{"meta":{"query_hash":"134cb3676b8c","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology"},"cohort_total":13,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":13,"exported":13,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/134cb3676b8c","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Theoretical+and+Philosophical+Psychology"},"results":[{"id":"W1982056669","doi":"10.1037/a0023427","title":"On the ambiguity of concept use in commentaries.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07385694327672293,"score_gpt":0.33402903704526504,"score_spread":0.2601720937685421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982056669","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08309603,0.008332528,0.019342896,0.64324105,0.015403443,0.00021149186,0.0014565291,0.00032473644,0.22859138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8697114,0.002311009,0.0037227592,0.08918332,0.006818585,0.0002744395,0.0003922618,0.00052171206,0.027064538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.959349,0.027312772,0.0027186319,0.002461065,0.006493415,0.0016650503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4395129,0.5080297,0.011286726,0.008260711,0.031193877,0.0017161026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0359867,0.00057144393,0.00045547064,0.0038979023,0.010044229,0.006922783,0.002829205,0.010166965,0.009972425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29195133,0.00062616554,0.00041940936,0.0029739253,0.011692514,0.014391349,0.0062504904,0.012027495,0.0017058209],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024142464,0.000028387072,0.0029688238,0.00073034933,0.00003909306,0.001821342,0.3180191,0.00016790841,0.0019397128,0.3756193,0.28307173,0.015352776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041272717,0.000039679056,0.007157368,0.0030205254,0.00004069749,0.0011032114,0.15577285,0.0011732397,0.0041630394,0.088424444,0.73885626,0.00020741107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005836966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061965804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0359867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048939604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029054582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19031817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987547682","doi":"10.1037/a0022077","title":"On the ambiguity of concept use in psychology: Is the concept “concept” a useful concept?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07386244450551185,"score_gpt":0.3393515116932449,"score_spread":0.265489067187733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987547682","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24856952,0.03917532,0.30955163,0.21229696,0.0032463877,0.00018305323,0.00027383587,0.00018032493,0.18652305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97015285,0.0038131783,0.019668061,0.004122081,0.0008383358,0.00012412867,0.00006430303,0.00008073095,0.0011363293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98626906,0.008278363,0.00084942795,0.0011138706,0.0030439757,0.0004453306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93705726,0.050277572,0.003648958,0.0037779124,0.0041341963,0.0011039678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02339465,0.0006332473,0.0013491671,0.0044172728,0.0037856195,0.010412441,0.0034863225,0.006464518,0.0046581994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07520026,0.00084186747,0.0010159783,0.0040137097,0.053893685,0.037078395,0.007180148,0.0075108614,0.00050845253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080781,0.000029878514,0.0011684559,0.00016572025,0.000020986905,0.00015637347,0.016088488,0.00028817408,0.00034332337,0.96034735,0.0012954614,0.020014968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002108573,0.000019475687,0.00074262376,0.00020223479,0.0000190118,0.00023541268,0.00456014,0.0008199989,0.00024507588,0.987133,0.005970338,0.000031452993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015867264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007974842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02339465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002603854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028396836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12372416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012656741","doi":"10.1037/h0091257","title":"Analogy and Metaphor Running Amok: An Examination of the Use of Explanatory Devices in Neuroscience.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Metaphor; Psychology; Explanatory model; Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06144601990434982,"score_gpt":0.34237851266103664,"score_spread":0.2809324927566868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012656741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5164547,0.019871652,0.09183948,0.01557818,0.00033920622,0.00013879807,0.00015249527,0.00021123528,0.3554142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98346,0.0021918095,0.011888131,0.0003145643,0.000034868986,0.00005607445,0.00003138839,0.000039141043,0.0019839844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982445,0.0011536457,0.000073340074,0.0001068864,0.00033119714,0.000090481495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852695,0.012421828,0.0007945039,0.00092195673,0.00044945846,0.00014277583],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029854209,0.00028739803,0.0002810886,0.0022878086,0.0012929486,0.0038183066,0.00093651743,0.0019960022,0.0042954255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026937073