{"meta":{"query_hash":"a3ad2e618c88","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics"},"cohort_total":18,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":18,"exported":18,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a3ad2e618c88","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Theoretical+Politics"},"results":[{"id":"W1972355832","doi":"10.1177/0951629803015002645","title":"Institutionalism as a Methodology","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":215,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Institutionalism; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); Axiom; Core (optical fiber); Economics; Class (philosophy); Positive economics; New institutionalism; Historical institutionalism; Neoclassical economics; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07010984092665977,"score_gpt":0.2939530061150081,"score_spread":0.2238431651883483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972355832","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003195313,0.004904405,0.8339553,0.01866526,0.00061242597,0.00030273251,0.0002746152,0.00022247393,0.13786753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3803334,0.008438658,0.5568572,0.008044038,0.0019768628,0.0030654639,0.00047766388,0.0003540651,0.040452633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98671573,0.009149931,0.0006134751,0.0014292331,0.0015581809,0.0005335019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874219,0.0076278825,0.0010282715,0.0023935498,0.0010430719,0.0004853842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015850753,0.00081103505,0.001098371,0.00436567,0.002962871,0.0068264604,0.0032349452,0.00270595,0.008598024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013758377,0.0006429925,0.00167422,0.0032457951,0.018108996,0.008446877,0.0064135375,0.005405059,0.0021253799],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.4679285e-7,0.0000045377974,0.00004281835,0.000020340509,0.000003210197,0.000007533622,0.00010208648,0.00028332867,0.000017304748,0.99693906,0.0005801688,0.001998724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004643608,0.000006311772,0.00003539856,0.00005479855,0.0000033652125,0.000026403544,0.000068579364,0.0010153198,0.000071207425,0.9628294,0.03588042,0.0000041303038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014330824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009970166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015850753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005510711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005652469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08382779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980384778","doi":"10.1177/0951629811398687","title":"Paradox lost: Explaining and modeling seemingly random individual behavior in social dilemmas","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Social dilemma; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Probabilistic logic; Function (biology); Psychology; Economics; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.09402872992152556,"score_gpt":0.353519939892713,"score_spread":0.25949120997118746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980384778","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4018036,0.0010921621,0.5578679,0.0068947547,0.00023629416,0.00017672215,0.0002650448,0.0002641888,0.03139941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9523594,0.00029784578,0.043274853,0.0002543209,0.00007379748,0.00015578665,0.000050755105,0.00004329584,0.0034900613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895847,0.00073046953,0.000034232533,0.00007713538,0.00011950938,0.00008011568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99344975,0.005083106,0.00053835165,0.0003569462,0.00021042563,0.00036142065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028439565,0.0004965741,0.0008207846,0.00071488315,0.0008785358,0.0016065821,0.0017708096,0.0017364648,0.0028809193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015810821,0.00039135973,0.0008439766,0.0005341664,0.0027661843,0.0024031,0.0019813776,0.0020170866,0.0002744594],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070887625,0.000114186485,0.0026720902,0.00007988107,0.000046861056,0.0003376233,0.0005916242,0.43987167,0.00036593553,0.54864144,0.001131383,0.0060764775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038277234,0.000018173563,0.00020675965,0.000008594061,0.0000071767176,0.000040040126,0.000053440086,0.7185681,0.000055507357,0.2802794,0.00071342627,0.000011096919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044041756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030294806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044041756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010193115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015102101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015040457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019223278","doi":"10.1177/0951629810375643","title":"Evaluating the Unfairness of Representation With the Nash Social Welfare Function","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Apportionment; Social welfare function; Index (typography); Representation (politics); Welfare; Function (biology); Nash equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Economics; Social Welfare; Public economics; Logarithm; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Political science; Computer science; Market