0.00039114422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021254282,0.00011918481,0.00009423558,0.001127596,0.00045972803,0.20015584,0.000814692,0.0010000982,0.000017214868],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014345544,0.00005223154,0.41866878,0.00007635729,0.00028365353,0.00000552448,0.0010512578,0.000007804159,0.0002482986,0.5178026,0.06063674,0.0010233253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008029667,0.00009447955,0.5144834,0.0002583029,0.0005175045,0.000051438357,0.0085531855,0.00054284383,0.00010747965,0.2679768,0.1988502,0.0005347281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012640339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007149394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24982579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003982852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000080628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9869901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783064550","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.2.br1","title":"<i>The Discourse of Peer Review: Reviewing Submissions to Academic Journals</i> by Brian Paltridge | <i>Getting Published in Academic Journals: Navigating the Publication Process</i> by Brian Paltridge and Sue Starfield","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Peer review; Library science; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06874107232484686,"score_gpt":0.37013890105596264,"score_spread":0.30139782873111576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783064550","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15381731,0.18980321,0.00019583329,0.6511904,0.0010008799,0.00077115395,0.00012383824,0.000044351076,0.0030529976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9208576,0.04958171,0.00043827802,0.022698952,0.004296397,0.00006379542,0.0001073324,0.00012718832,0.0018287448],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887481,0.0015898488,0.0044774045,0.0005327857,0.0036521836,0.00099969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97617644,0.0018257131,0.006072238,0.0010290117,0.014052272,0.0008443469],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07352103,0.00046805205,0.00095934374,0.00057931663,0.0029369765,0.056028012,0.005027803,0.00046535625,0.0001441039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1257903,0.000300726,0.000279825,0.00156388,0.0004618659,0.10591483,0.00058407517,0.015960261,0.00000459238],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005718918,0.00007236507,0.011124083,0.00021584988,0.000086964516,0.0000025425788,0.016862193,0.0000018148448,0.0033689034,0.0013454133,0.91749084,0.049371857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00101135,0.00019688909,0.002825997,0.016459916,0.00018270126,0.00015924475,0.013795147,0.00005722806,0.0004411181,0.0023730483,0.96197,0.0005273689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044712407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020719208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7670403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002757052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071370916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806719022","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.3.03","title":"Chinese Early-Career Researchers' Scholarly Communication Attitudes and Behaviours: Changes Observed in Year Two of a Longitudinal Study","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; China; Publication; Psychology; Social media; Longitudinal study; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.22154923907535481,"score_gpt":0.410863393542979,"score_spread":0.1893141544676242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806719022","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911366,0.0017565889,0.000014510237,0.0020245237,0.00014890802,0.00027294914,0.0000017708023,0.000014468924,0.0046296506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979441,0.0001679913,0.0011284148,0.000028072216,0.00044466808,0.000004506377,0.0000011528323,0.00001466106,0.00026642377],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967011,0.0009116156,0.0005103004,0.00020145808,0.0013376833,0.00033779413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962411,0.00024624777,0.00046144638,0.0003100897,0.0025420056,0.00019910908],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017778097,0.00012369761,0.0003059344,0.0007867899,0.00047654397,0.01936417,0.0014572059,0.00012350347,0.00006121213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007493156,0.00011077354,0.000062422165,0.0011038115,0.00028444847,0.05872921,0.0006124557,0.0014847561,0.000002788828],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006149849,0.00023980036,0.9676985,0.000013240105,0.000052993804,0.000016014856,0.027150866,3.6941674e-7,0.000104560495,0.0010972942,0.00013592668,0.003428906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012300637,0.00032777357,0.98370117,0.00023681702,0.000031494325,0.000001441841,0.01345948,0.0000071640643,0.000009262319,0.00059171295,0.0002990566,0.00010453847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007689711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047364477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039674766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018496062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015199474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989182},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2807123811","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.3.02","title":"Journal Retractions: Some Unique Features of Research Misconduct in China","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institutes of Health; Northwestern University","keywords":"China; Misconduct; Boom; Scientific misconduct; Research data; Political science; Public relations; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Engineering; Library science; Computer science; Medicine; Subject (documents); Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.09045961053599434,"score_gpt":0.40771585992933085,"score_spread":0.3172562493933365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2807123811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8395872,0.0029184183,0.00010660002,0.080217324,0.0025233338,0.00012994911,0.000004698163,0.000011932419,0.07450056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878145,0.0014237976,0.0025539792,0.0004135448,0.006066776,6.2436595e-7,5.5859044e-7,0.000011778,0.0017144397],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935482,0.0023357782,0.0008774643,0.00014104426,0.0025799335,0.0005175682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99250937,0.00089904777,0.00086038234,0.00014436306,0.0052608326,0.0003259975],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06693082,0.00009892168,0.00029028664,0.001495412,0.001031267,0.009858307,0.0015776755,0.001180329,0.0002699699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063157916,0.000082569255,0.00014079541,0.0014288011,0.00062541047,0.082299754,0.000094570845,0.023557188,0.000005669476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004611059,0.00040036367,0.05045576,0.000053452273,0.00018753624,0.00032042933,0.13856232,0.000013480022,0.013989632,0.2692521,0.50021327,0.026090546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013366375,0.0007252249,0.14519134,0.0018917333,0.000035859037,0.0009407221,0.08425781,0.0000078655585,0.0038848317,0.40618652,0.35520327,0.0003381865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038845146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086604443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14822732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005108395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020000616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9911696},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2808055521","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.3.01","title":"Losing Our Modesty: The Content and Communication of Peer Review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Credibility; Object (grammar); Scholarly communication; Metadata; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Public relations; Quality (philosophy); Media studies; World Wide Web; Computer science; Epistemology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.7996148986644458,"score_gpt":0.5840325802009457,"score_spread":0.21558231846350007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808055521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54798037,0.09651129,0.0043461667,0.3427437,0.0007012334,0.00025747725,0.000011586357,0.000005938483,0.007442219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876488,0.005996948,0.0037413852,0.001444718,0.0001713764,6.4163044e-7,5.000333e-7,0.0000059256445,0.0009897208],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98438895,0.0006878579,0.0012742705,0.00018443097,0.013226969,0.00023754791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91291696,0.0031661543,0.0021529582,0.0009733845,0.08042887,0.00036169926],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.15839083,0.00007896511,0.00032904654,0.011061256,0.00034886593,0.049327437,0.003975178,0.000085514424,0.000039120765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.35102448,0.000040010127,0.00013176473,0.03801529,0.00016127535,0.04132789,0.00089365017,0.0011636817,0.00000782197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042576172,0.0001193346,0.12736964,0.00004958915,0.000065982065,0.0000058797673,0.000945027,0.000004221373,0.0026768316,0.0033211105,0.4590863,0.4063135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019070043,0.00097466697,0.47068813,0.0028120982,0.00012189042,0.00054532196,0.012349434,0.002376065,0.0016503173,0.044812858,0.46138662,0.00037558985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000738273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009064766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43966842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000694295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002245183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9869844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808970209","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.3.04","title":"Digital Open Annotation with Hypothesis: Supplying the Missing Capability of the Web","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Annotation; World Wide Web; Computer science; Workflow; Web page; Information retrieval; Database; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04479587827227622,"score_gpt":0.2562373651870188,"score_spread":0.21144148691474257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808970209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92273784,0.00025979077,0.020983098,0.04800116,0.0005992715,0.00019560439,0.0000024312722,0.00001980543,0.007200978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98020494,0.0000032977043,0.019000487,0.00056298665,0.00017521763,0.0000010228697,8.0710464e-8,0.0000055472997,0.000046413945],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825495,0.00018592764,0.00045123676,0.00015949563,0.0007601681,0.00018820196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99663377,0.00053919887,0.0007997016,0.000547222,0.0014169742,0.00006315726],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003495841,0.000095667194,0.00019050397,0.00009373091,0.0004020162,0.041372463,0.0045775753,0.00006042717,0.0000046740256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006012242,0.000043690343,0.000082054255,0.00059111073,0.0002046683,0.082818344,0.00064694666,0.00060001324,0.0000010525337],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017599032,0.00023698152,0.40479013,0.000050595034,0.00023363197,0.000026657703,0.012705678,0.000082830265,0.0093560275,0.01069509,0.009828799,0.5518176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021786792,0.00078758335,0.90316707,0.0011600035,0.00009613346,0.00093859877,0.0076892665,0.004061085,0.013351695,0.04887766,0.017253067,0.000439167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042282965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033114895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5513784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059720816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046688245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9596227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883280698","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.4.08","title":"<i>Social Science Research in India: Status, Issues, and Policies</i> by Sukhadeo Thorat and Samar Verma","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social science; Sociology","score_opus":0.07232950141543634,"score_gpt":0.43024788267575376,"score_spread":0.3579183812603174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883280698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9663595,0.003052383,0.0000071877557,0.018947799,0.00012498337,0.00013863685,0.00000789062,0.000007977407,0.011353632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996679,0.0010126504,0.00028293976,0.00065162854,0.0010040364,0.0000016521163,0.0000018121943,0.000014597022,0.00035169194],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966712,0.00023365118,0.00041149976,0.00023723677,0.001761133,0.00068525015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963448,0.00013693741,0.00013509452,0.00012631775,0.0027276527,0.0005292084],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011310737,0.00010469084,0.00027775244,0.001695829,0.0007428905,0.0132653825,0.00028804175,0.00018351861,0.000024425064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034118174,0.0000839387,0.00003249832,0.00247523,0.0011249866,0.028997151,0.00037583,0.003106123,0.0000033883055],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045920163,0.00026818307,0.61076427,0.000099156,0.000050992592,0.00016838683,0.004513305,7.092238e-8,0.1958833,0.0026571013,0.12832351,0.056812514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025724266,0.0014689371,0.7918124,0.00030424754,0.000018740995,0.0006041507,0.0030746472,0.000029835814,0.0064012115,0.00093588914,0.19261889,0.00015861394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011343332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024616176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1894821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036208107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000721769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883283453","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.4.06","title":"<i>Scholarly Communication at the Crossroads in China</i> by Jingfeng Xia","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Scholarly communication; History; Political science; Archaeology; Law","score_opus":0.038622816438127476,"score_gpt":0.24264866592984508,"score_spread":0.2040258494917176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883283453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7621998,0.0035549442,0.000007954047,0.00880832,0.00083694665,0.00011199615,0.00003914916,0.00002563302,0.22441521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9730806,0.000094223535,0.000076346056,0.0028640667,0.0014082077,0.000004631245,0.00001939572,0.000038959242,0.022413578],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969478,0.00031888575,0.0010030265,0.00020805692,0.0010669811,0.00045519785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963322,0.00026888805,0.000823431,0.00055978884,0.0018423181,0.00017336261],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006192307,0.00023085694,0.00031964877,0.00030965175,0.0017618798,0.1632722,0.0021834509,0.00015005312,0.0013104078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021886057,0.0001618113,0.0001934521,0.00018821882,0.0006380807,0.18996124,0.00048814435,0.0029913483,0.000059267953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003063111,0.00037009272,0.022008745,0.000036165082,0.00015891895,0.000035053192,0.10708705,0.000006767903,0.0014255976,0.16668789,0.6856582,0.016219212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091590313,0.00022183734,0.009297895,0.00022088153,0.000026359674,0.00006196553,0.008324381,0.0000098039945,0.00019016018,0.010171286,0.9703058,0.00025369873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006696044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003356488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28464764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034566235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012142443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883394577","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.4.03","title":"Review Boards for Scientific Publishing","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scientific publishing; Criticism; Public relations; Peer review; Scientific writing; Political science; Scientific progress; Scientific communication; Path (computing); Pipeline (software); Sociology; Computer science; Library science; Law; Epistemology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.6753861425574477,"score_gpt":0.571562453929783,"score_spread":0.10382368862766467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883394577","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18146175,0.30107614,0.096054286,0.31788766,0.037785344,0.0019686283,0.00024385794,0.000112350914,0.06340997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8707649,0.0066345823,0.07415827,0.023132447,0.011496401,0.000026646696,0.000021967233,0.00011205595,0.013652738],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9743257,0.0005266476,0.0025696454,0.00079728285,0.02079539,0.000985337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77746636,0.011396972,0.0048079533,0.0022567988,0.20171115,0.0023607982],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.287699,0.00020036277,0.0006789428,0.06109721,0.0012095346,0.5640057,0.011219035,0.00027956875,0.0005983082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.72280204,0.00013235015,0.0005917305,0.16146706,0.00039372663,0.2953592,0.0012674893,0.0020429234,0.00009911791],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022890032,0.000058767673,0.007836209,0.00004256203,0.000022275864,0.000006420487,0.00009561812,8.1058045e-7,0.0005219721,0.0013587401,0.75598377,0.23404996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006852571,0.00036292916,0.0058855796,0.0005647473,0.000024243076,0.0001009551,0.00030381812,0.00027444874,0.00030945466,0.0224426,0.9688714,0.00017455476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002242742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000013769621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68930316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033168384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015680831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99413073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883553729","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.4.05","title":"A Mixed-Methods Study of the Ex Post Funding Incentive Policy for Scholarly Publications in Turkey","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Turkish; Productivity; Quality (philosophy); Political science; Public relations; Business; Accounting; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.569235225060658,"score_gpt":0.5980257545883764,"score_spread":0.028790529527718323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883553729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9692467,0.00035241965,0.009630237,0.015818253,0.0016321393,0.0006132499,0.000037036938,0.000007623331,0.002662351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98277235,0.000017397566,0.015597364,0.00031516902,0.0006452719,0.000009872844,7.863707e-7,0.00001775463,0.0006240505],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98273706,0.0022413575,0.002516778,0.00060242217,0.011108304,0.0007940442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8708125,0.018270954,0.005045766,0.0021113676,0.10268892,0.0010704985],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.15004483,0.00018946301,0.0005655709,0.08642636,0.0007082945,0.12585263,0.009307895,0.00024123228,0.00007425902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.63923246,0.00011084068,0.00035576263,0.20391865,0.00023652661,0.119018406,0.0020649051,0.002306929,0.000007866665],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001332909,0.0013235118,0.76879114,0.000009104485,0.00010308636,0.0000033769966,0.005418553,0.000038288294,0.009483635,0.0073832767,0.016922537,0.19039018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020201553,0.0011605987,0.92697495,0.00006581564,0.000020654297,0.00002677507,0.025575638,0.0006962215,0.0008428423,0.016420431,0.026026703,0.00016918703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008675692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022565905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48918763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061845634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017719865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884106802","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.4.04","title":"Strategic Marketing of Electronic Resources in Academic Libraries in Kenya","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Strategic marketing; Marketing; Business; Marketing research; Marketing strategy; Marketing science; Business-to-government; Marketing management; Digital marketing; Public relations; Relationship marketing; Business marketing; Political science","score_opus":0.031304543382952306,"score_gpt":0.2431907781196171,"score_spread":0.2118862347366648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884106802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9628856,0.0016385952,0.00036281193,0.0026525173,0.00020339705,0.00005562502,2.9205373e-7,0.000022798098,0.03217836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99498117,0.00007189029,0.0040439684,0.00025581935,0.00021865538,9.3749014e-7,2.8318394e-7,0.000008659199,0.00041863084],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740237,0.00026273052,0.00095608004,0.00020864334,0.00076398865,0.00040617606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828213,0.00043272297,0.0006803484,0.00016264043,0.00032569357,0.00011644416],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004829806,0.0001259639,0.0002699021,0.0015449779,0.000081915,0.015002917,0.0020491614,0.00017528108,0.000024302091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024316735,0.00010968194,0.000067268564,0.0026070669,0.00007132636,0.1391987,0.0003967594,0.0017022098,0.000001917647],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048960675,0.00014365799,0.8949762,0.000062612104,0.000057756923,0.00008329365,0.010081631,0.00011171829,0.0018822458,0.05920002,0.00417351,0.028737767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032390023,0.00088717375,0.7341819,0.0015103739,0.000008691644,0.00021792843,0.0042131944,0.00312574,0.0043510357,0.19725697,0.05033679,0.0006712271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015769961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001905439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16079432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011904531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007972262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9860196},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2884505918","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.4.02","title":"Understanding Chinese Multilingual Scholars' Experiences of Publishing Research in English","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Mainland China; China; Mainland; Scale (ratio); Sociology; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Public relations; Media studies; Social science; Geography","score_opus":0.22047077825037129,"score_gpt":0.37908839335195343,"score_spread":0.15861761510158215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884505918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8766561,0.0017341786,0.00005118049,0.0011638621,0.0022793722,0.000088822526,0.000005936531,0.000025366193,0.117995195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99285614,0.000053091684,0.00055599783,0.0001419804,0.00602766,0.000004918048,0.0000024165058,0.000029890138,0.0003279242],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99453855,0.0005548176,0.0013583844,0.0003287093,0.0025948447,0.00062467024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98955387,0.00084241945,0.0009353447,0.00036602668,0.008108914,0.0001934562],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017812299,0.00022667662,0.0006053404,0.0027461469,0.0008203772,0.056702144,0.0018170774,0.00016967788,0.00069939607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03521832,0.00017287888,0.00023355325,0.0010878608,0.0012691239,0.15386221,0.000494138,0.0033340568,0.0000037233988],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010042709,0.0002083962,0.024397269,0.000041268217,0.0002515828,0.00008597723,0.92705286,0.000012760111,0.00018348245,0.040573783,0.0050162645,0.0020759152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009387278,0.00020901047,0.0013085421,0.00062585203,0.00003855797,0.000010608541,0.9816129,0.000050882227,0.00018589436,0.008638739,0.006170089,0.00021017363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043754512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015095107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11766727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039248288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032754955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99896526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884599176","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.4.01","title":"Early Career Researchers' Quest for Reputation in the Digital Age","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Desk; Public relations; Quality (philosophy); Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.7239339683949573,"score_gpt":0.5697957248491814,"score_spread":0.15413824354577588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884599176","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96541494,0.0005082483,0.0035013144,0.013424897,0.0006165301,0.00024952847,0.00002048049,0.0000054484567,0.01625862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99632096,0.000018319803,0.0016027724,0.00037845204,0.0008220896,0.0000039411575,0.0000020024847,0.000009676492,0.0008417947],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9831911,0.00049843837,0.0011594818,0.00035457883,0.014220049,0.00057635753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9614531,0.010817143,0.0008574481,0.00064670935,0.025775133,0.000450489],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1395951,0.00009813436,0.00023944814,0.035928737,0.00033289212,0.30096912,0.0054880385,0.0001687004,0.000044225504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.47680813,0.000054463566,0.00019337544,0.07974484,0.0001927125,0.09142416,0.00039307898,0.0015741144,0.000031094434],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023429313,0.00022336406,0.37237158,0.00000681369,0.000032562166,0.00018210695,0.0056148022,0.000013283005,0.0006426734,0.004159913,0.13961817,0.47690043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012199235,0.0012040266,0.7071711,0.0000433191,0.0000056406243,0.00007671696,0.0062667173,0.0003155942,0.00013027308,0.05537402,0.22804727,0.00014541773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010217861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003596282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.476755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021753063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045408943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895815720","doi":"10.3138/jsp.50.1.07","title":"China’s Recently Launched English-Language Science and Technology Journals, 2012–16","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Publishing; Launched; Face (sociological concept); Period (music); Political science; Library science; English language; Sociology; Engineering; Computer science; Social science; Mathematics education; Psychology","score_opus":0.056493323197319124,"score_gpt":0.3791769843658927,"score_spread":0.32268366116857355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895815720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8893685,0.0075550764,0.0014539296,0.065356456,0.004603337,0.00014229568,0.000010827095,0.0000733476,0.03143623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99012387,0.00019685448,0.003565284,0.001417067,0.0032541992,0.0000014460583,6.1712063e-7,0.000026018928,0.0014146302],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98733604,0.00042840478,0.0021439262,0.00077169866,0.008415716,0.00090419647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9679405,0.00062790094,0.0029689216,0.00091923197,0.026553089,0.0009903683],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.089215666,0.00029047238,0.0007004618,0.0054903664,0.0012684249,0.16004762,0.011239207,0.00062469696,0.00056116586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.39340988,0.00020056075,0.00012499129,0.010238036,0.001482104,0.32506838,0.001984651,0.0056055174,0.00003673339],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011988806,0.00011150122,0.057908405,0.0000067359592,0.000070614544,0.00008924655,0.010924016,0.0000029002622,0.013574515,0.004703535,0.37607932,0.5364093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041753924,0.0009294214,0.16452785,0.0007845019,0.0001183135,0.0032341385,0.061146554,0.00031071916,0.01189002,0.10834782,0.64333135,0.0012039096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008475318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031346928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5352054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004833605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018693635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895831373","doi":"10.3138/jsp.50.1.06","title":"Dynamics of Journal Impact Factors and Limits to Their Inflation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Citation; Statistics; Dynamics (music); Econometrics; Extrapolation; Mathematics; Computer science; Psychology; Library science; Political science","score_opus":0.447630236235392,"score_gpt":0.5249796450590765,"score_spread":0.07734940882368446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895831373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9840262,0.00041117094,0.008602442,0.0049562096,0.0008223767,0.00006656032,0.000020948622,0.0000031966642,0.0010909077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968805,0.00009106706,0.0023569826,0.000106559564,0.00046788843,1.1371847e-7,6.399217e-7,0.000009662007,0.00008663651],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889944,0.0003181364,0.0014220235,0.00023083978,0.008622805,0.00041177793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9644247,0.0032139902,0.0017361186,0.00033124906,0.029182598,0.0011113439],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.057099577,0.00014242307,0.00041817373,0.056698967,0.00034396088,0.093366526,0.002717692,0.00018151666,0.00015756975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22687237,0.00007676118,0.0002351709,0.06502324,0.00011861272,0.071746975,0.0004692263,0.001431889,0.000006803011],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053757383,0.00004245686,0.8758141,0.0000016667375,0.000039930055,0.0000058608985,0.000924752,0.00003335299,0.0029263208,0.00023021293,0.00621649,0.11371113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000428857,0.0011279681,0.97951066,0.00004404513,0.000008161217,0.0001826453,0.0020764545,0.001260086,0.0011781048,0.01137241,0.002703199,0.00010742415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000050397444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030553696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1697728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032928682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054290134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9709144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896426591","doi":"10.3138/jsp.50.1.04","title":"Fondling the Lemur’s Tail: A Discussion of Book Reviewing in Which Lemurs Figure Only Metaphorically","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Theatre and Performance Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lemur; Criticism; Neglect; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Philosophy; History; Sociology; Literature; Art; Psychology","score_opus":0.040620819874342136,"score_gpt":0.2611095774892178,"score_spread":0.22048875761487569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896426591","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6023255,0.06438154,0.00019059854,0.11845288,0.004934261,0.0005555398,0.00002794353,0.000052762756,0.209079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918083,0.0012061847,0.00032663852,0.0012209199,0.0029621003,0.0000025638772,0.0000015541978,0.000020993824,0.0024507246],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977132,0.00018461056,0.00096862885,0.00014115167,0.0006979461,0.00029444348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970207,0.00017434539,0.00076464494,0.00022163751,0.0017446076,0.000074032345],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004384298,0.00016563277,0.00046022973,0.00033867516,0.0005765953,0.005743702,0.0007390754,0.00007718013,0.00044307348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016015635,0.000077185854,0.00019865207,0.00027461766,0.00015978949,0.03358403,0.00015660304,0.0014529671,0.000008576593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000512909,0.00041222348,0.053250354,0.0005302318,0.00084273977,0.00004012064,0.44746658,0.00004350339,0.0016167605,0.06535596,0.23487426,0.19505437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047219606,0.00031595887,0.003415684,0.0012444212,0.00010031038,0.000022682714,0.016037842,0.000022113316,0.00007220172,0.0017670356,0.97637975,0.00014979688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013204713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012274678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7415055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007439709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019882525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99528843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896621274","doi":"10.3138/jsp.50.1.05","title":"Reasons for Publishing Scholarly Book Reviews from a Journal Editor’s Perspective","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Perspective (graphical); Library science; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07597274156604553,"score_gpt":0.29342960510166444,"score_spread":0.2174568635356189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896621274","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043126203,0.20919573,0.011722606,0.37476704,0.09928347,0.002168016,0.00073674164,0.0005003096,0.2584999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33012936,0.006406723,0.06035012,0.03195763,0.5498669,0.000110550965,0.00023119488,0.00049590855,0.02045162],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99293345,0.0011995188,0.0023078807,0.000529442,0.0021730403,0.0008566904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96352524,0.0011953879,0.004168546,0.0011067966,0.02908519,0.000918873],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.024302892,0.0004947865,0.0009796392,0.0014102104,0.0034015137,0.5038108,0.0053390935,0.0005409049,0.0010774459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09690689,0.00040821772,0.0008615834,0.00042760203,0.00042106924,0.6047764,0.00048346593,0.009082155,0.00005822234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019703656,0.00017155251,0.000559309,0.000017096132,0.0002875215,0.000010754672,0.03293147,7.556407e-7,0.00034678786,0.05017959,0.9043582,0.010939941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018048028,0.00058428734,0.0006114119,0.0008482804,0.00022382225,0.0001270498,0.017398335,0.000029605666,0.000040649997,0.038178086,0.9397091,0.00044454067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00084335374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047606477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45058343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012154897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012207936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896991518","doi":"10.3138/jsp.50.1.01","title":"Special Section on the Value of Scholarly Book Reviews","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Theme (computing); Publishing; Conversation; Value (mathematics); Special section; Library science; Journal editor; Sociology; Media studies; History; Political science; Computer science; Law; Engineering; World Wide Web; Engineering physics","score_opus":0.08213266406570253,"score_gpt":0.26732118788285636,"score_spread":0.18518852381715384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896991518","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2426961,0.007168932,0.00016129749,0.05898275,0.01803975,0.0004960834,0.000026150768,0.00006814119,0.6723608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80900127,0.0015647736,0.0012857851,0.014784108,0.15736106,0.000015117774,0.000016362677,0.000095291805,0.015876215],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955186,0.0011439265,0.0013873397,0.00021310466,0.0014259752,0.00031100312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915954,0.00051054836,0.0020450926,0.00080784934,0.0048669507,0.00017419152],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01619417,0.000226544,0.0004585613,0.000638294,0.0012459113,0.094393276,0.0025488033,0.00021007781,0.0015043736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017636374,0.00014631147,0.000354015,0.00031625282,0.00034146177,0.21307774,0.00022337053,0.004398279,0.00007265305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009853837,0.00013249388,0.00052272336,0.000017439368,0.00008053355,0.0000024018598,0.013609268,0.0000021182416,0.000671567,0.23849343,0.7369019,0.009467608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004249769,0.0005361552,0.0020725385,0.0004512779,0.000057765687,0.000025740117,0.002069298,0.000012160635,0.00023889614,0.004377885,0.98957527,0.00015803022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016556727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012606848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6564846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022909215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026572502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99940836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897215433","doi":"10.3138/jsp.50.1.08","title":"Attitudes toward Open Access, Open Peer Review, and Altmetrics among Contributors to Spanish Scholarly Journals","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Publishing; Enthusiasm; Scholarly communication; Perception; Social media; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Library science; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.758141670926953,"score_gpt":0.6392867207315888,"score_spread":0.11885495019536418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897215433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5990026,0.04902576,0.008671069,0.30186382,0.004470392,0.0031026965,0.00022317005,0.000035302906,0.03360518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95287555,0.0071098404,0.013674828,0.017460732,0.0014691785,0.000017775465,0.000004906275,0.00006054189,0.0073266677],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.963189,0.0013691935,0.0035637082,0.0012032903,0.029406738,0.0012680707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77658755,0.0065591517,0.005138132,0.0019186791,0.20490092,0.004895574],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.31423882,0.0003829981,0.0016074291,0.058375504,0.0012692852,0.83007383,0.047222,0.0004042124,0.0018578268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.74306494,0.00026191704,0.00029197396,0.18360923,0.0002909422,0.50997126,0.027866332,0.003996487,0.00013187176],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004812728,0.00010988504,0.49586335,0.000017526903,0.00008058001,0.000050669078,0.00012810562,0.0000013775418,0.00013308058,0.00029834875,0.464008,0.039260957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011700437,0.0005539239,0.6398397,0.00048911467,0.000062440966,0.00015350408,0.0003138107,0.000013684741,0.00017866802,0.004578036,0.3523437,0.0003033778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081484666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012184648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42882612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056730636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018866401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897256221","doi":"10.3138/jsp.50.1.02","title":"So What If It’s Not the <i>New York Times</i>: Why One University Press Seeks Book Reviews in Scholarly Journals","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Mainstream; Work (physics); Scholarly communication; Sociology; Media studies; Social science; Publishing; Library science; Political science; Law; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.11197399583893534,"score_gpt":0.26666798609866493,"score_spread":0.15469399025972957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897256221","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018275496,0.14853132,0.0010588523,0.66793865,0.006703883,0.0011120752,0.00004383657,0.00016272486,0.15617314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.578346,0.077175915,0.0073115826,0.18045975,0.029173896,0.000012735298,0.000056202607,0.00031140796,0.12715249],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934136,0.0020472638,0.0016727151,0.00037857375,0.0018378185,0.0006500212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914037,0.0006171031,0.002319554,0.0011583505,0.003971651,0.00052966224],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021271843,0.00036599592,0.00074951624,0.00090946036,0.0021135933,0.3140303,0.00535709,0.0003553035,0.0010998979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075659216,0.00027985199,0.00041685975,0.00052553066,0.00042536407,0.4438009,0.000622312,0.007642371,0.00006484651],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017635798,0.00018597777,0.0003330035,0.00002407902,0.00013800125,0.000021829163,0.038022757,0.000005514158,0.00035220355,0.019156724,0.92113984,0.020443711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011938205,0.00020424096,0.0009897547,0.0018150847,0.00011653849,0.000061612125,0.010098662,0.000024143092,0.000082860206,0.0015931528,0.9834982,0.00032191555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012663485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010202444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5600705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047204518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078976725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897307576","doi":"10.3138/jsp.50.1.03","title":"Who Do You Think You Are? Reading, Authority, and Book Reviewing","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indulgence; Scholarship; Reading (process); Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0592300108144301,"score_gpt":0.2725543769621266,"score_spread":0.21332436614769648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897307576","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39729834,0.08214797,0.00029833705,0.08812851,0.006061693,0.0004181369,0.0000427904,0.0002781579,0.42532608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9633665,0.0032558613,0.0025446936,0.0059425524,0.0099281,0.000004375252,0.000011587246,0.00008501462,0.014861314],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99660957,0.0005357278,0.0010061006,0.00031120886,0.0011099848,0.00042742613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99352765,0.00024493365,0.0011862203,0.0006776056,0.003986259,0.0003773515],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012906479,0.0002644791,0.0005535754,0.0006685484,0.0016294824,0.1537817,0.0018284494,0.00023770632,0.00035716922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010683358,0.00021898137,0.00019597821,0.00021302722,0.0003244319,0.20783772,0.0005036594,0.003509222,0.000024836221],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006477212,0.00012188916,0.014560053,0.00010812852,0.00021624274,0.000026744474,0.07080264,5.850627e-7,0.00032940746,0.18594247,0.69961876,0.028208334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005219387,0.000199179,0.004653317,0.001149615,0.00009371915,0.00012006344,0.0052868044,0.000026285381,0.00003491395,0.008420915,0.9792162,0.0002770503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015459565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007157075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5660682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017933601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017003206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903879082","doi":"","title":"Ethics and Practice in Science Communication ed. by Susanna Priest, Jean Goodwin, Michael F. Dahlstrom (review)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.31974169930383856,"score_gpt":0.48043779560662764,"score_spread":0.16069609630278908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903879082","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08669665,0.1312263,0.00021510923,0.69274616,0.00061007356,0.00041974554,0.000012039669,0.000043448264,0.088030465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36809093,0.61508846,0.005985684,0.010313528,0.0003403661,0.00000351032,0.000010528891,0.000012668607,0.00015432373],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956579,0.0021394643,0.0005702732,0.00015675726,0.001208023,0.00026757625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918441,0.002449733,0.0008439902,0.0004183303,0.004201948,0.00024189703],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04898438,0.00009081906,0.00018703859,0.00027873626,0.0015162348,0.00854027,0.0016428494,0.00019249925,0.00012591935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11744119,0.00008850378,0.00003719263,0.0010206036,0.0011679318,0.06853651,0.0003415241,0.0026955921,0.000008237043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018115799,0.00064904254,0.020738011,0.00023887999,0.000047241712,0.000007899281,0.37044707,0.0000012949962,0.016746657,0.0211017,0.33938247,0.23045857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004157738,0.00011020357,0.005835006,0.001331207,0.000029084908,0.000032609198,0.046365734,0.000015988417,0.0000410401,0.0007931251,0.9448677,0.00016254655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015483401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016393027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68243265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003010945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065260974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906241040","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.4.10","title":"<i>Writing for Publication: Transitions and Tools That Support Scholars' Success</i> by Mary Renck Jalongo and Olivia N. Saracho","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.06316480621438952,"score_gpt":0.26452483865673804,"score_spread":0.2013600324423485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906241040","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8310633,0.006866656,0.0017844538,0.09852839,0.0012839774,0.00062512694,0.0005380324,0.0001720937,0.059138026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887866,0.000271382,0.0036137379,0.0039574727,0.0018836947,0.000022107284,0.00019709919,0.000046429483,0.0012215276],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971718,0.00028390167,0.0009813688,0.00035220315,0.000771506,0.00043918067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932061,0.0005776929,0.00092883204,0.00045386882,0.004432086,0.0004014096],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077129444,0.00025548428,0.00040207405,0.00056172704,0.0019719717,0.18770096,0.0011404967,0.00024477832,0.0002029628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004777626,0.00023703213,0.00014180016,0.0001997408,0.0003960334,0.2814977,0.00019406436,0.0020164726,0.0000043823406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028112836,0.00046426282,0.039628074,0.00022556928,0.00044937115,0.00001546873,0.042133376,4.9076374e-7,0.004538389,0.092458874,0.6933875,0.12641746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023785643,0.0006518978,0.018373715,0.00039208488,0.00019789873,0.0004053243,0.01070826,0.00006056847,0.00034749,0.006607898,0.95928544,0.000590834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009106001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013667115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26589793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009628431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002197451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912618434","doi":"10.3138/jsp.50.2.04","title":"When Literature Scholars Write for General Readers: A Two-Person, First-Person Essay","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rigour; Narrative; Mainstream; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Value (mathematics); Professional writing; The Internet; Media studies; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Literature; Pedagogy; Law; History; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05747061970032791,"score_gpt":0.2548084460867294,"score_spread":0.19733782638640152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912618434","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7923879,0.015659899,0.00059503136,0.106321044,0.0068152696,0.00097353494,0.00022826067,0.0002335227,0.07678551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93654805,0.00012242941,0.02160923,0.0053648804,0.006842456,0.000029944309,0.00019742275,0.00014379132,0.029141806],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99632424,0.00039437736,0.0009059474,0.0004285385,0.0013036567,0.0006432483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99201167,0.00049394375,0.0012395121,0.00082465063,0.0050521037,0.00037813623],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007821401,0.00038095663,0.0006076067,0.0010192703,0.0010699413,0.18487503,0.0026327297,0.0003660487,0.0004196492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049876515,0.00032212748,0.00053849345,0.00026906712,0.00010423466,0.24235258,0.00013202008,0.0047200676,0.000035690675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006129893,0.00043507715,0.01465979,0.00037189183,0.0007952483,0.000049215792,0.34575364,0.00015208498,0.002420713,0.1941619,0.42423248,0.016354946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042989952,0.0005264314,0.0017034357,0.0013306246,0.00014649528,0.00014510548,0.027912337,0.0006309233,0.000076827746,0.0072609703,0.95532167,0.0006461908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000257595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002115445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5310892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042907355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038658228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914134160","doi":"10.3138/jsp.50.2.01","title":"Blacklisting or Whitelisting? Deterring Faculty in Developing Countries from Publishing in Substandard Journals","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blacklisting; Publishing; Thriving; Publication; Scholarship; Developing country; Political science; Deterrence theory; Public relations; Business; Sociology; Law; Economics; Social science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.07795371365937098,"score_gpt":0.346637096801237,"score_spread":0.268683383141866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914134160","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9442925,0.0011612867,0.0009387507,0.039487015,0.0014289788,0.00019754987,0.00003061417,0.000036307738,0.012427034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825935,0.00045985472,0.011955779,0.0029853738,0.0016042329,0.000002036917,0.000008939555,0.000034102162,0.0003562136],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992624,0.001020803,0.0020457604,0.0003905897,0.0029354668,0.000983383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99227625,0.0025235417,0.00186102,0.00019098273,0.0027815886,0.00036663623],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.039916467,0.00027196572,0.00074526016,0.0013392012,0.0005536486,0.06487732,0.0021320581,0.0014239642,0.00044821575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07351432,0.00023736166,0.00015293254,0.0017850086,0.00011457238,0.17037664,0.00025179773,0.011914142,0.000012976457],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001976135,0.000022421651,0.9264509,0.000032349548,0.00003844224,0.00024531604,0.0601226,0.00018039251,0.00015324804,0.0032974288,0.003380372,0.0058789235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005764173,0.00012523905,0.3823194,0.013059237,0.00006119969,0.0001729647,0.14893682,0.00040158306,0.00050285313,0.018422563,0.428829,0.0014049773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011718395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018879432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5441315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019898769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002620743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914136328","doi":"10.3138/jsp.50.2.03","title":"Transitioning Specialized and Developing Journals into a University Press","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Audience measurement; Reputation; Prestige; Publishing; Set (abstract data type); Public relations; Circulation (fluid dynamics); Business; Marketing; Political science; Computer science; Advertising; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.050994963181559855,"score_gpt":0.24066352126325605,"score_spread":0.1896685580816962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914136328","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8964683,0.0032789763,0.0010825173,0.020970576,0.0013016583,0.00013958247,0.00000762449,0.000049511014,0.07670129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99014765,0.00047087797,0.005507944,0.0005491013,0.00090223487,2.5308236e-7,0.0000048240054,0.000019526862,0.002397606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806356,0.0003583787,0.000546089,0.00015181488,0.0006684666,0.00021171519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99658716,0.00023615515,0.0007081208,0.00021717833,0.002078035,0.00017337815],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045094606,0.00013375508,0.00030540553,0.00052789133,0.0006869644,0.07138638,0.00093143416,0.00012294305,0.00018841279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012933097,0.00012387408,0.00011799748,0.00013864106,0.00007802197,0.16564633,0.0001544865,0.0018894625,0.0000044235203],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034505606,0.00012356779,0.011625576,0.00014238764,0.00041977776,0.00007237636,0.11685009,0.000048651804,0.0030805964,0.8184105,0.018011354,0.030870058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017476629,0.0001041005,0.006552086,0.0005896796,0.00006360003,0.00010760091,0.016712775,0.00006109499,0.00006537251,0.005739381,0.96799034,0.00026633352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027684978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000078652956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94997895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021224782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023609836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9295776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914190931","doi":"10.3138/jsp.50.2.08","title":"Christine E. Tulley. <i>How Writing Faculty Write: Strategies for Process, Product, and Productivity</i>.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Product (mathematics); Process (computing); Computer science; Sociology; Mathematics education; Business; Psychology; Economics; Mathematics; Economic growth; Operating system","score_opus":0.03857700358373631,"score_gpt":0.24696475431414058,"score_spread":0.20838775073040428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914190931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8654115,0.0032891147,0.00004286787,0.12902895,0.00051998394,0.0002611617,0.000026336007,0.000030333975,0.0013897247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99121916,0.00011985572,0.000606637,0.00022163804,0.0033319043,0.0000099240615,0.000010330223,0.000019650428,0.004460921],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821675,0.0000516747,0.0004947652,0.00030642742,0.00061723386,0.0003131547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956623,0.000112114205,0.0006573841,0.00012186795,0.0033198912,0.0001264827],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016580891,0.00019807342,0.0004895631,0.00012830764,0.0017334353,0.026212746,0.00035398407,0.000065760505,0.00007534041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018441359,0.00013338619,0.00019050349,0.00014109595,0.000116589974,0.044874944,0.00007746125,0.0008876628,0.0000020321793],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004318754,0.00069845753,0.027981743,0.0026310666,0.0017319261,0.00003829145,0.4194257,0.00010272265,0.0035436181,0.11472634,0.35593867,0.07274961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012648132,0.0004918102,0.0009742357,0.00030425124,0.00026783926,0.000044871464,0.1195983,0.000066382614,0.00005413933,0.015552415,0.8608404,0.0005405713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008534556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014539395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5049017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026643596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010130332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914471576","doi":"10.3138/jsp.50.2.02","title":"Redesigning Scholarly Communications Workflows and Work Habits for the Digital Age: The Greenhouse Studios Proposal","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Studio; Publishing; Workflow; The arts; Sociology; Scholarly communication; Project commissioning; Work (physics); Public relations; Management; Media studies; Library science; Computer science; Visual arts; Engineering; Political science; Telecommunications; Law; Art","score_opus":0.07858927632257073,"score_gpt":0.25292841891340523,"score_spread":0.1743391425908345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914471576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7908138,0.01645128,0.00028683798,0.0723619,0.003260169,0.0023935828,0.00011369927,0.00014635827,0.11417234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98676646,0.00009364945,0.00065053144,0.0013112894,0.0012609124,0.00002496118,0.0000079624515,0.00005308531,0.009831162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975605,0.00016988265,0.00078093953,0.00021254973,0.0008734873,0.00040262696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994757,0.0018565779,0.00069628895,0.00077602355,0.0017624362,0.00015165686],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004642723,0.00024284644,0.00034068784,0.00019826063,0.0021444163,0.2474662,0.0026861215,0.00010890326,0.00006875591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003257365,0.0001344058,0.0002559242,0.00017088099,0.00045633127,0.10980907,0.00059016043,0.0027359969,0.000015272111],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000394093,0.00029259457,0.039065253,0.00008247222,0.0008722207,0.000027273662,0.057933047,0.000028765293,0.00005505984,0.74545324,0.05271272,0.10308326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012743196,0.00042672077,0.009543363,0.00045906048,0.00015909522,0.00006568553,0.02856691,0.000031453987,0.0000039428164,0.016610088,0.9425178,0.00034156247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002469522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001595087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8898051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000087003486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018272782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2937052695","doi":"10.3138/jsp.50.3.03","title":"CJK Languages or English: Languages Used by Academic Journals in China, Japan, and Korea","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Computational and Text Analysis Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; English language; Metadata; Library science; History; Computer science; World Wide Web; Mathematics education; Psychology","score_opus":0.03622785434903873,"score_gpt":0.37659568386975156,"score_spread":0.3403678295207128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2937052695","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97461385,0.0068681627,0.00011969187,0.009147135,0.00031784683,0.000090886264,0.000006346278,0.000016906282,0.00881915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934714,0.00066693977,0.0021201046,0.00037394874,0.0009996049,9.738942e-7,0.000004404807,0.000013475315,0.002349171],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99674106,0.0007925528,0.0006818695,0.00019080141,0.0012676384,0.00032608138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99723524,0.0010167897,0.000689931,0.00010046834,0.0006773612,0.00028023164],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011840083,0.00013422758,0.0004086957,0.0006621934,0.00020622382,0.008823714,0.0007119387,0.00026762974,0.0006669356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012649951,0.000100884405,0.00012294365,0.0009605036,0.0000687956,0.03257305,0.00010169212,0.002219509,0.000004044942],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008513314,0.00008227394,0.85210186,0.000024930016,0.00013432994,0.00006368571,0.06836741,0.00009257044,0.0036287121,0.0027622548,0.010562988,0.062093876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003294528,0.00023811178,0.72515243,0.000754277,0.00014198554,0.00009596245,0.16851407,0.00017131478,0.00027300662,0.0076342383,0.093082644,0.0006474192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011837921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042626506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1269494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001456541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030419626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2938786474","doi":"10.3138/jsp.50.3.01","title":"Humanities Scholars and Library-Based Digital Publishing: New Forms of Publication, New Audiences, New Publishing Roles","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Wikis in Education and Collaboration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scholarly communication; Scholarship; Electronic publishing; Digital scholarship; Digital humanities; Library science; Diversification (marketing strategy); Sociology; Digital library; Political science; Media studies; Public relations; World Wide Web; Computer science; The Internet; Business; Art; Law; Literature; Marketing","score_opus":0.02991858418503142,"score_gpt":0.2704706048311039,"score_spread":0.2405520206460725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2938786474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38270694,0.0042030835,0.0022811242,0.3680327,0.0027225192,0.00063125946,0.000037913058,0.00020623663,0.23917824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9503169,0.00022438519,0.010621913,0.0050567403,0.003773934,0.0000030614924,0.00007879974,0.00005854251,0.02986574],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99483544,0.00024361111,0.0013599691,0.00040332336,0.0026002117,0.0005574758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920375,0.0005233431,0.0023387356,0.0003685728,0.0036227792,0.0011090644],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005042695,0.00026274734,0.000468068,0.0017372322,0.00064555084,0.32763994,0.002503192,0.00049062126,0.0007853481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0329474,0.000242766,0.00017935368,0.0031888953,0.00018440712,0.62004447,0.00020065447,0.0019537034,0.000012382813],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079880374,0.00012678656,0.16570042,0.000041534644,0.00008394835,0.0000016650205,0.021283548,0.00003955654,0.00026740378,0.23938145,0.5034051,0.06958869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016666738,0.00017579315,0.022859093,0.00035156056,0.000039485934,0.00001046434,0.03518379,0.000015617616,0.0002492489,0.042357393,0.8967298,0.00036105324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000983403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048227343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56760997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002980026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011776169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99382615},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2939533502","doi":"10.3138/jsp.50.3.02","title":"Predatory Journals on Trial: Allegations, Responses, and Lessons for Scholarly Publishing from <i>FTC v. OMICS</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute on Drug Abuse; Yale University","keywords":"Publishing; Lawsuit; Interim; Omics; Harm; Law; Political science; Business; Public relations; Biology; Bioinformatics","score_opus":0.18062732462152523,"score_gpt":0.4141231296087894,"score_spread":0.23349580498726416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2939533502","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82735246,0.005309793,0.0028058288,0.15183416,0.0057544946,0.00094271154,0.00059309916,0.000063967644,0.0053434735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96587455,0.00049219467,0.010967619,0.012399541,0.004479002,0.000027529302,0.00004690758,0.00012069572,0.005591968],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98328716,0.002255654,0.0042112693,0.0012481482,0.008068114,0.00092968356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95833385,0.01965705,0.006488226,0.0015582931,0.012605593,0.0013569988],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10022861,0.0005064025,0.0013608488,0.0031533039,0.0010021168,0.553503,0.009860905,0.0013630518,0.00029336472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.38801432,0.0003905878,0.00060158543,0.002040767,0.00013047837,0.6040409,0.0011054856,0.010077059,0.000050749353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.023812227,0.00039702607,0.06399242,0.000026520152,0.0005308537,0.000054251403,0.002387554,0.00023513965,0.0045962706,0.019627016,0.7817788,0.10256193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03742211,0.0009180995,0.04998861,0.00074882456,0.0001399421,0.00016438837,0.0071351742,0.00038968353,0.0004939818,0.13203721,0.76975685,0.0008051087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018861298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026170283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2877857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004704595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019291736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2957234107","doi":"10.3138/jsp.50.4.02","title":"Professionalizing Peer Review Suggestions for a More Ethical and Pedagogical Review Process","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Constructive; Constructive criticism; Criticism; Peer review; Action (physics); Process (computing); Engineering ethics; Payment; Orthodoxy; Composition (language); Sociology; Publishing; Psychology; Public relations; Computer science; Political science; Law; Engineering; History; World Wide Web; Linguistics","score_opus":0.2110460948203188,"score_gpt":0.49813968717449203,"score_spread":0.2870935923541732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2957234107","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008224362,0.04623089,0.00015908518,0.93890077,0.0006270809,0.00056505867,0.0000026029604,0.000019088264,0.005271054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14406277,0.14501579,0.06423462,0.6128835,0.0030199075,0.00019184567,0.000048671212,0.0000746013,0.030468253],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99641454,0.00035711774,0.0005980127,0.00016577076,0.0022204872,0.00024409314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99116635,0.0006862963,0.00033679244,0.0000967082,0.0073753325,0.00033850837],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022591552,0.000092231036,0.00033722457,0.000084647014,0.0004467419,0.0034599302,0.00045969873,0.00024218412,0.00034650337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.076607436,0.00006868669,0.00011174161,0.0003706225,0.00009641308,0.01083619,0.000052804997,0.002305445,0.0000067481424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024807512,0.00020975534,0.010187484,0.011187689,0.000063791864,0.0000079852925,0.0243374,3.2932363e-7,0.000031689997,0.4202307,0.5185963,0.0151220495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002636516,0.000040249575,0.0019170964,0.029982276,0.00007368426,0.000032425254,0.006557467,0.0000010646764,0.000001497692,0.027364181,0.9336273,0.00013912118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008518999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003553334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41503096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000109238135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013650813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999963},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W295736281","doi":"","title":"A Scholar's Guide to Getting Published in English: Critical Choices and Practical Strategies by Mary Jane Curry, Theresa Lillis (review)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curry; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03230339388743958,"score_gpt":0.31180214443501886,"score_spread":0.2794987505475793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W295736281","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2846311,0.07935731,0.0010656739,0.32304898,0.004057316,0.00090165547,0.000100880745,0.00034548447,0.3064916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9568937,0.003829236,0.01474804,0.018498221,0.004571869,0.000041897543,0.000059729864,0.00012410565,0.0012332405],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936442,0.0016528191,0.0018858904,0.00051754055,0.0015949388,0.0007046419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99004114,0.0025454941,0.00096459285,0.0007861891,0.004939115,0.00072348147],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02509114,0.0003874035,0.0007961262,0.00085858913,0.000768159,0.15285829,0.0017077998,0.0002944292,0.00041034137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14926927,0.00032513033,0.00018002585,0.00042578593,0.0002208852,0.2783219,0.00058892317,0.006802798,0.000010780367],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011298655,0.00049840775,0.0058138785,0.00052036,0.00012368245,0.000049266717,0.014669187,0.000008552635,0.00058262574,0.11487829,0.83654606,0.026196731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008534249,0.0002799324,0.0026852982,0.0018446157,0.00007758219,0.000089671186,0.008857367,0.000067647255,0.000017962637,0.004214086,0.980579,0.00043341468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062918034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039668454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67226255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002053118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004199617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2957835826","doi":"10.3138/jsp.50.4.03","title":"A Survey of Enhanced Publication Features of China’s Science and Technology Research Journals in 2018","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Publishing; Presentation (obstetrics); Discipline; Library science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Computer science; Sociology; Social science; Geography; Medicine","score_opus":0.15995774683560912,"score_gpt":0.4607574699969299,"score_spread":0.30079972316132075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2957835826","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9669706,0.0026756057,0.00012810781,0.0201276,0.0005110749,0.00018445085,0.000012111655,0.0000054276666,0.0093850065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983668,0.0001507396,0.0008474748,0.000096242424,0.00007461705,0.000001468524,9.0269316e-7,0.000010132961,0.000451629],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9830435,0.0014996026,0.0029783626,0.0006355982,0.011173566,0.0006693717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9403221,0.002970816,0.0036704685,0.000833197,0.051877525,0.00032588022],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24322286,0.00013839577,0.0007251701,0.0108121885,0.00021520292,0.033761412,0.008594533,0.0004649286,0.000089936126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.501198,0.000098306504,0.000056832814,0.021423927,0.0008199021,0.15937075,0.001351589,0.0049967105,0.000005184115],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013320161,0.00011553914,0.7955917,0.0000186271,0.000021556472,0.0000033834863,0.001346695,0.000022084974,0.07683567,0.0030711524,0.03321598,0.08962439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069760403,0.00018045762,0.9734976,0.00029291364,0.0000033642016,0.00006012481,0.002089363,0.00006051941,0.009760248,0.01215173,0.0011065642,0.000099467456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009967817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014365162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25797513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024870585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003409853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962350721","doi":"10.3138/jsp.50.4.01","title":"An Exploratory Study to Measure the Value and Reach of a University Press","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Value (mathematics); Publishing; Publication; Institution; Sociology; Publicity; Public relations; Exploratory research; Psychology; Marketing; Social science; Political science; Advertising; Business; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.05893801123042625,"score_gpt":0.24086585499042626,"score_spread":0.18192784376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2962350721","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9842829,0.00048136854,0.000028282524,0.0030287623,0.00037520155,0.00022186631,0.000008635273,0.00001716134,0.011555812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99869716,0.000016533906,0.00018405986,0.00023399029,0.00024295543,5.2662455e-7,0.000001394015,0.000012300464,0.0006110573],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734604,0.0011856025,0.00038468296,0.00014527002,0.00079367025,0.00014475767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99637204,0.0002512545,0.00049293565,0.0005686703,0.002150819,0.00016426024],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010734848,0.000105594234,0.00023415737,0.00028667398,0.00038636566,0.02545286,0.0016969377,0.00005642325,0.00002188185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015889738,0.000075081894,0.00006459561,0.00013130123,0.00006008506,0.10449675,0.00025334232,0.0014573765,0.00000149531],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007207645,0.0015334431,0.08699776,0.000053887386,0.00044597712,0.0000207556,0.721297,0.00019291388,0.002864955,0.1594035,0.018342275,0.008126745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023528961,0.0021890823,0.07400475,0.00028769035,0.00020421097,0.000026964344,0.596874,0.00010288605,0.00007555092,0.00088267075,0.32264066,0.0003586399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045153388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002609691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30429837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007405948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014084538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9755588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964216187","doi":"10.3138/jsp.42.2.238","title":"Extending ArXiv.org to Achieve Open Peer Review and Publishing","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Preprint; Publishing; Incentive; Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Process (computing); Extension (predicate logic); Scientific publishing; World Wide Web; Political science; Law; Economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.19588794700253984,"score_gpt":0.44187612740418136,"score_spread":0.24598818040164153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964216187","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3660972,0.006173925,0.0014435214,0.5810792,0.0039610392,0.00056315924,0.000032393684,0.000042480187,0.040607113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8979098,0.00091063685,0.021092752,0.06174344,0.0035293556,0.000018847168,0.0000116700385,0.00009514416,0.01468831],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855762,0.00080708455,0.003153045,0.0010222006,0.008590101,0.00085135555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96736646,0.003422079,0.00402621,0.001626531,0.02119105,0.0023676532],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16154686,0.00037854735,0.0012292215,0.0016227767,0.0008286475,0.48422632,0.021119138,0.00064463634,0.0006521776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5303935,0.0002677575,0.00025469458,0.0037507324,0.00011433156,0.55428517,0.0058242483,0.011752885,0.000070216236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053091993,0.000046192406,0.09476893,0.000030376408,0.000049779515,0.000048375787,0.00069231575,0.0000051659813,0.0011734859,0.0036841836,0.8009968,0.0984513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080769806,0.00012817321,0.09560572,0.00083097786,0.000099917466,0.0007746781,0.0013194123,0.000023740356,0.00008955593,0.021225194,0.87864494,0.0004499907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023783142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008001258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53181267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014349261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074677577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982303973","doi":"10.3138/jsp.51.1.05","title":"Trends and Cycles in the Publication of Solo Papers in Business and Economics Journals","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publish or perish; Competition (biology); Publication; Economics; Publishing; Marketing; Political science; Library science; Business; Advertising; Computer science; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.351635277265701,"score_gpt":0.47927893181120435,"score_spread":0.12764365454550336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982303973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95591396,0.0020110132,0.000017381115,0.035401452,0.0001793672,0.000053909353,0.0000040323957,8.4588453e-7,0.006418034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974744,0.0016501625,0.0004213217,0.00027631162,0.000056000725,5.861848e-7,4.6515632e-7,0.0000042857437,0.00011646903],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947567,0.00035232745,0.0012569913,0.0002397332,0.0031337831,0.00026049602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99103296,0.003257003,0.001147588,0.0002874755,0.004098883,0.00017609414],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07500159,0.00008124484,0.00032322056,0.058203477,0.000067018605,0.057176836,0.0019032,0.00013096447,0.00008983826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068326645,0.00004723495,0.00005875444,0.06296695,0.00007355121,0.04688539,0.00030666278,0.0009668356,0.0000014173867],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017854603,0.000042263935,0.76181865,0.0000034948212,0.0000050703325,0.0000031760246,0.00040747877,0.000041989144,0.0005537916,0.0007412535,0.0006593351,0.23570563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066605734,0.000059846054,0.9861735,0.00003287544,0.0000023627188,0.00007700568,0.0018956109,0.00041590602,0.000018361387,0.0035947894,0.0070093996,0.000054261967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007792405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000066628694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23565137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007357201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000193474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9664453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982344414","doi":"10.3138/jsp.51.1.03","title":"Understanding Australian Academic Authors in the Humanities and Social Sciences Their Publishing Experiences, Values, and Perspectives","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Reputation; Prestige; Quality (philosophy); Sociology; Digital humanities; Public relations; Scholarly communication; Social science; Media studies; Library science; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.8168404902069049,"score_gpt":0.5239685361619547,"score_spread":0.29287195404495014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982344414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95297307,0.0034028823,0.00017395674,0.037652202,0.00055678276,0.0001484113,0.0000053557524,0.000007257917,0.0050800685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99800754,0.00024647004,0.0003414855,0.0006196984,0.00031265712,0.0000021697322,3.3702264e-7,0.000007854328,0.0004617764],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98736393,0.0009949734,0.0010401325,0.0005636288,0.009382386,0.00065495697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99060345,0.0056617474,0.0009723223,0.00023279636,0.0023778263,0.0001518817],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12019157,0.0001793685,0.0003952062,0.029854633,0.0014566964,0.3168559,0.0045903036,0.00029541663,0.0000914295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05396533,0.000099883495,0.00011085819,0.04007465,0.000991445,0.1525619,0.0007762882,0.00364417,0.0000020469172],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044973844,0.00007192965,0.51687473,0.000017998202,0.00003380703,0.000030114023,0.36455187,0.000018971192,0.0007438198,0.06756373,0.037360474,0.012687554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000477548,0.0001885718,0.12357109,0.000050062787,0.0000046488863,0.000120901175,0.81207377,0.00022718776,0.000019679086,0.054851424,0.008266755,0.00014833367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009971058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001612024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44752192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033568335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043893844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982372518","doi":"10.3138/jsp.51.1.04","title":"Scholarly Review, Old and New","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; History; Bust; Classics; Boom","score_opus":0.04607697061658009,"score_gpt":0.23767454105393224,"score_spread":0.19159757043735215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982372518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49123374,0.1560263,0.000054662654,0.06976515,0.0044377875,0.0003746023,0.0000105749,0.00007236293,0.2780248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.595509,0.04013453,0.005244069,0.057087593,0.014521847,0.0000044682797,0.000016888276,0.00016683541,0.28731477],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979621,0.000087818466,0.000635632,0.00017608504,0.000876285,0.0002620546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789315,0.00008357864,0.0005334145,0.00023693706,0.0009303508,0.0003225666],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025067688,0.00016226737,0.0003820592,0.0002633518,0.00020434777,0.053529557,0.00060956285,0.00009229255,0.0017809323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00091945747,0.00011943836,0.00014571125,0.00010181717,0.000038860362,0.1651424,0.00012135771,0.001595054,0.00011694572],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050626986,0.00007481911,0.011309063,0.00040864345,0.00017203327,0.000046830737,0.009989933,0.0000013687647,0.0007754309,0.12693094,0.82259816,0.027642187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007255795,0.00016550694,0.0016453083,0.0014798191,0.000069441805,0.00008830375,0.0015513841,0.0000023592572,0.000030391026,0.0036790783,0.99039143,0.00017136578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010348149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001801399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16779333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006439426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013389645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99913156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982502942","doi":"10.3138/jsp.51.1.01","title":"When We Began: The Origins of <i>JSP</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Pragmatism; Subject (documents); Advice (programming); Marsh; Management; Sociology; Art history; Library science; History; Philosophy; Art; Epistemology; Computer science; Literature; Economics; Ecology","score_opus":0.05011570443188688,"score_gpt":0.22315068409208344,"score_spread":0.17303497966019657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982502942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6739898,0.0018748782,0.0000070526717,0.011766551,0.002328238,0.00012653886,0.000029625506,0.00001887559,0.30985844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97991717,0.00005526667,0.000101774946,0.0014986753,0.0015600465,0.0000010299393,0.0000027098547,0.00002649507,0.016836809],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976313,0.00009847872,0.0007850418,0.00013241416,0.0010685093,0.00028424378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99675864,0.00028761174,0.0008432279,0.00032689277,0.0016601532,0.00012346901],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002582303,0.00016384615,0.00034989018,0.00025874932,0.00027454642,0.043330606,0.001432809,0.00008521781,0.002244732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006219766,0.00010054162,0.00029314353,0.00007792969,0.00016312664,0.08960905,0.0001512263,0.0016277343,0.000053653108],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052768377,0.00008651637,0.002553682,0.00005229189,0.00012441166,0.000012568078,0.028199729,0.000006943539,0.00014341765,0.9164565,0.046503812,0.0058073145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049205346,0.00023998917,0.00050087203,0.00021482975,0.0000388908,0.00003477659,0.015648857,0.0000035572318,0.00008745463,0.029650483,0.9529558,0.00013247649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016561156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90645194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001276189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001698368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99866736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982640339","doi":"10.3138/jsp.51.1.02","title":"Fifty Years of <i>JSP</i>: Golden Anniversary Compilation, compiled and edited by Mary Lui and Robert Brown","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; History; Classics; Library science; Art history; Art; Literature; Computer science","score_opus":0.17878415953494883,"score_gpt":0.4211352943766775,"score_spread":0.24235113484172868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982640339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9873369,0.004963651,0.00052729435,0.0034190551,0.0006954324,0.00013339805,0.00007772439,0.0000061303454,0.0028404398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955665,0.00054925575,0.0022639323,0.00033630143,0.00014875567,2.760647e-7,0.000007717336,0.000011068784,0.0011161896],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910604,0.00029893426,0.0010485877,0.00036505013,0.006906844,0.00032019385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98840326,0.0034543935,0.0010527112,0.00033908142,0.006241718,0.0005088567],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.024963142,0.00012253123,0.0004767154,0.020007333,0.00012631596,0.032092735,0.0017383166,0.00019929743,0.0002157566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026338972,0.00009674621,0.00010873865,0.031367827,0.00013970121,0.053668704,0.0007453777,0.0011369567,0.000010490249],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064497624,0.00007058264,0.7107746,0.000011162419,0.000038255333,0.000014277505,0.00024756344,0.000019081277,0.0061338255,0.00010269035,0.23645315,0.046070334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015214654,0.00027279448,0.9003911,0.000058722868,0.000013251475,0.000070980255,0.00072925224,0.0011541697,0.00015119434,0.0013073641,0.09419139,0.00013831614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008630002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002887858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18961653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007615314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019116323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9911001},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W3008285975","doi":"10.3138/jsp.51.2.01","title":"Exporting China’s Scholarly Books: Current Conditions for Chinese Publishers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; China; Negotiation; Quality (philosophy); Subsidy; State (computer science); Intellectual property; Economics; Marketing; Business; Sociology; Political science; Law; Market economy; Computer science","score_opus":0.3997333539609277,"score_gpt":0.534722518974928,"score_spread":0.13498916501400027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008285975","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96130157,0.0038811609,0.0058825114,0.010825593,0.006705358,0.00055613916,0.000072146504,0.0000327935,0.010742741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925384,0.00007874789,0.0035327356,0.00046523064,0.0010763687,0.000012334102,0.000014657722,0.000038399234,0.0022431237],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9776248,0.0004423027,0.002971505,0.00081128505,0.017087374,0.0010627322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9486669,0.0058071055,0.004079343,0.0012293472,0.038628265,0.0015890962],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.104423486,0.00031029293,0.0007872301,0.06015354,0.0006749881,0.43927863,0.007593375,0.0003145492,0.000805099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.42231962,0.00020939423,0.0008116836,0.07158014,0.000100832185,0.40046743,0.0009847599,0.0037681854,0.00012094214],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074808515,0.00026589783,0.70770955,0.000025219335,0.000066590335,0.000017045317,0.00044154486,0.00012328291,0.0037003718,0.0027852582,0.16543421,0.11935621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030685035,0.00058619026,0.6946169,0.00014089285,0.00002906126,0.00013940006,0.0021413532,0.0013725052,0.00013065939,0.05690181,0.24041279,0.00045994378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003951732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000058093956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31789613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045169072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013578582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99853015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009582709","doi":"10.3138/jsp.51.2.02","title":"Forming an Intellectual Community of Practice for Scholarly Writing at a Professionally Focused University","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Reflective Practices in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publish or perish; Context (archaeology); Institution; Publication; Discipline; Sociology; Passion; Process (computing); Higher education; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Psychology; Publishing; Political science; Computer science; Social science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.07602920545386443,"score_gpt":0.387443987278106,"score_spread":0.31141478182424154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009582709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9505117,0.00014272956,0.0018030795,0.007465684,0.0009747669,0.00041687774,0.0000059377617,0.00002085227,0.03865839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94775915,0.000052170933,0.0505779,0.00032655674,0.0004200654,0.0000012953865,0.0000046585,0.000019652594,0.0008385574],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939467,0.0035426465,0.00064576895,0.00017302716,0.0013487042,0.00034320078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9786241,0.009487699,0.0024009612,0.00030136938,0.008927213,0.00025866728],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03181718,0.00012526034,0.00029774924,0.0005238189,0.0018348997,0.008251206,0.0015999858,0.0002926003,0.00009009111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13752589,0.00012764226,0.00015685476,0.0008144848,0.00012987353,0.2932296,0.00029045297,0.0033499917,0.000005157358],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0043140366,0.002614079,0.17716242,0.0002482434,0.00056702737,0.00001399859,0.6161224,0.000084560656,0.045031384,0.046598125,0.004405893,0.10283781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025866255,0.001464485,0.017182903,0.0006126099,0.00021044184,0.000060205835,0.65665734,0.00008329987,0.0011359795,0.0058633573,0.313775,0.0003677589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012400574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005086441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3093691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014099829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001964457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011503241","doi":"10.3138/jsp.51.2.03","title":"Honouring Clio: Book Awards, Historical Scholarship, and Publishers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scholarship; Library science; Publication; History; Classics; Scholarly communication; Media studies; Political science; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.03743165148719975,"score_gpt":0.22309115449502293,"score_spread":0.1856595030078232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011503241","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8054846,0.018895268,0.00005228718,0.046709254,0.005349026,0.00023489636,0.000008060147,0.000142001,0.12312464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97670484,0.00027879915,0.0011706637,0.0027317577,0.001985529,0.000003820777,0.000010215507,0.00006232081,0.017052045],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996153,0.00043522427,0.0011363033,0.00034372875,0.001437361,0.00049440435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99455637,0.00039901864,0.0011476676,0.00065304775,0.0027587975,0.0004850828],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008678782,0.0002802371,0.00054425676,0.0011001029,0.0006611503,0.189557,0.0020496775,0.00029167059,0.0006749884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064114016,0.0002468302,0.00024886944,0.00024162841,0.00010091003,0.41237912,0.00043754335,0.0051472713,0.000041114392],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027756035,0.0004645122,0.14564893,0.0001988559,0.0005090766,0.00007486135,0.03133057,0.000030566567,0.0015374622,0.13895299,0.64112985,0.039844785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001122932,0.00021516859,0.009496503,0.00022004348,0.00005428449,0.000107375316,0.0028255149,0.000023320268,0.000030179846,0.0033696953,0.98221475,0.0003202514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006055883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3410849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008495605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003475402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022447455","doi":"10.3138/jsp.51.3.03","title":"Paper Online Rating Platforms An Emerging Publishing System","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Scientific Computing and Data Management","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Rating system; Computer science; Electronic publishing; World Wide Web; Data science; The Internet; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.24836197757265047,"score_gpt":0.3744848465904446,"score_spread":0.12612286901779415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022447455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8725301,0.0005436867,0.05800877,0.054982524,0.0051531675,0.00018500008,0.000049940183,0.0002061549,0.008340639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9678622,0.000004178773,0.024114916,0.004771664,0.0029885308,7.35977e-7,0.000025071571,0.000027542746,0.00020517295],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98842824,0.0003791377,0.0028582348,0.0008811025,0.0068566413,0.0005966626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98909575,0.0011953819,0.0028297722,0.0010981725,0.004646444,0.0011344603],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0474805,0.00025898585,0.0006119209,0.0010883372,0.0007513434,0.25628,0.0064152963,0.00018271188,0.00015020915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10425552,0.00018238586,0.00029162332,0.0033042417,0.00005033326,0.3653628,0.0014701659,0.002625739,0.00004087166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016841662,0.00024341272,0.026557924,0.00008953861,0.00018173785,0.000648465,0.012384481,0.010275813,0.003968156,0.012735742,0.4372836,0.4954627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043995674,0.0008137238,0.036478106,0.0010799669,0.00016750341,0.000854509,0.24062864,0.21630837,0.00017487771,0.010916917,0.48686695,0.0013108547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006243357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002225439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49415183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019613384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002919681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023134157","doi":"10.3138/jsp.51.3.01","title":"Do Tenure and Promotion Policies Discourage Publications in Predatory Journals?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Promotion (chess); Public relations; Institution; Productivity; Quality (philosophy); Political science; Action (physics); Academic institution; Business; Management; Economics; Law; Economic growth","score_opus":0.6761453625303655,"score_gpt":0.5539823309204654,"score_spread":0.12216303160990005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023134157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81818897,0.0037062548,0.0020360001,0.17285411,0.00025713287,0.00012822656,0.000020530337,0.000009733652,0.0027990444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99698657,0.00048800866,0.001269759,0.00057061866,0.00043790808,0.0000018000451,9.009578e-7,0.000010507677,0.00023395312],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873075,0.0004751687,0.0015091663,0.0003913026,0.0098771285,0.00043971723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98489714,0.0016756488,0.0013393073,0.0003598451,0.010573032,0.0011550285],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04746996,0.00013296498,0.000376071,0.042718858,0.00026002727,0.20121066,0.0026666725,0.00019757301,0.0002522689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2910027,0.00008601977,0.00013760493,0.095155746,0.00010280332,0.13426659,0.000733844,0.0025044503,0.00001236429],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024983867,0.00018639622,0.8758918,0.000010344203,0.000021941863,0.000041779942,0.0021342423,0.000053966774,0.0029477035,0.0020389534,0.047032587,0.06961527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008109753,0.00031391103,0.9336785,0.00006346305,0.000007911736,0.00018929994,0.004078438,0.0009514299,0.00008944174,0.01264908,0.0470182,0.00014931783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021934418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009394857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24353272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014944428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047391112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023612994","doi":"10.3138/jsp.51.3.02","title":"Nigerian Academics Patronizing Predatory Journals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Promotion (chess); Publication; Mentorship; Public relations; Quality (philosophy); Accreditation; Sociology; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Social science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.7676862134537907,"score_gpt":0.5499434508952649,"score_spread":0.21774276255852587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023612994","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81380624,0.014750497,0.023999736,0.13772693,0.0022549238,0.00017114103,0.00003888106,0.000032855933,0.007218798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856615,0.00068054005,0.005787332,0.0053792805,0.002218787,6.630831e-7,6.935999e-7,0.000024200082,0.00024699682],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97267115,0.00074852456,0.002595597,0.00051779934,0.022685073,0.0007818619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96468353,0.0040193615,0.0030229227,0.0005431521,0.024980996,0.0027500303],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10074971,0.00019233597,0.00060919905,0.034858666,0.00042505225,0.22506872,0.008602949,0.00044466997,0.0007634164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.46563378,0.00013418385,0.00043420354,0.10287018,0.00008968775,0.16440128,0.001298211,0.006170677,0.00010490411],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009253439,0.00007560895,0.47103876,0.00001135814,0.00008347439,0.00019749085,0.0016280931,0.00022789654,0.012840841,0.0006119902,0.26965645,0.2435355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017894555,0.000635363,0.13976976,0.00010491849,0.000029450737,0.0003717592,0.00617461,0.0021140217,0.0015699214,0.015546213,0.8314476,0.0004469398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007452127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000010382877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5617911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026237278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010383717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99676096},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3034184604","doi":"10.3138/jsp.51.4.02","title":"The A to Zoom of Digital Book Events How One Press Managed the Overnight Transition to Virtual Events due to the Coronavirus","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transition (genetics); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Zoom; Swift; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Coronavirus; Process (computing); Media studies; History; Computer science; Engineering; Sociology; Chemistry; Virology; Medicine","score_opus":0.0329949548522928,"score_gpt":0.22681272358588123,"score_spread":0.1938177687335884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034184604","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26981124,0.0006385677,0.07094815,0.6566656,0.00070984184,0.00053514045,0.000036483598,0.000032845914,0.0006221298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97601014,0.00001737387,0.0010533725,0.02189565,0.0005674876,0.0000075657276,0.0000013133649,0.000015558766,0.0004315139],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970221,0.0003017384,0.00049393333,0.00025596455,0.0016147044,0.00031157228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803334,0.00029413443,0.00038736066,0.0004719218,0.00040234873,0.0004108882],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017121983,0.00016289373,0.0002393862,0.00009514671,0.00042920184,0.022400476,0.005104605,0.000066578694,0.000007533556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006917123,0.00008689026,0.0001646859,0.0007108376,0.000018566207,0.0689103,0.0007600686,0.00093345094,0.000015209537],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003406762,0.0010986665,0.0056930254,0.00019664012,0.0019468336,0.00039967545,0.19002351,0.015306629,0.011914844,0.045149866,0.36308378,0.36177978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017472969,0.0023489185,0.14380226,0.0005489948,0.00009445894,0.00012878804,0.0040073306,0.002660137,0.0018972512,0.0026049137,0.8395866,0.00057305355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000316835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015656378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70619893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004938486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001103242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9786144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034242437","doi":"10.3138/jsp.51.4.09","title":"Research in a Department of Medicine in the COVID-19 Era","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Health and Medical Research Impacts","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Political science; Medicine; Medical education; Virology; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Pathology","score_opus":0.47314401537951334,"score_gpt":0.52085940195951,"score_spread":0.04771538657999663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034242437","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2829049,0.001868941,0.00007973096,0.7116531,0.00006101257,0.00033103517,0.0000026667626,0.0000029839193,0.0030955863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8961089,0.00057692855,0.00033593993,0.10221209,0.0007336831,0.0000056893737,0.0000036487772,0.000008795723,0.000014305054],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917781,0.0014088551,0.001142932,0.00016404591,0.00469215,0.000813921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825879,0.0047186376,0.00046052388,0.00037016973,0.002084567,0.00977822],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.058235943,0.00008920775,0.00047138624,0.0010438641,0.00006782024,0.00073138403,0.0007043728,0.00016180812,0.00013179751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.48757872,0.00004941215,0.00006448095,0.002478604,0.00022433848,0.006747928,0.00010032204,0.0068742516,0.000003636395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003425004,0.00069292943,0.12417555,0.0015583294,0.000060318627,0.0069939876,0.023192322,0.00002358048,0.003354621,0.0018472855,0.7952238,0.039452292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.020807832,0.008104977,0.13895757,0.0023230095,0.000034086526,0.00096663454,0.022947026,0.0001373927,0.00014710704,0.003044591,0.8024043,0.00012550561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072698074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007775931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.613204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006269762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011088902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99541694},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3034406398","doi":"10.3138/jsp.51.4.08","title":"The Impact of the COVID-19 Crisis on Scholarly Publishing in China","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; China; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Government (linguistics); Scholarly communication; Political science; Subject (documents); Public relations; Chinese language; Business; Library science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.14330136759272377,"score_gpt":0.41066980062576247,"score_spread":0.2673684330330387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034406398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5120233,0.0013208973,0.000628624,0.47712472,0.0011767491,0.00024627364,0.000043427222,0.000024826857,0.007411178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759039,0.00009925194,0.0002589621,0.022378271,0.0011060219,0.000003762872,0.0000017274205,0.00003760857,0.00021043853],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9809052,0.0032520462,0.003897375,0.0008023605,0.010219214,0.00092380255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96464074,0.015058522,0.0081708245,0.0021263561,0.007592028,0.0024115543],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07926201,0.0004057836,0.0009178844,0.00121595,0.001221921,0.39491123,0.023881325,0.0006985615,0.00016974319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7084569,0.0001911862,0.0010348732,0.007826839,0.00023938433,0.44087136,0.0021121218,0.014227149,0.000016747128],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029328626,0.000074369425,0.26722902,0.0000072651155,0.00009045434,0.000035244786,0.004765557,0.004016636,0.00023127947,0.0023681803,0.7102266,0.0106620975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004076333,0.0006697434,0.6322068,0.00025120578,0.00006429064,0.00028431293,0.016146557,0.0010668589,0.0002442845,0.091129966,0.25320747,0.0006521528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020805125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000091144546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62919486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009400842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032083844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98804706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034723330","doi":"10.3138/jsp.51.4.03","title":"Book Manufacturing in the COVID-19 Era","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"QR Code Applications and Technologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); History; Business; Virology; Medicine","score_opus":0.04911263503416964,"score_gpt":0.26746649069832223,"score_spread":0.2183538556641526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034723330","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02856789,0.0033495855,0.25458246,0.7118853,0.000092571805,0.000097527525,8.855637e-7,0.00008914612,0.0013346359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8708204,0.0001522425,0.027279608,0.101541005,0.00017673435,0.000005416027,2.9526197e-7,0.000005617255,0.000018704017],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868244,0.0000835173,0.0003645834,0.0001573934,0.0005411169,0.00017097685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888146,0.0002221338,0.000280674,0.00032617102,0.00014617381,0.000143395],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019431338,0.000078115496,0.00012696604,0.00022167062,0.00015387121,0.019885214,0.0038938357,0.0000865722,0.000013600773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002511329,0.00005156677,0.000067521025,0.000570771,0.000025485491,0.05100666,0.0003545873,0.0016862993,0.0000062815684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024172245,0.00014599721,0.008777177,0.000057369292,0.000057816724,0.00061679434,0.012095693,0.0011918753,0.0018815252,0.19308978,0.6527419,0.12931986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004709213,0.00008557952,0.006579533,0.000014147897,0.0000048874786,0.00025652177,0.00081946363,0.0007770275,0.0008441742,0.014629436,0.97540075,0.00011758261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001970707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002694993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8422525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008243241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019092913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9811322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034884763","doi":"10.3138/jsp.51.4.05","title":"A Compilation of Short Takes on Working from Home","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Wonder; Work (physics); Space (punctuation); Separation (statistics); Business; Public relations; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Psychology; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.14271019751558733,"score_gpt":0.26317973618148,"score_spread":0.12046953866589266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034884763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96331364,0.0020662965,0.008376249,0.017791672,0.0007532421,0.00008459656,0.00012475972,0.000019633291,0.007469894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937405,0.0000467442,0.0020311002,0.0033695044,0.000767205,4.2789566e-7,0.000009314857,0.000020016023,0.000015212195],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823177,0.000033462493,0.0011326567,0.00020209118,0.00020884948,0.00019116177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978484,0.00031935016,0.0012151301,0.00017044504,0.00022507315,0.00022159448],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019769205,0.00011799093,0.00049343234,0.00044529978,0.00006430799,0.004429395,0.0006037247,0.00015780116,0.0001287036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068350965,0.00012629936,0.00016860779,0.00049682776,0.000021689333,0.021007186,0.00005833263,0.001188953,0.000023036762],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013949265,0.00006110134,0.97541964,0.000021632022,0.00013829989,0.00001779516,0.0030649665,0.0011298931,0.0013547438,0.007643668,0.0047133868,0.006295401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001717347,0.00040610976,0.9055265,0.00036703402,0.000031087857,0.000009917699,0.0005989903,0.002632229,0.00047365212,0.01902984,0.06884895,0.00035831577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007011788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000035145674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06989309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002041047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008061929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035195087","doi":"10.3138/jsp.51.4.04","title":"Continuity of Academic Library Services during the Pandemic The University of Toronto Libraries’ Response","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Robarts Clinical Trials; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Academic library; Library science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Digital library; Special collections; World Wide Web; Sociology; Computer science; Medicine; Art","score_opus":0.02884208285514538,"score_gpt":0.25608549415292226,"score_spread":0.22724341129777686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035195087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93517023,0.0013856475,0.000014786079,0.05916379,0.00014046577,0.00008458117,0.000009100855,0.000018292385,0.0040131253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974797,0.0006124302,0.00017480725,0.0009430436,0.00036784605,6.7628555e-8,5.9501787e-7,0.000004441457,0.0004170998],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977283,0.0008111324,0.00038720906,0.0001044566,0.00080309476,0.00016580256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980423,0.0005728914,0.0008711746,0.00012618449,0.00021295603,0.00017452512],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003642169,0.00006678679,0.0001663069,0.000031994823,0.00058671425,0.0033847876,0.0022349516,0.00014121611,0.0002265808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014418352,0.000042581334,0.00011109201,0.00043370898,0.00033052985,0.15706185,0.00023123182,0.00089610775,9.995208e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014278949,0.000028926215,0.75386417,0.000056442674,0.00005753888,0.000015245011,0.20649554,0.000020956515,0.019070426,0.0115111945,0.0048784665,0.0025731924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046293103,0.00013721565,0.72036874,0.00013189897,0.0000301566,0.0000061281335,0.16797593,0.00002459217,0.0012152322,0.0015171767,0.10803621,0.00009379367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059084146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021036906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15367705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036348712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009945157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042934650","doi":"10.3138/jsp.51.4.06","title":"Rapid Publication in a Time of Crisis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Schedule; Operations research; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; History; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Library science; Computer science; Economics; Management; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.05220221609363068,"score_gpt":0.21873904000377034,"score_spread":0.16653682391013966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042934650","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85055804,0.00323891,0.0022096678,0.07826003,0.00040667778,0.00011513929,0.00008698729,0.000016350345,0.065108195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958292,0.00011296739,0.0013786907,0.0023568852,0.00022114841,0.0000012149281,0.0000046129458,0.000008856993,0.00008639232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983894,0.000034078144,0.0012383595,0.00014555498,0.000059524544,0.00013304701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817616,0.000057986446,0.0012077875,0.00014057283,0.00027931656,0.00013815393],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033471116,0.00007153051,0.00035167733,0.00052952603,0.000044256893,0.003223871,0.00067583704,0.00011475616,0.00075561536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005031449,0.00008111331,0.0001326371,0.00051770406,0.000028464186,0.04674174,0.00007068204,0.00068575615,0.000122012796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114995055,0.00023852149,0.12540801,0.00004913027,0.00012567503,0.00000905728,0.0046757124,0.00023949223,0.0007084874,0.8109496,0.05451279,0.0029685264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004423227,0.0005806541,0.10658188,0.00015558132,0.000029152368,0.00006488872,0.0020524617,0.0018239077,0.0011110973,0.15545794,0.7271257,0.00059352344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028743361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001207689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6726129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000099598394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000068086505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045492774","doi":"10.3138/jsp.51.4.10","title":"Associated Self-Citations and Propagation Luck Two Problems with Citation Counts","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Luck; Skew; Measure (data warehouse); Computer science; Publication; Discounting; Actuarial science; Epistemology; Economics; Advertising; Library science; Data mining; Business; Philosophy; Finance","score_opus":0.037012890942189326,"score_gpt":0.27689491803968375,"score_spread":0.23988202709749443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045492774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6620599,0.00070887414,0.01105914,0.19312738,0.0006311569,0.00048216718,0.000016949964,0.00014791136,0.13176656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951127,0.000066256296,0.0030491557,0.0011957518,0.00040225004,0.0000010792573,0.000004571922,0.000005944138,0.00016226615],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865764,0.00023525117,0.00021670645,0.000072218616,0.000706168,0.0001119944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978999,0.0001613033,0.00037496208,0.000021529071,0.0014071073,0.00013518467],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003577987,0.000047926715,0.00009064288,0.000087206274,0.0003053567,0.005103606,0.00017050687,0.00020933723,0.000030587096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006977267,0.000039412625,0.000020216694,0.0004258069,0.00003850872,0.025550468,0.000011512356,0.0017239837,0.000006169226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012508628,0.00022941484,0.16944608,0.000117903735,0.0005294243,0.000044620727,0.47443715,0.00036618038,0.002399599,0.16725777,0.15071023,0.03433655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00723828,0.0013267769,0.11178647,0.0014673668,0.00060103374,0.00008560899,0.09607537,0.00549947,0.00019720406,0.07349136,0.70103806,0.0011930183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001312264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007023585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55032784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010289622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033446553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046106561","doi":"10.3138/jsp.51.4.11","title":"Why Would a Professor Self-Publish a Book?