{"meta":{"query_hash":"6d17b6904320","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Social Policy"},"cohort_total":52,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":52,"exported":52,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/6d17b6904320","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Social+Policy"},"results":[{"id":"W1552002249","doi":"10.1017/s0047279413000573","title":"In the Shadow of the Welfare State: The Role of Payday Lending in Poverty Survival in Australia","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Victoria Park","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Welfare; Shadow (psychology); Workfare; Welfare state; Social policy; Economics; Corporate governance; Mainstream; Development economics; Economic growth; Political science; Market economy; Finance; Politics","score_opus":0.02676762475283097,"score_gpt":0.2608657748437696,"score_spread":0.23409815009093862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552002249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9768318,0.00018185626,0.0000014301165,0.01501806,0.0002136445,0.00013219162,0.000038899383,8.009405e-7,0.0075813117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99883944,0.00012210778,0.000008377373,0.00047498144,0.00030032743,0.0000029472415,2.6793478e-7,0.000009591694,0.00024194212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986244,0.00009628475,0.0008629147,0.000082555416,0.00008867282,0.000245197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988958,0.000051247287,0.0008642353,0.00013065158,0.000035564444,0.000022477841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010212234,0.000095069394,0.00038214144,0.00024621183,0.00006433441,0.000029650942,0.00048042345,0.00008192021,0.00008993914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000077708675,0.000057823592,0.0001633477,0.0005961354,0.00010203192,0.00025364652,0.000045522782,0.0003909214,0.0000070350416],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066836066,0.00038111914,0.39934206,0.000052654836,0.000055643246,0.000008688582,0.073097594,0.00034567885,0.0003750639,0.518131,0.004461277,0.003682376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005777021,0.000029945448,0.9339444,0.000027403496,0.0000023435143,0.0000035180158,0.0017710971,0.000035681172,0.00008467549,0.04552167,0.017923001,0.00007855561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04083461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002070116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53460234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013666591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000067298955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96555257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968521477","doi":"10.1017/s004727941200044x","title":"Ann Oakley (2011), A Critical Woman: Barbara Wootton, Social Science and Public Policy in the Twentieth Century. London: Bloomsbury Academic. £30, pp. 426, hbk.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Media studies; Content (measure theory); Political science; Library science; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06174836366260211,"score_gpt":0.39728705842322676,"score_spread":0.33553869476062465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968521477","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60237765,0.011509744,0.000012946138,0.31536865,0.001114662,0.00039934728,0.000022563092,0.000048234477,0.069146186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96826625,0.0035185495,0.000033307653,0.010333185,0.017643875,0.000007808997,7.6865933e-7,0.000015739668,0.00018049935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99323,0.0027198624,0.00076787843,0.00026152527,0.0015830401,0.0014377041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966993,0.0013832012,0.00061746116,0.00014003043,0.00052948255,0.0006305686],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.016193997,0.00025280492,0.0005021668,0.0004209878,0.0029108415,0.00042912795,0.0012667386,0.00046733476,0.00028738653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014413613,0.00019185887,0.00023754597,0.0017356012,0.0049761264,0.003410999,0.00023329104,0.002001174,0.000043367967],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012239162,0.0003338083,0.0063991337,0.000019684745,0.000037141985,0.00002859853,0.07667721,4.1195747e-8,0.0002009704,0.87168485,0.017307645,0.027188523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071980915,0.0001366439,0.08403869,0.000018819059,0.00004945879,0.00006901579,0.029321903,9.652007e-7,0.000010219766,0.06422576,0.82107484,0.00033387335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011885614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014470591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80745906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005609263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026120318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983549816","doi":"10.1017/s004727940700133x","title":"Spalek Basia (2006), Crime Victims: Theory, Policy and Practice, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. £19.99, pp.200, pbk.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Crime, Deviance, and Social Control","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Law and economics","score_opus":0.019553922979788627,"score_gpt":0.36531210724309576,"score_spread":0.3457581842633071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983549816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039127853,0.007345768,0.0014277583,0.089916445,0.0019385965,0.00086471636,0.0001037761,0.00017726999,0.85909784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95758176,0.0029658233,0.0005321875,0.011619161,0.026353797,0.000002693148,0.0000022668535,0.000054197488,0.0008881235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951934,0.0011152031,0.0009694088,0.0002919301,0.0012308386,0.0011991889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952973,0.0013754407,0.0012524414,0.00017316578,0.0009196971,0.0009819292],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007539377,0.00034557094,0.00072434277,0.0006012871,0.0018405942,0.00034719126,0.0005228866,0.0004614614,0.00014011587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014075252,0.0003381864,0.00043151795,0.0011994105,0.0010811385,0.00032052357,0.00007783158,0.0007399401,0.000041966556],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008292708,0.00008989879,0.0011245161,0.000033771168,0.00026635308,0.00017440986,0.09579304,5.5000845e-7,0.0003882884,0.8367547,0.01344523,0.05109997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002524133,0.00026336464,0.033212204,0.0000633179,0.0002922443,0.00016234686,0.067714505,0.0000014741843,0.000038631024,0.16802765,0.72708523,0.0006148803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010801692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000929854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9184539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000990467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035108565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003363669","doi":"10.1017/s0047279407001043","title":"Assessing the Capacity of Pension Institutions to Build and Sustain Trust: A Multidimensional Conceptual Framework","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Pension; Salient; Foundation (evidence); Conceptual framework; Business; Process (computing); Conceptual model; Empirical research; Empirical evidence; Public relations; The Conceptual Framework; Private pension; Public economics; Accounting; Economics; Political science; Finance; Sociology","score_opus":0.062754094543284,"score_gpt":0.40876203536723993,"score_spread":0.3460079408239559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003363669","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9755977,0.00013699566,0.0016429294,0.020126097,0.0003544114,0.00012296224,0.0000035368828,0.000007980333,0.002007428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99216557,0.000036837817,0.0015691168,0.0016105492,0.004571922,6.005844e-7,2.2743716e-7,0.000006134706,0.00003907518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984742,0.00020476225,0.00038367495,0.00008104418,0.0005420576,0.00031427963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984827,0.0005054953,0.00034764546,0.000047442714,0.00041979025,0.00019692846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020388097,0.00008824573,0.0002305703,0.00012324314,0.0012520168,0.000058713398,0.00015733077,0.0001970369,0.00001890718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019905346,0.000066273766,0.00013334607,0.00060124905,0.0012963424,0.00035700496,0.000060650444,0.0004292184,0.0000012495781],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053027718,0.000072389295,0.0016831241,0.000004523786,0.000032957083,0.000008974399,0.17935552,0.000019868643,0.0007914859,0.8098307,0.0017680933,0.0063793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010061437,0.00027949308,0.34444696,0.00020039524,0.000094620125,0.000028576498,0.47131398,0.000011257239,0.0004033466,0.09100841,0.09081337,0.00039343833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025055343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046256997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7188223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021709737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006155108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96296275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024383087","doi":"10.1017/s0047279413000056","title":"Fairness and the Politics of Resentment","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Blackberry (Canada)","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Resentment; Populism; Austerity; Reactionary; Politics; Political economy; Welfare; Political science; Punitive damages; Framing (construction); Feeling; Sociology; Social psychology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.021949857809580503,"score_gpt":0.34793724005419996,"score_spread":0.32598738224461943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024383087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93101525,0.000115019386,0.000012303995,0.053461693,0.00021960693,0.00016262388,0.0000032032638,0.000004882268,0.015005433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947812,0.00009766856,0.000062627434,0.00068308343,0.0025225915,0.0000020338791,1.2698351e-7,0.000006115311,0.0018445277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998544,0.00026966006,0.00035197724,0.000047780013,0.0005398895,0.00024671783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903846,0.00010996659,0.00043110913,0.000059048678,0.00025277128,0.000108647524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008455914,0.00006348718,0.00021451768,0.00009744664,0.000486766,0.00006589597,0.0002603052,0.00006415151,0.00005809377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042016566,0.000039880833,0.00010780353,0.000187023,0.00081691914,0.00021058002,0.00005125023,0.00013756516,0.0000063189577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024360672,0.00008325461,0.0014587563,0.000013781433,0.00010844496,0.0000023930568,0.08663593,8.427824e-7,0.0003097787,0.89233136,0.015143945,0.0038871549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040346407,0.00012421218,0.14062609,0.000061887906,0.000102592756,0.0000064228175,0.040311687,0.0000067066917,0.00069859665,0.7500597,0.06375106,0.00021640588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017877601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013076268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14227164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015986829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034122955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9886624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028034825","doi":"10.1017/s0047279407241029","title":"Macnicol, J. (2006) <i>Age Discrimination: An Historical and Contemporary Analysis</i>, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 308, £17.99, pbk","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Media studies; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.024936288417759987,"score_gpt":0.2988154865513938,"score_spread":0.2738791981336338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028034825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7981004,0.0013407886,0.0048842845,0.013886883,0.0011215424,0.00025454946,0.00012554253,0.000050048908,0.18023592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97934705,0.0002476392,0.00012778859,0.00062374945,0.0036695783,2.6403637e-7,0.000013531888,0.000010517865,0.015959889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998318,0.00023266273,0.0003979334,0.00016064777,0.00059567386,0.00029506208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870205,0.00007492903,0.00042810786,0.00007805555,0.00043630027,0.0002805616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012805997,0.00012649338,0.00032245868,0.00029633482,0.0007764122,0.00011913916,0.00027199782,0.00015238303,0.0000071423947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013473783,0.00013286396,0.00024956404,0.00062695955,0.00020237466,0.0005919477,0.000052188516,0.00026311353,6.0537906e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021390535,0.00028845738,0.0047883303,0.000019670251,0.00050055597,0.00038557817,0.012220567,0.000054316002,0.0007461538,0.65320855,0.3251382,0.0024356814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008744006,0.00020179615,0.14376363,0.000016918144,0.00042361207,0.000013546276,0.012303062,0.00021541494,0.000026132808,0.00015141258,0.841603,0.00040710697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016256144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002270148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65305716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014132397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064251904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9902947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030565705","doi":"10.1017/s0047279411000572","title":"Intimate Relationships as Routes into and out of Homelessness: Insights from a Canadian City","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Perception; Sociology; Psychology; Criminology; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Medicine; Environmental health","score_opus":0.09065526225016392,"score_gpt":0.39496754573388876,"score_spread":0.30431228348372485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030565705","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9790662,0.0003952249,0.000019279734,0.0007630634,0.00036838316,0.0001244508,0.000027085347,0.000009902927,0.0192264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975244,0.00020802741,0.00022645628,0.000121455734,0.0017704138,0.000004507165,0.0000032281255,0.000018880619,0.00012265978],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998251,0.0004458992,0.00071851735,0.000095330426,0.00021221972,0.00027699006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824524,0.00018018726,0.00073183834,0.00008681972,0.00043514432,0.00032077494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040205894,0.00012420584,0.0006210603,0.000291073,0.00086653203,0.000013378617,0.00018094915,0.000326024,0.00014494428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005302903,0.000107265216,0.00009763496,0.00019886946,0.00015453294,0.00027778267,0.000056427914,0.000690805,0.000023442248],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005781873,0.00004673851,0.10574921,0.00006605752,0.000104343315,0.00001390697,0.82516897,1.01714384e-7,0.00008076881,0.06615742,0.00015279652,0.0024018555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066056976,0.00006360063,0.6673652,0.00014375517,0.000059977643,1.9987948e-7,0.18699755,0.0000021052929,0.00008809559,0.14150062,0.0029730478,0.0001453046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66319644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6295849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63817143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026614164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013327277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6664751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035853200","doi":"10.1017/s0047279400235897","title":"Jacques T. Godbout in collaboration with Alan Caille, <i>The World of the Gift</i>, McGill-Queens University Press, London, 1998, viii + 250 pp., £29.95 pbk.