economy; Law","score_opus":0.05754395389845783,"score_gpt":0.4239780069297339,"score_spread":0.3664340530312761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019223278","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32986936,0.00023008746,0.64659524,0.00064399786,0.00004769903,0.00016930723,0.00016059155,0.000092205024,0.022191549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93664235,0.00012896911,0.060527653,0.000038991657,0.000031930464,0.00016583112,0.00009499034,0.000042668842,0.002326557],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935222,0.0039433856,0.00022969986,0.00036277878,0.0014194589,0.0005224732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870907,0.008980065,0.0012505554,0.0009798476,0.0012536051,0.000445036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013223332,0.00092157285,0.0012452009,0.002802784,0.000829311,0.0025560984,0.0010900783,0.0009469236,0.0025258246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03012294,0.00026208436,0.0005792864,0.0021804536,0.0031358283,0.0032708193,0.002285164,0.0010145134,0.00014485106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028687916,0.00019454637,0.01231123,0.00010590071,0.00019287545,0.00014027196,0.00050427625,0.5652199,0.0018778711,0.36177224,0.0013309168,0.05606311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017371256,0.00016253002,0.004302559,0.000030540818,0.00003236779,0.00006209328,0.00043145326,0.8109188,0.0020024718,0.18090008,0.0010915272,0.000048195863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022243413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018157044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013223332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003665223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017515369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06993252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027958363","doi":"10.1177/0951629804043203","title":"Proximity, Directionality, and the Riddle of Relative Party Extremeness","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Ideal (ethics); Perception; Political science; Comparative politics; Positive economics; Sociology; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03920281316605294,"score_gpt":0.3443194872860485,"score_spread":0.30511667411999555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027958363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9805833,0.00040712045,0.007135398,0.00021329317,0.000010305428,0.00001877638,0.00013623659,0.0000112694315,0.011484368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99930155,0.0000454193,0.00046979665,0.0000099580175,0.0000065039326,0.0000052012115,0.000044191707,0.0000015477142,0.000115726354],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99425524,0.00344341,0.00039747564,0.00079323485,0.0007761146,0.0003345316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9711712,0.016272293,0.007799877,0.002870664,0.0012234867,0.0006624526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005385571,0.00015433982,0.00048977655,0.002730428,0.0009420849,0.0018385156,0.0003988664,0.0004963301,0.0027529295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033332508,0.00020786545,0.00030528373,0.0036291662,0.0023917968,0.0021730578,0.0031008583,0.0007473397,0.00028649028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006087951,0.000045234367,0.8915731,0.00023763737,0.00023160403,0.00024372399,0.010335422,0.002394739,0.0015856421,0.046050224,0.00034214137,0.046351697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039425104,0.00033389,0.9130693,0.00010963812,0.00011136711,0.00091390323,0.015383874,0.0031402356,0.0013593803,0.059672832,0.0058085164,0.000057663485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086853286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010872739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005385571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042686635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018042445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02848202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037312320","doi":"10.1177/095169280201400108","title":"The Schartz-Metterclume Method","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"American Political Science Association","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Phenomenon; Statistical analysis; Epistemology; Econometrics; Statistical hypothesis testing; Sociology; Mathematics; Computer science; Positive economics; Statistics; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01000125112375422,"score_gpt":0.29446271657801004,"score_spread":0.2844614654542558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037312320","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004238689,0.0013467398,0.9557375,0.0031398537,0.00034646926,0.00033592258,0.0007110461,0.00033960145,0.03380421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19001146,0.0013354725,0.778149,0.0019643302,0.00080726383,0.0020439245,0.00093367044,0.0004513945,0.024303505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9784405,0.012516979,0.00082496996,0.0027244282,0.004622455,0.0008706118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.969959,0.021487918,0.0014502304,0.00432991,0.002359741,0.0004132691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021378689,0.0011716953,0.0024715224,0.0060266284,0.0031001463,0.0054259268,0.004053283,0.0032446554,0.021572225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0810239,0.00091299764,0.0031130218,0.00540781,0.0075300517,0.006746661,0.005583962,0.0042303777,0.0059691924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005665337,0.00001821103,0.0007858314,0.00008618102,0.00005299897,0.00006380154,0.00025399192,0.0013376758,0.00012449491,0.9316295,0.0056705833,0.059920166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034016877,0.00003162791,0.0004987437,0.000099655226,0.000037677033,0.00014721698,0.00013221716,0.02026149,0.00033598824,0.94098467,0.037399314,0.000037479353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004045902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043148785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021572225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032412985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005555296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11306262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068727666","doi":"10.1177/0951629807080774","title":"Justice