{"meta":{"query_hash":"c4ec260d4075","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Threat Assessment and Management"},"cohort_total":16,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":16,"exported":16,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c4ec260d4075","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Threat+Assessment+and+Management"},"results":[{"id":"W2163840770","doi":"10.1037/tam0000016","title":"Threats, approach behavior, and violent recidivism among offenders who harass Canadian justice officials.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Threat Assessment and Management","topic":"Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care; Government of Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Recidivism; Criminology; Economic Justice; Psychology; Criminal justice; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.030179983751443776,"score_gpt":0.32640641804669734,"score_spread":0.2962264342952536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163840770","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5373859,0.0016831858,0.012383407,0.00296001,0.0023839846,0.0017677394,0.000011416215,0.00006710765,0.44135725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860695,0.007456024,0.003464599,0.00032173836,0.00042710677,0.000026447227,0.000005145012,0.000024014456,0.0022054333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976071,0.00022896194,0.0004877924,0.0003322809,0.0007895758,0.0005542609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860084,0.00007566816,0.00042789298,0.00020579902,0.00012579729,0.0005640063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021521922,0.0002557641,0.00044091023,0.0004068402,0.0008519359,0.00039090682,0.00029577647,0.00012098476,0.00005885927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019183832,0.00022842268,0.0001228998,0.00017917098,0.00026778894,0.00040183568,0.00011276894,0.00026044657,0.0000014173838],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007083583,0.0006667872,0.2918709,0.00037316643,0.00095030107,0.00020601289,0.012584309,0.00008602802,0.000030650237,0.43674344,0.015041279,0.24137633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019726527,0.0004075883,0.89916056,0.0003234618,0.0019523667,0.000018584458,0.026809564,0.0004270677,0.000008905344,0.0051628374,0.06312806,0.0006283234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015100525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03199295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60728973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060121896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018729286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.991458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318446362","doi":"10.1037/tam0000002","title":"An examination of the Danger Assessment as a victim-based risk assessment instrument for lethal intimate partner violence.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Threat Assessment and Management","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Intimate partner; Risk assessment; Psychology; Medical emergency; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Criminology; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.022088389987859298,"score_gpt":0.363985525257333,"score_spread":0.34189713526947374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318446362","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88491863,0.0001012414,0.04353759,0.0013947098,0.0012691836,0.0031362013,0.000019139834,0.000036981983,0.06558634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96675223,0.0011124021,0.03136238,0.00023016456,0.00014143137,0.00022453298,0.0000068385075,0.00001951018,0.00015048028],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99678904,0.00057144713,0.0007697189,0.00029963814,0.0011467934,0.0004233441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977612,0.00015344893,0.0010062355,0.00035986942,0.0005379481,0.00018132613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032324188,0.00025463593,0.0004091817,0.00021970275,0.00062558666,0.0003001228,0.00058331294,0.00009954853,0.0001788475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020454077,0.00017663631,0.00022795153,0.00024652382,0.00026369502,0.0008060888,0.00013786436,0.00027069615,0.0000027108479],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013511787,0.002903239,0.16842489,0.0006399266,0.0010871593,0.0000204788,0.0036559654,0.0021668714,0.0024333776,0.30099037,0.0025166862,0.5150259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020378816,0.000985326,0.9616083,0.00048440698,0.0004987424,0.0000029757541,0.009051313,0.0122360755,0.000440412,0.010065844,0.0022621178,0.0003266365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038448995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021623122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7931834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044594123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029758786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.720302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337027510","doi":"10.1037/tam0000048","title":"Predictors of trivialization of workplace violence among healthcare workers and law enforcers.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Threat Assessment and Management","topic":"Workplace Violence and Bullying","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Law enforcement; Workplace violence; Health care; Occupational safety and health; Enforcement; Work (physics); Criminology; Psychology; Human factors and ergonomics; Nursing; Law; Poison control; Political science; Medicine; Medical