{"meta":{"query_hash":"3f5e0057d6fb","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Semantics"},"cohort_total":27,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":27,"exported":27,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3f5e0057d6fb","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Semantics"},"results":[{"id":"W1988016002","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffn007","title":"Syntax and Semantics of It-Clefts: A Tree Adjoining Grammar Analysis","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science; Syntax; Programming language; Grammar; Semantics (computer science); Linguistics; Tree (set theory); Natural language processing; Abstract syntax tree; Philosophy; Mathematics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.017241096335214583,"score_gpt":0.25963297037319355,"score_spread":0.24239187403797896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988016002","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044218305,0.00029947222,0.93438745,0.0009844557,0.00007121579,0.000113567905,0.00026121153,0.00054615573,0.01911822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69501,0.00043688592,0.29798362,0.0004225577,0.000099801204,0.00016736716,0.00050364767,0.0005448457,0.004831215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884015,0.00045668666,0.000119331125,0.00020129494,0.0002819512,0.000100606165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983437,0.0007379955,0.00015295814,0.0003163381,0.00037220583,0.00007683058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016013827,0.00045993156,0.0005317658,0.0012394759,0.0011641479,0.0023465278,0.0010283364,0.00095599564,0.0034767452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027478153,0.0003787675,0.0014271553,0.0013778651,0.004216595,0.005344014,0.0018409289,0.001639588,0.0005818096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007034123,0.0000062695794,0.00030002045,0.000030707855,0.000005897684,0.00018370392,0.001260874,0.0013106916,0.0010935833,0.98917574,0.00041368202,0.0062118145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072830044,0.000017826073,0.00034235627,0.000032720447,0.000022336015,0.00027489665,0.0005374652,0.02109999,0.0017122999,0.96563184,0.010306768,0.000014275676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002763104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015240497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034767452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012227689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013707294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011630833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990695985","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffr013","title":"Indefinites, Dependent Plurality, and the Viability Requirement on Scalar Alternatives","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Scalar (mathematics); Semantics (computer science); Media studies; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics; Programming language","score_opus":0.048490986725338615,"score_gpt":0.273617053657584,"score_spread":0.22512606693224538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990695985","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75315195,0.0010872524,0.068361476,0.0031197618,0.0001333167,0.00006410566,0.0003652519,0.0004082077,0.17330876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99235874,0.00012253501,0.0045397514,0.00016214886,0.00005152306,0.0000177916,0.00014569527,0.00011586919,0.002485928],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803704,0.0006728405,0.00019853747,0.0005266726,0.000394446,0.00017049705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938747,0.002722492,0.000646413,0.0011456561,0.0013144976,0.00029611093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00205907,0.00048222236,0.0005278222,0.00068832986,0.001809806,0.003436,0.0009719487,0.0015412781,0.0057233935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064866534,0.00062025466,0.0006817507,0.0005330205,0.005528478,0.008784729,0.002871725,0.0020924828,0.0006668027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019035013,0.000059272,0.0058180955,0.00016890079,0.000027942628,0.0008223693,0.0069676633,0.00039627202,0.010007929,0.9620559,0.0011379996,0.012347216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013073462,0.00023394999,0.01718215,0.00010763705,0.000064547356,0.0020035885,0.007739185,0.0052477955,0.0077584125,0.91433203,0.04504744,0.00015247361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030205145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036905676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057233935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013395784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065833627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019146621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064997527","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffr001","title":"The Role of Microvariation in the Study of Semantic Universals: Adverbial Quantifiers in European and Quebec French","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adverbial; Quantifier (linguistics); Linguistics; Variation (astronomy); Semantics (computer science); Problem of universals; Computer science; Semantic property; Syntax; Lexical semantics; Focus (optics); Argument (complex analysis); Natural language processing; Lexical item; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0292324864006396,"score_gpt":0.22440344037883578,"score_spread":0.19517095397819617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064997527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93672085,0.0031593079,0.014020452,0.0031749897,0.0000305423,0.0000143454445,0.00018068355,0.000083011495,0.042615812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974058,0.00019977536,0.0012565133,0.00007997955,0.000008492594,0.0000049901823,0.000028399503,0.000016001297,0.0010001112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990798,0.00040382156,0.00004398116,0.00016329378,0.00013171248,0.0001773902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969042,0.0017046204,0.0003120435,0.0002348329,0.00069212186,0.00015211875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022419987,0.00023113922,0.00038346025,0.0020641447,0.0035607645,0.0034027419,0.0007545498,0.00071829703,0.0017630366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004445167,0.00020004742,0.00036476617,0.0022872635,0.0073714266,0.0037854917,0.0014591389,0.0009263658,0.00007385462],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001885409,0.00004108993,0.02679713,0.00015593725,0.00008460989,0.0005923293,0.050477453,0.0023734784,0.005528667,0.87130535,0.0012679459,0.041187465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000088019384,0.00017437317,0.3688207,0.0004179219,0.00027451722,0.0015874269,0.06920303,0.023626221,0.007854945,0.42718422,0.10018938,0.00057926256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72922397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71431506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27077603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013857587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037987677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5447414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090445977","doi":"10.1093/jos/fft012","title":"Beyond Demonstratives: Direct Reference in Perceptually Grounded