{"meta":{"query_hash":"134cb3676b8c","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology"},"cohort_total":13,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":13,"exported":13,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/134cb3676b8c","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Theoretical+and+Philosophical+Psychology"},"results":[{"id":"W1982056669","doi":"10.1037/a0023427","title":"On the ambiguity of concept use in commentaries.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07385694327672293,"score_gpt":0.33402903704526504,"score_spread":0.2601720937685421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982056669","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9306315,0.00024271286,0.00041264403,0.024753703,0.00068976136,0.0001286221,0.000015926425,0.000005229132,0.04311987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98838556,0.000027096534,0.000092898976,0.011308375,0.00015970705,0.0000030314818,0.0000011285985,0.000009191401,0.000013024351],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829155,0.00063508557,0.0005534503,0.00016170517,0.00016105891,0.00019715451],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981438,0.0012030756,0.00022732998,0.00023806415,0.00008012413,0.00010761094],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007683549,0.00012578987,0.00034839168,0.000102089725,0.00003365342,0.000008000309,0.0002493806,0.00019224247,0.0049527474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041483977,0.00007088967,0.0001231319,0.00011939467,0.0016352651,0.00004859125,0.000035017765,0.00066829403,0.000014334824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020689848,0.0007787709,0.0012280095,0.0000031170775,0.00007629738,0.00009436929,0.0016799194,7.773425e-8,0.00007562228,0.99081314,0.0013803357,0.0018013625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014090096,0.0014214427,0.025922572,0.000030755313,0.000047450078,0.00017174358,0.00016982139,0.0000016518494,0.0002324068,0.97030336,0.00021074562,0.000079026875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022741162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002574763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057754014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008305115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008036877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99595684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987547682","doi":"10.1037/a0022077","title":"On the ambiguity of concept use in psychology: Is the concept “concept” a useful concept?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07386244450551185,"score_gpt":0.3393515116932449,"score_spread":0.265489067187733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987547682","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8036011,0.0017163553,0.0005081504,0.15843852,0.0019889988,0.0005367553,0.00006760156,0.000027279992,0.033115264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682299,0.00008199793,0.00016893378,0.030970704,0.0004471397,0.000008015776,0.000002053431,0.00002987031,0.00006142067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958523,0.0014261117,0.0012407526,0.00055503537,0.00038169717,0.00054409204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962737,0.0020153916,0.0006256851,0.00066644256,0.00017780883,0.00024095153],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013079569,0.0003667953,0.00081786094,0.00015104619,0.00013897946,0.000027118085,0.00091739267,0.0004774062,0.008098906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006854885,0.00019420973,0.0003327455,0.00031622287,0.0060614315,0.00008228022,0.00012871104,0.0020401485,0.00004802692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002086832,0.00084396783,0.0030253676,0.0000029092578,0.00021404632,0.00012481002,0.008593225,0.000001253039,0.00009473643,0.96873546,0.012957351,0.0033200257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031476144,0.0030308575,0.1915785,0.00011567121,0.000079447425,0.00047592891,0.00027353567,0.0000048550623,0.00026486945,0.7953076,0.005435524,0.00028560523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014287499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000012327682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18855314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020529495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004012495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012656741","doi":"10.1037/h0091257","title":"Analogy and Metaphor Running Amok: An Examination of the Use of Explanatory Devices in Neuroscience.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Metaphor; Psychology; Explanatory model; Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06144601990434982,"score_gpt":0.34237851266103664,"score_spread":0.2809324927566868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012656741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99213094,0.000616083,0.00021834392,0.005024979,0.00030457563,0.00007949337,0.000006394529,0.000002927033,0.0016162832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997186,0.00009031447,0.00028939496,0.0022491072,0.00016869504,0.000001801836,7.526761e-7,0.000007951508,0.000006005235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808913,0.0007034276,0.00061953947,0.00021271614,0.00020270422,0.00017247761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989228,0.00032068684,0.00035729166,0.00018902078,0.00010046168,0.000109715555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010068686,0.000115660165,0.00036259388,0.00023846491,0.00003687863,0.00001094341,0.0002156534,0.0001783675,0.00018270