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Historical and Architectural Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Media studies; Sociology; Law and economics; Art","score_opus":0.009705560259922861,"score_gpt":0.21065128236205707,"score_spread":0.2009457221021342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035853200","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70654243,0.0011241433,5.6501796e-7,0.041906662,0.0003035931,0.0003465453,0.00022531173,0.000024182476,0.24952658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9707353,0.00048107875,0.000010123746,0.0004987737,0.00156523,7.4618896e-7,9.108114e-7,0.000009373198,0.026698424],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991506,0.00012510477,0.00025140974,0.000068301815,0.00024001727,0.00016460403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945,0.000054548746,0.00026503098,0.000063498905,0.00013028327,0.00003659196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000105239276,0.00010641612,0.00023352834,0.000050281622,0.00078441214,0.00003324493,0.00020810844,0.000025929585,0.000095054886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019398167,0.000055550634,0.00010886058,0.00022376058,0.0004298566,0.0001359397,0.00003201914,0.00023406737,0.0000029618466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015205051,0.0004993522,0.0021439162,0.000101223304,0.00047768693,0.000052554944,0.21080287,0.00040809176,0.00024129264,0.34757155,0.41818973,0.01799122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042577958,0.00008895444,0.0036523868,0.000032728418,0.000033860644,0.0000022796921,0.0019032626,0.000002090583,0.00004375906,0.00043205655,0.99330455,0.000078264755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067415335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023793425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57511485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016833267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000083470004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070660254","doi":"10.1017/s0047279410000516","title":"Changes in Parental Assets and Children's Educational Outcomes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Asset (computer security); Premise; Reading (process); Perspective (graphical); Dimension (graph theory); Psychology; Developmental psychology; Economics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.03150442508899462,"score_gpt":0.40894676501517274,"score_spread":0.37744233992617815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070660254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8359041,0.000025480234,2.886754e-7,0.16163464,0.00057290297,0.000034471053,0.000009260486,0.0000019633799,0.0018168882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910415,0.00004545168,0.00012664337,0.00082594104,0.007216237,0.0000032128012,0.0000032991682,0.0000033352428,0.0007343726],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927294,0.00006325663,0.00019860198,0.000055446097,0.00026966401,0.00014008537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949044,0.00009837107,0.00015224065,0.000019739804,0.00017289585,0.00006629644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047521657,0.000057884074,0.00013077738,0.00016023421,0.00033809184,0.000044937573,0.000098484736,0.000056461533,0.00012926848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065888464,0.000049942595,0.000049135677,0.00013509371,0.00017461838,0.0001486617,0.00001942764,0.00018172746,0.00000430454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056661024,0.00011329578,0.67171836,0.0000018362219,0.000026391286,3.001735e-7,0.017114982,2.3539747e-7,0.00018996066,0.3045158,0.005400787,0.0009123625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012484402,0.000011770744,0.9763171,0.0000032839428,0.000004466594,0.000003995265,0.0021316588,1.3649016e-7,0.00001531071,0.015962489,0.0053711757,0.000053787466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027923856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017650133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30459872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000074550575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000532227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9849189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081947733","doi":"10.1017/s0047279406280541","title":"S. Lace (ed.) 2005, <i>The Glass Consumer: Life in a Surveillance Society</i>, Policy Press, Bristol, 259 pp., £12.99 pbk","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Media studies; Political science; Sociology; Gerontology; Medicine","score_opus":0.018075735157652498,"score_gpt":0.3082048134407643,"score_spread":0.2901290782831118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081947733","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29974306,0.03499844,0.0005238323,0.59136003,0.0028371944,0.002014936,0.00058827025,0.00030453602,0.067629725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9627548,0.01102746,0.00016006942,0.0027416784,0.022134496,0.0000137760535,0.000008260141,0.000037000726,0.0011224695],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99662566,0.00072941295,0.0007754112,0.00021683832,0.0008622145,0.0007904519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981985,0.00020756891,0.00087471504,0.00023213314,0.00025621965,0.00023084469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025844024,0.00021700669,0.00046917106,0.00013970738,0.0010722887,0.0002911926,0.0009837891,0.00030614497,0.00003673714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022220858,0.00019152675,0.0003658088,0.00073308987,0.0008014795,0.00064416067,0.00019728157,0.00074621284,0.000023994142],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116840805,0.0002611372,0.0072933976,0.000038044218,0.00007118117,0.0000122748825,0.01005818,0.000019676936,0.00016957121,0.02708355,0.95206326,0.002812912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012348387,0.00004075548,0.035803333,0.000030950363,0.000022305303,0.000014317827,0.002023207,0.000021669946,0.00002741086,0.012529727,0.9479789,0.0002725532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20858198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036642455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6630117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027354858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9809363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097845821","doi":"10.1017/s0047279411000821","title":"The Discursive Turn in Policy Analysis and the Validation of Policy Stories","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University","keywords":"Narrative; Presentation (obstetrics); Context (archaeology); Narrative inquiry; Identification (biology); Strengths and weaknesses; Field (mathematics); Focus (optics); Key (lock); Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Linguistics; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; History; Medicine","score_opus":0.09848772467763912,"score_gpt":0.5212652790576524,"score_spread":0.4227775543800133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097845821","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87008995,0.00024569765,0.00024191989,0.12560114,0.0001670033,0.000106600004,0.000009632956,0.0000017107992,0.0035363282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995988,0.00024686058,0.000034647906,0.00041171093,0.0028027215,0.0000024185038,5.402288e-7,0.000003776218,0.00050933065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99694127,0.0006524071,0.00084791216,0.00006595989,0.0012658173,0.00022665902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99684197,0.0011713887,0.0012327003,0.00015749744,0.00051557017,0.000080863916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00791592,0.00008527378,0.00034354904,0.0010025357,0.00033546227,0.00015979036,0.00039782486,0.000050890314,0.00003499866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00586326,0.00003834275,0.0002413176,0.0032201142,0.0004083934,0.0006004774,0.000074438976,0.00018464882,0.0000047494045],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045274044,0.00016216906,0.22592613,0.000007594049,0.00059733586,4.653202e-7,0.19832608,0.00055304624,0.00019259931,0.4659164,0.003731828,0.10413362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00111292,0.000047095804,0.9199737,0.000005798927,0.00012852,0.0000047621897,0.01932419,0.00012745569,0.0002661186,0.0498295,0.009107886,0.00007209514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020338667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034895865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6940475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019960813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008664553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7019294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101407006","doi":"10.1017/s004727941500029x","title":"Welfare Capitalism in Crisis: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Labour Market Policy Responses to the Great Recession","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Recession; Economics; Welfare state; Capitalism; Welfare; Politics; Welfare reform; Market economy; Macroeconomics; Political science","score_opus":0.10665310902743415,"score_gpt":0.4878321691311469,"score_spread":0.3811790601037128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101407006","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6545973,0.00023372503,0.0000058834544,0.32655513,0.00018661813,0.00020183061,0.00014059484,0.000010130199,0.018068777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928323,0.00019401936,0.00005510679,0.0014010228,0.003284625,0.0000086986765,9.3730034e-7,0.000008005392,0.0022152902],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951271,0.0026552402,0.0007543342,0.00013389744,0.00090595597,0.0004234838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975275,0.0003890691,0.00080912636,0.000106806096,0.0009227264,0.00024479564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00412223,0.00016876902,0.0008237899,0.0014586338,0.0007403041,0.000058307513,0.0004816029,0.00016173036,0.00003187948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003810203,0.000108848566,0.0003803846,0.0054670367,0.00051089656,0.00034896543,0.0001048555,0.00029434092,0.0000043398327],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046536824,0.00007064458,0.00064676226,0.0000069641246,0.0006092919,0.000004359887,0.87699634,0.000020775202,0.0000067142696,0.0994533,0.021219235,0.0005002237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005320838,0.00014694549,0.0867638,0.000027417407,0.0001847348,8.406005e-7,0.8602282,0.00000181349,0.0000148628915,0.023726989,0.028223874,0.00014848523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.090673134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019216597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.338235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000665427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012848371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109650663","doi":"10.1017/s0047279410000279","title":"Cycling Off and On Welfare in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Welfare; Earnings; Work (physics); Labour economics; Demographic economics; Survey of Income and Program Participation; Welfare reform; Social assistance; Economics; Economic growth; Market economy; Finance","score_opus":0.030509947190575443,"score_gpt":0.4066198591508839,"score_spread":0.37610991196030846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109650663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89825785,0.000034100132,6.6124045e-8,0.08473164,0.00052564166,0.000055849036,0.0000056031713,0.0000025083552,0.016386762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951257,0.00005652776,0.00000743542,0.0018406139,0.0026788826,0.00000158846,2.436872e-7,0.000007643296,0.00028134178],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917436,0.00006911393,0.00033175742,0.000046195695,0.00016050572,0.00021809203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994956,0.00009362372,0.00023431497,0.000032955988,0.00007608736,0.00006741245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002693914,0.00006270962,0.00019882734,0.00010565502,0.00046792097,0.0000031772292,0.00006408266,0.000063309715,0.000058038873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002472776,0.00004952284,0.000028152577,0.000095809366,0.000025332518,0.00004683436,0.00003476731,0.0007411027,0.0000022801207],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001286689,0.00005157542,0.8682865,0.000086140324,0.0000679641,0.000053213276,0.016105942,0.0000021234325,0.0003889764,0.045440685,0.039426662,0.02996158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057753624,0.000028808723,0.89950836,0.00004012069,0.0000057421607,0.0000011388768,0.0044268193,7.405678e-7,0.0000057192633,0.00072782143,0.094622955,0.000054241125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70314074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91009676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20695606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031585983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009684082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3598917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113353196","doi":"10.1017/s0047279402006815","title":"Richard Titmuss and Social Policy","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Social policy; Welfare; Social