{"meta":{"query_hash":"f3f0fe06afab","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Technical Writing and Communication"},"cohort_total":12,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":12,"exported":12,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/f3f0fe06afab","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Technical+Writing+and+Communication"},"results":[{"id":"W1981698335","doi":"10.2190/tw.40.2.c","title":"Coverage of Team Science by Public Information Officers: Content Analysis of Press Releases about the National Science Foundation Science and Technology Centers","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Technical Writing and Communication","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Agency (philosophy); Diversity (politics); Political science; Library science; Information center; Quarter (Canadian coin); Content analysis; Institution; Public relations; Public administration; Sociology; Social science; Educational research; Law","score_opus":0.2154153762019659,"score_gpt":0.4201955527165455,"score_spread":0.2047801765145796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981698335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9822684,0.00026555132,0.00024035168,0.007117153,0.00004714829,0.0001759955,0.000011698911,0.000019871788,0.009853829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941787,0.004891927,0.00081620703,0.00008683445,0.000010075185,0.0000048603742,0.000005736956,0.0000017516746,0.000003915435],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978874,0.0000984733,0.000602412,0.00010127908,0.0011541904,0.0001562693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99374217,0.0003625162,0.0010205486,0.0003383076,0.0044504213,0.00008603607],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0092195505,0.000060415034,0.00016317783,0.0009329291,0.0013779277,0.0003019018,0.0013386859,0.00006573967,0.000009391094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067044483,0.00004824795,0.000037323596,0.0031931757,0.008645498,0.0020503472,0.0003380786,0.00032342016,2.0117037e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049704515,0.0003242866,0.025489518,0.000033080247,0.00004747418,3.0203008e-8,0.0055942843,0.000018783274,0.5762278,0.20305069,0.00017109104,0.18899326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031125427,0.0009560921,0.75986403,0.0009492332,0.0008315261,0.000092534305,0.08915787,0.023105226,0.024127048,0.0070108194,0.0898261,0.0009669944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025537625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023999994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7343745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018594677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066401844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003022457","doi":"10.2190/3yby-tyny-eqg8-n9fc","title":"Ethics and Technical Communication: The Past Quarter Century","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Technical Writing and Communication","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Technical communication; Technical writing; Rhetoric; Quarter (Canadian coin); Professional communication; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Scholarly communication; Tacit knowledge; Field (mathematics); Period (music); Information ethics; Root (linguistics); Communication studies; Social science; Epistemology; Higher education; Political science; Engineering; History; Computer science; Knowledge management; Law; World Wide Web; Aesthetics; Linguistics; Publishing","score_opus":0.027902712416511443,"score_gpt":0.30212786605204583,"score_spread":0.2742251536355344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003022457","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25203145,0.101300545,0.000114659684,0.20781995,0.00009950656,0.00040059988,0.000015504227,0.00020331347,0.43801448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809304,0.016785882,0.0011776779,0.0006674599,0.00018730381,0.0000071165327,0.0000037365105,0.000009251263,0.00023119475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857855,0.0004356629,0.0005325461,0.000087372275,0.00024604652,0.00011983074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978563,0.0010270914,0.0002734879,0.00057976414,0.00021882074,0.000044508644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020163788,0.00010745679,0.00022263665,0.000054512453,0.0011634041,0.00025952622,0.0005547615,0.000080023055,0.00023465489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001827027,0.00006889816,0.000090151305,0.00005416585,0.0010738915,0.000225426,0.00018095817,0.0012599753,0.000003980358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017199448,0.0007259074,0.002572724,0.000115153314,0.0004481505,0.0000116678475,0.054247435,0.000018891487,0.00035846207,0.6716452,0.048628666,0.2210557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013353049,0.000525939,0.016475242,0.0014709805,0.000881312,0.0009153919,0.103651404,0.00017135982,0.00001915656,0.029253278,0.84462154,0.00067911117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004529405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027689448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79599285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021104941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015234734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8948081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017986549","doi":"10.2190/m8h6-ghbb-dmmg-bhk7","title":"Stylistic Differences in Multilingual Administrative Forms: A Cross-Linguistic Characterization","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Technical Writing and Communication","topic":"linguistics and terminology studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Provincia autonoma di Bolzano - Alto Adige; European Commission","keywords":"German; Linguistics; Variation (astronomy); Linguistic analysis; Reflection (computer