{"meta":{"query_hash":"1cfdf359394a","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Second Language Acquisition and Teaching"},"cohort_total":1,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":1,"exported":1,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/1cfdf359394a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Second+Language+Acquisition+and+Teaching"},"results":[{"id":"W2119531824","doi":"","title":"THE ROLE OF LEXICAL COHESION IN THE ASSESSMENT OF EFL READING PROFICIENCY","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Second Language Acquisition and Teaching","topic":"Second Language Acquisition and Learning","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Test of English as a Foreign Language; Cohesion (chemistry); Linguistics; Test (biology); Reading comprehension; Reading (process); Psychology; Lexical item; Computer science; Lexical density; Language proficiency; Natural language processing; Language assessment","score_opus":0.008461694742595905,"score_gpt":0.3420416450521756,"score_spread":0.3335799503095797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119531824","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9658964,0.0058233114,0.00063996407,0.00015551876,0.00014226188,0.00010557569,0.0000023419082,0.0000048109,0.02722977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983701,0.000008161513,0.00038423444,0.0009565822,0.00016842248,0.0000013410223,0.0000029344794,0.000008416124,0.00009981007],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998267,0.00047142376,0.0006738164,0.00010619547,0.00028126856,0.00020030138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983167,0.0007927419,0.0006094413,0.00017364167,0.000059342397,0.00004811381],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005751573,0.00009659758,0.00021742283,0.00021373191,0.00016071998,0.000034245975,0.00021475568,0.00007724215,0.0023049442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010384674,0.00005608825,0.00009545872,0.00010462176,0.00008027695,0.00013664587,0.000025066964,0.0006283729,0.0000012260462],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005137619,0.0008355078,0.02987074,0.00010653154,0.0001839722,0.0005544157,0.22202137,0.000028240502,0.24631952,0.14343871,0.00037665697,0.35575056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017196714,0.00067409687,0.531713,0.00023019334,0.00005273572,0.0009400713,0.45591024,0.00017992381,0.0048393467,0.0006364683,0.002935252,0.0001689812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042867574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012366627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5018423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026948712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022876773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}