Preferences and the Arrow Problem","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Social choice theory; Social welfare function; Arrow; Normative; Economics; Condorcet method; Redistribution (election); Majority rule; Voting; Function (biology); Welfare; Microeconomics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.032161730264083276,"score_gpt":0.2570972878179075,"score_spread":0.22493555755382424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068727666","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16519146,0.0028095394,0.31498706,0.043958567,0.0006155985,0.00015364724,0.00032355692,0.00018220117,0.47177824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93776435,0.00074908853,0.034105133,0.0018477952,0.00035077814,0.00015842747,0.00006422364,0.00006529477,0.024894923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99466765,0.0029809987,0.00019823627,0.0007463287,0.00067419774,0.00073259586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954776,0.0024839216,0.00044184577,0.00067199825,0.0005688823,0.00035579602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071297106,0.00040646305,0.00073715945,0.0012788336,0.004855454,0.0047278036,0.00079094834,0.0038454176,0.009025793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011235727,0.00039672892,0.0011679066,0.0013105614,0.00851097,0.009120904,0.0034857672,0.0044368603,0.0007466581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050147,0.000004531022,0.00003928004,0.0000051697407,0.0000025912345,0.000009119798,0.00007490271,0.0003718997,0.00003057919,0.99749076,0.00038404972,0.0015820742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045906277,0.000002277431,0.00004071093,0.0000040285113,0.0000015432576,0.000008898367,0.000038385024,0.00065980246,0.00003351164,0.9969945,0.0022088003,0.0000029454081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027524277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016144218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009025793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030020373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019046738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037705958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083969644","doi":"10.1177/095169280201400304","title":"Single-Peakedness and Disconnected Coalitions","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Preference; Perception; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Economics; Political science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.045915860756792555,"score_gpt":0.22211010023722397,"score_spread":0.17619423948043142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083969644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5963891,0.0008513692,0.23159783,0.0030368175,0.00008861189,0.00015532809,0.0003261337,0.000104747014,0.16745003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98431855,0.00012926904,0.0103857815,0.00012737684,0.000028323182,0.00006726835,0.00011339185,0.00001573255,0.004814266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99609876,0.0016127366,0.00023202652,0.00076372793,0.0007663549,0.00052632636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98664665,0.0061830617,0.0026366839,0.0017305479,0.0010806177,0.0017224125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041955807,0.00033437196,0.0007107753,0.001742787,0.002225512,0.003741021,0.0009284875,0.0010335176,0.0077362917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015805954,0.0003689901,0.0007385084,0.0017030167,0.006762266,0.0048117293,0.004032273,0.0016250297,0.00049324025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041478797,0.000022553568,0.0025748115,0.000028282577,0.000023309829,0.000118152304,0.0012762061,0.0015834065,0.00021594581,0.9858213,0.00066355127,0.0076310365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024894918,0.000016069042,0.0012873933,0.00001734531,0.0000082999395,0.00017542836,0.0008399159,0.005713441,0.00014101321,0.9871612,0.004601953,0.0000128370175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012387265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001173858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077362917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001329838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005987007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025880516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119711816","doi":"10.1177/0951629806064346","title":"Skating on Thin Ice","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Sketch; Dictator; Perspective (graphical); Dictator game; Mathematical economics; Economics; Game theory; Public good; Positive economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Political science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0195897838570992,"score_gpt":0.3400536788799533,"score_spread":0.3204638950228541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119711816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15913634,0.0013210255,0.021446936,0.015955701,0.0020395706,0.00013571705,0.00087323243,0.00051275676,0.79857874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.780825,0.0018180668,0.010949436,0.0022044403,0.0003453098,0.00010179059,0.00092772,0.0005171937,0.20231093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989637,0.00035055465,0.000041973923,0.00018865881,0.0001943333,0.00026078653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982822,0.00041616015,0.00015144802,0.000388472,0.00037248703,0.00038926117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017578028,0.0007858936,0.0007258837,0.0010398276,0.0054458724,0.004562182,0.0009088655,0.0016847758,0.057880584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064244857,0.0003761284,0.00070870324