{"meta":{"query_hash":"f8d9c3f76e53","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology"},"cohort_total":21,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":21,"exported":21,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/f8d9c3f76e53","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Urban+Ecology"},"results":[{"id":"W2587907116","doi":"10.1093/jue/juw009","title":"Adaptive management in sustainable park planning and management: case study of the city of Vancouver Parks","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Urban Green Space and Health","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Business; Environmental planning; Revenue; Environmental resource management; Profit (economics); Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.021583792121721224,"score_gpt":0.27457780043790625,"score_spread":0.252994008316185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587907116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98852354,0.00020234783,0.00038213911,0.00061438343,0.000011801342,0.00011825898,0.000062114465,0.0000061011224,0.010079304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932017,0.00045059988,0.00096172164,0.00013036774,0.000007755066,0.000041504714,0.00005065641,0.0000057957545,0.005150053],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874616,0.00055760297,0.000031587027,0.00008993888,0.00023917074,0.0003355056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855655,0.00046200858,0.000103460385,0.00006586875,0.00029366647,0.00051846553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085987255,0.00030300693,0.00026698114,0.00072124274,0.0092950845,0.0025334852,0.0015297849,0.0012369002,0.0019559993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023130015,0.00030596554,0.00015639057,0.0021516965,0.0019008032,0.00053222344,0.0020273873,0.0011068,0.00019684857],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045642,0.0032156769,0.2937219,0.0008072096,0.00014002688,0.1300798,0.3310488,0.011938989,0.0046638274,0.014070236,0.013282081,0.196575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006764764,0.0005612261,0.17634296,0.00029261207,0.000052299576,0.0071795564,0.73418933,0.005990381,0.0012320245,0.001626553,0.07235928,0.0001062239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6536277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90941364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3463723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01052842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007695498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6968243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768976470","doi":"10.1093/jue/jux010","title":"A novel method for affixing Global Positioning System (GPS) tags to urban Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus): feasibility, health impacts and potential for tracking movement","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Agriculture; Ministry of Health; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Global Positioning System; Download; Telemetry; Computer science; Scale (ratio); Real-time computing; Remote sensing; Geography; Telecommunications; World Wide Web; Cartography","score_opus":0.025149864567204687,"score_gpt":0.31476158752361527,"score_spread":0.2896117229564106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768976470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9274056,0.00056022266,0.07040795,0.00014116276,0.00011047968,0.00030363855,0.0001564138,0.00014656238,0.00076804287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8101271,0.0011226543,0.18396188,0.00017321136,0.00005148498,0.00040065483,0.00032684297,0.00003699398,0.003799287],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994629,0.00006995937,0.00004563497,0.00021148477,0.00015003783,0.00005998884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992293,0.00014170547,0.00029059834,0.0001350668,0.00013722143,0.0000660464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006719653,0.0006136108,0.00023819809,0.0005953804,0.00033511745,0.00033356613,0.0006209571,0.00059727277,0.0005932375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00096119265,0.00036804678,0.0003636322,0.00030679454,0.00068075676,0.00052983314,0.0005420106,0.00043815523,0.00027488993],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002964372,0.00018308099,0.017992418,0.0001408737,0.000023399436,0.00024332436,0.00024078535,0.00025713313,0.9373882,0.00011635072,0.00012600636,0.042992033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014227271,0.0126482835,0.16608036,0.00007484878,0.00037568432,0.004600104,0.00074245414,0.0061901403,0.8002834,0.0001483065,0.008573786,0.00014042835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004691489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01294448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004691489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027550152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033528206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009328365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771430280","doi":"10.1093/jue/jux016","title":"What factors limit bat abundance and diversity in temperate, North American urban environments?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Biodiversity; Urbanization; Habitat; Urban ecology; Geography; Diversity (politics); Species