emergency; Engineering","score_opus":0.028186707556419926,"score_gpt":0.33990386187080174,"score_spread":0.3117171543143818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337027510","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98283184,0.0014122797,0.0016813689,0.0010405099,0.0004525092,0.00037257938,0.000001490699,0.000009859776,0.012197576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915681,0.0069008605,0.0011492042,0.00004179624,0.00008820856,0.0000029019152,8.936306e-7,0.0000051492607,0.00024292544],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986883,0.00011896259,0.00039721478,0.00010039276,0.0005372231,0.00015794238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990415,0.000049618917,0.0005152066,0.000080534526,0.00016417779,0.00014895746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014390595,0.000087313994,0.0002460311,0.00013499617,0.00011302878,0.00004112152,0.00013674544,0.000057064135,0.0000073192887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014700256,0.0000724366,0.00004816993,0.0002210826,0.0002478467,0.00035923684,0.0000701425,0.0000865819,1.1405532e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009820489,0.000052799154,0.95649904,0.00015141061,0.00012097754,0.0000072088874,0.0031486095,0.0001541701,0.000008321397,0.030163294,0.0008988694,0.008697097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007854497,0.0027053389,0.55127233,0.014129197,0.0012800584,0.000010744641,0.37963188,0.00055547815,0.00046848372,0.021403408,0.019829499,0.0008590892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008149094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032831577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4052267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096479016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009754994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29538786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2542929022","doi":"10.1037/tam0000067","title":"An introduction to the issues of cross-cultural assessment inspired by Ewert v. Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Threat Assessment and Management","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cross-cultural; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.018955678066045444,"score_gpt":0.3913722223366545,"score_spread":0.37241654427060905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2542929022","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81485337,0.0010291963,0.0062631164,0.091104515,0.07232547,0.0009526229,0.000057779016,0.00003369833,0.013380215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99088365,0.0002718267,0.0026417158,0.00054261705,0.0023070704,0.000024751262,0.0000074489612,0.000025143438,0.0032958041],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782974,0.00015577393,0.0007045547,0.00032813245,0.00064827164,0.0003335187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984693,0.000044208147,0.0005563682,0.0005075661,0.0002394169,0.00018315672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008911791,0.00023604248,0.00036728842,0.00014849484,0.00014397106,0.00010986655,0.0004608179,0.00005269671,0.00021442103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009760519,0.00012829735,0.000079145844,0.00018853165,0.00011014796,0.00044391933,0.00009265458,0.00015357611,0.000002907704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020619757,0.00030852767,0.03166683,0.000029097,0.00057331234,0.000021208854,0.00035655772,0.000018316317,0.00280798,0.017944576,0.90105194,0.045015484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021804832,0.0013369959,0.41243896,0.00009417063,0.0001876124,0.000053484135,0.0032258895,0.000010187108,0.00027043704,0.0005345684,0.57939184,0.00027541016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041672126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061541307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3807721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037593782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000078070596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62996066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2546147437","doi":"10.1037/tam0000064","title":"What we know and don’t know about risk assessment with offenders of indigenous heritage.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Threat Assessment and Management","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Public Safety Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Need to know; Criminology; History; Psychology; Computer security; Computer science; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.016154868232839226,"score_gpt":0.3230513662303999,"score_spread":0.30689649799756064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2546147437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8592938,0.039841596,0.020755958,0.006446941,0.046077583,0.0019243036,0.000040416304,0.00007785744,0.025541516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8876156,0.096847996,0.012159119,0.0001723722,0.00056027673,0.000037733273,0.0000029145476,0.000072508665,0.0025314623],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972765,0.00022999189,0.0008427912,0.00046446567,0.00066261773,0.0005236681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766976,0.00016228946,0.001271408,0.000500261,0.00013792979,0.00025832784],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010677871,0.00040867395,0.0007031961,0.0004730854,0.00016444248,0.00016065144,0.00033717504,0.000116858304,0.0001924148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004096516,0.00025652559,0.00013911315,0.00021021409,0.000249376,0.00077543146,0.00016120519,0.0003120609,0.0000044594453],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00080957374,0.0011063429,0.2012991,0.00034638448,0.0037739563,0.0003278852,0.003175391,0.000007652546,0.00033466434,0.011306736,0.031708322,0.745804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015100535,0.006663824,0.84400177,0.0045768865,0.001699572,0.00045758855,0.03877938,0.000022451066,0.00006591146,0.005799011,0.0818661,0.0009669561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031670246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000078951176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74483705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002245484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007525623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604997795","doi":"10.1037/tam0000080","title":"Instrumental and reactive intimate partner violence: Offender characteristics, reoffense rates, and risk management.