{"meta":{"query_hash":"a3ad2e618c88","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics"},"cohort_total":18,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":18,"exported":18,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a3ad2e618c88","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Theoretical+Politics"},"results":[{"id":"W1972355832","doi":"10.1177/0951629803015002645","title":"Institutionalism as a Methodology","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":215,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Institutionalism; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Axiom; Core (optical fiber); Economics; Class (philosophy); Positive economics; New institutionalism; Historical institutionalism; Neoclassical economics; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07010984092665977,"score_gpt":0.2939530061150081,"score_spread":0.2238431651883483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972355832","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3524407,0.0009913243,0.06614537,0.0022418418,0.002245413,0.00007110678,0.00005472347,0.000012891531,0.5757966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98574686,0.000054443142,0.012107313,0.0014323066,0.00025667317,0.0000010268342,8.470838e-7,0.00000932853,0.00039120662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986598,0.000115240706,0.0008262626,0.00011842102,0.000028833058,0.00025146204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886435,0.00033973416,0.0003647245,0.00017624641,0.00006821021,0.00018671126],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019232713,0.00009973364,0.00038014253,0.00018839112,0.000104612045,0.000028513512,0.00021232285,0.00011625415,0.0025152306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037916303,0.00009805837,0.00021289109,0.00008482812,0.0007825926,0.00017909498,0.000021169551,0.00027606697,0.0005359764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010753221,0.00007236075,0.00027854572,0.0000040239856,0.000051938594,0.000013916792,0.00013574531,0.000048729406,0.000011191101,0.99909836,0.00025068325,0.000023749873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034367657,0.000096794334,0.00008475198,0.000008121729,0.000011353082,0.00044316746,0.000067126886,0.00002214721,0.00039864914,0.854059,0.14436969,0.00009552493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006289277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.0757297e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63330615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000116439754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011647472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99839664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980384778","doi":"10.1177/0951629811398687","title":"Paradox lost: Explaining and modeling seemingly random individual behavior in social dilemmas","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Social dilemma; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Probabilistic logic; Function (biology); Psychology; Economics; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.09402872992152556,"score_gpt":0.353519939892713,"score_spread":0.25949120997118746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980384778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98581713,0.00016708857,0.00011190043,0.0002748563,0.00021327203,0.00010842582,0.00000836608,0.0000070815554,0.013291886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979932,0.00005334707,0.0014150754,0.000107911714,0.0003958856,0.0000039050774,4.4094537e-7,0.00001398368,0.00001628944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984499,0.00017899531,0.00056314375,0.00011719891,0.0002754033,0.0004153391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931204,0.00017913796,0.0001772065,0.00005460963,0.00008190412,0.00019511345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011651763,0.00012410508,0.00035050898,0.00013148555,0.00030628982,0.000060788912,0.0002319307,0.00013123763,0.00011808573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024647306,0.00011585355,0.00010776217,0.0000704047,0.001112236,0.00022501806,0.000114094335,0.00033894155,0.0000044053104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089082525,0.00013652332,0.020999322,0.0000032017467,0.000018996963,0.000055127886,0.05668836,0.0000019803297,0.00004376806,0.921719,0.000023517738,0.00022107775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0052045262,0.00058155035,0.0072708996,0.00013993276,0.00043861836,0.000093196686,0.10187315,0.0005867462,0.0012306212,0.88170063,0.00016734289,0.00071277155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017475874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024355048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045184787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016034342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000096908305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47243708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019223278","doi":"10.1177/0951629810375643","title":"Evaluating the Unfairness of Representation With the Nash Social Welfare Function","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Apportionment; Social welfare function; Index (typography); Representation (politics); Welfare; Function (biology); Nash equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Economics; Social Welfare; Public economics; Logarithm; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Political science; Computer science; Market