diversity; Biology","score_opus":0.025421214784476412,"score_gpt":0.21286797761676604,"score_spread":0.18744676283228962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771430280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9854209,0.007550236,0.00073394866,0.0008912953,0.00001914363,0.000016994914,0.00023162964,0.00001690064,0.0051189233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959806,0.0029533308,0.00037288424,0.0002064296,0.000042115593,0.000018034178,0.00010567069,0.000008532614,0.00031225756],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993135,0.0002038107,0.000049411974,0.00017119672,0.00011701387,0.00014505602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99763155,0.00071818294,0.00087317993,0.00009084801,0.00037158717,0.00031468555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008046129,0.00021394283,0.00038074545,0.0006397671,0.0006515715,0.0015563249,0.00039231582,0.00043792182,0.0019437965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002975952,0.00029627245,0.0002294389,0.00078024704,0.0011723489,0.0011821188,0.0007769424,0.0002869244,0.00034220945],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000644074,0.000068696536,0.9653145,0.00033951548,0.00012876473,0.00016953074,0.00245302,0.0004001672,0.0018272429,0.0007520084,0.0008127599,0.027669396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017297756,0.000024425137,0.99497366,0.00007205547,0.000043174707,0.00010753961,0.0025421558,0.00015801028,0.00010886351,0.00045180196,0.0015097844,0.000006775297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01659026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08248788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01659026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006438813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009095321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032987416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897697522","doi":"10.1093/jue/juy020","title":"Bird foraging is influenced by both risk and connectivity in urban parks","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; The King's University","funders":"Goddard Space Flight Center","keywords":"Foraging; Predation; Habitat; Risk perception; Perception; Geography; Ecology; Optimal foraging theory; Resource (disambiguation); Environmental resource management; Biology; Environmental science; Computer science","score_opus":0.005720170611270162,"score_gpt":0.22806340003992337,"score_spread":0.2223432294286532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897697522","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998047,0.0000069117355,0.00011022377,0.000003467923,1.65126e-7,0.0000010131682,0.000005412469,9.4626637e-7,0.00006727071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997919,0.0000076737915,0.00015402539,0.0000020959483,3.420686e-7,0.0000021360645,0.000012672616,0.0000010093711,0.000028153017],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963784,0.00021737296,0.000014740015,0.00005897013,0.000029903595,0.00004106622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981805,0.0009784617,0.0004457047,0.00014413027,0.000077498524,0.00017372832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055025145,0.00016299047,0.00026381016,0.00038763904,0.0002762809,0.00052872876,0.00020956395,0.00019712016,0.0006200363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002079464,0.0001812692,0.00017864174,0.0002755735,0.00057319197,0.00035595812,0.00054847007,0.0002664624,0.000047807265],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075265975,0.0002787509,0.95835817,0.00006543292,0.00020976666,0.00026028074,0.0017240141,0.006291368,0.022961868,0.0004014834,0.000071679875,0.008624626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004325997,0.00015524197,0.994437,0.000004407401,0.000024224437,0.00007316863,0.00054614095,0.0039150044,0.0005614208,0.00021939652,0.000052081534,0.000007566051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035647033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01031633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035647033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023393524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011849338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007087946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901772202","doi":"10.1093/jue/juy013","title":"Changes in spontaneous flora of anthropogenic microhabitats along rural–urban gradients","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Botany and Plant Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Flora (microbiology); Environmental science; Ecology; Geography; Environmental protection; Environmental planning; Biology; Bacteria; Paleontology","score_opus":0.013735593830278307,"score_gpt":0.21857211702894597,"score_spread":0.20483652319866766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901772202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996656,0.000022878587,0.000050237868,0.0000032874625,3.042838e-7,0.0000028319732,0.000072093826,0.0000018418847,0.00018075726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997203,0.000011521393,0.000063064304,0.0000024431286,5.8327555e-7,0.0000032481316,0.00009595784,0.0000010292152,0.00010184165],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99974126,0.000050620074,0.000008243585,0.000066352906,0.000064049906,0.000069487134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932015,0.00007651026,0.00020736606,0.00004515513,0.0002148982,0.00013592059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028402088,0.00015126937,0.00019248646,0.0008731505,0.00056565297,0.0005677738,0.00023476218,0.00012146843,0.0010475348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062409986,0.00011390157,0.00012925363,0.0008758231,0.00065991736,0.00013964328,0.0003789394,0.00014566659,0.00008532616],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011847698,0.000021182803,0.9838664,0.000018175222,0.000048839887,0.000051999607,0.0007541568,0.00025481245,0.011349687,0.00005449611,0.00007805143,0.0033837778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.891778e-7,0.000005388104,0.99974567,4.5539085e-7,9.982352e-7,0.0000067123415,0.000106049316,0.00004400938,0.000049342303,0.0000019117294,0.00003820022,6.987206e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26233786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5123473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26233786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014959081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006061265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52162176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903937117","doi":"10.1093/jue/juy026","title":"Interacting effects of urbanization and coastal gradients on ant thermal responses","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Urban Green Space and Health","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University at Buffalo; New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation","keywords":"Urbanization; Woodland; Foraging; Ecology; Phenology; Environmental science; Spring (device); Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.00860217562573204,"score_gpt":0.25101224281120604,"score_spread":0.242410067185474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903937117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99933064,0.00004940524,0.00014722472,0.000010010697,0.0000013670656,0.0000031543254,0.00005151653,0.000004032878,0.00040282178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99958795,0.00003031017,0.00017368965,0.000009194852,0.0000012588713,0.00000551554,0.000052348758,0.0000033450126,0.00013630066],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997707,0.00009016279,0.000011558667,0.000060483322,0.00003078604,0.00003639326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951947,0.00015303624,0.00013987684,0.00004291031,0.000052719155,0.00009205913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019500343,0.00017708658,0.00020801,0.00025230096,0.00026344723,0.00043355234,0.00011620476,0.00009937934,0.0009425392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051573495,0.00013357989,0.00019830251,0.0003063152,0.00034558398,0.0001781408,0.00048705,0.0001986761,0.000064685526],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074636145,0.00009799646,0.94138455,0.000057023022,0.00018870336,0.00015247992,0.00041382058,0.00086071744,0.046888478,0.00022228327,0.0001656567,0.008821937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017287929,0.000028424567,0.99901664,0.0000013599093,0.000013395774,0.000015363868,0.0001350646,0.0002626203,0.00037688034,0.00002299498,0.0001233983,0.0000020585035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009108909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0388103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009108909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003042018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025574685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018111765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911646408","doi":"10.1093/jue/juz001","title":"Conducting urban ecology research on private property: advice for new urban ecologists","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Private property; Property (philosophy); Work (physics); Space (punctuation); Sample (material); Environmental planning; Business; Environmental resource management; Public relations; Geography; Engineering; Political science; Computer science; Environmental science; Law","score_opus":0.08086914876207894,"score_gpt":0.3146257122729893,"score_spread":0.23375656351091034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911646408","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063243737,0.013512825,0.016489085,0.9291566,0.01151854,0.0013244185,0.00054803665,0.0011669552,0.019959006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.059190318,0.04703078,0.286451,0.49232006,0.012689032,0.00905792,0.0014589415,0.0013986904,0.090403266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810168,0.0121035,0.002097185,0.0006150475,0.0030406178,0.0011268792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83905303,0.081478655,0.003947312,0.0059160087,0.04620535,0.023399575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025867783,0.0014592335,0.0021407064,0.003953114,0.0054037315,0.0040001,0.004578582,0.009990496,0.0141898515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0723175,0.0016898634,0.0017615653,0.0035250862,0.005954712,0.015769737,0.004294989,0.01758749,0.008151555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003559036,0.00022798836,0.0036686275,0.0007863449,0.000017048633,0.00095356046,0.019756913,0.00021586491,0.00067656836,0.0020500529,0.9230313,0.04858015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004982631,0.00007582809,0.0036948794,0.0015756964,0.000028120176,0.0009995187,0.049800307,0.0003361104,0.00024244541,0.010154366,0.9329241,0.0001188466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025490748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11337415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025867783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003771235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01870558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13680351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967273322","doi":"10.1093/jue/juz013","title":"An urban wildlife habitat experiment: conservation implications of altering management regimes on animals and plants along urban and rural rights-of-way","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Alberta","funders":"Manitoba Hydro; University of Manitoba","keywords":"Cirsium arvense; Geography; Wildlife; Thistle; Habitat; Agroforestry; Vegetation (pathology); Weed control; Ecology; Agronomy; Biology","score_opus":0.00916797756750857,"score_gpt":0.24301108779824376,"score_spread":0.2338431102307352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2967273322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995881,0.000007521831,0.0000927555,0.00001210193,0.0000045529414,0.00003988809,0.00005510733,0.0000062978047,0.00019377959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975829,0.000017822078,0.0010753322,0.00005758658,0.000006373514,0.000271421,0.00016925379,0.0000062983,0.00081289443],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995628,0.000113390975,0.000028601511,0.00016260207,0.000055579945,0.00007701778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868876,0.00022906037,0.00045626482,0.00019115288,0.00006839767,0.00036639962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004692587,0.0003337557,0.0003689528,0.0003048062,0.00055604335,0.000401962,0.0007421163,0.0003388192,0.0018106987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043943452,0.00027956814,0.00028693423,0.00024981372,0.0008864741,0.0003311659,0.00048560067,0.0007796186,0.00011070223],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.039253898,0.04589671,0.08543572,0.00027014368,0.00031026523,0.00030638158,0.0012625701,0.0019373443,0.80461454,0.0006873511,0.0007108655,0.019314222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002458081,0.10932429,0.76277006,0.000026401127,0.0003353913,0.00014038131,0.0016209788,0.006063351,0.11411192,0.00036971338,0.0027064343,0.00007294599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003832067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011466964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003832067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077541394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044561885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0076195598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2976557596","doi":"10.1093/jue/juz015","title":"Male