{"meta":{"query_hash":"6d17b6904320","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Social Policy"},"cohort_total":52,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":52,"exported":52,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/6d17b6904320","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Social+Policy"},"results":[{"id":"W1552002249","doi":"10.1017/s0047279413000573","title":"In the Shadow of the Welfare State: The Role of Payday Lending in Poverty Survival in Australia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Victoria Park","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Welfare; Shadow (psychology); Workfare; Welfare state; Social policy; Economics; Corporate governance; Mainstream; Development economics; Economic growth; Political science; Market economy; Finance; Politics","score_opus":0.02676762475283097,"score_gpt":0.2608657748437696,"score_spread":0.23409815009093862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552002249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9793561,0.00082574907,0.00082749757,0.009750523,0.000022267917,0.000014391487,0.000053281503,0.000003308079,0.009146876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99889463,0.00022236745,0.00006138126,0.00008423101,0.00001122138,0.0000037464308,0.0000069623993,9.3576404e-7,0.00071459735],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991948,0.00040290822,0.000022043645,0.00006152279,0.000082819075,0.0002359035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970693,0.000983577,0.0007232477,0.00004976337,0.00042359554,0.00075053534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015156486,0.00011104797,0.0003299026,0.0007538386,0.0014104592,0.0028003864,0.00048818372,0.00078418717,0.0037594584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004128879,0.00012794559,0.0001835879,0.0006939258,0.0030272664,0.0022641367,0.0040155323,0.0017601261,0.00011768802],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032001248,0.0007780194,0.49151626,0.00034879267,0.000113402726,0.0027858522,0.04817672,0.008212005,0.0008334975,0.3686622,0.008707481,0.069545686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004120091,0.0003649344,0.6464178,0.0006739611,0.00013109192,0.00034935912,0.10335632,0.04644825,0.0005652045,0.17640547,0.025183214,0.00006322509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06571341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07382404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06571341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041538365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029921688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13066185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968521477","doi":"10.1017/s004727941200044x","title":"Ann Oakley (2011), A Critical Woman: Barbara Wootton, Social Science and Public Policy in the Twentieth Century. London: Bloomsbury Academic. £30, pp. 426, hbk.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Media studies; Content (measure theory); Political science; Library science; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06174836366260211,"score_gpt":0.39728705842322676,"score_spread":0.33553869476062465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968521477","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032056833,0.8249012,0.0007030095,0.15971015,0.0047564856,0.00002381522,0.00014146033,0.00005692482,0.00938631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012761463,0.8451699,0.002687462,0.052876487,0.0040834052,0.00012409147,0.00016771875,0.00019707144,0.08193233],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869007,0.00060439244,0.0000880745,0.0001308492,0.00038955617,0.00009706867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994749,0.0033037213,0.00048640725,0.00011484483,0.0008062881,0.00053977896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048453105,0.0019234639,0.00113634,0.0030355053,0.0045966688,0.0066444706,0.0021776306,0.0074539552,0.027309554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009251605,0.0016944791,0.00046741733,0.0052847993,0.0042758123,0.014205355,0.0025831442,0.0078713875,0.012583343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021943228,0.000009885335,0.00011341773,0.00031660398,0.000005265511,0.000058854257,0.001140566,0.00003413631,0.000049918006,0.005654043,0.96587247,0.026722874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021021537,0.000010270337,0.0011602788,0.0038013703,0.00001896054,0.00018204607,0.0035507118,0.00007395948,0.0001594631,0.023188056,0.9678009,0.000032849657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039128996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13999979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039128996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046335324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072475253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.091359615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983549816","doi":"10.1017/s004727940700133x","title":"Spalek Basia (2006), Crime Victims: Theory, Policy and Practice, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. £19.99, pp.200, pbk.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Crime, Deviance, and Social Control","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Law and economics","score_opus":0.019553922979788627,"score_gpt":0.36531210724309576,"score_spread":0.3457581842633071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983549816","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013397963,0.8722918,0.0018642113,0.046594616,0.0017407732,0.000039827264,0.001019769,0.00027075925,0.07483847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02490129,0.8311652,0.0020750156,0.0042533292,0.0005310226,0.00014727504,0.00064127723,0.00023258927,0.136053],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999416,0.00018200409,0.00005618643,0.00006602592,0.00018843345,0.000091270136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878126,0.0006605195,0.00013798948,0.000054100154,0.0001749495,0.00019119594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017528766,0.0013240807,0.0011969181,0.0024807116,0.0013198296,0.0043007517,0.0011995592,0.0027905167,0.081559606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029671083,0.0015006178,0.00036555534,0.0048874575,0.0027619873,0.005713571,0.0021975657,0.0030012054,0.029700123],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002959339,0.000015721473,0.00039476034,0.0010421022,0.000012074908,0.00011669671,0.0024231751,0.00023442303,0.00010595274,0.022936929,0.81748646,0.15520214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010519566,0.000012954474,0.0023898496,0.0021050288,0.000013317496,0.00025599555,0.0023194186,0.000099623605,0.000104635394,0.018721987,0.9739449,0.000021718197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027746756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09329327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.081559606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035853754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006091234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27284402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003363669","doi":"10.1017/s0047279407001043","title":"Assessing the Capacity of Pension Institutions to Build and Sustain Trust: A Multidimensional Conceptual Framework","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Pension; Salient; Foundation (evidence); Conceptual framework; Business; Process (computing); Conceptual model; Empirical research; Empirical evidence; Public relations; The Conceptual Framework; Private pension; Public economics; Accounting; Economics; Political science; Finance; Sociology","score_opus":0.062754094543284,"score_gpt":0.40876203536723993,"score_spread":0.3460079408239559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003363669","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8475249,0.0013003735,0.09246935,0.007929683,0.00004102319,0.0004528746,0.00036407806,0.0000958395,0.049821913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958032,0.00012198016,0.0038390087,0.000023335004,0.000005302869,0.00007513332,0.000036239086,0.00000213173,0.00009368648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98094845,0.010953256,0.0020946693,0.0010684596,0.0031071198,0.0018280225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93089783,0.036121044,0.018074935,0.004930059,0.005357189,0.0046189516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022010447,0.00054192456,0.0006444719,0.0080070915,0.002891233,0.009587716,0.0014789313,0.00243155,0.0016501859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06384061,0.00031847952,0.0008174061,0.004299104,0.012600045,0.012995054,0.010284374,0.0013677523,0.00013783379],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020164605,0.00032197757,0.14072193,0.0005251132,0.000302667,0.00039386607,0.039797436,0.01956988,0.000960294,0.7314115,0.001188125,0.06460551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007654288,0.0006556616,0.12614124,0.00094660866,0.00022780287,0.00053057465,0.05445074,0.07637516,0.0013806405,0.7262454,0.012677424,0.00029229693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035381569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021630249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022010447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073497673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042042956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11640376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024383087","doi":"10.1017/s0047279413000056","title":"Fairness and the Politics of Resentment","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Blackberry (Canada)","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Resentment; Populism; Austerity; Reactionary; Politics; Political economy; Welfare; Political science; Punitive damages; Framing (construction); Feeling; Sociology; Social psychology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.021949857809580503,"score_gpt":0.34793724005419996,"score_spread":0.32598738224461943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024383087","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25683296,0.00353227,0.016771562,0.06989401,0.00082738366,0.000047520734,0.000034475208,0.00005880391,0.652001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99439055,0.00014424854,0.0002953531,0.0013571985,0.00011281423,0.000011391845,0.0000030831886,0.000014070943,0.0036712305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9739212,0.019298337,0.00037625496,0.0016400684,0.0024576413,0.0023065046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98242235,0.011738593,0.0022123405,0.001276744,0.0014307462,0.00091906067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018423894,0.000362078,0.000359991,0.0012537875,0.008336961,0.008786934,0.00096824527,0.0040961034,0.003961446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023403466,0.00027513402,0.00042606812,0.00089038746,0.05246741,0.00504188,0.0064883647,0.0048880815,0.00044384698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051281102,0.000024752037,0.0014558233,0.000043057677,0.000012229623,0.00017868812,0.04924612,0.00021050952,0.00047521194,0.93838066,0.0021772229,0.007744435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045821,0.00008768378,0.007868072,0.00037238287,0.000026965305,0.00029145594,0.058525305,0.0008747627,0.0012944526,0.7474644,0.18306993,0.00007872196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033677164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002188014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018423894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064913565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023319088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09743607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028034825","doi":"10.1017/s0047279407241029","title":"Macnicol, J. (2006) <i>Age Discrimination: An Historical and Contemporary Analysis</i>, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 308, £17.99, pbk","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Media studies; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.024936288417759987,"score_gpt":0.2988154865513938,"score_spread":0.2738791981336338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028034825","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009798558,0.9216951,0.0011190252,0.034433376,0.0026545345,0.000018676643,0.0010900985,0.00007000033,0.037939332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02857078,0.881362,0.0028741502,0.0040410683,0.0026591292,0.0000732219,0.0009421414,0.00016405707,0.07931346],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99970335,0.000057807305,0.000028403392,0.000033523535,0.00014197349,0.000034978075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99785256,0.0011755377,0.00018978432,0.00007731512,0.0005161831,0.00018875186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011659825,0.00094121194,0.0006345916,0.004238869,0.0016738877,0.003038664,0.0016578606,0.0018006251,0.05987796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004226784,0.00065991393,0.00035887514,0.0066100303,0.0018262784,0.0061878418,0.001224129,0.0024095753,0.014215341],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030171028,0.000007100382,0.00061099185,0.00050235534,0.000009849607,0.000058875605,0.0011658416,0.00006208779,0.00008855039,0.010763465,0.8404638,0.14623691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065197773,0.000015010145,0.01077734,0.0022063507,0.000019008452,0.00037800282,0.0023546866,0.00006544062,0.0001455868,0.013911433,0.97009856,0.000022038314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04205574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11313047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05987796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023554896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020740267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20031172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030565705","doi":"10.1017/s0047279411000572","title":"Intimate Relationships as Routes into and out of Homelessness: Insights from a Canadian City","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Perception; Sociology; Psychology; Criminology; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Medicine; Environmental health","score_opus":0.09065526225016392,"score_gpt":0.39496754573388876,"score_spread":0.30431228348372485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030565705","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9762102,0.0011522986,0.00013065986,0.0046798373,0.00005631838,0.000077056684,0.00017101577,0.000006851292,0.017515823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99207777,0.002217601,0.00012529583,0.0010007132,0.000016256778,0.00002700317,0.000082427985,0.00001162653,0.0044414364],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967012,0.0009344482,0.000058144316,0.00015123299,0.00048510445,0.0016699601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970451,0.0007096144,0.00028563922,0.00007309076,0.0005616307,0.0013250392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002541679,0.00063396565,0.00078498945,0.0030922822,0.049326073,0.007207054,0.0025863673,0.0017848527,0.004533482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040318994,0.00064795103,0.0004393983,0.005755516,0.010608373,0.0025846693,0.007851337,0.004661053,0.00028813988],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002181723,0.000051149153,0.0109373145,0.00004959116,0.000005149487,0.0008237326,0.9804034,0.000039276892,0.00010999993,0.0016495639,0.0015263875,0.004382561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016449931,0.000008763416,0.0063452083,0.00005912275,0.0000033436274,0.000057958645,0.9886961,0.000020644302,0.00001251418,0.000073677125,0.0047141584,0.000006795599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98248833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9934549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064807154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.064807154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0738265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47021103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035853200","doi":"10.1017/s0047279400235897","title":"Jacques T. Godbout in collaboration with Alan Caille, <i>The World of the Gift</i>, McGill-Queens University Press, London, 1998, viii + 250 pp., £29.95 pbk.