economy; Law","score_opus":0.05754395389845783,"score_gpt":0.4239780069297339,"score_spread":0.3664340530312761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019223278","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9349622,0.0000075737375,0.0006427512,0.059582017,0.00042847794,0.00013197178,0.0000024458955,0.0000061437236,0.004236394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99816763,3.920512e-7,0.00007473862,0.00018629794,0.0014704092,0.0000028538245,5.15915e-7,0.00000723421,0.00008991426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793243,0.00066039216,0.00036032693,0.00006241485,0.00073075056,0.00025367126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980779,0.00071702816,0.00034605162,0.00011591778,0.00064952683,0.000093525654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023610292,0.00006598681,0.0001500617,0.000027590819,0.00065054174,0.00006272288,0.00022534041,0.000085831314,0.00018511337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012595705,0.000031472722,0.000097296106,0.00019384411,0.001513076,0.00010887397,0.000017940376,0.00038776046,0.000002163305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005760265,0.000027568161,0.001169905,0.000006980173,0.000023456878,5.0118194e-7,0.0022884547,0.000014697741,0.00081626355,0.9948701,0.00017967926,0.0005447883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006682417,0.0010389219,0.03509419,0.000038240352,0.00040920608,0.000020385198,0.008583631,0.00054245396,0.0015951545,0.9455868,0.0062527843,0.00016999371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000390541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002183328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06320542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004013584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016199923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5574992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027958363","doi":"10.1177/0951629804043203","title":"Proximity, Directionality, and the Riddle of Relative Party Extremeness","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Ideal (ethics); Perception; Political science; Comparative politics; Positive economics; Sociology; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03920281316605294,"score_gpt":0.3443194872860485,"score_spread":0.30511667411999555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027958363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.944088,0.00022473223,0.0024915533,0.028728573,0.00037709586,0.0002238971,0.000009676638,0.0000092487,0.023847245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991095,0.0000115582925,0.00019025487,0.00014963286,0.00042673643,0.000001795656,2.1560544e-7,0.000004526891,0.000105774314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830437,0.0005282192,0.00044145258,0.00005828358,0.00043844266,0.00022921794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983298,0.0008414271,0.00023105984,0.000075558964,0.00034729746,0.00017483106],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019987635,0.000063631735,0.00022903217,0.000032429492,0.00020403275,0.00003122406,0.00012359464,0.00007128064,0.000050326376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019901327,0.000037484024,0.000102520506,0.000114628805,0.0028392745,0.00016644166,0.000028559296,0.00018079036,0.0000020042476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004293458,0.000060180275,0.002321053,0.000012972733,0.000027678652,0.0000012054002,0.0018673075,0.000008098495,0.000031506752,0.99556375,0.000023251481,0.00004005289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007024312,0.00008850881,0.0024920355,0.000056236822,0.00006204374,0.0000083006435,0.00026005163,0.000012462092,0.00047087474,0.99497783,0.0008220735,0.0000471445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00097168796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000863919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05502153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000102408216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020066784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037312320","doi":"10.1177/095169280201400108","title":"The Schartz-Metterclume Method","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"American Political Science Association","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Phenomenon; Statistical analysis; Epistemology; Econometrics; Statistical hypothesis testing; Sociology; Mathematics; Computer science; Positive economics; Statistics; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01000125112375422,"score_gpt":0.29446271657801004,"score_spread":0.2844614654542558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037312320","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40680134,0.00075821375,0.31128374,0.104172975,0.004083819,0.00033697937,0.00009954443,0.00003757484,0.17242582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99519074,0.000013337139,0.0029512593,0.00055558566,0.00089240127,6.5701676e-7,2.60621e-7,0.000009738236,0.00038599392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901146,0.00012092047,0.00034900493,0.000055184355,0.0002103227,0.00025313822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989316,0.00046206464,0.00016486364,0.00013903595,0.00015731338,0.00014512215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046925806,0.00008071901,0.00015563135,0.00002443572,0.00020395435,0.00009656147,0.00027671477,0.000031594813,0.0005956105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000775057,0.000049967693,0.00019001639,0.00006439783,0.00033358682,0.00006406205,0.00004114707,0.00031095097,0.0000378191],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019155339,0.00003482299,0.00040076638,0.0000010116372,0.000037715527,0.0000015534157,0.000116684816,0.000011088261,0.000027183201,0.9941088,0.0018428091,0.0034156486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018153343,0.00005954652,0.00011729671,0.000012712043,0.000025562393,0.000008443358,0.00018876327,0.0062367436,0.00014980689,0.9695845,0.023358343,0.00007672184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000046917203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.323804e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5883894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020906733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001903146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6521517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068727666","doi":"10.1177/0951629807080774","title":"Justice