and female bats differ in their use of a large urban park","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Urbanization; Foraging; Geography; Wildlife; Predation; Urban park; Habitat; Ecology; Urban ecology; Eptesicus fuscus; National park; Biology; Environmental planning","score_opus":0.022301143515233712,"score_gpt":0.2123873183391523,"score_spread":0.1900861748239186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2976557596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992004,0.00003737736,0.00002817046,0.000011596646,8.5849894e-7,0.000001873579,0.00005434806,9.552062e-7,0.00066446484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995666,0.000026250102,0.000032846343,0.0000043401587,7.198734e-7,0.0000013367144,0.00004584683,7.296488e-7,0.0003214131],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998994,0.000014925866,0.000005370335,0.000024276287,0.000026562166,0.000029475219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997023,0.00004140468,0.00010764751,0.000014649536,0.00004002339,0.00009402578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001380208,0.000081219965,0.00007669697,0.00035572407,0.00026894297,0.0004784491,0.00010573292,0.00013727843,0.0027996302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004767601,0.00008815257,0.00006708866,0.00021761164,0.00031823126,0.00020962751,0.00026633765,0.00009821584,0.0002594292],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083088395,0.000020809097,0.9895962,0.00001118381,0.000025680029,0.00009068053,0.0016388578,0.000041592186,0.004118803,0.00011720628,0.00013658416,0.004119357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.9200918e-7,0.0000114187305,0.9989699,0.0000017920406,0.0000016487056,0.000055718294,0.00076825975,0.000025354298,0.000043837976,0.000008420745,0.00011236518,9.315e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018597996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09687502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018597996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028189644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017272303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036979496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007844613","doi":"10.1093/jue/juaa006","title":"Road salt impact on soil electrical conductivity across an urban landscape","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Smart Materials for Construction","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"University of Wisconsin-Madison; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Environmental science; Soil water; Surface runoff; Throughflow; Hydrology (agriculture); Land cover; Impervious surface; Land use; Soil science; Ecology; Geology","score_opus":0.013654419797123424,"score_gpt":0.2626074486054812,"score_spread":0.24895302880835776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007844613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996406,0.000008956553,0.00008238752,0.0000035175428,3.503049e-7,0.0000011290836,0.00006640403,0.0000037916946,0.00019280096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998877,0.0000052096693,0.000033148186,9.237143e-7,2.562104e-7,8.646829e-7,0.000038294365,8.359488e-7,0.000032823635],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998559,0.000034357916,0.000009700527,0.000040725536,0.000029947565,0.000029415136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964786,0.000095136485,0.0000943882,0.000032788266,0.00009124057,0.000038538008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011247322,0.00014142497,0.00016443989,0.00050130783,0.00024280144,0.00063728873,0.0001630057,0.00015147218,0.00084258534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004352122,0.00007832346,0.00010230474,0.0009641139,0.000368104,0.0002699343,0.00039487102,0.00009951096,0.00010384619],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000424346,0.0001408175,0.94285244,0.000082582206,0.00013607988,0.0004365525,0.00058599113,0.008461932,0.030074349,0.00023073408,0.0001724878,0.01640163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003451587,0.00009264199,0.9942251,0.000003315012,0.000023232813,0.00008306822,0.000652023,0.0025178273,0.002069755,0.00009878481,0.00022359822,0.0000072304942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066650817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012772005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066650817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030653254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015864015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013252556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165479629","doi":"10.1093/jue/juab013","title":"Stakeholder perspectives on the development and implementation of approaches to municipal rat management","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Government of British Columbia; BC Centre for Disease Control; Ministry of Agriculture; University of Saskatchewan; Canadian Science Centre for Human and Animal Health","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Stakeholder; Urbanization; Focus group; Thematic analysis; Environmental planning; Scale (ratio); Process management; Conceptual framework; Environmental resource management; Public relations; Qualitative research; Political science; Marketing; Geography; Economic