{"meta":{"query_hash":"f3f0fe06afab","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Technical Writing and Communication"},"cohort_total":12,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":12,"exported":12,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/f3f0fe06afab","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Technical+Writing+and+Communication"},"results":[{"id":"W1981698335","doi":"10.2190/tw.40.2.c","title":"Coverage of Team Science by Public Information Officers: Content Analysis of Press Releases about the National Science Foundation Science and Technology Centers","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Technical Writing and Communication","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Agency (philosophy); Diversity (politics); Political science; Library science; Information center; Quarter (Canadian coin); Content analysis; Institution; Public relations; Public administration; Sociology; Social science; Educational research; Law","score_opus":0.2154153762019659,"score_gpt":0.4201955527165455,"score_spread":0.2047801765145796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981698335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9773557,0.00085816346,0.0008412469,0.0012164819,0.00012499446,0.00014592889,0.0020222897,0.0000857206,0.01734942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912572,0.0012482894,0.0011631764,0.0004115187,0.00037338506,0.00026995727,0.002262943,0.00007709602,0.002936506],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.993853,0.0025265648,0.0007606647,0.00040027525,0.0020771425,0.00038242788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.828469,0.11702881,0.035765644,0.0040639583,0.01185569,0.0028168315],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007291248,0.0002460022,0.0003578673,0.009592875,0.0012643292,0.0028776133,0.0004027819,0.00044031694,0.003798396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062394943,0.00022040242,0.0001863748,0.009188631,0.0007967816,0.0021628994,0.0014858256,0.00071424205,0.000587662],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00094644947,0.00045428987,0.5878632,0.0027286285,0.00027833524,0.0007730967,0.12626512,0.0004029002,0.0070372666,0.0019799788,0.025867218,0.24540359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033719745,0.0003079775,0.86343557,0.0006409092,0.00011079479,0.00033737856,0.09014334,0.000743613,0.0018345779,0.00031921212,0.042033978,0.000058900216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023939926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027525222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9971224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011024437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012531213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03856021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003022457","doi":"10.2190/3yby-tyny-eqg8-n9fc","title":"Ethics and Technical Communication: The Past Quarter Century","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Technical Writing and Communication","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Technical communication; Technical writing; Rhetoric; Quarter (Canadian coin); Professional communication; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Scholarly communication; Tacit knowledge; Field (mathematics); Period (music); Information ethics; Root (linguistics); Communication studies; Social science; Epistemology; Higher education; Political science; Engineering; History; Computer science; Knowledge management; Law; World Wide Web; Aesthetics; Linguistics; Publishing","score_opus":0.027902712416511443,"score_gpt":0.30212786605204583,"score_spread":0.2742251536355344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003022457","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018673223,0.6044368,0.006349233,0.19465896,0.006302866,0.000023298866,0.00005737129,0.00005515838,0.16944307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54609436,0.35417053,0.004872545,0.03468649,0.016083509,0.00016585406,0.000080521444,0.0001888833,0.043657385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890013,0.0073482795,0.00052648573,0.0007980047,0.0018115753,0.00051424553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9774485,0.017145064,0.0013867317,0.00090371474,0.0021358163,0.0009801674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007323531,0.0006108944,0.0006956327,0.0043940675,0.0073569966,0.016371597,0.0008801675,0.00833631,0.005979358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015144575,0.0003780963,0.00029858493,0.0055065104,0.035308767,0.018561546,0.004473251,0.007591544,0.0009166752],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004673187,0.000042042262,0.0004958395,0.0008433541,0.000013151544,0.0002458986,0.05124536,0.00026514422,0.00021212142,0.86338884,0.02220916,0.060992416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009987781,0.00003200119,0.00090111437,0.0029354517,0.000007698647,0.0005557585,0.023788864,0.0002451508,0.0001930699,0.19763866,0.7736638,0.000028308335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002751534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00189305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016371597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009999324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005272761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072550476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017986549","doi":"10.2190/m8h6-ghbb-dmmg-bhk7","title":"Stylistic Differences in Multilingual Administrative Forms: A Cross-Linguistic Characterization","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Technical Writing and Communication","topic":"linguistics and terminology studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Provincia autonoma di Bolzano - Alto Adige; European Commission","keywords":"German; Linguistics; Variation (astronomy); Linguistic analysis; Reflection (computer programming); Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.0806574349165579,"score_gpt":0.3399678074899456,"score_spread":0.2593103725733877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017986549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9807248,0.0004017013,0.0017395036,0.00015507561,0.000017599292,0.000030215835,0.00019714027,0.000015999496,0.016717838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979527,0.00014154753,0.0010111139,0.000021636972,0.000014845382,0.00002011348,0.00020318602,0.00002777707,0.0006071116],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967964,0.0016801113,0.0003423324,0.00038186877,0.00063991314,0.00015936568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879886,0.0076709203,0.001960123,0.0011845796,0.0009805014,0.00021519128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023996662,0.0001974422,0.00027751797,0.00394396,0.0016680626,0.0028258734,0.00031948948,0.00024095878,0.0020107306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011859338,0.00017334668,0.00017035626,0.0039795684,0.0030264405,0.0013048085,0.0023521709,0.00048193304,0.00024298021],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005072854,0.00014006726,0.20539738,0.00070540886,0.00010803903,0.0021779418,0.5887761,0.0009507326,0.021130646,0.04759879,0.0027801627,0.12972757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048317772,0.0001446911,0.6723297,0.00029459683,0.0001062957,0.0022689472,0.19719987,0.0019578096,0.0063153678,0.007859906,0.11137193,0.000102621125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029518774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072456244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00394396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011767688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012690783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100640752","doi":"10.2190/17av-56gt-6r2g-acp6","title":"The Value of Employee Participation in Strategic Planning","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Technical Writing and Communication","topic":"Accounting and Organizational Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Strategic planning; Plan (archaeology); Schedule; Process (computing); Process management; Business; Value (mathematics); Strategic thinking; Employee engagement; Sales and operations planning; Operations management; Public relations; Knowledge management; Management; Marketing; Engineering; Computer science; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.029609089732829472,"score_gpt":0.2929355495162433,"score_spread":0.2633264597834138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100640752","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39517173,0.0030647987,0.05616785,0.06394421,0.0012041535,0.00047130865,0.00010556088,0.0005061146,0.47936425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803767,0.00053556275,0.008592438,0.0013559181,0.00021570969,0.00021300778,0.000056398883,0.000060869945,0.008593368],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8989813,0.08698852,0.0011091501,0.0014529361,0.008082875,0.0033852388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8149407,0.14078538,0.009954274,0.009455847,0.009976246,0.014887546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045565087,0.00046781808,0.00036157094,0.001569354,0.0055253096,0.01241769,0.0015986521,0.0029048352,0.0054317224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09778913,0.00048710062,0.00051755505,0.0015422873,0.005267082,0.0060525257,0.009539658,0.0034884962,0.0011009387],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010059832,0.0009901985,0.04299778,0.0005152338,0.00016976873,0.0007779034,0.092029765,0.0036848765,0.0010659951,0.120701104,0.03193933,0.70412207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056404644,0.002267561,0.051023703,0.0022880086,0.00028152904,0.0015330683,0.100100435,0.01420631,0.0029082315,0.26724678,0.557237,0.00034340488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002273385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031874445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045565087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029119598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00885524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24097407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113497049","doi":"10.2190/meve-wb1f-eyb2-y1h1","title":"Learning-To-Communicate and Communicating-To-Learn in Veterinary Medicine: A Survey of Writing, Speaking, and Reading in Veterinary Medical Curricula","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Technical Writing and Communication","topic":"Problem and Project Based Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Auburn University","keywords":"Curriculum; Reading (process); Veterinary education; Medical education; Veterinary medicine; Medicine; Communication skills; Psychology; Pedagogy; Political