,0.000722204,0.0036478823,0.007605718,0.0051288605,0.0022802132,0.018432176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014764644,0.0002840458,0.014849662,0.0006848416,0.00026551355,0.0011189465,0.013262336,0.007902195,0.0045699147,0.5916987,0.24665768,0.1172297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086892316,0.00035393535,0.00790645,0.0010744632,0.00009247566,0.00054915465,0.023806801,0.0095341485,0.0034354667,0.23798828,0.7150459,0.00012593828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074821985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015076068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057880584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012441438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014819263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19362986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157444028","doi":"10.1177/0951629814562289","title":"Predicting majority rule: Evaluating the uncovered set and the strong point","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Generalization; Majority rule; Set (abstract data type); Decision rule; Point (geometry); Mathematical economics; Admissible decision rule; Computer science; Econometrics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Decision analysis; Weighted sum model; Influence diagram","score_opus":0.04084189433853768,"score_gpt":0.38232571404774446,"score_spread":0.34148381970920677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157444028","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78097004,0.0006919759,0.20493646,0.001710383,0.00008224445,0.0002144811,0.00024554663,0.000104947765,0.011043969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788112,0.00012450709,0.02041223,0.00009116773,0.000037882925,0.0001192192,0.00015998146,0.000016457718,0.0002273203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9776358,0.015574263,0.0009300208,0.0020942758,0.0032986098,0.00046703007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7335484,0.23555942,0.012288266,0.012890495,0.004213036,0.0015003732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038456976,0.00093924336,0.0017924018,0.0020295205,0.0013889638,0.0040675197,0.0015691409,0.00222852,0.0032156222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20487057,0.00037899092,0.001086008,0.0012445581,0.0063760593,0.008429558,0.00459582,0.0031606173,0.0005280277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032694729,0.0008490017,0.15728918,0.0009803309,0.0009587724,0.0002731162,0.005583416,0.17198431,0.0023868328,0.45490083,0.0030694853,0.19845521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024460384,0.0013974647,0.031422984,0.00020839662,0.000120384975,0.00019327569,0.0026669924,0.39225793,0.0025393027,0.5669224,0.0018761271,0.00015006546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005989056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005757825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038456976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012102408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011575839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20338237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157458642","doi":"10.1177/0951692803154004","title":"Similarity of Options and the Measurement of Diversity","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Axiom; Similarity (geometry); Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Position (finance); Focus (optics); Computer science; Data science; Econometrics; Sociology; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Mathematics; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.053405751769022736,"score_gpt":0.23241106413992033,"score_spread":0.1790053123708976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157458642","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54741085,0.0031066553,0.39796653,0.0032762915,0.00014901397,0.00011631136,0.00035636176,0.000079896716,0.047538117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821164,0.00022831163,0.01664333,0.00008807882,0.0000827005,0.00005638184,0.000102807564,0.000011754341,0.00067021314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98046,0.011613428,0.0011164675,0.0020250538,0.0040284526,0.0007565709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.939282,0.043525245,0.00688808,0.005662706,0.002833186,0.0018086863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009524928,0.00039289106,0.0011972721,0.004965118,0.0015834987,0.004526588,0.0013903573,0.0017731418,0.0029660533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07851771,0.00037503545,0.00072701566,0.0036049508,0.008554807,0.010627544,0.0057719024,0.0017364316,0.0002561202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012724045,0.00003981375,0.010299461,0.00010207563,0.0001055465,0.0000895367,0.0011379282,0.010368437,0.0012546928,0.94325167,0.00036706266,0.03285649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012714419,0.00006293035,0.0045826617,0.000047565103,0.000012255308,0.00017278086,0.00042776315,0.013030608,0.00045441923,0.97930497,0.0018651453,0.000026146005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047661038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030636223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009524928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001799884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005768819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050373256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2406909333","doi":"10.1177/0951629815586878","title":"Do parties converge to the electoral mean in all political systems?