{"meta":{"query_hash":"f8d9c3f76e53","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology"},"cohort_total":21,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":21,"exported":21,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/f8d9c3f76e53","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Urban+Ecology"},"results":[{"id":"W2587907116","doi":"10.1093/jue/juw009","title":"Adaptive management in sustainable park planning and management: case study of the city of Vancouver Parks","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Urban Green Space and Health","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Business; Environmental planning; Revenue; Environmental resource management; Profit (economics); Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.021583792121721224,"score_gpt":0.27457780043790625,"score_spread":0.252994008316185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587907116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941595,0.00005261639,0.000018028299,0.000105703686,0.00012956766,0.00037798396,5.6012516e-7,8.6861434e-7,0.0051551717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998043,0.000033668734,0.00021042964,0.0000606536,0.000014545661,0.0000042134475,2.0057435e-8,0.0000046198693,0.0016288187],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990253,0.00009610228,0.00036149277,0.00011984252,0.00017578008,0.00022149815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988646,0.00004125971,0.00076339254,0.0002620666,0.000017012862,0.000051657113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067595707,0.000080538484,0.0002517978,0.00007786625,0.00019244179,0.00000909847,0.0003032094,0.000040140792,0.0000744026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015508873,0.00005803721,0.000035637942,0.00007506018,0.00018224314,0.00018438871,0.0004647046,0.00016814316,5.8050534e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009938201,0.00032496633,0.98737293,0.000035704037,0.00006896678,0.003035387,0.0023865101,0.0002859348,0.0000018727063,0.0000992336,0.005869174,0.00041993885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014217962,0.0006605293,0.96970487,0.000023634004,0.00006634808,0.00008708989,0.026688622,0.00005935293,0.000004446938,0.00026152906,0.0009702241,0.00005156572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018182717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021882303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024302112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001416662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010871782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768976470","doi":"10.1093/jue/jux010","title":"A novel method for affixing Global Positioning System (GPS) tags to urban Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus): feasibility, health impacts and potential for tracking movement","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Agriculture; Ministry of Health; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Global Positioning System; Download; Telemetry; Computer science; Scale (ratio); Real-time computing; Remote sensing; Geography; Telecommunications; World Wide Web; Cartography","score_opus":0.025149864567204687,"score_gpt":0.31476158752361527,"score_spread":0.2896117229564106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768976470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79612416,0.00004197832,0.19280332,0.0090039605,0.0009111552,0.00094452634,0.00005160349,0.000009295016,0.00011001336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9478348,0.0000030970023,0.04883568,0.0028735497,0.0003348628,0.000032604446,0.000003153148,0.0000121128605,0.00007014385],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983007,0.00012539008,0.00062914647,0.000305126,0.00016586007,0.00047379165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981195,0.00020210877,0.0011024125,0.00020795334,0.000090757116,0.00027731646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021535265,0.00016833714,0.00044346988,0.00005526149,0.001037252,0.00012646364,0.0003086094,0.000142971,0.000028038263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034725288,0.00015721338,0.00014100951,0.000058425165,0.000087331144,0.00044810117,0.00011915476,0.00013866874,0.0000052283563],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00087807106,0.00029344423,0.9631564,0.00013539527,0.0001309491,0.000017564827,0.00064483564,0.0029292807,0.013806723,0.00084923324,0.014476315,0.0026818092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002230196,0.0018113396,0.99012965,0.00007335102,0.000072363364,0.00027622722,0.00023452981,0.0040750145,0.00024881947,0.00043885718,0.00025233574,0.0001573082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013056597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015135464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15171064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011210241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013853904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79778093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771430280","doi":"10.1093/jue/jux016","title":"What factors limit bat abundance and diversity in temperate, North American urban environments?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Biodiversity; Urbanization; Habitat; Urban ecology; Geography; Diversity (politics); Species