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Threat Assessment and Management","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Domestic violence; Psychology; Criminology; Medical emergency; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Medicine","score_opus":0.026470953254774155,"score_gpt":0.3632171558072705,"score_spread":0.3367462025524963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604997795","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87861764,0.00050071435,0.0004985447,0.00037631844,0.0007922373,0.0005808376,0.000014949825,0.00001975426,0.118599005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8946274,0.10120163,0.0032612025,0.00008477852,0.00013144122,0.000011721347,0.000002434163,0.000011928406,0.0006674579],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844474,0.00013260498,0.00038598923,0.0002765563,0.0004294838,0.000330659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987375,0.00004132479,0.0006987152,0.00024323522,0.000092199996,0.00018702021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001376133,0.00021110746,0.00034537882,0.00014449932,0.0012710664,0.0006426221,0.00027379478,0.00006464587,0.000029252287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001792778,0.00017083222,0.000058725633,0.00004363349,0.0005000906,0.0007987847,0.00041645268,0.00021916704,0.0000029480138],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021207226,0.00018970248,0.54193854,0.0002211298,0.0008752027,0.0002923603,0.0015100982,6.2094927e-7,0.000034261728,0.12534392,0.0014012896,0.3279808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012929045,0.00014807886,0.97623545,0.00041316586,0.00044421494,0.000015374713,0.0056687375,0.000109384186,0.000022995238,0.0076972027,0.0077101053,0.0002424002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021825935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002092592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43429688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000100416604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024176672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97761434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213165994","doi":"10.1037/tam0000175","title":"A field study on the police use of the Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment (ODARA).","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Threat Assessment and Management","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Criminology; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05070441713170001,"score_gpt":0.3802983328242582,"score_spread":0.3295939156925582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213165994","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92802036,0.000030133044,0.00039448583,0.0023610515,0.0008911187,0.0010489373,0.000005791698,0.00000823869,0.06723989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969662,0.00023502049,0.0003897133,0.00064211746,0.000057279816,0.000041613202,2.7845834e-7,0.000006523345,0.0016612794],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722576,0.0007189184,0.00039175223,0.00014683628,0.0012988473,0.00021790268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986025,0.00042129256,0.0005180574,0.00029423134,0.00010727291,0.000056639175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025977907,0.00012653433,0.00022319246,0.00009888585,0.001115097,0.00014951204,0.0005463088,0.000024109648,0.00020437766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024287998,0.00007188422,0.00014372372,0.00023180297,0.000085597225,0.00016896673,0.00039016374,0.0005569812,7.311928e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017849206,0.0019221575,0.86102074,0.000024576975,0.0008486256,0.00005215832,0.025486639,0.0010726777,0.000014955094,0.08930332,0.014583289,0.005492376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006151879,0.0011017931,0.92840105,0.00004711944,0.00035284436,0.0000026340488,0.049744204,0.00006786714,0.000004186098,0.0012851846,0.018270079,0.00010781577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024668718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068910425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.088018134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004609161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020199498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9818261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304957134","doi":"10.1037/tam0000192","title":"Latent class analysis of the heterogeneity of intimate partner violent men: Implications for research and practice.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Threat Assessment and Management","topic":"Viral Infections and Vectors","field":"Medicine","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Latent class model; Class (philosophy); Psychology; Criminology; Social psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.14885983152803894,"score_gpt":0.49049336538174176,"score_spread":0.3416335338537028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4304957134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9828837,0.00046845025,0.0019885374,0.01124129,0.00010444767,0.0008447904,0.000025345951,0.000003295211,0.002440122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99727225,0.0011307548,0.0012579891,0.00006996145,0.000016884787,0.000055759374,0.000004640666,0.000005325954,0.00018643755],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897015,0.00012220663,0.0003775194,0.00010531223,0.00031388097,0.000110924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990034,0.000121460325,0.00034915554,0.00019860135,0.0002777197,0.00004964456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016466852,0.000063405576,0.00027039833,0.00035746847,0.00019975951,0.00001607982,0.00008025895,0.000015240114,0.000021242118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017186454,0.00004031713,0.00016443749,0.00043122732,0.00006772907,0.000069320544,0.0002468891,0.00013871567,2.9805413e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001345142,0.004198861,0.83057797,0.0007107088,0.021333633,0.000015384758,0.0004885912,0.0035125301,0.011876476,0.09487224,0.010836295,0.020232152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001327643,0.0017670204,0.9773674,0.00004899328,0.004815388,0.00004264226,0.0012653053,0.0017075788,0.00048884767,0.0011571916,0.0099499775,0.00006203939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022404478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008257217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14678939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012318684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033130662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16440849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390908902","doi":"10.1037/tam0000224","title":"An analysis of terrorist attack perpetrators in England and Wales: Comparing lone actors, lone dyads, and group actors.