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Historical and Architectural Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Media studies; Sociology; Law and economics; Art","score_opus":0.009705560259922861,"score_gpt":0.21065128236205707,"score_spread":0.2009457221021342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035853200","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007588726,0.64700526,0.0011473516,0.25347105,0.023823254,0.00006555627,0.00043702702,0.00032431513,0.072967365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01303221,0.37650013,0.0031822068,0.035283137,0.009039395,0.00011389074,0.0004873054,0.00041350524,0.56194824],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992899,0.00015564631,0.000031443564,0.00014013454,0.00031081995,0.000072131705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99674535,0.0012398089,0.00024183112,0.00006841963,0.0008501836,0.00085438415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021312535,0.0012138966,0.000653175,0.0021273103,0.0032251687,0.003561177,0.0010211791,0.002547686,0.0798399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006026426,0.00038739355,0.00030508413,0.0024833146,0.0012447727,0.0045420653,0.001726105,0.003100659,0.03019138],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010677301,0.000005957021,0.00005121528,0.00014075574,0.0000020967545,0.00003177083,0.00031199242,0.00002054856,0.00004061137,0.0013648749,0.97922015,0.018799271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035677858,0.000004725935,0.00037132503,0.00027213222,0.0000028619995,0.00011358611,0.0008039053,0.000022387303,0.00006289078,0.00096229685,0.9973737,0.000006643075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04345663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09952394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0798399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025067565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034476747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2670911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070660254","doi":"10.1017/s0047279410000516","title":"Changes in Parental Assets and Children's Educational Outcomes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Asset (computer security); Premise; Reading (process); Perspective (graphical); Dimension (graph theory); Psychology; Developmental psychology; Economics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.03150442508899462,"score_gpt":0.40894676501517274,"score_spread":0.37744233992617815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070660254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977076,0.00010457021,0.00011235019,0.00010036289,0.0000025541938,0.0000026754246,0.0010196925,0.000005617911,0.000944605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99901974,0.000058130034,0.000048434442,0.0000043917344,0.0000018940276,0.0000025367888,0.00059977884,0.0000011191016,0.00026387963],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946314,0.00015386129,0.000048723683,0.00008609256,0.00012528793,0.00012288164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99260676,0.0028181064,0.0029181284,0.00048082267,0.00045712752,0.0007191539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012865823,0.00018462095,0.000220916,0.00080832577,0.00037169678,0.001363054,0.00029318803,0.00028427446,0.005063012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076420363,0.00012939285,0.00028987438,0.0014374665,0.0005508502,0.00062408973,0.0008848858,0.0006811237,0.00041402553],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023811675,0.000016364665,0.9973236,0.0000047411313,0.000029385974,0.000046268255,0.00016763028,0.00035109802,0.00003466502,0.00030469472,0.000101482256,0.0015963141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012138242,0.000018448083,0.9986457,0.000008289953,0.000009346128,0.00002825564,0.00038680778,0.00044081075,0.00006496067,0.0001748689,0.00021837483,0.0000030524527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037125524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030325297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037125524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086128956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006021047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07381886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081947733","doi":"10.1017/s0047279406280541","title":"S. Lace (ed.) 2005, <i>The Glass Consumer: Life in a Surveillance Society</i>, Policy Press, Bristol, 259 pp., £12.99 pbk","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Media studies; Political science; Sociology; Gerontology; Medicine","score_opus":0.018075735157652498,"score_gpt":0.3082048134407643,"score_spread":0.2901290782831118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081947733","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003426939,0.922343,0.0018982376,0.017110825,0.007322595,0.000033224896,0.0007504142,0.00025345484,0.0499456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020901272,0.9074327,0.0022310356,0.0019417931,0.0019281257,0.00003588546,0.00078554475,0.00009238997,0.0834624],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996203,0.00007093988,0.000037670066,0.00005898732,0.0001814347,0.000030610274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897635,0.00038637532,0.00010563916,0.000027470665,0.0002606041,0.00024364589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013144534,0.0019698453,0.0011235805,0.0021996233,0.0007117121,0.0033875417,0.001188288,0.0021667741,0.095422216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022839492,0.0008358534,0.00037881968,0.0029585736,0.0004880648,0.0050036423,0.0011683322,0.0018626517,0.10215549],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025338155,0.000010751957,0.00014159604,0.00093217107,0.0000075886046,0.000050418963,0.0001631804,0.00009555829,0.0000858121,0.00083320116,0.7519838,0.24567051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005494511,0.000013795623,0.000667559,0.0018047639,0.000014992627,0.0003978298,0.0002764055,0.000082693026,0.00011130259,0.00095328985,0.9956571,0.000014886909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008785119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023562431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.095422216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010262413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024129613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3192191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097845821","doi":"10.1017/s0047279411000821","title":"The Discursive Turn in Policy Analysis and the Validation of Policy Stories","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University","keywords":"Narrative; Presentation (obstetrics); Context (archaeology); Narrative inquiry; Identification (biology); Strengths and weaknesses; Field (mathematics); Focus (optics); Key (lock); Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Linguistics; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; History; Medicine","score_opus":0.09848772467763912,"score_gpt":0.5212652790576524,"score_spread":0.4227775543800133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097845821","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56382483,0.007294389,0.0900044,0.118664525,0.0012486633,0.00059344573,0.0007969457,0.00016137351,0.21741147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908049,0.0006642417,0.006178431,0.00063549436,0.00009508823,0.00019620647,0.00010162975,0.000054073247,0.0012699862],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.66085833,0.31016287,0.006309039,0.0051056724,0.0141682755,0.0033958424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3454005,0.59289443,0.02203274,0.022348579,0.015506565,0.001817222],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.19942072,0.0010461281,0.0012384092,0.012185445,0.011320136,0.027594134,0.0043255542,0.004669566,0.0050117867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.38193792,0.0010588267,0.00074285717,0.011329376,0.08420649,0.034796935,0.014964389,0.0067015653,0.0004528014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001644523,0.000041098847,0.003434183,0.00043980769,0.00004150668,0.00050473417,0.54806703,0.00077872735,0.00023640311,0.42484224,0.0019910051,0.019458741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046966983,0.00007793785,0.0036109986,0.0029558062,0.00004505014,0.0003319344,0.52951497,0.0032627303,0.0019286576,0.3640163,0.094116025,0.000092677685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077964845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042908415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19942072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020030169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010946781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98725677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101407006","doi":"10.1017/s004727941500029x","title":"Welfare Capitalism in Crisis: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Labour Market Policy Responses to the Great Recession","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Recession; Economics; Welfare state; Capitalism; Welfare; Politics; Welfare reform; Market economy; Macroeconomics; Political science","score_opus":0.10665310902743415,"score_gpt":0.4878321691311469,"score_spread":0.3811790601037128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101407006","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9841743,0.0004236129,0.0007130864,0.0020693843,0.000029472869,0.00008126296,0.00019623477,0.000003990237,0.012308573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99817574,0.00034966719,0.00020078366,0.0001906659,0.000005958272,0.00008903818,0.00004937427,0.0000049027963,0.0009339454],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99571925,0.0033599287,0.00007693073,0.000109017004,0.0002358678,0.00049902516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99440813,0.0044825794,0.00039562868,0.00011058712,0.00038708773,0.00021608917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006601991,0.00018930362,0.00039292703,0.0027576224,0.0052104206,0.0029217657,0.00077425834,0.00093021366,0.0055884463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008237555,0.0002170093,0.00020851893,0.0037288072,0.007012948,0.0027395475,0.0035055003,0.001151223,0.00015469638],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006121863,0.00004050845,0.0059595406,0.00021009086,0.0000073484603,0.0005087412,0.97618914,0.00013660394,0.00053096167,0.010356772,0.00074322143,0.005255829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015089219,0.000011827213,0.0043375636,0.00008010187,0.0000014266906,0.000027646216,0.99258196,0.000044841854,0.0000608006,0.00044445225,0.0024043974,0.000003436156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019647704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043145247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019647704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007225652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00382883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05242598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109650663","doi":"10.1017/s0047279410000279","title":"Cycling Off and On Welfare in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Welfare; Earnings; Work (physics); Labour economics; Demographic economics; Survey of Income and Program Participation; Welfare reform; Social assistance; Economics; Economic growth; Market economy; Finance","score_opus":0.030509947190575443,"score_gpt":0.4066198591508839,"score_spread":0.37610991196030846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109650663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97181207,0.0010962881,0.00007517261,0.0044021956,0.00008022148,0.00010756843,0.005954384,0.000015029117,0.016457085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831964,0.0012558295,0.00014922484,0.001040097,0.000019176543,0.0000457702,0.0022815012,0.000011416696,0.012000466],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99716455,0.00013878652,0.000058486472,0.00018409317,0.00060611946,0.0018479951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713373,0.00010825764,0.0002534278,0.000052458425,0.0009294506,0.0015226679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070513645,0.0002946019,0.00058008754,0.0019273015,0.010358816,0.003975248,0.0016312203,0.0009459755,0.0074321954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021147532,0.00031584164,0.0006194164,0.0055127474,0.0017251602,0.00087975163,0.0035150961,0.0023277225,0.00043471874],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031765748,0.00037066537,0.83507365,0.00024590798,0.000096577714,0.0010060932,0.05798225,0.0005987886,0.0005995295,0.0065425173,0.026742544,0.070423804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019748355,0.00009239045,0.86321145,0.00031414296,0.00003295735,0.00012261067,0.09260257,0.00044824707,0.00016213639,0.00043048302,0.04248544,0.00007773611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9980907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08556325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08556325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12747842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62080777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113353196","doi":"10.1017/s0047279402006815","title":"Richard Titmuss and Social Policy","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Social policy; Welfare; Social