{"meta":{"query_hash":"5300b5a1dbf5","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination"},"cohort_total":16,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":16,"exported":16,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/5300b5a1dbf5","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Water+Reuse+and+Desalination"},"results":[{"id":"W1201483785","doi":"10.2166/wrd.2015.058","title":"Anaerobic membrane bioreactor for high-strength wastewater treatment: batch and continuous operation comparison","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination","topic":"Membrane Separation Technologies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Bioreactor; Wastewater; Effluent; Filtration (mathematics); Chemical oxygen demand; Membrane fouling; Chemistry; Pulp and paper industry; Membrane; Anaerobic exercise; Membrane bioreactor; Chromatography; Sewage treatment; Fouling; Hydraulic retention time; Membrane reactor; Environmental engineering; Environmental science; Biology; Biochemistry; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.028372406342832907,"score_gpt":0.267630912512137,"score_spread":0.23925850616930408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1201483785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98790735,0.0030046313,0.007521994,0.00007953485,0.000059370574,0.00006182861,0.00024085844,0.00013446099,0.0009899911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98634976,0.002122207,0.009596351,0.000043979377,0.000024876586,0.00006453739,0.00040791763,0.000027273842,0.001363003],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933463,0.000119569995,0.00007480445,0.000095850315,0.00031267095,0.00006243848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957305,0.0001043313,0.0000655978,0.0000402304,0.00015289416,0.000063855805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007734984,0.00044142312,0.00078128045,0.00045348477,0.00033953428,0.0006672538,0.00055127067,0.000545973,0.0007352018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006015122,0.00017850894,0.0006031426,0.0004687137,0.00013256655,0.0006567896,0.00028240564,0.0005613102,0.00033983172],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011853027,0.00049785106,0.0012093846,0.00029174244,0.000032573374,0.0000484937,0.00003945007,0.0005783707,0.9796737,0.000041280324,0.00008422582,0.016317533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008386328,0.0050557344,0.020554282,0.000024256798,0.00012612561,0.00024322272,0.0000985357,0.006709965,0.96491,0.000044782693,0.0021031515,0.000046127465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003774056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004137301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003774056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052671676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048454042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007504165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1848759959","doi":"10.2166/wrd.2015.070","title":"Effect of coagulant and flocculant addition scheme on the treatment of dairy farm wastewater","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination","topic":"Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Flocculation; Alum; Wastewater; Chemistry; Pulp and paper industry; Filtration (mathematics); Fouling; Waste management; Reverse osmosis; Sewage treatment; Membrane; Membrane fouling; Suspended solids; Engineering; Organic chemistry","score_opus":0.030210253094768984,"score_gpt":0.27785103214811774,"score_spread":0.24764077905334875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1848759959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979328,0.0006687345,0.00059593626,0.00004230117,0.000042818665,0.00006830302,0.000045696703,0.000052220177,0.0005511554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946338,0.000891827,0.003583648,0.00006654399,0.000020036783,0.000028729217,0.000062052386,0.0000113453925,0.00070201565],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996966,0.00007610977,0.000052119216,0.00006450894,0.000064132066,0.00004663225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964154,0.00010324303,0.00009904254,0.000027877091,0.00006323802,0.000065025015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034593424,0.0005839011,0.00042152446,0.0003652373,0.00019594019,0.00038031375,0.00049104175,0.0005198734,0.0009795056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007899168,0.00025380988,0.00032558604,0.0002935147,0.00020374844,0.00037062872,0.00021546036,0.00046111265,0.00023058387],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025069178,0.0010420631,0.0005584016,0.0003668244,0.00007617527,0.00011260132,0.00007632811,0.00097551866,0.98028207,0.000085256695,0.00012246374,0.01379525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097783006,0.0035873675,0.001688763,0.000015995294,0.000106157524,0.00004941951,0.000016481034,0.0017686021,0.99187803,0.000009343605,0.00076708203,0.000015034142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001830115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023257213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001830115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024935612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037632437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0036389232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1856430005","doi":"10.2166/wrd.2015.126","title":"Water reuse perceptions of students, faculty and staff at Western University, Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination","topic":"Wastewater Treatment and Reuse","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Land reclamation; Reclaimed water; Reuse; Wastewater; Water cycle; Water resources; Water