growth; Sociology","score_opus":0.12070896952637157,"score_gpt":0.27913141616756626,"score_spread":0.1584224466411947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165479629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9048202,0.00071676716,0.016079577,0.04459605,0.00014737976,0.00033688365,0.00005348819,0.00004711528,0.033202544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964978,0.00020659177,0.0019182321,0.00072449225,0.0000062588338,0.00007015128,0.000011793463,0.000005604115,0.0005590797],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95820045,0.034264594,0.00096356834,0.0006837902,0.0020027894,0.0038847495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9790692,0.009568715,0.0026117782,0.0007453498,0.0040214434,0.003983527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03197052,0.0003928916,0.00027022426,0.001061402,0.008404557,0.0051529696,0.0019013425,0.0024711415,0.0019417993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03016352,0.0003558777,0.0004300995,0.0011725359,0.0050759776,0.003724698,0.008233983,0.0019063798,0.00012346319],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013865107,0.0002893679,0.046138752,0.0006863576,0.00006718439,0.0027942618,0.81253135,0.002786639,0.004393887,0.056590877,0.0057510342,0.067831635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016519645,0.0001761951,0.011242159,0.00058060134,0.000031417767,0.00018317845,0.9214676,0.0020256108,0.00090405403,0.008589136,0.054727234,0.000056334517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01810922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03241052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03197052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00959805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018086413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16907829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189670387","doi":"10.1093/jue/juab021","title":"Comparison of beaver density and foraging preferences between urban and rural riparian forests along the South Saskatchewan River, Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Ecology and biodiversity studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Global Institute for Water Security; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Beaver; Riparian zone; Foraging; Geography; Transect; Habitat; Ecology; Riparian forest; Agroforestry; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.01617970947875474,"score_gpt":0.21955551725129407,"score_spread":0.20337580777253933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189670387","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99837697,0.000059404112,0.00006304934,0.00004019046,0.0000016422206,0.0000109996645,0.0004652466,0.0000034217546,0.0009789754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99817157,0.00012252101,0.00018094554,0.000032984797,8.5210627e-7,0.000011868548,0.00040235897,0.000002616829,0.0010742744],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997867,0.000029532557,0.00001266355,0.000054157303,0.00005012669,0.00006682988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903786,0.00013344246,0.0001540881,0.000039374634,0.0004051435,0.00023009256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021394077,0.0001953006,0.0002002856,0.0009994269,0.0013632708,0.0007437585,0.0004844783,0.00017252499,0.0018248586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065857155,0.00016663388,0.00017590719,0.0019004685,0.0005895762,0.00021649245,0.00041319084,0.0002225778,0.000210132],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004327643,0.000023961955,0.9920294,0.000020985872,0.00003715327,0.00012542051,0.0011723978,0.00018685267,0.0010200292,0.000081854945,0.00047269624,0.004785949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020839036,0.00000698251,0.99720085,0.000011404501,0.000005965883,0.000026665675,0.002176224,0.0001643808,0.00006284451,0.000017122095,0.0003211956,0.0000042590923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9693745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99546164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030625522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00620651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00640627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061611712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204589214","doi":"10.1093/jue/juab029","title":"Occurrence of a forest-dwelling bat, northern myotis (<i>Myotis septentrionalis</i>), within Canada’s largest conurbation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Zoo","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Ecology; Geography; Habitat; Conurbation; Population; Urban ecology; Foraging; Biology","score_opus":0.012738544833055327,"score_gpt":0.19445396615542251,"score_spread":0.18171542132236718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204589214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999158,0.000043360953,0.000052954965,0.000012482619,9.625526e-7,0.000004369793,0.00013623972,0.0000027520805,0.0005888474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994112,0.00004040312,0.00013865026,0.000009064355,7.83814e-7,0.00000296728,0.00011222212,7.980219e-7,0.0002837724],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998802,0.000007576983,0.000005046637,0.000037770486,0.00003390584,0.00003561033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953675,0.000024978668,0.0001283844,0.000015831472,0.00014793522,0.00014611137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013670094,0.0001174322,0.00013501645,0.000502591,0.0014154272,0.00047297298,0.00022670571,0.00012518057,0.00088362914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030904793,0.00010131488,0.00009791267,0.00045992676,0.00044311266,0.0001400954,0.00033965163,0.00017306524,0.00008020425],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004887157,0.000013666932,0.9862563,0.000024861187,0.000020076639,0.00020732293,0.0014216119,0.000081978375,0.0061862706,0.000047270747,0.00024000344,0.005451657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.4029044e-7,0.000010376654,0.9985421,0.000005373407,0.000004130682,0.000077963596,0.00090215175,0.00008790998,0.0001271684,0.000004317975,0.00023596622,0.0000020623977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.843782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9605948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15621799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025603347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026768784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31427592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214437232","doi":"10.1093/jue/juab034","title":"Inter-population differences in coyote diet and niche width