{"meta":{"query_hash":"d95011e36a98","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Science Communication"},"cohort_total":20,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":20,"exported":20,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/d95011e36a98","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Science+Communication"},"results":[{"id":"W2338204681","doi":"10.22323/2.12010202","title":"Newspaper portrayals of spinal manipulation therapy: Canada, United States, and the United Kingdom","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Framing (construction); Popularity; Spinal manipulation; Psychology; Medicine; Advertising; Political science; Alternative medicine; Social psychology; Chiropractic; Business; History","score_opus":0.03211741687856518,"score_gpt":0.30634267729447023,"score_spread":0.27422526041590506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338204681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93112177,0.0045453804,0.00010373057,0.009470939,0.0002806185,0.000046636535,0.0028090195,0.000026817297,0.05159509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99064505,0.0033302268,0.0000947417,0.0011604638,0.00012317163,0.000013213901,0.00048387964,0.000021271506,0.004127947],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975491,0.00048893195,0.00011558358,0.00014039683,0.0013061363,0.000399731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9800049,0.007824054,0.0043220688,0.00022173552,0.005717307,0.0019098389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001336283,0.0003492381,0.00029312205,0.0032158378,0.0043620113,0.005051884,0.00038418162,0.0007979859,0.0059002154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011253402,0.00022931684,0.00015482934,0.006167349,0.0021387395,0.0011051691,0.0011450361,0.0010910747,0.00040427313],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014172497,0.0002691593,0.39979658,0.0020158093,0.0002175062,0.004236908,0.3880708,0.0007303151,0.0034858354,0.0073196143,0.09346372,0.09897638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055991673,0.00014319262,0.6135747,0.0012351754,0.00015127994,0.00076996523,0.25185597,0.00078167475,0.0013427794,0.0002827335,0.12962237,0.00018416815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8714818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91131765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12851822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018292917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009292016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25855017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550241363","doi":"10.22323/2.15020203","title":"Media portrayal of non-invasive prenatal testing: a missing ethical dimension","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics","field":"Medicine","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Genome Alberta; University of Alberta; Genome Canada","keywords":"Dimension (graph theory); Mass media; News media; Media coverage; Ethical issues; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.049603344174003985,"score_gpt":0.32955054169684445,"score_spread":0.2799471975228405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2550241363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9793676,0.0014153693,0.0007986647,0.00559573,0.00012628348,0.00003847868,0.0003634139,0.000008655139,0.012285719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99606836,0.0015994522,0.00041863832,0.000865553,0.00019565909,0.000039350856,0.00015782581,0.000020622809,0.0006344798],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925485,0.0046005994,0.00059208676,0.00028114868,0.0015212299,0.00045646512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9232377,0.05958926,0.010780279,0.0011331323,0.004472661,0.00078700104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007198799,0.00033779888,0.00030986633,0.0033108143,0.0024423269,0.0056470763,0.0004577261,0.0009981528,0.0022744148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037516978,0.00032958697,0.00021055798,0.0026550852,0.0041489047,0.0059035146,0.002563775,0.0014762353,0.00031769532],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025339084,0.000057306566,0.08704831,0.0010981234,0.000058415157,0.0014590942,0.8606913,0.00007940735,0.002560756,0.007779112,0.0030339803,0.035880864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013258961,0.00010178237,0.11855668,0.0019234743,0.00011052449,0.0011451292,0.82887894,0.00046283726,0.002040956,0.001577452,0.04512071,0.000068233676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053647133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006060279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007198799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022771996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011925027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038071334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2669641018","doi":"10.22323/2.11040202","title":"Synthetic biology in the Science Café: what have we learned about public engagement?