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Threat Assessment and Management","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Criminology; Group (periodic table); Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.029788490546232282,"score_gpt":0.3797817427906156,"score_spread":0.3499932522443833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390908902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958854,0.001758877,0.00096076494,0.00047403798,0.00032876103,0.00015865345,0.00000865059,0.000015730617,0.0004091704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924024,0.007157435,0.00017044196,0.000041460004,0.00015162768,0.000003602573,0.000005765152,0.000010350159,0.00005695603],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828523,0.00016539301,0.0005227536,0.00026731408,0.0004629131,0.00029641253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992766,0.00013509668,0.00016861175,0.00013608378,0.000046166824,0.00023745632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011230501,0.00018434353,0.00053512485,0.00061960466,0.00012352038,0.00026987732,0.00018380582,0.000078011246,0.00003109544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008653506,0.00014956584,0.00009583862,0.00042151165,0.0002223635,0.00061559264,0.00008378117,0.00021978891,2.5309188e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007291142,0.00032978065,0.9185775,0.00041454885,0.0012201291,0.00017942292,0.05339894,0.00002409903,0.000120162345,0.0037564351,0.00012278356,0.021783315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085530884,0.00043785153,0.8957523,0.0004982354,0.001410355,0.0000062730996,0.09322054,0.0033008566,0.000008280394,0.00031454608,0.0039226376,0.00027282903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007133717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003557925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0398216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016674063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038049533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6099118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392561967","doi":"10.1037/tam0000229","title":"Differentiating between harmless and harmful threats: What factors increase risk of violence following threats?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Threat Assessment and Management","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Environmental health; Criminology; Computer security; Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Medicine; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03385810243185493,"score_gpt":0.3718506498165,"score_spread":0.33799254738464507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392561967","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9834293,0.010183232,0.0038399305,0.00063946826,0.0009853983,0.00026607886,0.000013722135,0.000033141354,0.00060973637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.933218,0.06608003,0.00025516198,0.00003656379,0.00027037007,0.0000056255894,0.0000028040974,0.000016520755,0.000114935145],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777114,0.0002445896,0.0006008385,0.00028930668,0.00070751965,0.00038657247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987427,0.0004324419,0.00030997497,0.000161439,0.00007698139,0.00027644428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013231905,0.00024414857,0.00049926614,0.00024716023,0.00032039933,0.00057950907,0.00028673225,0.00008927796,0.00003406288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025147892,0.00018411879,0.00023508955,0.00018688223,0.00015382557,0.0013322694,0.00018348041,0.00030363534,0.0000010732506],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025804422,0.00011076699,0.6203844,0.00044057422,0.0011290191,0.000121963094,0.018220128,0.0000020337575,0.00004606448,0.004614251,0.00008347074,0.35482153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013240039,0.00051058916,0.6457868,0.009607572,0.0031498321,0.0000071235568,0.30244824,0.00029187472,0.00018022684,0.035327125,0.0007339835,0.00063262426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043162398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006759267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3541889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015386245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007235312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7508146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402641639","doi":"10.1037/tam0000235","title":"A comprehensive examination of the role of the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide, Domestic Violence Risk Appraisal Guide, Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment, and Danger Assessment in Canadian courts and tribunals.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Threat Assessment and Management","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Risk assessment; Domestic violence; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Environmental health; Medicine; Criminology; Medical emergency; Psychology; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.013265715951946365,"score_gpt":0.35866700828342635,"score_spread":0.34540129233148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402641639","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9427341,0.0024549088,0.0021625708,0.0005546662,0.001492385,0.0017156783,0.00015238291,0.000022839125,0.048710473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97448677,0.020476703,0.0045358413,0.00006354369,0.00009689474,0.0000503897,0.0000067049973,0.000026746859,0.0002563912],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942445,0.0014562003,0.0013231141,0.00053389673,0.0017941784,0.0006480936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963973,0.00092506973,0.0013249206,0.0004421353,0.0006277311,0.00028280172],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00654028,0.00042590118,0.00075129047,0.00050481263,0.0007214779,0.00039764724,0.00062633265,0.00021235776,0.000045040026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014203311,0.0002887623,0.00022062351,0.00054895104,0.0005915118,0.00075228384,0.00040062587,0.0012853205,5.336729e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028615947,0.0002998582,0.89666605,0.00025716648,0.0006554233,0.0000870619,0.0025252795,0.00073139585,0.000110197434,0.045636095,0.00061457703,0.052388273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012083448,0.00027633912,0.9650835,0.0011745045,0.0010124294,0.000022353288,0.0075750947,0.006296534,0.000012738482,0.006670449,0.010367469,0.0003002353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23748252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16202226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07546025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016699099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022233755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402798286","doi":"10.1037/tam0000235.supp","title":"Supplemental