{"meta":{"query_hash":"5466e9d830a1","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History"},"cohort_total":11,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":11,"exported":11,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/5466e9d830a1","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Supreme+Court+History"},"results":[{"id":"W2161250834","doi":"10.1353/sch.2011.0013","title":"Lochner and Constitutional Continuity","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Constitution; Substantive due process; Doctrine; Political science; Constitutional law; Constitutional right; Sociology","score_opus":0.05440738764365759,"score_gpt":0.261243954552733,"score_spread":0.20683656690907543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161250834","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021836825,0.015543043,0.003910819,0.111100666,0.00071201846,0.00004054497,0.000099724966,0.000040553245,0.84671587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8719646,0.004580981,0.0013197768,0.025008915,0.0013497954,0.00012627148,0.000086817156,0.00006141417,0.09550141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99328446,0.0026617902,0.00017772918,0.0014995091,0.00093136297,0.001445083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996609,0.0018092901,0.0002787373,0.0005495066,0.00037180062,0.00038170887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057237325,0.00023661609,0.00043737254,0.0013834098,0.009277209,0.007707516,0.0011511483,0.005266642,0.013321656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00796172,0.00026729263,0.0003168665,0.0012981873,0.045347564,0.008989,0.0072900956,0.007467514,0.000945487],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022524177,0.0000017376113,0.000038592916,0.000002758352,3.8255493e-7,0.000016687107,0.00043512703,0.000020110074,0.000009840888,0.9963935,0.0021054223,0.0009735871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002626413,0.000014608823,0.00049385487,0.00014210418,0.0000048098764,0.00006599332,0.0015086638,0.000100708545,0.00009543317,0.7597518,0.2377793,0.000016464992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019013047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016852094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019013047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013759303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007530148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099831164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360972849","doi":"10.1353/sch.2000.0002","title":"The Naturalization of Douglas Clyde Macintosh, Alien Theologian","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalization; Supreme court; Alien; Divinity; Conscience; Christian ministry; Law; Protestantism; Religious studies; Declaration; Sociology; Classics; Theology; History; Political science; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.01814054330233018,"score_gpt":0.2691512908180439,"score_spread":0.25101074751571373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360972849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0155569045,0.054745775,0.0016242702,0.37841117,0.010161417,0.00002833034,0.00010384672,0.000042180254,0.5393261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50090575,0.014876856,0.0009760985,0.23421836,0.0060336776,0.00011476762,0.00006426673,0.00009101128,0.24271922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780136,0.00075971684,0.000042133033,0.00037177152,0.0006556405,0.00036935144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883324,0.00050598005,0.00008270562,0.000103573184,0.00027510026,0.00019938567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028975205,0.0003169257,0.00021288634,0.0008293355,0.012163832,0.005074591,0.00077676214,0.0029223172,0.003980695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041239606,0.00022788614,0.00018226283,0.0005987438,0.023639617,0.0035603263,0.0031012988,0.007121132,0.00044184725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001665883,0.000009514628,0.00019094736,0.000023977256,0.0000020329999,0.00012484082,0.0057193977,0.00004058206,0.00011906342,0.76919264,0.21882173,0.0057386244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006368916,0.0000034760833,0.00026928983,0.00008773147,0.000001378155,0.00010249758,0.0016064934,0.00003308077,0.00006116675,0.030332413,0.9674865,0.00000959372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09196216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11256282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09196216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013433588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009412643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18285376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360986598","doi":"10.1353/sch.2019.0004","title":"Body and Soul: The Selective Draft Law Cases and World War I","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford; University of Washington; Syracuse University","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Military service; Constitution; Political science; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01585205118714332,"score_gpt":0.26076259264469415,"score_spread":0.2449105414575508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360986598","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16321027,0.017364448,0.0012277607,0.16980055,0.0020593228,0.00017563486,0.0002497836,0.000022745744,0.6458894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8858953,0.010124123,0.0005448499,0.05271744,0.0016282602,0.00033483014,0.00019555965,0.00003413613,0.048525557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99485415,0.0013867118,0.00020830781,0.00045155195,0.0007996221,0.0022997677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944338,0.0035546485,0.0006858844,0.00035103783,0.00034906523,0.0006255211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062373886,0.00069964817,0.0004745959,0.0027976793,0.0165557,0.00801657,0.0019771473,0.01621195,0.006886582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