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Genome Alberta; Genome Canada","keywords":"Public engagement; Science communication; Citizen science; Synthetic biology; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Nanotechnology; Political science; Sociology; Science education; Engineering; Physics; Biology; Bioinformatics; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.19060401034478403,"score_gpt":0.43277208798006406,"score_spread":0.24216807763528003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2669641018","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23420957,0.037698165,0.0056983195,0.6664159,0.0025593722,0.00028670594,0.00034311786,0.00024081433,0.052548025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9453763,0.017856149,0.0028147392,0.027991131,0.0009362393,0.00043115558,0.00023980175,0.000094239294,0.004260185],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9710929,0.019789334,0.00067355816,0.0015730473,0.0028156233,0.0040556616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85413504,0.10244244,0.0070620663,0.0050566066,0.016715322,0.014588513],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.050293427,0.00070385204,0.0011411698,0.0023041558,0.012590058,0.018744044,0.0024770044,0.0059542856,0.013428432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09784568,0.00041623652,0.00100956,0.003144508,0.011014579,0.026875604,0.009832914,0.007593743,0.0014894181],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059909903,0.0010570103,0.0457444,0.005159176,0.00014300674,0.0010098816,0.3765789,0.00041875138,0.00062713947,0.048864465,0.045129664,0.47466847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001218929,0.0006168681,0.0365121,0.008784285,0.0001342749,0.00047713172,0.55151117,0.0009148972,0.0010159452,0.03190325,0.36783102,0.00017725675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041943297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042629246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98740995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013193363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027651394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26598024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2670898717","doi":"10.22323/2.07040203","title":"Changes in publication statistics when electronic submission was introduced in an international applied science journal","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Population; Agriculture; Period (music); Political science; Social science; Geography; Sociology; Demography; Computer science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.035266174581766035,"score_gpt":0.27420140161666834,"score_spread":0.2389352270349023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2670898717","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84324914,0.018389318,0.014895995,0.028644579,0.021436552,0.0011393984,0.03259697,0.0038668308,0.03578124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9464023,0.0052994615,0.01231982,0.0039111758,0.005607681,0.0012297968,0.016151868,0.0012247873,0.007853039],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.82872903,0.034694966,0.066026084,0.009167338,0.05611538,0.0052672136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2575326,0.263759,0.22914729,0.024278913,0.20456569,0.020716509],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11776537,0.00055982935,0.0015099137,0.022827623,0.0020335682,0.013046774,0.0014310838,0.0012937648,0.0035781735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4674404,0.0006584364,0.0015521131,0.03212139,0.0014378601,0.0046444153,0.0025358892,0.0028231093,0.0031633677],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041617155,0.00031230808,0.70384926,0.0032396826,0.0011829947,0.00085111475,0.0038367375,0.0008427503,0.00556489,0.0024586061,0.06393556,0.20976435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092369504,0.00057007506,0.9254985,0.0005463724,0.00028247066,0.0008950007,0.0031712137,0.00078102964,0.0032759034,0.0010029193,0.06367595,0.00020816227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002126681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032268187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9771724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041391817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005900146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62281024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2730382380","doi":"10.22323/2.07040701","title":"How-to establish PCST. Two handbooks on science communication","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Field (mathematics); China; Sociology; Science communication; Point (geometry); Media studies; Engineering ethics; Social science; Library science; Epistemology; History; Engineering; Computer science; Science education; Pedagogy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.4797274534539139,"score_gpt":0.4779213545407001,"score_spread":0.0018060989132137606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2730382380","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034261043,0.13130467,0.03441484,0.28388155,0.031791635,0.00043102077,0.0010702155,0.0012711119,0.5124089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18980305,0.15980592,0.081545696,0.10861309,0.015642636,0.002239858,0.0027647545,0.0025270744,0.43705785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916441,0.0039059105,0.0005865733,0.00069970527,0.0025283964,0.00063537544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98459816,0.006276061,0.0006858119,0.0023433089,0.0041297674,0.0019669023],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008762887,0.0008791676,0.0007816271,0.0042610765,0.005728704,0.0134328855,0.0018062089,0.0056947535,0.03522768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026457323,0.0005633619,0.00076925044,0.004391369,0.01335709,0.027420226,0.00842032,0.008207027,0.02576731],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002928252,0.0000537164,0.0004915823,0.0011707072,0.000016832159,0.00027195353,0.01304458,0.00010972869,0.0003528909,0.35690823,0.3264576,0.30109286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004599646,0.000012622162,0.0003421234,0.000887124,0.0000036395047,0.00021983913,0.0035651526,0.000052638556,0.00020707985,0.042591587,0.9520993,0.000014422552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057557262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98656714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041661514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011490734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11784834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734910865","doi":"10.22323/2.08020307","title":"The theatre, (art) and science: between amazement and