science","score_opus":0.0494774885194526,"score_gpt":0.38067485791152605,"score_spread":0.33119736939207345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113497049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99824595,0.00032680001,0.00012218101,0.000325931,0.000013761458,0.000041980824,0.00004783692,0.0000063628663,0.00086922443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979405,0.00067997014,0.00040189753,0.00032780418,0.000016496891,0.000050211467,0.00011527,0.000005935297,0.00046197922],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99446833,0.0016455824,0.0007252702,0.00029705762,0.0019854188,0.0008782309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97421414,0.0068683303,0.008676282,0.00050719554,0.0043159425,0.0054181353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047124545,0.00022183204,0.00035080846,0.0019060532,0.0010642436,0.0012897797,0.00040828105,0.00073811406,0.0012100172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021499652,0.00033309043,0.00024377009,0.0013006484,0.0009567469,0.0009784121,0.0013026759,0.00077976356,0.00038135715],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006307251,0.0002125922,0.94231945,0.0002043,0.000017961167,0.00015741421,0.021593265,0.00007444582,0.0010207687,0.00009651875,0.0010937419,0.033146415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000905793,0.0003821539,0.9606227,0.000121311146,0.0000068703516,0.0003182254,0.032544382,0.00024690232,0.0002491323,0.00006306348,0.0054125227,0.000023616756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00988692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019911602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00988692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015300375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003688121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024922073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322893328","doi":"10.2190/tw.43.2.d","title":"Metonymy and Plain Language","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Technical Writing and Communication","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Metonymy; Linguistics; Meaning (existential); Element (criminal law); Insider; Computer science; Process (computing); Epistemology; Metaphor; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.01702762444702671,"score_gpt":0.31316131818203524,"score_spread":0.29613369373500853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322893328","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22138973,0.025668986,0.18574773,0.026234513,0.0018535266,0.00013368753,0.00032472366,0.00058850204,0.5380587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96303326,0.0021379367,0.020368066,0.0012235001,0.00036793776,0.00007507136,0.00011547208,0.0001594544,0.012519342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963714,0.00208481,0.00027904933,0.00047608046,0.0005961176,0.00019258636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945745,0.002802443,0.0008256197,0.0008498616,0.0006808879,0.00026661638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019446162,0.00041808528,0.00038686802,0.0016306015,0.0017966699,0.004808456,0.00069475855,0.0013843033,0.0054386253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009911353,0.00030261689,0.00030266738,0.0011922698,0.01421083,0.014756582,0.0039406274,0.0020350048,0.0009473988],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047253256,0.000012951123,0.00047780207,0.0001477523,0.000009279799,0.00034475268,0.016579809,0.00012992075,0.0013860137,0.9622454,0.0024814275,0.016137691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028524011,0.00006344856,0.0014358021,0.00024312233,0.000014894936,0.0021077117,0.009904185,0.0007610253,0.0012241378,0.81901705,0.16515839,0.00004164794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005801603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046185058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054386253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011427554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010097293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01819402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329380760","doi":"10.2190/tw.44.3.f","title":"Hybrid Disciplinarity: Métis and Ethos in Juvenile Mental Health Electronic Records","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Technical Writing and Communication","topic":"Social Work Education and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethos; Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Mental health; Sociology; Negotiation; Ideology; Discipline; Blame; Discourse analysis; Social psychology; Public relations; Psychology; Social science; Political science; Law; Psychiatry; Literature; Linguistics; Politics","score_opus":0.022276146289482147,"score_gpt":0.38397574817422947,"score_spread":0.3616996018847473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329380760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6733839,0.0030923923,0.058759067,0.040650405,0.0007863391,0.00016825565,0.000081424754,0.00015433088,0.22292383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99290305,0.00016498516,0.0035822515,0.000724234,0.00011926453,0.000038699036,0.000016126758,0.000036929094,0.002414402],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8899971,0.09439973,0.0028670894,0.0028254779,0.008407335,0.0015032284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86374646,0.10848753,0.011020251,0.009053197,0.004895937,0.0027967065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047904447,0.00040044234,0.00045841577,0.004858464,0.018855037,0.019082444,0.0014631818,0.0030765643,0.002460919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09323416,0.00054943754,0.0002705986,0.0027035717,0.045074914,0.015164191,0.015771106,0.0046292455,0.0004067828],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060447444,0.000028170867,0.003866427,0.00010177006,0.000010519327,0.00048689818,0.6504471,0.00008317059,0.0006371375,0.32519558,0.0015411135,0.017541677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044297532,0.00012739166,0.0037955474,0.0010497236,0.000027073194,0.0018520899,0.6962538,0.0015922114,0.0018117899,0.15479665,0.13857104,0.00007836048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010273033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013912978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047904447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004607739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004804846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25334597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2556700187","doi":"10.1177/0047281616679112","title":"Instructional Design for Online Learning