diversity; Biology","score_opus":0.025421214784476412,"score_gpt":0.21286797761676604,"score_spread":0.18744676283228962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771430280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955466,0.00031522027,9.274659e-8,0.003427553,0.0005852763,0.000062461884,0.000005645469,0.0000032994733,0.000053886662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99691325,0.00219192,0.000010451893,0.0004476718,0.00014804145,0.0000012570734,0.0000022600705,6.170411e-7,0.0002845057],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912614,0.0001027425,0.0002438567,0.00018254048,0.00006359873,0.0002811294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991034,0.00022547333,0.0005014426,0.000059449634,0.00002285207,0.00008737848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021839084,0.00012867972,0.00038377562,0.000022632568,0.00085803185,0.00004815358,0.00037687697,0.00010284622,0.00006148156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000120306555,0.000053484546,0.00006381654,0.000048355017,0.0007702025,0.00045358916,0.00039511968,0.00026700343,0.0000076245865],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058962552,0.00008105453,0.99559546,0.0000010425481,0.00004655036,0.000028265891,0.00029535065,7.8321176e-7,0.0007446074,0.0000073523447,0.0011972574,0.0019433103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023984483,0.00087509764,0.9922817,0.0000050136705,0.000017565448,0.000018166545,0.00090012926,0.0000011754194,0.0000741252,0.000038598693,0.00544755,0.0001010692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011419627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02257301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022458814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050583807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006174708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897697522","doi":"10.1093/jue/juy020","title":"Bird foraging is influenced by both risk and connectivity in urban parks","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; The King's University","funders":"Goddard Space Flight Center","keywords":"Foraging; Predation; Habitat; Risk perception; Perception; Geography; Ecology; Optimal foraging theory; Resource (disambiguation); Environmental resource management; Biology; Environmental science; Computer science","score_opus":0.005720170611270162,"score_gpt":0.22806340003992337,"score_spread":0.2223432294286532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897697522","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99799985,0.000039800514,0.00023066142,0.0010652809,0.00020782779,0.000056439134,0.0000019460267,0.000008045363,0.0003901403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99792147,0.000044291246,0.0002590687,0.0015825212,0.00007511622,0.000002190738,1.1788091e-7,0.000008669566,0.000106544154],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992522,0.00009249762,0.00028290792,0.0001243083,0.00008835581,0.00015973549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939185,0.00012442675,0.00031807402,0.000083296334,0.000019686473,0.00006265849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038688563,0.00007312483,0.0001511058,0.00006904327,0.000093585906,0.000021194994,0.00009695557,0.00006500198,0.000693231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013479531,0.00006453594,0.0000309763,0.00013006503,0.0001696663,0.00040745648,0.000048451926,0.00021373492,0.00004571878],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036109017,0.000049634393,0.92775303,8.327651e-7,0.0000090266185,0.0000039673723,0.0005371693,0.000011870628,0.0023089016,0.0000072796165,0.06740012,0.0018820756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047976922,0.00040565524,0.9643681,0.000009036573,0.000012314365,0.000054393924,0.00012706993,0.0011002278,0.00044842355,0.00039091907,0.03253009,0.0000739865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077942386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019718998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0366151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001465334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017036546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75903934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901772202","doi":"10.1093/jue/juy013","title":"Changes in spontaneous flora of anthropogenic microhabitats along rural–urban gradients","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Botany and Plant Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Flora (microbiology); Environmental science; Ecology; Geography; Environmental protection; Environmental planning; Biology; Bacteria; Paleontology","score_opus":0.013735593830278307,"score_gpt":0.21857211702894597,"score_spread":0.20483652319866766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901772202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960607,0.0006730586,1.5513986e-7,0.001990099,0.0010337756,0.00009757694,0.000025575411,0.000006021639,0.00011298851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99852055,0.00036210776,0.00004887635,0.00032576706,0.0006187817,0.0000016390682,0.0000037208588,0.0000010725774,0.00011750807],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878734,0.00015591209,0.0004725714,0.00012832115,0.00010655435,0.0003492981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893695,0.00040151385,0.00038137706,0.00004014867,0.00016845683,0.00007156968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040460314,0.00013438221,0.00046350568,0.000056620232,0.00012210906,0.000006985329,0.0002797744,0.00016522683,0.00044256597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000117789794,0.00005713692,0.00010222704,0.00023601622,0.00037213074,0.00007256821,0.00006329774,0.00019072878,0.000021025913],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027807854,0.00020241468,0.9271382,0.000006383889,0.0000810359,0.0005345899,0.00044150834,5.8128643e-7,0.06208167,0.000028968478,0.0062338365,0.0029727526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003425742,0.003032463,0.9861427,0.000029892306,0.00002966859,0.0013620366,0.00070120435,0.000003991445,0.0024101709,0.00017662997,0.005654707,0.00011398852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008694664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060655564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06056862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004961886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016189593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95648503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903937117","doi":"10.1093/jue/juy026","title":"Interacting effects of urbanization and coastal gradients on ant thermal responses","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Urban Green Space and Health","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University at Buffalo; New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation","keywords":"Urbanization; Woodland; Foraging; Ecology; Phenology; Environmental science; Spring (device); Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.00860217562573204,"score_gpt":0.25101224281120604,"score_spread":0.242410067185474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903937117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998673,0.000028621527,0.000045009347,0.00030148574,0.00042280403,0.00007343116,0.0000010052353,0.0000028811871,0.00045175082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988576,0.00001648398,0.0002530852,0.00033928122,0.00018364523,4.5932237e-7,2.5093908e-7,0.0000072700786,0.00034188098],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992389,0.00013090175,0.00025234374,0.000090921145,0.0001306418,0.00015629268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907655,0.0003525439,0.00039423475,0.00007063111,0.000027927708,0.000078108795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029983427,0.00006976675,0.00017373348,0.00007927213,0.00007856865,0.000006290075,0.00009018515,0.000050226594,0.0001783055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002733231,0.000054854852,0.000029475998,0.00008755492,0.00018316317,0.00014069497,0.00005955322,0.00013118568,0.000028597],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035331468,0.0001074413,0.9721888,0.000011120538,0.000014308434,0.00002468936,0.0010165392,0.000006518983,0.018249316,0.00003231709,0.0069908625,0.0010048099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059329893,0.003845605,0.9899235,0.00004217955,0.00001850083,0.00007039325,0.00006959804,0.00008131352,0.004028555,0.000053975757,0.0012206858,0.000052446314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046673493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039540874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017734686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066280656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002093071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2236916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911646408","doi":"10.1093/jue/juz001","title":"Conducting urban ecology research on private property: advice for new urban ecologists","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Private property; Property (philosophy); Work (physics); Space (punctuation); Sample (material); Environmental planning; Business; Environmental resource management; Public relations; Geography; Engineering; Political science; Computer science; Environmental science; Law","score_opus":0.08086914876207894,"score_gpt":0.3146257122729893,"score_spread":0.23375656351091034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911646408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9878551,0.000074401316,0.000006024532,0.003265747,0.0014540683,0.00077747455,0.0000038823123,0.000027148526,0.0065361485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897155,0.000029741852,0.000609243,0.0013273776,0.00087653846,0.000022807972,0.0000038725993,0.00003674759,0.007378172],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704164,0.0004047998,0.00079331186,0.00045030078,0.0003964854,0.0009134613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976374,0.00092947425,0.00066214224,0.00036918328,0.00009650472,0.00030527508],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002451191,0.00023166831,0.0006235876,0.00021958661,0.00026134125,0.000057904057,0.0008564962,0.00032507462,0.0032516047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003032937,0.00014724665,0.0001680959,0.00030227608,0.00007909441,0.00041854614,0.0002767941,0.0006418672,0.0016832252],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041848113,0.000255427,0.72554505,0.000067343164,0.000089077614,0.000052861113,0.0005492324,0.0009902265,0.0017475788,0.00017726813,0.2696504,0.00045704088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046125385,0.010188835,0.28758192,0.00009957908,0.000081578095,0.00030982168,0.00059919583,0.0017449681,0.001965828,0.0012280825,0.6910745,0.0005131952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014049592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015671487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43796316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005848161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016079153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99909407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967273322","doi":"10.1093/jue/juz013","title":"An urban wildlife habitat experiment: conservation implications of altering management regimes on animals and plants along urban and rural rights-of-way","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Alberta","funders":"Manitoba Hydro; University of Manitoba","keywords":"Cirsium arvense; Geography; Wildlife; Thistle; Habitat; Agroforestry; Vegetation (pathology); Weed control; Ecology; Agronomy; Biology","score_opus":0.00916797756750857,"score_gpt":0.24301108779824376,"score_spread":0.2338431102307352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2967273322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971902,0.0001831407,0.000029051704,0.00071072835,0.00012643327,0.000187627,0.0000063917837,0.00000438501,0.0015620406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986554,0.00009711624,0.0008040971,0.00027732775,0.000019621366,0.0000060530906,0.000002675432,0.0000060534157,0.00013165332],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909407,0.00007970972,0.00043366797,0.00014305726,0.0001001483,0.00014936166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911314,0.00015997427,0.00051062094,0.00012805792,0.000024682791,0.00006352845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027074973,0.00010478073,0.00027871426,0.00010207636,0.00010423444,0.000007649325,0.000119954835,0.00006405122,0.00006379453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013506366,0.00009012109,0.00003262282,0.000057716792,0.00024494538,0.0002004026,0.000071103204,0.00008895251,0.000005562104],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009520011,0.00011188183,0.9857525,0.000019800797,0.000082988525,0.000004142495,0.0011486465,0.00017048618,0.0055617173,0.004745683,0.002212716,0.00009422947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071145943,0.0010351734,0.99494743,0.000029064666,0.00003243983,0.000031650325,0.0004909659,0.00034702086,0.0006804576,0.0011038944,0.00050609576,0.000084347215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001728699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012488694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009194923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006156752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007060545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36750314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2976557596","doi":"10.1093/jue/juz015","title":"Male