applause!","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Museums and Cultural Heritage","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Drama; Museology; Virtuality (gaming); Interpreter; Realm; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Media studies; Aesthetics; Visual arts; Art; Computer science; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics; Law","score_opus":0.03624234464051674,"score_gpt":0.2802546779567158,"score_spread":0.2440123333161991,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2734910865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024646405,0.15467045,0.008416515,0.22247338,0.012705368,0.000040224022,0.00011170697,0.00037523764,0.5765608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7177364,0.041090824,0.006619293,0.02267071,0.008696168,0.00009782069,0.00010575577,0.00040571735,0.20257734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958234,0.002553608,0.00009816193,0.00024267478,0.0007580582,0.000524041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996409,0.0017348668,0.00022702449,0.0005497051,0.000378718,0.0007007587],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040374277,0.00070579397,0.00052768737,0.0012848164,0.011081656,0.020436866,0.000830682,0.0033048496,0.017445214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00651451,0.00037455952,0.00044509475,0.0013154516,0.029144326,0.017644752,0.010342346,0.005824613,0.0034576484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015138909,0.000037897982,0.001113212,0.00047057448,0.000022909517,0.0002807357,0.091971256,0.00012681764,0.00057148683,0.651854,0.14460039,0.10879927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014246783,0.00004786079,0.001026367,0.0005886691,0.000012990539,0.00051639194,0.04170529,0.00009047361,0.00022147749,0.09275719,0.8629819,0.000037032267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077093104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012252616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98891836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034164349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030841231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05836004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2862060752","doi":"10.22323/2.17030801","title":"Beyond self-confidence: a participatory evaluation of personal change in Science Gallery's Mediators","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Museums and Cultural Heritage","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Empathy; Self-confidence; Interpersonal communication; Psychology; Personal development; Exhibition; Citizen journalism; Social psychology; Political science; Art; Visual arts; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.16591163640972673,"score_gpt":0.3658021706086295,"score_spread":0.1998905341989028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2862060752","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9749463,0.00024874334,0.004069063,0.0006321502,0.00007816077,0.011928766,0.00014555763,0.00004689492,0.007904331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9587181,0.000264374,0.012356237,0.00024704082,0.000040712108,0.026154995,0.00008898288,0.000025846937,0.0021038055],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.93880725,0.050987814,0.0018383203,0.002508472,0.003007251,0.002850909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9182692,0.061782215,0.003906354,0.0055093807,0.00662944,0.0039034325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0597927,0.0011035164,0.0013971379,0.0016459941,0.007394172,0.003495683,0.0028603477,0.0026299085,0.0068432274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.073258884,0.00075029145,0.0013560228,0.0010542158,0.0065326304,0.0027008897,0.008786145,0.0026863716,0.00049757736],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007584964,0.027259102,0.021958806,0.0049174405,0.0003266567,0.00094700354,0.6820085,0.0015871626,0.00857033,0.0056084995,0.0014040136,0.23782751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011390514,0.08550963,0.07043313,0.002859248,0.0012337589,0.00045851173,0.73031294,0.0031092956,0.028272616,0.012857312,0.05318769,0.0003754026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025180613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050722156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0597927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044099414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009727414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31621778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891979380","doi":"10.22323/2.17030208","title":"Digging deeper? Muddling through? How environmental activists make sense and use of science —an exploratory study","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Context (archaeology); Citizen science; Science communication; Sociology; Public relations; Situational ethics; Work (physics); Field (mathematics); Engineering ethics; Political science; Psychology; Engineering; Science education; Social psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.4454020205540797,"score_gpt":0.45317691245146574,"score_spread":0.00777489189738606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891979380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98911464,0.00015645608,0.0006680589,0.0008875167,0.000015665682,0.00008415891,0.000029599805,0.000008942166,0.009034942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99607486,0.00024710046,0.00062370667,0.0003364387,0.000013661542,0.00009514487,0.000025418622,0.000015745045,0.0025678487],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927811,0.004551498,0.0001363688,0.0005453062,0.0006990144,0.0012867907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989833,0.007854814,0.00087768165,0.00031364377,0.0004944223,0.00062641205],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066306805,0.00042713073,0.00058282586,0.0022725544,0.011764154,0.007929039,0.0014869