along an urban–suburban–rural gradient","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Alberta Museum; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Generalist and specialist species; Geography; Niche; Ecology; Wildlife; Habitat; Ecological niche; Predation; Population; Urban ecology; Biology; Environmental health","score_opus":0.01060857153201707,"score_gpt":0.22946099641169715,"score_spread":0.21885242487968007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214437232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99960274,0.000030926047,0.000067008325,0.0000053460567,7.1479525e-7,0.00000271879,0.000099961675,0.0000016209636,0.00018901387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995628,0.000017461274,0.00010439811,0.0000059751733,6.183838e-7,0.00000303509,0.00014454447,0.0000011305107,0.0001600256],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99986756,0.000016535718,0.0000052327186,0.000048426384,0.000026440235,0.000035761866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996557,0.00004255632,0.00008783983,0.000027269441,0.000105687424,0.000080869075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001955613,0.00013053435,0.00017536643,0.0007263,0.0005093405,0.00044064512,0.00024620304,0.00015479805,0.0009949437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038103247,0.00011471603,0.0001054144,0.00060912874,0.0004282621,0.00011436204,0.000299132,0.00018475742,0.000086049055],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009290364,0.000019829698,0.99257505,0.000007993544,0.00005279837,0.00002874323,0.00048402615,0.000079090525,0.0044251126,0.000041698015,0.00011105174,0.0020815404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.751687e-7,0.000006146463,0.9996283,0.0000010856314,0.000003133154,0.0000098932605,0.00021988955,0.000049035643,0.00003062284,0.000003759455,0.000047110057,6.212825e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19501467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19501467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070028147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039880915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3877591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285243330","doi":"10.1093/jue/juac009","title":"The impact of urbanization on outcrossing rate and population genetic variation in the native wildflower, <i>Impatiens capensis</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biology; Outcrossing; Wildflower; Genetic diversity; Ecology; Population; Habitat fragmentation; Genetic variation; Biodiversity; Pollen; Demography","score_opus":0.019961589601571263,"score_gpt":0.22698756608941995,"score_spread":0.20702597648784868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285243330","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999801,0.000012192803,0.000020699854,0.0000030375827,2.7309918e-7,0.0000011789016,0.00002927508,5.7279135e-7,0.00013189255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998154,0.000010358247,0.000042100313,0.0000031411219,4.0442478e-7,0.0000014210008,0.000048914873,5.9836947e-7,0.00007774926],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998683,0.000028589877,0.0000064997625,0.00004363229,0.000028579409,0.000024304256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961746,0.00010789047,0.00012314782,0.00003083247,0.00005057646,0.00007020962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023949976,0.00018673003,0.00011705879,0.0005927964,0.00043541135,0.0002929508,0.00024211993,0.00009459413,0.0009172003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051677495,0.00008411226,0.00014269953,0.0003107257,0.00032985417,0.000119831915,0.00020971606,0.00017866593,0.000049310736],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002498215,0.00008273834,0.93209064,0.000022939046,0.00008855686,0.00038733537,0.0012101616,0.000583774,0.05735546,0.00014260758,0.00015060826,0.0076354113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011339262,0.000013799906,0.9993486,0.0000014874634,0.0000042832144,0.000022478596,0.00008305885,0.00017670587,0.0002820807,0.0000058008177,0.000059388814,0.0000011720203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09093551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17208162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09093551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010872218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022700636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18081248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4363610960","doi":"10.1093/jue/juad002","title":"Urban wildlife and arborists: environmental governance and the protection of wildlife during tree care operations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Urban Green Space and Health","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Wildlife conservation; Environmental planning; Legislation; Work (physics); North American Model of Wildlife Conservation; Wildlife management; Urban forestry; Best practice; Business; Arboriculture; Environmental resource management; Geography; Political science; Agroforestry; Ecology; Engineering; Environmental science","score_opus":0.007176282216232793,"score_gpt":0.2086641777391842,"score_spread":0.2014878955229514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4363610960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9859343,0.000272456,0.00020779792,0.0013061268,0.0000105646695,0.0000074214718,0.000049249877,0.000003656868,0.012208449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988997,0.00018584995,0.00012572599,0.00010779183,0.000008307186,0.0000055008727,0.000025191233,0.0000017753471,0.00064014277],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990735,0.00046638862,0.00003674467,0.00008707841,0.00012912629,0.00020708883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963922,0.00089948636,0.0014967141,0.000111396876,0.00023945732,0.0008607456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009111289,0.00007522188,0.00009049769,0.0004300458,0.0010616942,0.0013959941,0.0003036906,0.00026922108,0.0052275346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028218962,0.00008783087,0.00010898439,0.00048180282,0.0014661938,0.0007999208,0.001494532,0.00050706347,0.00020169203],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045847468,0.0001400768,0.92078114,0.00012436419,0.000042898442,0.00046375184,0.03085635,0.00025541708,0.0005468988,0.002040806,0.0035629459,0.041139465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039620845,0.00007042494,0.89699936,0.0002035428,0.000013963612,0.00020892643,0.08967422,0.00019409599,0.0000937838,0.0007244587,0.011800489,0.0000127934745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012597855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06822899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012597855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009950242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010136936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02504909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378470877","doi":"10.1093/jue/juad006","title":"Bee–plant