Welfare; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0508148518527148,"score_gpt":0.36777960708031765,"score_spread":0.31696475522760287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113353196","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00068307744,0.2633079,0.00061703427,0.65958697,0.0062716105,0.00002283834,0.000036929385,0.00003429013,0.06943936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1061348,0.3546432,0.004277003,0.27937064,0.018840345,0.00031801086,0.00011909252,0.0001832472,0.23611371],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99173534,0.004732673,0.00027328418,0.00084323494,0.0015829084,0.00083258835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99689686,0.0018601316,0.0002293596,0.00018254988,0.00041123384,0.00041994138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007417496,0.0011413634,0.0011362236,0.0018214934,0.006003664,0.0061704246,0.0010517646,0.014045489,0.008022392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012453458,0.0005438572,0.00069801847,0.0028682589,0.01690254,0.008307752,0.003986221,0.008753585,0.0027722165],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016891854,0.00001496023,0.00012234236,0.00018842185,0.000010222647,0.00007653201,0.0020825076,0.00028563687,0.0000336759,0.44607964,0.52597433,0.02511485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009193382,0.000010109501,0.00023659969,0.0005840742,0.0000035127837,0.00006169347,0.0011205415,0.00007717011,0.000023742843,0.1821722,0.8156878,0.000013345788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029406568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036105648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029406568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008567188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014116852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06215954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114420595","doi":"10.1017/s0047279407001481","title":"Neighbourhood Ethnic Concentration and Discrimination","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnic group; Locale (computer software); Immigration; Neighbourhood (mathematics); Demographic economics; Ethnic discrimination; Ethnically diverse; Chinese americans; Sociology; Geography; Psychology; Demography; Economics","score_opus":0.029279539367179218,"score_gpt":0.3817823398580842,"score_spread":0.352502800490905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114420595","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99842346,0.00008017325,0.000028402788,0.00006685948,0.0000035495173,0.000003462607,0.00006600125,8.2212995e-7,0.0013273164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996351,0.000047809062,0.000028200837,0.000008062388,0.000002684692,0.0000034712557,0.000050428334,4.5904704e-7,0.00022361535],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995809,0.00012102172,0.00002716581,0.000050615432,0.00010564374,0.000114594295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792683,0.00021946401,0.0009024247,0.00009746962,0.0002245519,0.00062917406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030556356,0.00022037911,0.0002188238,0.0007307896,0.0019084812,0.0010454337,0.0004054356,0.00032043355,0.0033983174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002490264,0.00012274888,0.00030264776,0.0011214403,0.00073499157,0.00040876318,0.0015500432,0.00040214925,0.00022315687],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034585475,0.00004993711,0.99512625,0.000015736114,0.000028130937,0.00008820348,0.0022610095,0.00007552276,0.000090316265,0.0001699972,0.00012633504,0.0019338629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002416707,0.00006175484,0.99302727,0.000021075466,0.000017077007,0.00006949843,0.0061049587,0.00015328088,0.00005093184,0.000088813234,0.000396995,0.00000580062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19939432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35697675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19939432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024451877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016245099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39646745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116142675","doi":"10.1017/s0047279415000276","title":"Young Adult Social Networks and Labour Market Attachment: Interpersonal Dynamics that Shape Perspectives on Job Attainment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Social capital; Social mobility; Educational attainment; Interpersonal communication; Sociology; Perception; Social network (sociolinguistics); Interpersonal ties; Social psychology; Psychology; Demographic economics; Political science; Economic growth; Economics; Social media","score_opus":0.021694857923887662,"score_gpt":0.32359927392344806,"score_spread":0.3019044159995604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116142675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99717534,0.00014727247,0.00008102996,0.00025947444,0.00000743417,0.0000120657905,0.000026818545,9.415932e-7,0.0022896063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99939215,0.00011343726,0.000030965504,0.00003901958,0.000002072066,0.000011053038,0.000007231015,7.084783e-7,0.00040339443],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989291,0.00057796785,0.000034510274,0.00006374174,0.00011136208,0.00028329706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979056,0.0008689094,0.00035659052,0.00004061185,0.00019594617,0.0006323241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022078834,0.00019516844,0.00022350627,0.0007538038,0.0045509175,0.002470534,0.00036330425,0.00036564525,0.0026362361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003356213,0.00014880528,0.00015535197,0.000589543,0.002725107,0.0013028218,0.0027544731,0.0006743936,0.00010991869],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026506781,0.000038015478,0.101314045,0.00007022878,0.0000071577906,0.00041302503,0.89117587,0.00003195432,0.00044934332,0.0010069925,0.00027281238,0.00519393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017191301,0.000024828143,0.07255992,0.00006692114,0.000004435956,0.00005020222,0.9252891,0.000037672984,0.000064557455,0.00011815038,0.0017767546,0.000005725916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14173241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2692418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14173241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035210135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040429765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2818148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116249011","doi":"10.1017/s004727940200689x","title":"The Scarman Report, the Macpherson Report and the Media: How Newspapers Respond to Race-centred Social Policy Interventions","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Race (biology); Psychological intervention; Quarter (Canadian coin); Narrative; Media studies; Sociology; Gender studies; Political science; Criminology; History; Psychology; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.05067935972255597,"score_gpt":0.3855373778890362,"score_spread":0.3348580181664802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116249011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48441076,0.016888814,0.0017400011,0.2229657,0.0025953448,0.0001452594,0.00037073693,0.00009546024,0.27078795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.951883,0.0084984815,0.000584597,0.0154846655,0.0020315647,0.00014254515,0.00009293945,0.000098082775,0.021184104],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860299,0.010335524,0.00026414942,0.00048348974,0.0017684146,0.0011184615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9450875,0.044883747,0.0057987473,0.0010357558,0.0018355045,0.0013587283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013648957,0.00041924109,0.00030082936,0.0032241389,0.0062867557,0.011115957,0.00097545824,0.003669136,0.006642289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047012523,0.00042733763,0.00023395484,0.0030938115,0.00821766,0.005861041,0.0040613892,0.0030278277,0.00076140556],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053904625,0.00025578373,0.03935184,0.0015438825,0.000097225435,0.0023546696,0.5216213,0.00049629563,0.0031475609,0.16124304,0.10289402,0.16645533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006204554,0.00020454821,0.057019114,0.0014194533,0.000078059216,0.00037762398,0.38921902,0.00026116444,0.0026131507,0.015808074,0.5328383,0.000099474295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0100698555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015279082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013648957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004097615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029930053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07218343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119216511","doi":"10.1017/s0047279413000482","title":"On ‘Activation Workers' Perceptions’: A Reply to Dunn (1)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Victoria Park","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Conditionality; Unemployment; Welfare; Perception; Welfare dependency; Social policy; Sample (material); Work (physics); Sociology; Welfare state; Welfare reform; Political science; Psychology; Economics; Economic growth; Law; Politics; Accounting","score_opus":0.026015237526441106,"score_gpt":0.367374832710755,"score_spread":0.3413595951843139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119216511","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026421557,0.0024095804,0.000071038914,0.9900946,0.006892542,0.0000017690026,0.000010577597,0.0000064459828,0.0002491883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0075059645,0.0024688344,0.0001517942,0.9758901,0.012819986,0.000025247333,0.000011820623,0.00003295179,0.0010932835],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9753166,0.01472757,0.0012956881,0.002815729,0.004000843,0.0018435594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90007246,0.08075219,0.0031319645,0.0018700486,0.008456397,0.0057169213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031786032,0.0017343253,0.002366063,0.0015635623,0.009601079,0.0099362265,0.00828789,0.061151326,0.0055305264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08704645,0.0010241449,0.0016911856,0.002869753,0.030007219,0.02352479,0.009640939,0.07767889,0.0023150193],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038308284,0.000020565893,0.00038458715,0.00015499107,0.000016595375,0.00026461846,0.008864067,0.000034973957,0.000057706206,0.010315902,0.97549576,0.0043520397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006576339,0.00008177247,0.0022762185,0.0023909397,0.000039863666,0.0011461898,0.041618697,0.00034637144,0.0003083604,0.033272088,0.9181801,0.00027359894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024166785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024856275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061151326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007994232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010022901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16810268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119632180","doi":"10.1017/s0047279407001195","title":"Welfare Retrenchment as Social Justice: Pension Reform in Mexico","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Retrenchment; Welfare reform; Framing (construction); Pension; Restructuring; Reform Act; Blame; Political science; Public administration; Corporatization; Welfare; Economics; Political economy; Law","score_opus":0.030400850222217408,"score_gpt":0.40392289498905326,"score_spread":0.37352204476683587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119632180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76912105,0.0061022784,0.0012697523,0.09606201,0.00017585317,0.000076700395,0.00005721593,0.000017524786,0.12711753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943573,0.000778462,0.0001695137,0.0013521122,0.00008367898,0.00002235807,0.000009874336,0.0000014346433,0.0032252416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982753,0.0007205136,0.000034432738,0.00012808964,0.00021932718,0.0006224332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822456,0.0007814862,0.0005812979,0.00009561637,0.00019034311,0.00012659057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037566966,0.00015762492,0.00025941632,0.0010880112,0.0052210246,0.004390804,0.0005759737,0.002394626,0.003129412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004612575,0.00010193683,0.00024230444,0.00077189284,0.0064002327,0.0020772913,0.0033113977,0.0021005943,0.00007040497],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018523762,0.0002071301,0.02440261,0.00019608496,0.000029205135,0.00047883976,0.024907254,0.0010648238,0.0006404343,0.9099106,0.004326679,0.03365109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002642094,0.00061815284,0.2403097,0.001572383,0.00019967074,0.0002695505,0.11769795,0.0042662737,0.0036277366,0.17159465,0.4594728,0.0001069416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043200616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047661457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043200616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010066748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061773527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08589834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119720861","doi":"10.1017/s004727940300744x","title":"A Long Financial March: Pension Reform in China","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Decentralization; Pension; China; Dominance (genetics); Context (archaeology); Economics; Private pension; Politics; Liberalization; Economic policy; Finance; Economic system; Political science; Market economy","score_opus":0.0322815302710439,"score_gpt":0.3622836123537908,"score_spread":0.3300020820827469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119720861","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84621763,0.007533962,0.000645181,0.10046004,0.00044789794,0.00013251674,0.00018380415,0.000058740112,0.04432018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853005,0.0014845276,0.00015451564,0.003982498,0.00016548266,0.000023794564,0.00006157942,0.000005030816,0.008822098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982008,0.00036200474,0.00008759479,0.0001273062,0.00029465655,0.0009276861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988256,0.00019502228,0.000295068,0.000072842675,0.00017962474,0.00043181758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036555247,0.00027725036,0.00032941232,0.0015906745,0.0065114372,0.005804808,0.00078691455,0.0029102794,0.0027592042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038605276,0.00023096014,0.00040133734,0.0020687042,0.00394548,0.0026587306,0.0035381753,0.0020831055,0.00013773276],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005247331,0.0002304571,0.08191956,0.0005279574,0.00014149699,0.0033170525,0.035129018,0.0054609207,0.0029419817,0.734212,0.02795506,0.10763985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030029102,0.0003918801,0.46354628,0.00044243084,0.00014272347,0.00034913555,0.023258211,0.008272116,0.0033885653,0.08943563,0.41027796,0.0001947109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12510876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13876382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12510876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0234455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03585873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24876112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121505208","doi":"10.1017/s0047279412000074","title":"Reaching