835,0.0023706565,0.002322062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012874203,0.000634108,0.0002966181,0.001548902,0.0126052825,0.0050638285,0.0060648415,0.0030537595,0.00036124568],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017816872,0.000045660494,0.0031223379,0.000025860601,0.0000029253206,0.00019002141,0.99198616,0.00001169179,0.00065802777,0.0010348064,0.00016710533,0.0027375498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002982725,0.00002775915,0.0026347851,0.000038243197,0.000003257934,0.00007683238,0.9897063,0.00005038214,0.00020741341,0.00034151014,0.0069025904,0.0000079562105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029179526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053877212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98823583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002884752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033555625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05801934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3113078843","doi":"10.22323/2.19070208","title":"Spikey blobs with evil grins: understanding portrayals of the coronavirus in South African newspaper cartoons in relation to the public communication of science","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Communication and COVID-19 Impact","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Rhetorical question; Context (archaeology); Pandemic; Population; Meaning (existential); Media studies; History; Quarter (Canadian coin); Coronavirus; Sociology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Psychology; Literature; Art; Demography; Medicine","score_opus":0.2021233297016818,"score_gpt":0.37814212428392957,"score_spread":0.17601879458224778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3113078843","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9647486,0.0018171942,0.0012519582,0.0046446603,0.0001779141,0.000025805586,0.0001100368,0.000010963138,0.027212838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99644035,0.001014174,0.00041489428,0.0004749094,0.00010490545,0.000015027091,0.000036329668,0.0000133980275,0.0014860011],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984635,0.0010847694,0.00003971514,0.00007686604,0.00018167568,0.00015353832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902159,0.006920333,0.001931281,0.00019493511,0.0004910495,0.00024648523],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026964725,0.00046676,0.0001833012,0.0027099703,0.003084764,0.0051537985,0.00030138917,0.0009988433,0.0034586277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011238794,0.00022943779,0.00017936337,0.0017647152,0.0048801275,0.004912976,0.0022958019,0.0013140211,0.00032777767],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090945316,0.000013470213,0.011745759,0.00021767497,0.000010498108,0.0009138555,0.9683962,0.00004789991,0.0022297367,0.0050663394,0.0013869404,0.009880654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056058907,0.000042669766,0.032355778,0.0004003506,0.000022550948,0.00066305423,0.91842324,0.00034208893,0.0006451067,0.0018404381,0.045234066,0.000025062262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006077559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00963211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9969152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017685604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073490577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014260471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136749786","doi":"10.22323/2.20020205","title":"Science communication for social inclusion: exploring science & art approaches","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Innovative Human-Technology Interaction","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Fundação Champalimaud","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Citizen journalism; Community engagement; Plan (archaeology); Public relations; Sociology; Participatory action research; Social exclusion; Social engagement; Psychology; Political science; Social science; Geography","score_opus":0.2897788961395961,"score_gpt":0.3800526897630794,"score_spread":0.09027379362348326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136749786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4472258,0.010493661,0.06928453,0.043832924,0.00063897745,0.00078288413,0.000076271506,0.00015708961,0.42750797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97923636,0.0020983927,0.010578343,0.00082625303,0.00011970593,0.00044078488,0.000019265777,0.00004411802,0.006636841],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9754955,0.020031996,0.00031930703,0.0007884903,0.0019879781,0.0013767025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827251,0.013204438,0.0009992155,0.00096496765,0.0008529016,0.0012534696],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013736551,0.00086874596,0.0006105481,0.0051097763,0.017612373,0.022320999,0.002154239,0.004240753,0.006210594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01145624,0.00038857863,0.00087815954,0.0028450112,0.031618424,0.012622726,0.024886802,0.002852514,0.00060149044],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007080304,0.00032820806,0.004788837,0.0010583213,0.000049245737,0.0010148395,0.6847627,0.00038382754,0.0015861366,0.22230968,0.0015259839,0.08212146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004587066,0.00027353567,0.005015921,0.0018219259,0.00007499697,0.0010228523,0.6696445,0.0014751409,0.0017173495,0.16819336,0.15066494,0.000049646467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019814945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033390787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.977679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053407424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069869794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07264668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4295981278","doi":"10.22323/2.21060601","title":"A