Descriptions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021156855896456005,"score_gpt":0.26698930372535107,"score_spread":0.24583244782889507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090445977","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26588994,0.0031965387,0.5353313,0.004376281,0.00022305574,0.00014239535,0.0003133455,0.00066964945,0.18985756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97749114,0.00044251728,0.017922617,0.00022528833,0.00005631822,0.00003575941,0.00010319932,0.00012582703,0.00359735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99313873,0.003949217,0.00040121624,0.0010608885,0.0011454443,0.00030452295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905004,0.0052057765,0.00075573934,0.002191367,0.0011263174,0.00022043045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005366105,0.0004855655,0.0005482553,0.0017340735,0.0020529325,0.005066157,0.0014604811,0.0018235329,0.00447706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01528038,0.00055760867,0.00056964887,0.001579536,0.009633061,0.025329633,0.0073865536,0.0023313344,0.00064786675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000397985,0.000010602873,0.0003357267,0.00010499918,0.0000085997435,0.00025953143,0.018689588,0.00023214181,0.0022665013,0.96631324,0.00026925583,0.011469924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003199101,0.00006747484,0.00085239066,0.00010501971,0.000029717521,0.00057031156,0.010468588,0.0022619017,0.004900781,0.95300823,0.027650207,0.000053335414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019906436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013329065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005366105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014545047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090131315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028379023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107744105","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffm010","title":"On the Meaning of Only","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.035273103270544816,"score_gpt":0.25454582776200696,"score_spread":0.21927272449146215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107744105","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11068594,0.008839971,0.27689686,0.03692025,0.0033262854,0.00009562432,0.0006590971,0.0006675701,0.5619085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.967374,0.0013243768,0.01580846,0.0033792772,0.0011277257,0.00009248721,0.00021024642,0.00037156595,0.010311749],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977816,0.0009617544,0.00013937181,0.0005060686,0.00035915966,0.00025201592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970299,0.0014491486,0.00019630705,0.00059232436,0.0005893653,0.00014285387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036505677,0.0007900918,0.0007953653,0.0011148709,0.0039303284,0.0041991803,0.0013114791,0.002433434,0.0061234864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055611185,0.0007450446,0.0008810712,0.0009116968,0.016282463,0.01590499,0.004235099,0.004094452,0.00094864215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015392568,0.0000030332726,0.00005520077,0.000021505975,0.00000453428,0.000036582023,0.001268318,0.00005253183,0.00030860095,0.9960219,0.0005445993,0.0016677497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001544436,0.000026394899,0.00026169734,0.00006473844,0.000024083192,0.00015589506,0.0008156354,0.0006105466,0.00088632817,0.9673786,0.029742438,0.000018101704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023090478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001132068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061234864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023010909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012403216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020485103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147932261","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffu015","title":"Ignorance and Inference: Do Problems with Gricean Epistemic Reasoning Explain Children’s Difficulty with Scalar Implicature?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"National Research University Higher School of Economics; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam; Radboud Universiteit","keywords":"Operationalization; Implicature; Scalar (mathematics); Inference; Ignorance; Bounded function; Computer science; Mathematics; Linguistics; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Pragmatics; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.004934049243808189,"score_gpt":0.23261042426942738,"score_spread":0.2276763750256192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147932261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953656,0.0005414152,0.0007937634,0.00023031441,0.000012960828,0.000020741745,0.00013605745,0.00006520524,0.0028340237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99763024,0.00033810598,0.0011360337,0.000090084366,0.000008043425,0.000018958675,0.00018011882,0.0000126759205,0.0005856959],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866366,0.00013764546,0.00024462253,0.00029104436,0.00037912346,0.0002838391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904051,0.0036999057,0.003666428,0.0009720517,0.0007427938,0.0005138234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037094674,0.0012334308,0.0008532863,0.0025415004,0.00047889623,0.0027570075,0.00106786,0.0019623002,0.0032529442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013017802,0.0009990081,0.0011156576,0.0006215403,0.0039028765,0.005636983,0.0019116519,0.00200182,0.00077205943],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038351046,0.0004958509,0.8847069,0.0004829867,0.0001297683,0.011334506,0.045069825,0.0008795238,0.022113685,0.008062625,0.0008223344,0.025518427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008213108,0.0007449062,0.9370118,0.00027603778,0.00025834885,0.017521385,0.014806666,0.002428425,0.010352405,0.011458553,0.004899779,0.00015962287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00887544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060145073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00887544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069323205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009138079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019617736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2230023253","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffw006","title":"Training and Timing Local Scalar Enrichments under Global Pragmatic Pressures","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Sentence; Linguistics; Mechanism (biology); Comprehension; Reading comprehension; Interpretation (philosophy); Reading (process); Computer science; Reciprocal; Relation (database); Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Philosophy; Data mining","score_opus":0.050140740153188354,"score_gpt":0.3187917940705155,"score_spread":0.26865105391732713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2230023253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.986736,0.00024887457,0.007928592,0.0001455911,0.00009637072,0.00021706005,0.0000950603,0.00041816718,0.0041142805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98388124,0.00028243786,0.0111018475,0.0001198581,0.00005256581,0.00042587426,0.00018942317,0.00026668582,0.00368008],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991443,0.00015756385,0.000099678095,0.00036111914,0.00011639655,0.00012096218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976307,0.00112331,0.0003559535,0.00036340146,0.00014774046,0.00037892102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009537311,0.0008513421,0.0008608917,0.00025866306,0.00023188532,0.0007614118,0.0008247489,0.00060783315,0.0060888813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055714464,0.00051900523,0.0002209063,0.00020208454,0.00070626626,0.0012057911,0.0015365112,0.0015629855,0.0011457795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038408304,0.0034831264,0.0023285518,0.00063554064,0.000065159584,0.00016813897,0.0014398142,0.0012272778,0.91677594,0.0013019248,0.00052855484,0.0682052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022436788,0.048075933,0.06630567,0.00032772432,0.0005754144,0.00081064017,0.0013142137,0.04086389,0.80670875,0.01569431,0.016844308,0.00023543474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043637204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008697034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060888813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026984012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005026308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02036935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322008306","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffr004","title":"Japanese