programming); Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.0806574349165579,"score_gpt":0.3399678074899456,"score_spread":0.2593103725733877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017986549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99368423,0.00037843216,0.00008541662,0.00037958333,0.0000661513,0.00006507941,0.000009031798,0.000018427416,0.00531363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99888676,0.00038540098,0.00048502808,0.000052739044,0.0001415228,0.000004823092,0.0000074016134,0.0000057098805,0.000030580828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914503,0.000037389145,0.00052954885,0.00007752248,0.0001022664,0.00010821912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899834,0.00022218085,0.00035340965,0.00011976354,0.000275351,0.000030933264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034229565,0.000086708955,0.00021288925,0.00007443959,0.00025548815,0.00013001586,0.0001798883,0.000047746442,0.000008017784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090981496,0.000068346424,0.000038739785,0.000027924612,0.0004136071,0.00009047792,0.00006973497,0.00029832943,6.252204e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015232302,0.0006388491,0.037664652,0.00010074133,0.000068185014,0.000055228385,0.020818481,0.0000058781625,0.0011456696,0.9297902,0.0000033954282,0.009556411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006390427,0.0023431666,0.7352345,0.0032819011,0.00024161662,0.00033575427,0.016317263,0.00045147561,0.0008193909,0.22358146,0.010023395,0.0009796454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000034017718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025377786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7062087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041726395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004101766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27870864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100640752","doi":"10.2190/17av-56gt-6r2g-acp6","title":"The Value of Employee Participation in Strategic Planning","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Technical Writing and Communication","topic":"Accounting and Organizational Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Strategic planning; Plan (archaeology); Schedule; Process (computing); Process management; Business; Value (mathematics); Strategic thinking; Employee engagement; Sales and operations planning; Operations management; Public relations; Knowledge management; Management; Marketing; Engineering; Computer science; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.029609089732829472,"score_gpt":0.2929355495162433,"score_spread":0.2633264597834138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100640752","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.990578,0.0007873929,0.0004179761,0.002144319,0.000026557349,0.000057627574,7.819092e-8,0.000016755217,0.005971327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998958,0.00026939568,0.00048815476,0.00015294125,0.00011117389,0.0000022542984,0.0000018531182,0.0000067015726,0.00000955744],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991445,0.000027140963,0.000503714,0.000051658346,0.00017935706,0.000093616334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989412,0.00020591692,0.0005033757,0.00015493813,0.00018873661,0.0000058220244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013326764,0.000055683602,0.00011135822,0.00011404996,0.00016611144,0.000118774384,0.0002685933,0.000035018962,0.000003585437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028713953,0.00004137424,0.000028151828,0.0003202649,0.000055783526,0.00034134067,0.00012397282,0.000178881,0.0000013208752],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009029703,0.00016781385,0.75686604,0.00006962718,0.00002215337,0.000005485372,0.00006361729,0.0025795891,0.0010224946,0.22834007,0.0004223139,0.010350511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005526727,0.000035819216,0.9353172,0.00049302995,0.000052562482,0.000016871125,0.001332314,0.005684653,0.000031245134,0.0533213,0.0030430264,0.000119278586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000053973625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022581693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17845121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019584473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009870718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16871925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113497049","doi":"10.2190/meve-wb1f-eyb2-y1h1","title":"Learning-To-Communicate and Communicating-To-Learn in Veterinary Medicine: A Survey of Writing, Speaking, and Reading in Veterinary Medical Curricula","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Technical Writing and Communication","topic":"Problem and Project Based Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Auburn University","keywords":"Curriculum; Reading (process); Veterinary education; Medical education; Veterinary medicine; Medicine; Communication skills; Psychology; Pedagogy; Political