388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022015275,0.00007211948,0.00008002457,0.00022958133,0.0013281915,0.00018554823,0.00004102778,0.000391623,7.470791e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068764604,0.0007082476,0.014581604,0.000023908957,0.000046281424,0.000037646318,0.0019543539,0.000008290536,0.006459161,0.93718356,0.000044425116,0.038264878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014408743,0.0011042516,0.7317043,0.0000499346,0.00011235903,0.0005417872,0.00021936622,0.00018084091,0.00024827864,0.26367676,0.0005997638,0.00012146215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000043363634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000070325473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71712273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000063238867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011679958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48937768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062186509","doi":"10.1037/a0029990","title":"Concepts in Aristotle and Aquinas: Implications for current theoretical approaches.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Classical Philosophy and Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Current (fluid); Philosophy; Psychology; Physics","score_opus":0.11531791967749072,"score_gpt":0.3640962891739194,"score_spread":0.24877836949642868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062186509","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28106028,0.014331422,0.0043321755,0.5427168,0.0031499877,0.00093121495,0.0001577369,0.00004600818,0.15327436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956658,0.00015306873,0.00020719532,0.001147068,0.0027855372,0.000016407404,0.0000035090359,0.000016090737,0.000005327815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986438,0.00016458592,0.0005397351,0.0002007677,0.00010821489,0.00034290194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985328,0.0007771559,0.00014147708,0.00014378461,0.00007502899,0.0003298069],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007264902,0.00017264293,0.0004153983,0.00010948188,0.00012450121,0.00003984948,0.00016207033,0.00014016207,0.00024991127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026603712,0.00011843975,0.00013287031,0.00004452249,0.004041957,0.00014456546,0.00005946026,0.00055825926,0.0000054471907],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036213163,0.0005704659,0.0004386138,0.000031325697,0.000024423207,0.0000015222132,0.0010269689,1.1272573e-7,0.000025161333,0.9890708,0.000255918,0.008192594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010434639,0.00043792799,0.0016650088,0.000034128083,0.000058509933,0.000111556765,0.000046465837,0.000030081395,0.0000044155245,0.96952415,0.026898997,0.00014532657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":2.1160587e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.5922073e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7146055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015339623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012090506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084920254","doi":"10.1037/h0091284","title":"There are no \"specific correct\" usages of concepts, only correct usages: Linguistic rules and the bounds of sense.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Sense (electronics); Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02707376872999943,"score_gpt":0.34273762586267353,"score_spread":0.3156638571326741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084920254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90320456,0.0110492995,0.002242015,0.0056105885,0.0028022798,0.00023886134,0.000049688726,0.000014293625,0.074788414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959205,0.0010321285,0.00021552437,0.0014466143,0.0012690299,0.0000018006015,0.0000032034065,0.000023552466,0.00008764521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971944,0.0007908826,0.0010427898,0.00030659646,0.00032339658,0.00034192592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995845,0.0024370751,0.0007666732,0.0003206712,0.00042717336,0.00020337514],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022368704,0.000251603,0.0008720271,0.00016005953,0.00009463029,0.000022321135,0.0002672414,0.00036220794,0.0012560156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009380727,0.00014716746,0.00025734268,0.00016513112,0.0052236714,0.000035595094,0.00005537799,0.00082776765,0.000020901563],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009103807,0.0005232188,0.0022681623,0.00005440838,0.00032359123,0.0003548195,0.0023602587,2.1605709e-7,0.00083370286,0.9707189,0.0009407239,0.012518159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005459899,0.0018687261,0.02310749,0.00022405543,0.00031391706,0.0029853757,0.0011592822,0.000009019744,0.00018370124,0.9616129,0.0028301256,0.0002455407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006887452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000022861486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09271595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010287063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002367142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153048194","doi":"10.1037/teo0000018","title":"The historical boundedness of psychological knowledge and the ethics of shared understandings.