Preferences and the Arrow Problem","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Social choice theory; Social welfare function; Arrow; Normative; Economics; Condorcet method; Redistribution (election); Majority rule; Voting; Function (biology); Welfare; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.032161730264083276,"score_gpt":0.2570972878179075,"score_spread":0.22493555755382424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068727666","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7980148,0.0022109493,0.022500118,0.0040456895,0.0010428072,0.00017767058,0.000017075608,0.000013903985,0.17197698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99790055,0.0000420288,0.0009091204,0.00037679146,0.00053062395,4.6417148e-7,1.5197318e-7,0.00000881333,0.00023146566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874353,0.000068380745,0.00078706874,0.000088479384,0.000055605098,0.00025693563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825394,0.000942401,0.00048093926,0.00012667995,0.00006645517,0.00012957379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005621144,0.000087479806,0.0003280342,0.00008756439,0.00009657765,0.000064270935,0.00022994858,0.000070221395,0.000079092584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010023605,0.000056095312,0.00009716664,0.000072523304,0.00086658093,0.00007578221,0.000035320558,0.00027179442,0.000029593773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007313266,0.000024083734,0.0010485243,0.000040233157,0.000033468332,0.000004104889,0.0006605177,0.0000035449066,0.0000031415934,0.9978956,0.0001106527,0.0001030193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068836246,0.00010130478,0.00076452544,0.00003735482,0.000039530805,0.00012251058,0.0003895333,0.0001379202,0.000074059615,0.994785,0.0027848545,0.00007501669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000070796104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.435494e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19988574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025869504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013650421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31929535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083969644","doi":"10.1177/095169280201400304","title":"Single-Peakedness and Disconnected Coalitions","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Preference; Perception; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Economics; Political science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.045915860756792555,"score_gpt":0.22211010023722397,"score_spread":0.17619423948043142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083969644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9407826,0.0011651699,0.0079739755,0.0033510178,0.00075908116,0.00007183107,0.00008314441,0.000019387782,0.045793783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99854577,0.00002480461,0.0003274888,0.00024451612,0.00036542615,6.018847e-7,6.9765014e-7,0.00001499742,0.0004757094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998843,0.000060225484,0.00070332293,0.00010913636,0.000042749758,0.00024154756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896526,0.00029391807,0.00034753897,0.00014765043,0.000059070317,0.00018654061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000629602,0.00009879705,0.00034838534,0.00013529974,0.00007928398,0.00007177465,0.00014832639,0.00007553298,0.00072575966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008662183,0.00009099768,0.00010579552,0.00008925959,0.000435143,0.00011927719,0.000028554477,0.00019495665,0.00008292602],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049452524,0.00011410022,0.0010814159,0.00001949311,0.00003100554,0.000009769356,0.000445744,0.0000021063809,0.000025796715,0.9978879,0.00030218088,0.00007552459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043119266,0.00020092812,0.0005121511,0.000053838532,0.000017896118,0.00025245082,0.00019009251,0.0011017023,0.00010513443,0.99227756,0.0047241314,0.00013292511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000032992286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.9202955e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057763148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044836263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004149342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7946559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119711816","doi":"10.1177/0951629806064346","title":"Skating on Thin Ice","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Sketch; Dictator; Perspective (graphical); Dictator game; Mathematical economics; Economics; Game theory; Public good; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Political science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0195897838570992,"score_gpt":0.3400536788799533,"score_spread":0.3204638950228541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119711816","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7016958,0.00007765121,0.000058878104,0.003849279,0.00042660994,0.000044255004,0.0000033336075,0.000012051405,0.29383215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99691164,0.0000107940405,0.0012024618,0.00048052237,0.0010190287,4.8170654e-7,2.1474897e-7,0.000008653388,0.0003661823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892133,0.00011652726,0.00035222105,0.00006485737,0.0002675703,0.00027750313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992141,0.00032389845,0.00017519596,0.00007033705,0.000101941354,0.00011449442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062722946,0.00007413026,0.00016901245,0.000051449795,0.00026058286,0.000057513473,0.00019935207,0.00005951011,0.00014281581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003459611,0.00006228808,0.00010954985,0.000051