the Hard-to-Reach: Conceptual Puzzles and Challenges for Policy and Practice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Health disparities and outcomes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; CLARITY; Receipt; Rhetoric; Politics; Inequality; Health policy; Public policy; Public health; Social policy; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Public administration; Public economics; Health care; Economics; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.1896784033297746,"score_gpt":0.4528907167464027,"score_spread":0.2632123134166281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121505208","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014170136,0.014604497,0.01818543,0.9234347,0.0010679138,0.00013692427,0.000059330774,0.000040531904,0.028300624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92008924,0.014577792,0.0250647,0.0349445,0.0017254584,0.0009344068,0.000069394104,0.00008533024,0.0025092093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9163143,0.06947506,0.0019947912,0.003595564,0.0051779454,0.0034423508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83627903,0.13937947,0.0052772127,0.0053056283,0.007518812,0.006239901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12354176,0.0014733705,0.002586028,0.008536288,0.01738709,0.04114213,0.009818622,0.024331803,0.0063593173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09675023,0.0013924026,0.0012042663,0.00898624,0.20277523,0.040698502,0.018958,0.02461758,0.0006908729],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006303368,0.000022405808,0.00014830346,0.00015560191,0.0000046332343,0.00006135922,0.022408593,0.00026482408,0.000019278667,0.97126323,0.0026514595,0.0029939027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015174377,0.000014576145,0.00017117673,0.0010339372,0.0000053375798,0.0000408392,0.04680174,0.0007731276,0.000031051055,0.9320913,0.018997662,0.000024071727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016226018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012835743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12354176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036198165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042050622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65335906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126307969","doi":"10.1017/s0047279413000317","title":"Activation Workers’ Perceptions of Their Long-term Unemployed Clients’ Attitudes towards Employment","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Allowance (engineering); Quarter (Canadian coin); Unemployment; Work (physics); Social security; Job security; Paid work; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Political science; Business; Economic growth; Economics; Working hours; Law","score_opus":0.06849458592126631,"score_gpt":0.4333170139021843,"score_spread":0.364822427980918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126307969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99817,0.00007961398,0.000024625797,0.00035904706,0.000010222067,0.000004970595,0.000009960355,0.0000014787008,0.0013399952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99884355,0.00012666386,0.000025048193,0.0001275641,0.0000067159103,0.000009803308,0.0000095880405,0.0000015901805,0.00084940594],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791735,0.0007400909,0.00013549672,0.00008146517,0.0005075498,0.00061799766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941484,0.0015940531,0.0013987197,0.00011749013,0.0005926233,0.0021487253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003967684,0.00022459362,0.0003757872,0.00090911915,0.0032687276,0.0029703644,0.00056330394,0.0011395372,0.006125997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007138428,0.00033000042,0.00041840342,0.00048264084,0.0023945281,0.0008735578,0.0023608226,0.0017847703,0.00065051607],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039453007,0.00069940963,0.5344245,0.00016621736,0.000062188774,0.0012929618,0.4390075,0.00010512792,0.0019792798,0.00063011463,0.0016838814,0.019554343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014592948,0.00035671296,0.24795596,0.00014357043,0.00001987806,0.00050505187,0.74789727,0.00016174758,0.00016333861,0.00016042548,0.0025853994,0.000036025976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012470359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016637845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012470359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001251427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013517354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024795532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132160079","doi":"10.1017/s0047279415000306","title":"Children's Rights and Children's Wellbeing: Equivalent Policy Concepts?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Children's Rights and Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiteit Leiden; University of Central Lancashire; McGill University; UNICEF","keywords":"Framing (construction); Statutory law; Duty; Legislation; Best interests; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03496734631343496,"score_gpt":0.37593647040316275,"score_spread":0.3409691240897278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132160079","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033281773,0.030602474,0.013499273,0.5624407,0.0025585492,0.00007124012,0.00017228351,0.000055764012,0.35731795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9440626,0.014388755,0.0048773577,0.020350447,0.0018117686,0.00023407878,0.00008285681,0.0000426014,0.014149435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96564907,0.023251113,0.0009953193,0.0017492782,0.005040213,0.003315127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9719344,0.018336106,0.0025146676,0.0017470849,0.0032180946,0.002249616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02476161,0.00091157213,0.0012998773,0.0039022593,0.007886651,0.020697538,0.0025576744,0.009200981,0.010167028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026880844,0.00047474972,0.0008536531,0.0036560963,0.086827956,0.01954601,0.013178379,0.01333798,0.0006099985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008043485,0.000011799492,0.00019937068,0.000057008874,0.00000324409,0.000026445708,0.0031338965,0.00008831661,0.000018162353,0.99211395,0.0011814932,0.0031581207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002237903,0.000038533977,0.0022543736,0.001895942,0.000022954982,0.00012783264,0.023599138,0.00029533714,0.00014845216,0.84158415,0.12996058,0.000050324637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03271713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026073063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03271713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024329856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015805917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17652631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139277459","doi":"10.1017/s0047279413000755","title":"Escaping the Curse of Economic Self-interest: An Individual-level Analysis of Public Support for the Welfare State in Japan","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Self-interest; Individualism; Welfare state; Solidarity; Welfare; Positive economics; Curse; Salience (neuroscience); Social psychology; Ideology; Political science; Public economics; Economics; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.12375972054149285,"score_gpt":0.3925974825038471,"score_spread":0.2688377619623542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139277459","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997688,0.000006685326,0.000028467492,0.000017068665,3.9979776e-7,0.0000015434633,0.000016611371,3.6066191e-7,0.00016019464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99982196,0.000008531372,0.000028398013,0.000006983046,0.0000010426795,0.0000026673533,0.000039170092,5.681837e-7,0.00009065655],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993243,0.00026547204,0.000046215835,0.000105513835,0.000089712375,0.00016872885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967847,0.0009354351,0.0010353384,0.00018339863,0.00045656037,0.00060466107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001147899,0.00016595554,0.00040997783,0.0011321531,0.0014829392,0.0014408209,0.00034829412,0.00047189152,0.0014131726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030628052,0.00021223354,0.0004415725,0.0020465748,0.0010069861,0.0006428828,0.0012113773,0.00056847645,0.00013397611],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006133493,0.00011058319,0.9889066,0.000015284138,0.00007041823,0.00011192513,0.008082173,0.00014191282,0.00039662572,0.00014010054,0.00008630332,0.001876758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018341619,0.000027983226,0.99095696,0.000002726354,0.000026327198,0.000011253652,0.008296427,0.0004643095,0.000040832278,0.000050610368,0.000114735914,0.0000059780746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.071552806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11451768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071552806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014228676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008390888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14227265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146845150","doi":"10.1017/s0047279403007219","title":"National Health Insurance and Health-Based Drug Policy: An Examination of Policy Linkages in the USA and Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Retrenchment; Health policy; Welfare; Health care; Public health; Political science; Public administration; Social policy; Public policy; Welfare state; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.05644564968017183,"score_gpt":0.3354934347080462,"score_spread":0.27904778502787436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146845150","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85149306,0.010736476,0.00029207763,0.03702739,0.00006826973,0.0001284227,0.002728389,0.000026049009,0.09749989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895298,0.006138864,0.00023528293,0.0013110331,0.000012850637,0.000026212223,0.0005051611,0.000007893608,0.002232863],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956097,0.00044244266,0.00010909653,0.00017842781,0.0011862499,0.0024741439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99225813,0.0017001941,0.0011103371,0.00013317648,0.0028830483,0.0019151269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019796893,0.00020286738,0.0005448,0.005434183,0.007554144,0.006806081,0.0013602239,0.0013524424,0.0040354896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011185291,0.00033486515,0.00056420104,0.016635714,0.003913859,0.0013923906,0.0029401125,0.0017979848,0.00010689643],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021813285,0.00033244258,0.6749668,0.00033935445,0.0002761995,0.00088332605,0.015096465,0.0040702303,0.00042452305,0.22177097,0.021490615,0.060130876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005553324,0.00004757808,0.8837274,0.00054017885,0.00022252584,0.00012944773,0.039759364,0.0029373122,0.0002589914,0.006563274,0.06566649,0.00009189186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99745613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99830544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15652294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15652294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1879136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9783138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153746251","doi":"10.1017/s0047279414000373","title":"Personalisation and Austerity in the Crosshairs: Government Perspectives on the Remaking of Adult Social Care","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of the United Kingdom","keywords":"Austerity; Localism; Politics; Government (linguistics); Appeal; Personalization; Political science; Social exclusion; Public administration; Public relations; Political economy; Economic growth; Sociology; Business; Economics; Marketing; Law","score_opus":0.05658850690784973,"score_gpt":0.3988525888462673,"score_spread":0.34226408193841756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153746251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8678592,0.0021918903,0.00089361885,0.045028016,0.00015493229,0.000028120174,0.0000151533995,0.00000942625,0.083819576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974057,0.00025145127,0.00006318401,0.0008194663,0.00001637162,0.0000043067234,0.0000017305773,0.0000028375607,0.0014349236],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98394275,0.012325203,0.00026528424,0.00045380302,0.00090914156,0.0021038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98633784,0.0086516645,0.0015382005,0.0005314586,0.001058488,0.0018823597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010325184,0.00026906736,0.00031883892,0.0017846021,0.015171733,0.011972786,0.00082906213,0.0032676372,0.0035366272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010707982,0.00023026728,0.00030661965,0.0017038544,0.04303243,0.0059225033,0.008647304,0.004865496,0.00017744912],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014840607,0.000031424126,0.0038055792,0.000033554552,0.000004153576,0.00029058396,0.9228556,0.00006252969,0.00008527654,0.068745896,0.00079779397,0.0032726836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036766266,0.000020604573,0.0036122946,0.00011993004,0.0000033966774,0.00013945987,0.9675355,0.000070906186,0.00006831668,0.008144112,0.020270854,0.000010907747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033558432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046297267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033558432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012851575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069633634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09324515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2182400478","doi":"10.1017/s0047279415000677","title":"Are you really Financially Excluded if you Choose not to be Included? Insights from Social Exclusion, Resilience and Ecological Systems","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Health disparities and outcomes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Social exclusion; Phenomenon; Resilience (materials science); Ecological systems theory; Context (archaeology); Psychological resilience; Extant taxon; Sociology; Positive economics; Economics; Epistemology; Economic growth; Geography; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07064667317119355,"score_gpt":0.38172855422630153,"score_spread":0.311081881055108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2182400478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7602488,0.004347849,0.009063537,0.08027731,0.00018796891,0.000041546264,0.00011602538,0.00001455589,0.14570233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99803036,0.0006890481,0.0002620057,0.0005251353,0.000016846705,0.000009018898,0.000010778591,0.0000015913699,0.00045503964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963057,0.002547496,0.00007376723,0.00014725282,0.0002911358,0.00063464517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99635243,0.00191403,0.00064489717,0.00012362233,0.0002216962,0.0007432082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046675988,0.00027040052,0.00044880732,0.00269078,0.0065683024,0.005209227,0.0007355465,0.0012576316,0.0035500221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004676493,0.00013037735,0.00038553085,0.0019942904,0.028984623,0.006773346,0.010031521,0.0022823806,0.000116086376],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038188784,0.000118379474,0.029297618,0.00014945399,0.000033941298,0.0009681243,0.13860546,0.0009885133,0.0001586814,0.8066762,0.0029002118,0.02006515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015524669,0.00005982842,0.03338459,0.00095167133,0.00002592816,0.0006510235,0.38940933,0.0014716935,0.0001731462,0.5220708,0.051731385,0.000054982494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012013501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01795979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012013501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004773199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038408886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034632146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267379118","doi":"10.1017/s0047279415000367","title":"Daniel Béland and Klaus Petersen (eds.) (2014), Analysing Social Policy Concepts and Language: Comparative and Transnational Perspectives. Bristol: Policy Press. £70.00, 272 pp., hbk.