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Publishing; Chose; Library science; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.0693201721835693,"score_gpt":0.24833134211095223,"score_spread":0.17901116992738292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046106561","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067972764,0.008576619,0.00035046987,0.7833197,0.002771727,0.0003549931,0.00004157469,0.00047954515,0.13613258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79756355,0.0002891505,0.0049729445,0.18474285,0.00944373,0.000017980357,0.000043547905,0.00013322257,0.0027929964],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99596673,0.0004978978,0.0012068425,0.00029379746,0.0015659103,0.0004687911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99251014,0.0002594887,0.0013551859,0.0004985227,0.0047290986,0.00064753694],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004489058,0.00027468606,0.000491252,0.0005277389,0.0008026235,0.18155812,0.0031918543,0.0003958036,0.0008706809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01140328,0.00023272749,0.00032285016,0.00038160066,0.000103922706,0.3377886,0.00044218975,0.0080758175,0.00003648562],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075659766,0.0001657352,0.00076957414,0.000042485408,0.00020495395,0.000030240923,0.051181074,0.0000028136521,0.0002187196,0.048168696,0.8966836,0.002456465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010402327,0.0002716579,0.00028947048,0.00010554079,0.0000885185,0.00003757766,0.0073222294,0.00009470974,0.000041918265,0.0018983237,0.988539,0.00027086452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000116796764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000054458036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7295908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018047777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045800582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046186314","doi":"10.3138/jsp.51.4.01","title":"Introduction to the Special Section","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Special section; Computer science; Engineering; Engineering physics","score_opus":0.02787006991333799,"score_gpt":0.2723774517042963,"score_spread":0.2445073817909583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046186314","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6746946,0.00043376177,0.019179,0.2739445,0.027372696,0.00014578649,0.000004809363,0.000036448982,0.0041884123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6295693,0.000088678826,0.0014181272,0.016982418,0.35097125,0.0000030503872,0.0000037106884,0.000037017155,0.0009264138],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983202,0.0001944641,0.00049185334,0.0001975523,0.0005821196,0.0002137858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998196,0.00007321407,0.0003894598,0.00020350832,0.0009237961,0.00021404037],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025562164,0.00010919515,0.00017606484,0.00018709937,0.0002038266,0.008144799,0.0006402314,0.0001534235,0.0006214627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018172958,0.000080356396,0.00013394954,0.00065992976,0.000019303869,0.0142085245,0.000043919306,0.0020166968,0.00009296572],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003882903,0.000044638993,0.0015958914,0.0000029514372,0.00009567797,0.000016541431,0.046381325,0.00038098375,0.0014003946,0.0016767484,0.9185969,0.029419605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051291985,0.00032114112,0.0145184435,0.000008698504,0.000030195548,0.00013194169,0.016668279,0.000029796796,0.0000027669782,0.000317547,0.9673614,0.00009689767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003089077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024272149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32359856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000111634596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006951698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048398151","doi":"10.3138/jsp.51.4.07","title":"How May the Pandemic Impact Scholarly Communities That Already Face Discrimination?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Pandemic; Face (sociological concept); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Social science; Law; Medicine; Outbreak; Virology","score_opus":0.17958345658381902,"score_gpt":0.2988875279672075,"score_spread":0.1193040713833885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048398151","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7220752,0.010067589,0.011125112,0.25173363,0.00084583764,0.00028120278,0.00019330803,0.0000711557,0.003606928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98815876,0.0007226581,0.00037863787,0.009557752,0.00066573353,0.000003724197,0.000014404182,0.000051178937,0.00044715317],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753714,0.00022567343,0.0010024582,0.00025098692,0.0004523887,0.0005313576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955006,0.0007576189,0.0020617463,0.00053624104,0.0006637948,0.00047998579],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067973165,0.0003033516,0.0006687402,0.0005612064,0.0005179603,0.0716145,0.0025594376,0.0003002053,0.00014142059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014579516,0.00023154674,0.00042035614,0.00073722174,0.0001210279,0.15465353,0.0003945894,0.00449736,0.00004467303],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008579601,0.00006824545,0.93555963,0.000053259784,0.00034998247,0.000019479294,0.018920181,0.00034004648,0.00023435344,0.009765856,0.030379465,0.0042236885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003533845,0.0006779718,0.62514794,0.00025199,0.00011787787,0.00029784028,0.034672532,0.001699536,0.00011112357,0.023086997,0.30948147,0.00092088565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006483242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005146523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31041172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000668271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002748724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977993},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3094805407","doi":"10.3138/jsp.52.1.02","title":"Thinking about Starting an Interdisciplinary Journal: The Medical Humanities as a Case in Point","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Innovations in Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Field (mathematics); Interdisciplinarity; Point (geometry); Sociology; Epistemology; Medical humanities; Humanities; Engineering ethics; Social science; Philosophy; Political science; Engineering; Medicine; Medical education; Law","score_opus":0.05343142272926686,"score_gpt":0.3705151887669351,"score_spread":0.31708376603766825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094805407","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73395294,0.0005839025,0.00068321096,0.26157176,0.00080669735,0.000103170074,4.36661e-7,0.000019072339,0.0022788192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9455115,0.000036268517,0.0044306577,0.04577556,0.004169584,0.000002523841,0.0000037510868,0.00003196124,0.000038188635],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950197,0.00035713732,0.0015863135,0.00016934506,0.002539169,0.00032837156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956865,0.000250742,0.0010901404,0.00023675364,0.002292351,0.0004435702],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.016749825,0.00015495562,0.0003667168,0.0005870291,0.00072332344,0.011058139,0.0009180266,0.00023279968,0.0005225644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04859013,0.00010169328,0.0001344675,0.0008979956,0.00013553731,0.03396479,0.00038431791,0.008342456,0.000005855787],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009892338,0.0011255551,0.029943839,0.00038034914,0.00047256408,0.083116114,0.4244718,0.00011996575,0.0011498233,0.013873228,0.12853086,0.31582668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0068202107,0.00317526,0.02006433,0.0060190195,0.00033307573,0.24566826,0.63486034,0.006316643,0.00016972602,0.040439878,0.035578653,0.00055457174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004438711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002799143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3152721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040176322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011979886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99394536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094933057","doi":"10.3138/jsp.52.1.01","title":"Branding Spin-Off Scholarly Journals: Transmuting Symbolic Capital into Economic Capital","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Prestige; Symbolic capital; Capital (architecture); Brand names; Economics; Sociology; Business; Marketing; History; Social science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.41356925951913204,"score_gpt":0.49444687481835053,"score_spread":0.0808776152992185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094933057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9362603,0.013574108,0.0063261455,0.03859217,0.0021225354,0.00018226258,0.000025828573,0.00003437593,0.0028822848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99119204,0.0007807268,0.003828799,0.001377404,0.002627855,0.0000017038006,0.000001986485,0.000050298084,0.00013919438],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97730964,0.00088042946,0.003816291,0.0009792516,0.015743338,0.0012710529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97641206,0.0038975514,0.0029762173,0.0006806119,0.012782716,0.0032508268],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.081208214,0.0004063883,0.0011157347,0.045783035,0.0010938796,0.38480434,0.00935072,0.00049132016,0.0010934096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21422821,0.0003109451,0.0009110373,0.055435617,0.00018003325,0.2684317,0.0011196017,0.006642287,0.0003548753],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032291154,0.00030412248,0.42947626,0.000049205137,0.00043614538,0.0007560959,0.019517861,0.0012508811,0.03519237,0.0035622187,0.03861015,0.47052178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01917906,0.0059255096,0.48460644,0.001046644,0.00036917045,0.004096103,0.08834781,0.023033326,0.009910591,0.10539662,0.2540143,0.004074398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014989925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020256859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46644738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008551513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015898688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3096268605","doi":"10.3138/jsp.52.1.03","title":"An Analysis of Spam from Predatory Publications in Library and Information Science","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Spam and Phishing Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Legitimacy; Library science; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.018380973637281108,"score_gpt":0.23019922019318742,"score_spread":0.2118182465559063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3096268605","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9297641,0.00015749714,0.056817103,0.012169039,0.00016900331,0.000044381235,0.000010516608,0.000037671536,0.00083070516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790519,0.000043904416,0.01980329,0.0010122111,0.00007900458,5.950322e-7,0.000005655858,0.0000024417236,0.0000010098847],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842924,0.00008422004,0.0005372016,0.0001523004,0.0006813673,0.000115675655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983198,0.000101160564,0.0005988017,0.000249751,0.00047526928,0.00025522037],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015785918,0.000064419204,0.00018438615,0.0019823997,0.00009760828,0.025003849,0.0016154262,0.0000729399,0.000012521517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018874671,0.00005838351,0.000051998224,0.00590669,0.000052436382,0.64915556,0.00021398313,0.00059607165,5.100981e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041728406,0.000096776304,0.8676129,0.000019278625,0.00015455578,0.000003761286,0.014657111,0.0030411228,0.015266056,0.06061628,0.00042118158,0.038069274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025694646,0.00010306165,0.87973636,0.000019715835,0.000041471896,0.0000034097513,0.00038521676,0.11443494,0.0012825605,0.0007589316,0.002900043,0.00007733768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004793711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000031239924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6241517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031156138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031330675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9760083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119460267","doi":"10.3138/jsp.52.2.04","title":"Scholarship, Money, and Prose: Behind the Scenes at an Academic Journal by Michael Chibnik.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Art; Media studies; Sociology; History; Literature; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05501574853513693,"score_gpt":0.26826488417916505,"score_spread":0.21324913564402811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119460267","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9039731,0.039989293,0.000034196382,0.05063608,0.0013515602,0.000107474894,0.000036300164,0.000038224665,0.0038337477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98335814,0.0024853246,0.001118511,0.0034878433,0.003472721,0.0000044491635,0.000041790594,0.00006472676,0.0059664813],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950541,0.0012693526,0.0012398836,0.00031383135,0.0016033308,0.00051950203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99300534,0.00040504627,0.0014640279,0.00064102403,0.003903111,0.0005814389],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0120646935,0.00030025354,0.00042781534,0.0003767592,0.0033183321,0.15769565,0.0025434105,0.00035637282,0.00025035668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007992551,0.00021170404,0.0002022407,0.0001886641,0.00031261586,0.21587001,0.0006791007,0.009733679,0.000008050327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050309405,0.0009653432,0.13127996,0.00013552027,0.0010662758,0.0002754494,0.19904143,0.000040334442,0.07440053,0.054192353,0.45449734,0.0836024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002075319,0.00031576134,0.023634035,0.0005123653,0.00022658933,0.003796848,0.017734967,0.000071785806,0.0012009286,0.016978819,0.932865,0.0005875583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000638695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025461122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4783677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027182934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048217297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979792},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W3119778649","doi":"10.3138/jsp.52.2.03","title":"An Analysis of Recently Retracted Articles by Authors Affiliated with Hospitals in Mainland China","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mainland China; China; Impact factor; Mainland; Web of science; China mainland; Medicine; Library science; MEDLINE; Political science; Family medicine; History; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.014507027765983834,"score_gpt":0.2830212244733336,"score_spread":0.2685141967073498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119778649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98455805,0.0005781804,0.00040238848,0.011926736,0.00016811134,0.00005118541,0.000027156999,0.000012092495,0.0022760956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973341,0.0002603263,0.001851236,0.00021368876,0.00012101584,4.4356062e-7,0.000022073524,0.000008293592,0.00018881322],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962308,0.0011333788,0.0007336836,0.00019012197,0.0013880746,0.000323972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99665534,0.00027231852,0.0007890538,0.00015629965,0.00182631,0.0003006768],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012320641,0.00010767602,0.00044375114,0.0006499685,0.00020418735,0.0052887946,0.0006309003,0.0007723847,0.00023752992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011403499,0.00008936764,0.0001253108,0.0038784915,0.000112717586,0.035155192,0.000029650624,0.004360888,5.892834e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012998345,0.00024715438,0.9560087,0.000008170479,0.00050899055,0.00012815496,0.025811376,0.0002785632,0.006679231,0.00141686,0.0045233057,0.0042595486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008425734,0.00019883356,0.94976074,0.0002408236,0.0004927264,0.000015207485,0.03804759,0.00052565744,0.0026786586,0.0018017517,0.0051495307,0.00024588837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023520603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00209622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029866397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019932634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057599205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99793607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119992070","doi":"10.3138/jsp.52.2.02","title":"Chinese PhD Students’ Perceptions of Predatory Journals: A Survey Study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Perception; Psychology; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.6534216837444228,"score_gpt":0.595377689547528,"score_spread":0.058043994196894766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119992070","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916221,0.0034360709,0.0014409496,0.001072899,0.0013529226,0.00014783372,0.000064314874,0.000006202749,0.00085672596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969657,0.00032628066,0.0010764886,0.00013250498,0.0003462059,0.0000014422282,0.000002162602,0.000016582073,0.0011326225],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9547205,0.0038648313,0.0033972582,0.00061068777,0.036796622,0.000610116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9073197,0.008828923,0.0027544266,0.0011806246,0.07880252,0.001113802],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2120601,0.00019674032,0.0008274937,0.04992243,0.0004026839,0.15080282,0.007732893,0.00021335966,0.0016346242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5093609,0.00012972153,0.0004517955,0.15354869,0.00009899506,0.08244356,0.0020598506,0.0029429207,0.000031415893],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041387397,0.0015244136,0.97025084,0.0000038802955,0.00013189547,0.0001435841,0.001012175,0.000045306315,0.0017078338,0.000011978073,0.012934466,0.012192258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001301521,0.00036932918,0.985883,0.000036753943,0.000019672481,0.00016131393,0.009832975,0.000049081173,0.000042494816,0.0010139158,0.001165493,0.00012443341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016114066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018914994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29730082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024066065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001401602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99935734},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3120462291","doi":"10.3138/jsp.52.2.01","title":"Book Publishing in the Humanities and Social Sciences in Australia, Part One: Understanding Institutional Pressures and the Funding Context","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Autonomy; Context (archaeology); Political science; Face (sociological concept); Public relations; Library science; Sociology; Social science; Media studies; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.8039142264450041,"score_gpt":0.5148172773623888,"score_spread":0.2890969490826153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120462291","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80588794,0.035409465,0.0005710945,0.14756298,0.0008694164,0.00023271401,0.000016826461,0.0000055629666,0.0094439965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99382657,0.00045576866,0.0001459397,0.0046287654,0.000298277,0.000002843463,8.546396e-7,0.0000041334474,0.0006368645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875082,0.0014653279,0.001138876,0.00039522204,0.008959367,0.0005330376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98376274,0.012264878,0.0008088427,0.00021563677,0.0028566737,0.000091253714],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12076388,0.00012605124,0.0003736136,0.016028915,0.002123834,0.35070485,0.0025719486,0.00015830698,0.00012493368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10634892,0.000069262576,0.000100026824,0.036808666,0.001426346,0.109387,0.00081045646,0.0023429228,9.881434e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116856034,0.00014109495,0.29419395,0.00002670738,0.000056326317,0.00020140839,0.01607224,0.00009540704,0.00009963885,0.57416534,0.104439475,0.010391538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0051115993,0.00013578682,0.32404953,0.00029966971,0.00003042211,0.0004912617,0.12256405,0.0006424734,0.000043426266,0.15845056,0.3878639,0.00031730608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033946574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005374914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4157148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026003394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071035983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124861990","doi":"10.1353/scp.2005.0008","title":"Scholarship at the Crossroads: The Journal of Markets &amp; Morality Case Study","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Digital Platforms and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Morality; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.06066803090988128,"score_gpt":0.2648703202421535,"score_spread":0.20420228933227225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124861990","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9855901,0.0006405766,0.000034338733,0.0078047384,0.00086798845,0.00017004798,0.000002181956,0.000010321987,0.004879707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926974,0.00001910581,0.00016453568,0.0031002145,0.0036030137,8.408681e-7,0.0000012908453,0.0000273333,0.00038624983],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706644,0.00004188009,0.0014565072,0.00013923114,0.0009252453,0.00037071796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944176,0.0003005973,0.0027650832,0.00042058856,0.0020288252,0.00006732233],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021650055,0.00021521864,0.00037746792,0.00035255522,0.0008773611,0.086329795,0.0016616894,0.00011518467,0.00022016291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051204944,0.000114989096,0.0002916402,0.0004912015,0.00009730618,0.2858357,0.00063477043,0.0022248523,0.00005364075],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001325034,0.0014530615,0.7503629,0.00010537028,0.0010085828,0.0017203089,0.003083148,0.002610964,0.00025179153,0.0027070707,0.12879601,0.106575765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005861502,0.00018123141,0.26359776,0.0002748196,0.0007454614,0.019067453,0.048620015,0.00027213467,0.00003445521,0.010632053,0.6499675,0.00074562756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027069674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012331296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52117145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023862714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011802569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96659994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152916307","doi":"10.3138/jsp.52.3.03","title":"Do Journals’ Author Guidelines Tell Us What We Need to Know about Plagiarism?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Copying; Publication; Originality; Citation; Plagiarism detection; Readability; Allowance (engineering); Academic integrity; Work (physics); Computer science; Psychology; Library science; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Information retrieval; Creativity","score_opus":0.08486452607422508,"score_gpt":0.37348253959160543,"score_spread":0.28861801351738037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152916307","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14510994,0.07840099,0.0041822633,0.744422,0.009021546,0.00018911525,0.000016036995,0.00006410902,0.018593982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47820687,0.170535,0.13438919,0.09530816,0.057687897,0.0000142424915,0.000021716323,0.00025395534,0.06358298],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99222016,0.0013063948,0.0018074703,0.00036728918,0.0034617074,0.00083694566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837064,0.00091467786,0.0012353021,0.0003102455,0.012587857,0.0012455217],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.030573709,0.00027434775,0.00062254845,0.00078329834,0.0013481246,0.09719438,0.0021311338,0.0021217307,0.001338456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08114854,0.00024372086,0.00042076397,0.0018320661,0.00012417826,0.12465417,0.00031182033,0.013556784,0.000088545086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006867104,0.000087316505,0.01001246,0.00001922162,0.00014569685,0.000441258,0.027530832,0.00016158022,0.002738946,0.008843529,0.847115,0.10283553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004349037,0.00005334834,0.0015751086,0.0019125984,0.00006985274,0.00027900393,0.06439025,0.000021244108,0.0005398755,0.008057125,0.92237073,0.00029595464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005750722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031197537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64911383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004864698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024732281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995196},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"reporting","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3154296573","doi":"10.3138/jsp.52.3.01","title":"The Stages of Revising a Dissertation into a Book","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Optimal distinctiveness theory; Patience; Scope (computer science); Compassion; Key (lock); Process (computing); Sociology; Humanism; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015758946513066557,"score_gpt":0.2759075128804646,"score_spread":0.260148566367398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154296573","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07432634,0.008141201,0.9002885,0.0116735725,0.00064035814,0.000056710458,2.1350813e-7,0.000029522545,0.004843545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7502201,0.00031952836,0.2472707,0.0013658116,0.00025901085,8.019607e-7,9.2042586e-7,0.00001137566,0.00055175606],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794716,0.00010828557,0.0009333608,0.00008849342,0.00077789265,0.00014480545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947585,0.0003661831,0.0015063705,0.00026348018,0.0030235022,0.00008200549],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040834206,0.000076647455,0.00017873074,0.00015864367,0.000374852,0.029312585,0.0011087038,0.000051762614,0.0000066662305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076763085,0.00005335618,0.00009801181,0.00051594304,0.00002412578,0.091775715,0.00020145367,0.0005712246,0.0000012103652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017979934,0.00013505793,0.003741494,0.00079551066,0.0001601852,0.00004516874,0.06701654,0.0005234835,0.011022069,0.3082871,0.014411872,0.5938435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040583075,0.0005650964,0.02090557,0.01027361,0.00016120066,0.0018178002,0.03416732,0.15094467,0.10930055,0.39271256,0.2736703,0.001423043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000035139997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000015673388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6758938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053288535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040807744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97169507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154919336","doi":"10.3138/jsp.52.3.02","title":"Against Using the Book Proposal to Rethink Your Book: Why and How to Work <i>on</i> Your Book Instead","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Process (computing); Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05819193353882601,"score_gpt":0.28206693661010146,"score_spread":0.22387500307127545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154919336","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20755993,0.07432127,0.0006879634,0.5849955,0.0036434962,0.00068313995,0.00005571711,0.00010529759,0.12794769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40647054,0.0015470841,0.008989959,0.46064928,0.018986432,0.000029940173,0.0000157609,0.00027575743,0.103035256],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996645,0.00040093588,0.0006285156,0.00038941624,0.001421981,0.00051415595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962135,0.00021034192,0.0005667855,0.00048026568,0.002168692,0.00036043802],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033309164,0.00033061169,0.0005691004,0.00047501878,0.0013053287,0.05259873,0.0008822447,0.00011699085,0.0003195635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044186725,0.00022163248,0.0002826017,0.00034055935,0.00018525265,0.03543023,0.0005704234,0.0020135753,0.00001249066],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010682382,0.00011843884,0.0006448748,0.000036584013,0.00082933175,0.0005533877,0.093727045,0.0001821259,0.00077153,0.015343268,0.8793207,0.008365896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040674937,0.00014337008,0.0001350975,0.00072819326,0.0002357613,0.00006080165,0.064427435,0.000011935766,0.00025479603,0.00035250676,0.9329179,0.00032546368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000040653744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020015103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19891061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018642798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034358917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3156188181","doi":"10.3138/jsp.52.3.04","title":"Book Publishing in the Humanities and Social Sciences in Australia, Part Two: Author Motivation, Audience, and Publishing Knowledge","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Reputation; Publication; Sociology; Public relations; Media studies; Social science; Political science; Advertising; Business","score_opus":0.20457391895813953,"score_gpt":0.32264896037722224,"score_spread":0.1180750414190827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3156188181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80853987,0.020241592,0.00001535304,0.11351896,0.0011964916,0.00019628151,0.00002744354,0.000041306896,0.056222707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860166,0.00024076886,0.00031681955,0.007896976,0.0016915764,0.000012462434,0.000025741816,0.000022422157,0.003776643],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995057,0.0014171312,0.0012853468,0.00041157086,0.0012529807,0.00057599554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99479085,0.001492034,0.0009239189,0.0003014109,0.002417339,0.0000744442],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021751404,0.0002618279,0.00045048274,0.0013427344,0.0023090234,0.43085563,0.0020217632,0.0002341243,0.00013739732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018058915,0.00020818978,0.00010239941,0.0008401139,0.0007623839,0.39263102,0.0005667981,0.0046485793,0.0000013868676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002530977,0.00026055318,0.052293077,0.00008527223,0.000050074013,0.00006518991,0.25277647,0.000014577781,0.00007610265,0.34062907,0.34788468,0.0058396226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013423797,0.00008478688,0.061983194,0.000458581,0.000032289296,0.00013310518,0.07331526,0.00007193747,0.000010919909,0.013864159,0.8483872,0.0003161899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011245742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005511577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5005025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002149207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006088154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3156482924","doi":"10.3138/jsp.52.3.05","title":"Reassembling Scholarly Communications: Histories, Infrastructures, and Global Politics of Open Access by Martin Paul Eve and Jonathan Gray","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gray (unit); Politics; Media studies; Sociology; Political science; Art history; History; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.09047836939883004,"score_gpt":0.3372489112101505,"score_spread":0.24677054181132047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3156482924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8189431,0.08614214,0.00020003374,0.056542516,0.0010194551,0.00028685867,0.00054614875,0.00005632257,0.03626347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921515,0.0014794016,0.0038870005,0.0013008376,0.0003093109,0.0000048137067,0.00012614683,0.00002911278,0.0007118761],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964645,0.00079291384,0.0012232775,0.00028646787,0.00090211787,0.00033073785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99123776,0.00041937805,0.0014993969,0.0010391334,0.0054360544,0.0003682525],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050002085,0.00024204364,0.0005431737,0.00031268378,0.0011895036,0.22908849,0.005134365,0.00022917868,0.00006810337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011580254,0.00022727445,0.00009496473,0.00038553283,0.0003534431,0.26133123,0.0038633042,0.0025892549,3.2635546e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010739092,0.00037413684,0.194163,0.00016442701,0.00044039948,0.000032288914,0.015570013,0.0000017287465,0.0023958343,0.6005582,0.16977839,0.016414175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018546107,0.00013451175,0.037919097,0.0005599116,0.00019347356,0.00032873888,0.0094831325,0.000056357465,0.00014237927,0.106095955,0.8427654,0.00046645704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024091785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009935837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.672987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034617004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082045223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173307563","doi":"10.3138/jsp.52.4.03","title":"Testing and Refining Scholarly Communications Workflows and Work Habits for the Digital Age","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Studio; Scholarship; Workflow; Sociology; The arts; Work (physics); Engineering ethics; Computer science; Engineering; Visual arts; Political science; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.1934840526461856,"score_gpt":0.3460646844795895,"score_spread":0.1525806318334039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3173307563","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15513179,0.046247333,0.3798067,0.39491683,0.0011385442,0.0006270142,0.000032419794,0.00016500826,0.02193438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5113988,0.00089743035,0.4856787,0.0010981223,0.00023286999,0.000010902229,0.0000045797433,0.000018428673,0.0006601995],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978217,0.00026143,0.00050144835,0.00028547147,0.00082414784,0.00030580128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98821366,0.0077566174,0.0006368758,0.0012422485,0.0019183852,0.00023222598],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008990778,0.000117225645,0.00018383862,0.00024784816,0.000942332,0.4597871,0.0042610588,0.00007308706,8.416776e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0997126,0.00008866288,0.0000536077,0.0012705042,0.00010168775,0.5668991,0.0040590498,0.0020366525,7.00887e-7],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024405908,0.000085206535,0.10939284,0.000045164437,0.00021870188,0.00016689594,0.000698585,0.000025605752,0.0007420161,0.06524553,0.003586264,0.8197688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016379011,0.00023284051,0.36848316,0.0009521185,0.00010062127,0.0006622918,0.0014629503,0.0025103549,0.00004430854,0.009573675,0.6139347,0.00040508914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013043126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011253953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8193637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005269658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021859298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9078709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175950036","doi":"10.3138/jsp.52.4.01","title":"The Role of the Editor of an Academic Publication Blog","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Wikis in Education and Collaboration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social media; Public relations; Sociology; Scholarly communication; Microblogging; Media studies; Political science; Publishing; Law","score_opus":0.016836899976392036,"score_gpt":0.31414508704997096,"score_spread":0.2973081870735789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175950036","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81528246,0.0024354528,0.000031043925,0.14263277,0.011893017,0.00012213191,0.000005958355,0.0000098933615,0.027587242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99086064,0.00019101173,0.00042276346,0.00038043346,0.00744538,0.0000019309814,0.0000015990076,0.0000049627824,0.0006912922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974844,0.00062765944,0.0005285213,0.0000731631,0.0011643603,0.00012188803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913523,0.00027426152,0.0011244473,0.00021482793,0.0069396542,0.000094468574],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006737553,0.0000430989,0.000096266966,0.000081258455,0.00053329003,0.0053107305,0.0010743927,0.00016363351,0.00004535644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021155585,0.000027669716,0.00007087927,0.0011090263,0.00013479797,0.029507825,0.00005802981,0.00090338045,7.022924e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005271739,0.00037068294,0.09927787,0.000015516158,0.0001053774,6.3247705e-7,0.047281142,0.000038591665,0.040815033,0.5196159,0.17953873,0.1128878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016549898,0.00002553214,0.03224434,0.000046087265,0.000023239734,0.000003949255,0.075367324,0.0000184558,0.006093683,0.024290243,0.86167055,0.000051091436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010475338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020486592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6821318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000112920614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023127988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176320011","doi":"10.3138/jsp.52.4.02","title":"Career Difficulties That Chinese Academic Journal Editors Face and Their Causes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Salary; Promotion (chess); Publishing; Face (sociological concept); Quality (philosophy); China; Work (physics); Job satisfaction; Psychology; Public relations; Medical education; Sociology; Management; Political science; Social science; Social psychology; Medicine; Engineering; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.038997934443210064,"score_gpt":0.28689025261719453,"score_spread":0.24789231817398447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176320011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9325745,0.0038142991,0.00015623138,0.0548653,0.005823467,0.000042714517,0.000007324247,0.000019440084,0.0026967411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98343366,0.001686761,0.00053843926,0.003598838,0.009487566,4.704583e-7,0.0000022340487,0.000008269271,0.0012437719],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997407,0.00029814834,0.0005738932,0.00010947838,0.0012826972,0.0003287472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968537,0.00032902567,0.00072239735,0.00009948539,0.0015301979,0.00046516134],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004069525,0.00012917983,0.00023046412,0.0002953113,0.0010615097,0.044364817,0.00085495436,0.00021512773,0.00013063461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007657444,0.000082717954,0.00012977645,0.00066205,0.00016939099,0.4474592,0.00015498522,0.0022662012,0.0000033619413],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023439246,0.00004301373,0.5339906,0.000021548503,0.00009445137,0.000071865376,0.25121847,0.00006827799,0.0010917261,0.0029239766,0.19438963,0.016062956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005094323,0.000047780133,0.18099548,0.00017370912,0.000013101928,0.00042373105,0.19596806,0.000017889954,0.00035084516,0.0029915834,0.61829805,0.00021035533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038780385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008623414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4239084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000975384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009000316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98456424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176743654","doi":"10.3138/jsp.52.4.04","title":"Multilingual Scholars’ Experiences in Publishing in the Social Sciences and Humanities","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Socioeconomic Development in MENA","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Discipline; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Sociology; Library science; Public relations; Social science; Medical education; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.11636618231197543,"score_gpt":0.35882834924535006,"score_spread":0.24246216693337463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176743654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94296324,0.0017471919,0.0000037445427,0.026069745,0.00087977725,0.00007974532,9.904924e-7,0.000010699559,0.028244847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994019,0.0001875374,0.0018514295,0.0029521664,0.0008205249,0.000008289369,8.108137e-7,0.000008118421,0.00015215286],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.995609,0.0013009037,0.0008105945,0.0002722737,0.001497516,0.00050970935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974549,0.001130644,0.0005174553,0.00009122025,0.0007295878,0.00007623478],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.030500613,0.00013060888,0.0002867305,0.0006087694,0.0016639511,0.09941923,0.0016678055,0.00023402617,0.000093981325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02493483,0.00010905492,0.000074444426,0.0011649816,0.0006891998,0.1369406,0.00021740764,0.0022818132,0.0000012656908],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007807512,0.000065776876,0.23848297,0.0000076426895,0.000012455447,0.00012138626,0.7327975,0.000004553764,0.000059850805,0.015179478,0.0014228284,0.011837733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005563685,0.000015087172,0.10621661,0.00009949134,0.0000047211956,0.000031433177,0.86952955,0.000003994093,0.000046649897,0.0056515657,0.017706906,0.00013765001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086501695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002153872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13673201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038718188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017583576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177002457","doi":"10.3138/jsp.52.4.05","title":"The Internationalization of Chinese English-Language Humanities and Social Science Journals","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internationalization; Publishing; Context (archaeology); Chinese language; Social science; Scopus; Library science; Independence (probability theory); Citation; Political science; Humanities; Sociology; History; Business; Law; Linguistics; Art; Statistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.3766237174427705,"score_gpt":0.5214296935725878,"score_spread":0.14480597612981733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177002457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9773024,0.007121388,0.0012258383,0.0044302046,0.0012460935,0.00003579996,0.00000925096,0.000003344721,0.00862573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977211,0.0003969532,0.0004667952,0.00021204894,0.0005608221,3.5065122e-7,5.877621e-7,0.000005183524,0.000636203],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98403054,0.00033859574,0.0011606126,0.00022383392,0.0139597505,0.00028668545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94222903,0.003933757,0.0014657668,0.00024230074,0.051975895,0.00015322548],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07876782,0.000083058796,0.00024436266,0.02049959,0.0009991993,0.16382742,0.003180064,0.00007599081,0.00010979765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3731158,0.00004627178,0.00013180531,0.05665412,0.000446689,0.067421444,0.00095528073,0.00093576644,0.0000011531877],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055231783,0.0001705745,0.6709627,0.000015118804,0.000086849024,0.00008102615,0.029011572,0.000025266922,0.034046415,0.03487774,0.009990748,0.22067676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012440145,0.00015038077,0.84735906,0.00007161159,0.000015766207,0.00029106662,0.05346568,0.0006470265,0.0040422897,0.04806052,0.044448126,0.00020442593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009679425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008814577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29434797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012934847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008348691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9906022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205196965","doi":"10.3138/jsp.53.1.02","title":"What I’ve Learned about Writing a Second Book","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Writing and Publishing","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Academic writing; Technical writing; Sociology; Professional writing; Service (business); Public relations; Psychology; Management; Pedagogy; Political science; Higher education; Computer science; Law; Business; Marketing","score_opus":0.05098546888973252,"score_gpt":0.2628201561627698,"score_spread":0.2118346872730373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205196965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48171982,0.109322876,0.00014238642,0.097691044,0.010240489,0.00013978335,0.00003608165,0.00018352408,0.300524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86440784,0.0023100195,0.0015992419,0.030152222,0.024955843,0.0000048313905,0.000038067377,0.00012914975,0.07640276],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99638736,0.00032093722,0.0012305888,0.00030706744,0.0012041064,0.0005499445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937807,0.0005612645,0.0010849242,0.00026467728,0.003957323,0.00035114514],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006020434,0.0002324745,0.00047239067,0.00041596012,0.0008113883,0.21020184,0.00095625746,0.00028795443,0.005462541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072248033,0.00021529135,0.0003269504,0.00019306346,0.000117906864,0.29944327,0.0002526532,0.0050863363,0.00002968473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057829835,0.00014501232,0.0026011756,0.00021483096,0.00032450695,0.00081331574,0.07609143,0.00002253858,0.0016843885,0.12817143,0.73060435,0.059269197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007020796,0.000050578506,0.00031577793,0.0010411852,0.00004846125,0.00034443618,0.09533217,0.000021987382,0.00027305592,0.0043012877,0.89731556,0.00025343048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026566187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009078463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38268805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015099712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005463432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99720895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207564828","doi":"10.3138/jsp.53.1.04","title":"Why I Review Unimpressive Books","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transferability; Value (mathematics); Field (mathematics); Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Positive economics; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06422463688682319,"score_gpt":0.2639434441633077,"score_spread":0.19971880727648456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207564828","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014871153,0.2857678,0.00026904204,0.25824064,0.0034790589,0.00016966149,0.000033501823,0.00010616311,0.43706298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5953463,0.05012967,0.008693975,0.28587455,0.012492712,0.000025149491,0.00021391595,0.00022637492,0.046997413],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696666,0.0005861942,0.00093585567,0.00018043203,0.0010601584,0.00027071082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99014014,0.00029041624,0.0010579411,0.0006147599,0.0076497206,0.0002470453],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004533967,0.00016480243,0.0004114059,0.00027682775,0.0005510108,0.09385987,0.0015825515,0.000115969604,0.0011720627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013937145,0.00013885516,0.00027827398,0.00019977872,0.00008773871,0.1734703,0.00030271185,0.0030702315,0.000015172106],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000105546105,0.00009574934,0.00029124893,0.00016641578,0.00012119048,0.00010557206,0.004147673,0.0000018000409,0.00039240404,0.08661514,0.89686865,0.011183631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038379064,0.000050318988,0.00023791785,0.0022713838,0.000096486656,0.00019703753,0.0020244876,0.000004280942,0.00011425709,0.00509879,0.98935866,0.00016258552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001024442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012448533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5804751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012659229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004883065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207572234","doi":"10.3138/jsp.53.1.06","title":"<i>Book Wars: The Digital Revolution in Publishing</i> by John B. Thompson","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Digital Revolution; Media studies; Art; Sociology; Political science; Literature; Law","score_opus":0.013983122616554851,"score_gpt":0.20303322470863622,"score_spread":0.18905010209208137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207572234","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075021565,0.07409601,0.0328002,0.46104625,0.004495329,0.00035883597,0.000021536742,0.0002684878,0.3518918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89823836,0.0012124043,0.010115606,0.041875545,0.001577288,0.0000112780535,0.000036949627,0.00005861855,0.046873923],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969311,0.00018124148,0.00078723097,0.00029876066,0.0014307951,0.00037092107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99753404,0.00038634113,0.00056043215,0.0003523849,0.0009435342,0.00022324205],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021865605,0.00016408318,0.00024135332,0.0004380513,0.00025705143,0.23045705,0.0024482443,0.0001669785,0.00004403236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069042346,0.000118611446,0.00015685818,0.0024560615,0.00003929911,0.4570191,0.0007268147,0.0017139288,0.000007770342],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016580309,0.00009668806,0.010121974,0.0000074833747,0.000030070103,0.00010330963,0.0008922194,0.000024893863,0.00016953023,0.0028584346,0.94414663,0.04153219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065929565,0.000048015158,0.0061206454,0.000118097414,0.0000035987944,0.00029430562,0.00037774717,0.00025568475,0.0005143874,0.0039827237,0.987457,0.00016850425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000080342725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000036895822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8232168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022409554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081481686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82655126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207822332","doi":"10.3138/jsp.53.1.03","title":"Author Choice of Journal Type Based on Income Level of Country","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Waiver; Scopus; Publishing; Sample (material); Economics; Business; Political science; Public economics; Advertising; Law; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.7512362361493289,"score_gpt":0.5689153115632962,"score_spread":0.18232092458603266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207822332","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9695775,0.0026217934,0.008289029,0.010283118,0.003665502,0.000072925686,0.00008366011,0.000004424612,0.0054020304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885689,0.00008253098,0.009349552,0.0004075302,0.00042804106,1.8322338e-7,0.000001403475,0.000014059303,0.0011477853],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9753995,0.0007632271,0.0023327423,0.0003080217,0.02074948,0.0004470077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92879826,0.008997973,0.003162659,0.00067456294,0.05760004,0.0007664786],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08100941,0.0001486305,0.0006584269,0.04606861,0.00023337857,0.04440401,0.0042016,0.00026866025,0.00072744995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.48447213,0.00010156652,0.00035044155,0.12010884,0.00011690918,0.036031693,0.0004951271,0.0028869738,0.0000110102055],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027523146,0.0007600409,0.82619774,0.0000440564,0.00012931449,0.00032241116,0.00019232079,0.0014207644,0.018504024,0.001735924,0.08284865,0.06756953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024016527,0.0011720578,0.8947114,0.00039159952,0.000039050447,0.00033764562,0.0011068064,0.0025630458,0.008289908,0.0076889563,0.081057765,0.00024011584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004372215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010003251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4034627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002449016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003073632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99941343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W333249797","doi":"","title":"Why We Write ed. by Meredith Maran (review)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.0734732040961127,"score_gpt":0.26164456622691584,"score_spread":0.18817136213080315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W333249797","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011593977,0.53056085,0.0003276359,0.2966711,0.0050301766,0.0002833102,0.00009455208,0.00016296828,0.15527543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57328755,0.18911807,0.009746853,0.1665995,0.027314719,0.000058532023,0.00055136933,0.0004735156,0.03284991],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959747,0.0005776845,0.0011233257,0.00021240927,0.0017294587,0.00038237328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925707,0.00021301827,0.0012104724,0.00060106564,0.004809514,0.00059522764],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010312098,0.00024258414,0.00049862865,0.00041062463,0.00045147754,0.070743985,0.0025164003,0.00016465993,0.000492067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007978666,0.00019510686,0.00024017958,0.00021404456,0.00012421478,0.19963966,0.0002594603,0.003358665,0.000044924174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024398101,0.00009961984,0.0003257485,0.00005686086,0.00007179577,0.000010285201,0.003213217,0.0000014064807,0.000059334034,0.0049545798,0.98226076,0.008922008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078562624,0.00016800174,0.000065007356,0.0010772891,0.00008369552,0.000075938435,0.0029476853,0.000013667053,0.000013993989,0.0021129374,0.99242395,0.00023218307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003506155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000081982245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56169355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022930918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033602637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99894065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W335010629","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44.3.008","title":"Something Wiki This Way Comes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Digital Games and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; World Wide Web; Data science; Business","score_opus":0.03431120210431861,"score_gpt":0.28576265788071775,"score_spread":0.25145145577639916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W335010629","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30874932,0.0012698643,0.00012460905,0.04441143,0.002135972,0.0001215154,0.0000015400522,0.000042496118,0.6431433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94236684,0.00032889706,0.0048730248,0.0034909341,0.0023431447,0.0000028253028,0.0000010603998,0.00002224021,0.046571027],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730176,0.0001830019,0.00050271914,0.00012017755,0.001482937,0.0004093828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966297,0.00039258887,0.00052574393,0.0001326708,0.0017845636,0.0005346971],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055300035,0.000102380334,0.00024757267,0.00032287178,0.00024462512,0.05657981,0.0010332451,0.0001951775,0.00084862945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014270544,0.00008176911,0.0001775692,0.00049163506,0.00013070664,0.17330542,0.0001088252,0.0014574539,0.00009200707],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006862635,0.00007814931,0.013648729,0.000012062915,0.0000707643,0.00002961104,0.026414357,0.0000033294223,0.0006163215,0.023341924,0.13926463,0.79651326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028907895,0.000051878073,0.0085172,0.000101836675,0.000014615833,0.0000131016905,0.011371726,0.0000037066932,0.000043446413,0.0063602584,0.97311336,0.00011978745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009870821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000099892604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8338487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017827451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044290224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9940327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W378148803","doi":"","title":"Writing Well in the 21st Century: The Five Essentials by Linda Spencer (review)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Media, Communication, and Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental ethics; Library science; Operations research; Computer science; Sociology; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06987709974138936,"score_gpt":0.35435701553518173,"score_spread":0.2844799157937924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W378148803","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12441642,0.21552241,0.00005044538,0.4651434,0.0032290476,0.0005338023,0.000004362441,0.000017099379,0.191083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8902918,0.099047996,0.00044782026,0.0073091714,0.0025092144,0.000008372978,0.000009107348,0.000010258095,0.00036625337],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99575716,0.001889723,0.0006165397,0.00009691876,0.0013836788,0.0002559574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964999,0.000855879,0.00076754176,0.00030770383,0.0013885561,0.0001804185],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.033490162,0.00007944221,0.00017079992,0.00009854628,0.0005608196,0.00939747,0.0022921588,0.00009909705,0.0001335855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01713025,0.000047280697,0.00007967501,0.0007124781,0.00011931407,0.024956435,0.00007681582,0.0014825237,0.000017623312],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011470804,0.00015702279,0.013831815,0.0000369918,0.000025904435,0.000003212197,0.18232308,0.000006630376,0.00003336702,0.006323807,0.76148045,0.035766236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019965663,0.000016642865,0.0023789483,0.00044569618,0.000027228574,0.000008895635,0.2747912,0.0000030332794,0.000008343121,0.0019725978,0.72007644,0.00007131281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017212983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00059574476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7658754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019654202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085613335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99522525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205215161","doi":"10.3138/jsp.42.4.442","title":"Manuscript Makeovers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Section (typography); Publishing; Sociology; Library science; Advice (programming); Genre analysis; Linguistics; Literature; Philosophy; Computer science; Art","score_opus":0.14505073447855882,"score_gpt":0.23118198587164873,"score_spread":0.08613125139308991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205215161","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17637582,0.0014658647,0.00020144183,0.006057593,0.0032313094,0.000074378535,0.000010222069,0.000080608064,0.81250274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881351,0.000052463056,0.0030178812,0.0015493305,0.0012509772,0.0000017107416,0.0000050027606,0.00002725829,0.00596026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977712,0.0002228405,0.0007492298,0.00013995945,0.00083119277,0.0002855984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959246,0.00009729243,0.00083541905,0.00043855526,0.0024701809,0.00023396668],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004527992,0.000151328,0.00025001974,0.0005862287,0.00047334097,0.06886777,0.0019618445,0.00013026012,0.002230973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032909946,0.00012570372,0.00020357012,0.00013395536,0.00012171347,0.23893948,0.00017739825,0.00242389,0.00005401053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011507043,0.0002768442,0.006549386,0.000021305865,0.00019674208,0.00006903855,0.09260357,0.0000013868041,0.00029788516,0.5342108,0.34561297,0.020045016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007520282,0.00021201126,0.007626879,0.000118550175,0.00006502531,0.00009654257,0.017599506,0.000009953775,0.00012527955,0.02284937,0.9503009,0.00024400573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038953128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011080455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8117593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009958052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015856713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205793674","doi":"10.3138/jsp.36.3.129","title":"Why Can't Young Scholars Write Their Second Books First?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Division of Graduate Education; Harvard University","keywords":"Publishing; Graduate education; Graduate students; Sociology; Job market; Management; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Political science; Economics; Psychology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.04092768690239166,"score_gpt":0.2257232187248888,"score_spread":0.18479553182249714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205793674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61876225,0.0096235955,0.00015166879,0.1458663,0.0031812417,0.00025110584,0.000121308876,0.00021078793,0.22183171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9723641,0.00017443216,0.0016390431,0.013652661,0.004436576,0.0000066160082,0.000026553944,0.0000703732,0.0076295943],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961906,0.00038605818,0.0013044019,0.00030147712,0.0012413372,0.0005761379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99358654,0.0003287672,0.0012530426,0.00078923214,0.0035887,0.00045373722],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006991329,0.00034227513,0.00049201655,0.0009584287,0.0015939577,0.17088874,0.0030042606,0.00027893178,0.0014823691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037285602,0.00028489775,0.00037307185,0.00021640316,0.00017298247,0.2551942,0.00035636633,0.005692241,0.000028764034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010363852,0.00037077453,0.008023169,0.00005583864,0.0004141881,0.000038433885,0.07262788,0.00006336665,0.0008910342,0.054533795,0.8357654,0.027112456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095005136,0.00013245142,0.0026593525,0.00022401552,0.00004785381,0.00016849139,0.0055872686,0.00006352319,0.00015230442,0.0025836658,0.9870909,0.0003401372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047811514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009155197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35360187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044710285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031835277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205877735","doi":"10.3138/jsp.37.2.131","title":"Where Manuscript Development Meets Faculty Development","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scholarship; Craft; Library science; Work (physics); Process (computing); Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Media studies; Computer science; Engineering; Visual arts; Art; Law","score_opus":0.06844926735587585,"score_gpt":0.24529889510244057,"score_spread":0.1768496277465647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205877735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77532357,0.007865992,0.0006222344,0.024918117,0.002860796,0.00022603513,0.00001647656,0.00019942046,0.18796739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9573071,0.000030531646,0.025003346,0.000640198,0.0017676117,0.000009069034,0.00009416449,0.000048166807,0.015099832],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960682,0.00020254182,0.0014829414,0.0002357017,0.0015603515,0.000450271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99495804,0.00010158441,0.0011578157,0.00036778083,0.003188854,0.00022592867],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00531851,0.00026729173,0.00036838613,0.000651352,0.001270318,0.10048077,0.0019557269,0.00018317952,0.00034714353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010504968,0.00022251037,0.00015146208,0.00017158168,0.000081321756,0.13017592,0.00029105914,0.0022137081,0.00005491255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009306759,0.00077485206,0.018296208,0.0001330088,0.00038844848,0.00009296193,0.06562593,0.00006785101,0.0010973407,0.13180383,0.6826895,0.09893703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067039195,0.000035619825,0.019639695,0.00025688283,0.000022617825,0.000042812924,0.0030358054,0.0000062629856,0.00037693666,0.0012489246,0.9743757,0.00028831782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028294732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014465661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29168624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005070986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007125342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9770388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206092611","doi":"10.1353/scp.2004.0022","title":"Index: Volume 35 (2003-4)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Volume (thermodynamics); Statistics; Mathematics; Computer science; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.04087324288531977,"score_gpt":0.20409361663483236,"score_spread":0.1632203737495126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206092611","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26149842,0.009883403,0.0075664516,0.012814316,0.01879443,0.0001777432,0.00017823339,0.0000531224,0.68903387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93615663,0.000294489,0.0037837273,0.0014026365,0.00090258784,0.000001920987,0.0000026104642,0.000026422156,0.057428952],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831915,0.000009827414,0.00097253657,0.0002510711,0.00012300524,0.0003244037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979452,0.000017251496,0.0010629834,0.0002210586,0.0005581211,0.00019538715],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033684273,0.00012460857,0.00041643696,0.0006118814,0.0002053991,0.013057446,0.0007579952,0.00013668678,0.0017334698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029948337,0.00013170627,0.00015492692,0.0006003034,0.00006985866,0.049132906,0.0001580012,0.00082010275,0.0021223282],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003624523,0.00017444305,0.19742045,0.000017678134,0.00029688666,0.000059160804,0.002042036,0.001016198,0.000020880707,0.23577991,0.5608742,0.0022619143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017212415,0.00007790682,0.040262718,0.000052105213,0.000010601336,0.000058377485,0.0013055833,0.000057547237,0.000016332851,0.040130507,0.91606224,0.00024482884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016553546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000061542037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67465824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003687956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012458586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99917907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206817137","doi":"10.3138/jsp.37.2.69","title":"Prestige and the University Press","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Higher Education Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fordham University","keywords":"Prestige; Rhetoric; Occupational prestige; Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Demography; Theology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.015487673370320353,"score_gpt":0.24465643869195622,"score_spread":0.22916876532163585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206817137","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6413627,0.0037623907,0.0006297412,0.1410314,0.0013168806,0.00016881569,0.00000459629,0.000023123317,0.21170035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98140305,0.00037669603,0.001732195,0.00041170232,0.0007925516,2.2323617e-7,2.5892732e-7,0.0000030906936,0.015280213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893636,0.00020209709,0.00015413044,0.000053398213,0.0005460306,0.00010801331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998878,0.0001863923,0.00026668631,0.000051796742,0.0005434568,0.00007363919],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030034753,0.000035110956,0.00007626437,0.00004647434,0.0004802729,0.0058038943,0.00036616885,0.000052022016,0.000023086457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010110927,0.00002450124,0.00003220399,0.0001421868,0.00014895025,0.027817061,0.000038508253,0.00037240723,0.0000011787383],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072155235,0.000048249593,0.07283934,0.0000048247866,0.000028816527,0.000015535452,0.017242935,0.000020224843,0.000020997453,0.5524063,0.3528117,0.0044889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004976971,0.0000038371077,0.14142407,0.000014438627,0.000008787208,0.0000036100155,0.0022663346,9.0435185e-7,0.000006023248,0.0026201252,0.8531225,0.000031710213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034671873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015838197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5497862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012048167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040682938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210255074","doi":"10.3138/jsp.53.2.02","title":"Strategies to Increase the Number of Open Access Journals: The Cases of Elsevier and Springer Nature","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Open access journal; Library science; Political science; Business; Computer science; Scopus; Law","score_opus":0.5532761290723078,"score_gpt":0.6122283546242888,"score_spread":0.058952225551980986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210255074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9580271,0.0068989126,0.000097163924,0.024147283,0.00054346386,0.0002205699,0.00004140537,0.0000014970931,0.010022581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973512,0.00037073778,0.0005824177,0.0009847975,0.00014937764,0.0000045087886,2.4642253e-7,0.000009028008,0.00054764416],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9829064,0.0013924032,0.0015311828,0.0003054855,0.013502398,0.00036214865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97244596,0.010717818,0.0024198296,0.00080149865,0.01314928,0.00046559505],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12039622,0.00012000133,0.0004404977,0.015015588,0.0008079619,0.216302,0.019032039,0.000094338255,0.0011703243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1552121,0.000055208664,0.00018268565,0.08051053,0.0001526422,0.09362901,0.011727584,0.0033890556,0.0000018261685],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027710426,0.00022826422,0.6778256,0.000013697048,0.00014606547,0.00012481232,0.0012676545,0.00050249166,0.0014064991,0.0046660216,0.10257793,0.21096386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068310683,0.00023768206,0.6800468,0.000072653,0.000039302344,0.0011920548,0.024517559,0.000095315176,0.00027923242,0.02583803,0.26684028,0.00015795062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046985756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030283374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21080591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009742372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097531226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974275},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4210273005","doi":"10.3138/jsp.35.4.200","title":"Beacon's Modern Era: 1945-2003","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Freedom and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Section (typography); History; Library science; Publishing; Art history; Art; Literature; Computer science","score_opus":0.03142404850984021,"score_gpt":0.29192895476616265,"score_spread":0.26050490625632244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210273005","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4939346,0.0064602974,0.012433517,0.1452111,0.008495116,0.00026169777,0.000019837375,0.00011950351,0.33306432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98214066,0.0003215448,0.0070271716,0.0035111809,0.0051925713,8.182947e-7,0.0000012533676,0.000018777026,0.0017860413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727887,0.00018126833,0.00054296455,0.00012811933,0.0013732288,0.0004955496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965641,0.0001191701,0.0005105128,0.00013334981,0.0021621934,0.0005106698],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005240452,0.00011386696,0.00023379562,0.00026950278,0.00056647614,0.012081818,0.0011165704,0.00040747647,0.00006645287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012093763,0.000103079416,0.00012259404,0.0006461706,0.00019358755,0.06803535,0.0000705905,0.0028527088,0.000016596774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003643038,0.00015210589,0.013984006,0.00001940504,0.00013465351,0.00015496153,0.053024232,0.00052900147,0.00073461316,0.78731346,0.10919139,0.03472576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014705113,0.000095962794,0.0031040977,0.00017255472,0.000060135237,0.00008885104,0.006700589,0.000012620143,0.00013946573,0.25049883,0.737385,0.0002714102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012458295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015322305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6281936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005106996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019764581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210274097","doi":"10.3138/jsp.53.2.00","title":"Editorial of the <i>Journal of Scholarly Publishing</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scholarly communication; Library science; History; Political science; Regional science; Sociology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.01466290692520687,"score_gpt":0.2072891458656885,"score_spread":0.19262623894048164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210274097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5336071,0.00602816,0.006344567,0.10089023,0.34469464,0.00029302237,0.000046507586,0.00006628281,0.008029476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9204252,0.00007200212,0.011654239,0.004472845,0.063050434,0.0000014320435,0.0000018943541,0.000040685474,0.0002813085],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99042803,0.0013079895,0.0018558077,0.00023807657,0.005727743,0.00044237127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987944,0.0005770062,0.0047558434,0.0008146963,0.0055263164,0.00038215448],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01824903,0.00022663976,0.00054188044,0.0009084094,0.00066310645,0.09665202,0.014959657,0.00023697528,0.00007931704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068128076,0.00016211304,0.000499354,0.002605884,0.00006770475,0.54475784,0.0030412874,0.00792964,0.0000010940463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021285393,0.00034470687,0.020557858,0.000048665355,0.00021943216,0.00005103454,0.005472461,0.00085720525,0.007525514,0.012359864,0.9463959,0.0059545576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030232938,0.0010535002,0.014805209,0.00023741524,0.00009836053,0.0011648734,0.0032281633,0.0002198371,0.0016930554,0.015140485,0.95899355,0.00034222676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011462084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000057466987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4481058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021083128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002057486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99435914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210428672","doi":"10.3138/jsp.53.2.01","title":"A ‘Thankless Task’? My Work as a Book Review Editor","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Japanese History and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nuts and bolts; Task (project management); Work (physics); Computer science; Management; Engineering; Economics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.06152765123331959,"score_gpt":0.341782523788624,"score_spread":0.2802548725553044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210428672","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[2.3201162e-7,0.9432483,0.0000014193378,0.005020297,0.015274514,0.0005583276,0.000017021675,0.0000436636,0.035836257],"genre_scores_gemma":[9.985971e-8,0.94488645,0.00006707508,0.0065001245,0.026250442,0.000050818573,0.00002446148,0.00005891627,0.022161601],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990623,0.002893255,0.0017305058,0.00043143722,0.0037235464,0.0005982847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99336946,0.00058207056,0.0036948512,0.00045698907,0.001201465,0.00069518434],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015469558,0.00046164033,0.0023623956,0.00048405532,0.0016602073,0.017466413,0.003916108,0.00086135446,0.0077166813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017498862,0.00036449535,0.0016958353,0.0023389973,0.00016802081,0.05690344,0.00033713997,0.009270748,0.00012511865],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041368266,0.000043049324,7.887753e-7,0.004582734,0.00012259443,0.00013700732,0.0022595213,4.4719282e-8,2.534427e-8,0.0003909272,0.72677326,0.26568595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011178448,0.000051091753,3.0647857e-7,0.056398224,0.0010030491,0.00017103784,0.0012008293,2.4726377e-9,3.5520342e-9,0.000090862064,0.9406089,0.00036390912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000077172066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001627889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26532203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017651739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005149977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210745799","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2017-0017","title":"Publication History: A Double-DOI-Based Method for Storing and/or Monitoring Information about Published and Corrected Academic Literature","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Scientific Computing and Data Management","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Identifier; Publishing; Information retrieval; Digital library; World Wide Web; Data science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.14477699893494345,"score_gpt":0.38299061066604045,"score_spread":0.238213611731097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210745799","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30753052,0.011169332,0.56661713,0.0770409,0.032927405,0.001798757,0.00018289147,0.000299275,0.0024337722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7340438,0.000092093294,0.25284076,0.0047481987,0.0022132401,0.00016462833,0.00022972793,0.00006253238,0.00560505],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99427223,0.00045765284,0.0015343067,0.00047348574,0.0029345728,0.0003277255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905296,0.0018712783,0.00230346,0.00054610765,0.004436581,0.00031299205],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.049889635,0.00017074101,0.00035462162,0.002626122,0.00079344976,0.06288739,0.0018049593,0.000136284,0.000079989004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04862497,0.00013275213,0.00010615516,0.0021714352,0.000034377572,0.12647289,0.0008097276,0.0021320323,0.0000010562742],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010166387,0.000061247025,0.018206757,0.00006401259,0.00005958124,0.0000075616254,0.00867665,0.0015403854,0.00047215115,0.002221327,0.4784971,0.4891766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025413167,0.00017598615,0.011127301,0.00012525119,0.000038384434,0.000091879025,0.0031928108,0.02712681,0.00004565898,0.0012010704,0.9541314,0.00020212434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000034748013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016735381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48897448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070049387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047413932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97833854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212770965","doi":"10.3138/jsp.36.1.6","title":"Why Copy Editors Matter","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Quality (philosophy); Process (computing); Computer science; Work (physics); Library science; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Programming language; Engineering","score_opus":0.3940466698594513,"score_gpt":0.506418899806929,"score_spread":0.1123722299474777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212770965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7399759,0.0018673557,0.027447408,0.18768564,0.017886538,0.00015140594,0.0000166052,0.00002106909,0.024948038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9728379,0.00007627319,0.010628991,0.008525103,0.0068572685,0.0000011294982,9.2183836e-7,0.00002264645,0.0010497492],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9772671,0.00023577722,0.0014351124,0.0003737762,0.020107837,0.00058040174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97560656,0.0021563761,0.0011511658,0.0005655471,0.019593665,0.00092668046],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06278511,0.00014264676,0.00037692513,0.06294875,0.00031232226,0.22701459,0.0059720613,0.00024287544,0.0012071467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16287848,0.00009163632,0.00030958926,0.10457364,0.00009981791,0.1487791,0.0007029858,0.0023027037,0.00043617416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001872205,0.00008861729,0.16330764,0.0000018309736,0.000018459175,0.00006997185,0.00013223875,0.00012049767,0.0008719123,0.0003853515,0.8261366,0.008848165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013742992,0.00025991496,0.11503638,0.00004693572,0.000009755914,0.00025290347,0.00078026886,0.000019754501,0.0012546807,0.050061323,0.83071107,0.00019273725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000117085925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000048647817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23286197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037604923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060946064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212791549","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.2.093","title":"A Different Kind of Profession","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Earthquake and Disaster Impact Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medical profession; Medicine; Medical education","score_opus":0.07779843902014343,"score_gpt":0.3270049933289749,"score_spread":0.24920655430883148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212791549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9706829,0.00095328834,0.00007020436,0.0080519095,0.0005305025,0.00005658287,0.000001405597,0.000008056818,0.019645158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99791855,0.00032093603,0.0003208085,0.00023335103,0.0005143736,4.6836456e-7,2.554533e-7,0.000005371269,0.0006858946],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787045,0.00024615444,0.00045497195,0.00007018526,0.0011375169,0.00022070121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786824,0.00018430015,0.0006033994,0.00008987078,0.0010605782,0.00019362135],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020373503,0.00007457627,0.00024710686,0.00021256642,0.0005393332,0.0019118761,0.0004270589,0.00010930558,0.00006119033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005101244,0.000052524956,0.00012988273,0.00028452236,0.00014598899,0.032450106,0.00008300562,0.0006792364,0.0000021540557],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008787547,0.0002623648,0.8089435,0.000024218374,0.00009067422,0.000050742055,0.15076493,0.0000023079515,0.0019099575,0.003112638,0.021633485,0.013117321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011640509,0.00028096553,0.9066388,0.00038098652,0.00004016223,0.00004289062,0.057079237,0.0000010604173,0.00068094,0.00293605,0.030591581,0.00016329865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021180243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011335942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0976953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006334088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030599488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214836454","doi":"10.3138/jsp.37.1.55","title":"Reviews","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.25417435761775975,"score_gpt":0.31714232360541694,"score_spread":0.06296796598765719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214836454","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078952216,0.0531078,0.15610592,0.20557235,0.0033342189,0.00031023443,0.0000022143886,0.0001764374,0.5024386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7925694,0.0008346403,0.18019564,0.018159222,0.0030445019,0.0000010645891,8.347269e-7,0.000014560263,0.005180164],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985218,0.00005865538,0.0005634845,0.00011267215,0.0005453321,0.0001980651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980688,0.000050200575,0.0005180032,0.00024090901,0.00082482916,0.00029726498],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019188346,0.00009467975,0.00021085172,0.00018370891,0.00009173584,0.09309196,0.0014490511,0.000068283436,0.000019899755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002745585,0.000056788092,0.00015416514,0.0004293185,0.000012594579,0.41695908,0.00020155094,0.00075030094,0.000048618673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055754062,0.0000933839,0.0003421195,0.000009495525,0.000023113875,0.0000738599,0.001498433,0.00004202494,0.0033296256,0.08562173,0.36864805,0.5403126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024413646,0.00007130419,0.0017606051,0.000085787884,0.0000044200233,0.0005675108,0.000021198073,0.00013390684,0.0005038519,0.004605382,0.991904,0.0000978884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008718487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000047356057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71361715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008485144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008440931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9078495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229495204","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44.2.008","title":"The Consequences of a Life in Scholarly Publishing","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Nature versus nurture; Sociology; Power (physics); Set (abstract data type); Epistemology; Media studies; Social science; Political science; Law; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08451408128014952,"score_gpt":0.26408601040228985,"score_spread":0.17957192912214032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229495204","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8261707,0.028864723,0.00005181831,0.061415654,0.0033044498,0.00019689089,0.000021980879,0.000048998656,0.07992483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951143,0.0003937807,0.00073475257,0.0012404865,0.001862514,0.000007101875,0.000007131761,0.00003181669,0.00060809316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939441,0.0011633327,0.0020419434,0.00018667997,0.001944303,0.000719648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888664,0.0017970451,0.0024585442,0.00072709116,0.005643509,0.00050743076],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03149095,0.00024575257,0.0005338279,0.0010183973,0.00104329,0.29561597,0.0041105305,0.0002886972,0.00012604134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0745714,0.00017035249,0.00026559966,0.0005592139,0.00053329655,0.6131179,0.00043301194,0.0061473073,0.00000847546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018521247,0.00038280003,0.25489876,0.000053698885,0.00022825091,0.000008562821,0.052105527,0.00001829491,0.0013578212,0.6250678,0.047736168,0.017957147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022881858,0.0002395427,0.07399227,0.00072357355,0.00009027814,0.000101313395,0.0630947,0.00003268748,0.00021415672,0.02625658,0.83242404,0.00054266694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015783475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007471798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7846879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026511625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083264813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229674669","doi":"10.3138/jsp.42.2.268","title":"Review","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.033038907316947426,"score_gpt":0.2952178851311025,"score_spread":0.26217897781415506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229674669","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6446762,0.15847579,0.00027468908,0.091831475,0.0090335235,0.0004774718,0.000034956396,0.00023469707,0.09496118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90026695,0.0073437393,0.0494012,0.03361127,0.008021794,0.0000060672014,0.000010730221,0.00032272362,0.0010155397],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968227,0.0001840057,0.0010340767,0.00015809895,0.0014573954,0.00034369883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928566,0.00016550062,0.0015076476,0.00044209935,0.0045315665,0.0004965536],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.016416928,0.00015945529,0.0004171288,0.00052428775,0.00014433486,0.033633232,0.0017581556,0.00019665377,0.00073408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04571828,0.00012607996,0.0002791667,0.00096337555,0.000050878112,0.23023973,0.00015724161,0.0075278617,0.000521481],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020678046,0.00008994338,0.011043835,0.00019236535,0.000071059454,0.0000915369,0.00009475778,9.340541e-7,0.10050008,0.0025031997,0.8645413,0.020850308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006105265,0.000060182207,0.011749,0.0021559936,0.0001011596,0.0017167031,0.00004761572,0.0000035608732,0.00048635088,0.0017440909,0.9811476,0.0001772102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015247129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001634545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2555907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096303374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038681398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229782676","doi":"10.3138/jsp.45.4.409","title":"Book Reviews","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Guardian; Promotion (chess); Midge; Sociology; Management; Political science; Economics; Law; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.05665069579184208,"score_gpt":0.2504650920330488,"score_spread":0.19381439624120672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229782676","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01980621,0.12341041,0.0019539157,0.09316386,0.0055509275,0.00027772482,0.000008491324,0.00015570698,0.75567275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8359277,0.0053804927,0.0076095895,0.071256496,0.01787126,0.000015828993,0.000035386623,0.00012769674,0.061775528],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972562,0.0006288451,0.0009927726,0.00013699815,0.00073525286,0.00024992597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957729,0.0002769002,0.0011779662,0.00051791314,0.002029184,0.00022515496],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012181949,0.00015008998,0.00037741772,0.00045018713,0.00053063536,0.108114,0.0018556337,0.00011369266,0.0009818892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0142527735,0.00011487021,0.00023822268,0.00011587864,0.000087344495,0.2387898,0.00015358492,0.0024890017,0.00007638929],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012018005,0.000052833235,0.00040479188,0.00001748154,0.000026967567,0.0000019042795,0.0059311036,0.0000022095462,0.0001230557,0.10477098,0.85403407,0.034622587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037248433,0.00010684926,0.00044665107,0.00017632628,0.000030433584,0.000027779772,0.000503962,0.000028689597,0.000015678008,0.004520344,0.993635,0.00013577736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005390288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032870856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8161215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096283744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000093070776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230188763","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.2.144","title":"Historical Scholarship, Periodization, Themes, and Specialization: Implications for Research and Publication","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Discipline; Periodization; Scholarly communication; Sociology; Normative; Comparative historical research; Social science; Media studies; History; Political science; Law; Archaeology; Publishing","score_opus":0.5109947675991872,"score_gpt":0.48293938114818175,"score_spread":0.028055386451005415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230188763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5721535,0.009075723,0.036075693,0.37375194,0.00077099825,0.00074021384,0.000022398308,0.000037878726,0.00737163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98137265,0.0012341527,0.010378828,0.00055670185,0.0014919105,0.000019539015,0.0000050857884,0.000019701889,0.0049214233],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99414647,0.00044776875,0.0012067513,0.00047786307,0.0033067001,0.0004144549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976924,0.0023991065,0.00071538193,0.00040857206,0.018949203,0.0006037336],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.032356698,0.00011269486,0.00029108857,0.0018661754,0.0021411516,0.03536336,0.0018000624,0.00020387044,0.000044535405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1517493,0.00008387571,0.00007601633,0.0032805642,0.0003983567,0.08272551,0.0002978182,0.0015617125,0.0000045296797],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050459454,0.00008563443,0.57830775,0.000008518597,0.000013389809,0.0000029859918,0.002011527,0.0000055277123,0.002209882,0.075047135,0.3067017,0.03555548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043323345,0.0001254277,0.4135907,0.000017810518,0.000003973682,0.00022676571,0.00051661703,0.000060737504,0.00006000983,0.12585276,0.45902064,0.00009131873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017398994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000689106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40921912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040282108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007967811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230208772","doi":"10.3138/jsp.42.4.539","title":"Reviews","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.1765891498094343,"score_gpt":0.28876705468551417,"score_spread":0.11217790487607987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230208772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5458012,0.039826475,0.0020396716,0.0038315274,0.0041782754,0.00048439825,0.000017388864,0.00018140776,0.40363964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9064837,0.0007107035,0.08660231,0.0024706193,0.002359046,0.000004392413,0.0000025112417,0.00017014351,0.001196593],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965853,0.0004252545,0.0013274972,0.00016459667,0.0011266908,0.00037063542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99471974,0.00006851425,0.002012369,0.00038537625,0.0023613286,0.0004526505],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.016624482,0.0001760195,0.00047583316,0.00076916453,0.00013355572,0.020959504,0.0016784776,0.00017566995,0.00086243724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020317584,0.00013451502,0.00032525256,0.00088484975,0.000045197325,0.26397175,0.00015876655,0.0029359814,0.001110861],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023180411,0.00040095608,0.09633122,0.000056549674,0.00019939752,0.00038647786,0.0060984707,0.0000016074082,0.025956724,0.00782965,0.8028945,0.059612677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011169377,0.00023113695,0.06977888,0.0004859199,0.000116195806,0.0009926985,0.00052920857,0.0000042442216,0.0014021622,0.006559111,0.9184975,0.00028598824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004161193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007201776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40244305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021957274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019372531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230271260","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.3.197","title":"The Publishing Experiences of Historians","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Process (computing); Public relations; Library science; History; Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.07362299713987175,"score_gpt":0.2362609948590433,"score_spread":0.16263799771917156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230271260","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83129305,0.010113547,0.00017374792,0.023847977,0.0069859223,0.000116271825,0.000007800435,0.00006239735,0.1273993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993645,0.00036133282,0.0005813274,0.00038650705,0.0020837584,0.000006209445,0.0000039867286,0.000021934187,0.002909927],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961582,0.0004220669,0.0012572424,0.00015774502,0.0016635198,0.00034122082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99160993,0.0008700174,0.0018113832,0.00060110074,0.0049055554,0.00020199912],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00833861,0.00016603491,0.00033582843,0.00044976937,0.0022185245,0.094538674,0.0036992864,0.00015408709,0.00012808217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019098045,0.00011009205,0.00025801017,0.0002717047,0.00055152935,0.27979946,0.00025119874,0.002769055,0.00000338285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007816042,0.0001382517,0.0021198797,0.000014267232,0.00012223113,0.000023506322,0.59932923,0.000008125757,0.00036417317,0.109973155,0.27893177,0.008897254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048307964,0.00014453994,0.001056963,0.0000941168,0.000023906241,0.00012992429,0.14482822,0.000018072935,0.00010978072,0.0029347201,0.8500184,0.00015829138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040130725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015259658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57108665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020178793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051965367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230492936","doi":"10.3138/jsp.36.3.133","title":"The Marketing That Authors Really Want","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restructuring; Point (geometry); Marketing; Process (computing); Business; Public relations; Advertising; Sociology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05619576802137495,"score_gpt":0.2497442901438618,"score_spread":0.19354852212248685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230492936","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38472283,0.008945765,0.00013628721,0.30550605,0.004050947,0.00018363897,0.000012676708,0.00014833704,0.29629347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841057,0.00042201992,0.0017777337,0.0012023626,0.003573911,0.000003062249,0.000004836803,0.00003261409,0.008877776],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99623203,0.0008686443,0.0009349845,0.00016477541,0.0013708251,0.00042875667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941808,0.0012800773,0.001264626,0.00057481515,0.0024504028,0.00024926092],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026477821,0.00017848461,0.00024381225,0.00034744444,0.0022930468,0.20291817,0.0027695207,0.00014494406,0.00018283518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014698814,0.00011424221,0.0002315369,0.0001402804,0.00016152847,0.17168325,0.00028925427,0.0038440563,0.000020158772],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021588527,0.0001360325,0.00429711,0.000018327271,0.00021877751,0.000018363236,0.033497956,0.000041352912,0.0002933863,0.15072905,0.38933405,0.4211997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038346378,0.000041451873,0.007721918,0.00014588393,0.00003382366,0.000064184416,0.008959605,0.0000981786,0.000020707339,0.0034383025,0.9789354,0.00015703026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010361821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048323753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5993829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024118167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025765089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99900585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230545602","doi":"10.3138/jsp.40.2.184","title":"Reflections on Ten Years of Teaching Writing for Publication to Graduate Students and Junior Faculty","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Style (visual arts); Graduate students; Mathematics education; Course (navigation); Medical education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Political science; Medicine; Engineering; Visual arts; Art","score_opus":0.2143210131868709,"score_gpt":0.40399792637140514,"score_spread":0.18967691318453422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230545602","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9458526,0.00012143548,0.00043550946,0.035018824,0.00039075754,0.00026273422,0.00004545186,0.0000474967,0.017825242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907706,0.000015201243,0.0063148057,0.001603944,0.0006377666,0.000006278097,0.000029719216,0.000016746439,0.00060497597],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977199,0.00019921911,0.000786783,0.00018055072,0.000887776,0.00022578923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958134,0.00029233034,0.00078643556,0.00029004886,0.0026191666,0.00019858386],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006211734,0.00012613805,0.00026388865,0.00086005824,0.00066959637,0.04484392,0.0010776914,0.00009225664,0.000007598382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011255802,0.0001179559,0.000118266165,0.00016655817,0.000035679997,0.05640519,0.000103331615,0.0016063584,0.0000016324467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037273872,0.0011060663,0.0085953325,0.000057291094,0.00028375525,0.0000057550283,0.10378125,0.00006117922,0.0054931315,0.3895032,0.0997473,0.39099297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004285493,0.0036675504,0.44219655,0.0016257064,0.00025722044,0.00009355601,0.03754912,0.00009366851,0.00029003771,0.028643817,0.4804502,0.00084707583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000095591095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037861217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43360123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012642013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007529018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230649703","doi":"10.3138/jsp.35.4.210","title":"A Tale of Two Journals","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Operations research; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.031175285504923822,"score_gpt":0.2565850488407769,"score_spread":0.22540976333585305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230649703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76226133,0.00259364,0.1588662,0.020023985,0.001282581,0.000089974805,0.0000015246269,0.000059582384,0.054821156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93560463,0.00003971709,0.06286945,0.0006959935,0.00024926566,4.3801577e-7,1.9408212e-7,0.0000072608364,0.0005330299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977546,0.00005051959,0.0007391782,0.00012294558,0.0011325536,0.00020024649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975434,0.000098725686,0.0008707467,0.0001831505,0.0010716869,0.00023229195],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018183057,0.000098219345,0.00023023355,0.0008217441,0.00012497706,0.033888083,0.0017920496,0.0000670464,0.00002759771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017168215,0.0000781847,0.00015867694,0.0013678463,0.000027621998,0.21976514,0.0002879599,0.0007148223,0.0000046527402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025224072,0.0015425053,0.18637851,0.00013537575,0.0009070193,0.0011370184,0.020317461,0.008471339,0.03657677,0.3833133,0.07585566,0.2851128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013687443,0.0013585587,0.100853495,0.0016672773,0.000050813716,0.004095605,0.0011362756,0.0003352784,0.067699194,0.64452034,0.16353038,0.0010653532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009671506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000013235203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28404745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008722893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066577626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9671148},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4230679116","doi":"10.3138/jsp.43.1.133","title":"Letter to the Editor","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Veterinary Practice and Education Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.2867778310496117,"score_gpt":0.4384778351042073,"score_spread":0.1517000040545956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230679116","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004116179,0.000498326,0.00014689827,0.90154517,0.07459701,0.00029543927,0.000016448894,0.000020905307,0.022468206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00013114337,0.00006599923,0.0011826017,0.64510626,0.3404548,0.000029932035,0.0000069012412,0.000041640855,0.012980732],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947371,0.0016353056,0.0013327032,0.00024604358,0.0013853863,0.00066346116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908238,0.0019986748,0.0023676625,0.00059943163,0.0040233163,0.00018708342],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008873797,0.00027055808,0.00053093105,0.00057725515,0.0015278005,0.0060382714,0.0019255457,0.0012455152,0.00093334704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011208597,0.00016223158,0.00023918891,0.00039430498,0.00003921568,0.044573326,0.00054484955,0.033642832,0.0008422457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028194683,0.000016206423,0.0011528964,0.00008637139,0.0001598563,0.000114918825,0.0070299585,1.8152862e-7,0.000008532531,0.0000142916815,0.99083424,0.00055437937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022955408,0.00013496986,0.002818122,0.00047809543,0.000121169775,0.00006758029,0.0026778197,8.39039e-8,2.836148e-7,0.00016788572,0.99312997,0.00017446605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013833932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009875479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2658578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036035475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011096762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231104245","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.2.174","title":"Accuracy of References in Journals of Hand Surgery","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Medical and Biological Sciences","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Volume (thermodynamics); Hand surgery; Medicine; Surgery; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.18977381341788893,"score_gpt":0.33604182275057976,"score_spread":0.14626800933269082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231104245","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98523754,0.004243364,0.00003767051,0.008908186,0.00022778417,0.000041814314,0.0000017332244,0.0000020968914,0.0012998092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963724,0.0020475236,0.00090057275,0.0003576391,0.0002577491,2.709523e-7,6.732408e-7,0.0000022753557,0.000060910243],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969587,0.00015900114,0.0012775523,0.00010217504,0.0013021388,0.00020044214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958174,0.0012176428,0.0013593427,0.00009465019,0.0012130277,0.0002979432],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007154718,0.00007960738,0.00063021993,0.00048508283,0.000060992767,0.000577395,0.00038924158,0.00016817277,0.00032155198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04327079,0.000041691383,0.00018703469,0.00082493265,0.00028347282,0.012592914,0.000058719674,0.0011548002,7.036263e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001543093,0.00021005038,0.9358418,0.00004437728,0.000026338937,0.00014695908,0.00025867915,0.0000013327362,0.03238483,0.000049035072,0.0031464628,0.027735831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006756126,0.00040048655,0.9874228,0.0011601596,0.000018012612,0.0006026149,0.0004408028,0.0000053083077,0.005416389,0.0014514097,0.002347895,0.000058493755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001083108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008755106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05158102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028894352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057233416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96478814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231113198","doi":"10.3138/jsp.38.1.31","title":"Beyond Google: What Next for Publishing?