Welfare; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0508148518527148,"score_gpt":0.36777960708031765,"score_spread":0.31696475522760287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113353196","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22356428,0.00085530785,0.000010066427,0.5163579,0.0008005693,0.00023544488,0.000033280485,0.0000814103,0.2580617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9252936,0.0017271823,0.000039033417,0.0033115253,0.06386227,0.0000026767505,3.388155e-7,0.000022240873,0.0057411147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795526,0.00023573791,0.00045748995,0.00012123532,0.0006291702,0.00060109625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989584,0.00006536353,0.0004870397,0.0000477421,0.00025555116,0.00018589385],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063408073,0.00017183245,0.00044662724,0.0003974298,0.0024297987,0.00011844269,0.00028323205,0.00026253125,0.00007878609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006143031,0.00014613221,0.00029247478,0.0007524624,0.0010284038,0.00035282434,0.00008308593,0.00037608796,0.0000401234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036897243,0.0001731614,0.0004916866,0.000037021804,0.00027926583,0.000022190923,0.3856185,2.9270373e-7,0.00011915231,0.41399205,0.12719445,0.07203532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002330817,0.00024259082,0.047765393,0.00003419873,0.00015690144,0.000037025602,0.05955124,0.000003898827,0.0000369394,0.10560598,0.7835117,0.00072332413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047297333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002552125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70172936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033741375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003603226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114420595","doi":"10.1017/s0047279407001481","title":"Neighbourhood Ethnic Concentration and Discrimination","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnic group; Locale (computer software); Immigration; Neighbourhood (mathematics); Demographic economics; Ethnic discrimination; Ethnically diverse; Chinese americans; Sociology; Geography; Psychology; Demography; Economics","score_opus":0.029279539367179218,"score_gpt":0.3817823398580842,"score_spread":0.352502800490905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114420595","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9494402,0.00034753582,0.0038045791,0.008461408,0.00036049398,0.00011296257,0.0000021649287,0.000014153179,0.037456512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99394,0.00041962694,0.00012113924,0.00032630807,0.004662123,3.742092e-7,0.0000020208347,0.0000045478578,0.0005238617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990177,0.00010545156,0.00031422835,0.000053764423,0.00034042393,0.00016844583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919474,0.000048901114,0.00033549115,0.000023822404,0.00030211682,0.00009492751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012477058,0.000056334375,0.00010767355,0.00008423468,0.00039255983,0.000068544556,0.000070148424,0.00010455707,0.00007106772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004502983,0.00004950893,0.000061215804,0.00021544054,0.000139884,0.00055626855,0.0000050581575,0.00013107815,0.0000035699625],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040394803,0.000056783956,0.0012321273,0.0000083360155,0.000018249806,0.0000018013743,0.20045303,7.411652e-7,0.0028117832,0.6443441,0.0023601449,0.14867252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001195031,0.00030250585,0.811495,0.000048554837,0.0000779626,0.000013910959,0.062429406,0.000033822365,0.0019990283,0.05073685,0.07139164,0.0002762553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012202727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006149035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8102629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002080687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031630322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3431306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116142675","doi":"10.1017/s0047279415000276","title":"Young Adult Social Networks and Labour Market Attachment: Interpersonal Dynamics that Shape Perspectives on Job Attainment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Social capital; Social mobility; Educational attainment; Interpersonal communication; Sociology; Perception; Social network (sociolinguistics); Interpersonal ties; Social psychology; Psychology; Demographic economics; Political science; Economic growth; Economics; Social media","score_opus":0.021694857923887662,"score_gpt":0.32359927392344806,"score_spread":0.3019044159995604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116142675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89952266,0.0007309906,0.00011720171,0.032821663,0.0011307887,0.00022603474,0.000032334556,0.00004387048,0.065374464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805901,0.0006236917,0.00004177116,0.0011393153,0.015999459,0.000004478648,0.0000019222973,0.000027390735,0.0015718754],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973504,0.000476876,0.0003714531,0.0002090747,0.0010025597,0.00058966066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984775,0.00010788913,0.00049742585,0.00005250549,0.00048359347,0.00038106035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013418806,0.00023132461,0.00042570662,0.00016685043,0.0010509803,0.00024272475,0.00032720575,0.0003222251,0.00012265827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030016055,0.00021746487,0.0002829817,0.00039194574,0.000671944,0.00037138915,0.00010103623,0.00063562085,0.000005737615],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00078938296,0.00025734768,0.017407961,0.000013992426,0.00029304138,0.000044799515,0.47979566,0.000010284591,0.000002206486,0.40852404,0.0686479,0.024213387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024077548,0.0005872061,0.16426614,0.00008175985,0.00011117246,0.000026078136,0.8096053,0.0008555862,0.0000010571795,0.012458779,0.009003997,0.0005951798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015221344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010318169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39606526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017351912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004665468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.886796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116249011","doi":"10.1017/s004727940200689x","title":"The Scarman Report, the Macpherson Report and the Media: How Newspapers Respond to Race-centred Social Policy Interventions","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Race (biology); Psychological intervention; Quarter (Canadian coin); Narrative; Media studies; Sociology; Gender studies; Political science; Criminology; History; Psychology; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.05067935972255597,"score_gpt":0.3855373778890362,"score_spread":0.3348580181664802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116249011","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06401056,0.0010766574,0.000009502707,0.8906484,0.0012333296,0.0006028547,0.0000111089075,0.000029080085,0.04237847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94082403,0.0019663342,0.000036086443,0.0032958675,0.032509796,0.000035359266,0.0000010470666,0.000037111513,0.021294393],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957292,0.0015465965,0.00081963086,0.00018504432,0.0010044924,0.0007150401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99712217,0.0006855556,0.0013426506,0.00018448572,0.00043426093,0.00023087405],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051302295,0.00022018219,0.00048527753,0.00018173397,0.008420333,0.00038889126,0.00057801924,0.00019645998,0.000013574954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013626832,0.00010903187,0.00078950543,0.001235456,0.0027860748,0.0002454568,0.00013631459,0.00059931696,0.000004297302],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003291763,0.00007703614,0.00031650084,0.000014721975,0.0006406644,0.00020493972,0.4390504,0.0000011226082,0.00003646319,0.394031,0.15202264,0.013275316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020144887,0.000068442605,0.017621106,0.000045020013,0.00027573438,0.00043587596,0.3577562,4.6000778e-7,0.000019112242,0.06845944,0.55301315,0.0002910061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0078034936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069825873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8873526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044756557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015507272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119216511","doi":"10.1017/s0047279413000482","title":"On ‘Activation Workers' Perceptions’: A Reply to Dunn (1)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Victoria Park","funders":"","keywords":"Receipt; Conditionality; Unemployment; Welfare; Perception; Welfare dependency; Social policy; Sample (material); Work (physics); Sociology; Welfare state; Welfare reform; Political science; Psychology; Economics; Economic growth; Law; Politics; Accounting","score_opus":0.026015237526441106,"score_gpt":0.367374832710755,"score_spread":0.3413595951843139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119216511","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59552914,0.000007673826,0.000040511382,0.30884215,0.00039684566,0.0002618706,0.0000022082374,0.00003224037,0.09488739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9674233,0.00004472067,0.00011636985,0.013359576,0.014339953,0.000011223182,2.761757e-7,0.000012215128,0.004692335],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855304,0.00016149387,0.0003385153,0.00008987107,0.0005142515,0.00034283198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895865,0.000117695796,0.00027956144,0.00006184591,0.00038631243,0.00019593383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000482465,0.00010268613,0.00022537085,0.00029424042,0.0012464965,0.000102866165,0.00020941699,0.00011504829,0.00016141734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014917335,0.000081898295,0.00020084307,0.00068079925,0.00021546173,0.00036351543,0.00003116979,0.000245956,0.00026003554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008993059,0.00018527603,0.0012091018,0.000008564028,0.0001383997,0.0000022217348,0.24414153,0.000014829139,0.00041631536,0.15788758,0.5609071,0.034999143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009804339,0.00050595315,0.44117448,0.00012713448,0.000045833604,0.0000036542067,0.17105965,0.0000011534825,0.00008174478,0.24037917,0.14516677,0.00047401967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016587954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012229565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4399654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041761505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003893317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9899607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119632180","doi":"10.1017/s0047279407001195","title":"Welfare Retrenchment as Social Justice: Pension Reform in Mexico","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Retrenchment; Welfare reform; Framing (construction); Pension; Restructuring; Reform Act; Blame; Political science; Public administration; Corporatization; Welfare; Economics; Political economy; Law","score_opus":0.030400850222217408,"score_gpt":0.40392289498905326,"score_spread":0.37352204476683587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119632180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33579108,0.00015730734,0.0000066403204,0.17520818,0.0013801586,0.00020461717,0.0000069571474,0.000036780453,0.48720828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975851,0.00036465167,0.0000468554,0.0017013617,0.0205523,0.0000015585648,0.0000010489154,0.00001665796,0.0014645845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970867,0.00017494538,0.00079791166,0.00013902434,0.0010146712,0.0007867511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986488,0.00006824407,0.0006714973,0.00005904855,0.00034698544,0.00020539893],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026959018,0.00018254395,0.00047102198,0.0005052458,0.002331538,0.000059839513,0.000340931,0.0003716575,0.0000574131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076168624,0.00015073514,0.0003257974,0.0011129006,0.00055138057,0.00035180128,0.00008864144,0.00059255405,0.000022590733],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029676923,0.0002769358,0.0010326031,0.000043000506,0.00011133683,0.0001337527,0.21434999,9.398228e-7,0.00011137926,0.74083376,0.009976552,0.032832973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025086075,0.00034222758,0.30085614,0.00008256732,0.00017417317,0.00002441938,0.39834028,6.680953e-7,0.0002226899,0.087023355,0.20981576,0.00060913706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010653239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044012377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65381044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021490296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068601634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119720861","doi":"10.1017/s004727940300744x","title":"A Long Financial March: Pension Reform in China","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Decentralization; Pension; China; Dominance (genetics); Context (archaeology); Economics; Private pension; Politics; Liberalization; Economic policy; Finance; Economic system; Political science; Market economy","score_opus":0.0322815302710439,"score_gpt":0.3622836123537908,"score_spread":0.3300020820827469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119720861","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83912206,0.00013844697,0.000013738434,0.096980155,0.0005803954,0.00016053197,0.000004784396,0.000020991663,0.06297889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852368,0.00061677105,0.00006396064,0.0007264059,0.012897986,0.0000021048777,4.043945e-7,0.000011754788,0.00044377407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821395,0.00012176628,0.0004864712,0.000095098025,0.0005684144,0.0005143291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992703,0.00002383992,0.00037032145,0.000051526244,0.00014538335,0.00013859953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010206752,0.00012550033,0.00036056602,0.00036789358,0.00091986527,0.000043048127,0.00027502098,0.00021551561,0.0000117987565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00088772585,0.000100695084,0.00025213754,0.0008712371,0.00047316443,0.00036754692,0.00006538326,0.0004625667,0.0000130417675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027649043,0.00041072,0.0025115097,0.00003960539,0.00006669298,0.00021082256,0.29795188,0.000024193561,0.000117455005,0.6684624,0.0018900479,0.028038155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019595062,0.00016628622,0.71093696,0.00010031675,0.0000206847,0.000016389866,0.014367295,2.051214e-7,0.000047766167,0.265267,0.006871634,0.0002459444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03519954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012434544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70842546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016018162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017164636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97122514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121505208","doi":"10.1017/s0047279412000074","title":"Reaching