Material for A Comprehensive Examination of the Role of the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide, Domestic Violence Risk Appraisal Guide, Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment, and Danger Assessment in Canadian Courts and Tribunals","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Threat Assessment and Management","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Risk assessment; Domestic violence; Risk management tools; Medicine; Occupational safety and health; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Actuarial science; Environmental health; Medical emergency; Business; Computer security","score_opus":0.016190900537173755,"score_gpt":0.3723334633045471,"score_spread":0.3561425627673733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402798286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9788984,0.0006819007,0.002373128,0.00048675798,0.0019349382,0.0025684675,0.00084458856,0.000020732357,0.012191106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98442835,0.0075687515,0.0075136363,0.00004919137,0.00013827767,0.00010718259,0.000029602708,0.000027982938,0.00013700417],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950717,0.0010504989,0.0013182721,0.00049768353,0.0014192958,0.000642525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99688005,0.0007929888,0.0012360939,0.00034401115,0.00051554764,0.00023129965],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059190174,0.00039949626,0.00071113795,0.00040925932,0.00071015995,0.0004215669,0.00053802587,0.00018202535,0.00007888243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009581081,0.00027575772,0.00021808848,0.000330472,0.00046616548,0.0006758744,0.00035160102,0.0007407222,2.5006128e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097247554,0.00044944492,0.8903011,0.00045442994,0.0010153987,0.000062039355,0.003038094,0.00047374718,0.00054957793,0.06336267,0.0019934739,0.038202763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018844653,0.0004302462,0.96488893,0.0008609133,0.0011295166,0.000018478106,0.008497081,0.004997688,0.000051091218,0.0055175456,0.011420452,0.00030361384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18365672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15190671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0745878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015508353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017554357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403718102","doi":"10.1037/tam0000239","title":"Police and researcher use of the Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment (ODARA): Interrater agreement and examination of published norms.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Threat Assessment and Management","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inter-rater reliability; Agreement; Psychology; Criminology; Psychiatry; Developmental psychology; Rating scale","score_opus":0.04694335626900315,"score_gpt":0.3854166524079888,"score_spread":0.33847329613898564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403718102","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96162593,0.00031614114,0.0013859677,0.0009513559,0.00046604517,0.0005323955,0.000007959182,0.000007178182,0.03470701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928067,0.0029977153,0.0021300483,0.000044087115,0.000043737535,0.000008518286,0.0000012718064,0.000006551956,0.0019613963],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980049,0.0003152561,0.00046732966,0.00017951279,0.0008394266,0.00019356588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905306,0.00016791538,0.00029614614,0.00015172265,0.00024505507,0.00008611747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031829837,0.00012128602,0.00024200062,0.00022990323,0.00017735144,0.00040132168,0.00018604413,0.000055587523,0.000069723515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024290419,0.00007664979,0.000068809975,0.00019669015,0.00027594995,0.0007920978,0.00026318873,0.0002873313,2.7473155e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001586955,0.00073672924,0.68861425,0.0015479056,0.0019469229,0.00005501936,0.062710024,0.00009667266,0.00059822446,0.10229975,0.010187584,0.13104823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004161501,0.00022384075,0.9862732,0.0004476709,0.00025181368,0.0000034393518,0.006682679,0.00042749336,0.000031294414,0.0012000648,0.0039515723,0.00009077828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017578082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009678176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29765895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002890676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015143838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98896396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406869168","doi":"10.1037/tam0000247","title":"Assessing change in risk and protective factors: A case study and examination of the Violence Risk Scale-Youth Version, Short Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability: Adolescent Version, and a structured professional judgment approach to rating and formulating change.