Environments and the Problem of Collaboration in the Cloud","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Technical Writing and Communication","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Collaborative writing; Cloud computing; Asynchronous communication; Collaborative learning; Computer science; Process (computing); Ambiguity; Knowledge management; Mathematics education; World Wide Web; Psychology","score_opus":0.044244766622961694,"score_gpt":0.38246882827356826,"score_spread":0.3382240616506066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2556700187","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3016449,0.001835117,0.64427954,0.008647226,0.00034978142,0.0011188661,0.0000584462,0.0008383421,0.04122771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6304042,0.0005359957,0.36298585,0.0005455045,0.000100019744,0.0011084012,0.000038423237,0.00014006627,0.0041414867],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9730023,0.022498054,0.0010121264,0.0009770913,0.0018702756,0.00064023165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88669705,0.098559566,0.0044844686,0.0050933193,0.0030411424,0.002124508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020666208,0.000675518,0.0006168275,0.0009695395,0.003629628,0.0080570895,0.0023147627,0.0022878197,0.0041018785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07065488,0.00058449584,0.00056695193,0.0009182763,0.0048803757,0.005000884,0.0037782267,0.0021156743,0.00058210496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006001845,0.0029295005,0.018511694,0.002588107,0.000096456126,0.0013286804,0.07074341,0.018244801,0.012445028,0.34993702,0.0077541354,0.514821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012934088,0.0028603808,0.011979141,0.00193665,0.00023894373,0.0027374001,0.05283933,0.097680986,0.024604475,0.56317455,0.24044628,0.00020843635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008068002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011017433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020666208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028450654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003612541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10929465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2745533497","doi":"10.1177/0047281617726278","title":"Rhetorical Genres in Code","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Technical Writing and Communication","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Documentation; Code (set theory); Computer science; Technical writing; Software documentation; Internal documentation; Source code; Software; World Wide Web; Software development; Sociology; Linguistics; Programming language; Political science; Software development process; Set (abstract data type); Software construction","score_opus":0.046890451092055765,"score_gpt":0.35200799602619354,"score_spread":0.3051175449341378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2745533497","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.438752,0.01052103,0.057346758,0.013500306,0.0010482665,0.00023667248,0.00045825847,0.00033840621,0.47779834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9762114,0.0015021784,0.011231617,0.0005690979,0.00049474544,0.00013585016,0.00019882523,0.00023138904,0.009425002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99094605,0.0049151727,0.0004684972,0.0006990567,0.0023484293,0.0006227556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9321851,0.049591918,0.0076466277,0.0029696042,0.0054076053,0.002199175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005959032,0.0005438018,0.00046878634,0.017430091,0.0072226604,0.01128826,0.0009731102,0.002125759,0.007381713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04765741,0.00040713817,0.0005270841,0.008278814,0.014011741,0.012332098,0.0057845227,0.00260844,0.0011984434],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001252676,0.000092021175,0.012765135,0.0005169751,0.00002047238,0.0007105954,0.29172975,0.00043191595,0.0032802385,0.62209576,0.004316839,0.06391505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069708716,0.00018742138,0.0276075,0.0016841057,0.000055815544,0.002713801,0.19290516,0.004944597,0.003901685,0.45236522,0.31344113,0.00012394573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002055887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024285826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017430091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038437087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002061105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031514764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220790662","doi":"10.1177/00472816221084270","title":"Tactical Technical Communication and Player-Created (DIY) Patch Notes: A Case Study","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Technical Writing and Communication","topic":"Digital Games and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Technical communication; Rhetoric; Negotiation; Rhetorical question; Ideology; Order (exchange); Sociology; Multimedia; Computer science; Public relations; Engineering; Politics; Political