the Hard-to-Reach: Conceptual Puzzles and Challenges for Policy and Practice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Health disparities and outcomes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; St. Michael's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Disadvantaged; CLARITY; Receipt; Rhetoric; Politics; Inequality; Health policy; Public policy; Public health; Social policy; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Public administration; Public economics; Health care; Economics; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.1896784033297746,"score_gpt":0.4528907167464027,"score_spread":0.2632123134166281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121505208","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0884862,0.007105616,0.00003265129,0.8903867,0.00032375107,0.00025090578,0.00001257157,0.000011042196,0.013390539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9518588,0.0073185256,0.000716069,0.01753251,0.022078406,0.000006669901,2.1450111e-7,0.000014104193,0.0004746525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846274,0.00041770452,0.00027101568,0.000067800494,0.00028626516,0.0004944977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99754095,0.0016113141,0.00028873244,0.000046359237,0.00015317959,0.00035944764],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035288648,0.000086942106,0.00022478227,0.00010589886,0.0011263706,0.000106607455,0.00014394184,0.000096860276,0.0000035622563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009508849,0.00006178983,0.000073263815,0.00012254054,0.00038883736,0.0005883011,0.000046224533,0.00019314341,0.0000014805048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004634795,0.000026436097,0.00047196267,0.00003264995,0.000032142147,4.2457398e-7,0.21734011,1.0334896e-7,0.0000073952388,0.73879236,0.0030291777,0.04022087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027251395,0.000045874276,0.051886253,0.000018454914,0.00003105469,0.000017917511,0.11565427,2.3390578e-7,0.0000018318623,0.0032680836,0.82873076,0.00007275342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007222039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049100193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87285423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018193231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005833502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99938893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126307969","doi":"10.1017/s0047279413000317","title":"Activation Workers’ Perceptions of Their Long-term Unemployed Clients’ Attitudes towards Employment","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Allowance (engineering); Quarter (Canadian coin); Unemployment; Work (physics); Social security; Job security; Paid work; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Political science; Business; Economic growth; Economics; Working hours; Law","score_opus":0.06849458592126631,"score_gpt":0.4333170139021843,"score_spread":0.364822427980918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126307969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9793096,0.000039776296,0.00012134882,0.017115949,0.00036069972,0.00042004016,0.000011599905,0.00002464975,0.0025963006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99452376,0.00014397697,0.000060089264,0.0006740235,0.0028931329,0.000034071516,0.0000056680906,0.000026468952,0.0016387914],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979358,0.00026886273,0.000903879,0.00010842568,0.00039052955,0.0003925083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980226,0.000118411546,0.00092988677,0.00011688678,0.0006943366,0.00011783845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037953458,0.00017396205,0.0004567756,0.00027498452,0.0007526781,0.000015071134,0.00022185186,0.00016757274,0.0007292472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001365824,0.0001281654,0.00026763947,0.00030602215,0.00014386079,0.00033051326,0.0001282288,0.00046947628,0.000063466534],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005798428,0.00024454668,0.9450578,0.00009488423,0.00027361975,6.4061646e-7,0.020167338,0.0000013127576,0.0019382229,0.0011697466,0.020198358,0.010795523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083178317,0.00015604334,0.99173135,0.00024020321,0.000038413546,7.7069615e-7,0.004868576,2.5565745e-7,0.00008331884,0.0010213888,0.0009204457,0.000107461914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017489787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009384506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046673518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047842742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039979396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79847455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132160079","doi":"10.1017/s0047279415000306","title":"Children's Rights and Children's Wellbeing: Equivalent Policy Concepts?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Children's Rights and Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiteit Leiden; University of Central Lancashire; McGill University; UNICEF","keywords":"Framing (construction); Statutory law; Duty; Legislation; Best interests; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03496734631343496,"score_gpt":0.37593647040316275,"score_spread":0.3409691240897278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132160079","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96685606,0.00022526702,0.00003687515,0.019238075,0.00031691536,0.00021192564,0.000018170056,0.00003241787,0.013064296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97559494,0.00008975748,0.00010167979,0.0005258539,0.02267664,0.0000015266818,0.0000048836896,0.000016522283,0.0009881989],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976423,0.00034442192,0.0005263454,0.00016803529,0.00080245937,0.0005164488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983184,0.00005487588,0.00058313226,0.00009975105,0.00033836855,0.000605518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001002428,0.0001853181,0.00037312086,0.00036675954,0.0008508404,0.00020345571,0.0003085231,0.00018759715,0.000045525896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040748896,0.0001473336,0.00018513207,0.00053132506,0.00063737726,0.0005282951,0.00006310774,0.00030341258,0.00002164502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017971397,0.00037802072,0.03743633,0.000008403154,0.0003635185,0.000016323382,0.1527997,0.000029398198,0.00006280546,0.75610983,0.039677873,0.012938119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005039956,0.0005912566,0.65641946,0.00008122816,0.00023421926,0.00012387345,0.0022695512,0.000008021104,0.00025051236,0.20075494,0.13343017,0.0007968253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019955792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053687906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61898315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003812668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013048411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9865704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139277459","doi":"10.1017/s0047279413000755","title":"Escaping the Curse of Economic Self-interest: An Individual-level Analysis of Public Support for the Welfare State in Japan","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Self-interest; Individualism; Welfare state; Solidarity; Welfare; Positive economics; Curse; Salience (neuroscience); Social psychology; Ideology; Political science; Public economics; Economics; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.12375972054149285,"score_gpt":0.3925974825038471,"score_spread":0.2688377619623542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139277459","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9532998,0.00006658456,0.000013614034,0.044531107,0.00020165388,0.0003348024,0.00011614548,0.0000075279518,0.0014287559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99764097,0.00027481464,0.000032573163,0.0002710253,0.0016267479,0.0000143092375,0.0000020670993,0.000010820849,0.00012669571],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998071,0.0003162406,0.00078814285,0.00009447173,0.00032075105,0.00040936284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979912,0.00031553145,0.0011562038,0.00011433412,0.0003276299,0.00009510242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024756317,0.00012191966,0.00052620005,0.000507278,0.0007652098,0.00009492731,0.00071526505,0.000106723935,0.00006323174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042188613,0.00007146261,0.0005026512,0.0008465034,0.0006887139,0.0004999084,0.00007812918,0.00021669886,0.0000017116257],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047399753,0.0003472169,0.033314086,0.000047632013,0.006113073,7.043921e-7,0.69669396,0.0001262716,0.000053510867,0.204148,0.0032161558,0.055891976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006286653,0.00015663748,0.8047513,0.000011116059,0.00063580665,7.752452e-7,0.16399238,0.00007133364,0.00002877579,0.02738601,0.0021833666,0.00015386478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026481796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023748811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77143717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021765151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007000396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9940652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146845150","doi":"10.1017/s0047279403007219","title":"National Health Insurance and Health-Based Drug Policy: An Examination of Policy Linkages in the USA and Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Retrenchment; Health policy; Welfare; Health care; Public health; Political science; Public administration; Social policy; Public policy; Welfare state; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.05644564968017183,"score_gpt":0.3354934347080462,"score_spread":0.27904778502787436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146845150","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62631017,0.00051560753,0.00003523814,0.37163112,0.000050283536,0.00016116357,0.00016233821,0.0000021690182,0.0011319239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786393,0.0007374877,0.00014195504,0.019218596,0.0012237938,0.0000031290824,0.0000035985872,0.000009081013,0.000023074612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985052,0.000111602436,0.0008323208,0.00012450373,0.00014704712,0.00027932366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986888,0.000056752957,0.00096678257,0.00007343779,0.00007657688,0.00013764082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022844707,0.00010228499,0.0003745589,0.0007576799,0.00018993233,0.000032989155,0.00015636517,0.000047415462,0.0000016112477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026760335,0.00009883138,0.00003971433,0.00047935272,0.00008393681,0.00019738104,0.000020399175,0.00019964406,4.2725108e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000105498975,0.00012156834,0.01862958,0.00022923727,0.000021228758,0.0000023453135,0.014520284,0.00038310993,9.554958e-7,0.9476847,0.0005815161,0.017814945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085927837,0.00014478684,0.96866834,0.000032903274,5.2643384e-7,0.0000058139512,0.0005139518,0.000023099443,0.000002520863,0.023632074,0.006039679,0.00007700352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95887196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7206663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9500388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013997542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054221367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96186376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153746251","doi":"10.1017/s0047279414000373","title":"Personalisation and Austerity in the Crosshairs: Government Perspectives on the Remaking of Adult Social Care","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of the United Kingdom","keywords":"Austerity; Localism; Politics; Government (linguistics); Appeal; Personalization; Political science; Social exclusion; Public administration; Public relations; Political economy; Economic growth; Sociology; Business; Economics; Marketing; Law","score_opus":0.05658850690784973,"score_gpt":0.3988525888462673,"score_spread":0.34226408193841756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153746251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7702601,0.000041964326,0.0000043780183,0.22086953,0.000046577705,0.0000694429,0.0000041992635,0.0000020747793,0.008701743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995844,0.00007664768,0.000009520084,0.00153396,0.0025087134,0.0000016849806,1.2237011e-7,0.000003359174,0.000021983094],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983881,0.00055266486,0.00023527973,0.0000564989,0.00064177037,0.0001256761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999132,0.00016342434,0.0003443331,0.000033154833,0.00030642928,0.000020696152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014071687,0.0000524868,0.00012135853,0.000040442734,0.0005916068,0.00005309876,0.00014758811,0.000074271054,0.00001176098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008460091,0.000033260887,0.000060834558,0.00020271633,0.00028542578,0.00008805016,0.000012296311,0.00022999097,3.6802598e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018465384,0.000018990131,0.00042860597,0.000010987696,0.000004846307,2.5813608e-7,0.5726457,1.1621089e-7,0.000018376722,0.4208021,0.0001982285,0.0058533433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020627122,0.00007214885,0.06839446,0.00002812652,0.0000040192062,7.554932e-7,0.9199866,0.0000020820876,0.000009332306,0.002096469,0.009162026,0.000037725065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010375301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019753876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4187056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034171523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018321894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4550221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2182400478","doi":"10.1017/s0047279415000677","title":"Are you really Financially Excluded if you Choose not to be Included? Insights from Social Exclusion, Resilience and Ecological Systems","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Health disparities and outcomes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Social exclusion; Phenomenon; Resilience (materials science); Ecological systems theory; Context (archaeology); Psychological resilience; Extant taxon; Sociology; Positive economics; Economics; Epistemology; Economic growth; Geography; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07064667317119355,"score_gpt":0.38172855422630153,"score_spread":0.311081881055108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2182400478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8748529,0.00023213419,0.000021878634,0.11896749,0.0011065067,0.00029455847,0.00005903865,0.00003351772,0.0044319904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97144264,0.00017813468,0.00013972317,0.014606738,0.012644397,0.000007363903,0.0000020643668,0.000019565436,0.0009593737],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960493,0.00068901107,0.00096014666,0.0002757742,0.0013087324,0.0007170757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99684274,0.0002536928,0.0010596485,0.00011146867,0.0007681527,0.00096430676],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017040053,0.00023083849,0.0007897745,0.0002470194,0.0018834787,0.00027875428,0.00060810475,0.00046717288,0.00002521701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047578397,0.000197997,0.00017440671,0.0005768951,0.00039885272,0.00045573898,0.0002975541,0.00048235522,0.00001552596],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012168486,0.0006752333,0.020571632,0.00015832185,0.0001325073,0.00045466458,0.53019965,0.00007058736,0.00017892188,0.2075081,0.22917216,0.009661379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010706229,0.0001444414,0.7494525,0.0000692427,0.00003072875,0.000005558903,0.042552732,0.000005121531,0.0000057878547,0.008970785,0.19741099,0.0002815195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025502045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064741755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7288808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010114365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029409959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99941593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267379118","doi":"10.1017/s0047279415000367","title":"Daniel Béland and Klaus Petersen (eds.) (2014), Analysing Social Policy Concepts and Language: Comparative and Transnational Perspectives. Bristol: Policy Press. £70.00, 272 pp., hbk.