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychological science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12423458155784396,"score_gpt":0.42815327218275645,"score_spread":0.3039186906249125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153048194","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07917405,0.07777678,0.015272309,0.5362835,0.012312498,0.00070708507,0.000024672205,0.00004074558,0.27840832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99566674,0.0015404463,0.0003490866,0.001528202,0.00072452944,0.0000066364187,4.4718462e-7,0.000021506281,0.00016242827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99537534,0.0019967481,0.0013789124,0.00040401358,0.00045001568,0.0003949805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99281657,0.005014702,0.000815495,0.0004626602,0.0004990918,0.00039147452],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055314815,0.00026379994,0.0009831942,0.00014422584,0.00021571526,0.000015600204,0.0008449653,0.0009456918,0.00015552006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026731207,0.00013211554,0.00027903996,0.00032794374,0.014873438,0.000058311853,0.00017657511,0.002751649,0.0000069800076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008311611,0.00053523347,0.0003826918,0.000015684887,0.00017645195,0.000018539835,0.0053787194,2.2190463e-7,0.000032197535,0.9689117,0.014498801,0.0017381349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005079791,0.00213282,0.001610458,0.000031125088,0.00014630392,0.0010425854,0.00065003656,0.000011490019,0.0000018096541,0.9678763,0.021273626,0.00014361175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005984588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.42638e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91649264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014108878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058822192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158807583","doi":"10.1037/a0033033","title":"Social justice and psychology: What is, and what should be.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Social justice; Psychology; Social psychology; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Sociology; Criminology; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06645792874642947,"score_gpt":0.4183957804214494,"score_spread":0.35193785167501995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158807583","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23756565,0.0051939455,0.00009794,0.7458207,0.0017369608,0.00014987569,0.0000015711029,0.000016091939,0.009417272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8359574,0.031519555,0.0001803208,0.13003314,0.0022463931,0.000005664411,5.88997e-7,0.000015996133,0.00004092273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755824,0.0006654663,0.0005743777,0.00039949105,0.00031994522,0.0004824745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834454,0.00056476495,0.00023522844,0.00013317721,0.00022576239,0.0004965032],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010973186,0.00022381284,0.0005479712,0.00013545876,0.000470816,0.00044293757,0.00031251853,0.0007261399,0.0013116976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002467621,0.00017358473,0.00012718812,0.00016961701,0.006231143,0.0012895714,0.00009669882,0.00088700745,0.000023086048],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030119537,0.00014966298,0.00019933729,0.000018181316,0.000080527185,0.000023882332,0.0047015985,5.35001e-9,0.00037740247,0.9090586,0.020318665,0.06477099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010375037,0.00066958653,0.004262338,0.000040750336,0.00013429766,0.00024276863,0.0024218867,0.0000036247382,0.0000042230613,0.93997157,0.05101561,0.00019584046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009595454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000027124695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61578757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001606432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023350653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519069346","doi":"10.1037/teo0000048","title":"Quantification in psychology: Critical analysis of an unreflective practice.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Cognitive Abilities and Testing","field":"Psychology","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07144827821364612,"score_gpt":0.4601562174715627,"score_spread":0.3887079392579166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519069346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79175925,0.0006364844,0.018381154,0.15136835,0.0008034667,0.00015833921,0.00004135409,0.000017070795,0.036834523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99553424,0.000096692,0.001532721,0.0025516935,0.0002571075,0.000005835123,0.0000016754922,0.000015063162,0.0000049448504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99655175,0.0013745731,0.0010664081,0.00044591835,0.0002297928,0.0003315767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924653,0.006023662,0.00039232706,0.00036217988,0.0005255457,0.0002309849],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021730298,0.00017611276,0.0006966489,0.00068773085,0.000040145627,0.000010980724,0.00026439579,0.0003218217,0.0013994885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005399977,0.00011363071,0.00021167162,0.00073481584,0.0022982042,0.00020363143,0.00004058691,0.00050425954,0.000012652658],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031154722,0.0015179046,0.007090131,0.000006939557,0.0004980296,0.00009577605,0.00038617774,5.4845236e-7,0.0027682032,0.9360256,0.000040371207,0.04845481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015303779,0.0022728608,0.1326359,0.000045870558,0.0006198748,0.00040048885,0.00015432801,0.000033856984,0.00004525087,0.8618529,0.00026539955,0.0001428877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005588492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003102956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20377502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020802423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022103048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529841034","doi":"10.1037/teo0000025","title":"Constructing psychological objects: The rhetoric of constructs.