536193,0.0008722595,0.000089628644,0.000034033576,0.00019925587,0.000033706387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007778773,0.00008068254,0.0010535538,0.0000012623451,0.0000059100753,0.00000962658,0.0011385069,0.00001831438,0.000119015865,0.99642724,0.0010759867,0.000062122024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025120832,0.00020684146,0.00056102435,0.000035747922,0.00002773968,0.000007632659,0.004125693,0.00003417994,0.0033803906,0.986467,0.004781503,0.00012106335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025686942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017510358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29521587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025948457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007437564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32138765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157444028","doi":"10.1177/0951629814562289","title":"Predicting majority rule: Evaluating the uncovered set and the strong point","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Generalization; Majority rule; Set (abstract data type); Decision rule; Point (geometry); Mathematical economics; Admissible decision rule; Computer science; Econometrics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Decision analysis; Weighted sum model; Influence diagram","score_opus":0.04084189433853768,"score_gpt":0.38232571404774446,"score_spread":0.34148381970920677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157444028","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.959458,0.000072230105,0.0013503539,0.027007176,0.00042741786,0.00016898935,0.000005026186,0.000010259707,0.01150054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99733114,0.0000042582756,0.00014910627,0.00058951316,0.0018334731,0.0000020620096,2.8643055e-7,0.000007022889,0.00008315945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963361,0.0020758086,0.00048568266,0.00007607057,0.00062661665,0.00039972688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99544334,0.00367797,0.0002631425,0.00013490775,0.00026320593,0.00021742628],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008445586,0.00008497139,0.00021771643,0.000021140562,0.0006446198,0.00015908736,0.00023725882,0.000074610514,0.000066501416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009539003,0.000041730298,0.000103102815,0.00008720264,0.0018796534,0.00011097823,0.00004986841,0.00036527874,0.000004087035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036849116,0.000009780037,0.004179348,0.000008115264,0.000018996283,4.2153175e-7,0.0021111951,0.000016872265,0.00001423189,0.99321145,0.00010345997,0.00028927854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064567826,0.00020146387,0.0021477446,0.000050388953,0.00011003025,0.000013169213,0.0012748213,0.0075036436,0.00003469325,0.98736113,0.0005925952,0.00006462452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000993692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000060156588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03787311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009177905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012899066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157458642","doi":"10.1177/0951692803154004","title":"Similarity of Options and the Measurement of Diversity","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Axiom; Similarity (geometry); Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Position (finance); Focus (optics); Computer science; Data science; Econometrics; Sociology; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Mathematics; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.053405751769022736,"score_gpt":0.23241106413992033,"score_spread":0.1790053123708976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157458642","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96125937,0.0012232623,0.004833709,0.000817976,0.00034342406,0.00009734861,0.00004187268,0.0000022603576,0.031380795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99950904,0.000045556415,0.00033598428,0.00005126505,0.000035274523,1.5081574e-7,5.1793762e-8,0.0000033827203,0.000019309222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990505,0.00011665696,0.0005929299,0.000052342366,0.00007873203,0.00010885195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890226,0.00024741353,0.0005128256,0.00012699174,0.000148819,0.0000616867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004361071,0.000054002794,0.00034388175,0.00006257903,0.000071603274,0.000007750262,0.00014397276,0.000044601074,0.00006842588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015313283,0.00003919626,0.00013576985,0.000054158976,0.0007982055,0.000037109563,0.000051686762,0.00013334754,0.0000018462696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036338406,0.000058095367,0.0054800157,0.000032087108,0.00005953627,4.7272962e-7,0.0004675737,0.000018842484,0.000010449812,0.9938034,0.000028284161,0.000004945801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007524436,0.00007973659,0.0017912409,0.000030164805,0.00003432866,0.000014157679,0.00019213109,0.00010191051,0.00052017067,0.9960893,0.00035400878,0.000040429153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011629855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.9238043e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03824967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003097726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001718886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29410213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2406909333","doi":"10.1177/0951629815586878","title":"Do parties converge to the electoral mean in all political systems?