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Business; World Wide Web; Computer science; Data science; Political science","score_opus":0.024873684332515574,"score_gpt":0.22089433645130915,"score_spread":0.19602065211879358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231113198","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18345584,0.01789275,0.3842258,0.20750633,0.013349991,0.000773422,0.0000102259155,0.0005317911,0.19225386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69785255,0.0002635025,0.25797567,0.013186959,0.0058493726,0.000023794351,0.000029377416,0.00008030983,0.024738472],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971155,0.00006937208,0.00085135066,0.00029219186,0.0012437408,0.00042782584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964848,0.00045972556,0.0008096179,0.00028820452,0.0016879609,0.00026968546],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002607734,0.00018481043,0.00027956924,0.0009110247,0.00036957525,0.55696255,0.0029156148,0.00020148398,0.000023069024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030483173,0.00015622721,0.0002337777,0.001506797,0.000030153476,0.7932631,0.00041362573,0.00090309855,0.0000054095635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005094934,0.00014195402,0.005080486,0.000024689345,0.00006447247,0.000041214033,0.0005785156,0.00008865117,0.0004278314,0.14562154,0.6356988,0.21218091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015975808,0.00020368597,0.0073495074,0.00013576042,0.000012369897,0.00020309728,0.000601535,0.0009874986,0.0010791927,0.13303901,0.8544428,0.00034799392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015744004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000051731117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51439667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014519338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005603991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6370761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231229476","doi":"10.3138/jsp.37.1.48","title":"A Bibliography of Books and Journal Articles on Scholarly Publishing","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliography; Publishing; Library science; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06095155669188632,"score_gpt":0.25005199890531615,"score_spread":0.18910044221342984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231229476","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85686755,0.010882646,0.000163423,0.0527914,0.0012530799,0.0001524927,0.00003046142,0.000073237585,0.07778571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862339,0.0036548637,0.0039614555,0.0026236032,0.0030828337,0.000002653403,0.0000055145238,0.000052573727,0.0003826415],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942441,0.0006744122,0.0018897323,0.0002902803,0.0023433242,0.0005581265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98800224,0.00068663195,0.0024525884,0.0006072957,0.007622625,0.0006286381],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015573278,0.00032977364,0.00060788373,0.024326118,0.0012205184,0.4010078,0.002641491,0.00031563087,0.00022444289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012435145,0.0002704472,0.0004181959,0.0032810257,0.0003173383,0.5351607,0.00035468792,0.007496388,0.000006881755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044010198,0.00081125385,0.034537427,0.000077576595,0.00065897394,0.00005116422,0.027365725,0.000078381105,0.0035195446,0.12836432,0.6811563,0.12293927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035352567,0.0010892842,0.024695203,0.0011401764,0.00021063868,0.0006062027,0.013596318,0.00012581609,0.00066869205,0.027642924,0.9260761,0.000613398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022838937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014323933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24491984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000083171806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022284566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231832533","doi":"10.3138/jsp.36.3.139","title":"Adventures in Trade Publishing","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Memoir; Promotion (chess); Adventure; Order (exchange); Dream; Media studies; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Law; History; Business; Art history; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.0495910561293315,"score_gpt":0.25000940022190504,"score_spread":0.20041834409257353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231832533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51435775,0.00958063,0.00009827503,0.25059113,0.0024061725,0.00018961694,0.000022237477,0.00012785976,0.22262636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98970836,0.00012739394,0.0019686907,0.0034175236,0.0038177017,0.0000037332068,0.000015668596,0.000035433506,0.0009054904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961702,0.00044232543,0.0013540133,0.00022642835,0.0013349043,0.00047211396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996738,0.00037409787,0.0010342273,0.00047389773,0.0010971184,0.00028264977],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0096987225,0.00022052067,0.00040010287,0.0014014998,0.00043571286,0.21768467,0.0027614923,0.0002570845,0.00038029125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010592414,0.00019139436,0.0002364024,0.00034326882,0.00010265713,0.47601473,0.00022230363,0.0055332785,0.000012175774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014583445,0.0007346631,0.017615296,0.000045715304,0.00015549269,0.000070217815,0.0924613,0.00041984575,0.0006420743,0.3379103,0.33016622,0.21963304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013412577,0.0000878748,0.014514264,0.00025983597,0.000025938643,0.00007390629,0.007655681,0.00013522792,0.00005182641,0.0062382887,0.9693535,0.00026242557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032015878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014607697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6391873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041110854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002873981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99774176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231943027","doi":"10.3138/jsp.34.3.158","title":"Reviews","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.07106144134876644,"score_gpt":0.29417734481434643,"score_spread":0.22311590346558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231943027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48003954,0.09989253,0.0034521236,0.010156384,0.0056791557,0.00061954284,0.000016546317,0.00016233939,0.39998183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91403973,0.0011404586,0.07601494,0.0040246053,0.0019370132,0.000005224221,0.0000029616203,0.00021439506,0.0026206875],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958074,0.0008978383,0.0013485188,0.00017412189,0.0013658204,0.00040628455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948556,0.00014844589,0.0018165429,0.00037158784,0.0023472724,0.00046056655],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02487161,0.00018281625,0.00049970316,0.0007157823,0.00017124749,0.04243817,0.0010656521,0.0001759551,0.0004916246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068159685,0.00014320549,0.00032820078,0.0011712858,0.00003536359,0.2243795,0.00005771888,0.0031409964,0.0007965638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048409405,0.00021392973,0.04254595,0.000042542102,0.00012039938,0.00018678878,0.0007412788,0.000024783025,0.03472913,0.023884194,0.8804053,0.017057288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008311688,0.00007690203,0.0042874636,0.00023492506,0.00005125751,0.0009118411,0.00022971905,0.0000019142853,0.000812013,0.0038038357,0.9885938,0.00016511482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000064536866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000034276761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43400016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032849386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003244243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231944726","doi":"10.3138/jsp.43.2.148","title":"An Experiment in Open-Access Textbook Publishing: Changing the World One Textbook at a Time","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Open Education and E-Learning","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Upload; Phenomenon; Computer science; Action (physics); World Wide Web; Public relations; Business; Political science; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10790292068468377,"score_gpt":0.33840973530968194,"score_spread":0.23050681462499817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231944726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30625865,0.0011945383,0.0053925347,0.04665723,0.0024490755,0.00075618504,0.0000018921979,0.0001702534,0.63711965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9551425,0.000019630368,0.027019756,0.0045894724,0.00055538793,0.000028400653,0.0000036307126,0.00004275561,0.01259848],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99626666,0.0005013102,0.0009283222,0.00046239127,0.001186196,0.0006551353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99651575,0.00019890285,0.0011091114,0.00078611745,0.0009124809,0.00047763775],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01045851,0.00023177336,0.00037936796,0.0015621732,0.00070077326,0.23108527,0.014487894,0.0001287987,0.0015085554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014685524,0.00018007623,0.00010982742,0.0019277142,0.00005497918,0.41941005,0.0042461525,0.002509702,0.000064012886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005409478,0.0045880643,0.12094376,0.00008666498,0.0004744863,0.00047151052,0.30198404,0.00073392,0.026859181,0.27961123,0.11783399,0.14587219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010941187,0.0016733267,0.22316171,0.0034199043,0.0001397307,0.001282999,0.07596902,0.02115868,0.022247044,0.019449,0.61678135,0.003776064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025426783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012008472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6488838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005847583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000577225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232370666","doi":"10.3138/jsp.38.4.229","title":"Significant University Press Titles for Undergraduates, 2006–2007","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Mathematics education; Media studies; Psychology","score_opus":0.06670111206130658,"score_gpt":0.24731486253483173,"score_spread":0.18061375047352515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232370666","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.129186,0.005758118,0.029564688,0.03809539,0.0074678073,0.0007166901,0.00027989902,0.00027681695,0.78865457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660374,0.00014737216,0.00562091,0.00056725263,0.002546957,6.5674504e-7,0.000031749943,0.000035733734,0.02501197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824923,0.00012944815,0.00054089323,0.00014837475,0.0006020217,0.0003300564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953892,0.00059693155,0.0007092478,0.00029565615,0.002786831,0.00022212263],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007327438,0.00013495347,0.00022688713,0.0004377729,0.0006205433,0.0335388,0.0013640914,0.00013606908,0.00006246634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027686504,0.000120667166,0.00018928827,0.00010425763,0.00010279146,0.08363183,0.00011266659,0.0013658417,0.0000042900724],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022012653,0.00018173638,0.001328428,0.00003189221,0.0001480257,0.000026341788,0.004450593,0.000017192195,0.00046219456,0.57761943,0.40634263,0.009171443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007388149,0.00012513963,0.0011270373,0.000066695175,0.0000553842,0.000012407042,0.0054860027,0.000023936398,0.0000928895,0.002845285,0.9892731,0.0001533075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044432093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022750843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83685136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023373909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001844497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9674645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232663635","doi":"10.3138/jsp.41.1.12","title":"<i>Choice</i>’s Compilation of Significant University Press Titles for Undergraduates, 2008–2009","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Library science; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0679471021792775,"score_gpt":0.24680371346561733,"score_spread":0.17885661128633984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232663635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46154398,0.012265275,0.0166637,0.12694442,0.0046448708,0.0015087189,0.0011247406,0.00034728946,0.374957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931041,0.00014740576,0.0026358217,0.00029687546,0.00061404577,3.5749406e-7,0.000048190766,0.000012848369,0.0031403594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836963,0.00018782819,0.00057178934,0.00012919254,0.0005476861,0.0001938768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99541366,0.00039937682,0.0010255426,0.00027895244,0.002759175,0.00012330529],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002393223,0.00012413859,0.0002773426,0.00034523953,0.00038149173,0.014207782,0.0010801499,0.00011213288,0.000027254928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020316113,0.00011314975,0.00017511228,0.000118856304,0.00007786305,0.06943155,0.000050577524,0.00089498155,8.990131e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002821996,0.00054238306,0.0029041625,0.00006532976,0.00018597575,0.000006727336,0.007126849,0.00026409765,0.0038770235,0.56921214,0.39706874,0.018464353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001306092,0.00041069405,0.009627478,0.00018564277,0.00010354031,0.000007064896,0.0023895327,0.00026544053,0.00024230078,0.009504492,0.97575665,0.0002010613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002680859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008620038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5786879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012044715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017000061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9868156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232918210","doi":"10.3138/jsp.40.4.329","title":"Why Books Still Matter","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Digital Games and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; History; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.026916229691808187,"score_gpt":0.28144380785381995,"score_spread":0.25452757816201177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232918210","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.089822076,0.0007029031,0.00019795021,0.11161113,0.0011278208,0.00005986259,0.0000018413258,0.000022906132,0.79645354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91354424,0.00009506574,0.0019517065,0.05090599,0.0026476972,4.088624e-7,8.840621e-7,0.000012698823,0.030841308],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981073,0.00008954587,0.00035711256,0.00009486334,0.0010465576,0.00030461993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822885,0.00007908403,0.0003326798,0.00010178527,0.00086924376,0.0003883799],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002685116,0.00007754774,0.00016679012,0.00020413545,0.00009468942,0.032723084,0.00069584197,0.00012739966,0.00025586813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030404432,0.0000643154,0.00013142404,0.00023980952,0.000058346155,0.08566086,0.000031025567,0.0008845606,0.000027234355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027388227,0.0000941181,0.00894199,0.000004041747,0.000026973737,0.000087231085,0.011510625,0.000003642928,0.0003997492,0.0133665195,0.6597485,0.3057892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022793806,0.0000725418,0.0127184065,0.00006377217,0.000010973724,0.000017258233,0.0020340998,4.5039684e-7,0.000024517441,0.004623917,0.98012644,0.000079674566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006859869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044258104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8237222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011367804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023550271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96828103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233038302","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.3.307","title":"Surviving Referees' Reports","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Clinical practice guidelines implementation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Business; Operations management; Engineering","score_opus":0.3155227482419978,"score_gpt":0.43342639385474896,"score_spread":0.11790364561275118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233038302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9614915,0.00042023574,0.0015793603,0.029677415,0.0011382574,0.00011186793,0.0000010343032,0.000028364931,0.0055519408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9763992,0.00015404983,0.017902458,0.0034861504,0.0015559511,7.5916455e-7,0.00000832075,0.000024503603,0.00046862522],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99574727,0.00016910302,0.0022062666,0.00017573302,0.0014783909,0.00022324566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925526,0.0008424989,0.0019918245,0.0003267928,0.003923259,0.00036302823],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010506825,0.00011160853,0.00037832966,0.00036428508,0.00016133783,0.0027593733,0.00019348516,0.00015967588,0.00022333564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.118341565,0.000092506685,0.00019890211,0.00041223687,0.000036553425,0.06260182,0.00009469374,0.0022824702,0.000008506934],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027680036,0.00025701788,0.8484448,0.000031907177,0.00018318638,0.0055213356,0.00050645904,0.000016050275,0.0075082188,0.000103841005,0.11317019,0.023980152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027274885,0.00059739314,0.78191376,0.00030977564,0.0002449839,0.0511679,0.0013315447,0.00003854588,0.000544003,0.00090651744,0.1600256,0.00019248964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001528639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018213295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10783474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020207318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076269667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233492121","doi":"10.3138/jsp.38.1.41","title":"Measures to Shorten Publication Lags for Journals in China","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Time lag; Publishing; Competition (biology); Quality (philosophy); Lag time; Lag; Key (lock); Value (mathematics); Advertising; Computer science; Business; Marketing; Political science; Law; Computer security","score_opus":0.06629847249947945,"score_gpt":0.27678019603522735,"score_spread":0.2104817235357479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233492121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63110054,0.004980357,0.0050462754,0.22205597,0.0025432403,0.0008083169,0.000082252925,0.00012757615,0.13325545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99011904,0.000030598556,0.0035229542,0.0013088961,0.002676033,0.000022669012,0.00003350316,0.000036215755,0.0022500705],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99658835,0.00027478047,0.0013984158,0.00021287783,0.0011159178,0.00040965303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992829,0.00025540323,0.00095713005,0.00040449938,0.0053244676,0.0002294936],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012958595,0.00018596362,0.00037958188,0.0017993831,0.0005253024,0.12226783,0.0018586515,0.000168656,0.00013339843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0112843085,0.00016077943,0.00021592739,0.0004211482,0.000045616416,0.15041594,0.00012534366,0.0018879399,0.000007589899],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024016891,0.0006209328,0.034070227,0.000040772225,0.00011610827,0.000012352547,0.022329617,0.000414043,0.003122021,0.25677067,0.6182881,0.06397501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001176577,0.00018863055,0.08683749,0.0002529613,0.000038888287,0.00004021413,0.0020526855,0.000089126086,0.00010050418,0.03116485,0.8777629,0.0002951897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089278736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016090553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3590185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031527466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025555943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233633637","doi":"10.3138/jsp.36.4.229","title":"History Journals and the Online World: Some Findings from a Recent Survey and Some Observations","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Library science; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.07795333794677294,"score_gpt":0.2552129810902284,"score_spread":0.17725964314345544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233633637","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7681223,0.043527156,0.0004256315,0.18699673,0.00072353455,0.00006563983,0.000013862633,0.000022715416,0.000102433536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7984569,0.0151388,0.10042542,0.07828179,0.005500911,0.0000039742495,0.000026886239,0.000054576092,0.0021107132],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975918,0.00050227373,0.00071545405,0.00022046958,0.0007325882,0.00023744346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99712586,0.0010225545,0.0006787768,0.00028538247,0.0006072121,0.00028021014],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059259403,0.00014667648,0.00031557758,0.00048401236,0.00027159858,0.022874761,0.0016838978,0.00009886757,0.00004283078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016245806,0.00009844655,0.00007078339,0.00049656606,0.00007682,0.2059062,0.00045868388,0.0017061847,0.0000015167801],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041609677,0.00055336335,0.50541216,0.000041640662,0.0006210872,0.000094888,0.017678695,0.00015131527,0.0027586592,0.12191172,0.19753303,0.15282734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001563635,0.00003278078,0.79453826,0.00010555572,0.000018274237,0.000053005777,0.00011908746,0.0015247635,0.000019122826,0.014329607,0.18755667,0.00013924652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020439303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025119024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28912607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014066606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9781396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233910623","doi":"10.3138/jsp.43.2.220","title":"The Impact of Submission Experiences on Perceptions of Journal Quality and Editorial Support: The Viewpoint of Chinese Authors","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Perception; Psychology; Library science; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05559235881788568,"score_gpt":0.34475926520026373,"score_spread":0.2891669063823781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233910623","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31806558,0.0017051089,0.000008629316,0.001607199,0.67560357,0.00014978561,0.00014553215,0.000008835461,0.002705767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45717582,0.0012202414,0.000055117664,0.000014053713,0.5412004,0.000004341345,0.000021716221,0.000030120385,0.00027815506],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99106187,0.0019979465,0.0029166962,0.00021745496,0.003461902,0.00034411435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9757085,0.0038535213,0.008654232,0.0008896712,0.010574756,0.0003193401],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.029503249,0.00037539998,0.0009904385,0.00059344573,0.001489075,0.025719242,0.0035924865,0.00073056086,0.00027175885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049455967,0.00017551667,0.0008926026,0.00021826099,0.0008473504,0.03815666,0.00037822942,0.0088128215,6.960498e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045082948,0.00019469926,0.0014413866,0.000049232513,0.0002648261,0.0000010571014,0.10530787,0.0000039647275,0.00015007608,0.0010938274,0.8894698,0.0015724173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020078456,0.0034805841,0.020771021,0.0015137072,0.00029341746,0.00004665876,0.07544836,0.000007337099,0.00002702846,0.01605352,0.87981534,0.0005351558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014893328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000148816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13911025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020969179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017654904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234038009","doi":"10.3138/jsp.43.4.363","title":"The Price of University Press Books: 2009–2011","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Yankee; Distribution (mathematics); Library science; Sociology; Media studies; History; Computer science; Art history; Mathematics","score_opus":0.054621898201342015,"score_gpt":0.22431423222151833,"score_spread":0.1696923340201763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234038009","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33182052,0.024790773,0.0003920402,0.018544942,0.004171245,0.00022734482,0.000049391463,0.00007264062,0.6199311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985363,0.00040029245,0.0005300477,0.00020017484,0.0011539254,3.6786344e-7,0.0000027199503,0.000014715365,0.012334758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780387,0.0005358985,0.00052391004,0.00007604236,0.0007529859,0.00030731774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99518263,0.0006602629,0.0011068126,0.00042805317,0.0024222585,0.00019998672],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010073297,0.000107584005,0.0001938475,0.00021023765,0.00088960957,0.026188102,0.0020492047,0.00009679615,0.0000825037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003533036,0.00007520869,0.00013359419,0.00008016057,0.00017252262,0.16521901,0.00025796195,0.0017356336,0.0000051919],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016412973,0.00025871472,0.006448054,0.000027971106,0.0002032286,0.0000037731322,0.027125781,0.000006098273,0.00060482655,0.6756874,0.27890325,0.010566791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031010254,0.00006187599,0.006692382,0.00004747611,0.000043142612,0.000015836054,0.007113722,0.000005461126,0.00012779271,0.0005512317,0.98494,0.00009098612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034737407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035361372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70603675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011420739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014681372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9748228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234065122","doi":"10.3138/jsp.35.2.103","title":"Business and Society and Business Ethics Journals: A Citation and Impact Analysis","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Ranking (information retrieval); Argument (complex analysis); Business ethics; Citation; Citation analysis; Philosophy of business; Sociology; Business analysis; Business model; Business; Political science; Public relations; Library science; Computer science; Law; Marketing","score_opus":0.27321684450540296,"score_gpt":0.446308274333392,"score_spread":0.17309142982798903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234065122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8970167,0.005514509,0.040180244,0.05660735,0.00047803947,0.000051528288,0.0000059734643,0.0000075120765,0.0001381295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818585,0.0043459497,0.0123912785,0.0009104439,0.00044810996,7.7131205e-7,0.0000023327223,0.000012694956,0.00002995432],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952587,0.0003073415,0.0011509362,0.00034228704,0.0026910137,0.0002497294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761066,0.0031225013,0.0016364681,0.00026246725,0.018510021,0.00036196213],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03522678,0.00018633713,0.00051874964,0.0015255149,0.0007517857,0.0666363,0.0005274144,0.00045487995,0.000027919074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09859168,0.00012798843,0.00016349171,0.006486841,0.00024171128,0.07292329,0.00019288914,0.0026469964,6.950475e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001338055,0.00022678566,0.85002655,0.00016128733,0.00120585,0.00003654195,0.05156407,0.009519672,0.0022720594,0.00847116,0.0026983211,0.073683895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000634624,0.000029844961,0.8759437,0.00019234011,0.00025423578,0.0002687444,0.0065086493,0.00019809604,0.000007257611,0.115398146,0.00042391167,0.00014042357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040556386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012727418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.106926985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014785878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011818032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234605218","doi":"10.3138/jsp.37.3.230","title":"Research Journals: Toward Uniformity or Retaining Diversity?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Writing and Publishing","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Subject (documents); Style (visual arts); Library science; Sociology; Computer science; Geography; Archaeology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.24646641135154562,"score_gpt":0.34036810630518816,"score_spread":0.09390169495364253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234605218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5565484,0.0035283235,0.00028203308,0.033379078,0.0018079351,0.00012402308,0.000025604737,0.00010047507,0.40420413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979309,0.00010221616,0.00073646515,0.0006713486,0.011819006,8.8647084e-7,0.000004952276,0.00003195461,0.0073241424],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99410456,0.0006104423,0.0011947148,0.00024677758,0.0030694297,0.0007740884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906683,0.0010089293,0.0010424494,0.0002248346,0.0067171413,0.00033831928],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.030027471,0.00020213077,0.00042961267,0.0015258276,0.0028923792,0.08781979,0.0021295438,0.00031395847,0.0013559525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01081449,0.00015003729,0.00024162317,0.00051603065,0.00027561016,0.15144275,0.0009287689,0.008417131,0.000019006968],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003409937,0.00019507797,0.07882286,0.00011117595,0.0001683554,0.0005964184,0.061647203,0.00009815089,0.00011554591,0.22236796,0.619267,0.016269285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013452616,0.0002965232,0.00898009,0.00088299456,0.00007436126,0.0004948707,0.08685841,0.000057720874,0.000054113552,0.03987436,0.8606885,0.00039278515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017513047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025646566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42276064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003670411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050421606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234626190","doi":"10.3138/jsp.35.3.172","title":"Diary of a Dissertation Writer: Journals as a Map to a Discipline","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Publishing; Field (mathematics); Value (mathematics); Key (lock); Sociology; Epistemology; History; Social science; Political science; Computer science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021348958073144613,"score_gpt":0.31630804368177395,"score_spread":0.2949590856086293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234626190","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91593856,0.0018730725,0.0007820817,0.07121566,0.0010694709,0.000117953954,0.000010395962,0.000011710454,0.008981105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99453956,0.0001481541,0.0020627151,0.0006778046,0.00091694866,0.0000014518225,0.0000012218638,0.00001219838,0.001639972],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976711,0.00015922078,0.00061502575,0.00010391945,0.0012109469,0.00023974797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972212,0.000099945784,0.00062229263,0.00011387463,0.001361612,0.0005810867],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050990502,0.00007013216,0.00022416966,0.001509307,0.0006686049,0.022952557,0.0006966247,0.00012614357,0.00024525987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007393429,0.000077034376,0.00017219066,0.00080078124,0.00010882164,0.04515676,0.000045196593,0.00080018566,0.000021591948],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005831873,0.0010217373,0.035434213,0.00019727953,0.00042996384,0.00085265766,0.5815113,0.0011159725,0.031211123,0.15526967,0.08094261,0.111430295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002198083,0.0004914453,0.12946992,0.0018773846,0.00014882468,0.00011851431,0.05698449,0.0000021148185,0.00026578442,0.06898898,0.7389681,0.0004863805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06935074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20372659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6580255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009947106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020045873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97806174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234730809","doi":"10.1353/scp.2005.0020","title":"Herding Cats: The View from the Volume and Series Editor","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Herding; Publishing; Plague (disease); Sociology; Volume (thermodynamics); Library science; Social science; History; Political science; Law; Computer science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.36834079132810094,"score_gpt":0.4825268289956465,"score_spread":0.11418603766754554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234730809","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61660606,0.030480098,0.0013427282,0.34306479,0.0061687473,0.00014370581,0.000026551439,0.0000110951405,0.002156243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9737337,0.001601854,0.0032460766,0.002971091,0.016688844,0.0000020505709,7.3660703e-7,0.00001462127,0.0017410152],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870357,0.00057628175,0.0010269821,0.00030002213,0.010651668,0.00040938304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810392,0.00837975,0.000982341,0.000651776,0.008506033,0.00044088953],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07506255,0.00012480674,0.00028721054,0.0075222063,0.0009200902,0.2350358,0.0054393015,0.0001372683,0.00031700914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1816296,0.000052438296,0.00015423668,0.042812586,0.00019728128,0.10896567,0.0010693881,0.002130181,0.000050904677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001565018,0.000023193257,0.11240533,9.71311e-7,0.000029718944,0.0000072503753,0.00077007763,0.000016606642,0.00024630307,0.00028115636,0.60025644,0.28594732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022781936,0.000059240825,0.13892668,0.000026490916,0.000010973346,0.000069505244,0.0033402233,0.00027784734,0.000047675207,0.0045476067,0.85239273,0.00007319054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016265025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053020358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35712767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001329816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002990528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994177},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4234878668","doi":"10.3138/jsp.36.1.43","title":"Mail Call","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.030390878806889503,"score_gpt":0.25936823468246856,"score_spread":0.22897735587557905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234878668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9512605,0.0016528234,0.0016811328,0.018304443,0.0013624157,0.000099760386,0.000017299733,0.00010586884,0.025515765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97771597,0.000019906678,0.019012192,0.0013731119,0.0014140139,8.93115e-7,0.0000026112984,0.00009450751,0.00036682223],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996027,0.0001500866,0.0009908439,0.00019922099,0.0021244488,0.0005084084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946986,0.00009871772,0.0011621735,0.00033054128,0.0031173355,0.0005926486],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007654533,0.00019929626,0.0003620236,0.0009340113,0.00020750353,0.054115195,0.0015732808,0.00025093168,0.00011797419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012223585,0.00017073785,0.00027224966,0.0010199295,0.000060521328,0.2478586,0.0001782341,0.0039388635,0.000582844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00086375466,0.0015771174,0.10856416,0.0000971011,0.001040135,0.00467758,0.007463648,0.007684401,0.28871098,0.049655117,0.5036024,0.026063642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018322531,0.0010824207,0.22951743,0.0014145438,0.0003602768,0.0094000455,0.0026559483,0.000028826611,0.010686081,0.07502478,0.6501267,0.0013803979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000127225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033421773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27802488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009927406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076844177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235104076","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.1.44","title":"MLA Regional Journals: Accountability, Innovation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Face (sociological concept); Accountability; Duty; Position (finance); Public relations; Scale (ratio); Political science; Business; Sociology; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.15884791084427377,"score_gpt":0.32738069560620847,"score_spread":0.1685327847619347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235104076","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84210277,0.0027546089,0.0014560368,0.027356394,0.0025482194,0.00011336183,0.000008631154,0.00006064372,0.12359931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896177,0.00007361589,0.0017705205,0.0029780224,0.0041744085,0.0000010645174,0.000016412176,0.000029402,0.0013388694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995528,0.0002453922,0.0018312484,0.00018582762,0.0018047203,0.00040480535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98565197,0.0007504304,0.002028291,0.0004744729,0.010882503,0.00021235252],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.030052798,0.00018996066,0.00034075606,0.0018610571,0.0008325242,0.110071525,0.0019397064,0.00022501095,0.00073366973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0133142155,0.00016056163,0.00018725387,0.0007127583,0.0001660663,0.24946842,0.00019728408,0.00401474,0.0000184681],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030579974,0.00054411445,0.03983411,0.00004462597,0.00026249196,0.00003601347,0.03987531,0.000017953533,0.0052129724,0.612574,0.22513354,0.07615911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008887376,0.00014024987,0.029369006,0.00022740473,0.00004704445,0.0002226464,0.011863625,0.00001212908,0.00013841764,0.028654292,0.9281719,0.0002645607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019109293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031285704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70303833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003703834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035057805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99876475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235141251","doi":"10.3138/jsp.35.4.183","title":"The Place of Belletristic Writing in Scholarly Publishing: The Council of Editors of Learned Journals Keynote Addresses MLA Convention 2003","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Memoir; Convention; Poetry; Literary magazine; History; Law; Literature; Library science; Media studies; Sociology; Art history; Literary criticism; Art; Political science; Computer science; Literary science","score_opus":0.12735795757980714,"score_gpt":0.28268243376168645,"score_spread":0.1553244761818793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235141251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86677486,0.037061,0.0003765971,0.057133984,0.0070030834,0.0006078425,0.0001161948,0.00004543724,0.03088102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99515873,0.00095756666,0.00046150677,0.00022014926,0.002369446,0.0000059147483,0.000010673787,0.000043198925,0.0007727939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98965186,0.001413,0.00359736,0.0002772128,0.0044925218,0.00056802906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9616758,0.00274595,0.006286684,0.0009032135,0.02816939,0.00021895082],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.048609015,0.00030271747,0.00077493145,0.0009142803,0.0011966643,0.09424478,0.004290589,0.00036494268,0.00009236799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1402201,0.00020218211,0.00036560273,0.0012793842,0.00063782436,0.19833948,0.00043325755,0.006642178,0.0000018770597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002339151,0.002725567,0.053489674,0.0010155496,0.0019841243,0.00007842941,0.23000576,0.005613411,0.0125825945,0.49071085,0.16400109,0.035453804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012625252,0.0015600492,0.042370614,0.009103623,0.0006430806,0.00022048516,0.13568304,0.00026480976,0.0028412307,0.060049992,0.7335583,0.0010795196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002251782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010175221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5695572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010254973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004716365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235283827","doi":"10.3138/jsp.35.2.122","title":"Review","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.04565202930739408,"score_gpt":0.2953168078852015,"score_spread":0.2496647785778074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235283827","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18277869,0.6220366,0.0018065091,0.1402735,0.0027115745,0.00048626176,0.000027680737,0.00023115659,0.049648028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85422087,0.027004264,0.057565033,0.055729788,0.004671097,0.0000064429732,0.000012328686,0.00035213196,0.00043802106],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99665296,0.00016926997,0.0010905433,0.00015883081,0.001571237,0.0003571392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99419284,0.00007384814,0.0014166961,0.00033313714,0.0035508468,0.00043264497],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010877288,0.0001651599,0.00044236417,0.0005386394,0.00014018959,0.027328905,0.0014221509,0.00013508282,0.00016534564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022933397,0.00013361723,0.00030004588,0.0012275934,0.000038580616,0.24258111,0.00013397212,0.0031342467,0.0005403904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092539194,0.00044429462,0.00726179,0.0009016766,0.0003387964,0.0007374381,0.00063604163,0.0002838959,0.022796687,0.013625659,0.9259056,0.026975585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031374323,0.00025329515,0.0101346355,0.018569263,0.00024589637,0.003658311,0.00021026519,0.0000010321787,0.0008138495,0.01675836,0.94583017,0.00038750618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003102635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000055821256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6714422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061668054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062933646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99916553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235485206","doi":"10.3138/jsp.34.1.59","title":"Letter to the Editor","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Veterinary Practice and Education Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.2676454900705807,"score_gpt":0.4373109470343353,"score_spread":0.16966545696375462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235485206","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042846065,0.00079011766,0.000102319864,0.91497296,0.067685306,0.0002998049,0.000018822228,0.00002217322,0.015680026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00013941937,0.00010624496,0.0008299574,0.6207012,0.35818323,0.00002667585,0.0000063490593,0.00004012983,0.019966772],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942718,0.0016541211,0.0013753365,0.0002529661,0.0017542554,0.0006915247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99063617,0.002686686,0.0022283855,0.0005816729,0.0036813407,0.00018577183],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074037514,0.0002774356,0.0005464533,0.00060077175,0.0017271619,0.008770492,0.0017733569,0.0012413771,0.0011882782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01291,0.00016973368,0.00024926258,0.0004860691,0.00003561286,0.043455426,0.00046053092,0.0355737,0.0010237701],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014004804,0.000016912818,0.0012489068,0.00008687149,0.0001434176,0.00014529082,0.004456009,8.723519e-7,0.0000060327347,0.000005502016,0.99313504,0.00074115145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025824187,0.00011915947,0.0020763315,0.0004997216,0.00010915941,0.00008395076,0.0022286586,4.951e-7,1.0813973e-7,0.00006103064,0.99438435,0.00017879109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000587895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000053386166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29427177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047501698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005961472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235574992","doi":"10.3138/jsp.40.1.97","title":"On the Author's Addendum","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institutes of Health; Scheme for Promotion of Academic and Research Collaboration","keywords":"Publishing; Addendum; Revenue; Variety (cybernetics); Negotiation; Political science; Public relations; Law; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; Accounting","score_opus":0.08722235853751659,"score_gpt":0.22897023045541334,"score_spread":0.14174787191789676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235574992","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5316501,0.0003956362,0.0002683814,0.063218266,0.002090824,0.00011283086,6.0846327e-7,0.0000524147,0.40221092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805101,0.00001517088,0.00008248285,0.011694604,0.004841373,0.0000011708856,0.0000010043285,0.000020342823,0.0028337245],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822253,0.000031096264,0.00045705136,0.00013124186,0.00091671856,0.0002413892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974756,0.00022213365,0.0005160969,0.00021739147,0.0015401761,0.000028557177],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025427223,0.00013729525,0.00018582652,0.0004268013,0.0006206166,0.022299092,0.0010648281,0.00010182823,0.0033717186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011595462,0.00007128057,0.00017640062,0.00063521124,0.000060120354,0.09390315,0.00018055348,0.0017459358,0.0003298934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060277463,0.000049015624,0.00087850547,0.0000061746714,0.000029933763,0.00004864508,0.00014994657,0.000003817967,0.00031141922,0.0143804895,0.9813547,0.0027270627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004960414,0.00006592977,0.006035623,0.00013038698,0.000034172674,0.00009589959,0.00041502624,0.0012196789,0.00016895121,0.017211579,0.9739259,0.00020082812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009295778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006406493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44886002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052769534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007301592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99753934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235608027","doi":"10.1353/scp.2012.0019","title":"Giving It Away: Sharing and the Future of Scholarly Communication","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Business; Knowledge management; Internet privacy; Public relations; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.019902299065603223,"score_gpt":0.23396252939795417,"score_spread":0.21406023033235094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235608027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.796812,0.05020222,0.0071313754,0.13653915,0.0012414908,0.00014401542,0.0000016634874,0.00004410462,0.007883971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9742814,0.00049763976,0.02220182,0.0021280039,0.00077481475,0.0000010466538,6.4734246e-7,0.000009776502,0.00010489264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789333,0.000332697,0.0006199238,0.00013204194,0.0007631579,0.00025883672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997132,0.00032110713,0.00094857585,0.00065818196,0.0007399368,0.00020021138],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009110476,0.00011956283,0.00026084945,0.00027548894,0.0003549506,0.04944977,0.0039732433,0.00013640866,0.000013903122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073350687,0.000078276316,0.00010724051,0.00057905016,0.00006203088,0.4201479,0.0012640292,0.0019445914,0.0000016589963],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073509626,0.00012229866,0.40133733,0.00011318162,0.00017466684,0.0000052248947,0.024715954,0.000028989987,0.0010880531,0.5208123,0.0051882514,0.046340287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0052248845,0.00018569594,0.6080362,0.0011896202,0.00011038012,0.00075719913,0.01364378,0.0057919086,0.0008100456,0.04584186,0.31778613,0.00062225235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055750676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007997982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4749704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003227225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009105811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.951537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235681144","doi":"10.3138/jsp.41.3.340","title":"Navigating and Expanding the MLA International Bibliography","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Lexicography and Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliography; Search engine indexing; Consistency (knowledge bases); Computer science; Index (typography); Library science; World Wide Web; Range (aeronautics); Volume (thermodynamics); Information retrieval; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.024290357146182925,"score_gpt":0.2731355752462442,"score_spread":0.24884521810006127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235681144","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9508405,0.0017505434,0.000022687582,0.012938679,0.003147447,0.000040198476,0.0000075353805,0.000019088573,0.031233318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949101,0.0002698911,0.0004814079,0.0009052691,0.003364718,0.0000014989896,0.0000011048604,0.000009069523,0.000056899244],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989278,0.000041091447,0.00032356833,0.0000888452,0.00047102183,0.00014770337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845135,0.0002121382,0.00037282688,0.00009214384,0.0007996965,0.00007185084],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019848691,0.00009192624,0.000117389325,0.00085446367,0.00072668947,0.036561288,0.0004974566,0.00004888127,0.00025341532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008571128,0.000053653148,0.00013874854,0.00044427454,0.00023513593,0.03448143,0.00011788282,0.0024263214,8.456398e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000789826,0.00014717868,0.2544355,0.000045580487,0.0011079456,0.000102768325,0.3270717,0.0000021641426,0.0064054667,0.21409063,0.07746467,0.1190474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012096382,0.00014105569,0.0390369,0.00037095588,0.00012170416,0.0002986286,0.120853394,0.000016629381,0.00027287076,0.015094985,0.8222491,0.00033409765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012950556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016432785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7447845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000041300955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014655304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235739005","doi":"10.3138/jsp.35.1.40","title":"Scribble, Scribble Toil and Trouble: Forced Productivity in the Modern University","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Higher Education Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Variety (cybernetics); Sociology; Economics; Computer science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.030732997850725276,"score_gpt":0.26777646764548596,"score_spread":0.23704346979476068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235739005","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.925896,0.0006402812,0.00041596888,0.0372351,0.0005786474,0.0001383526,0.0000023197047,0.000008770685,0.035084583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99392366,0.00015487806,0.0018992597,0.00061244983,0.00018795625,6.148583e-7,3.3605176e-7,0.000004402407,0.003216447],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980429,0.0005145168,0.00022737768,0.00013762509,0.0008404027,0.00023721645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987176,0.00013607767,0.00027892223,0.00011430366,0.0006325128,0.00012057718],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077645686,0.00007095696,0.00013270891,0.00016479837,0.0005001238,0.0047771386,0.000475736,0.000086554064,0.00003088711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003153152,0.000056384422,0.00003808637,0.00063690176,0.00007415716,0.040069167,0.000027741888,0.0007527007,0.0000015617886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012661428,0.00050989765,0.39751273,0.00003045167,0.00007924198,0.00009151141,0.24312809,0.00008597907,0.00070441613,0.23425356,0.09185623,0.031621262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010187661,0.00004419153,0.1518078,0.00006883706,0.00001834442,0.000032360393,0.03572325,0.0000049035343,0.00007063292,0.02141041,0.78962475,0.00017574696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009687683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076293404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6977685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029687356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011232172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235826356","doi":"10.3138/jsp.40.1.21","title":"University Presses 2008: A Snapshot in Time","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Theme (computing); Luck; Narrative; Media studies; Snapshot (computer storage); Metaphor; History; Sociology; Library science; Political science; Law; Art; Computer science; Literature","score_opus":0.05149378495529513,"score_gpt":0.20910717753566208,"score_spread":0.15761339258036694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235826356","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8533676,0.0015712365,0.000028492099,0.00895125,0.0004539722,0.00007429529,0.000013625147,0.000036081816,0.13550344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926233,0.00028735748,0.0007633684,0.00036567147,0.0006056359,3.567756e-7,0.000025822479,0.00001577694,0.005312684],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997957,0.00034609748,0.00051326124,0.0001387846,0.0007945391,0.00025029728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972755,0.0002450538,0.0005283768,0.00031095935,0.0014729943,0.00016715575],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003104142,0.00012688896,0.00026944405,0.00083787955,0.0005395885,0.02563162,0.0019376946,0.00012801403,0.0010695353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029664452,0.000118195945,0.00012819456,0.00025527278,0.00013885353,0.17685461,0.00021441083,0.0022634396,0.000026140922],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004382767,0.0010668783,0.1349895,0.000043959073,0.00023253507,0.00073115533,0.081806906,0.00012884616,0.0019973977,0.045830265,0.7275576,0.0051767016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011596356,0.000113986716,0.036247384,0.0001572045,0.000022415321,0.00017345943,0.002462203,0.000038302744,0.000025623774,0.0015097348,0.9578816,0.00020842112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047205025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018845272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23032404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019597678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028783866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235882921","doi":"10.3138/jsp.36.2.75","title":"<i>Ad Astra per Aspera:</i> University Press of Kansas, 1946-2005","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"ASTRA; Physics","score_opus":0.02377302315279152,"score_gpt":0.2617207656325791,"score_spread":0.23794774247978762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235882921","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18101497,0.0023305297,0.0022241625,0.053454407,0.0009187226,0.00013085516,0.00009470787,0.000038263235,0.7597934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811434,0.00030070858,0.008996646,0.000742728,0.0010905906,8.0057816e-8,0.0000015076738,0.000006501811,0.0077178003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979614,0.0002531285,0.00035787112,0.00010326837,0.0010092449,0.00031506672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99752957,0.00020860456,0.00048603638,0.000109465705,0.0013204888,0.00034584367],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023884194,0.00008605877,0.00021244083,0.00015356978,0.0004070009,0.0025819393,0.0007793169,0.00014277079,0.00019885249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011891726,0.00008415541,0.00015362901,0.00020218058,0.0004650228,0.03799138,0.00005979759,0.00090131996,0.0000043679584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050646733,0.0001431399,0.0046222983,0.000009617683,0.00009237683,0.000027085624,0.0024602958,0.0002124153,0.00044900746,0.94728243,0.036439873,0.00821078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030032164,0.000033421144,0.0018299139,0.000039538576,0.000037517668,0.000017972841,0.0033636428,0.0000026403402,0.000053534593,0.00009329544,0.9941387,0.00008947613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001222083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002665039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9576988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033570552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024364344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235915932","doi":"10.3138/jsp.42.1.31","title":"Where Will the Next Generation of Publishers Come From?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Excellence; Public relations; Process (computing); Workforce; Work (physics); Marketing; Business; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; Engineering; Economic growth","score_opus":0.10361098823899757,"score_gpt":0.25408554946464335,"score_spread":0.1504745612256458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235915932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.918198,0.0023451762,0.000094980016,0.044017356,0.0045523536,0.000111978276,0.00002820235,0.000036190726,0.0306158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926817,0.00008048136,0.0014239657,0.00088277244,0.0040320614,0.0000030924477,0.000033930824,0.000027645383,0.0008343741],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970067,0.00037074072,0.0010303098,0.00016962444,0.0011740365,0.00024859433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929735,0.0004997606,0.0014861415,0.00076962315,0.0040921206,0.00017883847],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063978527,0.0001713136,0.00032040113,0.00038784582,0.00072950264,0.1631819,0.0028739553,0.00022296762,0.0011280745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007091369,0.0001176161,0.00022912149,0.00021001823,0.00025145832,0.3343878,0.00022453172,0.0046868837,0.0000057208367],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086037595,0.00038983568,0.018762093,0.000039810035,0.00045232428,0.000011062435,0.056982696,0.00004175291,0.0840635,0.27847245,0.51919955,0.041498877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008588122,0.0001236516,0.006189949,0.00012135849,0.00009830033,0.000028610162,0.010292691,0.00034111988,0.0003380196,0.009341858,0.97202206,0.00024357511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001129431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023582722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4528225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006553937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027915568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235919858","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.3.241","title":"Acknowledging Clio's Lesser Children: The Importance of Journals for Historical Research and Scholarship","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Discipline; Comparative historical research; Publishing; Scholarly communication; Sociology; Social science; Flexibility (engineering); History; Political science; Law; Management","score_opus":0.2976134847979864,"score_gpt":0.3551479964625026,"score_spread":0.05753451166451623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235919858","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9436545,0.025181782,0.00011149813,0.02483285,0.0007612775,0.00022664966,0.000012515087,0.000019221578,0.0051997122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939353,0.00081203145,0.001111989,0.00035566173,0.0022253382,0.000008024832,0.000004485506,0.00003336554,0.001513842],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99594474,0.0006209092,0.001268022,0.00021824651,0.0015165522,0.0004315324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98701596,0.0014113728,0.001260084,0.0005499182,0.00952241,0.00024024441],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.024806218,0.00016974752,0.0004362019,0.0008720121,0.002598843,0.02799408,0.0022129298,0.00018523177,0.00006794726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020982422,0.00011676374,0.00021415933,0.00037437188,0.00044000527,0.08860404,0.0003116359,0.004875461,0.0000016995804],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027558053,0.00045194427,0.6877812,0.0000724045,0.00032061612,0.00001790975,0.033162624,0.0000075708454,0.001159806,0.11161755,0.15598322,0.009149528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033476357,0.0011080785,0.3908963,0.0009588825,0.00014240947,0.001015241,0.0077015124,0.000042044456,0.00039732363,0.07551543,0.5182853,0.00058991957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010913136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013859336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36230204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036677884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043432834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99869967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235997437","doi":"10.3138/d124-4482-1h75-6642","title":"On the Innovative Spirits of Academic Journal Editors","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pace; Competition (biology); Selection (genetic algorithm); Sociology; Process (computing); Engineering ethics; Computer science; Knowledge management; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06623520531161456,"score_gpt":0.28284473283691675,"score_spread":0.2166095275253022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235997437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8657106,0.0012164947,0.0004139169,0.048258416,0.008442377,0.00011291846,0.0000107108135,0.00002440354,0.07581017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98505014,0.00006262742,0.00031974787,0.001911846,0.011995102,6.472509e-7,0.0000025488494,0.00002391445,0.0006333987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99578834,0.0003982176,0.001546157,0.000119209144,0.0017909119,0.00035718214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864659,0.0017570578,0.0026886857,0.0003756461,0.008510222,0.00020249766],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.028291054,0.00017982276,0.00032231733,0.0010354463,0.0009042045,0.035149094,0.0027189914,0.00023324469,0.00023635164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027221838,0.0001117943,0.00019040398,0.000533479,0.00025177552,0.10681121,0.0001804736,0.009706179,0.00000759173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017678514,0.00014825322,0.0030979258,0.000012803938,0.00019336266,0.000021802687,0.029741185,0.000017070292,0.0014030039,0.5296534,0.42143047,0.014103975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012088665,0.00069212937,0.01253787,0.0008275167,0.00006198963,0.00020728259,0.026343098,0.000011591675,0.0011110066,0.061896708,0.89478797,0.00031399558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044953842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022659919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47335747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020900411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039377186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99257845},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4236062734","doi":"10.3138/jsp.37.2.136","title":"What Happens When the Author Does Not Provide an Abstract","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Generality; Disadvantage; Search engine indexing; Computer science; World Wide Web; Management; Artificial intelligence; Economics","score_opus":0.06708405637396002,"score_gpt":0.2677051018352893,"score_spread":0.20062104546132925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236062734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78413856,0.0019593213,0.00004293409,0.16596822,0.004645868,0.0002244801,0.000026247631,0.000117234136,0.04287711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982052,0.00005177956,0.0006769077,0.0020627438,0.0044668326,0.0000056010035,0.000025896235,0.00003854422,0.010619666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99644023,0.00041157863,0.0011663454,0.00022919741,0.0013543977,0.00039826435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946215,0.00043715554,0.00137223,0.00076867704,0.0025984403,0.00020200366],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01071546,0.00022584166,0.00030396093,0.0003988053,0.001476784,0.3714644,0.0029832674,0.00018154326,0.00042232347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028968481,0.00012624385,0.0002295448,0.0001028032,0.00019882745,0.43333828,0.00020742926,0.0036489316,0.000024962692],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023223096,0.0006621702,0.0060846107,0.000059364265,0.0002472027,0.00007612806,0.117672846,0.00010264423,0.0052123466,0.5247838,0.28763586,0.057230826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051782926,0.00012336367,0.012061373,0.00020619782,0.00006562595,0.000053911535,0.028113011,0.000054232743,0.0002356903,0.042028278,0.9162792,0.00026127585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017833398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031817474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62864333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015670115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026834357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982315},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"reporting","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"reporting","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4236071253","doi":"10.3138/jsp.36.1.15","title":"Scholarship and Silence","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Educational Philosophies and Pedagogies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Silence; Sociology; Political science; Aesthetics; Art; Law","score_opus":0.10095333627027529,"score_gpt":0.3612576455828944,"score_spread":0.2603043093126191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236071253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82275665,0.003403481,0.000056304023,0.15403844,0.000673446,0.000040689396,0.0000014709682,0.000014647397,0.01901485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923748,0.0007518957,0.0037062967,0.0013069152,0.001696343,5.5858067e-7,3.7164435e-7,0.0000062311856,0.00015659259],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845576,0.0001110805,0.00028676027,0.00009576356,0.0008587032,0.00019193279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99795777,0.00020502378,0.00029286585,0.000081419705,0.0012066838,0.00025622905],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004290902,0.00006525361,0.00011912332,0.00021059315,0.0005750763,0.018690646,0.0005346602,0.00012029793,0.000045906527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010862957,0.00005826895,0.000055794695,0.00032188641,0.00016190746,0.08243299,0.000054979864,0.0010147267,0.0000046391165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028877404,0.00009599633,0.084289335,0.000018012946,0.000042658285,0.000029029681,0.034077033,0.000060848273,0.00055599975,0.86288625,0.0022231427,0.01569281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005505943,0.000089981026,0.11730438,0.00021730439,0.000020456704,0.000057784255,0.03223462,1.3814555e-7,0.00006256913,0.750252,0.099056445,0.00015372047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004132063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000797277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16961813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014321138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007716506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99746895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236122237","doi":"10.3138/jsp.42.2.142","title":"Becoming an Ethical Scholarly Writer","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Identity (music); Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Socialization; Ethical code; Engineering ethics; Information ethics; Epistemology; Social science; Computer science; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08999703686101351,"score_gpt":0.41159696758955183,"score_spread":0.3215999307285383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236122237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5542726,0.000043580803,0.00031431127,0.39280173,0.003561467,0.000058298818,0.0000019257204,0.000032309406,0.04891379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9551204,0.000015813375,0.024798915,0.014902224,0.0040909164,0.0000016190481,0.0000026848684,0.00001578298,0.0010516851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99677056,0.00062575546,0.0006559924,0.00015855551,0.0014770258,0.0003121314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920324,0.00069117325,0.00072867406,0.00025588932,0.005753571,0.00053827243],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.022050813,0.000098045406,0.00016658663,0.0005325635,0.0012121529,0.13657412,0.001274445,0.0007031452,0.0011439935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07828744,0.000091225884,0.000099621626,0.0009842808,0.00014582113,0.35219327,0.000059628295,0.017334275,0.000032596396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005501218,0.00044977848,0.0601469,0.000009151124,0.000073518444,0.000035816254,0.09074011,0.0000036680574,0.019778717,0.71394753,0.060446557,0.05431324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035597078,0.000052038296,0.02072006,0.000025311228,0.000023097151,0.00005454923,0.017553901,0.000007485495,0.0000740315,0.01234253,0.948647,0.00014398487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013517785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014065847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88820046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000122847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024971347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236343093","doi":"10.3138/jsp.41.1.31","title":"Authorship Renounced","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Medical Research and Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Point (geometry); Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.229348412769045,"score_gpt":0.5104076968470622,"score_spread":0.2810592840780172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236343093","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30241042,0.003684172,0.002072356,0.408439,0.0024162943,0.0002958536,0.0000052912815,0.000060933307,0.28061566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9689815,0.0004533204,0.0056423033,0.014619916,0.003647107,0.0000021909536,0.0000032232492,0.000013726835,0.0066367364],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947097,0.0016636912,0.000922561,0.00012791295,0.0019745408,0.00060160767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99273527,0.002328802,0.0010304683,0.00021986077,0.0026535501,0.0010320665],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.027427973,0.00009645469,0.00027256407,0.00037126042,0.00066215417,0.0049672252,0.00092057907,0.00037906764,0.0013796586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16524251,0.000067628716,0.00010087859,0.00051351835,0.000028090199,0.075307645,0.00007585503,0.009862443,0.0001212757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077550067,0.00017268097,0.022611765,0.00008360441,0.00007414988,0.00030748936,0.005689646,0.000002072184,0.0054779905,0.020728854,0.7308268,0.21324947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014050434,0.0006055667,0.06573669,0.00062100973,0.000024167299,0.00004074195,0.0024099546,0.000017032788,0.000040901647,0.05037057,0.878609,0.00011930621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042896245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009562681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6665711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019907195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015015869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236446833","doi":"10.3138/jsp.34.2.65","title":"The Future of Scholarly Publishing: MLA Ad Hoc Committee on the Future of Scholarly Publishing","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Permission; Library science; Scholarly communication; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.043291411931902994,"score_gpt":0.24177564625060555,"score_spread":0.19848423431870255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236446833","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35272664,0.11481337,0.000105602914,0.36376873,0.013580057,0.0010309515,0.00029084223,0.00022655394,0.15345725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9758476,0.0043818527,0.0018455539,0.006629948,0.0072214394,0.000035050856,0.00008129629,0.00021722546,0.0037400106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98128194,0.004991644,0.0042275167,0.0008619161,0.0071319267,0.0015050493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95856947,0.0042608697,0.007038784,0.0036675665,0.025590891,0.0008724061],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05408573,0.0009658398,0.0014355764,0.0019273749,0.0049615772,0.63621753,0.0148939965,0.001427747,0.00044255677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06719838,0.00061191723,0.0012066591,0.001965426,0.00088370417,0.66429627,0.001132931,0.026558045,0.00001921843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030896056,0.00049127324,0.0046548718,0.000085759784,0.00060408225,0.000020326646,0.017445773,0.000019115821,0.0005710503,0.6549717,0.28025794,0.04056913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020482556,0.0005803431,0.005300696,0.0006652452,0.00021626955,0.000107239015,0.06386035,0.000017637492,0.0002505266,0.033544626,0.8927887,0.00062011706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027583836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010391228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62312096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067471224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018012624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236500495","doi":"10.3138/jsp.36.3.169","title":"Maleficium Intra Muros","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Genital Health and Disease","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.03010777581663179,"score_gpt":0.29400688494268895,"score_spread":0.2638991091260572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236500495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9222274,0.0037336312,0.00014513341,0.051869504,0.00047403772,0.000108551845,0.0000044230505,0.000024984383,0.021412332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806719,0.000021333934,0.00573842,0.010060852,0.0024582844,9.3322404e-7,0.0000032260796,0.000017185384,0.0010279001],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980785,0.000047270187,0.0006214926,0.000114276,0.0008231748,0.00031526876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99710315,0.00005795817,0.00032375002,0.0001796549,0.0012841385,0.0010513505],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015183984,0.00010560993,0.00024736288,0.00036802003,0.00009633503,0.004306527,0.00025218396,0.0001402524,0.00028246784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003935302,0.00008393494,0.00016292128,0.00027996185,0.00002281633,0.0345433,0.000042805597,0.0016273754,0.00006334179],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027626895,0.0016900817,0.32738906,0.0006558711,0.00012684782,0.00171193,0.0014584662,0.000097235985,0.014459833,0.0023100947,0.3134663,0.33387154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008078905,0.0012376728,0.48932302,0.00031940493,0.0003205374,0.004544141,0.0012090518,0.00020694995,0.001443905,0.0008919521,0.49210444,0.00032004272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011958831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000027626563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33355153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017522958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062648626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967271},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4236511230","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0087","title":"Voice and Vision: A Guide to Writing History and Other Serious Nonfiction (review)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Craft; Paragraph; Context (archaeology); Sentence; Argument (complex analysis); Judgement; Literature; Visual arts; Linguistics; History; Computer science; Art; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029976838739365155,"score_gpt":0.28213650287106457,"score_spread":0.25215966413169943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236511230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70076686,0.07680234,0.0001677582,0.07037764,0.0038948504,0.00036443365,0.000016993132,0.000120484634,0.14748861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9385479,0.0034166572,0.011797532,0.03415166,0.00495712,0.000014664577,0.000007780166,0.00009525502,0.007011433],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816066,0.00017540532,0.00071501057,0.00018851834,0.00055714924,0.00020323765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99701774,0.00019752026,0.00057112944,0.00032568118,0.0015883186,0.0002996309],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006912825,0.00014865832,0.0002755651,0.00038751357,0.00045086912,0.02612205,0.00063969055,0.00011964779,0.00021767075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004897468,0.00012805162,0.00007060728,0.00008102799,0.00009703512,0.07120933,0.0002061908,0.0025109092,0.0000073966476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005444928,0.00012614731,0.0054397406,0.00027144907,0.000090987945,0.000019746438,0.02291637,0.0000012206996,0.008829705,0.040080294,0.7841991,0.1379708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032832957,0.00011464154,0.004274383,0.00065947167,0.000040655592,0.00019308967,0.0011958219,0.000019517009,0.0000069928406,0.00028847548,0.9927269,0.0001517198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038002266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005869661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.237781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000119980716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013038985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997903},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4236680203","doi":"10.3138/jsp.36.2.115","title":"How to Be a Successful Scholar: Publish Efficiently","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Writing and Publishing","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Advice (programming); Publishing; Computer science; Frustration; World Wide Web; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Programming language","score_opus":0.046016592138304585,"score_gpt":0.2478002016848675,"score_spread":0.2017836095465629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236680203","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5163023,0.0017985695,0.00042881517,0.39326924,0.0025694622,0.00018951383,0.000048406066,0.00015841913,0.08523527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9459785,0.00002577641,0.0045902953,0.019348018,0.017434169,0.000005931866,0.00001211834,0.00007208312,0.0125330575],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950477,0.00027222306,0.0011329387,0.00041061357,0.002304945,0.00083157344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924387,0.00035615548,0.0010790997,0.0003996698,0.0048465044,0.0008798737],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010854958,0.00033948114,0.0005409345,0.0014485139,0.0011368552,0.3054498,0.0027704423,0.00032990356,0.00060836144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024578607,0.00028935325,0.00033568498,0.0005132698,0.000120632976,0.30809435,0.00038085162,0.00637582,0.000033067903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007397855,0.00018357452,0.002401647,0.00004173386,0.00012380217,0.00004435403,0.038183674,0.00012822304,0.0005127642,0.08459937,0.82329214,0.050414726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079473393,0.00014197642,0.00039116608,0.00019975411,0.000050940034,0.00011793408,0.022093398,0.000043829947,0.00012222356,0.00058252434,0.9751104,0.00035108958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011579807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019395509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42967626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033857007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035897346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236915175","doi":"10.3138/jsp.40.3.231","title":"Should Graduate Students Publish?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Writing and Publishing","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Context (archaeology); Process (computing); Wish; Graduate students; Field (mathematics); Publishing; Psychology; Computer science; Mathematics education; Sociology; Pedagogy; Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.17058094809257957,"score_gpt":0.31784448703196094,"score_spread":0.14726353893938138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236915175","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65637743,0.0019712735,0.00016915506,0.106052816,0.004289645,0.00015408474,0.00002029615,0.00018841094,0.23077688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97707295,0.00006540862,0.0005360077,0.009278307,0.008756134,0.0000010299004,0.000008811458,0.000029781866,0.004251595],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99499035,0.00019763983,0.0011833019,0.00025592966,0.0028125711,0.0005602276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99463946,0.0002198006,0.0011024224,0.00026734045,0.003343638,0.00042732968],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009098479,0.00025440188,0.0004471977,0.0008117684,0.0006342093,0.17059886,0.0026463636,0.00025350632,0.00036834672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007660996,0.00020643363,0.00028142624,0.00025138492,0.000095707546,0.21690653,0.00015859507,0.0051569724,0.000021497268],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006535613,0.0002614269,0.00826674,0.000020696438,0.000120203404,0.00011115378,0.02574577,0.000014771094,0.00020340577,0.13060072,0.7912053,0.043384496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014501183,0.0003777216,0.015162058,0.00038026055,0.000097997094,0.0001763832,0.014637901,0.000018716364,0.000054552547,0.033415753,0.93377614,0.00045241092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000096167285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016973674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3206955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015281768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019452463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99713814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236943233","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0060","title":"Motivations for Web-Based Scholarly Publishing: Do Scientists Recognize Open Availability as an Advantage?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Perception; Control (management); Scholarly communication; Public relations; Open data; Psychology; Sociology; World Wide Web; Internet privacy; Social psychology; Business; Advertising; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Management; Law","score_opus":0.48923711479207593,"score_gpt":0.5404845672119195,"score_spread":0.051247452419843575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236943233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9031478,0.0008432237,0.011257841,0.05635061,0.0027467313,0.0012268085,0.00021950314,0.00006039547,0.024147091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9410326,0.00004407036,0.053104833,0.0033855084,0.00066492177,0.00001397742,0.000028940018,0.000035115085,0.0016900473],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9697313,0.0014735789,0.0034139366,0.0016570351,0.022308877,0.0014153286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8700938,0.011779959,0.004140586,0.0026766113,0.107819885,0.0034891136],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.24006544,0.00038823235,0.00092715997,0.06397784,0.0018143994,0.7975296,0.022871837,0.00061908783,0.0008636441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.731846,0.0002925379,0.0005819236,0.13397464,0.00022777758,0.6333806,0.0014946999,0.0042716553,0.00007658113],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000507036,0.0017334599,0.33707026,0.0000143736,0.00005683543,0.000054849035,0.00036570887,0.0000817928,0.008262666,0.0077905273,0.20937258,0.4346899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0066955914,0.0022925637,0.51166034,0.00014893725,0.00004520527,0.00013505995,0.002146121,0.0022565026,0.0010627592,0.17529158,0.29759875,0.00066659687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000104976316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030312673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49178052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086017884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047434024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236994059","doi":"10.3138/jsp.37.4.317","title":"Index Volume 37 (2005-6)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Volume (thermodynamics); Mathematics; Statistics; Computer science; Thermodynamics; Physics","score_opus":0.030637662817866406,"score_gpt":0.19406568249639622,"score_spread":0.16342801967852982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236994059","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15179789,0.008637848,0.00245804,0.0073693353,0.0084015755,0.0000925729,0.00013589021,0.000034422883,0.8210724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8075469,0.00013405626,0.0015428853,0.0005862777,0.0013888024,0.0000014474663,0.0000037617451,0.000022026808,0.18877386],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981902,0.000013592493,0.0010698972,0.00024379359,0.00012066854,0.00036181227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814236,0.000037013535,0.0011748325,0.00020626592,0.00030788998,0.00013165062],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039174166,0.00012232816,0.0004092865,0.00050755363,0.00019208777,0.014451058,0.0006859953,0.00013126808,0.0033309716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009797656,0.00012969052,0.00020457503,0.00027684643,0.000065145294,0.043354306,0.00014070419,0.000691443,0.0018838476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000970065,0.000051965068,0.20384392,0.0000051221045,0.000056646095,0.000013282449,0.00012444604,0.00017455468,0.000008201851,0.047373883,0.74787813,0.00046014113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063591084,0.000023460438,0.081633866,0.000016403925,0.0000067660667,0.0000256734,0.00038831035,0.00021652169,0.000006304459,0.022820093,0.89406854,0.00015813747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029429205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016059752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65574896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002387234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052429263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237237646","doi":"10.3138/jsp.43.1.68","title":"Journal des Savants","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Digitization; Realm; Newspaper; Cloud computing; Service (business); World Wide Web; Scarcity; Collection development; Computer science; Digital library; Library science; Media studies; Sociology; Political science; Telecommunications; Business; Law; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.37459081122115817,"score_gpt":0.29333469746472796,"score_spread":0.08125611375643021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237237646","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.628262,0.0045396145,0.12630452,0.003244041,0.0036945953,0.0000763791,0.0000016291261,0.00007934586,0.23379791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92744905,0.00011213247,0.07014372,0.0011269568,0.0005510256,1.4655636e-7,1.3829705e-7,0.000009668375,0.00060718274],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980064,0.00008194891,0.0006115137,0.00012295846,0.0008346632,0.0003425043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960021,0.00005656573,0.00070940255,0.00021402522,0.0024052134,0.00061273156],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002078847,0.00013190975,0.00021159413,0.00035674617,0.0003022198,0.10161944,0.0020818443,0.00010184963,0.00004940416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028261656,0.00008166027,0.00018187586,0.0004800564,0.000054612592,0.41192678,0.00028119524,0.0013568192,0.000015696902],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014118607,0.00080386456,0.029819842,0.00003797278,0.00042481074,0.0051569473,0.043318283,0.000027128479,0.0129604,0.16606994,0.13413951,0.6071001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002631389,0.0016765556,0.2676349,0.00067973684,0.000057893536,0.041800078,0.0015387805,0.0001743345,0.008007309,0.57517266,0.0998279,0.00079843967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003678393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000061033925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60630167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011220906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022688284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89931315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237766004","doi":"10.3138/jsp.40.1.66","title":"The Scholarly Book Buyer's Decision Process: A National Survey of University Faculty Members in the United States","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Library science; Public relations; Sociology; Survey research; Marketing; Political science; Business; Publishing; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.062251887586472564,"score_gpt":0.2632937311605061,"score_spread":0.2010418435740335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237766004","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9842881,0.00045475486,0.0032655331,0.00653837,0.0001840031,0.00011235374,0.000010552663,0.000019866644,0.005126493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952413,0.0002651001,0.002374143,0.0012542317,0.000043849708,6.217323e-7,0.000014174155,0.0000065245117,0.0008000985],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965411,0.0005032947,0.00052743783,0.0001564688,0.0020711327,0.0002006025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936828,0.0020085871,0.0006013476,0.0001652863,0.0034350695,0.000106886255],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074204523,0.00010902514,0.00015631191,0.00079124345,0.0006327731,0.018615706,0.002923814,0.00008826891,0.000006352246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009680784,0.00006478827,0.00007541786,0.0037879487,0.000081226935,0.1502764,0.00023609377,0.0010398271,0.0000013709802],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009752062,0.00045558417,0.66581744,0.000022429196,0.0002333535,0.0002368961,0.025024764,0.0068978583,0.00003141843,0.008040486,0.28366134,0.008603246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012351613,0.00013010133,0.80008227,0.00008956771,0.000004026517,0.00015950656,0.002083459,0.0022023877,0.000061709085,0.004412529,0.18937771,0.00016157284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021609625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007304584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13426483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014165523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010869525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237895129","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44.2.002","title":"The <i>Wisconsin Magazine of History</i>: A Case Study in Scholarly and Popular Approaches to American State Historical Society Publishing, 1917–2000","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"American History and Culture","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Professionalization; State (computer science); Publishing; Elite; Appeal; Comparative historical research; Sociology; Business history; History; Law; Media studies; Social science; Political science; Economic history; Politics","score_opus":0.08065630041004948,"score_gpt":0.2323745514262324,"score_spread":0.15171825101618291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237895129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9817256,0.0075217886,0.00018875951,0.0075591807,0.0009107341,0.00034877952,0.0000027568176,0.000030372918,0.0017120291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930094,0.000040064864,0.0019780328,0.0027246336,0.0012810295,0.00001253382,0.0000022554768,0.00004846008,0.00090359926],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99644214,0.00020167748,0.0011794851,0.00033457507,0.0012196079,0.0006224972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99633086,0.00013249464,0.001927883,0.0003915381,0.0010251701,0.00019204657],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008946208,0.00032079828,0.0006697508,0.0005932814,0.00045180973,0.018659009,0.00096942164,0.00012991947,0.00001778019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003907041,0.00023850426,0.00022963341,0.0014688554,0.00021672058,0.17691043,0.00044545822,0.0027653927,0.0000044994567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031294036,0.0012432182,0.71299255,0.00010417228,0.00025550328,0.0005330159,0.032552127,0.000042407315,0.00060912286,0.0017073253,0.21758443,0.032063216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001311171,0.0001850539,0.059060432,0.00007750539,0.00017132846,0.00058506127,0.045217823,0.000030550214,0.00000206016,0.00015740657,0.89278686,0.00041473343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052576605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009926502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6752024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018250316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026222816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953526},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4237930872","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.1.033","title":"Authority 3.0: Friend or Foe to Scholars?