and female bats differ in their use of a large urban park","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Urbanization; Foraging; Geography; Wildlife; Predation; Urban park; Habitat; Ecology; Urban ecology; Eptesicus fuscus; National park; Biology; Environmental planning","score_opus":0.022301143515233712,"score_gpt":0.2123873183391523,"score_spread":0.1900861748239186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2976557596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997586,0.00053334626,1.7034652e-7,0.0013107889,0.00030518317,0.000096965334,0.000017282571,0.0000030221622,0.00014722637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983822,0.00021102742,0.000026325804,0.0006047097,0.00009546504,0.0000021459402,0.0000023973842,6.7831945e-7,0.0006750425],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905837,0.00015107573,0.0003516427,0.00013225255,0.00004278675,0.00026384924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893963,0.0006496789,0.00026575345,0.00003624316,0.00006127825,0.000047430192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000359611,0.0001025697,0.0004284324,0.00003246231,0.00005454891,0.000005769381,0.00013087507,0.0001980289,0.000534055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009374085,0.000037439422,0.000078388104,0.00010317088,0.00012739503,0.00010970867,0.00009164719,0.00021037617,0.000011657903],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011202804,0.00015644928,0.98171955,0.0000054309876,0.000045759985,0.000014036625,0.00025510174,6.2786194e-7,0.013129871,0.00009991224,0.0040776497,0.00038356372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042035335,0.0010351797,0.983177,0.00001124217,0.000011247912,0.00010923886,0.00044978142,0.000007832545,0.00028884102,0.00011469236,0.014302614,0.000071983675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013779553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014672246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01284103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016469045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008662129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5847528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007844613","doi":"10.1093/jue/juaa006","title":"Road salt impact on soil electrical conductivity across an urban landscape","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Smart Materials for Construction","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"University of Wisconsin-Madison; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Environmental science; Soil water; Surface runoff; Throughflow; Hydrology (agriculture); Land cover; Impervious surface; Land use; Soil science; Ecology; Geology","score_opus":0.013654419797123424,"score_gpt":0.2626074486054812,"score_spread":0.24895302880835776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007844613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99791,0.000013448121,0.000026367823,0.0011373633,0.00058292213,0.00008482613,0.0000084887515,0.000019761012,0.00021681332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99846864,0.000004524766,0.000076149074,0.00077161356,0.00064234296,0.000002020497,0.0000018936239,0.000015007565,0.000017811313],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868107,0.00019855119,0.00033273944,0.0002059486,0.00022946311,0.00035221962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913424,0.00005913689,0.0003676702,0.00012470213,0.00001952415,0.0002947435],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037214917,0.00014802488,0.00033763566,0.000036689886,0.00009895969,0.000038712315,0.00024816534,0.00013364817,0.0013227168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013150301,0.00011425265,0.00013178609,0.00017451112,0.00014130512,0.0003889754,0.00006861679,0.00031124943,0.00023199369],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046985474,0.00014428329,0.90982395,0.0000017948564,0.0000376307,0.00006595886,0.00045622385,0.0007453899,0.04334327,0.000009962004,0.043042526,0.0018591528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008262423,0.0028027603,0.9881781,0.0000015882663,0.000021942618,0.00037681762,0.000052556086,0.000510618,0.004755233,0.000052843487,0.0022839084,0.0001374246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000039055092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008369831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07835411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023684607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037694197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165479629","doi":"10.1093/jue/juab013","title":"Stakeholder perspectives on the development and implementation of approaches to municipal rat management","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Government of British Columbia; BC Centre for Disease Control; Ministry of Agriculture; University of Saskatchewan; Canadian Science Centre for Human and Animal Health","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Stakeholder; Urbanization; Focus group; Thematic analysis; Environmental planning; Scale (ratio); Process management; Conceptual framework; Environmental resource management; Public relations; Qualitative research; Political science; Marketing; Geography; Economic