focus on science communication at #ICA22","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Skepticism; Science communication; Theme (computing); Field (mathematics); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Communication sciences; Focus (optics); Engineering ethics; Communication studies; Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology; Social science; Engineering; Science education; Pedagogy; Medicine; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.05223093520559259,"score_gpt":0.37521158668816706,"score_spread":0.3229806514825745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4295981278","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039840913,0.009849713,0.0013133504,0.28175256,0.20961358,0.00019864956,0.0015019515,0.00082416006,0.490962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02416205,0.0033257003,0.00066313887,0.031244975,0.033440422,0.00020279629,0.000560181,0.00062709657,0.90577364],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99452066,0.000910579,0.00014366674,0.00079406204,0.001902484,0.0017285142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98906076,0.0018808483,0.00040162663,0.00040040168,0.0031287633,0.005127696],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004751807,0.00166638,0.0008626674,0.0025981548,0.0142893195,0.024216024,0.0013729648,0.013475645,0.26609272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010630613,0.00043974043,0.0013271752,0.0022380266,0.002722791,0.009056577,0.0065673506,0.016146425,0.100223124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006940671,0.000033596523,0.00019883754,0.00013618002,0.0000035982378,0.00015309759,0.0006752145,0.0000290803,0.0005450511,0.011231087,0.9688787,0.018046109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004849786,0.000021575963,0.00053345057,0.000088165565,0.000003253292,0.00005165346,0.0005892949,0.000034624296,0.00020740548,0.0008763707,0.9975751,0.000014303582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009356345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02067988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.975784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00796574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010374093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89016885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317213546","doi":"10.22323/2.22010204","title":"`Pandem-icons' — exploring the characteristics of highly visible scientists during the Covid-19 pandemic","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Göteborgs Universitet; Chalmers Tekniska Högskola","keywords":"Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Credibility; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Political science; Phenomenon; Public relations; Medicine; Virology; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.5992953918133371,"score_gpt":0.48657358488103747,"score_spread":0.11272180693229966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317213546","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.995752,0.00010196065,0.00016323187,0.0005879905,0.00002282177,0.0000125125525,0.000060022972,0.0000041943185,0.0032952763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992091,0.00009606055,0.00010796619,0.00018814414,0.000017995804,0.000011097367,0.0000599596,0.0000046030586,0.0003050947],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751174,0.00134257,0.00016507908,0.00022128313,0.0003066147,0.00045284044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97584325,0.010706935,0.008165995,0.0010700867,0.0020506305,0.0021631008],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045758556,0.00012542096,0.0002361653,0.0020726721,0.0026658892,0.0031436097,0.00040411882,0.0011266775,0.0023071505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026055096,0.00021589136,0.00019807577,0.0016548006,0.0028400712,0.0028289023,0.003730281,0.0014672462,0.00024389655],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002511242,0.000059932212,0.43055686,0.00015108295,0.000048249374,0.00063770835,0.5453489,0.000096027296,0.0022562996,0.0018175312,0.0024890099,0.01628719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008735857,0.00009761046,0.45571506,0.0001278124,0.000015712492,0.0004650401,0.52984226,0.00015944266,0.0003374664,0.0006535063,0.012528722,0.000048630045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048268465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067124926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9973341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010071405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012451967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024199665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362579514","doi":"10.22323/2.22020202","title":"Socioscientific issues in science exhibitions: examining contributions of the informal science education sector","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Museums and Cultural Heritage","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Mitacs","keywords":"Exhibition; Relevance (law); Sustainability; Science communication; Science education; Situated; Sociology; Higher education; Public engagement; Balance (ability); Qualitative research; Pedagogy; Public relations; Political science; Social science; Psychology; Art; Computer science; Visual