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Translation Studies and Practices","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10852710302091008,"score_gpt":0.3237367288057868,"score_spread":0.21520962578487673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237930872","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41202775,0.004610695,0.006431752,0.071686685,0.010552594,0.00030723616,0.000038044884,0.00011430521,0.49423096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820984,0.00007688314,0.0064543067,0.0029784942,0.0046837702,0.0000010457791,0.0000015149158,0.000025114863,0.0036804883],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977458,0.00008835309,0.0007587409,0.00015199122,0.0009238159,0.00033129653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966456,0.00051038177,0.0005558852,0.00015414962,0.0018042098,0.0003297575],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0078095803,0.00013912292,0.00026325876,0.00046063875,0.0007574454,0.04050545,0.00054136646,0.00009442682,0.0012305169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002541915,0.00009854756,0.00013446297,0.00021413423,0.00005145459,0.105114155,0.00008050405,0.0016931206,0.000043924978],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017938614,0.00035000974,0.012756508,0.000072554,0.0005448259,0.00039778775,0.11185027,0.000020191343,0.0005224388,0.21961378,0.17728622,0.47479156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048144354,0.00022193282,0.005276871,0.000062622305,0.000044163437,0.0000463539,0.014391623,9.673116e-7,0.00003836566,0.0012856555,0.978011,0.00013900106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013484868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012098685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8007248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007061381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011004971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238294467","doi":"10.3138/jsp.43.1.90","title":"Appraising Internationality in Spanish Communication Journals","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Advertising and Communication Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sample (material); Spanish language; Foreign language; International communication; Scientific communication; English language; Political science; Library science; Sociology; Linguistics; Computer science; Pedagogy; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.23267793061543812,"score_gpt":0.389557138168525,"score_spread":0.15687920755308687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238294467","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62602276,0.009768604,0.0042471243,0.035549697,0.0007099727,0.00011618384,0.0000018187179,0.0000442624,0.32353958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884405,0.0013976339,0.009392846,0.00042064092,0.0001679437,0.0000012249426,5.574734e-7,0.0000068768213,0.00017174256],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972074,0.00091352186,0.0007320846,0.00008154452,0.0008788156,0.00018665765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963047,0.00036888453,0.0008982021,0.00024876266,0.0020601153,0.000119358854],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012828089,0.00007055644,0.00019095022,0.0003768166,0.00058263127,0.006867271,0.0015214185,0.00011466693,0.0001044739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010573717,0.00006789067,0.00008817151,0.0005373615,0.00015386737,0.049509287,0.00020475443,0.00140886,0.000003938246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006967814,0.0003573902,0.63928103,0.0000074954664,0.0001177878,0.000018322486,0.17474318,0.000015865842,0.00016050137,0.10745083,0.0050499956,0.07272794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008525463,0.000039483468,0.75114703,0.0006682466,0.000027934126,0.00003566681,0.067634575,0.0000148344225,0.00006504514,0.09068223,0.08861818,0.00021425135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020912155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001176428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36241776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026592205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002464805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99776065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238486033","doi":"10.3138/jsp.36.2.49","title":"The Return of the Armchair Scholar","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Historical Economic and Social Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Amateur; Scholarship; Professionalization; Digitization; Sociology; The Internet; Media studies; Social science; Political science; Public relations; Engineering; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.0365770373804531,"score_gpt":0.21280597431229803,"score_spread":0.17622893693184494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238486033","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69851154,0.05294876,0.0006272465,0.121549554,0.004126571,0.00017944029,0.000033665805,0.00001637419,0.122006856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948258,0.0007420268,0.00055304123,0.0008892406,0.0009845281,0.0000013578763,1.4903745e-7,0.0000129890805,0.0019908915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832666,0.000054103864,0.0011442937,0.00012139976,0.00013444464,0.00021910516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99744034,0.00018966055,0.00166025,0.0002452244,0.00037401303,0.000090508045],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056959465,0.000094138275,0.00034857955,0.00010450211,0.00079059496,0.0035982467,0.001161504,0.00013128863,0.00004547669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007294221,0.00006161567,0.00031747,0.00029703474,0.0001155226,0.016321152,0.00016108513,0.0016149485,0.000023741699],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061368475,0.00017015167,0.1804449,0.000020764923,0.0004927161,0.0000032074397,0.007602026,0.00015924411,0.000110231886,0.6368653,0.13385959,0.040210504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033705143,0.000029375498,0.03103813,0.00001929643,0.000007649381,0.0000062651734,0.00060922204,0.00003823976,0.000029388912,0.023376815,0.9444261,0.000082452345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008566196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000038795595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81056654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043671142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007344233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99743706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238541671","doi":"10.3138/jsp.43.3.294","title":"Lester J. Cappon, Scholarly Publishing, and the <i>Atlas of Early American History</i>, 1957–1976","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"American History and Culture","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Archivist; Atlas (anatomy); Variety (cybernetics); Endowment; History; Product (mathematics); Political science; Library science; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.02344702037620592,"score_gpt":0.20846915258380894,"score_spread":0.18502213220760302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238541671","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9161645,0.013146001,0.00025646389,0.015924675,0.0023007547,0.0002469785,0.00000502141,0.00006115262,0.051894438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98334974,0.00006837015,0.0006921584,0.010041461,0.0044956314,0.0000061517076,0.0000056657727,0.000054426702,0.0012864054],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963449,0.00019604564,0.00106985,0.00027321352,0.0015266853,0.0005892529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99280065,0.00021097722,0.0034607812,0.00043571412,0.0029381742,0.0001536853],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007921326,0.00033488777,0.0007359088,0.00068385,0.00040340447,0.040065426,0.0016735599,0.0002178343,0.00017043597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069368933,0.00022746748,0.00032307435,0.0009780937,0.00083172356,0.40628418,0.00044342893,0.0033370098,0.000021463413],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008574839,0.00030278054,0.31922808,0.00017557241,0.00036745827,0.000029697332,0.008182916,0.000008143925,0.002067181,0.054476667,0.5950935,0.019210523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019294566,0.00005676088,0.07663389,0.00013368613,0.0002582674,0.00007815879,0.0044173105,0.000009315354,0.000014691578,0.0006442501,0.9155027,0.0003214848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023036334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000045250636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36621878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028926827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018723548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99896234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238582272","doi":"10.1353/scp.2008.0007","title":"Assessing the Demand for Scholarly Publishing in South Africa","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Exploratory research; Sample (material); Mythology; Sociology; Marketing; Economics; Social science; Media studies; Political science; Business; History; Law","score_opus":0.13811937241981662,"score_gpt":0.28774553318244506,"score_spread":0.14962616076262844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238582272","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8710329,0.009407959,0.0021149728,0.044778537,0.0027076507,0.00052792893,0.000038517093,0.00012351171,0.06926803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912098,0.00007193179,0.0032216427,0.0014761015,0.0025247224,0.000023526953,0.000019481451,0.000062021005,0.0013907624],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945065,0.00087901513,0.0016870397,0.00036636612,0.001820689,0.00074039854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98907423,0.0016160366,0.0018173081,0.0007947328,0.006382864,0.00031483217],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.022237763,0.00032709105,0.00056485605,0.0013118912,0.0027281535,0.48987505,0.004230981,0.00035998636,0.000075513584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043017514,0.00023505856,0.0003887503,0.0006103658,0.00029109296,0.6474306,0.00041281566,0.0070178513,0.0000063685984],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025013677,0.00068223046,0.07851327,0.00012253555,0.0004291508,0.00014508255,0.5852652,0.00032519083,0.00081892096,0.15176126,0.16088352,0.02080345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040094145,0.00028429864,0.052308634,0.00068620284,0.00013557142,0.00026778382,0.07417568,0.0005337587,0.000051412026,0.023039607,0.84376365,0.000743967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017248615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015040602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68288016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038496027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081610476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99857014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238755784","doi":"10.3138/jsp.38.4.183","title":"The Post-petroleum Future of Academic Libraries","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Big Data Technologies and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vision; Abandonment (legal); Petroleum; Economics; Industrial organization; Business; Political science; Natural resource economics; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.11420193585016919,"score_gpt":0.34909092409906506,"score_spread":0.23488898824889587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238755784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69329774,0.014477602,0.009073776,0.27585432,0.0016205686,0.000108668595,0.000047859136,0.000048341015,0.0054711383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904116,0.00053604983,0.0066539044,0.0010381563,0.00096953486,8.87124e-7,0.000001949686,0.000010028043,0.00037793754],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99574536,0.00008327365,0.0014547644,0.00017346333,0.0022523014,0.0002908209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99232066,0.0022993423,0.001845723,0.0006773789,0.0027042762,0.00015264358],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01967688,0.000099196586,0.0002405839,0.0005139983,0.00044584117,0.01860869,0.0055039166,0.0003425611,0.000029434252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028870067,0.000051633207,0.00016492553,0.0013977381,0.00021731044,0.0637701,0.0005706597,0.0029382634,0.000010115045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008384001,0.000029187779,0.028108431,0.0000022810898,0.000034039916,0.000008240457,0.00030336968,0.000007403859,0.0051358817,0.20342514,0.1798312,0.583031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020667718,0.000079231475,0.08139428,0.000022299302,0.00001043989,0.00007270518,0.013143299,0.000009555233,0.0016849246,0.10123516,0.80207163,0.00006982591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009174726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014650353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62224036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036765818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022009085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238874764","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.1.001","title":"The Changing College and University Library Market for University Press Books and Journals: 1997–2004","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Media studies; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.02069434747242022,"score_gpt":0.2419599895828115,"score_spread":0.2212656421103913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238874764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58257276,0.0069639646,0.004212374,0.16264872,0.0019210076,0.00074142974,0.00016788318,0.00009275916,0.2406791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84905756,0.007132773,0.014180717,0.0064230007,0.0027572366,2.45402e-7,0.000005123338,0.000029053248,0.12041428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874854,0.00015599666,0.0002449693,0.000081951606,0.0004648004,0.00030371678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981809,0.0006440162,0.0004397214,0.00006552661,0.00035854933,0.00031126366],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077909767,0.00006398101,0.000106537744,0.00034852105,0.0023208493,0.013138041,0.00062818156,0.00009349871,0.000018048288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010325746,0.000050717455,0.000057613586,0.00047701265,0.00018986252,0.30561662,0.00015311709,0.00047760023,1.2823288e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008211407,0.000042216314,0.035163336,0.00004435779,0.00011221908,0.00011684786,0.056067258,0.000004460029,0.000037657737,0.43127748,0.41106355,0.06524945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045534616,0.00003628742,0.007967686,0.000053364776,0.000010487838,0.000019220888,0.07442192,0.00004711614,0.000012943431,0.0008667114,0.9160445,0.000064432264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002772471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000905815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5049809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006696476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000301633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238935763","doi":"10.3138/jsp.41.3.375","title":"Making International Journals Truly International","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Promotion (chess); Political science; Public relations; Library science; Regional science; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.6847718273091886,"score_gpt":0.6094118758696567,"score_spread":0.07535995143953189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238935763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7762961,0.00065690686,0.011698289,0.07954931,0.032028705,0.00009331606,0.000032790518,0.000020351767,0.09962427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782852,0.00013017292,0.015670724,0.0010112231,0.003331182,8.290042e-7,0.0000014253874,0.000015421832,0.0015538448],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9730369,0.00022665733,0.0020432689,0.00040281095,0.023804616,0.00048578563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95498395,0.0032359492,0.0024844245,0.0005477951,0.038029272,0.0007186336],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09646759,0.00015541071,0.00034883848,0.06956657,0.00030069266,0.28181142,0.0121103255,0.00028863986,0.0046653673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.39457837,0.000107917396,0.00039768388,0.040745843,0.000102116275,0.14019759,0.0012795631,0.004879846,0.000106879095],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063729305,0.00015818508,0.4488392,0.0000010751438,0.00010744236,0.00016278848,0.00024514852,0.0000407197,0.01904996,0.0043283277,0.1048709,0.42213252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009954947,0.00007969975,0.28476486,0.00004291955,0.000008799839,0.0010524464,0.0007552838,0.0011804498,0.00045383372,0.032163773,0.6783198,0.000182613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012030536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001110586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5734489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020357218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053774915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99741596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239037867","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.1.fm","title":"Front Matter","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Front (military); Geography; Meteorology","score_opus":0.042705896592540406,"score_gpt":0.29801228205373126,"score_spread":0.25530638546119083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239037867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034601563,0.018408392,0.00026024005,0.008689403,0.023983298,0.00026216026,0.000589092,0.00003132388,0.9443159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008524548,0.00046174796,0.005079379,0.0027440346,0.02255625,0.000008193013,0.00019551713,0.0007865362,0.9596438],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912319,0.000606773,0.00235798,0.0006075792,0.0041687894,0.0010269475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9783273,0.00022069157,0.011230252,0.0017431898,0.007561193,0.0009173986],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011252822,0.0008161104,0.0018291512,0.0025420717,0.00075364957,0.31312564,0.008442407,0.001987354,0.058930527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0098088,0.00069360674,0.0010628399,0.00022509204,0.0001699746,0.3212627,0.0009489371,0.018625736,0.368261],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001244301,0.00009308258,0.0017635598,0.000109587934,0.00060727115,0.0002888744,0.00027775558,0.000030327874,0.0010015079,0.00001161748,0.99412537,0.0015666134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013199026,0.000105833984,0.00492979,0.0022050939,0.00029272906,0.0010410399,0.000120413206,0.000002937928,0.00011759382,0.00027244637,0.9888996,0.000692645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022685151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019591635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3093305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014751918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020448952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239106413","doi":"10.3138/jsp.41.2.241","title":"Marginalia","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Marginalia; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03199387607341216,"score_gpt":0.27439905795460084,"score_spread":0.24240518188118867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239106413","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88931817,0.0026025733,0.0008417589,0.04266792,0.0012982647,0.00010804754,0.000010582204,0.00012132669,0.06303132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837036,0.000017322634,0.0117744645,0.002355073,0.0014699941,2.564584e-7,0.0000020957202,0.000040973333,0.0006361901],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963798,0.00021177642,0.0008829739,0.00017157805,0.0019080414,0.0004458636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99496317,0.0000905393,0.0011672672,0.00030556973,0.0029983476,0.00047508872],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008147549,0.00018080388,0.000349245,0.00097518833,0.00017168821,0.057046954,0.0014726472,0.0001957864,0.00024296812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009592792,0.00015398843,0.00024539293,0.0010622195,0.000030542873,0.2532169,0.00006295706,0.0031650052,0.00031621073],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003576641,0.00039530214,0.035068635,0.000011240603,0.00014965676,0.0008447393,0.00095744804,0.00010472984,0.10818499,0.018134791,0.78334385,0.05244697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031508491,0.00080202165,0.48455316,0.00034947885,0.00013314394,0.0026308896,0.0007519806,0.000054909124,0.002096945,0.03398049,0.47099873,0.0004974042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011302293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001961061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44948453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036501957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027094968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239134503","doi":"10.3138/jsp.40.4.408","title":"Writing a Series of Best-Selling Research Reference Books","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"African Education and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Library science; Mathematics education; Series (stratigraphy); Computer science; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.2338386554932815,"score_gpt":0.4376869365998974,"score_spread":0.20384828110661588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239134503","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62464815,0.0010735558,0.00012535439,0.04558685,0.00037125632,0.000079163416,0.0000033733568,0.000016008833,0.32809627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904165,0.00025628437,0.0046320744,0.00046197706,0.0010956454,3.991306e-7,4.9792453e-7,0.0000059720755,0.0031306376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99678564,0.0005624753,0.00060106197,0.000099780205,0.0015517381,0.00039930653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99383646,0.00047070163,0.0004986467,0.00013229992,0.0047558043,0.00030605818],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013089723,0.000065167485,0.0001853901,0.00047414692,0.00066441944,0.009165243,0.0008154118,0.00015052635,0.00008009875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01260809,0.00006201037,0.000067615794,0.00068071776,0.00021739797,0.037340593,0.000035319383,0.001852343,0.0000049261657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039007722,0.00017633729,0.01282624,0.000021545462,0.000024131796,0.000017138753,0.07743186,0.000011142187,0.002090471,0.8675699,0.012809005,0.026983192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041107432,0.0005653239,0.009830345,0.00064411806,0.000029486757,0.000044868364,0.3609454,0.0000061550772,0.00088431843,0.111552626,0.5148513,0.0002350084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004793474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006338213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7560173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019712391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014578908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957091},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4239199063","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44.1.75","title":"British Scholarly Journals on Film Studies: Study and Evaluation of Their Internationality","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Library science; Quality (philosophy); Process (computing); Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Business; Epistemology","score_opus":0.80514527235736,"score_gpt":0.6173760173108069,"score_spread":0.18776925504655306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239199063","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96944046,0.024814801,0.00019573314,0.0022542467,0.0014349621,0.00025815537,0.000018378752,0.0000044125077,0.0015788799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980055,0.0007321485,0.0004376861,0.00021923389,0.00046712678,0.0000033685812,5.735754e-7,0.0000107349115,0.0001235951],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96194685,0.0025497728,0.0024019897,0.00039587563,0.03219545,0.00051004434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9131318,0.007336882,0.0027258,0.0005080059,0.075553134,0.0007444159],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.355226,0.00015614853,0.00059455127,0.030235082,0.0002985372,0.109922774,0.0028698924,0.00015361236,0.0005302907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4738052,0.00010984246,0.00021149285,0.03836982,0.00011657833,0.16189119,0.00083941297,0.00208535,0.0000072201897],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003606735,0.00067459635,0.7336629,0.0000042687398,0.00019812818,0.0000067149326,0.0019602296,0.00004112444,0.0002966796,0.0001252843,0.010661916,0.25233206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016354255,0.00052646425,0.9649578,0.00013951202,0.00004970013,0.00013674717,0.019070873,0.00034256163,0.00016026811,0.01022969,0.0026299201,0.00012103561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008561598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002302556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25221103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043431923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041524763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9820701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239243730","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.4.417","title":"Peer-Review Practice and Research for Academic Journals in China","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Publishing; Peer review; Internationalization; Function (biology); Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.8279242085320313,"score_gpt":0.6662651312879123,"score_spread":0.161659077244119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239243730","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2699977,0.1962802,0.0017188931,0.52436215,0.0007604956,0.00049497135,0.000015372108,0.000005700366,0.0063645327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79511714,0.17105702,0.020031953,0.004182219,0.0013785835,0.000015637059,0.000001803535,0.00003797749,0.0081776455],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93852496,0.0025671704,0.0032985369,0.00067155884,0.053747125,0.0011906603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7391637,0.055198006,0.003516924,0.0009978546,0.19895501,0.0021685248],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.52565306,0.00014143737,0.0006261439,0.07942668,0.0006744935,0.06170676,0.004984965,0.00032127413,0.00011003857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.91775274,0.000094515955,0.00020577176,0.13212532,0.00019543666,0.14717522,0.00094116887,0.007937505,0.000015508258],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009224216,0.0001256871,0.0781688,0.000042058495,0.000022074819,0.0002451479,0.0007390864,0.0000072099515,0.0004197471,0.0005883337,0.75155413,0.16799548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011091044,0.00035033637,0.20734921,0.0005675555,0.000010340367,0.0028863966,0.0011337817,0.0001572004,0.000054384567,0.017463572,0.7687802,0.00013796805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000726848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000037335158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5251195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003167992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012653302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239373160","doi":"10.3138/jsp.43.2.168","title":"Art History Publishing and Segmentation: Exploratory Observations of an Ecology of Publishing","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Art History and Market Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Context (archaeology); Variety (cybernetics); Sine qua non; Sociology; History; Computer science; Art; Literature; Archaeology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1358543205013794,"score_gpt":0.2286249847710238,"score_spread":0.09277066426964439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239373160","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90245265,0.0021401595,0.0002282235,0.0019730728,0.0022864575,0.00010520828,0.00003108137,0.000038960457,0.0907442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858382,0.00009130814,0.00803602,0.0011114291,0.000978675,0.0000066700572,0.000040898463,0.000038174647,0.0038586748],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99708134,0.00039259877,0.0013179709,0.00022328382,0.0007435869,0.00024119431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99346447,0.00024256029,0.0022000999,0.00029147038,0.0035451239,0.000256283],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056970264,0.00017950176,0.0005231011,0.0011060361,0.0003241989,0.0073956307,0.0008547935,0.00019366475,0.0016090882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039420417,0.00017072247,0.00019693798,0.00017841825,0.0003733531,0.30405056,0.00016572242,0.0012187634,0.0000014991339],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041151606,0.0010079613,0.05440722,0.00033234406,0.0010137307,0.00007714256,0.40612715,0.00002256764,0.00547865,0.2016522,0.3085393,0.020930214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021795349,0.0010622741,0.035022344,0.0002993262,0.00070115447,0.00006774717,0.10741618,0.00012417139,0.00038967107,0.007890506,0.844272,0.00057506055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026301958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013050222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53573275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029562414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045618473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239394609","doi":"10.3138/jsp.37.2.99","title":"Discouraging Verification: Citation Practices across the Disciplines","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Writing and Publishing","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Citation; Computer science; Test (biology); Data science; Sociology; Information retrieval; Epistemology; World Wide Web; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0719086328816541,"score_gpt":0.3087760214049235,"score_spread":0.23686738852326938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239394609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7960222,0.0025269946,0.0005628508,0.15428886,0.002154709,0.00009642788,0.00001986567,0.00005843003,0.044269677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98451215,0.000025982854,0.00038986185,0.0006217637,0.012220438,0.0000032697337,0.000014462968,0.000019914662,0.0021921727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777997,0.00019100268,0.00076658156,0.00015555476,0.00081711356,0.00028977878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946791,0.0006682903,0.0025977849,0.00018887992,0.0017943317,0.00007159164],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073964857,0.0001322548,0.0001735307,0.00015610283,0.0014719052,0.102651745,0.001009236,0.00009645044,0.00008356521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070169517,0.00008230647,0.0001240891,0.00018099553,0.00016324583,0.14427045,0.00010228946,0.00204024,0.000006828958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008170317,0.00016245784,0.036456723,0.000078428406,0.00012586247,0.00002334834,0.13106444,0.00048270373,0.0018027368,0.5137779,0.29495278,0.020990886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047638724,0.00003866558,0.01750954,0.00019932346,0.00006458628,0.00010553443,0.12103269,0.00016753409,0.000063380074,0.020200258,0.8399232,0.00021888228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005386541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002453621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54497045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000074236596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000110627596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239660586","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44.1.91","title":"Book Reviews","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obsolescence; Publishing; Sociology; Political science; Law; Business; Marketing","score_opus":0.09126870488231585,"score_gpt":0.27234664814318615,"score_spread":0.1810779432608703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239660586","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030862035,0.50764924,0.00031118334,0.04120661,0.0071085542,0.00024207719,0.000010611699,0.00010405802,0.41250566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9062196,0.0061361967,0.004051035,0.03018992,0.0178937,0.00001184072,0.000022970395,0.00007939986,0.035395365],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741215,0.0004492873,0.00094196317,0.00009130851,0.00073161256,0.0003736575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963948,0.00018499617,0.0010978056,0.00043095287,0.0015448572,0.00034658727],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011722592,0.00014957493,0.00033723548,0.00043783037,0.0005052217,0.07563961,0.0014770863,0.000116394585,0.0016376416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007836714,0.00011365596,0.00023814532,0.00012495594,0.00007684765,0.41086614,0.0001644956,0.0025376144,0.00010600022],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011339361,0.00010948778,0.0027894613,0.00001546074,0.000036370846,0.0000016554743,0.015971767,4.1899926e-7,0.0001237002,0.05908431,0.9081128,0.013743188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026855705,0.000047706846,0.0014523363,0.00013042122,0.000038900063,0.000048896,0.001352606,0.000002071345,0.000022002183,0.00075975934,0.995741,0.00013574597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004522649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011018757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8753575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014011815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000945474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239881691","doi":"10.3138/jsp.33.3.148","title":"Translation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Translation Studies and Practices","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chatterjee; Citation; Sociology; Political science; Library science; Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1610113859521445,"score_gpt":0.2635530330380113,"score_spread":0.1025416470858668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239881691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019138025,0.019695846,0.00050821993,0.058896422,0.0020093268,0.00006123647,0.0000088073175,0.00003490377,0.89964724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940888,0.00053257024,0.0010663829,0.0008761824,0.0020398903,5.136475e-7,7.855735e-7,0.000010163282,0.0013846878],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989339,0.00006019662,0.00038416334,0.00006001969,0.00045232,0.00010939874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986846,0.00017894617,0.00036951163,0.00006286862,0.00064050197,0.00006360583],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010072469,0.00006506557,0.0001257015,0.00017634728,0.00029716556,0.0221296,0.00020665974,0.000040787225,0.002930086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019314451,0.000050425646,0.00009922686,0.00006000431,0.00003704958,0.101953775,0.0000079499605,0.0006629539,0.000030877676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034989876,0.00009862129,0.001219211,0.000019053634,0.00015083353,0.000018230945,0.056621943,0.000021571566,0.00010601913,0.0496775,0.080771506,0.8112605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039024462,0.00005800589,0.00023312989,0.000022893617,0.000032196578,0.000017847511,0.0024682323,0.000055667697,0.0000056134286,0.0011158562,0.9955375,0.0000627825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024908972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000060099625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9749508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015016027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009393901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99798137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239970099","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44.1.61","title":"Editing Academic Books in the Humanities and Social Sciences: Maximizing Impact for Effort","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Argument (complex analysis); Promotion (chess); Quality (philosophy); Hegemony; Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Digital humanities; Public relations; Political science; Library science; Social science; Computer science; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.7397174462705441,"score_gpt":0.5726202859908598,"score_spread":0.16709716027968435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239970099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98414063,0.004373451,0.0012158346,0.0061941138,0.00067504257,0.00016878065,0.000010540077,0.0000045936804,0.0032170024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950859,0.000057780773,0.0016542295,0.0012587961,0.001856829,0.0000034738312,4.3492398e-7,0.000007798183,0.00007474462],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889376,0.0003226789,0.0010943175,0.0002307876,0.008581516,0.00083310955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98805934,0.0072194533,0.0011186053,0.00014224091,0.0033088753,0.00015149248],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19473776,0.00012427499,0.00031246076,0.030271608,0.0013794876,0.12705326,0.0036175349,0.00018834474,0.00002451642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0945478,0.00006624651,0.00020460365,0.029605202,0.0003009613,0.10178787,0.00045716987,0.002191873,0.0000020322025],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003067013,0.000048995593,0.89017755,0.000010083864,0.000016929336,0.0000049256737,0.0070512705,0.000011444059,0.0005374215,0.0065654903,0.040308416,0.055236794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011421485,0.00037192833,0.8520878,0.000076195814,0.0000187212,0.00027057467,0.030959884,0.0005144723,0.00010682985,0.023537464,0.090694286,0.00021970997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004955195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005375439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10018996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019034697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032036824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240327873","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44.2.001","title":"Stakeholders, Service, and the Future of University Press Publishing","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Stakeholder; Order (exchange); Service (business); Value (mathematics); Public relations; Revenue; Sociology; Business; Entrepreneurship; Stakeholder theory; Management; Marketing; Knowledge management; Political science; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.49361089594369123,"score_gpt":0.43763194929906707,"score_spread":0.05597894664462416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240327873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8862443,0.02396759,0.0016830286,0.06799598,0.002429228,0.000201525,0.000041531734,0.000010261873,0.017426575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951451,0.0009069148,0.0017770774,0.0006104357,0.0009043894,1.706815e-7,8.270875e-7,0.000008664475,0.0006464155],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98593205,0.001240772,0.0009735744,0.00024603837,0.011064327,0.000543207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96733874,0.008315416,0.0020670218,0.0006641029,0.020695373,0.00091933314],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14140385,0.00012461263,0.00042250258,0.018589593,0.00037970397,0.11185156,0.0052905153,0.00023755188,0.00006294014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10262732,0.00006862278,0.00019133349,0.061387155,0.00018683952,0.23768076,0.0013984307,0.0021981557,0.0000020169985],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006306683,0.00024683072,0.50184697,0.00003618073,0.00016839695,0.000024608022,0.0040769614,0.000038899638,0.00037351495,0.064438656,0.23015364,0.19796465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003091909,0.0000712063,0.27106383,0.000038568796,0.00004061536,0.00012609195,0.022101784,0.00028000952,0.000107318316,0.003100148,0.6998289,0.00014961073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023405302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014215664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46967527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011285224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002831332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99253386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240373498","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.2.156","title":"Editors and Copy Editors in Fiction: Taking a Carpet-Sweeper to the Jungle","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Digital Games and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jungle; Power (physics); Sociology; Art history; History; Art; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03189043134728093,"score_gpt":0.2825806362067132,"score_spread":0.2506902048594323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240373498","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8262034,0.0007542307,0.00007560693,0.043504775,0.03267684,0.00016852816,0.0000031966988,0.00002219762,0.09659126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94516575,0.00013453697,0.00040353602,0.00094434124,0.05130862,0.0000018825851,4.2351888e-7,0.000010939511,0.0020299647],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792963,0.00013109292,0.00036884766,0.00012838766,0.0011436632,0.0002983661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841666,0.00023112791,0.00030455194,0.0000977588,0.0006162995,0.00033362737],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034372334,0.00008714487,0.00017430536,0.00026253963,0.00033422557,0.009014347,0.0005226599,0.0001374549,0.000027336775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008675722,0.00006245653,0.00007256059,0.0006601569,0.00011271255,0.03501277,0.00009077289,0.0010172031,0.0000035864043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029275998,0.000065909306,0.09278649,0.0000060016273,0.000028026237,0.00011376117,0.077981696,0.00006925107,0.00007647302,0.000649681,0.78214544,0.046047963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023775022,0.000060404254,0.04149862,0.000078599005,0.000006602519,0.000029478066,0.013618487,0.000002411801,0.000009373693,0.000060215338,0.94432086,0.000077205994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005198817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041441066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16217539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001932471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003982601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240589568","doi":"10.3138/jsp.42.4.534","title":"Big Journals, Small Journals, and the Two Peer Reviews","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); Peer review; Computer science; Process (computing); Library science; Political science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.25814186757584145,"score_gpt":0.2907891274704021,"score_spread":0.03264725989456063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240589568","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18789434,0.3003606,0.0013792543,0.14490882,0.008026446,0.00069917535,0.000024371386,0.00012486211,0.35658213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95530856,0.013991538,0.004956517,0.0065454566,0.0076760915,0.0000120388995,0.000005121296,0.00007579311,0.011428886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946631,0.0015525225,0.001827389,0.0001992327,0.0013448618,0.00041285602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99010456,0.00049489073,0.0026615441,0.00064108544,0.0057013505,0.0003965537],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.043618906,0.00026924914,0.00067242037,0.00074449443,0.0014339081,0.13281918,0.0027314106,0.00014846293,0.0006421344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020225517,0.00015507785,0.0003981672,0.0002527776,0.00040168248,0.101539284,0.00038458308,0.0057359687,0.00001814321],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053799915,0.00033371217,0.010816448,0.000062014566,0.0005576488,0.00006908757,0.17858453,0.000002694028,0.000231927,0.34515223,0.19415332,0.26949838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028209453,0.00009850719,0.0054089385,0.0005671116,0.00019303423,0.00055177,0.0069333934,0.000016359345,0.00001506889,0.038815666,0.9443295,0.00024968982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006275986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044439425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7674142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009740924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021223919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240959482","doi":"10.3138/jsp.35.4.215","title":"Learning to Work Together: The Libraries and the University Press at Penn State","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Work (physics); State (computer science); Sociology; Scholarly communication; Media studies; Library science; Public relations; Management; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.0284692977110801,"score_gpt":0.19848445917481836,"score_spread":0.17001516146373827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240959482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8460958,0.0028976044,0.00011083721,0.11191835,0.00047174684,0.00016388544,0.00000530751,0.00004711321,0.038289342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98721296,0.00025187572,0.00043100544,0.0012439627,0.0004232068,9.939305e-7,0.0000021333838,0.000016704897,0.0104171755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808645,0.00064824347,0.00034217158,0.00012734965,0.00057251484,0.00022329413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976028,0.0006581052,0.00046459353,0.00032209768,0.0008007396,0.00015162662],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054255817,0.00012482649,0.00019856887,0.00014987227,0.002422913,0.08240371,0.0016930179,0.000062455845,0.00004094928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003301577,0.00007026251,0.000106517386,0.00016341482,0.00034395338,0.07897397,0.0006880097,0.0024719702,0.000005348727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010283751,0.000059286,0.0049673426,0.000015141117,0.00022820802,0.000022619835,0.44192898,0.0015939638,0.000046332956,0.5051743,0.034928005,0.010007451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015045311,0.000092933165,0.004824421,0.00012258587,0.000048413545,0.000028084973,0.03066063,0.000007182351,0.000017937262,0.0065489686,0.9560147,0.00012964894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005176981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001886071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92108667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001553201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012279359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240995240","doi":"10.3138/jsp.43.4.381","title":"First among Equals: Robert Recorde and Innovative Publishing in the Sixteenth Century","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Sign (mathematics); Period (music); History; Classics; Art; Political science; Law; Mathematics; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.03867788732069458,"score_gpt":0.2805268775073408,"score_spread":0.2418489901866462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240995240","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8481389,0.012326451,0.000096732285,0.049156714,0.0020818745,0.00018276474,0.0000049806517,0.000021207175,0.08799037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945801,0.000690671,0.00068224425,0.0015782956,0.0020958672,0.000003924624,0.000001361743,0.000009277931,0.00035824144],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967983,0.00071966875,0.0006435902,0.00013767161,0.0011752468,0.00052556914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968512,0.0011004026,0.00060453947,0.00011741575,0.001080382,0.0002460752],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015896667,0.00013116309,0.0002704641,0.0003932349,0.0009792638,0.022977175,0.0009005363,0.00018829196,0.000051691568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023081891,0.00008742555,0.00007001442,0.0018037123,0.00019000462,0.18749687,0.00016311821,0.002218372,0.000002184486],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019954334,0.00012403892,0.6676643,0.000012756066,0.000038074275,0.000016245409,0.24704826,0.000001926208,0.000005519834,0.026352683,0.04434371,0.01437254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025557203,0.00002875262,0.22035524,0.000106905725,0.000010151657,0.0000070602127,0.035280988,0.000001844388,6.6219474e-7,0.00093680073,0.74290913,0.0001068714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002856492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011127332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6985654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033479763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013485606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9851471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241269769","doi":"10.3138/jsp.33.2.117","title":"Review","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.0829394575173487,"score_gpt":0.28179890803835783,"score_spread":0.19885945052100912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241269769","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030101227,0.79111034,0.00017707104,0.06716471,0.0014963849,0.0002443799,0.000016061205,0.00013052895,0.10955927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76173323,0.11606,0.029766072,0.07859218,0.007520579,0.000009297571,0.000008635764,0.00051261514,0.0057973866],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964621,0.0003061422,0.001115821,0.00015918973,0.0015907611,0.0003660067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99442554,0.0001417522,0.0014483165,0.00036011726,0.0031941263,0.0004301449],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009048676,0.00016492442,0.00045178845,0.0005537816,0.00014215193,0.02925044,0.0014497937,0.00013377992,0.0020821511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025564473,0.00013395792,0.0002999676,0.001247614,0.00003516086,0.23783346,0.00012615763,0.0031517907,0.0014275843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006041505,0.00008504918,0.0027429683,0.00015282401,0.000060655573,0.00010195255,0.00012337671,0.0000030003628,0.001548524,0.00038044326,0.9738994,0.020895746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007241815,0.00009456406,0.0024823488,0.004871126,0.00011808222,0.0014820669,0.00006675225,0.000030287198,0.00006928021,0.00057382917,0.9892996,0.00018788762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000073054166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000015269976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.731632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027198397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000068031964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241418249","doi":"10.3138/jsp.35.1.1","title":"<i>The Journal of Scholarly Publishing</i> : Continuing and Enhancing the Tradition","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scholarly communication; Political science; Sociology; Social science; Library science; Regional science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.0335661994801835,"score_gpt":0.2235455290414156,"score_spread":0.18997932956123212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241418249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85960895,0.033095375,0.0013030845,0.059496697,0.0054912055,0.00027328503,0.000016891612,0.00004997339,0.04066454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99392784,0.0010424141,0.00081056333,0.0013014731,0.0021086743,0.0000025269196,0.000003492751,0.000044214925,0.0007587871],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926815,0.002198811,0.0022208113,0.00019646955,0.0021741218,0.0005282725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818159,0.0029628722,0.0038849236,0.0006691606,0.010273019,0.00039412486],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05010652,0.00029303093,0.0005051382,0.0006405465,0.002633006,0.41860762,0.0031881372,0.00026615293,0.000056801873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06119062,0.00017658291,0.00030162287,0.0004019127,0.0004025862,0.4449107,0.00019748927,0.008342449,0.0000024420415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033754946,0.00030522584,0.005525281,0.00007526053,0.0006746667,0.000052975454,0.13384177,0.000037790378,0.0073619513,0.63028055,0.1504171,0.071089864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018482512,0.00039431002,0.002993462,0.00065515365,0.00024928863,0.0010987882,0.06282815,0.00002223458,0.00052237284,0.030963162,0.89809275,0.00033208402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013609462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003133377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7476756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002498555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057626545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99866545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241439935","doi":"10.3138/jsp.37.1.19","title":"Halted by the Archive: The Impact of Excessive Archival Restrictions on Scholars","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Digital and Traditional Archives Management","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Archivist; Narrative; Sociology; Archival science; Library science; Special collections; Media studies; Law; Political science; Art; Computer science; Literature","score_opus":0.037016266389388555,"score_gpt":0.2556240789320115,"score_spread":0.21860781254262296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241439935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5523661,0.00015801325,0.000120502955,0.02279451,0.0003199609,0.0001585341,0.00025985227,0.000015823414,0.4238067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959082,0.000045744233,0.00010161754,0.00071490486,0.0012786797,0.0000039495358,0.000018209597,0.00001404776,0.0019146397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981379,0.00017055399,0.0005353573,0.00011902884,0.0008137034,0.00022347357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802333,0.00060800434,0.0006456452,0.0002149518,0.0003877151,0.00012033743],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088390114,0.00014535795,0.0001774194,0.00028688172,0.0006907898,0.01514535,0.0010457594,0.0000142697545,0.00010073925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00068463443,0.000068446316,0.00035196007,0.00012415335,0.0002971516,0.026035622,0.000112916336,0.0015544898,0.000014040479],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017937204,0.000546182,0.00038085744,0.000008971405,0.0005509754,0.000010647465,0.007037805,0.0015593659,0.0002510662,0.603398,0.30327103,0.08280572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012975201,0.001259504,0.1880547,0.0003033373,0.00013490756,0.00010617239,0.0034397296,0.00022462684,0.000073209245,0.16797276,0.63684845,0.00028511824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019951878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019061037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44354212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007190988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011526897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98758674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241464621","doi":"10.3138/jsp.35.1.47","title":"The Commensality of Book Reviewing","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Health Sciences Research and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Sociology; Epistemology; Social science; Aesthetics; Engineering ethics; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.2485734853246614,"score_gpt":0.4864837246476415,"score_spread":0.2379102393229801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241464621","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.531591,0.06447045,0.0013654782,0.26620603,0.010529899,0.0011799579,0.000007540437,0.000025564357,0.12462407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9653532,0.00809355,0.0045434083,0.01652736,0.0015659018,0.00001900125,0.0000015207606,0.000022091659,0.0038739743],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945258,0.0024970775,0.0012872942,0.000089079316,0.0010924361,0.00050831644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920442,0.0026383745,0.0013014543,0.00027155943,0.0033299893,0.00041438965],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.049819864,0.00006303279,0.00022345105,0.00015413211,0.0014756052,0.0017259382,0.000721122,0.00011466684,0.0001903452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06691176,0.000036559726,0.0000824488,0.0005716864,0.00007683748,0.028199844,0.000063291816,0.002977539,0.000014987733],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031354695,0.000055574877,0.16265,0.0002912142,0.000022479822,0.0000023148607,0.004331137,0.0000020901696,0.00035852118,0.01257175,0.8091476,0.010535966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002769691,0.00006767706,0.033579506,0.00044942668,0.0000056308077,0.000007196588,0.0065952865,0.0000055293513,0.000032938977,0.0023734267,0.9565684,0.00003796857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011268282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001961101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43376216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002606562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002759773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241700864","doi":"10.3138/jsp.37.1.33","title":"Archie Turnbull and Edinburgh University Press","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Scottish History and National Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Publishing; Sociology; Higher education; Media studies; History; Management; Law; Political science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03485515552012731,"score_gpt":0.20738074454983074,"score_spread":0.17252558902970344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241700864","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7553421,0.0028991678,0.00006945814,0.009353538,0.0014296079,0.000057840545,0.000018082399,0.000026936092,0.23080327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9609206,0.00015790151,0.00075210334,0.0005117694,0.0037466025,1.03032555e-7,0.0000018911942,0.0000075473367,0.03390153],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910045,0.000053409927,0.00021598897,0.00008559271,0.00043534755,0.00010919763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860907,0.000100398196,0.00026460487,0.00006377372,0.0008347661,0.00012739698],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011725749,0.000064893,0.00011755798,0.00025571173,0.00035840966,0.009458603,0.00032598956,0.000047983947,0.0004504705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006027017,0.00006096659,0.000066269524,0.000036438316,0.00010446724,0.071959436,0.0000689518,0.0007502118,0.0000021379735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013600409,0.00015384657,0.0026830188,0.000017430344,0.00012911034,0.00007784637,0.012491497,0.000037693477,0.0002031807,0.41954747,0.5484004,0.016122505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041369032,0.000038421884,0.0022516472,0.000032240976,0.000028550694,0.000043220414,0.0009067931,0.00001644841,0.000021894524,0.0010320282,0.9951425,0.000072518116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000106611675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015655265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44674215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010012069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000663856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9915697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241791749","doi":"10.3138/jsp.37.4.270","title":"Electronic Publishing in Archaeology","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Electronic publishing; Archaeology; Library science; Computer science; Engineering; World Wide Web; History; The Internet; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.009645950911109018,"score_gpt":0.2175701243697946,"score_spread":0.20792417345868558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241791749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5173373,0.004066146,0.42892697,0.03821538,0.0018422593,0.000069134294,4.9991985e-7,0.00009201153,0.009450278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95039684,0.000025479827,0.048337396,0.00043518117,0.00063336873,0.0000010711215,9.735965e-7,0.000009288939,0.00016043059],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766654,0.00019214506,0.00072974304,0.00023473908,0.00065801636,0.000518806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978364,0.00013423021,0.0006703117,0.00021805764,0.0010467758,0.000094229676],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005104875,0.00012096979,0.0002400679,0.001166957,0.00011260206,0.04795008,0.0019490498,0.00020324638,0.000006124992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022812393,0.000108687076,0.00009400216,0.0011440866,0.000057642857,0.2514888,0.00024854546,0.002948095,0.0000026642351],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000464127,0.00023490496,0.14982761,0.000050966813,0.000047845162,0.00035908472,0.001958501,0.0010004755,0.0060130176,0.28461695,0.011288642,0.54455554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041904976,0.00038694884,0.100561276,0.0004711656,0.00002471448,0.008716825,0.0005686793,0.012362113,0.0037981414,0.8175947,0.05058608,0.00073882466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023183934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012133355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54381675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000265384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008084245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99935216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241922992","doi":"10.3138/jsp.37.4.313","title":"Discouraging Verification: Citation Practices across the Disciplines","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Writing and Publishing","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Data science; Management science; Sociology; Engineering; Library science","score_opus":0.0719086328816541,"score_gpt":0.3087760214049235,"score_spread":0.23686738852326938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241922992","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7960222,0.0025269946,0.0005628508,0.15428886,0.002154709,0.00009642788,0.00001986567,0.00005843003,0.044269677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98451215,0.000025982854,0.00038986185,0.0006217637,0.012220438,0.0000032697337,0.000014462968,0.000019914662,0.0021921727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777997,0.00019100268,0.00076658156,0.00015555476,0.00081711356,0.00028977878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946791,0.0006682903,0.0025977849,0.00018887992,0.0017943317,0.00007159164],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073964857,0.0001322548,0.0001735307,0.00015610283,0.0014719052,0.102651745,0.001009236,0.00009645044,0.00008356521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070169517,0.00008230647,0.0001240891,0.00018099553,0.00016324583,0.14427045,0.00010228946,0.00204024,0.000006828958],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008170317,0.00016245784,0.036456723,0.000078428406,0.00012586247,0.00002334834,0.13106444,0.00048270373,0.0018027368,0.5137779,0.29495278,0.020990886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047638724,0.00003866558,0.01750954,0.00019932346,0.00006458628,0.00010553443,0.12103269,0.00016753409,0.000063380074,0.020200258,0.8399232,0.00021888228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005386541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002453621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54497045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000074236596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000110627596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241985672","doi":"10.3138/jsp.41.4.385","title":"Creating a Consolidated Online Catalogue for the University Press Community","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scale (ratio); Search engine optimization; Business; World Wide Web; The Internet; Computer science","score_opus":0.039820298514854115,"score_gpt":0.23554333693710608,"score_spread":0.19572303842225197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241985672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89587086,0.00019353212,0.07419845,0.013901674,0.0014367133,0.0002463905,0.000045308905,0.00010999075,0.0139970975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9611112,0.00001392962,0.035966203,0.0006464099,0.0002520786,5.684519e-7,0.000012330221,0.0000073452006,0.0019899681],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990239,0.00012521696,0.0002633508,0.00008422294,0.00034438516,0.00015893362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99700516,0.0013140393,0.00037796824,0.00027262466,0.0008976708,0.00013256111],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018993014,0.000079954945,0.00012340989,0.00017356481,0.00097545004,0.024599537,0.0026087812,0.0000851342,0.0000039801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039084577,0.000055867793,0.000086392305,0.0004836923,0.00005229911,0.08868324,0.00048402022,0.0018204572,3.9544952e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007559223,0.0017678409,0.06330859,0.00015265854,0.0011651478,0.00016167718,0.0371634,0.000513764,0.010541398,0.22912571,0.45894969,0.1963942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001552459,0.00016233923,0.039553415,0.00005873775,0.00002705007,0.00020970829,0.002674217,0.004424609,0.0012111559,0.001772197,0.94814146,0.00021265283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013095004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005634946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48919177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034661072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003066459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.976413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241998694","doi":"10.3138/jsp.35.3.143","title":"Doing Scholarship on the Web: Ten Years of Triumphs — and a Disappointment","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disappointment; Scholarship; Shadow (psychology); Digital scholarship; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; World Wide Web; Computer science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.05103197946225498,"score_gpt":0.23346149560680002,"score_spread":0.18242951614454503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241998694","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92804235,0.0008069358,0.000006177692,0.0073367464,0.0004989016,0.00012513681,0.000022682732,0.000017468037,0.06314359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968113,0.00006831055,0.00025115977,0.0014051708,0.0007080238,0.0000025986872,0.0000017683959,0.000026327138,0.00072539184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977564,0.00011355785,0.0007014401,0.00016107335,0.0009872104,0.0002803247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978286,0.0003694286,0.0006355355,0.00023888578,0.0007589507,0.00016861351],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034540931,0.00017141005,0.00031178215,0.0003570047,0.0003773173,0.033397015,0.00075071724,0.00008545284,0.00021499027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019317303,0.000115477276,0.00020220989,0.00010180851,0.0002509293,0.04243508,0.00014366991,0.0016425475,0.000009172208],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015267989,0.0002331359,0.0011172126,0.000041430165,0.00017594358,0.00006950517,0.023214327,0.000025053649,0.0003290315,0.9514848,0.00181057,0.021346336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0055525685,0.0024192913,0.021834295,0.0024760629,0.00021594741,0.00025587165,0.046676304,0.000003884247,0.00060409843,0.16010295,0.75912964,0.0007290876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004777179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007344477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79138184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012839472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017390796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9709579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242188979","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.1.63","title":"‘An Inexhaustible Supply of Fresh Literature on the Civil War’","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Race, History, and American Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spanish Civil War; Publishing; Political science; Economic history; History; Law; Classics","score_opus":0.020233849973369144,"score_gpt":0.289990296118265,"score_spread":0.26975644614489586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242188979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8658011,0.003409959,0.00032306268,0.02243223,0.0014963336,0.0001397911,0.000015237255,0.000031619773,0.10635066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99321806,0.0002893279,0.001336093,0.0023679167,0.0019714497,5.618198e-7,0.0000017455546,0.000014800665,0.0008000304],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969989,0.0003469322,0.000536686,0.00014889281,0.0016017274,0.00036684432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99637336,0.0005493352,0.00084954675,0.00025810028,0.0016544092,0.0003152345],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013852544,0.000119523174,0.0002507122,0.00023939185,0.00080942124,0.0059598763,0.0013258923,0.00023232044,0.00019986287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049716113,0.00008210453,0.00022508601,0.0011192346,0.00037492104,0.030563448,0.000035104556,0.0021595333,0.0000030476822],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016903417,0.0004500503,0.055703633,0.000030018631,0.00014058629,0.000094520015,0.2260544,0.000052620737,0.0138567705,0.03804308,0.6512994,0.014105887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006379751,0.0005035061,0.032705117,0.00045353684,0.00004978238,0.000020850644,0.14676584,0.0000065452678,0.00075358344,0.0030481508,0.8147823,0.00027278406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047211224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040561744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16348292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002738882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045946866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242194545","doi":"10.3138/jsp.34.2.123","title":"Letters to the Editor","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Veterinary Practice and Education Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.21939749292002664,"score_gpt":0.4527799563207765,"score_spread":0.23338246340074986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242194545","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45097733,0.00047140513,0.0013138292,0.48575735,0.036229752,0.00019802185,0.0000021513895,0.000015715477,0.02503443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85670805,0.000111425405,0.011327311,0.08967005,0.038826738,0.000029377503,7.771269e-7,0.00003104803,0.0032951955],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975944,0.00085740146,0.0005722668,0.00009204368,0.0005900408,0.00029382706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99659735,0.0010156545,0.00059835723,0.00020922329,0.0013870987,0.00019229928],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008718555,0.00007929145,0.00016098998,0.00019037144,0.0012457648,0.0029368745,0.0004683588,0.00008170495,0.00025948498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020250376,0.000048334205,0.00006886611,0.00038246418,0.000015957701,0.03562619,0.00008854642,0.0027903377,0.00016676438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018063627,0.000022172764,0.028635586,0.00000988175,0.000037154787,0.0000058048404,0.0058671674,0.0000075892135,0.0008853306,0.00083782733,0.9631181,0.0005553683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002554031,0.000058548503,0.03469197,0.00007197455,0.000019870993,0.00003709792,0.023457592,2.7386986e-7,0.0000041375874,0.0001265824,0.94122326,0.00005327247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025901907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000071790055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40573075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017061409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044411502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242302059","doi":"10.3138/jsp.36.1.34","title":"Editor as Good Steward of Manuscript Submissions: ‘Culture,’ Tone, and Procedures","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tone (literature); Set (abstract data type); Context (archaeology); Position (finance); Process (computing); Sociology; Computer science; Management; Operations research; History; Linguistics; Philosophy; Business; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.014484442402154579,"score_gpt":0.23272054369839393,"score_spread":0.21823610129623935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242302059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78837854,0.01801079,0.0015877468,0.06757029,0.010388048,0.00075875554,0.00000892544,0.0001624771,0.113134414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808344,0.00037841272,0.002988229,0.0022532914,0.01247237,0.000002240461,0.0000066602984,0.00002844187,0.0010359233],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982372,0.000008641316,0.0005259059,0.00015315358,0.0008886055,0.00018648582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973507,0.000025630885,0.0007827792,0.00009523115,0.001708402,0.000037238882],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010111814,0.00015162837,0.0002664276,0.0004317379,0.0003019941,0.009052911,0.00045730098,0.00009895681,0.000057831836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044457535,0.00011526451,0.00007683414,0.00058293715,0.000048864935,0.0518365,0.00032074802,0.00046463302,0.000009088349],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019364042,0.00048203944,0.17488545,0.0013536641,0.00052890985,0.00007499761,0.0010237527,0.00014426315,0.0032949944,0.24501339,0.5700709,0.0029339946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003538153,0.00015390656,0.16707096,0.0012106874,0.00037541974,0.000047916194,0.0063997754,0.000010758899,0.0005669049,0.09740268,0.7226995,0.0005233444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014305107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025421925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19245587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004581495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007411852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9919758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242359420","doi":"10.3138/jsp.43.1.39","title":"What I've Learned about Revising a Dissertation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Process (computing); Doctoral dissertation; Epistemology; Sociology; Higher education; Computer science; Literature; Art; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.38530699287939785,"score_gpt":0.5318359899390493,"score_spread":0.1465289970596515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242359420","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92369634,0.007514518,0.0010204739,0.030828547,0.009592484,0.000282705,0.0000022558079,0.00005612901,0.02700657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987211,0.0018144448,0.0047282246,0.0019382681,0.0014174717,0.000008587336,0.000005903219,0.000028897422,0.0028471865],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744046,0.0004964888,0.0010039137,0.00015214598,0.00054893724,0.00035805537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951212,0.00028066974,0.0011920065,0.0002182227,0.0028528154,0.00033510217],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004333637,0.00011707792,0.0002581805,0.00035238397,0.000858203,0.0049756956,0.00047767704,0.00026068292,0.00088713504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061670477,0.00009689293,0.00013581001,0.0003884286,0.000026761541,0.111912936,0.000069411995,0.0028193302,0.00007022649],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004627574,0.00078181154,0.13566399,0.00053749245,0.00035322492,0.00005770952,0.50995344,0.000019082818,0.0021270495,0.10623482,0.089546196,0.15426244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016302938,0.00025934505,0.46279886,0.0042123105,0.00011962735,0.000039477705,0.36909634,0.00004796967,0.00004698164,0.017431121,0.14395842,0.0003592602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014771431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006701868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32713488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024386852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006314796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242426564","doi":"10.3138/jsp.37.4.237","title":"On Commissioning Editors","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Reflective Practices in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Project commissioning; Disposition; Publishing; Management; Orientation (vector space); Computer science; Operations research; Process management; Knowledge management; Engineering; Psychology; Political science; Mathematics; Social psychology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.03054289096335462,"score_gpt":0.362655705610252,"score_spread":0.3321128146468974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242426564","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3076132,0.00026351292,0.0006649012,0.050491586,0.012794344,0.00006819656,4.8476227e-7,0.00002805877,0.6280757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9724526,0.000017950804,0.005582964,0.0004366655,0.020209908,8.5019184e-7,6.7595175e-7,0.00001063496,0.0012877914],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973681,0.00053343584,0.0003831479,0.000100575424,0.0013978664,0.00021686975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99626446,0.0010044718,0.0008410708,0.00011096093,0.0016240979,0.00015492427],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008110326,0.0000697728,0.00011982623,0.0003528526,0.0007607177,0.022933243,0.00065420836,0.00015409381,0.0001310466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029979588,0.0000609868,0.00007800531,0.000526832,0.00006856166,0.09277049,0.000033531127,0.0016293186,0.000012640743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007568243,0.0003934985,0.073353715,0.0000063744324,0.000040661027,0.000024071183,0.010149075,0.00047177708,0.0014786024,0.17187105,0.70888567,0.03324983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024400771,0.00007361179,0.022399385,0.00009144444,0.000015695261,0.000008589337,0.004785698,0.000005332745,0.00015723679,0.06628755,0.90583825,0.00009322138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011666326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006388491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6648394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054293167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056147453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9781913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242514428","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0092","title":"Scholar as E-Publisher: The Future Role of [Anonymous] Peer Review within Online Publishing","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Wikis in Education and Collaboration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Peer review; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Business; Computer science; Psychology; Sociology; Library science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.020948852857970535,"score_gpt":0.3260964141739782,"score_spread":0.3051475613160077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242514428","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30100882,0.014488751,0.000013508115,0.6141966,0.010181321,0.0003775766,0.000021797909,0.000049877734,0.05966174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9016948,0.0049976986,0.017345093,0.034541592,0.026949901,0.000020745214,0.00009690217,0.00010016992,0.014253109],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921917,0.0009855162,0.0013713568,0.00025757973,0.004794816,0.00039905513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97173357,0.0003747638,0.0025263096,0.0005903601,0.024297815,0.00047718358],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.041374378,0.00019633028,0.0004145757,0.00041323673,0.0011782435,0.0674212,0.003168365,0.0005157448,0.00064693345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12550752,0.0001407308,0.00023748892,0.0025747323,0.0002179525,0.19554092,0.0001592472,0.0074692657,0.000009490652],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004196291,0.00040399385,0.011198224,0.000092638606,0.00011465708,0.000006918682,0.031383004,0.000008666404,0.0026824684,0.14268745,0.74020785,0.07117216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030804626,0.00004702692,0.0045222095,0.00035022348,0.00006863121,0.00003716007,0.07249188,0.000003829932,0.000077855155,0.010321797,0.9116172,0.0001541173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086913997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034249604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60068595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019240528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039711306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99482054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242642738","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.2.274","title":"The Value of Knowledge Created by Individual Scientist and Research Groups","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Knowledge management; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.1869300475568305,"score_gpt":0.444525762649283,"score_spread":0.2575957150924525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242642738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9764783,0.004061745,0.00025131236,0.009356959,0.0004478488,0.000116430645,0.000023338913,0.0000040964783,0.009260004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956024,0.000091631795,0.00035484694,0.000028534627,0.00028144423,0.0000020283157,0.0000019913148,0.0000075596267,0.0036295415],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99032307,0.0016319086,0.0010545264,0.0002510508,0.006326,0.00041346942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98108065,0.0035465304,0.0006118693,0.00035989334,0.014059265,0.0003417662],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06069816,0.00009071103,0.0002439352,0.0010552532,0.0020701443,0.034843568,0.0025974114,0.00012290027,0.000036238387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04552531,0.000051323623,0.0000884701,0.0037146811,0.0007785461,0.04559123,0.0007040921,0.0018486212,0.000013200097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036056872,0.00020525062,0.06963907,0.000006609102,0.000072025316,0.000059297417,0.008364964,0.000007726918,0.00969794,0.010223356,0.88365984,0.017703328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003387947,0.0031205148,0.5877971,0.0002822698,0.000031970776,0.0011475326,0.047487784,0.0011555688,0.007336122,0.06825715,0.2796315,0.00036456887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021675512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000047683487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6040284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009989737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000910827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242703513","doi":"10.1353/scp.2004.0019","title":"Writing Successful Covering Letters for Unsolicited Submissions to Academic Journals: Comment","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Library science; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.573081142464283,"score_gpt":0.56947874865817,"score_spread":0.0036023938061129357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242703513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7012161,0.0011212862,0.12907712,0.1668872,0.0009162239,0.00025432647,0.000026750964,0.000014399217,0.00048661407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9701155,0.000201223,0.017329214,0.011198308,0.0010355593,0.0000062355543,0.0000014474365,0.000028329823,0.000084195126],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9814835,0.00028659342,0.0026284591,0.0004997304,0.014076414,0.0010252747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97289073,0.006238474,0.0019150587,0.0005266449,0.01639564,0.0020334683],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.092327274,0.00021892668,0.00059083715,0.063293576,0.0008624563,0.13122219,0.0064248717,0.00026876025,0.00009523869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24748841,0.00015888365,0.0004228203,0.08513451,0.000057220772,0.077416874,0.0009898177,0.0033774402,0.000022565588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029783387,0.00033821323,0.36221313,0.000030929314,0.00017242572,0.00016847237,0.0019503497,0.017889105,0.14593762,0.003742596,0.2785831,0.18867622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010280841,0.0014334391,0.29919994,0.0017319822,0.00009636224,0.0009915011,0.011003764,0.0013929651,0.013995611,0.05679202,0.6017509,0.0013306915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006467821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000034837526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3231678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008665951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006004658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99895084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242730467","doi":"10.3138/jsp.43.4.440","title":"A Short Note on Short Notes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Focus (optics); Publication; History; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.6367200351995497,"score_gpt":0.5627808514479131,"score_spread":0.07393918375163655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242730467","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95640296,0.001972999,0.008686144,0.008806874,0.0032619697,0.000111516885,0.000011689319,0.000015940392,0.020729931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99298364,0.00007902786,0.00411887,0.0008539339,0.0015579942,0.00000119451,8.548206e-7,0.000017523516,0.0003869635],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97429967,0.0004140398,0.0015160183,0.00036207773,0.022460375,0.0009478091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97327137,0.009231825,0.0005563324,0.0007914499,0.014420446,0.0017285919],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.12181847,0.00018613697,0.00046868363,0.06331486,0.00035697423,0.13372979,0.005145093,0.0002916147,0.00027173056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36659026,0.00011749222,0.00038423797,0.09066738,0.000082744205,0.14340325,0.00075402344,0.0029210034,0.00017222493],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037888345,0.00020527739,0.61313474,0.0000016332285,0.000021988655,0.000028149845,0.00020275776,0.000027038648,0.0017918159,0.0009285277,0.033363085,0.3502571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034229466,0.0003531903,0.81855536,0.000043212385,0.00001709246,0.00021482994,0.00045616593,0.00022313048,0.0026847427,0.0032577687,0.17360091,0.00025129318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017923408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000023738357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3500058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003341187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002967587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243028799","doi":"10.3138/jsp.37.4.288","title":"Recent Trends in Scholarly Communications: 2001-2005","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Web visibility and informetrics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Geography; Telecommunications; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06354226654063623,"score_gpt":0.29406125750263756,"score_spread":0.23051899096200135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243028799","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1966153,0.053130668,0.10331625,0.3713918,0.0043595606,0.00045056568,0.000023731294,0.0003386273,0.27037352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60215044,0.004183976,0.38551506,0.005346004,0.000966457,0.000006664114,0.000026484582,0.000036903224,0.001768041],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962238,0.00029617106,0.0013778122,0.00023048713,0.0013209132,0.000550802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99529713,0.00028589068,0.0008648244,0.0012462043,0.0020496643,0.00025628225],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012724031,0.00015961692,0.0003072369,0.0029027888,0.00022772833,0.06097714,0.005967542,0.00024263187,0.000049162874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005400543,0.00014567302,0.00014996796,0.0047074743,0.000053898115,0.31500825,0.0007537133,0.0031904334,0.000014592449],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025020448,0.0006997945,0.060390957,0.00001058407,0.00003095715,0.000048061207,0.0005485197,0.0002831512,0.00037264937,0.086163595,0.118277006,0.7331497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013239244,0.00015182774,0.20904846,0.000104245344,0.000009343642,0.00014393376,0.00014522694,0.0032580148,0.000102614395,0.012555387,0.7728961,0.00026089634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002565033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037830308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7328888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077081006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047689103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243217097","doi":"10.3138/jsp.40.4.440","title":"Online Review of Manuscripts: More haste, less speed?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Process (computing); Computer science; Password; Work (physics); Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Computer security; Engineering; Epistemology","score_opus":0.17932841828729712,"score_gpt":0.4135443038488713,"score_spread":0.2342158855615742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243217097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4951733,0.107734516,0.0025597517,0.3545451,0.003403221,0.00037340494,0.000101221325,0.000052602514,0.03605689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8824149,0.013220362,0.015854262,0.077898785,0.0040304456,9.473264e-7,0.000031561303,0.000059659567,0.0064891274],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878302,0.0005585095,0.0036634488,0.00044666437,0.0070395144,0.00046162104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842424,0.0009093567,0.0046134484,0.00085792,0.008827805,0.00054907467],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03684213,0.00026483598,0.0011530818,0.001249047,0.00018575857,0.038497988,0.009273649,0.00036934213,0.00023739654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12148607,0.00017908006,0.0004946107,0.0029677162,0.000108562155,0.20831507,0.00043973938,0.004168453,0.000012053115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048891787,0.00027205911,0.012682539,0.00014668259,0.000047684924,0.00008306938,0.00037492553,0.000038922837,0.00047556072,0.0011421051,0.7327477,0.25193986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027013985,0.00066983775,0.2502291,0.024333993,0.00023972138,0.001432899,0.0102152545,0.0002611196,0.00056700886,0.05014073,0.65831834,0.0008906318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000047746682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000043473974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38724154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014606994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005720311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99812895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243280388","doi":"10.3138/jsp.40.3.263","title":"A Benevolent Conspiracy: Conrad Richter, Paul Reynolds, Jr., and Alfred A. Knopf","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.03649103086830612,"score_gpt":0.2971643014455622,"score_spread":0.2606732705772561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243280388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86296606,0.0019623146,0.00011624824,0.11529636,0.0006400613,0.000112438574,0.000004970966,0.000033528926,0.018868044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925788,0.00030617116,0.0016503484,0.004017418,0.00082993106,4.2850883e-7,0.0000021940482,0.0000047541957,0.0006099389],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767834,0.00022380477,0.00052027253,0.00017970287,0.001075766,0.00032212856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981394,0.00014504342,0.0005591157,0.0001263589,0.0005984417,0.00043168486],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004009261,0.000107585634,0.00020754315,0.00024408095,0.0005997632,0.026610676,0.0006600302,0.00016855758,0.00006843158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030886172,0.000091628215,0.000080250684,0.0005201646,0.00012099863,0.12902328,0.000039730014,0.00076188,0.0000051840266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019934906,0.0006850657,0.19666712,0.000022783248,0.00012217542,0.00052429776,0.043754146,0.000012946533,0.03085199,0.18510838,0.25790134,0.2841504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001990796,0.0011980216,0.25244838,0.0002991806,0.00007055185,0.00014598646,0.016507754,0.000056196153,0.0005601227,0.08179966,0.6444219,0.0005014514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000112472546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004819578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38652053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007514762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064787205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9743998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244103491","doi":"10.3138/jsp.38.1.14","title":"The Decline and Fall of Bottom Notes, <i>op. cit., loc. cit</i>., and a Century of the <i>Chicago Manual of Style</i>","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Historical and Literary Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Style (visual arts); Taste; History; Citation; Scholarship; Function (biology); Literature; Art; Law; Political science; Psychology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.012411215428737209,"score_gpt":0.24373113927706408,"score_spread":0.23131992384832686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244103491","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9528149,0.022880532,0.000032378484,0.018214146,0.00045528583,0.000105876046,0.000025651805,0.0000050605963,0.005466205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99651515,0.0017426298,0.00060922425,0.00034579725,0.00040510006,5.987481e-7,4.3773443e-7,0.0000067195133,0.00037431155],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745446,0.00033629956,0.00078785856,0.000119810764,0.0010785315,0.00022301482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969024,0.00090610463,0.001020027,0.00014305704,0.00092111307,0.00010730777],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038655116,0.00010642259,0.0003353653,0.00009130269,0.0005706958,0.0013577186,0.00065586495,0.00012283771,0.000004525315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033186337,0.000059811166,0.00013108418,0.00045793693,0.0005823955,0.0071849027,0.00025102924,0.00083025283,8.4575724e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036216681,0.00048831134,0.7932523,0.00017557631,0.0002977892,0.00001707748,0.044098128,0.0000117795225,0.006080294,0.06556499,0.04251336,0.04713822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083842396,0.00015996405,0.1873834,0.00021164164,0.000083959065,0.0000116227775,0.004525055,0.000004870837,0.0001583594,0.006085575,0.8004096,0.00012748319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030409924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011857892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7578963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049427188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016396352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244270679","doi":"10.1353/scp.2012.0029","title":"The Church and Peer Review: Was 'Peer' Review Fairer, More Honest Then Than Now?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Medical Research Council","keywords":"Peer review; Peer-to-peer; Computer science; Law and economics; Sociology; Internet privacy; Political science; Law; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.18631469466513195,"score_gpt":0.4366620134434347,"score_spread":0.25034731877830274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244270679","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015690926,0.4896884,0.00015723711,0.4839578,0.0011220389,0.000260441,0.000007780217,0.000014349925,0.009101035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20420739,0.68911076,0.0017419955,0.022103986,0.0047837542,0.000020607653,0.000006786349,0.00006086708,0.077963874],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97741616,0.0012108429,0.0018523403,0.00042258835,0.018192483,0.00090561016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97639453,0.0050042993,0.0014993165,0.0010111174,0.014847985,0.0012427218],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20146458,0.00024134865,0.0006775965,0.00045819767,0.0010917456,0.052978374,0.00533694,0.00018906571,0.00021763731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23350209,0.0001143995,0.0003579464,0.0024317822,0.00038329107,0.12916051,0.0006354261,0.004218273,0.00009022415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005825976,0.000018368544,0.024391543,0.0001169168,0.000019084922,0.000011132742,0.00059452315,3.9988623e-7,0.00013600134,0.00056222844,0.86833763,0.10580636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015412374,0.000038710074,0.0884024,0.0031780235,0.000031869273,0.00038122144,0.001008866,0.000022979017,0.000014286078,0.0018747457,0.90474576,0.00014700432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025720808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004724529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4618538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011791372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005110733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99807906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244289965","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.1.33","title":"Authority 3.0: Friend or Foe to Scholars?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Minor (academic); Permission; History; Law; Political science; Genealogy; Media studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.0338765884333175,"score_gpt":0.27852824977262075,"score_spread":0.24465166133930324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244289965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6449759,0.000755771,0.28608724,0.047337245,0.004376905,0.00015747616,0.0000026610812,0.00015406412,0.01615274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7414564,0.000010650507,0.24928185,0.006937195,0.0014307521,6.64362e-7,6.81887e-7,0.000018520665,0.00086327636],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967214,0.00013751542,0.00084476714,0.0003161087,0.001437181,0.00054305955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965411,0.0003009145,0.00054535427,0.0005283541,0.001209356,0.00087494054],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009656929,0.00017852975,0.000296834,0.0008724498,0.00030726352,0.06608115,0.004516877,0.0002074643,0.00006854314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029967765,0.00013392317,0.00014426021,0.00192785,0.000016545002,0.3096907,0.0007642048,0.0021479581,0.00003759566],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073259993,0.0007029784,0.11071547,0.00012881446,0.00031847303,0.0033960412,0.016584639,0.00014185638,0.012508677,0.26769584,0.13095842,0.45611617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001187199,0.0007399873,0.23110253,0.0002478919,0.000020662234,0.0007732184,0.0012766502,0.0002127596,0.0032512392,0.010906432,0.7497919,0.0004895289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000039726245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035012385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6188335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010604027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039245456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93488836},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4244406351","doi":"10.3138/jsp.36.4.187","title":"The Changing Market for University Press Books in the United States: 1997-2002","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Digital Platforms and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Distribution (mathematics); The Internet; Library science; Market share; Economics; Business; Marketing; Computer science; World Wide Web; Mathematics; Finance","score_opus":0.02500704039933521,"score_gpt":0.19824280744770928,"score_spread":0.17323576704837407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244406351","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9118744,0.000245006,0.0005080275,0.016992088,0.00048165058,0.0002614246,0.000009648194,0.000021346683,0.069606386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811972,0.00016173869,0.0004782043,0.010044483,0.0033968294,0.0000023935913,0.000030167097,0.000033867873,0.004655115],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990349,0.000006371608,0.00032637248,0.000089326044,0.0002351204,0.00030795243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870753,0.00025905087,0.0004963719,0.00013075088,0.00038863998,0.000017657754],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004564007,0.00009645874,0.00012326748,0.0004400494,0.00042341332,0.048825264,0.0009676548,0.000059009155,0.000012337877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000748971,0.000060111557,0.00009882,0.00038452374,0.000025408504,0.14045313,0.00014945368,0.0005675995,0.000003215648],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060984923,0.00017578027,0.0038628692,0.00010917648,0.0001650151,0.000043567714,0.0016562716,0.0045008203,0.000006732946,0.18241882,0.742149,0.06430212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006572447,0.000010288995,0.0008522921,0.000047214653,0.000019438474,0.00000677125,0.011647308,0.010850002,0.000001060596,0.0022913392,0.97353053,0.00008652551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012413933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012499264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23138154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000093103976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002487723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95216215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244416609","doi":"10.3138/jsp.35.2.65","title":"Deep Structure: Copyright, Contracts, and the Business of Publishing","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Management; Sociology; Library science; Business; Media studies; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.016907309934127073,"score_gpt":0.19806216321475753,"score_spread":0.18115485328063047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244416609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8168126,0.009959759,0.007363588,0.09172533,0.0034413354,0.0005601285,0.0000058031014,0.00007947787,0.070052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928549,0.00009290474,0.0006993693,0.003845671,0.0024201928,0.0000010460896,0.00000526683,0.000028730956,0.000051910385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737334,0.000046641744,0.0009849764,0.00021200145,0.0010538603,0.0003291948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99281037,0.00028304444,0.0014913147,0.00026098272,0.0051046526,0.00004964198],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038605987,0.0002307101,0.00052587135,0.00060144777,0.00039185016,0.06797964,0.0012755669,0.00021196523,0.00042596154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01801687,0.00012496299,0.00015524091,0.0012044079,0.00027065835,0.21946087,0.00035891746,0.0018015122,0.0000049186406],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00693039,0.00081145886,0.019922705,0.0014052466,0.0017576225,0.00030509455,0.007145488,0.0017713782,0.021616492,0.50317335,0.27894258,0.15621817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.036490016,0.0001600185,0.081209265,0.0018745097,0.0010232412,0.0007736081,0.003959015,0.008895897,0.0021683972,0.44277245,0.41923872,0.0014348874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011821642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017278374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17604232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007807719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016323925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9902548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244428301","doi":"10.1353/scp.2007.0012","title":"Subject Indexes to Poetry: Historical : (See Patriotism. )","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patriotism; Poetry; Subject (documents); History; Literature; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Political science; Art; Computer science; Law; World Wide Web; Politics","score_opus":0.05574317038538279,"score_gpt":0.2432628028452856,"score_spread":0.1875196324599028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244428301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74979234,0.0014298109,0.00028498247,0.0057079038,0.004855763,0.00012878704,0.000016287435,0.00006866123,0.23771547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97144324,0.000011123456,0.00043465215,0.002569427,0.004990396,8.774452e-7,0.0000030555177,0.00004097749,0.020506285],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99667937,0.000071060196,0.0010537079,0.00021833178,0.0014025582,0.00057496974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963851,0.00030967235,0.00054902985,0.00024221411,0.0019360146,0.0005779799],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055920244,0.0002306293,0.00041366194,0.0010361121,0.00051630696,0.05893674,0.0011165394,0.0001589107,0.00084095396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003278942,0.0001932692,0.00029018382,0.00021920586,0.00006390514,0.08101896,0.0001815783,0.0021335261,0.000053710803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051705126,0.00045862948,0.025112536,0.00006138556,0.00022797345,0.0008367761,0.05791654,0.000009385808,0.00037153618,0.3949953,0.4344404,0.0850525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004946914,0.00050300814,0.0075082406,0.00011366279,0.00003200105,0.00009480402,0.0068342434,3.5291822e-7,0.000046926834,0.0063028634,0.9777901,0.00027906627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037410407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010040558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54334974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008794857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016268098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94204015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244460737","doi":"10.3138/jsp.37.3.215","title":"Fair Use in Theory and Practice: Reflections on Its History and the Google Case","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Expansive; Publishing; Perspective (graphical); Margin (machine learning); Public relations; Sociology; Law and economics; Economics; Marketing; Management; Business; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.09025816502970128,"score_gpt":0.2872721751564041,"score_spread":0.19701401012670278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244460737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6819935,0.0065071937,0.00018459806,0.023728117,0.000990639,0.000242048,8.453714e-7,0.000034980832,0.2863181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99201816,0.000069258575,0.00013700625,0.0050017056,0.0010373167,0.0000020096893,6.360621e-7,0.000014621022,0.0017193008],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998828,0.00017852636,0.00038943437,0.00014112862,0.00030850756,0.00015441212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732554,0.0013267632,0.00043565183,0.000111920555,0.000781743,0.000018362029],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006783393,0.00011175459,0.00016982891,0.0005055272,0.00027930233,0.016242163,0.00018225532,0.000085248896,0.00015701416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022367306,0.000065802284,0.0000509267,0.0003008851,0.000091645015,0.11030468,0.00012113859,0.0012225866,0.0000072559774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0044476697,0.0004152893,0.0021701308,0.00009025172,0.0001095291,0.0016792193,0.0024430843,0.000035030127,0.002042142,0.35499334,0.6196305,0.011943783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026919395,0.00006173926,0.0035162636,0.00015375233,0.00011844488,0.002324474,0.0030748209,0.0010254369,0.00001505321,0.018330822,0.9684734,0.0002138567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016487647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000528551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3488429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014708481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004710316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98586774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244999131","doi":"10.3138/jsp.36.2.123","title":"Review","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Geography","score_opus":0.04562930729181491,"score_gpt":0.30133777278968865,"score_spread":0.25570846549787374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244999131","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07699958,0.67397,0.0004381489,0.1715805,0.0012563663,0.0003159552,0.000020250558,0.00016741104,0.075251825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73304135,0.041886248,0.096930414,0.10962155,0.015423959,0.00000782796,0.000014026303,0.00043036012,0.0026442881],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964683,0.00026880248,0.001197166,0.00015528669,0.0015461503,0.00036430953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99413097,0.00012698758,0.0014793208,0.000337462,0.003493756,0.00043149083],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013448839,0.00016329021,0.0004383784,0.00054356974,0.00012895836,0.027476842,0.0014630548,0.00013193299,0.00059172895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020505482,0.00013241083,0.00029179922,0.0009828421,0.000031134095,0.29643485,0.00013875536,0.0031207483,0.0009987159],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001954636,0.00008568461,0.002711017,0.00012888716,0.00006861229,0.000037772512,0.00011041092,0.000021208907,0.0034887244,0.0007162755,0.9314012,0.061210647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065048534,0.000057057496,0.0035204217,0.0036822136,0.0000967861,0.0009769136,0.00005379976,0.0000114610975,0.00021089647,0.00036470176,0.9902208,0.00015446922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007395576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000063233283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65604174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004366174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031142725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245167715","doi":"10.1353/scp.0.0082","title":"Academic Search Engine Optimization ( ASEO ): Optimizing Scholarly Literature for Google Scholar &amp; Co.