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Cognitive and psychological constructs research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rhetoric; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.10990918706485021,"score_gpt":0.4245541460557932,"score_spread":0.314644958990943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529841034","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6083705,0.0023196277,0.0010021572,0.030308785,0.0024885563,0.00027455285,0.000029067269,0.000022911965,0.35518387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99574715,0.00012604616,0.00081186823,0.002443281,0.0008100906,0.0000058763553,0.0000016416553,0.000019188345,0.000034883265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995705,0.0014727544,0.0012399364,0.0004486798,0.0005891685,0.00054445164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99550796,0.0020906476,0.000576324,0.00047232592,0.000757133,0.00059562695],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026045572,0.00029079508,0.00082170044,0.00023297845,0.00009381419,0.000033004824,0.0007523899,0.00047719022,0.0024042898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019426157,0.00016183125,0.0002724024,0.0005733579,0.0078065153,0.00007826914,0.00016247063,0.0016167869,0.00006010794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022733388,0.0003787806,0.0044903303,0.000010778594,0.0001809019,0.00020517384,0.00037779284,1.4041706e-7,0.00017729511,0.9321955,0.0014098538,0.058300108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035368607,0.0035873498,0.0061345124,0.000047394034,0.00009977033,0.0085475305,0.0011734352,0.0000054098814,0.00005225681,0.97473407,0.0018617794,0.00021964492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001872378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.2314005e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38737667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025621473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054615917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890366377","doi":"10.1037/teo0000097","title":"What is social justice? Implications for psychology.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Community Health and Development","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Social justice; Psychology; Social psychology; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Sociology; Criminology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.15206380488427257,"score_gpt":0.54872642740767,"score_spread":0.3966626225233974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890366377","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03974443,0.00044912612,0.0053432505,0.9345735,0.0036904512,0.00044845187,0.000023355597,0.000018696363,0.015708761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78585756,0.0010481387,0.0023033642,0.2061458,0.004535263,0.00003381426,0.0000037834886,0.000018233513,0.000054054235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976741,0.0005326876,0.0009509185,0.00021943967,0.00012594694,0.00049692637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99692136,0.0014239129,0.00036515415,0.00026084078,0.00063807354,0.00039066994],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001576571,0.00015050668,0.00043422854,0.0001376045,0.0011183739,0.0000145522135,0.00034257604,0.00048020593,0.0009969489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042938898,0.000112646405,0.00012531278,0.00015385725,0.0013078153,0.00011379855,0.000102246675,0.0011066911,0.000080569494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014062419,0.00019747938,0.0006073352,0.00009085675,0.000043205564,0.0000014538413,0.0014667362,4.756808e-9,0.00012611345,0.90317583,0.07690737,0.015977347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001729896,0.00090679026,0.019744802,0.000060631955,0.00007299571,0.000067235815,0.00015588956,0.000004398684,0.0000022263127,0.8483018,0.1288533,0.00009998568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":3.617535e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000011502281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7461131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033253164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013991696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003425151","doi":"10.1037/teo0000134","title":"Doing science, doing gender: Using history in the present.