Indeterminate Negative Polarity Items and Their Scope","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":107,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Indeterminate; Scope (computer science); Polarity (international relations); Computer science; Mathematics; Chemistry; Programming language","score_opus":0.04839574268131535,"score_gpt":0.2380518497449923,"score_spread":0.18965610706367694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322008306","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9642304,0.00037423152,0.0086126,0.000057682777,0.00000729732,0.000022660837,0.00008562238,0.000037962032,0.026571581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975333,0.00007787652,0.001560434,0.000011172134,0.0000049680352,0.000012032379,0.000065255874,0.00001819469,0.00071676023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995326,0.00012646617,0.00006270885,0.0001100158,0.000096931224,0.00007142123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977754,0.001052957,0.0002777122,0.0003685454,0.00039311696,0.00013229143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007470844,0.00023156982,0.00029378175,0.0013747666,0.0010743457,0.0011555821,0.00045693095,0.0003312338,0.003186531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029503636,0.00034865743,0.00024640758,0.0010329658,0.0021184485,0.0027927666,0.0019091953,0.0004516164,0.00024798716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009560876,0.00017557034,0.1793238,0.0013801507,0.0001421645,0.0067849904,0.063124694,0.0013200049,0.24141178,0.34554812,0.0018187774,0.15801392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007861137,0.0006121603,0.6454173,0.0003332644,0.00038253216,0.012196408,0.033272993,0.009595114,0.06751618,0.17715698,0.053209204,0.00022928552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001347565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020663342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003186531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033083235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002249382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010659993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2330004190","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffq019","title":"A Note on Embedded Implicatures and Counterfactual Presuppositions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Presupposition; Semantics (computer science); Counterfactual conditional; Philosophy; Computer science; Classics; History; Linguistics; Epistemology; Programming language","score_opus":0.016518695992514546,"score_gpt":0.2652697177953459,"score_spread":0.24875102180283137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2330004190","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037292104,0.03487457,0.17024152,0.34077206,0.015384293,0.000051139443,0.00048826062,0.00037744682,0.40051866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8435859,0.018033529,0.04334538,0.014727972,0.024759194,0.0000911871,0.00028788942,0.00079412665,0.054374896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960454,0.001835232,0.00028240192,0.00061594724,0.0010050063,0.00021603418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9782633,0.017480014,0.00042852384,0.0024742624,0.0010332429,0.00032054546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007272703,0.0005280225,0.0009334792,0.0013361515,0.0031902106,0.0060143187,0.0019301783,0.0041563404,0.010445954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018172711,0.0006242153,0.00095344,0.0017950363,0.020487742,0.022165453,0.007000291,0.014118883,0.0011704526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019762367,0.000003549095,0.000043119227,0.000021055515,0.000004694117,0.00013051114,0.001242442,0.00014043713,0.00012196853,0.99085706,0.0037262351,0.0036890625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009233602,0.0000056704685,0.0001355064,0.00006413566,0.000007718959,0.00015819914,0.00033600244,0.0004262837,0.00030801448,0.949717,0.04881551,0.000016827984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004278105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004156011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010445954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026529562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019542277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03846222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783250427","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffx015","title":"Underspecification in Degree Operators","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Underspecification; Semantics (computer science); Scale (ratio); Identification (biology); Computer science; Vocabulary; Continuation; Degree (music); Feature (linguistics); Semantic interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Linguistics; Natural language processing; Mathematics; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.10250219864726234,"score_gpt":0.291030773315871,"score_spread":0.18852857466860867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783250427","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44573438,0.0009346253,0.39928648,0.0017611212,0.00023402966,0.00007492603,0.00026572705,0.00084969343,0.15085897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98361546,0.00015064915,0.0114303725,0.00015292727,0.000086052365,0.000028240938,0.00005679486,0.00016607398,0.004313506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970317,0.0009270182,0.00025561592,0.0007394108,0.0006547831,0.00039146157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977112,0.0009884977,0.00021493805,0.00061187247,0.00036134338,0.00011217267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002574097,0.00043170786,0.00047055157,0.0010691151,0.0017854816,0.0029976503,0.0008442103,0.0008948833,0.004610305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041502523,0.00044678405,0.00087411824,0.0009446497,0.0055180723,0.009295251,0.0043259426,0.0017336137,0.00041661877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016676015,0.000004615085,0.00036491756,0.000025628786,0.0000055056626,0.000108235865,0.0015764363,0.00036530235,0.0018910996,0.99046916,0.00018981988,0.0049825977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016341732,0.000024120878,0.0010308746,0.000022474554,0.000027834325,0.00042242013,0.0008353214,0.004352465,0.002547974,0.97583336,0.014859373,0.000027465247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017340397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014135932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004610305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016337981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075743796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792807544","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffx011","title":"Projecting Possibilities in the Nominal Domain: Spanish