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Advanced Text Analysis Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Computer science; Information retrieval; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.031066419338067825,"score_gpt":0.3222108468978427,"score_spread":0.2911444275597749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245167715","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02974896,0.0017517911,0.9595239,0.0071914266,0.0007541754,0.00032952576,0.000016280117,0.00026605633,0.0004178634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.070530824,0.00028157368,0.92674774,0.0009182465,0.0011160738,0.000015366177,0.000037755475,0.00006135825,0.00029103996],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949989,0.0002992934,0.0013492984,0.00064925343,0.0019539287,0.0007493578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893008,0.0005157547,0.0011918081,0.0010197489,0.0073609753,0.0006109401],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013935222,0.00038841838,0.0006024827,0.0020423513,0.0007692972,0.086746484,0.005178427,0.000913442,0.00002925353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016809413,0.00035588993,0.0004369713,0.0025370137,0.000067379784,0.35957772,0.00054039655,0.014651058,0.000007667641],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003206318,0.0006311938,0.008652884,0.0002817841,0.00080009416,0.00020918545,0.0071632415,0.11234448,0.5295895,0.056394525,0.037473373,0.24613912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01029006,0.0015027272,0.002966792,0.0028298516,0.0004789938,0.0034186938,0.000706518,0.26712322,0.11905401,0.050327737,0.5371332,0.004168151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004997771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000025393995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49965987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026657697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000482619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998893},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4245289973","doi":"10.3138/jsp.41.1.92","title":"The Current Status of the Publishing Industry in China","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Big Data Technologies and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Prosperity; China; Dominance (genetics); Information industry; Business; Economics; Economic geography; Economy; Economic growth; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1730678444820716,"score_gpt":0.3784927582432827,"score_spread":0.2054249137612111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245289973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7736214,0.004556739,0.00045297394,0.21579233,0.0009830003,0.00016115603,0.000032895627,0.000017075296,0.004382452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983143,0.00037912358,0.00060351554,0.0004397126,0.00018782481,0.0000016458782,8.5501415e-7,0.000005083106,0.00006789219],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947799,0.0002669345,0.0015296476,0.00022652434,0.0027455173,0.00045148798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99431676,0.00093718193,0.0019914128,0.0010386886,0.0015498742,0.00016608044],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015026483,0.00011853454,0.0002621411,0.0004861769,0.0004363192,0.055206638,0.0068664653,0.00040647632,0.000015432533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09351587,0.000055379594,0.00017270351,0.0032860537,0.00014596623,0.07615182,0.00066619494,0.009738802,0.0000020074242],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010688844,0.00006737413,0.06228465,9.474006e-7,0.00000578681,0.0000014752956,0.00021855763,0.000057671463,0.00019638844,0.017909372,0.074008696,0.8452384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002519689,0.00003244581,0.57042813,0.0000758657,0.000005213279,0.000014098981,0.0013953698,0.000050858896,0.000113867456,0.12081666,0.30675778,0.000057736266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007379554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006916944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84518063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015881468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050125184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99850684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245669358","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44.2.170","title":"Book Reviews","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Writing and Publishing","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Art; Sociology; Anthropology; Visual arts","score_opus":0.07606869692161192,"score_gpt":0.2670771720667448,"score_spread":0.1910084751451329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245669358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020717796,0.45430535,0.0002573853,0.03754333,0.0076975287,0.00017403196,0.000011273219,0.00009186418,0.47920144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7024541,0.006996586,0.003964974,0.09051439,0.115607634,0.000010920404,0.000017604696,0.00014531988,0.08028848],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757737,0.00022487348,0.0009304894,0.000096544194,0.00071892544,0.00045177605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972856,0.00019617534,0.0010173604,0.00016692262,0.00096358085,0.00037036563],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010649526,0.00014910137,0.00035096888,0.00034250258,0.00038911068,0.03690237,0.0008421135,0.00014978135,0.0025525477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007687823,0.00011131987,0.00022689551,0.00009468908,0.00007181936,0.27166966,0.00010277718,0.0028600225,0.00008264337],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064282926,0.000034976656,0.0025009417,0.000025344541,0.000021092277,0.0000029094097,0.014399156,3.5468378e-7,0.00005291394,0.041541554,0.93173397,0.009680348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002251611,0.00003119529,0.00040394292,0.00023438258,0.000037911806,0.00009146354,0.0030006631,0.0000015525133,0.000017487871,0.0005839256,0.99523467,0.0001376636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003561269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000029650696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6817363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009403982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000784485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245696625","doi":"10.3138/jsp.41.1.103","title":"Putting Editors to Trouble (or People of That Sort)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Praise; Punctuation; sort; Spelling; Grammar; Simple (philosophy); Object (grammar); Authoritarianism; Linguistics; Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Computer science; Mathematics education; Law; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06645772306943527,"score_gpt":0.26747071705889797,"score_spread":0.2010129939894627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245696625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8250941,0.0011532158,0.0009175682,0.093743674,0.0080803875,0.00029361492,0.000032296015,0.00012791161,0.0705572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840859,0.000027976892,0.006199796,0.0013939133,0.0064798454,0.0000017852526,0.000008195312,0.000022717682,0.0017798728],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99691284,0.0002153556,0.0010007488,0.00018541451,0.0013176812,0.00036797626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950073,0.00033133576,0.0011946487,0.00048577908,0.002663945,0.00031704427],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005979209,0.0001898688,0.0004674203,0.0008357121,0.00052098866,0.053904,0.0020183371,0.00015210634,0.00029179966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007244504,0.00014591283,0.00022913038,0.00033018476,0.000042570988,0.14071943,0.00016235666,0.001984439,0.000008148016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004507911,0.00069524854,0.0169551,0.000071794624,0.00022698681,0.00003278082,0.11519763,0.00014121136,0.0027718365,0.0798974,0.6853371,0.098222084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001592055,0.0012153385,0.0340881,0.0006415969,0.00011050301,0.00008556383,0.018728731,0.00005030905,0.00055676576,0.015076804,0.92741776,0.0004364732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026052608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024763172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24208063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015158352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003014368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9470781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246067270","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.1.54","title":"Musings on Disciplinary Morphology and Nomenclature in the Humanities and Social Sciences: Implications for Book Selection","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Nomenclature; Directory; Sociology; Scholarship; Perspective (graphical); Library science; Social science; Political science; Taxonomy (biology); Biology; Computer science; Ecology; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.13294995514322913,"score_gpt":0.31967563138567234,"score_spread":0.1867256762424432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246067270","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9083156,0.001517546,0.00026231093,0.07279944,0.0002723563,0.00020419162,0.000014407314,0.000018094624,0.016596047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920355,0.000038047972,0.00058411394,0.0062011844,0.00082068564,0.0000067237524,0.000006933225,0.000009446631,0.00029738073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883556,0.0001355695,0.00040096033,0.0001425484,0.0002661324,0.00021921292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982721,0.0006442307,0.00038968597,0.00009501316,0.00057585427,0.000023112587],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0078281425,0.000099649944,0.0001506787,0.00056603673,0.0025817892,0.03949413,0.000578453,0.000112182825,0.00000834987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075490447,0.000069984446,0.000048465987,0.00014133519,0.00039503048,0.044572406,0.00008232093,0.0013519384,1.894379e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082032115,0.00011264105,0.008276768,0.000023240322,0.000022722874,0.0000018884568,0.101571746,0.0000020324421,0.0005529563,0.85900736,0.025195116,0.0051515135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012320547,0.0008883062,0.27008614,0.0001276333,0.000058211033,0.00023247313,0.038061444,0.000028597857,0.000015312473,0.086933576,0.6020634,0.00027285088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005959843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041798316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77207375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008705389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008898712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246165071","doi":"10.3138/jsp.33.4.256","title":"Review","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.0829394575173487,"score_gpt":0.28179890803835783,"score_spread":0.19885945052100912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246165071","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030101227,0.79111034,0.00017707104,0.06716471,0.0014963849,0.0002443799,0.000016061205,0.00013052895,0.10955927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76173323,0.11606,0.029766072,0.07859218,0.007520579,0.000009297571,0.000008635764,0.00051261514,0.0057973866],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964621,0.0003061422,0.001115821,0.00015918973,0.0015907611,0.0003660067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99442554,0.0001417522,0.0014483165,0.00036011726,0.0031941263,0.0004301449],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009048676,0.00016492442,0.00045178845,0.0005537816,0.00014215193,0.02925044,0.0014497937,0.00013377992,0.0020821511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025564473,0.00013395792,0.0002999676,0.001247614,0.00003516086,0.23783346,0.00012615763,0.0031517907,0.0014275843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006041505,0.00008504918,0.0027429683,0.00015282401,0.000060655573,0.00010195255,0.00012337671,0.0000030003628,0.001548524,0.00038044326,0.9738994,0.020895746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007241815,0.00009456406,0.0024823488,0.004871126,0.00011808222,0.0014820669,0.00006675225,0.000030287198,0.00006928021,0.00057382917,0.9892996,0.00018788762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000073054166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000015269976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.731632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027198397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000068031964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246183954","doi":"10.3138/jsp.43.1.110","title":"Making the Journal Abstract More Concrete","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.21308396178284814,"score_gpt":0.3698380251748237,"score_spread":0.1567540633919756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246183954","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8410528,0.0049500256,0.00019431212,0.012679563,0.00453361,0.00006337537,0.0000031702223,0.000017755166,0.1365054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99392605,0.00008748098,0.0019362697,0.0016944591,0.0017551224,0.0000013114974,6.7407126e-7,0.00001985769,0.0005787719],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978199,0.00023365104,0.000812983,0.000111773275,0.00065383577,0.00036787812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964888,0.00041317803,0.0013205754,0.00025718007,0.0013626422,0.00015758806],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061720107,0.00014700892,0.0002253006,0.00021565224,0.00045765738,0.009699767,0.0015176561,0.0002010228,0.0019818475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019106981,0.00008965805,0.00018867535,0.00024197352,0.00013682192,0.026833592,0.000083796825,0.003133419,0.00003408698],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007446483,0.00012579394,0.18018486,0.000034149674,0.0010948657,0.00090700143,0.068556845,0.00002682803,0.0008147643,0.06248078,0.6699989,0.015030583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005250392,0.00020956337,0.86856735,0.000120655546,0.00007936988,0.0063490453,0.070529915,0.0000011786976,0.000025665315,0.008442949,0.044983342,0.00016593318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015676301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000035206199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6883825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010603664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002750588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99916637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246238172","doi":"10.3138/jsp.41.3.354","title":"What Competencies Do Today's Academic Authors Need?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disintermediation; Publishing; Globalization; Order (exchange); Public relations; Sociology; Work (physics); Service (business); Discipline; Media studies; Marketing; Engineering ethics; Political science; Business; Social science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.053079586618846666,"score_gpt":0.2694399451221454,"score_spread":0.21636035850329877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246238172","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87699026,0.0046263724,0.000042386484,0.0627982,0.015507814,0.00011757527,0.000010818834,0.0001176461,0.03978895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879468,0.00048581546,0.0016788065,0.001735536,0.0043612607,0.0000035105381,0.00001216927,0.000041576477,0.003734495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963895,0.00032571243,0.001157593,0.00022981377,0.0014455913,0.00045177215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934984,0.0004803507,0.001256678,0.00066253525,0.0036683534,0.00043370874],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010510738,0.00024735625,0.00040332758,0.0008970814,0.0010173369,0.2504615,0.0033808174,0.00043370508,0.0007686848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009543421,0.00020275004,0.00026789913,0.000251066,0.00027887867,0.4219781,0.00036830915,0.012782919,0.000037188845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072954565,0.00017043634,0.011678014,0.000034011417,0.00017822227,0.00003130149,0.08464308,0.000012877261,0.012190967,0.6804942,0.15948242,0.051011525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005904178,0.00010752424,0.0043452573,0.00027949017,0.000055293374,0.00014044034,0.03519674,0.00003364597,0.00012566835,0.024949668,0.9338735,0.0003023903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014542388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024688584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77439106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001048928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034014424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246268276","doi":"10.3138/jsp.37.4.251","title":"A System Destabilized: Scholarly Books Today","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Politics; Principal (computer security); Character (mathematics); Sociology; Scientific communication; Political science; Social science; Media studies; Epistemology; Publishing; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.03789630717143656,"score_gpt":0.22707425362341702,"score_spread":0.18917794645198044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246268276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5636141,0.006424928,0.0005667778,0.012338984,0.0032571147,0.00025500238,0.000036851976,0.00032381172,0.41318244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883207,0.000021658117,0.0024870036,0.00054366287,0.003498903,0.000008251628,0.00002190192,0.000060838218,0.005037054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99493796,0.0006830955,0.0016783224,0.00030673618,0.0018419063,0.0005519812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906786,0.0004196327,0.0016140378,0.00079883926,0.0061755297,0.00031333254],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010409237,0.00031832862,0.00055939914,0.0010539207,0.0012565036,0.28386864,0.0027927074,0.00029082023,0.00020548141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004654395,0.00026851715,0.00038906353,0.000280462,0.00018119597,0.34537014,0.00029199716,0.0045040837,0.00004485746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011190961,0.00028510828,0.009675104,0.00010140501,0.00014122849,0.000090013324,0.007945316,0.000042241154,0.0019487222,0.87422067,0.09894183,0.0064964714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020096865,0.00026070053,0.0068548312,0.0006781923,0.00014992087,0.0003485934,0.013347137,0.00009287874,0.00018278405,0.013450932,0.96207345,0.00055091805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014822696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044042044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8631316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000635341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046684235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246462165","doi":"10.3138/jsp.35.2.92","title":"Writing Successful Covering Letters for Unsolicited Submissions to Academic Journals","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Writing and Publishing","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Library science; Computer science; Sample (material); History; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07088956019368653,"score_gpt":0.30500079152587295,"score_spread":0.23411123133218642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246462165","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8672527,0.0014174359,0.0097342925,0.1126013,0.0017110035,0.00027700723,0.000059765152,0.000104570216,0.006841929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.970882,0.00007598054,0.004264512,0.01252095,0.011844051,0.000009513746,0.00000814799,0.000075806456,0.00031906608],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99579155,0.00011575202,0.0016912756,0.00029979186,0.0013031702,0.00079846085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99456793,0.0006450632,0.0013317184,0.00020031874,0.0025196525,0.0007353125],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008110837,0.00028999217,0.0005335747,0.0013056631,0.0012655448,0.050282877,0.0017011836,0.0003036336,0.00013970972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01220545,0.00025705353,0.00034453894,0.00037428841,0.00008018296,0.09747634,0.00020003687,0.0048930296,0.000008486999],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058644015,0.00027891123,0.03009255,0.00047173566,0.0006792651,0.00022430126,0.1542493,0.014966358,0.10899536,0.27087632,0.37849188,0.040087584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005035604,0.0003987224,0.004042121,0.006219617,0.0002490007,0.00066047936,0.04088783,0.00008034946,0.0018481382,0.024645464,0.9147055,0.0012271649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016291962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021460313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53621364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003922526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033052836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246479737","doi":"10.3138/jsp.37.1.1","title":"Journals as Innovators and the Innovation of Journals: The Council of Editors of Learned Journals Keynote Addresses MLA Convention 2004","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theme (computing); Convention; Sociology; Media studies; Library science; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.15728473942570784,"score_gpt":0.31395686525564864,"score_spread":0.1566721258299408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246479737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88675874,0.03472541,0.00024771487,0.0656954,0.0024366626,0.00026438243,0.00003504854,0.000016068407,0.009820576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920234,0.0018926997,0.00032374306,0.00062865246,0.00444265,0.0000028906966,0.0000038976623,0.000030415284,0.0006516286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908578,0.0012785128,0.0037489266,0.0001715555,0.003618897,0.0003243449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9610967,0.001410922,0.009587789,0.0005631793,0.02721496,0.00012645568],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.050415047,0.00025502828,0.00081203674,0.00124998,0.0008332885,0.022770625,0.0020966867,0.0002498382,0.0004587396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039427705,0.00015014425,0.00031827437,0.001164,0.0008271127,0.073648565,0.00025320274,0.003950918,0.000001641819],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032774217,0.0013699902,0.02130428,0.000484992,0.0034053752,0.000014938505,0.22007765,0.0012320927,0.036375683,0.35311967,0.23737904,0.12195886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013223592,0.0009973514,0.024576627,0.00581832,0.0009739212,0.00068141834,0.05583739,0.0002848802,0.007478514,0.09443569,0.79494864,0.00074365054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038308377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000091190734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5575696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035071827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021004966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247035974","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.2.127","title":"Opportunities and Strategies for Chinese University Presses with the Rapid Development of Higher Education","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; China; Competition (biology); Elite; Higher education; Mass education; Management; Political science; Marketing; Sociology; Business; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.09590605091653859,"score_gpt":0.24714960652342777,"score_spread":0.15124355560688918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247035974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94563043,0.0036943827,0.00027973048,0.015626168,0.0003286937,0.00013312815,0.000011192941,0.000018349054,0.034277897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99305665,0.00020929708,0.0025720515,0.00020159868,0.00030073375,0.0000019937145,0.000012948579,0.000009818402,0.0036348836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904567,0.000115685754,0.00029443065,0.000078781806,0.00035749256,0.00010793286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967344,0.00023044425,0.000598787,0.00016962415,0.0021941827,0.000072584146],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001358863,0.00009946703,0.00016789566,0.00023249765,0.00090816,0.011237126,0.0006415277,0.000050305265,0.00006402933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022716449,0.000060293405,0.0000454909,0.00007343024,0.00020803466,0.07346524,0.00007423651,0.0005124559,1.3022792e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006617219,0.0005948027,0.011025095,0.0002786823,0.00063575373,0.00001110545,0.26469842,0.00003414229,0.0007487846,0.5374621,0.12932472,0.05452465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005167469,0.00013332884,0.033456635,0.00010788798,0.000041229992,0.000032961558,0.051250815,0.0000034747707,0.000017799695,0.0014579907,0.9128664,0.000114727925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007059301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000093221635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7835417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044703964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011313455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9897893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247480655","doi":"10.3138/jsp.35.3.129","title":"The Futures of Scholarly Publishing","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Futures contract; Publishing; Library science; History; Business; Geography; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Financial economics; Law","score_opus":0.04822615935739133,"score_gpt":0.2452873922877818,"score_spread":0.19706123293039046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247480655","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6483998,0.023960108,0.0005072759,0.16894965,0.006997212,0.00034780832,0.000057893427,0.00016884928,0.15061143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99149513,0.00046840662,0.0019250138,0.0015201583,0.0032356705,0.0000055791934,0.000015646498,0.00005476838,0.0012796258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99388313,0.00058778643,0.0019204599,0.00028514318,0.0027121606,0.00061129517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838355,0.0008811656,0.0026360706,0.0010723904,0.011189036,0.0003858099],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018067285,0.00031304857,0.0005254664,0.00090226217,0.002632134,0.49819794,0.0060695168,0.00036648093,0.00009949723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036842413,0.00021375412,0.00046058325,0.0005179485,0.0004120183,0.5845859,0.0005842765,0.007647817,0.000010839525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001522989,0.00026373292,0.002509188,0.00004238334,0.0003437694,0.000023946228,0.036133185,0.00013676996,0.0013153661,0.8682431,0.056784213,0.03405205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024112293,0.00036955564,0.008363267,0.000567273,0.00012650582,0.00013610559,0.03427991,0.0000112010175,0.0005330105,0.092170194,0.86060727,0.00042448606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001138478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009757784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80382305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040040602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094816304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247603127","doi":"10.3138/jsp.41.3.364","title":"The Joy of Counting","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Keele University","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Point (geometry); Publishing; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; History; Mathematics; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.46913920548307897,"score_gpt":0.5373242602162541,"score_spread":0.06818505473317515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247603127","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9681423,0.001147856,0.0010623481,0.01246393,0.003086357,0.00005494264,0.000004312328,0.0000040256004,0.014033978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99554455,0.00010803686,0.002916196,0.00014459045,0.0005041255,3.521858e-7,1.2165361e-7,0.000007099781,0.00077489775],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9793227,0.0002552602,0.0016751006,0.00022199706,0.018074911,0.0004500435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93068534,0.017201202,0.0031081007,0.0009421245,0.047448482,0.0006147451],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.17878065,0.00008499834,0.0002723315,0.0260362,0.0005322292,0.16819341,0.0072267116,0.0001673151,0.00015510047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.54149103,0.00004246708,0.00023940479,0.07973782,0.00019023904,0.06994892,0.0007164858,0.003214232,0.000018589419],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003300483,0.000077581404,0.48385468,0.000003063457,0.0000342803,0.00001833318,0.00022726445,0.000012678547,0.037523493,0.010754377,0.08021565,0.3872456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065460673,0.00017565349,0.3746588,0.000023574197,0.000010114679,0.00016543719,0.0019053298,0.0006319289,0.0031698283,0.040051725,0.57842386,0.00012913413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044299322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026147767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49820822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004526332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005718088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99908537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247658260","doi":"10.3138/jsp.42.2.226","title":"A Value-Added Role for Reviewers in Enhancing the Quality of Published Research","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Risk Management in Financial Firms","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gatekeeping; Value (mathematics); Quality (philosophy); Constructive; Set (abstract data type); Engineering ethics; Computer science; Management science; Epistemology; Business; Engineering; Advertising; Process (computing)","score_opus":0.07303267525855366,"score_gpt":0.35022114612661187,"score_spread":0.2771884708680582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247658260","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9473105,0.0009283781,0.0007286815,0.027115576,0.0024049284,0.0009521132,0.0000036697334,0.000026640328,0.020529527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921548,0.000060454135,0.002998403,0.0013496022,0.0031704514,0.000029045697,0.000006386103,0.000040351344,0.00019050813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99482304,0.00020314295,0.0019648103,0.00030834542,0.0021150631,0.000585619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900794,0.0011508388,0.0021926365,0.000664653,0.005872412,0.0000400775],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08423679,0.00018206601,0.0005613686,0.0015343962,0.00036805516,0.025681943,0.0025669897,0.0002182452,0.00007312504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10426419,0.00013002343,0.00029869392,0.0025699502,0.00012449792,0.10321024,0.00060200976,0.0036854425,0.000008953071],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005908688,0.00057219097,0.14263998,0.001598139,0.00015447152,0.000017770528,0.0012263722,0.00012613642,0.07499657,0.60489815,0.096487395,0.07669194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027329864,0.00007975212,0.18097253,0.00086926884,0.00009050673,0.0000054006955,0.004565387,0.0004376122,0.0006351932,0.19605872,0.61313146,0.00042117626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016416982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009914796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51664406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009980648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002068966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247706569","doi":"10.3138/jsp.46.1.96","title":"Book Reviews","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curry; Library science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.05665069579184208,"score_gpt":0.2504650920330488,"score_spread":0.19381439624120672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247706569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01980621,0.12341041,0.0019539157,0.09316386,0.0055509275,0.00027772482,0.000008491324,0.00015570698,0.75567275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8359277,0.0053804927,0.0076095895,0.071256496,0.01787126,0.000015828993,0.000035386623,0.00012769674,0.061775528],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972562,0.0006288451,0.0009927726,0.00013699815,0.00073525286,0.00024992597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957729,0.0002769002,0.0011779662,0.00051791314,0.002029184,0.00022515496],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012181949,0.00015008998,0.00037741772,0.00045018713,0.00053063536,0.108114,0.0018556337,0.00011369266,0.0009818892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0142527735,0.00011487021,0.00023822268,0.00011587864,0.000087344495,0.2387898,0.00015358492,0.0024890017,0.00007638929],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012018005,0.000052833235,0.00040479188,0.00001748154,0.000026967567,0.0000019042795,0.0059311036,0.0000022095462,0.0001230557,0.10477098,0.85403407,0.034622587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037248433,0.00010684926,0.00044665107,0.00017632628,0.000030433584,0.000027779772,0.000503962,0.000028689597,0.000015678008,0.004520344,0.993635,0.00013577736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005390288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032870856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8161215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096283744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000093070776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247719959","doi":"10.1353/scp.2006.0017","title":"Index: Volume 37 (2005-6)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Volume (thermodynamics); Statistics; Mathematics; Computer science; Thermodynamics; Physics","score_opus":0.030870858058469404,"score_gpt":0.19395573902236654,"score_spread":0.16308488096389714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247719959","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15795714,0.008819089,0.0022497848,0.007396008,0.008506085,0.000092707654,0.0001379457,0.000034577813,0.81480664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80503887,0.0001407128,0.0016800803,0.00061226025,0.0014430995,0.0000015362691,0.0000039450224,0.000022986576,0.19105652],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981724,0.000013806163,0.0010805052,0.00024602236,0.00012181943,0.00036541623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981249,0.00003758802,0.0011853595,0.00020838596,0.00031075877,0.00013298361],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039550215,0.00012368582,0.00041339663,0.0005111356,0.00019503325,0.0144939115,0.0006916887,0.00013267787,0.0032155288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009937475,0.0001311223,0.00020663657,0.0002794708,0.00006593614,0.043672368,0.00014201795,0.000699648,0.0019194493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000978394,0.000052952084,0.20133846,0.000005227593,0.00005749125,0.000013544167,0.00012790543,0.00016979636,0.000008478258,0.051847212,0.74591297,0.00045615167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006410512,0.000024275503,0.078408524,0.000016884056,0.000007002799,0.000026385982,0.0003889858,0.00018520732,0.0000067898422,0.024027344,0.896107,0.00016052366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029297403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016453398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64708173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024102637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053207783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247755597","doi":"10.3138/jsp.34.3.177","title":"Letter to the Editor","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Veterinary Practice and Education Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.2329392076473887,"score_gpt":0.4427786341140134,"score_spread":0.2098394264666247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247755597","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00041535136,0.00063462683,0.00016778136,0.90142477,0.08071476,0.00030660722,0.000015681524,0.000016250911,0.016304152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000055734436,0.00007223065,0.0013389911,0.68674743,0.29567873,0.000030074214,0.0000073165966,0.000043547723,0.016025929],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938072,0.0022587748,0.0013606645,0.00025263234,0.0016280316,0.0006926775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99059963,0.0024871735,0.0022142513,0.0005727199,0.003940184,0.00018603921],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010059497,0.0002769341,0.00054432784,0.0005526303,0.0017071116,0.008274488,0.0015197508,0.0012388567,0.0006886723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01606094,0.00016951465,0.00023954366,0.0004971631,0.000034615296,0.03988127,0.00032076627,0.034431394,0.0005968616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015859487,0.000014616153,0.00089935877,0.000082861436,0.00014411079,0.000112232374,0.0028535652,7.8548265e-7,0.000009970186,0.0000107410315,0.99545085,0.0004050732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026866834,0.000107904896,0.0009911407,0.00036384363,0.00010910287,0.000090919,0.003521431,1.0722222e-7,2.5276614e-7,0.0001099599,0.9942576,0.00017905894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000060174087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007127732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21496397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004900534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013118492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247823414","doi":"10.3138/jsp.35.1.4","title":"The Price of University Press Books, 1989-2000","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vitality; Government (linguistics); Test (biology); Economics; Management; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01805509441294862,"score_gpt":0.18892403851565773,"score_spread":0.1708689441027091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247823414","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1144983,0.0035426088,0.039129347,0.007857352,0.0015555555,0.00016045755,0.000001990523,0.00006849269,0.8331859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8909713,0.00037133935,0.032554395,0.0006622491,0.00019614321,4.1199934e-7,3.575144e-7,0.000015438423,0.07522835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853176,0.00019247227,0.00032200688,0.00010415328,0.0006783857,0.00017120912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814403,0.0003959596,0.00049645925,0.00019407576,0.0006331242,0.0001363595],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021288379,0.00007200292,0.00011861668,0.00019784417,0.00029956564,0.018661622,0.0016959426,0.000056406403,0.000005547242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020559418,0.00005042838,0.00008742054,0.00068428915,0.00003513803,0.10308108,0.0001927887,0.0004885718,8.889632e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017261581,0.00020120146,0.02453885,0.0000297325,0.00026595918,0.0001144013,0.003844018,0.00018751653,0.0004608077,0.7547244,0.18225771,0.0332028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035442924,0.000056005083,0.005779888,0.000025458972,0.0000039984734,0.000052708492,0.00024697545,0.000054058866,0.001194405,0.0019900443,0.9901698,0.0000722118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000070186616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.6191035e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8079121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000088259956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067841896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9823571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247870585","doi":"10.3138/jsp.36.2.89","title":"A University Press Publishing Consortium for Africa: Lessons from Academic Libraries","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of South Africa","keywords":"Publishing; Library science; Academic library; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.12254125695796865,"score_gpt":0.26552202603167985,"score_spread":0.1429807690737112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247870585","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22738558,0.02314388,0.005146407,0.41595513,0.004765548,0.00074078527,0.0012993534,0.0005420555,0.32102126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9715172,0.00028254936,0.010064866,0.0009569052,0.0052298866,0.0000041612725,0.0000814851,0.00005258553,0.011810361],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968685,0.00041917103,0.0009461985,0.00031231684,0.0009591024,0.0004946941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931172,0.0014257942,0.0014533771,0.00052370614,0.0030985815,0.0003813166],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050221365,0.00024883635,0.00045403067,0.0006218895,0.001204358,0.16849749,0.003714344,0.00041752687,0.0001429023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011848913,0.00023425605,0.00030683627,0.00020140402,0.00021898656,0.47144562,0.00049239263,0.0047712545,0.000004694992],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019840742,0.00011863148,0.0008448884,0.000017347544,0.00021161207,0.000007566402,0.028444178,0.00004269847,0.0002774841,0.50716066,0.44637716,0.01629935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013498977,0.000071377886,0.0009094832,0.00016575019,0.00012929275,0.000011184354,0.011303769,0.0002049215,0.00009799303,0.009143792,0.9763455,0.00026706915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004455885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018024174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7441316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031029363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000527075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247897005","doi":"10.3138/jsp.37.4.307","title":"Views on Popular-Science Publishing","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Science Education and Perceptions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Popular science; Government (linguistics); China; Legislation; Political science; Field (mathematics); Public relations; Law; Science education","score_opus":0.11352007102727892,"score_gpt":0.38016799884129165,"score_spread":0.26664792781401275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247897005","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7029938,0.00040526196,0.0006461264,0.042657334,0.008470884,0.00009768834,0.000005454657,0.000041909254,0.24468154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98401195,0.000006692231,0.0031211693,0.004577938,0.00286108,0.000004308292,0.000004596137,0.000017694694,0.0053945784],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99622136,0.00021317766,0.0008553716,0.00035054891,0.0018220011,0.0005375493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996134,0.00015248983,0.00079626724,0.0004802201,0.002053867,0.00038315076],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011040428,0.00015377645,0.00023019046,0.0015209157,0.0006446876,0.070962824,0.0022387668,0.00019294518,0.0018253304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064057773,0.00012635044,0.00016605976,0.0023631647,0.00021209693,0.14614539,0.00009247886,0.0022655877,0.0002090425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041781313,0.0005877028,0.070370495,0.000004463025,0.000019253692,0.000040359977,0.006016025,0.00008021304,0.008135863,0.15699504,0.7140082,0.0437006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006474151,0.00015213246,0.5943149,0.0000719228,0.000017010067,0.00032753736,0.006458709,0.000011025904,0.00008023426,0.0063846563,0.39132482,0.00020967971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040330863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000051631476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5239444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003482275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005299416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99908715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248012718","doi":"10.3138/jsp.43.4.421","title":"Scientometric Analysis of Nuclear Science and Technology Research Output in Iran","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Science Citation Index; Productivity; Discipline; Scientometrics; Citation analysis; Library science; Nuclear science; Citation impact; Social science; Political science; Operations research; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics; Engineering; Economic growth; Economics; Nuclear engineering","score_opus":0.35651303709658755,"score_gpt":0.5402565706542839,"score_spread":0.18374353355769635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248012718","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9865008,0.0025281296,0.000002631311,0.008705648,0.00013616424,0.00011319871,0.0000012150607,0.000004849437,0.002007376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99855214,0.00011552697,0.0010482814,0.00010558146,0.00009632731,8.326806e-7,2.8768685e-7,0.000007658858,0.00007338373],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953759,0.00024306528,0.0006232645,0.00018877097,0.0028198007,0.00074919773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916621,0.0004456444,0.00026121864,0.00025663528,0.0067840973,0.00059029175],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.059330847,0.00007026785,0.0004567306,0.046472203,0.00027540565,0.0014128367,0.00065762334,0.000256307,0.000036312453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056950897,0.000055576358,0.00005043698,0.0656931,0.0010454213,0.022394015,0.0003671522,0.0034594731,0.0000032506014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011909237,0.00029343518,0.9811271,0.00006126312,0.00007581566,0.000040499857,0.00064381113,7.5790894e-7,0.006597988,0.0014603309,0.00025750772,0.0093224095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007124771,0.00081491144,0.99412954,0.00011643882,0.00007949477,0.00029667802,0.0021689297,0.00019898782,0.00023249448,0.00011883048,0.0010878745,0.0000433189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000818739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000029433038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020981178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042359703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008594502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248460196","doi":"10.3138/jsp.36.2.120","title":"The Promise of Enemies","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Natural enemies; Ecology; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.020128104839889784,"score_gpt":0.29151661578406,"score_spread":0.2713885109441702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248460196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85790783,0.0035565172,0.00006385291,0.075706124,0.0005221486,0.000080775964,0.000002787004,0.0000122505935,0.06214772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99556786,0.00096631475,0.0013046076,0.000349169,0.00089140487,4.0874124e-7,2.604144e-7,0.00000480795,0.00091518014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803084,0.00020274696,0.00044504373,0.000059396152,0.0010321329,0.00022983206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99743736,0.0002599949,0.00055316923,0.00011225898,0.0014907715,0.00014644007],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00687161,0.000056895795,0.00013891324,0.00009113288,0.00054672215,0.010908295,0.0009802644,0.000118136595,0.000019298333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0083866045,0.0000386617,0.00012379805,0.0003026174,0.00016371212,0.039266568,0.00006295794,0.0007926591,0.0000028216946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015981086,0.00030164304,0.04481865,0.000029252968,0.00021402238,0.00002366474,0.075847924,0.00027361437,0.0018560112,0.4498647,0.1328858,0.29372492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033333272,0.000051487586,0.0051860274,0.00006286191,0.000022084894,0.000010315508,0.017838724,0.00004122262,0.00007522885,0.0076049375,0.96869683,0.00007693946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030510637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014411682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.835811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014441383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042470096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999662},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4248596672","doi":"10.3138/jsp.40.3.241","title":"Scholarly Publishing: Reforms for User Friendliness and System Efficiency","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Quality (philosophy); Public relations; Scheduling (production processes); Project commissioning; Control (management); Sociology; Political science; Management; Economics; Law; Operations management","score_opus":0.048167155381380417,"score_gpt":0.25345292808000514,"score_spread":0.20528577269862472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248596672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6734671,0.01162395,0.0066255447,0.12538144,0.006537388,0.0010992415,0.0001700787,0.0005929318,0.1745023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891971,0.00006155935,0.004107658,0.0016299329,0.0029200113,0.00001082482,0.000039180904,0.00004941126,0.001984337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952865,0.00031451994,0.0016428317,0.00043487138,0.0016497222,0.00067150383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98685235,0.00047365006,0.0016886563,0.00076555106,0.00967675,0.0005430547],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0145278955,0.00037513845,0.00065750343,0.0012657887,0.0017555435,0.46341714,0.003161925,0.00043907668,0.000031550004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01811401,0.0002887147,0.00031056514,0.00042264748,0.00015364992,0.56546324,0.00025773878,0.0042427983,0.0000046762293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027284143,0.0002881377,0.0015274382,0.00013433833,0.00012658819,0.000022131606,0.015947692,0.000019029228,0.00057700387,0.90937954,0.04237714,0.029328128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003801368,0.0011752371,0.0064635104,0.0009314113,0.0001877165,0.00033403083,0.024679245,0.00045955306,0.00009553979,0.016762733,0.94435745,0.00075221003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019473993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007258023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9019803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004431664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041284936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248666589","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.1.1","title":"The Changing College and University Library Market for University Press Books and Journals: 1997–2004","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic library; Work (physics); Academic community; Library science; Profit (economics); Sociology; Political science; Management; Economics; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.017533182836311535,"score_gpt":0.19551962861782593,"score_spread":0.1779864457815144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248666589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4730982,0.0188965,0.20724307,0.07945642,0.0024421439,0.00095839717,0.00008205913,0.00030037423,0.21752286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70629543,0.0028971345,0.087075636,0.0020545528,0.001173118,4.0557595e-7,0.0000024984654,0.000050780312,0.20045042],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889743,0.00007978336,0.00023031766,0.00014827929,0.00036947933,0.000274714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99833995,0.0006829589,0.00034928464,0.000104171086,0.0002539543,0.00026967612],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025885745,0.00009467891,0.00013250786,0.00053008966,0.001022332,0.020352531,0.000940149,0.000081826605,0.0000026452335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004596032,0.00007512613,0.000062953746,0.0006228885,0.000054748503,0.113831684,0.00056595623,0.00046072787,6.673523e-8],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001600044,0.00009925797,0.04029573,0.00008165386,0.0004114647,0.00075049384,0.0062139016,0.000010654925,0.00010157681,0.15842178,0.64257866,0.1494348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009893698,0.00008098275,0.012267873,0.00007331882,0.000011104749,0.00017861564,0.0032191589,0.00038214467,0.000121203615,0.0018018946,0.9807527,0.00012163228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000021012258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000021846101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33817407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059908314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020712586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98066443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249203948","doi":"10.3138/jsp.40.3.287","title":"The Editorial Boards of Spanish Scholarly Journals: What Are They Like? What <i>Should</i> They Be Like?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Psychology Research and Bibliometrics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internationalization; Function (biology); Scholarly communication; Endogamy; Library science; Editorial board; Set (abstract data type); Political science; Sociology; Business; Law; Computer science; Biology; Publishing","score_opus":0.10202878998095315,"score_gpt":0.3839209218990114,"score_spread":0.28189213191805823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249203948","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38953558,0.15454623,0.00025497554,0.19602871,0.25081837,0.0007547605,0.00006327001,0.00012309015,0.007875027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82156616,0.06039826,0.0009997239,0.019566668,0.09550563,0.000017424742,0.000013737158,0.0001711396,0.0017612451],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866647,0.0020488373,0.0025472061,0.0006809275,0.0063654245,0.0016929155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980457,0.0023820407,0.0037411088,0.0014169252,0.010759242,0.0012436471],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.032923378,0.00057702634,0.0011297713,0.0060610413,0.0011014934,0.17341165,0.006002475,0.0015117377,0.00024386059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017066767,0.00038824813,0.00090118154,0.0062286654,0.00028469224,0.26089627,0.00039635124,0.012707128,0.0000419568],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001802214,0.00091514195,0.011427954,0.000017330212,0.0007694647,0.00036252348,0.0029638764,0.000007202263,0.004360649,0.0006812148,0.8810003,0.09569215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0062497687,0.0028793914,0.08667208,0.001258939,0.00023409718,0.001436294,0.03190258,0.0000029449075,0.00024417439,0.017193241,0.8512243,0.00070220616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009949357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000073908435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4320306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003405671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073723093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249284743","doi":"10.3138/jsp.43.2.238","title":"Literary Societies in Fiction: ‘A Sort of Mild Mania’","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Contemporary Literature and Criticism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Resentment; Mania; Sociology; Literature; sort; History; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Art; Computer science; Politics; Mood","score_opus":0.08960005286231502,"score_gpt":0.2273205170315092,"score_spread":0.1377204641691942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249284743","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34602976,0.010440666,0.000027278535,0.0024718037,0.0017196386,0.00008279812,0.000023605682,0.000020597321,0.6391839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933403,0.000044448672,0.00046471527,0.0009656804,0.0011423856,0.0000013118521,0.000003867696,0.000013498803,0.004023792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984568,0.000079893536,0.0007603353,0.0001035796,0.00043262544,0.00016679369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983807,0.000057251185,0.000391751,0.00013686574,0.0009545812,0.0000788215],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013193723,0.00011404166,0.00027106417,0.0004085076,0.00010745974,0.006808901,0.00042310404,0.000103275386,0.0010185202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019717563,0.000094233816,0.00018485237,0.00009836983,0.000084779305,0.07705852,0.000056658955,0.0011321178,0.0000023210564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001846474,0.000341161,0.010804229,0.00014244464,0.00012960807,0.00018217941,0.32281607,2.6181914e-7,0.00020881482,0.52670646,0.13441275,0.004071387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014691263,0.00048183269,0.018305246,0.0010430947,0.00006322751,0.0000926386,0.03952559,0.0000053986714,0.0003441674,0.08561985,0.85272425,0.0003255732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000047004072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033365966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7183115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032248005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009456454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249293785","doi":"10.3138/jsp.50.2.05","title":"Letter to the Editors","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Statistics Education and Methodologies","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Computer science; Operations research; Regression analysis; Advertising; Mathematics; Business; Machine learning","score_opus":0.19690380507845445,"score_gpt":0.38567224304094,"score_spread":0.18876843796248555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249293785","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000615581,0.00012211781,0.013037696,0.92807275,0.055871148,0.00019959953,0.000046294565,0.000021666274,0.0025671679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000007203082,0.0000081123235,0.08413131,0.70841783,0.19532418,0.0000045767497,0.000009394183,0.00005323669,0.012044143],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99596107,0.00083641877,0.0009279859,0.0002167801,0.0016763002,0.0003814304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98675925,0.008739722,0.0014683405,0.0006280974,0.0023098271,0.00009478137],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009181183,0.00025977712,0.0005500599,0.00059542246,0.00013962072,0.022283547,0.0021746177,0.0008840814,0.00019784606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10818167,0.00015768327,0.00026838577,0.0003259086,0.000034971097,0.011026393,0.00022123869,0.0112315,0.000118213175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006526514,0.000011287687,0.000031904612,0.00007799018,0.00009834359,0.000052865405,0.00072349206,0.0000022402414,0.0000115009625,0.00040102494,0.9976754,0.0009074331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015343685,0.000054652155,0.00006814882,0.00021037743,0.000111230205,0.00009632656,0.00022050095,7.881707e-7,0.000020307043,0.0205894,0.97829336,0.00018149754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010015061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.822731e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2196549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022248937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048024333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99104965},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4249355217","doi":"10.3138/jsp.37.2.119","title":"Novelist as Scholarly Editor, Mid-twentieth Century","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"African history and culture studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proofreading; History; Period (music); Search engine indexing; Literature; Classics; Media studies; Sociology; Art; Computer science; Aesthetics; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.018255559919134173,"score_gpt":0.2636077520254628,"score_spread":0.24535219210632866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249355217","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16580674,0.020904811,0.00027755264,0.034711294,0.03949064,0.00025511722,0.000021527225,0.00015135827,0.73838097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9441496,0.00042106706,0.0018061685,0.0012504373,0.043155003,0.0000032893067,0.000004730794,0.00003076517,0.009178898],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99572784,0.00039626777,0.00073832634,0.0002447259,0.0023688308,0.0005240135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99474823,0.00016441943,0.00097157806,0.00018897127,0.003587811,0.00033897543],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005687975,0.00019620263,0.00036186093,0.00032768713,0.0020297898,0.03321109,0.0012884333,0.00033858593,0.00022099816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008437308,0.00016992204,0.00030159648,0.0008655346,0.0003225896,0.12660596,0.00012881328,0.0024748857,0.00004151001],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006734819,0.00024463897,0.01898866,0.00001413337,0.000119655,0.000093980176,0.015955536,0.000008549227,0.001974778,0.05586244,0.9037929,0.0028773523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004925745,0.000072855335,0.005957955,0.00007169715,0.00005790001,0.000016386432,0.02200119,1.2366051e-7,0.000037766422,0.005598638,0.96549153,0.00020136584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001840841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056242046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7783429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006735743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007428938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249686102","doi":"10.3138/jsp.35.3.148","title":"Risking It: Scandals, Teaching, Translation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Translation Studies and Practices","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poetics; Poetry; Face (sociological concept); Linguistics; Field (mathematics); Foreign language; Computer science; Politics; Graduate degree; Literature; Translation studies; English language; Sociology; Philosophy; Art; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.091512705378348,"score_gpt":0.29389559817423483,"score_spread":0.20238289279588684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249686102","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10637447,0.013160851,0.008086358,0.15313257,0.003986362,0.00019060845,0.000029999082,0.00009340016,0.7149454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99201065,0.0002447255,0.0036897818,0.001438361,0.0023256731,8.665716e-7,0.0000026956727,0.000017305956,0.00026992566],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982918,0.00011196826,0.00060942705,0.000111224865,0.00068738096,0.00018819074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828595,0.0002005489,0.00067681365,0.00009530539,0.00064071367,0.00010068937],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031547572,0.00011858681,0.00021003012,0.00028004532,0.0008399597,0.027793488,0.0003204982,0.00007000134,0.00030164668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046993105,0.00009446854,0.00015691153,0.000060502804,0.00005553739,0.097303726,0.000018176957,0.0015935912,0.00001077286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019771155,0.00025820316,0.0026899928,0.00006381155,0.0004490381,0.00005328262,0.19884281,0.00093151705,0.00036887877,0.27370334,0.019865282,0.5025762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010817698,0.00009820899,0.00054029847,0.00014447042,0.0000685648,0.000035495075,0.00836463,0.0000066623575,0.000019285646,0.007058094,0.9824615,0.00012103101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037792767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057579536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9625962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006454989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010318329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97321576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249927256","doi":"10.3138/jsp.34.1.1","title":"Naomi B. Pascal Retires as Associate Director and Editor-in-Chief of University of Washington Press","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pascal (unit); Editor in chief; Management; Computer science; Economics; Programming language","score_opus":0.04848227509753059,"score_gpt":0.27369959202291033,"score_spread":0.22521731692537975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249927256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94199085,0.0020608974,0.0000073870233,0.008345671,0.0010603993,0.00006804011,0.0000075152493,0.000009633932,0.046449613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967119,0.0010346541,0.00019913499,0.00008174527,0.0009464172,7.247858e-8,3.2556474e-7,0.0000044294643,0.0010213212],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966536,0.0019412342,0.0004031732,0.00012552012,0.0006894151,0.00018706913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99558073,0.0025531277,0.0010205829,0.000087989356,0.0005908933,0.00016665093],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011222321,0.0000790616,0.00032838876,0.00011405905,0.00025295105,0.0014846058,0.00056612777,0.00029225662,0.00017638147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022776784,0.00007371273,0.00012207092,0.00025686764,0.00026012576,0.03074248,0.000104242565,0.0012566594,8.9479005e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021656568,0.0014980673,0.57909745,0.00015396594,0.00057662243,0.00029881505,0.21730687,0.000027566266,0.0028642893,0.071125425,0.078945145,0.045940157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026820437,0.00087113393,0.13142839,0.0005834825,0.00013513713,0.000013764839,0.050739158,0.000033325618,0.00032764138,0.024704043,0.78806895,0.0004129627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002110189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016773942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7091238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009756382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009460405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955195},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4249948412","doi":"10.3138/jsp.36.1.23","title":"Hippo Meets Dissertator on Forked Path in Academic Jungle","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jungle; Luck; History; Art; Archaeology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.07705319775345341,"score_gpt":0.3457157586377258,"score_spread":0.2686625608842724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249948412","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9505439,0.0031345624,0.00006895126,0.035455607,0.0017573555,0.00013583744,0.00000339923,0.000033123128,0.008867273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966758,0.00009994028,0.00042849904,0.001286488,0.00080645597,0.0000052864216,0.0000020869982,0.000041854473,0.0006536168],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970363,0.0002168684,0.0009500111,0.00030479615,0.0008794339,0.0006126202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99804527,0.0002617289,0.000676174,0.0002745918,0.00045341172,0.00028883392],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033791722,0.00024613997,0.0004781808,0.00068105874,0.0001903078,0.0031619815,0.0009802155,0.00046898687,0.00013446982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025686051,0.00020091899,0.00020127483,0.0005502282,0.000058864993,0.022313897,0.00006945938,0.004807107,0.000072731156],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025388305,0.002412978,0.22552793,0.00018080726,0.001279959,0.0036732638,0.48518574,0.00031194175,0.007314216,0.109986365,0.10006468,0.061523277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018011212,0.0018930966,0.52682644,0.0020331803,0.00019003131,0.00042639926,0.35204998,0.00000501279,0.00056435587,0.044656582,0.052168395,0.001175343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015699162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010147502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30129847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039083223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019069776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250022371","doi":"10.3138/jsp.42.3.307","title":"The Ontology of the Scholarly Journal and the Place of Peer Review","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Washington State University; American Council of Learned Societies","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Argument (complex analysis); Scholarly communication; Ontology; Peer review; World Wide Web; Sociology; Protocol (science); Computer science; Public relations; Political science; Epistemology; Publishing; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.5900117260462768,"score_gpt":0.5086279091273846,"score_spread":0.08138381691889218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250022371","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.501019,0.24978478,0.0009405482,0.22137274,0.0035604057,0.00052221934,0.000016428703,0.000004073125,0.022779772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9684786,0.025133388,0.0016779562,0.0016248118,0.00028087595,0.0000019462973,1.1154585e-7,0.000013976558,0.0027883286],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97030175,0.0031479814,0.0029469703,0.00028223926,0.022772823,0.0005482281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8778931,0.019921625,0.007942606,0.0016500921,0.09190711,0.00068551034],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.30130348,0.00014276292,0.0006341894,0.008707571,0.0009080018,0.05334529,0.010325752,0.00017793667,0.00015169385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.595299,0.000049287195,0.0004989155,0.043623913,0.0009050041,0.048272338,0.0014129385,0.0042702025,0.000003944252],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006382672,0.00023656625,0.35013866,0.000087789595,0.00035679873,0.0000363618,0.0034652918,0.0000052300156,0.0008509788,0.028489431,0.3972539,0.21844074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038807585,0.0005893907,0.5829537,0.0010880234,0.00017674628,0.002416728,0.005490758,0.000113673115,0.00057851936,0.09379837,0.3086857,0.00022764064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010233776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002570188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4674596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008660446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008971998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99802697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250127296","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44.3.299","title":"Book Reviews","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Conferences and Exhibitions Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.0515474669460858,"score_gpt":0.3016599628750414,"score_spread":0.25011249592895557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250127296","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016575808,0.047731876,0.0017991514,0.29558033,0.0019313587,0.0005366799,9.537488e-7,0.000041835036,0.63580203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73719794,0.051748745,0.016016662,0.06670148,0.009290362,0.00005064601,0.000004255527,0.00004413993,0.118945785],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983921,0.00022564203,0.00044706874,0.00007841154,0.0006485446,0.00020824636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807656,0.000065081316,0.00043514406,0.00011204614,0.0011016332,0.0002095621],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046100263,0.00005916594,0.00016384404,0.00020638331,0.00036412646,0.033281352,0.0006417629,0.00007059304,0.004758433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035428472,0.00004672996,0.00012556574,0.0003157353,0.00004977073,0.10254054,0.0000716678,0.00061156985,0.00016192529],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.398626e-7,0.000019841138,0.0009545043,0.000005187283,0.000010525974,0.0000030316594,0.0017656778,8.0124187e-7,0.00003327263,0.014686851,0.9004252,0.08209414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010887092,0.00002453629,0.002595641,0.00008693017,0.00001177595,0.0000022609804,0.003115161,0.000003102855,0.0000021491167,0.00439065,0.98960173,0.000057195208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011533223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011991409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7206221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011675811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016549414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250330024","doi":"10.3138/jsp.36.3.166","title":"A Tale of Two Journals: Comment","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"American Sports and Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.0344560445967599,"score_gpt":0.2673420341133495,"score_spread":0.23288598951658962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250330024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51502836,0.017213902,0.00040839202,0.11154419,0.0024242317,0.00017736481,0.00007535232,0.000039101797,0.35308912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98221433,0.000076309545,0.0021860355,0.005959674,0.0045283902,6.0437503e-7,0.0000024775834,0.000018845807,0.005013317],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798363,0.000066538,0.0008734332,0.000090032205,0.0007789315,0.0002074133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965114,0.00006454253,0.0013403113,0.00015414674,0.0017500345,0.00017955236],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020947608,0.00012338335,0.0003466818,0.0003744725,0.00020215489,0.017110702,0.00053660193,0.000052414198,0.0057575502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034586657,0.00008861531,0.00021864177,0.00009786618,0.00012441732,0.05249897,0.00006465904,0.0014120374,0.000004654603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009114557,0.0004406938,0.006063065,0.000033271455,0.0002572234,0.00008018737,0.070432544,0.000111703266,0.00074773165,0.14600877,0.70127183,0.07446181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006690979,0.00013170156,0.0006243271,0.00021729914,0.000039136998,0.00010121536,0.007324269,0.0000145283975,0.00006190106,0.00048988406,0.9902222,0.000104451276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008312339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000038885628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.467186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000074931435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011633888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99515134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250403465","doi":"10.3138/jsp.43.2.137","title":"Peer Review: Fetishes, Fallacies, and Perceptions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Excellence; Creativity; Perception; Quality (philosophy); Peer review; Scholarly communication; Project commissioning; Key (lock); Public relations; Process (computing); Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.10251201359878281,"score_gpt":0.26307413965718984,"score_spread":0.16056212605840703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250403465","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1309271,0.07635483,0.00022550546,0.13860781,0.0022369418,0.00027984421,0.000047453592,0.00014135631,0.65117913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9484359,0.009359971,0.0053163893,0.006319478,0.001482783,0.000007149853,0.000032936205,0.000046547368,0.028998822],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735653,0.00027439,0.0007402493,0.00015463727,0.001241098,0.00023311866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917755,0.00011032929,0.0006304069,0.0003894776,0.0068462132,0.00024806123],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008436768,0.00015176724,0.00030184834,0.00036577895,0.00064069004,0.048878804,0.0012042158,0.00011311647,0.0012310679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010484573,0.00012412363,0.00013916935,0.00012618887,0.000164702,0.15229069,0.00021475981,0.0022604577,0.000014776403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020156273,0.00013061725,0.0074287113,0.000103653954,0.000091923255,0.000015628879,0.05009626,1.2041001e-7,0.00007374277,0.096741475,0.8234267,0.02187102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031208547,0.00010900868,0.016555754,0.0006481929,0.00008573773,0.0001458923,0.007108034,0.0000028145937,0.0000031516267,0.006133851,0.96872073,0.00017473825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003642107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020090546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8175088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000852218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013847348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250419719","doi":"10.3138/jsp.40.4.399","title":"The University of Minnesota Press","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Division (mathematics); Test (biology); Library science; History; Mathematics; Computer science; Biology; Ecology; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.044362291186381776,"score_gpt":0.21930126439460704,"score_spread":0.17493897320822527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250419719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42877096,0.015503043,0.00034365559,0.13768545,0.0021451476,0.00018510116,0.00002437092,0.00007249562,0.41526976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948573,0.0005884619,0.0004837714,0.0002372303,0.0004915016,5.3448442e-8,0.0000022742154,0.0000062153763,0.0033331853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847513,0.00024261912,0.00041861285,0.00007901388,0.00061523786,0.00016937933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960548,0.00029293078,0.00079869636,0.00037057855,0.0023809276,0.00010204611],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041553047,0.00008299318,0.00017161586,0.00013894417,0.00090295664,0.03376117,0.002075555,0.00007768051,0.000053801272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025569608,0.00005964804,0.00014437462,0.00008807799,0.00013901321,0.10760965,0.0000966606,0.0014184822,0.0000024467915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016906892,0.00019584793,0.0009712486,0.00001156276,0.00012247864,0.000022048363,0.035583027,0.000025830423,0.00067047786,0.5664024,0.3215096,0.07431642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040672583,0.00014011616,0.005657027,0.00006983787,0.000032762942,0.000019428564,0.006362457,0.000028263848,0.000035742236,0.0062065315,0.98096293,0.00007816751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018750335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011611543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65945333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012412076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9672419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250447968","doi":"10.3138/jsp.43.2.200","title":"A Comparative Study of the Publication Output of Librarians and Academics in Universities in the South-South Zone of Nigeria","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Workload; Promotion (chess); Publication; Library science; Aside; Commission; State (computer science); Political science; Test (biology); Sociology; Medical education; Public relations; Management; Medicine; Law; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.09272571004449363,"score_gpt":0.2839338386615967,"score_spread":0.19120812861710307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250447968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904891,0.000059574184,0.00003586438,0.0025760073,0.0000868631,0.00016593312,0.000006391647,0.0000018966881,0.0065783616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993726,0.000008953521,0.00023099403,0.00027611456,0.000032897886,5.504084e-7,4.3448574e-7,0.0000014897772,0.00007598094],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794453,0.0005283815,0.0006651211,0.00006076126,0.00068929885,0.00011188032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792045,0.00016216925,0.0012369731,0.000117900054,0.00051858573,0.000043932283],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004600077,0.00005273417,0.00019509543,0.00041286508,0.00012444938,0.0014179094,0.0011276025,0.000080865415,0.000016735232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075413263,0.000032412634,0.000040142782,0.0012591808,0.00021916638,0.14393775,0.00010435784,0.00062750076,1.5231605e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021495453,0.00005851255,0.32246757,0.0000039580864,0.0000069032953,2.3184475e-7,0.6699293,0.000009552875,0.000014611258,0.007253764,0.000106557476,0.00012752261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033439475,0.00007807435,0.38604176,0.000043302305,0.0000045534753,6.965895e-7,0.61246544,0.000019731198,0.000037759124,0.0004951973,0.00045319885,0.000025891059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004965297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000061899555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14251985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030832667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044606524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250689566","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.4.354","title":"The Alchemy of Turning Fiction into Truth","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Archaeological Research and Protection","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Alchemy; Agency (philosophy); Epistemology; History; Philosophy; Art history","score_opus":0.04229780808671238,"score_gpt":0.2484801462773862,"score_spread":0.20618233819067383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250689566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9835683,0.002843375,0.003888313,0.0030513913,0.00045038856,0.00006127114,0.000002134744,0.000009288033,0.006125547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958927,0.0007108772,0.0029240234,0.00006212413,0.00032796856,1.867123e-7,0.0000022318209,0.0000016333786,0.00007822887],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982377,0.00022515525,0.0003818268,0.00008134637,0.00086394214,0.00021000991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978964,0.0008475143,0.00038159176,0.00008812105,0.00061092974,0.00017545035],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003994763,0.000061278486,0.00012368387,0.00014841478,0.0006411718,0.0014831077,0.0005005185,0.00009016228,0.00018467939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011895146,0.000033967928,0.00009406339,0.00034796368,0.00015505048,0.018537406,0.000029432831,0.0013602318,0.0000058895193],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045039225,0.000011969619,0.35411724,0.000015479682,0.000058221547,0.000055242588,0.0015884527,0.0009016787,0.0013930143,0.00022512932,0.0031661058,0.63801706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005023962,0.00091740733,0.93462265,0.000059267604,0.000009153307,0.0004388077,0.0010904706,0.0010586968,0.001762475,0.02224756,0.037185207,0.00010593936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070352165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009876235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63791114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012387773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001411758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250737707","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.2.168","title":"Sinners Well Edited","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; Scholarship; Publishing; Control (management); Eclipse; Media studies; Public relations; Sociology; Management; Political science; Law; Psychology; Economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06864266734115167,"score_gpt":0.23305615482366165,"score_spread":0.16441348748251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250737707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6157473,0.0022265885,0.00016490897,0.030445248,0.004267637,0.000091446746,0.000011267732,0.00012024317,0.34692538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859816,0.00017932238,0.0012805867,0.0018228999,0.0039708703,0.0000015096158,0.00001514523,0.0000300685,0.0067180414],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99726313,0.00026898348,0.0008426001,0.00015406379,0.0011593631,0.00031187455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945874,0.00025817117,0.00088659866,0.00043264026,0.003566895,0.00026826237],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039056109,0.00016755413,0.00030068474,0.00074341556,0.0010257309,0.05807008,0.0018314898,0.000156493,0.0005948656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005213786,0.00013940399,0.00021844385,0.0002303842,0.0002051773,0.22480693,0.00016436291,0.0030660476,0.000056535657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008232946,0.00026161526,0.008449977,0.000016351281,0.00016467943,0.00012635157,0.03696328,0.000031597137,0.0006814063,0.074728936,0.8734541,0.005039393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007373253,0.00012595937,0.004057063,0.00007889764,0.000029396011,0.00026242997,0.0037019209,0.00003181896,0.000052051106,0.002277049,0.98845285,0.00019326695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019206938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000051242707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37023425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015691158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029905525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250884217","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.4.373","title":"Ranking the Management Journals","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Listing (finance); Ranking (information retrieval); Rank (graph theory); Computer science; Work (physics); Information retrieval; Data science; Business; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.03982934758915204,"score_gpt":0.22677740321413783,"score_spread":0.1869480556249858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250884217","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33155337,0.012590697,0.013579759,0.12832907,0.0053669033,0.00064710324,0.0000014972331,0.00018116637,0.50775045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810959,0.0006790413,0.001841933,0.009802047,0.005190265,0.0000024367205,0.0000020524917,0.000031228992,0.0013550655],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99736804,0.000023481603,0.00068307493,0.00014133757,0.0015027383,0.00028133686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970404,0.000071243114,0.001007964,0.00018276485,0.0016750861,0.000022580694],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035335813,0.00016129007,0.00023393748,0.0006752685,0.0011887198,0.02112672,0.001246288,0.000059163027,0.000391511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010719427,0.00010367803,0.00016471485,0.0012814716,0.0000617433,0.079995625,0.0005520701,0.0008283684,0.00006921896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008142057,0.00015383071,0.303447,0.00016026276,0.000890016,0.0005456874,0.0005477001,0.00035926353,0.00011518341,0.14257668,0.53403145,0.017091505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010928984,0.000010064964,0.30218685,0.00017616694,0.00019728899,0.0001273778,0.001270179,0.00007072603,0.000009756932,0.019723795,0.67491823,0.00021669733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024255773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000068607596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64954257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006766945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021817268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97988945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251320174","doi":"10.3138/jsp.37.3.155","title":"The State of Scholarly Journal Publishing: 1981-2000","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Library science; State (computer science); Scholarly communication; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.33444373919936,"score_gpt":0.4665811689385671,"score_spread":0.1321374297392071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251320174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8964039,0.021743089,0.0063054026,0.04776792,0.0048840316,0.00022423283,0.000051802173,0.000021208301,0.02259841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844636,0.0009922826,0.0044904645,0.0005080104,0.0018491471,0.0000015785827,0.0000021262404,0.00004079084,0.007652025],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94940376,0.0017794955,0.00533766,0.0006332983,0.04131675,0.0015290595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8906631,0.013196798,0.007354958,0.0013817713,0.08584669,0.0015566972],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2426471,0.0003150076,0.00079749426,0.05885836,0.001704326,0.7083249,0.016251445,0.00037027118,0.00020023923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4286284,0.00017608967,0.0007863065,0.120495245,0.00038449236,0.4241893,0.0015302089,0.008677665,0.000039827846],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019614608,0.00032562614,0.16621093,0.000007703108,0.00013161024,0.00020985256,0.000468503,0.00055667263,0.0035423567,0.003603014,0.3993083,0.42543927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020120714,0.00053077046,0.24496739,0.00009730576,0.000031593845,0.0009982442,0.0015374713,0.00045444752,0.0010107914,0.18816835,0.5598605,0.00033106454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040050215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000065221684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42510822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007515392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035206825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251332399","doi":"10.3138/jsp.42.3.382","title":"The Sign of Four","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Writing and Publishing","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sign (mathematics); Task (project management); Plan (archaeology); Field (mathematics); Simple (philosophy); Work (physics); Computer science; Mathematics education; Public relations; Psychology; Management; Political science; Epistemology; Engineering; History; Mathematics; Archaeology; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12173760459192227,"score_gpt":0.2297151325891844,"score_spread":0.10797752799726214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251332399","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3122745,0.0042990744,0.0003080946,0.012227709,0.003568123,0.00010867659,0.000013727901,0.00004982142,0.66715026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99371046,0.00007877296,0.0006601387,0.00047225915,0.0025884332,8.369942e-7,5.2714216e-7,0.000018277364,0.0024702866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787736,0.0001665921,0.00082469865,0.00009206446,0.0007762313,0.0002630519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958939,0.00047955534,0.0011482717,0.00017894978,0.002167336,0.00013199149],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007514716,0.00010756289,0.00021840486,0.00020401472,0.00055480475,0.019280413,0.0013737892,0.00011746823,0.00037069028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006435953,0.00006621272,0.00017780611,0.00008524295,0.00018382516,0.06542925,0.00010923435,0.002098648,0.000006039717],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010586178,0.000071648596,0.0071320035,0.00003609424,0.00017672808,0.00003131314,0.07541875,0.000002435209,0.0002442151,0.6632211,0.2093841,0.044175718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056104234,0.0002180738,0.0044164886,0.0002637987,0.00006881496,0.00010893805,0.038047727,0.000014262615,0.0002267055,0.045860596,0.91002893,0.00018461514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022668399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003320141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70064485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003610066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015660143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9817377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251385240","doi":"10.1353/scp.2011.0046","title":"The Scholarly Book Review in the Humanities: An Academic Cinderella?