{"meta":{"query_hash":"3102dbae6b6f","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Usability Studies archive"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/3102dbae6b6f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Usability+Studies+archive"},"results":[{"id":"W2100249939","doi":"10.5555/2019116.2019118","title":"Comparing Computer Versus Human Data Collection Methods for Public Usability Evaluations of a Tactile-Audio Display","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Usability Studies archive","topic":"Tactile and Sensory Interactions","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Usability; Human–computer interaction; Computer science; Context (archaeology); Multimedia; Data collection; Usability engineering; Perspective (graphical); Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.3805955447662984,"score_gpt":0.505505412120582,"score_spread":0.12490986735428355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100249939","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7618108,0.0012084321,0.2154125,0.00032149602,0.00020853445,0.014042384,0.0006990897,0.0011458243,0.005150956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7643928,0.0004219932,0.20873632,0.00020827388,0.00015000861,0.024628032,0.0004598606,0.00022487756,0.0007777867],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.7990614,0.16178936,0.014460412,0.007183384,0.01580729,0.0016981048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.38026112,0.52884954,0.017949117,0.035960864,0.035344496,0.0016349388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11358681,0.0016210637,0.00133357,0.004754613,0.0013063574,0.0023028946,0.0017649393,0.0015373783,0.0026714506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27002487,0.00070973666,0.0012021598,0.0032304202,0.0019907241,0.0026527669,0.0025359374,0.0009234885,0.0005163141],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.032360855,0.012384002,0.11179547,0.009819304,0.0019320821,0.0006895815,0.041828435,0.0056021987,0.057119783,0.0038588685,0.0029783172,0.719631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013866826,0.14744017,0.54253393,0.003666398,0.0038098486,0.0032512457,0.038597103,0.0674534,0.13030261,0.008270649,0.03889961,0.0019082563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014487237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024018064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11358681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015960505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017377564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6007117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119714469","doi":"","title":"A low-cost test environment for usability studies of head-mounted virtual reality systems","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Usability Studies archive","topic":"Interactive and Immersive Displays","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Usability; Computer science; Human–computer interaction; Pluralistic walkthrough; Usability engineering; Usability lab; Virtual reality; Test (biology); Cognitive walkthrough; Optical head-mounted display; Heuristic evaluation; Virtual machine; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07254328403151822,"score_gpt":0.3606774337090081,"score_spread":0.2881341496774899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119714469","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46453333,0.000754049,0.5074891,0.0006321,0.00022984487,0.0116110565,0.00072267774,0.003924272,0.010103556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35106248,0.00036429145,0.6342327,0.00024451787,0.00007449959,0.010797316,0.0006264787,0.0005003501,0.0020973694],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.98703605,0.0097344415,0.0009373961,0.0003083512,0.0016598733,0.0003238447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95555705,0.034902163,0.0011196149,0.0036202811,0.0037024717,0.0010984095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012196051,0.00078814494,0.00075821724,0.001456434,0.0006946867,0.0012646092,0.0015747779,0.0008165657,0.004975693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028806897,0.0005121351,0.00063454924,0.00057968515,0.000625465,0.0018496149,0.0015460962,0.0008896743,0.0011507138],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037035842,0.009551947,0.024125133,0.005061876,0.0002450392,0.0023711866,0.0119960345,0.010419311,0.26278383,0.010738984,0.011619453,0.64738375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006235377,0.12888888,0.31940478,0.0031769802,0.00073190645,0.009677574,0.01362225,0.063430704,0.28385246,0.017075721,0.15256381,0.0013394178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039185327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066413963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012196051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043394326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008271088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06449962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273564813","doi":"","title":"Reverse engineering of content to find usability problems: a healthcare case study","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Usability Studies archive","topic":"Usability and User Interface Design","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Usability; Usability engineering; Artifact (error); Computer science; System usability scale; Pluralistic walkthrough; Usability inspection; Reverse engineering; Task (project management); Human–computer interaction; Usability lab; Web usability; Heuristic evaluation; Cognitive walkthrough; Usability goals; Software engineering; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Systems engineering; Programming language","score_opus":0.16189085914638227,"score_gpt":0.3430565840768054,"score_spread":0.18116572493042313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273564813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9265653,0.0016517675,0.057878427,0.004414891,0.000112998874,0.0017323421,0.00015634511,0.00022243045,0.007265441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92378324,0.0013578071,0.06863798,0.0011654475,0.00006296584,0.00050116883,0.00012468295,0.00010964987,0.0042568897],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98543984,0.010000493,0.00088853174,0.0006507528,0.0022895536,0.000730803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9520714,0.037641004,0.0021357704,0.0032971024,0.003658983,0.0011957267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01178772,0.0008054962,0.0008056083,0.0018515078,0.0035530273,0.0022928766,0.0018497901,0.004799711,0.0013366994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030656496,0.00055401475,0.0009698873,0.001453579,0.0025470767,0.0028100049,0.0023848086,0.0016731182,0.00062920817],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019125182,0.0118462695,0.08114211,0.004980889,0.00029504727,0.15729703,0.2913305,0.0067920056,0.030734707,0.013564611,0.01446449,0.38563976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012110267,0.015292164,0.0580989,0.0043916823,0.00072021724,0.2915401,0.26351452,0.05338707,0.12977767,0.016035337,0.16520695,0.00082432904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026488288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00443487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01178772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016598855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019922138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0623402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}