{"meta":{"query_hash":"5466e9d830a1","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History"},"cohort_total":11,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":11,"exported":11,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/5466e9d830a1","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Supreme+Court+History"},"results":[{"id":"W2161250834","doi":"10.1353/sch.2011.0013","title":"Lochner and Constitutional Continuity","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Constitution; Substantive due process; Doctrine; Political science; Constitutional law; Constitutional right; Sociology","score_opus":0.05440738764365759,"score_gpt":0.261243954552733,"score_spread":0.20683656690907543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161250834","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.103009544,0.017338071,0.003934948,0.00080905115,0.0045013786,0.00016901718,0.0000042836286,0.000037318565,0.8701964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99711317,0.0001941204,0.00038971312,0.00014995072,0.00059775397,5.59442e-7,8.879626e-8,0.0000031214217,0.0015514989],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991136,0.000070843475,0.00026397032,0.00006866859,0.00035211112,0.00013079529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909914,0.000038900987,0.00026486212,0.00004440672,0.00040470116,0.00014797167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009157731,0.000057920493,0.00017161308,0.00007070541,0.0001704201,0.000012437688,0.00013501149,0.00006904108,0.0006416918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016617686,0.000050559727,0.00005651907,0.000044325494,0.0020796277,0.00039960712,0.000014919512,0.00014900466,0.000010954125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014022933,0.00019687857,0.032335237,0.000049824568,0.00009395199,0.00013526111,0.053737886,7.774985e-7,0.00083566306,0.7363348,0.17166178,0.0044777235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023389334,0.000063033214,0.0024086635,0.00004277844,0.000023949242,0.0000288839,0.0011176261,4.6071835e-7,0.000027716394,0.0016778026,0.99429935,0.00007586598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000910336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030316354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89410365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029559302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000855283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76624745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360972849","doi":"10.1353/sch.2000.0002","title":"The Naturalization of Douglas Clyde Macintosh, Alien Theologian","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalization; Supreme court; Alien; Divinity; Conscience; Christian ministry; Law; Protestantism; Religious studies; Declaration; Sociology; Classics; Theology; History; Political science; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.01814054330233018,"score_gpt":0.2691512908180439,"score_spread":0.25101074751571373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360972849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06969247,0.010869518,0.0003638856,0.0063703707,0.004378924,0.00014398355,0.000011202681,0.00002316125,0.9081465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796002,0.0013376724,0.0002500426,0.00038746148,0.00077426556,5.3696044e-7,8.636254e-7,0.00000450008,0.017644484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988142,0.00020205698,0.0003263766,0.00005253287,0.0004397886,0.00016502458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896514,0.00022576796,0.00030549685,0.00009742494,0.00031918587,0.00008698918],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007645074,0.00006113084,0.00013934205,0.000043178643,0.00030527383,0.00001017126,0.00031678562,0.000060549333,0.0012812398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018869965,0.00004262423,0.00011066606,0.00007416591,0.0015196261,0.00016869434,0.000008800235,0.00016551188,0.000013021695],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089948735,0.000044333694,0.0010459278,0.0000052867413,0.00004800933,0.000010278572,0.0037856584,0.0001359029,0.00011514507,0.85670894,0.1325138,0.0054967566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000113019756,0.000048173217,0.00044245002,0.00001656228,0.000024147106,0.000012739359,0.00070519594,0.000007917744,0.000017114788,0.0011518981,0.9974081,0.000052690313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060989853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026960857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9099077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044960369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014393065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360986598","doi":"10.1353/sch.2019.0004","title":"Body and Soul: The Selective Draft Law Cases and World War I","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford; University of Washington; Syracuse University","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Military service; Constitution; Political science; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01585205118714332,"score_gpt":0.26076259264469415,"score_spread":0.2449105414575508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360986598","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88484114,0.004279239,0.00001549117,0.0048597716,0.0012923466,0.00014015252,0.0000027911324,0.000010376788,0.10455866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899959,0.00017205469,0.00004113999,0.00050641946,0.0003742472,5.9545926e-7,2.686018e-7,0.00000455865,0.008904835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992956,0.00008851941,0.00014568842,0.00006426504,0.00031426016,0.00009167958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923897,0.0002616163,0.0001734653,0.0000395239,0.00023487904,0.00005154546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005802554,0.000049826336,0.00009548077,0.00005661019,0.00019733142,0.000020051548,0.00009435355,0.000029757948,0.00016093928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008406138,0.00003625277,0.000037320362,0.000037184753,0.00020006546,0