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Digital humanities; Humanities; Sociology; Library science; Media studies; History; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.1708005677963418,"score_gpt":0.2899838984759417,"score_spread":0.11918333067959988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251385240","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042031642,0.5865544,0.000032087853,0.068592615,0.0021860453,0.0006870958,0.000014698157,0.00009820197,0.29980323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7301085,0.091933295,0.0004759345,0.15959117,0.0049755857,0.000071123606,0.000031967338,0.00014145307,0.012670991],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938886,0.00202946,0.0016304778,0.0002394676,0.0016874968,0.00052448007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99371713,0.0007905252,0.0014445337,0.001136957,0.0027635647,0.00014727114],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0295067,0.000266287,0.00039496212,0.00045706102,0.0024656535,0.14642794,0.0072979815,0.00023013353,0.00051721715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009142565,0.00015013182,0.00024028713,0.0003090265,0.00037973994,0.31966966,0.00026025155,0.010240379,0.000026306845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007594327,0.00022397151,0.0021791223,0.000114473245,0.000102857724,0.00003988619,0.13860188,7.978853e-7,0.000031922835,0.31683812,0.5278093,0.013981686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004031746,0.00020547565,0.0040676133,0.0011188814,0.000069328555,0.00010105519,0.020443369,0.0000050242074,0.000004608256,0.010933152,0.96244425,0.0002040573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047172955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006249701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68807685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018100653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042673136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99932706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251534506","doi":"10.3138/jsp.35.2.73","title":"Scholarly Journal Publication: Conflicting Agendas for Scholars, Publishers, and Institutions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Publishing; Scholarly communication; Work (physics); Scientific communication; Public relations; Political science; Process (computing); Sociology; Library science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.6062381390631345,"score_gpt":0.546711326355557,"score_spread":0.05952681270757754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251534506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64610106,0.013468113,0.12935776,0.18851504,0.006558413,0.00075506826,0.00009061757,0.00006642199,0.015087498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9317927,0.00047587865,0.061171737,0.003008095,0.0023394388,0.000010545874,0.000010196834,0.00004408904,0.0011473245],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98076385,0.00045367883,0.0029386806,0.00072159135,0.014094588,0.0010275828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.904658,0.003653709,0.0035126787,0.0008736431,0.084797226,0.0025047408],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13346893,0.00029338713,0.0006514028,0.057742838,0.0024611233,0.6718143,0.006441324,0.0004999654,0.00017042462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5751527,0.00021830117,0.00047313952,0.06891802,0.00028419573,0.51515424,0.00095780194,0.0055652424,0.000025263444],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002443812,0.0007671937,0.19410838,0.00004148018,0.0004570614,0.0002118299,0.002390139,0.00049954886,0.006324133,0.10780525,0.2721273,0.41502333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00480932,0.0005782654,0.067853324,0.000121035824,0.00005290897,0.0026961528,0.0035324167,0.00009265834,0.00034508653,0.06250094,0.8570202,0.000397665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000473017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000102541435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5848929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008403575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039984356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251564386","doi":"10.3138/jsp.34.2.114","title":"A Room With a View","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.04872881735785515,"score_gpt":0.2308181353460078,"score_spread":0.18208931798815267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251564386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3184639,0.009714022,0.0012748752,0.021321766,0.0017309578,0.00019872462,0.000010096602,0.000114353905,0.6471713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99059725,0.000084127365,0.004588615,0.0013534584,0.00059959595,0.0000032326411,0.0000036173228,0.000030233854,0.0027398681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762136,0.00040985743,0.00062144344,0.00014200484,0.00093064446,0.0002746872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954903,0.00019731231,0.00075204653,0.000415383,0.002921112,0.00022384504],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005763594,0.00015804089,0.0002906096,0.0004420303,0.00055113784,0.11511203,0.0011641422,0.00009719327,0.0004738962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00489198,0.000110808374,0.00012706534,0.00020922716,0.000076492026,0.19014463,0.000057147707,0.002418163,0.00001614408],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000779833,0.00028060912,0.0065179113,0.000037233993,0.00023277645,0.000059911825,0.024314398,0.000021786096,0.00023118737,0.8966601,0.057494886,0.014071226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008108204,0.00023188561,0.00077674905,0.00021835873,0.000051311843,0.0002170638,0.0049269237,0.0000046573778,0.000046158097,0.0076473304,0.9848899,0.0001788459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007309156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001550544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.927395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011786617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035867107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251658263","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.3.294","title":"Publication Diversity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Reputation; Citation; Diversity (politics); Library science; Institution; Peer review; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.7229583708939429,"score_gpt":0.5249491752440847,"score_spread":0.1980091956498582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251658263","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9323183,0.0010097842,0.0069847577,0.024001895,0.0011632732,0.00006724493,0.0000071618656,0.000014030246,0.034433562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99301636,0.00017194959,0.0031764032,0.00071481004,0.00035534633,2.8875144e-7,9.0790775e-7,0.000005281979,0.0025586225],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9781549,0.0003139055,0.0011340629,0.0002980637,0.01971783,0.00038125593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94250196,0.0027953032,0.0015761245,0.0006046042,0.051634073,0.00088791456],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07165375,0.00008852355,0.00026731615,0.05868624,0.0010127793,0.09897815,0.006142166,0.00016586659,0.0004996992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.38983092,0.000060151444,0.00023202658,0.11474872,0.000107283886,0.19020168,0.0021591613,0.0015260908,0.0001293652],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015024361,0.000077129254,0.6888892,7.1487943e-7,0.000013471294,0.000052590323,0.00039900106,0.000007329716,0.00024344116,0.0008031909,0.26394552,0.04555335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054167263,0.000121961515,0.8118899,0.0000057396237,0.000004597206,0.00037485283,0.00034246338,0.00015652463,0.00016264146,0.0071533006,0.17914955,0.0000968186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006199709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020756534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31817716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022663064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048380753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251844078","doi":"10.3138/jsp.35.3.159","title":"Striving at the Periphery, Craving for the Centre: The Realm of African Scholarly Communication in the Digital Age","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Wikis in Education and Collaboration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; State (computer science); Domain (mathematical analysis); Digital era; Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science; The Internet; World Wide Web; Law","score_opus":0.0390096997743868,"score_gpt":0.31244885954267976,"score_spread":0.27343915976829297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251844078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5436226,0.0020621764,0.00030161775,0.43197665,0.00062130054,0.00061738124,0.0000117534255,0.0000110334995,0.020775467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997496,0.0002293076,0.000279926,0.0010247198,0.0004989796,0.000012466841,0.0000036778422,0.000009748183,0.00044515784],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971009,0.0007708042,0.0005769692,0.000104387495,0.0012040403,0.00024290268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99501836,0.0021255324,0.0009007781,0.0004716915,0.0014246473,0.000059009253],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014591626,0.00009302962,0.00013225117,0.00009603366,0.0022722692,0.041304033,0.002663125,0.00010237175,0.000022022032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019120563,0.000043896936,0.00012696076,0.0011498521,0.0003240473,0.032908883,0.00013632349,0.0012899364,0.0000011025221],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013578369,0.00041383112,0.03914534,0.000019117528,0.00013986633,0.0000042556617,0.65335196,0.0014588179,0.00080193323,0.18288225,0.02736971,0.09427711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059339555,0.00004997697,0.08852471,0.00014454934,0.00004691157,0.000010290848,0.5085615,0.000016471571,0.000041888918,0.01163514,0.3902718,0.00010334078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011024314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060994714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4538734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053604745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081005716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99902666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252030016","doi":"10.3138/jsp.40.1.1","title":"The University Press in North America: A Brief History","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Management; Quarter (Canadian coin); Subsidy; Media studies; Sociology; Library science; Political science; Economic history; History; Law; Economics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06105525916122998,"score_gpt":0.197709239922414,"score_spread":0.136653980761184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252030016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7891808,0.010144751,0.000058257792,0.012807914,0.0017362776,0.000113394315,0.000010971596,0.000053075648,0.18589455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859597,0.0013536591,0.00023499157,0.0005921471,0.0006004239,6.549789e-7,0.000005569788,0.000014980962,0.011237865],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980946,0.00042593048,0.00046927226,0.000118451266,0.0006507554,0.00024095974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971184,0.00036970264,0.00064687536,0.00037146313,0.0013598282,0.00013373603],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021107602,0.00010793246,0.0001952358,0.00029454185,0.000939719,0.013952022,0.0019493796,0.000069690366,0.000048114587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028551836,0.00008268837,0.00012307064,0.00014860307,0.0003195482,0.11284928,0.00018714817,0.0025882719,0.0000036798278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022766713,0.0002874469,0.03722689,0.000014198008,0.00012389978,0.00027564904,0.11597131,0.00009621374,0.000031181982,0.08003361,0.74842656,0.017285392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046008782,0.000053243868,0.029343957,0.000025344283,0.000010995638,0.00004042166,0.004716644,0.000034005065,7.317565e-7,0.00009060378,0.96512794,0.00009603454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014694008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017327546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21670139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071534625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040397403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252049718","doi":"10.3138/jsp.46.3.297","title":"Book Reviews","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"LYN; History; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.7930948307567358,"score_gpt":0.5851686614161555,"score_spread":0.20792616934058028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252049718","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09651114,0.6182971,0.02361865,0.10347696,0.009544794,0.0004810242,0.00001374992,0.000035504378,0.14802107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6632887,0.029028505,0.0833837,0.06924103,0.01186818,0.000014426902,0.000006090408,0.00014075528,0.14302863],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9763234,0.0007605337,0.0019557488,0.00032042988,0.020165108,0.0004747258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95477957,0.002731729,0.0021704661,0.0008103384,0.03746368,0.0020442056],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.21411593,0.00011985779,0.0005045555,0.053531054,0.00015139492,0.20021614,0.006167255,0.0001713474,0.00059594825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6044497,0.00007068438,0.00030072057,0.10735515,0.00006478688,0.19023277,0.000785425,0.0019131968,0.00040273322],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013633672,0.00004047884,0.02632698,0.0000012793038,0.0000068453905,0.00003451887,0.00013503281,0.0000076031706,0.00011743668,0.00027223854,0.8651038,0.1079402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005201233,0.00018240717,0.0076310607,0.000024746932,0.000005221034,0.00013816627,0.0003901829,0.0000869228,0.00007442163,0.008540619,0.98231894,0.00008716488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017819655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014247803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58926857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027962617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008202026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252346237","doi":"10.3138/jsp.33.1.23","title":"Reviewing Reviewing","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Writing and Publishing","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Process (computing); Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09829742237100396,"score_gpt":0.26546832488835925,"score_spread":0.16717090251735528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252346237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14989166,0.11614786,0.0007949134,0.07078018,0.006096669,0.00025410627,0.000010408442,0.00020321867,0.65582097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.936791,0.0086049205,0.0032040335,0.012757541,0.028479002,0.0000046900846,0.000009988695,0.000097807904,0.010051037],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99659747,0.00027262422,0.0013687814,0.00020711702,0.0011006683,0.00045331853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955203,0.0003339548,0.0012688799,0.00024610804,0.0023448803,0.0002859122],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011742476,0.00020783985,0.00052870513,0.00048812063,0.0006465371,0.05929618,0.0012752556,0.00016725363,0.0010221814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014275906,0.00016589316,0.00033041576,0.0002621406,0.000079533085,0.1585795,0.00014882413,0.0035795912,0.00003710582],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004310016,0.00009699928,0.014188085,0.00032388698,0.00017346007,0.00030205402,0.030960532,0.000018657194,0.00031406785,0.1485843,0.54222524,0.26276958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032882224,0.00004769213,0.00029307813,0.0017790848,0.00006749606,0.00039987385,0.004691949,0.000013147699,0.0000060693606,0.0031001992,0.9890727,0.0001999212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008242502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011944989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7868993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013829966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015575747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252772851","doi":"10.3138/jsp.42.4.476","title":"On the Global Impact of Selected Social-Policy Publishers in More Than 100 Countries","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"World Systems and Global Transformations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Ranking (information retrieval); Globalization; Dependency (UML); Politics; Quality (philosophy); European union; Social science; Political science; Regional science; Economy; Economics; Sociology; International trade; Law; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.053856520349548034,"score_gpt":0.33594057995459103,"score_spread":0.282084059605043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252772851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85623276,0.00012702803,0.000034695942,0.028327733,0.00025698796,0.00016725106,0.000034480927,0.000016474685,0.11480256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990456,0.000020765132,0.000068540045,0.0003283786,0.00044505915,0.0000020358198,0.0000013256802,0.000006641617,0.00008161539],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970393,0.0005139075,0.0007110496,0.00009541074,0.0012461739,0.00039413082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967324,0.0001584802,0.0007097771,0.0001207111,0.002103559,0.0001750379],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005746299,0.00012429812,0.00028668373,0.0003846695,0.0005285006,0.010441825,0.0010603595,0.00019580708,0.0001400197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006214289,0.00008122677,0.00023826903,0.0028405935,0.0002157918,0.053293463,0.000030933847,0.0008928744,0.000002978945],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001482948,0.00019521413,0.39693603,0.000017222928,0.00021303481,0.000012618642,0.09338082,0.00003268928,0.000018050674,0.45874757,0.04918525,0.0011131932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062865287,0.00014440832,0.9457086,0.00015583815,0.000022513914,0.000010980185,0.025108662,0.000005041733,0.000010111528,0.019177623,0.008887727,0.00013988302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046421923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058795055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5487725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010621821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00224976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99058545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252804206","doi":"10.3138/jsp.36.1.1","title":"The Defendant is Charged with Good Editing","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Publishing; Legislative history; Law; Work (physics); Political science; Control (management); Project commissioning; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Management; Engineering","score_opus":0.02373545765110691,"score_gpt":0.20297294789792847,"score_spread":0.17923749024682156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252804206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.534155,0.002577589,0.0027263418,0.12965305,0.0036166513,0.00033517994,0.0000022652519,0.00013261038,0.3268013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98753715,0.000033246055,0.0004462028,0.005454733,0.0059277234,0.0000017460561,0.0000013122451,0.0000305491,0.00056731707],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796486,0.0000147627,0.0005286669,0.00016037283,0.00096709153,0.00036423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967048,0.000084187406,0.00077799713,0.00019478718,0.0021995185,0.000038666873],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028291102,0.00016590908,0.00020586175,0.00028244397,0.0008897746,0.057260744,0.00094369287,0.000085328706,0.00036007233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032475025,0.00008249153,0.00013558033,0.0006610618,0.00005920876,0.10946033,0.00017664958,0.0015247125,0.00006408235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00096846325,0.00045292755,0.02669174,0.00020632871,0.00076131447,0.00032587073,0.0031072611,0.000107753614,0.0063049993,0.06685533,0.7995163,0.09470169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018544062,0.00010688946,0.0037240835,0.00042541052,0.00009393128,0.00013305785,0.0020326918,0.00035713345,0.00088694895,0.011376944,0.9787291,0.0002793931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019877413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000061348685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45338216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000100945734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013000883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9437179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252817249","doi":"10.3138/uu58-w314-1040-6x88","title":"O Tempora! O Mores!","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Linguistics and Education Research","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mores; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.09592880667107923,"score_gpt":0.31474530137631523,"score_spread":0.218816494705236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252817249","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40735626,0.0009558106,0.00039956378,0.013645754,0.0056650764,0.00007360003,0.0000067079172,0.000024455789,0.5718728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98257667,0.000014977856,0.0008297384,0.0008030082,0.008123024,3.016354e-7,0.0000023323287,0.000013589471,0.0076363427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827814,0.000032675733,0.0005187214,0.00007823109,0.00083990104,0.00025230632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954001,0.00019556361,0.00034212775,0.0001246988,0.003694411,0.00024313015],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006503415,0.00007065827,0.00013005397,0.00048441844,0.0003011629,0.03309827,0.00052265736,0.000056129982,0.0011680815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005861159,0.0000543246,0.00008818359,0.00009138158,0.00007503598,0.02130247,0.0000545779,0.0011405215,0.000028667231],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005733251,0.00017826444,0.015503815,0.000027391352,0.000085680316,0.000121941244,0.026899131,0.000003446242,0.00020402286,0.618973,0.3253546,0.012591318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024414418,0.000067854555,0.0041614273,0.000039305003,0.000009455578,0.000022046108,0.009323902,0.0000046930777,0.00007967076,0.008690652,0.97727984,0.00007700267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018398072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008112948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65192527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000079896854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000234179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252866017","doi":"10.3138/jsp.45.2.197","title":"Reviews","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Writing and Publishing","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.06692201879607196,"score_gpt":0.24272687496677875,"score_spread":0.1758048561707068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252866017","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19576754,0.02148973,0.0002939549,0.08607696,0.0049684322,0.00034051688,0.000007634603,0.00011210306,0.6909431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94127285,0.00070416945,0.0035787998,0.012117325,0.020581333,0.000011628996,0.000006317048,0.000055830504,0.021671752],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977816,0.000176174,0.0009653736,0.00012347437,0.00065682083,0.0002965536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99634963,0.00018776096,0.0009735526,0.00016933033,0.002071917,0.0002477798],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053810915,0.00013662974,0.0003342601,0.0003462424,0.00033870814,0.09088117,0.001021749,0.00013371314,0.0035080132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008591615,0.00009848181,0.0002020711,0.0001042544,0.00007501146,0.21353392,0.00009585015,0.0026790064,0.00021434198],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028241038,0.000022452821,0.0012920876,0.000026425401,0.000021280533,0.0000051557704,0.008773476,9.716791e-7,0.00018329664,0.05090608,0.8942553,0.04451069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023064598,0.00004403716,0.0006328455,0.0002447359,0.000019450415,0.000055720368,0.0047087623,0.000010320779,0.000011247111,0.00902193,0.98489416,0.00012613896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027467584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012382593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74550533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006732246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008826103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252885476","doi":"10.3138/jsp.46.2.193","title":"Book Reviews","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.05665069579184208,"score_gpt":0.2504650920330488,"score_spread":0.19381439624120672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252885476","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01980621,0.12341041,0.0019539157,0.09316386,0.0055509275,0.00027772482,0.000008491324,0.00015570698,0.75567275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8359277,0.0053804927,0.0076095895,0.071256496,0.01787126,0.000015828993,0.000035386623,0.00012769674,0.061775528],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972562,0.0006288451,0.0009927726,0.00013699815,0.00073525286,0.00024992597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957729,0.0002769002,0.0011779662,0.00051791314,0.002029184,0.00022515496],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012181949,0.00015008998,0.00037741772,0.00045018713,0.00053063536,0.108114,0.0018556337,0.00011369266,0.0009818892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0142527735,0.00011487021,0.00023822268,0.00011587864,0.000087344495,0.2387898,0.00015358492,0.0024890017,0.00007638929],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012018005,0.000052833235,0.00040479188,0.00001748154,0.000026967567,0.0000019042795,0.0059311036,0.0000022095462,0.0001230557,0.10477098,0.85403407,0.034622587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037248433,0.00010684926,0.00044665107,0.00017632628,0.000030433584,0.000027779772,0.000503962,0.000028689597,0.000015678008,0.004520344,0.993635,0.00013577736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005390288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032870856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8161215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096283744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000093070776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252978911","doi":"10.1353/scp.2007.0013","title":"The Importance of Resubmitting Rejected Papers","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Indigenous; The Renaissance; Politics; Media studies; Sociology; Slavic languages; Social science; History; Classics; Political science; Art history; Law","score_opus":0.017757656599838363,"score_gpt":0.25884655791974137,"score_spread":0.24108890131990302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252978911","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65338665,0.0048391735,0.000041864063,0.018523287,0.0017968226,0.00007874295,0.000002736863,0.000017289341,0.32131344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922513,0.00051146833,0.0006724377,0.00060699205,0.0012736649,2.7061117e-7,3.5355134e-7,0.000010836077,0.004672671],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978478,0.00014732078,0.0006109274,0.0000748388,0.001032929,0.00028620698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969365,0.000514729,0.00095220655,0.00013047713,0.0012337297,0.00023236677],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017496707,0.000045577206,0.00012692998,0.00045131196,0.0015345344,0.015923584,0.00076577393,0.00012209895,0.000061564984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020967115,0.00004189287,0.00012257931,0.00070177595,0.00033094728,0.021030888,0.000032485576,0.0010199333,0.0000013781347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026658335,0.00009941341,0.2732169,0.00003942067,0.00023829904,0.00034676483,0.06613429,0.0000097767215,0.008050868,0.18800987,0.23280704,0.2307808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016613555,0.000020529083,0.07810917,0.00004961312,0.000012922611,0.000008676651,0.013217219,2.430733e-7,0.000021699088,0.0010026877,0.9073381,0.000053036485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02766622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46777758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67453104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071412453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012399334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253204910","doi":"10.3138/jsp.40.4.370","title":"Library Publishing as a New Model of Scholarly Communication","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Diversification (marketing strategy); Subject (documents); Library science; Scholarly communication; Academic library; Political science; Business; Computer science; Marketing; Law","score_opus":0.03225604317048861,"score_gpt":0.23716289479346542,"score_spread":0.2049068516229768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253204910","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3046824,0.011387637,0.086039424,0.49868575,0.00075618515,0.00026080757,0.000009120442,0.0003470469,0.09783163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70654213,0.00026222103,0.27625003,0.015440748,0.00043489086,5.610841e-7,0.0000079152505,0.000022945951,0.0010385363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960106,0.0003291723,0.0012559718,0.0003159078,0.00168944,0.00039893057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99488884,0.00024587946,0.0017047117,0.0011583762,0.001228696,0.000773483],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00341018,0.00023324316,0.0004487612,0.0010403277,0.0002639074,0.2280272,0.010019574,0.0003494297,0.000041184125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034162444,0.00020899324,0.0002548636,0.0016836744,0.0000306511,0.8248206,0.0009710669,0.0034102446,0.0000071546265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014085049,0.0004313051,0.009266258,0.000055697135,0.00015211343,0.000055218912,0.008432725,0.003214989,0.01009007,0.59370446,0.20854329,0.16591302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003736033,0.0010265574,0.030606275,0.0014127955,0.00007858342,0.0004293212,0.001159787,0.05379723,0.006327687,0.8256489,0.07484522,0.00093159446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001059906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002679301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5967934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000598233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020122349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253211765","doi":"10.3138/jsp.33.1.70","title":"Letter to the Editor","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Veterinary Practice and Education Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.24533810275924206,"score_gpt":0.4487331959618689,"score_spread":0.20339509320262683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253211765","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00054373156,0.00057009194,0.00019872667,0.9105589,0.06956445,0.00030608292,0.000015687383,0.000022433222,0.018219942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00007745326,0.00011579328,0.0007753278,0.59864193,0.3821732,0.000026003812,0.000008986161,0.000038619924,0.018142715],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942681,0.0016599871,0.0013849577,0.00025483413,0.0017107992,0.0007213083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99029976,0.0026783785,0.0022440772,0.0005800238,0.0040059714,0.00019177773],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0088489605,0.00027827045,0.000551012,0.0006170547,0.0017387499,0.008763465,0.0017970684,0.0012506621,0.000796897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012918311,0.00016991359,0.00024416408,0.00057242875,0.00003527718,0.044234477,0.00048125317,0.03522945,0.0006705368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002459516,0.000015811624,0.0015880031,0.00007295776,0.00014584218,0.0002211325,0.003299195,0.0000010999084,0.000008882326,0.0000062629656,0.9937923,0.0008239334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027606828,0.00011763319,0.0019809373,0.0005093436,0.000110421344,0.00013221272,0.003111818,2.2515661e-7,1.2387576e-7,0.00010569568,0.99347633,0.00017916746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000105865736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000109937555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31260875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005101318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011030979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253612386","doi":"10.3138/0757-4748-121x-17j1","title":"Many Are Culled But Few Are Chosen: Janson's <i>History of Art</i>, Its Reception, Emulators, Legacy, and Current Demise","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Art History and Market Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Demise; Art history; Art; Performance art; History; Cartography; Geography; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.041273929548305076,"score_gpt":0.23303465265061996,"score_spread":0.19176072310231487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253612386","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86393285,0.07395032,0.00074536784,0.0036847105,0.006569623,0.00025663,0.000043135078,0.00007664884,0.050740723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781315,0.00096819847,0.00024142317,0.00048363212,0.0022599183,0.0000017318579,0.000009843134,0.000037198562,0.017866597],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727917,0.0001775327,0.0010949053,0.0002504994,0.0008687768,0.0003291018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946943,0.00016198284,0.0021129455,0.00023414023,0.0024397303,0.00035689087],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043723322,0.0002426769,0.00060826953,0.00079039176,0.00040863303,0.0037319309,0.00047724135,0.00015236603,0.0009222523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001660438,0.00021692656,0.00033848002,0.00012313675,0.0002066836,0.04054663,0.00010672229,0.0015850391,0.000014445609],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005766272,0.0005476625,0.02348023,0.00048853445,0.00057432934,0.00013966199,0.03680051,0.00001701619,0.0023803958,0.008083979,0.89845175,0.028459284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077315734,0.00006966719,0.0051302286,0.0003969303,0.0002244267,0.00003075474,0.007880125,0.000018110222,0.0000678419,0.00020396904,0.9849651,0.00023968397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033082368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026958334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11419862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052962994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021266562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253695319","doi":"10.3138/jsp.44.2.003","title":"What Makes a Working Paper in Economics Publishable? A Tale from the Scientific Periphery","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Publish or perish; Publication; Field (mathematics); Production (economics); Sociology; Publishing; Regional science; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Social science; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.4652991864906006,"score_gpt":0.4595776696386118,"score_spread":0.005721516851988795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253695319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94410366,0.021302417,0.00018846562,0.021069638,0.009632838,0.00013296351,0.000010503107,0.000007755327,0.0035517619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99358326,0.00082045887,0.0016262069,0.0013712546,0.0014549933,0.0000035505684,0.000003137506,0.00001916564,0.0011179489],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865929,0.0007427283,0.0018551399,0.00055580446,0.009139351,0.0011141123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9791837,0.009860534,0.0016768216,0.001199601,0.0070835585,0.000995822],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14045353,0.00019544935,0.00046434152,0.028969469,0.0006765735,0.5840897,0.007603413,0.00027134508,0.0008092319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15787525,0.00011497687,0.00032035325,0.08418008,0.0002455666,0.4059929,0.0013877321,0.0027068423,0.00006818289],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026955355,0.00014000155,0.71382946,9.818332e-7,0.000024887768,0.0000115170105,0.0018785009,0.00006705685,0.00040324323,0.0006538694,0.04258201,0.24038154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060390896,0.000034824985,0.43465728,0.0000931693,0.00000859497,0.000050947707,0.015190156,0.00042428667,0.00006225181,0.010189876,0.5385044,0.00018027086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015811261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002076434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49592245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047069445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007055516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253767704","doi":"10.3138/jsp.35.1.52","title":"The Twilight of Digitization Is Now","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Digital and Traditional Archives Management","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Digitization; Twilight; Transition (genetics); Computer science; History; Data science; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.02928040481246272,"score_gpt":0.20364461770019765,"score_spread":0.17436421288773493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253767704","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048378978,0.0002923141,0.00024139359,0.009180005,0.000783948,0.00005670776,0.000019349874,0.000007930585,0.9410394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904226,0.00006789338,0.00013373264,0.0006426698,0.00033120965,8.335174e-7,0.0000029138496,0.000007651299,0.00839048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884045,0.00004258258,0.0004048093,0.00006106952,0.00053543685,0.00011563049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862474,0.00014849563,0.00040006224,0.00008996225,0.0006762677,0.00006046007],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077828864,0.00006579119,0.00010343977,0.00012815624,0.00027541493,0.01876764,0.0003392696,0.000011550734,0.00011131049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005537607,0.000039782655,0.00011285325,0.00006059708,0.00010236993,0.03628724,0.000030647596,0.0002976445,0.00000876733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000099430345,0.000059782655,0.00032846877,0.000010970427,0.00006936751,0.000003567325,0.0019060292,0.000006219421,0.000014013557,0.9485779,0.040175505,0.008838276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017548195,0.00006744174,0.0023043524,0.000048554546,0.00001542701,0.000008373874,0.0009045633,0.0000041404865,0.00013477987,0.165219,0.8310702,0.000047689206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000030232306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007769742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94204366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020218096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051546762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.982251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253918875","doi":"10.3138/jsp.40.3.219","title":"Digital Scholarship in the University Tenure and Promotion Process: A Report on the Sixth Scholarly Communication Symposium at Georgetown University Library","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Promotion (chess); Digital scholarship; Scholarly communication; Theme (computing); Publishing; Public relations; Sociology; Work (physics); Process (computing); Political science; Library science; Engineering; Computer science; World Wide Web; Law","score_opus":0.016753262227399365,"score_gpt":0.19945462860767155,"score_spread":0.18270136638027218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253918875","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7237873,0.00018317458,0.00008937169,0.2596545,0.000056779652,0.00015612034,0.0000035733578,0.000044168035,0.016025007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99565655,0.00009239118,0.0008172845,0.0017704936,0.00007767378,1.4558289e-7,0.000008455951,0.0000065423255,0.0015704365],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976907,0.00063367665,0.00033532947,0.00027497092,0.00083976856,0.0002255667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786514,0.0002981001,0.0006280085,0.00067578827,0.00038984438,0.00014309032],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030645088,0.00015339725,0.00017069936,0.00038200914,0.00075986073,0.0395748,0.003569439,0.00016585294,0.0000067902724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006309322,0.00010082982,0.00008357489,0.0013105414,0.00005880527,0.34227356,0.00047114154,0.0023260766,0.0000027204217],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007668359,0.001596928,0.7574689,0.00010737643,0.00016835782,0.0045922343,0.02382346,0.0002414278,0.001536689,0.15938851,0.026769862,0.023539437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011212995,0.0005968509,0.86489654,0.00053534243,0.00003042132,0.0014611175,0.004011718,0.0003583275,0.00021466172,0.013404884,0.11305045,0.0003184072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000068614704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005986429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30269876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000120568264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026311996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253984597","doi":"10.3138/jsp.36.1.27","title":"‘Joy! Rapture! I've Got a Brain!’","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rapture; Wizard; Order (exchange); Wizard of oz; Aesthetics; Sociology; Psychology; Literature; Visual arts; Epistemology; Art; Philosophy; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.04946522916121848,"score_gpt":0.2848902711316998,"score_spread":0.2354250419704813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253984597","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89631414,0.00013157414,0.005105435,0.069135934,0.005792827,0.00015652843,0.000006237581,0.000067083194,0.023290249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96848756,0.000029568191,0.0005253728,0.028904838,0.00082225323,0.0000025359614,5.244754e-7,0.00001863741,0.0012087089],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99732804,0.0002102645,0.00052917236,0.0003224011,0.0012754336,0.00033471175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99753296,0.0003249054,0.0006440203,0.00019551266,0.00096032076,0.00034224964],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019082967,0.00014994384,0.00018757638,0.0006111463,0.0003885701,0.018306462,0.0008680499,0.0001143575,0.00010057541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029557928,0.00012657604,0.00015912302,0.001281291,0.000112995884,0.07115858,0.00008451669,0.0017776535,0.00005380416],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010135003,0.0004041695,0.0013354907,0.000010835686,0.000007803828,0.00014823479,0.001825655,0.0001114068,0.94268733,0.020326704,0.020145286,0.012895753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0066683423,0.0014212965,0.04301304,0.00040623892,0.00006769496,0.004669332,0.004613877,0.000035871715,0.47982335,0.05492888,0.40348905,0.0008630297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009209157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000022170545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46286395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019665153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061986584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9827126},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4254072762","doi":"10.3138/jsp.41.1.3","title":"University Press Forum 2009","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Media studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.04127246306470001,"score_gpt":0.22251899923536986,"score_spread":0.18124653617066985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254072762","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18391185,0.004585377,0.0006447895,0.1144993,0.0022275136,0.00016557846,0.000043825978,0.00017550332,0.69374627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98658824,0.00014207722,0.001087215,0.0017417609,0.001004055,1.0907939e-7,0.000007766452,0.0000113962715,0.009417351],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998178,0.00023780896,0.00046155223,0.00013043216,0.0007141982,0.00027799216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99634975,0.00012345969,0.0006626036,0.00036337227,0.0022863662,0.00021446137],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027404502,0.00012980487,0.00022827637,0.0004234222,0.00062685943,0.0703841,0.0018835792,0.00012867099,0.000098766315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020993373,0.00011631613,0.00017594073,0.00012974165,0.00006319138,0.22762002,0.00010942248,0.00219435,0.000005747554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008961318,0.00019106024,0.00086262927,0.0000055080013,0.000062282976,0.00004149817,0.008138171,0.000018839892,0.00023668885,0.5497385,0.4085028,0.032112386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060966954,0.000196082,0.0026776225,0.00007127484,0.000034202505,0.000034575296,0.0059706583,0.000028862016,0.000026691538,0.00479216,0.9854123,0.00014587937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014777946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004719621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80267644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015074234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014776102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.953348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254428067","doi":"10.3138/jsp.43.2.156","title":"The Importance of Encouraging Librarians to Publish in Peer-Reviewed Publications","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Apprehension; Hostility; Field (mathematics); Resistance (ecology); Advice (programming); Psychology; Public relations; Peer review; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.11676481604646614,"score_gpt":0.2684599176161937,"score_spread":0.15169510156972754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254428067","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31002137,0.0070780343,0.0003703349,0.21810484,0.0026661414,0.0005343919,0.000038294384,0.00010754711,0.46107903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900469,0.00019031757,0.0033451994,0.0015518501,0.0006020819,0.000021019621,0.000012188627,0.00003525101,0.004195157],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99594826,0.00043207098,0.0017251798,0.00021261632,0.0012742506,0.00040760834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906423,0.00048422356,0.001552368,0.00092184305,0.0061128647,0.00028639118],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.015215215,0.00018112702,0.0003865282,0.0010159195,0.00063736195,0.06639942,0.00406269,0.00012200271,0.00032836717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02719012,0.00013041243,0.0002016965,0.0008022178,0.00014797837,0.18892284,0.00037402444,0.002429722,0.000008375562],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005703136,0.00026614347,0.1142781,0.000027294269,0.00009397131,0.000005564398,0.06397605,0.0000057533493,0.00009918679,0.5909041,0.21460058,0.015686229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047778932,0.00011469323,0.061796885,0.00026361042,0.00003309153,0.000023332006,0.014114082,0.000020263155,0.000039591796,0.019826084,0.90307826,0.00021231966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004127798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018021129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6884777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015036251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049427326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254600072","doi":"10.3138/jsp.36.3.173","title":"Review","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.04562930729181491,"score_gpt":0.30133777278968865,"score_spread":0.25570846549787374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254600072","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07699958,0.67397,0.0004381489,0.1715805,0.0012563663,0.0003159552,0.000020250558,0.00016741104,0.075251825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73304135,0.041886248,0.096930414,0.10962155,0.015423959,0.00000782796,0.000014026303,0.00043036012,0.0026442881],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964683,0.00026880248,0.001197166,0.00015528669,0.0015461503,0.00036430953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99413097,0.00012698758,0.0014793208,0.000337462,0.003493756,0.00043149083],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013448839,0.00016329021,0.0004383784,0.00054356974,0.00012895836,0.027476842,0.0014630548,0.00013193299,0.00059172895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020505482,0.00013241083,0.00029179922,0.0009828421,0.000031134095,0.29643485,0.00013875536,0.0031207483,0.0009987159],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001954636,0.00008568461,0.002711017,0.00012888716,0.00006861229,0.000037772512,0.00011041092,0.000021208907,0.0034887244,0.0007162755,0.9314012,0.061210647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065048534,0.000057057496,0.0035204217,0.0036822136,0.0000967861,0.0009769136,0.00005379976,0.0000114610975,0.00021089647,0.00036470176,0.9902208,0.00015446922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007395576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000063233283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65604174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004366174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031142725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254900995","doi":"10.3138/jsp.40.2.201","title":"A Tax on Productivity?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reprint; Productivity; Computer science; Business; Advertising; Economics","score_opus":0.054412107953495624,"score_gpt":0.2509326429972911,"score_spread":0.1965205350437955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254900995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54437155,0.0011513126,0.00009194831,0.15026687,0.0020129273,0.00013528379,0.000011848731,0.00009914797,0.30185914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888937,0.000024298717,0.0006827584,0.0029598756,0.0029656494,0.000001085619,0.0000048672737,0.000015015672,0.004452738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976144,0.00027333962,0.0006174963,0.00017795643,0.001048254,0.00026857245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99607015,0.00016443884,0.0007665441,0.0005034821,0.002304182,0.00019122554],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054603717,0.00015784093,0.00026893386,0.0006591384,0.0005607669,0.1045772,0.0015114781,0.00010995314,0.00015488235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008715551,0.00012533122,0.00017224424,0.00017790415,0.000064876105,0.20015572,0.000062200656,0.00306906,0.000024856245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017073362,0.000673468,0.0008539021,0.000010611993,0.00008514198,0.00003633787,0.021993363,0.00003340884,0.0014430672,0.58229333,0.2579676,0.13443902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007143758,0.00080961315,0.008148024,0.00019517598,0.000032725446,0.000066395565,0.0019333238,0.000014525949,0.00017859296,0.03522975,0.95244163,0.00023586633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000045811877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034409382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69447404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015122992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016892848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255147163","doi":"10.3138/jsp.40.2.129","title":"Slow Writing; or, Getting Off the Book Standard: What Can Journal Editors Do?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Judgement; Sentence; Convention; Quality (philosophy); Productivity; Position (finance); Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Economics","score_opus":0.031303304852890276,"score_gpt":0.253497861170928,"score_spread":0.2221945563180377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255147163","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31293118,0.0802402,0.00027170574,0.5236278,0.030039467,0.00045031265,0.000045992332,0.00022719173,0.052166127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91890377,0.0043242774,0.001464401,0.016955638,0.054073613,0.000003131563,0.00001248986,0.00007349909,0.004189179],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942043,0.0008382036,0.0016353732,0.00023143427,0.0024419127,0.00064881705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99043435,0.0007758992,0.0021787619,0.00064883556,0.0055150697,0.00044707835],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01789861,0.0003185352,0.0005009384,0.0006933367,0.0033422534,0.4231845,0.0034986464,0.0002327466,0.0004968657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01058611,0.00019560299,0.00037952824,0.00028051433,0.00018905538,0.30629292,0.00020508863,0.008016397,0.00000612093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002011926,0.00011662925,0.00056725345,0.000012511926,0.00016517863,0.000112611015,0.06340611,0.000038192054,0.00010759062,0.011233292,0.7387042,0.18533526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009961404,0.00050400425,0.00087603653,0.0008221286,0.000087957174,0.00064412673,0.062880754,0.000023184712,0.000029008152,0.0066105006,0.9262282,0.00029795044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004033588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007015859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6059726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004903231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009263035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99795526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255664352","doi":"10.3138/jsp.43.4.395","title":"The E-book and Spanish Scientific Publishers in Social and Human Sciences","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Status quo; Consolidation (business); Element (criminal law); Library science; Sociology; Electronic publishing; Scientific communication; Subject (documents); Social science; Political science; Public relations; Media studies; Business; Law; The Internet; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.04721139209633815,"score_gpt":0.26245003604984535,"score_spread":0.2152386439535072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255664352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9487788,0.0046870178,0.00019018202,0.016055075,0.0010653961,0.0000675474,2.3177702e-7,0.000022057915,0.029133707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959482,0.000020035714,0.0013125897,0.0005119505,0.00035962323,0.0000011184944,1.563273e-7,0.0000041314906,0.0018421732],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982704,0.00009977481,0.00035365063,0.00016075745,0.0007806182,0.00033482062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990339,0.00019768385,0.00027805936,0.000082591236,0.00022431745,0.00018342871],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059994273,0.00008393818,0.00011658226,0.0005425103,0.0019284822,0.23155044,0.0010822482,0.000062809515,0.0000040536697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082598004,0.00005629195,0.000032964086,0.0012256121,0.0002987371,0.33981898,0.00049001543,0.00053367525,6.0910304e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011049771,0.00007146993,0.6749994,0.000010795351,0.000026052994,0.000008549808,0.006943711,0.0000010708841,0.00036888802,0.1305115,0.14521769,0.041829817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054667116,0.00007398376,0.44720006,0.000037292248,0.0000035907688,0.000104257204,0.001496551,0.00004395505,0.00010989372,0.014452279,0.5357582,0.00017327876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008400308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000069839334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39054048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048105932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021331012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255832254","doi":"10.3138/jsp.35.4.221","title":"Writing Successful Covering Letters for Unsolicited Submissions to Academic Journals: Comment","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Writing and Publishing","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Information retrieval; Library science","score_opus":0.07587751554566512,"score_gpt":0.3083500375624888,"score_spread":0.23247252201682367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255832254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67780644,0.0015404936,0.012157409,0.30050287,0.0018252492,0.00033774902,0.00006897083,0.00010601102,0.0056548133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95311797,0.00008965947,0.0041743927,0.03262536,0.009697805,0.000012195139,0.000010711411,0.000074085285,0.00019781316],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99578315,0.00013366685,0.0017050743,0.0002863466,0.0013090897,0.00078268594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948943,0.00067634444,0.001319131,0.00020474441,0.002178155,0.0007272944],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0083161825,0.00029382113,0.00052955246,0.0011460623,0.0013441547,0.045384903,0.0016758664,0.00027030898,0.00012700389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008365238,0.00026009744,0.00032807016,0.0003236578,0.00007752472,0.07736146,0.00023296135,0.0048404243,0.0000068725267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000415204,0.00027509657,0.017098652,0.00033484228,0.00053643406,0.00013235284,0.108122826,0.009903216,0.03431703,0.20719028,0.594937,0.02673703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031316644,0.00025391654,0.0013735653,0.0036622616,0.00014208628,0.00027278264,0.030500213,0.00006129891,0.0007523091,0.009936336,0.94925153,0.0006620259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021510791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001942886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3543145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005162671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002737054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256179746","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.3.301","title":"Writing a Helpful Referee's Report","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Writing and Publishing","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Work (physics); Engineering","score_opus":0.07876022362078415,"score_gpt":0.25584495989313316,"score_spread":0.177084736272349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256179746","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.695262,0.0020314942,0.00020339501,0.02907176,0.0021298875,0.000073276766,0.000010610718,0.00012666798,0.27109087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9745082,0.0000880359,0.0015966066,0.001835767,0.011655302,0.0000017818419,0.000010211798,0.000043988843,0.010260104],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99607706,0.00017218472,0.0015107195,0.0002489294,0.0015161653,0.00047496552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935894,0.00034148688,0.0015601311,0.00028309703,0.0038977887,0.00032810634],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075429706,0.00020827919,0.00042899343,0.00059053296,0.0010993349,0.032684285,0.0010997637,0.00024014345,0.00051652174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013926912,0.00017760707,0.00026545188,0.00018194408,0.00017666115,0.13115636,0.00016849191,0.004240452,0.000018892038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008183119,0.00016356335,0.04350083,0.000081553626,0.00021273088,0.0056988355,0.04777389,0.000015671874,0.0006281725,0.12979944,0.7589166,0.01312684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006334268,0.00009453295,0.0031785,0.00034325654,0.000039393148,0.010210883,0.012685591,0.000015325284,0.000047708414,0.0029905203,0.969478,0.000282841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018781744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027908805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27924615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014729226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038088334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256254058","doi":"10.3138/jsp.33.2.122","title":"Letter to the Editor","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Veterinary Practice and Education Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.2676454900705807,"score_gpt":0.4373109470343353,"score_spread":0.16966545696375462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256254058","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042846065,0.00079011766,0.000102319864,0.91497296,0.067685306,0.0002998049,0.000018822228,0.00002217322,0.015680026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00013941937,0.00010624496,0.0008299574,0.6207012,0.35818323,0.00002667585,0.0000063490593,0.00004012983,0.019966772],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942718,0.0016541211,0.0013753365,0.0002529661,0.0017542554,0.0006915247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99063617,0.002686686,0.0022283855,0.0005816729,0.0036813407,0.00018577183],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074037514,0.0002774356,0.0005464533,0.00060077175,0.0017271619,0.008770492,0.0017733569,0.0012413771,0.0011882782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01291,0.00016973368,0.00024926258,0.0004860691,0.00003561286,0.043455426,0.00046053092,0.0355737,0.0010237701],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014004804,0.000016912818,0.0012489068,0.00008687149,0.0001434176,0.00014529082,0.004456009,8.723519e-7,0.0000060327347,0.000005502016,0.99313504,0.00074115145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025824187,0.00011915947,0.0020763315,0.0004997216,0.00010915941,0.00008395076,0.0022286586,4.951e-7,1.0813973e-7,0.00006103064,0.99438435,0.00017879109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000587895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000053386166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29427177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047501698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005961472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256309259","doi":"10.3138/jsp.43.3.322","title":"Peer Review As Boundary Work","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Political Science Research and Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Boundary-work; Boundary (topology); Sociology; Work (physics); Directory; Epistemology; Peer production; Knowledge production; Peer review; Production (economics); Social science; Computer science; Knowledge management; Political science; Law; Engineering; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11104638279489132,"score_gpt":0.42544014134597774,"score_spread":0.3143937585510864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256309259","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06920493,0.03677894,0.00006818156,0.5369607,0.0019535047,0.00011512111,0.0000010097111,0.000016957109,0.35490066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9627161,0.0044128736,0.001444218,0.009246722,0.0057620183,0.0000030206356,0.0000017543946,0.000008941966,0.016404327],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942123,0.00045242195,0.00036028045,0.000075627344,0.0038290028,0.0010703477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932914,0.0003245338,0.00025023523,0.00012042404,0.0038736293,0.0021398154],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.053753193,0.00005988256,0.00014931668,0.00015162755,0.00063879543,0.018677948,0.0008734853,0.00010084875,0.0011984596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13854387,0.000046153342,0.000109545006,0.001005904,0.00018914658,0.11553374,0.0000647779,0.001227374,0.00014481694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009443978,0.00012851208,0.07246608,0.00004081414,0.000017766946,0.000005655287,0.006718764,7.623037e-8,0.0000365775,0.04071844,0.76998293,0.10987492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056241224,0.000021015196,0.03640775,0.00036592805,0.00001053858,0.000013804256,0.00227957,3.9254367e-8,0.0000071305994,0.0060138567,0.954765,0.00005909612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006087507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014597144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8935112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000606799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002143627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256351192","doi":"10.3138/jsp.36.2.58","title":"Commas, Christians, and Editors","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Disadvantage; Scholarship; Consistency (knowledge bases); Interpreter; Function (biology); Computer science; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.040221134834814355,"score_gpt":0.22391039453124803,"score_spread":0.18368925969643368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256351192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56756026,0.0059358124,0.000026186455,0.027210755,0.0062118312,0.00009673852,0.000038193433,0.00006296209,0.39285728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96387786,0.00006120318,0.00037601785,0.0018748015,0.027304444,8.0406465e-7,0.0000037454813,0.000022689013,0.006478408],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837565,0.00005353167,0.000555657,0.00011729033,0.0006503585,0.00024749446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808234,0.00012940327,0.00038865174,0.00013238711,0.0010360649,0.00023118118],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016996718,0.00014247173,0.00023896365,0.00029164887,0.00043728255,0.07891563,0.0005316161,0.00008355166,0.00072351133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00093462045,0.00011497754,0.000109874534,0.00004237866,0.0001606809,0.13477474,0.000106237276,0.0013625601,0.000016258706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051715517,0.0001314611,0.0023889884,0.000034004388,0.000103412814,0.000046156292,0.021615753,0.000006211452,0.00003510731,0.32437688,0.59540564,0.05580468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004421717,0.00012769602,0.0009174835,0.00008932759,0.000024789757,0.00006605931,0.0064283917,0.000008149691,0.000012608701,0.0036616803,0.98807865,0.00014301596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000654467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015823878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39631763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007273218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006875624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9220405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256392931","doi":"10.3138/jsp.40.4.420","title":"Characterizing the Top Journals in Strategic Management: Orientation, Style, Originality, and Readability","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Management and Marketing Education","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Readability; Style (visual arts); Audience measurement; Publishing; Management styles; Strategic management; Orientation (vector space); Management; Library science; Sociology; Political science; Business; Public relations; Computer science; Marketing; Social science; Advertising; Art; Qualitative research; Literature; Economics","score_opus":0.035705413218408595,"score_gpt":0.27817606028970776,"score_spread":0.24247064707129917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256392931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9228743,0.00031876928,0.00007261578,0.03713157,0.00060480525,0.00020607443,4.1087145e-7,0.00002090638,0.038770586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99390936,0.00010595338,0.00047376298,0.0039684493,0.0013437938,0.0000022410736,0.000005433748,0.000009906641,0.00018108546],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794054,0.00008384781,0.00076158333,0.00020677874,0.00073586166,0.00027136639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978372,0.0000920917,0.0010348214,0.00022053842,0.00078406156,0.000031279447],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010746035,0.00015227501,0.00021657068,0.0007867979,0.000274548,0.03317255,0.0006143516,0.000072473325,0.000096639546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000900759,0.000111504916,0.00006733348,0.0010435246,0.000030888317,0.0653647,0.00012719867,0.0008743712,0.0000040290256],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027598967,0.0003991649,0.67664385,0.00036790702,0.0001138144,0.00007023975,0.00081104954,0.000016867627,0.0005319323,0.22970338,0.008215595,0.082850195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059031654,0.00001669764,0.898662,0.00024318806,0.00007746093,0.000011116259,0.003987773,0.00007474591,0.0000039341444,0.067015454,0.02915933,0.00015799276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008545984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018306679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22201812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000881319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003353913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96783113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256656617","doi":"10.3138/jsp.38.4.200","title":"The Tripartite Nature of the University Press","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Salt lake; Theme (computing); Publishing; Library science; Sociology; Media studies; History; Environmental ethics; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02828143043952999,"score_gpt":0.22618860861821036,"score_spread":0.19790717817868037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256656617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6978998,0.0076617803,0.00014180594,0.034923963,0.0046042004,0.000177766,0.000020920404,0.000035502882,0.25453427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919291,0.000117336764,0.00012744295,0.00031285326,0.00065894134,9.8973004e-8,9.815831e-7,0.000008906723,0.0068443054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980205,0.0003302285,0.0005092527,0.000081099315,0.000844765,0.00021412689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952329,0.0006733404,0.0010284976,0.0004950882,0.0024746615,0.00009555457],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009905282,0.00008946113,0.00014875615,0.000143928,0.0013106095,0.025536448,0.002894912,0.00016367355,0.000018609475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004232477,0.0000492453,0.00020446493,0.00018332784,0.00023045695,0.06452478,0.00028206114,0.0038123576,7.270062e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020819236,0.000116457006,0.0057501183,0.0000167203,0.0001653207,0.000008829305,0.018256838,0.000015138614,0.00050911296,0.81959146,0.14310288,0.0122589115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037258683,0.000035266217,0.015019113,0.000077589146,0.00003620067,0.000012762694,0.008136473,0.000008032257,0.0002259092,0.0013345024,0.9746782,0.000063334104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016291939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037567105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83157533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011708428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015705163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289778517","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2021-0021","title":"Achieving a Professorship with Proper Academic Merit: Discouraging Questionable Publishing","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Promotion (chess); Incentive; Public relations; Tracking (education); Process (computing); Position (finance); Political science; Business; Sociology; Computer science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.5341701204214397,"score_gpt":0.515821418283463,"score_spread":0.01834870213797679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289778517","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8992071,0.004115651,0.0038125496,0.08192312,0.0017362119,0.00035046914,0.000022097809,0.000041578667,0.008791207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904688,0.00006543429,0.0044683274,0.0012145331,0.0007447962,0.000023044293,0.0000046943833,0.0000414604,0.002968938],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96087575,0.0020501546,0.0021596146,0.0008217046,0.03291799,0.0011747677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97273505,0.004922251,0.0030829848,0.0008753324,0.017230842,0.0011535187],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.17744064,0.00026580956,0.00061447907,0.055080697,0.0021021904,0.250861,0.010402384,0.00021732315,0.00062756124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24481383,0.00016929767,0.0002511935,0.12489645,0.00014662107,0.28831613,0.0033185494,0.011970012,0.000013416232],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033115063,0.00028719514,0.81449765,0.000025800646,0.00011510879,0.00034230138,0.0025032212,0.0031699028,0.0032829691,0.009666554,0.057758495,0.10801963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004921358,0.002030066,0.32431147,0.0005624912,0.0001082381,0.0038419554,0.056629978,0.0033747312,0.00045773794,0.036486793,0.5658622,0.0014130019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017998644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009463046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50810367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096283073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020797974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99919695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289778526","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0010","title":"Gender and the <i>Academy of Management Journal</i>: A Thirty-Year Study","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Gender gap; Library science; Point (geometry); Sociology; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Demographic economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.12261712297789397,"score_gpt":0.30918646425058105,"score_spread":0.1865693412726871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289778526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9030031,0.001756204,0.00011609073,0.030028854,0.0008433314,0.0003743407,0.0000066793045,0.000010771501,0.063860625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99746054,0.000307808,0.00037914372,0.0012180639,0.00027068504,0.0000012848215,1.2011367e-7,0.0000049550517,0.00035737338],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946041,0.0021988526,0.0005486309,0.00011303765,0.0023097799,0.00022556847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982337,0.00020905539,0.00087873056,0.000089013185,0.00042654213,0.00016300946],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03530223,0.000075662065,0.00023639166,0.0002698224,0.0020114926,0.007182625,0.001302064,0.000053573916,0.00021915902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011092641,0.00005487718,0.00014525463,0.0005230578,0.00016128918,0.01890138,0.00061785104,0.0023302573,7.743842e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00072720007,0.000814565,0.23051506,0.000045085144,0.0012139366,0.00011413164,0.38128862,0.00015043048,0.0000288687,0.32995144,0.049180564,0.0059701153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004160967,0.00016202236,0.08971392,0.000015144929,0.00021765861,0.000057724046,0.77633035,0.0000033052072,0.0000025521276,0.040100023,0.08912514,0.00011115733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016970711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006567516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39504176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014641453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015514754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289778528","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2021-0024","title":"<i>The Book Proposal Book: A Guide for Scholarly Authors</i> by Laura Portwood-Stacer","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science","score_opus":0.01474104094428871,"score_gpt":0.25799268417195864,"score_spread":0.24325164322766993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289778528","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011550221,0.1626449,0.0011938427,0.6732086,0.01668918,0.001952774,0.00060231204,0.00020115824,0.13195704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018029308,0.003330845,0.003343993,0.038047902,0.0071170465,0.00018578566,0.000045265704,0.00018470809,0.92971516],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950395,0.0006688029,0.000900194,0.00025651223,0.0024580152,0.0006769493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957745,0.00034091415,0.0010693703,0.0002648415,0.0019103464,0.0006400354],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018020025,0.00014337226,0.000275089,0.00067315385,0.01030013,0.11385092,0.0021121062,0.00018509603,0.00077851914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008789362,0.00014747329,0.00034976902,0.00068705744,0.00034060594,0.102647476,0.00021538288,0.0032438482,0.0000078964],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055648856,0.000047682617,0.00026834785,0.000006858729,0.00005748965,0.000033864228,0.0036713954,0.0000051046377,0.000352275,0.017947247,0.97160935,0.0059447223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060014,0.00015524043,0.00013288177,0.000021893215,0.00005300637,0.000045171106,0.0073015885,0.0000036551696,0.0000075958355,0.0021616223,0.98933417,0.00018303288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026867203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052546527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7977581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003188429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069486313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289778530","doi":"10.3138/jsp.53.3.010","title":"Editorial","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.012862452351634197,"score_gpt":0.25640757685143933,"score_spread":0.24354512449980514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289778530","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000011401755,0.00236607,0.0000033117817,0.0031845872,0.9413783,0.00006767236,0.00013165103,0.000023811384,0.05283321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000056339313,0.001391302,0.00008575218,0.000103108716,0.97696507,0.0000028159081,0.000032219166,0.000037545666,0.021376561],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898919,0.0007077095,0.0007912964,0.00023665318,0.007926057,0.00044642464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917065,0.0010595722,0.0017376541,0.0002488082,0.004630293,0.00061716133],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014826583,0.00015751415,0.00047959224,0.002422348,0.0028131725,0.15307334,0.002824776,0.0015536746,0.003344491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07778924,0.00021060575,0.00043152823,0.000774329,0.00027899147,0.07694588,0.00023007441,0.012259793,0.000023795814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003206218,0.000028439521,0.0000067298897,0.000015149407,0.000061762505,0.00006315121,0.0040330975,0.0000016774219,0.0000018298883,0.0007781397,0.9929177,0.0020602602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004024974,0.000071799215,0.0000037873262,0.00006464737,0.00008457167,0.0000020837913,0.0022835615,3.140263e-8,3.5870745e-8,0.0008505381,0.99603146,0.00020496946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25512612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2358945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07612746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007823486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026017876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289778533","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2021-0023","title":"Predatory Journals in Journalism and Mass Communication: A Case Study of Deceptions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Media Studies and Communication","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Journalism; Publishing; Publish or perish; Publication; Public relations; Government (linguistics); Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.09097649785053674,"score_gpt":0.3604691504595788,"score_spread":0.26949265260904204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289778533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97098017,0.010924747,0.000026894475,0.015839616,0.000226049,0.00017550564,0.0000035829592,0.0000047957983,0.0018186661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959923,0.002687414,0.00096217124,0.00015780049,0.000121098565,0.000011932295,4.1595436e-7,0.0000072122743,0.000059679256],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99502116,0.0025786653,0.0009105132,0.000086375476,0.0012283438,0.00017491759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99654233,0.0005521669,0.0012428078,0.0003020076,0.0011933339,0.00016734934],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017323166,0.00007224734,0.00026209812,0.0005599909,0.0018191548,0.003985719,0.0011149514,0.000060489503,0.00017190687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003312248,0.0000712723,0.00006255541,0.0008386234,0.00010128338,0.019040523,0.00047572344,0.002374851,1.3845577e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007168621,0.0012326211,0.4992328,0.000015488158,0.00020816301,0.0006744822,0.46928298,0.00035952788,0.0002822721,0.0039603263,0.0050943876,0.019585283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014052786,0.0002601463,0.021942277,0.00007597146,0.000047452217,0.000976953,0.9370678,0.000030475834,0.0000012876291,0.0027947696,0.03530204,0.000095550364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026445433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036028146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4772905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028782344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033713054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999267},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4299317727","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.4.323","title":"Authorial Ethics: How Writers Abuse Their Calling","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Carelessness; Biomedicine; Misconduct; Sociology; Scientific misconduct; Psychology; Law; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.11633681026487577,"score_gpt":0.3203336666959573,"score_spread":0.20399685643108154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4299317727","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7669279,0.0015489791,0.008209701,0.19697388,0.007288369,0.00014065862,0.000012080595,0.0000804444,0.018817991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784751,0.0019637283,0.005516609,0.002946198,0.009803354,8.441128e-7,0.0000021319386,0.000019012721,0.0012730125],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954372,0.0012421167,0.00053566234,0.00017581269,0.002128663,0.00048052237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944363,0.001601438,0.0007067397,0.00013639742,0.002676673,0.00044241376],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026309319,0.00014562812,0.0003026761,0.0003523349,0.001871591,0.014939959,0.0014388188,0.001992515,0.00008157698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037241183,0.00012049216,0.00024066359,0.00052134047,0.00030316468,0.079078674,0.000056014076,0.02009512,0.000008210199],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016615095,0.000099197685,0.019605134,0.000024059738,0.0002019438,0.00039741496,0.76021135,0.00005339667,0.0018268322,0.05431543,0.15331599,0.009783125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006916687,0.00008158137,0.0013462491,0.00025208437,0.000032705724,0.00020615998,0.05367833,0.000041066876,0.00021320365,0.009330636,0.93384755,0.0002787852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087827246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016003328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7805315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003032542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013212182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309182808","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0022","title":"Seth J. Schwartz. <i>The Savvy Academic: Publishing in the Social and Health Sciences.</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Library science; Sociology; Data science; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.12980709026857,"score_gpt":0.30753554026231694,"score_spread":0.17772844999374693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309182808","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24046843,0.0053375154,0.0000058541127,0.7513546,0.0004890532,0.00008162344,0.000010288922,0.0000089447685,0.0022437305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97023046,0.0004634254,0.000044612625,0.026248131,0.00229888,0.000008937721,0.000002618435,0.000008935132,0.0006940283],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99641985,0.0006707083,0.00068754517,0.00017948892,0.001655108,0.0003873214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837583,0.00029766507,0.00074107223,0.0000831517,0.00040823867,0.000094032745],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017791608,0.0001262248,0.00030893963,0.00020936964,0.017918924,0.036233883,0.0015657655,0.000057527177,0.00014599036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011982949,0.00006528205,0.00017579348,0.0005756833,0.00033815615,0.037578557,0.00041425202,0.004955289,7.80711e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010514304,0.00004578437,0.0036654845,0.000010779875,0.00005183931,0.000011879728,0.51588655,0.000028330953,0.000005206255,0.08802747,0.38243225,0.009823933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028754346,0.00011822486,0.0018380261,0.00001647004,0.000025505518,0.000033985907,0.1884705,0.00001828118,9.7336695e-8,0.007865845,0.80122733,0.00009819582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021324703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012984459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.729762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011882908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001806408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309182809","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0014","title":"International Engagement or Local Commitment? Investigating the Publication Practices of Chinese Returnee Scholars in the Humanities and Social Sciences","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"International Student and Expatriate Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Globe; Sociology; China; Agency (philosophy); Social science; Public relations; Political science; Media studies; Psychology","score_opus":0.18765917648976485,"score_gpt":0.39680995090328,"score_spread":0.20915077441351512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309182809","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8290759,0.0005278704,0.000012124546,0.1573702,0.0005417176,0.00014117564,0.0000055592095,0.0000053668905,0.012320103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964023,0.00017936088,0.00019880044,0.0024352625,0.00063067296,0.00000995407,0.0000038344365,0.0000043356376,0.00013545236],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949575,0.0018070482,0.0005219005,0.00011854547,0.00243234,0.0001626879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99602073,0.0013855797,0.00167595,0.000062086365,0.0008379523,0.00001772696],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03175655,0.00007806757,0.00012587963,0.00032191718,0.003658303,0.015214173,0.0018181539,0.000044278513,0.00012951171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011131909,0.000044863904,0.00006036503,0.0005483417,0.00052018376,0.02619563,0.00037593857,0.001728181,2.7688765e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088529,0.00020374366,0.105817236,0.000013759337,0.00011832879,0.000009563929,0.7812221,0.00006061814,0.00015520655,0.100718796,0.0051651346,0.0064269886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048613697,0.00012428152,0.033491474,0.000021229422,0.000015078609,0.000015430267,0.7640557,0.00006763606,0.0000041319076,0.004857086,0.19679065,0.00007116399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011787376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080272043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19162552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025135814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036048875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309182812","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0023","title":"Review Policy Moderates the Correlation Between CiteScore and JIF For BMC Journals","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Health and Medical Research Impacts","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statistics; Wilcoxon signed-rank test; Descriptive statistics; Standard deviation; Mann–Whitney U test; Mathematics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.2962315194705809,"score_gpt":0.46239603960080694,"score_spread":0.16616452013022603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309182812","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10127445,0.1461528,0.006093389,0.7444531,0.00029930176,0.0010275914,0.000038281254,0.000013451497,0.0006476733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81733567,0.031479884,0.0033363542,0.14167404,0.005370229,0.00004433097,0.00003396502,0.000051236642,0.00067427644],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99658114,0.0003936678,0.000792867,0.00011668768,0.0015963546,0.00051928865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98818547,0.0029545294,0.0011494375,0.00029909227,0.0028875254,0.004523937],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023354003,0.00009883515,0.00040838312,0.00043698764,0.0006383457,0.0031976672,0.00028120138,0.000078684716,0.00009406503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27005795,0.00005966952,0.00014254835,0.0006605112,0.00004570847,0.01137554,0.00013381371,0.0033894023,7.49761e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050753553,0.000120363424,0.099128775,0.0022885704,0.00018446753,0.000057101697,0.00095794676,0.00005447447,0.0003800234,0.00065971265,0.63848233,0.2571787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049097813,0.0023283784,0.091171324,0.0067128967,0.00036408618,0.0026347584,0.0010702088,0.00082353037,0.000038468144,0.0072133797,0.8825539,0.00017928728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003657909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001456987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71606123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038375394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006330388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309606885","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0021","title":"Predatory and Legitimate Open Access Journals in Language and Linguistics: Where do they Part Ways?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Directory; Listing (finance); Publishing; Scopus; Editorial board; Impact factor; Library science; Scholarly communication; Peer review; Open access journal; Point (geometry); Publication; Computer science; World Wide Web; Political science; Sociology; MEDLINE; Law; Business","score_opus":0.09165161828307501,"score_gpt":0.35340017578915905,"score_spread":0.26174855750608406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309606885","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66282964,0.085303105,0.000007200886,0.005967611,0.0019246931,0.00030190535,0.00017236665,0.00002497789,0.24346848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995229,0.0009607263,0.00017110401,0.0007110235,0.001766633,0.000011024769,0.0000030043395,0.000026771128,0.0011207319],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785906,0.0002448924,0.0006852273,0.00021064749,0.00073622254,0.0002639753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980366,0.00018247575,0.0007654274,0.00019067251,0.0006886933,0.00013612074],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053458787,0.0001599891,0.00043789975,0.00058945455,0.0007984741,0.10149391,0.0015682625,0.00003936468,0.0018750262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033490374,0.00013053328,0.00007418362,0.00011255282,0.000120277284,0.046703964,0.0023585737,0.0016373028,9.417447e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028267616,0.0005263273,0.08599901,0.00025827295,0.0014116445,0.0020224215,0.3799372,0.0003114896,0.00013118934,0.30949903,0.18243246,0.03718825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013574156,0.00014562295,0.0033053684,0.00049940066,0.0001816608,0.00011665972,0.2592126,0.00002498181,0.000009608046,0.016427057,0.71838975,0.0003298622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007085666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014480451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5359573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096036194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011824021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309610977","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0038","title":"The Strategies of ‘Getting It Out the Door’: Personal Finance Lessons Applied to Writing for Scholarly Publishing","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Context (archaeology); Professional writing; Productivity; Process (computing); Sociology; Writing process; Key (lock); Computer science; Public relations; Knowledge management; Management; Political science; Economics; History; Pedagogy; Law","score_opus":0.08286864283005756,"score_gpt":0.2898333202973458,"score_spread":0.20696467746728825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309610977","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35669234,0.009292007,0.0023233988,0.49676552,0.004890399,0.0013382753,0.00037870344,0.00014588994,0.12817346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917987,0.00007044206,0.0016962435,0.0027621887,0.0019924962,0.00012058403,0.000027226839,0.00006328529,0.0014688472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936838,0.0007962339,0.0018108239,0.00038769672,0.0025493817,0.0007720572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877765,0.0032371725,0.0025212953,0.0008127196,0.005450984,0.00020133528],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.033115566,0.0003180801,0.0005085644,0.00057742203,0.008627726,0.36178446,0.006391279,0.00014889591,0.00007757719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017317707,0.00022218112,0.0004285092,0.0005050818,0.0002515892,0.21595952,0.0012944965,0.0071961703,0.0000025516038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028539627,0.0001750462,0.0006266626,0.0000572032,0.00028769768,0.000006124821,0.14919473,0.0010486754,0.002164194,0.66631067,0.12889023,0.050953392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008493775,0.00023173862,0.0008264872,0.00017142652,0.00007489948,0.000029778861,0.28917146,0.00022031047,0.00006662219,0.013043664,0.6950339,0.0002803523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025489414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043870628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65326697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043641787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010076667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99898463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309611560","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0026","title":"Text Recycling and Excessive Attribution: A Pragmatic Perspective","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Cloud Data Security Solutions","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Attribution; Declaration; Perspective (graphical); Commit; Scrutiny; Mindset; Epistemology; Psychology; Public relations; Computer science; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02542831001666439,"score_gpt":0.2714163095071941,"score_spread":0.24598799949052969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309611560","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27269247,0.010588495,0.51331455,0.1964092,0.0030093407,0.00038472336,0.00010887928,0.00014885665,0.0033434874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.956068,0.0000476427,0.042276245,0.0011176404,0.0003866734,0.000008606681,0.0000050577814,0.000011376536,0.00007880554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973504,0.00042560362,0.00052795396,0.0002716612,0.0011565611,0.0002678249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967761,0.00037178592,0.00079012726,0.00036343836,0.0014794848,0.00021908338],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048234425,0.00011407554,0.00022890457,0.00047770154,0.0010047896,0.021429025,0.0018464173,0.00005930953,0.000041995074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005486333,0.000114384704,0.00009504755,0.0011706693,0.000045723704,0.084294446,0.0016270382,0.002457969,0.0000025637044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041645948,0.00038368563,0.0054231198,0.000033964192,0.00022189421,0.00046964997,0.02962562,0.00051906786,0.0016495662,0.9024571,0.041381817,0.017792838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007111485,0.001938132,0.060536154,0.00058440794,0.00024570452,0.020129126,0.069008835,0.03494564,0.00023305159,0.41366437,0.38998505,0.0016180566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006950517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008496149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6833755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071183825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041733196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309612986","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0042","title":"Pejman Habibie and Sally Burgess, eds. <i>Scholarly Publication Trajectories of Early-Career Scholars: Insider Perspectives.</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insider; Sociology; Management; Epistemology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.04956564445994257,"score_gpt":0.23785467240924815,"score_spread":0.18828902794930558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309612986","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9366919,0.018219033,0.00005600112,0.022572996,0.0011810787,0.00029270028,0.00013110116,0.00010929848,0.02074593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994819,0.00036367393,0.0011307913,0.0010408709,0.0010157845,0.000026760164,0.000049517825,0.00007467747,0.001478931],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99349403,0.001123904,0.00166393,0.0004913765,0.0027087003,0.0005180343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860352,0.0004940388,0.0022778783,0.0008994049,0.009898442,0.00039503042],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011571573,0.00036627546,0.0006861187,0.0016777022,0.002051374,0.10634715,0.0027859486,0.00021284162,0.0006412312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011613627,0.00035511912,0.00034011452,0.0007562107,0.00039833173,0.27420625,0.0010075016,0.006768835,0.0000037670607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007051609,0.0015582768,0.16350707,0.0001795779,0.0010862594,0.00004954587,0.23962277,0.000047662415,0.0073996354,0.46620256,0.09552735,0.02411412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030373416,0.0013238149,0.12156152,0.00022711825,0.00029615164,0.0002534905,0.08546346,0.000030061236,0.0001868261,0.0147405015,0.77197194,0.0009078103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008235417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000101906946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6764446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004597993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007762203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309615902","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0060","title":"John Flowerdew and Pejman Habibie. <i>Introducing English for Research Publication Purposes</i>.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.07689557686782189,"score_gpt":0.30099873669233845,"score_spread":0.22410315982451656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309615902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61500734,0.013830845,0.0010950962,0.19435553,0.015871238,0.002021601,0.0006578728,0.00035549988,0.15680495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97295856,0.000048683884,0.002322909,0.0013631509,0.014665095,0.000042066233,0.000088973175,0.000047721824,0.00846285],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99642575,0.0003892918,0.0008171947,0.00033811183,0.001578755,0.00045090343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98608136,0.0005557755,0.0006421039,0.00030263868,0.012175363,0.00024274412],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0125072105,0.0001545579,0.0003427572,0.0009810379,0.0023725736,0.047718216,0.000983997,0.00006627153,0.0012004422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03780033,0.00012613625,0.0002120465,0.00038158175,0.0001387624,0.026785292,0.0004448398,0.0024700689,0.000002970132],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016173602,0.00023364136,0.0012751074,0.00011182021,0.00038541344,0.000033598797,0.11103805,0.000086628665,0.0009179418,0.3162975,0.5559548,0.013503754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006310662,0.00026271486,0.00019744756,0.000034509823,0.00010269222,0.000030841857,0.0367931,0.00016145586,0.000045476034,0.009912988,0.9516487,0.00017897747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032104301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021876013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39569393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032268252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001826809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323772344","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0053","title":"<i>Demystifying Scholarly Metrics: A Practical Guide</i> by Marc W. Vinyard and Jaimie Beth Colvin","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Operations research; Computer science; Management; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.5346945761361885,"score_gpt":0.5485700388656584,"score_spread":0.013875462729469823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323772344","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79185647,0.014187918,0.015914716,0.15651305,0.0034470316,0.00056689366,0.0001798104,0.00015079218,0.017183319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93224406,0.006520209,0.047386102,0.0038246391,0.001328969,0.000012373511,0.000016157996,0.00011323933,0.008554237],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96520627,0.0013237973,0.00297347,0.0010363363,0.028089533,0.0013705977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9398171,0.025476672,0.0024382202,0.0009955637,0.028812401,0.0024600793],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19604474,0.00032668118,0.0008600328,0.086561285,0.00093661336,0.35578883,0.005139792,0.0005569141,0.0002824584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6889595,0.00023956706,0.00035413573,0.22362912,0.00022587796,0.19955179,0.002602941,0.005431149,0.00026475213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053367196,0.00011474115,0.14572042,0.000013550242,0.00007336513,0.000286132,0.00015687181,0.000008964037,0.0050428165,0.0006477623,0.75038064,0.097501375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001894381,0.00054318877,0.064538635,0.000103960454,0.000055542034,0.00062112714,0.0033585231,0.0020495593,0.0006210395,0.014493969,0.9112437,0.00047637508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012625691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006924727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49291477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050859665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012493965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99686337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323772350","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0049","title":"What Can Be Learned about Predatory Journals from a Failed Study? Possible Motivations behind Predatory Journals","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Publishing; Value (mathematics); Grammar; Documentation; Compromise; Public relations; Psychology; Sociology; Internet privacy; Computer science; Social science; Political science; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.62953521345765,"score_gpt":0.5478280282914975,"score_spread":0.0817071851661525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323772350","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9597394,0.0080348,0.00066556345,0.025814287,0.004251598,0.0004516387,0.00020354243,0.00005953562,0.0007796513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98731506,0.00318616,0.0010432081,0.0009504287,0.0015914084,0.000010998026,0.000012197156,0.00006315212,0.0058273952],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9574059,0.0024365005,0.004229961,0.0010643782,0.03347124,0.0013920157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.946077,0.010681242,0.0045458535,0.0015790977,0.034657437,0.0024593882],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.15450838,0.00041983527,0.001150375,0.1055856,0.0015892718,0.44051355,0.009997955,0.00057859335,0.0026389195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32009065,0.00030651334,0.0006763601,0.12845936,0.00017817496,0.23200504,0.0021211545,0.0063811317,0.00014850804],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089726804,0.00056756666,0.8114066,0.0000065481477,0.0003731189,0.0004195255,0.007446118,0.0005256999,0.0039040959,0.00003153453,0.119450256,0.055779204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022656105,0.00043633542,0.91334844,0.00029206031,0.00005695101,0.00006988568,0.042533323,0.0005816566,0.00036745227,0.0097383,0.029946173,0.00036382163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025494196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019103172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20850852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006784449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002418506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999387},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4323772383","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0048","title":"Exploring Networks of Scholar-Led Publishing Initiatives with a Social Network Analysis of the Radical Open Access Collective","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Sociology; Commons; Social network analysis; Public relations; Knowledge management; Political science; Social science; Computer science; Social capital; Law","score_opus":0.13919753769303828,"score_gpt":0.30798286257908597,"score_spread":0.1687853248860477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323772383","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97150964,0.00019901816,0.0023432833,0.006293154,0.001047882,0.00040199715,0.000014742506,0.00006468339,0.018125627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99708647,0.000030667994,0.00047219184,0.00065169466,0.0015924183,0.000021726984,0.000014242429,0.000055343462,0.00007522046],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957258,0.00016976225,0.0013860402,0.00039397224,0.0016930891,0.0006313025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909348,0.00072680815,0.004169445,0.00034543336,0.0037694084,0.000054119362],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009378983,0.00030474513,0.0010579277,0.002309233,0.0009887465,0.11319463,0.0055375597,0.00022136568,0.00004156417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019614784,0.00022406208,0.0004825195,0.024987226,0.00027645426,0.47516546,0.0037319122,0.0030088644,0.0000013963479],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010244829,0.0002574367,0.8795296,0.00022088095,0.0038724162,0.00007805288,0.0018196019,0.04260037,0.00021985969,0.03618402,0.025842654,0.008350647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015175816,0.00005441291,0.97949004,0.0010816507,0.0010308217,0.0000067522883,0.002128584,0.0047198725,0.00006127049,0.0049508275,0.004600216,0.00035794813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036369075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020552248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3619708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026084902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046783523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323772401","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0007","title":"Smoke, Mirrors, and Impact Factor: How Management Scholars Undermine a Managerial Metric","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Metric (unit); Sociology; Public relations; Psychology; Computer science; Management; Political science; Marketing; Business; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.05998995292769651,"score_gpt":0.2739502394638091,"score_spread":0.21396028653611257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323772401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96485037,0.0014815154,0.00047780722,0.019031797,0.0013953608,0.00035331614,0.0000090889835,0.00021136721,0.012189404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99498534,0.0005378064,0.0007543256,0.0011348084,0.0014599055,0.0000037122513,0.000028734725,0.000053316224,0.0010420516],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972534,0.000031847143,0.00054018706,0.00031180063,0.0013908896,0.000471879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978643,0.00009930415,0.0007950101,0.00020512383,0.0009694728,0.000066769324],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023940569,0.00029696256,0.00040697018,0.0032769993,0.000518098,0.042957425,0.00080196525,0.00012382129,0.00023106764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017709157,0.00024303143,0.00016269239,0.0044356477,0.00004835568,0.08572452,0.0010566321,0.0007388267,0.000050963543],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001262961,0.00015882103,0.6714057,0.00070979015,0.0016945648,0.00065612583,0.00018697456,0.00007138359,0.00032311902,0.030445537,0.20997818,0.08424351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001581398,0.00003788896,0.852439,0.00011470613,0.00023040228,0.000014000671,0.0011319753,0.00022287983,0.000005981377,0.0060796114,0.13780695,0.00033523413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012716903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023559578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18103327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001413693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023568979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9910534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323772420","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0028","title":"<i>Academia Letters</i>: Examination of an ‘Experimental’ Academia.edu Publishing Model","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Trustworthiness; Scholarly communication; Public relations; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Law; Internet privacy","score_opus":0.1432524128185395,"score_gpt":0.3985733770439685,"score_spread":0.255320964225429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323772420","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9529666,0.0006927875,0.0030863762,0.034902483,0.0015416384,0.00019461634,0.000043228632,0.00012223296,0.0064500594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98813474,0.00005503414,0.0046724277,0.0046169534,0.0015236675,0.00000726663,0.000031214044,0.000066580484,0.00089212926],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9800035,0.0015358091,0.004213318,0.0009589429,0.012304832,0.000983633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858265,0.0024110451,0.0048260437,0.000927373,0.0050540296,0.00095499324],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.094649956,0.00041677032,0.0010226629,0.004150972,0.00055126287,0.1235711,0.013164668,0.002727248,0.00011910647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11511511,0.00033630896,0.0004305415,0.0064324504,0.00021293825,0.54934824,0.0016178602,0.01748342,0.00003801925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020258856,0.00027812328,0.028803231,0.000038552193,0.00014802271,0.000092008006,0.014154029,0.035186592,0.1592917,0.0073482827,0.63501966,0.11943722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011161418,0.0009916621,0.3359097,0.0016394123,0.0003391378,0.0008116671,0.071302466,0.28970262,0.0978089,0.08975008,0.097231455,0.0033515075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006797177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004374095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5377882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004130591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006752226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990886},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4323772433","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0016","title":"Open Citations as a Tool for Bibliometric Verification and Transparency and for Correcting Erroneous References","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Transparency (behavior); Computer science; Data science; Information retrieval; Accounting; Library science; Business; Computer security","score_opus":0.7417604793083047,"score_gpt":0.5951478137790643,"score_spread":0.14661266552924035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323772433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9597247,0.00196136,0.026379656,0.009573387,0.0008476805,0.00066217984,0.00007825342,0.000016279953,0.0007564967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843056,0.0008800079,0.013566401,0.00013462716,0.00015621705,0.00003703025,0.000008161693,0.000013092471,0.0008988336],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937095,0.00017400294,0.001144408,0.0004768919,0.004083485,0.00041173483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96623194,0.01827102,0.001099538,0.0003043306,0.013651261,0.0004418862],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06980826,0.00011463828,0.00034807855,0.27052978,0.00076714664,0.15816468,0.0027168838,0.00015226494,0.000026980757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36868048,0.000084337655,0.00010379255,0.4118165,0.000064388674,0.05677462,0.00041550474,0.00053440715,0.0000051499524],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012250603,0.00005481237,0.08581823,0.000028883705,0.00003699858,0.0000050343956,0.0008132687,0.00003060732,0.0011904356,0.0017935779,0.031465966,0.8786397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034513236,0.001892024,0.768104,0.00012914347,0.000062433384,0.0002213395,0.010245174,0.007789266,0.0003778306,0.13243236,0.074896954,0.0003981182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007787593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016366419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87824154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006850641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042593488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95782816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323772434","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0005","title":"Predatory Journals: Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Literature Published between 2012 and 2021","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scientometrics; Reading (process); Library science; Bibliometrics; Web of science; Citation; Computer science; MEDLINE; Political science","score_opus":0.6089117459446791,"score_gpt":0.6088191351660769,"score_spread":0.00009261077860223121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323772434","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96544313,0.021889165,0.0020513867,0.009149059,0.00033626653,0.00009691887,0.0002787534,0.0000070943333,0.00074822933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922251,0.0024874492,0.004136913,0.000084311556,0.00021795335,0.0000012642809,0.000013933608,0.000013560921,0.0008194925],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9824564,0.0019468672,0.0022546507,0.0005618615,0.012253654,0.0005265748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9411232,0.022673246,0.0029750308,0.0005321527,0.03162028,0.0010761179],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.16809201,0.00018928053,0.0010636249,0.15577306,0.00030554758,0.13369428,0.0023455094,0.0003275903,0.0002832406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.34448007,0.00012602372,0.000357857,0.29119432,0.00025353231,0.14431529,0.00100241,0.0023141743,0.0000061048445],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083142106,0.000078588964,0.8415176,0.000028369928,0.0018988231,0.00007024793,0.0252122,0.00005476248,0.0011619631,0.0023947807,0.05962351,0.06787599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068177044,0.000312859,0.93930817,0.00012406739,0.00025338362,0.000018544337,0.028134068,0.00086107745,0.00006750704,0.022944875,0.007115529,0.0001781629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003490433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011449256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17638807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000084306914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033848576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323777400","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0057","title":"<i>Writing on the Job: Best Practices for Communicating in the Digital Age</i> by Martha B. Coven; <i>Writing with Sweet Clarity</i> by John E. Eck; <i>Write for Your Life</i> by Anna Quindlen; <i>Write for Your Life: A Guide to Clear and Purposeful Writing (and Presentations)</i> by Charles Wheelan","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Digital Communication and Language","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Sociology; Aesthetics; Psychology; Art; Biology","score_opus":0.07364002727239335,"score_gpt":0.3316744369613051,"score_spread":0.2580344096889118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323777400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67264086,0.01899435,0.023037223,0.2632821,0.00022018922,0.0052128676,0.0027937011,0.00030677678,0.013511921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9565898,0.0007710473,0.017582383,0.023297684,0.00033271313,0.0004148017,0.00031674313,0.00012963114,0.00056520157],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951822,0.0005578599,0.0015689606,0.00060023373,0.0011315551,0.0009591747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878361,0.0077017928,0.0020539935,0.0009548718,0.0009255971,0.00052761333],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0115274945,0.00044773676,0.00058304047,0.0003095068,0.0016866759,0.057079107,0.0037229324,0.00022091526,8.809108e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01585229,0.00033983757,0.00019307173,0.0011034204,0.00016046264,0.039533664,0.00095085794,0.0019188556,0.0000017662119],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00072279375,0.0009421007,0.021065515,0.0004573371,0.0003781323,0.000021539809,0.016603073,0.000057287518,0.009942663,0.014717519,0.8738818,0.061210208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045433557,0.0015972594,0.00064333796,0.001283963,0.00010122968,0.00019724466,0.07789506,0.0031726009,0.00045823364,0.00054823596,0.9086561,0.0009033723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020107714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007037232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2839489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000720016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017563673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323783370","doi":"10.3138/jsp.54.1.01","title":"Editorial","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.023298058171022748,"score_gpt":0.2896402503120919,"score_spread":0.26634219214106913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323783370","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000052040432,0.00084178837,0.00001969109,0.0009849205,0.9942886,0.00015395938,0.0008187367,0.00033290958,0.0025073315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000010992447,0.00022104288,0.0007230091,0.000032611955,0.9957123,0.0000061789137,0.00029975286,0.00081034965,0.0021838013],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97495437,0.0008263608,0.0031411373,0.000708672,0.019124659,0.0012447834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9436323,0.008761196,0.008597136,0.0011330992,0.03657216,0.0013041155],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.036489297,0.00082449376,0.0017680405,0.0036637443,0.00039106826,0.18958221,0.0065541174,0.006420951,0.000117838594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.45823964,0.0007542128,0.0011336176,0.0025599508,0.00011908415,0.24942887,0.0009951193,0.039530795,0.0024530091],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003518749,0.00008634872,0.000034641696,0.000088912515,0.00056898,0.00029096904,0.00022098424,0.000020200907,0.0003575505,0.00003626239,0.99733883,0.0006044525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024993557,0.00030703575,0.000023292832,0.0011600179,0.00040476088,0.000021639613,0.00019051859,0.0000020162329,0.000011527375,0.0013785614,0.9933394,0.0006618615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020570126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000043424778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42175037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023505692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006859392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323783977","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0035","title":"Quid Pro Quo Authorship: Characteristics and Implications","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Status quo; Terminology; Political science; Linguistics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07165548441303417,"score_gpt":0.33976078223748346,"score_spread":0.2681052978244493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323783977","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77879214,0.0003606675,0.00061164325,0.20376672,0.0011116626,0.00012489341,0.000025545834,0.00008696258,0.015119747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941436,0.0006754071,0.0009520899,0.0009069865,0.001731628,0.0000023504997,0.0000065662516,0.0000106121415,0.0015707328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980855,0.00033165465,0.00045233924,0.00011830463,0.00070853677,0.0003036399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740905,0.00050171843,0.00045535935,0.00009498763,0.0012199057,0.0003190096],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0139434645,0.00007603199,0.00017157306,0.0003350149,0.00077295996,0.012559021,0.0006388986,0.0006540762,0.000047728085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025330113,0.000068514244,0.00006396824,0.0007518005,0.000099862875,0.03396623,0.000090068985,0.0042605796,0.000021267253],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004581853,0.00006137126,0.20438425,0.000042905558,0.000104093066,0.000051937717,0.08206606,0.0000021966387,0.0031067415,0.41580442,0.21528257,0.07904761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002317101,0.000050483548,0.27339467,0.00013094243,0.000039595576,0.00005303597,0.010511307,0.000028066588,0.000029790648,0.06283989,0.6525155,0.00017505519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027541953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007104619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43723288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010679042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004389143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367322153","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0043","title":"Reflection on ResearchGate’s Terminating ResearchGate Score, and Interest Score, as Social Media Altmetrics and Academic Evaluation Tools","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Social Media in Health Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Metric (unit); Reputation; Computer science; Social media; F1 score; Weighting; Ranking (information retrieval); Remuneration; Reflection (computer programming); Sociology; Psychology; Information retrieval; Data science; World Wide Web; Business; Marketing; Artificial intelligence; Social science; Medicine; Finance","score_opus":0.7096541819502548,"score_gpt":0.5536927636685833,"score_spread":0.15596141828167143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367322153","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95161045,0.00056787883,0.0000051080315,0.041549325,0.0032102934,0.0006442164,0.000004591844,0.000049154132,0.002359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99234974,0.002180387,0.00024380551,0.0002636138,0.004802327,0.000065344626,0.000010884652,0.000028605707,0.00005526098],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99183035,0.0023856459,0.0008004194,0.00032457316,0.004000751,0.00065825623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983281,0.011012933,0.00086187094,0.00012221465,0.004106898,0.0006150536],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.056828808,0.00013748065,0.0002764353,0.002494691,0.0017859667,0.012227685,0.00057844125,0.00050745805,0.000034931127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.44328305,0.0001371918,0.00005633342,0.0039707436,0.00035102735,0.034711663,0.00019016328,0.0040768515,0.00001452542],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001487201,0.000037994963,0.054068353,0.000080486025,0.000028416176,0.000018868786,0.06922568,0.00000228728,0.00095752906,0.0075309095,0.008515616,0.85938513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014801815,0.00048294084,0.8721478,0.0010051772,0.00006256093,0.00002684934,0.056887366,0.00016622627,0.00029488688,0.05799782,0.009136031,0.00031215878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008275385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005231944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.859073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012683047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020206901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951357},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4367322216","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0066","title":"Who is Publishing in Biomedical Predatory Journals? A Study on Chinese Scholars","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Publishing; Misconduct; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.5387497138985565,"score_gpt":0.5629177425169369,"score_spread":0.02416802861838041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367322216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9622217,0.0010842714,0.00018825018,0.030107241,0.0023754511,0.0003104643,0.000041858322,0.000039820923,0.0036309436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957267,0.00023774352,0.00032111272,0.0014989092,0.0010114078,0.0000056420467,0.0000022468023,0.000039637474,0.0011565909],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9436076,0.0020527872,0.0040545696,0.001110475,0.047687076,0.0014874911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9649983,0.009916127,0.00245083,0.0013677373,0.019077055,0.0021899445],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.27564022,0.0003575288,0.0010303566,0.215598,0.0005998862,0.41802508,0.011789939,0.0005984516,0.0005024198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6091589,0.00023265283,0.00048532564,0.33289507,0.00014354134,0.26619807,0.0023719463,0.010185017,0.00030350714],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008474617,0.00069341104,0.7460919,0.0000051804213,0.00006145326,0.00078621146,0.0021434047,0.000050495208,0.00039131084,0.000043655902,0.19635178,0.053296465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026800565,0.000826095,0.93627834,0.00016793041,0.000008700473,0.00010859203,0.007101155,0.00078460324,0.000022015472,0.008076262,0.043694712,0.000251548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008155908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018205597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33351862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066279684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012323802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99355674},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4367322222","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0040","title":"Early-Career Researchers in China during the Pandemic: Qualitative Evidence from a Longitudinal Study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Conferences and Exhibitions Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Worry; Pandemic; Longitudinal study; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Productivity; Qualitative research; Psychology; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Economic growth; Social science; Anxiety; Medicine","score_opus":0.3951777449016108,"score_gpt":0.4514153769848574,"score_spread":0.056237632083246614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367322222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9777496,0.0003396236,0.00004583157,0.0199525,0.00025021072,0.00026003798,0.0000036485067,0.000028473842,0.0013701024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99834085,0.0003682746,0.000090699476,0.000035249617,0.00043379178,0.000012078957,6.361453e-7,0.000008094744,0.0007103495],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947007,0.001982632,0.00054320856,0.00022229592,0.0021161782,0.0004350294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99718493,0.001327946,0.00033724948,0.00020407783,0.00077447604,0.00017134099],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026923064,0.000097785625,0.00020466343,0.0005581724,0.000779436,0.018830325,0.0013639585,0.00007996649,0.00013920598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015639119,0.000070197355,0.000103687926,0.0020506228,0.00013777164,0.037148654,0.00037517122,0.0018087836,0.000017507313],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044832163,0.00004646569,0.71056813,0.0000040222576,0.000056664136,0.00007907139,0.28552142,0.000041608215,0.000031919208,0.0004045582,0.0007406328,0.0024607019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029924195,0.000062968014,0.6951451,0.00018787231,0.0000127592875,5.8937724e-7,0.30049995,0.000009911137,5.665577e-7,0.0031803648,0.00054067804,0.000060035512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04221855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020634912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021583641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042467765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003336636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99723595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367322283","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0045","title":"Review of Research on Predatory Scientific Publications from Scopus Database between 2012 and 2022","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Publishing; Web of science; The Internet; Library science; Bibliometrics; Scientific communication; Political science; Publication; Social science; Public relations; Sociology; MEDLINE; World Wide Web; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.8131554118121708,"score_gpt":0.6284540156426669,"score_spread":0.18470139616950387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367322283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82970214,0.12261345,0.00038691668,0.03970241,0.0018134635,0.0004755277,0.0011600469,0.000032695563,0.004113359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8924759,0.08145828,0.0058094426,0.0014493926,0.0024634057,0.000030685795,0.00035566886,0.000085287145,0.015871922],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96736133,0.0017272163,0.0020617861,0.00081757066,0.027283734,0.0007483803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92037183,0.02567669,0.0018424457,0.0022303408,0.0483283,0.0015504104],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2889777,0.00012988143,0.0005204008,0.11199444,0.00077597064,0.091092095,0.0061916374,0.00017082531,0.0007306776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.418771,0.000091831316,0.00017066121,0.2670218,0.00045937783,0.087587625,0.0023403186,0.0030186127,0.00017513531],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011099965,0.00007859224,0.107193165,0.00012809737,0.000030418632,0.000010234712,0.00007959977,0.0000014188212,0.0013939362,0.0007622455,0.82396597,0.06634523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054567715,0.00023546926,0.33763957,0.0027957577,0.000020060128,0.000011377874,0.0008889805,0.000104141014,0.000506813,0.012062686,0.64502907,0.00016040476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008387679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007809266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23044641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017391748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012830767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99928147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367322313","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0034","title":"Evaluating the Factors Affecting Scholarly Communication of Journal Articles on Social and News Media: An Altmetric Study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Social Media in Health Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social media; Turkish; Computer science; Population; World Wide Web; Sociology; Demography; Linguistics","score_opus":0.5181916922783131,"score_gpt":0.5113537663758196,"score_spread":0.006837925902493436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367322313","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9798433,0.00053668517,0.00000794885,0.016348572,0.0025631185,0.00054189534,0.0000015857905,0.000032369022,0.00012452243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99668616,0.00027082852,0.00073894474,0.00012365326,0.002141534,0.000010193063,0.0000015532148,0.000021639167,0.000005486004],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899875,0.0054170107,0.001070525,0.00017012481,0.0029320843,0.0004227488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98200536,0.0120799225,0.002152196,0.0002334718,0.003159035,0.0003700244],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.050205693,0.00013544458,0.00033928177,0.001108886,0.003572614,0.020191874,0.0012257006,0.00021703469,0.000018092067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21129028,0.00010285556,0.00010702815,0.0033384378,0.00020134423,0.053852372,0.0001275197,0.0032233945,0.0000019632155],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038150974,0.0001847969,0.4713954,0.000009304928,0.000046654004,0.000002243569,0.3866709,0.000015929425,0.00025125488,0.00031050562,0.00034838097,0.14072648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043970183,0.00039802457,0.615698,0.00006415083,0.000051292085,0.0000036865047,0.38152164,0.000011956524,0.000021690083,0.0015587305,0.00016500971,0.000066150475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034730255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014606109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16108459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047418647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010435713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367322989","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0039","title":"Exploring the Process and Strategies of Chinese–English Abstract Writing Using Machine Translation Tools","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Machine translation; Computer science; Think aloud protocol; Quality (philosophy); Session (web analytics); Process (computing); Writing process; Mathematics education; Academic writing; Psychology; Natural language processing; World Wide Web; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.10197991004231756,"score_gpt":0.3235418565291722,"score_spread":0.22156194648685468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367322989","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9613824,0.0035775488,0.03270034,0.0015011244,0.00031961917,0.00009236764,0.0000029903313,0.00018097626,0.00024263638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92361504,0.0000721632,0.07597815,0.000038491813,0.0002782139,0.0000020690775,0.0000011132798,0.000013107922,0.0000016587038],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801487,0.00007553415,0.00066661584,0.00017880877,0.0008344836,0.000229677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972313,0.00043169677,0.00072282436,0.00020334752,0.0013352457,0.00007556109],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004422308,0.00014237204,0.0002400491,0.00049201277,0.00025106332,0.024998244,0.0013536821,0.00007686925,0.0000012226227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027844138,0.00009387306,0.00007847366,0.0014656277,0.000043728625,0.18316762,0.00016915082,0.0013282648,1.2135726e-7],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006431946,0.00008945421,0.03039702,0.00090622855,0.00016193763,0.00019449754,0.052828223,0.0023910855,0.102335796,0.016970947,0.000080554324,0.79357994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004313297,0.00077624904,0.3036264,0.007401467,0.0002153857,0.001781237,0.045148995,0.17159265,0.055756416,0.40652162,0.0006609333,0.0022053628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003520227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005358875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79137456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035468984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017656495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9760139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367322993","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0019","title":"Publishing Nationally or Internationally in the Humanities and Social Sciences: What Do Journal Websites Say about the Divide?