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Autocracy; Politics; Convergence (economics); Economics; Opposition (politics); Proportional representation; Political economy; Centripetal force; Political science; Economic system; Law; Macroeconomics; Physics; Democracy","score_opus":0.08731779137718267,"score_gpt":0.38917644410889757,"score_spread":0.3018586527317149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2406909333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9310485,0.00024058104,0.0004596222,0.052519847,0.0018467291,0.00035681424,0.000012407838,0.000023808503,0.013491696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962098,0.0000015348219,0.000051717918,0.0014420659,0.0020609016,0.000006348295,5.7874234e-7,0.000014519799,0.00021251942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958634,0.0012344143,0.000782911,0.00012239686,0.0009249814,0.0010719016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971169,0.00065332925,0.0001439057,0.00019124249,0.0005345144,0.0013600627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034793117,0.00013765357,0.00036493473,0.00012028057,0.00011630692,0.00019429125,0.00042062157,0.00014459972,0.00006861499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034070243,0.000089224835,0.00011617365,0.00026487873,0.00072212104,0.00015210753,0.000047746795,0.0003740784,0.00009424374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048122634,0.00006488922,0.0060148244,0.000009239201,0.000017495317,0.000015776715,0.0033809764,0.000051175633,0.000010241715,0.9860963,0.0042794626,0.000011492215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079642097,0.0010422065,0.0013194275,0.0001663214,0.00010099899,0.00004884346,0.008177933,0.0004975427,0.00025491303,0.8769243,0.11032388,0.0003472242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003179364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006364914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.109172024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006008937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050414173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48062682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621077348","doi":"10.1177/0951629817710559","title":"Path-dependency and coordination in multi-candidate elections with behavioral voters","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"American Political Science Association","keywords":"Voting; Cardinal voting systems; Approval voting; Path (computing); Anti-plurality voting; Disapproval voting; Coordination game; Dependency (UML); Economics; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence; Politics","score_opus":0.041765868773607884,"score_gpt":0.38829755999564836,"score_spread":0.34653169122204047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621077348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99078393,0.000018096709,0.0011901549,0.0060974313,0.00017465702,0.00009679115,0.0000041478456,0.0000057798125,0.0016289841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99915606,0.0000051724614,0.00035692198,0.00004714364,0.00019485204,0.0000018632905,3.6013125e-7,0.0000068027066,0.00023082964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889517,0.00017479785,0.00027896115,0.000075484386,0.00026549154,0.00031008982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915904,0.00009939739,0.00020624186,0.0001043878,0.00018884643,0.0002420723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064134836,0.00006993669,0.00016394329,0.00007239376,0.0004322422,0.00016428578,0.00014595175,0.000083540974,0.00003152234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053917215,0.0000534046,0.000036515496,0.00004689626,0.00085234054,0.00028772495,0.000017624503,0.00021453615,0.0000023031018],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019142251,0.00009875668,0.090961576,0.0000067331453,0.0000062374224,0.000016686785,0.0008099899,0.000001142626,0.000090061454,0.9077355,0.000033991775,0.00022013318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029298307,0.0014457131,0.32091197,0.00036119865,0.0001942689,0.000077873556,0.0014670413,0.00094170973,0.0006123609,0.66906935,0.0015512981,0.00043734568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003104393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019258377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23866618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013169194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013168922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46929342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004050731","doi":"10.1177/0951629819892339","title":"Subpoena power and informational lobbying","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Subpoena; Economics; Power (physics); Law and economics; Conflict of interest; Misrepresentation; Order (exchange); Public economics; Actuarial science; Business; Law; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.018470781344883908,"score_gpt":0.23173329667914053,"score_spread":0.2132625153342566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004050731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9010575,0.00006298204,0.000913372,0.018430622,0.0001719523,0.000047876165,0.0000037494713,0.000025080319,0.07928689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97942436,0.0000041869557,0.00014938948,0.019343141,0.0010640012,2.4029038e-7,0.000001068959,0.000007443929,0.0000061970068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990693,0.000006777719,0.00037958138,0.00005770464,0.00024836487,0.00023829016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937403,0.00007245711,0.00018456327,0.0000509523,0.00024252832,0.0000754612],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016809048,0.00009720582,0.00017275613,0.00007077628,0.00006624986,0.00024744333,0.00015257369,0.000046894824,0.00024631375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000492696,0.00007334312,0.00007043481,0.000114233306,0.00040027304,0.0009970015,0.00008087578,0.00020395359,0.000078739366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021356613,0.000011260941,0.0007674498,0.00004423994,0.000013101276,0.000016879554,0.000048924125,0.000012486118,0.00005870851,0.9979812,0.00093880063,0.00008559837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031632654,0.00005338623,0.0018042673,0.000032905285,0.000043845943,0.00003404328,0.0004877587,0.0019879,0.00008734065,0.9837304,0.011297161,0.00012470971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003585374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.6487266e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07928069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001153611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000438297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29908457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022227124","doi":"10.1177/0951629811429993","title":"Narrowing