growth; Sociology","score_opus":0.12070896952637157,"score_gpt":0.27913141616756626,"score_spread":0.1584224466411947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165479629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957388,0.00006806177,0.000018627685,0.002247544,0.000065698914,0.00009809321,5.73147e-7,0.0000011721986,0.0017614088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99774057,0.000025572328,0.0016750367,0.00020666381,0.000011901428,0.0000081780945,2.2871637e-7,0.0000028709178,0.00032899712],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939585,0.000069893984,0.00021834459,0.000100447476,0.000102022335,0.00011344748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997036,0.000065017404,0.00012968683,0.000059538623,0.000012386779,0.000029796553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030459385,0.00006026664,0.0001271709,0.000029982097,0.00010749431,0.0000048674556,0.00008732738,0.000024030607,0.0007731346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014016162,0.00004022753,0.000025164769,0.00007396423,0.00010819905,0.000039787064,0.00015355485,0.0000821112,0.000010458737],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104627405,0.00043585413,0.9266283,0.000010790772,0.00021793561,0.00007771659,0.04813158,0.00012226569,0.0012203719,0.0078103775,0.0066335727,0.008606588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024469953,0.00032163807,0.9171587,0.0000034582652,0.000033479522,0.000017030905,0.076790646,0.0000011173012,0.0025424422,0.00007316507,0.0027700195,0.00004359308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000027960261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00065091613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028659066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001023118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013855866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8465281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189670387","doi":"10.1093/jue/juab021","title":"Comparison of beaver density and foraging preferences between urban and rural riparian forests along the South Saskatchewan River, Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Ecology and biodiversity studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Global Institute for Water Security; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Beaver; Riparian zone; Foraging; Geography; Transect; Habitat; Ecology; Riparian forest; Agroforestry; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.01617970947875474,"score_gpt":0.21955551725129407,"score_spread":0.20337580777253933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189670387","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982068,0.00029759193,0.000008875496,0.001179094,0.00015547723,0.00004979394,0.0000105395075,0.00000152518,0.00009030942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995299,0.000013740761,0.00015887058,0.00016902598,0.000040351108,2.7684473e-7,0.0000015071353,0.0000018313239,0.00008448693],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992272,0.00011082116,0.00025080013,0.00010423541,0.0001289826,0.00017791566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927855,0.0002443085,0.00030467322,0.00006840347,0.000032367607,0.00007172563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023139751,0.00008561345,0.00031582423,0.000019085805,0.0002806881,0.000009217159,0.00013272683,0.00006723207,0.000050957224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006475561,0.000060396625,0.000032736174,0.00006105264,0.00051529345,0.000090026144,0.0002747471,0.0002040092,9.422215e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001694121,0.000019467632,0.98515344,0.0000057236834,0.00009116217,0.000024639425,0.0052133403,0.000013851125,0.000028697385,0.000004132566,0.009148305,0.00028030947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034731027,0.00014562183,0.98876035,0.0000072128337,0.00011141021,0.00002795362,0.009427141,0.000017515436,0.00030801375,0.0001779656,0.000605934,0.000063555155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018624473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7951951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7765706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000079487094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009751955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98791057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204589214","doi":"10.1093/jue/juab029","title":"Occurrence of a forest-dwelling bat, northern myotis (<i>Myotis septentrionalis</i>), within Canada’s largest conurbation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Bat Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Zoo","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Ecology; Geography; Habitat; Conurbation; Population; Urban ecology; Foraging; Biology","score_opus":0.012738544833055327,"score_gpt":0.19445396615542251,"score_spread":0.18171542132236718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204589214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917136,0.0012444957,0.000004277655,0.005513929,0.0011817025,0.000062397005,0.00012744516,0.0000054319016,0.00014673489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984106,0.00016964642,0.000069798625,0.00088490534,0.00020739865,0.0000023722168,0.000053879012,6.63749e-7,0.00020074118],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856794,0.00019589088,0.00062849856,0.00017776142,0.00015027222,0.00027966153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979191,0.00065951986,0.0007149235,0.000045807174,0.0005733719,0.00008730546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040633656,0.00013227916,0.00044540467,0.000020051324,0.00018689837,0.0000082251145,0.00021668627,0.00017700517,0.00043715182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000441381,0.000060844195,0.00012643359,0.00019016417,0.00015778962,0.00008459008,0.000064277156,0.00027617885,0.000006517202],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050879615,0.000109443776,0.9742681,0.000008001732,0.0001370428,0.000121624194,0.00010174879,0.00013279573,0.002507433,0.00016318499,0.021778455,0.0006213374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003442697,0.00052557356,0.9757078,0.000019476383,0.00007023922,0.000291983,0.00046417085,0.00002279588,0.0012690146,0.00030003933,0.020852895,0.00013173989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051520145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87447363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86932164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008273911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035168556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7788339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214437232","doi":"10.1093/jue/juab034","title":"Inter-population differences in coyote diet and