Uno Cualquiera","year":2017,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Domain (mathematical analysis); Humanities; Philosophy; Mathematics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.042087698183303233,"score_gpt":0.29476792744064856,"score_spread":0.25268022925734535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792807544","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3912062,0.0023036879,0.063292235,0.007968603,0.00018013146,0.00008907864,0.0006843546,0.00053132506,0.53374434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851248,0.00039705483,0.0061213183,0.00033006782,0.000044522872,0.00003979033,0.00023162807,0.00014719665,0.007563549],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983089,0.00067198294,0.0000628138,0.00036968332,0.00037883592,0.00020778937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863774,0.0005890585,0.00012735839,0.00018605584,0.00036579225,0.00009392718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002208064,0.0005754108,0.0005408811,0.0010139637,0.0026308645,0.004990808,0.0009155972,0.0015817011,0.006501275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030486565,0.00046351113,0.00074034336,0.0009275021,0.006330232,0.008039844,0.004950139,0.0019343632,0.0008365736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019973259,0.000056896486,0.0037773727,0.00014468588,0.00002240399,0.0009042553,0.03136165,0.00076601334,0.0034335346,0.9386123,0.0032382105,0.017483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025983425,0.00012791106,0.014886361,0.0004318699,0.000081528444,0.001482418,0.052483033,0.008221923,0.0041608447,0.653764,0.2638521,0.00024824648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029394664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027415171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029394664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005907416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015069951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058447123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887626589","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffy014","title":"The Anatomy of a Comparative Illusion","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":168,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; City University of New York; Andrew W. Mellon Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Ellipsis (linguistics); Linguistics; Computer science; Sentence; Sentence processing; Syntax; Interpretation (philosophy); Parsing; Relative clause; Ambiguity; Semantic interpretation; Perception; Illusion; Natural language processing; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04367541121187906,"score_gpt":0.3601997245122649,"score_spread":0.31652431330038583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887626589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78607666,0.003699314,0.07296684,0.009410787,0.0003069294,0.00007642712,0.00023036024,0.0005505687,0.12668215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991574,0.00039786263,0.005373234,0.0005119053,0.000063739,0.00002114616,0.000042747633,0.00005397827,0.0019613253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992711,0.00022179309,0.000045135654,0.00015345031,0.00021365954,0.00009482911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969568,0.001625104,0.00036949417,0.0006787663,0.00020082537,0.00016894491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008994918,0.00022421767,0.00017837792,0.001233422,0.000674258,0.001742228,0.00055413967,0.0009425356,0.005688288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064843427,0.00022314984,0.0002472456,0.0003494794,0.0059110606,0.0035491416,0.0026444711,0.0019989507,0.00036355562],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006588109,0.00010563707,0.02021,0.00024334625,0.00005289483,0.00743685,0.028051896,0.000577812,0.14762619,0.6087694,0.004691877,0.18157527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009258414,0.0005284805,0.067494646,0.00031567938,0.00007658224,0.05309679,0.011246791,0.0035756822,0.032991894,0.7678952,0.06253147,0.00015418106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043705665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034299234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005688288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045561529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038408296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0190292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900630539","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffz022","title":"Do Children Interpret ‘or’ Conjunctively?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Utterance; Computer science; Replicate; Competence (human resources); Linguistics; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028763155498060963,"score_gpt":0.30816239801185463,"score_spread":0.27939924251379367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900630539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.980228,0.00017523364,0.0027014764,0.00033755702,0.000018647163,0.000019691686,0.00019165114,0.00008556232,0.016242173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966725,0.00012202602,0.0021484047,0.00011173139,0.0000061340074,0.000013727012,0.0001192641,0.0000381203,0.00076797564],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869055,0.00035137878,0.0001244209,0.0003087295,0.00030679005,0.00021819436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939825,0.0033605774,0.0015994759,0.00044474396,0.0004620642,0.00015057386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001284458,0.0005146676,0.00038159936,0.00037509156,0.00028641216,0.0018500393,0.00039768883,0.000978049,0.008196581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008654473,0.00048308176,0.00019429057,0.00037746027,0.0016728897,0.0028524473,0.000887303,0.0008853079,0.0013384102],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013481628,0.00054640236,0.4625149,0.0013152446,0.00015549226,0.006177012,0.119271666,0.0015602367,0.26574013,0.046109967,0.005295345,0.08996551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022247584,0.0009973776,0.58825845,0.00070759334,0.00042330936,0.012990914,0.11729979,0.009720103,0.13567883,0.06989053,0.06352676,0.00028388252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018506901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018785442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008196581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004303544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038393834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027420342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3166326203","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffab007","title":"The Contribution of Gestures to the Semantics of Non-Canonical Questions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Gesture; Presupposition; Rhetorical question; Interpretation (philosophy); Feature (linguistics); Computer science; Context (archaeology); Linguistics; Semantics (computer science); Canonical form; Speech