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Threat Assessment and Management","topic":"Youth Development and Social Support","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Scale (ratio); Term (time); Risk assessment; Psychology; Applied psychology; Environmental health; Medicine; Computer security; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.050529091949986345,"score_gpt":0.3709174191578803,"score_spread":0.32038832720789395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406869168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99634683,0.00023981291,0.00045411094,0.00008145577,0.00010844767,0.0026294289,0.000022364375,0.0000050812073,0.000112466885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964386,0.0013243273,0.0021246376,0.000013556248,0.000032626496,0.000051806877,0.0000025027443,0.000006734821,0.0000051815346],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976885,0.00067697413,0.0005409003,0.0003371368,0.00055054395,0.0002059732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989011,0.0001609806,0.0005824683,0.00010390797,0.00013873036,0.00011280439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031365391,0.00020466362,0.0004308487,0.00027727708,0.000797341,0.00013908662,0.00008752322,0.000079929014,0.0000013247967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006946689,0.0001451373,0.00003562207,0.0002875449,0.00017528946,0.0005648882,0.00043832706,0.00027680772,2.9531881e-9],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035136047,0.00020829677,0.8442877,0.00019641794,0.00008781423,0.0000061860223,0.06070156,0.0000013159703,0.000010620273,0.000053209096,8.297223e-7,0.09441092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010924351,0.0001537245,0.7862774,0.00068676914,0.00033324436,0.0000027629617,0.21086474,0.00031874582,0.000010360507,0.0001513434,0.0000017725271,0.0001066557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016917364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001160619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15016319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022563913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007861947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6132583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416423218","doi":"10.1037/tam0000262.supp","title":"Supplemental Material for Interviewing Lone Actors: The Role of Rapport, Grievance, and Ideology in the Interview of the Toronto Van Attacker","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Threat Assessment and Management","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interview; Ideology; Context (archaeology); Qualitative research; Semi-structured interview","score_opus":0.11507704001348322,"score_gpt":0.5113368483348423,"score_spread":0.39625980832135904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416423218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7251146,0.018826837,0.044424314,0.15677568,0.0032832795,0.0068043824,0.00012178988,0.000011275919,0.044637866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882897,0.0073168296,0.0036402012,0.0003324774,0.00007449269,0.000031051462,0.0000016051949,0.0000040188183,0.00030963044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764055,0.0013938064,0.00043132983,0.00008215006,0.00029972475,0.00015245876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893874,0.0005580683,0.00028119708,0.00011436024,0.00008698121,0.000020673358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009461809,0.00007300946,0.00023266749,0.00004494647,0.00015263808,0.00004864462,0.0003632612,0.00003132694,0.00007978591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055474327,0.00003450566,0.000096096664,0.00009979701,0.00036526253,0.00016123886,0.00023026571,0.00011689935,2.271564e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026624964,0.00034137166,0.028681299,0.0011164752,0.0007754072,0.000003913504,0.045196608,0.000003566111,0.0007396864,0.66992253,0.008176553,0.24477635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001974687,0.0006644132,0.084612735,0.0010701389,0.00034544876,0.0000021468175,0.3431056,0.00006954891,0.00046486722,0.1652906,0.40225637,0.000143433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036435906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002065713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50463194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000076619624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000069172725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32792932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416864028","doi":"10.1037/tam0000262","title":"Interviewing lone actors: The role of rapport, grievance, and ideology in the interview of the Toronto Van Attacker.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Threat Assessment and Management","topic":"Media Studies and Communication","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interview; Ideology; Semi-structured interview; Qualitative research; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.038975586038240466,"score_gpt":0.37437461622200724,"score_spread":0.33539903018376677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416864028","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.520717,0.13175535,0.0020134274,0.11067845,0.0014823573,0.0021265,0.0000026073094,0.0000084857,0.23121582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95133567,0.04793113,0.00015765072,0.00031855708,0.00002527435,0.000009813924,1.6086983e-7,0.0000014888062,0.00022023478],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989055,0.0004210585,0.00033951653,0.000055005698,0.0001923019,0.00008666433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927163,0.00016004404,0.00031316624,0.00019326548,0.00004972965,0.000012145307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020727834,0.000057449684,0.00018483154,0.000026861313,0.00014237587,0.000021326163,0.000461103,0.000019303588,0.000017009943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016575857,0.0000267543,0.00006402537,0.00011530348,0.0001715835,0.00010646459,0.0003256167,0.00009680666,3.757088e-8],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043916312,0.0002718193,0.13522035,0.00031366703,0.00059286534,0.0000023421198,0.03445896,0.000007066555,0.00004945318,0.26077092,0.0053882287,0.5628804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072340824,0.00016929013,0.38044596,0.0008888983,0.00033480694,0.0000014265672,0.2143021,0.000059027792,0.0000250562,0.021527654,0.38144088,0.00008150211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033964103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041649323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5627989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005233979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030103465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23241301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}