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Autocracy; Politics; Convergence (economics); Economics; Opposition (politics); Proportional representation; Political economy; Centripetal force; Political science; Economic system; Law; Macroeconomics; Physics; Democracy","score_opus":0.08731779137718267,"score_gpt":0.38917644410889757,"score_spread":0.3018586527317149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2406909333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89736456,0.0005035551,0.04807895,0.002104473,0.000050318093,0.00006186339,0.00029813126,0.00018554126,0.05135268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961436,0.00014772576,0.002163535,0.000117886375,0.000026962836,0.000040931027,0.00014637124,0.000027356009,0.0011856336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99652666,0.0014391323,0.00014172008,0.0008440993,0.0005092872,0.0005391473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881037,0.00612632,0.0018666545,0.0018642332,0.0012818486,0.0007573037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045509893,0.00025421043,0.0011526028,0.0027634783,0.0018199207,0.003634301,0.0010248394,0.0013522254,0.008368886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035775553,0.00039846863,0.0008139392,0.00196281,0.0033364678,0.00493967,0.0029407328,0.0016173557,0.0011195121],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005364445,0.00015138558,0.18643515,0.00025915107,0.00039243224,0.00026489972,0.0061743883,0.014443028,0.0012047772,0.6989817,0.0029771281,0.08817955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013621962,0.00022033478,0.1854579,0.00015825687,0.00011833408,0.0005480852,0.0060614757,0.038271464,0.00146668,0.7556983,0.011768792,0.00009411501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001897433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016068675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008368886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011085443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047768056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027996719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621077348","doi":"10.1177/0951629817710559","title":"Path-dependency and coordination in multi-candidate elections with behavioral voters","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","funders":"American Political Science Association","keywords":"Voting; Cardinal voting systems; Approval voting; Path (computing); Anti-plurality voting; Disapproval voting; Coordination game; Dependency (UML); Economics; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence; Politics","score_opus":0.041765868773607884,"score_gpt":0.38829755999564836,"score_spread":0.34653169122204047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621077348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7883608,0.00018875049,0.189689,0.0019985035,0.000034132972,0.00013225642,0.00032911357,0.000105836014,0.019161642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98870474,0.00008632702,0.006656743,0.000057823396,0.000019767058,0.000074430965,0.00009690544,0.000015073061,0.004288213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804723,0.0010366114,0.000050913604,0.00031718836,0.00013602374,0.00041201926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99224937,0.0041984976,0.0019692597,0.00054961565,0.00030762682,0.0007256021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027593449,0.00044627918,0.0011649716,0.0006414039,0.0010952262,0.0017585335,0.001167479,0.0011975168,0.007747548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009601763,0.0004490915,0.0007741322,0.00082142145,0.0015009494,0.0017257566,0.0014855617,0.0012573986,0.0007532648],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055095897,0.00028805208,0.015976379,0.0001076413,0.00013909112,0.0009999257,0.0010090107,0.3022709,0.0027242904,0.660253,0.0019465289,0.01373424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021204368,0.00023701905,0.0058421143,0.000017021452,0.00005111905,0.00013082732,0.00037827942,0.6291039,0.00047986265,0.3612672,0.0022359102,0.000044606568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034975952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037635986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007747548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00137823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008873816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025918186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004050731","doi":"10.1177/0951629819892339","title":"Subpoena power and informational lobbying","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Subpoena; Economics; Power (physics); Law and economics; Conflict of interest; Misrepresentation; Order (exchange); Public economics; Actuarial science; Business; Law; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.018470781344883908,"score_gpt":0.23173329667914053,"score_spread":0.2132625153342566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004050731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6033257,0.0020258548,0.052108876,0.0073698782,0.00009051852,0.00012779629,0.00010616327,0.0000818312,0.33476332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962825,0.00021433613,0.0006630266,0.0001417589,0.000032610857,0.000021507194,0.000009741185,0.000008131058,0.0026263006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938215,0.0029683707,0.00022192848,0.00055831514,0.00097575085,0.001454187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95310587,0.033090714,0.006727202,0.0033226341,0.001578839,0.0021748005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00807132,0.000481081,0.0006952818,0.0017924509,0.0017125052,0.0057619973,0.0008537715,0.0018002738,0.01525478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030701613,0.000364188,0.0006251146,0.001332562,0.007687851,0.007390606,0.005754141,0.0025318773,0.0010204682],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022783685,0.00014609618,0.012332146,0.00016031394,0.00007177858,0.00039315573,0.002041578,0.010809743,0.001446504,0.9497301,0.00079721666,0.021843502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014591299,0.00025120494,0.013683844,0.00017312531,0.00008815112,0.00029068784,0.0025913185,0.020018296,0.0026060285,0.9418804,0.018222343,0.000048833448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015970865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014743719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01525478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020825705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021733514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051032305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022227124","doi":"10.1177/0951629811429993","title":"Narrowing