013042495,0.0007496304,0.0008100696,0.0029319786,0.026538521,0.0067872703,0.00762717,0.015579815,0.000672029],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008662795,0.0001006997,0.0031461336,0.00008783167,0.000015244061,0.005067794,0.029364135,0.00013959159,0.00017255616,0.85089624,0.09511331,0.015809808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017461012,0.00015913707,0.014540813,0.002606,0.00006253168,0.005201486,0.12861627,0.000350625,0.0012156068,0.15478088,0.6921562,0.0001357148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046472006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07669736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046472006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00798035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060626604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092403054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361028902","doi":"10.1353/sch.2000.0012","title":"The Clear and Present Danger Test","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Wife; Law; Supreme court; Presidential system; Test (biology); League; Ideology; History; Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Politics","score_opus":0.03814086693857501,"score_gpt":0.2887625941057969,"score_spread":0.2506217271672219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361028902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019868955,0.006487622,0.008629206,0.197647,0.006011112,0.00018026071,0.0009445112,0.00009301911,0.7601383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70378906,0.0043701357,0.0038691247,0.16002381,0.0066690235,0.0008195267,0.0012744245,0.00028728813,0.1188977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9728492,0.009953351,0.001493454,0.0028243563,0.0094872555,0.0033923755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9446728,0.03058985,0.004101294,0.0036986156,0.010753447,0.0061839106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018255875,0.0006725079,0.00080754247,0.0022875858,0.0052587893,0.0071239,0.0026270947,0.008356091,0.06837282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1367775,0.00040399845,0.00069268787,0.0017132661,0.019135982,0.01685422,0.008709955,0.012989832,0.014514707],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021871917,0.00008466557,0.0070799827,0.00009417586,0.000015987947,0.0004031498,0.0013704088,0.00013670973,0.000091903436,0.7770685,0.17235221,0.041083608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009055339,0.00017621779,0.008975544,0.00079920556,0.000027256481,0.0012785911,0.0037238728,0.0006883248,0.00044368836,0.5204743,0.46321487,0.00010762992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005931061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049380553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06837282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035230317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005656359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22872984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361028911","doi":"10.1353/sch.2011.0003","title":"The Passenger Cases Reconsidered in Transatlantic Commerce Clause History","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; State (computer science); Law; Immigration; Commerce Clause; Dormant Commerce Clause; Supreme court; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Federalism","score_opus":0.12005552221719737,"score_gpt":0.28148756933574276,"score_spread":0.1614320471185454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361028911","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14086217,0.015473441,0.0012797067,0.0986683,0.0015146895,0.0000351942,0.00012915068,0.000025101646,0.7420123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8850789,0.004887086,0.00036074326,0.05242391,0.0016671804,0.00004690381,0.00011019017,0.00005250944,0.05537258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967313,0.00086136215,0.00012660447,0.00047060763,0.00068777066,0.0011223849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99742705,0.0015198338,0.00016494234,0.00014306445,0.00048302585,0.00026208995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040514045,0.00026427236,0.00032115993,0.001175012,0.0098224655,0.011974653,0.0015218867,0.012637188,0.005817858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006257265,0.00047854762,0.00044254994,0.002021499,0.017329326,0.0063217888,0.0035077364,0.014630676,0.00046347597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010656311,0.000010113315,0.0006019137,0.000011869261,0.0000022156212,0.0005095246,0.0051017883,0.00007020139,0.00007767214,0.97817355,0.011990833,0.0034395552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003323663,0.00004551456,0.0045718,0.00066521583,0.000020604115,0.0008300129,0.020830197,0.00049077964,0.0004905902,0.13979636,0.8321487,0.0000770127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.069592126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09353699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069592126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010732369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005583098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13837409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361029077","doi":"10.1353/sch.2010.0014","title":"Joining the Court: Pierce Butler","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Honor; Wife; Economic Justice; White (mutation); Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03113289648361357,"score_gpt":0.28065249313179047,"score_spread":0.2495195966481769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361029077","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001968855,0.014639571,0.00037782083,0.7496026,0.022839108,0.000051885625,0.000059890295,0.000077627265,0.2103826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03557875,0.013448922,0.00054269505,0.43979076,0.009910343,0.00008054919,0.000083068066,0.00016682988,0.5003981],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99711204,0.0004647739,0.00006661533,0.0004652524,0.0011486055,0.00074280077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99700207,0.00033960625,0.00007139222,0.00005159755,0.00051656616,0.0020188019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015399898,0.0005395344,0.00044827585,0.0007067938,0.016198434,0.006906768,0.001173962,0.0075250794,0.071922034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007902187,0.00061471626,0.00028031357,0.00059598987,0.0028193614,0.004202635,0.004745506,0.019412352,0.018386777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032217615,0.000010089733,0.000119624965,0.000008692595,9.774917e-7,0.0003868456,0.00046314794,0.0000067658243,0.000033310556,0.0039149188,0.98995143,0.005100848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056943773,0.000005977117,0.00025074778,0.000092311224,0.0000016281759,0.000675099,0.002155348,0.000016824322,0.000035559253,0.001679731,0.99507165,0.000009392238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060294494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.172854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071922034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061297663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010281015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24060315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361029082","doi":"10.1353/sch.2001.0074","title":"A Visit to the Quebec Citadel","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.03035397116800434,"score_gpt":0.2692053274426597,"score_spread":0.23885135627465534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361029082","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014415821,0.064818725,0.0005171149,0.5297386,0.022235151,0.00006587939,0.002051669,0.00020386955,0.36595327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07505162,0.009592146,0.00046490235,0.0490493,0.0019172422,0.000033777895,0.00028751272,0.00015739378,0.86344606],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820256,0.00030616703,0.00002947685,0.00014568205,0.00046657526,0.00084950833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982823,0.00026604332,0.000057754874,0.00007547093,0.0008295789,0.000488849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011586854,0.0005299536,0.0008395307,0.001708923,0.033922486,0.010031749,0.0013429424,0.008159632,0.086301625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043438543,0.0005631456,0.00071285863,0.0030635435,0.00428797,0.002431704,0.0022186264,0.008293433,0.0049643433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000320043,0.000014677896,0.00069460843,0.00004597307,0.000014881935,0.00040921537,0.0014328697,0.00016726155,0.0000973094,0.022459108,0.9637635,0.010868597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062343206,0.0000040437676,0.0024936371,0.00008028976,0.000005262868,0.000043482767,0.0020816466,0.00005252757,0.00003741542,0.0012761225,0.9938984,0.000020872812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98722094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99632484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096170455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.096170455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.074032605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69776875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361029193","doi":"10.1353/sch.2009.0023","title":"Public Diplomacy in the U.S. Supreme Court: The Warren Years—Part II","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Memoir; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Biography; Politics; Diplomacy; Law; Warren Court; State (computer science); Sociology; Art history; History; Political science","score_opus":0.060357327866453515,"score_gpt":0.2870304650667115,"score_spread":0.22667313720025797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361029193","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08982413,0.14867114,0.00059962645,0.41791213,0.0064518135,0.0001808205,0.0006786265,0.00004130771,0.33564037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7314732,0.045925424,0.0004256316,0.09984263,0.010811848,0.0005259574,0.0005581456,0.000057276055,0.110379934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99525523,0.0010049437,0.00013992778,0.0004035664,0.00130817,0.0018882705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996775,0.0013260287,0.0004891077,0.00013266515,0.0003748767,0.0009023803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038301395,0.00040464057,0.00041700975,0.0015506174,0.009155835,0.010415797,0.0014132324,0.00895763,0.007995214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008926245,0.0007061888,0.00046480657,0.0022437347,0.007495412,0.0057266075,0.006781792,0.011508854,0.0009585945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004949158,0.0001852328,0.0059746145,0.00010656276,0.000023459663,0.0006928694,0.011908215,0.00025132412,0.0002706732,0.47460073,0.44730616,0.058630656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003243575,0.00007651327,0.039550655,0.0011859081,0.000023098275,0.00035015214,0.010010858,0.00022398477,0.0003015298,0.03988154,0.90828854,0.00007475802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.104103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20606385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.104103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013846989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012863124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20699412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361029208","doi":"10.1353/sch.2001.0090","title":"Conscience in the Court, 1931–1946: Religion as Duty and Choice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Duty; Law; Politics; Constitution; Citizenship; Allegiance; State (computer science); Political science; Faith; Naturalization; Sociology; Military service; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.030069712302155913,"score_gpt":0.296318543991927,"score_spread":0.26624883168977104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361029208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14196834,0.059513383,0.0019599912,0.2675786,0.0020375962,0.00010631281,0.00022873768,0.000017025093,0.52658993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9553214,0.007080051,0.00030451556,0.01135568,0.00095290586,0.00005428668,0.000030944422,0.000012285889,0.024888031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965814,0.0015085725,0.00013498422,0.00033607826,0.0005961887,0.00084291963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99600714,0.0026501727,0.00033586187,0.00017701877,0.0003693114,0.0004604967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006542788,0.00031214705,0.0003517738,0.0010019357,0.016505072,0.008732076,0.0010188873,0.00907655,0.0043018423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011327214,0.00046735254,0.00038870607,0.0015698837,0.046070486,0.01065986,0.004536978,0.016121985,0.00037560094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034278164,0.000037685022,0.0010402044,0.000015307121,0.0000042426555,0.00031031496,0.022027893,0.00015599898,0.000061454,0.9577917,0.013063503,0.005457415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009527769,0.000043745746,0.012676345,0.00080017943,0.000016453994,0.0003823071,0.023591219,0.00054291036,0.00023532863,0.63380027,0.32770875,0.00010715475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15704386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20052214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15704386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02233833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010390663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31225955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361029483","doi":"10.1353/sch.2015.0025","title":"The Clerks of the Four Horsemen (Part II, George Sutherland and Pierce Butler)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Economic Justice; Law; Civil servant; Peck (Imperial); Character (mathematics); Management; Sociology; Art history; Classics; History; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.1013316183136096,"score_gpt":0.3137323234569229,"score_spread":0.21240070514331333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361029483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011191088,0.02381422,0.0012384305,0.11379769,0.06490655,0.00037683517,0.0007711264,0.00040721512,0.7834968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009986272,0.0024308532,0.00024763378,0.005383256,0.0016216966,0.000044204913,0.00017174009,0.0000883888,0.980026],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994343,0.000070398615,0.000021346701,0.00009460972,0.0002556466,0.00012367826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880147,0.000120640194,0.00006478765,0.000043015996,0.00042527236,0.00054474303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000646324,0.0005159557,0.0003172008,0.0005297031,0.002712193,0.0025728703,0.00051402755,0.0015591207,0.26663208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025782075,0.00033036055,0.00018553366,0.0003591,0.0007950129,0.0014887708,0.0019218004,0.002271521,0.07750429],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007934375,0.000016375689,0.00024163864,0.00002172449,5.660509e-7,0.000049316735,0.00010096965,0.0000096328595,0.0001110519,0.0011632126,0.9802644,0.01801318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025838178,0.00001111838,0.0008975198,0.00004852397,9.12923e-7,0.0001005696,0.0003447697,0.000021861957,0.00010132186,0.00012509957,0.99834204,0.0000036992462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014802031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04203352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26663208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019512353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004065121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89197314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361029625","doi":"10.1353/sch.2004.0017","title":"Justices Seeking the Presidency","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalist; Presidency; Supreme court; Law; Presidential system; Constitution; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03672102118204673,"score_gpt":0.28862080882272645,"score_spread":0.2518997876406797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361029625","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018136805,0.003991798,0.0011770877,0.10807288,0.022589851,0.00019958752,0.00016527729,0.00016076186,0.84550595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1126858,0.0016680307,0.0010620384,0.15587147,0.0067571676,0.00019491436,0.00018754567,0.00017011778,0.7214028],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99495196,0.00042539806,0.00014878077,0.0009982635,0.0013095187,0.002166157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982002,0.00039800128,0.00009047636,0.00012120938,0.00060962787,0.00058059447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022851925,0.0007367974,0.0006216677,0.0011478611,0.020376835,0.009200368,0.0012407919,0.009541425,0.042487204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008700689,0.00058538234,0.00051612564,0.00069205574,0.0030775724,0.0041594165,0.006966738,0.015071834,0.008157024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023701947,0.000053280382,0.00082858047,0.000041148884,0.0000075346866,0.0008109986,0.005058967,0.00003211764,0.0006488138,0.31348878,0.64888346,0.030122558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011775793,0.000028012739,0.0005728912,0.000074573225,0.0000050472217,0.00013452387,0.0015247449,0.000035863606,0.00020457116,0.011887109,0.98550713,0.000013672148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016044844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048053887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042487204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037700117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076240306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14213383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}