the field in elections: The Next-Two rule","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Apportionment; Computer science; Field (mathematics); Distribution (mathematics); Measure (data warehouse); Mathematical economics; Operations research; Econometrics; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Mathematics; Data mining; Law","score_opus":0.043614682354590796,"score_gpt":0.3882665453038016,"score_spread":0.3446518629492108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022227124","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8769708,0.0004655316,0.00045006917,0.10124332,0.0011022344,0.00014507993,8.1678866e-7,0.000009790251,0.019612312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99497885,0.000009294136,0.00004382727,0.0023566172,0.0024896942,0.0000028412642,8.0063806e-8,0.00000561142,0.00011318137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980193,0.000701448,0.000369403,0.000039351395,0.00034530048,0.0005252117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971864,0.0023080835,0.000104281564,0.00010507964,0.00010674057,0.00018938497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025725828,0.000062308536,0.00012485402,0.00004014369,0.0003386331,0.00008443867,0.00024510827,0.000066273176,0.00019615388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033615564,0.0000321857,0.000101143254,0.0002051698,0.0004947219,0.0002271459,0.000020283504,0.0004009838,0.000019692498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058286128,0.000038901653,0.007865125,0.0000021749825,0.000008275108,8.644877e-7,0.0030886997,0.0000050318777,0.000044147637,0.98780453,0.00093606435,0.00020032605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020437934,0.000100538295,0.005087542,0.000050137904,0.00004794648,0.000019356568,0.00305243,0.00009882209,0.00055567065,0.9617358,0.028949473,0.0000978937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011199993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015075333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.118008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012646802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000107133725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.402434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122702586","doi":"10.1177/0951629820984848","title":"Don’t hatch the messenger? On the desirability of restricting the political activity of bureaucrats","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Government (linguistics); Welfare; Economics; Control (management); Political economy; Public economics; Political science; Market economy; Law","score_opus":0.06374286432482551,"score_gpt":0.37117170253328097,"score_spread":0.30742883820845546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122702586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8891741,0.000055592594,0.00018838338,0.10089524,0.0002763379,0.00014372793,0.000009181106,0.0000047262693,0.009252713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985367,0.000007718591,0.000038107835,0.0006194612,0.0007303959,0.0000020989798,1.946869e-7,0.0000088438865,0.0000564937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949017,0.0028155018,0.0006891326,0.000109730914,0.0009244514,0.0005594537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988454,0.009750108,0.00039219126,0.00038770158,0.00078615994,0.00022984923],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035999508,0.000117718984,0.0003397764,0.000028164222,0.00041784227,0.00005686341,0.0004661246,0.00013230315,0.00016090041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012862473,0.000053093252,0.00028186332,0.0003287646,0.002853848,0.000073813746,0.000065106346,0.0005977374,0.000002583425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031723263,0.00015665303,0.0033413419,0.00002089911,0.00004139617,0.0000037422042,0.0009244414,0.000007522833,0.0011716568,0.9939864,0.00022488256,0.00008929656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015035812,0.00021843238,0.011501879,0.00010229553,0.00013310892,0.000013187255,0.003720298,0.00014507226,0.038218223,0.9450387,0.00067167945,0.00008677438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012834365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001020887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10936259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016444676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000582511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122800110","doi":"10.1177/0951629806061859","title":"Structural Reform Litigation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Agency (philosophy); Legislature; Interest group; Negotiation; Mandate; Statutory law; Law and economics; Bureaucracy; Economics; Political science; Public