quality; Environmental science; Environmental planning; Business; Environmental engineering; Geography; Engineering; Waste management; Ecology","score_opus":0.018017405693491195,"score_gpt":0.23970995408029255,"score_spread":0.22169254838680136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1856430005","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957931,0.00011346507,0.000033998418,0.00054455316,0.00000915673,0.000017623013,0.00012906024,0.0000053994886,0.0033536472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957262,0.00023689313,0.000055911874,0.00021735532,0.0000043599284,0.0000104222445,0.00009681319,0.000003055867,0.003648937],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857783,0.0001493865,0.00006216645,0.00009003579,0.0006717352,0.0004488081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922654,0.00055420323,0.000738827,0.000071404094,0.002936439,0.0034336487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011009612,0.00017547999,0.00027407735,0.0010451135,0.004664432,0.0025684494,0.00047807346,0.00045978208,0.006773933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042829723,0.00023664247,0.00031251568,0.0015490914,0.0013736507,0.00070820434,0.001242179,0.0007661219,0.00057460676],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022658834,0.0006134045,0.8059342,0.00012746544,0.000035354748,0.00033841975,0.13982502,0.00023551981,0.002326493,0.0006204504,0.0092870165,0.040430047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000114542845,0.00018925608,0.80651605,0.00008592402,0.000015576832,0.00007711741,0.18403721,0.00026945904,0.00047385367,0.000060387163,0.008223379,0.000040263865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94204557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9706942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05795443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013433246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026785959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.116591394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068210233","doi":"10.2166/wrd.2013.007","title":"Ozone disinfection: main parameters for process design in wastewater treatment and reuse","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination","topic":"Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure; Hôpital Notre-Dame","funders":"","keywords":"Ozone; Effluent; Wastewater; Chemistry; Sewage treatment; Waste management; Organic matter; Water treatment; Residual; Environmental science; Environmental engineering; Pulp and paper industry; Environmental chemistry; Organic chemistry; Engineering","score_opus":0.02841418036326958,"score_gpt":0.2664893134117524,"score_spread":0.23807513304848282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068210233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7597483,0.021999074,0.21300408,0.00056072156,0.000139565,0.00045761425,0.0005074737,0.00056230294,0.0030208246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94403976,0.005997105,0.048140626,0.000077843804,0.000041476884,0.0002495681,0.00043618988,0.00015611379,0.0008612116],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922407,0.00021265078,0.00009116259,0.00015266494,0.00024902992,0.00007037891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943167,0.00020791616,0.0001589188,0.000053202657,0.00011515909,0.00003306725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011288659,0.0010027193,0.0007763178,0.00042617577,0.0002877421,0.00096325314,0.00051717827,0.0006214044,0.00116398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019108261,0.00031767107,0.0004496884,0.00044855778,0.0002029345,0.0008103649,0.00039097507,0.0005204652,0.00047592822],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043322548,0.00011345281,0.0016237089,0.0008290318,0.000023201976,0.000031103064,0.000040006882,0.003384531,0.96044147,0.00025736663,0.000098565375,0.03272428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059014357,0.0016281643,0.009986355,0.00008563306,0.0001700433,0.00021088897,0.00007685356,0.0076644453,0.9731477,0.00074393087,0.0061729318,0.00005391608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005855062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006491359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00116398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045754836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004729685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0059701204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071975552","doi":"10.2166/wrd.2014.001","title":"Review of the leading challenges in maintaining reclaimed water quality during storage and distribution","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination","topic":"Wastewater Treatment and Reuse","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"American Water (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Reclaimed water; Environmental science; Water quality; Land reclamation; Disinfectant; Water storage; Waste management; Business; Environmental engineering; Piping; Effluent; Product (mathematics); Distribution (mathematics); Environmental economics; Environmental