science","score_opus":0.0494774885194526,"score_gpt":0.38067485791152605,"score_spread":0.33119736939207345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113497049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846741,0.0040919883,0.000016160482,0.0054022386,0.000010176011,0.00018540706,9.38349e-7,0.000028354401,0.005590613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802375,0.015441597,0.0040372177,0.00020442915,0.000028181892,0.000009236757,0.0000038739377,0.000016389957,0.000021579783],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939393,0.0039502997,0.001152676,0.00019293788,0.000455888,0.0003089005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99574643,0.0029628377,0.0004503188,0.00042382898,0.00016055608,0.00025602232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017369946,0.00015382517,0.00052722247,0.00033899772,0.00041158922,0.0000600409,0.0009054381,0.00020793207,0.000042841923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050840136,0.00014859912,0.000035231245,0.0007419368,0.00060242956,0.0002227713,0.00061021815,0.0015569824,9.105042e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004320645,0.00023993185,0.24893166,0.00013334915,0.000019093095,0.000042047544,0.024512963,0.000088787856,0.002467865,0.00079731864,0.00007486614,0.72226006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002045416,0.002844472,0.9541506,0.01141732,0.000030124944,0.0004572774,0.012094486,0.0012995972,0.00001180442,0.0006838481,0.014495649,0.00046936498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008578233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013974281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7217907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000083789266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008698481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99802375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322893328","doi":"10.2190/tw.43.2.d","title":"Metonymy and Plain Language","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Technical Writing and Communication","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Metonymy; Linguistics; Meaning (existential); Element (criminal law); Insider; Computer science; Process (computing); Epistemology; Metaphor; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.01702762444702671,"score_gpt":0.31316131818203524,"score_spread":0.29613369373500853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322893328","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.964356,0.011716501,0.0004877098,0.0016706784,0.000034767556,0.000096620315,0.000001412287,0.000033286196,0.02160301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99495345,0.0004648831,0.004039806,0.00027983275,0.00006386403,0.000009976357,0.0000030635117,0.0000076290457,0.00017749592],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992253,0.00018529058,0.00032012077,0.00007233682,0.00009839201,0.00009851744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991302,0.00026320817,0.00022035524,0.00022984276,0.00009229316,0.00006408693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006751877,0.00006528913,0.00014834866,0.00007518504,0.00009217321,0.000054661938,0.00016403754,0.00008577336,0.00017466993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012605838,0.000051712625,0.00004104808,0.00007243789,0.0000800602,0.00013749351,0.000065976725,0.0003227943,0.000012960518],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095831376,0.00039372873,0.0049400665,0.000049322018,0.00014393915,0.000028284285,0.005094311,3.9026816e-7,0.05005464,0.044897594,0.0072391266,0.8870628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00801414,0.0020163204,0.7692533,0.0014406118,0.000723809,0.007454161,0.10713986,0.00032475847,0.004672054,0.08041232,0.017248508,0.0013001619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000100940066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008121168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88576263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011790221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005695115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21087797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329380760","doi":"10.2190/tw.44.3.f","title":"Hybrid Disciplinarity: Métis and Ethos in Juvenile Mental Health Electronic Records","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Technical Writing and Communication","topic":"Social Work Education and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Mental health; Sociology; Negotiation; Ideology; Discipline; Blame; Discourse analysis; Social psychology; Public relations; Psychology; Social science; Political science; Law; Psychiatry; Literature; Linguistics; Politics","score_opus":0.022276146289482147,"score_gpt":0.38397574817422947,"score_spread":0.3616996018847473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329380760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5958528,0.004773699,0.0005879453,0.3838828,0.00012394642,0.00019761808,0.0000012641324,0.000036306385,0.014543662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907086,0.0062109926,0.0024762505,0.00041311808,0.00007608677,0.0000031039228,0.000001829988,0.0000042826127,0.00010574579],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983608,0.00089190004,0.00034924172,0.000068109286,0.0001596145,0.00017030517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987081,0.0006706159,0.0003581738,0.000114928145,0.00005917119,0.00008900489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060205893,0.000046418623,0.00015206778,0.000061994426,0.00078924646,0.00007570089,0.0001821128,0.000050202558,0.00001880753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083756365,0.000046818597,0.00002725636,0.00017329893,0.00013699883,0.0002085188,0.00007008087,0.00051051343,8.835176e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096042146,0.00038859926,0.030438589,0.000029554598,0.000016923566,6.0970393e-7,0.015135429,0.0000012820814,0.00016822317,0.27770266,0.008862581,0.6671595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010958388,0.0005062722,0.08136934,0.00036878232,0.000024794359,0.00010478734,0.03512192,0.00016689335,0.000024165767,0.09825649,0.7827005,0.00026022256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042156593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000808926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7738379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017125945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016538744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60703254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2556700187","doi":"10.1177/0047281616679112","title":"Instructional Design for Online Learning Environments and the Problem of Collaboration in