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Wikis in Education and Collaboration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Context (archaeology); Solidarity; Publication; Social science; Sociology; Political science; Dimension (graph theory); Politics; Aside; Media studies; Public relations; Library science; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.10958466393479259,"score_gpt":0.3623320687000943,"score_spread":0.2527474047653017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367322993","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3743069,0.0021348307,0.00008523459,0.602317,0.0031476696,0.00018507609,0.0000053342583,0.00002656117,0.017791456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.972143,0.0020351813,0.00034999906,0.017170522,0.0057336437,0.000010938867,0.00000593384,0.000013431015,0.0025373744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946722,0.0011339348,0.0006945951,0.00015224902,0.0030241776,0.00032287955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937893,0.0020641875,0.00089588325,0.00008347586,0.0031170784,0.000050083006],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0353138,0.000111659596,0.00015394471,0.0008883263,0.004662211,0.34020874,0.0021833156,0.00014386374,0.0001820962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021134779,0.00006479284,0.00008432281,0.002303692,0.0005501516,0.18512022,0.00013435204,0.0017119014,0.000006125692],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040051098,0.00008558662,0.02338254,0.0000116953415,0.00006250358,0.000026727437,0.29338044,0.00009631603,0.00004048286,0.38646474,0.26273313,0.033675794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035703153,0.000043637523,0.0728303,0.00018204053,0.000014391561,0.00005822051,0.36773217,0.000024936156,0.0000014431156,0.038224556,0.5204279,0.0001033797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000117552736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002371466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5978361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000315708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026619008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367323097","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0003","title":"<i>Integrating Technology in English Language Arts Teacher Education</i> by Donna L. Pasternak","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Education, Innovation and Language Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The arts; English language; Language arts; Sociology; Linguistics; Arts in education; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Psychology; Visual arts; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02122005409247961,"score_gpt":0.33443967959648196,"score_spread":0.31321962550400234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367323097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8626165,0.001919122,0.00004259943,0.06574549,0.0020674777,0.000107929525,0.000002632914,0.00012325731,0.067375034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874098,0.00014712776,0.0012221407,0.0012986417,0.0016482507,0.000012174168,0.00000958653,0.000016433807,0.008235861],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998165,0.00018015933,0.00055726245,0.00015213738,0.00063894445,0.00030651258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978249,0.00016313943,0.00047950743,0.00013542688,0.001298494,0.00009852689],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055377213,0.0001002707,0.00018617047,0.0011098717,0.00034588188,0.0056412327,0.0006177091,0.00018801553,0.0002845467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02284415,0.000091706956,0.000053617605,0.0029994925,0.00009989406,0.018903816,0.00006774478,0.0013316876,0.000005977208],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058038536,0.00019513175,0.26257116,0.00001207355,0.000029447328,0.000014751502,0.23988722,0.0000014173319,0.0022824202,0.017507002,0.3964602,0.081033364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022556903,0.000016922257,0.008666375,0.00012992743,0.0000059369877,0.000003697794,0.64200324,0.0000016380918,0.0001061855,0.0014313909,0.34730497,0.00010416995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016481981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024353724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.402116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023352966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006039364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367608722","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0004","title":"You Might Have to Refute, but Unfortunately the Path to Doing So May Not Be So Clear: A Case Study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Psychology; Positive economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.0833979768025776,"score_gpt":0.34146546337936934,"score_spread":0.25806748657679174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367608722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86644506,0.00013176711,0.000055516026,0.12471819,0.0015025367,0.00049907435,0.000018261582,0.00007630888,0.0065533076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775726,0.00003181751,0.0006300856,0.0053271437,0.0022831259,0.000010896548,0.0000013338421,0.000036008514,0.014106997],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99482095,0.0006537654,0.0008563817,0.00034097853,0.0025605632,0.0007673477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99594176,0.00041455866,0.00050339167,0.00037409848,0.0018280428,0.0009381254],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017417317,0.0002194987,0.00038436175,0.00074111426,0.0031866885,0.05282882,0.0016117658,0.00021124893,0.000079505924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076765106,0.00015164797,0.0002192731,0.0017705323,0.00011277732,0.024753232,0.00047848446,0.001980315,0.00007986694],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004564115,0.00035027406,0.027283018,0.000034288874,0.00038903108,0.018522216,0.7474889,0.0002585518,0.00088467414,0.0058002635,0.09746112,0.10107126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005691231,0.00030700566,0.0044051874,0.00010570006,0.00004968414,0.00030038107,0.2245154,0.00001585305,0.00002609582,0.000056743036,0.76943916,0.00020967056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007741105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008388536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67197806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026145123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097336137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99886644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367676784","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0076","title":"Credibility on Scholar Performance Evaluation Using Google Scholar and ResearchGate","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Credibility; Computer science; Selection (genetic algorithm); World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Data science; Political science; MEDLINE; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.5875137084323918,"score_gpt":0.5029969346743838,"score_spread":0.08451677375800803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367676784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.983988,0.00051629,0.00013886327,0.012009125,0.0017730546,0.00016269441,0.000004937317,0.000024572226,0.0013825038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951167,0.00027381734,0.0032870693,0.00036767006,0.0007404907,0.0000029835624,0.000003493272,0.000019192705,0.00018856772],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875666,0.0016435069,0.001378422,0.00052063545,0.008444387,0.00044647936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812027,0.0027540133,0.0010771052,0.0007052151,0.013901994,0.00035896857],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20583038,0.00016105853,0.00032386513,0.0019716255,0.0014653179,0.05419959,0.001431158,0.00029013812,0.0001387907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31201044,0.00012173796,0.000108532855,0.0036634337,0.0001343677,0.12358049,0.00036228358,0.0052865525,0.00007461984],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038379378,0.0002407482,0.45725763,0.000083770035,0.000085436885,0.000030252913,0.0054758457,0.012833564,0.013133318,0.0023270424,0.021479605,0.486669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094107765,0.00021206477,0.8835639,0.00044976268,0.000036524634,0.00007013877,0.00444499,0.03847889,0.0006865801,0.059852816,0.011041239,0.00022203813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003793904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000065121385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48644698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038968318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013349121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367680925","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0059","title":"Chief Statisticians as Second-to-Last Authors in Biomedical Papers","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Key (lock); Computer science; Production (economics); Operations research; Data science; Management science; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.3840685578789365,"score_gpt":0.5258084745558161,"score_spread":0.14173991667687963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367680925","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95250034,0.00019597854,0.0014015697,0.026824428,0.0026660478,0.00014246888,0.00005861286,0.000026449678,0.016184082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99114776,0.00007554838,0.0029065285,0.0013322311,0.0004520585,0.0000029446242,0.0000044384715,0.000021383064,0.004057105],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9764642,0.0005684573,0.0019147423,0.0005558418,0.019535251,0.0009615217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836611,0.0069510913,0.0007744365,0.0005002277,0.006186749,0.0019263905],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.10469224,0.00016398712,0.0004949216,0.14906532,0.00025990861,0.096735,0.005077118,0.00028303365,0.0016120672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.43500608,0.000115575516,0.00019732854,0.2786518,0.00011328635,0.037277106,0.001007303,0.0027470735,0.00071145466],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007432709,0.00021035963,0.2010535,0.000009756374,0.000043150376,0.0012893759,0.0016836328,0.00016349618,0.0065796776,0.002351625,0.45068833,0.33585277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078782643,0.00045951683,0.6371861,0.000057555117,0.000004593237,0.00009734879,0.0035297305,0.0005076846,0.00007200959,0.011711112,0.34540617,0.00018033263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008193159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011288033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4361326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032524767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009788243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4368364174","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0074","title":"WAAI: A Weighted Author Affiliation Index for Journal Evaluation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Subject (documents); Publication; Index (typography); Journal ranking; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Library science; Information retrieval; Political science; World Wide Web; Citation; Law","score_opus":0.7034173796001133,"score_gpt":0.5923809843819302,"score_spread":0.11103639521818309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4368364174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9080787,0.0010314259,0.03487101,0.046168283,0.0063872836,0.000500469,0.000027947563,0.00003473176,0.0029002016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98937577,0.0001362548,0.0054004956,0.00030768514,0.0020704332,0.000008988471,0.000008975945,0.000023401022,0.0026680056],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96749145,0.00089590537,0.0021276418,0.00039853124,0.02838641,0.0007000435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91896856,0.0071770893,0.0026918347,0.0004518213,0.06979824,0.0009124814],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.28675333,0.00014802071,0.0003958282,0.0993847,0.0007606209,0.18882136,0.0038169706,0.00030856134,0.00035876446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.46214324,0.000099894096,0.00041915145,0.1450966,0.00004682041,0.10486032,0.00039448336,0.0019757207,0.000093377195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011019437,0.00006873626,0.041542422,0.000004575122,0.000050388127,0.000015040999,0.00036421936,0.0002490286,0.0015981931,0.0003877488,0.3640154,0.59159404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041627213,0.0009207465,0.37207323,0.000095661315,0.000072713694,0.00026759435,0.0035836878,0.120253876,0.0007820976,0.14552665,0.35190704,0.00035399746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007296499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004714023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59124005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005950181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016366602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.910823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379389436","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0073","title":"Toward a Potential Solution of the Crisis in Scholarly Publishing: An Academic Research Community Alliance Model","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Alliance; Public relations; Perspective (graphical); Academic community; Sociology; State (computer science); Set (abstract data type); Political science; Computer science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.4659224511730276,"score_gpt":0.4779319057638813,"score_spread":0.012009454590853674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379389436","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8804272,0.0007694216,0.0019211663,0.11318531,0.0014244401,0.00028128334,0.00004584657,0.000051388968,0.0018939436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955338,0.00021370554,0.0013955438,0.0014119432,0.00071952236,0.000009573143,0.000009302721,0.000045385783,0.0006611895],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96279085,0.011403049,0.004708082,0.000892156,0.018629279,0.0015766096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9714782,0.0037389067,0.0034430653,0.002147236,0.01834311,0.00084945315],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.25618094,0.000324327,0.00087045063,0.0037644529,0.0015634674,0.21101531,0.03150591,0.001521913,0.00004062138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31919596,0.00022505262,0.0004442388,0.014421096,0.00041810743,0.6078136,0.0050633885,0.040030204,0.000023407347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005092843,0.00040606948,0.20783965,0.000057751302,0.00009562336,0.000054942422,0.02387133,0.033425704,0.00985317,0.006038387,0.6869773,0.030870745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029992263,0.0002844684,0.36575088,0.0009203899,0.00005438295,0.00015479689,0.0741452,0.08098275,0.0010424851,0.46423894,0.0087900935,0.0006363804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002171173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024224767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67818725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007072893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00230483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977434},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4380609079","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0001","title":"The Quality Blog: Proposal of a New Format in Lieu of <i>Academic Research Blog</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Research, Science, and Academia","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Workflow; World Wide Web; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Publishing; Novelty; Scholarly communication; Public relations; Political science; Database; Psychology","score_opus":0.4609261440235405,"score_gpt":0.5478512374452121,"score_spread":0.08692509342167165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380609079","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95119834,0.001290919,0.000065500695,0.042029805,0.00048550556,0.00021433343,0.000007910527,0.000010485961,0.004697226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99556416,0.0009890408,0.0005799848,0.0001480209,0.0004286551,0.000002632132,5.2503384e-7,0.00001186832,0.0022751316],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97273165,0.003228402,0.004427396,0.00048366416,0.017884942,0.0012439333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9790413,0.011415619,0.002122492,0.00074364035,0.0060812123,0.0005957781],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2511011,0.00014139144,0.0005982492,0.002750823,0.0004903315,0.011477781,0.008249002,0.0003549178,0.00003244962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14662091,0.00007807895,0.00026800216,0.010582403,0.0007700857,0.052605852,0.0012161132,0.007967761,0.000036772013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067611074,0.00013897721,0.36151943,0.00007048393,0.000056216588,0.000072102914,0.012598779,0.00026468502,0.06858365,0.050853252,0.39496946,0.110196866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018918272,0.00047644024,0.24489585,0.00049823645,0.000008780999,0.0000830527,0.054242928,0.0007374835,0.0073602907,0.6212668,0.06830056,0.00023780942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039843647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011643437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57041353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001486839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032805698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99711686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381490040","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0025","title":"Exploring Author, Article, and Venue Feature Sets for Rising Star Prediction in Academic Network","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Expert finding and Q&A systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Machine learning; Computer science; Classifier (UML); Artificial intelligence; Empirical research; Set (abstract data type); Feature (linguistics); Ensemble learning; Supervised learning; Data science; Artificial neural network; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.1522723496817844,"score_gpt":0.317295330723369,"score_spread":0.1650229810415846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381490040","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97596556,0.0015398016,0.009635731,0.010061907,0.0025473745,0.000121987156,0.000003877042,0.000085069114,0.0000387137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98473835,0.00014692644,0.013391066,0.00015433723,0.001449882,0.0000124719445,0.0000018046651,0.000017457647,0.00008772261],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982397,0.00014249817,0.0004751348,0.00022005191,0.0005332188,0.00038941664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873716,0.00028894504,0.0003614864,0.0001661875,0.000274802,0.0001714121],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006810761,0.00010500998,0.00021252371,0.00048553804,0.0002585237,0.008530272,0.00063189375,0.00018958692,2.5589074e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019828447,0.00009765343,0.000061203515,0.0011601633,0.00001067416,0.05991183,0.0001705344,0.0017490565,0.000001863269],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018524047,0.0000765745,0.46357325,0.00029946916,0.00016796934,0.0003824638,0.057480566,0.014044588,0.020616148,0.013261148,0.22054201,0.20937058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034246135,0.0005034534,0.7262983,0.004126828,0.000037628677,0.0006322758,0.003562742,0.1564942,0.0006968169,0.017917935,0.085706584,0.0005986719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011146242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000031089585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26272503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012777475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008212973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.992499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382242092","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0017","title":"<i>Becoming the Writer You Already Are</i> by Michelle R. Boyd; <i>Becoming a Scholarly Journal Editor: Practical Advice for Editors and Tips for Authors</i> by Wayne Journell","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Writing and Publishing","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Sociology; Media studies; Computer science","score_opus":0.06048079589411846,"score_gpt":0.29429204063432696,"score_spread":0.2338112447402085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382242092","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16694951,0.017535042,0.010197288,0.6837745,0.11262489,0.0019935805,0.0016415926,0.0006210064,0.004662637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15405488,0.0021775283,0.018071702,0.033168137,0.7459024,0.00020361796,0.00034356164,0.000904371,0.045173775],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99373436,0.00052475056,0.0020895742,0.0005422201,0.0018233038,0.0012857956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868441,0.004788845,0.0029930654,0.00034624545,0.0041966406,0.0008310523],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.026989264,0.00053340377,0.00082477904,0.0007902442,0.003984313,0.1340134,0.0018027915,0.0006937745,0.000077671575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028991764,0.00039661382,0.0005300253,0.0004054852,0.00024979498,0.1250063,0.00034522804,0.008700196,0.0000092217915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001937496,0.00010064305,0.0007308624,0.000098441065,0.00023446647,0.000014992765,0.009638892,0.0000042799766,0.0013578348,0.0013462837,0.9842562,0.0020233353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025921003,0.0002943938,0.00003340663,0.00052614574,0.00028757998,0.0005139634,0.039951175,0.00058060803,0.00012953352,0.0038904282,0.95072746,0.00047321315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000073015275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018857092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65060633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002639752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044501483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382242328","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0015","title":"<i>Predatory Publishing</i> by Jingfeng Xia","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Evolution and Genetic Dynamics","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Predatory pricing; Ecology; Biology; Economics; Art; Microeconomics; Literature","score_opus":0.01357274793735216,"score_gpt":0.24273749965703648,"score_spread":0.2291647517196843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382242328","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96564823,0.0041259252,0.005154752,0.013184449,0.0020507334,0.000114962735,0.0000879338,0.00006768946,0.009565294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866293,0.00074976985,0.0019147763,0.0034402923,0.0015292123,0.0000032968323,0.00025841445,0.00005897449,0.005415928],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977895,0.00014863559,0.00060166017,0.00027111795,0.00079064706,0.00039843918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975058,0.000040051025,0.0004935546,0.00034112958,0.0012894141,0.0003300437],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003598523,0.00016900417,0.0002058423,0.00030122465,0.00017874024,0.014867357,0.0010902869,0.0004270895,0.000030643125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058666533,0.00016257261,0.00019222089,0.0005923068,0.000059293834,0.003175659,0.0003424688,0.001198042,0.000019109957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033950055,0.00003991074,0.008749402,0.0000140219745,0.000077347104,0.00001376674,0.00008399972,0.00024131942,0.19222064,0.00022707647,0.7950873,0.0032112927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012722269,0.00021764277,0.013887894,0.000052413387,0.0000294787,0.00015019996,0.0007130804,0.0003852042,0.0039671934,0.0006755112,0.9783427,0.0003064133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016411399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000118488115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18825346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056905472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029811685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98615533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385251539","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0070","title":"Combining Bibliometric and Social Network Analysis to Understand the Scholarly Publications on Artificial Intelligence","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social network analysis; Rank correlation; Rank (graph theory); Thematic analysis; Spearman's rank correlation coefficient; Bibliometrics; Network analysis; Test (biology); Data science; Computer science; Social science; Sociology; Library science; Engineering; Qualitative research; Mathematics; Social capital; Ecology; Machine learning","score_opus":0.6468525460429406,"score_gpt":0.5326740116500904,"score_spread":0.1141785343928502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385251539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7972415,0.0007744983,0.0506745,0.14675088,0.0011665904,0.00026462405,0.00003107337,0.000051669424,0.0030446372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99621034,0.00017201006,0.0011445346,0.0013875064,0.00064732233,0.0000033966553,0.0000039613874,0.000016203569,0.00041472263],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97983557,0.00081457064,0.001793589,0.000640048,0.016027264,0.0008889344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9672282,0.013587741,0.0012383839,0.0007119904,0.01640943,0.0008243053],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13056369,0.00019431885,0.0005402768,0.5533087,0.0020369315,0.34038255,0.0055726864,0.0002424097,0.0001273391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22188647,0.000121579586,0.0003838136,0.8940364,0.0001743363,0.061048556,0.0013625985,0.002693906,0.00012324267],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010288674,0.0001715949,0.16278838,0.0000042466427,0.0006247878,0.000031313575,0.0025789388,0.005865434,0.00018448534,0.08837257,0.16376549,0.57550985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021032858,0.00037674603,0.8159425,0.000018356935,0.00014142266,0.000020551504,0.0136411395,0.004943859,0.0000391777,0.13478005,0.029610388,0.00027546176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042305506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029566114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65315413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026053376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040743672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980766},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4385719678","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0081","title":"Identification and Portraits of Open Access Journals Based on Open Impact Metrics Extracted from Social Activities","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Identification (biology); Computer science; Scopus; Construct (python library); World Wide Web; Citation; Open research; Open science; Data science; Political science","score_opus":0.23303809875870782,"score_gpt":0.47515665334401774,"score_spread":0.24211855458530993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385719678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9662598,0.0002012873,0.00033627203,0.0071708313,0.00058036577,0.00031389575,0.00003646419,0.000021540069,0.025079539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99821204,0.00012761999,0.00019342065,0.00013414305,0.00056062534,0.0000031889044,0.000010323193,0.000016082335,0.00074255234],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969378,0.0004819652,0.00074095273,0.00019649944,0.0013685295,0.0002742515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99617743,0.00071169535,0.0016586041,0.000136224,0.0011206234,0.00019538906],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01581679,0.000119303564,0.00038692207,0.0014981854,0.0008449142,0.15896091,0.0042155017,0.00015877193,0.00027711078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009671317,0.00010620156,0.00012747118,0.0026422068,0.00006999695,0.16746818,0.0011132641,0.0008824824,0.0000024721824],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006278206,0.0005539737,0.5744243,0.00006920106,0.0007211131,0.000106372776,0.027385933,0.00021818778,0.011822739,0.006378416,0.12147282,0.25621906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001096219,0.000058457896,0.97555476,0.0002375342,0.00008814289,8.2658465e-7,0.00880982,0.00034878793,0.00036663396,0.007989872,0.0052697808,0.00017918723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018800893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034778632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40113038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021773911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005601244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99867064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387569775","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0042","title":"<i>Publishing during Doctoral Candidature: Policies, Practices, and Identities</i> by Jun Lei","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Sociology; Regional science; Geography; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.20418464063707142,"score_gpt":0.4822758591333295,"score_spread":0.27809121849625806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387569775","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86091036,0.004931048,0.000021857077,0.124064736,0.004429001,0.00020686786,0.00010073759,0.00012366127,0.0052117556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97168833,0.003593738,0.00048817505,0.004276067,0.0046593407,0.000022019492,0.00009554713,0.00007039445,0.015106369],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995917,0.00061739946,0.0011826988,0.00028802993,0.0011826082,0.00081225595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936908,0.0007927987,0.002581142,0.00030274974,0.0019620303,0.00067049643],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063368487,0.00021518159,0.00040233333,0.0008339288,0.002043336,0.022333702,0.00085321144,0.00050349924,0.00021089354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019897215,0.00019319491,0.00011538117,0.0012924664,0.00007226963,0.13873291,0.00047677357,0.005873925,0.000032534103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043323264,0.000056164517,0.0727317,0.00018846501,0.000093511146,0.000029094695,0.0076090083,0.0000063837288,0.0019466545,0.0028782268,0.9138631,0.0005543488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019774237,0.00007659642,0.1523309,0.00058719073,0.00008390924,0.00012925398,0.045129955,0.00002310999,0.000033598128,0.002029051,0.7972659,0.00033308918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021688894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056349515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11978867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005000893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010910312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387580639","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0007","title":"What Do They Say? Authors of Articles in Predatory Journalism and Mass Communication Journals Speak","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Media Influence and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public relations; Scholarship; Journalism; Government (linguistics); Publishing; Disinformation; Political science; Misinformation; Politics; Scholarly communication; Sociology; Social media; Law","score_opus":0.0810523950105555,"score_gpt":0.3615681465778345,"score_spread":0.280515751567279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387580639","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95706505,0.0077171596,0.00001188039,0.032379765,0.00078460184,0.00008474582,0.000003733163,0.000012638733,0.0019404275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9738081,0.024351394,0.00076632126,0.00043709375,0.00044112172,0.0000011330178,7.7946174e-7,0.000011645675,0.00018237565],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99609065,0.001057775,0.0010023904,0.00010014623,0.0013752577,0.00037377726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962612,0.0008049755,0.0010412643,0.00021595966,0.0012847054,0.0003919177],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.023657946,0.000097126234,0.00029355573,0.0009015287,0.00033176306,0.01829827,0.0009630725,0.0002330851,0.000064003594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012687552,0.000085216874,0.000092665156,0.0008306157,0.00019229391,0.08117242,0.0001122162,0.0017405484,0.0000046994433],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066425695,0.000108302505,0.6290296,0.00008007957,0.00012637272,0.00011679844,0.26458782,0.0002792321,0.0075443974,0.0430689,0.009804469,0.045187652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014487441,0.00012931245,0.27043617,0.0036032756,0.000072985364,0.00007665127,0.31199363,0.00008561852,0.00078958616,0.34785643,0.063176,0.00033159216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004068937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035869563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35859337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001441241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004627926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387580962","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0009","title":"Are Differences in Research Performance Creating a Glass Ceiling for Women Faculty in Business Schools?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Victoria; Vancouver General Hospital; McMaster University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Glass ceiling; Scopus; Gender disparity; Rank (graph theory); Gender bias; Medical education; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Demography; Social psychology; Medicine; MEDLINE; Mathematics","score_opus":0.5022278710713238,"score_gpt":0.42036223789279825,"score_spread":0.08186563317852558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387580962","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98685867,0.000057714067,0.000024864528,0.010324496,0.00030665976,0.00016869768,0.000009837989,0.000020539475,0.0022285369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99851954,0.00014628914,0.00033915642,0.00007621671,0.00039338862,0.000010005452,0.0000024753244,0.000006957872,0.00050597056],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99620295,0.0006650696,0.0005693992,0.00021190026,0.0015758997,0.00077480555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960414,0.00062414986,0.0004893984,0.000102631355,0.0025340451,0.00020837065],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03558165,0.00009268362,0.00030724745,0.0011906672,0.0009368581,0.012168247,0.0010427366,0.00020951855,0.000017402015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036271423,0.00008629533,0.000058265454,0.0036864935,0.00008352929,0.047258228,0.00020465693,0.0020381683,0.0000058144105],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064326094,0.00004906927,0.95457524,0.0000805126,0.000010074587,0.00002007169,0.04153559,0.000108006665,0.00006915585,0.00048039528,0.00070083013,0.002306714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059862324,0.000033433687,0.7529154,0.000339028,0.0000015968524,7.912403e-7,0.24146992,0.00017120187,0.000008179188,0.002063758,0.0023166637,0.00008144433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016998359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016496223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20165989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086742616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006717046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9930716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387581079","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0031","title":"<i>Global Shift, Seventh Edition: Mapping the Changing Contours of the World Economy</i> by Peter Dicken","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic geography; Geography; Economy; History; Economics","score_opus":0.032890139751026226,"score_gpt":0.22685517163329053,"score_spread":0.1939650318822643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387581079","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77904,0.0031220522,0.0007854243,0.071191125,0.0047053914,0.00027446236,0.000548298,0.00004335707,0.14028989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99214035,0.00004697947,0.00005528351,0.0038109445,0.0016397396,0.00000503292,0.0000072590506,0.000020556747,0.0022738609],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980617,0.00009616101,0.0011519934,0.00020385905,0.00007096416,0.00041531943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972739,0.0002798538,0.0018310773,0.00036684587,0.00012288133,0.00012541898],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063349796,0.0001586918,0.0004188748,0.0004999315,0.00034883592,0.0045132274,0.0013726336,0.000112859976,0.00020285723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083654263,0.0001217695,0.0003647762,0.0011878085,0.000103780556,0.017595554,0.000276333,0.00086339493,0.00005907737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029847886,0.00004682278,0.12508307,0.00004223437,0.0002928914,0.0000061923315,0.0032264807,0.0003269167,0.0000134803395,0.6234095,0.2462137,0.0013088138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009364293,0.000039937266,0.0585816,0.00017286936,0.00002214512,0.000045530687,0.0014858595,0.0001410828,0.00006612899,0.3022179,0.63603264,0.00025788948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000071563656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005465428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3898189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021682485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007819525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99652016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387707133","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0028","title":"A Bibliometric Analysis of Book Reviews Published in Translation Journals between 2010 and 2021","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Online Learning and Analytics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prestige; Bibliometrics; Social science; Period (music); Bridge (graph theory); Sociology; Translation studies; Library science; Linguistics; Computer science; Medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08205651825019551,"score_gpt":0.342256015305121,"score_spread":0.2601994970549255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387707133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7419324,0.07057046,0.07827971,0.107448995,0.0007632114,0.0002298198,0.000016541167,0.000057288606,0.0007015501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9292767,0.022254573,0.04648995,0.0005438258,0.00079374696,0.0000020085492,0.000019591385,0.000027409076,0.00059221743],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961272,0.00044906687,0.0016520208,0.00025116213,0.0012232038,0.00029738547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958834,0.0006742832,0.001625027,0.00033483823,0.0012305132,0.0002519268],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.019538933,0.0001392672,0.00084904826,0.16346522,0.000087244705,0.01920062,0.0013288594,0.0001788724,0.000046293906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00961446,0.0001142114,0.00033358284,0.27569696,0.000025902047,0.0829026,0.00017009398,0.0018193662,0.000003323506],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047805734,0.00004528641,0.56313735,0.00003924194,0.0003762428,0.000034947047,0.0007506016,0.0008420153,0.00046468774,0.00012520343,0.008372863,0.42580682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006424555,0.00010055791,0.9575804,0.00032904203,0.00036317078,0.000015590136,0.000090617854,0.018032078,0.000025692381,0.0014553496,0.021202149,0.0001628839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000043459953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011667369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42564392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052274812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016944858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387708535","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0047","title":"Reimagining the Covering Letter: Why, When, and How to Communicate with Journal Editors before Manuscript Submission","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Outreach; Library science; Space (punctuation); Value (mathematics); Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05221537420730972,"score_gpt":0.23563312380929816,"score_spread":0.18341774960198842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387708535","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3018619,0.00090053683,0.000345915,0.6878515,0.004575013,0.00016197845,0.00001189711,0.00011212208,0.004179139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97219837,0.00022776876,0.0023855183,0.008403453,0.013445129,0.000006732843,0.000016383037,0.00007916449,0.0032374803],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996769,0.0005695432,0.00060070923,0.0001932489,0.0013926448,0.00047481759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954762,0.00038251615,0.0009382418,0.00066544116,0.0021309792,0.00040664128],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010635925,0.00024267338,0.0003446446,0.0008199303,0.0025566968,0.1806531,0.0027076511,0.000115180366,0.000034563986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038080115,0.0001354092,0.00012604815,0.0003342625,0.00019475642,0.115674734,0.00074882986,0.0057214536,0.000006318801],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008228319,0.000027283988,0.006889254,0.000021738135,0.0001315922,0.00006244146,0.052217677,0.000039891514,0.0004291724,0.0030311078,0.9220359,0.015031693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006316143,0.00027904715,0.005041049,0.0005006792,0.00005894029,0.00034423274,0.015733218,0.000095329066,0.00002480909,0.0030584668,0.9740317,0.0002009188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017227951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021268227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.679448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016196902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017563242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99874187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396998324","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0036","title":"At the Intersection of Disciplinary Practice and Science Policy: Publication Language Choices of Social Sciences and Humanities Scholars in Poland","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"linguistics and terminology studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Intersection (aeronautics); Sociology; Social science; Digital humanities; Humanities; Political science; Art; Geography","score_opus":0.06233581178192172,"score_gpt":0.3418649899031413,"score_spread":0.2795291781212196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396998324","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95129234,0.0048029283,0.00000174464,0.010900577,0.0004005716,0.000046851856,0.000013227018,0.000005650934,0.032536127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998755,0.00009578373,0.000065201966,0.00016118212,0.00057081954,0.0000010185628,6.5515513e-7,0.000004289463,0.0003460775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989093,0.00006994976,0.0003630812,0.00012405656,0.000405737,0.00012788801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982625,0.0003611937,0.00040354437,0.000053354117,0.0008983391,0.000021046671],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003824168,0.000068671514,0.00014532305,0.0006997902,0.00079659576,0.010192102,0.00027881877,0.00003521808,0.000012755737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051885312,0.00004343572,0.000029944393,0.00025272486,0.0018702507,0.02479464,0.0002999876,0.0004774404,1.9114118e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004353149,0.000052548963,0.014077106,0.00013818928,0.00008070961,0.000010541774,0.24890408,7.7810716e-7,0.001988148,0.727502,0.00077602966,0.0064263726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012282482,0.0011184128,0.28936496,0.0011219895,0.00028471442,0.0004233107,0.5244356,0.00023794541,0.0008865626,0.032406636,0.14808014,0.00041149562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061994314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070016354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69509536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008278834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021500642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9908354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396998342","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0005","title":"Are Pay-Walled Doors of Access Open During the Pandemic? Analysing the Open-Access Landscape of COVID-19 Research","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doors; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Geography; Business; Virology; Computer science; Medicine; Outbreak","score_opus":0.498306297989154,"score_gpt":0.5648653942347585,"score_spread":0.06655909624560447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396998342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85980225,0.005025894,0.0008831842,0.11996087,0.0015073675,0.00082773314,0.00006476923,0.00002773989,0.011900222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946951,0.000423626,0.00015483837,0.0017770325,0.0007604848,0.000016134232,0.0000028061959,0.000038775313,0.0021311988],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.980016,0.0047577424,0.0039502955,0.00094999035,0.009495165,0.0008308361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9689174,0.015330685,0.0054546096,0.0018018717,0.007792557,0.00070283614],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.17548713,0.0002990494,0.001174623,0.0025607727,0.0016289708,0.47771034,0.0788587,0.00041371232,0.00074959925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19203357,0.00013090885,0.00043717222,0.01186922,0.0004890861,0.32209814,0.023269039,0.008208198,0.000006875922],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051613257,0.000098543496,0.6918064,0.0001350832,0.0004675874,0.00013381305,0.004742427,0.0021828772,0.0006521937,0.0017280667,0.28513935,0.01239756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035720093,0.00014948734,0.50755084,0.0022870344,0.00028602532,0.0005990547,0.065277465,0.0024112165,0.0010672886,0.098441,0.3176884,0.0006701555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027329484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007036161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1842555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038879126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036612055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396998351","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0006","title":"Presence of Geographic Names, Title Length, and Title Changes","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Lexicography and Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.029070959055726545,"score_gpt":0.2360868772457954,"score_spread":0.20701591819006887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396998351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032771867,0.07096654,0.000010322355,0.0025154378,0.001654028,0.000029964072,0.000017051712,0.000024516157,0.8920103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99075234,0.00073022646,0.00009298796,0.00009577688,0.000819072,3.444325e-7,5.2862106e-7,0.000005725009,0.007503024],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997449,0.00000866167,0.00006605875,0.000030963023,0.000108968175,0.000040444193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997848,0.000028636437,0.000035847188,0.000029057852,0.00010526166,0.000016357799],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022948463,0.000026053027,0.00005101824,0.00013808071,0.000035970937,0.0019392206,0.00006637836,0.00001776387,0.0010692494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009480287,0.000017979164,0.00003065055,0.000032602573,0.000046238038,0.002629721,0.000019270701,0.00020259421,0.000010417376],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007035473,0.000031006733,0.0026027418,0.0002723674,0.00030457776,0.000044027434,0.026480835,1.5804476e-7,0.00015796164,0.3723562,0.48892108,0.108822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028548906,0.000022616387,0.00032883417,0.00010953346,0.000014026704,0.000006307612,0.00093579,0.0000030363813,0.000016382419,0.0017269725,0.9967825,0.00002548444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022115397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027955899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95798045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000023244513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010969227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396998364","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0022","title":"Clearer Academic Guidelines to Assist Authors and Editors Are Needed to Navigate Geopolitically Sensitive Conflicts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Health and Conflict Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.17117532957773662,"score_gpt":0.4874466486684719,"score_spread":0.3162713190907353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396998364","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43025047,0.0010280715,0.0004142323,0.55701923,0.009194872,0.00038848765,0.0000503267,0.000088560264,0.0015657409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55946434,0.00028661147,0.004905459,0.37774044,0.050387457,0.000057678837,0.000007649873,0.00015043977,0.0069999266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99504274,0.00049223483,0.0018693825,0.0003917312,0.0011680408,0.001035873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898652,0.0015496229,0.00046285646,0.00020402696,0.005715521,0.0022027954],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0085609425,0.00027854324,0.0006457971,0.00077083294,0.0010521057,0.0037977742,0.00044705847,0.00063822174,0.000042578027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043128632,0.00021987679,0.000121417645,0.0008309465,0.000058911697,0.01327408,0.0005060603,0.0070819776,0.0001488025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018774894,0.0000147124565,0.0071776863,0.00041316412,0.00015601478,0.00023306892,0.047387086,0.000008960768,0.0006620862,0.0027389752,0.9343634,0.0066570896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039699796,0.00017189617,0.036521703,0.00407717,0.00006291098,0.000053500513,0.035636768,0.00003524293,0.000035784728,0.00032505073,0.9224578,0.00022516784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007805155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003146271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17927878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004208413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010459214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399371019","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0079","title":"A Rapid Investigation of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content Footprints in Scholarly Publications","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Computer science; Information retrieval; Data science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.12928573707092703,"score_gpt":0.3083854016389009,"score_spread":0.17909966456797385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399371019","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9695902,0.007849967,0.012656808,0.008924719,0.0005880754,0.00008391795,0.000009129015,0.000017158385,0.00028002454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98929554,0.00031409727,0.009654671,0.00024181207,0.00036625663,0.000005045135,0.00002239526,0.000013449417,0.00008674931],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808735,0.00017789172,0.00086336874,0.00022890937,0.000447671,0.00019482394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796116,0.0000744385,0.0003131403,0.00019896169,0.0012971113,0.00015517797],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033187151,0.000114966504,0.00020262646,0.00055592245,0.000052837913,0.006010108,0.0005734541,0.00032305156,0.000018988463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008317075,0.000096822434,0.000116613046,0.0007778664,0.00013947442,0.0015096697,0.0001237463,0.0010331704,0.0000025722172],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065923225,0.000070898925,0.011745718,0.000047214045,0.000110368615,0.000015544314,0.00043713534,0.000031191412,0.7155743,0.0036780047,0.0022587976,0.2659649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010150187,0.0021429248,0.13903157,0.0016608383,0.00014210888,0.0004436538,0.005651197,0.0020524994,0.7177556,0.019828869,0.10945145,0.00082425313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003705648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026356376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26514065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056054607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005061852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99569166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399539386","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0011","title":"An Empirical Study on Roles and Their Information Correlations for Interdisciplinary Peer Reviewer","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Empirical research; Peer review; Knowledge management; Business; Sociology; Psychology; Data science; Computer science; Political science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.12167602113375058,"score_gpt":0.46876297456758664,"score_spread":0.34708695343383605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399539386","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8858361,0.0008707848,0.042895515,0.06546647,0.0019709705,0.0005972147,0.0000639813,0.000030693824,0.002268249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979217,0.0000061209166,0.0004883443,0.00030307734,0.00076014583,0.000015138508,0.000012201031,0.000009133878,0.00048415354],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996057,0.000421249,0.0010823035,0.0002150124,0.0020387003,0.00018579046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891698,0.0013279298,0.00034524823,0.000281998,0.008642187,0.00023283782],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.019967603,0.00012849011,0.00026162196,0.001201364,0.00046637116,0.06737409,0.00079502515,0.0001080013,0.000039885956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017728994,0.00007359822,0.00013655306,0.0010741395,0.000037768652,0.14006954,0.00029454773,0.0010942181,0.000025832785],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008537308,0.0004912134,0.030624557,0.00003724717,0.00014561121,0.000027732402,0.07473154,0.00037498891,0.00026182097,0.0026857443,0.5987738,0.29099202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019412991,0.012236426,0.17654893,0.00080099166,0.00008549531,0.00020994182,0.3334216,0.047161788,0.00007609887,0.122829065,0.3042265,0.00046188987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":6.6519317e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021516329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29454732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011323012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002958414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9905451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400228654","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0087","title":"Tens of Thousands of American Academics on the Editorial Boards of Journals Run by Predatory Publishers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Advertising; Media studies; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.40426981837671777,"score_gpt":0.5168890013989549,"score_spread":0.11261918302223711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400228654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9424108,0.007917002,0.0010882587,0.018409472,0.02482693,0.00019289531,0.0003158873,0.000012858756,0.0048258435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99127275,0.0008380485,0.0006200626,0.00021162807,0.0066773156,0.0000013611723,0.0000015667641,0.000025503494,0.00035176994],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9685999,0.0008649876,0.0030414022,0.00041820566,0.026523769,0.00055171695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9564618,0.014290655,0.0041016056,0.0007844945,0.02370573,0.00065571314],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.13190149,0.0002007997,0.0008460734,0.04001811,0.00016848782,0.056313735,0.0071687116,0.00038417068,0.00023607828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28348705,0.0001089885,0.00060326443,0.101138815,0.00054898043,0.059428696,0.0007198595,0.004945384,0.0000036666045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010303448,0.00013124604,0.03508885,0.000020475274,0.00014592591,0.0000071653726,0.0004188835,0.000051239054,0.016254093,0.0005667746,0.90497464,0.042237684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011575242,0.002193478,0.027321829,0.0006457566,0.0000968939,0.000067460525,0.008683811,0.0007597872,0.01630404,0.010164922,0.93226063,0.00034384674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009622658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000015882567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15158556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002212068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015312108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400228656","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0084","title":"Copy-Editing Expectations of Authors from the Middle East","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Digital and Traditional Archives Management","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Middle East; Computer science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.0974580232186645,"score_gpt":0.23167842545778863,"score_spread":0.13422040223912413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400228656","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37152374,0.0027702027,0.0006538302,0.040530227,0.0048766234,0.00012388136,0.0004319627,0.00006228251,0.57902724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951945,0.00000974023,0.00035726783,0.00023624321,0.002751249,0.000001947203,0.000022604656,0.0000116525125,0.0014148263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987124,0.00005035493,0.00044681577,0.00009651397,0.00057707663,0.00011679283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887633,0.00037228235,0.0002386202,0.00008631403,0.0003575989,0.00006886329],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005999986,0.000080533995,0.00012376641,0.00018005173,0.00024632397,0.026870858,0.00045562652,0.000014633393,0.00027405558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049911987,0.00005043947,0.00016703787,0.00008922363,0.00010873058,0.03596039,0.000075022755,0.00065541634,0.000019493857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009697279,0.000060956143,0.00024871822,0.000032740627,0.00024223191,0.000032286953,0.059311204,0.000024405084,0.000031416515,0.8728952,0.048794366,0.018316804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028820557,0.00013854372,0.0056974795,0.0012934024,0.00014769068,0.000024260347,0.10877735,0.00022074344,0.00003609324,0.26193637,0.6212778,0.00016206478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000681454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003150913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62367076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026692242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059954502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97752315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400228657","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0083","title":"Ethical Expectations of Academic Research by College Undergraduate Students","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Psychology; Undergraduate research; Undergraduate student; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Medical education; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.23984430963125214,"score_gpt":0.5948978196038079,"score_spread":0.3550535099725558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400228657","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20727283,0.009589316,0.0016504368,0.7502859,0.004569372,0.00046993847,0.000062577325,0.000067356916,0.02603223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98988205,0.0011489432,0.001872102,0.0029567985,0.0011774059,0.000016088365,0.0000048948605,0.00004618655,0.0028955124],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97745514,0.012486269,0.0020723876,0.00030063614,0.007025399,0.0006601516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.943776,0.04784521,0.00084558513,0.00032926592,0.0065941745,0.00060973724],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11292415,0.00013651657,0.00039155528,0.0009933898,0.001354617,0.00283681,0.0020392474,0.0019913455,0.00021641358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28621283,0.00011172056,0.00013169406,0.0018987334,0.0003468638,0.03303665,0.0006384243,0.12036309,0.00010115726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008623069,0.000100828525,0.01018961,0.00041680573,0.00018027567,0.000106407235,0.010572885,0.0000018503027,0.0041694134,0.21674179,0.7567086,0.00072530244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019589227,0.00044381537,0.0043476135,0.006524989,0.00015943365,0.00009601505,0.122733355,0.00012346948,0.00021670472,0.4311849,0.4319425,0.00026829843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000072620605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018762401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7826092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006977639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030966615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400228675","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-0005","title":"<i>Writing with Pleasure</i> by Helen Sword","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"SWORD; Pleasure; Aesthetics; Art; Sociology; Computer science; Psychology; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.023004649281093196,"score_gpt":0.26348972237869583,"score_spread":0.24048507309760264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400228675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46737525,0.015513564,0.00086837367,0.07433841,0.0022082136,0.00008765248,0.000019237326,0.00011857289,0.43947074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99102557,0.0001475005,0.0005821729,0.0013140431,0.0019736462,8.5587027e-7,0.0000010499637,0.000013757239,0.004941425],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847156,0.00010865163,0.0003580963,0.00013185361,0.0005714255,0.0003583983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988757,0.00020177025,0.00012869002,0.00006484719,0.0003331894,0.00039584257],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004081376,0.00008299242,0.00017669357,0.00014638113,0.00047776767,0.020475617,0.00046098125,0.00012111881,0.00018977003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010768068,0.00006485727,0.00010081097,0.00023409554,0.00012243446,0.04501226,0.00002517461,0.0011563875,0.00002791555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007142294,0.00009611934,0.009020871,0.00008435131,0.00020920586,0.0002810975,0.016017355,0.000009829125,0.0008463546,0.16531783,0.7059068,0.102138765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017227748,0.00006374568,0.00023198243,0.00020689951,0.00002291831,0.000038731785,0.003397356,0.000009399269,0.000022853312,0.003877529,0.9918485,0.00010775998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049829215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011601113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5236503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028650442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055695424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9805412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400228684","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0063","title":"Hidden Dangers: COVID-19-Based Research in Predatory Journals","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Zoonotic diseases and public health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Geography; Ecology; Data science; Biology; Computer science; Virology; Medicine; Outbreak","score_opus":0.32110599399205936,"score_gpt":0.47230654877854433,"score_spread":0.15120055478648498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400228684","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42966673,0.048978478,0.0013908293,0.49354297,0.0021207533,0.0005996396,0.00004740574,0.000105447885,0.023547728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839655,0.0003951229,0.0023314224,0.010186208,0.0025059662,0.0000071830827,0.000010425173,0.00004751262,0.0005506369],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938991,0.00080182916,0.001228167,0.00031947144,0.0030524859,0.0006989459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99333364,0.0013887159,0.00028362518,0.00038202794,0.002141206,0.002470764],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.036100354,0.0001643714,0.0004808646,0.003655253,0.00018787761,0.025984028,0.00069486204,0.0003292857,0.0013691119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028869376,0.00012921411,0.00026687974,0.0023278191,0.00010120191,0.0366259,0.00010813066,0.0065246783,0.000023035642],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012884669,0.0010825491,0.10128735,0.0039290907,0.00040231153,0.017563274,0.004149981,0.0001682155,0.0010316598,0.0057219053,0.5912125,0.27216268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039997254,0.0008807389,0.030516189,0.005516906,0.00010649687,0.0013859948,0.005633718,0.0011756645,0.000037393726,0.008120911,0.94237804,0.00024823405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002528304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022047541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55429876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017398116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015250023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995438},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4400228689","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0095","title":"The OMICS Group and Its Agents: An Evidence Base","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Base (topology); Group (periodic table); Omics; Biology; Bioinformatics; Chemistry; Mathematics","score_opus":0.19685807915538586,"score_gpt":0.4205694963209118,"score_spread":0.22371141716552592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400228689","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8396852,0.0580317,0.0025965974,0.092310406,0.0051670894,0.00015159913,0.000014298805,0.000055673183,0.001987406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923904,0.0019063773,0.0007637771,0.0021358118,0.0015375518,0.0000020756554,9.268674e-7,0.000022571865,0.0012404864],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992765,0.00083773193,0.0014622211,0.0004780421,0.0040606065,0.00039640948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884976,0.0072245277,0.00083632395,0.0005075932,0.0023097594,0.00062417134],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07189365,0.00017603496,0.0003042941,0.00068625074,0.0007653853,0.391687,0.0065202103,0.0002706276,0.00006687944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15240578,0.000095081494,0.00015625218,0.001723333,0.000094569994,0.44567266,0.0007748003,0.0040319823,0.000025912053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001439467,0.00005184789,0.019684024,0.000027201351,0.00011374809,0.00033137258,0.003426667,0.00008605392,0.0016979382,0.037188392,0.43582344,0.5014254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006658469,0.00035760645,0.03927212,0.0012578202,0.00010707164,0.0013949495,0.010476785,0.023087965,0.00024122036,0.12469286,0.79793096,0.0005148279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033500874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018123992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5009105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014478303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042455632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400228696","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0069","title":"The Puzzles in Research-Ethics Review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Management science; Economics; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.5966123365570214,"score_gpt":0.6509630726045578,"score_spread":0.054350736047536374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400228696","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013268397,0.24094619,0.00013189153,0.70007944,0.0036368493,0.00027011932,0.0000014641806,0.00002470824,0.05358249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21318041,0.68067867,0.004254959,0.08244826,0.008710026,0.00007029339,0.0000032414819,0.00012924879,0.010524863],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9582135,0.032563835,0.0023287185,0.0002762904,0.0057012476,0.0009163911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.71252143,0.27226982,0.0011426511,0.0008977619,0.012478054,0.0006903185],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.45034066,0.000106217805,0.0003001508,0.00050647167,0.002576251,0.010519393,0.0018498681,0.00078983535,0.00020184436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.74994934,0.00006203646,0.00011383704,0.0018381784,0.0003146428,0.051439214,0.0005206557,0.14358205,0.00018913961],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000312697,0.000029220448,0.0016800349,0.0033802232,0.00004671339,0.0003313259,0.0063499347,7.41535e-7,0.00006968976,0.27187762,0.6940756,0.022127667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015783966,0.00003550261,0.000929282,0.031509817,0.00001921416,0.000040606126,0.00731013,0.000015577685,0.0000012342667,0.15212883,0.80779773,0.00005425002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018040065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036340638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6176312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006843558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051612873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99872226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400228700","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0019","title":"Bibliometric Methods in HRM: Contribution and Utility","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Business and Economic Development","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Regional science; Business; Management science; Computer science; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.03621126884213235,"score_gpt":0.309543516559186,"score_spread":0.27333224771705367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400228700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9746642,0.0036190487,0.011896163,0.004359278,0.0008428215,0.000057250632,0.0000017830655,0.000011804109,0.004547665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97636956,0.00027244844,0.022991737,0.0001899788,0.00006772718,0.000001127202,7.147961e-7,0.0000059063104,0.000100813006],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884367,0.00009324692,0.0004576758,0.00015779889,0.00027087584,0.0001767618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999461,0.00015998393,0.00013121626,0.00006979496,0.000059256872,0.00011877387],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009680531,0.000072814175,0.00016345746,0.005903394,0.00005341595,0.011356185,0.0002282048,0.000092711205,0.0005403436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021083425,0.0000593027,0.000038768714,0.013598129,0.000036799873,0.048779164,0.00019058022,0.0006992602,0.00001524345],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010624057,0.000023775376,0.40193278,0.0000125830165,0.000013920422,0.000033589746,0.0001602182,0.000029398558,0.0011012863,0.00018366722,0.0050931303,0.59140503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021948694,0.00001428652,0.86322254,0.00005347103,0.0000065062427,0.00008131673,0.000052388856,0.00095797266,0.00012963054,0.0027782484,0.1324165,0.00006765703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011758041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015278998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5913374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030882828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044049917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9896701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400279587","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0082","title":"On Editor’s Instructions to Manuscript Reviewers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Writing and Publishing","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Information retrieval; Data science","score_opus":0.04267888791321341,"score_gpt":0.2622091494199377,"score_spread":0.2195302615067243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400279587","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09327957,0.014322202,0.00057359476,0.20684771,0.20521358,0.000313611,0.00009548731,0.00043858442,0.47891566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73256916,0.000351535,0.0020077035,0.016749842,0.21939403,0.000011537908,0.000013561333,0.0001239472,0.028778706],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975431,0.000111354035,0.00073971547,0.00021685185,0.001083236,0.0003057398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997725,0.000308626,0.00024087178,0.00018000144,0.0012235615,0.00032190353],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043163043,0.00016678119,0.00026694487,0.0009606683,0.0004385769,0.08994182,0.00082534924,0.00014864448,0.000670948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007544477,0.00013088755,0.00022127855,0.00027121053,0.000054362543,0.08445257,0.000091235845,0.003674186,0.00011045435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008428548,0.00001190032,0.0000279119,0.000051416064,0.00003709798,0.000024386743,0.006312646,0.000014053065,0.00003680862,0.20411642,0.77418494,0.015174018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011896567,0.00012712975,0.000048935704,0.001516065,0.000040349758,0.00008136003,0.004354128,0.000012963955,0.00000901226,0.0094749825,0.9840666,0.00014952797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000073108604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017293707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63928956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021343965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020173145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400279613","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0081","title":"Unraveling the Attributes of Productive Scholars in Social Science Fields: A Study of Chinese Scholars Publishing in Top-Tier International Journals","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Higher Education Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Sociology; Social science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04419173067124945,"score_gpt":0.369558910131415,"score_spread":0.3253671794601656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400279613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9613662,0.0015794273,0.000064136264,0.03129392,0.0026163019,0.00026474198,0.000008519813,0.000009133067,0.002797628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99770635,0.00016048262,0.00057031726,0.00024316215,0.0011476508,0.000007486248,7.0783125e-7,0.0000117104855,0.00015215398],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935699,0.00053351646,0.0014990602,0.00032585824,0.0036607059,0.000410923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99396133,0.00049665314,0.0010740532,0.00017616204,0.004155932,0.00013586781],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.033123117,0.00015278945,0.00038013933,0.0019593835,0.0005203147,0.023923984,0.0023834805,0.00017553198,0.00006746727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032433208,0.000113139395,0.00012297378,0.0049058464,0.0002509984,0.1224316,0.0002843497,0.0033464343,0.0000013581089],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006286174,0.0005028457,0.7391732,0.000023842804,0.00009792125,0.00003355579,0.24191979,0.00017551864,0.0009067573,0.0028502273,0.0017806574,0.012472867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092385465,0.00009601147,0.8903297,0.0007150119,0.000018450406,0.000015425288,0.08869969,0.000021456402,0.00017465604,0.008757882,0.010069073,0.00017877576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010610109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00050332677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15322009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009107773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034290175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99895287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400279615","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0060","title":"The Conceptual ‘APC Ring’: Is There a Risk of APC-Driven Guest Authorship, and Is a Change in the Culture of the APC Needed?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Process management","score_opus":0.4187322829833594,"score_gpt":0.5087527598051707,"score_spread":0.09002047682181125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400279615","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88248605,0.0319837,0.0000048462125,0.08069882,0.002019523,0.00045076894,0.00022031915,0.000014166122,0.0021218178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858565,0.0037044424,0.000032738553,0.008680817,0.0014171079,0.000014784589,0.0000015877405,0.000019680805,0.00027234174],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950778,0.0026063004,0.00091264205,0.0002306912,0.00069770025,0.00047485455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964495,0.0016100876,0.00073321006,0.0002714334,0.00061688235,0.00031890432],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009964398,0.00023566198,0.0003826387,0.0001519303,0.0006019348,0.002219992,0.0015041534,0.00097271625,0.0001992873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021134862,0.00011571622,0.00025643347,0.00084588584,0.00062535616,0.0065417076,0.000268283,0.013400222,0.0000036996362],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00088565145,0.00047848804,0.32966217,0.00066763954,0.001362338,0.00019568973,0.49181896,0.00004269241,0.0066183885,0.018678967,0.115970075,0.03361893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032022055,0.00064908783,0.0842963,0.0015197346,0.0011404783,0.0005126921,0.084911145,0.0025835282,0.010704046,0.010836313,0.7991811,0.0004633387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025954665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007202432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.683211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009136599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028020015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988158},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4400279629","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0073","title":"The Ethics of Scholarly Book Reviewing","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarly communication; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Public relations; Business; Political science; Engineering; Law; Publishing","score_opus":0.11204363840746501,"score_gpt":0.3054112954532895,"score_spread":0.19336765704582448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400279629","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023585375,0.54828435,0.0005614458,0.27496687,0.008383521,0.00029322147,0.000035198856,0.00018834406,0.14370167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95950526,0.016437717,0.0014928923,0.0044305017,0.0043708966,0.000009115965,0.000013195993,0.000095432755,0.0136449775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994752,0.0011038766,0.0015922008,0.00021468443,0.001970461,0.000366761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891728,0.0027187525,0.0010167661,0.00073205924,0.0061549554,0.00020467196],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.033657063,0.00021240924,0.00040097398,0.00060050155,0.0015611217,0.31547508,0.0030900736,0.000286436,0.00017500132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033311747,0.00013738971,0.0004223018,0.00037413396,0.00028729078,0.34528407,0.00034754144,0.011380049,0.000022877626],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034971206,0.000060839793,0.00036272965,0.0002532471,0.00031559184,0.000027212414,0.040626027,0.0000071264158,0.00066486833,0.6952546,0.20710206,0.055290684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019224506,0.00010724244,0.0002655731,0.0016482214,0.00009850091,0.00005966767,0.004307782,0.000054429547,0.000056919063,0.014587856,0.9784679,0.00015367346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001400348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007951041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9359199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002057157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089890306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400279652","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0086","title":"Crossing Between Clinical Work and Scholarly Publishing: Early-Career Neurosurgeons as Clinician-Researchers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Health and Medical Research Impacts","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Work (physics); Public relations; Scholarly communication; Career development; Medical education; Sociology; Psychology; Business; Medicine; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.4386141857581262,"score_gpt":0.4952040327805905,"score_spread":0.05658984702246428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400279652","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7465574,0.008282613,0.00023111308,0.23968974,0.0015104653,0.00034061872,0.000016803157,0.00009819727,0.0032730568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9730929,0.0010912332,0.0015426779,0.016179748,0.0062540984,0.0000049139608,0.000014689605,0.00011344553,0.0017062863],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864588,0.0014759876,0.0028908702,0.0007731562,0.006126083,0.0022751326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91428965,0.01994228,0.0016955246,0.0016952445,0.0138501385,0.04852719],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07687071,0.0003774839,0.0011890093,0.0018358609,0.00066970603,0.25611925,0.001242654,0.0012882731,0.00016694178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6800544,0.00029050716,0.0005956423,0.0026756867,0.00075626886,0.18615352,0.0006099169,0.026382813,0.00006314946],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039959943,0.00011337246,0.5807936,0.00021329199,0.00027388302,0.0022026517,0.0007771806,2.8543235e-7,0.000097004035,0.00024132157,0.10141948,0.31346834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022115824,0.0014176202,0.5472014,0.0024595992,0.00016259668,0.00035972113,0.00037284783,0.000012597835,0.000021623806,0.0010280232,0.444551,0.00020141041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000283559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006837358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6031837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057719933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020811843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400279810","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0074","title":"<i>Behind the Curtain of Scholarly Publishing: Editors in Writing Studies</i>, edited by Greg Giberson, Megan Schoen, and Christian Weisser; <i>The Inner World of Gatekeeping in Scholarly Publication</i>, edited by Pejman Habibie and Anna Kristina Hultgren","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gatekeeping; Publishing; History; Media studies; Art history; Sociology; Art; Political science; Literature; Law","score_opus":0.036061006169176055,"score_gpt":0.26982616657230163,"score_spread":0.23376516040312556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400279810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68524665,0.08436033,0.00003743639,0.22266148,0.0037083111,0.00074307603,0.00026584862,0.00011878467,0.0028580828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99089533,0.0013191336,0.00038936172,0.0016636002,0.0046037002,0.000045687982,0.00016601557,0.00011263177,0.00080454705],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896743,0.0019965973,0.0038631007,0.00085783866,0.002653047,0.0009550812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831409,0.0032994135,0.0029860712,0.0010851041,0.0089987395,0.0004898061],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03517542,0.0006555284,0.0011605856,0.0033365786,0.0013952343,0.21225597,0.0038740432,0.0005318004,0.00004624842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04865466,0.00048344402,0.00025894787,0.0028342032,0.00096120837,0.33562297,0.001037549,0.012424311,0.0000017000455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017413947,0.00041469347,0.053484455,0.00052590086,0.00057508145,0.000031477102,0.06800873,0.000012395016,0.004224917,0.018220784,0.84460694,0.009720467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003534317,0.00042961302,0.019304553,0.005682318,0.00033025444,0.00013042582,0.07929758,0.00090723904,0.00042184847,0.005766444,0.88310266,0.0010927792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032393667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025602584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30564868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048010828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005801384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404845821","doi":"10.3138/jsp-55.3.fm","title":"Front Matter","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Front (military); Geography; Meteorology","score_opus":0.029798341833220852,"score_gpt":0.28259367091095233,"score_spread":0.2527953290777315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404845821","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034972215,0.07441603,0.0002493306,0.014404752,0.038969807,0.0002673802,0.00085507846,0.00007565736,0.86726475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005254993,0.00045832587,0.004041173,0.003977626,0.02301675,0.000009725984,0.00020264862,0.0010514224,0.9619873],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99095654,0.00054726406,0.0026417114,0.00067532866,0.0042248974,0.0009542283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98954314,0.00025458753,0.0035140978,0.0008306441,0.005047679,0.0008098763],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009579591,0.00082577206,0.0015492211,0.004050165,0.00020667803,0.26379427,0.004121686,0.0017984918,0.08020971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034026257,0.00067551294,0.001172569,0.0009761194,0.00009489833,0.2062049,0.00086544774,0.023867918,0.6606752],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008082141,0.00007383658,0.00025442682,0.0003228847,0.0009079686,0.0005516256,0.00049820595,0.000060119048,0.0014637646,0.000040248367,0.99488074,0.0008653535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006192328,0.000107130065,0.00042279318,0.003598683,0.00050676113,0.0015285442,0.00026816176,0.0000068966715,0.00013212016,0.000760755,0.99139297,0.0006559344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010855239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010720017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5804655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001995225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001931541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406983810","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-0016","title":"On Defending History with Big, Short Books on Broad Topics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Data science; Computer science","score_opus":0.07399015631686835,"score_gpt":0.2339684884239959,"score_spread":0.15997833210712753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406983810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24212666,0.00075292087,0.000027037315,0.0021974836,0.002524748,0.000073589064,0.0000060688562,0.000036866844,0.7522546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9055483,0.000014750406,0.00007161357,0.0072320667,0.0017529057,0.000002765423,0.0000036452418,0.00002713587,0.08534683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998047,0.00006942162,0.0005351157,0.00019944577,0.00084362476,0.00030538268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826974,0.0001932697,0.00026966401,0.00025146586,0.00087095215,0.00014488325],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011830103,0.00021090529,0.00030808384,0.00078508316,0.00041317657,0.030034184,0.00071346905,0.00010034688,0.0003566094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079117995,0.0001570671,0.00017776283,0.00006160875,0.00012897728,0.029174397,0.00007305958,0.0020711995,0.000009129718],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001886748,0.000115598275,0.0006080275,0.000029426714,0.00011560777,0.00008832822,0.0037582633,0.000013878005,0.000012505305,0.85677403,0.109511405,0.02878426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050704513,0.0006414283,0.00086211995,0.0007113143,0.000048376965,0.000017946486,0.0027499439,0.0000028221734,0.00003170701,0.010408101,0.9838229,0.00019633753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005212452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019137477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87431145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066447636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029644603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.984404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406983814","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0002","title":"Publishers and Authorial Voice in Applied Linguistics Research Articles: A Corpus-Based Study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Translation Studies and Practices","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Corpus linguistics; Applied linguistics; Computer science; Natural language processing; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14366437808219,"score_gpt":0.3638870340979866,"score_spread":0.22022265601579663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406983814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6107442,0.0041261124,0.0001597218,0.021118093,0.0057949577,0.00068979344,0.000011169856,0.00005035675,0.35730562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99745923,0.000021022166,0.00041493605,0.00038214133,0.0014167946,0.000006777058,8.772708e-7,0.000010459676,0.00028773927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975902,0.0003681074,0.0006936944,0.00018680269,0.00088767544,0.00027356096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99575037,0.0015302337,0.00031282636,0.00014735457,0.0021551426,0.00010407277],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0105836345,0.00011048152,0.0002687339,0.0010410985,0.0005870441,0.05271003,0.00039465245,0.00008140496,0.000056702796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00826757,0.000092735034,0.000046204692,0.0004564101,0.00012660882,0.01322925,0.00009231796,0.002171124,0.000002465333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027478687,0.0023882312,0.212538,0.0002987254,0.00065012585,0.00017025262,0.12147483,0.0001854953,0.00016259993,0.41822445,0.076916344,0.16424307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026334962,0.0002490993,0.009140073,0.000111834575,0.000056102974,7.783057e-7,0.058212634,0.000070370384,0.0000065372883,0.0059041656,0.92350763,0.0001073081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046672474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021276078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84659123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000083734434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029283308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98976505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406984367","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-0001","title":"Would Artificial Intelligence, Like ChatGPT, Be a Good ‘Peer’ Reviewer in Academic Publishing? A Human Versus AI-Based SWOT Assessment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"SWOT analysis; Publishing; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Data science; Business; Political science; Marketing","score_opus":0.2664174969948431,"score_gpt":0.49045029774792676,"score_spread":0.22403280075308368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406984367","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43026203,0.005172133,0.007280679,0.53437287,0.0117029,0.0011144298,0.000012305705,0.00008933758,0.009993301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9707743,0.00028253434,0.0028340158,0.023057278,0.0023561812,0.00003912699,0.00005217284,0.00004077857,0.0005636353],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99322385,0.00041504132,0.0029477803,0.0004968407,0.002183406,0.00073308626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988591,0.0008043647,0.0012488667,0.0005849158,0.008178598,0.00059226906],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014658208,0.00033317454,0.00083238876,0.0024324593,0.0003614914,0.013161806,0.0010824486,0.0013091955,0.00021424884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034465328,0.00030423672,0.00034729284,0.0028209176,0.0001175278,0.039259434,0.00015464213,0.014023435,0.00001022673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023597486,0.0020385378,0.2141623,0.0011673656,0.00040613938,0.0002759753,0.00481599,0.00042508237,0.0030447384,0.056243483,0.16634592,0.5487147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002598978,0.004582526,0.06622263,0.01876838,0.0012334584,0.00016592264,0.033877026,0.004747204,0.012813614,0.08891746,0.76431924,0.001753552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00078599784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003363379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59797335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001644249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040217363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406984385","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-0044","title":"A