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Media studies; Economic history; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.049931178697907766,"score_gpt":0.4067289245001836,"score_spread":0.35679774580227586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267379118","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030092438,0.9258846,0.001829655,0.047999326,0.0023451843,0.000015075605,0.0005106565,0.000058834386,0.021055656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0068899794,0.9501872,0.0034193425,0.0027120013,0.0008563427,0.000055246706,0.0006343046,0.00014486715,0.035100643],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970784,0.0009793019,0.00018141951,0.00033312006,0.0011806347,0.00024709853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99467224,0.0034371703,0.00050183217,0.00010110191,0.0007816057,0.00050610345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046872227,0.0020068914,0.0019200881,0.004174409,0.002342535,0.008295932,0.0021237624,0.004760992,0.05140277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009168942,0.001859146,0.0007315996,0.008425916,0.0033699581,0.013441439,0.0028967466,0.005631005,0.025439959],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074905554,0.000023371493,0.00032162876,0.0017506777,0.000021775862,0.00009846938,0.0017433478,0.0002576491,0.00012954547,0.019310247,0.8000499,0.17621855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012578139,0.000010414146,0.0009996556,0.0026882824,0.000020556025,0.0001941316,0.002034537,0.00015543391,0.00015229081,0.02496032,0.96873057,0.00004126609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05086518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.080123425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05140277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074213375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008465769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1719594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2280766219","doi":"10.1017/s0047279415000641","title":"Getting Citizens to Save: Media Influence on Incentive-Based Policies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Business; Order (exchange); Public economics; Investment (military); Deferral; Tax incentive; Economics; Marketing; Finance; Microeconomics; Political science","score_opus":0.02827465056869578,"score_gpt":0.291578697147826,"score_spread":0.26330404657913026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2280766219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86599386,0.0007833183,0.00045602792,0.011221079,0.000099284865,0.00007885414,0.0006752507,0.000027391805,0.1206649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99674135,0.00034446208,0.00013213996,0.0004555098,0.00004345736,0.000013361977,0.00005951036,0.000008833985,0.0022014028],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974075,0.0013264791,0.00007749746,0.00015453892,0.0004551188,0.0005787536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97061294,0.017622529,0.0052040387,0.000972534,0.0033699856,0.0022180506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032102864,0.00014477843,0.00022034842,0.001290375,0.0018920512,0.00502237,0.0003487269,0.00077639765,0.008150164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022891974,0.00016523142,0.00020671773,0.0014670555,0.0015679118,0.0014938263,0.0015176941,0.001325112,0.0005063074],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065526145,0.0010371822,0.7952243,0.00033767064,0.00019073051,0.00043863774,0.04862309,0.0010854965,0.0012818542,0.032215938,0.015941035,0.10296881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006069973,0.00010480204,0.8820869,0.00044707075,0.00018664855,0.000063639294,0.043897606,0.0012485209,0.0007745289,0.00504739,0.06602317,0.00005909615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20124237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2541425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20124237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005086746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004696854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40014207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2476160031","doi":"10.1017/s0047279416000428","title":"Modernising the European Social Paradigm: Social Investments and Social Entrepreneurs","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Social entrepreneurship; Employability; Social policy; Argument (complex analysis); Investment (military); European union; Entrepreneurship; Social order; Economic system; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Market economy; Finance; Economic policy; Law","score_opus":0.05250243062945348,"score_gpt":0.35159851402988057,"score_spread":0.2990960834004271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2476160031","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13900529,0.012535141,0.022891283,0.11329913,0.00066962565,0.000051233317,0.000048249607,0.000036344485,0.71146375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889354,0.0019007222,0.00191568,0.0017918083,0.0001868205,0.000039787155,0.000009407422,0.000007328729,0.0052130995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907363,0.006744749,0.00018742596,0.00058381615,0.0009576868,0.0007899496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99636626,0.0019126378,0.0004643311,0.00041562255,0.00037893443,0.00046229042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0114588,0.00040206857,0.00035872209,0.0017548276,0.0025915683,0.010096075,0.0008690354,0.0037963938,0.0018274193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00639725,0.00013760633,0.00032232064,0.0016192201,0.03141127,0.006234833,0.007000812,0.0027152025,0.00012473874],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028751458,0.0000058499904,0.00013014351,0.0000054831085,0.0000010060863,0.000012479146,0.0005932164,0.00010742703,0.000010939628,0.9961773,0.00030082834,0.002652537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075788694,0.000020355896,0.0010770889,0.00015871394,0.0000029707512,0.000032872886,0.0021058943,0.0005914911,0.000084136525,0.94417006,0.05173998,0.000008819834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022143417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023151492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0114588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006094679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045795147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06060064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596318816","doi":"10.1017/s0047279417000113","title":"Discrimination Against Ethnic Minorities in Activation Programme? Evidence from a Vignette Experiment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Edinburgh; York University","keywords":"Vignette; Norwegian; Plaintiff; Ethnic group; Front line; Psychology; Social psychology; Front (military); Political science; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.17404550273980382,"score_gpt":0.4761051004330228,"score_spread":0.302059597693219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596318816","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99422693,0.00007341561,0.0004275341,0.0002491385,0.00003898482,0.00017514778,0.000038017693,0.0000055968335,0.004765221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99611664,0.00012769633,0.0008829265,0.00064900646,0.0000367745,0.00039439142,0.00008038129,0.0000072137514,0.0017049575],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96740603,0.02816077,0.0007131275,0.0010455649,0.0020979573,0.00057650125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83383375,0.14137053,0.0133098215,0.007271557,0.002098797,0.0021154487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026516428,0.00045984652,0.00071765186,0.00043214468,0.002130344,0.00261565,0.0015793578,0.0022873702,0.011982418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08848289,0.00054285175,0.0004991669,0.00048737723,0.0025337744,0.0020992274,0.0020053582,0.002245264,0.001092484],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.124683954,0.17290592,0.2703765,0.003693494,0.0015927388,0.0025597701,0.22782812,0.0038162041,0.030132422,0.038598754,0.009695453,0.114116706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.020731892,0.112655066,0.6441058,0.0021233738,0.0016682805,0.0018053963,0.1165051,0.013817176,0.019208916,0.018510707,0.047794655,0.0010735934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030888652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003172196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026516428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010139347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005982715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14023393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787192533","doi":"10.1017/s0047279417000915","title":"Impact of Welfare Benefit Sanctioning on Food Insecurity: a Dynamic Cross-Area Study of Food Bank Usage in the UK","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":167,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Economic Research Service; Wellcome Trust; University of Toronto; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Sanctions; Austerity; Welfare; Food insecurity; Distribution (mathematics); Payment; Unemployment; Food stamps; Business; Economics; Food security; Demographic economics; Public economics; Agriculture; Political science; Economic growth; Finance; Geography; Market economy","score_opus":0.14268292584587391,"score_gpt":0.5078151413018837,"score_spread":0.3651322154560097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787192533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975599,0.00034061403,0.000067788555,0.00037356993,0.000012125432,0.000010768293,0.0007606972,0.0000027637939,0.000871833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99912363,0.00018946042,0.00003182342,0.00005592406,0.0000072623507,0.000008511716,0.00026985002,0.000002883886,0.0003106106],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979943,0.000770889,0.0002338315,0.0003146985,0.00026994094,0.00041636225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926318,0.0012543517,0.0037346326,0.0003790112,0.00087983685,0.0011204837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013078755,0.0002036121,0.000359282,0.0017688468,0.00076625624,0.0017416079,0.0006008404,0.000660332,0.0045877798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071679517,0.0002749578,0.0005704856,0.0029564842,0.0009586101,0.0012527079,0.0026135724,0.0010095254,0.00050660624],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000590175,0.00004546471,0.9930843,0.00003017874,0.00008073793,0.00020441967,0.0022375612,0.00010730613,0.00007899057,0.00011248879,0.0008080522,0.0031513756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012689753,0.000022148732,0.9975885,0.000023928194,0.000007932087,0.000050137354,0.0018861601,0.000089502406,0.000009797183,0.000018546596,0.0002962846,0.0000057715806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14772402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16511203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14772402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021567321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001046122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29372835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788076413","doi":"10.1017/s0047279418000028","title":"Moving In and Out of In-work Poverty in the UK: An Analysis of Transitions, Trajectories and Trigger Events","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Cardiff University; Nuffield Foundation; University of Essex","keywords":"Poverty; Work (physics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Phenomenon; Working poor; Culture of poverty; Basic needs; Demographic economics; Development economics; Economics; Economic growth; Geography; Engineering","score_opus":0.05024672741308343,"score_gpt":0.4342494475738092,"score_spread":0.38400272016072573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788076413","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99599177,0.0003814423,0.00016854926,0.0003773523,0.00001023072,0.000052823314,0.0016318549,0.000006567109,0.0013793643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975332,0.00042457844,0.00012089135,0.000048563234,0.000004824534,0.000056056302,0.00096309575,0.0000055081096,0.0008430615],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909437,0.0001775766,0.000112244,0.000079423524,0.0001194576,0.00041705297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99753416,0.00047814552,0.00089219847,0.00008622208,0.00043762763,0.00057162764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007668797,0.00023728548,0.00041869152,0.0028852373,0.0015783191,0.0024880038,0.0004739478,0.00066998135,0.0040919366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003726935,0.00028919752,0.0007621559,0.004896794,0.0007687671,0.001616566,0.0038478714,0.0010687695,0.00060169713],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002676349,0.00015213367,0.9488225,0.00021751654,0.000054168784,0.0008587241,0.029512396,0.0005179024,0.00019198332,0.0009043604,0.001998955,0.016501833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033091262,0.00006857582,0.9628126,0.00014953942,0.000009206107,0.000120270895,0.034888156,0.00025367117,0.000035479763,0.00020675603,0.0014362242,0.000016164033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1296853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15111707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1296853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002897227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025724422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25786084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799691531","doi":"10.1017/s0047279418000235","title":"Social