planning; Engineering; Wastewater; Chemistry; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02690611207916228,"score_gpt":0.2600476189686632,"score_spread":0.23314150688950092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071975552","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006383697,0.99558455,0.0002760495,0.0009425284,0.00037009496,0.000021726066,0.00009307857,0.000009827246,0.002063912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018715283,0.99648225,0.00040838288,0.00033334657,0.00014656699,0.000011156978,0.000092569826,0.0000023912955,0.0006518293],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907565,0.00018759267,0.00021728406,0.00008948671,0.00036448162,0.00006559549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972402,0.0010387659,0.0004712913,0.00004215808,0.0011025142,0.00010516893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013526111,0.0006648017,0.0010114913,0.0039943717,0.00047001836,0.001437032,0.0010190965,0.00095686165,0.0030379852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026726972,0.00040467683,0.00077527645,0.005650609,0.0003615382,0.0018111953,0.0005840086,0.0007491262,0.0011208256],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010016699,0.000093585906,0.00075371534,0.13329652,0.0002263595,0.00051427726,0.00053288596,0.00055953633,0.0037545415,0.0028645196,0.07288745,0.78441644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000079344245,0.00015364168,0.0034359402,0.02814714,0.00030632174,0.00079002586,0.00056378846,0.00010754689,0.0009855294,0.0008079182,0.9646605,0.00003361023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005276957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0133545585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005276957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011848882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004692952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010492444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078634658","doi":"10.2166/wrd.2014.043","title":"Comparison of behaviour and fate of tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) in membrane bioreactors and conventional activated sludge process","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination","topic":"Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Government of Ontario","keywords":"Tetrabromobisphenol A; Activated sludge; Chemistry; Biosorption; Sorption; Membrane bioreactor; Bioreactor; Wastewater; Chromatography; Environmental chemistry; Biodegradation; Sewage treatment; Membrane; Pulp and paper industry; Adsorption; Environmental engineering; Environmental science; Biochemistry; Fire retardant; Organic chemistry","score_opus":0.01452251280369063,"score_gpt":0.2824897107174881,"score_spread":0.2679671979137974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078634658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99865353,0.00024362151,0.0007889277,0.000025000667,0.0000046481105,0.000007382941,0.000069793605,0.000016211712,0.00019087346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996999,0.0004705812,0.0015406472,0.000022318938,0.0000039197544,0.00002100084,0.00014920095,0.000008733357,0.00078471313],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99967635,0.00006852241,0.000029411145,0.00007210093,0.000107827706,0.00004581908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997756,0.00006760536,0.00003758487,0.000018527739,0.00007301285,0.000027635646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026103522,0.00030142363,0.0003002194,0.000293473,0.00025661883,0.0004513625,0.000221846,0.0004765645,0.0003670165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004183414,0.00016389672,0.00028194697,0.00026705547,0.00023007022,0.0003552911,0.00021901459,0.00031082082,0.00026769584],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006976011,0.000015095866,0.0007220296,0.000033741602,0.0000055138944,0.000027295484,0.000035737143,0.00012192304,0.9978745,0.000014131988,0.0000082538145,0.0010720723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007218535,0.0005268479,0.011269453,0.000006574231,0.000016434426,0.0001349935,0.00012747987,0.0012039513,0.986142,0.00003187003,0.00052428216,0.000008898836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058759023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005412406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058759023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041855001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038255166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011683404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172299621","doi":"10.2166/wrd.2011.041","title":"An evaluation of MBR and conventional pretreatment for reverse osmosis for water reclamation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination","topic":"Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Effluent; Reverse osmosis; Turbidity; Membrane bioreactor; Filtration (mathematics); Environmental science; Wastewater; Fouling; Land reclamation; Rotating biological contactor; Chemistry; Environmental engineering; Membrane fouling; Pulp and paper industry; Membrane; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05702864732843039,"score_gpt":0.2789305742333296,"score_spread":0.22190192690489924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172299621","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946418,0.0013210443,0.0034577346,0.000059705788,0.000029356077,0.000051895604,0.000045175617,0.000050349863,0.00034290206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899783,0.0011227024,0.007846245,0.000040614985,0.000019565736,0.000028288707,0.00015684305,0.000020757067,0.00078672427],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918634,0.00019726707,0.000055363944,0.00010976027,0.00038030389,0.000070926326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995443,0.0001296804,0.00014098466,0.000047954716,0.00008724034,0.00004980523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006314929,0.00053726975,0.00047829357,0.00031072187,0.00018821942,0.0004064727,0.0003715,0.0004905183,0.00074570195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012126329,0.00018296768,0.00033086012,0.00023305917,0.00026703713,0.00042919515,0.00023230024,0.00033773915,0.0002569283],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003978516,0.0001894446,0.00056388654,0.00017377819,0.000023567847,0.000044561024,0.000022670554,0.00027043317,0.991243,0.000036791625,0.00002825155,0.0070058424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008484037,0.008008066,0.010056613,0.000011279247,0.00009454885,0.00034122576,0.00004293158,0.0017841103,0.97745913,0.000022386113,0.0020740686,0.00002080261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001173513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020098677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001173513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032555813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003773826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0033397079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2221296519","doi":"10.2166/wrd.2015.114","title":"Controlling biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes through surface modification via grafting patterned polymer brushes","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination","topic":"Membrane Separation Technologies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Biofouling; Membrane; Chemical engineering; Fouling; Adhesion; Grafting; Reverse osmosis; Thin-film composite membrane; Contact angle; Materials science; Polyelectrolyte; Polymer; Polymer chemistry; Chemistry; Composite material","score_opus":0.04113392173664891,"score_gpt":0.27024936812654143,"score_spread":0.2291154463898925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2221296519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98914975,0.0009892387,0.008739523,0.000051015333,0.00003059617,0.000031773714,0.000060671246,0.0000898979,0.0008575587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98672384,0.001190958,0.0109842075,0.000044584598,0.000012542176,0.0000333807,0.000053792628,0.00001900084,0.0009377607],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998765,0.000013432824,0.000010265678,0.000031693788,0.00004305174,0.000025081656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999902,0.00002607022,0.00002989068,0.000008192288,0.000022540904,0.00001122793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001469243,0.0003571892,0.00020053038,0.00017211177,0.000112905196,0.00024522378,0.00018409728,0.0002860836,0.00031097553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022865138,0.00018289425,0.00022516224,0.00013511098,0.00017783142,0.00027494025,0.00019302094,0.00028084003,0.00017164387],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005947672,0.0000037149366,0.00002842627,0.000014558039,0.0000013967809,0.000010563468,0.0000047768604,0.000038904123,0.99925464,0.000017650591,0.0000064603,0.00061285676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025832999,0.000034407265,0.00040378232,0.0000014033925,0.0000036075025,0.0000236585,0.000003946191,0.0006899142,0.998497,0.0000090813255,0.0003283034,0.0000022749155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027807627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004722132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0003571892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019683543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011633093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0014281273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2325146463","doi":"10.2166/wrd.2016.155","title":"Status and trends of water quality in the Tafna catchment: a comparative study using water quality indices","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination","topic":"Water Quality and Pollution Assessment","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agência Nacional de Águas","keywords":"Water quality; Environmental science; Sampling (signal processing); Wadi; Pollution; Drainage basin; Hydrology (agriculture); Quality (philosophy); Water resource management; Sample (material); Index (typography); Environmental resource management; Geography; Ecology; Computer science; Engineering; Biology; Cartography","score_opus":0.09915280062046294,"score_gpt":0.38778887743213186,"score_spread":0.2886360768116689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2325146463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99938977,0.000060174156,0.000038612,0.000013748076,0.0000010391283,0.0000055756727,0.00015143587,0.0000018664912,0.00033770068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990834,0.000085582935,0.00014065944,0.000008420199,0.0000018886864,0.00001121614,0.00040894237,0.0000012415329,0.00025860156],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997191,0.00003752541,0.000025738253,0.000060966468,0.000068708556,0.00008794313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994542,0.000095232055,0.00015000893,0.000026841051,0.0001833277,0.00009040507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004581657,0.00015175754,0.00032906455,0.0017850888,0.0006166517,0.0006800684,0.00029748387,0.00038898224,0.0005167915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00097515347,0.00016589162,0.00029910402,0.0026183496,0.00056403165,0.000490616,0.00041051145,0.00020362374,0.00008795291],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019366703,0.00006120218,0.98197466,0.000047905192,0.00007559709,0.0003693159,0.0026008224,0.00019716215,0.0019796866,0.0001066096,0.00019286232,0.012200398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015400545,0.000025240472,0.9987764,0.0000032923626,0.0000066693783,0.000056253324,0.00073872734,0.00014276632,0.000036493824,0.0000054163675,0.00020463266,0.0000026746611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39401412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53791815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39401412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026124911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012483727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7834414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2335257150","doi":"10.2166/wrd.2013.092","title":"Ultrafiltration