arts","score_opus":0.0675105587284729,"score_gpt":0.32707741852215927,"score_spread":0.2595668597936864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362579514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96240205,0.0005331521,0.0014958056,0.001981524,0.000077744815,0.000039550076,0.000024397323,0.00001940914,0.033426266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974093,0.0002080576,0.00028856916,0.000117462776,0.000032198524,0.00002194777,0.000011718568,0.000010156984,0.0019004814],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908958,0.006739594,0.00019560137,0.00041659322,0.00065840484,0.0010939221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9730576,0.020017602,0.0024256557,0.001776728,0.00085245655,0.0018700226],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007882947,0.00033456873,0.00033021852,0.0018051518,0.011156569,0.008355028,0.0012288591,0.0016990239,0.005539017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017145833,0.0002826058,0.00034038018,0.001627497,0.014954465,0.004260971,0.013766719,0.0022947635,0.00026394828],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049707978,0.0000714863,0.020379076,0.00016776683,0.00001557816,0.0012075561,0.9511854,0.00010004736,0.00077146443,0.010587469,0.00062453613,0.014839935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052395876,0.00006212272,0.012551636,0.00016744317,0.000011000767,0.00059680286,0.94998074,0.000114164555,0.00027697592,0.0024303687,0.03378787,0.000015766002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002920753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006951184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98884344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026396108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028488582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041689515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366090307","doi":"10.22323/2.22020204","title":"Who are “we”? Examining relational ethos in British Columbia, Canada's COVID-19 public health communication","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Public Relations and Crisis Communication","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Rhetorical question; Ambivalence; Public relations; Identity (music); Public health; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Media studies; Psychology; Linguistics; Medicine; Law; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.17553695220202675,"score_gpt":0.38970359226778134,"score_spread":0.2141666400657546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366090307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7341104,0.0020070663,0.003065213,0.03620663,0.00025151277,0.00009293298,0.00010511602,0.00004315982,0.22411793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99223846,0.00031760556,0.00038215378,0.0011507756,0.000015740237,0.000020970505,0.000018882645,0.000023656265,0.005831891],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98629946,0.007914288,0.00029180333,0.00069147977,0.002937098,0.0018659346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97969615,0.012780258,0.0019101952,0.00043125558,0.0034856962,0.0016965196],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013362847,0.00045101476,0.00048059216,0.0037215387,0.044084243,0.015587643,0.0016969442,0.0031920583,0.0038607442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022446858,0.0005145815,0.00018374111,0.0039539626,0.033886705,0.005691814,0.008626988,0.006253942,0.0003394815],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018410503,0.000013895638,0.0031874985,0.00005161522,0.0000037948007,0.00048586164,0.9497913,0.000042314994,0.00037158493,0.038977318,0.0022964615,0.00475992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045169945,0.000008073652,0.0038228657,0.00013216225,0.0000067001133,0.0000911201,0.95352745,0.00013018552,0.00020229418,0.0025406547,0.039514743,0.000019387402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8870174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9309057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95591575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08836058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07388141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64110386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385423981","doi":"10.22323/2.22040204","title":"Besieged from all sides: impediments to science journalism in a developing country and their global implications","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Bộ Giáo dục và Ðào tạo; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Journalism; Battle; Status quo; Political science; Vietnamese; Normative; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Politics; Media studies; Sociology; Law; History","score_opus":0.1443527324088257,"score_gpt":0.4685787653243745,"score_spread":0.32422603291554875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385423981","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9507345,0.0005293261,0.0003122634,0.020244585,0.000082292856,0.000040579245,0.00004842931,0.00000865072,0.027999403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978655,0.00023635096,0.0001117926,0.00072714,0.000018971015,0.000012897477,0.0000090382855,0.000005576643,0.0010127377],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98889714,0.007001451,0.0005580611,0.000427077,0.0012333334,0.0018828558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.937143,0.037393328,0.010727016,0.0015154678,0.0041728844,0.009048233],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012220795,0.00014532448,0.00022970988,0.0011153532,0.008086353,0.009515836,0.0006361809,0.0010651295,0.003578896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030854203,0.00032969005,0.00012662746,0.0020700435,0.008751562,0.0033270752,0.00361158,0.0025136503,0.00024126544],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017167689,0.00012964588,0.19081719,0.0004767793,0.000041731568,0.004910564,0.72253287,0.00022775312,0.0014122315,0.045034643,0.005555225,0.028689673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015932514,0.00006340027,0.059601173,0.00022110202,0.000012994341,0.00067945215,0.8972042,0.00021365847,0.00044733187,0.005023865,0.036485136,0.00003176219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021713508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031414833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9904842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045382464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00997859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06463057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385637241","doi":"10.22323/2.22040205","title":"``It's