niche width along an urban–suburban–rural gradient","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Isotope Analysis in Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Alberta Museum; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Generalist and specialist species; Geography; Niche; Ecology; Wildlife; Habitat; Ecological niche; Predation; Population; Urban ecology; Biology; Environmental health","score_opus":0.01060857153201707,"score_gpt":0.22946099641169715,"score_spread":0.21885242487968007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214437232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981439,0.00017769983,0.00011608688,0.0007036805,0.00048643773,0.000078354824,0.0000014976345,0.000005956218,0.0002863967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982294,0.00009439713,0.00074712746,0.0004958511,0.00010803392,0.000004252259,0.000006058569,0.000011251709,0.00030362327],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808663,0.00042242088,0.00070295774,0.00025061006,0.000190325,0.00034707462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990146,0.00017929068,0.00043342175,0.00019992322,0.000033638687,0.00013910841],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057214405,0.00015805237,0.00049354834,0.00014722461,0.00008154071,0.000033455122,0.00026560613,0.00014679148,0.0010416439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022793081,0.00013748897,0.000091451795,0.00026282342,0.00020818187,0.00037686917,0.00020142097,0.0003544843,0.000022446515],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069090835,0.00020511694,0.9945609,0.000003616778,0.000039267357,0.00021337868,0.00062587415,0.00013297926,0.0006134719,0.000086668384,0.001825582,0.0016240464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061101693,0.0008010071,0.994088,0.00001199227,0.000055319277,0.00024168087,0.0003002529,0.0011612886,0.000117865646,0.0017802308,0.00069133897,0.00014003251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017366417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009561557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009387894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032937666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028670878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285243330","doi":"10.1093/jue/juac009","title":"The impact of urbanization on outcrossing rate and population genetic variation in the native wildflower, <i>Impatiens capensis</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biology; Outcrossing; Wildflower; Genetic diversity; Ecology; Population; Habitat fragmentation; Genetic variation; Biodiversity; Pollen; Demography","score_opus":0.019961589601571263,"score_gpt":0.22698756608941995,"score_spread":0.20702597648784868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285243330","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99882305,0.00016389204,5.807299e-7,0.0007886049,0.000070419985,0.000079082674,0.000009893142,0.0000012782498,0.00006319055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997015,0.000058097125,0.0000044220305,0.00013633177,0.00008245004,0.0000017666855,0.0000026951625,3.9799042e-7,0.000012337682],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923515,0.0002819974,0.0002284596,0.00005497888,0.00010467559,0.0000947356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990503,0.0005297678,0.0003427589,0.000010282226,0.000054742908,0.000012122443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005100086,0.000051548624,0.00011523377,0.000016148007,0.0004206326,0.000023366838,0.00009394084,0.000019883231,0.000013200036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012570158,0.000015074745,0.00004332933,0.00017637417,0.000030460553,0.000048517453,0.000027182743,0.000117229974,1.8616679e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024449307,0.00011547606,0.97048116,0.0000011196535,0.000033565928,0.000007878183,0.0017640445,0.0015424986,0.021285055,0.00021057576,0.0018604145,0.002453728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013820492,0.0013215739,0.9968332,0.0000028083443,0.000008119591,0.000024415058,0.00037712394,0.0002731256,0.0000134029215,0.00077500596,0.00020304054,0.000029975243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015179816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007846086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026352054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055694232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000097483135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32352084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4363610960","doi":"10.1093/jue/juad002","title":"Urban wildlife and arborists: environmental governance and the protection of wildlife during tree care operations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Urban Green Space and Health","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Wildlife; Wildlife conservation; Environmental planning; Legislation; Work (physics); North American Model of Wildlife Conservation; Wildlife management; Urban forestry; Best practice; Business; Arboriculture; Environmental resource management; Geography; Political science; Agroforestry; Ecology; Engineering; Environmental science","score_opus":0.007176282216232793,"score_gpt":0.2086641777391842,"score_spread":0.2014878955229514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4363610960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99444836,0.0004619954,0.000012003297,0.0045442777,0.00012912859,0.0002466086,0.000009951292,0.000006693058,0.00014099662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978868,0.0009586042,0.000092383976,0.0003915036,0.00013869682,0.000010585587,9.600371e-7,0.000010158966,0.0005103202],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990184,0.000103097984,0.00034421144,0.00014191617,0.00020337875,0.00018904083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945706,0.00005774804,0.00027054027,0.00011758889,0.000007340159,0.000089748246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030208784,0.000099202574,0.00023913014,0.000042471827,0.00022123907,0.000013928736,0.00011982057,0.00006967901,0.00008836131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049936567,0.00007142858,0.00004905603,0.00012454853,0.00043911068,