,0.00028000213,0.00035288036,0.0016474059,0.009543236,0.011929897,0.0028076756,0.0023100257,0.0002774333],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103722996,0.000045612036,0.003184259,0.00024255288,0.000018217002,0.00044766368,0.030006148,0.0002884667,0.0016813354,0.9122187,0.0010042638,0.050759092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030897507,0.00007536622,0.009867134,0.0005684783,0.00005353549,0.0022244889,0.027233927,0.0045023677,0.0017684706,0.9146768,0.038955446,0.000043112093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007285689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00097558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99870706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006917198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011684396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015788615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062186509","doi":"10.1037/a0029990","title":"Concepts in Aristotle and Aquinas: Implications for current theoretical approaches.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Current (fluid); Philosophy; Psychology; Physics","score_opus":0.11531791967749072,"score_gpt":0.3640962891739194,"score_spread":0.24877836949642868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062186509","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03538324,0.07359558,0.09438505,0.09329161,0.0039965087,0.00009460949,0.00021937449,0.00016811703,0.69886595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.918356,0.015619063,0.03548241,0.0073463456,0.0019249187,0.00025734247,0.00013004421,0.0001154693,0.020768372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759173,0.0013429598,0.00011822393,0.00024176335,0.00054891326,0.00015645867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99596345,0.0027020227,0.0002611277,0.00033397658,0.0005267671,0.00021261141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004751534,0.0005854406,0.00088136503,0.0026278694,0.004593262,0.0063479473,0.0018326106,0.0036940586,0.0057110195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009867157,0.00030319358,0.00054325524,0.0031878643,0.03415374,0.020722618,0.0034915097,0.0051114736,0.00090842525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034878842,0.0000036314668,0.000016245982,0.000011793982,8.1985837e-7,0.000008136974,0.0008017442,0.000022948512,0.0000053013687,0.9971234,0.00062040373,0.0013820119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047223793,0.0000030509748,0.00005994603,0.000038983973,0.0000011753496,0.000021065625,0.00057928014,0.00010631339,0.000014215595,0.99066836,0.008499996,0.000002857188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024015903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029244118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063479473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042516626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033624507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030848086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084920254","doi":"10.1037/h0091284","title":"There are no \"specific correct\" usages of concepts, only correct usages: Linguistic rules and the bounds of sense.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Sense (electronics); Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02707376872999943,"score_gpt":0.34273762586267353,"score_spread":0.3156638571326741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084920254","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.292295,0.009696396,0.43721932,0.031326983,0.0011192594,0.00010857833,0.0008582133,0.00078791875,0.22658828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9481434,0.00091160956,0.047170427,0.0012334237,0.00017189856,0.000085407344,0.00022392404,0.00022274537,0.001837116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868515,0.0053580366,0.0016511156,0.0025870749,0.002971066,0.0005812622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9661533,0.018486502,0.0028324714,0.0077490495,0.003983057,0.00079551956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007626932,0.0005366333,0.0012916125,0.002395013,0.002202414,0.007082643,0.0018076822,0.0028870555,0.002761127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047194093,0.0012514878,0.00078844617,0.001441457,0.023013001,0.028233204,0.004746968,0.004364207,0.00071769115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009588553,0.000030174911,0.0020675468,0.00021211186,0.00006614161,0.00014776588,0.006060233,0.00034813522,0.002097807,0.9590411,0.0023503297,0.027482836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001508553,0.000011747771,0.0010409943,0.00008597325,0.00003526623,0.0003186319,0.0010622452,0.0007881555,0.00095413346,0.98929054,0.006365447,0.000031705647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070992747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089286733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007626932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008304592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011973816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040335596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153048194","doi":"10.1037/teo0000018","title":"The historical boundedness of psychological knowledge and the ethics of shared understandings.