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Diverse Educational Innovations Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11363535479570377,"score_gpt":0.3357960371105712,"score_spread":0.22216068231486744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003425151","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77538383,0.0007281325,0.000060504462,0.20543602,0.00032527008,0.000069553236,0.0000021316725,0.0000047289054,0.017989848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883009,0.000049987066,0.00089081086,0.009762159,0.0009934134,7.919864e-7,4.14663e-7,5.67505e-7,9.432108e-7],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892306,0.00013096388,0.00031135033,0.00016274666,0.00029664076,0.00017522619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992347,0.00037294693,0.0001244961,0.000033637825,0.00013800836,0.00009624692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083607656,0.00007911088,0.00015935856,0.000037202564,0.00013643544,0.000026709766,0.00038208388,0.000052994757,0.00027030765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022685011,0.000027044365,0.000052358195,0.0004622372,0.001405434,0.0001225277,0.00007972874,0.00034007968,0.0000039981196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096534604,0.00014394501,0.002073935,0.000004910514,0.000012823143,0.00002223175,0.0006663134,0.0000086648115,0.01654401,0.974175,0.0012606545,0.004991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005242225,0.0007307978,0.059141763,0.000031483363,0.000044562545,0.00040420337,0.0009951438,0.00030037292,0.00004600512,0.8103035,0.12724847,0.00022945259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000018805081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.67314e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2129171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032851724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025244426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.517838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003770492","doi":"10.1037/teo0000140","title":"Possibility for women in psychology and interdisciplinary sciences: Introduction to the special issue.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03813592727804413,"score_gpt":0.4040453681359281,"score_spread":0.365909440857884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003770492","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08998715,0.00094685866,0.0036256304,0.8647404,0.0035985038,0.00039867955,0.000012543037,0.0000130024055,0.03667729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94064784,0.00014627872,0.00073196075,0.030706873,0.027666373,0.000029758045,5.9159834e-7,0.000018547385,0.000051758147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971775,0.000534175,0.00081593805,0.00074615446,0.00017206073,0.00055416976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983887,0.0005853028,0.00021329735,0.00024607265,0.00008728312,0.00047934608],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002258266,0.00021524467,0.0006083443,0.00019459029,0.00017288132,0.000018091057,0.00056720886,0.0003919633,0.0016056389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008292854,0.00014136334,0.00011140182,0.00042488627,0.0032774003,0.00007411167,0.00021361503,0.001162782,0.000041609328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008897003,0.00041376922,0.00084169547,0.000018874853,0.000077249315,0.00003382967,0.01257018,0.0000025470908,0.0001695791,0.8225056,0.11432208,0.0401476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015576641,0.0050910558,0.006975282,0.000007490223,0.000021084716,0.00044420664,0.0006516563,0.000018339037,0.0000010688441,0.86710876,0.11797762,0.00014580127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":5.5278275e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.534561e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8506607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005948723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020819274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004082968","doi":"10.1037/teo0000133","title":"Critical feminist history of psychology versus sociology of scientific knowledge: Contrasting views of women scientists?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology","topic":"Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; History of psychology; Feminism; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Epistemology; Psychology; Social science; Psychoanalysis; Gender studies; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09419881842847208,"score_gpt":0.4172327106056273,"score_spread":0.32303389217715517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004082968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55713165,0.02840318,0.008916484,0.05118274,0.026006013,0.00045052543,0.000103958264,0.000042929718,0.32776254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957184,0.00011661162,0.00097141793,0.002194362,0.0008971275,0.0000072554817,0.0000018147572,0.00003236101,0.000060632356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99459374,0.0011807503,0.0022977397,0.000790134,0.00037997376,0.00075768924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99414736,0.0027294257,0.0012549844,0.00048028358,0.0006703543,0.0007175686],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027368327,0.00034093732,0.0018226281,0.00041371645,0.00008463297,0.0000049322844,0.0010020146,0.0009351624,0.0036113851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037725952,0.00028929344,0.00042758946,0.000429191,0.034803454,0.000078893805,0.00018242733,0.0016513389,0.000027649225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008456209,0.0013330778,0.000613659,0.00012257784,0.00030756491,0.00004865568,0.016108047,2.7158504e-7,0.009263376,0.9451056,0.015005001,0.0036359234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007245801,0.010760489,0.0025929112,0.000084990024,0.00028920427,0.0004967216,0.0009850872,0.000030601874,0.00006421815,0.91947776,0.05758445,0.00038775182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000010381345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.1639021e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43858677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000230145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020415596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}