membrane process for produced water treatment: experimental and modeling","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination","topic":"Membrane Separation Technologies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Ultrafiltration (renal); Permeation; Polyacrylonitrile; Filtration (mathematics); Membrane; Produced water; Chemistry; Fouling; Chemical engineering; Membrane fouling; Chemical oxygen demand; Chromatography; Membrane technology; Water treatment; Wastewater; Environmental engineering; Environmental science; Organic chemistry; Polymer","score_opus":0.030944681974248992,"score_gpt":0.2806887519892372,"score_spread":0.24974407001498822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2335257150","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98385173,0.0010046191,0.012403753,0.00007960827,0.000014227979,0.000081335005,0.000640241,0.000072768125,0.0018517926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907161,0.0011005214,0.0069847745,0.000011004805,0.000004817621,0.00009897696,0.00040207693,0.000009699775,0.000671987],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997769,0.00004100509,0.000017577688,0.000041629937,0.00009476553,0.000028245671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997352,0.0001253591,0.000035357843,0.000020433985,0.00007611133,0.000007471245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048092465,0.0006039134,0.00069108396,0.0002834423,0.00043551927,0.00042406155,0.0006622252,0.0010610865,0.00060321443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005146195,0.0001975469,0.0007893765,0.00051328505,0.00018897018,0.0008242312,0.0002062812,0.0004989714,0.00013811271],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011038578,0.0011133624,0.010503869,0.0020336034,0.00010524222,0.00044005705,0.00025330874,0.4691661,0.4766877,0.0015471649,0.0006031016,0.036442682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011178361,0.0011942937,0.007945743,0.000036682977,0.00008953261,0.00012168668,0.000085373154,0.6036592,0.384145,0.00047595735,0.0020828226,0.00005188569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011198404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006372278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011198404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010017549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004906901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022266448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337351826","doi":"10.2166/wrd.2015.025","title":"Fate kinetic coefficients and correlation models for tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) in membrane bioreactors and conventional activated sludge process","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination","topic":"Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Tetrabromobisphenol A; Biosorption; Freundlich equation; Chemistry; Membrane bioreactor; Partition coefficient; Activated sludge; Environmental chemistry; Bioreactor; Wastewater; Correlation coefficient; Langmuir; Chromatography; Pulp and paper industry; Environmental engineering; Adsorption; Environmental science; Fire retardant; Organic chemistry","score_opus":0.02521983039310195,"score_gpt":0.2564209037850688,"score_spread":0.23120107339196688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337351826","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89234775,0.0019274956,0.10115949,0.00023508388,0.000041701616,0.00013352523,0.0005304752,0.00022742692,0.0033969781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868528,0.0015416456,0.0064636846,0.00003955967,0.000010016015,0.00017893074,0.0004699734,0.00002139909,0.004421885],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997329,0.00003893362,0.000019727288,0.00007841771,0.00008416866,0.00004576503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954575,0.00021423088,0.00008452838,0.000020941585,0.00012082109,0.000013764272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059934217,0.00070484314,0.00052047736,0.000435965,0.00028725446,0.00066572864,0.00072187436,0.00090571056,0.0005258359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010746731,0.0003222841,0.00092306314,0.00044421054,0.00023872055,0.00061295496,0.00036302154,0.0006088913,0.00045045748],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037582556,0.00029270607,0.00923274,0.00050432514,0.0001095784,0.00032949558,0.00022079196,0.7863945,0.18156853,0.0044754446,0.0006652344,0.015830906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011616887,0.00010379417,0.0014297413,0.0000055480637,0.000029359811,0.000048072565,0.000025945523,0.9808189,0.01650086,0.0005426495,0.00046882697,0.00001473346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014468813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005222724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014468813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001278864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087709003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028769195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2589563911","doi":"10.2166/wrd.2017.154","title":"Biological filtration with and without prior in-line coagulation to reduce UF fouling by secondary effluent","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination","topic":"Membrane Separation Technologies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Biofilter; Effluent; Ultrafiltration (renal); Fouling; Chemistry; Filtration (mathematics); Pulp and paper industry; Membrane fouling; Anthracite; Turbidity; Coagulation; Chromatography; Environmental