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychological science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12423458155784396,"score_gpt":0.42815327218275645,"score_spread":0.3039186906249125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153048194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047046494,0.027717542,0.08593994,0.20949988,0.0010989708,0.00008989598,0.0001469958,0.00010178508,0.62835854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97573143,0.0025232977,0.008528573,0.004839243,0.00048108445,0.00014913497,0.000047044978,0.000056908033,0.007643265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9708438,0.02112169,0.0008358009,0.002598478,0.0034230256,0.0011771795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9655465,0.023007024,0.0026029146,0.0049225534,0.0025412522,0.0013797443],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025630035,0.0005016766,0.00068503973,0.0027402355,0.00990661,0.012808383,0.0018546846,0.009092123,0.0039944747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031020932,0.0007534526,0.0007047266,0.0015793609,0.15169258,0.019011933,0.010296087,0.008837743,0.00066590507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035974058,0.0000036930064,0.00006694097,0.000011985236,0.000004109491,0.000023857092,0.004337312,0.000050495975,0.000018677225,0.99371403,0.0005589947,0.0012063168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050322474,0.0000039642036,0.000115712,0.000051654,0.0000029148532,0.00003622188,0.0010966907,0.000104273015,0.00003943941,0.9884724,0.010066798,0.0000048620304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045137247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036397872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9900934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008851224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066466355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13554627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158807583","doi":"10.1037/a0033033","title":"Social justice and psychology: What is, and what should be.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Social justice; Psychology; Social psychology; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Sociology; Criminology; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06645792874642947,"score_gpt":0.4183957804214494,"score_spread":0.35193785167501995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158807583","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004549704,0.14746156,0.00280877,0.81632334,0.004807776,0.000022217353,0.00004494625,0.00003812284,0.023943493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51644003,0.18092582,0.0059525263,0.26862872,0.018716574,0.00021514801,0.00014264164,0.00011021346,0.008868303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907504,0.0060791364,0.00024698686,0.0007710924,0.0013628409,0.0007896076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840588,0.009161193,0.0011255341,0.0010527433,0.0020614343,0.0025402452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013212965,0.00060853537,0.0012551341,0.0022429256,0.006268521,0.015321892,0.0016003174,0.010297915,0.0045840596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01881474,0.00038187558,0.0005380951,0.0025576125,0.069891095,0.025880633,0.0058940826,0.0125075495,0.0010137883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054405104,0.00013079988,0.0030785706,0.00095900206,0.000055810182,0.00014456178,0.016740326,0.00014951127,0.00021592954,0.7703055,0.068710215,0.13945533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001218184,0.000029906498,0.002362052,0.0020415904,0.000017404971,0.00015651737,0.019996477,0.00015749106,0.000080126956,0.86568123,0.10942713,0.0000378663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068428866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007629751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015321892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005624579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012247071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069877684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519069346","doi":"10.1037/teo0000048","title":"Quantification in psychology: Critical analysis of an unreflective practice.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Cognitive Abilities and Testing","field":"Psychology","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07144827821364612,"score_gpt":0.4601562174715627,"score_spread":0.3887079392579166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519069346","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046570547,0.027404094,0.7385129,0.086442515,0.0032084459,0.00044175683,0.00014670602,0.00036397195,0.09690916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8364259,0.0037419833,0.14645436,0.0037433575,0.0014728017,0.0005505463,0.00004839928,0.00022059972,0.0073421295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9814338,0.014445276,0.0006835889,0.000908008,0.0022615714,0.0002677555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85404104,0.124379925,0.0026902885,0.008518552,0.009496835,0.0008734017],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029572627,0.0006254605,0.0006109914,0.0031936928,0.002552585,0.004358184,0.0020262424,0.0017961243,0.0033298193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.106504716,0.0004001889,0.0005842644,0.0015099476,0.039822064,0.010997891,0.0040834364,0.0043257233,0.0003274029],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029243889,0.000021489517,0.00018359034,0.00015563778,0.000012172324,0.00006158203,0.0060684183,0.0002537333,0.00021853976,0.9688271,0.0042108167,0.019957747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070675983,0.000008470271,0.00019657015,0.00014150047,0.0000046173172,0.000039793347,0.0010690524,0.0013315254,0.00029960793,0.9872356,0.009657468,0.000008800954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010624663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013261801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9704274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029494015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028084768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15639687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529841034","doi":"10.1037/teo0000025","title":"Constructing psychological objects: The rhetoric of constructs.