administration; Business; Law; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.011436166300214972,"score_gpt":0.2360932170294789,"score_spread":0.22465705072926395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122800110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81080365,0.000053980068,0.00062790525,0.0055592507,0.00049189193,0.000037612153,8.3443365e-7,0.000019043382,0.18240584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952758,9.918147e-7,0.00031703728,0.00078642846,0.0034333838,2.6678956e-7,0.0000019340805,0.0000072458106,0.00017693668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992475,0.000005152307,0.00031826997,0.000047293273,0.00022556953,0.00015621287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939454,0.000020955968,0.00021798971,0.000069251815,0.00028658015,0.000010689261],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014221887,0.00007252727,0.00013102076,0.00008544339,0.00009574727,0.00010508373,0.00011059334,0.000029173805,0.00013829052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006353361,0.000050455517,0.00008873773,0.000096088006,0.00022121382,0.00033897764,0.000035128276,0.00009124139,0.000030838408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008885844,0.000009135828,0.001628094,0.000015643427,0.0000069891266,0.000003104756,0.000005157281,0.00002873739,0.000035436376,0.99668145,0.0013574293,0.00021993877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022506049,0.000010399866,0.034569696,0.00002314965,0.000026944259,0.000013743449,0.000086625456,0.0017337347,0.00008122242,0.9558258,0.007334816,0.00006882676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028334496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000013250286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18447214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005579339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010057138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20575163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122878896","doi":"10.1177/0951629811411751","title":"‘While there’s a breath in my body’: The systemic effects of politically motivated retirement from the Supreme Court","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Supreme court; Suspect; Politics; Economic Justice; Law; Economics; Ideology; Political science; Roberts Court","score_opus":0.022697869826885143,"score_gpt":0.26689744134970783,"score_spread":0.24419957152282268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122878896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9338554,0.0010752962,0.00032926272,0.00848352,0.0005865762,0.00035205475,0.000027597289,0.000013275456,0.055276997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99865127,0.00015509845,0.000056766756,0.0005713102,0.00053032394,0.0000038098065,3.9003567e-7,0.000007245549,0.000023787414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757445,0.0006716753,0.00057259947,0.00009944147,0.0006728494,0.00040895655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99716604,0.0019630399,0.00022739437,0.0001690781,0.0003321412,0.00014233554],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011972294,0.00012477403,0.00032801385,0.00003683168,0.0002836165,0.00002583133,0.0005867654,0.00009278816,0.00014767365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017901227,0.000063172774,0.00016931705,0.00016008275,0.0033436334,0.00006072912,0.00009122382,0.00032012252,0.000008286179],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046425455,0.0001347511,0.009673058,0.000010003567,0.00009710149,0.000024479172,0.006378864,7.772795e-7,0.0001084153,0.9832195,0.0002709804,0.000035668938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042971832,0.00018354953,0.03992784,0.00047386196,0.00016072049,0.000011810409,0.0055263476,0.000013258576,0.0007737083,0.9519164,0.000482081,0.00010067682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005519197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001163618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06479585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000175835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034851386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392161940","doi":"10.1177/09516298241233491","title":"Justice, inclusion, and incentives","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Redistribution (election); Incentive; Economics; Distributive justice; Microeconomics; Politics; Economic Justice; Inequality; Public economics; Law and economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02524871525350309,"score_gpt":0.3794239509495444,"score_spread":0.3541752356960413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392161940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9237068,0.005950778,0.00021378153,0.014244975,0.0016195128,0.00007950047,0.000016690447,0.000028272305,0.05413965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976768,0.0006560729,0.000642281,0.00025694468,0.00056283793,3.9071668e-7,1.2407129e-7,0.0000072222533,0.00019734827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992307,0.00008374831,0.00023955718,0.00006886272,0.00018623438,0.00019088566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936086,0.00030551048,0.000047633497,0.000040969742,0.000076982775,0.00016801975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059879944,0.00006134998,0.00013616175,0.000069578935,0.00040568766,0.00007175323,0.00013174115,0.00004937561,0.000105295796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031490438,0.000048750695,0.00006060037,0.000062995154,0.0015458808,0.00016017922,0.00028684246,0.00016222082,0.000009915259],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050316103,0.00002305944,0.00019692835,0.000014167495,0.000015974067,0.000024443,0.011106715,1.6310956e-7,0.00015982847,0.9871878,0.0007987267,0.0004671819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009543196,0.000090099726,0.00012881985,0.00008058847,0.00011005256,0.000017357706,0.0065492215,0.00004149821,0.0006327646,0.9704549,0.021719046,0.00008026478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026124713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000033368324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07396994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014696164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010751341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5695862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}