Insurance as Fiscal Policy and State-Building Tool: The Development and Politics of Payroll Contributions in Israel and Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"State (computer science); Politics; Social security; Revenue; Payroll; Economics; Payroll tax; Social insurance; Tax revenue; Public economics; Economic system; Economic policy; Finance; Political science; Market economy","score_opus":0.018785100389126997,"score_gpt":0.35253046767137197,"score_spread":0.33374536728224496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799691531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9186199,0.00069204933,0.00020729072,0.009152692,0.000022015649,0.000038843464,0.00013638439,0.000011279754,0.07111968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952656,0.00016484801,0.00004578646,0.00019870818,0.0000028266022,0.0000038829994,0.000018878165,0.0000028638435,0.0042966367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974648,0.00022821002,0.000023197796,0.00009494592,0.00048173714,0.0017072087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966329,0.0006623836,0.0002083911,0.000076331155,0.00096525537,0.0014546685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016708855,0.00013141369,0.00026615744,0.0014166132,0.011805703,0.006711431,0.0012534967,0.0015238407,0.0044691944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004112821,0.00016747315,0.00017832451,0.0016070168,0.0060689533,0.00084534206,0.0027745652,0.0021423886,0.00010493129],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028407323,0.00021252081,0.1399222,0.000117522395,0.00007541062,0.0010690457,0.042048536,0.0039988835,0.0015670086,0.7489025,0.015474646,0.046327777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016141133,0.00011666552,0.41414434,0.00060890213,0.0001406431,0.0003075835,0.22927177,0.013130159,0.003318973,0.037632555,0.3009122,0.00025480267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9872414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9933676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8648714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13512862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12221052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9804313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806016612","doi":"10.1017/s0047279418000351","title":"The Politics of Minimum Income Protection in OECD Countries","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare state; Social insurance; Politics; Welfare; Economics; Social security; State (computer science); Public economics; Social protection; Work (physics); Social assistance; Social Welfare; Debt; Economic Justice; Political science; Economic growth; Finance; Law; Market economy; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.028044051665225153,"score_gpt":0.3679184502883142,"score_spread":0.33987439862308905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806016612","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90162605,0.0058697173,0.00056629773,0.006606966,0.00005263221,0.000018616733,0.0013970137,0.0000340314,0.08382866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99793446,0.0009228129,0.0001247262,0.0002213503,0.000015876252,0.000008091833,0.0001449241,0.000003798364,0.00062393735],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985385,0.00046981638,0.00007204668,0.00011781151,0.0002551983,0.0005466513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966798,0.00077063276,0.0015516556,0.0001825063,0.0005143118,0.0003011133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022070243,0.00015317865,0.00021685811,0.002367117,0.0009961434,0.0028679646,0.0003161625,0.0005024823,0.001415217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004284982,0.00012149009,0.00025330484,0.0032866471,0.0019966795,0.0008140699,0.0017491549,0.0008171978,0.000097330674],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045954864,0.00009415397,0.45538408,0.00035760753,0.00020445313,0.0019222446,0.008135799,0.009001647,0.0007622244,0.44564652,0.01677128,0.061260503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044800974,0.00007205699,0.8723123,0.00060380297,0.00008078178,0.00043429495,0.0074605695,0.001821325,0.00087103,0.02097501,0.09526307,0.000060935952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04435607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02579736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04435607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005818751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018326114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0881958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806056734","doi":"10.1017/s004727941800034x","title":"The Neoliberal Targeted Social Investment State: The Case of Ethnic Minorities","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"Israel Science Foundation; Canadian Friends of Tel Aviv University","keywords":"Neoliberalism (international relations); Disadvantaged; Social exclusion; Investment (military); State (computer science); Ethnic group; Scholarship; Political economy; Corporate governance; Political science; Economic growth; Sociology; Economics; Development economics; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.038749464396887465,"score_gpt":0.28593707394036333,"score_spread":0.24718760954347585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806056734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9214892,0.00020019508,0.0011714419,0.01501577,0.000030436555,0.00003890074,0.000012549896,0.0000031825023,0.062038418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980178,0.000051098203,0.000115766656,0.00026889305,0.000008928302,0.000010529807,0.0000017798255,0.0000011826313,0.0015240667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976035,0.0013677538,0.000037777532,0.00011866665,0.00012213243,0.0007502342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983652,0.00065588555,0.00023024353,0.00012553786,0.00014100756,0.0004819863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054559438,0.00019236098,0.000318468,0.00056361244,0.0105452,0.004609806,0.0008102846,0.002237968,0.0034426174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030013882,0.00013215585,0.00033881224,0.00058661046,0.009746965,0.0022381565,0.0062962743,0.0024245174,0.00013465401],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104327984,0.00024339336,0.019587457,0.000047485868,0.000024442325,0.004233651,0.12215049,0.0009193277,0.00096957124,0.8393278,0.0014258021,0.010966212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014528277,0.00021020204,0.03197427,0.00052364334,0.000062280866,0.0014634064,0.6168451,0.007478623,0.0029003092,0.2547754,0.08354703,0.00007449325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025579346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034044676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025579346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007676474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003833507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055696905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2961659684","doi":"10.1017/s0047279419000564","title":"Carolyn Hughes Tuohy (2018), Remaking Policy: Scale, Pace, and Political Strategy in Health Care Reform, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, $55.00, pp. 688, pbk.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pace; Politics; Political science; Scale (ratio); Health care; Sociology; Public administration; Media studies; Law; Geography; Cartography","score_opus":0.019576955681655312,"score_gpt":0.2846124552414633,"score_spread":0.265035499559808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2961659684","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00055943313,0.5124117,0.00083007355,0.45744497,0.0070410124,0.000021128375,0.00036190887,0.00007488453,0.02125485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03821942,0.79853344,0.0017957517,0.0366051,0.008086365,0.00008199044,0.00048930326,0.00027330432,0.11591544],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833053,0.00072326366,0.00007898226,0.00013501228,0.0005349309,0.00019717182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942861,0.0035232028,0.00039416575,0.00011876258,0.00072596484,0.00095167215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047039455,0.00072776224,0.0006465628,0.0015921617,0.0030542822,0.006022894,0.0011542514,0.0046422295,0.036914002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011940592,0.0006996862,0.0003213495,0.0034513103,0.0028571112,0.0072439066,0.001815401,0.004841291,0.008824946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000175102,0.0000056798954,0.00029246326,0.0002371154,0.0000044483395,0.0000152424445,0.00089475873,0.000066181696,0.000029460516,0.012376803,0.9482135,0.037846856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016602744,0.000008030171,0.0032316283,0.0012156059,0.000016457947,0.000041827436,0.002375903,0.00014331767,0.000100647405,0.018139077,0.9746825,0.000028333456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19720298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33799782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19720298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011186498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018163972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3921103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3086145565","doi":"10.1017/s0047279420000264","title":"Balancing work and care: the effect of paid adult medical leave policies on employment in Europe","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Workforce; Care work; Work (physics); Paid work; Payment; Population; Population ageing; Psychology; Nursing; Business; Medicine; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Economic growth; Working hours; Economics","score_opus":0.009720426312181745,"score_gpt":0.301065569278882,"score_spread":0.2913451429667003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3086145565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903576,0.0031193441,0.00006006306,0.0014122784,0.000054399443,0.000009898819,0.00010982609,0.0000035203789,0.004873032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99824,0.00066110917,0.000023482184,0.00029658782,0.000021958971,0.000004885757,0.000086773085,0.0000033507629,0.00066176016],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99664587,0.0012696972,0.000181254,0.00028671508,0.0003114986,0.001304841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995852,0.0013188773,0.0011576412,0.00014765956,0.00030457578,0.0012192446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003610664,0.00022703904,0.0006260504,0.0011867604,0.001400525,0.005848355,0.0014409374,0.0018112701,0.004891107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061155516,0.00014640825,0.001089001,0.0018992272,0.0017608108,0.0017030346,0.0043233475,0.0012164454,0.00025919877],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004020423,0.0020837619,0.8828057,0.00037576258,0.0008663087,0.0025209386,0.010324912,0.004709949,0.00043066562,0.018096814,0.0057424223,0.06802229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011922504,0.00029437593,0.9711546,0.0004206711,0.00014703357,0.0001674417,0.01822852,0.0006439144,0.00011117851,0.001005129,0.0076796287,0.00002831762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052412905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04425679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052412905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050165784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029076335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10421562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121752680","doi":"10.1017/s0047279401006365","title":"The Age-Orientation of Social Policy Regimes in OECD Countries","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare state; Social policy; Welfare; Population; Population ageing; Social insurance; Demographic economics; Social Welfare; Economics; Political science; Politics; Economic growth; Sociology; Demography; Market economy","score_opus":0.02695987547279599,"score_gpt":0.38873849204341826,"score_spread":0.36177861657062227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121752680","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9323591,0.0013047839,0.00066588126,0.00048508155,0.000019619307,0.00002491473,0.0005078392,0.0000133051,0.064619415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977449,0.0008354811,0.00028013843,0.00009606552,0.00001301264,0.00002186902,0.00020434843,0.0000040940936,0.000800185],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982698,0.00058731966,0.00018602046,0.00014664253,0.0003558432,0.00045441109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99547195,0.00093973294,0.002239301,0.00024116313,0.0007443232,0.00036359212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002660199,0.00015756722,0.00021585451,0.0037176087,0.0007897557,0.0021168948,0.00015179026,0.00021012136,0.001130626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005858519,0.000101373626,0.00021692883,0.0033380475,0.0015471285,0.0010722781,0.002072616,0.00035207777,0.000114077564],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002216296,0.000061090075,0.80535775,0.00014973657,0.00014492303,0.00032838038,0.01755056,0.0017734122,0.0011402015,0.1152725,0.0017319322,0.056267798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015249102,0.000054873657,0.954185,0.00015901464,0.000031698495,0.0001422496,0.009753652,0.00030891158,0.00035800415,0.009861555,0.025103495,0.000026354794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011033403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01652352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011033403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025210178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011734465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021938384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123458431","doi":"10.1017/s0047279417000381","title":"Beyond Special Privileges: The Discretionary Treatment of Ethnic Minorities in China's Welfare System","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnic group; Livelihood; Allowance (engineering); Welfare; Political science; Incentive; China; Social policy; Social Welfare; Social insurance; Government (linguistics); Welfare reform; Economic growth; Sociology; Development economics; Economics; Law; Market economy; Geography","score_opus":0.02862947488200651,"score_gpt":0.3507437187999374,"score_spread":0.32211424391793086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123458431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946143,0.00010735938,0.0001462342,0.00086010294,0.0000066360776,0.0000133566255,0.000046607554,0.0000019509919,0.0042034783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99952495,0.000021992544,0.00002432067,0.000046295085,0.0000040483606,0.00000475736,0.000015398184,4.1077917e-7,0.00035787805],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788946,0.00071379857,0.0000836005,0.00016213383,0.0003347686,0.00081625395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99762875,0.0004183654,0.00073534256,0.00023765198,0.00029483926,0.0006850793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021972177,0.00013981141,0.00028103477,0.0012233608,0.0029498585,0.002014225,0.0006670239,0.00040890017,0.003253085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003935108,0.0000646182,0.0002589641,0.00150611,0.002635385,0.0012473596,0.0030436679,0.000741543,0.00007306668],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024361821,0.00022986211,0.81612945,0.00009992399,0.00007910951,0.0006443535,0.036839105,0.0010472045,0.0014958219,0.0833999,0.0020121653,0.057779465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002434387,0.00011587215,0.9358376,0.00013797503,0.000052863874,0.000069007285,0.03186501,0.00347797,0.0006211817,0.016516851,0.011249729,0.00003150361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.063231274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10271861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.063231274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004891142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005522085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12572646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125676766","doi":"10.1017/s0047279420000720","title":"Do Assessment Tools Shape Policy Preferences? Analysing Policy Framing Effects on Older Adults’ Conceptualisation of Autonomy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre de Santé et de Services Sociaux Cavendish; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Framing (construction); Long-term care; Public relations; Independence (probability theory); Psychology; Service (business); Political science; Public economics; Social psychology; Business; Economics; Marketing","score_opus":0.05188100296107138,"score_gpt":0.44860259464560276,"score_spread":0.39672159168453136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125676766","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872405,0.0003280329,0.0020812512,0.0009937462,0.000022573071,0.000077994715,0.000065379296,0.0000055919236,0.009184969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989222,0.00007225564,0.0006303984,0.00007792146,0.0000057822185,0.00005717113,0.000024559116,0.0000063412167,0.00020342514],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9102789,0.07492156,0.0026032003,0.002388578,0.0077102105,0.0020975003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6187503,0.3370458,0.024670403,0.0057160887,0.011344508,0.0024728926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.080031134,0.0004094119,0.00064933544,0.0019850829,0.0017840009,0.009071486,0.0012127928,0.0013374889,0.005868403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2770057,0.0004627562,0.0008903344,0.0024654323,0.005921409,0.0062110266,0.005675828,0.0023507401,0.00035592183],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016730439,0.00092520134,0.5572814,0.00062688114,0.0003737296,0.00034302045,0.34387684,0.0015355431,0.00093618274,0.033286143,0.0010450295,0.058096983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018408756,0.0010849556,0.6235938,0.0014013816,0.0004343373,0.00017879663,0.32256013,0.007160612,0.0012643329,0.03143516,0.010503218,0.00019914369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012678426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009537041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.080031134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005724642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030312468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42325014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130237268","doi":"10.1017/s0047279421000052","title":"Edward U. Murphy (2018), The Politics of Compassion: The Challenge to Care for the Stranger, London: Rowman and Littlefield, £30.00, pp. 238, pbk.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Challenges","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Compassion; Politics; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Political science; Media studies; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.09487770568467374,"score_gpt":0.4430468988687507,"score_spread":0.34816919318407696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130237268","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035338747,0.7323449,0.0004251755,0.21699509,0.01920044,0.000027310663,0.00045279274,0.00013316941,0.030067729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008101504,0.71833974,0.0009277287,0.025860908,0.008039132,0.0000868731,0.0004788757,0.00022097993,0.2379443],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918824,0.00022449295,0.00006796218,0.00006968874,0.00034617932,0.000103404476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976815,0.0007633896,0.00031535293,0.00004282691,0.00052240153,0.0006745569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022330328,0.0009777299,0.0008053784,0.0012890053,0.0020778172,0.004351202,0.0011217988,0.003757837,0.071569905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061486284,0.0008028593,0.00035005194,0.0018346013,0.0012636659,0.0064628986,0.002106482,0.0043901205,0.050179273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010418945,0.0000032455844,0.00006312064,0.00022054519,0.0000014440164,0.000017153821,0.00019282376,0.0000112972275,0.000015403137,0.0009273136,0.96423167,0.03430552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006380568,0.000009202881,0.0010007031,0.0016768895,0.0000050698827,0.00013148614,0.0011248284,0.00002732409,0.000048508384,0.0027279905,0.99322826,0.000013384814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022114666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06445438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071569905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022485584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066260365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23942518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154897835","doi":"10.1017/s0047279421000209","title":"Poverty and Sources of Income Support Among Older People With Disabilities and Out of Work: Comparison of Canada and the United Kingdom","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Poverty; Income Support; Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Population; Inequality; Economic growth; Demographic economics; Political science; Economics; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.04585028390247158,"score_gpt":0.3822236244757403,"score_spread":0.33637334057326873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154897835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99131364,0.0014830629,0.000035417022,0.00043870768,0.00001599296,0.000029938341,0.0020449448,0.0000031196257,0.004635206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976174,0.0009280583,0.000045087654,0.00009222976,0.000005043294,0.000012825396,0.0006738291,0.0000033718936,0.00062220637],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874395,0.000091313814,0.00007766342,0.00007750028,0.0003918624,0.0006178186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965702,0.00023139105,0.0006276402,0.000057546065,0.001611793,0.0009014055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064578804,0.00034953022,0.0007662497,0.0038731236,0.0033143014,0.0030056057,0.0008534233,0.00046201437,0.0026044138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034476207,0.00024684894,0.0007739404,0.0091952095,0.0010245758,0.0006855074,0.0023544142,0.0007150157,0.00021149358],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024792657,0.00006668203,0.97520137,0.00023754737,0.0001410239,0.00046796753,0.009178115,0.00020018588,0.0001804981,0.00084894174,0.0018681608,0.011361634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000958685,0.000023550667,0.9790253,0.0002438866,0.000041502833,0.000106512125,0.018595349,0.00012226171,0.000048627993,0.000053071282,0.0017106088,0.000019735806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9927637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99540895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022013243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022013243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025655668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15971804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208848791","doi":"10.1017/s0047279421000805","title":"How do you Shape a Market? Explaining Local State Practices in Adult Social Care","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Health Economics","funders":"Department of Health and Social Care; Economic and Social Research Council; National Institute for Health and Care Research","keywords":"Typology; Workforce; Business; Procurement; General partnership; Public economics; Public relations; Economics; Economic growth; Marketing; Political science; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.07511248848994519,"score_gpt":0.4191188003684097,"score_spread":0.34400631187846453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208848791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.958864,0.00018822063,0.0019015864,0.0056954776,0.000014294271,0.00004928639,0.000053532945,0.000016853839,0.033216864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99893564,0.00004285442,0.0002241795,0.00008698124,0.0000015626908,0.000013838689,0.000009477833,0.000004786807,0.00068068877],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935773,0.0045078276,0.00018555102,0.00036255576,0.000526295,0.0008404846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98475873,0.01089819,0.0017688917,0.0005099244,0.0011423841,0.00092195824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00995763,0.00012892485,0.00022530225,0.0015866214,0.0057647214,0.006567463,0.0013580098,0.0012014947,0.0081662685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017337766,0.00033279712,0.00027356905,0.0019918347,0.013745087,0.0046414738,0.005089954,0.001364106,0.00029675107],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036745725,0.00013350172,0.04971469,0.00012898329,0.000013112742,0.00090378354,0.82196754,0.0007801012,0.00037062206,0.11258034,0.0019376068,0.011432907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009699806,0.000042946824,0.02471743,0.0002624142,0.000008550837,0.000079236735,0.93337095,0.002189837,0.00018608005,0.018257504,0.0208421,0.000033256372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07169768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10405072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07169768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014727624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059598316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14256072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215123419","doi":"10.1017/s0047279421000751","title":"Comparing Government Social Welfare Service Acquisition Regimes: Marketisation and Bases for Competition in Canadian and English Homelessness","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Incentive; Social Welfare; Government (linguistics); Welfare; Quality (philosophy); Business; Service (business); Order (exchange); Public administration; Public economics; Market economy; Economics; Public relations; Political science; Finance; Marketing; Law","score_opus":0.01973334933464044,"score_gpt":0.294963644850478,"score_spread":0.27523029551583755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215123419","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903121,0.00008533172,0.000055187218,0.00052720384,0.0000024153085,0.000023098779,0.000047197016,0.0000022321128,0.008945366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989278,0.00005142769,0.000040185758,0.00004131145,8.333618e-7,0.000006074269,0.000019355088,0.0000017666716,0.00091125426],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965101,0.00053855067,0.000096685864,0.00015762364,0.0007694093,0.0019275707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942332,0.001868504,0.001040893,0.00015099077,0.0015203758,0.001186007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024558592,0.00014021192,0.00031108825,0.0025881873,0.007269045,0.0044508195,0.0012897127,0.0006091508,0.004204635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008227627,0.000256738,0.00019699991,0.0027520405,0.008081887,0.0014357297,0.0031829192,0.0010825488,0.000093688795],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003703607,0.00025349442,0.32800356,0.000200729,0.000026764566,0.0012463891,0.5753894,0.00049613835,0.0023892953,0.05690849,0.0025153107,0.03220016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013498963,0.000039564533,0.38993448,0.00013460123,0.000009518263,0.00007903612,0.5988037,0.00060661684,0.00025531888,0.00094704377,0.00912864,0.000048024085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9754009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9899518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06282946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06282946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040118027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45586175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200117551","doi":"10.1017/s0047279421000763","title":"Basic Income and the Legitimization Crisis of Neoliberalism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Neoliberalism (international relations); Basic income; Mainstream; Grassroots; Political economy; Hegemony; Context (archaeology); Politics; Welfare state; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.019340495894923843,"score_gpt":0.2446428448899196,"score_spread":0.22530234899499577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200117551","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23202223,0.005665183,0.026655173,0.15665403,0.0006918027,0.000038172177,0.000068634734,0.00007235749,0.57813233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944904,0.00039422227,0.0005404699,0.0010676702,0.00014358935,0.000009322821,0.0000073697834,0.000010870292,0.0033360862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964779,0.00180031,0.00007165104,0.00039380556,0.00077300076,0.0004833478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996033,0.002091124,0.0004407067,0.00041141876,0.0006291958,0.00039454582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067559974,0.0002113025,0.00038991988,0.001079216,0.0037345276,0.006726337,0.0008705561,0.002353478,0.0051258053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008127107,0.00015204142,0.00021770483,0.0010175843,0.039276633,0.007602534,0.0075463555,0.0050188587,0.00031559964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053191484,0.0000050846265,0.000096867785,0.0000046986643,6.9848136e-7,0.00001361206,0.00074722385,0.0000696529,0.000021893256,0.99701107,0.00049888715,0.0015248841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012254741,0.000016705624,0.0006757424,0.00008276437,0.000001780445,0.000025653242,0.0015232543,0.0005975478,0.00014354479,0.956098,0.040815104,0.000007686019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022145628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022536833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00857798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00857798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003206343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06223792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200388790","doi":"10.1017/s0047279421000878","title":"Disability and Employment Policy in Canada: National Policy Variation for Working Age Individuals","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Poverty; Demographic economics; Social policy; Political science; Policy analysis; Economic growth; Public administration; Economics","score_opus":0.05628819331530458,"score_gpt":0.3822910563232336,"score_spread":0.326002863007929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200388790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94711715,0.0043645604,0.0005118074,0.014405756,0.00006813245,0.0001256793,0.0031726954,0.000038866896,0.0301953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99415165,0.0017434404,0.00041145252,0.00048502645,0.0000068672502,0.00003098134,0.0006366427,0.00000811417,0.002525782],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951839,0.00058139383,0.0001855436,0.00027068332,0.0016859286,0.0020926255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98981327,0.0013773303,0.00096392917,0.00022384223,0.0051281042,0.0024936292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00369182,0.00017047944,0.00047464657,0.0029799843,0.0079468945,0.0036422058,0.0014737977,0.00053121214,0.0020415618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010618788,0.00018721922,0.00043084184,0.0066988925,0.0019806044,0.0005861058,0.0018339221,0.00095601514,0.00011918485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023843689,0.00018229605,0.8298882,0.0003951046,0.00021807474,0.0002979529,0.023874532,0.00345009,0.00067901256,0.029039042,0.017775573,0.093961544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011507818,0.000035134024,0.94041383,0.0003296563,0.000043391472,0.00004346009,0.031259637,0.0011789846,0.00022067825,0.0007037381,0.025708009,0.000051909417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9984238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99911267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82357246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17642756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28938696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9552273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214864298","doi":"10.1017/s0047279421001045","title":"Who should pay for social care for older people in England? Results from surveys of public attitudes to the funding of adult social care","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Department of Health and Social Care; National Institute for Health and Care Research; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Sample (material); Service (business); State (computer science); Psychology; Business; Public relations; Political science; Marketing; Geography","score_opus":0.1651170310588949,"score_gpt":0.4447415089241017,"score_spread":0.27962447786520683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214864298","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972331,0.00029722822,0.000037986334,0.00077273714,0.000007387487,0.000015467622,0.00023332537,0.0000011377022,0.0014016642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990784,0.0002315857,0.00002635002,0.0002070219,0.000008563839,0.00003168964,0.00014254062,0.0000014086424,0.00027233985],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99023825,0.0059779882,0.0010968292,0.0004655857,0.0013162177,0.000905153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9493822,0.021461673,0.019896742,0.00122872,0.005376833,0.002653882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011911687,0.00017574693,0.00040861982,0.0016320049,0.000677701,0.0019998527,0.00046377032,0.001047641,0.002699444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04128146,0.00036354884,0.00044826642,0.0017879376,0.0012423706,0.0020215155,0.0023895304,0.0010038055,0.00034939314],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002532471,0.00014293389,0.9469555,0.00016028552,0.00006984809,0.00012221599,0.044098053,0.00005730334,0.00012317806,0.00036653664,0.00088692526,0.0067639775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014207015,0.00011842495,0.9689015,0.00015779221,0.000014719772,0.000050917763,0.029423125,0.00010365353,0.0000381195,0.000100291756,0.0010620997,0.000015111265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058243394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054888945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058243394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028523158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012915977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.115808785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221080197","doi":"10.1017/s0047279422000022","title":"Does the family care best? Ideals of care in a familialistic care regime","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Austrian Science Fund","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Face (sociological concept); Child care; Nursing; Psychology; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.01178727787194597,"score_gpt":0.32102688749241143,"score_spread":0.3092396096204655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221080197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97187626,0.00059473165,0.001379399,0.0048214225,0.00006633689,0.00001655924,0.000013853083,0.0000065265504,0.021224882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995092,0.000052717965,0.00012371196,0.00007150176,0.000003702773,0.000002682327,0.0000014812271,8.8182975e-7,0.00023412325],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99499583,0.0037362047,0.000088403955,0.00023087526,0.00033911428,0.0006095441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828374,0.00060654635,0.0003753165,0.00012858446,0.00020010342,0.00040582148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041571716,0.00018623004,0.00025114272,0.000600347,0.0076695387,0.004100223,0.0004708565,0.00079052255,0.0008328997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004237567,0.00015566201,0.00018283149,0.0003471533,0.017907178,0.0020753152,0.0032797721,0.0016131395,0.000070194736],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098068536,0.000091371745,0.032098815,0.000046418976,0.000021823818,0.0012194146,0.8736967,0.0002231575,0.0010040426,0.07643449,0.0016095989,0.013456162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020619013,0.000110237124,0.02832951,0.00021999066,0.000015795114,0.001369968,0.9145756,0.0005455815,0.0002816873,0.026231298,0.028255748,0.000044008622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009469235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009910197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009469235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038694718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030349728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028075159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381336488","doi":"10.1017/s0047279423000314","title":"Competition and childcare quality: Evidence from Quebec","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University; Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Quality (philosophy); Christian ministry; Subsidy; Demographic economics; Political science; Business; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.060543607976657185,"score_gpt":0.3855921848844354,"score_spread":0.3250485769077782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381336488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9403937,0.01910315,0.0004099815,0.0052028946,0.000110905225,0.0000885243,0.013205349,0.000022810824,0.021462683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993457,0.0031165609,0.00012292826,0.0004473029,0.00002040595,0.000022352384,0.0015471037,0.000008569848,0.0012576726],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969072,0.0008888399,0.0001624913,0.00040456833,0.00094394665,0.00069297856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803741,0.004824523,0.0057146433,0.0006865352,0.0059362142,0.0024640122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027730484,0.00044062475,0.00066986674,0.0029430871,0.0029949427,0.002360067,0.001836005,0.0007924058,0.01008345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008766122,0.00028474047,0.0009783906,0.00788621,0.0021258956,0.00066077575,0.0013911262,0.0010917843,0.0003118639],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023807722,0.00015588445,0.96884704,0.00041038252,0.0005170358,0.00021820956,0.0020540312,0.00045291905,0.00009893972,0.0018877378,0.006880943,0.01823871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020170804,0.000039128125,0.9939135,0.00039758996,0.000108633896,0.000032589953,0.0017031938,0.00028354867,0.00004414781,0.00008241559,0.0033533492,0.000021669915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.992156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99468344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03237494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03237494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025132628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23489773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389145832","doi":"10.1017/s0047279423000533","title":"Impact of unconditional cash transfers on household livelihood outcomes in Nigeria","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Canadian Wildlife Federation","funders":"","keywords":"Livelihood; Cash; Food security; Marital status; Malnutrition; Cash transfers; Socioeconomics; Business; Dietary diversity; Multistage sampling; Environmental health; Diversity (politics); Geography; Medicine; Economics; Agriculture; Economic growth; Finance; Population; Political science","score_opus":0.03052004814846746,"score_gpt":0.36095144417225217,"score_spread":0.3304313960237847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389145832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99840087,0.00030376136,0.000032273165,0.00023226664,0.000013733699,0.000011363551,0.00014859848,0.0000018620818,0.00085528754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996511,0.00012578793,0.000020726198,0.000017327746,0.0000027996277,0.0000064034384,0.000046619407,2.627168e-7,0.00012904247],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941325,0.00022235987,0.000033476656,0.000034748453,0.00006353698,0.00023269093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868566,0.00024807535,0.000528671,0.0000406534,0.00013194194,0.00036500863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008248845,0.00017906126,0.00018646545,0.00034781534,0.0005676632,0.00055258395,0.000184397,0.00022954938,0.002164078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028509058,0.00008016648,0.00023467198,0.00033796477,0.00032002814,0.00040831085,0.0010634009,0.00066208065,0.00010208468],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010364918,0.0010961252,0.9586592,0.000121857556,0.000098420845,0.00059399474,0.00084180565,0.00047846496,0.00032504043,0.0005278418,0.0006195769,0.03560113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023124376,0.00097449444,0.9945962,0.0001552791,0.00006680612,0.0001827126,0.0022897075,0.0004209391,0.00021527962,0.00036297602,0.00070242374,0.000010162249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009977143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013899366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009977143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063984026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008582155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019838095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403700094","doi":"10.1017/s004727942400028x","title":"The dynamic effects of becoming disabled on work, wages and wellbeing in the UK from 1991 to 2018","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Retirement, Disability, and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Labour economics; Disabled people; Economics; Demographic economics; Psychology; Sociology; Applied psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.06548489135021704,"score_gpt":0.4206611222913489,"score_spread":0.3551762309411318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403700094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98160845,0.0011284566,0.00012605026,0.0029300672,0.000076750155,0.000020050042,0.010869782,0.000008986237,0.0032314071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99006957,0.00080924295,0.000063176,0.00021260174,0.000052258987,0.000032136348,0.005193986,0.000004764172,0.0035622297],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880624,0.00022736676,0.00013685587,0.00014684787,0.00025046006,0.00043216802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99399984,0.0008072167,0.0029062629,0.00019246413,0.0007868357,0.0013073526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009737567,0.00019826245,0.0003512482,0.0014264244,0.0007032751,0.0016636361,0.0004490099,0.00071009557,0.0065205432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071619037,0.00020190078,0.0005617483,0.0024327522,0.0005740161,0.000833378,0.002574169,0.0013338609,0.0011252252],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016982551,0.000091646485,0.9814735,0.00006134048,0.00007724978,0.00024187927,0.0016787243,0.00059624703,0.00010068096,0.0005211129,0.00520781,0.009780013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041644353,0.000033423985,0.9967699,0.000047813082,0.000009009285,0.00003470808,0.00092896924,0.0001208144,0.000015079314,0.00007278113,0.0019557427,0.0000075485523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29543978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35759768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29543978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023534175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001774311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58744025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}