my job'': a qualitative study of the mediatization of science within the scientist-journalist relationship","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Outreach; Public relations; Sociology; Science communication; Point (geometry); Humanism; Qualitative research; Media studies; Political science; Social science; Pedagogy; Science education","score_opus":0.5269363333444109,"score_gpt":0.5474542689623372,"score_spread":0.020517935617926253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385637241","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9782225,0.0006473345,0.0041133645,0.0053450377,0.00014395676,0.00022918406,0.0001560146,0.00002229968,0.011120453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993148,0.00062922545,0.0010331064,0.0012502734,0.00003577382,0.00030238024,0.000049115082,0.000032881984,0.0035192322],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9735874,0.022237018,0.00040146935,0.0007423038,0.001156983,0.0018748791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9291447,0.063311234,0.0027493578,0.00068262237,0.0019936417,0.002118511],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026560888,0.00058977486,0.00083884783,0.0025228446,0.017701948,0.0071045132,0.0019371408,0.0026640072,0.0037940843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040168777,0.0009299261,0.0003719325,0.0023025398,0.017686574,0.007236079,0.006331603,0.0047487277,0.0005045889],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002221185,0.00002369952,0.00093108707,0.000041716987,0.0000014116227,0.00023740048,0.9963439,0.000011100753,0.0004579129,0.00076451467,0.00017348626,0.0009915568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035850753,0.000024835568,0.00055711914,0.00006122558,0.0000014724027,0.00006932729,0.9954211,0.00002793185,0.00020099197,0.00021327482,0.0034137089,0.000005423053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009360262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015156844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9822981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056926156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007136779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14046907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393158656","doi":"10.22323/2.23020803","title":"Teaching to bridge research and practice: perspectives from science communication educators across the world","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidad Veracruzana; University of the West of England; Technische Universität Dortmund; University of Bristol","keywords":"Bridge (graph theory); Engineering ethics; Sociology; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Psychology; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.5683002512154804,"score_gpt":0.6365189141715797,"score_spread":0.06821866295609924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393158656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87362,0.006901756,0.0067812414,0.07314111,0.0007293539,0.00013205351,0.000043798933,0.0000624211,0.03858836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97779703,0.004393027,0.0031278848,0.0099833,0.00015150364,0.000108774875,0.000027190348,0.00006642329,0.004344759],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97446185,0.018276831,0.00058440416,0.001163637,0.0020640756,0.0034492868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9435589,0.042886548,0.0023125825,0.0014326302,0.0039420463,0.0058673844],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02998242,0.00072117546,0.0010408474,0.003859979,0.028065147,0.026885806,0.002680639,0.0067367335,0.0020794293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040216953,0.0010361479,0.000569843,0.0034069263,0.024158824,0.016332582,0.01859147,0.012645164,0.0003353954],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000090310505,0.000056234465,0.0016872175,0.00006348949,0.000005336161,0.00056480384,0.9851075,0.000026552214,0.00017290244,0.003887199,0.00065123755,0.0077684834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049531163,0.000032703294,0.000497215,0.0001767131,0.000005598236,0.00032233653,0.9807057,0.00005384611,0.00013854545,0.001121456,0.016929517,0.000011475722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010163809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019855855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9731142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060001877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010887744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15856409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401090735","doi":"10.22323/2.23050205","title":"The power of dinosaurs: lessons learned from the sharing of #SciArt on Twitter","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Social Media in Health Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University; Science North","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Power (physics); Social media; World Wide Web; Computer