engineering; Membrane; Environmental science; Coal","score_opus":0.02636677823854435,"score_gpt":0.2872878611188396,"score_spread":0.26092108288029525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2589563911","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955723,0.0005615619,0.0031696812,0.000030203151,0.000024692315,0.000024750383,0.000043821572,0.00003691776,0.00053591456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941414,0.00041463415,0.0041926675,0.000038986524,0.000012412131,0.000013124535,0.0000951913,0.000012050644,0.0010794682],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997392,0.000053324195,0.000016513519,0.000041669402,0.00009260618,0.000056592176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998498,0.00003015194,0.000048596186,0.000013612802,0.00003443079,0.000023323222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024685694,0.00043923958,0.00048031737,0.00017497141,0.00022541161,0.0004910064,0.00028786037,0.00037419135,0.0008178486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033136836,0.00010332297,0.00037997944,0.00015178071,0.00018185558,0.00023826872,0.00019920572,0.00038260088,0.00016691677],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006773568,0.00005989723,0.00018622812,0.00004289783,0.000005751211,0.000009461441,0.000009505014,0.000056405996,0.99800414,0.000010251655,0.000014182351,0.0015336877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070347223,0.00057576824,0.0039425236,0.0000040565137,0.000020278449,0.00006786347,0.000011234627,0.00042330337,0.99431926,0.000008286178,0.00061603903,0.000004402091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026500546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028925708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0026500546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003841392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029937248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005269289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607087718","doi":"10.2166/wrd.2017.200","title":"Optimized biological nitrogen removal of high-strength ammonium wastewater by activated sludge modeling","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination","topic":"Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wastewater; Activated sludge; Activated sludge model; Ammonium; Alkalinity; Denitrification; Sewage treatment; Environmental science; Chemistry; Nitrogen; Environmental engineering","score_opus":0.020992956730328628,"score_gpt":0.2389735584369864,"score_spread":0.21798060170665776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607087718","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9579948,0.00014657534,0.038347103,0.00006519985,0.000013348668,0.00006662938,0.0001613644,0.00015103097,0.0030539646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99299353,0.00008849225,0.0060558664,0.000007949026,0.0000014116133,0.00004811506,0.00008115434,0.000011319135,0.00071218004],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998908,0.000035383353,0.000007976336,0.000025302661,0.000025797035,0.000014709968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998481,0.00007853242,0.000019156423,0.000008994702,0.000038740312,0.0000063949597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027468268,0.00055864075,0.00046127065,0.00021705421,0.00025461963,0.00060924224,0.0005446733,0.0007228791,0.00042624545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048464924,0.00022485114,0.00063017826,0.00026611733,0.00020024586,0.00030542345,0.00023269837,0.00027851222,0.000081737664],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032508528,0.000040784904,0.0010120792,0.000029206423,0.000011515919,0.000028312157,0.00001543583,0.9892665,0.007695195,0.00016419616,0.000027271974,0.0016769896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000094450415,0.000038651757,0.00038919726,0.0000017489941,0.0000066500697,0.0000034044522,0.000007004421,0.9949109,0.004458827,0.0000701185,0.000100396166,0.0000037284624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020809809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013246105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020809809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011658664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010513924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041377366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765121055","doi":"10.2166/wrd.2017.020","title":"Towards development of a standard methodology for testing field performance of residential greywater reuse systems: case study of a greywater reuse system installed in 22 homes in Southern Ontario (Canada)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination","topic":"Wastewater Treatment and Reuse","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Greywater; Reuse; Shower; Engineering; Subsidy; Environmental engineering; Civil engineering; Environmental science; Waste