interaction and community response along an urbanization gradient","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; York University","keywords":"Pollinator; Species richness; Urbanization; Ecology; Generalist and specialist species; Impervious surface; Plant community; Geography; Urban ecology; Halictidae; Habitat; Abundance (ecology); Native plant; Biology; Pollination; Apoidea; Introduced species; Pollen","score_opus":0.06276619049428449,"score_gpt":0.24585359726815764,"score_spread":0.18308740677387314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378470877","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997098,0.00001662486,0.000024159448,0.0000061980472,3.6392458e-7,0.0000025961199,0.000068761605,0.0000011015236,0.0001703144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99975044,0.000014184599,0.000045206038,0.0000032840783,5.0896796e-7,0.0000026205985,0.000085176944,4.304586e-7,0.000098262986],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998914,0.000026873902,0.0000040975365,0.000022975244,0.000025863315,0.000028812387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970335,0.000036798247,0.00010509081,0.000013820547,0.000071218754,0.000069625654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000115344985,0.00008124352,0.00010976043,0.0004419374,0.00040069147,0.0003737247,0.00010933152,0.00010348282,0.00094095466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032816635,0.000090546884,0.000083967374,0.00048934185,0.00028265212,0.00012486416,0.00028117438,0.00015091928,0.00007730458],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011635327,0.000028225755,0.9892846,0.000011755164,0.00002792055,0.00008155485,0.00061627943,0.00012731296,0.0072103776,0.000033627104,0.0001286763,0.0023332478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.506486e-7,0.0000070273395,0.99959415,6.457822e-7,0.0000012011656,0.000009424278,0.00026183232,0.00004716815,0.00003496815,0.0000023105406,0.00004053662,5.2942767e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10643151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30520907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10643151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007934856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036677782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21162403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383750086","doi":"10.1093/jue/juad015","title":"Range-wide site-occupancy modeling of Red-winged Blackbirds (<i>Agelaius phoeniceus</i>)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"University of Massachusetts Boston","keywords":"Occupancy; Habitat; Urbanization; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Land cover; Habitat destruction; Urban ecology; Population; Disturbance (geology); Land use; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.015212764770479434,"score_gpt":0.2292391935385067,"score_spread":0.21402642876802724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383750086","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99203897,0.000117957825,0.0067309737,0.00008106473,0.000009314094,0.000007766054,0.0006188493,0.000065558,0.00032946642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99746335,0.000027882004,0.0017713924,0.000013534154,0.000006037674,0.0000075042535,0.00050389225,0.00000916242,0.00019726054],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997955,0.00006528421,0.000008152216,0.000080324855,0.000013152687,0.00003769478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996296,0.00016183042,0.00006364262,0.000043052318,0.000044110155,0.00005780999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009011895,0.00028653155,0.00036466465,0.00051540614,0.00023618173,0.0005591737,0.0011041851,0.0004974913,0.001121754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009688253,0.00028842242,0.0008821877,0.00030259753,0.00029718876,0.00034062998,0.0003774128,0.0003839314,0.00020641008],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015225771,0.0001566875,0.26341224,0.000036790538,0.00022269104,0.0001328602,0.00010402381,0.7264375,0.0012011444,0.0007419249,0.00070676516,0.0066951336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067474966,0.000020200807,0.024226854,0.0000038706507,0.000011974965,0.00002310997,0.00004333516,0.97521245,0.00008612113,0.00018961987,0.00017072991,0.0000050062245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05018661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03559171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05018661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005360203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033633676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099788964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399979557","doi":"10.1093/jue/juae014","title":"Exploring differences in neophobia and anti-predator behaviour between urban and rural mountain