recognition; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022572227749987798,"score_gpt":0.3014186104188582,"score_spread":0.2788463826688704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3166326203","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54336846,0.0016766952,0.28075138,0.0043888353,0.00047298273,0.00015120146,0.00038642253,0.00119091,0.16761313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988817,0.00014366071,0.009315627,0.000084770334,0.00009155331,0.000041616033,0.00008789453,0.00016920816,0.0012486335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99457294,0.0031534988,0.0003343541,0.00067732733,0.00091629184,0.0003457055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99109274,0.0054529277,0.0009773154,0.0010488995,0.0010748686,0.00035316762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003152786,0.0007975891,0.0005149865,0.0019187214,0.0017410617,0.0060010096,0.0010636628,0.0021108114,0.0041763657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01797795,0.000726911,0.00061464444,0.0012194768,0.009541074,0.010727459,0.0046869647,0.0022190963,0.00067603774],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019668454,0.000018670005,0.002531391,0.00029441324,0.000022581682,0.0007759741,0.060873464,0.00080132234,0.015460217,0.89440584,0.00086373783,0.023755748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065315115,0.00016386632,0.007035621,0.0002855757,0.000066159635,0.0017369966,0.034207385,0.017362827,0.01039427,0.87856,0.05000394,0.00011797806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001067649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060010096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014696723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090957317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016673744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186963881","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffab008","title":"Causes and Expectations: On the Interpretation of the Tagalog Ability/Involuntary Action Form","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Circumstantial evidence; Tagalog; Presupposition; Action (physics); Event (particle physics); Interpretation (philosophy); Linguistics; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Psychology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.03860714750207806,"score_gpt":0.26282033183802017,"score_spread":0.22421318433594212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186963881","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34435442,0.00071993,0.22142164,0.014403504,0.00054653373,0.00010138624,0.0006244445,0.0007329419,0.41709515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99362284,0.000079630554,0.0039827814,0.0002470695,0.00007773593,0.000017794908,0.000086727145,0.00012256375,0.001762891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976882,0.0013005127,0.000110586596,0.00036435763,0.00037817334,0.00015809468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960084,0.0024861873,0.00029256617,0.0005968582,0.0004627257,0.00015330591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028025243,0.00050863164,0.00039232895,0.0014246337,0.0015144648,0.004708989,0.0012139624,0.0019643614,0.00876343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00804563,0.00052986294,0.00063914875,0.0008395139,0.011689775,0.008807949,0.003335634,0.0026242377,0.00064380805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032047243,0.000008017948,0.0004922085,0.000024413459,0.0000064478336,0.00019410044,0.0059414306,0.00031055644,0.00046418182,0.98932636,0.0005115573,0.0026886826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028713903,0.000033685792,0.001618351,0.00008309031,0.000022297247,0.00031687223,0.004724403,0.005171392,0.0011311005,0.9710576,0.015770622,0.000041934756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037820567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029316396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00876343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020958341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074812735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029316604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213845739","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffab009","title":"Random Choice from Likelihood: The Case of Chuj (Mayan)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Modality (human–computer interaction); Event (particle physics); Modal; Computer science; Linguistics; Component (thermodynamics); Action (physics); Point (geometry); Modal verb; Verb; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02490790054597536,"score_gpt":0.25125662099820734,"score_spread":0.22634872045223198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213845739","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45584607,0.0007556801,0.024601229,0.020426435,0.00014967818,0.000088495435,0.0002706677,0.00020862668,0.4976531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853895,0.00011110104,0.0039480785,0.0008176382,0.000057098525,0.000034396006,0.000055212,0.000112682115,0.009474377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973732,0.0011368691,0.000070929535,0.0005079045,0.00037663535,0.000534327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99553716,0.0028226995,0.00027527843,0.0005680174,0.00049187226,0.00030486126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038390136,0.00048373744,0.00085984886,0.0012188961,0.0129127875,0.008860155,0.0016046376,0.00643713,0.012027556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008911472,0.0008366199,0.0005715033,0.0015612586,0.01635844,0.0124150235,0.0049607456,0.0067736446,0.0010105761],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045760007,0.000023187898,0.00087816326,0.000023250519,0.000009382894,0.0030725729,0.024289045,0.00022356535,0.0003345271,0.9669517,0.001600117,0.0025487226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058102298,0.00003739821,0.0026813769,0.00013647955,0.00004893049,0.0052574994,0.035052903,0.010837675,0.00082684075,0.8575442,0.08733823,0.00018031149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037282508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043769296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037282508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008387141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024346795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07413095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213336685","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffab012","title":"Monotonicity Revisited: Mass Nouns and Comparisons of Purity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Monotonic function; Measure (data warehouse); Constraint (computer-aided design); Mathematics; Context (archaeology); Noun; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Natural language processing; Data mining; Mathematical analysis; History","score_opus":0.03204469584860422,"score_gpt":0.25848943181099776,"score_spread":0.22644473596239353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213336685","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4583948,0.0029541058,0.14119306,0.0047480813,0.00032734993,0.00011333169,0.00046514982,0.00041291345,0.3913913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991251,0.00016453653,0.006545139,0.00028859248,0.000100952406,0.000043688073,0.00007491064,0.00009456434,0.0014366995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99262404,0.0038772838,0.00044531224,0.0014079561,0.0013313161,0.00031417233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98334473,0.009561081,0.0018128117,0.0023970525,0.002587527,0.00029677417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073609357,0.0006605274,0.00071537966,0.0030163154,0.002265837,0.0045363447,0.0016513625,0.0019688162,0.009446609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03117092,0.00057414855,0.0006920129,0.0023809036,0.009465797,0.018520033,0.0060015246,0.0028885838,0.00065547513],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017491072,0.000021510376,0.0024045664,0.00020779048,0.000037858168,0.00021504704,0.005691304,0.00033758295,0.0043813926,0.97183764,0.0005820313,0.014108417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053006057,0.0001806221,0.013781708,0.00033678886,0.00010033125,0.00093321316,0.005514129,0.004337904,0.006498685,0.94563127,0.022532737,0.000099698686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011626922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008144291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009446609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022685209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053917273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038928807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304774961","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffac011","title":"On