the field in elections: The Next-Two rule","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Apportionment; Computer science; Field (mathematics); Distribution (mathematics); Measure (data warehouse); Mathematical economics; Operations research; Econometrics; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Mathematics; Data mining; Law","score_opus":0.043614682354590796,"score_gpt":0.3882665453038016,"score_spread":0.3446518629492108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022227124","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43493676,0.001954086,0.47794846,0.0065949014,0.00053947786,0.00057721365,0.00030310286,0.00055822084,0.076587886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92726505,0.00024303157,0.065105565,0.00088834454,0.00028997057,0.00026823828,0.00015657648,0.00011748261,0.0056657786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98549426,0.006906663,0.0005720181,0.002575196,0.0033495247,0.0011023929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9569148,0.028333286,0.0043170163,0.004908415,0.0028814245,0.0026451703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016792353,0.0005008777,0.0025112256,0.0032129837,0.004555582,0.004211684,0.0021459882,0.0027871947,0.007626924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06409789,0.0004718146,0.001178503,0.0019535301,0.0058154366,0.0058953986,0.0034624676,0.00484929,0.0013193111],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009719912,0.00060935685,0.05863956,0.00027323843,0.00017357693,0.00061621645,0.0023402607,0.031936537,0.0027885528,0.63795143,0.011736024,0.25196317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023438662,0.0007182635,0.02333459,0.00011179032,0.000052740084,0.0007053208,0.0010214157,0.09358829,0.002023805,0.85818803,0.019882433,0.00013891982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019319087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028426908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016792353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001389274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013330532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08880752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122702586","doi":"10.1177/0951629820984848","title":"Don’t hatch the messenger? On the desirability of restricting the political activity of bureaucrats","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Government (linguistics); Welfare; Economics; Control (management); Political economy; Public economics; Political science; Market economy; Law","score_opus":0.06374286432482551,"score_gpt":0.37117170253328097,"score_spread":0.30742883820845546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122702586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45685884,0.0019898757,0.025962256,0.10914559,0.00037823844,0.00013609424,0.0002780333,0.00006849131,0.40518257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873028,0.0006149932,0.0016135789,0.0031605389,0.00028618393,0.000054513992,0.000026917267,0.000028388222,0.0069121816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99244505,0.0048440215,0.000166411,0.0007242372,0.0008589718,0.0009613397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9513481,0.03856483,0.0040220693,0.0022236835,0.0026411468,0.001200096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01613793,0.00043690708,0.00113861,0.0010291645,0.002241271,0.004422424,0.0011238074,0.0039179837,0.017612481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04830296,0.0003424222,0.00080249645,0.000874431,0.008624007,0.004924873,0.0017755926,0.0030733002,0.0013079809],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006047725,0.0002895149,0.009978971,0.00026271612,0.00018415203,0.0002186822,0.001315165,0.0041862936,0.0013839605,0.9242085,0.007838577,0.049528662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027074866,0.0003105342,0.015553707,0.00022417914,0.00024351479,0.00024280541,0.0026852281,0.011947439,0.0010132438,0.951405,0.016055379,0.000048156122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002446443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002543278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017612481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024064323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015687317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08534652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122800110","doi":"10.1177/0951629806061859","title":"Structural Reform Litigation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Agency (philosophy); Legislature; Interest group; Negotiation; Mandate; Statutory law; Law and economics; Bureaucracy; Economics; Political science; Public