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Media studies; Economic history; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.049931178697907766,"score_gpt":0.4067289245001836,"score_spread":0.35679774580227586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267379118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7707078,0.011998675,0.000033864868,0.17700659,0.0002427242,0.0004649146,0.0001935501,0.00006753962,0.039284352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97935957,0.002335189,0.00008927555,0.0006297613,0.01656919,0.0000044069548,0.0000035190726,0.000023732284,0.0009853669],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972635,0.00050506205,0.0005467722,0.0002829348,0.0007929822,0.0006087342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981241,0.00016159582,0.000623701,0.000064555716,0.0005598264,0.00046622424],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009260192,0.00030633807,0.0007942517,0.00043837135,0.0017658193,0.00029092087,0.00021616287,0.00033908978,0.0000065718823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006468279,0.00026940877,0.00020213795,0.00062207866,0.0025682857,0.0006414543,0.00010989681,0.00057949085,0.0000012294134],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016958696,0.000098922625,0.0005318174,0.000029305758,0.0004808811,0.000017034054,0.79472727,0.0000027355734,0.00016922489,0.18476097,0.01458653,0.004425736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0070679546,0.00048037604,0.10323415,0.00004975954,0.00047947277,0.00013257412,0.7665978,0.00003584462,0.000070473776,0.057210475,0.06354484,0.0010962624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024806678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016376363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20865177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005063124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016620898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2280766219","doi":"10.1017/s0047279415000641","title":"Getting Citizens to Save: Media Influence on Incentive-Based Policies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Business; Order (exchange); Public economics; Investment (military); Deferral; Tax incentive; Economics; Marketing; Finance; Microeconomics; Political science","score_opus":0.02827465056869578,"score_gpt":0.291578697147826,"score_spread":0.26330404657913026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2280766219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9859025,0.000018550594,0.000016001379,0.0095141055,0.00027599136,0.00009894173,0.0000044877634,0.000031357966,0.004138083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97176147,0.0000018565291,0.00021060802,0.016726004,0.011174023,0.0000020134603,0.000005027536,0.00002746474,0.00009156681],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979201,0.00003214258,0.0006216953,0.0001541063,0.0008731253,0.00039881363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977525,0.000064894564,0.00082030846,0.00012561471,0.0011643667,0.00007230619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007570264,0.000205263,0.0004027238,0.0011199607,0.0002569237,0.0002844976,0.0003815584,0.00008492381,0.00004810026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027501667,0.00018483,0.00023108747,0.0014521756,0.000084905,0.0007458497,0.00012733757,0.0002413598,0.00023857306],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014055375,0.0007270541,0.6212252,0.0002525973,0.00015760926,0.00022523415,0.014889317,0.0040465426,0.008408991,0.17120577,0.16332398,0.014132178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018401608,0.0000954113,0.88533413,0.00027098323,0.00016723658,0.0000023254138,0.0010618679,0.00023007355,0.00037804758,0.0078590745,0.102221176,0.0005395054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016862594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010059467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26410896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002831111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026964766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75371486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2476160031","doi":"10.1017/s0047279416000428","title":"Modernising the European Social Paradigm: Social Investments and Social Entrepreneurs","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Social entrepreneurship; Employability; Social policy; Argument (complex analysis); Investment (military); European union; Entrepreneurship; Social order; Economic system; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Market economy; Finance; Economic policy; Law","score_opus":0.05250243062945348,"score_gpt":0.35159851402988057,"score_spread":0.2990960834004271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2476160031","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45450515,0.00015921475,0.000050756287,0.44013545,0.00082095683,0.0003047221,0.000057145015,0.00007822947,0.103888385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9513164,0.00031987234,0.000012595885,0.002397272,0.04412602,0.0000037005784,6.856098e-7,0.000040172232,0.0017832523],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99596626,0.0014363651,0.0006619544,0.00021793912,0.00091059826,0.00080689526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984779,0.0001904042,0.00091076986,0.00006225493,0.00021000627,0.00014870935],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018322538,0.0002745595,0.0005192058,0.00019216666,0.0073151346,0.0002197527,0.0005403199,0.00023505908,0.000025799845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000363281,0.00016720583,0.000480373,0.00038680146,0.0026649293,0.00049514853,0.00019941494,0.0003955298,0.000022833536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011303853,0.0001439255,0.0013746873,0.000021500608,0.000494782,0.00002891459,0.488852,1.8274964e-7,0.00048418026,0.32893333,0.051731553,0.12782192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0052804095,0.00015978055,0.3200064,0.00007368817,0.0004868556,0.000050918035,0.0715,0.0000010958491,0.000077199606,0.39387986,0.20733485,0.0011489112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008575471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017119263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49681127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003996564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053166086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9939772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596318816","doi":"10.1017/s0047279417000113","title":"Discrimination Against Ethnic Minorities in Activation Programme? Evidence from a Vignette Experiment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Edinburgh; York University","keywords":"Vignette; Norwegian; Plaintiff; Ethnic group; Front line; Psychology; Social psychology; Front (military); Political science; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.17404550273980382,"score_gpt":0.4761051004330228,"score_spread":0.302059597693219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596318816","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95613354,0.00034424826,0.00005916819,0.03282977,0.00029034718,0.00021225253,0.000003389386,0.000009918857,0.010117334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99477875,0.0006256588,0.00013126365,0.0001450035,0.0033065078,0.000013145995,0.000001924665,0.0000076262104,0.0009901117],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791867,0.00031010463,0.00036981484,0.0001178286,0.00096117915,0.00032238776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986348,0.00013116749,0.00059863384,0.0001173908,0.00039510953,0.00012286475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013703179,0.00008770847,0.00019071625,0.00031824835,0.0010977635,0.0005655624,0.0005385686,0.00011698333,0.00006305206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037832162,0.000086548054,0.00012250117,0.00019401511,0.0004328194,0.0017787396,0.00007571443,0.00024463798,0.000006338535],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002360554,0.0007245337,0.040180627,0.000091017,0.00007660358,0.000040286046,0.40575966,0.000006188366,0.013230916,0.04641517,0.0068906136,0.48634833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010671829,0.00010361411,0.89615196,0.00030215408,0.000024078714,4.3629058e-7,0.0715223,0.000016340737,0.002350284,0.024706572,0.0035341473,0.00022095346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04100995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008940446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85597134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075789145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080993073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.965376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787192533","doi":"10.1017/s0047279417000915","title":"Impact of Welfare Benefit Sanctioning on Food Insecurity: a Dynamic Cross-Area Study of Food Bank Usage in the UK","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":167,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Economic Research Service; Wellcome Trust; University of Toronto; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Sanctions; Austerity; Welfare; Food insecurity; Distribution (mathematics); Payment; Unemployment; Food stamps; Business; Economics; Food security; Demographic economics; Public economics; Agriculture; Political science; Economic growth; Finance; Geography; Market economy","score_opus":0.14268292584587391,"score_gpt":0.5078151413018837,"score_spread":0.3651322154560097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787192533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950704,0.000042260115,0.0000035463233,0.0021008214,0.00033469917,0.00056161324,0.00016323208,0.000006767061,0.0017166703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985303,0.000018509789,0.000015447822,0.00029318832,0.0010989337,0.00001095027,0.000003329736,0.000015708962,0.000013606065],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971921,0.00049690186,0.0012531463,0.000120766555,0.0005270803,0.00041000533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974275,0.00023286903,0.0014510943,0.0001983553,0.0005938243,0.00009635901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012194058,0.00015292106,0.00049622473,0.00060116657,0.0012905475,0.000015374424,0.0003424442,0.00023032055,0.00025426742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049552356,0.000112847985,0.00023341631,0.0008341668,0.00015456889,0.00017216496,0.00007720762,0.0010284008,0.000005977325],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011824426,0.001919437,0.5282022,0.00026242904,0.0003622051,0.000005202457,0.43797472,0.00014017033,0.000031280495,0.027695771,0.0008562103,0.0013679676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024948716,0.008288156,0.9605779,0.00017497249,0.00003845616,0.0000032399596,0.023344802,0.000023916116,0.0000019890906,0.0047565596,0.00021169864,0.00008340479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004552778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01647437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43237576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004981277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065065234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9925979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788076413","doi":"10.1017/s0047279418000028","title":"Moving In and Out of In-work Poverty in the UK: An Analysis of Transitions, Trajectories and Trigger Events","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Cardiff University; Nuffield Foundation; University of Essex","keywords":"Poverty; Work (physics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Phenomenon; Working poor; Culture of poverty; Basic needs; Demographic economics; Development economics; Economics; Economic growth; Geography; Engineering","score_opus":0.05024672741308343,"score_gpt":0.4342494475738092,"score_spread":0.38400272016072573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788076413","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921558,0.00011571369,0.0000035966993,0.0072528943,0.000053086602,0.00009650471,0.000013287253,8.918396e-7,0.00030822406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991009,0.00014590444,0.000013218318,0.00034028734,0.00036391555,0.0000022463457,6.5957704e-7,0.0000036003692,0.000029252893],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873275,0.0003609519,0.00055571226,0.000053235806,0.00015189186,0.00014546719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940693,0.00014925454,0.00029157943,0.00004111755,0.000087595916,0.00002349241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090658246,0.000061232684,0.0003809785,0.0004726074,0.00014142404,0.0000024189974,0.000065260225,0.00007236368,0.000016770444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014297634,0.000041393923,0.00006082596,0.00067341037,0.00009591951,0.00010026092,0.000016439759,0.00021823814,9.139375e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012273256,0.00006476517,0.8194393,0.000026347083,0.00008492791,9.93947e-7,0.17889929,8.0743865e-7,0.000058237147,0.0005592559,0.0001652473,0.0005780927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078632834,0.000086930355,0.97332543,0.00009120934,0.000076378405,1.4730725e-7,0.02387382,0.000002598784,0.000004395674,0.0016425545,0.00007591234,0.000034275723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024904355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013164977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15502547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006808958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009850901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7346366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799691531","doi":"10.1017/s0047279418000235","title":"Social