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Cognitive and psychological constructs research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rhetoric; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.10990918706485021,"score_gpt":0.4245541460557932,"score_spread":0.314644958990943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529841034","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016188558,0.03938867,0.5469562,0.11903628,0.0037004473,0.00022419338,0.0004299046,0.0005571083,0.2735187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7136367,0.010522597,0.24710351,0.010845383,0.0023533597,0.00086390506,0.00037942958,0.00068640005,0.013608704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907259,0.0071466086,0.0004425244,0.0006976505,0.0008273329,0.00016004032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9738951,0.020994203,0.0008765008,0.0025151693,0.0012456756,0.00047335174],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013543377,0.0008721282,0.0008671737,0.004383369,0.004174054,0.008114886,0.0022016985,0.004217194,0.004558281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03566025,0.0010367067,0.0009250468,0.0027197136,0.062727645,0.019775432,0.0049793394,0.008862731,0.0010748919],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005768871,0.0000028077022,0.00003968744,0.00003561663,0.0000027774217,0.000019068337,0.0016697184,0.000032900974,0.000031181433,0.9954764,0.0009485024,0.0017354701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012570553,0.000005453516,0.000069873146,0.00010234187,0.0000062774493,0.000077152974,0.0007068081,0.0002587471,0.0001009755,0.9718929,0.02676114,0.0000057430575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018567408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017060922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99582595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028576239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025419341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07162511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890366377","doi":"10.1037/teo0000097","title":"What is social justice? Implications for psychology.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Social justice; Psychology; Social psychology; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Sociology; Criminology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.15206380488427257,"score_gpt":0.54872642740767,"score_spread":0.3966626225233974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890366377","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010683956,0.06472249,0.0045869444,0.8099401,0.0030206451,0.00003399751,0.000060204668,0.000034228193,0.106917344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8652529,0.035935484,0.0030907285,0.08183924,0.004988164,0.00013625986,0.00004883394,0.000047921567,0.008660486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99466056,0.003297397,0.00015919567,0.00045977387,0.0008259038,0.00059721473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97881764,0.016022902,0.0008595258,0.000686787,0.0014475803,0.0021656463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009455149,0.00036488092,0.0008602402,0.0017631458,0.0065304236,0.009133047,0.0014936627,0.006537175,0.009678768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02525491,0.00020975624,0.0004584748,0.0014420637,0.056381736,0.011044872,0.0037621614,0.0067111542,0.0005302285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015189752,0.00006272287,0.0007373822,0.00011091159,0.000013772028,0.00009154044,0.0034391168,0.00011396575,0.000040650233,0.95811236,0.01928919,0.017973235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074993955,0.000013247531,0.001012251,0.00028679677,0.000004876712,0.000057048175,0.0052911453,0.00010821641,0.000032836833,0.9736502,0.019528994,0.000006862773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063253245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008307819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009678768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005240942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008675744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050004184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003425151","doi":"10.1037/teo0000134","title":"Doing science, doing gender: Using history in the present.