.0003180592,0.000013836308,0.00015663789,0.00000813147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002333291,0.00013249276,0.052434385,0.000028858332,0.00018574928,0.00006855851,0.047590178,0.000017024206,0.0036573526,0.74985904,0.14459626,0.0011967758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022322849,0.00007851167,0.011125467,0.000028814113,0.000026164644,0.00003594893,0.0010755479,0.000018313274,0.000064921085,0.0017855639,0.9854719,0.0000656238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011920137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037256193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8408756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034281108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016361072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2078983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361028902","doi":"10.1353/sch.2000.0012","title":"The Clear and Present Danger Test","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Wife; Law; Supreme court; Presidential system; Test (biology); League; Ideology; History; Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Politics","score_opus":0.03814086693857501,"score_gpt":0.2887625941057969,"score_spread":0.2506217271672219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361028902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46322742,0.027552733,0.000010279521,0.09420433,0.0030318897,0.0003742054,0.000011736472,0.00004532485,0.41154206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9228969,0.0048705013,0.000074257885,0.00050826895,0.0014751479,0.0000011058229,1.7782195e-7,0.000011996058,0.0701616],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989286,0.00011134822,0.00026545898,0.00006727815,0.0003844553,0.00024287638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915093,0.0002576994,0.00014001307,0.00011469263,0.00012367748,0.00021297071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008557611,0.00006477432,0.000120228004,0.000035533234,0.0005186024,0.00005917713,0.00023958809,0.000055885263,0.0008938488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010151219,0.00004810369,0.00007115455,0.000033713066,0.0004127273,0.00015655922,0.000012855338,0.00024380414,0.00001956716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004742877,0.00008124478,0.0013409359,0.000008390418,0.000025673933,0.000036814043,0.014975067,0.0000037472578,0.00005009764,0.008064193,0.9524798,0.022886656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000154177,0.000075009506,0.0042333337,0.00001405315,0.000014565933,0.000015777381,0.0007369615,0.000010409086,0.0000025159252,0.0012008372,0.99348307,0.000059308884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089241995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005562344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4596695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003709585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003063039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9787017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361028911","doi":"10.1353/sch.2011.0003","title":"The Passenger Cases Reconsidered in Transatlantic Commerce Clause History","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; State (computer science); Law; Immigration; Commerce Clause; Dormant Commerce Clause; Supreme court; Political science; Sociology; Politics; Federalism","score_opus":0.12005552221719737,"score_gpt":0.28148756933574276,"score_spread":0.1614320471185454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361028911","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22811718,0.053099584,0.0003048778,0.010658102,0.010955407,0.0003912767,0.000012018284,0.00006284482,0.6963987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99080443,0.0013810745,0.00036452003,0.00082780654,0.0003836576,0.0000021323808,3.3754304e-7,0.00001030122,0.0062257308],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983433,0.000399891,0.00048359612,0.0000910814,0.00038663507,0.00029548362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838954,0.00071303814,0.0003285807,0.0001484002,0.00024338985,0.0001770275],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00121824,0.00010301851,0.00023175537,0.000118000935,0.00023063381,0.000007514858,0.00033338793,0.00008222641,0.00093556585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038814518,0.00008292114,0.00014410022,0.000056131645,0.0016388547,0.00024953776,0.000009877577,0.0003857949,0.000016719827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002561102,0.00031864198,0.011310038,0.000018573379,0.000100094614,0.0008875217,0.039194904,0.0000041615826,0.00017819964,0.31866378,0.6270018,0.0020661324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022505647,0.000062621955,0.0030804693,0.000036442478,0.000036916725,0.00010310491,0.0026954305,0.0000014237198,0.0000036663193,0.0002849876,0.99336016,0.000109692264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00441693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071062897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76268727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025119078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043126885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361029077","doi":"10.1353/sch.2010.0014","title":"Joining the Court: Pierce Butler","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Honor; Wife; Economic Justice; White (mutation); Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03113289648361357,"score_gpt":0.28065249313179047,"score_spread":0.2495195966481769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361029077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056554087,0.0021146731,0.0006769699,0.023746023,0.007834054,0.00011160892,0.000009640809,0.000030912328,0.908922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98270774,0.00009915462,0.00076271547,0.0027038462,0.0023798728,8.918681e-7,4.5934868e-7,0.000008596869,0.011336726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987044,0.0001155668,0.00028593873,0.000068519876,0.000592613,0.00023297731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987001,0.00029055536,0.00031532723,0.00013488173,0.0003727532,0.00018641731],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001314895,0.00007909731,0.0001554015,0.00006372012,0.0004574999,0.000023613597,0.00040583813,0.00007687857,0.0026062897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003666565,0.00005804559,0.00013280321,0.000047419315,0.0013383251,0.00022551446,0.000020946283,0.0006403902,0.00007004327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013968563,0.000038073405,0.0012726845,0.000002643099,0.000030414814,0.000024765734,0.0036537324,0.000009305902,0.001242357,0.52164084,0.47130045,0.00077076256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000108448876,0.0000258181,0.0006086577,0.000009742807,0.000032943644,0.00004837936,0.0015405098,0.0000041703197,0.000011278109,0.0003442341,0.9971875,0.00007830425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043533716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004309648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92615366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037190085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035142307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99830544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361029082","doi":"10.1353/sch.2001.0074","title":"A Visit to the Quebec Citadel","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.03035397116800434,"score_gpt":0.2692053274426597,"score_spread":0.23885135627465534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361029082","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24075778,0.0143846115,0.0010685027,0.566437,0.00597955,0.0003970148,0.000030139403,0.000037995407,0.17090741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7830478,0.0005456651,0.00014193193,0.020471875,0.003729468,0.0000024390565,1.4306292e-7,0.00001498439,0.1920457],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887305,0.00008710418,0.00022764939,0.00007138272,0.00050183333,0.00023899104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991387,0.000076841396,0.00020392521,0.0001362443,0.0001710332,0.00027323217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080217596,0.000064057254,0.00013237064,0.000094189556,0.00021860503,0.000026409005,0.00045073862,0.000050188013,0.0007864646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033122263,0.00005104162,0.00011845894,0.00015120431,0.00014589781,0.00023855135,0.000014986567,0.00020398082,0.000098906385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024910189,0.000014647497,0.00023052968,0.0000011776292,0.000010998216,0.00004983472,0.016128026,0.000021888358,0.00006946264,0.0040380014,0.9763187,0.0030917898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000113157264,0.000029774366,0.0048770793,0.000022647973,0.000012224858,0.000026224272,0.0006851323,0.0000029921216,0.000002644051,0.00018822381,0.9939714,0.00006850947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16007614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5335081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54596514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00205197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013377777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86112356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361029193","doi":"10.1353/sch.2009.0023","title":"Public Diplomacy in the U.S. Supreme Court: The Warren Years—Part II","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Memoir; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Biography; Politics; Diplomacy; Law; Warren Court; State (computer science); Sociology; Art history; History; Political science","score_opus":0.060357327866453515,"score_gpt":0.2870304650667115,"score_spread":0.22667313720025797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361029193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4635788,0.034495752,0.000048790505,0.13680027,0.0052522933,0.00085337815,0.000008059183,0.00008625167,0.3588764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926364,0.0005732902,0.000016814507,0.0019059109,0.0025882125,0.0000038160165,7.0875126e-7,0.000011644783,0.0022632205],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969451,0.00050636433,0.00064480485,0.00015331445,0.0013129866,0.00043741803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846256,0.00020194105,0.00051895616,0.00025553707,0.00040703543,0.00015396647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004397554,0.0001483393,0.00032148763,0.00017107523,0.0006362354,0.00012367072,0.0012438999,0.00012239051,0.00036784518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065136154,0.00009317363,0.00019611995,0.00036408973,0.00036518695,0.00083233305,0.000038176564,0.0006566887,0.000031273186],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005483101,0.00037271375,0.0028405131,0.00001316317,0.000044365257,0.00011066857,0.0731641,0.000010750002,0.00016512025,0.025370326,0.8908321,0.0070213033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033448968,0.00018768932,0.0099007,0.000064916814,0.000029141353,0.000024533434,0.0034477594,0.0000037798452,0.0000037317325,0.0047266674,0.9811461,0.00013046425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010504386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015864864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5290576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007944111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011864258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48934725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361029208","doi":"10.1353/sch.2001.0090","title":"Conscience in the Court, 1931–1946: Religion as Duty and Choice","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; Duty; Law; Politics; Constitution; Citizenship; Allegiance; State (computer science); Political science; Faith; Naturalization; Sociology; Military service; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.030069712302155913,"score_gpt":0.296318543991927,"score_spread":0.26624883168977104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361029208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47252384,0.009922573,0.00021283992,0.025719719,0.0015453503,0.00016691207,0.0000036654405,0.000015989304,0.48988912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914331,0.0019880328,0.00017211691,0.0030666075,0.0005048509,0.000001114809,2.601645e-7,0.0000036646013,0.002830252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985499,0.00021988143,0.00026272924,0.00010017611,0.0006324248,0.00023491733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988257,0.00047898517,0.00024574698,0.000101315854,0.00020321066,0.00014501408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015685898,0.00007859002,0.00015899877,0.00010252208,0.00029819153,0.000028373059,0.00034447177,0.000057630692,0.00015186645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006188066,0.00006042579,0.000060167506,0.00014933552,0.001709409,0.0003219777,0.00001742761,0.0002870823,0.000012315247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007015326,0.00016140858,0.05005921,0.000009504265,0.000019315,0.0003543007,0.013575237,0.000034486893,0.00036469166,0.65448946,0.2798509,0.0010113633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019619598,0.00006632125,0.0052018655,0.00003037322,0.000016471846,0.00019800625,0.0018655837,0.000006483535,0.000001575237,0.0008582948,0.99148005,0.000078758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003953589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016761397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71162915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063166383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025016102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6298389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361029483","doi":"10.1353/sch.2015.0025","title":"The Clerks of the Four Horsemen (Part II, George Sutherland and Pierce Butler)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Economic Justice; Law; Civil servant; Peck (Imperial); Character (mathematics); Management; Sociology; Art history; Classics; History; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.1013316183136096,"score_gpt":0.3137323234569229,"score_spread":0.21240070514331333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361029483","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60987896,0.0068584643,0.000038239494,0.1839993,0.007764303,0.0002698604,0.000005875715,0.000015178121,0.19116983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685931,0.0003660276,0.000104189174,0.0006152081,0.000713851,0.0000016841101,2.2054714e-7,0.000007541218,0.029598167],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870896,0.00025516763,0.00033523125,0.0000567931,0.00051494595,0.00012891955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982596,0.00024085878,0.0005643715,0.00014950242,0.00067247846,0.00011318734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031248135,0.00005739133,0.0001091287,0.000050117284,0.0005211133,0.000038192426,0.0003198317,0.000055606222,0.00021421784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001178065,0.00003495108,0.0000575535,0.0001130715,0.00040603994,0.0004245957,0.000036398804,0.00036243736,0.000005692707],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004633124,0.000072806484,0.0043173367,0.0000034545608,0.000042684125,0.0000011358139,0.039953627,0.0000045117677,0.00019197962,0.011747742,0.9417022,0.0019162153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020346165,0.000044784847,0.0031025272,0.000013417842,0.0000299022,0.000009928589,0.010303429,0.0000043788123,0.00001147425,0.0007314999,0.98550016,0.000045019486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006442221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084146037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35871416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034746926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019251546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40080348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361029625","doi":"10.1353/sch.2004.0017","title":"Justices Seeking the Presidency","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Supreme Court History","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalist; Presidency; Supreme court; Law; Presidential system; Constitution; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03672102118204673,"score_gpt":0.28862080882272645,"score_spread":0.2518997876406797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361029625","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04890684,0.022554563,0.0061872266,0.026252441,0.006406824,0.00018027565,0.0000051095103,0.00004418203,0.88946253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935248,0.00032042724,0.0007140117,0.00084060314,0.0014101597,6.6137807e-7,1.342345e-7,0.0000048526294,0.0031843875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887866,0.00010054897,0.0002497912,0.000055682252,0.00053145026,0.00018385885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903274,0.00018792228,0.00029933927,0.00008772564,0.0002769254,0.00011537417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007770758,0.000060843362,0.00011770591,0.000052767216,0.00038998798,0.000019235275,0.0003454572,0.000041756473,0.00039739482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036590223,0.00004423883,0.000103345075,0.000060971306,0.0009579369,0.00029121843,0.000016241038,0.00022274285,0.000019328447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014065135,0.00004347235,0.0006110361,0.000008265073,0.00003348504,0.000046999874,0.009386048,0.00038895154,0.00018903082,0.953192,0.035737205,0.0003494671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001342033,0.000035911482,0.00074642577,0.000041173997,0.000057019588,0.000030732008,0.0024700908,0.0000011549254,0.000006865643,0.0021215419,0.9942918,0.000063074374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013959279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041335635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9585546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001011133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004897127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86872923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}