the Cloud","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Technical Writing and Communication","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Collaborative writing; Cloud computing; Asynchronous communication; Collaborative learning; Computer science; Process (computing); Ambiguity; Knowledge management; Mathematics education; World Wide Web; Psychology","score_opus":0.044244766622961694,"score_gpt":0.38246882827356826,"score_spread":0.3382240616506066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2556700187","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8461183,0.00092892704,0.14012149,0.012126052,0.000029225816,0.0002716901,0.0000020360087,0.000007312373,0.0003950127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8968214,0.00017442569,0.10284666,0.00005361994,0.000045497454,0.000012036593,0.0000011796897,0.0000041607746,0.00004105663],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972601,0.0021349823,0.0003926216,0.00005412785,0.00009766097,0.000060492148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965718,0.0027609803,0.0004731524,0.00012257224,0.00006286839,0.000008642799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0080375075,0.0000460113,0.00012399528,0.00005268755,0.00014361937,0.000013834648,0.0001726365,0.00005467849,0.0000028289423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055374793,0.000022340295,0.000023538742,0.00010163708,0.0002323316,0.00005463419,0.000030432815,0.0003754703,9.477469e-8],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013650612,0.00029317304,0.011373651,0.00002076424,0.00006534901,5.2976577e-7,0.0047296514,0.00015431464,0.021346448,0.14768769,0.0002606853,0.8127027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.021012742,0.002850089,0.7413395,0.001571634,0.00021033101,0.00077713374,0.0206252,0.0009132742,0.0007635635,0.12666886,0.082855344,0.00041231952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000053805334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000015476284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8122904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019424322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010927839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2785656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2745533497","doi":"10.1177/0047281617726278","title":"Rhetorical Genres in Code","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Technical Writing and Communication","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Documentation; Code (set theory); Computer science; Technical writing; Software documentation; Internal documentation; Source code; Software; World Wide Web; Software development; Sociology; Linguistics; Programming language; Political science; Software development process; Set (abstract data type); Software construction","score_opus":0.046890451092055765,"score_gpt":0.35200799602619354,"score_spread":0.3051175449341378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2745533497","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87178606,0.0032699343,0.10980919,0.013534072,0.00010661772,0.0000981732,6.288518e-7,0.000101411475,0.0012938941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9444439,0.00043260082,0.055065442,0.000018017166,0.000025634472,0.0000017824254,1.0156479e-7,0.0000031700138,0.000009395141],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927676,0.00006166675,0.00028346333,0.00007066021,0.00020271822,0.000104722916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982346,0.0006628255,0.00019589742,0.0007518491,0.00009634735,0.00005846644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014670757,0.000043851353,0.00012232571,0.000089176836,0.00016387344,0.00021733165,0.001694859,0.000053969634,7.9924314e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025653318,0.000038636594,0.000030994146,0.00006572056,0.00006126755,0.00038038762,0.00057552586,0.00045752578,9.4469476e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004538585,0.00040973836,0.3219711,0.000065587235,0.000029803645,0.00010441196,0.00037160062,0.00020574102,0.012337231,0.08678099,0.0020226021,0.5756558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005664204,0.00014543317,0.983474,0.00033303536,0.0000035027363,0.000264561,0.000030561987,0.0068620457,0.0005810799,0.005768181,0.0018439218,0.00012723963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022244201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009459537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66150296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005262981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029750838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31494978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220790662","doi":"10.1177/00472816221084270","title":"Tactical Technical Communication and Player-Created (DIY) Patch Notes: A Case Study","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Technical Writing and Communication","topic":"Digital Games and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Technical communication; Rhetoric; Negotiation; Rhetorical question; Ideology; Order (exchange); Sociology; Multimedia; Computer science; Public relations; Engineering; Politics; Political