administration; Business; Law; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.011436166300214972,"score_gpt":0.2360932170294789,"score_spread":0.22465705072926395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122800110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07204286,0.001249781,0.1493736,0.03598454,0.0007469109,0.0007962762,0.00032599297,0.0003807382,0.7390993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90522856,0.000558294,0.01911555,0.011013434,0.0005982997,0.000663499,0.00017457355,0.00006757293,0.06258037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96573347,0.011172754,0.0016331288,0.004348571,0.012071581,0.0050404207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96733487,0.016370466,0.0042921533,0.005870484,0.0047533824,0.0013785774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02037306,0.00061131263,0.0007728747,0.002233681,0.0066777407,0.0058115865,0.0027320748,0.008211744,0.019015314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05088036,0.0005564192,0.0014167898,0.002849682,0.0071969666,0.0055887587,0.008431885,0.006153864,0.002641977],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014392599,0.00003598395,0.00041941053,0.000027638967,0.000012745349,0.00008069957,0.0007599992,0.00046812548,0.00026965968,0.9879941,0.0041852393,0.0057320143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016304203,0.00026262167,0.0022611904,0.0002378813,0.000092812916,0.0006878703,0.0015318968,0.009550562,0.0029724431,0.7885237,0.19365613,0.000059880247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004069813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004421956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02037306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073584933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008617524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107744336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122878896","doi":"10.1177/0951629811411751","title":"‘While there’s a breath in my body’: The systemic effects of politically motivated retirement from the Supreme Court","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Supreme court; Suspect; Politics; Economic Justice; Law; Economics; Ideology; Political science; Roberts Court","score_opus":0.022697869826885143,"score_gpt":0.26689744134970783,"score_spread":0.24419957152282268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122878896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97207934,0.0008481464,0.0006869003,0.012153697,0.00005015023,0.000014101048,0.00018271821,0.000023852332,0.013961097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981673,0.00015360932,0.000075929514,0.00059637654,0.000051541276,0.000003917333,0.00003858427,0.000007231746,0.000905572],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985453,0.00086709403,0.00002784814,0.00017544326,0.00010946684,0.00027487698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98575926,0.006828896,0.003975894,0.0009088962,0.0007032249,0.0018238692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029464823,0.00013726404,0.0003700801,0.00045829412,0.0015057792,0.0019062263,0.00045411807,0.0011360688,0.011296522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016122371,0.00019531773,0.0004027946,0.00073188025,0.0026615518,0.00145758,0.00212513,0.0022524751,0.00065271696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001774297,0.0019054788,0.81125283,0.00014174076,0.00063276326,0.001087398,0.009030431,0.0063969884,0.0033627048,0.07339105,0.015873617,0.07515076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014961865,0.00056877045,0.94388604,0.00006120185,0.00023875725,0.00011741451,0.005963114,0.0020437117,0.0007236158,0.037422523,0.008778954,0.00004626768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012248253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021718793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012248253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015544639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011380352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037790596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392161940","doi":"10.1177/09516298241233491","title":"Justice, inclusion, and incentives","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical Politics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Redistribution (election); Incentive; Economics; Distributive justice; Microeconomics; Politics; Economic Justice; Inequality; Public economics; Law and economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02524871525350309,"score_gpt":0.3794239509495444,"score_spread":0.3541752356960413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392161940","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35548106,0.0016617799,0.13298821,0.029207148,0.00027745662,0.00018016271,0.00016394141,0.000099906574,0.47994033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98607486,0.00025056786,0.0052181114,0.00057378045,0.00010502738,0.00007099023,0.000016095937,0.000025421718,0.0076651396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.991454,0.004258342,0.00030471693,0.0009811701,0.001457417,0.0015443724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98562664,0.007028374,0.0024668018,0.0022621904,0.0013242982,0.0012916897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076455195,0.00038583786,0.00097099587,0.0012138197,0.004212755,0.006964666,0.0010815493,0.0028566876,0.0063544326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020401848,0.00037417267,0.000732131,0.0010340377,0.013763994,0.007396874,0.0053894143,0.0024677718,0.0004957672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019204459,0.000035474823,0.00078786985,0.000020907702,0.000008708748,0.000032919674,0.0003765532,0.0015085947,0.00018894763,0.9923975,0.00042034313,0.0042029326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010797334,0.000017171587,0.0008425139,0.000020500978,0.000007277803,0.000025398685,0.0002048008,0.0020934145,0.00016953681,0.99232715,0.0042742877,0.000007126482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028059126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021946942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076455195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038920157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030823175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040433824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}