0.00019853901,0.00010858677,0.000225086,0.000015085411],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014698152,0.000036130168,0.9833656,0.000022128303,0.000026139645,0.000014157144,0.003185872,0.00020599148,0.0020944332,0.00008840112,0.010265416,0.00054877164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015749926,0.00032541214,0.99128944,0.000015092784,0.000031839947,0.000088229644,0.0010612725,0.00032934482,0.000087955385,0.000037120655,0.0050855675,0.00007373532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021353683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016620446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007923858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019039973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002501221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2912773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378470877","doi":"10.1093/jue/juad006","title":"Bee–plant interaction and community response along an urbanization gradient","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; York University","keywords":"Pollinator; Species richness; Urbanization; Ecology; Generalist and specialist species; Impervious surface; Plant community; Geography; Urban ecology; Halictidae; Habitat; Abundance (ecology); Native plant; Biology; Pollination; Apoidea; Introduced species; Pollen","score_opus":0.06276619049428449,"score_gpt":0.24585359726815764,"score_spread":0.18308740677387314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378470877","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99842566,0.0000475752,3.2283089e-7,0.001281241,0.00013071747,0.00003313199,0.000014545786,0.000017175375,0.000049601662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994961,0.00012934211,0.000008006475,0.00012316353,0.00015690562,7.3587955e-7,0.0000119864135,4.5032925e-7,0.00007328811],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991564,0.00042182225,0.00018639895,0.000052922907,0.00006404902,0.00011841944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990858,0.0006309982,0.00015540773,0.000009343326,0.00006181964,0.000056631055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083413284,0.000056210738,0.00013404289,0.00003011003,0.00031333265,0.000022246462,0.00009272438,0.00004542798,0.000024407194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019465601,0.000022259623,0.000029004324,0.00015023418,0.000035720786,0.00013948574,0.000046789817,0.00020837603,0.000008139098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001914012,0.00026766086,0.6371313,0.0000065255435,0.00005721497,0.00011620997,0.001974366,0.000010676294,0.33277568,0.00015139906,0.020165695,0.0054292795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000107758206,0.001721389,0.98756146,0.000008922017,0.000010239941,0.00018168191,0.0018318872,0.00005254892,0.00021809676,0.0002269754,0.008030476,0.00004853907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000058316175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035068658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35043022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023725052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000044269163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24099332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383750086","doi":"10.1093/jue/juad015","title":"Range-wide site-occupancy modeling of Red-winged Blackbirds (<i>Agelaius phoeniceus</i>)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"University of Massachusetts Boston","keywords":"Occupancy; Habitat; Urbanization; Ecology; Range (aeronautics); Geography; Land cover; Habitat destruction; Urban ecology; Population; Disturbance (geology); Land use; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.015212764770479434,"score_gpt":0.2292391935385067,"score_spread":0.21402642876802724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383750086","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99481976,0.00005037832,0.0003506596,0.0025967574,0.0006377395,0.00010273386,0.000003415375,0.000026960133,0.0014116018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99752796,0.00008704769,0.00052701763,0.0010483748,0.0001318063,0.0000043431655,0.0000029848914,0.000015752397,0.0006547072],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984073,0.00017274199,0.0006930245,0.00017252681,0.00023172649,0.00032267172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987783,0.000363413,0.00052462047,0.00018373536,0.000053810047,0.000096133816],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010452616,0.00012658066,0.00036611487,0.00016225612,0.00011059386,0.000006905477,0.00030561176,0.00018679096,0.0009983082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049160124,0.00011775761,0.0001537595,0.00043269267,0.00014273044,0.00028198387,0.00013050974,0.00031653713,0.00032609966],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014197137,0.000070827824,0.93058556,0.0000075354524,0.00004161161,0.000069669404,0.00041128855,0.013153519,0.0019986015,0.000014485824,0.0533378,0.00016713035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010083094,0.00033313473,0.98080575,0.000014989431,0.00006583195,0.00005635116,0.00012208184,0.013822689,0.00022810086,0.0009479904,0.0024733979,0.00012136809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002738992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025678336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050864406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013764914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006026083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399979557","doi":"10.1093/jue/juae014","title":"Exploring differences in neophobia and anti-predator behaviour between urban and rural mountain