science; Business; Linguistics","score_opus":0.035486026779478846,"score_gpt":0.3530855967087944,"score_spread":0.3175995699293156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220790662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9775313,0.0019818514,0.00009296531,0.0060154004,0.00003136302,0.0003586318,0.0000057134935,0.000080517646,0.013902232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99597514,0.0011297473,0.002575484,0.00013011921,0.00003965631,0.000031175063,0.0000041638264,0.000011743433,0.0001027795],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977089,0.0008946153,0.00060612254,0.0001353243,0.00046614828,0.00018884568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974107,0.0013839407,0.0003886466,0.0004411727,0.00018912318,0.0001863788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003607106,0.00010305456,0.0002635789,0.00011315643,0.00088789687,0.00017613736,0.0005220661,0.00008781837,0.000024381528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011945104,0.00009833586,0.000066385364,0.00032011242,0.0003789987,0.00030039583,0.0006343604,0.00094892376,4.8322414e-7],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005859557,0.006528123,0.07872419,0.000055378445,0.00018953074,0.0012811605,0.032112636,0.000039202976,0.002266977,0.030612793,0.0018003111,0.84580374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007282413,0.0062316353,0.043113362,0.0006928186,0.0007888505,0.030457042,0.6237268,0.00078085036,0.000059128597,0.009260917,0.27618948,0.0014167337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086674385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010498128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.844387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014965027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010360576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68290746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391446694","doi":"10.1177/00472816231226249","title":"Synthetic Genres: Expert Genres, Non-Specialist Audiences, and Misinformation in the Artificial Intelligence Age","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Technical Writing and Communication","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canada Research Chairs; University of Toronto; University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Misinformation; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Visual arts; Computer science; Art","score_opus":0.05695432969174482,"score_gpt":0.3731855147350442,"score_spread":0.3162311850432994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391446694","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8270827,0.01853913,0.010692479,0.052145585,0.00032067695,0.00065392617,0.000005293087,0.000117966985,0.09044228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886878,0.009380097,0.0015268668,0.0002710292,0.00011175391,0.0000017853127,0.0000014464576,0.0000027422811,0.000016440636],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877125,0.0001941787,0.00053972384,0.00005399135,0.0003169128,0.00012393811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990513,0.0005072865,0.00016463711,0.00015101122,0.00006800943,0.000057759436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036225824,0.00006079888,0.00010732179,0.00013274688,0.00037927023,0.00051995926,0.0003523085,0.000073794945,0.000013687883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062667654,0.00004286098,0.000036145688,0.0002822037,0.00028400944,0.00063391717,0.000050214207,0.00032207105,0.0000029823946],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001811036,0.00004198591,0.000018840394,0.000030153424,0.0000054849284,0.0000064324036,0.075404115,0.0000124089975,0.00036269144,0.1084815,0.0011870166,0.81443125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035846853,0.00049471,0.013575726,0.0041281483,0.00007402781,0.0006275304,0.7502281,0.009618546,0.00080474425,0.06330454,0.15607639,0.0007090382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017768698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035974564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81372225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063406624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000070478265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5013979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417202082","doi":"10.1177/00472816251384902","title":"Introduction to Special Issue: Technical Communication In/Against Security Logics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Technical Writing and Communication","topic":"Information and Cyber Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Technical communication; Technical writing; Sociotechnical system; Key (lock); Business communication","score_opus":0.008706800451479143,"score_gpt":0.2761511098494593,"score_spread":0.26744430939798014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417202082","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15098959,0.003548416,0.17196445,0.43127516,0.0011347265,0.0014062953,0.000005694507,0.00062394404,0.23905171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9537784,0.0010842816,0.043391924,0.0013169982,0.0003689562,0.000009422568,0.0000048937586,0.00000389282,0.000041261574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982608,0.0002629189,0.0009131035,0.00014692292,0.0002531829,0.00016305097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980955,0.00021409141,0.0003517824,0.00092201243,0.0003397705,0.000076825636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002361035,0.00011356178,0.00025057248,0.00035905984,0.00022800817,0.00019982431,0.0014198013,0.00015464783,0.000009290869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054827495,0.00010999073,0.00006915704,0.0008110629,0.00009154568,0.00072726177,0.0007750325,0.00083624775,0.0000073067918],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103708386,0.0005811641,0.0012369435,0.00006900352,0.000019932771,0.0000038006503,0.0016492628,0.00019226556,0.0017436505,0.64507556,0.096063755,0.25326097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026081346,0.0004874284,0.058312822,0.0013402371,0.000046256006,0.00034015966,0.0017375178,0.00936909,0.0021410096,0.12248507,0.80034703,0.00078526855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010093511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056085944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8027888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018446762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006932126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44852918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}