New Family of Rankings of Universities","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Higher Education Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Geography; Regional science","score_opus":0.01797988313408163,"score_gpt":0.29958796678838506,"score_spread":0.28160808365430345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406984385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8993824,0.0018959467,0.0025960328,0.01779056,0.0013839279,0.000055648416,0.000005852538,0.000007540533,0.07688207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9714111,0.00023882168,0.0104594845,0.0006241519,0.00020682698,1.5475155e-7,3.1846426e-7,0.0000032046692,0.017055944],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850506,0.00008564107,0.00040839388,0.000058498816,0.00082683854,0.00011559537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974334,0.00012961314,0.00065057195,0.00007105678,0.0016304497,0.0000849019],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022719766,0.0000450711,0.00018038247,0.00034329327,0.00009786788,0.0009837126,0.0005595532,0.00008449995,0.00007169384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000749716,0.00004468059,0.00008523212,0.0006735883,0.00005971008,0.022163803,0.000044693526,0.00034044246,9.628963e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011626778,0.000120670025,0.09516278,0.00006463709,0.0002453989,0.000006374099,0.12606624,0.000024894267,0.0027885018,0.20853494,0.52977026,0.037099026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008593641,0.00004047998,0.21544938,0.00050426536,0.00004185883,0.0000011109146,0.11019087,3.8083954e-7,0.00057195977,0.0101550715,0.66209775,0.000087546156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034207685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007284097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19837986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023861407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051444457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9915127},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4406984516","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0052","title":"Academics’ Behavior on STM-Journal WeChat Public Account Platform: A Uses and Gratifications Perspective","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Ideological and Political Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Uses and gratifications theory; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Social media; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.11951252507932383,"score_gpt":0.3885570506493809,"score_spread":0.2690445255700571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406984516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7414911,0.001049845,0.000247385,0.22513317,0.0014548809,0.00016516184,0.0000070723463,0.000023894398,0.030427506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99318963,0.0005532324,0.0006631751,0.0033781237,0.001053935,0.000007138324,0.0000012324807,0.0000062448853,0.0011472587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978225,0.00027803492,0.0005418145,0.00016166185,0.0008202326,0.00037570845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954284,0.00062035915,0.0004533434,0.00010529707,0.002964714,0.0004278956],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046161273,0.00011657565,0.00021360375,0.0006125199,0.0013323869,0.022891711,0.00069668615,0.00034873033,0.0001267631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024530586,0.00008920128,0.00011400813,0.0006915041,0.00026687304,0.04107806,0.00006977003,0.0029109893,0.000005306508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018841178,0.00016553256,0.019669253,0.000003548449,0.00003496531,0.000004953354,0.0063752965,8.879269e-7,0.0001026516,0.9551308,0.007817371,0.010675903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008138639,0.0002442049,0.18516454,0.0002245555,0.00015872618,0.00010316308,0.1447063,0.000007414797,0.000085112144,0.39355493,0.27465665,0.00028054582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036485167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000107870685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56157583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013946124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406984580","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-0015","title":"The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the International Collaboration on Academic Papers in Mainland China: Taking Economics as an Example","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Medical Research and Treatments","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Mainland China; China; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Geography; Mainland; Regional science; Political science; Economic geography; Development economics; Virology; Economics; Medicine; Outbreak","score_opus":0.09360941908706229,"score_gpt":0.41076445434906905,"score_spread":0.3171550352620068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406984580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9594283,0.00017508412,0.000019868423,0.032854237,0.0001879042,0.00019647356,0.0000103718885,0.0000044317662,0.0071233325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966091,0.00087287935,0.000035539626,0.0020645645,0.00018298718,0.0000049967175,0.00001157421,0.000007350204,0.00021100644],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823135,0.0002494766,0.00050652097,0.00013442292,0.00067358563,0.00020461534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971756,0.0015202989,0.00050253345,0.00018902599,0.00029532498,0.00031722418],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006164654,0.00009836103,0.00020162656,0.00038044984,0.00017246675,0.0020423457,0.00053874776,0.0001450378,0.00009650833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036571834,0.000048195325,0.00009524989,0.00034744845,0.00006208349,0.0037157552,0.000055987523,0.0020672963,0.0000019310482],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037499827,0.00028743304,0.93288827,0.000020683921,0.0005696773,0.00007732459,0.0013048807,0.0007049809,0.0017170064,0.014100879,0.007072616,0.037506264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008300143,0.0023352627,0.9378095,0.00082975614,0.0000624518,0.0001347579,0.0039825295,0.0012693476,0.00021183676,0.022254275,0.022688873,0.00012123515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006872202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015624065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037385028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013652322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023799557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99899364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406984730","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-0014","title":"Information Privilege as Capital: An Analysis of Scholarly Communication Practices through Autoethnography and the Bourdieusian Framework","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Social and Cultural Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autoethnography; Privilege (computing); Sociology; Capital (architecture); Public relations; Epistemology; Social science; Political science; Geography; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02437584672172745,"score_gpt":0.3561685240369593,"score_spread":0.3317926773152319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406984730","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9259776,0.0028060542,0.0017524859,0.051019244,0.00032412028,0.0001977261,0.000008141339,0.00002771266,0.017886935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907362,0.00174173,0.005488097,0.0018474793,0.000114484574,0.0000037773245,0.000011786095,0.0000040054965,0.000052470885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99676955,0.0011362499,0.00074097875,0.000088688146,0.0010702836,0.00019425132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933553,0.00090786803,0.0025434755,0.0002924315,0.0027903866,0.00011055309],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0093472805,0.000108424276,0.00035511382,0.00051818194,0.0013908846,0.03609263,0.001296466,0.00033882048,0.00002198435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020596547,0.0000755547,0.00025533087,0.0030750476,0.00051295094,0.24874365,0.0001561442,0.0019096249,7.193246e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008492296,0.000050738196,0.060345855,0.00001291141,0.00079454196,4.814641e-7,0.192292,0.00004558307,0.0000137690495,0.7374551,0.00023780997,0.0086662695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084190076,0.00007630522,0.3049104,0.00022055421,0.0015809542,0.0000026715538,0.4526771,0.0002565755,0.0000055425794,0.19264823,0.04660705,0.000172742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009902706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022245292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5448069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011688786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036342855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407169477","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0056","title":"The Disruptive Innovation Evaluation and Empirical Analysis of Chinese, Japanese, Indian, and South Korean Scientific Journals","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Regional science; Business; Geography; Advertising","score_opus":0.13794744604754594,"score_gpt":0.43246171878810313,"score_spread":0.2945142727405572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407169477","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9759061,0.0038503145,0.000051773884,0.018723123,0.0004465207,0.00016201488,0.000005463043,0.000003485034,0.000851239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99867845,0.00018182927,0.00033198018,0.00043354506,0.00012887121,0.000002891814,0.00000929184,0.0000041260255,0.00022900685],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976309,0.00019983768,0.0008356315,0.00016547987,0.0010227074,0.00014542589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914772,0.00046120968,0.00086681294,0.00017698808,0.006917297,0.000100513396],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012451848,0.00009552597,0.00037692272,0.0022670808,0.00053908327,0.0055225077,0.00015989643,0.0001003531,0.000009893778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017450156,0.000057678302,0.00008291921,0.005493038,0.0002324401,0.007550488,0.000109034656,0.000771352,1.5835685e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081022146,0.000046435005,0.9485093,0.000041095904,0.0010218245,0.0000017192465,0.024672741,0.000008073949,0.00010004063,0.0002636759,0.0012375474,0.024016526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056860066,0.00006325864,0.95804363,0.0001433837,0.0010441594,0.000023715047,0.037599552,0.00023829326,0.000017486625,0.0015753492,0.0006378378,0.00004474929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000229504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015605205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023971776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012035813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006009416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99550986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408108363","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-0032","title":"Visualization and Bibliometric Analysis of Research Evolution on Metaverse","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Visualization; Data science; Metaverse; Computer science; Bibliometrics; Geography; Epistemology; World Wide Web; Human–computer interaction; Data mining; Virtual reality; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08448440436927343,"score_gpt":0.40207569730022935,"score_spread":0.3175912929309559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408108363","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43574104,0.00071992446,0.5574598,0.0030443876,0.00011194869,0.000072378345,0.0000030045308,0.000011755881,0.0028357662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965786,0.000167356,0.0029852393,0.00015641282,0.000027363267,9.815336e-7,0.0000013348662,0.0000022977713,0.0000804551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976749,0.0002922968,0.00049486506,0.00016266809,0.0012161799,0.00015910389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995059,0.00060617743,0.00038927197,0.00032417628,0.0034948299,0.00012653212],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009910945,0.000059544047,0.00022729766,0.1429166,0.00017014374,0.01073567,0.00086791563,0.00009471617,0.0000043169925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01093837,0.00004996502,0.000094848474,0.26403123,0.000044224373,0.0369045,0.0002181862,0.00060077367,9.198098e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026190728,0.00021532968,0.020126963,0.00002837709,0.0005949983,0.0000026733062,0.00047565368,0.00076643296,0.0023407352,0.908334,0.004641902,0.06244674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005357858,0.0003483428,0.9353713,0.00014387304,0.0002573183,0.000005678949,0.00047128633,0.0359889,0.0010310563,0.019784704,0.005968754,0.000093042036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012677198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000069398725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9152443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018706982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025872188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973929},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4408399371","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-0024","title":"Tracking Research of Indian Council of Agricultural Research: Insights From Scientometric Analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Livestock Management and Performance Improvement","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Regional science; Research council; Geography; Environmental resource management; Environmental science","score_opus":0.3048824596720135,"score_gpt":0.35891291592402136,"score_spread":0.054030456252007864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408399371","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99056524,0.0043845302,0.0000036170513,0.0018696447,0.00033169735,0.00014019893,0.000023414455,0.000010816205,0.0026708217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986664,0.00020230892,0.000121531346,0.000023645776,0.00064977887,0.0000023591542,0.000017251787,0.0000013406953,0.0003153527],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926191,0.0004126354,0.0008276795,0.00027458783,0.00546525,0.00040072366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99093735,0.001236374,0.00037218275,0.00010096514,0.0071501723,0.00020294482],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.016276892,0.00011516495,0.00035208932,0.0018621987,0.00033631423,0.011770418,0.0013688897,0.00015095194,0.00017606902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035946916,0.00004230334,0.00028551483,0.022415724,0.00015760228,0.028810037,0.00028245902,0.0018152505,0.0000057780353],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000119317454,0.00049845595,0.14270446,0.00022460801,0.0018620037,0.000068830195,0.014115214,0.0002808776,0.6512611,0.0022417437,0.01169849,0.17492492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001852795,0.0007442001,0.96920484,0.00037966744,0.00012970141,0.0000028853472,0.008018067,0.0001030903,0.0065028444,0.0017570853,0.012843095,0.000129254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019760432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006459489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82650036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048682385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026202362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408399519","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0053","title":"Toward the Transparent Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Academic Articles","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Generative grammar; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Cognitive science; Psychology","score_opus":0.5422255158546339,"score_gpt":0.4591159335578543,"score_spread":0.08310958229677956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408399519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8796577,0.004469979,0.0150159905,0.09950227,0.0011197235,0.00017323227,0.00000324876,0.0000114903905,0.000046380635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958886,0.00073671836,0.0017184049,0.0007170035,0.00089533156,0.0000041743115,0.0000018064377,0.000012670493,0.000025308818],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975001,0.00016892787,0.0012990766,0.00014681627,0.00066542916,0.00021965668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99779624,0.00071219227,0.00025302783,0.00014027003,0.00094804453,0.0001502527],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032982016,0.00010052334,0.00025133608,0.00048754635,0.000057269463,0.002733911,0.00026816645,0.0001815607,0.00005614716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050470633,0.00006495266,0.0001312892,0.0008913453,0.00009421072,0.016967956,0.000024656621,0.0025185656,0.0000066924026],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003761338,0.0001959753,0.026700288,0.00024140422,0.0001040115,0.00013126186,0.06429953,0.0014843359,0.024612706,0.014218597,0.0020900546,0.8655457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016291943,0.002119507,0.057165015,0.008982706,0.00057185424,0.0012741698,0.12808646,0.04187411,0.53334653,0.2120089,0.013773837,0.0006339927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003447677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007428637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86491174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020288888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006900349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408399559","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-0002","title":"Global Research Trends in Predatory Publishing: A Bibliometric and Topic Analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Bibliometrics; Geography; Regional science; Library science; Data science; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.0873241423199289,"score_gpt":0.33956999199970067,"score_spread":0.25224584967977176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408399559","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9048532,0.009555462,0.00053534773,0.011832182,0.0009293094,0.00008426451,0.000013640449,0.000089437504,0.07210714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99697685,0.00008024048,0.0002766075,0.00042014327,0.0013988835,0.000003678719,0.000012359809,0.000024752917,0.0008064691],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99611354,0.00006558608,0.00091848156,0.0004772299,0.0017980891,0.0006270558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969748,0.0002679598,0.00040871958,0.00027611837,0.0019925537,0.00007980278],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012760692,0.00021083813,0.0004517292,0.14215149,0.00018233903,0.267517,0.0013216725,0.00029733704,0.0001346595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01343344,0.00018908303,0.00024906683,0.26261276,0.00009829217,0.33448926,0.0008138521,0.0026731773,0.000014609541],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035849716,0.00008570596,0.68590665,0.00019236532,0.00025746852,0.00040480008,0.00007653316,0.000046408906,0.000033969256,0.043344047,0.070551604,0.19906461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004619047,0.000035973757,0.78324807,0.00032106575,0.00013387436,0.00004472518,0.00031345914,0.0019032604,0.000002794121,0.016178764,0.19713655,0.00021958278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010003193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005481348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19884503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004949263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015355689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408399580","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0032","title":"Understanding the Open-Access Practices of China’s Science, Technology, and Mathematics Journals: Insights from Editors","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Mathematics education; Sociology; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.33294892615023775,"score_gpt":0.4814280866043024,"score_spread":0.14847916045406467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408399580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7470248,0.020002034,0.028306957,0.15408753,0.013478085,0.0003747393,0.000029979727,0.000058123314,0.03663778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929899,0.00031553255,0.0038743324,0.00026218325,0.0023385773,0.0000019519218,4.389149e-7,0.000020827649,0.0001962623],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99050415,0.000366906,0.0022335052,0.0005618923,0.005949787,0.0003837828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98456645,0.0052100588,0.0059118965,0.00072453177,0.0032155383,0.00037155094],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.050309308,0.00022185374,0.0006335441,0.006207776,0.0011299029,0.48473468,0.023593854,0.00037402337,0.000097603974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16943645,0.000115586496,0.00013009533,0.013279303,0.001017335,0.48651314,0.0055675087,0.0050061136,0.0000036763804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001338029,0.0003093362,0.067998156,0.000094024166,0.00066823233,0.00026870365,0.024026778,0.00034218488,0.012231251,0.42266366,0.42953822,0.041725665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041176856,0.00008128812,0.009469351,0.0012446919,0.00010775927,0.00036604784,0.04005507,0.0018988755,0.0007122084,0.8737593,0.071676016,0.00021760451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017775364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019740577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45109567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030678863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022072818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99728936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408399694","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-0023","title":"They Rejected My Paper: Why?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; History","score_opus":0.4707725526660492,"score_gpt":0.5219823587712209,"score_spread":0.051209806105171674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408399694","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7229684,0.04052682,0.011899838,0.119856596,0.011668838,0.00025621796,0.00004134911,0.00013020796,0.092651725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907016,0.00061739696,0.0028297892,0.0014183548,0.0011283442,0.0000011875812,0.0000011625768,0.000022825541,0.003279328],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9772882,0.00053119566,0.0015818104,0.0005124141,0.01948376,0.0006026363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97090274,0.007910934,0.00065610005,0.00071837945,0.018866306,0.0009455328],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.104350336,0.00016047325,0.00039210092,0.08253033,0.0002952704,0.40778327,0.005857642,0.0002637289,0.0012188434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29236552,0.00009582439,0.00040962634,0.1433235,0.000069461144,0.1881438,0.00080871367,0.0032990458,0.00026205077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002972418,0.000078151024,0.028006652,0.000010352963,0.0000766792,0.00044480714,0.0005510164,0.00003101165,0.0060677608,0.005732177,0.62047505,0.3384966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000371148,0.00022397938,0.03893701,0.00010998296,0.000016134136,0.0003433898,0.00094497576,0.000923847,0.00023888098,0.06085222,0.89686525,0.00017316718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009182758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001571615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3383234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028375036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091132725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409873082","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-1115","title":"Deterring Academic Integrity Breaches: The Roles of Institutions, Academics, and Support Services","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Business; Public relations; Political science; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.057431009558487456,"score_gpt":0.33924627141216374,"score_spread":0.2818152618536763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409873082","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8847469,0.007999465,0.0015831894,0.07917008,0.0011057385,0.00017904749,0.000017294176,0.000032536,0.025165759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916443,0.0037475165,0.0008710453,0.002841389,0.0005671046,0.0000013925652,0.0000016735299,0.0000053132894,0.00032023375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972381,0.0005230068,0.0008631791,0.00015378055,0.00092676264,0.00029518362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970888,0.0007360594,0.00078095635,0.0001280734,0.0011090811,0.00015702535],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.018173313,0.00012555251,0.00029587242,0.00038278959,0.000763553,0.0034710197,0.0017371117,0.0014039917,0.000018090164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072963457,0.000090330985,0.00011657225,0.0005749644,0.0004552228,0.035969257,0.00026108223,0.015996065,0.0000011714069],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010342463,0.000054911696,0.37551507,0.00017153211,0.0002687475,0.000009935464,0.12580155,0.000024585295,0.0022212525,0.39401424,0.012075803,0.089738965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007284028,0.000061014292,0.03482892,0.0017333615,0.000234785,0.000086323635,0.17106298,0.000092069415,0.001270306,0.050008148,0.73962146,0.00027223563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017229512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095499906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7275457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017369784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012642151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409873136","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-1119","title":"Looking through the Assurance Lens: Institutional Governance of Academic Integrity Strategies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Lens (geology); Business; Through-the-lens metering; Academic integrity; Accounting; Process management; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.044758271758392455,"score_gpt":0.3312513709131979,"score_spread":0.2864930991548054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409873136","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26931503,0.022017583,0.028890241,0.26108587,0.0050896658,0.00028172342,0.000039591832,0.000047105063,0.4132332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99111027,0.0034835453,0.0017127271,0.002263012,0.0008773428,0.0000014719453,8.2213637e-7,0.0000045034285,0.0005462928],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99653083,0.0005966136,0.00085126667,0.00015135694,0.0015611022,0.00030882843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954046,0.0013053197,0.0010996725,0.00014562873,0.0019883786,0.00005640156],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01204865,0.00012431073,0.0002922734,0.00010921242,0.0009045108,0.0049804067,0.0020025345,0.0009869152,0.000047446043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02731453,0.00008828621,0.00017444974,0.0008558174,0.00064805587,0.09167339,0.00012738991,0.0153375035,0.0000022185077],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003887892,0.000020862004,0.008569864,0.000028237564,0.00006824582,0.0000057957727,0.00957572,0.00017250546,0.00036558992,0.95158756,0.023740873,0.0058258935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000507914,0.000033161283,0.033200998,0.0017557626,0.00006528318,0.000026896361,0.03247206,0.00003147725,0.00045261066,0.24055077,0.6907318,0.00017124505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003267441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004921747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72179526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034908584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004140628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409873165","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-1114","title":"Promoting Academic Integrity through a ‘Pedagogy of Inquiry’","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Pedagogy; Sociology; Mathematics education; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08337221275963277,"score_gpt":0.4037724410125136,"score_spread":0.32040022825288084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409873165","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7419164,0.004560513,0.007262664,0.16896929,0.003660199,0.00023686091,0.0000070400138,0.000049224032,0.073337816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904004,0.0007496942,0.0041172463,0.002163728,0.0015255316,0.0000014817707,0.0000012344572,0.00000950404,0.0010311927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958563,0.00094913604,0.0012126573,0.0001899435,0.0013634197,0.00042854584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948387,0.00082260324,0.0012494161,0.00015108562,0.002778099,0.00016006685],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.022372648,0.0001385945,0.00044051465,0.00044719147,0.0004895703,0.0035531104,0.0018268819,0.0018471172,0.000087314584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056527294,0.000121842626,0.00021319391,0.001150681,0.00035834813,0.061252445,0.00020830263,0.019917972,0.0000035134358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012694219,0.00012879404,0.0676708,0.00014238506,0.00022623606,0.000026912225,0.33388913,0.0000073223164,0.0040317317,0.45746922,0.07937399,0.056906532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010781871,0.0001402712,0.008244553,0.0023407135,0.00015017804,0.00004404261,0.11566893,0.00004719392,0.0029634957,0.27504104,0.59397167,0.00030971927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002091235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012788872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5145977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032117538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024656123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409873169","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-1121","title":"The Usage of Generative Artificial Intelligence According to Sociodemographic Characteristics of Undergraduate Students","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Generative grammar; Mathematics education; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.1311312307739944,"score_gpt":0.4283712646905473,"score_spread":0.2972400339165529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409873169","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9318915,0.00047488743,0.01763395,0.048106186,0.0014722986,0.00022926481,0.0000038478656,0.000005635464,0.00018243238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965355,0.00041210282,0.0017870317,0.0007477387,0.0004078069,0.0000036745375,0.000002036847,0.000009514531,0.00009459522],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969585,0.00017964104,0.0016100267,0.00014217125,0.0008762404,0.00023340156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99422693,0.0007201075,0.001001818,0.00023916006,0.003648076,0.00016389955],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004585225,0.00011552652,0.00039965505,0.0005761628,0.00027695208,0.002142212,0.00061759364,0.00013876094,0.000004998397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00983339,0.000083822844,0.0001738792,0.0011152112,0.00011617182,0.0045539555,0.00011754728,0.0010818788,0.0000018565671],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005317119,0.0003536463,0.51389396,0.00016064433,0.00032413154,0.00000995155,0.004021863,0.00004686776,0.019617425,0.018114619,0.0010836315,0.44184157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026917423,0.0025889801,0.4069796,0.005482454,0.0008384923,0.00007921179,0.091029085,0.0007291908,0.25211626,0.23586726,0.0035019517,0.00051833293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012020528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031566957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44132322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015856489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070497894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409873178","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-1123","title":"Establishing Reliability and Validity for a Survey Tool Testing Higher Education Teachers’ Intentions to Adopt Artificial Intelligence in Their Teaching Practices","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Humber Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Validity; Psychology; Test validity; Mathematics education; Knowledge management; Computer science; Management science; Engineering; Psychometrics","score_opus":0.3945693415030073,"score_gpt":0.452516183237981,"score_spread":0.057946841734973664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409873178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9126054,0.00020639747,0.05801022,0.026107224,0.0019560796,0.00028708598,0.000042460397,0.000014424289,0.00077070587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96556115,0.000010403255,0.03261286,0.0012040097,0.0003740709,0.000008308349,0.000007645159,0.0000089536,0.00021261652],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949568,0.0013572114,0.0016588921,0.00047342197,0.0012081281,0.00034552722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95712876,0.027815964,0.0032851908,0.0008103479,0.010587981,0.0003717388],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.091782555,0.00017849002,0.00042597495,0.0008437945,0.000602255,0.050210755,0.0013333857,0.00021301495,0.000013621249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5548762,0.0001287089,0.00013671353,0.0020977969,0.000056807254,0.07515513,0.00037087547,0.0018287357,8.2374476e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017800563,0.0004459941,0.47282833,0.00002859618,0.000023262,0.0000014794043,0.0026061216,0.00017281456,0.0012324208,0.0038534156,0.012622154,0.50600743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016816499,0.00012814775,0.9152849,0.000437961,0.000026363361,0.000010098307,0.01107495,0.00072916714,0.00007056792,0.055465586,0.01641069,0.00019342457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011921887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002670343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50581396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002534371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012054241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9507752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409873188","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-1125","title":"Redefining Academic Integrity in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence: The Essential Contribution of Artificial Intelligence Ethics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Cégep André Laurendeau","funders":"","keywords":"Generative grammar; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.17808150460707015,"score_gpt":0.4384952264725874,"score_spread":0.26041372186551726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409873188","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5609627,0.0015762972,0.06845911,0.36004615,0.0025533237,0.000475336,0.00001813981,0.000014614373,0.0058943396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99613416,0.0007647486,0.0007137035,0.0015500701,0.00080748403,0.0000025549696,0.0000032339715,0.0000061833402,0.000017882538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99236053,0.003155188,0.0018227326,0.00018888332,0.0020677543,0.00040488105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882834,0.005135938,0.0014350028,0.00021127397,0.004850543,0.000083863],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05756012,0.00014590801,0.0004304232,0.00040295685,0.0010222056,0.005919001,0.001993122,0.0009498093,0.000019291525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12604281,0.00009765624,0.0002411734,0.0018483097,0.0011979315,0.012509662,0.00016628786,0.013018581,7.1817107e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000091256275,0.00008697883,0.0009967762,0.000013482379,0.000048568912,0.0000081820635,0.10011854,0.00016383588,0.0034807813,0.8810198,0.00023523708,0.013736559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058723548,0.00010801623,0.001686684,0.00046368132,0.00006739639,0.0000024309236,0.14669839,0.00016675086,0.007509878,0.8420814,0.0010428879,0.00011370889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030043735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004443307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43517146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024282516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026263923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99511296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409873225","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-1124","title":"Leveraging Generative Artificial Intelligence with Transparency: Enhancing Academic Integrity in Higher Education","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Generative grammar; Academic integrity; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Mathematics education; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Computer security","score_opus":0.0955611416544958,"score_gpt":0.3529809603280865,"score_spread":0.2574198186735907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409873225","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6112816,0.0035615808,0.073049635,0.23011522,0.0048482134,0.00034267962,0.0000034958962,0.00004889919,0.07674868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98953074,0.0003278716,0.0050691315,0.0024181881,0.0011928274,0.0000047502995,0.0000018802104,0.000007766708,0.001446823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969312,0.0006704569,0.00090190093,0.00022598129,0.0009072476,0.0003632366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975522,0.0004747384,0.0004852065,0.000099721976,0.0012331129,0.00015500818],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010367704,0.00014545885,0.00028756692,0.0007392859,0.00045453612,0.0046717227,0.00093646895,0.00094072585,0.00015650148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004152124,0.00012457086,0.00007543366,0.0013725775,0.0001462262,0.035101872,0.00003888153,0.014886444,0.000002767032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021841799,0.000180649,0.04594177,0.00004861949,0.00008699849,0.00002558525,0.09527535,0.0003075744,0.0030429265,0.6998271,0.0044351933,0.15060987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047807462,0.00016326887,0.026913166,0.0050133565,0.00014880853,0.000029534587,0.16406995,0.00018786897,0.008916325,0.6884746,0.10486104,0.00074402295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021482524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014579772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37824917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007511298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039797775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409873242","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-1113","title":"Autonomy, Integrity, and Academic Integrity Support","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Autonomy; Data integrity; Territorial integrity; Structural integrity; Scientific integrity; Personal Integrity; Research integrity; Business; Computer science; Political science; Computer security; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Engineering; Public relations; Social psychology; Law; Library science; Politics","score_opus":0.05512154170556225,"score_gpt":0.3527725967982754,"score_spread":0.2976510550927131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409873242","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33497745,0.0034137405,0.0065788524,0.3858186,0.004316461,0.00026587292,0.000016126485,0.000102276164,0.26451063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97977704,0.0013080486,0.0048286184,0.006787284,0.0014084767,0.000002103226,0.000002790505,0.000011193124,0.0058744205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966295,0.0007022464,0.00089909876,0.00022934597,0.0010873094,0.0004525238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960751,0.0009040505,0.0005934034,0.00014089409,0.0019207321,0.00036580593],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.025732031,0.00016302103,0.00038626345,0.0006714014,0.0007168617,0.011292598,0.001532477,0.002183586,0.00019897253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0329589,0.00014319982,0.00015094104,0.00075412466,0.000355317,0.058789793,0.0002932038,0.03673416,0.000009294233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007219247,0.000054591488,0.17925462,0.000041219562,0.00013303915,0.00004030665,0.022479981,0.0000010208748,0.00039783798,0.5322235,0.1879955,0.07730616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005483241,0.00006398259,0.020510772,0.00040675784,0.00007852113,0.00005914269,0.01717658,0.000021069138,0.00017090864,0.13731182,0.8234446,0.00020749935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021889857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024939218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64479965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059336063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044723274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409903211","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-1116","title":"Understanding Academic Integrity at the University of Rijeka: How Student-Oriented Is It?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Structural integrity; Research integrity; Data integrity; Mathematics education; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Social psychology; Computer security","score_opus":0.12116266544815853,"score_gpt":0.33930084898062013,"score_spread":0.21813818353246162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409903211","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3437864,0.0016742059,0.02647977,0.57009286,0.0018698478,0.00020678455,0.000020661488,0.00002379546,0.055845674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861868,0.0012835487,0.00031038682,0.0029925471,0.00031246073,1.07360016e-7,0.0000012999667,0.0000051770785,0.008907653],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99640894,0.0012244692,0.00040510565,0.00016583099,0.0014758387,0.00031982202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99626863,0.0013506985,0.0007789056,0.00015500105,0.0012887068,0.00015803975],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.022912689,0.00011421244,0.0002750426,0.0003173406,0.001509945,0.0025711372,0.0018146294,0.0010746424,0.0002510248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012557274,0.000090300906,0.0002065459,0.0010114058,0.00046323848,0.024670431,0.00034051834,0.011954588,0.000003596574],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110502,0.000041858875,0.1293835,0.00002430922,0.00023686945,0.00001663559,0.09366758,0.000008350187,0.00039752526,0.12610698,0.6482817,0.0017241657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063117786,0.000042814765,0.0062219375,0.0005127277,0.000120722565,0.0000064380565,0.46683824,0.000030704658,0.000117693155,0.012652745,0.512701,0.00012379796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010607741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008078892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64240044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015528103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009205811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409903227","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-1122","title":"GenAI and Academic Integrity: Redefining the Role of Writing Centres in a Shifting Digital Landscape","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Geography; Sociology; Architectural engineering; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.02266195009763907,"score_gpt":0.2934967210000999,"score_spread":0.27083477090246083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409903227","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8927846,0.009376181,0.0001044394,0.029558232,0.00022016333,0.00007702516,0.000005721456,0.000012574828,0.067861065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99799335,0.0006272821,0.00044473598,0.00050906115,0.00034284694,7.238837e-7,8.0340794e-7,0.0000056497584,0.00007554776],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975836,0.00038640568,0.00081276556,0.00013861111,0.00074439886,0.0003342012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969621,0.0016792413,0.00061330263,0.00008016812,0.00056547817,0.000099766585],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013785155,0.00010004045,0.000265563,0.00042287886,0.0004236377,0.0074405526,0.0008681289,0.00072240253,0.000013500569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03111912,0.000074895885,0.00008328903,0.00075035036,0.00016312322,0.027764922,0.00020880948,0.011410879,5.043753e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033515018,0.000014594763,0.7891785,0.000020063975,0.000034831486,0.0000071167547,0.025404777,0.0000056756776,0.0002829216,0.116711244,0.00078401266,0.06752278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012629791,0.00006398325,0.10703245,0.0041805734,0.00008273986,0.00005951265,0.6054656,0.0005167632,0.00040167142,0.17037752,0.11022346,0.00033278446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011349798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001663065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.682146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013338684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054098794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9935898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409903247","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-1118","title":"Artificial Intelligence and Academic Integrity: Legislate or Educate?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Data integrity; Psychology; Computer science; Business; Computer security; Social psychology","score_opus":0.32296186760912754,"score_gpt":0.4650092711528925,"score_spread":0.14204740354376494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409903247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80792034,0.0034562582,0.0075829946,0.17547758,0.003087829,0.00022223433,0.0000015174045,0.000027397946,0.0022238824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883875,0.0011767382,0.0038814223,0.0041387905,0.0014182063,0.0000038076207,0.000002215163,0.000013069877,0.0009782331],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764246,0.00010911477,0.0012506905,0.00021205643,0.00048884,0.00029683852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996546,0.0005097012,0.00044330486,0.00019446433,0.0019889025,0.000317652],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038927365,0.00014178503,0.0003562047,0.0008223979,0.00020503225,0.0039513083,0.0003379109,0.00039912493,0.00009465356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017321974,0.00010521938,0.000091844886,0.00089423254,0.000109275614,0.01818365,0.00008513121,0.005215366,0.0000110355],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064366404,0.00014498254,0.04414253,0.0001555283,0.0000825088,0.00004473816,0.0030243313,0.0000058197766,0.002180224,0.011985622,0.010335171,0.92725486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030148763,0.0027569786,0.05770425,0.009626475,0.0009684307,0.003580882,0.09215077,0.001377103,0.10560079,0.581555,0.14341809,0.0009597196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003012221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046068617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92629516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024740718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023094465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409903256","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-1117","title":"Attitudes Toward Academic Integrity: The Relationship Between Demographic Features, Peer Norms, Learning Profiles, Rates of Academic Misconduct, and Various Attitudes","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Academic integrity; Psychology; Social psychology; Research integrity; Peer review; Public relations; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.09570081193200937,"score_gpt":0.3752995323888215,"score_spread":0.27959872045681217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409903256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86930096,0.01892894,0.00045504552,0.10731005,0.0006013629,0.00029152934,0.000014425455,0.00004365554,0.0030540037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99295574,0.0019639921,0.0010564981,0.0007401228,0.0009612408,0.0000046712303,0.000010594987,0.00001653609,0.002290596],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99442375,0.0016990966,0.0011992432,0.0003101927,0.0018507756,0.00051692524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98963034,0.00648273,0.0012619403,0.00017360055,0.0021967327,0.0002546629],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.029189026,0.00024871185,0.00055626885,0.0008158363,0.0014307505,0.0045181857,0.0019270057,0.002590954,0.00002271211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.085338876,0.00017776965,0.00020618807,0.0014708628,0.000735983,0.024826033,0.0002894047,0.046981946,0.0000018998478],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003243101,0.000013907937,0.9251637,0.00008365746,0.00015802713,0.000003751093,0.0097935535,0.0000079993515,0.00023492206,0.05063208,0.011078693,0.0027973072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039830914,0.000052658168,0.9275175,0.0010446585,0.00019222981,0.000027888545,0.010152303,0.0000027011893,0.00016185475,0.03495059,0.02530649,0.00019286141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019675966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022604737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12365476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020424165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013759019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998692},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4413142669","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-0102","title":"Scholarly Publishing in the Era of Open Access and Generative Artificial Intelligence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Generative grammar; Publishing; Generative model; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; History; Data science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.24696849052453124,"score_gpt":0.44259023352641413,"score_spread":0.1956217430018829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413142669","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0773997,0.0018717635,0.4927803,0.40941527,0.0007795043,0.0006221227,0.000008248076,0.00001663621,0.017106446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93441194,0.0010128557,0.058869924,0.005266744,0.00023986193,0.000015589085,0.0000037038606,0.000011124633,0.00016822852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945393,0.0014767587,0.0011235141,0.00048187736,0.0019724816,0.00040602652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99308515,0.0017101142,0.0012357936,0.0009938905,0.002822798,0.00015225892],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03785676,0.00016748413,0.0003537466,0.001363651,0.00035397828,0.81366205,0.03087614,0.00013697684,0.000008068537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056286078,0.00012068211,0.000069383605,0.0039933566,0.000106985186,0.9406013,0.011012909,0.0050590304,7.8993327e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060167735,0.00016444073,0.0109066805,0.00004185772,0.00009252262,0.000095879026,0.0014127282,0.00013187426,0.0006628286,0.80252165,0.007665408,0.17624399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017001797,0.0006538602,0.17377011,0.0020564029,0.00011140603,0.00018168875,0.013005869,0.011404281,0.0059752385,0.6985505,0.091782495,0.00080793956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006871957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023366985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8570123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014417557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085227104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413142673","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-0100","title":"Productivity and Publishing Trends of Previously and Newly Established Centrally Funded Universities of India","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Innovations in Educational Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Publishing; Regional science; Library science; Geography; Political science; Agricultural economics; Business; Economic geography; Economic growth; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.02895143079915214,"score_gpt":0.3357141855299689,"score_spread":0.30676275473081677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413142673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.936498,0.001188387,0.00067854964,0.024186634,0.0011496983,0.00010711964,0.00001001407,0.000012168755,0.036169466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96162313,0.00011071491,0.036466893,0.00013941167,0.0003538242,9.0289325e-7,0.000002720439,0.000007344446,0.0012950506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973136,0.0006592376,0.0006905453,0.00019265602,0.00088355364,0.00026038112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937892,0.00080281094,0.0011570049,0.00017312758,0.003947878,0.00013001263],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012969585,0.00010927917,0.00034495015,0.0016354212,0.0003807051,0.01009145,0.0006864375,0.00020737639,0.000025971269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021749306,0.000109634704,0.00006374783,0.0026225664,0.00041490077,0.092676684,0.0001756998,0.0010332231,2.5241665e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012329334,0.0002444066,0.35932264,0.00020699318,0.00024982018,0.0000042458028,0.045329545,0.000022408189,0.001738919,0.4504321,0.011983375,0.13034226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012691326,0.00012964716,0.8388038,0.00060866534,0.00015734383,0.000018211456,0.08207307,0.000008601738,0.00072260055,0.036374696,0.03961166,0.00022254887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011714855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021152546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4794812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034894765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022857587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99093616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413142675","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-0119","title":"A Study on the Publication Performance of Preprints: A Case of BioRxiv","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.13551490046360595,"score_gpt":0.4075788009702694,"score_spread":0.2720639005066634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413142675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96491104,0.00010969999,0.00035814257,0.020314934,0.00049190747,0.0002480226,0.000006194058,0.000007461685,0.013552566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99835074,0.000011103392,0.00023123767,0.00066561264,0.00009447595,0.0000053300823,2.3022281e-7,0.000006503749,0.0006347927],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.993618,0.0008653582,0.0022830232,0.00033242942,0.0026917395,0.00020946156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98459536,0.0031439776,0.0031408875,0.0010211208,0.007979549,0.000119106066],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.057954885,0.00013249482,0.00044685748,0.001579282,0.00026079043,0.021980423,0.005734135,0.00018157739,0.00013377554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1602792,0.000074139694,0.00017953357,0.0037155324,0.000114823044,0.08500336,0.0006857798,0.0022147703,0.000010077459],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002573088,0.00071250816,0.84892404,0.000019757887,0.00020400947,0.00005628424,0.0042639826,0.00014853277,0.0009943849,0.00696171,0.09702125,0.040436257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002684129,0.00081356824,0.9013908,0.0008127863,0.00016685067,0.00051249715,0.05825287,0.0010930457,0.0074610715,0.01194729,0.014543935,0.0003211762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009825852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007527488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.102324314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009297222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054446014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413142681","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-0027","title":"Use of ResearchGate and Academia.edu by Austrian Professors from Business Administration","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Business Strategy and Innovation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Business; Business management; Business administration; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.09136348338353019,"score_gpt":0.30139800932246275,"score_spread":0.21003452593893257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413142681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95250624,0.0003258278,0.000850608,0.04348731,0.0005872607,0.0001400558,0.000009843261,0.00001907811,0.0020738011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996999,0.00006137334,0.00054217613,0.0012777615,0.00061690115,0.0000022525562,0.000056061814,0.000013192633,0.00043127334],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981003,0.00004434028,0.0008373438,0.00018234127,0.0006317421,0.00020397684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99440366,0.00015015411,0.0011076219,0.00014643258,0.004169777,0.000022333108],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023693258,0.0001409528,0.0002776762,0.00082215294,0.00020782533,0.016740086,0.00042207114,0.00042966832,0.000037689333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006535957,0.00012406746,0.000042640637,0.002124549,0.00007817253,0.13764128,0.00016926562,0.001864628,0.0000018132082],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014947958,0.00040760753,0.47979924,0.0008607837,0.0003640317,0.00003868376,0.0001514836,0.000112940455,0.07547367,0.08796678,0.30251905,0.050810948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021818527,0.00004028651,0.82182753,0.0014736508,0.00018223994,0.0000071479603,0.0008658381,0.00052718056,0.0028096137,0.018660363,0.15109418,0.000330138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007111068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034817585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3420283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046540797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98428065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413142684","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-0141","title":"Scott Norton. <i>Developmental Editing: A Handbook for Freelancers, Authors, and Publishers</i>, 2nd ed.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06128751130673387,"score_gpt":0.35985569418747637,"score_spread":0.2985681828807425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413142684","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42917442,0.05457142,0.1266216,0.24001493,0.0342742,0.0020870324,0.0002715415,0.00028576373,0.11269909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8138555,0.00051867496,0.10886703,0.019409388,0.008736622,0.00006697935,0.000052585543,0.00013138846,0.04836183],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923611,0.00034872716,0.0024207383,0.00075288996,0.0034013088,0.000715218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887582,0.0028191782,0.0020993738,0.0004371305,0.005234025,0.0006520876],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03462769,0.00033153084,0.0008225122,0.0018896145,0.0009062962,0.22684374,0.005718372,0.0006471238,0.00014737481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.129041,0.00025352236,0.00029806918,0.002055299,0.00019817163,0.26457334,0.0010749643,0.003592611,0.0000059995077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009693678,0.000036357385,0.07927501,0.000017894154,0.00009859865,0.000012710759,0.0006560615,0.000011460114,0.00027702402,0.0013577974,0.8718891,0.04627104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023495066,0.000092397946,0.0148517145,0.00056149426,0.00006938341,0.00015635784,0.0076784873,0.00023382055,0.00040281037,0.03141152,0.94186395,0.00032855343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009525802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000043859793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38468108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039967985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016151383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413142685","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-0086","title":"Kelvin K. Droegemeier. <i>Demystifying the Academic Research Enterprise: Becoming a Successful Scholar in a Complex and Competitive Environment</i>.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Sociology; Management; Knowledge management; Industrial organization; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.090012015357763,"score_gpt":0.31382087636495604,"score_spread":0.22380886100719305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413142685","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79421955,0.0104793,0.00006140677,0.18653525,0.00026217088,0.00019054343,0.000009139341,0.000014355545,0.008228279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992629,0.003130829,0.00018382729,0.0012570554,0.000531055,0.0000090780295,0.0000026676194,0.000011625305,0.0022448425],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99691355,0.0006554411,0.00081866304,0.00024999914,0.0009359682,0.0004264022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978958,0.0008128027,0.00035420014,0.00014520081,0.0006656151,0.00012638229],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007221894,0.00016964598,0.0004346655,0.000484508,0.004506069,0.012553433,0.00091174355,0.00012674434,0.00024722025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002657229,0.000109186425,0.00016132455,0.00035123876,0.00044576533,0.016842484,0.0005431354,0.0055456683,0.0000060103753],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021495765,0.00037255159,0.1420301,0.00022019821,0.0010388241,0.00014514779,0.3939966,0.00007345494,0.0016305558,0.33709404,0.095012866,0.028170697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089260226,0.000062744715,0.011399582,0.00038428244,0.000091735186,0.000008311751,0.09511737,0.00007901662,0.000006846791,0.013627536,0.87815404,0.0001759153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000545888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041376968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7831412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015309965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005669179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413142716","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-0059","title":"Development, Reliability, and Validity of the DIP-DIP Scale for Quick Diagnosis of Predatory Journals","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Viral Infections and Vectors","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Scale (ratio); Psychology; Geography; Cartography; Physics","score_opus":0.05936149075966334,"score_gpt":0.3291809640079123,"score_spread":0.26981947324824895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413142716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99140024,0.0009851097,0.0007057694,0.0054802396,0.00059894397,0.00025080828,0.000013329991,0.0000057111947,0.00055982656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943268,0.00018385237,0.0047965595,0.00028519006,0.00015371597,0.0000072218404,8.047327e-7,0.000009741136,0.00023615682],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980539,0.00013788101,0.0010083804,0.00012781078,0.00051326805,0.00015875456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961149,0.00041038918,0.0008839831,0.00023136889,0.0022288577,0.00013046584],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005492319,0.00010675176,0.00044547048,0.00038245737,0.00019913219,0.00116359,0.0003007691,0.00016816094,0.000029308403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010220549,0.00006895507,0.00024127029,0.0005222769,0.000097174896,0.008957355,0.0001656409,0.0009525313,1.11284315e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010749965,0.00023697512,0.9809375,0.00033371043,0.00012678828,7.832646e-7,0.00037189157,0.0000102334625,0.004833242,0.00010157631,0.008473906,0.00446594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015388908,0.00030505905,0.92714304,0.001625775,0.0002455733,0.000047591013,0.00046232645,0.000016896021,0.030564317,0.0012288027,0.036746357,0.00007539907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003547918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024142002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053794444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014603988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061365933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413142718","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2023-0068","title":"Sue Greener and Joe Martelli. <i>An Introduction to Business Research Methods</i>, 4th ed.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Business Strategies and Management Research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Architectural engineering; Engineering; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.23605804565283398,"score_gpt":0.514914703432395,"score_spread":0.27885665777956103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413142718","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2416076,0.0022151154,0.17334956,0.5604113,0.003859246,0.00049499737,0.000004053394,0.00003598246,0.018022196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6782773,0.0019620168,0.24927011,0.0068877605,0.014356037,0.000042134452,0.000013288498,0.00010764519,0.049083684],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914018,0.0019600792,0.001177665,0.0006615325,0.004184534,0.0006144095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9791407,0.0015408813,0.000379782,0.0008448816,0.017660508,0.00043323188],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.083755575,0.00017114652,0.00045058146,0.003968733,0.00067757454,0.094605744,0.002634229,0.00019198621,0.00022833099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058362015,0.00012135055,0.00008478119,0.007862651,0.00016761624,0.082602344,0.0012611148,0.00223675,0.000016603364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021112866,0.0001085641,0.006241185,0.00003639567,0.000052633102,0.00003614707,0.00026102984,0.00041389975,0.0052149165,0.03324102,0.57703197,0.37715113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047464174,0.00014661002,0.10291045,0.00007360215,0.00001883108,0.000046460595,0.0044658766,0.00017254855,0.00026147472,0.060792986,0.8304931,0.00014341014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005534336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012017702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5535235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015717532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053841417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.971769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413142724","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2025-0007","title":"Nicholas Dames. <i>The Chapter: A Segmented History from Antiquity to the Twenty-First Century</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Late Antiquity; Ancient history; History; Classics; Geography","score_opus":0.026593257365849998,"score_gpt":0.2929982134346095,"score_spread":0.2664049560687595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413142724","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.117940776,0.010262554,0.0009670148,0.69455194,0.0138662495,0.0004183123,0.000016303744,0.00006378916,0.16191302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91822046,0.0038213485,0.0005607902,0.06520818,0.0017423821,0.000009758239,0.00000289562,0.000016312295,0.010417846],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750996,0.00037756356,0.00053942966,0.0001768592,0.0011025913,0.00029360477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972591,0.0004663532,0.00046479795,0.0003263367,0.0012379916,0.00024543618],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045228656,0.00012150546,0.00020151901,0.00018094495,0.0015126211,0.012678923,0.0018457999,0.00016750436,0.00023626378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050801337,0.000077852754,0.00032187405,0.0005454671,0.00014784014,0.018063592,0.00021309056,0.0022011686,0.000027885857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034191286,0.00010766095,0.0048771664,0.0000032861033,0.0001441356,0.000005207123,0.0322627,0.000016198004,0.00039042108,0.028750708,0.9255746,0.0078337025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022927865,0.00001939557,0.00325672,0.00015070481,0.000047610138,0.0000029869423,0.023500238,0.0000060378725,0.000018904188,0.0008840367,0.97180665,0.00007747107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043649324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020396963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80027974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010502636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008690073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413142742","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-0051","title":"Mapping Gender History in Medieval and Renaissance Studies from Bibliographic Data","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Reformation and Early Modern Christianity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Renaissance; History; Art history","score_opus":0.20895898158560336,"score_gpt":0.30003398971596545,"score_spread":0.0910750081303621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413142742","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71236265,0.22242194,0.00075453613,0.010990698,0.00485688,0.00013535474,0.00005940583,0.000047108602,0.048371423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992816,0.0036322535,0.00057020446,0.0018812797,0.0006649463,0.0000010392155,0.000013315,0.00000870023,0.00041228763],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845123,0.00013242265,0.00063768297,0.00017160871,0.00044561437,0.00016144854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998323,0.0001751991,0.00039199874,0.0002686285,0.0007648453,0.000076334654],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030322995,0.00011179128,0.00028263283,0.0028310113,0.00019269517,0.00749039,0.0007004542,0.00007147382,0.00013348974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018702082,0.000087797365,0.0000465541,0.00034986174,0.00016979378,0.063026875,0.00029800835,0.001101003,0.0000017724318],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000900375,0.00011532719,0.053654652,0.00022442694,0.0005954906,0.000063252664,0.108644314,0.000008067985,0.00019044756,0.018375628,0.7996756,0.018362787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008989378,0.000020110252,0.06479221,0.00053105113,0.000035160545,0.000006918724,0.02757878,0.00021591019,0.000002990913,0.01226201,0.89351237,0.00014356585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005632932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079731975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28045332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014468156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001409147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9935399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416659214","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2025-0015","title":"ChatGPT Revolution in Education: Trends, Opportunities, and Research Hot Spots—A Bibliometric Perspective","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Citation analysis; Citation; Bibliometrics; Web of science; Higher education","score_opus":0.3474875855454548,"score_gpt":0.4973465550700225,"score_spread":0.14985896952456773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416659214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7835457,0.033985022,0.000064028776,0.15787451,0.001363165,0.00016384941,0.0000015325506,0.000010464007,0.022991754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875232,0.0063978117,0.0008207869,0.0010676291,0.00090488174,0.000008260893,0.0000053257863,0.000009313382,0.0032628165],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773055,0.00026971637,0.0007095347,0.00019376032,0.00081581395,0.00028063968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919155,0.00043439306,0.00025874437,0.00019523162,0.006920176,0.00027592023],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008209905,0.00008818761,0.00024734024,0.058152083,0.00020996977,0.0037254426,0.00021315081,0.0002082179,0.00007012794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015108865,0.00008101102,0.000056258694,0.035048597,0.00008870232,0.01875266,0.000060545535,0.0022204432,0.000002147645],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024874136,0.00037351312,0.110923745,0.000107337386,0.000032747696,0.0000291425,0.0041087633,0.0000011411482,0.00020005177,0.021532793,0.05746325,0.8049788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002675972,0.00046098058,0.73331815,0.0016956914,0.000050183233,0.00029673555,0.13317367,0.00004519493,0.00035803686,0.022098074,0.10811041,0.00012528744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025826006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000079177786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8048535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012809483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037632408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7105993594","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-0060","title":"Standardizing Preprint Policies Are Needed to Clarify What Counts as a Prior Publication","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Preprint; Ambiguity; Dissemination; Peer review; Server; Publishing; Pace","score_opus":0.08118027071584988,"score_gpt":0.41610448045462645,"score_spread":0.33492420973877657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7105993594","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33324593,0.0021084999,0.013969197,0.5479011,0.004219471,0.00036115243,0.000015798189,0.000073917465,0.09810495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9329372,0.00014484144,0.0032967643,0.050835926,0.00087687024,0.000008974453,0.0000029407367,0.000023313745,0.011873188],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938344,0.00033915005,0.0014693572,0.0004101713,0.0035822322,0.00036473974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98780334,0.0009587967,0.0015418947,0.00067393464,0.008609283,0.00041276906],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.025293827,0.00016554352,0.0004404821,0.0019689645,0.0003926018,0.2482587,0.004925698,0.0005359171,0.00028214348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15405835,0.00012578405,0.00018446341,0.0030774272,0.000048166843,0.20600715,0.0009080573,0.0035782387,0.00015461717],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063982596,0.00003193,0.014690446,0.000006468577,0.000049806597,0.000007036113,0.0015877435,0.000077142635,0.00031072748,0.008563389,0.85310346,0.12150785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000430022,0.000033937227,0.020354275,0.0004753122,0.00002026425,0.000042386982,0.016449941,0.00006306891,0.00058038783,0.027204964,0.9341841,0.00016137889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016261957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012430909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5996913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042289277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010458874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106008996","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-0091","title":"Anne Massey. <i>Writing and Publishing in Architecture and Design</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Architecture, Modernity, and Design","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Architecture; Project commissioning","score_opus":0.018861669486537787,"score_gpt":0.2263894409289644,"score_spread":0.20752777144242662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106008996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56184924,0.031886235,0.38989198,0.006805667,0.0006342046,0.00026498828,0.0000070025962,0.00014524802,0.008515455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9655789,0.00034719985,0.032844674,0.00082237914,0.00031633783,0.0000034273812,0.0000014791303,0.000036003246,0.000049588547],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997947,0.00020805195,0.00071548333,0.0002283641,0.00047560644,0.0004255062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984164,0.00068070134,0.0001737037,0.00017254028,0.00032362022,0.00023298626],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004350794,0.00024129685,0.0004112074,0.0012408033,0.00017647562,0.028894398,0.0005058516,0.00030351777,0.0000044385038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036034924,0.00022302347,0.00006572447,0.00063173834,0.000054132786,0.044021174,0.00017542622,0.003596226,2.5220692e-7],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003715302,0.00014270711,0.16375664,0.0013041648,0.0005008872,0.0007107308,0.010824073,0.10075997,0.033190943,0.00400081,0.042156443,0.6422811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018041091,0.0008212931,0.40482062,0.009369598,0.0004954428,0.0042311107,0.009154741,0.09090503,0.007986126,0.38269472,0.0679256,0.0035546038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003364186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003125021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6387265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011258085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010961211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987025},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W7106013739","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-0088","title":"Richard N. Landers and Tara S. Behrend. <i>Research Methods for Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Science and Practice</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Industrial relations; Field (mathematics); Work (physics); Organizational behavior","score_opus":0.18553282780264127,"score_gpt":0.5415142406381015,"score_spread":0.35598141283546025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106013739","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07864238,0.078758165,0.17056015,0.44184223,0.014846364,0.0013123171,0.000033012857,0.00007952532,0.21392584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.692154,0.0034027067,0.26099622,0.036181338,0.004306519,0.00005264012,0.00000595017,0.00009415793,0.0028064684],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997104,0.0008797616,0.0005308157,0.0005101757,0.0005589395,0.00041629418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919995,0.0037178427,0.00038532447,0.00018737416,0.0034322331,0.0002777329],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02582933,0.00013590194,0.0003195327,0.0012091656,0.0006923363,0.003054604,0.00061584706,0.0005354575,0.000042318676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056553878,0.00012124331,0.00003121655,0.0015097188,0.0013567811,0.013105979,0.00026806243,0.0032862043,9.253938e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014357939,0.00024559398,0.021192608,0.00002090554,0.00033479705,0.000019400495,0.006811932,3.8221458e-7,0.004797878,0.26466465,0.5213418,0.17913428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0054362565,0.0006768844,0.025616331,0.00006311298,0.00014697516,0.0011327503,0.008775481,0.000016129456,0.000026336964,0.09608046,0.861805,0.00022425735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023607525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.245262e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6135116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024317908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047364912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99901325},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W7106013788","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-0126","title":"Monica Berger. <i>Predatory Publishing and Global Scholarly Communications</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Electronic publishing","score_opus":0.05732703431225584,"score_gpt":0.26395970850228184,"score_spread":0.206632674190026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106013788","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1880044,0.021190772,0.00008052037,0.04021953,0.0023721163,0.00019412598,0.00015351443,0.000115075396,0.74766994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808243,0.0004190882,0.001060573,0.007015841,0.0009020671,0.000006318816,0.000021493861,0.00002837017,0.00972193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996595,0.0002922894,0.0012517115,0.00030859432,0.0010724743,0.000479913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934675,0.0004333553,0.000813955,0.00084033475,0.004100586,0.00034427934],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005196858,0.00029406592,0.00049384974,0.0005860547,0.0013815777,0.37966606,0.0032485127,0.0002725618,0.00020471698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072199693,0.00026769403,0.00025467091,0.0003343623,0.000503826,0.39945954,0.0012041554,0.0036994857,0.000008603701],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005941743,0.00014673336,0.011481254,0.000060483075,0.00022046878,0.000021680173,0.0031728733,0.0000014536827,0.000030937023,0.8662992,0.08566268,0.03284281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095129723,0.00009922775,0.0053316774,0.00045147652,0.00009295193,0.00005369734,0.009993897,0.000015091397,0.000008921056,0.060921438,0.92181593,0.0002643723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026471226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054369925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83615327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003565369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053873815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106023881","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2025-0047","title":"Why the Current Model of Academic Publishing Is Ethically Flawed—and What We Can Do to Change It","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Profit (economics); Value (mathematics); Project commissioning; Profit motive; Public good","score_opus":0.21131941598898712,"score_gpt":0.4274791089024255,"score_spread":0.2161596929134384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106023881","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06612447,0.027505033,0.008556922,0.8922287,0.0031846461,0.00037447797,0.000040344166,0.000022980636,0.0019623872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8118302,0.0098112095,0.002126925,0.17369054,0.0015940313,0.000024687772,0.0000028165548,0.00004423693,0.00087532675],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871945,0.0009958615,0.0032112477,0.00082561653,0.0069942153,0.00077855797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98337156,0.004395013,0.0026879793,0.0010246537,0.00767307,0.0008477412],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06060904,0.00037843312,0.00092945184,0.0024708176,0.0006839348,0.28025982,0.0133590875,0.00093920046,0.00006202166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12976244,0.00023543056,0.0003517904,0.0045303395,0.00024641978,0.39381158,0.003051253,0.015508509,0.00000487687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059369675,0.000025349684,0.0043278607,0.000024377645,0.000050546216,0.0000027604067,0.012726419,0.0002346533,0.0001292187,0.0045824805,0.56719375,0.4106432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010251119,0.00008515432,0.004080406,0.0032930477,0.00012002502,0.000043830772,0.018242441,0.0048311464,0.00024696084,0.16906796,0.7985341,0.00042982696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017785504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000087338245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7457057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027962727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013487411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9919791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106029949","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2025-0005","title":"A Trioethnographic Exploration of Co-Authoring in Higher Education: Perspectives of a PhD Student, a Supervisor, and an Editor","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogic; Publishing; Power (physics); Affect (linguistics); Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory; Key (lock)","score_opus":0.34865510700356034,"score_gpt":0.5486301392797915,"score_spread":0.1999750322762312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106029949","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9528887,0.0076407855,0.000077623146,0.030773032,0.004975833,0.00027007592,0.000006677506,0.000009664164,0.0033575566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99501777,0.00091081095,0.0009404294,0.00019657347,0.0023036613,0.000025356883,0.0000035819621,0.00000946953,0.0005923517],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977051,0.0005379819,0.0009910036,0.00015520147,0.00043147805,0.00017922309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99636745,0.00030581965,0.0007255708,0.00018171848,0.0022836183,0.00013582756],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030330732,0.00009892342,0.00032541575,0.0012297767,0.00025179965,0.00058668765,0.00032670336,0.00020982533,0.0001025143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013793581,0.00009005105,0.00007319165,0.00087433273,0.00006575523,0.031143708,0.000067039175,0.0014517248,3.8836478e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002125244,0.0027268925,0.605189,0.00064363383,0.00017778478,0.0000013763113,0.2605746,0.000024656118,0.0018371997,0.09718887,0.024508104,0.006915353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012487608,0.00019919733,0.50231355,0.0012170898,0.000045209483,9.007675e-7,0.46799496,0.000008806873,0.0000126938885,0.0048722476,0.02199505,0.00009151999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002327614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012783954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20742036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018030034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013351624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9824072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106034893","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-0049","title":"An Empirical Study of International Retracted Research Articles of Famous Chinese Universities from 2012 to 2022","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Citation; Academic dishonesty; Ranking (information retrieval); Publishing; Empirical research; Scientific misconduct; Quality (philosophy); Academic integrity","score_opus":0.07012572944052395,"score_gpt":0.422144762125753,"score_spread":0.35201903268522905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106034893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97537607,0.0001862841,0.00019028026,0.015003022,0.0006780205,0.000103230865,0.000023397919,0.000007796963,0.008431923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997892,0.000036020367,0.0005862086,0.00020489289,0.00045099406,4.6167239e-7,0.0000024290991,0.000003928377,0.00082305796],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99542254,0.001439201,0.0005770141,0.00014079991,0.0022079432,0.00021248781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99370056,0.001104919,0.00034073045,0.00014282174,0.0045277034,0.00018329071],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014912013,0.00006998151,0.00024153644,0.0011081652,0.0003124764,0.0024127413,0.0016145117,0.00045763867,0.00027545405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011738339,0.000060970266,0.000068955625,0.0015224683,0.00013911873,0.030514542,0.00019440525,0.004861398,0.0000014940018],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051881815,0.0007403609,0.8232947,0.0000061070527,0.00018779251,0.000027245267,0.13786744,0.000054916123,0.0056668967,0.0020496082,0.025267757,0.004318351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005799704,0.00029193578,0.62657565,0.00009953555,0.000022807335,0.0000012081442,0.355366,0.000054615848,0.00018806476,0.0050614025,0.011692849,0.00006597917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011340471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025850146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21749856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030875904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084563525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99862283},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W7106036494","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-0104","title":"Creating an Internationally Equitable Playing Field for Publishing in English-Language Scholarly Journals","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Disadvantage; Field (mathematics); Lingua franca; English language","score_opus":0.06063961453109059,"score_gpt":0.3155565163390516,"score_spread":0.254916901807961,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106036494","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7518337,0.008157555,0.0059631346,0.04056897,0.005497555,0.0005277366,0.000070809125,0.00019271197,0.18718785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982089,0.00007991048,0.0081380205,0.0037370967,0.0031324832,0.000027121418,0.00006301891,0.00005052238,0.002682857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99458826,0.0006073123,0.0021440622,0.00042062037,0.001463854,0.0007759007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98588765,0.0023444537,0.0016839586,0.0006620118,0.009103578,0.00031834998],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.025840847,0.0003320663,0.0006356491,0.003134025,0.0014627125,0.40460238,0.0042523285,0.00043328814,0.00027946482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10116749,0.00031548488,0.0003261787,0.0006498075,0.000071807386,0.52890563,0.0005770911,0.0063628047,0.0000017437009],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00070794433,0.00092830067,0.063399635,0.0002593015,0.00059582724,0.00007552398,0.24738811,0.0004210719,0.005814504,0.5067808,0.06042052,0.11320846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0151895005,0.0015911116,0.022703461,0.009957681,0.0004393442,0.0001310633,0.3455867,0.005307759,0.0012835532,0.11551957,0.4801419,0.0021483805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010571327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001740759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41972136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006360412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008378559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106039363","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-0134","title":"Research Persistence: A Comparative Study of Core and Peripheral Journal Authors in Five Medical Research Topics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Core (optical fiber); Publication; Medical research; Scientific publishing; Bibliometrics; Impact factor; Original research","score_opus":0.8119967163500094,"score_gpt":0.654563852756843,"score_spread":0.15743286359316633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106039363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9706863,0.0035966854,0.000100613244,0.017931616,0.000727195,0.00027018494,0.0000030376902,0.0000018284876,0.0066824937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995714,0.00034204056,0.0005867796,0.0000651233,0.0002562222,0.000002985122,2.0016485e-7,0.0000057938864,0.0030268633],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.94131804,0.00670047,0.0029722068,0.00068113935,0.047179017,0.0011491228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8936763,0.023244089,0.0011347285,0.0007912226,0.079507746,0.0016459537],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.34183863,0.00014210526,0.0007618821,0.102906086,0.0009125793,0.061636783,0.0062667946,0.00037800116,0.00036281918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.40150797,0.00009495943,0.0001551258,0.14430156,0.0006969302,0.02667822,0.002302063,0.011607536,0.0000030255885],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033743723,0.0012232228,0.8385067,0.00001822838,0.00009954311,0.0004281186,0.021348752,0.000086689695,0.00012604981,0.0023546834,0.073616214,0.061854366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032840297,0.002518901,0.57569855,0.00036674272,0.000009660832,0.00021699812,0.37906048,0.0032127867,0.000030304027,0.022020908,0.013445868,0.0001347966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039594472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003131515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35771173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006752396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032270763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106039481","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-0093","title":"Confidentiality, Peer Review, and the Submission Case Database","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Accountability; Harm; Constructive; Focus (optics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.040421936073048594,"score_gpt":0.35548525284433696,"score_spread":0.31506331677128835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106039481","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019227453,0.046985973,0.0018900629,0.8571988,0.0014517009,0.00027710808,0.000024028097,0.000016659016,0.07292826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.876449,0.030473292,0.0013731577,0.056627546,0.0019880298,0.000004431458,0.000010242356,0.000013496084,0.033060797],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99653894,0.0012714812,0.0005317384,0.00011149524,0.0013563735,0.00018995037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99462605,0.00097468134,0.00044521102,0.00014903556,0.00363295,0.0001721038],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06021591,0.0000762559,0.0002549996,0.00014510281,0.000977006,0.013726838,0.00072450005,0.00037429773,0.00015477171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07970546,0.00004763116,0.00009632886,0.0004239686,0.0002977303,0.03417159,0.00018735073,0.0054773777,0.0000016768136],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005060098,0.00001785362,0.0014998848,0.00011594329,0.00006810832,0.00023414544,0.0066400515,2.1562855e-7,0.000041258234,0.20149763,0.7828009,0.007033382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008483263,0.000007732094,0.00024952233,0.000950783,0.00026988558,0.00064595434,0.011763031,0.0000070952296,0.000019935012,0.017450573,0.96770906,0.00007811193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056688837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039321123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85722154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007687451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005062572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99681705},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W7106039980","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2025-0014","title":"Study on the Funding Characteristics of English-language Sci-Tech Journals Published in China: Implementation of the China Sci-Tech Journal Excellence Action Plan-II","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; China; Action plan; Action (physics); Foundation (evidence); Citation; Investment (military)","score_opus":0.3569589056399203,"score_gpt":0.5259805209338575,"score_spread":0.16902161529393722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106039980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98491174,0.0005752018,0.00067522604,0.00819069,0.0038618294,0.0005359118,0.00003057845,0.00000656102,0.0012122581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987601,0.00023024737,0.00015414918,0.000118782504,0.00052419206,0.000004926108,9.555185e-7,0.000015174842,0.00019144495],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97692543,0.0020466137,0.0040249242,0.0005061068,0.01574272,0.0007542088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9756377,0.003861807,0.0057799267,0.0009659411,0.01342721,0.0003274214],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.14846939,0.00026852396,0.0007864178,0.049448345,0.0012373668,0.057834566,0.00789932,0.00023736255,0.00038862927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24726947,0.000140994,0.0004205925,0.09081692,0.00016766104,0.04116985,0.0015663625,0.005229678,0.0000013862231],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014169664,0.0006740823,0.91284186,0.000017357565,0.000114489914,0.000031724416,0.011047867,0.000059600065,0.010006522,0.00033391803,0.007884063,0.05684683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014100502,0.00054596324,0.93115747,0.00033689517,0.000034075067,0.000045066783,0.058863018,0.00007294091,0.0041317088,0.0025574223,0.00072019745,0.00012522071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022872767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006382882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09880008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006179604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013369075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106048093","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-0087","title":"Stephen Pinfield. <i>Achieving Global Open Access: The Need for Scientific, Epistemic, and Participatory Openness</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizen journalism; Participatory action research; Global South; Participatory development","score_opus":0.27772363632721875,"score_gpt":0.48882369760260347,"score_spread":0.21110006127538472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106048093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6183072,0.0065438515,0.024260635,0.3054632,0.0077004,0.0013367223,0.000087568995,0.000038655726,0.03626182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839402,0.00003868678,0.00177287,0.010247612,0.00052907673,0.000029744848,0.0000033041424,0.0000151054055,0.003423419],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99306303,0.0008529492,0.0021893992,0.00071771356,0.0025659867,0.00061091204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868233,0.0046807798,0.002199278,0.0009760663,0.0048919637,0.00042858493],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07188216,0.0002452029,0.0006957555,0.0005995456,0.0018509593,0.55141604,0.024857333,0.000334454,0.00006675177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10532654,0.00014706138,0.00022864091,0.003114155,0.00032708832,0.29846883,0.007516672,0.0020799097,0.00000393691],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002060011,0.00005565783,0.24020886,0.000023669289,0.00011578878,0.00000748855,0.0006632338,0.00007812565,0.00024779368,0.030396415,0.649161,0.07883598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026951544,0.00008307174,0.09203917,0.00058568077,0.00016846514,0.00009497885,0.010073955,0.00070433185,0.00021586096,0.27275017,0.6202058,0.0003833772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022615326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012631789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.365633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021618042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00157384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W758976860","doi":"10.3138/jsp.46.4.02","title":"Beyond the Monograph: Publishing Research for Multimedia and Multiplatform Delivery","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Library Collection Development and Digital Resources","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; Oregon Arts Commission","keywords":"Popularity; Publishing; Computer science; Electronic publishing; World Wide Web; Order (exchange); Social media; Multimedia; Mobile device; Content delivery; The Internet; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.1416454877539777,"score_gpt":0.3034957658782058,"score_spread":0.16185027812422811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W758976860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7964958,0.01016769,0.038289785,0.110376,0.003732416,0.0009028571,0.000010384876,0.00017538281,0.039849672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8334185,0.000109896,0.16192532,0.0019497314,0.0011532976,0.000019734827,0.000003614222,0.000026421743,0.0013935249],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99687934,0.00015398572,0.0005614988,0.0002477457,0.0017200274,0.00043740936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935259,0.0016781993,0.00037369062,0.0002734871,0.0036164941,0.0005322264],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012738941,0.00013359495,0.000196692,0.001138595,0.0006237986,0.17522699,0.002571312,0.00016225761,0.0000021413946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014746738,0.00008738696,0.00010863321,0.0017385752,0.0001061277,0.34224308,0.00087851007,0.0015777857,0.0000017987197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002186942,0.000112327114,0.032819115,0.000024472998,0.00015454063,0.000037981023,0.0144323595,0.000055971836,0.00020076298,0.021389425,0.60390276,0.3266516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005485733,0.00073445315,0.0192716,0.00014957822,0.00002036964,0.0003682626,0.0091454955,0.022947617,0.0008256455,0.17503591,0.76550657,0.00050880207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030751155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008791977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32614282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010884344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068624795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99355245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W80742967","doi":"","title":"Writing Science in Plain English by Anne E. Greene (review)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plain English; Sociology; Linguistics; Library science; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020702839373700505,"score_gpt":0.2603668611499332,"score_spread":0.23966402177623267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W80742967","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36946428,0.118857585,0.00016340587,0.016452491,0.002797154,0.00020298194,0.000026189478,0.00006789522,0.491968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920517,0.0012992112,0.0004183649,0.0029535955,0.002425408,0.0000026888083,0.0000034053653,0.000018884884,0.00082669716],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970364,0.00016558875,0.0008902602,0.0002193821,0.0012886513,0.00039969312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99596256,0.00022614087,0.0007176716,0.000229881,0.0027105878,0.00015318321],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.012960066,0.00015639921,0.00045636308,0.0006282586,0.0004623164,0.017331908,0.001227729,0.000042885567,0.00050913735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016833924,0.00012419547,0.00014301128,0.00036465662,0.00038362062,0.07020089,0.00019669566,0.0012329167,0.000006512338],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002859414,0.00040615606,0.020171843,0.0004488675,0.00023679592,0.000106533706,0.06259945,0.00004520292,0.00090403704,0.12061177,0.6488311,0.1456096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013851182,0.00025159202,0.0031154358,0.005119536,0.00021641055,0.000033549248,0.06065216,0.00013361342,0.00014306758,0.0024676993,0.9258644,0.00061744923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013188222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002286617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62258744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001289976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010494185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9914477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W848453311","doi":"10.3138/jsp.46.4.06","title":"Resolution or Revolution?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Resolution (logic); Computer science; Library science; Operations research; History; Data science; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.2620617101062811,"score_gpt":0.42224184684102023,"score_spread":0.16018013673473913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W848453311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5717274,0.00826879,0.065884955,0.19520207,0.014719121,0.00035679154,0.000029941204,0.00015171082,0.14365922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9689863,0.00004887721,0.014049021,0.0027037938,0.0030766393,0.00000173327,0.000002547608,0.000023504239,0.011107587],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98908556,0.00086858444,0.0020738705,0.00036569222,0.0071817096,0.00042458574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825987,0.0014306402,0.0024989054,0.00062362105,0.011866956,0.0009811468],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.07217352,0.00016466303,0.0004718287,0.0013427221,0.00028188634,0.11337447,0.006435881,0.00042226134,0.0001860306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36459264,0.00009965056,0.00019544625,0.0029789142,0.00009018466,0.3535739,0.00065436645,0.0033607823,0.00011603515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023255614,0.00004004326,0.030873254,0.0000015698032,0.00002125885,0.000055960783,0.0008382744,0.00026859008,0.000055314744,0.002601542,0.94109243,0.023919206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016209829,0.0002474556,0.022682782,0.00012091806,0.000029383425,0.00086445844,0.007217106,0.0007789323,0.000054523156,0.09223665,0.8739092,0.00023760162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000099490135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022244754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39725888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047636143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017055669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99893975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W854588002","doi":"10.3138/jsp.46.4.01","title":"Publishing Virtuously: Morals Matter in Building Better Books","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publicity; Prudence; Economic Justice; Quality (philosophy); Law; Sociology; Management; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06098583651059446,"score_gpt":0.3173222575111481,"score_spread":0.25633642100055365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W854588002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5195137,0.00074509426,0.0011861677,0.10753971,0.0017123454,0.00011382032,0.000010103492,0.00003265506,0.36914638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97628045,0.000012816078,0.007615435,0.01230363,0.0023662564,0.000001818243,0.0000017990563,0.000017165938,0.0014006565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99620503,0.00052163017,0.00077454885,0.00018470781,0.0017349937,0.0005790604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963568,0.0003492905,0.00064695766,0.00016460987,0.001807484,0.00067486195],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.010261889,0.00014456209,0.00033101422,0.00061237806,0.00032500498,0.04371995,0.0012113713,0.00025676787,0.00014083303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011426319,0.00013550447,0.00013130289,0.0006026593,0.00035350496,0.14469752,0.00016206759,0.0021348374,0.000021441372],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004121532,0.000064239495,0.2723171,0.000007852186,0.000042445237,0.00018678624,0.0047752713,0.00010561141,0.00022637726,0.58736086,0.1317525,0.0031197462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082120625,0.000050253668,0.011740203,0.00018941783,0.000024232766,0.000081513914,0.007387267,0.00000805399,0.000029326246,0.018985428,0.960421,0.00026205252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048687537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025894638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82866853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074829813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031515595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99690086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}