the Role of Focus-Sensitivity for a Typology of Presupposition Triggers","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Presupposition; Focus (optics); Sentence; Utterance; Linguistics; Salience (neuroscience); Context (archaeology); Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Psychology; Meaning (existential); Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01642817141062254,"score_gpt":0.28383734505042585,"score_spread":0.2674091736398033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4304774961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9701339,0.00020860873,0.019900016,0.00022777378,0.000023098977,0.00011843848,0.00005268955,0.00006573763,0.009269762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99673045,0.000026814532,0.0030421407,0.000036331337,0.000006707227,0.000036031557,0.000019273211,0.000017857712,0.00008451301],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922661,0.0047168853,0.00049115316,0.001144439,0.0011272528,0.00025418485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8782877,0.10435867,0.00601928,0.008183511,0.0015289169,0.0016219416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011844054,0.00040047953,0.00068853,0.0010119288,0.0008984593,0.0031822748,0.001158606,0.0018009456,0.005401966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04599863,0.0006383528,0.00041899295,0.0005150619,0.0046972353,0.0055385176,0.002478263,0.0013015703,0.0002638811],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015671462,0.0016432137,0.11853023,0.0019006095,0.000398818,0.0020912697,0.031926174,0.0053886976,0.58381355,0.14990279,0.0003878848,0.088345274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016721736,0.0074359803,0.41148868,0.00041426672,0.0010776767,0.005755647,0.024027776,0.05247139,0.29223606,0.19611299,0.0065421364,0.0007652804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034094497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002593921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011844054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008415146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003558777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062638104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362456789","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffad001","title":"Copredication and Meaning Transfer","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Reinterpretation; Sentence; Philosophy; Predicate (mathematical logic); Property (philosophy); Interpretation (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Linguistics; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07281292118925622,"score_gpt":0.2725259959081947,"score_spread":0.19971307471893848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362456789","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25804844,0.004492026,0.2873942,0.019721318,0.0015544619,0.00019574414,0.00048211502,0.001437281,0.42667434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822391,0.00031762506,0.0077402224,0.00091891555,0.00024062986,0.000044434983,0.00013260599,0.00014323392,0.008223237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704736,0.0013486838,0.00021763332,0.000675812,0.00046751768,0.00024304535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957748,0.0016710403,0.00042831388,0.0012577397,0.0007424583,0.00012561723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029924945,0.00058843294,0.00052391697,0.00090676965,0.0017231535,0.0029840984,0.0014232709,0.00158146,0.006237809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007177466,0.00046218486,0.000580465,0.00083322596,0.010788378,0.007262413,0.004604464,0.0041319584,0.00075830315],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050008595,0.000013384136,0.000321488,0.000090620124,0.0000122588735,0.0004648768,0.007645286,0.00024835634,0.0017956328,0.97791153,0.0019454563,0.009501044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032940785,0.000058823964,0.0013250972,0.00015399986,0.000056681376,0.00085113983,0.0027779746,0.0033025872,0.0055596433,0.90605456,0.07977006,0.00005652499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001085754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005222681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006237809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028207412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006553071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020867527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387516844","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffad006","title":"Metaphorical Uses of Proper Names and the Continuity Hypothesis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Phenomenon; Class (philosophy); Proper noun; Literal (mathematical logic); Set (abstract data type); Spell; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03683111468613496,"score_gpt":0.294148250420926,"score_spread":0.25731713573479104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387516844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48831818,0.002724504,0.29751423,0.01407804,0.00043155506,0.00008646219,0.00021653862,0.0003539092,0.19627662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99356705,0.000121161385,0.00512942,0.00014175472,0.000046112837,0.000014183118,0.00001729845,0.000021646625,0.0009415101],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923407,0.0050224024,0.00030982602,0.0008358999,0.0011714041,0.00031987776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98821825,0.0076501234,0.001093002,0.0018472921,0.0009268106,0.00026455568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053542024,0.00027652385,0.00047366982,0.0017807828,0.0021934626,0.004175313,0.0013560861,0.0018806288,0.004173757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0139342835,0.0004047609,0.0003986303,0.0013496887,0.021715844,0.017012043,0.0049688206,0.0024138694,0.00027247265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023570621,0.000007306456,0.00038627532,0.000032443713,0.000005024432,0.00009255241,0.004957646,0.00011138429,0.00043766116,0.9909277,0.00024699242,0.0027716013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001638014,0.000026427699,0.0009986411,0.00005649928,0.00001045288,0.0003236179,0.005711991,0.0020882278,0.0009159236,0.97869325,0.011136069,0.000022413416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005590114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035306695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053542024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015008522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062207395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028316021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387805757","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffad008","title":"Spanish Bare Interrogatives and Number","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Massachusetts Amherst; Université de Nantes","keywords":"Linguistics; Inference; Plural; Computer science; Range (aeronautics); Mathematics; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03708987663570877,"score_gpt":0.27133517628696063,"score_spread":0.23424529965125185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387805757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50197047,0.005511862,0.052233804,0.01100531,0.0007531366,0.000053790525,0.0012181641,0.00044380807,0.42680967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99093974,0.00028703117,0.0021616726,0.0004871592,0.000120185774,0.00001851226,0.00024504808,0.00012536402,0.005615238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971513,0.0015909635,0.00018968494,0.00051643554,0.00038270594,0.00016888556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99416757,0.003036177,0.00049598014,0.0006588037,0.0015169343,0.0001244353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032852807,0.0006367381,0.0006716823,0.0012518836,0.0019833369,0.0039119334,0.0011468503,0.0011779907,0.006412975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008981697,0.00039258797,0.0004826415,0.0013128765,0.006882754,0.0052252756,0.00516168,0.0014496413,0.00078150345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030117473,0.000041310177,0.004703395,0.0003491543,0.0000603462,0.00076587556,0.01912066,0.00048813928,0.0038119175,0.9508399,0.0044165365,0.015101595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007599548,0.000081013044,0.0144753065,0.00033006558,0.00007108366,0.000684626,0.014953013,0.0023165005,0.004534238,0.8095143,0.15280229,0.00016175768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007987753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048637255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007987753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035159413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007021383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025510073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391987585","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffae001","title":"THE HELL with questions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Natural Language Processing Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Outstanding Youth Science Fund Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China; Universität Konstanz","keywords":"Doxastic logic; Computer science; Semantics (computer science); Class (philosophy); Domain (mathematical analysis); Linguistics; Cognitive dissonance; Semantic property; Expression (computer science); Epistemology; Philosophy; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Mathematics; Programming language; Social psychology","score_opus":0.006740377960851957,"score_gpt":0.24271406674964655,"score_spread":0.2359736887887946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391987585","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06209521,0.009657736,0.40505022,0.049239773,0.0019782865,0.00022187506,0.00069878995,0.00049557,0.47056258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93929136,0.0025235612,0.027891004,0.0058399923,0.00087383523,0.00016882058,0.0003371529,0.00023109876,0.022843119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99475265,0.0034129785,0.00023803502,0.0006777175,0.0006452989,0.00027335627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99427986,0.0037232493,0.0003477301,0.0007400174,0.00072368677,0.00018540758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006044522,0.0006143908,0.00066208415,0.0018629798,0.0022644901,0.004865406,0.0013331955,0.002764814,0.010166174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0124197425,0.0003538204,0.0008806772,0.0014866769,0.014358892,0.017426131,0.0040592486,0.0040931534,0.0011210222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008859722,0.000003537687,0.000078918936,0.000034035445,0.000004769485,0.000035110083,0.0011542205,0.00009412619,0.00012427194,0.9950578,0.0008670765,0.002537219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056219264,0.000007293522,0.00014326394,0.000061424376,0.0000065643794,0.000102629245,0.0011461711,0.00056667684,0.00031667252,0.95645034,0.041182876,0.00001046375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013589192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00077784766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010166174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002110477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010473626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03400922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401797277","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffae002","title":"Co-predications and the quantificational force of summative predicates","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Calgary","keywords":"Summative assessment; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy; Mathematics; Mathematics education; Formative assessment","score_opus":0.015507551855133757,"score_gpt":0.2792327989883482,"score_spread":0.26372524713321444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401797277","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52543014,0.0018745168,0.27508822,0.006493807,0.00027554913,0.00009227953,0.00038716593,0.0005548018,0.18980354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936603,0.000107934145,0.0043194843,0.00017061066,0.000096067764,0.000020936865,0.00004434634,0.00004233697,0.0015379897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967386,0.0012311992,0.00020697007,0.0006134052,0.0008440172,0.00036580412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899476,0.0068105995,0.0009875863,0.0009336022,0.0010201621,0.00030031323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052159796,0.00047828906,0.0005716831,0.0017686564,0.0028301468,0.002607238,0.0008387483,0.001049653,0.0040928307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00930741,0.00052122003,0.00068758475,0.0013806275,0.013329386,0.013143538,0.0054982547,0.0020519998,0.00033041282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007144224,0.000018707286,0.0015022161,0.00006565757,0.000029631747,0.00020880246,0.0036381222,0.00033243792,0.0022123293,0.98511744,0.00057141285,0.006231874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002645188,0.000037548692,0.0038200058,0.00007087909,0.00008355477,0.00029689056,0.001978462,0.0032157174,0.005336893,0.9720462,0.013047816,0.000039699356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016864906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013415624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052159796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018422665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071464956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02758503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405371696","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffae016","title":"Competence by default: do listeners assume that speakers are knowledgeable when computing conversational inferences?