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Diverse Educational Innovations Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11363535479570377,"score_gpt":0.3357960371105712,"score_spread":0.22216068231486744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003425151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059849225,0.18158427,0.020838244,0.13338768,0.0038277844,0.00004671789,0.00022980837,0.000085037056,0.60015124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9088934,0.051028132,0.006008684,0.008690525,0.0013463421,0.000056560006,0.00008573698,0.0000889197,0.02380172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985512,0.001097693,0.000037794747,0.00012338503,0.00010461591,0.000085190215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939323,0.0047987024,0.00025416093,0.0003588729,0.0002562997,0.00039961698],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038674085,0.0003734964,0.00025393986,0.0021343476,0.0037836796,0.0064312764,0.0007428196,0.0018301264,0.0048338557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067707836,0.00021598279,0.00015212917,0.0021618754,0.028794987,0.014330199,0.003315144,0.0029743367,0.00043934784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003855225,0.000032372674,0.0021389064,0.00023764506,0.000010940943,0.00018428154,0.08527663,0.00008476938,0.00019671653,0.8442507,0.008832065,0.058716428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011655087,0.000059221828,0.0030461682,0.0014506977,0.000025161715,0.00041231932,0.07379993,0.0001945698,0.00039637956,0.48158678,0.4389891,0.000027955713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032459572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008753776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020083848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022268423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020453036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003770492","doi":"10.1037/teo0000140","title":"Possibility for women in psychology and interdisciplinary sciences: Introduction to the special issue.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03813592727804413,"score_gpt":0.4040453681359281,"score_spread":0.365909440857884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003770492","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015961287,0.44528466,0.005441893,0.24448518,0.21368839,0.00006390675,0.00021138432,0.00009464589,0.08913389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0309809,0.24235703,0.004972675,0.072998464,0.53430796,0.00023027913,0.00029596663,0.00026607685,0.11359067],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992471,0.00028581911,0.000054508502,0.00013625197,0.0001882904,0.00008795327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99663997,0.0024648954,0.00011247577,0.000113101465,0.00033176746,0.0003377507],"candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020555132,0.0009027666,0.00096397847,0.0017169081,0.0026109396,0.0038044762,0.0014997941,0.0049764435,0.018061161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045744632,0.0004026779,0.0009586338,0.0010583295,0.0051921285,0.0075875316,0.003555655,0.008263822,0.003459152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033385833,0.000051172203,0.00056430226,0.00047631172,0.00001918387,0.00039500056,0.0007107092,0.00013714534,0.00020086918,0.2274044,0.71279997,0.057207473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005701549,0.000026525477,0.0009245613,0.00049450085,0.00001049793,0.0006622001,0.00049255113,0.00013618896,0.000054005355,0.08008537,0.9170892,0.000018683715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012511881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025576986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9985002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019616103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013799078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060420632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004082968","doi":"10.1037/teo0000133","title":"Critical feminist history of psychology versus sociology of scientific knowledge: Contrasting views of women scientists?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; History of psychology; Feminism; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Epistemology; Psychology; Social science; Psychoanalysis; Gender studies; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09419881842847208,"score_gpt":0.4172327106056273,"score_spread":0.32303389217715517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004082968","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019332578,0.033310343,0.0017915961,0.73599476,0.0020041757,0.000026888247,0.00007632258,0.000020966203,0.20744237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86453044,0.015079999,0.00073781126,0.08745556,0.0056184027,0.000117654505,0.000043518517,0.00013766938,0.026278999],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99250823,0.005006136,0.00012093108,0.000597092,0.0008235399,0.0009441644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97570896,0.01974667,0.0010410036,0.00057300815,0.0013236038,0.001606674],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017502086,0.00055045966,0.0008274501,0.00420843,0.011706644,0.016419467,0.0018971331,0.009413128,0.010614706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020988913,0.00048902223,0.0002759284,0.0032117607,0.07933203,0.013562565,0.0058748303,0.010519324,0.0008526166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002434822,0.000018363899,0.00029274612,0.00007368854,0.0000052392743,0.000071406874,0.047599312,0.000021164613,0.00006819477,0.9350414,0.011405695,0.0053783567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045813464,0.000025841866,0.0012304098,0.0009610666,0.000016567586,0.00013151886,0.07981463,0.00008657563,0.0003247591,0.41801155,0.49933362,0.000017687933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011170728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014499014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98829335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013787043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011149454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10003251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}