chickadees","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Neophobia; Predator; Ecology; Geography; Predation; Zoology; Biology","score_opus":0.05490875273549468,"score_gpt":0.28105401863719054,"score_spread":0.22614526590169587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399979557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99623847,0.0030555076,0.000012117565,0.00047146002,0.00012778431,0.000055882596,0.000009901431,0.0000046264568,0.000024234632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99845225,0.0010787002,0.00011750107,0.000061087674,0.00020226868,0.0000048885813,0.000008430751,0.000010676286,0.00006419497],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992801,0.000087765875,0.0002951914,0.00012507445,0.0000624661,0.0001493991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965763,0.000041891508,0.00008457453,0.00009780478,0.00003370454,0.00008436748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020861931,0.000105249725,0.00022133459,0.000111403504,0.00004403196,0.000045183395,0.00015221971,0.00010900788,0.000012897512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037741356,0.000087622175,0.00004464545,0.000062598716,0.00011078126,0.000021917052,0.00012685853,0.0002472051,0.000001259274],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002524936,0.00003204758,0.9537293,0.000012549036,0.00002334712,0.000019293508,0.0002150181,1.7731557e-7,0.04446692,0.00006201067,0.00035164435,0.001062475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029604332,0.000538906,0.99385905,0.000036713674,0.000043305594,0.00007583213,0.00050296896,0.000009654065,0.0031254308,0.000028510422,0.0013831387,0.00010047113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015218886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000054848497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041341487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016644293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047055302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35731286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411439219","doi":"10.1093/jue/juaf006","title":"A comparative analysis of metacommunities reveals contrasting drivers of alpha and beta diversity in urban butterflies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Butterfly; Species richness; Ecology; Beta diversity; Urban ecology; Biodiversity; Impervious surface; Alpha diversity; Gamma diversity; Nestedness; Geography; Metacommunity; Biology; Species diversity; Urbanization; Biological dispersal; Population","score_opus":0.06073509773826453,"score_gpt":0.25058789087131506,"score_spread":0.18985279313305053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411439219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978991,0.00089272624,7.2822144e-7,0.0003936525,0.00002463326,0.000036826685,0.000036215315,0.0000014979004,0.0007146296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99963725,0.0001885835,0.000029874058,0.000064579894,0.000013090866,2.8472456e-7,0.0000017387491,1.01335246e-7,0.00006447493],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992941,0.00013886527,0.00033470264,0.00005831316,0.00007114319,0.000102872145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862486,0.0008490054,0.0003754738,0.000011582488,0.00011868652,0.000020400967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031167024,0.000066461886,0.0006672685,0.00010827257,0.000109850895,0.0000052379824,0.0001558613,0.000041236177,0.000023244302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048667556,0.000028813924,0.00010991933,0.00037112745,0.0001724267,0.00006847998,0.00017351679,0.00010364374,8.4158664e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007680494,0.000058197766,0.97895014,0.0000074762534,0.00083332206,0.0000044568683,0.0016069857,0.0000069373946,0.017355397,0.00031244944,0.000652375,0.00013547046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019695722,0.00030054402,0.9928254,0.000029526273,0.0004445931,0.0000014894802,0.0052355872,0.000026532533,0.00057573256,0.00016860517,0.00015507596,0.000039960654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015203218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006033168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016779665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016206162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000057346956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33666494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7083286891","doi":"10.1093/jue/juaf014","title":"Attraction to birdseed by non-target wildlife and implications for management of urban coyotes (<i>Canis latrans</i>)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Ecology","topic":"Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Attraction; Wildlife; Mammal; Human–wildlife conflict; Predation; Rodent; Charadriiformes; Urban ecology","score_opus":0.008431336618187091,"score_gpt":0.2447538570371294,"score_spread":0.2363225204189423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7083286891","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1658758,0.00039026944,0.72449064,0.105299994,0.00069617317,0.00051120913,0.000020891877,0.000027460626,0.002687572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679828,0.00004764134,0.029225554,0.0012829168,0.00004395359,0.000016262553,0.0000018715175,0.0000021111903,0.0013968789],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923146,0.000022025693,0.0003637865,0.00015838679,0.000057101995,0.00016722972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916595,0.00015878068,0.00024367566,0.00016702204,0.00019401353,0.00007056376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031146884,0.00008186351,0.00021591467,0.00010293195,0.00008715061,0.000020553778,0.0003425637,0.000070036964,0.0000070830374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041828927,0.00007712208,0.000063387815,0.00020704011,0.00003493826,0.00011378141,0.000067893445,0.00009307076,7.054836e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010454295,0.0004927305,0.1763141,0.00039865074,0.00046100453,0.000007533114,0.00060445716,0.0006819606,0.045416377,0.025091121,0.74587816,0.0045493534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018032625,0.0008473612,0.60206777,0.00010436793,0.00012695747,0.00007422376,0.0001748352,0.0015198071,0.013198429,0.022930617,0.3569111,0.00024127819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000029987693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000034289485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.802107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003207287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005245534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31449473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}