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of California, San Diego","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Computer science; Linguistics; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.053508135629294115,"score_gpt":0.28640568935631794,"score_spread":0.2328975537270238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405371696","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97527766,0.00014636922,0.015701786,0.00083801046,0.000018703464,0.000032347674,0.00007964493,0.000116536896,0.0077889934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99845195,0.000035859724,0.0012329298,0.00008035879,0.000007764771,0.0000073397123,0.000030549138,0.0000121591665,0.00014113713],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99439466,0.0019573863,0.0004969583,0.0013540366,0.0013123135,0.00048459243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94884104,0.032886505,0.0063887783,0.006227002,0.004077992,0.0015786109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008032178,0.00036525086,0.0005207138,0.0006372192,0.000775203,0.0042960662,0.0010667716,0.0018569555,0.0043800776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08092286,0.0009564161,0.00035575643,0.00022158852,0.003973989,0.008478178,0.002468396,0.0024242764,0.00055334874],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0045091906,0.00071009144,0.27600655,0.0010150436,0.00048361145,0.0036856874,0.27401492,0.0036265985,0.2876584,0.046113502,0.0015599435,0.10061654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042656445,0.0021562579,0.49595192,0.0008542756,0.00073439983,0.004980376,0.10496559,0.05774105,0.09249645,0.22849727,0.010409756,0.00078614114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030783215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014620542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008032178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061681756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061115914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04247868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415221415","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffaf009","title":"Uncentered attitude reports","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Class (philosophy); Variation (astronomy); Tuple; Positive attitude; Contrast (vision); Possible world","score_opus":0.025336385730779912,"score_gpt":0.2648575456086577,"score_spread":0.2395211598778778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415221415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33302024,0.002064427,0.032739967,0.006180663,0.00096832745,0.00012272704,0.005799262,0.0013975028,0.61770695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9561405,0.0004909911,0.004211297,0.000455348,0.00025975794,0.00003786695,0.002260063,0.00018469077,0.035959505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99547076,0.001518752,0.00032474732,0.0006762986,0.0016953311,0.00031411415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97037685,0.011074067,0.0038881586,0.00581016,0.008044069,0.00080680125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004132461,0.00039545432,0.00031631868,0.002912954,0.0014009565,0.0036728631,0.00084071833,0.0009724189,0.026470838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025695516,0.00023376264,0.00018357072,0.002709022,0.0016838064,0.0033768725,0.0029707854,0.0014128844,0.005568124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067316374,0.00014269962,0.05469688,0.00035919424,0.000090712056,0.0017407564,0.042413954,0.00045334816,0.0043318504,0.60910326,0.06590364,0.22009051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050586605,0.0001356492,0.07291373,0.00052222144,0.00011771657,0.0028384824,0.030556137,0.002782416,0.01013729,0.15847751,0.7213241,0.00014431067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030385589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018734648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026470838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015232902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048287367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08855379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416386223","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffaf010","title":"Re-thinking the Agent Control Hypothesis: inanimate subjects without a change of state","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Jacobs Research Funds","keywords":"Constraint (computer-aided design); Construals; Control (management); State (computer science)","score_opus":0.047962636114527196,"score_gpt":0.2592862053462565,"score_spread":0.21132356923172932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416386223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5171645,0.00028929953,0.09578554,0.0077380897,0.00024314995,0.000094430376,0.00038545526,0.0005822044,0.3777173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993932,0.000031374097,0.002291924,0.00031289607,0.0000522831,0.000020375872,0.00009003727,0.00009710592,0.0031720893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979972,0.00079002406,0.000119583536,0.0005254854,0.00038863416,0.000178941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933755,0.0029290589,0.00056505785,0.0021982864,0.00067235425,0.00025966202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035557935,0.0003578298,0.00057071075,0.00077993853,0.0014643666,0.003225615,0.0010295621,0.0012491364,0.014681039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007934097,0.00036210526,0.0006106016,0.0005507045,0.011072207,0.009333122,0.0032407886,0.0025751905,0.0009186552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006088489,0.000023997734,0.0014973433,0.000035103538,0.000011613835,0.00012836668,0.006627062,0.00014567589,0.0016996816,0.9854351,0.0008658118,0.0034693894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097925695,0.00006215295,0.0041646217,0.000051053114,0.000038817612,0.00034212496,0.0040778317,0.0031984353,0.0027151615,0.9678005,0.0174061,0.00004527941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035169001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027394772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014681039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013988802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049112976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417303712","doi":"10.1093/jos/ffaf011","title":"Children interpret some disjunctions conjunctively: Evidence from child Romanian","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Semantics","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Leibniz-Gemeinschaft; Universitatea din București; Western Sydney University; Connaught Fund; Macquarie University; Universität Wien; University of Toronto; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Simple (philosophy); Markedness; Statement (logic); Romanian; Confusion; Artifact (error); Value (mathematics)","score_opus":0.00966774024050433,"score_gpt":0.2930286739224382,"score_spread":0.2833609336819339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417303712","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97801876,0.00065597874,0.00090115797,0.0002884891,0.000020166679,0.000028255932,0.00022736966,0.000037717124,0.01982193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968964,0.00042244606,0.0012662755,0.00020631264,0.00001348666,0.000042777174,0.00021929092,0.00005465229,0.00087836536],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99600405,0.0012118927,0.0003564173,0.00095035863,0.0010771244,0.00040012258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886318,0.005361826,0.0029770003,0.001430795,0.0013287865,0.0002697841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034327882,0.00072147883,0.0007848069,0.00091980206,0.0012296564,0.0028005436,0.0010667762,0.0011593959,0.0106387595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02142426,0.0012136817,0.0004441263,0.0008084652,0.0046012197,0.0035988737,0.0026090876,0.002153251,0.001626323],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015227818,0.0006670669,0.30349138,0.0022089307,0.00024071593,0.014393275,0.49254575,0.0005332526,0.08138811,0.021023115,0.0042060935,0.077779576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034793495,0.0009573304,0.69971704,0.0011411938,0.0003732936,0.025077187,0.15135232,0.0016679993,0.037364062,0.012745619,0.06878456,0.000471491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053601125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067167985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0106387595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075856555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055371097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03559023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}