chickadees","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Neophobia; Predator; Ecology; Geography; Predation; Zoology; Biology","score_opus":0.05490875273549468,"score_gpt":0.28105401863719054,"score_spread":0.22614526590169587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399979557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997633,0.00002323374,0.000023531522,0.000003877131,4.9282687e-7,0.0000029218877,0.000029366503,0.0000013594339,0.00015196999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99911493,0.000026424817,0.00019997213,0.0000144866635,7.874261e-7,0.000008936088,0.00005752763,0.0000015232137,0.0005753666],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99994135,0.00001219369,0.0000026350467,0.00002295423,0.000005702991,0.000015166003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997274,0.000045506917,0.00006944471,0.00001863794,0.000030008323,0.00010884896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011797015,0.00027805482,0.00018203756,0.00044665928,0.0002906894,0.00026857757,0.0001355553,0.00022702366,0.0021025164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022139844,0.00014498232,0.00013429177,0.00010525298,0.00029999448,0.00014383187,0.00022606678,0.0003212843,0.00022172884],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015469284,0.0007746852,0.619079,0.00014854781,0.00010372337,0.00056765706,0.0046952497,0.00017909848,0.36307913,0.00020272484,0.0002157361,0.009407594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036576282,0.0003426766,0.99742484,0.0000028623508,0.000007186958,0.00011243678,0.0008149101,0.00006977784,0.0009923325,0.00001192038,0.00021342756,0.000003947186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055258204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021306887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055258204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019579638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006571627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010987341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411439219","doi":"10.1093/jue/juaf006","title":"A comparative analysis of metacommunities reveals contrasting drivers of alpha and beta diversity in urban butterflies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Butterfly; Species richness; Ecology; Beta diversity; Urban ecology; Biodiversity; Impervious surface; Alpha diversity; Gamma diversity; Nestedness; Geography; Metacommunity; Biology; Species diversity; Urbanization; Biological dispersal; Population","score_opus":0.06073509773826453,"score_gpt":0.25058789087131506,"score_spread":0.18985279313305053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411439219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998123,0.000015076576,0.00005565567,0.000002659928,1.3209889e-7,5.9461996e-7,0.000038132916,0.0000013525082,0.000074110845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99982786,0.000008153584,0.00005592075,0.0000021539959,6.361785e-7,0.000001526436,0.00006511949,9.677426e-7,0.000037696645],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99985456,0.000030285946,0.000008241014,0.000043234464,0.000020796615,0.000042968273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993629,0.00017395617,0.00023271404,0.00005251476,0.00007386315,0.00010415053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021698241,0.00014088806,0.00016361814,0.0014400224,0.00026905478,0.00041396316,0.00014639596,0.00015369586,0.0010747982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006845976,0.00012683074,0.00018520173,0.0007056829,0.00027576744,0.0002732333,0.00047472236,0.00013671514,0.00009820339],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009183531,0.000014724817,0.98789024,0.000010906455,0.000067039335,0.000038751947,0.0004882337,0.00018442175,0.0076282197,0.00006755972,0.0000404908,0.003477504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.174039e-7,0.0000102890535,0.9993179,0.0000010761555,0.0000045566053,0.00002410711,0.00023354082,0.00024482852,0.000106283616,0.000020240757,0.000035439618,0.0000012180551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050706514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011910369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050706514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018598177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000071916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0100823045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7083286891","doi":"10.1093/jue/juaf014","title":"Attraction to birdseed by non-target wildlife and implications for management of urban coyotes (<i>Canis latrans</i>)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Attraction; Wildlife; Mammal; Human–wildlife conflict; Predation; Rodent; Charadriiformes; Urban ecology","score_opus":0.008431336618187091,"score_gpt":0.2447538570371294,"score_spread":0.2363225204189423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7083286891","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994617,0.00004916696,0.00001737178,0.000045689176,0.000001278822,0.000007113268,0.000020466696,0.0000013318827,0.0003958015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995295,0.000044371947,0.000111311325,0.000027333428,0.0000015351676,0.0000086706505,0.000032190746,4.35694e-7,0.00024471228],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998549,0.000033498123,0.0000049720056,0.000025909127,0.000021287262,0.00005930059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994367,0.00005550461,0.0001771813,0.000011354855,0.00007606408,0.00024327487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024183937,0.00014450576,0.00010783958,0.0002675823,0.00072736834,0.00041987578,0.00037563656,0.00020521166,0.0010984003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045087098,0.000081114005,0.00009646416,0.00015499139,0.00039091287,0.00016170947,0.0003056798,0.00023619189,0.00006542613],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001493404,0.00047929047,0.9825896,0.000050784158,0.000025119778,0.000250648,0.0008137179,0.0001602071,0.004989708,0.000060219347,0.0005967529,0.009834557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030358817,0.00014702884,0.9977489,0.00001010092,0.0000061508067,0.000030459581,0.0015298856,0.00012174307,0.00018163538,0.000008666048,0.00021031385,0.0000020657749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13946041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.52077514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13946041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014136073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084107165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27729732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}