science; Business; Linguistics","score_opus":0.035486026779478846,"score_gpt":0.3530855967087944,"score_spread":0.3175995699293156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220790662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9069236,0.0004817904,0.027491985,0.0021177116,0.00013026051,0.0006148346,0.00012223651,0.000089164176,0.06202844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9735877,0.00042125356,0.010721073,0.00031664013,0.00004582099,0.00036929155,0.000041397554,0.000074825155,0.01442206],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899422,0.0073181423,0.00028570305,0.00067684916,0.0011808275,0.00059625896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97656333,0.019418575,0.0010968246,0.0012830805,0.0007775589,0.00086058443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007126889,0.00068108056,0.00039135007,0.0018856487,0.009327115,0.00546318,0.0021078114,0.0033367993,0.005158326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017808175,0.0005733182,0.0004398146,0.0013545888,0.008599837,0.004466359,0.0060246326,0.0028079038,0.0009415236],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018763987,0.0006440016,0.008200367,0.00048160114,0.00001669323,0.019650258,0.8792644,0.00053554686,0.004490305,0.041702185,0.0026738578,0.042153195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007327291,0.00063814357,0.0053468244,0.00058858725,0.000033632634,0.014959923,0.82931286,0.0022068983,0.008458502,0.0075412993,0.13076422,0.000075913835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029134068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006823047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009327115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026538721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017677046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037690997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391446694","doi":"10.1177/00472816231226249","title":"Synthetic Genres: Expert Genres, Non-Specialist Audiences, and Misinformation in the Artificial Intelligence Age","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Technical Writing and Communication","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canada Research Chairs; University of Toronto; University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Misinformation; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Visual arts; Computer science; Art","score_opus":0.05695432969174482,"score_gpt":0.3731855147350442,"score_spread":0.3162311850432994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391446694","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8692166,0.0037167792,0.025069527,0.0062133344,0.00039689278,0.0004816415,0.00097388803,0.00009369171,0.09383759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848274,0.0010527669,0.008270772,0.0004712672,0.0003011043,0.00025386302,0.00039004718,0.000043576925,0.00438909],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946471,0.003460953,0.00035893754,0.00033715268,0.0010469214,0.00014897338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9462349,0.04060432,0.00552754,0.0030691018,0.0026783878,0.0018857567],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008800684,0.0003692461,0.00041108832,0.007268983,0.0027576012,0.007878823,0.0006090477,0.001144729,0.006175588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046199,0.00016596708,0.00037680706,0.0049875793,0.0041277674,0.005457043,0.0031737883,0.0011302943,0.00064080907],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00087993615,0.0006709758,0.12173199,0.0022732518,0.00010423488,0.0013116538,0.29269454,0.0018955907,0.0059553487,0.3814265,0.008858621,0.18219726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018777448,0.0012959801,0.16202797,0.0017748105,0.00015496205,0.0029328784,0.29372373,0.012207275,0.0076123285,0.32119715,0.19669794,0.0001872366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063857523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012514812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9972424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016733739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012000317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046543002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417202082","doi":"10.1177/00472816251384902","title":"Introduction to Special Issue: Technical Communication In/Against Security Logics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Technical Writing and Communication","topic":"Information and Cyber Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Technical communication; Technical writing; Sociotechnical system; Key (lock); Business communication","score_opus":0.008706800451479143,"score_gpt":0.2761511098494593,"score_spread":0.26744430939798014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417202082","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00050847256,0.012657403,0.0033988925,0.04761079,0.87532836,0.00005782279,0.0007790785,0.0004617807,0.059197348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006351549,0.010367808,0.0010677736,0.015862694,0.8407354,0.00009556187,0.0013751956,0.00083399814,0.12331005],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997773,0.00039914792,0.0002400294,0.00042343856,0.00090865494,0.00025580573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99067533,0.0039020644,0.00061784126,0.00071518176,0.0026921832,0.0013973151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022500171,0.0019434986,0.0017410184,0.006025735,0.0025430396,0.007862459,0.0015266975,0.004026616,0.12359703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009310879,0.00056758744,0.0012198525,0.0029917336,0.0017389902,0.006035024,0.0026276656,0.006062646,0.04627367],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014188054,0.000012284113,0.000042221425,0.00010397962,0.0000033884144,0.000027716647,0.000023424225,0.000025660907,0.000109580076,0.002837374,0.9865111,0.010289149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010697295,0.000033632634,0.0005021129,0.00030572453,0.000011499344,0.00016464283,0.00006209796,0.00018140754,0.00017586612,0.0042506675,0.99428755,0.000014090593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010903593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023086197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12359703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022290025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00228628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41347325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}