Insurance as Fiscal Policy and State-Building Tool: The Development and Politics of Payroll Contributions in Israel and Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"State (computer science); Politics; Social security; Revenue; Payroll; Economics; Payroll tax; Social insurance; Tax revenue; Public economics; Economic system; Economic policy; Finance; Political science; Market economy","score_opus":0.018785100389126997,"score_gpt":0.35253046767137197,"score_spread":0.33374536728224496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799691531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94649065,0.00016490262,0.0000021999713,0.049248796,0.00009013166,0.000108379005,0.00006121135,0.0000039296697,0.0038298052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99354863,0.00033746086,0.00003026248,0.0010069862,0.0048273755,0.0000022205688,2.661934e-7,0.0000074322575,0.0002393751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984122,0.0001824353,0.00048595463,0.00009251171,0.00039003167,0.00043685405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990033,0.0002175096,0.0003602285,0.00003101974,0.0002706111,0.000117368465],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080289325,0.00012182368,0.00034900123,0.00014628982,0.0020049731,0.000055950008,0.00013325183,0.000109708846,9.4733804e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013420132,0.00008910366,0.00004514914,0.00036887763,0.0015703152,0.0001549427,0.000097321325,0.00022035725,1.6926418e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000961981,0.00006672811,0.059370197,0.000046041816,0.0002235356,0.0000078238145,0.24286768,5.1728955e-7,0.00013292715,0.682427,0.002550175,0.012211201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014087202,0.00010005433,0.84843886,0.000048614635,0.000029927165,0.000010814807,0.045655638,0.0000012648745,0.0002881493,0.07688062,0.026890488,0.00024685307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7271961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5586648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78906864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048263467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031478824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806016612","doi":"10.1017/s0047279418000351","title":"The Politics of Minimum Income Protection in OECD Countries","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare state; Social insurance; Politics; Welfare; Economics; Social security; State (computer science); Public economics; Social protection; Work (physics); Social assistance; Social Welfare; Debt; Economic Justice; Political science; Economic growth; Finance; Law; Market economy; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.028044051665225153,"score_gpt":0.3679184502883142,"score_spread":0.33987439862308905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806016612","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8893629,0.0002133337,0.0000084114445,0.074695446,0.00094874884,0.00023623816,0.000008832275,0.0000127025105,0.03451342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825269,0.00040465948,0.000011629151,0.00024715147,0.015669212,0.0000026084563,4.6716252e-8,0.000006808341,0.001130996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998451,0.00021899263,0.00047876048,0.00004935077,0.00045458638,0.00034729068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988018,0.00012796011,0.0005365905,0.00004788434,0.00042595214,0.000059801197],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012430549,0.00007711236,0.00023544788,0.0001730858,0.0016311632,0.00004189667,0.00024696387,0.00013347715,0.000007698951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008568869,0.000051166055,0.00013017334,0.00037999055,0.0020250767,0.00016881993,0.00004058694,0.00020612724,0.000008584218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001508661,0.000088997804,0.004114728,0.000035449666,0.00013273538,0.0000031089132,0.26284772,5.0449097e-7,0.00016314305,0.7219256,0.0034115908,0.007125554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001474434,0.000659816,0.16353287,0.00010108747,0.00005687837,0.000007738143,0.10553812,0.000003454159,0.00092692976,0.528234,0.19915475,0.00030993865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00817705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032614334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19574316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002820456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086029206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806056734","doi":"10.1017/s004727941800034x","title":"The Neoliberal Targeted Social Investment State: The Case of Ethnic Minorities","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"Israel Science Foundation; Canadian Friends of Tel Aviv University","keywords":"Neoliberalism (international relations); Disadvantaged; Social exclusion; Investment (military); State (computer science); Ethnic group; Scholarship; Political economy; Corporate governance; Political science; Economic growth; Sociology; Economics; Development economics; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.038749464396887465,"score_gpt":0.28593707394036333,"score_spread":0.24718760954347585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806056734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97299427,0.0022692445,0.000034792512,0.006873709,0.0007641368,0.00010454223,0.00009549912,0.000007687254,0.01685614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98891866,0.0003913654,0.00007294693,0.00210371,0.0056997784,0.0000032199707,7.889715e-7,0.000023134256,0.0027864224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984774,0.000070235015,0.00090593664,0.00010903168,0.00007354211,0.00036385775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982803,0.00006891635,0.0012868835,0.00012843119,0.00017366541,0.0000618261],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000823217,0.00014061917,0.00040303046,0.00016497247,0.0007383208,0.000075110365,0.00033428107,0.00010447793,0.000047400827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052827385,0.000100985504,0.00029152454,0.00042272182,0.00077033177,0.00018198485,0.000061947554,0.00029531828,0.000027117632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018233903,0.00015094422,0.00024398774,0.000034789435,0.00035667478,0.00013446041,0.13495438,0.0000050108606,0.00011113012,0.76329243,0.08151698,0.019016856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026055707,0.0006644844,0.055312812,0.00002676603,0.00005957875,0.00056093076,0.0056453734,0.000097384975,0.00067126134,0.36435425,0.5694577,0.0005438635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044414867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000476186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48794076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016552313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018530042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6714229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2961659684","doi":"10.1017/s0047279419000564","title":"Carolyn Hughes Tuohy (2018), Remaking Policy: Scale, Pace, and Political Strategy in Health Care Reform, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, $55.00, pp. 688, pbk.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pace; Politics; Political science; Scale (ratio); Health care; Sociology; Public administration; Media studies; Law; Geography; Cartography","score_opus":0.019576955681655312,"score_gpt":0.2846124552414633,"score_spread":0.265035499559808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2961659684","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40486142,0.021177532,0.0000013023728,0.011556413,0.0005539172,0.0003015749,0.0000965579,0.00002206445,0.5614292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908468,0.0015379919,0.00002675943,0.00058825896,0.0029371227,1.7015039e-7,0.000001980877,0.000011736016,0.0040491424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855304,0.00008001239,0.00041166623,0.00013595149,0.0003698252,0.00044952644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999045,0.000020680249,0.0003922629,0.00010268934,0.00018415737,0.00025517071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035849382,0.0001353345,0.00047494672,0.000053016614,0.00028241312,0.000031859996,0.00020398197,0.0000834303,0.00030413904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029181072,0.0001175246,0.00010818293,0.000032058233,0.00051699084,0.00073813216,0.000045551245,0.00019270403,0.0000039349525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030104714,0.00017593136,0.0010083045,0.0005843189,0.00007219068,0.000025052823,0.45544076,0.0000039863394,0.0003181076,0.49256426,0.03980859,0.009697465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013732121,0.00069514255,0.015008275,0.00024124116,0.000023788847,0.000018284423,0.23963298,0.000004516776,0.0000129665295,0.0005573122,0.74224275,0.00018955088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49178332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1843192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7024341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023806228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011611552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83056486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3086145565","doi":"10.1017/s0047279420000264","title":"Balancing work and care: the effect of paid adult medical leave policies on employment in Europe","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Workforce; Care work; Work (physics); Paid work; Payment; Population; Population ageing; Psychology; Nursing; Business; Medicine; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Economic growth; Working hours; Economics","score_opus":0.009720426312181745,"score_gpt":0.301065569278882,"score_spread":0.2913451429667003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3086145565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9362735,0.00012015676,0.000008944793,0.060232375,0.00013927452,0.000062622064,0.0000025686165,0.0000030388703,0.0031575265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99475956,0.000113790906,0.0000048200022,0.0023859555,0.0026995046,0.0000010056888,3.2985204e-7,0.0000064028677,0.000028640308],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986132,0.00033762114,0.0002597636,0.000057470097,0.000583203,0.00014874712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936485,0.00017659289,0.00017043277,0.000025262556,0.00016989563,0.00009299157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061218423,0.00006636544,0.00018369078,0.000058468933,0.00019262226,0.00003541221,0.00017671584,0.000060861425,0.000008658074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016651885,0.000044112432,0.00007532345,0.0003751523,0.00015469498,0.00004698083,0.000039146373,0.00023499373,9.288928e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043122564,0.000050544408,0.15057127,0.00008306099,0.00013418324,0.00005581348,0.49964678,0.00028706802,0.00050324376,0.30693778,0.009876788,0.03142224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0063356846,0.00567553,0.80005276,0.0014180467,0.000187391,0.000017369643,0.121141195,0.00041040243,0.0014634872,0.0018316,0.06047087,0.0009956497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016516099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007163505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6494815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011207932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003082812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24967512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121752680","doi":"10.1017/s0047279401006365","title":"The Age-Orientation of Social Policy Regimes in OECD Countries","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare state; Social policy; Welfare; Population; Population ageing; Social insurance; Demographic economics; Social Welfare; Economics; Political science; Politics; Economic growth; Sociology; Demography; Market economy","score_opus":0.02695987547279599,"score_gpt":0.38873849204341826,"score_spread":0.36177861657062227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121752680","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6423064,0.0003095866,0.0000065544623,0.19877788,0.00071006856,0.00025467644,0.00001503319,0.000025383339,0.15759446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9705243,0.002961862,0.000014071199,0.0007667921,0.022026842,0.000004656879,6.1290984e-7,0.000014953956,0.003685872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973102,0.0003749602,0.0007248669,0.00009550553,0.0009464189,0.0005480071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830526,0.00021068432,0.0008767915,0.000061378414,0.00047090917,0.000074981486],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017612493,0.00014463693,0.00041966542,0.00035755627,0.0021311792,0.00009639862,0.00039956046,0.00020910156,0.000015719734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012670964,0.00010463529,0.00029512908,0.00094128726,0.0016537554,0.000353436,0.000056977937,0.0003143232,0.000009088814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021438295,0.0000962758,0.004723292,0.000017314767,0.00013370317,0.0000151859485,0.29689285,0.000002404373,0.000057663055,0.67036325,0.011764361,0.015719347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016221255,0.00014853534,0.34228685,0.00003464098,0.00006222103,0.000009000792,0.1353768,6.1007495e-7,0.000090084795,0.16920823,0.35086825,0.00029264978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022112997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046574865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50115496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006562234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019759007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123458431","doi":"10.1017/s0047279417000381","title":"Beyond Special Privileges: The Discretionary Treatment of Ethnic Minorities in China's Welfare System","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnic group; Livelihood; Allowance (engineering); Welfare; Political science; Incentive; China; Social policy; Social Welfare; Social insurance; Government (linguistics); Welfare reform; Economic growth; Sociology; Development economics; Economics; Law; Market economy; Geography","score_opus":0.02862947488200651,"score_gpt":0.3507437187999374,"score_spread":0.32211424391793086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123458431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7108571,0.0013051814,0.0000039709157,0.06492243,0.0016233017,0.000289604,0.00006496956,0.000009007822,0.22092444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97823864,0.00086328306,0.000019962084,0.000016870481,0.018539978,0.0000043294854,0.0000012826623,0.000007968006,0.0023076672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985213,0.0002208032,0.00047390605,0.00008081843,0.00045762525,0.00024549963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883074,0.00006639138,0.00076115853,0.00015755593,0.000109740264,0.00007439041],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005494803,0.00011021579,0.00032667362,0.00013903751,0.0019078318,0.000081794395,0.00045212923,0.00014795376,0.00009596177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001744561,0.00007356741,0.00030626982,0.00015874849,0.0007981983,0.00027226814,0.000045459357,0.0001952995,0.0000023662346],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006086496,0.0002032211,0.0058991387,0.000046431192,0.00009967033,0.000026814441,0.21915688,0.000011424055,0.0000102758995,0.7479205,0.001574993,0.024989747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008336591,0.00015599417,0.8645027,0.00008076579,0.000060049533,0.000013337252,0.087393165,0.0000036566885,0.0000057845377,0.009492229,0.037345167,0.00011348597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020245608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072930707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8586036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060775824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005209846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99939156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125676766","doi":"10.1017/s0047279420000720","title":"Do Assessment Tools Shape Policy Preferences? Analysing Policy Framing Effects on Older Adults’ Conceptualisation of Autonomy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre de Santé et de Services Sociaux Cavendish; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Framing (construction); Long-term care; Public relations; Independence (probability theory); Psychology; Service (business); Political science; Public economics; Social psychology; Business; Economics; Marketing","score_opus":0.05188100296107138,"score_gpt":0.44860259464560276,"score_spread":0.39672159168453136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125676766","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.968072,0.00022303277,0.00021619885,0.018792588,0.0007146779,0.00033248687,0.000032924763,0.00002524663,0.011590856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841569,0.0000819911,0.00054917054,0.001799333,0.013037554,0.000010412364,0.000019691895,0.000028551654,0.00031637438],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964982,0.00095305673,0.001162292,0.00021304152,0.00064205204,0.0005313469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99607134,0.0007967343,0.0017170063,0.00019512519,0.001022782,0.0001970365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071031775,0.00022279011,0.00077438244,0.0008792764,0.00057936326,0.00006100362,0.00022257339,0.0003221757,0.00021120165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017999996,0.0002001554,0.00038788313,0.0014119678,0.00008873152,0.00030881155,0.000082560146,0.0008383301,0.000011808107],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038513078,0.0006390581,0.0099830385,0.0014524206,0.0007489116,0.00004804973,0.22975394,0.000051124294,0.004228316,0.06492115,0.012285829,0.675503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0064781737,0.0007997676,0.89913684,0.0032713453,0.00039684342,0.000014610033,0.06839707,0.000069096764,0.0019424476,0.011784868,0.00714227,0.00056665094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023316105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003401763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88915384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001875868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010808991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130237268","doi":"10.1017/s0047279421000052","title":"Edward U. Murphy (2018), The Politics of Compassion: The Challenge to Care for the Stranger, London: Rowman and Littlefield, £30.00, pp. 238, pbk.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Healthcare Systems and Challenges","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Compassion; Politics; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Political science; Media studies; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.09487770568467374,"score_gpt":0.4430468988687507,"score_spread":0.34816919318407696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130237268","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054016218,0.054159068,0.00012832008,0.8841012,0.0019705477,0.0012570118,0.00018976959,0.000014729926,0.0041631125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9697175,0.00567903,0.00005020583,0.00607228,0.017624605,0.000052408504,0.0000020241175,0.00003391129,0.00076803134],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99721193,0.00077860523,0.0008937694,0.000144496,0.00044269828,0.0005284736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965678,0.0012628485,0.0006094282,0.00032245982,0.0010218589,0.00021564313],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011786295,0.00017307629,0.0005202168,0.00005516295,0.0021631345,0.000025784364,0.00038966013,0.00029013932,0.00010415848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004183635,0.0000841114,0.00026218404,0.00018773427,0.00014621102,0.00005642937,0.00014162298,0.0010243917,0.000007663946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016925734,0.00016016563,0.0005184212,0.0028249929,0.0004425929,0.000020035655,0.4215778,0.0000068602117,0.00012829965,0.18997514,0.32906678,0.055109654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072180456,0.00022499233,0.010147175,0.0003182872,0.00005918728,0.000015377962,0.2044195,0.0000034092536,0.000024547013,0.0030290454,0.7809392,0.00009742969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014175411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013671827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91570127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016110358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00151638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154897835","doi":"10.1017/s0047279421000209","title":"Poverty and Sources of Income Support Among Older People With Disabilities and Out of Work: Comparison of Canada and the United Kingdom","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Disadvantaged; Poverty; Income Support; Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Population; Inequality; Economic growth; Demographic economics; Political science; Economics; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.04585028390247158,"score_gpt":0.3822236244757403,"score_spread":0.33637334057326873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154897835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.989309,0.00017136338,0.0000019869956,0.009904469,0.000057810223,0.00009923097,0.00001991916,0.0000013967519,0.00043480058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99922454,0.000066425055,0.0000101692785,0.00020948659,0.00018081322,0.0000015369378,0.0000010452845,0.000006771734,0.00029920155],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998817,0.00021675215,0.00052439497,0.00005308361,0.00023304085,0.00015567902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834955,0.00056938216,0.0006802319,0.000050987437,0.00029703058,0.00005284198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034106636,0.00008084274,0.0005365827,0.00006373813,0.00031066954,0.0000044981716,0.00005030163,0.000050018563,0.000020233223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026035614,0.000047112746,0.000034713004,0.00017925775,0.00047170348,0.000053375912,0.000104145925,0.0002138133,1.4301473e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014278194,0.00002294965,0.91084886,0.00022578341,0.00012952098,6.258765e-7,0.08456497,0.0000011183299,0.0000057755815,0.0017339034,0.0022556807,0.00006804225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001413445,0.000064394924,0.93216497,0.00019735935,0.00007306822,0.0000011860147,0.065123305,0.0000015406621,0.000026635618,0.00037120047,0.0005185954,0.00004432432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25662032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35333413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096713826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004681608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052411587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74832994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208848791","doi":"10.1017/s0047279421000805","title":"How do you Shape a Market? Explaining Local State Practices in Adult Social Care","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Health Economics","funders":"Department of Health and Social Care; Economic and Social Research Council; National Institute for Health and Care Research","keywords":"Typology; Workforce; Business; Procurement; General partnership; Public economics; Public relations; Economics; Economic growth; Marketing; Political science; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.07511248848994519,"score_gpt":0.4191188003684097,"score_spread":0.34400631187846453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208848791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5384947,0.0003015871,0.000012862967,0.44235837,0.00051426206,0.00015056247,0.000030355524,0.00002475282,0.018112501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99294317,0.00024628307,0.00004820973,0.0020165988,0.004084123,0.0000116299725,0.0000016480683,0.00001702574,0.0006313002],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968599,0.0010281231,0.0004384144,0.00014178407,0.0010741617,0.00045760497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976964,0.00012867199,0.0013622192,0.00004572948,0.0006421034,0.0001248809],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019720336,0.00011506732,0.00028539525,0.0004087703,0.0015762352,0.00019248473,0.00036172278,0.00011137136,0.00028291292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011630513,0.00012430061,0.00013058266,0.0010082084,0.00020115299,0.00054538215,0.00008665444,0.0008913245,0.0000019107904],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023591409,0.00011189776,0.0012946145,0.000053033,0.00004263204,0.000104609826,0.5862305,0.0000040375976,0.000018570785,0.06293013,0.011291897,0.33768213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000569574,0.000099763005,0.0040328456,0.0000129428445,0.0000061065944,0.000006412551,0.6612606,0.00000915426,0.000002182009,0.0010650636,0.33281606,0.00011930457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016159683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003347639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45444846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012808758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002396872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215123419","doi":"10.1017/s0047279421000751","title":"Comparing Government Social Welfare Service Acquisition Regimes: Marketisation and Bases for Competition in Canadian and English Homelessness","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Incentive; Social Welfare; Government (linguistics); Welfare; Quality (philosophy); Business; Service (business); Order (exchange); Public administration; Public economics; Market economy; Economics; Public relations; Political science; Finance; Marketing; Law","score_opus":0.01973334933464044,"score_gpt":0.294963644850478,"score_spread":0.27523029551583755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215123419","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9793256,0.0000706426,0.000022708437,0.017276175,0.00018747756,0.000097464734,0.000035458674,0.0000056849417,0.002978788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99698246,0.0000554824,0.000062773724,0.00032393882,0.002527109,0.0000036418257,0.000006074406,0.000007836031,0.000030697047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908197,0.00013945214,0.00020616438,0.00008738412,0.00025098244,0.00023403244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938315,0.000055014018,0.0001540435,0.000020452328,0.00026537085,0.000121978956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006260907,0.0000681789,0.00019658756,0.00008776659,0.000631595,0.00012079417,0.00005447478,0.00008771262,0.000022329896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018536115,0.000080433136,0.000040225448,0.00023330966,0.00005548633,0.00029603383,0.000018393563,0.00010918685,1.0116834e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003267911,0.00013998417,0.27696195,0.000578324,0.00011239323,0.000044303146,0.31262046,0.000016554346,0.001165698,0.39248326,0.0010031918,0.014547072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009579235,0.000023936425,0.8855174,0.00007127721,0.00002461218,0.0000040393506,0.08120017,0.000050586314,0.000060229664,0.0010921202,0.030862032,0.00013562903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1326981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5613988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6085555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008095587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042047558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87307733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200117551","doi":"10.1017/s0047279421000763","title":"Basic Income and the Legitimization Crisis of Neoliberalism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Neoliberalism (international relations); Basic income; Mainstream; Grassroots; Political economy; Hegemony; Context (archaeology); Politics; Welfare state; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.019340495894923843,"score_gpt":0.2446428448899196,"score_spread":0.22530234899499577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200117551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8948002,0.0037218514,0.0009748192,0.049309604,0.0004782144,0.000096477466,0.000063332234,0.0000084256535,0.050547104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941352,0.0012677521,0.00037815748,0.0022998727,0.0012977356,0.0000010091378,0.0000010772778,0.0000147118,0.0006044563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990203,0.000046006062,0.0006488144,0.00009195098,0.000051060328,0.00014189535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989053,0.000045404693,0.0008275068,0.00008010348,0.00010542852,0.000036277863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004712649,0.00008176191,0.00044291888,0.00018382104,0.00014502722,0.000051405557,0.000116622956,0.00008126055,0.000060402308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006169378,0.00007215591,0.00018353784,0.00034407448,0.00017880787,0.00019254237,0.00004208449,0.00014927494,0.000005821819],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040228435,0.000036439054,0.0008715997,0.000024980538,0.00007228623,0.0000079717,0.006320631,0.0000497075,0.000014561684,0.98822397,0.0034689575,0.00086866843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011734659,0.00020280597,0.1417235,0.000107027685,0.00010621626,0.00032083914,0.001339437,0.00043444464,0.0007049533,0.588291,0.25444102,0.00059408665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006388814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011824819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39993298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004850989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009896157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29424328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200388790","doi":"10.1017/s0047279421000878","title":"Disability and Employment Policy in Canada: National Policy Variation for Working Age Individuals","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Poverty; Demographic economics; Social policy; Political science; Policy analysis; Economic growth; Public administration; Economics","score_opus":0.05628819331530458,"score_gpt":0.3822910563232336,"score_spread":0.326002863007929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200388790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6576403,0.00024296161,0.000019088702,0.32482505,0.00048812875,0.00039994376,0.00011943316,0.000015130664,0.016249951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97900605,0.00030763235,0.00013617842,0.0022131926,0.01795233,0.000011822011,0.0000033151398,0.0000118168655,0.00035764163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997778,0.0002796537,0.00057669706,0.00014096402,0.000753168,0.00047151488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987367,0.00033403482,0.00042228884,0.000044706085,0.0003075522,0.00015472321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001225627,0.00013013446,0.0003752562,0.00023228653,0.0008623084,0.00009190705,0.00016351757,0.00013207474,0.0000070794654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004096534,0.0001229107,0.0001401883,0.0010500152,0.00033336872,0.00020767083,0.00007692246,0.00021653803,4.2232168e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056841276,0.00026151785,0.076017044,0.00005219091,0.00027791466,0.000015503987,0.116803765,0.000027533286,0.00008336336,0.77543235,0.0039289733,0.02704302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008201776,0.000022362534,0.8018683,0.000027987706,0.000018859342,0.0000034370526,0.010530571,0.0000015739923,0.000015456382,0.1680071,0.018536257,0.00014790866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9021229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9090197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72585124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004634127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016934976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99918693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214864298","doi":"10.1017/s0047279421001045","title":"Who should pay for social care for older people in England? Results from surveys of public attitudes to the funding of adult social care","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Healthcare innovation and challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Department of Health and Social Care; National Institute for Health and Care Research; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Sample (material); Service (business); State (computer science); Psychology; Business; Public relations; Political science; Marketing; Geography","score_opus":0.1651170310588949,"score_gpt":0.4447415089241017,"score_spread":0.27962447786520683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214864298","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7556312,0.0001528784,0.00012356286,0.23989277,0.0006236212,0.0007103412,0.0022549643,0.000011839185,0.0005987973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924464,0.000039641054,0.000067910245,0.000685034,0.0065589696,0.000050384562,0.000050466457,0.000020864396,0.000080283644],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99657047,0.001074879,0.00091283553,0.00016454111,0.0008274091,0.0004498524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964199,0.0005832223,0.0008900656,0.000068927926,0.0019475236,0.00009037974],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035432528,0.00012608929,0.00051572605,0.0003151643,0.0016760888,0.000054245273,0.000515894,0.00018420297,0.000029672772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001899154,0.00010336707,0.00030232992,0.0009536291,0.00010899653,0.00014990586,0.000088563276,0.0003898307,2.4489435e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021348003,0.000099053126,0.005596778,0.0001338618,0.00006707485,5.801579e-7,0.88976294,0.0000057521424,0.000038537393,0.03175127,0.004712404,0.06761826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030869718,0.00025429696,0.2267683,0.000034492467,0.000024993025,2.7098667e-7,0.6281237,0.0000023516798,0.000042774234,0.0011265182,0.14035508,0.00018025354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011101537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12992883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26163927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000782649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020068309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4221080197","doi":"10.1017/s0047279422000022","title":"Does the family care best? Ideals of care in a familialistic care regime","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Austrian Science Fund","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Face (sociological concept); Child care; Nursing; Psychology; Medicine; Sociology","score_opus":0.01178727787194597,"score_gpt":0.32102688749241143,"score_spread":0.3092396096204655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4221080197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9690098,0.003090218,0.000008674979,0.0050519146,0.0014612221,0.00022007807,0.00020878146,0.000007046196,0.020942256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961842,0.00019476574,0.00002676928,0.0006165435,0.0025707937,0.000010804404,0.0000076177153,0.000014369766,0.00037417354],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976669,0.00057843816,0.00048856024,0.00013152376,0.0008685595,0.00026602097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985549,0.000107317916,0.00045213848,0.00011879312,0.00070843205,0.00005842571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071346253,0.0001064425,0.00028282442,0.00022093588,0.0010371812,0.000054249867,0.0005486342,0.00007274871,0.000028258695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037308445,0.00007270488,0.00027851152,0.0005150513,0.00020136652,0.00010579276,0.00012227344,0.0003680817,9.1842037e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087016095,0.00004153804,0.0033712103,0.00007969667,0.0000509177,0.000031342643,0.8319949,0.0011286436,0.0007489482,0.15031274,0.0017979936,0.01035509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032353023,0.00016949733,0.008176675,0.000045255536,0.000034856486,0.0000018459052,0.9539222,0.00000962125,0.000015656864,0.002582889,0.034592856,0.00012509589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022245841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012894422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14772984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012546675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001805485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9842651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381336488","doi":"10.1017/s0047279423000314","title":"Competition and childcare quality: Evidence from Quebec","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University; Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Quality (philosophy); Christian ministry; Subsidy; Demographic economics; Political science; Business; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.060543607976657185,"score_gpt":0.3855921848844354,"score_spread":0.3250485769077782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381336488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9760456,0.0002294269,0.00005229075,0.020540757,0.00035711518,0.0000532537,0.00003135327,0.000031528016,0.0026586496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923016,0.0014609542,0.00007886078,0.00059663254,0.0048650475,6.659609e-7,0.000003964144,0.000007990433,0.00068427774],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986547,0.000279065,0.00029253392,0.00008821917,0.0004639428,0.00022151374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991567,0.00019130528,0.00026675026,0.000050439197,0.0002080074,0.00012678934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084513763,0.000072793315,0.00020333736,0.00014561944,0.0005182672,0.00011465925,0.00017649002,0.00011220786,0.000022903054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006400363,0.00007102237,0.0000985019,0.0004999872,0.00023087076,0.00032408093,0.00003818171,0.00018056727,0.000019074478],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060819628,0.000074371106,0.12703256,0.00004632698,0.00014877036,0.000034138135,0.5268059,0.000016595022,0.0015058588,0.30555433,0.012572784,0.026147565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021350646,0.000020481155,0.91845363,0.000049350987,0.00001847723,7.846549e-7,0.05637342,0.0000058655264,0.000003503249,0.018978424,0.0057911677,0.00009140542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09607018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030118952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79142106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019737468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006247445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98757887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389145832","doi":"10.1017/s0047279423000533","title":"Impact of unconditional cash transfers on household livelihood outcomes in Nigeria","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Canadian Wildlife Federation","funders":"","keywords":"Livelihood; Cash; Food security; Marital status; Malnutrition; Cash transfers; Socioeconomics; Business; Dietary diversity; Multistage sampling; Environmental health; Diversity (politics); Geography; Medicine; Economics; Agriculture; Economic growth; Finance; Population; Political science","score_opus":0.03052004814846746,"score_gpt":0.36095144417225217,"score_spread":0.3304313960237847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389145832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98084,0.000014315339,8.818736e-7,0.012233458,0.00028578713,0.000065132655,0.00017894444,0.000013315613,0.006368109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975166,0.00017674184,0.000005398749,0.00022420275,0.001718442,0.0000011494508,0.000006468206,0.000010562137,0.00034046292],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986852,0.00013860145,0.00035905722,0.00006982,0.00048467622,0.0002626838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940956,0.00010312405,0.0002153695,0.000045848275,0.00011001962,0.000116110255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005121147,0.00009027109,0.00026675256,0.00042310063,0.00025618743,0.000027326038,0.00020821932,0.00010187714,0.00011826576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023000583,0.00007720526,0.00033625882,0.00068860786,0.00013005476,0.00020543952,0.0000052934747,0.00018187307,0.000010276232],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016001184,0.0009833064,0.6248847,0.000026064288,0.00036538718,0.000026510097,0.2703438,0.00025277556,0.00021405007,0.037806313,0.060162224,0.004774818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055192114,0.00013831016,0.98416054,0.000019285078,0.000008928636,0.0000012695731,0.006971267,2.7614837e-7,0.000012852782,0.006836426,0.0012215927,0.000077324716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006163885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022091058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35927582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041754558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002032924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9317991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403700094","doi":"10.1017/s004727942400028x","title":"The dynamic effects of becoming disabled on work, wages and wellbeing in the UK from 1991 to 2018","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Social Policy","topic":"Retirement, Disability, and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Labour economics; Disabled people; Economics; Demographic economics; Psychology; Sociology; Applied psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.06548489135021704,"score_gpt":0.4206611222913489,"score_spread":0.3551762309411318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403700094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9581898,0.00039421924,0.0000041724234,0.038014926,0.00042879337,0.0001891968,0.000002310203,0.0000043393006,0.002772243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978577,0.00038360237,0.00001444609,0.0003345254,0.0012109686,0.000004024429,2.5648333e-7,0.0000063653874,0.00018811584],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867517,0.0003345452,0.0002814044,0.00008685051,0.00040062162,0.00022138425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870694,0.0010348556,0.00010827747,0.000068783425,0.000022950537,0.000058222617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013508722,0.000076815515,0.00016527661,0.00007265151,0.00039438842,0.0001734468,0.00026159643,0.000051197352,0.0000076550605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005110431,0.000044192675,0.000103574304,0.0003422043,0.00023784609,0.000077181845,0.00003769542,0.00019436161,0.000004142013],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000301459,0.0003646755,0.040608067,0.00022252658,0.0003183222,0.000036011123,0.6926992,0.000034762783,0.0019402463,0.083775744,0.023109056,0.15658996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000902163,0.00044236582,0.778564,0.001103581,0.00013573142,0.0000011016143,0.05516264,0.000023035458,0.00016154563,0.1353652,0.027848419,0.0002902157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006873917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003822789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7379559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026659472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000098333985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}