management","score_opus":0.05335176131658563,"score_gpt":0.2749034945988216,"score_spread":0.22155173328223593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765121055","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8467381,0.0005447894,0.13344125,0.00024875242,0.000042284504,0.0068098167,0.0019651672,0.00056298956,0.009646835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7999706,0.0005624994,0.1900111,0.000108305394,0.000009033986,0.002316622,0.0013400096,0.00008600473,0.005595778],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947154,0.0011897504,0.00034589585,0.0004913193,0.0029977972,0.00025988332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943403,0.00063469727,0.00055402,0.0005124639,0.0038180912,0.00014039101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055514015,0.0012110417,0.0007556263,0.0018318965,0.0019254239,0.0011547155,0.0022123966,0.0009564051,0.0012374205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038638995,0.0005246886,0.000745068,0.0017922345,0.0016217876,0.00056818477,0.0010506355,0.0005053515,0.0004405103],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006797968,0.0027254596,0.23757309,0.001821066,0.00020342505,0.0012698277,0.0062860884,0.015227575,0.5648092,0.0008678662,0.0023713212,0.16616532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022860174,0.007952476,0.6000275,0.0002714477,0.00025430042,0.0010070134,0.010679471,0.030924315,0.33141428,0.00063576526,0.016431918,0.0001729877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46320528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7183128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5367947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009273339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068148286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92101824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804168289","doi":"10.2166/wrd.2018.010","title":"Assessing water quality for urban tributaries of the Three Gorges Reservoir, China","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination","topic":"Water Quality and Pollution Assessment","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tributary; Three gorges; Water quality; Environmental science; China; Water resources; Water resource management; Upstream (networking); Pollutant; Pollution; Urbanization; Wastewater; Sewage; Environmental engineering; Engineering; Geography","score_opus":0.052644172723572545,"score_gpt":0.3351216565243344,"score_spread":0.2824774838007619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804168289","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99898654,0.000029482593,0.00025106993,0.000021163944,9.0251837e-7,0.000018122864,0.0002252219,0.00001132807,0.00045611264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99919516,0.00002079658,0.00027727583,0.0000052033415,6.9008547e-7,0.00001671221,0.00023180545,0.0000018266858,0.0002505272],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99971575,0.000060569928,0.000026547688,0.00004960641,0.00009487113,0.000052596566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996877,0.000039304246,0.00007226192,0.000029513134,0.000104747465,0.00006653451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043612253,0.00039817794,0.00029717744,0.0016516282,0.0007877542,0.00067547354,0.00029572894,0.00033652407,0.0006321694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037149043,0.00017504116,0.0005083147,0.0025463873,0.00047285014,0.00040643997,0.0007233374,0.00014430031,0.00006598188],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017947014,0.00014995493,0.9382939,0.00015490515,0.0002069003,0.00083661114,0.0015872146,0.00851634,0.014561357,0.00042222795,0.0006909477,0.034400184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075065645,0.00006466859,0.9918155,0.000004751143,0.000030437212,0.00006762728,0.0009773223,0.0049026688,0.0014685483,0.00008071841,0.0005658088,0.000014391705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.093365364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15979463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.093365364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015808925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016055561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18564385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135487849","doi":"10.2166/wrd.2021.087","title":"Improving the implementation of water and resource recovery in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination","topic":"Wastewater Treatment and Reuse","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Alberta Innovates","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Resource (disambiguation); Business; Government (linguistics); Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.0061170114870709455,"score_gpt":0.20292147541023622,"score_spread":0.19680446392316528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135487849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8316778,0.00340285,0.0059643616,0.05500599,0.00034089235,0.0019127418,0.0013221483,0.0006650011,0.09970837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97009134,0.0011587999,0.007086179,0.0036060312,0.000014045568,0.00023667928,0.00041870566,0.0000554583,0.017332736],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862234,0.0023576661,0.0003734098,0.00078357966,0.004548471,0.005713598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9760401,0.0018314761,0.00079454016,0.00050317775,0.014245423,0.0065852455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007826342,0.00038700894,0.00044458883,0.0014913086,0.012879961,0.0043136864,0.0035468217,0.001468654,0.0052071516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014632037,0.00041835735,0.00051374343,0.0025139076,0.0027870277,0.0014988682,0.0040339967,0.0021512655,0.00033751174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007714414,0.0019994082,0.14808808,0.002806195,0.00027923135,0.0032989418,0.08255897,0.014992203,0.01683948,0.053761587,0.095797025,0.5788074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017631591,0.0008781329,0.44415528,0.0011356745,0.00015564727,0.00019937553,0.1223091,0.0086395005,0.007556178,0.002695968,0.4117293,0.0003695151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9968437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21740927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21740927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5396597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90769434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}