science; Physics","score_opus":0.3198612891781879,"score_gpt":0.49491833966599524,"score_spread":0.17505705048780734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401090735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8669939,0.0023940667,0.009396832,0.014791014,0.0003152563,0.00013412966,0.0011094335,0.000093095245,0.10477233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882967,0.0011130302,0.003338561,0.0009824904,0.0001315099,0.00008178012,0.0003325542,0.00009585514,0.005627633],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699473,0.0017377483,0.0001139304,0.0004180461,0.000414889,0.00032059068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884837,0.008777446,0.0006906478,0.00066731765,0.0008516586,0.00052928715],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048566433,0.00045138333,0.00050927885,0.0036480594,0.005351189,0.007169666,0.0011404939,0.0014055321,0.0073191714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016251413,0.00036616361,0.00041265666,0.003628221,0.007273591,0.010969832,0.00590719,0.0015941581,0.00093339285],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015255353,0.000029438135,0.04711524,0.00051787513,0.000049261158,0.00091685145,0.8650982,0.00020606171,0.0020831006,0.024817724,0.0045870235,0.054426707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011544214,0.00007057675,0.056563895,0.00072294305,0.000057372257,0.0004531623,0.8309665,0.0015438884,0.0010885446,0.01911669,0.08930985,0.000095054216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018124321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03475423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99283034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023696949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016125061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036037624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402356442","doi":"10.22323/2.23060801","title":"Creating resonance with arts-based approaches to sustainability science communication","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Privy Council Office","funders":"Novo Nordisk","keywords":"The arts; Mainstream; Sustainability; Constructive; Affection; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Visual arts; Engineering; Art; Social psychology; Process (computing); Ecology","score_opus":0.5574890306468313,"score_gpt":0.49046802453326926,"score_spread":0.06702100611356204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402356442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38686353,0.0020883724,0.19376941,0.045515027,0.0019228525,0.0008986648,0.00010508961,0.0004145053,0.36842263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.961234,0.00046042824,0.024318166,0.002744079,0.00022192059,0.0006304156,0.000024942625,0.00014597026,0.010220081],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9600214,0.033154435,0.00063122384,0.0016889977,0.0028282637,0.0016757388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9523972,0.038735766,0.0018010346,0.0038559723,0.0015089329,0.0017011043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028893694,0.0009004772,0.00044421665,0.0019649998,0.013136,0.0136925755,0.0024558147,0.0035857381,0.009509178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032051157,0.0006015463,0.0010627183,0.0011138677,0.034352787,0.011853316,0.025358768,0.006260791,0.0014270466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019439546,0.00031825548,0.0020476922,0.00061873265,0.000046422385,0.00062362466,0.71430814,0.001312458,0.006405871,0.2328547,0.0039710943,0.037298523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022751586,0.00052857975,0.002825281,0.0009507174,0.00008142153,0.001137395,0.45387724,0.003368231,0.010595382,0.24494101,0.28124976,0.00021747709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010207979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013896412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028893694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030214076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026596817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15280628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412479454","doi":"10.22323/148020250716165543","title":"How can we enable school students to learn and participate in science engagement initiatives? Roles and tasks of enablers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Science Communication","topic":"Diverse Educational Innovations Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; Canada First Research Excellence Fund; Justus Liebig Universität Gießen; Ocean Frontier Institute; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung","keywords":"Student engagement; Mathematics education; Psychology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.07720070253088383,"score_gpt":0.348628885788546,"score_spread":0.27142818325766216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412479454","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7945889,0.0011830156,0.061739475,0.06661191,0.00073455396,0.0016653788,0.00014815017,0.0009119059,0.072416715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778309,0.00040856758,0.015301624,0.0013755505,0.000062665604,0.0009234477,0.00007139241,0.00007282202,0.0039530112],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9536984,0.034166336,0.0009581749,0.0024946276,0.0021590292,0.0065233386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94936734,0.018674236,0.0043400205,0.0053207665,0.0030471222,0.019250564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04247131,0.000984384,0.0006978083,0.002131444,0.008416829,0.020382976,0.0026879893,0.0048545394,0.00545495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050543137,0.00090792414,0.0011212218,0.0010197957,0.013136142,0.018572379,0.024080785,0.0062386924,0.002373324],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035889665,0.0025094065,0.061235167,0.0011985954,0.00009743708,0.0007177351,0.6528803,0.0006096843,0.004160758,0.06902583,0.00783658,0.19936961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024014604,0.0015276524,0.03629377,0.0013129641,0.00014484146,0.00045628985,0.632482,0.0018584933,0.0052303765,0.08749631,0.23267223,0.000284888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017024907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002639311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04247131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032962754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011820526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22461241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}